Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

PROJECT : PAGE :

CLIENT : DESIGN BY :
JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY :
Wall Footing Design Based on ACI 318-99

INPUT DATA DESIGN SUMMARY


CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 4 ksi FOOTING WIDTH B = 3.00 ft
REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi FOOTING LENGTH L = 19.00 ft
AXIAL DEAD LOAD PDL = 15 k FOOTING THICKNESS T = 12.00 in
DEAD LOAD MOMENT MDL = 30 ft-k
AXIAL LIVE LOAD PLL = 10 k LONG. BARS AT ENDS (BOTTOM) 3 # 5 STRAIGHT
LIVE LOAD MOMENT MLL = 0 ft-k LONG. BARS AT WALL (BOTTOM) 3 # 5 CONT. BARS
LATERAL LOAD (0=WIND, 1=SEISMIC) 1 Seismic
SEISMIC AXIAL LOAD,IBC (16-28) PLAT = 0 k
SEISMIC MOMENT, IBC Eq(16-28) MLAT = 100 ft-k LONG. BARS AT ENDS (TOP) 2 # 5 STRAIGHT
WALL THICKNESS t = 6 in
WALL LENGTH Lw = 14 ft
WALL FOOTING EXTENSION Le = 2.5 ft
FOOTING WIDTH B = 3 ft
FOOTING THICKNESS T = 12 in
FOOTING EMBEDMENT DEPTH Df = 2 ft
SURCHARGE qs = 0 ksf
SOIL WEIGHT ws = 0.11 kcf
ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE Qa = 2 ksf
LONGITUDINAL REINF. BAR SIZE : # 5
TRANSVERSE REINF. BAR SIZE : # 4
THE FOOTING DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
DESIGN LOADS (IBC 2000 SEC.1605.3.2 & ACI 318-99 SEC.9.2.1)
CASE 1: DL + LL P = 28 k 1.4 DL + 1.7 LL Pu = 38 k
M = 30 ft-k Mu = 42 ft-k
e = 1.09 ft, < (L / 6) eu = 1.11 ft, < (L / 6)
CASE 2: DL + LL + E / 1.4 P = 28 k 1.2 DL + 1.0 LL + 1.0 E Pu = 28 k
M = 101 ft-k Mu = 136 ft-k
e = 3.68 ft, > (L / 6) eu = 4.86 ft, > (L / 6)
CASE 3: 0.9 DL + E / 1.4 P = 16 k 0.9 DL + 1.0 E Pu = 14 k
M = 98 ft-k Mu = 127 ft-k
e = 6.23 ft, > (L / 6) eu = 9.41 ft, > (L / 6)

e max < 0.5 L , [Satisfactory]


CHECK SOIL BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 318-99 SEC.15.2.2)

  6e 
 P 1  L 
    q  0.15  L
q MAX  s  w s  T , for e  CASE 1 CASE 2 CASE 3
BL 6 = 0.69 ksf, 1.09 ksf, 1.11 ksf
 2P L
  q s   0.15  w s  T , for e 
 3B(0.5L  e) 6 q MAX < kQa, [Satisfactory]
where k = 1 for gravity loads, 4/3 for lateral loads.
DESIGN FOR FLEXURE (ACI 318-99 SEC.15.4.2, 10.2, 10.5.3, 10.5.4, 7.12.2, 12.2, & 12.5)

 Mu   T
0.85 f 'c 1  1    0.0018 , for top  bottom
 0.383b d 2 f 'c  d
    MIN 
fy  MIN  4   , for top or bottom only

 3 
 0.85  1 f 'c 87  REINFORCING IN LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION
 MAX  0.75   2 2
 fy 87  f y AS, L, bott. = 0.78 in AS, L, top = 0.39 in
 
REINFORCING IN TRANSVERSE DIRECTION
2 2
AS, T, bott. = 0.00 in / ft AS, T, top = 0.00 in / ft
 
  0.075 d b f y 
LONGITUDINAL TRANSVERSE
L d  MAX  , 12 in 
requird

  provided '  K   = 11.90 in , 11.66 in


 f c  c  tr  
  d b  

  
requird 0.02c b  d b f
L dh  MAX  , 8d b , 6 in 
y LONGITUDINAL TRANSVERSE
  provided '
fc  = 6.94 in , 6.45 in
 

CHECK FLEXURE SHEAR (ACI 318-99 SEC.15.5.2, 11.1.3.1, & 11.3)

LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION

V u,L  MAX
 7.25 kips < 2 Bd fc
'
250.54 kips
[Satisfactory]

TRANSVERSE DIRECTION

V u,T  2 Ld fc
'
 0.65 kips / ft < 11.29 kips / ft
MAX
[Satisfactory]

where φ = 0.85 (ACI 318-99, Section 9.3.2.3 )

Вам также может понравиться