Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
R. L u o & B. E d l u n d
Division of Steel and Timber Structures, Chalmers University of Technology,
S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
(Received 27 May 1994; accepted 20 December 1994)
ABSTRACT
1 INTRODUCTION
135
136 R. Luo, B. Edlund
(large rotation/small strain) analysis. For plate girders with flat webs, such
comprehensive analyses have been carried out, see e.g. Crisfield, ~ Frieze
e t al. 2 and references therein. A rather common loading case on such
girders is a concentrated load applied perpendicularly to the upper flange
in the plane of the web. This loading case, usually called patch loading,
occurs for crane girders with a moving load or when girders are erected by
launching, etc.
In practice, plate girders with flat webs are often stiffened by welding
stiffeners to the webs. In many cases, however, flat webs are replaced with
corrugated webs of trapezoidal or other types, resulting in a kind of
distributed web stiffening. To carry a given load, a girder with corrugated
web thus in general needs less material and, therefore, provides a lighter
structure in comparison with a girder with web stiffeners. Besides the
convenience in the manufacture, this should be the most important reason
why the application of such girders should be widely increasing.
For girders with corrugated webs, however, few experiments and
numerical investigations have been made. Bergfelt e t al. 3 made some
experiments on such girders under shear loading and patch loading. Frey 4
and Gachon 5 tested shear buckling of girders with 'folded' web and with
smoothly undulating corrugations, respectively. Lindner 6 also conducted
similar experiments and, in addition, examined various interaction
formulae suggested by other researchers over the years. L u o 7 and Luo and
Edlund 8 applied a spline finite strip method to study the buckling
behaviour of steel panels with trapezoidally corrugated webs. This paper
can be considered as a continuation of the work reported in Refs 7 and 8.
In this paper, ultimate strength of steel girders with trapezoidally
corrugated webs under patch loading is studied using a non-linear finite
element method. Effect of large deflection is taken into account and a v o n
Mises material without strain hardening (elastic perfectly-plastic), and
with strain-hardening obeying Ramberg-Osgood's equation, 9 is assumed.
Various factors that influence the ultimate strength are investigated. Some
numerical results are compared with experiments that were conducted at
Chalmers University of Technology by Dahl6n and Krona. ~° Based upon
the results, an empirical formula for the prediction of the ultimate strength
is suggested.
2 N O N - L I N E A R FINITE E L E M E N T M O D E L A N D
C O N V E R G E N C Y STUDY
(1) Six meshes as shown in Fig. 2 and nine integration points through
tlae element thickness are used for the analysis. In Fig. 3, relations
between the load (P) and the vertical deflection (6) of the upper
flange at the loading point (cf. Fig. 1), are plotted for each of these
six meshes. The results clearly indicate that a convergent solution
has been obtained when the mesh given in Fig. 2(e) is used.
(2) The mesh given in Fig. 2(e) is used for the analysis, the number of
integration points through the element thickness is set to 3, 5 and 9.
In Fig. 4, P-6 curves obtained by the finite element analysis are
plotted. It can be seen that almost identical results can be obtained
when 5- or 9-point integrations are used, but that the ultimate
138 R. Luo, B. Edlund
Y P
(a)
x
IIIIIII
L
(b)
bLLdLLb
z
Fig. 1. A steel girder with trapezoidally corrugated webs under patch loading: (a) the
girder and the load; (b) the geometry of the web and the flange.
Among the many factors that may influence the ultimate load of the
girders under patch loading, it is believed that the following are the most
important:
(1) strain-hardening model;
(2) corner-effect;
(3) initial imperfections (local and global);
(4) loading position;
Ultimate strength of girders 139
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
L IIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIII
IIIllllll
HnHm|l
fififi!!! lilliillllllllllllllllUl
|1||1||1., IIIIIIIII I
IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII ;i i
IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII I i
IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII
illililll IIIIIIIII
ililinll IIIIIIIII i
.m.!! 111111111
IIIIIIIL, IIIIIIII!
liniiil IIIIIIIii
L~ IIIIIIII L 111111111
IIIIIIII IIIIIIIII i
I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l l l l l
IIIIllillllllllllllinl IIIIIIIIII II
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIll lii
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII II
IIIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiii IIIIIIIIII Hi
IIIIIIIIIII Illillllll II
Illililllli IIIIIIIlil II
Illiilllill i IIIIIIIIII II
II Illlll I IIIIIIIIII in
IIIIIII IIIIIIIIII Ri
fllllilllll I li IIIIIIIIII II
L._a lilllllllil i L IIIIIIIIII II
iilllllllll i IIIIIIIIII II
Fig. 2. Six meshes for convergence study (the convergence found with mesh 5).
140 R. Luo, B. Edlund
150,
mesh 1
........ mesh 2
100. mesh 3
.......... mesh 4
.......... mesh 5
mesh 6
50
0 . . . . Deflection (mm)
0 5 10 15 20
Load P (kN)
100'
8
5O
'/I ~ number of integration points - 3
/ I
0 ~ Deflection 6 (mm)
0 2 4 6 8 10
4 ULTIMATE STRENGTH
Sections 4.1-4.3 and 4.6. This means that the load is at the midpoint of the
'flat part' of the corrugation. In Section 4.4 two other load positions are
also investigated. In Section 4-5, such a knife-load is replaced with a
uniformly distributed load over an area of c x bf to study the effects of the
width of load distribution.
In Fig. 5, two different effective stress (tr) versus effective strain (e)
relationships, or simply two stress-strain curves are shown, namely for an
elastic-perfectly plastic material and for the elastic-plastic material with
strain-hardening obeying a R a m b e r g - O s g o o d equation. F o r the
R a m b e r g - O s g o o d model, we have:
o
(1)
1-66
where n is a factor to describe the sharpness of the knee of the stress-strain
curve, cf. Section 4.2, and tr r, is the stress at which the remaining plastic
strain is p % . For mild steel, p = 0.2 has been suggested, which will be used
in the investigation.
In the finite element analysis, the elastic-plastic models represented by
Fig. 5 are assumed for the webs and only the elastic-perfectly plastic
material model is assumed for the flanges. F o r some geometric
parameters the values of the test girders in Ref. 10 are chosen:
(a) (b)
ff
t O
Oy
/ /
v
0.2%
Fig. 5. Stress-strain relations used in the finite element analysis: (a) elastic-perfectly
plastic model; (b) Ramberg-Osgood's model.
Ultimate strength of girders 143
l o a d (kN) ~=m.s~
I ' 143"8
1111"
0 5 10 15
Deflection (ram)
TABLE 1
Ultimate Strength o f Steel Girders Using Different Strain-Hardening Models
4.2 Corner-effects
o: _ /~ (2)
ay (r/t) m
where,
fl = 3-69 t r u - 0.819 (au']2-1.79 (3)
try \ay/
and
°t
0.002 e
exponent n in the Ramberg-Osgood equation is set to 10-8 for the flat part
of the web and 12-9 for the corner part. Other parameters are the same as
those used in the previous section.
Relations between the load and the deflection of the upper flange at the
loading point obtained in the finite element analysis of this case are also
plotted in Fig. 6. It may be noticed that for this example the corner effect
is not significant although a slightly higher load-carrying capacity than
that obtained without considering the corner effect can be observed.
The deformations of the girder observed during the loading process are
developed in such a manner, that a bubble formed due to large deforma-
tions is seen first within the flat part of the web directly under the load,
(a) (b)
Height (m)
1,000'
0,800.
Pmax=151kN
0,600'
P=133kN
0,400'
0200'
0 ~46
t ~ R ~ ¸ 24
0,000 i |
-10 10 20
Olllpktcente~ (mm)
(c) (d)
0¸246
Fig. 8. Out-of-plane deformation and plastic zones (comer effects included, P = 143.8 kN,
cf. Fig. 6): (a) deformation contour; (b) web displacement along the vertical line through
the loading point; (c) plastic zone in the web, and (d) plastic zone in the upper flange.
146 R. Luo, B. Edlund
and then two such bubbles appear in the oblique parts adjacent to the first
bubble (one bubble .in each oblique part) when increasing the load.
Moreover, almost at the same time as these bubbles appear, plastic
deformations occur in the regions where the bubbles form. Such web
behaviour is found to be about the same for the two analyses with and
without consideration of the corner-effects respectively. Figure 8
illustrates the out-of-plane deformations and plastic zones obtained in the
finite element analysis where the corner-effects are included, for a load
level which is beyond the m a x i m u m load, namely P = 143.8 kN, cf. Fig. 6.
It is clearly shown in Fig. 8 that a so-called three-hinge-flange mechanism
has been developed as has frequently been observed in experiments. F r o m
these observations, it should be easier to understand why the load-
carrying capacity cannot be increased greatly even if such corner-effects
are included.
Load(kN)
•150100 ~ m p e d e c t i o n
r[ -- within'~ialglobalimpeaection
t -" withoutimperfection
• experiment by Dahl6n& Krona[10]
50 ,,,.o~o~~_
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Deflection(mm)
Fit;. 9. Load~leflection relations obtained with various initial imperfections.
can be observed that the small global initial imperfection does not have
much effect on the behaviour and load-carrying capacity of the girder. On
the other hand, the local initial imperfection results in a notable effect (a
reduction of nearly 7% in the ultimate load). In addition, the load-
displacement curve obtained for the girder with a local imperfection is
somewhat closer to that from the experiments, than the other two
computed curves of Fig. 9. Indeed, the first of the two latter curves almost
coincides with the second one in the declining part.
(a) C
(b) (c)
; *-~ I I ; ' '
'
,
| I I
,
I
~] ', : : :
I I | I '1 I
I i " I I
Fig. 1O. Three loading positions: (a) loaded at the centre of the flat part; (b) loaded at the
corner part; (c) loaded at the oblique part.
Load (kN)
o~ r t )
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Deflection (mm)
Fig. 11. Load-deflection relations obtained with different loading positions.
applied to the centre of the oblique part, the girder has the highest
ultimate load, whereas the girder has the lowest ultimate load when it is
applied to the centre of the flat part. Also, when the load is applied to
the centre of the oblique part and to the corner, the load carrying
capacity drops rapidly after the ultimate load is reached, but when the
load is applied to the centre of the flat part, it reduces smoothly. The
experimental results, Figs 9 and 11, show a similar trend as the
numerical results.
Dahl6n and Krona ~° observed in their experiments that the webs are
Ultimate strength of girders 149
.p
(a) t
(b)
.,.,=Z,,.,,m~m~
"I ...... 1 1. %
. ... ~ =, ~ - °l'mml;-
. ,~=,= -
IIIIIiillllnllUllllltlllll
IllllllllllUllllllllmlllll
iiiiimlllllllllllllrmmllll
IIIliilllllMIIIIIB|llll
IIIIEIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIlUlIIIIIIlUlIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIII1111111111111111111111
l "= ~.JILIJLJJILULLLLIII III, 1o III III
IIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIII !1111
(c)
Fig. 12. Out-of-plane deformation and plastic zones (a knife load applied to the oblique
part, c o m e r effect included, P = 140.3 kN, cf. Fig. I 1): (a) deformation contour; (b) plastic
zone in the web, and (c) plastic zone in the upper flange.
150 R. Luo, B. Edlund
Load (kN)
=t / .... ---.
11 /
V - experiment
(Dahldn& Krona[101,c-50mm)
0 ~ I)eflecUon(ram)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Fig. 13. Load~zleflectionrelations obtained with different distribution of a load applied at
the flat part.
Ultimate strength of girders 151
Load(kN)
150- ~ 3 0 o
11111'
50'
0 . . . . DeflectionImm)
0 5 10 15 20
Fig. 14. Load-deflection relations obtained with various corrugation angles ~t.
152 R. Luo, B. Edlund
Load (kN)
0 5 10 15
Deflection (mm)
L o a d (kN) if = 14 mm
200
t ~
--
If 12mm
.1 ..................................... ........
| l i ~ -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ',_:~_".__
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Deflection (ram)
Fig. 16. Load~leflection relations obtained with different flange's thickness.
Ultimate strength of girders 153
TABLE 2
Ultimate Strength of Steel Girder Under Knife Loading with
Various H and L
analysi,~ are plotted for tw = 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, 2.62 mm and
4.0 mm. The results shown in the figure indicate that the ultimate load
increases almost proportionally to the web thickness.
In Fig. 16, load-xleflection curves obtained by the finite element analysis
are plotted for tf = 6.0 mm, 8.0 mm, 10.0 mm, 12-0 mm and 14.0 mm. It is
observe,d that when the thickness of the flange is increased from 6-0 mm to
14.0 m m the ultimate load increases, again, nearly proportionally to the
flange thickness.
In Table 2, the ultimate strength obtained by the finite element analysis
is given for girders under knife-edge load and with various H and L. The
results show that as the flanges are rather strong (tf = 10 mm), H and L
do not have much effect on the ultimate strength except when H is smaller
than about 200 mm.
For plate girders with flat webs under patch loading, several empirical
formulae have been suggested for the prediction of the ultimate strength,
see e.g. Bergfelt and Lindgren. 2° Bergfelt and Lindgren's formula is the
simplest one which is written as
Pu =: 13"Optftwtry
w
(8)
where p is a positive parameter which depends on the ratio tf/tw.
Doubtless, if eqn (8) is directly applied to girders with corrugated webs the
ultimate strength is underestimated. For girders with corrugated webs, it is
believed that the ultimate strength can still be estimated with an equation
similar to eqn (8). Hence, based upon the numerical results obtained in
154 R. Luo, B. Edlund
6 CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES