Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
R.J. Nicholas
• Alkali metals (K, Na, Rb) and Noble metals (Cu, Ag,
Au) have filled shell + 1 outer s-electron.
• Atomic s-electrons are delocalised due to overlap of
outer orbits.
• Crystal looks like positive ion cores of charge +e
embedded in a sea of conduction electrons
• Conduction electrons can interact with each other and
ion cores but these interactions are weak because:
Assumptions:
L
Put free electrons into a very wide potential well the
same size as the crystal i.e. they are 'de-localised'
with:
Momentum: Energy: Group velocity:
∂ψ = 2 ∂ 2ψ =2k 2 ∂ω 1 ∂E =k
i= = ± =k ψ − = ψ = =
∂x 2m ∂x 2 2m ∂k = ∂k m
L L
Add a second piece of crystal the same size:
The properties must be the same.
Density of states
Calculate allowed values of k. ψ ( x) = ψ ( x + L)
Use periodic (Born-von Karman) ∴ e ikx = e ik ( x + L )
boundary conditions:
∴ e ikL = 1
2π 4π
L = size of crystal ∴ k = 0, ± , ±
L L
2π
∴δk =
L
=⎜ ⎟
dε ⎝ =2 ⎠ 2ε
1
2
⎛ 2m ⎞
3
2 1
= 4π ⎜ 2 ⎟ ε 2
dε × V
⎝h ⎠
Fermi Energy
∞
μ
at T = 0 N = ∫ g (ε ) d ε
0
3
N 8π ⎛ 2mEF ⎞ 2
n= = ⎜ ⎟
V 3 ⎝ h2 ⎠
μ at T = 0 is known as the 2
⎛ 3N ⎞ 3
h2
Fermi Energy, EF EF = ⎜ ⎟
⎝ 8π V ⎠ 2m
∴ ΔE ≈ kB2T2 g(EF)
Is this significant?
Lattice Electrons
Room
Temperature 3nat.kB π2/2 nkB (kBT/EF)
C/T = βT2 + γ
Debye term free electron term
∞ ∂f F − D
U = ∫ ε g (ε ) f F − D (ε ) d ε ?
∂T
0
∂U
∞
∂f 1 ε − μ
∴ = ∫ ε g (ε ) dε f = x
, x=
e + 1 kT
∂T 0
∂T
∂f − ex ∂x
∞
x e dx 2 x = ×
∫ ( )
2
= g ( EF ) k B T
2
+ δ ∂T ex + 1 ∂T
(e )
2
x
− EF + 1
k BT ∞
x e x dx
π2 ≈−∞
δ ∝ ∫
(e )
2 2
= g ( EF ) k B T − EF
x
+ 1
3 k BT
= 0 (why?)
Magnetic susceptibility
μ B2 μ0
χ= / electron
kT
• This is much bigger than is found experimentally
- Why?
= 2k 2
T=0 states filled up to EF ∴ = EF
2m
4π k F3
N = 2×
or we can write: 3 ⎛⎜ 2π ⎞⎟ 3
⎝ L ⎠
3π 2 N
∴ k F3 =
V
= 2k 2
T=0 states filled up to EF ∴ = EF
2m
E 2mEF
∴ kF =
=2
EF
k
kF
k
kF
δk
eEτ
On average all electrons shifted by: δk = −
=
Fermi sphere is shifted in k-space by δk << kF
∴ To relax electron momentum k must be changed by ~ kF
Scattering occurs at EF
∴ we need phonons with large value of k. But phonon energy is small
so only a small fraction of electrons kBT/εF can be scattered
Scattering processes
m
∴ρ =
ne 2
∑ 1τ = ρ T + ρ i
Hall Effect
In a magnetic Field B the electron experiences
a force perpendicular to its velocity.
A current j causes a build up of charge at the
edges which generates an Electric field E
which balances the Lorentz force
( − e ) ( E + v d × B ) y = 0; E y = (vd ) x B z
( − e ) ( E + v d × B ) y = 0; E y = (vd ) x B z
j x = n ( − e) vd ⇒ RH = − 1
ne
Negative sign is sign of the charge on the electron
Wiedeman-Franz ratio
Electrical and Thermal conductivities of electrons are both
proportional to the relaxation time τ
Taking the ratio of the two should make this cancel so if we
define the Lorenz number as L = K/(σT) we have the
Wiedeman-Franz Law: L = K =
π 2 2
kB
σT 3e 2
Predicted value is absolute and the same for all metals.
Works well at high and low temps, - breaks down in ‘Debye’
region where energy and charge scattering are different
Failures:
• Heat capacities and Hall effect of many metals are wrong
• Hall effect can be positive
• Does not explain why mean free paths can be so long
• Does not explain why some materials are metals, some insulators
and some are semiconductors
V ( x) = ∑ G
VG exp (iGx )
Bragg scattering
θ
d Δk = 2|k|sinθ
2dsinθ = λ = 4π/λ sinθ = 2π/d
= 2 (k − G )
2
=2 ∂2 = 2k 2
H11 = ψ1 * − ψ1 = , H 22 =
2m ∂x 2 2m 2m
H12 = ψ 1 * V ( x) ψ 2 = VG