Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
GRENADES
The lack of an effective hand grenade, coupled with their danger to the user and their lack of utility
meant that they were regarded as increasingly obsolete pieces of military equipment. In 1902, the
British War Office announced that hand grenades were obsolete and had no place in modern
warfare. Within two years, following the success of improvised grenades in the trench warfare
conditions of the Russo-Japanese War, and reports from General Sir Aylmer Haldane, a British
observer of the conflict, a reassessment was quickly made and the Board of Ordnance was
instructed to develop a practical hand grenade.[15] Various models using a percussion fuze were built,
but this type of fuze suffered from various practical problems, and they were not commissioned in
large numbers.[14]
Marten Hale, better known for patenting the Hales rifle grenade, developed a modern hand grenade
in 1906 but was unsuccessful in persuading the British Army to adopt the weapon until 1913. Hale's
chief competitor was Nils Waltersen Aasen, who invented his design in 1906 in Norway, receiving a
patent for it in England. Aasen began his experiments with developing a grenade while serving as a
sergeant in the Oscarsborg Fortress. Aasen formed the Aasenske Granatkompani in Denmark,
which before the First World War produced and exported hand grenades in large numbers across
Europe. He had success in marketing his weapon to the French and was appointed as a Knight of
the French Legion in 1916 for the invention.[14]
The Royal Laboratory developed the No. 1 grenade in 1908. It contained explosive material with an
iron fragmentation band, with an impact fuze, detonating when the top of the grenade hit the ground.
A long cane handle (approximately 16 inches or 40 cm) allowed the user to throw the grenade
farther than the blast of the explosion.[15]
Early in World War I, combatant nations only had small grenades, similar to Hales' and Aasen's
design. The Italian Besozzi grenade had a five-second fuze with a match-tip that was ignited by
striking on a ring on the soldier's hand.[16] As an interim measure, troops often improvised their own
grenades, such as the jam tin grenade.
ROMAN EMPIRE
PUGIO (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1t_X9TZlkQ) JR
A pugio was a dagger used by Roman soldiers, likely as a sidearm. Like other items of legionary
equipment, the dagger underwent some changes during the 1st century. Generally, it had a large,
leaf-shaped blade 18 to 28 cm long and 5 cm or more in width. A raised midrib ran the length of
each side, either simply standing out from the face or defined by grooves on either side. It was
changed by making the blade a little thinner, about 3 mm, and the handle was also made out of
metal. The tang was wide and flat initially, and the grip was riveted through it, as well as through the
shoulders of the blade.
Around 50 AD, a rod tang was introduced, and the hilt was no longer riveted through the shoulders
of the blade. This in itself caused no great change to the pugio's appearance, but some of these later
blades were narrower (under 3.5 cm wide), and/or had little or no waisting, and/or had reduced or
vestigial midribs.
Throughout the period, the outline of the hilt remained approximately the same. It was made with two
layers of horn, wood or bone sandwiching the tang, each overlaid with a thin metal plate. Often the
hilt was decorated with inlaid silver. The hilt was 10–12 cm long overall and the grip was quite
narrow; which produced a very secure grip. An expansion or lump in the middle of the handle made
the user's grip even more secure.
Gladius is the general Latin word for "sword". In the Roman Republic, the term gladius
Hispaniensis (Spanish sword) referred (and still refers) specifically to the short sword, 60 cm (24
inches) long, used by Roman legionaries from the 3rd century BC. Several different better-known
designs followed; among collectors and historical reenactors, the two primary kinds of swords are
known as the Mainz gladius, and the Pompeii gladius which follows the Mainz type, which had itself
followed the 'Hispaniensis' (these names refer to where or how the canonical example was found).
More recent archaeological finds have confirmed the appearance of the earlier version, the gladius
Hispaniensis. The legionaries wore their gladii on their right hips.
Viking
Two distinct classes of knives were in use by Vikings. The more common one was a rather plain,
single edge knife of normal construction, called a knifr. These are found in most graves, being
the only weapon allowed for all, even slaves. Smaller versions served as the everyday utility tool,
while longer versions were likely meant for hunting or combat or both. Weapon knives
sometimes had ornamental inlays on the blade.[8] The construction was similar to traditional
Scandinavian knives. The tang ran through a more or less cylindrical handle, the blade was
straight with the edge sweeping upward at the tip to meet the back of the blade in a
point.[8] The knife apparently played an important role for all Scandinavians. This is evidenced
by the large number of knives found in burial sites of not just the men, but the women and
children too.[9]
The other type was the seax. The type associated with Vikings is the so-called broken-
back style seax. It was usually a bit heavier than the regular knife and would serve as
a machete- or falchion-like arm. A wealthier man might own a larger seax, some being
effectively swords. With the single edge and heavy blade, this somewhat crude weapon
would be relatively simple to use and produce, compared to the regular sword. A rather
long tang is fitted to many examples, indicating they may have had a longer handle for
two-handed use. The smaller knife-like seaxes were likely within the fabrication ability of
a common blacksmith.
The Seax was in widespread use among the Migration period Germanic tribes, and is
even eponymous of the Saxons. It appears in Scandinavia from the 4th century, and
shows a pattern of distribution from the lower Elbe (the Irminones) to Anglo-Saxon
England. While its popularity on the continent declines with the end of the Migration
period, it remained in the British Isles where it was taken up by the Vikings. The large,
sword-like seaxes are primarily found in connection with Viking settlements in England
and Ireland, but do not appear very commonly in Scandinavia.[3]