Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Behavioral Sciences
1
Organizational Behavior/
Behavioral Sciences
2
OB/
Behavioral Science
• No Two People are Alike In All Respects
3
OB/
Behavioral Science
• Behavior = f ( Person x Environment)
– Person
• Cognitive
4
OB/
Behavioral Science
• Behavior = f ( Person x Environment)
– Person
• Cognitive (Analytical, Thinking)
5
OB/
Behavioral Science
• Behavior = f ( Person x Environment)
– Person
• Cognitive (Analytical, Thinking)
• Affective (Emotions)
6
OB/
Behavioral Science
• Behavior = f ( Person x Environment)
– Person
• Cognitive (Analytical, Thinking)
• Affective (Emotions)
– Glad, Sad, Mad, Scared
7
OB/
Behavioral Science
• Behavior = f ( Person x Environment)
– Person
• Cognitive (Analytical, Thinking)
• Affective (Emotions)
– Glad, Sad, Mad, Scared
• Conative
8
OB/
Behavioral Science
• Behavior = f ( Person x Environment)
– Person
• Cognitive (Analytical, Thinking)
• Affective (Emotions)
– Glad, Sad, Mad, Scared
• Conative (Action Orientation, Making a
Difference)
9
Attitudes
• Evaluative statements or judgments concerning
objects, people, or events
• Three components of an attitutde:
– Cognitive (Opinion or belief segment of an attitude)
– Affective (Emotional or feeling part)
– Behavioral (an intention to behave in a certain way
towards the attitude object)
10
Questionnaire F: FIRO-B
• FIRO-B
– Fundamental
– Interpersonal
– Relations
– Orientation
– Behavior
11
Taken Together, Six Cells of FIRO-B
I C A
12
Taken Together, Six Cells of FIRO-B
I C A
e eI eC eA
w wI wC wA
13
An Example of FIRO-B Scores’ Meaning
If FIRO-B scores for an individual ‘X’ look like these:
Row
I C A Sub Total
e 3 8 2 13
w 2 2 3 7
Column
Sub Total
5 10 5
14
An Example of FIRO-B Scores’ Meaning
If FIRO-B scores for an individual ‘X’ look like these:
Row
I C A Sub Total
e 7 2 5 14
w 6 6 6 18
Column
Sub Total
13 8 11
15
FIRO-B
• Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation - Behavior
16
FIRO-B
• Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation - Behavior
17
An Example of FIRO-B Scores’ Meaning
If FIRO-B scores for an individual ‘X’ look like these:
Row
I C A Sub Total
e 3 8 2 13
w 2 2 3 7
Column
Sub Total
5 10 5
18
FIRO-B Scores and
Reciprocal Compatibility
• In inter-personal relationships, reciprocal compatibility
in terms of INCLUSION:
– If first person has high score in eI and the second has
high score in wI
or
– If first person has high score in wI and the second
person has high score in eI
19
FIRO-B Scores and Reciprocal Compatibility
X’S FIRO-B SCORES Y’S FIRO-B SCORES
I C A I C A
e 5 2 4 e 3 6 3
w 0 4 0 w 1 1 4
21
Leadership
22
Language Cues of Various
Points of View
• Follower’s Point of View
– What do you want me to do?
– Will you give me more authority?
– I need you to clear the obstacles for me.
• Bureaucrat’s Point of View
– That’s not my job
– I’ll pass that on to so-and-so.
– Our procedures don’t allow that.
– We’ve never done it that way.
– This hasn’t been approved
– I can’t do that without my supervisor’s permission
– Have you filled out the form yet?
23
Language Cues of Various
Points of View
• Administrator’s Point of View
– What was this done last time?
– We’ve never done it that way.
– Let’s see what was the rule on that?
– This is too different from what we have done before.
• Contrarian’s Point of View
– That’ll never work
– That’s a terrible idea.
– You won’t be able to fund it.
– You’ll never be able to do it in time.
– Yeah, but …
24
Language Cues of Various
Points of View
• Leader’s Point of View
25
Language Cues of Various
Points of View
• Your Leader’s Point of View will come from
raising some of these questions:
– Do you see what needs to be done?
– Do you understand the underlying forces at play?
– Do you have the courage to initiate action to make
things better?
26
Leadership: Trait Theories (early 1900s)
Theories that consider personality, social, physical,
or intellectual traits to differentiate leaders from
nonleaders
Leadership Traits
Extroversion
Traits can predict leadership, but they are better at
predicting leader emergence than effectiveness
27
Leadership: Trait Theories (early 1900s)
Theories that consider personality, social, physical,
or intellectual traits to differentiate leaders from
nonleaders
Leadership Traits
Extroversion
Traits can predict leadership, but they are better at
predicting leader emergence than effectiveness
28
Behavioral Theories of Leadership
(1940s through 1960s)
• Theories proposing that specific behaviors
differentiate leaders from nonleaders
Differences between theories of leadership:
Trait theory - leadership is inherent, so we must identify
the leader based on his or her traits
Behavioral theory - leadership is a skill set and can be
taught to anyone, so we must identify the proper
behaviors to teach potential leaders
29
Important Behavioral Theories of Leadership
• Ohio State University
– Found two key dimensions of leader behavior
• Initiating structure – the defining and structuring of roles
• Consideration – job relationships that reflect trust and respect
Both are important
University of Michigan
Also found two key dimensions of leader behavior
Employee-oriented – emphasizes interpersonal relationships
and is the most powerful dimension
Production-oriented – emphasizes the technical aspects of the
job
Notice that the two dimensions identified at Ohio
State/University of Michigan are similar 30
Reddin (1970): Basic Leadership Styles
High
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Low Task
Low Orientation High
(TO)
31
Reddin (1970): Basic Leadership Styles
High
Low TO, High RO High TO, High RO
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Low TO, Low RO High TO, Low RO
Low Task
Low Orientation High
(TO)
32
Reddin (1970): Basic Leadership Styles
High
Related Integrated
(Low T, High R) (High T, High R)
Relationship
Orientation
(R)
Separated Dedicated
(Low T, Low R) (High T, Low R)
Low Task
Low Orientation High
(T)
33
Reddin (1970): Basic Leadership Styles
High
Related Integrated
(Low TO, High RO) (High TO, High RO)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Separated Dedicated
(Low TO, Low RO) (High TO, Low RO)
Low Task
Low Orientation High
(TO)
34
Less Effective Manifestation
of
Basic Leadership Styles
35
What Basic Leadership Style do
‘S’ Statements Represent?
High
Related Integrated
(Low TO, High RO) (High TO, High RO)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Separated Dedicated
(Low TO, Low RO) (High TO, Low RO)
Low Task
Low Orientation High
(TO)
36
Less Effective Manifestation of
Basic Leadership Styles
High
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Deserter (S)
Low
Low Task High
Orientation
(TO)
37
Less Effective Manifestation
of
Basic Leadership Styles
38
What Basic Leadership Style do
‘T’ Statements Represent?
High
Related Integrated
(Low TO, High RO) (High TO, High RO)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Separated Dedicated
(Low TO, Low RO) (High TO, Low RO)
Low Task
Low Orientation High
(TO)
39
Less Effective Manifestation of
Basic Leadership Styles
High
Missionary (T)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Deserter (S)
Low
Low Task High
Orientation
(TO)
40
Less Effective Manifestation
of
Basic Leadership Styles
41
What Basic Leadership Style do
‘U’ Statements Represent?
High
Related Integrated
(Low TO, High RO) (High TO, High RO)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Separated Dedicated
(Low TO, Low RO) (High TO, Low RO)
Low Task
Low Orientation High
(TO)
42
Less Effective Manifestation of
Basic Leadership Styles
High
Missionary (T)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Deserter (S) Autocrat (U)
Low
Low Task High
Orientation
(TO)
43
Less Effective Manifestation
of
Basic Leadership Styles
44
What Basic Leadership Style do
‘V’ Statements Represent?
High
Related Integrated
(Low TO, High RO) (High TO, High RO)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Separated Dedicated
(Low TO, Low RO) (High TO, Low RO)
Low Task
Low Orientation High
(TO)
45
Less Effective Manifestation of
Basic Leadership Styles
High
Missionary (T) Compromiser (V)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Deserter (S) Autocrat (U)
Low
Low Task High
Orientation
(TO)
46
Less Effective Manifestation
of
Basic Leadership Styles
47
Please raise your right hand if ….
48
Broad Advice
49
More Effective Manifestation
of
Basic Leadership Styles
50
More Effective Manifestation of
Basic Leadership Styles
High
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Bureaucrat (W)
Low
Low Task High
Orientation
(TO)
51
More Effective Manifestation
of
Basic Leadership Styles
52
More Effective Manifestation of
Basic Leadership Styles
High
Developer (X)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Bureaucrat (W)
Low
Low Task High
Orientation
(TO)
53
More Effective Manifestation
of
Basic Leadership Styles
54
More Effective Manifestation of
Basic Leadership Styles
High
Developer (X)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Bureaucrat (W) Benevolent Autocrat
(Y)
Low
Low Task High
Orientation
(TO)
55
More Effective Manifestation
of
Basic Leadership Styles
56
More Effective Manifestation of
Basic Leadership Styles
High
Developer (X) Executive (Z)
Relationship
Orientation
(RO)
Bureaucrat (W) Benevolent Autocrat
(Y)
Low
Low Task High
Orientation
(TO)
57
Let us do a Fill in the Blank ….
58
Fill in the Blank …
• We had to distribute 10 points on each page
• We had the freedom to choose only one of the eight
alphabets (S,T,U,V,W,X,Y,Z) and give all 10 points to that
alphabet
• If we gave all 10 points to only one alphabet and to the
same alphabet on each page, the alphabet to which we
should give those 10 points is ____?
59
Using ‘Inventory of Managerial Styles’
as a trigger for change
60
Organizational Change and Leadership
• A style of leadership that is associated with
effective organizational change is called
transformational leadership
61
State Bank of India
62
Why SBI needed to change?
63
What steps O P Bhatt took?
64
Did you make a FIRO-B picture of
O P Bhatt?
65
Lewin’s Force Field Theory of Change
66
THANK YOU
67