INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

MARK ROBLES BUBUNGAN

Name of Employee: Name of Rater: FEBELYN M. ERAMIS
Position: Position:
Division: GENERAL SANTOS CITY Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATI
Performance Indicators
Time Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
line QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Quality Showed knowledge Showed Showed Showed No 5 4
Education Knowledge knowledge of content and its knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of acceptable
Services and of content integration within content and its content and its content and its evidence
Pedagogy within and and across subject integration within integration within integration within was shown
across areas as shown in and across subject and across subject and across
curriculum MOV 1 with a areas as shown in areas as shown in subject areas as
teaching rating of 7 MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1
areas. rating of 6 rating of 5 with a rating of 4

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
4 lessons using lessons using MOVlessons using MOVof the given MOV acceptable
MOV 1 and 1 and supported by1 and supported by evidence
supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other was shown
of the other given given MOV given MOV
MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Time Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
line QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 2. Used a Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No 5 4
Education range of different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching acceptable
Services teaching strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence was
strategies that promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading shown
enhance writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
learner numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
achievement in shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
literacy and a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
numeracy
skills 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner- Submitted 2 learner- Submitted 1 learner-No
learner-centered centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lessons as acceptable
lessons as evidently evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidence was
shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supportedMOV 1 and supportedany of the other shown
supported by any 1 of by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other given MOV
the other MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No 5 4
Education Knowledge and range of teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies acceptable
Services Pedagogy teaching that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical evidence was
strategies to and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative shown
develop critical skills and/or other skills and/or other skills and/or other thinking skills and/
and creative HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in or other HOTS as
thinking, as MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1
well as other of 7 of 6 of 5 with a rating of 4
higher order 7.5%
thinking skills.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No
lessons as evidenced as evidenced by MOV as evidenced by MOV as evidenced by any acceptable
by MOV 1 and 1 and supported by 1 and supported by of the other given evidence was
supported by any 1 of any 1 of the other any 1 of the other MOV shown
the other given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Time Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
line QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No 5 5
Education Environment classroom management management management management acceptable
Services and Diversity of structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence was
Learners engage engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in shown
learners, activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
individually or shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
in groups, in a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
meanigful
exploration, 7.5%
discovery and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No
hands-on lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of acceptable
activities MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the otherand any 1 of the otherthe acceptable MOVevidence was
within a range the other acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown
of physical MOV
learning
environments.
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No 5 4
Education learner management management management management acceptable
Services behavior strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner evidence was
constructively behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that shown
by applying promote positive and promote positive and promote positive and promote positive
positive and non-violent discipline non-violent discipline non-violent discipline and non-violent
non-violent as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV discipline as shown
discipline to submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a in MOV submitted
ensure rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 with a rating of 4
learning-
7.5%
focused
environment
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No
of the given strategiesof the given of the given the given strategies acceptable
as observed in at leaststrategies as strategies as as observed in only evidence was
4 lessons observed in 3 lessons observed in 2 lessons 1 lesson shown

Timeliness
 Time Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
line QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied No 5 4
Education Environment differentiated, teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to differentiated acceptable
Services and Diversity of developmental address learner address learner address learner teaching strategies evidence was
Learners ly appropriate diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in to address learner shown
learning MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating diversity as shown
experiences to of 7 of 6 of 5 in MOV 1 with a
address rating of 4
learners’
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
gender, needs,
7.5% differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated acceptable
strengths,
teaching strategies in teaching strategies in teaching strategies in teaching strategy in evidence was
interests and
at least 2 lessons as at least 2 lessons as 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as shown
experiences.
evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 evidently shown in
and supported by any and supported by any and supported by any any 1 of the
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No 5 5
Education and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented acceptable
Services implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
developmen- sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown
and learning
tally and learning process and learning process and learning process process as shown
sequenced as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 with a
teaching and with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 rating of 4
learning
processes to
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
meet 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally acceptable
curriculum
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching evidence was
requirements
and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning shown
and varied
as evidently shown in as evidently shown in as evidently shown in process as evidently
teaching
MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supportedMOV 1 and supportedshown in any 1 of
contexts.
by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other the given MOV
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Time Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
line QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 3. Curriculum 8. Participated Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No 3 3
Education and Planning in collegial participated in LACs/ participated in LACs/ participated in LACs/ in LAC/FGD/ acceptable
Services discussions FGDs/meetings to FGDs/meetings to FGDs/ meetings to meeting to discuss evidence was
that use discuss teacher/ discuss teacher/ discuss teacher/ teacher/learner shown
teacher and learner feedback to learner feedback to learner feedback to feedback to enrich
learner enrich instruction as enrich instruction as enrich instruction as instruction as
feedback to shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
enrich submitted submitted submitted submitted
teaching 7.5%
practice.
Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No
least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/meetingsLACs/FGDs/meetingsLAC/FGD/meeting acceptable
meetings as evidently as evidently shown in as evidently shown in as evidently shown evidence was
shown in any 1 of the any 1 of the given any 1 of the given in any 1 of the given shown
given MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No 5 4
Education developed, varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and acceptable
Services organized and learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, evidence was
used including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to shown
address learning
appropriate address learning address learning address learning goals as shown in
teaching and goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating
learning MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of 4
resources, of 7 of 6 of 5
including ICT,
to address
learning goals. 7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No
varied teaching & teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and acceptable
learning resour -ces, resources, including resources, including learning resource, evidence was
including ICT, as ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently including ICT, as shown
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and evidently shown in
MOV 1 and sup - supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of any of the
ported by any 1 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Time Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
line QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No 5 4
Education and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used acceptable
Services organized and diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, evidence was
used and summative and summative and summative formative and shown
summative
diagnostic, assessment assessment assessment assessment
formative and strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies
summative with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum consistent with
assessment requirements as requirements as requirements as curriculum
strategies shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with requirements as
consistent a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 4
with
curriculum
requirements.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No
varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as acceptable
tools as evidently evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidence was
shown in any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored Quality Consistently Frequently monitored Occasionally Rarely monitored No 3 3 3
Education and evaluated monitored and and evaluated learner monitored and and evaluated acceptable
Services learner evaluated learner progress and evaluated learner learner progress evidence was
progress and progress and achievement using progress and and achievement shown
achievement using learner attainment achievement using using learner
achievement learner attainment data as shown in the learner attainment attainment data as
using learner data as shown in the MOV submitted data as shown in the shown in the MOV
attainment MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted
data.
7.5% Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV acceptable
least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV No
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 was completed in acceptable
quarters quarters quarters only 1 quarter evidence was
shown
 Performance Indicators
Time Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
line QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. Assessment 12. Quality Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed No 4 4 4
Education and Reporting Communica prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear acceptable
Services ted promptly communication of the communication of thecommunication of thecommunication of evidence was
and clearly the learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, the learners’ needs, shown
progress and progress and progress and progress and
learners’ needs, achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
progress and stakehol -ders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
achievement including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/
to key guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as
stakeholders, in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
7.5%
including submitted
parents/ Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No
guardians. combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV acceptable
least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV shown
Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV No
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 was completed in acceptable
quarters quarters quarters only 1 quarter evidence was
shown
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently performed Occasionally Rarely performed No 5 5
Education various related performed various various related work/ performed various various related acceptable
Services works/ related work/activitiesactivities that related work/ work/activities that evidence was
activities that that contribute to the contribute to the activities that contribute to the shown
contribute to teaching learning teaching learning contribute to the teaching learning
the teaching- process as shown in process as shown in teaching learning process as shown
learning 10% the MOV submitted the MOV submitted process as shown in in the MOV
process. the MOV submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 different Submitted any 1 of No
different kinds of kinds of acceptable kinds of acceptable the acceptable MOVacceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV evidence was
shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Very Satisfactory
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MARK ROBLES BUBUNGAN FEBELYN M. ERAMIS MARILYN E. CATEQUISTA
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
EVALUATION

Ave Score

4.500 0.337
 Ave Score

4.500 0.337

4.500 0.337
 Ave Score

5.000 0.375

4.500 0.337
 Ave Score

4.500 0.337

5.000 0.375
 Ave Score

3.000 0.225

4.500 0.337
 Ave Score

4.500 0.337

3.000 0.225
 Ave Score

4.000 0.3

5.000 0.500

actory 4.359
QUISTA
ority