BELGICA VS. HONORABLE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY PAQUINTO N.
UDK-14951 – A Petition filed seeking that the PDAF be declared
OCHOA JR, ET AL unconstitutional, and a cease and desist order be issued restraining President Benigno Simeon S. Aquino III (President Aquino) and Topic: Self-Executing and Non- self -executing Provisions A self-executing Secretary Abad from releasing such funds to Members of Congress provision One of the petitioners submits that the Pork Barrel System enables GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA vs. HONORABLE EXECUTIVE politicians who are members of political dynasties to accumulate funds SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA JR, et al. to perpetuate themselves in power, in contravention of Section 26, Article II of the 1987 Constitution which states that: FACTS: Sec. 26. The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for The NBI Investigation was spawned by sworn affidavits of six (6) public service, and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by whistle-blowers who declared that JLN Corporation (Janet Lim law. (Emphasis and underscoring supplied) Napoles) had swindled billions of pesos from the public coffers for "ghost projects" using dummy NGOs. Thus, Criminal complaints were ISSUE: filed before the Office of the Ombudsman, charging five (5) lawmakers for Plunder, and three (3) other lawmakers for Malversation, Direct Whether or not Section 26, Article II of the 1987 Constitution is a self- Bribery, and Violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. Also executing law? recommended to be charged in the complaints are some of the lawmakers’ chiefs -of-staff or representatives, the heads and other officials of three (3) implementing agencies, and the several HELD: presidents of the NGOs set up by Napoles. NO, Section 26, Article II of the 1987 Constitution is not a self- Whistle-blowers alleged that" at least P900 Million from royalties in the executing law. operation of the Malampaya gas project off Palawan province intended for agrarian reform beneficiaries has gone into a dummy NGO. At the outset, suffice it to state that the foregoing provision is considered Several petitions were lodged before the Court similarly seeking that as not self-executing due to the qualifying phrase "as may be defined by the "Pork Barrel System" be declared unconstitutional law." In this respect, said provision does not, by and of itself, provide a judicially enforceable constitutional right but merely specifies guideline for Belgica, et al filed an Urgent Petition For Certiorari and Prohibition legislative or executive action. Therefore, since there appears to be no With Prayer For The Immediate Issuance of Temporary Restraining standing law which crystallizes the policy on political dynasties for Order and/or Writ of Preliminary Injunction seeking that the annual "Pork Barrel System," presently embodied in the provisions of the GAA enforcement, the Court must defer from ruling on this issue. of 2013 which provided for the 2013 PDAF, and the Executive‘s lump- sum, discretionary funds, such as the Malampaya Funds and the In any event, the Court finds the above-stated argument on this score to be Presidential Social Fund, be declared unconstitutional and null and largely speculative since it has not been properly demonstrated how the void for being acts constituting grave abuse of discretion. Also, they Pork Barrel System would be able to propagate political dynasties. pray that the Court issue a TRO against respondents.