Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Education Department
Dogan B., & Almus K.(2014). School administrators’ use of iPads: Impact of
INTRODUCTION
duties?
2. What is the impact of the training process on school administrators’ beliefs
METHODOLOGY
Participants:
Procedures:
school systems after receiving approvals from the school district and the
university.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the school district and the university
semester and the post survey was given at the end of the four-month study
period.
- Both instruments were reviewed for face validity by two education faculty
- After the feedback of the pilot versions, the questionnaires were completed.
Two survey tools as a data collection mechanism were used online through
Data Analysis:
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software was used to
conduct the data analysis. Survey instruments included multiple choice and
differences in the responses between the pre- and post-surveys. Six one-way
ANOVA tests and one t test were used to understand the differences in
iPad applications
- impacts of the training process on school administrators’ beliefs regarding
RESULTS
- Administrators believe that iPads are effective tools for administrative tasks
they also desired ongoing training and resources on using iPads for
classroom.
they wanted their teachers use iPad to teach in the classroom using iPad.
DISCUSSIONS
using iPads for professional tasks, especially for administrative and personal
in the schools. So using IPad by administrators will help them perform work-
related tasks and will also affect the successful implementation of iPads by
REFLECTIONS
your school/work):
demonstrate the potential benefits of iPad at school. This should include not
only educational benefits but also other domains such as productivity, resource
References
Dogan B., & Almus K.(2014). School administrators’ use of iPads: Impact of