Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Before the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Punjab & Haryana High Court
Before the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Punjab & Haryana High Court
Complainant Naresh Kadyan son of Ch. Om Parkash Kadyan, C-38, Rose Apartment, Prashant
Vihar, sector-14, Rohini, Delhi – 110085. Jat by birth: Fighter by spirit: Cobbler by profession:
Activist by mission: Humanitarian by choice; Chief National Commissioner, Scouts & Guides for
Animals & Birds; National Authority for Animal Welfare, OIPA – Indian People for Animal
Welfare. WhatsApp: 9813010595 Email: kadyan.ipfa@gmail.com
With support
1. Abhishek Kadyan based in Canada.
2. Mrs. Suman Kadyan based in Canada.
3. Mrs. Sukanya Berwal based in Ahmadabad.
Blessed by:
Ch. Om Parkash Kadyan, BDPO (Rtd) with Mrs. Sharda Kadyan
………………Petitioners.
Versus
1. National Biodiversity Authority, Chennai.
2. Directorate General of Defense Estates, New Delhi.
3. Animal Welfare Board of India, NIAW Campus, Ballabhgarh.
4. Rastriya Kamdhenu Ayog, New Delhi.
5. Chief Secretaries of Haryana, Punjab and UT Chandigarh.
………………Respondents.
INDEX
Before the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Punjab & Haryana High Court
Complainant Naresh Kadyan son of Ch. Om Parkash Kadyan, C-38, Rose Apartment, Prashant
Vihar, sector-14, Rohini, Delhi – 110085. Jat by birth: Fighter by spirit: Cobbler by profession:
Activist by mission: Humanitarian by choice; Chief National Commissioner, Scouts & Guides for
Animals & Birds; National Authority for Animal Welfare, OIPA – Indian People for Animal
Welfare. WhatsApp: 9813010595 Email: kadyan.ipfa@gmail.com
With support
1. Abhishek Kadyan based in Canada.
2. Mrs. Suman Kadyan based in Canada.
3. Mrs. Sukanya Berwal based in Ahmadabad.
Blessed by:
Ch. Om Parkash Kadyan, BDPO (Rtd) with Mrs. Sharda Kadyan
………………Petitioners.
Versus
1. National Biodiversity Authority, Chennai.
2. Directorate General of Defense Estates, New Delhi.
3. Animal Welfare Board of India, NIAW Campus, Ballabhgarh.
4. Rastriya Kamdhenu Ayog, New Delhi.
5. Chief Secretaries of Haryana, Punjab and UT Chandigarh.
………………Respondents.
th
During celebrations of 150 Birth Anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi, Respectfully showeth:
Being Jat by birth, cobbler by profession, activist by mission, fighter by spirit and
humanitarian by choice - It is humbly submitted that:
Kindly refer to the two petitions under RTI Act read with the orders passed by the Deputy
Commissioner, Palwal in case ID No. 55802D2780030816: Case No. 375 of 2016 decided on 25-7-
2016 moved by Lalit Kumar Mandkol, keeping in view CWP No. 26839 of 2016 decided on 22-12-
2016 along with AWBI circular No. 3-1/2017-18/Estt dated 5-3-2018 with replied under RTI vide
No 25-24/2019-20/RTIMIS dated 2-7-2019 reported that AWBI not received compliance report.
In the past, every village or cluster of villages in India was given 5-50 hectares of grazing lands
looking on the cattle population and availability of such land popularly referred to as Gauchar
(grazing) or Panchayat land for the common grazing of the livestock. Owing to increased human
and livestock population, continuous uncontrolled grazing and cutting of woody vegetation,
community grazing lands are deteriorating, besides, a number of the areas are gradually
encroached and given to landless individuals by the government, leading to shrinkage of these
common lands, due to it, increased grazing pressure on the adjacent forest lands, endangering the
very existence of forests. At present for all practical purpose community grazing lands in India
include (1) Panchayat grazing land specifically demarcated for the purpose (2) revenue and other
waste land commonly utilized for grazing and (3) degraded forests land illegally or legally allowed
for grazing.
5
In Haryana, titles of gauchar land changed without competency at the level of Sarpanch, allotted to
the people, for example village Sarai Khatela in Hodal Block of Palwal District, managed to destroy
gauchar land, used for another purpose, besides it titles of gauchar land changed to other purpose
without competency , whereas AWBI asked all Chief Secretaries to follow up the Court of Law
orders vide AWBI circular No. 3-1/2017-18/Estt dated 5-3-2018 with replied under RTI vide No 25-
24/2019-20/RTIMIS dated 2-7-2019 but AWBI reported that they didn’t received compliance
report, hence status report on gochran land may kindly be asked, directing removal of all
encroachments within time limits appointing Court Commission.
1. The National Biodiversity Authority (NBA) was established in 2003 by the Central
Government to implement India’s Biological Diversity Act (2002). The NBA is a statutory
body and that performs facilitative, regulatory and advisory function for Government of
India on issue of Conservation, sustainable use of biological resource and fair equitable
sharing of benefits of use. The Biological diversity Act (2002) mandates implementation of
the provisions of the Act through decentralized system with the NBA focusing on advice the
Central Government on matters relating to the conservation of biodiversity, sustainable use
of its components and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the utilization of biological
resources; advice the State Government in the selection of areas of biodiversity importance
to be notified under Sub-Section (1) of Section 37 as heritage sites and measures for the
management of such heritage sites. The state Biodiversity Board (SBBs) focus on advice the
State Governments, subject to any guidelines issued by the Central Government, on matters
relating to the conservation of biodiversity, sustainable use of its components and equitable
sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of biological resources. The NBA
considers requests by granting approval or otherwise for undertaking ant activity referred
to in Sections 3,4 and 6 of the Act. The SBBs also regulate by granting of approvals or
otherwise upon requests for commercial utilization or bio-survey and bio-utilization of any
biological resource by the Indians. The Local Level Biodiversity Management committees
(BMCs) are responsible for promoting conservation, sustainable use and documentation of
biological diversity including preservation of habitats, conservation of land races, folk
varieties and cultivators, domesticated stocks and breeds of animals and microorganisms
besides chronicling of knowledge relating to biological diversity. The NBA with its
Headquarters in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India delivers its mandate through a structure that
comprises of the Authority, secretariat, SBBs, BMCs and Expert Committees. Since its
establishment, NBA has supported creation of SBBs in 29 States, facilitated establishment
of BMCs to prepare & maintain PBR’s.
2. To prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering on animals, in terms of the
provision of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PCA) Act, 1960; Mandate of Animal
Welfare Board of India, restoring five freedom of all living creatures other than human
beings, whereas without assessing rich species & consumption of meat – chickens along with
its demand, besides it No surplus census of animals & birds to export; No permission
obtained from BMC to misbalance PBR. Even animal & birds are being ill treated, shifting
as goods, vehicles are not approved by the Bureau of Indian Standards, whereas animals
can be transported as per their shape & size instead weight.
3. Wildlife Crime Control Bureau is a statutory multi-disciplinary body established by the
Government of India under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, to combat organized
wildlife crime in the country. Under Section 38 (Z) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, it
is mandated to collect and collate intelligence related to organized wildlife crime activities
and to disseminate the same to State and other enforcement agencies for immediate action
so as to apprehend the criminals; to establish a centralized wildlife crime data bank; co-
6
ordinate actions by various agencies in connection with the enforcement of the provisions of
the Act; assist foreign authorities and international organization concerned to facilitate co-
ordination and universal action for wildlife crime control; capacity building of the wildlife
crime enforcement agencies for scientific and professional investigation into wildlife crimes
and assist State Governments to ensure success in prosecutions related to wildlife crimes;
and advise the Government of India on issues relating to wildlife crimes having national
and international ramifications, relevant policy and laws. It also assists and advises the
Customs authorities in inspection of the consignments of flora & fauna as per the provisions
of Wild Life Protection Act, CITES and EXIM Policy governing such an item.
4. There are 62 notified Cantonments in India occupying an area of 1,57,000 acres: 25 in
Central Command, 19 in Southern Command, 13 in Western Command, 4 in Eastern
Command and one in the Northern Command. In addition 15,96,000 acres is in use for
military garrisons, quartering, camping, offices and training areas.
As per section 41 of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 every local body shall constitute a
Biodiversity Management Committee within its area of jurisdiction, whereas under section
45 of the said Act, the annual reports of the BMCs are to be submitted to the local body of
the concerned area, besides it section 47 of the said Act also mandate the BMCs to submit a
copy of the same to the concerned District Magistrate having jurisdiction of the area of the
local body. It would also be pertinent to mention here that as per section 22 (6)(8-11) of the
Biological Diversity Rules, 2004 that the main function of the BMC is to prepare Peoples
Biodiversity Register in consultation with local people, the Register shall contain
comprehensive information on availability and knowledge of local biological resources,
their medicinal or any other use or any other traditional knowledge associated with them,
whereas:
1. No rich - surplus census of animals & birds, to slaughter for their flesh, bone, blood, hairs.
2. No rich - surplus census of animals & birds, to export for personal gain & profit.
3. Non ISI vehicles shifted animals in overcrowded positions.
4. Biological resources need attention to protect species from extinction.
5. No BMC’s functional & PBR’s maintained all around 62 Cantonments.
6. As per section 22 (2) of the Biological Diversity Act, 2002: Notwithstanding anything
contained in this section, no State Biodiversity Board shall be constituted for a Union
territory and in relation to a Union territory, the National Biodiversity Authority shall
exercise the powers and perform the functions of a State Biodiversity Board for that Union
territory: Provided that in relation to any Union territory, the National Biodiversity
Authority may delegate all or any of its powers or functions under this sub-section to such
person or group of persons as the Central Government may specify.
RTI Request Registration number NBDAT/R/2019/50019
Public Authority National Biodiversity Authority
Mrs. Sukanya Berwal, Commissioner of Education, Scouts & Guides for Animals & Birds
explained that 62 Cantonments are handled, managed under the Cantonment Act, 2006
being Municipality, Biodiversity Management Committees along with Peoples Biodiversity
Registers are being maintained as per Biological Diversity Act, 2002, Rich - extinct species
of flora and fauna also prepared and protected the safe guard of five freedoms as per article
51 of Indian Constitution read with the orders passed by the Court of law, hence supply me
the copies of all communications made and received related to above explained positions
along with the copies of Noting sheets, during the consideration of the communications,
please supply me the following Information along with the concerned Noting sheets, related
to all 62 Cantonments:
7