Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 37

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: DEVIE JOY T. JOVEN Name of Rater: ALMA C


Position: LSB TEACHER Position: MAST
Bureau/Center/Service/DivDIVISION OF SOUTH COTABATO Date of Review: APR
Rating Period: APRIL 1, 2018- MARCH 31, 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING


Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of Showed Showed Showed Showed
Services and content knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of
Pedagogy within and content and its content and its content and its content and its
across integration within integration within integration within integration within
curriculum and across and across and across and across
teaching subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as subject areas as
areas. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1
4 lessons using lessons using lessons using of the given MOV
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any supported by any supported by any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using
Education range of different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching
Services teaching strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
that enhance writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
learner numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
schievement as shown in MOV as shown in MOV shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
in literacy 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
and 7 6
numeracy 7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
skills 4 learner- learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered
centered lessons lessons as lessons as lessons as
as evidently evidently shown evidently shown in evidently shown in
shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the other
and supported by supported by any supported by any given MOV
any 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different
Education Knowledge range of teaching teaching teaching teaching
Services and teaching strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
Pedagogy strategies to develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical
develop and creative and creative and creative and creative
critical and
creative
Services and teaching
Pedagogy strategies to
develop and creative and creative and creative and creative
critical and thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
creative and/or other and/or other and/or other and/or other
thinking, as HOTS as shown HOTS as shown HOTS as shown HOTS as shown
well as other 7.5% in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
higher order Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
thinking 4 lessons as lessons as lessons as lesson as
skills. evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by any
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and of the other given
supported by any supported by any supported by any MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Quality Used classroom Used classroom
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed
Education Environme classroom management management Used classroom Used classroom
Services nt and structure to strategies that strategies that management management
Diversity of engage engage learners engage learners strategies that strategies that
Learners learners, in activities/tasks in activities/tasks engage learners engage learners in
individually as shown in MOV as shown in MOV in activities/tasks activities/tasks as
1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of as shown in MOV shown in MOV 1
or in groups,
7.5% 7 6 1 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
in meanigful Submitted at least Submitted 3
exploration, Efficiency Submitted 1
4 lessons lessons Submitted 2
discovery lesson supported
supported by supported by lessons supported
and hands- by any of the
MOV 1 and any 1 MOV 1 and any 1 by MOV 1 and
on activities acceptable MOV
of the other of the other any 1 of the other
within a acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
range of Timeliness
physical
Basic 5. Managed
learning Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher
Education learner
environment management management management management
Services behavior
s. strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of
constructivel learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior
y by applying that promote that promote that promote that promote
positive and positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
non-violent violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline
discipline to as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
ensure submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
learning- rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
7.5%
focused
environment Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at Submitted at least Submitted any 1
4 of the given least 4 of the 4 of the given of the given
strategies as given strategies strategies as strategies as
observed in at as observed in 3 observed in 2 observed in only 1
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Applied
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied
differentiated
Education Environme differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated
Services nt and , teaching teaching teaching teaching
Diversity of development strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
Learners ally address learner address learner address learner address learner
appropriate diversity as diversity as diversity as shown diversity as shown
shown in MOV 1
learning shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
with a rating of 6
experiences with a rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
to address Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1
learners’ 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated
7.5% teaching teaching teaching teaching strategy
gender,
needs, strategies in at strategies in at strategies in 2 in only 1 lesson
strengths, least 2 lessons least 2 lessons lessons as as evidently
interests and as evidenced by as evidenced by evidenced by shown in any 1 of
experiences. MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and the acceptable
supported by any supported by any supported by any MOV
strengths,
interests and as evidenced by as evidenced by evidenced by shown in any 1 of
experiences. MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and the acceptable
supported by any supported by any supported by any MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and
Education Curriculum managed implemented implemented implemented implemented
Services and and developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
Planning implemented sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced
development teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
ally learning process learning process learning process learning process
sequenced as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
teaching and 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating of 4
learning 7 6
processes to Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
meet 7.5% 4 developmentally developmentally developmentally
curriculum developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced
requirements sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
and varied teaching and learning process learning process learning process
teaching learning process as evidently as evidently as evidently
contexts. as evidently shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any 1 of
shown in MOV 1 and supported by and supported by the given MOV
and supported by any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
any 1 of the other given MOV given MOV
given MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic 3. 8. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely
Education Curriculum Participated participated in participated in participated in participated in
Services and in collegial LACs/FGDs/meeti LACs/FGDs/meet LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/
Planning discussions ngs to discuss ings to discuss meetings to meeting to discuss
that use teacher/learner teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner
teacher and feedback to feedback to teacher/learner feedback to enrich
learner enrich instruction enrich instruction feedback to enrich instruction as
feedback to as shown in the as shown in the instruction as shown in the MOV
enrich 7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
teaching submitted
practice. Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1
least 4 LACs/FGDs/meet LACs/FGDs/meeti LAC/FGD/meeting
LACs/FGDs/meeti ings as evidently ngs as evidently as evidently
ngs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV the given MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and
Education developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied
Services organized teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
and used learning learning learning learning
appropriate resources, resources, resources, resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources,
teaching and
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown goals as shown in goals as shown in
including MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
ICT, to rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
address Efficiency Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any
7.5% Submitted at least
learning varied teaching varied teaching teaching and
goals. 4 varied teaching and learning and learning learning resource,
and learning resources, resources, including ICT, as
resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as evidently shown in
including ICT, as evidently shown evidently shown in any of the
evidently shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
in MOV 1 and supported by any supported by any
supported by any 1 of the 1 of the
1 of the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic 4. 10. Quality Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed,
Education Assessmen Designed, selected, selected, selected, selected,
Services t and selected, organized and organized and organized and organized and
Reporting organized used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic, used diagnostic,
and used formative and formative and formative and formative and
diagnostic, summative summative summative summative
formative assessment assessment assessment assessment
and strategies strategies strategies strategies
summative consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
assessment curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
strategies requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
7.5%
consistent shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
curriculum
requirements Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
. 4 varied varied varied assessment tool
assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools as evidently
as evidently as evidently as evidently shown in any of
shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of the acceptable
the acceptable the acceptable the acceptable MOV
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic 11. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored
Education Monitored monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated
Services and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress
evaluated progress and progress and progress and and achievement
learner achievement achievement achievement using learner
progress and using learner using learner using learner attainment data as
achievement attainment data attainment data attainment data shown in the MOV
using learner as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the submitted
attainment 7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
data. Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1
combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 acceptable MOV
least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 acceptable MOV
least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
TimelinessSubmitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2)
Basic 4. 12.Communi Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely showed
Education Assessmen ca ted showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt prompt and clear
Services t and promptly and and clear and clear and clear communication of
Reporting clearly the communication of communication of communication of the learners’
learners’ the learners’ the learners’ the learners’ needs, progress
needs, needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress and achievement
progress and and achievement and achievement and achievement to key
achievement to key to key to key stakeholders,
to key stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, including parents/
stakeholders including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ guardians as
, including 7.5% guardians as guardians as guardians as shown in the MOV
parents/ shown in the shown in the shown in the MOV submitted
guardians. MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted
Efficienc Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1
y combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 of the given MOV
least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
TimelinessSubmitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter
Basic 5. Plus 13. Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed
Education Factor Performed performed various performed performed various various related
Services various related various related related work/activities that
related work/activities work/activities work/activities that contribute to the
works/activiti that contribute to that contribute to contribute to the teaching learning
es that the teaching the teaching teaching learning process as shown
contribute to learning process learning process process as shown in the MOV
the teaching- 10% as shown in the as shown in the in the MOV submitted
learning MOV submitted MOV submitted submitted
process.
Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1
4 different kinds different kinds of different kinds of of the acceptable
of acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
TimelinessMOV

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory DEVIE JOY T. JOVEN ALMA C. MANCHURES
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater
MENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
ALMA C. MANCHURES
MASTER TEACHER I
APRIL 1-25, 2019

NNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337


evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337
evidence was
shown
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable 4 3 3.500 0.262


evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300


evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable 4 3 3.500 0.262
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.3
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable 3 3 3.000 0.225
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable 4 5 4.500 0.337


evidence was
shown
No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable 4 3 3.5 0.262
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable 4 4 4.000 0.300


evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(1) Q E T
No acceptable 3 3 3 0.225
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown
No acceptable 3 3 3.000 0.300
evidence was
shown

No acceptable
evidence was
shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL


Very Satisfactory 3.784
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ALMA C. MANCHURES SIMPLICIO T. BALLEZA JR. Ph.D.
Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUM
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: EVELYN S. BERBER Name of Rater:


Position: TEACHER I Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SOUTH COTABATO Date of Review:
Rating Period: JUNE 2018- MARCH 2019

Weight Numerical Ratings


Weight per
KRA Objectives per
KRA Q E T
Objective
Objective 1 7.5% 5 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 5
Objective 3 7.5% 5 5
Objective 4 7.5% 4 4
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5 5
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4
Objective 7 7.5% 4 4
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 2 2
Objective 9 7.5% 5 5
Objective 10 7.5% 4 4
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 3 0
Objective 12 7.5% 5 3 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 4
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating

EVELYN S. BERBER ARDENITA E. SANICO


Ratee Rater
ORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
r)

ARDENITA E. SANICO
MASTER TEACHER I

cal Ratings
Score
Ave
4.500 0.337
4.500 0.337
4.500 0.337
3.500 0.262
4.000 0.300
3.500 0.262
4.000 0.300
3.000 0.225
4.500 0.337
3.500 0.262
4.000 0.300
3.000 0.225
3.000 0.300
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 3.784

SIMPLICIO T. BALLEZA JR. Ph.D.


Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT A

Name of Employee: DIVINA E. BALLEZA Name of Rater:


Position: MASTER TEACHER I Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:DIVISION OF SOUTH COTABATO Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance I
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Education Knowledge applications of Modeled effective Modeled effective
Services and Pedagogy content knowledge applications of applications of
within and across content knowledge content knowledge
curriculum teaching within and across within and across
areas. curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7
7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons
lessons as evidenced as evidenced by
by MOV 1 and MOV 1 from
supported by any 1 of colleagues and
the other MOV given supported by any 1
of the other MOV
given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and
Education colleagues in the completed and completed action
Services conduct and disseminated action research with
application of research with colleagues
research to enrich colleagues
knowledge of
content and
pedagogy. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV
7.5%

Timeliness Presented the Completed the


research report within research report
the rating period within the rating
period
the rating period within the rating
period

Performance I
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated
Education Knowledge applied effective effective teaching effective teaching
Services and Pedagogy teaching strategies strategies to promote strategies to
to promote critical critical and creative promote critical and
and creative thinking, as well as creative thinking, as
thinking, as well as other higher-order well as other higher-
other higher-order thinking skills as order thinking skills
thinking skills. shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1
a rating of 8 with a rating of 7

7.5%

Efficiency Submitted 4 or more Submitted 3 lessons


lessons as evidently as evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1
the other MOV given of the other MOV
given

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality
Education Environment colleagues to model
Services and Diversity and share effective
of Learners techniques in the
management of Modeled and shared Modeled and shared
classroom structure effective classroom effective classroom
to engage learners, management management
individually or in strategies that strategies that
classroom structure effective classroom effective classroom
to engage learners, management management
individually or in strategies that strategies that
groups, in engage learners in engage learners in
meaningful activities/ tasks done activities/ tasks
exploration, in different physical done in different
discovery and learning physical learning
hands-on activities 7.5% environments as environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1
physical learning a rating of 8 with a rating of 7
environments.enviro Efficiency
nments.
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons
lessons supported by supported by MOV
MOV 1 and any 1 of 1 and any 1 of the
the other acceptable other acceptable
MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance I
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)

Basic 2. Learning 5. Exhibited Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective


Education Environment effective and and constructive and constructive
Services and Diversity constructive behavior behavior
of Learners behavior management skills by management skills
management skills applying positive and by applying positive
by applying positive non-violent discipline and non-violent
and non-violent to ensure learning- discipline to ensure
discipline to ensure focused environments learning-focused
learning-focused shown in MOV 1 with environments
environments. a rating of 8 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 7

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of


the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3
Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of
the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3
least 4 lessons lessons

Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with
Education colleagues to share colleagues at least in colleagues in the
Services differentiated, the district/cluster department or grade
developmentally level to share lesson level to share lesson
appropriate
opportunities to
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
address learners’
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
differences in 7.5% shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1
gender, needs,
supported by any and supported by
strengths, interests
acceptable MOV any acceptable
and experiences.
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and
Education and Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective
Services strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
developmentally and learning process and learning
sequenced teaching as shown in MOV 1 process as shown in
and learning with a rating of 8 MOV 1 with a rating
processes to meet of 7
curriculum
requirements and 7.5%
varied teaching Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3
contexts. lessons as evidenced lessons as
by MOV 1 and 2 and evidenced by MOV
supported by any 1 of 1 and 2 and
the other acceptable supported by any 1
MOV of the other
acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Performance I
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic 3. Curriculum 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led
Education and Planning colleagues, teacher participated in collaborative
Services and learner LACs/FGDs/meetings reviews of teacher
feedback to plan, to discuss and learner
facilitate and enrich teacher/learner feedback as
Services and learner LACs/FGDs/meetings reviews of teacher
feedback to plan, to discuss and learner
facilitate and enrich teacher/learner feedback as
teaching practice. feedback to enrich evidenced by the
instruction as shown MOV submitted
in the MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3


collaborative reviews collaborative
7.5% of teacher and learner reviews of teacher
feedback as evidently and learner
shown in MOV 1 and feedback as
supported by any 1 of evidently shown in
the acceptable MOV MOV 1 and
supported by any 1
of the acceptable
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 9. Advised and Quality Consistently advised Frequently advised
Education guided colleagues colleagues in the colleagues in the
Services in the selection, selection, selection,
organization, organization, organization,
development and development and development and
use of appropriate appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and teaching and learning teaching and
learning resources, resources as shown learning resources
including ICT, to in the MOV submitted as shown in the
address specific MOV submitted
learning goals. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
teaching and learning teaching and
resources as learning resources
evidenced by at least as evidenced by at
1 of the acceptable least 1 of the
MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently reviewed Frequently reviewed
Education and Reporting collaboratively with collaboratively collaboratively
Services colleagues to review assessment tools with assessment tools
the design, colleagues as shown with colleagues as
selection, in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
organization and submitted
use of a range of
effective diagnostic,
formative and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3
summative assessment tools as assessment tools as
assessment 7.5% evidently shown in evidently shown in
strategies any of the acceptable any of the
MOV acceptable MOV
summative
assessment 7.5% evidently shown in evidently shown in
strategies any of the acceptable any of the
consistent with MOV acceptable MOV
curriculum
requirements.

Timeliness

Performance I
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4)
Basic 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently
Education and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with
Services monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation interpretation of interpretation of
strategies of assessment data as assessment data as
attainment data to shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
support learner 7.5% submitted submitted
progress and
achievement. Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3
different types of of the same kind of
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in Quality Consistently applied Frequently applied
Education the effective skills in the effective skills in the effective
Services communication of communication of communication of
learner needs, learner needs and learner needs and
progress and progress to parents/ progress to parents/
achievement to key guardians as shown guardians as shown
stakeholders, in the MOV submitted in the MOV
including submitted
parents/guardians.
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3


of the acceptable MOV
MOV

Timeliness
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently
Education various related performed special performed special
Services works/activities that tasks and/or tasks and/or
contribute to the assignments as assignments as
teaching-learning shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
process. submitted submitted

10%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3
different kinds of different kinds of
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3
different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory DIVINA E. BALLEZA
below 1.499 Poor Ratee
TMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

SIMPLICIO T. BALLEZA JR. Ph.D.


PRINCIPAL III
APRIL 16, 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

ormance Indicators Rating


Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave

(3) (2) (1) Q E T


No acceptable Modeled effective 5 5 5.000
Modeled effective evidence was applications of content
applications of Modeled effective shown knowledge within and
content knowledge applications of content across curriculum
within and across knowledge within and teaching areas as
curriculum teaching across curriculum shown in MOV 1 with
areas as shown in teaching areas as a rating of 7
MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with
of 6 a rating of 5
Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable Submitted at least 4
as evidenced by evidenced by MOV 1 evidence was lessons as evidenced
MOV 1 from from colleagues and shown by MOV 1 and
colleagues and supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
supported by any 1 the other MOV given the other MOV given
of the other MOV
given

Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable Proposedaction 2 2 2 2.000


research with research with evidence was research with
colleagues colleagues shown colleagues

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 MOV No acceptable


MOV evidence was
shown
Proposedaction
research with
colleagues
Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report within evidence was
within the rating the rating period shown
period
within the rating the rating period shown
period

ormance Indicators Rating


Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave

(3) (2) (1) Q E T


Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable Demonstrated 5 5 5.000
effective teaching effective teaching evidence was effective teaching
strategies to strategies to promote shown strategies to promote
promote critical and critical and creative critical and creative
creative thinking, as thinking, as well as thinking, as well as
well as other higher- other higher-order other higher-order
order thinking skills thinking skills as thinking skills as
as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
with a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 8

Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable Submitted 4 or more


as evidently shown evidently shown in evidence was lessons as evidently
in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported shown shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 by any of the other supported by any 1 of
of the other MOV MOV given the other MOV given
given

No acceptable 4 4 4.000
evidence was
shown

Modeled and shared


effective classroom Modeled and shared Modeled and shared
management effective classroom effective classroom
strategies that management management
effective classroom Modeled and shared Modeled and shared
management effective classroom effective classroom
strategies that management management
engage learners in strategies that engage strategies that engage
activities/ tasks done learners in activities/ learners in activities/
in different physical tasks done in different tasks done in different
learning physical learning physical learning
environments as environments as environments as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
with a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 8
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
supported by any of evidence was
Submitted 2 lessons the acceptable MOV shown Submitted at least 4
supported by MOV 1 lessons supported by
and any 1 of the MOV 1 and any 1 of
other acceptable the other acceptable
MOV MOV

ormance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
(3) (2) (1) Q E T

Exhibited effective Exhibited effective and No acceptable Exhibited effective and 4 4 4.000
and constructive constructive behavior evidence was constructive behavior
behavior management skills by shown management skills by
management skills applying positive and applying positive and
by applying positive non-violent discipline non-violent discipline
and non-violent to ensure learning- to ensure learning-
discipline to ensure focused environments focused environments
learning-focused shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
environments shown a rating of 5 a rating of 7
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 6

Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable Applied at least 7 of


the given strategies given strategies as evidence was the given strategies as
as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown observed in 3 lessons
Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable Applied at least 7 of
the given strategies given strategies as evidence was the given strategies as
as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown observed in 3 lessons
lessons lesson

Worked with Worked with No acceptable Worked with 4 4 4.000


colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was colleagues at least in
evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown the district/cluster
with others with others level to share lesson

Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 1


lesson as evidently lesson, as evidenced evidence was lesson as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and by either MOV 2 or 3 shown shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any but no evidence of supported by any
acceptable MOV sharing with others acceptable MOV

Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and 4 4 4.000


applied effective applied effective evidence was applied effective
strategies showing strategies showing shown strategies showing
developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
and learning process and learning process and learning process
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 8

Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable Submitted 2-3 lessons


as evidenced by evidenced by any 1 of evidence was as evidenced by MOV
shown in MOV 1 the acceptable MOV shown 1 and 2 and supported
and/or 2 and by any 1 of the other
supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
of the other
acceptable MOV

ormance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable Consistently 3 3 3.000
collaborative reviews collaborative reviews evidence was participated in
of teacher and of teacher and learner shown LACs/FGDs/meetings
learner feedback as feedback as to discuss
evidenced by the evidenced by the teacher/learner
of teacher and of teacher and learner shown LACs/FGDs/meetings
learner feedback as feedback as to discuss
evidenced by the evidenced by the teacher/learner
MOV submitted MOV submitted feedback to enrich
instruction as shown in
the MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3


collaborative reviews collaborative review of evidence was collaborative reviews
of teacher and teacher and learner shown of teacher and learner
learner feedback as feedback as evidently feedback as evidently
evidently shown in shown in any of the shown in MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and acceptable MOV supported by any 1 of
supported by any 1 the acceptable MOV
of the acceptable
MOV

Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable Consistently advised 4 4 4.000


advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was colleagues in the
in the selection, selection, shown selection,
organization, organization, organization,
development and development and development and
appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
teaching and teaching and learning teaching and learning
learning resources resources as shown in resources as shown in
as shown in the the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
MOV submitted

Submitted 2 Submitted 1 teaching No acceptable Submitted 3 teaching


teaching and and learning resource evidence was and learning
learning resources as evidenced by any shown resources as
as evidenced by at of the acceptable evidenced by at least
least 1 of the MOV 1 of the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV

Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable Frequently reviewed 4 4 4.000


reviewed collaboratively evidence was collaboratively
collaboratively assessment tools with shown assessment tools with
assessment tools colleagues as shown colleagues as shown
with colleagues as in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted
Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 2
assessment tools as assessment tool as evidence was assessment tools as
evidently shown in evidently shown in any shown evidently shown in any
any of the of the acceptable of the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
evidently shown in evidently shown in any shown evidently shown in any
any of the of the acceptable of the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

ormance Indicators
Rating
Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave
(3) (2) (1) Q E T
Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable Consistently 4 4 4
collaborated with with colleagues in the evidence was collaborated with
colleagues in the interpretation of shown colleagues in the
interpretation of assessment data as interpretation of
assessment data as shown in the MOV assessment data as
shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
submitted submitted

Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable Submitted at least 3 of


of the same kind of MOV evidence was the same kind of MOV
MOV shown

Occasionally applied Rarely applied skills in No acceptable Consistently applied 4 4 4.000


skills in the effective the effective evidence was skills in the effective
communication of communication of shown communication of
learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and
progress to parents/ progress to parents/ progress to parents/
guardians as shown guardians as shown in guardians as shown in
in the MOV the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
submitted

Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 MOV Submitted at least 4 of


MOV the acceptable MOV

Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Consistently 5 5 5.000


performed special special tasks and/or evidence was performed special
tasks and/or assignments as shown tasks and/or
assignments as shown in the MOV assignments as shown
shown in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
submitted

Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable Submitted at least 4


different kinds of acceptable MOV evidence was different kinds of
Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable Submitted at least 4
different kinds of acceptable MOV evidence was different kinds of
acceptable MOV shown acceptable MOV

RATING FOR OVER-ALL


ACCOMPLISHMENTS Very Satisfactory

SIMPLICIO T. BALLEZA JR. Ph.D. CARLOS G. SUSARNO, Ph.D.


Rater Approving Authority
. BALLEZA JR. Ph.D.
INCIPAL III
RIL 16, 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Score

0.375

0.150
Score

0.375

0.3
Score

0.3
0.3

0.3

Score

0.225
0.3

0.300
Score

0.3

0.300

0.500
4.025

CARLOS G. SUSARNO, Ph.D.


Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUM
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: NENA L. CASTOR Name of Rater:


Position: MASTER TEACHER II Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Divis DIVISION OF SOUTH COTABATO Date of Review:
Rating Period: APRIL 2018- MARCH 2019

Weight Weight per Numerical Ratings


KRA Objectives
per KRA Objective Q E T
Objective 1 7.5% 4 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 2 2 2
Objective 3 7.5% 5 5
Objective 4 7.5% 4 4
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4
Objective 7 7.5% 4 4
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 3 3
Objective 9 7.5% 4 4
Objective 10 7.5% 4 4
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4 4
Objective 12 7.5% 4 4
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5
Final Rating
Adjectival Rating

NENA L. CASTOR MARILIL S. ORTIZ


Ratee Rater
FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
nt Teacher)

MARILIL S. ORTIZ
PRINCIPAL I
APRIL, 2016

al Ratings
Score
Ave
5.000 0.375
2.000 0.150
5.000 0.375
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
3.000 0.225
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
5.000 0.500
Final Rating 4.025
Adjectival Rating Very Satisfactory

CARLOS G. SUSARNO Ph.D.


Special Assistant to the Schools
Division
Division Superintendent
Superintendent
Approving Authority

Вам также может понравиться