Clayton M. Christensen, Scott D. Anthony, Gerald Berstell, Denise Nitterhouse
The fallacy that most companies fall into is to aim for market segmentation through: o Characteristics of their product (affordability, features) o Demographics of the customers (age, gender, income) The issue is that these are static parameters and does not take into consideration neither the changing customer behaviours nor their changing requirements. Once the market is segmented based on product or customer characteristics, companies try to position themselves by identifying an unexplored area in a 2X2 matrix based on quality or uniqueness (spectrum of products). However, companies will not be able to maintain this kind of differentiation because competitors easily mimic the same products with additional features. Hence, the companies won’t be able to charge the premium they were initially charging and will be drawn to a price war or will require further investments in R&D for innovation. However, the latter will also get mimicked and the vicious cycle continues. To overcome this fallacy, differentiation should be along the lines which is not easy to mimic. For this, it is important to understand the job that the customer aims to fulfil by buying the product or service and then segment the market to fulfil such jobs. Once the company identifies the job customer wants to be fulfilled, the spectrum of competition widens since it is not just the direct competitor of the product that is out there to fulfil that requirement. Here, the company has shifted from a seller’s perspective (product features) to a customer’s perspective (why he uses the product, when he uses it, where he uses it and how he uses it). This will enable the company to enhance the key attributes of customer experience rather than forcing the customer to compromise with a product that the company just wants to sell. This helps the company compete against the real competition, which is much larger than a product category-defined market. To grow a company, first place to look for customers is in the current customer base of the company. It is followed by looking for customers who are buying the competing products instead and then finally by looking at non-consumers who are unable to find the right solutions for the job that they have. The latter will help in disruptive innovations for the company. If the job is known, interviews and surveys need to be done to understand the situation in which the customer buys rather than the characteristics of the costumer. This will enable the company to understand the functional and emotional dimensions in which a customer buys and hence is not restricted even if that customer’s need changes. If the job is vague and complete solution is not available, instead of qualitative methods, customer should be shadowed to understand what they really want. Sometime, empathic discovery needs to be done, where the company should “live with the problem” to understand the product that is needed to solve it. If it is a completely new application and customer is not sure of what they want, then company needs to make the product flexible, so that it can be fine-tuned multiple times through coevolution. The key aspect in innovation is to identify the “help wanted” signs from the consumers and solve it by consolidating similar requirements from multiple consumers. For every product that is developed, there must be a purpose it should solve (purpose brand). It will tell the customers which job is being addressed and it will tell the company what features are relevant to the job that need to be made. The most important learning is that every company should understand the mindset of the customer and devise solutions to enhance their experience, while developing products.