Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2
Department of Sustainable Technologies, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences,
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Abstract
Kabutey A., Herák D., Dajbych O., Divišová M., Boatri W.E., Sigalingging R., 2014. Deformation energy of
Jatropha curcas L. seeds under compression loading. Res. Agr. Eng., 60: 68–74.
The present research is a follow-up of the previous studies on mechanical behaviour of Jatropha curcas L. seeds under
compression loading. The research describes in detail the deformation energy which was determined from the area
under the force-deformation curve. The compression device ZDM 50-2313/56/18 with a chart recorder and pressing
vessel of diameter 76 mm were used to record the force-deformation functions of varying moisture content between
8.46% and 36.50% w.b. of Jatropha curcas L. seeds. Under the force-deformation curve, three main descriptions namely
the increasing function (smooth curve), wave-effect characteristics (serration effect) and whole area under the force-
deformation curve were analysed. For each of the force-deformation curve descriptions, it was found that moisture
content influenced the values of compressive force, deformation, deformation energy and seed hardness. Interestingly,
the research findings conclude that moisture content is a primary factor contributing to the wave-effect characteristics
on the force-deformation curve.
Keywords: seed moisture content; compressive force; deformation curve; smooth curve; serration effect
Jatropha curcas L. is an energy crop which is the crop has become very important especially for
used as a feedstock for biodiesel production (Hel- optimization of mechanical oil extraction method
ler 1996). The crop can be grown on degraded and involving screw presses or extruders. However, liter-
marginal lands and under drought conditions (Brit- ature information on the physical properties and no-
taine, Lutaladio 2010). The plant and seeds are tably mechanical behaviour of jatropha crop are lim-
non-edible to both humans and animals due to the ited (Sirisomboon, Kitchaiya 2009) compared to
presence of toxic substances such as curcine and de- other oil-bearing crops such as sunflower, rape, flax,
terpine (Heller 1996; Martinez et al. 2006). Since peas and others (Gupta, Das 2000; Lysiak 2007).
jatropha oil is a potential biodiesel feedstock, the In the present research the mechanical proper-
study of the physical and mechanical properties of ties of jatropha crop with respect to the exact value
Supported by the Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague – IGA, Grant
No. 31130/1312/3102.
68
Res. Agr. Eng. Vol. 60, 2014, No. 2: 68–74
69
Vol. 60, 2014, No. 2: 68–74 Res. Agr. Eng.
curve (Lysiak 2007) was calculated using Eq. (2) Energy per unit volume. The volume energy,
(Herak et al. 2010). also known as the toughness, is the ratio of the de-
formation energy and pressing seed volume Eq. (4),
n=i−1
⎡ Fn+1 + Fn ⎞ ⎤
E= ∑ ⎢⎣⎛⎜⎝ 2 ⎠
⎟ × ( xn+1 − xn ) ⎥
⎦
(2) (Gupta, Das 2000):
n=0
where: E (4)
e=
E – deformation energy (J) V
Fn, Fn+1 – values of compressive force (N) where:
Xn, Xn+1 – values of seed deformation (m) e – volume energy (J/m3)
E – deformation energy (J)
Pressing seed volume. Seed volume was deter- V – pressing seed volume (m3)
mined using Eq. (3):
Seed hardness. The hardness (SH; N/mm) calcu-
π × D2
V= ×H (3) lation was determined using Eq. (5) which is de-
4 fined as the ratio of pressing force (PF; N) to that of
where: the seed max. deformation (D; mm):
V – pressing seed volume (m3)
PF
D – diameter of pressing vessel, 76 mm SH = (5)
D
H – height of seeds in the pressing vessel which was
measured at the height of H = 50 mm for all respec-
tive seed moisture content RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The pressing seed volume using Eq. (3) was found The results of the study are given in Tables 1
to be 2.26 × 10–4m3 which was constant for all and 2 and Figs 1–4. The study considered the de-
moisture content of the Jatropha curcas L. seeds. formation energy of Jatropha curcas L. seeds of
Table 1. Average values (± standard deviation) of measured parameters under the pressing area in relation to moisture
content
70
Res. Agr. Eng. Vol. 60, 2014, No. 2: 68–74
Table 2. Statistical analysis of determined parameters of Jatropha curcas L. seeds force deformation curve descrip-
tions, while Fcritical = 5.31
Force deformation
Determined parameters Equation R2 F P<
curve description
compressive force (N) –2,049MC + 116,984 0.95 62.19 0.05
Increasing function seed deformation (mm) –0.27MC + 36.69 0.95 59.19 0.05
(Smooth curve) deformation energy (J) –10.04MC + 524.79 0.97 119.27 0.05
2
hardness (N/mm) –2.83MC + 74.64MC + 2,407.64 0.96 27.75 0.05
2
compressive force (N) 55.88MC –368.93MC – 895.52 0.97 46.98 0.05
Wave-effect deed deformation (mm) 0.18MC – 1.77 0.91 30.81 0.05
characteristics
(Serration effect) deformation energy (J) 13.32MC – 120.24 0.97 108.66 0.05
hardness (N/mm) –26.8MC – 1,585MC + 11,438 0.95 21.96 0.05
compressive force (N) –9.41MC + 98,010 0.92 39.37 0.05
Whole area under seed deformation (mm) 2
0.02MC – 0.74MC + 39.73 0.83 5.21 > 0.05
the force-deformation
curve deformation energy (J) 0.31MC2 – 9.58MC + 497.36 0.97 40.13 0.05
2
hardness (N/mm) –1.06MC + 52.85MC – 2,467.72 0.65 1.92 > 0.05
MC – moisture content (% w.b.) of Jatropha curcas L. seeds; R2 – coefficient of determination (–); F – value of F test that
compares a pair of models (–); P – hypothesis value of the study outcomes significant level (–); Fcritical – critical value
that compares a pair of models (–)
varying moisture content between 8.46 and 36.50% tion energy (J), seed hardness (N/mm) and energy
w.b. The deformation energy is the energy which is per unit volume (J/m3) of Jatropha curcas L. seeds.
characterized by the area under the force-deforma- Statistical analysis of determined parameters un-
tion curve (Lysiak 2007). Three different pressing der the increasing function area without serration
areas were described under the force-deformation or wave-effect characteristics were significant at 5%
curve by examining the effect of moisture content probability level which indicates that an increase in
on pressing force (N), deformation (mm), deforma- moisture content linearly decreased the pressing
force, deformation, deformation energy and seed
hardness as shown in Fig. 2. It was observed during
100,000 the compression test that at high moisture content
MC (8.46% w.b.) the crude jatropha oil contained in the seed can
90,000 MC (28.57% w.b.)
only be obtained within this pressing region. This
80,000 MC (32.02% w.b.)
limit area confirms the statement that if the actual
Compressive force (N)
71
Vol. 60, 2014, No. 2: 68–74 Res. Agr. Eng.
(mm) (mm)
80,000
30 force (N) and deformation
100,000 y = –2,049MC + 116,984 force deformation 40
60,000 (mm) and (b) deformation en-
Deformation
R² = 0.954
Compressive
Deformation
R² = 0.954
Compressive
R² = 0.9518 10
20,000 20 (smooth curve)
40,000
0 y = –0.2715MC + 36.692 0
20,000 0 10 20R² = 0.9518 30 40 10
(b)
5000 04,000
energy (J)
(N/mm) (N/mm)
400 R² = 0.9652
3,000
500 4,000
energy (J)
HardnessHardness
400 R² = 0.9652 2,000
200 3,000
y = –10.045MC + 524.79
300
Deformation
R² = 0.9755 1,000
100 2,000
200 energy hardness
0 y = –10.045MC + 524.79 0
R²
20= 0.9755 40 1,000
100 0 10 30
energy hardness
0 Moisture content (% w.b.) 0
0 10 20 30 40
(mm) (mm)
60,000 5
(a)
70,000
50,000 force deformation 6
Deformation
60,000
40,000 R² = 0.9792 5
3
50,000
30,000
Deformation
40,000
20,000 R² = 0.9792
y = 0.1848MC – 1.7711 3
30,000
10,000 1
R² = 0.9113 2
20,000
0 0
0 10 20 y = 0.1848MC30 – 1.7711 40 1
10,000
R² = 0.9113
4000 energy hardness
014,000
0 10 20 30 40
energy (J)
12,000
(b)
300
(N/mm)(N/mm)
400 y =energy
13.318MC –hardness
120.23 14,000
10,000
R² = 0.9731
energy (J)
12,000
8,000
Deformation
200
300 y = 13.318MC – 120.23 10,000
6,000
Hardness
72
Res. Agr. Eng. Vol. 60, 2014, No. 2: 68–74
Deformation (mm)
Compressive force (N)
Hardness (N/mm)
400 3,100
3,050
300
3,000
200 2,950
2,900
100 y = –1.0553MC2 + 52.846MC + 2467.7
R² = 0.6585 2,850
0 2,800
0 10 20 30 40
Moisture content (% w.b.)
Moisture content (% w.b.)
the display of the wave-effect behaviour on the nutmeg respectively. The deformation energy and
force-deformation curve was followed by the ejec- seed hardness were not statistically significant in
tion of the kernel cake through the holes of the press- relation to the effect of moisture content as indi-
ing vessel. Additionally, it was observed that at low cated (Table 1). However, the increase in seed de-
seed moisture content the force-deformation curve formation was as a result of the plasticizing effect
showed smooth characteristics without wave-effect of the seeds moisture content as explained by (Ly-
behaviour which agrees with the previous results siak 2007) while the increase in deformation ener-
published by the authors (Kabutey et al. 2011). All gy was attributed to the whole pressing area under
measured parameters were statistically significant the curve with or without wave-effect behaviour,
(P < 0.05) whereby linear function best fitted the meaning that the bigger the pressing area under
compressive force and deformation energy in rela- the force-deformation curve the greater the defor-
tion to moisture content while polynomial function mation energy and vice versa. Furthermore, when
best suited the relationship between seed deforma- there is wave-effect behaviour as a result of mois-
tion and moisture content as well as seed hardness ture content, the seed deformation as well as the de-
and moisture content (Fig. 3). formation energy directly increases as reported in
For the whole pressing area under the force-de- the previous study (Kabutey et al. 2011).
formation curve (Fig. 4) which is a combination Finally, the present study results showed that
of both the increasing function area and the area mechanical properties and behaviour of the force-
with wave-effect, statistical analysis of determined deformation characteristic curve of Jatropha cur-
parameters showed both significant (P < 0.05) and cas L. seeds were greatly influenced by moisture
non-significant (P > 0.05) results. Increase in mois- content. Similarly, as reported by (Singh et al.
ture content influenced the compressive force and 2002) the seed moisture content affects residual oil
seed deformation. Similar results were obtained content and oil recovery efficiency in case of screw
from studies conducted by Gupta and Das (2000) presses; that is, higher moisture content increases
and Burubai et al. (2007) on sunflower seeds and plasticity and thereby reduces the level of compres-
73
Vol. 60, 2014, No. 2: 68–74 Res. Agr. Eng.
sion and contributes to low oil recovery. Also high- Heller J., 2006. Promoting the Conservation And Use
er moisture content acts as a lubricant resulting in Of Underutilized And Neglected Crops. 1. Physic Nut.
insufficient friction during pressing. Jatropha curcas L. Rome, International Plant Genetic
Resources Institute.
Herak D., Gurdil G., Sedlacek A., Dajbych O., Siman-
CONCLUSION juntak S., 2010. Energy demands for pressing Jatropha
curcas L. seeds. Biosystems Engineering, 106: 527–534.
The study results showed that two main pressing Herák D., Kabutey A., Sedláček A., Gűrdil G., 2012.
areas can be described under the force-deforma- Mechanical behaviour of several layers of selected plant
tion curve in relation to moisture content. These seeds under compression loading. Research in Agricultural
are the increasing function area and the area with Engineering, 58: 24–29.
serration effect. The increase in moisture content of ISI 1966. Indian standard methods for analysis of oilseeds,
Jatropha curcas L seeds was found to be the cause IS: 3579. New Delhi, Indian Standard Institute.
of serration effect on the force-deformation curve. Kabutey A., Herák D., Sedláček A., 2011. Behaviour of
However, other pressing factors such as compres- different moisture content of Jatroph curcas seeds under
sive force and friction are likely to contribute to compression loading. Research and Agricultural Engineer-
similar behaviour and this investigation would be ing, 2: 72–77.
considered in future research. Compressive force, Lysiak G., 2007. Fracture toughness of pea: Weibull Analysis.
deformation, deformation energy and seed hard- Journal of Food Engineering, 83: 436–443.
ness were influenced by the increase in moisture Martínez-Herrera J., Siddhuraju P., Francis G., Dávi-
content. The results obtained herein would be use- la-Ortíz G., Becker K., 2006. Chemical composition,
ful for designing suitable equipment for processing toxic/antimetabolic constituents, and effects of different
of oil from oil bearing crops. treatments on their levels, in four provenances of Jatropha
curcas L. from Mexico. Food Chemistry, 1: 80–89.
References Mitchell M., 2002. Enguage digitizer, version 4.1. Available
at http://www.sourceforge.net
Abbas G.C., Ali N., Hossein M., 2010. Strength behaviour Singh K.K., Wiesenborn D.P., Tostenson K., Kangas
study of apples under compression loading. Modern Ap- N., 2002. Influence of moisture content and cooking on
plied Sciences, 4: 173–182. screw pressing of Crambe seed. Journal of the American
Blahovec J., 2008. Agromatereials Study Guide. Prague, Oil Chemists’ Society, 79: 1–6.
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague: 7–8. Sirisomboon P., Kitchaiya P., 2009. Physical properties of
Brittaine R., Lutaladio N., 2010. Jatropha: A smallholder Jatropha curcas L. kernels after heat treatments. Biosys-
bioenergy crop. Integrated Crop Management, 8: 1–148. tems Engineering, 102: 244–250.
Burubai W., Akor A.J., Igoni A.H., Puyate Y.T., 2007. Ef- Zareiforoush H., Komarizadeh M.H., Alizadeh M.R.,
fects of temperature and moisture content on the strength 2010. Mechanical properties of paddy grains under quasi-
properties of African nutmeg (Monodora myristica). Inter- -staticcompressive loading. New York Science Journal, 3:
national Agrophysics, 21: 217–223. 40–46.
Gupta R.K., Das S.K., 2000. Fracture resistance of sunflower
seed and kernel to compressive loading. Journal of Food Received for publication March 3, 2012
Engineering, 46: 1–8. Accepted after correction October 2, 2012
Corresponding author:
Ing. Abraham Kabutey, Ph.D., Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Engineering,
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic
phone: + 420 775 661 481, fax: + 420 234 381 815, e-mail: kabutey@tf.czu.cz
74