Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
This material was developed for students enrolled in MT2141 Principles and Strategies of Teaching in Health
Education. College of Medical Technology, New Era University. May 2017. Obtain permission prior to use.
Guillano C. Lacsamana, RMT. gclacsamana@up.edu.ph
Page 2 of 5
• Not suited for higher levels of thinking, if this is the only strategy used
• Not conducive for personalized instruction
• Encourages passive learners
• Provides little feedback for learners
• Students’ attention wavers 30 minutes or less
• Not appropriate for children below the 4th grade level
• Consistent use inhibits development of inductive reasoning
• Poorly delivered lectures lead to non-learning
• Students sometimes think that the lecturer presents all that they need to know
• Affective learning seldom occurs in a lecture-only format
Potential Problems
• Student boredom – due to the influence of technology, lectures might get boring
especially since the student has lots of access to information
• Institutional barriers – classes that are conducted too early or too late, bad faculty-to-
student ratio
• Negative press – negative comments from students about the lecturer may pre-empt their
attention and enthusiasm, especially if this is the only strategy used
• Knowledge retention – 80% of the lecture content is immediately forgotten the day after
it is conducted
This material was developed for students enrolled in MT2141 Principles and Strategies of Teaching in Health
Education. College of Medical Technology, New Era University. May 2017. Obtain permission prior to use.
Guillano C. Lacsamana, RMT. gclacsamana@up.edu.ph
Page 3 of 5
Potential Problems
• Cost issues – there is a great number of faculty required to achieve this strategy
(delivering education to small groups)
• Effectivity – lack of evidence bases on the implementation of this strategy may lead
faculty to not use this strategy at all
This material was developed for students enrolled in MT2141 Principles and Strategies of Teaching in Health
Education. College of Medical Technology, New Era University. May 2017. Obtain permission prior to use.
Guillano C. Lacsamana, RMT. gclacsamana@up.edu.ph
Page 4 of 5
Potential Problems
• Diverse methods of learning – not all types of students can benefit from these learning
schemes (such as graduate students, primarily those aged 40 and above)
• Academic misconduct – students may commit plagiarism when answering questions
online
• Faculty perceptions – older faculty may not readily appreciate this teaching strategy
This material was developed for students enrolled in MT2141 Principles and Strategies of Teaching in Health
Education. College of Medical Technology, New Era University. May 2017. Obtain permission prior to use.
Guillano C. Lacsamana, RMT. gclacsamana@up.edu.ph
Page 5 of 5
• Students must be assigned the following roles: two for the affirmative, two for the
negative, and one moderator
• Debate formats can be discussed by the faculty and students, but usually, the process has
the following steps:
o Affirmative and negative presentations
o Rebuttals
o Summary of points discussed
• Students may write a formal paper after the debate to reinforce learning
Potential Problems
• Lack of preparation may lead to lack of understanding of the topic
• Since many topics can have no definite conclusions or answers, debates may impose false
dualism on these topics
• Nervousness and fear of public speaking can be a concern
• The confrontational nature of a debate may bring about anxiety
REFERENCE:
Bradshaw, M., & Lowenstein, A. (2011). Innovative Teaching Strategies in Nursing and Related
Health Professions (5th ed.). Sudbury, Massachusetts, USA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
This material was developed for students enrolled in MT2141 Principles and Strategies of Teaching in Health
Education. College of Medical Technology, New Era University. May 2017. Obtain permission prior to use.
Guillano C. Lacsamana, RMT. gclacsamana@up.edu.ph