Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Europe
Output: 12,093 MW
USA Plants: 1792
+2,300 MW Engines: 3360
Total Output:
52,943 MW
Plants: 4,675
Engines: 10,520
Countries: 169
Asia
Americas Output: 18,651 MW
Output: 10,660 MW Plants: 1643
Plants: 389 Engines: 3625
Engines: 1317
Africa & Middle East
Output: 11,539 MW
Flexible baseload Plants: 851
Grid stability & peaking Engines: 2718
Industrial self-generation
Oil & gas
* Includes plants on order and in construction
3 © Wärtsilä
Wärtsilä Lifecycle support around the world
4 © Wärtsilä
About Wärtsilä in North America
Wärtsilä USA since 1979.
Currently 650 employees
in North America FINLAND
ITALY
Helsinki, Wärtsilä HQ
Houston, USA HQ
Main Factories
US Service Offices
5 © Wärtsilä
Wärtsilä Gas Engines
» 20V34SG*- 9.3 MW / unit
45% efficiency
» Arranged in parallel
to configure any
size plant in the
~10 to 500+ MW size range
20V34SG-D 18V50SG
Heat Rate*
(LHV) 7,461 Btu/kWh 7,375 Btu/kWh
(HHV) 8,271 Btu/kWh 8,176 Btu/kWh
7 © Wärtsilä
Wärtsilä Duel Fuel Engines
20V34DF 18V50DF
Heat Rate*
(LHV) 7,525 Btu/kWh 7,460 Btu/kWh
(HHV) 8,341 Btu/kWh 8,271 Btu/kWh
Start Time
(min)
2 / 5 / 10 7 / 10
© Wärtsilä 8 © Wärtsilä
Best simple cycle efficiency
9 © Wärtsilä
Loading sequences for power plants
Load % Load %
2 minutes to full load!
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 Additional 60
50 power from 50
40 Wärtsilä plant 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 mins
10 © Wärtsilä
Unloading sequences for power plants
Load % Load %
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 mins
11 © Wärtsilä
Loading and unloading of a W34SG plant
Load % Load %
90 90
80 80
2 min to 1 min full
70 full load unloading 70
60 60
50
Non-spinning reserves Spinning reserves 50
•Available in 30 sec & full output in 2 min •Ramp rate >100 % / min
40 •No fuel consumption & no emissions •Frequency balancing 40
•No wear
30 30
20 20
10 0,5 min to 10
Min. down-time: 5 min
synchronisation Min. load per genset: 30 % (*)
0 0
0 1 2 3/0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 mins
Cycle #1 Cycle #2
12 © Wärtsilä
Cycling of a W34SG plant
Load % Load %
100 100
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 No maintenance impact 30
10 10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 mins
13 © Wärtsilä
Quick Start
·Start up and loading of a Gas Engine power plant compared to a GTCC
120%
Gas Engine
100%
80%
Load [%]
Case Study*
40% STEC Pearsall 24 x W20V34SG Simple Cycle
STEC Sam Rayburn 3 x 1 GE LM6000 Combined Cycle
ERCOT Market at $3,000/MWh $895,000 per start
20%
ERCOT Market at $100/MWh $30,000 per start
ERCOT Market at $30/MWh $10,000 per start
* John Packard, STEC, PowerGen 2011 Presentation
0%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Minutes
GE power GT power
14 © Wärtsilä
Combustion Engines, Multiple unit efficiency
98%
95%
93%
Relative efficiency
90%
88% SPG
Gas Engines
85% GT-HD
Gas Turbine OC
CCGT-HD
Gas Turbine CCGT
83%
80%
78%
75%
50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Relative output
© Wärtsilä
No start penalties & No start-up costs
16 © Wärtsilä
Emissions
17 © Wärtsilä
Noise levels Engine noise at 1 meter: ~ 115 dBA
Power House interior: ~ 110 dBA
Outside: typical design is 65 dBA @ 600 ft
but can meet local requirements
18 © Wärtsilä
Minimum water use
19
19 © Wärtsilä
Low pressure gas
20 © Wärtsilä
Modularity
21 © Wärtsilä
Busting a myth: the power density disadvantage
200 m 90 m
100 m 90 m
© Wärtsilä
Availability and reliability
MW
22x18V50SG
Firm capacity
Days
MW
CCGT (2-2-1)
Firm capacity
Days
Comparison
© Wärtsilä
Light industrial look to the plant
24 © Wärtsilä
Levelized Cost, Capex+Opex
KEMA study (CAISO) & Redpoint (UK) studies…..
To take CAPEX into account (along with OPEX), we can look at levelized cost
25 © Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
Wärtsilä 200 MW vs. Industrial GT (10% cf)
26 © Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
Wärtsilä vs. Industrial GT (200 MW)
80 MUSD
Savings
134 MUSD
20% CF
Savings
27 © Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
Wärtsilä vs. Aero GT (200 MW)
63 MUSD
Savings
85 MUSD
20% CF
Savings
28 © Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
Wärtsilä Flexicycle vs. GTCC 1x1 (300 MW)
Busbar Cost Total Production Cost
30% CF
142 MUSD
Savings
127 MUSD
40% CF
Savings
29 © Wärtsilä
© Wärtsilä
System benefits of Smart Power Generation
SYSTEM BENEFITS VALUE OF SMART
NEED FOR SYSTEM SMART POWER
OF SMART POWER POWER
FLEXIBILITY GENERATION CAN
GENERATION GENERATION
© Wärtsilä
REDUCTION OF CYCLING ON THE GTCC
31 © Wärtsilä
Recent Wärtsilä US Flexible Power 34SG
32 © Wärtsilä
Wärtsilä Smart Power Generation - Texas 34SG
3 x 20V34SG
25 MW – GEUS – Greenville, TX
18 x 20V34SG 170 MW – GSEC - Abernathy, TX
33 © Wärtsilä
GEUS – Greenville, Texas 3 x 20V34SG
25 MW
34
34 © Wärtsilä
STEC – Pearsall, Texas 34SG
© Wärtsilä
12 x 18V50 SG (224 MW)
Wärtsilä Smart Power Generation - Azerbaijan 50SG
21 x 18V50SG
384 MW Boyuk Shor – Baku, Azerbaijan
39 © Wärtsilä
Reciprocating engines in the 21st century
» Reciprocating engines are no longer a
technology only suitable for small-sized
projects or emergency generation
© Wärtsilä
Conclusions
© Wärtsilä
Wärtsilä the Leader in Smart Power Generation
smartpowergeneration.com
John Robbins
Business Development Manager
West Coast Region
Wärtsilä North America, Inc.
(503) 720 – 3081
John.robbins@wartsila.com
42 © Wärtsilä