CORELATION ANALYSIS

YEAR SALES CONSUMPTIO PURCHAS EMPLOYE ADMI

N E E COST N
COST
2018.0 2455.2 544.83 342.22 115.23 260.52
0 9
2017.0 2320.4 612.52 353.56 114.10 203.72
0 0
2016.0 2481.6 591.63 353.56 118.56 325.42
0 8
2015.0 2332.2 576.86 343.30 113.29 334.73
0 7
2014.0 2047.2 524.50 283.41 94.96 294.49
0 0
2013.0 1684.8 494.10 243.79 99.65 285.27
0 6
2012.0 1294.7 395.89 145.06 64.66 233.44
0 0
2011.0 1000.2 299.70 90.53 50.57 184.78
0 5
2010.0 904.46 238.27 40.85 43.46 161.47
0
2009.0 772.81 235.89 - 34.64 89.56
0

Correlations
porchaseofgoo adminexpense
year sales consumption d employeecost s
year Pearson Correlation 1 .962** .926** .937** .943** .670*
 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .034
N 10 10 10 9 10 10
sales Pearson Correlation .962** 1 .971** .990** .982** .793**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .006
N 10 10 10 9 10 10
consumption Pearson Correlation .926** .971** 1 .988** .984** .809**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .005
N 10 10 10 9 10 10
porchaseofgood Pearson Correlation .937** .990** .988** 1 .990** .728*
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .026
N 9 9 9 9 9 9
employeecost Pearson Correlation .943** .982** .984** .990** 1 .825**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .003
N 10 10 10 9 10 10
adminexpenses Pearson Correlation .670* .793** .809** .728* .825** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .034 .006 .005 .026 .003
N 10 10 10 9 10 10
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Variables Entered/Removeda
Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method
1 Employee cost, . Enter
admin
expenses,
consumption,
purchase of
goodb
a. Dependent Variable: sales

Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
1 .996a .992 .984 80.04616
a. Predictors: (Constant), employee cost, admin expenses,
consumption, purchase of good
 ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 3182418.826 4 795604.707 124.170 .000b
Residual 25629.549 4 6407.387
Total 3208048.375 8
a. Dependent Variable: sales
b. Predictors: (Constant), employee cost, admin expenses, consumption, purchase of good

Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized 95.0% Confidence Interval
Coefficients Coefficients for B
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 (Constant) 1402.721 372.893 3.762 .020 367.403 2438.039
consumption -3.385 1.403 -.716 -2.413 .073 -7.279 .510
Admin .222 .693 .022 .321 .764 -1.702 2.146
expenses
Purchase of 9.761 2.268 1.885 4.303 .013 3.463 16.059
good
Employee cost -4.382 7.007 -.205 -.625 .566 -23.835 15.072
a. Dependent Variable: sales

From the data we have taken above we kept net sales as dependent variable and admin cost,
employee cost , purchase and consumption of goods as independent variable. We wanted to
see the changes happening to sales by various expenses occurring in the organization as the p
value is less than .05 it can be concluded it is significant and shows that sales value changes
with the expenses made.