Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1060

Ofer Aluf

Microwave
RF Antennas
and Circuits
Nonlinearity Applications in Engineering
Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits
Ofer Aluf

Microwave RF Antennas
and Circuits
Nonlinearity Applications in Engineering

123
Ofer Aluf
Netanya
Israel

ISBN 978-3-319-45425-2 ISBN 978-3-319-45427-6 (eBook)


DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6
Library of Congress Control Number: 2016950418

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017


This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part
of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission
or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar
methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from
the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or
for any errors or omissions that may have been made.

Printed on acid-free paper

This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature


The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface

This book on microwave RF circuits: nonlinearity applications in engineering


covers and deals with two separate engineering and scientific areas and what
between. It gives advance analysis methods for Microwave RF Circuits which
represent many applications in engineering. Microwave RF Circuits come in many
topological structures and represent many specific implementations which stand the
target engineering features. Microwave RF Circuits include RFID antenna systems,
microwave elements, microwave semiconductor amplifiers, small-signal
(SS) amplifiers and matching networks, power amplifiers, oscillators, filters,
antennae systems, and high-power transistor circuit. The basic Microwave RF
Circuits can be characterized by some models and the associated equations. The
Microwave RF Circuits include RFID ICs and antennas, microstrip, circulators,
cylindrical RF network antennas, tunnel diode (TD), bipolar transistors, field-effect
transistors, IMPATT amplifiers, small-signal (SS) amplifiers, Bias-T circuits, PIN
diode, power amplifiers, LNAs, oscillators, resonators, filters, N-turn antennae, dual
spiral coils antennae, Helix antennas, linear dipole and slot array, and hybrid
translinear circuit. The Microwave RF Circuits analyze as linear and nonlinear
dynamical systems and their dynamics under parameter variations. This book is
aimed at newcomers to linear and nonlinear dynamics and chaos Microwave RF
Circuits. The presentation stresses analytical and numerical methods, concrete
examples, and geometric intuition. The Microwave RF Circuits analysis is devel-
oped systematically, starting with first-order differential equations and their bifur-
cation, followed by phase plane analysis, limit cycles and their bifurcations, chaos,
iterated maps, period doubling, renormalization, and strange attractors.
Additionally, the book is dealt with delayed Microwave RF Circuits which char-
acterized by overall variables delayed with time. Each variable has specific delay
parameter and can be inspected for dynamics. More realistic Microwave RF
Circuits models should include some of the past states of Microwave RF Circuits
and systems; that is, ideally, a real Microwave RF Circuits should be modeled by
differential equations with time delays. The use of delay differential equations
(DDEs) in the modeling of Microwave RF Circuits dynamics is currently very
active, largely due to progress achieved in the understanding of the dynamics of

v
vi Preface

several classes of delayed differential equations and Microwave RF Circuits and


systems. This book is designed for advanced undergraduate or graduate students in
electronics, RF and electronic engineering, physics, and mathematics who are
interested in Microwave RF Circuits dynamics and innovative analysis methods. It
is also addressed to electrical and RF engineers, physics experts and researchers in
physics, electronics, engineering and mathematics who use dynamical systems as
modeling tools in their studies. Therefore, only a moderate mathematical and
electronic semiconductor background in geometry, linear algebra, analysis, and
differential equations is required. Each chapter includes various Microwave RF
Circuits drawing and their equivalent analyses circuits. Microwave RF Circuits
fixed points and stability analysis done by using much estimation. Various bifur-
cations of Microwave RF Circuits are discussed.
In this book, we try to provide the reader with explicit procedures for application
of general Microwave RF Circuits mathematical representations to particular
research problems. Special attention is given to numerical implementation of the
developed techniques.
Let us briefly characterize the content of each chapter.
Chapter 1. RFID Antenna Systems Descriptions and Analysis. In this chapter,
RFID antenna systems are described and analyzed. RFID is a dedicated short-range
communication (DCRC) technology. RFID system consists of an antenna and a
transceiver, which read the radio frequency, and transfers the information to a
processing device (reader) and a transponder, or RFID tag. Active RFID tag system
includes energy source (battery), and it consumes energy. The active RFID tag
system is analyzed as an excitable linear bifurcation system. RFID tag-dimensional
parameters are optimized to get the best performances. Under delayed electro-
magnetic interferences, there are delays in some RFID tag coil variables and we
analyze it for stability optimization. There is a unique structure of RFID system,
semi-passive RFID tags with double-loop antennae arranged as a shifted gate. The
structure is optimized under delayed electromagnetic interferences. RFID tag
detector circuit is implemented by using schottky diode, and stability is analyzed for
parameter values variation. RFID system burst switch is a very important element,
and its behavior in time is inspected. The analysis fills the gap of analytical methods
for RFID systems analysis, concrete examples, and geometric examples. One of the
crucial RFID system optimization is in electromagnetic environmental which faced
RFID system variables delay in time. In some cases, RFID system can be repre-
sented as delayed differential equations, which depends on variable parameters and
delays. There are practical guidelines that combine graphical information with
analytical work to effectively study the local stability of RFID system models
involving delay-dependent parameters.
Chapter 2. Microwave Element Description and Stability Analysis. In this
chapter, microwave element stability is discussed. There are three types of
microwave circuits which include microwave elements. The first is a discrete cir-
cuit, packaged diodes/transistors mounted in coax and waveguide assemblies. The
second is Hybrid MIC (microwave integrated circuit), diodes/transistors and
microstrip fabricated separately and then assembled. The third is MMIC
Preface vii

(monolithic microwave integrated circuit), diodes, transistors, and microstrip


circuits, and other circuit elements, such as lumped capacitors and resistors, which
have parasitic effects influenced on overall system stability behavior. Microwave
transmission lines are delayed in time and are integral part of power limiter; the
stability is inspected for optimization. Reflection-type phase shifter (RTPS)
employs a circulator. The RTPS circuit includes microstrip transmission lines with
three-port active circulator and analyzes for stability optimization under time
delayed. Cylindrical RF network antennas for coupled plasma sources include
copper legs. They run as large-volume plasma sources and have stability switching
due to system’s copper leg parasitic effects. Tunnel diode (TD) is the p-n junction
device that exhibits negative resistance. Tunnel diode (TD) can be a microwave
oscillator. Transient is in the resonant cavity after turning the bias voltage ON. The
resonant circuit with NDR can oscillate. The Tunnel diode (TD) microwave
oscillator has parasitic effects in time and delay variables. The stability is optimized
when implementing tunnel diode (TD) in microwave oscillator.
Chapter 3. Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis. In this chapter,
microwave semiconductor amplifier circuit analysis is discussed. Microwave
semiconductor amplifiers are widely used, and stability analysis is needed.
Microwave semiconductors can be bipolar transistors which operate at microwave
frequencies, and microwave field-effect transistors (FETs) minimize the adverse
effects of transit time and internal capacitance and resistance, IMPATT
(impact-ionization avalanche transit time) amplifier which widely used at the high
end of the microwave band. Stability of these microwave amplifiers is affected by
internal parameter variation and circuit microstrip parasitic effects. IMPATT diodes
which are a form of high-power diode are used in high-frequency electronic and
microwave devices. FET-combined biasing and matching circuit has many stability
issues which must be taken for every RF design, and analysis is done for best
performances.
Chapter 4. Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network Stability
Analysis. In this chapter, small-signal (SS) amplifiers and matching network
structures are analyzed for best performances. There are some types of amplifiers.
Amplifiers types are zero-frequency amplifiers (DC amplifiers), low-frequency
amplifiers (audio amplifiers), and high-frequency amplifiers (RF amplifiers).
Amplifiers come in three basic flavors: common base (CB) amplifiers, common
collector (CC) amplifiers, and common emitter (CE) amplifiers. It depends whether
the base, collector, or emitter is common to both the input and output of the
amplifier. When an amplifier’s output impedance matches the load impedance,
maximum power is transferred to the load and all reflections are eliminated. When
an amplifier’s output impedance unmatched the load impedance, there are reflec-
tions and less than maximum power is transferred to the load. There are instability
behaviors in these three types of amplifiers caused by circuit microstrip delays in
time parasitic effects. We use RF matching network in our design. There are typical
amplifiers matching networks: L matching network, T matching network, and PI
matching network. In design of microwave matching network, device parasitic
effects of length on RF circuit matching and stability. Bias-T three-port network
viii Preface

also suffers from instability under delayed microstrip in time. A PIN diode is
suitable for many applications and operates under high level of injection. The PIN
diode suffers from instability under parameter variations.
Chapter 5. Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis. In this chapter,
power amplifiers (PAs) are analyzed for best performances, and stability was also
discussed. Large-signal or power amplifiers (PAs) are used in the output stages of
audio amplifier systems to derive a load speaker. There are different types
of amplifiers which classified according to their circuit configurations and method
of operation. The classification of amplifiers ranged from linear operation with very
low efficiency to nonlinear operation but with a much higher efficiency, while
others are a compromise between the two. There are two basic amplifier class
groups. The first are the classically controlled conduction angle amplifiers forming
the more common amplifier classes (A, B, AB, and C). The second set of amplifiers
are the newer so-called switching amplifier classes (D, E, F, G, S, T). The most
commonly structured amplifier classes are those that are the most common type of
amplifier class mainly due to their simple design. We analyze the stability of these
amplifiers by inspecting the equivalent circuit differential equations. BJT transistor
is replaced by large-signal model in our analysis. The BJT model is known as the
Gummel–Poon model. The Ebers–Moll BJT model is a good large signal. We use
nonlinear dynamic in our analysis for amplifiers that feed by inputs/outputs exceed
certain limits. LNAs are used in many microwave and RF applications. We analyze
the stability of wideband low-noise amplifier (LNA) with negative feedback under
circuit’s parameter variation.
Chapter 6. Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis. In this
chapter, our oscillator systems are discussed and their stability behavior is analyzed.
Oscillators can be classified into two types: relaxation and harmonic oscillators.
A microwave oscillator is an active device to generate power and a resonator to
control the frequency of the microwave signal. Important issues in oscillators are
frequency stability, frequency tuning, and phase noise. A phase-shift oscillator is a
linear electronic oscillator circuit that produces a sine wave output. The feedback
network “shifts” the phase of the amplifier output by 180° at the oscillation fre-
quency to give positive feedback, total phase shift of 360°. Phase-shift resonator
circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT small-signal (SS) equivalent
circuit model. Closed-loop functioning oscillator can be viewed as feedback sys-
tem. The oscillation is sustained by feeding back a fraction of the output signal,
using an amplifier to gain the signal, and then injecting the energy back into the
tank. Closed-loop functioning oscillator stability is inspected and analyze. There are
types of transistor oscillators which use feedback and lumped inductance and
capacitance resonators. There are three types of transistor LC oscillators, Colpitts,
Hartley, and Clapp. In the Hartley oscillator, the feedback is supplied by the
inductive divider formed by two inductors. We apply the stability criterion of
Liapunov to our system. Colpitts oscillator is the same as Hertley oscillator and
instead of using a tapped inductance, Colpitts oscillator uses a tapped capacitance.
Colpitts oscillator circuit stability analysis is done by criterion of Liapunov.
Preface ix

Chapter 7. Filter Systems Stability Analysis. In this chapter, filter systems in


many circuits are inspected for dynamical behavior and stability analysis. The target
of analog and RF filtering is to modify the magnitude and phase of signal frequency
components. Many analog or radio frequency (RF) circuits perform filtering on the
signals passing through them. The analog and RF filter types are defined on the
criteria how they modify the magnitude and/or phase of sinusoidal frequency
components. Microwave and RF filters pass a range of frequencies and reject other
frequencies. A diplexer is a passive device that implements frequency-domain
multiplexing. Two ports are multiplexed onto a third port. A diplexer multiplexes
two ports onto one port, but more than two parts may be multiplexed. We analyze
BPF diplexer circuit stability by using geometric stability switch criteria in delay
differential systems. A diplexer filters to pass two bands to separate ports, and
stability analysis under parameter variation. The standard local stability analysis
about any one of the equilibrium points of dual-band diplexer filter circuit is done.
We use crystal in place of LC filter for low-frequency applications. There are lattice
crystal filter, half lattice, and cascaded half lattice filters. The standard local stability
analysis about any one of the equilibrium point of lattice crystal filter circuit is
done. A tunable BPF employing varactor diodes is ideal for many diverse wireless
applications. There are two types of tunable BPF employing varactor diodes: top
inductively coupled variable BPF and capacitively coupled variable band-pass
filter. BPF (varactor diodes) circuit involving N variables and stability behavior is
inspected.
Chapter 8. Antenna System Stability Analysis. In this chapter, we discussed
various antenna systems and behaviors for different conditions for best perfor-
mances. An antenna is a conductor or group of conductors used for radiating
electromagnetic energy into space or collecting electromagnetic energy from space.
There are many types of antennas and we discussed those antennas that operate at
microwave frequencies. Microwave refer to radio waves with wavelength ranging
from as long as one meter to as short as one millimeter with frequencies between
300 MHz and 300 GHz. Another antenna area is for RFID applications.
A complete RFID system includes RFID reader and transponder units. N-turn
multilayer circular-coil antennas can be integrated with RFID IC for complete RFID
tags. We investigate the system stability optimization under delayed electromag-
netic interference and parasitic effects. The system is constructed from two
antennas: each one N-turn multilayer circular antenna. The standard local stability
analysis about any one of the equilibrium points (fixed points) of N-turn multilayer
circular-coil antenna RFID system is done. We analyze circuit stability where there
is a delay in the first and second RFIDs’ N-turn multilayer-coil antenna voltages
and antenna voltage derivatives. A double-rectangular spiral antenna is constructed
from two antennas, each antenna is a rectangular spiral antenna. Antennas are
connected in series with microstrip line and to the RFID IC. The standard local
stability analysis about any one of the equilibrium points of RFID tags with double
rectangular spiral antenna system is done. A system of single-turn square planar
straight thin-film inductor antenna (four segments) is constructed from four straight
thin-film inductors which are connected in a single-turn square structure. There are
x Preface

delays in time for the microstrip line parasitic effects, and stability switching is
inspected for different values of delay variables. A helical antenna is an antenna
consisting of a conducting wire wound in the form of a helix. The helical antennas
are mounted over a ground plane. Helical antennas can operate in one of two
principal modes: normal mode or axial mode. Helix antenna system stability is
inspected under parameter variation.
Chapter 9. Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation Behavior,
Investigation, Comparison and Conclusion. In this chapter, we summarized the
main topics regarding microwave and RF antennas and systems, inspect behavior,
dynamics, stability, comparison, and conclusion. Microwave RF antennas are an
integral part of every RF or microwave system. An antenna is an electrical device
which converts electric power into radio waves, and vice versa. In many wireless
applications, antennas are required by radio receiver or transmitter to couple its
electrical connection to the electromagnetic field. When we inspect system stability
which includes radio waves, we inspect electromagnetic waves which carry signals
through the space (or air) at the speed of light with almost no transmission loss.
There are mainly two categories of antennas. The first is omnidirectional antenna
which receives and/or radiates in all directions. The second is directional antenna
which radiates in a particular direction or pattern. Antennas are characterized by a
number of parameters, radiation pattern, and the resulting gain. Antenna’s gain is
dependent on its power in the horizontal directions, and antenna’s power gain takes
into account the antenna’s efficiency (figure of merit). The physical size of an
antenna is a practical issue, particularly at lower frequencies. Stability analysis
includes a complete RF system with antennas and matching networks.

Netanya, Israel Ofer Aluf


Contents

1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1


1.1 Active RFID TAGs System Analysis of Energy Consumption
as Excitable Linear Bifurcation System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 RFID TAG’s Dimensional Parameters Optimization
as Excitable Linear Bifurcation Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability Optimization Under
Delayed Electromagnetic Interferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas
Arranged as a Shifted Gate System for Stability
Optimization Under Delayed Electromagnetic Interferences . . . . . . 44
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis Under Delayed
Schottky Diode’s Internal Elements in Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under
Delayed Internal Diode Circuitry Parasitic Effects in Time . . . . . . . 104
Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis . . . . . . .... 155
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power
Limiters Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 156
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase
Shifter (RTPS) Circuit Transmission Lines Delayed
in Time System Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 171
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma
Sources Copper Legs Delayed in Time System Stability
Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 196
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System
Cavity Parasitic Elements Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 221
Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 267

xi
xii Contents

3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 279


3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies Description
and Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 279
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave Frequencies
Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 299
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave Frequencies
Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 318
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 333
3.5 Multistage IMPATT Amplifier System Microstrip Delayed
in Time Stability Switching Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 373
3.6 FET Combined Biasing and Matching Circuit Stability
Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 382
Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 392
4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network
Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 405
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network . . . . . . . .... 406
4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s Matching Network
and Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 422
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability
Analysis Under Microstrip Parasitic Parameters Variation . . . .... 435
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching Under
Delayed Micro Strip in Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 460
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation . . . .... 489
Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 501
5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 513
5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power Amplifiers Stability Analysis
Under Parameters Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 514
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance
Circuit Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation . . . . . . .... 528
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier Gummel-Poon Model
Analysis Under Parameters Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 559
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative
Feedback Circuit Stability Analysis Under Circuit’s
Parameters Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 573
Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 587
6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601
6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift from Its Input
to Output Stability Analysis Under Delayed Variables
in Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 602
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis
Under Parameters Variations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 617
Contents xiii

6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 630


6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 644
Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 661
7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 673
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis . . . . . .... 674
7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under
Parameters Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 697
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . .... 711
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability
Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 745
Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 768
8 Antennas System Stability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 783
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver
System Stability Optimization Under Delayed
Electromagnetic Interferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 785
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability
Optimization Under Delayed Electromagnetic Interferences
and Parasitic Effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 818
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors
Antenna System Stability Optimization Under Microstrip
Delayed in Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 849
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under
Parameters Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 873
Exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 885
9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation
Behavior, Investigation, Comparison and Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . 903
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design
and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics
and Design Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 941
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET
Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 993
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1035
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1041
Introduction

Microwave RF antenna products are currently in a widely use in all aspects of


engineering designs. Microwave RF antenna products are transmission lines,
coaxial cables, waveguide, strip line and microstrip, microwave semiconductors
(PIN diode, RF bipolar transistor, RF FET, varactor, schottky diode, LDMOS,
DMOS, GaN devices, etc.), RF combiner and couplers, isolators and circulator,
filters, attenuators, switches, phase shifter, detectors, amplifiers, oscillators, tubes,
microwave antennas (dipole, slot, horn, spiral, helix, arrays, parabolic dish, phased
arrays), low-power communication antennas (ZigBee, RFID/NFC, Bluetooth,
Wi-Fi, GPS, etc.). The basic structure of Microwave RF antenna product contains
de/multiplexed amplifiers, filters, mixers, etc. The Microwave RF antenna system
ports are RF inputs, RF outputs, oscillators, and input control lines). The below
figure demonstrates the basic structure of Microwave RF antenna system:

Control
lines

RF inputs RF outputs
( VjiIN , IjiIN ) ( VjiOUT , IjiOUT )
Microwave
system

Oscillators

The input control lines can be connected to additional embedded system by


many kinds of interfaces (RS232, RS485, UART, SPI, SDIO, etc.). RF inputs can
be connected to various antennas and other RF systems. RF outputs can be

xv
xvi Introduction

connected to additional RF systems and devices. The overall Microwave RF


antenna system equation can be represented as below:

i¼1 Y
X j¼1
d n VjiIN d n IjiIN
fVjiOUT ; IjiOUT g ¼ f ðVji; IjiÞ ¼ kji ðVjiIN ; IjiIN ; ; Þ
n i
dtn dtn

The Microwave RF systems can be represented as RF input circuit and RF


output circuit. The RF system function contains high-degree derivatives of input
and output voltages.
The primary purpose of a Microwave and RF system application functionality on
input variables. Many topological Microwave/RF system schematics give a variety
of nonlinear behaviors which can be implemented in many engineering areas. Each
Microwave/RF system can be represented by a set of differential equations which
depend on Microwave/RF system’s variable parameters. The investigation of
Microwave and RF system’s differential equation bifurcation theory, the study of
possible changes in the structure of the orbits of a differential equation depending
on variable parameters. The book illustrates certain observations and analyzes local
bifurcations of an appropriate arbitrary scalar differential equation. Since the
implicit function theorem is the main ingredient used in these generalizations,
include a precise statement of this theorem. Additional analyze the bifurcations of a
Microwave/RF system’s differential equation of the circle. The bifurcation behavior
of specific differential equations can be encapsulated in certain pictures called
bifurcation diagrams. All of that for optimization of Microwave/RF system’s
parameter optimization—to get the best performance. Dynamics (Chaos, fractals)
change with systems that evolute in time. There are two types of dynamical sys-
tems: differential equations and iterated map (difference equations). Differential
equation has described the evolution of systems in continuous time. Iterated map is
arising in problems where the time is discrete. Differential equations can be divided
into two main groups: ordinary differential equations and partial differential equa-
tions. The differential equation system can be represented as below:
dX1
dt ¼ f1 ðx1 ; . . .. . .; xn Þ
:
:
dXn
dt ¼ fn ðx1 ; . . .. . .; xn Þ
:
Xi ¼ dX dt
i

Some of the Microwave/RF systems can be represented as an equation in


dimension “one.” Basic notions of Microwave/RF systems, circuit stability, and
bifurcations of vector fields are easily explained for scalar autonomous equations
dimension one—because their flows are determined from the equilibrium points.
Numerical solutions of such equations lead to scalar maps and show some of the
“anomalies” albeit profound and exciting that may arise when numerical approxi-
mation is a poor period doubling bifurcation, chaos, etc.
Introduction xvii

Microwave/RF systems equations can be turned to the dynamics and bifurca-


tions of periodic solutions of no autonomous equations with periodic coefficients’
dimension one and one half, where scalar maps reappear naturally as Poincare
maps. Microwave/RF system investigates the dynamics of planar autonomous
equations—dimension two—where, in addition to equilibria, new dynamical
behavior, such as periodic and homoclinic orbits, appears. Microwave/RF system
schematic stability of an equilibrium point, subtle topological aspects of linear
systems as well as the standard theory of Liapunov functions. Center manifolds and
the method of Liapunov–Schmidt to make a reduction to a scalar autonomous
equation. Periodic orbit—Poincare—Andronov—Hopf bifurcation—and its analy-
sis can be reduced to that of a nonautonomous periodic equation.
Additionally, we discussed Microwave RF antenna systems with delay elements
(parasitic effects, circuit component delays, microstrip delays, etc.). Our
Microwave RF antenna system delay differential and delay different model can be
analytically used with delay differential equations in dynamically. The need of the
incorporation of a time delay is often of the existence of any stage structure. It is
often difficult to analytically study models with delay-dependent parameters, even if
only a single discrete delay is present. There are practical guidelines that combine
graphical information with analytical work to effectively study the local stability of
models involving delay-dependent parameters. The stability of a given steady state
is simply determined by the graphs of some function of s1 ; . . .; sn ; n 2 N which can
be expressed explicitly and thus can be easily depicted by MATLAB and other
popular software. We need only look at one such function and locate the zero. This
function often has only two zeros, providing thresholds for stability switches. As
time delay increases, stability changes from stable to unstable to stable. We
emphasize the local stability aspects of some models with delay-dependent
parameters. Additionally, there is a general geometric criterion that, theoretically
speaking, can be applied to models with many delays, or even distributed delays.
The simplest case of a first-order characteristic equation provides more
user-friendly geometric and analytic criteria for stability switches. The analytical
criteria provided for the first- and second-order cases can be used to obtain some
insightful analytical statements and can be helpful for conducting simulations.
Chapter 1
RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions
and Analysis

RFID is short for radio frequency identification; RFID is a dedicated short range
communication (DSRC) technology. The term RFID is used to describe various
technologies that use radio waves to automatically identify people or objects.
With RFID, the electromagnetic or electrostatic coupling in the RF (radio fre-
quency) portion of the electromagnetic spectrum is used to transmit signals. RFID
system consists of an antenna and a transceiver, which read the radio frequency and
transfers the information to a processing device (reader) and a transponder, or RF
tag, which contains the RF circuitry and information to be transmitted. The antenna
provides the means for the integrated circuit to transmit its information to the reader
that converts the radio waves reflected back from the RFID tag into digital infor-
mation that can then be passed on to computers that can analyze the data. In RFID
systems, the tags that hold the data are broken down into two different types.
Passive tags use the radio frequency from the reader to transmit their signal and
Active tags. Passive tags use the radio frequency from the reader to transmit their
signal. Passive tags will generally have their data permanently burned into the tag
when it is made, although some can be rewritten. Active tags are much more
sophisticated and have an on-board battery for power to transmit their data signal
over a greater distance and power random access memory (RAM) giving them the
ability to store up to 32,000 bytes of data. RFID systems can use a variety of
frequencies to communicate, but because radio waves work and act differently at
different frequencies, a frequency for a specific RFID system is often dependent on
its application. An RFID system is always made up of two components:
transponder, which is located on the object to be identified, detector or reader,
which, depending upon design and the technology used, may be a read or write/read
device. There is a need to analyzing RFID systems. The analysis is based on
nonlinear dynamics and chaos models and shows comprehensive benefits and
results. The dynamics of RFID systems provides several ways to use them in a
variety of applications covering wide areas. The analysis fills the gap of analytical
methods for RFID systems analysis, concrete examples, and geometric examples.
The RFID systems analysis is developed systematically, starting with basic passive
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 1
O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_1
2 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

and active RFID systems, differential equations and their bifurcations, followed by
fixed point analysis, limit cycles and their bifurcations. One of the crucial RFID
system optimization is in electromagnetic environmental which faced RFID system
variable delay in time. In some cases RFID system can represent as a delayed
differential equations which, depending on variable parameters and delays. There
are practical guidelines that combine graphical information with analytical work to
effectively study the local stability of models involving delay dependent parame-
ters. The stability of a given steady state is determined by the graphs of some
function [2–4, 85].

1.1 Active RFID TAGs System Analysis of Energy


Consumption as Excitable Linear Bifurcation System

Active RFID Tags have a built in power supply, such as a battery, as well as
electronics that perform specialized tasks. By contrast, passive RFID TAGs do not
have a power supply and must rely on the power emitted by an RFID Reader to
transmit data. Thus, if a reader is not present, the passive TAGs can’t communicate
a data. Active TAGs can communicate in the absence of a reader. Active RFID
Tags system energy consumption can be a function of many variables: q(m), u(m), z
(m), t(m), tms(m), when m is the number of TAG IDs which are uniformly dis-
tributed in the interval [0,1). It is very important to emphasize that basic
Active RFID TAG, equivalent circuit is Capacitor (Cic), Resistor (Ric), L (RFID’s
Coil inductance as a function of overall Coil’s parameters) all in parallel and
Voltage generator Vs(t) with serial parasitic resistance. The Voltage generator and
serial parasitic resistance are in parallel to all other Active RFID TAG’s elements
(Cic, Ric, and L (Coil inductance)). The Active RFID TAG equivalent circuit can
be represented as a differential equation which depending on variable parameters.
The investigation of Active RFID’s differential equation based on bifurcation
theory, the study of possible changes in the structure of the orbits of a differential
equation depending on variable parameters. We first illustrate certain observations
and analyze local bifurcations of an appropriate arbitrary scalar differential equa-
tion. Finally, investigate Active RFID TAGs system energy for the best perfor-
mance using an excitable bifurcation diagram. Active RFID Tags have a built in
power supply, such as a battery. The major advantages of an active RFID Tags are:
It can be read at distances of one hundred feet or more, greatly improving the utility
of the device. It may have other sensors that can use electricity for power. The
disadvantages of an active RFID Tags are: The TAG cannot function without
battery power, which limits the lifetime of the TAG. The TAG is typically more
expensive. The TAG is physically larger, which may limit applications. The long
term maintenance costs for an active RFID tag can be greater than those of a passive
Tag if the batteries are replaced. Battery outages in an active TAGs can result in
expensive misreads. Active RFID TAGs may have all or some of the following
1.1 Active RFID TAGs System Analysis of Energy Consumption … 3

features: Longest communication range of any TAG, the capability to perform an


independent monitoring and control, the capability of initiating communications,
the capabilities of performing diagnostics, and the highest data bandwidth. The
active RFID TAGs may even be equipped with autonomous networking; the TAGs
autonomously determine the best communication path. Mainly active RFID TAGs
have a built in power supply, such as battery, as well as electronics that perform
specialized tasks. By contrast, passive RFID TAGs do not have a power supply and
must rely on the power emitted by an RFID Reader to transmit data. There is an
arbitration while reading TAGs (TAGs anti-collision problem). First, identify and
then read data stored on RFID Tags [85] (Fig. 1.1).
It is very important to read TAG IDs of all. The Anti-collision protocol based on
two methods: ALOHA and its variants and Binary tree search. ALOHA protocol,
reducing collisions by separating TAG responds by time (probabilistic and simple).
TAG ID may not read for a very long time. The Binary tree search protocol is
deterministic in nature. Read all TAGs by successively querying nodes at different
levels of the tree with TAG IDs distributed on the tree based on their prefix.
Guarantee that all TAGs IDs will be read within a certain time frame. The binary
tree search procedure, however, uses up a lot of reader queries and TAG responses
by relying on colliding responses of TAGs to determine which sub tree to query
next. Higher energy consumption in readers and tags (If they are active TAGs).
TAGs can’t be assumed to be able to communicate with each other directly. TAGs
may not be able of storing states of the arbitration process in their memory. There
are three anti-collision protocols: All’s include and combine the ideas of a binary
tree search protocol with frame slotted ALOHA, deterministic schemes, and energy
aware. The first anti-collision protocol is a Multi Slotted (MS) scheme, multiple
slots per query to reduce the chances of collision among the TAG responses. The
second anti-collision protocol is a Multi Slotted with Selective sleep (MSS) scheme;
using sleep commands to put resolved TAGs to sleep during the arbitration process.
Both MS and MSS have a probabilistic flavor, TAGs choose a reply slot in a query
frame randomly. The third anti-collision protocol is a Multi Slotted with Assigned
slots (MAS), assigning tags in each sub tree of the search tree to a specific slot of
the query frame. It’s a deterministic protocol, including the replay behavior of tags.
All three protocols can adjust the frame size used per query. Maximize energy
savings at the reader by reducing collisions among TAG responses. The frame size
is also chosen based on a specified average time constraint within which all TAGs
IDs must be read. The binary search protocols are Binary Tree (BT) and Query Tree

Fig. 1.1 Reader TAG


interrogation diagram TAG 0

Reader Interrogation
Unit signal (query)

TAG n
4 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

(QT). Both work by splitting TAG IDs using queries from the reader until all tags
are read. Binary Tree (BT) relies on TAGs remembering the results of previous
inquiries by the readers. TAGs susceptible to their power supply. Query Tree
(QT) protocol, is a deterministic TAG anti-collision protocol, which is memory loss
with TAGs requiring no additional memory except that required to store their ID
(Fig. 1.2).
The approach to energy aware anti-collision protocols for RFID systems is to
combine the deterministic nature of binary search algorithms along with the sim-
plicity of frame slotted ALOHA to reduce the number of TAG response collisions.
The QT protocol relies on colliding responses to queries that are sent to internal
nodes of a tree to determine the location of TAG ID. Allow tags to transmit
responses within a slotted time frame and thus, try to avoid collisions with
responses from other tags. The energy consumption at the reader is a function of the
number of queries it sends, and number of slots spent in the receive mode. Energy
consumption at an active TAG is a function of the number of queries received by
the TAG and the number of responses it sends back. Neglect the energy spent in
modes other than transmit and receive for simplicity. Assumption: Time slot in
which a reader query or message is sent is equal to the duration as that of a TAG
response. The energy model of the reader is based upon a half-duplex operation.
Reader transmits energy, and its query for a specific period and then wait in
receiving mode with no more energy transmission until the end of the frame. The
flow chart for reader query and TAGs: (Fig. 1.3).
Response mechanism is as below: (Fig. 1.4).
Pulse based half duplex operation is termed as sequential (SEQ) operational
(Fig. 1.5).

Query
(prefix)

TAGn+1 (no
Reader Perfix)
TAG1
(Perfix)
TAG2
(Perfix)
Responds (Perfix
+ TAG ID)

TAGn
(Perfix) TAGn+k (no
Perfix)

Fig. 1.2 Reader TAGs system query and responds


1.1 Active RFID TAGs System Analysis of Energy Consumption … 5

Reader Wait time


query (Receive mode)
Energy No Energy
consumption consumption
One Frame
Start of End of
Frame Frame

Fig. 1.3 One frame reader query and wait time

Start

n=1

Reader query
(specific prefix)

TAG n, TAG n+1


….. Respond

No. of TAGs respond YES


to a specific prefix
query (reader) > 1

NO
Reader extends
TAG is resolved and the prefix by
uniquely identified ‘0’ or ‘1’ bit
and continues
the query with
n=n+1 this longer

Fig. 1.4 Flow chart for reader query and TAGs


6 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

One slot for a query F slots reader wait


from reader for response

Fig. 1.5 One slot for a query and F slots reader wait for a response

The power required by the reader to transmit The power required by the reader to receive
PRtx PRrx

The power required by an active TAG to The power required by an active TAG to
transmit receive
PTtx PTrx

Reader energy consumption: q(m)  (PRtx + PRrx  F) when q(m) is the number
of queries for reading m TAGs. The energy consumption of all active TAGs:
q(m)  PTrx + u(m)  PTtx when q(m) is the number of reader queries, u(m) is the
number of TAG responses. For MSS scheme (include sleep command) the reader
energy consumption is q(m)  (PRtx + PRrx  F) + z(m)  PRtx. The total energy
consumption for all active TAGs is q(m)  PTrx + u(m)  PTtx + z(m)  PTrx,
when z(m) is the number of sleep commands issued by the reader. The average
analysis of energy consumption:


qðmÞaverage number of reader queires:

uðmÞaverage number of TAG responses:
zðmÞaverage number of sleep commands
issued by the reader ðonly for MSS SchemeÞ
tðmÞaverage number of time slots required to read all TAGs:
tMS ðmÞaverage number of time slots required to read m TAGs

m TAG IDs are uniformly distributed in the interval [0.1]. We get the expression for
one active RFID TAG total energy consumption U(m) = u(m):

1
TAG Power ¼  ½qðmÞ  PTrx þ UðmÞ  PTtx þ ZðmÞ  PTrx
m

Active RFID TAG can represent as a parallel Equivalent Circuit of Capacitor


and Resistor in parallel with Supply voltage source (internal resistance) (Fig. 1.6).
The Active RFID TAG Antenna can be represented as Parallel inductor to the
basic Active RFID Equivalent Circuit. The simplified complete equivalent circuit of
the label is as below: (Fig. 1.7)
1.1 Active RFID TAGs System Analysis of Energy Consumption … 7

Active RFID TAG


LA

LB Voltage
source

Antenna

Fig. 1.6 Active RFID TAG system

V(t)

Rs Active RFID Antenna


C1 L1
R1
Vs(t)

Active RFID's Equivalent circuit

Fig. 1.7 Active RFID TAG’s equivalent circuit

Zt1
dI 1
VL1 ¼ L1  ) I L1 ¼  VL1  dt;
dt L1
0

dVc1 X
4
IC1 ¼ C1  ; Ij ¼ 0
dt j¼1

V ¼ Vc1 ¼ VL1 ¼ VR1


Zt1
V dV 1 V  VsðtÞ
þ C1  þ  V  dt þ ¼0
R1 dt L1 Rs
0

1 dV d2V 1 dV 1 dVsðtÞdt !eð0\e1Þ


f  þ C1  2 þ Vþ  g  ! 0
R1 dt dt L1 dt Rs
:: 1 1 : 1 1
e  1 ) V C1 þ ð þ Þ  V þ  V ¼  V_ S ðtÞ
R1 Rs L1 Rs
1 dV d2 V 1 dV dVsðtÞ 1
 þ C1  2 þ V þ½   ¼0
R1 dt dt L1 dt dt Rs
8 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

dV1 dV
V2 ¼ ¼ ; V1 ¼ V
dt dt
dV1 dV2 1 1 1 1 dVsðtÞ
¼ V2 ; ¼ ½ þ   V2   V1 þ 
dt dt C1  R1 Rs  C1 C L Rs  C1 dt
! !  1 1 !
dV1
0 1 V1 0
dt
¼  þ dVsðtÞ
dV2  C11L1 ½C11R1 þ RsC
1
 V2 RsC1  dt
1
dt
hl i
1

Lcalc ¼ 0  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp


p

L1 = Lcalc !
2  Aavg  Bavg
X1 ¼ Aavg  ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d  ðAavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
!
2  Aavg  Bavg
X2 ¼ Bavg  ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d  ðBavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
 ffi
X3 ¼ 2  Aavg þ Bavg  Aavg2 þ Bavg2 ; X4 ¼ ðAavg þ BavgÞ=4

The RFID’s coil calculation inductance expression is the definition of limits,


Estimations: Track thickness t, Al and Cu coils (t > 30 lm). The printed coils as
high as possible. Estimation of turn exponent p is needed for inductance calculation.

Coil manufacturing technology P


Wired 1.8–1.9
Etched 1.75–1.85
Printed 1.7–1.8

Active RFID can be considered as a Van der Pol’s system. Van der Pol’s
equation provides an example of an oscillator with nonlinear damping, energy
being dissipated at large amplitudes and generated at low amplitudes. Such systems
typically possess limit cycles, sustained oscillations around a state at which energy
generation and dissipation balance. The basic Van der Pol’s equation can be written
:: :
in the form: X þ a  /ðxÞ  X þ X ¼ b  qðtÞ.
:: 1 1 : 1 1
e  1 ) V C1 þ ð þ ÞV þ  V ¼  V_ S ðtÞ
R1 Rs L1 Rs
:: 1 1 1 : 1 1
e1)V þ ð þ ÞV þ V ¼  V_ S ðtÞ
C1 R1 Rs L1  C1 Rs  C1
1 1 1 1 1
X ! V; a  /ðxÞ !  ð þ Þ; ! 1;  V_ S ðtÞ ! b  qðtÞ
C1 R1 Rs L1  C1 Rs  C1
1.1 Active RFID TAGs System Analysis of Energy Consumption … 9

Let’s define:

:: 1 1 : 1 1
fs ðtÞ ¼ V_ S ðt Þ ) e  1 ) V C1 þ ð þ ÞV þ  V ¼  fs ðtÞ
R1 Rs L1 Rs

“f” is a “T” periodic function of the independent variable t, and k ¼ Rs 1

The term k  fs ðtÞ ¼ Rs  V_ S ðtÞ is called the forcing function k ! 0 ) Rs


1 1
!0)
Rs ! 1 there is no forcing and the system act as Van Der Pol Oscillator. It is
necessary to examine the trajectories (V1, V2, and t) of the non-autonomous Active
RFID system in R2 xR rather than the orbits in R2 . Equivalently, we may consider
the orbits of the Active RFID TAGs three dimensional autonomous systems.
dV1
¼ V2
dt
dV2 1 1 1 1
¼ ½ þ   V2   V1 þ  fs ðtÞ 8 fs ðtÞ ¼ V_ S ðtÞ
dt C1  R1 Rs  C1 C1  L1 Rs  C1
dV3
¼ 1 8 ðV3 ðtÞ ¼ tÞ
dt

First examine the case of k ¼ 0 ) Rs  C1 ! 1; C1 ¼ const; then Rs ! 1


The limit cycle, the isolated periodic orbit, of the unforced oscillator of Van Der
Pol becomes a cylinder; that is, topologically it is a homomorphism to S1  R. The
cylinder is an invariant manifold in the sense that any solution starting on the
cylinder remains on it for all positive time. This invariant cylinder attracts all nearby
solutions. For k ¼ 0, k ! 0 Rs ! 1 the Active RFID TAG invariant cylinder is
filled with a family of periodic solutions. The cylinder under the projection R2 
R ! R2 simply becomes the limit cycle. Actually active RFID TAGs act as peri-
odic forcing with small amplitude, that jkj small. In this case, there is still a cylinder
in R2  R close to the invariant cylinder of the unforced oscillator. This new
cylinder is an invariant manifold of solutions of the forced equation and attracts all
nearby solutions. The flow on the invariant cylinder of the forced equation can be
quite different from the one of the unforced oscillators. In Active RFID TAG
concern to the Van Der Pol’s equation, we get the equation:
:: :
X þ a  /ðxÞ  X þ X ¼ k  fs ðtÞ
:: 1 1 1 : 1 1
e  1 ) V þð þ Þ V þ V ¼  fs ðtÞ
R1 Rs C1 L1  C1 Rs  C1
:: 1 1 1 : 1 1
e  1 ) V þð þ Þ V þ V ¼  V_ S ðtÞ
R1 Rs C1 L1  C1 Rs  C1
1 1 1 1
then /ðxÞ ¼ 1; a ¼ ½ð þ Þ  ; ! 1ðL1  C1  1Þ
R1 Rs C1 L1  C1
/ðxÞ ¼ 1 [ 0 8 jtj [ 1 sec; fs ðt) is T periodic and a; b are non
1 1 1
negative parameters: a ¼ ð þ Þ  C1 ; b ¼
R1 Rs Rs  C1
10 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Unforced investigation: k ¼ 0 ) Rs 1
! 0 ) Rs ! 1 then we return to
Passive RFID TAG since the battery has a very high serial resistance—discon-
nected status. Active RFID equivalent circuit total TAG power is a summation of all
power elements.

X
N X
N
1
Ptotal ¼ pi ¼ TAG Power, pi ¼  ½qðmÞ  PTrx þ UðmÞ  PTtx þ ZðmÞ  PTrx 
i¼1 i¼1
m
X
N Zt Zt
0 0
pi ¼ pRs þ pC1 þ pR1 þ pL1 ; energy ) Wðt0 ; tÞ , pðt Þdt ¼ vðt0 Þ  iðt0 Þdt0
i¼1
t0 t0

dWðt0 ; tÞ d X N
1
PðtÞtotal ¼ ¼ ½ wi ; energy ) winductor ¼  L  I 2
dt dt i¼1 2
Q2
energy ) wcapacitor ¼ ; Presistor ¼ I 2 R; PR1 ¼ IR21 R1 ; PRs ¼ IRs
2
Rs
2C
1 d :
energy ) wL1 ¼  L1  IL21 ) PL1 ¼ wL1 ¼ L  IL1  IL1
2 dt
:
Q2 d Q C  QC 1
energy ) wC1 ¼ C1 ) PC1 ¼ wC1 ¼ 1
2  C1 dt C1

C1  VC21 d :
energy ) wC1 ¼ ) PC1 ¼ wC1 ¼ C1  VC1  VC1
2 dt
Zt :
VL1 X p QC 1  QC 1
N
1 : :
IL 1 ¼  VL1 dt ) IL1 ¼ ; i ¼ IR1 R1 þ IRs Rs þ L  IL1  IL1 þ
2 2
L1 L1 i¼1 C1
0
X
N 2
½V  VsðtÞ2 : :
pi ¼ V þ þ L  IL1  IL1 þ C1  VC1  VC1
i¼1
R1 Rs
X Zt
N
1 1 2  V  VsðtÞ ½VsðtÞ2 V :
pi ¼ V ½ þ  
2
þ þ  Vdt þ C1 V  V
i¼1
R1 Rs Rs Rs L1
0
1 1 1
 ½qðmÞ  PTrx þ UðmÞ  PTtx þ ZðmÞ  PTrx  ¼ V 2 ½ þ 
m R1 Rs
2 Zt
2  V  VsðtÞ ½Vs ðtÞ V :
 þ þ  Vdt þ C1 V  V
Rs Rs L1
0
dV1 dV2 1 1 1 1
¼ V2 ; ¼ ½ þ   V2   V1 þ  V_ S ðtÞ
dt dt C1  R1 Rs  C1 C1  L1 Rs  C1

Now we consider linear system: dV dt ¼ f ðV1 ; V2 Þ; dt ¼ gðV1 ; V2 Þ


1 dV2

And suppose that ðV1 ; V2 Þ is a fixed point: f ðV1 ; V2 Þ ¼ 0; gðV1 ; V2 Þ ¼ 0


Let U1 ¼ V1  V1 ; U2 ¼ V2  V2 Denote the components of a small disturbance
from the fixed point. To see whether the disturbance grows or decays, we need to
1.1 Active RFID TAGs System Analysis of Energy Consumption … 11

derive differential equations of U1 and U2. Let’s do the U1 equation first: dU


dt ¼ dt
1 dV1

Since V1 being constant.

dU1 dV1
¼ ¼ f ðU1 þ V1 ; U2 þ V2 Þ ¼ f ðV1 ; V2 Þ
dt dt
@f @f
þ U1  þ U2  þ OðU12 ; U22 ; U1  U2 Þ
@V1 @V2
@f @f
(Taylor series expansion). To simplify the notation, we have written @V 1
and @V2

these partial derivatives are to be evaluated at the fixed point ðV1 ; V2 Þ; thus they are
numbers, not functions. Also the shorthand notation OðU12 ; U22 ; U1  U2 Þ denotes
quadratic termss in U1 and U2. Since U1 and U2 are small, these quadratic terms are
extremely small. Similarly, we find
@g @g
dt ¼ U1  @V1 þ U2  @V2 þ OðU1 ; U2 ; U1  U2 Þ, Hence the disturbance (U1, U2)
dU2 2 2
0 dU 1
1 ! !
@f @f
B dt C @V1 @V2 U1
evolves according to @ A ¼ @g @g  þ Quadratic terms.
dU2 @V1 @V2 U2
dt !
@f @f
@V1 @V2
The Matrix A ¼ @g @g is called the Jacobian matrix at the fixed
@V1 @V2 ðV1 ;V2 Þ
point ðV1 ; V2 Þ and the Quadratic terms are tiny, it’s tempting to neglect them
altogether. If we do that, we obtain the linearized system.
0 dU 1
1 ! !
@f @f
B dt C @V1 @V2 U1
@ A¼ @g @g 
dU2 @V1 @V2 U2
dt

Who’s dynamic can be analyzed by the general methods.

1 1 1 1
f ðV1 ; V2 Þ ¼ V2 ; gðV1 ; V2 Þ ¼ ½
þ   V2   V1 þ  V_ S ðt)
C1  R1 Rs  C1 C1  L1 Rs  C1
@f @f @g 1 @g 1 1
¼ 0; ¼ 1; ¼ ; ¼ ð þ Þ
@V1 @V2 @V1 C1  L1 @V2 C1  R1 Rs  C1

0 dU 1
1   !
B dt C 0 1 U1
@ A¼  C11L1 ½C11R1 þ

RC1 
1
dU2 U2
dt

The basic Active RFID Forced Van Der Pol’s equation


12 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

:: 1 1 1 : 1 1
e  1 ) V þð þ Þ V þ V ¼  V_ S ðtÞ
R1 Rs C1 L1  C1 Rs  C1
1 1 1 1 1
then /ðxÞ ¼ 1; a ¼ ½ð þ Þ  ; ! 1ðL1  C1  1Þ; b ¼
R1 Rs C1 L1  C1 Rs  C1

In our case /ðVÞ ¼ 1; /ðVÞ [ 0 for jVj [ 1 and V_ S ðtÞ is T periodic


and,ðR11 þ Rs
1
Þ  C11 , RsC
1
1
is non-negative parameters. It is convenient to rewrite the
Active RFID forced Van Der Pol’s equation as an autonomous system.

dh : 1 1 1 : 1
h¼t) ¼ 1; V ¼ Y  ð þ Þ   /ðVÞ; Y ¼ V þ  V_ S ðhÞ
dt R1 Rs C1 R1  C1
:
h ¼ 1; ðV; Y; hÞ 2 R2 x S1 :

/ðVÞ ¼ 1 remain strictly positive as jVj ! 1 for unforced system, R11C1 


V_ S ðhÞ ! 0 but R11C1 6¼ 0 then V_ S ðhÞ ¼ 0 no energy is supplied to the Active RFID
TAG, become Passive RFID TAG. First, we suppose that a  1ððR11 þ Rs 1
Þ  C11  1Þ
is a small parameter, so the autonomous system is a perturbation of linear oscillator.
: :
V ¼ Y; Y ¼ V Has a phase plane filled with circular periodic orbits each period
of 2  p. Using regular perturbation or averaging methods, we can show that pre-
cisely one of these orbits is preserved under the perturbation. Selecting the
invertible transformation:
!   !
n1 cosðtÞ  sinðtÞ V
¼ 
n2  sinðtÞ  cosðtÞ Y

Which “freezes” the unperturbed system and


The autonomous system become:
: 1 1 1
n1 ¼ ð þ Þ  cos t  ½ðn1  cosðtÞ  n2  sinðtÞÞ3 =3  ðn1  cosðtÞ  n2  sinðtÞÞ
R1 Rs C1
: 1 1 1
n2 ¼ ð þ Þ   sin t  ½ðn1  cosðtÞ  n2  sinðtÞÞ3 =3  ðn1  cosðtÞ  n2  sinðtÞÞ
R1 Rs C1

This transformation is orientation reversing approximations the function n1; n2


: :
which vary slowly because n1 ; n2 being small. Integrating each function with
respect to time (t) from 0 to T ¼ 2  p, holding n1; n2 fixed we obtain:
: 1 1 1
n1 ¼ ð þ Þ  n  ½1  ðn1 2 þ n2 2 Þ=4=2
R1 Rs C1 1
: 1 1 1
n2 ¼ ð þ Þ   n  ½1  ðn1 2 þ n2 2 Þ=4=2
R1 Rs C1 2
1.1 Active RFID TAGs System Analysis of Energy Consumption … 13

2
This system is correct at first order, but there is an error of Oð½ðR11 þ RsÞ
1
 C11  Þ .
In polar coordinates, we therefore have

: r 1 1 1 r2 1 1 1 2
r¼ ð þ Þ  ð1  Þ þ Oð½ð þ Þ   Þ
2 R1 Rs C1 4 R1 Rs C1
: 1 1 1 2
u ¼ 0 þ Oð½ð þ Þ   Þ
R1 Rs C1
2
Neglecting the Oð½ðR11 þ Rs
1
Þ  C11  Þ terms this system has an attracting circle of
fixed points at r = 2 reflecting the existence of a one parameter family of almost
sinusoidal solutions: V ¼ rðtÞ  cosðt þ uðtÞÞ with slowly varying amplitude

1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2
rðtÞ ¼ 2 þ Oð½ð þ Þ   Þ; uðtÞ ¼ u0 þ Oð½ð þ Þ   Þ
R1 Rs C1 R1 Rs C1
2
1 1 1
uðtÞ ¼ u0 þ Oð½ð þ Þ   Þ
R1 Rs C1

Constant u0 is being determined by initial conditions.


When the value of ðR11 þ Rs 1
Þ  C11 is not small the averaging procedure no longer
works and other methods must be used. The investigation can be done for Active
RFID’s system forced Van Der Pole. Let’s consider V_ S ðtÞ 6¼ 0 we suppose
ðR11 þ Rs
1
Þ  C11 ; RsC
1
1
 1 and use the same transformation as we use in the unforced
_
system V S ðtÞ 6¼ 0 . When our interest in the periodic forced response we use the 2p x
periodic transformation [2–4].
!   !
n1 cosðxtÞ  x1  sinðxtÞ V
¼ 
n2  sinðxtÞ  x1  cosðxtÞ Y

: 1 1 1 x2 1
n1 ¼ ð þ Þ  /ðVÞ  cosðx  tÞ  ð Þ  V  sinðx  tÞ
R1 Rs C1 x
1
  sinðx  t  V_ S ðtÞÞ
Rs  C1  x
: 1 1 1 x2 1
n2 ¼ ð þ Þ   /ðVÞ  sinðx  tÞ  ð Þ  V  cosðx  tÞ
R1 Rs C1 x
1
  cosðx  t  V_ S ðtÞÞ
Rs  C1  x
1
C1 L1 ! 1; /ðVÞ ¼ 1 in our case.
14 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

: 1 1 1 x2 1 1
n1 ¼ ð þ Þ  cosðx  tÞ  ð Þ  V  sinðx  tÞ   sinðx  t  V_ S ðtÞÞ
R1 Rs C1 x Rs  C1  x
: 1 1 1 x2 1 1
n2 ¼ ð þ Þ   sinðx  tÞ  ð Þ  V  cosðx  tÞ   cosðx  t  V_ S ðtÞÞ
R1 Rs C1 x Rs  C1  x

Active RFID TAG system can be represented as Voltage source (internal


resistance), Parallel Resistor, Capacitor, and Inductance circuit. Linear bifurcation
system explains Active RFID TAG system behavior for any initial condition V(t)
and dV(t)/dt . Active RFID’s Coil is a very critical element in Active RFID TAG
functionality. Optimization can be achieved by Coil’s parameters inspection and
System bifurcation controlled by them. Spiral, Circles, and other Active RFID
phase system behaviors can be optimized for better Active RFID TAG performance
and actual functionality. Active RFID TAG losses also controlled for best perfor-
mance and maximum efficiency.

1.2 RFID TAG’s Dimensional Parameters Optimization


as Excitable Linear Bifurcation Systems

RFID Equivalent circuits of a Label can be represented as Parallel circuit of


Capacitance (Cpl), Resistance (Rpl), and Inductance (Lpc). The Label measurement
principle is as follows: Label positioned in defining distance to measurement coil,
Low current or voltage source, Measuring of |Z| and Teta of measurement coil,
Resonance frequency fro at Teta = 0, Calculation of unloaded quality factor Q0 out
of measured bandwidth B0. The Coil design procedure is based on three important
steps. The RFID equivalent circuit can be represented as a differential equation
which, depending on variable parameter. The investigation of RFID’s differential
equation based on bifurcation theory [1], the study of possible changes in the
structure of the orbits of a differential equation depending on variable parameters.
We first illustrate certain observations and analyze local bifurcations of an appro-
priate arbitrary scalar differential equation [2]. Since the implicit function theorem
is the main ingredient used in these generalizations, include a precise statement of
this theorem. Additional analyze the bifurcations of a RFID’s differential equation
on the circle. The bifurcation behavior of specific differential equations can be
encapsulated in certain pictures called bifurcation diagrams. Analysis is done for
optimization of RFID TAG’s dimensional parameters to get the best performance.
RFID TAG can be represented as a parallel Equivalent Circuit of Capacitor and
Resistor in parallel. For example, see below NXP/PHILIPS ICODE IC, Parallel
equivalent circuit and simplified complete equivalent circuit of the label (L1 is the
antenna inductance) [7, 85] (Fig. 1.8).
1.2 RFID TAG’s Dimensional Parameters Optimization … 15

I-CODE RFID
TAG

LA LB

Fig. 1.8 NXP/PHILIPS ICODE IC, Parallel equivalent circuit and simplified complete equivalent
circuit of the label (L1 is the antenna inductance)

C1 ¼ Cic þ Ccon þ Cc; R1 ¼ ðRic  RpcÞ=ðRic þ RpcÞ:


Zt1
dIl dVc 1
Vl1 ¼ L  ; Ic1 ¼ C  ; Il1 ¼  Vl1  dt
dt dt L1
0

X
i¼3 Zt¼t1
V dV 1
Ii ¼ 0; þ C1  þ  V  dt ¼ 0
i¼1
R1 dt L1
t¼0
1 dV d2V 1
 þ C1  2 þ V ¼0
R1 dt dt L1

We get differential equation of RFID TAG system which describe the evolution
of the system in continues time. V = V(t).
Now I define the following Variable setting definitions:, And get the dynamic
dt ¼ V2 , dt ¼  C1 R1  V2  C1 L1  V1
equation system: dV 1 dV2 1 1

The system shape is as nonlinear system equations:

dV1 dV2
¼ f1 ðV1 ; V2 . . .; VnÞ;
dt dt

The V1 and V2 variables are the phase space dimension two. Now Let’s Move to
three variable system—which the time (t) is the third variable, V3 = t (Fig. 1.9).

dV1 dV2 1 1 dV3


¼ V2; ¼  V1   V2 ; ¼1
dt dt C1  L1 C1  R1 dt

d ¼ 2  ðt þ wÞ=p; Aavg ¼ a0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ; Bavg ¼ b0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ

a0, b0—Overall dimensions of the coil. Aavg, Bavg—Average dimensions of the


coil. t—Track thickness, w—Track width, g—Gap between tracks. Nc—Number of
turns, d—Equivalent diameter of the track. Average coil area; −Ac = Aavg  Bavg.
Integrating all those parameters gives the equations for inductance calculation:
16 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Aavg

A0

w B0 Bavg

Fig. 1.9 RFID’s coil dimensional parameters

!
2  Aavg  Bavg
X1 ¼ Aavg  ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d  ðAavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
!
2  Aavg  Bavg
X2 ¼ Bavg  ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d  ðBavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
 ffi
X3 ¼ 2  Aavg þ Bavg  Aavg þ Bavg ; X4 ¼ ðAavg þ BavgÞ=4
2 2

The RFID’s coil calculation inductance expression is


hl i
Lcalc ¼ 0
 ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp ; L1 ¼ Lcalc
p

Definition of limits, Estimations: Track thickness t, Al and Cu coils (t > 30 lm).


The printed coils as high as possible. Estimation of turn exponent p is needed for
inductance calculation.

Coil manufacturing technology P


Wired 1.8–1.9
Etched 1.75–1.85
Printed 1.7–1.8

Now I integrate the Lcalc value inside the differential equations which charac-
terize the RFID system with the Coil inductance.
1.2 RFID TAG’s Dimensional Parameters Optimization … 17

dV1
¼ 0  V1 þ 1  V2 þ 0  V3
dt
dV2 1 1
¼    V1   V2 þ 0  V3
dt C1  lp0  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp C1  R1
dV3
¼ 0  V1 þ 0  V2 þ 0  V3 þ 1
dt

The above differential equations can be represented as Matrix formulation:


2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3
dV1 0 1 0 V1 0
6 dV
dt
7 4 f l 1
g f C11R1 g 0 5  4 V2 5 þ 4 0 5
4 dt2 5¼ C1 ½ p0 ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp 
dV3 V3 1
dt 0 0 0
2 3
2 3 0 1 0 2 3 2 3
dV1
6  g 07 V1 0
7 6 f f C11R1 g
1
6 dV
dt
P 7 4 5 4 5
4 dt2 5¼6 7  V2 þ 0
4
l0
4 C1  p ðX3 þ Xk ÞNc p
5
dV3 k¼1;k6¼3 V3 1
dt
0 0 0

And denote the matrix’s elements as functions K1 and K2 of Coil overall


parameters.

1
K1 ¼ K1 ða0 ; b0 ; w; g; d; NC ; t; p; C1 ; R1 Þ ¼ f l0 g
C1  p  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp
1
K2 ¼ K2 ða0 ; b0 ; w; g; d; NC ; t; p; C1 ; R1 Þ ¼ f g
C1  R1

Denote the RFID Matrix systems with those K1, K2 parameter function gives:
 dV1  
0 1 V1
dt
dV2 ¼ 
dt
K1 K2 V2

Now the consideration of trajectories of the form [3]: VðtÞ ¼ ekt  S, Where
S <> 0 is some fixed vector to be determined, and k is a growth rate, also to be
determined. If a such solution exists, they correspond to exponential motion along
the line spanned by the vector S. To find the condition on S and k, we substitute
: 0 1
VðtÞ ¼ ekt  S into V ¼ A  V; A ¼ and obtain k  ekt  S ¼ ekt  A  S
K1 K2
and cancellation the nonzero scalar factor ekt yields to k  S ¼ A  S which state that
the desired straight line solutions exist if S is an eigenvector of A with corre-
sponding eigenvalue k and the solution is Eigen solution. The eigenvalues of a
matrix A are given by the characteristic equation detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 when I is the
1 0
identity matrix I ¼ , we get
0 1
18 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

D ¼ detðAÞ ¼ 0  K1 ¼ K1
s ¼ traceðAÞ ¼ 0 þ K2 ¼ K2
k2  s  k þ D ¼ 0
k2  K2  k  K1 ¼ 0
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1
k1;2 ¼  K2
 K22 þ 4  K1
2 2

The above k1;2 is a quadratic solution. The typical solution is for the eigenvalues
are distinct k1 6¼ k2 . In this case, a theorem of linear algebra states that the cor-
responding eigenvectors S1 and S2 are linearly independent, and hence span the
entire plane. Any initial condition V0 can be written as a linear combination of
eigenvectors, V0 ¼ C1  S1 þ C2  S2 . Then the general solution for V(t) it is simply
VðtÞ ¼ C1  ek1 t  S1 þ C2  ek2 t  S2 . By insertion quadratic solutions into the last
V(t) equation we get
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
VðtÞ ¼ C1  e½2K2 þ 2 K2 þ 4K1 t S1 þ C2  e½2K2 2 K2 þ 4K1 t S2
1 1 2 1 1 2

RFID TAG which gives the best performance is one that his equivalent circuit
(Capacitor, Resistor, and Inductance (Antenna) in parallel), and his Voltage/Voltage
derivative respect to time phase plane converge (Spiral converge, fixed point
respect to the origin, etc.,)
k2 \k1 \0
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 1 1
 K2   K22 þ 4  K1 \  K2 þ  K22 þ 4  K1 \0
2 2 2 2
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
k1 \0. . . ! . . .  K2 [ K22 þ 4  K1
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2
1 1 1
 f g [ f g þ 4  f  l0 g
C1  R1 C1  R1 C1  p  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2
1 1 4
[ f g f  g
C1  R1 C1  R1 C1  lp0  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp
k2 \k1
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 1 1
 K2   K22 þ 4  K1 \  K2 þ  K22 þ 4  K1
2 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 2 2
0\ K22 þ 4  K1 ! K22 þ 4  K1 [ 0 ! K22 [  4  K1

2
1 1
f g [  4  f l g
C1  R1 C1  p  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp
0

2
1 4
f g [ l0 
C1  R1 C1  p  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp
1.2 RFID TAG’s Dimensional Parameters Optimization … 19

Then both Eigen solutions decay exponentially. The fixed point is a stable node,
except eigenvectors are not mutually perpendicular, in general. Trajectories typi-
cally approach the origin tangent to the slow Eigen direction, defined as the
direction spanned by the eigenvector with the smaller jkj . In backward time t ! 1
the trajectories become parallel to the fast Eigen direction [2–4] (Fig. 1.10).
If we reverse all the arrows in the above figure, we obtain a typical phase portrait
for an unstable node. Now I investigate the case when eigenvalues are complex
number. If the eigenvalues are complex, the fixed point is either a center or a spiral.
The origin is surrounded by a family of closed orbits. Note that centers are neutrally
stable, since nearby trajectories are neither attracted to nor repelled from the fixed
point. A spiral would occur if the RFID system were lightly damped. Then the
trajectory would just fail to close, because the RFID system loses a bit of energy on
each cycle. To justify these statements, recall that the eigenvalues are
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
k1;2 ¼ 12  K2
12  K22 þ 4  K1 ; K22 þ 4  K1 \0
To simplify the notation, let’s write the eigenvalues as
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1
k1;2 ¼ a
i  x ; a ¼  K2 ; x ¼   K22 þ 4  K1
2 2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
x 6¼ 0 9 VðtÞ ¼ C1  e½2 2 2 2
K þ  1
S1 þ C2  e½2K2 2 K2 þ 4K1 t S2
1 1
K 2 þ 4K t 1 1 2

C0 s; S0 s complex, since; k0 s complex


VðtÞ ¼ C1  e½a þ ixt  S1 þ C2  e½aixt  S2
Euler’s formula ! e½ixt ¼ cos½x  t þ i  sin½x  t

Hence V(t) is a combination of terms involving

eat  cos½x  t; eat  sin½x  t

Such terms represent exponentially decaying oscillations if a ¼ ReðkÞ\0, And


growing if a [ 0 . The corresponding fixed points are stable and unstable spirals,

Fig. 1.10 Voltage/Voltage V2


derivative respect to time
converge after the reader
carrier signal end Case 1

V1
20 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Fig. 1.11 For both centers


and spirals, rotation is
clockwise or Counter
clockwise

respectively. If the eigenvalues are pure imaginary a ¼ 0, then all the solutions are
periodic with period T ¼ 2px . The oscillators have fixed amplitude and the fixed
point is centered. For both centers and spirals, it’s easy to determine whether the
rotation is clockwise or counterclockwise (Fig. 1.11).

1 1
a¼  K2 ¼ f g
2 2  C1  R1
1 1
Decaying oscillators 8 a\0 ! f g\0 ! [0
2  C1  R1 2  C1  R1
1 1
Growing oscillators 8 a [ 0 ! f g[0 ! \0
2  C1  R1 2  C1  R1

C1, R1 > 0 always then only the first behavior, decaying oscillator can exist in
our RFID system. In all analysis until now, we have been assuming that the
eigenvalues are distinct. What happens if the eigenvalues are equal? Suppose
eigenvalues are equal k1 ¼ k2 ¼ k, then there are two possibilities: either there are
two independent eigenvectors corresponding to k, or there’s only one. If there are
two independent eigenvectors, then they span the plane and so every vector is an
eigenvector with this same eigenvalue k . To see this, let’s write an arbitrary vector
X0 as a linear combination of the two eigenvectors: X0 = C1  S1 + C2  S2.
Then A  X0 ¼ A  ðC1  S1 þ C2  S2 Þ ¼ C1  k  S1 þ C2  k  S2 ¼ k  X0
X0 is also an eigenvector with eigenvalue k . Since the multiplication by A
simply stretches
 every vector by a factor k, the matrix must be a multiple of the
k 0
identity: A ¼ then if k 6¼ 0, all trajectories are straight lines through the
0 k
origin XðtÞ ¼ ekt X0 and the fixed point is a star node. On the other hand, if k = 0
the whole plane is filled with fixed points. Let’s now sketch the above options with
RFID Overall parameter restriction. k1 ¼ k2 ¼ k 6¼ 0 then (Fig. 1.12)
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 1 1
 K2 þ  K22 þ 4  K1 ¼  K2   K22 þ 4  K1
2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
q 2 2 2
K22 þ 4  K1 ¼ 0 ! K22 þ 4  K1 ¼ 0 ! K22 ¼ 4  K1
l0
 ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp ¼ C1  4  R21
p
1.2 RFID TAG’s Dimensional Parameters Optimization … 21

Fig. 1.12 Voltage/Voltage V2


derivative respect to time
Converge after the reader
Carrier signal end Case 2

V1

Now let’s summarize the classification of fixed points in RFID system based on
all investigation I did. It is easy to show the type and stability of all the different
fixed points on a single diagram [4] (Figs. 1.13 and 1.14).
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s2  4  D ¼ K22 þ 4  K1 ¼ 0; ! K2 ¼ 2  K1
s ¼ traceðAÞ ¼ K2 ; D ¼ detðAÞ ¼ K1
1 h pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffii
k2  K2  k  K1 ¼ 0; k1;2 ¼  s
s2  4  D
2
s ¼ k1 þ k2 ¼ K2 ; D ¼ k1  k2 ¼ K1
Charecteristic equation : ðk  k1 Þ  ðk  k2 Þ ¼ k2  s  k þ D ¼ 0

Fig. 1.13 Stable/Unstable Unstable


diagram nodes

Unstable
spirals
Saddle
points Centers

stable
spirals

stable
nodes
22 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Δ < 0....( K1 > 0) Δ > 0....( K1 < 0) Δ = 0....( K1 = 0)

The eigenvalues are The eigenvalues are At least one of the


real and have opposite either real with the same eigenvalues is zero.
sign hence the fixed sign (nodes), or complex Then the origin is not an
point is a saddle point, conjugate (spiral & isolated fixed point.
centers). There is either a whole
line of a fixed point , or a
plane of fixed point

Fig. 1.14 Stable Unstable diagram as function of K1

Nodes satisfy s2  4  D [ 0 and spirals satisfy s2  4  D\0 . The parabola


s  4  D ¼ 0 is the borderline between nodes and spirals. Star nodes and
2

degenerate nodes live on this parabola. The stability of the nodes and spirals is
determined by s value. When s\0, both eigenvalues have negative real parts, so
the fixed point is stable. Unstable spirals and nodes have s [ 0 . Neutrally stable
centers live on the borderline s ¼ 0, where eigenvalues are purely imaginary [5].

1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability Optimization


Under Delayed Electromagnetic Interferences

The RFID TAG system has two main variables TAG’s voltage and TAG’s voltage
derivative respect to time. Due to electromagnetic interferences those variables have
delays in time domain. We define s1 as a time delay respect to TAG’s voltage and
s2 as a time delay respect to TAG’s voltage derivative. RFID Equivalent circuits of
a Label can be represented as Parallel circuit of Capacitance (Cpl), Resistance
(Rpl), and Inductance (Lpc). Our RFID TAG system delay differential and delay
different model can be analytically by using delay differential equations in
dynamically. The need of the incorporation of a time delay is often of the existence
of any stage structure. It is often difficult to analytically study models with delay
dependent parameters, even if only a single discrete delay is present. There are
practical guidelines that combine graphical information with analytical work to
effectively study the local stability of models involving delay dependent parame-
ters. The stability of a given steady state is simply determined by the graphs of
some function of s1, s2 which can be expressed, explicitly and thus can be easily
depicted by Matlab and other popular software. We need only look at one such
function and locate the zero. This function often has only two zeroes, providing
thresholds for stability switches. As time delay increases, stability changes from
stable to unstable to stable. We emphasize the local stability aspects of some models
with delay dependent parameters. Additionally, there is a general geometric
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 23

criterion that, theoretically speaking, can be applied to models with many delays, or
even distributed delays. The simplest case of a first order characteristic equation,
providing more user friendly geometric and analytic criteria for stability switches.
The analytical criteria provided for the first and second order cases can be used to
obtain some insightful analytical statements and can be helpful for conducting
simulations. RFID TAG can be represented as a parallel Equivalent Circuit of
Capacitor and Resistor in parallel. For example, see below NXP/PHILIPS
ICODE IC, Parallel equivalent circuit and simplified complete equivalent circuit
of the label (L1 is the antenna inductance) [6, 8] (Fig. 1.15).

1 dV d2 V 1
 þ C1  2 þ V ¼0
R1 dt dt L1

We get differential equation of a RFID TAG system which describe the evo-
lution of the system in continues time. V = V(t). Now I define the following
Variable setting definitions: V2 ¼ dV dt ¼ dt ; V1 ¼ V. The dynamic equation system:
1 dV

dt ¼ V2 ; dt ¼  C1 R1  V2  C1 L1  V1 (Fig. 1.16)


dV1 dV2 1 1

d ¼ 2  ðt þ wÞ=p; Aavg ¼ a0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ; Bavg ¼ b0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ

a0, b0—Overall dimensions of the coil. Aavg, Bavg—Average dimensions of the


coil. t—Track thickness, w—Track width, g—Gap between tracks. Nc—Number of
turns, d—Equivalent diameter of the track. Average coil area; −Ac = Aavg . Bavg.
Integrating all those parameters gives the equations for inductance calculation:

Fig. 1.15 NXP/PHILIPS


ICODE IC, Parallel I-CODE RFID TAG
equivalent circuit and
simplified complete LA LB
equivalent circuit of the label
(L1 is the antenna inductance)

Antenn
24 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Fig. 1.16 RFID’s coil Aavg


dimensional parameters
A0

w B0 Bavg

!
2  Aavg  Bavg
X1 ¼ Aavg  ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d  ðAavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
!
2  Aavg  Bavg
X2 ¼ Bavg  ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d  ðBavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
 ffi
X3 ¼ 2  Aavg þ Bavg  Aavg2 þ Bavg2 ; X4 ¼ ðAavg þ BavgÞ=4


The RFID’s coil calculation inductance is Lcalc ¼ lp0  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4  Ncp 
L1 = Lcalc. Definition of limits, Estimations: Track thickness t, Al and Cu coils
(t > 30 lm).
 dV1 " # 
0 1 V1
dt
dV2 ¼ f C l0
1
g f C11R1 g  V2
dt ½
1  p ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp 

Due to electromagnetic interferences, we get RFID TAG’s voltage and voltage


derivative with delays s1 and s2 respectively V1(t) ! V1(t − s1); V2(t) !
V2(t − s1). We consider no delay effect on dV1/dt and dV2/dt. The RFID TAG’s
differential equations under electromagnetic interference effects (we consider
electromagnetic interferences (delay terms) influence only RFID TAG voltage V1(t)
and voltage derivative V2(t) respect to time, there is no influence on dV1(t)/dt and
dV2(t)/dt):
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 25

dV1
¼ V2 ðt  s2 Þ
dt
dV2 1 1
¼ f  g  V1 ðt  s1 Þ   V2 ðt  s2 Þ
dt C1  lp0  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp C1  R1

To find the Equilibrium points (fixed points) of the RFID TAG system is by

lim V1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ V1 ðtÞ; lim V2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ V2 ðtÞ;


t!1 t!1
dV1 ðtÞ dV2 ðtÞ
¼ 0; ¼0
dt dt
8 t  s1 ; t  s2 9 ðt  s1 Þ  t; ðt  s2 Þ  t; t ! 1

ð0Þ ð0Þ
We get two equations and the only fixed point is E ð0Þ ðV1 ; V2 Þ ¼ ð0; 0Þ.
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the equi-
librium points of RFID TAG system consists in adding to coordinate [V1 ; V2 
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form, and retaining the first order terms
in v1, v2. The system of two homogeneous equations leads to a polynomial char-
acteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The polynomial characteristic equations
accept by set the below voltage and voltage derivative respect to time into two
RFID TAG system equations. RFID TAG system fixed values with arbitrarily small
increments of exponential form ½v1 v2   ekt are: i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1
(second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point).
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V1 ðtÞ ¼ V1 þ v1  ekt ; V2 ðtÞ ¼ V2 þ v2  ekt ;
ðiÞ
V1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ V1 þ v1  ekðts1 Þ
ðiÞ
V2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ V2 þ v2  ekðts2 Þ 8 i ¼ 0; 1; 2

We choose the above expressions for our V1 ðtÞ; V2 ðtÞ as small displacement
[v1 ; v2 ] from the system fixed points in time t = 0.

ðiÞ ðiÞ
V1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V1 þ v1 ; V2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V2 þ v2

for k\0; t [ 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k [ 0; t [ 0 is


Unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for
k\0; t [ 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k Is the
eigenvalue parameter which establishes if the fixed point is stable or Unstable,
additionally his absolute value (jkj) establish the speed of flow toward or away from
the selected fixed point [1, 2].
26 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

k<0 k>0
t=0 V1(t = 0) = V(i)
1 + v1 V1(t = 0) = V(i)
1 + v1
V2(t = 0) = V(i)
2 + v2 V2(t = 0) = V(i)
2 + v2
t>0 V1(t) = V(i)
1 + v1e−|k|t V1(t) = V(i)
1 + v1e|k|t
−|k|t
V2(t) = V(i)
2 + v2e V2(t) = V(i)
2 + v2e
|k|t

t<0 V1(t ! ∞) = V1 (i)


V1(t ! ∞, k > 0) * v1e|k|•t
V2(t ! ∞) = V(i) 2 V2(t ! ∞, k > 0) * v2e|k|•t

The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for RFID TAG
system voltage and voltage derivative respect to time are
ðiÞ ðiÞ
dV1 ðtÞ V1 ðt þ DtÞ  V1 ðtÞ V þ v1  ekðt þ DtÞ ½V1 þ v1  ekt 
¼ lim ¼ lim 1
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
v1  ekt ½ekDt 1 ekDt 1 þ kDt v1  ekt ½1 þ k  Dt  1
¼ lim ! lim ¼ k  v1  ekt
Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
dV2 ðtÞ V2 ðt þ DtÞ  V2 ðtÞ V þ v2  ekðt þ DtÞ ½V2 þ v2  ekt 
¼ lim ¼ lim 2
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
v2  ekt ½ekDt 1 ekDt 1 þ kDt v2  ekt ½1 þ k  Dt  1
¼ lim ! lim ¼ k  v2  ekt
Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt

And the time derivative of the above equations:

dV1 ðtÞ dV2 ðtÞ


¼ v1  k  ekt ; ¼ v2  k  ekt ;
dt dt
dV1 ðt  s1 Þ
¼ v1  k  ekðts1 Þ ¼ v1  k  ekt  es1 k
dt
dV2 ðt  s2 Þ
¼ v2  k  ekðts2 Þ ¼ v2  k  ekt  es2 k
dt
dV1
First, we take the RFID TAG’s voltage (V1) differential equation: ¼ V2 and
dt
adding to its coordinates [V1V2]. Arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½v1 v2   ekt and retaining the first order terms in v1, v2.

ðiÞ ði¼0Þ
k  v1  ekt ¼ V2 þ v2  ekt ; V2 ¼ 0 ;  k  v1 þ v 2 ¼ 0
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 27

dV2
Second, we take the RFID TAG’s voltage (V2) differential equation: ¼
dt
1 1
f hl ig  V1 ðtÞ   V2 ðtÞ and adding to its
C1  0
 ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   N c
p C1  R1
p
coordinates [V1V2] arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½v1 v2   ekt and
retaining the first order terms in v1, v2.

dV2 1 1
¼ f hl ig  V1 ðtÞ   V2 ðtÞ
dt C1  0
 ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   N pc C1  R1
p
1
kt
k  v2  e ¼ f hl ig  ðV1ðiÞ þ v1  ekt Þ
C1  0
 ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   N cp
p
1 ðiÞ
  ðV2 þ v2  ekt Þ
C1  R1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V1 ¼ 0; V2 ¼ 0

1 1
k  v2  f l0 g  v1   v2 ¼ 0
C1  ½  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp  C1  R1
p

We can summery our system eigenvalues equations: k  v1 þ v2 ¼ 0

1 1
f l0 g  v1  k  v2   v2 ¼ 0
C1  ½  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Nc  p C 1  R1
p
0 1 !
k 1
v
@ f l 1
g k  C11R1 A 
1
¼0
C1 ½
0
 ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp  v2
p
0 1
k 1
A  k  I ¼ @ f l 1
g k  C11R1 A ;
C1 ½
0
 ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp 
p
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0

1 1
k  ðk þ Þþ l0 ¼0
C1  R1 C1  ½  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp 
p

We get two eigenvalues: k1 ; k2 . If k1 \0; k2 \0 then we have stable node.


If k1 [ 0; k2 [ 0 then we have unstable node. If k1  k2 \0 then we have saddle
point.
If k1 ¼ k2 \0 then we have attracting focus. If we have k1 \k2 ¼ 0 then we
have attracting line. If we have k1 ¼ 0\k2 then we have repelling line. If we have
28 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

0\k1 ¼ k2 then we have repelling focus. If k1 ; k2 are complex conjugate and the
real part is negative than we have attracting spiral otherwise (positive real part)
repelling spiral. If the real part is zero then we have a center. We define

ðiÞ ðiÞ
V1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ V1 þ v1  ekðts1 Þ ; V2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ V2 þ v2  ekðts2 Þ :

Then we get two delayed differential equations respect to adding to its coordi-
nates [V1V2] arbitrarily small increments of exponential form½v1 v2   ekt .

ðiÞ ði¼0Þ
v1  k  ekt ¼ V2 þ v2  ekðts2 Þ ; V2 ¼ 0 ) v1  k  ekt ¼ v2  ekðts2 Þ

1 1
k  v2  ekt ¼ f l0 g  V1ðiÞ  V
ðiÞ
C1  p  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Nc p C1  R1 2
1
þ f l g  v1  ekðts1 Þ
C1  p  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp
0

1
  v2  ekðts2 Þ
C1  R1
ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ
In the equilibrium fixed point V1 ¼V2 ¼ 0 and in the equilibrium fixed
point

ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ 1 1
V1 ¼ V2 ¼ 0; f l0 g  V1ðiÞ  ðiÞ
 V2 ¼ 0
C1 
p  ½ X1 þ X2  X 3 þ X 4   Nc p C 1  R 1
1 1
k  v2  ekt ¼ f  g  v1  e kðts 1 Þ
  v2  ekðts2 Þ
C1  lp0  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp C 1  R1

 
We define f# ðX1 ; X2 ; etc:. . .Þ ¼ lp0  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp . The small
increments Jacobian of our RFID TAG system:
" # !
k eks2 v1
 ¼ 0;
 C11f#  eks1  C11R1  eks2  k v2
" #
k eks2
AkI ¼
 C11f#  eks1  C11R1  eks2  k
1 1
det jA  k  Ij ¼ 0; Dðk; s1 ; s2 Þ ¼ k2 þ k   eks2 þ  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
C1  R1 C 1  f#

We have three stability analysis cases: s1 ¼s; s2 ¼ 0 or s2 ¼s; s1 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼


s2 ¼ s otherwise s1 6¼ s2 . We need to get characteristics equations as all above
stability analysis cases. We study the occurrence of any possible stability switching,
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 29

resulting from the increase of the value of the time delay s for the general char-
acteristic equation Dðk; sÞ. Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks
Pn
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ
k
k¼0
P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k þ P3 ðsÞ  k þ . . .:
2 3

P
m
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ
k¼0
q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 þ . . ..
First, we analyze RFID Tag system second order characteristic equation for. The
first case we analyze is when there is a delay in RFID Label voltage and no delay in
voltage time derivative [4, 5].

1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k2 þ k  þ  eks1 ;
C1  R1 C1  f#
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks

The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ:

X
n
1
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k ¼ k þ k  ;
k 2 2

k¼0
C1  R1
1
P2 ðsÞ ¼ 1; P1 ðsÞ ¼ ; P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0
C1  R1

P
m
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ: Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ ¼ C 1f . Our RFID sys-
1 #
k¼0
tem second order characteristic equation: Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ bðsÞ  k  eks þ
cðsÞ þ dðsÞ  eks
Then aðsÞ ¼ C11R1 ; bðsÞ ¼ 0; cðsÞ ¼ 0; dðsÞ ¼ C11f# s 2 R þ 0 and aðsÞ; bðsÞ;
cðsÞ; dðsÞ : R þ 0 ! R are differentiable functions of the class C1 ðR þ 0 Þ, such that
cðsÞ þ dðsÞ ¼ C11f# 6¼ 0 for all s 2 R þ 0 and for any s; bðsÞ; dðsÞ are not simulta-
neously zero. We have
30 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

1
Pðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ cðkÞ ¼ k2 þ k
C1  R1
1
Qðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ bðsÞ  k þ dðsÞ ¼
C1  f#

We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðkÞ can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is, for any real number; C11f#  x2 þ i  x  C11R1 6¼ 0

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ ðc  x2 Þ2 þ x2  a2  ðx2  b2 þ d 2 Þ

Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4 þ x2  ðC 1
2  ðC 1
2 ; Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies
1 R1 Þ 1 f# Þ

x4 þ x2  ðC 1
2  ðC 1
2 ¼ 0 and its roots are given by
1 R1 Þ 1 f# Þ

1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1
x2þ ¼  fðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ þ Dg ¼  f D  g;
2 2 ðC1  R1 Þ2
1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1
x2 ¼  fðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  Dg ¼   f D þ g
2 2 ðC1  R1 Þ2
1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1
x2 ¼  fðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  Dg ¼   f D þ g;
2 2 ðC1  R1 Þ2
1 2 1
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  4  ðc2  d 2 Þ ¼  ½ð Þ2  2 
C12 f# R1
pffiffiffiffi
Therefore the following holds: 2  x2þ =  ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ ¼
D;
pffiffiffiffi
2  x2þ = þ 1
ðC1 R1 Þ2
¼
D
Furthermore

1
PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ cðsÞ  x2 ðsÞ ¼ x2 ðsÞ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ  aðsÞ ¼ xðsÞ 
C1  R1
1
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ dðsÞ ¼ ; QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ  bðsÞ ¼ 0
C1  f#
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 31

Hence

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2
PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2
ðc  x2 Þ  x  b þ x  a  d f#
sin hðsÞ ¼ ¼x ;
x  b þd
2 2 2 R1
ðc  x2 Þ  d þ x2  a  b
cos hðsÞ ¼  ¼ x2  C1  f#
x 2  b2 þ d 2

Which jointly with x4 þ x2  ðC 1


2  ðC 1
2 ¼0 Defines the maps
1 R1 Þ 1 f# Þ

Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 , that are continuous and differentiable in s based


on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use theorem 1.2. This proves the theorem 1.3 and
theorem 1.4. Remark: a, b, c, d parameters are independent of delay parameter s
even we use aðsÞ; bðsÞ; cðsÞ; dðsÞ. Second, we analyze RFID Tag system second
order characteristic equation for s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s. The second case we analyze is
when there is no delay in RFID Label voltage and there is a delay in voltage time
derivative.

1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ k   eks2 þ  eks2
C1  R1 C1  f#
1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ ðk  þ Þ  eks ;
C1  R1 C1  f#
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks

P
n
Pn ðk; sÞ Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ
k
The expression for is
k¼0
P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k ¼ k
2 2

P2 ðsÞ ¼ 1; P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0. The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is

X
m
1 1
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ k  þ ;
k¼0
C1  R1 C1  f#
1 1
q0 ðsÞ ¼ ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ ; q2 ðsÞ ¼ 0
C1  f# C1  R1
32 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Our RFID system second order characteristic equation:

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ bðsÞ  k  eks þ cðsÞ þ dðsÞ  eks


1 1
aðsÞ ¼ 0; bðsÞ ¼ ; cðsÞ ¼ 0; dðsÞ ¼
C1  R1 C1  f#

And in the same manner like our previous case analysis:

Pðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ cðkÞ ¼ k2 ;


1 1
Qðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ bðsÞ  k þ dðsÞ ¼ k  þ
C1  R1 C1  f#

We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðkÞ can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is, for any real number x; pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0

1 1
 x2 þ i  x  6¼ 0;
C 1  f# C1  R1
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ ðc  x2 Þ2 þ x2  a2  ðx2  b2 þ d 2 Þ

Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  ðC 1
2  ðC 1
2
1 R1 Þ 1 f# Þ

Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies x  x2  ðC 4 1


2  ðC 1
2 ¼ 0 And its roots are
1 R1 Þ 1 f# Þ

given by

1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1
x2þ ¼  fðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ þ Dg ¼  f D þ g;
2 2 ðC1  R1 Þ2
1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1
x2 ¼  fðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  Dg ¼  f D þ g
2 2 ðC1  R1 Þ2
1 2 1
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  4  ðc2  d 2 Þ ¼ 2  ½ð Þ2 þ 2 
C1 f# R1

Therefore the following holds:


pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi
2  x2þ =  ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ ¼
D; 2  x2þ = þ 2
¼
D
ðC1  R1 Þ
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 33

Furthermore
PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ cðsÞ  x2 ðsÞ ¼ x2 ðsÞ;
1
PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ  aðsÞ ¼ 0; QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ dðsÞ ¼
C 1  f#
1
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ  bðsÞ ¼ xðsÞ  ;
C1  R1
PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2
PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼  ;
jQði  x; sÞj2
ðc  x2 Þ  x  b þ x  a  d x3  C1  R1
sin hðsÞ ¼ ¼
x2  b2 þ d 2 x2 þ ðRf 1 Þ2 #

ðc  x Þ  d þ x  a  b
2 2 x  C1  Rf#1
2
cos hðsÞ ¼  ¼
x 2  b2 þ d 2 x2 þ ðRf#1 Þ2

Which jointly with


1 1
x4  x2  2
 ¼0
ðC1  R1 Þ ðC1  f# Þ2

Defines the maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0


Defines the maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 are continuous and differen-
tiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use theorem 1.2. This proves the
theorem 1.3 and theorem 1.4. Remark: a, b, c, d parameters are independent of
delay parameter s even we use aðsÞ; bðsÞ; cðsÞ; dðsÞ [4, 5].
Third, we analyze RFID Tag system second order characteristic equation for
s1 ¼s; s2 ¼ s. The third case we analyze is when there is delay both in RFID Label
voltage and voltage time derivative [4, 5].
1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ k   eks þ  eks2 ;
C1  R1 C1  f#
1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ ðk  þ  eks Þ  eks
C1  R1 C1  f#
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks

The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is


Xn
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k ¼ k ; P2 ðsÞ ¼ 1;
k 2 2

k¼0

P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0:
34 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

P
m
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  k k
¼ k  C11R1 þ 1
C1 f#  eks
k¼0
Taylor expansion: eks  1  k  s þ k2 s2
2 since we need n > m [BK] analysis
we choose eks  1  k  s.

X
m
1 1 s 1
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ k  ð  Þþ ;
k¼0
C1 R1 f# C1  f#
1 1 1 s
q0 ðs; kÞ ¼ ; q1 ðsÞ ¼  ð  Þ; q2 ðsÞ ¼ 0
C1  f# C1 R1 f#

Our RFID system second order characteristic equation:

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ bðsÞ  k  eks þ cðsÞ þ dðsÞ  eks


1 1 s 1
aðsÞ ¼ 0; bðsÞ ¼  ð  Þ; cðsÞ ¼ 0; dðsÞ ¼
C1 R1 f# C1  f#

And in the same manner like our previous case analysis: Pðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ ¼
k2 ; Qðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ k  C11 ðR11  fs# Þ þ C11f#
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary
roots. That is, for any real number x; pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0

1 1 s 1
 x2 þ i  x  ð  Þþ 6¼ 0;
C1 R1 f# C1  f#
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ; Pði  x; sÞ ¼ x2
PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2 ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ 0;
1 1 s 1
Qðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ i  x  ð  Þ þ
C1 R1 f# C1  f#
1 1 s 1
QI ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x  ð  Þ; QR ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼
C1 R1 f# C 1  f#
jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ P2I þ P2R ; jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ Q2I þ Q2R ;
jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ P2I þ P2R ¼ x4
1 1 s 1
jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x2  2 ð  Þ2 þ ;
C1 R1 f# ðC1  f# Þ2
1 1 s 1
Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  2 ð  Þ2 
C1 R1 f# ðC1  f# Þ2

Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies x4  x2  C12 ðR11  fs# Þ2  ðC 1


2 ¼0
1 1 f# Þ
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 35

1 1 s 1 1 s
Fx ¼ 4  x3  2  x  ð  Þ2 ¼ 2  x  ½2  x2  2 ð  Þ2 ;
C12 R1 f# C 1 R 1 f#
2  x2 1 s
Fs ¼ ð  Þ
C12  f# R1 f#
PIx ¼ 0; PRx ¼ 2  x;
1 1 s
QIx ¼  ½  ; QRx ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0; PRs ¼ 0
C1 R1 f#
x
QIs ¼  ; QRs ¼ 0
C1  f#

The expressions for U, V can be derived easily [BK]:

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ;


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ
x 1 s 1 Fs
V ¼ 2 2 ;U ¼ 2  ½  ; xs ¼ 
C1  f# C1  f# f# R1 Fx

x
C12 f#
 ðR11  fs# Þ
And we get the expression: xs ¼ 
2  x2  C12 ðR11  fs# Þ2
1
Defines the maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0
Defines the maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and dif-
ferentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1 (see Appendix A). Hence we use theorem 1.2.
This proves the theorem 1.3 and theorem 1.4 (see Appendix D).
Remark Taylor approximation for eks  1  k  s giving us a good stability
analysis, approximation only for a restricted delay time interval.
Now we discuss RFID TAG system stability analysis under delayed variables in
time. Our RFID homogeneous system for v1, v2 leads to a characteristic equation
for the eigenvalue k having the form PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0; first case
s1 ¼s; s2 ¼ 0. Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k2 þ k  C11R1 þ C11f#  eks1 . We use different
parameters terminology from our last characteristics parameters definition:
k ! j; pk ðsÞ ! aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 2; m ¼ 0

P
2
Additionally Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! QðkÞ then PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j and
j¼0
P
0
QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j .
j¼0

1 1
PðkÞ ¼ k2 þ k  ; QðkÞ ¼ n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m
C1  R1 C1  f#
36 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

And aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable function of s such that


a0 þ c0 6¼ 0. In the following “−” denotes complex and conjugate. PðkÞ; QðkÞ
Are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s. And the coefficients:

faj ðC1 ; R1 Þ; cj ðC1 ; antenna parametrsÞg 2 R

Depend on RFID C1, R1 values and antenna parameters but not on s.


a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ C11R1 ; a2 ¼ 1; a3 ¼ 0; c0 ¼ C11f# ; c1 ¼ c2 ¼ 0
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments
ðR1 ; C1 ; antenna parametrs) will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The
coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their arguments, and
direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; C11f# 6¼ 0
8 C1 ; antenna parameters 2 R þ I.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root of the characteristic
equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions of k for which the fol-
lowing requirements of the analysis (see Kuang 1993, Sect. 3.4) can also be verified
in the present case [4, 5].
(a) If k ¼ i  x, x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0, i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
ðR1 ; C1 ; antenna parametrs) domain of interest.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj Is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
Indeed, in the limit jQðkÞ=PðkÞj ¼ j C f ðk21þ k 1 Þ j
1 # C1 R1

2 2
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj  jQði  xÞj ; Fðx; sÞ
1 1
¼ x4 þ x2  2

ðC1  R1 Þ ðC1  f# Þ2

Has at most a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a bi-cubic polynomial in x


(second degree in x2 ).
(d) Each positive root xðC1 ; R1 ; antenna parametrs) of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous
and differentiable with respect to C1 ; R1 ; antenna parametrs.
The condition can only be assessed numerically.

In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have, and Qði  xÞ ¼
Qði  xÞ thus, x [ 0 may be an eigenvalue of the characteristic equation. The
analysis consists in identifying the roots of the characteristic equation situated on
the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane, whereby increasing the parameters
C1 ; R1 ; antenna parametrs and delay s, Rek may, at the crossing, Change its sign
ð0Þ ð0Þ
from (−) to (+), i.e. from stable focus Eð0Þ ðV1 ; V2 Þ ¼ ð0; 0Þ to an unstable one, or
vice versa.
This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial
derivatives with respect to C1 ; R1 and antenna parameters.
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 37

@Rek
^1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; R1 ; antenna parameters ¼ const
@C1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðR1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; antenna parameters ¼ const
@R1 k¼ix
@Rek @Rek
^1 ðf# Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ¼ const; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ;
@f# k¼ix @s k¼ix
antenna parameters ¼ const; where x 2 R þ :

In the first case s1 ¼s; s2 ¼ 0 we get the following results

1
PR ði  xÞ ¼ a2  x2 þ a0 ¼ x2 ; PI ði  xÞ ¼ a3  x3 þ a1  x ¼ x 
C1  R1
1
QR ði  xÞ ¼ c2  x2 þ c0 ¼ ; QI ði  xÞ ¼ c1  x ¼ 0 ; FðxÞ ¼ 0
C1  f#
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
u 1 1 1 1 1 1

t
 þ4  ; þ4  [0
2 4 2 4
2  ðC1  R1 Þ 2 ðC1  R1 Þ ½C1  f#  ðC1  R1 Þ ½C1  f# 2

qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Always and additional for x 2 R; 1
2ðC1 R1 Þ2

12  1
ðC R Þ4
þ 4  ½C f1 2 [ 0
1 1 1 #

And there are two options: first always exist


qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 þ 2  þ 4  ½C f1 2 [ 0  12 
1 1 1 1
2ðC1 R1 Þ ðC1 R1 Þ4
Second 2ðC1 R1 Þ2
1 #
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1
ðC R Þ4
þ 4  1
½C f 2
[ 0
1 1 1 #

Not exist and always negative for any RFID TAG overall parameter values.
Writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, and inserting
k¼ix
Into the RFID characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin x  s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2

PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos x  s ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

Where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above sin x  s and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and
adding the sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note that FðxÞ is independent of s. Now it is important to notice that if
s 62 I (assume that I R þ 0 is the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for
s 62 I , xðsÞ is not defined. Then for all s in I xðsÞ is satisfied that Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0)
38 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Then there are no positive xðsÞ solutions of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have
stability switches. For any s 2 I, where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0
We can define the angle hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of
PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that is continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; R1 ; C1 and RFID TAG antenna parameters
ðw; g; B0 ; A0 ; Aavg ; Bavg ; etc:; Þ indicate the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us
first concentrate on ^ðxÞ, remember in kðR1 ; C1 ; w; g; B0 ; A0 ; Aavg ; Bavg ; etc:; Þ and
xðR1 ; C1 ; w; g; B0 ; A0 ; Aavg ; Bavg ; etc:; Þ, and keeping all parameters except one
(x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiating
RFID characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific
parameter (x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark x ¼ R1 ; C1 ; w; g; B0 ; A0 ; Aavg ; Bavg ; etc:;

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ
Where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . .: etc., substituting k ¼ i  x, and bearing
i Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ and i 
Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ and that on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains:

@k 1 i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þ jk¼ix ¼ ð Þ
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ;


Q ¼ QR þ i  QI ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ;Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼
QRx þ i  QIx P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I . When (x) can be any RFID TAG parameters R1, C1, and
time delay s etc., Where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments ði  x; xÞ,
and where
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ;
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ
xx ¼ Fx =Fx
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 39

We define U and V:
U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ
V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = s. PIs ¼ 0; PRs ¼ 0;


QIs ¼ 0; QRs ¼ 0 ) V ¼ 0

x2 1
U¼ ; P2 ¼ x4 þ x2  ;
C1  R1 ðC1  R1 Þ2
@F 1
Fs ¼ 0; ¼ Fx ¼ 2  ½2  x3 þ x  
@x ðC1  R1 Þ2
Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0

And differentiating with respect to s and we get


@x @x Fs @Rek
Fx  þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) ¼  ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s @s Fx @s k¼ix
h i
2  U þ s  jPj2 þ i  Fx 2  x2 þ ðC R
1
2
1 1 1Þ
^ ðsÞ ¼ Ref h i g ;
Fs þ i  2  V þ x  jPj2 x þ x  ðC R Þ2
4 2 1
1 1

@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g
@s k¼ix
@x U  @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  signfs  þxþ g;
@s jPj2
@x Fs @x
¼ xs ¼  ; Fs ¼ 0 ) ¼0
@s Fx @s

Then we get signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signf2  x  ½2  x2 þ 1


ðC1 R1 Þ2
g  signfxg
1 1
Result: ^ ðsÞ [ 0 for all x; R1 ; C1 values. The sign of ^ ðsÞ is independent of
s values, then in the first case s1 ¼s; s2 ¼ 0 there is no stability switch for different
values s. We now inspect the third interesting case when s1 ¼s; s2 ¼ s. The third
case we analyze is when there are delays both in RFID Label voltage and voltage
time derivative [4, 5].
1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ k   eks þ  eks2
C1  R1 C1  f#

Taylor expansion:

k2  s 2
eks  1  k  s þ
2
40 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Since we need n > m [BK] analysis, we choose eks  1  k  s then we get our
RFID system second order characteristic equation:

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ bðsÞ  k  eks þ cðsÞ þ dðsÞ  eks


1 1 s 1
aðsÞ ¼ 0; bðsÞ ¼  ð  Þ; cðsÞ ¼ 0; dðsÞ ¼
C1 R1 f# C 1  f#
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ ðc  x2 Þ2 þ x2  a2  ðx2  b2 þ d 2 Þ
1 1
Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  2

ðC1  R1 Þ ðC1  f# Þ2

Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies x4  x2  C12 ðR11  fs# Þ2  ðC 1


2 ¼ 0 and its roots are
1 1 f# Þ

given by

1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1 1 s
x2þ ¼  fðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ þ Dg ¼  f D þ 2 ð  Þ2 g
2 2 C1 R1 f#
1 p ffiffiffi
ffi 1 p ffiffiffi
ffi 1 1 s
x2 ¼  fðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  Dg ¼  f D þ 2 ð  Þ2 g
2 2 C1 R1 f#
1 1 s 4
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  4  ðc2  d 2 Þ ¼ 2  ð  Þ2 þ
C1 R1 f# ðC1  f# Þ2
pffiffiffiffi
Therefore the following holds: 2  x2þ =  ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ ¼
D

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2

ðc  x2 Þ  x  b þ x  a  d x3  C11  ðR11  fs# Þ


sin hðsÞ ¼ ¼
x2  b2 þ d 2 x2  C12 ðR11  fs# Þ2 þ ðC 1
2
1 1 f# Þ

ðc  x2 Þ  d þ x2  a  b x2  C11f#
cos hðsÞ ¼  ¼
x 2  b2 þ d 2 x2  1 1
ð  fs# Þ2 þ 1
C12 R1 ðC1 f# Þ2

For our stability switching analysis, we choose typical RFID parameter values:

C1 ¼ 23 pF; R1 ¼ 100 kX ¼ 105 ; Lcalc ¼ f# ¼ 2:65 mH

Then
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 41

Fig. 1.17 RFID TAG F (x, s)


function for s1 = s2 = s

Fig. 1.18 RFID TAG


stability switch diagram based
on different delay values of
our RFID TAG system

1 1
¼ 1:89  1021 ; 2 2 ¼ 2:69  1026
C12 C1  f#

We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,


complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. The table gives the list.
s 2 ½0:001::10. And can be expressed by straight line (x = s  1.64  1013)
(Fig. 1.17).

s x
0.001 1.64  1010
0.01 1.64  1011
0.05 8.2  1011
0.1 1.64  1012
(continued)
42 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

(continued)
s x
0.2 3.28  1012
1 1.64  1013
5 8.2  1013
10 1.64  1014

Remark In the above figure x variable is 1010 units.


MATLAB: [w,t] = meshgrid(1:1:1640,0:0.01:10);
f = w. * w. * w. * w − w. * w. * 1.89 * 10^21. * (10^−5 − (t./(2.65 * 10^
−3))).^2−2.69 * 10^26; meshc(f); %x ! w; s ! t
We plot the stability switch diagram based on different delay values of our RFID
TAG system (Fig. 1.18).

@Rek 2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@s Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 
@Rek 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2

@Rek
gðTauÞ ¼ ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s k¼ix

The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of

x3  C11  ðR11  fs# Þ x2  C11f#


sin hðsÞ ¼ ; cos hðsÞ ¼
x2  C12 ðR11  fs# Þ2 þ 1
ðC1 f# Þ2
x2  C12 ðR11  fs# Þ2 þ 1
ðC1 f# Þ2
1 1

When x ¼ x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally When all RFID TAG


parameters are known and the stability switch due to various time delay values s is
described in the below expression:

signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx ðxðsÞ; sÞg  signfs  xs ðxðsÞÞ


UðxðsÞÞ  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ VðxðsÞÞ
þ xðsÞ þ g
jPðxðsÞÞj2

Remark we know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies its roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which xi is a complex or imag-
inary number, then unable to analyze stability [4, 5].
RFID TAGs environment is characterized by electromagnetic interferences
which can influence the RFID TAGs stability in time. There are two main RFID
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 43

TAGs variables which are affected by electromagnetic interferences, the voltage


developed on the RFID Label and his voltage time derivative respectively.
Each RFID Label variable under electromagnetic interferences is characterized by
time delay respectively. The two time delays are not the same, but can be cate-
gorized to some sub cases due to interferences behavior. The first case is when there
is RFID Label voltage time delay, but no voltage derivative time delay. The second
case is when there is no RFID Label voltage time delay, but there is a voltage
derivative time delay. The third case is when both RFID Label voltage time delay
and voltage derivative time delay exist. For simplicity of our analysis we consider
the third case, two delays are the same (there is a difference but it is neglected in our
analysis). In each case we derive the related characteristic equation. The charac-
teristic equation is dependent on RFID Label overall parameters and interferences
time delay. Upon mathematics manipulation and [BK] theorems and definitions we
derive the expression which gives us a clear picture on RFID Label stability
map. The stability map gives all possible options for stability segments, each
segment belongs to different time delay value segment. RFID Label stability
analysis can be influenced either by TAG overall parameter values. We left this
analysis and do not discuss it in the current chapter.
Lemma 1.1 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive and real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0
Defined for s 2 I, this is continuous and differentiable. Assume further that if
k ¼ i  x, x 2 R, then Pn ði  x; sÞ þ Qn ði  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R hold true. Then the
functions Sn ðsÞ; n 2 N0 , are continuous and differentiable on I.
Theorem 1.2 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 defined for
s 2 I; I R þ 0 , and at some s 2 I, Sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for some n 2 N0 then a pair of
simple conjugate pure imaginary roots k þ ðs Þ ¼ i  xðs Þ; k ðs Þ ¼ i  xðs Þ of
Dðk; sÞ ¼ 0 exist at s ¼ s which crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if
dðs Þ [ 0 and cross the imaginary axis from right to left if dðs Þ\0 where

dRek dSn ðsÞ


dðs Þ ¼ signf jk¼ixðs Þ g ¼ signfFx ðxðs Þ; s Þg  signf j g
ds ds s¼s
n ðsÞ
The theorem becomes signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix
g ¼ signf
D
1=2
g  signfdSds js¼s g
Theorem 1.3 The characteristic equation: s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ bðsÞ  k  eks þ cðsÞ þ dðsÞ  eks ;


1 1
Dðk; s1 ; s2 Þ ¼ k2 þ k   eks2 þ  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
C1  R1 C1  f#

Has a pair of simple and conjugate pure imaginary roots k ¼


xðs Þ; xðs Þ
Real at s 2 I if Sn ðs Þ ¼ s  sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for some n 2 N0 . If xðs Þ ¼ x þ ðs Þ,
this pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary roots crosses the imaginary axis from
left to right if d þ ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from right to left if
dSn ðsÞ
d þ ðs Þ\0 where d þ ðs Þ ¼ signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix þ ðs Þ g ¼ signf ds js¼s g. If
44 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

xðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ, this pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary roots cross the
imaginary axis from left to right if d ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from
right to left If d ðs Þ\0 where d ðs Þ ¼ signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix ðs Þ g ¼
n ðsÞ
signfdSds js¼s g. If x þ ðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ ¼ xðs Þ then dðs Þ ¼ 0 and
signfdRek j
ds k¼ixðs Þ
0
g ¼ 0, the same is true when S ðs Þ ¼ 0. The following result can
n
be useful in identifying values of s where the stability switches happened.
Theorem 1.4 Assume that for all s 2 I, xðsÞ is defined as a solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼
0 then d
ðsÞ ¼ signf
D1=2 ðsÞg  signD
ðsÞ

D
ðsÞ ¼ x2
 ½ðx2
 b2 þ d 2 Þ þ a0  ðc  x2
Þ þ b  d 0  b0  d  a  c0 
þ x
 x0
 ½s  ðx2
 b2 þ d 2 Þ  b  d þ a  ðc  x2
Þ þ 2  x2
 a

daðsÞ 0 dbðsÞ 0 dcðsÞ 0 ddðsÞ


a0 ¼ ;b ¼ ;c ¼ ;d ¼
ds ds ds ds

1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas


Arranged as a Shifted Gate System for Stability
Optimization Under Delayed Electromagnetic
Interferences

A semi-passive tags operate similarly to passive RFID tags. However, they contain
a battery that enables long reading distance and also enables the tag to operate
independently of the reader. Semi-Passive TAGs with double loop antennas ar-
ranged as a shifted gate system influence by electromagnetic interferences which
effect there stability behavior. Semi-Passive RFID TAGs system with a battery is
like a Reader unit and aimed to improve the communication performance by using
double loop antennas in walk-through gate arrangement in various TAGs orienta-
tions of the RFID system operating mainly in the LF band. The below figure
describes the double loop antennas as a shifted gate in x-direction [8] (Fig. 1.19).
The antenna gate is shifted to avoid cancellation of magnetic fields between two
TAGs, and to improve the magnetic-field distribution. The RFID system at Low
Frequency (LF) band has been widely adopted. The RFID tags for this application
have usually installed in applications such that the orientation of tag id difficult to
fix for transferring data with RFID reader. Most of the LF-RFID reader antennas are
rectangular or circular loops, but these antennas cannot generate sufficient field
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 45

Fig. 1.19 Double loop D


antennas arranged as a shifted
gate in x-direction

d1

strengths in some locations and/or tag antenna orientations. The double loop
antennas arranged as a shifted gate improves magnetic-field distribution in a region
of interest suitable for communication with various tag orientations, and enhance
the communication distance [1]. The antenna gate is shifted to avoid cancellation of
magnetic fields between two gate antennas. The gate antenna consists of two sides
of rectangular loops with two types of excitations; i.e., in phase and 180° out of
phase. When two antennas are excited in phase, the directions of the currents
flowing in two loops are in the same direction, resulting in the cancellation of
magnetic fields in the x-direction in the middle region of the gate. When two
antennas are excited 180° out of phase, the direction of the currents flowing in two
antennas is in the opposite direction, resulting in the cancellation of magnetic fields
in the y-direction in the middle region of the gates. Thus, the gate antennas are
arranged as a shifted gate to maintain magnetic fields in the middle region. The
double loop antenna is employed due to the fact that this antenna consists of two
parallel loops (primary and secondary loops). The shape of the primary loop is
rectangular for generating the magnetic field in the y-direction. The secondary loop
is always within the primary loop, and is optimized such that the magnetic fields in
x- and z-directions are strongly generated. D is the separation distance between gate
antennas, and d1 is the shifted distance in the x-direction. Due to electromagnetic
interferences there are differences in time delays with respect to gate antenna’s first
and second loop voltages and voltages derivatives. The delayed voltages are
Vi1(t − s1) and Vi2(t − s2) respectively (s1 6¼ s2) and delayed voltages derivatives
are dVi1(t − D1)/dt, dVi2(t − D2)/dt respectively ðD1 6¼ D2 ; s1 0; s2 0;
D1 ; D2 0Þ. The Semi-Passive RFID TAG with double loop antennas equivalent
circuit can represent as a delayed differential equations which depending on vari-
able parameters and delays. Our Semi-Passive RFID TAG system delay differential
46 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

and delay different model can be analytically by using delay differential equations
in dynamically. The need of the incorporation of a time delay is often of the
existence of any stage structure. It is often difficult to analytically study models with
delay dependent parameters, even if only a single discrete delay is present. There
are practical guidelines that combine graphical information with analytical work to
effectively study the local stability of models involving delay dependent parame-
ters. The stability of a given steady state is simply determined by the graphs of
some function of s1, s2 which can be expressed, explicitly and thus can be easily
depicted by Matlab and other popular software. We need only look at one such
function and locate the zeros. This function often has only two zeros, providing
thresholds for stability switches. As time delay increases, stability changes from
stable to unstable to stable. We emphasize the local stability aspects of some models
with delay dependent parameters. Additionally, there is a general geometric crite-
rion that, theoretically speaking, can be applied to models with many delays, or
even distributed delays. The simplest case of a first order characteristic equation,
providing more user friendly geometric and analytic criteria for stability switches.
The analytical criteria provided for the first and second order cases can be used to
obtain some insightful analytical statements and can be helpful for conducting
simulations [5, 6]. Semi-Passive RFID TAG with double loop antenna can be
represented as a two inductors in series (L11 and L12 for the first double loop gate
antenna) with parasitic resistance rP1. The double loop antennas in series are con-
nected in parallel to Semi-Passive RFID TAG. The Equivalent Circuit of
Semi-Passive RFID TAG is Capacitor (C1) and Resistor (R1) in parallel with
voltage generator Vs1(t) and parasitic resistance rS1. In case we have Passive RFID
TAG switch S1 is OFF otherwise is ON (Reader/Active RFID system) and long
distance is achievable. The second double loop gate antenna is defined as two
inductors in series L21 and L22 with series parasitic resistor rP2. Vs2(t) and parasitic
resistance rS2 are belong to the second gate antenna system with another
Semi-Passive RFID TAG [1].
L11 and L12 are mostly formed by traces on planar PCB. 2  Lm element represents
the mutual inductance between L11 and L12. We consider that the double loop
antennas parameter values (La1, La2, Lb1, Lb2, a1, a2) are the same in the first and second
gates. Since two inductors (L11, L12) are in series and there is a mutual inductance
between L11 and L12, the total antenna inductance LT: LT = L11 + L12 + 2  Lm and
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lm ¼ K  L11  L12 . Lm is the mutual inductance between L11 and L12. K is the
coupling coefficient of two inductors 0 K 1. We start with the case of passive
RFID TAG which switch S1 is OFF. I(t) is the current that flow through a double loop
antenna. V11 and V12 are the voltages on L11 and L12 respectively. Vm is the voltage on
double loop antenna mutual inductance element.
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 47

dI dI dI
V11 ¼ L11  ; V12 ¼ L12  ; VCD ¼ I  rp1 ; Vm ¼ 2  Lm  ;
dt dt dt
dVC1
VAB ¼ VR1 ¼ VC1 ¼ V11 þ V12 þ VCD þ Vm ; IC1 ¼ C1 
dt
dVC1
VAB ¼ VR1 ¼ VC1 ¼ V11 þ V12 þ VCD þ Vm ; IC1 ¼ C1  ;
dt
dVC1 VC
IC1 þ IR1 þ I ¼ 0 ) C1  þ 1 þ I ¼ 0; L11 6¼ L12
dt R1

dVC1 dV11 dV12 dVCD dVm


¼ þ þ þ ;
dt Zdt dt dtZ dt
1 1
I¼  V11  dt ¼  V12  dt;
L11 L12
Z Z
rp1 rp1
VCD ¼ I  rp1 ¼  V11  dt ¼  V12  dt
L11 L12

dVCD rp1 rp1 L11 L12


¼  V11 þ  V12 ; V11 ¼  V12 ; V12 ¼  V11 ;
dt L11 L12 L12 L11
Z Z
1 1 dI 1 1
I¼  V11  dt ¼  V12  dt ) ¼  V11 ¼  V12
L11 L12 dt L11 L12
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dI pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 1 L12
¼ 2  K  L11  L12 
Vm ¼ 2  Lm   V11 ¼ 2  K   V11 ;
dt L11 L11
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVm L12 dV11
¼2K 
dt L11 dt

We get the following differential equation respect to V11(t) variable, g1 ; g2 ; g3


are global parameters.

d 2 V11 dV11
 g1 þ  g2 þ V11  g3 ¼ 0
dt2 dt rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
L12 L12
g1 ¼ C1  ð1 þ þ2 K  Þ;
L11 L11
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
C1  rp1 1 L12 L12
g2 ¼ þ  ð1 þ þ2  K  Þ;
L11 R1 L11 L11
C1  rp1 1 g1 1 rp1
g2 ¼ þ  ;g ¼  ð1 þ Þ
L11 R1 C1 3 L11 R1
g1 ¼ g1 ðC1 ; L12 ; L11 ; KÞ; g2 ¼ g2 ðC1 ; rp1 ; L12 ; L11 ; K; R1 Þ;
0
dV11 dV11
0 d 2 V11
g3 ¼ g3 ðL11 ; rp1 ; R1 Þ; V11 ¼ ; ¼
dt dt dt2
0
dV11 0 g g dV 11 0
¼ V11  2  V11  3 ; ¼ V11 :
dt g1 g1 dt
48 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

In the same manner we find our V12 differential equation. We get the following
differential equation respect to V12(t) variable, n1 ; n2 ; n3 are global parameters.
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d 2 V12 dV12 L11 L11
 n1 þ  n2 þ V12  n3 ¼ 0; n1 ¼ C1  ð1 þ þ2  K  Þ;
dt2 dt L12 L12
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
C1  rp1 1 L11 L11 1 rp1
n2 ¼ þ  ð1 þ þ2  K  Þ; n3 ¼  ð1 þ Þ
L12 R1 L12 L12 L12 R1
0
C1  rp1 1 n1 0 dV12 dV12 d 2 V12
n2 ¼ þ  ;V ¼ ; ¼ ;
L12 R1 C1 12 dt dt dt2
n1 ¼ n1 ðC1 ; L12 ; L11 ; KÞ; n2 ¼ n2 ðC1 ; rp1 ; L12 ; L11 ; K; R1 Þ
0
dV12 0 n n dV12 0
n3 ¼ n3 ðL12 ; rp1 ; R1 Þ; ¼ V12  2  V12  3 ; ¼ V12 :
dt n1 n1 dt

Summary: We get our RFID double loop antennas system’s four differential
equations.
0 0
dV11 0 g g dV11 0 dV12 0 n n dV12 0
¼ V11  2  V11  3 ; ¼ V11 ; ¼ V12  2  V12  3 ; ¼ V12
dt g1 g1 dt dt n1 n1 dt
0 dV 0 1
11 0 1 0 V0 1
B dt C C11 . . . C14 11
B dV11 C B C BV C g2 g3
B dt C B .. .. .. C B 11 C
B dV 0 C ¼ @ . . . AB C; C11 ¼  ; C12 ¼  ;
B 12 C @ V12 A
0 g1 g1
@ dt A
dV
C41    C44 V
12 12
dt
n2 n
C33 ¼  ; C34 ¼  3 ; C21 ¼ C43 ¼ 1
n1 n1

C13 ¼ C14 ¼ C22 ¼ C23 ¼ C24 ¼ C31 ¼ C32 ¼ C41 ¼ C42 ¼ C44 ¼ 0

The RFID double loop antennas system’s primary and secondary loops are
composed of a thin wire or a thin plate element (Fig. 1.20). Units are all in cm, and
a1, a2 are radiuses of the primary and secondary wires in cm. There inductances can
be calculated by the following formulas (Fig. 1.21):

2  A1 2  A1
L11 ¼ 4  fLb1  ln½  þ La1  ln½  þ 2  ½a1 þ lc1
a1  ðLb1 þ lc1 Þ a1  ðLb1 þ lc1 Þ
 ðLa1 þ Lb1 Þg
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 49

Fig. 1.20 Double loop


La1
antennas in series with
parasitic resistance and
Semi-Passive RFID TAG La2

2a1
2a2 Lb2 Lb1

Semi-Active
RFID / Reader

Fig. 1.21 Equivalent circuit


of double loop antennas in
series with Semi-
Passive RFID TAG
50 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

2  A2 2  A2
L12 ¼ 4  fLb2  ln½  þ La2  ln½  þ 2  ½a2 þ lc2
a2  ðLb2 þ lc2 Þ a2  ðLb2 þ lc2 Þ
 ðLa2 þ Lb2 Þg
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lc1 ¼ L2a1 þ L2b1 ; A1 ¼ La1  Lb1 ; lc2 ¼ L2a2 þ L2b2 ; A2 ¼ La2  Lb2

Due to electromagnetic interferences, we get a shifted gate RFID system’s pri-


mary and secondary antennas loops voltages with delays s1 and s2 respectively.
Additionally, we get antennas loop voltages derivatives with delays D1 and D2
0 0
respectively. V11 ðtÞ ! V11 ðt  s1 Þ; V12 ðtÞ ! V12 ðt  s2 Þ; V11 ðtÞ ! V11 ðt  D1 Þ
0 0 dV 0 dV 0
V12 ðtÞ ! V12 ðt  D2 Þ. We consider no delay effect on dVdt11 ; dVdt12 ; dt11 ; dt12 .
The RFID shifted gate system, differential equations under electromagnetic
interferences (delays terms) influence only RFID double loop voltages V11(t),
0 0
V12(t) and voltages derivatives V11 ðtÞ and V12 ðtÞ respect to time, there is no
0 0
dV11 ðtÞ dV12 ðtÞ dV11 ðtÞ dV12 ðtÞ
influence on dt ; dt ; dt ; dt .
0 0 1
dV11
B dt C 0 0 1
B C
B dV11 C 0 1 V11 ðt  D1 Þ
B C C11 . . . C14 B C
B dt C B . .. .. C B V11 ðt  s1 Þ C
B C
B dV 0 C ¼ @ .. . . A  B 0
@ V12
C
ðt  D2 Þ A
B 12 C
B C C41    C44
B dt C V12 ðt  s2 Þ
@ dV A
12
dt

To find equilibrium points (fixed points) of the RFID shifted gate system is by

lim V11 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ V11 ðtÞ; lim V12 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ V12 ðtÞ;


t!1 t!1
0 0 0 0
lim V11 ðt  D1 Þ ¼ V11 ðtÞ; lim V12 ðt  D2 Þ ¼ V12 ðtÞ
t!1 t!1
dV11 ðtÞ dV12 ðtÞ dV 0 ðtÞ dV 0 ðtÞ
¼ 0; ¼ 0; 11 ¼ 0; 12 ¼ 0: 8 t  s1 ; t  s2 ; t  D1 ; t  D2
dt dt dt dt
9 ðt  s1 Þ  t; ðt  s2 Þ  t; ðt  D1 Þ  t; ðt  D2 Þ  t; t ! 1:

0 ð0Þ ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ ð0Þ


We get four equations and the only fixed point is E ð0Þ ðV11 ; V11 ; V12 ; V12 Þ ¼
ð0; 0; 0; 0Þ since

g3 6¼ 0 & g1 6¼ 0 ) C12 6¼ 0; n3 6¼ 0 & n1 6¼ 0 ) C34 6¼ 0


1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 51

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of RFID shifted gate system consists in adding to coordinate
0 0
½V11 V11 V12 V12  arbitrarily small increments of exponential form½v011 v11 v012 v12  ekt ,
0 0
and retaining the first order terms in V11 V11 V12 V12 . The system of four homogeneous
equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues k. The
polynomial characteristic equations accept by set the below voltages and voltages
derivative respect to time into two RFID shifted gate system equations.
RFID shifted gate system fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of
exponential form ½v011 v11 v012 v12   ekt are: i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second
fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,

0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v011  ekt ; V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v11  ekt
0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v012  ekt ; V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v12  ekt

0 0
We choose the above expressions for our V11 ðtÞ; V11 ðtÞ and V12 ðtÞ; V12 ðtÞ as
0 0
small displacement ½v11 v11 v12 v12  from the system fixed points in time t = 0.

0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v011 ; V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v11
0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v012 ; V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v12

For k\0; t [ 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k [ 0; t [ 0 is


Unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially to k\0; t [ 0
otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the eigenvalue
parameter which establishes if the fixed point is stable or Unstable, additionally his
absolute value (jkj) establish the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point [2, 3].

k<0 k>0
0 0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
t=0 V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v011 0
V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v011
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v11 V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v11
0 0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v012 0
V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v012
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v12 V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v12
0 0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
t>0 V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v011  ejkjt 0
V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v011  ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v11  ejkjt V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v11  ejkjt
0 0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v012  ejkjt 0
V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v012  ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v12  ejkjt V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v12  ejkjt
(continued)
52 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

(continued)
k<0 k>0
0ðiÞ 0
t>0 0
V11 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ V11 V11 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  v011  ejkjt
t!∞
V11 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
ðiÞ
V11 V11 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  v11  ejkjt
0
0
V12 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
0ðiÞ
V12 V12 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  v012  ejkjt

V12 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
ðiÞ
V12 V12 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  v11  ejkjt

The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for RFID
shifted gate system voltages and voltages derivatives respect to time are

0 0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
dV11 ðtÞ V 0 ðt þ DtÞ  V11 0
ðtÞ V þ v011  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½V11 þ v011  ekt 
¼ lim 11 ¼ lim 11
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
v011  ekt  ½ekDt  1
¼ lim ! ekDt  1 þ k  Dtk  v011  ekt
Dt!0 Dt
dV11 ðtÞ dV12 ðtÞ
¼ k  v11  ekt ; ¼ k  v12  ekt ;
dt dt
0
dV12 ðtÞ dV 0 ðt  D1 Þ
¼ k  v012  ekt ; 11 ¼ k  v011  ekt  ekD1
dt dt

0
dV11 ðt  D1 Þ dV11 ðt  s1 Þ
¼ k  v011  ekt  ekD1 ; ¼ k  v11  ekt  eks1
dt dt
dV12 ðt  s2 Þ dV 0 ðt  D2 Þ
¼ k  v12  ekt  eks2 ; 12 ¼ k  v012  ekt  ekD2
dt dt

First, we take the RFID shifted gate voltages V11, V12 differential equations:
0 dV12 0 0 0
dV11
dt ¼ V11 ; dt ¼ V12 and adding coordinates ½V11 V11 V12 V12  arbitrarily small
0 0 kt
increments of exponential terms ½v11 v11 v12 v12   e and retaining the first order
terms in v011 v11 v012 v12 .
0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
k  v11  ekt ¼ V11 þ v011  ekt ; V11 ¼ 0; k  v11 ¼ v011 ) k  v11 þ v011 ¼ 0
0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
k  v12  ekt ¼ V12 þ v012  ekt ; V12 ¼ 0; k  v12 ¼ v012 ) k  v12 þ v012 ¼ 0
0 0
Second, we take the RFID shifted gate’s voltages derivative V11 ; V12 differential
equations:
0
dV11 0 dV 0 0
¼ C11  V11 þ C12  V11 ; 12 ¼ C33  V12 þ C34  V12
dt dt
0 0
And adding coordinates ½V11 V11 V12 V12  arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential terms ½v11 v11 v12 v12   e and retaining the first order terms in v011 v11 v012 v12 .
0 0 kt
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 53

0 0
0 ðiÞ 0 ðiÞ ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ
k  v11  ekt ¼ C11  ½V11 þ v11  ekt  þ C12  ½V11 þ v11  ekt  ; V11 ¼ 0 ; V11 ¼0
0 0 0 0
k  v11 ¼ C11  v11 þ C12  v11 ) k  v11 þ C11  v11 þ C12  v11 ¼ 0
0 0
0 ðiÞ 0 ðiÞ ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ
k  v12  ekt ¼ C33  ½V12 þ v12  ekt  þ C34  ½V12 þ v12  ekt  ; V12 ¼ 0 ; V12 ¼0

0 0 0 0
k  v12 ¼ C33  v12 þ C34  v12 ) k  v12 þ C33  v12 þ C34  v12 ¼ 0
0
We can summery our eigenvalues equations: ðk þ C11 Þ  v11 þ C12  v11 ¼ 0
0 0 0
v11  k  v11 ¼ 0 ; (  k þ C33 Þ  v12 þ C34  v12 ¼ 0 ; v12  k  v12 ¼ 0
0 0 1
0 1 v11
X11 ... X14 B C
B . B v11 C
B . .. .. C
C B C
@ . . . AB
B v0 C
C ¼ 0 ; X11 ¼ k þ C11 ; X12 ¼ C12 ; X13 ¼ 0 ; X14 ¼ 0
@ 12 A
X41  X44
v12

X21 ¼ 1 ; X22 ¼ k ; X23 ¼ 0 ; X24 ¼ 0 ; X31 ¼ 0 ; X32 ¼ 0 ; X33 ¼ k þ C33 ; X34 ¼ C34

X41 ¼ 0 ; X42 ¼ 0 ; X43 ¼ 1 ; X44 ¼ k


0 1
X11 . . . X14
B . .. .. C
A  k  I ¼ @ .. . . A ; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0
X41    X44
0 1 0 1
k 0 0 1 0 0
B C B C
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ ðk þ C11 Þ  det@ 0 k þ C33 C34 A  C12  det@ 0 k þ C33 C34 A
0 1 k 0 1 k
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ ðk þ C11 Þ  ðkÞ  ½ðk þ C33 Þ  ðkÞ  C34   C12  ½ðk þ C33 Þ  ðkÞ  C34 
k4  k3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ k2  ðC11  C33  C34  C12 Þ þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33 Þ þ C12  C34 ¼ 0

Eigenvalues stability discussion: Our Semi-passive RFID tags with double loop
antenna system involving N variables ðN [ 2; N ¼ 4Þ, the characteristic equation is
of degree N ¼ 4 and must often be solved numerically. Expect in some particular
cases, such an equation has (N ¼ 4) distinct roots that can be real or complex.
These values are the eigenvalues of the 4  4 Jacobian matrix (A). The general rule
54 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

is that the Steady State (SS) is stable if there is no eigenvalue with positive real
part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is positive for the steady state to be unstable.
0 0
Our 4-variables (V11 ; V11 ; V12 ; V12 ) system has four eigenvalues. The type of
behavior can be characterized as a function of the position of these eigenvalues in
the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be distinguished: (1) the four
eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), (2) the four eigenvalues are
real, three of them are negative (unstable steady state), (3) and (4) two eigenvalues
are complex conjugates with a negative real part and the other eigenvalues are real
negative (stable steady state), two cases can be distinguished depending on the
relative value of the real part of the complex eigenvalues and of the real one,
(5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and other
eigenvalues real are positive (unstable steady state) [2–4].
We define

0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V11 ðt  D1 Þ ¼ V11 þ v011  ekðtD1 Þ ; V11 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ V11 þ v11  ekðts1 Þ
0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V12 ðt  D2 Þ ¼ V12 þ v012  ekðtD2 Þ ; V12 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ V12 þ v12  ekðts2 Þ

Then we get four delayed differential equations with respect to coordinates


0 0
½V11 V11 V12 V12  arbitrarily small increments of exponential ½v011 v11 v012 v12   ekt .

k  ekt  v011 ¼ C11  ekðtD1 Þ  v011 þ C12  ekðts1 Þ  v11 ; k  ekt  v11 ¼ ekðtD1 Þ  v011
k  ekt  v012 ¼ C33  ekðtD2 Þ  v012 þ C34  ekðts2 Þ  v12 ; k  ekt  v12 ¼ ekðtD2 Þ  v012

0 ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ 0 ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ


In the equilibrium fixed point V11 ¼ 0; V11 ¼ 0,V12 ¼ 0; V12 ¼ 0.
The small increments Jacobian of our RFID shifted gate system is as bellow:

 11 ¼ k þ C11  ekD1 ;  12 ¼ C12  eks1 ;  13 ¼ 0;  14 ¼ 0;


 21 ¼ ekD1 ;  22 ¼ k;  23 ¼ 0;  24 ¼ 0;  31 ¼ 0;  32 ¼ 0

!33 ¼ k þ C33  ekD2 ; !34 ¼ C34  eks2 ; !41 ¼ 0; !42 ¼ 0;


0 0 1
0 1 v11
!11 . . . !14 B C
B . . . C B B v11 CC
B . .. .. C C ¼ 0; !43 ¼ ekD2 ; !44 ¼ k
@ . AB B v0 C
@ 12 A
!41    !44
v12
0 1
!11 . . . !14
B . .. .. C
AkI ¼B @ .. .
C
. A; det jA  k  Ij ¼ 0
!41    !44
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 55

P
2 P
2
k½ si þ Dj 
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k þ C12  C34  e
4 i¼1 j¼1

P
2 P
2
k½s2 þ Dj  k½s1 þ Dj 
þ k  fC11  C34  e j¼1
þ C33  C12  e j¼1
g
P
2
k Dj
kðD2 þ s2 Þ kðD1 þ s1 Þ
þ k  fC34  e
2
 C12  e þ C11  C33  e j¼1
g
 k3  fC33  ekD2 þ C11  ekD1 g

We have three stability cases: s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s & D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼ s2 ¼


0 & D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D or s1 ¼ s2 ¼ D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD otherwise s1 6¼ s2 & D1 6¼ D2 and
they are positive parameters. There are other possible simple stability cases: s1 ¼
s; s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0. s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼
D; D2 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ D. We need to get characteristics equa-
tions for all above stability analysis cases. We study the occurrence of any possible
stability switching, resulting from the increase the value of the time delays s; D; sD
for the general characteristic equation Dðk; s=D=sD Þ. If we choose s parameter, then
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks . The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ; Pn ðk; sÞ ¼
P n
Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k þ P3 ðsÞ  k þ . . .:
k 2 3
k¼0
P
m
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ
k¼0
q2 ðsÞ  k2 þ . . .:
First, we discuss RFID shifted gate system fourth order characteristic equation
for s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0. The first case we analyze is when there is a delay
in RFID first gate’s primary loop antenna voltage and no delay in secondary loop
antenna voltage. Additionally, there is no delay in the gate’s primary and secondary
loop antennas voltages derivatives [5, 6]. The general characteristic equation D(k,
s) is ad follow:

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k  C11  C34 þ k2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þ  k3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ


þ k4 þ fC12  C34 þ k  C33  C12  k2  C12 g  eks
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 2; n [ m:

The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is

X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k þ P3 ðsÞ  k
k 2 3

k¼0

þ P4 ðsÞ  k4 ¼ k  C11  C34 þ k2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þ  k3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ k4


P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P1 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C34 ; P2 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C33  C34 ; P3 ðsÞ ¼ ðC33 þ C11 Þ; P4 ðsÞ ¼ 1
56 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is


X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 ¼ C12  C34 þ k  C33  C12  k2  C12
k¼0
q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12  C34 ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ C33  C12 ; q2 ðsÞ ¼ C12

0 0
The homogeneous system for V11 V11 V12 V12 leads to a characteristic equation
for the eigenvalue k having the form PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼
P4 P
2
aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j
j¼0 j¼0
And the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk Þ; cj ðqi ; qk Þg 2 R depend on qi ; qk , but not on s.
qi ; qk are any two shifted gate system’s parameters, other parameters keep as a
constant. a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ C11  C34 ; a2 ¼ C11  C33  C34 ; a3 ¼ ðC33 þ C11 Þ; a4 ¼ 1
c0 ¼ C12  C34 ; c1 ¼ C33  C12 ; c2 ¼ C12 . Unless strictly necessary, the designa-
tion of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj.
The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their argu-
ments, and direct substitution shows that a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e.
k = 0 is not a of PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0. Furthermore, P(k), Q(k) are analytic
functions of k, for which the following requirements of the analysis [BK] can also
be verified in the present case:
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R, then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 Has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of F(x) = 0 is continuous and differentiable re-
spect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðkÞ. It can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is, for any real number x;

pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0;
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ i  x  C11  C34 þ i  x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ  x2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þ þ x4
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ i  x  C33  C12 þ C12  C34 þ x2  C12
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C34 þ x2  ½C12  C11  C33 þ C34  þ x4
þ i  x  ½C33  C12 þ C11  C34  þ i  x3  ½C33 þ C11  6¼ 0

jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x2  C211  C234 þ x4  f2  C11  C34  ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ ðC11  C33  C34 Þ2 g
þ x6  fðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þg þ x8
jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ C212  C234 þ x2  C212  ð2  C34 þ C233 Þ þ x4  C212
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ C212  C234 þ x2  fC211  C234  C212  ð2  C34 þ C233 Þg
þ x4  f2  C11  C34  ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ ðC11  C33  C34 Þ2  C212 g
þ x6  fðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þg þ x8
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 57

We define the following parameters for simplicity:

N0 ¼ C212  C234 ; N2 ¼ C211  C234  C212  ð2  C34 þ C233 Þ;


N4 ¼ 2  C11  C34  ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ ðC11  C33  C34 Þ2  C212
N6 ¼ ðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þ; N8 ¼ 1
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ N0 þ N2  x2
X
4
þ N4  x4 þ N6  x6 þ N8  x8 ¼ N2k  x2k
k¼0

P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies N2k  x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þ þ x4

PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þ þ x4


PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  fC11  C34 þ x2  ðC33 þ C11 Þg;
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C34 þ x2  C12 ; QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  C33  C12

Hence

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2

fC11  C33  C34  x2 g  x3  C33  C12


þ x  fC11  C34 þ x2  ðC33 þ C11 Þg  fC12  C34 þ x2  C12 g
sin hðsÞ ¼
C212  C234 þ x2  C212  ð2  C34 þ C233 Þ þ x4  C212

x2  fC34  C11  C33 þ x2 g  fC12  C34 þ x2  C12 g


þ x2  fC11  C34 þ x2  ðC33 þ C11 Þg  C33  C12
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
C212  C234 þ x2  C212  ð2  C34 þ C233 Þ þ x4  C212

P
4
Which jointly with Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 ) N2k  x2k ¼ 0 that is continuous and
k¼0
differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use theorem 1.2. This proves the
theorem 1.3. Remark: RFID shifted gate system parameters are independent of the
delay parameter s.
Second, we discuss RFID shifted gate system fourth order characteristic equation
for s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s & D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0. The second case we analyze is when there is a
58 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

delay in RFID gate’s primary and secondary loop antenna voltages (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s)
and no delay in the gate’s primary and secondary loop antennas voltages derivatives
[5, 6]. The general characteristic equation D(k, s) is ad follow:

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k4  k3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ k2  C11  C33


þ fC12  C34  eks þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33 Þ  k2  ðC34 þ C12 Þg  eks

Under Taylor series approximation: eks  1  k  s þ 12  k2  s2 . The


Maclaurin series is a Taylor series expansion of a eks function about zero (0). We
get the following general characteristic equation D(k, s) under Taylor series
approximation:

1 2 2
eks  1  k  s þ k s :
2
Dðk; sÞ ¼ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11  þ k2  C11  C33
þ fC12  C34 þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
1
þ k2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g  eks
2
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 2; n [ m:

The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is

X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k
k 2

k¼0

þ P3 ðsÞ  k3 þ P4 ðsÞ  k4 ¼ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11  þ k2  C11  C33


P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0 ; P2 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C33 ; P3 ðsÞ ¼ ½C33 þ C11  ; P4 ðsÞ ¼ 1:

P
m
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ
k¼0
q2 ðsÞ  k2

X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2
k¼0
Xm
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ C12  C34 þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
k¼0
1
þ k2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 ; q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12  C34
2
1
q1 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s; q2 ðsÞ ¼  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 59

0 0
The homogeneous system for V11 V11 V12 V12 leads to a characteristic equation
for the eigenvalue k having the form
X
4 X
2
Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j
j¼0 j¼0

And the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on qi ; qk and delay
s. qi ; qk are any two shifted gate system’s parameters, other parameters keep as a
constant.
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ C11  C33 ; a3 ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; a4 ¼ 1
c0 ¼ C12  C34 ; c1 ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s;
1
c2 ¼  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e. k = 0 is not a of Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0.
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That is,
for any real number x:
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ
¼ x4 þ i  x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ  x2  C11  C33

Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C34 þ i  x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s


1
 x2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 
2
1
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x  x2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 þ C11  C33 
4
2
þ C12  C34 þ i  x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ i  x  ½C11  C34
þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 6¼ 0; jPði  x; sÞj2
¼ x8 þ x6  fðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  C11  C33 g þ x4  C211  C233

jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ C212  C234 þ x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s2
1
 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g
2
1
þ x4  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2
2
60 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

We need to find the expression for Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2 jQði  x; sÞj2

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  fðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  C11  C33 g


1
þ x4  fC211  C233  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2 g
2
 x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s2
1
 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g  C212  C234
2

We define the following parameters for simplicity:

N0 ¼ C212  C234 ; N2 ¼ ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s2


1
þ 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 
2
1
N4 ¼ C211  C233  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2 ;
2
2
N6 ¼ ðC33 þ C11 Þ  2  C11  C33 ; N8 ¼ 1
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2
X
4
¼ N0 þ N2  x2 þ N4  x4 þ N6  x6 þ N8  x8 ¼ N2k  x2k
k¼0

P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies N2k  x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  C11  C33

PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  C11  C33
P1 ði  x; sÞ ¼ x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ
1
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C34  x2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 ;
2
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s

Hence
PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2
PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 61

 fx4  x2  C11  C33 g  x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s


1
þ x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ  fC12  C34  x2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g
sin hðsÞ ¼ 2
C212  C234 þ x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s2
1
 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g
2
1
þ x4  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2
2

1
fx4  x2  C11  C33 g  fC12  C34  x2  ½  C12  C34  s2
2
 C34  C12  g þ x4  ðC33 þ C11 Þ  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33
 C12  C34  s
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
C212  C234 þ x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s2
1
 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g
2
1
þ x4  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2
2

That is a continuous and differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use


theorem 1.2. This proves the theorem 1.3. Third, we discuss RFID shifted gate
system fourth order characteristic equation for s1 ¼ s2 ¼ D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD . The third
case we analyze is when there is a delay in RFID gate’s primary and secondary loop
antenna voltages (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD ) and delay in the gate’s primary and
secondary loop antennas voltages derivatives [5, 6]. The general characteristic
equation D(k, s) is as follows:
Dðk; sD Þ ¼ k4 þ fC12  C34  ek3sD þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33 Þ  ek2sD
þ k2  ðC34 þ C11  C33  C12 Þ  eksD  k3  ðC33 þ C11 Þg  eksD

The Maclaurin series is a Taylor series expansion of eks ; e2ks ; e3ks func-
tions about zero (0). We get the following general characteristic equation D(k, s)
under Taylor series approximation:

eks  1  k  s; ek2s  1  k  2  s
ek3s  1  k  3  s

.
62 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Dðk; sD Þ ¼ k4 þ fC12  C34 þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ


þ k2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þ
þ k3  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þg  eksD

Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 3; n [ m:

The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ being

X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k þ P3 ðsÞ  k
k 2 3

k¼0

þ P4 ðsÞ  k4 ¼ k4
P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0 ; P2 ðsÞ ¼ 0 ; P3 ðsÞ ¼ 0 ; P4 ðsÞ ¼ 1

The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ being

X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 þ q3 ðsÞ  k3
k¼0
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ C12  C34 þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
þ k2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þ
þ k3  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þ
q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12  C34 ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD ;
q2 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD
q3 ðsÞ ¼ ½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11

0 0
A homogeneous system for V11 V11 V12 V12 leads to a characteristic equation for
P4
the eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ aj 
j¼0
P
3
k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j and the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on
j¼0
qi ; qk and delay s. qi ; qk are any two shifted gate system’s parameters, other
parameters kept as a constant.

a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ 0; a3 ¼ 0; a4 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ C12  C34 ;
c1 ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD
c0 ¼ C12  C34 ; c1 ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD ;
c2 ¼ C11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD
c3 ¼ ½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 :
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 63

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e.
k = 0 is not a Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0. We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and
Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That is, for any real number x:

pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0

pn ðk ¼ ix; sÞ ¼ x4 ; Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼
C12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þ
þ i  x  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 i  x3  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þ
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼
C12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þ
þ x4 þ i  x  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 i  x3  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þ 6¼ 0; jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8

jQm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞj2 ¼ C212  C234 þ x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2
 2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þg
þ x4  fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þ2
 2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ  ð½C34  C11  C33
þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þg
þ x6  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þ2

We need to find the expression for Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8  x6  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þ2
 x4  fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þ2
 2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þg
 x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2
 2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þg  C212  C234
64 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

We define the following parameters for simplicity:

N0 ¼ C212  C234 ; N2 ¼ fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2


 2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þg
N4 ¼ fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þ2
 2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þg
N6 ¼ ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þ2 ; N8 ¼ 1
X
4
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ N0 þ N2  x2 þ N4  x4 þ N6  x6 þ N8  x8 ¼ N2k  x2k
k¼0

P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies N2k  x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. Furthermore

PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4 ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ 0
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þ
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 x2  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þg

Hence

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2

 x5  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ


 x2  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þg
sin hðsÞ ¼
C212  C234 þ x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2
 2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33 
 2  sD Þg þ x4  fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34
þ C12  C33   2  sD Þ2  2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þg þ x6  ð½C34  C11  C33
þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þ2
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 65

x4  fC12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þg
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
C212  C234 þ x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2
 2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þg
þ x4  fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33   2  sD Þ2  2  ðC11  C34
þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þg
þ x6  ð½C34  C11  C33 þ C12   sD  C33  C11 Þ2

It is continuous and differentiable in sD based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use


theorem 1.2. This proves the theorem 1.3. Next we analyze RFID shifted gate
system stability analysis under delayed variables in time. Our RFID shifted gate
homogeneous system for v011 v11 v012 v12 leads to a characteristic equation for the
eigenvalue k having the form PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0; Second case s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s;
D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0.

Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4  k3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ k2  C11  C33


þ fC12  C34  eks þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33 Þ  k2  ðC34 þ C12 Þg  eks

Under Taylor series approximation: eks  1  k  s þ 12  k2  s2 . The


Maclaurin series is a Taylor series expansion of a eks function about zero (0). We
get the following general characteristic equation D(k, s) under Taylor series
approximation: eks  1  k  s þ 12  k2  s2 .

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11  þ k2  C11  C33 þ fC12  C34


1
þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s þ k2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g  eks
2

We use different parameters terminology from our last characteristics parameters


definition: k ! j; pk ðsÞ ! aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 2; n [ m
P4
Additionally Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! QðkÞ then PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j ;
j¼0
P
2
QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j
j¼0

Pk ¼ k  k  ½C33 þ C11  þ k  C11  C33 ;


4 3 2

Qk ¼ C12  C34 þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s


1
þ k2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 
2

n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m and aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable func-


tion of s such that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0. In the following “—” denotes complex and con-
jugate. PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s. The coefficients
66 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

faj ðC1 ; R1 ; gate antenna parametrsÞ and cj ðC1 ; R1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs Þg 2 R
depend on RFID shifted gate system’s C1, R1,s values and antenna parameters.
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ C11  C33 ; a3 ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; a4 ¼ 1
c0 ¼ C12  C34 ; c1 ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s;
1
c2 ¼  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments
ðR1 ; C1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs) will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj.
The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their argu-
ments, and direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; C12  C34 6¼ 0.
r
g3  n3  ð1 þ Rp11 Þ2
1
L11 L12
¼ rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 6¼ 0
g1  n1 L12 L12 L11
C12  ð1 þ þ2  K  Þ  ð1 þ
L11 L11 L12
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
L11
þ2 K  Þ
L12
8 C1 ; gate antenna parameters 2 R þ

i.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root of the characteristic equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; QðkÞ are
analytic functions of k for which the following requirements of the analysis (see
Kuang 1993, Sect. 3.4) can also be verified in the present case [5, 6].
(a) If k ¼ i  x, x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0, i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
ðR1 ; C1 ; antenna parametrs) domain of interest.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
Indeed, in the limit.

QðkÞ fC12  C34 þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s þ k2  ½12  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g
j j¼j j
PðkÞ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11  þ k2  C11  C33

(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2


Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  fðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  C11  C33 g
1
þ x4  fC211  C233  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2 g
2
 x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s2
1
 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g  C212  C234
2
Has at most a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x (Degree
in x8 ).
(d) Each positive root xðR1 ; C1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs) of FðxÞ ¼ 0 being
continuous and differentiable with respect to R1 ; C1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs.
This condition can only be assessed numerically.
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 67

In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have


Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ thus k ¼ i  x, x [ 0 maybe on
eigenvalue of characteristic equations. The analysis consists in identifying the roots
of the characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane,
whereby increasing the parameters R1 ; C1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs, Rek may, at
the crossing, Change its sign from (−) to (+), i.e. from a stable focus
0 ð0Þ ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ ð0Þ
E ð0Þ ðV11 ; V11 ; V12 ; V12 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0Þ to an unstable one, or vice versa. This
feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with
respect to C1 ; R1 ; s and gate antenna parameters.

@Rek
^1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; R1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs ¼ const
@C1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðR1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs ¼ const
@R1 k¼ix
@Rek @Rek
^1 ðL11 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; s ¼ const; ^1 ðL12 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; s ¼ const
@L11 k¼ix @L12 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; gate antenna parametrs ¼ const; where x 2 R þ :
@s k¼ix

In the case s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 we get the following results:

PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  C11  C33 ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ;


1
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C34  x2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 
2
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s

N0 ¼ C212  C234 ; N2 ¼ ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s2


1
þ 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 
2
1
N4 ¼ C11  C33  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2 ;
2 2
2
N6 ¼ ðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  C11  C33 ; N8 ¼ 1

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ N0 þ N2  x2


X
4
þ N4  x4 þ N6  x6 þ N8  x8 ¼ N2k  x2k
k¼0

P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies N2k  x2k ¼ 0 When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i 
k¼0
PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼ i  x Into RFID Gate sys-
tem’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:
68 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin x  s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos x  s ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

Where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above sin x  s and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and
adding the sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note that FðxÞ is dependent of s. Now it is important to notice that if s 62 I (assume
that I R þ 0 is the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for s 62 I ,xðsÞ is
not defined. Then for all s in I xðsÞ is satisfied that Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0). Then there are no
positive xðsÞ solutions for Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have stability switches. For
any s 2 I where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, we can define the angle
hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by

hðsÞ þ n  2  p
sn ðsÞ ¼ ; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I
xðsÞ

Let us introduce the functions I ! R ; Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 (187)


That is a continuous and differentiable in s. In the following, the subscripts
k; x; R1 ; C1 and RFID Gate antenna parameters ðLa1 ; La2 ; Lb1 ; Lb2 ; a1 ; a2 Þ indicate
the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on ^ðxÞ remembering
in kðLa1 ; La2 ; Lb1 ; Lb2 ; a1 ; a2 Þ and xðLa1 ; La2 ; Lb1 ; Lb2 ; a1 ; a2 Þ, and keeping all
parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in reference
[BK]. Differentiating RFID characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0 with
respect to specific parameter (x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one
calculates:
Remark

x ¼ R1 ; C1 ; La1 ; La2 ; Lb1 ; Lb2 ; a1 ; a2 ; etc:;

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 69

Where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . .: etc., Substituting k ¼ i  x, and bearing i
Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ and
i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ. That on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains

@k 1 i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þ jk¼ix ¼ ð Þ
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with

P ¼ PR þ i  PI ; Q ¼ QR þ i  QI ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx
Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx
Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I

When (x) can be any RFID Gate parameters R1, C1, And time delay s etc. Where
for convenience, we have dropped the arguments ði  x; xÞ, and where

Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ


Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ; xx ¼ Fx =Fx :

We define U and V:
U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ;
V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = s.

PRx ¼ 2  x  ½2  x2  C11  C33 ; PIx ¼ 3  x2  ðC33 þ C11 Þ;


PRs ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0; QRs ¼ x2  C12  C34  s; QIs ¼ x  C12  C34
PRs ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0; QRs ¼ x2  C12  C34  s; QIs ¼ x  C12  C34 ;
PRx  PR ¼ 2  x3  ½2  x4  3  x2  C11  C33 þ C211  C233 
PIx  PI ¼ 3  x5  ðC33 þ C11 Þ2 ; xs ¼ Fs =Fx ;
1
QRx ¼ 2  x  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 
2
QIx ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
1
QRx  QR ¼ 2  x  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12   ½C12  C34
2
1
 x  ð  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 Þ
2
2
QIx  QI ¼ x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s2 ;
Fs ¼ 2  ½ðPRs  PR þ PIs  PI Þ  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þ
70 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

1
Fs ¼ 2  x2  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  s  x2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 Þ
2
PR  PIx ¼ 3  x4  ðx2  C11  C33 Þ  ðC33 þ C11 Þ;
PI  PRx ¼ 2  x4  ðC33 þ C11 Þ  ð2  x2  C11  C33 Þ
1
QR  QIx ¼ ½C12  C34  x2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 Þ
2
 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
QI  QRx ¼ 2  x2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ
1
 ð  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 Þ
2
V ¼ ðPR  PIs  PI  PRs Þ  ðQR  QIs  QI  QRs Þ;
PR  PIs ¼ 0; PI  PRs ¼ 0
1
QR  QIs ¼ x  C12  C34  ½C12  C34  x2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 Þ;
2
QI  QRs ¼ x3  C12  C34  s  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0:

Differentiating with respect to s and we get

@x @x Fs @Rek
Fx  þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) ¼  ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s @s Fx @s k¼ix
2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx @x Fs
^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g; ¼ xs ¼ 
Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj  @s
2 Fx
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@s k¼ix
@x U  @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  signfs  þxþ g
@s jPj2

We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcations)


in a shifted gate, double loop RFID system, about the equilibrium point
0 ð0Þ ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ ð0Þ
E ð0Þ ðV11 ; V11 ; V12 ; V12 Þ as a result of a variation of delay parameter s. The
analysis consists in identifying the roots of our system characteristic equation sit-
uated on the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane, Whereby increasing the delay
parameter s, Re k may at the crossing, changes its sign from − to +, i.e. from a
stable focus E(*) to an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature may be further
assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with respect to s,
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k
@s Þk¼ix

@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; gate antenna parametrs ¼ const where x 2 R þ :
@s k¼ix
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 71

For our stability switching analysis, we choose typical RFID shifted gate parameters
values: L11 = 4.5 mH, L12 = 2.5 mH, C1 = 23 pF, R1 = 100 kX = 105, rp1 = 100 X,
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
K = 0.6, 2Lm = 0.004 (2  Lm ¼ 2  K  L11  L12 ). g1 ¼ 56:22  1012

g2 ¼ 2:49  105 ; g3 ¼ 222:42; n1 ¼ 101:2  1012 ; n2 ¼ 4:492  105


g g
n3 ¼ 400:4; C11 ¼  2 ¼  4:42  105 ; C12 ¼  3 ¼ 3:95  1012 ;
g1 g1
n2 n 3
C33 ¼  ¼  4:43  105 ; C34 ¼  ¼  3:95  1012 :
n1 n1
C21 ¼ C43 ¼ 1; C13 ¼ C14 ¼ C22 ¼ C23 ¼ C24 ¼ 0;
C31 ¼ C32 ¼ C41 ¼ C42 ¼ C44 ¼ 0

Then we get the expression Fðx; sÞ for a typical RFID shifted gate parameters
values.

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  39:16  1010


þ x4  f383:17  1020  ½7:8  1024  s2 þ 7:9  1012 2 g
 x2  f½34:94  1017  15:6  1024  s2
 31:2  1024  ½7:8  1024  s2 þ 7:9  1012 g  243:39  1048

We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,


complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001::10
And we can be express by 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. Since it is a very complex
function, we recommend to solve it numerically rather than analytic.
We plot the stability switch diagram based on different delay values of our RFID
double gate system. Since it is a very complex function, we recommend to solve it
numerically rather than analytic.

@Rek 2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g;
@s Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 
@Rek 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2

The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally, when all RFID double gate system’s
parameters are known and the stability switch due to various time delay values s is
described in the following expression:
72 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx ðxðsÞ; sÞg  signfs  xs ðxðsÞÞ


UðxðsÞÞ  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ VðxðsÞÞ
þ xðsÞ þ g
jPðxðsÞÞj2

Remark: we know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies its roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which are xi complex or imaginary
numbered, then unable to analyze stability [5, 6].
Semi-passive RFID Tags with the double loop antennas environment is char-
acterized by electromagnetic interferences which can influence the shifted gate
system stability in time. There are four main RFID double loop antenna variables
which are affected by electromagnetic interferences, first and second loop antenna
voltages and voltages derivatives respectively. Each loop antennas voltage variable
under electromagnetic interferences are characterized by time delay respectively.
The two time delays are not the same, but can be categorized to some sub cases due
to interferences behavior. The first case we analyze is when there is a delay in RFID
first gate’s primary loop antenna voltage and no delay in secondary loop antenna
voltage. The second case we analyze is when there is a delay in RFID gate’s
primary and secondary loop antenna voltages (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s) and no delay in the
gate’s primary and secondary loop antennas voltages derivatives [5, 6]. The third
case we analyze is when there is a delay in RFID gate’s primary and secondary loop
antenna voltages (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD ) and delay in the gate’s primary and
secondary loop antennas voltages derivatives [4, 5]. For simplicity of our analysis
we consider in the third case all delays are the same (there is a difference but it is
neglected in our analysis). In each case we derive the related characteristic equation.
The characteristic equation is dependent on double loop antennas overall parame-
ters and interferences time delay. Upon mathematics manipulation and [BK] the-
orems and definitions we derive the expression which gives us a clear picture on
double loop antennas stability map. The stability map gives all possible options for
stability segments, each segment belongs to different time delay value segment.
Double loop antennas arranged as a shifted gate’s stability analysis can be influ-
enced either by system overall parameter values [5, 6].

1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis Under


Delayed Schottky Diode’s Internal Elements in Time

The RFID market is growing and several cost, size and DC power constraints in the
TAG itself have forced designers to abandon super heterodyne receivers for older
and simpler crystal video receiver. Consisting of a simple detector circuit and a
printed antenna, this receiver can face a stability issues due to delay elements in
time. The Schottky diode detector demodulates the signal and sends the data on to
the digital circuit of the TAG; this is the so-called “wake up” signal. A simple
RFID TAG receiver block diagram includes input antenna signal with series
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 73

resistance, inductor (choke), Schottky diode, and output capacitor. At a small signal
(RF Input) levels, the Schottky diode can be represented by a linear equivalent
circuit. Due to Schottky parasitic delayed in time, there is a stability issue by
analyzing the detector operation. We include two parasitic delay elements in the
Schottky equivalent circuit. We define s1, s2 as delays in time, respectively, for the
Schottky equivalent circuit. We consider first those two delays in time are not equal
s1 6¼ s2 then another three cases s1 = s & s2 = 0, s2 = s & s1 = 0, s1 = s2 = s. The
RFID receiver detector delayed in time equivalent circuit can represent as a delayed
differential equations which depending on variable parameters and delays. The
investigation of our RFID receiver detector system, differential equation based on
bifurcation theory [1], the study of possible changes in the structure of the orbits of
a delayed differential equation depending on variable parameters. We first illustrate
certain observations and analyze local bifurcations of an appropriate arbitrary scalar
delayed differential equation [2]. RFID receiver detector stability analysis is done
under different time delays respect to currents and currents derivative. All of that for
optimization of RFID receiver detector equivalent circuit parameter analysis to get
the best performance. RFID system, the reader or interrogator sends a modulated
RF signal which is received by the TAG. The Schottky diode detector demodulates
the signal and sends the data on to the digital circuits of the TAG. The reader stops
sending modulated data and illuminates the TAG with continuous wave (CW) or
un-modulated signal. The TAG’s FSK encoder and switch driver switch the load
placed on the TAG’s antenna from one state to another, causing the radar cross
section of the TAG to be changed. The weak signal reflected from the TAG is
modulated; this signal is then detected by the reader’s receiver. In this way the
reader and TAG can communicate using RF generated only in the reader. The key
performance parameter for RFID TAG detector diode is operating in the square law
region in voltage sensitivity. For incoming RF small signal from the RFID reader to
the TAG, we can use Schottky diode which represented by a linear equivalent
circuit. Rj is the junction resistance (Rv or video resistance) of the diode, where RF
power is converted into video voltage output. For maximum output, all the
incoming RF voltages should ideally appear across Rj. Cj is the junction capaci-
tance of the diode chip itself. It is a parasitic element which shorts out the junction
resistance, shunting the RF energy to the series resistance Rs. Rs is a parasitic
resistance representing losses in the diode’s bond wire, the bulk silicon at the base
of the chip and other loss mechanisms. The RF voltage appearing across Rs results
in power lost as heat. Lp and Cp are package parasitic inductance and capacitance,
respectively. Unlike the two chips parasitic, they can easily be tuned out with an
external impedance matching network. The package parasitic inductance Lp has a
parasitic delay element in time (s1). The resistance losses in the diode’s bond wire
have a parasitic delay element in time (s2). V(t) represents the RFID tag antenna
voltage in time, the incoming RF small signal from the RFID reader. We consider
ideal delay lines (TAU1, TAU2), Vs1 ! e1 Vs1 ! e2 ; e1 ; e2  e [ 0 [85]
(Fig. 1.22).
74 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Fig. 1.22 RFID TAG receiver detector equivalent circuit

VðtÞ  VA dIL
¼ IRin ; IRin ¼ IL1 þ ILP ; Vs1 ! e1 ; Vs1 ! e2 ; e1 ; e2  e [ 0; VA  VB ¼ LP  P
Rin dt
VB  VC dIL1 dðVB  VD Þ VC  VD
ILP ¼ ICP þ IRS ; IRS ¼ ; VA ¼ L1  ; ICP ¼ CP  ; IRj ¼
RS dt dt Rj
dðVC  VD Þ dVD
ICj ¼ Cj  ; IRS ¼ IRj þ ICj ; IC1 ¼ C1  ; IC1 ¼ ICP þ IRj þ ICj
dt dt
dVD IC1 dðVC  VD Þ dVC dVD dVC dVD
¼ ) ICj ¼ Cj  ¼ Cj  ½   ) ICj ¼ Cj  ½  
dt C1 dt dt dt dt dt
dðVB  VD Þ dVB dVD dVB IC1 VðtÞ  VA
ICP ¼ CP  ¼ CP  ½   ¼ CP  ½  ; ¼ IRin ¼ IL1 þ ILP
dt dt dt dt C1 Rin

VðtÞ L1 dIL1 VðtÞ  VA


  ¼ IL1 þ ILP ; IRin ¼ IL1 þ ILP ) IL1 ¼ IRin  ILP ¼  ILP
Rin Rin dt Rin
VðtÞ L1 d VðtÞ  VA dVB ILP
  ½  ILP  ¼ IL1 þ ILP ¼ IRin ; ICP ¼ CP  ½  
Rin Rin dt Rin dt C1
VC  VD dðVC  VD Þ dðIRj  Rj Þ dIR
I Rj ¼ ) IRj  Rj ¼ VC  VD ; ICj ¼ Cj  ¼ Cj  ¼ Cj  Rj  j
Rj dt dt dt
ILP ¼ ICP þ IRS ) ICP ¼ ILP  IRS ; IC1 ¼ ICP þ IRj þ ICj ¼ ILP  IRS þ IRj þ ICj
IRS ¼ IRj þ ICj ) IC1 ¼ ILP  IRS þ IRj þ ICj ¼ ILP  ðIRj þ ICj Þ þ IRj þ ICj ¼ ILP
VðtÞ  VA VðtÞ 1 dIL 1 dIL
IRin ¼ ¼   L1  1 ¼  ½VðtÞ  L1  1 ; IL1 ¼ IRin  ILP ; ICP ¼ ILP  IRS
Rin Rin Rin dt Rin dt

dVC IC1 d dIR


IC1 ¼ ILP ; IRS ¼ IRj þ ICj ; ICj ¼ Cj  ½   ¼ Cj  ½IRj  Rj  ¼ Cj  Rj  j
dt C1 dt dt
dVB IC1 dILP dIL1 dILP dIL dIL
ICP ¼ CP  ½  ; VA  VB ¼ LP  ) L1   VB ¼ LP  ) VB ¼ L 1  1  L P  P
dt C1 dt dt dt dt dt
dVB d 2 IL1 d 2 ILP dVB IC1 d 2 IL1 d 2 ILP IC1
¼ L1  2  LP  2 ; ICP ¼ CP  ½   ¼ CP  ½L1  2  LP  2  
dt dt dt dt C1 dt dt C1
VðtÞ  VA VðtÞ L1 dIL1
IL1 ¼ IRin  ILP ¼  ILP ¼    ILP ; ICP ¼ ILP  IRS ; IC1 ¼ ILP
Rin Rin Rin dt
VðtÞ L1 dIL1 dIL 1 dVðtÞ L1 d 2 IL1 dILP
IL1 ¼    ILP ) 1 ¼    
Rin Rin dt dt Rin dt Rin dt2 dt
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 75

L1 d 2 IL1 1 dVðtÞ dILP dIL1 d 2 IL 1 dVðtÞ Rin dILP Rin dIL1


 2 ¼    ) 21 ¼     
Rin dt Rin dt dt dt dt L1 dt L1 dt L1 dt
VB  VC
IRS ¼ IRj þ ICj ) ¼ I R j þ I Cj ;
RS
dIR dIR
ICj ¼ IRS  IRj ; ICj ¼ Cj  Rj  j ) IRS  IRj ¼ Cj  Rj  j
dt dt
dVðtÞ dILP dIL1 d 2 I L P I C1
I CP ¼ C P  ½  Rin   Rin   LP  2  
dt dt dt dt C1
2
dVðtÞ dIL dIL d IL IC
ILP  IRS ¼ CP  ½  Rin  P  Rin  1  LP  2 P  1 
dt dt dt dt C1
dVðtÞ dILP dIL1 d 2 IL IL
IC1 ¼ ILP ) ILP  IRS ¼ CP  ½  Rin   Rin   LP  2 P  P 
dt dt dt dt C1
VB  VC
IR S ¼ ) VB  VC ¼ IRS  RS ;
RS
Z
dðVB  VD Þ IC d 1
I CP ¼ C P  ) P ¼ ðVB  VD Þ ) VB  VD ¼  ICP  dt
dt CP dt CP
Z
dðVC  VD Þ ICj dðVC  VD Þ 1
ICj ¼ Cj  ) ¼ ) VC  VD ¼  ICj  dt
dt Cj dt Cj
Z Z
1 1
ð ÞVB  VD ¼  ICP  dt; ð ÞVC  VD ¼  ICj  dt
CP Cj
Z Z
1 1
ð Þ  ð Þ ! VB  VC ¼  ICP  dt   ICj  dt ) IRS  RS
CP Cj
Z Z
1 1
¼  ICP  dt   ICj  dt
CP Cj
Z Z
1 1 dIR 1 1
IRS  RS ¼  ICP  dt   ICj  dt ) RS  S ¼  I CP   I Cj
CP Cj dt CP Cj
dIR 1 1 dIR 1 1
RS  S ¼  ICP   ICj ) RS  S ¼  ðILP  IRS Þ   ðIRS  IRj Þ
dt CP Cj dt CP Cj
dIRS 1 1 1 1 1 1
RS  ¼  ðILP  IRS Þ   ðIRS  IRj Þ ¼  ILP þ  IRj  IRS  ð þ Þ
dt CP Cj CP Cj CP Cj
dIRS 1 1 1 1 dIRS
RS  ¼  IL þ  IRj  IRS  ð þ Þ )
dt CP P Cj CP Cj dt
1 1 1 1
¼  IL þ  IRj  IRS  ð þ Þ
RS  CP P RS  Cj RS  CP RS  Cj
76 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

dIRS
We define Y ¼ ILP ) dt ¼ RS1CP  Y þ 1
RS Cj  IRj  IRS  ðRS1CP þ RS Cj Þ
1

dIRS 1 1 1 1
Y ¼ I LP ) ¼ Yþ  IRj  IRS  ð þ Þ
dt RS  CP RS  Cj RS  CP RS  Cj
VðtÞ L1 dIL1 VðtÞ
  ¼ I L1 þ I LP )  I L1  I LP
Rin Rin dt Rin
L1 dIL1 VðtÞ Rin Rin dIL
¼  )   I L1   I LP ¼ 1
Rin dt L1 L1 L1 dt

dVðtÞ dIL dIL d 2 IL IL


ILP  IRS ¼ CP  ½  Rin  P  Rin  1  LP  2 P  P 
dt dt dt dt C1
dVðtÞ dILP VðtÞ Rin Rin d 2 IL IL
ILP  IRS ¼ CP  ½  Rin   Rin  ð   IL1   ILP Þ  LP  2 P  P 
dt dt L1 L1 L1 dt C1

dVðtÞ dIL Rin  VðtÞ R2in R2 d 2 IL


ILP  IRS ¼ CP  ½  Rin  P  þ  IL1 þ in  ILP  LP  2 P
dt dt L1 L1 L1 dt
ILP
 
C1

dVðtÞ dIL CP  Rin  VðtÞ


 ILP þ IRS þ CP   CP  Rin  P 
dt dt L1
R2
R 2 2
d IL CP  ILP
þ CP  in  IL1 þ CP  in  ILP  CP  LP  2 P  ¼0
L1 L1 dt C1

d 2 ILP dIL R2 CP
 CP  LP  2
 CP  Rin  P þ ILP  ½CP  in   1
dt dt L1 C1
R2 CP  Rin  VðtÞ dVðtÞ
þ IRS þ CP  in  IL1  þ CP  ¼0
L1 L1 dt

dILP d 2 ILP dILP


We define: Y ¼ ILP ; X ¼ dt ; dX
dt ¼ dt2 ; dY
dt ¼ dt ¼X then we get the
expression:

dX R2 CP
 CP  LP   CP  Rin  X þ Y  ½CP  in   1
dt L1 C1
R2 CP  Rin  VðtÞ dVðtÞ
þ IRS þ CP  in  IL1  þ CP  ¼0
L1 L1 dt

dX R2 CP
CP  LP  ¼ CP  Rin  X þ Y  ½CP  in   1
dt L1 C1
R2 CP  Rin  VðtÞ dVðtÞ
þ IRS þ CP  in  IL1  þ CP  ¼0
L1 L1 dt
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 77

dX Rin R2 1 1
¼  X þ Y  ½ in   
dt LP L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP
1 R2in Rin  VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
þ IR S  þ  IL  þ 
CP  LP L1  LP 1 L1  LP LP dt

dY dIL VðtÞ Rin Rin dIR 1 1


¼ X; 1 ¼   I L1   Y; j ¼  IR S   IRj
dt dt L1 L1 L1 dt Cj  Rj Cj  Rj
dIRS 1 1 1 1 1
¼ Yþ  IRj  IRS   ð þ Þ
dt RS  CP RS  Cj RS CP Cj

We have five variables in our system: X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRS and we can represent our
system as the following set of differential equations matrix representation.
0 1
dX
0 1
B dt C Rin 0 1
B C 0 1 1
B dY C X B L1  LP C
B C B C B C
B dt C 0 1 B YC B C B LP C
B C N . . . N1n B C B 0 C B 0C
B dIL1 C B .11 .. .. C B C B C B C
B C¼@ . B C B 1 C  VðtÞ þ B C  dVðtÞ
B dt C . . . A B IL1 C þ B C B 0 C dt
B C B C B C B C
B dIR C Nm1    Nmn n¼m¼5 @ IRj A B L1 C B 0C
B j C B C @ A
B C IRS @ 0 A
B dt C 0
@ dI A 0
RS
dt

Rin R2in 1 1 1 R2in 1 1 R2in


N11 ¼  ; N12 ¼   ¼ ð   Þ; N13 ¼ ; N14 ¼ 0
LP L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP LP L1 C1 CP L1  LP
1 Rin Rin
N15 ¼ ; N21 ¼ 1; N22 ¼ N23 ¼ N24 ¼ N25 ¼ 0; N31 ¼ 0; N32 ¼  ; N33 ¼ 
CP  LP L1 L1
1 1 1
N34 ¼ N35 ¼ 0; N41 ¼ N42 ¼ N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼  ; N45 ¼ ; N51 ¼ 0; N52 ¼
Cj  Rj Cj  Rj RS  CP
1 1 1 1
N53 ¼ 0; N54 ¼ ; N55 ¼   ð þ Þ:
RS  Cj RS CP Cj

We consider RF in signal VðtÞ ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ; jf ðtÞj\1 & A0  jf ðtÞj then


df ðtÞ
VðtÞjA0 jf ðtÞj VðtÞjA0 jf ðtÞj ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ  A0 ; dVðtÞ
dt jA0 jf ðtÞj ¼ dt ! e. We can our
matrix representation: e ! 0. Due to parasitic delay elements in Schottky
78 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

equivalent circuit, s1 for the current flow through Schottky diode’s package para-
sitic inductance (LP) and s2 for the current flow through Schottky diode’s parasitic
resistance (RS).

YðtÞ ¼ ILP ðtÞ ! Yðt  s1 Þ ¼ ILP ðt  s1 Þ; IRS ðtÞ ! IRS ðt  s2 Þ:

dI ðtÞ dI dI
And XðtÞ ¼ LdtP ; IL1 ðtÞ; IRj ðtÞ. We consider no delay effects on dY
dt ¼ dt ; dt .
LP RS

To find equilibrium points (fixed points) of the RFID tag detector, we define

lim Yðt  s1 Þ ¼ YðtÞ; lim ILP ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ILP ðtÞ; lim IRS ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IRS ðtÞ
t!1 t!1 t!1
0 1
dX 1 0 R 1
0
B dY C 0
dt 1 X  L Lin
B dt C N . . . N1n BY C B0 1 PC
B dIL1 C B .11 .. .. C B C B C
B dt C ¼ @ . B C B1 C  A0 þ e
B dIR C . . . A B IL1 C þ B L1 C
B jC @ IR A @ 0 A
@ dt A Nm1    Nmn n¼m¼5 j
dIRS IRS 0
dt

In equilibrium points (fixed points)

dY dILP dIR
¼ ¼ 0; S ¼ 0 8 t  s1 ; t  s2
dt dt dt
9 ðt  s1 Þ  t; ðt  s2 Þ  t; t ! 1

We get five equations:

Rin R2 1 1 1
  X þ Y  ½ in    þ IR S 
LP L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP CP  LP
R2in Rin  VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
þ  I  þ  ¼0
L 1  L P L1 L1  LP LP dt

VðtÞ Rin Rin 1 1


X ¼ 0;  I   Y ¼ 0;  I   I ¼ 0
L1 L1 L1 L1 C j  Rj R S C j  Rj R j
1 1 1 1 1
 Y þ  IR j  IR S   ð þ Þ ¼ 0
RS  CP RS  Cj RS C P C j

Since X ¼ 0 then
R2in 1 1 1
Y  ½    þ IR S 
L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP CP  LP
R2in Rin  VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
þ  IL 1  þ  ¼ 0:
L1  LP L1  LP LP dt
VðtÞ Rin Rin VðtÞ
 I   Y ¼ 0 ) Y ¼  IL 1 :
L1 L1 L1 L1 Rin
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 79

Then

1 VðtÞ 1 1 1 1
ð  IL 1 Þ þ  I  IR S   ð þ Þ ¼ 0
RS  CP Rin RS  Cj Rj RS CP Cj
VðtÞ R2 1 1 1
ð  IL 1 Þ  ½ in    þ IR S 
Rin L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP CP  LP
R2in Rin  VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
þ  I  þ  ¼0
L1  LP L1 L1  LP LP dt

We get three equations: 1


Cj Rj  IR S  Cj1Rj  IR j ¼ 0

1 1
 I   I ¼ 0
Cj  Rj RS Cj  Rj Rj
1 VðtÞ 1 1 1 1
ð  IL 1 Þ þ  I  IR S   ð þ Þ ¼ 0
RS  CP Rin RS  Cj Rj RS CP Cj
VðtÞ R2 1 1 1
ð  IL 1 Þ  ½ in    þ IR S 
Rin L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP CP  LP
R2in Rin  VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
þ  I  þ  ¼0
L1  LP L1 L1  LP LP dt
1 1
 IR S   I ¼ 0 ) IR j ¼ IR S
Cj  Rj Cj  Rj Rj

We get two equations:

1 VðtÞ 1 1 1 1
ð  IL 1 Þ þ  IR S  IR S   ð þ Þ ¼ 0
RS  CP Rin RS  Cj RS CP Cj
VðtÞ R2 1 1 1
ð  IL 1 Þ  ½ in    þ IR S 
Rin L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP CP  LP
R2in R  VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
 I 
in
þ þ  ¼0
L1  LP L1 L1  LP LP dt

By mathematic manipulation, we get the following two equations:

VðtÞ VðtÞ
 IL 1  IR S ¼ 0 ) IR S ¼  IL 1
Rin Rin
1 1 1
IL 1  ð þ Þ þ IR S 
C1 CP CP
1 R2 1 1 Rin dVðtÞ
þ VðtÞ  f  ½ in     gþ ¼0
Rin L1 C1 CP L1 dt
80 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

We define for simplicity:

1 R2in 1 1 Rin
X¼ ½   
Rin L1 C1 CP L1

VðtÞ 1 1 1 dVðtÞ
IR S ¼  IL 1 ; IL 1  ð þ Þ þ IR S  þ VðtÞ  X þ ¼0
Rin C1 CP CP dt

1 1 VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
IL 1  ð þ Þþð  IL 1 Þ  þ VðtÞ  X þ ¼0
C1 CP Rin CP dt
1 1 dVðtÞ
) IL 1  þ VðtÞ  ½ þ X þ ¼0
C1 Rin  CP dt
1 1 dVðtÞ
IL 1  þ VðtÞ  ½ þ X þ ¼0
C1 Rin  CP dt
1 dVðtÞ
) IL 1 ¼ C1  fVðtÞ  ½ þ X þ g
Rin  CP dt

VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
IR S ¼ þ C1  fVðtÞ  ½ þ X þ g
Rin Rin  CP dt
1 1 dVðtÞ
¼ VðtÞ  f þ C1  ½ þ Xg þ C1 
Rin Rin  CP dt

We define:

1 1 dVðtÞ
X1 ¼ þ C1  ½ þ X; IR S ¼ VðtÞ  X1 þ C1 
Rin Rin  CP dt
dVðtÞ
IR j ¼ IR S ) IR j ¼ VðtÞ  X1 þ C1  ; X ¼ 0
dt
VðtÞ 1 1 dVðtÞ
Y ¼  IL 1 ¼ VðtÞ  f þ C1  ½ þ Xg þ C1 
Rin Rin Rin  CP dt

We can summery our system fixed points in the next table:

Fixed point coordinates Fixed points expression VðtÞjA0 jf ðtÞj ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ  A0
E ðX ; Y ; VðtÞ ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ dVðtÞ
¼ dfdtðtÞ ! e
dt jA0 jf ðtÞj
IL 1 ; IR j ; IR S Þ jf ðtÞj\1 & A0  jf ðtÞj

X 0 0
Y VðtÞ  fR1in þ C1  ½Rin1CP þ Xg þ C1  dVðtÞ A0  fR1in þ C1  ½Rin1CP þ Xg
dt
IL 1 C1  fVðtÞ  ½Rin1CP þ X þ dVðtÞ C1  A0  ½Rin1CP þ X
dt g
IR j VðtÞ  X1 þ C1  dVðtÞ A 0  X1
dt
IR S VðtÞ  fR1in þ C1  ½Rin1CP þ Xg þ C1  dVðtÞ A0  fR1in þ C1  ½Rin1CP þ Xg
dt
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 81

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the RFID tag detector system consists in adding to coordinate
½X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRs  arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs  
ekt and retaining the first order terms in X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRs . The system of five ho-
mogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigen-
values. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set the below currents
and currents derivative with respect to time into RFID tag detector system equa-
tions. RFID tag detector system fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of
exponential form ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs   ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second
fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.

XðtÞ ¼ X ðjÞ þ x  ekt ; YðtÞ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt ;


ðjÞ
Yðt  s1 Þ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y  ekðts1 Þ ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRj ðtÞ ¼ IRj þ iRj  ekt ; IRS ðtÞ ¼ IRS þ iRS  ekt ;
ðjÞ
IRS ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IRS þ iRS  ekðts2 Þ :

We choose these expressions for ourselves XðtÞ; YðtÞ; IL1 ðtÞ and IRj ðtÞ; IRS ðtÞ as a
small displacement ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs  from the RFID tag detector system fixed points
in time t = 0.
Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X ðjÞ þ x; Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y;
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ; IRj ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IRj þ iRj
ðjÞ
IRS ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IRS þ iRS

For k\0; t [ 0, the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k [ 0; t [ 0 is


unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for k\0; t [ 0
otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k Is the eigenvalue
parameter which is established if the fixed point is stable or unstable; additionally,
his absolute value (jkj) establishes the speed of flow toward or away from the
selected fixed point (Yuri 1995; Jack and Huseyin 1991). The speeds of flow toward
or away from the selected fixed point for Schottky detector system currents and
currents derivatives with respect to time are

dXðtÞ Xðt þ DtÞ  XðtÞ X ðjÞ þ x  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½X ðjÞ þ x  ekt  ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ lim ¼ lim ¼ ! k  x  ekt
dt Dt!1 Dt Dt!1 Dt
dYðtÞ Yðt þ DtÞ  YðtÞ Y ðjÞ þ y  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt  ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ lim ¼ lim ¼ ! k  y  ekt
dt Dt!1 Dt Dt!1 Dt
dIL1 ðtÞ dIRj ðtÞ dIRS ðtÞ dYðt  s1 Þ
¼ k  iL1  ekt ; ¼ k  iRj  ekt ; ¼ k  iRS  ekt ; ¼ k  y  ekt  eks1
dt dt dt dt
dIRS ðt  s2 Þ
¼ k  iRS  ekt  eks2
dt
82 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

First, we take Schottky detector variable X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRs differential equations
and adding to coordinate ½X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRs  arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential terms ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs   ekt and retaining the first order terms in
x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs (VðtÞ ! e; dVðtÞ
dt ! e) then

E ðX ; Y ; IL 1 ; IR j ; IR S Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0; 0Þ;
ðj¼0Þ ðj¼0Þ ðj¼0Þ
X ðj¼0Þ ¼ 0; Y ðj¼0Þ ¼ 0; IL1 ¼ 0; IRj ¼ 0; IRS ¼ 0:

We can see that our fixed point is a saddle node. We define Yðt  s1 Þ ¼
ðjÞ
Y þ y  ekðts1 Þ and IRS ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IRS þ iRS  ekðts2 Þ . Then we get five delayed
ðjÞ

differential equations with respect to coordinates ½X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRs  arbitrarily small
increments of exponential ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs   ekt . We consider no delay effects on
dYðtÞ dIRS ðtÞ
dt and dt . We get the following equations:

k\0 k[0
ðjÞ
t=0 Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X þx Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X ðjÞ þ x
ðjÞ
Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y þy Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRj ðtÞ ¼ IRj þ iRj IRj ðtÞ ¼ IRj þ iRj
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRS ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IRS þ iRS IRS ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IRS þ iRS
t>0 XðtÞ ¼ X ðjÞ þ x  ejkjt XðtÞ ¼ X ðjÞ þ x  ejkjt
ðjÞ jkjt
YðtÞ ¼ Y þy  e YðtÞ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y  ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ejkjt IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRj ðtÞ ¼ IRj þ iRj  ejkjt IRj ðtÞ ¼ IRj þ iRj  ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRS ðtÞ ¼ IRS þ iRS  ejkjt IRS ðtÞ ¼ IRS þ iRS  ejkjt
t > 0; t ! ∞ Xðt ! 1Þ ¼ X ðjÞ Xðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ ¼ x  ejkjt
ðjÞ
Yðt ! 1Þ ¼ Y Yðt ! 1; kÞ ¼ y  ejkjt
ðjÞ
IL1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ IL1 IL1 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ ¼ iL1  ejkjt
ðjÞ
IRj ðt ! 1Þ ¼ IRj IRj ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ ¼ iRj  ejkjt
ðjÞ
IRS ðt ! 1Þ ¼ IRS IRS ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ ¼ iRS  ejkjt

Rin R2 1 1
k  x  ekt ¼   ½X ðjÞ þ x  ekt  þ ½Y ðjÞ þ y  ekðts1 Þ   ½ in   
LP L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP
ðjÞ 1 R2in ðjÞ
þ ½IRS þ iRS  ekðts2 Þ   þ  ½I þ iL1  ekt 
CP  LP L1  LP L1
Rin  VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ dVðtÞ
 þ  ; VðtÞ; !e
L1  LP LP dt dt
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 83

Rin ðjÞ Rin R2 1 1


k  x  ekt ¼  X   x  ekt þ Y ðjÞ  ½ in   
LP LP L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP
R2 1 1 ðjÞ 1
þ y  ½ in     ekðts1 Þ IRS 
L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP CP  LP
1 R2in ðjÞ R2in
þ iRS   ekðts2 Þ þ  I L1 þ  iL  ekt
CP  LP L1  LP L1  LP 1

Rin ðjÞ R2 1 1
k  x  ekt ¼   X þ Y ðjÞ  ½ in   
LP L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP
ðjÞ 1 R2in ðjÞ Rin
þ IRS  þ I   x  ekt
CP  LP L1  LP L1 LP
R2 1 1
þ y  ½ in     ekðts1 Þ
L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP
1 R2in
þ iRS   ekðts2 Þ þ  iL  ekt
CP  LP L1  LP 1

At fixed point:
Rin ðjÞ R2 1 1 ðjÞ 1 R2in ðjÞ
  X þ Y ðjÞ  ½ in    þ IRS  þ I ¼0
LP L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP CP  LP L1  LP L1

Then

Rin R2 1 1
 x  ekt  ½k þ  þ y  ½ in     ekðts1 Þ
LP L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP
1 R2in
þ iRS   ekðts2 Þ þ  iL  ekt ¼ 0
CP  LP L1  LP 1
dY
¼ X ) k  y  ekt ¼ X ðjÞ þ x  ekt :
dt

At fixed point X ðjÞ ¼ 0 ) x þ k  y ¼ 0


VðtÞ Rin ðjÞ Rin
k  iL1  ekt ¼   ½I þ iL1  ekt    ½Y ðjÞ þ y  ekðts1 Þ ; VðtÞ ! e
L1 L1 L1 L1
Rin ðjÞ Rin ðjÞ Rin kt Rin kðts1 Þ
k  iL1  ekt ¼  I   Y  i L1  e y e :
L1 L1 L1 L1 L1
ðjÞ
At fixed point  RLin1  IL1  RLin1  Y ðjÞ ¼ 0 then
84 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Rin kt Rin kðts1 Þ


 k  iL1  ekt  iL1  e y e ¼0
L1 L1
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
k  iRj  ekt ¼  ½IRS þ iRS  ekðts2 Þ    ½I þ iRj  ekt 
Cj  Rj Cj  Rj Rj
1 1
 k  iRj  ekt  iRj   ekt þ iRS   ekðts2 Þ
Cj  Rj Cj  Rj
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
þ I  I ¼0
Cj  Rj RS Cj  Rj Rj

ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point 1
Cj Rj  IRS  Cj1Rj  IRj ¼ 0 then iRj  ekt  ½k þ Cj Rj  þ
1

iRS  Cj1Rj  ekðts2 Þ ¼ 0

1 1 ðjÞ
k  iRS  ekt ¼  ½Y ðjÞ þ y  ekðts1 Þ  þ  ½I þ iRj  ekt 
RS  CP RS  Cj Rj
ðjÞ 1 1 1
 ½IRS þ iRS  ekðts2 Þ    ð þ Þ
RS CP Cj

1 1 1 ðjÞ
k  iRS  ekt ¼  Y ðjÞ þ y   ekðts1 Þ þ I
RS  CP RS  CP RS  Cj Rj
1 ðjÞ 1 1 1
þ iRj   ekt  IRS   ð þ Þ
RS  Cj RS CP Cj
1 1 1
 iRS   ð þ Þ  ekðts2 Þ
RS CP Cj

1 1 ðjÞ ðjÞ 1 1 1
k  iRS  ekt ¼  Y ðjÞ þ  I  IRS   ð þ Þ
RS  CP RS  Cj Rj RS CP Cj
1 1
þy   ekðts1 Þ þ iRj   ekt
RS  CP RS  Cj
1 1 1
 iRS   ð þ Þ  ekðts2 Þ
RS CP Cj

ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point 1
RS CP  Y ðjÞ þ 1
RS Cj  IRj  IRS  R1S  ðC1P þ C1j Þ ¼ 0 then

1 1 1
 iRS  ekt  ½k þ  ð þ Þ  eks2 
RS CP Cj
1 1
þy   ekðts1 Þ þ iRj   ekt ¼ 0
RS  CP RS  Cj
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 85

We can summarize our last results:

Rin R2 1 1
 x  ½k þ  þ y  ½ in     eks1
LP L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP
R2in 1
þ  iL þ iRS   eks2 ¼ 0
L1  LP 1 CP  LP
xky¼0
Rin ks1 Rin
y e  i L1  ½ þ k ¼ 0
L1 L1
1 1
 iRj  ½k þ  þ iRS   eks2 ¼ 0
Cj  Rj Cj  Rj
1 1 1 1 1
y  eks1 þ iRj   iRS  ½k þ  ð þ Þ  eks2  ¼ 0
RS  CP RS  Cj RS CP Cj

The small increments Jacobian of our RFID Schotky detector system is as


follows:
0 1
0 1 x
!11 . . . !15 B C
By C
B . .. .. C B C
B . C  B iL1 C ¼ 0; !11 ¼  Rin  k;
@ . . . A B C
B C LP
!51    !55 @ iRj A
iRS
R2in 1 1
!12 ¼ ½     eks1
L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP
R2in 1
!13 ¼ ; !14 ¼ 0; !15 ¼  eks2 ;
L1  LP CP  LP
!21 ¼ 1; !22 ¼ k; !23 ¼ !24 ¼ !25 ¼ 0
Rin ks1 Rin
!31 ¼ 0; !32 ¼  e ; !33 ¼   k;
L1 L1
!34 ¼ 0; !35 ¼ 0; !41 ¼ !42 ¼ !43 ¼ 0
1 1
!44 ¼  k; !45 ¼  eks2 ;
Cj  Rj Cj  Rj
1
!51 ¼ 0; !52 ¼  eks1 ; !53 ¼ 0
RS  CP
1 1 1 1
!54 ¼ ; !55 ¼   ð þ Þ  eks2  k
RS  Cj RS CP Cj
0 1
!11 ... !15
B .. .. .. C
jA  k  Ij ¼ @ . . . A; detjA  k  Ij ¼ 0
!51  !55
86 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

We define for simplicity the following parameters:


Rin R2in 1 1
r1 ¼  ; r2 ¼   ;
LP L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP
R2in 1 Rin
r3 ¼ ; r4 ¼ ; r5 ¼ 
L1  LP CP  LP L1
1 1 1 1 1 1
r6 ¼ ; r7 ¼ ; r8 ¼ ; r9 ¼   ð þ Þ
C j  Rj RS  CP RS  Cj RS CP Cj

 11 ¼ r1  k;  12 ¼ r2  eks1 ;  13 ¼ r3 ;  14 ¼ 0;
 15 ¼ r4  eks2 ;  21 ¼ 1;  22 ¼ k;  23 ¼  24 ¼  25 ¼ 0
 31 ¼ 0;  32 ¼ r5  eks1 ;  33 ¼ r5  k;
 34 ¼ 0;  35 ¼ 0;  41 ¼  42 ¼  43 ¼ 0
 44 ¼ r6  k;  45 ¼ r6  eks2 ;  51 ¼ 0;
 52 ¼ r7  eks1 ;  53 ¼ 0;  54 ¼ r8 ;  55 ¼ r9  eks2  k

We need to find Dðs1 ; s2 Þ for the following cases: (A) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0


(B) s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s (C) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s. We need to get characteristics equations for all
above stability analysis cases. We study the occurrence of any possible stability
switching, resulting from the increase of the value of the time delays s1 ; s2 for the
general characteristic equation Dðs1 ; s2 Þ. If we choose s as a parameter, then the
expression: Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m [12, 18, 19].
0 1 0 1
!11 . . . !15 r5  k 0 0
B . .. C
.. C B C
B
det@ .. r6  eks2
. . A ¼ ðr1  kÞ  ðkÞ  det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A
ks2
!51    !55 0 r8 ðr 9  e  kÞ
0 1
r5  k 0 0
B C
 r2  eks1  det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A
0 r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
0 1
r5  eks1 0 0
B C
þ r3  fdet@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A
ks1 ks2
r7  e r8 ðr9  e  kÞ
0 1
0 0 0
B C
þ k  det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 Ag
0 r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
0 ks1
1
r5  e r5  k 0
B C
þ r4  eks2  fdet@ 0 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A
ks1
r7  e 0 r8
0 1
0 r5  k 0
B C
þ k  det@ 0 0 ðr6 þ kÞ Ag
0 0 r8
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 87

0 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 r5  k 0
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A ¼ 0; det@ 0 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A ¼ 0
0 r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ 0 0 r8

We get the following expression:


0 1 0 1
!11 ... !15 r5  k 0 0
B . .. C
.. C B C
B
det@ .. r6  eks2
. . A ¼ ðr1  kÞ  ðkÞ  det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A
ks2
!51  !55 0 r 8 ðr 9  e  kÞ
0 1
r5  k 0 0
B C
 r2  eks1  det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A
0 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
r8
0 1
r5  eks1 0 0
B C
þ r3  det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A
ks1 ks2
r7  e r8 ðr9  e  kÞ
0 1
r5  eks1 r5  k 0
B C
þ r4  eks2  det@ 0 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A
r7  eks1 0 r8

First expression:
0 1
r5  k 0 0 !
B ks2 C ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  e A ¼ ðr5  kÞ  det
r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
0 r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
¼ ðr5  kÞ  fðr6 þ kÞ  ðr9  eks2  kÞ  r8  r6  eks2 g
¼ ðr5  kÞ  fr6  r9  eks2 þ r6  k  k  r9  eks2 þ k2  r8  r6  eks2 g
¼ ðr5  kÞ  fr6  k þ k2  ½r6  r9 þ r8  r6 þ k  r9   eks2 g

0 1
r5  k 0 0
B C
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A
0 r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
!
ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2
¼ ðr5  kÞ  det
r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
¼ ðr5  kÞ  fðr6 þ kÞ  ðr9  eks2  kÞ  r8  r6  eks2 g
¼ ðr5  kÞ  fr6  r9  eks2 þ r6  k  k  r9  eks2 þ k2  r8  r6  eks2 g
¼ ðr5  kÞ  fr6  k þ k2  ½r6  r9 þ r8  r6 þ k  r9   eks2 g
88 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

¼ r5  r6  k þ r5  k2  r5  ½r6  r9 þ r8  r6 þ k  r9   eks2
 r6  k2  k3 þ k  ½r6  r9 þ r8  r6 þ k  r9   eks2
¼ r5  r6  k þ r5  k2  ½r5  r6  r9 þ r5  r8  r6 þ k  r5  r9   eks2
 r6  k2  k3 þ ½k  ðr6  r9 þ r8  r6 Þ þ k2  r9   eks2
¼ r5  r6  k þ ðr5  r6 Þ  k2  k3
þ fr5  r6  ðr9 þ r8 Þ þ k  ðr6  r9 þ r8  r6  r5  r9 Þ þ k2  r9 g  eks2

We define for simplicity:

w1 ¼ r5  r6 ; w2 ¼ r5  r6 ;
w3 ¼ r5  r6  ðr9 þ r8 Þ
w4 ¼ r6  r9 þ r8  r6  r5  r9

Then we define
0 1
r5  k 0 0
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A
ks2
0 r8 ðr9  e  kÞ
¼ w1  k þ w2  k2  k3 þ fw3 þ k  w4 þ k2  r9 g  eks2

Second expression:
0 1
r5  eks1 0 0
B C
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A
r7  eks1 r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
!
ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2
¼ r5  eks1  det
r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
¼ r5  eks1  fðr6 þ kÞ  ðr9  eks2  kÞ  r8  r6  eks2 g
¼ r5  eks1  fr6  r9  eks2 þ r6  k  k  r9  eks2 þ k2  r8  r6  eks2 g
¼ r5  eks1  fr6  k þ k2  ½r6  r9 þ r8  r6 þ k  r9   eks2 g
¼ ðr6  k þ k2 Þ  r5  eks1  r5  ½r6  r9 þ r8  r6 þ k  r9   ekðs2 þ s1 Þ ;
w5 ¼ r6  r9 þ r8  r6
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 89

0 1
r5  eks1 0 0
B C
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A
r7  eks1 r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
¼ ðr6  k þ k2 Þ  r5  eks1  r5  ½w5 þ k  r9   ekðs2 þ s1 Þ

Third expression:
0 1
r5  eks1 ðr5  kÞ 0
B C
det@ 0 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A
r7  eks1 0 r8
 
ks1 0 ðr 6 þ kÞ
¼ r5  e  det
0 r8
 
0 ðr6 þ kÞ
 ðr5  kÞ  det
r7  eks1 r8
 
0 ðr6 þ kÞ
¼ ðr5  kÞ  det ¼ ðr5  kÞ  r7  eks1  ðr6 þ kÞ
r7  eks1 r8
¼ ðr5  kÞ  r7  ðr6 þ kÞ  eks1 ¼ r7  ðr5  r6  r5  k þ k  r6 þ k2 Þ  eks1
¼ r7  ðr5  r6 þ k  ½r6  r5  þ k2 Þ  eks1

w1 ¼ r5  r6 ; w2 ¼ r5  r6 ) w2 ¼ r6  r5
0 1
r5  eks1 ðr5  kÞ 0
det@ 0 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A ¼ r7  ðw1  k  w2 þ k2 Þ  eks1
r7  eks1 0 r8

We integrate our expression in below Dðs1 ; s2 Þ expression.


0 1 0 1
!11 ... !15 r5  k 0 0
B . .. C
.. C B C
B
det@ .. r6  eks2
. . A ¼ ðr1  kÞ  ðkÞ  det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A
ks2
!51  !55 0 r 8 ðr 9  e  kÞ
0 1
r5  k 0 0
B C
 r2  eks1  det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A
0 r8 ðr9  eks2  kÞ
0 1
r5  eks1 0 0
B C
þ r3  det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6  eks2 A
ks1 ks2
r7  e r8 ðr9  e  kÞ
0 1
r5  eks1 r5  k 0
B C
þ r4  eks2  det@ 0 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A
r7  eks1 0 r8
90 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

0 1
!11 ... !15
B . .. .. C
detB
@ .. .
C
. A ¼ ðr1  kÞ  ðkÞ  ½w1  k þ w2  k  k
2 3

!51  !55


þ fw3 þ k  w4 þ k2  r9 g  eks2 
 r2  eks1  ½w1  k þ w2  k2  k3
þ fw3 þ k  w4 þ k2  r9 g  eks2 
þ r3  ½ðr6  k þ k2 Þ  r5  eks1
 r5  ½w5 þ k  r9   ekðs2 þ s1 Þ 
þ r4  eks2  ½r7  ðw1  k  w2 þ k2 Þ  eks1 
0 1
!11 ... !15
B . .. .. C
B
det@ .. C
. A ¼ ðk  r1 kÞ  ½w1  k þ w2  k  k
2 2 3
.
!51  !55
þ fw3 þ k  w4 þ k2  r9 g  eks2 
 ½ðw1  k þ w2  k2  k3 Þ  r2  eks1
þ r2  fw3 þ k  w4 þ k2  r9 g  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ 
þ r3  ðr6  k þ k2 Þ  r5  eks1
 r3  r5  ½w5 þ k  r9   ekðs2 þ s1 Þ
þ ðw1  r4  r7  k  w2  r4  r7 þ k2  r4  r7 Þ  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
0 1
!11 ... !15
B . .. .. C
B
det@ .. C
. A ¼ w1  k þ w2  k  k
3 4 5
.
!51  !55
þ fw3  k2 þ k3  w4 þ k4  r9 g  eks2
 r1  w1  k2  r1  w2  k3 þ r1  k4
þ fr1  w3  k  r1  w4  k2  r1  r9  k3 g  eks2
 ðw1  k þ w2  k2  k3 Þ  r2  eks1
 r2  fw3 þ k  w4 þ k2  r9 g  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
þ ðr3  r6  k þ r3  k2 Þ  r5  eks1
 r3  r5  ½w5 þ k  r9   ekðs2 þ s1 Þ
þ ðw1  r4  r7  k  w2  r4  r7 þ k2  r4  r7 Þ  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 91

0 1
!11 ... !15
B . .. .. C
B
det@ .. C
. A ¼ r1  w1  k þ ðw1  r1  w2 Þ  k þ ðw2 þ r1 Þ  k  k
2 3 4 5
.
!51  !55
 ðw1  k þ w2  k2  k3 Þ  r2  eks1
þ ðr3  r6  k þ r3  k2 Þ  r5  eks1
þ fw3  k2 þ k3  w4 þ k4  r9 g  eks2
þ fr1  w3  k  r1  w4  k2  r1  r9  k3 g  eks2
 r2  fw3 þ k  w4 þ k2  r9 g  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
 r3  r5  ½w5 þ k  r9   ekðs2 þ s1 Þ
þ ðw1  r4  r7  k  w2  r4  r7 þ k2  r4  r7 Þ  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
0 1
!11 ... !15
B . .. .. C
B
det@ .. C
. A ¼ r1  w1  k þ ðw1  r1  w2 Þ  k þ ðw2 þ r1 Þ  k  k
2 3 4 5
.
!51  !55
þ ðw1  r2  k  w2  r2  k2 þ r2  k3 Þ  eks1
þ ðr3  r6  r5  k þ r3  r5  k2 Þ  eks1
þ fw3  k2 þ k3  w4 þ k4  r9 g  eks2
þ fr1  w3  k  r1  w4  k2  r1  r9  k3 g  eks2
þ fr2  w3  k  r2  w4  k2  r2  r9 g  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
þ ½r3  r5  w5  k  r3  r5  r9   ekðs2 þ s1 Þ
þ ðw1  r4  r7  k  w2  r4  r7 þ k2  r4  r7 Þ  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
0 1
!11 . . . !15
B . .. .. C
B
det@ .. C
. A ¼ r1  w1  k þ ðw1  r1  w2 Þ  k þ ðw2 þ r1 Þ  k  k
2 3 4 5
.
!51    !55
þ fðr3  r6  r5  w1  r2 Þ  k
þ ðr3  r5  w2  r2 Þ  k2 þ r2  k3 g  eks1
þ fr1  w3  k þ ðw3  r1  w4 Þ  k2
þ ðw4  r1  r9 Þ  k3 þ k4  r9 g  eks2
þ fr2  w3  r3  r5  w5  w1  r4  r7
 ðw2  r4  r7 þ r2  w4 þ r3  r5  r9 Þ  k
þ ðr4  r7  r2  r9 Þ  k2 g  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
92 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

We define for simplicity the following parameters:


H2 ¼ r1  w1 ; H3 ¼ w1  r1  w2 ; H4 ¼ w2 þ r1 ; H5 ¼ 1
A1 ¼ r3  r6  r5  w1  r2 ; A2 ¼r3  r5  w2  r2 ; A3 ¼r2
B1 ¼ r1  w3 ; B2 ¼ w3  r1  w4 ; B3 ¼ w4  r1  r9 ; B4 ¼ r9
C0 ¼ r2  w3  r3  r5  w5  w1  r4  r7 ;
C1 ¼ ðw2  r4  r7 þ r2  w4 þ r3  r5  r9 Þ
C2 ¼ r4  r7  r2  r9
0 1
!11 . . . !15
B . .. .. C X5 X 3
detB
@ .. .
C
. A¼ H l  kl þ ½ Ak  kk   eks1
l¼2 k¼1
!51    !55
X4 X2
þ½ Bk  kk   eks2 þ ½ Ck  kk   ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
k¼1 k¼0

X
5 X
3
Dðs1 ; s2 Þ ¼ Hl  k l þ ½ Ak  kk   eks1
l¼2 k¼1
X4 X
2
þ½ Bk  kk   eks2 þ ½ Ck  kk   ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
k¼1 k¼0

Three cases: (A) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0 (B)s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s (C) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s.

X
5 X4
s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; DðsÞ ¼ H l  kl þ ½ B k  kk 
l¼2 k¼1
ðAÞ
X
3 X
2
þ½ Ak  kk   eks þ ½ Ck  kk   eks
k¼1 k¼0
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 93
X
5 X4
Dðs1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ H l  kl þ ½ B k  kk 
l¼2 k¼1
X
3 X2
þ½ Ak  kk   eks þ ½ Ck  kk   eks
k¼1 k¼0
X
4
Dðs1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ B1  k þ ðHl þ Bl Þ  kl
l¼2
X
2
þ H5  k5 þ ½C0 þ ðAl þ Cl Þ  kl þ A3  k3   eks
l¼1

Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m


X
4
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ B1  k þ ðHl þ Bl Þ  kl þ H5  k5 ; n ¼ 5;
l¼2
X
2
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ ½C0 þ ðAl þ Cl Þ  kl þ A3  k3 ; m ¼ 3
l¼1
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k þ P3 ðsÞ  k þ . . .;
k 2 3

k¼0
X m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 þ . . .
k¼0

Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n ¼ 5; m ¼ 3; n [ m


Xn
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k
k 2

k¼0

þ P3 ðsÞ  k3 þ P4 ðsÞ  k4 þ P5 ðsÞ  k5


P0 ¼ 0; P1 ¼ B1 ; P2 ¼ H2 þ B2 ; P3 ¼ H3 þ B3 ; P4 ¼ H4 þ B4 ; P5 ¼ H5
X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 þ q3 ðsÞ  k3 ;
k¼0
q0 ðsÞ ¼ C0 ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ A1 þ C1 ; q2 ðsÞ ¼ A2 þ C2
q3 ðsÞ ¼ A3 :

The homogeneous system for X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRS leads to a characteristic equation
P5
for the eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ aj 
j¼0
P
3
k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j . The coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on
j¼0
94 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

qi ; qk and delay s. qi ; qk are any Schottky detector’s global parameters, other


parameters kept as a constant.

a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ B1 ; a2 ¼ H2 þ B2 ; a3 ¼ H3 þ B3
a4 ¼ H4 þ B4 ; a5 ¼ H5 ; c0 ðsÞ ¼ C0 ;
c1 ðsÞ ¼ A1 þ C1 ; c2 ðsÞ ¼ A2 þ C2 ; c3 ðsÞ ¼ A3 :

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, and cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous,
and differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ ; that is, k = 0 is not of PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0.
Furthermore, P(k), Q(k) are analytic functions of k, for which the following
requirements of the analysis (Kuang J and Cong Y 2005; Kuang Y 1993) can also
be verified in the present case:
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R, then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of F(x) = 0 is continuous and differentiable with
respect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ cannot have common imaginary roots.
That is for any real number x;

pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0:
X
4
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ B1  i  x þ ðHl þ Bl Þ  ði  xÞl þ H5  ði  xÞ5
l¼2
X
4
¼ i  x  B1 þ ðHl þ Bl Þ  il  xl þ i  H5  x5
l¼2
X
4
ðHl þ Bl Þ  il  xl ¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x3  i
l¼2
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4
þ i  ½x  B1  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x3 þ H5  x5 
X
2
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ C0 þ ðAl þ Cl Þ  ði  xÞl  i  A3  x3 ;
l¼1
X
2
ðAl þ Cl Þ  ði  xÞl ¼ i  x  ðA1 þ C1 Þ  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2
l¼1
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2 þ i  ½x  ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3  x3 
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 95

pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ
¼ C0  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2
þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4 þ i  ½x  B1 þ x  ðA1 þ C1 Þ
 ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x3  A3  x3 þ H5  x5  6¼ 0

pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ
¼ C0  ðH2 þ B2 þ A2 þ C2 Þ  x2
þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4 þ i  ½x  ðA1 þ C1 þ B1 Þ
 ðH2 þ B2 þ A3 Þ  x3 þ H5  x5  6¼ 0

jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ ½ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4 2


þ ½x  B1  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x3 þ H5  x5 2
¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ2  x4 þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ2  x8
 2  ðH2 þ B2 Þ2  x6 þ x2  B21  B1  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4
þ B1  H5  x6  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  B1  x4
þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ2  x6  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  H5  x8 þ H5  B1  x6
 H5  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x8 þ H25  x10

jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x2  B21 þ ½ðH2 þ B2 Þ  2  B1   ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4


þ ½2  B1  H5  ðH2 þ B2 Þ2   x6 þ ½ðH2 þ B2 Þ  2  H5   ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x8 þ H25  x10

jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ ½C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2 2 þ ½x  ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3  x3 2 ¼ C02 þ ðA2 þ C2 Þ2  x4


 2  C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2 þ x2  ðA1 þ C1 Þ2 þ A23  x6  2  ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3  x4

jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ C02 þ ½ðA1 þ C1 Þ2  2  C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2


þ ½ðA2 þ C2 Þ2  2  ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3   x4 þ A23  x6

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x2  B21


þ ½ðH2 þ B2 Þ  2  B1   ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4
þ ½2  B1  H5  ðH2 þ B2 Þ2   x6 þ ½ðH2 þ B2 Þ
 2  H5   ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x8 þ H25  x10
 fC02 þ ½ðA1 þ C1 Þ2  2  C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2
þ ½ðA2 þ C2 Þ2  2  ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3   x4 þ A23  x6 g
96 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ C02


þ fB21  ½ðA1 þ C1 Þ2  2  C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þg  x2
þ f½ðH2 þ B2 Þ  2  B1   ðH2 þ B2 Þ
 ½ðA2 þ C2 Þ2  2  ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3 g  x4
þ f½2  B1  H5  ðH2 þ B2 Þ2   A23 g  x6
þ ½ðH2 þ B2 Þ  2  H5   ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x8 þ H25  x10

We define the following parameters for simplicity: P0 ; P2 ; P4 ; P6 ; P8 ; P10

P0 ¼ C02 ; P2 ¼ B21  ½ðA1 þ C1 Þ2  2  C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ


P4 ¼ ½ðH2 þ B2 Þ  2  B1   ðH2 þ B2 Þ  ½ðA2 þ C2 Þ2  2  ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3 
P6 ¼ ½2  B1  H5  ðH2 þ B2 Þ2   A23 ; P8
¼ ½ðH2 þ B2 Þ  2  H5   ðH2 þ B2 Þ; P10 ¼ H25

P
5
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies P2k  x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial.
PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4
PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  B1  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x3 þ H5  x5 ;
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3  x3

Hence

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2
PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2

We use different parameters terminology from our last characteristics parameters


definition: k ! j; pk ðsÞ ! aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 5; m ¼ 3; n [ m
P
5
Additionally Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! QðkÞ Then PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼
j¼0
P
3
cj  k j
j¼0
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 97

Pk ¼ a0 þ a1  k þ a2  k2 þ a3  k3 þ a4  k4 þ a5  k5 ;
Qk ¼ c0 þ c1  k þ c2  k2 þ c3  k3
n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m and aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable func-
tion of s such that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0. In the following “—” denotes complex and con-
jugate. PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s.
The coefficients faj ðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . .Þ and cj ðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ;
CP ; Rj ; s; . . .Þg 2 R depend on RFID TAG detector system’s LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ;
CP ; Rj ; s; . . . values. Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied argu-
ments: ðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . .Þ will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj,
cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their ar-
guments, and direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; a0 ¼ 0; c0 ðsÞ ¼ C0
C0 ¼ r2  w3  r3  r5  w5  w1  r4  r7
! r2  w3  r3  r5  w5  w1  r4  r7 6¼ 0:
R2 1 1
 ½ in     w3
L1  LP C1  LP CP  LP
R2in Rin 1 1
þ   w5  w1   6¼ 0
L1  LP L1 CP  LP RS  CP
8 LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . . 2 R þ

i.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root of the characteristic equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; QðkÞ are
analytic functions of k for which the following requirements of the analysis (see
Kuang 1993, Sect. 3.4) can also be verified in the present case [6, 7].
(a) If k ¼ i  x, x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0, i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
ðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . .Þ domain of interest.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
Indeed, in the limit:
QðkÞ c 0 þ c 1  k þ c 2  k2 þ c 3  k3
j j¼j j
PðkÞ a0 þ a1  k þ a2  k2 þ a3  k3 þ a4  k4 þ a5  k5

(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ;


X
5
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ P2k  x2k
k¼0

Has at most a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x (Degree


in x10 ).
(d) Each positive root xðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . .Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continu-
ous and differentiable with respect to LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . ..
98 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

The condition can only be assessed numerically.


In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have
Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ thus, x [ 0 maybe on eigenvalue
of characteristic equations. The analysis consists in identifying the roots of the
characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane,
whereby increasing the parameters LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . ., Rek may, at the
crossing, change its sign from (−) to (+), i.e. from a stable focus E ð0Þ ðX ð0Þ ;
ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ
Y ð0Þ ; IL1 ; IRj ; IRS Þj VðtÞj ¼ A þ f ðtÞ  A ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0; 0Þ to an unstable
A0 jf ðtÞj 0 0
dVðtÞ df ðtÞ
dt jA0 jf ðtÞj ¼ dt !e
A0 ! e
one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of
the partial derivatives with respect to LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . . and gate
antenna parameters.
@Rek
^1 ðLP Þ ¼ ð Þ ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . . ¼ const;
@LP k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðL1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; LP ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . . ¼ const
@L1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðCf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; LP ; L1 ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . . ¼ const;
@Cf k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðRin Þ ¼ ð Þ ; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Rin k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðRin Þ ¼ ð Þ ; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . . ¼ const;
@Rin k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðRs Þ ¼ ð Þ ; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Rs k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðCP Þ ¼ ð Þ ; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; Rj ; s; . . . ¼ const;
@CP k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðRj Þ ¼ ð Þ ; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Rj k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . . ¼ const; x 2 R þ :
@s k¼ix

When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, and
inserting k ¼ i  x into active RFID Schottky detector system’s characteristic
equation x must satisfy the following:
PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin ðx  sÞ ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos ðx  sÞ ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 99

Where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above sin x  s and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and
adding the sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note: FðxÞ is dependent on s. Now it is important to notice that if s 62 I (assume
that I R þ 0 is the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for, s 62 I , xðsÞ is
not defined. Then for all s in I xðsÞ is satisfied that Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0). Then there are no
positive xðsÞ solutions for Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have stability switches. For
s 2 I where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, we can define the angle
hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of

sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . .;


PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼ ;
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼  :
jQði  xÞj2

And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R ;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that is continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . . indicate the corre-
sponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on ^ðxÞ, remember in
kðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . .Þ and xðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . .Þ, and keeping
all parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in reference
[BK]. Differentiating RFID TAG detector system characteristic equation
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and inverting the
derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark

x ¼ LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . .; etc:;

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ
Where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . .: etc., substituting k ¼ i  x and bearing Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ;
Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ; i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ and that
on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains:

@k 1 i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þ jk¼ix ¼ ð Þ
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ;


Q ¼ QR þ i  QI
100 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ;


Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I :

When (x) can be any RFID Schottky detector parameter’s LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; . . . and
time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments ði  x; xÞ,
and where

Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ


Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þxx ¼ Fx =Fx :

We define U and V:

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ;


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = s.

QI ¼ x  ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3  x3
PR ¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4 ; PI ¼ x  B1  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x3 þ H5  x5 ;
QR ¼ C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2
PRx ¼ 4  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x3  2  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x ¼ 2  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x  ð2  x2  1Þ
PIx ¼ B1  3  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 þ 5  H5  x4 ;
QRx ¼ 2  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x; QIx ¼ ðA1 þ C1 Þ  3  A3  x2
PRs ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0; QRs ¼ 0; QIs ¼ 0; xs ¼ Fs =Fx
PRx  PR ¼ 2  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x  ð2  x2  1Þ  ½ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x4  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 
¼ 2  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x  ð2  x2  1Þ  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2  ½x2  1
¼ 2  ðH2 þ B2 Þ2  x3  ð2  x2  1Þ  ½x2  1
PRx  PR ¼ 2  ðH2 þ B2 Þ2  x3  ð2  x2  1Þ  ½x2  1;
QRx  QR ¼ 2  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x  ½C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2 
Fs ¼ 2  ½ðPRs  PR þ PIs  PI Þ  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þ ¼ 0;
PR  PIx ¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2  ðx2  1Þ  ½B1  3  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 þ 5  H5  x4 
PI  PRx ¼ 2  x2  ½B1  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 þ H5  x4   ðH2 þ B2 Þ  ð2  x2  1Þ:
QR  QIx ¼ ½C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2   ½ðA1 þ C1 Þ  3  A3  x2 ;
QI  QRx ¼ 2  x2  ½ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3  x2   ðA2 þ C2 Þ
V ¼ ðPR  PIs  PI  PRs Þ  ðQR  QIs  QI  QRs Þ ¼ 0: Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 101

Differentiating with respect to s and we get

@x @x Fs @Rek @x Fs
Fx  þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) ¼  ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; ¼ xs ¼ 
@s @s Fx @s k¼ix @s Fx
2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx @Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g; signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g
Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj 2 @s k¼ix
@x U  @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  signfs  þxþ g:
@s jPj2

We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcations)


RFID TAG detector system, about the equilibrium point E ð0Þ ðX ð0Þ ; Y ð0Þ ;
ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ
IL1 ; IRj ; IRS Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0; 0Þ as a result of a variation of delay parameter s. The
analysis consists in identifying the roots of our system characteristic equation sit-
uated on the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane.
Where by increasing the delay parameter s, Re k may at the crossing, changes its
sign from − to +, i.e. from a stable focus E(*) to an unstable one, or vice versa. This
feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with
respect to s,
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . . ¼ const; x 2 R þ :
@s k¼ix
U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ
¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2  ðx2  1Þ  ½B1  3  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 þ 5  H5  x4 
 2  x2  ½B1  ðH2 þ B2 Þ  x2 þ H5  x4   ðH2 þ B2 Þ  ð2  x2  1Þ
 ½C0  ðA2 þ C2 Þ  x2   ½ðA1 þ C1 Þ  3  A3  x2 
 2  x2  ½ðA1 þ C1 Þ  A3  x2   ðA2 þ C2 Þ

The single diode detector, RL is the video load resistance which not seen in
RFID TAG receiver detector equivalent circuit. L1, the shunt inductance, provides a
current return path for the diode, and is chosen to be large compared to diode
impedance at the input or RF frequency. C1, the bypass capacitance, is chosen to be
sufficiently large that is capacitive reactance is small compared to the diode
impedance, but small enough to avoid having it resistance load the video circuit. Pin
is the RF input power applied to the detector circuit and VO is the output voltage
appearing across RL. LP is packaged parasitic inductance (Schottky linear equiva-
lent circuit). CP is package parasitic capacitance. RS is the diode’s parasitic series
resistance. Cj is junction parasitic capacitance, and Rj is the diode’s junction
resistance. LP, CP, and RL are constants. RS has some small variation with tem-
perature, but that variation is not a significant parameter in this analysis. Cj is a
function of both temperature and DC bias, but this analysis concerns itself with the
102 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

zero bias detectors and the variation with temperature is not significant. Rj is a key
element in equivalent circuit—its behavior clearly will affect the performance of the
detector circuit. For our stability switching analysis, we choose typical Schottky
detector parameter values: LP = 2 nH, RS = 1.5 X, CP = 0.08 pF, Cj = 0.2 pF,
Rj = 500 X, RL = 100 KX, Rin = 1 KX, L1 = 1 mH, C1 = 1 lF

r1 ¼ 5  1011 ; r2 ¼ 6:2492  1021 ; r3 ¼ 5  1017 ;


r4 ¼ 6:25  1021 ; r5 ¼ 106 ; r6 ¼ 1010
r7 ¼ 8:33  1012 ; r8 ¼ 3:33  1012 ; r9 ¼ 1:155  1013 ;
w1 ¼ 1016 ; w2 ¼ 1:0001  1010
w3 ¼ 8:22  1028 ; w4 ¼ 8:2212  1022 ; w5 ¼ 8:22  1022 ;
H2 ¼ 5  1027 ; H3 ¼ 5:0005  1021
H4 ¼ 5:1  1011 ; H5 ¼ 1; A1 ¼ 6:2497  1037 ;
A2 ¼ 6:2498  1031 ; A3 ¼ 6:2492  1021
B1 ¼ 4:11  1040 ; B2 ¼ 4:1106  1034 ;
B3 ¼ 5:8572  1024 ; B4 ¼ 1:155  1013
C0 ¼ 6:8997  1048 ; C1 ¼ 6:9178  1042 ;
C2 ¼ 2:0116  1034 ; P0 ¼ 4:7606  1097
P2 ¼ 4:8132  1085 ; P4 ¼ 3:3789  1075 ;
P6 ¼ 1:6897  1069 ; P8 ¼ 1:6897  1069 ; P10 ¼ 1

Then we get the expression for Fðx; sÞ Schottky diode detector parameter
values. We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,
complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001. . .10, we can
be express by 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We plot the stability switch diagram based
on different delay values of our Schottky diode detector.

@Rek 2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@s Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 
@Rek 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2

The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally, when all Schottky diode detector’s
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 103

parameters are known and the stability switch due to various time delay values s is
described in the following expression:

signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx ðxðsÞ; sÞg  signfs  xs ðxðsÞÞ


UðxðsÞÞ  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ VðxðsÞÞ
þ xðsÞ þ g
jPðxðsÞÞj2

Remark we know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies its roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which give complex xi or
imaginary number, then unable to analyze stability [6, 7]. F function is independent
on s the parameter FðxÞ ¼ 0.
The results: We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore
negative, complex, and imaginary values of x. We define new MATLAB script
parameters: p2k ! G2k (k = 0…5). Running a MATLAB script to find x values,
gives the following results:
FðxÞ ¼ 0 ) x1 ¼ 1:0e þ 034 ; x2 ¼ 0 þ 4:1106i;
x3 ¼ 0  4:1106i; x4 ; . . .; x11 ¼ 0

MATLAB script: G0 = −4.7606 * 1e97; G2 = −4.8132 * 1e85;


G4 = -3.3789 * 1e75; G6 = −1.6897 * 1e69; G8 = 1.6897 * 1e69; G10 = 1;
p = [G10 0 G8 0 G6 0 G4 0 G2 0 G0]; r = roots(p).
Next is to find those x, s values which fulfil sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; sinðx  sÞ ¼
PR QI þ PI QR
jQj2
and cos hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cosðx  sÞ ¼  ðPR QRjQjþ2PI QI Þ ; jQj2 ¼ Q2R þ Q2I .
Finally, we plot the stability switch diagram
@Rek
gðsÞ ¼ ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s k¼ix
@Rek 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
gðsÞ ¼ ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2
@Rek
sign½gðsÞ ¼ sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ sign½ð Þ 
@s k¼ix
2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
¼ sign½ 
Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2

Since Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2 [ 0 then


104 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signfFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg


Fs
sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx   ½ðV þ x  P2 Þ   ðU þ s  P2 Þg;
Fx
Fs @x @F=@x
xs ¼  ; xs ¼ ð Þ1 ¼ 
Fx @s @F=@s
sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx   ½V þ xs  U þ x  P2 þ xs  s  P2 g;
1 V þ xs  U
sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx   ½ 2   ½ þ x þ xs  sg
P P2
1 V þ xs  U
sign½ 2  [ 0 ) sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx   ½ þ x þ xs  sg
P P2
V þ xs  U
sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ sign½Fx   sign½ þ x þ xs  s;
P2
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ

We check the sign of ^1 ðsÞ according the following rule:

sign½Fx  sign½V þPx2 s U þ x þ xs  s sign½^1 ðsÞ


± ± +
±  –

If sign[K−1(s)] > 0 then the crossing proceeds from (−) to (+) respectively
(stable to unstable). If sign[K−1(s)] < 0 then the crossing proceeds from (+) to (−)
respectively (unstable to stable). Anyway the stability switching can occur only for
x = 1:0e þ 034 or x = 0 [30, 32].

1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under


Delayed Internal Diode Circuitry Parasitic Effects
in Time

There are systems which converting Radio Frequency (RF) energy into a Direct
Current (DC). In other areas, the circuit has been used to provide DC power to
operate remote autonomous devices that have no on-board power supply. In the
case of the part, a battery controlled by the burst switch is used to power the device.
CMOS (silicon) devices are equipped with a form of sleep circuitry with a current
draw at a minimum during sleep. An external input signal is used to wake-up the
device. The use of the switch requires considerably more design and analysis to
avoid false wake-up states and to ensure functionality under adverse conditions.
A simple generic burst switch is constructed from input RFID rectangular spiral
antenna, matching network, voltage doubler and load. The voltage doubler unit is
constructed from two diodes D1 and D2 with parasitic effects, delay in time. One of
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 105

Fig. 1.23 A simple generic RFID burst switch diagram

the difficulties with the simple RF wake-up circuit is that spurious RF energy
(noise) could potentially waken the sleeping device. Thus, it may be necessary to
interface a low power or passive circuit (essentially a filter) between the RF switch
and the higher power consuming receiver. Spurious RF energy is presented in our
system as delay RFID antenna voltage and voltage derivative in time. The low
power circuit (filter) could be any low-power device that can be turned on for a
short period of time, increment a counter(s) and go back to sleep. In effect, this
device acts like a receiver. A watchdog timer may be used to reset the device after
extended noisy periods or after long intervals of inactivity. VA is the voltage on the
RFID rectangular spiral antenna.

dVðtÞ dVA ðtÞ


VðtÞ ¼ VA ðtÞ; ¼
dt dt
dV1 ðtÞ
We define: V1 ðtÞ ¼ VðtÞ; V2 ðtÞ ¼ dVðtÞ
dt ¼ dt . Tau1 (s1 ) and Tau2 (s2 ) delay
lines represent our diodes D1 and D1 parasitic effect delay In time, Vs1 ; Vs2 ! e
(Fig. 1.23)

ID1 ðtÞ ! ID1 ðt  s1 Þ; ID2 ðtÞ ! ID2 ðt  s2 Þ:

RFID burst switch matching network design: The matching network match
between RFID rectangular spiral antenna impedance to our load impedance. First,
we need to calculate our matching network input impedance Zin [85] (Fig. 1.24).
Rectangular spiral RFID antenna length calculation and Inductance/resistance
We have the following rectangular spiral RFID antenna and first we need to
calculate the total length.
106 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Aavg

A0

w B0 Bavg

A0, B0—Overall dimensions of the coil. Aavg, Bavg—Average dimensions of


the coil. w—Track width, g—Gap between tracks, t—Track thickness, Average coil

Fig. 1.24 A simple generic RFID burst switch equivalent circuit


1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 107

area: Ac = Aavg∙Bavg. Nc—Number of turns. L0 is the length of the first turn


l0 ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðw þ gÞ. lk is the length of turn k + 1 [7, 8].

k ¼ 1 ) L1 ¼ A0  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  2  ðw þ gÞ þ A0  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  3  ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 2 ) L2 ¼ A0  3  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ þ A0  4  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  5  ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 3 ) L3 ¼ A0  5  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  6  ðw þ gÞ þ A0  6  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  7  ðw þ gÞ
X
N c 1

LT ¼ L0 þ fA0  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞg

X
N c 1

fA0  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞg
NX
C 1

¼ f2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  8  k  ðw þ gÞg
k¼1
NX
C 1

¼2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ  4  k  ðw þ gÞg


k¼1
NX
C 1

¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðNC  1Þ  2  ½4  k  ðw þ gÞ


k¼1
NX
C 1 NX
C 1

¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðNC  1Þ  8  ðw þ gÞ  k; k ¼ NC  1
k¼1 k¼1

X
N c 1

fA0  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞg
¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðNC  1Þ  8  ðw þ gÞ  ðNC  1Þ
¼ 2  ðNC  1Þ  ½A0 þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ

LT ¼ L0 þ 2  ðNC  1Þ  ½A0 þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ


 ½A0 þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðw þ gÞ
¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC  1Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½1 þ 8  ðNC  1Þ
¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  NC  ðw þ gÞ  ð8  NC  7Þ

Final result: LT ¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  NC  ðw þ gÞ  ð8  NC  7Þ


108 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðw þ gÞ þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  NC  ðw þ gÞ  ð8  NC  7Þ
LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½1 þ 8  NC  7
LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½8  NC  6
LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3
LT ¼ 2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3g

The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna:

LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2

LT—total length of the wire. r—conductivity of the wire (mohm/m). S—Cross


section area p  a2 . a—radius of the wire.

LT LT 2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2 r  p  a2
LT LT 2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3g
RDC jS¼wt ¼ ¼ ¼
rS rpwt rpwt

l0 X
4
2  Aavg  Bavg
Lcalc ¼ ð Xk  X3 Þ  NcP ; X1 ¼ Aavg  lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ
p k¼1;k6¼3 d  ðA þ A2 þ B2 Þ
avg avg avg

2  Aavg  Bavg
X2 ¼ Bavg  lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ;
d  ðBavg þ A2avg þ B2avg Þ
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ðAavg þ Bavg Þ
X3 ¼ 2  ðAavg þ Bavg  A2avg þ B2avg Þ; X4 ¼
4
2  ðt þ wÞ
d¼ ; Aavg ¼ A0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ; Bavg ¼ B0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ
p
x—Angular frequency.

Zant ¼ RDC þ j  x  Lcalc ; Zin ¼ Zant k Zc1 þ j  x  L1


Zant  Zc1 1
¼ þ j  x  L1 ; Zc1 ¼
Zant þ Zc1 j  x  C1
ðRDC þ j  x  Lcalc Þ  jxC
1
Zin ¼ 1
þ j  x  L1
RDC þ j  x  Lcalc þ jxC 1
1

RDC þ j  x  Lcalc
¼ þ j  x  L1
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1  þ j  x  C1  RDC
RDC þ j  x  Lcalc
Zin ¼
½1  x  Lcalc  C1  þ j  x  C1  RDC
2

½1  x2  Lcalc  C1   j  x  C1  RDC
 þ j  x  L1
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1   j  x  C1  RDC
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 109

RDC  ½1  x2  Lcalc  C1   j  x  C1  R2DC þ j  x  Lcalc  ½1  x2  Lcalc  C1  þ x2  Lcalc  C1  RDC


Zin ¼ þ j  x  L1
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1 2 þ x2  C12  R2DC
RDC  ½1  x  Lcalc  C1  þ x  Lcalc  C1  RDC þ j  x  fLcalc  ½1  x  Lcalc  C1   C1 
2 2 2
R2DC g
Zin ¼ þ j  x  L1
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1 2 þ x2  C12  R2DC
RDC  ½1  x2  Lcalc  C1  þ x2  Lcalc  C1  RDC
Zin ¼
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1 2 þ x2  C12  R2DC
fLcalc  ½1  x2  Lcalc  C1   C1  R2DC g
þj  x  þ j  x  L1
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1 2 þ x2  C12  R2DC
RDC  ½1  x  Lcalc  C1  þ x  Lcalc  C1  RDC
2 2
Zin ¼
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1 2 þ x2  C12  R2DC
fLcalc  ½1  x2  Lcalc  C1   C1  R2DC g
þj  x  ½ þ L1 
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1 2 þ x2  C12  R2DC
RDC  ½1  x2  Lcalc  C1  þ x2  Lcalc  C1  RDC
A1 ¼ ;
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1 2 þ x2  C12  R2DC
fLcalc  ½1  x2  Lcalc  C1   C1  R2DC g
B1 ¼ x  ½ þ L1 
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1 2 þ x2  C12  R2DC
Zin ¼ A1 þ j  B1

If we neglect voltage doubler unit’s parasitic elements (Inductance, capacitance,


and resistances) then it is transparent and the load is connected directly to a
matching unit.

jxCload  RL
1
RL
Zload ¼ ¼
jxCload þ RL
1 1 þ j  x  Cload  RL
RL ð1  j  x  Cload  RL Þ
¼ 
1 þ j  x  Cload  RL ð1  j  x  Cload  RL Þ

RL ð1  j  x  Cload  RL Þ RL  j  x  Cload  RL  RL
Zload ¼  ¼
1 þ j  x  Cload  RL ð1  j  x  Cload  RL Þ 1 þ x2  Cload
2  R2L
RL x  Cload  RL  RL
Zload ¼ j
1 þ x  Cload  RL
2 2 2 1 þ x2  Cload
2  R2L

RL x  Cload  RL  RL
A2 ¼ ; B2 ¼ ; Zload ¼ A2  j  B2
1 þ x2  Cload  RL
2 2 1 þ x2  Cload
2  R2L

If Zin ¼ Zload (complex conjugate) then maximum power is transferred from the
RFID rectangular spiral antenna to the load (no power reflections). For perfect
match A1 = A2 and B1 = B2.

RDC  ½1  x2  Lcalc  C1  þ x2  Lcalc  C1  RDC RL


A1 ¼ A2 ) ¼
½1  x2 Lcalc  C1   2
þ x2
 R2DC C12 1 þ x2  Cload
2  R2L
fLcalc  ½1  x2  Lcalc  C1   C1  R2DC g x  Cload  RL  RL
B1 ¼ B2 ) x  ½ þ L1  ¼
½1  x2  Lcalc  C1 2 þ x2  C12  R2DC 1 þ x2  Cload
2  R2L
110 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Remark our matching is dependent on the angular frequency value, x = 2pf.


Stability analysis: we need to write our system, differential equations and ana-
lyze our system behavior under parameter variation.

IRDC ¼ ILcalc ; ILcalc ¼ I1 þ I2 ; I1 ¼ IC1 ; I2 ¼ IL1 ;


I2 ¼ I3 þ I4 ; I4 ¼ ID2 ; I3 ¼ ID1 ; I4 ¼ I5 þ I6
VC
I5 ¼ ICload ; I6 ¼ IRL ¼ ; VC1 ¼ VðtÞ; VL1 ¼ VA  VB ;
RL
VD2 ¼ VB  VC ; VB ¼ VD1 ; VC ¼ VCload ¼ VRL
dVðtÞ
VA ¼ VC1 ; VA ¼ VðtÞ ¼ VLcalc þ VRDC ; IC1 ¼ C1  ;
dt
dVC dIL
ICload ¼ Cload  ; VL1 ¼ L1  1
dt dt
dILcalc
VLcalc ¼ Lcalc  ; VRDC ¼ RDC  IRDC ;
dt
ID ID
VD1 ¼ Vt  ln½ 1 þ 1; VD2 ¼ Vt  ln½ 2 þ 1
I0 I0
dVðtÞ dIL
ILcalc ¼ I1 þ I2 ; ILcalc ¼ C1  þ IL1 ; VL1 ¼ L1  1 ;
dt dt
VL1 ¼ VA  VB ¼ VLcalc þ ILcalc  RDC þ VD1
ID
VL1 ¼ VLcalc þ ILcalc  RDC þ Vt  ln½ 1 þ 1
I0
dIL1 dILcalc ID
) L1  ¼ Lcalc  þ ILcalc  RDC þ Vt  ln½ 1 þ 1
dt dt I0
dIL1 d dVðtÞ
L1  ¼ Lcalc  ½C1  þ IL1 
dt dt dt
dVðtÞ ID
þ ½C1  þ IL1   RDC þ Vt  ln½ 1 þ 1
dt I0
dIL1 d 2 VðtÞ dIL1
L1  ¼ Lcalc  C1  þ Lcalc 
dt dt2 dt
dVðtÞ ID
þ C1  RDC  þ IL1  RDC þ Vt  ln½ 1 þ 1
dt I0
dIL1 d 2 VðtÞ dIL1
L1  ¼ Lcalc  C1  þ Lcalc 
dt dt2 dt
dVðtÞ ID
þ C1  RDC  þ IL1  RDC þ Vt  ln½ 1 þ 1
dt I0

dIL1 d 2 VðtÞ dVðtÞ


ð Þ½L1  Lcalc   ¼ Lcalc  C1  2
þ C1  RDC  þ IL1  RDC þ Vt
dt dt dt
ID
 ln½ 1 þ 1
I0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 111

I2 ¼ I3 þ I4 ) IL1 ¼ ID1 þ ID2 ; VD2 ¼ VB  VC ¼ VD1  VCload ;


ID ID
VCload ¼ VC ; Vt  ln½ 2 þ 1 ¼ Vt  ln½ 1 þ 1  VCload
I0 I0
dVC VC
I4 ¼ I5 þ I6 ) ID2 ¼ Cload  þ ;
dt RL
dIL dID1 dID2
IL1 ¼ ID1 þ ID2 ) 1 ¼  þ
dt dt dt
ID2 ID1 ID ID
Vt  ln½ þ 1 ¼ Vt  ln½ þ 1  VCload ) Vt  ln½ 2 þ 1 ¼ Vt  ln½ 1 þ 1  VC
I0 I0 I0 I0
ID2 ID1 ID1 ID
Vt  ln½ þ 1 ¼ Vt  ln½ þ 1  VC ) VC ¼ Vt  ln½ þ 1  Vt  ln½ 2 þ 1
I0 I0 I0 I0

dVC 1 1 dID1 1 1 dID2


¼ Vt  ID    V t  ID  
dt ½ þ 1 0
1 I
I0
dt ½ þ 1 0 dt
2 I
I0
dVC 1 dID1 1 dID2
) ¼ Vt    Vt  
dt ½ID1 þ I0  dt ½ID2 þ I0  dt

1 dID1 1 dID2
ð ÞID2 ¼ Cload  fVt    Vt   g
½ID1 þ I0  dt ½ID2 þ I0  dt
1 ID ID
þ  fVt  ln½ 1 þ 1  Vt  ln½ 2 þ 1g
RL I0 I0

dIL1 d 2 VðtÞ dVðtÞ


ð Þ½L1  Lcalc   ¼ Lcalc  C1  þ C1  RDC 
dt dt2 dt
ID1
þ IL1  RDC þ Vt  ln½ þ 1
I0

dID1 dID2 d 2 VðtÞ dVðtÞ


½L1  Lcalc   ½ þ  ¼ Lcalc  C1  þ C1  RDC 
dt dt dt2 dt
ID1
þ ½ID1 þ ID2   RDC þ Vt  ln½ þ 1
I0

We define the following new variables:

dID2 dID1 dVðtÞ dZ d 2 VðtÞ


X¼ ;Y ¼ ;Z ¼ ; ¼
dt dt dt dt dt2
dZ
½L1  Lcalc   ½Y þ X ¼ Lcalc  C1  þ C1  RDC  Z
dt
ID
þ ½ID1 þ ID2   RDC þ Vt  ln½ 1 þ 1
I0
112 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

1 1
ð ÞID2 ¼ Cload  fVt   Y  Vt   Xg
½ID1 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0 
1 ID ID
þ  fVt  ln½ 1 þ 1  Vt  ln½ 2 þ 1g
RL I0 I0

Cload  Vt Cload  Vt Vt ID ID
ID2 ¼  Y   X   fln½ 1 þ 1 þ ln½ 2 þ 1g
½ID1 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0  RL I0 I0
Cload  Vt Cload  Vt Vt ID ID
ID2 ¼  Y   X   lnf½ 1 þ 1  ½ 2 þ 1g
½ID1 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0  RL I0 I0
Cload  Vt Cload  Vt Vt ID1 ID 2
 X ¼ ID2   Y   lnf½ þ 1  ½ þ 1g
½ID2 þ I0  ½ID1 þ I0  RL I0 I0
ID  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID þ I0  ID ID
X¼ 2  Y  2  lnf½ 1 þ 1  ½ 2 þ 1g
Cload  Vt ½ID1 þ I0  RL  Cload I0 I0
dID2 dID2 ID2  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0 
X¼ ) ¼ 
dt dt Cload  Vt ½ID1 þ I0 
½ID þ I0  ID ID
Y  2  lnf½ 1 þ 1  ½ 2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

dZ
ð Þ½L1  Lcalc   ½Y þ X ¼ Lcalc  C1  þ C1  RDC  Z
dt
ID1
þ ½ID1 þ ID2   RDC þ Vt  ln½ þ 1
I0

dZ
Lcalc  C1  ¼ ½L1  Lcalc   ½Y þ X  C1  RDC  Z
dt
ID
 ½ID1 þ ID2   RDC  Vt  ln½ 1 þ 1
I0
dZ ½L1  Lcalc  RDC
¼  ½Y þ X  Z
dt Lcalc  C1 Lcalc
RDC Vt ID
 ½ID1 þ ID2     ln½ 1 þ 1
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 I0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 113

We can summerize our RFID burst switch system, differential equations:

dZ ½L1  Lcalc  RDC


¼  ½Y þ X   Z  ½ID1 þ ID2 
dt Lcalc  C1 Lcalc
RDC Vt ID
   ln½ 1 þ 1
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 I0
dZ ½L1  Lcalc  ID2  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0 
¼  ½Y   Y
dt Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt ½ID1 þ I0 
½ID þ I0  ID ID RDC
 2  lnf½ 1 þ 1  ½ 2 þ 1g  Z
RL  Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
RDC Vt ID
 ½ID1 þ ID2     ln½ 1 þ 1
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 I0
dID2 ID2  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0  ID ID dID
¼  Y   lnf½ 1 þ 1  ½ 2 þ 1g; 1 ¼ Y
dt Cload  Vt ½ID1 þ I0  RL  Cload I0 I0 dt

We have four variables in our system: Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y and we can represent our
dt ¼ n1 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ
system as the following set of differential equations: dZ

dID2 dID
¼ n2 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ; 1 ¼ n3 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ;
dt dt
n1 ¼ n1 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ; n2 ¼ n2 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ
n3 ¼ n3 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ID  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0 
n1 ¼  ½Y  2  Y
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt ½ID1 þ I0 
½ID þ I0  ID ID RDC
 2  lnf½ 1 þ 1  ½ 2 þ 1g  Z
RL  Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
RDC Vt ID
 ½ID1 þ ID2     ln½ 1 þ 1
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 I0
ID2  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0 
n2 ¼   Y
Cload  Vt ½ID1 þ I0 
½ID þ I0  ID ID
 2  lnf½ 1 þ 1  ½ 2 þ 1g; n3 ¼ Y
RL  Cload I0 I0

RFID system burst switch’s voltage doubler unit is constructed from two diodes
D1 and D2 with parasitic effects, delay in time. D1 current delay in time
ID1 ðtÞ ! ID1 ðt  s1 Þ and D2 current delay in time ID2 ðtÞ ! ID2 ðt  s2 Þ.
Spurious RF energy is presented in our system as delay RFID antenna voltage (V
(t)) and voltage derivative (dV(t)/dt) in time. We neglect voltage delayed in time
and consider only voltage derivative delay in time (D).
114 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

dVðtÞ
ZðtÞ ¼ ; ZðtÞ ! Zðt  DÞ
dt
dI dI
dt ¼ dt ; dt . To find equilibrium points (fixed
We consider no delay effects on dZ D1 D2

points) of the RFID system burst switches, we define lim ID1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ID1 ðtÞ
t!1

lim ID2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ID2 ðtÞ; lim Zðt  DÞ ¼ ZðtÞ


t!1 t!1

In equilibrium points (fixed points)

dID1 dID dZ
¼ 0; 2 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 8 t  s1 ; t  s2 ;
dt dt dt
t  D 9 ðt  s1 Þ  t; ðt  s2 Þ  t; ðt  DÞ  t; t ! 1:
dID1 dID I  ½I þ I0 
¼ 0 ) Y ¼ 0; 2 ¼ 0 )  D2 D2
dt dt Cload  Vt

½I þ I0  I I
 D2  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ 0
RL  Cload I0 I0

I  ½I þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0  I I
 D2 D2   lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ 0
Cload  Vt RL  Cload I0 I0
½ID 2 þ I0  ID 2 1 I
I
) ð þ  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1gÞ ¼ 0
Cload Vt RL I0 I0

Case I:

½ID 2 þ I0  dZ
 ¼ 0 ) ID 2 ¼ I0 ) ¼0
Cload dt
RDC Vt I
) ½ID 1 þ I0    RDC  Z   ln½ D1 þ 1 ¼ 0
C1 C1 I0

Case II:

ID 2 1 I I RL I I
þ  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ 0 )  ID2 þ lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ 0
Vt RL I0 I0 Vt I0 I0
ID 1 ID 2 RL R I
I
þ 1g ¼   ID 2 ) e Vt ID2 ¼ ½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1:
L
lnf½ þ 1  ½
I0 I0 Vt I0 I0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 115

Let us define

RL / X 1
/n /2 /3
/¼  ID2 ; e ¼ ¼ 1þ/þ þ þ 
Vt n¼0
n! 2! 3!
RL X
1 ð RL  I Þn
) e Vt ID2 ¼
V D2 t

n¼0
n!
RL X
1 ð RL  ID 2 Þn X
1 ð1Þn  ðRL  I Þn
e Vt ID2 ¼ Vt V D2
¼ t

n¼0
n! n¼0
n!

RL  ID 2 Þ2 ðRVLt  ID 2 Þ3
ðRVLt
¼ 1   ID2 þ  þ 
Vt 2! 3!
 VLt ID
R RL 1 RL 1 RL
e 2 ¼ 1   ID 2 þ  ð Þ2  ðID 2 Þ2   ð Þ3  ðID 2 Þ3 þ   
Vt 2 Vt 6 Vt
R
 VLt ID
For easy investigation, we take e 2 ¼ 1  RVLt  ID 2 ) 1  RVLt  ID 2 ¼
I I
½ ID01 þ 1  ½ ID02 þ 1

 VLt ID
R RL RL I I
e 2 ¼1 ID2 ) 1   ID 2 ¼ ½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1
Vt Vt I0 I0
RL ID 1 ID 2 ID 1  ID 2 ID 1 I RL
1   ID2 ¼ ½ þ 1  ½ þ 1 ) þ þ D2 þ I ¼0
Vt I0 I0 2
I0 I0 I0 Vt D2
dZ ½L1  Lcalc  I  ½ID2 þ I0 
¼0)  ½ D2
dt Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt
½ID 2 þ I0  ID 1 I RDC
  lnf½ þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g  Z
RL  Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
RDC Vt I
 ½ID 1 þ ID 2     ln½ D1 þ 1 ¼ 0
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 I0

Remark Our system, equilibrium points (fixed points) can be calculated numeri-
cally rather than analytically (Case I and Case II). For both cases Y* = 0,
Y* = dID1/dt = 0. At equilibrium no current is flowing through D1, D1 is in OFF
state (VB > 0).
The standard local stability analysis about any one of the equilibrium points of
the RFID system burst switch consists in adding to coordinate ½Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y  ekt and retaining the
first order terms in Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y. The system of three homogeneous equations leads
to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The polynomial char-
acteristic equations accept by set the below currents and currents derivative with
respect to time into RFID system burst switch equations. RFID system burst
switches fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
116 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

½z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y  ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2
(third fixed point), etc.

ZðtÞ ¼ Z ðjÞ þ z  ekt


ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 ðtÞ ¼ ID1 þ iD1  ekt ; ID2 ðtÞ ¼ ID2 þ iD2  ekt ;
ðjÞ
YðtÞ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt ; ID1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ID1 þ iD1  ekðts1 Þ
ðjÞ
ID2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ID2 þ iD2  ekðts2 Þ ; Zðt  DÞ ¼ Z ðjÞ þ z  ekðtDÞ :

We choose these expressions for our ZðtÞ; ID1 ðtÞ; ID2 ðtÞ; YðtÞ as a small dis-
placement ½z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y from the RFID system burst switch fixed points in time
t = 0.
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ ID1 þ iD1 ; ID2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ ID2 þ iD2 ; Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y; Zðt ¼ 0Þ
¼ Z ðjÞ þ z:

For k\0; t [ 0, the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k [ 0; t [ 0 is


unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for k\0; t [ 0
otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k Is the eigenvalue
parameter which is established if the fixed point is stable or unstable; additionally,
his absolute value (jkj) establishes the speed of flow toward or away from the
selected fixed point (Yuri 1995; Jack and Huseyin 1991). The speeds of flow toward or
away from the selected fixed point for RFID system burst switch diodes (D1 and D2)
currents and antenna voltage derivative with respect to time are
dZðtÞ Zðt þ DtÞ  ZðtÞ Z ðjÞ þ z  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½Z ðjÞ þ z  ekt 
¼ lim ¼ lim
dt Dt!1 Dt Dt!1 Dt
ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ ! k  z  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
dID1 ðtÞ ID ðt þ DtÞ  ID1 ðtÞ I þ iD1  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½ID1 þ iD1  ekt 
¼ lim 1 ¼ lim D1
dt Dt!1 Dt Dt!1 Dt
ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ ! k  iD1  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
dID2 ðtÞ ID ðt þ DtÞ  ID2 ðtÞ I þ iD2  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½ID2 þ iD2  ekt 
¼ lim 2 ¼ lim D2
dt Dt!1 Dt Dt!1 Dt
ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ ! k  iD2  ekt
dYðtÞ Yðt þ DtÞ  YðtÞ Y ðjÞ þ y  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt 
¼ lim ¼ lim
dt Dt!1 Dt Dt!1 Dt
ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ ! k  y  ekt
dID1 ðt  s1 Þ dID2 ðt  s2 Þ
¼ k  iD1  ekt  eks1 ; ¼ k  iD2  ekt  eks2 ;
dt dt
dZðt  DÞ
¼ k  z  ekt  ekD
dt
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 117

First, we take RFID system burst switch variable Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y differential equa-
tions and adding to coordinate ½Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential terms ½z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y  ekt and retaining the first order terms in z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y.

dZðtÞ
ZðtÞ ¼ Z ðjÞ þ z  ekt ) ¼ z  k  ekt
dt
dZ ½L1  Lcalc  ID  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0 
¼  ½Y  2  Y
dt Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt ½ID1 þ I0 
½ID þ I0  ID ID RDC
 2  lnf½ 1 þ 1  ½ 2 þ 1g  Z
RL  Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
RDC Vt ID
 ½ID1 þ ID2     ln½ 1 þ 1
LcalcC1 Lcalc  C1 I0

ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðI þ iD2  ekt Þ  ½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0 
z  k  ekt ¼  ½ðY ðjÞ þ y  ekt Þ  D2
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt
ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0 
 ðjÞ
 ðY ðjÞ þ y  ekt Þ
½ID1 þ iD1  ekt þ I0 
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0  I þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
RDC
  ðZ ðjÞ þ z  ekt Þ
Lcalc
ðjÞ ðjÞ RDC
 ½ðID1 þ iD1  ekt Þ þ ID2 þ iD2  ekt  
Lcalc  C1
ðjÞ
Vt I þ iD1  ekt
  ln½ D1 þ 1
Lcalc  C1 I0

½L1  Lcalc 
z  k  ekt ¼  ½ðY ðjÞ þ y  ekt Þ
Lcalc  C1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt þ i2D2  e2kt

Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2  ekt  ½ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt 
 ðjÞ
 ðjÞ  ðY ðjÞ þ y  ekt Þ
kt
½ðID1 þ I0 Þ þ iD1  e  ½ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD1  e  kt

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0  I þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
RDC
  ðZ ðjÞ þ z  ekt Þ
Lcalc
ðjÞ ðjÞ RDC
 ½ID1  iD1  ekt þ ID2 þ iD2  ekt  
Lcalc  C1
ðjÞ
Vt I þ iD1  ekt
  ln½ D1 þ 0
Lcalc  C1 I0
118 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

½L1  Lcalc 
z  k  ekt ¼  ½ðY ðjÞ þ y  ekt Þ
Lcalc  C1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt þ i2D2  e2kt

Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðI þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt  iD2  iD1  e2kt
 f D2 ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2  i2D1  e2kt
 ðY ðjÞ þ y  ekt Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0  I þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
RDC
  ðZ ðjÞ þ z  ekt Þ
Lcalc
ðjÞ ðjÞ RDC
 ½ID1  iD1  ekt þ ID2 þ iD2  ekt  
Lcalc  C1
ðjÞ
Vt I þ iD1  ekt
  ln½ D1 þ 0
Lcalc  C1 I0

We consider i2D1 ! e  0; i2D2 ! e  0; iD2  iD1 ! e  0

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


ID ðID þ I0 Þ þ ID iD2 ekt þ ðID þ I0 ÞiD2 ekt
z  k  ekt ¼ ½LL1calc
Lcalc  ðjÞ kt
C1  ½ðY þ y  e Þ 
2 2 2
Cload Vt
2

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ kt ðjÞ kt


ðID þ I0 ÞðID þ I0 ÞðID þ I0 ÞiD1 e þ ðID þ I0 ÞiD2 e
f 2 1 2
ðjÞ
1
g  ðY ðjÞ þ y  ekt Þ
ðID þ I0 Þ2
ð£Þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
1
ðjÞ
½ID þ iD2 ekt þ I0  I þ iD1 e kt
I þ iD2 ekt
 2
RL Cload  lnf½ D1 I0 þ 1  ½ D2 I0 þ 1g  LRcalc
DC
 ðZ ðjÞ þ z  ekt Þ
ðjÞ
ðjÞ ðjÞ I þ iD1 ekt
½ID1  iD1  ekt þ ID2 þ iD2  ekt   Lcalc
RDC
C1  Lcalc C1  ln½
Vt D1
I0 þ 1

Calculation No. 1:

ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt
lnf½ þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID 1 1 I 1
¼ ln½ð½ þ 1 þ  iD1  ekt Þ  ð½ D2 þ 1 þ  iD2  ekt Þ
I0 I0 I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID 1 I I 1
¼ lnf½ þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1 þ ½ D1 þ 1   iD2  ekt
I0 I0 I0 I0
ðjÞ
ID2 1 1
þ½ þ 1   iD1  ekt þ 2  iD1  iD2  e2kt g
I0 I0 I0
iD1  iD2  0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 119
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1  ekt ID 2 þ iD2  ekt
lnf½ þ 1  ½ þ 1g
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 I I 1 I 1
¼ lnf½ þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1 þ ½ D1 þ 1   iD2  ekt þ ½ D2 þ 1   iD1  ekt g
I0 I0 I0 I0 I0 I0

We define:

ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðjÞ ðjÞ I 1 I 1
X1 ¼ X1 ðID1 ; ID2 ; iD2 ; iD1 ; kÞ ¼ ½ D1 þ 1   iD2  ekt þ ½ D2 þ 1   iD1  ekt
I0 I0 I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
I þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt I I
lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1 þ X1 g
I0 I0 I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt
lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I I X1
¼ lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1  ð1 þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Þg
I0 I0 ID ID
½ I0 þ 1  ½ I0 þ 1
1 2

The above is assuming

ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 I
½ þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1 [ 0
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt
lnf½ þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I I X1
¼ lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g þ lnf1 þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
g
I0 I0 ID ID
½ I0 þ 1  ½ I0 þ 1
1 2

ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID I
X1 ½ I0 þ 1  I10  iD2  ekt þ ½ ID02 þ 1  I10  iD1  ekt
1

ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ ðjÞ ðjÞ
I I I I
½ ID01 þ 1  ½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1  ½ ID02 þ 1
iD2 iD1 1 kt
¼f ðjÞ
þ ðjÞ
g e
ID ID I0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1

x2 x3 x4 X1
xn
lnð1 þ xÞ ¼ x  þ  þ... ¼ ð1Þn þ 1 . . . ) lnð1 þ xÞ  x
2 3 4 n¼1
n
120 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

X1 X1
lnf1 þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
g ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID ID ID I
½ I01 þ 1  ½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1  ½ ID02 þ 1
iD2 iD1 1 kt
¼f ðjÞ
þ ðjÞ
g e
ID ID I0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1

ðjÞ ðjÞ
I þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt
lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I I iD iD 1
¼ lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g þ f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
I0 I0 I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1

Calculation No. 2:

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0  I þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt
 lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0  I I iD iD 1
¼  ðlnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g þ f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt Þ
RL  Cload I0 I0 I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0  I þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt
 lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2 þ I0 iD  ekt I I iD iD 1
¼f þ 2 g  ðlnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g þ f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt Þ
RL  Cload RL  Cload I0 I0 ID ID I0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ I I ðI þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
¼  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g þ D2  f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
RL  Cload I0 I0 RL  Cload ID ID I 0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt I I e2kt iD  iD2 iD  iD1
þ  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g þ  f ðjÞ2 þ ðjÞ2 g
RL  Cload I0 I0 RL  Cload  I0 I I
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1
e2kt iD  iD 2 iD  iD1
iD2  iD2  0; iD2  iD1  0 )  f ðjÞ2 þ ðjÞ2 g!e
RL  Cload  I0 ID I
½ I02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 121

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0  I þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt
 lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ I I ðI þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
¼  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g þ D2  f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
RL  Cload I0 I0 RL  Cload ID ID I 0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt I I
þ  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

Calculation No. 3:
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1  ekt I iD  ekt I iD1  ekt
ln½ þ 1 ¼ ln½ð D1 þ 1Þ þ 1  ¼ ln½ð D1 þ 1Þ  f1 þ ðjÞ
g
I0 I0 I0 I0 I
I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1  ekt I iD1  ekt
ln½ þ 1 ¼ lnð D1 þ 1Þ þ lnf1 þ ðjÞ
g
I0 I0 I
I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ
x2 x3 x4 X1
xn
lnð1 þ xÞ ¼ x  þ  þ  ¼ ð1Þn þ 1  ) lnð1 þ xÞ  x
2 3 4 n¼1
n

ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1  ekt I iD1  ekt
ln½ þ 1 ¼ lnð D1 þ 1Þ þ lnf1 þ ðjÞ
g
I0 I0 I
I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ
ID 1 iD1  ekt
¼ lnð þ 1Þ þ ðjÞ
I0 I
I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ

Integrating last results in the next expression:


ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID ðID þ I0 Þ þ ID iD2 ekt þ ðID þ I0 ÞiD2 ekt
z  k  ekt ¼ ½LL1calc
Lcalc  ðjÞ kt
C1  ½ðY þ y  e Þ 
2 2 2
Cload Vt
2

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ kt ðjÞ kt


ðID þ I0 ÞðID þ I0 ÞðID þ I0 ÞiD1 e þ ðID þ I0 ÞiD2 e
f 2 1 2
ðjÞ
1
g  ðY ðjÞ þ y  ekt Þ
ðID þ I0 Þ2
ð£Þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
1
ðjÞ
½ID þ iD2 ekt þ I0  I þ iD1 e kt
I þ iD2 ekt
 2
RL Cload  lnf½ D1 I0 þ 1  ½ D2 I0 þ 1g  LRcalc
DC
 ðZ ðjÞ þ z  ekt Þ
ðjÞ
ðjÞ ðjÞ I þ iD1 ekt
½ID1  iD1  ekt þ ID2 þ iD2  ekt   Lcalc
RDC
C1  Lcalc C1  ln½
Vt D1
I0 þ 1
122 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

½L1  Lcalc 
z  k  ekt ¼  ½ðY ðjÞ þ y  ekt Þ
Lcalc  C1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt

Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
f ðjÞ
g  ðY ðjÞ þ y  ekt Þ
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ I I
f  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
þ  f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
RL  Cload ID ID I 0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt I I RDC
þ  lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þg   ðZ ðjÞ þ z  ekt Þ
RL  Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
ðjÞ ðjÞ RDC
 ½ID1  iD1  ekt þ ID2 þ iD2  ekt  
Lcalc  C1
ðjÞ
Vt I iD1  ekt
  flnð D1 þ 1Þ þ g
Lcalc  C1 I0 I
ðjÞ

I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ

The condition of our system fixed points:

dZ
j ðjÞ ðjÞ ¼0
dt @ID1 ;ID2 ;Y ðjÞ ;Z ðjÞ
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  I  ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðI þ I0 Þ
 ½Y ðjÞ  D2  f DðjÞ2 g  Y ðjÞ
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt ðI þ I0 Þ D1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ ID1 ID2
  lnf½ þ 1  ½ þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ
RDC ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ RDC Vt I
  Z  ½ID1 þ ID2     lnð D1 þ 1Þ ¼ 0
Lcalc Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 I0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 123

ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  I  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
z  k  ekt ¼  ½y  ekt  D2
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ
 ðjÞ
 y  ekt
ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ
þ ðjÞ
 i  ekt  Y ðjÞ þ ðjÞ
2 D1
 iD1  ekt  y  ekt
ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
iD2  ekt  Y ðjÞ iD2  ekt  y  ekt
 ðjÞ
 ðjÞ
ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
  f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
RL  Cload I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt I I
  lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þ
RL  Cload I0 I0
RDC RDC
  z  ekt  ½iD1  ekt þ iD2  ekt  
Lcalc Lcalc  C1
Vt iD1  ekt
 f g
Lcalc  C1 I
ðjÞ

I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ
iD1  y  0 ) ðjÞ
 iD1  ekt  y  ekt ! e;
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
iD2  ekt  y  ekt
iD2  y  0 ) ðjÞ
!e
ðID1 þ I0 Þ

ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  I  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
z  k  ekt ¼  ½y  ekt  D2
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ
 ðjÞ
 y  ekt
ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2  ekt  Y ðjÞ
þ ðjÞ
 iD1  ekt  Y ðjÞ  ðjÞ
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 i D1 1
 f þ g   ekt
RL  Cload ðjÞ
ID
ðjÞ
ID I0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt I I RDC
  lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þ   z  ekt
RL  Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
RDC Vt iD1  ekt
 ½iD1  ekt þ iD2  ekt    f g
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 I
ðjÞ

I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ
124 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

dID2 ID  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID2 þ I0  ½ID þ I0  ID ID


¼ 2  Y  2  lnf½ 1 þ 1  ½ 2 þ 1g
dt Cload  Vt ½ID1 þ I0  RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2  ekt   ½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0 
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0 
 ðjÞ
 ½Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt 
½ID1 þ iD1  ekt þ I0 
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2  ekt þ I0  ðI þ iD1  ekt Þ ðI þ iD2  ekt Þ
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2  ekt   ½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2  ekt 
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2  ekt 
 ðjÞ
 ½Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt 
½ðID1 þ I0 Þ þ iD1  ekt 
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2  ekt  ðI þ iD1  ekt Þ ðI þ iD2  ekt Þ
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt þ iD2  iD2  e2kt
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2  ekt  ½ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt 
 ðjÞ
 ðjÞ  ½Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt 
½ðID1 þ I0 Þ þ iD1  ekt  ½ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt 
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2  ekt  ðI þ iD1  ekt Þ ðI þ iD2  ekt Þ
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt þ iD2  iD2  e2kt
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt  iD2  iD1  e2kt
f ðjÞ 2
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ  i2D1  e2kt
 ½Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt 
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2  ekt  ðI þ iD1  ekt Þ ðI þ iD2  ekt Þ
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

iD2  iD2  0; iD2  iD1  0; i2D1  0


1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 125

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðI þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
 f D2 ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
 ½Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt 
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2  ekt  ðI þ iD1  ekt Þ ðI þ iD2  ekt Þ
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt þ Y ðjÞ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  y  ekt  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  y  e2kt þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD2  y  e2kt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2  ekt  ðI þ iD1  ekt Þ ðI þ iD2  ekt Þ
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

iD1  y  0; iD2  y  0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt þ Y ðjÞ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  y  ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2  ekt  ðI þ iD1  ekt Þ ðI þ iD2  ekt Þ
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

We have already approved in calculation No. 1

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


I þ iD1  ekt I þ iD2  ekt I I
lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
I0 I0 I0 I0
iD2 iD 1
þ f ðjÞ þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
ID ID I0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
126 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt þ Y ðjÞ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
f ðjÞ 2
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  y  ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD  ekt I I
f þ 2 g  flnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload RL  Cload I0 I0
iD2 iD 1 1 kt
þ f ðjÞ þ ðjÞ g e g
I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
k  iD2  ekt ¼  
Cload  Vt Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt Y ðjÞ  iD2  ekt
f ðjÞ
 ðjÞ 2
þ ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðI þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  y  ekt
 f D2 ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðI þ I0 Þ iD  ekt I I
 f D2 þ 2 g  flnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload RL  Cload I0 I0
iD 2 iD 1 1 kt
þ f ðjÞ þ ðjÞ g e g
I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
k  iD2  ekt ¼  
Cload  Vt Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt Y ðjÞ  iD2  ekt
f ðjÞ
 ðjÞ 2
þ ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðI þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  y  ekt
 f D2 ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ ID 1 ID 2
  lnf½ þ 1  ½ þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
  f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
RL  Cload ID ID I 0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt I I
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
1 iD2  iD2 iD1  iD2 1
  f ðjÞ þ ðjÞ g   e2kt
RL  Cload ID ID I0
½ I0 þ 1 ½ I0 þ 1
2 1
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 127

iD2  iD2  0; iD1  iD2  0


ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2  ðID2 þ I0 Þ ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
k  iD2  ekt ¼  
Cload  Vt Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt Y ðjÞ  iD2  ekt
f ðjÞ
 ðjÞ
þ ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ2 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  y  ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ I I
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
  f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
RL  Cload I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt I I
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
dID2
At fixed point dt ¼0

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


dID2 I  ðID2 þ I0 Þ Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ
¼ 0 )  D2 
dt Cload  Vt ðjÞ
ðI þ I0 Þ D1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ ID1 ID2
  lnf½ þ 1  ½ þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
kt
I  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
k  iD2  e ¼  D2
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt Y ðjÞ  iD2  ekt
 f ðjÞ 2
þ ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  y  ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ
ðI þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
 D2  f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
RL  Cload ID ID I 0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD  ekt I I
 2  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
128 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Remark: it is reader exercise to build the system Jacobian matrix and analyze the
dynamic and stability of the system based on eigenvalues investigation.
ðjÞ ðjÞ
We define ID1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ID1 þ iD1  ekðts1 Þ ; ID2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ID2 þ iD2  ekðts2 Þ and
Zðt  DÞ ¼ Z ðjÞ þ z  ekðtDÞ . Then we get three delayed differential equations with
respect to coordinates ½Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y arbitrarily small increments of exponential
dZðtÞ dID1 ðtÞ dID2 ðtÞ
½z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y  ekt . We consider no delay effects on dt ; dt ; dt ; Y
ðjÞ
¼ 0.

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


½L1  Lcalc  I  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt ðID2 þ I0 Þ
z  k  ekt ¼  ½y  ekt  D2  ðjÞ  y  ekt
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt ðI þ I0 Þ D1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2  ekt  Y ðjÞ ðI þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
þ  iD1  ekt  Y ðjÞ  þ D2  f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
ðjÞ
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ
ðID1 þ I0 Þ RL  Cload ID ID I 0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðiÞ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt I I RDC RDC
  lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þ   z  ekt  ½iD1  ekt þ iD2  ekt  
RL  Cload I0 I0 Lcalc Lcalc  C1
Vt iD1  ekt
 f g
Lcalc  C1 I
ðjÞ

I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ

ðiiÞ k  iD1  ekt ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt


ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt Y ðjÞ  iD2  ekt
 f ðjÞ
þ ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  y  ekt
ðiiiÞ f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
  f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
RL  Cload ID ID I 0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt I I
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

iD1  ekt ! iD1  ekt  eks1 ; iD2  ekt ! iD2  ekt  eks2 ;
z  ekt ! z  ekt  ekD ; Y ðjÞ ¼ 0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 129

Remark: left side of below equation doesn’t affect by delay parameter.


ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  I  iD2  ekt  eks2 þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt  eks2
z  k  ekt ¼  ½y  ekt  D2
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ
 ðjÞ
 y  ekt
ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2  eks2 iD  eks1 1 kt
þ  f ðjÞ þ 1ðjÞ g e
RL  Cload I I I0
ðiÞ ½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt  eks2 I I
  lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þ
RL  Cload I0 I0
RDC kt kD
 ze e  ½iD1  e  eks1 þ iD2  ekt  eks2 
kt
Lcalc
RDC Vt iD  eks1  ekt
  f 1 g
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 I
ðjÞ

I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ

Divide above equations two sides by ekt :


ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  f2  ID2 þ I0 g  iD2  eks2 ðID2 þ I0 Þ
zk¼  ½y   ðjÞ y
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2  eks2 iD  eks1 1
þ  f ðjÞ þ 1ðjÞ g
RL  Cload I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  eks2 I I RDC
  lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þ   z  ekD
RL  Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
RDC Vt iD  eks1
 ½iD1  eks1 þ iD2  eks2     f 1 ðjÞ g
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 I
I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ

ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ½L1  Lcalc  f2  ID2 þ I0 g  iD2  eks2
zk y 
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt
ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ
  y
Lcalc  C1 ðI ðjÞ þ I0 Þ
D1
ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2  eks2 iD  eks1 1
þ   f ðjÞ þ 1ðjÞ g
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  iD2  eks2 I I
   lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þ
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload I0 I0
RDC kD ks1 ks2 RDC
 ze  ½iD1  e þ iD 2  e 
Lcalc Lcalc  C1
Vt iD  eks1
  f 1 ðjÞ g¼0
Lcalc  C1 I
I0  ð ID01 þ 1Þ
130 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ½L1  Lcalc  f2  ID2 þ I0 g  iD2  eks2
zk y 
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt
ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ
  y
Lcalc  C1 ðI ðjÞ þ I0 Þ
D1
ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2  eks2
þ  
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload  I0 IDðjÞ2
½ I0 þ 1
ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD1  eks1
þ  
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload  I0 IDðjÞ1
½ I0 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  iD2  eks2 I I
   lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þ
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload I0 I0
RDC kD ks1 ks2 RDC
 ze  ½iD1  e þ iD2  e 
Lcalc Lcalc  C1
Vt iD  eks1
  f 1 ðjÞ g¼0
Lcalc  C1 ID
I0  ð I0 þ 1Þ
1

ðjÞ
RDC kD ½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ eks1
f e  kg  z þ f   ðjÞ
Lcalc Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload  I0 ID1
½ I0 þ 1
Vt eks1 RDC
 f gþ  eks1 g  iD1
Lcalc  C1 ðjÞ
ID Lcalc  C1
I0  ð I01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ eks2
þf   ðjÞ
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload  I0 ID2
½ I0 þ 1
ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  f2  ID2 þ I0 g  eks2
 
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  eks2 I I
   lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þ
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ
RDC ½L1  Lcalc  ðI þ I0 Þ
  eks2 g  iD2   f1 þ DðjÞ2 gy¼0
Lcalc  C1 Lcalc  C1 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 131

ðjÞ
RDC kD ½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1
f e  kg  z þ f  
Lcalc Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload  I0 ðjÞ
ID
½ I01 þ 1
Vt 1 RDC
 f gþ g  eks1  iD1
Lcalc  C1 ðjÞ
ID Lcalc  C1
I0  ð I01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1 ½L1  Lcalc  f2  ID2 þ I0 g
þf    
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload  I0 I
ðjÞ
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt
½ ID02 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  1 I I RDC
   lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þ  g  eks2  iD2
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload I0 I0 Lcalc  C1
ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðI þ I0 Þ
  f1 þ DðjÞ2 gy¼0
Lcalc  C1 ðID1 þ I0 Þ

We define for simplicity the following global parameters:

ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1 Vt 1 RDC
!1 ¼    f gþ
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload  I0 ID
ðjÞ
Lcalc  C1 ðjÞ
ID Lcalc  C1
½ I01 þ 1 I0  ð I01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1 ½L1  Lcalc  f2  ID2 þ I0 g
!2 ¼    
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload  I0 I
ðjÞ
Lcalc  C1 Cload  Vt
½ ID02 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  1 I I RDC
   lnð½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1Þ 
Lcalc  C1 RL  Cload I0 I0 Lcalc  C1
ðjÞ
½L1  Lcalc  ðI þ I0 Þ
!3 ¼  f1 þ DðjÞ2 g
Lcalc  C1 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
RDC kD
f e  kg  z þ !1  eks1  iD1 þ !2  eks2  iD2  !3  y ¼ 0
Lcalc

iD1  ekt ! iD1  ekt  eks1 ; iD2  ekt ! iD2  ekt  eks2 ;
z  ekt ! z  ekt  ekD ; Y ðjÞ ¼ 0
132 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Remark left side of below equation doesn’t affect by delay parameter.

k  iD1  ekt ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt jY ðjÞ ¼0 ) k  iD1  ekt ¼ y  ekt ) k  iD1 þ y ¼ 0


ðiiÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2  iD2  ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt

ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ  ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD1  ekt Y ðjÞ  iD2  ekt
 f ðjÞ
þ ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  y  ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðiiiÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
  f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g   ekt
RL  Cload ID ID I 0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt I I
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0

iD1  ekt ! iD1  ekt  eks1 ; iD2  ekt ! iD2  ekt  eks2 ;
z  ekt ! z  ekt  ekD ; Y ðjÞ ¼ 0

Remark left side of below equation doesn’t affect by delay parameter.

ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2  iD2  ekt  eks2 þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  ekt  eks2
k  iD2  ekt ¼ 
Cload  Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ  ðID1 þ I0 Þ  y  ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2  eks2 iD  eks1 1 kt
  f ðjÞ þ 1ðjÞ g e
RL  Cload ID ID I0
½ I0 þ 1
2
½ I0 þ 1
1

ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  ekt  eks2 I I
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
kt
We divide above two sides by e term.
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 133

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


I  iD2  eks2 þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ  iD2  eks2 ðID2 þ I0 Þ
k  iD2 ¼  D2  ðjÞ y
Cload  Vt ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2  eks2 iD  eks1 1
  f ðjÞ þ 1ðjÞ g
RL  Cload ID ID I0
½ I0 þ 1
2
½ I0 þ 1
1

ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2  eks2 I I
  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
RL  Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½2  ID2 þ I0   iD2  eks2 ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2  eks2
k  iD2 ¼   ðjÞ y 
Cload  Vt ðID1 þ I0 Þ RL  Cload  I0 IDðjÞ2
½ þ 1 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2þ I0 Þ iD1  e iD  e ks1 ks2 ID 1 ID 2
  ðjÞ  2  lnf½ þ 1  ½ þ 1g
RL  Cload  I0 I RL  Cload I0 I0
½ ID01 þ 1
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1
   eks1  iD1  k  iD2
RL  Cload  I0 ðjÞ
ID
½ I0 þ 11

ðjÞ ðjÞ
½2  ID2 þ I0  ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1
ð þ 
Cload  Vt RL  Cload  I0 ðjÞ
ID
½ I02 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
1 I I ðI þ I0 Þ
þ  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1gÞ  iD2  eks2  DðjÞ2 y¼0
RL  Cload I0 I0 ðID1 þ I0 Þ

We define the following global parameters for simplicity.

ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1
!4 ¼   ;
RL  Cload  I0 ðjÞ
ID
½ I0 þ 1
1

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


½2  þ I0 
ID 2 ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1 1 I I
!5 ¼ þ  þ  lnf½ D1 þ 1  ½ D2 þ 1g
Cload  Vt RL  Cload  I0 I
ðjÞ
RL  Cload I0 I0
½ ID02 þ 1
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ
!6 ¼ ðjÞ
ðID1 þ I0 Þ
!4  eks1  iD1  k  iD2  !5  iD2  eks2  !6  y ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
!k ¼ !k ðZ ðjÞ ; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y ðjÞ ; L1 ; Lcalc ; RL ; Cload ; RDC ; I0 ; VÞ 8 k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6:

ðjÞ ðjÞ
In the equilibrium fixed points: Z ðjÞ ; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y ðjÞ ¼ 0
134 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

The small increments Jacobian of our RFID burst switch system is as follows:

RDC kD
f e  kg  z þ !1  eks1  iD1
Lcalc
þ !2  eks2  iD2  !3  y ¼ 0
 k  iD1 þ y ¼ 0
!4  eks1  iD1  ½k þ !5  eks2   iD2  !6  y ¼ 0
dID1 dYðtÞ d 2 ID1
¼Y ) ¼
dt dt dt2
d 2 ID1 dYðtÞ
We consider dt2 ! e then dt ¼0

dYðtÞ
YðtÞ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y  ekt ) ¼ y  k  ekt ;
dt
dYðtÞ
¼ 0 ) y  k  ekt ¼ 0 ) jekt 6¼0 y  k ¼ 0 ) y  k ¼ 0
dt 0 1
0 1 z
N11 . . . N14 B C
B . B iD1 C
B . .. .. C
CB C
@ . . . A B C
B ¼ 0;
C
@ iD2 A
N41    N44
y
RDC kD
N11 ¼  e  k; N12 ¼ !1  eks1 ; N13 ¼ !2  eks2
Lcalc
N14 ¼ !3 ; N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ k; N23 ¼ 0; N24 ¼ 1;
N31 ¼ 0; N32 ¼ !4  eks1 ; N33 ¼ k  !5  eks2
N34 ¼ !6 ; N41 ¼ 0; N42 ¼ 0; N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k
0 1
N11 . . . N14
B . .. .. C
AkI ¼B @ .. .
C
. A; det jA  k  Ij ¼ 0
N31    N34
RDC kD RDC kðD þ s2 Þ
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; DÞ ¼ k4 þ k3  ½ e þ !5  eks2  þ k2  !5  e
Lcalc Lcalc

We have three sub cases: (I) s2 ¼ s; D ¼ 0(II) s2 ¼ 0; D [ 0(III) s2 ¼ D ¼ sD

RDC RDC
ðIÞ Dðk; s2 ¼ s; D ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ k3  þ ½k3  !5 þ k2  !5    eks
Lcalc Lcalc
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 135

RDC RDC
ðIIÞ Dðk; s2 ¼ 0; D [ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ k3  !5 þ ½k3  þ k2  ! 5    ekD
Lcalc Lcalc

RDC
Dðk; s2 ¼ sD ; D ¼ sD Þ ¼ k4 þ k3  ½ þ !5   eksD
Lcalc
ðIIIÞ
RDC ksD ksD
þ k2  ! 5  e e
Lcalc
Under Taylor series approximation: eksD  1  k  sD . The Maclaurin series is
a Taylor series expansion of a eksD function about zero (0). We get the following
general characteristic equation D(k, sD) under Taylor series approximation:
eksD  1  k  sD [5, 6].

RDC
Dðk; s2 ¼ sD ; D ¼ sD Þ ¼ k4 þ fk3  ½ þ !5 
Lcalc
RDC
þ k2  ! 5   ð1  k  sD Þg  eksD
Lcalc

Possible characteristic equations: (I) Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks 8 n [ m


(II) Dðk; DÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  ekD (III) Dðk; sD Þ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eksD .
We summary, our results in the following table:

s2 ¼ s; D ¼ 0(n > m) s2 ¼ 0; D [ 0(n > m) s2 ¼ sD ; D ¼ sD (n > m)


n 4 4 4
m 3 3 3
Pn k4 þ k3  LRcalc
DC
k4 þ k3  !5 k4
Qm k3  !5 þ k2  !5  LRcalc
DC
k3  LRcalc
DC
þ k2  !5  LRcalc
DC
k3  ½
RDC
þ !5 
Lcalc
RDC
þ k2  !5   ð1  k  sD Þ
Lcalc

Our RFID bursts switch homogeneous system for z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y leads to a char-
acteristic equation for the eigenvalue k having the form PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0.
First case s2 ¼ s; D ¼ 0. The general characteristic equation D(k, s) is ad follow:

RDC RDC
Dðk; s2 ¼ s; D ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ k3  þ ½k3  !5 þ k2  !5    eks
Lcalc Lcalc

The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is


136 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ
k

k¼0

þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k2 þ P3 ðsÞ  k3 þ P4 ðsÞ  k4


P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P2 ðsÞ ¼ 0;
RDC
P3 ðsÞ ¼ ; P4 ðsÞ ¼ 1
Lcalc

The expression for Qn ðk; sÞ is

X
M
Qn ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 þ q3 ðsÞ  k3 q0 ðsÞ
k¼0
RDC
¼ 0; q1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; q2 ðsÞ ¼ !5  ; q3 ðsÞ ¼ !5
Lcalc

The homogeneous system for z; iD1 ; i0D2 ; y leads to a characteristic equation for
the eigenvalue k having the form

X
4 X
3
Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j
j¼0 j¼0

And the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on qi ; qk and delay
qi ; qk is any RFID burst switching parameters, other parameters keep as a constant.

RDC
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ 0; a3 ¼ ;
Lcalc
RDC
a4 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ 0; c1 ¼ 0; c2 ¼ !5  ; c3 ¼ ! 5
Lcalc

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 (not in sub case I) for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e. k = 0 is not a of
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0. Furthermore, P(k), Q(k) are analytic functions of k, for
which the following requirements of the analysis [BK] can also be verified in the
present case:
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R, then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of F (x) = 0 is continuous and differentiable
respect to qi ; qk .
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 137

We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That
is, for any real number x,

pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0:
RDC
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x4  i  x3  ;
Lcalc
RDC
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ i  x3  !5  x2  !5 
Lcalc
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ
RDC RDC
¼ x4  i  x3   i  x3  !5  x2  !5  6¼ 0
Lcalc Lcalc
RDC 2
jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ P2R þ P2I ¼ x8 þ x6  ½  ;
Lcalc
RDC 2
jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ Q2R þ Q2I ¼ x6  !25 þ x4  !25  ½ 
Lcalc
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2
RDC 2 RDC 2
¼ x8 þ x6  ½   x6  !25  x4  !25  ½ 
Lcalc Lcalc
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2
RDC 2 RDC 2
¼ x8 þ x6  f½   !25 g  x4  !25  ½ 
Lcalc Lcalc

We define the following parameters for simplicity:

U0 ; U2 ; U4 ; U6 ; U8
RDC 2 RDC 2
U0 ¼ 0; U2 ¼ 0; U4 ¼ !25  ½  ; U6 ¼ ½   !25 ; U8 ¼ 1
Lcalc Lcalc

P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies U2k  x2k ¼ 0. And its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. Furthermore

RDC RDC
PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4 ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x3  ; QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2  !5 
Lcalc Lcalc
PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x3  !5 ; sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2
PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2
138 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

DC 2
x7  !5 þ x5  ½LRcalc   !5 ½ LRcalc
DC
þ Lcalc   x  !5
RDC 6
sin hðsÞ ¼ ; cos hðsÞ ¼  ¼0
DC 2 DC 2
x6  !25 þ x4  !25  ½LRcalc  x6  !25 þ x4  !25  ½LRcalc 

DC 2 DC 2
x7  !5 þ x5  ½LRcalc   !5 x5  !5  fx2 þ ½LRcalc  g x
sin hðsÞ ¼ 2
¼ ¼ ; cos hðsÞ ¼ 0
DC 2
x6  !5 þ x4  !5  ½Lcalc
2 2 RDC
 x4  !5  fx2 þ ½Lcalc
2 R
 g !5

We use different parameters terminology from our last characteristics parameters


definition: k ! j; pk ðsÞ ! aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 3; n [ m. Additionally
P4 P
3
Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! QðkÞ then PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j
j¼0 j¼0
PðkÞ ¼ k4 þ k3  LRcalc
DC
; QðkÞ ¼ k3  !5 þ k2  !5  LRcalc DC
n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m and
aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable function of s such that a0 þ c0 6
¼ 0 (not in sub case I). In the following “—” denotes complex and conjugate.
PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s. The coefficients
faj ðLcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . .Þ and cj ðLcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . .Þg 2
R depend on RFID burst switch system’s Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . values.

RDC RDC
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ 0; a3 ¼ ; a4 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ 0; c1 ¼ 0; c2 ¼ !5  ; c3 ¼ ! 5
Lcalc Lcalc

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments


ðLcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . .Þ will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj.
The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their argu-
ments. 8 Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . 2 R þ I.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root of the
characteristic equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions of k for
which the following requirements of the analysis (see Kuang 1993, Sect. 3.4) can
also be verified in the present case [6, 7].
(a) If k ¼ i  x, x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0, i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
ðLcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . .Þ domain of interest.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
R
k3 !5 þ k2 !5 L DC
Indeed, in the limit j QðkÞ j ¼ j
PðkÞ R
calc
j
k4 þ k3 L DC
calc

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2


ðcÞ RDC 2 RDC 2
¼ x8 þ x6  f½   !25 g  x4  !25  ½ 
Lcalc Lcalc
Has at most a finite number of zeroes. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x (Degree
in x8 ).
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 139

(d) Each positive root xðLcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . .Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is con-


tinuous and differentiable with respect to Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . ..
This condition can only be assessed numerically.
In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have, and Qði  xÞ ¼
Qði  xÞ thus, x [ 0 may be an eigenvalue of the characteristic equation. The
analysis consists in identifying the roots of characteristic equation situated on the
imaginary axis of the complex k-plane, where by increasing the parameters
Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . ., Rek may, at the crossing,Change its sign from
ðjÞ ðjÞ
(−) to (+), i.e. from a stable focus E ðjÞ ðZ ðjÞ ; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y ðjÞ ¼ 0Þ to an unstable one, or
vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial
derivatives with respect to Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . and gate antenna
parameters.

@Rek
^1 ðLcalc Þ ¼ ð Þ ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Lcalc k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðRDC Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lcalc ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . ¼ const
@RDC k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lcalc ; RDC ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . ¼ const
@C1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðL1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . ¼ const
@L1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðCload Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; RL ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Cload k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; . . . ¼ const
@s k¼ix
x 2 Rþ :
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2
X
4
¼ U0 þ U2  x2 þ U4  x4 þ U6  x6 þ U8  x8 ¼ U2k  x2k
k¼0

P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies U2k  x2k ¼ 0 When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i 
k¼0
PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼ i  x into RFID burst switch
system’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following :

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin x  s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2

PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos x  s ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2
140 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above sin x  s and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and
adding the sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note that FðxÞ is dependent of s. Now it is important to notice that if s 62 I (assume
that I R þ 0 is the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for, s 62 I , xðsÞ is
not defined. Then for all s in I xðsÞ is satisfied that Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0). Then there are no
positive xðsÞ solutions for Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have stability switches. For
any s 2 I , where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, we can define the angle
hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of
PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼ ;
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ þ n2p
n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions
I ! R; Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞSn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and
differentiable in s. In the following, the subscripts k; x; Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ;
Cload ; RL ; . . . indicate the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate
on ^ðxÞ, remember in kðLcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; . . .Þ and xðLcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ;
Cload ; RL ; . . .Þ, and keeping all parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation
closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiating RFID burst switch charac-
teristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and
inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark

x ¼ Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; . . .; etc:;

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ
Where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . .: etc., Substituting k ¼ i  x, and bearing i
Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ; i  Qk ði 
xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ and that on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains

@k 1 i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þ jk¼ix ¼ ð Þ
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ;


Q ¼ QR þ i  QI ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ;
Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ;P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I . When (x) can be any RFID burst switch
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 141

parameters and time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we have dropped the
arguments ði  x; xÞ, and where

Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ;


Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ

xx ¼ Fx =Fx . We define U and V:

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ:

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = s .

RDC RDC
PR ¼ x4 ; PI ¼ x3  ; QR ¼ x2  !5  ;
Lcalc Lcalc
QI ¼ x3  !5 ; PRs ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0
RDC
QRs ¼ 0; QIs ¼ 0; PRx ¼ 4  x3 ; PIx ¼ 3  x2  ;
Lcalc
RDC
QRx ¼ 2  x  !5  ; QIx ¼ 3  x2  !5
Lcalc
RDC RDC
QI  QRx ¼ 2  x4  !25  ; PR  PIx ¼ 3  x6  ;
Lcalc Lcalc
RDC RDC
PI  PRx ¼ 4  x6  ; QR  QIx ¼ 3  x4  !25 
Lcalc Lcalc
RDC 2
PRx  PR ¼ 4  x ; QRx  QR ¼ 2  x  !5  ½
7 3 2
 ;
Lcalc
V ¼ ðPR  PIs  PI  PRs Þ  ðQR  QIs  QI  QRs Þ ¼ 0

RDC
U ¼ ðPR  PIx  P1  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ ¼ 3  x6 
Lcalc
RDC RDC RDC
þ 4  x6   ð3  x4  !25   2  x4  !25  Þ
Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc
RDC RDC RDC
U ¼ 3  x6  þ 4  x6   3  x4  !25 
Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc
RDC RDC RDC
þ 2  x4  !25  ¼ x6   x4  !25 
Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc
6 RDC 2 RDC RDC
QIx  QI ¼ 3:x  !5 ; U ¼ x 
5 2
 x  !5 
4
¼ x4   ½x2  !25 
Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc
Fs ¼ 2  ½ðPRs  PR þ PIs  PI Þ  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þ ¼ 0;
RDC 2
PIx  PI ¼ 3  x5  ½ 
Lcalc
142 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ


RDC 2 RDC 2
¼ 2  f4  x7 þ 3  x5  ½   ð2  x3  !25  ½  þ 3  x5  !25 Þg
Lcalc Lcalc
RDC 2 RDC 2
Fx ¼ 2  f4  x7  3  x5  !25 þ 3  x5  ½   2  x3  !25  ½  g
Lcalc Lcalc
RDC 2 3
Fx ¼ 2  fx5  ð4  x2  3  !25 Þ þ ½   x  ð3  x2  2  !25 Þg
Lcalc
 
@x @x Fs 1 @Rek @x Fs
Fx  þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) ¼  ; ^ ðsÞ ¼ ; ¼ xs ¼ 
@s @s Fx @s k¼ix @s Fx
8 h i9
@x Fs < 2  U þ s  jP j2
þ i  F x =
¼ xs ¼  jFs ¼0 ¼ 0; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ Re h i
@s Fx : F þ i  2  V þ x  jPj2 ;
s

@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@s k¼ix
@x U  @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  signfs  þxþ g
@s jPj2
@x U  @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  signfs  þxþ gj@x¼0
@s jPj2 @s

¼ signfFx g  signfxg
RDC 2
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signf4  x7 þ 3  x5  ½ 
Lcalc
RDC 2
 ð2  x3  !25  ½  þ 3  x5  !25 Þg  signfxg
Lcalc

We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcations)


ðjÞ ðjÞ
RFID burst switch system, about the equilibrium point E ðjÞ ðZ ðjÞ ; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y ðjÞ ¼ 0Þ
as a result of a variation of delay parameter s. The analysis consists in identifying
the roots of our system characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the
complex k-plane. Where by increasing the delay parameter s, Re k may at the
crossing, changes its sign from − to +, i.e. from a stable focus E(*) to an unstable
one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of
the partial derivatives with respect to s, ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k
@s Þk¼ix
 
1 @Rek
^ ðsÞ ¼ ;
@s k¼ix
 
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ; Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; . . .; etc: ¼ const; x 2 R þ
@s k¼ix
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 143

We check the sign of ^1 ðsÞ according the following rule:


 
sign½Fx  sign V þPx2 s U þ x þ xs  s sign½^1 ðsÞ
± ± +
±  –

RFID burst switch system stability switching analysis is done according the
below flow chart and based on [BK] geometric stability switch criteria in delay
differential systems with delay dependent parameters article [30, 31].
144 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

x ¼ Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . .; etc:;

Remark: The analysis consists in identifying the roots of circuit characteristic


equation PðkÞ ¼ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0 situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k-
Plane, where, by increasing the RFID burst switch system parameters. Rek may, at
the crossing, change its sign from “−” to “+”, i.e. from a stable focus E* to an
unstable one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the
sign of the partial derivatives with respect to system parameters. Other sub cases
sestability behavior (s2 ¼ 0; D [ 0 & s2 ¼ D ¼sD ) is not discussed and can be
good reader exercises [12].

Exercises

1. Active RFID system has two sources S1(t), S2(t) and two antennas L1 and L2
(rectangular antennas) as appear in the equivalent circuit. L1 and L2 configu-
ration structure can be represented as L2 inductor antenna which is connected in
the middle of L1 antenna. The overall parameters of two antennas are the same.
P
2
L1 ¼ Lcalc1 ¼ ½lp0  ð½ Xi   X3 þ X4 Þ  Ncp . Rectangular antennas. L2 ¼
i¼1
P
2 pffiffi
ð1 þ pÞ
Lcalc2 ¼ ½lp0  ð½ Xi   X3 þ X4 Þ  Nc  . X1, X2, X3, and X4 global antenna
i¼1
parameters are the same for inductor antenna L1 and L2.

You can neglect the mutual inductance between inductor antennas L1 and L2. C
(Gama) is the two antennas trim parameter (0 < C < 1).
Exercises 145

1:1 Write RFID system, differential equations as a matrix representation.


1:2 Write the RFID system analog Van der pol’s equations. Find all transfor-
mations between Van der pol system parameters and variables to antenna
system’s variables and parameters.
1:3 Discuss stability, How C trim parameter influences our system stability
switching?
1:4 How RFID system dynamically changes for (A) S1(t) – ON, S2(t) – OFF
(B) S1(t) – OFF, S2(t) – ON (C) S1(t) – ON, S2(t) – ON.
1:5 Find ni (i = 1, 2, 3,…) functions of our RFID system by using regular
perturbation or averaging methods.
1:6 RFID TAG IC capacitance C1 multiple his value C1 ! 2C1, How our
RFID system stability change?
2. Active RFID system includes forcing sources Si(t); i = 1,2,… and antennas
inductors (L1, L2,…). All antennas are rectangular. The following differential
equation describes our RFID system (forced Van der pol equation). R1 and C1
are RFID IC parameters.

Xk
1 X k
€ þð 1 þ
V
1
Þ
1 _ 1
 V þ pffiffiffiffiffi P V ¼ ½
1 dVSi
 
m
R1 R C C R dt
i¼1 Si 1
½ L1 þ Li   C1 1 i¼1 Si
i¼2

2:1 Express our RFID system as a matrix differential equation system.


2:2 Find fixed point and discuss stability of our system.
2:3 How our Active RFID system behavior is dependent on k and m
parameters?
2:4 Write the equivalent Van der pol system parameters U(x), a, b when only
one forcing source is active. VSi  OFF 8 i 2 ½1::k & i 6¼ n Except
VSn  ON; n 62 ½1::k.
2:5 How the dynamic of our system change for the transformation
Pm P
m
Li ! ½L1 þ Li . Find fixed points and discuss the stability issue.
i¼2 i¼2

3. Our passive RFID TAG contains one RFID IC and two rectangular antennas in
the series. The two rectangular antenna parameters are not the same and the
definition is related to global parameters: Xi1, Xi2, Xi3, Xi4. i = 1for the first
antenna and i = 2 for the second antenna. The matrix formulation for RFID
differential equation:
146 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

2 3
0 1 0
6 f " 1 #g f C11R1 g 07
2 3 6 l X4 7
6 7
dV1 6 C1  f 0
 ðX13 þ X1k Þ  Nc p
7
6 dV 6 p 7
2 7
dt
6
4 dt 5 ¼ 6 k¼1;k6 ¼ 3 7
" # 7
dV3 6 l X4 7
6 2 7
dt
6 þ 0  ðX23 þ X2k Þ  Ncp g 7
4 p k¼1;k6¼3
5
2 3 2 3 0 0 0
V1 0
 4 V2 5 þ 4 0 5
V3 1

R1 and C1 are parameters for RFID TAG IC. V1, V2, V3 are system variables.
All other antenna parameters are the same as discuss in the chapter.
3:1 Find RFID TAG system fixed points and discuss the stability.
3:2 Discuss the system Eigen direction, Eigen solutions, Eigen vectors, and
Eigenvalues behavior for t ! ∞.
3:3 How our system stability is affected by different values of “p” parameter?
Draw Stable/Unstable diagram.
3:4 Analyze RFID TAG system dynamical behavior for X2k ¼ X1k 2
 C;
k = 1,…, 4 RFID TAG antennas global parameter index. C is a shifting
parameter between the square of first antenna global parameters (X1k 2
) and
second antenna global parameters (X2k ).
3:5 How our RFID TAG system behavior changes for multiple values of
rectangular antenna’s number of turns (NC) ; NC ! 2  NC . NC is the same
for the first and second RFID TAG antenna.
4. We have delayed in time passive RFID TAG system. Due to electromagnetic
interferences, we have RFID TAG’s voltage and voltage derivative with
delays s þ 1 and s2  1 respectively in time. V1 ðtÞ ! V1 ðt  ½s þ 1Þ; V2 ðtÞ !
V2 ðt  ½s2  1Þ. We consider no delay effect on dVdt1 ðtÞ and dVdt2 ðtÞ . The RFID
TAG antenna is rectangular. Xi; i = 1, 2, 3, 4 are RFID TAG antenna global
parameters as discuss in the chapter. R1 and C1 are RFID TAG IC parameters.

dV1
¼ V2 ðt  ½s2  1Þ
dt
dV2 1
¼ f  g  V1 ðt  ½s þ 1Þ
dt C1  lp0  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Ncp
1
  V2 ðt  ½s2  1Þ
C1  R1

4:1 Find system fixed points and discuss stability for s ¼ 0.


Exercises 147

4:2 Find the system characteristic equation (Dðk; sÞ), s is our delay parameter.
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks .
4:3 Find polynomial in x representation Fðx; sÞ and sketch 3D function. Find
sin hðsÞ and cos hðsÞ expressions.
4:4 Find U; V; xs expressions and define maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2
N0 .
4:5 Find K1 ðC1 Þ; K1 ðR1 Þ; K1 ðsÞ; signðK1 ðsÞÞ expressions and discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameters.
5. We have a RFID system with two rectangular antennas (L1, L2) in parallel and
one RFID IC (R1 and C1 parameters). There are parasitic resistances of our
RFID system, rp1 ; rp2 ; rp1 6¼ rp2 . The following figure is equivalent circuit of our
RFID system.

Parameters are the same for the first and second antennas. L1 ðX11 ; X12 ; X13 ;
X14 ; . . .Þ; L2 ðX21 ; X22 ; X23 ; X24 ; . . .Þ; X11 ¼ X21 ; X12 ¼ X22 X13 ¼ X23 ; X14 ¼
X24 . We define four variables for our RFID system. V1(t)—voltage on the first
antenna, V2(t) = dV1(t)/dt—voltage derivative on the first antenna, V3(t)—
voltage on the second antenna, V4(t) = dV3(t)/dt—voltage derivative on the
second antenna.
Remark Voltages on RFID TAG antennas are only on equivalent circuit
inductors L1, L2 without parasitic resistances. Due to electromagnetic inter-
ferences, we get RFID TAG’s antenna voltages and voltages derivatives with
delays in time:
148 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

D1 6¼ D2 ; V1 ðtÞ ! V1 ðt  sÞ
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
V2 ðtÞ ! V2 ðt  s  D1 Þ; V3 ðtÞ ! V3 ðt  s þ 1Þ;
pffiffiffi
V4 ðtÞ ! V4 ðt  jD1  D2 j  sÞ:
D1 [ 0; D2 [ 0:

5:1 Find RFID system, differential equations, fixed points and discuss stability
for s ¼ 0; Di [ 0 i = 1, 2; D1 6¼ D2 .
5:2 Find the system characteristic equation Dðk; s; D1 ; D2 Þ, s is our delay
parameter and D1, D2 are parameters.

nðs; D1 ; D2 Þ
Dðk; s; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ Pn ðk; s; D1 ; D2 Þ þ Qm ðk; s; D1 ; D2 Þ  eknðs;D1 ;D2 Þ :

5:3 Find polynomial in x representation Fðx; sÞjD1 ;D2 parameters ¼ 0 and sketch
3D function. Find sin hðsÞ and cos hðsÞ expressions.
5:4 Find U, V, xs expressions and define maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2
N0 for the cases: (A) D1 = D, D2 = 0 ; (B) D1 = 0, D2 = D ;
(C) D1 = D2 = D
5:5 Find
K1 ðsÞ; K1 ðD1 Þ; K1 ðD2 Þ; signðK1 ðsÞÞ; signðK1 ðD1 ÞÞ; signðK1 ðD2 ÞÞ
expressions and discuss stability switching for different values of s; D1 ; D2 .
6. We have triple loop antennas arranged as a shifted gate in X direction.
The RFID TAG is semi passive and contains a battery that enables long reading
distance and also enables the tag to operate independently of the reader. The
double antenna gate is employed due to the fact that this antenna consists of
three parallel loops (primary, secondary, and third loop). Due to electromag-
netic interferences there are differences in time delays with respect to gate
antenna first, second and third loop voltages and voltages derivatives. The delay
voltages are Vi1 ðt  s1 Þ; Vi2 ðt  s2 Þ; Vi3 ðt  s3 Þ respectively (s1 6¼ s2 6¼ s3 ) and
pffiffiffi
ðtDÞ dVi2 ðt½D þ DÞ
and dVi3 ðt½D þ 1Þ
2
delayed voltage derivative dVi1 dt ; dt dt ; s1 0;
s2 0; s3 0; D 0. Each triple loop gate antenna is defined as a three
inductors in series Li1, Li2, Li3 with series parasitic resistors rp1 ; rp2 ; i—index of
the first and second gate. First gate: L11, L12, L13 is mostly formed by traces on
the planar PCB. 2  Lm;12 ; 2  Lm;13 ; 2  Lm;23 , elements represent the mutual
inductances between each two antenna inductors in the gate. The second loop is
within the first loop and third loop is within the second loop. We consider that
the triple loop antennas parameter values are the same in the first and second
gate ðLa1 ; La2 ; La3 ; Lb1 ; Lb2 ; Lb3 ; a1 ; a2 ; a3 Þ.
Exercises 149

2  Aj 2  Aj
L1j ¼ 4  fLbj  ln½  þ Laj  ln½  þ 2  ½aj þ lcj  ðLaj þ Lbj Þg
aj  ðLb1 þ lcj Þ aj  ðLbj þ lcj Þ
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lcj ¼ L2aj þ L2bj ; Aj ¼ Laj  Lbj

j = 1 first loop, j = 2 s loop, j = 3 third loop. Since three inductors (L11, L12,
L13) are in series and there are mutual inductances, the total antenna inductance
for the first gate:

X
3 X2 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
LT jfirst gate ¼ L1k þ 2  ½ Lm;iði þ 1Þ þ Lm;13 ; Lm;12 ¼ K1  L11  L12
k¼1 i¼1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lm;13 ¼ K2  L11  L13 ; Lm;23 ¼ K3  L12  L13 :

Lm,i-j is the mutual inductance between inductors i and j. K1, K2, and K3 are the
coupling coefficients of two inductors. 0 K1 1; 0 K2 1; 0 K3 1. We
consider the case our RFID shifted gate system is passive (power source is
disconnected). Remark: no delay effects on RFID system variables derivatives.
6:1 Find RFID double gate differential equations and fixed points (only one
gate).
6:2 Find Jacobian of our RFID shifted gate system and characteristic equation:
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; DÞ.
150 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

6:3 Find F(x, s) = 0 and its roots sinh(s) and cosh(s) expressions.
6:4 Find K1 ðs1 Þ; K1 ðs2 Þ; K1 ðs3 Þ; K1 ðDÞ expressions.
6:5 Discuss system stability switching for various values of s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; D.
7. We have RFID detector system which is represented by the following set of
differential equations matrix representation. Nkl (k = 1,…5; l = 1,…,5) global
parameter expressions are the same as describe in Sect. (1.5). Additional ele-
ments are X1, X2 and V(t) second order derivative column matrix element w. V
(t) represents the RFID tag antenna voltage in time, incoming RF small signal
from RFID reader.
0 1
dX 0 1
dt
B dY C 0 1 X
B dt C N11 ... N1n þ X2 B C
B C BY C
B dIL1 C B .. .. .. C B C
B dt C¼B C B C
B C @ . . . A B IL1 C
B dIRj C B C
B dt C Nm1 þ X1  Nmn @ IR j A
@ A n¼m¼5
dIRS IR S
dt
0 R 1 011 0 1
 L Lin L
0
B 1 PC B PC B C
B 0 C B0C BwC
B C B C dVðtÞ B C d 2 VðtÞ
B C B
þ B L C  VðtÞ þ B 0 C  C þB C
B 0 C  dt2
1
B 1 C B C dt B C
@ 0 A @0A @0A
0 0 0

7:1 Draw RFID TAG detector circuit which characterizes by our above dif-
ferential equations, matrix representation. What are the additional circuit
components and their location which represents by matrix’s parameters X1,
X2 and w? Remark: probably they are additional Schottky diode’s parasitic
elements.
7:2 Find system fixed points and discuss stability in the case of no parasitic
delay effects si ¼ 0; i = 1,2,….
7:3 Consider that the Schottky detector diode has a package parasitic induc-
tance Lp delay element in time s1 and package parasitic capacitance Cp
delay element in time s2 . Find fixed points coordinate expressions, con-
sider RF in signal VðtÞ ¼ A0 þ B0  f 2 ðtÞ.

VðtÞ ¼ A0 þ B0  f 2 ðtÞ ; jf ðtÞj\1 &A0  jf ðtÞj ; 0\B0 \1:

Find Jacobian of our RFID Schotky detector system.


7:4 Find our system characteristic equation Dðk; s1 ; s2 Þ for three cases:
(A) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0 (B)s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s (C) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s.
Exercises 151

7:5 Find ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k


@s Þk¼ix ; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . . ¼ const; x 2 R þ
and discuss stability switching for different values of delay parameter s.
8. We have RFID detector system which is represented by the following set of
differential equations matrix representation. Nkl (k = 1,…5; l = 1,…,5) global
parameter expressions are the same as described in Sect. (1.5). Additional
elements are X1, X2 and V(t) second order derivative column matrix element w1
and w2. V(t) represents the RFID tag antenna voltage in time, the incoming RF
small signal from the RFID reader.
0 1
dX 0 1
dt
B dY C 0 1 X
B dt C N11 þ X2 ... N1n B C
B C BY C
B dIL1 C B .. .. C
.. C B C
B dt C¼B B C
B C @ . . . A B I L1 C
B dIRj C B C
B dt C Nm1 þ X1  Nmn n¼m¼5 @ IRj A
@ A
dIRS IRS
dt
0 1 011 01
 LR1 Lin P LP
0
B C B C B C
B 0 C B0C Bw C
B C B C dVðtÞ B 1 C d 2 VðtÞ
þB 1
B L1 C
C  VðtÞ þ B 0 C 
B C dt þ B 0 C
B C dt2
B C B C B C
@ 0 A @0A @ 0 A
0 0 w2

8:1 Draw RFID TAG detector circuit which characterizes by our above dif-
ferential equations, matrix representation. What are the additional circuit
components and their location which represents by matrix’s parameters X1,
X2 and w1, w2? Remark: probably they are additional Schottky diode’s
parasitic elements.
8:2 Find system fixed points and discuss stability in the case of no parasitic
delay effects si ¼ 0; i = 1,2,….
8:3 Consider that the Schottky detector diode has a package parasitic inductance
Lp delay element in time s and package parasitic capacitance Cp delay
element in time s2 þ 1 . Find fixed points coordinate expressions, consider
RFin signal VðtÞ ¼ A0 þ B0  f 3 ðtÞ VðtÞ ¼ A0 þ B0  f 3 ðtÞ; jf ðtÞj\
1 & A0  jf ðtÞj; 0\B0 \1. Find Jacobian of our RFID Schottky detector
system.
8:4 Find our system characteristic equation Dðk; sÞ.
8:5 Find ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k
@s Þk¼ix ; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . . ¼ const; x 2 R þ
and discuss stability switching for different values of delay parameter s.
9. Active RFID system includes forcing sources Si(t) ; i = 1, 2,… and antennas
inductors (L1, L2,…). All antennas are rectangular. The following differential
152 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis

equation describes our RFID system (forced Van der pol equation). R1 and C1
are RFID IC parameters. Additional parameters are X1 and X2.

Xk
€ þ ð 1 þ X1 
V
1
Þ
1 _
 V þ pffiffiffiffiffi
1
V
R1 R C1 P
m
i¼1 Si ½ L1 þ X2  Li   C1
i¼2

1 X
k
1 dVSi
¼ ½  
C1 i¼1 RSi dt

9:1 Express our RFID system as a matrix differential equation system.


9:2 Find fixed point and discuss stability of our system for different values of
X1 and X2 parameters.
9:3 How our Active RFID system behavior is dependent on k, m, X1 and X2
parameters?
9:4 Write the equivalent Van der pol system parameters U(x), a, b when only
one forcing source is active. VSi  OFF8i 2 ½1. . .k & i 6¼ n Except
VSn  ON; n 62 ½1::k.
9:5 How the dynamic of our system change for the transformation
Pm Pm
Li ! ½L1 þ L2i . Find fixed points and discuss stability, issue for
i¼2 i¼2
pffiffiffiffi
X1 ¼ X; X2 ¼ 1 þ X.
10. We have delayed in time passive RFID TAG system. Due to electromagnetic
interferences, we have RFID TAG’s voltage and voltage derivative with delays
pffiffiffi
sþ1 and s3  1 respectively in time.
pffiffiffi
V1 ðtÞ ! V1 ðt  ½ s þ 1Þ; V2 ðtÞ ! V2 ðt  ½s3  1Þ. We consider no delay
effect on dVdt1 ðtÞ and dVdt2 ðtÞ . The RFID TAG antenna is rectangular. Xi; i = 1, 2, 3,
4 are RFID TAG antenna global parameters as discuss in the chapter. R1 and C1
are RFID TAG IC parameters.

dV1
¼ V2 ðt  ½s3  1Þ;
dt
dV2 1 pffiffiffi
¼ f l g  V1 ðt  ½ s þ 1Þ
dt C1  p  ½X1 þ X2  X3 þ X4   Nc
0 p

1
  V2 ðt  ½s3  1Þ
C1  R1

10:1 Find system fixed points and discuss stability for s ¼ 0.


10:2 Find the system characteristic equation (Dðk; sÞ), s is our delay parameter.
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks .
Exercises 153

10:3 Find polynomial in x representation Fðx; sÞ and sketch 3D function. Find


sin hðsÞ and cos hðsÞ expressions.
10:4 Find U; V; xs expressions and define maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ

Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 :

10:5 Find K1 ðC1 Þ; K1 ðR1 Þ; K1 ðsÞ; signðK1 ðsÞÞ expressions and discuss
stability switching for different value of s parameters.
Chapter 2
Microwave Elements Description
and Stability Analysis

There are three types of microwave circuits which include microwave elements.
The first is a discrete circuit; packaged diodes/transistors mounted in coax and
waveguide assemblies. Second Hybrid MIC (Microwave Integrated Circuit);
diodes/transistors and microstrip fabricated separately and then assembled. The
third is MMIC (Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit); diodes, transistors and
microstrip fabricated simultaneously. The monolithic microwave integrated circuit
(MMIC) consists of diodes, transistor, microstrip transmission lines, microstrip
circuits, and other circuit elements, such as lumped capacitors, resistors, etc., which
have parasitic effects influence on overall system stability behavior. The discrete
microwave circuit can be PIN diodes mounted in a coaxial transmission line which
characterize by parasitic effects and delay variables in time. Hybrid microwave
integrated circuit’s wire bonds cause reliability problems and parasitic effects;
stability issue can affect every hybrid microwave integrated circuits. Many receivers
are often at risk of having their front end burned out by high power RF. Receivers
are traditionally protected by a power limiter circuit. The limiter diode is a special
type of the PIN diode. Due to the parasitic effects of microstrip transmission lines
there is a delay in time for input RF signal result in the end. Power limiters use with
transmission line face stability behavior for different delay time values. Reflection
Type Phase Shifter (RTPS), employing a circulator. Micro strip transmission lines
with three port active circulator, stability analysis under time delayed. Many RF
systems are use Active circulator as a passive non-reciprocal three- or four-port
device, in which microwave or radio frequency power entering any port is trans-
mitted to the next port in rotation (only). Micro strip transmission lines fid those
active circulator ports and face a delay parasitic effect of transferring signals in time.
These circulator’s micro strip transmission lines, delays cause to system instability.
Resonant RF network antennas are important to plasma sources with many appli-
cations. The cylindrical resonant RF network antennas run as large volume plasma

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 155


O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_2
156 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

sources and have stability switching due to system’s copper legs parasitic effects.
The cylindrical RF network antennas structure is 16-leg cylindrical (birdcage) RF
antenna which has electrical circuit and opposite points of RF feeding and
grounding. Due to cylindrical antenna parasitic delayed in time, there is a stability
issue by analyzing its operation. Tunnel diode is the p-n junction device that
exhibits negative resistance. That means when the voltage increases the current
through it decreases. Typical Tunnel Diode (TD) I-V characteristic has two distinct
features: (1) it is STRONGLY non-linear (compare to the resistor I-V). Current-
Voltage relationships for TDs cannot be described using the Ohm’s law (2) it has a
negative differential resistance (NDR) region. Tunnel diode can be a microwave
oscillator. Transient is in the resonant cavity after turning the bias voltage ON. The
resonant circuit with NDR can oscillate. The TD microwave oscillator has parasitic
effects in time and delay variables. Stability is a very crucial issue when designing
microwave oscillator by using Tunnel Diode (TD) [14, 15].

2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time


Power Limiters Stability Analysis

Microwave and RF receivers, as well as many instruments, are susceptible to


damage from input signals having amplitudes which exceed some danger level. The
front end of some receivers can be destroyed by power levels. Avoiding such
damage is by using a power limiter which designed around a special type of PIN
diode called a limiter diode. A thin epitaxial I-layer is formed on a heavily N+
doped substrate, after which P+ top contacts are added by diffusion. Typical limiter
diodes have I-layer thickness between 2 and 7 lm, with corresponding values of
breakdown voltage. The diode is mounted in shunt across the microstrip trans-
mission line which leads to the receiver front end, and is provided with a DC bias
return. For incoming signals which are below the threshold level in amplitude, the
diode acts as an ordinary unbiased PIN diode, which is to say that it appears to be a
capacitor of relatively small value. When the incident signal exceeds the threshold
power level, the diode’s I-layer is flooded with carriers during the positive half
cycle of the incoming RF signal. Most of these carriers persist through the negative
half cycle, DC current begins to flow in the loop formed by the diode and bias
return choke, and the diode biases itself to a low value of resistance in a matter of
nanoseconds. Under the influence of this self generated bias current, the diode’s
junction resistance falls to a very low value, shorting out the transmission line. The
limiter circuit, then acts as a reflective switch, reflecting the large signal back to its
source and protecting the circuitry which is “downstream” from the limiter. Our
Microstrip transmission lines with power limiters system delay differential and
delay different model can be analytically by using delay differential equations in
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 157

dynamically. The need of the incorporation of a time delay is often of the existence
of any stage structure. It is often difficult to analytically study models with delay
dependent parameters, even if only a single discrete delay is present. There is a
practical guidelines that combine graphical information with analytical work to
effectively study the local stability of models involving delay dependent parame-
ters. The stability of a given steady state is simply determined by the graphs of
some function of microstrip delays s1, s2 which can be expressed, explicitly and
thus can be easily depicted by Matlab and other popular software. We need only
look at one such function and locate the zeros. This function often has only two
zeros, providing thresholds for stability switches. As time delay increases, stability
changes from stable to unstable to stable. We emphasize the local stability aspects
of some models with delay dependent parameters. Additionally, there is a general
geometric criterion that, theoretically speaking, can be applied to models with many
delays, or even distributed delays. The simplest case of a first order characteristic
equation, providing more user friendly geometric and analytic criteria for stability
switches. The analytical criteria provided for the first and second order cases can be
used to obtain some insightful analytical statements and can be helpful for con-
ducting simulations. The most obvious way in which to amount limiter diode in
shunt across a microstrip line. Two leads of limiter diode are mounted in parallel to
the transmission line and the third lead is soldered to the ground pad as shown. D1
is a limiter diode [24–26, 33–35] (Fig. 2.1).
The shunt mounted limiter diode equivalent circuit with microstrip lines delayed
in time. The time delay for the first line segment is s1 and the second line segment s2.
See Fig. 2.2.
It is possible to locate several limiter PIN diode on microstrip line, but in the
current chapter we focus on one limiter diode with the specific connection structure.
We consider for simplicity that the microstrip segments resistances are neglected
and either related voltages Vs1 ! e, Vs2 ! e. Then we can define
Va(t) = Vi(t − s1); Vo(t) = Va(t − s2) = Vi(t − (s1 + s2)). We do our stability
analysis of three different cases: s1 ¼ s; s2 ! e; s1 ! e; s2 ¼ s; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s. We
defined Is1 ; Is2 as the current through first and second delay lines respectively.
Vs1 ; Vs2 ! e ) V0 ðtÞ ¼ Vi ðt  ðs1 þ s2 ÞÞ (Vs1 ; Vs2 are voltages of the first and
second delay lines). Is1 ¼ ViRV
s
a
; Is2 ¼ VaRV
s
0
; Is1 ¼ Ia þ Is2 ; Ia ¼ ILi ; i ¼ 0; 1; 2
1 2

Fig. 2.1 Shunt mounted


limiter diode
158 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Fig. 2.2 Shunt mounted


limiter diode equivalent
circuit with microstrip lines
delayed in time

dIa V dV
V ¼ VR1 ¼ VC1 ; Va ¼  ðL0 þ L1 þ L2 Þ þ V; Ia ¼ þ C1 
dt R1 dt
dIa 1 dV 2
d V dIa X
2
¼  þ C1  2 ; Va ¼  Li þ V; V ¼ VðtÞ
dt R1 dt dt dt i¼0
1 dV d2V X 2
Va ¼ ½  þ C1  2   Li þ V
R1 dt dt i¼0

2
We consider Vs1 ; Vs2 ! e then Vi ðt  s1 Þ ¼ Va ¼ ½R11  dV dt þ C1  dt2 
d V
P2
i¼0 Li þ V. Shifting equation Vi ðt  s1 Þ ¼ Va ¼ . . . in time by s1 gives equation:

1 dVðt þ s1 Þ d 2 Vðt þ s1 Þ X2
Vi ðtÞ ¼ ½  þ C1   L þ Vðt þ s1 Þ:
i¼0 i
R1 dt dt2

Finally, we get two Power limiter equations (with delays s1, s2)

1 dVðt  s2 Þ d 2 Vðt  s2 Þ X 2
V0 ðtÞ ¼ ½  þ C1    Li þ Vðt  s2 Þ; Vi ðt  s1 Þ
R1 dt dt2 i¼0
1 dV d2V X 2
¼½  þ C1  2   Li þ V
R1 dt dt i¼0

We get two Power limiter equations, one of them is a differential equation which
involves input coming signal.
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 159

1 dV d2 V X 2
Vi ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ½  þ C1  2   Li þ V; xðtÞ ¼ Vi ðt  s1 Þ;
R1 dt dt i¼0
X
2
1 X 2
n1 ¼ C 1  Li ; n2 ¼  Li ; n3 ¼ 1; V ¼ f ðn1 ; n2 ; n3 ; xðtÞÞ
i¼0
R1 i¼0

€  n1 þ V_  n2 þ V  n3 ¼ xðtÞ ) V
V € þ V_  n2 þ V  n3 ¼ 1 xðtÞ: This differential
n1 n1 n1
equation can recognize as forced Van der Pol equation. The basic Van der Pol
equation can be written in the form: V € þ a  /ðVÞ  V_ þ V ¼ b  pðtÞ

n2 1 n 1 n3 1 1
¼ ; 3¼ ; ! ð1  eÞ; b  pðtÞ ¼ xðtÞ ¼  xðtÞ
n1 R1  C1 n1 P2 n1 n1 P2
C1  Li C1  Li
i¼0 i¼0
1
¼  Vi ðt  s1 Þ
P2
C1  Li
i¼0

1 1 1
a  /ðVÞ ¼ ;a¼ ; /ðVÞ ¼ 1; b ¼ ! ð1  eÞ; pðtÞ
R1  C1 R1  C1 P2
C1  Li
i¼0
¼ Vi ðt  s1 Þ

We can consider the incoming signal after delay s1 is T periodic and a, b are
non-negative parameters. It is convenient to write our power limiter Van der Pol
equation as autonomous system when ðV; W; hÞ 2 R2 x S2 .
V_ ¼ W  R11C1 ; W_ ¼ V þ P1 2  Vi ðh  s1 Þ; h_ ¼ 1: We suppose
C1  i¼0
Li
a; b  1, since we are interested in the periodic coming signal response we use 2p
x
periodic transformation.
! ! !
u1 cos x  t  x1 sin x  t V
¼ 
u2  sin x  t  x1 cos x  t W

du1 1 x2  1
¼  /ðVÞ  cos x  t  ð Þ  V  sin x  t
dt R1  C1 x
1
 P  sin x  t  Vi ðt  s1 Þ
x  C1  2i¼0 Li
du2 1 x2  1
¼  /ðVÞ  sin x  t  ð Þ  V  cos x  t
dt R1  C1 x
1
 P  cos x  t  Vi ðt  s1 Þ
x  C1  2i¼0 Li
160 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

First equation solution: V ¼ u1  cos x  t  u2  sin x  t assuming that we are


near resonance, so that jx2  1j; a; b is all small ðr ¼ ð1  x2 Þ  R1  C1 =xÞ, we get

du1 1 u1
¼  ½u1  r  u2   ðu21 þ u22 Þ;
dt 2  R1  C1 4
du2 1 u2 1
¼  ½u2 þ r  u1   ðu21 þ u22 Þ  P
dt 2  R1  C1 4 2  x  C1  2i¼0 Li

There is no significant difference if we set one of delays s1, s2 to zero for that
Van der Pol equation. The second Power limiter differential equation involves
output voltage.
1 dVðt  s2 Þ d 2 Vðt  s2 Þ X 2
V0 ðtÞ ¼ ½  þ C1    Li þ Vðt  s2 Þ
R1 dt dt2 i¼0

We consider coming signal cause at t = 0 voltage V(t = 0), first power limiter
equation (Van der Pol). Additionally V0(t = 0) = 0. Then we get our second delay

2

P
differential equation: ½R11  dVðts
dt þ C1  d Vðts
dt2   2i¼0 Li þ Vðt  s2 Þ ¼ 0.
V(t = 0) is calculated from the first power limiter Van der Pol equation,
V(t = 0) = U1). We can represent our second power limiter delay differential
equation as a general linear real scalar neutral differential equation with single delay
s2 (s2 > 0).

X
n
dk Xn
dk d0
ak  VðtÞ þ bk  Vðt  sÞ ¼ 0; 0 VðtÞ , VðtÞ
k¼0
dtk k¼0
dtk dt

d0 X2
dk
0
Vðt  s2 Þ , Vðt  s2 Þ; n ¼ 2; a0 ¼ a1 ¼ a2 ; bk  k Vðt  s2 Þ ¼ 0
dt k¼0
dt

1 X 2
b0 ¼ 1; b1 ¼  Li ; b2
R1 i¼0
X2
d0 d d2
¼ C1  Li ; b0  0 Vðt  s2 Þ þ b1  Vðt  s2 Þ þ b2  2 Vðt  s2 Þ ¼ 0
i¼0
dt dt dt

d0 d
Since 0
Vðt  s2 Þ , Vðt  s2 Þ then b0  Vðt  s2 Þ þ b1  Vðt  s2 Þ þ b2 
dt dt
d2
Vðt  s2 Þ ¼ 0.
dt2
It is well known that if the characteristic equation associated with a linear neutral
equation has roots only with negative real parts, and if all the roots are uniformly
bounded away from the imaginary axis, then the trivial solution of the linear neutral
equation is uniformly asymptotically stable. Thus the stability analysis of power
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 161

limiter second neural differential equation with single delay s2 is very much
equivalent to the problem of determining the conditions under which all roots of its
characteristic equation lie in the half of the complex plane and are uniformly
bounded away from the imaginary axis. In our case ak ¼ 0 then
P P
ð 2k¼0 bk  kk Þ  eks2 ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ 0; QðkÞ ¼ 2k¼0 bk  kk .
Theorem 1.0 if |b2| > 1, then for all s2, there is an infinite number of roots of
P
QðkÞ  eks2 ¼ 0 whose real parts are positive. b2 ¼ C1  2i¼0 Li )
P2
jC1  i¼0 Li j [ 1.
Theorem 2.0 if |b2| > 1, then the trivial solution of power limiter DDE (Delay
Differential Equation) is unstable for all s2 > 0.
Theorem 3.0 Let f ðk; s2 Þ ¼ k2 þ a  k2  eks2 þ gðk; s2 Þ where gðk; s2 Þ is an
analytic function. Assume |a| > 1 and lim Rek [ 0 k12  gðk; s2 Þ ¼ 0 then, for, all s2 [ 0,
jkj ! 1
there is an infinite number of roots of f ðk; s2 Þ ¼ 0 whose real parts are positive. In
fact, there is a sequence {ki} of the roots of f ðk; s2 Þ ¼ 0 such jki j ! 1, and
limi!1 Re ki ¼ s12  ln jaj [ 0 when s2 [ 0.

Theorem 4.0 Let f ðk; s2 Þ ¼ k2 þ gðk; s2 Þ where gðk; s2 Þ is an analytic function.


Assume a ¼ lim Rek [ 0 jk2  gðk; s2 Þj\1 when, as s2 varied, the sum of multiplicities
jkj ! 1
of the roots of f ðk; s2 Þ ¼ 0 in the open right half plane can change only if a root
appears on or crosses the imaginary axis. Back to our second power limiter DDE
which can be considered as the following second order real scalar linear neutral
2Þ 2Þ
2
delay equation: a  d Vðts
dt2 þ b  dVðts
dt þ c  Vðt  s2 Þ ¼ 0 where s2 ; a; b; c are
real constant. To find the equilibrium points (fixed points) of delayed power limiter
circuit is by limt!1 Vðt  s2 Þ ¼ limt!1 VðtÞ 8 t  s2 9 ðt - s2 Þ  t, t ! 1t!1 .
2Þ 2Þ
2
dVðtÞ
dt ¼ 0; dVðts
dt ¼ 0; d Vðts
dt2 ¼ 0 and we get one fixed point c  V ði¼0Þ ¼ 0;
c  V ði¼0Þ ¼ 0 ) c 6¼ 0 ) V ði¼0Þ ¼ 0.
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of delayed circuit consists in adding to coordinate V arbitrarily
small increments of exponential form v  ekt . This leads to a polynomial charac-
teristic equation in the eigenvalues k. The polynomial characteristic equation
accepts by set the below voltage and voltage derivative respect to time in delayed
power limiter differential equation. The delayed circuit fixed values with an arbi-
trarily small increment of exponential form v  ekt is i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1
(second fixed point), etc., VðtÞ ¼ V ðiÞ þ v  ekt

dVðtÞ dVðt  s2 Þ
Vðt  s2 Þ ¼ V ðiÞ þ v  ekðts2 Þ ;¼ v  k  ekt ;
dt dt
ks2 d Vðt  s2 Þ
2
kt
¼vke e ; ¼ v  k  e  eks2
2 kt
dt2
162 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

We choose the above expression for our V(t) as small displacement v from our
circuit fixed points at time t = 0. Vðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V ðiÞ þ v. We get the following char-
acteristic equation: a  k2  eks2 þ b  k  eks2 þ c  eks2 ¼ 0. ða  k2 þ b  k þ cÞ
eks2 ¼ 0. Suppose k ¼ i  x; x [ 0 is the root of ða  k2 þ b  k þ cÞ  eks2 ¼ 0
for some s2 . Euler’s formulas: eixs2 ¼ cosðx  s2 Þ  i  sinðx  s2 Þ. We get
½ðc  a  x2 Þ þ i  b  x  eixs2 ¼ 0 and ðc  a  x2 Þ  cosðx  s2 Þ þ b  x 
sinðx  s2 Þ þ i  ðb  x  cosðx  s2 Þ  ðc  a  x Þ  sinðx  s2 ÞÞ ¼ 0
2
P P
a ¼ C1  2i¼0 Li ; b ¼ R11  2i¼0 Li ; c ¼ 1; x 6¼ 0; x [ 0. We get two equations:

ðc  a  x2 Þ  cosðx  s2 Þ þ b  x  sinðx  s2 Þ
¼ 0; ðb  x  cosðx  s2 Þ  ðc  a  x2 Þ  sinðx  s2 ÞÞ ¼ 0

Thus ðc  a  x2 Þ2 þ ðb  xÞ2 ¼ 0; Hence a2  x4 þ x2  ðb2  2  c aÞ þ c2 ¼ 0.


Its roots are x2 ¼ 2a1 2  ½2  c  a  b2  ððb2  2  c  aÞ2  4  c2  a2 Þ1=2 . We have
two cases for the above equation ðx2 ¼ . . .Þ.
Case (I): ðb2  2  c  aÞ2 ¼ 4  c2  a2 ) b2  ðb2  4  c  aÞ ¼ 0

1 X 2 X2
b ! e;  Li ! e; R1 ! 1 & Li ! e; b2  4  c  a ¼ 0 ) b2
R1 i¼0 i¼0
X2
¼4ca) Li ¼ 4  C1  R21
i¼0

Then x2 ¼ 2a1 2  ½2  c  a  b2  ¼ ac  12  ðbaÞ2


Case (II):

ðb2  2  c  aÞ2 [ 4  c2  a2 ) b2  ðb2  4  c  aÞ [ 0; b2 [ 0 ;


b2  4  c  a [ 0 ) b2 [ 4  c  a
1 X 2
2
X2 X2
1 X 2
 ð Li Þ [ 4  C1  Li ; ð Li Þ  ½  Li  4  C1  [ 0;
R21 i¼0 i¼0 i¼0
R21 i¼0
X
2
1 X 2
1 X
2
ð Li Þ [ 0;  Li  4  C1 [ 0 ) 2  Li [ 4
i¼0
2
R1 i¼0 R1  C1 i¼0

Thus we have two imaginary solutions k ¼ i  x with x þ [ x . We need to


determine the sign of the derivative of Re kðs2 Þ at the points where kðs2 Þ is purely

imaginary. dsd 2 ekðs2 Þs2 ¼ ðdkðs
ds2  s2 þ kÞ  e
kðs2 Þs2

d
ds2 ½a  k2 þ b  k þ c ¼ ð2  a  k þ bÞ  ds
dk
2
dk
. To get the expression for ds 2
we need
to calculate d
ds2 f½a  k2 ðs2 Þ þ b  kðs2 Þ þ c  ekðs2 Þs2 g ¼ 0
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 163

dk k  ða  k2 þ b  k þ cÞ
¼ ;
ds2 a  s2  k2 þ k  ð2  a  b  s2 Þ þ ðb  c  s2 Þ
dk 1 a  s2  k2 þ k  ð2  a  b  s2 Þ þ ðb  c  s2 Þ
ð Þ ¼
ds2 k  ða  k2 þ b  k þ cÞ


If kðs2 Þ ¼ i  x is not simple, then dkðs s2 . Since x 6¼ 0; eixs2 6¼ 0
ds2 ¼ 0 at s2 ¼ 
hence a  ði  xÞ2 þ i  x  b þ c ¼ 0 Which implies ðc  a  x2 Þ þ i  x  b ¼ 0 and
then

X
2
1 X 2
b ¼ 0 & c  a  x2 ¼ 0 ) x2  C 1  Li ¼ 1;  Li ! e
i¼0
R1 i¼0
dk a  s2  k2 þ k  ð2  a  b  s2 Þ þ ðb  c  s2 Þ
signfReð Þ1 gjk¼ix ¼ signfRe½ gjk¼ix
ds2 k  ða  k2 þ b  k þ cÞ
dk 1 a  s2  k þ ð2  a  b  s2 Þ b  c  s2
signReð Þ jk¼ix ¼ signfRe½ þ gjk¼ix
ds2 ða  k þ b  k þ cÞ
2
k  ða  k2 þ b  k þ cÞ

dk 1
Finally, we get the expression for signfReðds 2
Þ gjk¼ix .

dk 1 a  s2  x2  b þ ð2  a  b  s2 Þ  ðc  a  x2 Þ
signfReð Þ gjk¼ix ¼ signf
ds2 ðc  a  x2 Þ2 þ ðx  bÞ2
x2  b  ðb  c  s2 Þ
 g
ðx2  bÞ2 þ x2  ðc  a  x2 Þ2

Since ðc  a  x2 Þ2 þ ðx  bÞ2 [ 0 for any a; b; c; x values we get the


expression:

dk 1
signfReð Þ gjk¼ix ¼ signfa  s2  x2  b þ ð2  a  b  s2 Þ  ðc  a  x2 Þ
ds2
 x2  b  ðb  c  s2 Þg
dk
signfReð Þ1 gjk¼ix ¼ fx2  ½2  a2  b2 þ b  c  s2  þ 2  a  c  b  s2  cg
ds2

dk 1
By inserting the expression for x2 , we can check the sign of fReðds 2
Þ gjk¼ix .
There are two sets of values s2 for which there are imaginary roots:
0 h1 \2p; 0 h2 \2p. sn;1 ¼ xh1þ þ 2pn h2
x þ ; sn;2 ¼ x þ x .
2pn

We choose power limiter critical parameters: Li, R1, C1 and s2 delay parameter
and examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcation) due to parameter
values change or s2 delay change. The analysis consists in identifying the root of
power limiter second DDEs characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of
the complex k—plane, where by changing circuits parameters or s2 delay,
164 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Rek may, at crossing, changes its sign from “−” to “+” i.e. from stable focus E* to
an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining
the sign of the partial derivatives with respect to circuit parameters or delay s2 .

dðRekÞ dðRekÞ
signf gjk¼ix ; signf gjk¼ix xi ¼ R1 ; C1 ; Li
ds2 dxi

We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcations)


in a power limiter system, about the endemic equilibrium point V(i=0) as a result of
the variation of parameters R1, C1, L1 or L2 in shunt mounted limiter diode
equivalent circuit. Our analysis closely follows the procedure described in details in
reference [BK] for the time delay variation parameter s2 . We keep s2 fixed and
inspect stability switching for variation of parameters R1, C1, L1 or L2 respectively.
We already got the expression for the second power limiter differential equation
which lead the characteristic equation for the eigenvalue k having the form
P P
ð 2k¼0 bk  kk Þ  eks2 ¼ 0 ; PðkÞ ¼ 0 ; QðkÞ ¼ 2k¼0 bk  kk where b0 ¼ 1; b1 =
P2 P2
R1  i¼0 Li ; b2 ¼ C1  i¼0 Li ; ak ¼ 0. We do a little parameters terminology
1

change: k ! j; bk ! cj and we get the following characteristic equation for the


P P
eigenvalue k : ð 2j¼0 cj  k j Þ  eks2 ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ 0; QðkÞ ¼ 2j¼0 cj  k j where
P P
c0 ¼ 1; c1 ¼ R11  2i¼0 Li ; c2 ¼ C1  2i¼0 Li ; aj ¼ 0.
Remark: Do not confuse between ci parameters and C1 capacitor element in a
power limiter equivalent circuit and the coefficients faj ðR1 ; C1 ; Li Þ;
cj ðR1 ; C1 ; Li Þg 2 R.
Depend on R1, C1, and Li, but not on s2 . Unless strictly necessary, the desig-
nation of the variable arguments (R1, C1, Li) will subsequently be omitted from P,
Q, aj, cj.
The coefficients aj ; cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their
arguments, and direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0 8 R1 ; C1 ; Li 2 < þ ; in our
case: a0 ¼ 0; c0 ¼ 1 ) a0 þ c0 ¼ 1 6¼ 0. i.e., k ¼ 0 is not a root of a power limiter
characteristic equation. Furthermore, PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions of k, for
which the following requirements of the analysis [BK] can also be verified in the
present case:
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R, then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0 i.e. P and Q have no com-
mon imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
(R1, C1, Li) domain of interest.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Re k
0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
Indeed, in the limit jQðkÞ=PðkÞj ¼ Oðjc2 =a3 kjÞ ! 0:
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 has at most a finite number of zeros. Indeed,
this is a bi-cubic polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðR1 ; C1 ; Li Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 being continuous and differen-
tiable with respect to R1, C1, Li. This condition can only be assessed
numerically.
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 165

In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have


Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ; thus k ¼ i  x may be an eigen-
value of the characteristic equation. The analysis consists in identifying the roots of
the characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k plane,
where, by increasing the parameter R1, and/or C1 and/or Li, Re k may, at the
crossing, changes its sign from “−” to “+”, i.e. from a stable focus V(*) to an
unstable one, or vice versa [5, 6]. This feature may be further assessed by exam-
ining the sign of the partial derivatives with respect to R1, C1, and Li.
Reminder: We keep s2 fixed.

@Re k @Re k
K1 ðR1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; Li ¼ const:; ; K1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; R1 ; Li
@R1 k¼ix @C1 k¼ix
¼ const:;

K1 ðLi Þ ¼ ð@ Re k
@Li Þk¼ix ; R1 ; C1 ¼ const:; The subscripts k; x; R1 ; C1 ; Li indicate
the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on KðR1 Þ, remem-
bering that kðR1 ; C1 ; Li Þ; xððR1 ; C1 ; Li Þ, and keeping C1, Li and s2 fixed. The
derivation closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiating characteristic
equation with respect to R1, and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one
calculates:

@k 1 Pk ðk; R1 Þ  Qðk; R1 Þ þ Qk ðk; R1 Þ  Pðk; R1 Þ  s2  Pðk; R1 Þ  Qðk; R1 Þ


ð Þ ¼ð Þ
@R1 PR1 ðk; R1 Þ  Qðk; R1 Þ  QR1 ðk; R1 Þ  Pðk; R1 Þ

where Pk ¼ @P=@k; . . .; etc. Substituting k ¼ i  x, and bear in mind that


Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ, i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ and
i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ, and that on the surface exist jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one
obtains:

@k 1 i  Px ði  x; R1 Þ  Pði  x; R1 Þ  i  Qk ði  x; R1 Þ  Qðk; R1 Þ  s2  jPði  x; R1 Þj2


ð Þ jk¼ix ¼ ð Þ
@R1 PR1 ði  x; R1 Þ  Pði  x; R1 Þ  QR1 ði  x; R1 Þ  Qði  x; R1 Þ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ; Q ¼


QR þ i  QI ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; PR1 ¼ PRR1 þ i  PIR1 ; QR1 ¼
QRR1 þ i  QIR1 ; P2 ¼ P2I þ P2R , retaining the real part, and noting that the operators
∂ and Re commute, one come up, after some straightforward algebraic manipula-
tions, with the following result:
166 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

2  P2 U  xR1 þ V
KðR1 Þ ¼  Fx  ðs2  xR1 þ Þ;
FR1 þ 4  V
2 2 P2
PðkÞ ¼ 0 ) Pði  xÞ ¼ 0 ) PR ¼ PI ¼ 0
PRx ¼ PIx ¼ PRR1 ¼ PIR1 ¼ 0;
X
2
1 X 2 X2
QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j ¼ 1 þ ð Li Þ  k þ C1  ð L i Þ  k2
j¼0
R1 i¼0 i¼0

X
2
1 X 2 X2
Qðk ¼ i  xÞ ¼ cj  k j ¼ 1 þ i ð Li Þ  x  C1  ð Li Þ  x2 ;
j¼0
R1 i¼0 i¼0

X
2 X
2
1 X 2
Qði  xÞ ¼ cj  k j ¼ f1  C1  ð Li Þ  x2 g þ i ð Li Þ  x
j¼0 i¼0
R1 i¼0

X
2
1 X 2
@QR
QR ¼ 1  C1  ð Li Þ  x2 ; QI ¼ ð Li Þ  x; QRx ¼
i¼0
R1 i¼0 @x
X
2
@QI 1 X 2
¼ 2  x  C1  ð Li Þ; QIx ¼ ¼ ð Li Þ
i¼0
@x R1 i¼0

@QR 1 X 2
U  xR1 þ V
QRR1 ¼ ¼ 0; QIR1 ¼  2  ð Li Þ  x; P2 ! 0;  s2  xR1
@R1 R1 i¼0 P2
2
KðR1 Þ !  Fx  ðU  xR1 þ VÞ
FR21 þ 4  V 2

Where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments (i  x, R1), and where
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ
FR1 ¼ 2  ½ðPRR1  PR þ PIR1  PI Þ  ðQRR1  QR þ QIR1  QI Þ; xR1 ¼ FR1 =Fx

and we get the expressions based on power limiter equivalent parameters:

X
2 X
2
1
Fx ¼ 2  x  ð Li Þ  ½2  C1  ð Li Þ  f2  x2  C12 þ g;
i¼0 i¼0
R21
2  x2 X 2
FR1 ¼  ð Li Þ2
R31 i¼0
P
FR1 x  ð 2i¼0 Li Þ
xR1 ¼  ¼
Fx P
2
R31  ½2  C1  ð Li Þ  f2  x2  C12 þ 1
R21
g
i¼0
U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ;
V ¼ ðPR  PIR1  PI  PRR1 Þ  ðQR  QIR1  QI  QRR1 Þ
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 167

1 X 2 X 2
U¼ ð Li Þ  f1 þ C1  x2  ð Li Þg;
R1 i¼0 i¼0

1 X 2 X2
V¼  ð L i Þ  x  ½1  C 1  ð Li Þ  x2 
R21 i¼0 i¼0

where x 2 R þ . If K(R1) > 0, K(C1) > 0, K(Li) > 0 (or <0), then the crossing
proceeds from “−” to “+” (or from “+” to “−”), respectively. Without loss of
generality, one may consider only k ¼ ix, x > 0 and ignore its complex conjugate.
Writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ; QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ and inserting k ¼ i  x
into characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sinðx  s2 Þ ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2

PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cosðx  s2 Þ ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of the above requirement, and ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows from the above equations that, by squaring and adding
sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
And the above sin/cos equations, of course, are identical to those in reference
[BK], except that the variable arguments are R1, C1, and Li instead of s2 . Note that F
(x) is independent of s2 ; Thus equation (sin/cos) implies F(x), but not the other way
around. The real and imaginary parts of P and Q are discussed, while F and some of
its elementary properties are presented. One first solves the polynomial F(x),
retaining only the real positive roots x, and discarding the others. The result is a 2D
manifold (surface) x = x(R1, C1) in a three dimensional (3D) space (R1, C1, x),
where x is a continuous and differentiable with respect to its arguments, with the
possible exception of infinite derivatives on 1D continuous lines. Next, one checks
which x’s on the surface also satisfy both (sin/cos) equations for some fixed value of
s2 . This operation results in one, or several continuous lines on the surface. The
projection of these lines on the (R1, C1) plane gives the loci of possible stability
transitions of the dynamical system.
Remark: We can exchange R1 or C1 by Li in the 2D manifold (surface) or in a
three dimensional (3D) space.
We can give the sign of K(R1), without the leading positive factor by:

@Re k 1
signð Þ jk¼ix ¼ signKðR1 Þ; signKðR1 Þ
@R1
U  xR1 þ V
¼ signðFx Þ  signðs2  xR1 þ Þ
P2
168 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

We need now to do the same procedure for C1 parameter and get the expression:

@Rek
K1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; R1 ; Li ¼ const:; ;
@C1 k¼ix
PðkÞ ¼ 0 ) Pði  xÞ ¼ 0 ) PR ¼ PI ¼ 0
PRx ¼ PIx ¼ PRC1 ¼ PIC1 ¼ 0; PC1 ¼ PRC1 þ i  PIC1 ;
X
2
1 X 2
QR ¼ 1  C1  ð Li Þ  x2 ; QI ¼ ð Li Þ  x
i¼0
R1 i¼0
@QR X2
@QI
QRC1 ¼ ¼ ð Li Þ  x2 ; QIC1 ¼ ¼ 0;
@C1 i¼0
@C 1

@Q
P ¼ 0 ) P2 ¼ 0; QC1 ¼ ¼ QRC1 þ i  QIC1
@C1

Fx expression is the same. FC1 ¼ 2  ½ðPRC1  PR þ PIC1  PI Þ  ðQRC1  QR þ QIC1  QI Þ


P
xC ¼ FC1 =Fx ; The expression for FC1 is FC1 ¼ 2  ð 2i¼0 Li Þ  x2  ½1  C1 
P2 1
ð i¼0 Li Þ  x2 

P
2
x  ½1  C1  ð Li Þ  x2 
FC i¼0
x C1 ¼ 1 ¼
Fx P
2
2  C1  ð Li Þ  f2  x2  C12 þ 1
R21
g
i¼0

U expression is the same like our previous calculation.

V ¼ ðPR  PIC1  PI  PRC1 Þ  ðQR  QIC1  QI  QRC1 Þ ; V


X2
1 X 2
x3 X 2
¼ ð Li Þ  x2   ð Li Þ  x ¼  ð Li Þ2
i¼0
R1 i¼0
R 1 i¼0

@Rek 1
signð Þ jk¼ix ¼ signKðC1 Þ ; sign KðC1 Þ
@C1
U  xC1 þ V
¼ signðFx Þ  signðs2  xC1 þ Þ
P2

U is always less than zero (U < 0). V for parameter R1: if x > 0 then V > 0 for
P
C1  ð 2i¼0 Li Þ  x2 \1 otherwise V < 0. V for parameter C1: If x > 0 then V < 0.
Now we choose our parameter L1.
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 169

X
3
PI ¼ PR ¼ 0 ) P2 ¼ 0; PIL1 ¼ PRL1 ¼ 0 Li ¼ L1 þ L2 þ L3 ;
i¼1
P3 P3 P3
@ Li @ Li @ @Q Li
i¼1
¼ i¼1
¼ i¼1
¼ 1; QL1 ¼
¼ QRL1 þ i  QIL1
@L1 @L2 @L3 @L1
P
3 P3
@ Li @ Li
@QR @QI x x
QRL1 ¼ ¼ C1  x2  i¼1 ¼ C1  x2 ; QIL1 ¼ ¼  i¼1 ¼
@L1 @L1 @L1 R1 @L1 R1
FL1 ¼ 2  ½ðPRL1  PR þ PIL1  PI Þ  ðQRL1  QR þ QIL1  QI Þ;
X
3
1
FL1 ¼ 2  x2  ½C1  ð Li Þ  fC12  x2 þ g
i¼1
R21

P
3
x  ½C1  ð
Li Þ  fC12  x2 þ R12 g
FL1 i¼1 1
xL1 ¼ ¼ 3
Fx P P3
ð Li Þ  ½2  C1  ð Li Þ  f2  C12  x2 þ 1
R21
g
i¼1 i¼1

U expression is the same like our previous calculation.


V ¼ ðPR  PIL1  PI  PRL1 Þ  ðQR  QIL1  QI  QRL1 Þ; V ¼  Rx1 ; If x > 0 then
V < 0 always. Retaining the real part, and noting that the operators ∂ and Re
commute, one come up, after some straightforward algebraic manipulations, with
the following result:

2  P2 U  x L1 þ V @Re k 1
KðL1 Þ ¼  Fx  ðs2  xL1 þ Þ; signð Þ jk¼ix
þ4  V
FL21 2 P 2 @L1
¼ sign KðL1 Þ

U  xL1 þ V
sign KðL1 Þ ¼ signðFx Þ  signðs2  xL1 þ Þ
P2

Our switching analysis results are the same if we move from L1 parameter to L2
or to L3 since the partial derivatives are the same.
Summary: We take the assumption that Vi(t) is an incoming signal width
Dt\s1 ; s2 ; Dt ! e. There are three time intervals which we analyze our power
limiter microstrip line system. The first time interval is s1 [ t [ 0, the coming
signal not yet pass the first delay line ðs1 Þ and VA, V, Vout respectively equal to
zero. The second time interval is s1 þ s2 [ t
s1 , the signal has not yet passed the
second delay line ðs2 Þ and mutual interaction between the signal and power limiter
equivalent circuit gives V(t) which is the voltage on resistor R1 and capacitor C1.
The dynamical analysis is done by using forced Van der Pol equation. The forcing
signal X(t) is the coming RF signal. The third time interval is t
s1 þ s2 , the
incoming signal passes both the first and second delay lines and the dynamical
170 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

behavior analysis is done by using Delay Differential Equation (DDE) and stability
switching analysis. For simplicity, we consider Vout ! e after s1 + s2 second.
In our analysis we consider the incoming RF signal to power limiter input
circuit, has time interval Dt. We choose Dt, Dt\s1 ; s2 . The incoming RF signal
time interval is less than delay lines times s1 ; s2 . First the incoming RF signal cause
to the voltage V (on shunt mounted limiter equivalent circuit’s R1, C1 elements).
The analysis is based on the Van der Pol’s equation. Second, we analyze output
voltage according to Delay Differential Equation (DDE), V is the main equation
variable in time [39–41] (Fig. 2.3).
Power limiter with microstrip transmission line system stability switching
analysis is done according geometric stability switch criteria [BK] in delay differ-
ential system with delay dependent variables. The first analysis is a power limiter
microstrip system with incoming RF signal. By using Van der Pol topology we find
V(t) voltage after s1 . The second analysis is power limiter microstrip system output

Vin
Incoming Incoming RF
RF signal Signal after first delay line

V t

Vo t [sec]

V t
DD

Van Der
Pol

Fig. 2.3 Shunt mounted limiter diode equivalent circuit with microstrip lines delayed time
diagram
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 171

differential equation with delay variable in time Vðt  s2 Þ. V is the power limiter
equivalent circuit’s voltage on R1 and C1 . For the second analysis, we find out
system general characteristic equation Dðk; s2 Þ. Find Fðx; s2 Þ for each s2 has at
most a finite number of real zeros. Find x; s2 values which fulfill Fðx; s2 Þ ¼ 0;
xðs2 Þ, only for those values can be stability switching (first condition). Next is to
find those x; s2 values which fulfill the expressions, it is the second condition for
stability switching sinðx  s2 Þ ¼ . . . cosðx  s2 Þ ¼ . . .. If K(R1) > 0, K(C1) > 0,
K(Li) > 0 then the crossing proceeds from “−” to “+” respectively (stable to
unstable). If K(R1) < 0, K(C1) < 0, K(Li) < 0 then the crossing proceeds from “+”
to “−” respectively (unstable to stable). The analysis consists in identifying the
roots of microstrip power limiter circuit characteristic equation P(k) + Q(k)  exp
(−k  s2) = 0 situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k—plane, where, by
increasing the circuit parameters R1, C1, Li. Rek may, at the crossing, change its
sign from “−” to “+”, i.e. from a stable focus V* to an unstable one, or vice versa.
This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives
with respect to microstrip power limiter circuit parameters R1, C1, Li.

2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase


Shifter (RTPS) Circuit Transmission Lines Delayed
in Time System Stability Analysis

Active circulator consisting of three ports, namely P1, P2 and P3. Active circulator is
a three terminal device in which input from one port is transmitted to the next port
in rotation. The active circulator acts as an isolator between the input and the output
signal so that phase shift is well observed. The RF input signal is given at P1 of the
circulator from the left side. This signal from P1 is transmitted to P2. We can
connect LC (L1, C1) components in series to P2 port which results in phase shift and
helps to reflect the signal to P3 at the right. At P3 we get an output RF signal. Each
active circulator terminal faces a delay parasitic effect of signal transferring in time
[25, 26, 35] (Fig. 2.4).
Our circuit is a Reflection Type Phase Shifter (RTPS), employing a circulator. In
the past was little interest in actively circulators since its narrow bandwidth and
problems associated with a hybrid realization. We use active circulators since their
bandwidths have increased considerably as a result of the advances in transistor
technology. Active circulators are ideally suited for realization using MMIC tech-
nology. The circuit employs decade bandwidth active circulator which shows very
low phase error characteristic. Additionally the phase shifter exhibits an excellent
input return loss performance across this decade bandwidth. The circuit configu-
ration of the active circulator used three MESFETs which are the GEC-Marconi
standard library cell F20-FET-4x75. As with all the standard library cells, a very
accurate, ultra-wideband small signal models of the device. MESFET stands for
metal semiconductor field effect transistor. It is similar to a JFET in construction
172 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Fig. 2.4 Three ports decade


bandwidth active circulator
with micro strip delay lines
and LC phase shifter in port
P2

and terminology. The difference is that instead of using a p-n junction for the gate, a
Schottky (metal semiconductor) junction is used. A typical three ports decade
bandwidth active circulator has three MESFETs transistors interconnected with
each other. RF, CF, LF, CC, Rsb plays a major role in the working of the circuit. The
three feedback branches (RF, CF, LF) are used to link all the three transistors in an
end to end fashion. The source resistor (Rsb) is shared among all the three
MESFETs transistors and one transistor is source coupled with the other two
transistors using this source resistor. The circuit works in a symmetric fashion. We
consider MESFET high frequency model taking node capacitors into account.
Figure 2.5 describes the circuit configuration of the active circulator [35, 36].
In Fig. 2.5 we use N-type MESFET but usually the recommended is a sym-
metrical bilateral MESFET. All Cc and Cf capacitors are un-polarized. Once we
inject RF signal to port P1, it passes to port P2 through a feedback branch (RF, CF,
LF). The same is between ports P2 and P3, ports P3 and P1. In case we inject RF signal
to port P2, it reaches the Q1 gate and shorten the Q1’s drain and source. Then Port 2’s
RF signal is shortened to ground through resistor Rsb and didn’t reach port P1.

Fig. 2.5 Circuit


configuration of the active
circulator
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 173

Fig. 2.6 Active circulator system path equivalent circuit

The same is between P1 to P3 and P3 to P2. We consider a varactor which is realized


by connecting together the drain and source terminations of a standard MESFET—
resulting in a Schottky junction. The bias potential is then applied across the
drain/source and gate terminations. Our three ports decade bandwidth active cir-
culator with micro strip delay lines and LC phase shifter in port P2 gets his input RF
signal from the antenna (port P1) and feeds receiver unit by active circulator output
RF signal (Port P3) [1, 2]. The active circulator system can be described by the
system path from RFin port (P1) to RFout port (P3). For simplicity, we ignore
MESFET high frequency equivalent model and took it as a cutoff element in our
system. Figure 2.6 describes our system path from Antenna RF coming signal to the
receiver unit (Rx). Active circulator system path equivalent circuit fulfills current
equation: I1 ¼ I2 þ I3 .
We have three main variables in our active circulator system V1(t), V2(t), V3(t).
I1, I2, I3 are the currents through related branches. We describe system, differential
dVcf
equations. First branch: I1 ¼ Cf  dt ; VLf ¼ Lf  dIdt1 ; I1 ¼ Cc  dVdtcc

d 1 1
½Vcf þ Vcc  ¼ I1  ½ þ ; V1  V2 ¼ Vcf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC ;
dt Cf Cc
dI1
Vcf þ Vcc ¼ V1  V2  Lf   I1  Rf
dt
d dV1 dV2 d 2 I1 dI1
½Vcf þ Vcc  ¼   Lf  2   Rf ;
dt dt dt dt dt
1 1 dV1 dV2 d 2 I1 dI1
I1  ½ þ  ¼   Lf  2   Rf
Cf Cc dt dt dt dt

dVc1 dVc1
Second branch: I2 ¼ C1  dt ; VL1 ¼ L1  dIdt2 ; Vc1 ¼ V2  L1  dIdt2 ; I2 ¼ C1  dt
2
¼ C1  ½dV
dt  L1  dt2 .
2 d I2
174 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

dVcf
Third branch: I3 ¼ Cf  dt ; VLf ¼ Lf  dIdt3 ; I3 ¼ Cc  dVdtcc

d 1 1
½Vc þ Vcc  ¼ I3  ½ þ ; V2  V3 ¼ Vcf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC ;
dt f Cf Cc
dI3
Vcf þ Vcc ¼ V2  V3  Lf   I3  Rf
dt
d dV2 dV3 d 2 I3 dI3
½Vcf þ Vcc  ¼   Lf  2   Rf ;
dt dt dt dt dt
1 1 dV2 dV3 d 2 I3 dI3
I3  ½ þ  ¼   Lf  2   Rf
Cf Cc dt dt dt dt

We can summarize our system, differential equations:

1 1 dV1 dV2 d 2 I1 dI1 dV2 d 2 I2


I1  ½ þ  ¼   Lf  2   Rf ; I2 ¼ C1  ½  L1  2 
Cf Cc dt dt dt dt dt dt

1 1 dV2 dV3 d 2 I3 dI3


I3  ½ þ ¼   Lf  2   Rf
Cf Cc dt dt dt dt

We implement Rx (receiver) unit with an equivalent circuit of the input section


of the receiver. The receiver’s amplifier is modeled as a noiseless amplifier pre-
ceded by noise voltage and noise current generators representing amplifier noise
referred to the input. The active circulator’s RFout port is connected to the amplifier
by a transformer with turns ratio m. We shall assume that this is an ideal trans-
former. Figure 2.7 describes the receiver input equivalent circuit.
We can consider the above equivalent circuit as resistor Ra, La, and Lt in the
series. V3 ¼ I3  Ra þ ðLa þ Lt Þ  dIdt3 . After we integrated Rx unit differential equation
into our system, differential equations we get the following new system differential
equations:

Fig. 2.7 Receiver input equivalent circuit


2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 175

   
1 1 dV1 dV2 d 2 I1 dI1 dV2 d 2 I2
I1  þ ¼   Lf  2   Rf ; I2 ¼ C1   L1  2
Cf Cc dt dt dt dt dt dt
 
1 1 dV2 d 2 I3 dI3
I3  þ ¼  ðLf þ La þ Lt Þ  2   ðRf þ Ra Þ
Cf Cc dt dt dt
 
dV2 d 2 I2 dV2 1 d 2 I2
I2 ¼ C1   L1  2 ) ¼  I 2 þ L1  2
dt dt dt C1 dt

We get two main systems, differential equations:

1 1 dV1 1 d 2 I2 d 2 I1 dI1
I1  ½ þ  ¼   I2  L1  2  Lf  2   Rf
Cf Cc dt C1 dt dt dt
1 1 1 d 2 I2 d 2 I3 dI3
I3  ½ þ  ¼  I2 þ L1  2  ðLf þ La þ Lt Þ  2   ðRf þ Ra Þ
Cf Cc C1 dt dt dt

Since I1 ¼ I2 þ I3 ) I2 ¼ I1  I3 we get the following system, differential


equations:

1 1 dV1 1 1 d 2 I1 d 2 I3
I1  ½ þ  ¼   I1 þ  I 3  L1  2 þ L 1  2
Cf Cc dt C1 C1 dt dt
d 2 I1 dI1
 Lf    Rf
dt2 dt
1 1 1 1 d 2 I1
I3  ½ þ  ¼  I1   I 3 þ L1  2
Cf Cc C1 C1 dt
d 2 I3 dI3
 ðLf þ La þ Lt þ L1 Þ    ðRf þ Ra Þ
dt2 dt
dI1 dI3 d 2 I1 dI 0 d 2 I3 dI 0
¼ I10 ; ¼ I30 ; 2 ¼ 1 ; 2 ¼ 3
dt dt dt dt dt dt

We get a new set of system, differential equations:

1 1 1 dV1 1 dI 0 dI 0
I1  ½ þ þ ¼ þ  I3 þ L1  3  ðLf þ L1 Þ  1  I10  Rf
Cf Cc C1 dt C1 dt dt

1 1 1 1 dI 0 dI 0
I3  ½ þ þ ¼  I1 þ L1  1  ðLf þ La þ Lt þ L1 Þ  3  I30  ðRf þ Ra Þ;
Cf Cc C1 C1 dt dt
dI1 dI
¼ I10 ; ¼ I30
3
dt dt

For simplicity we define: CR ¼ C1f þ C1c þ C11 and LR ¼ Lf þ La þ Lt þ L1 and


get the following system, differential equations:
176 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

dV1 1 dI 0 dI 0
I1  C R ¼ þ  I3 þ L1  3  ðLf þ L1 Þ  1  I10  Rf ; I3  CR
dt C1 dt dt
1 dI10 dI30 dI1 dI3
¼  I 1 þ L1   LR   I30  ðRf þ Ra Þ; ¼ I10 ; ¼ I30
C1 dt dt dt dt
dI10 dI30
From the above differential equation, we get the expressions for dt and dt :

dI10 dV1 1 ðLRLC


1
 CR Þ ðC11  L1LCR R Þ
¼  þ 1
 I 1 þ
dt dt fLf þ L1  ð1  LL1 Þg fLf þ L1  ð1  LL1 Þg fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg
R R
Rf L1  ðRf þ Ra Þ
 I3   I0   I0
fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg 1 fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg 3

For simplicity we define the following parameters:

1 ðLRLC
1
 CR Þ ðC11  L1LCR R Þ
C0 ¼ ; C1 ¼ 1
; C2 ¼ ;
fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg
Rf L1  ðRf þ Ra Þ
C3 ¼  ; C4 ¼ 
fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg
dI10 dV1
¼  C0 þ C1  I1 þ C2  I3 þ C3  I10 þ C4  I30
dt dt
dI30 dV1 L1  C0 1 L1  C1 L1  C2 CR
¼  þ½ þ   I1 þ ½    I3
dt dt LR LR  C1 LR LR LR
L1  C3 0 L1  C4 ðRf þ Ra Þ 0
þ  I1 þ ½    I3
LR LR LR

dI30 dV1 L1  C0 1 1 1 L1  C3
¼  þ  ½ þ L1  C1   I1 þ  ½L1  C2  CR   I3 þ
dt dt LR LR C1 LR LR
1
 I10 þ  ½L1  C4  ðRf þ Ra Þ  I30
LR

For simplicity we define the following parameters:

L1  C0 1 1 1
C5 ¼ ; C6 ¼  ½ þ L1  C1 ; C7 ¼  ½L1  C2  CR ;
LR LR C1 LR
L1  C3 1
C8 ¼ ; C9 ¼  ½L1  C4  ðRf þ Ra Þ
LR LR
dI30 dV1
¼  C5 þ C6  I1 þ C7  I3 þ C8  I10 þ C9  I30
dt dt

We can summarize our active circulator system, differential equations for


coming antenna signal and Rx unit. dIdt1 ¼ I10 ; dIdt3 ¼ I30
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 177

dI10 dV1 dI 0
¼  C0 þ C1  I1 þ C2  I3 þ C3  I10 þ C4  I30 ; 3
dt dt dt
dV1 0 0
¼  C5 þ C6  I1 þ C7  I3 þ C8  I1 þ C9  I3
dt

We have four system variables: I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 and coming RFin signal V1(t). We
can write the above system, differential equations in a form of matrix representa-
tion: C5 ¼ LLR1  C0
0 1
dI1
B dt C
B C
B C 0 1 0 I1 1 0 0 1
B dI3 C !11 . . . !14
B C BI C B0 C
B dt C B . .. C dV1 ðtÞ
B C B .. C B 3C B C
B dI 0 C ¼@ .. . . AB C þ B C  C0 
@ I10 A @ 1 A
; !11 ¼ 0;
B 1C dt
B C !41    !44
B dt C I0 L1
B C 3 LR
@ dI A
0
3
dt
!12 ¼ 0; !13 ¼ 1; !14 ¼ 0; !21 ¼ 0; !22 ¼ 0

!23 ¼ 0; !24 ¼ 1; !31 ¼ C1 ; !32 ¼ C2 ; !33 ¼ C3 ; !34 ¼ C4 ; !41 ¼ C6 ; !42


¼ C7 ; !43 ¼ C8 ; !44 ¼ C9

We consider RFin signal V1(t) = A0 + f(t); |f(t)| <= 1 and A0  |f(t)| then
V1 ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ  A0 ) dVdt1 ðtÞ ! e. We can write our matrix representation:
e!0
0 1
dI1
B dt C 0 1
B C
B dI3 C 0 1 I1
B C !11 . . . !14 BI C
B dt C B . .. .. C B 3 C
B C
B dI 0 C ¼ @ .. . . AB Cþe
@ I10 A
B 1C
B dt C !41    !44
B C
@ dI 0 A I30
3
dt

Due to active circulator’s micro strip transmission line delays s1 in the first
port’s current and s3 for the third port current. Accordingly, active circulator’s
micro strip transmission lines, delays D1 for the first port current derivative and D3
for the third port current derivative. I1 ðtÞ ! I1 ðt  s1 Þ; I3 ðtÞ ! I3 ðt  s3 Þ
I10 ðtÞ ! I10 ðt  D1 Þ; I30 ðtÞ ! I30 ðt  D3 Þ. We consider no delay effect on
0 0
dI1 dI3 dI1 dI3
dt ; dt ; dt ; dt .
Active circulator’s micro strip transmission lines parasitic effects
influence only on P1 and P3 current and current derivatives I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 (I2 ; I20 which
are a hidden variable in our analysis).
178 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

0 1
dI1
B dt C 0 1
B C
B dI3 C 0 1 I1 ðt  s1 Þ
B C !11 . . . !14 B C
B dt C B . .. .. C B I3 ðt  s3 Þ C
B C¼@ .
B dI 0 C . . . AB Cþe
@ I10 ðt  D1 Þ A
B 1C
B dt C ! 41    !44
B C
@ dI 0 A I30 ðt  D3 Þ
3
dt

To find equilibrium points (fixed points) of the active circulator system is by

lim I1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ I1 ðtÞ; lim I3 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ I3 ðtÞ; lim I10 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ I10 ðtÞ;


t!1 t!1 t!1
dI1 dI3
lim I 0 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ I30 ðtÞ; ¼ ¼0
t!1 3 dt dt
dI10 dI30
¼ ¼ 0 8 t  s1 ; t  s3 ; t  D1 ; t  D3 9 ðt  s1 Þ  t; ðt  s3 Þ  t;
dt dt
ðt  D1 Þ  t; ðt  D3 Þ  t; t ! 1

We get four equations and the only one fixed point is C7  C6CC1 2 6¼ 0

C6  C2 ð0Þ ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ


C7  6¼ 0 ) E ð0Þ ðI1 ; I3 ; I1 ; I3 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0Þ
C1

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the active circulator system consists in adding to coordinate
½I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30  arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03   ekt , and
retaining the first order terms in ½I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 . The system of four homogeneous
equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues k. The
polynomial characteristics equations accept by set the below currents and currents
derivative respect to time into active circulator system equations. Active circulator
system fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03   ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third
fixed point), etc.,

ðjÞ ðjÞ 0 ðjÞ


I1 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i1  ekt ; I3 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i3  ekt ; I10 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i01  ekt ; I30 ðtÞ
0 ðjÞ
¼ I3 þ i03  ekt

We choose the above expressions for our I1 ðtÞ; I3 ðtÞ and I10 ðtÞ; I30 ðtÞ as a small
displacement ½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03  from the active circulator system fixed points at time
ðjÞ ðjÞ 0 ðjÞ
t = 0. I1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i1 ; I3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i3 ; I10 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i01 ; I30 ðt ¼ 0Þ
0 ðjÞ
¼ I3 þ i03 .
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 179

For k [ 0; t [ 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k [ 0; t [ 0 is


Unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for
k [ 0; t [ 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is
the eigenvalue parameter which establishes if the fixed point is stable or Unstable,
additionally his absolute value ðjkjÞ establishes the speed of flow toward or away
from the selected fixed point [3, 4] (Table 2.1).
The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for active
circulator system currents and currents derivatives respect to time are

ðiÞ ðiÞ
dI1 ðtÞ I1 ðt þ DtÞ  I1 ðtÞ I þ i1  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½I1 þ i1  ekt 
¼ lim ¼ lim 1
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
i1  ekt  ½ekDt  1 ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ lim ! k  i1  ekt
Dt!0 Dt
dI3 ðtÞ dI 0 ðtÞ dI 0 ðtÞ
¼ k  i3  ekt ; 1 ¼ k  i01  ekt ; 3 ¼ k  i03  ekt
dt dt dt
dI1 ðt  s1 Þ dI ðt  s Þ
¼ k  i1  ekt  eks1 ; ¼ k  i3  ekt  eks3
3 3
dt dt
dI10 ðt  D1 Þ dI 0 ðt  D1 Þ
¼ k  i01  ekt  ekD1 ; 3 ¼ k  i03  ekt  ekD3
dt dt

First, we take the active circulator’s currents I1, I3 differential equations: dIdt1 ¼
I10 ; dIdt3 ¼ I30 and adding coordinates ½I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30  arbitrarily small increments of
exponential terms ½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03   ekt and retaining the first order terms in i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 .

Table 2.1 Active circulator system eigenvalues options


k<0 k>0
t=0 ðjÞ ðjÞ
I1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i1 I1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i3 I3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i3
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
I10 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i01 I10 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i01
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
I30 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i03 I30 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i03
ðjÞ ðjÞ
t>0 I1 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i1  ejkjt I1 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i1  ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I3 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i3  ejkjt I3 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i3  ejkjt
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
I30 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i03  ejkjt I30 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i03  ejkjt
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
I30 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i03  ejkjt I30 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i03  ejkjt
ðiÞ
t>0 I1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ I1 I1 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  i1  ejkjt
t!∞
I3 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
ðiÞ
I3 I3 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  i3  ejkjt

I10 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
0ðiÞ
I1 I10 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  i01  ejkjt

I30 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
0ðiÞ
I3 I30 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  i3  ejkjt
180 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

0 ðiÞ 0 ði¼0Þ
k  i1  ekt ¼ I1 þ i01  ekt ; I1 ¼ 0 ) k  i1 þ i01 ¼ 0
0 ðiÞ 0 ði¼0Þ
k  i3  ekt ¼ I3 þ i03  ekt ; I3 ¼ 0 ) k  i3 þ i03 ¼ 0

Second, we take the active circulator’s currents derivative I10 ; I30 differential
equations:

dI10 dV1 dI 0
¼  C0 þ C1  I1 þ C2  I3 þ C3  I10 þ C4  I30 ; 3
dt dt dt
dV1 0 0
¼  C5 þ C6  I1 þ C7  I3 þ C8  I1 þ C9  I3
dt
0 0
dV1
dt  C0 ! e; dV dt  C5 ! e and adding coordinates ½I1 ; I3 ; I1 ; I3  arbitrarily small
1

increments of exponential terms ½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03   ekt and retaining the first order terms
in i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 .
ðjÞ ðjÞ 0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
k  i01  ekt ¼ C1  ðI1 þ i1  ekt Þ þ C2  ðI3 þ i3  ekt Þ þ C3  ðI1 þ i01  ekt Þ þ C4  ðI3 þ i03  ekt Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ 0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
k  i03  ekt ¼ C6 ðI1 þ i1  ekt Þ þ C7  ðI3 þ i3  ekt Þ þ C8  ðI1 þ i01  ekt Þ þ C9  ðI3 þ i03  ekt Þ
ðj¼0Þ ðj¼0Þ 0ðj¼0Þ 0ðj¼0Þ
I1 ¼ 0 ; I3 ¼ 0 ; I1 ¼ 0 ; I3 ¼0
ðk þ C3 Þ  i01 þ C1  i1 þ C2  i3 þ C4  i03 ¼ 0 ; ðk þ C9 Þ  i03 þ C6  i1 þ C7  i3 þ C8  i01 ¼ 0

Remark: It is reader exercise to find system Jacobian matrix and to investigate


stability based on system eigenvalues. The system has four eigenvalues:
k1 ; k2 ; k3 ; k4 :
We define I1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ I1ðiÞ þ i1  ekðts1 Þ ; I3 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ I3ðiÞ þ i3  ekðts3 Þ I10 ðt  D1 Þ ¼
I1 ðiÞ þ i01  ekðtD1 Þ ; I30 ðt  D3 Þ ¼ I30 ðiÞ þ i03  ekðtD3 Þ then we get four delayed dif-
0

ferential equations with respect to coordinates ½I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30  arbitrarily small incre-
dI10 dI30
ments of exponential ½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03   ekt . We consider no delay effect on dIdt1 ; dIdt3 ; dt ; dt
and get the following equations:

k  i1  ekt ¼ i01  ekðtD1 Þ ; k  i3  ekt ¼ i03  ekðtD3 Þ


k  i01  ekt ¼ C1  i1  ekðts1 Þ þ C2  i3  ekðts3 Þ þ C3  i01  ekðtD1 Þ þ C4  i03  ekðtD3 Þ
k  i03  ekt ¼ C6  i1  ekðts1 Þ þ C7  i3  ekðts3 Þ þ C8  i01  ekðtD1 Þ þ C9  i03  ekðtD3 Þ
 k  i1 þ i01  ekD1 ¼ 0;  k  i3 þ i03  ekD3 ¼ 0
C1  i1  eks1 þ C2  i3  eks3 þ ðC3  ekD1  kÞ  i01 þ C4  i03  ekD3 ¼ 0
C6  i1  eks1 þ C7  i3  eks3 þ C8  i01  ekD1 þ ðC9  ekD3  kÞ  i03 ¼ 0

ðj¼0Þ ðj¼0Þ 0 ðj¼0Þ 0 ðj¼0Þ


In the equilibrium fixed point I1 ¼ 0; I3 ¼ 0; I1 ¼ 0; I3 ¼ 0:
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 181

The small increments Jacobian of our active circulator system is as bellow:


0
1
0 1i1
N11 . . . N14 B C
B .. .. .. C B i3 C
@ . . . AB C ¼ 0; N11 ¼ k; N12 ¼ 0; N13 ¼ ekD1 ; N14
@ i01 A
N41    N44
i03
¼ 0; N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ k; N23 ¼ 0; N24 ¼ ekD3

N31 ¼ C1  eks1 ; N32 ¼ C2  eks3 ; N33 ¼ C3  ekD1  k; N34 ¼ C4  ekD3 ;


N41 ¼ C6  eks1 ; N42 ¼ C7  eks3
N43 ¼ C8  ekD1 ; N44 ¼ C9  ekD3  k
0 1
N11 . . . N14
B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A; detjA  k  I j ¼ 0
N41    N44

Dðs1 ; s3 ; D1 ; D3 Þ ¼ k4  k3  ðC3  ekD1 þ C9  ekD3 Þ þ k2  fðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ


 ekðD1 þ D3 Þ  C7  ekðD3 þ s3 Þ  C1  ekðs1 þ D1 Þ g
þ k  fðC1  C9  C6  C4 Þ  ekðs1 þ D1 þ D3 Þ  ðC2  C8  C7  C3 Þ  ekðs3 þ D1 þ D3 Þ g
þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ  ekðs1 þ s3 þ D1 þ D3 Þ

We have three stability cases: s1 ¼ s3 ¼ s & D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼ s3 ¼


0 & D1 ¼ D3 ¼ D or s1 ¼ s3 ¼ D1 ¼ D3 ¼ sD otherwise s1 6¼ s3 & D1 6¼ D3 and
they are positive parameters. There are other possible simple stability cases: s1 ¼
s; s3 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼ 0; s3 ¼ s ; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0 ; s1 ¼ s3 ¼ 0 ; D1 ¼
D ; D3 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼ s3 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ 0 ; D3 ¼ D. We need to get characteristics
equations for all above stability analysis cases. We study the occurrence of any
possible stability switching, resulting from the increase of the value of the time
delays s; D; sD for the general characteristic equation Dðk; s=D=sD Þ. If we choose s
parameter, then Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks . The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is
P
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ nk¼0 Pk ðsÞ  kk ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k2 þ P3 ðsÞ  k3 þ . . .
P
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ m k¼0 qk ðsÞ  k ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ
k

k þ q2 ðsÞ  k þ . . ..
2

The case we analyze is when there is a delay in I1 and I3 currents only. The delay
is the same for I1 and I3 and equal to s (s1 ¼ s; s3 ¼ s) which describe most of
active circulator parasitic effects. The general characteristic equation D(k, s) is as
follow: Dðs1 ¼ s3 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0; kÞ
182 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Dðs1 ¼ s3 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼ Dðs; kÞ
¼ k4  k3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ þ k2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ þ fk2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ
þ k  ðC1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3 Þ
þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ  eks g  eks

Under Taylor series approximation: eks  1  k  s the Maclaurin series is a


Taylor series expansion of a eks function about zero (0). We get the following
general characteristic equation D(k, s) under Taylor series approximation:
eks  1  k  s.

Dðs1 ¼ s3 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼ Dðs; kÞ ¼ k4  k3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ


þ k2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ þ fk2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ
þ k  ½C1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3  s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ
þ C1  C7  C6  C2 g  eks
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 2; n [ m:
Pn
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k¼0 Pk ðsÞ  kk

X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  kk ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k2 þ P3 ðsÞ  k3 þ P4 ðsÞ  k4
k¼0

¼ k2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ  k3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ þ k4
P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P2 ðsÞ ¼ C3  C9  C8  C4 ; P3 ðsÞ ¼ ðC3 þ C9 Þ;
P4 ðsÞ ¼ 1

Pm
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ k¼0 qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k
þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 :

X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ k2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ
k¼0
þ k  ½C1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3  s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ
þ C1  C7  C6  C2
q0 ðsÞ ¼ C1  C7  C6  C2 ;
q1 ðsÞ ¼ C1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3  s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ;
q2 ðsÞ ¼ ðC7 þ C1 Þ
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 183

The homogeneous system for I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 leads to a characteristic equation for the
P
eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ 4j¼0 aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼
P2
j¼0 cj  k and the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on qi ; qk and
j

delay s. qi ; qk are any active circulator’s parameters, other parameters keep as a


constant. a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ C3  C9  C8  C4 ; a3 ¼ ðC3 þ C9 Þ ; a4 ¼ 1 ;
c0 ¼ C1  C7  C6  C2 ; c2 ¼ ðC7 þ C1 Þ c1 ¼ C1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7 
C3  s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ.
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e. k = 0 is not a of PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0.
Furthermore, P(k), Q(k) are analytic functions of k, for which the following
requirements of the analysis [BK] can also be verified in the present case.
If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R, then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0. jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for
jkj ! 1, Re k
0. No roots bifurcation from ∞. FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2
has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x. Each positive root
xðqi ; qk Þ of F(x) = 0 is continuous and differentiable respect to qi ; qk . We assume
that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That is for any real
number x.

pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0 ;
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ  i  x3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ i  x  ½C1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3
 s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ þ C1  C7  C6  C2
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x4 þ x2  fC7 þ C1  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 g
þ C1  C7  C6  C2 þ i  x  fC1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8
þ C7  C3  s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ  x2  ðC3 þ C9 Þg 6¼ 0
jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  fðC3 þ C9 Þ2  2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þg
þ x4  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ4

For simplicity we define a function: XðCj ; s ; 1 j 9Þ


184 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

X ¼ XðCj ; s ; 1 j 9Þ ¼ C1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3
 s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ
þ i  x  XðCj ; s ; 1 j 9Þ
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ C1  C7  C6  C2 þ i  x  X
jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x4  ðC7 þ C1 Þ2 þ x2  fX2 þ 2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg
þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ2

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  fðC3 þ C9 Þ2


 2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þg þ x4  fðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ4  ðC7 þ C1 Þ2 g
 x2  fX2 þ 2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ2

We define the following parameters for simplicity:

U0 ¼ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ2 ; U2 ¼ fX2 þ 2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg


U4 ¼ ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ4  ðC7 þ C1 Þ2 ;
U6 ¼ ðC3 þ C9 Þ2  2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ ; U8 ¼ 1

P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 U2k  x
2k
¼ 0 and its roots are given
by solving the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2 
ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ

PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ðx2  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 Þ ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ


QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ ;
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  X ðCj ; s ; 1 j 9Þ ¼ x  X

Hence

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2

x3  ½ðx2  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 Þ  X þ ðC3 þ C9 Þ  fx2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg


sin hðsÞ ¼
x4  ðC7 þ C1 Þ2 þ x2  fX2 þ 2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ2
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 185

x2  ðx2  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 Þ  fx2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg  x4  ðC3 þ C9 Þ  X


cos hðsÞ ¼ 
x4  ðC7 þ C1 Þ2 þ x2  fX2 þ 2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ2

P
Which jointly with Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 ) 4k¼0 U2k  x2k ¼ 0 that is a continuous and
differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use Theorem 1.2. This proves the
Theorem 1.3.
Our active circulator homogeneous system for i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 leads to a characteristic
equation for the eigenvalue k having the form P ðkÞ þ Q ðkÞ  eks = 0; First case
s1 ¼ s ; s3 ¼ s ; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0. The general characteristic equation D(k, s) is as
follow: Dðs1 ¼ s3 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼ Dðs; kÞ

Dðs1 ¼ s3 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼ Dðs; kÞ ¼ k4  k3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ


þ k2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ þ fk2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ
þ k  ðC1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3 Þ þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ  eks g  eks

Under Taylor series approximation: eks  1  k  s. The Maclaurin series is a


Taylor series expansion of a eks function about zero (0). We get the following
general characteristic equation D(k, s) under Taylor series approximation:
eks  1  k  s.

Dðs1 ¼ s3 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼ Dðs; kÞ ¼ k4  k3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ


þ k2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ þ fk2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ k  ½C1  C9  C6  C4
 C2  C8 þ C7  C3  s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ þ C1  C7  C6  C2 g  eks

We use different parameters terminology from our last characteristics parameters


definition: k ! j ; pk ðsÞ ! aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 4 ; m ¼ 2 ; n [ m.
P
Additionally Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! QðkÞ then PðkÞ ¼ 4j¼0 aj  k j ;
P
QðkÞ ¼ 2j¼0 cj  k j

Pk ¼ k2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ  k3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ þ k4
Qk ¼ k2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ k  ½C1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3
 s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ þ C1  C7  C6  C2

n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m and aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable func-


tion of s such that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0. In the following “−” denotes complex and conju-
gate. PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s. The coefficients
faj ðRf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . .Þ and cj ðRf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . .Þg 2 R depend on
active circulator system’s Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . . values.
186 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ C3  C9  C8  C4 ; a3 ¼ (C3 þ C9 ); a4 ¼ 1
c0 ¼ C1  C7  C6  C2 ; c1 ¼ ½C1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3
 s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ; c2 ¼ ðC7 þ C1 Þ

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments


ðRf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . .Þ will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The
coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their arguments, and
direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; C1  C7  C6  C2 6¼ 0

ðLRLC
1
 CR Þ  L1R  ½L1  C2  CR  1
 ½C11 þ L1  C1   ðC11  L1LCR R Þ
1
 LR 6¼ 0
fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg

ðLRLC
1
 CR Þ  L1R  ½L1  C2  CR   L1R  ½C11 þ L1  C1   ðC11  L1LCR R Þ
1
6¼ 0
fLf þ L1  ð1  LLR1 Þg

8 Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . . 2 R þ i.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root of the characteristic


equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic function of k for which the following
requirements of the analysis (see Kuang [5], Sect. 3.4) can also be verified in the
present case [6, 7].
(a) If k ¼ i  x, x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0, i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
ðRf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . .Þ domain of interest.
(b) jQ(kÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Re k
0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
Indeed, in the limit

fk2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ k  ½C1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3


Q(kÞ s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ þ C1  C7  C6  C2 g
j j¼j j
PðkÞ k  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ  k3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ þ k4
2

(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  fðC3 þ C9 Þ2


 2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þg þ x4  fðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ4
 ðC7 þ C1 Þ2 g  x2  fX2 þ 2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg
 ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ2

Has at most a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x (degree


in x8 ).
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 187

(d) Each positive root xðRf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . .Þ of F(xÞ¼ 0 is continuous and


differentiable with Respect to Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . .. This condition can only
be assessed numerically.
In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have
Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ thus, k ¼ i  x, x [ 0 maybe on
eigenvalue of characteristic equation. The analysis consists in identifying the roots
of the characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k—
plane, whereby increasing the parameters Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . ., Rek may, at
the crossing, change its sign from (−) to (+), i.e. from a stable focus
ð0Þ ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ
E ð0Þ ðI1 ; I3 ; I1 ; I3 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0Þ to an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature
may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with respect
Re kÞ
to Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . . and gate antenna parameters. ^1 ðRf Þ ¼ ð@ @Rf k¼ix ;
Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . . ¼ const

@ Re k
^1 ðLf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Lf k¼ix
@Re k
^1 ðCf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Lf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Cf k¼ix
@ Re k
^1 ðCc Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Rsb ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Cc k¼ix
@ Re k
^1 ðRsb Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Rsb k¼ix
@ Re k
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; . . . ¼ const ; x 2 R þ :
@s k¼ix

In the case s1 ¼ s3 ¼ s & D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0 we get the following results: for sim-


plicity we define a function: XðCj ; s; 1 j 9Þ

X ¼ XðCj ; s; 1 j 9Þ ¼ C1  C9  C6  C4  C2  C8 þ C7  C3
 s  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ
PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ðx2  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 Þ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ; QI ði  x; sÞ
¼ x  X ðCj ; s; 1 j 9Þ ¼ x  X
U0 ¼ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ2 ; U2 ¼ fX2 þ 2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ  ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg
U4 ¼ ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ4  ðC7 þ C1 Þ2 ; U6 ¼ ðC3 þ C9 Þ2
 2  ðC3  C9  C8  C4 Þ ; U8 ¼ 1
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2
X
4
¼ U0 þ U2  x2 þ U4  x4 þ U6  x6 þ U8  x8 ¼ U2k  x2k
k¼0
188 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 U2k  x
2k
¼ 0. When writing PðkÞ ¼
PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼ i  x into active
circulator system’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:
PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin x  s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2

PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos x  s ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above sin x  s and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and
adding the sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note that FðxÞ is dependent of s. Now it is important to notice that if s 62 I (assume
that I R þ 0 is the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for s 62 I , xðsÞ is
not defined. Then for all s in I xðsÞ is satisfied that Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0). Then there are no
positive xðsÞ solutions for Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have stability switches. For
any s 2 I where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, we can define the angle
hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . .

PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for xðsÞ  s must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ
þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R ;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that is a continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; . . . indicate the corresponding
partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on ^ðxÞ, remember in kðRf ; Lf ; Cf ;
Cc ; Rsb ; . . .Þ and xðRf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; . . .Þ, and keeping all parameters except one
(x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiating
active circulator characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks = 0 with respect to
specific parameter (x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates.
Remark: x ¼ Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; . . .; etc:;

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ

where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i  x, and bearing i Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ,
Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ; i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ and
that on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 189

@k 1 i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þ jk¼ix ¼ ð Þ
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ;


Q ¼ QR þ i  QI ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ;
Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx
P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I . When (x) can be any active circulator parameters R1, C1, And
time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments ði; x; xÞ,
and where Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ.
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ; xx ¼ Fx =Fx :
We define U and V:

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = s

PR ¼ x2  ðx2  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 Þ ; PI ¼ x3  ðC3 þ C9 Þ ;


QR ¼ x2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þ
QI ¼ x  X ðCj ; s; 1 j 9Þ ¼ x  X ðsÞ ; PRx ¼ 2  x  ½2  x2  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 
PIx ¼ 3  x2  ðC3 þ C9 Þ ; QRx ¼ 2  x  ðC7 þ C1 Þ ; QIx ¼ X ; PRs ¼ 0 ;
PIs ¼ 0 ; QRs ¼ 0; xs ¼ Fs =Fx
@X
QIs ¼ x  ¼ x  ðC6  C2  C1  C7 Þ
@s
PRx  PR ¼ 2  x3  ð2  x2  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 Þ  ðx2  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 Þ ;
PIx  PI ¼ 3  x5  ðC3 þ C9 Þ2
QRx  QR ¼ 2  x  ðC7 þ C1 Þ  fx2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg ;
QIx  QI ¼ x  X2 ðsÞ
Fs ¼ 2  ½ðPRs  PR þ PIs  PI Þ  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þ ;
Fs ¼ 2  QIs  QI ¼ 2  x2  ðC6  C2  C1  C7 Þ  XðsÞ
PR  PIx ¼ 3  x4  ðx2  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 Þ  ðC3 þ C9 Þ ;
PI  PRx ¼ 2  x4  ðC3 þ C9 Þ  ½2  x2  C3  C9 þ C8  C4 
QR  QIx ¼ fx2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg  XðsÞ ;
QI  QRx ¼ 2  x2  XðsÞ  ðC7 þ C1 Þ
V ¼ ðPR  PIs  PI  PRs Þ  ðQR  QIs  QI  QRs Þ
V ¼ QR  QIs ¼ fx2  ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1  C7  C6  C2 Þg
 x  ðC6  C2  C1  C7 Þ ; Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0:
190 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Differentiating with respect to s and we get Fx  @x @x


@s þ Fs ¼ 0 ; s 2 I ) @s ¼
 FFxs

@Re k @x Fs
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; ¼ xs ¼  ;
@s k¼ix @s Fx
2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g
Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@s k¼ix
@x U  @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  signfs  þxþ g
@s jPj2

We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcations)


ð0Þ ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ
active circulator system, about the equilibrium point Eð0Þ ðI0 ; I3 ; I0 ; I3 Þ ¼
ð0; 0; 0; 0Þ as a result of a variation of delay parameter s. The analysis consists in
identifying the roots of our system characteristic equation situated on the imaginary
axis of the complex k-plane where by increasing the delay parameter s, Re k may at
the crossing, changes its sign from − to +, i.e. from a stable focus E(*) to an unstable
one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of
the partial derivatives with respect to s,

@ Re k
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; . . . ¼ const ; x 2 R þ :
@s k¼ix

For our stability switching analysis, we choose typical active circulator param-
eter values: Rf = 110 Ohm, Lf = 1.4 nH, Cf = 5 pF, Cc = 10 pF, Rsb = 115 Ohm,
MESFET (F20-FET-4x75), L1 = 5 nH, C1 = 5 pF, La = 1.6 nH, Ra = 500 Ohm,
Lt = 7 nH, LR = 15 nH. LR ¼ Lf þ La þ Lt þ L1 ¼ 1:4 nH þ 1:6 nH þ 7 nH þ
5 nH ¼ 15 nH:

1 1 1 1 1 1
CR ¼ þ þ ¼ þ þ ¼ 5 1011 ;
Cf Cc C1 5 1012 10 1012 5 1012
L1
C0 ¼ 2:11 108 ; C1 ¼ C0  ð  CR Þ ¼ 9:14 1019
LR  C1
1 L1  CR
C2 ¼ C0  ð  Þ ¼ 0:703 1019 ; C3 ¼ C0  Rf ¼  232:1 108 ;
C1 LR
L1  C0
C4 ¼ C0  L1  ðRf þ Ra Þ ¼ 643:55; C5 ¼ ¼ 0:7 108
LR
1 1 1
C6 ¼  ½ þ L1  C1  ¼ 0:171 1020 ; C7 ¼  ½L1  C2  CR  ¼ 3 1019 ;
LR C1 LR
L1 C3 1
C8 ¼ ¼ 77:36 108 ; C9 ¼  ½L1  C4  ðRf þ Ra Þ ’ 40:6 109
LR LR
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 191

Then we get the expression for Fðx; sÞ for an active circulator parameter’s
value. We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,
complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001::10. And we
can be express by 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We plot the stability switch diagram
based on different delay values of our active circulator system.

@ Re k 2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@s Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 

@ Re k 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2

The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally When all active circulator’s parameters
are known and the stability switch due to various time delay values s is described in
the following expression:

signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx ðxðsÞ; sÞg


UðxðsÞÞ  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ VðxðsÞÞ
 signfs  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ xðsÞ þ g
jPðxðsÞÞj2

Remark: We know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies its roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values, which xi are complex or imag-
inary numbered, then unable to analyze stability [6, 7].
We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,
complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001::10 and we
can be express by 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We define new MATLAB script
parameters: s!Tau, Ci!Gi (i=0..9), X!Omega, Uj!Phij. Running MATLAB
script for s values (s 2 ½0:001::10) gives the following results.
MATLAB script: Tau=0.1;G0=2.11e8;G1=-9.14e19; G2=0.703e19;
G3=-232.1e8;G4=-643.55;G5=0.7e8;G6=-0.171e20;G7=-3e19;G8=-77.36e8;G9=-
40.6e9; Omega=G1*G9-G6*G4-G2*G8+G7*G3-Tau*(G1*G7-G6*G2);Phi0=-
(G1*G7-G6*G2)^2; Phi2=-(Omega^2+2*(G7+G1)*(G1*G7 G6*G2)); Phi4=
(G3*G9-G8*G4)^4-(G7+G1)^2; Phi6=(G3+G9)^2-2*(G3*G9-G8*G4);Phi8=1; p=
[Phi8 0 Phi6 0 Phi4 0 Phi2 0 Phi0];r=roots(p).
Results: (Table 2.2).
We plot 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. s:0!10; x:0!1e20. We define additional
MATLAB script parameters x!w, s!t (Fig. 2.8).
We get two possible real values for x which fulfil Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 ; Fðx ¼ 0 or x ¼
1:0e þ 020; sÞ ¼ 0 s 2 ½0:001::10. Next is to find those x, s values which fulfil
sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .
192 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Table 2.2 Active circulator s s = 1; s = 10 s = [0…0.1]


roots xi ðsÞ
x1 1.0e+020 1.0e+020
x2 −6.6468 + 6.6468i −6.6468 + 6.6468i
x3 −6.6468 − 6.6468i −6.6468 − 6.6468i
x4 6.6468 + 6.6468i 6.6468 + 6.6468i
x5 6.6468 − 6.6468i 6.6468 − 6.6468i
x6 −0.0000 0
x7 0.0000 0
x8 0.0000 + 0.0000i 0
x9 0.0000 − 0.0000i 0

Fig. 2.8 Active circulator F


(x, s) function

PR  QI þ PI  QR
sinðx  sÞ ¼ and cos hðsÞ ¼ . . .
jQj2
ðPR  QR þ PI  QI Þ
cosðx  sÞ ¼  ; jQj2 ¼ Q2R þ Q2I
jQj2

Case I: x ¼ 0 then PR ¼ 0 ; PI ¼ 0 ; QR ¼ C1  C7  C6  C2 ; QI ¼ 0; sinðx  sÞ


¼ . . . fulfil and cosðx  sÞ ¼ . . . Can’t fulfil since cosðx  sÞjx¼0 6¼ 0.

Case II: x = 1.0e+020 which can fulfil expressions sinðx  sÞ ¼ . . . and


cosðx  sÞ ¼ . . .. Finally, we plot the stability switch diagram based on different
delay values of our Active circulator system (x = 1.0e20). PR = x2
(x2−9.4233e20), PI = x36.381e10, QR = −x21.214e20+2.8622e39, QI = x 
Omega. QIs ¼ x  2:86e39 ; V ¼ QR  QIs ; V ¼ QR  QIs ¼ x3  3:473e59
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 193

PIx ¼ x2  19:143e10 ; QIx ¼ Omega ; PRx ¼ 2  x  ½2  x2  9:4233e20 ;


QRx ¼ x  2:428e20
PRx  PR ¼ 2  x3  ð2  x2  9:423e20Þ  ðx2  9:423e20Þ ;
U ¼ x4  ðx2  6:377e10 þ 6:0119e31Þ  x2  Omega  1:214e20
PIx  PI ¼ x5  122:15e20 ; QRx  QR ¼ x3  2:947e40 ;
QIx  QI ¼ x  ½Omega2 ; Fs ¼ 2  QIs  QI ¼ 2  QIs  QI

Fs ¼ 2  QIs  QI ¼ 5:72e39  x2  Omega: We plot the function:


gðsÞ ¼ ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k
@s Þk¼ix

@ Re k 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
gðsÞ ¼ ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2

@ Re k
sign ½gðsÞ ¼ sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ sign½ð Þ 
@s k¼ix
2  fFx  ðV þ x  P Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
2
¼ sign½ 
Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2

Since Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2 [ 0 then sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signfFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ


Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg

Fs
sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx   ½ðV þ x  P2 Þ   ðU þ s  P2 Þg ;
Fx
Fs @x @F=@x
xs ¼  ; xs ¼ ð Þ1 ¼ 
Fx @s @F=@s
sign ½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx   ½V þ xs  U þ x  P2 þ xs  s  P2 g ;
1 V þ xs  U
sign ½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx   ½ 2   ½ þ x þ xs  sg
P P2
1 V þ xs  U
sign ½ 2  [ 0 ) sign ½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx   ½ þ x þ xs  sg
P P2
V þ xs  U
sign ½^1 ðsÞ ¼ sign½Fx   sign ½ þ x þ xs  s;
P2
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ

We check the sign of ^1 ðsÞ according the following rule (Table 2.3).

Table 2.3 Active circulator sign ½Fx  sign½V þPx2 s U þ x þ xs  s sign ½^1 ðsÞ
stability switching criteria
± ± +
± –
194 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

If sign[K−1(s)] > 0 then the crossing proceeds from (−) to (+) respectively
(stable to unstable). If sign[K−1(s)] < 0 then the crossing proceeds from (+) to (−)
respectively (unstable to stable). Anyway the stability switching can occur only for
x = 1.0e + 020 and s 2 ½0:001::10. Since it is a very complex function, we rec-
ommend to solve it numerically rather than analytic. We plot the stability switch
diagram based on different delay values of our active circulator system.
We consider Active circulator which connects in a configuration of Reflection
Type Phase Shifter (RTPS) circuit. Due to the parasitic effect, there is a delay in
time for current which flow in and out Active circulator ports. This delay causes to
stability switching for our Active circulator system. We draw our Active circulator
(RTPS) equivalent circuit and get system differential equations. Our variables are
first and third ports currents and currents derivative. Our system dynamic behavior
is dependent on circuit overall parameters and parasitic delay in time. We keep all
circuit parameters fix and change, parasitic delay over various values
s 2 ½0:001::10. Our analysis results extend that of in the way that it deals with
stability switching for different delay values. This implies that our system behavior
of the circuit cannot inspect by short analysis and we must study the full system.
Several very important issues and possibilities were left out of the present analysis.
One possibility is the stability switching by circuit parameters. Every circuit’s
parameter variation can change our system dynamic and stability behavior. This
case can be solved by the same methods combined with alternative and more
technical hypotheses. Moreover, numerical simulations for the active circulator
model studied in references suggest that this result can be extended to enhance
models with more general functions. Still another extension of our results would be
to treat the case of delayed Active circulator’s port currents derivative in time
dI1 ðtD1 Þ dI3 ðtD3 Þ
dt ; dt ; D1 [ 0 ; D3 [ 0 [5, 6]. It would be extremely desirable to con-
firm these cases by mathematical proofs. Active circulator transmission lines are
characterized by parasitic effects which can influence active circulator system sta-
bility in time. There are four main active circulator variables which are affected by
transmission lines parasitic effects, first and third branch currents and currents
derivatives respectively. Each active circulator currents variable under transmission
line parasitic effects is characterized by time delay respectively. The two time
delays are not the same, but can be categorized to some sub cases due to inter-
ferences behavior. The first case we analyze is when there is delay in active cir-
culator first and third branches current and no delay in active circulator first and
third branches current derivative. The second case we analyze is when there is delay
in active circulator first and third branches current derivative and no delay in active
circulator first and third branches current [6, 7]. The third case we analyze is when
there is delay in active circulator first and third branches current and also delay in
active circulator first and third branches current derivative.
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 195

(s1 ¼ s3 ¼ D1 ¼ D3 ¼ sD ) [6, 7]. For simplicity of our analysis we consider in the


third case all delays are the same (there is a difference but it is neglected in our
analysis). In each case we derive the related characteristic equation. The charac-
teristic equation is dependent on active circulator overall parameters and interfer-
ences time delay. Upon mathematics manipulation and [BK] theorems and
definitions we derive the expression which gives us a clear picture on active cir-
culator stability map. The stability map gives all possible options for stability
segments, each segment belongs to different time delay value segment. Active
circulator’s stability analysis can be influenced either by system overall parameter
values. We left this analysis and do not discuss it in the current chapter [12].
Lemma 1.1 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive and real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0.
Defined for s 2 I, which is continuous and differentiable. Assume further that if
k ¼ i  x, x 2 R, then Pn ði  x; sÞ þ Qn ði  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R hold true. Then the
functions Sn ðsÞ; n 2 N0 , are continuous and differentiable on I.
Theorem 1.2 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 defined for
s 2 I; I R þ 0 , and at some s 2 I, Sn ðs Þ ¼ 0. For some n 2 N0 then a pair of
simple conjugate pure imaginary roots k þ ðs Þ ¼ i  xðs Þ; k ðs Þ ¼ i  xðs Þ of
Dðk; sÞ ¼ 0 exist at s ¼ s which crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if
dðs Þ [ 0 and cross the imaginary axis from right to left if dðs Þ\0 where

d Re k dSn ðsÞ
dðs Þ ¼ signf j  
 g ¼ signfFx ðxðs Þ; s Þg  signf j g
ds k¼ixðs Þ ds s¼s

Theorem 1.3 The characteristic equation has a pair of simple and conjugate pure
imaginary roots k ¼ xðs Þ; xðs Þ real at s 2 I if Sn ðs Þ ¼ s  sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for
some n 2 N0 . If xðs Þ ¼ x þ ðs Þ, this pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary
roots crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if d þ ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the
imaginary axis from right to left if d þ ðs Þ\ 0 where d þ ðs Þ ¼ sign
dSn ðsÞ
fd Re k  
ds jk¼ix þ ðs Þ g ¼ signf ds js¼s g. If xðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ, this pair of simple con-
jugate pure imaginary roots crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if
d ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from right to left If d ðs Þ\0 where
dSn ðsÞ
d ðs Þ ¼ signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix ðs Þ g ¼ signf ds js¼s g.
If x ðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ then Dðs Þ ¼ 0 and signfdRek j
þ  ds  g ¼ 0, the same is
k¼ixðs Þ
true when S0n ðs Þ ¼ 0. The following result can be useful in identifying values of s
Where stability switches happened.
196 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled


Plasma Sources Copper Legs Delayed in Time System
Stability Analysis

In this subchapter, Very Critical and useful subject is discussed: cylindrical (closed)
RF network antennas for coupled plasma sources copper legs delayed in time. The
resonant RF networks can be arranged to form large-area or large-volume plasma
sources with properties similar to Inductive Coupled Plasma (ICP) devices. There
are medical applications of Birdcage coils and closed and open configurations of the
antenna for plasma production are possible and can be analyzed by using mathe-
matical formulation. There are systems of an open network antenna as a large-area
planar plasma source and of a closed network antenna as a cylindrical plasma
source. Both are composed of similar electrical meshes. Operation at different
normal modes shows the capability of this antenna type of large-volume plasma
applications [86].
An important issue of proper antenna operation is the location of the RF feeding
and grounding connections on the antenna. There are a large number of different RF
antenna arrangements possible in view of the geometry and RF operation and of
plasma obtained. In our analysis, we investigated only cylindrical RF antenna
which built following a high-pass Birdcage coil. The antenna is mounted outside a
glass tube. The RF antenna consists of 16 copper legs (Fig. 2.9), equally spaced
interconnected with capacitors, each copper leg current has parasitic time delayed
(s1–1 … s1–16). We consider for simplicity that all copper legs parasitic time delayed
are equal (s1–1 = s1–2 =  = s1–16) and the voltages on delay units (Ve ) are
neglected Ve ! e. There is a delay in each Copper leg current
I1 ðt  s11 Þ; . . .; I16 ðt  s116 Þ. We consider all interconnected capacitor values are
the same (C) and all antenna elements inductance values are the same (L). CA1 ¼
CA2 ¼    ¼ CA16 ¼ C ; CB1 ¼ CB2 ¼    ¼ CB16 ¼ CL1 ¼ L2 ¼    ¼ L16 ¼ L ;

Fig. 2.9 Schematic of the


16-leg cylindrical (Birdcage)
RF network antenna (closed) Copper
legs
delays τk
(k=1..16)

τk
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 197

Fig. 2.10 Upper view of


16-leg cylindrical RF antenna

IL1 ¼ I1 ; IL2 ¼ I2 ; . . .; IL16 ¼ I16 : We choose first case: antenna network is fed by
the transmitter unit (S1 = OFF, no direct RF feeding). The upper view of 16-leg
cylindrical RF antenna network described in Fig. 2.10.
The lower view of 16-leg cylindrical RF antenna network described in Fig. 2.11.
Cylindrical RF network antenna system can represent as round strip of capacitors
and inductors (Figs. 2.12 and 2.13). The schematic contains RF feeding signal, S1
switch (S1 = ON for direct RF signal feeding, S1 = OFF for RF signal transmitter
feeding). The upper network connecting nodes are A1, A2,…,A16 and the lower
network connecting nodes are B1, B2,…,B16. Antenna copper leg current parasitic
delays are represented by delay units Tau1–1…Tau1–16 (s11 ; . . .; s116 ). Rp is the
parasitic resistance of RF feeding point (A1). The upper system spaced capacitors
are CA1,…,CA16 and the lower system spaced capacitors are CB1,…,CB16.

Fig. 2.11 Lower view of


16-leg cylindrical RF antenna
198 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Fig. 2.12 16-leg cylindrical RF antenna strip (feeding side)

Fig. 2.13 16-leg cylindrical RF antenna strip (ground side)

d d
ICA1 ¼ CA1  ðVA1  VA2 Þ; ICA2 ¼ CA2  ðVA2  VA3 Þ ;
dt dt
d d
ICA3 ¼ CA3  ðVA3  VA4 Þ; . . .; ICA7 ¼ CA7  ðVA7  VA8 Þ
dt dt
dVA8 d
ICA8 ¼ CA8  ; ICAk ¼ CAk  ðVAk  VAðk þ 1Þ Þ ; k ¼ 1; . . .; 7 ;
dt dt
d d
ICA16 ¼ CA16  ðVA1  VA16 Þ; ICA15 ¼ CA15  ðVA16  VA15 Þ
dt dt
d d
ICA14 ¼ CA14  ðVA15  VA14 Þ; . . .; ICA10 ¼ CA10  ðVA11  VA10 Þ ;
dt dt
dVA10 d
ICA9 ¼ CA9  ; ICAl ¼ CAl  ðVAðl þ 1Þ  VAl Þ ; l ¼ 10; . . .; 15
dt dt
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 199

d d
ICB1 ¼ CB1  ðVB1  VB2 Þ; ICB2 ¼ CB2  ðVB2  VB3 Þ ; k ¼ 1; . . .; 8 ; ; . . .;
dt dt
d d
ICB8 ¼ CB8  ðVB2  VB3 Þ ; ICBk ¼ CBk  ðVBk  VBðk þ 1Þ Þ
dt dt
d d
ICB16 ¼ CB16  ðVB1  VB16 Þ; ICB15 ¼ CB15  ðVB16  VB15 Þ ; ; . . .;
dt dt
d
ICB9 ¼ CB9  ðVB10  VB9 Þ
dt
d
ICBl ¼ CBl  ðVBðl þ 1Þ  VBl Þ ; l ¼ 15; . . .; 9
dt
dIL1 dIL2 dIL3
VA1  VB1 ¼ L1  ; VA2  VB2 ¼ L2  ; VA3  VB3 ¼ L3  ; ; . . .;
dt dt dt
dIL8 dIL9
VA8  VB8 ¼ L8  ; VB9 ¼ L9 
dt dt
dIL10 dIL16
VA10  VB10 ¼ L10  ; . . .; VA16  VB16 ¼ L16  ;
dt dt
dILm
VAm  VBm ¼ Lm  ; m ¼ 1; . . .; 16 ; m 6¼ 9
dt
dIL9
VB9 ¼ L9  ; VA9 ¼ 0 ; A9  ground
dt

IRP ¼ ICA16 þ ICA1 þ IL1 ; ICA1 ¼ ICA2 þ IL2 ;


ICA2 ¼ ICA3 þ IL3 ; . . .; ICA7 ¼ ICA8 þ IL8
ICAl ¼ ICAðl þ 1Þ þ ILðl þ 1Þ ; l ¼ 1; . . .; 7
ICA16 ¼ ICA15 þ IL16 ; ICA15 ¼ ICA14 þ IL15 ;
ICA14 ¼ ICA13 þ IL14 ; . . .; ICA10 ¼ ICA9 þ IL10
ICAk ¼ ICAðk1Þ þ ILk ; k ¼ 16; . . .; 10
IL1 ¼ ICB1 þ ICB16 ; ICB2 ¼ ICB1 þ IL2 ; ICB3 ¼ ICB2 þ IL3 ; ICB4 ¼ ICB3 þ IL4 ; . . .;
ICB8 ¼ ICB7 þ IL8 ; IL9 ¼ ICB8 þ ICB9 ; ICBm ¼ ICBðm1Þ þ ILm ; m ¼ 2; . . .; 8
ICB15 ¼ ICB16 þ IL16 ; ICB14 ¼ ICB15 þ IL15 ; ICB13 ¼ ICB14 þ IL14 ;
ICB12 ¼ ICB13 þ IL13 ; . . .; ICB9 ¼ ICB10 þ IL10
ICBn ¼ ICBðn þ 1Þ þ ILðn þ 1Þ ; n ¼ 15; . . .; 9:

Upon mathematic manipulation we get the following expressions:


200 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

ICA1 ICB1 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL2


 ¼ L1  2  L2  2 ; CA1 ¼ CB1 ¼ C ; L1 ¼ L2 ¼ L ;
CA1 CB1 dt dt
1 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL2
 ðICA1  ICB1 Þ ¼  2
LC dt2 dt
2
ICA2 ICB2 d IL2 d 2 IL3
 ¼ L2  2  L3  2 ; CA2 ¼ CB2 ¼ C ; L2 ¼ L3 ¼ L ;
CA2 CB2 dt dt
1 d 2 IL2 d 2 IL3
 ðICA2  ICB2 Þ ¼  2 . . .;
LC dt2 dt
ICA7 ICB7 d 2 IL7 d 2 IL8
 ¼ L7  2  L8  2 ; L7 ¼ L8 ¼ L ;
CA7 CB7 dt dt
2 2
1 d IL7 d IL8
 ðICA7  ICB7 Þ ¼  2
LC dt2 dt
CA7 ¼ CB7 ¼ C ; L1 ¼ L2 ¼    ¼ L16 ¼ L ; k ¼ 1; . . .; 7 ;
1 d 2 ILk d 2 ILðk þ 1Þ
 ðICAk  ICBk Þ ¼ 2  ; k ¼ 1; . . .; 7
LC dt dt2

1 d 2 IL11 d 2 IL10 1
 ðICA10  ICB10 Þ ¼  ; CA10 ¼ CB10 ¼ C ;  ðICA15  ICB15 Þ
LC dt2 dt2 LC
d 2 IL16 d 2 IL15
¼  ; CA15 ¼ CB15 ¼ C
dt2 dt2

1 d 2 ILðm þ 1Þ d 2 ILm
 ðICAm  ICBm Þ ¼  ; m ¼ 10; . . .; 15 ; CA8 ¼ CB8 ¼ C ;
LC dt2 dt2
1 d 2 IL8 d 2 IL9
VA9 ¼ 0 ;  ðICA8  ICB8 Þ ¼ þ
LC dt2 dt2

1 d 2 IL9 d 2 IL10
CA9 ¼ CB9 ¼ C ; VA9 ¼ 0 ;  ðICA9  ICB9 Þ ¼ þ ;
LC dt2 dt2
1 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL16
CA16 ¼ CB16 ¼ C; VA9 ¼ 0 ;  ðICA16  ICB16 Þ ¼ 
LC dt2 dt2
IR P ¼ ICA16 þ ICA1 þ IL1 ; ICA1 ¼ ICA2 þ IL2 ; ICA2 ¼ ICA3 þ IL3 ;
ICA3 ¼ ICA4 þ IL4 ; ICA4 ¼ ICA5 þ IL5 ; ICA5 ¼ ICA6 þ IL6

ICA6 ¼ ICA7 þ IL7 ; ICA7 ¼ ICA8 þ IL8 ; ICA10 ¼ ICA9 þ IL10 ; ICA11 ¼ ICA10 þ IL11 ;
ICA12 ¼ ICA11 þ IL12 ; ICA13 ¼ ICA12 þ IL13

ICA14 ¼ ICA13 þ IL14 ; ICA15 ¼ ICA14 þ IL15 ; ICA16 ¼ ICA15 þ IL16 ; IL1 ¼ ICB1 þ ICB16 ;
IL9 ¼ ICB8 þ ICB9 ; ICB2 ¼ ICB1 þ IL2

ICB3 ¼ ICB2 þ IL3 ; ICB4 ¼ ICB3 þ IL4 ; ICB5 ¼ ICB4 þ IL5 ; ICB6 ¼ ICB5 þ IL6 ;
ICB7 ¼ ICB6 þ IL7 ; ICB8 ¼ ICB7 þ IL8
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 201

ICB9 ¼ ICB10 þ IL10 ; ICB10 ¼ ICB11 þ IL11 ; ICB11 ¼ ICB12 þ IL12 ; ICB12 ¼ ICB13 þ IL13 ;
ICB13 ¼ ICB14 þ IL14 ; ICB14 ¼ ICB15 þ IL15
ICB15 ¼ ICB16 þ IL16 : S1 is OFF for RF signal transmitter feeding:
IRP ¼ 0 ) ICA16 þ ICA1 þ IL1 ¼ 0
X
8 X
8 X
8
ICA1 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk ; ICA2 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk ; ICA3 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk ;
k¼2 k¼3 k¼4
X
8 X
8 X
8
ICA4 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk ; ICA5 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk ; ICA6 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk
k¼5 k¼6 k¼7
X
16 X
15
ICA7 ¼ ICA8 þ IL8 ; ICA16 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk ; ICA15 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk ;
k¼10 k¼10
X
14 X
13 X
12
ICA14 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk ; ICA13 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk ; ICA12 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk
k¼10 k¼10 k¼10

X
11
ICA11 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk ; ICA10 ¼ ICA9 þ IL10 ;
k¼10
X
16 X
16
ICB1 ¼ IL9  ICB16  ILk ; ICB2 ¼ IL9  ICB16  ILk
k¼2;k6¼9 k¼3;k6¼9

X
16 X
16
ICB3 ¼ IL9  ICB16  ILk ; ICB4 ¼ IL9  ICB16  ILk ;
k¼4;k6¼9 k¼5;k6¼9

X
16 X
16
ICB5 ¼ IL9  ICB16  ILk ; ICB6 ¼ IL9  ICB16  ILk
k¼6;k6¼9 k¼7;k6¼9

X
16 X
16
ICB7 ¼ IL9  ICB16  ILk ; ICB8 ¼ IL9  ICB16  ILk ;
k¼8;k6¼9 k¼10

X
16 X
16
ICB9 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk ; ICB10 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk
k¼10 k¼11
X
16 X
16
ICB11 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk ; ICB12 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk ;
k¼12 k¼13
X
16 X
16
ICB13 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk ; ICB14 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk
k¼14 k¼15

ICB15 ¼ ICB16 þ IL16 ; IL1 ¼ ICB1 þ ICB16 : We get the following additional
expressions:
202 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

2 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL5 d 2 IL2 d 2 IL4 2


 ðIL2  IL4 Þ ¼   2  ½  2 ;  ðIL6  IL8 Þ
LC dt 2 dt 2 dt 2 dt LC
2 2 2 2
d IL5 d IL9 d IL6 d IL8
¼ þ 2½ 2  2 
dt2 dt2 dt dt

2 d 2 IL9 d 2 IL13 d 2 IL10 d 2 IL12 2


 ðIL10  IL12 Þ ¼ þ þ2 ½ 2  ;  ðIL14  IL16 Þ
LC dt 2 dt 2 dt dt2 LC
2 2 2 2
d IL1 d IL13 d IL14 d IL16
¼ 2
 2
þ2  ½ 2  
dt dt dt dt2

We add the first and second above equations:

2 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL9
½*  fðIL2  IL4 Þ þ ðIL6  IL8 Þg ¼ þ 2
LC dt2 dt2
d IL2 d IL4 d 2 IL6 d 2 IL8
2 2
½ 2  2 þ  2 
dt dt dt2 dt

We add the third and forth above equations:

2
½**  fðIL10  IL12 Þ þ ðIL14  IL16 Þg
LC
d 2 IL1 d 2 IL9 d 2 IL10 d 2 IL12 d 2 IL14 d 2 IL16
¼ 2
þ 2
þ2 ½ 2  þ  
dt dt dt dt2 dt2 dt2

Integrating the last two results ([**]–[*]) gives the following:

2
 fIL10  IL12 þ IL14  IL16 þ IL2  IL4 þ IL6  IL8 g
LC
d 2 IL10 d 2 IL12 d 2 IL14 d 2 IL16
¼2½ 2  þ 
dt dt2 dt2 dt2
d 2 IL2 d 2 IL4 d 2 IL6 d 2 IL8
þ  2 þ  2 
dt2 dt dt2 dt

We define new global variables for our Cylindrical RF network antennas system.

Y ¼ IL10  IL12 þ IL14  IL16 þ IL2  IL4 þ IL6  IL8


dIL10 dIL12 dIL14 dIL16 dIL2 dIL4 dIL6 dIL8
X¼  þ  þ  þ  ;
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt dt
dY dX 1
¼X; ¼ Y
dt dt L  C

Due to RF antenna copper leg parasitic effect, we get copper leg’s current and
current derivative with delay s1–k and s2–k (k is leg number index, k = 1,…,16). We
consider for simplicity s1–1 = s1–2 =  = s1–16; s2–1 = s2–2 =  = s2–16.
0
ILk ðtÞ ! ILk ðt  s1k Þ ; ILk ðtÞ ¼ dILkdtðtÞ ; ILk
0 0
ðtÞ ! ILk ðt  s2k Þ. We consider no
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 203

dI 0 ðtÞ
delay effect on Lkdt . YðtÞ ! Yðt  s1 Þ ; XðtÞ ! Xðt  s2 Þ: s1 ¼ s11 ¼ s12 ¼
1
   ¼ s116 s2 ¼ s21 ¼ s22 ¼    ¼ s216 : dYdt ¼ Xðt  s2 Þ; dt ¼ LC  Yðt  s1 Þ.
dX

To find the Equilibrium points (fixed points) of the Cylindrical RF network


antennas system is by limt!1 Yðt  s1 Þ ¼ YðtÞ and limt!1 Xðt  s2 Þ ¼ XðtÞ.
dt ¼ 0 ; dt ¼ 0; 8 t  s1 ; t  s2 9ðt  s1 Þ  t; ðt  s2 Þ  t , t ! 1.
dY dX

We get two equations and the only fixed point is E ð0Þ ðY ð0Þ ; X ð0Þ Þ ¼ ð0; 0Þ.

ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ


Y ð0Þ ¼ IL10  IL12 þ IL14  IL16 þ IL2  IL4 þ IL6  IL8 ¼ 0
0 ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ 0 ð0Þ
X ð0Þ ¼ IL10  IL12 þ IL14  IL16 þ IL2  IL4 þ IL6  IL8 ¼ 0

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of Cylindrical RF network antennas system consists in adding to
coordinates [Y X] arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½y x  ekt , and
retaining the first order terms in y, x. The system of two homogeneous equations
leads to a polynomial characteristics equation in the eigenvalues k. The polynomial
characteristics equations accept by set the below current and current derivative
respect to time into two Cylindrical RF network antennas system equations.
Cylindrical RF network antennas system fixed values with arbitrarily small incre-
ments of exponential form ½y x  ekt are: i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed
point), i = 2 (third fixed point).

YðtÞ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y  ekt ; X ¼ X ðiÞ þ x  ekt ; Yðt  s1 Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y  ekðts1 Þ ; Xðt  s2 Þ


¼ X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts2 Þ 8 i ¼ 0; 1; 2

We choose the above expressions for our YðtÞ; XðtÞ as small displacement [y x]
from the system fixed points at time t = 0. Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y ; Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼
X ðiÞ þ x for k\0; t [ 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k [ 0; t [ 0 is
Unstable. Our Cylindrical RF network antennas system tend to the selected fixed
point exponentially for k\0; t [ 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed
point exponentially. k is the eigenvalue parameter which establish if the fixed point
is stable or unstable, additionally his absolute value (jkj) establish the speed of flow
toward or away from the selected fixed point [2–6] (Table 2.4).

Table 2.4 Cylindrical RF network antennas system eigenvalues options


k<0 k>0
t=0 Y(t = 0) = Y(i) + y Y(t = 0) = Y(i) + y
X(t = 0) = X(i) + x X(t = 0) = X(i) + x
t>0 Y(t) ¼ YðiÞ þ y  ejkjt Y(t) ¼ YðiÞ þ y  ejkjt
X(t) ¼ XðiÞ þ x  ejkjt X(t) ¼ XðiÞ þ x  ejkjt
t!∞ Y(t ! ∞) = Y(i) Y(t ! 1; k [ 0)  yejkjt
X(t ! ∞) = X(i) X(t ! 1; k [ 0)  xejkjt
204 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for
Cylindrical RF network antennas system currents and currents derivative respect to
time are

dYðtÞ Yðt þ DtÞ  YðtÞ Y ðiÞ þ y  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½Y ðiÞ þ y  ekt 


¼ lim ¼ lim
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
kt kDt kt
y  e  ½e  1 e 1 þ kDt
kDt y  e  ½1 þ k  Dt  1
¼ lim ! lim ¼ k  y  ekt
Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
dXðtÞ Xðt þ DtÞ  XðtÞ X ðiÞ þ x  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½X ðiÞ þ x  ekt 
¼ lim ¼ lim
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
x  ekt  ½ekDt  1 ekDt 1 þ kDt x  ekt  ½1 þ k  Dt  1
¼ lim ! lim ¼ k  x  ekt
Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt

and the time derivative of the above equations:

dYðtÞ dXðtÞ
¼ y  k  ekt ; ¼ x  k  ekt ;
dt dt
dYðt  s1 Þ
¼ y  k  ekðts1 Þ ¼ y  k  ekt  es1 k
dt
dXðt  s2 Þ
¼ x  k  ekðts2 Þ ¼ x  k  ekt  es2 k
dt

First we take the Cylindrical RF network antennas (Y) differential equation:


dY
dt ¼ X and adding to it coordinates [Y X] arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential form ½y x  ekt and retaining the first order terms in y, x.
k  y  ekt ¼ X ðiÞ þ x  ekt ; X ði¼0Þ ¼ 0 ; k  y þ x ¼ 0: Second we take the
1
Cylindrical RF network antennas (X) differential equation: dX dt ¼ LC  Y and adding
to it coordinates [Y X] arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½y x  ekt
and retaining the first order terms in y, x.
1
k  x  ekt ¼ LC  ½Y ðiÞ þ y  ekt  ; Y ði¼0Þ ¼ 0 ; k  x ¼  LC
1
 y ¼ 0. We define
Yðt  s1 Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y  ekðts1 Þ ; Xðt  s2 Þ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts2 Þ then we get two
delayed differential equations respect to adding to it coordinates [Y X] arbitrarily
small increments of exponential form ½y x  ekt . In the equilibrium points:
Y ð0Þ ¼ 0 ; X ð0Þ ¼ 0

k  y  ekt ¼ X ð0Þ þ x  ekðts2 Þ ; X ð0Þ ¼ 0 ) k  y


1
¼ x  eks2 ; k  x  ekt ¼  ½Y ð0Þ þ y  ekðts1 Þ 
LC

Y ð0Þ ¼ 0 ) k  x¼ LC
1
 y  eks1 . We get the following set of eigenvalues
ks2 1
equations: k  y þ x  e ¼ 0 ; LC  y  eks1  k  x ¼ 0
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 205

The small increments Jacobian of our Cylindrical RF network antennas.


  ! !
k eks2 y 0
1 ks1  ¼

LC e k x 0
 
k eks2
A  k  I ¼ 1 ks1 ; detjA  k  I j ¼ 0 ; Dðk; s1 ; s2 Þ
LC  e k
1
¼ k2 þ  eks1  eks2
LC

We have three stability analysis cases: s1 = s ; s2 ¼ 0 or s2 = s ; s1 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼


s2 ¼ s otherwise s1 6¼ s2 . We need to get characteristics equations as all above
stability analysis cases. We study the occurrence of any possible stability switching
resulting from the increase of value of the time delay s for the general characteristic
equation Dðk; sÞ. Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks . The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ
P
is Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ nk¼0 Pk ðsÞ  kk ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k2 þ P3 ðsÞ  k3 þ . . .
P
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ m k¼0 qk ðsÞ  k ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ
k

k þ q2 ðsÞ  k þ . . .
2

The first case we analyze is when there is delay in Cylindrical RF network


antennas leg’s current and no delay in antennas leg’s current derivative or opposite
s1 = s ; s2 ¼ 0 & s1 = 0 ; s2 = s [4, 5].

1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ 0; s2 Þ ¼ k2 þ  eks2 ¼ k2 þ  eks ; Dðk; s1 ; s2 ¼ 0Þ
L  C s2 ¼s LC
1 1
¼ k2 þ  eks1 js1 ¼s ¼ k2 þ  eks
LC LC

Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks : The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is

X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  kk ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k2 ¼ k2 ; P2 ðsÞ ¼ 1 ;
k¼0
P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0 ; P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0
P
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ m k¼0 qk ðsÞ  k ¼ q0 ðsÞ ¼ LC.
k 1

Our Cylindrical RF network antennas system second order characteristic equa-


tion: Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ bðsÞ  k  eks þ cðsÞ þ dðsÞ  eks .
Then aðsÞ ¼ 0 ; b(sÞ = 0 ; c(sÞ = 0; d(sÞ¼ LC 1
; s 2 R þ 0 and aðsÞ; b(sÞ; c(sÞ;
d(sÞ : R þ 0 ! R are differentiable functions of class C 1 ðR þ 0 Þ such that
c(sÞ þ d(sÞ ¼ LC
1
6¼ 0 for all s 2 R þ 0 and for any s; b(sÞ; d(sÞ are not simultane-
ously zero. We have
206 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Pðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ cðkÞ ¼ k2 ; Qðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðk; sÞ


1
¼ bðsÞ  k þ dðsÞ ¼
LC

We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðkÞ can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is for any real number x; pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0
x2 þ LC1
6¼ 0; Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ ðc  x2 Þ2 þ x2  a2 
ðx2  b2 þ d 2 Þ
Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4  ðLCÞ
1
2 ; Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies x 
4 1
ðLCÞ2
¼ 0 and its roots
pffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
are given by x2þ ¼ 12  fðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ þ Dg ¼ 2D ; x2 ¼ 12  fðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  Dg
pffiffiffi
¼  2D
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  4  ðc2  d 2 Þ ¼ L24C2 . Therefore the following holds:
pffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
2  x2  ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ ¼  D; 2  x2 ¼  D. Furthermore

PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ cðsÞ  x2 ðsÞ ¼ x2 ðsÞ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ  aðsÞ ¼ 0; QR ði  x; sÞ


1
¼ dðsÞ ¼
LC

QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ  bðsÞ ¼ 0 hence sin hðsÞ ¼ PR ðix;sÞQI ðix;sÞ þ PI ðix;sÞQR ðix;sÞ
jQðix;sÞj2

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼  ;
jQði  x; sÞj2
ðc  x Þ  x  b þ x  a  d
2
sin hðsÞ ¼ ¼0
x 2  b2 þ d 2

cos hðsÞ ¼  ðcxx2Þd þ x ab


2 2

b2 þ d 2 ¼ x2  L  C which jointly with x4  ðLCÞ


1
2 ¼ 0.

Defines the maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I , n 2 N0 that are continuous and


differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use Theorem 1.2. This prove the
Theorem 1.3 and Theorem 1.4.
Remark: a, b, c, d parameters are independent of delay parameter s even we use
aðsÞ; b(sÞ; c(sÞ; d(sÞ.
The second case we analyze is when there is delay both in Cylindrical RF
network antennas leg’s current and current time derivative s1 ¼s; s2 ¼ s [4, 5].

1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ  eks  eks ; Dðk; sÞ
LC
¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks
Pn
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k¼0 Pk ðsÞ  kk ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ
k þ P2 ðsÞ  k2 ¼ k2
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 207

P ðsÞ ¼ 1 ; P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0 ; P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0: The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ ; Qm ðk; sÞ ¼


Pm 2 ks
k¼0 qk ðsÞ  k ¼ LC  e
k 1
.
Taylor expansion: eks  1  k  s þ k 2s since we need n > m [BK] analysis
2 2

P
we choose eks  1  k  s then we get Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ m k¼0 qk ðsÞ  k ¼ LC 
k 1

ð1  k  sÞ ¼ LC1
 LC
1
 k  s.
q0 ðs; kÞ ¼ LC ; q1 ðsÞ ¼  LC
1 1
 s ; q2 ðsÞ ¼ 0: Our Cylindrical RF network
antennas system second order characteristic equation: Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ 
1
k þ bðsÞ  k  eks þ cðsÞ þ dðsÞ  eks then aðsÞ ¼ 0 ; bðsÞ ¼ LC  s cðsÞ ¼ 0 ;
dðsÞ ¼ LC and in the same manner like our previous case analysis: Pðk; sÞ ¼
1

Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k2 ; Qðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ LC 1


 LC
1
 k  s. We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼
Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That is for any real
number x; pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; x2  i  x  LC 1
 s þ LC
1
6¼ 0

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ; Pði  x; sÞ ¼ x2 ;


PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2 ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ 0
1 1 1
Qðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ i  x   sþ ; QI ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x   s;
LC LC LC
1
QR ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼
LC
jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ P2I þ P2R ; jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ Q2I þ Q2R ; jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ P2I þ P2R ¼ x4
s2 1 s2 1
jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x2  2
þ 2
; Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  2

ðL  CÞ ðL  CÞ ðL  CÞ ðL  CÞ2

s 2
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies x4  x2  ðLCÞ 2 
1
ðLCÞ2
¼ 0; Fx ¼ 4  x3  2  x
s2 s 2

ðLCÞ2
¼ 2  x  ½2  x2  ðLCÞ2

x2  2  s s
Fs ¼ ; PIx ¼ 0 ; PRx ¼ 2  x ; QIx ¼  ; QRx ¼ 0 ;
ðL  CÞ 2 LC
x
PIs ¼ 0 ; PRs ¼ 0 ; QRs ¼ 0 ; QIs ¼ 
LC

The expressions for U, V can be derive easily [BK]: x ¼ s

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ ;


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

V ¼ L2xC2 ; U ¼ L2 sC2 ; xs ¼  FFxs and we get the expression:


208 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

x2 2s xs


ðLCÞ2 ðLCÞ2
xs ¼  2 ¼ s2
: Defines the maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ;
2x½2x2  s 2  ½2x2  
ðLCÞ ðLCÞ2

s 2 I , n 2 N0 .
Defines the maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I , n 2 N0 that are continuous and
differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use Theorem 1.2. This prove the
Theorem 1.3 and Theorem 1.4.
Remark: Taylor approximation for eks  1  k  s gives us good stability
analysis approximation only for restricted delay time interval.
Our Cylindrical RF network antennas homogeneous system for y, x leads to a
characteristic equation for the eigenvalue k having the for PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0;
second case s1 ¼s; s2 ¼ s; Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ LC 1
 eks  eks : We esti-
mate eks  1  k  s. Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ LC 1
 ð1  k  sÞ  eks
ks
Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k þ ðk  LC  s þ LCÞ  e : We use different parameters
2 1 1

terminology from our last characteristics parameters definition: k ! j; pk ðsÞ !


aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 2; m ¼ 1: Additionally Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! QðkÞ
P P
then PðkÞ ¼ 2j¼0 aj  k j and QðkÞ ¼ 1j¼0 cj  k j ; PðkÞ ¼ k2 ; Qðk; sÞ ¼ k  LC 1

s þ LC.1

n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m and aj ; cj 6¼ R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable


function of s such that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0. In the following “−” denotes complex and
conjugate. PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s. And the
coefficients : faj ðC; LÞ; cj ðC; L; sÞg 2 R depend on Cylindrical RF network
antennas C, L, s values. a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ 1 ; c0 ¼ LC 1
; c1 ¼  LC
1
 s unless
strictly necessary, the designation of the variation arguments ðC; L; sÞ will subse-
quently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 þ c0 ¼ LC1
6¼ 0; LC
1
6¼ 0 8 C,L,s 2 R þ i.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root of characteristic
equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic function of k for which the following
requirements of the analysis (see kuang [5], Sect. 3.4) can also be verified in the
present case [4, 5].
(a) If k = i  x; x 2 R then P(i  x) + Q(i  x) 6¼ 0, i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire ðC; L; sÞ
domain of interest.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek
0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
kLC
1
s þ LC
1
Indeed, in the limit jQ(kÞ=PðkÞj ¼ j k 2 j
s
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ; Fðx; sÞ ¼ x  x2  ðLCÞ
2
2 
1 4
ðLCÞ2
has at
most a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a bi-cubic polynomial in x
(second degree in x2 ).
(d) Each positive root xðC; L; sÞ of F(xÞ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable with
respect to C; L; s. This condition can only be assessed numerically.
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 209

In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have Pði  xÞ ¼


Pði  xÞ and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ thus k ¼ i  x, x [ 0 may be on eigenvalue of
characteristic equation. The analysis consists in identifying the roots of character-
istic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k—plane, where by
increasing the parameters C; L and delay s, Rek may, at the crossing, change its
sign from (−) to (+), i.e. from stable focus E ð0Þ ðY ð0Þ ; X ð0Þ Þ ¼ ð0; 0Þ to an unstable
one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of
the partial derivatives with respect to C; L and antenna parameters.
^1 ðCÞ ¼ ð@ Re k 1 @ Re k
@C Þk¼ix ; L; s ¼ const; ^ ðLÞ ¼ ð @L Þk¼ix ; C; s ¼ const
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ RekÞ@s ; C; L; where x 2 R : For the first case s ¼s; s ¼ s we
k¼ix þ 1 2
get the following results PR ði  xÞ ¼ x2 ; PI ði  xÞ ¼ 0; QR ði  xÞ ¼ LC
1
;
QI ði  xÞ ¼ xs
LC .
s 2
s 2
FðxÞ ¼ 0 yield to x4  x2  ðLCÞ2 
1
ðLCÞ2
¼ 0; v2 ¼ x4 ; v ¼ x2 ; v2  v  ðLCÞ2

 ðLCÞ
1
2 ¼ 0

sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s2 1 s4 1
v¼ 2
  4
þ4  ; v ¼ x2 ) x
2  ðL  CÞ 2 ðL  CÞ ðL  CÞ2
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
u s 2 1 s4 1
¼ t 2
  4
þ4 
2  ðL  CÞ 2 ðL  CÞ ðL  CÞ2

s4 s
2

ðLCÞ4
þ 4  ðLCÞ 1
2 [0 always and additional for x 2 R; x2 ¼ 2ðLCÞ 
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s4 s2
ðLCÞ þ 4  ðLCÞ and there are two options: first always exist 2ðLCÞ2 þ 2 
1 1 1
2
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi

s4
ðLCÞ4
þ 4  ðLCÞ 1
2 [ 0.
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s2 s4 s2 s4
2  2  þ 4  ðLCÞ 2 \0; x ¼ 2  LC  fLC  þ 4g.
1 1 2 1 1
Second 2ðLCÞ ðLCÞ4 ðLCÞ2
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s4 s2
ðLCÞ2
þ 4 [ LC ; Not exist and always negative for any Cylindrical RF net-
work antennas overall parameters values. We choose only the (+) option (first).
Writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼
i  x into Cylindrical RF network antennas characteristic equation, x must satisfy
the following: sin x  s ¼ gðxÞ ¼ PR ðixÞQI ðixÞ þ PI ðixÞQR ðixÞ
jQðixÞj2
.
cos x  s ¼ hðxÞ ¼  PR ðixÞQR ðixÞ þ PI ðixÞQI ðixÞ
jQðixÞj2
; where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view
of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R. Furthermore, it follows above sin x  s
and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and adding the sides, x must be a positive
root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note that FðxÞ is dependent of s. Now it is important to notice that if s 62 I
(assume that I R þ 0 is the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for s 62 I ,
xðsÞ is not define. Then for all s in I xðsÞ is satisfies that Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0.
210 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Then there are positive xðsÞ solutions of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we analyze stability
switches. For any s 2 I where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, we can
define the angle hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . .

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

and the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ
þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R ;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; C; L and Cylindrical RF network antennas param-
eters ðL; C; s etc:; Þ indicate the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first con-
centrate on ^ðxÞ, remember in kðL; C; s; etc:; Þ and xðL; C; s; etc:; Þ, and keeping
all parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in reference
[BK]. Differentiating Cylindrical RF network antennas characteristic equation
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and inverting the
derivative, for convenience, one calculates.
Remark: x ¼ L; C; s; etc:;

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ

where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i  x, and bearing i Pði  xÞ ¼
Pði  xÞ; Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ,
then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ and i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ and that on the sur-
face jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains

@k i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þ1 jk¼ix ¼ ð Þ:
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ; Q ¼ QR þ i  QI


Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ;
P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I :
When (x) can be any Cylindrical RF network antennas parameters L, C, And
time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments ði  x; xÞ,
and where Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ ; xx ¼ Fx =Fx .
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 211

Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ. We define U and V:

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ;


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = s. V ¼ L2xC2 ; U ¼ L2 sC2

x2  2  s
P2 ¼ x4 ; Fs ¼ ; PR ðx; sÞ ¼ x2 ; PI ðx; sÞ ¼ 0 ;
ðL  CÞ2
xs 1
QI ðx; sÞ ¼  ; QR ðx; sÞ ¼
LC LC
x
PIs ¼ 0; PRs ¼ 0; QRs ¼ 0; QIs ¼  ) V 6¼ 0;
LC
@F s2
¼ Fx ¼ 4  x3  2  x 
@x ðL  CÞ2

@F s 2
@x ¼ 2  x  ½2  x2  ðLCÞ 2 ; Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 and differentiating with respect to s
xs

and we get Fx  @x @x Fs @x
@s þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) xs ¼ @s ¼  Fx ; @s ¼
ðLCÞ2
s2
½2x2  
ðLCÞ2

@Rek @x xs
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; xs ¼ ¼
@s k¼ix @s ½2  x2  ðL  CÞ2  s2 
2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g
Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 
s 2
s  ½L21C2 þ x4  þ i  x  ½2  x2  ðLCÞ 2
¼ Ref x s
g
þ i  x  ½L21C2 þ x4 
2

ðLCÞ2
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@s k¼ix
@x U  @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  signfs  þxþ g
@s jPj2

s2
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signf2  x  ½2  x2  g
ðL  CÞ2
xs
s ðLCÞ2 x
xs L2 C 2 ½ s2
þ L2 C 2
½2x2  
ðLCÞ2 ðLCÞ2
 signfs  ½ þxþ g
s
½2  x2  ðLCÞ
2
2
x4

s 2
We define new variables: w1 ; w2 ; w3 : w1 ðx; s; L; CÞ ¼ 2  x  ½2  x2  ðLCÞ 2
212 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

xs
s ðLCÞ2 x
xs L2 C2 ½ s2
þ L2 C 2
ðLCÞ2 ½2x2  
ðLCÞ2
w2 ðx; s; L; CÞ ¼ s  ½ ; w3 ðx; s; L; CÞ ¼
s2
½2  x2  ðLCÞ 2 x4

sign f^1 ðsÞg ¼ sign ½w1   sign ½w2 þ x þ w3 . We check the sign of ^1 ðsÞ
according the following rule.
If sign[K−1(s)] > 0 then the crossing proceeds from (−) to (+) respectively
(stable to unstable). If sign[K−1(s)] < 0 then the crossing proceeds from (+) to (−)
respectively (unstable to stable). Anyway the stability switching can occur only for
specific x, s. Since it is a very complex function, we recommend to solve it
numerically rather than analytic. We plot the stability switch diagram based on
different delay values of our Cylindrical RF network antennas system. Dðk; s1 ¼
s
 eks  k  LC  eks : Taylor expansion: eks  1  k  s þ k 2s
2 2
s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ LC
1

since we need n > m [BK] analysis we choose eks  1  k  s then we get our
Cylindrical RF network antennas system second order characteristic equation:
Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ bðsÞ  k  eks þ cðsÞ þ dðsÞ  eks (Table 2.5).

s 1
aðsÞ ¼ 0; bðsÞ ¼  ; cðsÞ ¼ 0 ; dðsÞ ¼ ; Fðx; sÞ
LC LC
2 2 2 2
¼ jPði  x; sÞj  jQði  x; sÞj ¼ ðc  x Þ þ x2  a2  ðx2  b2 þ d 2 Þ

s 2
s 2
Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  ðLCÞ 2 
1
ðLCÞ2
hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies x4  x2  ðLCÞ 2 
p ffiffiffiffi
1
ðLCÞ2
¼ 0 and its roots are given by x þ ¼ 2  fðb þ 2  c  a Þ þ Dg ¼
2 1 2 2
p ffiffiffiffi s2
2  f D þ ðLCÞ2 g
1

1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi s2
x2 ¼  fðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  Dg ¼  f D þ g;
2 2 ðL  CÞ2
s2 þ 4
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  4  ðc2  d 2 Þ ¼
ðL  CÞ2

s þ4 2
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ  4  ðc2  d 2 Þ ¼ ðLCÞ 2 therefore the following holds:

pffiffiffiffi PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
2  x2  ðb2 þ 2  c  a2 Þ ¼  D; sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2

Table 2.5 Cylindrical RF sign½Fx  sign½V þPx2 s U þ x þ xs  s sign½^1 ðsÞ


network antennas system
stability switching criteria ± ± +
± –
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 213

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼  ;
jQði  x; sÞj2
ðc  x2 Þ  x  b þ x  a  d x3  s  L  C
sin hðsÞ ¼ ¼
x 2  b2 þ d 2 ðx2  s2 þ 1Þ

cos hðsÞ ¼  ðcxx2Þd þ x ab


2 2
¼ ðxx2 sLC
2
b2 þ d 2 2 þ 1Þ : We consider Cylindrical RF antenna

which mounted outside a Pyrex glass tube of diameter 32 cm and length 50 cm.
The RF antenna consists of 16 copper (Cu) legs equally spaced by 6.7 cm inter-
connected with capacitors of 2.47nF. Copper leg diameter is equal to 1 mm and
length 30 cm = 300 mm (<Pyrex glass tube length, 50 cm). We consider for
Copper (Cu), relative permeability is one. f = 10 MHz is the typical testing fre-
quency for cylindrical (birdcage) antenna. L—inductance (nH), l—length of copper
leg (mm), d—diameter of copper leg, f—testing frequency. l > 100  d
(300 > 100  1 mm), d2  f > 1 mm2  MHz (1 mm2  10 MHz > 1 mm2  MHz).
L = 365.4 nH. L ¼ 15  l  ½lnð4ld  1 ¼ 365:4 nH. For our stability switching anal-
ysis we choose typical Cylindrical RF network antennas parameters values (as
calculated): C ¼ 2:47 nF; L ¼ 365:4 nH; Rp ¼ 100Ohm then
LC ¼ 0:00110798 10 . We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We
1 18

ignore negative, complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. The
below table gives the list.
Remark: We know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies it roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values, which xi are complex or imag-
inary numbered, then unable to analyze stability [6, 7]. We find those x; s values
which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative, complex, and imaginary values of x
for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001::10 and we can be express by 3D function
s2
Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  ðLCÞ 2 
1
ðLCÞ2

X
2
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ U0 þ U2  x2 þ U4  x4 ¼ U2k  x2k
k¼0

s 2 P4
U0 ¼  ðLCÞ
1
2 ; U2 ¼ 
ðLCÞ2
; U4 ¼ 1 hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 U2k
sx ¼ 0.
2k

Uj ! Phij. Running MATLAB script for s values (s 2 ½0:001::10) gives the


following results.
MATLAB script: Tau=0.001;C=2.47*1e-9;L=365.4*1e-9;Phi0=-1/(C*L*C*L);
Phi2=-(Tau*Tau)/(C*L*C*L); Phi4=1;p=[Phi4 0 Phi2 0 Phi0];r=roots(p)
(Tables 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 and 2.12).
We can summery our xi ðsÞ results for xi ðsÞ [ 0 and real number (ignore
complex, negative, and imaginary values). We exclude from our table the high and
real xi ðsÞ values (1.0e+007*, 1.0e+012*,…,1.0e+016*) and add results for s = 15
and s = 20 s (Figs. 2.14, 2.15 and Table 2.13).
214 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Table 2.6 Cylindrical RF s s = 0.01 s s = 0.001 s


network antennas system
roots xi ðsÞ x1 1.0e+013* 1.0e+012*
x2 −1.1080 −1.1080
x3 1.1080 1.1080
x4 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x5 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i

Table 2.7 Cylindrical RF s s=1s s = 0.1 s


network antennas system
roots xi ðsÞ x1 1.0e+015* 1.0e+014*
x2 −1.1080 −1.1080
x3 1.1080 1.1080
x4 −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x5 −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i

Table 2.8 Cylindrical RF s s=3s s=2s


network antennas system
roots xi ðsÞ x1 1.0e+015* 1.0e+015*
x2 3.3240 −2.2160
x3 −3.3240 2.2160
x4 0 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x5 0 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i

Table 2.9 Cylindrical RF s s=5s s=4s


network antennas system
roots xi ðsÞ x1 1.0e+015* 1.0e+015*
x2 −5.5399 4.4319
x3 5.5399 −4.4319
x4 0.0000 + 0.0000i 0 + 0.0000i
x5 0.0000 − 0.0000i 0 − 0.0000i

Table 2.10 Cylindrical RF s s=7s s=6s


network antennas system
roots xi ðsÞ x1 1.0e+015* 1.0e+015*
x2 −7.7559 6.6479
x3 7.7559 −6.6479
x4 0.0000 + 0.0000i 0 + 0.0000i
x5 0.0000 − 0.0000i 0 − 0.0000i

Matlab: plot([0 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20], [3.3286 1.1080


1.1080 1.1080 1.1080 2.2160 3.3240 4.4319 5.5399 6.6479 7.7559 8.8639 9.9719
1.1080 1.6620 2.2160],‘-or’). We plot 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. s:0!10;
x:0!100. We define additional MATLAB script parameters x!w, s!t.
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 215

Table 2.11 Cylindrical RF s s=9s s=8s


network antennas system
roots xi ðsÞ x1 1.0e+015* 1.0e+015*
x2 9.9719 8.8639
x3 −9.9719 −8.8639
x4 0 + 0.0000i 0 + 0.0000i
x5 0 − 0.0000i 0 − 0.0000i

Table 2.12 Cylindrical RF s s=0s s = 10 s


network antennas system
roots xi ðsÞ x1 1.0e+007* 1.0e+016*
x2 −3.3286 −1.1080
x3 −0.0000 + 3.3286i 1.1080
x4 −0.0000 − 3.3286i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x5 3.3286 −0.0000 − 0.0000i

Fig. 2.14 Cylindrical RF


network F(x,s) function for
s1 = s2 = s

Matlab: [w,t]=meshgrid(1:1:100,0:0.01:10);C=2.47*1e-9; L=365.4*1e-9;


f=w.*w.*w.*w-w.*w.*(t.*t)/(C*L*C*L)-1/(C*L*C*L);meshc(f); % x ! w; s ! t.
We get two possible real values for x which fulfil Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0
Fðx ¼ 3:3286 or x ¼ 1:1080 . . . or x¼ 2:2160; sÞ ¼ 0; s 2 ½0:001::10. Next is
to find those x, s values which fulfil sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; sinðx  sÞ ¼ PR QjQj
I þ PI QR
2 and
cos hðsÞ ¼ . . .
216 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Fig. 2.15 Cylindrical RF


network F(x,s) function for
s1 = s2 = s

Table 2.13 Cylindrical RF network antennas system positive and real root xi ðsÞ values and
sinðx  sÞ; cosðx  sÞ values
x sLC
cosðx  sÞ ¼ ðxx2 sLC
3 2
s[s] x sin ðx  sÞ ¼ ðx2 s2 þ 1Þ 2 þ 1Þ

0 3.3286 0=0 1 6¼ 9.9e−15


0.001..1 1.1080 −1.22e−18 … −5.51e−16 1.108e−15 … 4.973e−16
2 2.2160 −9.5e−16 2.1e−16
3 3.3240 −9.9e−16 9.9e−17
4 4.4319 −9.9e−16 5.62e−17
5 5.5399 −9.9e−16 3.6e−17
6 6.6479 −9.99−16 2.5055e−17
7 7.7559 −9.9966e−16 1.8413e−17
8 8.8639 −9.9980e−16 1.4099e−17
9 9.9719 −9.9988e−16 1.1141e−17
10 1.1080 −9.9193e−17 8.9525e−18
15 1.6620 −9.9841e−17 4.0048e−18
20 2.2160 −9.9950e−17 2.2552e−18

ðPR  QR þ PI  QI Þ
cosðx  sÞ ¼  ; jQj2 ¼ Q2R þ Q2I ;
jQj2
x3  s  L  C x2  L  C
sinðx  sÞ ¼ ; cosðx  sÞ ¼
ðx2  s2 þ 1Þ ðx2  s2 þ 1Þ

x3 sLC x2 LC


ðx2 s2 þ 1Þ \0 & ðx2 s2 þ 1Þ [0 then sinðx  sÞ\0 and cosðx  sÞ [ 0;
2  p [ x  s [ p2  3.
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 217

Fig. 2.16 Cylindrical RF


network g1 ðs; xÞ F(x,s)
function for s1 = s2 = s

We plot the stability switch diagram based on different delay values of our
Cylindrical RF network antennas system. ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k
@s Þk¼ix ¼
2
Ref2½U þ sjPj  þ iFx
F þ i2½V þ xjPj2 
g
s

@Rek 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2
@Rek 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2

signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ sign½w1   sign½w2 þ x þ w3 : We define the following new


functions (Figs. 2.16 and 2.17):

g1 ¼ w1 ; g2 ¼ w2 þ x þ w3 ; signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ sign½g1   sign½g2 

Matlab: [w,t]=meshgrid(1:.01:100,0:0.01:10);C=2.47*1e-9; L=365.4*1e-9;


f=2*w.*(2*w.*w-(t.*t./(C*L*C*L)));meshc(f) % x ! w; s ! t.
Matlab: [w,t]=meshgrid(1:.1:10,0:0.1:10);C=2.47*1e-9; L=365.4*1e-9;m=w.
*t./(2*w.*w.*(L*C*L*C)-t.*t); f=t.*m+w+(m.*t./(L*C*L*C)+w./(L*C*L*C)) ./
(w.*w.*w.*w);meshc(f) % x ! w; s ! t.
gðTauÞ ¼ g1 ðTauÞ  g2 ðTauÞ ¼ ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k
@s Þk¼ix : The stability switch occur
only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation: s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the
x sLC
3
x LC
2
solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ ðx 2 s2 þ 1Þ ; cos hðsÞ ¼ ðx2 s2 þ 1Þ when x ¼ x þ ðsÞ if only x þ

is feasible. Additionally When all Cylindrical RF network antennas parameters are


known and the stability switch due to various time delay values s is describe in the
below expression (Theorem 1.5):
218 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Fig. 2.17 Cylindrical RF network g2 ðs; xÞ function for s1 = s2 = s

signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx ðxðsÞ; sÞg  signfs


UðxðsÞÞ  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ VðxðsÞÞ
 xs ðxðsÞÞ þ xðsÞ þ g
jPðxðsÞÞj2

Remark: We know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies it roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which xi is complex or imaginary
number, then unable to analyse stability [4, 5].
Discussion: We consider Cylindrical RF network antennas system. Due to RF
antenna copper leg parasitic effect we get copper leg’s current and current
derivative with delay s1–k and s2–k (k is leg number index, k = 1,…,16). Those
delays causes to stability switching for our Cylindrical RF network antennas. We
draw our Cylindrical RF network antennas equivalent circuit and get system dif-
ferential equations. Our variables are Y, X which are function of RF antenna copper
leg’s current and current derivative. Our system dynamic behavior is dependent on
circuit overall parameters and parasitic delay in time. We keep all circuit parameters
fix and change, parasitic delay over various values s 2 ½0:001::10. Our analysis
results extend that of in the way that it deals with stability switching for different
delay values. This implies that our system behavior of the circuit cannot inspect by
short analysis and we must study the full system. Several very important issues and
possibilities were left out of the present discussion. One possibility is the stability
switching by circuit parameters. Every circuit’s parameter variation can change our
system dynamic and stability behavior. This case can be solved by the same
methods combined with alternative and more technical hypotheses. Moreover,
numerical simulations for the Cylindrical RF network antennas model studied in
references suggest that this result can be extended to enhance models with more
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 219

general functions. Still another extension of our results would be to treat the case of
delayed Cylindrical RF network antennas leg’s higher derivative degree of current.
It would be extremely desirable to confirm these cases by mathematical proofs.
Conclusion: Cylindrical RF network antennas system is characterized by para-
sitic effects which can influence Cylindrical RF network antennas system stability
in time. There are two main Cylindrical RF network antennas variables which are
affected by antenna legs parasitic effects, Y and X functions of antenna leg’s
currents and currents derivatives respectively. Each Cylindrical RF network
antennas system variable under parasitic effects is characterized by time delay
respectively. The two time delays are not the same, but can be categorized to some
sub cases due to antenna leg parasitic behavior. The first case we analyze is when
there is delay in Cylindrical RF network antennas leg’s current and no delay in
antennas leg’s current derivative or opposite. The second case we analyze is when
there is delay both in Cylindrical RF network antennas leg’s current and current
time derivative [4, 5]. For simplicity of our analysis we consider in the second case
all delays are the same (there is a difference but it is neglected in our analysis). In
each case we derive the related characteristic equation. The characteristic equation
is dependent on Cylindrical RF network antennas system overall parameters and
parasitic time delay. Upon mathematics manipulation and [BK] theorems and
definitions we derive the expression which gives us a clear picture on
Cylindrical RF network antennas map. The stability map gives all possible options
for stability segments, each segment belongs to different time delay value segment.
Cylindrical RF network antennas system’s stability analysis can be influenced either
by system overall parameter values. We left this analysis and do not discuss it in the
current subchapter.
Lemma 1.1 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive and real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0.
Defined for s 2 I, which is continuous and differentiable. Assume further that if
k ¼ i  x, x 2 R, then Pn ði  x; sÞ þ Qn ði  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R hold true. Then the
functions Sn ðsÞ; n 2 N0 , are continuous and differentiable on I.
Theorem 1.2 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 defined for
s 2 I; I R þ 0 , and at some s 2 I, Sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for some n 2 N0 then a pair of
simple conjugate pure imaginary roots k þ ðs Þ ¼ i  xðs Þ; k ðs Þ ¼ i  xðs Þ of
Dðk; sÞ ¼ 0 exist at s ¼ s which crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if
dðs Þ [ 0 and cross the imaginary axis from right to left if dðs Þ\0 where

dRek dSn ðsÞ


dðs Þ ¼ signf jk¼ixðs Þ g ¼ signfFx ðxðs Þ; s Þg  signf j g
ds ds s¼s
n ðsÞ
The theorem becomes signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix g ¼ signfD
1=2
g  signfdSds js¼s g.
Theorem 1.3 The characteristic equation: s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s
220 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ  k þ bðsÞ  k  eks þ cðsÞ þ dðsÞ  eks ; Dðk; s1 ; s2 Þ


1 1
¼ k2 þ k   eks2 þ  ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
C1  R1 C1  f#

Has a pair of simple and conjugate pure imaginary roots k ¼ xðs Þ; xðs Þ
real at s 2 I if Sn ðs Þ ¼ s  sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for some n 2 N0 . If xðs Þ ¼ x þ ðs Þ, this
pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary roots crosses the imaginary axis from left
to right if d þ ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from right to left if
dSn ðsÞ
d þ ðs Þ\0 where d þ ðs Þ ¼ signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix þ ðs Þ g ¼ signf ds js¼s g: If
xðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ, this pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary roots cross the
imaginary axis from left to right if d ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from
right to left If d ðs Þ\0 where d ðs Þ ¼ signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix ðs Þ g ¼
n ðsÞ
signfdSds js¼s g: If x þ ðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ ¼ xðs Þ then Dðs Þ ¼ 0 and
signfdRe k 0 
ds jk¼ixðs Þ g ¼ 0, the same is true when Sn ðs Þ ¼ 0. The following result can
be useful in identifying values of s where stability switches happened.
Theorem 1.4 Assume that for all s 2 I, xðsÞ is defined as a solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼
0 then d ðsÞ ¼ signfD1=2 ðsÞg  signD ðsÞ.

D ðsÞ ¼ x2  ½ðx2  b2 þ d 2 Þ þ a0  ðc  x2 Þ þ b  d 0  b0  d  a  c0 


þ x  x0  ½s  ðx2  b2 þ d 2 Þ
daðsÞ 0 dbðsÞ
 b  d þ a  ðc  x2 Þ þ 2  x2  a; a0 ¼ ;b ¼ ;
ds ds
dcðsÞ 0 ddðsÞ
c0 ¼ ;d ¼
ds ds
Theorem 1.5 We need to approve the following expression:

signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx ðxðsÞ; sÞg  signfs


UðxðsÞÞ  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ VðxðsÞÞ
 xs ðxðsÞÞ þ xðsÞ þ g
jPðxðsÞÞj2

The basic assumption: ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k


@s Þk¼ix

@Rek @Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s @s k¼ix
2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
¼
Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2
@Rek 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 221

signfFs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2 g [ 0 and xs ¼  FFxs then

@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g ¼ signfFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
@s k¼ix
Fs
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx  fðV þ x  P2 Þ   ðU þ s  P2 Þgg;
Fx
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx  fðV þ x  P2 Þ þ xs  ðU þ s  P2 Þgg
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx  fV þ xs  U þ x  P2 þ xs  s  P2 gg;
V þ xs  U
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfP2  Fx  f þ x þ xs  sgg
P2
V þ xs  U
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfP2 g  signfFx g  signf þ x þ xs  sg; signfP2 g [ 0
P2
V þ xs  U
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  signf þ x þ xs  sg:
P2

2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System


Cavity Parasitic Elements Stability Analysis

Tunnel diode is used in many engineering applications and specialy as a microwave


oscillator. Tunnel diode is the p-n junction device that exhibits negative resistance.
That means when the voltage is increased the current through it decreases. We can
consider the tunnel diode as an oscillator and high-frequency threshold (trigger)
device since it operated at frequencies far greater than the tetrode could, well into
the microwave bands. Applications for tunnel diodes included local oscillators for
UHF television tuners, trigger circuits in oscilloscopes, high-speed counter circuits,
and very fast-rise time pulse generator circuits. The tunnel diode can also be used as
low-noise microwave amplifier. The total current that flows through Tunnel Diode
(TD) is a summation of three elements, Itun, Idiode, Iexcess. Idiode is the P-N junction
VD
½ð Þ1
current Idiode  Is  e gVth ; Is—saturation current, η—ideality factor,
Vth = k ∙ T/q. VD—tunnel diode voltage. Itun is the tunnel current
VD m
½ð Þ 
Itun ¼ VRD0  e V0 ; Typically m = 1…3, Vo = 0.1…0.5v, Ro is the tunnel diode
resistance in the ohmic region, VD is the tunnel diode voltage. Iexcess is an additional
VD VV
tunneling current related to parasitic tunneling via impurities Iexcess ¼ VRDV  e½ Vex  .
This current usually determines the minimum (valley) current Iv, RV and Vex are the
empirical parameters; in high quality diodes, RV  RO, Vex = 1…5v. ID is the
V V
½ðgVD Þ1 ½ð VD Þm 
tunnel diode current, ID ¼ Idiode þ Itun þ Iexcess ¼ Is  e th þ VD
R0 e 0 þ VD
RV 
V V
½ DVex V 
e : If we build a circuit with the Tunnel Diode (TD) and resistor.
222 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Case I: the circuit has three possible operating points. The middle point (inter-
section between TD’s characteristic NDR segment and work line) is typically
unstable, depending on parasitic L and C components. The circuit will operate at
one of the other two points (intersection between TD’s characteristic positive dif-
ferential resistance segment and work line).
Case II: The circuit has only one operating point (intersection between TD’s
characteristic NDR segment and work line). The total differential resistance is
negative because R < |Rd|. Depending on the L and C components, the circuit can
be stable (amplifier) or unstable (oscillator). Rd is a TD’s differential resistance
Rd ¼ @V @ID  DID . R is a TD’s static resistance R ¼ ID . Typically for linear (Ohmic)
D DVD VD

components R = Rd and for semiconductor devices R 6¼ Rd [47–50]. The tunnel


diode has a region in its voltage current characteristic where the current decreases
with increased forward voltage, known as its negative resistance region. This
characteristic makes the tunnel diode useful in oscillators and as a microwave
amplifier (case II). The basic circuit structure of Tunnel Diode (TD) as a microwave
oscillator includes TD biased voltage and connection to microwave cavity. TD’s
biasing circuit is constructed from DC voltage Vb, inductor Lb which block
oscillation from Vb source and capacitor Cb which shorts to ground Vb bias volt-
age’s oscillations. The DC voltage Vb biases the tunnel diode TD into its negative
resistance region and also supplies the power used in amplifying the input signal Vi.
We have two topological circuit structures: first, switch S1 is ON and switch and S2
is OFF (growing or decreasing oscillations) and second, switch S1 is ON and S2 in
ON (bypass our signal source Vi) and our circuit functions as a oscillator.
A microwave cavity or radio frequency (RF) cavity is a special type of resonator,
consisting of a closed (or largely closed) metal structure that confines electro-
magnetic fields in the microwave region of the spectrum. The structure is either
hollow or filled with dielectric material. A microwave cavity acts similarly to a
resonant circuit with extremely low loss at its frequency of operation. Microwave
resonant cavities can be represented and thought of as simple LC circuits. For a
microwave cavity, the stored electric energy is equal to the stored magnetic energy
at resonance as is the case for a resonant LC circuit. We can represent our
microwave cavity as resonant LC circuit. Due to cavity parasitic effects there are
delays in the currents which flow through equivalent resonant L and C elements and
TD’s voltage derivative in time. s1 is the time delay for the TD’s voltage derivative
in time. s2 is the time delay for the current flows through C element. RL is the load
resistance. Load resistance (RL) is chosen so that RL < |Rd| in the TD’s charac-
teristic NDR region. At the TD operating point, the total circuit differential resis-
tance is negative. We have transient in resonant cavity after turning the bias voltage
to ON state (switch S1 moves to ON state, S2 is in OFF state) (Fig. 2.18).
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 223

Fig. 2.18 Tunnel diode as a microwave oscillator

If Rd > 0 or Rd < 0 and RL > |Rd| then oscillation goes down. If Rd < 0 and
RL < |Rd| then the oscillations goes up. The resonator circuit with NDR can
oscillate. Maximum frequency of TD-oscillator is limited by the characteristic
tunneling time fMAX ð2p
1
Þ  ðstun
1
Þ, tunneling time in TDs is extremely small: 1ps,
fMAX > 100 GHz. We represent our Microwave resonant cavities thought of as
simple LC circuits. For a microwave cavity, the stored electric energy is equal to the
stored magnetic energy at resonance as is the case for a resonant LC circuit. In
terms of inductance and capacitance, the resonant frequency for a given mnl mode
can be written as Lmnl ¼ l  kmnl2
 Vcavity ; Cmnl ¼ k4 Ve cavity :
mnl
Vcavity is the cavity volume, kmnl is the mode wavenumber and e, l are per-
mittivity and permeability respectively. The resonant frequency (f) for a given mnl
mode can be written as fmnl ¼ 2ppffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1
L C
¼ q
1 ffiffiffiffiffi
le
:
mnl mnl 2p
k2
mnl

We consider for our stability analysis the case of switch S1 is ON and S2 in ON


(bypass our signal source Vi) and our TD is functions as a microwave oscillator.
First we need to locate our TD’s voltages segment into negative resistance region
Rd ¼ @V
@ID \0. The expression for tunnel diode current is
D
224 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

X
3 V
½ðgVD Þ1 VD ½ðVVD Þm  VD ½VDVVV 
ID ¼ nðVD Þ ¼ gi ðVD Þ ¼ Is  e th þ e 0 þ  e ex ;
i¼1
R0 RV
V
½ðgVD Þ1
g1 ðVD Þ ¼ Is  e th
VD ½ðVVD Þm  VD ½VDVVV 
g2 ðVD Þ ¼  e 0 ; g3 ðVD Þ ¼  e ex ;
R0 RV
@g1 ðVD Þ 1 @VD ½ðgVVD Þ1
¼ Is    e th
@ID g  Vth @ID
@g2 ðVD Þ 1 @VD ½ðVVD Þm  VD VD 1 @VD V
½ð D Þm 
¼  e 0 þ  fm  ð Þm1   g  e V0
@ID R0 @ID R0 V0 V0 @ID
@g2 ðVD Þ VD m 1 @VD ½ðVVD Þm 
¼ f1  m  ð Þ g   e 0 ;
@ID V0 R0 @ID
@g3 ðVD Þ VD 1 @VD ½VDVVV 
¼ ð1 þ Þ   e ex
@ID Vex RV @ID
X 3
@ID X 3
@gi X 3
@gi @g1 ðVD Þ @g2 ðVD Þ @g3 ðVD Þ
ID ¼ gi ðVD Þ ) ¼ ) ¼ þ þ ¼1
i¼1
@I D i¼1
@I D i¼1
@I D @ID @ID @ID
1 @VD ½ðgVVD Þ1 VD 1 @VD ½ðVVD Þm 
Is    e th þ f1  m  ð Þm g   e 0
g  Vth @ID V0 R0 @ID
VD 1 @VD ½VDVVV 
þ ð1 þ Þ   e ex ¼ 1
Vex RV @ID

@VD 1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD 1 ½ðVD Þm  VD 1 ½VDVVV 
 ½Is   e gVth þ f1  m  ð Þm g   e V0 þ ð1 þ Þ  e ex  ¼ 1
@ID g  Vth V0 R0 Vex RV

@VD 1
¼
@ID Is  gVth  e th
V
½ðgVD Þ1 m
V
½ð D Þm 
þ f1  m  ð V0 Þ g  R10  e V0 þ ð1 þ  R1V  e½
VD VV
Vex 
Vex Þ
1 V D VD

@VD 1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD 1 ½ðVD Þm  VD
\0 ) fIs   e gVth þ f1  m  ð Þm g   e V0 þ ð1 þ Þ
@ID g  Vth V0 R0 Vex
1 ½VDVVV 
  e ex g\0
RV

VV is TD’s characteristic valley voltage, VP is TD’s characteristic peak voltage.


It is numerical analysis to find our TD’s voltages segment into negative resis-
tance region Rd ¼ @V@ID \0 by specific TD’s parameters (VP \VD \VV ).
D
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 225

VB = VB1 = VB2 (S2 ON). VD ¼ VB  VA ; VA ¼ VRL ¼ VC ¼ VL ; IRL ¼ VRAL

dVA dVC dIL VE  VB3


IC ¼ C  ¼C ; VA ¼ VL ¼ L  ; I D ¼ I Lb ¼ I R b ; I R b ¼ ; IC b
dt dt dt Rb
dVE
¼ Cb  jdVE ¼ 0; VE ¼ Vb
dt dt ¼0

dI
VLb ¼ VB3  VB ¼ Lb  dtLb ¼ Lb  dIdtD ; ID ¼ nðVD Þ; ID ¼ IRL þ IC þ IL ;
Vb—Constant supple voltage, VD—Tunnel diode voltage, VC—Capacitor voltage,
VL—Inductor voltage. Vi—Input voltage (is bypass in our case, S2 ON state).

Z
VA dVA 1
nðVD Þ ¼ þC  þ  VA  dt;
RL dt L
Z
dIL VA 1
VA ¼ L  )  dt ¼ dIL ) IL ¼  VA  dt
dt L L
dnðVD Þ 1 dVA d 2 VA 1
¼  þ C  2 þ  VA ;
dt RL dt dt L
dID
Vb ¼ VRb þ VLb þ VD þ VA ¼ ID  Rb þ Lb  þ VD þ VA
dt
dID dVA dID d 2 ID dVD
VA ¼ Vb  ID  Rb  Lb   VD ; jdVb ¼0 ¼ Rb   Lb  2 
dt dt dt dt dt dt
dVA dID d 2 ID dVD d 2 VA d 2 ID d 3 ID d 2 V D
jdVb ¼ Rb   Lb  2  ) 2 ¼ Rb  2  Lb  3  2
dt dt ¼0 dt dt dt dt dt dt dt

We get the following expression:

dnðVD Þ 1 dID d 2 ID dVD d 2 ID d 3 ID d 2 VD


¼  ½Rb   Lb  2   þ C  ½Rb  2  Lb  3  2 
dt RL dt dt dt dt dt dt
1 dID
þ  ½Vb  ID  Rb  Lb   VD 
L dt

dnðVD Þ 1 dID 1 d 2 ID 1 dVD d 2 ID d 3 ID


¼ Rb    Lb   2    C  Rb  2  C  Lb  3
dt RL dt RL dt RL dt dt dt
2
d VD 1 1 1 dID 1
 C  2 þ  Vb   ID  Rb   Lb    VD
dt L L L dt L
226 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

dnðVD Þ 1 1 dID Rb Lb d 2 ID 1
¼  Vb   ID  Rb   ½ þ   2  ½Lb  þ C  Rb 
dt L L dt RL L dt RL
d 3 ID 1 1 dVD d 2 VD
 C  Lb  3   VD   C 2
dt L RL dt dt
V V VD VV
½ðgVD Þ1 ½ð VD Þm 
ID ¼ nðVD Þ ¼ Is  e th þ VD
R0 e 0 þ VD
RV  e½ Vex  and we need to find
dnðVD Þ
dt :

dnðVD Þ 1 ½ð D Þ1 dVD


V 1 dVD ½ðVVD Þm 
¼ Is   e gVth  þ  e 0
dt g  Vth dt R0 dt
VD VD 1 dVD V
½ð D Þm 
þ  ðm  ½ m1   Þ  e V0
R0 V0 V0 dt
1 dVD ½VDVVV  VD 1 dVD ½VDVVV 
þ   e ex þ    e ex
RV dt RV Vex dt

dnðVD Þ 1 ½ð D Þ1 dVD


V 1 ½ðVVD Þm  dVD
¼ Is   e gVth  þ e 0 
dt g  Vth dt R0 dt
VD VD m1 m ½ðVVD Þm  dVD
 ½   e 0 
R0 V0 V0 dt
1 ½VDVVV  dVD VD VD VV dVD
þ  e ex  þ  e½ Vex  
RV dt RV  Vex dt

dnðVD Þ 1 ½ð D Þ1 dVD


V VD 1 ½ðVD Þm 
¼ Is   e gVth  þ ð1  m  ½ m Þ   e V0
dt g  Vth dt V0 R0
dVD VD 1 ½VDVVV  dVD
 þ ð1 þ Þ  e ex 
dt Vex RV dt

dnðVD Þ 1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD 1 ½ðVD Þm  VD 1
¼ fIs   e gVth þ ð1  m  ½ m Þ   e V0 þ ð1 þ Þ
dt g  Vth V0 R0 Vex RV
VD VV dVD
 e½ Vex  g 
dt

1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD 1 ½ðVD Þm  VD 1
wðVD Þ ¼ Is   e gVth þ ð1  m  ½ m Þ   e V0 þ ð1 þ Þ
g  Vth V0 R0 Vex RV
VD VV
 e½ Vex 

DÞ dwðVD Þ
dID
dt ¼ dnðV
dt ¼ wðVD Þ  dVdtD : We need to find the expression: dt .
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 227

dwðVD Þ 1 dVD ½ðgVVD Þ1 2 VD m1 1 dVD 1


V
½ð VD Þm 
¼ Is    e th  m  ½      e 0
dt ðg  Vth Þ2 dt V0 V0 dt R0
VD 1 VD 1 dVD ½ðVVD Þm 
 ð1  m  ½ m Þ   m  ð Þm1   e 0
V0 R0 V0 V0 dt
1 dVD 1 ½VDVVV 
þ    e ex
Vex dt RV
VD 1 1 dVD ½VDVVV 
þ ð1 þ Þ    e ex
Vex RV Vex dt

dwðVD Þ 1 ½ð D Þ1 dVD


V VD VD
¼ Is  2
 e gVth   fm þ ð1  m  ½ m Þg  m  ð Þm1
dt ðg  Vth Þ dt V0 V0
1 ½ð D Þ  dVD
V m VD 1 dVD ½VDVVV 
  e V0  þ f1 þ ð1 þ Þg    e ex
R0  V0 dt Vex Vex  RV dt

dwðVD Þ 1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD
¼ fIs  2
 e gVth  f1 þ m  ð1  ½ m Þg
dt ðg  Vth Þ V0
VD m1 m VD m
½ð Þ 
ð Þ   e V0
V0 R0  V0
VD 1 VD VV dVD
þ f2 þ g  e½ Vex  g 
Vex Vex  RV dt

1 V
½ðgVD Þ1 VD m
w1 ðVD Þ ¼ Is  2
e th  f1 þ m  ð1  ½  Þg
ðg  Vth Þ V0
VD m1 m V
½ð D Þm 
ð Þ   e V0
V0 R0  V0
VD 1 VD VV dwðVD Þ dVD
þ f2 þ g  e½ Vex  ; ¼ w1 ðVD Þ 
Vex Vex  RV dt dt

dID dnðVD Þ dVD d 2 ID d 2 nðVD Þ


¼ ¼ wðVD Þ  ; 2 ¼
dt dt dt dt dt2
dwðVD Þ dVD d 2 VD
¼ ½  þ wðVD Þ  ½ 2 
dt dt dt

d 2 ID d 2 nðVD Þ dVD dVD d 2 VD


¼ ¼ w 1 ðVD Þ   ½  þ wðV D Þ  ½ 
dt2 dt2 dt dt dt2
2
dVD 2 d VD
¼ w1 ðVD Þ  ½  þ wðVD Þ  ½ 2 
dt dt

We define the following new variables: X(t), Y(t). X ¼ dVdtD ; Y ¼ dVdtA


228 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

dnðVD Þ 1 dVA d 2 VA 1 dVD 1 dY 1


¼  þ C  2 þ  VA ) wðVD Þ  ¼  Y þC  þ  VA
dt RL dt dt L dt RL dt L
dVA dID d 2 ID dVD
jdVb ¼0 ¼ Rb   Lb  2  )
dt dt dt dt dt
dVD dVD 2 d 2 VD
Y ¼ Rb  wðVD Þ   Lb  fw1 ðVD Þ  ½  þ wðVD Þ  ½ 2 g  X
dt dt dt
dVD dVD 2 d 2 VD
Y ¼ Rb  wðVD Þ   Lb  w1 ðVD Þ  ½   Lb  wðVD Þ  ½ 2   X
dt dt dt
dX
Y ¼ Rb  wðVD Þ  X  Lb  w1 ðVD Þ  X  Lb  wðVD Þ 
2
X
dt
dVD 1 dY 1 1 dY 1
wðVD Þ  ¼ Y þC  þ  VA ) wðVD Þ  X ¼ Y þC  þ  VA
dt RL dt L RL dt L
1 dY 1 dY wðVD Þ 1 1
wðVD Þ  X ¼ Y þC  þ  VA ) ¼ X Y   VA
RL dt L dt C RL  C LC
dX
Y ¼ Rb  wðVD Þ  X  Lb  w1 ðVD Þ  X 2  Lb  wðVD Þ  X )
dt
dX Rb Lb  w1 ðVD Þ 2 1 1
¼ X X X Y 
dt Lb Lb  wðVD Þ Lb  wðVD Þ Lb  wðVD Þ
dX 1 1 w ðVD Þ 2 1
¼ ðRb þ Þ X  1 X Y 
dt wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb  wðVD Þ

We can summery our Tunnel diode as a microwave oscillator system’s differ-


ential equations:

dX 1 1 w ðVD Þ 2 1
¼ ðRb þ Þ X 1 X Y 
dt wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb  wðVD Þ
dY wðVD Þ 1 1 dVD dVA
¼ X Y   VA ; ¼X; ¼Y
dt C RL  C LC dt dt

To find our system equilibrium points (fixed points), we set dX dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0


dY

     
dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0. Then our fixed points are E ðX ; Y ; VD ; VA Þ ¼ ð0; 0; VD ; 0Þ:
dVD dVA

At equilibrium points: limt!1 Xðt  s1 Þ ¼ limt!1 XðtÞ 8 t  s1 ; limt!1 Yðt  s2 Þ


¼ limt!1 YðtÞ 8 t  s2 .
Under delay parameters we get the following Tunnel diode system’s Delay
Differential Equation (DDEs).
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 229

dt ; dt ;...
dX dY
Remark: Delay parameters don’t effect variables derivative in time

dX 1 1 w ðVD Þ 2 1
¼ ðRb þ Þ   Xðt  s1 Þ  1  X ðt  s1 Þ  Yðt  s2 Þ 
dt wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb  wðVD Þ
dY wðVD Þ 1 1
¼  Xðt  s1 Þ   Yðt  s2 Þ   VA ;
dt C RL  C LC
dVD dVA
¼ Xðt  s1 Þ ; ¼ Yðt  s2 Þ
dt dt

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of tunnel diode system consists in adding to its coordinates
½X Y VD VA  arbitrarily small increments of exponential terms x y vD vA , and retaining
the first order terms in ½x y vD vA   ekt . The system of four homogeneous equations
leads to a polynomial characteristics equation in the eigenvalue k. The polynomial
characteristics equations accept by set the below TD’s variables equations (delayed
and undelayed) into four tunnel diode equations. Tunnel diode’s fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x y vD vA   ekt are: i = 0 (first
fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc. Under TD’s
variables X(t) and Y(t), delays in time: XðtÞ ! Xðt  s1 Þ; YðtÞ ! Yðt  s2 Þ
jIC ðtÞ¼CdVA ¼CYðtÞ ) IC ðtÞ ! IC ðt  s2 Þ:
dt

ðiÞ
XðtÞ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x  ekt ; YðtÞ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y  ekt ; VD ðtÞ ¼ VD þ vD  ekt ;
ðiÞ
VA ðtÞ ¼ VA þ vA  ekt
Xðt  s1 Þ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ ; Yðt  s2 Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y  ekðts2 Þ for i ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .
ðiÞ
Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x; Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y; VD ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VD þ vD ;
ðiÞ
VA ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA þ vA
Xðt  s1 Þjt¼0 ¼ X ðiÞ þ x  eks1 ; Yðt  s2 Þjt¼0 ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y  eks2 for i ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .

for k < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 is Unstable.
Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for k < 0, t > 0 other-
wise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the eigenvalue
parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or Unstable, additionally his
absolute value (|k|) establish the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point [2–5] (Table 2.14).
The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for TD system’s
variables are (k = 1, 2):
230 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Table 2.14 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a microwave oscillator system eigenvalues options
k<0 k>0
t=0 Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x
Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VD þ vD VD ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VD þ vD
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VA ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA þ vA VA ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA þ vA
ðiÞ jkjt ðiÞ
t>0 XðtÞ ¼ X þx  e XðtÞ ¼ X þ x  ejkjt
YðtÞ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y  ejkjt YðtÞ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y  ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD ðtÞ ¼ VD þ vD  ejkjt VD ðtÞ ¼ VD þ vD  ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VA ðtÞ ¼ VA þ vA  ejkjt VA ðtÞ ¼ VA þ vA  ejkjt
for i ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . . for i ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .
t!∞ Xðt ! 1Þ ¼ X ðiÞ Xðt ! 1Þ  x  ejkjt
Yðt ! 1Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ Yðt ! 1Þ  y  ejkjt
ðiÞ
VD ðt ! 1Þ ¼ VD VD ðt ! 1Þ  vD  ejkjt
VA ðt
ðiÞ
! 1Þ ¼ VA VA ðt ! 1Þ  vA  ejkjt

dXðtÞ Xðt þ DtÞ  XðtÞ X ðiÞ þ x  ekðt þ DtÞ  ½XðtÞ þ x  ekt  ekDt 1 þ Dtk
¼ lim ¼ lim !
dt Dt!1 Dt Dt!1 Dt
x  ekt  ðekDt  1Þ x  ekt  ð1 þ k  Dt  1Þ dYðtÞ
lim ¼ ¼ x  k  ekt ; ¼ y  k  ekt
Dt!1 Dt Dt dt
dVD ðtÞ dVA ðtÞ dXðt  s1 Þ
¼ vD  k  ekt ; ¼ vA  k  ekt ; ¼ x  k  ekt  eks1 ;
dt dt dt
dYðt  s2 Þ
¼ y  k  ekt  eks2
dt

First we take the Tunnel diode’s voltage derivative differential equations


(dXðtÞ
dt ¼ . . .). dt ¼ ðRb þ wðVD ÞÞ  Lb  X 
First TD’s system differential equation: dX 1 1

w1 ðVD Þ
wðVD Þ  X  Y  Lb wðV and adding to it’s coordinates ½X Y VD VA  arbitrarily small
2 1

increments of exponential form ½x y vD vA   ekt and retaining the first order terms in
x y vD vA .

dX 1 1 w ðVD Þ 2 1
¼ ðRb þ Þ   Xðt  s1 Þ  1  X ðt  s1 Þ  Yðt  s2 Þ 
dt wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb  wðVD Þ
1 1
x  k  ekt ¼ ðRb þ ðiÞ
Þ   ½X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ 
wðV þ vD  e Þ kt L b
D
ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ 1
 ðiÞ
 ½X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ 2  ½Y ðiÞ þ y  ekðts2 Þ   ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ Lb  wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 231

1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD 1 ½ðVD Þm  VD 1
wðVD Þ ¼ Is   e gVth þ ð1  m  ½ m Þ   e V0 þ ð1 þ Þ
g  Vth V0 R0 Vex RV
VD VV
 e½ Vex 

ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD ! VD þ vD  ekt ) wðVD Þ ! wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ

1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ ðiÞ
½V þ vD ekt 
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ 1 ½ð D gV Þ1 ½V þ vD  ekt  m
fIs  e th þ ð1  m  ½ D  Þ
g  Vth V0
ðiÞ
þ vD ekt  m ðiÞ
1 ½ð½VD Þ  ½VD þ vD  ekt 
 e V0
ð1 þ Þ
R0 Vex
ðiÞ
þ vD ekt VV
1 ½½VD 
 e Vex g
RV
ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
1
¼ 1
ðiÞ þ C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ: We need to find C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ wðVD Þ
function.

1 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
þ C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ) C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ wðVD Þ
1 1
¼ ðiÞ
 ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ wðVD Þ

1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ V
½ðgVD Þ1
ðiÞ V
½ð VD Þm 
ðiÞ V VV
 R1V  e½ Vex 
VD VD D
Is  gV1 th  e th þ ð1  m  ½ V0 m Þ  R10  e 0 þ ð1 þ Vex Þ

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


VD þ vD ekt m vD ekt m kt
; B ¼ vDVe0
V VD
Mathematical assumptions: ½ V0  ¼ ½ VD0 þ V0  ; A¼ V0

P
n
xi
m
e  e    e ¼ e i¼1 ;ðA þ
x1 x2 xn
 BÞ    
m m m
¼ Am þ  Aðm1Þ  B þ  Aðm2Þ  B2 þ    þ
1 2 m1
 A  Bðm1Þ þ Bm
232 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

ðiÞ m ðiÞ ðiÞ   ðiÞ


VD þ vD  ekt VD vD  ekt m VD m m V vD  ekt
½  ¼½ þ  ¼½  þ  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ 
V0 V0 V0 V0 1 V0 V0
  ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt 2
þ  ½ D ðm2Þ  ½ 
2 V0 V0
  ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt ðm1Þ vD  ekt m
þ  þ ½ D ½  þ½ 
m1 V0 V0 V0

ðiÞ m ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


V þ vD  ekt V vD  ekt m V vD  ekt m V
½ D  ¼½ D þ  ¼½ D þ  ¼ ½ D m
V0 V0 V V0 V0 V0
! 0 !
ðiÞ kt ðiÞ
m V vD  e m V v2  e2kt
þ  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ þ  ½ D ðm2Þ  D 2
1 V0 V0 2 V0 V0
  ðiÞ ðm1Þ
m V v  eðm1Þkt De
vm mkt
þ  þ ½ D  D ðm1Þ
þ
m1 V0 V0 V0m

D  0 8 m
2 then
We consider vm

ðiÞ m ðiÞ ðiÞ


VD þ vD  ekt V vD  ekt m V
½  ¼½ D þ  ¼ ½ D m
V0 V0 V0 V0
  ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt
þ  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½  þ ðe ! 0Þ
1 V0 V0
 
V
ðiÞ m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ m
½f½ VD  þ ½ VD  ½  þ ðe!0Þg
½V þ vD ekt  m
D
V0
½ð D Þ  0
1 0
e V0
¼e
 
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
V
ðiÞ f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g
½ VD m 1 0
¼e 0 e
ðiÞ ðiÞ
½V þ vD ekt  ½V  ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ð D Þ1 ½ D 1 vD ekt ½V þ vD ekt VV V VV vD ekt
gVth gVth ½ gVth 
; e½ 
¼ e½ Vex   e½ Vex 
D D
e ¼e e Vex

1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ ðiÞ
½V þ vD ekt 
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ 1 ½ð D gV Þ1 ½V þ vD  ekt  m
fIs  e th þ ð1  m  ½ D  Þ
g  Vth V0
ðiÞ
þ vD ekt  m ðiÞ
1 ½ð½VD Þ  ½VD þ vD  ekt 
 e V0
þ ð1 þ Þ
R0 Vex
ðiÞ
þ vD ekt VV
1 ½½VD 
 e Vex g
RV
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 233

1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ 1
½V
v ekt
½ D 1

V
ðiÞ
½D 
gVth
fIs  e  e gVth þ ð1  m  f½ D m
g  Vth V0
  ðiÞ kt
m V vD  e
þ  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ gÞ
1 V0 V0
 
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ
V f ½ VD  ½ DV g
1 ½ VD m 1 0 0
 e 0 e
R0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD vD  ekt 1 ½VDVVV  ½vDVekt 
þ fð1 þ Þþ g  e ex  e ex g
Vex Vex RV

1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ 1
½V 
½ D 1 v ekt V
ðiÞ
gVth ½D 
fIs  e  e gVth þ ð1  m  ½ D m Þ
g  Vth V0
 
m V ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ
ðiÞ
f ½ VD  ½ DV g
1 ½VVD m 1 0 0
 e 0 e
R0
  ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt
m  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ 
1 V0 V0
 
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ
1 ½VVD m f 1 ½ V0  ½ V0 g
D D

 e 0 e
R0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD 1 ½VDVVV  ½vDVekt  vD  ekt
þ ð1 þ Þ  e ex  e ex þ
Vex RV Vex
ðiÞ
1 ½VDVVV  ½vDVekt 
  e ex  e ex g
RV
ðiÞ
We define the following global parameters: Bi ¼ Bi ðVD Þ 8 i ¼ 1; 2; 3;
ðiÞ
B4 ¼ B4 ðVD ; vD Þ
ðiÞ
½V  ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 ½ D 1 V 1 ½VD m
gV
B1 ¼ Is   e th ; B2 ¼ ð1  m  ½ D m Þ   e V0 ; B3
g  Vth V0 R0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD 1 ½VDVVV 
¼ ð1 þ Þ  e ex
Vex RV
234 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

1 1
ðiÞ
¼  
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½ gVth 
þ B3  e½ Vex 
0
fB1  e þ B2  e 1
ðiÞ
vD  ekt 1 ½VDVVV  ½vDVekt 
þ   e ex  e ex
Vex RV
  ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt
m  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ 
1 V0 V0
 
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ f ½ VD  ½ DV g
V
1 ½ VD m 1 0 0
 e 0 e g
R0

We define the following parameter:


ðiÞ   ðiÞ ðiÞ
vD  ekt 1 ½VDVVV  ½vDVekt  m VD ðm1Þ vD  ekt 1 ½VVD m
B4 ¼   e ex  e ex  m  ½  ½  e 0
Vex  RV 1 V0 V0 R0
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
f ½ V  ½ V g
e 1 0 0

1 1
ðiÞ
¼   ;
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ m V
ðiÞ
v ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ DV g v ekt
½ gV  1 0 0
½ DVex 
fB1  e th þ B2  e þ B3  e þ B4 g
1 1
¼ 3
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ P
Bk
k¼1

1 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
þ C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ) C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ wðVD Þ
1 1
¼ ðiÞ
 ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ wðVD Þ

ðiÞ 1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼  
m ðiÞ
V v ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ DV g vD ekt
½  1 þ B3  e½ Vex 
0 0
fB1  e gVth þ B2  e þ B4 g
1
 3
P
Bk
k¼1
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 235

 
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
P
3 v ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½D
gVth  1
 B3  e½ Vex   B4
0
½ Bk   B1  e
 B2  e
ðiÞ
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼ k¼1
 
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ V  ½ V g vD ekt P
3
½ gV  1 þ B3  e½ Vex  þ B4 Þ  ½ Bk 
0 0
ðB1  e th þ B2  e
k¼1

Binomial coefficients:
  Y
n k n  iþ1 n  ðn  1Þ    ðn  k þ 1Þ
¼ ¼ j n¼m
k i¼1 k! k! k¼1
Y1
¼ i¼1
ðn  i þ 1Þj n¼m ¼ m
k¼1
   
n n! m
¼ 8 0 k n; n ¼ m & k ¼ 1 ) ¼ m;
k k!ðn  kÞ! 1
  Y
n k
n  iþ1
¼
k i¼1
k!
 
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
P
3 vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½ gV  1
 B3  e½ Vex   B4
0
½ Bk   B1  e
 B2  e th
ðiÞ
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
k¼1
 
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
vD e kt f ½ V  ½ V g vD ekt P
3
½  1 þ B3  e½ Vex  þ B4 Þ  ½ Bk 
0 0
ðB1  e gVth þ B2  e
k¼1

½
vD ekt
gVth 
vD  ekt 1 v2  e2kt vD  ekt
e ¼ 1þ þ  D þ    jvk 08 k
2 ¼ 1 þ þ ðe ! 0Þ
g  Vth 2 ½g  Vth  2 D g  Vth
vD  ekt
 1þ
g  Vth
 
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt   ðiÞ
f ½ V  ½ V g
m V vD  ekt 1
1  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½
0 0
e ¼1 þ
1 V0 V0 2
 2 ðiÞ
m V v 2
 e 2kt
 ½ D 2ðm1Þ  ½ D 2  þ   
1 V0 V0
 
ðiÞ
f
m V
½ VD ðm1Þ ½
vD ekt   ðiÞ
V0 g VD ðm1Þ vD  ekt
m
e 1 0
¼1  ½ ½  þ ðe ! 0Þ
V0 1 V0
  ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt
1  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ 
1 V0 V0
236 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

vD ekt vD  ekt 1 v2D  e2kt vD  ekt vD  ekt


e½ Vex  ¼ 1þ þ  2
þ  ¼ 1þ þ ðe ! 0Þ  1 þ
Vex 2 Vex Vex Vex

X   ðiÞ
3
vD  ekt m VD ðm1Þ vD  ekt
½ Bk   B1  ½1 þ   B2  f1  ½  ½ g
k¼1
g  Vth 1 V0 V0
vD  ekt
 B3  ½1 þ   B4
ðiÞ Vex  
C1 ðVD ; vD ; ::::Þ ¼
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ V  ½ V g vD ekt P
3
½ gV  1 þ B3  e½ Vex  þ B4 Þ  ½ Bk 
0 0
ðB1  e th þ B2  e
k¼1

  ðiÞ
kt m
 ½ VD0 ðm1Þ  ½vDVe0   B3  vDVeex  B4
kt kt
D e V
B1 vgV þ B 2 
ðiÞ
th 1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼  
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
v e kt f ½ V  ½ V g vD ekt P 3
½D
gVth  1 þ B3  e½ Vex  þ B4 Þ  ½ Bk 
0 0
ðB1  e þ B2  e
k¼1

  ðiÞ
vD  ekt m VD ðm1Þ vD  ekt
 B1 þ B2  ½  ½ 
g  Vth 1 V0 V0
vD  ekt
 B3   B4
ðiÞ Vex
C1 ðVD ; vD ; ::::Þ ¼  
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½ gV 
þ B3  e½ Vex 
0
ðB1  e th þ B2  e 1 Þ
X
3 X
3
½ Bk  þ B4  ½ Bk 
k¼1 k¼1

 
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½ gVth  1 þ B3  e½ Vex 
0
We define: X4 ðvD Þ ¼ B1  e þ B2  e
  ðiÞ
m
 ½ VD0 ðm1Þ  ½vDVe0   B3  vDVeex  B4
kt kt kt
D e V
B1 vgV þ B2 
ðiÞ
th 1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
P
3 P
3
X4 ðvD Þ  ½ Bk  þ B4  ½ Bk 
k¼1 k¼1
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 237

ðiÞ   ðiÞ ðiÞ


vD  ekt 1 ½VDVVV  ½vDVekt  m VD ðm1Þ vD  ekt 1 ½VVD m
B4 ¼   e ex  e ex  m  ½  ½  e 0
Vex  RV 1 V0 V0 R0
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
f ½ V  ½ V g
e 1 0 0

We define the following variables: X1 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼ X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼ vD


D D

vD ekt vD  ekt v2  e2kt


X1 ðvD Þ ¼ vD  e½ Vex 
’; vD  ð1 þ Þ ¼ vD þ D 2 jv2 0 ¼ vD
Vex Vex D
 
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt  
f ½ VD  ½ DV g ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt
 ½ D ðm1Þ  ½
0 0
X2 ðvD Þ ¼ vD  e 1 ¼ vD  ð1  Þ
1 V0 V0
  ðiÞ
m V v2  ekt
¼ vD   ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ D 
1 V0 V0
 
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
f ½ VD  ½ D
V0 g
0
X2 ðvD Þ ¼ vD  e 1 jv2 0 ¼ vD
D

ðiÞ   ðiÞ ðiÞ


ekt 1 ½VDVVV  VD ðm1Þ ekt 1 ½VVD m
m
B4 ¼   e ex  X1 ðvD Þ  m    ½    e 0  X2 ðvD Þ

Vex RV 1 V0 V0 R0
ðiÞ
V VV
 
1 m
 e½ Vex   m 
D
B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD ¼f
v 0
D D Vex  RV 1
ðiÞ V
ðiÞ
VD ðm1Þ 1 ½ D m
½    e V0 g  vD  ekt
V0 V0  R0

V VV
ðiÞ   ðiÞ
ðiÞ 1 m V 1
 e½ Vex   m   ½ D ðm1Þ 
D
X3 ðVD Þ ¼
Vex  RV 1 V0 V0  R0
ðiÞ
V
½ VD m
e 0 ; B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD
v 0
D D
ðiÞ kt
¼ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  e
 
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
v ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½D
gVth  1 þ B 3  e½Vex 
0
X4 ðvD Þ ¼ B1  e þ B2  e
  ðiÞ
vD  ekt m VD ðm1Þ vD  ekt
X4 ðvD Þ ¼ B1  ½1 þ  þ B2  f1  ½  ½ g þ B3
g  Vth 1 V0 V0
vD  ekt
 ½1 þ 
Vex
238 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

X   ðiÞ
3
vD  ekt m V vD  ekt vD  ekt
X4 ðvD Þ ¼ ½ Bi  þ B1   B2   ½ D ðm1Þ  ½  þ B3 
i¼1
g  Vth 1 V0 V0 Vex

X 3   ðiÞ
B1 m V 1 B3
X4 ðvD Þ ¼ ½ Bi  þ f  B2   ½ D ðm1Þ  ½  þ g  vD  ekt
i¼1
g  V th 1 V 0 V 0 V ex

  ðiÞ
ðiÞ m
 ½ VD0 ðm1Þ  ½V10  þ
V
We define: X5 ðVD Þ ¼ B1
gVth  B2  B3
Vex
1

X
3
ðiÞ
X4 ðvD Þ ¼ ½ Bi  þ X5 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
i¼1
 
m ðiÞ
ðiÞ
 ½ VD0 ðm1Þ  ½vDVe0   B3  vDVeex  X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
kt kt kt
D e V
B1 vgV þ B2 
ðiÞ
th
1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
P
3
ðiÞ P
3
ðiÞ P
3
f½ Bi  þ X5 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt g  ½ Bk  þ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt  ½ Bk 
i¼1 k¼1 k¼1


 ðiÞ
m ðiÞ
 ½ VD0 ðm1Þ  V10  B3  V1ex  X3 ðVD Þg  vD  ekt
V
fB1 gV1 th þ B2 
ðiÞ 1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
P
3 P3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bi 2 þ ½ Bk   fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg  vD  ekt
i¼1 k¼1

For simplicity we define the following global parameters:


  ðiÞ
ðiÞ 1 m V 1 1 ðiÞ
X6 ðVD Þ ¼ B1 þ B2   ½ D ðm1Þ   B3   X3 ðVD Þ
g  Vth 1 V0 V0 Vex
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X7 ðVD Þ ¼ X5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þ; C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
ðiÞ
X6 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
¼ 3
P P3
ðiÞ
½ Bi 2 þ ½ Bk   X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
i¼1 k¼1

ðiÞ
ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
P
3 P3
ðiÞ
½ Bk   f½ Bk  þ X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt g
k¼1 k¼1
P
3
ðiÞ
f½ Bk   X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt g
k¼1

P3
ðiÞ
f½ Bk   X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt g
k¼1
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 239

P
3
ðiÞ Q
7
ðiÞ
½ Bk   X6 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt  ½ Xi ðVD Þ  v2D  e2kt
ðiÞ k¼1 i¼6
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
P
3 P
3
ðiÞ
½ Bk   f½ Bk 2  X27  ðVD Þ  v2D  e2kt g
k¼1 k¼1

We consider v2D ! e  0

ðiÞ
ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ 1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þjv2 !e0 ¼  vD  ekt ;
D P
3 ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ
½ Bk 2
k¼1
ðiÞ
1 X6 ðVD Þ
¼ þ  vD  ekt
wðVD Þ
ðiÞ P
3
½ Bk 2
k¼1

We can summery our system global parameters in the below Table 2.15:

Table 2.15 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a microwave oscillator system global parameters
Global parameter Expression
ðiÞ ðiÞ
B1 ðVD Þ ½V 
½ D 1
gVth
Is  1
gVth e
ðiÞ ðiÞ
B2 ðVD Þ V
ðiÞ V
½ VD m
ð1  m  ½ VD0 m Þ  R10  e 0

ðiÞ ðiÞ
B3 ðVD Þ VD
ðiÞ V VV
½ DVex 
ð1 þ Vex Þ  R1V  e
B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ðiÞ
V VV
  ðiÞ V
ðiÞ
¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD m ½ VD m
fVex1RV  e½ Vex   ½ VD0 ðm1Þ  V01R0  e
V
g  vD  ekt
D
v 0
D D m 0
1
ðiÞ
B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD ¼ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
v 0
D D

X1 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼ X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 vD


D D
ðiÞ ðiÞ  ðiÞ  ðiÞ
X3 ðVD Þ V VV
m V
½ D m
 e½ Vex   ½ VD0 ðm1Þ  V01R0  e V0
D V
1
Vex RV m
1
  ðiÞ
X4 ðvD Þ P3 m
 ½ VD0 ðm1Þ  ½V10  þ VBex3 g  vD  ekt
V
½ Bi  þ fgV B1
 B2 
i¼1
th 1
ðiÞ
  ðiÞ
X5 ðVD Þ B1
 B 
m
 ½ VD0 ðm1Þ  ½V10  þ VBex3
V
gVth 2
1
ðiÞ
  ðiÞ
X6 ðVD Þ B1 gV1 th þ B2 
m
 ½ VD0 ðm1Þ  V10  B3  V1ex  X3 ðVD Þ
V ðiÞ
1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X7 ðVD Þ X5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þ
240 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ w1 ðVD Þ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ ¼ ðiÞ þ C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ. We need to find C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ wðVD Þ
function
ðiÞ
þ vD ekt ðiÞ
1 ½ð
V
D Þ1 VD þ vD  ekt m
Is  2
e gVth
 f1 þ m  ð1  ½  Þg
ðg  Vth Þ V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ vD ekt m
VD þ vD  ekt m1 m V
½ð D Þ 
ð Þ  e V0
V0 R0  V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD þ vD  ekt 1 V þ vD ekt VV
 e½ 
D
ðiÞ þ f2 þ g Vex
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ Vex V  R
ðiÞ
¼   ex V
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ f
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
½ V  ½ V g
vD ekt vD ekt
½ gV  1 þ B3  e½ Vex  þ B4 g
0 0
fB1  e th þ B2  e

Under the Taylor series high order elements tend to zero (. . .  vkD ! e 8 k
2)
ðiÞ
assumption for exponent functions: B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD ¼ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
v 0
D D

ðiÞ
1 V vD ekt
½gVD 1 ½ gVth 
Is  2
e th e
ðg  Vth Þ
ðiÞ
VD þ vD  ekt m
 f1 þ m  ð1  ½  Þg
V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ vD ekt m
V þ vD  ekt m1 m V
½ð D Þ 
ð D Þ  e V0
V0 R0  V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD vD  ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
 e½ Vex   e½ Vex 
D
ðiÞ þ fð2 þ Þþ g
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ Vex Vex V R
ðiÞ
¼  ex  V
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
v ekt f ½ VD  ½ DV g
½D  1 0 0
fB1  e gVth
þ B2  e
vD ekt
ðiÞ
þ B3  e½ Vex  þ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt g

ðiÞ m ðiÞ   ðiÞ


V þ vD  ekt V VD ðm1Þ vD  ekt
m
½ D   ½ D m þ  ½ ½
V0 V0 V0 1 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ   ðiÞ
VD þ vD  ekt m1 VD m1 m1 V vD  ekt
ð Þ ½  þ  ½ D ðm2Þ  ½ 
V0 V0 1 V0 V0
   
V
ðiÞ m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
ðiÞ m
½½ VD   ½ VD  ½  ðiÞ  ½ VD  ½
V þ vD ekt m V0 
D
V0 V
½ð D Þ  0
1 0 ½ VD m 1 0
e V0
e ¼e 0 e
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 241

V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
ðiÞ
1 ½ D 1 ½ gVth 
VD m
Is  2
 e gVth e  f1 þ m  ð1  ½ 
ðg  Vth Þ V0
  ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt
  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ Þg
1 V0 V0
ðiÞ   ðiÞ
V m1 V
 f½ D m1 þ  ½ D ðm2Þ
V0 1 V0
 
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ  ½ VD  ½ DV 
kt
vD  e m V
½ 
D m
1 0 0
½ g   e V0  e
V0 R0  V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V 1 V VV vD ekt
 e½ Vex   e½ Vex 
D
þ ð2 þ D Þ 
Vex Vex  RV
ðiÞ
vD  ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
 e½ Vex   e½ Vex 
D
ðiÞ þ 
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ Vex Vex  RV
ðiÞ
¼  
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD  ½ V0 g
½ gVth  1 0
fB1  e þ B2  e
v ekt
½ DVex  ðiÞ
þ B3  e þ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt g
 
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g
½ gVth  1 0
We already define: X4 ðvD Þ ¼ B1  e þ B2  e þ
vD ekt
½ Vex 
B3  e
P ðiÞ
And X4 ðvD Þ ¼ ½ 3i¼1 Bi  þ X5 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
 
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
v ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½D
gVth  1 ðiÞ
þ B 3  e½ Vex  þ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
0
B1  e þ B2  e
ðiÞ
¼ X4 ðvD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt

ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X4 ðvD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt ¼ ½ Bi  þ X5 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt þ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
i¼1
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼½ Bi  þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg  vD  ekt
i¼1
242 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
ðiÞ
1 ½ D 1 ½ gVth 
VD m
Is  2
 e gVth e  f1 þ m  ð1  ½ 
ðg  Vth Þ V0
!
ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt
  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ Þg
1 V0 V0
ðiÞ   ðiÞ
VD m1 m1 V
 f½  þ  ½ D ðm2Þ
V0 1 V0
 
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ
kt  ½ VD  ½ DV 
vD  e m V
½ 
D m
1 0 0
½ g   e V0  e
V0 R0  V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD 1 V VV vD ekt
 e½ Vex   e½ Vex 
D
þ ð2 þ Þ
Vex Vex  RV
ðiÞ
vD  ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
 e½ Vex   e½ Vex 
D
ðiÞ þ 
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ Vex Vex  RV
¼
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ P3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bi  þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg  vD  ekt
i¼1

We need to get an expression of the above equation’s numerator.


V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
ðiÞ
ðiÞ 1 ½ D 1 ½ gVth 
VD m
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ ¼ Is  2
 e gVth e  f1 þ m  ð1  ½ 
ðg  Vth Þ V0
!
ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt
  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ Þg
1 V0 V0
ðiÞ   ðiÞ
VD m1 m1 V vD  ekt
 f½  þ  ½ D ðm2Þ  ½ g
V0 1 V0 V0
 
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
V
ðiÞ  ½ VD  ½ DV  ðiÞ
m ½ VD m 1 0 0 V
 e 0 e þ ð2 þ D Þ
R0  V0 Vex
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 V VV vD ekt vD  ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
 e½ Vex   e½ Vex  þ  e½ Vex   e½ Vex 
D D
 
Vex  RV Vex Vex  RV
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 243

V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
ðiÞ
ðiÞ 1 ½ D 1 ½ VD m
gVth 
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ ¼ Is  2
 e gVth e  Þ  f1 þ m  ð1  ½
ðg  Vth Þ V0
!  
ðiÞ ðiÞ
m V vD  ekt V m1
m  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ g  f½ D m1 þ
1 V0 V0 V0 1
ðiÞ
VD ðm2Þ vD  ekt
½  ½ g
V0 V0
 
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
V
ðiÞ  ½ VD  ½ DV  ðiÞ
m ½ VD m 1 0 0 V
 e 0 e þ ð2 þ D Þ
R0  V0 Vex
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 V VV vD ekt vD  ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
 e½ Vex   e½ Vex  þ  e½ Vex   e½ Vex 
D D
 
Vex  RV Vex Vex  RV

First we take the internal expression’s multiplication:

ðiÞ   ðiÞ ðiÞ


VD m m V vD  ekt V
f½1 þ m  ð1  ½  Þ  m   ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ g  f½ D m1
V0 1 V0 V0 V0
  ðiÞ kt ðiÞ ðiÞ
m1 V vD  e V V
þ  ½ D ðm2Þ  ½ g ¼ ½1 þ m  ð1  ½ D m Þ  ½ D m1
1 V0 V0 V0 V0
ðiÞ   ðiÞ
V m1 V vD  ekt
þ ½1 þ m  ð1  ½ D m Þ   ½ D ðm2Þ  ½ 
V0 1 V0 V0
ðiÞ   ðiÞ    
V m V vD  ekt m m1
 ½ D m1  m   ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ m 
V0 1 V0 V0 1 1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD ðm1Þ VD ðm2Þ v2D  e2kt
½  ½  ½ 
V0 V0 V02

We consider . . .v2D ! e ¼ 0 then


    ðiÞ ðiÞ
m m1 V V v2  e2kt
m   ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ D ðm2Þ  ½ D 2  ! e
1 1 V0 V0 V0

ðiÞ   ðiÞ ðiÞ


VD m m V vD  ekt V
f½1 þ m  ð1  ½  Þ  m   ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ g  f½ D m1
V0 1 V0 V0 V0
  ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
m1 V vD  ekt V V
þ  ½ D ðm2Þ  ½ g ¼ ½1 þ m  ð1  ½ D m Þ  ½ D m1
1 V0 V0 V0 V0
ðiÞ   ðiÞ
V m1 V vD  ekt
þ ½1 þ m  ð1  ½ D m Þ   ½ D ðm2Þ  ½ 
V0 1 V0 V0
ðiÞ   ðiÞ
VD m1 m V vD  ekt
½  m  ½ D ðm1Þ  ½   ðe ! 0Þ
V0 1 V0 V0
244 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ   ðiÞ


V V V m1 VD ðm2Þ
½1 þ m  ð1  ½ D m Þ  ½ D m1 þ f½1 þ m  ð1  ½ D m Þ  ½ 
V0 V0 V0 1 V0
ðiÞ   ðiÞ
V m V vD  ekt
 ½ D m1  m   ½ D ðm1Þ g  ½ 
V0 1 V0 V0

ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ V V
N1 ðVD Þ ¼ ½1 þ m  ð1  ½ D m Þ  ½ D m1 ;
V0 V0
ðiÞ   ðiÞ
ðiÞ VD m m1 V
N2 ðVD Þ ¼ ½1 þ m  ð1  ½  Þ   ½ D ðm2Þ
V0 1 V0
ðiÞ   ðiÞ
V m V ðiÞ ðiÞ vD  ekt
 ½ D m1  m   ½ D ðm1Þ ) N1 ðVD Þ þ N2 ðVD Þ  ½ ;
V0 1 V0 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
N1 ¼ N1 ðVD Þ; N2 ¼ N2 ðVD Þ

ðiÞ
ðiÞ kt 1 V
½gVD 1 ½
vD ekt
gVth 
vD  ekt
w1 ðVD þ vD  e Þ ¼ Is  2
e th e  fN1 þ N2  ½ g
ðg  Vth Þ V0
 
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
V
ðiÞ  ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 
ðiÞ
m ½ VD m 1 0 VD
 e 0 e þ ð2 þ Þ
R0  V0 Vex
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 V VV vD ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
 e½ Vex   e½ Vex  þ 2  e½ Vex   e½ Vex   vD  ekt
D D

Vex  RV Vex  RV

ðiÞ
V
½ D 1
We define for simplicity the following parameters: N3 ¼ Is  ðgV1 Þ2
 e gVth
th

V
ðiÞ
V VV ðiÞ V VV
ðiÞ ðiÞ
m ½ D m V 1 1
 e½ Vex  ; N6 ¼ 2  e½ Vex 
D D
N4 ¼  e V0 ; N5 ¼ ð2 þ D Þ 
R0  V0 Vex Vex  RV Vex  RV

 
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
 ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 
ðiÞ kt
v ekt
½D
gVth 
vD  ekt 1 0
w1 ðVD þ vD  e Þ ¼ N3  e  fN1 þ N2  ½ g  N4  e
V0
vD ekt vD ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ N5  e ½ Vex  þ N6  e ½ Vex   vD  ekt ; N3 ¼ N3 ðVD Þ; N4 ¼ N4 ðVD Þ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
N5 ¼ N5 ðVD Þ; N6 ¼ N6 ðVD Þ
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 245

Under the Taylor series high order elements tend to zero (. . .  vkD ! e 8 k
2)
vD ekt vD ekt
½ gVth  vD ekt vD ekt
assumption for exponent functions: e  1þ gVth ; e½Vex  ¼ 1þ Vex

 
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
!
 ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ ðiÞ
V0  m VD ðm1Þ vD  ekt
e 1 0
1 ½  ½ 
1 V0 V0
 
ðiÞ vD  ekt vD  ekt m
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ ¼ N3  ½1 þ   fN1 þ N2  ½ g  N4  f1 
g  Vth V0 1
ðiÞ
VD ðm1Þ vD  ekt vD  ekt vD  ekt
½  ½ g þ N5  ½1 þ  þ N6  ½1 þ   vD  ekt
V0 V0 Vex Vex

 
ðiÞ kt vD  ekt m
w1 ðVD þ vD  e Þ ¼ N 3 þ N 3   fN4  N1 þ N4  ðN2  N1 
g  Vth 1
ðiÞ kt
  ðiÞ
V vD  e m V v2  e2kt
 ½ D ðm1Þ Þ   N4  N2   ½ D ðm1Þ  ½ D 2 g
V0 V0 1 V0 V0
vD  ekt v2  e2kt
þ N5 þ N5  þ N6  vD  ekt þ N6  D
Vex Vex

All expressions which includes v2D tend to zero (v2D ! e).


 
ðiÞ vD  ekt m
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ ¼ N3 þ N3   N4  N1  N4  ðN2  N1 
g  Vth 1
ðiÞ
V vD  ekt vD  ekt
 ½ D ðm1Þ Þ  þ N5 þ N5  þ N6  vD  ekt
V0 V0 Vex
 
ðiÞ kt 1 m
w1 ðVD þ vD  e Þ ¼ fN5 þ N3  N4  N1 g þ fN3   ðN2  N1 
g  Vth 1
ðiÞ
VD ðm1Þ N4 N5
½  Þ þ þ N6 g  vD  ekt ;
V0 V0 Vex
ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ ¼ U1 þ U2  vD  ekt

ðiÞ ðiÞ
We define: U1 ¼ N5 þ N3  N4  N1 ; U1 ¼ U1 ðVD Þ; U2 ¼ U2 ðVD Þ
!
ðiÞ
1 m VD ðm1Þ N4 N5
U2 ¼ N3   ðN2  N1  ½  Þ þ þ N6
g  Vth 1 V0 V0 Vex
246 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ U1 þ U2  vD  ekt
¼
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ P
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bi  þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg  vD  ekt
i¼1

ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ w1 ðVD Þ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
þ C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ) C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ wðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ w1 ðVD Þ
¼ ðiÞ
 ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ wðVD Þ
ðiÞ
ðiÞ U1 þ U2  vD  ekt w1 ðVD Þ
C2 ðVD ; vD ; ::::Þ ¼ 
P
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ wðVD Þ
ðiÞ
½ Bi  þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg  vD  ekt
i¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
U1  wðVD Þ þ U2  wðVD Þ  vD  ekt  w1 ðVD Þ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 ð½ Bi  þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD ÞgÞ  vD  ekt
i¼1
¼
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bi   wðVD Þ þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg
i¼1
ðiÞ
 wðVD Þ  vD  ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
U1  wðVD Þ þ fU2  wðVD Þ  w1 ðVD Þ
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
ð½ Bi  þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD ÞgÞg  vD  ekt
ðiÞ i¼1
C2 ðVD ; vD ; ::::Þ ¼
P
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bi   wðVD Þ þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg  wðVD Þ  vD  ekt
i¼1

ðiÞ
We define for simplicity the following global parameters: U3 ¼ U1  wðVD Þ

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
U4 ¼ U2  wðVD Þ  w1 ðVD Þ  ð½ Bi  þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD ÞgÞ;
i¼1
X
3
ðiÞ
U5 ¼ ½ Bi   wðVD Þ
i¼1

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ U3 þ U4  vD  ekt


U6 ¼ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg  wðVD Þ; C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
U5 þ U6  vD  ekt
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 247

ðiÞ U3 þ U4  vD  ekt U5  U6  vD  ekt


C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼ 
U5 þ U6  vD  ekt U5  U6  vD  ekt
U3  U5  U3  U6  vD  ekt þ U5  U4  vD  ekt  U4  U6  v2D  e2kt
¼
U25  U26  v2D  e2kt

All expressions which includes v2D tend to zero (v2D ! e).

ðiÞ U3  U5 þ ðU5  U4  U3  U6 Þ  vD  ekt


C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
U25
U3 ðU5  U4  U3  U6 Þ
¼ þ  vD  ekt
U5 U25

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


U3 ¼ U3 ðVD Þ; U4 ¼ U4 ðVD Þ; U5 ¼ U5 ðVD Þ; U6 ¼ U6 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ w1 ðVD Þ U3 ðU5  U4  U3  U6 Þ
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
þ þ  vD  ekt
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ wðVD Þ U5 U25

We can summery our last analysis in the next Table 2.16):

Table 2.16 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a microwave oscillator system expressions and equivalent
expressions
Expression Equivalent expression
1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðVD Þ ðiÞ X ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ
1
ðiÞ þ P
6
3  vD  ekt ; C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þjv2 !e0 ¼ P
6
3  vD  ekt
wðVD Þ 2 D
½ Bk  ½ Bk 2
k¼1 k¼1
ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ ðiÞ
þ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ
þ ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
 vD  ekt
ðiÞ
ðiÞ U3 ðVD Þ
C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þjv2 !e0 ¼ ðiÞ
D
U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ
þ ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
kt
 vD  e
248 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

1 1
x  k  ekt ¼ ðRb þ ðiÞ
Þ  ½X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ 
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ Lb
ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD  ekt Þ
 ðiÞ
 ½X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ 2  ½Y ðiÞ þ y  ekðts2 Þ 
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ
1
 ðiÞ
Lb  wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ
ðiÞ
1 X6 ðVD Þ 1
x  k  ekt ¼ ðRb þ f þ  vD  ekt gÞ   ½X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ 
wðVD Þ
ðiÞ P
3 Lb
½ Bk 2
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
 f 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ
þ ðiÞ
 vD  ekt g
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ kðts1 Þ 2 ðiÞ kðts2 Þ
 ½X þx  e   ½Y þy  e 
ðiÞ
1 1 X6 ðV Þ
 f þ 3 D  vD  ekt g
Lb wðV ðiÞ Þ P
D ½ Bk 2
k¼1

½X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ 2 ¼ ½X ðiÞ 2 þ 2  X ðiÞ  x  ekðts1 Þ þ x2  e2kðts1 Þ jx2 0


¼ ½X ðiÞ 2 þ 2  X ðiÞ  x  ekðts1 Þ

ðiÞ
1 X6 ðVD Þ 1
x  k  ekt ¼ ðRb þ f þ  vD  ekt gÞ   ½X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ 
wðVD Þ
ðiÞ P
3 Lb
½ Bk 2
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
 f 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ
þ ðiÞ
 vD  ekt g
U25 ðVD Þ
1
 f½X ðiÞ 2 þ 2  X ðiÞ  x  ekðts1 Þ g  ½Y ðiÞ þ y  ekðts2 Þ  
Lb
ðiÞ
1 X6 ðVD Þ
f þ  vD  ekt g
wðVD Þ
ðiÞ P
3
2
½ Bk 
k¼1
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 249

1 1 1 1
x  k  ekt ¼ ½Rb þ ðiÞ
   X ðiÞ  ½Rb þ ðiÞ
   x  ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ X6 ðVD Þ
  3  vD  ekt  3  vD  x  ekðts1 Þ  ekt
Lb P 2 P 2
½ Bk  ½ Bk   Lb
k¼1 k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
 ½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
  ½X ðiÞ 2  ½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
  2  X ðiÞ  x  ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2
 ðiÞ
 vD  ekt
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ  2  X ðiÞ
 ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ 1 Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
 vD  x  ekðts1 Þ  ekt      vD  ekt
Lb wðV ðiÞ Þ Lb P 3
2
D ½ Bk 
k¼1
ðiÞ
1 1 X6 ðV Þ
  y  ekðts2 Þ   3 D  vD  y  ekðts2 Þ  ekt
Lb  wðVD Þ
ðiÞ L b P
½ Bk  2
k¼1

We consider vD  x  0; vD  y  0

1 1 1 1
x  k  ekt ¼ ½Rb þ ðiÞ
   X ðiÞ  ½Rb þ ðiÞ
   x  ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
  3  vD  ekt  ½ 1 ðiÞ þ   ½X ðiÞ 2
Lb P 2 wðV Þ U ðV
ðiÞ
Þ
½ Bk  D 5 D
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
 ½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
  2  X ðiÞ  x  ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2
 ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ 1 Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ 1
 vD  ekt      vD  ekt   y  ekðts2 Þ
Lb wðV ðiÞ Þ Lb P 3
2 Lb  wðVD Þ
ðiÞ
D ½ Bk 
k¼1
250 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

ðiÞ
11 w ðVD Þ Y ðiÞ 1
x  k  ekt ¼ ½Rb þ ðiÞ
 X ðiÞ  1 ðiÞ
  ½X ðiÞ 2  
wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb wðV ðiÞ Þ
D
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 1 X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
 ½Rb þ   x  ekðts1 Þ   3  vD  ekt   ½X ðiÞ 2
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ Lb Lb P ðiÞ
U5 ðVD Þ
½ B k 2
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
½ ðiÞ
þ ðiÞ
  2  X ðiÞ  x  ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2
 ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ 1
 vD  ekt   3  vD  ekt   y  ekðts2 Þ
Lb P 2 L  wðV
ðiÞ
Þ
½ Bk  b D
k¼1

ðiÞ
w1 ðVD Þ
At fixed point: ðRb þ 1
ðiÞ Þ  L1b  X ðiÞ  ðiÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2  Y ðiÞ  1
ðiÞ ¼0
wðVD Þ wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ

ðiÞ
1 1 X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
x  k  ekt ¼ ½Rb þ  x  ekðts1 Þ 
  3  vD  ekt
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ Lb Lb P 2
½ Bk 
k¼1
ðiÞ
U3 ðVD Þ 1
 ðiÞ
 ½X ðiÞ 2  ðiÞ
 y  ekðts2 Þ
U5 ðVD Þ Lb  wðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
 ½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
  2  X ðiÞ  x  ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2
 ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
 vD  ekt   3  vD  ekt
Lb P
½ Bk 2
k¼1

ðiÞ
U3 ðVD Þ
We need to choose the right parameters which give ðiÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2 ¼ 0 since
U5 ðVD Þ
there is no ekt multiplication term. We already approve our fixed points are
ðiÞ
U3 ðVD Þ
E  ðX  ; Y  ; VD ; VA Þ ¼ ð0; 0; VD ; 0Þ. X ðiÞ ¼ 0 ) ðiÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2 ¼ 0
U5 ðVD Þ
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 251

ðiÞ
1 1 X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
x  k  ekt ¼ ½Rb þ  x  ekt  eks1 
  3  vD  ekt
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ Lb Lb P 2
½ B k
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 w1 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
 ðiÞ
 y  ekt  eks2  ½ ðiÞ
þ ðiÞ
  2  X ðiÞ  x  ekt  eks1
Lb  wðVD Þ wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2
 ðiÞ
 vD  ekt
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
  3  vD  ekt
Lb P 2
½ Bk 
k¼1

Dividing two side of above equation by ekt gives:


ðiÞ
1
1 X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ 1
x  k ¼ ½Rb þ  x  eks1 
  3  vD   y  eks2
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ Lb Lb P 2 L  wðV
ðiÞ
Þ
½ B b D
k
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
 ½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
  2  X ðiÞ  x  eks1
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2
 ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
 vD   3  vD
Lb P
½ Bk 2
k¼1

ðiÞ ðiÞ
1
1 w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
fk  ð½Rb þ ðiÞ
 þ ½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
  2  X ðiÞ Þ  eks1 g  x
wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
1 X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
  eks2  y  f  3
Lb  wðVD Þ
ðiÞ Lb P
½ B k 2
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2
þ ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
þ  3 g  vD ¼ 0
Lb P
½ B k 2
k¼1
252 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

We define for simplicity the following global parameters:


ðiÞ ðiÞ
P1 ¼ P1 ðVD ; X ; . . .Þ

ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 1 w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
P1 ¼ ½Rb þ ðiÞ
þ ½ 1 ðiÞ
 þ ðiÞ
  2  X ðiÞ ; P2
wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
¼ P2 ðVD ; X ðiÞ ; Y ðiÞ ; . . .Þ

ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
P2 ¼  3
Lb P
½ B k 2
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ  U4 ðVD Þ  U3 ðVD Þ  U6 ðVD ÞÞ  ½X ðiÞ 2
þ ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
þ  3
Lb P
½ B k 2
k¼1

1
fk  P1  eks1 g  x  ðiÞ
 eks2  y  P2  vD ¼ 0
Lb  wðVD Þ

wðVD Þ
Second TD’s system differential equation: dY dt ¼ C  X  RL C  Y  LC  VA and
1 1

adding to it’s coordinates ½X Y VD VA  arbitrarily small increments of exponential


form ½x y vD vA   ekt and retaining the first order terms in x y vD vA .
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ 1
y  k  ekt ¼  ½X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ    ½Y ðiÞ þ y  ekðts2 Þ 
C RL  C
1 ðiÞ
  ½VA þ vA  ekt 
LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ ¼ wðVD Þ þ C3 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
) C3 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼ wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ  wðVD Þ

ðiÞ
We already approve B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD ¼ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
v 0
D D
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 253

 
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
ðiÞ ½ gVth 
þ vD  ekt Þ ¼ B1  e þ B 3  e½ Vex 
0
wðVD þ B2  e 1 þ B4
 
m V
ðiÞ
v ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ DV g vD ekt
ðiÞ ½ gVth 
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ ¼ B1  e þ B 3  e½ Vex 
0 0
þ B2  e 1
ðiÞ
þ X3 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ ¼ ½ Bk  þ X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
k¼1

ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
C3 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼ ½ Bk  þ X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt  wðVD Þ
k¼1
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ f½ Bk   wðVD Þg þ X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
k¼1

ðiÞ
X
3
ðiÞ 1 ½ D 1
gV
½V
V

1 ½VD m
ðiÞ ðiÞ

½ Bk   wðVD Þ ¼ Is   e th þ ð1  m  ½ D m Þ   e V0
k¼1
g  Vth V0 R0
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD 1 ½VDVVV  1 V
½ð D Þ1
þ ð1 þ Þ  e ex  fIs   e gVth
Vex RV g  Vth
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD m 1 ½ðVVD Þm  V 1 ½VDVVV 
þ ð1  m  ½  Þ   e 0 þ ð1 þ D Þ   e ex g ¼ 0
V0 R0 Vex RV

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


C3 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼ X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt ) wðVD þ vD  ekt Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ wðVD Þ þ X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt

ðiÞ ðiÞ
½wðVD Þ þ X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt  1
y  k  ekt ¼  ½X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ    ½Y ðiÞ þ y
C RL  C
1 ðiÞ
 ekðts2 Þ    ½VA þ vA  ekt 
LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt 1
y  k  ekt ¼ ½ þ   ½X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ    Y ðiÞ
C C RL  C
1 1 ðiÞ 1
  y  ekðts2 Þ  V   vA  ekt
RL  C LC A LC
254 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


wðVD Þ ðiÞ wðVD Þ X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
y  k  ekt ¼ X þ  x  ekðts1 Þ þ
C C C
ðiÞ kðts1 Þ kt
X7 ðVD Þ  vD  x  e e 1
þ   Y ðiÞ
C RL  C
1 1 ðiÞ 1
  y  ekðts2 Þ   VA   vA  ekt
RL  C LC LC

We consider vD  x  0

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


wðVD Þ ðiÞ wðVD Þ X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt
y  k  ekt ¼ X þ  x  ekðts1 Þ þ
C C C
1 ðiÞ 1 kðts2 Þ 1 ðiÞ 1
 Y  ye   VA   vA  ekt
RL  C RL  C LC LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ ðiÞ 1 1 ðiÞ wðVD Þ
y  k  ekt ¼ X   Y ðiÞ  V þ  x  ekðts1 Þ
C RL  C LC A C
ðiÞ
X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt 1 1
þ   y  ekðts2 Þ   vA  ekt
C RL  C LC
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ ðiÞ
At fixed point: C  X ðiÞ  RL1C  Y ðiÞ  LC
1
 VA ¼ 0

ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ  vD  ekt 1
y  k  ekt ¼  x  ekðts1 Þ þ   y  ekðts2 Þ
C C RL  C
1
  vA  ekt
LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ 1 1
yk¼  x  eks1 þ  vD   y  eks2   vA
C C RL  C LC

ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ 1 1
 x  eks1  y  k þ  vD   y  eks2   vA ¼ 0
C C RL  C LC

ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ 1 X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ 1
 x  eks1  y  k   y  eks2 þ  vD   vA ¼ 0
C RL  C C LC

Third TD’s system differential equation: dVdtD ¼ Xðt  s1 Þ and adding to it’s
coordinates ½X Y VD VA  arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x y vD vA  
ekt and retaining the first order terms in x y vD vA [9, 10].
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 255

vD  k  ekt ¼ X ðiÞ þ x  ekðts1 Þ . At fixed point: Xðt  s1 Þjts1 ¼ XðtÞ )


ðiÞ
X ¼ 0.
vD  k  ekt ¼ x  ekt  eks1 ) x  eks1  vD  k ¼ 0. Fourth TD’s system dif-
ferential equation: dVdtA ¼ Yðt  s2 Þ and adding to it’s coordinates ½X Y VD VA 
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x y vD vA   ekt and retaining the
first order terms in x y vD vA . vA  k  ekt ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y  ekðts2 Þ . At fixed point:
Yðt  s2 Þjt [ [ s2 ¼ YðtÞ ) Y ðiÞ ¼ 0; vA  k  ekt ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y  ekðts2 Þ ) vA  k  ekt
¼ y  ekðts2 Þ vA  k  ekt ¼ y  ekðts2 Þ ) y  eks2  vA  k ¼ 0.
We summery our TD system’s four characteristic equations in the eigenvalue k
with delays:

ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
fk  P1 ðVD Þ  eks1 g  x  ðiÞ
 eks2  y  P2 ðVD Þ  vD ¼ 0
Lb  wðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ 1 X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ 1
 eks1  x  k  y   eks2  y þ  vD   vA ¼ 0
C RL  C C LC
x  eks1  k  vD ¼ 0; y  eks2  k  vA ¼ 0

The small increments Jacobian of our Gradostat system is as bellow:


0 1 0 x 1
!11 . . . !14
B . B y C
B . .. .. C
C B C ðiÞ
@ . . . AB C ¼ 0; !11 ¼ k  P1 ðVD Þ  eks1 ;
@ vD A
!41    !44 v A
1 ks2
!12 ¼  ðiÞ
e
Lb  wðVD Þ
ðiÞ
ðiÞ wðVD Þ ks1 1
!13 ¼ P2 ðVD Þ; !14 ¼ 0; !21 ¼ e ; !22 ¼ k   eks2
C RL  C
ðiÞ
X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ 1
!23 ¼ ; !24 ¼  ; !31 ¼ eks1 ; !32 ¼ 0; !33 ¼ k; !34 ¼ 0
C LC
!41 ¼ 0; !42 ¼ eks2 ; !43 ¼ 0; !44 ¼ k

0 1
!11 ... !14
B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A; det jA  k  Ij ¼ 0
!41  !44
256 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

0 ðiÞ
1
ks2 X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ
B k  RL C  e  LC
1 1
ðiÞ
C C
det jA  k  Ij ¼ ½k þ P1 ðVD Þ  eks1
  detB
@ 0 k 0 A
C

eks2 0 k
0 ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
1
wðVD Þ X X7 ðVD Þ
B C  eks1 C  LC
1
C
1
þ ðiÞ
e ks2
 detB
@ eks1 k 0 A
C
Lb  wðVD Þ
0 0 k
0 ðiÞ
1
wðVD Þ
 eks1 k  RL1C  eks2  LC
1
ðiÞ B C C
 P2 ðVD Þ  det B ks1 C
@ e 0 0 A
0 eks2 k

ðiÞ 1 1
det jA  k  Ij ¼ ½k þ P1 ðVD Þ  eks1   fðk þ  eks2 Þ  k2   eks2  kg
RL  C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 wðVD Þ ks1 2 X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ ks1
þ ðiÞ
 eks2  f e k þ e  kg
Lb  wðVD Þ C C
ðiÞ 1 1
 P2 ðVD Þ  fðk þ  eks2 Þ  eks1  k   ekðs1 þ s2 Þ g
RL  C LC

ðiÞ ðiÞ
Dðk; s1 ; s2 Þ ¼ k4 þ fk3  P1 ðVD Þ þ k2  P2 ðVD Þg  eks1
ðiÞ
1 1 1 P1 ðVD Þ 1
þ ðk3  þ k2  Þ  eks2 þ fk2   ½ þ 
RL  C LC C RL Lb
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
P
2

1 P1 ðVD Þ X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ k si


þk  ½ þ þ þ g  e i¼1
C L ðiÞ
Lb  wðVD Þ RL LC

We have three stability cases: (1) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0 (2) s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s


(3) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s.
We need to get characteristics equations for all above stability analysis cases. We
study the occurrence of any possible stability switching resulting from the increase
of value of the time delay s for the general characteristic equation Dðk; sÞ. If we
choose parameter then Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n [ m:

X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ  kk ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ p1 ðsÞ  k þ p2 ðsÞ  k2 þ p3 ðsÞ  k3 þ . . .
k¼0
Xm
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 þ q3 ðsÞ  k3 þ . . .
k¼0
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 257

1 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ k3  þ k2  þ fk3  P1 ðVD Þ þ k2  P2 ðVD Þ
RL  C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 P1 ðVD Þ 1 1 P1 ðVD Þ
þ k2  ½ þ þk   ½
C RL Lb C L
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ
þ þ þ g  eks
Lb 
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ RL LC

ðiÞ ðiÞ 1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ k3  P1 ðVD Þ þ k2  P2 ðVD Þ þ fk3  þ k2 
RL  C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 P1 ðVD Þ 1 1 P1 ðVD Þ
þ k2  ½ þ þk   ½
C RL Lb C L
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ
þ þ þ g  eks
Lb 
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ RL LC

ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3  ½P1 ðVD Þ þ  þ k2  ½P2 ðVD Þ þ g  eks
RL  C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 P1 ðVD Þ 1 1 P1 ðVD Þ
þ fk2  ½ þ þk   ½
C RL Lb C L
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ
þ þ þ g  e2ks
Lb 
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ RL LC

Under Taylor series approximation: eks  1  k  s. The Maclaurin series is a


Taylor series expansion of a eks function about zero (0). We get the following
general characteristic equation D(k, s) under Taylor series approximation:
eks  1  k  s. e2ks  eks  ð1  k  sÞ

ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3  ½P1 ðVD Þ þ  þ k2  ½P2 ðVD Þ þ g  eks
RL  C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 P1 ðVD Þ 1 1 P1 ðVD Þ
þ fk2  ½ þ þk   ½
C RL Lb C L
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ
þ þ þ g  ð1  k  sÞ  eks
Lb  wðVD Þ
ðiÞ RL LC
258 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

We define for simplicity the following global parameters:

ðiÞ ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ 1


B1 ðVD Þ ¼ P1 ðVD Þ þ ; B2 ðVD Þ ¼ P2 ðVD Þ þ ;
RL  C LC
ðiÞ
ðiÞ 1 P1 ðVD Þ 1
B3 ðVD Þ ¼ ½ þ 
C RL Lb
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ 1 P1 ðVD Þ X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ ðiÞ P2 ðVD Þ
B4 ðVD Þ ¼ ½ þ þ ; B5 ðVD Þ ¼
C L Lb  wðVD Þ
ðiÞ RL LC

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3  B1 ðVD Þ þ k2  B2 ðVD Þg  eks þ fk2  B3 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ k  B4 ðVD Þ þ B5 ðVD Þg  ð1  k  sÞ  eks

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3  B1 ðVD Þ þ k2  B2 ðVD Þg  eks þ fk2  B3 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ k  B4 ðVD Þ þ B5 ðVD Þg  eks  k3  B3 ðVD Þ  s  eks
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 k2  B4 ðVD Þ  s  eks  B5 ðVD Þ  k  s  eks

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s þ k2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 B4 ðVD Þ  s þ k  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þg  eks

(Table 2.17)

Table 2.17 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a microwave oscillator system Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ functions
vs s1 and s2 options
s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0 s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s
Pn ðk; sÞ k þk 
4 3 1
RL C þk 
2 1
LC
ðiÞ
k4 þ k3  P1 ðVD Þ þ k2  P2 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ

Qm ðk; sÞ k3  P1 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ 1 1
k3  þ k2  f
ðiÞ RL  C LC
ðiÞ 1 P1 ðVD Þ 1 ðiÞ
þ k2  fP2 ðVD Þ þ ½ þ g 1 P1 ðVD Þ 1
C RL Lb þ ½ þ g
ðiÞ ðiÞ C RL Lb
1 P1 ðVD Þ X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ ðiÞ
þk  ½ þ ðiÞ 1 P1 ðVD Þ
C L Lb  wðVD Þ þk  ½
C L
ðiÞ ðiÞ
P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ  X7 ðVD Þ
þ þ þ
RL LC ðiÞ
Lb  wðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ
þ þ
RL LC
n 4 4
m 3 3
Status n>m n>m
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 259

We analyze the TD’s system stability for the third case s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s.

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s þ k2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 B4 ðVD Þ  s þ k  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s
ðiÞ
þ B5 ðVD Þg  eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 3; n [ m

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k4 ; Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ k3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s þ k2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 B4 ðVD Þ  s þ k  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þ

ðiÞ
p0 ðsÞ ¼ p1 ðsÞ ¼ p2 ðsÞ ¼ p3 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p4 ðsÞ ¼ 1; q0 ðsÞ ¼ B5 ðVD Þ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
q1 ðsÞ ¼ B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
q2 ðsÞ ¼ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s; q3 ðsÞ ¼ B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s
k¼2

The homogeneous system for X Y VD VA leads to a characteristic equation for the


P
4
eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0; Pðk; sÞ ¼ aj  k j
j¼0
P
3
Qðk; sÞ ¼ cj  k j And the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on
j¼0
qi ; qk and delay s. qi ; qk are any TD’s parameters, other parameters kept as a
ðiÞ
constant a0 ðsÞ ¼ a1 ðsÞ ¼ a2 ðsÞ ¼ a3 ðsÞ ¼ 0; a4 ðsÞ ¼ 1; c0 ðsÞ ¼ B5 ðVD Þ

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
c1 ðsÞ ¼ B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s; c2 ðsÞ ¼ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s; c3 ðsÞ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e. k = 0 is not a of PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0.
Furthermore, P(k), Q(k) are analytic functions of k, for which the following
requirements of the analysis [BK] can also be verified in the present case:
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R, then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek
0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
260 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of F(x) = 0 is continuous and differentiable
respect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That
is for any real number x; pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0.
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x4

X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ i  fx  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  x3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ i  fx  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  x 
3
½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg 6¼ 0

X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 ; jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ fx2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þg2
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ fx  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  x3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg2

X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
fx2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þg2 ¼ x4  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s2
k¼2 k¼2

ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ ½B5 ðVD Þ2  2  x2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s  B5 ðVD Þ
k¼2

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


fx  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  x3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg2 ¼ x2  ½B4 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 B5 ðVD Þ  s2 þ x6  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s2  2  x4  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x6  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s2 þ x4  f½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s2
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
2 ½B4 ðVD Þ
 B5 ðVD Þ
 s  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X 3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ x2  f½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s2  2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ 2
 B5 ðVD Þg þ ½B5 ðVD Þ
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 261

ðiÞ ðiÞ
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8  x6  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s2
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 x4  f½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s2  2  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg  x2  f½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s2
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
2½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s  B5 ðVD Þg  ½B5 ðVD Þ2
k¼2

We define the following parameters for simplicity:

ðiÞ
H0 ¼ ½B5 ðVD Þ2 ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
H2 ¼ f½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s2  2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s  B5 ðVD Þg
k¼2
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
H4 ¼ f½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s2  2  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg

ðiÞ ðiÞ P
4
H6 ¼ ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s2 ; H8 ¼ 1. Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies H2k 
k¼0
x2k ¼ 0.
And its roots are given by solving the above polynomial. Furthermore

PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4 ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ 0;
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  x3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s

Hence sin hðsÞ ¼ PR ðix;sÞQI ðix;sÞ þ PI ðix;sÞQR ðix;sÞ


jQðix;sÞj2
and cos hðsÞ ¼ 
PR ðix;sÞQR ðix;sÞ þ PI ðix;sÞQI ðix;sÞ
jQðix;sÞj2
. We already approve

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s þ k2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 B4 ðVD Þ  s þ k  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s
ðiÞ
þ B5 ðVD Þg  eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 3; n [ m
262 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

We use different parameters terminology from our last characteristics parameters


definition: k ! j ; pk ðsÞ ! aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 4 ; m ¼ 3 ; n [ m.
P
Additionally Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! QðkÞ then PðkÞ ¼ 4j¼0 aj  k j ;
P
QðkÞ ¼ 2j¼0 cj  k j

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Pk ¼ k4 ; Qk ¼ k3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s þ k2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þk  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þ

n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m and aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable func-


tion of s such that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0. In the following “−” denotes complex and conju-
gate. PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s. The coefficients
faj ðL; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . .Þ and cj ðL; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . .Þg 2
R depend on TD system’s L; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . values. Unless strictly
necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðL; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ;
VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . .Þ will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj,
cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct sub-
ðiÞ
stitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; B5 ðVD Þ 6¼ 0. 8 L; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ;
Vex ; m; s; . . . 2 R þ i.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root of the characteristic equation.
Furthermore PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic function of k for which the following
requirements of the analysis (see Kuang [5], Sect. 3.4) can also be verified in the
present case [4–6].
(a) If k ¼ i  x, x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0, i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
ðL; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . .Þ domain of interest.
(b) jQ(kÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Re k
0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
Indeed, in the limit

ðiÞ ðiÞ P
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
k3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s þ k2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
Q(kÞ þ k  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þ
j j¼j j
PðkÞ k4

(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2


2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 263

ðiÞ ðiÞ
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s2
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ x4  f½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s2  2  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg þ x2  f½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s2
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
2½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s  B5 ðVD Þg þ ½B5 ðVD Þ2
k¼2

Has at most a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x .


(d) Each positive root xðL; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . .Þ of F(xÞ¼ 0 is con-
tinuous and differentiable with respect to L; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . ..
This condition can only be assessed numerically.

In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have Pði  xÞ ¼


Pði  xÞ and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ thus, k ¼ i  x, x [ 0 maybe on eigenvalue of
characteristic equation. The analysis consists in identifying the roots of the char-
acteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k—plane, whereby
increasing the parameters L; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . ., Rek may, at the
crossing, change its sign from (−) to (+), i.e. from a stable focus
E  ðX  ; Y  ; VD ; VA Þ ¼ ð0; 0; VD ; 0Þ to an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature
may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with respect
to L; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . and TD’s system parameters. x 2 R þ :

@Rek
^1 ðRf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . ¼ const
@L k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðLf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; L; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . ¼ const
@C k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðCf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; L; C; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . ¼ const
@Rb k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðCc Þ ¼ ð Þ ; L; C; Rb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . ¼ const
@Lb k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðRsb Þ ¼ ð Þ ; L; C; Rb ; Lb ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . ¼ const
@RL k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; L; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; . . . ¼ const
@s k¼ix

When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, and
inserting k ¼ i  x.
264 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Into TD system’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin x  s ¼ gðxÞ ¼ ; cos x  s ¼ hðxÞ
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
¼
jQði  xÞj2

where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above sin x  s and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and
adding the sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note that FðxÞ is dependent of s. Now it is important to notice that if s 62 I (assume
that I R þ 0 is the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for s 62 I , xðsÞ is
not defined. Then for all s in I xðsÞ is satisfied that Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0). Then there are no
positive xðsÞ solutions for Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have stability switches. For
any s 2 I where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, we can define the angle
hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ PR ðixÞQI ðixÞ þ PI ðixÞQR ðixÞ
jQðixÞj2
and
cos hðsÞ ¼  PR ðixÞQR ðixÞ þ PI ðixÞQI ðixÞ
jQðixÞj2
:
And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I !
R þ 0 given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions
I ! R ; Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that is a continuous and differentiable in s.
In the following, the subscripts k; x; L; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . indicate the
corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on ^ðxÞ, remember in
kðL; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . .Þ and xðL; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . .Þ, and
keeping all parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in
reference [BK]. Differentiating TD’s system characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ 
eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and inverting the derivative, for
convenience, one calculates:
Remark: x ¼ L; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; . . .

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ

where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i  x, and bearing i Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ,
Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ; i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ and
that on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains:
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 265

@k 1 i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þ jk¼ix ¼ ð Þ
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ;


Q ¼ QR þ i  QI ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ;
Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I . When (x) can be any TD’s system parameters
L; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; . . ., and time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we
have dropped the arguments ði  x; xÞ, and where Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ
ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ; xx ¼ Fx =Fx
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ We define U and V:

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ;


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = s. We already find

PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4 ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ 0;
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  x3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
PRx ¼ 4  x3 ; PIx ¼ 0; QRx ¼ 2  x  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QIx ¼ ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  3  x  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s; PRs ¼ PIs ¼ 0
2

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


QRs ¼ x2  B4 ðVD Þ; QIs ¼ x  B5 ðVD Þ þ x3  B3 ðVD Þ
PRx  PR ¼ 4  x7 ; PIx  PI ¼ 0 ;
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
QRx  QR ¼ 2  x3  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s2
k¼2
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
2x½ Bk ðVD ÞB4 ðVD Þ  s  B5 ðVD Þ ;
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QIx  QI ¼ f½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  3  x2  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 fx  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  x3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ x  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s2  4  x3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s þ 3  x5  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  s2
266 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

PRs  PR ¼ 0; PIs  PI ¼ 0;
ðiÞ
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QRs  QR ¼ x2  B4 ðVD Þ  fx2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þg
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QIs  QI ¼ fx  B5 ðVD Þ þ x  B3 ðVD Þg
3
 fx  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 x3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg

X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
PR  PIx ¼ 0; PI  PRx ¼ 0; QR  QIx ¼ fx2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þg
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 f½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  3  x2  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


QI  QRx ¼ fx  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  x3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 f2  x  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  sg
k¼2
PR  PIs ¼ 0; PI  PRs ¼ 0;
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QR  QIs ¼ fx2  ½ Bk ðVD Þ  B4 ðVD Þ  s þ B5 ðVD Þg
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 fx  B5 ðVD Þ þ x3  B3 ðVD Þg;
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QI  QRs ¼ fx  ½B4 ðVD Þ  B5 ðVD Þ  s  x3  ½B1 ðVD Þ  B3 ðVD Þ  sg
ðiÞ
 x2  B4 ðVD Þ

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þj PR PIx ¼0 ¼ QR  QIx þ QI  QRx
PI PRx ¼0
Vjx¼s ¼ ðPR  PIs  PI  PRs Þ  ðQR  QIs  QI  QRs Þj PR PIs ¼0 ¼ QR  QIs þ QI  QRs
PI PRs ¼0
Fx¼s ¼ 2  ½ðPRs  PR þ PIs  PI Þ  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þj PRs PR ¼0 ¼ 2  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þ
PIs P¼0
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þj PRx PR ¼4x7 ¼ 2  ½4  x7  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ
PIx PI ¼0

Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0: Differentiating with respect to s and we get Fx  @x


@s þ Fs ¼ 0;
s 2 I ) @x
@s ¼  Fs
Fx

@Rek @x Fs 2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ; ¼ xs ¼  ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g
@s @s Fx Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@s k¼ix
@x U  @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  signfs  þxþ g
@s jPj2
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 267

We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcations)


TD’s system, about the equilibrium point E  ðX  ; Y  ; VD ; VA Þ ¼ ð0; 0; VD ; 0Þ as a
result of a variation of delay parameter s. The analysis consists in identifying the
roots of our system characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the
complex k-plane. Where by increasing the delay parameter s, Re k may at the
crossing, changes its sign from − to +, i.e. from a stable focus E(*) to an unstable
one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of
the partial derivatives with respect to s, ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k 1
@s Þk¼ix ^ ðsÞ ¼
ð@ RekÞ
@s k¼ix; L; C; R ; L ; R ; V ; V ; m; . . . ¼ const ; x 2 R : [12].
b b L V ex þ

Exercises

1. A two-stage limiter circuit is shown in below figure. The limiter PIN diode at the
output (D2), commonly referred to as the “clean-up stage,” is the diode with
thinner I layer, selected so that the threshold level of the circuit is low enough to
protect the remainder of the receiver components. The limiter diode at the input
(D1), often called the “coarse limiter,” has a thicker I layer for several reasons.
The P layer diameter can be larger for a diode with a thicker I layer while
maintaining a capacitance value that produces low insertion loss under small
input signal conditions. The circuit components are connected by microstrip
segments. We consider for simplicity that the microstrip segments resistances
are neglected and either related voltages Vsk ! e, k = 1,…,5. Two limiter
diode’s equivalent circuit parameters are not the same. We consider coming
signal cause at t = 0 voltage V(t = 0).
268 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

Va ðtÞ ¼ Vain ðt  s1 Þ;
X
2 X
3
Vb ðtÞ ¼ Va ðt  s2 Þ ¼ Vain ðt  si Þ; Vc ðtÞ ¼ Vb ðt  s3 Þ ¼ Vain ðt  si Þ
i¼1 i¼1
X
4
Vcout ðtÞ ¼ Vb ðt  s4 Þ ¼ Vain ðt  si Þ; IL ðtÞ ! IL ðt  s5 Þ
i¼1

1:1 Write two stage limiter system differential equations.


1:2 Try to recognize our system differential equations as forced Van der Pol
equations. Write our two-stage limiter circuit as autonomous system.
1:3 Discuss system stability for the following cases:
P2 P
3 P4 pffiffiffi
(a) s1 ¼ s; i¼1 si ¼ s2 ; si ¼ s3 ; i¼1 si ¼ s3 þ s; s5 ¼ s
i¼1
pffiffiffi P2 pffiffiffi P3 pffiffiffi pffiffiffi P4
(b) s1 ¼ s; si ¼ s  s; si ¼ s  s þ 3 s; si ¼
i¼1 i¼1 i¼1
pffiffiffi pffiffiffi pffiffiffi
s  s þ ð 3 sÞ 2 ; s5 ¼ s
How s value variations influence our system stability?
1:4 How our system dynamic and stability behavior changes when “Clean up”
limiter PIN diode is disconnected?
1:5 How our system dynamic and stability behavior changes when “Coarst”
limiter PIN diode is disconnected?
1:6 Microstrip segment No. 5 delay (s5 ) is dependent on other segment’s delay
P pffiffiffiffi
summation s5 ¼ f ð 4i¼1 si Þ; s1 ¼ s. si þ 1 ¼ si 8 i ¼ 1; ::; 3. Try to find f()
function which our system is stable for any value of s parameter. Which
possible f() functions there is a stability switching under variation of s
parameter. Investigate stability behavior.

2. We have limiter circuit system which characterize by two differential equations


(with delays s1 ; s2 ; s3 ).
pffiffiffiffiffi X X
1 dVðt  s2 Þ d 2 Vðt  s2 Þ 3 3
V0 ðtÞ ¼ ½  þ C1   Li þ Vðt  sk Þ
R1 dt dt2 i¼0 k¼2

1 dV X
2
d V 2 X
3
Vi ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ½  þ½ Ci   2   Li þ V
P
3 dt i¼1
dt i¼0
Ri
i¼1

2:1 Draw possible limiter circuits which can fulfil above system differential
equations. Vi—incoming RF signal voltage, Vo—out-going RF signal,
Exercises 269

V—circuit internal voltage variable. si ði ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ represent microstrip


segment delay parameters.
2:2 Find equivalent Van der Pol equation. Represent our system as an auton-
omous system.
2:3 Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of s1 ; s2 ; s3
parameters.
P3
2:4 i¼1 Ri ! 1, Draw our limiter circuit. Find equivalent Van der Pol
equation. Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of Ci,
i = 1,2.
2:5 Discuss system stability behavior for different values of R1 and L2.

3. We have active circulator of four ports, namely P1, P2, P3 and P4. Active cir-
culator is a four terminal device in which input from one port is transmitted to the
next port in rotation. The RF input signal is given at P1 of the circulator from the
left side. This signal from P1 is transmitted to P2. We can connect LC (L1, C1)
components in series to P2 port which results in phase shift and helps to reflect
the signal to P3 at the right. We can connect LC (L2, C2) components in series to
P3 port which results in phase shift and helps to reflect the signal to P4 at the
right. At P4 we get an output RF signal. Each active circulator terminal faces a
delay parasitic effect of signal transferring in time. Our circuit is a Reflection
Type Phase Shifter (RTPS), employing a circulator. The circuit configuration of
the active circulator used four MESFETs which are the GEC-Marconi standard
library cell F20-FET-4x75. A typical four ports decade bandwidth active cir-
culator has four MESFETs transistors interconnected with each other. RF, CF, LF,
CC, Rsb plays a major role in the working of the circuit. The four feedback
branches (RF, CF, LF) are used to link all the four transistors in an end to end
fashion. The source resistor (Rsb) is shared among all the three MESFETs
transistors and one transistor is source coupled with the other two transistors
using this source resistor.
270 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

3:1 Draw four ports active circulator configuration and equivalent circuits.
Write system differential equations.
3:2 Find system equilibrium points (fixed points), consider RFin signal

V1 ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ  gðtÞ ; jf ðtÞj ( 1; jgðtÞj ( 1 ; A0  jf ðtÞj; A0  jgðtÞj

Find small increment Jacobian and characteristic equations.


3:3 Discuss stability behavior and stability switching for different values of s
parameter for the following cases:
P P pffiffiffiffiffi P pffiffiffi
(a) s1 ¼ s; 2i¼1 si ¼ s2 ; 3i¼1 si ¼ s3 ; 4i¼1 si ¼ s3 þ s  s.
pffiffiffi P2 P p ffiffiffiffi
ffi P pffiffiffi
(b) s1 ¼ s; i¼1 si ¼ s3 þ 1; 3i¼1 si ¼ s5 ; 4i¼1 si ¼ s2 þ s  s.
3:4 How our system’s dynamical behavior and stability are influenced if port 3
is disconnected? Write system differential equations and discuss stability
switching for different values of s parameter (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s3 ¼ s).
3:5 We move port 3 termination components (C2, L2) to port 4 and take our RF
out signal from port 3. How our system’s behavior changes? Write system
differential equations and discuss stability behavior.

4. Consider RF system which characterize by Van der Pol equation as autonomous


system, when ðV; W; hÞ 2 R2 x S2 . We suppose a; b  1, since we are interested
in the periodic coming signal response we use 2p
x periodic transformation. The
following equations describe our system:

du1 1 x2  1
¼ 3  /ðVÞ  cos x  t  ð Þ  V  sin x  t
dt P x
½ Rk   C1
k¼1
1 X
2
  sin x  t  Vi ðt  sk Þ
P
3 P
2
x½ Ck   ½ Li  k¼0
k¼1 i¼0

du2 1 x2  1
¼ 3  /ðVÞ  sin x  t  ð Þ  V  cos x  t
dt P x
½ Rk   C1
k¼1
1 X
2
  cos x  t  Vi ðt  sk Þ
P
3 P
2
x½ Ck   Li k¼0
k¼1 i¼0
Exercises 271

4:1 Find the analog basic Van der Pol equation and implement the system by
power limiter diodes and discrete components.
4:2 Discuss stability behavior and stability switching for variation of sk delay
parameter values (k = 0,1,2).
P
4:3 How the system dynamic and stability are changed for ½ 3k¼1 Rk  ! 1?
P2
4:4 How the system dynamic and stability are changed for i¼0 Li ! e ?
P2
k¼0 sk ¼ s . How N parameter
N
4:5 Discuss system stability switching for
values influence our system stability switching.

5. We have cylindrical (closed) RF ladder network structure antennas for coupled


plasma sources copper legs which delayed in time by parasitic effects. The
antenna is mounted outside a glass tube. The RF ladder network antenna con-
sists of 16 copper legs (inductors) equally spaced interconnected with capaci-
tors, each copper leg has parasitic time delay (si þ 1 ¼ si þ si1 ; s1 = s2 =
s 8 i ¼ 2; ::; 15). We consider for simplicity that all copper legs voltages on
delay units (Ve) are neglected Ve ! e. There is a delay in each copper leg
current I1 ðt  s1 Þ; . . .; I16 ðt  s16 Þ. We consider all ladder capacitors are the
same (C) and all ending capacitors are the same (Cend). We consider all antenna
elements inductance values are the same (L). C1 ¼ C2 ¼    ¼ C15 ¼ C16 ¼ C
and CA1 ¼ CA2 ¼    ¼ CA16 ¼ Cend ; L1 ¼ L2 ¼    ¼ L16 ¼ L ; IL1 ¼
I1 ;    ; IL16 ¼ I16 : The antenna ladder network structure is fed by the transmitter
unit (S1 = OFF no direct RF feeding).

RF ladder network
Structure antenna

RF Feeding
Rp
(no direct)

Cylindrical RF ladder network structure can represent as round ladder strip of


capacitors and inductors. The schematic contains RF feeding signal, S1 switch
(S1 = ON for RF signal feeding, S1 = OFF for RF signal transmitter feeding).
Rp is the parasitic resistance of RF feeding direct source.
Remark: Only one ground point exists in our Cylindrical RF ladder network
structure, it is connected to point B8.
272 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

5:1 Write system differential equations and find fixed points.


5:2 Discuss system stability; find Jacobian of our cylindrical RF ladder network
structure antenna system. Find system general characteristic equations.
5:3 Find K−1(C), K−1(Cend), K−1(s) and K−1(L) functions and discuss stability
switching.
5:4 We disconnect odd copper legs (L2∙k+1; k = 0, 1, 2…6, 7) in our cylindrical
RF ladder network structure antenna. How our system stability switching is
effected? Find system differential equations and fixed points, find Jacobian
and discuss stability switching. Find K−1(s) and K−1(L) functions.
5:5 We disconnect even CA capacitors, disconnect CA2∙k; k = 1, 2…7, 8) in our
cylindrical RF ladder network structure antenna. How our system stability
switching is effected? Find system differential equations and fixed points, find
Jacobian and discuss stability switching. Find K−1() and K−1(L) functions.
5:6 We move our system ground to point B12, How our system behavior
changes? Discuss stability switching, K−1() and K−1(L) functions.
6. We have the following TD’s microwave oscillator which two Tunnel Diodes
(TDs) are connected in series. TD’s biasing circuit is constructed from DC
voltage Vb, inductor Lb which block oscillation from Vb source and capacitor Cb
Exercises 273

which shorts to ground Vb bias voltage’s oscillations. The DC voltage Vb biases


the tunnel diode TD into its negative resistance region and also supplies the
power used in amplifying the input signal Vi. Switch S1 is ON and S2 in ON
(bypass our signal source Vi) and our circuit functions as a oscillator. S3 can be
in OFF state or ON state. Microwave resonant cavities is represented and
thought of as simple LC circuits. We represent our microwave cavity as resonant
LC circuit. Due to cavity parasitic effects there are delays in the currents which
flow through equivalent resonant L and C elements and TD’s voltage derivative
in time. s1 ; s2 are the time delays for the TD’s voltage derivative in time
respectively (D1 & D2). s3 is the time delay for the current flows through C
element. RL is the load resistance. Load resistance (RL) is chosen so that RL < |
min (Rd1, Rd2)| in the TD’s characteristic NDR region. At the Tunnel diodes
operating points, the total circuit differential resistance is negative. We consider
for simplicity, two Tunnel diodes parameters are the same.

6:1 Find tunnel diodes system fixed points for the cases S3 = OFF/ON.
6:2 Find Tunnel diodes system differential equations for the cases
S3 = OFF/ON. How the system dynamic changes for two positions of
switch S3.
6:3 Find tunnel diodes system characteristic equations for two cases of S3
switch.
6:4 Discuss stability switching for variation of si ði ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ delay parameter
values.
6:5 How the system dynamical behavior changes if resistor RL is disconnected?
6:6 What happened if we bypass D2 tunnel diode (short) and S3 = ON con-
stantly? Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of s3
delay parameter.
274 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

7. We have planar RTD (Resonant Tunneling Diode) oscillator which eliminate


parasitic bias oscillations in an oscillator circuitry by employing a shunt resistor
to the NDR device. A non-linear (diode) resistor, Schottky diode. Sd and Re are
a Schottky diode and a resistance, respectively, and form the stabilizing
resistance. Ce is a decoupling capacitor (is an RF short circuit), while “TML” is
said to be quarter wave transmission line with signal time delay s. At millimeter
wave and low terahertz frequencies (<1 THz), planar RTD oscillator have been
integrated at the center of the slot antenna, a location at which the antenna input
impedance is infinity.

The above schematic is Reddy’s bias stabilization scheme for sum mm- wave
RTD oscillators. Rb is the resistance of the bias line. Sd, Re and Ce are the
Schottky diode, external resistor and external capacitor, respectively, which
form stabilizing circuit. TML is the quarter wave length transmission line at the
oscillation frequency. RF load is pure resistive Rload and resonant circuit is
parallel LC circuit. We consider that Schottky diode current function is
qðVID RS Þ
ID ¼ IS  ½e nKT  1 þ Gx  V. n—Ideality factor, IS—Reverse saturation
current, k—Boltzman constant, T—Absolute temperature, V—Bias voltage,
GX ∙ V—Edge leakage current, ID  RS —Voltage drop due to ohmic contact
and bulk resistance of semiconductor channel (Ohmic contact is a metal
semiconductor contact that has a linear I-V and non-rectifying characteristics).
Remark: You should consider RTD equation as in subchapter TD’s equation.
The input impedance of a transmission line of length L with characteristic
impedance Z0 and connected to load with impedance ZA (in our case ZA is RTD
element in parallel to RF load and resonant circuit).
Zin ðLÞ ¼ Z0  ½ZZA0 þþ jZ
jZ0 tgðbLÞ
A tgðbLÞ
; Z A ¼ ZAR þ j  ZAI
Exercises 275

k
k ZA þ j  Z0  tgð2p
k  4Þ Z02 k
Zin ðL ¼ Þ ¼ Z0  ½ k
 ¼ : Zin ðL ¼ Þ ¼ 50 Ohm
4 Z0 þ j  ZA  tgð k  4Þ
2p ZA 4

We know the values for ZAR and ZAI . Need to find Z0 expression.
7:1 Find Reddy’s bias stabilization Scheme fixed point and differential
equations.
7:2 Discuss stability switching for different values of s parameter (quarter wave
transmission line delay time).
7:3 What happened if Ce is disconnected? How the system dynamic change?
7:4 Find the following functions: K(Z0), K(ZA), K(Gx), K(VV), K(m).
Remark: VV and m parameters are RTD’s Internal parameters.
7:5 Discuss stability and dynamical behavior if Schottky diode Sd is shorted.
8. We have tunnel diodes system as a microwave oscillator. D1 and D2 are tunnel
diodes which are connected back to back configuration. There are two biasing
circuits (Vb1, Rb1 and Vb2, Rb2). Additionally there is a smart function element
which his voltage (VA − VB) is a complicated function of tunnel diodes cur-
rents respectively. TD’s parasitic effects cause to current time delays s1 and s2
pffiffiffi
respectively ID1 ðtÞ ! ID1 ðt  s1 Þ ID2 ðtÞ ! ID2 ðt  s2 Þ; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s þ s.
At time t = 0 switch S1, S2 and S3 move to ON state. We consider for sim-
plicity, two tunnel diodes are identical (internal parameters are the same) and
TD’s current function is as discuss in the chapter.
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
VAB ¼ gðID1 ; ID2 Þ ¼ fmaxðID1 ; ID2 Þ þ ID1  ID2 g  C; maxðID1 ; ID2 Þ
1 1
¼  ðID1 þ ID2 Þ þ  jID1  ID2 j
2 2

C—Resistive parameter. L, C—Parallel resonant circuit.


276 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis

8:1 Find system fixed points and differential equations.


8:2 Discuss system stability switching for different values of s time delay
parameter.
8:3 How the system dynamic changed if at time t = 0, switch S1 and S2 move
to ON state and S3 is constantly in OFF state? Find fixed points and discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameter.
8:4 How the system dynamic changed if at time t = 0, switch S1 and S3 move
to ON state and S2 is constantly in OFF state? Find fixed points and discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameter.
8:5 Find the following functions: K(C), C(R), K(L), and K(C).
8:6 How the system dynamic changed if at time t = 0, switch S1 move to ON
state and S2, S3 is constantly in OFF state? Find fixed points and discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameter.
9. We have tunnel diode’s bridge structure system as a microwave oscillator. D1,
D2, D3 and D4 are tunnel diodes in our bridge structure. For simplicity all tunnel
diodes are identical (they have the same internal parameters values). There are
two biasing circuits (Vb1, Rb1 and Vb2, Rb2). Switches S1 and S2 connect biasing
circuits to tunnel diode bridge structure. TD’s bridge structure contacts parasitic
effects cause to current time delays s1 and s2 respectively. We have three pos-
sible cases: (1) S1 = ON, S2 = OFF, (2) S1 = OFF, S2 = ON, (3) S1 = ON,
S2 = ON. TD’s current function is as discuss in the chapter. Resonant circuit
No. 1 includes Inductor and capacitor in parallel (L1, C1). Resonant circuit
No. 2 includes inductor and capacitor in parallel (L2, C2). Initially all switched
are in OFF state, at time t = 0 we move to one of the above cases.
Exercises 277

9:1 Find system fixed points and differential equations for the three cases. Find
the related characteristic equations.
9:2 Discuss stability switching for different values of s1 and s2 time delay
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
parameters. How system dynamic changes for s1 ¼ s2 þ 1?
9:3 Find the following functions: K(s1 ), C(s2 ), K(L1), and K(C2).
9:4 D2 tunnel diode is disconnected, how system dynamical behavior changes?
Discuss stability and stability switching.
9:5 D1 tunnel diode is disconnected, how system dynamical behavior changes?
Discuss stability and stability switching.
10. We have the following custom TD’s current expression as a function of volt-
ages VDi. VDi represents specific TD’s voltage, the current which flow through
all TDs is the same (TDs are in series).

X
3
ID ¼ nðVD Þ ¼ gk ðVDi Þ
k¼1
P
2
Y
3 V
VDi Y
2 VDi þ 1 m
½ðgVDi Þ1 i¼1 ½ð V0 Þ 
¼ Is  f e th gþ f e g
i¼1
R0 i¼1
P
2
VDi Y
4 VDi VV
þ i¼1
f e½ Vex  g
RV i¼2
Y
3 V
½ðgVDi Þ1
g1 ðVDi Þ ¼ Is  f e th g;
i¼1
P
2 P
2
VDi Y
2 V þ1
VDi Y 4 VDi VV
½ð DiV Þm 
g2 ðVDi Þ ¼ i¼1 f e 0 g; g3 ðVDi Þ ¼ i¼1  f e½ Vex  g
R0 i¼1
RV i¼2

We connect our TDs in series to parallel LC resonant circuit and load Rload.
Additionally, we add biasing circuit (Vb, Rb).
10:1 Find system fixed points and differential equations.
10:2 Discuss system stability switching for different values of L, C resonant
circuit values.
10:3 One of the TD in series is shorted, How it influence our system dynamic?
Discuss fixed points and stability switching for different values of m
parameter.
(Hint: Discuss all possible cases for short TDs).
10:4 We define TD’s contact delays as sl ðl ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ respectively, Find K(sl ),
K(VV), K(Vex) functions.
Chapter 3
Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers
Analysis

Microwave semiconductor amplifiers are widely used in many engineering appli-


cations. Among microwave semiconductors there are bipolar transistors which
operate at microwave frequencies, microwave Field Effect Transistors (FET)
minimize the adverse effects of transit time and internal capacitance and resistance,
IMPATT (IMPact ionization Avalanche Transit-Time) amplifiers which widely use
at the high end of the microwave band because microwave transistor do not work
well above 30 GHz due to transit time limitations. Stability of these microwave
amplifiers is affected by internal parameters variation and circuit microstrip parasitic
effects. In any microwave system there are parasitic elements with delays in time
which affect the performance and stability of the system. There are also IMPATT
diodes which are a form of high power diode used in high frequencies electronic
and microwave devices. The main advantage of IMPATT diode is the high power
capability and frequency band of 3 to 100 GHz and more. FET combined biasing
and matching circuit has many stability issues which must be taken for every RF
design [14, 15].

3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies


Description and Stability Analysis

Bipolar transistors are widely in use for many engineering applications. The bipolar
transistor consists of an N-doped semiconductors the emitter, a P-doped semicon-
ductor called the base, and an N – doped semiconductor called the collector. The
transistor consists of two PN junctions, one between the emitter and the base, the
other between the base and the collector. The base collector junction is reverse
biased by a rather large voltage. The emitter base junction is forward biased. When
the junction is reversed biased no current flows. Current begins to flow when the
junction is forward biased about specific voltage (*0.6 V). No current flows across

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 279


O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_3
280 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

the reverse biased base collector junction. The amplification of AC signal by a


bipolar transistor is widely used in every circuit. Initial state is when the emitter
base junction is DC biased and there is no AC signal applied. When the input AC
signal to be amplified is added to the DC bias, the voltage between the emitter and
the base increase (AC signal is positive). The current flows from the emitter into the
base. When the input AC signal is negative, it subtracts from the DC bias. There is
also an AC current gain. There is a difference in the operation between a microwave
bipolar transistor and a low frequency bipolar transistor. The operation is the same
except for the degrading effects of transit time, internal capacitance and resistance,
and external lead inductance that occur at microwave frequencies. Because the
electrons take a finite time to travel across the emitter base junction, through the
base, and across the base collector junction, the AC current is reduced at microwave
frequencies, compared with low frequencies. The velocity of microwaves, which is
the same as the velocity of light 3  108 sec m
. Electrons in semiconductor travel
approximately 1/3000 slower, or 10^8 mm per second. The distance that a
microwave or an electron travels in one microwave cycle is the velocity divided by
the frequency (Lcycle ¼ vf). Next is the bipolar transistor at microwave frequencies.
As the microwave signal enters the transistor, it must flow through the capacitance
of the forward biased emitter base junction (Ci). This capacitance exists in low
frequency transistor, but its reactance at low frequencies is negligible. Feedback
capacitance between the collector and base is important at microwave frequencies,
namely the capacitance of the reverse biased base collector junction (Cf). An output

Fig. 3.1 Bipolar transistor at microwave frequencies


3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 281

collector capacitance between the collector and emitter exists (Co). In addition, the
bonding wire connecting the transistor chip to the input and output microwave
transmission lines have inductance (Lin, Lo). The lower microwave frequency, the less
severe are the transit time effects, because the microwave cycle is longer and the
electrons have time to move through the transistor. At low microwave frequencies, the
base collector junction thickness can be made large and a higher voltage can be applied
and more power can be obtained at low microwave frequencies than at high micro-
wave frequencies. By using Ebers Moll transistor model (see S.M. Sze, Physics of
Semiconductor Devices), we get the following bipolar transistor at microwave fre-
quency equivalent circuit. X(t) is the microwave source input signal [24, 25, 33, 34].
IC ¼ Ic ; IE ¼ Ie .

IRC ¼ ICf þ IC þ IC0 þ ILout ; ILout ¼ IRL ; ILin þ ICf þ IRb ¼ Ib ; Alfa  f ¼ af
Alfa  R ¼ ar ; IC þ IDC  af  IDE ¼ 0; Ib ¼ IDC þ IDE  ar  IDC  af  IDE
Ib ¼ IDC  ð1  ar Þ þ IDE  ð1  af Þ; IDE  ar  IDC ¼ IE ; IC ¼ IDC þ af  IDE
VCC  VA1
ILin ¼ ICin ; VA2 ¼ VBE ; VA2  VA1 ¼ VBC ; ¼ IRC ;
RC
dIL
VA1 ¼ VLout þ VRL ¼ Lout  out þ ILout  RL
dt
dVA1 dVCf Vbb  VA2
I C0 ¼ C 0  ; VA4 ¼ Vbb ; VA1  VA2 ¼ VCf ; ICf ¼ Cf  ; ¼ IR b
dt dt Rb
dILin dVCin
XðtÞ  VA2 ¼ VLin þ VCin ; VLin ¼ Lin  ; ICin ¼ Cin  ; XðtÞ  VA3 ¼ VLin
dt dt
Vbe Vbc
VA2  VA3 ¼ VCin ; VA4 ¼ Vbb ; IDE ¼ ISE  ½eð VT Þ  1; IDC ¼ ISC  ½eð VT Þ  1

Fig. 3.2 Bipolar transistor at microwave frequencies equivalent circuit


282 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

af  ISE ¼ ar  ISC ¼ IS (See S.M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices).


af ar
bf ¼ ;b ¼ ; IE ¼ IB þ IC ) IB ¼ I E  IC ;
1  af r 1  ar
1 1  af 1 1 1  ar 1
1¼ ¼ ; 1¼ ¼
af af bf ar ar br
Vbe Vbc
IE ¼ IDE  ar  IDC ¼ ISE  ½eð VT Þ  1  ar  ISC  ½eð VT Þ  1
IS Vbe Vbc
¼  ½eð VT Þ  1  IS  ½eð VT Þ  1
af
Vbc Vbe
IC ¼ IDC þ af  IDE ¼ ISC  ½eð VT Þ  1 þ af  ISE  ½eð VT Þ  1
IS Vbc Vbe
¼   ½eð VT Þ  1 þ IS  ½eð VT Þ  1
ar
IS Vbe Vbc IS Vbc Vbe
IB ¼ IE  IC ¼  ½eð VT Þ  1  IS  ½eð VT Þ  1  f  ½eð VT Þ  1 þ IS  ½eð VT Þ  1g
af ar
Vbe 1 Vbc 1 IS Vbe IS Vbc
IB ¼ IS  ½eð VT Þ  1  ð  1Þ þ IS  ½eð VT Þ  1  ð  1Þ ¼  ½eð VT  1 þ  ½eð VT Þ  1
af ar bf br

We can define the following terminology variables and parameters:


IC —Transistor collector current, IB —Transistor base current, IE —Transistor
emitter current. bf —Transistor forward common emitter current gain (20 → 500),
br - Transistor reverse common emitter current gain (0 → 20), af —Transistor
common base forward short circuit current gain (0.98 → 0.998). VT—Transistor
thermal voltage VT = k  T/q (approximately 26 mV at 300 kelvin ≈ room
temperature).

IC  af  IE IE þ ar  IC Vbe IE þ ar  IC


IDC ¼ ; IDE ¼ ) ISE  ½eð VT Þ  1 ¼
af  ar  1 af  ar  1 af  ar  1
V
ð Vbe Þ IE þ ar  IC V
ð Vbe Þ IE þ ar  IC
ISE  ½e T  1 ¼ )e T ¼f þ 1g
af  ar  1 ISE  ðaf  ar  1Þ
IE þ ar  IC
) Vbe ¼ VT  lnf þ 1g
ISE  ðaf  ar  1Þ
IC  af  IE Vbc IC  a f  IE
IDC ¼ ) ISC  ½eð VT Þ  1 ¼
af  ar  1 af  ar  1
IC  af  IE
) Vbc ¼ VT  lnf þ 1g
ISC  ðaf  ar  1Þ
Vce ¼ Vcb þ Vbe ; Vcb ¼ Vbc ) Vce ¼ Vbc þ Vbe
IE þ ar  IC IC  a f  IE
Vce ¼ VT  lnf þ 1g  VT  lnf þ 1g
ISE  ðaf  ar  1Þ ISC  ðaf  ar  1Þ
VCC  VA1 dVCf
IRC ¼ ICf þ IC þ IC0 þ ILout ) ¼ Cf  þ IC
RC dt
dVA1
þ C0  þ ILout
dt
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 283

dILout
VCC  ½Lout  þ ILout  RL  dVCf
dt
¼ Cf  þ IC
RC dt
d dIL
þ C0  ½Lout  out þ ILout  RL  þ ILout
dt dt
dILout
VCC  Lout  dt  ILout  RL dVCf
¼ Cf  þ IC
RC dt
d 2 ILout dILout
þ C0  ½Lout  þ  RL  þ ILout
dt2 dt
ILin þ ICf þ IRb ¼ Ib ; ILin ¼ ICin ) ICin þ ICf þ IRb ¼ Ib
dVCin dVCf Vbb  VA2
) Cin  þ Cf  þ ¼ Ib
dt dt Rb
dIL
VA1  VA2 ¼ VCf ) VA2 ¼ VA1  VCf ¼ Lout  out þ ILout  RL  VCf ;
dt

then we get
dI
dVCin dVCf Vbb  fLout  dtLout þ ILout  RL  VCf g
ðÞ Cin  þ Cf  þ ¼ Ib
dt dt Rb
XðtÞ  VA2 ¼ VLin þ VCin ) VCin ¼ XðtÞ  VA2  VLin
dIL dILin
¼ XðtÞ  fLout  out þ ILout  RL  VCf g  Lin 
dt dt
dILout dILin
VCin ¼ XðtÞ  Lout   ILout  RL þ VCf  Lin 
dt dt
dVCin dXðtÞ d 2 ILout dILout dVCf d 2 ILin
ðÞ ¼  Lout  2
  RL þ  Lin 
dt dt dt dt dt dt2
d 2 ILout dILout dVCf 2 dVCf
Cin  fdXðtÞ
dt  Lout  dt2  dt  RL þ dt  Lin  d dtILin
2 g þ Cf  dt
ðÞ ! ðÞ dIL
Vbb fLout  outþ ILout RL VCf g
þ dt
Rb ¼ Ib

We have two global system differential equations:


dILout
VCC  Lout   ILout  RL dVCf d 2 ILout dILout
dt
¼ Cf þ IC þ C0  ½Lout  þ  RL  þ ILout
RC dt dt2 dt
dXðtÞ d 2 ILout dILout dVCf d 2 ILin dVCf
Cin   Cin  Lout  2
  Cin  RL þ Cin   Cin  Lin  þ Cf 
dt dt dt dt dt2 dt
dI
Vbb  fLout  dtLout þ ILout  RL  VCf g
þ ¼ Ib
Rb
284 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

dILout
Vbe ¼ VA2 ¼ Lout  þ ILout  RL  VCf ; Vbc ¼ VA2  VA1 ¼ VCf
dt
IS V
ð bc Þ
V
ð be Þ
IC ¼ IDC þ af  IDE ¼   ½e VT  1 þ IS  ½e VT  1
ar
dILout
VC Lout  þ ILout RL VC
IS f dt f
¼   ½eð VT Þ  1 þ IS  ½eð VT Þ
 1
ar
dILout
Lout  þ ILout RL VC VC
IS Vbe IS Vbc IS dt f IS f
IB ¼  ½eð VT Þ  1 þ  ½eð VT Þ  1 ¼  ½eð VT Þ
 1 þ  ½eð VT Þ  1
bf br bf br

dILout dVCf
We define new variables: Y1 ¼ dt ; Y2 ¼ dt

VCC  Lout  Y1  ILout  RL dY1


¼ Cf  Y2 þ IC þ C0  ½Lout  þ Y1  RL  þ ILout
RC dt
dY1 VCC  Lout  Y1  ILout  RL
C0  Lout  ¼  Cf  Y2  Y1  C0  RL  ILout  IC
dt RC
dY1 1 1 1 Cf
¼   ½VCC   Y1  RL  
dt RC C0 Lout C0  Lout
RL 1 1
 Y2  Y1    ILout   IC
Lout C0  Lout C0  Lout

IC function: IC ¼ n1 ¼ n1 ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ

dY1 1 1 1 Cf RL 1
¼   ½VCC   Y1  R L    Y2  Y1    IL
dt RC C0 Lout C0  Lout Lout C0  Lout out
1
  n ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ
C0  Lout 1

dXðtÞ d 2 ILout dILout dVCf d 2 ILin


Cin   Cin  Lout    Cin  RL þ Cin   Cin  L in 
dt dt2 dt dt dt2
dILout
dVCf Vbb  fLout  dt þ ILout  RL  VCf g
þ Cf  þ ¼ Ib
dt Rb

Ib function: Ib ¼ n2 ¼ n2 ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ

dXðtÞ d 2 ILout d 2 ILin dIL dVCf


Cin   Cin  ½Lout  2
þ L in  2
  out  Cin  RL þ ½Cin þ Cf  
dt dt dt dt dt
dI
Vbb  Lout  dtLout  ILout  RL þ VCf
þ ¼ Ib
Rb
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 285

We define new variable:

dY3 d 2 ILout d 2 ILin dIL dILin


¼ Lout  2
þ Lin  ; Y3 ¼ Lout  out þ Lin 
dt dt dt2 dt dt
dILout dILin dILin dILin 1 Lout
Y3 ¼ Lout  þ Lin  ) Y3 ¼ Lout  Y1 þ Lin  ) ¼ Y3    Y1
dt dt dt dt Lin Lin
dY3 dXðtÞ
Cin  ¼ Cin   Y1  Cin  RL þ ½Cin þ Cf 
dt dt
Vbb  Lout  Y1  ILout  RL þ VCf
 Y2 þ  Ib
Rb
dY3 dXðtÞ Cf Vbb  Lout  Y1  ILout  RL þ VCf 1
¼  Y1  RL þ ½1 þ   Y2 þ   Ib
dt dt Cin Rb  Cin Cin
dY3 Cf Vbb  Lout  Y1  ILout  RL þ VCf
¼ Y1  RL þ ½1 þ   Y2 þ
dt Cin Rb  Cin
1 dXðtÞ
  n ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ þ
Cin 2 dt
dY3 Lout Cf RL 1
¼ ½RL þ   Y1 þ ½1 þ   Y2  ILout  þ VCf 
dt Rb  Cin Cin Rb  Cin Rb  Cin
1 Vbb dXðtÞ
  n ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ þ þ
Cin 2 Rb  Cin dt

We can summery our circuit differential equations:

dY1 1 1 1 Cf RL 1
¼   ½VCC   Y1  RL    Y2  Y1    IL
dt RC C0 Lout C0  Lout Lout C0  Lout out
1
  n ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ
C0  Lout 1
dY3 Lout Cf RL 1
¼ ½RL þ   Y1 þ ½1 þ   Y2  ILout  þ VCf 
dt Rb  Cin Cin Rb  Cin Rb  Cin
1 Vbb dXðtÞ
  n ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ þ þ
Cin 2 Rb  Cin dt
dILin 1 Lout dIL dVCf
¼ Y3    Y1 ; out ¼Y1 ; ¼ Y2
dt Lin Lin dt dt

We find our system equilibrium points by setting dY1


dt ¼ 0; dYdt3 ¼ 0; dIdtLin ¼ 0

dILout dVCf dIL dVCf dILin


¼0; ¼ 0: out ¼ 0 ) Y1 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) Y3 ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt dt
286 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

dY1 1 1 1 1 1
¼0)   ½VCC   RL    I 
dt RC C0 Lout C0  Lout Lout C0  Lout
 n1 ðVCf ; Y1 ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ ¼ 0
dY3 RL 1 1
¼ 0 ) ILout  þ VCf  
dt Rb  Cin Rb  Cin Cin
Vbb dXðtÞ
 n2 ðVCf ; Y1 ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ þ þ ¼0
Rb  Cin dt

IC function: IC ¼ n1 ¼ n1 ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ and Ib function:


Ib ¼ n2 ¼ n2 ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ

V  I  RL V 
IS Cf Lout Cf
n1 ðVCf ; Y1 ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ ¼   ½eð VT Þ
 1 þ IS  ½e ð VT Þ
 1
ar
I R V  V 
Lout L
IS Cf
IS Cf
n2 ðVCf ; Y1 ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ ¼  ½eð VT Þ
 1 þ  ½eð VT Þ
 1
bf br

We consider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |fX(t)|  1 and A0  |


dfX ðtÞ
fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 ) dXðtÞ
dt ¼ dt ! e . We get the following two
equations for our ILout ; VCf fixed points: dXðtÞ
dt !e

1 1 1 1 1
  ½VCC   RL    ILout 
RC C0 Lout C0  Lout C0  Lout
V  I  RL V 
IS Cf Lout Cf
 f  ½eð VT Þ
 1 þ IS  ½eð VT Þ
 1g ¼ 0
ar
I R V 
Lout L
RL 1 1 IS ð
Cf
Þ
 ILout  þ VCf    f  ½e VT
 1
Rb  Cin Rb  Cin Cin bf
V 
IS Cf
Vbb
þ  ½eð VT Þ
 1g þ ¼0
br Rb  Cin

Our system fixed points are E ðÞ ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; ILout VCf Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; ILout ; VCf Þ . We
V 
Cf
need to find the expressions for ILout ; VCf . First exponent is eð VT Þ
. We define new
VC 
exponent argument VT
f
¼ C1 ) eC1 1  C1 by using Taylor series approxima-
tion. We define our Taylor series approximation in the interval 0\C1 \1 )
V 
VC ð
Cf
Þ VC
0\ VT
f
\1 ) 0\VCf \VT )e VT
1 VT
f
. Second exponent is
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 287

I  RL V 
ð
Lout Cf
Þ ILout RL VC
e VT
. We define new exponent argument VT
f
¼ C2 and there are two
ILout RL VC ILout RL VC ILout RL VC
cases: VT
f
[ 0 and VT
f
\0. First case VT
f
[ 0 ) VT ¼
VC
26 mV ) ILout  RL  VCf [ 0 ) RL [ f
ILout and by using Taylor series approxi-
I  RL V 
 ð
Lout Cf
Þ ILout RL VC ILout RL VC
mation: eC2 ¼ e VT
1þ VT
f
. Second case VT
f
\0 ) VT ¼
VC
26 mV ) ILout  RL  VCf \0 ) 0\RL \ f
ILout and by using Taylor series
approximation:
I  RL V 
Lout Cf
C2 jC2 j ð Þ
e j C \0
2
¼e ¼1 jC2 j ¼e VT

I  RL V 
  ð
Lout Cf
Þ
ILout  RL  VCf
eC2 jC2 \0 ¼ ejC2 j ¼ 1  jC2 j ¼ e VT
1j jC2 \0
VT
ILout  RL  VCf
¼ 1þ
VT

We implement our Taylor series approximation expressions into below


equations:

1 1 1 1 1 IS V C
ð# Þ   ½VCC   RL    ILout   f  f þ IS
RC C0 Lout C0  Lout C0  Lout ar VT
ILout  RL  VCf
½ g
VT
¼0
  
RL 1 1 IS IL  RL  VCf IS V C Vbb
ð##Þ  ILout  þ VCf    f  ½ out   fgþ ¼0
Rb  Cin Rb  Cin Cin bf VT br VT Rb  Cin

1 1 IS IL  IS  RL IS  VCf
ð#Þ !  Lout  ½VCC   RL   ILout  f  VCf þ out  g¼0
RC Lout ar  V T VT VT

1 VC IS IS  RL
 ½VCC  Lout  RL  þ f  ½IS    ILout  ½ þ 1 ¼ 0 ) ILout
RC VT  ar VT
VC
1
RC  ½VCC  Lout  RL  þ VT
f
 ½IS  aISr 
¼
½ISVRT L þ 1
288 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

  
IS ILout  RL  VCf IS VC
ð##Þ ! ILout  RL þ VCf  Rb  f ½    f g þ Vbb ¼ 0
bf VT br VT
 
IS ILout  RL  VCf IS
ILout  RL þ VCf  Rb   ½  þ Rb   V  þ Vbb ¼ 0
bf VT br  VT Cf

IS 1 IS IS
VCf  ½1 þ Rb   þ Rb    ILout  RL  ½Rb  þ 1 þ Vbb ¼ 0
bf VT br  VT bf  VT
IS IS
VC ½1 þ Rb b þ Rb b  þ Vbb
f VT r VT
ILout ¼ f
IS . We have two expressions for ILout then
RL ½Rb b þ 1
f VT
V
Cf IS IS
RC ½VCC Lout RL  þ VT
1 I
½IS aSr  VC ½1 þ Rb b þ Rb b  þ Vbb
f VT r VT
IS RL ¼ f
IS
½ V þ 1 RL ½Rb b V þ 1
T f T

1 IS VC 1 IS
 ½VCC  Lout  RL   RL  ½Rb  þ 1 þ f  IS  ½1    RL  ½Rb  þ 1
RC bf  VT VT ar b f  VT
IS IS I S  RL IS  R L
¼ VCf  ½1 þ Rb  þ Rb  ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1  Vbb
b f  VT br  VT VT VT
1 1 IS Rb  I S 1 1 I S  RL
VCf  f  IS  ½1    RL  ½Rb  þ 1  ½1 þ  ð þ Þ  ½ þ 1g
VT ar bf  VT VT bf br VT
I S  RL 1 IS
¼½ þ 1  Vbb   ½VCC  Lout  RL   RL  ½Rb  þ 1
VT RC bf  VT
½ISVRT L þ 1  Vbb  R1C  ½VCC  Lout  RL   RL  ½Rb  b IVS T þ 1
VCf ’ Rb IS
f
1
VT  IS  ½1  a1r   RL  ½Rb  b IVS T þ 1  ½1 þ VT  ðb1 þ b1 Þ  ½ISVRT L þ 1
f f r

VCf  ½1 þ Rb  b IVS T þ Rb  b IVS T  þ Vbb VCf  ½1 þ Rb  b IVS T þ Rb  b IVS T 


ILout ’ f r
¼ f r

RL  ½Rb  b IVS T þ 1 RL  ½Rb  b IVS T þ 1


f f

Vbb
þ
RL  ½Rb  b IVS T þ 1
f

½ISVRT L þ 1  Vbb  R1C  ½VCC  Lout  RL   RL  ½Rb  b IVS T þ 1


ILout ’ f 1 Rb IS
f
g
VT  IS  ½1  a1r   RL  ½Rb  b IVS T þ 1  ½1 þ VT  ðb1 þ b1 Þ  ½ISVRT L þ 1
f f r

½1 þ Rb  b IVS T þ Rb  b IVS T  Vbb


f f r

RL  ½Rb  b IVS T þ 1 RL  ½Rb  b IVS T þ 1
f f

There is other way to find our system fixed points. First we write our system
differential equations:
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 289

dILout dIL 1 RL
VA1 ¼ Lout  þ ILout  RL ) out ¼  VA1  ILout 
dt dt Lout Lout
dVA1 dVA1 1 1
IC0 ¼ C0  ) ¼  I C0 ¼  ðIRC  ICf  IC  ILout Þ; ICf ¼ Ib  IRb  ILin
dt dt C0 C0
1 1
 I C0 ¼  ðIRC  ½Ib  IRb  ILin   IC  ILout Þ
C0 C0
1
¼  ðIRC  ½Ib þ IC  þ IRb þ ILin  ILout Þ
C0
VCC  VA1 1 1 VCC  VA1
¼ IRC )  I C0 ¼ ð  ½Ib þ IC  þ IRb þ ILin  ILout Þ
RC C0 C0 RC
Vbb  VA2 1 1 VCC  VA1 Vbb  VA2
¼ IR b )  I C0 ¼ ð  ½Ib þ IC  þ ½  þ ILin  ILout Þ
Rb C0 C0 RC Rb

dILout dIL
IC ¼ n1 ¼ n1 ðVCf ; ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ; Ib ¼ n2 ¼ n2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt dt
dVA1 1 VCC  VA1 dILout
¼ ð  ½n2 ðVCf ; ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt C0 RC dt
dIL Vbb  VA2
þ n1 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ þ ½  þ ILin  ILout Þ;
dt Rb
VA1  VA2 ¼ VCf ) VA2 ¼ VA1  VCf
dVA1 1 VCC  VA1 dIL
¼ ð  ½n2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt C0 RC dt
dIL Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
þ n1 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ þ ½  þ ILin  ILout Þ
dt Rb

dVCf dVCf 1 1 dIL


I Cf ¼ C f  ) ¼  I Cf ¼  ðn2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ  IRb  ILin Þ
dt dt Cf Cf dt
dVCf 1 dILout Vbb  VA2
¼  ðn2 ðVCf ; ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ  ½   ILin Þ
dt Cf dt Rb
dVCf 1 dIL Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
¼  ðn2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ  ½   ILin Þ
dt Cf dt Rb
dILin dILin 1
VLin ¼ Lin  ) ¼  ðXðtÞ  ½VA1  VCf   VCin Þ;
dt dt Lin
dVCin dVCin 1 1
ICin ¼ Cin  ) ¼  ICin ¼  ILin
dt dt Cin Cin
290 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

We can summery our system differential equations:

dILout 1 RL
¼  VA1  ILout 
dt Lout Lout
dVA1 1 VCC  VA1 dIL
¼ ð  ½n2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt C0 RC dt
dIL Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
þ n1 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ þ ½  þ ILin  ILout Þ
dt Rb
dVCf 1 dIL Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
¼  ðn2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ  ½   ILin Þ
dt Cf dt Rb
dILin 1 dVCin 1
¼  ðXðtÞ  ½VA1  VCf   VCin Þ; ¼  ILin
dt Lin dt Cin

At equilibrium points (fixed points):

dILout dVA1 dVCf dILin


¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼0
dt dt dt dt
dVCin  1  1 RL
¼ 0: ILin ¼ 0;  ðXðtÞ  ½VA1  VCf   VCin Þ ¼ 0;  V   ILout
 ¼0
dt Lin Lout A1 Lout

dIL Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
n2 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ  ½ ¼0
dt Rb

VCC  VA1 dIL dIL
 ½n2 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ þ n1 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ
RC dt dt

Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
þ½   ILout ¼ 0
Rb

We consider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |fX(t)| <=1 and A0 > > |
fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 .

A0  ½VA1  VCf   VCin ¼ 0; VA1
 
 ILout  RL ¼ 0;

dILout Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
n2 ðVCf ; ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ  ½ ¼0
dt Rb

VCC  VA1 dIL dIL
 ½n2 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ þ n1 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ
RC dt dt

Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
þ½   ILout ¼ 0; VA1  
 ILout  RL ¼ 0 ) VA1  
¼ ILout  RL
Rb
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 291

Then we get the following equations:

 dILout
A0  ½ILout  RL  VCf   VCin ¼ 0; n2 ðVCf ; ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt

Vbb  ðILout  RL  VCf Þ
½ ¼0
Rb

VCC  ILout  RL dIL
 ½n2 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
RC dt

dIL Vbb  ðILout  RL  VCf Þ
þ n1 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ þ ½   ILout ¼ 0
dt Rb

And we can find analytically or numerically our fixed points (equilibrium points)
value: VCf ; ILout . Additionally ILin
 
¼ 0; VA1 
¼ ILout  RL .
Stability analysis: We define the following functions:
1 RL
f1 ðVA1 ; ILout ; VCf ; ILin ; VCin Þ ¼  VA1  ILout 
Lout Lout
1 VCC  VA1 dIL
f2 ðVA1 ; ILout ; VCf ; ILin ; VCin Þ ¼ ð  ½n2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
C0 RC dt
dILout Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
þ n1 ðVCf ; ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ þ ½  þ ILin  ILout Þ
dt Rb
1 dIL
f3 ðVA1 ; ILout ; VCf ; ILin ; VCin Þ ¼  ðn2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
Cf dt
Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
½   ILin Þ
Rb
1
f4 ðVA1 ; ILout ; VCf ; ILin ; VCin Þ ¼  ðXðtÞ  ½VA1  VCf   VCin Þ;
Lin
1
f5 ðVA1 ; ILout ; VCf ; ILin ; VCin Þ ¼  ILin
Cin
VA1 ¼ VA1 ðtÞ; ILout ¼ ILout ðtÞ; VCf ¼ VCf ðtÞ; ILin ¼ ILin ðtÞ; VCin ¼ VCin ðtÞ
dIL dIL
n1 ¼ n1 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ; n2 ¼n2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt dt

To classify our bipolar transistor microwave system fixed points, we need to


compute the Jacobian (linearized system) [2–4].
0 @f1 @f1
1
@VA1 . . . @VCin
B . .. .. C @f1 @f1 @f1 @f1
A¼B @ .. .
C
. A; N11 ¼ @VA1 ; N12 ¼ @IL ; N13 ¼ @VC ; N14 ¼ @ILin ; N15
@f5 @f5 out f

@VA1    @VCin
@f1
¼
@VCin
292 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

@f2 @f2 @f2 @f2


N21 ¼ ; N22 ¼ ; N23 ¼ ; N24 ¼ ;
@VA1 @ILout @VCf @ILin
@f2 @f3 @f3
N25 ¼ ; N31 ¼ ; N32 ¼
@VCin @VA1 @ILout
@f3 @f3 @f3 @f4
N33 ¼ ; N34 ¼ ; N35 ¼ ; N41 ¼ ;
@VCf @ILin @VCin @VA1
@f4 @f4 @f4
N42 ¼ ; N43 ¼ ; N44 ¼
@ILout @VCf @ILin
@f4 @f5 @f5 @f5 @f5 @f5
N45 ¼ ; N51 ¼ ; N52 ¼ ; N53 ¼ ; N54 ¼ ; N55 ¼
@VCin @VA1 @ILout @VCf @ILin @VCin
@fk @fk @fk @fk @fk
Nk1 ¼ ; Nk2 ¼ ; Nk3 ¼ ; Nk4 ¼ ; Nk5 ¼ ; k ¼ 1; . . .; 5
@VA1 @ILout @VCf @ILin @VCin
0 1
N11 . . . N15
B . .. .. C @f1 1
A¼B @ .. .
C
. A; N11 ¼ @V ¼ L ;
A1 out
N51    N55
@f1 RL @f1
N12 ¼ ¼ ; N13 ¼ ¼0
@ILout Lout @VCf
@f1 @f1 @f2 1 1 @ X 2
1
N14 ¼ ¼ 0; N15 ¼ ¼ 0; N21 ¼ ¼ ð þ ½ n þ Þ
@ILin @VCin @VA1 C0 RC @VA1 k¼1 k Rb
@f2 1 1 1 IS 1 ð
VA1 VC
f
Þ
N21 ¼ ¼ ð þ þ  ½1 þ   e VT Þ
@VA1 C0 RC Rb VT bf

1 VCC  VA1 Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ


f2 ¼ ð  ½n2 þ n1  þ ½  þ ILin  ILout Þ;
C0 RC Rb
@ X 2
IS 1 VA1 VC
f
½ nk  ¼  ½1 þ   eð VT Þ
@VA1 k¼1 VT bf
dIL
VC Lout  þ IL RL VC out
IS f dt out f
n1 ¼ IC ¼   ½eð VT Þ  1 þ IS  ½eð VT Þ
 1
ar
VC VA1 VC
IS f f
¼   ½eð VT Þ  1 þ IS  ½eð VT Þ  1
ar
dIL
Lout  out þ I
Lout RL VCf VC
IS ð
dt
Þ IS ð fÞ
n2 ¼ IB ¼  ½e VT
 1 þ  ½e VT  1
bf br
VA1 VC VC
IS f IS f
¼  ½eð VT Þ  1 þ  ½eð VT Þ  1
bf br
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 293

Exponent function rules:

d f ðxÞ df ðxÞ f ðxÞ A þ B


½e  ¼  e ;e ¼ eA  eB
dx dx
dILout 1 @n IS ðVV Cf Þ 1 VA1 @n1 IS ðVA1VVCf Þ
¼  ½VA1  ILout  RL ; 1 ¼  e T  ½  eð VT Þ ; ¼ e T
dt Lout @VCf VT ar @VA1 VT

@n2 IS VC
f 1 VA1 1 @n2 IS VA1 VC
f
¼   eð VT Þ  ½  e VT þ ; ¼  eð VT Þ
@VCf VT bf br @VA1 bf  VT
@f2 1 @f2 1
N22 ¼ ¼  ; N23 ¼ ¼
@ILout C0 @VCf C0
@n2 @n1 1 1 1 @ X 2
 ð½ þ þ Þ ¼ ½  ð n Þ
@VCf @VCf Rb C0 Rb @VCf k¼1 k
@ X 2
IS ðVV Cf Þ 1 VA1 1 VA1 1
ð nk Þ ¼  e T  f½  e VT   ½  e VT þ g
@VCf k¼1 VT ar bf br
IS ðVV Cf Þ 1 1 VA1 1
¼  e T  ½   e VT  ð1 þ Þ
VT a r br bf

@f2 1 1 @ X 2
N23 ¼ ¼ ½  ð n Þ
@VCf C0 Rb @VCf k¼1 k
1 1 IS ðVV Cf Þ 1 1 VA1 1
¼ f   e T  ½   e VT  ð1 þ Þg
C0 Rb VT a r br bf
@f2 1 @f2 @f3
N24 ¼ ¼ ; N25 ¼ ¼ 0; N31 ¼
@ILin C0 @VCin @VA1
1 @n2 1 1 IS VA1 VC
f 1
¼ ð þ Þ¼ ð  eð VT Þ þ Þ
Cf @VA1 Rb Cf bf  VT Rb
@f3 @f3 1 @n 1
N32 ¼ ¼ 0; N33 ¼ ¼ ð 2  Þ
@ILout @VCf Cf @VCf Rb
1 IS ðVCf Þ 1 VA1 1 1
¼  ð  e VT  ½  e VT þ  þ Þ
Cf VT bf br Rb
@f3 1 @f3 1 Vbb  ðVA1  VCf Þ
N34 ¼ ¼  ; N35 ¼ ¼ 0; f3 ¼  ðn2  ½   ILin Þ
@ILin Cf @VCin Cf Rb

We consider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |fX(t)|  1 and A0  |


fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 .
294 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

@f4 1 @f4 @f4 1


N41 ¼ ¼  ; N42 ¼ ¼ 0; N43 ¼ ¼ ;
@VA1 Lin @ILout @VCf Lin
@f4 @f4 1
N44 ¼ ¼ 0; N45 ¼ ¼
@ILin @VCin Lin
1 @f5
f4  ðA0  ½VA1  VCf   VCin Þ; N51 ¼ ¼ 0;
Lin @VA1
@f5 @f5
N52 ¼ ¼ 0; N53 ¼ ¼0
@ILout @VCf
@f5 1 @f5 1
N54 ¼ ¼ ; N55 ¼ ¼ 0; f5 ¼  ILin
@ILin Cin @VCin Cin
  
We already found our system fixed points: ILin ¼ 0; VA1 ¼ ILout  RL

E  ðVA1
 
; ILout 
; VCf 
; ILin 
; VCin 
Þ ¼ ðILout 
 RL ; ILout 
; VCf 
; 0; VCin Þ

Our system Jacobian elements for our fixed points coordinates are:

1 RL 1 1
N11 ¼ ; N12 ¼  ; N13 ¼ 0; N14 ¼ 0; N15 ¼ 0; N22 ¼  ; N24 ¼
Lout Lout C0 C0
I  RL V 
1 1 1 IS 1 Lout Cf
N21 ¼ ð þ þ  ½1 þ   eð VT Þ Þ; N25 ¼ 0; N32 ¼ 0
C0 RC Rb VT bf
 
1 1 IS ðVV Cf Þ 1 1 I R
Lout L
N23 ¼ f   e T  ½   e VT
C0 Rb VT a r br
I R V  
1 1 IS Lout L Cf 1
 ð1 þ Þg; N31 ¼ ð  eð VT Þ þ Þ
bf Cf bf  VT Rb
V  
1 IS Cf 1 ILout RL 1 1
N33 ¼   ð  eð VT Þ  ½  e VT þ  þ Þ;
Cf V T bf br Rb
1 1
N34 ¼  ; N35 ¼ 0; N54 ¼ ; N55 ¼ 0
Cf Cin
1 1 1
N41 ¼  ; N42 ¼ 0; N43 ¼ ; N44 ¼ 0; N45 ¼  ; N51 ¼ 0; N52 ¼ 0; N53 ¼ 0
Lin Lin Lin

0 1 0 @f1 @f1 1
N11 ... N15 @VA1 ... @VCin
B . C B C
.. ... C B . .. .. C
A ¼ B
@ .. . A j @E  ðVA1
     ¼ B .. . . C j @E  ðVA1
    
;ILout ;VCf ;ILin ;VCin Þ @ A ;ILout ;VCf ;ILin ;VCin Þ
N51  N55     @f5 @f5    
¼ ðILout  RL ; ILout ; VCf ; 0; VCin Þ @VA1  @VCin
¼ ðILout  RL ; ILout ; VCf ; 0; VCin Þ

ðA  k  IÞ ¼ ðA  k  IÞ ) det jA  k  Ij ¼ 0 To classify our system fixed


points.
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 295

We define our system Jacobian elements at fixed points:


   
Nkl @ðILout  RL ; ILout ; VCf ; 0; VCin Þ ! Nkl 8 k ¼ 1; . . .; 5; l ¼ 1; . . .; 5
0 1
ðN33  kÞ  C1f 0
1 B C
det jA  k  Ij ¼ ð  kÞ  ðN22  kÞ  detB
@
1
Lin k  L1in C
A
Lout
0 1
Cin k
0 1
ðN33  kÞ  C1f 0
RL B C
þ  fN21  detB
@
1
Lin k  L1in C
A
Lout
0 1
Cin k
0 1 0 1
N31  C1f 0 N31 ðN33  kÞ 0
B 1 C 1 B 1 C
 N23  detB
@  Lin k  L1in C
A þ C0  det@  Lin
1
Lin  L1in Ag
0 1
k 0 0 k
Cin
0 1
ðN33  kÞ  C1f 0 !  
B C k  L1in 1 1
 L1in
detB
@
1
k  L1in C ¼ ðN  kÞ  det
A 33 þ  det Lin
Lin 1
Cin k Cf 0 k
0 1
Cin k
1 1 1
¼ ðN33  kÞ  ðk2 þ Þ  k
Cin  Lin Cf Lin
1 1 1 N33
¼ k3 þ N33  k2  k  ð þ Þþ
Lin Cin Cf Cin  Lin

0 1
N31  C1f 0 !  
B 1 C k  L1in 1  L1in  L1in
detB
@  Lin k  L1in C
A ¼ N
31  det þ 
1
Cin k Cf 0 k
0 1
Cin k
1 1 1 N31
¼ N31  ðk2 þ Þþ  k ¼ N31  k2 þ  kþ
Cin  Lin Cf  Lin Cf  Lin Cin  Lin
0 1
N31 ðN33  kÞ 0  1   1 
B 1 C   L1in   Lin  L1in
det@  L1in 1
 Lin A ¼ N 31  Lin
 ðN 33  kÞ 
Lin
0 k 0 k
0 0 k
N 1 1 1
¼  31  k  ðN33  kÞ  k¼  k2  k   ðN31 þ N33 Þ
Lin Lin Lin Lin
296 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

We can summery our last results:

1 1
det jA  k  Ij ¼ ð  kÞ  ðN22  kÞ  fk3 þ N33  k2  k 
Lout Lin
1 1 N33
ð þ Þþ g
Cin Cf Cin  Lin
RL 1 1 1 N33
þ  fN21  ½k3 þ N33  k2  k  ð þ Þþ 
Lout Lin Cin Cf Cin  Lin
1
 N23  ðN31  k2 þ k
Cf  Lin
N31 1 1 1
þ Þþ  ½  k2  k   ðN31 þ N33 Þg
Cin  Lin C0 Lin Lin

1 N
det jA  k  Ij ¼ ½k2  k  ð þ N22 Þ þ 22 
Lout Lout
1 1 1 N33
 ½k3 þ N33  k2  k  ð þ Þþ 
Lin Cin Cf Cin  Lin
RL 1 1 1
þ  fk3  N21 þ N21  N33  k2  k  N21  ð þ Þ
Lout Lin Cin Cf
N  N N23
þ 21 33  N23  N31  k2  k
Cin  Lin Cf  Lin
N  N 1 1
 31 23 þ  k2  k   ðN31 þ N33 Þg
Cin  Lin Lin  C0 Lin  C0

1 N
det jA  k  Ij ¼ ½k2  k  ð þ N22 Þ þ 22 
Lout Lout
 1 1 1 N33
 ½k þ N33  k  k 
3 2
ð þ Þþ 
Lin Cin Cf Cin  Lin
RL 1
þ  fk3  N21 þ k2  ½N21  N33  N23  N31 þ 
Lout Lin  C0
1 1 1 N 1
k  ½N21  ð þ Þ þ 23 þ  ðN31 þ N33 Þ
Lin Cin Cf Cf C0
1
þ  ½N21  N33  N31  N23 g
Cin  Lin
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 297

1 1 1 N33
det jA  k  Ij ¼ k5 þ N33  k4  k3  ð þ Þ þ k2 
Lin Cin Cf Cin  Lin
1 1 1 1 1 1
þ k4  ð þ N22 Þ  k3  ð þ N22 Þ  N33 þ k2  ð þ Þð þ N22 Þ
Lout Lout Lin Cin Cf Lout
1 N33 N N
kð þ N22 Þ   k3  22 þ 22  N33  k2  k
Lout Cin  Lin Lout Lout
1 N22 1 1 N33 N22
  ð þ Þþ 
Lin Lout Cin Cf Cin  Lin Lout
RL RL 1
þ  k3   N  þ k2   ½N21  N33  N23  N31 þ 
Lout 21 Lout Lin  C0
RL 1 1 1 N 1
k   ½N21  ð þ Þ þ 23 þ  ðN31 þ N33 Þ
Lout Lin Cin Cf Cf C0
1 RL
þ   ½N21  N33  N31  N23 
Cin  Lin Lout

1
det jA  k  Ij ¼ k5 þ k4  ½N33 þ þ N22   k3
Lout
1 1 1 1 N RL
½ ð þ Þþð þ N22 Þ  N33 þ 22 þ  N 
Lin Cin Cf Lout Lout Lout 21
N33 1 1 1 1 N
þ k2  f þ ð þ Þð þ N22 Þ þ 22
Cin  Lin Lin Cin Cf Lout Lout
R 1
 N33 þ  ½N21  N33  N23  N31 þ
L
g
Lout Lin  C0
1 N33 1 N22 1 1
 k  fð þ N22 Þ  þ  ð þ Þ
Lout Cin  Lin Lin Lout Cin Cf
RL 1 1 1 N 1
þ   ½N21  ð þ Þ þ 23 þ  ðN31 þ N33 Þg
Lout Lin Cin Cf Cf C0
N33 N 1 RL
þ  22 þ   ½N21  N33  N31  N23 
Cin  Lin Lout Cin  Lin Lout

We get fifth degree polynomial in λ (eigenvalue) and define the following


equilibrium parameters:
298 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

1 1 1 1
X5 ¼ 1; X4 ¼ N33 þ þ N22 ; X3 ¼ ½  ð þ Þ
Lout Lin Cin Cf
1 N RL
þð þ N22 Þ  N33 þ 22 þ  N 
Lout Lout Lout 21
N33 1 1 1 1
X2 ¼ þ ð þ Þð þ N22 Þ
Cin  Lin Lin Cin Cf Lout
N RL 1
þ 22  N33 þ  ½N21  N33  N23  N31 þ 
Lout Lout Lin  C0
1 N33 1 N22 1 1
X1 ¼ fð þ N22 Þ  þ  ð þ Þ
Lout Cin  Lin Lin Lout Cin Cf
RL 1 1 1 N 1
þ   ½N21  ð þ Þ þ 23 þ  ðN31 þ N33 Þg;
Lout Lin Cin Cf Cf C0
N33 N 1 RL
X0 ¼  22 þ   ½N21  N33  N31  N23 
Cin  Lin Lout Cin  Lin Lout

X
5 X
5
det jA  k  Ij ¼ ki  Xi ; det jA  k  Ij ¼ 0 ) ki  Xi ¼ 0 ) k1 ; k2 ; . . .
i¼0 i¼0

We need to classify our system stability fixed points according to eigenvalues:

Table 3.1 Bipolar transistor at microwave frequencies system stability fixed points and
eigenvalues
System Eigen values System fixed point classification
P
5
( ki  Xi ¼ 0 ) k1 ; k2 ; . . .; kn )
i¼0
Number of eigenvalues is n
1 λk > 0 and real 8 k 2 ½1; . . .; n Unstable node
n, k are integers
2 λk < 0 and real 8 k 2 ½1; . . .; n Stable node
n, k are integers
3 At least one Eigen value is negative real Saddle point
number (λl < 0) and all other Eigenvalues
are positive real number λk > 0
8 k 2 ½1; . . .; n; n, k, l are integers, λl < 0;
0  l  n; n; l 2 ½0; . . .; n
4 λk < 0 and real 8k 2 ½1; . . .; n Stable spiral (decay oscillation spiral). If at
n, k are integers except λl, λm list one of our Eigenvalues is positive then
kl ¼ c1 þ j  c2 ; km ¼ c1  j  c2 we have Saddle point spiral
0  l  n; 0  m  n; l; m 2 ½1; . . .; n
n, m are integer numbers
c1 \0; c2 [ 0 and real number
l 6¼ m & c1 ¼ Reðkm;n Þ\0
5 λk < 0 and real 8k 2 ½1; . . .; n Unstable spiral (growing oscillation spiral)
n, k are integers except λl, λm
kl ¼ c1 þ j  c2 ; km ¼ c1  j  c2
0  l  n; 0  m  n; l; m 2 ½1; . . .; n
(continued)
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 299

Table 3.1 (continued)


System Eigen values System fixed point classification
P
5
( ki  Xi ¼ 0 ) k1 ; k2 ; . . .; kn )
i¼0
Number of eigenvalues is n
n, m are integer numbers
c1 [ 0; c2 [ 0 and real number
l 6¼ m & c1 ¼ Reðkm;n Þ [ 0
6 kl ¼ c1 þ j  c2 ; km ¼ c1  j  c2 Solutions are periodic with period T ¼ 2p
c
0  l  n ; 0  m  n ; l; m 2 ½1; . . .; n
2

l, n, m are integer numbers


c1 ¼ 0; c2 [ 0 and real number
l 6¼ m & c1 ¼ Reðkm;n Þ ¼ 0, km;n are pure
imaginary

3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave


Frequencies Description

There are three major types of FETs. First type is Junction FET (JFET). The second
type is the metal oxide semiconductor FET (MOSFET). MOSFETs transistor is
widely use as discrete devices in UHF band communications. The third type is
Schottky barrier type FETs made of gallium arsenide. It is known as the Gallium
Arsenide Metal semiconductor FET (GaAs MESFET) which showed performances
better than bipolar transistor. GaAs MESFET provide lower noise and higher gain for
solid state applications, frequency characteristics previously unavailable from bipolar
transistor. It is made by using gallium arsenide. The electron mobility of gallium
arsenide is five to seven times that of silicon. The GaAs FET is different from the
MOSFET by the use of schottky barrier at the gate instead of an oxide layer. GaAs FET
are called “Normally ON” type device, the maximum gate voltage must be zero. The
design of microwave circuits includes active components GaAs MESFET’s and GaAs
or InP based MOD-FET’s. Small Signal Model (SSM’s) are used as a building block
for large signal modeling nonlinear circuits like power amplifiers, mixers, oscillators,
etc., There are equivalent circuit elements which required if small signal broadband
behavior of microwave and millimeter wave FET’s has to be modeled. Optimization is
done by using nonlinear dynamic. The FET is fabricated on a semi insulating sub-
strate, which serves as the transistor support. An epitaxial layer of N-doped semi-
conductor material is deposited on top of the substrate, and practically the FET is built
into epitaxial layer. The FET’s ports are source, gate and drain. The source is at one
end of the transistor, and the drain is at other end. We connect positive voltage to the
drain, and electrons are drawn from the source to the drain. The gate is between the
source and drain on the surface of the epitaxial layer. Microwave FET is constructed
from a metal to semiconductor junction (Schottky junction) at the gate. Another name
to microwave FET is MESFET (gate is a metal to semiconductor junction). FET
300 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

semiconductor material is GaAs and silicon not recommended since electrons travel
twice as fast in GaAs as in silicon. Better high frequency performance is obtained in
GaAs FET. Microwave FETs are made with GaAs and called GaAs FETs. When the
source to gate voltage is zero, the electrons move through the entire thickness of the
epitaxial layer and the FET draws the maximum current, saturated drain to source
current IDSS. A microwave FET operated with its gate voltage negative with respect to
its source voltage. A reversed biased Schottky junction is formed around the gate.
Increasing the negative voltage on the gate causes the size of the insulating barrier
region increases, and reducing the current flow from the source to the drain. If the gate
voltage is negative enough, the insulating region around the gate extend across the
entire epitaxial layer and cut off the current flow. FET amplification is performing
because a small voltage applied to the gate controls a large amount of current which
flowing through the transistor. This current used to generate a large voltage in the
output circuit. We interested on the properties of a GaAs MESFET. A linear amplifier
circuit biases the GaAs MESFET. Considering gate bias alone, the range must be from
IDSS, VG = 0 to IDS = 0 at pinch off, VG = VP. FET square law characteristic is done
according to the formula ID ¼ IDSS  ð1  VVGSP Þ2 . In this range, the voltage VDS between
the drain and the source has little effect on the current IDS flowing through the channel.
By changing the gate voltage, VG, the drain to source current can be controlled. There
is a transfer characteristic of a GaAs FET with n channels. This FET transfer char-
acteristic is an important basic parameter in circuit design because it sets the bias
conditions and operating point. The operating point line is directly related to the
mutual conductance gm. Mutual conductance is defined as the ratio of the change in
direct current to the minor change in voltage between gate sources. We differentiate ID
@ID
expression with respect to VGS: gm ¼ @V GS
¼ 2  IDSS  ð1  VVGSP Þ  ð V1P Þ ¼
2IDSS
VP  ð1  VVGSP Þ. The most important characteristic when designing a bias circuit for
small signal GaAs FETs is transfer characteristic. There are two methods to bias a
GaAs FET: dual power source method and self-bias method (Auto-bias) [37, 62].
Dual power source: VP \VGS \0 must always apply to a GaAs FET, and we get
qffiffiffiffiffiffi
the expression for VGS, VGS ¼ VP  ð1  IDSS ID
Þ.

Fig. 3.3 FET dual source


bias and FET self (auto) bias
method
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 301

Self-bias method (Auto-Bias): This is the most universal method for reducing
electrical potential between a gate and the source when there is only one power
source. If the source resistance is RS, and the operating current is ID, then the drop
in electric potential caused by RS is ID  RS and the actual electrical potential
between the gate and the source is VGS ¼ ID  RS . VGS is negative and the FET can
be turned on. We can get the value for RS:
qffiffiffiffiffiffi
RS ¼ VIDGS ¼  I1D  VP  ð1  IDSS
ID
Þ. We implement a system of RF FET typical
Band 2 amplifier. We have two bias voltages: VG < 0, VD > 0, input and output
capacitors Cin, Cout, Microwave RF source X(t) and series resistance Rin. The dual
power source bias method (VG < 0, VD > 0) is appropriate for use in higher fre-
quencies. When we connect the source to the ground terminal, source inductance
can be made relatively small. By using this method, higher gain can be obtained and
a lower noise factor anticipated in the higher frequencies. A large DC voltage is
applied between the source and the drain, and the drain is positive with respect to
the source. The gate is biased at a DC negative voltage, which shows IDS as a
function of the gate voltage, current flows through the FET and through RD drain
resistor. In the FET none of the transistor current flows into the gate circuit, because
the gate junction is reverse biased. In a bipolar transistor, a small of the emitter
current flows into the base. The current flowing from the drain to the source, which
is opposite to electron current flow. The gate length determines the transit time of
the FET. The increased power is obtained by using multiple sources, gates, and
drains. We consider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |fX(t)|  1 and
A0  |fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 .
Remark: The Microwave applications implementation for GaAs FET is rec-
ommended since it has a greatest advantage in the higher frequency band. GaAs
FETs are far better in term of noise, gain and output power saturation characteristics
compare to silicon bipolar transistor and tunnel diodes. Most small signal FETs are
in low noise amplifiers. They are used over the horizon microwave

Fig. 3.4 FET amplifier with microwave source X(t)


302 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

communications, and in earth stations communicating with satellites. A low noise


amplifier is designed by minimizing the noise measure (M) which can show by the
expression M ¼ NF1
1 1
. NF is the amplifier noise factor and G is the amplifier gain.
G
The input output impedances of a GaAs FET, there is a difference in impedance
between maximum gain and minimum NF (Noise Figure). This difference is par-
ticularly apparent at lower frequencies. As the frequencies go higher, the difference
seems to decrease. The NF (Noise Factor) will be low when the gain is maximized
at high frequencies. The Noise Factor (NF) is a function of device gain. There are
two possible equivalent circuit topologies for FET small signal modeling analysis.
The first equivalent circuit topology is present in the below figure. For FET pad
capacitance we define Cpgs, Cpds. Rg, Rs, and Rd are FET ports resistances
respectively. Lg, Ls, and Ld are FET ports inductances respectively. Cgd is the
capacitance between the gate and the drain. Cds is the capacitance between the drain
and the source. Cgs is the capacitance between the gate and the source. Ri is the FET
input resistance. The second equivalent circuit topology 19 parameters small signal
equivalent circuit topology that is implemented in our analysis. The broad band
modeling of millimeter wave FET’s requires that the parasitic elements such as pad
capacitances Cpgs, Cpds, and Cpgd are taken into account. Additionally high per-
formance devices such as InP-based MODFET’s often have rather leaky gates, the
reverse currents of which must be modeled by the resistances Rgs, and Rgd. All
other FET parameters are the same like in the first equivalent circuit.
We define circuit node in below schematic as A1, A2 …

Fig. 3.5 Small signal equivalent circuit of FET


3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 303

Fig. 3.6 Small signal enhance equivalent circuit for FET (version 1)

The above FET equivalent circuits are for high frequency model and operation,
taking the node capacitors and other elements into account. If we switch to low
frequency small signal FET model, all capacitors in the above model disconnected
and all inductors are short. Capacitor impedance is Zc ¼ xC
1
; lim Zc ) lim xC
1
!
x!e x!e
1 and for inductance impedance is Zl ¼ x  L Zl ¼ x  L ) lim x  L ! e. We get
x!e
the low frequency small signal FET model.

Fig. 3.7 Small signal enhance equivalent circuit for FET (version 2)
304 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

Table 3.2 Small signal FET model parameters (JFET, MOSFET)


Parameter JFET MOSFET
gm 0.1–10 mA/V 0.1–20 mA/V or more
Rds 0.1–1 MΩ 1–50 KΩ
Cds 0.1–1 pF 0.1–1 pF
Cgs, Cgd 1–10 pF 1–10 pF
Rgs >108 Ω >1010 Ω
Rgd >108 Ω >1010 Ω

Fig. 3.8 Small signal equivalent circuit for FET (Rgs and Rgd disconnected)

More restricted low frequency small signal FET model is taking Rs, Rg, and Rd
small and we neglect them. The range of parameter values for an FET is present in
the below table:
Rgs and Rgd are high resistance elements which can be taken as disconnected in
our low frequency small signal model.
A High-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT), also known as hetero-structure
FET (HFET) or modulation-doped FET (MODFET), is a field-effect transistor
incorporating a junction between two materials with different band gaps (i.e. a
hetero-junction) as the channel instead of a doped region (as is generally the case
for MOSFET). A commonly used material combination is GaAs with AlGaAs,
though there is wide variation, dependent on the application of the device. Devices
incorporating more indium generally show better high-frequency performance,
while in recent years, gallium nitride HEMTs have attracted attention due to their
high-power performance. HEMT transistors are able to operate at higher frequen-
cies than ordinary transistors, up to millimeter wave frequencies, and are used in
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 305

high-frequency products. The minimum, maximum and optimal values for each
parameter of the model used for PHEMT SSM (Small Signal Model) Optimization
([62], Fundamental theory and applications, Vol. 43, No. 10, October 1996) is
describe in the below table. Femtofarads (1 fF = 0.001 pF = 10−15 F). Ω—Ohm.
The unit for the conductance (g) is defined by S ¼ X1 ¼ A=V (A—ampere, V—
voltage). Mho is an alternative name of the same unit, the reciprocal of one ohm.
Mho is derived from spelling ohm backwards and is written with an upside-down
capital Greek letter Omega [62].
We do our circuit analysis only for second equivalent circuit topology (full
version) which is high frequency model and good for Input microwave source X(t).
id ¼ gm  v  ejxTau ; lim id ¼ gm  v; lim ejxTau ¼ 1. We describe our circuit
Tau!e Tau!e
nodes Kirchhoff’s current law and elements equations in the below tables.
P
n
Ik ¼ 0; n is the total number of branches with currents flowing towards or
k¼1
away from the node.

Table 3.3 PHEMT SSM No. Parameter Minimum Maximum Optimal


(Small Signal Model)
parameters, minimum, 1 Lg[nH] 0.005 0.5 0.0479
maximum and optimal values 2 Rg[Ω] 0.5 50 7.97
3 Ls[nH] 0.005 0.5 0.011
4 Rs[Ω] 0.5 50 2.68
5 Ld[nH] 0.005 0.5 0.0257
6 Rd[Ω] 0.5 50 4.14
7 Cpgs[fF] 1 100 24.5
8 Cpds[fF] 1 100 18.2
9 Cpgd[fF] 1 100 3.01
10 Rgs[MΩ] 5 500 394
11 Cgs[fF] 10 1000 86.4
12 Ri[Ω] 0.5 50 1.55
13 Rgd[MΩ] 5 500 485
14 Cgd[fF] 1 100 18.8
15 Rdi[Ω] 0.5 50 10.4
16 gm[mS] 10 1000 65.8
17 s [ps] 0.001 0.1 0.0977
18 Rds[Ω] 10 1000 227
19 Cds[fF] 1 100 30.8
306 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

Table 3.4 PHEMT SSM (Small Signal Model) circuit nodes and Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL)
Circuit node P
n
Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL) - Ik ¼ 0
k¼1
A1 IRin ¼ ICin
A2 VA2 ¼ Vg
A3 ILg ¼ ICpgd þ IRg þ ICpgs
A4 IRg ¼ IRgs þ ICgs þ IRgd þ ICgd
A5 ICgs ¼ IRi
A6 ICgd ¼ IRdi
A7 IRgd þ IRdi ¼ IRd þ IRds þ ICds þ gm  v
A8 IRd þ ICpgd ¼ ILd þ ICpds
A9 IRgs þ ICgs þ gm  v þ ICds þ IRds ¼ IRs
A10 IRs ¼ ILs
A11 ILd þ IRd1 ¼ ICout ¼ IRL
A12 VA12 ¼ Vd

Below table describes circuit element and related equation.

Table 3.5 PHEMT SSM (Small Signal Model) circuit elements and elements related equations
Circuit Element related equation Circuit Element related equation
element element
Rin XðtÞVA1
Rin ¼ IRin Ri IRi ¼ VA5RV
i
A9

Cin ICin ¼ Cin  dtd ðVA1 þ Vg Þ Cds ICds ¼ Cds  dtd ðVA7  VA9 Þ
Lg Vg  VA3 ¼ Lg 
dILg
dt
Rds IRds ¼ VA7RV
ds
A9

Cpgs dVCpgs
ICpgs ¼ Cpgs  dt ¼ Cpgs  dVdtA3 Rd IRd ¼ VA7RV
d
A8

Cpgd ICpgd ¼ Cpgd  dtd ðVA3  VA8 Þ Cpds ICpds ¼ Cpds  dVdtA8
Rgd IRgd ¼ VA4RV
gd
A7 RS IRs ¼ VA9 V
RS
A10

Cgd ICgd ¼ Cgd  dtd ðVA4  VA6 Þ LS VA10 ¼ LS  dIdtLs


Rdi IRdi ¼ VA6RV
di
A7 Ld VA8  VA11 ¼ Ld  dIdtLd
Rg IRg ¼ VA3RV
g
A4 Rd1 IRd1 ¼ Vd V
Rd1
A11

Rgs IRgs ¼ VA4RV


gs
A9 Cout ICout ¼ Cout  dtd ðVA11  Vout Þ
Cgs ICgs ¼ Cgs  dv
dt ¼ Cgs  dt ðVA4  VA5 Þ
d RL IRL ¼ VRoutL
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 307

We have two methods to investigate our system fixed points.


Method A:
Vg and Vd are constant circuit biasing voltages Vg [ 0 ; Vd [ 0 ;
dVg
dt ¼ 0 ; dt ¼ 0
dVd

XðtÞ  VA1
¼ IRin ) XðtÞ  VA1 ¼ Rin  IRin ) VA1 ¼ XðtÞ  Rin  IRin
Rin
d dVA1 dVA1 1
ICin ¼ Cin  ðVA1 þ Vg Þ ) ICin ¼ Cin  ) ¼  ICin
dt dt dt Cin
dILg dILg 1
 Vg  VA3 ¼ Lg  ) ¼   ðVg þ VA3 Þ;
dt dt Lg
dVA3 dVA3 1
ICpgs ¼ Cpgs  ) ¼  ICpgs
dt dt Cpgs
d d 1
ICpgd ¼ Cpgd  ðVA3  VA8 Þ ) ðVA3  VA8 Þ ¼  ICpgd ;
dt dt Cpgd
VA4  VA7
IRgd ¼ ) VA4  VA7 ¼ IRgd  Rgd
Rgd
d d 1
ICgd ¼ Cgd  ðVA4  VA6 Þ ) ðVA4  VA6 Þ ¼  ICgd ;
dt dt Cgd
VA6  VA7
IRdi ¼ ) VA6  VA7 ¼ IRdi  Rdi
Rdi
VA3  VA4 VA4  VA9
IRg ¼ ) VA3  VA4 ¼ IRg  Rg ; IRgs ¼ ) VA4  VA9 ¼ IRgs  Rgs ;
Rg Rgs
dv dv 1
ICgs ¼ Cgs  ) ¼  ICgs
dt dt Cgs
VA5  VA9
IRi ¼ ) VA5  VA9 ¼ IRi  Ri ;
Ri
d d 1
ICds ¼ Cds  ðVA7  VA9 Þ ) ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼  ICds
dt dt Cds
VA7  VA9 VA7  VA8
IRds ¼ ) VA7  VA9 ¼ IRds  Rds ; IRd ¼ ) VA7  VA8 ¼ IRd  Rd
Rds Rd
dVA8 dVA8 1 VA9  VA10
ICpds ¼ Cpds  ) ¼  ICpds ; IRs ¼ ) VA9  VA10 ¼ IRs  RS
dt dt Cpds RS
dILs dILs 1 dILd dILd 1
VA10 ¼ LS  ) ¼  VA10 ; VA8  VA11 ¼ Ld  ) ¼  ðVA8  VA11 Þ
dt dt LS dt dt Ld

Vd  VA11
IRd1 ¼ ) Vd  VA11 ¼ IRd1  Rd1 ) VA11 ¼ Vd  IRd1  Rd1
Rd1
d d 1
ICout ¼ Cout  ðVA11  Vout Þ ) ðVA11  Vout Þ ¼  ICout ;
dt dt Cout
Vout
IRL ¼ ) Vout ¼ IRL  RL
RL
308 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

We do some mathematical manipulations:

dVA1 1 d½XðtÞ  Rin  IRin  1 dXðtÞ dIRin 1


¼  ICin ) ¼  ICin )  Rin  ¼  ICin
dt Cin dt Cin dt dt Cin
dXðtÞ dA0 dIRin 1
XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 ) ! e; ¼ 0; ¼  ICin ; IRin ¼ ICin
dt dt dt Cin  Rin
dIRin 1 dILg 1 dVA3 1
¼  IRin ; ¼   ðVg þ VA3 Þ; ¼  ICpgs
dt Cin  Rin dt Lg dt Cpgs

d 1 dVA3 dVA8 1
ðVA3  VA8 Þ ¼  ICpgd )  ¼  ICpgd
dt Cpgd dt dt Cpgd
dVA8 1 1
) ¼  ICpgs   ICpgd
dt Cpgs Cpgd
VA4  VA7 ¼ IRgd  Rgd & VA6  VA7 ¼ IRdi  Rdi ) VA4  VA6 ¼ IRgd  Rgd  IRdi  Rdi
d 1 d 1
ðVA4  VA6 Þ ¼  ICgd ) ðIRgd  Rgd  IRdi  Rdi Þ ¼  ICgd
dt Cgd dt Cgd
d 1 dIRgd dIRdi 1
ðIRgd  Rgd  IRdi  Rdi Þ ¼  ICgd ) Rgd   Rdi  ¼  ICgd
dt Cgd dt dt Cgd
VA3  VA4 ¼ IRg  Rg & VA4  VA9 ¼ IRgs  Rgs ) VA3  VA9 ¼ IRg  Rg þ IRgs  Rgs
dv 1 d
¼  ICgs ; VA5  VA9 ¼ IRi  Ri ; VA7  VA9 ¼ IRds  Rds & ðVA7  VA9 Þ
dt Cgs dt
1 dIRds 1
¼  ICds ) ¼  ICds
Cds dt Cds  Rds
dVA8 1 dILs 1
VA7  VA8 ¼ IRd  Rd ; VA9  VA10 ¼ IRs  RS ; ¼  ICpds ; ¼  VA10
dt Cpds dt LS

d 1 dVA3 dVA8 1
ðVA3  VA8 Þ ¼  ICpgd )  ¼
dt Cpgd dt dt Cpgd
dVA8 1 1
 ICpgd ) ¼  ICpgs   ICpgd
dt Cpgs Cpgd
VA4  VA7 ¼ IRgd  Rgd & VA6  VA7 ¼ IRdi  Rdi ) VA4  VA6 ¼ IRgd  Rgd  IRdi  Rdi
dILd 1
¼  ðVA8  VA11 Þ & VA11 ¼ Vd  IRd1
dt Ld
dILd 1
 Rd1 ) ¼  ðVA8  Vd þ IRd1  Rd1 Þ
dt Ld
d 1 d 1
ðVA11  Vout Þ ¼  ICout & Vout ¼ IRL  RL ) ðVA11  IRL  RL Þ ¼  ICout
dt Cout dt Cout
d 1 d 1
ðVA11  IRL  RL Þ ¼  ICout ) ðVd  IRd1  Rd1  IRL  RL Þ ¼  ICout
dt Cout dt Cout
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 309

d 1
ðVd  IRd1  Rd1  IRL  RL Þ ¼  ICout ;
dt Cout
dVd dIRd1 dIR 1
ICout ¼ IRL )   Rd1  L  RL ¼  IR L
dt dt dt Cout
dVd dIRd1 dIRL 1
¼0)  Rd1 þ  RL ¼ 
dt dt dt Cout
 IRL ; ILd þ IRd1 ¼ IRL ) IRd1 ¼ IRL  ILd
dðIRL  ILd Þ dIRL 1
 Rd1 þ  RL ¼   IRL
dt dt Cout
dIRL dILd dIRL 1
)  Rd1   Rd1 þ  RL ¼   IR L
dt dt dt Cout
dIRL dILd dIRL 1
 Rd1   Rd1 þ  RL ¼   IRL
dt dt dt Cout
dIRL dILd 1
)  ðRd1 þ RL Þ   Rd1 ¼   IR L
dt dt Cout

VA7  VA9 ¼ IRds  Rds ) VA9 ¼ VA7  IRds  Rds ;


VA9  VA10 ¼ IRs  RS ) VA10 ¼ VA9  IRs  RS
VA10 ¼ VA7  IRds  Rds  IRs  RS ; VA7 ¼ IRd  Rd þ VA8 ;
VA10 ¼ IRd  Rd þ VA8  IRds  Rds  IRs  RS
dILs 1 1
¼  VA10 ¼  ðIRd  Rd þ VA8  IRds  Rds  IRs  RS Þ
dt LS LS
dILs 1
¼  ðIRd  Rd þ VA8  IRds  Rds  ILs  RS Þ
dt LS
dIRL dILd 1
 ðRd1 þ RL Þ   Rd1 ¼   IRL
dt dt Cout
dIRL 1 dILd 1
) ¼ ½  Rd1   IRL 
dt ðRd1 þ RL Þ dt Cout
dIRL 1 1 1
¼  ½  ðVA8  Vd þ IRd1  Rd1 Þ  Rd1   IRL 
dt ðRd1 þ RL Þ Ld Cout

The condition to find our system fixed points is no variation with time for our
00 00
variables. d Variable
dt ¼ 0.

Table 3.6 Small signal equivalent circuit of FET system differential equations, fixed points and
outcome
System differential equation @ Fixed points Outcome

dt ¼  Cin Rin  IRin
dIRin 1
dt ¼ 0
dIRin IRin ¼0

dILg dILg ¼ Vg
dt ¼  Lg  ðVg þ VA3 Þ dt ¼ 0
1 VA3

dVA3
dt ¼ C1pgs  ICpgs dVA3
dt ¼0 ICpgs ¼0

dVA8
dt ¼ C1pgs  ICpgs  Cpgd
1
 ICpgd dVA8
dt ¼0 ICpgd
 ¼
Cpgd
ICpgs Cpgs
(continued)
310 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

Table 3.6 (continued)


System differential equation @ Fixed points Outcome

Rgd 
dIRgd
 Rdi  dIRdi
¼ 1
 ICgd
dIRgd
¼ 0; dIdtRdi ¼0 ICgd ¼0
dt dt Cgd dt

dv
dt ¼ C1gs  ICgs dv
dt ¼0 ICgs ¼0

dIRds
dt ¼ Cds1Rds  ICds dIRds
dt ¼0 ICds ¼0

dVA8
dt ¼ C1pds  ICpds dVA8
dt ¼0 ICpds ¼0

dILs
dt ¼ L1S  VA10 dILs
dt ¼0 VA10 ¼0
 
dILd
dt ¼ L1d  ðVA8  Vd þ IRd1  Rd1 Þ dILd
dt ¼0 VA8 þ IRd1  Rd1 ¼ Vd

 Rd1 þ
dIRL
 RL ¼  C1out  IRL
dIRL IRL ¼ 0
dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0
dIRd1 dIRd1
dt dt
  
dILs 1
dt ¼ 0
dILs
IRd  Rd þ VA8  IRds  Rds
¼  ðIRd  Rd þ VA8  IRds  Rds
dt LS 
ILs  RS ¼ 0
 ILs  RS Þ
 
dIRL
¼
1 1
 ½  ðVA8  Vd
dIRL
¼0
Rd1
Ld  ðVA8  Vd þ IRd1  Rd1 Þ ¼ 0
dt
dt ðRd1 þ RL Þ Ld
1
þ IRd1  Rd1 Þ  Rd1   IRL 
Cout

Method B:
dV
Vg and Vd are constant circuit biasing voltages Vg [ 0; Vd [ 0; dtg ¼ 0; dVdtd ¼ 0
XðtÞVA1
(1) KCL @ circuit node A1: Rin ¼ Cin  dtd ðVA1 þ Vg Þ.
(2) KCL @ circuit node A3: ILg ¼ Cpgd  dtd ðVA3  VA8 Þ þ VA3RV g
A4
þ Cpgs  dVdtA3 .
(3) KCL @ circuit node A4:
VA3 VA4 VA4 VA9 VA4 VA7
Rg ¼ Rgs þ Cgs  dv
dt þ Rgd þ C gd  d
dt ðV A4  VA6 Þ.
VA5 VA9
(4) KCL @ circuit node A5: Cgs  dv
dt ¼ Ri .
(5) KCL @ circuit node A6: Cgd  dtd ðVA4  VA6 Þ ¼ VA6RV
di
A7

(6) KCL @ circuit node A7:

VA4  VA7 VA6  VA7 VA7  VA8 VA7  VA9 d


þ ¼ þ þ Cds  ðVA7
Rgd Rdi Rd Rds dt
 VA9 Þ þ gm  v

VA7 VA8
(7) KCL @ circuit node A8: Rd þ Cpgd  dtd ðVA3  VA8 Þ ¼ ILd þ Cpds  dVdtA8
(8) KCL @ circuit node A9:

VA4  VA9 dv d VA7  VA9


þ Cgs  þ gm  v þ Cds  ðVA7  VA9 Þ þ
Rgs dt dt Rds
VA9  VA10
¼
Rs
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 311

VA9 VA10
(9) KCL @ circuit node A10: Rs ¼ ILs .
(10) KCL @ circuit node A11:

Vd  VA11 d Vout
ILd þ ¼ Cout  ðVA11  Vout Þ ¼
Rd1 dt RL
dILg dILs dILd
 Vg  VA3 ¼ Lg  ; VA10 ¼ LS  ; VA8  VA11 ¼ Ld 
dt dt dt
ILg ¼ Cpgd  dtd ðVA3  VA8 Þ þ VA3RV A4
þ Cpgs  dVA3
dt )
ð2Þ
g

ILg ¼ ½Cpgs þ Cpgd   dt  Cpgd  dt þ Rg  Rg


dVA3 dVA8 VA3 VA4

dVA8 dVA3 VA3 VA4


Cpgd  ¼ ½Cpgs þ Cpgd    ILg þ  )
dt dt Rg Rg
dVA8 Cpgs dVA3 1 VA3 VA4
¼½ þ 1    ILg þ 
dt Cpgd dt Cpgd Cpgd  Rg Cpgd  Rg

VA7  VA8 d dVA8


ð7Þ þ Cpgd  ðVA3  VA8 Þ ¼ ILd þ Cpds 
Rd dt dt
VA7  VA8 dVA3 dVA8 dVA8
þ Cpgd   ILd ¼ Cpds  þ Cpgd 
Rd dt dt dt
dVA8 VA7  VA8 Cpgd dVA3 1
¼ þ    ILd
dt Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd  dt ½Cpds þ Cpgd 
C
½Cpgd
pgs
þ 1  dVdtA3  C1pgd  ILg þ Cpgd Rg  Cpgd Rg
VA3 VA4
ð2Þ ¼ ð7Þ ! VA7 VA8 Cpgd
¼ Rd ½C pds þ Cpgd 
þ ½Cpds þ Cpgd   dt  ½Cpds þ Cpgd 
dVA3 1
 ILd

Cpgs Cpgd dVA3


f½ þ 1  g
Cpgd ½Cpds þ Cpgd  dt
VA7  VA8 1 1 VA3 VA4
¼   ILd þ  ILg  þ
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd  Cpgd Cpgd  Rg Cpgd  Rg

C C
We define for simplicity: CT1 ¼ Cpgd
pgs
 ½Cpds þpgdCpgd  þ 1

Cpgs Cpgd Cpgs  ½Cpds þ Cpgd  þ ½Cpds þ Cpgd   Cpgd  ½Cpgd 2


CT1 ¼  þ1 ¼
Cpgd ½Cpds þ Cpgd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   Cpgd
Cpgs  Cpds þ Cpgs  Cpgd þ Cpds  Cpgd
CT1 ¼
½Cpds þ Cpgd   Cpgd
312 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

Cpgs  Cpds þ Cpgs  Cpgd þ Cpds  Cpgd dVA3


f g
½Cpds þ Cpgd   Cpgd dt
VA7  VA8 1 1 VA3 VA4
¼   ILd þ  ILg  þ
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd  Cpgd Cpgd  Rg Cpgd  Rg

dVA3 VA7  VA8 1 1


¼   ILd þ  ILg
dt Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Cpgd  CT1
VA3 VA4
 þ
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1

XðtÞ  VA1 d XðtÞ  VA1


¼ Cin  ðVA1 þ Vg Þ )
Rin dt Rin
dVA1 dVg dVg
ð1Þ ¼ Cin   Cin  ; ¼0
dt dt dt
dVA1 XðtÞ  VA1
¼ :
dt Rin  Cin

VA3  VA4 VA4  VA9 dv VA4  VA7


¼ þ Cgs  þ
Rg Rgs dt Rgd
d dv VA5  VA9
ð3Þ þ Cgd  ðVA4  VA6 Þ; Cgs  ¼
dt dt Ri
VA3  VA4 VA4  VA9 VA5  VA9 VA4  VA7 d
¼ þ þ þ Cgd  ðVA4  VA6 Þ
Rg Rgs Ri Rgd dt

d VA3  VA4 ðVA4  VA9 Þ ðVA5  VA9 Þ ðVA4  VA7 Þ


Cgd  ðVA4  VA6 Þ ¼   
dt Rg Rgs Ri Rgd
dVA4 dVA6 VA3  VA4 ðVA4  VA9 Þ ðVA5  VA9 Þ ðVA4  VA7 Þ
¼ þ   
dt dt Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Ri Cgd  Rgd

d VA6  VA7 dVA4 dVA6 VA6  VA7


ð5Þ Cgd  ðVA4  VA6 Þ ¼ ) ¼ þ
dt Rdi dt dt Cgd  Rdi
(3) = (5) →

VA3  VA4 ðVA4  VA9 Þ ðVA5  VA9 Þ ðVA4  VA7 Þ VA6  VA7
   ¼
Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Ri Cgd  Rgd Cgd  Rdi

dv VA5  VA9 dv VA5  VA9


ð4Þ Cgs  ¼ ) ¼
dt Ri dt Cgs  Ri
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 313

VA4  VA7 VA6  VA7 VA7  VA8 VA7  VA9 d


ð6Þ þ ¼ þ þ Cds  ðVA7
Rgd Rdi Rd Rds dt
 VA9 Þ þ gm  v

d VA4  VA7 VA6  VA7 ðVA7  VA8 Þ ðVA7  VA9 Þ


Cds  ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼ þ    gm
dt Rgd Rdi Rd Rds
v

VA4  VA9 dv d VA7  VA9


ð8Þ þ Cgs  þ gm  v þ Cds  ðVA7  VA9 Þ þ
Rgs dt dt Rds
VA9  VA10
¼
Rs

dv VA5  VA9 VA4  VA9 VA5  VA9 d


Cgs  ¼ ; þ þ gm  v þ Cds  ðVA7
dt Ri Rgs Ri dt
VA7  VA9
 VA9 Þ þ
Rds
VA9  VA10
¼
Rs

d VA9  VA10 ðVA4  VA9 Þ ðVA5  VA9 Þ ðVA7  VA9 Þ


Cds  ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼   
dt Rs Rgs Ri Rds
 gm  v

(6) = (8) →
VA4  VA7 VA6  VA7 ðVA7  VA8 Þ
þ 
Rgd Rdi Rd
VA9  VA10 ðVA4  VA9 Þ ðVA5  VA9 Þ
¼  
Rs Rgs Ri
We can summery our last results (circuit node voltages equations) in the below
table:

Table 3.7 Small signal equivalent circuit of FET nodes KCL and circuit nodes voltages equations
Nodes Circuit node voltages equation
KCL
(3) = (5) VA3 VA4
Cgd Rg  ðVCA4gdVA9 Þ ðVA5 VA9 Þ ðVA4 VA7 Þ VA6 VA7
Rgs  Cgd Ri  Cgd Rgd ¼ Cgd Rdi
(*)
(6) = (8) VA4 VA7
Rgd þ VA6 VA7
Rdi  ðVA7RV
d
A8 Þ
¼ VA9 V
Rs
A10
 ðVA4RV
gs
A9 Þ
 ðVA5RV
i
A9 Þ

(**)
314 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

dILs VA9  VA10 LS d


VA10 ¼ LS  ; IRs ¼ ILs ; IRs ¼ ; VA10 ¼  ðVA9  VA10 Þ
dt RS RS dt
dILg dILg 1
 Vg  VA3 ¼ Lg  ) ¼   ðVg þ VA3 Þ ;
dt dt Lg
dILd dILd 1
VA8  VA11 ¼ Ld  ) ¼  ðVA8  VA11 Þ
dt dt Ld
Vd  VA11 Vout ðVd  VA11 Þ  RL
ILd þ ¼ ) Vout ¼ ILd  RL þ ;
Rd1 RL Rd1
Vd  VA11 d
ILd þ ¼ Cout  ðVA11  Vout Þ
Rd1 dt

ðVd  VA11 Þ  RL
Vout ¼ ILd  RL þ ) Vout  VA11
Rd1
ðVd  VA11 Þ  RL
¼ ILd  RL þ  VA11
Rd1
ðVd þ VA11 Þ  RL
VA11  Vout ¼ ILd  RL þ þ VA11 ;
Rd1
d dVA11 dVd
ðVA11  Vd Þ ¼ ; ¼0
dt dt dt
dVA11 dVout dILd RL d dVA11
 ¼  RL þ  ðVA11  Vd Þ þ
dt dt dt Rd1 dt dt

d dILd RL dVA11 dILd 1


ðVA11  Vout Þ ¼   RL þ ½ þ 1  ; ¼  ½VA8  VA11 
dt dt Rd1 dt dt Ld
d RL RL dVA11
ðVA11  Vout Þ ¼   ½VA8  VA11  þ ½ þ 1 
dt Ld Rd1 dt
Vd  VA11 d Vd  VA11
ILd þ ¼ Cout  ðVA11  Vout Þ ) ILd þ
Rd1 dt Rd1
RL dVA11 RL
¼ Cout  f½ þ 1    ½VA8  VA11 g
Rd1 dt Ld
RL dVA11 Vd  VA11 RL
Cout  ½ þ 1  ¼ ILd þ þ Cout   ½VA8  VA11 
Rd1 dt Rd1 Ld
dVA11 1 Vd
¼  ILd þ
dt Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1  Rd1
VA11 RL
 þ RL  ½VA8  VA11 
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1  Rd1 ½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
RL
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 315

dVA11 1 Vd RL
¼  ILd þ þ  VA8
dt Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1  Rd1 ½RRd1L þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ   RL  VA11
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1

We can summery our system new differential equations representation:

dVA3 VA7  VA8 1 1


¼   ILd þ  ILg
dt Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Cpgd  CT1
VA3 VA4
 þ
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1

d VA6  VA7 dv 1 ðVA5  VA9 Þ


ðVA4  VA6 Þ ¼ ; ¼ 
dt Cgd  Rdi dt Cgs Ri
d VA4  VA7 VA6  VA7 ðVA7  VA8 Þ ðVA7  VA9 Þ gm
ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼ þ    v
dt Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rds Cds

dILs VA9  VA10 d


VA10 ¼ LS  ; ¼ ILs ) ðVA9  VA10 Þ
dt Rs dt
Rs dILg 1
¼  VA10 ; ¼   ðVg þ VA3 Þ
LS dt Lg
dILd 1
¼  ðVA8  VA11 Þ
dt Ld

dVA11 1 Vd RL
¼  ILd þ þ RL  VA8
dt Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1
R L
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1  Rd1 ½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
RL

RL 1 1
½ þ   VA11
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1

We need to find our system fixed points. First we analyze our circuit node
voltages equations.

VA3  VA4 ðVA4  VA9 Þ ðVA5  VA9 Þ ðVA4  VA7 Þ VA6  VA7
ð Þ    ¼
Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Ri Cgd  Rgd Cgd  Rdi
VA3 VA4 VA4 VA9 VA5 VA9 VA4
  þ  þ 
Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Ri Cgd  Ri Cgd  Rgd
VA7 VA6 VA7
þ ¼ 
Cgd  Rgd Cgd  Rdi Cgd  Rdi
316 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

VA3 1 1 1 VA5 VA6


 VA4  f þ þ g 
Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Rgd Cgd  Ri Cgd  Rdi
1 1 1 1
þ VA7  f þ g þ VA9  f þ g¼0
Cgd  Rdi Cgd  Rgd Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Ri

VA3 1 1 1 VA5 VA6


 VA4  f þ þ g 
Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Rgd Cgd  Ri Cgd  Rdi
1 1
þ VA7  f þ g þ VA8  0 þ VA9
Cgd  Rdi Cgd  Rgd
1 1
f þ g þ VA10  0 ¼ 0
Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Ri

1 1 1 1
C11 ¼ ; C12 ¼ f þ þ g; C13
Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rg Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Rgd
1 1
¼ ; C14 ¼ 
Cgd  Ri Cgd  Rdi

1 1 1 1
C15 ¼ þ ; C16 ¼ 0; C17 ¼ þ ; C18
Cgd  Rdi Cgd  Rgd Cgd  Rgs Cgd  Ri
X
8
¼ 0; C1k  VAk þ 2 ¼ 0
k¼1

VA4  VA7 VA6  VA7 ðVA7  VA8 Þ


ðÞ þ 
Rgd Rdi Rd
VA9  VA10 ðVA4  VA9 Þ ðVA5  VA9 Þ
¼  
Rs Rgs Ri

VA4 VA7 VA6 VA7 VA7 VA8 VA9 VA10 VA4 VA9 VA5 VA9
 þ   þ ¼   þ  þ
Rgd Rgd Rdi Rdi Rd Rd Rs Rs Rgs Rgs Ri Ri

1 1 VA5 VA6 1 1 1 VA8


VA4  ð þ Þþ þ  VA7  f þ þ gþ  VA9
Rgd Rgs Ri Rdi Rgd Rdi Rd Rd
1 1 1 VA10
f þ þ gþ
Rs Rgs Ri Rs
¼0

1 1 VA5 VA6 1 1 1
VA3  0 þ VA4  ð þ Þþ þ  VA7  f þ þ g
Rgd Rgs Ri Rdi Rgd Rdi Rd
VA8 1 1 1 VA10
þ  VA9  f þ þ gþ ¼0
Rd Rs Rgs Ri Rs
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 317

1 1 1 1
C21 ¼ 0; C22 ¼ þ ; C23 ¼ ; C24 ¼ ;
Rgd Rgs Ri Rdi
1 1 1 1
C25 ¼ f þ þ g; C26 ¼
Rgd Rdi Rd Rd

1 1 1 1 X 8
C27 ¼ f þ þ g; C28 ¼ ; C2k  VAk þ 2 ¼ 0
Rs Rgs Ri Rs k¼1

ðÞðÞ
X
8 X
8 X
8
C1k  VAk þ 2  C2k  VAk þ 2 ¼ 0; C1k  VAk þ 2
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
X
8 X
8
 C2k  VAk þ 2 ¼ ðC1k  C2k Þ  VAk þ 2
k¼1 k¼1

VA3  C11 þ VA4  ðC12  C22 Þ þ VA5  ðC13  C23 Þ þ VA6  ðC14  C24 Þ þ VA7  ðC15  C25 Þ
 VA8  C26 þ VA9  ðC17  C27 Þ  VA10  C28 ¼ 0

At fixed points:

dVA3 d dv d
¼ 0 ; ðVA4  VA6 Þ ¼ 0 ; ¼ 0 ; ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt
d dILg dILd dVA11
ðVA9  VA10 Þ ¼ 0 ; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼0
dt dt dt dt

Fixed points: E  ¼ ðVA3


 
; . . .; VA11 
; ILd 
; ILg ; v Þ
 
VA7  VA8 1 1
  I þ  I
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
 
VA3 VA4
 þ
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1
¼0
       
VA6  VA7 ¼ 0; VA5  VA9 ¼ 0; VA10 ¼ 0; VA3 ¼ Vg ; VA8  VA11 ¼0
 
VA4 VA6  1 1 1 1
þ  VA7 ½    
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rds
 
VA8 VA9 gm 
þ þ  v ¼0
Cds  Rd Cds  Rds Cds
318 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

1 Vd RL
 I þ þ
Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1  Rd1 ½RRd1L þ 1  Ld
 RL 1 1
 VA8 ½ þ   RL  V ¼ 0
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½R þ 1 A11
d1

We can minimize the above fixed points equations:


 
VA7  VA8 1  1
  ILd þ
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Cpgd  CT1

 Vg VA4
 ILg þ þ
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1
¼0

VA4  1 1 1 1
 VA7 ½ þ þ þ
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rds
 
1 VA8 VA9 gm 
 þ þ  v
Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rds Cds
¼0

1  Vd  RL
 ILd þ þ VA8  f RL
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1
RL
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1  Rd1
RL
½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ  g
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
¼0

X
8
       
VA6 ¼ VA7 ; VA5 ¼ VA9 ; VA10 ¼ 0; VA3 ¼ Vg ; VA8 ¼ VA11 ; C1k VAk þ 2
k¼1
X
8
¼ 0; C2k  VAk þ 2 ¼ 0
k¼1

3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave


Frequencies Stability Analysis

In Sect. 3.2, we present FET system’s differential equations representation:

dVA3 VA7  VA8 1 1


¼   ILd þ  ILg
dt Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Cpgd  CT1
VA3 VA4
 þ
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 319

d VA6  VA7 dv 1 ðVA5  VA9 Þ


ðVA4  VA6 Þ ¼ ; ¼ 
dt Cgd  Rdi dt Cgs Ri
d VA4  VA7 VA6  VA7 ðVA7  VA8 Þ ðVA7  VA9 Þ gm
ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼ þ    v
dt Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rds Cds

dILs VA9  VA10 d


VA10 ¼ LS  ; ¼ ILs ) ðVA9  VA10 Þ
dt Rs dt
Rs dILg 1
¼  VA10 ; ¼   ðVg þ VA3 Þ
LS dt Lg
dILd 1
¼  ðVA8  VA11 Þ
dt Ld

dVA11 1 Vd RL
¼  ILd þ þ  VA8
dt Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1  Rd1 ½RRd1L þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ   RL  VA11
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1

We need to discuss its stability analysis under parameter variation.


dI
We derivate the first equation dVdtA3 ¼    ; dIdtLd ¼ L1d  ðVA8  VA11 Þ; dtLg ¼
 L1g  ðVg þ VA3 Þ

d 2 VA3 d VA7  VA8 1 1


¼ f   ILd þ  ILg
dt2 dt Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Cpgd  CT1
VA3 VA4
 þ g
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1

d 2 VA3 1 dðVA7  VA8 Þ


¼ 
dt 2 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 dt
1 dILd 1 dILg
  þ 
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 dt Cpgd  CT1 dt
1 dVA3 1 dVA4
  þ 
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 dt Cpgd  Rg  CT1 dt

dILg
Inserting expressions: dILd
dt ¼ ; dt ¼ 
320 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

d 2 VA3 1 dðVA7  VA8 Þ 1


¼  
dt 2 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 dt ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1 1
  ðVA8  VA11 Þ    ðVg þ VA3 Þ
Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 dVA3 1 dVA4
  þ 
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 dt Cpgd  Rg  CT1 dt

d 2 VA3 1 dðVA7  VA8 Þ 1


  þ
dt2 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 dt ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1 1
  ðVA8  VA11 Þ þ   ðVg þ VA3 Þ
Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 dVA3 1 dVA4
þ    ¼0
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 dt Cpgd  Rg  CT1 dt

d 2 VA3 1 dVA7 1
  þ
dt2 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 dt Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
dVA8 1 1
 þ   VA8
dt ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
   VA11 þ 
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1 1 dVA3
 Vg þ   VA3 þ 
Cpgd  CT1 Lg Cpgd  Rg  CT1 dt
1 dVA4
  ¼0
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 dt

d 2 VA3
We define the following new variables: dVA3
dt ¼ Y1 ; dt2 ¼ dYdt1 ; dVA4
dt ¼ Y2

dVA7 dVA8
¼ Y3 ; ¼ Y4
dt dt
dY1 1 1
  Y3 þ
dt Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1
 Y4 þ   VA8
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1 1
   VA11 þ   Vg þ
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg Cpgd  CT1
1 1 1
  VA3 þ  Y1   Y2 ¼ 0
Lg Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 321

dY1 1 1
¼  Y3 
dt Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1
 Y4    VA8
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
þ   VA11    Vg
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1 1
   VA3   Y1
Cpgd  CT1 Lg Cpgd  Rg  CT1
1
þ  Y2
Cpgd  Rg  CT1

We need to derivative equation: dVA11


dt ¼    ; dIdtLd ¼ L1d  ðVA8  VA11 Þ ; dVd
dt ¼0

dVA11 1 Vd RL
¼  ILd þ þ
dt Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1  Rd1 ½RRd1L þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
 VA8  ½ þ   VA11
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1

d 2 VA11 1 dILd RL
¼  þ RL
dt2 Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 dt ½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
dVA8 RL 1 1 dVA11
 ½ þ  
dt Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1 dt
d1

d 2 VA11 1 1 RL
¼   ðVA8  VA11 Þ þ RL
dt2 Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld ½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
dVA8 RL 1 1 dVA11
 ½ þ   RL 
dt Ld Cout  Rd1 ½R þ 1 dt
d1

d 2 VA11
We define the following new variables: dVA8
dt ¼ Y4 ; dVA11
dt ¼ Y5 ; dt2 ¼ dYdt5

dY5 1 1 RL RL 1
¼   ðVA8  VA11 Þ þ RL  Y4  ½ þ 
dt Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
½Rd1 þ 1  Ld Ld Cout  Rd1
1
 RL  Y5
½Rd1 þ 1

dY5 1 1 1 1 RL
¼   VA8    VA11 þ RL  Y4
dt Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ   Y5
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
322 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

We need to derivative equation: dt ðVA7


d
 VA9 Þ ¼    ; dv
dt ¼ C1gs  ðVA5RV
i
A9 Þ

d VA4  VA7 VA6  VA7 ðVA7  VA8 Þ ðVA7  VA9 Þ gm


ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼ þ    v
dt Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rds Cds

d2 d VA4  VA7 VA6  VA7 ðVA7  VA8 Þ ðVA7  VA9 Þ gm


ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼ f þ   
dt2 dt Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rds Cds
 vg

d2 1 dVA4 1 1 dVA7
ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼    
dt 2 Cds  Rgd dt Cds  Rgd dt dt
1 dVA6 1 dVA7
þ   
Cds  Rdi dt Cds  Rdi dt
1 dVA7 1 dVA8 1 dVA7
  þ   
Cds  Rd dt Cds  Rd dt Cds  Rds dt
1 dVA9 gm dv
þ   
Cds  Rds dt Cds dt

d2 1 dVA4 1 1 dVA7 1 dVA6 1 dVA7


ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼     þ   
dt2 Cds  Rgd dt Cds  Rgd dt dt Cds  Rdi dt Cds  Rdi dt
1 dVA7 1 dVA8 1 dVA7 1 dVA9 gm 1 ðVA5  VA9 Þ
  þ    þ    
Cds  Rd dt Cds  Rd dt Cds  Rds dt Cds  Rds dt Cds Cgs Ri

d2 1 dVA9 dVA7 1 dVA4 1 dVA6


ðVA7  VA9 Þ ¼ ½  þ  þ 
dt2 Cds  Rds dt dt Cds  Rgd dt Cds  Rdi dt
dVA7 1 1 1 1 dVA8 gm 1 VA5
 ½ þ þ þ    
dt Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rd dt Cds Cgs Ri
gm 1 VA9
þ  
Cds Cgs Ri

We define the following new variables: dVA6


dt ¼ Y6 ; Y7 ¼ dVdtA9  dVdtA7 ; dVA7
dt ¼ Y3

dVA9 dVA9
Y7 ¼  Y3 ) ¼ Y7 þ Y 3
dt dt
dY7 1 1 1
¼  Y7 þ  Y2 þ  Y 6  Y3
dt Cds  Rds Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi
1 1 1
½ þ þ 
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd
1 gm 1 VA5 gm 1 VA9
þ  Y4    þ  
Cds  Rd Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 323

We can summery our system new differential equations representation:

dVA3 dVA4 dVA7 dVA8


¼ Y1 ¼ f1 ðY1 Þ; ¼ Y2 ¼ f3 ðY2 Þ; ¼ f4 ðY3 Þ ¼ Y3 ; ¼ f5 ðY4 Þ ¼ Y4
dt dt dt dt

dY1 1
¼ f2 ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; VA3 ; VA8 ; VA11 Þ ¼
dt Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1
 Y3   Y4
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1 1 1
   VA8 þ   VA11
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
   Vg    VA3
Cpgd  CT1 Lg Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1
  Y1 þ  Y2
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1

dVA11 dY5 dVA6 dVA9


¼ f6 ðY5 Þ ¼ Y5 ; ¼ f7 ðVA8 ; VA11 ; Y4 ; Y5 Þ; ¼ f8 ðY6 Þ ¼ Y6 ;
dt dt dt dt
¼ f9 ðY7 ; Y3 Þ ¼ Y7 þ Y3

dY5 1 1 1 1 RL
¼   VA8    VA11 þ RL  Y4
dt Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ   Y5
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1

dY7 1 1 1
¼ f10 ðVA5 ; VA9 ; Y2 ; Y6 ; Y7 ; Y3 ; Y4 Þ ¼  Y7 þ  Y2 þ  Y6
dt Cds  Rds Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi
1 1 1 1
 Y3  ½ þ þ þ
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rd
gm 1 VA5 gm 1 VA9
 Y4    þ  
Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri

We have ten differential equations which represent our system.

dVA3 dY1 dVA4 dVA7


¼ f1 ðY1 Þ ; ¼ f2 ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; VA3 ; VA8 ; VA11 Þ ; ¼ f3 ðY2 Þ; ¼ f4 ðY3 Þ
dt dt dt dt
dVA8 dVA11 dY5 dVA6
¼ f5 ðY4 Þ ; ¼ f6 ðY5 Þ; ¼ f7 ðVA8 ; VA11 ; Y4 ; Y5 Þ ; ¼ f8 ðY6 Þ
dt dt dt dt
dVA9 dY7
¼ f9 ðY7 ; Y3 Þ ; ¼ f10 ðVA5 ; VA9 ; Y2 ; Y6 ; Y7 ; Y3 ; Y4 Þ
dt dt
324 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

@ Fixed points:
dVA3 dY1 dVA4 dVA7 dVA8
¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼0
dt dt dt dt dt
dVA11 dY5 dVA6 dVA9 dY7
¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼0
dt dt dt dt dt
Y1 ¼ 0 ; Y2 ¼ 0 ; Y3 ¼ 0 ; Y4 ¼ 0 ; Y5 ¼ 0 ; Y6 ¼ 0 ; Y7 ¼ 0
1 1 1 1
   V þ 
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld A8 ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
 1 1 1 1
 VA11    Vg    V ¼ 0
Cpgd  CT1 Lg Cpgd  CT1 Lg A3
1 1  1 1 
  VA8    VA11 ¼0
Cout  ½R þ 1 Ld
RL
d1
Cout  ½R þ 1 Ld
R L
d1
 
gm 1 VA5 gm 1 VA9
   þ   ¼0
Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of our system consists in adding to coordinates
½VA3 ; VA4 ; VA7 ; VA8 ; Y1 ; VA11 ; Y5 ; VA6 ; VA9 ; . . . arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential form ½vA3 ; vA4 ; vA7 ; vA8 ; y1 ; vA11 ; y5 ; vA6 ; vA9 ; . . .  ekt , and retaining the first
order terms in VA3 ; VA4 ; VA7 ; VA8 ; Y1 ; VA11 ; Y5 ; VA6 ; VA9 ; . . .. The system of homo-
geneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristics equation in the eigenvalues
λ . Our system fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½vA3 ; vA4 ; vA7 ; vA8 ; y1 ; vA11 ; y5 ; vA6 ; vA9 ; . . .  ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1
ðjÞ
(second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc. VA3 ðtÞ ¼ VA3 þ vA3  ekt ;
ðjÞ
VA4 ðtÞ ¼ VA4 þ vA4  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
VA7 ðtÞ ¼ VA7 þ vA7  ekt ; VA8 ðtÞ ¼ VA8 þ vA8  ekt ;
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; VA11 ðtÞ ¼ VA11 þ vA11  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y5 ðtÞ ¼ Y5 þ y5  ekt ; VA6 ðtÞ ¼ VA6 þ vA6  ekt ; VA9 ðtÞ ¼ VA9 þ vA9  ekt . . .:

We choose the above expressions for our VA3 ðtÞ; VA4 ðtÞ; VA7 ðtÞ; VA8 ðtÞ;
Y1 ðtÞ; VA11 ðtÞ; Y5 ðtÞ; VA6 ðtÞ; VA9 ðtÞ; . . . as small displacement ½vA3 ; vA4 ; vA7 ; vA8 ; y1 ;
vA11 ; y5 ; vA6 ; vA9 ; . . .
ðjÞ
from our system fixed points at time t = 0. VA3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA3 þ vA3 ;
ðjÞ
VA4 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA4 þ vA4
ðjÞ ðjÞ
VA7 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA7 þ vA7 ; VA8 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA8 þ vA8 ;
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ; VA11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA11 þ vA11
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y5 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y5 þ y5 ; VA6 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA6 þ vA6 ; VA9 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA9 þ vA9 . . .. . .
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 325

For λ < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise λ > 0, t > 0 is
unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for λ < 0, t > 0
otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. λ is the eigenvalue
parameter which is established if the fixed point is stable or unstable; additionally,
his absolute value |λ| establishes the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point (Yuri 1995; Jack and Huseyin 1991) [2–4]. The speeds of flow toward or
away from the selected fixed point for system variables derivatives with respect to
time are:

dVA3 ðtÞ dVA4 ðtÞ


¼ vA3  k  ekt ; ¼ vA4  k  ekt
dt dt
dVA7 ðtÞ dVA8 ðtÞ
¼ vA7  k  ekt ; ¼ vA8  k  ekt ;
dt dt
dY1 ðtÞ dVA11 ðtÞ
¼ y1  k  ekt ; ¼ vA11  k  ekt
dt dt
dY5 ðtÞ dVA6 ðtÞ dVA9 ðtÞ
¼ y5  k  ekt ; ¼ vA6  k  ekt ; ¼ vA9  k  ekt . . .
dt dt dt
dVA3 ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ Y1 ) vA3  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; @ fixed point Y1 ¼ 0
dt
ðjÞ dVA4 ðjÞ
Y1 ¼ 0 ; y1  vA3  k ¼ 0; ¼ Y2 ) vA4  k  ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt
dt
ðjÞ
@ fixed point Y2 ¼ 0; y2  vA4  k ¼ 0
dVA7 ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ Y3 ) vA7  k  ekt ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt @ fixed point Y3 ¼ 0
dt
dVA8 ðjÞ
y3  vA7  k ¼ 0 ; ¼ Y4 ) vA8  k  ekt ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt
dt
ðjÞ
@ fixed point Y4 ¼ 0 ) y4  vA8  k ¼ 0

dY1 1 1
¼  Y3   Y4
dt Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1 1 1
   VA8 þ 
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
 VA11    Vg    VA3
Cpgd  CT1 Lg Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1
  Y1 þ  Y2
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1
326 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

1 ðjÞ
y1  k  ekt ¼  ½Y3 þ y3  ekt 
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 ðjÞ
  ½Y4 þ y4  ekt 
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1 ðjÞ
   ½VA8 þ vA8  ekt 
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1
þ   ½VA11 þ vA11  ekt     Vg
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
   ½VA3 þ vA3  ekt    ½Y1 þ y1  ekt 
Cpgd  CT1 Lg Cpgd  Rg  CT1
1 ðjÞ
þ  ½Y2 þ y2  ekt 
Cpgd  Rg  CT1

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
y1  k  ekt ¼ f Y  Y
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 3 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ 1 1
  V þ  V    Vg
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld A8 ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld A11 Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
  V  Y þ Y g
Cpgd  CT1 Lg A3 Cpgd  Rg  CT1 1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1 2
1 1
 y3  ekt   y4  ekt
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1
   vA8  ekt
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
  vA11  ekt    vA3  ekt
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1
  y1  ekt þ  y2  ekt
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1

@ fixed point

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
f Y  Y
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 3 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ 1 1
   VA8 þ   VA11    Vg
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
  V  Y þ Y g¼0
Cpgd  CT1 Lg A3 Cpgd  Rg  CT1 1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1 2
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 327

1 1
y1  k  ekt ¼  y3  ekt 
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1
 y4  ekt    vA8  ekt
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
þ   vA11  ekt    vA3  ekt
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1
  y1  ekt þ  y2  ekt
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1

1 1
y1  k ¼  y3 
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1
 y4    vA8
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
þ   vA11  
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1
 vA3   y1 þ  y2
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1

1 1
 y3 
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1 1
 y4    vA8
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
þ   vA11  
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1
 vA3   y1 þ  y2  y 1  k ¼ 0
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1

ðjÞ ðjÞ
dVA11
dt ¼ Y5 ) vA11  k  ekt ¼ Y5 þ y5  ekt ; @ fixed point Y5 ¼ 0 ) vA11  k  ekt ¼
y5  ekt

dVA6
vA11  k  ekt ¼ y5  ekt ) y5  vA11  k ¼ 0; ¼ Y6 ) vA6  k  ekt
dt
ðjÞ
¼ Y6 þ y6  ekt

ðjÞ
@ fixed point Y6 ¼ 0 ) vA6  k  ekt ¼ y6  ekt ) y6  vA6  k ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
dt ¼ Y7 þ Y3
dVA9
) vA9  k  ekt ¼ Y7 þ y7  ekt þ Y3 þ y3  ekt @ fixed point
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y7 þ Y3 ¼ 0

vA9  k  ekt ¼ y7  ekt þ y3  ekt ) vA9  k ¼ y7 þ y3 ) y7 þ y3  vA9  k ¼ 0


328 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

dY5 1 1 1 1 RL
¼   VA8    VA11 þ RL  Y4
dt Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld ½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ   RL  Y5
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1

y5  k  ekt
RL ðjÞ RL 1 1 ðjÞ
þ  ½Y4 þ y4  ekt   ½ þ   RL  ½Y5 þ y5  ekt 
½RRd1L þ 1  Ld Ld Cout  Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1

1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ
y5  k  ekt ¼ f  V   V
Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld A8 Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld A11
RL ðjÞ RL 1 1 ðjÞ
þ Y ½ þ  Y g
½RRd1L þ 1  Ld 4 Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1 5
d1

1 1 1 1
þ   vA8  ekt  
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L

RL
 vA11  ekt þ RL  y4  ekt
½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ   y5  ekt
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1

1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ
f   VA8    VA11
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L

@ fixed point
RL ðjÞ RL 1 1 ðjÞ
þ Y ½ þ  Y g¼0
½RRd1L þ 1  Ld 4 Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1 5
d1

1 1 1 1 RL
y5  k ¼   vA8    vA11 þ RL  y4
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 d
RL L Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 d
RL L ½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ   RL  y5
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1

1 1 1 1 RL
  vA8    vA11 þ RL  y4
Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld ½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ   y5  y5  k ¼ 0
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 329

dY7 1 1 1
¼  Y7 þ  Y2 þ  Y6
dt Cds  Rds Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi
1 1 1 1
 Y3  ½ þ þ þ
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rd
gm 1 VA5 gm 1 VA9
 Y4    þ  
Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
y7  k  ekt ¼  ½Y7 þ y7  ekt  þ  ½Y2 þ y2  ekt 
Cds  Rds Cds  Rgd
1 ðjÞ
þ  ½Y6 þ y6  ekt 
Cds  Rdi
ðjÞ 1 1 1
 ½Y3 þ y3  ekt   ½ þ þ 
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd
1 ðjÞ
þ  ½Y4 þ y4  ekt 
Cds  Rd
ðjÞ ðjÞ
gm 1 ½VA5 þ vA5  ekt  gm 1 ½VA9 þ vA9  ekt 
   þ  
Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ


y7  k  ekt ¼ f  Y7 þ  Y2 þ Y
Cds  Rds Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi 6
ðjÞ 1 1 1 1 ðjÞ
 Y3  ½ þ þ þ Y
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd Cds  Rd 4
ðjÞ ðjÞ
gm 1 VA5 gm 1 VA9 1
   þ   gþ  y7  ekt
Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri Cds  Rds
1 1
þ  y2  ekt þ  y6  ekt
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi
1 1 1
½ þ þ   y3  ekt
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd
1 gm 1 gm 1
þ  y4  ekt    vA5  ekt þ   vA9  ekt
Cds  Rd Cds Cgs  Ri Cds Cgs  Ri

@ fixed point
330 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ ðjÞ


f Y þ Y þ  Y  Y3
Cds  Rds 7 Cds  Rgd 2 Cds  Rdi 6
1 1 1
½ þ þ 
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd
ðjÞ ðjÞ
1 ðjÞ gm 1 VA5 gm 1 VA9
þ  Y4    þ   g¼0
Cds  Rd Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri
1 1 1
y7  k ¼  y7 þ  y2 þ  y6
Cds  Rds Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi
1 1 1
½ þ þ   y3
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd
1 gm 1 gm 1
þ  y4    vA5 þ   vA9
Cds  Rd Cds Cgs  Ri Cds Cgs  Ri

1 1 1 1 1 1
 y7 þ  y2 þ  y6  ½ þ þ   y3
Cds  Rds Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd
1 gm 1 gm 1
þ  y4    vA5 þ   vA9  y7  k ¼ 0
Cds  Rd Cds Cgs  Ri Cds Cgs  Ri

Summary of our results, we get arbitrarily small increments


(vA3 ; vA4 ; vA7 ; vA8 ; y1 ; vA11 ; y5 ; vA6 ; vA9 ; . . .) ten equations:

y1  vA3  k ¼ 0 ; y2  vA4  k ¼ 0 ; y3  vA7  k ¼ 0 ; y4  vA8  k ¼ 0

1 1 1 1
 y3   y4    vA8
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
þ   vA11    vA3
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1
  y1 þ  y2  y1  k ¼ 0
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Cpgd  Rg  CT1

y5  vA11  k ¼ 0 ; y6  vA6  k ¼ 0 ; y7 þ y3  vA9  k ¼ 0

1 1 1 1 RL
  vA8    vA11 þ RL  y4
Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld Cout  ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld ½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ   RL  y5  y5  k ¼ 0
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 331

1 1 1 1 1 1
 y7 þ  y2 þ  y6  ½ þ þ   y3
Cds  Rds Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd
1 gm 1 gm 1
þ  y4    vA5 þ   vA9  y7  k ¼ 0
Cds  Rd Cds Cgs  Ri Cds Cgs  Ri

0 1
vA 3
B vA 4 C
B C
B vA 7 C 0 1
0 1 Bv C
B
C 0 1 y2
i1 1 ... i1 10 B A8 C v11 . . . v15 B y3 C
B .. .. .. C  B y1 C
B
CþB .. .. .. C B

C
B y4 C ¼ 0; i1
@ . . . A B vA11 C @ . . . A B C 1
B C @ y6 A
i10 1  i10 10 B vA C v10 1    v10 5
B 6 C vA 5
B vA C
B 9 C
@ y5 A
y7
¼ k; i1 2 ¼ i1 3 ¼ i1 4 ¼ 0

i1 6 ¼    ¼ i1 ¼ 0 ; i2 1 ¼ 0 ; i2 2 ¼ k ;
10
i2 3 ¼ . . . ¼ i2 10 ; i3 1 ¼ i3 2 ¼ 0 ; i3 3 ¼ k
i3 4 ¼ . . . ¼ i3 10 ¼ 0 ; i4 1 ¼ i4 2 ¼ i4 3 ¼ 0 ; i4 4 ¼ k ;
1 1
i4 5 ¼ . . . ¼ i4 10 ¼ 0 ; i5 1 ¼  
Cpgd  CT1 Lg
1 1
i5 2 ¼ 0 ; i5 3 ¼ 0 ; i5 4 ¼   ;
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
1
i5 5 ¼ k 
Cpgd  Rg  CT1
1 1
i5 6 ¼  ; i5 7 ¼ i5 8 ¼ i5 9 ¼ i5 10 ¼ 0
½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1 Ld
i6 1 ¼ . . . ¼ i6 5 ¼ 0 ; i6 6 ¼ k
i6 7 ¼ 0 ; i6 8 ¼ 0 ; i6 9 ¼ 1 ; i6 10 ¼ 0 ; i7 1 ¼ . . . ¼ i7 6 ¼ 0;
i7 7 ¼ k ; i7 8 ¼ i7 9 ¼ i7 10 ¼ 0
i8 1 ¼ . . . ¼ i8 7 ¼ 0 ; i8 8 ¼ k ; i8 9 ¼ 0 ; i8 10 ¼ 1 ;
1 1
i9 1 ¼ i9 2 ¼ i9 3 ¼ 0 i9 4 ¼ 
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL

1 1
i9 5 ¼ 0 ; i9 6 ¼  ; i9 7 ¼ i9 8 ¼0
Cout  ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL

RL 1 1
i9 9 ¼ k  ½ þ 
Ld Cout  Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
332 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

i9 10 ¼ 0 ; i10 1 ¼ i10
¼ i10 3 ¼ i10 4 ¼ i10 5 ¼ i10 6
2
gm 1
¼ i10 7 ¼ 0; i10 8 ¼ 
Cds Cgs  Ri
1
i10 9 ¼ 0 ; i10 10 ¼ k þ ; v11 ¼ . . . ¼ v15 ¼ 0 ;
Cds  Rds
v21 ¼ 1 ; v22 ¼ . . . ¼ v25 ¼ 0
v31 ¼ 0 ; v32 ¼ 1 ; v33 ¼ v34 ¼ v35 ¼ 0 ;
v41 ¼ v42 ¼ 0 ; v43 ¼ 1 ; v44 ¼ 0 ; v45 ¼ 0
1 1
v51 ¼ ; v52 ¼ ;
Cpgd  Rg  CT1 Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
1
v53 ¼ 
Rd  ½Cpds þ Cpgd   CT1
v54 ¼ v55 ¼ 0 ; v61 ¼ . . . ¼ v65 ¼ 0 ; v71 ¼ v72 ¼ v73 ¼ 0;
v74 ¼ 1 ; v75 ¼ 0 ; v81 ¼ 0 ; v82 ¼ 1
v83 ¼ v84 ¼ v85 ¼ 0 ; v91 ¼ v92 ¼ 0;
RL
v93 ¼ RL ; v94 ¼ v95 ¼ 0
½Rd1 þ 1  Ld
1 1 1 1
v10 1 ¼ ; v10 2 ¼ ½ þ þ 
Cds  Rgd Cds  Rgd Cds  Rdi Cds  Rd
1 1 gm 1
v10 3 ¼ v10 4 ¼ ; v10 5 ¼  
Cds  Rd Cds  Rdi Cds Cgs  Ri

Assumption:
0 1 0 1
v11 . . . v15 i1 1 . . . i1 10
B .. .. .. C B .. .. .. C
@ . . . A ! e; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ; A  k  I ¼ @ . . . A
v10 1    v10 5 i10 1    i10 10

0 1
vA3
B C
B vA4 C
B C
B vA C
B 7C
B C
0 1 B vA8 C 0 1
i1 ... i1 10 B C i1 ... i1
1 B y C 1 10
B .. .. .. C  B 1 C 0 ; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) detB .. .. .. C
@ . . . A B C @ . . . A 0
B vA11 C
i10  i10 10 B C i10  i10
1 B v C 1 10
B A6 C
B C
B vA9 C
B C
B y C
@ 5A
y7
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 333

To effectively apply the stability criterion of Lipunov to our system, we require a


criterion for when the equation detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 has a zero in the left half plane,
without calculating the eigenvalues explicitly. We use criterion of Routh-Hurwitz
[2–4].

3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis

A wide variety of solid state diodes and transistor have been developed for
microwave use. IMPact ionization Avalanche Transit-Time (IMPATT) diode
functions as microwave oscillator. It used to produce carrier signal for microwave
transmission system. IMPATT can operate from a few GHz to a few hundred GHz.
The diode is operated in reverse bias near breakdown, and both the N and N-
regions are completely depleted. Because of the difference in doping between the
“drift region” and “avalanche region”, the electric field is highly peaked in the
avalanche region and nearly flat in drift region. In operation, avalanche breakdown
occurs at the point of highest electric field, and this generates a large number of
hole-electron pairs by impact ionization. The holes are swept into the cathode, but
the electrons travel across the drift region toward anode. As they drift, they induce
image charges on the anode, giving rise to a displacement current in the external
circuit that is 180° out of phase with the nearly sinusoidal voltage waveform. It’s
buildup of microwave oscillations in the diode current and voltage when the diode
is embedded in a resonant cavity and biased at breakdown. The IMPATT diode has
a negative resistance from DC through microwave frequencies. Consequently, it is
prone to oscillate at low frequencies, with the lead inductance from bias circuit
connections. The voltage due to bias circuit oscillations may be large enough to
burn the device out if adequate precautions are not observed. It is prudent practice
to suppress the bias circuit oscillation. Adequate heat sink must be provided for the
diode to operate properly. These IMPATT diodes have been designed to operate in
the pre-collection mode. As the diode is tuned up from a low operating current from
a constant current source, it will be noticed that at the onset of pre-collection mode,
the diode voltage falls down. The power output will increase by several dBs with a
slight shift in the operating frequency. When the circuit is detuned in such a fashion
that the diode falls out of the pre-collection mode, the diode voltage will increase.
The power dissipation will increase as the power output falls down. If the diode is
not adequately heat sink, the diode may burn out. A main advantage is their high
power capability. These diodes are used in a variety of applications from low power
radar systems to alarms. IMPATT oscillator is for higher-power output, higher
efficiency, and higher frequency range of operation. The effect of negative
334 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

resistance of IMPATT diode in the amplification of microwave signals. Nonlinear


effects are dominant considerations in power amplifier design because of efficiency
and economy consideration of the device. IMPATT amplifier at lower frequency
band is a very interesting area. Ka-band reflection type IMPATT amplifier has been
developed using a Ka-band IMPATT diode oscillator as an input signal source.
These amplifiers have small size, simple arrangement, and sufficient power addition
for various applications in the field of high frequency communication and radar.
IMPATT amplifiers are used mostly at the high end of the microwave band because
microwave transistors do not work well above 30 GHz due to transit time limita-
tions. IMPATT uses transit time effects to generate microwaves. IMPATT amplifier
consist circulator (three ports circulator) which is connected to an IMPATT diode,
mounted in a resonant circuit or cavity. A circulator must be used to separate the
input and output powers. Since IMPATT is a single port device, circulator must be
used to separate the input and the output power RF signal. The microwave power to
be amplified enters one port of the circulator and is routed into the IMPATT diode
in cavity. The incoming microwave RF signal is amplified and leaves the cavity
from the same port that it entered. It is then routed by the circulator into the output
transmission line [67–74].
IMPATT diode construction: IMPATT diode consists of a PN junction between
the P+ and the N regions, a drift region of intrinsic (I) material, and an N+ con-
nection. IMPATT diode has negative resistance characteristics. The microwave
negative resistance of an IMPATT diode arises out of a phase difference between
the RF voltage and RF current. This phase difference is produced by the lagging RF
current generated in the space charge layer with respect to the applied RF voltage.

Fig. 3.9 IMPATT amplifier circuit with R1 load


3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 335

An IMPATT diode can function as an amplifier if the load resistance presented to it


is larger in magnitude than the diode’s negative resistance.
The intrinsic region thickness is controlled and the electron transit time through
it is a half a microwave cycle at the selected operational frequency.
Basically IMPATT diode is a form of high power diode used in high frequency
electronics and microwave devices. They operate at frequencies between 3 GHz to
100GHz or more. The main advantage of IMPATT diode is their high power
capability. These diodes are used in a variety of applications from low power radar
systems to alarms. These diodes make excellent microwave generators for many
applications. An IMPATT diode is mounted in a microwave package. The diode is
mounted with its high field region close to a copper heat sink so that the heat
generated at the diode junction can be readily dissipated.
An IMPATT diode can function as an amplifier if the load resistance presented
to it is larger in magnitude than the diode’s negative resistance. A Bias T is required
for operation of the amplifier cavity. The IMPATT diode requires a DC bias cur-
rent. It is necessary to block the DC bias current from the rest of the circuitry. This
has been accomplished using a microstrip inter-digital DC blocking capacitor cir-
cuit. The DC bias current is applied to the diode through a very high RF impedance
(quarter-wavelength long, very narrow piece of copper) terminated in a low RF
impedance (wide piece of copper). The next figure shows IMPATT reflection
amplifier. A circulator is used to separate input and output signals. The maximum
possible DC bias current above which the diode breaks into oscillations can be
readily observed also. An IMPATT diode exhibited the same characteristics of
tending toward saturation with increasing input power levels and a corresponding
increase in bandwidth.
IMPATT diode negative resistance typically varies as a function of the diode RF
current amplitude. RD is the terminal (negative) resistance of the packaged diode
and RL is the diode’s load resistance. IRDI decreases with signal level. RD also
varies with DC bias current and thus the upper limit of bias current is established at
the value that causes IRDI to equal RL. Exceeding this maximum value of bias
current will cause the diode to act as an oscillator instead of an amplifier because
the diodes load resistance, RL, is no longer greater than the magnitude of the
diode’s negative resistance, IRDI. An IMPATT amplifier requires that RL be larger
than IRDI for all values of the RF current through the diode. Since RD varies not
only with different types of diodes, but also with DC bias current and signal level,
the selection of RL for optimum power gain is of prime importance in the design of
the amplifier.
If RL [ jRD j then IMPATT diode acts as an amplifier. If RL \ jRD j then
IMPATT diode acts as an oscillator (RL = Rload).
336 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

three port
circulator
Delay line (Tau1) Delay line (Tau3)
ARB1 ARB2
1 3
N1 OUT N1 OUT

2
A RB3 R2

N1
V2 Delay line (Tau2)
Microwave RF Rload
source X(t)

OUT
C1

L1

D1
IMPATT
R1 diode

V1

V1 – DC voltage source (bias voltage to IMPATT diode).


R1 – parasitic resistance of DC voltage source.
V2 – Microwave RF source X(t).
L1, C1 – inductor and capacitor of Bias-T circuit.
ARB1, ARB2, ARB3 – circuit micro strip delay lines.
R2 – circuit load resistance.
D1 – IMPATT diode.

Fig. 3.10 IMPATT amplifier diode negative resistance circuit

IMPATT diode is current controlled negative resistance (CCNR, open circuit


stable, or “S” type). In this type, the voltage is a single valued function of current,
but the current is a multivalued function of voltage. The graph is a curve shaped like
the letter “S”. Negative differential resistance devices such as IMPATT diode are
used to make amplifiers, particularly at microwave frequencies, but not as com-
monly as oscillators. IMPATT diode (negative resistance device) has only one port
(two terminals), unlike two ports devices such as transistors, the outgoing amplified
signal has to leave the IMPATT diode by the same terminals as the incoming signal
enter it. If we do not use the circulator the IMPATT diode negative resistance
amplifier is bilateral. It amplifiers in both directions then there is high sensitivity to
load impedance and feedback problems. To separate the input and output signals,
IMPATT diode negative resistance amplifier use nonreciprocal device such as
isolator and directional couplers. In our case we use reflection amplifier in which
the separation is accomplished by an active circulator. The IMPATT diode chip RF
equivalent circuit includes the active part of the diode (the chip, excluding the
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 337

Fig. 3.11 IMPATT diode


chip RF equivalent circuit

package) as a negative resistance RD, and a reactance XD. Included in RD is the


unavoidable parasitic series resistance, RS, contributed by contacts and the un
depleted portion of the N region.
RD ¼ Rc ; Rc [ 0 ; RD \0 ; jRD j ¼ Rc ; XD ¼ jxC 1
D
. If we connect IMPATT
diode directly to bias voltage Vb which locate our IMPATT diode working point
DC characteristic in the negative resistance region. Vb is IMPATT diode bias
voltage source. Rb is voltage source series resistance. S1 is a bypass RF microwave
source switch. X(t) is RF microwave signal source.

dVCd 1
I ¼ ICd þ IRd ¼ IRb ; ICd ¼ Cd  ; VCd ¼
dt Cd
Z
 ICd  dt ; Vb ¼ I  Rb þ VCd þ VRd
Z Z
1 d 1
Vb ¼ I  Rb þ  ICd  dt þ VRd ; fVb ¼ I  Rb þ  ICd  dt þ VRd g
Cd dt Cd
dI 1 dVRd dI 1
0 ¼  Rb þ  I Cd þ )  Rb þ
dt Cd dt dt Cd
dI dVRd dVRd
 I Cd þ  ¼ 0; ¼ Rd ¼ Rc
dt dI dI

Fig. 3.12 IMPATT diode and NDR element equivalent circuit


338 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

dI 1 dI dI dI 1
 Rb þ  IC d   R c ¼ 0 )  R c   R b ¼  IC d ; R c  R b [ 0
dt Cd dt dt dt Cd
dI 1 dI=dt 1 d 1
 ðRc  Rb Þ ¼ I ) ¼ ) fln IðtÞg ¼
dt Cd I Cd  ðRc  Rb Þ dt Cd  ðRc  Rb Þ
Z
d 1 1 1
t
f fln IðtÞg ¼ g ) ln IðtÞ ¼  t ) IðtÞ ¼ eCd ðRc Rb Þ
dt Cd  ðRc  Rb Þ Cd  ðRc  Rb Þ

1
is the exponential coefficient.
Cd  ðRc  Rb Þ
We use active circulator in our circuit. Active circulators are ideally suited for
realization using monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) technology. The
circuit employs decade bandwidth active circulator which shows very low phase
error characteristic. The circuit configuration of the active circulator used three
metal–semiconductor field effect transistors (MESFETs) which are the GEC-Marconi
standard library cell F20-FET-4 × 75. With all the standard library cells, it is a very
accurate ultra-wideband small signal model for the device. It is similar to a junction
gate field-effect transistor (JFET) in construction and terminology. The difference is
that instead of using a p-n junction for gate, a schottky (metal semiconductor)
junction is used. A typical three ports decade bandwidth active circulator has three
MESFETs transistors interconnected with each other. RF, CF, LF, CC, Rsb play a
major role in the working of the circuit. The three feedback branches (RF, CF, LF)
are used to link all the three transistors in an end to end fashion. The source resistor
(Rsb) is shared among all the three MESFETs transistors and one transistor is source
coupled with the other two transistors using this source resistor. The circuit works in
a symmetric fashion. We consider MESFET high frequency model taking node
capacitors into account. Next figure describes the circuit configuration of the active
circulator [36, 37]. We use N-type MESFET but usually the recommended is a
symmetrical bilateral MESFET. All Cc and Cf capacitors are un-polarized. Once we
inject RF signal to port P1, it passes to port P2 through feedback branch (RF, CF, LF).
The same is between ports P2 and P3, ports P3 and P1. In case we inject RF signal to
port P2, it reaches Q1 gate and shorten Q1’s drain and source. Then Port 2’s RF
signal is shortened to ground through resistor Rsb and did not reach port P1. The
same is between P1 to P3 and P3 to P2. We consider a varactor which is realized by
connecting together the drain and source terminations of a standard MESFET,
resulting in a Schottky junction. The bias potential is then applied across the
drain/source and gate terminations. Our three ports decade bandwidth active circu-
lator with micro strip delay lines and IMPATT diode circuit in port P2 gets his input
RF signal from microwave RF source (port P1) and feeds antenna unit by active
circulator output RF signal (Port P3) [36, 37].
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 339

Fig. 3.13 Active circulator circuit system (version 1)

Active circulator system can be described by system path from RFin port (P1) to
RFout port (P3). For simplicity we ignore MESFET high frequency equivalent
model and took it as cutoff element in our system. Next figure describes our
IMPATT amplifier system path from microwave RF source X(t) to antenna unit
(Rload). We ignore the signal path from P3 to P1 since our amplifier RF signal is feed
directly to load antenna. Rload is a pure resistive but can be taken with additional
reactance part. We consider fully matching between antenna load resistance and
three power active circulator IMPATT diode circuit, no signal reflections. ARB1,
ARB2, and ARB3 are circuit micro strip delay line, VARB1 ðtÞ ! e ;
VARB2 ðtÞ ! e ; VARB3 ðtÞ ! e. Due to active circulator’s micro strip transmission
lines delays, s1 for the first port current, s2 for the second port current, and s3 for the
third port current. V1 is IMPATT diode bias voltage.

dVRD dVRD
I1 ðtÞ ! I1 ðt  s1 Þ ; I2 ðtÞ ! I2 ðt  s2 Þ ; I3 ðtÞ ! I3 ðt  s3 Þ ; \0 ;
dIRD dIRD
dVRD
¼ RD ; j j ¼ Rc
dIRD
340 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

Fig. 3.14 Active circulator circuit system (version 2)

First branch:

dVcf dI1 dVCC


I1 ¼ Cf  ; VLf ¼ Lf  ; I1 ¼ C C  ;
dt dt dt
d
Ceq  ½Vc þ VCC  ¼ I1 ; Ceq ¼ Cf jjCC
dt f
1 1 1 d 1 1
¼ þ ; ½Vc þ VCC  ¼ I1  ð þ Þ;
Ceq Cf CC dt f Cf CC
VP1  VP2 ¼ Vcf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC
dI1
VCf þ VCC ¼ VP1  VP2  VRf  VLf ; VCf þ VCC ¼ VP1  VP2  I1  Rf  Lf 
dt
d dVP1 dVP2 dI1 d 2 I1
ðVCf þ VCC Þ ¼    R f  Lf  ; VRf ¼ I1  Rf ; Rd ¼ RD
dt dt dt dt dt2
1 1 dVP1 dVP2 dI1 d 2 I1
I1  ð þ Þ¼    Rf  Lf  2
Cf CC dt dt dt dt

Second branch:

dVC1 dIL dVCd


I2 ¼ C 1  ; VL1 ¼ L1  1 ; ICd ¼ Cd  ;
dt dt dt
dVRd
¼Rd ; I2 þ IL1 ¼ ICd ; IR1 ¼ IL1
dIRd
ICd ¼ IRD ; V1  VA ¼ VR1 þ VL1 ; VA ¼ VCd þ VRd ;
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 341

dVC1 dVCd
VP2  VA ¼ VC1 ; C1  þ IL 1 ¼ C d 
dt dt
Z
dVC1 1 dVCd d 2 VC1
C1  þ  VL1  dt ¼ Cd  ) C1 
dt L1 dt dt2
2
1 d VCd
þ  VL1 ¼ Cd  ; VR1 ¼ IL1  R1
L1 dt2
dVRd dVCd ICd IRd
V1  VCd  VRd ¼ VR1 þ VL1 ; ¼Rd ; ¼ ¼
dIRd dt Cd Cd
dVC1 dVP2 dVCd
VC1 ¼ VP2  VA ¼ VP2  VCd  VRd ) ¼ 
dt dt dt
dVRd dVC1 dVP2 IRd dVRd
 ; ¼  
dt dt dt Cd dt
dVC1 dVP2 IRd dVRd
I2 ¼ C1  ¼ C1  ð   Þ
dt dt Cd dt
dVP2 IRd dIRd dVRd dVRd
¼ C1  ð    Þ; ¼ Rc
dt Cd dt dIRd dIRd
dVP2 IRd dIRd
I2 ¼ C1  ð  þ  Rc Þ ; I2 þ IL1 ¼ ICd ¼ IRd ) I2
dt Cd dt
dVP2 I2 þ IL1 dðI2 þ IL1 Þ
¼ C1  ð  þ  Rc Þ
dt Cd dt

Third branch:

dVCf dI3
I3 ¼ Cf  ; VLf ¼ Lf  ; VRf ¼ I3  Rf ;
dt dt
dVCC dVCf I3
I3 ¼ CC  ; IRload ¼ I3 ðt  s3 Þ ; ¼
dt dt Cf
dVCC I3 dVCC dVCf I3 I3 d 1 1
¼ ; þ ¼ þ ) ðVCC þ VCf Þ ¼ I3  ð þ Þ
dt CC dt dt Cf CC dt Cf CC
VP2  VP3 ¼ VCf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC ; VP3 ¼ VRload ¼ Rload  IRload ¼ Rload  I3 ðt  s3 Þ
dI3
VP2  VP3  VLf  VRf ¼ VCf þ VCC ; VCf þ VCC ¼ VP2  VP3  Lf   I3  Rf
dt
2
d dVP2 dVP3 d I3 dI3
ðVCf þ VCC Þ ¼   Lf  2   Rf ;
dt dt dt dt dt
1 1 dVP2 dVP3 d 2 I3 dI3
I3  ð þ Þ¼   Lf  2   Rf
Cf CC dt dt dt dt
342 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

We can summarize our system differential equation:

1 1 dVP1 dVP2 dI1 d 2 I1


I1  ð þ Þ¼    Rf  Lf  2 ;
Cf CC dt dt dt dt
dVP2 ðI2 þ IL1 Þ dðI2 þ IL1 Þ
I2 ¼ C1  ð  þ  Rc Þ
dt Cd dt
1 1 dVP2 dVP3 d 2 I3 dI3
I3  ð þ Þ¼   Lf  2   Rf
Cf CC dt dt dt dt
dVP2 I2 þ IL1 dðI2 þ IL1 Þ
I2 ¼ C1  ð  þ  Rc Þ
dt Cd dt
dVP2 I2 ðI2 þ IL1 Þ dðI2 þ IL1 Þ
) ¼ þ   Rc
dt C1 Cd dt

We get two main system differential equations:

dVP3 dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
¼ Rload 
VP3 ¼ Rload  I3 ðt  s3 Þ )
dt dt
1 1 dVP1 I2 ðI2 þ IL1 Þ dðI2 þ IL1 Þ
I1  ð þ Þ¼ ½ þ   Rc 
Cf CC dt C1 Cd dt
dI1 d 2 I1
  Rf  Lf  2
dt dt
1 1 I2 ðI2 þ IL1 Þ dðI2 þ IL1 Þ
I3  ð þ Þ¼ þ   Rc  Rload
Cf CC C1 Cd dt
dI3 ðt  s3 Þ d 2 I3 dI3
  Lf  2   Rf
dt dt dt

Since I1 ¼ I2 þ I3 ) I2 ¼ I1  I3 we get the following system differential


equations:

1 1 dVP1 I1  I3 ðI1  I3 þ IL1 Þ


I1  ð þ Þ¼ ½ þ
Cf CC dt C1 Cd
dðI1  I3 þ IL1 Þ dI1 d 2 I1
  Rc    Rf  Lf  2
dt dt dt
1 1 I1  I3 ðI1  I3 þ IL1 Þ dðI1  I3 þ IL1 Þ
I3  ð þ Þ¼ þ   Rc
Cf CC C1 Cd dt
dI3 ðt  s3 Þ d 2 I3 dI3
 Rload   Lf  2   Rf
dt dt dt
dIL1
We define the following new variables: I10 ¼ dIdt1 ; I30 ¼ dIdt3 ; IL0 1 ¼ dt
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 343

dðI1  I3 þ IL1 Þ d 2 I1 dI 0 d 2 I3 dI 0
¼ I10  I30 þ IL0 1 ; 2 ¼ 1 ; 2 ¼ 3
dt dt dt dt dt
1 1 dVP1 I1  I3 ðI1  I3 þ IL1 Þ
I1  ð þ Þ¼ ½ þ
Cf CC dt C1 Cd
0
dI
 ðI10  I30 þ IL0 1 Þ  Rc   I10  Rf  Lf  1
dt
dI10 dVP1 I1  I3 ðI1  I3 þ IL1 Þ
Lf  ¼ ½ þ
dt dt C1 Cd
1 1
 ðI10  I30 þ IL0 1 Þ  Rc   I10  Rf  I1  ð þ Þ
Cf CC
dI 0 dVP1 I1 I3 I1 I3 IL
Lf  1 ¼ ½  þ  þ 1
dt dt C1 C1 Cd Cd Cd
 I10  Rc þ I30  Rc  IL0 1  Rc 
1 1
 I10  Rf  I1  ð þ Þ
Cf CC

dI10 1 dVP1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I L1
¼   I1  ½ þ þ þ   þ I3  ½ þ   
dt Lf dt C1 Cd Cf C C Lf C1 Cd Lf Cd  Lf
1 Rc Rc
þ I10  ½Rc  Rf    I30  þ IL0 1 
Lf Lf Lf

1 1 I1  I3 ðI1  I3 þ IL1 Þ
I3  ð þ Þ¼ þ  ½I10  I30 þ IL0 1 
Cf CC C1 Cd
dI3 ðt  s3 Þ dI 0
 Rc  Rload   Lf  3  I30  Rf
dt dt
1 1 I1 I3 I1 I3 IL
I3  ð þ Þ¼  þ  þ 1  I10  Rc þ I30  Rc  IL0 1 
Cf CC C1 C1 Cd Cd Cd
dI3 ðt  s3 Þ dI 0
Rc  Rload   Lf  3  I30  Rf
dt dt
dI30 1 1 1 1 1 1
Lf  ¼ I1  ½ þ   I3  ½ þ þð þ Þ
dt C1 Cd C1 Cd Cf CC
IL dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
þ 1  I10  Rc þ I30  ½Rc  Rf   IL0 1  Rc  Rload 
Cd dt
0
dI3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ I1  ½ þ    I3  ½ þ þ þ 
dt C1 Cd Lf C1 Cd Cf CC
1 IL1 Rc ½Rc  Rf 
 þ  I10  þ I30 
Lf Cd  Lf Lf Lf
Rc Rload dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
 IL0 1   
Lf Lf dt
344 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

dIL1
Finally we get system set of differential equations: I10 ¼ dIdt1 ; I30 ¼ dIdt3 ; IL0 1 ¼ dt

dI10 1 dVP1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I L1
¼   I1  ½ þ þ þ   þ I3  ½ þ   
dt Lf dt C1 Cd Cf CC Lf C1 Cd Lf Cd  Lf
1 Rc Rc
þ I10  ½Rc  Rf    I30  þ IL0 1 
Lf Lf Lf
0
dI3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ I1  ½ þ    I3  ½ þ þ þ 
dt C1 Cd Lf C1 Cd Cf CC
1 I L1 Rc ½Rc  Rf 
 þ  I10  þ I30 
Lf Cd  Lf Lf Lf
Rc Rload dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
 IL0 1   
Lf Lf dt

dI 0 dI 0
We add the above two differential equations: f dt1 ¼ . . .g þ f dt3 ¼ . . .g

dI10 dI 0 1 dVP1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rf
þ 3¼   I1  ½ þ    I3  ½ þ    I10 
dt dt Lf dt Cf CC Lf Cf CC Lf Lf
R R dI ðt  s Þ
 I30  
f load 3 3

Lf Lf dt
dI10 dI 0 1 dVP1 1 1 1 Rf Rload dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
þ 3¼  ½ þ    ðI1 þ I3 Þ   ðI10 þ I30 Þ  
dt dt Lf dt Cf CC Lf Lf Lf dt

We define for simplicity new variables: X ¼ I1 þ I3 ; Y ¼ I10 þ I30 ; dX


dt ¼ Y.

dY 1 dVP1 1 1 1 Rf Rload dI3 ðt  s3 Þ dX


¼  ½ þ  X Y   ; ¼Y
dt Lf dt Cf C C Lf Lf Lf dt dt

I1 flows through delay line (ARB1) before it enters to port 1 then


I1 ðtÞ ! I1 ðt  s1 Þ.
I2 flows through delay line (ARB3) before entering to Bias-T and IMPATT
diode circuit. Then I2 ðtÞ ! I2 ðt  s2 Þ; accordingly, active circulator’s microstrip
transmission lines delays Δ1 for the first current derivative and Δ3 for the third port
current derivative I30 ðtÞ ! I30 ðt  D3 Þ; I10 ðtÞ ! I10 ðt  D1 Þ. I3 is the current which
flows through active circulator port 3 and it flows through delay line (ABR2) then
IRload ¼ I3 ðt  s3 Þ. I2 ; I20 are hidden variables in our analysis [6, 12, 13]. There is no
time delay in IL0 1 ; IL1 . To find our system fixed point, dY dt ¼ 0 dt ¼ 0. There is no
dX

effect of variables delay in time since t  si ) t  si t; i ¼ 1; 2; 3 and t 


Di ) t  Di t ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3 then dI3 ðts dt

! dIdt3 ðtÞ ¼ 0 .We get two main fixed
dVP
dVP1 1
points: X*, Y*. Y  ¼ 0 and 1
Lf  dt  ½C1f þ CC 
1
 L1f  X  ¼ 0 ) X  ¼ ½ 1 þdt1  1 .
Cf CC Lf
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 345

We consider the assumption which the IMPATT/Circulator amplifier input


voltage VP1 ¼ C þ nðtÞ ; C is constant voltage and nðtÞ is RF signal in time.

dVP1 dC dnðtÞ dC dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ


¼ þ ; ! 0; ! e or ! X0  sgn½ 
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt
dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ
¼ sgn½ j j ; 8 real 9j j ¼ sgn½ 
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt
dnðtÞ
dj dt j dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dVP1 dnðtÞ
dnðtÞ
¼ sgn½ 8 6¼ 0 ; ¼ 0 for ¼0
d½  dt
dt dt dt dt

dVP1 dnðtÞ dVP1 dnðtÞ


dt ¼ X0 for dt [ 0 ; dt ¼ X0 for dt \0. Then we get some possibilities
for X . X  ¼

0 8 dt ¼ 0. X  ¼ ½ 1 þX01  1 8 dnðtÞ
dnðtÞ  X0 dnðtÞ
dt [ 0 X ¼ ½C1 þ C1 L1 8 dt \0 .
C C L f C f f C f

We get the following options for system fixed points:

dnðtÞ X0 dnðtÞ
E ð0Þ ðX ð0Þ ; Y ð0Þ Þ ¼ ð0; 0Þ 8 ¼ 0 ; E ð1Þ ðX ð1Þ ; Y ð1Þ Þ ¼ ð 1 ; 0Þ 8 [0
dt ½Cf þ C1C   L1f dt
X0 dnðtÞ
E ð2Þ ðX ð2Þ ; Y ð2Þ Þ ¼ ð ; 0Þ 8 \0:
½C1f þ C1C   L1f dt

Stability analysis: We got system five differential equations:

dI1 0 dI3 0 dIL1


I10 ¼ ; I3 ¼ ; I L1 ¼
dt dt dt
dI10 1 dVP1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I L1
¼   I1  ½ þ þ þ   þ I3  ½ þ   
dt Lf dt C1 Cd Cf C C Lf C1 Cd Lf Cd  Lf
1 Rc Rc
þ I10  ½Rc  Rf    I30  þ IL0 1 
Lf Lf Lf
dI30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ I1  ½ þ    I3  ½ þ þ þ 
dt C1 Cd Lf C1 Cd Cf CC
1 I L1 Rc ½Rc  Rf 
 þ  I10  þ I30 
Lf Cd  Lf Lf Lf
R c R dI ðt  s Þ
 IL0 1  
load 3 3

Lf Lf dt
346 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

We define for simplicity two global parameters:


1 1 1 1
CP 1 ¼ þ þ þ
C1 Cd Cf CC
1 1 dI1 dI3 0 dIL1 0
CP 2 ¼ þ : ¼ I10 ; ¼I3 ; ¼IL1
C1 Cd dt dt dt
dI10 1 dVP1 1 1 I L1
¼   I1  CP 1  þ I3  CP 2  
dt Lf dt Lf Lf Cd  Lf
1 R c R c
þ I10  ½Rc  Rf    I30  þ IL0 1 
Lf Lf Lf
0
dI3 1 1 I L1 Rc
¼ I1  CP 2   I3  CP 1  þ  I10 
dt Lf Lf Cd  Lf Lf
½Rc  Rf  Rc Rload dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
þ I30   IL0 1   
Lf Lf Lf dt

1 Rc 1
N11 ¼ ½Rc  Rf   ; N12 ¼  ; N13 ¼ CP 1  ;
Lf Lf Lf
1 1
N14 ¼ CP 2  ; N15 ¼ 
Lf Cd  Lf
Rc ½Rc  Rf  1
N21 ¼ ; N22 ¼ ; N23 ¼ CP 2  ;
Lf Lf Lf
1 1
N24 ¼ CP 1  ; N25 ¼
Lf Cd  Lf
N31 ¼ 1 ; N32 ¼ 0 ; N33 ¼ 0 ; N34 ¼ 0 ; N35 ¼ 0 ; N41 ¼ 0;
N42 ¼ 1 ; N43 ¼ 0 ; N44 ¼ 0
N45 ¼ 0 ; N51 ¼    N55 ¼ 0:

We can write our system differential equations matrix representation:


0 dI 0 1 0R 1
1 0 0 1 0 1 c
B dIdt30 C 0 1 I1 1
B Lf
B C N11 . . . N15 B I0 C B 0 C R C
B dt C B . . . C B 3 C B C 1 dVP1 B B  Lfc C
C
B dI1 C ¼ @ . .. .. A  B C B C
B dt C . B I1 C þ B 0 C  Lf  dt þ B
B 0 C C
B dI3 C @ I3 A @ 0 A @0 A
@ dt A N51    N55
dIL1 I L1 0 0
dt 0 1
0
B  Rload C
B Lf C dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
 IL0 1 þ B
B0
C
C
@0 A dt
0

dI10 dI30 dI1 dI3 dIL1 0


We consider no delay effect on dt ; dt ; dt ; dt ; dt . IL1 ! e; s2 ; D2 ! e.
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 347

I1 ðtÞ ! I1 ðt  s1 Þ ; I10 ðtÞ ! I10 ðt  D1 Þ:


0 dI 0 1
1 0 0 1 0 1
B dt0 C 0 1 I1 ðt  D1 Þ 1
B dI3 C N . . . N B 0 C B C
B dt C 11 15 B I ðtÞ C B0C
B C B . . . C B 3 C B C
B 1 C¼B . .. .. C B C B C
A  B I1 ðt  s1 Þ C þ B 0 C
dI
B dt C @ .
B dI C B C B C
B 3 C N51    N55 @ I3 ðtÞ A @0A
@ dt A
dIL1 IL1 ðtÞ 0
dt
0 1
0
B  Rload C
B Lf C
1 dVP1 B C dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
  þBB 0 C
C þe
Lf dt B C dt
@0 A
0

To find equilibrium points (fixed points) of active circulator IMPATT amplifier


system by the following assumptions:

lim I 0 ðt  D1 Þ ¼ I10 ðtÞ ; lim I1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ I1 ðtÞ ;


t!1 1 t!1
dI 0 dI 0
lim I3 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ I3 ðtÞ ; 1 ¼ 0 ; 3 ¼ 0
t!1 dt dt
dI1 dI3 dIL1 0ðÞ 0ðÞ
¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ; I3 ¼ 0 ; I1 ¼ 0
dt dt dt
1 dVP1 1 1 I
  I1  CP 1  þ I3  CP 2   L1 ¼ 0
Lf dt Lf Lf Cd  Lf

1 1 I dVP1
I1  CP 2   I3  CP 1  þ L1 ¼ 0 ; þ ðI1 þ I3 Þ  ½CP 2  CP 1  ¼ 0
Lf Lf Cd  Lf dt
1
dVP
dVP1
þ ðI1 þ I3 Þ  ½CP 2  CP 1  ¼ 0 ) I1 þ I3 ¼ P dt P :
dt C 1C 2

The standard local stability analysis about anyone of the equilibrium points of
active circulator IMPATT amplifier system consist in adding to coordinates
½I10 ; I30 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1  arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1  
ekt and retaining the first order terms in I10 ; I30 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1 . The system of five ho-
mogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristics equation in the eigen-
values-λ. The polynomial characteristics equations accept by set the below currents
and currents derivative with respect to time into active circulator IMPATT diode
system equations. Active circulator IMPATT diode system fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1   ekt are: j = 0
(first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.
348 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ ðjÞ


I10 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i01  ekt ; I30 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i03  ekt ; I1 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i1  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I3 ðtÞ ¼ þ i3  ekt ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼
I3 þ iL1  ekt .
I L1
We choose the expressions for our I10 ðtÞ; I30 ðtÞ; I1 ðtÞ; I3 ðtÞ; IL1 ðtÞ as small dis-
placement ½i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1  from the active circulator IMPATT diode system fixed
0ðjÞ
points at time t = 0. I10 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i01

0ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


I30 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i03 ; I1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i1 ; I3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i3 ; IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ
ðjÞ
¼ I L1 þ i L1 :

For λ < 0, t > 0, the selected fixed point is stable otherwise λ > 0, t > 0 is
unstable (Table 1). Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for
λ < 0, t > 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. λ is the
eigenvalue parameter which is established if the fixed point is stable or unstable;
additionally, his absolute value (|λ|) establishes the speed of flow toward or away
from the selected fixed point [2] (Jack and Huseyin 1991). The speeds of flow
toward or away from the selected fixed point for active circulator IMPATT diode
amplifier system currents and currents derivatives with respect to time are:

0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
dI10 ðtÞ I 0 ðt þ DtÞ  I10 ðtÞ I þ i01  ekðt þ DtÞ  ðI1 þ i01  ekt Þ
¼ lim 1 ¼ lim 1
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
i01  ekt ½ekDt  1 ekDt 1 þ kDt dI 0
ðtÞ
¼ lim ! k  i01  ekt ; 3 ¼ k  i03  ekt
Dt!0 Dt dt
dI1 ðtÞ dI ðtÞ
¼ k  i1  ekt ; ¼ k  i3  ekt ;
3
dt dt
dIL1 ðtÞ dI 0 ðt  D1 Þ
¼ k  iL1  ekt ; 1 ¼ k  i01  ekt  ekD1
dt dt
dI30 ðt  D3 Þ dI 0 ðt  D1 Þ
¼ k  i03  ekt  ekD1 ; 1 ¼ k  i01  ekt  ekD1 ;
dt dt
dI1 ðt  s1 Þ
¼ k  i1  ekt  eks1
dt
dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
¼ k  i3  ekt  eks3 :
dt

First we take The IMPATT amplifier system’s current differential equations:


dI1
dt ¼ I10 ; dIdt3 ¼I30 and adding coordinates ½I10 ; I30 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1  arbitrarily small increments
of exponential terms ½i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1   ekt and retaining the first order terms in
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1 : k  i1  ekt ¼ I1 þ i01  ekt ; I1 ¼ 0 ) i01  k  i1 ¼ 0.
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
k  i3  ekt ¼ I3 þ i03  ekt ; I3 ¼ 0 ) i03  k  i3 ¼ 0. Second we take the
active circulator IMPATT diode’s current derivatives I10 ; I30 differential equations:
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 349

dI10 1 dVP1 1 1 IL1


¼   I1  CP 1  þ I3  CP 2  
dt Lf dt Lf Lf Cd  Lf
1 Rc Rc
þ I10  ½Rc  Rf    I30  þ IL0 1 
Lf Lf Lf
0
dI3 1 1 I L1 Rc
¼ I1  CP 2   I3  CP 1  þ  I10 
dt Lf Lf Cd  Lf Lf
½Rc  Rf  Rc Rload dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
þ I30   IL0 1   
Lf Lf Lf dt

dV
We already get dtP1 ¼ X0  sgn½dnðtÞ dt . We add coordinates ½I10 ; I30 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1 
0 0 kt
arbitrarily small increments of exponential terms ½i1 ; i3 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1   e and retaining
the first order terms in i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1 .

1 dnðtÞ
  ðI1 þ i1  ekt Þ  CP 1
ðjÞ
k  i01  ekt ¼  X0  sgn½
Lf dt
1 1
 þ ðI3 þ i3  ekt Þ  CP 2 
ðjÞ
Lf Lf
ðjÞ
ðIL1 þ iL1  ekt Þ 0ðjÞ
 þ ðI1 þ i01  ekt Þ
Cd  Lf
1 0ðjÞ Rc Rc
 ½Rc  Rf    ðI3 þ i03  ekt Þ  þ ðIL0 1 ! eÞ 
Lf Lf Lf
1
dVP
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ Rc
I3 ¼ 0 ; I1 ¼ 0 ; I1 þ I3 ¼ P dt P ; ðIL0 1 ! eÞ  0
C 1C 2 Lf

1 dnðtÞ 1
  I1  C P 1  þ I3
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ð#Þ k  i01  ekt ¼  X0  sgn½
Lf dt Lf
1 1
 CP 2   i1  CP 1   ekt
Lf Lf
ðjÞ
1 ðI þ iL1  ekt Þ
þ i3  CP 2   ekt  L1 þ i01
Lf Cd  Lf
1 Rc
 ekt  ½Rc  Rf    i03  ekt 
Lf Lf
350 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

1
k  i03  ekt ¼ ðI1 þ i1  ekt Þ  CP 2   ðI3 þ i3  ekt Þ  CP 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Lf
ðjÞ
1 ðI þ iL1  ekt Þ 0ðjÞ Rc
 þ L1  ðI1 þ i01  ekt Þ 
Lf Cd  Lf Lf
0ðjÞ ½Rc  Rf  Rc Rload
þ ðI3 þ i03  ekt Þ   ðIL0 1 ! eÞ  
Lf Lf Lf
 k  i3  ekt  eks3 ; eks3 ! 1

k  i3  ekt ¼ I1  CP 2  L1f þ i1  CP 2  L1f


0 ðjÞ

ekt  I3  CP 1  L1f  i3  CP 1  L1f  ekt


ðjÞ

ð##Þ ðjÞ
ðIL þ iL1 ekt Þ 0 0
 i1  ekt  Lfc þ i3
R
þ 1
Cd Lf
½Rc Rf 
 Lf  RLload f
 k  i3  ekt

Adding two expressions: (#) + (##)

1 dnðtÞ 1
  I 1  CP 1 
ðjÞ
k  i01  ekt þ k  i03  ekt ¼  X0  sgn½
Lf dt Lf
1 1
þ I3  CP 2   i1  CP 1   ekt þ i3  CP 2
ðjÞ
Lf Lf
ðjÞ
1 kt ðIL1 þ iL1  ekt Þ
 e  þ i01  ekt  ½Rc  Rf 
Lf Cd  Lf
1 Rc 1 1
þ fI1  CP 2  þ i1  CP 2   ekt  I3
ðjÞ ðjÞ
  i03  ekt 
Lf Lf Lf Lf
ðjÞ
1 1 ðI þ iL1  ekt Þ
 CP 1   i3  CP 1   ekt þ L1
Lf Lf Cd  L f
Rc ½R c  R  R
 i01  ekt  þ i03  ekt   k  i3  ekt g
f load

Lf Lf Lf

1 dnðtÞ
 þ I1  ½CP 2  CP 1 
ðjÞ
k  ½i01 þ i03   ekt ¼  X0  sgn½
Lf dt
1 1
 þ I3  ½CP 2  CP 1  
ðjÞ
Lf Lf
1 1
þ i1  ½CP 2  CP 1    ekt þ i3  ½CP 2  CP 1  Rload  k   ekt
Lf Lf
1 Rc ½Rc  Rf  0 kt Rc
þ i01  ekt  ½Rc  Rf    i01  ekt  þ i03  ekt   i3  e 
Lf Lf Lf Lf
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 351

1 dnðtÞ 1
 þ ½CP 2  CP 1    ðI1 þ I3 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
k  ½i01 þ i03   ekt ¼  X0  sgn½
Lf dt Lf
1
þ i1  ½CP 2  CP 1    ekt þ i3  ½CP 2  CP 1  Rload  k
Lf
1 Rf Rf
  ekt  i01  ekt   i03  ekt 
Lf Lf Lf

dVP
ðjÞ ðjÞ 1
We already found the system fixed points condition: I1 þ I3 ¼ CP dt
CP
1 2

1
dVP
1 dnðtÞ 1
k  ½i01 þ i03   ekt ¼  X0  sgn½  þ ½CP 2  CP 1    P dt P
Lf dt Lf C 1  C 2
1
þ i1  ½CP 2  CP 1    ekt þ i3  ½CP 2  CP 1  Rload  k
Lf
1 Rf Rf
  ekt  i01  ekt   i03  ekt 
Lf Lf Lf

1 dnðtÞ dVP1 1
k  ½i01 þ i03   ekt ¼  ½X0  sgn½   þ i1  ½CP 2  CP 1    ekt
Lf dt dt Lf
1
þ i3  ½CP 2  CP 1  Rload  k   ekt  i01  ekt
Lf
Rf Rf
  i03  ekt 
Lf Lf

dVP1 dnðtÞ 1
¼ X0  sgn½  ) k  ½i01 þ i03   ekt ¼ i1  ½CP 2  CP 1    ekt
dt dt Lf
1 Rf Rf
þ i3  ½CP 2  CP 1  Rload  k   ekt  i01  ekt   i03  ekt 
Lf Lf Lf

We divide two sides of the above equation by ekt

1 1 Rf
k  ½i01 þ i03  ¼ i1  ½CP 2  CP 1   þ i3  ½CP 2  CP 1  Rload  k   i01 
Lf Lf Lf
0 Rf
 i3 
Lf
352 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

1 1 Rf
i1 ½CP 2  CP 1   þ i3  ½CP 2  CP 1  Rload  k   i01 
Lf Lf Lf
Rf
 i03   k  ½i01 þ i03  ¼ 0
Lf

1 1 Rf Rf
i1 ½CP 2  CP 1   þ i3  ðCP 2  CP 1 Þ   i01   i03 
Lf Lf Lf Lf
1
 ði01 þ i03 þ i3  Rload  Þ  k ¼ 0
Lf

Three cases: CP 2  CP 1 [ Rf ; CP 2  CP 1 \Rf . CP 2  CP 1 ¼ Rf .


We can summery our equations of arbitrarily small increments:

i01  k  i1 ¼ 0; i03  k  i3 ¼ 0
1 1
i1  ½CP 2  CP 1   þ i3  ðCP 2  CP 1 Þ   i01
Lf Lf
Rf Rf 1
  i03   ði01 þ i03 þ i3  Rload  Þ  k ¼ 0
Lf Lf Lf

The active circulator IMPATT diode amplifier system eigenvalues options are
describe in the below table.

Table 3.8 Active circulator IMPATT diode amplifier system eigenvalues options
λ<0 λ>0
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
t=0 I10 ðt¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i01 I10 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i01
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
I30 ðt¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i03 I30 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i03
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i1 I1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i3 I3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i3
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
t>0 I10 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i01  ejkjt I10 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i01  ejkjt
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
I30 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i03  ejkjt I30 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i03  ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I1 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i1  ejkjt I1 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i1  ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I3 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i3  ejkjt I3 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i3  ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ejkjt IL1 ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ejkjt
t > 0; t → ∞ I10 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ I1
0ðjÞ
I10 ðt ! 1Þ i01  ejkjt
0ðjÞ
I30 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ I3 I30 ðt ! 1Þ i03  ejkjt
I1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ I1
ðjÞ I1 ðt ! 1Þ i1  ejkjt
ðjÞ I3 ðt ! 1Þ i3  ejkjt
I3 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ I3
ðjÞ IL1 ðt ! 1Þ iL1  ejkjt
IL1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ IL1
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 353

We already define

ðjÞ ðjÞ
I1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ I1 þ i1  ekðts1 Þ ; I3 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ I3 þ i3  ekðts3 Þ ;
0ðjÞ
I10 ðt  D1 Þ ¼ I1 þ i01  ekðtD1 Þ
0ðjÞ ðjÞ
I30 ðt  D3 Þ ¼ I3 þ i03  ekðtD3 Þ ; IL1 ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt

Then we get four delayed differential equations with respect to coordinates


½I10 ; I30 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1 
arbitrarily small increments of exponential ½i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1   ekt .
dI 0 dI 0 dIL1
We consider no delay effect on dt1 ; dt3 ; dIdt1 ; dIdt3 ; dt . We neglect the time delay s2
which related to active circulator branch 2.

0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ ðjÞ


I10 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i01  ekt ; I30 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i03  ekt ; I1 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i1  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I3 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i3  ekt ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt
1 Rc 1
N11 ¼ ½Rc  Rf   ; N12 ¼  ; N13 ¼ CP 1  ;
Lf Lf Lf
1 1
N14 ¼ CP 2  ; N15 ¼ 
Lf Cd  Lf
Rc ½Rc  Rf  1
N21 ¼  ; N22 ¼ ; N23 ¼ CP 2  ;
Lf Lf Lf
1 1
N24 ¼ CP 1  ; N25 ¼
Lf Cd  Lf
N31 ¼ 1 ; N32 ¼ 0 ; N33 ¼ 0 ; N34 ¼ 0 ; N35 ¼ 0;
N41 ¼ 0 ; N42 ¼ 1 ; N43 ¼ 0 ; N44 ¼ 0
N45 ¼ 0 ; N51 ¼    N55 ¼ 0:
0 dI 0 1
0 1 0 1 0 1
I10 ðt  D1 Þ
1

B dIdt30 C 0 1 1 0
B C N11 . . . N15 B I 0 ðtÞ C B0C B Rload C
B dt C B . .. .. C B 3 C B C 1 dVP1 B  Lf C
B dI1 C¼@ . B C B C B C
B dt C . . . A  B I1 ðt  s1 Þ C þ B 0 C  L  dt þ B 0 C
B dI3 C @ I3 ðtÞ A @0A f @0 A
@ dt A N51    N55
dIL1 IL1 ðtÞ 0 0
dt
dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
 þe
dt

0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ ðjÞ


i01  k  ekt ¼ N11  ðI1 þ i01  ekðtD1 Þ Þ þ N12  ðI3 þ i03  ekt Þ þ N13  ðI1 þ i1  ekðts1 Þ Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ 1 dVP1
þ N14  ðI3 þ i3  ekt Þ þ N15  ðIL1 þ iL1  ekt Þ þ 
Lf dt
354 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ 1 dVP1


i01  k  ekt ¼ N11  I1 þ N12  I3 þ N13  I1 þ N14  I3 þ N15  IL1 þ  þ N11  i01  ekðtD1 Þ
Lf dt
þ N12  i03  ekt þ N13  i1  ekðts1 Þ þ N14  i3  ekt þ N15  iL1  ekt

dI10
We already know that at fixed point: dt ¼0

dI10 0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ 1 dVP1


¼ 0 ) N11  I1 þ N12  I3 þ N13  I1 þ N14  I3 þ N15  IL1 þ  ¼0
dt Lf dt

i01  k  ekt ¼ N11  i01  ekðtD1 Þ þ N12  i03  ekt


þ N13  i1  ekðts1 Þ þ N14  i3  ekt þ N15  iL1  ekt
i01  ½N11  ekD1  k  ekt þ N12  i03  ekt þ N13  i1  ekðts1 Þ
þ N14  i3  ekt þ N15  iL1  ekt ¼ 0
i01  ½N11  ekD1  k þ N12  i03 þ N13  i1  eks1 þ N14  i3 þ N15  iL1 ¼ 0

0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
k  i03  et ¼ N21  ðI1 þ i01  ekðtD1 Þ Þ þ N22  ðI3 þ i03  ekt Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ N23  ðI1 þ i1  ekðts1 Þ Þ þ N24  ðI3 þ i3  ekt Þ þ N25    ðIL1 þ iL1  ekt Þ
Rload dI3 ðt  s3 Þ
 
Lf dt

dI3 ðtÞ 0 0 dI3 ðts3 Þ


Assumption: since dt ¼I3 ðtÞ then I3 ðt  D3 Þ ¼ dt .
0 0ðjÞ 0 kt 0 0ðjÞ 0 kðtD3 Þ 0ðjÞ
I3 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i3  e ) I3 ðt  D3 Þ ¼ I3 þ i3  e . At fixed point I3 ¼ 0
dI30 dI3 ðts3 Þ
since dt ¼ 0 then dt j@ fixed point ¼ I3 ðt  D3 Þj@fixed point ¼ i03  ekðtD3 Þ .
0

0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ ðjÞ


k  i03  et ¼ N21  ðI1 þ i01  ekðtD1 Þ Þ þ N22  ðI3 þ i03  ekt Þ þ N23  ðI1 þ i1  ekðts1 Þ Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ Rload 0 kðtD3 Þ
þ N24  ðI3 þ i3  ekt Þ þ N25    ðIL1 þ iL1  ekt Þ   i3  e
Lf

0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


k  i03  et ¼ N21  I1 þ N22  I3 þ N23  I1 þ N24  I3
ðjÞ
þ N25  IL1 þ i01  N21  ekðtD1 Þ
þ i03  N22  ekt þ i1  N23  ekðts1 Þ þ i3  N24  ekt þ iL1
Rload 0 kðtD3 Þ
 N25  ekt   i3  e
Lf

dI30
We already know that at fixed point: dt ¼0
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 355

dI30 0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


¼ 0 ) N21  I1 þ N22  I3 þ N23  I1 þ N24  I3 þ N25  IL1 ¼ 0
dt

k  i03  et ¼ i01  N21  ekðtD1 Þ þ i03  N22  ekt þ i1  N23  ekðts1 Þ þ i3  N24
Rload
 ekt þ iL1  N25  ekt   k    i03  ekðtD3 Þ
Lf

i01  N21  ekt  ekD1 þ i03  N22  ekt  k  i03  et þ i1  N23  ekt  eks1 þ i3
Rload 0 kðtD3 Þ
 N24  ekt þ iL1  N25  ekt   i3  e ¼0
Lf

Rload kD3
i01  N21  ekD1 þ i03  ½N22  e  k þ i1  N23
Lf
 eks1 þ i3  N24 þ iL1  N25 ¼ 0

dI1 0ðjÞ
¼ N31  I10 ðt  D1 Þ ) k  i1  ekt ¼ N31  ðI1 þ i01  ekðtD1 Þ Þ ;
dt
0ðjÞ
I1 ¼ 0 ; N31  i01  ekD1  k  i1 ¼ 0
dI3 0ðjÞ
¼ N42  I30 ðtÞ ) k  i3  ekt ¼ N42  ðI3 þ i03  ekt Þ ;
dt
0ðjÞ
I3 ¼ 0 ; N42  i03  k  i3 ¼ 0

L1 is an element of IMPATT diode Bias-T circuit. It forwards DC current to bias


the IMPATT diode in the negative resistance characteristic region. It blocks any RF
signal which comes from V1 (DC voltage source). The IMPATT diode work point
is stable and the DC current which flows through inductor L1 is fixing.
dIL1
dt¼ 0 ) k  iL1  ekt ¼ 0 ) k  iL1 ¼ 0. We can summery our small increments
equations of our active circulator IMPATT diode amplifier system.

i01  ½N11  ekD1  k þ N12  i03 þ N13  i1  eks1 þ N14  i3 þ N15  iL1 ¼ 0
Rload kD3
i01  N21  ekD1 þ i03  ½N22  e  k þ i1
Lf
 N23  eks1 þ i3  N24 þ iL1  N25 ¼ 0
N31  i01  ekD1  k  i1 ¼ 0 ; N42  i03  k  i3 ¼ 0 ; k  iL1 ¼ 0 ) k  iL1 ¼ 0

The small increments Jacobian of our active circulator IMPATT diode amplifier
system is as follow:
356 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

0 1
0 1 i01
!11 ... !15 B 0 C
B i3 C
B . .. .. C B C
B . C  B i1 C ¼ 0 ; !11 ¼ N11  ekD1  k;
@ . . . A B C
B C
!51  !55 @ i3 A
iL1
!12 ¼ N12 ; !13 ¼ N13  eks1 ; !14 ¼ N14
Rload
!15 ¼ N15 ; !21 ¼ N21  ekD1 ; !22 ¼ N22 
Lf
 ekD3  k ; !23 ¼ N23  eks1 ; !24 ¼ N24
!25 ¼ N25 ; !31 ¼ N31  ekD1 ; !32 ¼ 0 ; !33 ¼ k ;
!34 ¼ !35 ¼ 0 ; !41 ¼ 0 ; !42 ¼ N42
!43 ¼ 0 ; !44 ¼ k ; !45 ¼ 0 ; !51 ¼ !52 ¼ !53 ¼ !54 ¼ 0 ;  55 ¼ k
0 1
!11 . . . !15
B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A ; detjA  k  Ij¼ 0 ; Dðs1 ; D1 ; D3 Þ ¼ detjA  k  Ij
!51    !55

We inspect the occurrence of any possible stability switching resulting from the
increase of value of time delays s1 ; D1 ; D3 for the active circulator IMPATT diode
amplifier system general characteristic equation Dðs1 ; D1 ; D3 Þ ¼ 0[6].

Dðs1 ; D1 ; D3 Þ ¼ detjA  k  Ij ¼ ðN11  ekD1  kÞ


0 1
ðN22  RLload
f
 ekD3  kÞ . . . N25
B C
 detB .. .. .. C
@ . . . A
0  k
0 kD1
1
N21  e N25 ...
B .. .. C
..
 N12  detB
@ .
C
. A þ N13  e
.
ks1

0    k
0 1 0 1
N21  ekD1 . . . N25 N21  ekD1 . . . N25
B .. .. .. C B .. .. .. C
 detB
@ . .
C B
. A  N14  det@ . .
C
. A
0  k 0    k
0 kD1
1
N21  e . . . N24
B .. .. .. C
þ N15  detB
@ . .
C
. A
0  0
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 357

P5
We define gi ; i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; 5 functions. Dðs1 ; D1 ; D3 Þ ¼ detjA  k  Ij ¼ i¼1 gi

gi ¼ gi ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ; l ¼ 1; . . .; 5 ; k ¼ 1; . . .; 5
g1 ¼ g1 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ; g2 ¼ g2 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ
g3 ¼ g3 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ; g4 ¼ g4 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ ; g5 ¼ 0

g1 ¼ g1 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ ¼ ðN11  ekD1  kÞ


0 1
ðN22  RLload f
 ekD3  kÞ . . . N25
B C
 detB .. .. .. C
@ . . . A
0    k
0 1
N21  ekD1 . . . N25
B .. .. .. C
g2 ¼ g2 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ ¼ N12  detB @ . . . A
C

0    k
0 kD1
1
N21  e . . . N25
B .. .. .. C
g3 ¼ g3 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ ¼ N13  eks1  detB
@ . .
C
. A
0    k
0 kD1
1
N21  e . . . N25
B .. .. .. C
g4 ¼ g4 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ ¼ N14  detB @ . . . A
C

0    k
0 kD1
1
N21  e . . . N24
B .. .. .. C
g5 ¼ N15  detB @ . .
C
. A¼0
0  0

Rload kD3
g1 ¼ ðN11  ekD1  kÞ  ðN22  k3 þ k3  e þ k4  k2  N24  N42 Þ
Lf
Rload kðD3 þ D1 Þ
¼ N11  N24  N42  ekD1  k2 þ fN11  e
Lf
Rload kD3
 N11  N22  ekD1 g  k3 þ ðN11  ekD1  e g
Lf
 k4 þ N24  N42  k3 þ N22  k4  k5

g2 ¼ N12  fk3  N21  ekD1  N23  N31  k2  ekðs1 þ D1 Þ g ¼ k3  N12  N21  ekD1
þ N23  N31  N12  k2  ekðs1 þ D1 Þ
358 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

g3 ¼ N13  eks1  fN22  N31  ekD1


Rload kðD3 þ D1 Þ
 k2 þ e  N31  k2 þ k3  N31  ekD1
Lf
 N24  N31  N42  k  ekD1 g ¼ k3  N31  N13  ekðD1 þ s1 Þ
Rload kðD3 þ D1 þ s1 Þ
þ k2  fN31  N13  e
Lf
 N31  N13  N22  ekðD1 þ s1 Þ g  N24  N31  N42  N13  ekðD1 þ s1 Þ  k

g4 ¼ N14  ðN21  N42  ekD1  k2  N23  N31  N42  ekðs1 þ D1 Þ  kÞ


¼ N14  N21  N42  ekD1  k2
þ N14  N23  N31  N42  ekðs1 þ D1 Þ  k

We analyze our system stability switching for the following cases:


(I) s1 ¼ s ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 (II) s1 ¼ 0 ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D
(III) s1 ¼ s ; D1 ¼ k  s ; D2 ¼ ð1  kÞ  s ; 0\k\1
We summery our results in the following table: Dðs1 ; D1 ; D3 Þ ¼
P5
detjA  k  Ij ¼ gi
i¼1
We need to get characteristics equations for all above stability analysis cases. We
study the occurrence of any possible stability switching resulting from the increase
of value of the time delays D; s and balance parameter k (0 < k < 1) for the general
characteristic equation DðD; s; kÞ. If we choose s parameter then Dðk; s; kÞ ¼
P5
gi ¼ Pn ðk; s; kÞ þ Qm ðk; s; kÞ  eks . The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ:
i¼1

Table 3.9 IMPATT amplifier system stability switching cases


Case (I) s1 ¼ s ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 Case (II) s1 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D s1 ¼ s; D1 ¼ k  s
Case (III)
D2 ¼ ð1  kÞ  s; 0\k\1

g1 g1 ¼ N11  N24  N42  k2 g1 ¼ ½N11  N24  N42  k2 g1 ¼ N11  N24  N42  ekks  k2
Rload
þ fN11   N11  N22
þð
Rload kD
e  N22 Þ  N11  k3 þ ðN24  N42  N11  N22  ekks Þ  k3
Lf
Lf
þ N24  N42 g  k3 þ ðN11  ekks þ N22 Þ  k4  k5
Rload
Rload þ ðN11  Þ  k4   ekD Rload 3
þ fN11 þ N22  g  k4  k5 L f þ ðN11  k
Lf Lf
þ N24  N42  k3 þ N22  k4  k5 Rload kks 4
 e  k Þ  eks
Lf
g2 g2 ¼ k3  N12  N21 g2 ¼ ðN12  N23  N31  k2 g2 ¼ N12  N21  ekks  k3
þ k2  N12  N23  N31  eks þ N12  N21  k3 Þ  ekD þ N12  N23  N31  ekks  eks  k2
g3 g3 ¼ fN24  N31  N42  N13  k g3 ¼ fN24  N31  N42  N13  k g3 ¼ N13  N31  ekks  eks  k3
Rload Rload kD Rload ks
þ ðN13  N31  þ ðN13  N31  e þ fN13  N31  e
Lf Lf Lf
 N13  N22  N31 Þ  k2  N13  N22  N31 Þ  k2  N13  N22  N31  ekks g  k2  eks
þ N13  N31  k3 g  eks þ N13  N31  k3 g  ekD  N24  N31  N42  N13  ekks  eks  k
g4 g4 ¼ N14  N21  N42  k2 g4 ¼ N14  N21  N42  k2 g4 ¼ N14  N21  N42  ekks  k2
þ N14  N23  N31  N42  eks  k þ N14  N23  N31  N42  eks  k þ N14  N23  N31  N42  eks  ekks  k
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 359

X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pj ðsÞ  k j ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k2 þ P3 ðsÞ  k3 þ   
j¼0

The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ:

X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qj ðsÞ  k j ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 þ q3 ðsÞ  k3 þ   
j¼0

P
5
If we choose D parameter then Dðk; DÞ ¼ gi ¼ Pn ðk; DÞ þ Qm ðk; DÞ  ekD .
i¼1
The expression for Pn ðk; DÞ:

X
n
Pn ðk; DÞ ¼ Pj ðDÞ  k j ¼ P0 ðDÞ þ P1 ðDÞ  k þ P2 ðDÞ  k2 þ P3 ðDÞ  k3 þ   
j¼0

The expression for Qm ðk; DÞ [38, 39]:

X
m
Qm ðk; DÞ ¼ qj ðDÞ  k j ¼ q0 ðDÞ þ q1 ðDÞ  k þ q2 ðDÞ  k2 þ q3 ðDÞ  k3 þ   
j¼0

Remark: Balance parameter k (0 < k < 1) appears only in the third case. For all
cases which s and/or k or D include in Pn and Qm expressions, we take the fol-
lowing assumptions for power Taylor approximation series only for these
expressions.

X
1
ðk  k  sÞn k2  k 2  s 2
ekks ¼ 1  k  k  sþ ;
n¼0
n! 2
X
1
ðk  sÞn k2  s 2
eks ¼ 1  k  sþ
n¼0
n! 2
X
1
ðk  k  sÞn k2  k 2  s 2
ekks ¼ 1þk  k  sþ ;
n¼0
n! 2
X
1
ðk  sÞn k2  s 2
eks ¼ 1þk  sþ
n¼0
n! 2
X
1
ðk  DÞn k2  D2
ekD ¼ 1  k Dþ ;
n¼0
n! 2
X
1
ðk  DÞn k2  D 2
ekD ¼ 1þk  Dþ
n¼0
n! 2
360 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

Balance parameter, k only appears in the third case (Case III). We use the
general geometric criterion [BK] and investigate the occurrence of any possible
stability switching resulting from the increase of value of time delay parameters s; D
for the general characteristic equation DðD; s; kÞ ¼ 0 [6].

Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; Dðk; DÞ ¼ Pn ðk; DÞ þ Qm ðk; DÞ  ekD

P
n
In the case our time delay parameter is s: Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pj ðsÞ  k j Qm ðk; sÞ ¼
j¼0
P
m
qj ðsÞ  k j . In the case our time delay parameter is D:
j¼0
P P
Pn ðk; DÞ ¼ nj¼0 Pj ðDÞ  k j ; Qm ðk; DÞ ¼ m j¼0 qj ðDÞ  k
j
. n; m 2 N0 ; n [
m; pj ðÞ; qj ðÞ:R þ 0 ! R The expressions are continuous and differentiable func-
tions of s or D.
We summery our Pn ðk; s; kÞ and Qm ðk; s; kÞ expressions in the below table:
There are three cases to analyze stability switching under delay parameter
variation. We choose to analyze the second case (II). It is reader exercise to do the
same analysis for cases I and III. According stability switch criteria [BK],
n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m.

X
1
ðk  DÞn
Pn ðk; DÞ ¼ N24  N42  k3 þ N22  k4  k5 ; ekD 1kD
n¼0
n!

Table 3.10 IMPATT amplifier system Pn ðk; s; kÞ and Qm ðk; s; kÞ expressions


Case (I) s1 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 Case (II) s1 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D s1 ¼ s; D1 ¼ k  s
Case (III)
n = 5; m = 3; n > m n = 5; m = 4; n > m D2 ¼ ð1  kÞ  s; 0\k\1

Pn ðk; sÞ Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k2  ðN11  N24  N42 Pn ðk; DÞ ¼ N24  N42  k3 Pn ðk; s; kÞ ¼ ½N14  N21
Or þ N14  N21  N42 Þ þ N22  k4  k5  N11  N24   N42  ekks  k2
Pn ðk; s; kÞ
þ k3  ðN11 
Rload
 N11  N22 þ ½N24  N42  N11  N22  ekks
Or Lf
þ N12  N21  ekks   k3
Pn ðk; DÞ þ N24  N42 þ N12  N21 Þ
þ ðN11  ekks þ N22 Þ  k4  k5
Rload
þ k4  ðN11 þ N22  Þ  k5
Lf
Qm ðk; sÞ Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ ðN24  N31  N42  N13 Qm ðk; DÞ ¼ ðN24  N31  N42  N13 Rload kks 4
Qm ðk; s; kÞ ¼  e k
Or þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ  k þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ  k Lf
Qm ðk; s; kÞ þ ðN12  N23  N31 þ ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ ½N11 
Rload
þ N13  N31  ekks   k3
Or Lf
Rload Rload kD
Qm ðk; DÞ þ N13  N31  þ N13  N31  e þ ½N12  N23  N31  ekks
Lf Lf
Rload ks
 N13  N22  N31 Þ  k2  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ  k2 þ N13  N31  e
Lf
þ N13  N31  k3 þ fð
Rload kD
e  N22 Þ  N11
Lf  N13  N22  N31  ekks   k2
þ N12  N21 þ N13  N31 g  k3 þ ½N14  N23  N42
Rload  N24  N42  N13   N31  ekks  k
þ ðN11  Þ  k4
Lf
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 361

Qm ðk; DÞ ¼ ðN24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ  k


Rload
þ ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31 
Lf
 ekD  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ  k2
Rload kD
þ fð e  N22 Þ  N11 þ N12  N21
Lf
Rload
þ N13  N31 g  k3 þ ðN11  Þ  k4
Lf

Qm ðk; DÞ ¼ ðN24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ  k


þ ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31
Rload
  ½1  k  D  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ  k2
Lf
Rload
þ fð  ½1  k  D  N22 Þ  N11 þ N12
Lf
Rload
 N21 þ N13  N31 g  k3 þ ðN11  Þ  k4
Lf

Qm ðk; DÞ ¼ ðN24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ  k


þ ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31
Rload
  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ  k2
Lf
Rload Rload
þf  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13  N31  N13  N31   Dg
Lf Lf
Rload Rload
 k3 þ fN11    D  N11 g  k4
Lf Lf

Result: n = 5, m = 4; n > m. n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m
The expression Pn ðk; s; kÞ is as follow:

X
n
Pn ðDÞ ¼ Pj ðDÞ  k j ¼ P0 ðDÞ þ P1 ðDÞ  k þ P2 ðDÞ
j¼0

 k2 þ P3 ðDÞ  k3 þ P4 ðDÞ  k4 þ P5 ðDÞ  k5


P0 ðDÞ ¼ 0; P1 ðDÞ ¼ 0; P2 ðDÞ ¼ 0; P5 ðDÞ ¼ 1; P3 ðDÞ ¼ N24  N42 ; P4 ðDÞ ¼ N22
362 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

The expression for Qm ðDÞ is as follow:


X
m
Qm ðDÞ ¼ qj ðDÞ  k j ¼ q0 ðDÞ þ q1 ðDÞ  k þ q2 ðDÞ  k2 þ q3 ðDÞ  k3 þ q4 ðDÞ  k4
j¼0

q0 ðDÞ ¼ 0; q1 ðDÞ ¼ N24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42
q2 ðDÞ ¼ N11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31
Rload
  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42
Lf
Rload Rload
q3 ðDÞ ¼  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13  N31  N13  N31  D
Lf Lf
Rload Rload
q4 ðDÞ ¼ N11    D  N11
Lf Lf

The homogeneous system for I10 ; I30 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1 leads to a characteristic equation
P
for the eigenvalue λ having the form PðDÞ þ QðDÞ  ekD ¼ 0; PðDÞ ¼ 5j¼0 aj 
P
k j ; QðDÞ ¼ 4j¼0 cj  k j and the coefficients faj ðqi ; ql ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; ql ; sÞg 2 R depend
on qi ; ql and delay s. qi ; ql are any system’s parameters, other parameters kept as a
constant a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a5 ¼ 1

a2 ¼ 0; a3 ¼ N24  N42 ; a4 ¼ N22 ; c0 ¼ 0;


c1 ¼ N24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42
c2 ¼ N11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31
Rload
  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42
Lf
Rload
c3 ¼  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13  N31  N13  N31
Lf
Rload Rload Rload
  D; c4 ¼ N11    D  N11
Lf Lf Lf

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the variation arguments ðqi ; ql Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 þ c0 ¼ 0 8 qi ; ql 2 R þ ; that is λ = 0 is of Pðk; DÞ þ Qðk; DÞ  eks ¼ 0.
Furthermore, Pðk; DÞ; Qðk; DÞ are analytic functions of λ, for which the following
requirements of the analysis [5, 41] can also be verified in the present case:
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R, then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek
0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in ω.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; ql Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable with
respect to qi ; ql .
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 363

We assume that Pn ðDÞ and Qm ðDÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That is
for any real number ω;

Pn ðk ¼ i  x; DÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; DÞ 6¼ 0; k2 ¼ x2 ; k3 ¼ i  x3
k4 ¼ x4 ; k5 ¼ i  x5 :Pn ðk ¼ i  x; DÞ ¼ N22  x4  i  ½N24  N42  x3 þ x5 

Qm ðk ¼ i  x; DÞ ¼ ðN24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ  i  x


Rload
 ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31   N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ  x2
Lf
Rload Rload
f  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13  N31  N13  N31   Dg  i  x3
Lf Lf
Rload Rload
þ fN11    D  N11 g  x4
Lf Lf

Qm ðk ¼ i  x; DÞ ¼ ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31


Rload
  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ  x2
Lf
Rload Rload
þ fN11    D  N11 g  x4
Lf Lf
þ fðN24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ  x
Rload
ð  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13
Lf
Rload
 N31  N13  N31   DÞ  x3 g  i
Lf

Pn ðk ¼ i  x; DÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; DÞ ¼ ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12


Rload
 N23  N31 þ N13  N31 
Lf
Rload
 N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ  x2 þ fN11 
Lf
Rload
  D  N11 þ N22 g  x4
Lf
þ i  fðN24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ  x
Rload
ð  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13  N31  N13  N31
Lf
Rload
  D þ N24  N42 Þ  x3  x5 g 6¼ 0
Lf

jPði  x; DÞj2 ¼ N224  N242  x6 þ ½N222 þ 2  N24  N42   x8 þ x10 . We define for
simplicity the following global parameters:
364 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

X1 ¼ N11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31


Rload
  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42
Lf
Rload Rload
X2 ðDÞ ¼ N11    D  N11 ;
Lf Lf
X3 ¼ N24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42
Rload Rload
X4 ðDÞ ¼  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13  N31  N13  N31  D
Lf Lf
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; DÞ ¼ X1  x2 þ X2 ðDÞ  x4 þ fX3  x  X4 ðDÞ  x3 g  i

jQði  x; DÞj2 ¼ fX1  x2 þ X2 ðDÞ  x4 g2 þ fX3  x  X4 ðDÞ  x3 g2


jQði  x; DÞj2 ¼ X21  x4 þ X22 ðDÞ  x8  2  X1  X2 ðDÞ
 x6 þ X23  x2 þ X24 ðDÞ  x6  2  X3  X4 ðDÞ  x4
jQði  x; DÞj2 ¼ X23  x2 þ ½X21  2  X3  X4 ðDÞ  x4
þ ½X24 ðDÞ  2  X1  X2 ðDÞ  x6 þ X22 ðDÞ  x8

Fðx; DÞ ¼ jPði  x; DÞj2  jQði  x; DÞj2 ¼ N224  N242  x6


þ ½N222 þ 2  N24  N42   x8 þ x10
 X23  x2  ½X21  2  X3  X4 ðDÞ  x4
 ½X24 ðDÞ  2  X1  X2 ðDÞ  x6  X22 ðDÞ  x8

Fðx; DÞ ¼ jPði  x; DÞj2  jQði  x; DÞj2 ¼ X23  x2  ½X21  2  X3  X4 ðDÞ  x4


þ N224  N242  x6  ½X24 ðDÞ  2  X1  X2 ðDÞ  x6
þ ½N222 þ 2  N24  N42   x8  X22 ðDÞ  x8 þ x10

Fðx; DÞ ¼ jPði  x; DÞj2  jQði  x; DÞj2 ¼ X23  x2  ½X21  2  X3  X4 ðDÞ  x4


þ fN224  N242  X24 ðDÞ þ 2  X1  X2 ðDÞg  x6
þ fN222 þ 2  N24  N42  X22 ðDÞg  x8 þ x10

We define the following parameters for simplicity: U0 ¼ 0; U2 ¼ X23

U4 ¼ ½X21  2  X3  X4 ðDÞ; U6 ¼ N224  N242  X24 ðDÞ þ 2  X1  X2 ðDÞ

U8 ¼ N222 þ 2  N24  N42  X22 ðDÞ; U10 ¼ 1. Hence Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 implies


P
5
U2k  x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving the polynomial.
k¼0
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 365

Furthermore

PR ði  x; DÞ ¼ N22  x4 ; PI ði  x; DÞ ¼ ½N24  N42  x3 þ x5 


QR ði  x; DÞ ¼ X1  x2 þ X2 ðDÞ  x4 ; QI ði  x; DÞ ¼ X3  x  X4 ðDÞ  x3

Hence

PR ði  x; DÞ  QI ði  x; DÞ þ PI ði  x; DÞ  QR ði  x; DÞ
sin hðDÞ ¼
jQði  x; DÞj2
PR ði  x; DÞ  QR ði  x; DÞ þ PI ði  x; DÞ  QI ði  x; DÞ
cos hðDÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; DÞj2
N22  x  ½X3  x  X4 ðDÞ  x3   ½N24  N42  x3 þ x5   ½X1  x2 þ X2 ðDÞ  x4 
4
sin hðDÞ ¼ 2 2
X3  x þ ½X21  2  X3  X4 ðDÞ  x4 þ ½X24 ðDÞ  2  X1  X2 ðDÞ  x6 þ X22 ðDÞ  x8
N22  x4  ½X1  x2 þ X2 ðDÞ  x4   ½N24  N42  x3 þ x5   ½X3  x  X4 ðDÞ  x3 
cos hðDÞ ¼ 
X23  x2 þ ½X21  2  X3  X4 ðDÞ  x4 þ ½X24 ðDÞ  2  X1  X2 ðDÞ  x6 þ X22 ðDÞ  x8

P
Which jointly with Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 ) 5k¼0 U2k  x2k ¼ 0 that are continuous and
differentiable in Δ, based on Lema 1and Hence we use theorem 1. This proves the
theorem 2.
Lemma 1 Assume that ω(Δ) is a positive and real root of Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 defined for
D 2 I, which is continuous and differentiable. Assume further that if k ¼ i  x
x 2 R then Pn ðk ¼ i  x; DÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; DÞ 6¼ 0; D 2 R hold true. Then the
functions Sn ðDÞ; n 2 N0 are continuous and differentiable on I.
Theorem 1 Assume that ω(Δ) is a positive real root of Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 defined for
D 2 I; I R þ 0 , and at some D 2 I, Sn ðD Þ ¼ 0. For some n 2 N0 then a pair of
simple conjugate pure imaginary roots k þ ðD Þ ¼ i  xðD Þ; k ðD Þ ¼ i  xðD Þ.
Dðk; DÞ ¼ 0 exist at D ¼ D which crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if
dðD Þ [ 0 and cross the imaginary axis from right to left if dðD Þ\0 where

dRek dSn ðDÞ


dðD Þ ¼ signf jk¼ixðD Þ g ¼ signfFx ðxðD Þ; D Þg  signf j  g:
dD dD D¼D
Theorem 2 The characteristic equation has a pair of simple and conjugate pure
imaginary roots k ¼ xðD Þ; xðD Þ real at D 2 I if Sn ðD Þ ¼ D  Dn ðD Þ ¼ 0
for some n 2 N0 . If xðD Þ ¼ x þ ðD Þ this pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary
roots crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if d þ ðD Þ [ 0 and crosses
the imaginary axis from right to left if d þ ðD Þ\0 where d þ ðD Þ ¼
signfdRe k
dD jk¼ix þ ðD Þ g


 dSn ðDÞ
d ðD Þ ¼ signfd Rek j
þ dD
 g ¼ signf
k¼ix þ ðD Þ j  g. If xðD Þ ¼ x ðD Þ these
dD D¼D 
pair of simple conjugates pure imaginary roots cross the imaginary axis from left to
right if d ðD Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from right to left if d ðD Þ\0
dSn ðDÞ
where d ðD Þ ¼ signfd Re k
dD jk¼ix ðD Þ g ¼ signf dD jD¼D g.
  If x þ ðD Þ ¼
x ðD Þ ¼ xðD Þ then DðD Þ ¼ 0 and signfdRek j
  g ¼ 0, the same is true
dD k¼ixðD Þ
366 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

when S0n ðD Þ ¼ 0. The following result can be useful in identifying values of Δ
where stability switches happened.
Our IMPATT amplifier homogenous system for i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1 leads to a char-
acteristic equation for the eigenvalue λ having the form (second case)
Pðk; DÞ þ Qðk; DÞ  ekD ¼ 0. Dðs1 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D; kÞ ¼ DðD; kÞ and we use
P ðkDÞn
Taylor series approximation: ekD 1 n¼0 n! 1  k  D the Maclaurin ser-
kD
ies is a Taylor series expansion of a e function about zero (0). We get the
following general characteristic equation DðD; kÞ under Taylor series
approximation:
ekD 1  k  D.

Dðs1 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D; kÞ ¼ DðD; kÞ ¼ N24  N42  k3 þ N22  k4  k5


þ fðN24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ
 k þ ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31
Rload
þ N13  N31   N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ
Lf
Rload
 k2 þ f  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13  N31  N13  N31
Lf
Rload Rload Rload
  Dg  k3 þ fN11    D  N11 g  k4 g  ekD
Lf Lf Lf

We use different parameters terminology from our last characteristics param-


eters definition: pj ðDÞ ! aj ; qj ðDÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 5; m ¼ 4; n [ m.

X
5 X
4
Pn ðk; DÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; DÞ ! QðkÞ; PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j
j¼0 j¼0

PðkÞ ¼ N24  N42  k3 þ N22  k4  k5


QðkÞ ¼ ðN24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ  k
þ ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31
Rload
  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ  k2
Lf
Rload
þf  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13
Lf
Rload Rload Rload
 N31  N13  N31   Dg  k3 þ fN11    D  N11 g  k4
Lf Lf Lf

n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m and aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable function


of Δ such that a0 þ c0 ¼ 0. In the following “─” denotes complex conjugate. P(λ),
Q(λ) are analytic functions in λ and differentiable in Δ. The coefficients:
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 367

faj ðCf ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . .Þ and cj ðCf ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . .Þg 2 R


are dependent on IMPATT amplifier system’s Cf ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . .
values.
We already got the following expressions: a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a5 ¼ 1

a2 ¼ 0; a3 ¼ N24  N42 ; a4 ¼ N22 ; c0 ¼ 0; c1


¼ N24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42
c2 ¼ N11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31
Rload
  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42
Lf
Rload
c3 ¼  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13  N31  N13  N31
Lf
Rload Rload Rload
  D; c4 ¼ N11    D  N11
Lf Lf Lf

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the variation arguments


ðCf ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . .Þ will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj . The
coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their arguments,
and direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 ¼ 0. In our case λ = 0 is a root of
characteristic equation. Furthermore, P(λ), Q(λ) are analytic function of λ of the
analysis [5] can also be verified in the present case [6].
Remark: In our case Pn ðk ¼ 0; DÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ 0; DÞ ¼ p0 ðDÞ þ q0 ðDÞ ¼
a0 þ c0 ¼ 08 D 2 R þ 0 and λ = 0 is a characteristic root of Dðk; DÞ ¼ 0. It is
against general geometric criterion [BK]. But we inspect our analysis for λ 6¼ 0.
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0, that is P and Q have no
common imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
ðCf ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . .Þ domain interest.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1; Rek
0, No roots bifurcation from ∞.
Indeed, in the limit:

ðN24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ  k


þ ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31
Rload
  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ  k2
Lf
Rload Rload
þf  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13  N31  N13  N31   Dg  k3
Lf Lf
Rload Rload
þ fN11    D  N11 g  k4
QðkÞ Lf Lf
j j¼j j
PðkÞ N24  N42  k3 þ N22  k4  k5
368 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

ðN24  N31  N42  N13 þ N14  N23  N31  N42 Þ


þ ðN11  N24  N42 þ N12  N23  N31 þ N13  N31
Rload
  N13  N22  N31 þ N14  N21  N42 Þ  k
Lf
Rload
þf  N11  N22  N11 þ N12  N21 þ N13
Lf
Rload
 N31  N13  N31   Dg  k2
Lf
Rload Rload
þ fN11    D  N11 g  k3
QðkÞ Lf Lf
j j¼j j
PðkÞ N24  N42  k2 þ N22  k3  k4

FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 :


Fðx; DÞ ¼ jPði  x; DÞj2  jQði  x; DÞj2
ðcÞ ¼ X23  x2  ½X21  2  X3  X4 ðDÞ  x4
þ fN224  N242  X24 ðDÞ þ 2  X1  X2 ðDÞg  x6
þ fN222 þ 2  N24  N42  X22 ðDÞg  x8 þ x10
It has at most a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in ω
(degree in ω10).
(d) Each positive root xðCf ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . .Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is contin-
uous and differentiable with respect to Cf ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . This
condition can only be assessed numerically.
In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have
Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ:
And Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ thus k ¼ i  x; x [ 0 may be on eigenvalue of
characteristic equation. The analysis consists in identifying the roots of character-
istic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex λ-plane, whereby
increasing the parameters Cf ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . Reλ may, at the crossing,
0ðÞ 0ðÞ ðÞ
change its sign from (-) to (+), that is, from a stable focus E ðÞ ðI1 ; I3 ; I1 ;
dVP
ðÞ ðÞ ðÞ 1
ðÞ
I3 ; IL1 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; I1 ; CP dt
CP  I1 ; IL1 Þ to an unstable one, or vice versa. This
1 2

feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with
respect to Cf ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . and system parameters.
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 369

@Rek
K1 ðRf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Cf ; Lf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . ¼ const
@Rf k¼ix
@Rek
K1 ðLf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Cf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . ¼ const
@Lf k¼ix
@Rek
K1 ðCf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . ¼ const
@Cf k¼ix
@Rek
K1 ðCd Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . ¼ const
@Cd k¼ix
@Rek
K1 ðRd Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Cd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . ¼ const
@Rd k¼ix
@Rek
K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Cd ; R1 ; L1 ; Rd ; . . . ¼ const
@D k¼ix

For the second case s1 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D we got the following results:

PR ði  x; DÞ ¼ N22  x4 ; PI ði  x; DÞ ¼ ½N24  N42  x3 þ x5 


QR ði  x; DÞ ¼ X1  x2 þ X2 ðDÞ  x4 ; QI ði  x; DÞ ¼ X3  x  X4 ðDÞ  x3
U0 ¼ 0; U2 ¼ X23 ; U4 ¼ ½X21  2  X3  X4 ðDÞ;
U6 ¼ N224  N242  X24 ðDÞ þ 2  X1  X2 ðDÞ
U8 ¼ N222 þ 2  N24  N42  X22 ðDÞ; U10 ¼ 1;
X
5
Fðx; DÞ ¼ jPði  x; DÞj2  jQði  x; DÞj2 ¼ U2k  x2k
k¼0

P5
Hence Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 U2k  x
2k
¼ 0. When writing PðkÞ ¼
PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, inserting k ¼ i  x into IMPATT
amplifier system’s characteristic equation, ω must satisfy the following:

PR ði  x; DÞ  QI ði  x; DÞ þ PI ði  x; DÞ  QR ði  x; DÞ
sin x  D ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  x; DÞj2

PR ði  x; DÞ  QR ði  x; DÞ þ PI ði  x; DÞ  QI ði  x; DÞ
cos x  D ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; DÞj2

where jQði  x; DÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above sin x  D and cos x  D equations that, by squaring
and adding the sides, ω must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2 
jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note that FðxÞ is dependent of Δ. Now it is important to notice that if D 62 I
(assume that I R þ 0 is the set where xðDÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for,
D 62 I,xðDÞ is not defined, then for all Δ in I xðDÞ satisfies that FðxÞ ¼ 0) . Then
370 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

There are no positive xðDÞ solutions for Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have
stability switches. For any D 2 I, where xðDÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0,
we can define the angle hðDÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of sin hðDÞ ¼
   ; cos hðDÞ ¼    And the relation between the argument hðDÞ and xðDÞ  D for
D 2 I must be xðDÞ  D ¼ hðDÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps
Dn : I ! R þ 0 given by Dn ðDÞ ¼ hðDÞxðDÞ þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; D 2 I. Let as introduce the
functions I ! R; Sn ðDÞ ¼ D  Dn ðDÞ; D 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and dif-
ferentiable in Δ. In the following, the subscripts k; x; Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; . . .
indicate the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on KðxÞ,
remember in kðLf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; . . .Þ and xðLf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; . . .Þ, and
keeping all parameters except (x) and Δ. The derivation closely follows that in
reference [BK]. Differentiating IMPATT amplifier system characteristic equation
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  ekD ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and inverting the
derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark:

x ¼ Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; . . .; etc:;

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  D  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ

where Pk ¼ @P
@k …etc., Substituting k ¼ i  x and bearing i  Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ
Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ; i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ; i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ and that
on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtain the following expression:

@k 1 i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  D  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þ jk¼ix ¼
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ;


Q ¼ QR þ i  QI

Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; P2


¼ P2R þ P2I

When (x) can be any IMPATT diode active circulator system’s parameter Lf, Rf,
Cf,… and time delay Δ etc.,. Where for convenience, we dropped the arguments
(i∙ω, x), and where Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ; xx ¼ Fx =Fx We define
U and V:
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 371

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = Δ.

PR ¼ PR ði  x; DÞ ¼ N22  x4 ; PI ¼PI ði  x; DÞ ¼ ½N24  N42  x3 þ x5 


QR ¼ QR ði  x; DÞ ¼ X1  x2 þ X2 ðDÞ  x4 ; QI ¼QI ði  x; DÞ ¼ X3  x  X4 ðDÞ  x3

PRx ¼ 4  N22  x3 ; PIx ¼ ½N24  N42  3  x2 þ 5  x4 ;


QRx ¼ X1  2  x þ X2 ðDÞ  4  x3
QIx ¼ X3  X4 ðDÞ  3  x2 ; PRD ¼ 0; PID ¼ 0;
@X2 ðDÞ 4 @X4 ðDÞ 3
QRD ¼  x ; QID ¼  x
@D @D
@X2 ðDÞ Rload @X4 ðDÞ Rload
xD ¼ FD =Fx ; ¼  N11 ; ¼ N13  N31 
@D Lf @D Lf

Rload Rload
QRD ¼   N11  x4 ; QID ¼ N13  N31   x3 ; FD ¼ 2  ðQRD  QR þ QID  QI Þ
Lf Lf
PRx  PR ¼ 4  N222  x7 ; PIx  PI ¼ ½N24  N42  3 þ 5  x2   ½N24  N42 þ x2   x5
QRx  QR ¼ 2  ½X1 þ X2 ðDÞ  2  x2   ½X1 þ X2 ðDÞ  x2   x3
QIx  QI ¼ ½X3  X4 ðDÞ  3  x2   ½X3  X4 ðDÞ  x2   x; PRD  PR þ PID  PI ¼ 0
PID  PI ¼ 0; PRD  PR ¼ 0; FD ¼ 2  ½ðPRD  PR þ PID  PI Þ  ðQRD  QR þ QID  QI Þ

Rload
QRD  QR ¼   N11  ðX1 þ X2 ðDÞ  x2 Þ  x6 ;
Lf
Rload
QID  QI ¼ N13  N31   ½X3  X4 ðDÞ  x2   x4
Lf
Rload
FD ¼ 2  f  N11  ðX1 þ X2 ðDÞ  x2 Þ  x2
Lf
Rload
þ N13  N31   ½X3  X4 ðDÞ  x2 g  x4
Lf
PR  PIx ¼ N22  ½N24  N42  3 þ 5  x2   x6 ;
PI  PRx ¼ 4  ½N24  N42 þ x2   N22  x6
QR  QIx ¼ ½X1 þ X2 ðDÞ  x2   ½X3  X4 ðDÞ  3  x2   x2
QI  QRx ¼ ½X3  X4 ðDÞ  x2   ½X1 þ X2 ðDÞ  2  x2   2  x2
372 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

V ¼ ðPR  PID  PI  PRD Þ  ðQR  QID  QI  QRD Þ; PR  PID  PI  PRD ¼ 0


Rload
V ¼ ðQR  QID  QI  QRD Þ ¼ ð½X1  x2 þ X2 ðDÞ  x4   N13  N31   x3
Lf
Rload
 ½X3  x  X4 ðDÞ  x3   ½  N11  x4 Þ
Lf
Rload Rload
V ¼ ð½X1 þ X2 ðDÞ  x2   N13  N31   x5 þ ½X3  X4 ðDÞ  x2    N11  x5 Þ
Lf Lf

F(ω, Δ) = 0. Differentiating with respect to Δ and we get

@x @x FD
Fx  þ FD ¼ 0; D 2 I ) ¼ ;
@D @D Fx
@Rek @x FD
K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þ ; ¼ xD ¼ 
@D k¼ix @D Fx
2  ½U þ D  jPj2  þ i  Fx @Rek
K1 ðDÞ ¼ Ref ; sign K1 ðDÞg ¼ signfð Þ g
2
FD þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj  @D k¼ix

U@x
@D þ V
sign K1 ðDÞg ¼ signfFx g signfD  @x
@D þ x þ jPj2
g. We shall presently
examine the possibility of stability transition (bifurcations) of our system, about the
dVP
0ðÞ 0ðÞ ðÞ ðÞ ðÞ ðÞ 1
ðÞ
equilibrium point E ðÞ ðI1 ; I3 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; I1 ; CP dt
CP  I1 ; IL1 Þ as
1 2

a result of a variation of delay parameter Δ. The analysis consists in identifying the


roots of our system characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the
complex λ-plane whereby increasing the delay parameter Δ, Reλ may at the
crossing, change its sign from – to +, that is, from a stable focus E(*) to an unstable
one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of
the partial derivatives with respect to Δ.

@Rek @Rek
K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þ ; K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; . . .
@D k¼ix @D k¼ix
¼ const; x 2 R þ

Numerical analysis: We get the expression for Fðx; DÞ system parameters val-
ues. We find those ω, Δ values which fulfil Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,
complex, and imaginary values of ω for specific Δ values. D 2 ½0:001. . .10 and we
can express by 3D function Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0. We plot the stability switch diagram
based on different delay values of our system.
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 373

@Rek 2  ½U þ D  jPj2  þ i  Fx
K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@D FD þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 
@Rek 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  FD  ðU þ D  P2 Þg
K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@D FD2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2

The stability switch occur only on those delay values (Δ) which fit the equation:
D ¼ xh þþ ðDÞ
ðDÞ and h þ ðDÞ is the solution of sin hðDÞ ¼    ; cos hðDÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðDÞ if only ω+ is feasible. Additionally, when system’s parameters are known
and the stability switch due to various time delay values Δ is described in the
following expression: (Steven 1994).

signfK1 ðDÞg ¼ signfFx ðxðDÞ; DÞg


UðxðDÞÞ  xD ðxðDÞÞ þ VðxðDÞÞ
signfD  xD ðxðDÞÞ þ xðDÞ þ g
jPðxðDÞÞj2

Remark: We know Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 implies it roots xi ðDÞ and finding those delays
values Δ which ωi is feasible. There are Δ values which ωi is complex or imaginary
number, then unable to analyze stability [6, 19, 32].

3.5 Multistage IMPATT Amplifier System Microstrip


Delayed in Time Stability Switching Analysis

In many applications there is a use of multistage IMPATT amplifier.


Multistage IMPATT amplifier is constructed from many single circulator/IMPATT
diode amplifier which are connected as a chain structure. Each circulator/IMPATT
diode amplifier gets the RF signal from the previous amplifier unit and after
amplification feeds the RF signal to the next amplifier unit. In that multistage
IMPATT amplifier structure we use two modes of operation as an amplifier. The
first is the negative resistance mode, where the input signal entering the IMPATT
through the circulator is amplified due to the negative resistance phenomena in the
IMPATT. The amplified signal passes out of the diode through the same port at
which the input signal entered, and because of the circulator, passes into the output
line. The second is the injection locked mode. The IMPATT is biases so that it is
oscillating all the time, but the frequency is locked to the input frequency and the
power leaving the IMPATT is at the same frequency as the input. If we compare the
two modes bandwidth, the negative resistance mode provides the optimal band-
width and the bandwidth of an injection locked amplifier is only few percent. The
efficiency of the injection locked mode is greater than the efficiency of negative
resistance mode. In multistage IMPATT amplifier, all the amplifier unit’s mode of
operation is negative resistance except the last amplifier unit (output stage) which
the mode of operation is injection locked mode.
374 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

Fig. 3.15 Multistage IMPATT amplifier circuit

Fig. 3.16 Multistage IMPATT amplifier circuit with microstrip delay lines

Remark: we neglect the microstrip time delay which is connected between each
stage circulator port 2 to IMPATT diode [70–72].
D1, D2, …, Dn are IMPATT diodes. Each single circulator/IMPATT diode
amplifier is connected to the next amplifier unit by microstrip line. We characterize
each microstrip segment as a delay line. We define our multistage IMPATT
amplifier with additional n delay lines, s1 ; . . .; sn which represent (n) microstrip
segments. We neglect the voltages on delay lines Vsi ! e 8 s1 ; . . .; sn ; 1  i  n.
There is a delay in the current which flow through each microstrip delay line
IðtÞ ! Iðt  si Þ 8 1  i  n.
3.5 Multistage IMPATT Amplifier System … 375

The input current to circuit stage (i) is define as Iin(i)(t) and the output current to
circuit stage (i) is define as Iout(i)(t). The transfer function from circuit stage (i) input
current Iin(i)(t) to output current Iout(i)(t) is IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ fi ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ

8 1  i  n; IinðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutði1Þ ðt  si1 Þ; IoutðiÞ ðtÞ


¼ fi ðIoutði1Þ ðt  si1 Þ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ 8
2  i  n:Ioutð1Þ ðtÞ ¼ f1 ðIinð1Þ ðtÞ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ; Iinð1Þ ðtÞ ¼ gðXðtÞÞ:
Iinð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutð1Þ ðt  s1 Þ; Iinð3Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutð2Þ ðt  s2 Þ; Iinðn1Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutðn2Þ ðt  sn2 Þ
IinðnÞ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutðn1Þ ðt  sn1 Þ; IRL ðtÞ ¼ IoutðnÞ ðt  sn Þ;
Ioutð1Þ ðtÞ ¼ f1 ðgðXðtÞÞ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ:
Ioutð1Þ ðtÞ ¼ f1 ðIinð1Þ ðtÞ; D1 ; C1 ; L1 ; VB1 Þ; Iinð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutð1Þ ðt  s1 Þ;
Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ f2 ðIinð2Þ ðtÞ; D2 ; C2 ; L2 ; VB2 Þ
Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ f2 ðIoutð1Þ ðt  s1 Þ; D2 ; C2 ; L2 ; VB2 Þ; Iinð3Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutð2Þ ðt  s2 Þ;
Ioutð3Þ ðtÞ ¼ f3 ðIinð3Þ ðtÞ; D3 ; C3 ; L3 ; VB3 Þ
Iinðn1Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutðn2Þ ðt  sn2 Þ; Ioutðn1Þ ðtÞ ¼ fn1 ðIinðn1Þ ðtÞ; Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ
Ioutðn1Þ ðtÞ ¼ fn1 ðIoutðn2Þ ðt  sn2 Þ; Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ;
IinðnÞ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutðn1Þ ðt  sn1 Þ

IoutðnÞ ðtÞ ¼ fn ðIoutðn1Þ ðt  sn1 Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ;


IoutðnÞ ðtÞ ¼ fn ðIinðnÞ ðtÞ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ
IRL ðtÞ ¼ IoutðnÞ ðt  sn Þ; IRL ðtÞ ¼ fn ðIoutðn1Þ ðt  sn1  sn Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ
IRL ðtÞ ¼ fn ðfn1 ðIoutðn2Þ ðt  sn2  sn1  sn Þ;
Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ
Ioutðn1Þ ðt  sn1  sn Þ ¼ fn1 ðIinðn1Þ ðt  sn1  sn Þ;
Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ
Ioutðn1Þ ðt  sn1  sn Þ ¼ fn1 ðIoutðn2Þ ðt  sn2  sn1  sn Þ;
Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ

Ioutðn2Þ ðtÞ ¼ fn2 ðIinðn2Þ ðtÞ; Dn2 ; Ln2 ; Cn2 ; VBn2 Þ;


Iinðn2Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutðn3Þ ðt  sn3 Þ
Ioutðn2Þ ðtÞ ¼ fn2 ðIoutðn3Þ ðt  sn3 Þ; Dn2 ; Ln2 ; Cn2 ; VBn2 Þ
Ioutðn2Þ ðt  sn2  sn1  sn Þ ¼ fn2 ðIoutðn3Þ ðt  sn3  sn2  sn1  sn Þ;
Dn2 ; Ln2 ; Cn2 ; VBn2 Þ
X
n
Ioutðn2Þ ðt  sn2  sn1  sn Þ ¼ fn2 ðIoutðn3Þ ðt  sk Þ; Dn2 ; Ln2 ; Cn2 ; VBn2 Þ
k¼n3
376 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

IRL ðtÞ ¼ fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ðIoutðn3Þ ðt  sn3  sn2  sn1  sn Þ; Dn2 ; Ln2 ; Cn2 ; VBn2 Þ;
Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ
X n
IRL ðtÞ ¼ fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ðIoutðn3Þ ðt  sk Þ; Dn2 ; Ln2 ; Cn2 ; VBn2 Þ;
k¼n3
Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ
IRL ðtÞ ¼ fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ð. . .ðf1 ðIinð1Þ ðt  s1  s2 . . .  sn Þ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ. . .Þ
Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ
X
n
IRL ðtÞ ¼ fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ð. . .ðf1 ðIinð1Þ ðt  sk Þ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ. . .ÞDn1 ;
k¼1
Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ

IinðnkÞ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutðnðk þ 1ÞÞ ðt  snðk þ 1Þ Þ 8 k ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .; n  2


IinðnÞ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutðn1Þ ðt  sn1 Þ; . . .; Iinð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutð1Þ ðt  s1 Þ

Fig. 3.17 Multistage


IMPATT amplifier circuit
follow stages

Fig. 3.18 Multistage IMPATT amplifier circuit – n stages


3.5 Multistage IMPATT Amplifier System … 377

Fig. 3.19 IMPATT amplifier circuit and equivalent circuit

Multistage IMPATT amplifier one stage current transfer function: The transfer
function from circuit stage (i) input current Iin(i)(t) to output current Iout(i)(t) is
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ fi ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ. Circuit stage active circulator can be described
by system path from RFin port (P1) to RFout port (P3). For simplicity we ignore
MESFET high frequency equivalent model and took it as cutoff element in our
system. The equivalent circuit for one stage current transfer function is present in
the below figure. We ignore the circulator signal path from P3 to P1 since our
amplifier RF signal is feed directly to the next IMPATT amplifier stage. We con-
sider fully matching between two follow amplifier stages (stages i − 1 and i), no
signal reflections.

Branch 1: ICC ¼ ILf ¼ IRf ¼ ICf ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ; Branch 3: ICC ¼ ILf ¼ IRf ¼ ICf ¼
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ

dVRD dVRD dVRD


RD ¼ Rc ; Rc [ 0; RD \0; jRD j ¼ Rc ; \0; ¼ RD ¼Rd ; j j ¼ Rc
dIRD dIRD dIRD
dVCf dVCC dIinðiÞ ðtÞ
IinðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ Cf  ; IinðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ CC  ; VRf ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  Rf ; VLf ¼ Lf 
dt dt Z dt
dIL1 1
IinðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IC1 þ IoutðiÞ ðtÞ; ICd ¼ IRd ¼ IIMPATT ; VL1 ¼ L1  ) I L1 ¼ VL1  dt
dt L1

Branch 1: VP1 ¼ VCf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC þ VA ; Branch 3: VA ¼ VCf þ VLf þ VRf þ
VCC þ VP3
378 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

dVC1 dVCd
VA  VB ¼ VC1 ; IC1 ¼ C1  ; ICd ¼ Cd  ; IL1 þ IC1 ¼ IRd ; IC1 ¼ IRd  IL1
dt dt
dVRd dVRd
¼ ¼ Rd ; IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IC1 ;
dIRd dICd
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IC1 ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IRd þ IL1
Z
dVCd 1
ICd ¼ Cd  ) VCd ¼  ICd  dt;
dt Cd
Z
1
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IRd þ ðVBi  VB Þ  dt
L1
Z
1
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IRd þ VL1  dt; VL1 ¼ VBi  VB ;
L1
Z
1
VB ¼ VCd þ VRd ¼  ICd  dt þ VRd
Cd
Z
dVC1 dðVA  VB Þ 1
VA  VB ¼ VC1 ; IC1 ¼ C1  ; IC1 ¼ C1  ) VA  VB ¼  IC1  dt
dt dt C1
Z Z
1 1
VB ¼ VA   IC1  dt; IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IRd þ  ðVBi  VB Þ  dt; VBi  const
C1 L1
Z Z
1 1
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IRd þ  VBi  dt   VB  dt
L1 L
Z1
1 1
¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IRd þ  VBi  t   VB  dt
L1 L1
1 1
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IRd þ  VBi  t 
L1 L1
Z Z
1
 ½VA   IC1  dt  dt; IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IoutðiÞ ðtÞ
C1
VA ¼ VP1  ðVCf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC Þ@Branch1 ;
Z
dVCf 1
IinðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ Cf  ) V Cf ¼  IinðiÞ ðtÞ  dt
dt Cf
Z Z
1 dIinðiÞ ðtÞ 1
VA ¼ VP1  ð  IinðiÞ ðtÞ  dt þ Lf  þ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  Rf þ  IinðiÞ ðtÞ  dtÞ
Cf dt CC
dVA dVP1 1 d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ 1
¼  ½  IinðiÞ ðtÞ þ Lf  þ  Rf þ  IinðiÞ ðtÞ
dt dt Cf dt2 dt CC
dVA dVP1 1 1 d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ
¼  ½ð þ Þ  IinðiÞ ðtÞ þ Lf  þ  Rf 
dt dt CC Cf dt2 dt

We are interested to find out our IoutðiÞ ðtÞ expression.


3.5 Multistage IMPATT Amplifier System … 379

Z ZZ
1 1 1
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IRd þ  VBi  t   VA  dt þ  IC1  dt  dt
L1 L1 L1  C1
Z
dIoutðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ dIRd 1 1 1
¼  þ  VBi   VA þ  IC1  dt
dt dt dt L1 L1 L1  C1
Z
d dIoutðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ dIRd 1 1 1
f ¼  þ  VBi   VA þ  IC1  dtg
dt dt dt dt L1 L1 L1  C1

d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ d 2 IRd 1 dVBi 1 dVA 1 dVBi


¼  2 þ    þ  I C1 ; ¼0
dt 2 dt 2 dt L1 dt L1 dt L1  C1 dt

d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ d 2 IRd 1 dVA 1


ð Þ ¼  2   þ  ½IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IoutðiÞ ðtÞ
dt 2 dt 2 dt L1 dt L1  C1

dVA dVP1 1 1 d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ


ðÞ ¼  ½ð þ Þ  IinðiÞ ðtÞ þ Lf  þ  Rf 
dt dt CC Cf dt2 dt

We consider the assumption which the IMPATT/Circulator amplifier input


voltage VP1 ¼ C þ nðtÞ; C is constant voltage and nðtÞ is RF signal in time.

dVP1 dC dnðtÞ dC dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ


¼ þ ; ! 0; ! e Or ! X0  sgn½ 
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt

dVA dnðtÞ 1 1 d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ


¼ X0  sgn½   ½ð þ Þ  IinðiÞ ðtÞ þ Lf  þ  Rf 
dt dt CC Cf dt2 dt

dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ dnðtÞ


¼ sgn½ j j; 8 real 9j j ¼ sgn½ 
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt

dnðtÞ
dj j
dt ¼ sgn½dnðtÞ 8 dnðtÞ 6¼ 0; dVP1 ¼ 0 for dnðtÞ ¼ 0
dnðtÞ dt dt dt dt
d½ 
dt

dVP1 dnðtÞ dVP1 dnðtÞ


¼ X0 for [ 0; ¼ X0 for \0
dt dt dt dt
380 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

dVP1
Fig. 3.20 IMPATT amplifier circuit VP1 and dt functions of time

We neglect the IMPATT diode reciprocal negative resistance (dtd ½R1d  ! e)


characteristic slope changes over time.

d 2 IR d d dIR d dIR dVRd dIRd 1 d 2 IR d 1 dVRd


2
¼ ½ d ¼ ½ d  ; ¼ ; 2d ¼ ½  
dt dt dt dt dVRd dt dVRd Rd dt dt Rd dt
d 2 IR d d 1 dVRd d 1 dVRd 1 d 2 VRd d 1
¼ ½   ¼ ½   þ  ; ½ !e
dt2 dt Rd dt dt Rd dt Rd dt2 dt Rd
d 2 IR d 1 d 2 VRd 1 d dVRd dVRd d Rd d 2 IR
2
¼  2
¼  ½ ; ¼  Rd ; ! e; 2 d ! e
dt Rd dt Rd dt dt dt dt dt

d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ 1 dVA 1


ð Þ ¼   þ  ½IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IoutðiÞ ðtÞ
dt2 dt2 L1 dt L1  C1
3.5 Multistage IMPATT Amplifier System … 381

ðÞ ! ðÞ
d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ 1 dnðtÞ 1 1 d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ
¼   fX 0  sgn½   ½ð þ Þ  I inðiÞ ðtÞ þ L f 
dt2 dt2 L1 dt CC Cf dt2
dIinðiÞ ðtÞ 1
þ  Rf g þ  ½IinðiÞ ðtÞ  IoutðiÞ ðtÞ
dt L1  C1
d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ X0 dnðtÞ 1 1 1 Lf d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ
¼   sgn½  þ  ð þ Þ  I inðiÞ ðtÞ þ 
dt2 dt2 L1 dt L1 CC Cf L1 dt2
dIinðiÞ ðtÞ Rf 1 1
þ  þ  IinðiÞ ðtÞ   IoutðiÞ ðtÞ
dt L1 L1  C1 L1  C1
d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ 1 Lf d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ Rf dIinðiÞ ðtÞ
þ  IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ ð1 þ Þ  þ 
dt 2 L1  C1 L1 dt2 L1 dt
1 1 1 1 X0 dnðtÞ
þ  ½ð þ Þ þ   IinðiÞ ðtÞ   sgn½ 
L1 CC Cf C1 L1 dt

dVP1 dnðtÞ
Case I: dt ¼ 0 for dt ¼0

d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ 1 Lf d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ Rf dIinðiÞ ðtÞ 1


þ  IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ ð1 þ Þ  þ  þ
dt 2 L1  C1 L1 dt2 L1 dt L1
1 1 1
 ½ð þ Þ þ   IinðiÞ ðtÞ
CC Cf C1

dVP1 dnðtÞ
Case II: dt ¼ X0 for dt [0

d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ 1 Lf d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ Rf dIinðiÞ ðtÞ


þ  I outðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ ð1 þ Þ þ 
dt2 L1  C1 L1 dt2 L1 dt
1 1 1 1 X0
þ  ½ð þ Þ þ   IinðiÞ ðtÞ 
L1 CC Cf C1 L1

dVP1 dnðtÞ
Case III: dt ¼ X0 for dt \0

d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ 1 Lf d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ Rf dIinðiÞ ðtÞ


þ  I outðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ ð1 þ Þ þ 
dt2 L1  C1 L1 dt2 L1 dt
1 1 1 1 X0
þ  ½ð þ Þ þ   IinðiÞ ðtÞ þ
L1 CC Cf C1 L1
d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ
We define for simplicity a new function: w ¼ wð dt2 ; dt ; IinðiÞ ðtÞ; . . .Þ

Lf d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ Rf dIinðiÞ ðtÞ 1 1 1 1 X0


w ¼ ð1 þ Þ þ  þ  ½ð þ Þ þ   IinðiÞ ðtÞ 
L1 dt2 L1 dt L1 CC Cf C1 L1
dnðtÞ
 sgn½ 
dt
382 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ 1 d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ


þ  I outðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ wð ; ; IinðiÞ ðtÞ; . . .Þ
dt2 L1  C1 dt2 dt

Next it is reader exercise to find IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ fi ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ function.

3.6 FET Combined Biasing and Matching Circuit


Stability Analysis

FET RF transistor is biased by using two power supplies, one for VDS and the other
for VGS. Another way to bias microwave FET is to use source resistor. The source
resistor has the advantage of providing feedback to stabilize the FET performance
and requires only one power supply. Once the transistor has been properly biased, it
must be matched to microstrip transmission line. By implementing biasing and
matching elements to RF microwave FET, each electrode must be simultaneously
connected to an RF circuit and a DC circuit, and the two circuits must not interfere.
The required isolation between the biasing and the matching circuit is done with RF
chocks (which pass the DC and block the RF) and coupling capacitors which pass
RF and block DC [33, 34, 62].
Cin—Input coupling capacitor. It allows the input microwave signal X(t) to enter
the transistor gate but prevents the input microstrip line from shorting out the gate
bias voltage.
Lin—We use RF chock because the gate must be connected to DC ground, but
the RF must not leak through this ground.
The RF FET source port is connected to RF ground through coupling capacitor
Cs which allows the FET source to be at RF ground. It allows the biasing source
resistor Rs to be used between the source and DC ground.
The FET drain port is connected to the drain resistor Rd through RF choke Ld,
which is connected to the positive supply voltage Vdd. The RF choke Ld presents

Fig. 3.21 FET combined biasing and matching circuit


3.6 FET Combined Biasing and Matching Circuit Stability Analysis 383

the microwave signal from being shorted out by the drain resistor Rd and the power
supply Vdd. Coupling capacitor Cout allows the RF microwave signal to pass into
the output microstrip line and the load Rload, but prevents the output microstrip line,
which is a DC ground from shorting out the drain voltage. We represent our circuit
microstrip elements as a delay lines Tau1, Tau2, Tau3, Tau4 (s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; s4 ).
We neglect the voltages on delay lines Vsi ! e 8 s1 ; . . .; s4 ; 1  i  4. There
is a delay in the current which flow through each microstrip delay line
IðtÞ ! Iðt  si Þ 8 1  i  4. Next is to investigate how these delay line elements
influence our circuit performance and stability. Input and output matching circuits
can be π or T models. We use for our analysis the FET small signal equivalent
circuit (reduced version) and input and output T matching network. We give dif-
ferent name to RF chocke Ld, Ldd (Ld is the FET small signal equivalent circuit
drain inductance) and drain resistor Rd, Rdd (Rd is the FET small signal equivalent
circuit drain resistance). Ld ! Ldd ; Rd ! Rdd . Since we neglect the voltages on the
delay lines Vsi ! e 8 s1 ; . . .; s4 ; 1  i  4 the voltages on each delay line’s ports is
the same (consider it like a short contact). We write the FET small signal equivalent
circuit for our analysis:

dðVA2  VA3 Þ VA  VA8


ICin1 ¼ Cin1  ; IRd ¼ 7 ; IRi ¼ ICgs
dt Rd
dðVA1  VA2 Þ
ICin ¼ Cin  ; ICin1 ðtÞ ¼ ICin ðt  s1 Þ; VA1 ¼ XðtÞ;
dt
dILin1 dðVA3  VA4 Þ dILin
VA3 ¼ Lin1  ; ICin2 ¼ Cin2  ; VA4 ¼ Lin 
dt dt dt
dILg
VA4  VA5 ¼ VLg ¼ Lg  ; ICin ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ICin1 ðtÞ
dt
¼ ILin1 ðtÞ þ ICin2 ðtÞ; ICin2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ILin ðtÞ þ ILg ðtÞ
dVA5
ICpgs ¼ Cpgs  ; ILg ¼ IRg þ ICpgs ; ICgs ¼ IRi ;
dt
VA  VA6 dðVA6  VA7 Þ
IRg ¼ 5 ; ICgd ¼ Cgd 
Rg dt
dV
IRg ¼ ICgd þ ICgs ; V ¼ VA6  VA9 ; ICgs ¼ Cgs  ;
dt
VA  VA15
IRi ¼ 9 ; ICgd ¼ Id þ ICds þ IRds þ IRd
Ri
dðVA7  VA15 Þ VA  VA15
ICds ¼ Cds  ; IRds ¼ 7 ;
dt Rds
VA  VA16 dIL
IRd ¼ ILd þ ICpds ; IRs ¼ 15 ; VA16 ¼ VLS ¼ LS  S
RS dt
dVA8 dILd
IRS ¼ ILS ; ICpds ¼ Cpds  ; VLd ¼ VA8  VA10 ¼ Ld  ;
dt dt
Vdd  VA11
IRdd ¼ ILdd ; ¼ IRdd
Rdd
384 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

Fig. 3.22 FET combined biasing and matching equivalent circuit

dILdd
VA11  VA10 ¼ Ldd  ; ILd ðt  s3 Þ þ ILdd ðt  s3 Þ
dt
dðVA10  VA12 Þ
¼ ICout1 ðtÞ ; ICout1 ¼ Cout1 
dt
dILout1
VA12 ¼ Lout1  ;
dt
dðVA12  VA13 Þ
ICout1 ¼ ILout1 þ ICout2 ; ICout2 ¼ Cout2  ; ICout ðtÞ ¼ ICout2 ðt  s4 Þ
dt
dðVA13  VA14 Þ VA
ICout ¼ IRload ; ICout ¼ Cout  ; IRload ¼ 14 ; VO ¼ VA14
dt Rload

We write FET small signal equivalent circuit’s Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL)
for circuit’s node A2, A3,…,A16.

Table 3.11 FET combined biasing and matching equivalent circuit’s Kirchhoff’s Current Law
(KCL) and expressions
KCL @ Ax (x = 2,…,16) Expression of Kirchhoff’s current law
1 A2 ICin1 ðtÞ ¼ ICin ðt  s1 Þ
2 A3 ICin ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ICin1 ðtÞ ¼ ILin1 ðtÞ þ ICin2 ðtÞ
3 A4 ICin2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ILin ðtÞ þ ILg ðtÞ
4 A5 ILg ¼ IRg þ ICpgs
5 A6 IRg ¼ ICgd þ ICgs
6 A7 ICgd ¼ Id þ ICds þ IRds þ IRd
7 A8 IRd ¼ ILd þ ICpds
8 A9 ICgs ¼ IRi
9 A10 ILd ðt  s3 Þ þ ILdd ðt  s3 Þ ¼ ICout1 ðtÞ
10 A11 IRdd ¼ ILdd
(continued)
3.6 FET Combined Biasing and Matching Circuit Stability Analysis 385

Table 3.11 (continued)


KCL @ Ax (x = 2,…,16) Expression of Kirchhoff’s current law
11 A12 ICout1 ¼ ILout1 þ ICout2
12 A13 ICout ðtÞ ¼ ICout2 ðt  s4 Þ
13 A14 ICout ¼ IRload
14 A15 IRS ¼ IRi þ Id þ ICds þ IRds
15 A16 IRS ¼ ILS

d d
ICin ¼ Cin  ðVA1  VA2 Þ ¼ Cin  ðXðtÞ  VA2 Þ;
dt dt
d d dIL
ICin1 ¼ Cin1  ðVA2  VA3 Þ ¼ Cin1  ðVA2  Lin1  in1 Þ
dt dt dt
dXðtÞ dVA2 dVA2 d 2 ILin1
ICin ¼ Cin  ð  Þ; ICin1 ¼ Cin1  ð  Lin1  Þ;
dt dt dt dt2
1 dXðtÞ dVA2
 ICin ¼ 
Cin dt dt
dVA2 dXðtÞ 1 1 dVA2 d 2 ILin1
¼   ICin ;  ICin1 ¼  Lin1 
dt dt Cin Cin1 dt dt2
2
dVA2 1 d ILin1
) ¼  ICin1 þ Lin1 
dt Cin1 dt2
dXðtÞ 1 1 d 2 ILin1
  ICin ¼  ICin1 þ Lin1  ;
dt Cin Cin1 dt2
d d dIL dIL
ICin2 ¼ Cin2  ðVA3  VA4 Þ ¼ Cin2  ðLin1  in1  Lin  in Þ
dt dt dt dt
d 2 ILin1 d 2 ILin
ICin2 ¼ Cin2  ðLin1   Lin  2 Þ;
dt2 dt Z
dILg dILin 1 dIL
VA4  VA5 ¼ Lg  ) Lin    ICpgs  dt ¼ Lg  g
dt dt Cpgs dt
d 2 ILin 1 d 2 I Lg d
Lin  2
  I C pgs
¼ Lg  2
; ICds ¼ Cds  ðVA7  VA15 Þ;
dt Cpgs dt dt
VA7  VA15
IRds ¼ ) IRds  Rds ¼ VA7  VA15
Rds
Z
dIR 1 1
ICds ¼ Cds  Rds  ds ; VA5 ¼  ICpgs  dt; VA8 ¼
dt Cpgs Cpds
Z Z
1
 ICpds  dt; VA6 ¼  ICpgs  dt  IRg  Rg
Cpgs
386 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

Z
1 d 1
VA 7 ¼ I R d  Rd þ  ICpds  dt; ICgd ¼ Cgd  ½
Cpds dt Cpgs
Z Z
1
 ICpgs  dt  IRg  Rg  IRd  Rd   ICpds  dt
Cpds
1 1 dIR dIR
ICgd ¼ Cgd  ½  ICpgs   ICpds  Rg  g  Rd  d ;
Cpgs Cpds dt dt
dIRS
VA15 ¼ IRs  Rs þ LS 
Z dt
1 dIR 1 dIR
V¼  ICgs  dt; Ri  i ¼  ICpgs  Rg  g
Cgs dt Cpgs dt
dIRS d 2 IR 1
 RS   LS  2 S   ICgs
dt dt Cgs
dICgs 1 dIR dIR d 2 IR 1
IRi ¼ ICgs ; Ri  ¼  ICpgs  Rg  g  RS  S  LS  2 S   ICgs
dt Cpgs dt dt dt Cgs
Z Z
1 1 dIL
VA 8 ¼  ICpds  dt; VA10 ¼  ICpds  dt  Ld  d ; VA11 ¼ Vdd  Rdd  IRdd
Cpds Cpds dt
Z
1 dILd dILdd
Vdd  Rdd  IRdd   ICpds  dt þ Ld  ¼ Ldd 
Cpds dt dt
Z
d 1 dILd d dIL
fVdd  Rdd  IRdd   ICpds  dt þ Ld  g ¼ fLdd  dd g
dt Cpds dt dt dt
dVdd dIR 1 d 2 IL d 2 ILdd dVdd
 Rdd  dd   ICpds þ Ld  2 d ¼ Ldd  ; ¼0
dt dt Cpds dt dt2 dt
dIRdd 1 d 2 IL d 2 ILdd
 Rdd    ICpds þ Ld  2 d ¼ Ldd 
dt Cpds dt dt2
Z Z
1 1 dIL
VA 8 ¼  ICpds  dt; VA10 ¼  ICpds  dt  Ld  d
Cpds Cpds dt
Z
d 1 dILd dILout1
ICout1 ¼ Cout1  ½  ICpds  dt  Ld   Lout1  
dt Cpds dt dt
1 d 2 IL d 2 ILout1
¼ Cout1  ½  ICpds  Ld  2 d  Lout1  
Cpds dt dt2
Z
dIL 1
VA12 ¼ Lout1  out1 ; VA14 ¼ IRload  Rload ; VA13 ¼  ICout  dt þ IRload  Rload
dt Cout
Z
d dILout1 1
ICout2 ¼ Cout2  ½Lout1    ICout  dt  IRload  Rload 
dt dt Cout
d 2 ILout1 1 dIR
¼ Cout2  ½Lout1    ICout  Rload  load 
dt2 Cout dt
2
d ILout1 1 dIR
ICout2 ¼ ICout ¼ IRload ; ICout2 ¼ Cout2  ½Lout1    ICout  Rload  load 
dt2 Cout dt
d 2 ILout1 1 dIRload
IRload ¼ Cout2  ½Lout1    IRload  Rload  
dt2 Cout dt
3.6 FET Combined Biasing and Matching Circuit Stability Analysis 387

Our system equations with delays:

ICin1 ðtÞ ¼ ICin ðt  s1 Þ ; ILd ðt  s3 Þ þ ILdd ðt  s3 Þ ¼ ICout1 ðtÞ


ICin ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ICin1 ðtÞ ¼ ILin1 ðtÞ þ ICin2 ðtÞ;
ICin2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ILin ðtÞ þ ILg ðtÞ ; ICout ðtÞ ¼ ICout2 ðt  s4 Þ

We can summery our system differential equations:

dXðtÞ 1 1 d 2 ILin1 d 2 ILin1 d 2 ILin


  ICin ¼  ICin1 þ Lin1  ; I C in2
¼ Cin2  ðL in1   L in  Þ
dt Cin Cin1 dt2 dt2 dt2
d 2 IL 1 d 2 IL dIR
Lin  2 in   ICpgs ¼ Lg  2 g ; ICds ¼ Cds  Rds  ds
dt Cpgs dt dt
1 1 dIRg dIRd
ICgd ¼ Cgd  ½  ICpgs   ICpds  Rg   Rd  
Cpgs Cpds dt dt

dICgs 1 dIR dIR d 2 IR 1


Ri  ¼  ICpgs  Rg  g  RS  S  LS  2 S   ICgs
dt Cpgs dt dt dt Cgs
dIRdd 1 d 2 IL d 2 ILdd
 Rdd    ICpds þ Ld  2 d ¼ Ldd 
dt Cpds dt dt2
1 d 2 IL d 2 ILout1
ICout1 ¼ Cout1  ½  ICpds  Ld  2 d  Lout1  ;
Cpds dt dt2
d 2 ILout1 1 dIR
IRload ¼ Cout2  ½Lout1  2
  IRload  Rload  load 
dt Cout dt

We implement delay variables in the above system differential equations:

dXðtÞ 1 1 d 2 ILin1
  ICin ¼  ICin ðt  s1 Þ þ Lin1  ; ICin2
dt Cin Cin1 dt2
d ½ICin ðt  s1 Þ  ICin2 ðtÞ
2
d 2 ILin
¼ Cin2  ðLin1   L in  Þ
dt2 dt2

d 2 ILin 1 d 2 ½ICin2 ðt  s2 Þ  ILin ðtÞ dIR


Lin  2
  ICpgs ¼ Lg  2
; ICds ¼ Cds  Rds  ds
dt Cpgs dt dt

1 1 dIR dIR
ICgd ¼ Cgd  ½  ICpgs   ICpds  Rg  g  Rd  d 
Cpgs Cpds dt dt
388 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

dICgs 1 dIR dIR d 2 IR 1


Ri  ¼  ICpgs  Rg  g  RS  S  LS  2 S   ICgs
dt Cpgs dt dt dt Cgs

dIRdd 1 d 2 IL d 2 ILdd
Rdd    ICpds þ Ld  2 d ¼ Ldd  ; ICout ¼ IRload ; IRload ðtÞ¼ICout ðtÞ
dt Cpds dt dt2
¼ ICout2 ðt  s4 Þ

1 d 2 IL d 2 ILout1
ILd ðt  s3 Þ þ ILdd ðt  s3 Þ ¼ Cout1  ½  ICpds  Ld  2 d  Lout1  
Cpds dt dt2
d 2 ILout1 1 dICout2 ðt  s4 Þ
ICout2 ðt  s4 Þ ¼ Cout2  ½Lout1    ICout2 ðt  s4 Þ  Rload  
dt2 Cout dt

To find equilibrium points (fixed points) of our system we define

lim ICin ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ICin ðtÞ; lim ILd ðt  s3 Þ ¼ ILd ðtÞ ; lim ILdd ðt  s3 Þ ¼ ILdd ðtÞ
t!1 t!1 t!1
lim ICin2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ICin2 ðtÞ; lim ICout2 ðt  s4 Þ ¼ ICout2 ðtÞ
t!1 t!1

d 2 ILin1 d 2 ½ICin ðt  s1 Þ  ICin2 ðtÞ


2
¼ 0; ¼ 0;
dt dt2
d 2 ILin d 2 ½ICin2 ðt  s2 Þ  ILin ðtÞ dIR
2
¼ 0 ; 2
¼ 0; ds ¼ 0
dt dt dt
dIRd dICgs dIRg dIRS d 2 IR
¼ 0; Ri  ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; 2 S ¼ 0;
dt dt dt dt dt
dIRdd d 2 I Ld d 2 ILdd
¼ 0; 2 ¼ 0; ¼0
dt dt dt2
d 2 I Ld d 2 ILout1 dIC ðt  s4 Þ
2
¼ 0; ¼ 0; out2 ¼0
dt dt2 dt

We get our system fixed points: dXðtÞ


dt ¼ ½C1in1 þ Cin 
1
 IC in ; IC in2 ¼ 0; IC pgs ¼ 0;
IC ds ¼ 0

IC gd ¼ 0; IC pds ¼ 0; IC gd ¼ 0; IC gs ¼ 0; ILd þ ILdd ¼ 0; IC out2 ¼ 0

We consider microwave RF source XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ; jf ðtÞj\1 & A0  jf ðtÞj


df ðtÞ
then XðtÞjA0 jf ðtÞj XðtÞjA0 jf ðtÞj ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ A0 ; dXðtÞ
dt jA0 jf ðtÞj ¼ dt ! e.
Stability analysis:
The standard local stability analysis about any one of the equilibrium points of
the small signal equivalent circuit for FET consists in adding to coordinate
3.6 FET Combined Biasing and Matching Circuit Stability Analysis 389

½ICin ; ILin1 ; ICin2 ; ILin ; ICpgs ,ICds ; IRds ; ICgd ; ICpds ; IRg ; IRd ,ICgs ; IRs ; IRdd ; ILd ; ILdd ; ILout1 ; ICout2 
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs   ekt and retaining
the first order terms in ICin ; ILin1 ; ICin2 ; ILin ; ICpgs ; ICds ; IRds ; ICgd ; . . . The system of ho-
mogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigen-
values. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set the below circuit
variables and circuit variables derivative with respect to time into equivalent circuit
for FET equations. FET circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of
exponential form ½iCin ; iLin1 ; iCin2 ; iLin ; iCpgs ; iCds ; iRds ; iCgd ; . . .  ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed
point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.

ðjÞ ðjÞ
ICin ðtÞ ¼ ICin þ iCin  ekt ; ICin ðt  s1 Þ ¼ ICin þ iCin  ekðts1 Þ ;
ðjÞ dILin1 ðtÞ
ILin1 ðtÞ ¼ ILin1 þ iLin1  ekt ; ¼ iLin1  k  ekt
dt
d 2 ILin1 ðtÞ dIC ðt  s1 Þ
¼ iLin1  k2  ekt ; in ¼ iCin  k  ekðts1 Þ ;
dt2 dt
d 2 ICin ðt  s1 Þ
¼ iCin  k2  ekðts1 Þ
dt2
ðjÞ dIL ðtÞ d 2 ILin ðtÞ
ILin ðtÞ ¼ ILin þ iLin  ekt ; in ¼ iLin  k  ekt ;
dt dt2
kt ðjÞ kt
¼ iLin  k  e ; ICin2 ðtÞ ¼ ICin2 þ iCin2  e
2

d 2 ICin2 ðtÞ ðjÞ


¼ iCin2  k2  ekt ; ICpgs ðtÞ ¼ ICpgs þ iCpgs  ekt ;
dt2
ðjÞ
ICin2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ICin2 þ iCin2  ekðts2 Þ
d 2 ICin2 ðt  s2 Þ ðjÞ
¼ iCin2  k2  ekðts2 Þ ; ICds ¼ ICds þ iCds  ekt ;
dt2
ðjÞ dIR
IRds ¼ IRds þ iRds  ekt ; ds ¼ iRds  k  ekt
dt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ICgd ðtÞ ¼ ICgd þ iCgd  ekt ; ICpds ðtÞ ¼ ICpds þ iCpds  ekt ;
ðjÞ dIRg ðtÞ
IRg ðtÞ ¼ IRg þ iRg  ekt ; ¼ iRg  k  ekt
dt
390 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

ðjÞ dIRd ðtÞ


IRd ðtÞ ¼ IRd þ iRd  ekt ; ¼ iRd  k  ekt ;
dt
ðjÞ dIC ðtÞ
ICgs ðtÞ ¼ ICgs þ iCgs  ekt ; gs ¼ iCgs  k  ekt
dt
ðjÞ kt dIRs ðtÞ
IRs ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs  e ; ¼ iRs  k  ekt ;
dt
d 2 IRs ðtÞ ðjÞ
¼ iRs  k2  ekt ; IRdd ðtÞ ¼ IRdd þ iRdd  ekt
dt2
dIRdd ðtÞ ðjÞ d 2 ILd ðtÞ
¼ iRdd  k  ekt ; ILd ðtÞ ¼ ILd þ iLd  ekt ; ¼ iLd
dt dt2
ðjÞ
 k2  ekt ; ILdd ðtÞ ¼ ILdd þ iLdd  ekt
d 2 ILdd ðtÞ ðjÞ
¼ iLdd  k2  ekt ; ILd ðt  s3 Þ ¼ ILd þ iLd  ekðts3 Þ ;
dt2
ðjÞ
ILdd ðt  s3 Þ ¼ ILdd þ iLdd  ekðts3 Þ
ðjÞ d 2 ILout1 ðtÞ
ILout1 ðtÞ ¼ ILout1 þ iLout1  ekt ; ¼ iLout1  k2  ekt ;
dt2
ðjÞ
ICout2 ðt  s4 Þ ¼ ICout2 þ iCout2  ekðts4 Þ
dICout2 ðt  s4 Þ
¼ iCout2  k2  ekðts4 Þ
dt

By implementing the above delay equations, we get the following system


eigenvalues equations:

dXðtÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ


½ ! e   ðI þ iCin  ekt Þ ¼  ðI þ iCin  ekðts1 Þ Þ þ Lin1  iLin1  k2  ekt ;
dt Cin Cin Cin1 Cin
ðjÞ
ICin2 þ iCin2  ekt ¼ Cin2  ðLin1  ½iCin  eks1  iCin2   k2  ekt  Lin  iLin  k2  ekt Þ
1 ðjÞ
Lin  iLin  k2  ekt   ½I þ iCpgs  ekt  ¼ Lg  ½iCin2  eks2  iLin   k2  ekt
Cpgs Cpgs
ðjÞ
ICds þ iCds  ekt ¼ Cds  Rds  iRds  k  ekt
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
ICgd þ iCgd  ekt ¼ Cgd  f  ½I þ iCpgs  ekt 
Cpgs Cpgs
1 ðjÞ
  ½I þ iCpds  ekt   Rg  iRg  k  ekt  Rd  iRd  k  ekt g
Cpds Cpds
1 ðjÞ
Ri  iCgs  k  ekt ¼  ½I þ iCpgs  ekt   Rg  iRg  k  ekt  RS  iRs  k  ekt
Cpgs Cpgs
1 ðjÞ
 LS  iRs  k2  ekt   ½I þ iCgs  ekt 
Cgs Cgs
1 ðjÞ
 Rdd  iRdd  k  ekt   ½I þ iCpds  ekt  þ Ld  iLd  k2  ekt ¼ Ldd  iLdd  k2  ekt
Cpds Cpds
3.6 FET Combined Biasing and Matching Circuit Stability Analysis 391

ðjÞ ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ


ILd þ iLd  ekðts3 Þ þ ILdd þ iLdd  ekðts3 Þ ¼ Cout1  ½  ðI þ iCpds  ekt Þ
Cpds Cpds
 Ld  iLd  k2  ekt  Lout1  iLout1  k2  ekt 
ðjÞ
ICout2 þ iCout2  ekðts4 Þ ¼ Cout2  ½Lout1  iLout1  k2  ekt
1 ðjÞ
  ðI þ iCout2  ekðts4 Þ Þ  Rload  iCout2  k2  ekðts4 Þ 
Cout Cout2

We implement our system fixed points values:

dXðtÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


! e ) ICin ¼ IC in ¼ 0; ICin2 ¼IC in2 ¼ 0; ICpgs ¼IC pgs ¼ 0; ICds ¼IC ds ¼ 0
dt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ICpgs ¼ IC pgs ; ICgd ¼ IC gd ; IC gd ¼ 0; ICgs ¼IC gs ¼ 0; ICpds ¼IC pds ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ILdd ¼ ILdd ; ILd ¼ ILd ; ILd þ ILdd ¼ 0; ICout2 ¼IC out2 ¼ 0

System set of eigenvalues equations (eliminating ekt term):

1 1
  iCin ¼  iCin  eks1 þ Lin1  iLin1  k2 ; iCin2
Cin Cin1
¼ Cin2  ðLin1  ½iCin  eks1  iCin2   Lin  iLin Þ  k2

1
Lin  iLin  k2   iCpgs ¼ Lg  ½iCin2  eks2  iLin   k2 ; iCds ¼ Cds  Rds  iRds  k
Cpgs

1 1
iCgd ¼  Cgd  iCpgs  Cgd   iCpds  Cgd  ½Rg  iRg þ Rd  iRd   k
Cpgs Cpds

1 1
Ri  iCgs  k ¼  iCpgs  Rg  iRg  k  RS  iRs  k  LS  iRs  k2   iCgs
Cpgs Cgs

1
Rdd  iRdd  k   iCpds þ Ld  iLd  k2 ¼ Ldd  iLdd  k2
Cpds

1
iLd  eks3 þ iLdd  eks3 ¼ Cout1  ½  iCpds  Ld  iLd  k2  Lout1  iLout1  k2 
Cpds

1
iCout2  eks4 ¼ Cout2  ½Lout1  iLout1  k2   iCout2  eks4  Rload  iCout2  k2  eks4 
Cout
392 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

Remark: it a reader task to analyze system stability under delay parameters


variation based on eigenvalues equations.

Exercises

1. We have system of a bipolar transistor that activated at microwave frequency


and include feedback loop (Cfx ; Rfx ; RA ). RA is a variable resistor (3 ports) which
established the strength of our RF circuit feedback. We can divide our variable
resistor RA to two resistive sections: RA  d; RA  ð1  dÞ. Delta parameter (d) is
the feedback balance resistor parameter 0\d\1. Consider the base diagram of
bipolar transistor at microwave frequency circuit (Sect. 3.1) with additional
feedback loop which describe in the below figure.

1:1 Draw the circuit of bipolar transistor with feedback loop at microwave
frequencies equivalent circuit. Input Microwave RF source X(t). We con-
sider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |fX(t)|  1 and A0  |
dfX ðtÞ
fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 ) dXðtÞdt ¼ dt ! e . Find system dif-
ferential equations and fixed points.
1:2 Discuss stability analysis, linearization, and find system Jacobian elements
at fixed points. How Delta (d ; 0\d\1) feedback balance resistor param-
eter influences our system stability?
Exercises 393

1:3 Classify system stability fixed points according to eigenvalues variation.


How Delta (d ; 0\d\1) parameter influences our eigenvalues variation?
1:4 What happened if our feedback loop Delta (d ; 0\d\1) parameter is
constantly equal to one d ¼ 1 ? How our system behaviors change?
1:5 What happened if our feedback loop Delta (d; 0\d\1) parameter is con-
stantly equal to zero d ¼ 0 ? How our system behaviors change?
2. We have system of a bipolar transistor that activated at microwave frequency
and includes two feedback loops, first loop CfA ; RfA ; RA and second loop
CfB ; RfB ; RB . RA and RB are variable resistors (3 ports) which establish the
strength of our RF circuit feedback. We can divide our system circuit feedback
variable resistors to two sections respectively. dA  RA ; ð1  dA Þ  RA and
dB  RB ; ð1  dB Þ  RB . They dA ; dB are two feedback balance resistors parameters
0\dA \1; 0\dB \1; dA 6¼ dB .
Consider the base diagram of bipolar transistor at microwave frequency circuit
(Sect. 3.1) with two additional feedback loops which describe in the below
figure.

2:1 Draw system circuit bipolar transistor with two feedback loops equivalent
circuit at microwave frequencies. Input Microwave RF source X(t). We
consider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |fX(t)|  1 and A0  |
dfX ðtÞ
fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 ) dXðtÞ
dt ¼ dt ! e
Find system differential equations and fixed points.
2:2 Discuss stability analysis, linearization, and find Jacobian elements at fixed
points. How DeltaA (dA ; 0\dA \1) and DeltaB (dB ; 0\dB \1) feedback
balance resistor parameters influence our system stability? dA 6¼ dB
394 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

2:3 Classify system stability fixed points according to eigenvalues. How dA ; dB


parameters influence our system eigenvalues variation?
2:4 What happened if our feedback loop dA parameter is constantly equal to
zero (dA ¼ 0) or one (dA ¼ 1); dB ; 0\dB \1 ? How our system behavior
changes?
2:5 What happened if our feedback loop dB parameter is constantly equal to zero
(dB ¼ 0) or one (dB ¼ 1);dA ; 0\dA \1 ? How our system behavior change?
3. Consider RF FETs amplifier system which includes two RF FETs with
peripheral components. We consider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |
fX(t)| <=1 and A0 > > |fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 .
The FET equivalent circuits are for high frequency model and operation, taking
the node capacitors and other elements into account. If we switch to low fre-
quency small signal FET model, all capacitors in the above model disconnected
and all inductors are short.

3:1. Draw full small signal equivalent circuit for FETs system and write FETs
system differential Eqs.
3:2. Find FETs system fixed points, How our system fixed points change if
R3 = 0? How our system fixed points change if capacitor C1 is
disconnected?
3:3. Discuss RF FETs system standard local stability analysis about anyone of
the equilibrium points. How the stability changes if R3 = 0?
3:4. Classify RF FETs system fixed points and discuss bifurcation for different
values of R1, R2, R3 resistors.
Exercises 395

3:5. Resistor R3 is disconnected, How our RF FETs system dynamical behavior


changes?
3:6. Capacitor C1 is disconnected, How our system bifurcation behavior
changes?
4. We have a schematic of an RF amplifier using a JFET as the active element. The
configuration of the JFET amplifier is common gate. The circuit includes two
iron-core inductors L1, L2 (RF chockes). The iron core inductors block the high
frequency AC signals from getting to the DC power supply. +V is positive DC
voltage source and –V is negative DC voltage source. +V and –V are biasing
voltages to our FET circuit.

We consider RFin signal XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fx ðtÞ; jfx ðtÞj\ ¼ 1 and A0  jfx ðtÞj then
XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fx ðtÞjA0 jfx ðtÞj A0 ; jfx ðtÞj  1.
4:1 Draw full small signal equivalent circuit for FET RF amplifier and write
system differential equations.
4:2 Find JFET amplifier circuit fixed points, How our system fixed points
change if C4 is disconnected?
4:3 Discuss JFET amplifier standard local stability analysis about anyone of the
equilibrium points. How the stability changes if C3 is disconnected?
4:4 Classify JFET amplifier circuit fixed points and discuss bifurcation for
different values of L3, L4.
4:5 L3 is disconnected, How our JFET amplifier circuit behavior changes?
4:6 Capacitor C5 is disconnected, How our system bifurcation behavior
changes?
396 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

5. We have IMPATT amplifier system which is constructed from three ports active
circulator and two IMPATT diodes. The circulator is used to separate input and
output signals. We consider IMPATT diodes chip RF equivalent circuit which
can be represent as a series resistor and capacitor RD1, CD1 and RD2, CD2
respectively for the first IMPATT diode D1 and second IMPATT diode D2.
RD1 < 0, RD2 < 0. RD1 and RD2 are the terminal negative resistances of the
packaged diodes (D1 and D2). IMPATT diodes act as an amplifier in the neg-
ative differential resistance characteristics.

s1 is the time delay for ARB1 microstrip. s2 is the time delay for ARB2
microstrip. s3 is the time delay for ARB3 microstrip. Rload is the circuit load
resistance. V1, V2 are DC voltage sources (bias voltages to IMPATT diodes D1
and D2 respectively). V1 6¼ V2 is different biasing voltages. R1, R2 are parasitic
resistances of DC voltage sources. L1, CA—inductor and capacitor of Bias-T
circuit for D1. L2, CB—inductor and capacitor of Bias-T circuit for D2. ARB1,
ARB2, and ARB3 are circuit microstrip delay lines (s1 ; s2 ; s3 ). D1, D2—first and
second IMPATT diodes.
5:1 Draw system amplifier full equivalent circuit and find differential equations.
Find fixed points and consider amplifier system input voltage
VP1 ¼ C þ nðtÞ, Γ is constant voltage and ξ(t) is RF signal in time.
5:2 Write system differential equations in matrix representation. Discuss system
eigenvalues and related fixed points classification.
5:3 If we short inductor L1 in our amplifier system, How it influences system
stability?
5:4 If we short RA in our amplifier system, How it influences system stability?
Exercises 397

5:5 If we short diode D2, How it influences system differential equations, fixed
points and stability?
5:6 If we disconnect diode D1, How it influences system differential equations,
fixed points and stability?
Hint: The delay parameters s1 ; s2 and s3 are related to currents which flows
through micro strips ARB1, ARB2, and ARB3. We can consider additional delay
parameters D1 ; D2 ; D3 for the current derivatives which flows through micro strips
respectively.
6. We have two sets of multistage IMPATT amplifiers. The output of our system
is a summation of two set’s outputs. The first set of multistage IMPATT
amplifier has additional k1 delay lines s1 ; s3 ; s5 ; . . .; s2n1 for n n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k1
which represents ð2  k1  1Þ IMPATT diode/active circulator circuit stages.
The delay lines for the first set are exist only on odd stages outputs. The second
set of multistage IMPATT amplifiers has additional k2 delay lines
s2 ; s4 ; s6 ; . . .; s2n ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k2 which represents ð2  k2 Þ IMPATT
diode/active circulator circuit stages. The delay lines for the second set are exist
only on even stages outputs (k1 6¼ k2). The first set of multistage IMPATT
amplifiers is feed by microwave RF signal X1(t) and the second set of multi-
stage IMPATT amplifiers is feed by microwave RF signal X2(t); X1(t) 6¼ X2(t).
X1 ðtÞ ¼ C1 þ n1 ðtÞ X2 ðtÞ ¼ C2 þ n2 ðtÞ. Γ1, Γ2 are constant voltages (Γ1 6¼ Γ2)
and ξ1(t), ξ2(t) are RF signals in time ξ1(t) 6¼ ξ2(t).

Each system IMPATT equivalent circuit is constructed from IMPATT diode


and Bias-T circuit which includes DC voltage source (bias voltage to IMPATT
diode), parasitic resistance of DC voltage source, inductor and capacitor. We
neglect the microstrip time delay which is connected between each stage cir-
culator’s port 2 to IMPATT diode. We neglect the voltages on system delay
lines Vs2n1 ! e8n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k1 and Vs2n ! e 8 n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k2 . There is a
delay in the current that flow through each microstrip delay line in the two sets
of multistage IMPATT amplifiers. 1  ð2  n  1Þ  ð2  k1  1Þ for the first set
and 1  2  n  ð2  k2 Þ for the second set. The input current for the circuit stage
398 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

(i) is defined as Iin(i)(t) in the two sets respectively and the output current for
circuit stage (i) is defined as Iout(i)(t) in the two sets respectively. The transfer
function from circuit stage (i) input current Iin(i)(t) to output current Iout(i)(t) is
define as IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ . . .; IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ g1i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ for the first set
and IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼    ;IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ g2i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ for the second set
respectively. g1i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ 6¼ g2i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ
6:1 Find the expression for IRload(t) as a function of the two set’s outputs
functions.
6:2 Find the two functions for the first and second sets: g1i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ;
Ci ; VBi Þ and g2i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ
6:3 Find the expressions for IRload(t) if X1(t) = 0 or X2(t) = 0.
6:4 How our system behavior changes if each IMPATT/active circulator
amplifier stage in the two sets suffers from short Bias-T’s inductor or
shorted Bias-T’s capacitor?
6:5 How our system behavior changes if two set’s input RF signals are as
follow: X1 ðtÞ ¼ C þ nðtÞ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ a1  X1 ðtÞ þ a2  X12 ðtÞ. Γ is a constant
voltage. ξ(t) is a RF signal. a1, a2 are constants.
7. We have system of three sets of multistage IMPATT amplifiers. The RF
microwave signal input to the third set is a summation of two signals: first is the
output signal from the first set and second is the output signal from the second
set. The first set is constructed from multistage IMPATT amplifier which has a
delay line in each output stage. The number of IMPATT/active circulator stages
in the first set is k1 and the number of delay lines is k1 (s1 ; s2 ; . . .; sk1 ). k1 can be
odd or even number. The second set of multistage IMPATT amplifier has
additional k2 delay lines s1 ; s3 ; s5 ; . . .; s2n1 ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k2 which represent
ð2  k2  1Þ IMPATT/ active circulator circuit stages. The delay lines for the
second set are exist only on odd stages outputs. The third set of multistage
IMPATT amplifier has additional k3 delay lines s2 ; s4 ; s6 ; . . .; s2n ; n ¼
1; 2; . . .; k3 which represent 2  k3 IMPATT/active circulator stages. The delay
lines for the third set are exist only on even stages outputs (k1 6¼ k2 6¼ k3 ). The
first set of multistage IMPATT amplifiers is feed by microwave RF signal
X1(t); and the second set of multistage IMPATT amplifier is feed by microwave
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
RF signal X2(t); X1(t) 6¼ X2(t). X1 ðtÞ ¼ C þ nðtÞ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ 1 þ X1 ðtÞ.
Γ is constant voltage and ξ(t) is RF signal in time. Each system IMPATT
equivalent circuit is constructed from IMPATT diode and Bias-T circuit which
includes DC voltage source (bias voltage to IMPATT diode), parasitic resis-
tance of the DC voltage source, inductor and capacitor. We consider IMPATT
diode acts as an amplifier. We neglect the microstrip time delay which is
connected between each stage circulator port 2 to IMPATT diode. We neglect
the voltages on system delay lines Vsn ! e 8 n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k1 ; Vs2n1 ! e 8 n ¼
1; 2; . . .; k2 and Vs2n ! e 8 n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k3 .
Exercises 399

There is a delay in the current that flow through each microstrip delay line in
the three sets of multistage IMPATT amplifier in our system.
8 1  n  k1 first set ; 8 1  n  k2 second set ; 8 1  n  k3 third set
The input current for circuit stage (i) is defined as Iin(i)(t) in all sets and the
output current for circuit stage (i) is defined as Iout(t) in all sets. The transfer
function from circuit stage (i) input current Iin(i)(t) to output current Iout(i)(t) in
set m (m = 1,2,3 stand for set number). IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ gmi ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ,Di ;
Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ 8 m ¼ 1; 2; 3 (set number).

gl1 i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; . . .Þ 6¼ gl2 i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; . . .Þ ; l1 6¼ l2 ; l1 ¼ 1; 2; 3 ; l2 ¼ 1; 2; 3

7:1 Find the expression for IRload(t) as a function of the three set’s output
functions.
7:2 Find the three functions (m = 1,2,3), gmi ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ.
7:3 Find the expression for IRload(t) if X1(t) = 0.
7:4 Find the expression for IRload(t) if X2(t) = 0.
7:5 How our system behavior changes if each IMPATT diode/active circulator
amplifier stage in the second set is suffered from short Bias-T’s inductor or
short Bias-T’s capacitor?
7:6 How our system behavior changes if each IMPATT diode/active circulator
amplifier stage in the third set is suffered from short Bias-T’s inductor or
short Bias-T’s capacitor?
400 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

8. We have system of two sets of multistage IMPATT amplifiers which are


connected through isolators to loads network (RA, RB, and R − Q). The RF
microwave signal input to the first set is X1(t) and for the second set is X2(t).
The first set of multistage IMPATT amplifier has additional k1 delay lines
s1 ; s3 ; s5 ; . . .; s2n1 for n n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k1 which represents ð2  k1  1Þ
IMPATT diode/active circulator circuit stages. The delay lines for the first set
are exist only on odd stages outputs. The second set of multistage IMPATT
amplifiers has additional k2 delay lines s2 ; s4 ; s6 ; . . .; s2n ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k2
which represents ð2  k2 Þ IMPATT diode/active circulator circuit stages. The
delay lines for the second set are exist only on even stages outputs (k1 6¼ k2).
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X1(t) 6¼ X2(t). X1 ðtÞ ¼ C1 þ n21 ðtÞ ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ n2 ðtÞ  C2 þ X1 ðtÞ. Γ1, Γ2 are
constant voltages (Γ1 6¼ Γ2) and ξ1(t), ξ2(t) are RF signals in time ξ1(t) 6¼ ξ2(t).
Consider that isolators A and B are ideal and transparent to RF signal in one
direction.

Each system IMPATT equivalent circuit is constructed from IMPATT diode


and Bias-T circuit which includes DC voltage source (bias voltage to IMPATT
diode), parasitic resistance of DC voltage source, inductor and capacitor. We
neglect the microstrip time delay which is connected between each stage cir-
culator’s port 2 to IMPATT diode. We neglect the voltages on system delay
lines Vs2n1 ! e8 n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k1 and Vs2n ! e 8 n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k2 . There is a
delay in the current that flow through each microstrip delay line in the two sets
of multistage IMPATT amplifiers. 1  ð2  n  1Þ  ð2  k1  1Þ for the first set
and 1  2  n  ð2  k2 Þ for the second set. The input current for the circuit stage
(i) is defined as Iin(i)(t) in the two sets respectively and the output current for
circuit stage (i) is defined as Iout(i)(t) in the two sets respectively. The transfer
function from circuit stage (i) input current Iin(i)(t) to output current Iout(i)(t) is
define as IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ . . . ; IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ g1i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ for the first set
and IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ . . . ; IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ g2i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ for the second set
respectively. g1i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ 6¼ g2i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ
Exercises 401

8:1 Find the expression for IRA(t), IRB(t), IR-Q(t), as a function of the two set’s
outputs functions.
8:2 Find the two functions for the first and second sets: g1i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ;
Ci ; VBi Þ and g2i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ
8:3 Find the expressions for IR-Q(t)if X1(t) = 0 or X2(t) = 0.
8:4 How our system behavior changes if each IMPATT/active circulator
amplifier stage in the two sets suffers from short Bias-T’s inductor or
shorted Bias-T’s capacitor and additionally RA is disconnected?
8:5 How our system behavior changes if two set’s input RF signals are as
follow: X1 ðtÞ ¼ C þ nðtÞ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ a1  X1 ðtÞ þ a2  X12 ðtÞ. Γ is a constant
voltage. ξ(t) is a RF signal. a1, a2 are constants and RB is disconnected?
9. We have a system of two sets of multistage IMPATT amplifier which feed load
resistance RL. Each circulator/IMPATT diode amplifier stage gets RF signal
from the previous amplifier unit and after amplification feeds the RF signal to
the next amplifier unit. Input RF microwave signal to the first set is defined as
X1(t) and to the second set X2(t). The function expression which characterize
our load resistance current in time is as follow:

X
n
IRL ¼ fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ð. . .ðf1 ðIinð1Þ ðt  sk Þ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ. . .Þ; Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ;
k¼3
Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ þ g2 ðg1 ðIinð1Þ ðt  s1  s2 Þ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ; D2 ; L2 ; C2 ; VB2 Þ

The first set is characterized by the f functions and the second set is charac-
terized by the g function.
First set: sk ¼ jsk1  ð1Þk þ sk2  ð1Þk þ 1 j 8 n
k
3 is recursive function
of micro strip delay line parameter in the first set.

s3 ¼ js1  s2 j ; s4 ¼ js3  s2 j ; s5 ¼ js3  s4 j ; s6 ¼ js5  s4 j. . .

Second set:
0
s1 [ 0; s2 [ 0; Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutð2Þ ðt  s2 Þ; Iinð1Þ ðtÞ ¼ n2 ðX2 ðtÞÞ
Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ g2 ðIoutð1Þ ðt  s1 Þ; D2 ; L2 ; C2 ; VB2 Þ; Iinð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutð1Þ ðt  s1 Þ
0
Ioutð1Þ ðtÞ ¼ g1 ðIinð1Þ ðtÞ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ; Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ g2 ðIoutð1Þ ðt  s1  s2 Þ; D2 ; L2 ; C2 ; VB2 Þ
0
Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ g2 ðg1 ðIinð1Þ ðt  s1  s2 Þ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ; D2 ; L2 ; C2 ; VB2 Þ:

0
The system’s summation operator inputs are Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ and fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ð. . .Þ

9:1 Draw our two sets amplifier system.


9:2 How our system dynamic change for sk1 [ sk2 and for sk1 \sk2 ?
(First set micro strip delay lines parameters, n ≥ k ≥ 3).
402 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis

9:3 The system’s first set of IMPATT multistage amplifiers has micro strip
delay lines only on odd places of IMPATT diode/active circulator stages.
Write the related functions for IRL(t) and draw our system. How the
dynamic of the system changes?
9:4 System’s first set stages is suffered from Bias-T’s short capacitor.
How our system functionality changes? Find the related f functions for that
case.
9:5 We change the direction polarity of each IMPATT diode in the first set.
How it influences our system functionality. Find the expression for IRL(t)
and transformation function in each multistage amplifier in the first set.
9:6 The recursive function of micro strip delay lines in the first set is as follow:

sk ¼ jsk1  ð1Þk þ jsk2  ð1Þk þ 1  sk3  ð1Þk jj 8 n


k
4; s3
0
g1 ðs; kÞ ¼ sk2  ð1Þk þ 1  sk3  ð1Þk ;
g2 ðs; kÞ ¼ sk1  ð1Þk ; sk ¼ jg2 ðs; kÞ þ jg1 ðs; kÞjj

How our system dynamic changes? Write all possible options for
s3 ; s4 ; s5 ; s6 ; . . .; sn . Analyze the IRL(t) expression for that case.
10. We have a system of RF FET transistor combined biasing and matching circuit.
The RF FET transistor is N channel JFET and the input and output matching
circuits are Pi type. We represent our circuit microstrip elements as a delay lines τ1,
…,τ6 (τk+1 = τk + Γ  τk−1) for C 2 ½1; . . .; 10 ; k ¼ 2; . . .; 5 and τ1 = τ, τ2 = τ2.
We neglect the voltages on the delay lines Vsi ! e ; s1 ; . . .; s6 ; 1  i  6. There
is a delay in the current which flows through each microstrip delay line
IðtÞ ! Iðt  si Þ 8 1  i  6. We use for our analysis the FET small signal
equivalent circuit (reduced version). The RF choke Ldd presents the microwave
signal from being shorted out by the drain resistor Rdd through RF choke Ldd,
which is connected to the positive supply voltage Vdd. Input and output capac-
itors are Cin and Cout. X(t) is a input microwave RF source.
Exercises 403

10:1 Draw our system complete circuit which includes small signal equivalent
circuit for FET.
10:2 Write system represented differential equations with delay variables in
time (τ1,…,τ6 delay parameters).
10:3 Find our system small increments Jacobian and characteristic Eq.
10:4 Discuss stability switching under delay parameter (τ) variation and Γ
parameter variation.
10:5 How our system dynamic changes if sk þ 1 ¼ sk  C þ Csk  sk1 sk þ 1 ¼
sk  C þ Csk  sk1 8 C 2 ½1; . . .; 10 ; k ¼ 2; . . .; 5. Discuss stability
Switching under delay parameter (τ) variation and Γ parameter variation.
10:6 Resistor Rs is disconnected. How our system dynamic changes? Discuss
stability switching under delay parameter (τ) variation and Γ parameter
variation.
Chapter 4
Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching
Network Stability Analysis

An amplifier is an active device that has the ability to amplify voltage, amplify
current or amplify both voltage and current. There are some types of amplifiers.
Amplifiers types: zero frequency amplifiers (DC amplifiers), low frequency
amplifiers (audio amplifiers), and high frequency amplifiers (RF amplifiers).
Power is P = VI, when current (I) or voltage (V) is raising then will create power
amplification. Amplifiers come in three basic flavors: Common Base (CB)
amplifiers, Common Collector (CC) amplifiers, and Common Emitters (CE)
amplifiers. It depends whether the base, collector, or emitter is common to both
the input and output of the amplifier. Common Base (CB) amplifier, input signal
inserted at emitter (E) and output signal taken from the collector (C). The CB
amplifier can operate as a voltage amplifier for low input impedance circuits. The
most popular amplifier circuit is Common Emitter (CE). The CE amplifier has a
greater current gain and voltage gain combination than any other type. CE
amplifier makes excellent power amplifiers. Common Emitter (CE) amplifier,
input signal inserted at the base (B) and output signal taken from the collector
(C). The CE amplifier’s output voltage is shifted by *180° in phase compared to
CE amplifier’s input signal. At RF frequencies there is an effect of “positive
feedback”, which creates amplifier instability and oscillation. “Positive feed-
back” is when there is internal feedback capacitance between the transistor’s
collector and its base. It cause to undesired CE oscillations. At a specific fre-
quency this capacitance will send an in phase signal back into the base input from
the collector’s output. This back in phase signal creates an “oscillator”. The
Common Collector (CC) amplifier is emitter follower amplifier. The CC
amplifier has the input signal inserted into the base and output signal from the
emitter. The CC amplifier has current and power gain, voltage gain less than one.
CC amplifier’s common use buffer or active impedance matching circuit. The CC

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 405


O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_4
406 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

amplifier has high input impedance and low output impedance. There is no phase
inversion between CC amplifier’s input and output. When an amplifier’s output
impedance matches the load impedance maximum power is transferred to the
load and all reflections are eliminated. When an amplifier’s output impedance
unmatched the load impedance there are reflections and less than maximum
power is transferred to the load. There are instabilities behaviors in these three
types of amplifiers causes by circuit micro-strip delays in time parasitic effects.
We use RF matching network which able and facilitate impedance matching and
filtering of signal, coupling between RF stages. There are typical amplifiers
matching networks: L matching network, T matching network, and PI matching
network. In design of microwave matching network, device parasitic effects of
length on RF circuit matching and stability. Many RF circuits contain Bias-T
three ports network. The function of the Bias-T is to simultaneously allow a DC
bias voltage and RF test signal to be applied to the port of a transistor during
measurement and operation. Bias-T three ports network suffers from instability
under delayed micro-strip in time. The passive filter with Bias-T suffers from
instability under parameters variation. Many RF circuits include a PIN diode.
A PIN diode is a diode with a wide, lightly doped ‘near’ intrinsic semiconductor
region between a p-type semiconductor and a n-type semiconductor region.
A PIN diode suitable for many applications: Attenuators, fast switches, photo
detectors, and high voltage power electronics applications. A PIN diode operates
under high level injection. The PIN diode suffers from instability under param-
eters variations.

4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network

Amplifier can be categorized in two manner, first according to signal level (small
signal amplifier, power/large signal amplifier) and second according to DC biasing
scheme of the active component (Classes A, B, AB, C). There are also other classes,
such as class D (D stands for digital), class E and class F. These all uses the
transistor/FET as a switch [24–26]. Input and output voltage relation of the
P3
amplifier can be modeled simply as: Vout ðtÞ ¼ ak  vkin þ H:O:T; Vout ðtÞ ¼
k¼1
a1  vi ðtÞ þ a2  v2i ðtÞ þ a3  v3i ðtÞ þ H:O:T. The general block diagram is described
below (Fig. 4.1):
If we compare small signal versus Large-signal operation amplifier output
voltage expression: Large signal Vout ðtÞ ¼ a1  vi ðtÞ þ a2  v2i ðtÞ þ a3  v3i ðtÞ þ
P3
H:O:T;Vout ðtÞ ¼ ak  vkin þ H:O:T. We get usually non-sinusoidal waveform
k¼1
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 407

Fig. 4.1 Small Signal (SS) amplifier and matching network

amplifier output signal. Small signal, output voltage expression is linear Vout ðtÞ ’
a1  vi ðtÞ and the output signal is sinusoidal waveform. All amplifiers are inherently
nonlinear. However when the input signal is small, the input and output relationship
of the amplifier is approximately linear.
Vout ðtÞ ¼ a1  vi ðtÞ þ a2  v2i ðtÞ þ a3  v3i ðtÞ þ H:O:T  a1  vi ðtÞ. When vi ðtÞ ! e
ð\2:6 mVÞ Then Vout ðtÞ  a1  vi ðtÞ (Fig. 4.2).
The active component can be BJT transistor (Fig. 4.3):
The linear relationship applies also to current and power. An amplifier that
fulfills these conditions: Small signal operation and linearity is called Small Signal
Amplifier (SSA). If a SSA amplifier contains BJT and FET, these components can

Fig. 4.2 Small Signal (SS) amplifier and Zs, Zload


408 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Fig. 4.3 Small Signal (SS) amplifier BJT transistor active component

be replaced by their respective small signal model, for instance the Hybrid Pi model
of BJT. To determine the performance of an amplifier, the following characteristics
are typically observed: power gain, bandwidth (operation frequency range), noise
figure, phase response, gain compression, dynamic range, harmonic distortion,
intermodulation distortion and Third Order Intercept point (TOI). The character-
istics which are important to small signal amplifier are bandwidth, noise figure, and
phase response. The important parameters of Large-signal amplifier (Related to
linearity) are gain compression, dynamic range, harmonic distortion, intermodula-
tion distortion, and Third Order Intercept point (TOI).
Typical RF amplifier schematics (Fig. 4.4):
Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions, the BJT can be replaced with linear
Hybrid Pi model (Fig. 4.5).
At low frequencies it is assumed that the transistor responds instantly to charges
of input voltage or current but actually because the mechanism of the transport of
charge carriers from emitter to collector is one of diffusion. The transistor behavior at
high frequencies is inspected by examine this diffusion mechanism in more details.
The Hybrid Pi model gives a reasonable compromise between accuracy and sim-
plicity. Using this model, a detailed analysis of a single stage CE transistor amplifier
is made. The Common Emitter (CE) is the most important practical configuration.
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 409

Fig. 4.4 Typical RF amplifier schematics

Fig. 4.5 AC Small Signal (SS) amplifier Hybrid Pi model

The CE model is valid at high frequencies. The circuit called the Hybrid Pi,
Giacoletto or model. The analyses of circuits using this model are not too difficult
and give results which are excellent with experiment at all frequencies for which the
410 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

transistor gives reasonable amplification. All parameters (resistances and capaci-


tances, inductances) in the model are assumed to be independent of frequency. They
may vary with the quiescent operation point, but under given bias conditions are
reasonably constant for small signal swings [92,93].
Remark: like a PN diode, we can break the BJT up into a large signal analysis
and small signal analysis and “linearize” the non-linear behavior of the Ebers-Moll
model. Small signal models are only useful for forward active mode and thus, are
derived under this condition. Saturation and cutoff are used for switches which
involve very large voltage/current swings from the on to off states. Small signal
models are used to determine amplifier characteristics. When a diode voltage
exceeds a certain value, the non-linear behavior of the diode leads to distortion of
the current/voltage curves, and if the BJT transistor inputs/outputs exceed certain
limits, the full Ebers-Moll model must be used.
For amplifiers functioning at RF and microwave frequencies, usually of interest
is the input and output power relation. The ratio of output power over input power
is called power gain (G), usually expressed in dB. Power gain:
output power
G ¼ 10  log 10 ð input power Þ dB. There are a number of definitions for power
gain. Furthermore G is a function of frequency and the input signal level. Power
gain is preferred for high frequency amplifiers as the impedance encountered is
usually low (due to presence of parasitic capacitance).
Power = Voltage  Current. If the amplifier is required to drive 50 Ohm load
the voltage across the load may be small, although the corresponding current may
be large (there is a current gain). For amplifiers functioning at lower frequency
(such as IF frequency), it is the voltage gain that is of interest, since impedance
encounter is usually higher (less parasitic). If the output of an IF amplifier drives the
modulator circuits, which are usually digital systems, the impedance looking into
the digital system is high and large voltage can be developed across it. Thus
working with voltage gain is more convenient. When the input driving signal is
small, the amplifier is linear and harmonic components are almost non-existent.
When the input driving signal is too large the amplifier becomes nonlinear.
Harmonics are introduced at the output. Harmonic generation reduces the gain of
the amplifier, as some of the output power at the fundamental frequency is shifted to
higher harmonics. This result is in gain compression. The amplifier also introduces
noise into the output in addition to the noise from the environment.
Phase consideration is important for amplifier working with wideband signals.
For signal to be amplified with no distortion, two requirements are needed from
linear systems theory. First the magnitude of the power gain transfer function must
be a constant with respect to frequency (f). Second the phase of the power gain
transfer function must be a linear function of (f). A linear phase produces a constant
time delay for all signal frequencies, and a linear phase shift produces different time
delay for different frequencies. Property means that all frequency components will
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 411

be amplified by similar amount and implies that all frequency components will be
delayed by similar amount. Essence of Small Signal Amplifier (SSA) design: In
essence, designing a small signal amplifier with transistor or Monolithic Microwave
Integrated Circuit (MMIC) implies finding the suitable load and source impedance
to be connected to the output and input port, and getting the required transducer
power gain GT, bandwidth and other characteristics. An amplifier is a circuit
designed to enlarged electrical signals. When there is no input, there should be no
output; this condition is known as stable. On the contrary, if the amplifier produces
an output when there is no input, it is unstable. In fact the amplifier becomes an
oscillator. Thus a stability analysis is required to determine whether an amplifier
circuit is stable or not. Stability analysis is also carried out by assuming a
small-signal amplifier, since the initial signal that causes oscillation is always very
small. Stability of an amplifier is affected by the load and source impedance con-
nected to its two ports. An unstable or marginally stable amplifier can be made
more stable. When amplifier is unstable, or stable region is too small there are some
steps which need to be done: use negative feedback to reduce amplifier gain,
redesign DC biasing, finding new operating point (or Q point) that will result in
more stable amplifier, add some resistive loss to the circuit to improve stability, and
use a new component with better stability.
When an amplifier’s output impedance matches the load impedance, maximum
power is transferred to the load. When amplifier’s output impedance matches the
load impedance all reflections are eliminated. When an amplifier’s output impe-
dance unmatched the load impedance there are reflections and less than maximum
power is transferred to the load. In order to develop maximum power the Zout of the
amplifier must be complex conjugate of the Zin of the load. Amplifier matching
allows to amplifier maximum power transfer and attenuation of harmonics to be
achieved between stages. RF matching network able to facilitates impedance
matching, filtering of signal and coupling between RF stages. The amplifier
matching networks types are L matching network, T matching network, and PI
matching network.
L matchingnetwork: LC matching topology is especially for narrowband impe-
dance matching. L network name is due to its L shape. L network can furnish low
pass filtering to decrease harmonic output. Two stages (amplifier, load) are con-
structed with simple low pass L network between stages. Low pass L network can
matches a higher output impedance source (Zhigh) to a lower input impedance load
(Zlow). Low pass L network can matches a lower output impedance source (Zlow) to
a higher input impedance load (Zhigh). We need to analyze the stability of typical
RF amplifier under RF and small signal conditions, the BJT can be replaced with
linear Hybrid Pi model and additional input and output matching circuits. We define
Xs(t) as the RF source and Rs RF source parasitic resistance (Fig. 4.6).
412 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Fig. 4.6 Amplifier Hybrid Pi model and additional input and output matching circuits

Xs ðtÞ  VA1 dVA1 dIL d


IRs ¼ ; I C 1 ¼ C1  ; VA1  VA2 ¼ L1  1 ; ICC1 ¼ CC1  ðVA2  VA3 Þ
Rs dt dt dt
dIL3 VA4 dIL
IL1 ¼ ICC1 ; VA3  VA4 ¼ L3  ; IRb2 ¼ ; IL3 ¼ IRb2 ; VA3  VA13 ¼ L2  2 ;
dt Rb2 dt
VA13  VA9 dILbplg VA5  VA6
IRb1 ¼ VA3  VA5 ¼ Lbplg  ; IRbbp ¼ ; ILbplg ¼ IRbbp ;
Rb1 dt Rbbp
VA
IRc ¼ 9 ; Vpi ¼ VA6  VA8 ¼ VCe
Rc
dVpi VA  VA8 dðVA6  VA7 Þ VA  VA7
ICe ¼ Ce  ; IRbpe ¼ 6 ; I C c ¼ Cc  ; IRbpc ¼ 6 ;
dt Rbpe dt Rbpc
VA  VA8
IRce ¼ 7
Rce
dILeplg dIL dLLc
VA8 ¼ Leplg  ; VA7  VA10 ¼ Lcplg  cplg ; VA9  VA10 ¼ Lc  ;
dt dt dt
dðVA10  VA11 Þ
ICc2 ¼ Cc2 
dt

dVA11 dIL
I C2 ¼ C 2  ; VA11  VA12 ¼ L4  4 ; VA12 ¼ Vout ; IL4 ¼ IRload ;
dt dt
Vout VA12
IRload ¼ ¼
Rload Rload
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 413

Table 4.1 Amplifier Hybrid Pi model and matching circuit Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) for all
nodes
Node KCL @ Ai Node KCL @ Ai
number number
A1 IRs ¼ IL1 þ IC1 A8 ICe þ IRbpe þ gm  Vpi þ IRce ¼ ILeplg
A2 IL1 ¼ ICc1 A9 IRb1 ¼ IRc þ ILc
A3 ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILbplg þ IL3 A10 ILc þ ILcplg ¼ ICc2
A4 IL3 ¼ IRb2 A11 ICc2 ¼ IL4 þ IC2
A5 ILbplg ¼ IRbbp A12 IL4 ¼ IRload
A6 IRbbp ¼ IRbpc þ ICc þ IRbpe þ ICe A13 IL2 ¼ IRb1
A7 ICc þ IRbpc ¼ gm  Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg

We can write our circuit Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) for all nodes (Table 4.1):

Xs ðtÞ  VA1
IRs ¼ ) IRs  Rs ¼ Xs ðtÞ  VA1 ) VA1 ¼ Xs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs
Rs
 
dVA1 dXs ðtÞ dIRs dIL
I C1 ¼ C1  ¼ C1    Rs ; VA1  VA2 ¼ L1  1 ) VA2
dt dt dt dt
dIL1
¼ VA1  L1 
dt
 
dIL1 dVA2 dVA3
VA2 ¼ Xs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  L1  ; ICC1 ¼ CC1  
 dt dt dt
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dVA3
¼ CC1    Rs  L1  2 
dt dt dt dt

VA4 dIL
IRb2 ¼ ) VA4 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 ; VA3  VA4 ¼ L3  3 ) VA3
Rb2 dt
dIL3 dVA3 dIRb2 d 2 IL
¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  ; ¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3
dt dt dt dt
 
dXs ðtÞ d 2 IL 1 dIRb2 d 2 IL 3
System equation No. 1: ICC1 ¼ CC1  dt  dIdtRs  Rs  L1  dt2  dt  Rb2  L3  dt2

dIL2 dIL dIL dIL


VA3  VA13 ¼ L2  ) VA13 ¼ VA3  L2  2 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  L2  2
dt dt dt dt

VA13  VA9
IRb1 ¼ ) IRb1  Rb1 ¼ VA13  VA9 ) VA9 ¼ VA13  IRb1  Rb1
Rb1

dIL3 dIL
VA9 ¼ VA13  IRb1  Rb1 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   L2  2  IRb1  Rb1
dt dt
414 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

dILbplg dIL dIL


VA3  VA5 ¼ Lbplg  ) VA5 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg
dt dt dt
VA5  VA6
IRbbp ¼ ) IRbbp  Rbbp ¼ VA5  VA6 ) VA6
Rbbp
dIL dIL
¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp
dt dt
VA9 VA  VA8
IR c ¼ ) VA9 ¼ IRc  Rc ; IRbpe ¼ 6 ) IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ VA6  VA8 ) VA8 ¼ VA6  IRbpe  Rbpe
Rc Rbpe
dIL dIL
VA8 ¼ VA6  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe
dt dt

dðVA6  VA7 Þ VA  VA7


I Cc ¼ C c  ; IRbpc ¼ 6 ) I Cc
dt Rbpc
dIR
¼ Cc  Rbpc  bpc ; VA7  VA8 ¼IRce  Rce
dt
dIL3 dIL
VA7 ¼VA8 þ IRce  Rce ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe
dt dt
 Rbpe þ IRce  Rce

System equation No. 2:

dILeplg dIL dIL


VA8 ¼ Leplg  ) IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe
dt dt dt
dILeplg
¼ Leplg 
dt

dILcplg dIL
VA7  VA10 ¼ Lcplg  ) VA10 ¼ VA7  Lcplg  cplg
dt dt
dIL dIL
VA10 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe þ IRce  Rce
dt dt
dILcplg
 Lcplg 
dt
dLLc dLLc dVA10 ICc2 IC
VA9  VA10 ¼ Lc  ) VA9 ¼ VA10 þ Lc  ; ¼ þ 2
dt dt dt Cc2 C2

dIL dIL
VA9 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe þ IRce  Rce
dt dt
dIL dLLc
 Lcplg  cplg þ Lc 
dt dt
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 415

 
dðVA10  VA11 Þ dVA10 dVA11
ICc2 ¼ Cc2  ) ICc2 ¼ Cc2   ) ICc2
 dt  dt dt
dVA10 IC2
¼ Cc2  
dt C2

System equation No. 3:



ICc2 I C2 d dIL dIL
þ ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp
Cc2 C2 dt dt dt

dIL
IRbpe  Rbpe þ IRce  Rce  Lcplg  cplg
dt
ICc2 IC dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg dIRbbp dIR
þ 2¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg  2
  Rbbp  bpe
Cc2 C2 dt dt dt dt dt
dIRce d 2 ILcplg
 Rbpe þ  Rce  Lcplg 
dt dt2
dIL4 dIL VA
VA11  VA12 ¼ L4  ) VA11 ¼ VA12 þ L4  4 ; IRload ¼ 12 ) VA12
dt dt Rload
¼ IRload  Rload

System equation No. 4:


 
dIL4 dIRload d 2 IL
VA11 ¼ IRload  Rload þ L4  ; IC2 ¼ C2   Rload þ L4  2 4
dt dt dt

We can summery our system equations:


 
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIR d 2 IL
ICC1 ¼ CC1    Rs  L1  2 1  b2  Rb2  L3  2 3
dt dt dt dt dt

dIL3 dIL dIL


IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ Leplg  eplg
dt dt dt

ICc2 IC dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg dIRbbp dIR


þ 2¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg    Rbbp  bpe  Rbpe
Cc2 C2 dt dt dt2 dt dt
2  
dIRce d ILcplg dIRload d 2 I L4
þ  Rce  Lcplg  I C2 ¼ C 2   Rload þ L4  2
dt dt2 dt dt

Since ICc2 ¼ IL4 þ IC2 ¼ IRload þ IC2 ) IC2 ¼ ICc2  IRload then
416 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

 
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dIRb2 d 2 I L3
ICC1 ¼ CC1    Rs  L1  2   Rb2  L3  2
dt dt dt dt dt

dIL3 dIL dIL


IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ Leplg  eplg
dt dt dt

ICc2 IC dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg dIRbbp dIR


þ 2¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg    Rbbp  bpe
Cc2 C2 dt dt dt2 dt dt
dIRce d 2 ILcplg
 Rbpe þ  Rce  Lcplg 
dt dt2
 
dI d2 I
ICc2  IRload ¼ C2  Rdtload  Rload þ L4  dt2L4 . We can restrict our two differential
equations to one differential equation:
 
d dIL dIL d 2 ILeplg
IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ Leplg 
dt dt dt dt2
dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg dIRbbp dIR d 2 ILeplg
 Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg  2
  Rbbp  bpe  Rbpe ¼ Leplg 
dt dt dt dt dt dt2

ICc2 IC dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg dIRbbp dIR


þ 2¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg    Rbbp  bpe
Cc2 C2 dt dt dt2 dt dt
dIRce d 2 ILcplg
 Rbpe þ  Rce  Lcplg 
dt dt2
I I d 2 ILcplg d 2 ILeplg
One differential equation: CCc2c2 þ CC22  dIdtRce  Rce þ Lcplg  dt2 ¼ Leplg  dt2
We get system three differential equations:

IL3 ¼ IRb2 ; IL1 ¼ ICc1 ; ICc2 ¼ IL4 þ IC2 ) IC2 ¼ ICc2  IRload
 
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIR d 2 IL
IL1 ¼ CC1    Rs  L1  2 1  b2  Rb2  L3  2 3
dt dt dt dt dt

ICc2 IC dIR d 2 ILcplg d 2 ILeplg


þ 2  ce  Rce þ Lcplg  ¼ Leplg 
Cc2 C2 dt dt2 dt2
 
dIRload d 2 IRload
ICc2  IRload ¼ C2   Rload þ L4 
dt dt2

We need to find our system equilibrium points (fixed points). It is done by setting
dIRs dIRb2 dIL1 d 2 IL1 dIL3 d 2 IL3
dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0) dt2 ¼ 0; dt ¼0) dt2 ¼ 0; dIdtRce ¼ 0
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 417

dILcplg d 2 ILcplg dILeplg d 2 ILeplg dIRload d 2 IRload


¼0) ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) ¼0
dt dt2 dt dt2 dt dt2

We get the following system fixed points:

dXs ðtÞ  1 1 IR


IL1 ¼ CC1  ; ICc2  ð þ Þ  load ¼ 0; IC c2  IRload ¼ 0
dt Cc2 C2 C2

dXs ðtÞ dXs ðtÞ


IC c2  IRload ¼ 0 ) IC 2 ¼ 0; IL1 ¼ CC1  ) IC c1 ¼ CC1 
dt dt
dXs ðtÞ dXs ðtÞ dXs ðtÞ
IL1 ¼ CC1  ) CC1  ¼ IRs  IC 1 ; CC1  ¼ IL2 þ ILbplg þ IL3
dt dt dt

We consider input RF source Xs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; jnðtÞj\1&A0 jnðtÞjThen


dXs ðtÞj
Xs ðtÞjA0 jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ  A0 ; A0 jnðtÞj
dt ¼ dnðtÞ
dt ! e.
Based on the above assumption, we get the following system fixed points:
 
1 1 IRload
IL1 ¼ 0; IC c2  þ  ¼ 0; IC c2  IRload ¼ 0; IRs  IC 1 ) IRs ¼ IC 1
Cc2 C2 C2

IC c2  IRload ¼ 0 ) IC 2 ¼ 0; IL1 ¼ 0 ) IC c1 ¼ 0; IL1 ¼ 0 ) IC 1


¼ IRs ; IL2 þ ILbplg þ IL3 ¼ 0

E ðIL1 ; IC c2 ; IRload ; IRce ; IC 2 ; IC 1 ; IRs ; IL2 ; ILbplg ; IL3 Þ
¼ ð0; IRload ; IRload ; IRce ; 0; IRs ; IRs ; ðILbplg þ IL3 Þ; ILbplg ; IL3 Þ

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the equi-
librium points of the Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network consists in
adding to coordinate [IL1 ; ICc2 ; IRload ; IRce ; IC2 ; IC1 ; IRs ; IL2 ; ILbplg ; IL3 ] arbitrarily small
increments of exponentially form ½iL1 ; iCc2 ; iRload ; iRce ; iC2 ; iC1 ; iRs ; iL2 ; iLbplg ; iL3   ekt
and retaining the first order terms in
IL1 ; ICc2 ; IRload ; IRce ; IC2 ; IC1 ; IRs ; IL2 ; ILbplg ; IL3 . The system of homogenous equations
leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The polynomial
characteristic equations accept by set of the below circuit variables, circuit variables
derivative and circuit variables second order derivative with respect to time into
Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network equivalent circuit [2–4]. Our
Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network equivalent circuit fixed values
with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½iL1 ; iCc2 ; iRload ; iRce ; iC2 ; iC1 ;
iRs ; iL2 ; iLbplg ; iL3   ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2
(third fixed point), etc.,
dIL1 d 2 IL1 dIL3 d 2 IL3
We define new variables: Y1 ¼ dt ) dYdt1 ¼ dt2 ; Y2 ¼ dt ) dYdt2 ¼ dt2
418 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

 
dIRload dY3 d 2 IRload dY3
Y3 ¼ ) ¼ ; ICc2  IRload ¼ C2  Y3  Rload þ L4 
dt dt dt2 dt
 
dXs ðtÞ dIRs dY1 dIRb2 dY2
I L 1 ¼ C C1  !e   Rs  L1    Rb2  L3 
dt dt dt dt dt

1 1 IR dIR d 2 ILcplg d 2 ILeplg


ICc2  ð þ Þ  load  ce  Rce þ Lcplg  ¼ L eplg 
Cc2 C2 C2 dt dt2 dt2
2 2
dIL dY4 d ILcplg dIL dY5 d ILeplg
Y4 ¼ cplg ) ¼ 2
; Y5 ¼ eplg ) ¼
dt dt dt dt dt dt2
1 1 IR dIR dY4 dY5
ICc2  ð þ Þ  load  ce  Rce þ Lcplg  ¼ Leplg 
Cc2 C2 C2 dt dt dt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ; IL1 ðtÞ
ðjÞ
¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt

ðjÞ ðjÞ dY4 ðtÞ dY5 ðtÞ


Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt ; Y5 ðtÞ ¼ Y5 þ y5  ekt ; ¼ y4  k  ekt ; ¼ y5  k  ekt
dt dt
ðjÞ ðjÞ dIL ðtÞ dIL ðtÞ
IL3 ðtÞ ¼ IL3 þ iL3  ekt ; IRload ðtÞ ¼ IRload þ iRload  ekt ; 1 ¼ iL1  k  ekt ; 3 ¼ iL3  k  ekt
dt dt

dIRload ðtÞ dIL ðjÞ


¼ iRload  k  ekt ; Y1 ¼ 1 ) Y1 þ y1  ekt ¼ iL1  k  ekt ; ICc2 ðtÞ
dt dt
ðjÞ
¼ ICc2 þ iCc2  ekt

dIL1 ðjÞ dIL3 ðjÞ dIRload ðjÞ


At fixed point dt ¼ 0 ) Y1 ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0 ) Y3 ¼ 0

dILcplg ðjÞ dIL ðjÞ dIL


¼ 0 ) Y4 ¼ 0; eplg ¼ 0 ) Y5 ¼ 0; cplg jY ðjÞ ¼0 ) iLcplg  k þ y4 ¼ 0
dt dt dt 4

dILeplg
j ðjÞ ) iLeplg  k  ekt ¼ y5  ekt ; iLeplg  k þ y5 ¼ 0
dt Y5 ¼0

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


IRs ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekt ; IRb2 ðtÞ ¼ IRb2 þ iRb2  ekt ; IRCe ðtÞ ¼ IRCe þ iRCe  ekt

ðjÞ ðjÞ dIL1


ILcplg ðtÞ ¼ ILcplg þ iLcplg  ekt ; ILeplg ðtÞ ¼ ILeplg þ iLeplg  ekt ; Y1 ¼ j ðjÞ ) y1  ekt
dt Y1 ¼0
¼ iL1  k  ekt

dIL3
iL1  k þ y1 ¼ 0; Y2 ¼ j ðjÞ ) y2  ekt ¼ iL3  k  ekt ; iL3  k þ y2 ¼ 0
dt Y2 ¼0
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 419

dIRload
Y3 ¼ j ðjÞ ) y3  ekt ¼ iRload  k  ekt ; iRload  k þ y3 ¼ 0
dt Y3 ¼0  
dY3
ICc2  IRload ¼ C2  Y3  Rload þ L4 
dt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ICc2 þ iCc2  ekt  IRload  iRload  ekt ¼ C2  ðY3 þ y3  ekt Þ  Rload þ L4  y3  k  ekt Þ

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


@ fixed point dY3
dt ¼ 0 ) ICc2  IRload  C2  Rload  Y3 ¼ 0

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


ICc2  IRload  C2  Y3  Rload þ iCc2  ekt  iRload  ekt
¼ y3  C2  Rload  ekt þ C2  L4  y3  k  ekt

iCc2  ekt  iRload  ekt ¼ y3  C2  Rload  ekt þ C2  L4  y3  k  ekt

y3  C2  Rload þ C2  L4  y3  k ¼ iCc2  iRload


) y3  C2  L4  k  y3  C2  Rload þ iCc2  iRload
¼0
 
dXs ðtÞ dIRs dY1 dIRb2 dY2
! e; IL1 ¼ CC1    R s  L1    Rb2  L3 
dt dt dt dt dt
ðjÞ
IL1 þ iL1  ekt ¼ CC1  ðiRs  k  ekt  Rs  L1  y1  k  ekt  iRb2  k  ekt  Rb2  L3
 y2  k  ekt Þ

ðjÞ
@ fixed point IL1 ¼ 0; iL1 ¼ CC1  ðiRs  Rs  L1  y1  iRb2  Rb2  L3  y2 Þ  k
 
1 1 IR dIR d 2 ILcplg d 2 ILeplg
ICc2  þ  load  ce  Rce þ Lcplg  ¼ L eplg 
Cc2 C2 C2 dt dt2 dt2
 
1 1 IR dIR dY4 dY5
ICc2  þ  load  ce  Rce þ Lcplg  ¼ Leplg 
Cc2 C2 C2 dt dt dt
 
   1 1
 I
ðjÞ
R þ i R  e kt
ðjÞ load
ICc2 þ iCc2  ekt   iRCe  k  ekt  Rce
load
þ 
Cc2 C2 C2
þ Lcplg  y4  k  ekt ¼ Leplg  y5  k  ekt

ðjÞ
ðjÞ IR
@ fixed point ICc2  ðC1c2 þ C2 Þ
1
 load
C2 ¼0
420 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

ðjÞ
ðjÞ 1 1 1 1 IR iR
ICc2 ð þ Þ þ iCc2  ð þ Þ  ekt  load  load  ekt  iRCe  k  ekt  Rce
Cc2 C2 Cc2 C2 C2 C2
kt kt
þ Lcplg  y4  k  e ¼ Leplg  y5  k  e

ðjÞ
ðjÞ 1 1 IR 1 1 iR
fICc2 ð þ Þ  load g þ iCc2  ð þ Þ  ekt  load  ekt  iRCe  k  ekt  Rce
Cc2 C2 C2 Cc2 C2 C2
kt kt
þ Lcplg  y4  k  e ¼ Leplg  y5  k  e
 
1 1 iR
iCc2  þ  ekt  load  ekt  iRCe  k  ekt  Rce þ Lcplg  y4  k  ekt
Cc2 C2 C2
¼ Leplg  y5  k  ekt

1 1 iR
iCc2  ð þ Þ  load  iRCe  k  Rce þ Lcplg  y4  k ¼ Leplg  y5  k
Cc2 C2 C2

 Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network system matrix


iLcplg ; iLeplg ; iL1 ; iL3 ; iRload ; iCc2 ; iRs ; iRb2 ; iRCe ; y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ; y5 can be constructed from
the below list of equations:

 iLcplg  k þ y4 ¼ 0; iLeplg  k þ y5 ¼ 0; iL1  k þ y1 ¼ 0; iL3  k þ y2 ¼ 0;


 iRload  k þ y3 ¼ 0

y3  C2  L4  k  y3  C2  Rload þ iCc2  iRload ¼ 0

iL1 ¼ CC1  ðiRs  Rs  L1  y1  iRb2  Rb2  L3  y2 Þ  k


 
1 1 iR
iCc2  þ  load  iRCe  k  Rce þ Lcplg  y4  k ¼ Leplg  y5  k
Cc2 C2 C2

Assumption: We consider for simplicity that arbitrarily small increments ele-


ments iRs ; y1 ; iRb2 ; y2 are proximally the same iRs  y1  iRb2  y2 ! z1 and we
represent them as small increment element z1 . Additionally, arbitrarily small
increments elements iRCe ; y4 ; y5 are proximally the same iRCe  y4  y5 ! z2 and we
represent them as small increment element z2 .

 iLcplg  k þ z2 ¼ 0; iLeplg  k þ z2 ¼ 0; iL1  k þ z1 ¼ 0; iL3  k þ z1 ¼ 0;


 iRload  k þ y3 ¼ 0
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 421

Rload 1 1
y3  k  y3  þ iCc2   iRload 
L4 C2  L4 C2  L4
1
¼ 0; z1  k  iL1  ¼0
CC1  ðRs þ L1 þ Rb2 þ L3 Þ
 
Cc2 þ C2
1 1
iRload
z2  k þ iCc2   ¼0
ðRce  Lcplg þ Leplg Þ C2  ðRce  Lcplg þ Leplg Þ

Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network system matrixes:


0 1
iLcplg
00 1
B C
B iLeplg C
B C B0 C
0 1 B C B
B i L1 C B 0
C
C
i11 . . . i18 B C B C
B .. .. .. C B
B i L C
3 C
B
B
0 C
C  iCc2 ¼ 0
@ . . . AB CþB0 C
B iRload C B 1 C
i81    i88 B C B C2 L4 C
B y3 C B C
B C @0 1 1 A
B C ðC þ C Þ
@ z1 A c2 2
ðRce Lcplg þ Leplg Þ
z2

i11 ¼ k; i12 ¼ . . . ¼ i17 ¼ 0; i18 ¼ 1; i21 ¼ 0; i22 ¼ k; i23 ¼ . . . ¼ i27 ¼ 0; i28 ¼ 1

i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k; i34 ¼ i35 ¼ i36 ¼ 0; i37 ¼ 1; i38 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ i42 ¼ i43 ¼ 0;
i44 ¼ k

i45 ¼ i46 ¼ 0; i47 ¼ 1; i48 ¼ 0; i51 ¼ . . . ¼ i54 ¼ 0; i55 ¼ k; i56 ¼ 1; i57 ¼ i58 ¼ 0

1 Rload
i61 ¼ . . . ¼ i64 ¼ 0; i65 ¼  ; i66 ¼ k  ; i67 ¼ i68 ¼ 0
C2  L4 L4
1
i71 ¼ i72 ¼ 0; i73 ¼  ; i74 ¼ i75 ¼ i76 ¼ 0; i77 ¼ k; i78 ¼ 0
CC1  ðRs þ L1 þ Rb2 þ L3 Þ

1
i81 ¼ . . . ¼ i84 ¼ 0; i85 ¼  ; i86 ¼ i87 ¼ 0; i88 ¼ k
C2  ðRce  Lcplg þ Leplg Þ
422 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

0 1
0 1 iLcplg
0 B C
B0 C B iLeplg C
B C B C
B0 C 0 1 B C
B C B i L1 C
B0 C i11 . . . i18 B C
B C .. C B i L3 C
We consider B C ! eB .
@ ..
.. B C0
B01 C . . AB C
B C B iRload C
B C2 L4 C i81    i88 B C
B0   C B y3 C
B C B C
@ þ C1 A B C
@ z1 A
1
Cc2 2
ðRce Lcplg þ Leplg Þ
z2
0 1 0 1
i11 . . . i18 i11 ... i18
B .. .. .. C B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A ; det(A  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) det@ . . . A¼0
i81    i88 i81  i88

To effectively apply the stability criterion of Lipunov to our system, we require a


criterion for when the equation detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 has a zero in the left half plane,
without calculating the eigenvalues explicitly. We use criterion of Routh-Hurwitz
[2–4].

4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s Matching


Network and Transformation

In (4.1) we discuss the stability and fixed points (equilibrium points) analysis of
Small Signal (SS) amplifiers with input and output L-matching network. Another
way is to use Small Signal (SS) amplifier with input and output PI & T’s matching
networks. The PI or T matching networks constructed from three elements impe-
dance matching and are used in many narrow band applications. The narrow band is
due to the higher loaded Q over what the L network possesses. PI and T networks
also permit any Q to be selected and always PI and T Q’s (loaded quality factor) is
bigger or equal to the L network Q’s.
 The Qis desired for a particular applications
and is calculated with the formula Q ¼ f2 f
fc
1
when utilizing with high Q inductor.
Q is the loaded quality factor of the matching circuit. fc is the center frequency of
the circuit. f2 is the upper frequency and need to pass with little loss. f1 is the lower
frequency and need to pass with little loss. We consider PI network as a two L
networks which attached back to back. Any PI network can be transformed to an
equivalent T network. This is also known as the Wye-Delta transformation, which
is the terminology used in power distribution and electrical engineering. The PI
matching network is equivalent to the Delta and the T matching network is
equivalent to the Wye (or star) form [25, 26, 33]. The typical RF amplifier sche-
matic with input and output matching circuit is as follow (Fig. 4.7):
4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s … 423

Fig. 4.7 Small Signal (SS) amplifier with PI matching networks

Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions, the BJT can be replaced with linear
Hybrid PI model (Fig. 4.8):

Fig. 4.8 Small Signal (SS) amplifier Hybrid PI model with PI matching networks
424 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Fig. 4.9 Linear Hybrid PI model and additional input and output matching circuits

We need to analyze the stability of typical RF amplifier under RF and small


signal conditions, the BJT can be replaced with linear Hybrid Pi model and addi-
tional input and output matching circuits. We define Xs(t) as the RF source and
Rs RF source parasitic resistance (Fig. 4.9).

Xs ðtÞ  VA1 dVA1 dVA2 dIL


IRs ¼ ; ICa1 ¼ Ca1  ; ICa2 ¼ Ca2  ; VLa ¼VA1  VA2 ¼ La  a
Rs dt dt dt
d
ICC1 ¼ CC1  ðVA2  VA3 Þ; VA1 ¼ VCa1 ; VA2 ¼ VCa2 ; ILa ¼ ICa2 þ ICC1 ; IRs ¼ ILa þ ICa1
dt
dIL VA dIL VA  VA 9
VA3  VA4 ¼ L3  3 ; IRb2 ¼ 4 ; IL3 ¼ IRb2 ; VA3  VA13 ¼ L2  2 ; IRb1 ¼ 13
dt Rb2 dt Rb1
dILbplg VA5  VA6 VA9
VA3  VA5 ¼ Lbplg  ; IRbbp ¼ ; ILbplg ¼ IRbbp ; IRc ¼ ; Vpi ¼ VA6  VA8 ¼ VCe
dt Rbbp Rc
dVpi VA  VA 8 dðVA6  VA7 Þ VA  VA 7 VA  VA8
ICe ¼ Ce  ; IRbpe ¼ 6 ; ICc ¼ Cc  ; IRbpc ¼ 6 ; IRce ¼ 7
dt Rbpe dt Rbpc Rce
dILeplg dILcplg dLLc dðVA10  VA11 Þ
VA8 ¼ Leplg  ; VA7  VA10 ¼ Lcplg  ; VA9  VA10 ¼ Lc  ; ICc2 ¼ Cc2 
dt dt dt dt

dVA11 dIL dVA12


ICb1 ¼ Cb1  ; VLb ¼VA11  VA12 ¼ Lb  b ; VA12 ¼ Vout ; ICb2 ¼ Cb2  ;
dt dt dt
Vout VA
IRload ¼ ¼ 12
Rload Rload
VA11 ¼ VCb1 ; VA12 ¼ VCb2 ; ICc2 ¼ ILb þ ICb1 ; ILb ¼ ICb2 þ IRload
4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s … 425

Table 4.2 Linear Hybrid PI model and additional matching circuits Kirchhoff’s Current Law
(KCL) for all nodes
Node KCL @ Ai Node KCL @ Ai
number number
A1 IRs ¼ ILa þ ICa1 A8 ICe þ IRbpe þ gm  Vpi þ IRce ¼ ILeplg
A2 ILa ¼ ICa2 þ ICC1 A9 IRb1 ¼ IRc þ ILc
A3 ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILbplg þ IL3 A10 ILc þ ILcplg ¼ ICc2
A4 IL3 ¼ IRb2 A11 ICc2 ¼ ILb þ ICb1
A5 ILbplg ¼ IRbbp A12 ILb ¼ ICb2 þ IRload
A6 IRbbp ¼ IRbpc þ ICc þ IRbpe þ ICe A13 IL2 ¼ IRb1
A7 ICc þ IRbpc ¼ gm  Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg

We can write our circuit Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL) for all nodes:

Xs ðtÞ  VA1
IRs ¼ ) IRs  Rs ¼ Xs ðtÞ  VA1 ) VA1 ¼ Xs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs
Rs
dVA1 d dXs ðtÞ dIR
ICa1 ¼ Ca1  ¼ Ca1  ðXs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs Þ ¼ Ca1   Ca1  Rs  s
dt dt dt dt
dILa dILa dIL
VLa ¼VA1  VA2 ¼ La  ) VA2 ¼ VA1  La  ¼ Xs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  La  a
dt dt dt
dVA2 d dILa
ICa2 ¼ Ca2  ¼ Ca2  ðXs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  La  Þ
dt dt dt
dXs ðtÞ dIR d 2 IL
¼ Ca2   Ca2  Rs  s  Ca2  La  2 a
dt dt dt
d dVA2 dVA3
ICC1 ¼ CC1  ðVA2  VA3 Þ ¼ CC1   C C1 
dt dt dt
d dILa dVA3
¼ CC1  ðXs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  La  Þ  C C1 
dt dt dt
d dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL
ICC1 ¼ CC1  ðVA2  VA3 Þ ¼ CC1    CC1  Rs  CC1  La  2 a
dt dt dt dt
dVA3
 CC1 
dt

VA4 dIL dIL


IRb2 ¼ ) VA4 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 ; VA3  VA4 ¼ L3  3 ) VA3 ¼ VA4 þ L3  3
Rb2 dt dt
dIL3
¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3 
dt

dVA3 dVA4 d 2 IL dIRb2 d 2 IL


¼ þ L3  2 3 ¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3
dt dt dt dt dt
426 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

System equation No. 1:

d
ICC1 ¼ CC1  ðVA2  VA3 Þ
dt
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIR
¼ CC1    CC1  Rs  CC1  La  2 a  CC1  ð b2  Rb2 þ L3
dt dt dt dt
d 2 I L3
 2 Þ
dt

dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIR


ICC1 ¼ CC1    CC1  Rs  CC1  La  2 a  b2  CC1  Rb2
dt dt dt dt
d 2 I L3
 C C1  L3  2
dt
dIL2 dIL dIL dIL
VA3  VA13 ¼ L2  ) VA13 ¼ VA3  L2  2 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  L2  2
dt dt dt dt

VA13  VA9
IRb1 ¼ ) IRb1  Rb1 ¼ VA13  VA9 ) VA9 ¼ VA13  IRb1  Rb1
Rb1

dIL3 dIL
VA9 ¼ VA13  IRb1  Rb1 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   L2  2  IRb1  Rb1
dt dt
dILbplg dIL dIL
VA3  VA5 ¼ Lbplg  ) VA5 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg
dt dt dt
VA5  VA6
IRbbp ¼ ) IRbbp  Rbbp ¼ VA5  VA6 ) VA6
Rbbp
dIL dIL
¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp
dt dt
VA9 VA  VA8
IRc ¼ ) VA9 ¼ IRc  Rc ; IRbpe ¼ 6 ) IRbpe  Rbpe
Rc Rbpe
¼ VA6  VA8 ) VA8 ¼ VA6  IRbpe  Rbpe
dIL3 dIL
VA8 ¼ VA6  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp
dt dt
 IRbpe  Rbpe

dðVA6  VA7 Þ VA  VA7


I Cc ¼ C c  ; IRbpc ¼ 6 ) I Cc
dt Rbpc
dIR
¼ Cc  Rbpc  bpc ; VA7  VA8 ¼IRce  Rce
dt
4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s … 427

dIL3 dIL
VA7 ¼VA8 þ IRce  Rce ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe
dt dt
 Rbpe þ IRce  Rce

System equation No. 2:

dILeplg dIL dIL


VA8 ¼ Leplg  ) IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe
dt dt dt
dILeplg
¼ Leplg 
dt

dILcplg dIL
VA7  VA10 ¼ Lcplg  ) VA10 ¼ VA7  Lcplg  cplg
dt dt
dIL dIL
VA10 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe þ IRce  Rce
dt dt
dILcplg
 Lcplg 
dt
dLLc dLLc dVA10 ICc2 IC
VA9  VA10 ¼ Lc  ) VA9 ¼ VA10 þ Lc  ; ¼ þ b1
dt dt dt Cc2 Cb1

dIL dIL
VA9 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe þ IRce  Rce
dt dt
dILcplg dLLc
 Lcplg  þ Lc 
dt dt
 
dðVA10  VA11 Þ dVA10 dVA11
ICc2 ¼ Cc2  ) ICc2 ¼ Cc2   ) ICc2
 dt  dt dt
dVA10 ICb1
¼ Cc2  
dt Cb1

System equation No. 3:



ICc2 IC d dIL dIL
þ b1 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp
Cc2 Cb1 dt dt dt
dILcplg o
IRbpe  Rbpe þ IRce  Rce  Lcplg 
dt

ICc2 IC dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg dIRbbp dIR


þ b1 ¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg  2
  Rbbp  bpe
Cc2 Cb1 dt dt dt dt dt
dIRce d 2 ILcplg
 Rbpe þ  Rce  Lcplg 
dt dt2
428 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

dILb dIL VA
VA11  VA12 ¼ Lb  ) VA11 ¼ VA12 þ Lb  b ; IRload ¼ 12 ) VA12
dt dt Rload
¼ IRload  Rload

System equation No. 4:

dILb dVA12 dIR


VA11 ¼ IRload  Rload þ Lb  ; VA12 ¼ VCb2 ; ICb2 ¼ Cb2  ¼ Cb2  Rload  load
dt dt dt
dIRload
ILb ¼ ICb2 þ IRload ) ILb ¼ Cb2  Rload  þ IRload
dt

We can summery our system equations:

dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIR


ICC1 ¼ CC1    CC1  Rs  CC1  La  2 a  b2  CC1  Rb2  CC1  L3
dt dt dt dt
d 2 I L3

dt2

dIL3 dIL dIL


IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ Leplg  eplg
dt dt dt

ICc2 IC dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg dIRbbp dIR


þ b1 ¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg    Rbbp  bpe
Cc2 Cb1 dt dt dt2 dt dt
dIRce d 2 ILcplg
 Rbpe þ  Rce  Lcplg 
dt dt2
dIRload
ILb ¼ Cb2  Rload  þ IRload
dt

Since
ICc2 ¼ ILb þ ICb1 ) ICb1 ¼ ICc2  ILb ; ILb ¼ ICb2 þ IRload ; ICb1 ¼ ICc2  ICb2  IRload

dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIR


ICC1 ¼ CC1    CC1  Rs  CC1  La  2 a  b2  CC1  Rb2  CC1  L3
dt dt dt dt
d 2 I L3

dt2

dIL3 dIL dIL


IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ Leplg  eplg
dt dt dt
4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s … 429

ICc2 IC dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg dIRbbp dIR


þ b1 ¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg  2
  Rbbp  bpe
Cc2 Cb1 dt dt dt dt dt
dIRce d 2 ILcplg
 Rbpe þ  Rce  Lcplg 
dt dt2
 
d dIL3 dILbplg d 2 ILeplg
IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg   IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ Leplg 
dt dt dt dt2

ICc2 ICb1 d 2 ILeplg dIRce


We get one differential equation: Cc2 þ Cb1 ¼ Leplg  dt2 þ dt  Rce
2
d ILcplg
Lcplg  dt2
 
1 1 IL
ICb1 ¼ ICc2  ILb ) ICc2  þ  b
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1
d 2 ILeplg dIRce d 2 ILcplg
¼ Leplg  þ  Rce  Lcplg 
dt2 dt dt2

We get for our system three differential equations:

dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIR d 2 IL


ICC1 ¼ CC1    CC1  Rs  CC1  La  2 a  b2  CC1  Rb2  CC1  L3  2 3
dt dt dt dt dt
 
1 1 IL b d 2 ILeplg dIRce d 2 ILcplg
ICc2  þ  ¼ Leplg  þ  Rce  Lcplg  ;
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1 dt2 dt dt2
dIR
ILb ¼ Cb2  Rload  load þ IRload
dt

We need to find our system equilibrium points (fixed points). It is done by


dIRs 2 dIRb2 dIL3 d 2 IL3
setting dt ¼ 0; dIdtLa ¼ 0 ) ddtI2La ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ) dt2 ¼0

dILeplg d 2 ILeplg dIRce dILcplg d 2 ILcplg dIR


¼0) ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ) ¼ 0; load ¼ 0
dt dt2 dt dt dt2 dt

We get the system fixed points (equilibrium points):

dXs ðtÞ  1 1 IL


IC C ¼ CC1  ; ICc2  ð þ Þ  b ¼ 0 ) ILb
1 dt Cc2 Cb1 Cb1
1 1
¼ IC c2 ð þ  
Þ  Cb1 ; ILb ¼ IRload
Cc2 Cb1

We consider input RF source Xs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ;jnðtÞj\1&A0 jnðtÞj


dXs ðtÞjA jnðtÞj
Then. Xs ðtÞjA0 jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ  A0 ; dt
0
¼ dnðtÞ
dt ! e:
430 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Based on the above assumption, we get the following system fixed points:
   
1 1 ILb 1 1
IC C ¼ 0; IC c2  þ   
¼ 0 ) ILb ¼ ICc2  þ  Cb1 ; ILb
1 Cc2 Cb1 Cb1 Cc2 Cb1
¼ IRload
 
E IC C ; IRs ; ILa ; IRb2 ; IL3 ; IC c2 ; ILb ; ILeplg ; IRce ; ILcplg ; IRload
  
1

1 1
¼ 0; IRs ; ILa ; IRb2 ; IL3 ; IC c2 ; IC c2  þ  Cb1 ; ILeplg ; IRce ; ILcplg ; IC c2
   C c2 C b1

 C1c2 þ 1
Cb1  Cb1

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the Smallh Signal (SS) amplifier with matching networki
consists in adding to coordinate ICC1 ; IRs ; ILa ; IRb2 ; IL3 ; ICc2 ; ILb ; ILeplg ; IRce ; ILcplg ; IRload
arbitrarily small increments of exponentially form ½iCC1 ; iRs ; iLa ; iRb2 ; iL3 ;
iCc2 ; iLb ; iLeplg ; iRce ; iLcplg ; iRload   ekt and retaining the first order terms in
ICC1 ; IRs ; ILa ; IRb2 ; IL3 ; ICc2 ; ILb ; ILeplg ; IRce ; ILcplg ; IRload [3, 4]. The system of homogenous
equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The
polynomial characteristic equations accept by set of the below circuit variables,
circuit variables derivative and circuit variables second order derivative with respect
to time into Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network equivalent circuit.
Our Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network equivalent circuit fixed
values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½iCC1 ; iRs ; iLa ; iRb2 ; iL3 ;
iCc2 ; iLb ; iLeplg ; iRce ; iLcplg ; iRload   ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed
point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
2 dIL3 d 2 IL3
We define new variables: Y1 ¼ dIdtLa ) dYdt1 ¼ ddtI2La ; Y2 ¼ dt ) dYdt2 ¼ dt2
 
dXs ðtÞ dIR dY1 dIRb2 dY2
ICC1 ¼ CC1  ! e  s  CC1  Rs  CC1  La    CC1  Rb2  CC1  L3 
dt dt dt dt dt
2 2
dIL dY3 d ILeplg dIL dY4 d ILcplg
Y3 ¼ eplg ) ¼ ; Y4 ¼ cplg ) ¼
dt dt dt2 dt dt dt2
 
1 1 I Lb dY3 dIRce dY4
ICc2  þ  ¼ Leplg  þ  Rce  Lcplg 
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1 dt dt dt
4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s … 431

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ; Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ICc1 ðtÞ ¼ ICc1 þ iCc1  ekt ; IRs ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekt ; IRb2 ðtÞ ¼ IRb2 þ iRb2  ekt ; ICc2 ðtÞ ¼ ICc2 þ iCc2  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ dIRs ðtÞ dY1 ðtÞ
ILb ðtÞ ¼ ILb þ iLb  ekt ; IRce ðtÞ ¼ IRce þ iRce  ekt ; ¼ iRs  k  ekt ; ¼ y1  k  ekt
dt dt
dIRb2 ðtÞ dY2 ðtÞ ðjÞ dIR ðtÞ
¼ iRb2  k  ekt ; ¼ y2  k  ekt ; IRload ðtÞ ¼ IRload þ iRload  ekt ; load ¼ iRload  k  ekt
dt dt dt

dILa ðjÞ dIL3 ðjÞ dILeplg ðjÞ


At fixed point dt ¼ 0 ) Y1 ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0 ) Y3 ¼ 0

dILcplg ðjÞ dIL


¼ 0 ) Y4 ¼ 0; Y1 ¼ a jY ðjÞ ¼0 ) y1  ekt ¼ iLa  k  ekt ; y1  iLa  k ¼ 0
dt dt 1
dIL3 dIL
Y2 ¼ jY ðjÞ ¼0 ) y2  ekt ¼ iL3  k  ekt ; y2  iL3  k ¼ 0; Y3 ¼ eplg jY ðjÞ ¼0
dt 2 dt 3

) y3  ekt ¼ iLeplg  k  ekt

dILcplg
y3  iLeplg  k ¼ 0; Y4 ¼ j ðjÞ ) y4  ekt ¼ iLcplg  k  ekt ;
dt Y4 ¼0
dXs ðtÞ
y4  iLcplg  k ¼ 0; !e¼0
dt
dIRs dY1 dIRb2 dY2
I CC 1 ¼   CC1  Rs  CC1  La    CC1  Rb2  CC1  L3 
dt dt dt dt
ðjÞ
ICc1 þ iCc1  ekt ¼ iRs  k  ekt  CC1  Rs  CC1  La  y1  k  ekt  iRb2  k  ekt  CC1
 Rb2  CC1  L3  y2  k  ekt

ðjÞ
@ fixed point ICc1 ¼ 0 ; iCc1 ¼ ðiRs  Rs þ La  y1 þ iRb2  Rb2 þ L3  y2 Þ  CC1  k
We divide the two side of the above equation by iCc1 term

iCc1 ¼ iRs  k  CC1  Rs  CC1  La  y1  k  iRb2  k  CC1  Rb2  CC1  L3  y2  k


 
1 1 IL dY3 dIRce dY4
ICc2  þ  b ¼ Leplg  þ  Rce  Lcplg 
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1 dt dt dt
432 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

 
   1 1
 I
ðjÞ
Lb þ i L  e kt
ðjÞ b
ICc2 þ iCc2  ekt  þ 
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1
¼ Leplg  y3  k  ekt þ iRce  k  ekt  Rce  Lcplg  y4  k  ekt
  I
 
@ fixed point IC c2  1
Cc2 þ 1
Cb1  CLb1b ¼ 0 ) ILb ¼ IC c2  1
Cc2 þ 1
Cb1  Cb1
(   ðjÞ
)  
ðjÞ 1 1 IL 1 1 iLb  ekt
ICc2  þ  b þ iCc2  þ  ekt 
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1 Cc2 Cb1 Cb1
¼ Leplg  y3  k  ekt þ iRce  k  ekt  Rce  Lcplg  y4  k  ekt
 
1 1 iL  ekt
iCc2  þ  ekt  b ¼ Leplg  y3  k  ekt þ iRce  k  ekt  Rce  Lcplg
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1
 y4  k  ekt

We divide the two side of the above equation by ekt term.


 
1 1 iLb
iCc2  þ  ¼ Leplg  y3  k þ iRce  k  Rce  Lcplg  y4  k
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1

dIRload ðjÞ
ILb ¼ Cb2  Rload  þ IRload ) ILb þ iLb  ekt
dt
ðjÞ
¼ Cb2  Rload  iRload  k  ekt þ IRload þ iRload  ekt

@ fixed point ILb ¼ IRload ; ILb ¼ IC c2  ðC1c2 þ Cb1 Þ


1
 Cb1
n o
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ILb  IRload þ iLb  ekt ¼ Cb2  Rload  iRload  k  ekt þ iRload
n o
ðjÞ ðjÞ
 ekt ; ILb  IRload jI  ¼I 
Lb Rload

¼0

Cb2  Rload  iRload  k  ekt ¼ iLb  ekt  iRload  ekt ) iLb  iRload  Cb2  Rload  iRload  k
¼0

We can summery our Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network (PI
input and output matching networks) small increments elements:
4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s … 433

y1  iLa  k ¼ 0; y2  iL3  k ¼ 0; y3  iLeplg  k ¼ 0; y4  iLcplg  k ¼ 0

iCc1 ¼ iRs  k  CC1  Rs  CC1  La  y1  k  iRb2  k  CC1  Rb2  CC1  L3  y2  k


 
1 1 iL
iCc2  þ  b ¼ Leplg  y3  k þ iRce  k  Rce  Lcplg  y4  k
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1

iLb  iRload  Cb2  Rload  iRload  k ¼ 0

Assumption: We consider for simplicity that arbitrarily small increments


elements iRs ; y1 ; iRb2 ; y2 are proximally the same iRs  y1  iRb2  y2 ! z1 and we
represent them as small increment element z1 . Additionally, arbitrarily small
increments elements y3 ; iRCe ; y4 are proximally the same y3  iRCe  y4 ! z2 and we
represent them as small increment element z2 .

z1  iLa  k ¼ 0; z2  iL3  k ¼ 0; z3  iLeplg  k ¼ 0; z4  iLcplg  k ¼ 0

1
iCc1   z1  k ¼ 0
ðCC1  Rs þ CC1  La þ CC1  Rb2 þ CC1  L3 Þ
 
1
Cc2 þ 1
Cb1 i Lb
iCc2    z2  k ¼ 0
ðLeplg þ Rce  Lcplg Þ Cb1  ðLeplg þ Rce  Lcplg Þ

iLb  iRload  Cb2  Rload  iRload  k ¼ 0


1 1
) i Lb   iRload   iRload  k
Cb2  Rload Cb2  Rload
¼0

Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network system matrixes:


0 1
i La
B i C
B L3 C
0 1 B C 0 1 0 1
i11 . . . i17 B iLeplg C u11 . . . u13 iCc1
B C
B .. .. .. C B C B .. .. .. C  B i C ¼ 0
@ . . . AB iL C þ @ .
B cplg C . . A @ Cc2 A
i71    i77 B C u71    u73 iLb
B z1 C
B C
@ z2 A
iRload
434 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

i11 ¼ k; i12 ¼ i13 ¼ i14 ¼ 0; i15 ¼ 1; i16 ¼ i17 ¼ 0; i21 ¼ 0; i22 ¼ k;
i23 ¼ i24 ¼ 0; i25 ¼ 1; i26 ¼ i27 ¼ 0

i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k; i34 ¼ i35 ¼ 0; i36 ¼ 1; i37 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ i42 ¼ i43 ¼ 0

i44 ¼ k; i45 ¼ 0; i46 ¼ 1; i47 ¼ 0; i51 ¼ . . . ¼ i54 ¼ 0; i55 ¼ k; i56 ¼ i57 ¼ 0

1
i61 ¼ i65 ¼ 0; i66 ¼ k; i67 ¼ 0; i71 ¼ . . . ¼ i76 ¼ 0; i77 ¼ k 
Cb2  Rload

u11 ¼ u12 ¼ u13 ¼ 0; u21 ¼ u22 ¼ u23 ¼ 0; u31 ¼ u32 ¼ u33 ¼ 0; u41 ¼ u42
¼ u43 ¼ 0

1
u51 ¼  ; u ¼ u53 ¼ 0
ðCC1  Rs þ CC1  La þ CC1  Rb2 þ CC1  L3 Þ 52

ðC1c2 þ Cb1 Þ
1
1
u61 ¼ 0; u62 ¼ ; u63 ¼ 
ðLeplg þ Rce  Lcplg Þ Cb1  ðLeplg þ Rce  Lcplg Þ

1
u71 ¼ u72 ¼ 0; u73 ¼
Cb2  Rload
0 1
i La
B i C
B L3 C
0 1 0 1 B C
u11 ... u13 i11 . . . i17 B iLeplg C
B C
B .. .. .. C ! e; B .. .. . C B C
We consider @ . . . A @ . . .. A  B
B
iLcplg C  0
C
u71  u73 i71    i77 B z C
B 1C
B C
@ z2 A
iRload
0 1 0 1
i11 ... i17 i11 . . . i17
B .. .. .. C B .. .. . C
AkI ¼@ . . . A; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) det@ . . .. A ¼ 0
i71  i77 i71    i77

To effectively apply the stability criterion of Lipunov to our system, we require a


criterion for when the equation detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 has a zero in the left half plane,
without calculating the eigenvalues explicitly. We use criterion of Routh-Hurwitz
[2–4].
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 435

4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network


Stability Analysis Under Microstrip Parasitic
Parameters Variation

In our stability analysis of Small Signal (SS) amplifiers which include input and
output matching networks, we need to consider the microstrip lines that connect our
input RF source to input matching network and input matching network to Small
Signal (SS) amplifier. Additionally there is a microstrip lines between Small Signal
(SS) amplifier to the output matching network and between output matching net-
work to the load (Rload). We represent in our stability analysis the microstrip lines
as a parasitic delay lines in time. We define our microstrip line’s delay parameters
as s1, s2, s3, s4 respectively. Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions, the BJT
can be replaced with linear Hybrid PI model, input and output matching circuits, RF
input source, load resistance and microstrip delay lines. The amplifier matching
networks types are L matching network in our analysis [25, 26, 33] (Fig. 4.10).
Remark: microstrip lines have many parasitic effects. We neglect all those effects
and concentrate on representation of microstrip line as a delay line. We consider
that the voltage on microstrip delay line is very small and the assumption that the
current flow through each microstrip is delay in time.
If we define the voltage on (i) delay line as Vsi (i = 1, 2, 3…). Vsi ! e . If we
define the current that flow through microstrip as a IðtÞ then the effect of parasitic
delay in time is Iðt  si Þ.IðtÞ ! Iðt  si Þ. We consider the following:
Tau1 = s1, Tau2 = s2, Tau3 = s3, Tau4 = s4, Vs1 ¼ ðVA11  VA12 Þ ! e;
Vs2 ¼ ðVA21  VA22 Þ ! e

Fig. 4.10 Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching networks (Hybrid PI equivalent circuit for
BJT transistor)
436 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Vs3 ¼ ðVA111  VA112 Þ ! e; Vs4 ¼ ðVA121  VA122 Þ ! e;


ðVA11  VA12 Þ ! e ) VA1 ¼ VA11 ¼ VA12
ðVA21  VA22 Þ ! e ) VA2 ¼ VA21 ¼ VA22 ;
ðVA111  VA112 Þ ! e ) VA11 ¼ VA111 ¼ VA112
ðVA121  VA122 Þ ! e ) VA12 ¼ VA121 ¼ VA122

Xs ðtÞ  VA1 dVA1 dIL d


IR s ¼ ; I C1 ¼ C 1  ; VA1  VA2 ¼ L1  1 ; ICC1 ¼ CC1  ðVA2  VA3 Þ
Rs dt dt dt
dIL VA
IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ICc1 ðtÞ; VA3  VA4 ¼ L3  3 ; IRb2 ¼ 4 ; IL3 ¼ IRb2 ;
dt Rb2
dIL2 VA13  VA9
VA3  VA13 ¼ L2  ; IRb1 ¼
dt Rb1
dILbplg VA  VA 6 VA
VA3  VA5 ¼ Lbplg  ; IRbbp ¼ 5 ; ILbplg ¼ IRbbp ; IRc ¼ 9 ;
dt Rbbp Rc
Vpi ¼ VA6  VA8 ¼ VCe
dVpi VA  VA 8 dðVA6  VA7 Þ VA  VA7
I Ce ¼ C e  ; IRbpe ¼ 6 ; I Cc ¼ C c  ; IRbpc ¼ 6 ;
dt Rbpe dt Rbpc
VA  VA 8
IRce ¼ 7
Rce
dIL dIL dLLc
VA8 ¼ Leplg  eplg ; VA7  VA10 ¼ Lcplg  cplg ; VA9  VA10 ¼ Lc  ;
dt dt dt
dðVA10  VA11 Þ
ICc2 ¼ Cc2 
dt

dVA11 dIL Vout VA


I C2 ¼ C 2  ; VA11  VA12 ¼ L4  4 ; VA12 ¼ Vout ; IL4 ¼ IRload ; IRload ¼ ¼ 12
dt dt Rload Rload

We can write our circuit Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL) for all nodes:

Table 4.3 Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching networks circuit Kirchhoff’s Current Law
(KCL) for all nodes
Node number KCL @ Ai Node number KCL @ Ai
A1 IRs ðt  s1 Þ ¼ IL1 ðtÞ þ IC1 ðtÞ A8 ICe þ IRbpe þ gm  Vpi þ IRce ¼ ILeplg
(A1 = A1-1 = A1-2)
A2 IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ICc1 ðtÞ A9 IRb1 ¼ IRc þ ILc
(A2 = A2-1 = A2-2)
A3 ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILbplg þ IL3 A10 ILc þ ILcplg ¼ ICc2
A4 IL3 ¼ IRb2 A11 ICc2 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ IL4 ðtÞ þ IC2 ðtÞ
(A11 = A11-1 = A11-2)
A5 ILbplg ¼ IRbbp A12 IL4 ðt  s4 Þ ¼ IRload ðtÞ
(A12 = A12-1 = A12-2)
A6 IRbbp ¼ IRbpc þ ICc þ IRbpe þ ICe A13 IL2 ¼ IRb1
A7 ICc þ IRbpc ¼ gm  Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 437

Xs ðtÞ  VA1
IRs ¼ ) IRs  Rs ¼ Xs ðtÞ  VA1 ) VA1 ¼ Xs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs
Rs
dVA1 dXs ðtÞ dIRs
IC1 ¼ C1  ¼ C1  ð   Rs Þ; VA1  VA2
dt dt dt
dIL dIL
¼ L1  1 ) VA2 ¼ VA1  L1  1
dt dt
 
dIL1 dVA2 dVA3
VA2 ¼ Xs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  L1  ; ICC1 ¼ CC1  
 dt dt dt
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dVA3
¼ CC1    Rs  L1  2 
dt dt dt dt

VA4 dIL
IRb2 ¼ ) VA4 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 ; VA3  VA4 ¼ L3  3 ) VA3
Rb2 dt
dIL3 dVA3 dIRb2 d 2 IL
¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  ; ¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3
dt dt dt dt
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dIRb2 d 2 IL
I CC 1 ¼ CC1  ð   Rs  L1  2   Rb2  L3  2 3 Þ
dt dt dt dt dt
IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ ICc1 ðtÞ; IL1 ðtÞ¼IRs ðt  s1 Þ  IC1 ðtÞ; ICc1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ
¼ IRs ðt  s1  s2 Þ  IC1 ðt  s2 Þ

P
2
ICc1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IRs ðt  si Þ  IC1 ðt  s2 Þ System equation No. 1:
i¼1
!
X
2
IRs t  si  IC1 ðt  s2 Þ
i¼1
 
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dIRb2 d 2 I L3
¼ CC1    Rs  L1  2   Rb2  L3  2
dt dt dt dt dt

dIL2 dIL dIL dIL


VA3  VA13 ¼ L2  ) VA13 ¼ VA3  L2  2 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  L2  2
dt dt dt dt

VA13  VA9
IRb1 ¼ ) IRb1  Rb1 ¼ VA13  VA9 ) VA9 ¼ VA13  IRb1  Rb1
Rb1

dIL3 dIL
VA9 ¼ VA13  IRb1  Rb1 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   L2  2  IRb1  Rb1
dt dt
dILbplg dIL dIL
VA3  VA5 ¼ Lbplg  ) VA5 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg
dt dt dt
438 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

VA5  VA6
IRbbp ¼ ) IRbbp  Rbbp ¼ VA5  VA6 ) VA6
Rbbp
dIL dIL
¼ IRb 2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp
dt dt
VA9 VA  VA8
IRc ¼ ) VA9 ¼ IRc  Rc ; IRbpe ¼ 6 ) IRbpe  Rbpe
Rc Rbpe
¼ VA6  VA8 ) VA8 ¼ VA6  IRbpe  Rbpe
dIL3 dIL
VA8 ¼ VA6  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp
dt dt
 IRbpe  Rbpe

dðVA6  VA7 Þ VA  VA7 dIR


I Cc ¼ C c  ; IRbpc ¼ 6 ) ICc ¼ Cc  Rbpc  bpc ;
dt Rbpc dt
VA7  VA8 ¼IRce  Rce

dIL3 dIL
VA7 ¼VA8 þ IRce  Rce ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe
dt dt
 Rbpe þ IRce  Rce

System equation No. 2:

dILeplg dIL dIL


VA8 ¼ Leplg  ) IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe
dt dt dt
dILeplg
¼ Leplg 
dt

dILcplg dIL
VA7  VA10 ¼ Lcplg  ) VA10 ¼ VA7  Lcplg  cplg
dt dt
dIL dIL
VA10 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe þ IRce  Rce
dt dt
dILcplg
 Lcplg 
dt
dLLc dLLc dVA10 ICc2 IC
VA9  VA10 ¼ Lc  ) VA9 ¼ VA10 þ Lc  ; ¼ þ 2
dt dt dt Cc2 C2

dIL dIL
VA9 ¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe þ IRce  Rce
dt dt
dILcplg dLLc
 Lcplg  þ Lc 
dt dt
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 439

dðVA10  VA11 Þ dVA10 dVA11


ICc2 ¼ Cc2  ) ICc2 ¼ Cc2  ð  Þ ) ICc2
dt dt dt
dVA10 IC2
¼ Cc2  ð  Þ
dt C2

ICc2 IC d dIL dIL
þ 2¼ IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe
Cc2 C2 dt dt  dt
dILcplg
þ IRce  Rce  Lcplg 
dt
ICc2 IC2 dIRb2 d 2 I L3 d 2 ILbplg dIRbbp dIR
þ ¼  Rb2 þ L3  2  Lbplg  2
  Rbbp  bpe
Cc2 C2 dt dt dt dt dt
dIRce d 2 ILcplg
 Rbpe þ  Rce  Lcplg 
dt dt2

ICc2 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ IL4 ðtÞ þ IC2 ðtÞ ) IC2 ðtÞ ¼ ICc2 ðt  s3 Þ  IL4 ðtÞ

System equation No. 3:

ICc2 IC ðt  s3 Þ IL4 ðtÞ dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg


þ c2  ¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg  
Cc2 C2 C2 dt dt dt2
dIRbbp dIR dIRce d 2 ILcplg
 Rbbp  bpe  Rbpe þ  Rce  Lcplg 
dt dt dt dt2
dIL4 dIL VA
VA11  VA12 ¼ L4  ) VA11 ¼ VA12 þ L4  4 ; IRload ¼ 12 ) VA12
dt dt Rload
¼ IRload  Rload

System equation No. 4: IRload ðtÞ ¼ IL4 ðt  s4 Þ; IC2 ðtÞ ¼ ICc2 ðt  s3 Þ  IL4 ðtÞ
 
dIL4 dIRload d 2 IL
VA11 ¼ IRload  Rload þ L4  ; IC2 ¼ C2   Rload þ L4  2 4
dt dt dt
 
dIL4 ðt  s4 Þ d 2 I L4
ICc2 ðt  s3 Þ  IL4 ðtÞ ¼ C2   Rload þ L4  2
dt dt

We can summery our system equations:


!
X
2
IR s t  si  IC1 ðt  s2 Þ
i¼1
 
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIR d 2 IL
¼ CC1    Rs  L1  2 1  b2  Rb2  L3  2 3
dt dt dt dt dt
dIL dI L dIL
IRb2  Rb2 þ L3  3  Lbplg  bplg  IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ Leplg  eplg
dt dt dt
440 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

ICc2 IC ðt  s3 Þ IL4 ðtÞ dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg


þ c2  ¼  Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg 
Cc2 C2 C2 dt dt dt2
2
dIR dIR dIRce d ILcplg
 bbp  Rbbp  bpe  Rbpe þ  Rce  Lcplg 
dt dt dt dt2
 
dIL4 ðt  s4 Þ d 2 I L4
ICc2 ðt  s3 Þ  IL4 ðtÞ ¼ C2   Rload þ L4  2
dt dt
 
d dIL3 dILbplg d 2 ILeplg
IRb2  Rb2 þ L3   Lbplg   IRbbp  Rbbp  IRbpe  Rbpe ¼ Leplg 
dt dt dt dt2

dIRb2 d 2 IL d 2 ILbplg dIRbbp dIR d 2 ILeplg


 Rb2 þ L3  2 3  Lbplg  2
  Rbbp  bpe  Rbpe ¼ Leplg 
dt dt dt dt dt dt2

We can merge our system two differential equations to one differential equation:

ICc2 IC ðt  s3 Þ IL4 ðtÞ d 2 ILeplg dIRce d 2 ILcplg


þ c2  ¼ Leplg  þ  R ce  L cplg 
Cc2 C2 C2 dt2 dt dt2

We can summery our system three differential equations:

X
2
IRs ðt  si Þ  IC1 ðt  s2 Þ
i¼1
 
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dIRb2 d 2 I L3
¼ CC1    Rs  L1  2   Rb2  L3  2
dt dt dt dt dt

ICc2 IC ðt  s3 Þ IL4 ðtÞ d 2 ILeplg dIRce d 2 ILcplg


þ c2  ¼ Leplg  þ  R ce  L cplg 
Cc2 C2 C2 dt2 dt dt2
 
dIL4 ðt  s4 Þ d 2 IL
ICc2 ðt  s3 Þ  IL4 ðtÞ ¼ C2   Rload þ L4  2 4
dt dt

To find our equilibrium points (fixed points) of the Small Signal (SS) amplifier
 
P2
with L—matching networks is by lim IRs t  si ¼ IRs ðtÞ;
t!1 i¼1
lim ICc2 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ ICc2 ðtÞ
t!1
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 441

X
2
lim IC1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IC1 ðtÞ; lim IL4 ðt  s4 Þ ¼ IL4 ðtÞ; t  s2 ; t  s4 ; t  si ; t  s 3
t!1 t!1
i¼1
dIRs dIR dIR dIL ðt  s4 Þ dIL d 2 IL
¼ 0; b2 ¼ 0; ce ¼ 0; 4 ¼ 0; 1 ¼ 0 ) 2 1 ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt dt dt
dIL3 d 2 I L3 dILeplg d 2 ILeplg dILcplg d 2 ILcplg
¼ 0 ) 2 ¼ 0; ¼0) ¼ 0; ) ¼0
dt dt dt dt2 dt dt2
dIL4 d 2 IL dXs ðtÞ  1 1 I
¼ 0 ) 2 4 ¼ 0; IRs  IC 1 ¼ CC1  ; ICc2  ð þ Þ  L4 ¼ 0
dt dt dt Cc2 C2 C2
dX ðtÞ
IC c2  IL4 ¼ 0 ) IC c2 ¼ IL4 ;
s
!e
dt

ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILbplg þ IL3 ¼ IL2 þ IRbbp þ IL3 ¼ IL2 þ ðIRbpc þ ICc Þ þ IRbpe þ ICe þ IL3
ICc þ IRbpc ¼ gm  Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg ; ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ðIRbpc þ ICc Þ þ IRbpe þ ICe þ IL3
ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ gm  Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg þ IRbpe þ ICe þ IL3 ; ICe þ IRbpe þ gm  Vpi þ IRce ¼ ILeplg

ICe þ IRbpe þ gm  Vpi ¼ ILeplg  IRce ; ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILeplg  IRce þ IRce þ ILcplg þ IL3
ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILeplg þ ILcplg þ IL3 ; ICc2 ¼ILc þ ILcplg ¼ IRb1  IRc þ ILcplg ;
IRb1 ¼ IRc þ ILc ) ILc ¼ IRb1  IRc

ICc2 ¼ILc þ ILcplg ¼ IRb1  IRc þ ILcplg ¼ IL2  IRc þ ILcplg ; IL2 ¼ICc1  ILbplg  IL3
ICc2 ¼ IL2  IRc þ ILcplg ¼ ICc1  ILbplg  IL3  IRc þ ILcplg ; ICc1 ðtÞ¼IL1 ðt  s2 Þ
ICc2 ¼ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ  ILbplg  IL3  IRc þ ILcplg ; ILbplg ¼IRbbp ¼ IRbpc þ ICc þ IRbpe þ ICe

ILbplg ¼ ðIRbpc þ ICc Þ þ IRbpe þ ICe ; ICc þ IRbpc ¼ gm  Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg
ILbplg ¼ ðgm  Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg Þ þ IRbpe þ ICe ; ICe þ IRbpe þ gm  Vpi þ IRce ¼ ILeplg

ILbplg ¼ ðgm  Vpi þ IRce þ IRbpe þ ICe Þ þ ILcplg ¼ ILeplg þ ILcplg ; ILbplg ¼ ILeplg þ ILcplg
ICc2 ¼ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ  ILbplg  IL3  IRc þ ILcplg ¼ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ  ILeplg  ILcplg
 IL3  IRc þ ILcplg

ICc2 ¼ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ  ILeplg  IL3  IRc ; ICc2 ðt  s3 Þ


¼ IL1 ðt  s2  s3 Þ  ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ  IL3 ðt  s3 Þ  IRc ðt  s3 Þ
!
X
3
ICc2 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ IL1 t  si  ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ  IL3 ðt  s3 Þ  IRc ðt  s3 Þ; IRb2 ¼IL3
i¼2
442 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

We can write our system set of differential equations:


!  
X
2
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIL d 2 IL
I Rs t  si  IC1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ CC1    Rs  L1  2 1  3  Rb2  L3  2 3
i¼1
dt dt dt dt dt

1 1 X3
 ½IL1 ðt  s2 Þ  ILeplg  IL3  IRc  þ  ½IL1 ðt  si Þ  ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ  IL3 ðt  s3 Þ
Cc2 C2 i¼2
IL4 ðtÞ d 2 ILeplg dIRce d 2 ILcplg
 IRc ðt  s3 Þ  ¼ Leplg  þ  Rce  L cplg 
C2 dt2 dt dt2

X
3
IL1 ðt  si Þ  ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ  IL3 ðt  s3 Þ  IRc ðt  s3 Þ  IL4 ðtÞ

i¼2 
dIL4 ðt  s4 Þ d 2 IL
¼ C2   Rload þ L4  2 4
dt dt

Remark: Some of our system variables include time argument X(t) and other
without time argument. Always consider these system variables as a function of
time.
We consider L13 ¼ L1  L3 ; Lecplg ¼Leplg  Lcplg . We define for simplicity of
dIL1 dIL3 d 2 Y2 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL3 dIL3
our analysis new variables: Y1 ¼ dIdtRs ; Y2 ¼ dt þ dt ; dt2 ¼ dt2 þ dt2 ; Y3 ¼ dt .
dIL dILcplg d 2 ILeplg d 2 ILcplg
Y4 ¼ dIdtRce ; Y5 ¼ dteplg  dt ; dY5
dt ¼ dt2  dt2 . The system new set of delay
differential equations:

X
2
dXs ðtÞ dY2
IRs ðt  si Þ  IC1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ CC1  ð  Y1  Rs  L13   Y3  Rb2 Þ
i¼1
dt dt
1 1 X3
 ½IL1 ðt  s2 Þ  ILeplg  IL3  IRc  þ  ½IL1 ðt  si Þ  ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ  IL3 ðt  s3 Þ
Cc2 C2 i¼2
IL4 ðtÞ dY5
 IRc ðt  s3 Þ  ¼ Lecplg  þ Y4  Rce
C2 dt
X
3
IL1 ðt  si Þ  ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ  IL3 ðt  s3 Þ  IRc ðt  s3 Þ  IL4 ðtÞ
i¼2
dIL4 ðt  s4 Þ d 2 IL
¼ C2  ð  Rload þ L4  2 4 Þ
dt dt
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 443

We can rewrite our new set of system delay differential equations:

dIL4 dY6 d 2 IL4 dIL ðt  s4 Þ


Y6 ¼; ¼ 2 ; Y6 ðt  s4 Þ¼ 4
dt dt dt dt
!
dY2 1 X2
1 1 1
¼  IRs t  si þ  IC1 ðt  s2 Þ   Y1  Rs 
dt CC1  L13 i¼1
C C1  L 13 L 13 L13
1 dXs ðtÞ
 Y3  Rb2 þ 
L13 dt

dY5 1 1 X3
¼  ½IL1 ðt  s2 Þ  ILeplg  IL3  IRc  þ  ½IL1 ðt  si Þ
dt Cc2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg i¼2
IL4 ðtÞ Rce
 ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ  IL3 ðt  s3 Þ  IRc ðt  s3 Þ   Y4 
C2  Lecplg Lecplg

dIRs dIL dIL3 dIL dIR dIL dIL dIL


¼ Y1 ; 1 þ ¼ Y2 ; 3 ¼ Y3 ; ce ¼Y4 ; eplg  cplg ¼ Y5 ; 4 ¼ Y6
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt dt

We need to find our system equilibrium points (fixed points) based on the new
set of delay differential equations. It is done by setting dYdt2 ¼ 0; dYdt5 ¼ 0; dYdt6 ¼ 0

dIRs dIL dIL3 dIL dIR dIL dIL dIL


¼ 0; 1 þ ¼ 0; 3 ¼ 0; ce ¼0; eplg  cplg ¼ 0; 4 ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt dt

@ fixed points
P
2 P
2
lim IRs ðt  si Þ  IRs ðtÞ; lim IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IL1 ðtÞ; t  si ; t  s2
t!1 i¼1 t!1 i¼1

X
3 X
3
lim IC1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IC1 ðtÞ; lim IL1 ðt  si Þ ¼ IL1 ðtÞ; t  si ; lim ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ ¼ ILeplg ðtÞ
t!1 t!1 t!1
i¼2 i¼2
X
3 X
3
lim IL3 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ IL3 ðtÞ; t  s3 ; lim IRc ðt  s3 Þ ¼ IRc ðtÞ; lim IL1 ðt  si Þ ¼ IL1 ðtÞ; t  si
t!1 t!1 t!1
i¼2 i¼2
lim Y6 ðt  s4 Þ ¼ Y6 ðtÞ; t  s4
t!1
444 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

1 1 1 dXs ðtÞ
 I þ  I þ  ¼ 0;
CC1  L13 Rs CC1  L13 C1 L13 dt
   
1 1 ½IL1  ILeplg  IL3  IRc  IL4
ð þ Þ  ¼0
Cc2 C2 Lecplg C2  Lecplg
1
 ðI   ILeplg  IL3  IRc  IL4 Þ ¼ 0; Y1 ¼ 0;
C2  L4 L1
Y2 ¼ 0; Y3 ¼ 0; Y4 ¼ 0; Y5 ¼ 0; Y6 ¼ 0

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the Small Signal
(SS) amplifier with L matching networks
consists in adding to coordinate IRs ; IC1 ; IL1 ; IL3 ; ILeplg ; IRc ; IL4 ; Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Y5 ; Y6
arbitrarily small increments of exponentially form ½iRs ; iC1 ; iL1 ; iL3 ; iLeplg ; iRc ; iL4 ;
y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ; y5 ; y6   ekt and retaining the first order terms in IRs ; IC1 ; IL1 ; IL3 ; ILeplg ;
IRc ; IL4 ; Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Y5 ; Y6 [2, 3]. The system of homogenous equations leads to a
polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The polynomial character-
istic equations accept by set of the below circuit variables, circuit variables
derivative and circuit variables second order derivative with respect to time into
Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching networks equivalent circuit. Our Small
Signal (SS) amplifier with matching L networks equivalent circuit fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½iRs ; iC1 ; iL1 ; iL3 ; iLeplg ; iRc ;
iL4 ; y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ; y5 ; y6   ekt are: j = 0(first fixed point), j = 1(second fixed point),
j = 2(third fixed point), etc.,
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ; Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt
P 2

ðjÞ ðjÞ
X2
ðjÞ
kðt si Þ
kt kt
Y5 ðtÞ ¼ Y5 þ y5  e ; Y6 ðtÞ ¼ Y6 þ y6  e ; IRs ðt  si Þ ¼ IRs þ iRs  e i¼1

i¼1

ðjÞ ðjÞ
IC1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IC1 þ iC1  ekðts2 Þ ; IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekðts2 Þ ;
ðjÞ
ILeplg ðtÞ ¼ ILeplg þ iLeplg  ekt
P
3

ðjÞ ðjÞ
X
3
ðjÞ
kðt si Þ
kt kt
IL3 ðtÞ ¼ IL3 þ iL3  e ; IRc ðtÞ ¼ IRc þ iRc  e ; IL1 ðt  si Þ ¼ IL 1 þ iL1  e i¼2

i¼2
ðjÞ kðts3 Þ ðjÞ
ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ ¼ ILeplg þ iLeplg  e ; IL3 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ IL3 þ iL3  ekðts3 Þ ;
ðjÞ
IRc ðt  s3 Þ ¼ IRc þ iRc  ekðts3 Þ
IL4 ðtÞ
dIRs dIL dIL3
¼ iRs  k  ekt ; 1 þ ¼ ½iL1 þ iL1   k  ekt
dt dt dt
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 445

dIL3 dIR dIL dIL


¼ iL3  k  ekt ; ce ¼ iRce  k  ekt ; eplg  cplg ¼ ½iLeplg  iLcplg   k  ekt ;
dt dt dt dt
dIL4 ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ iL4  k  ekt ILeplg ¼ ILeplg þ iLeplg  ekt ; ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ ¼ ILeplg þ iLeplg  ekðts3 Þ
dt

dY2 1 X 2
1 1 1
¼  IRs ðt  si Þ þ  IC1 ðt  s2 Þ   Y1  Rs 
dt C C1  L13 i¼1
CC1  L13 L13 L13
1 dXs ðtÞ
 Y3  Rb2 þ 
L13 dt
P2

1 kðt si Þ 1
kt ðjÞ ðjÞ
y2  k  e ¼  ðIRs þ iRs  e i¼1 Þþ  ðI þ iC1  ekðts2 Þ Þ
CC1  L13 CC1  L13 C1
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 dXs ðtÞ
  ðY1 þ y1  ekt Þ  Rs   ðY3 þ y3  ekt Þ  Rb2 þ 
L13 L13 L13 dt

We consider input RF source Xs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; jnðtÞj\1 & A0 jnðtÞj


dXs ðtÞjA jnðtÞj
Then Xs ðtÞjA0 jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ  A0 ; dt
0
¼ dnðtÞ
dt ! e.

0  1
P
2
k t si
1 B ðjÞ C
y2  k  ekt ¼   @IRs þ iRs  e i¼1
A
CC1  L13

1   1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ  IC1 þ iC1  ekðts2 Þ   ðY1 þ y1  ekt Þ  Rs
CC1  L13 L13
1  ðjÞ 
  Y3 þ y3  ekt  Rb2
L13
 
P 2
k t si
1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ
y2  k  ekt ¼  I   iR  e i¼1
þ I
CC1  L13 Rs CC1  L13 s CC1  L13 C1
1
þ  iC1  ekðts2 Þ
CC1  L13
1 ðjÞ Rs Rb ðjÞ Rb
  Y1  Rs   y1  ekt  2  Y3  2  y3  ekt
L13 L13 L13 L13
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ Rb ðjÞ
y2  k  ekt ¼  I þ I   Y  Rs  2  Y3
CC1  L13 Rs CC1  L13 C1 L13 1 L13
 
P2
k t si
1
  iRs  e i¼1
CC1  L13
1 Rs Rb
þ  iC1  ekðts2 Þ   y1  ekt  2  y3  ekt
CC1  L13 L13 L13
446 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ R ðjÞ


@ fixed point  CC 1L13  IRs þ 1
CC1 L13  IC1  L113  Y1  Rs  Lb132  Y3 ¼ 0
1

P2

1 kðt si Þ 1 Rs
kt
y2  k  e ¼  iRs  e i¼1 þ  iC1  ekðts2 Þ   y1  ekt
CC1  L13 CC1  L13 L13
Rb
 2  y3  ekt
L13

Dividing two sides of the above by ekt term

P
2

1 k si 1 Rs Rb
y2  k   iRs  e i¼1 þ  iC1  eks2   y1  2  y3 ¼ 0
CC1  L13 CC1  L13 L13 L13

dY5 1 1 X3
¼  ½IL1 ðt  s2 Þ  ILeplg  IL3  IRc  þ  ½IL1 ðt  si Þ
dt Cc2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg i¼2
IL4 ðtÞ Rce
 ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ  IL3 ðt  s3 Þ  IRc ðt  s3 Þ   Y4 
C2  Lecplg Lecplg

1 h   
ðjÞ ðjÞ
y5  k  ekt ¼  IL1 þ iL1  ekðts2 Þ  ILep lg þ iLep lg  ekt
Cc2  Lecplg
   i
ðjÞ ðjÞ
 IL3 þ iL3  ekt  IRc þ iRc  ekt
0 P3 1
1 kðt si Þ  
ðjÞ A  ILðjÞ þ iLep lg  ekðts3 Þ
þ  ½@IL1 þ iL1  e i¼2
C2  Lecplg ep lg

 
ðjÞ
 IL3 þ iL3  ekðts3 Þ
 
ðjÞ
  IL4 þ iL4  ekt   R
ðjÞ ðjÞ
 IRc þ iRc  ekðts3 Þ    Y4 þ y4  ekt 
ce
C2  Lecplg Lecplg
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 447

 
kt 1 ðjÞ 1 kðts2 Þ
y5  k  e ¼ I þ  iL  e
Cc2  Lecplg L1 Cc2  Lecplg 1
 
1 ðjÞ 1
  ILeplg þ  iLeplg  ekt
Cc2  Lecplg Cc2  Lecplg
 
1 ðjÞ 1
  IL 3 þ  iL3  ekt
Cc2  Lecplg Cc2  Lecplg
 
1 ðjÞ 1 kt
 I þ  iR  e
Cc2  Lecplg Rc Cc2  Lecplg c
0 P3 1
1 1 kðt si Þ
ðjÞ
þ@ I þ  iL  e i¼2 A
C2  Lecplg L1 C2  Lecplg 1
 
1 ðjÞ 1
  ILeplg þ  iLeplg  ekðts3 Þ
C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg
 
1 ðjÞ 1 kðts3 Þ
 I þ  iL  e
C2  Lecplg L3 C2  Lecplg 3
 
1 ðjÞ 1
  IR c þ  iRc  ekðts3 Þ
C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg
ðjÞ  
IL 4 iL4  ekt ðjÞ Rce Rce
   Y4  þ y4   ekt
C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg Lecplg Lecplg

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ


y5  k  ekt ¼ f I  I  I
Cc2  Lecplg L1 Cc2  Lecplg Leplg Cc2  Lecplg L3
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
 I þ I
Cc2  Lecplg Rc C2  Lecplg L1
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
 I  I  I
C2  Lecplg Leplg C2  Lecplg L3 C2  Lecplg Rc
ðjÞ
IL 4 ðjÞ Rce 1
  Y4  gþ  iL  ekðts2 Þ
C2  Lecplg Lecplg Cc2  Lecplg 1
1 1
  iL  ekt   iL  ekt
Cc2  Lecplg eplg Cc2  Lecplg 3
P3

1 1 kðt si Þ
  iRc  ekt þ  iL1  e i¼2
Cc2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg
1 1
  iL  ekðts3 Þ   iL  ekðts3 Þ
C2  Lecplg eplg C2  Lecplg 3
1
  iR  ekðts3 Þ
C2  Lecplg c
iL4  ekt Rce
  y4   ekt
C2  Lecplg Lecplg
448 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

@ fixed point

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ


f I  I  I  I
Cc2  Lecplg L1 Cc2  Lecplg Leplg Cc2  Lecplg L3 Cc2  Lecplg Rc
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
þ  I L1   ILeplg   I L3  I
C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg Rc
ðjÞ
I L4 ðjÞ Rce
  Y4  g¼0
C2  Lecplg Lecplg

1 1
y5  k  ekt ¼  iL  ekðts2 Þ   iL  ekt
Cc2  Lecplg 1 Cc2  Lecplg eplg
1 1
  iL  ekt   iR  ekt
Cc2  Lecplg 3 Cc2  Lecplg c
P3

1 kðt si Þ 1
þ  i L1  e i¼2   iL  ekðts3 Þ
C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg eplg
1 1
  iL3  ekðts3 Þ   iR  ekðts3 Þ
C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg c
iL4  ekt Rce
  y4   ekt
C2  Lecplg Lecplg

Dividing two sides of the above by ekt term

1 1 1
y5  k ¼  iL  eks2   iL   iL
Cc2  Lecplg 1 Cc2  Lecplg eplg Cc2  Lecplg 3
P3

1 1 k si
  iRc þ  iL1  e i¼2
Cc2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg
1 1
  iLeplg  eks3   iL  eks3
C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg 3
1 i L4 Rce
  iRc  eks3   y4 
C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg Lecplg

1 1 1
 y5  k þ  iL  eks2   iL   iL
Cc2  Lecplg 1 Cc2  Lecplg eplg Cc2  Lecplg 3
P3

1 1 k si 1
  iR þ  iL  e i¼2   iL  eks3
Cc2  Lecplg c C2  Lecplg 1 C2  Lecplg eplg
1 1 iL4 Rce
  iL  eks3   iR  eks3   y4  ¼0
C2  Lecplg 3 C2  Lecplg c C2  Lecplg Lecplg
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 449

P3

1 k si 1
 y5  k þ  ðeks2 þ e i¼2 Þ  iL1   ð1 þ eks3 Þ  iLeplg
Cc2  Lecplg Cc2  Lecplg
1 1 i L4
  ð1 þ eks3 Þ  iL3   ð1 þ eks3 Þ  iRc 
C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg
Rce
 y4  ¼0
Lecplg

dY6 1 X3
1 1
¼  IL1 ðt  si Þ   ILeplg ðt  s3 Þ   IL ðt  s3 Þ
dt C2  L4 i¼2
C2  L4 C2  L4 3
1 1 1
  IRc ðt  s3 Þ   IL ðtÞ   Y6 ðt  s4 Þ  Rload
C2  L4 C2  L4 4 L4
P3

1 kðt si Þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
y6  k  ekt ¼  ðIL1 þ iL1  e i¼2 Þ  ðI þ iLeplg  ekðts3 Þ Þ
C2  L4 C2  L4 Leplg
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
  ðI þ iL3  ekðts3 Þ Þ   ðI þ iRc  ekðts3 Þ Þ
C2  L4 L3 C2  L4 Rc
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
  ðI þ iL4  ekt Þ   ðY6 þ y6  ekðts4 Þ Þ  Rload
C2  L4 L4 L4
P3

1 1 kðt si Þ 1
kt ðjÞ ðjÞ
y6  k  e ¼  I L1 þ  iL1  e i¼2  I
C2  L4 C2  L4 C2  L4 Leplg
1 1 ðjÞ 1
  iL  ekðts3 Þ  I   iL  ekðts3 Þ
C2  L4 eplg C2  L4 L3 C2  L4 3
1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ 1
  IRc   iRc  ekðts3 Þ   I L4   iL  ekt
C2  L4 C2  L4 C2  L4 C2  L4 4
Rload ðjÞ Rload
  Y6   y6  ekðts4 Þ
L4 L4

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
y6  k  ekt ¼ I  I  I  I
C2  L4 L1 C2  L4 Leplg C2  L4 L3 C2  L4 Rc

1 ðjÞ Rload ðjÞ
  I L4   Y6
C2  L4 L4
P3

1 kðt si Þ 1
þ  i L1  e i¼2   iL  ekðts3 Þ
C2  L4 C2  L4 eplg
1 1
  iL  ekðts3 Þ   iR  ekðts3 Þ
C2  L4 3 C2  L4 c
1 Rload
  iL4  ekt   y6  ekðts4 Þ
C2  L4 L4
450 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

@ fixed point

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ


I  I  I  I  I
C2  L4 L1 C2  L4 Leplg C2  L4 L3 C2  L4 Rc C2  L4 L4
Rload ðjÞ
  Y6 ¼ 0
L4
P3

1 kðt si Þ 1
kt
y6  k  e ¼  i L1  e i¼2   iL  ekðts3 Þ
C2  L4 C2  L4 eplg
1 1
  iL  ekðts3 Þ   iR  ekðts3 Þ
C2  L4 3 C2  L4 c
1 Rload
  iL4  ekt   y6  ekðts4 Þ
C2  L4 L4
P3

1 kðt si Þ 1
kt
 y6  k  e þ  i L1  e i¼2   iL  ekðts3 Þ
C2  L4 C2  L4 eplg
1 1
  iL3  ekðts3 Þ   iR  ekðts3 Þ
C2  L4 C2  L4 c
1 Rload
  iL  ekt   y6  ekðts4 Þ ¼ 0
C2  L4 4 L4

Dividing two sides of the above by ekt term

P3

1 k si 1
 y6  k þ  iL1  e i¼2   iL  eks3
C2  L4 C2  L4 eplg
1 1
  iL  eks3   iR  eks3
C2  L4 3 C2  L4 c
1 Rload
  iL   y6  eks4 ¼ 0
C2  L4 4 L4

dIRs dIL dIL3 dIL dIR


¼ Y1 ; 1 þ ¼ Y2 ; 3 ¼ Y3 ; ce ¼Y4 ;
dt dt dt dt dt
dILeplg dILcplg dIL4
 ¼ Y5 ; ¼ Y6
dt dt dt
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 451

dIRs ðjÞ
¼ Y1 ) iRs  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt )Y ðjÞ ¼0 iRs  k þ y1 ¼ 0
dt 1

dIL1 dIL3 ðjÞ


þ ¼ Y2 ) iL1  k  ekt þ iL3  k  ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt )Y ðjÞ ¼0
dt dt 2

 ðiL1 þ iL3 Þ  k þ y2 ¼ 0
dIL3 ðjÞ
¼ Y3 ) iL3  k  ekt ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt )Y ðjÞ ¼0 iL3  k þ y3 ¼ 0
dt 3

dIRce ðjÞ
¼Y4 ) iRce  k  ekt ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt )Y ðjÞ ¼0 iRce  k þ y4 ¼ 0
dt 4

dILeplg dILcplg ðjÞ


 ¼ Y5 ) iLeplg  k  ekt  iLcplg  k  ekt ¼ Y5 þ y5  ekt )Y ðjÞ ¼0
dt dt 5

 ðiLeplg  iLcplg Þ  k þ y5 ¼ 0
dIL4 ðjÞ
¼ Y6 ) iL4  k  ekt ¼ Y6 þ y6  ekt )Y ðjÞ ¼0 iL4  k þ y6 ¼ 0
dt 6

We can summery our results:

P
2

1 k si 1 Rs Rb
y2  k   iRs  e i¼1 þ  iC1  eks2   y1  2  y3 ¼ 0
CC1  L13 CC1  L13 L13 L13

P 3

1 k si 1
ks2
 y5  k þ  ðe þ e i¼2 Þ  iL1   ð1 þ eks3 Þ  iLeplg
Cc2  Lecplg Cc2  Lecplg
1
  ð1 þ eks3 Þ  iL3
C2  Lecplg
1 i L4 Rce
  ð1 þ eks3 Þ  iRc   y4  ¼0
C2  Lecplg C2  Lecplg Lecplg

P3

Rload ks4 1 k si 1


 ðk þ e Þ  y6 þ  iL1  e i¼2   iL  eks3
L4 C2  L4 C2  L4 eplg
1
  iL  eks3
C2  L4 3
1 1
  iR  eks3   iL ¼ 0
C2  L4 c C2  L4 4
452 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

 iRs  k þ y1 ¼ 0; ðiL1 þ iL3 Þ  k þ y2 ¼ 0; iL3  k þ y3 ¼ 0; iRce  k þ y4 ¼ 0


 ðiLeplg  iLcplg Þ  k þ y5 ¼ 0; iL4  k þ y6 ¼ 0; iL3  k þ y3 ¼ 0 ) y3 ¼ iL3  k
 ðiL1 þ iL3 Þ  k þ y2 ¼ 0 ) iL1  k  iL3  k þ y2 ¼ 0 ) iL1  k  y3 þ y2 ¼ 0

The small increments of our Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching
networks can be divided to two matrixes. The first matrix is (8x8) and the second
matrix is (6x8).
0 1
y2
B C 0 1
B iRs C i C1
B C B C
0 1 B C
B y5 C 0 1 B y1 C
!11 . . . !18 B C N11 ... N16 B C
B C
B .. .. .. C B i C
B L1 C þ B .. .. .. C B y3 C
@ . . . A  Bi C @ . . . A  B C ¼ 0; !11
B L3 C B iLeplg C
!81    !88 B C N81  N86 B C
B iL4 C B i C
B C @ Rc A
B y C
@ 6A y4
iRce
P2

1 k si
¼ k; !12 ¼   e i¼1
CC1  L13

!13 ¼ !14 ¼ !15 ¼ !16 ¼ !17 ¼ !18 ¼ 0; !21 ¼ 0; !22 ¼ k; !23 ¼ !24 ¼ !25
¼ !26 ¼ !27 ¼ !28 ¼ 0

P
3

1 k si
ks2
!31 ¼ !32 ¼ 0; !33 ¼ k; !34 ¼  ðe þ e i¼2 Þ;
Cc2  Lecplg
1
!35 ¼   ð1 þ eks3 Þ
C2  Lecplg
1
!36 ¼ ; !37 ¼ !38 ¼ 0; !41 ¼ 1; !42 ¼ !43 ¼ 0;
C2  Lecplg
!44 ¼ k; !45 ¼ !46 ¼ !47 ¼ !48 ¼ 0
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 453

!51 ¼ !52 ¼ !53 ¼ !54 ¼ 0; !55 ¼ k; !56 ¼ !57 ¼ !58 ¼ 0;


!61 ¼ !62 ¼ !63 ¼ !64 ¼ !65 ¼ 0
P3

1 k si
!66 ¼ k; !67 ¼ 1; !68 ¼ 0; !71 ¼ !72 ¼ !73 ¼ 0; !74 ¼  e i¼2 ;
C2  L4
1
!75 ¼   eks3
C2  L4
1 Rload ks4
!76 ¼ ; !77 ¼ ðk þ e Þ; !78 ¼ 0; !81 ¼ . . . ¼ !87 ¼ 0;
C2  L4 L4
!88 ¼ k
1 Rs Rb
N11 ¼  eks2 ; N12 ¼  ; N13 ¼  2 ; N14 ¼ N15 ¼ N16 ¼ 0
CC1  L13 L13 L13
N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ 1; N23 ¼ N24 ¼ N25 ¼ N26 ¼ 0; N31 ¼ N32 ¼ N33 ¼ 0;
1
N34 ¼   ð1 þ eks3 Þ
Cc2  Lecplg
1 Rce
N35 ¼   ð1 þ eks3 Þ; N36 ¼  ; N41 ¼ N42 ¼ 0;
C2  Lecplg Lecplg
N43 ¼ 1; N44 ¼ N45 ¼ N46 ¼ 0
N51 ¼ N52 ¼ 0; N53 ¼ 1; N54 ¼ N55 ¼ N56 ¼ 0; N61 ¼ . . . ¼ N66 ¼ 0;
N71 ¼ N72 ¼ N73 ¼ 0
1 1
N74 ¼   eks3 ; N75 ¼   eks3 ; N76 ¼ 0; N81 ¼ . . . ¼ N85 ¼ 0;
C2  L4 C2  L4
N86 ¼ 1

0 1
iC1
B C
0 1 B y1 C
N11 . . . N16 B C
B C
B .. .. .. C B y3 C
We consider in our analysis the following: @ . . . AB C!e
B iLeplg C
N61    N66 B C
B i C
@ Rc A
y4
0 1
N11 . . . N16
B . .. .. C
Since N61 ¼ . . . ¼ N66 ¼ 0 then det@ .. . . A¼0
N61    N66
We consider in our stability analysis small increments Jacobian of our Small
Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching networks, first matrix is (8  8) [5, 6].
454 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

0 1
y2
B C
B iRs C
B C
0 1 B
B y5 CC
!11 . . . !18 B C
B .. .. .. C B
B
i L1 C
C ¼ 0; A  k  I
@ . . . AB i L3 C
B C
!81    !88 B C
B i L4 C
B C
B y6 C
@ A
iRce
0 1
!11 . . . !18
B .. .. .. C
¼@ . . . A; detjA  k  Ij ¼ 0
!81    !88

1 Rload ks4
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; s4 Þ ¼ k8 þ k6  þ k7  e ; s4 ¼ s
C2  L4 L4

1 Rload ks
Dðk; sÞ ¼ k8 þ k6  þ k7  e
C2  L4 L4

We need to get the characteristic equation for stability analysis. We study the
occurrence of any possible stability switching resulting from the increase of value
of the time delay s parameter then Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks .
Pn
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ  kk . The expression for
k¼0
P
m
Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  k . Pn¼8 ðkÞ ¼ k8 þ k6  C21L4 ; Qm¼7 ðkÞ¼k7  RLload
k
4
k¼0

1
n ¼ 8; m ¼ 7; n [ m; p0 ðsÞ ¼ . . . ¼ p5 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p6 ðsÞ ¼ ; p7 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p8 ðsÞ
C2  L4
¼1

q0 ðsÞ ¼ . . . ¼ q6 ðsÞ; q7 ðsÞ ¼ RLload 4


. The homogeneous system for IRs ; IC1 ; IL1 ; IL3 ;
ILeplg ; IRc ; IL4 ; Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Y5 ; Y6 leads to a characteristic equation for the eigen-
P8
value k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0; Pðk; sÞ ¼ aj  k j Qðk; sÞ ¼
j¼0
P
7
cj  k j and the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on qi ; qk and
j¼0
delay s. qi ; qk are any Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching network
parameters, other parameters kept as a constant. Unless strictly necessary, the
designation of variation arguments (qi ; qk ) will subsequently be omitted from P, Q,
aj and cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 455

arguments. Furthermore P(k), Q(k) are analytic functions of k, for which the fol-
lowing requirements of the analysis (Kuang and Cong 2005; Kuang 1993) can also
be verified in the present case.
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1; Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 . It has a finite number of zeros; indeed, this is
a polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable with
respect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ cannot have common imaginary roots.
That is for any real number x; Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0.

1 Rload
Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x8  x6  ; Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ i  x7 
C2  L4 L4
1 R load
Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x8  x6   i  x7  6¼ 0
C2  L4 L4
1 1 R2
jPði  xÞj2 ¼ x16 þ x12  2 2  2  x14  ; jQði  xÞj2 ¼ x14  load
C2  L4 C2  L4 L24
2
1 1 14 Rload
FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ x16 þ x12   2  x 14
  x 
C22  L24 C2  L4 L24
1 R2 1
FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ x16  ½2  þ load   x14 þ x12  2 2
C2  L4 L24 C2  L4

We define the following parameters for simplicity:

1 R2 1
U16 ¼ 1; U14 ¼ ½2  þ load ; U12 ¼ 2 2 ; U2k ¼ 0 8 k ¼ 0; . . .; 5
C2  L4 L42 C2  L4

P
8
Hence FðxÞ ¼ 0 implies U2k  x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the polynomial. Furthermore

1
PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x8  x6  ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ 0; QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ 0;
C2  L4
Rload
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x7 
L4
PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2
456 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …


½x8  x6  C21L4   x7  RLload 1 1 L4
sin hðsÞ ¼ 4
¼ x   ; cos hðsÞ ¼ 0
x14 
R2load x C2  L4 Rload
L24

We can use different parameters terminology from our last characteristics


parameters definition: k ! j; pk ðsÞ ! aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 8; m ¼ 7; n [ m.
Additionally
P8 P
7
Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! QðkÞ; PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j
j¼0 j¼0

1 Rload
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ k8 þ k6  ; QðkÞ ¼ k7 
C2  L4 L4

n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m; aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable function


of s. In the following “—” denotes complex and conjugate. PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic
functions in k and differentiable in s. The coefficients aj ; cj as follow
faj ðC2 ; L4 ; Rload;... Þ&cj ðC2 ; L4 ; Rload;... Þg 2 R depend on Small Signal (SS) amplifier
with L matching network system’s C2, L 4, Rload… values.
a0 ¼ . . . ¼ a5 ¼ 0; a6 ¼ C21L4
a7 ¼ 0; a8 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ c1 ¼ . . . ¼ c6 ¼ 0; c7 ¼ RLload
4
. Unless strictly necessary, the
designation of the variation arguments (C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... ) will subsequently be
omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous and differential
functions of their arguments. Furthermore P(k), Q(k) are analytic function of s for
which the following requirements of the analysis (Kuang 1993) can also be verified
in the present case (Beretta and Kuang 2002) [5, 6].
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0 that is P and Q have no
common imaginary roots. This condition can verified numerically in the entire
C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... domain of interest.
(b) j QðkÞ
PðkÞ j is bounded for jkj ! 1; Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from ∞. Indeed
Rload
k7 
in the limit j QðkÞ
PðkÞ j ¼ j k8 þ k6 
L4
1 j.
C2 L4
R2load
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ x16  ½2  C21L4 þ L24
  x14 þ x12  C21L2
2 4
It has at most a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x
(degree in x16).
(d) Each positive root x C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differ-
entiable with respect to C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... this condition can only be assessed
numerically.

In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real we have Pði  xÞ ¼


Pði  xÞ;Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ. k ¼ i  x; x [ 0 may be on eigenvalue of charac-
teristic equation. The analysis consists in identifying the roots of characteristic
equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k plane, whereby increasing
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 457

the parameters C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... Re k may at the crossing, change its sign from (−) to
 
(+), that is, from a stable focus E IRs ; IC 1 ; IL1 ; IL3 ; . . . to an unstable one, or vice
versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial
derivatives with respect to C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... and Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L
matching networks parameters.
   
@Rek @Rek
K1 ðC2 Þ ¼ ; L4 ; Rload ; . . . ¼ const; K1 ðL4 Þ ¼ ;
@C2 k¼ix @L4 k¼ix
C2 ; Rload ; . . . ¼ const
  X
@Rek 8
K1 ðRload Þ ¼ ; C2 ; L4 ; . . . ¼ const: Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 ) U2k  x2k ¼ 0:
@Rload k¼ix k¼0

When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ; QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ and inserting
k ¼ i  x; x 2 R into Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching networks sys-
tem’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin x  s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2

PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos x  s ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

Where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above sin x  s and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and
adding the sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note that FðxÞ can be dependent of s. If s 62 I (assume I
R þ 0 is the set where
xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for s 62 I, xðsÞ is not defined then for all s in I,
xðsÞ satisfies that Fðx; sÞ) then there are no positive xðsÞ solutions for Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0
and we cannot have stability switches. For any s 2 I, where xðsÞ is a positive
solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, we can define the angle hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ
þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions
I ! R; Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and differentiable
in s. In the following, the subscripts k; x; C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... indicate the corresponding
458 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on K(x), remember in kðC2 ; L4 ; Rload;... Þ


and xðC2 ; L4 ; Rload;... Þ, and keeping all parameters except one (x) and s. The
derivation closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiation Small Signal
(SS) amplifier with L matching networks characteristic equation: PðkÞ þ QðkÞ 
eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and inverting the derivative, for
convenience one calculates:
Remark: x ¼ L4 ; Rload ; C2 ; . . .etc

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ

where Pk ¼ @P
@k …etc., substituting k ¼ i  x and bearing Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ and
Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ. Then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ;i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ and
that on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtain:

@k i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þ1 jk¼ix ¼
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ;


Q ¼ QR þ i  QI

Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ;


P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I

When (x) can be any Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching network
parameters C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... and any time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we
dropped the arguments ði  x; xÞ, and where

1 Rload
PR ¼ x8  x6  ; PI ¼ 0; QR ¼ 0; QI ¼ x7  ;
C2  L4 L4
1
PRx ¼ 8  x7  6  x5 
C2  L4
Rload
PIx ¼ 0; QRx ¼ 0; QIx ¼ 7  x6  ; PRs ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0; QRs ¼ 0; QIs ¼ 0
L4
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ;
1 2
P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I ¼ x12  ½x2  
C2  L4
Fx
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ; xx ¼ 
Fx

We define U and V: U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ


4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 459

V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ. First we choose our specific
parameter as time delay s. PRx  PR ¼ ½8  x7  6  x5  C21L4   ½x8  x6  C21L4 

1 1
PRx  PR ¼ 2  x11  ½4  x4  7  x2  þ3  ; QRx  QR ¼ 0; PIx  PI ¼ 0
C2  L4 ðC2  L4 Þ2
 2
Rload
QIx  QI ¼ 7  x13  ; PR  PIx ¼ 0; PI  PRx ¼ 0; QR  QIx ¼ 0; QI  QRx ¼ 0
L4
( " #  )
1 1 Rload 2
Fs ¼ 0; Fx ¼ 2  2  x  4  x  7  x 
11 4 2
þ3 7x  13
C2  L 4 ðC2  L4 Þ2 L4
(  2 ! )
2 Rload 6
Fx ¼ 2  x11  8  x4  7  x2  þ þ ; xs ¼ 0; V ¼ 0; U ¼ 0
C2  L4 L4 ðC2  L4 Þ2
@x @x Fs @Rek
Fx  þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) xs ¼ ¼  ; K1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s @s Fx @s k¼ix
( )   
2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx @Rek
K1 ðsÞ ¼ Re ; signfK 1
ðsÞg ¼ sign
Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2  @s k¼ix
( )
@x
@x U  @s þ V
signfK1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  sign s  þxþ
@s jPj2
" ( )#
1 2 Rload 2 6
signfK ðsÞg ¼ sign 2  x  8  x  7  x  ð
11 4 2
þ½  Þþ  signfxg
C 2  L4 L4 ðC2  L4 Þ2

Remark: Since P and Q are independent on s parameter, signfK1 ðsÞg function


Is independent on s parameter and it is only a function of x.
We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcation) of
Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching networks system, about the equilib-
rium point E  ðIRs ; IC 1 ; IL1 ; IL3 ; . . .Þ as a result of a variation of delay parameter s or
any other system parameter (C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... ). The analysis consists in identifying the
roots of our system characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the
complex k-plane whereby increasing the delay parameter s or other system’s
parameter, Re k may at the crossing, change its sign from—to +, that is, from a
stable focus E(*) to an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature may be further
assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with respect to s or other
system parameter C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... .
It is a reader exercise to find the expressions for signfK1 ðC2 Þg;
signfK1 ðL4 Þg; . . .
And discuss stability switching for different value of system parameter.
Remark: Our system Jacobian is related to part of small increments, so our
stability analysis is not fully implemented to the actual behavior of our system. Our
stability switching analysis is under these assumptions.
460 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching


Under Delayed Micro Strip in Time

The function of the bias T is to simultaneously allow a DC bias voltage and an RF


test signal to be applied to the port of a transistor during measurement. In S—
parameter measurement system, the DC bias is applied at the port labeled “DC”,
and the RF test signal from the Vector Network Analyzer (VNA)) is applied to the
port labeled “RF”. At the RF + DC port, both RF and DC voltages are applied to
the device. Basic Bias T schematics: capacitor transfers only RF signal and block
DC. Inductor transfers DC signal and block RF [91–93] (Fig. 4.11)..
A bias T is a three ports network designed to provide power to remote devices,
such as amplifiers, over the same coaxial cable that RF signals are conveyed.
Commercially available bias Ts are available in both “connectorized” and surface
mount versions. These units are typically expensive and, although designed to be
wideband, often suffer in performance at frequencies below 50 MHz. It is con-
sisting of one inductor and one capacitor the bias T circuit is simple, but particular
consideration must be given to component selection. The basic topology and means
of operation, of a bias T network is described in the below figure (Fig. 4.12).
The shunt capacitor (C2) on the DC port should not be considered optional. It
increases isolation between the RF ports and the DC supply connection by routing
any remaining RF leakage on the supply side of the inductor to ground. The circuit
is evaluated both as a single unit and in the intended configuration with two bias Ts
connected together and transferring power. Bias T design considerations: Finding a

Fig. 4.11 Bias-T three ports schematic


4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 461

Fig. 4.12 Basic topology of


Bias-T network

DC/RF isolation inductor is the main challenge. The inductor must provide high
reactance across the bands of interest (XL ! ∞; ZL = XL) and it must carry the
required DC current. Inductor’s Q must be high to minimize inductor power dis-
sipation due to the RF signal
ðQ ! 1 ) PL ðaverageÞ ! e ) R ! eÞ. The real component of an inductor
has loss due to the resistive component. The stored energy in the inductor is marked
as EL. The average power dissipated in an inductor is marked as Pavg.
We analyze the stability of Bias T circuit which feed coax cable. For Bias T’s
microstrip lines circuit connections, we represent microstrip as a delay lines in time.
We neglect the voltage on delay lines Vsi ! e then Vsi ! e 8 i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; 5
(Fig. 4.13).
The delay is in the current that flows through microstrip represented delay line
IðtÞ ! Iðt  si Þ (Fig. 4.14).
The purpose of the inductor L1 is to prevent the RF signal from entering DC
path, and the purpose of the capacitor C1 is to keep the DC signal from entering the
RF path. The inductor and capacitor should be designed such that the upper cut-off
frequency of the low pass DC path is lower than the lower cut-off frequency of the
high pass RF path. We define Rload as the total resistance seen at the RF + DC port
(purely resistive). The equivalent circuit for the proposed system is as follow
(Fig. 4.15):
Terminology: Tau1 $ s1 ; Tau2 $ s2 ; Tau3 $ s3 ;Tau4 $ s4 ; Tau5 $ s5

Fig. 4.13 Bias-T microstrip delay line in time


462 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Fig. 4.14 Full Bias-T circuit implementation with delay lines

Fig. 4.15 Full Bias-T circuit implementation with delay lines and nodes index
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 463

Vs1 ! e ) A2 ¼ A21 ¼ A22 ; Vs2 ! e ) A3 ¼ A31 ¼ A32


fVs3 ! eg&fVs4 ! eg&fVs5 ! eg ) A5 ¼ A51 ¼ A52 ¼ A53 ¼ A54
Vs ðtÞ  VA2
VA1 ¼Vs ðtÞ; IRs ¼ ; IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IRs ðt  s1 Þ;
Rs
KCL @ A31 ) IC1 ðt  s2 Þ þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IRload ðtÞ

KCL @ A52 ) IRb ðt  s5 Þ ¼ I52a ðtÞ þ I52b ðtÞ; IC2 ¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ; IR1 ðtÞ
¼ I52b ðt  s3 Þ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IR1 ðtÞ

d d
IC1 ¼ C1  ðVA22  VA31 Þ; VA2 ¼ VA22 ; VA3 ¼ VA31 ; IC1 ¼ C1  ðVA2  VA3 Þ
dt dt
dVA52 dVA5 Vb VA54
IC2 ¼ C2  dt , since A5 ¼ A51 ¼ A52 , IC2 ¼ C2  dt ; IRb ¼ Rb and
Vb VA5 VA51 VA4 VA5 VA4
since A5 ¼ A54 ) IRb ¼ Rb ; IR1 ¼ R1 Since A5 ¼ A51 ) IR 1 ¼
dIL1
R1 VL1 ¼ L1  dt ; VL1 ¼ VA4  VA31 , since VA3 ¼ VA31 ; VL1 ¼ VA4  VA3 ;
dIL1
VA4  VA3 ¼ L1  dt

VA32 VA3
VA3 ¼ VA31 ¼ VA32 ) IRload ¼ ¼
Rload Rload

Remark: we consider in our analysis VA52 [ VA31 then the current flow is from
node A5-2 to node A3-1 otherwise ðVA52 \VA31 Þ the current flow is from node A3-1
to node A5-2.

Vs ðtÞ  VA2
IR s ¼ ) Vs ðtÞ  VA2 ¼ IRs  Rs ) VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs
Rs
IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IRs ðt  s1 Þ; IC1 ðt  s2 Þ þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ
¼ IRload ðtÞ; IRs ðt  s1  s2 Þ þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IRload ðtÞ
dVA5 dVA5
IC2 ¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ; IC2 ¼ C2  ; I52a ðt  s4 Þ ¼ C2  ) VA5
Z dt dt
1
¼  I52a ðt  s4 Þ  dt
C2
Vb  VA5
IRb ¼ ) Vb  VA5 ¼ IRb  Rb ) VA5 ¼ Vb  IRb  Rb ; IR1
Rb
VA  VA4
¼ 5 ) VA5  VA4 ¼ IR1  R1
R1
464 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

VA3 X 2
IRload ¼ ) VA3 ¼ IRload  Rload ; VA3 ¼ Rload  ½IRs ðt  si Þ þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ
Rload i¼1
Z
d 1
IC1 ¼ C1  ðVA2  VA3 Þ ) VA2  VA3 ¼  IC1  dt; VA2  VA3
dt C1
Z
1
¼  IRs ðt  s1 Þ  dtIRb ðt  s5 Þ ¼ I52a ðtÞ þ I52b ðtÞ ) I52b ðtÞ
C1
¼ IRb ðt  s5 Þ  I52a ðtÞ; I52b ðt  s3 Þ ¼ IRb ðt  s5  s3 Þ  I52a ðt  s3 ÞIR1
VA  VA4
¼ 5 ) VA5  VA4 ¼ IR1  R1 ; VA5  VA4 ¼ IR1  R1 ;
R1
IR1 ðtÞ ¼ I52b ðt  s3 Þ; IR1 ðtÞ ¼ I52b ðt  s3 Þ
¼ IRb ðt  s5  s3 Þ  I52a ðt  s3 Þ;
VA5  VA4 ¼ ½IRb ðt  s5  s3 Þ  I52a ðt  s3 Þ  R1
We can summery our intermediate equations:
Z
1
VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs ;VA5 ¼  I52a ðt  s4 Þ  dt; VA5 ¼ Vb  IRb  Rb
C2
" #
X2
VA5  VA4 ¼ IR1  R1 ¼ I52b ðt  s3 Þ  R1 ; VA3 ¼ Rload  IRs ðt  si Þ þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ
i¼1
Z
1
VA2  VA3 ¼  IRs ðt  s1 Þ  dt; VA5  VA4 ¼ ½IRb ðt  s5  s3 Þ  I52a ðt  s3 Þ  R1
C1
2 0 1 3
6 B X
5 C 7
VA5  VA4 ¼ 6 B
4IRb @t  si C 7
A  I52a ðt  s3 Þ5  R1
i¼3
i6¼4
Z Z
1 1
VA5 ¼  I52a ðt  s4 Þ  dt; VA5 ¼ Vb  IRb  Rb )  I52a ðt  s4 Þ  dt ¼ Vb  IRb  Rb
C C2
 2Z 
d 1 d 1 dVb dIRb dVb
 I52a ðt  s4 Þ  dt ¼ fVb  IRb  Rb g )  I52a ðt  s4 Þ ¼   Rb ; ¼0
dt C2 dt C2 dt dt dt
1 dIR dIRb 1
 I52a ðt  s4 Þ ¼  b  Rb ) ¼  I52a ðt  s4 Þ
C2 dt dt C2  Rb

Z
1
Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  VA3 ¼  IRs ðt  s1 Þ  dt ) VA2
C1
X
2 Z
1
 Rload  ½IRs ðt  si Þ þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼  IRs ðt  s1 Þ  dt
i¼1
C1
X
2 Z
1
Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  Rload  ½IRs ðt  si Þ þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ¼  IRs ðt  s1 Þ  dt
i¼1
C1
X2 Z
d d 1
fVs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  Rload  ½IRs ðt  si Þ þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þg ¼ f  IRs ðt  s1 Þ  dtg
dt i¼1
dt C1
P
2
dIRs ðt  si Þ
dVs ðtÞ dIRs i¼1 dIL1 ðt  s2 Þ IR ðt  s1 Þ
  Rs  Rload  ½ þ ¼ s
dt dt dt dt C1
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 465

2 0 1 3
6 B X
5 C 7 dIL1
VA4 ¼ VA5  6I
4 @R b
Bt  si C 7
A  I52a ðt  s3 Þ5  R1 ; VA4 ¼ VA3 þ L1  dt
i¼3
i6¼4
" ! !#
dIL1 X5
VA3 þ L1  ¼ VA5  IRb t  si  I52a ðt  s3  R1
dt i¼3
i6¼4
" ! # Z
X
2
dIL 1
Rload  IRs t  si þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ þ L1  1 ¼  I52a ðt  s4 Þ  dt
i¼1
dt C2
" !#
X
5
 IRb t  si Þ  I52a ðt  s3  R1
i¼3
i6¼4
Z " ! #
1 X
2
 I52a ðt  s4 Þ  dt ¼ Rload  IRs t  si þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ
C2 i¼1
" !#
dIL1 X5
þ L1  þ IR b t  si Þ  I52a ðt  s3  R1
dt i¼3
i6¼4

 Z  " ! #
d 1 d X2
 I52a ðt  s4 Þ  dt ¼ fRload  IRs t  si þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ
dt C2 dt i¼1

dIL1 X5
þ L1  þ ½IRb ðt  si Þ  I52a ðt  s3 Þ  R1 g
dt i¼3
i6¼4

P
2
dIRs ðt  si Þ
I52a ðt  s4 Þ i¼1 dIL1 ðt  s2 Þ d 2 IL
¼ Rload  þ Rload  þ L1  2 1
C2 dt dt dt
P
5
dIRb ðt  si Þ
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt  s3 Þ
þ  R1   R1
dt dt
P2
dIRs ðt  si Þ
2
d IL I52a ðt  s4 Þ i¼1 dIL ðt  s2 Þ
L1  2 1 ¼  Rload   Rload  1
dt C2 dt dt
P5
dIRb ðt  si Þ
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt  s3 Þ
  R1 þ  R1
dt dt
466 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

dIRb
We can summery our equations as follow: dt ¼  C21Rb  I52a ðt  s4 Þ

P
2
dIRs ðt  si Þ
dVs ðtÞ dIRs i¼1 dIL1 ðt  s2 Þ IR ðt  s1 Þ
  Rs  Rload  ½ þ ¼ s
dt dt dt dt C1
P
2
dIRs ðt  si Þ
d IL2
I52a ðt  s4 Þ i¼1 dIL1 ðt  s2 Þ
L1  2 1 ¼  Rload   Rload 
dt C2 dt dt
P5
dIRb ðt  si Þ
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt  s3 Þ
  R1 þ  R1
dt dt

We can merge two differential equations:


2   3
P2
dIRs t  si
6 dIL1 ðt  s2 Þ7
Rload 6 i¼1
þ 7 ¼ dVs ðtÞ  dIRs  Rs  IRs ðt  s1 Þ
4 dt dt 5 dt dt C1

2   3
P2
dIRs t  si
d 2 IL1 I52a ðt  s4 Þ 6 dIL1 ðt  s2 Þ7
L1  ¼  Rload 6
4
i¼1
þ 7
5
dt2 C2 dt dt
0 1
B P
5
C
dIRb @t  si A
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt  s3 Þ
  R1 þ  R1
dt dt


d 2 IL1 I52a ðt  s4 Þ dVs ðtÞ dIRs IRs ðt  s1 Þ
L1  ¼    R s 
dt2 C2 dt dt C1
0 1
B P
5
C
dIRb @t  si A
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt  s3 Þ
  R1 þ  R1
dt dt
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 467

We can summery our system two differential equations:

dIRb 1
¼  I52a ðt  s4 Þ
dt C2  Rb

d 2 IL I52a ðt  s4 Þ dVs ðtÞ dIRs IR ðt  s1 Þ
L1  2 1 ¼    Rs  s
dt C2 dt dt C1
0 1
P 5
dIRb @t  si A
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt  s3 Þ
  R1 þ  R1
dt dt
dIRb d 2 IL1
Some definitions for new variables: dt ¼  C21Rb  I52a ðt  s4 Þ; dYdt1 ¼ dt2 ;
dIL1
dt ¼ Y1

dY1 I52a ðt  s4 Þ dVs ðtÞ dIRs IRs ðt  s1 Þ
L1  ¼    Rs 
dt C2 dt dt C1
0 1
B P
5
C
dIRb @t  si A
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt  s3 Þ
  R1 þ  R1
dt dt
P
5
dIRb ðt si Þ
i¼3
dIL1 i6¼4 ðts3 Þ
At fixed point: dt ¼ 0; dYdt1 ¼ 0; dIdtRs ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dI52adt ¼0

X
5
lim I52a ðt  s4 Þ ¼ I52a ðtÞ; lim IRs ðt  s1 Þ ¼ IRs ðtÞ; lim IRb ðt  si Þ ¼ IRb ðtÞ
t!1 t!1 t!1
i¼3
i6¼4

X
5
lim I52a ðt  s3 Þ ¼ I52a ðtÞ; t [ [ s4 ; t [ [ s1 ; t [ [ si ; t [ [ s3
t!1
i¼3
i6¼4

j is the Index of system fixed points, first fixed point j = 0, second fixed point j = 1,
third fixed point j = 2, etc.,
468 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

dIRb 1 ðjÞ dIL ðjÞ


¼0)  I52a ðt  s4 Þ ¼ 0 ) I52a ¼ 0; 1 ¼ 0 ) Y1 ¼ 0
dt C2  Rb dt
" ðjÞ
#
ðjÞ
I52a dVs ðtÞ IRs ðjÞ ðjÞ dVs ðtÞ dIRs dI52a
  ¼ 0 ) I52a þ IRs ¼  C1 ; Y2 ¼ ; Y3 ¼
C2 dt C1 dt dt dt
dIRs ðjÞ dI52a ðjÞ
¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) Y3 ¼ 0
dt dt

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium
points of the Bias-T circuit which feed coax cable consists in adding to
coordinate Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3; I52a ; IRs arbitrarily small increments of exponentially form
½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; i52a ; iRs   ekt and retaining the first order terms in Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3; I52a ; IRs . The
system of homogenous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in
the eigenvalues. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set of the below
circuit variables, circuit variables derivative and circuit variables second order
derivative with respect to time into Bias-T circuit which feed coax cable equivalent
circuit. Our Bias-T circuit which feed coax cable equivalent circuit fixed values
with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; i52a ; iRs   ekt are:
j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,

ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt ; Y1 ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; I52a
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ I52a þ i52a  ekt ; IRs ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekt ; IRb ¼ IRb þ iRb  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I52a ðt  s4 Þ ¼ I52a þ i52a  ekðts4 Þ ; IRs ðt  s1 Þ ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekðts1 Þ ;
X
5
ðjÞ
X
5
IRb ðt  si Þ ¼ IRb þ iRb  exp½k  ðt  si Þ
i¼3 i¼3
i6¼4 i6¼4
dIL1 dY1 dI52a
¼ iL1  k  ekt ; ¼ y1  k  ekt ;
dt dt dt
kt dIRs kt dIRb
¼ i52a  k  e ; ¼ iRs  k  e ; ¼ iRb  k  ekt
dt dt
dI52a ðt  s4 Þ dIR ðt  s1 Þ
¼ i52a  k  ekt  eks4 ; s
dt dt !
P 5
dIRb t  si
i¼3
i6¼4
¼ iRs  k  ekt  eks1 ;
dt
X
5
¼ iRb  k  ekt  exp½k  ðt  si Þ
i¼3
i6¼4
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 469

ðjÞ dI52a ðt  s3 Þ
I52a ðt  s3 Þ ¼ I52a þ i52a  ekðts3 Þ ;
dt
kt ks3 ðjÞ
¼ i52a  k  e  e ; Y2 ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt
!
P 5
dIRb t  si
i¼3
i6¼4 dIRb X 5
¼  exp½k  ðt  si Þ
dt dt i¼3
i6¼4

1 X5
dI52a ðt  s3 Þ dI52a ks3
¼  I52a ðt  s4 Þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ; ¼ e
C2  Rb i¼3
dt dt
i6¼4

For k < 0, t > 0, the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 is
unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for k < 0, t > 0
otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the eigenvalue
parameter which is established if the fixed point is stable or unstable; additionally,
his absolute value |k| established the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point [5, 6].
dIRb
We can rewrite our system differential equations: dt ¼  C21Rb  I52a ðt  s4 Þ;
dIL1
dt ¼ Y1

dY1 I52a ðt  s4 Þ dVs ðtÞ dIRs IR ðt  s1 Þ 1


L1  ¼  þ  Rs þ s þ  I52a ðt  s4 Þ
dt C2 dt dt C1 C2  Rb
X5
dI52a ks3
 exp½k  ðt  si Þ  R1 þ e  R1
i¼3
dt
i6¼4

2 3
dY1 1 6 R1 X5 7
L1  ¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ  6
41þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ7
5
dt C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4

dVs ðtÞ dIRs IR ðt  s1 Þ dI52a ks3


 þ  Rs þ s þ e  R1
dt dt C1 dt
dY1 1 R1 X5
¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ   ½1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ
dt L1  C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
1 dVs ðtÞ dIRs Rs IR ðt  s1 Þ dI52a ks3 R1
  þ  þ s þ e 
L1 dt dt L1 C1  L1 dt L1
470 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

We define two new variables: Y2 ¼ dIdtRs ; Y3 ¼ dIdt52a

dY1 1 R1 X5
¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ   ½1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ þ Y2
dt L1  C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðt  s1 Þ R1 1 dVs ðtÞ
 þ s þ Y3  eks3   
L1 C1  L1 L1 L1 dt

Expression for differential equation: dY2


dt ¼ . . .. . .:
" ! #
X
2
VA3 ¼ Rload  IRs t  si þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ ; VA2  VA3
i¼1
Z
1
¼  IC1  dt; IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IRs ðt  s1 Þ
C1
Z X
2
1
VA2 ¼  IRs ðt  s1 Þ  dt þ Rload  ½IRs ðt  si Þ þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ;
C1 i¼1
Vs ðtÞ  VA2 1 1
IRs ¼ ¼  Vs ðtÞ   VA2
Rs Rs Rs
( Z " ! #)
1 1 1 X2
IRs ¼  Vs ðtÞ    IRs ðt  s1 Þ  dt þ Rload  IRs t  si þ IL1 ðt  s2 Þ
Rs Rs C1 i¼1

8 2 39
> P
2
>
> dIRs ðt  si Þ >
dIRs 1 dVs ðtÞ 1 < 1 6 dIL1 ðt  s2 Þ7=
¼     I ðt  s1 Þ þ Rload 6
4
i¼1
þ 7
5>
dt Rs dt >C 1 R s
Rs > dt dt >
: ;

P
2
dIRs ðt  si Þ X5
i¼1 dIRs ðtÞ dIR ðt  s1 Þ dIRs ðtÞ ks1
¼  exp½k  ðt  si Þ; s ¼ e
dt dt i¼3
dt dt
i6¼4

P
2
dIRs ðt  si Þ
dIRs 1 dVs ðtÞ 1 Rload i¼1 Rload dIL1 ðt  s2 Þ
¼    IRs ðt  s1 Þ    
dt Rs dt C 1 Rs Rs dt Rs dt

dIRs 1 dVs ðtÞ 1 Rload dIRs ðtÞ X5


Rload dIL1 ðt  s2 Þ
¼    IRs ðt  s1 Þ    exp½k  ðt  si Þ  
dt Rs dt C1 Rs Rs dt i¼3
Rs dt
i6¼4

dIRs Rload X
5
1 dVs ðtÞ 1 Rload dIL1 ðt  s2 Þ
 ½1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ ¼    IRs ðt  s1 Þ  
dt Rs i¼3
Rs dt C1  Rs Rs dt
i6¼4
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 471

We derive the two side of the above equation and get.

d 2 IRs Rload X5
1 d 2 Vs ðtÞ 1 dIR ðtÞ Rload d 2 IL1 ðt  s2 Þ
 ½1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ ¼    s  eks1  
dt 2 Rs i¼3
Rs dt 2 C 1  Rs dt Rs dt2
i6¼4

dY2 Rload X5
1 d 2 Vs ðtÞ 1 Rload d 2 IL1 ðt  s2 Þ
 ½1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ ¼    Y2  eks1  
dt Rs i¼3
R s dt 2 C 1  R s Rs dt2
i6¼4

d 2 IL1 ðts2 Þ P
5
We consider dt2 ! e ¼ 0 then dY2
dt  ½1 þ Rload
Rs  exp½k  ðt  si Þ ¼ R1s 
i¼3
i6¼4
d 2 Vs ðtÞ
dt2  C11Rs  Y2  eks1

dY2 1 d 2 Vs ðtÞ 1
¼    Y2  eks1
dt P
5 dt2 P
5
Rs  ½1 þ Rload
Rs  exp½k  ðt  si Þ C1  Rs  ½1 þ Rload
Rs  exp½k  ðt  si Þ
i¼3 i¼3
i6¼4 i6¼4

P
2
Case I: s1 ! eð¼ 0Þ; s2 ! eð¼ 0Þ; si ! e
i¼1
Assumption: Our Bias-T circuit’s first and second microstrips parasitic effect
P
2
(delay parameters in time) is minor, s1 ! eð¼ 0Þ; s2 ! eð¼ 0Þ; si ! e
i¼1

X
5
Rload X5
Rload
lim exp½k  ðt  si Þ ¼ 1; 1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ ¼ 1 þ ;
si !e Rs Rs
i¼1;2 i¼3 i¼3
i6¼4 i6¼4

dY2 1 d Vs ðtÞ
2
1
¼    Y2  eks1
dt Rs  ½1 þ Rs 
Rload dt2 C1  Rs  ½1 þ Rs 
Rload

dY1 1 R1 X5
¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ   ½1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ
dt L1  C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðtÞ R1 1 dVs ðtÞ
þ Y2  þ s þ Y3  eks3   
L1 C1  L1 L1 L1 dt
472 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Expression for differential equation: dY3


dt ¼ . . .. . .:

dIC2 dI52a ðt  s4 Þ dI52a ðt  s4 Þ dI52a ðtÞ ks4


IC2 ¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ ) ¼ ; ¼ e
dt dt dt dt
dVA5 Vb  VA5 dVA5 dVb dIRb dVb
IC 2 ¼ C 2  ; IR b ¼ ) VA5 ¼ Vb  IRb  Rb ; ¼   Rb ; ¼0
dt Rb dt dt dt dt
dIR dIC2 d 2 IR d 2 IR dI52a ðtÞ ks4
IC2 ¼ C2  Rb  b ) ¼ C2  Rb  2 b ; C2  Rb  2 b ¼ e
dt dt dt dt dt
d 2 IR dI52a ðtÞ ks4 d 3 IR d 2 I52a ðtÞ ks4
 C 2  Rb  2 b ¼ e ) C2  Rb  3 b ¼ e ;
dt dt dt dt2
d 2 I52a ðtÞ dY3
¼
dt2 dt

d 3 IRb dY3 ks4 d 3 IRb dY3


C2  Rb  ¼ e ; 3 ! ðe ¼ 0Þ ) ¼0
dt3 dt dt dt

We can summery our system five Delay Differential Equations (DDE):

dY1 1 R1 X5
¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ   ½1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ þ Y2
dt L1  C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðtÞ R1 1 dVs ðtÞ
 þ s þ Y3  eks3   
L1 C1  L1 L1 L1 dt

dY2 1 d 2 Vs ðtÞ 1 dY3


¼    Y2  eks1 ;
dt Rs  ½1 þ Rs 
Rload dt 2
C1  Rs  ½1 þ Rs 
Rload dt
dIRs dI52a
¼ 0; ¼Y2 ; ¼ Y3
dt dt

Remark: Some of our system variables include time argument X(t) and other
without time argument. Always consider these system variables as a function of
time.
We consider RF signal source Vs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; jnðtÞj\1 & A0  jnðtÞj [

dVs ðtÞjA0 jnðtÞj dnðtÞ d 2 Vs ðtÞjA0 jnðtÞj


Vs ðtÞjA0 jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ  A0 ; ¼ ! e;
dt dt dt2
d 2 nðtÞ
¼ ! e:
dt2

Under the above consideration we can rewrite our system five Delay Differential
P2
Equations (DDE): s1 ! eð¼ 0Þ; s2 ! eð¼ 0Þ; si ! e; eks1 ! 1
i¼1
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 473

2 3
dY1 1 6 R1 X5 7
¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ  61 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ7
5 þ Y2
dt L1  C2 4 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðtÞ R1
 þ s þ Y3  eks3 
L1 C1  L1 L1

dY2 1 dY3 dIR dI52a


¼ h i  Y2 ; ¼ 0; s ¼Y2 ; ¼ Y3
dt C1  Rs  1 þ Rload dt dt dt
Rs

&&&
2 3
dY1 1 6 R1 X5 7
¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ  61 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ7
5 þ Y2
dt L1  C2 4 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðtÞ R1
 þ s þ Y3  eks3 
L1 C1  L1 L1
2 3

ðjÞ 1 6 R1 X
5 7
y1  k  ekt ¼ ½I52a þ i52a  ekðts4 Þ   61þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ7
L1  C2 4 Rb i¼3
5
i6¼4

ðjÞ Rs 1 ðjÞ
þ ½Y2 þ y2  ekt   þ  ½I þ iRs  ekt 
L1 C1  L1 Rs
ðjÞ R1
þ ½Y3 þ y3  ekt   eks3 
L1
2 3

ðjÞ 1 6 R1 X5 7
y1  k  ekt ¼ I52a  6
4 1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ7
5
L1  C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ ðjÞ R1
þ Y2  þ  I þ Y3  eks3 
L1 C1  L1 Rs L1
1 R1 X5
þ  ½1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ  i52a  ekðts4 Þ
L1  C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs 1 R1
þ  y2  ekt þ  iR  ekt þ y3  ekt  eks3 
L1 C1  L1 s L1
474 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

ðjÞ P
5
ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point I52a  L11C2  ½1 þ R1
Rb  exp½k  ðt  si Þ þ Y2  LR1s þ 1
C1 L1  IRs þ
i¼3
i6¼4
ðjÞ
Y3  eks3  RL11 ¼ 0

1 R1 X5
Rs
y1  k  ekt ¼  ½1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ  i52a  ekt  eks4 þ  y2
L1  C2 Rb i¼3
L1
i6¼4
kt 1 R1
e þ  iR  ekt þ y3  ekt  eks3 
C1  L1 s L1

Dividing the two side of the above equation by ekt term gives the equation:
2 3
1 6 R1 X5 7 Rs 1
y1  k þ 6
41 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ7
5  i52a  eks4 þ  y2 þ
L1  C2 Rb i¼3
L1 C1  L1
i6¼4
R1
 iRs þ y3  eks3 
L1
¼0

dY2 1
¼ h i  Y2 ; y2  k  ekt
dt C1  Rs  1 þ Rload
Rs
1
¼ h i  ½Y2ðjÞ þ y2  ekt 
C1  Rs  1 þ Rload
Rs

 
ðjÞ
At fixed point  1
R  Y2 ¼ 0; k  1
R  y2 ¼ 0
C1 Rs ½1 þ load
Rs  C1 Rs ½1 þ load
Rs 

dY3 dIR
¼ 0 ) y3  k  ekt ¼ 0 ) y3  k ¼ 0; s ¼Y2
dt dt
ðjÞ
) iRs  k  ekt ¼Y2 þ y2  ekt

ðjÞ
At fixed point Y2 ¼ 0 ) iRs  k  ekt ¼y2  ekt ) iRs  k þ y2 ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ Y3 ) i52a  k  ekt ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt . At fixed point Y3 ¼ 0 ) i52a 
dI52a
dt
k þ y3 ¼ 0
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 475

The small increments Jacobian of our Bias-T circuit is as follow:


0 1
y1
0 1 B C
!11 . . . !15 B y2 C
B C
B . .. .. C B C
B . C  B y3 C ¼ 0; !11 ¼ k; !12 ¼ Rs ;
@ . . . A B C
B C L1
!51    !55 B iR C
@ sA
i52a
R1 ks3 1
!13 ¼ e ; !14 ¼
L1 C1  L1
2 3
1 6 R1 X5 7 ks
!15 ¼ 6 1 þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ7
5e
4
; !21 ¼ 0;
L1  C2 4 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
1
!22 ¼ k  h i
C1  Rs  1 þ Rload
Rs

!23 ¼ 0; !24 ¼ 0; !25 ¼ 0; !31 ¼ 0; !32 ¼ 0; !33 ¼ k; !34 ¼ 0; !35 ¼ 0


!41 ¼ 0; !42 ¼ 1; !43 ¼ 0; !44 ¼ k; !45 ¼ 0; !51 ¼ 0; !52 ¼ 0; !53 ¼ 1;
!54 ¼ 0; !55 ¼ k
0 1
!11 . . . !15
B .. .. .. C
jA  k  Ij ¼ @ . . . A ; detjA  k  Ij ¼ 0. We define for simplicity
!51    !55
the following parameters: r1 ¼ LR1s ; r2 ¼ RL11 ; r3 ¼ C11L1 ; r4 ¼ L11C2 ; r5 ¼ RR1b

1
r6 ¼  h i ; !12 ¼ r1 ; !13 ¼ r2  eks3 ;
C1  Rs  1 þ RRload
s
2 3
6 X
5 7 ks
!14 ¼ r3 ; !15 ¼ r4  6
4 1 þ r 5  exp½k  ðt  si Þ7
5e
4

i¼3
i6¼4

 22 ¼ k þ r6 ; detjA  k  Ij ¼ k4  ðk þ r6 Þ ¼ 0;
1
k1 ¼ 0; k2 ¼ r6 ¼ 
C1  Rs  ½1 þ RRload
s

476 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

We get a stability solution which is independent on Bias-T microstrip delay lines


parameters, k1 = 0, k2 < 0 then our stability map is attracting line [26].
P2
Case II: 1  s1 [ 0; 1  s2 [ 0; 1  si [ 0 then our system delay differ-
i¼1
d 2 Vs ðtÞ d 2 IL1 ðts2 Þ
ential equations are as below. dt2 ! e; dt2 !e
2 3
dY1 1 6 R1 X
5 7
¼ I52a ðt  s4 Þ  61þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ7
5 þ Y2
dt L1  C2 4 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðt  s1 Þ R1 1 dVs ðtÞ
 þ s þ Y3  eks3   
L1 C1  L1 L1 L1 dt

dY2 1
¼ 2 3  Y2  eks1 ;
dt
6 P
5
7
C1  Rs  41 þ Rload
Rs  exp½k  ðt  si Þ5
i¼3
i6¼4
dY3 dIR dI52a
¼ 0; s ¼Y2 ; ¼ Y3
dt dt dt

Small increment equations: i52a  k þ y3 ¼ 0


" #
1 R1 X5
Rs
 y1  k þ  1þ  exp½k  ðt  si Þ  i52a  eks4 þ  y2
L1  C2 Rb i¼3
L1
i6¼4
1 R1
þ  iRs  eks1 þ y3  eks3  ¼0
C1  L1 L1

1
 y2  k  2 3  y2  eks1 ¼ 0;
6 P
5
7
C1  Rs  41 þ Rload
Rs  exp½k  ðt  si Þ5
i¼3
i6¼4

 y3  k ¼ 0; iRs  k þ y2 ¼ 0
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 477

The small increments Jacobian of our Bias-T circuit is as follow:


0 1
y1
0 1 B C
!11 ...!15 B y2 C
B C
B . .. .. C B C
B . C B C
@ . . . A  B y3 C ¼ 0;
B C
!51 !55 B iR C
@ sA
i52a
Rs R1 ks3 1
!11 ¼ k; !12 ¼ ; !13 ¼ e ; !14 ¼  eks1
L1 L1 C1  L1
2 P5 3
k si
6 i¼3 7
1 6 R1 i6¼4 7 ks4
!15 ¼  61 þ e 7e ; !21 ¼ 0;
L1  C2 4 Rb 5

1
!22 ¼ k  2 P2 3  eks1
k si
C1  Rs  41 þ Rload
Rs e i¼1 5

!23 ¼ 0; !24 ¼ 0; !25 ¼ 0; !31 ¼ 0;


!32 ¼ 0; !33 ¼ k; !34 ¼ 0; !35 ¼ 0
!41 ¼ 0; !42 ¼ 1; !43 ¼ 0; !44 ¼ k;
!45 ¼ 0; !51 ¼ 0; !52 ¼ 0; !53 ¼ 1; !54 ¼ 0; !55 ¼ k
0 1
!11 . . . !15
B .. .. .. C
jA  k  I j ¼ @ . . . A; detjA  k  I j ¼ 0: We define for simplicity
!51    !55
the following parameters: r1 ¼ LR1s ; r2 ¼ RL11 ; r3 ¼ C11L1 ; r4 ¼ L11C2 ; r5 ¼ RR1b

1
r6 ðs1 ; s2 Þ ¼  2 P2 3  eks1 ;  12 ¼ r1 ;  13 ¼ r2  eks3 ;
k si
C1  Rs  41 þ Rload
Rs e i¼1 5

 14 ¼ r3  eks1
2 P
5 3
k si
6 i¼3 7
6 i6¼4 7 ks4
 15 ¼ r4  61 þ r5  e 7e ;  22 ¼ k þ r6 ; detjA  k  Ij ¼ k4  ðk þ r6 Þ ¼ 0
4 5

detjA  k  I j ¼ k4  ðk þ r6 Þ ¼ k5 þ k4  r6 ðs1 ; s2 Þ; Dðs1 ; s2 Þ ¼ k5 þ k4  r6 ðs1 ; s2 Þ


478 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

We need to find Dðs1 ; s2 Þ for the following cases: (A) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0


(B) s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s (C) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s. We need to get characteristics equations for
all above stability analysis cases. We study the occurrence of any possible stability
switching, resulting from the increase of the value of the time delays s1 ; s2 for the
general characteristic equation Dðs1 ; s2 Þ. If we choose s as a parameter, then the
expression: Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n; m 2 R0 ; n [ m.
We analyze the stability switching for the third case (C) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s.

1
Dðs1 ; s2 Þ ¼ k5  k4   eks ;
C1  Rs  ½1 þ RRload
s
 e 2ks 

Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k5 ; Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ k4  f ðk; sÞ


1 1
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ k4  h i ; f ðk; sÞ ¼ h i
C1  Rs  1 þ Rs  e2ks
Rload
C1  Rs  1 þ RRload
s
 e 2ks

The exponential function e1ðk;sÞ ; 1ðk; sÞ ¼ 2  k  s can be characterized in a


variety of equivalent ways. In particular it may be defined by the following power
P
1 n
series: 1 ¼ 1ðk; sÞ; e1ðk;sÞ ¼ 1  1 þ 12!  13! þ . . . ¼ 1
2 3 n
n!  ð1Þ .
n¼0
12
1ðk;sÞ
 13!
3
We take it as approximation expression: e  1 1þ 2!

4  s3 Rload 2ks
e2ks  1  k  2  s þ k2  2  s2  k3  ; C1  Rs  1 þ e
3 Rs
¼ C1  Rs þ C1  Rload  e2ks
C1  Rs þ C1  Rload  e2ks ¼ C1  ½Rs þ Rload   k  2  C1  Rload  s
4  s3
þ k2  2  C1  Rload  s2  k3  C1  Rload 
3
1
f ðk; sÞ 
C1  ½Rs þ Rload   k  2  C1  Rload  s þ k2  2  C1  Rload  s2  k3  C1  Rload  4s3
3

Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ k4  f ðk; sÞ


k4
¼
C1  ½Rs þ Rload   k  2  C1  Rload  s þ k2  2  C1  Rload  s2  k3  C1  Rload  4s3
3

Qm ðk; sÞ  C1  ½Rs þ Rload   k  2  C1  Rload  Qm ðk; sÞ  s


þ k2  2  C1  Rload  Qm ðk; sÞ  s2
4  s3 X4
 k3  C1  Rload  Qm ðk; sÞ  þ k4 ¼ 0; wi ðk; sÞ  ki ¼ 0
3 i¼0
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 479

w0 ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðk; sÞ  C1  ½Rs þ Rload ; w1 ðk; sÞ ¼ 2  C1  Rload  Qm ðk; sÞ  s


w2 ðk; sÞ ¼ 2  C1  Rload  Qm ðk; sÞ  s2 ; w3 ðk; sÞ
4  s3
¼ C1  Rload  Qm ðk; sÞ  ; w4 ðk; sÞ ¼ 1
3

We can solve a quartic function by factoring it into a product of two quadratic


P
4
equations: wi ðk; sÞ  ki ¼ ðk2 þ k  C1 þ C2 Þ  ðk2 þ k  C3 þ C4 Þ.
i¼0

X
4
wi ðk; sÞ  ki ¼ k4 þ k3  ðC3 þ C1 Þ þ k2  ðC4 þ C1  C3 þ C2 Þ
i¼0
þ k  ðC1  C4 þ C3  C2 Þ þ C2  C4

w0 ðk; sÞ ¼ C2  C4 ; w1 ðk; sÞ ¼ C1  C4 þ C3  C2 ; w2 ðk; sÞ


¼ C4 þ C1  C3 þ C2
w3 ðk; sÞ ¼ C3 þ C1 ; w4 ðk; sÞ ¼ 1

Remark: it is easier to solve the above equations numerically rather than ana-
lytically. The target is to find the two quadratic equations parameters as a function
of Qm ðk; sÞ.Ck ðQm ðk; sÞ; s; . . .Þ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4.
P
4
We have two possible solutions: wi ðk; sÞ  ki ¼ ðk2 þ k  C1 þ C2 Þ
i¼0
 ðk2 þ k  C3 þ C4 Þ ¼ 0
k2 þ k  C1 ðQm ðk; sÞ; s; . . .Þ þ C2 ðQm ðk; sÞ; s; . . .Þ ¼ 0 or k2 þ k  C3 ðQm ðk; sÞ;
s; . . .Þ þ C4 ðQm ðk; sÞ; s; . . .Þ ¼ 0.

X
m X
n¼5
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ; m\n ¼ 5; Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k5 ; Pn¼5 ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ  kk
k¼0 k¼0

p0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p2 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p3 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p4 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p5 ðsÞ ¼ 1

The homogenous system for Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; IRs ; I52a leads to a characteristic equation


P5
for the eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j
j¼0
P
m\5
QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j . The coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on
j¼0
qi ; qk and delay parameter s. qi ; qk are any Bias-T circuit’s global parameter, other
parameters kept as a constant. Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the
varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, and cj. The
coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their arguments, and
direct substitution shows that a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for qi ; qk 2 R þ ; that is k = 0 is not of
480 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0. Furthermore Pðk; sÞ; Qðk; sÞ are analytic functions of
k, for which the following requirements of the analysis (Kuang and Cong 2005;
Kuang 1993) can also be verified in the present case.
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) j QðkÞ
PðkÞ j is bounded for jkj ! 1. Rek 0 no roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable with
respect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ cannot have common imaginary roots.
That is for any real number x. Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0.

X
m \5
Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ i  x5 ; Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  ik  xk ; 0 k m\n ¼ 5
k¼0
ik ; i0 ¼ 1; i1 ¼ i; i2 ¼ 1; i3 ¼ i; i4 ¼ 1; Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0
X
m\5
 i  x5 þ qk ðsÞ  ik  xk 6¼ 0; jPðix; sÞj2 ¼ x10
k¼0
" #2 " #2
X
2 X
1
2k þ 1
jQðix; sÞj2m¼4 ¼ q2k ðsÞ  ð1Þ  x k 2k
þ k
q2k þ 1 ðsÞ  ð1Þ  x
k¼0 k¼0
" #2
2 2
X
2
k
FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj  jQði  xÞj ¼ x  10
q2k ðsÞ  ð1Þ  x 2k

k¼0
" #2
X
1
k 2k þ 1
 q2k þ 1 ðsÞ  ð1Þ  x
k¼0
X
2 X
1
q2k ðsÞ  ð1Þk  x2k ¼ q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2 þ q4 ðsÞ  x4 ; q2k þ 1 ðsÞ  ð1Þk
k¼0 k¼0
2k þ 1
x ¼ q1 ðsÞ  x  q3 ðsÞ  x 3

" #2
X
2
k
q2k ðsÞ  ð1Þ  x 2k
¼ q20 ðsÞ  2  q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2 þ ½q22 ðsÞ þ 2  q0 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ  x4
k¼0

 2  q2 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ  x6 þ q24 ðsÞ  x8


4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 481

" #2
X
1
k 2k þ 1
q2k þ 1 ðsÞ  ð1Þ  x ¼ q21 ðsÞ  x2  2  q1 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ  x4 þ q23 ðsÞ  x6
k¼0

" #2 " #2
X2 X1
k k 2k þ 1
q2k ðsÞ  ð1Þ  x þ
2k
q2k þ 1 ðsÞ  ð1Þ x
k¼0 k¼0

¼ q20 ðsÞ þ ½q21 ðsÞ  2  q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2


þ ½q22 ðsÞ þ 2  q0 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ  2  q1 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ  x4 þ ½q23 ðsÞ
 2  q2 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ  x6 þ q24 ðsÞ  x8

FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ q20 ðsÞ  ½q21 ðsÞ  2  q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2
 ½q22 ðsÞ þ 2  q0 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ  2  q1 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ  x4
 ½q23 ðsÞ  2  q2 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ  x6  q24 ðsÞ  x8 þ x10

We define the following parameters for simplicity P0 ; P2 ; P4 ; P6 ; P8 ; P10

P0 ðsÞ ¼ q20 ðsÞ; P2 ðsÞ ¼ ½q21 ðsÞ  2  q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ; P4 ðsÞ


¼ ½q22 ðsÞ þ 2  q0 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ  2  q1 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ
P6 ðsÞ ¼ ½q23 ðsÞ  2  q2 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ; P8 ðsÞ ¼ q24 ðsÞ; P10 ðsÞ ¼ 1:

P
5
Hence FðxÞ ¼ 0 implies P2k  x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ q1 ðsÞ  x  q3 ðsÞ  x3

PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ 0; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x5 ; QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2 þ q4 ðsÞ  x4


PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2

We use different parameters terminology from our last characteristics parameters


definition: k ! j; pk ðsÞ ! aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 5; m\5; n [ m
P5
Additionally Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! Qðk; sÞ then PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j
j¼0
482 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

X
m\5
Qðk; sÞ ¼ cj  k j ; PðkÞ ¼ k5 ; a0 ¼ a1 ¼ a2 ¼ a3 ¼ a4 ¼ 0; a5 ¼ 1
j¼0

X
m\5
Qðk; sÞ ¼ c j  k j ¼ c 0 þ c 1  k þ c 2  k2 þ c 3  k3 þ c 4  k4
j¼0

n; m 2 R0 ; n [ m and aj ; cj :R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable function


of s such that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0. In the following “—” denotes complex and conjugate.
PðkÞ; Qðk; sÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s. The coefficients
faj ðRs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; sÞ and cj ðRs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; sÞg 2 R
depend on Bias-T’s Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; s values. Unless strictly necessary,
the designation of the varied arguments: ðRs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; sÞ will sub-
sequently be omitted from P; Q; aj ; cj . The coefficients aj, cj are continuous and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 þ c0 6¼ 0.a0 ¼ 0 ; c0 ¼ q0 ðsÞ; a0 þ c0 6¼ 0 ) q0 ðsÞ 6¼ 0.
8 Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; s 2 R þ i.e. k = 0 is not a root of the characteristic
equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; Qðk; sÞ are analytic functions of k for which the fol-
lowing requirements of the analysis (see Kuang 1993, Sect. 3.4) can also be verified
in the present case.
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0 i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
ðRs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; sÞ domain of interest.
(b) j Qðk;sÞ
PðkÞ j is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from ∞. Indeed,
Pm\5 j
cj k P
m\5
in the limit: j Qðk;sÞ
PðkÞ j ¼ j j¼0
k5
j¼j cj  kj5 j
j¼0

2 2 P5
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj  jQði  xÞj ; FðxÞ ¼ P2k  x2k has at most a finite
k¼0
number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x (degree in x10).
(d) Each positive root xðRs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; sÞ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous
and differentiable with respect to Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; s. This condition
can be assessed numerically.

In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have Pði  xÞ ¼


Pði  xÞ and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ thus, x > 0 maybe on eigenvalue of character-
istic equations. The analysis consists in identifying the roots of the characteristic
equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k—plane, whereby
increasing the parameters: Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; s Rek may, at the crossing,
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
change its sign from (−) to (+), i.e. from stable focus E ðjÞ ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; I52a ; IRs Þ
j ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . . to an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature may be further
assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with respect to
Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; s.
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 483

@Rek
K1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ¼ Const; x 2 R þ
@s k¼ix

When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ; Qðk; sÞ ¼ QR ðk; sÞ þ i  QI ðk; sÞ and


inserting k ¼ i  x into Bias-T circuit’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the
following:

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin x  s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos x  s ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2

where jQði  x; sÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above sin x  s and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and
adding the sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note: F(x) is dependent on s. Now it is important to notice that if s 62 I(assume
that I
R þ 0 is the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of F(x) and for s 62 I,xðsÞ is not
defined. Then for all s in I, xðsÞ is satisfied that FðxÞ ¼ 0. Then there are no
positive xðsÞ solutions for FðxÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have stability switches. For
s 2 I where xðsÞ is a positive solution of FðxÞ ¼ 0, we can define the angle
hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . .
And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ 2  n  p 8 n 2 R0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ þ 2np
; n 2 R0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions: I !
R; Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 R0 that is continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following the subscripts k; x; Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; :: indicate the corre-
sponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on K(x), remember in
kðRs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; ::Þ and xðRs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; ::Þ, and keeping
all parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in reference
[BK]. Differentiating Bias-T circuit characteristic equation PðkÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼
0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and inverting the derivative, for conve-
nience, one calculates:
Remark: x ¼ Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; ::

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ

@Q @Q
where Pk ¼ @P @P
@k ; Qk ¼ @k ; Px ¼ @x ; Qx ¼ @x , substituting k ¼ i  x and bearing
@Pðk;xÞ
Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ; Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ: Then @k ¼ @Pðk;xÞ @Pðk;xÞ
@½ix ¼ i@x ¼
i  @Pðk;xÞ
@x
484 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

i  @Pðk;xÞ @Pðk;xÞ
@k ¼ @x ; i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ; i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ and that on
the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains:

@k i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  xÞj2


ð Þ1 jk¼ix ¼ ð Þ
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ;


Q ¼ QR þ i  QI

Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; P2


¼ P2R þ P2I ¼ x10

When (x) can be any Bias-T circuit parameter’s Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb and s


etc. Where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments ði  x; xÞ, and where
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ; xx ¼ F Fx
x

Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ. We define U and V:

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = s.

QI ¼ q1 ðsÞ  x  q3 ðsÞ  x3 ; PR ¼ 0; PI ¼ x5 ; QR ¼ q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2 þ q4 ðsÞ  x4


PRx ¼ 0; PIx ¼ 5  x4 ; QIx ¼ q1 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ  3  x2 ;
QRx ¼ 2  q2 ðsÞ  x þ 4  q4 ðsÞ  x3
@q1 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ 3
PRs ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0; QIs ¼ x x ;
@s @s
@q0 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ 2 @q4 ðsÞ 4
QRs ¼  x þ x
@s @s @s
Fs
xs ¼ ; PRx  PR ¼ 0; QRx  QR ¼ ½2  q2 ðsÞ  x þ 4  q4 ðsÞ  x3 
Fx
 ½q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2 þ q4 ðsÞ  x4 
QRx  QR ¼ 2  q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x þ 2  ½q22 ðsÞ þ 2  q0 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ  x3
 6  q2 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ  x5 þ 4  q24 ðsÞ  x7
!1 ðsÞ ¼ 2  q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ; !3 ðsÞ ¼ 2  ½q22 ðsÞ þ 2  q0 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ;
!5 ðsÞ ¼ 6  q2 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ
X
4
!7 ðsÞ ¼ 4  q24 ðsÞ; QRx  QR ¼ !2k1  x2k1 ; PR  PIx ¼ 0; PI  PRx ¼ 0;
k¼1
PIx  PI ¼ 5  x9
QIx  QI ¼ ½q1 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ  3  x2   ½q1 ðsÞ  x  q3 ðsÞ  x3 
¼ q21 ðsÞ  x  4  q1 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ  x3 þ 3  q23 ðsÞ  x5
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 485

w1 ðsÞ ¼ q21 ðsÞ; w3 ðsÞ ¼ 4  q1 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ; w5 ðsÞ ¼ 3  q23 ðsÞ; QIx  QI
X
3
¼ w2k1 ðsÞ  x2k1
k¼1
QR  QIx ¼ ½q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2 þ q4 ðsÞ  x4   ½q1 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ  3  x2  ¼ q0 ðsÞ  q1 ðsÞ
 ½3  q0 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ þ q2 ðsÞ  q1 ðsÞ  x2 þ ½3  q3 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ þ q4 ðsÞ  q1 ðsÞ  x4
 3  q4 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ  x6

A0 ðsÞ ¼ q0 ðsÞ  q1 ðsÞ; A2 ðsÞ ¼ ½3  q0 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ þ q2 ðsÞ  q1 ðsÞ


A4 ðsÞ ¼ 3  q3 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ þ q4 ðsÞ  q1 ðsÞ; A6 ðsÞ ¼ 3  q4 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ;
X
3
QR  QIx ¼ A2k ðsÞ  x2k
k¼0
QI  QRx ¼ ½q1 ðsÞ  x  q3 ðsÞ  x3   ½2  q2 ðsÞ  x þ 4  q4 ðsÞ  x3 
¼ 2  q1 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2
þ 2  ½2  q4 ðsÞ  q1 ðsÞ þ q2 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ  x4  4  q3 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ  x6
n2 ðsÞ ¼ 2  q1 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ; n4 ðsÞ ¼ 2  ½2  q4 ðsÞ  q1 ðsÞ þ q2 ðsÞ  q3 ðsÞ;
n6 ðsÞ ¼ 4  q3 ðsÞ  q4 ðsÞ
X
3
QI  QRx ¼ n2k ðsÞ  x2k ; PR  PIs ¼ 0; PI  PRs ¼ 0
k¼1
@q1 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ 3
QR  QIs ¼ ½q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2 þ q4 ðsÞ  x4   ½ x x 
@s @s
@q1 ðsÞ
¼ q0 ðsÞ  x
@s
@q3 ðsÞ @q1 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ
 ½q0 ðsÞ  þ q2 ðsÞ    x3 þ ½q2 ðsÞ 
@s @s @s
@q1 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ 7
þ q4 ðsÞ    x  q4 ðsÞ 
5
x
@s  @s
@q1 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ @q1 ðsÞ
f1 ðsÞ ¼ q0 ðsÞ  ; f3 ðsÞ ¼  q0 ðsÞ  þ q2 ðsÞ 
@s @s @s
@q3 ðsÞ @q1 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ
f5 ðsÞ ¼ q2 ðsÞ  þ q4 ðsÞ  ; f7 ðsÞ ¼ q4 ðsÞ  ;
@s @s @s
X 3
QR  QIs ¼ f2k þ 1  x2k þ 1
K¼0
486 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

@q0 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ 2 @q4 ðsÞ 4


QI  QRs ¼ ½q1 ðsÞ  x  q3 ðsÞ  x3   ½  x þ x 
@s @s @s
@q0 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ @q0 ðsÞ
¼ q1 ðsÞ   x  ½q1 ðsÞ  þ q3 ðsÞ    x3
@s @s @s
@q4 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ @q4 ðsÞ 7
þ ½q1 ðsÞ  þ q3 ðsÞ    x5  q3 ðsÞ  x
@s @s @s
@q0 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ @q0 ðsÞ
g1 ðsÞ ¼ q1 ðsÞ  ; g3 ðsÞ ¼ ½q1 ðsÞ  þ q3 ðsÞ  
@s @s @s
@q4 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ @q4 ðsÞ
g5 ðsÞ ¼ q1 ðsÞ  þ q3 ðsÞ  ; g7 ðsÞ ¼ q3 ðsÞ  ;
@s @s @s
X3
QI  QRs ¼ g2k þ 1 ðsÞ  x2k þ 1
k¼0

X
3
Fx ¼ 10  x9  2  ½ ½w2k1 ðsÞ þ  2k1   x2k1 þ  7  x7 
k¼1
@q0 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ 2 @q4 ðsÞ 4
Fs ¼ 2  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þ ¼ 2  ð½  x þ  x 
@s @s @s
@q1 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ 3
½q0 ðsÞ  q2 ðsÞ  x2 þ q4 ðsÞ  x4  þ ½ x  x 
@s @s
½q1 ðsÞ  x  q3 ðsÞ  x3 Þ

@q0 ðsÞ @q0 ðsÞ


Fs ¼ 2  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þ ¼ 2  f  q0 ðsÞ  ½  q2 ðsÞ
@s @s
@q2 ðsÞ @q1 ðsÞ
þ  q0 ðsÞ   q1 ðsÞ  x2
@s @s
@q0 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ @q4 ðsÞ @q1 ðsÞ
þ½  q4 ðsÞ þ  q2 ðsÞ þ  q0 ðsÞ   q3 ðsÞ
@s @s @s @s
@q3 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ @q4 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ
  q1 ðsÞ  x4  ½  q4 ðsÞ þ  q2 ðsÞ   q3 ðsÞ
@s @s @s @s
@q4 ðsÞ
 x6 þ  q4 ðsÞ  x8 g
@s
@q0 ðsÞ @q0 ðsÞ
Fs ¼ 2  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þ ¼ 2   q0 ðsÞ þ 2  ½  q2 ðsÞ
@s @s
@q2 ðsÞ @q1 ðsÞ @q0 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ
þ  q0 ðsÞ   q1 ðsÞ  x2  2  ½  q4 ðsÞ þ  q2 ðsÞ
@s @s @s @s
@q4 ðsÞ @q1 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ
þ  q0 ðsÞ   q3 ðsÞ   q1 ðsÞ  x4
@s @s @s
@q2 ðsÞ @q4 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ @q4 ðsÞ
þ2  ½  q4 ðsÞ þ  q2 ðsÞ   q3 ðsÞ  x6  2   q4 ðsÞ  x8
@s @s @s @s
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 487

We define for simplicity the following functions: B0 ðsÞ ¼ 2  @q@s


0 ðsÞ
 q0 ðsÞ

@q0 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ @q1 ðsÞ
B2 ðsÞ ¼ 2   q2 ðsÞ þ  q0 ðsÞ   q1 ðsÞ
@s @s @s

@q0 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ @q4 ðsÞ
B4 ðsÞ ¼ 2   q4 ðsÞ þ  q2 ðsÞ þ  q0 ðsÞ
@s @s @s

@q1 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ
  q3 ðsÞ   q1 ðsÞ
@s @s

@q2 ðsÞ @q4 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ
B6 ðsÞ ¼ 2   q4 ðsÞ þ  q2 ðsÞ   q3 ðsÞ ;
@s @s @s
@q4 ðsÞ
B8 ðsÞ ¼ 2   q4 ðsÞ
@s
X 4
Fs ¼ 2  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þ ¼ B2k ðsÞ  x2k
k¼0
U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ
X
3 X
3
¼ ð A2k ðsÞ  x2k  n2k ðsÞ  x2k Þ
k¼0 k¼1
X
3 X
3 X
3
U¼ n2k ðsÞ  x2k  A2k ðsÞ  x2k ¼ ½n2k ðsÞ  A2k ðsÞ  x2k  A0 ðsÞ
k¼1 k¼0 k¼1

X
3 X
3
Vjx¼s ¼ ðQR  QIs  QI  QRs Þ ¼ ð f2k þ 1  x2k þ 1  g2k þ 1 ðsÞ  x2k þ 1 Þ
k¼0 k¼0
X
3
2k þ 1
¼ ½g2k þ 1 ðsÞ  f2k þ 1   x
k¼0

Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. Differentiating with respect to s and we get Fx  @x @s þ Fs ¼ 0


 
@x Fs @ Rek
s2I) ¼ xs ¼  ; K1 ðsÞ ¼ ;
@s Fx @s k¼ix
( )
2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx
K1 ðsÞ ¼ Re
Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 
  
@ Rek
signfK1 ðsÞg ¼ sign ;
@s k¼ix
( )
1 @x U  @x
@s þ V
signfK ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  sign s  þxþ
@s jPj2

We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcations)


ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Bias-T circuit, about the equilibrium points EðjÞ ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; I52a ; IRs Þ, j = 0, 1,…
488 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

As a result of a variation of delay parameter s. The analysis consists in identi-


fying the roots of our system characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis
of the complex k-plane where by increasing the delay parameter s, Rek may at the
crossing, changes its sign from − to +, i.e. from stable focus E(j) to an unstable one,
or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the
partial derivatives with respect to s,

@Rek
K1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; . . . ¼ const; x 2 R þ
@s k¼ix
( " #)
X3
signfK1 ðsÞg ¼ sign 10  x9  2  ½w2k1 ðsÞ þ !2k1   x2k1 þ !7  x7
k¼1
0 1
P
4
B B2k ðsÞ  x2k C
B k¼0 C
 signfs  B  3 C þ x
@ P A
10  x9  2  ½w2k1 ðsÞ þ !2k1   x2k1 þ !7  x7
k¼1
0 1
" # P4
X3 B B 2k ðsÞ  x 2k
C
B k¼0 C
f ½n2k ðsÞ  A2k ðsÞ  x2k  A0 ðsÞ  B  3 C
@ P A
k¼1 10  x9  2  ½w2k1 ðsÞ þ !2k1  x2k1 þ  7  x7 
k¼1

X
3
þ ½g2k þ 1 ðsÞ  f2k þ 1   x2k þ 1 g
k¼0
þ g
x10

The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally, when all Bias-T circuit parameters are
known and the stability switch due to various time delay values s is described in the
following expression:

signfK1 ðsÞg ¼ signfF


(x ðxðsÞ; sÞg )
UðxðsÞÞ  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ VðxðsÞÞ
 sign s  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ xðsÞ þ
jPðxðsÞÞj2

Remark: We know Fx ðxðsÞ; sÞ ¼ 0 implies its roots xi ðsÞ and finding those
delays values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which give complex xi or
imaginary number, then unable to analyze the stability.
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 489

4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters


Variation

A PIN diode is a diode with a wide, lightly doped ‘near’ intrinsic semiconductor
region between a p-type semiconductors an n-type semiconductor region. The
p-type and n-type regions are typically heavily doped because they are used for
ohmic contacts. The wide intrinsic region is in contrast to an ordinary PN diode.
The wide intrinsic region makes the PIN diode an inferior rectifier (one typical
function of a diode). The wide intrinsic region makes the PIN diode suitable for
many applications [33,91,92]. The PIN diode suitable for many applications:
attenuators, fast switches, photo detectors and high voltage power electronics
applications. A PIN diode operates under what is known as high level injection.
PIN’s intrinsic “i” region is flooded with charge carriers from the “p” and “n”
regions. Its function can be likened to filling up a water bucket with a hole on the
side. Once the water reaches the hole’s level it will begin to pour out. A PIN diode
obeys the standard diode equation for low frequency signals. At higher frequencies,
the diode looks like an almost perfect (very linear, even for large signals) resistor.
At low frequencies, the charge can be removed and the diode turns off. At higher
frequencies, there is not enough time to remove the charge, so the diode never turns
off. The high frequency resistance is inversely proportional to the DC bias current
through the diode. A PIN diode, suitably biased, therefore acts as a variable resistor.
The high frequency resistance may vary over a wide range (from 0.1 to 10 k-ohm in
some cases; the useful range is smaller, though). The wide intrinsic region also
means the diode will have a low capacitance when reverse biased.
PIN diode fundamentals: A PIN diode is a semiconductor device that operates as
a variable resistor at RF and microwave frequencies. The resistance value of the
PIN diode is determined only by the forward biased DC current. In switch and
attenuator applications, the PIN diode should ideally control the RF signal level
without introduction distortion which might change the shape of the RF signal. An
important additional feature of the PIN diode is its ability to control large RF
signals while using much smaller level of DC excitation. A model of a PIN diode
chip is presented and the chip is prepared by starting with a wafer of almost
intrinsically pure silicon, having high resistivity and long lifetime. A P-region is
then diffused into one diode surface and an N-region is diffused into the other
surface. The resulting intrinsic or I-region thickness (W) is a function of the
thickness of the original silicon wafer.
The area of the chip (A) depends upon how many small sections are defined
from the original wafer. The performance of the PIN diode primarily depends on
chip geometry and nature of the semiconductor material in the finished diode,
490 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

particularly in the I-region. The characteristics of PIN diodes are controlled


thickness I-regions having long carrier lifetimes and very high resistivity. These
characteristics enhance the ability to control RF signals with a minimum of dis-
tortion while requiring low DC supply. When a PIN diode is forward biased, holes
and electrons are injected from the P and N regions into the I-region. These charges
do not recombine immediately. Instead, a finite quantity of charge always remains
stored and results in a lowering of the resistivity of the I-region. The quantity of
stored charge, Q depends on the recombination time (s)—the carrier life time, and
the forward bias current (IF), Q = IFs. The resistance of the I-region under forward
2
bias, Rs is inversely proportional to Q. Rs ¼ ðl þWl ÞQ ðohmÞ, W—I-region width,
N p

lN —electron mobility, lp - hole mobility. We get the expression for Rs as an


W2
inverse function of current Rs ¼ ðl þ lp ÞIF s ðohmÞ. The equation is independent of
N

area (A). Rs is slightly dependent upon area because the effective lifetime varies
with area and thickness sðA; WÞ due to edge recombination effects. Typically, PIN
diodes display a resistance characteristic consistent with this model. Resistance of
the order of 0.1 Ohm at 1A forward bias increasing to about 10000 Ohm (10Kohm)
at 1lA. The forward bias represents a realistic range for a PIN diode. The maximum
forward resistance, Rs(max), of a PIN diode is generally specified at 100 mA
forward bias current. Some PIN diodes suppliers specifies not only the Rs(max) but
also the Rs(min) at a lower forward bias current (*10 mA). It ensures a wide range
of diode resistance which is particularly important in attenuator applications. At the
lower frequencies Rs is not constant but increases as the frequency is lowered. The
normal PIN diodes which are designed to operate in RF/Microwave frequencies
exhibit this increase in Rs in the 1–10 MHz range.
A properly designed PIN will maintain constant Rs well into the 10 kHz region.
The results obtained are valid over an extremely broad frequency range. The
practical low resistance limitations result from package parasitic inductances and
junction contact resistances. Both of which are minimized in the construction of
PIN diodes. The high resistance range of PIN diodes is usually limited by the effect
of the diode capacitance (Ct). The maximum dynamic range of the PIN diode at
high frequencies, this diode reactance may have to be tuned out. The “skin effect” is
much less pronounced in relatively poor conductors such as silicon, than with good
metallic conductors. The “skin depth” is proportional to the square root of the
resistivity of the conducting material. RF signals penetrate deeply into the semi-
conductor and “skin effect” is not a significant factor in PIN diodes below X-band
frequencies. At DC and very low frequencies, the PIN diode is similar to a PN
diode. The diode resistance is described by the dynamic resistance of the I–V
characteristics at any quiescent bias point. The DC dynamic resistance point is not,
however, valid in PIN diodes at frequencies above which the period is shorter than
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 491

the transit time of the I-region. The frequency at which this occurs, fT is called
transit time frequency and may be considered the lower frequency limit. The lower
frequency limit is primarily a function of W, the I-region thickness and can be
expressed at fT = 1300/W, where W is the I-region thickness in microns.
The conductance of the diode is proportional to the stored charge and the charge
is in turn related to the diode current by Id ¼ dQ dt þ s where Id is the diode current,
d Qd

Qd is the charge stored in the diode, s is diode recombination lifetime. If the diode is
biased with only a constant current, the stored charge is constant and is equal to
Qd ¼ Id  s. The PIN diode store charge equation:
Id ðtÞ ¼ dQdtd ðtÞ þ QdsðtÞ, Id ðtÞ is a function of time. First we consider the simpler
dQd ðtÞ
dQd ðtÞ Qd ðtÞ
equation Id ðtÞ ¼ 0. The equation is dt þ s ¼ 0 or dt
Qd ðtÞ ¼  1s
Z R1 R1
dQd 1 1
¼   dt; ln Qd ¼   dt þ const; Qd ¼ e sdt þ const ¼ A  e sdt ;
Qd s s
A ¼ econst
R
Is ¼ 1s  dt ) dIdts ¼ 1s ; Qd ¼ A  eIs ; Qd  eIs ¼ A. We can see how to solve our
equation. If we differentiate equation Qd  eIs ¼ A respect to time t and use
dt ¼ s , we get dt ðQd  e Þ ¼ dt  e þ Qd  e  dt ; dt ðQd  e Þ ¼ e  ½ dt þ Qd 
dIs 1 d Is dQd Is Is dIs d Is Is dQd

dt  e is the integrating factor. Since dt þ Qd  dt jdIs ¼1 ¼ Id then


dIs Is dQd dIs
dt s

dt ðQd  eIs Þ ¼ eIs  ½dQ


dt þ Qd  dt  ¼ e  Id . Id and e are functions of t only, we
d d dIs Is Is

can now integrate both sides of dt ðQd  e Þ ¼ e  Id with respect to time t to get
d Is Is
R R R
Qd  eIs ¼ eIs  Id  dt þ const; Qd ¼ eIs  eIs  Id  dt þ const; Is ¼ 1s dt. If we
considerRthat recombination lifetime parameter s is independent on time then
Is ¼ 1s dt ¼ 1s  t þ const. If the bias consists of both a constant current and a
low frequency RF or time varying signal, then the DC component of stored charge
will be modulated by the presence of an AC component. The degree of modulation
depends on the relative level the two charge components and the frequency of the
RF signal. At signal frequency below fc ¼ 2ps 1
the RF signal has about the same
effect as the DC bias. Above fc , the modulation effect decreases. The lifetime of PIN
diodes is determined by design and is based on the desired switching speed.
Typically, diode recombination lifetime s can be in the range of 0.005 lsec to over
3 lsec. At frequencies bellow fc , the PIN diode behaves as an ordinary PN junction
diode. The RF signal incident on the diode will be rectified and considerable
distortion of the signal will occur. In the vicinity of fc , the diode begins to behave as
a linear resistor with a small nonlinear component. At frequencies well above fc , the
492 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Fig. 4.16 PIN diode low


frequency equivalent circuit

diode appears essentially as a pure linear resistance whose value can be controlled
by the DC or a low frequency control signal. The equivalent circuit of the PIN diode
also depends on the frequency. At frequencies much less than fc the equivalent
circuit is as shown in the below figure (normal PN junction) [24] (Fig. 4.16).
In this circuit LP is the package inductance, CP is the package
 capacitance, Rs is
the series resistance, and Rj is the junction resistance Rj ¼ nkT
qIdc . Typical value for
n is 1.8 then at room temperature and Rj ¼ Idc ðmAÞ
48
. Idc is the forward DC bias current,
Cj(V) is the junction capacitance which is a function of the applied voltage. At
frequencies much higher than fc , we can draw equivalent circuit is as shown in the
below figure. LP, CP, and Rs are the same as in the low frequency equivalent circuit.
The element CI represents the I-layer capacitance which is constant and dependent
only on the geometry of the I-layer (typical values of CI are between 0.02 and 2 pF
and are dependent on diode design). The element RI represents the effective RF
resistance of the I-layer. This resistance is constant with respect to RF signal,
providing the signal frequency much higher than fc . It is variable by the DC or very
low frequency control current (Fig. 4.17).
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 493

Fig. 4.17 PIN diode high


frequency equivalent circuit

We analyze the stability of Single Pole Single Throw (SPST)) PIN switches.
The RF switch circuit requires a few components and a very simple to implement.
Nevertheless it is able to act as an RF switch for radio frequency or RF applications
and is adequate for many applications. The RF switch circuit comprises a single
PIN diode (D1), an RF inductor or choke (Lc), a current limiting resistor or RF
choke (Ld) and a DC block capacitor (Cc). In operation, when a positive potential is
applied to the control point current, this forward biases the diode and as a result the
radio frequency signal is able to pass through the circuit. When a negative bias is
applied to the circuit, the diode become reverse biased and is effectively switched
off. Under these conditions the depletion layer in the diode becomes wide and does
not allow signal to pass. PIN diodes have a number of advantages as switches. In
the first place they are more linear than ordinary PN junction diodes. This means
that in their action as a radio frequency switch they do not create as many spurious
products. Secondly when reverse biased and switched off, the depletion layer is
wider than with an ordinary diode and this provides for greater isolation when
switching. By varying the amount of bias on the PIN diode it is possible to vary the
level of attenuation provided. In this way the circuit can be used as a very simple
RF attenuator. Although the circuit can be used as an RF attenuator, more effective
RF attenuator circuits are available for more demanding applications [92, 93]
(Fig. 4.18).
494 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Fig. 4.18 PIN diode attenuator and switch

Applications of PIN diode:


• A variable resistor in a variable attenuator, a function that few other components
can achieve as effectively. The fact that when it is forward biased, the diode is
linear, behaving like a resistor, can be put to good use in a variety of
applications.
• The PIN diode can also be used as an RF switch. In the forward direction it can
be biased sufficiently to ensure it has a low resistance to the RF that needs to be
passed, and when a reverse bias is applied it acts as an open circuit, with only a
relatively small level of capacitance.
• PIN diode is for use in RF protection circuits. When used with RF, the diode
normally behaves like a resistor when a small bias is applied. Hover this is only
true for RF levels below a certain level. Above this the resistance drops con-
siderably. Thus it can be used to protect a sensitive receiver from the effects of a
large transmitter if it is placed across the receiver input.
We consider the RF source as a high frequency signal and use PIN diode high
frequency equivalent circuit.

VA1  VA2 d
VA1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ; IRsource ¼ ; IRsource ¼ ICc ; ICc ¼ Cc  ðVA2  VA3 Þ; VLd
Rsource dt
dIL
¼ Vd  VA3 ¼ Ld  d
dt

(Fig. 4.19).
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 495

Fig. 4.19 PIN diode attenuator and switch equivalent circuit

dILp VA  VA5 VA  VA6


VLp ¼ VA3  VA4 ¼ Lp  ; ILp ¼ IRs ; IRs ¼ 4 ; IR I ¼ 5 ; I CI
dt Rs RI
d
¼ CI  ðVA5  VA6 Þ
dt
d dIL VA6
I Cp ¼ C p  ðVA3  VA6 Þ; VA6 ¼ VLc ¼ Lc  c ; IRload ¼ ; VLc ¼ VRload ¼ Vout
dt dt Rload

We write our circuit Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL) for all nodes:

Vs ðtÞ  VA2
IRsource ¼ ) Vs ðtÞ  VA2 ¼ IRsource  Rsource ; VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource
Rsource
Z
d 1 d 1
ICc ¼ Cc  ðVA2  VA3 Þ ) ICc  ¼ ðVA2  VA3 Þ; VA2  VA3 ¼  ICc  dt
dt Cc dt Cc
Z Z
1 1
VA3 ¼ VA2   ICc  dt; VA3 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource   ICc  dt
Cc Cc

Table 4.4 PIN diode attenuator and switch equivalent circuit Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL) for
all nodes
Node number KCL @ Ai
A2 IRsource ¼ ICc
A3 ICc þ ILd ¼ ILp þ ICp
A4 ILp ¼ IRs
A5 IRs ¼ IRI þ ICI
A6 IRI þ ICI þ ICp ¼ ILc þ IRload
496 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
Z
dIL 1 dILd
Vd  VA3 ¼ Ld  d ; Vd  ½Vs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource   ICc  dt ¼ Ld 
dt Cc dt
Z
d 1 d 2 I Ld
fVd  ½Vs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource   ICc  dtg ¼ Ld 
dt Cc dt2

dVd dVs ðtÞ dIRsource 1 d 2 IL dVd


 þ  Rsource þ  ICc ¼ Ld  2 d ; !e
dt dt dt Cc dt dt

d 2 ILd
First system differential equation:  dVdts ðtÞ þ dIRsource
dt  Rsource þ 1
Cc  ICc ¼ Ld  dt2

dILp dIL
VA3  VA4 ¼ Lp  ) VA4 ¼ VA3  p ; VA4
dt dt Z
1 dIL
¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource   ICc  dt  p
Cc dt

dILp dIL
VA3  VA4 ¼ Lp  ) VA4 ¼ VA3  Lp  p ; VA4 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource
Z dt dt
1 dILp
  ICc  dt  Lp 
Cc dt
VA4  VA5
IRs ¼ ) VA4  VA5 ¼ IRs  Rs ; VA5 ¼ VA4  IRs  Rs
Rs
Z
1 dIL
VA5 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource   ICc  dt  Lp  p  IRs  Rs
Cc dt
VA5  VA6
IRI ¼ ) VA5  VA6 ¼ IRI  RI ; VA6 ¼ VA5  IRI  RI
RI
Z
1 dIL
VA5 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource   ICc  dt  Lp  p  IRs  Rs
Cc dt

VA5  VA6
IR I ¼ ) VA5  VA6 ¼ IRI  RI ; VA6 ¼ VA5  IRI  RI
RI
Z
1 dIL
VA6 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource   ICc  dt  Lp  p  IRs  Rs  IRI  RI
Cc dt

d VA  VA6
ICI ¼ CI ðVA5  VA6 Þ; IRI ¼ 5 ) VA5  VA6 ¼ IRI  RI ; ICI
dt RI
dIR
¼ CI  RI  I
dt
Z
d IC d 1
I Cp ¼ Cp  ðVA3  VA6 Þ ) p ¼ ðVA3  VA6 Þ; VA3  VA6 ¼  ICp  dt
dt Cp dt Cp
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 497

Z
1
Vs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource   ICc  dt  fVs ðtÞ  IRsource  Rsource
Cc
Z
1 dI L
  ICc  dt  Lp  p
Cc dt
Z
1
 IRs  Rs  IRI  RI g ¼  ICp  dt
Cp
Z  
dILp 1 d dILp
Lp  þ IRs  Rs þ IRI  RI ¼  ICp  dt; Lp  þ IRs  Rs þ IRI  RI
dt Cp dt dt
1
¼  ICp
Cp

d 2 I Lp dIRs dIRI 1 1 dIR


Lp  2
þ  Rs þ  RI ¼  ICp ;  ICI ¼ RI  I
dt dt dt Cp CI dt

d 2 ILp dIRs
Second system differential equation: Lp  dt2 þ dt  Rs þ 1
CI  ICI ¼ C1p  ICp

dILc VA6 dIL


VA6 ¼ Lc  ; IRload ¼ ; Lc  c ¼ IRload  Rload
dt Rload dt

Third system differential equation: Lc  dIdtLc ¼ IRload  Rload


We can summery our system differential equations:

d 2 ILd dVs ðtÞ 1 dIRsource Rsource 1


¼  þ  þ  I Cc
dt 2 dt Ld dt Ld Cc  Ld

d 2 I Lp 1 1 dIR Rs dIL Rload


¼  I Cp   I CI  s  ; c ¼  IRload
dt 2 Cp  Lp CI  Lp dt Lp dt Lc

dILp
Since IRs ¼ ILp ; dIdtRs ¼ dt ; IRsource ¼ ICc ; dIRdt
source
¼ dIdtCc

d 2 I Ld dVs ðtÞ 1 dICc Rsource 1


¼  þ  þ  ICc
dt 2 dt Ld dt Ld Cc  Ld

d 2 I Lp 1 1 dIL Rs dIL Rload


¼  I Cp   I CI  p  ; c ¼  IRload
dt 2 Cp  Lp CI  Lp dt Lp dt Lc

We define new variables:

dICc dIL dY2 d 2 ILd dIL dY3 d 2 ILp


Y1 ¼ ; Y2 ¼ d , ¼ 2 ; Y3 ¼ p ) ¼ 2
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt
498 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

dY2 dVs ðtÞ 1 Rsource 1


¼  þ Y1  þ  I Cc
dt dt Ld Ld Cc  Ld

dY3 1 1 Rs dIL Rload


¼  I Cp   I C I  Y3  ; c ¼  IRload
dt Cp  Lp CI  Lp Lp dt Lc

We can summery our new system differential equations:

dICc dIL dIL dY2 dVs ðtÞ 1 Rsource 1


¼ Y1 ; d ¼Y2 ; p ¼Y3 ; ¼  þ Y1  þ  ICc
dt dt dt dt dt Ld Ld Cc  Ld

dY3 1 1 Rs dIL Rload


¼  I Cp   I C I  Y3  ; c ¼  IRload
dt Cp  Lp CI  Lp Lp dt Lc

dICc dILd dILp


At fixed points: dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0; dt ¼0; dYdt2 ¼ 0; dYdt3 ¼ 0; dIdtLc ¼ 0

dVs ðtÞ 1  1 1
Y1 ¼ 0; Y2 ¼ 0; Y3 ¼ 0;  þ  I ¼ 0;  IC P   IC I ¼ 0; IRload ¼ 0
dt Cc Cc Cp CI

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium
points of PIN diode attenuator and switch circuit in adding to coor-
dinate Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3; ICc ; ILd ; ILp ; ICp ; ICI ; ILc ; IRload arbitrarily small increments of
exponentially form ½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; iCc ; iLd ; iLp ; iCp ; iCI ; iLc ; iRload   ekt and retaining the
first order terms in Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3; ICc ; ILd ; ILp ; ICp ; ICI ; ILc ; IRload . The system of
homogenous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigen-
values. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set of the below circuit
variables, circuit variables derivative and circuit variables second order derivative
with respect to time into PIN diode attenuator and switch circuit equivalent circuit.
Our PIN diode attenuator and switch circuit equivalent circuit fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; iCc ; iLd ; iLp ; iCp ; iCI ;
iLc ; iRload   ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third
fixed point), etc.,

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


Y1 ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y2 ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y3 ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ; ICc ¼ ICc þ iCc  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ILd ¼ ILd þ iLd  ekt ; ILp ¼ ILp þ iLp  ekt ; ICp ¼ ICp þ iCp  ekt ; ICI ¼ ICI þ iCI  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ dICc dIL
ILc ¼ ILc þ iLc  ekt ; IRload ¼ IRload þ iRload  ekt ; ¼ iCc  k  ekt ; d ¼ iLd  k  ekt
dt dt
dILp dY dY dI
¼ iLp  k  ekt ; ¼ y2  k  ekt ; ¼ y3  k  ekt ; c ¼ iLc  k  ekt
2 3 L
dt dt dt dt

For k < 0, t > 0, the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 is
unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for k < 0, t > 0
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 499

otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the eigenvalue
parameter which is established if the fixed point is stable or unstable; additionally,
his absolute value |k| established the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point [2–4].
We can rewrite our system differential equations:
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iCc  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt At fixed point Y1 ¼ 0 then y1  iCc  k ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iLd  k  ekt ¼Y2 þ y2  ekt At fixed point Y2 ¼ 0 then y2  iLd  k ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iLp  k  ekt ¼Y3 þ y3  ekt At fixed point Y3 ¼ 0 then y3  iLp  k ¼ 0

dY2 dVs ðtÞ 1 Rsource 1 dVs ðtÞ


¼  þ Y1  þ  I Cc ; !e
dt dt Ld Ld Cc  Ld dt
ðjÞ Rsource 1 ðjÞ
y2  k  ekt ¼ ½Y1 þ y1  ekt   þ  ½I þ iCc  ekt 
Ld Cc  Ld Cc
ðjÞ Rsource 1 ðjÞ Rsource kt 1
y2  k  ekt ¼ Y1  þ  I Cc þ y 1   e þ iCc   ekt
Ld Cc  Ld Ld Cc  Ld
ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point Y1  Rsource
Ld þ
1
Cc Ld  ICc ¼ 0 then y1  Rsource
Ld þ iCc  Cc Ld  y2  k ¼ 0
1

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ ðjÞ Rs


y3  k  ekt ¼  ½I þ iCp  ekt    ½I þ iCI  ekt   ½Y3 þ y3  ekt  
Cp  Lp Cp CI  Lp CI Lp
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ ðjÞ Rs
y3  k  ekt ¼ ½  I Cp   I C I  Y3  
Cp  Lp CI  Lp Lp
1 1 Rs
þ i Cp   ekt  iCI   ekt  y3   ekt
Cp  Lp CI  Lp Lp

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


At fixed point 1
Cp Lp  ICp  CI1Lp  ICI  Y3  LRps ¼ 0

1 1 Rs
i Cp   iCI   y3   y3  k ¼ 0
Cp  Lp CI  Lp Lp

Rload ðjÞ
iLc  k  ekt ¼  ½IRload þ iRload  ekt ; iLc  k  ekt
Lc
Rload ðjÞ Rload kt
¼  IRload þ iRload  e
Lc Lc
ðjÞ
At fixed point RLload c
 IRload ¼ 0 then iRload  RLload c
 i Lc  k ¼ 0
PIN
diode attenuator and switch circuit
system matrix
y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; iCc ; iLd ; iLp ; iCp ; iCI ; iLc ; iRload can be constructed from the below list of
equations:
500 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Rsource 1
y1  iCc  k ¼ 0; y2  iLd  k ¼ 0; y3  iLp  k ¼ 0; y1  þ iCc   y2  k
Ld Cc  Ld
¼0

1 1 Rs Rload
i Cp   iCI   y3   y3  k ¼ 0; iRload   iLc  k ¼ 0
Cp  Lp CI  Lp Lp Lc

PIN diode attenuator and switch circuit system matrixes:


0 1
iCc
B C 0 1
0 1 B iLd C 0 1 y1
i11 . . . i16 B C u11 . . . u14 B C
B C
B .. .. .. C B iLp C B ..
 þ .. .. C  B
B
iCp C
C¼0
@ . . . A B C @ . . . A B
B y2 C
B C @ iCI C
A
i61    i66 By C u61    u64
@ 3A iRload
iLc

i11 ¼ k; i12 ¼ . . . ¼ i16 ¼ 0; i21 ¼ 0; i22 ¼ k; i23 ¼ 0; i24 ¼ 1; i25 ¼ i26 ¼ 0

1
i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k; i34 ¼ 0; i35 ¼ 1; i36 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ ; i42 ¼ i43 ¼ 0; i44
Cc  Ld
¼ k; i45 ¼ i46 ¼ 0

Rs
i51 ¼ . . . ¼ i54 ¼ 0; i55 ¼ k  ; i56 ¼ 0; i61 ¼ . . . ¼ i65 ¼ 0; i66 ¼ k; u11
Lp
¼ 1; u12 ¼ u13 ¼ u14 ¼ 0

Rsource
u21 ¼ . . . ¼ u24 ¼ 0; u31 ¼ . . . ¼ u34 ¼ 0; u41 ¼ ; u42 ¼ u43 ¼ u44 ¼ 0
Ld

1 1
u51 ¼ 0; u52 ¼ ; u53 ¼  ; u ¼ 0; u61 ¼ u62 ¼ u63 ¼ 0; u64
Cp  Lp CI  Lp 54
Rload
¼
Lc

We consider
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 501

0 1
i Cc
B C
0 1 0 1 B i Ld C
u11 ... u14 i11 . . . i16 B C
B C
B .. .. .. C ! e; B .. .. .. C B iLp C
@ . . . A @ . . . A  B C0
B y2 C
u61  u64 i61    i66 B C
By C
@ 3A
iLc
0 1 0 1
i11 . . . i16 i11 ... i16
B .. .. .. C B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A ; det(A  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) det@ . . . A¼0
i61    i66 i61  i66

To effectively apply the stability criterion of Lipunov to our system, we require a


criterion for when the equation detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 has a zero in the left half plane,
without calculating the eigenvalues explicitly. We use criterion of Routh-Hurwitz
[2–4].

Exercises

1. We have amplifier system which contains BJT transistor amplifier. The amplifier
is operated as a Small Signal Amplifier. We represent our BJT transistor by
Hybrid Pi model of BJT. Our amplifier input and output matching networks are
T-type. Amplifier’s load is represented by parallel resistor (Rload) and capacitor
(Cload). We feed the amplifier by input RF source.
1:1 Draw our amplifier system by using BJT transistor linear Hybrid Pi model,
input and output block capacitors, input and output T-type matching net-
works, amplifier load circuit and input RF source.
1:2 Write our amplifier system differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability. Remark: We consider input RF source Xs ðtÞ ¼
A0 þ nðtÞ; jnðtÞj\1&A0 [ [ jnðtÞj then Xs ðtÞjA0 [ [ jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ  A0 ;
dXs ðtÞjA [ [ jnðtÞj
0
dt¼ dnðtÞ
dt ! e.
1:3 How our amplifier system stability and dynamical behavior change if the
input matching network is T-type and output matching network is Pi-type?
1:4 We change our amplifier load circuit to parallel resistor (Rload) and induc-
tance (Lload). How the dynamical behavior and stability of the circuit
change? Find fixed points.
2. We have amplifier system which contains two BJT transistors amplifiers in
cascade. The amplifiers are operated as a Small Signal Amplifiers. We represent
our BJT transistors by two Hybrid Pi model of BJTs. Our first amplifier input
502 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

and output matching networks are Pi-type and second amplifier input and output
matching networks are T-type. Last amplifier’s load is represented by parallel
inductance (Lload) and capacitor (Cload). We feed the two amplifiers by input RF
source.
2:1 Draw our amplifiers system by using BJT transistors linear Hybrid Pi
models, input and output block capacitors, first and second amplifiers
matching networks, last amplifier load circuit and input RF source.
2:2 Write our amplifiers system differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability. Remark: We consider first amplifier circuit input RF source
Xs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; ; jnðtÞj\1 & A0 [ [ jnðtÞj then
dXs ðtÞj
Xs ðtÞjA0 [ [ jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ  A0 ; A0 [ [ jnðtÞj
dt ¼ dnðtÞ
dt ! e
2:3 How our amplifier system stability and dynamical behavior change if the
load is pure resistive (Rload)?
2:4 How our amplifier system stability and dynamical behavior change if all
input and output matching networks are L-type?

3. We have Small Signal (SS) amplifier with PI and T’s matching networks
equivalent circuit. Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions, we replace the
BJT transistor with linear Hybrid PI model. Input matching network constructed
from two Pi-type matching networks in cascade. Output matching network can
be L-type (switch S1 position A) or PI-type (switch S1 position B).
Exercises 503

3:1 Switch S1 is in (A) position, Find circuit differential equations and fixed
points. Discuss stability of the circuit.
3:2 Switch S2 is in (B) position, Find circuit differential equations and fixed
point s. Discuss stability of the circuit.
3:3 Capacitors Ca11 and Ca12 are disconnected. How the circuit dynamical
behavior and stability is changed?
3:4 Capacitor Cm is a function of Ca11 and Ca12. Cm ¼ Ca11  C1 þ Ca12  C2
C1 ¼ a  C2 ; C1 ; C2 ; a 2 R þ . How the dynamical behavior and stability of
the circuit change for different values of a parameter?
Remark: We consider amplifier circuit input RF source Xs ðtÞ ¼
A0 þ nðtÞ; jnðtÞj\1 & A0  jnðtÞj then
dXs ðtÞjA [ [ jnðtÞj
Xs ðtÞjA0 [ [ jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ  A0 ; 0
dt ¼ dnðtÞ
dt ! e

4. We have balanced amplifier which contains two BJT NPN transistors (Q1 and
Q2), input and output matching networks (RM1, Cc1, RM2, Cc2, RM3, Cc3, RM4,
Cc4), feedback resistor (Rf), two input RF sources (Vs1(t) and Vs2(t)), biasing
resistors (Rb1, Rc1, Rb2, Rc2), and output load (Rload)
504 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Use BJT NPN transistor’s Small Signal (SS) Hybrid Pi equivalent circuit in your
analysis.
4:1 Find circuit differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability of the
circuit.
4:2 Resistor Rm4 is disconnected, how it influences on the circuit dynamical
behavior and stability.
4:3 We short capacitors Cc2 and Cc3. How the circuit dynamical behavior and
stability is changed?
4:4. Capacitors Cc3 and Cc4 are functions of capacitors Cc1 and Cc2.

Cc3 ¼ Cc1  C1 þ Cc2  ð1  C1 Þ; Cc4 ¼ Cc1  C2 þ Cc2  ð1  C2 Þ


C1 6¼ C2 ; 0\C1 ; C2 \1; C1 ; C2 2 R þ

How the dynamical behavior and stability of the circuit change for different
values of C1 and C2 parameters?
4:5 Circuit feedback resistor (Rf) is disconnected, How the dynamical behavior
and stability of the circuit is changed?
Remarks: We consider balance amplifier circuit input RF sources Vs1 ðtÞ ¼
A01 þ n1 ðtÞ; jn1 ðtÞj\1; A01  jn1 ðtÞj then Vs1 ðtÞjA01 jn1 ðtÞj ¼ A01 þ n1 ðtÞ  A01 ;
dVs1 ðtÞjA [[ jn ðtÞj
01
dt
1
¼ dndt1 ðtÞ ! e; Vs2 ðtÞ ¼ A02 þ n2 ðtÞ; jn2 ðtÞj\1; A02  jn2 ðtÞj then
dVs2 ðtÞjA [[ jn ðtÞj dn2 ðtÞ
Vs2 ðtÞjA02 [[ jn2 ðtÞj ¼ A02 þ n2 ðtÞ  A02 ; 02
dt
2
¼ dt !e
5. We have Common Emitter (CE) and Common Base (CB) BJT transistors
amplifier circuit. Q1 is connected as CE and Q2 is connected as CB. Common
Emitter (CE) amplifier, input signal inserted at base (B) and output signal is
taken from the collector (C). The CE amplifier’s output voltage is shifted
by *180° in phase compared to CE amplifier’s input signal. Common Base
(CB) amplifier, input signal inserted at emitter (E) and output signal taken from
the collector (C). The CB amplifier can operate as a voltage amplifier for low
input impedance.
Exercises 505

We define two circuit outputs. First circuit output (Vout1) is a voltage phase shift
by 180° and second circuit output (Vout2) has no voltage phase shift. The input RF
source is Vs(t) with serial resistor Rs and is injected to Q1 base. There are three
possible loads connections to out circuit, Rload1, Rload2, and Rload. R1, R2, R3, and
R4 are circuit biasing voltage resistors. Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions,
we replace the BJT transistors (Q1 and Q2) with linear Hybrid PI model. Switches
S1 and S2 connect the loads to our circuit. In the current circuit there are no
matching networks between the circuit amplifier and loads (Rload1, Rload2, and
Rload).
5:1 Find circuit differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability of the
circuit for the cases: (1) S1 is in position A and S2 is in position A, (2) S1 is in
position A and S2 is in position B, (3) S1 and S2 are in position B, (4) S1 is in
position B and S2 in position A.
5:2 Resistor R1 is disconnected, how it influences on the circuit dynamical
behavior and stability?
5:3 We add L—matching network between output one and Rload1. Switches S1 and
S2 are in position A. Find circuit differential equations and fixed points.
Discuss stability of the circuit.
5:4 We add PI matching network between output two and Rload2. Switches S1 and
S2 are in position A. Find circuit differential equations and fixed points.
Discuss stability of the circuit.
506 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

Remarks: We consider CE and CB transistor amplifier circuit input RF sources


Vs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; jnðtÞj\1; A0  jnðtÞj then Vs ðtÞjA0 jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ  A0 ;
dVs ðtÞjA [[ jnðtÞj
0
dt ¼ dnðtÞ
dt ! e

6. We have Bias-T circuit with 4th order filter. Bias-T’s RF choke is L2 and
capacitor is C1. We consider our 4th order filter with Bias-T feed coax cable
with RF + DC signal. The coax and the remote device which is connected to the
coax cable are taken as a pure resistive load (Rload). Due to parasitic effects of
the circuit microstrip lines there are some delay elements in time in our circuit
ðs1 ; s2 ; s3 Þ. Assumptions: The voltages on the microstrip represented delay lines
are neglected Vsi ! eði ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ and the delay is in the current that flows
through each delay line IðtÞ ! Iðt  sÞ. V1—DC voltage source, V2—RF
voltage source. Tau1 $ s1 ; Tau2 $ s2 ; Tau3 $ s3

6:1 Write 4th order filter with Bias-T circuit differential Eqs.
6:2 Discuss stability and dynamical behavior of the circuit for
si ! eð¼ 0Þ 8 i ¼ 1; 2; 3. Find circuit fixed points and characteristic Eq.
6:3 Discuss stability and stability switching for si [ 0 8 i ¼ 1; 2; 3 due to dif-
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ferent values of s parameter s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s2 ; s3 ¼ s þ 1 .
6:4 How the circuit dynamical behavior changes if L3 is disconnected?
6:5 How the circuit dynamical behavior changes if we short inductor L1?
6:6. Discuss stability and stability switching for si [ 0 8(i ¼ 1; 2; 3 due )to!dif-
0 for s\s C
ferent values of s parameter s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s2 ; s3 ¼
s3 for s sC
Exercises 507

sC is a critical delay parameter value. s3 ðsÞ ¼ s3  Uðs  sC Þ. How the cir-


cuit stability and stability switching is dependent on the critical delay
parameter (sC )?

7. We have Bias-T circuit which is driving VCSEL (Vertical Cavity Surface


Emitting Laser) diode (or other laser diode). It can be done with no IC.
The VCSEL or laser diode is biased with a DC current until it just begins to lase.
An RF sine wave then applied to this laser through a Bias-T network.
The VCSEL or laser diode is biased with a DC current until it just begins to lase.
An RF sine wave is then applied to this laser through a Bias-T network. The
internal capacitance and structure of these small lasers then does something.
Instead of slowly turning ON and OFF with the application of the RF, the diode
is driven for threshold during one part of the sine wave and then begin to store
energy on the opposite swing of the wave. When it has reached a certain level of
stored energy (gain), it “snaps” on and releases all of this energy as laser light.
The laser then turns off because all of the gain was extracted. The phenomenon
is called “gain-switching”. Tuning the laser diode: if DC is too high, the laser
diode may produce light all the time. If the RF is too high, the laser diode may
produce an “after pulse”. If either is too low, the laser diode won’t produce the
desired amplitude. Due to parasitic effects of the circuit microstrip lines there are
some delay elements in time in our circuit ðs1 ; s2 Þ. Assumptions: The voltages
on the microstrip represented delay lines are neglected Vsi ! eði ¼ 1; 2Þ and the
delay is in the current that flows through each delay line IðtÞ ! Iðt  sÞ.

7:1 Write VCSEL diode driving Bias-T circuit differential equations. Take into
consideration in your differential equations the full equivalent circuit of
VCSEL diode.
508 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

7:2 Discuss stability and dynamical behavior for the circuit si ¼ 0; i ¼ 1; 2.


7:3 Discuss stability and stability switching for si 6¼ 0; si [ 0 8 i ¼ 1; 2 due to
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
different values of s parameter s1 ¼ s2 ; s2 ¼ s þ s2 þ C  s; C 2 R . How
the stability changes for different values of C parameter (s is constant)?
7:4 Discuss stability and stability switching
( for si [ 0 8 i ¼ 1; 2 due)to!different
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s þ 1 for 0 \s\sC
values of s parameter s1 ¼ s4 ; s2 ¼ . sC is a
s3 for s sC
critical delay parameter value. How the circuit stability and stability
switching is dependent on the critical delay parameter (sC )? s2 ðsÞ ¼
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ð s þ 1Þ  ½UðsÞ  Uðs  sC Þ þ s3  Uðs  sC Þ

Cp—pad capacitance, Li—inductance of interconnect metal, Rm—resistance


from mirror stack, Ca—aperture capacitance, Ra—aperture resistance.

8. We have SPST (Single Pole Single Throw) PIN diode circuit. The output RF
port is connected to load resistance (Rload). We consider the RF source as a high
frequency signal and use PIN diode high frequency equivalent circuit. Consider
dVs ðtÞ
dt ! e
Exercises 509

8:1 Draw PIN diode SPST circuit equivalent circuit.


8:2 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
8:3 Find circuit eigenvalues expressions and discuss stability switching for
parameter values variation.
8:4 We replace inductor Ld by resistor Rd. How the circuit dynamic changes?
Find circuit differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
8:5 We add PIN diode D2 in parallel to D1. How the circuit dynamical behavior
changes? Find circuit differential equations and fixed point. Discuss
stability.

9. We have SPST with series and shunt PIN didoes (D1 and D2). The output RF
port is connected to load resistance (Rload). We consider the RF source as a high
frequency signal and use PIN diode high frequency equivalent circuit. Consider
dVs ðtÞ
dt ! e.
510 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …

9:1 Draw PIN diodes (D1 and D2) SPST circuit equivalent circuit.
9:2 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
9:3 Find circuit eigenvalues expressions and discuss stability switching for
parameters variation.
9:4 Inductor Ls is disconnected, How the circuit dynamic changes? Find circuit
differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
9:5 We disconnect diode D2, How the circuit dynamic changes? Find circuit
differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.

10. We have high isolation generic PIN SPST circuit. PIN diode switches can
handle very large power signals. The important diode parameters for switches
that must handle power levels higher than 1 w include the diode’s voltage
rating and thermal resistance. Other diode parameters, such as series resistance,
capacitance and I layer thickness, are also contributing factors to the determi-
nation of maximum power handling. We inject the RF signal (Vs(t)) through
circuit RF common port and can switch it to RF Out1 or RF Out1. We have two
bias voltage sources to our circuit (Vss1 and Vss2). Circuit RF chokes are Ld1,
Ld2, and Ld3. Three Cblock capacitors (Cb1, Cb2, and Cb3). Two Cfilter capacitors
(Cf1 and Cf2). Two PIN diodes are low capacitance and the other two PIN
diodes are low resistance. Rload1 and Rload2 are our circuit’s load resistances.
We consider for simplicity dVdts ðtÞ ! e. Circuit PIN diodes parameters are not the
Exercises 511

same and there is slightly differences. Use PIN diode high frequency equivalent
circuit in your analysis.

Ld ¼ Ld1 ; Ld2 ¼ C1  Ld1 ; Ld3 ¼ ð1  C1 Þ  Ld1 ; 0\C1 \1; Cf


¼ Cf 1 ; Cf 2 ¼ ð1  C2 Þ  Cf 1 ; 0\C2 \1

10:1 Draw PIN diodes (D1,…,D4) SPST circuit equivalent circuit.


10:2 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
10:3 Find circuit eigenvalues expressions and discuss stability switching for
parameters C1, C2 variation.
10:4 Diode D2 is disconnected, how the dynamical of the circuit is changes?
Find circuit differential equations and discuss stability.
10:5 We short diode D3, how the dynamical of the circuit is changed? Find
circuit differential equations and discuss stability.
10:6 We short Rload2, How the dynamical of the circuit is changed? Discuss
stability switching for parameters C1, C2 variations.
10:7 We disconnect Cfilter capacitors, How the dynamical of the circuit is
changed? Discuss stability switching for circuit parameters variations.
Chapter 5
Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability
Analysis

Generally, large signal or Power Amplifier (PA) are used in the output stages of
audio amplifier systems to derive a loudspeaker load. Power amplifier must be able
to supply the high peak currents required to drive the low impedance speaker. One
method used to distinguish the electrical characteristics of different types of
amplifiers is by “class”, and as such amplifiers are classified according to their
circuit configuration and method of operation. Then Amplifier Classes is the term
used to differentiate between the different amplifier types. Amplifier Classes rep-
resent the amount of the output signal which varies within the amplifier circuit over
one cycle of operation when excited by a sinusoidal input signal. The classification
of amplifiers range from entirely linear operation (for use in high-fidelity signal
amplification) with very low efficiency, to entirely non-linear (where a faithful
signal reproduction is not so important) operation but with a much higher effi-
ciency, while others are a compromise between the two. Amplifier classes are
mainly lumped into two basic groups. The first are the classically controlled con-
duction angle amplifiers forming the more common amplifier classes of A, B, AB
and C, which are defined by the length of their conduction state over some portion
of the output waveform, such that the output stage transistor operation lies some-
where between being “fully-ON” and “fully-OFF”. The second set of amplifiers are
the newer so-called “switching” amplifier classes of D, E, F, G, S, T etc., which use
digital circuits and pulse width modulation (PWM) to constantly switch the signal
between “fully-ON” and “fully-OFF” driving the output hard into the transistors
saturation and cut-off regions. The most commonly constructed amplifier classes are
those that are used as audio amplifiers, mainly class A, B, AB and C. Class A
Amplifiers are the most common type of amplifier class due mainly to their simple
design. Class A, literally means “the best class” of amplifier due mainly to their low
signal distortion levels and are probably the best sounding of all the amplifier
classes mentioned here. The class A amplifier has the highest linearity over the
other amplifier classes and as such operates in the linear portion of the character-
istics curve. Class B amplifiers were invented as a solution to the efficiency and
heating problems associated with the previous class A amplifier. The basic class B
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 513
O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_5
514 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

amplifier uses two complimentary transistors either bipolar of FET for each half of
the waveform with its output stage configured in a “push-pull” type arrangement, so
that each transistor device amplifies only half of the output waveform. Class AB
Amplifier is a combination of the “Class A” and the “Class B” type amplifiers.
The AB classification of amplifier is currently one of the most common used types
of audio power amplifier design. The class AB amplifier is a variation of a class B
amplifier, except that both devices are allowed to conduct at the same time around
the waveforms crossover point eliminating the crossover distortion problems of the
previous class B amplifier. The Class C Amplifier design has the greatest efficiency
but the poorest linearity of the classes of amplifiers mentioned here. The previous
classes, A, B and AB are considered linear amplifiers, as the output signals
amplitude and phase are linearly related to the input signals amplitude and phase.
Class C amplifier is heavily biased so that the output current is zero for more than
one half of an input sinusoidal signal cycle with the transistor idling at its cut-off
point. The conduction angle for the transistor is significantly less than 180°, and is
generally around the 90° area. We analyse the stability of these amplifiers by
inspecting the equivalent circuit differential equations, fixed points, bifurcation and
stability switching for circuit parameters variation. BJT transistor is replaced by
large signal model in our analysis.
We use in our analysis the Bipolar transistor model for large signal circuit
simulation: The BJT model used in circuit simulation can accurately represent the
DC and dynamic currents of the transistor in response to VBE(t) and VCE(t).
A typical circuit simulation model or compact model is made of the Ebers-Moll
model when VBE and VBC are two driving forces for IC and IB, plus additional
enhancements for high level injection, voltage dependent capacitances that accu-
rately represent the charge storage in the transistor, and parasitic resistances.
This BJT model is known as the Gummel-Poon model. The Ebers-Moll BJT model
is a good large signal. if the inputs/outputs exceed certain limits, the full Ebers-Moll
model must be used. When certain parameters are omitted, the Gummel–Poon
model reduces to the simpler Ebers–Moll model. Gummel-Poon nonlinear model is
the “large signal model”. Large signal models is closer to reality but is computa-
tionally complex or even intractable. Additionally we discuss the stability of
wideband LNA with negative feedback.

5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power Amplifiers Stability


Analysis Under Parameters Variation

Class AB Amplifier is a combination of the “Class A” and the “Class B” type


amplifiers. The AB classification of amplifier is currently one of the most common
used types of audio power amplifier design. Push-pull mechanism is essential for
realizing practical class AB power amplifiers. Circuit diagram of a typical class AB
push-pull amplifier is shown in the next figure. The technical designation is
5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power … 515

“complementary symmetry class AB power amplifier”. The active elements used in


this circuit (Q1 and Q2) are complementary symmetric transistors and it means the
transistors are similar in all aspects except one is NPN and the other is PNP. The
use of this complementary pair eliminates the bulky transformer for phase splitting
the input signal for driving the individual transistor. The NPN transistor alone will
conduct the positive half cycle and PNP transistor alone will conduct the negative
half cycle. Pre-biasing is given to the transistors using the network comprising of
resistors R1, R2 and biasing diodes D1 and D2. The NPN transistor will start
conducting when its base voltage is above the base emitter voltage (VBE  0.7 v)
and a PNP transistor will start conducting when its base voltage is below the base
emitter voltage (VBE  −0.7 v). A forward biased diode will drop approximately
0.7 v across it and the biasing diodes used here will keep the transistor slightly
forward biased even if there is no input signal. Compensating diodes (D1, D2)
characteristics must match as close as possible to the transistors. Resistors R1 and
R2 are used for forward biasing the diodes and they drop 0.7 v across it for biasing
the individual transistors (Q1, Q2). C1 and C2 are input DC decoupling capacitors.
The advantages of class AB power amplifier: no cross over distortion, no need for
the bulky coupling transformers, and no hum in the output. The disadvantages of
class AB power amplifier: efficiency is slightly less when compared to class B
configuration, there will be some DC components in the output as the load is
directly coupled, and capacitive coupling can eliminate DC components but it is not
practical in case of heavy loads. For simplicity in our circuit analysis we reduces
BJT transistors Gummel–Poon model to the simpler Ebers–Moll model [24–26]
(Fig. 5.1).

Fig. 5.1 Class AB push-pull amplifier


516 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

VBEQ VBCQ VBEQ VBCQ


Is 1 1 1 Is 1
IEQ1 ¼  ðe VT  1Þ  Is  ðe VT  1Þ; ICQ1 ¼ Is  ðe VT  1Þ   ðe VT  1Þ
af ar
VBEQ VBCQ VEBQ VCBQ
Is 1 Is 1 Is 2 2
IBQ1 ¼  ðe VT  1Þ þ  ðe VT  1Þ; IEQ2 ¼  ðe VT  1Þ  Is  ðe VT  1Þ
bf br af
VEBQ VCBQ VEBQ VCBQ
2 Is 2 Is 2 Is 2
ICQ2 ¼ Is  ðe VT  1Þ   ðe VT  1Þ; IBQ2 ¼  ðe VT  1Þ þ  ðe VT  1Þ
ar bf br
ID ID
VD1 ¼ Vt  lnð 1 þ 1Þ; VD2 ¼ Vt  lnð 2 þ 1Þ; ID ¼ ID1 ¼ ID2 ; IEQ1 ¼ IRload þ IEQ2
I0 I0

It can be shown that aF  ISE ¼ aR  ISC ¼ IS (see S.M. Sze, Physics of


Semiconductor Devices) (Fig. 5.2).

Fig. 5.2 Class AB push-pull amplifier equivalent circuit


5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power … 517

Vcc  VB1 VB d
ICQ1 þ IBQ1 ¼ IEQ1 ; IEQ2 ¼ ICQ2 þ IBQ2 ; IR1 ¼ ; IR2 ¼ 2 ; IC1 ¼ C1  ðVA1  VB1 Þ
R1 R2 dt
d Isc
IC2 ¼ C2  ðVA1  VB2 Þ; IRs ¼ IC1 þ IC2 ; IR1 þ IC1 ¼ IBQ1 þ ID1 ¼ IBQ1 þ ID ; lnð Þ  0
dt Ise
V A3 Vs ðtÞ  VA1
ID2 þ IC2 þ IBQ2 ¼ IR2 ; IRload ¼ ; VECQ2 ¼ VA3 ; VCEQ1 þ VECQ2 ¼ Vcc ; IRs ¼
Rload Rs

Collector emitter voltage expression for BJT NPN and PNP transistor

½ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


VCENPN  VT  lnf g;
½IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
VCEPNP  VT  lnf g
ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise

we can write the following circuit collector emitter equations for Q1 and Q2:

½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


VCEQ1  VT  lnf g;
½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
ICQ  af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
VCEQ2  VT  lnf 2 g
ar  ICQ2  IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
ar  ICQ2  IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
VECQ2 ¼ VCEQ2 ; VECQ2  VT  lnf g;
ICQ2  af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
VCEQ1 þ VECQ2 ¼ Vcc

½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


VT  lnf g
½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
ar  ICQ2  IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
þ VT  lnf g ¼ Vcc
ICQ2  af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc

We can rewrite transistors collector and emitter currents:

ICQ1 ¼ bf  IBQ1 þ ðbf þ 1Þ  ICBQ1 0 ; IEQ1 ¼ ðbf þ 1Þ  IBQ1 þ ðbf þ 1Þ  ICBQ1 0


ICQ2 ¼ bf  IBQ2 þ ðbf þ 1Þ  ICBQ2 0 ; IEQ2 ¼ ðbf þ 1Þ  IBQ2 þ ðbf þ 1Þ  ICBQ2 0

Remark Q1 and Q2 are complementary symmetric transistors and it means the


transistors are similar in all aspects (parameters are the same, βf, αf,…) except one is
NPN and the other is PNP.
518 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

af bf
bf : 20 ! 500; bf ¼ ; af ¼ ; af : 0:95 ! 0:99; bf [ br
1  af 1 þ bf
ar br
br : 0 ! 20; br ¼ ; ar ¼ ; ar : 0 ! 0:95; af [ ar
1  ar 1 þ br

IEQ1
IEQ1 ¼ ðbf þ 1Þ  IBQ1 þ ðbf þ 1Þ  ICBQ1 0 ; IBQ1 ¼  ICBQ1 0
ðbf þ 1Þ
IEQ2
IEQ2 ¼ ðbf þ 1Þ  IBQ2 þ ðbf þ 1Þ  ICBQ2 0 ; IBQ2 ¼  ICBQ2 0
ðbf þ 1Þ
bf  IEQ1 bf  IEQ2
ICQ1 ¼ þ ICBQ1 0 ; ICQ2 ¼ þ ICBQ2 0
ðbf þ 1Þ ðbf þ 1Þ

Vcc  VB1 VB
IR1 ¼ ) IR1  R1 ¼ Vcc  VB1 ; VB1 ¼ Vcc  IR1  R1 ; IR2 ¼ 2 ) VB2
R1 R2
¼ IR2  R2
Z
d 1
IC1 ¼ C1  ðVA1  VB1 Þ ) VA1  VB1 ¼  IC1  dt;
dt C1
Z
1
VA1 ¼ VB1 þ  IC1  dt
C1
Z Z
d 1 1
IC1 ¼ C1  ðVA1  VB1 Þ ) VA1  VB1 ¼  IC1  dt; VA1 ¼ VB1 þ  IC1  dt
dt C1 C1
Z Z
d 1 1
IC2 ¼ C2  ðVA1  VB2 Þ ) VA1  VB2 ¼  IC2  dt; VA1 ¼ VB2 þ  IC2  dt
dt C2 C2
Z Z
1 1
VB 1 þ  IC1  dt ¼ VB2 þ  IC2  dt;
C1 C2
Z Z
1 1
Vcc  IR1  R1 þ  IC1  dt ¼ IR2  R2 þ  IC2  dt
C1 C2
Z Z
d 1 d 1
fVcc  IR1  R1 þ  IC1  dtg ¼ fIR  R2 þ  IC2  dtg
dt C1 dt 2 C2

dVcc dIR1 1 dIR2 1 dVcc


  R1 þ  I C1 ¼  R2 þ  I C2 ; !e
dt dt C1 dt C2 dt
dIR1 dIR2
We get the equation:  dt  R1 þ 1
C1  I C1 ¼ dt  R2 þ 1
C2  I C2

VA3
IRload ¼ ) VA3 ¼ IRload  Rload ; VA3 ¼ VECQ2
Rload
ar  ICQ2  IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
¼ VT  lnf g
ICQ2  af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power … 519

VT ar  ICQ2  IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise


IRload ¼  lnf g;
Rload ICQ2  af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
ID
Vcc ¼ IR1  R1 þ 2  lnð þ 1Þ þ IR2  R2
I0
VBEQ VBCQ
Is 1 1
IEQ1 ¼ IRload þ IEQ2 )  ðe VT  1Þ  Is  ðe VT  1Þ
af
VEBQ VCBQ
Is 2 2
¼ IRload þ  ðe VT  1Þ  Is  ðe VT  1Þ
af

IR1 þ IC1 ¼ IBQ1 þ ID ) IR1 ¼ IBQ1 þ ID  IC1 ; IR2 ¼ ID þ IC2 þ IBQ2

We add one equation to the other and get the following expression:

ðÞ IR1 ¼ IBQ1 þ ID  IC1 ; ðÞ IR2 ¼ ID þ IC2 þ IBQ2 ; ðÞ þ ðÞ ) IR1 þ IR2
¼ IBQ1 þ IBQ2 þ IC2  IC1 þ 2  ID

dIR1 1 dIR2 1 dIR dIR2


  R1 þ  I C1 ¼  R2 þ  IC2 ) ð 1  R1 þ  R2 Þ
dt C1 dt C2 dt dt
1 1
¼  I C2   I C1
C2 C1
dIR1 dIR2
If C = C1 = C2 then ð dt  R1 þ dt  R2 Þ ¼ C1  ðIC2  IC1 Þ

IR1 þ IR2 ¼ IBQ1 þ IBQ2 þ IC2  IC1 þ 2  ID ) IC2  IC1


¼ IR1 þ IR2  ðIBQ1 þ IBQ2 Þ  2  ID

X
2 X
2
dIR1 dIR2
I C2  I C1 ¼ IR k  IBQk  2  ID ; ð  R1 þ  R2 Þ
k¼1 k¼1
dt dt
1 X 2 X2
¼ ð IRk  IBQk  2  ID Þ
C k¼1 k¼1

ID
Vcc ¼ IR1  R1 þ 2  lnð þ 1Þ þ IR2  R2 ;
I0
1
ID ¼ I0  fexp½ ðVcc  IR1  R1  IR2  R2 Þ  1g
2
dIR1 dIR2 1 X 2 X 2
ð  R1 þ  R2 Þ ¼  ð IRk  IBQk  2  I0
dt dt C k¼1 k¼1
1
 fexp½ ðVcc  IR1  R1  IR2  R2 Þ  1gÞ
2
520 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

VT ar  ICQ2  IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise


IRload ¼ IEQ1  IEQ2 ; IRload ¼  lnf g
Rload ICQ2  af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc

VT ar  ICQ2  IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise


IEQ1  IEQ2 ¼  lnf g
Rload ICQ2  af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
b I
VT ar  ½ðbf þEQ1Þ2 þ ICBQ2 0   IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
IEQ1  IEQ2 ¼  lnf b IEQ f g;
Rload f 2
þ ICBQ 0  af  IEQ þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
ðbf þ 1Þ 2 2

VCEQ1 þ VECQ2 ¼ Vcc

b I
VT ar  ½ðbf þEQ1Þ2 þ ICBQ2 0   IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
n1 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼  lnf b IEQ f g
Rload f 2
þ ICBQ 0  af  IEQ þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
ðbf þ 1Þ 2 2

 IEQ1 þ IEQ2 ¼ 0

½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


VT  lnf g
½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
ar  ICQ2  IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
þ VT  lnf g ¼ Vcc
ICQ2  af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
b IEQ1
ar  ½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0   IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
f þ 1Þ
lnf b I
g
½ðbf þEQ1Þ1 þ ICBQ1 0   af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
f
b IEQ2
ar  ½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0   IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise Vcc
f þ 1Þ
þ lnf b I

½ðbf þEQ1Þ2 þ ICBQ2 0   af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc VT
f

b IEQ1
ar  ½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0   IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
f þ 1Þ
ln½f b I
g
½ðbf þEQ1Þ1 þ ICBQ1 0   af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
f
b IEQ2
ar  ½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0   IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise Vcc
f þ 1Þ
f b I
g ¼
½ðbf þEQ1Þ2 þ ICBQ2 0   af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc VT
f

b IEQ1
ar  ½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0   IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
½VVcc  f þ 1Þ
e T ¼f b I
g
½ðbf þEQ1Þ1 þ ICBQ1 0   af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
f
b IEQ2
ar  ½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0   IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
f þ 1Þ
f b I
g
½ðbf þEQ1Þ2 þ ICBQ2 0   af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
f
5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power … 521

b IEQ1
ar  ½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0   IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
f þ 1Þ
n2 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ f b I
g
½ðbf þEQ1Þ1 þ ICBQ1 0   af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
f
b IEQ2
ar  ½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0   IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
f þ 1Þ
f b I
g;
½ðbf þEQ1Þ2 þ ICBQ2 0   af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
f

n2 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ e½ VT 
Vcc

We need to solve the following two equations:

½Vcc 
n1 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ 0; n2 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ e VT

Assumptions: ar : 0 ! 0:95; ar ¼ 0:95  1; bf : 20 ! 500; bf  1 ) bf þ 1  bf

bf bf
 1; af : 0:95 ! 0:99; af  1; ð  af Þ ! e ! 0; X ðar ; bf Þ
ðbf þ 1Þ ðbf þ 1Þ
ar  bf
¼ 1
ðbf þ 1Þ

a b
VT ððb r þ f1Þ  1Þ  IEQ2 þ ar  ICBQ2 0 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
n1 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼  lnf f b g
Rload ð f  af Þ  IEQ þ ICBQ 0 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
ðbf þ 1Þ 2 2

 IEQ1 þ IEQ2 ¼ 0

a b
VT ððb r þ f1Þ  1Þ  IEQ2 þ ar  ICBQ2 0 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
n1 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼  lnf f g
Rload ICBQ2 0 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
 IEQ1 þ IEQ2 ¼ 0

C1 ðar ; af ; Ise ; ICBQ2 0 Þ ¼ ar  ICBQ2 0 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise ; C2 ðar ; af ; Isc ; ICBQ2 0 Þ


¼ ICBQ2 0 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc

VT Xðar ; bf Þ  IEQ2 þ C1 ðar ; af ; Ise ; ICBQ2 0 Þ


n1 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼  lnf g  IEQ1 þ IEQ2
Rload C2 ðar ; af ; Isc ; ICBQ2 0 Þ
¼0

Xðar ; bf Þ  IEQ2 þ C1 ðar ; af ; Ise ; ICBQ2 0 Þ Rload


lnf g ¼ ðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ 
C2 ðar ; af ; Isc ; ICBQ2 0 Þ VT

Rload Xðar ; bf Þ  IEQ2 þ C1 ðar ; af ; Ise ; ICBQ2 0 Þ


expfðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ  g¼
VT C2 ðar ; af ; Isc ; ICBQ2 0 Þ
522 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

Rnload
X1 ðIEQ  IEQ Þn 
Rload 1 2 VTn
expfðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ  g¼
VT n¼0
n!
R2load R3load
Rload ðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ2  VT2
ðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ3  VT3
¼ 1 þ ðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ  þ þ þ 
VT 2 6

R2load
Rload Rload ðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ2  VT2
expfðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ  g  1 þ ðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ  þ
VT VT 2

C1 ¼ C1 ðar ; af ; Ise ; ICBQ2 0 Þ; C2 ¼ C2 ðar ; af ; Isc ; ICBQ2 0 Þ; X ¼ Xðar ; bf Þ

R2
Rload ðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ2  Vload
2
1 þ ðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ  þ T

VT 2
Xðar ; bf Þ  IEQ2 þ C1 ðar ; af ; Ise ; ICBQ2 0 Þ

C2 ðar ; af ; Isc ; ICBQ2 0 Þ

R2
ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ2 load
V2
ðÞ 1 þ ðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ  Rload
VT þ 2
T
 CX2  IEQ2 þ C1
C2

b IEQ1
ar  ½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0   IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
f þ 1Þ
n2 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ f b IEQ1
g
½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0   af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
f þ 1Þ
b IEQ2
ar  ½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0   IEQ2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
f þ 1Þ
f b IEQ2
g;
½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0   af  IEQ2 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
f þ 1Þ

n2 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ e½ VT 
Vcc

bf
ðar  ðb þ 1Þ  1Þ  IEQ1 þ ar  ICBQ1 0 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
f bf
f
g
ððb þ 1Þ  af Þ  IEQ1 þ ICBQ1 0 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
f
bf
ðar  ðb þ 1Þ  1Þ  IEQ2 þ ar  ICBQ2 0 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
¼ e½ VT 
Vcc
f f
bf
g
ððb þ 1Þ  af Þ  IEQ2 þ ICBQ2 0 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
f

Assumptions:
bf bf
ððb þ 1Þ  af Þ ! e; X ¼ ar  ðb þ 1Þ  1; C3 ¼ ar  ICBQ1 0 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
f f

C4 ¼ ICBQ1 0 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc ; C1 ¼ ar  ICBQ2 0 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise ;


C2 ¼ ICBQ2 0 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power … 523

ðÞ ðXIEQ1 þ C3 Þ  ðXIEQ2 þ C1 Þ ¼ e½VVccT 


C4 C2

We can summary our intermediate results:


R2
ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ2  load
V2
ðÞ 1 þ ðIEQ1  IEQ2 Þ  RVload þ 2
T
 CX2  IEQ2 þ C1
C2
T
ðÞ XIEQ1 þ C3 XIEQ2 þ C1
ð C4 Þ  ð C2 Þ ¼ e½ VT 
Vcc

1 C4  C2  e½ VT 
Vcc

IEQ1 ¼ ð  C3 Þ
X X  IEQ2 þ C1

1 C4  C2  e½ VT 
Vcc
Rload
1þð  ð  C3 Þ  IEQ2 Þ 
X X  IEQ2 þ C1 VT
V
½ cc 
2 e T
R2load
ðX1  ðCXI4 C
V

EQ þ C1
 C3 Þ  IEQ2 Þ2  VT2 X C1
þ 2
  IEQ2 þ
2 C2 C2

C4  C2  Rload  e½ VT  C4  C2  e½ VT 
Vcc Vcc
Rload C3  Rload
 IEQ2  þ1  þ ð½ 2  IEQ2 2
X  VT  IEQ2 þ X  C1  VT
2 VT X  VT X  IEQ2 þ X  C1
C4  C2  e½ VT 
Vcc
C3 C3 R2 X C1
þ ½ 2  2  ½ 2  IEQ2 Þ  load2   IEQ2 þ
X X X  IEQ2 þ X  C1 2  VT C 2 C2

C4  C2  Rload  e½ VT 
Vcc
Rload C3  Rload
 IEQ2  þ1 
X2  VT  IEQ2 þ X  C1  VT VT X  VT
C24  C22  e2½ VT  C4  C2  e½ VT 
Vcc Vcc

þð þ IEQ
2
2  IEQ2
½X2  IEQ2 þ X  C1 2 2
½X2  IEQ2 þ X  C1 
½Vcc 
C3 C3 C4  C2  e VT R2 X C1
þ ½ 2  2  ½ 2  IEQ2 Þ  load2   IEQ2 þ
X X X  IEQ2 þ X  C1 2  VT C2 C2
524 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

C4  C2  Rload  e½ VT 
Vcc
Rload C3  Rload
 IEQ2  þ1 
X  VT  IEQ2 þ X  C1  VT
2 V T X  VT
C24  C22  e2½ VT   2V C4  C2  e½ VT   2V
Vcc
R2
load load
Vcc
R2
2 R2load 2
þ T
þ IEQ
2
 2 2 T
 IEQ2
½X2  IEQ2 þ X  C1 2 2
2  VT2 ½X  IEQ2 þ X  C1 
½Vcc  R2
C3 C4  C2  e T  2VT2
load
C3 X C1
V
R2 R2
þ ½ 2  load2  2  ½ 2  IEQ2  load2    IEQ2 þ
X 2  VT X X  IEQ2 þ X  C1 2  VT C2 C2

C4  C2  Rload  e½ VT 
Vcc
C3 R2load Rload X R2
þ IEQ2  ½2      þ IEQ
2
 load2
X  VT  IEQ2 þ X  C1  VT
2 X 2  VT 2 VT C2 2
2  VT
C24  C22  e2½ VT   2V ½V 
Vcc
R2 Vcc
R2
C3 C4  C2  e T  2VT2
load load
2
þ 2  2   ð T
Þ
½X  IEQ2 þ X  C1 2 X X2  IEQ2 þ X  C1
½Vcc  R2
C4  C2  e VT  2V
load
2 C1 C3 R2 C3  Rload
2 T
 IEQ2   ½ 2  load2 þ 1
½X  IEQ2 þ X  C1 
2 C2 X 2  VT X  VT

The above equation can be solve numerically and we get some options for IEQ2
values. We ignore complex and negative values [33].

C1 C3 R2 C3  Rload
w1 ðIEQ2 Þ   ½ 2  load2 þ  1;
C2 X 2  VT X  VT
IEQ2 ¼ fn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .

½Vcc 
1 C4  C2  e VT
IEQ1 ¼ ð  C3 Þ;
X X  fn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ þ C1
IEQ1 ¼ gn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ

Summary: We get some options for IEQ1 ; IEQ2 values, and ignore negative and
complex results.
IEQ1 ¼ gn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ;
IEQ2 ¼ fn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .

Back to our previous differential equation:

dIR1 dIR2 1 X 2 X2
ð  R1 þ  R2 Þ ¼  ð IRk  IBQk  2  I0
dt dt C k¼1 k¼1
1
 fexp½ ðVcc  IR1  R1  IR2  R2 Þ  1gÞ
2
5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power … 525

We consider R1  R2 and R ¼ R2 ; R ¼ R1 then we can write the above circuit


differential equation:

dIR1 dIR2 1 X 2 X2
1 X2
ð þ ÞR¼ ð IRk  IBQk  2  I0  fexp½ ðVcc  R  IRk Þ
dt dt C k¼1 k¼1
2 k¼1
 1gÞ

We define new variable

X
2
dX X 2
dIRk
X¼ IRk ; ¼
k¼1
dt k¼1
dt

IEQ1 gn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ


IBQ1 ¼  ICBQ1 0 ¼  ICBQ1 0
ðbf þ 1Þ ðbf þ 1Þ

IEQ2 fn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ


IBQ2 ¼  ICBQ2 0 ¼  ICBQ2 0
ðbf þ 1Þ ðbf þ 1Þ

X
2
gn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ fn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ
IBQk ¼ þ
k¼1
ðbf þ 1Þ ðbf þ 1Þ
X2
 ICBQk 0
k¼1

gn ¼ gn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ; fn ¼ fn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ

X
2
gn þ f n X
2
IBQk ¼  ICBQk 0 ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .
k¼1
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1

X
2
dIR 1 X 2
gn þ f n X2
R k
¼ ð IR k  þ ICBQk 0  2  I0
k¼1
dt C k¼1 ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1

1 X2
 fexp½ ðVcc  R  IRk Þ  1gÞ
2 k¼1

dX 1 gn þ f n X2
1
¼  ðX  þ ICBQk 0  2  I0  fexp½ ðVcc  R  XÞ  1gÞ
dt CR ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
2

The first stage is to find our circuit fixed point: dX


dt ¼0
526 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

gn þ fn X2
1
X ðjÞ  þ ICBQk 0  2  I0  fexp½ ðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ  1g ¼ 0;
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
2
j ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .

1 gn þ fn X
2
X ðjÞ  2  I0  fexp½ ðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ  1g ¼  ICBQk 0
2 ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1

1 gn þ fn X
2
X ðjÞ  2  I0  fexp½ ðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ  1g ¼  ICBQk 0
2 ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
X1 1 ðjÞ n
1 2n  ðVcc  R  X Þ
exp½  ðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ ¼
2 n¼0
n!
1 1
¼ 1þ  ðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ þ  ðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ2 þ   
2 8
1 1 1
exp½  ðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ  1 þ  ðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ þ  ðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ2
2 2 8

1 gn þ f n X
2
X ðjÞ  I0  fðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ þ  ðVcc  R  X ðjÞ Þ2 g ¼  ICBQk 0
4 ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1

1
ð1 þ I0  RÞ  X ðjÞ  I0  Vcc   I0  ½Vcc
2
 2  Vcc  R  X ðjÞ þ R2  ½X ðjÞ 2 
4
gn þ fn X2
¼  ICBQk 0
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1

1 1
 I0  R2  ½X ðjÞ 2  ð1 þ I0  R þ  I0  Vcc  RÞ  X ðjÞ
4 2
1 gn þ f n X
2
þ ½I0  Vcc þ  I0  Vcc 2
þ  ICBQk 0  ¼ 0
4 ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
u 1 2
u ð1 þ I0  R þ  I0  Vcc  RÞ
u 2
ð1 þ I0  R þ 12  I0  Vcc  RÞ  u
u X
t  I0  R2  ½I0  Vcc þ 1  I0  V 2 þ gn þ fn 
2
ICBQk 0 
4 cc
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
X ðjÞ ¼ 1
2  I0  R2

We get two groups of fixed points for our circuit: gn ; fn 2 R þ ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .


5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power … 527

vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
u 1 2
u ð1 þ I0  R þ  I0  Vcc  RÞ
u 2
u
ð1 þ I0  R þ 2  I0  Vcc  RÞ þ u
1
X
t  I0  R2  ½I0  Vcc þ 1  I0  V 2 þ gn þ fn 
2
ICBQk 0 
4 cc
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
ðjÞ
Xgroup ¼
1 1
2  I0  R2

vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
u 1 2
u ð1 þ I0  R þ  I0  Vcc  RÞ
u 2
ð1 þ I0  R þ 12  I0  Vcc  RÞ  u
u X
t  I0  R2  ½I0  Vcc þ 1  I0  V 2 þ gn þ fn 
2
ICBQk 0 
4 cc
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
ðjÞ
Xgroup ¼
2 1
2  I0  R2

We ignore in our analysis negative and complex fixed points values. We get a set
of one dimension systems dXdt ¼ nn ðXÞ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .

1 g n þ fn X2
1
nn ðXÞ ¼   ðX  þ ICBQk 0  2  I0  fexp½ ðVcc  R  XÞ  1gÞ
CR ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
2

dX 1 gn þ f n X2
1
¼  ðX  þ ICBQk 0  2  I0  fexp½ ðVcc  R  XÞ  1gÞ
dt CR ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
2

We can draw the graphs nn ðXÞ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . . and then use it to sketch the vector
fields on the real line. A fluid is flowing along the real line with a local velocities
nn ðXÞ. This imaginary fluid is called the phase fluid of our class AB push-pull
amplifier system, and the real line is the phase space. The flow is to the right where
nn ðXÞ [ 0 and to the left where nn ðXÞ\0. To find the solutions to dX dt ¼ nn ðXÞ; n ¼
1; 2; . . . starting from an arbitrary initial condition X0 As time goes, the phase point
moves along the X-axis according to some functions nn ðXÞ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . . This
function is called the trajectory based at X0 , and it represents the solutions of the
differential equation starting from the initial conditions X0 . A picture which shows
all the qualitatively different trajectories of our class AB push-pull amplifier system,
is called a phase portrait. The appearance of the phase portrait is controlled by the
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
fixed points Xgroup1 or Xgroup2 ; j ¼ 0; 1; . . ., defined by nn ðXgroup1 Þ ¼ 0;
ðjÞ
nn ðXgroup2 Þ ¼ 0; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; they correspond to stagnation points of the flow. Our
system fixed points represent equilibrium solutions (steady state, constant, rest
ðjÞ ðjÞ
solutions), since if X ¼ Xgroup1 or X ¼ Xgroup2 ; j ¼ 0; 1; . . . initially, then XðtÞ ¼
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Xgroup1 or XðtÞ ¼ Xgroup2 ; j ¼ 0; 1; . . . for all time. An class AB push-pull amplifier
system equilibrium is defined to be stable if all sufficiently small disturbances away
from it damp out in time. Stable system equilibria are represented geometrically by
528 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

stable fixed points. Conversely, unstable equilibria, in which disturbances grow in


time, are represented by unstable fixed points [2–4].

5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance


Circuit Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation

The Class C Amplifier design has the greatest efficiency but the poorest linearity of
the classes of amplifiers. The class C amplifier is heavily biased so that the output
current is zero for more than one half of an input sinusoidal signal cycle with the
transistor idling at its cut-off point. Due to its heavy audio distortion, class C
amplifiers are commonly used in high frequency sine wave oscillators and certain
types of radio frequency amplifiers. The class C amplifier conduction angle is
slightly less than 180°. The most common application of the Class C amplifier is the
RF (radio frequency) circuits like RF oscillator, RF amplifier etc. where there are
additional tuned circuits for retrieving the original input signal from the pulsed
output of the Class C amplifier and so the distortion caused by the amplifier has
little effect on the final output. Biasing resistor Rb pulls the base of Q1 further
downwards and the Q-point will be set some way below the cut-off point in the DC
load line. As a result the transistor will start conducting only after the input signal
amplitude has risen above the base emitter voltage (Vbe * 0.7 V) plus the
downward bias voltage caused by Rb. That is the reason why the major portion of
the input signal is absent in the output signal. Inductor L1 and capacitor C1 forms a
tank circuit which aids in the extraction of the required signal from the pulsed
output of the transistor. Class C operation means that the collector current flows for
less than 180° of the ac cycle. This implies that the collector current of a class C
amplifier is highly non-sinusoidal because current flows in pulses. To avoid dis-
tortion, class C amplifier makes use of a resonant tank circuit. This results in a
sinusoidal output voltage. Actual job of the active element (transistor Q1) here is to
produce a series of current pulses according to the input and make it flow through
the resonant circuit. Values of L1 and C1 are so selected that the resonant circuit
oscillates in the frequency of the input signal. Since the resonant circuit oscillates in
one frequency (generally the carrier frequency) all other frequencies are attenuated
and the required frequency can be squeezed out using a suitably tuned load.
Harmonics or noise present in the output signal can be eliminated using additional
filters. A coupling transformer can be used for transferring the power to the
load. The Class C amplifier has high efficiency and it is excellent in RF applications
[24–26] (Fig. 5.3).
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 529

Fig. 5.3 Class C power amplifier

Inductor L1 and capacitor C1 forms a tank circuit which aids in the extraction of
the required signal from the pulsed output of the transistor. Class C operation means
that the collector current flows for less than 180° of the ac cycle. This implies that
the collector current of a class C amplifier is highly non-sinusoidal because current
flows in pulses. To avoid distortion, class C amplifier makes use of a resonant tank
circuit. This results in a sinusoidal output voltage. Actual job of the active element
(transistor Q1) here is to produce a series of current pulses according to the input
and make it flow through the resonant circuit. Values of L1 and C1 are so selected
that the resonant circuit oscillates in the frequency of the input signal. Since the
resonant circuit oscillates in one frequency (generally the carrier frequency) all
other frequencies are attenuated and the required frequency can be squeezed out
using a suitably tuned load. Harmonics or noise present in the output signal can be
eliminated using additional filters. A coupling transformer can be used for trans-
ferring the power to the load. The Class C amplifier has high efficiency and it is
excellent in RF applications.
Since the input RF signal is a large signal we use in our analysis the Ebers-Moll
BJT model for Q1. The Ebers-Moll BJT model is a good large signal, steady state
model of the transistor and allows the state of conduction of the device to be easily
determined for different modes of operation of the device. The different modes of
operation are determined by the manner in which the junctions are biased [91–93]
(Fig. 5.4).
530 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

Fig. 5.4 Class C power amplifier equivalent circuit

Vs ðtÞ  VA1 d
ICQ1 þ IBQ1 ¼ IEQ1 ; IRs ¼ ; ICin ¼ Cin  ðVA1  VA2 Þ; IRs ¼ ICin ; ICin
Rs dt
¼ IBQ1 þ IRb

Collector emitter voltage expression for BJT NPN:

½ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


VCENPN  VT  lnf g;
½IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VCEQ1  VT  lnf g
½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
VA dIL
IRb ¼ 2 ; IL1 þ IC1 ¼ ICQ1 þ ICout ; ICout ¼ IRload ; Vcc  VA3 ¼ L1  1 ;
Rb dt
d
IC1 ¼ C1  ðVcc  VA3 Þ
dt
d VA4
VA2 ¼ VBEQ1 ; VCEQ1 ¼ VCout þ VRload ; ICout ¼ Cout  ðVA3  VA4 Þ; IRload ¼
dt Rload
Vs ðtÞ  VA1 d
IR s ¼ ) VA1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs ; ICin ¼ Cin  ðVA1  VA2 Þ
Rs dt
Z
1
) VA1  VA2 ¼  ICin  dt
Cin
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 531

Z Z
1 1
VA1 ¼ VA2 þ  ICin  dt; Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs ¼ VA2 þ  ICin  dt;
Cin Cin
Z
1
VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs   ICin  dt
Cin

VA2
IRb ¼ ) VA2 ¼ IRb  Rb ; IRb  Rb
Rb
Z
1
¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs   ICin  dt; VCEQ1 ¼ VA3
Cin
Z
d 1
fIRb  Rb ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs   ICin  dtg;
dt Cin
dIRb dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1
 Rb ¼   Rs   ICin
dt dt dt Cin
dIL d d 2 IL
Vcc  VA3 ¼ L1  1 ; IC1 ¼ C1  ðVcc  VA3 Þ; IC1 ¼ C1  L1  2 1
dt dt dt
Z
d 1
ICout ¼ Cout  ðVA3  VA4 Þ ) VA3  VA4 ¼  ICout  dt; VA3  IRload  Rload
dt
Z Cout
1
¼  ICout  dt
Cout

½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


VCEQ1 ¼ VA3 ; VT  lnf g
½ICQ1 Zaf  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
1
¼ IRload  Rload þ  ICout  dt
Cout

d ½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


ðlnf gÞ
dt ½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
dICQ1 dIEQ1
ðar   Þ  ½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
dt dt
dICQ1 dIEQ1
ð  af  Þ  ½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
¼ dt dt
½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
532 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

dICQ1 dIEQ1
ðar   Þ  ½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
dt dt
dICQ1 dIEQ1
ð  af  Þ  ½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VT  f dt dt g
½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
dIRload 1
¼  Rload þ  ICout
dt Cout

dICQ1 dIEQ1
ðar   Þ  ½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
dt dt
dICQ1 dIEQ1
ð  af  Þ  ½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
ICout ¼ IRload ; VT  f dt dt g
½ICQ1  af  IEQ1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
½ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
dICout 1
¼  Rload þ  ICout
dt Cout

d 2 IL1
We can summary our equations: IRs ¼ ICin ; IC1 ¼ C1  L1  dt2

dIRb dVs ðtÞ dICin 1


 Rb ¼   Rs   ICin ;
dt dt dt Cin
dICin dIRb 1 dVs ðtÞ Rs 1
Y1 ¼ ; ¼   Y1    ICin
dt dt Rb dt Rb Cin  Rb
d 2 IL
ICQ1 ¼ IL1 þ IC1  ICout ¼ IL1 þ C1  L1  2 1  ICout ; IBQ1 ¼ ICin  IRb
dt
d 2 IL
IEQ1 ¼ IBQ1 þ ICQ1 ¼ ICin  IRb þ IL1 þ C1  L1  2 1  ICout
dt

dICQ1 dIL1 d 3 IL dICout


¼ þ C1  L1  3 1  ;
dt dt dt dt
dIEQ1 dICin dIRb dIL1 d 3 IL dICout
¼  þ þ C1  L1  3 1 
dt dt dt dt dt dt

d 2 I L1
ICQ1  af  IEQ1 ¼ ð1  af Þ  IL1 þ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  þ ðaf  1Þ  ICout  af
dt2
 ICin þ af  IRb

d 2 I L1
ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 ¼ ðar  1Þ  IL1 þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  þ ð1  ar Þ  ICout
dt2
 ICin þ IRb
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 533

dICQ1 dtIEQ1 dIL d 3 IL dICout


ar   ¼ ðar  1Þ  1 þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  3 1 þ ð1  ar Þ 
dt dt dt dt dt
dICin dIRb
 þ
dt dt

dICQ1 dIEQ1 dIL d 3 IL dICout


 af  ¼ ð1  af Þ  1 þ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  3 1 þ ðaf  1Þ 
dt dt dt dt dt
dICin dIR
 af  þ af  b
dt dt

We define new variables in our system:

dICin dICout dIL dY3 d 2 IL1


Y1 ¼ ; Y2 ¼ ; Y3 ¼ 1 ; Y4 ¼ ¼ 2
dt dt dt dt dt
ICQ1  af  IEQ1 ¼ ð1  af Þ  IL1 þ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  Y4 þ ðaf  1Þ  ICout  af  ICin þ af  IRb
ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 ¼ ðar  1Þ  IL1 þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  Y4 þ ð1  ar Þ  ICout  ICin þ IRb

dICQ1 dtIEQ1 dY4


ar   ¼ ðar  1Þ  Y3 þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  þ ð1  ar Þ  Y2  Y1
dt dt dt
1 dVs ðtÞ Rs 1
þ   Y1    ICin
Rb dt Rb Cin  Rb

dICQ1 dIEQ1 dY4


 af  ¼ ð1  af Þ  Y3 þ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  þ ðaf  1Þ  Y2
dt dt dt
1 dVs ðtÞ Rs 1
 af  Y1 þ af  ð   Y1    ICin Þ
Rb dt Rb Cin  Rb

We define for simplicity of our analysis four functions:

ICQ1  af  IEQ1 ¼ ð1  af Þ  IL1 þ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  Y4


þ ðaf  1Þ  ICout  af  ICin þ af  IRb
g1 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; ICout ; ICin ; IRb Þ ¼ ð1  af Þ  IL1 þ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  Y4
þ ðaf  1Þ  ICout  af  ICin þ af  IRb
ICQ1  af  IEQ1 ¼ g1 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; ICout ; ICin ; IRb Þ; g1 ¼ g1 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; ICout ; ICin ; IRb Þ

ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 ¼ ðar  1Þ  IL1 þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  Y4


þ ð1  ar Þ  ICout  ICin þ IRb
g2 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; ICout ; ICin ; IRb Þ ¼ ðar  1Þ  IL1 þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  Y4
þ ð1  ar Þ  ICout  ICin þ IRb
ar  ICQ1  IEQ1 ¼ g2 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; ICout ; ICin ; IRb Þ; g2 ¼ g2 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; ICout ; ICin ; IRb Þ
534 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

dICQ1 dtIEQ1 dY4 dVs ðtÞ


ar   ¼ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  þ g3 ðY3 ; Y2 ; Y1 ; ICin ; Þ;
dt dt dt dt
dVs ðtÞ
g3 ¼ g3 ðY3 ; Y2 ; Y1 ; ICin ; Þ
dt
dVs ðtÞ Rs
g3 ðY3 ; Y2 ; Y1 ; ICin ; Þ ¼ ðar  1Þ  Y3 þ ð1  ar Þ  Y2  Y1  ð1 þ Þ
dt Rb
1 dVs ðtÞ 1
þ    ICin
Rb dt Cin  Rb

dICQ1 dIEQ1 dY4 dVs ðtÞ


 af  ¼ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  þ g4 ðY3 ; Y2 ; Y1 ; ICin ; Þ;
dt dt dt dt
dVs ðtÞ
g4 ¼ g4 ðY3 ; Y2 ; Y1 ; ICin ; Þ
dt
dVs ðtÞ Rs
g4 ðY3 ; Y2 ; Y1 ; ICin ; Þ ¼ ð1  af Þ  Y3 þ ðaf  1Þ  Y2  Y1  af  ð1 þ Þ
dt Rb
af dVs ðtÞ af
þ    ICin
Rb dt Cin  Rb

The main system differential equation can be present as follow:

dY4
½ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  þ g3   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
dt
dY4
½ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  þ g4   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VT  f dt g
½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
1
¼ Y2  Rload þ  ICout
Cout

dY4
½ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  þ g3   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
dt
dY4
 ½ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  þ g4   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
dt
1 1
¼  ½Y2  Rload þ  ICout   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VT Cout

dY4
fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1 
dt
1 1
¼  ½Y2  Rload þ  ICout   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VT Cout
 g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 535

1 1
 ½Y2  Rload þ  ICout   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VT Cout
dY4 g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
¼
dt fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1

We can summary our system differential equations:

dICin dICout dIL1 dY3


¼ Y1 ; ¼ Y2 ; ¼ Y3 ; ¼ Y4
dt dt dt dt
1 1
 ½Y2  Rload þ  ICout   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VT Cout
dY4 g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
¼
dt fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1

The first stage is to find our system fixed points: It is done by letting

dICin dICout dIL1 dY3


¼ 0 ) Y1 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) Y3 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) Y4
dt dt dt dt
dY4
¼ 0; ¼0
dt

g1 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; IC out ; IC in ; IRb Þ ¼ ð1  af Þ  IL1 þ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  Y4


þ ðaf  1Þ  IC out  af  IC in þ af  IRb
g2 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; IC out ; IC in ; IRb Þ ¼ ðar  1Þ  IL1 þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  Y4
þ ð1  ar Þ  IC out  IC in þ IRb

dVs ðtÞ 1 dVs ðtÞ 1


g3 ¼ g3 ðY3 ; Y2 ; Y1 ; IC in ; Þ¼    I
dt Rb dt Cin  Rb Cin
dVs ðtÞ af dVs ðtÞ af
g4 ¼ g4 ðY3 ; Y2 ; Y1 ; IC in ; Þ¼    ICin
dt Rb dt Cin  Rb

dY4
¼ 0 ) fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ
dt
 ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1 6¼ 0
C1  L1 6¼ 0 ) ðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ
 ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  6¼ 0
1 1
  I   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VT Cout Cout
 g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  ¼ 0
536 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

a
Assumption dVdts ðtÞ ! e; g3 ¼  Cin1Rb  IC in ; g4 ¼  Cin R f
b
 ICin
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the class C power amplifier equivalent circuit consists in
adding to coordinate ½IL1 ; IRb ; IRload ; ICout ; ICin ; Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4  arbitrarily small incre-
ments of exponentially form ½iL1 ; iRb ; iRload ; iCout ; iCin ; y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4   ekt and retaining
the first order terms in IL1 ; IRb ; IRload ; ICout ; ICin ; Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 . The system of
homogenous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigen-
values [4]. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set of the below
circuit variables, circuit variables derivative and circuit variables second order
derivative with respect to time into class C power amplifier [2–4]. Our class C
power amplifier equivalent circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of
exponential form ½iL1 ; iRb ; iRload ; iCout ; iCin ; y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4   ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed
point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ;
ðjÞ
IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt ; ICin ðtÞ ¼ ICin þ iCin  ekt ; ICout ðtÞ ¼ ICout þ iCout  ekt ;
ðjÞ
IRb ðtÞ ¼ IRb þ iRb  ekt

dICin dIC dIL dY3


¼ iCin  k  ekt ; out ¼ iCout  k  ekt ; 1 ¼ iL1  k  ekt ; ¼ y3  k  ekt ;
dt dt dt dt
dY4
¼ y4  k  ekt
dt

ðjÞ dIRload ðtÞ dIR ðtÞ


IRload ðtÞ ¼ IRload þ iRload  ekt ; ¼ iRload  k  ekt ; b ¼ iRb  k  ekt ;
dt dt
dVs ðtÞ
!e
dt

ðjÞ Rs 1 ðjÞ
iRb  k  ekt ¼ ½Y1 þ y1  ekt     ½I þ iCin  ekt 
Rb Cin  Rb Cin

ðjÞ Rs 1 ðjÞ Rs 1
iRb  k  ekt ¼ Y1    ICin  y1   ekt  iCin   ekt
Rb Cin  Rb Rb Cin  Rb
ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point Y1  RRbs  C1in  Rb  ICin ¼ 0: iRb  k  y1  RRbs  iCin  C1in  Rb ¼ 0

dICin ðjÞ ðjÞ


¼ Y1 ; iCin  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y1 ¼ 0; iCin  k þ y1 ¼ 0
dt
dICout ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ Y2 ; iCout  k  ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y2 ¼ 0; iCout  k þ y2 ¼ 0
dt
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 537

dIL1 ðjÞ ðjÞ


¼ Y3 ; iL1  k  ekt ¼ Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ; Y3 ¼ 0; iL1  k þ y3 ¼ 0
dt
dY3 ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ Y4 ; y3  k  ekt ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt ; Y4 ¼ 0; y3  k þ y4 ¼ 0
dt
ðjÞ
g1 ðIL1 ðtÞ; Y4 ðtÞ; ICout ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; IRb ðtÞÞ ¼ ð1  af Þ  ðIL1 þ iL1  ekt Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  ðY4 þ y4  ekt Þ þ ðaf  1Þ  ðICout þ iCout  ekt Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
 af  ðICin þ iCin  ekt Þ þ af  ðIRb þ iRb  ekt Þ

ðjÞ ðjÞ
g1 ðIL1 ðtÞ; Y4 ðtÞ; ICout ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; IRb ðtÞÞ ¼ ð1  af Þ  IL1 þ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  Y4
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ðaf  1Þ  ICout  af  ICin þ af  IRb þ iL1  ð1  af Þ  ekt þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  ekt
þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  ekt  iCin  af  ekt þ iRb  af  ekt

At fixed point:

ðjÞ ðjÞ
g1 ¼ g1 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; IC out ; IC in ; IRb Þ ¼ ð1  af Þ  IL1 þ ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  Y4
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ðaf  1Þ  ICout  af  ICin þ af  IRb

g1 ðtÞ ¼ g1 ðIL1 ðtÞ; Y4 ðtÞ; ICout ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; IRb ðtÞÞ ¼ g1 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; IC out ; IC in ; IRb Þ þ iL1  ð1  af Þ  ekt
þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  ekt þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  ekt  iCin  af  ekt þ iRb  af  ekt

g1 ðtÞ ¼ g1 þ ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af


þ iRb  af   ekt

ðjÞ
g2 ðIL1 ðtÞ; Y4 ðtÞ; ICout ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; IRb ðtÞÞ ¼ ðar  1Þ  IL1 þ iL1  ðar  1Þ  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  Y4 þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  ekt þ ð1  ar Þ  ICout
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  ekt  ICin  iCin  ekt þ IRb þ iRb  ekt

ðjÞ ðjÞ
g2 ðIL1 ðtÞ; Y4 ðtÞ; ICout ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; IRb ðtÞÞ ¼ ðar  1Þ  IL1 þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  Y4
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ð1  ar Þ  ICout  ICin þ IRb þ iL1  ðar  1Þ  ekt þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  ekt
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  ekt  iCin  ekt þ iRb  ekt

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


At fixed point: ðar  1Þ  IL1 þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  Y4 þ ð1  ar Þ  ICout  ICin þ
ðjÞ
IRb ¼ 0
538 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

ðjÞ ðjÞ
g2 ¼ g2 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; IC out ; IC in ; IRb Þ ¼ ðar  1Þ  IL1 þ ðar  1Þ  C1  L1  Y4
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ð1  ar Þ  ICout  ICin þ IRb ¼ 0

g2 ðtÞ ¼ g2 þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt

dVs ðtÞ ðjÞ


g3 ðY3 ðtÞ; Y2 ðtÞ; Y1 ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; Þ ¼ ðar  1Þ  ½Y3 þ y3  ekt 
dt
ðjÞ
þ ð1  ar Þ  ½Y2 þ y2  ekt 
ðjÞ Rs 1 dVs ðtÞ
 ½Y1 þ y1  ekt   ð1 þ Þþ 
Rb Rb dt
1 ðjÞ
  ½I þ iCin  ekt 
Cin  Rb Cin

dVs ðtÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ Rs


g3 ðY3 ðtÞ; Y2 ðtÞ; Y1 ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; Þ ¼ ðar  1Þ  Y3 þ ð1  ar Þ  Y2  Y1  ð1 þ Þ
dt Rb
1 ðjÞ
  I þ y3  ðar  1Þ  ekt þ y2  ð1  ar Þ  ekt
Cin  Rb Cin
Rs 1 1 dVs ðtÞ
 y1  ð1 þ Þ  ekt  iCin   ekt þ 
Rb Cin  Rb Rb dt
dV ðtÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
g3 ¼ g3 ðY3 ; Y2 ; Y1 ; IC in ;
s
Þ ¼ ðar  1Þ  Y3 þ ð1  ar Þ  Y2
dt
ðjÞ Rs 1 ðjÞ
 Y1  ð1 þ Þ  I
Rb Cin  Rb Cin

dVs ðtÞ
g3 ðY3 ðtÞ; Y2 ðtÞ; Y1 ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; Þ ¼ g3 þ y3  ðar  1Þ  ekt þ y2  ð1  ar Þ  ekt
dt
Rs 1 1 dVs ðtÞ dVs ðtÞ
 y1  ð1 þ Þ  ekt  iCin   ekt þ  ; !e
Rb Cin  Rb Rb dt dt

dVs ðtÞ Rs 1
g3 ð ! eÞ ¼ g3 þ ½y3  ðar  1Þ þ y2  ð1  ar Þ  y1  ð1 þ Þ  iCin    ekt
dt Rb Cin  Rb
dVs ðtÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
g4 ðY3 ðtÞ; Y2 ðtÞ; Y1 ðtÞ; ICin ; Þ ¼ ð1  af Þ  ½Y3 þ y3  ekt  þ ðaf  1Þ  ½Y2 þ y2  ekt 
dt
ðjÞ Rs af dVs ðtÞ af ðjÞ
 ½Y1 þ y1  ekt   af  ð1 þ Þ þ    ½I þ iCin  ekt 
Rb Rb dt Cin  Rb Cin
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 539

dVs ðtÞ ðjÞ


g4 ðY3 ðtÞ; Y2 ðtÞ; Y1 ðtÞ; ICin ; Þ ¼ ð1  af Þ  Y3 þ y3  ð1  af Þ  ekt
dt
ðjÞ
þ ðaf  1Þ  Y2 þ y2  ðaf  1Þ  ekt
ðjÞ Rs Rs
 Y1  af  ð1 þ Þ  y1  af  ð1 þ Þ  ekt
Rb Rb
af dVs ðtÞ af ðjÞ af
þ    ICin  iCin   ekt
Rb dt Cin  Rb Cin  Rb

dVs ðtÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


g4 ðY3 ðtÞ; Y2 ðtÞ; Y1 ðtÞ; ICin ; Þ ¼ ð1  af Þ  Y3 þ ðaf  1Þ  Y2
dt
ðjÞ Rs af ðjÞ
 Y1  af  ð1 þ Þ   ICin þ y3  ð1  af Þ  ekt þ y2  ðaf  1Þ  ekt
Rb Cin  Rb
Rs kt af af dVs ðtÞ
 y1  af  ð1 þ Þ  e  iCin   ekt þ 
Rb Cin  Rb Rb dt
dV ðtÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
g4 ¼ g4 ðY3 ; Y2 ; Y1 ; IC in ;
s
Þ ¼ ð1  af Þ  Y3 þ ðaf  1Þ  Y2
dt
ðjÞ Rs af ðjÞ
 Y1  af  ð1 þ Þ  I
Rb Cin  Rb Cin

dVs ðtÞ
g4 ðY3 ðtÞ; Y2 ðtÞ; Y1 ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; Þ ¼ g4 þ y3  ð1  af Þ  ekt þ y2  ðaf  1Þ  ekt
dt
Rs af af dVs ðtÞ dVs ðtÞ
 y1  af  ð1 þ Þ  ekt  iCin   ekt þ  ; !e
Rb Cin  Rb Rb dt dt

dVs ðtÞ
g4 ð ! eÞ
dt
Rs af
¼ g4 þ ½y3  ð1  af Þ þ y2  ðaf  1Þ  y1  af  ð1 þ Þ  iCin  
Rb Cin  Rb
 ekt

Back to our last differential equation:

1 1
 ½Y2  Rload þ  ICout   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VT Cout
dY4 g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
¼
dt fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1

At fixed point: dY4


dt ¼0
540 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
 ½Y2  Rload þ  I   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VT Cout Cout
g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1


¼0

We define function: dY4


dt ¼ tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ

1 1
 ½Y2  Rload þ  ICout   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
VT Cout
g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1

First we extract the above function tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ denominator.

fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1


¼ fðar  1Þ  g1  ð1  af Þ  g2 þ ðar  1Þ  ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
 ð1  af Þ  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1

We define global parameter:

C1 ¼ C1 ðar ; af ; Isc ; Ise Þ ¼ ðar  1Þ  ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc  ð1  af Þ  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise

fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1


¼ fðar  1Þ  g1  ð1  af Þ  g2 þ C1 ðar ; af ; Isc ; Ise Þg  C1  L1

fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1


¼ fðar  1Þ  ðg1 þ ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ
 iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt Þ  ð1  af Þ  ðg2 þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ
þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt Þ
þ C1 ðar ; af ; Isc ; Ise Þg  C1  L1

fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1


¼ fðar  1Þ  g1 þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1
þ iCout  ðar  1Þ  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  ðar  1Þ  af þ iRb  ðar  1Þ  af   ekt
 ð1  af Þ  g2  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  ðar  1Þ
 C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  af Þ  ð1  ar Þ  ð1  af Þ  iCin þ ð1  af Þ  iRb   ekt
þ C1 ðar ; af ; Isc ; Ise Þg  C1  L1
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 541

fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1


¼ fðar  1Þ  g1  ð1  af Þ  g2 þ C1 ðar ; af ; Isc ; Ise Þ þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ  ð1  af Þ
þ y4  ðar  1Þ  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðar  1Þ  ðaf  1Þ
 iCin  ðar  1Þ  af þ iRb  ðar  1Þ  af   ekt
 ½iL1  ð1  af Þ  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1
þ iCout  ð1  af Þ  ð1  ar Þ
 ð1  af Þ  iCin þ ð1  af Þ  iRb   ekt g  C1  L1

fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1


¼ fðar  1Þ  g1  ð1  af Þ  g2 þ C1 ðar ; af ; Isc ; Ise Þ
þ ½ð1  af Þ  ðar  1Þ  af   iCin  ekt þ ½ðar  1Þ  af  ð1  af Þ  iRb  ekt g  C1  L1

We define the following new system parameters for simplicity.

C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ ¼ ðar  1Þ  g1  ð1  af Þ  g2 þ C1 ðar ; af ; Isc ; Ise Þ


C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ¼ ð1  af Þ  ðar  1Þ  af ; C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ¼ ðar  1Þ  af  ð1  af Þ

fðar  1Þ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ð1  af Þ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g  C1  L1


¼ fC2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt g  C1  L1

Second we extract the above function tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ numerator.


We define for simplicity three functions which there summation gives the
function tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ numerator.

1 1
U1 ðY2 ; g1 ; g2 ; af ; ar ; . . .Þ ¼  ½Y2  Rload þ  ICout   ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
VT Cout
 ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc ; U3 ðg2 ; g4 ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ
¼ g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
P3
Function tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ numerator is define as Uk .U1 ðY2 ; g1 ; g2 ;
P k¼1
af ; ar ; . . .Þ ¼ V1T  8j¼1 U1j .

U1j¼1 ¼ g1  g2  Y2  Rload ¼ fg1 þ ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1


þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt g
 fg2 þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1
ðjÞ
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt g  fY2 þ y2  ekt g  Rload
542 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

U1j¼1 ¼ fg1  g2 þ g1  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt
þ g2  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt
þ ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt
ðjÞ
 ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt g  fY2 þ y2  ekt g  Rload

dICout ðjÞ
Since iL1  iL1 ! e; y4  iL1 ! e; iCout  iL1 ! e. . .; dt ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0 then

U1j¼1 ¼ fg1  g2 þ g1  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1


þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt þ g2  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ
þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt g  y2  ekt  Rload

U1j¼1 ¼ fg1  g2  y2  ekt þ g1  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1


þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   y2  ekt  ekt þ g2  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ
þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   y2  ekt  ekt g  Rload

Since iL1  y2 ! e; y4  y2 ! e; . . .; iL1  y2 ! e; y4  y2 ! e. . .; U1j¼1 ¼ g1  g2 


Rload  y2  ekt

U1j¼2 ¼ Y2  g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload


ðjÞ
¼ ðY2 þ y2  ekt Þ  fg1 þ ½iL1  ð1  af Þ
þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ
 iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload

dICout ðjÞ
Since dt ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0; y2  iL1 ! e; y2  y4 ! e. . . then

U1j¼2 ¼ y2  ekt  g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload


¼ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload  y2  ekt

U1j¼3 ¼ Y2  g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload


ðjÞ
¼ ðY2 þ y2  ekt Þ  fg2 þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ
 C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt g
 ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 543

dICout ðjÞ
Since dt ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0; y2  iL1 ! e; y2  y4 ! e. . . then

U1j¼3 ¼ Y2  g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload ¼ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload  y2  ekt

dICout ðjÞ
U1j¼4 ¼ Y2  Rload  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise ; ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0;
dt
U1j¼4 ¼ Rload  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  y2  ekt

1 ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ICout  g1  g2  ¼ ðICout þ iCout  ekt Þ  fg1 þ ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1
Cout
þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt g  fg2 þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1
1
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt g 
Cout

ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout þ iCout  ekt Þ  fg1  g2 þ g1  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt þ g2  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1
þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt þ ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1
þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1
1
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt g 
Cout

dICout ðjÞ
Since iL1  iL1 ! e; y4  iL1 ! e; iCout  iL1 ! e. . .; dt ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0 then

ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout þ iCout  ekt Þ  fg1  g2 þ g1  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt þ g2  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1
1
þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt g 
Cout

ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout þ iCout  ekt Þ  ðg1  g2 þ fiL1  ½g1  ðar  1Þ þ g2  ð1  af Þ
þ ½g1  ðar  1Þ þ g2  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  y4 þ iCout  ½g1  ð1  ar Þ þ g2  ðaf  1Þ
1
 iCin  ½g1 þ g2  af  þ iRb  ½g1 þ g2  af g  ekt Þ 
Cout
544 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout  g1  g2 þ ICout  fiL1  ½g1  ðar  1Þ þ g2  ð1  af Þ
þ ½g1  ðar  1Þ þ g2  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  y4
þ iCout  ½g1  ð1  ar Þ þ g2  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  ½g1 þ g2  af 
þ iRb  ½g1 þ g2  af g  ekt þ g1  g2  iCout  ekt
þ fiL1  ½g1  ðar  1Þ þ g2  ð1  af Þ
þ ½g1  ðar  1Þ þ g2  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  y4
þ iCout  ½g1  ð1  ar Þ þ g2  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  ½g1 þ g2  af 
1
þ iRb  ½g1 þ g2  af g  iCout  ekt  ekt Þ 
Cout
Since iL1  iCout ! e; y4  iCout ! e. . .
ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout  g1  g2 þ ICout  fiL1  ½g1  ðar  1Þ þ g2  ð1  af Þ
þ ½g1  ðar  1Þ þ g2  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  y4 þ iCout  ½g1  ð1  ar Þ þ g2  ðaf  1Þ
1
 iCin  ½g1 þ g2  af  þ iRb  ½g1 þ g2  af g  ekt þ g1  g2  iCout  ekt Þ 
Cout

f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ¼ iL1  ½g1  ðar  1Þ þ g2  ð1  af Þ


þ ½g1  ðar  1Þ þ g2  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1  y4
þ iCout  ½g1  ð1  ar Þ þ g2  ðaf  1Þ
 iCin  ½g1 þ g2  af  þ iRb  ½g1 þ g2  af 

ðjÞ ðjÞ 1
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout  g1  g2 þ ICout  f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt þ g1  g2  iCout  ekt Þ 
Cout

1
U1j¼6 ¼ ICout  g1  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise
Cout
ðjÞ
¼ ðICout þ iCout  ekt Þ  fg1 þ ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1
1
þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise
Cout

1
U1j¼6 ¼ ICout  g1  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise
Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ fICout  g1 þ ICout  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1
þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt þ iCout  ekt  g1
þ iCout  ekt  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ
þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ
1
 iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise
Cout
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 545

Since iL1  iCout ! e; y4  iCout ! e . . .

1
U1j¼6 ¼ ICout  g1  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise
Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ fICout  g1 þ ICout  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1
1
þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt þ iCout  ekt  g1 g  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise
Cout

f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ¼ iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin


 af þ iRb  af

1 ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼6 ¼ ICout  g1  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise ¼ fICout  g1 þ ICout  f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt
Cout
1
þ g1  iCout  ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise
Cout

1
U1j¼7 ¼ ICout  g2  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc
Cout
ðjÞ
¼ ðICout þ iCout  ekt Þ  fg2 þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1
1
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc
Cout

1 ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼7 ¼ ICout  g2  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc ¼ fICout  g2 þ ICout  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ
Cout
þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt
þ g2  iCout  ekt þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ
þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb 
1
 iCout  ekt  ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc
Cout

Since iL1  iCout ! e; y4  iCout ! e . . .

1
U1j¼7 ¼ ICout  g2  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc
Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ fICout  g2 þ ICout  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ
þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt
1
þ g2  iCout  ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc
Cout

f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ¼ iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb


546 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

1 ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼7 ¼ ICout  g2  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc ¼ fICout  g2 þ ICout  f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt
Cout
1
þ g2  iCout  ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc
Cout

1 ðjÞ 1
U1j¼8 ¼ ICout   ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise ¼ ðICout þ iCout  ekt Þ   ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise
Cout Cout

1 ðjÞ 1
U1j¼8 ¼ ICout   ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise ¼ ICout   ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise
Cout Cout
1
þ  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  iCout  ekt
Cout
We can summary our last results in the following Table 5.1.
Table 5.1 Class C power amplifier (PA) with parallel resonance, U1j expressions
U1j Expression
j ¼ 1 ðU1j¼1 Þ U1j¼1 ¼ g1  g2  Rload  y2  ekt
j ¼ 2 ðU1j¼2 Þ U1j¼2 ¼ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload  y2  ekt
j ¼ 3 ðU1j¼3 Þ U1j¼3 ¼ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload  y2  ekt
j ¼ 4 ðU1j¼4 Þ U1j¼4 ¼ Rload  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  y2  ekt
j ¼ 5 ðU1j¼5 Þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout  g1  g2 þ ICout  f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt þ g1  g2  iCout  ekt Þ  C1out
j ¼ 6 ðU1j¼6 Þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼6 ¼ fICout  g1 þ ICout  f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt
1
þ g1  iCout  ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise
Cout
j ¼ 7 ðU1j¼7 Þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼7 ¼ fICout  g2 þ ICout  f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt
1
þ g2  iCout  ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc
Cout
j ¼ 8 ðU1j¼8 Þ ðjÞ 1
U1j¼8 ¼ ICout   ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise
Cout
1
þ  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  iCout  ekt
Cout

U2 ðg1 ; g3 ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 


dVs ðtÞ
¼ g3 ð ! eÞ  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
dt
g1 ðtÞ ¼ g1 þ ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt
g2 ðtÞ ¼ g2 þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt
dVs ðtÞ Rs 1
g3 ð ! eÞ ¼ g3 þ ½y3  ðar  1Þ þ y 2  ð1  ar Þ  y1  ð1 þ Þ  iCin    ekt
dt Rb Cin  Rb
a
g4 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ ¼ g4 þ ½y3  ð1  af Þ þ y2  ðaf  1Þ  y1  af  ð1 þ Rb Þ
Rs
 iCin  Cin R
f
b
  ekt
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 547

dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ fg3 þ ½y3  ðar  1Þ þ y2  ð1  ar Þ
dt
Rs 1
 y1  ð1 þ Þ  iCin    ekt g  f½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc  þ ½iL1  ð1  af Þ
Rb C in  Rb
þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt g

dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ fg3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
dt
þ g3  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt
Rs 1
þ ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½y3  ðar  1Þ þ y2  ð1  ar Þ  y1  ð1 þ Þ  iCin    ekt
Rb Cin  Rb
Rs 1
þ ½y3  ðar  1Þ þ y2  ð1  ar Þ  y1  ð1 þ Þ  iCin    ekt  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ
Rb Cin  Rb
þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt g

Since y3  iL1 ! e; y3  y4 ! e . . .

dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ fg3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
dt
þ g3  ½iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af   ekt
Rs 1
þ ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   ½y3  ðar  1Þ þ y2  ð1  ar Þ  y1  ð1 þ Þ  iCin    ekt g
Rb Cin  Rb

We define two functions:

f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ¼ iL1  ð1  af Þ þ y4  ð1  af Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ðaf  1Þ  iCin  af þ iRb  af


Rs 1
f5 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ ¼ y3  ðar  1Þ þ y2  ð1  ar Þ  y1  ð1 þ Þ  iCin 
Rb Cin  Rb

dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ fg3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
dt
þ g3  f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt þ ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   f5 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ  ekt g

dVs ðtÞ dVs ðtÞ


U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ¼ g4 ð ! eÞ  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
dt dt
dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ¼ fg4 þ ½y3  ð1  af Þ þ y2  ðaf  1Þ
dt
Rs af
 y1  af  ð1 þ Þ  iCin    ekt g  fg2 þ ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1
Rb Cin  Rb
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g
548 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ¼ fg4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
dt
þ g4  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt
Rs
þ ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise   ½y3  ð1  af Þ þ y2  ðaf  1Þ  y1  af  ð1 þ Þ
Rb
af kt
 iCin    e þ ½y3  ð1  af Þ þ y2  ðaf  1Þ
Cin  Rb
Rs af
 y1  af  ð1 þ Þ  iCin    ekt  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1
Rb Cin  Rb
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt g

Since y3  iL1 ! e; y3  y4 ! e . . .

dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ¼ fg4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
dt
þ g4  ½iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1
þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb   ekt þ ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
Rs
 ½y3  ð1  af Þ þ y2  ðaf  1Þ  y1  af  ð1 þ Þ
Rb
af
 iCin    ekt g
Cin  Rb

We define two functions:

f6 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ¼ iL1  ðar  1Þ þ y4  ðar  1Þ  C1  L1 þ iCout  ð1  ar Þ  iCin þ iRb


Rs af
f7 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ ¼ y3  ð1  af Þ þ y2  ðaf  1Þ  y1  af  ð1 þ Þ  iCin 
Rb Cin  Rb

dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ¼ fg4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
dt
þ g4  f6 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt þ ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise   f7 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ  ekt g

Finally we get the enhance expression for tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ


P3
k¼1 Uk
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼  
fC2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt g  C1  L1
P8 P3
1
VT  j¼1 U1j þ k¼2 Uk
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
fC2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt g  C1  L1
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 549
P8
1 1 j¼1 U1j
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . . ¼ f 
C1  L1 VT ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
P3
k¼2 Uk
þ   g
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 

1 1
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼  f  t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þg
C1  L1 VT

1 1 X2 X2
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ f  t1k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t2k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þg
C1  L1 VT k¼1 k¼1

P
8
U1j
j¼1
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
P3
k¼2 Uk
t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 

1 1
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼  f  t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þg
C1  L1 VT

Stage 1:

P8 ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ


j¼1 U1j C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼   
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  e  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
kt

P8
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt   j¼1 U1j
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ  C23 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  e2kt 
2

ðiCin  iRb Þ2 ¼ i2Cin  2  iCin  iRb þ i2Rb ; i2Cin ! e; iCin  iRb ! e; i2Rb ! e; ðiCin  iRb Þ2
!e
P8
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt   j¼1 U1j
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

P8 P8
j¼1 U1j C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt  j¼1 U1j
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ 
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
550 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

P8
j¼1 U1j
t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ ; t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
P
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt  8j¼1 U1j
¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

X
2
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ t1k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ
k¼1

½g1  g2  Rload  y2  ekt þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload  y2  ekt


þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload  y2  ekt þ Rload  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  y2  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ICout  g1  g2  C1out þ ICout  C1out  f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt þ g1  g2  C1out  iCout  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ fICout  g1 þ ICout  f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt þ g1  iCout  ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ  C1out  Ise
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ fICout  g2 þ ICout  f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt þ g2  iCout  ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ  C1out  Isc
ðjÞ
þ ICout  1
Cout  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise þ Cout  ðar  af
1
 1Þ2  Isc  Ise  iCout  ekt 
t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

ðjÞ
½ICout  C1out  ½ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise þ g1  g2 þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc 
þ ½g1  g2  Rload  y2 þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload  y2
þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload  y2 þ Rload  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  y2
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ICout  C1out  f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ þ g1  g2  C1out  iCout þ ICout  ðar  af  1Þ  C1out  Ise  f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
ðjÞ
þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  C1out  Ise  iCout þ ICout  ðar  af  1Þ  C1out  Isc  f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  C1out  Isc  iCout þ C1out  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  iCout   ekt
t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

ðjÞ ðjÞ 1
X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ ¼ ICout   ½ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise þ g1  g2
Cout
þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc 
ðjÞ
X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ
t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
½g1  g2  Rload  y2 þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload  y2
þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload  y2 þ Rload  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  y2
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ICout  C1out  f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ þ g1  g2  C1out  iCout þ ICout  ðar  af  1Þ  C1out  Ise  f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
ðjÞ
þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  C1out  Ise  iCout þ ICout  ðar  af  1Þ  C1out  Isc  f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
þ g2 ðar af 1ÞCout
1
Isc iCout þ Cout1
ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise iCout ekt
þ C2 ðg1 ;g2 ;C1 ;ar ;af Þ

ðjÞ
X1 ðI ;g ;g ;...Þ !1 ðy2 ;f1 ðiL1 ;y4 ;...Þ;iCout ;...Þekt
We define t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ C2 ðgC;gout ;C11 ;a2r ;af Þ þ C2 ðg1 ;g2 ;C1 ;ar ;af Þ
1 2
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 551

!1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ ¼ ½g1  g2  Rload  y2 þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload  y2
þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload  y2 þ Rload  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  y2
ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ 1
þ ICout   f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ þ g1  g2   iCout þ ICout  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise  f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
Cout Cout Cout
1 ðjÞ 1
þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise  iCout þ ICout  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc  f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
Cout Cout
1 1
þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc  iCout þ  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  iCout 
Cout Cout

P
8
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt  U1j
j¼1
t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt  ½g1  g2  Rload  y2  ekt þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload  y2  ekt
þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload  y2  ekt þ Rload  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  y2  ekt
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 1
þ ICout  g1  g2  þ ICout   f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt þ g1  g2   iCout  ekt
Cout Cout Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ 1
þ fICout  g1 þ ICout  f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt þ g1  iCout  ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise
Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ 1
þ fICout  g2 þ ICout  f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt þ g2  iCout  ekt g  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc
Cout
ðjÞ 1 1
þ ICout  2
 ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Ise þ  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Ise  iCout  ekt 
2
Cout Cout
t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ 2  
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

ðjÞ 1
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt  ½ICout   ½ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise þ g1  g2
Cout
þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc 
þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt  ½g1  g2  Rload  y2 þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Rload  y2
þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc  Rload  y2 þ Rload  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  y2
ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ 1
þ ICout   f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; :::Þ þ g1  g2   iCout þ ICout  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise  f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; :::Þ
Cout Cout Cout
1 ðjÞ 1
þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ   Ise  iCout þ ICout  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc  f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; :::Þ
Cout Cout
1 1
þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ   Isc  iCout þ  ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise  iCout   ekt
Cout Cout
t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; :::Þ =
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

Since ðiCin  iRb Þ  y2 ! e; ðiCin  iRb Þ  f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ! e. . .

1 ðjÞ
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt  ½ICout   ½ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise þ g1  g2
Cout
þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc 
t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
552 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

!2 ðg1 ;g2 ;ar ;af ;...ÞC3 ðaf ;ar ÞðiCin iRb Þekt
We define t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ C22 ðg1 ;g2 ;C1 ;ar ;af Þ

ðjÞ 1
!2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ ¼ ½ICout   ½ðar  af  1Þ2  Isc  Ise þ g1  g2
Cout
þ g1  ðar  af  1Þ  Ise þ g2  ðar  af  1Þ  Isc 

Stage 2:
P3
k¼2 Uk
t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 

dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ fg3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc  þ g3  f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt
dt
þ ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   f5 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ  ekt g

dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ¼ fg4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  þ g4  f6 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt
dt
þ ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise   f7 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ  ekt g

U2 ðg1 ; g3 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ þ U3 ðg2 ; g4 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ
t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 

U2 ðg1 ; g3 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ


t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ
þ
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 

U2 ðg1 ; g3 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ


t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 

U3 ðg2 ; g4 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ


t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 

X
2
t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ t2k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ
k¼1
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 553

U2 ðg1 ; g3 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ


t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ f g
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
f g
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 

dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ  ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dt
 C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ  C23 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ2  e2kt

Assume ðiCin  iRb Þ2 ! e then

dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ  ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dt
 C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

U2 ðg1 ; g3 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ


t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt

C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

U2 ðg1 ; g3 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ


t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
fg3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc  þ g3  f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt
þ ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   f5 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ  ekt g  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt
þ
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

Since f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ ! e; f5 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ ! e

U2 ðg1 ; g3 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ


t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt
þ
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
554 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

fg3  f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ

g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc  þ ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   f5 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þg  ekt
t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼    
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt
þ
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1ÞIsc 


We define t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼  C2 ðg1 ;g2 ;C1 ;ar ;af Þ þ !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ;
kt
. . .Þ  e

g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ


!4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
fg  f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ þ ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   f5 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þg
 3
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

U3 ðg2 ; g4 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ


t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
f g
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 

dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ  ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dt
 C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ  C23 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ2  e2kt

Assume ðiCin  iRb Þ2 ! e then

dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ  ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dt
 C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt 
t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

U3 ðg2 ; g4 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ


t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt

C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 555

U3 ðg2 ; g4 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ


t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
fg4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  þ g4  f6 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ekt
þ ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise   f7 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ  ekt g  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt
þ
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

Since f6 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ ! e; f7 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ ! e

U3 ðg2 ; g4 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ


t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise   C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt
þ
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
fg4  f6 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
þ ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise   f7 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þg  ekt

C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise   C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt
þ
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1ÞIse 


We define t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ C2 ðg1 ;g2 ;C1 ;ar ;af Þ þ !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þ  ekt

!3 ðiCin ; iRb ; f6 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; f7 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .ÞÞ


g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise   C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ
¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
fg  f6 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ þ ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise   f7 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þg
 4
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

Summary: We define function: dY4


dt ¼ tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ

dY4 1 1 X2 X2
¼ f  t1k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t2k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þg
dt C1  L1 VT k¼1 k¼1

dY4 1 X
2
1 X
2
¼  t1k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ  t2k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ
dt C1  L1  VT k¼1 C1  L1 k¼1
556 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

ðjÞ
X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ  ekt
t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ þ
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

!2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt


t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 


t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼  þ !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
 ekt

g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ þ !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þ  ekt
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
ðjÞ
1 X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ  ekt
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ f   þ
C1  L1  VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
!2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt
þ g
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 g  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
þ  f 3
C1  L1 C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
g  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 
þ !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ  ekt þ f 4 g
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
þ !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þ  ekt g

ðjÞ
1 X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ 
C1  L1  VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ  ekt
þ 
C1  L1  VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ  ekt
þ 
C1  L1  VT C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 g  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc  1
  3 þ  !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ  ekt
C1  L1 C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C1  L1
1 g  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  1
  4 þ  !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þ  ekt
C1  L1 C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C1  L1

ðjÞ
fV1T  X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ  g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C1  L1  C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ 1
þf  þ
C 1  L 1  VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C1  L1  VT
!2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ

C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 1
þ  !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ þ  !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þg  ekt
C1  L1 C1  L1
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 557

At fixed point:
ðjÞ
fV1T  X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ  g3  ½g1 þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc   g4  ½g2 þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise g
¼0
C1  L1  C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ

1 !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ


tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ f 
C 1  L 1  VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ
þ 
C1  L1  VT C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 1
þ  !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ þ  !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þg  ekt
C1  L1 C1  L1

dY4 dY4
¼ tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ; ¼ y4  k  ekt
dt dt
1 !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ
 y4  k þ f 
C1  L1  VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ
þ 
C1  L1  VT C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 1
þ  !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ þ  !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þg ¼ 0
C1  L1 C1  L1

We build our system matrices ðiRb ; iCin ; iCout ; iL1 ; y3 ; y4 Þ and ðy1 ; y2 Þ

Rs 1
iRb  k  y1   iCin  ¼ 0; iCin  k þ y1 ¼ 0; iCout  k þ y2 ¼ 0
Rb Cin  Rb

iL1  k þ y3 ¼ 0; y3  k þ y4 ¼ 0

1 !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ


 y4  k þ f 
C1  L1  VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ
þ 
C1  L1  VT C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 1
þ  !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ þ  !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þg ¼ 0
C1  L1 C1  L1
558 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

0 1 0 1
m11iRb m12
B C B
0 1 B iCin C B m21
B C m22 C
C
i11 . . . i16 B C B C !
B . . C B iCout C B m31 m32 C
B . . . ... C B C B C y1
@ . AB CþB
B
C ¼ 0; i11 ¼ k;
B iL C B m41 m42 C
C y2
B 1C B C
i61 . . . i66 B C
B y3 C B m m52 C
@ A @ 51 A
y4 m61 m62
1
i12 ¼ 
Cin  Rb

i13 ¼ 0; i14 ¼ i15 ¼ i16 ¼ 0; i21 ¼ 0; i22 ¼ k; i23 ¼ i24 ¼ i25 ¼ i26 ¼ 0

i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k; i34 ¼ i35 ¼ i36 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ i42 ¼ i43 ¼ 0; i44 ¼ k; i45
¼ 1; i46 ¼ 0

i51 ¼ i52 ¼ i53 ¼ i54 ¼ 0; i55 ¼ k; i56 ¼ 1; i66 ¼ k. To find i16 ; . . .; i56 ; m61 ;
m62 , we need to do some analytic work with the expression:

1 !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ



C1  L1  VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ  C3 ðaf ; ar Þ  ðiCin  iRb Þ
þ 
C1  L1  VT C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 1
þ  !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ þ  !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þ
C1  L1 C1  L1
Rs
m11 ¼  ; m12 ¼ 0; m21 ¼ 1; m22 ¼ 0; m31 ¼ 0; m32 ¼ 1; m41 ¼ m42 ¼ 0; m51 ¼ m52
Rb
¼0

Assumption mlk ; l ¼ 1; . . .; 6; k ¼ 1; 2 elements are neglected compare to ilk ele-


ments l ¼ 1; . . .; 6; k ¼ 1; . . .; 6.
0 1 0 1
i11 ... i16 i11 . . . i16
B .. .. .. C B .. .. . C
ðA  k  IÞ ¼ @ . . . A; det ðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) det@ . . .. A ¼ 0
i61 ... i66 i61 . . . i66

To effectively apply the stability criterion of Lipunov to our system, we require a


criterion for when the equation detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 has a zero in the left half plane,
without calculating the eigenvalues explicit. We use criterion of Routh-Hurwitz
[2–4].
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 559

5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier Gummel-Poon Model


Analysis Under Parameters Variation

Class B amplifier is a type of power amplifier where the active device (transistor)
conducts only for one half cycle of the input signal. That means the conduction
angle is 180° for a Class B amplifier. Since the active device is switched off for half
the input cycle, the active device dissipates less power and hence the efficiency is
improved. Theoretical maximum efficiency of Class B power amplifier is 78.5 %. it
improves the power efficiency, it creates a lot of distortion. You can find class B
amplifier in the RF power amplifiers where the distortion is not a matter of major
concern. We use in our stability analysis The BJT NPN transistor Gummel-Poon
model since the input signal is large. The small signal S-parameters are not useful
for large-signal or high power circuit design such as power amplifier, mixers,
frequency converters because the active devices (transistor/FET/diode) in these
circuits usually operate in the nonlinear regions. In large signal circuits the voltage
and current variation will be large, for BJT this means the variation of the transistor
terminals voltages will be greater than VT. We must use large signal model of the
transistor, such as Ebers-Molls model, the Gummel-Poon model, the VBIC model.
The most popular large-signal model for BJT is the Spice Gummel Poon
(SGP) model. A more recent alternative to the SGP model is the Vertical Bipolar
Intercompany Model (VBIC) model which offers more accuracies as compared to
SGP model. The Spice Gummel Poon model is based on the device physics of
bipolar junction transistor. The Gummel Poon model is a compact model for bipolar
junction transistor which also takes into account effects of low currents and at high
level injection signal [91–93] (Fig. 5.5).
The base of the transistor Q1 is not biased and the negative half cycle of the
input waveform is missing in the output. Even though it improves the power

Fig. 5.5 Single ended class B amplifier


560 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

Fig. 5.6 Single ended class B amplifier equivalent circuit with BJT transistor Gummel-Poon
model

efficiency, it creates a lot of distortion. Only half the information present in the
input will be available in the output and that is a bad thing. Single ended Class B
amplifiers are not used in present day practical audio amplifier application and they
can be found only in some earlier gadgets. Another place where you can find them
is the RF power amplifiers where the distortion is not a matter of major concern.
The single ended class B amplifier equivalent circuit with BJT transistor
Gummel-Poon model is present in the below schematic. (Fig. 5.6).
The Gummel-Poon schematic equivalent circuit shows the large signal schematic
of the Gummel-Poon model. It represents the physical transistor, a current-controlled
output current sink, and two diode structures including their capacitors.

Iss qVBC Iss qVBE


Iss qVBE qVBC
Iec ¼  ðenr kB T  1Þ; Icc ¼  ðenf kB T  1Þ; Ict ¼ Icc  Iec ¼ ½enf kB T  enr kB T 
qb qb qb
Iec Iss qVBC I cc I ss
qVBE
I D1 ¼ ¼  ðenr kB T  1Þ; ID3 ¼ ¼  ðenf kB T  1Þ
br qb  br bf qb  b f
qVBC qVBE
ID2 ¼ C4  Iss  ðencl kB T  1Þ; ID4 ¼ C2  Iss  ðenel kB T  1Þ; IRc ¼ Irc ; IRs ¼ ICin ; ICout ¼ IRload

P
KCL @ (C): C ¼ C0 ; Irc ! e; VC0  VC ! e; IRc þ ICjx þ ICbc þ 2k¼1 IDk ¼ ICt þ ICcs
P
KCL @ (B): B ¼ B0 ; Irb ! e; VB0  VB ! e; ICin ¼ ICjx þ ICbc þ ICbe þ 4k¼1 IDk
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 561

P4
KCL @ (E): E ¼ E0 ; Ire ! e; VE  VE0 ! e; ICbe þ k¼3 IDk þ ICt ¼ IRe þ ICout

d d
ICjx ¼ Cjx  ðVB0  VC ÞjVB0 ¼VB ¼ Cjx  ðVB  VC Þ;
dt dt
d d
ICin ¼ Cin  ðVA1  VB0 ÞjVB0 ¼VB ¼ Cin  ðVA1  VB Þ
dt dt
d d
ICbc ¼ Cbc  ðVB  VC Þ; ICbe ¼ Cbe  ðVB  VE Þ;
dt dt
d d
ICout ¼ Cout  ðVE0  VA2 ÞjVE0 ¼VE ¼ Cout  ðVE  VA2 Þ
dt dt
dVc Vs ðtÞ  VA1 VA2 Vout
ICcs ¼ Ccs  ; IRs ¼ ; VA2 ¼ Vout ; IRload ¼ ¼ ; IC ¼ IRload
dt Rs Rload Rload out

Vcc  Vc0 Vcc  Vc VE0 VE


IR c ¼ jVc ¼Vc0 ¼ ; IRe ¼ jVE ¼VE0 ¼
Rc Rc Re Re

Gummel-Poon model parameters:


nf forward current emission coefficient.
nr reverse current emission coefficient.
qb variable model parameter (early and Kirk effects).
nel ; ncl ; C2 ; C4 model parameters responsible for low current effects.
kB T
q
thermal voltage. bf —forward current gain. br — reverse current
gain.
P
KCL @ (C): C ¼ C 0 ; Irc ! e; VC0  VC ! e; IRc þ ICjx þ ICbc þ 2k¼1 IDk ¼
ICt þ ICcs

Vcc  Vc d 1 qVBC qVBC


þ ½Cjx þ Cbc   ðVB  VC Þ þ Iss  ½  ðenr kB T  1Þ þ C4  ðencl kB T  1Þ
Rc dt qb  br
Iss nqVBE qVBC dV c
¼ ½e f kB T  enr kB T Þ þ Ccs  ; VBC ¼ VB  VC
qb dt

We define for simplicity new functions:

1 qVBC qVBC
n1 ðVBC Þ ¼ Iss  ½  ðenr kB T  1Þ þ C4  ðencl kB T  1Þ; n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ ICt
qb  b r
Iss nqV BE qVBC
¼  ½e f kB T  enr kB T 
qb

Vcc  Vc dVBC dVc


þ ½Cjx þ Cbc   þ n1 ðVBC Þ ¼ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ Ccs 
Rc dt dt
562 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

P4
KCL @ (B): B ¼ B0 ; Irb ! e; VB0  VB ! e; ICin ¼ ICjx þ ICbc þ ICbe þ k¼1 IDk

d d d
Cin  ðVA1  VB Þ ¼ Cjx  ðVB  VC Þ þ Cbc  ðVB  VC Þ
dt dt dt
d Iss qVBC
þ Cbe  ðVB  VE Þ þ  ðenr kB T  1Þ
dt qb  br
qVBC Iss qVBE
þ C4  Iss  ðencl kB T  1Þ þ  ðenf kB T  1Þ
qb  bf
qVBE
þ C2  Iss  ðenel kB T  1Þ

d dVBC dVBE
Cin  ðVA1  VB Þ ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc   þ Cbe  þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt dt dt
1 qVBC qVBC
n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ Iss  ½  ðenr kB T  1Þ þ C4  ðencl kB T  1Þ
qb  br
1 qVBE qVBE
þ Iss  ½  ðenf kB T  1Þ þ C2  ðenel kB T  1Þ
qb  b f

1 qVBE qVBE
n4 ðVBE Þ ¼ Iss  ½  ðenf kB T  1Þ þ C2  ðenel kB T  1Þ;
qb  bf
n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ n1 ðVBC Þ þ n4 ðVBE Þ
P4
KCL @ (E): E ¼ E0 ; Ire ! e; VE  VE0 ! e; ICbe þ k¼3 IDk þ ICt ¼ IRe þ ICout

d 1 qVBE qVBE
Cbe  ðVB  VE Þ þ Iss  ½  ðenf kB T  1Þ þ C2  ðenel kB T  1Þ
dt qb  bf
Iss qVBE qVBC VE VA2
þ ½enf kB T  enr kB T Þ ¼ þ
qb Re Rload

dVBE VE VA2
Cbe  þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ ;
dt Re Rload
dVBE VE d
Cbe  þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ Cout  ðVE  VA2 Þ
dt Re dt

VA2 d d
ICout ¼ IRload ) ¼ Cout  ðVE  VA2 Þ ) VA2 ¼ Rload  Cout  ðVE  VA2 Þ
Rload dt dt

Vs ðtÞ  VA1 d
IRs ¼ ICin ) ¼ Cin  ðVA1  VB Þ ) Vs ðtÞ  VA1
Rs dt
d
¼ Rs  Cin  ðVA1  VB Þ
dt
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 563

Summary of our system differential equations:

Vcc  Vc dVBC dVc


þ ½Cjx þ Cbc   þ n1 ðVBC Þ ¼ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ Ccs 
Rc dt dt

d dVBC dVBE
Cin  ðVA1  VB Þ ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc   þ Cbe  þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt dt dt
dVBE VE VA2
Cbe  þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ ;
dt Re Rload
dVBE VE d
Cbe  þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ Cout  ðVE  VA2 Þ
dt Re dt

d d
VA2 ¼ Rload  Cout  ðVE  VA2 Þ; Vs ðtÞ  VA1 ¼ Rs  Cin  ðVA1  VB Þ
dt dt

&&

VB ¼ VBE þ VE ; VC ¼ VCB þ VBE þ VE ; VBC ¼ VCB ; VCB ¼ VBC ; VC


¼ VBE  VBC þ VE

Vcc  ½VBE  VBC þ VE  dVBC


þ ½Cjx þ Cbc   þ n1 ðVBC Þ
Rc dt
d
¼ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ Ccs  ðVBE  VBC þ VE Þ
dt
Vcc  ½VBE  VBC þ VE  dVBC
þ ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs   þ n1 ðVBC Þ
Rc dt
dVBE dVE
¼ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ Ccs  þ Ccs 
dt dt
d dVBC dVBE
Cin  ðVA1  VBE  VE Þ ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc   þ Cbe  þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt dt dt
dVA1 dVE dVBC dVBE
Cin   Cin  ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc   þ ½Cbe þ Cin   þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt dt dt dt
dVBE VE VA2
Cbe  þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ ;
dt Re Rload
dVE dVA2
VA2 ¼ Rload  Cout   Rload  Cout 
dt dt
d
Vs ðtÞ  VA1 ¼ Rs  Cin  ðVA1  VBE  VE Þ ) Vs ðtÞ  VA1
dt
dVA1 dVBE dVE
¼ Rs  Cin   Rs  Cin   Rs  Cin 
dt dt dt
564 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

dVs ðtÞ dA0 dnðtÞ dnðtÞ


Vs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞjA0 nðtÞ  A0 ; ¼ þ j  e;
dt dt dt A0 nðtÞ dt
dVs ðtÞ
! e; !e
dt

Assumption IRs  Rs ! e ) VA1 Vs ðtÞ; dVdts ðtÞ ! e ) dtA1 ! e; Vs ðtÞ  VA1 ! e
dV

and we get the following system differential equations:

Vcc  ½VBE  VBC þ VE  dVBC


þ ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs   þ n1 ðVBC Þ
Rc dt
dVBE dVE
¼ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ Ccs  þ Ccs 
dt dt
dVE dVBC dVBE
Cin  ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc   þ ½Cbe þ Cin   þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ; Rs  Cin
dt dt dt
dVBE dVE
  Rs  Cin 
dt dt
¼0

dVBE VE VA2
Cbe  þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ ; VA2
dt Re Rload
dVE dVA2
¼ Rload  Cout   Rload  Cout 
dt dt
dVA1 dVBE dVE dVBE dVE
Rs  Cin  ð ! eÞ  Rs  Cin   Rs  Cin  ¼ 0; ¼
dt dt dt dt dt
We get the following set of system differential equations:

Vcc  ½VBE  VBC þ VE  dVBC


þ ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs   þ n1 ðVBC Þ ¼ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
Rc dt

dVBE dVBC dVBE


Cin  ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc   þ ½Cbe þ Cin   þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt dt dt
dVBE VE VA2
Cbe  þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ ;
dt Re Rload
dVBE dVA2
VA2 ¼ Rload  Cout   Rload  Cout 
dt dt

First differential equation:

Vcc  ½VBE  VBC þ VE  dVBC


þ ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs   þ n1 ðVBC Þ ¼ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
Rc dt
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 565

VE ¼ Vcc  VBE þ VBC  Rc  n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ Rc  n1 ðVBC Þ þ Rc  ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs 


dVBC

dt

Third differential equation:

dVBE VE VA2
Cbe  þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ
dt Re Rload

dVBE VA2
VE ¼ Cbe  Re  þ n4 ðVBE Þ  Re þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ  Re   Re
dt Rload

Combine of the first and third differential equations:

dVBC
Vcc  VBE þ VBC  Rc  n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ Rc  n1 ðVBC Þ þ Rc  ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs  
dt
dVBE VA2
¼ Cbe  Re  þ n4 ðVBE Þ  Re þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ  Re   Re
dt Rload

dVBC
Vcc  VBE þ VBC þ Rc  n1 ðVBC Þ þ Rc  ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs  
dt
dVBE VA2
¼ Cbe  Re  þ n4 ðVBE Þ  Re þ ½Re þ Rc   n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ   Re
dt Rload

We can summary our system reduced three differential equations:


dVBC
Vcc  VBE þ VBC þ Rc  n1 ðVBC Þ þ Rc  ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs  
dt
(1)
dVBE VA2
¼ Cbe  Re  þ n4 ðVBE Þ  Re þ ½Re þ Rc   n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ   Re
dt Rload
(2) Cin  dVdtBE ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc   dVdtBC þ ½Cbe þ Cin   dVdtBE þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dVA2
(3) VA2 ¼ Rload  Cout  dVdtBE  Rload  Cout  dt
dVA2 dVA2
(3) VA2 ¼ Rload  Cout  dVdtBE  Rload  Cout  dt ) dt ¼  dVdtBE  Rload1Cout  VA2
(2) Cin  dVdtBE ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc   dVdtBC þ ½Cbe þ Cin   dVdtBE þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ

dVBC dVBE
½Cjx þ Cbc   þ Cbe  þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ 0
dt dt
dVBE dVBC
) Cbe  ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc    n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt dt
dVBE Cjx þ Cbc dVBC 1
¼ ½    n ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt Cbe dt Cbe 3
566 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

dVBC
Vcc  VBE þ VBC þ Rc  n1 ðVBC Þ þ Rc  ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs  
dt
(1)
dVBE VA2
¼ Cbe  Re  þ n4 ðVBE Þ  Re þ ½Re þ Rc   n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ   Re
dt Rload

dVBC
Vcc  VBE þ VBC þ Rc  n1 ðVBC Þ þ Rc  ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs  
dt
Cjx þ Cbc dVBC
¼ Cbe  Re  f½ 
Cbe dt
1 VA2
þ  n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þg þ n4 ðVBE Þ  Re þ ½Re þ Rc   n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ   Re
Cbe Rload

dVBC
ðRc  ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs  þ Re  ½Cjx þ Cbc Þ  ¼ Re  n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ n4 ðVBE Þ  Re
dt
VA 2
þ ½Re þ Rc   n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ  Rc  n1 ðVBC Þ   Re  Vcc þ VBE  VBC
Rload

We define for simplicity global parameter C1 ¼ C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ

C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ ¼ ðRc  ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs  þ Re  ½Cjx þ Cbc Þ

dVBC Re Re
¼  n ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ n4 ðVBE Þ 
dt C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ 3 C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Re þ Rc Rc
þ½   n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ   n ðVBC Þ
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ 1
VA2 Re VBE  VBC  Vcc
  þ
Rload C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ

Re Re þ Rc
X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ ¼ ; X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ ¼ ; X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Rc
¼
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ

dVBC
¼ X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ n4 ðVBE Þ  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
dt
þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ  X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n1 ðVBC Þ
VA2 VBE  VBC  Vcc
  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ þ
Rload C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 567

dVBE Cjx þ Cbc


¼ ½   fX1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ n4 ðVBE Þ  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
dt Cbe
þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ  X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n1 ðVBC Þ
VA2 VBE  VBC  Vcc 1
  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ þ g  n ðVBE ; VBC Þ
Rload C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ Cbe 3

dVA2 Cjx þ Cbc


¼½   fX1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ n4 ðVBE Þ  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
dt Cbe
V A2
þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ  X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n1 ðVBC Þ   X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Rload
VBE  VBC  Vcc 1 1
þ gþ  n ðVBE ; VBC Þ   V A2
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ Cbe 3 Rload  Cout

We define three functions:

w1 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ


þ n4 ðVBE Þ  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
VA2
 X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n1 ðVBC Þ   X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Rload
VBE  VBC  Vcc
þ
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ

Cjx þ Cbc
w2 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½   fX1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
Cbe
þ n4 ðVBE Þ  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
VA2
 X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n1 ðVBC Þ   X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Rload
VBE  VBC  Vcc 1
þ g  n ðVBE ; VBC Þ
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ Cbe 3

Cjx þ Cbc
w3 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½   fX1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
Cbe
þ n4 ðVBE Þ  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
VA2
 X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  n1 ðVBC Þ   X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Rload
VBE  VBC  Vcc 1 1
þ gþ  n ðVBE ; VBC Þ   VA 2
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ Cbe 3 Rload  Cout

Our system differential equations: dVBC


dt ¼ w1 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ
568 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

dVBE dVA2
¼ w2 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ; ¼ w3 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ
dt dt
dVA2
To find system fixed points: dVBC
dt ¼ 0; dVBE
dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0
 
w1 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ 0; w2 ðVBE
 
; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ 0; w3 ðVBE
 
; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ 0

Fixed point and linearization: We approximate our system phase portrait near a
 
fixed point VBE ; VBC ; VA2 by corresponding it as a linear system.
We consider the system dVdtBC ¼ w1 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ; dVdtBE ¼ w2 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ
dVA2  
¼ w3 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ and suppose that ðVBE
dt ; VBC ; VA2 Þ is a fixed point, i.e.,
       
w1 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ ¼ 0; w2 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ ¼ 0; w3 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ ¼ 0. Let u ¼
 
VBC  VBC v ¼ VBE  VBE ; w ¼ VA2  VA2 denote the components of a small dis-
turbance from the fixed point. To see whether the disturbance grows or decays, we
dVA2
dt ¼ dt ; dt ¼ dt ; dt ¼ dt
dVBC dv dVBE dw
need to derive differential equations for u, v, and w. du
 
Since VBE ; VBC ; VA2 are constants. By substitution:

du dVBC  
¼ ¼ w1 ðv þ VBE ; u þ VBC ; w þ VA2 Þ ¼ w1 ðVBE
 
; VBC ; VA2 Þ
dt dt
@w1 @w1 @w1
þu  þv  þw  þ Oðu2 ; v2 ; w2 ; uvw; . . .Þ
@VBC @VBE @VA2

  @w1 @w1 @w1


Since w1 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ ¼ 0 then du
dt ¼ dVdtBC ¼ u  @V BC
þ v  @V BE
þ w  @V A
þ
2

Oðu2 ; v2 ; w2 ; . . .Þ.
 
The partial derivatives are to be evaluated at the fixed point ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ and
they are numbers and not functions. Also the shorthand notation Oðu2 ; v2 ; w2 ; . . .Þ:
Denotes quadratic terms in u, v, and w and it extremely small. Similarly we find
@w2 @w2 @w3
dv
dt ¼ dt ¼ u  @VBC þ v  @VBE þ w  @VA þ Oðu ; v ; w ; . . .Þ and the expression
dVBE 2 2 2
2
dVA2 @w3 @w3 @w3
dw
dt ¼ dt ¼ u  @VBC
þ v  @V BE
þ w  @VA
þ Oðu2 ; v2 ; w2 ; . . .Þ. We denote (u, v, w) a
2
disturbance [2–4].
0 1
du 0 @w 1 0 1
B dt C 1 @w1 @w1
B C @V @VBE @VA2 u
B dv C B @wBC2 @w2 @w2 C B C
B C B C  @ v A þ quadratic term
B dt C ¼ @ @VBC @VBE @VA2 A
B C @w3 @w3 @w3
@ dw A @VBC @VBE @VA2
w
dt
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 569

0 @w1 @w1 @w1 1


@V @VBE @VA2
B @wBC2 @w2 @w2 C
The matrix A ¼ B C is called the Jacobian matrix at
@ @VBC @VBE @VA2 A
@w3 @w3 @w3
@VBC @VBE @VA2  ;V  ;V  Þ
ðVBE BC A 2
 
the fixed point ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ.
The quadratic terms are tiny and we neglect them
altogether. We obtain the linearized system.
0 1
du 0 @w 1
B dt C 1 @w1 @w1
B C @VBC @VBE @VA2
B dv C B @w2 @w2 @w2 C
B C B C
B dt C ¼ @ @VBC @VBE @VA2 A
B C @w3 @w3 @w3
@ dw A @VBC @VBE @VA2
dt

@w1 @n ðVBE ; VBC Þ @n ðVBE ; VBC Þ


¼ X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  3 þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  2
@VBC @VBC @VBC
@n1 ðVBC Þ 1
 X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  
@VBC C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ

@n1 ðVBC Þ q 1 qVBC C4 nqVkBCT @n1 ðVBC Þ


¼ Iss  ½  enr kB T þ  e cl B ;
@VBC kB  T qb  br  nr ncl @VBC
@n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
¼
@VBC

@n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ Iss q qVBC


¼   enr kB T ;
@VBC qb nr  k B  T
@n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ q 1 qVBC C4 nqVkBCT
¼ Iss  ½  enr kB T þ  e cl B 
@VBC kB  T qb  br  nr ncl

@w1 @n ðVBE ; VBC Þ @n4 ðVBE Þ


¼ X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  3 þ  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
@VBE @VBE @VBE
@n ðVBE ; VBC Þ 1
þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .  2 þ
@VBE C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ

@n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ q 1 qVBE


C2 nqVkBET
¼ Iss  ½  enf kB T þ  e el B 
@VBE k B  T qb  b f  nf nel

@n4 ðVBE Þ q 1 qVBE


C2 nqVkBET @n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
¼ Iss  ½  enf kB T þ  e el B ;
@VBE kB  T qb  bf  nf nel @VBE
@n4 ðVBE Þ
¼
@VBE
570 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

@n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ Iss q qVBE


@w1 1
¼   enf kB T ; ¼  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
@VBE qb nf  k B  T @VA2 Rload

@w2 Cjx þ Cbc @n ðVBE ; VBC Þ @n ðVBE ; VBC Þ


¼ ½   fX1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  3 þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  2
@VBC Cbe @VBC @VBC
@n1 ðVBC Þ 1 1 @n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
 X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ   g 
@VBC C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ Cbe @VBC

@w2 Cjx þ Cbc @n ðVBE ; VBC Þ @n4 ðVBE Þ


¼ ½   fX1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  3 þ  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
@VBE Cbe @VBE @VBE
@n ðVBE ; VBC Þ 1 1 @n ðVBE ; VBC Þ
þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  2 þ g  @VBE 3
@VBE C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ Cbe @VBE

@w2 Cjx þ Cbc 1


¼½   X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
@VA2 Cbe Rload

@w3 Cjx þ Cbc @n ðVBE ; VBC Þ @n ðVBE ; VBC Þ


¼½   fX1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  3 þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  2
@VBC Cbe @VBC @VBC
@n1 ðVBC Þ 1 1 @n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
 X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ   gþ 
@VBC C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ Cbe @VBC

@w3 Cjx þ Cbc @n ðVBE ; VBC Þ @n4 ðVBE Þ


¼½   fX1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  3 þ  X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
@VBE Cbe @VBE @VBE
@n ðVBE ; VBC Þ 1 1 @n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ  2 þ gþ 
@VBE C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ Cbe @VBE

@w3 Cjx þ Cbc 1 1


¼ ½   X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ 
@VA2 Cbe Rload Rload  Cout

We already found matrix A. The eigenvalues of a matrix A are given by the


characteristic equation detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0, where I is the identity matrix 3 × 3.
0 1
@w1 @w1 @w1 0 1
@V
B @wBC2
@VBE @VA2
C k 0 0
B @w2 @w2 C
AkI ¼ @ @VBC @VBE @VA2 A @ 0 k 0A
@w3 @w3 @w3 0 0 k
@VBC @VBE @VA2  ;V  ;V  Þ
ðVBE BC A 2

0 @w1 @w1 @w1 1


@VBC  k @VBE @VA2
B @w2 @w2 @w2 C
B C
AkI ¼ @ @VBC @VBE  k @VA2 A
@w3 @w3 @w3
@VBC @VBE @VA2  k  ;V  ;V  Þ
ðVBE BC A 2
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 571

0 @w2 @w2
1
@w1 @VBE k @VA2
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ ð  kÞðV  ;V  ;V  Þ  det@ A
@VBC BE BC A2 @w3 @w3
k
@VBE @VA2  ;V  ;V  Þ
ðVBE BC A
0 @w2 @w2
1 2

@w1 @VBC @VA2


ð Þ     det@ A
@VBE ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ @w3 @w3
k
@VBC @VA2  ;V  ;V  Þ
ðVBE BC A
!
2
@w2 @w2
@w1 @VBC @VBE  k
þð Þ     det
@VA2 ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ @w3 @w3
@VBC @VBE  ;V  ;V  Þ
ðVBE BC A 2

@w1 @w @w @w3 @w2


detðA  k  IÞ ¼ ð  kÞðV  ;V  ;V  Þ  ½ð 2  kÞ  ð 3  kÞ      
@VBC BE BC A2 @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2 ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
@w @w @w @w3 @w2
 ð 1 ÞðV  ;V  ;V  Þ  ½ 2  ð 3  kÞ      
@VBE BE BC A2 @VBC @VA2 @VBC @VA2 ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
@w @w @w3 @w3 @w
þ ð 1 ÞðV  ;V  ;V  Þ  ½ 2    ð 2  kÞðV  ;V  ;V  Þ
@VA2 BE BC A2 @VBC @VBE @VBC @VBE BE BC A2

@w1 @w @w3 @w3 @w2


detðA  k  IÞ ¼ ð  kÞðV  ;V  ;V  Þ  ½ð 2    Þ
@VBC BE BC A2 @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2
@w @w3 @w
ð 2 þ Þ  k þ k2 ðV  ;V  ;V  Þ  ð 1 ÞðV  ;V  ;V  Þ
@VBE @VA2 BE BC A2 @VBE BE BC A2
@w @w3 @w3 @w2 @w2
 ½ð 2    Þ  kðV  ;V  ;V  Þ
@VBC @VA2 @VBC @VA2 @VBC BE BC A2

@w1 @w2 @w3 @w3 @w2 @w3


þð Þ     ½ð    Þþ  kðV  ;V  ;V  Þ
@VA2 ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ @VBC @VBE @VBC @VBE @VBC BE BC A2

@w1 @w @w3 @w3 @w2 @w1 @w @w3


detðA  k  IÞ ¼ ½ ð 2    Þ ð 2 þ Þk
@VBC @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2 @VBC @VBE @VA2
@w1 @w @w3 @w3 @w2
þ  k2  ð 2    Þk
@VBC @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2
@w @w3 @w @w @w3
þð 2 þ Þ  k2  k3 ðV  ;V  ;V  Þ  ½ð 1 Þ  ð 2 
@VBE @VA2 BE BC A2 @VBE @VBC @VA2
@w3 @w2 @w @w2
  Þ    þ ½ð 1 Þ      k
@VBC @VA2 ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ @VBE @VBC ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
@w @w @w3 @w3 @w2 @w @w3
þ ½ð 1 Þ  ð 2    Þþð 1Þ   kðV  ;V  ;V  Þ
@VA2 @VBC @VBE @VBC @VBE @VA2 @VBC BE BC A2
572 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

@w1 @w @w3
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ k3 þ ½ þð 2 þ Þ     k2
@VBC @VBE @VA2 ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
@w @w3 @w1 @w @w3
þ ½ð 1 Þ   ð 2 þ Þ
@VA2 @VBC @VBC @VBE @VA2
@w @w3 @w3 @w2 @w @w2
ð 2    Þþð 1 Þ      k
@VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VBC ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
@w @w @w3 @w3 @w2
þ½ 1  ð 2    Þ
@VBC @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2
@w @w @w3 @w3 @w2
ð 1Þð 2    Þ
@VBE @VBC @VA2 @VBC @VA2
@w @w @w3 @w3 @w2
þð 1Þ  ð 2    Þ   
@VA2 @VBC @VBE @VBC @VBE ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ

The eigenvalues of a matrix A are given by the characteristic equation


P
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 3k¼0 Nk  kk ¼ 0.

@w1 @w @w3
N3 ¼ 1; N2 ¼ ½ þð 2 þ Þ   
@VBC @VBE @VA2 ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
@w @w3 @w1 @w @w3
N1 ¼ ½ð 1 Þ   ð 2 þ Þ
@VA2 @VBC @VBC @VBE @VA2
@w @w3 @w3 @w2 @w @w2
ð 2    Þþð 1 Þ     
@VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VBC ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ

@w1 @w @w3 @w3 @w2 @w @w @w3 @w3 @w2


N0 ¼ ½ ð 2    Þð 1Þð 2    Þ
@VBC @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VBC @VA2 @VBC @VA2
@w @w @w3 @w3 @w2
þð 1Þ  ð 2    Þ   
@VA2 @VBC @VBE @VBC @VBE ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ

We get three eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, λ3) for our system and need to classify them. If
 
k1 ; k2 ; k3 2 R then our fixed point VBE ; VBC ; VA2 is classify in the below Table 5.2

Table 5.2 Single ended class B amplifier system eigenvalues and stability classification
 
System eigenvalues Stability classification VBE ; VBC ; VA2
λ1 > 0, λ2 > 0, λ3 > 0 Unstable node
λ1 > 0, λ2 > 0, λ3 < 0 Saddle point
λ1 > 0, λ2 < 0, λ3 < 0 Saddle point
λ1 < 0, λ2 < 0, λ3 < 0 Stable node

If k1 ; k2 2 C; k1 ¼ g1 þ i  g2 ; k2 ¼ g1  i  g2 ; g1 ; g2 2 R; k3 2 R then our fixed


 
point VBE ; VBC ; VA2 is classify in the below table
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 573

 
System eigenvalues Stability classification VBE ; VBC ; VA2
g1 [ 0; k3 [ 0 Unstable spiral node
g1 [ 0; k3 \0 Unstable spiral saddle
g1 \0; k3 [ 0 Unstable spiral saddle
g1 \0; k3 \0 Stable spiral node

If k1 ; k2 \0; k3 ¼ 0 or k1 ; k3 \0; k2 ¼ 0 or k2 ; k3 \0; k1 ¼ 0 then we get


attracting line. If k1 ; k2 [ 0; k3 ¼ 0 or k1 ; k3 [ 0; k2 ¼ 0 or k2 ; k3 [ 0; k1 ¼ 0 then
we get repelling line.

5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative


Feedback Circuit Stability Analysis Under Circuit’s
Parameters Variation

When we want to amplify a very low power signal, we use Low Noise Amplifier
(LNA). It is done without degrading its signal to noise ratio (SNR). LNA device is a
crucial element in every RF receiver system and it amplifies the signal that comes
from the antenna. Regular amplifier will increase the power of both the signal and the
noise which come from the antenna and present at the amplifier’s input. Additionally
amplifiers are not ideal and they add noise to the input signal. Low Noise Amplifiers
(LNAs) are designed to minimize the additional noise. The target is to minimize the
additional noise by considering tradeoffs that include impedance matching. choosing
the amplifier technology, and selecting low-noise biasing conditions. Low-noise
amplifiers are found in many radio communications systems, medical instruments,
and electronic equipments. The conventional LNA operates on a single band, while
wideband LNA operate typically from 100 MHz to 1GHz and it hard to design. It is a
challenge to design broadband amplifier with the best performances. One architecture
is the combination of several narrows band LNA circuit into a single wideband LNA
circuit. LNA feedback technique is proposed to simultaneously achieve improvement
in bandwidth and on its gain, noise figure and return loss. The negative feedback
technique can be used in wideband amplifier to provide a flat gain response and to
reduce the input and output VSWR. It controls the amplifier performance due to
technical specifications variation from transistor to transistor and in band stability is
also improved by employing negative feedback. The LNA is most important block in
any receiving system because the receiving system sensitivity is generally determined
by its gain and noise figure. LNAs figures of merit are reduced Noise Figure (NF),
moderated gain, good input/output impedance matching, low power consumption,
isolation between input and output, acceptable linearity (low distortion), and stability.
There are many ways to design LNAs. It can be single ended or differential, single
stage, multistage, depending on type of engineering application and applications.
Typical single end LNA system is a two stage single ended LNA. The first stage
cascode amplifier is chosen for its simple input matching, its higher gain compared to
574 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

an inductively degenerated common emitter amplifier, and its high reverse isolation
and higher stability compared to a common base counterpart. The second stage
consists of a common emitter cascode amplifier without emitter degeneration for
higher gain. Differential LNA is composed of two stages. The first stage is a dif-
ferential cascode amplifier using LC impedance peaking network as load. This load
impedance can be made very large across the desired frequency band in order to force
the output current to flow into the following stage. In practice the series resistance in
the transmission line inductor will limit the impedance peaking effect. The second
stage is a conventional emitter coupled differential amplifier with high common mode
rejection. It is used to amplify the desired signal and compress the common mode
signal. The two stages are connected by a coupling capacitor C. The single ended
architecture has one disadvantage that it is very sensitive to parasitic ground
inductance. A differential LNA can beneficial while the noise figure is higher than
single ended design. We get higher gain by using multi stage LNA but the problem is
that is difficult to maintain stability than single stage LNA. The selection of design
option depends on type of application and specific design targets. The wideband
LNA is required to be in single stage, low power consumption, and minimum
components. The most important design considerations in a LNA design are stability,
noise, power gain, bandwidth, and DC requirements. The DC biasing circuit is used
to bias the selected transistor and the input and output matching network is important
for maximum power transfer in the circuit. LNAs operate in class A mode, charac-
terized by a bias point at the center of maximum voltage and current of the bias
supply for the transistor. The biasing point for the LNA should have high gain, low
noise figure, linear, good input and output matching and stable at the lowest current
drain from the supply. In designing LNAs, stability of the circuit is important pa-
rameter. This stability characteristic means that the device does not oscillate over a
range of frequencies with any combination of source and load impedance. The next
figure describes the block diagram of LNA [121, 122] (Fig. 5.7).
BJT technology is selected to design the wideband low noise amplifier due to the
higher gain at low power consumption, with reasonable low noise figure.
The RC feedback is the one of the most popular techniques to be used in
amplifiers circuit for its wideband input match and good linearity. The schematic of
the LNA is shown in the below figure. The transistor is self biased with the biasing
resistor of R1 and R2 and designed to low power product application. (Fig. 5.8).
The LNA design has implemented RLC feedback (L1, R3, C1) in order to lower
the gain at the lower frequencies and hence improve the stability of the circuit. We
need to tune the RLC feedback banch in order to meet the design specifications.
The LNA design also employs output resistive loading in stabilizing the circuit. The
initial output resistor value R4 is set to less than 50 Ω because high output resistor
value may result in huge decrease of gain and P1 dB point. L2 and L3 in the circuit
acts as RF choke which separate RF and DC path in the circuit. The LNA is
matched using lumped element as it is simple and compact (L matching network).
Typical LC matching network include the use of capacitors and inductors in either
series or shunt configuration. Circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT
Small Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. We consider “AC ground“ in the
circuit. Since the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there is no time
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative … 575

Fig. 5.7 Block diagram of LNA

Fig. 5.8 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with input and output matching network
schematics

variation of the voltage. Consequently. We can set this terminal to be an “AC


ground” in the small signal circuit. For AC ground, we “kill” the DC sources at that
terminal (short circuit voltage sources and open circuit current sources). Input and
output matching networks are L-type. Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions,
the BJT can be replaced with linear Hybrid Pi model. Let’s verify that this circuit
incorporates all the necessary Small Signal (SS) characteristics of BJT: ib ¼
vbe =rp ; ic ¼ gm  vbe ; ib þ ic ¼ ie [24–26] (Fig. 5.9, Table 5.3).
576 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

Fig. 5.9 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with SS hybrid PI model and matching networks

Table 5.3 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with SS hybrid PI model and matching
networks KCL@ node and expressions
KCL @ node Expression
A1 IRs ¼ ICin þ ILin
A2 ILin ¼ Irp þ IL1 þ IL2
A3 IL1 ¼ IR3
A4 IR3 ¼ IC1
A5 IC1 þ IL3 ¼ IR4 þ gm  vBE
A6 IL2 ¼ IR2
A7 IR2 ¼ IR1 þ IL3
A8 IR4 ¼ ICout þ ILout
A9 ILout ¼ IRload

Vs ðtÞ  VA1 dVA1 dIL VA


IRs ¼ ; ICin ¼ Cin  ; VLin ¼ VA1  VA2 ¼ Lin  in ; Irp ¼ 2
Rs dt dt rp
dIL1 VA3  VA4 d dVC1
VL1 ¼ VA2  VA3 ¼ L1  ; IR3 ¼ ; IC1 ¼ C1  ðVA4  VA5 Þ ¼ C1 
dt R3 dt dt
dIL2 VA6  VA7 VA7 dIL
VL2 ¼ VA2  VA6 ¼ L2  ; IR2 ¼ ; IR1 ¼ ; VL3 ¼ VA7  VA5 ¼ L3  3
dt R2 R1 dt
VA5  VA8 dVA8 dIL
IL1 ¼ IR3 ¼ IC1 ; IL2 ¼ IR2 ; IR4 ¼ ; ICout ¼ Cout  ; VLout ¼ VA8  VA9 ¼ Lout  out
R4 dt dt
Vout VA9
IRload ¼ ¼ ; IL ¼ IRload
Rload Rload out
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative … 577

Vs ðtÞ  VA1
IRs ¼ ) IRs  Rs ¼ Vs ðtÞ  VA1 ) VA1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs
Rs
d dVs ðtÞ dIRs dIL
ICin ¼ Cin  ðVs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs Þ ¼ Cin  ð   Rs Þ; VA1  VA2 ¼ Lin  in
dt dt dt dt
dILin dILin VA2
VA2 ¼ VA1  Lin  ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  Lin  ; I rp ¼ ) V A 2 ¼ I rp  r p
dt dt rp
dIL dIL dIL
Irp  rp ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  Lin  in ; VA2  VA3 ¼ L1  1 ) VA3 ¼ VA2  L1  1
dt dt dt
dIL1 VA 3  VA 4
VA3 ¼ Irp  rp  L1  ; IR 3 ¼
dt R3
) IR3  R3 ¼ VA3  VA4 ) VA4 ¼ VA3  IR3  R3
dIL d
VA4 ¼ Irp  rp  L1  1  IR3  R3 ; IC1 ¼ C1  ðVA4  VA5 Þ
dt dt
d dIL
¼ C1  ðIrp  rp  L1  1  IR3  R3  VA5 Þ
dt dt

dIrp d 2 IL dIR dVA5 dIL


IC1 ¼ C1  ð  r p  L1  2 1  3  R 3  Þ; VA2  VA6 ¼ L2  2 ) VA6
dt dt dt dt dt
dIL
¼ VA2  L2  2
dt

dIL2 VA  VA7
VA6 ¼ Irp  rp  L2  ; IR 2 ¼ 6
dt R2
dIL2
) IR2  R2 ¼ VA6  VA7 ¼ Irp  rp  L2   IR1  R1
dt
VA7
IR1 ¼ ) VA7 ¼ IR1  R1 ; IR2  R2
R1
dIL dIL
¼ Irp  rp  L2  2  IR1  R1 ; VA7  VA5 ¼ L3  3
dt dt
dIL3 dIr d 2 IL dIR dVA7 d 2 IL
VA 5 ¼ VA 7  L 3  ; IC1 ¼ C1  ð p  rp  L1  2 1  3  R3  þ L3  2 3 Þ
dt dt dt dt dt dt
dIrp d 2 IL1 dIR3 dIR1 d 2 IL3
VA 7 ¼ IR1  R1 ) IC1 ¼ C1  ð  rp  L1  2   R3   R1 þ L3  2 Þ
dt dt dt dt dt
VA5  VA8 dVA8
IR 4 ¼ ) IR4  R4 ¼ VA5  VA8 ) VA8 ¼ VA5  IR4  R4 ; ICout ¼ Cout 
R4 dt
dVA5 dIR4
¼ Cout  ð   R4 Þ
dt dt
578 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

dIL3 dIR d 2 IL dIR


VA5 ¼ IR1  R1  L3  ) ICout ¼ Cout  ð 1  R1  L3  2 3  4  R4 Þ
dt dt dt dt
dILout dILout VA 9
VA8  VA9 ¼ Lout  ) VA8 ¼ VA9 þ Lout  ; IRload ¼ ) VA9 ¼ IRload  Rload
dt dt Rload
dIL dVA8 dIR d 2 ILout
VA8 ¼ IRload  Rload þ Lout  out ; ICout ¼ Cout  ¼ Cout  ð load  Rload þ Lout  Þ
dt dt dt dt2
dVA8 dIL d 2 ILout
IRload ¼ ILout ) ICout ¼ Cout  ¼ Cout  ð out  Rload þ Lout  Þ
dt dt dt2

Additional equations: IL1 ¼ IR3 ¼ IC1 ; IL2 ¼ IR2 :


We can summary our wideband LNA with negative feedback circuit differential
equation:
[I] ICin ¼ Cin  ðdVdts ðtÞ  dIdtRs  Rs Þ, [II] Irp  rp ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  Lin  dtLin :
dI

dIR2
[III] IR2  R2 ¼ Irp  rp  L2  dt  IR1  R1
dIrp d2 I dI dI d2 I
[IV] IC1 ¼ C1  ð dt  rp  L1  dtC2 1  dtC1  R3  dtR1  R1 þ L3  dt2L3 Þ
dI d2 I dI dI
[V] ICout ¼ Cout  ð dtR1  R1  L3  dt2L3  dtR4  R4 Þ, [VI] ICout ¼ Cout  ð dtLout  Rload þ
d 2 ILout
Lout  dt2 Þ
d 2 IL3 dIR1 dIR4
[IV] + [V] L3  dt2 ¼ dt  R1  dt  R4  ICout  C1out

dIrp d 2 IC dIC1 dIR 1


I C1 ¼ C 1  ð  r p  L1  2 1   R3  4  R4  ICout  Þ
dt dt dt dt Cout

IRs ¼ ICin þ ILin ) ICin ¼ IRs  ILin ; IC1 þ IR2  IR1 ¼ IR4 þ gm  Irp  rp
IR1 ¼ IC1 þ IR2  gm  Irp  rp  IR4 ; IR4 ¼ ICout þ ILout ) ICout ¼ IR4  ILout

We can summary our system differential equations:


[I] IRs  ILin ¼ Cin  ðdVdts ðtÞ  dIdtRs  Rs Þ, [II] Irp  rp ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  Lin  dtLin :
dI

dIR2
[III] IR2  R2 ¼ Irp  rp  L2  dt  ½IC1 þ IR2  gm  Irp  rp  IR4   R1
d 2 IC1 dIC1 dIR4
[IV] + [V] IC1 ¼ C1  ðdIdtrp  rp  L1  dt2  dt  R3  dt  R4  ½IR4  ILout   C1out Þ
dI d2 I
[VI] IR4  ILout ¼ Cout  ð dtLout
 Rload þ Lout  dtL2out Þ
dI d2 I dI dI
We define new variables: Y1 ¼ dIdtrp ; Y2 ¼ dtC1 ; dYdt2 ¼ dtC2 1 ; Y3 ¼ dtR4 ; Y4 ¼ dtLout
[I] IRs  ILin ¼ Cin  ðdVdts ðtÞ  dIdtRs  Rs Þ, [II] Irp  rp ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  Lin  dtLin :
dI

dI
[III] IR2  R2 ¼ Irp  rp  L2  dtR2  ½IC1 þ IR2  gm  Irp  rp  IR4   R1
[IV] + [V] IC1 ¼ C1  ðY1  rp  L1  dYdt2  Y2  R3  Y3  R4  IR4  C1out þ ILout  C1out Þ
[VI] IR4  ILout ¼ Cout  ðY4  Rload þ Lout  dYdt4 Þ
We can summary our system differential equations:
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative … 579

dIrp dIC dIR dIL dIR


¼ Y1 ; 1 ¼ Y2 ; 4 ¼ Y3 ; out ¼ Y4 ; s
dt dt dt dt dt
1 dVs ðtÞ 1
¼   ðIRs  ILin Þ 
Rs dt Cin  Rs

dILin 1 Rs rp dY4 1 Rload


¼  Vs ðtÞ  IRs   Ir p  ; ¼ ðIR4  ILout Þ   Y4 
dt Lin Lin Lin dt Cout  Lout Lout

dIR2 R2 rp R1
¼ IR2  þ Irp   ½IC1 þ IR2  gm  Irp  rp  IR4  
dt L2 L2 L2

dY2 1 rp R3 R4 1 1
¼ IC1  þ Y1   Y2   Y3   IR4  þ ILout 
dt C1  L1 L1 L1 L1 Cout  L1 Cout  L1

dIrp dIC1 dIR4 dILout


At fixed points (equilibrium points): dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0;
dIRs
dt ¼0

dILin dIR dY2


¼ 0; 2 ¼ 0; ¼ 0; Y1 ¼ 0; Y2 ¼ 0; Y3 ¼ 0; Y4 ¼ 0; IRs  ILin
dt dt dt
dVs ðtÞ
¼ Cin 
dt

IRs  Rs þ Irp  rp ¼ Vs ðtÞ; IR4  ILout


1 1 1
¼ Y4  Rload  Cout ; IC 1   IR4  þ ILout  ¼0
C1 Cout Cout

IR2  R2 þ Irp  rp  ð1 þ gm  R1 Þ  IC 1  R1  IR2  R1 þ IR4  R1 ¼ 0

If dVdts ðtÞ ! e then IRs ¼ ILin :


Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the equi-
librium points of the wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with negative feedback
circuit equivalent circuit consists in adding to coordinate ½IRs ; ILin ; Irp ; IR2 ; IC1 ; IR4 ; ILout ;
Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4  arbitrarily small increments of exponentially form ½iRs ; iLin ; irp ; iR2 ; iC1 ;
iR4 ; iLout ; y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4   ekt and retaining the first order terms in IRs ; ILin ; Irp ; IR2 ; IC1 ; IR4 ;
ILout ; Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 . The system of homogenous equations leads to a polynomial
characteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The polynomial characteristic equations
accept by set of the below circuit variables, circuit variables derivative and circuit
variables second order derivative with respect to time into wideband Low Noise
Amplifier (LNA) with negative feedback [2–4]. Our wideband Low Noise Amplifier
(LNA) with negative feedback equivalent circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small
increments of exponential form ½iL1 ; iRb ; iRload ; iCout ; iCin ; y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4   ekt are: j = 0
(first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
580 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ;
ðjÞ
Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRs ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekt ; ILin ðtÞ ¼ ILin þ iLin  ekt ; Irp ðtÞ ¼ IrðjÞ
p
þ iRp  ekt ; IR2 ðtÞ ¼ IR2 þ iR2  ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ dIrp ðtÞ
IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IC1 þ iC1  ekt ; IR4 ðtÞ ¼ IR4 þ iR4  ekt ; ILout ðtÞ ¼ ILout þ iLout  ekt ; ¼ iRp  k  ekt
dt
dILin ðtÞ dIR ðtÞ dY2 ðtÞ dY4 ðtÞ
¼ iLin  k  ekt ; 2 ¼ iR2  k  ekt ; ¼ y2  k  ekt ; ¼ y4  k  ekt
dt dt dt dt
dIC1 ðtÞ dIR ðtÞ dIL ðtÞ dIr ðtÞ
¼ iC1  k  ekt ; 4 ¼ iR4  k  ekt ; out ¼ iLout  k  ekt ; s ¼ iRs  k  ekt
dt dt dt dt

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


iRp  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y1 ¼ 0 ) iRp  k þ y1 ¼ 0; iC1  k  ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ;
ðjÞ
Y2 ¼ 0 ) iC1  k þ y2 ¼ 0

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


iR4  k  ekt ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ; Y3 ¼ 0 ) iR4  k þ y3 ¼ 0; iLout  k  ekt ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt ;
ðjÞ
Y4 ¼ 0 ) iLout  k þ y4 ¼ 0

1 dVs ðtÞ ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1


iRs  k  ekt ¼   ½IRs þ iRs  ekt   þ ½ILin þ iLin  ekt  
Rs dt Cin  Rs Cin  Rs

1 dVs ðtÞ ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 1


iRs  k  ekt ¼   IR s  þ ILin   iRs   ekt þ iLin
Rs dt Cin  Rs Cin  Rs Cin  Rs
1
  ekt
Cin  Rs
ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point: 1
Rs  dVdts ðtÞ  IRs  Cin1Rs þ ILin  Cin1Rs ¼ 0

1 1
iRs  k  iRs  þ iLin  ¼0
Cin  Rs Cin  Rs

1 ðjÞ Rs rp
iLin  k  ekt ¼  Vs ðtÞ  ½IRs þ iRs  ekt    ½IrðjÞ
p
þ iRp  ekt  
Lin Lin Lin

1 ðjÞ Rs rp Rs kt rp kt


iLin  k  ekt ¼  Vs ðtÞ  IRs   IrðjÞ
p
  iRs   e  iRp  e
Lin Lin Lin Lin Lin
ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point: L1in  Vs ðtÞ  IRs  LRins  Irp  Lrpin ¼ 0; iLin  k  iRs  LRins  iRp  Lrpin ¼ 0

ðjÞ ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ Rload


y4  k  ekt ¼ ðIR4 þ iR4  ekt  ILout  iLout  ekt Þ   ½Y4 þ y4  ekt  
Cout  Lout Lout
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative … 581

ðjÞ ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ Rload


y4  k  ekt ¼ ðIR4  ILout Þ   Y4 
Cout  Lout Lout
1 Rload kt
þ ðiR4  ekt  iLout  ekt Þ   y4  e
Cout  Lout Lout
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point: ðIR4  ILout Þ  Cout1Lout  Y4  RLload
out
¼0

1 1 Rload
y4  k þ iR4   iLout   y4  ¼0
Cout  Lout Cout  Lout Lout

ðjÞ R2 rp ðjÞ
iR2  k  ekt ¼ ½IR2 þ iR2  ekt   þ ½IrðjÞ
p
þ iRp  ekt    ½IC1 þ iC1  ekt
L2 L2
ðjÞ ðjÞ R1
þ IR2 þ iR2  ekt  gm  ðIrðjÞ
p
þ iRp  ekt Þ  rp  IR4  iR4  ekt  
L2

ðjÞ R2 rp ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ R1 R2


iR2  k  ekt ¼ IR2  þ IrðjÞ
p
  ½IC1 þ IR2  gm  IrðjÞ
p
 rp  IR4    iR2   ekt
L2 L2 L2 L2
rp kt R1
þ iRp   e  ½iC1  ekt þ iR2  ekt  gm  iRp  ekt  rp  iR4  ekt  
L2 L2

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


At fixed point: IR2  RL22 þ Irp  Lrp2  ½IC1 þ IR2  gm  Irp  rp  IR4   RL21 ¼ 0

R2 rp R1
iR2  k  iR2  þ iRp   ½iC1 þ iR2  gm  iRp  rp  iR4   ¼0
L2 L2 L2
R2 R1 rp R1 R1 R1
iR2  k  iR2   iR2  þ iRp  þ iRp  gm  rp   iC1  þ  iR ¼ 0
L2 L2 L2 L2 L2 L2 4

1 X 2
1 R1 R1
iR2  k  iR2   Rk þ iRp   rp  ð1 þ gm  R1 Þ  iC1  þ  iR ¼ 0
L2 k¼1 L2 L2 L2 4

ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ rp ðjÞ R3


y2  k  ekt ¼ ½IC1 þ iC1  ekt   þ ½Y1 þ y1  ekt    ½Y2 þ y2  ekt  
C1  L1 L1 L1
ðjÞ kt R4 ðjÞ kt 1 ðjÞ kt 1
 ½Y3 þ y3  e    ½IR4 þ iR4  e   þ ½ILout þ iLout  e  
L1 Cout  L1 Cout  L1
582 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ rp ðjÞ R3 ðjÞ R4


y2  k  ekt ¼ IC1  þ Y1   Y2   Y3 
C1  L1 L1 L1 L1
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 1
 IR4  þ ILout   i C1   ekt
Cout  L1 Cout  L1 C1  L1
rp R3 R4
þ y1   ekt  y2   ekt  y3   ekt
L1 L1 L1
1 1
 iR4   ekt þ iLout   ekt
Cout  L1 Cout  L1

At fixed point:

ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ rp ðjÞ R3 ðjÞ R4 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1


IC1  þ Y1   Y2   Y3   IR4  þ ILout 
C1  L1 L1 L1 L1 Cout  L1 Cout  L1
¼0

1 rp R3 R4
y2  k  ekt ¼ iC1   ekt þ y1   ekt  y2   ekt  y3   ekt  iR4
C1  L1 L1 L1 L1
1 kt 1 kt
  e þ iLout  e
Cout  L1 Cout  L1

1 rp R3 R4 1 1
y2  k  iC1  þ y1   y2   y3   iR4  þ iLout 
C1  L1 L1 L1 L1 Cout  L1 Cout  L1
¼0

We build our system matrices ðiRp ; iC1 ; iR4 ; iLout ; iRs ; iLin ; y4 ; iR2 ; y2 Þ and ðy1 ; y2 ; y3 Þ

iRp  k þ y1 ¼ 0; iC1  k þ y2 ¼ 0; iR4  k þ y3 ¼ 0; iLout  k þ y4 ¼ 0

1 1 Rs rp
iRs  k  iRs  þ iLin  ¼ 0; iLin  k  iRs   iRp  ¼0
Cin  Rs Cin  Rs Lin Lin

Rload 1 1
y4  k  y4  þ iR4   iLout  ¼0
Lout Cout  Lout Cout  Lout

1 X 2
1 R1 R1
iR2  k  iR2   Rk þ iRp   rp  ð1 þ gm  R1 Þ  iC1  þ  iR ¼ 0
L2 k¼1 L2 L2 L2 4

R3 1 rp R4 1 1
y2  k  y2   iC1  þ y1   y3   iR4  þ iLout 
L1 C1  L1 L1 L1 Cout  L1 Cout  L1
¼0
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative … 583

0 1 0 1
iRp m11 m12
B i C B m21 m22 C
B C1 C B C
B C
B iR4 C B m31 m32 C
B C B C
0 1 B C B m41 m42
C
i11 . . . i19 B Lout C B
i C !
B .. .. C B C B C
.. B iRs C þ B C
m51 m52 y1
@ . . . A  B C B C ¼ 0; i11 ¼ k; i12 ¼   
B C B C y3
i91 . . . i99 B iLin C B m61 m62 C
B C B C
B y4 C B m71 m72 C
B C B C
B C B C
@ iR A @
2
m81 m82 A
y2 m91 m92
¼ i19 ¼ 0; i21 ¼ 0; i22 ¼ k

i23 ¼    ¼ i28 ¼ 0; i29 ¼ 1; i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k; i34 ¼    ¼ i39 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ i42
¼ i43 ¼ 0; i44 ¼ k

1
i45 ¼ i46 ¼ 0; i47 ¼ 1; i48 ¼ i49 ¼ 0; i51 ¼ i54 ¼ 0; i55 ¼ k  ; i56
Cin  Rs
1
¼ ; i57 ¼ i58 ¼ i59 ¼ 0
Cin  Rs

rp Rs
i61 ¼  ; i62 ¼    ¼ i64 ¼ 0; i65 ¼  ; i66 ¼ k; i67 ¼    ¼ i69 ¼ 0; i71
Lin Lin
¼ i72 ¼ 0

1 1 Rload
i73 ¼ ; i74 ¼  ; i75 ¼ i76 ¼ 0; i77 ¼ k  ; i78 ¼ i79 ¼ 0
Cout  Lout Cout  Lout Lout

1 R1 R1
i81 ¼  rp  ð1 þ gm  R1 Þ; i82 ¼  ; i83 ¼ ; i84 ¼ i85 ¼ i86 ¼ i87 ¼ 0; i88
L2 L2 L2
1 X 2
¼ k   Rk
L2 k¼1

1 1 1
i89 ¼ 0; i91 ¼ 0; i92 ¼  ; i93 ¼  ; i94 ¼ ; i95 ¼ i96 ¼ i97
C1  L1 Cout  L1 Cout  L1
¼0

R3
i98 ¼ 0; i99 ¼ k  ; m11 ¼ 1; m12 ¼ 0; m21 ¼ 0; m22 ¼ 0; m31 ¼ 0; m32 ¼ 1
L1

m41 ¼ 0; m42 ¼ 0; m51 ¼ 0; m52 ¼ 0; m61 ¼ 0; m62 ¼ 0; m71 ¼ 0; m72 ¼ 0


584 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

rp R4
m81 ¼ 0; m82 ¼ 0; m91 ¼ ; m92 ¼ 
L1 L1

Assumption mlk ; l ¼ 1; . . .; 9; k ¼ 1; 2 elements are neglected compar to ilk ele-


ments l ¼ 1; . . .; 9; k ¼ 1; . . .; 9.
0 1 0 1
i11 ... i19 i11 . . . i19
B .. .. .. C B .. .. . C
ðA  k  IÞ ¼ @ . . . A; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) det@ . . .. A ¼ 0
i91 ... i99 i91 . . . i99

To effectively apply the stability criterion of Lipunov to our system, we require a


criterion for when the equation det ðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 has a zero in the left half plane,
without calculating the eigenvalues explicit. We use criterion of Routh-Hurwitz
[2–4].
BJT Small Signal (SS) equivalent circuit models:
In order to develop these BJT small signal models, there are two small signal
resistances that determine. These are rp the small signal, active mode input resis-
tance between the base and emitter, as “seen looking into the base” and re the small
signal, active mode output resistance between the base and emitter, “as looking into
the emitter”. These resistances are not the same because the transistor is not a
reciprocal device. The behavior of the BJT in the circuit changes if we interchange
the terminals. Determine rp : assuming the transistor in this circuit is operating in the
active mode, then we get BJT base current iB ¼ biC ¼ b1  ðIC þ VICT  vbe Þ; ib ¼
f f
IC
bf VT  vbe ¼ gbm  vbe . The iC DC section is IC and the AC section is IC
VT  vbe [33, 34]
f

(Fig. 5.10).

Fig. 5.10 BJT transistor


circuit with biasing voltages
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative … 585

Fig. 5.11 BJT transistor AC


small signal equivalent circuit
(version 1)

The AC small signal equivalent circuit is as follow: (Fig. 5.11).


Since the voltage at circuit terminal is held constant at Vcc, there is no time
variation of the voltage. Consequently, this terminal ca be an “AC ground” in the
small signal circuit. For AC grounds, we “kill” the DC sources at that terminal:
short circuit voltage sources an open current sources.
b
We get rp ¼ vibeb ¼ gmf ½X, this rp is the BJT active mode small signal input
resistance of the BJT between the base and the emitter as seen looking into the base
terminals. Determine re : We determine re following a similar procedure as for rp
but start with iE ¼ aiCf ¼ IaCf þ aicf ; ie ¼ aicf ¼ afIV
C
T
 vbe ; IE ¼ IaCf ; ie ¼ VIET  vbe ; iE ¼
IE þ ie . re is the BJT small signal resistance between the emitter and base seen
looking into the emitter. Mathematically, this is stated as re i ve
e
) ve ¼
a I a a
vbe ; re vibee ; re ¼ VIET ; gm ¼ VICT ¼ Vf T E ) VIET ¼ gmf ; re ¼ gmf  g1m ½X.
It can be shown that rp ¼ ðbf þ 1Þ  re ½X; rp 6¼ re . The active mode BJT is a non
reciprocal device (Fig. 5.12).

Fig. 5.12 BJT transistor AC


small signal (version 2)
586 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

There are two families of equivalent active mode BJT small signal circuit:
Hybrid Pi model and T model. Both are equally valid models but choosing one over
the other sometimes leads to simpler analysis of certain circuits.
Hybrid Pi model Version A: The circuit incorporates all of the necessary small
signal characteristics of the BJT ib ¼ vrbep ; ic ¼ gm  vbe ; ib þ ic ¼ ie ; ie ¼ vrbee
(Fig. 5.13).
Hybrid Pi model Version B: The second equivalent circuit is constructed by
using the following notation: gm  vbe ¼ gm  ðib  rp Þ ¼ gm  rp  ib ¼ bf  ib
(Fig. 5.14).
T model: The hybrid Pi model is the most popular small signal model for the
BJT. The alternative is the T model, which is useful in certain situations.
T model Version A: (Fig. 5.15).
T model Version B: (Fig. 5.16).
The small signal model for PNP BJTs are identically the same as for NPN
transistors. There is no change in any polarities (voltage or current) for the PNP
models relative to the NPN models. These small signal models are identically the
same.

Fig. 5.13 Equivalent active


mode BJT small signal circuit
Hybrid Pi model (version A)

Fig. 5.14 Equivalent active


mode BJT small signal circuit
Hybrid Pi model (version B)
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative … 587

Fig. 5.15 Equivalent active


model BJT small signal
circuit, T model (version A)

Fig. 5.16 Equivalent active


model BJT small signal
circuit, T model (version B)

Exercises

1. We have class AB push-pull variation amplifier circuit. The active elements


used in this circuit (Q1, D3 (Opto-coupler), and Q2) are almost complementary
symmetric transistors. Q1 is NPN phototransistor and Q2 is PNP transistor.
Pre-biasing is given to the transistor Q2 and LED D3 using the network com-
prising of resistors R1, R2 and the biasing diodes D1 and D2. Resistor rp is a
parasitic resistance between diodes D1 and D2. We use in our circuit analysis
588 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

BJT transistor Ebers-Moll model. The coupling coefficient between LED D3 and
photo transistor Q1 is “k” ðIBQ1 ¼ k  ID3 Þ. C1 and C2 are input DC decoupling
capacitors and input RF source Vs(t) with series resistance Rs. Hint: we use
analog optocoupler in our circuit.

1:1 Draw circuit class AB push-pull variation amplifier equivalent circuit and
write the related circuit differential equations (Use transistor Q1 and Q2
Ebers-Moll model).
1:2 Find circuit fixed points and discuss stability by parameters variation.
1:3 We short diode D1, How it influences circuit behavior and stability?
1:4 We define coupling  function between LED D3 current
 and photo transistor
PM k
Q1 base current IBQ1 ¼ k¼1 ID3  ak ; M 2 N . How parameters a1 ; a2 ;
. . .; aM influence on circuit behavior stability?
1:5 Diode D3 is disconnected, Find circuit differential equations and fixed
points. Discuss stability.
Exercises 589

2. We have class AB push-pull variation amplifier circuit. The active elements


used in this circuit are Q1, Q2, and D3, Q3 (Opto coupler). Q1 is NPN transistor
and Q2 is NPN photo transistor, Q3 is PNP transistor. Pre-biasing is given to the
transistor Q1, LED D3, and transistor Q3 using the network comprising of
resistors R1, R2, R3 and the biasing diodes D1 and D2. Resistor rp is the parasitic
resistance between diodes D1 and D2. We use in our analysis BJT transistor
Ebers-Moll model. The coupling coefficient between LED D3 and photo tran-
sistor Q2 is “k” parameter ðIBQ2 ¼ k  ID3 Þ.C1 and C2 are input DC decoupling
capacitors and input RF source Vs(t) with series resistance Rs. Hint: we use
analog optocoupler in our circuit.

2:1 Draw circuit class AB push-pull variation amplifier equivalent circuit and
write the related circuit differential equations. (Use transistors Q1, Q2, and
Q3 Ebers-Moll model.)
2:2 Find circuit fixed points and discuss stability by circuit parameters variation.
2:3 Resistor rp → ε, How it influences on circuit behavior and stability?
590 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

2:4 We define
 coupling function between diode D3 and
 photo transistor Q2 base
PP Ql
current IBQ2 ¼ l¼1 ½bl  k¼1 ID3  ak ; P 2 N . How parameters ak ; bl
k

influence on circuit behavior and stability?


2:5 We short diode D1, How it influence circuit behavior and stability? Find
circuit differential equations and fixed points.
3. We have power amplifier with two internal resonant circuits. The first resonant
circuit is connected to transistor Q1’s emitter (C1 and L1) and the second res-
onant circuit is connected to transistor Q1’s collector (C2 and L2). Resistor Rb is
transistor Q1’s base resistor and Cin, Cout are input and output blocking
capacitors. Input RF source is Vs(t) with series resistor Rs. Since the input RF
signal is a large signal, we use in our analysis the Ebers-Moll BJT model for
transistor Q1. The values of L1 and C1 or L2 and C2 are so selected that the
resonant circuit oscillates in the frequency of the input signal. Capacitors Cin,
Cout are input and output blocking capacitors. Assumption: dVdts ðtÞ ! e.

3:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability.
3:2 Inductor L2 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit behavior?
Find fixed points and circuit differential equations. Discuss stability.
3:3 Resistor Rb is changed by Γ1 multiplication factor ðRb ! Rb  C1 ; C1 2 RÞ.
We have two cases: (a) 0\C1 \1(b) C1 [ 1. How the dynamical behavior
Exercises 591

of the circuit is changed for cases (a) and (b)? Discuss stability for both
cases.
3:4 Capacitor C1 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit behavior? Find
fixed points and circuit differential equations. Discuss stability.
3:5 Capacitor C1 and inductor L1 are changed according the following trans-
formation: C1 ! C1  C2 ; L1 ! L1  C22 ; C2 [ 1; C2 [ 0; C2 2 R. How the
dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of
parameter Γ2? Discuss stability.
4. We have power amplifier with two internal resonant circuits. The first resonant
circuit is connected between the Vcc and Q1’s emitter (C1 and L1) and the second
resonant circuit is connected between Q1’s emitter and ground (C2 and L2). Rb is
transistor Q1’s base resistor and Cin, Cout are input and output blocking
capacitors. Input RF source is Vs(t) with series resistance Rs. Since the input RF
signal is a large signal, we use in our analysis the Ebers-Moll BJT model of Q1
transistor. Assumption: dVdts ðtÞ ! e.

4:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability.
4:2 Capacitor C2 is disconnected. Find fixed points and circuit differential
equations. Discuss stability.
4:3 Transistor Q1’s af ; ar parameters are changed by multiplication factors Γ1
and Γ2 respectively af ! af  C1 ; ar ! ar  C2 ; C1 ; C2 2 R. af : 0:95 !
0:99; 0:95
af  C1
0:99; ar : 0 ! 0:95; 0\ar  C2 \0:95; af [ ar .
How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of
592 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

Γ1 and Γ2 factors? Discuss stability for different values of Γ1 and Γ2 factors


C1 ; C2 [ 0.
4:4 Inductor L1 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit behavior? Find
fixed points and circuit differential equations. Discuss stability.
4:5 Capacitors C2 and inductor L2 are changed according to the following
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
transformations: C2 ! C2  C3 ; L1 ! L1  ð C3 þ C33 Þ; C3 [ 0; C3 2 R.
How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of
parameter Γ3? Discuss stability.
5. We have power amplifier with resonant circuit (C1 and L1) between transistor
Q1 emitter-collector, Q1’s emitter branch can be connected to resistor Re1 or
resistor Re2 and inductor Le (you choose it by S1 switch). Rb is the transistor Q1
base resistor and Cin, Cout are input and output blocking capacitors. Input RF
source is Vs(t) with series resistance Rs. Since the input RF signal is a large
signal we use in our analysis the Ebers-Moll BJT model for Q1. The values of
capacitors C1 and inductor L1 are selected that the resonant circuit is oscillated
in the frequency of the input signal. We have two cases in our circuit, case (a):
switch S1 at position (1), case (b): switch S2 at position (2). Assumption:
dVs ðtÞ
dt ! e

5:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability [two cases, S1 in position (1) and (2)].
5:2 Resistor Rc is changed by factor Ω1 ðRc ! Rc  X1 ; X1 [ 0; X1 2 RÞ. How
the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of Ω1
parameter? [Two cases: S1 in position (1) and (2)].
Exercises 593

5:3 Transistor Q1’s af ; ar parameters are changed by multiplication Γ1 and Γ2


pffiffiffiffiffiffi
factors respectively af ! af  C1 ; ar ! ar  C2 ; C1 ; C2 2 R. af : 0:95 !
0:99; 0:95
af  C1
0:99; ar : 0 ! 0:95; 0\ar  C2 \0:95; af [ ar . How
the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of Γ1
and Γ2 factors? Discuss stability for different values of Γ1 and Γ2 factors
C1 ; C2 [ 0:
5:4 Capacitors C1 and inductor L1 are changed according to the following
pffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffi
transformation: C1 ! C1  C3 ; L1 ! L1  ð 3 C3 þ C23 Þ C3 [ 0; C3 2 R.
How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of
parameter Γ3? Discuss stability.
5:5 Inductor L1 is disconnected. How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is
changed? [Cases: (1) and (2)]. Discuss stability.
6. We have power amplifier system which constructed from two BJT NPN tran-
sistors Q1 and Q2, peripheral components. Capacitors Cin and Cout are input and
output blocking capacitors. Transistor Q2 is RF transistor, L2 is radio frequency
choke which isolated the RF form the DC source Vcc. DC voltage source Vcc is
between 2v to 48v. The bias input at junction A to transistor Q2 having the
desired DC and RF impedance characteristics which will allow linear amplifi-
cation of RF frequencies over a wide power range. The biasing circuit has two
portions: one functioning essentially only at low power level and another por-
tion with the one portion functioning at increasing to high power level with a
smooth and continuous transition between them. Diode D2 is a constant current
diode, resistor R3 (low power level portion). Additionally resistor R1, inductor
L1, and Ferrite bead F1. When we increase to high power level portion of the
biasing circuit, its done additionally to low power level portion. Q1 biasing
series circuit: resistor R2, diode D1, and resistor Rb1. The series circuit provides
bias to the Q1’s base. The emitter-collector of transistor Q1 is a bypass around
resistor R1 and at these two components provides variable impedance for giving
the varying bias needed, as between low power inputs and high power inputs.
The purpose of diode D2 is to provide a high impedance constant current
through resistor R1. The circuit of constant current is through diode D2 con-
nected to Vcc through resistor R3, ferrite bead F1, RF inductor L1, and resistor
R1. Diode D2 provides a voltage of about 0.5v at point A under DC static
condition. The voltage at point A is the base voltage Vb of the transistor Q1. The
transistor Q1 having turn ON base voltage of about 0.6v. The DC bias voltage
value 0.5v initially maintains the transistor Q1 in a non-conducting state and the
amplifier is, in effect, operating in a class B mode. Resistor R3 is a power
dissipation limiting resistor and has a typical value of 1.8 kΩ in order to provide
large impedance.
594 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

Biasing circuit of Q2 at high power level: Diode D1, resistor R2, and resistor Rb1
rectify the RF supplied from the input and develops DC bias from transistor Q1
which is proportional to the RF input drive level. At low RF input level, Q1 is
biased OFF and allowing resistor R1 to develop the bias for RF amplifier Q2 which
operating in a class B. When RF input is increased sufficiently, transistor Q1 begin
to saturate, shunting resistor R1 and changing the operating mode of amplifier Q2
from class B to class C. At high drive level conditions, the DC dynamic impedance
between the base-emitter of Q2 is very low and promoting maximum transistor gain
and efficiency. As the drive level is increased or decreased from an intermediate
level (V ± ΔV), the dynamic impedance changes in a nonlinear manner. At low
power input RF transistor Q2 operates at class B and at higher power levels tran-
sistor Q2 operates at class C.
Constant current diode: Constant current diode is an electric device that limits
current to a maximum specified value for device (CLD—Current Limiting Diode,
CRD—Current Regulating Diode). This diode consist of a n-channel JFET tran-
sistor with the gate shorted to the source, which functions like a two terminal
current limiter or current source (analog to voltage limiting Zener diode). It allows a
current through to rise to a certain value, and then level OFF at specific value. This
Exercises 595

diode keeps the current constant. This device keeps the current flowing through it
unchanged when the voltage changes.

VL—Limiting voltage: measured at IL, VL together with knee AC impedance


(Zk), indicates the knee characteristics of the device.
POV = Peak Operating Voltage: maximum voltage to be applied to device.
In operation the CLD regulates the amount of current that can flow over a
voltage range of about 1–100 V. The equivalent circuit of the CLD is a current
generator in series with a parallel combination of the dynamic impedance and the
junction capacitance. The shunt capacitance of Central’s CLD is about 4–10 pF
over the useful operating voltage range.

Ferrite bead circuit model: A ferrite bead is a passive device that suppresses
high frequency noise in electric circuit. It is a specific type of electronic choke.
Ferrite beads prevent interference in two directions, from a device or to a device.
The equivalent ferrite bead is as follow:
596 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

In circuit analysis we need to use for low power level input RF signal—BJT
transistor Small Signal (SS) model (Hybrid Pi) and for high power level input RF
signal—BJT transistor Gummel-Poon model.
6:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations for low power level and
high power level input RF signals. Find fixed points and discuss stability.
6:2 Resistor R1 is disconnected. How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is
changed? Find circuit differential equations and fixed points. Discuss
stability.
6:3 We replace constant current diode (D2) by regular diode. How the
dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed? Find circuit differential
equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
6:4 We replace Ferrite bead F1 by regular RF choke (LF). How the dynamical
behavior of the circuit is changed? Find circuit differential equations and
fixed points. Discuss stability.
6:5 We replace diode D1 by D2 and diode D2 by D1. How the dynamical
behavior of the circuit is changed? Find circuit differential equations and
fixed points. Discuss stability.

7. We have wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with negative feedback net-
work. The feedback network consists of capacitors, resistors, and inductors as
describe in the below circuit. Input and output matching networks are Pi-type.
Input RF signal is Vs(t), Vs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; A0  nðtÞ.
Inductors L2, L3 in the circuit act as the RF choke which blocks the DC current
from entering the RF path. The LNA design also employs output resistive loading
in stabilizing the circuit. The initial output resistor value, R4 is set to less than
100 Ω (R4 < 100 Ω) because high output resistor value may result in huge decrease
of gain and P1 dB point. The BJT transistor (Q1) is self-biased with the biasing
resistors of R2 and R3.
Exercises 597

7:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability.
7:2 Capacitor C2 is disconnected. How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is
changed? Discuss stability and find circuit differential equations and fixed
points.
7:3 We change the input and output matching networks from Pi-type to T-type.
How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed? Discuss stability.
7:4 Resistor R4 is changed by factor Γ ðR4 ! R4  C; C [ 0; C 2 R þ Þ. How
the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of Γ
parameter? Discuss stability for the cases: (a) 0\C
1, (b) C [ 0.
qffiffiffiffiffiffi
7:5 Transistor Q1’s αf and αr parameters are changed by factor Ω1 and X21
3

qffiffiffiffiffiffi
respectively ðaf ! af  X1 ; ar ! ar  X21 ; X1 [ 0; X1 2 R þ Þ. How the
3

dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of Ω1


parameter? Discuss stability for different value of Ω1 parameter.

af : 0:95 ! 0:99; 0:95


af  X1
0:99; ar : 0
qffiffiffiffiffiffi
! 0:95; 0\ar  X21 \0:95; af [ ar
3

8. We have Gummel-Poon model equivalent circuit for BJT. Model’s diode D1 is


disconnected, how it influences our circuit dynamic? Consider single ended
class B amplifier. Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points,
discuss stability. Model’s capacitors Cjx and Ccs are disconnected. Find circuit
differential equations, fixed points and discuss stability. Consider single ended
class B amplifier.
598 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

9. We have two wideband LNAs with negative feedback networks which are
connected in cascade. The first wideband LNA circuit feeds the second wide-
band LNA circuit. The feedback networks include mixture of capacitors,
inductors, and resistors. There are three circuit’s matching networks, input
matching network Pi-type, cascade matching network T-type, and output
matching network Pi-type. Input RF signal is Vs(t), Vs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ
nðtÞ; A0  nðtÞ. Inductors L3, L4 in the first LNA circuit and inductors L7, L8
in the second LNA circuit act as the RF choke which blocks the DC current
from entering the RF part in each LNA circuit. The LNAs design also employs
output resistive loadings (R4.R5 and R9) in stabilizing the circuit. The initial
output resistors values, R4.R5 and R9 are set to less than 100 Ω
ðR4 ; R5 ; R9 \100 XÞ because high output resistor values may result in huge
decrease of gain and P1dB point. The BJT transistors (Q1 and Q2) are
self-biased with the biasing resistors R1, R2 and R8, R7 respectively. Switch S1
connects and disconnects the second LNA negative feedback network.
Exercises 599

9:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability (switch S1 is close).
9:2 How the circuit dynamic is changed if S1 switch is open? Find circuit
differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
9:3 We change the input and output matching networks to T-type. The cascade
matching network is L-type. Switch S1 is in close state. Find circuit dif-
ferential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
9:4 Transistor Q2’s αf and αr parameters are changed by factor Ω1 and
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X31 þ 1 (af ! af  X1 ; ar ! ar  X31 þ 1; X1 [ 0;
5 5
respectively
X1 2 R þ ).
Switch S1 is open. How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for
different values of Ω1 parameter. Discuss stability for different values of Ω1
parameter.

af : 0:95 ! 0:99; 0:95


af  X1
0:99; ar : 0
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
! 0:95; 0\ar  X31 þ 1\0:95; af [ ar
5

9:5 We disconnect capacitor C1. How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is
changed? Discuss stability and find circuit differential equations, fixed
points (switch S1 is close).
10. We have wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with possible four options of
negative feedback networks. The feedback network consists of capacitors,
resistors, inductors, and two SPD2 switches. Input and output matching net-
works are T-type. Input RF signal is Vs(t), Vs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; A0  nðtÞ.
Inductors L1, L2 in the circuit act as the RF choke which blocks the DC current
from entering the RF path. The LNA design also employs output resistive
loading in stabilizing the circuit. The initial output resistor value, R3 is set to
600 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis

less than 100 Ω (R3 < 100 Ω) because high output resistor value may result in
huge decrease of gain and P1 dB point. The BJT transistor (Q1) is self-biased
with the biasing resistors R1 and R2. The possible negative feedback networks
options are as follow: (1) S1(a1) & S2(a2), (2) S1(a1) & S2(b2), (3) S1(b1) &
S2(a2), (4) S1(b1) & S2(b2).

10:1 Write circuit equations and circuit differential equations for each of the
negative feedback network options. Find fixed points and discuss stability
for each network option.
10:2 We short inductor L1, How it influences the circuit dynamics? Find circuit
differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability (all network
options cases).
10:3 We short resistor R3, How it influences circuit dynamics? Find circuit
differential equations, fixed points and discuss stability (all network
options cases).
10:4 Return (10.1), (10.2), and (10.3) when the input and output matching
networks are L-type.
10:5 Return (10.1), (10.2), and (10.3) when we replace Q1 by n-Darlington
transistor (two BJT transistors (Qa, Qb), two resistors Ra, Rb and diode
Da). Consider that Qa and Qb transistors internal parameters are the same
afa ¼ afb ; ara ¼ arb ; etc. . . .
Chapter 6
Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems
Stability Analysis

An electronic oscillator is an electronic circuit that produces a periodic, oscillating


electronic signal, often a sine wave or a square wave. Oscillators are class of circuits
with one terminal or port, which produce a periodic electrical output upon power
up. Oscillators can be classified into two types: (a) Relaxation and (b) Harmonic
oscillators. Relaxation oscillators (also called unstable multi-vibrator) is a class of
circuits with two unstable states. The circuit switches back and forth between these
states. The output is generally square waves. Harmonic oscillators are capable of
producing near sinusoidal output, and are based on positive feedback approach. In
microwave the purpose of a microwave oscillator is to generate a microwave signal.
An oscillator consists of two parts: An active device to generate the power and a
resonator to control the frequency of the microwave signal. The oscillations are
made using feedback or negative resistance. Important issues in oscillators are
frequency stability, frequency tuning, and phase noise. Oscillator is a non-linear
circuit, initially upon power up the condition of oscillation to start up will prevail.
As the magnitudes of voltages and currents in the circuit increase, the amplifier in
the oscillator begins to saturate, reducing the gain, until the loop gain becomes one.
A steady state condition is reached when loop gain is equal to one. We can view an
oscillator as an amplifier that produces an output when there is no input. Thus is an
unstable amplifier that becomes an oscillator. An amplifier can be made unstable by
providing some kind of local positive feedback. Two favorite transistor amplifier
configurations used for oscillator design are the Common-Base (CB) configuration
with base feedback and Common-Emitter (CE) configuration with emitter degen-
eration. Oscillator performance requirements are frequency, frequency stability,
tuning, phase noise, power and efficiency.

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 601


O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_6
602 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift from Its Input


to Output Stability Analysis Under Delayed Variables
in Time

A phase-shift oscillator is a linear electronic oscillator circuit that produces a sine


wave output. It consists of an inverting amplifier element such as a transistor or op
amp with its output fed back to its input through a phase-shift network consisting of
resistors and capacitors in a ladder network. The feedback network ‘shifts’ the
phase of the amplifier output by 180° at the oscillation frequency to give positive
feedback. Phase-shift oscillators are often used at audio frequency as audio oscil-
lators. A phase shift oscillator consists of a single stage of amplifier that amplifies
the input signal and produces a phase shift of 180° the input and its output signal. If
a part of this output is taken and feedback to input, it results in negative feedback
causing the output voltage to decrease. We require positive feedback which means
that the voltage signal feedback should be in phase with the input signal. The output
of the amplifier should take through a phase shift network to provide it an additional
phase shift of 180°. Amplifier provides a phase shift of 180° and the phase shift
network also gives a 180° and therefore, a total phase-shift of 360° (which is
equivalent to 0°) results [25, 26] (Fig. 6.1).
The RC network provides the required phase shift by using three RC. Each having
some value of R and C. These values are selected so as to produce 60° phase shift per
section, resulting in total of 180° phase shift as desired. Practically each RC section does
not provide the same phase shift because each section leads the previous one but the
overall phase shift is 180° which is the requirement. The frequency at which phase shift

Fig. 6.1 Resonator circuit 180° (degree) phase shift


6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift … 603

1 pffiffi
is 180° is f ¼ 2pRC 6
. The circuit generates a sinusoidal wave at its output. The RC
phase shift network is used to form a positive feedback loop. Rb and Rc resistors
polarize the transistor Q1 for DC current, Rs is a separating resistor. R1 ¼ R2 ¼ R;
C1 ¼ C2 ¼ C3 ¼ C. Phase shift resonant circuit stability analysis is done by con-
sidering BJT Small Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. We consider “AC ground” in
the circuit. Since the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there is no time
variation of the voltage consequently. We can set this terminal to be an “AC ground”
in the small signal circuit. For AC ground, we “kill” the DC sources at that terminal
(short circuit voltage sources and open circuit current sources) [33, 34] (Fig. 6.2).

Vcc  VA4 Vcc  VA1 VA  VA5 VA5


IRc ¼ ; IR b ¼ ; IR s ¼ 4 ; IRload ¼ ; Ir pi
Rc Rb Rs Rload
VA d
¼ 1 ; IC3 ¼ C3  ðVA4  VA3 Þ
r pi dt

VA3 d VA
IR 2 ¼ ; IC3 ¼ IC2 þ IR2 ; IC2 ¼ C2  ðVA3  VA2 Þ; IR1 ¼ 2 ; IC2 ¼ IC1 þ IR1
R3 dt R1
d
IC1 ¼ C1  ðVA2  VA1 Þ; IRb þ IC1 ¼ Ir pi ; IRc ¼ IC3 þ IRs þ gm  vBE ; vBE ¼ VA1
dt
IRc ¼ IC3 þ IRs þ gm  VA1 ¼ IC3 þ IRs þ gm  ½Vcc  IRb  Rb 

Fig. 6.2 Phase shift resonator equivalent circuit (BJT small signal)
604 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

Vcc  VA4
IRc ¼ ) IRc  Rc ¼ Vcc  VA4 ) VA4 ¼ Vcc  IRc  Rc
Rc
Vcc  VA1
IRb ¼ ) IRb  Rb ¼ Vcc  VA1 ) VA1 ¼ Vcc  IRb  Rb
Rb
VA5
IRload ¼ ; IRload ¼ IRs ; VA5 ¼ IRload  Rload ¼ IRs  Rload
Rload
VA  VA5
IR s ¼ 4 ) IRs  Rs ¼ VA4  VA5 ¼ Vcc  IRc  Rc  IRs  Rload
Rs
V A1
IRs  ðRs þ Rload Þ ¼ Vcc  IRc  Rc ; Ir pi ¼ ) V A1 ¼ I r pi  r pi; Ir pi  r pi ¼ Vcc  IRb  Rb
r pi
VA3 VA d
I R2 ¼ ) VA3 ¼ IR2  R3 ; IR1 ¼ 2 ) VA2 ¼ IR1  R1 ; IC3 ¼ C3  ðVcc  IRc  Rc  IR2  R3 Þ
R3 R1 dt

dVcc dIRc dIR dVcc


IC3 ¼ C3  ð   Rc  2  R3 Þ; ! e;
dt dt dt dt
dIR dIR2
IC3 ¼ C3  ð c  Rc þ  R3 Þ
dt dt
d d
IC2 ¼ C2  ðVA3  VA2 Þ ¼ C2  ðIR2  R3  IR1  R1 Þ;
dt dt
dIR2 dIR1
I C2 ¼ C2  ð  R3   R1 Þ
dt dt
d d
I C1 ¼ C 1  ðVA2  VA1 Þ ¼ C1  ðIR1  R1  Vcc þ IRb  Rb Þ;
dt dt
dIR1 dVcc dIRb
I C1 ¼ C 1  ð  R1  þ  Rb Þ
dt dt dt
dVcc dIR dIRb
! e; IC1 ¼ C1  ð 1  R1 þ  Rb Þ
dt dt dt

We can write KCL for the above circuit (Table 6.1):

Table 6.1 Phase shift KCL @ node Expression


resonator equivalent circuit
(BJT small signal) KCL@ A1 IRb þ IC1 ¼ Ir pi
nodes and expressions A2 IC2 ¼ IC1 þ IR1
A3 IC3 ¼ IC2 þ IR2
A4 IRc ¼ IC3 þ IRs þ gm  vBE
A5 IRload ¼ IRs
6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift … 605

IR b þ IC 1 ¼ Ir pi ) I C1 ¼ I r pi  IRb ; IC2 ¼ IC1 þ IR1 ) IC2 ¼ Ir pi  IRb þ IR1

X
2
IC3 ¼ IC2 þ IR2 ¼ Ir pi  IRb þ IR1 þ IR2 ¼ Ir pi  IRb þ IRk ;
k¼1
X
2
I C3 ¼ I r pi  IRb þ IR k
k¼1

We can summery our system three differential equations:

dIR1 dIRb
Ir pi  IRb ¼ C1  ð  R1 þ  Rb Þ; Ir pi  IR b þ IR 1
dt dt
dIR2 dIR1
¼ C2  ð  R3   R1 Þ
dt dt
X
2
dIRc dIR2
Ir pi  IRb þ IRk ¼ C3  ð  Rc þ  R3 Þ
k¼1
dt dt

Vcc Rc
IRs  ðRs þ Rload Þ ¼ Vcc  IRc  Rc ) IRs ¼  IR c 
ðRs þ Rload Þ ðRs þ Rload Þ

X
2
Vcc Rc
IRc ¼ Ir pi  IR b þ IRk þ  IR c  þ gm  ½Vcc  IRb  Rb 
k¼1
ðRs þ Rload Þ ðRs þ Rload Þ

Rc X
2
Vcc
IRc  ð1 þ Þ ¼ Ir pi  IR b þ IRk þ þ gm
ðRs þ Rload Þ k¼1
ðRs þ Rload Þ
 ½Vcc  IRb  Rb 

Vcc Rb
Ir pi  r pi ¼ Vcc  IRb  Rb ) Ir pi ¼  IRb 
r pi r pi

Rc Vcc Rb X2
Vcc
IRc  ð1 þ Þ¼  IRb   IR b þ IRk þ
ðRs þ Rload Þ r pi r pi k¼1
ðRs þ Rload Þ
þ gm  ½Vcc  IRb  Rb 

Rc 1 1 Rb
IRc  ð1 þ Þ ¼ Vcc  ½ þ þ gm   IRb  ½ þ1
ðRs þ Rload Þ r pi ðRs þ Rload Þ r pi
X
2
þ gm  Rb  þ IRk
k¼1
606 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

½r 1pi þ ðRs þ Rload Þ þ gm 


1
½r Rbpi þ 1 þ gm  Rb  1
IRc ¼ Vcc   IR b  þ
ð1 þ ðRs þRRc load ÞÞ ð1 þ ðRs þ Rload ÞÞ
Rc
ð1 þ ðRs þ Rload ÞÞ
Rc

X
2
 IRk
k¼1

We define for simplicity the following global parameters:

½r 1pi þ ðRs þ Rload Þ þ gm 


1
C1 ðr pi; Rs ; Rload ; . . .Þ ¼ ; C1 ¼ C1 ðr pi; Rs ; Rload ; . . .Þ
ð1 þ ðRs þRRc load ÞÞ

½r Rbpi þ 1 þ gm  Rb 
C2 ðRb ; r pi; Rb ; . . .Þ ¼ ; C2 ¼ C2 ðRb ; r pi; Rb ; . . .Þ
ð1 þ ðRs þ Rload ÞÞ
Rc

1
C3 ðRc ; Rs ; . . .Þ ¼ ; C3 ¼ C3 ðRc ; Rs ; . . .Þ
ð1 þ ðRs þ Rload ÞÞ
Rc

IRc ¼ Vcc  C1 ðr pi; Rs ; Rload ; . . .Þ  IRb  C2 ðRb ; r pi; Rb ; . . .Þ þ C3 ðRc ; Rs ; . . .Þ


X
2
 IR k
k¼1

dIRc dVcc dIR


¼  C1 ðr pi; Rs ; Rload ; . . .Þ  b  C2 ðRb ; r pi; Rb ; . . .Þ þ C3 ðRc ; Rs ; . . .Þ
dt dt dt
X2
dIRk

k¼1
dt

dVcc dVcc dIRc dIR X2


dIRk
!e)  C1 ðr pi; Rs ; Rload ; . . .Þ ! e; ¼  b  C2 þ C3 
dt dt dt dt k¼1
dt

We can summery our system three differential equations with variables:


R1 ; R2 ; Rb .

Vcc Rb dIR dIRb


ðÞ  IRb   IRb ¼ C1  ð 1  R1 þ  Rb Þ
r pi r pi dt dt

Vcc Rb dIR dIR


ðÞ  IR b  ½ þ 1 þ IR1 ¼ C2  ð 2  R3  1  R1 Þ
r pi r pi dt dt
6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift … 607

Vcc Rb X2
dIR
ð  Þ  IRb   IRb þ IRk ¼ C3  ð b  C2  Rc þ C3  Rc
r pi r pi k¼1
dt
X dIR
2
dIR2
 k
þ  R3 Þ
k¼1
dt dt

Another representation of system three differential equations:

Vcc Rb dIR dIRb


ðÞ  IRb   IRb ¼ C1  ð 1  R1 þ  Rb Þ
r pi r pi dt dt

Vcc Rb dIR dIR1


 IR b  ½ þ 1  b  C1  Rb ¼  C1  R1
r pi r pi dt dt

Vcc Rb dIR dIR


ðÞ  IR b  ½ þ 1 þ IR1 ¼ C2  ð 2  R3  1  R1 Þ
r pi r pi dt dt

Vcc Rb dIR dIR


 IRb  ½ þ 1 þ IR1 ¼ C2  ð 2  R3  1  R1 Þ
r pi r pi dt dt

Vcc Rb X2
dIR
ð  Þ  IRb   IRb þ IRk ¼ C3  ð b  C2  Rc þ C3  Rc
r pi r pi k¼1
dt
X2
dIRk dIR2
 þ  R3 Þ
k¼1
dt dt

Vcc Rb X2
dIRb dIR dIR
 IR b  ½ þ 1 þ IRk ¼  C2  C3  Rc  C3  Rc  C3  1  2
r pi r pi k¼1
dt dt dt
 C3  ½C3  Rc þ R3 

And we get the following differential equations:

dIR1 Vcc ½r Rbpi þ 1 dIRb Rb


ðÞ ¼  IRb   
dt r pi  C1  R1 C1  R1 dt R1

ðÞ ! ðÞ
Vcc Rb
 IRb  ½ þ 1 þ IR1
r pi r pi
dIR2 Vcc ½r Rbpi þ 1 dIRb Rb
¼ C2  ð  R3  ½  IR b      R1 Þ
dt r pi  C1  R1 C1  R1 dt R1
608 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

Vcc Rb dIR2 Vcc  C2


 IRb  ½ þ 1 þ IR1 ¼  C2  R3  þ IRb
r pi r pi dt r pi  C1
½r pi þ 1  C2 dIRb
Rb
 þ  Rb  C2
C1 dt

Vcc dIR2 Vcc  C2 Rb C2 dIRb


þ IR1 ¼  C2  R3  þ IRb  ½ þ 1  ½ þ 1 þ  Rb  C2
r pi dt r pi  C1 r pi C1 dt

ðÞ ! ð  Þ
Vcc Rb X2
dIRb
 IR b  ½ þ 1 þ IR k ¼  C2  C3  Rc
r pi r pi k¼1
dt
Vcc ½r Rbpi þ 1 dIRb Rb dIR
 C3  Rc  C3  ½  IR b      2  C3  ½C3  Rc þ R3 
r pi  C1  R1 C 1  R1 dt R1 dt

Vcc Rb X2
dIRb C3  Rb
 IRb  ½ þ 1 þ IRk ¼  Rc  C3  ½C2 þ 
r pi r pi k¼1
dt R1
C3  Rc  C3  Vcc C3  Rc  C3  ½r Rbpi þ 1 dIR2
 þ IRb    C3  ½C3  Rc þ R3 
r pi  C1  R1 C1  R1 dt

We define new global parameters for simplicity:

C2 Rb C2 Rb
X1 ¼ ; X2 ¼ ½ þ 1  ½ þ 1; X3 ¼ ½ þ 1;
r pi  C1 r pi C1 r pi
C3  Rb
X4 ¼ Rc  C3  ½C2 þ 
R1

C3  Rc  C3 C3  Rc  C3  ½r Rb
pi þ 1
X5 ¼ ; X6 ¼ ; X7 ¼ C3  ½C3  Rc þ R3 
r pi  C1  R1 C1  R1

Vcc dIR2 dIRb


þ IR1 ¼  C2  R3  Vcc  X1 þ IRb  X2 þ  Rb  C2
r pi dt dt

Vcc X2
dIRb dIR
 IR b  X 3 þ IR k ¼  X4  Vcc  X5 þ IRb  X6  2  X7
r pi k¼1
dt dt

Vcc dIR2 dIRb


þ IR1 ¼  C2  R3  Vcc  X1 þ IRb  X2 þ  Rb  C2
r pi dt dt

dIRb ½r 1pi þ X1  1 R3 dIR X2


¼ Vcc  þ  IR1   2  IRb 
dt Rb  C2 Rb  C2 Rb dt Rb  C2
6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift … 609

Vcc X2
dIRb dIR
 IR b  X 3 þ IR k ¼  X4  Vcc  X5 þ IRb  X6  2  X7
r pi k¼1
dt dt

Vcc X2 ½r 1pi þ X1  1 R3 dIR X2


 IR b  X 3 þ IRk ¼ ½Vcc  þ  IR 1   2  IR b    X4
r pi k¼1
R b  C 2 R b  C 2 Rb dt R b  C2
dIR2
 Vcc  X5 þ IRb  X6   X7
dt

R3  X4 dIR 1 ½r 1
pi þ X1   X4 X2  X4
½ þ X7   2 ¼ Vcc  ð  þ X 5 Þ þ IR b  ½  X6  X3 
Rb dt r pi Rb  C 2 Rb  C 2
X4
þ ½1    I R 1 þ IR 2
Rb  C 2

½r 1
pi þ X1 X4
dIR2 ð Rb C2  r 1pi  X5 Þ ½X6 þ X3  XRb2C
X4

¼ Vcc  þ IRb  2

dt ½R3RXb 4 þ X7  ½R3RXb 4 þ X7 
½RbXC4 2  1 1
þ  IR1   IR2
½R3RXb 4 þ X7  ½R3RXb 4 þ X7 

We define for simplicity the following global parameters:

½ 1
pi þ X1 X4
ðr Rb C2  r 1pi  X5 Þ
N1 ¼ N1 ðr pi; R3 ; Rb ; X1 ; X4 ; . . .Þ ¼
½R3RXb 4 þ X7 

½X6 þ X3  XRb2C
X4

N2 ¼ N2 ðRb ; R3 ; X2 ; X3 ; X4 ; . . .Þ ¼ 2
; N3 ¼ N3 ðRb ; R3 ; X4 ; . . .Þ
½R3RXb 4 þ X7 
½RbXC4 2  1
¼
½R3RXb 4 þ X7 

1
N4 ¼ N4 ðR3 ; Rb ; X4 ; . . .Þ ¼ 
½R3RXb 4 þ X7 

dIR2
¼ Vcc  N1 þ IRb  N2 þ N3  IR1 þ N4  IR2
dt

dIRb ½r pi þ X1 
1
1 R3
¼ Vcc  þ  IR1   ½Vcc  N1 þ IRb  N2 þ N3  IR1
dt Rb  C2 Rb  C2 Rb
X2
þ N4  IR2   IRb 
Rb  C2
610 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

1 ½r pi þ X1 
1
dIRb 1 1 R3
¼ Vcc   ½  R3  N1  þ ½  N3  R3    IR1  N4   IR2
dt Rb C2 C2 Rb Rb
1 X2
 IRb   ½R3  N2 þ 
Rb C2

We define for simplicity the following global parameters:

1 ½r pi þ X1 
1
N5 ¼ N5 ðr pi; Rb ; R3 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½  R3  N1 
Rb C2

1 1 R3
N6 ¼ N6 ðN3 ; R3 ; Rb ; . . .Þ ¼ ½  N3  R3   ; N7 ¼ N7 ðN4 ; R3 ; . . .Þ ¼ N4 
C2 Rb Rb

1 X2
N8 ¼ N8 ðR3 ; N2 ; . . .Þ ¼   ½R3  N2 þ ;
Rb C2
dIRb
¼ Vcc  N5 þ N6  IR1 þ N7  IR2 þ IRb  N8
dt

dIR1 Vcc ½r Rbpi þ 1 dIRb Rb


¼  IRb   
dt r pi  C1  R1 C1  R1 dt R1

dIR1 Vcc ½r Rbpi þ 1 Rb


¼  IR b   ½Vcc  N5 þ N6  IR1 þ N7  IR2 þ IRb  N8  
dt r pi  C1  R1 C 1  R1 R1

dIR1 1 Rb Rb Rb 1
¼ Vcc  ½  N5    N6   IR1  N7   IR2  IRb  
dt r pi  C1  R1 R1 R1 R1 R1
½r Rbpi þ 1
½N8  Rb þ 
C1

1 Rb
N9 ¼ N9 ðR1 ; Rb ; r pi; . . .Þ ¼  N5  ; N10 ¼ N10 ðRb ; R1 ; . . .Þ
r pi  C1  R1 R1
Rb
¼ N6 
R1
Rb
N11 ¼ N11 ðN7 ; Rb ; . . .Þ ¼ N7  ; N12 ¼ N12 ðN8 ; R1 ; Rb ; . . .Þ
R1
1 ½r Rbpi þ 1
¼  ½N8  Rb þ 
R1 C1

dIR1
¼ Vcc  N9 þ N10  IR1 þ N11  IR2 þ IRb  N12
dt
6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift … 611

We can summery our system set of differential equations:

dIR1 dIR
¼ Vcc  N9 þ N10  IR1 þ N11  IR2 þ IRb  N12 ; 2
dt dt
¼ Vcc  N1 þ IRb  N2 þ N3  IR1 þ N4  IR2

dIRb
¼ Vcc  N5 þ N6  IR1 þ N7  IR2 þ IRb  N8
dt

Phase shift resonator circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small
Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. We consider “AC ground” in the circuit. Since
the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there is no time variation of the
voltage. Consequently, we can set this terminal to be an “AC ground” in the small
signal circuit (Vcc = 0). Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions, the BJT is
replaced with linear Hybrid Pi model [26, 27].

dIR1 dIR
¼ N10  IR1 þ N11  IR2 þ IRb  N12 ; 2 ¼ IRb  N2 þ N3  IR1 þ N4  IR2
dt dt
dIRb
¼ N6  IR1 þ N7  IR2 þ IRb  N8
dt
dIR1 dIR2 dIRb
At fixed points: dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0

N10  IR1 þ N11  IR2 þ IRb  N12 ¼ 0; N3  IR1 þ N4  IR2 þ IRb  N2 ¼ 0;


N6  IR1 þ N7  IR2 þ IRb  N8 ¼ 0

EðIR1 ; IR2 ; IRb Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0Þ. If Vcc 6¼ 0 then we get the following three equations
for system fixed points (equilibrium points):

N10  IR1 þ N11  IR2 þ IRb  N12 ¼ Vcc  N9 ; N3  IR1 þ N4  IR2 þ IRb  N2 ¼ Vcc  N1
N6  IR1 þ N7  IR2 þ IRb  N8 ¼ Vcc  N5

To use determinants to solve our system fixed points equations ðVcc 6¼ 0Þ with
three fixed points (Cramer’s Rule), IR1 ; IR2 ; IRb , four determinants must be formed
following the procedure:
(I) Write all fixed points equations in standard form.
(II) Create the denominator determinant, D, by using the coefficients of
IR1 ; IR2 ; IRb from the equations and evaluate it.
(III) Create the IR1 —numerator determinant, DIR , the IR2 —numerator determinant,
1
DIR , and the IRb —numerator determinant, DIR , by replacing the respective
2 b
IR1 ; IR2 , and IRb coefficients with the constants from the equations in standard
form and evaluate each determinant.
612 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

DI  DI  DI 
The answers for IR1 ; IR2 , and IRb are as follow: IR1 ¼ DR1 ; IR2 ¼ DR2 ; IRb ¼ D
Rb
.
We solve this system of fixed point’s equations, using Cramer’s Rule.
0 1
N10 N11 N12      
B C N4 N2 N3 N2 N3 N4
D ¼ det@ N3 N4 N2 A ¼ N10  det  N11  det þ N12  det
N7 N8 N6 N8 N6 N7
N6 N7 N8
D ¼ N10  ðN4  N8  N7  N2 Þ  N11  ðN3  N8  N6  N2 Þ þ N12  ðN3  N7  N6  N4 Þ
D ¼ N10  N4  N8  N10  N7  N2  N11  N3  N8 þ N11  N6  N2 þ N12  N3  N7  N12  N6  N4

We use the constants to replace the IR1 —coefficients.


0 1
Vcc  N9 N11 N12  
B C N4 N2
D IR ¼ det@ Vcc  N1 N4 N2 A ¼ Vcc  N9  det
1 N7 N8
Vcc  N5 N7 N8
   
N11 N12 N11 N12
þ Vcc  N1  det  Vcc  N5  det
N7 N8 N4 N2

DIR ¼ Vcc  N9  ðN4  N8  N7  N2 Þ þ Vcc  N1  ðN11  N8  N7  N12 Þ  Vcc  N5  ðN11  N2  N4  N12 Þ


1

DIR ¼ Vcc  N9  N4  N8 þ Vcc  N9  N7  N2 þ Vcc  N1  N11  N8  Vcc  N1  N7  N12


1

 Vcc  N5  N11  N2 þ Vcc  N5  N4  N12

We use the constants to replace the IR2 —coefficients.


0 1
N10 Vcc  N9 N12  
B C Vcc  N1 N2
DIR ¼ det@ N3 Vcc  N1 N2 A ¼ N10  det
2 Vcc  N5 N8
N6 Vcc  N5 N8
   
N3 N2 N3 Vcc  N1
þ Vcc  N9   N12 
N6 N8 N6 Vcc  N5

DIR ¼ N10  ðVcc  N1  N8 þ Vcc  N5  N2 Þ þ Vcc  N9  ðN3  N8  N6  N2 Þ


2

 N12  ðVcc  N5  N3 þ Vcc  N1  N6 Þ

DIR ¼ Vcc  N1  N10  N8 þ Vcc  N5  N10  N2 þ Vcc  N9  N3  N8  Vcc  N9  N6  N2


2

þ Vcc  N5  N12  N3  Vcc  N1  N12  N6

We use the constants to replace the IRb —coefficients.


6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift … 613

0 1
N10 N11 Vcc  N9  
B C N4 Vcc  N1
DIR ¼ det@ N3 N4 Vcc  N1 A ¼ N10  det
b N7 Vcc  N5
N6 N7 Vcc  N5
   
N3 Vcc  N1 N3 N4
 N11   Vcc  N9 
N6 Vcc  N5 N6 N7

DIR ¼ N10  ðVcc  N5  N4 þ Vcc  N1  N7 Þ  N11  ðVcc  N5  N3 þ Vcc  N1  N6 Þ


b

 Vcc  N9  ðN3  N7  N6  N4 Þ

DIR ¼ Vcc  N5  N10  N4 þ Vcc  N1  N10  N7 þ Vcc  N5  N11  N3  Vcc  N1  N11  N6


b

 Vcc  N9  N3  N7 þ Vcc  N9  N6  N4

DI  DI  DI 
Therefore, IR1 ¼ DR1 ; IR2 ¼ DR2 ; IRb ¼ DRb . If the denominator determinant, D,
has a value of zero, then system is either inconsistent or dependent. The system is
dependent if all the determinants have a value of zero. The system is inconsistent if
at least one of the determinants, DIR ; DIR or DIR has a value not equal to zero and
1 2 b
the denominator determinant has a value of zero.
Stability discussion:
0 dIR 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
N10 N11 N12 b1 ðIR1 ; tÞ IR1 ðt ¼ 0Þ
1
dt IR 1
B dIR2 C @
@ dt A ¼ N3 N4 N2 A  @ IR2 A þ @ b2 ðIR2 ; tÞ A; @ IR2 ðt ¼ 0Þ A ¼ a0
dIRb N6 N7 N8 IR b b3 ðIRb ; tÞ IRb ðt ¼ 0Þ
dt

1 0
IR 1
We define the following notation: X ¼ @ IR2 A; X ¼ ðIR1 ; IR2 ; IRb Þ?
IR b
0 1
N10 N11 N12
A ¼ @ N3 N4 N2 A; b ¼ ðarray20cb1 b2 b3 Þ; b ¼ ðb1 ; b2 ; b3 Þ?
N6 N7 N8

A is a real, time independent (3 × 3)-matrix and the components of


b ¼ ðb1 ; b2 ; b3 Þ? 0 1
IR1
Are real C1—functions for all X ¼ @ IR2 A in a neighborhood of the origin for
IRb
0 1 0 1
b1 ðIR1 ¼ 0; tÞ IR1
all times t ≥ 0. Moreover, let @ b2 ðIR2 ¼ 0; tÞ A ¼ 0 . Hence X ¼ @ IR2 A  0 is a
b3 ðIRb ¼ 0; tÞ IRb
614 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

solution of our system linear differential equation which corresponds to a point of


equilibrium of the system. The equilibrium point is at X = 0.
Stability: The equilibrium point EðIR1 ; IR2 ; IRb Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0Þ is stable if and only if
for each ε > 0 there is a number δ > 0 such that from jtj\d, the existence of a
unique solution X ¼ XðtÞ ) ðIR1 IR2 IRb Þ ¼ ðIR1 ðtÞIR2 ðtÞIRb ðtÞÞ of our system linear
differential equation follows, with jXðtÞj\e for all times t ≥ 0. This means that
sufficiently small perturbations of the equilibrium configuration at X ¼
ðIR1 IR2 IRb Þ ¼ 0 remain small for all t ≥ 0.
Asymptotic stability: The equilibrium point EðIR1 ; IR2 ; IRb Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0Þ is
asymptotically stable if and only if it is stable and in addition there is a number
d [ 0 such that, for each solution with jXð0Þj\d , we have the limit rela-
tion lim XðtÞ ¼ 0. Sufficient small perturbations of the equilibrium configuration at
t!1
time t = 0 return to their starting configuration after a sufficiently long term.
Instability: The equilibrium point EðIR1 ; IR2 ; IRb Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0Þ is instable if and
only if it is not stable.
We can implement in our system the theorem on stability by Liapunov:
dIR1 dIR2 dIRb
Suppose a perturbation b of the linear system ð dt dt dt Þ ¼
0 1
N10 N11 N12
@ N3 N4 N2 A  ðIR1 IR2 IRb Þ
N6 N7 N8
With constant coefficients is sufficiently small, i.e., one has
lim ðsup jbðX;tÞj
jXj Þ ¼ 0
jXj!1 t  0
The equilibrium point EðIR1 ; IR2 ; IRb Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0Þ is asymptotically stable, if all
eigenvalues λ1, λ2, … of the matrix A are in the left half plane, have negative real
part for all j. The equilibrium point EðIR1 ; IR2 ; IRb Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0Þ is unstable, if an
eigenvalue of A is in the right half plane, i.e., one has Re kj [ 0 for some j. If an
eigenvalue of A is on the imaginary axis, then the method of the center manifold
must be applied. To apply the stability criterion of Liapunov to our system, the
equation detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 has a zero in the left half plane, without calculating the
eigenvalues explicitly.
Eigenvalues stability discussion: Our phase shift oscillation system involving N
variables (N > 2, N = 3), the characteristic equation is of degree N = 3 and must
often be solved numerically. Expect in some particular cases, such an equation has
(N = 3) distinct roots that can be real or complex. These values are the eigenvalues
of the 3 × 3 Jacobian matrix (A). The general rule is that the Steady State (SS) is
stable if there is no eigenvalue with positive real part. It is sufficient that one
eigenvalue is positive for the steady state to be unstable. Our 3-variables
ðIR1 ; IR2 ; IRb Þ system has three eigenvalues. The type of behavior can be
6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift … 615

characterized as a function of the position of these eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane.


Five non-degenerated cases can be distinguished: (1) the three eigenvalues are real
and negative (stable steady state), (2) the three eigenvalues are real, two of them are
negative (unstable steady state), (3) and (4) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates
with a negative real part and the third one real is negative (stable steady state), two
cases can be distinguished depending on the relative value of the real part of the
complex eigenvalues and of the real one, (5) two eigenvalues are complex conju-
gates with a negative real part and the third one real is positive (unstable steady
state) [2, 3, 4].
0 1
N10 N11 N12
A ¼ @ N3 N4 N2 A; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0
N0
6 N7 N8 1
N10  k N11 N12
) det@ N3 N4  k N2 A ¼ 0
N6 N7 N8  k
0 1
N10  k N11 N12  
B C N4  k N2
det@ N3 N4  k N2 A ¼ ðN10  kÞ  det
N7 N8  k
N6 N7 N8  k
 
N3 N2
 N11  det
N6 N8  k
 
N3 N4  k
þ N12  det
N6 N7

detðA  k  IÞ ¼ ðN10  kÞ  ½ðN4  kÞ  ðN8  kÞ  N7  N2   N11  ½N3  ðN8  kÞ  N6  N2 


þ N12  ½N3  N7  N6  ðN4  kÞ

detðA  k  IÞ ¼ ðN10  kÞ  ½ðN4  N8  N7  N2 Þ  ðN4 þ N8 Þ  k þ k2 


 N11  ½ðN3  N8  N6  N2 Þ  N3  k þ N12  ½ðN3  N7  N6  N4 Þ þ N6  k

detðA  k  IÞ ¼ N10  ðN4  N8  N7  N2 Þ  N10  ðN4 þ N8 Þ  k þ N10  k2


 k  ðN4  N8  N7  N2 Þ þ ðN4 þ N8 Þ  k2  k3  N11  ðN3  N8  N6  N2 Þ
þ N11  N3  k þ N12  ðN3  N7  N6  N4 Þ þ N6  N12  k

detðA  k  IÞ ¼ k3 þ ½N10 þ N4 þ N8   k2


þ ½N11  N3 þ N6  N12  ðN4  N8  N7  N2 Þ  N10  ðN4 þ N8 Þ  k
þ N10  ðN4  N8  N7  N2 Þ  N11  ðN3  N8  N6  N2 Þ þ N12  ðN3  N7  N6  N4 Þ
616 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

We define new parameters: !3 ¼ 1; !2 ¼ N10 þ N4 þ N8

!1 ¼ N11  N3 þ N6  N12  ðN4  N8  N7  N2 Þ  N10  ðN4 þ N8 Þ


!0 ¼ N10  ðN4  N8  N7  N2 Þ  N11  ðN3  N8  N6  N2 Þ þ N12  ðN3  N7  N6  N4 Þ

X
3 X
3
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ !k  kk ; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) ! k  kk ¼ 0
k¼0 k¼0

P
We get zeros of the polynomial 3k¼0 !k  kk ¼ 0 with real coefficients !k .
P
The characteristic equation is a polynomial of degree N = 3: 3k¼0 !k  kk ¼ 0:
We suppose k1 ; k2 ; k3 all (known) eigenvalues of the linearized system:
dXðtÞ
dt ¼ A  XðtÞ; XðtÞ ¼ ðIR1 ðtÞIR2 ðtÞIRb ðtÞÞ. If one eigenvalue kk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3 has
a real part greater than zero kk [ 0; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; the perturbation will ultimately
increase and the steady state is thus unstable. To determine if all the eigenvalue
have a negative real part can be done by checking some conditions, known as the
Routh-Hurwitz criteria. In our case we define N = 3 matrices as follow:
Coefficients !k are real and fulfilling !k¼3 lie in the left half plane, if and only if,
all determinants: H1, H2, and H3 (with !m ¼ 0 for m [ 3; then !4 ¼ 0; !5 ¼ 0Þ are
positive. It is the condition for stability.
0 1
  !1 !0 0
!1 !0
H1 ¼ ð!1 Þ; H2 ¼ ; H3 ¼ @ !3 !2 !1 A
!3 !2
!5 ¼ 0 !4 ¼ 0 !3

Stability criteria:
 
!1 !0
detðH1 Þ ¼ detð!1 Þ [ 0 ) !1 [ 0 ; det(H2 Þ ¼ det [0
!3 !2
) !1  !2  !3  !0 [ 0 ) !1  !2 [ !3  !0
0 1
!1 !0 0
B C
detðH3 Þ ¼ det@ !3 !2 !1 A [ 0 ) !1  !2  !3  !0  !23
!5 ¼ 0 !4 ¼ 0 !3
Y
3
¼ !k  !0  !23 [ 0
k¼1
Y
3
!k  !0  !23 ¼ !3  ð!1  !2  !0  !3 Þ [ 0
k¼1

We have two cases for detðH3 Þ [ 0: Case (I) !3 [ 0 & !1  !2 [ !0  !3


Case (II) !3 \0 and !1  !2 \!0  !3 .
6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift … 617

We are interesting to get oscillations from the phase shift resonator circuit. To get
oscillations, we need eigenvalue of A is on imaginary axis, and then the method of
the center manifold is applied. The center manifold of an equilibrium point (fixed
point) of our dynamical system consists of orbits whose behavior around the
equilibrium point is not controlled by either the attraction of the stable manifold or
the repulsion of the unstable manifold. Phase shift resonator eigenvalues corre-
sponding to eigenvalues with negative real part form the stable Eigen space, which
gives rise to the stable manifold. Eigenvalue with positive real part yield the
unstable manifold. If there are eigenvalues whose real part is zero, then these give
rise to the center manifold. If the eigenvalues are precisely zero, then these more
specifically give rise to a slow manifold [3, 4].
The system matrix A defines three main subspaces:
(I) Stable subspace, which is spanned by our system generalized eigenvectors
corresponding to the eigenvalues λ with Re λ < 0.
(II) Unstable subspace, which is spanned by our system generalized eigenvectors
corresponding to the eigenvalues λ with Re λ > 0.
(III) Center subspace, which is spanned by our generalized eigenvectors corre-
sponding to the eigenvalues λ with Re λ = 0.
The options for sub spaces of interest include center-stable, center-unstable,
sub-center, slow, and fast subspaces. These subspaces are all invariant subspaces of
the system’s linear equations.
Center manifold theorem: The neighborhood may be chosen so that all solutions
of the system staying in the neighborhood tend exponentially to some solution on
the center manifold. A wide variety of initial conditions yields to solutions of the
full system which decay exponentially quickly to a solution on the relatively low
dimensional center manifold.

6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis


Under Parameters Variations

A good oscillator is stable in that its frequency and amplitude of oscillation do not
vary appreciably with temperature, process, power supply and external distur-
bances. The amplitude of oscillation is particularly stable, always returning to the
same value. LC tank oscillator is not a good oscillator. Due to loss, no matter how
small, the amplitude of the oscillator decays. Many oscillators can be viewed as
feedback systems. The oscillation is sustained by feeding back a fraction of the
output signal, using an amplifier to gain the signal, and then injecting the energy
back into the tank. The transistor “pushes” the LC tank with just about enough
energy to compensate for the loss. Typical oscillator feedback system is describes in
the below figure (Fig. 6.3).
618 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

Fig. 6.3 Typical closed loop oscillator feedback system

Fig. 6.4 LC tank circuit and


active device as a negative
resistance generator

Another option is to view the active device as a negative resistance generator. In


steady state, the losses in the tank due to conductance G are balanced by the power
drawn from the active device through the negative conductance—G (Fig. 6.4).
In a real oscillator, the amplitude of oscillation initially grows exponentially as
linear system theory predicts. The oscillator amplitude is initially very small. But as
the oscillations become more vigorous, the non-linearity of the system comes into
play. We will analyze by using nonlinear dynamic the steady-state behavior, where
the system is non-linear but periodically time-varying. Typical circuit is BJT NPN
transistor LC oscillator. The base of the NPN transistor (Q1) is conveniently biased
through the transformer windings. The transistor Q1’s emitter resistor is bypassed
by a large capacitor at AC frequencies. The LC oscillator uses a transformer for
feedback. Since the amplifier has a phase shift of 180°, the feedback transformer
needs to provide an additional phase shift of 180° to provide positive feedback
[33, 34]. (Fig. 6.5).
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis … 619

Fig. 6.5 Closed loop functioning oscillator with transformer T1

We use for our stability analysis the BJT NPN transistor Small Signal
(SS) model equivalent circuit (Hybrid Pi model Version A). We consider “AC
ground” in the circuit. Since the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there
is no time variation of the voltage. Consequently, we can set this terminal to be an
“AC ground” in the small signal circuit. For AC ground, we “kill” the DC sources
at that terminal (short circuit voltage sources and open circuit current sources).
Transformer T1: vp—transformer primary voltage, vs—transformer secondary
voltage. ϕ is the flux through a one turn coil located anywhere on the transformer
core. np and ns are the number of turns of the coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary),
respectively, then the total flux ϕp and ϕs through coils 1 and 2 respectively
d/p d/s
are /p ¼ np  /; /s ¼ ns  /; vp ¼ dt ; vs ¼ dt ; vp ¼ np  dt ; vs ¼ ns  dt ; vp ðtÞ ¼
d/ d/

v ðtÞ n n v ðtÞ n
vp ; vs ðtÞ ¼ vs ; vps ðtÞ ¼ nps ; a ¼ nps . vps ðtÞ ¼ nps for all times t and for all voltages vp and vs
n
. We define the ratio between np and ns as “a” ða ¼ nps Þ. Step down transformer
a > 1 and step up transformer a < 1. By law of conservation of energy, apparent
real and reactive powers are each conserved in the input and output
qffiffiffiffi
v n L
ðS ¼ Ip  vp ¼ Is  vs Þ. Ideal transformer identity: vps ¼ IIps ¼ nps ¼ Lps ¼ a. np ¼ n;
vA2
¼ vn 0 ¼
v vp
ns ¼ 1; vps ¼ n; n [ 1 ) vs ¼ n n .
620 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

Fig. 6.6 Closed loop functioning oscillator with transformer T1 and Hybrid Pi model (version A)

v
vp ¼ v0 ¼ vA2 ; vs ¼ vi  vA3 ; vi  vA3 ¼ vn 0 ¼ nA2 (Reference directions are
in the top of each transformer’s coil). np  ip þ ns  is ¼ 0; ip ¼ ip ðtÞ; is ¼ is ðtÞ;
ip ðtÞ
is ðtÞ¼  nnps .
For all t and all currents ip and is . The voltage vp across coil 1 does not depend
on ip or on is ; it depends only on vs . Similarly the current ip depends only on is and
is independent of vp ; vs (Fig. 6.6).
Remark: When we have two coils of wire in close physical proximity to one
another, no importance whether or not the coils are wrapped around a common core
of magnetic material. We assume that the coils do not move with respect to one
another or with respect to a core they might be wrapped around. If we have some
ferromagnetic material in the magnetic circuit of the two coils, then when the
current sufficiently large, the relation between the fluxes /p ; /s and the currents
ip ; is are no longer linear. In this case the equations have the following form:
/p ¼ fp ðip ; is Þ; /s ¼ fs ðip ; is Þ, where fp ðip ; is Þ; fs ðip ; is Þ are nonlinear functions of the
currents ip ; is , By Faraday’s law we get the following:

d/p @fp dip @fp dis


vp ¼ ¼  þ  ; fp ¼ fp ðip ; is Þ; fs ¼ fs ðip ; is Þ
dt @ip dt @is dt

d/s @fs dip @fs dis


vs ¼ ¼  þ  ; fp ¼ fp ðip ; is Þ; fs ¼ fs ðip ; is Þ
dt @ip dt @is dt

@f @f @fs @fs
The four partial derivatives ð@ipp ; @ips ; @i ; Þ are function of ip ; is (Fig. 6.7).
p @is
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis … 621

Fig. 6.7 Closed loop


functioning oscillator’s T1
transformer circuit

dðVA1  VA4 Þ VA1  VA4 VA dVA2


ICpi ¼ Cpi  ; Ir pi ¼ ; IRL ¼ 2 ; ICL ¼ CL  ;
dt r pi RL dt
vbe ¼ VA1  VA4

VA4 dVA4 VA VA dVA3


IRe ¼ ; ICe ¼ Ce  ; IR1 ¼ 3 ; IR2 ¼ 3 ; IC1 ¼ C1 
Re dt R1 R2 dt

KCL at nodes A1, A2, A3, and A4 gives the below results (Table 6.2):

np  ip þ ns  is ¼ 0; np ¼ n; ns ¼ 1; n  ip þ is ¼ 0 ) is ¼ n  ip ; n [ 1

dðVA1  VA4 Þ VA1  VA4


ICpi ¼ Cpi  ; Ir pi ¼ ) VA1  VA4 ¼ Ir pi  r pi;
dt r pi
dðIr pi  r piÞ
ICpi ¼ Cpi 
dt
dIr pi VA dðIRL  RL Þ
ICpi ¼ Cpi  r pi  ; IRL ¼ 2 ) VA2 ¼ IRL  RL ; ICL ¼ CL 
dt RL dt

Table 6.2 Closed loop KCL @ node Expression


Hybrid Pi model microwave
RF oscillator KCL@ nodes A1 is þ ICpi þ Ir pi ¼0
and expressions A2 gm  vbe þ IRL þ ICL  ip ¼ 0
A3 IR2 þ IC1 þ IR1  is ¼ 0
A4 gm  vbe þ Ir pi þ ICpi ¼ IRe þ ICe
622 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

dIRL VA dVA4 dðIRe  Re Þ


I CL ¼ C L  R L  ; IRe ¼ 4 ) VA4 ¼ IRe  Re ; ICe ¼ Ce  ¼
dt Re dt dt

dIRe VA VA
ICe ¼ Ce  Re  ; IR1 ¼ 3 ) VA3 ¼ IR1  R1 ; IR2 ¼ 3 ) VA3 ¼ IR2  R2
dt R1 R2

dVA3 dðIR1  R1 Þ dðIR2  R2 Þ dIR


IC1 ¼ C1  ¼ C1  ¼ C1  ; IC1 ¼ C1  R1  1 ;
dt dt dt dt
dIR2
IC1 ¼ C1  R2 
dt
v p np
¼ ¼ n ) vp ¼ vs  n; vs ¼ vi  VA3 ¼ VA1  VA3 ; vp ¼ VA2 ; VA2
v s ns
¼ ðVA1  VA3 Þ  n

IRL  RL ¼ ðVA1  IR1  R1 Þ  n; IRL  RL ¼ ðVA1  IR2  R2 Þ  n; Ir pi


VA  IRe  Re
¼ 1
r pi

VA1  IRe  Re
Ir pi ¼ ) VA1 ¼ Ir pi  r pi þ IRe  Re ; IRL  RL
r pi
¼ ðIr pi  r pi þ IRe  Re  IR2  R2 Þ  n

r pi Re RL
IR2 ¼ Ir pi  þ IRe  þ IR L  ; is ¼ n  ip ; n [ 1
R2 R2 n  R2

KCL @ node 1: is þ ICpi þ Ir pi ¼0

dIr pi dIr pi n 1
n  ip þ Cpi  r pi  þ Ir pi ¼0) ¼  ip   Ir pi
dt dt Cpi  r pi Cpi  r pi

KCL @ node 2: gm  vbe þ IRL þ ICL  ip ¼ 0; vbe ¼ VA1  VA4 ; vbe ¼ Ir pi  r pi

dIRL dIRL
gm  I r pi  r pi þ IRL þ CL  RL   ip ¼ 0 )
dt dt
gm  r pi 1
¼  Ir pi 
CL  RL CL  RL
1
 IRL þ  ip
CL  RL

KCL @ node 3: IR2 þ IC1 þ IR1  is ¼ 0

r pi Re RL dIR
IR 1 þ Ir pi  þ IRe  þ IR L  þ C1  R1  1 þ n  ip ¼ 0
R2 R2 n  R2 dt
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis … 623

dIR1 r pi Re RL
C1  R1  ¼ IR1  Ir pi   IRe   IRL   n  ip
dt R2 R2 n  R2

dIR1 1 r pi Re RL
¼  IR1  Ir pi   IRe   IRL 
dt C1  R1 Q
2 Q
2 Q
2
C1  Rk C1  Rk n  C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
n
  ip
C1  R1

KCL @ node 4: gm  vbe þ Ir pi þ ICpi ¼ IRe þ ICe

dIr pi dIR
gm  I r pi  r pi þ Ir pi þ Cpi  r pi  ¼ IRe þ Ce  Re  e
dt dt
n 1
gm  Ir pi  r pi þ Ir pi þ Cpi  r pi  ½  ip   Ir pi 
Cpi  r pi Cpi  r pi
dIRe
¼ IRe þ Ce  Re 
dt
dIRe gm  r pi n 1
¼  Ir pi þ  ip   IRe
dt Ce  Re Ce  Re Ce  Re

We can summery our system differential equations:

dIr pi n 1
¼  ip   Ir pi
dt Cpi  r pi Cpi  r pi

dIRL gm  r pi 1 1
¼  Ir pi   IRL þ  ip
dt CL  RL CL  RL CL  RL

dIR1 1 r pi Re RL
¼  IR1  Ir pi   IRe   IRL 
dt C1  R1 Q
2 Q
2 Q
2
C1  Rk C1  Rk n  C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
n
  ip
C1  R1

dIRe gm  r pi n 1
¼  Ir pi þ  ip   IRe
dt Ce  Re Ce  Re Ce  Re
dIr dIRL dIR1
At fixed points (equilibrium points): dt
pi
¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dIdtRe ¼ 0

gm  r pi  1 1
Ir ¼ n  ip ;  I   IRL þ  i ¼ 0
pi
CL  RL r pi
CL  RL CL  RL p
624 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

r pi Re RL
IRL ¼ ip  ð1  gm  r pi  nÞ; IR1  Ir   IRe   IRL   n  ip ¼ 0
pi
R2 R2 n  R2

Re r pi RL
IR1 þ IRe  ¼ ip  ½n  þ ð1  gm  r pi  nÞ  þ n
R2 R2 n  R2

gm  r pi  n 1
I þ  i   I ¼ 0
Ce  Re r pi
Ce  Re p Ce  Re Re

gm  r pi n 1
 n  ip þ  ip   I  ¼ 0 ) IRe ¼ ip  n  ½gm  r pi þ 1
Ce  Re Ce  Re Ce  Re Re

Re r pi RL
IR1 þ IRe  ¼ ip  ½n  þ ð1  gm  r pi  nÞ  þ n
R2 R2 n  R2
r pi RL Re
IR1 ¼ ip  fn  þ ð1  gm  r pi  nÞ  þ n þ n  ½gm  r pi þ 1  g
R2 n  R2 R2

We can summery our system fixed points: Eðip ; Ir   


pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe Þ

Eðip ; Ir   
¼ fip ; n  ip ; ip  ð1  gm  r pi  nÞ;
pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe Þ
r pi RL Re
 ip  fn  þ ð1  gm  r pi  nÞ  þ n þ n  ½gm  r pi þ 1  g;
R2 n  R2 R2
ip  n  ½gm  r pi þ 1g

Eðip ; Ir   
¼ ip  f1; n; ð1  gm  r pi  nÞ;
pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe Þ
r pi RL Re
 fn  þ ð1  gm  r pi  nÞ  þ n þ n  ½gm  r pi þ 1  g;
R2 n  R2 R2
n  ½gm  r pi þ 1g

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the closed loop functioning oscillator circuit (BJT transistor
small signal model) consists in adding to coordinate ½ip ; Ir pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe  arbitrarily
small increments of exponentially form ½i0p ; ir pi ; iRL ; iR1 ; iRe   ekt and retaining the
first order terms in ip ; Ir pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe . The system of homogenous equations leads
to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues [4]. The polynomial
characteristic equations accept by set of the below circuit variables, circuit variables
derivative and circuit variables second order derivative with respect to time into
closed loop functioning oscillator circuit [2, 3, 4]. Our closed loop functioning
oscillator circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½i0p ; ir pi ; iRL ; iR1 ; iRe   ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point),
j = 2(third fixed point), etc.,
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis … 625

ðjÞ ðjÞ
ip ðtÞ ¼ ipðjÞ þ i0p  ekt ; Ir pi ðtÞ ¼ Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt ; IRL ðtÞ ¼ IRL þ iRL  ekt ; IR1 ðtÞ
ðjÞ
¼ IR1 þ iR1  ekt

ðjÞ dIr pi ðtÞ dIRL ðtÞ


IRe ðtÞ ¼ IRe þ iRe  ekt ; ¼ ir pi  k  ekt ; ¼ iRL  k  ekt ;
dt dt
dIR1 ðtÞ
¼ iR1  k  ekt
dt
dIRe ðtÞ
¼ iRe  k  ekt
dt
dIr pi n 1
¼  ip   Ir pi
dt Cpi  r pi Cpi  r pi

n 1 ðjÞ
ir pi  k  ekt ¼  ½iðjÞ þ i0p  ekt    ½I þ ir pi  ekt 
Cpi  r pi p Cpi  r pi r pi

n 1 ðjÞ n
ir pi  k  ekt ¼  iðjÞ  I þ  i0  ekt
Cpi  r pi p Cpi  r pi r pi Cpi  r pi p
1
  ir pi  ekt
Cpi  r pi

ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point n
Cpi r pi  ip  Cpi r1 pi  Ir pi ¼0

n 1
 i0   ir pi  ir pi k¼0
Cpi  r pi p Cpi  r pi

dIRL gm  r pi 1 1
¼  Ir pi   IRL þ  ip
dt CL  RL CL  RL CL  RL

gm  r pi ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1
iRL  k  ekt ¼   ½Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt    ½I þ iRL  ekt  þ
CL  RL CL  RL RL CL  RL
 ½ip þ ip  ekt 
ðjÞ 0

gm  r pi ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1
iRL  k  ekt ¼   Ir pi   IR L þ  iðjÞ
CL  RL CL  RL CL  RL p
gm  r pi 1 1
  ir pi  ekt   iR  ekt þ  i0  ekt
CL  RL CL  RL L CL  RL p
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point  gCm rL RLpi  Ir pi  CL1RL  IRL þ 1
CL RL  ip ¼ 0
626 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

gm  r pi 1 1
  ir pi þ  i0   iR  iRL  k ¼ 0
CL  RL CL  RL p CL  RL L

dIR1 1 r pi Re RL
¼  IR1  Ir pi   IRe   IRL 
dt C1  R1 Q
2 Q
2 Q
2
C1  Rk C1  Rk n  C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
n
  ip
C1  R1

1 ðjÞ ðjÞ r pi
iR1  k  ekt ¼   ½I þ iR1  ekt   ½Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt  
C1  R1 R1 Q
2
C1  Rk
k¼1
ðjÞ Re ðjÞ RL
 ½IRe þ iRe  ekt    ½IRL þ iRL  ekt  
Q
2 Q
2
C1  Rk n  C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1
n
  ½iðjÞ þ i0p  ekt 
C1  R1 p

1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ r pi
iR1  k  ekt ¼   IR1   iR  ekt  Ir pi 
C1  R1 C1  R1 1 Q
2
C1  Rk
k¼1
r pi ðjÞ Re Re
 ir pi   ekt  IRe   iRe   ekt
Q
2 Q
2 Q
2
C1  Rk C1  Rk C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
ðjÞ RL RL
 IRL   iRL   ekt
Q
2 Q
2
n  C1  Rk n  C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1
n n
  iðjÞ   i0  ekt
C1  R1 p C1  R1 p
1 ðjÞ ðjÞ r pi ðjÞ Re ðjÞ RL
iR1  k  ekt ¼   I  Ir pi   IR e   IR L 
C1  R1 R1 Q
2 Q
2 Q
2
C1  Rk C1  Rk n  C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
n 1 r pi
  iðjÞ   iR  ekt  ir pi   ekt
C 1  R1 p C 1  R1 1 Q
2
C1  Rk
k¼1
Re kt RL n
 iRe  e  iRL   ekt   i0  ekt
Q
2 Q
2 C 1  R1 p
C1  Rk n  C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis … 627

At fixed point

1 ðjÞ ðjÞ r pi ðjÞ Re


  I  Ir pi   IRe 
C1  R1 R1 Q
2 Q
2
C1  Rk C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1
ðjÞ RL n
 IRL    iðjÞ ¼ 0
Q
2 C1  R1 p
n  C1  Rk
k¼1

1 r pi Re
  iR  iR1  k  ir pi   iRe 
C1  R1 1 Q
2 Q
2
C1  Rk C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1
RL n
 iRL    i0 ¼ 0
Q
2 C1  R1 p
n  C1  Rk
k¼1

dIRe gm  r pi n 1
¼  Ir pi þ  ip   IRe
dt Ce  Re Ce  Re Ce  Re

gm  r pi ðjÞ n 1
iRe  k  ekt ¼  ½Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt  þ  ½ipðjÞ þ i0p  ekt  
Ce  Re Ce  Re Ce  Re
ðjÞ
 ½IRe þ iRe  ekt 

gm  r pi ðjÞ gm  r pi n n
iRe  k  ekt ¼  Ir pi þ  ir pi  ekt þ  ipðjÞ þ  i0  ekt
C e  Re Ce  Re Ce  Re Ce  Re p
1 ðjÞ 1
  IRe   iR  ekt
C e  Re C e  Re e

gm  r pi ðjÞ n 1 ðjÞ
iRe  k  ekt ¼ I þ  iðjÞ  I
Ce  Re r pi Ce  Re p Ce  Re Re
gm  r pi n 1
þ  ir pi  ekt þ  i0p  ekt   iR  ekt
Ce  Re Ce  Re Ce  Re e

gm r pi ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


At fixed point Ce Re  Ir pi þ n
Ce Re  ip  Ce1Re  IRe ¼ 0

gm  r pi n 1
 ir pi þ  i0   iR  iRe  k ¼ 0
Ce  Re Ce  Re p Ce  Re e

We can summery our arbitrarily small increments equations:

n 1
 i0p   ir pi  ir pi k¼0
Cpi  r pi Cpi  r pi
628 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

gm  r pi 1 1
  ir pi þ  i0   iR  iRL  k ¼ 0
CL  RL CL  RL p CL  RL L

1 r pi Re
  iR  iR1  k  ir pi   iRe 
C1  R1 1 Q
2 Q
2
C1  Rk C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1
RL n
 iRL    i0 ¼ 0
Q
2 C1  R1 p
n  C1  Rk
k¼1

gm  r pi n 1
 ir pi þ  i0   iR  iRe  k ¼ 0
Ce  Re Ce  Re p Ce  Re e
0 n 1
0 1 Cpi r pi
N11 ... N14 B 1 C
B . .. .. C   B C R C 0
B . C B L L C  i ¼ 0;
@ . . . A  ir pi iRL iR1 iRe þ B n C p
@  C1 R1 A
N41  N44 n
Ce Re
0 1 0 ir pi 1
N11 ... N14
B . B i C
B . .. .. C
CB RL C
@ . . . A B C0
@ iR1 A
N41  N44 i Re

1 gm  r pi
N11 ¼   k; N12 ¼ N13 ¼ N14 ¼ 0; N21 ¼  ;
Cpi  r pi CL  RL
1
N22 ¼ k
CL  RL

r pi RL 1
N23 ¼ N24 ¼ 0; N31 ¼  ; N32 ¼  ; N33 ¼  k
Q
2 Q
2 C1  R1
C1  Rk n  C1  Rk
k¼1 k¼1

Re gm  r pi 1
N34 ¼  ; N41 ¼ ; N42 ¼ N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼  k
Q
2 Ce  Re Ce  Re
C1  Rk
k¼1

Assumption: Arbitrarily small increment i0p is very small compare to other


system arbitrarily small increments ðir pi ; iRL ; iR1 ; iRe Þ.
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis … 629

0 1
n
Cpi r pi
0 1
B 1 C N11 . . . N14
B C R C 0 B . .. .. C
B L L C  i ! e; ðA  k  IÞ ¼ B . C
B n C p @ . . . A;
@ C1 R1 A
n N41    N44
Ce Re
0 1
N11 . . . N14
B . .. .. C
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ detB
@ .. .
C
. A
N41    N44

1 1 1 1
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ k4 þ k3  ½ þ þ þ 
C1  R1 Ce  Re Cpi  r pi CL  RL
1 1 1 1 1
þ k2  ½ þð þ Þð þ Þ
C1  R1  Ce  Re Cpi  r pi CL  RL C 1  R1 C e  Re
1 1 1 1
þ  þ k  f½ þ 
Cpi  r pi  CL  RL Cpi  r pi CL  RL C1  R1  Ce  Re
1 1 1
þ½ þ  g
C1  R1 Ce  Re Cpi  r pi  CL  RL
1
þ
Cpi  r pi  CL  RL  C1  R1  Ce  Re

1 1 1 1
!4 ¼ 1; !3 ¼ þ þ þ
C1  R1 Ce  Re Cpi  r pi CL  RL

1 1 1
!2 ¼ þð þ Þ
C1  R1  Ce  Re Cpi  r pi CL  RL
1 1 1
ð þ Þþ
C1  R1 Ce  Re Cpi  r pi  CL  RL

1 1 1 1 1
!1 ¼ ½ þ  þ½ þ 
Cpi  r pi CL  RL C1  R1  Ce  Re C1  R1 Ce  Re
1

Cpi  r pi  CL  RL

1 X
4
!0 ¼ ; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ !k  kk
Cpi  r pi  CL  RL  C1  R1  Ce  Re k¼0

Eigenvalues stability discussion: Our closed loop functioning oscillator circuit


(BJT transistor small signal model) involving N variables (N > 2, N = 5, arbitrarily
small increments), the characteristic equation is of degree N = 4 (we exclude small
increment i0p ) and must often be solved numerically. Expect in some particular
cases, such an equation has (N = 4) distinct roots that can be real or complex. These
values are the eigenvalues of the 4 × 4 Jacobian matrix (A).
630 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

The general rule is that the closed loop functioning oscillator circuit is stable if
there is no eigenvalue with positive real part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is
positive for the steady state to be unstable. Our 5-variables ðip ; Ir pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe Þ
system has four eigenvalues (reduce to four system arbitrarily small increments).
The type of behavior can be characterized as a function of the position of these
eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be distinguished:
(1) the four eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), (2) the four
eigenvalues are real, two of them are negative (unstable steady state), (3) and
(4) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and other two
real are negative (stable steady state), two cases can be distinguished depending on
the relative value of the real part of the complex eigenvalues and of the real one,
(5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and the other
two real are positive (unstable steady state) [2, 3].

X
4 X
4
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ !k  kk ; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) ! k  kk ¼ 0
k¼0 k¼0

We suppose k1 ; k2 ; k3 ; k4 all (known) eigenvalues of the linearized system.


We are interesting to get oscillations from the closed loop functioning oscillator
circuit. To get oscillations, we need eigenvalue of A is on imaginary axis, and then
the method of the center manifold is applied. The center manifold of an equilibrium
point (fixed point) of our dynamical system consists of orbits whose behavior
around the equilibrium point is not controlled by either the attraction of the stable
manifold or the repulsion of the unstable manifold. Closed loop functioning
oscillator circuit eigenvalues which corresponding to eigenvalues with negative real
part form the stable Eigen space, which gives rise to the stable manifold.
Eigenvalue with positive real part yield the unstable manifold. If there are eigen-
values whose real part is zero, then these give rise to the center manifold. If the
eigenvalues are precisely zero, then these more specifically give rise to a slow
manifold.

6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis

There are types of transistor oscillators which use feedback and lumped inductance
and capacitance resonators. These oscillators are like their low frequency coun-
terparts and very small values of inductance and capacitance must be used to make
them resonate at microwave frequencies. A common base configuration is used for
oscillators, although common emitter configurations can be used. The transistor
input and output are matched and feedback is supplied from the output to the input.
The feedback circuit contains the resonator, which controls the oscillation fre-
quency. There are three types of transistor LC oscillators, Colpitts, Hartley and
Clapp. These oscillators differ only in the way that the feedback is applied. In the
6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 631

Hartley oscillator, the feedback is supplied by the inductive divider formed by two
inductors. The advantages of the Hartley oscillator are oscillator’s frequency may
be adjusted using a single variable capacitor (one side of which can be earthed),
oscillator’s output amplitude remains constant over the frequency range, either a
tapped coil or two fixed inductors are needed, and easy to create an accurate fixed
frequency crystal oscillator variation (it is done by replacing the capacitor with a
quartz crystal). The disadvantage of Hartley oscillator is the fact that harmonic rich
output if taken from the amplifier and not directly from the LC circuit. Basic LC
oscillator circuits have no means of controlling the amplitude of the oscillations and
it is difficult to tune the oscillator to the required frequency. Hartley Oscillator
configuration has a tuned tank circuit with its resonant coil tapped to feed a fraction
of the output signal back to the emitter of the transistor. The output of the transistors
emitter is always “in-phase” with the output at the collector, this feedback signal is
positive. The oscillating frequency which is a sine-wave voltage is determined by
the resonance frequency of the tank circuit [9, 10] (Fig. 6.8).
Resistor R1 provide the usual stabilizing DC bias for the transistor. L1 is the Radio
Frequency Coil (RFC). It is an RF Choke which has a high reactance at the fre-
quency of oscillations so most of the RF current is applied to the LC tanking circuit

Fig. 6.8 Hartley oscillator circuit


632 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

via capacitor C2 and the DC component passes through L1 to the power supply. We
use for our stability analysis the BJT NPN transistor Small Signal (SS) model
equivalent circuit (Hybrid Pi model Version A). We consider “AC ground” in the
circuit. Since the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there is no time
variation of the voltage. Consequently, we can set this terminal to be an “AC
ground” in the small signal circuit. For AC ground, we “kill” the DC sources at that
terminal (short circuit voltage sources and open circuit current sources). (Fig. 6.9).

VL1 ¼ VA1 ; VL3 ¼ VA3 ; VL2 ¼ VA4 ; VC3 ¼ VA4  VA3 ; vbe ¼ VA2 ;
dIL
VA1 ¼ VL1 ¼ L1  1 ; VC2 ¼ VA1  VA4
dt
dðVA1  VA4 Þ dIL
I C2 ¼ C 2  ; VL2 ¼ VA4 ¼ L2  2 ;
dt dt
dIL3
V L3 ¼ VA3 ¼ L3  ; VC1 ¼ VA2  VA3
dt

Fig. 6.9 Hartley oscillator Hybrid Pi model (Version A) schematic


6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 633

dðVA2  VA3 Þ dVA2


IC1 ¼ C1  ; VCpi ¼ VA2 ; ICpi ¼ Cpi  ;
dt dt
VA VA  VA2
Ir pi ¼ 2 ; VR1 ¼ VA1  VA2 ; IR1 ¼ 1
r pi R1

KCL @ node A1: IR1 þ gm  vbe þ IC2 þ IL1 ¼ 0, KCL @ node A2:
IR1 ¼ IC1 þ ICpi þ Ir pi
KCL @ node A3: IC1 þ IC3 ¼ IL3 , KCL @ node A4: IC2 ¼ IL2 þ IC3
Z
dIL1 dðVA1  VA4 Þ 1
VA1 ¼ VL1 ¼ L1  ; IC2 ¼ C2  ) VA1  VA4 ¼  IC2  dt;
dt dt C2
Z
1
VA4 ¼ VA1   IC2  dt
C2
Z
d 1 dVA4 dVA1 1
fVA4 ¼ VA1   IC2  dtg ) ¼   I C2 ;
dt C2 dt dt C2
Z
dIL 1
VA4 ¼ L1  1   IC2  dt
dt C2
Z
dIL2 dIL dIL 1 d 2 I L2
VA4 ¼ L2  ) L2  2 ¼ L1  1   IC2  dt; L2 
dt dt dt C2 dt2
2
d IL 1
¼ L1  2 1   I C2
dt C2
Z
dIL3 dðVA2  VA3 Þ 1
VA3 ¼ L3  ; IC1 ¼ C1  ) VA2  VA3 ¼  IC1  dt;
dt dt C1
Z
1
VA2 ¼ VA3 þ  IC1  dt
C1
Z Z
dIL3 1 dVA2 1
VA2 ¼ L3  þ  IC1  dt; ICpi ¼ Cpi  ) VA2 ¼  ICpi  dt
dt C1 dt Cpi
Z Z Z
1 dIL3 1 d 1
 ICpi  dt ¼ L3  þ  IC  dt; f  ICpi  dt
Cpi dt C1 Z 1 dt Cpi
dIL3 1
¼ L3  þ  IC1  dtg
dt C1

1 d 2 IL 1 VA2
 ICpi ¼ L3  2 3 þ  I C1 ; I r pi ¼ ) VA2 ¼ Ir pi  r pi;
Cpi dt C1 r pi
VA  VA2
IR1 ¼ 1
R1
634 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

VA1  VA2 ¼ IR1  R1 ) VA1 ¼ VA2 þ IR1  R1 ; VA1 ¼ Ir pi  r pi þ IR1  R1 ;


VA1 ¼ Ir pi  r pi þ IR1  R1

dIL1 dIL dIL1 r pi R1


VA1 ¼ L1  ; L1  1 ¼ Ir pi  r pi þ IR1  R1 ; ¼ Ir pi  þ IR1 
dt dt dt L1 L1

d 2 IL1 dIr pi r pi dIR1 R1 d 2 IL2


¼  þ  ; L2 
dt2 dt L1 dt L1 dt2
dIr pi r pi dIR1 R1 1
¼ L1  ½  þ    IC2
dt L1 dt L1 C2

d 2 IL2 dIr pi dIR1 1


L2  ¼  r pi þ  R1   IC2 ;
dt2 dt dt C2
d 2 IL2 dIr pi r pi dIR1 R1 1
¼  þ    I C2
dt2 dt L2 dt L2 C2  L2

We can summery our Hartley oscillator differential equation:

d 2 IL2 dIr pi dIR1 1


L2  2
¼  r pi þ  R1   I C2
dt dt dt C2

dIL1 r pi R1 1 d 2 IL 1
¼ Ir pi  þ IR1  ;  ICpi ¼ L3  2 3 þ  I C1
dt L1 L1 Cpi dt C1

dIL2 dIr
We define for simplicity the following new variables: dt ¼ Y1 ; dt
pi
¼ Y2

dIR1 dIL d 2 IL dY1 d 2 IL3 dY4


¼ Y3 ; 3 ¼ Y4 ; 2 2 ¼ ; ¼
dt dt dt dt dt2 dt
dY1 r pi R1 1 dY4 1 1
¼ Y2  þ Y3    I C2 ; ¼  ICpi   I C1
dt L2 L2 C2  L2 dt Cpi  L3 C1  L3

Our circuit KCLs @ nodes A1 – A4: IR1 þ gm  Ir pi  r pi þ IC2 þ IL1 ¼ 0

IR1 ¼ IC1 þ ICpi þ Ir pi ; IC1 þ IC3 ¼ IL3 ; IC2 ¼ IL2 þ IC3

IC2 ¼ IL1  gm  r pi  Ir pi  IR1 ; ICpi ¼ IR1  IC1  Ir pi ; IC1 ¼ IL3  IC3 ; IC3 ¼ IC2  IL2
IC1 ¼ IL3  ½IC2  IL2  ¼ IL3  IC2 þ IL2 ; IC1 ¼ IL3 þ IL2  ½IL1  gm  r pi  Ir pi  IR1 

X
3
IC1 ¼ IL3 þ IL2 þ IL1 þ gm  r pi  Ir pi þ IR1 ; IC1 ¼ ILk þ gm  r pi  Ir pi þ IR1
k¼1
6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 635

X3
ICpi ¼ IR1  Ir pi ½ ILk þ gm  r pi  Ir pi þ IR1 ;
k¼1
X
3
ICpi ¼ Ir pi  ½1 þ gm  r pi  I Lk
k¼1

We can summery our intermediate results:


X
3 X
3
ICpi ¼ Ir pi  ½1 þ gm  r pi  I Lk ; I C1 ¼ ILk þ gm  r pi  Ir pi þ IR 1
k¼1 k¼1

IC2 ¼ IL1  gm  r pi  Ir pi  IR1

&&&
dY1 r pi R1 1
¼ Y2  þ Y3    I C2
dt L2 L2 C2  L2
r pi R1 1
¼ Y2  þ Y3    ½IL1  gm  r pi  Ir pi  IR1 
L2 L2 C2  L2

dY1 r pi R1 1 1 1
¼ Y2  þ Y3  þ  I L1 þ  gm  r pi  Ir pi þ  IR1
dt L2 L2 C2  L2 C2  L2 C2  L2

dY4 1 X
3
¼  ½Ir pi  ½1 þ gm  r pi  I Lk 
dt Cpi  L3 k¼1

1 X
3
 ½ IL þ gm  r pi  Ir pi þ IR1 
C1  L3 k¼1 k

dY4 Ir pi ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 X 3
¼ ð þ Þ½ þ   IL
dt L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1
  IR1
C1  L3

We can summery our system differential equations:


dY1 r pi R1 1 1 1
¼ Y2  þ Y3  þ  I L1 þ  gm  r pi  Ir pi þ  IR1
dt L2 L2 C2  L2 C2  L2 C2  L2

dY4 Ir pi ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 X 3
¼ ð þ Þ½ þ   IL
dt L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1
  IR1
C1  L3
636 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

dIL2 dIr pi dIR dIL dIL r pi R1


¼ Y1 ; ¼ Y2 ; 1 ¼ Y3 ; 3 ¼ Y4 ; 1 ¼ Ir pi  þ IR1 
dt dt dt dt dt L1 L1

At fixed points:

dY1 dY4 dIL dIr pi dIR dIL dIL


¼ 0; ¼ 0; 2 ¼ 0; ¼ 0; 1 ¼ 0; 3 ¼ 0; 1 ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt
R1
Y1 ¼ 0; Y2 ¼ 0; Y3 ¼ 0; Y4 ¼ 0; r pi  Ir pi þ IR1  R1 ¼ 0 ) Ir pi ¼ IR1 
r pi

1 1 1
 I þ  gm  r pi  Ir þ  I ¼ 0
C2  L2 L1 C2  L2 pi
C2  L2 R1

Ir pi ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 X 3
1
 ð þ Þ½ þ   I   I ¼ 0
L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Lk C1  L3 R1

We get two fixed points equations:

IL1 þ IR1  ð1  gm  R1 Þ ¼ 0

R1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 1 X 3
IR1  f ð þ Þ g½ þ   I
r pi  L3 Cpi C1 C1  L3 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Lk
¼0

R1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 1
IR1  f ð þ Þ g½ þ 
r pi  L3 Cpi C1 C1  L 3 Cpi C1 L3
X3
 ½IL1 þ ILk  ¼ 0
k¼2
X
3 X
3
ILk ¼ IL1 þ ILk ; IL1 þ IR1  ð1  gm  R1 Þ ¼ 0 ) IL1 ¼ IR1  ð1  gm  R1 Þ
k¼1 k¼2

R1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 1
IR1  f ð þ Þ g½ þ    IL1
r pi  L3 Cpi C1 C1  L3 Cpi C1 L3
1 1 1 X  3
½ þ   I ¼0
Cpi C1 L3 k¼2 Lk
6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 637

R1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 ð1  gm  R1 Þ 
IR1  f ð þ Þ gþ½ þ   IR1
r pi  L3 Cpi C1 C1  L 3 Cpi C1 L3
1 1 1 X 3
½ þ   I ¼ 0
Cpi C1 L3 k¼2 Lk

R1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 ð1  gm  R1 Þ
IR1  f ð þ Þ þ½ þ  g
r pi  L3 Cpi C1 C1  L3 Cpi C1 L3
1 1 1 X 3
½ þ   I ¼ 0
Cpi C1 L3 k¼2 Lk

P
3
½C1pi þ C1 
1
 L13  ILk
IR1
k¼2
¼ R1
r piL3  ð½1 þ gCmpir pi
þ gm r pi
C1 Þ  1
C1 L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1 
1
 ð1gLm3 R1 Þ

P
3
ð1  gm  R1 Þ  ½C1pi þ C1 
1
 L13  ILk
IL1 ¼
k¼2
R1
r piL3  ð½1 þ gCmpir pi
þ gm r pi
C1 Þ  C11L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1 
1
 ð1gLm3 R1 Þ

P
3
 r R1pi  ½C1pi þ C1 
1
 L13  ILk
Ir
k¼2
¼
 ð½1 þ gCmpir gm r pi
 ð1gLm3 R1 Þ
pi pi
R1
r piL3 þ C1 Þ  C11L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1 
1

We can define our system fixed points as E ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Ir    
pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 ; IL3 Þ
We define three global parameters in our system: C1 ; C2 ; C3

C1 ¼ C1 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ; C2 ¼ C1 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ;


C3 ¼ C3 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ

½C1pi þ C1 
1
 L13
C1 ¼ R1
r piL3  ð½1 þ gCmpir pi
þ gm r pi
C1 Þ  C11L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1 
1
 ð1gLm3 R1 Þ

ð1  gm  R1 Þ  ½C1pi þ C1 
1
 L13
C2 ¼ R1
r piL3  ð½1 þ gCmpir pi
þ gm r pi
C1 Þ  C11L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1 
1
 ð1gLm3 R1 Þ

 r R1pi  ½C1pi þ C1 
1
 L13
C3 ¼ R1
r piL3  ð½1 þ gCmpir pi
þ gm r pi
C1 Þ  C11L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1 
1
 ð1gLm3 R1 Þ
638 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

X
3 X
3
IR1 ¼ C1 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ  ILk ; IL1 ¼ C2 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ  ILk
k¼2 k¼2

X
3
Ir pi ¼ C3 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ  ILk
k¼2

X
3
E  ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Ir    
pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 ; IL3 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0; C3 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ  ILk ;
k¼2
X
3 X
3
C1 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ  ILk ; C2 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ  ILk ; IL2 ; IL3 Þ
k¼2 k¼2

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the Hartley oscillator circuit (BJT transistor small signal
model) consists in adding to coordinate [Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Ir pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 ; IL3 ] arbi-
trarily small increments of exponentially form ½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ; ir pi ; iR1 ; iL1 ; iL2 ; iL3  
ekt and retaining the first order terms in Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Ir pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 ; IL3 . The
system of homogenous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in
the eigenvalues [4]. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set of the
below circuit variables, circuit variables derivative and circuit variables second
order derivative with respect to time into Hartley oscillator circuit [2, 3, 4]. Our
Hartley oscillator fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ; ir pi ; iR1 ; iL1 ; iL2 ; iL3   ekt are: j = 0(first fixed point), j = 1(second
fixed point), j = 2(third fixed point), etc.,

ðjÞ ðjÞ
Ir pi ðtÞ ¼ Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt ; IR1 ðtÞ ¼ IR1 þ iR1  ekt ;
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt ; IL2 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 þ iL2  ekt

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


IL3 ðtÞ ¼ IL3 þ iL3  ekt ; Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ;
ðjÞ
Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt

ðjÞ dY1 ðtÞ


Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt ; ¼ y1  k  ekt ;
dt
dY4 ðtÞ dIr pi ðtÞ
¼ y4  k  ekt ; ¼ ir pi  k  ekt
dt dt
dIR1 ðtÞ dIL ðtÞ
¼ iR1  k  ekt ; 1 ¼ iL1  k  ekt ;
dt dt
dIL2 ðtÞ kt dIL3 ðtÞ
¼ i L2  k  e ; ¼ iL3  k  ekt
dt dt
6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 639

&&&

dY1 r pi R1 1 1 1
¼ Y2  þ Y3  þ  IL þ  gm  r pi  Ir pi þ  IR1
dt L2 L2 C2  L2 1 C2  L2 C2  L2

ðjÞ r pi ðjÞ R1 1 ðjÞ


y1  k  ekt ¼ ½Y2 þ y2  ekt   þ ½Y3 þ y3  ekt   þ  ½I þ iL1  ekt 
L2 L2 C2  L2 L1
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
þ  gm  r pi  ½Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt  þ  ½I þ iR1  ekt 
C2  L2 C2  L2 R1

r pi
ðjÞ ðjÞ R1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
y1  k  ekt ¼ Y2  þ Y3  þ  I L1 þ  gm  r pi  Ir pi
L2 L2 C2  L2 C2  L2
1 ðjÞ r pi kt R1 1
þ  I þ y2   e þ y3   ekt þ  iL  ekt
C2  L2 R1 L2 L2 C2  L2 1
1 1
þ  gm  r pi  ir pi  ekt þ  iR  ekt
C2  L2 C2  L2 1

At fixed point:

ðjÞ r pi ðjÞ R1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ


Y2  þ Y3  þ  I L1 þ  gm  r pi  Ir pi þ I ¼0
L2 L2 C2  L2 C2  L2 C2  L2 R1

r pi kt R1 1
 y1  k  ekt þ y2   e þ y3   ekt þ  iL  ekt
L2 L2 C2  L2 1
1 1
þ  gm  r pi  ir pi  ekt þ  iR  ekt ¼ 0
C2  L2 C2  L2 1

Dividing the two sides of the above equation by ekt term:

r pi R1 1 1
 y1  k þ y2  þ y3  þ  iL þ  gm  r pi  ir pi
L2 L2 C2  L2 1 C2  L2
1
þ  iR ¼ 0
C2  L2 1

dY4 Ir pi ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 X 3
¼ ð þ Þ½ þ   IL
dt L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1
  IR1
C1  L3
640 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

1 ðjÞ ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi
y4  k  ekt ¼   ½I  ekt   ð
þ ir pi þ Þ
L3 r pi Cpi C1
1 1 1 X 3
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½ þ   ðI þ iLk  ekt Þ   ½I þ iR1  ekt 
Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Lk C1  L3 R1

1 ðjÞ ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi
y4  k  ekt ¼   Ir pi  ð þ Þ
L3 Cpi C1
1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi
  ir pi  ð þ Þ  ekt
L3 Cpi C1
1 1 1 X 3
ðjÞ 1 1 1 X 3
½ þ   I Lk  ½ þ   iL  ekt
Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1 ðjÞ 1
  IR1   iR  ekt
C1  L3 C1  L3 1

1 ðjÞ ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi
y4  k  ekt ¼  I ð þ Þ
L3 r pi Cpi C1
1 1 1 X 3
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½ þ   I  I
Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Lk C1  L3 R1
1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi
  ir pi ð þ Þ  ekt
L3 Cpi C1
1 1 1 X 3
1
½ þ   iL  ekt   iR  ekt
Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k C1  L3 1

At fixed point:

1 ðjÞ ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 X 3
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
  Ir pi  ð þ Þ½ þ   I  I
L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Lk C1  L3 R1
¼0

1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1
y4  k  ekt ¼   ir pi  ð þ Þ  ekt  ½ þ 
L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3
X3
1
 iLk  ekt   iR1  ekt
k¼1
C 1  L 3
6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 641

Dividing the two sides of the above equation by ekt term:

1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 X 3
 y4  k   ir pi ð þ Þ½ þ   iL
L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1
  iR ¼ 0
C1  L3 1

dIL2 dIr pi dIR dIL


¼ Y1 ; ¼ Y2 ; 1 ¼ Y3 ; 3 ¼ Y4
dt dt dt dt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
iL2  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; ir pi  k  ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; iR1  k  ekt ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt
ðjÞ
iL3  k  ekt ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt

At fixed point:

Y1 ¼ 0; Y2 ¼ 0; Y3 ¼ 0; Y4 ¼ 0

iL2  k þ y1 ¼ 0;  ir pi  k þ y2 ¼ 0;  iR1  k þ y3 ¼ 0; iL3  k þ y4 ¼ 0

dIL1 r pi R1
¼ Ir pi þ IR1  ; iL1  k  ekt

dt L1 L1
ðjÞ kt r pi ðjÞ R1
¼ ½Ir pi þ ir pi  e   þ ½IR1 þ iR1  ekt  
L1 L1

ðjÞ r pi ðjÞ R1 r pi kt R1


iL1  k  ekt ¼ Ir pi  þ IR1  þ ir pi   e þ iR1   ekt
L1 L1 L1 L1

At fixed point :

ðjÞ r pi ðjÞ R1
Ir pi  þ IR 1  ¼ 0:
L1 L1

We get iL1  k þ ir pi  r L1pi þ iR1  RL11 ¼ 0.


We can summery our Hartley oscillator circuit (BJT transistor small signal
model) arbitrarily small increments equations:

r pi R1 1 1
 y1  k þ y2  þ y3  þ  iL þ  gm  r pi  ir pi
L2 L2 C2  L2 1 C2  L2
1
þ  iR ¼ 0
C2  L2 1
642 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi 1 1 1 X 3
 y4  k   ir pi ð þ Þ½ þ   iL
L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1
  iR ¼ 0
C1  L3 1

iL2  k þ y1 ¼ 0;  ir pi  k þ y2 ¼ 0;  iR1  k þ y3 ¼ 0; iL3  k þ y4 ¼ 0

r pi R1
iL1  k þ ir pi  þ iR1  ¼0
L1 L1
0 1 0 r pi R1 1
y1 L2 L2
B y C B C
0 1 B
B
4 C
C B
B 0 0C
C
N11 ... N17 B ir pi C B 0C
B . B C B 1 C y 
B . .. .. CCB C B C 2
@ . . . A B R1 C
B i þB 0 1 C ¼ 0;
C B C y3
B iL C B C
N71  N77 B 1 C B 0 0C
B C B C
@ i L2 A @ 0 0A
i L3 0 0
0 1
y1
B y C
0 1 B
B
4 C
C
N11 ... N17 B ir pi C
B . C B C
B . .. .. C B C
@ . . . AB
B
iR1 C  0
C
B iL C
N71  N77 B 1 C
B C
@ i L2 A
i L3

Assumption: arbitrarily small increments: y2 ! e; y3 ! e


0r pi R1
1
L2 L2
B C
B 0 0 C
B C
B C  
B 1 0 C
B C y2
B 0 1 C ! e; N11 ¼ k; N12 ¼ 0;
B C y
B C 3
B 0 0C
B C
@ 0 0A
0 0
1 1
N13 ¼  gm  r pi; N14 ¼
C2  L2 C2  L2
6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 643

1
N15 ¼ ; N16 ¼ N17 ¼ 0; N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ k;
C2  L2
1 ½1 þ gm  r pi gm  r pi
N23 ¼ ð þ Þ
L3 Cpi C1

1 1 1 1
N24 ¼  ; N25 ¼ N26 ¼ N27 ¼ ½ þ   ; N31 ¼ N32 ¼ 0; N33 ¼ k
C1  L3 Cpi C1 L3

N34 ¼ N35 ¼ N36 ¼ N37 ¼ 0; N41 ¼ N42 ¼ N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k; N45 ¼ N46 ¼ N47
¼0

r pi R1
N51 ¼ N52 ¼ 0; N53 ¼ ; N54 ¼ ; N55 ¼ k; N56 ¼ N57 ¼ 0; N61 ¼ 1; N62
L1 L1
¼0

N63 ¼ N64 ¼ N65 ¼ 0; N66 ¼ k; N67 ¼ 0; N71 ¼ 0; N72 ¼ 1; N73 ¼ N74 ¼ N75
¼ N76 ¼ 0
0 1
N11 . . . N17
B .. .. .. C
N77 ¼ k; ðA  k  IÞ ¼ @ . . . A ; detðA  k  IÞ
0 N
171    N77
N11 . . . N17
B .. .. .. C
¼ det@ . . . A
N71    N77

1 1 1
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ k7  k5  ½ þ  ; detðA  k  IÞ
Cpi C1 L3
1 1 1
¼ k5  ðk2 þ ½ þ  Þ
Cpi C1 L3

If an eigenvalue of A is on the imaginary axis, then the method of the center


manifold must be applied. To apply the stability criterion of Liapunov to our
system, the equation detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 has a zero in the left half plane, without
calculating the eigenvalues explicitly [2, 3].
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 1 1 1 1
k1 ¼ k2 ¼ . . . ¼ k5 ¼ 0; k þ ½ þ   ¼ 0 ) k6;7 ¼ j 
2
½ þ 
Cpi C1 L3 Cpi C1 L3
644 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis

The Colpitt’s oscillator is designed for generation of high frequency sinusoidal


oscillations (radio frequencies ranging from 10 kHz to 100 MHz). They are widely
used in commercial signal generators up to 100 MHz. Colpitt’s oscillator is same as
Hartley oscillator except for one difference. Instead of using a tapped inductance,
Colpitt’s oscillator uses a tapped capacitance. The circuit diagram of Colpitt’s
oscillator using BJT. It consists of an R-C coupled amplifier using an NPN tran-
sistor in CE configuration. R1 is resistor which forms a voltage bias to the transistor.
We can connect resistor RE which stabilizes the circuit against temperature varia-
tion (not in our circuit). If we connect RE resistor then a capacitor CE is connected
parallel with RE, acts as a bypass capacitor provides a low reactive path to the
amplified AC signal. The coupling capacitor C2 blocks DC and provides an AC
path from collector to the tank circuit [25, 26] (Fig. 6.10).
The feedback network (tank circuit) consists of two capacitors C3, C4 (in series)
which placed across a common inductor L2. The Centre of the two capacitors is
tapped (grounded). The feedback network (C3, C4, and L2) determines the frequency
of oscillation of the oscillator. The two capacitors C3, C4 form the potential divider
led for providing the feedback voltage. The voltage developed across the capacitor

Fig. 6.10 Colpitts oscillator circuit


6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 645

Fig. 6.11 Colpitts oscillator Hybrid Pi model (Version A) circuit

C4 provides regenerative feedback which is essential for sustained oscillators. We use


for our stability analysis the BJT NPN transistor Small Signal (SS) model equivalent
circuit (Hybrid Pi model Version A). We consider “AC ground” in the circuit. Since
the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there is no time variation of the
voltage. Consequently, we can set this terminal to be an “AC ground” in the small
signal circuit. For AC ground, we “kill” the DC sources at that terminal (short circuit
voltage sources and open circuit current sources) (Fig. 6.11)..

VA1  VA2 dIL VA2 dVCpi


IR1 ¼ ; VL1 ¼ VA1 ¼ L1  1 ; vbe ¼ VA2 ; Ir pi ¼ ; IC ¼ Cpi 
R1 dt r pi pi dt
dVA2
¼ Cpi 
dt

dðVA1  VA4 Þ dVA3 dVA4


IC2 ¼ C2  ; IC4 ¼ C4  ; IC3 ¼ C3  ; VC3 ¼ VA4 ; VC4
dt dt dt
dIL2
¼ VA3 ; VL2 ¼ L2 
dt

VL2 ¼ VA4  VA3 ; VC1 ¼ VA2  VA3 ; VA2 ¼ VCpi ; VR1 ¼ VA1  VA2 ; VL1 ¼ VA1 ; IC1
dðVA2  VA3 Þ
¼ C1 
dt
646 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

KCL @ node A1: IR1 þ gm  vbe þ IL1 þ IC2 ¼ 0; KCL @ node A2:
IR1 ¼ IC1 þ ICpi þ Ir pi
KCL @ node A3: IC1 þ IL2 ¼ IC4 ; KCL @ node A4: IC2 ¼ IC3 þ IL2

VA2 VA1  VA2


Ir pi ¼ ) VA2 ¼ Ir pi  r pi; IR1 ¼ ) VA1  VA2 ¼ IR1  R1 ; VA1
r pi R1
dIL
¼ L1  1
dt
Z
dIL1 dVA2 1
L1   Ir pi  r pi ¼ IR1  R1 ; ICpi ¼ Cpi  ) VA2 ¼  ICpi  dt
dt dt Cpi
Z
dðVA1  VA4 Þ 1 dVA3
I C2 ¼ C 2  ) VA1  VA4 ¼  IC2  dt; IC4 ¼ C4  ) VA3
Z dt C2 dt
1
¼  IC4  dt
C4
Z
dVA4 1 dIL
I C3 ¼ C3  ) VA4 ¼  IC3  dt; VA4  VA3 ¼ L2  2
Zdt C 3Z dt
1 1 dIL2
)  IC3  dt   IC4  dt ¼ L2 
C3 C4 dt
Z Z
d 1 1 dIL2 1 1 d 2 IL
f  IC3  dt   IC4  dt ¼ L2  g)  IC 3   I C4 ¼ L 2  2 2
dt C3 C4 dt C3 C4 dt
Z
dðVA1  VA4 Þ 1
IC2 ¼ C2  ) VA1  VA4 ¼  IC2  dt; VA1  VA4
Z dt C2
1
¼  IC2  dt
C2
Z Z Z
dIL 1 1 d dIL1 1
L1  1   I C3  dt ¼  IC  dt; fL1    IC3  dt
dt C3 C2 Z 2 dt dt C3
1
¼  IC2  dtg
C2

d 2 I L1 1 1 dðVA2  VA3 Þ
L1    IC3 ¼  IC ; IC ¼ C1  ) VA2  VA3
dt2 C3 C2 Z 2 1 dt
1
¼  IC1  dt
C1
Z Z Z
1 1 d 1
Ir pi  r pi   IC4  dt ¼  IC  dt; fI r pi  r pi   IC4  dt
C4 C1 Z 1 dt C4
1
¼  IC1  dtg
C1
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 647

dIr pi 1 1
 r pi   IC4 ¼  I C1
dt C4 C1

We can summery our Colpitt’s oscillator differential equations:

dIL1 1 1 d 2 IL
L1   Ir pi  r pi ¼ IR1  R1 ;  I C3   IC4 ¼ L2  2 2
dt C3 C4 dt

d 2 I L1 1 1 dIr pi 1 1
L1  2
  I C3 ¼  I C2 ;  r pi   IC4 ¼  I C1
dt C3 C2 dt C4 C1

KCL @ nodes A1 – A4: IR1 þ gm  Ir pi  r pi þ IL1 þ IC2 ¼ 0; IR1 ¼ IC1 þ


ICpi þ Ir pi

IC1 þ IL2 ¼ IC4 ; IC2 ¼ IC3 þ IL2 :

dIL1 R1 r pi d 2 IL dIR1 R1 dIr pi r pi


¼ IR1  þ Ir pi  ) 21 ¼  þ 
dt L1 L1 dt dt L1 dt L1

d 2 I L1 1 1 dIR R1 dIr pi r pi
¼  I C2 þ  I C3 ; 1  þ 
dt2 C2  L1 C3  L1 dt L1 dt L1
1 1
¼  I C2 þ  I C3
C2  L1 C3  L1

dIR1 dIr pi 1 1 dIr pi


 R1 þ  r pi ¼  I C2 þ  IC3 ;
dt dt C2 C3 dt
1 1
¼  I C1 þ  I C4
C1  r pi C4  r pi

dIR1 1 1 1 1
 R1 þ ½  I C1 þ  IC4   r pi ¼  I C2 þ  I C3
dt C1  r pi C4  r pi C2 C3

dIR1 1 1 1 1
¼  I C2 þ  IC3   I C1   IC4
dt C2  R1 C3  R1 C1  R1 C4  R1

d 2 IL2 1 1 dIL2 dY1 1 1


L2  ¼  I C3   I C4 ; ¼ Y1 ; ¼  I C3   I C4
dt2 C3 C4 dt dt C3  L2 C4  L2

We can summery our system differential equations (version 1):

dIR1 1 1 1 1 dIL
¼  I C2 þ  I C3   I C1   I C4 ; 1
dt C2  R1 C3  R1 C1  R1 C4  R1 dt
R1 r pi
¼ IR 1  þ Ir pi 
L1 L1
648 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

dIr pi 1 1 dIL2 dY1


¼  I C1 þ  I C4 ; ¼ Y1 ;
dt C1  r pi C4  r pi dt dt
1 1
¼  I C3   I C4
C3  L2 C4  L2

KCL @ nodes A1 – A 4: IC2 ¼ IR1  gm  Ir pi  r pi  IL1 ; IC1 ¼


IR1  ICpi  Ir pi

X
2
IC4 ¼ IR1  ICpi  Ir pi þ IL2 ; IC3 ¼ IR1  gm  Ir pi  r pi  I Lk :
k¼1

We can summery our system differential equations (version 2):

dIR1 1
¼  ½IR1  gm  Ir pi  r pi  IL1 
dt C 2  R1
1 X
2
þ  ½IR1  gm  Ir pi  r pi  ILk 
C3  R1 k¼1
1 1
  ½IR1  ICpi  Ir pi    ½IR1  ICpi  Ir pi þ IL 2 
C1  R1 C 4  R1

dIR1 1 1 1
¼  IR1   gm  Ir pi  r pi   IL
dt C2  R1 C2  R1 C2  R1 1
1 1
  IR1   gm  Ir pi  r pi
C3  R1 C3  R1
1 X 2
1 1 1
  ILk   IR1 þ  ICpi þ  Ir pi
C3  R1 k¼1 C1  R1 C1  R1 C1  R1
1 1 1 1
  IR1 þ  ICpi þ  Ir pi   IL
C4  R1 C4  R1 C4  R1 C4  R1 2
dIR1 1 1 1 1
¼  IR1   IR1   IR1   IR1
dt C2  R1 C1  R1 C3  R1 C4  R1
1 1 1 1
  gm  Ir pi  r pi   gm  Ir pi  r pi þ  Ir pi þ  Ir pi
C 2  R1 C3  R 1 C1  R 1 C4  R 1
1 1 1 1 1 X
2
þ  ICpi þ  ICpi   IL   IL   ILk
C1  R1 C4  R1 C2  R1 1 C4  R1 2 C3  R1 k¼1

dIR1 X 4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
¼ ½    IR 1 þ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   Ir pi þð Þ   ICpi
dt C R1
k¼1 k
C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R1 C R1
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X
3
1 1 X
4
1 1 dIL R1 r pi
½    IL  ½    IL ; 1 ¼ IR 1  þ Ir pi 
k¼2
Ck R1 1 C R1 2 dt
k¼3 k
L1 L1
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 649

dIr pi 1 1
¼  ½IR1  ICpi  Ir pi  þ  ½IR1  ICpi  Ir pi þ I L2 
dt C1  r pi C4  r pi

dIr pi X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
¼½   IR1  ½   ICpi  ½ 
dt C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1
 Ir pi þ  IL
C4  r pi 2

dIL2 dY1 1 X
2
1
¼ Y1 ; ¼  ½IR1  gm  Ir pi  r pi  ILk    ½IR1  ICpi  Ir pi þ IL2 
dt dt C 3  L2 k¼1
C 4  L2

dY1 1 1 1 1
¼  IR1   IR1   gm  Ir pi  r pi þ  Ir pi
dt C3  L2 C4  L2 C3  L2 C4  L2
1 1 1 1
  I L1   IL2   I L2 þ  ICpi
C3  L2 C3  L2 C4  L2 C4  L2

dY1 X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ ½    IR1 þ ½   gm  r pi   Ir pi   IL
dt C
k¼3 k
L 2 C4 C 3 L2 C3  L2 1
X4
1 1 1
½    I L2 þ  ICpi
C
k¼3 k
L2 C 4  L2

We can summery our system differential equations (version 2):

dIR1 X4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
¼ ½    IR 1 þ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   Ir pi þð Þ   ICpi
dt k¼1
C k R1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½    IL1  ½    IL
C R1
k¼2 k
C R1 2
k¼3 k

dIr pi X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
¼½   IR1  ½   ICpi  ½ 
dt C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1
 Ir pi þ  IL
C4  r pi 2

dY1 X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ ½    IR1 þ ½   gm  r pi   Ir pi   IL
dt C L2
k¼3 k
C4 C3 L2 C3  L2 1
X4
1 1 1
½    I L2 þ  ICpi
C L2
k¼3 k
C4  L2
650 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

dIL1 R1 r pi dIL2
¼ IR1  þ Ir pi  ; ¼ Y1
dt L1 L1 dt

At fixed points (equilibrium points):

dIR1 dIr pi dY1 dIL dIL


¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; 1 ¼ 0; 2 ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt dt
dIL2 dIL R1 r pi
¼ 0 ) Y1 ¼ 0; 1 ¼ 0 ) IR1  þ Ir pi  ¼0
dt dt L1 L1

dY1 X4
1 1  1 1 1 1
¼ 0 ) ½    IR1 þ ½   gm  r pi   Ir   I
dt k¼3
Ck L2 C 4 C3 L 2
pi
C3  L2 L1
X4
1 1  1
½    I L2 þ  IC pi ¼ 0
C
k¼3 k
L2 C 4  L2

dIr pi
¼0
dt
X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
)½   IR1  ½   IC pi  ½ 
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1
 Ir þ  I
pi
C4  r pi L2
¼0

dIR1 X4
1 1 X4
1 X 3
1 1
¼ 0 ) ½    IR1 þ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   Ir pi
dt k¼1
Ck R 1 k¼1
Ck k¼2
C k R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X4
1 1 X3
1 1 X 4
1 1
þð Þ   IC pi  ½    IL1  ½    IL2 ¼ 0
C
k¼1 k
R 1 C
k¼2 k
R1 C
k¼3 k
R1
k6¼2
k6¼3

We can summery our system fixed points equations (version 1):

r pi
Y1 ¼ 0; IR1  R1 þ Ir pi  r pi ¼ 0 ) IR1 ¼ Ir pi 
R1
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 651

X 4
1 1  1 1 1 1 X 4
1 1 
½    IR 1 þ ½   gm  r pi   Ir pi   IL1  ½    IL2
k¼3
Ck L 2 C 4 C3 L2 C3  L2 C
k¼3 k
L2
1
þ  I ¼ 0
C4  L2 Cpi

X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1 1
½   IR1  ½   IC pi  ½   Ir þ  I ¼ 0
k¼1
C k r pi k¼1
Ck r pi k¼1
C k r pi pi
C4  r pi L2
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3

X4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½    IR1 þ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   Ir pi þð Þ   IC pi
k¼1
C k R 1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
Ck R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½    IL1  ½    IL2 ¼ 0
C
k¼2 k
R 1 C
k¼3 k
R 1

We can summery our system fixed points equations (version 2):

X4
1 r pi 1 1 1 1
ðÞf½  þ½   gm  r pi  g  Ir   I
C R1  L2
k¼3 k
C4 C3 L2 pi
C3  L2 L1
X4
1 1  1
½    I L2 þ  IC pi ¼ 0
k¼3
Ck L2 C4  L2

X4
1 1 1 1 X4
1 1
ðÞ  ½ ð þ Þ  Ir þ  IL2  ½   IC pi ¼ 0
C
k¼1 k
R1 r pi pi
C4  r pi C
k¼1 k
r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X4
1 r pi X4
1 X 3
1 1 X4
1 1
ð  Þf½  þ½ ð Þ  gm  r pig   Ir pi þð Þ   IC pi
k¼1
C k R1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½    IL1  ½    IL2 ¼ 0
k¼2
C k R 1 k¼3
C k R 1

We can summery our system fixed points equations (version 3):

X4
1 X4
1 C4  r pi
ðÞIL2 ¼ ½   C4  IC pi þ ½ ð þ C4 Þ  Ir pi
C
k¼1 k
C
k¼1 k
R1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
652 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

ðÞ ! ðÞ
X 4
1 r pi 1 1 1 1
f½  þ½   gm  r pi  g  Ir   I
k¼3
C k R 1  L2 C4 C 3 L2
pi
C3  L2 L1
X4
1 1 X4
1 X4
1 C4  r pi
½    f½   C4  IC pi þ ½ ð þ C4 Þ  Ir pi g
C
k¼3 k
L2 C
k¼1 k
C
k¼1 k
R1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

1
þ  I ¼ 0
C4  L2 Cpi

X4
1 r pi 1 1 1 X 4
1 1 X 4
1 C4  r pi
f½  þ½   gm  r pi   ½  ½ ð þ C4 Þ  Ir pi g
k¼3
C k R 1  L 2 C 4 C3 L 2 k¼3
Ck L 2 k¼1
C k R1
k6¼2
k6¼3

1 1 X4
1 X4
1 1
  I þ f  ½ ½   C4 g   IC pi ¼ 0
C3  L2 L1 C4 C
k¼3 k
C
k¼1 k
L2
k6¼2
k6¼3

ðÞ ! ð  Þ
X4
1 r pi X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
f½  þ½ ð Þ  gm  r pig   Ir pi þð Þ   I
C
k¼1 k
R1 C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R1 C R1 Cpi
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X 3
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 X4
1 C4  r pi
½    IL1  ½    f½   C4  IC pi þ ½ ð þ C4 Þ  Ir pi g ¼0
k¼2
C k R1 k¼3
Ck R1 k¼1
Ck k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X4
1 r pi X4
1 X3
1 1
ff½  þ½ ð Þ  gm  r pig 
C
k¼1 k
R1 C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X4
1 1 X 4
1 C4  r pi
½  ½ ð þ C4 Þg  Ir pi
k¼3
Ck R1 k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X 4
1 X 3
1 1
þ fð Þ ½  ½   C4 g  IC pi  ½    IL1 ¼ 0
C R1
k¼1 k
C R1 k¼1 Ck
k¼3 k
C R1
k¼2 k
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

Remark: it is reader exercise to get the exact fixed points options in our case.
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the Colpitt’s oscillator circuit (BJT transistor small signal
model) consists in adding to coordinate ½Y1 ; Ir pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2  arbitrarily small
increments of exponentially form ½y1 ; ir pi ; iR1 ; iL1 ; iL2   ekt and retaining the first
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 653

order terms in Y1 ; Ir pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 . The system of homogenous equations leads to a
polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues [4]. The polynomial charac-
teristic equations accept by set of the below circuit variables, circuit variables
derivative and circuit variables second order derivative with respect to time into
Colpitt’s oscillator circuit [2, 3, 4]. Our Colpitt’s oscillator fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½y1 ; ir pi ; iR1 ; iL1 ; iL2   ekt are: j = 0
(first fixed point), j = 1(second fixed point), j = 2(third fixed point), etc.,

ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ


Ir pi ðtÞ ¼ Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt ; IR1 ðtÞ ¼ IR1 þ iR1  ekt ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt ; IL2 ðtÞ
ðjÞ kt
¼ I L2 þ i L2  e

ðjÞ dY1 ðtÞ dIr pi ðtÞ


Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; ¼ y1  k  ekt ; ¼ ir pi  k  ekt ; ICpi ðtÞ
dt dt
ðjÞ
¼ ICpi þ iCpi  ekt

dIR1 ðtÞ dIL ðtÞ dIL ðtÞ dIC ðtÞ


¼ iR1  k  ekt ; 1 ¼ iL1  k  ekt ; 2 ¼ iL2  k  ekt ; pi
dt dt dt dt
¼ iCpi  k  ekt

&&&

dIR1 X4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
¼½    IR 1 þ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   Ir pi þð Þ   ICpi
dt k¼1
C k R 1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
Ck R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½    IL 1  ½    IL2
k¼2
C k R 1 k¼3
C k R 1

X4
1 1 ðjÞ
iR1  k  ekt ¼  ½    ½IR1 þ iR1  ekt 
C R1
k¼1 k
X4
1 X3
1 1 ðjÞ
þ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   ½Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt 
k¼1
Ck k¼2
Ck R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X3
1 1 ðjÞ
þð Þ   ½ICpi þ iCpi  ekt   ½    ½IL1 þ iL1  ekt 
k¼1
Ck R 1 k¼2
Ck R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X4
1 1 ðjÞ
½    ½IL2 þ iL2  ekt 
k¼3
Ck R1
654 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

X4
1 1 ðjÞ X 4
1 X3
1 1 ðjÞ
iR1  k  ekt ¼ f½    IR 1 þ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   Ir pi
k¼1
C k R 1 k¼1
Ck k¼2
Ck R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X4
1 1 ðjÞ X 3
1 1 ðjÞ X 4
1 1 ðjÞ
þð Þ   ICpi  ½    IL 1  ½    IL 2 g
C
k¼1 k
R 1 C
k¼2 k
R 1 C
k¼3 k
R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X4
1 1 X4
1 X 3
1 1
½    iR1  ekt þ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   ir pi  ekt
k¼1
C k R 1 k¼1
Ck k¼2
Ck R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X4
1 1 X 3
1 1 X 4
1 1
þð Þ   iCpi  ekt  ½    iL1  ekt  ½    iL2  ekt
C R1
k¼1 k
C R1
k¼2 k
C R1
k¼3 k
k6¼2
k6¼3

At fixed points:

X 4
1 1 ðjÞ X 4
1 X 3
1 1 ðjÞ X4
1 1 ðjÞ
½    IR1 þ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   Ir pi þ ð Þ   ICpi
C
k¼1 k
R 1 C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R 1 C
k¼1 k
R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X 3
1 1 ðjÞ X 4
1 1 ðjÞ
½    IL 1  ½    IL 2 ¼ 0
k¼2
Ck R 1 k¼3
C k R 1

X4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
 i R1  k  ½    i R1 þ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   ir pi þð Þ   iCpi
k¼1
Ck R 1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½    iL 1  ½    iL2 ¼ 0
k¼2
Ck R 1 k¼3
C k R 1

dIr pi X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
¼½   IR1  ½   ICpi  ½ 
dt k¼1
C k r pi k¼1
Ck r pi k¼1
C k r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1
 Ir pi þ  IL
C4  r pi 2
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 655

X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
ir pi  k  ekt ¼ ½   ½IR1 þ iR1  ekt   ½   ½ICpi þ iCpi  ekt 
k¼1
Ck r pi k¼1
C k r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½   ½Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt  þ  ½I þ iL2  ekt 
C
k¼1 k
r pi C4  r pi L2
k6¼2
k6¼3

X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
ir pi  k  ekt ¼ ½   IR 1  ½   ICpi  ½   Ir pi
k¼1
C k r pi k¼1
C k r pi k¼1
C k r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3

1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1
þ  IL2 þ ½   iR  ekt
C4  r pi k¼1
C k r pi 1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X4
1 1 X4
1 1 1
½   iCpi  ekt  ½   ir pi  ekt þ  iL  ekt
k¼1
C k r pi k¼1
Ck r pi C4  r pi 2
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

At fixed points:

X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½   IR1  ½   ICpi  ½   Ir pi þ I ¼0
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C4  r pi L2
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3

X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
 ir pi  kþ½   iR1  ½   iCpi  ½   ir pi
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3

1
þ  iL ¼ 0
C4  r pi 2

dY1 X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ ½    IR1 þ ½   gm  r pi   Ir pi   IL
dt C
k¼3 k
L 2 C4 C 3 L2 C3  L2 1
X4
1 1 1
½    I L2 þ  ICpi
C L2
k¼3 k
C4  L2
656 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 1 ðjÞ
y1  k  ekt ¼ ½    ½IR1 þ iR1  ekt  þ ½   gm  r pi   ½Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt 
C L2
k¼3 k
C4 C3 L2
1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
  ½IL1 þ iL1  ekt   ½    ½IL2 þ iL2  ekt 
C3  L2 k¼3
C k L 2

1 ðjÞ
þ  ½I þ iCpi  ekt 
C4  L2 Cpi

X4
1 1 ðjÞ X4
1 1 1 1 1 ðjÞ
y1  k  ekt ¼ ½    IR1  ½    iR1  ekt þ ½   gm  r pi   Ir pi
k¼3
C k L 2 k¼3
C k L 2 C 4 C 3 L 2

1 1 1 1 ðjÞ 1 X4
1 1 ðjÞ
þ½   gm  r pi   ir pi  ekt  I   iL  ekt  ½  I
C4 C3 L2 C3  L2 L1 C3  L2 1 C L2 L2
k¼3 k
X4
1 1 1 ðjÞ 1
½    iL2  ekt þ  ICpi þ  iCpi  ekt
k¼3
C k L 2 C 4  L2 C 4  L2

X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
y1  k  ekt ¼ f½    IR 1 þ ½   gm  r pi   Ir pi   IL 1
k¼3
Ck L2 C 4 C3 L2 C3  L2

X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1
½    IL2 þ  ICpi g  ½    iR1  ekt
k¼3
Ck L2 C4  L2 k¼3
C k L2
1 1 1
þ½   gm  r pi   ir pi  ekt
C4 C3 L2
1 X 4
1 1 1
  iL1  ekt  ½    iL2  ekt þ  iCpi  ekt
C3  L2 k¼3
C k L 2 C 4  L 2

At fixed points:

X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½    IR1 þ ½   gm  r pi   Ir pi   I L1
k¼3
C k L2 C4 C3 L2 C3  L2

X 4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½    I L2 þ  ICpi ¼ 0
k¼3
C k L 2 C 4  L2

X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
 y1  k  ½    iR1 þ ½   gm  r pi   ir pi   iL
C
k¼3 k
L2 C 4 C3 L2 C3  L2 1
X4
1 1 1
½    i L2 þ  iCpi ¼ 0
C L2
k¼3 k
C4  L2
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 657

dIL1 R1 r pi ðjÞ R1
¼ IR1  þ Ir pi ; iL1  k  ekt ¼ ½IR1 þ iR1  ekt  

dt L1 L1 L1
ðjÞ r pi ðjÞ R ðjÞ r pi R1
þ ½Ir pi þ ir pi  ekt   iL1  k  ekt ¼ IR1  þ iR1   ekt
1
þ Ir pi 
L1 L1 L1 L1
r pi kt
þ ir pi  e
L1

At fixed points:

ðjÞ R1 ðjÞ r pi R1 r pi
IR1  þ Ir pi  ¼ 0; iL1  k þ iR1  þ ir pi  ¼0
L1 L1 L1 L1
dIL2 ðjÞ ðjÞ
dt ¼ Y1 ; iL2  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt . At fixed points: Y1 ¼ 0; iL2  k þ y1 ¼ 0
We can summery our Colpitt’s oscillator circuit arbitrarily small increments
equations:

X4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
 i R1  k  ½    i R1 þ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi   ir pi þð Þ   iCpi
k¼1
Ck R 1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½    iL 1  ½    iL2 ¼ 0
k¼2
Ck R 1 k¼3
C k R 1

X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
 ir pi  kþ½   iR1  ½   iCpi  ½   ir pi
C
k¼1 k
r pi C
k¼1 k
r pi C
k¼1 k
r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3

1
þ  iL ¼ 0
C4  r pi 2

X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
 y1  k  ½    iR1 þ ½   gm  r pi   ir pi   iL
k¼3
Ck L2 C 4 C3 L2 C3  L2 1
X4
1 1 1
½    iL2 þ  iCpi ¼ 0
C
k¼3 k
L2 C 4  L2

R1 r pi
iL1  k þ iR1  þ ir pi  ¼ 0; iL2  k þ y1 ¼ 0
L1 L1
658 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

0 1
P
4
½ð 1
B k¼1 Ck R1 C Þ  1

B k6¼2 C
0 1 B
B k6¼3
C
C
0 1 iR B C
B
1
B
C B f½ P 4 C
N11 ... N15 B r pi C B
i 1

Ck C
C
B . .. .. C B C B k¼1 C  
B . C B C
. A  B y1 C þ B C  iCpi ¼ 0;
¼
@ . .
k6 2

C B C
k6¼3
B B C
N51  N55 @ i L1 A B  r 1pig C
B C
i L2 B 1 C
B C4 L2 C
B C
@ 0 A
0
0 1
0 1 iR1
N11 ... N15 B C
B ir pi C
B . .. C
.. C B B C
B . C
@ . . . A  B y1 C  0
B C
N51  N55 @ i L1 A
i L2
0 1
P
4
B ½ð Ck Þ
 R1  C
1 1
B k¼1 C
B k6k6¼¼32 C
B C
B P C
B 4
C
B f½ Ck 
1
C   P
B C 4
Assumption: B k¼1
C  iCpi ! e; N11 ¼ k  ½ C1k   R11
B k6¼2
k6¼3 C
B C k¼1
B  r 1pig C
B C
B 1 C
B C4 L2 C
@ 0 A
0

X4
1 X3
1 1
N12 ¼ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi  ; N13 ¼ 0;
C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X3
1 1 X4
1 1
N14 ¼ ½   ; N15 ¼ ½ 
k¼2
Ck R1 k¼3
Ck R 1

X4
1 1 X4
1 1
N21 ¼ ½  ; N22 ¼ k  ½  ;
C
k¼1 k
r pi C
k¼1 k
r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

1
N23 ¼ 0; N24 ¼ 0; N25 ¼
C4  r pi
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 659

X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
N31 ¼ ½   ; N32 ¼ ½   gm  r pi  ; N33 ¼ k; N34 ¼ 
k¼3
Ck L2 C 4 C3 L2 C3  L2

X4
1 1 R1 r pi
N35 ¼ ½   ; N41 ¼ ; N42 ¼ ; N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k; N45 ¼ 0
k¼3
Ck L2 L 1 L1

N51 ¼ N52 ¼ 0; N53 ¼ 1; N54 ¼ 0; N55 ¼ k


0 1 0 1
N11 . . . N15 N11 ... N15
B . .. .. C B .. .. .. C
ðA  k  IÞ ¼ @ .. . . A ; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ det @ . . . A
N51    N55 N51  N55

If an eigenvalue of A is on the imaginary axis, then the method of the center


manifold must be applied. To apply the stability criterion of Liapunov to our
system, the equation detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 has a zero in the left half plane, without
calculating the eigenvalues explicitly. We define new system parameters functions:

X4
1 1
n1 ¼ n1 ðC k
; R1 Þ ¼ ½   ; n1 ¼ n2 ðC k
;
C
k¼1 k
R 1
½k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4 ½k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4
X4
1 X 3
1 1
R1 ; r pi; gm Þ ¼ ½ ð Þ  gm  r pi 
C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X3
1 1 X4
1 1
n3 ¼ n3 ðC2 ; C3 ; R1 Þ ¼ ½   ; n4 ¼ n4 ðC3 ; C4 ; R1 Þ ¼ ½ 
k¼2
C k R 1 k¼3
Ck R 1

X4
1 1 X4
1 1
n5 ¼ n5 ðC1 ; C4 ; r piÞ ¼ ½  ; n6 ¼ n6 ðC1 ; C4 ; r piÞ ¼ ½ 
C
k¼1 k
r pi C
k¼1 k
r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3

1 X4
1 1
n7 ¼ n7 ðC4 ; r piÞ ¼ ; n8 ¼ n8 ðC3 ; C4 ; L2 Þ ¼ ½ 
C4  r pi C L2
k¼3 k

1 1 1 1
n9 ¼ n9 ðC3 ; C4 ; r pi; L2 Þ ¼ ½   gm  r pi  ; n10 ¼ n10 ðC3 ; L2 Þ ¼ 
C4 C3 L2 C3  L2

X4
1 1 R1
n11 ¼ n11 ðC3 ; C4 ; L2 Þ ¼ ½   ; n12 ¼ n12 ðR1 ; L1 Þ ¼ ;
k¼3
Ck L 2 L1
r pi
n13 ¼ n13 ðr pi; L1 Þ ¼
L1
660 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

detðA  k  IÞ ¼ k  n1  fk4  k3  n6  k2  n11 þ k  ½n11  n6  n7  n9   n7  n10  n13 g


 n2  fk3  n5  k  ½n11  n5 þ n7  n8   n7  n10  n12 g  n3
 fk3  n12 þ k2  ½n6  n12  n5  n13  þ k  n11  n12 þ ½n11  n13  n5  n11
 n6  n12  n7  n8  n13 þ n7  n9  n12 g þ n4  fk2  n8 þ k  ½n5  n9
þ n10  n12  n6  n8  þ ½n10  n13  n5  n6  n10  n12 g

detðA  k  IÞ ¼ n1  k5 þ k4  n6  n1 þ k3  n1  n11  k2  n1  ½n11  n6  n7  n9 


þ k  n1  n7  n10  n13 þ k3  n2  n5 þ k  n2  ½n11  n5 þ n7  n8 
þ n2  n7  n10  n12 þ k3  n3  n12  k2  n3  ½n6  n12  n5  n13 
 k  n11  n3  n12  n3  ½n11  n13  n5  n11  n6  n12  n7  n8  n13 þ n7  n9  n12 
þ k2  n4  n8 þ k  n4  ½n5  n9 þ n10  n12  n6  n8 
þ n4  ½n10  n13  n5  n6  n10  n12 

detðA  k  IÞ ¼ n1  k5 þ k4  n6  n1 þ k3  ½n1  n11 þ n2  n5 þ n3  n12 


þ k2 fn4  n8  n1  ½n11  n6  n7  n9   n3  ½n6  n12  n5  n13 g
þ k  fn1  n7  n10  n13 þ k  n2  ½n11  n5 þ n7  n8 
 n11  n3  n12 þ n4  ½n5  n9 þ n10  n12  n6  n8 g
þ n2  n7  n10  n12  n3  ½n11  n13  n5  n11  n6  n12
 n7  n8  n13 þ n7  n9  n12 
þ n4  ½n10  n13  n5  n6  n10  n12 

We define new global parameters: !5 ¼ n1 ; !4 ¼ n6  n1 ; !3 ¼ n1  n11 þ n2 


n5 þ n3  n12

!2 ¼ n4  n8  n1  ½n11  n6  n7  n9   n3  ½n6  n12  n5  n13 

!1 ¼ n1  n7  n10  n13 þ k  n2  ½n11  n5 þ n7  n8   n11  n3  n12 þ n4


 ½n5  n9 þ n10  n12  n6  n8 

!0 ¼ n2  n7  n10  n12  n3  ½n11  n13  n5  n11  n6  n12  n7  n8  n13 þ n7  n9  n12 


þ n4  ½n10  n13  n5  n6  n10  n12 

P
5 P
5
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ !k  kk ¼ 0. Next is to find zeros of !k  kk ¼ 0 and
k¼0 k¼0
establish stability according to criterion of Liapunov [2, 3, 4].
Exercises 661

Exercises

1. We have resonator circuit hð0\h\1Þ degree phase shift. The output of the
amplifier is taken through a phase shift network to provide it an additional
phase shift of hð0\h\1Þ degree. Amplifier provides a phase shift of 180°
and the phase shift network also gives a θ°. Therefore total phases shift of
(180 + θ) degree (it is a 60° phase shift per RC section). The phase shift
network is constructed from n RC sections (n [ 3; n 2 N).

Phase shift resonant circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small
Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. Consider in your analysis “AC ground” in
the Small Signal (SS) circuit.
1:1 Find resonator circuit differential equations.
1:2 Find resonator circuit fixed points.
1:3 Discuss stability of resonator circuit hð0\h\1Þ degree phase shift by
using Liapunov theory. How the stability is dependent on the number
(n) of RC sections?
1:4 Discuss the circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the
position of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of eigen-
values in the Re/Im plane is changed for different numbers (n) of RC
sections?
1:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit for different number (n) of
RC sections.
662 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

2. We have resonator circuit uð0\u\1Þ degree phase shift. The output of the
amplifier is taken through two phase shift networks in cascade (series). There is
intermediate RF choke (L) between the first and the second RC networks. The
phase shift of the first network is u1 ð0\u1 \1Þ degree and the phase shift of
P2
the second network is u2 ð0\u2 \1Þ degree u¼ uk ; 0\u\1. In the first
k¼1
RC network the number of RC sections is n. In the second RC network the
number of RC sections is m (n 6¼ m; n; m [ 3; n; m 2 N).

Phase shift resonator circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small
Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. Consider in your analysis “AC signal” in
the small signal circuit model.
2:1 Find resonator circuit differential equations.
2:2 Find resonator circuit fixed points.
2:3 Discuss stability of resonator circuit uð0\u\1Þ phase shift by using
Liapunov theory. How the stability is dependent on the number (n) of RC
Exercises 663

sections in the first network? and the number (m) of RC sections in the
second network? How the stability of resonator circuit is dependent on the
value of intermediate RF choke (L)?
2:4 Discuss the circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the
position of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of eigen-
values in the Re/Im plane is changed for different number of RC sections
in the first network (n) and second network (m)?
2:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit for different number of RC
sections in the first network (n) and second network (m).
3. We have parallel resonator crystal oscillator circuit (BJT crystal oscillator). The
BJT’s collector is connected to RFC (Radio Frequency Coil) L1. Additionally
we have XTAL which is connected to circuit’s output. The circuit contains
biasing resistors R1 and R2 and additional elements (CB, RE, C1, C2). Our
circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small Signal
(SS) equivalent model. Consider in your analysis “AC ground” in the Small
Signal (SS) circuit.

Hint: Replace the circuit’s crystal by equivalent circuit (resonator circuit).


3:1 Find parallel resonator crystal oscillator circuit differential equations.
3:2 Find parallel resonator crystal oscillator circuit fixed points.
3:3 Discuss stability of parallel resonator crystal oscillator circuit by using
Liapunov theorem. How the stability is changed if capacitor Cb is dis-
connected? How the stability is changed if we disconnect resistor Re?
664 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

3:4 Discuss circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the position


of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of eigenvalues in the
Re/Im plane changed if we connect two parallel crystals (XTAL1 and
XTAL2) to our circuit’s output? Consider that two parallel crystals
(XTAL1 and XTAL2) are not same.
3:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit for two cases. First case:
resistor R2 is disconnected and Second case: capacitor C2 is disconnected.
4. We have BJT based Hartley oscillator circuit. The circuit is constructed from
sub Tank circuit and peripheral components. The sub tank circuit is constructed
from capacitor C and primary transformer (T1) inductances (L1 and L2), total
P
Lp ¼ 2i¼1 Li . The secondary transformer (T1) inductance is Ls (Lp ≠ Ls).
Additionally there are L3 (RFC = Radio Frequency Coil), BJT transistor bias
resistors R1 and R2, Q1 transistor emitter resistor (Re) and capacitor (Ce),
feedback capacitor (Cc).

Transformer T1: vp—transformer primary voltage, vs—transformer secondary


voltage. ϕ is the flux through a one turn coil located anywhere on the transformer
core. np and ns are the number of turns of the coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary),
respectively, then the total flux ϕp and ϕs through coils 1 and 2 respectively are
d/ P2
/p ¼ np  /; /s ¼ ns  /; vp ¼ dtp ; vs ¼ d/dt ; vp ¼ np  dt ; Lp ¼
s d/
i¼1 Li
Exercises 665

v ðtÞ np np v ðtÞ np
vs ¼ ns  d/
dt ; vp ðtÞ ¼ vp ; vs ðtÞ ¼ vs ; vs ðtÞ ¼
p
ns ;a ¼ ns . vps ðtÞ ¼ ns for all times t and
n
for all voltages vp and vs . We define the ratio between np and ns as “a” ða ¼ nps Þ.
Step down transformer a > 1 and step up transformer a < 1. By law of con-
servation of energy, apparent real and reactive powers are each conserved in the
input and output ðS ¼ Ip  vp ¼ Is  vs ; vp ¼ VL1 þ VL2 Þ.
Remark: Coil 1 (primary) is constructed from two coils (L1 and L2 in series).
Hartley oscillator circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small
Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. Consider in your analysis “AC signal” in
the small signal circuit model.
4:1 Find Hartley oscillator circuit differential equations.
4:2 Find Hartley oscillator circuit fixed points.
4:3 Discuss stability of Hartley oscillator circuit by using Liapunov theorem.
How the stability is dependent on the number of turns of the coil 1
(primary) and 2 (secondary) of T1 transformer?
4:4 Discuss the circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the
position of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of the
eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane is changed if we short resistor Re? And if
we disconnect capacitor Ce?
4:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit if we multiple the capac-
itance C by factor Γ (C ! C  C; C 2 R þ ). How the circuit stability is
dependent on Γ parameter?
5. We have transistor Colpitts oscillator circuit. The circuit is constructed from
sub tank circuit and peripheral components. The sub tank circuit is constructed
from two capacitors C1 and C2, primary transformer (T1)—inductance L
(Lp = L). The secondary transformer (T1) inductance is Ls (Lp ≠ Ls).
Additionally there are L1 (RFC = Radio Frequency Coil), BJT transistor bias
resistors R1 and R2, Q1 transistor emitter resistor (Re) and capacitor (Ce),
feedback capacitor (Cc). Colpitts oscillator circuit stability analysis is done by
considering BJT Small Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. Consider in your
analysis “AC signal” in the small signal circuit model. Transformer T1: vp—
transformer primary voltage, vs—transformer secondary voltage. ϕ is the flux
through a one turn coil located anywhere on the transformer core. np and ns are
the number of turns of the coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary), respectively, then
the total flux ϕp and ϕs through coils 1 and 2 respectively are /p ¼ np  /; /s ¼
d/p d/s vp ðtÞ
ns  /; vp ¼ dt ; vs ¼ dt ; vp ¼ np  dt vs ¼ ns  dt ; vp ðtÞ ¼ vp ; vs ðtÞ ¼ vs ; vs ðtÞ ¼
d/ d/

np n v ðtÞ n
ns ;a ¼ nps . vps ðtÞ ¼ nps for all times t and for all voltages vp and vs . We define the
n
ratio between np and ns as “a” (a ¼ nps ). Step down transformer a > 1 and step
up transformer a < 1. By law of conservation of energy, apparent real and
reactive powers are each conserved in the input and output
(S ¼ Ip  vp ¼ Is  vs ).
666 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

5:1 Find Colpitts oscillator circuit differential equations.


5:2 Find Colpitts oscillator circuit fixed points.
5:3 Discuss stability of Colpitts oscillator circuit by using Liapunov theorem.
How the stability is dependent on the number of turns of the coil 1
(primary) and 2 (secondary) of T1 transformer?
5:4 Discuss the circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the
position of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of the
eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane is changed if we disconnect resistor Re?
And if we disconnect capacitor Ce?
5:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit if we multiple the capac-
itance Cc by factor Γ (Cc ! C  Cc ; C 2 R þ ). How the circuit stability is
dependent on Γ parameter?
6. We have Colpitts crystal oscillator circuit. The crystal oscillator (XTAL) is
designed around a CC (Common Collector), emitter-follower amplifier. The R1
and R2 resistor network sets the DC bias level on the base while emitter resistor
Re sets the output voltage level. Resistor R2 is set as large as possible to prevent
loading to the parallel connected crystal. The type of transistor is NPN con-
nected in a common collector configuration and is capable of operating at high
switching speeds. Capacitors C1 and C2 shunt the output of the transistor which
Exercises 667

reduces the feedback signal. Therefore, the gain of the transistor limits the
maximum value of C1 and C2. The output amplitude should be kept low in
order to avoid excessive power dissipation in the crystal.

Our circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small Signal


(SS) equivalent model. Consider in your analysis “AC ground” in the Small
Signal (SS) circuit. Hint: Replace the circuit’s crystal by equivalent circuit
(resonator circuit).
6:1 Find Colpitts crystal oscillator circuit differential equations.
6:2 Find Colpitts crystal oscillator circuit fixed points.
6:3 Discuss stability of Colpitts crystal oscillator circuit by using Liapunov
theorem. How the stability is dependent on values of capacitors C1, C2,
and C3?
6:4 Discuss the circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the
position of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of the
eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane is changed if we short resistor Re? And if
we disconnect capacitor C3?
6:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit if we multiple the capac-
itance C1 by factor Γ (C1 ! C  C1 ; C 2 R þ ). How the circuit stability is
dependent on Γ parameter?
7. The Colpitts oscillator, like Hartley is capable of giving an excellent sine wave
shape, and also has the advantage of better stability at very high frequencies. It
can be recognized by always having a “tapped capacitor”. The circuit is a
buffered Colpitts oscillator which is a common solution to feed the oscillator
668 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

output into an emitter follower buffer amplifier. The oscillator section of this
circuit is a slightly different version of typical Colpitts oscillator. The RF choke
(L1) is the load impedance for Q1 and the tank circuit is isolated from Q1 by two
DC blocking capacitors, C1 and C4. The Colpitts oscillator circuit uses a tuned
feedback path rather than a tuned amplifier. The emitter follower stage (R4, Q2
and R5) has very high input impedance, thus having little loading effect on the
oscillator, and very low output impedance allowing it to drive loads of only a
few tens of ohms impedance. The frequency stability of oscillators can be
affected by variations in supply voltage.
Our circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small Signal
(SS) equivalent model for Q1 and Q2. Consider in your analysis “AC ground”
in the Small Signal (SS) circuit.

7:1 Find buffered Colpitts oscillator circuit differential equations


7:2 Find buffered Colpitts oscillator circuit fixed points.
7:3 Discuss stability of buffered Colpitts oscillator circuit by using Liapunov
theorem. How the stability is dependent on values of capacitors C6, C2,
and C3?
7:4 Discuss the circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the
position of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of the
eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane is changed if we short resistor R3? And if
we disconnect capacitor C5?
Exercises 669

7:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit if we multiple the capac-
itance C2 by factor Γ (C2 ! C  C2 ; C 2 R þ ). How the circuit stability is
dependent on Γ parameter?
8. We have Colpitts double crystals oscillator circuit. The crystals oscillator
(XTAL1 and XTAL2) is designed around a CC (Common Collector),
emitter-follower amplifier. The R1 resistor sets the DC bias level on the base
while emitter resistor Re sets the output voltage level. The type of transistor is
NPN connected in a common collector configuration and is capable of oper-
ating at high switching speeds. Capacitor C1 can be tune in his value.

Our circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small Signal


(SS) equivalent model. Consider in your analysis “AC ground” in the Small
Signal (SS) circuit. Hint: Replace the circuit’s crystal by equivalent circuit
(resonator circuit).
8:1 Find Colpitts double crystals oscillator circuit differential equations.
8:2 Find Colpitts double crystals circuit fixed points.
8:3 Discuss stability of Colpitts double crystals circuit by using Liapunov
theorem. How the stability is dependent on values of capacitors C1, Re?
8:4 Discuss the circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the
position of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of the
eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane is changed if we disconnect resistor Re?
And if we disconnect capacitor C3?
8:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit if capacitance C1 transform
according to the function C1 ! C1 ¼ nðC1 ; CÞ
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
(nðC1 ; CÞ ¼ C1  C þ C1  C3 ; C 2 R þ ). How the circuit stability is
dependent on Γ parameter?
670 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

9. We have voltage controlled RF oscillator (VCO) circuit. The VCO circuit may
be considered as an amplifier and a feedback loop. For the circuit to oscillate
the total phase shift around the loop must be 360° and the gain must be unity.
VCO circuit uses a common emitter circuit. This is itself produces a phase shift
of 180°, leaving the feedback network to provide a further 180°. VCO circuit
which uses a common base circuit where there is no phase shift between the
emitter and collector signals (using bipolar transistor) and the phase shift net-
work must provide either 0° or 360°. The system includes a resonator circuit to
ensure that the oscillation occurs on a given frequency. The resonator circuit
can be an LC resonator circuit in either series or parallel resonance depending
upon the circuit, or a quartz crystal. Resistors Rb1 and Rb2 are Q1’s transistor
biasing elements.

One of the options for VCO active device is bipolar transistor. The bipolar transistor has a
low input impedance and is current driven. To make a VCO, the oscillator needs to be tuned
by a voltage. This is done by variable capacitor from varactor diodes. The tune voltage for
the VCO can then be applied to the varactors. The control line from the phase detector is
isolated from the varactor diodes using a resistor R1. Inductor L1 is the RF choke (RFC).
The series capacitor C3 is used to block the DC from the inductor otherwise it would
provide a direct short to ground and upset the bias arrangements of the circuit. The value of
C3 is normally large in comparison with C1 and C2 and can be ignored from the resonance
perspective. If we use a varactor diodes within a voltage controlled oscillator, care must be
taken in the design of the circuit to ensure that the drive level in the tuned circuit is not too
high. In that case the varactor diodes may be driven into forward conduction, reducing the
Q and increasing the level of spurious signals.

Varactor diodes: In your stability analysis use the simple model of a packaged
varactor diode. A varactor diode is a P-N diode that changes its capacitance and
the series resistance as the bias applied to the diode is varied. The property of
Exercises 671

capacitance change is utilized to achieve a change in the frequency and/or the


phase of an electrical circuit. In the simple model of a packaged varactor diode
Cj(V) is the variable junction capacitance of the diode die, Rs(V) is the variable
series resistance of the diode die, and Cp is the fixed parasitic capacitance
arising from the installation of the die in a package. Package parasitic induc-
tance Lp. The contribution to the series resistance from the packaging is very
small and may be ignored. Similarly, the inductance associated with the die
itself is very small and may be ignored. Variation of the junction capacitance
and the junction series resistance as a function of applied reverse voltage is
reported in the individual varactor data sheets. D1 and D2 are varactor diodes,
consider that they identical for circuit analysis.
Our circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small Signal
(SS) equivalent model. Consider in your analysis “AC ground” in the Small
Signal (SS) circuit.
9:1 Find voltage controlled RF oscillator (VCO) circuit differential equations.
9:2 Find voltage controlled RF oscillator (VCO) circuit fixed points.
9:3 Discuss stability of voltage controlled RF oscillator (VCO) circuit by
using Liapunov theorem. How the stability is dependent on values of
capacitors Cc, Re?
9:4 We disconnect resistor Rb2, How the stability and dynamics of our circuit
is changed?
9:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit if capacitance C1 and C2
transform according to the functions C1 ! C1 ¼ n1 ðC1 ; CÞ

pffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi3
C2 ! C2 ¼ n2 ðC2 ; XÞ; ðn1 ðC1 ; CÞ ¼ C1  C þ C1  C ; C 2 R þ Þ:
pffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ðn2 ðC2 ; XÞ ¼ C2  X3 þ C2  X ; X 2 R þ Þ. How the circuit stability is
dependent on Γ and Ω parameters?
10. We have Common Base (CB) bipolar colpitts oscillator with varactor diode.
Common Base (CB) amplifier, input signal is inserted at emitter (E) and output
signal taken from the collector (C). The CB amplifier can operate as a voltage
amplifier for low input impedance circuits. The transistor is matched to the
load. One capacitor of the divider circuit is the varactor, whose voltage can be
changed by applying a tuning voltage through RF choke (L3) and a bypass
conductor. Note that the capacitance variation with voltage is nonlinear, with
the capacitance changing more at low values of bias voltage than at high values.
The typical capacitance variation of a varactor diode (D1) is as a function of the
reverse bias voltage. This leads to a nonlinear frequency versus voltage tuning
curve for the oscillator. If linearity is required, a compensation network must be
used to modify the tuning voltage before it is applied to varactor. Resistors
R1… R4 are circuit biasing elements. Output matching network can be Pi or T
type. Varactor diodes: In your stability analysis use the simple model of a
672 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis

packaged varactor diode. A varactor diode is a P-N diode that changes its
capacitance and the series resistance as the bias applied to the diode is varied.

Our circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small Signal


(SS) equivalent model. Consider in your analysis “AC ground” in the Small
Signal (SS) circuit.
10:1 Find voltage Common Base (CB) bipolar colpitts oscillator circuit dif-
ferential equations for Pi and T matching networks.
10:2 Find Common Base (CB) bipolar colpitts oscillator circuit fixed points
for Pi and T matching networks.
10:3 Discuss stability of Common Base (CB) bipolar colpitts circuit by using
Liapunov theorem. How the stability is dependent on values of capaci-
tors C2, R4?
10:4 We disconnect capacitor C1, How the stability and dynamics of our
circuit is changed?
10:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit if capacitance C1 and C2
transform according to the functions C1 ! C1 ¼ n1 ðC1 ; CÞ C2 ! C2 ¼
pffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
n2 ðC2 ; XÞ; (n1 ðC1 ; CÞ ¼ C1  C þ C1  C3 ; C 2 R þ ). (n2 ðC2 ; XÞ ¼
pffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffi
C2  X3 þ C2  X; X 2 R þ ). How the circuit stability Is dependent
on Γ and Ω parameters?
Chapter 7
Filters Systems Stability Analysis

The target of analog and RF filtering is to modify the magnitude and phase of signal
frequency components. Many analog or radio frequency (RF) circuits perform fil-
tering on the signals passing through them. The analog and RF filters types are
defined on the criteria how they modify the magnitude and/or phase of sinusoidal
frequency components. The primary issue is magnitude response. In other cases
filters concerned with phase modifications. Filters are typically classified based on
how they modify the frequency spectrum. The four basic types of filters are; the low
pass filter, High pass filter, bandpass filter and band stop filter. Microwave and RF
filters pass a range of frequencies and reject other frequencies. Filters are widely
used at the input of a microwave receiver. The RF and microwave system’s fre-
quencies are picked up by the receiving antenna system and enter the radio receiver.
The first target of the filter is to pass only those frequencies in the assigned oper-
ation range. The second target of the filter is to reject all other frequencies.
Important graphs when analyzing the functionality of filter is the attenuation of a
microwave signal passing through the filter as a function of frequency. Good filters
have a large out of band attenuation and a low in band insertion loss. The selectivity
feature defines the frequency range over which the filter characteristics change from
passing the signal to blocking it. A Diplexer is a three port network that splits the
incoming signal on one end and directs it through two outputs to different lines,
dependent on frequency. A diplexer is the simplest form of a multiplexer, which can
split the signals from one common port into many different paths. Quartz crystals
are widely used In many filters applications. Quartz crystals have piezo electric
properties; they develop an electric potential upon the application of mechanical
stress. One of the most common piezoelectric uses of quartz is as a crystal oscil-
lator. The resonant frequency of a quartz crystal oscillator is changed by
mechanically loading it. A quartz crystal has two resonant frequencies, a series
resonant frequency and a parallel resonant frequency. A quartz crystal operating on
its parallel resonant frequency behaves like a parallel LC circuit. It has high
impedance at one frequency and other frequency only. The practical advantage of
quartz crystal is that it has an extremely high Q and result of an excellent high
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 673
O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_7
674 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

selectivity filter. The crystal lattice filter can be a band pass filter, suitable for use as
a sideband filter in an SSB transmitter receiver or transmitter. The two resonant
frequencies of a quartz crystal are important when designing many RF systems.
A tunable third order bandpass filter using varactors is commonly used in many RF
applications. A tunable filter has greater functionality, better channel selectivity,
reduced size, and lower weight since the same hardware can be employed at
multiple bands. Practically tunable frequency filters are used as tracking filters for
multi band telecommunication systems, wideband radar systems and radiometers.
Tracking filters are mechanically tuned by adjusting the cavity dimensions of the
resonators or magnetically altering the resonant frequency. The tuning element is a
reverse-biased varactor diode [26, 33, 34, 42].

7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability


Analysis

The terminology duplexers and diplexers are very important for wireless commu-
nication. Duplexer is when two band pass filters are duplexed, meaning one
common input, and two outputs (reverse is also correct, two inputs and one output).
Duplexer will duplex a receiving and transmitting signal using two band pass filter,
one common input (or output), and two outputs (or inputs), and is a three port
device. A diplexer will refer to a duplexed high pass and low pass where broad
bands transmit and receive is necessary, it is also a three port device with a common
input and two outputs. A diplexer is a passive device that implements frequency
domain multiplexing. Two ports (e.g., L and H) are multiplexed onto a third port
(e.g., S). The signals on ports L and H occupy disjoint frequency bands.
Consequently, the signals on L and H can coexist on port S without interfering with
each other. The signal on port L will occupy a single low frequency band and the
signal on port H will occupy a higher frequency band. In that situation, the diplexer
consists of a low pass filter connecting ports L and S and high pass filter connecting
ports H and S. Ideally, all the signal power on port L is transferred to the S port and
vice versa. None of the low band signal is transferred from S port to the H port.
Some power will be lost, and some signal power will leak to the wrong port. The
diplexer, being a passive device, is reciprocal; the device itself doesn’t have a
notion of input or output. The diplexer is a different device than a passive combiner
or splitter. The ports of a diplexer are frequency selective; the ports of a combiner
are not. This is also a power “loss” difference—a combiner takes all the power
delivered to the S port and divides it between the A and B ports. A diplexer
multiplexes two ports onto one port, but more than two ports may be multiplexed: a
three port to one port multiplexer is known as a triplexer. Our BPF diplexer without
a series input circuits splits transmit from receive frequency in an FDD (Frequency
Division Duplex) transceiver. A diplexer can be placed at the output of a frequency
RF source, where it functions as an absorptive filter [91, 92].
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 675

Fig. 7.1 BPF diplexer without a series input block diagram with RF source, output matching
network and Rload

Filter 1 of the duplexer has a BPF that corresponds with the undesired frequency
band, which can pass right through with little attenuation, and is terminated within
the 50 X load. These undesired frequencies are blocked from entering filter 2 by
that filter’s stop band. Filter 2 BPF passes all the desired signals onto the load
through matching network with little attenuation. The undesired signals through the
diplexer are absorbed instead of being reflected as they would be in a typical filter.
This absorption will prevent any undesired frequency products that were created by
the RF source nonlinearity, from being bounced off of a reflective filters stopbands,
which would return to the RF source and cause increased Inter Modulation
Distortion (IMD) levels. The design of a diplexer is as two different frequency
filters with non-overlapping band pass. The full BPF diplexer without a series input
circuit is presented in the next figure. The matching network between diplexer unit
and load can be L-type, Pi-type, and T-type.

Fig. 7.2 BPF diplexer without a series input circuit


676 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

In actual microwave and RF system the diplexer unit is connected through micro
strips lines to RF source, 50 X resistor, and load through matching network. We
represent these micro strips parasitic effects as a delay lines in time. The delays are
related to the current which flows through micro strips and are sin, sout1, and sout2
respectively. We choose T-type matching network. Maximum power transfer is
achieved by using T matching network (passive) connected between diplexer unit
and load Rload. The circuit matching network no only designed to meet the
requirement of minimum power loss but to additional targets. The additional targets
of matching network are minimizing noise influence, maximizing power handling
capabilities, and linearizing the frequency response [107, 108].

Fig. 7.3 BPF diplexer without a series input full schematic with delay line elements

Vsin ¼ VA1  VA2 ; Vsout1 ¼ VA4  VA5 ; Vsout2 ¼ VA6  VA7 ; Vsin ! e; Vsout1 ! e; Vsout2
!e

IR1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 ðt  sout2 Þ þ IC1 ðt  sout2 Þ; ILn1 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ; IRs ðt  sin Þ
¼ IC2 ðtÞ þ IL1 ðtÞ þ IC1 ðtÞ

Vs ðtÞ  VA1 dðVA2  VA3 Þ dIL


IR s ¼ ; IC2 ¼ C2  ; VL2 ¼ VA3  VA4 ¼ L2  2
Rs dt dt

dIL1 dðVA2  VA6 Þ VA


VL1 ¼ VA2  VA6 ¼ L1  ; IC1 ¼ C1  ; IR1 ¼ 7 ; VLn1
dt dt R1
dILn1
¼ VA5  VA8 ¼ Ln1 
dt
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 677

dILn2 dVA8 VA9


VLn2 ¼ VA8  VA9 ¼ Ln2  ; ICn ¼ Cn  ; IRload ¼ ; ILn2 ¼ IRload ; IC2
dt dt Rload
¼ I L2

Vs ðtÞ  VA1
Ln1 ¼ ILn2 þ ICn ; IRs ¼ ) VA1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs ;
Rs
Z
dðVA2  VA3 Þ 1
I C2 ¼ C 2  ) VA2  VA3 ¼  IC2  dt
dt C2
dIL2 dIL1
VA3  VA4 ¼ L2  ; VA2  VA6 ¼ L1  ;
dt dt Z
dðVA2  VA6 Þ 1
I C1 ¼ C 1  ) VA2  VA6 ¼  IC1  dt
dt C1
VA dIL dIL
IR1 ¼ 7 ) VA7 ¼ IR1  R1 ; VA5  VA8 ¼ Ln1  n1 ; VA8  VA9 ¼ Ln2  n2
R1 dt dt
Z
dVA8 1 VA9
ICn ¼ Cn  ) VA8 ¼  ICn  dt; IRload ¼ ) VA9 ¼ IRload  Rload
dt Cn Rload

dIL2
VA1  VA2 ; VA4  VA5 ; VA6  VA7 ; VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs ; VA3  VA5 ¼ L2 
dt
Z Z
dIL1 1 1
VA2  VA7 ¼ L1  ; VA2  VA7 ¼  IC1  dt; VA3 ¼ VA2   IC2  dt
dt C1 C2
Z
1 dIL
VA3 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs   IC2  dt; VA3  VA5 ¼ L2  2 ) VA5
C2 dt
dIL2
¼ VA3  L2 
dt
Z
1 dIL dIL
VA5 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs   IC2  dt  L2  2 ; VA7 ¼ VA2  L1  1
C2 dt dt
Z
dIL 1
VA7 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs  L1  1 ; VA7 ¼ VA2   IC1  dt; VA7
Zdt C1
1
¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs   IC1  dt
C1

&&&
Z
1
IR1  R1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs   IC1  dt; IR1  R1
C1 Z
dIL 1 dIL
¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs  L1  1 ;  IC1  dt ¼ L1  1
dt C1 dt
678 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dILn1 dIL
VA5  VA8 ¼ Ln1  ) VA8 ¼ VA5  Ln1  n1 ; VA8
dt Z dt
1 dIL dIL
¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs   IC2  dt  L2  2  Ln1  n1
C2 dt dt
Z Z
1 1 dIL dIL 1
 I Cn  dt ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs   IC2  dt  L2  2  Ln1  n1 ;
Cn Z C2 dt dt Cn

 ICn  dt  IRload  Rload


dILn2
¼ Ln2 
dt

We can summery our system differential equations (Version 1):


Z
1
IR1  R1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs   IC1  dt; IR1  R1
C1 Z
dIL1 1 dIL
¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs  L1  ;  IC1  dt ¼ L1  1
dt C1 dt
Z Z
1 1 dIL dIL
 I Cn  dt ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs   IC2  dt  L2  2  Ln1  n1
Cn C2 dt dt
Z
1 dILn2
 ICn  dt  IRload  Rload ¼ Ln2  ; ILn2 ¼ IRload ; IC2 ¼ IL2
Cn dt

We can summery our system differential equations (Version 2):

dIR1 dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 dIR1


 R1 ¼   Rs   IC1 ;  R1
dt dt dt C1 dt
dVs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL 1 d 2 IL
¼   Rs  L1  2 1 ;  I C 1 ¼ L1  2 1
dt dt dt C1 dt

1 dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 d 2 IL d 2 ILn1 1 dIL


 ICn ¼   Rs   IL2  L2  2 2  Ln1  2
;  ICn  n2
Cn dt dt C2 dt dt Cn dt
 Rload
d 2 ILn2
¼ Ln2 
dt2

We can summery our system differential equations (Version 3):

IR1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 ðt  sout2 Þ þ IC1 ðt  sout2 Þ; ILn1 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ; IRs ðt  sin Þ
¼ IC2 ðtÞ þ IL1 ðtÞ þ IC1 ðtÞ
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 679

dIL1
IR1  R1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs  L1  ; ½IL1 ðt  sout2 Þ þ IC1 ðt  sout2 Þ  R1
dt
dIL1
¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs  L1 
dt
d dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 1
½IL1 ðt  sout2 Þ þ IC1 ðt  sout2 Þ  R1 ¼   Rs   I C1 ;  I C1
dt dt dt C1 C1
d 2 IL
¼ L1  2 1
dt

1 dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 d 2 IL d 2 IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ


 I Cn ¼   Rs   IL2  L2  2 2  Ln1 
Cn dt dt C2 dt dt2

1 dIL d 2 ILn2
 ICn  n2  Rload ¼ Ln2  ; IRs ðt  sin Þ ¼ IL2 ðtÞ þ IL1 ðtÞ þ IC1 ðtÞ
Cn dt dt2
dI dI dI
We define new system variables: dtL1 ¼ X1 ; dtL2 ¼ X2 ; dtLn2 ¼ X3
We can summery our system differential equations (Version 4):

½IL1 ðt  sout2 Þ þ IC1 ðt  sout2 Þ  R1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs Rs  L1  X1

dIL1 ðt  sout2 Þ dIC1 ðt  sout2 Þ dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 1


 R1 þ  R1 ¼   Rs   I C1 ;  I C1
dt dt dt dt C1 C1
dX1
¼ L1 
dt

1 dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 dX2 d 2 IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ


 I Cn ¼   Rs   I L 2  L2   Ln1 
Cn dt dt C2 dt dt2

1 dX3 dX3 1 Rload


 ICn  X3  Rload ¼ Ln2  ) ¼  ICn  X3 
Cn dt dt Cn  Ln2 Ln2

IRs ðt  sin Þ ¼ IC2 ðtÞ þ IL1 ðtÞ þ IC1 ðtÞ; ILn1 ¼ ILn2 þ ICn

Remark 1.0 IL1 ðt  sout2 Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt  eksout2 ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt

dIL1 ðtÞ dIL1 ðt  sout2 Þ dIL1 ðt  sout2 Þ


¼ iL1  k  ekt ; ¼ iL1  k  ekt  eksout2 ;
dt dt dt
dIL1 ðtÞ ksout2
¼ e
dt
Remark 1.1 IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ ¼ IL2 þ iL2  ekt  eksout1 ; IL2 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 þ iL2  ekt
680 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dIL2 ðtÞ dIL2 ðt  sout1 Þ dIL2 ðt  sout1 Þ


¼ iL2  k  ekt ; ¼ iL2  k  ekt  eksout1 ;
dt dt dt
dIL2 ðtÞ ksout1
¼ e
dt
Remark 1.2 IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ ¼ IL2 þ iL2  ekt  eksout1 ; IL2 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 þ iL2  ekt

d 2 IL2 ðtÞ d 2 IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ d 2 IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ


2
¼ iL2  k2  ekt ; 2
¼ iL2  k2  ekt  eksout1 ;
dt dt dt2
d IL2 ðtÞ ksout1
2
¼ e
dt2
Remark 1.3 IC1 ðt  sout2 Þ ¼ IC 1 þ iC1  ekt  eksout2 ; IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IC 1 þ iC1  ekt

dIC1 ðtÞ dIC1 ðt  sout2 Þ dIC1 ðt  sout2 Þ


¼ iC1  k  ekt ; ¼ iC1  k  ekt  eksout2 ;
dt dt dt
dIC1 ðtÞ ksout2
¼ e
dt
Remark 1.4 IRs ðt  sin Þ ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekt  eksin ; IRs ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekt

dIRs ðtÞ dIRs ðt  sin Þ dIRs ðt  sin Þ


¼ iRs  k  ekt ; ¼ iRs  k  ekt  eksin ;
dt dt dt
dIRs ðtÞ ksin
¼ e
dt
We can summery our system differential equations (Version 5):

dIL1 dIL1 ðtÞ dIL2 dIL2 ðtÞ dX2 d 2 IL2 d 2 IL2 ðtÞ dIC1 dIC1 ðtÞ
¼ ; ¼ ; ¼ 2 ¼ ; ¼
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt2 dt dt

&&& dX3
dt ¼ Cn L
1
n2
 ICn  X3  RLload
n2

dIRs ðt  sin Þ dIL2 ðtÞ dIL1 ðtÞ dIC1 ðtÞ dIRs ðtÞ X2
dIC1 ksin
¼ þ þ ; ¼½ Xk   eksin þ e
dt dt dt dt dt k¼1
dt

dIL1 ðt  sout2 Þ dIC1 ðt  sout2 Þ dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 1


 R1 þ  R1 ¼   Rs   I C1 ;  I C1
dt dt dt dt C1 C1
dX1
¼ L1 
dt
dIL1 ðtÞ ksout2 dIC1 ðtÞ ksout2 dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 dX1
e  R1 þ e  R1 ¼   Rs   I C1 ;
dt dt dt dt C1 dt
1
¼  I C1
L1  C1
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 681

dIC1 ksout2 dVs ðtÞ X2


dIC1 ksin
X1  eksout2  R1 þ e  R1 ¼  f½ Xk   eksin þ  e g  Rs
dt dt k¼1
dt
1
  I C1
C1

dIC1 dVs ðtÞ X 2


1
½eksout2  R1 þ Rs  eksin   ¼ ½ Xk   Rs  eksin   IC1  X1
dt dt k¼1
C1
 eksout2  R1

dIC1 1 dVs ðtÞ X2a  Rs


¼ ks   X1  ks  eksin
dt ðe out2  R1 þ Rs  eksin Þ dt ðe out2  R1 þ Rs  eksin Þ
1
 ks
 IC1 ; n1 ðR1 ; Rs ; sout2 ; sin ; kÞ
C1  ðe out2  R1 þ Rs  eksin Þ
¼ eksout2  R1 þ Rs  eksin

dIC1 1 dVs ðtÞ X2  Rs ksin 1


n1 ¼ n1 ðR1 ; Rs ; sout2 ; sin ; kÞ; ¼   X1  e   I C1
dt n1 dt n1 C 1  n1

1 dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 dX2 d 2 IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ


 I Cn ¼   Rs   I L 2  L2   Ln1 
Cn dt dt C2 dt dt2

1 dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 dX2 d 2 IL2 ðtÞ ksout1


 ICn ¼   Rs   I L 2  L2   Ln1  e
Cn dt dt C2 dt dt2

1 dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 dX2 dX2 ksout1


 I Cn ¼   Rs   I L 2  L2   Ln1  e
Cn dt dt C2 dt dt

dX2 dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 1


½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1   ¼   Rs   IL   I Cn
dt dt dt C2 2 Cn

dX2 dVs ðtÞ X 2


dIC1 ksin 1
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1   ¼ ½ Xk   eksin  Rs  e  Rs   I L2
dt dt k¼1
dt C2
1
  I Cn
Cn

We can summery our system differential equations (Version 6):

dIL1 dIL2 dILn2 dX1 1


¼ X1 ; ¼ X2 ; ¼ X3 ; ¼  IC 1
dt dt dt dt L1  C1
dIC1 1 dVs ðtÞ X2  Rs ksin 1 dX3 1 Rload
¼   X1  e   IC 1 ; ¼  ICn  X3 
dt n1 dt n1 C 1  n1 dt Cn  Ln2 Ln2
682 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

P
dX2 1 dVs ðtÞ ½ 2k¼1 Xk   eksin dIC1 Rs  eksin
¼    R s  
dt ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  dt ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  dt ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1 1
  IL   ICn
C2  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  2 Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 

dIRs X 2
1 dVs ðtÞ X2  Rs ksin 1
¼½ Xk   eksin þ ½   X1  e   IC1   eksin
dt k¼1
n 1 dt n 1 C 1  n 1

dIL1 dIL2 dILn2 dIRs


At fixed points: dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dX1
dt ¼ 0; dX3
dt ¼ 0; dX2
dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0
dVs ðtÞ
Assumption dt !e

dVs ðtÞ
X1 ¼ 0; X2 ¼ 0; X3 ¼ 0; IC 1 ¼ 0; IC 1 ¼ C1  ! e; IC n ¼ 0; IL2
dt
dVs ðtÞ
¼ C2  !e
dt
ILn1 ¼ ILn2 þ ICn ) ICn ¼ ILn1  ILn2 ; ICn ¼ IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ  ILn2
We can summery our system differential equations (Version 7):

dIL1 dIL2 dILn2 dX1 1


¼ X1 ; ¼ X2 ; ¼ X3 ; ¼  I C1
dt dt dt dt L1  C1
dIC1 1 dVs ðtÞ X2  Rs ksin 1
¼   X1  e   IC1 ;
dt n1 dt n1 C1  n1
dX3 1 Rload
¼  ½IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ  ILn2   X3 
dt Cn  Ln2 Ln2
P
dX2 1 dVs ðtÞ ½ 2k¼1 Xk   eksin
¼    Rs
dt ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  dt ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1 dVs ðtÞ X2  Rs ksin 1 Rs  eksin
½   X1  e   IC1  
n1 dt n1 C1  n1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1 1
  IL   ½IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ  ILn2 
C2  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  2 Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 

dIRs X 2
1 dVs ðtÞ X2  Rs ksin 1
¼½ Xk   eksin þ ½   X1  e   IC1   eksin
dt k¼1
n 1 dt n 1 C 1  n1

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of BPF diplexer circuit consists in adding to its coordinated
[X1 X2 X3 IL1 IL2 ILn2 IC1 IRS ] arbitrarily small increments of exponential terms
½x1 x2 x3 iL1 iL2 iLn2 iC1 iRS   ekt , and retaining the first order terms in
x1 x2 x3 iL1 iL2 iLn2 iC1 iRS .
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 683

The system of eight homogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic


equation in the eigenvalue k. The polynomial characteristic equation accepts by set
the BPF diplexer circuit equations. The BPF diplexer circuit fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x1 x2 x3 iL1 iL2 iLn2 iC1 iRS   ekt are;
i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
[2–4].

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X1 ðtÞ ¼ X1 þ x1  ekt ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x2  ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3 ðtÞ ¼ X3 þ x3  ekt ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
IL2 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 þ iL2  ekt ; ILn2 ðtÞ ¼ ILn2 þ iLn2  ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IC1 þ iC1  ekt ; IRs ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekt
ðiÞ dIL1
IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ ¼ IL2 þ iL2  ekðtsout1 Þ ; ¼ iL1  k  ekt ;
dt
dIL2 dILn2
¼ iL2  k  ekt ; ¼ iLn2  k  ekt
dt dt
dX1 dX2 dX3 dIC1
¼ x1  k  ekt ; ¼ x2  k  ekt ; ¼ x3  k  ekt ; ¼ iC1  k  ekt ; 8 i
dt dt dt dt
¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .

For k < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 unstable.
Our BPF diplexer circuit tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for k < 0,
t > 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the
eigenvalue parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or unstable,
additionally his absolute value |k| establish the speed of flow toward or away from
the selected fixed point [4].

dIL1 ðiÞ ðiÞ


¼ X1 ) iL1  k  ekt ¼ X1 þ x1  ekt ; X1 ¼ X1 ¼ 0; iL1  k þ x1 ¼ 0
dt
dIL2 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X2 ) iL2  k  ekt ¼ X2 þ x2  ekt ; X2 ¼ X2 ¼ 0; iL2  k þ x2 ¼ 0
dt
dILn2 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X3 ) iLn2  k  ekt ¼ X3 þ x3  ekt ; X3 ¼ X3 ¼ 0; iLn2  k þ x3 ¼ 0
dt
dX1 1 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼  IC1 ) x1  k  ekt ¼  ½I þ iC1  ekt ; IC1 ¼ IC 1
dt L1  C1 L1  C1 C1
1
¼ 0; x1  k þ  i C1 ¼ 0
L1  C1

dIC1 1 dVs ðtÞ X2  Rs ksin 1


¼   X1  e   I C1
dt n1 dt n1 C1  n1
684 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ ½X þ x2  ekt   Rs ksin 1
iC1  k  ekt ¼   ½X1 þ x1  ekt   2 e 
n1 dt n1 C1  n1
ðiÞ
 ½IC1 þ iC1  ekt 

ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ X  Rs ksin 1 ðiÞ
iC1  k  ekt ¼   X1  2 e  I
n1 dt n1 C1  n1 C1
x2  ekt  Rs ksin 1
 x1  ekt  e   iC1  ekt
n1 C 1  n1
ðiÞ
ðiÞ X2 Rs ðiÞ
At fixed point: 1
n1  dVdts ðtÞ  X1  n1  eksin  C11n1  IC1 ¼ 0

Rs ksin 1
iC1  k  x1  x2  e   i C1 ¼ 0
n1 C 1  n1

dX3 1 Rload
¼  ½IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ  ILn2 ðtÞ  X3  ; lim IL ðt  sout1 Þ ¼ ILn2 ðtÞ; t
dt Cn  Ln2 Ln2 t!1 2
 sout1

1 ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


x3  k  ekt ¼  ½I þ iL2  ekðtsout1 Þ  ILn2  iLn2  ekt   ½X3 þ x3  ekt 
Cn  Ln2 L2
Rload

Ln2

1 ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ Rload 1


x3  k  ekt ¼  ½I  ILn2   X3  þ
Cn  Ln2 L2 Ln2 Cn  Ln2
Rload kt
 ½iL2  ekðtsout1 Þ  iLn2  ekt   x3  e
Ln2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed point: 1
Cn Ln2  ½IL2  ILn2   X3  RLload
n2
¼0

Rload 1 1
x3  k  x3  þ  iL  eksout1   iL ¼ 0
Ln2 Cn  Ln2 2 Cn  Ln2 n2
P
dX2 1 dVs ðtÞ ½ 2k¼1 Xk   eksin
¼    Rs
dt ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  dt ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1 dVs ðtÞ X2  Rs ksin 1 Rs  eksin
½   X1  e   IC1  
n1 dt n1 C1  n1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1 1
  IL   ½IL2 ðt  sout1 Þ  ILn2 
C2  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  2 Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 685

P2 ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ½ ðXk þ xk  ekt Þ  eksin
x2  k  ekt ¼   k¼1
 Rs
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  dt ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ ½X þ x2  ekt   Rs ksin
f   ½X1 þ x1  ekt   2 e
n1 dt n1
1 ðiÞ Rs  eksin
  ½IC1 þ iC1  ekt g 
C 1  n1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1 ðiÞ
  ½I þ iL2  ekt 
C2  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  L2
1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
  ½I þ iL2  ekðtsout1 Þ  ILn2  iLn2  ekt 
Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  L2
P ðiÞ
kt 1 dVs ðtÞ ½ 2k¼1 Xk   eksin
x2  k  e ¼    Rs
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  dt ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ X  Rs ksin 1 ðiÞ Rs  eksin
f   X1  2 e   IC1 g 
n1 dt n1 C1  n 1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
 I   ½I  ILn2 
C2  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  L2 Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  L2
P
½ 2k¼1 xk   eksin  ekt x2  ekt  Rs ksin
 ks
 Rs  fx1  ekt  e
½L2 þ Ln1  e out1  n1
1 Rs  eksin
  iC1  ekt g 
C 1  n1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1
  iL  ekt
C2  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  2
1
  ½iL2  eksout1  iLn2   ekt
Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 

At fixed point:
P ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ½ 2k¼1 Xk   eksin
   Rs
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  dt ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ X  Rs ksin 1 ðiÞ Rs  eksin
f   X1  2 e   I C1 g 
n1 dt n1 C1  n1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
 ks
 I L2   ½I  ILn2  ¼ 0
C2  ½L2 þ Ln1  e out1  Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  L2
686 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

P
½ 2k¼1 xk   eksin x2  Rs ksin
 x2  k   Rs  fx1  e
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  n1
1 Rs  eksin
  iC1 g 
C1  n1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1
  iL
C2  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  2
1
  ½iL2  eksout1  iLn2  ¼ 0
Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 

ðRn1s  eksin  1Þ  eksin


1 Rs  eksin
 x2  k þ x2   Rs þ
  iC
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
C1  n1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  1
1 1 ksout1 1 1
ð þ e Þ  iL þ  iL ¼ 0
C2 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  2 Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  n2

Remark: The last differential equation dIdtRs ¼ . . . is not essential for our circuit
stability analysis.
We can summery our BPF diplexer arbitrarily small increments equations.

 iL1  k þ x1 ¼ 0; iL2  k þ x2 ¼ 0; iLn2  k þ x3 ¼ 0;


1 Rs
 iC1  k   iC1  x1  x2   eksin ¼ 0
C1  n1 n1
1 Rload
 x1  k þ  iC1 ¼ 0; x3  k  x3 
L1  C1 Ln2
1 1
þ  iL  eksout1   iL ¼ 0
Cn  Ln2 2 Cn  Ln2 n2

ðRn1s  eksin  1Þ  eksin


1 Rs  eksin
 x2  k þ x2   Rs þ
  iC
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
C1  n1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  1
1 1 ksout1 1 1
ð þ e Þ  iL þ  iL ¼ 0
C2 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  2 Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1  n2

0 1
iL1
B i C
B L C
0 1 B 2C
N11 ... N17 B iLn2 C
B C
B .. .. .. C B C
@ . . . A  B i C C ¼ 0 ; N11 ¼ k ; N12 ¼ N13 ¼ N14 ¼ 0 ; N15
B 1C
N71  N77 B x1 C
B C
B C
@ x2 A
x3
¼ 1 ; N16 ¼ N17 ¼ 0
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 687

N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ k; N23 ¼ N24 ¼ N25 ¼ 0; N26 ¼ 1; N27 ¼ 0; N31 ¼ N32
¼ 0; N33 ¼ k

N34 ¼ N35 ¼ N36 ¼ 0; N37 ¼ 1; N41 ¼ N42 ¼ N43 ¼ 0;


1
N44 ¼ k  ; N45 ¼ 1
C 1  n1
Rs 1
N46 ¼   eksin ; N47 ¼ 0; N51 ¼ N52 ¼ N53 ¼ 0; N54 ¼ ;
n1 L1  C1
N55 ¼ k; N56 ¼ N57 ¼ 0

1 1 ksout1 1
N61 ¼ 0; N62 ¼ ð þ e Þ ; N63
C2 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1
¼
Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 

1 Rs  eksin
N64 ¼  ; N65 ¼ 0; N66
C1  n1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
ksin ksin
ðn  e
Rs
 1Þ  e
¼ k þ 1  Rs ; N67 ¼ 0
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 

1 1
N71 ¼ 0; N72 ¼  eksout1 ; N73 ¼  ; N74 ¼ N75 ¼ N76 ¼ 0; N77
Cn  Ln2 Cn  Ln2
Rload
¼ k 
Ln2

We define for simplicity global parameters in our system:

n1 ¼ n1 ðR1 ; Rs ; sout2 ; sin ; kÞ¼eksout2  R1 þ Rs  eksin

ðC12 þ 1
Cn  eksout1 Þ
w1 ¼ w1 ðC2 ; Cn ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ; kÞ ¼ 
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 

1
w2 ¼ w2 ðCn ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ; kÞ ¼
Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 

1 Rs  eksin
w3 ¼ w3 ðC1 ; R1 ; Rs ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 ; kÞ ¼ 
C1  n1 ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
1 Rs  eksin
¼ 
C1  ½eksout2  R1 þ Rs  eksin  ½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
688 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

ðRn1s  eksin  1Þ  eksin


w4 ¼ w4 ðRs ; R1 ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ; sout2 ; kÞ ¼  Rs
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 
ð½eksout2 RRsþ R eksin   eksin  1Þ  eksin
¼ 1 s
 Rs
½L2 þ Ln1  eksout1 

N62 ¼ w1 ¼ w1 ðC2 ; Cn ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ; kÞ; N63 ¼ w2 ¼ w2 ðCn ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ; kÞ

N64 ¼ w3 ¼ w3 ðC1 ; R1 ; Rs ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 ; kÞ; N66 ¼ w4


¼ w4 ðRs ; R1 ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ; sout2 ; kÞ
0 1 0 1
N11 . . . N17 N11 . . . N17
B . .. .. C B .. .. .. C
ðA  k  IÞ ¼ @ .. . . A ; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ det@ . . . A¼0
N71    N77 N71    N77
0 1
N11 . . . N17
B . .. .. C
B
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ det@ .. C
. . A ¼ ðkÞ  fðkÞ  ½ðkÞ  P1 ðkÞ þ P2 ðkÞ
N71    N77
 ½k  P3 ðkÞ þ P4 ðkÞg
Rload 1
P1 ðkÞ ¼ k4 þ k3  ½  w4 þ  þ k2
Ln2 C1  n1
1 Rload Rload 1 Rs
½ ð  w4 Þ  w4  þ þ  esin k  w3 
C1  n1 Ln2 Ln2 L1  C1 n1
Rload 1 w4  Rload Rload  Rs ksin
þ k  ½ð  w4 Þ   þ e  w3 
Ln2 L1  C1 C1  n1  Ln2 n1  Ln2
Rload
 w4 
Ln2  L1  C1
1 1 w 1 Rs
P2 ðkÞ ¼  ½k3 þ k2  ðw4  Þþk  ð 4    eksin  w3 Þ
Cn  Ln2 C1  n1 C1  n1 L1  C1 n1
1
þ w4  
L1  C1

1 1 1
P2 ðkÞ ¼   k3 þ k2   ðw4  Þ
Cn  Ln2 Cn  Ln2 C1  n1
1 w 1 Rs
þk  ð 4    eksin  w3 Þ
Cn  Ln2 C1  n1 L1  C1 n1
1 1
þ  w4 
Cn  Ln2 L1  C1
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 689

Table 7.1 BPF diplexer circuit cases for sin, sout1, sout2
Case no. sin sout1 sout2
1 0 0 0
2 s 0 0
3 0 s 0
4 0 0 s
5 s s 0
6 0 s s
7 s 0 s
8 s s s

Rload 1
P3 ðkÞ ¼ w1  k3 þ k2  w1  ð þ Þ þ k  w1
Ln2 C1  n1
Rload 1 w1  Rload
ð þ Þþ
C1  n1  Ln2 L1  C1 L1  C1  Ln2

1 1
P4 ðkÞ ¼ k2  ½  w þ w2   eksout1 
Cn  Ln2 1 Cn  Ln2
1 1
þk    ½w1 þ w2  eksout1 
C1  n1 Cn  Ln2
1 1
þ   ½w1 þ w2  eksout1 
L1  C1 Cn  Ln2

detðA  k  IÞ ¼ k3  P1 ðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ þ k2  P2 ðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ
þ k2  P3 ðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ þ k  P4 ðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ

We analyze our BPF diplexer circuit for the following cases:


Case No. 1: sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0:

n1 ðR1 ; Rs ; sout2 ¼ 0; sin ¼ 0; kÞ¼R1 þ Rs ; w1 ¼ w1 ðC2 ; Cn ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ¼ 0; kÞ


ð1 þ 1Þ
¼  C2 Cn
½L2 þ Ln1 

1
w2 ¼ w2 ðCn ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼
Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1 

w3 ¼ w3 ðC1 ; R1 ; Rs ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0; kÞ


1 Rs 1 Rs
¼  ¼ 
C1  n1 ðsout2 ¼ 0; sin ¼ 0Þ ½L2 þ Ln1  C1  ½R1 þ Rs  ½L2 þ Ln1 
690 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

ðRn1s  1Þ
w4 ¼ w4 ðRs ; R1 ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼  Rs
½L2 þ Ln1 
ð½R1 Rþs Rs   1Þ
¼  Rs
½L2 þ Ln1 

1 1
P2 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼   k3 þ k2 
Cn  Ln2 Cn  Ln2
1
 ðw4 ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ  Þ
C1  n1 ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
1 w ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ 1
þk  ð 4 
Cn  Ln2 C1  n1 ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ L1  C1
Rs
  w ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0ÞÞ
n1 ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ 3
1 1
þ  w ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ 
Cn  Ln2 4 L1  C1

Rload
P1 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ k3  ½  w4 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Ln2
1 1
þ  þ k2  ½
C1  n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ C1  n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Rload
ð  w4 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0ÞÞ  w4 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Ln2
Rload 1 Rs
 þ þ
Ln2 L1  C1 n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
 esin k  w3 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ þ k
Rload
 ½ð  w4 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0ÞÞ
Ln2
1 w ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ  Rload
  4
L1  C1 C1  n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ  Ln2
Rload  Rs
þ
n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ  Ln2
 eksin  w3 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ  w4 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Rload

Ln2  L1  C1
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 691

P3 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ w1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ  k3


þ k2  w1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Rload 1
ð þ Þ
Ln2 C1  n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
þ k  w1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Rload 1
ð þ Þ
C1  n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ  Ln2 L1  C1
w ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ  Rload
þ 1
L1  C1  Ln2

1
P4 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k2  ½  w ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Cn  Ln2 1
1
þ w2 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ  
Cn  Ln2
1 1
þk  
C1  n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ Cn  Ln2
 ½w1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
1 1
þ w2 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ þ 
L1  C1 Cn  Ln2
 ½w1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
þ w2 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ

We can summery our w1 ; w2 ; w3 ; w4 expression for sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0:

ðC12 þ Cn Þ
1
1
w1 ðsout1 ¼ 0Þ ¼  ; w2 ðsout1 ¼ 0Þ ¼ ; n ðsout2 ¼ 0; sin
½L2 þ Ln1  Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  1
¼ 0Þ ¼ R1 þ Rs

1 Rs
w3 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼  ; w ðsout1 ¼ 0; sout2
C1  ½R1 þ Rs  ½L2 þ Ln1  4
ð½R1 Rþs Rs   1Þ
¼ 0Þ ¼  Rs
½L2 þ Ln1 

&&&
692 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

Rload ð½R1 Rþs Rs   1Þ


P1 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k þ k  ½
4 3
ð  Rs Þ
Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 
1 1 Rload ð½R Rþs R   1Þ
þ  þ k2  ½ ð ð 1 s  Rs ÞÞ
C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 
ð½R1 Rþs Rs   1Þ Rload 1 Rs 1 Rs
ð  Rs Þ  þ þ ð  Þ
½L2 þ Ln1  Ln2 L1  C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ C1  ½R1 þ Rs  ½L2 þ Ln1 
ð Rs
1Þ
Rload ð½R Rþs R   1Þ 1 ð ½R½L12þþRsL n1   Rs Þ  Rload
þ k  ½ð ð 1 s  Rs ÞÞ  
Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  L1  C1 C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ  Ln2
Rload  Rs 1 Rs
þ ð  Þ
ðR1 þ Rs Þ  Ln2 C1  ½R1 þ Rs  ½L2 þ Ln1 
ð½R1 Rþs Rs   1Þ Rload
ð  Rs Þ 
½L2 þ Ln1  Ln2  L1  C1

We define for simplicity new global parameters:

Rload ð½R Rþs R   1Þ 1


A4 ¼ 1; A3 ¼ ð 1 s  Rs Þ þ ; A0
Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ
ð½R Rþs R   1Þ Rload
¼ ð 1 s  Rs Þ 
½L2 þ Ln1  Ln2  L1  C1

1 Rload ð½R Rþs R   1Þ ð½R Rþs R   1Þ Rload


A2 ¼ ð ð 1 s  Rs ÞÞ  ð 1 s  Rs Þ 
C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  ½L2 þ Ln1  Ln2
1 Rs 1 Rs
þ þ ð  Þ
L1  C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ C1  ½R1 þ Rs  ½L2 þ Ln1 

ð Rs
1Þ
Rload ð½R1 Rþs Rs   1Þ 1 ð ½R½L12þþRsL n1   Rs Þ  Rload
A1 ¼ ð ð  Rs ÞÞ  
Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  L1  C1 C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ  Ln2
Rload  Rs 1 Rs
þ ð  Þ
ðR1 þ Rs Þ  Ln2 C1  ½R1 þ Rs  ½L2 þ Ln1 

X
4
P1 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ kk  Ak
k¼0
¼ k4 jA4 ¼1 þ k3  A3 þ k2  A2 þ k  A1 þ A0
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 693

1 1
P2 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼   k3 þ k 2 
Cn  Ln2 Cn  Ln2
ð½R1 Rþs Rs   1Þ 1 1
ð  Rs  Þþk 
½L2 þ Ln1  C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ Cn  Ln2
ð½RRs
1Þ
1 þ Rs 
½L2 þ Ln1   Rs 1 Rs 1 Rs
ð     Þ
C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ L1  C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ C1  ½R1 þ Rs  ½L2 þ Ln1 
1 ð½R1 Rþs Rs   1Þ 1
þ   Rs 
Cn  Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  L1  C1

We define for simplicity new global parameters:

1 1 ð½R Rþs R   1Þ 1
B3 ¼  ; B2 ¼ ð 1 s  Rs  Þ
Cn  Ln2 Cn  Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ

ð½RRs
1Þ
½L þ L   Rs
1 þ Rs 
1 1 Rs 1 Rs
B1 ¼  ð 2 n1     Þ
Cn  Ln2 C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ L1  C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ C1  ½R1 þ Rs  ½L2 þ Ln1 

1 ð½R Rþs R   1Þ 1
B0 ¼  1 s  Rs 
Cn  Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  L1  C1

X
3
P2 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ kk  Bk ¼ k3  B3 þ k2  B2 þ k  B1 þ B0
k¼0

ðC12 þ Cn Þ
1
ðC12 þ Cn Þ
1
P3 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼   k 3  k2 
½L2 þ Ln1  ½L2 þ Ln1 
Rload 1 ð 1
þ 1
Þ Rload 1
ð þ Þ  k  C 2 Cn  ð þ Þ
Ln2 C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ ½L2 þ Ln1  C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ  Ln2 L1  C1
ðC1 þ C1n Þ
2
½L2 þ Ln1   Rload

L1  C1  Ln2

ðC12 þ Cn Þ
1
ðC12 þ Cn Þ
1
Rload 1
C3 ¼  ; C2 ¼  ð þ Þ
½L2 þ Ln1  ½L2 þ Ln1  Ln2 C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ

ð1 þ 1
Þ
ðC12 þ Cn Þ ½L þ L   Rload
1 C2 Cn
Rload 1
C1 ¼  ð þ Þ; C0 ¼  2 n1
½L2 þ Ln1  C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ  Ln2 L1  C1 L1  C1  Ln2
694 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

X
3
P3 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ kk  Ck ¼ k3  C3 þ k2  C2 þ k  C1 þ C0
k¼0

1 ð1 þ 1Þ
P4 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k2  ½  ð C2 Cn Þ
Cn  Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 
1 1 1 1 ð1 þ 1Þ
þ  þk    ½ C2 Cn
Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  Cn  Ln2 C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ Cn  Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 
1 1 1 ð þ Þ
1 1
1
þ þ   ½ C2 Cn þ 
Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  L1  C1 Cn  Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1 

1 ð1 þ 1Þ 1 1
D2 ¼   ð C 2 Cn Þ þ 
Cn  Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1  Cn  Ln2

1 1 ð1 þ 1Þ 1
D1 ¼   ½ C2 Cn þ 
C1  ðR1 þ Rs Þ Cn  Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1 

1 1 ð1 þ 1Þ 1
D0 ¼   ½ C2 Cn þ 
L1  C1 Cn  Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1  Cn  ½L2 þ Ln1 

X
2
P4 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ kk  Dk ¼ k2  D2 þ k  D1 þ D0
k¼0

X
4 X
3 X
3
detðA  k  IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼ k3  kk  Ak þ k2  kk  B k þ k2  kk
k¼0 k¼0 k¼0
X
2
 Ck þ k  k  Dk
k

k¼0

X
4 X
3 X
3
detðA  k  IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼  kk þ 3  Ak þ kk þ 2  Bk þ kk þ 2
k¼0 k¼0 k¼0
X
2
 Ck þ kk þ 1  Dk
k¼0

X
3 X
2 X
3 X
2
kk þ 2  Ck ¼ k5  C3 þ kk þ 2  C k ; kk þ 2  Bk ¼ k5  B3 þ kk þ 2  Bk
k¼0 k¼0 k¼0 k¼0

X
4 X
2
kk þ 3  Ak ¼ k7  A4 þ k6  A3 þ kk þ 3  A k
k¼0 k¼0
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 695

X
2
detðA  k  IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼ k7  A4  k6  A3  kk þ 3  Ak þ k5  B3
k¼0
X
2 X
2 X
2
þ kk þ 2  Bk þ k5  C3 þ kk þ 2  Ck þ kk þ 1  D k
k¼0 k¼0 k¼0

detðA  k  IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼ k7  A4  k6  A3 þ k5  ðB3 þ C3 Þ


X
2
½kk þ 2  Bk þ kk þ 2  Ck þ kk þ 1  Dk  kk þ 3  Ak 
k¼0

X
2
detðA  k  IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼ k7  A4  k6  A3  kk þ 3  Ak þ k5  B3
k¼0
X
2 X
2 X
2
þ kk þ 2  Bk þ k5  C3 þ kk þ 2  Ck þ kk þ 1  D k
k¼0 k¼0 k¼0
X
2
kk þ 3  Ak ¼ k5  A2 þ k4  A1 þ k3  A0 ;
k¼0
X
2
kk þ 2  Bk ¼ k4  B2 þ k3  B1 þ k2  B0
k¼0
X
2
kk þ 2  Ck ¼ k4  C2 þ k3  C1 þ k2  C0 ;
k¼0
X
2
kk þ 1  D k ¼ k3  D 2 þ k2  D 1 þ k  D 0
k¼0

detðA  k  IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼ k7  A4  k6  A3  ½k5  A2 þ k4  A1 þ k3  A0 


þ k5  B3 þ k4  B2 þ k3  B1 þ k2  B0 þ k5  C3 þ k4  C2
þ k3  C1 þ k2  C0 þ k3  D2 þ k2  D1 þ k  D0

detðA  k  IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼ k7  A4  k6  A3 þ k5  ½B3  A2 þ C3 


þ k4  ½B2  A1 þ C2  þ k3  ½B1  A0 þ C1 þ D2  þ k2  ½B0 þ C0 þ D1  þ k  D0

X
7 X
7
detðA  k  IÞ ¼  k  kk ; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 )  k  kk ¼ 0
k¼0 k¼0

!7 ¼ 1; !6 ¼ A3 ; !5 ¼ B3  A2 þ C3 ; !4 ¼ B2  A1 þ C2 ; !3
¼ B1  A0 þ C1 þ D2
696 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

!2 ¼ B0 þ C0 þ D1 ; !1 ¼ D0 ; !0 ¼ 0

Eigenvalues stability discussion: Our BPF diplexer circuit involving N variables


(N > 2, N = 7), the characteristic equation is of degree N = 7 and must often be
solved numerically. Expect in some particular cases, such an equation has (N = 7)
distinct roots that can be real or complex. These values are the eigenvalues of the
7  7 Jacobian matrix (A). The general rule is that the Steady State (SS) is stable if
there is no eigenvalue with positive real part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is
positive for the steady state to be unstable. Our 7-variables
(X1 X2 X3 IL1 IL2 ILn2 IC1 ) BPF diplexer circuit has seven eigenvalues. The type of
behavior can be characterized as a function of the position of these eigenvalues in
the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be distinguished: (1) the seven
eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), (2) the seven eigenvalues are
real, six of them are negative (unstable steady state), (3) and (4) two eigenvalues are
complex conjugates with a negative real part and the other eigenvalues are real and
negative (stable steady state), two cases can be distinguished depending on the
relative value of the real part of the complex eigenvalues and of the real one,
(5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and at least
one eigenvalue is positive (unstable steady state) [12, 13].
Remark It is reader exercise to analyze BPF diplexer circuit stability for cases 2–8
(at least one delay parameter sin ; sout1 ; sout2 is positive and real number). The sta-
bility analysis is done by using geometric stability switch criteria in delay differ-
ential systems (E. Beretta and Y. Kuang). It is a practical guideline that combines
graphical information with analytical work to effectively study the local stability of
BPF diplexer circuit model involving delay dependent parameters. The stability of
BPF diplexer circuit steady state is determined by the graphs of some functions of s
which can be expressed explicitly.
The general geometric criterion: The occurrence of any possible stability
switching resulting from the increase of value of the time delay s for our BPF
diplexer circuit characteristic equation.

Dðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ ¼ detðA  k  IÞ; Dðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ ¼ 0; Dðk; sÞ
¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks

X
n X
m
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ  kk ; Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ; n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m
k¼0 k¼0

pk ð Þ; qk ð Þ : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable functions of s.

Pn ðk ¼ 0; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ 0; sÞ ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ q0 ðsÞ 6¼ 0 8 s 2 R þ 0
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 697

Pn ðk; sÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s for which we
assume:
(I) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R then Pn ði  x; sÞ þ Qm ði  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R.
(II) lim supfjQm ðk; sÞ=Pn ðk; sÞj : jkj ! 1; Rek
0g\1 for any s.
(III) Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPn ði  x; sÞj2  jQm ði  x; sÞj2 for each s has at most a finite
number of real zeros.
(IV) Each positive root xðsÞ of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable in s
whenever it exists.

7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under


Parameters Variation

A diplexer filters to pass two bands to separate ports, and its stability analysis under
parameters variation. In our RF and microwave system, two desired frequencies are
relative close together; design each separate filter to have its own band edge as far
as possible from the other filter. The desired frequency we want to pass is located at
the upper band edge of BPF1, while the desired frequency of BPF2 is at its lower
band edge.
The circuit of dual band diplexer filter contains capacitors and inductors, RF
source Vs(t) and series resistor Rs, two matching networks, and resistive loads
Rload1, Rload2. Three delay lines sin ; sout1 ; sout2 represent circuit micro strip lines
parasitic effects. In our stability analysis we consider fully match between Rload1
and BPF1 and between Rload2 and BPF2 (no matching networks) [25, 26].

Fig. 7.4 Dual band diplexer filter block diagram


698 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

Fig. 7.5 Dual band diplexer filter full schematic with delay lines

Vsin ! e; Vsout1 ! e; Vsout2 ! e; Vsin ¼ VA1  VA2 ; Vsout1 ¼ VA6  VA7 ; Vsout2
¼ VA11  VA12

Vs ðtÞ  VA1 dIL dðVA3  VA4 Þ


IR s ¼ ; VL5 ¼ VA2  VA3 ¼ L5  5 ; IC1 ¼ C1  ; VA4
Rs dt dt
dIL
¼ VL2 ¼ L2  2
dt
dVA4 dIL dðVA5  VA6 Þ
IC2 ¼ C2  ; VL1 ¼ VA4  VA5 ¼ L1  1 ; IC3 ¼ C3  ; IRload1
dt dt dt
VA7
¼ ; VA1  VA2
Rload1

dIL dðVA8  VA9 Þ


VA6  VA7 ; VL6 ¼ VA2  VA8 ¼ L6  6 ; IC6 ¼ C6  ; VA9 ¼ VL4
dt dt
dIL4
¼ L4 
dt
dVA9 dIL dðVA10  VA11 Þ
IC5 ¼ C5  ; VL3 ¼ VA9  VA10 ¼ L3  3 ; IC4 ¼ C4  ; IRload2
dt dt dt
VA12
¼ ; VA11  VA12
Rload2

X
6
IRs ðt  sin Þ ¼ IL5 þ IL6 ¼ ILk ; IL5 ¼ IC1 ; IL6 ¼ IC6 ; IL1 ¼ IC3 ; IL3 ¼ IC4 ; IRload1 ¼ IC3 ðt  sout1 Þ
k¼5
IRload1 ¼ IL1 ðt  sout1 Þ; IRload2 ¼ IC4 ðt  sout2 Þ; IRload2 ¼ IL3 ðt  sout2 Þ
7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 699

P
6
KCL @ node A2: IRs ðt  sin Þ ¼ IL5 þ IL6 ¼ ILk , KCL @ node A4:
k¼5
P
2
IC1 ¼ IL2 þ IC2 þ IL1 ¼ IC2 þ I Lk
k¼1
P
4
KCL @ node A9: IC6 ¼ IL4 þ IC5 þ IL3 ¼ IC5 þ I Lk
k¼3
&&&

Vs ðtÞ  VA1 dIL


IRs ¼ ) VA1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs ; VA2  VA3 ¼ L5  5
Rs dt
Z
dVA4 1
IC2 ¼ C2  ) VA4 ¼  IC2  dt
dt C2
Z
dðVA3  VA4 Þ 1 dIL
IC1 ¼ C1  ) VA3  VA4 ¼  IC1  dt; VA4  VA5 ¼ L1  1
dt C1 dt
dIL1
) VA5 ¼ VA4  L1 
dt
Z
1 dIL dðVA5  VA6 Þ
VA5 ¼  IC2  dt  L1  1 ; IC3 ¼ C3  ) VA5  VA6
C2 Z dt dt
1
¼  IC3  dt; VA7 ¼ IRload1  Rload1
C3

dIL dðVA8  VA9 Þ


VA2  VA8 ¼ L6  6 ; IC6 ¼ C6  ) VA8  VA9
Zdt dt
1 dIL
¼  IC6  dt; VA9 ¼ L4  4
C6 dt
Z
dVA9 1 dIL
IC5 ¼ C5  ) VA9 ¼  IC5  dt; VA9  VA10 ¼ L3  3
dt C5 dt
Z
dðVA10  VA11 Þ 1
IC4 ¼ C4  ) VA10  VA11 ¼  IC4  dt
dt C4

VA12 VA11
IRload2 ¼ ; VA11  VA12 ; IRload2 ¼ ) VA11 ¼ IRload2  Rload2
Rload2 Rload2

Vsin ! e; VA1 ! VA2 ; VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs ;


dIL dIL
VA3 ¼ VA2  L5  5 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  L5  5
dt dt
dIL5 dIL5 dIL
VA2  VA3 ¼ L5  ) VA3 ¼ VA2  L5  ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  L5  5
dt dt dt
700 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

Z Z
1 dIL5 1
VA3  VA4 ¼  IC  dt ) Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  L5    IC2  dt
C1 Z 1 dt C2
1
¼  IC1  dt
C1
Z Z
d dIL5 1 1
fVs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  L5    IC2  dt ¼  IC1  dtg
dt dt C2 C1

dVs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL 1 1


  R s  L5  2 5   I C2 ¼  I C1
dt dt dt C2 C1
Z Z
1 1
VA5  VA6 ¼  IC3  dt ) VA6 ¼ VA5   IC3  dt
C3 Z CZ3
1 dIL1 1
¼  IC2  dt  L1    IC3  dt
C2 dt C3

VA6
Vsout1 ! e; VA6 ! VA7 ; IRload1 ¼ ) VA6 ¼ IRload1  Rload1
Rload1
Z Z
1 dIL 1
 IC2  dt  L1  1   IC3  dt ¼ IRload1  Rload1 ;
C2 dt C3
1 d 2 IL 1 dIRload1
 I C 2  L1  2 1   I C3 ¼  Rload1
C2 dt C3 dt

dIL6 dIL dIL


VA2  VA8 ¼ L6  ) VA8 ¼ VA2  L6  6 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  L6  6
dt dt dt
Z Z
1 1
VA8  VA9 ¼  IC6  dt ) VA9 ¼ VA8   IC6  dt
C6 C6Z
dIL 1
¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  L6  6   IC6  dt
dt C6
Z
dIL4 1 dIL
VA9 ¼ L4  ; VA9 ¼  IC5  dt; L4  4 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs
dt C5 dt
Z
dIL6 1
 L6    IC6  dt
dt C6
d 2 IL dVs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL 1
L4  2 4 ¼   Rs  L6  2 6   I C6
dt dt dt dt C6
Z Z
1 dIL 1 1
 IC5  dt ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs  L6  6   IC6  dt;  I C5
C5 dt C6 C5
dVs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL 1
¼   R s  L6  2 6   I C6
dt dt dt C6
7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 701

dIL3 dIL dIL dIL


VA9  VA10 ¼ L3  ) VA10 ¼ VA9  L3  3 ¼ L4  4  L3  3 ;
dt dt dt dt
1 d 2 I L4
 I C5 ¼ L4  2
C5 dt
Z Z
1 1
VA10  VA11 ¼  IC4  dt ) VA11 ¼ VA10   IC4  dt
C4 C4
Z
dIL4 dIL3 1
¼ L4   L3    IC4  dt
dt dt C4

Vsout2 ! e; VA11 ! VA12 ; VA11 ¼ IRload2Z  Rload2 ; IRload2  Rload2


dIL4 dIL3 1
¼ L4   L3    IC4  dt
dt dt C4
Z
d dIL dIL 1 dIRload2
fIRload2  Rload2 ¼ L4  4  L3  3   IC4  dtg;  Rload2
dt dt dt C4 dt
d 2 IL d 2 IL 1
¼ L 4  2 4  L3  2 3   IC4
dt dt C4

Summary of our circuit differential equations (Version 1):

dVs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL 1 1 1 d 2 IL 1


  Rs  L5  2 5   I C2 ¼  IC1 ;  IC2  L1  2 1   I C3
dt dt dt C2 C1 C2 dt C3
dIRload1
¼  Rload1
dt

d 2 IL4 dVs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 I L6 1 1


L4  ¼   Rs  L 6    I C6 ;  I C5
dt2 dt dt dt2 C6 C5
dVs ðtÞ dIRs 2
d IL 1
¼   Rs  L6  2 6   I C6
dt dt dt C6

dIRload2 d 2 IL d 2 IL 1 1 d 2 IL
 Rload2 ¼ L4  2 4  L3  2 3   I C4 ;  IC5 ¼ L4  2 4
dt dt dt C4 C5 dt

Summary of our circuit differential equations (Version 2):

I C1 ! I L 5 ; I C6 ! I L 6 ; I L 1 ! I C3 ; I L 3 ! I C4

dVs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL 1 1 1 d 2 IC 1


  R s  L5  2 5   I C2 ¼  I L5 ;  IC2  L1  2 3   I C3
dt dt dt C2 C1 C2 dt C3
dIRload1
¼  Rload1
dt
702 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

1 dVs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL 1 1 d 2 IL


 I C5 ¼   Rs  L6  2 6   I L6 ;  IC5 ¼ L4  2 4
C5 dt dt dt C6 C5 dt
dIRload2 d 2 I L4 d 2 I C4 1
 Rload2 ¼ L4  2  L3  2   I C4
dt dt dt C4

Remark 1.0 IRs ðt  sin Þ ¼ IL5 þ IL6 ; IRload2 ¼ IC4 ðt  sout2 Þ; IRload1 ¼ IC3 ðt  sout1 Þ

dIRload2 dIC4 ðt  sout2 Þ


¼ ; IC4 ðt  sout2 Þ ¼ IC 4 þ iC4  ekt  eksout2 ; IC4 ðtÞ
dt dt
¼ IC 4 þ iC4  ekt

dIC4 ðt  sout2 Þ dIC4 ðtÞ dIC4 ðt  sout2 Þ


¼ iC4  k  ekt  eksout2 ; ¼ iC4  k  ekt ;
dt dt dt
dIC4 ðtÞ ksout2
¼ e
dt
dIRload1 dIC3 ðtsout1 Þ
Remark 1.1 dt ¼ dt ; IC3 ðt  sout1 Þ ¼ IC 3 þ iC3  ekt  eksout1 ; IC3 ðtÞ ¼
IC 3 þ iC3  ekt

dIC3 ðt  sout1 Þ dIC3 ðtÞ dIC3 ðt  sout1 Þ


¼ iC3  k  ekt  eksout1 ; ¼ iC3  k  ekt ;
dt dt dt
dIC3 ðtÞ ksout1
¼ e
dt
dIRload1 dIC3 ðt  sout1 Þ dIC3 ðtÞ ksout1
¼ ¼ e
dt dt dt
dIRs ðtsin Þ dIL5 dIL6
Remark 1.2 IRs ðt  sin Þ ¼ IL5 þ IL6 ; dt ¼ dt þ dt

dIRs ðt  sin Þ
IRs ðt  sin Þ ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekt  eksin ; IRs ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekt ;
dt
¼ iRs  k  ekt  eksin

dIRs ðtÞ dIRs ðt  sin Þ dIRs ðtÞ ksin dIRs ðtÞ ksin dIL5 dIL6
¼ iRs  k  ekt ; ¼ e ; e ¼ þ
dt dt dt dt dt dt

dIRs ðtÞ dIL5 ksin dIL6 ksin dIRload2 dIC4 ðt  sout2 Þ dIC4 ðtÞ ksout2
¼ e þ e ; ¼ ¼ e
dt dt dt dt dt dt

Summary of our circuit differential equations (Version 3):

dX2 d 2 IL5 dIL dX3 d 2 IC3 dIC3 dX4 d 2 IL6 dIL


¼ 2 ; X2 ¼ 5 ; ¼ 2
; X 3 ¼ ; ¼ 2 ; X4 ¼ 6
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt dt dt
7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 703

dX5 d 2 IL4 dIL dX6 d 2 IC4 dIC4 dIRs ðtÞ


¼ 2 ; X5 ¼ 4 ; ¼ 2
; X6 ¼ ; ¼ X2  eksin þ X4  eksin
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt

dVs ðtÞ dX2 1


 ½X2  eksin þ X4  eksin   Rs  L5    IC2
dt dt C2
1 1 dX3 1
¼  IL5 ;  I C 2  L1    IC3 ¼ X3  eksout1  Rload1
C1 C2 dt C3

1 dVs ðtÞ dX4 1 1


 I C5 ¼  ½X2  eksin þ X4  eksin   Rs  L6    I L6 ;  I C5
C5 dt dt C6 C5
dX5 dX5 1
¼ L4  ) ¼  I C5
dt dt C5  L4

dX5 dX6 1
X6  eksout2  Rload2 ¼ L4   L3    I C4
dt dt C4

1 dX6 1
X6  eksout2  Rload2 ¼ L4   I C 5  L3    I C4
C5  L4 dt C4

Summary of our circuit differential equations (Version 4):

dIL5 dIC dIL dIL dIC


¼ X2 ; 3 ¼ X3 ; 6 ¼ X4 ; 4 ¼ X5 ; 4 ¼ X6
dt dt dt dt dt
dX2 1 dVs ðtÞ Rs 1 1
¼   ½X2  eksin þ X4  eksin     IC2   IL
dt L5 dt L5 C2  L5 C1  L5 5
dX3 1 1 Rload1 dX5 1
¼  I C2   IC3  X3  eksout1  ; ¼  IC5
dt C2  L1 C3  L1 L1 dt C5  L4

dX2 1 dVs ðtÞ Rs 1 1


¼   ½X2  eksin þ X4  eksin     I C2   IL
dt L5 dt L5 C2  L5 C1  L5 5

dX3 1 1 Rload1 dX5 1


¼  I C2   IC3  X3  eksout1  ; ¼  IC5
dt C2  L1 C3  L1 L1 dt C5  L4
dVs ðtÞ
At fixed points (equilibrium points): dt !e

dIL5 ðiÞ dIC ðiÞ dIL ðiÞ dIL ðiÞ


¼ 0 ) X2 ¼ 0; 3 ¼ 0 ) X3 ¼ 0; 6 ¼ 0 ) X4 ¼ 0; 4 ¼ 0 ) X5 ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt

dIC4 ðiÞ dX2 dVs ðtÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ


¼ 0 ) X6 ¼ 0; ¼0)f ! eg  I  I ¼0
dt dt dt C2 C2 C1 L5
704 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dX3 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ dX5 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ


¼0) I   I ¼ 0; ¼0)  I ¼ 0 ) I C5 ¼ 0
dt C2 C2 C3 C3 dt C5  L4 C5

dX4 dVs ðtÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


¼0)f ! eg   I L6   I ¼ 0; IC5 ¼ 0 ) IL6 ¼ 0
dt dt C6 C5 C5

dX6 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


¼0) I   I ¼ 0; IC5 ¼ 0; IC4 ¼ 0; IL6 ¼ 0
dt C 5 C5 C 4 C4

We can summery our system fixed points:

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


Xk ¼ 0; IC5 ¼ 0; IC4 ¼ 0; IL6 ¼ 0
8k¼2;3;4;5;6

1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ


I þ  I ¼ 0; I  I ¼0
C 2 C2 C 1 L 5 C2 C2 C3 C3

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of dual band diplexer filter circuit consists in adding to its
coordinated [X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 IL5 IC3 IL6 IL4 IC4 IC2 IC5 ] arbitrarily small increments
of exponential terms ½x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 iL5 iC3 iL6 iL4 iC4 iC2 iC5   ekt , and retaining the
first order terms in x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 iL5 iC3 iL6 iL4 iC4 iC2 iC5 . The system of ten ho-
mogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigen-
valuek. The polynomial characteristic equation accepts by set the dual band
diplexer filter circuit equations. The dual band diplexer filter circuit fixed values
with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 iL5 iC3 iL6
iL4 iC4 iC2 iC5   ekt are; i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2
(third fixed point), etc., [2–4].
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x2  ekt ; X3 ðtÞ ¼ X3 þ x3  ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X4 ðtÞ ¼ X4 þ x4  ekt ; X5 ðtÞ ¼ X5 þ x5  ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X6 ðtÞ ¼ X6 þ x6  ekt ; IL5 ðtÞ ¼ IL5 þ iL5  ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
IC3 ðtÞ ¼ IC3 þ iC3  ekt ; IL6 ðtÞ ¼ IL6 þ iL6  ekt

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


IL4 ðtÞ ¼ IL4 þ iL4  ekt ; IC4 ðtÞ ¼ IC4 þ iC4  ekt ; IC2 ðtÞ ¼ IC2 þ iC2  ekt ; IC5 ðtÞ
ðiÞ
¼ IC5 þ iC5  ekt

dX2 ðtÞ dX3 ðtÞ dX4 ðtÞ dX5 ðtÞ


¼ x2  k  ekt ; ¼ x3  k  ekt ; ¼ x4  k  ekt ; ¼ x5  k  ekt
dt dt dt dt

dX6 ðtÞ dIL ðtÞ dIC ðtÞ dIL ðtÞ


¼ x6  k  ekt ; 5 ¼ iL5  k  ekt ; 3 ¼ iC3  k  ekt ; 6
dt dt dt dt
¼ iL6  k  ekt
7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 705

dIL4 ðtÞ dIC ðtÞ


¼ iL4  k  ekt ; 4 ¼ iC4  k  ekt
dt dt
For k < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 unstable.
Our dual band diplexer filter circuit tends to the selected fixed point exponentially
for k < 0, t > 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is
the eigenvalue parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or unstable,
additionally his absolute value |k| establish the speed of flow toward or away from
the selected fixed point [4].
dIL5 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X2 ) iL5  k  ekt ¼ X2 þ x2  ekt ; X2 ¼ 0; iL5  k þ x2 ¼ 0
dt
dIC3 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X3 ) iC3  k  ekt ¼ X3 þ x3  ekt ; X3 ¼ 0; iC3  k þ x3 ¼ 0
dt
dIL6 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X4 ) iL6  k  ekt ¼ X4 þ x4  ekt ; X4 ¼ 0; iL6  k þ x4 ¼ 0
dt
dIL4 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X5 ) iL4  k  ekt ¼ X5 þ x5  ekt ; X5 ¼ 0; iL4  k þ x5 ¼ 0
dt
dIC4 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X6 ) iC4  k  ekt ¼ X6 þ x6  ekt ; X6 ¼ 0; iC4  k þ x6 ¼ 0
dt
dX2 Rs 1 1
¼ ½X2 þ X4   eksin    I C2   IL
dt L5 C2  L5 C1  L5 5

ðiÞ ðiÞ Rs 1 ðiÞ


x2  k  ekt ¼ ½X2 þ x2  ekt þ X4 þ x4  ekt   eksin    ½I þ iC2  ekt 
L5 C2  L5 C2
1 ðiÞ
  ½I þ iL5  ekt 
C1  L5 L5

ðiÞ ðiÞ Rs 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ


x2  k  ekt ¼ ½X2 þ X4   eksin   I   I  ½x2  ekt þ x4  ekt 
L5 C2  L5 C2 C1  L5 L5
Rs 1 1
 eksin    iC2  ekt   iL  ekt
L5 C2  L5 C1  L5 5

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


At fixed points: ½X2 þ X4   eksin  LR5s  C21L5  IC2  C11L5  IL5 ¼ 0

Rs 1 1
x2  k  ekt ¼ ½x2  ekt þ x4  ekt   eksin    iC2  ekt   iL  ekt
L5 C2  L5 C1  L5 5

Rs Rs 1 1
x2  k  x2  eksin   x4  eksin    i C2   iL ¼ 0
L5 L5 C2  L5 C1  L5 5
706 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dX3 1 1 Rload1
¼  I C2   IC3  X3  eksout1 
dt C2  L1 C3  L1 L1

1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ


x3  k  ekt ¼  ½IC2 þ iC2  ekt    ½I þ iC3  ekt   ½X3 þ x3  ekt 
C2  L1 C3  L1 C3
Rload1
 eksout1 
L1

1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ Rload1 1


x3  k  ekt ¼  I C2   IC3  X3  eksout1  þ  iC2  ekt
C2  L1 C3  L1 L1 C2  L1
1 Rload1
  iC3  ekt  x3  ekt  eksout1 
C3  L1 L1

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


At fixed points: 1
C2 L1  IC2  C31L1  IC3  X3  eksout1  Rload1
L1 ¼ 0

1 1 Rload1
x3  k  ekt ¼  iC2  ekt   iC3  ekt  x3  ekt  eksout1 
C2  L1 C3  L1 L1

1 1 Rload1
x3  k þ  iC2   iC3  x3  eksout1  ¼0
C2  L1 C3  L1 L1

dX5 1 1 ðiÞ
¼  IC5 ) x5  k  ekt ¼  ½I þ iC5  ekt ; x5  k  ekt
dt C5  L4 C5  L4 C5
1 ðiÞ 1
¼  I C5 þ  iC5  ekt
C5  L4 C5  L4
ðiÞ
At fixed points: 1
C5 L4  IC5 ¼ 0; x5  k þ 1
C5 L4  iC5 ¼ 0

dX4 1 dVs ðtÞ Rs 1 1


¼   ½X2  eksin þ X4  eksin     IL   I C5
dt L6 dt L6 C6  L6 6 C5  L6

1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ Rs


x4  k  ekt ¼   ½X2 þ x2  ekt þ X4 þ x4  ekt    eksin
L6 dt L6
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
  ½I þ iL6  ekt    ½I þ iC5  ekt 
C6  L6 L6 C5  L6 C5

1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ Rs 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ


x4  k  ekt ¼   ½X2 þ X4    eksin  I  I
L6 dt L6 C6  L6 L6 C5  L6 C5
Rs 1 1
 ½x2  ekt þ x4  ekt    eksin   iL  ekt   iC5  ekt
L6 C6  L6 6 C5  L6
7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 707

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


At fixed points: 1
L6  fdVdts ðtÞ ! eg  ½X2 þ X4   LR6s  eksin  C61L6  IL6  C51L6 
ðiÞ
I C5 ¼ 0

Rs ksin 1 1
x4  k  ekt ¼ ½x2  ekt þ x4  ekt   e   iL  ekt   iC5  ekt
L6 C6  L6 6 C5  L6

Rs ksin Rs 1 1
x4  k  x2  e  x4   eksin   iL   i C5 ¼ 0
L6 L6 C6  L6 6 C5  L6

dX6 1 1 Rload2
¼  I C5   IC4  X6  eksout2 
dt C5  L3 C4  L3 L3

1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ


x6  k  ekt ¼  ½IC5 þ iC5  ekt    ½I þ iC4  ekt   ½X6 þ x6  ekt 
C5  L3 C4  L3 C4
Rload2
 eksout2 
L3

1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ Rload2 1


x6  k  ekt ¼ I   I  X6  eksout2  þ  iC5  ekt
C5  L3 C5 C4  L3 C4 L3 C5  L3
1 Rload2
  iC4  ekt  x6  ekt  eksout2 
C4  L3 L3

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


At fixed points: 1
C5 L3  IC5  C41L3  IC4  X6  eksout2  Rload2
L3 ¼ 0

1 1 Rload2
x6  k  ekt ¼  iC5  ekt   iC4  ekt  x6  ekt  eksout2 
C5  L3 C4  L3 L3

1 1 Rload2
x6  k þ  iC5   iC4  x6  eksout2  ¼0
C5  L3 C4  L3 L3
We can summery our dual band diplexer filter circuit arbitrarily small increments
equations:

iL5  k þ x2 ¼ 0; iC3  k þ x3 ¼ 0; iL6  k þ x4 ¼ 0; iL4  k þ x5


¼ 0; iC4  k þ x6 ¼ 0

Rs Rs 1 1
x2  k  x2  eksin   x4  eksin    i C2   iL ¼ 0
L5 L5 C2  L5 C1  L5 5

1 1 Rload1
x3  k þ  i C2   iC3  x3  eksout1 
C2  L1 C3  L1 L1
1
¼ 0; x5  k þ  iC5 ¼ 0
C5  L4
708 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
Rs ksin Rs 1 1
x4  k  x2  e  x4   eksin   iL   i C5 ¼ 0
L6 L6 C6  L6 6 C5  L6

1 1 Rload2
x6  k þ  iC5   iC4  x6  eksout2  ¼0
C5  L3 C4  L3 L3
0 1 0 1
iL5 !11 !12
B C B ! !22 C
B iC3 C B 21
C
B C B
B iL C B !31 !32 C C
B 6C B C
B C B ! ! C
0 B
1 B iL4 C BC 41 42 C !
N11 . . . N1 10 Bi C B B ! ! C
C
B .. .. .. C  B C5 C þ B 51 52
C
i C2
@ . . . A B C
B x2 C B !61 !62 C
N10 1    N10 10 B C B C i C5
B x C B B ! ! C
C
B 3C B 71 72
C
B C B ! !82 C
B x4 C B 81 C
B C B C
B x C @ !91 ! A
@ 5A 92

x6 ! 10 1 ! 10 2
1
¼ 0; !kl ; !61 ¼  ; !62 ¼ 0
8 k¼1;2;3;4;5;l¼1;2 C2  L5

1 1
!71 ¼ ; !72 ¼ 0; !81 ¼ 0; !82 ¼  ; !91 ¼ 0; !92
C2  L1 C5  L6
1 1
¼ ; !10 1 ¼ 0; !10 2 ¼
C5  L4 C5  L3

Assumption
0 1 0 1
!11  12 i L5
B !21  22 C B C
B C B i C3 C
B ! B C
B  32 C
C B iL C
B
31
C B 6C
B !41  42 C B C
B C 0 1 B i L4 C
B  ! N11 ... N1 B C
B  52 C
C i C2 B
10 B C
C B i C5 C
B
51
C ! e; @ .. .. ..
B !61  62 C . . . AB C0
B C i C5 B x2 C
B ! N10  N10 B C
B 71  72 C
C 1 10 B x C
B 3C
B C B C
B !81  82 C B x4 C
B C B C
B !  92 C B x C
@ 91 A @ 5A
!10 1  10 2 x6
i C2
Arbitrarily small increments iC2 ; iC5 are very small and ð Þ ! e.
i C5
7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 709

N11 ¼ k; N12 ¼ . . . ¼ N15 ¼ 0; N16 ¼ 1; N17 ¼ . . .N1 10 ¼ 0; N21 ¼ 0; N22


¼ k

N23 ¼ . . .N26 ¼ 0; N27 ¼ 1; N28 ¼ N29 ¼ N2 10 ¼ 0; N31 ¼ N32 ¼ 0; N33 ¼ k

N34 ¼ . . .N37 ¼ 0; N38 ¼ 1; N39 ¼ N3 10 ¼ 0; N41 ¼ N42 ¼ N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k

N45 ¼ . . . ¼ N48 ¼ 0; N49 ¼ 1; N4 10 ¼ 0; N51 ¼ . . . ¼ N54 ¼ 0; N55 ¼ k; N56


¼ . . .N59 ¼ 0

1
N5 10 ¼ 1; N61 ¼  ; N62 ¼ 0; N63 ¼ N64 ¼ N65 ¼ 0; N66
C1  L5
Rs
¼ k  eksin 
L5

Rs 1
N67 ¼ 0; N68 ¼ eksin  ; N69 ¼ 0; N6 10 ¼ 0; N71 ¼ 0; N72 ¼  ; N73
L5 C3  L1
¼0

Rload1
N74 ¼ N75 ¼ 0; N76 ¼ 0; N77 ¼ k  eksout1  ; N78 ¼ N79 ¼ N7 10 ¼0
L1

1 Rs
N81 ¼ N82 ¼ 0; N83 ¼  ; N84 ¼ N85 ¼ 0; N86 ¼   eksin ; N87 ¼ 0
C6  L6 L6

Rs ksin
N88 ¼ k   e ; N89 ¼ N8 10 ¼ 0; N91 ¼ . . . ¼ N98 ¼ 0; N99 ¼ k; N9 10
L6
¼0

1
N10 1 ¼ N10 2 ¼ N10 3 ¼ N10 4 ¼ 0; N10 5 ¼ ; N10 6 ¼ . . . ¼ N10 9
C4  L3
¼0

Rload2
N10 10 ¼ k  eksout2 
L3

We analyze dual band diplexer filter circuit for the following cases:
710 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

Table 7.2 Dual band diplexer filter circuit for cases of sin, sout1, sout2
Case no. sin sout1 sout2
1 0 0 0
2 s 0 0
3 0 s 0
4 0 0 s
5 s s 0
6 0 s s
7 s 0 s
8 s s s

Case No. 1: sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0; N66 ¼ k  LR5s ; N68 ¼  LR5s .

Rload1 Rs Rs Rload2
N77 ¼ k  ; N86 ¼  ; N88 ¼ k  ; N10 10 ¼ k 
L1 L6 L6 L3

X
10 X
10
detðA  k  IÞj sin ¼0 ¼ !k  kk ; detðA  k  IÞj sin ¼0 ¼ 0 ) !k  kk j sin ¼0
sout1 ¼0 sout1 ¼0 sout1 ¼0
sout2 ¼0 k¼0 sout2 ¼0 k¼0 sout2 ¼0

¼0

Remark It is reader exercise to find above polynomial parameters !1 ; . . .; !10 .


Eigenvalues stability discussion: Our dual band diplexer filter circuit involving
N variables (N > 2, N = 10), the characteristic equation is of degree N = 10 and
must often be solved numerically. Expect in some particular cases, such an equation
has (N = 10) distinct roots that can be real or complex. These values are the
eigenvalues of the 10  10 Jacobian matrix (A). The general rule is that the Steady
State (SS) is stable if there is no eigenvalue with positive real part. It is sufficient
that one eigenvalue is positive for the steady state to be unstable. Our 10-variables
(X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 IL5 IC3 IL6 IL4 IC4 ) dual band diplexer filter circuit has ten eigen-
values. The type of behavior can be characterized as a function of the position of
these eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be distin-
guished: (1) the ten eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), (2) the
ten eigenvalues are real, nine of them are negative (unstable steady state), (3) and
(4) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and the other
eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), two cases can be distin-
guished depending on the relative value of the real part of the complex eigenvalues
and of the real one, (5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real
part and at least one eigenvalue is positive (unstable steady state).
Remark It is reader exercise to analyze dual band diplexer filter circuit stability for
cases 2 to 8 (at least one delay parameter sin ; sout1 ; sout2 is positive and real number).
The stability analysis is done by using geometric stability switch criteria in delay
7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 711

differential systems (E. Beretta and Y. Kuang). It is a practical guideline that


combines graphical information with analytical work to effectively study the local
stability of dual band diplexer filter circuit model involving delay dependent
parameters. The stability of dual band diplexer filter circuit steady state is deter-
mined by the graphs of some functions of s which can be expressed explicitly [5, 6].
The general geometric criterion: The occurrence of any possible stability
switching resulting from the increase of value of the time delay s for our dual band
diplexer filter circuit characteristic equation.

Dðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ ¼ detðA  k  IÞ; Dðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ ¼ 0; Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks
Xn X
m
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ  kk ; Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ; n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m
k¼0 k¼0

pk ð Þ; qk ð Þ : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable functions of s.

Pn ðk ¼ 0; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ 0; sÞ ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ q0 ðsÞ 6¼ 0 8 s 2 R þ 0

Pn ðk; sÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s for which we
assume:
(I) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R then Pn ði  x; sÞ þ Qm ði  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R.
(II) lim supfjQm ðk; sÞ=Pn ðk; sÞj : jkj ! 1; Rek
0g\1 for any s.
(III) Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPn ði  x; sÞj2  jQm ði  x; sÞj2 for each s has at most a finite
number of real zeros.
(IV) Each positive root xðsÞ of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable in s
whenever it exists.

7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis

We use crystal in place of LC filter for low frequency applications. It is emphasis in


narrow bandwidth filtering. Crystals have a series and parallel resonant mode. Other
crystal mode is overtone or harmonic mode. There are lattice crystal filter, half
latticex and cascaded half lattice filters. The bandwidth of these filters is a function
of the frequency separation of the crystals. Another form of filter is the ladder
crystal filter. It has an asymmetrical response and it is called the “lower-sideband
ladder“ configuration. Ladder filters have some advantages: no need to pick crystals
for proper frequency separation, no need to match crystal pairs, simple filter
topology, simple construction methods, no adjustable components are required after
alignment is completed, benefits by the absence of coils, compact assembly, high
712 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

number of poles, and shape the filter response with great accuracy. The equivalent
circuit of a quartz crystal is describe in the below figure.
We need to measure the crystal parameters. The important parameters in our design
are: DF—frequency offset or deviation from the specific center frequency, r—series
resistance of the crystal, fL and fH—3 dB points required for the Q calculation, Lm—
motional inductance which is derived from the Q and r, Cp—parallel capacitance of the
crystal’s holder, Cm—motional capacitance. In our design the crystals can be matched
for Q, Lm and DF. Several factors influence the choice of bandwidth of a crystal filter:
the desired selectivity (narrow filters for contest work and wider filters for casual
rag-chewing), receiver sensitivity, dynamic range, and personal preference. The value
of the terminating resistance should be as low as possible to minimize the transfor-
mation ratio of the impedance matching transformers. The crystal can be forced to
resonate efficiency at odd harmonic intervals of its fundamental frequency. The
overtone modes force a crystal filter to have undesired reentrance modes (odd multiples
of the series resonant frequency). Crystals can be in larger combinations, within RF
filter packages. The crystal lattice filters contain several crystals within a single circuit
(adopted for use as a very sharp bandpass filter). The input and outputs employ RF
transformers (T1 and T2) with shunt capacitors (C1 and C2). Each set of crystals
XTAL1 plus XTAL2 and XTAL3 plus XTAL4 are cut to different frequencies. The
matched set of XTAL1 and XTAL2 having a lower resonant frequency than the other

Fig. 7.6 Equivalent circuit of a quartz crystal


7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 713

Fig. 7.7 Lattice crystal filter

matched set of XTAL3 and XTAL4. This structure circuit attains the desired band-
width and selectivity [107, 108].

Terminology: ip1 -input current to transformer T1’s primary coil, is1 -input current
to transformer T1’s secondary coil, ip2 -input current to transformer T2’s primary
coil, is2 -input current to transformer T2’s secondary coil
Transformer T1: vp1—transformer primary voltage, vs1—transformer secondary
voltage. /1 is the flux through a one turn coil located anywhere on the transformer
core. np1 and ns1 are the number of turns of the coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary),
respectively, then the total flux /p1 and /s1 through coils 1 and 2 respectively are
d/p1 d/s1
/p1 ¼ np1  /1 ; /s1 ¼ ns1  /; vp1 ¼ dt ; vs1 ¼ dt ; vp1 ¼ np1  dt
d/1

v ðtÞ n n v ðtÞ n p1
vs1 ¼ ns1  d/
dt ; vp1 ðtÞ ¼ vp1 ; vs1 ðtÞ ¼
1
vs1 ; vps1 ðtÞ ¼ nps1 ; a1 ¼ nps1 . vps1 ðtÞ ¼ n s1 for all
1 1 1 1
times t and for all voltages vp1 and vs1 . We define the ratio between np1 and ns1 as
n
“a1” (a1 ¼ nps1 ). Step down transformer a1 > 1 and step up transformer a1 < 1. By
1
law of conservation of energy, apparent real and reactive powers are each conserved
in the input and output (S1 ¼ Ip1  vp1 ¼ Is1  vs1 ). Ideal transformer identity:
qffiffiffiffiffi
v p1 I s1 np1 L p1
vs ¼ Ip ¼ ns ¼ Ls ¼ a 1 :
1 1 1 1

vp1 n1 n2 n2
np1 ¼ n1 ; ns1 ¼ n2 ; ¼ ; n1 ; n2 [ 1 ) vs1 ¼ vp1  ¼ VA1 
vs1 n2 n1 n1
n2
¼ ½Vs ðtÞ  Rs  IRs  
n1
714 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

vs1 ¼ VA1  nn21 ; vp1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  Rs  IRs ; vs1 ¼ ½Vs ðtÞ  Rs  IRs   nn21 (Reference direc-
tions are in the top of each transformer’s coil). np1  ip1 þ ns1  is1 ¼ 0; ip1 ¼ ip1 ðtÞ;
i ðtÞ n
is1 ¼ is1 ðtÞ; ips1 ðtÞ ¼  nps1
1 1
For all t and all currents ip1 and is1 . The voltage vp1 across coil 1 does not depend
on ip1 or on is1 ; it depends only on vs1 . Similarly the current ip1 depends only on is1
and is independent of vp1 ; vs1 . vs1 ¼ VA2  VA9
Transformer T2: vp2—transformer primary voltage, vs2—transformer secondary
voltage. /2 is the flux through a one turn coil located anywhere on the transformer
core. np2 and ns2 are the number of turns of the coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary),
respectively, then the total flux /p2 and /s2 through coils 1 and 2 respectively are

d/p2 d/ d/
/p2 ¼ np2  /2 ; /s2 ¼ ns2  /; vp2 ¼ ; vs2 ¼ s2 ; vp2 ¼ np2  2
dt dt dt
d/2 vp ðtÞ np np
vs2 ¼ ns2  ; vp2 ðtÞ ¼ vp2 ; vs2 ðtÞ ¼ vs2 ; 2 ¼ 2 ; a2 ¼ 2 :
dt vs2 ðtÞ ns2 ns 2

vp2 ðtÞ np2


vs2 ðtÞ ¼ ns2 for all times t and for all voltages vp2 and vs2 . We define the ratio
n p2
between np2 and ns2 as “a2” (a2 ¼ ns2 ). Step down transformer a2 > 1 and step up
transformer a2 < 1. By law of conservation of energy, apparent real and reactive
powers are each conserved in the input and output (S2 ¼ Ip2  vp2 ¼ Is2  vs2 ). Ideal
qffiffiffiffiffi
v I n L
transformer identity: vps2 ¼ Ips2 ¼ nps2 ¼ Lps2 ¼ a2 .
2 2 2 2

vs2 ¼ VA14 ¼ IRload  Rload


v p 2 n3 n4 n4
np 2 ¼ n3 ; ns 2 ¼ n4 ; ¼ ; n3 ; n4 [ 1 ) vs2 ¼ vp2  ¼ ½VA6  VA3  
v s 2 n4 n3 n3

vs2 ¼ ½VA6  VA3   nn43 ; vp2 ¼ VA6  VA3 ; vs2 ¼ vp2  nn43 (Reference directions are in
the top of each transformer’s coil). np2  ip2 þ ns2  is2 ¼ 0; ip2 ¼ ip2 ðtÞ; is2 ¼ is2 ðtÞ;
ip2 ðtÞ n
is2 ðtÞ ¼  nps2 .
2
For all t and all currents ip2 and is2 . The voltage vp2 across coil 1 does not depend
on ip2 or on is2 ; it depends only on vs2 . Similarly the current ip2 depends only on is2
and is independent of vp2 ; vs2 . We consider for two transformers a1 6¼ a2 [24].
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 715

Fig. 7.8 Lattice crystal filter equivalent circuit

Remark When we have two coils of wire in close physical proximity to one
another, no importance whether or not the coils are wrapped around a common core
of magnetic material. We assume that the coils do not move with respect to one
another or with respect to a core they might be wrapped around. If we have some
ferromagnetic material in the magnetic circuit of the two coils, then when the
current sufficiently large, the relation between the fluxes /p ; /s and the currents
ip ; is are no longer linear. In this case the equations have the following form:
/p ¼ fp ðip ; is Þ; /s ¼ fs ðip ; is Þ, where fp ðip ; is Þ; fs ðip ; is Þ are nonlinear functions of the
currents ip ; is , By Faraday’s law we get the following:

d/p @fp dip @fp dis


vp ¼ ¼  þ  ; fp ¼ fp ðip ; is Þ; fs ¼ fs ðip ; is Þ
dt @ip dt @is dt

d/s @fs dip @fs dis


vs ¼ ¼  þ  ; fp ¼ fp ðip ; is Þ; fs ¼ fs ðip ; is Þ
dt @ip dt @is dt
@f @f@fs @fs
The four partial derivatives (@ipp ; @ips ; @i ; ) are function of ip ; is . It is applicable
p @is

for the first transformer (T1) and the second transformer (T2) in our Lattice crystal
filter circuit.
716 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

Ir1 ¼ ICm1 ¼ ILm1 ; Ir2 ¼ ICm2 ¼ ILm2 ; Ir3 ¼ ICm3 ¼ ILm3 ;


Ir4 ¼ ICm4 ¼ ILm4 ; Irk ¼ ICmk ¼ ILmk 8 k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4
dðVA9  VA2 Þ dðVA3  VA6 Þ
IRload ¼ is2 ; IRs ¼ ip1 ; IC1 ¼ C1  ; IC2 ¼ C2  ;
dt dt
dðVA3  VA2 Þ VA  VA2 dðVA5  VA4 Þ
ICp3 ¼ Cp3  Ir3 ¼ 4 ; ICm3 ¼ Cm3  ;
dt r3 dt
dILm3 dðVA6  VA2 Þ
VA3  VA5 ¼ Lm3  ; ICp1 ¼ Cp1 
dt dt

VA7  VA2 dðVA8  VA7 Þ dILm1


Ir1 ¼ ; ICm1 ¼ Cm1  ; VA6  VA8 ¼ Lm1  ; I Cp2
r1 dt dt
dðVA9  VA3 Þ
¼ Cp2 
dt

VA9  VA10 dðVA10  VA11 Þ dILm2


Ir2 ¼ ; ICm2 ¼ Cm2  ; VA11  VA3 ¼ Lm2  ; I Cp4
r2 dt dt
dðVA9  VA6 Þ
¼ Cp4 
dt
VA9  VA13 dðVA13  VA12 Þ dIL
Ir 4 ¼ ; ICm 4 ¼ Cm4  ; VA12  VA6 ¼ Lm4  m 4
r4 dt dt

vs 2 ¼ VA14 ¼ IRload  Rload ; vs1 ¼ VA2  VA9 ; vp2 ¼ VA6  VA3 ; vp1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ  IRs  Rs

KCL @ A2: ICp3 þ Ir3 þ ICp1 þ Ir1 þ IC1 ¼ is1 ; KCL @ A9:
is1 ¼ IC1 þ ICp2 þ Ir2 þ ICp4 þ Ir4
KCL @ A 3: ICp3 þ ILm3 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp2 þ ILm2 KCL @ A6:
ICp4 þ ILm4 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp1 þ ILm1
Z
dðVA3  VA6 Þ 1 dðVA9  VA2 Þ
IC2 ¼ C2  ) VA3  VA6 ¼  IC2  dt; IC1 ¼ C1 
dt Z C2 dt
1
) VA9  VA2 ¼  IC1  dt
C1
Z
dðVA3  VA2 Þ 1 VA4  VA2
ICp3 ¼ Cp3  ) VA3  VA2 ¼  ICp3  dt; Ir3 ¼
dt Cp3 r3
) VA4  VA2 ¼ Ir3  r3
Z
dðVA5  VA4 Þ 1
ICm3 ¼ Cm3  ) VA5  VA4 ¼  ICm3  dt; VA3  VA5
dt Cm3
dILm3
¼ Lm3 
dt
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 717

Z
dðVA6  VA2 Þ 1 VA7  VA2
I Cp1 ¼ Cp1  ) VA6  VA2 ¼  ICp1  dt; Ir1 ¼
dt Cp1 r1
) VA7  VA2 ¼ Ir1  r1
Z
dðVA8  VA7 Þ 1
ICm1 ¼ Cm1  ) VA8  VA7 ¼  ICm1  dt; VA6  VA8
dt Cm1
dILm1
¼ Lm1 
dt
Z
dðVA9  VA3 Þ 1
ICp2 ¼ Cp2  ) VA9  VA3 ¼  ICp2  dt;
dt Cp2
VA  VA10
Ir2 ¼ 9 ) VA9  VA10 ¼ Ir2  r2
r2
Z
dðVA10  VA11 Þ 1
ICm2 ¼ Cm2  ) VA10  VA11 ¼  ICm2  dt;
dt Cm2
dILm2
VA11  VA3 ¼ Lm2 
dt
Z
dðVA9  VA6 Þ 1 VA  VA13
ICp4 ¼ Cp4  ) VA9  VA6 ¼  ICp4  dt; Ir4 ¼ 9 ) VA9  VA13 ¼ Ir4  r4
dt Cp4 r4
Z
dðVA13  VA12 Þ 1 dILm4
ICm4 ¼ Cm4  ) VA13  VA12 ¼  ICm4  dt; VA12  VA6 ¼ Lm4 
dt Cm 4 dt

Lattice crystal filter differential equations group No. 1:


Z Z
1 1
VA9  VA2 ¼  IC1  dt; VA3  VA6 ¼  IC2  dt; VA3  VA2
C1 Z C2
1
¼  ICp 3  dt
Cp3
Z Z
1 1
VA5  VA4 ¼  ICm 3  dt; VA6  VA2 ¼  ICp 1  dt; VA8  VA7
Cm3 Z Cp1
1
¼  ICm 1  dt
Cm1
Z Z
1 1
VA9  VA3 ¼  IC  dt; VA10  VA11 ¼  ICm 2  dt; VA9  VA6
Cp2 Z p 2 Cm2
1
¼  ICp 4  dt
Cp4
Z
1
VA13  VA12 ¼  ICm 4  dt; VA4  VA2 ¼ Ir3  r3 ; VA3  VA5
Cm4
dIL
¼ Lm3  m 3 ; VA7  VA2 ¼ Ir1  r1
dt
718 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dILm 1 dIL
VA6  VA8 ¼ Lm1  ; VA9  VA10 ¼ Ir2  r2 ; VA11  VA3 ¼ Lm2  m 2 ; VA9  VA13
dt dt
¼ Ir 4  r4

dILm 4
VA12  VA6 ¼ Lm4 
dt

&&&
Z Z
1 1
VA9  VA2 ¼  IC1  dt ) VA2 ¼ VA9   IC1  dt
C1 C1
Z Z
1 1
VA3  VA2 ¼  ICp 3  dt ) VA3 ¼ VA2 þ  ICp 3  dt
Cp3 Cp3
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA3 ¼ VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp 3  dt; VA6  VA2 ¼  ICp 1  dt
C1 Cp 3 Cp1
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA6 ¼ VA2 þ  ICp 1  dt ¼ VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp 1  dt
Cp 1 C1 Cp 1
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA3  VA6 ¼  IC2  dt )  ICp 3  dt   ICp 1  dt
C2 Z Cp 3 Cp1
1
¼  IC2  dt
C2
Z Z Z
d 1 1 1 1 1
f  ICp 3  dt   ICp 1  dt ¼  IC2  dtg )  ICp 3   I Cp 1
dt Cp3 Cp 1 C2 Cp3 Cp 1
1
¼  I C2
C2
Z Z
1 1
VA9  VA3 ¼  ICp2  dt ) VA9 ¼ VA3 þ  ICp2  dt
Cp2 Cp2
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA9 ¼ VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp3  dt þ  ICp2  dt
C1 Cp3 Cp2
Z Z Z
1 1 1
  IC1  dt þ  ICp3  dt þ  ICp2  dt ¼ 0
C1 Cp3 Cp2
Z Z Z
d 1 1 1 1
f  IC1  dt þ  ICp3  dt þ  ICp2  dt ¼ 0g;  IC1
dt C1 Cp3 Cp2 C1
1 1
¼  I Cp3 þ  I Cp2
Cp3 Cp2
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 719

Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA9  VA6 ¼  IC  dt )  IC1  dt   ICp1  dt
Cp4 Z p4 C1 Cp1
1
¼  ICp4  dt
Cp4
Z Z Z
d 1 1 1 1 1
f  IC1  dt   ICp1  dt ¼  ICp4  dtg )  IC1   I Cp1
dt C1 Cp1 Cp4 C1 Cp1
1
¼  I Cp4
Cp4
Z
1
VA4  VA2 ¼ Ir3  r3 ) VA4 ¼ VA2 þ Ir3  r3 ¼ VA9   IC1  dt þ Ir3  r3
C1

dILm3 dILm3
VA3  VA5 ¼ Lm3  ) VA5 ¼ VA3  Lm3 
dt dt
Z Z
1 1 dILm3
¼ VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp3  dt  Lm3 
C1 Cp3 dt
Z
1
VA7  VA2 ¼ Ir1  r1 ) VA7 ¼ VA2 þ Ir1  r1 ¼ VA9   IC1  dt þ Ir1  r1
C1

dILm1 dILm1
VA6  VA8 ¼ Lm1  ) VA8 ¼ VA6  Lm1 
dt dt
Z Z
1 1 dILm1
¼ VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp1  dt  Lm1 
C1 Cp1 dt
VA9  VA10 ¼ Ir2  r2 ) VA10 ¼ VA9  Ir2  r2 ;
dILm2 dILm2
VA11  VA3 ¼ Lm2  ) VA11 ¼ VA3 þ Lm2 
dt dt
Z Z
1 1 dILm2
VA11 ¼ VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp3  dt þ Lm2  ;
C1 Cp3 dt
VA9  VA13 ¼ Ir4  r4 ) VA13 ¼ VA9  Ir4  r4
dILm4 dILm4
VA12  VA6 ¼ Lm4  ) VA12 ¼ VA6 þ Lm4 
dt dt
Z Z
1 1 dILm4
¼ VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp1  dt þ Lm4 
C1 Cp1 dt
Remark A
Z Z
1 1 dILm3
VA5  VA4 ¼  ICm3  dt;  ICp3  dt  Lm3   Ir3  r3
Cm3 Z Cp3 dt
1
¼  ICm3  dt
Cm3
720 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

Z Z
1 1 dILm3
VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp3  dt  Lm3 
C1 Z Cp3 dt
1
 ½VA9   IC1  dt þ Ir3  r3 
Z C1
1
¼  ICm3  dt
Cm3
Z Z
d 1 dILm3 1
f  ICp3  dt  Lm3   Ir 3  r3 ¼  ICm3  dtg
dt Cp3 dt Cm3
1 d 2 ILm3 dIr3 1
)  I C p 3  Lm 3    r3 ¼  ICm3
Cp3 dt2 dt Cm3

Remark B
Z Z
1 1 dILm1
VA8  VA7 ¼  ICm1  dt;  ICp1  dt  Lm1   Ir1  r1
Cm1 Z Cp1 dt
1
¼  ICm1  dt
Cm1
Z Z
1 1 dILm1
VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp1  dt  Lm1 
C1 Z Cp1 dt
1
 ½VA9   IC1  dt þ Ir1  r1 
Z C1
1
¼  ICm1  dt
Cm1
Z Z
d 1 dILm1 1
f  ICp1  dt  Lm1   Ir 1  r1 ¼  ICm1  dtg
dt Cp1 dt Cm1
1 d 2 ILm1 dIr1 1
)  I C p 1  Lm 1    r1 ¼  ICm1
Cp1 dt2 dt Cm1

Remark C
Z
1 dIr 1 1 d 2 ILm2
VA10  VA11 ¼  ICm2  dt;  2  r2 þ  I C1   I C p 3  Lm 2 
Cm2 dt C1 Cp3 dt2
1
¼  ICm2
Cm2
Z Z
1 1 dILm2
VA9  Ir2  r2  ½VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp3  dt þ Lm2  
Z C1 Cp3 dt
1
¼  ICm2  dt
Cm2
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 721

Z Z Z
1 1 dILm2 1
Ir2  r2 þ  I C1  dt   ICp3  dt  Lm2  ¼  ICm2  dt
C1 Cp3 dt Cm2
Z Z Z
d 1 1 dILm2 1
fIr2  r2 þ  IC1  dt   ICp3  dt  Lm2  ¼  ICm2  dtg
dt C1 Cp3 dt Cm2

dIr2 1 1 d 2 ILm2 1
  r2 þ  I C1   ICp3  Lm2  ¼  ICm2
dt C1 Cp3 dt2 Cm2

Remark D
Z
1 dIr 1 1 d 2 I Lm 4
VA13  VA12 ¼  ICm4  dt;  4  r4 þ  I C1   I C p 1  Lm 4 
Cm4 dt C1 Cp1 dt2
1
¼  I Cm 4
Cm4
Z Z
1 1 dILm4
VA9  Ir4  r4  ½VA9   IC1  dt þ  ICp1  dt þ Lm4  
Z C1 Cp1 dt
1
¼  ICm4  dt
Cm4
Z Z Z
1 1 dILm4 1
Ir4  r4 þ  I C1  dt   ICp1  dt  Lm4  ¼  ICm4  dt
C1 Cp1 dt Cm4
Z Z Z
d 1 1 dILm4 1
fIr4  r4 þ  I C1  dt   ICp1  dt  Lm4  ¼  ICm4  dtg
dt C1 Cp1 dt Cm4

dIr4 1 1 d 2 ILm4 1
  r4 þ  I C1   ICp1  Lm4  ¼  ICm4
dt C1 Cp1 dt2 Cm4
Lattice crystal filter differential equations group No. 2:

1 1 1 1
 ICp3   I Cp1 ¼  IC2 ;  IC1
Cp3 Cp1 C2 C1
1 1 1 1 1
¼  I Cp3 þ  ICp2 ;  IC1   I Cp1 ¼  I Cp4
Cp3 Cp2 C1 Cp1 Cp4

1 d 2 ILm3 dIr3 1 1 d 2 ILm1 dIr1


 ICp3  Lm3    r3 ¼  IC m
;  IC p
 L m 1
   r1
Cp3 dt2 dt Cm3 3
Cp1 1
dt2 dt
1
¼  ICm1
Cm1
722 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dIr2 1 1 d 2 ILm2 1
  r2 þ  I C1   ICp3  Lm2  ¼  ICm2
dt C1 Cp3 dt2 Cm2

dIr4 1 1 d 2 ILm4 1
  r4 þ  I C1   ICp1  Lm4  ¼  ICm4
dt C1 Cp1 dt2 Cm4

Lattice crystal filters Variables transformation:

Ir1 ¼ ICm1 ¼ ILm1 ; Ir2 ¼ ICm2 ¼ ILm2 ; Ir3 ¼ ICm3 ¼ ILm3 ;


Ir4 ¼ ICm4 ¼ ILm4 ; Irk ¼ ICmk ¼ ILmk 8 k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4
Ir1 ! ILm1 ; ICm1 ! ILm1 ; Ir2 ! ILm2 ; ICm2 ! ILm2 ; Ir3 ! ILm3 ;
ICm3 ! ILm3 ; Ir4 ! ILm4 ; ICm4 ! ILm4

Lattice crystal filter differential equations group No. 3:

1 1 1 1
 I Cp3   I Cp1 ¼  I C2 ;  I C1
Cp3 Cp1 C2 C1
1 1 1 1 1
¼  I Cp3 þ  I Cp2 ;  I C1   I Cp1 ¼  I Cp4
Cp3 Cp2 C1 Cp1 Cp4

1 d 2 ILm3 dILm3 1 1 d 2 ILm1 dILm1


 ICp3  Lm3    r 3 ¼  I Lm3 ;  I Cp1  L m1  
Cp3 dt2 dt Cm3 Cp1 dt2 dt
 r1
1
¼  ILm1
Cm1

dILm2 1 1 d 2 ILm2 1
  r2 þ  I C1   I C p 3  Lm 2  2
¼  ILm2
dt C1 Cp3 dt Cm2

dILm4 1 1 d 2 ILm4 1
  r4 þ  I C1   I C p 1  Lm 4  ¼  ILm4
dt C1 Cp1 dt2 Cm4

KCL @ A2: ICp3 þ ILm3 þ ICp1 þ ILm1 þ IC1 ¼ is1 ; KCL @ A9:
is1 ¼ IC1 þ ICp2 þ ILm2 þ ICp4 þ ILm4
KCL @ A 3: ICp3 þ ILm3 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp2 þ ILm2 KCL @ A6:
ICp4 þ ILm4 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp1 þ ILm1

Lattice crystal filter circuit transformer T1’s secondary coil current differential
equation:
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 723

ip1 ðtÞ ns n2 n1
¼  1 ¼  ) is1 ðtÞ ¼ ip1 ðtÞ  ; is1 ¼ is1 ðtÞ; ip1 ¼ ip1 ðtÞ; is1
is1 ðtÞ np 1 n1 n2
n1
¼ ip1 
n2

d
vs1 ¼ VC1 ¼ ðVA9  VA2 Þ ) VA9  VA2 ¼ vs1 ; IC1 ¼ C1  ðVA9  VA2 Þ; IC1
dt
dvs
¼ C1  1
dt

n2 n2 dip dis n2
ip1 ¼ IRs ; vs1 ¼ ½Vs ðtÞ  Rs  ip1   ; ip1 ¼ is1  ) 1 ¼  1 
n1 n1 dt dt n1

d½Vs ðtÞ  Rs  ip1   nn21


n2 dVs ðtÞ dip
IC1 ¼ C1  ¼ C1   ½  Rs  1 ;
dt n1 dt dt
n2 dVs ðtÞ dis1 n2
IC1 ¼ C1   ½  Rs  ð  Þ
n1 dt dt n1
n2 dVs ðtÞ n2 dis
IC1 ¼ C1   ½ þ Rs   1 ;
n1 dt n1 dt
n2 dis 1 n1 dVs ðtÞ
Rs   1 ¼ IC1   
n1 dt C 1 n2 dt

dis1 1 n2 n1 1 dVs ðtÞ


¼ IC1   12   
dt C1  Rs n2 n2 Rs dt

Lattice crystal filter circuit transformer T2’s primary coil current differential
equation:

ip2 ðtÞ ns n4 ip
IRload ¼ is2 ; vp2 ¼ VC2 ; ¼  2 ¼  ; ip2 ¼ ip2 ðtÞ; is2 ¼ is2 ðtÞ; 2
is2 ðtÞ np 2 n3 is2
n4
¼
n3
n4 n4 n3 n3
vs2 ¼ vp2  ¼ ½VA6  VA3   ; VA6  VA3 ¼ vs2  ; VA3  VA6 ¼ vs2  ; vs2
n3 n3 n4 n4
¼ is2  Rload

d d n3
IC2 ¼ C2  ½VA  VA6 ; vs2 ¼ VRload ; IC2 ¼ C2  ½vs2  ; IC2
dt 3 dt n4
n3 dvs2
¼ C2  
n4 dt

ip2 n4 n3 dis dip n3 n3 dis


¼  ) is2 ¼ ip2  ; 2 ¼  2  ; IC2 ¼ C2   Rload  2
is2 n3 n4 dt dt n4 n4 dt
724 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dis2 n4 dip n3 n4 dip2


¼  I C2 ;  2  ¼  I C2 ;
dt n3  C2  Rload dt n4 n3  C2  Rload dt
n24 1
¼ 2  IC 2
n3 C2  Rload

&&&

1 1 1 1
 I Cp3   I Cp1 ¼  I C2 ;  I C1
Cp3 Cp1 C2 C1
1 1 1 1 1
¼  I Cp3 þ  I Cp2 ;  I C1   I Cp1 ¼  I Cp4
Cp3 Cp2 C1 Cp1 Cp4

KCL @ A2: ICp3 þ ILm3 þ ICp1 þ ILm1 þ IC1 ¼ is1 ; KCL @ A9:
is1 ¼ IC1 þ ICp2 þ ILm2 þ ICp4 þ ILm4
KCL @ A 3: ICp3 þ ILm3 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp2 þ ILm2 KCL @ A6:
ICp4 þ ILm4 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp1 þ ILm1
Find circuit variables ICp1 ; ICp2 ; ICp3 ; ICp4 as a function of circuit variables
ILm1 ; ILm2 ; ILm3 ; ILm4 and circuit parameters Version No. 1:

1 1 1 1
 I Cp1   I Cp2   I Cp3 þ  ICp4 ¼ 0;
Cp1 Cp2 Cp3 Cp4
ICp3 þ ICp1  ICp2  ICp4 ¼ ILm1 þ ILm2  ILm3 þ ILm4
C2 C2 C2
I C2 ¼  I Cp3   I Cp1 ;  I Cp1
Cp3 Cp1 Cp1
C2
þ I Cp2  ½ þ 1  ICp3 ¼ ip2  ILm2 þ ILm3
Cp3

C2 C2 C2 C2
I C2 ¼  I Cp3   I Cp1 ; ½ þ 1  ICp1   ICp3  ICp4 ¼ ip2  ILm1 þ ILm4
Cp3 Cp1 Cp1 Cp3

X
4
ILmk  ð1Þk ¼ ILm1 þ ILm2  ILm3 þ ILm4 ; ip2  ILm2 þ ILm3
k¼1
X
3
¼ ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1
k¼2

X
4
ip2  ILm1 þ ILm4 ¼ ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk
k¼1
k 6¼ 2
k 6¼ 3
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 725

Find circuit variables ICp1 ; ICp2 ; ICp3 ; ICp4 as a function of circuit variables
ILm1 ; ILm2 ; ILm3 ; ILm4 and circuit parameters Version No. 2:

1 1 1 1
 I Cp1   I Cp2   I Cp3 þ  ICp4 ¼ 0;
Cp1 Cp2 Cp3 Cp4
X4
I Cp3 þ I Cp1  I Cp2  I Cp4 ¼ ILmk  ð1Þk
k¼1

C2 C2 X3
 ICp1 þ ICp2  ½ þ 1  ICp3 ¼ ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1
Cp1 Cp3 k¼2

C2 C2 X4
½ þ 1  ICp1   ICp3  ICp4 ¼ ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk
Cp1 Cp3 k¼1

6 2
k¼6 3

Find circuit variables ICp1 ; ICp2 ; ICp3 ; ICp4 as a function of circuit variables
ILm1 ; ILm2 ; ILm3 ; ILm4 and circuit parameters Version No. 3:
0 1 0 1
1
C p1 ! Cp1 !
Cp1 3 1
B 1
C B 1 C C p4
@ A þ I Cp2  þ I Cp3  @ ½CCp23 þ 1 A þ ICp4 
C2 2
I Cp1 C p1
1
1
1
0
C2 0 C 1
þ1  2
C p1 Cp3
0 0 1
P
4

B C
ILm ð1Þk
B C
k
k¼1
B P 3 C
B ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 C
¼B C
B k¼2
C
B ip þ P 4
k C
@ 2 ILmk ð1Þ
A
k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

1 1 1 1
 I Cp1   ICp2   I Cp3 þ  ICp4 ¼ 0 ) ICp1
Cp1 Cp2 Cp3 Cp4
Cp Cp Cp
¼ 1  ICp2 þ 1  ICp3  1  ICp4
Cp2 Cp3 Cp4

Cp1 Cp Cp X4
½  1  ICp2 þ ½ 1 þ 1  ICp3  ½ 1 þ 1  ICp4 ¼ ILmk  ð1Þk
Cp2 Cp3 Cp4 k¼1

C2 C2 X3
½ þ 1  ICp2  ICp3   ICp4 ¼ ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1
Cp2 Cp4 k¼2
726 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
½ þ 1  1  ICp2 þ 1  ICp3  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ICp4
Cp1 Cp2 Cp3 Cp1 Cp4
X 4
¼ ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk
k¼1
k 6¼ 2
k 6¼ 3

We can summery our circuit variables ICp1 ; ICp2 ; ICp3 ; ICp4 as a function of circuit
variables ILm1 ; ILm2 ; ILm3 ; ILm4 and circuit parameters Version No. 4:

Cp1 Cp Cp
I Cp1 ¼  I Cp2 þ 1  I Cp3  1  I Cp4
Cp2 Cp3 Cp4
0 1 0 1
Cp
½Cp1 1 Cp ! Cp
½Cp1 þ 1
½Cp1 þ 1
B 2
C B 4
C
A  I Cp2 þ  I Cp3 þ @ A  I Cp4
C 3 C
@ ½ 2 þ 1
Cp2 1
C p1
 2
C p4
C Cp C Cp
½ 2 þ 1 1 C p3 ð½ 2 þ 1 1 þ 1Þ
0 1
Cp1 Cp2 Cp1 Cp4

P
4
ILmk ð1Þk
B k¼1 C
B C
B ip þ P3
C
B 2 ILm ð1Þ k þ 1
C
¼B k¼2
k
C
B P 4 C
B ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk C
@ k¼1
A
k6¼2
k6¼3

We use Cramer’s rule for the solution of above linear equations. Each variable
(Cpk ; k ¼ 2; 3; 4) given by a quotient two determinants.
0 C C C 1
½Cpp1  1 ½Cpp1 þ 1 ½Cpp1 þ 1
B 2 3 4
C
D ¼ detB
@ ½CCp2 þ 1
2
1  CCp2
4
C
A
C Cp 1 C
½CCp2 þ 1  Cpp1 Cp 3 ð½CCp2 þ 1  Cpp1 þ 1Þ
1 2 1 4

0 1
Cp1 1  CCp2
D¼½ @
 1  det Cp
4
A  ½Cp1 þ 1
Cp1
Cp2 1
C p3 ð½Cp þ 1  Cp þ 1Þ
C 2 Cp3
0 C 1 4
1
½Cp2 þ 1  CCp2
@
 det C
2 4
A  ½Cp1 þ 1
Cp1 Cp1
½Cp þ 1  Cp ð½Cp þ 1  Cp þ 1Þ
2 C2 Cp4
0 1C 2
11 4

½Cp2 þ 1 1
@
 det C
2
A; D ¼ DðCp1 ; . . .; Cp4 ; C2 Þ
C C
½Cp2 þ 1  Cpp1 Cpp1
1 2 3
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 727

0 1
Cp1
P
4 Cp ½ þ 1
B ILmk  ð1Þk ½ 1 þ 1 Cp4 C
B Cp3 C
B k¼1 C
B C
B ip þ P IL  ð1Þk þ 1
3
1 Cp2
C
C
DICp2 B
¼ detB 4 C
C
2 mk
k¼2
B C2 Cp C
B þ 1Þ C
B i þ P I  ð1Þk þ 1  1
4 Cp1 ð½ C
@ p2 Lmk
Cp3
Cp1 Cp4 A
k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

!
X
4 C2 Cp
ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ
C
k Cp2
DICp2 ¼ ð ILmk  ð1Þ Þ  det 1 C p1
4
Cp1 Cp4
k¼1 C p3
0 1
P3 C2
B i p2
þ ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  C
B k¼2 Cp4 C
Cp1 B C
½ þ 1  detB P
Cp1 C
Cp3 B 4 C2
ð½Cp þ 1 þ 1 ÞC
@ ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk 1 Cp4 A
k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
0 1
P
3
kþ1
B ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þ 1 C
B k¼2 C
C B C
½Cpp1 þ 1  detB C p1 C
B ip þ P IL  ð1Þk
4
4 C p3 C
@ 2 mk
k¼1
A
k6¼2
k6¼3

X
4
C2 Cp Cp C2
DICp2 ¼ ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ  ½ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ þ 1  
k¼1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp3 Cp4
Cp C2 Cp C2 Cp
 ½ 1 þ 1  ½ip2  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ
Cp3 Cp1 Cp4 Cp1 Cp4
X3
C2 C2 X 4
Cp
 ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  ip2  þ  ILmk  ð1Þk   ½ 1 þ 1
k¼2
Cp4 Cp4 k¼1 Cp4
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 Cp X 3 X4
 ½ip2  þ 1 ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk 
Cp3 Cp3 k¼2 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
728 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

X
4
C2 Cp Cp C2
DICp2 ¼ ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ  ½ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ þ 1  
k¼1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp3 Cp4
Cp C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
 ip2  ½ 1 þ 1  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ þ ½ 1 þ 1  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ
Cp3 Cp1 Cp4 Cp3 Cp1 Cp4
X3
Cp C2 C2 Cp1 X4
 ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1 þ ip2  ½ 1 þ 1   ½ þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk
k¼2
C p3 Cp4 C p4 C p3 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 Cp Cp Cp X3
Cp
þ ip2  ½ þ 1  1  1  ½ 1 þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1 þ ½ 1 þ 1  ip2
Cp4 Cp3 Cp3 Cp4 k¼2
Cp4
C P
4
½Cpp1 þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk
4 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X
4
C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
DICp2 ¼ ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ  ½ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ þ 1   þ ½ 1 þ 1
k¼1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp3 Cp4 Cp3
C2 Cp X3
C2 Cp1
 ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  ½ þ 1
Cp1 Cp4 k¼2
C p4 Cp3
X
4
Cp1 Cp1 X3
Cp
 ILmk  ð1Þk  ½ þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  ½ 1 þ 1
k¼1
Cp3 Cp4 k¼2
Cp4
k6¼2
k6¼3

X
4
Cp C2 Cp C2 Cp
 ILmk  ð1Þk þ ip2  f½ 1 þ 1   ½ 1 þ 1  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ
k¼1
Cp3 Cp4 Cp3 Cp1 Cp4
k6¼2
k6¼3

C C C
þ ½Cpp1 þ 1  Cpp1 þ ½Cpp1 þ 1g
4 3 4

We can define DICp2 as DICp2 ¼ ip2  C1 þ w1 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ

Cp1 C2 Cp C2 Cp Cp
C1 ¼ ½ þ 1   ½ 1 þ 1  ðð þ 1Þ  1 þ 1Þ þ ½ 1 þ 1
Cp3 Cp4 Cp3 Cp1 Cp4 Cp4
Cp1 Cp1
 þ½ þ 1
Cp3 Cp4

w1 ¼ w1 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ


7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 729

X
4
C2 Cp Cp C2
w1 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ ¼ ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ  ½ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ þ 1  
k¼1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp3 Cp4
Cp1 C2 Cp X
3
C2 Cp1 X4
þ½ þ 1  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  ½ þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk
Cp3 Cp1 Cp4 k¼2
Cp4 Cp3 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 Cp1 X3
Cp X4
 ½ þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  ½ 1 þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk
Cp3 Cp4 k¼2
C p4 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

0 1
C P
4
k C
B  1 ½Cpp1 ILmk  ð1Þ ½Cpp1 þ 1 C
B 2
k¼1 4 C
B P C
B C2 3 C
B ½ þ 1 ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  CCp2 C
DICp3 ¼ detB Cp2 C
B C
4
k¼2
B C P
4 C
B ½ 2 þ 1  Cp1 ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk ð½CCp2 þ 1  Cpp1
C
þ 1Þ C
@ Cp 1 Cp2
k¼1 1 4
A
k6¼2
k6¼3

0 1
P3
B ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  CCp2 C
B k¼2 4 C
Cp B C
DICp3 ¼ ½ 1  1  detB C
B ip þ P IL  ð1Þk
4
þ 1Þ C
Cp2 C
@ 2 mk
ð½CCp2 þ 1  Cpp1 A
k¼1 1 4
k6¼2
k6¼3
0 1
X
4 ½CCp2 þ 1  CCp2
ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ  det@ A
2 4
C C
k¼1 ½CCp2 þ 1  Cpp1 ð½CCp2 þ 1  Cpp1 þ 1Þ
0 1 2 1 4
1
P3
kþ1
B ½CCp2
þ 1 ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þ C
B 2
k¼2 C
Cp1 B C
½ þ 1  detB P4 C
Cp4 B ½ C2 þ 1  Cp1 ip2 þ k C
ILmk  ð1Þ A
@ Cp1 Cp2
k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 C2 Cp C2 Cp X3
DICp3 ¼ ½  1  fip2  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1
Cp2 Cp1 C p4 C p1 Cp4 k¼2

C2 C2 X 4 X4
C2 Cp C2 C2 C2 Cp
ip2  þ  IL  ð1Þk g  ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ  fð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1  1 g
Cp4 Cp4 k¼1 mk k¼1
C p1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp1 Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 C2 C2 X4
C2 Cp C2 Cp X 3
½ þ 1  fip2  ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk þ ½ þ 1  1  ip2  ½ þ 1  1  IL  ð1Þk þ 1 g
Cp4 Cp2 Cp2 k¼1
Cp1 C p2 Cp1 Cp2 k¼2 mk
k6¼2
k6¼3
730 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

C p1 C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
DICp3 ¼ ip2  ½  1  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ½ 1  1  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ
C p2 Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp1 C p4
X3
Cp C2 Cp C2 X4
 ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  ip2  ½ 1  1  þ ½ 1  1   ILmk  ð1Þk
k¼2
Cp 2
Cp 4
Cp 2
Cp 4 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

X
4
C2 Cp C2 C2 C2 Cp
ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ  fð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1  1 g
k¼1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp1 C p2
Cp1 C2 Cp C2 X4
þ i p2  ½ þ 1  ½ þ 1  ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk
Cp4 Cp2 C p4 C p2 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp X 3
½ þ 1  ½ þ 1  1  ip2 þ ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  1  IL  ð1Þk þ 1
Cp4 Cp1 C p2 Cp4 Cp1 Cp2 k¼2 mk

Cp1 C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
DICp3 ¼ ip2  f½  1  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ½ 1  1  þ ½ 1 þ 1
Cp2 Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp4
C2 Cp1 C2 Cp1 Cp1 C2 Cp
½ þ 1½ þ 1  ½ þ 1  g½  1  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ
Cp2 Cp4 Cp1 Cp2 Cp2 Cp1 Cp4
X3
Cp C2 X 4 X4
 ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1 þ ½ 1  1   ILmk  ð1Þk  ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ
k¼2
C p2 C p4 k¼1 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

C2 Cp C2 C2 C2 Cp Cp C2
 fð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1  1 g  ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp1 Cp2 Cp4 Cp2
X4
Cp C2 Cp X 3
 ILmk  ð1Þk þ ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  1  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1
k¼1
C p4
C p1
C p2 k¼2
k6¼2
k6¼3

We can define DICp3 as DICp3 ¼ ip2  C2 þ w2 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ.

Cp1 C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp C2
C2 ¼ ½  1  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ½ 1  1  þ ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1
Cp2 Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp4 Cp2
Cp C2 Cp
 ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  1
Cp4 Cp1 Cp2

w2 ¼ w2 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ


7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 731

Cp1 C2 Cp
w2 ðILm k ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½  1  ð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ
Cp2 Cp1 Cp4
X
3
Cp C2 X 4 X 4
 ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1 þ ½ 1  1   ILmk  ð1Þk  ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ
k¼2
Cp2 Cp4 k¼1 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

C2 Cp C2 C2 C2 Cp Cp
 fð½ þ 1  1 þ 1Þ  ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1  1 g  ½ 1 þ 1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp1 Cp2 Cp4
C2 X4
Cp C2 Cp X 3
½ þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk þ ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  1  IL  ð1Þk þ 1
Cp2 k¼1
Cp4 C p1 Cp2 k¼2 mk
k6¼2
k6¼3

0 1
C C P
4
k
B  1
½Cpp1 ½Cpp1 þ 1 ILmk  ð1Þ C
B 2 3
k¼1 C
B P C
B C2 3
kþ1 C
B ½ þ 1 1 ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þ C
DICp4 ¼ detB Cp2 C
B k¼2 C
B C P4 C
B ½ 2 þ 1  Cp1 C p1
ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk C
@ Cp1 C p2 C p3
k¼1
A
k6¼2
k6¼3

0 1
P
3
kþ1
B 1 ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þ C
B k¼2 C
Cp1 B C
DICp4 ¼½  1  detB Cp P4 C
Cp2 B 1 ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk C
@ Cp3 k¼1
A
k6¼2
k6¼3
0 1
P
3
B ½CCp2 þ 1 ip2 þ ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1 C
B 2
k¼2 C
Cp1 B C
½ þ 1  detB P
4 C
Cp3 B ½ C2 þ 1  Cp1 ip2 þ k C
ILmk  ð1Þ A
@ Cp1 C p2
k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
! 0 1
X
4 ½CCp2 þ 1 1
þ ILmk  ð1Þk  det@ A
2
C Cp1
k¼1 ½CCp2 þ 1  Cpp1 Cp3
1 2
732 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

Cp1 X4
Cp Cp X 3
DICp4 ¼ ½  1  fip2  ILmk  ð1Þk þ ip2  1  1  IL  ð1Þk þ 1 g
Cp2 k¼1
Cp3 Cp3 k¼2 mk
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 C2 C2 X4
C2 Cp
½ þ 1  fip2  ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk þ ip2  ½ þ 1  1
Cp3 Cp2 Cp2 k¼1
Cp1 Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3

C2 Cp X 3 X 4
C2 Cp C2 Cp
½ þ 1  1  IL  ð1Þk þ 1 g þ ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ  f½ þ 1  1 þ ½ þ 1  1 g
Cp1 Cp2 k¼2 mk k¼1
C p2
C p 3
C p1
Cp 2

Cp Cp X4
Cp Cp Cp
DICp4 ¼ ½ 1  1  ip2  ½ 1  1  ILmk  ð1Þk þ ip2  ½ 1  1  1  ½ 1  1
Cp2 Cp2 k¼1
C p2
C p3
Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 X3
Cp C2 Cp C2
  IL  ð1Þk þ 1 þ ip2  ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1
Cp3 k¼2 mk Cp3 Cp2 Cp3 Cp2
X
4
Cp C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
 ILmk  ð1Þk  ip2  ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  1 þ ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  1
k¼1
Cp3 Cp1 Cp2 Cp3 Cp1 Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3

X
3 X
4
C2 Cp C2 Cp
 ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1 þ ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ  f½ þ 1  1 þ ½ þ 1  1 g
k¼2 k¼1
C p2 Cp3 C p1 C p2

Cp1 Cp Cp Cp C2 Cp
DICp4 ¼ ip2  f½  1 þ ½ 1  1  1 þ ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  ½ 1 þ 1
Cp2 Cp2 Cp3 Cp3 Cp2 Cp3
C2 Cp Cp X4
Cp
½ þ 1  1 g  ½ 1  1  ILmk  ð1Þk  ½ 1  1
Cp1 Cp2 Cp2 k¼1
Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 X3
Cp C2 X4
  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk
Cp3 k¼2 Cp3 Cp2 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 C2 Cp X 3 X4
þ½ þ 1  ½ þ 1  1  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1 þ ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ
Cp3 Cp1 Cp2 k¼2 k¼1
C2 Cp C2 Cp
 f½ þ 1  1 þ ½ þ 1  1 g
Cp2 Cp3 Cp1 Cp2

We can define DICp4 as DICp4 ¼ ip2  C3 þ w3 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ.

Cp Cp Cp Cp C2 Cp C2
C3 ¼ ½ 1  1 þ ½ 1  1  1 þ ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1
Cp2 Cp2 Cp3 Cp3 Cp2 Cp3 Cp1
Cp
 1
Cp2
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 733

w3 ¼ w3 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ

C p1 X4
Cp
w3 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½  1  ILmk  ð1Þk  ½ 1  1
C p2 k¼1
Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 X3
Cp C2 X4
Cp C2
  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1  ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1  ILmk  ð1Þk þ ½ 1 þ 1  ½ þ 1
Cp3 k¼2 Cp3 Cp2 k¼1
Cp 3 Cp1
k6¼2
k6¼3

Cp1 X3 X 4
C2 Cp C2 Cp
  ILmk  ð1Þk þ 1 þ ð ILmk  ð1Þk Þ  f½ þ 1  1 þ ½ þ 1  1 g
Cp2 k¼2 k¼1
Cp2 Cp3 Cp1 Cp2

We can summery our expressions for ILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4:

DICp2 C1 w1 DICp3 C2 w2 DICp4


I Cp2 ¼ ¼ ip2  þ ; I Cp3 ¼ ¼ ip2  þ ; I Cp4 ¼
D D D D D D D
C3 w3
¼ ip2  þ
D D
Cp1 C1 w1 Cp C2 w2 Cp C3 w3
I Cp1 ¼  ½ip2  þ  þ 1  ½ip2  þ   1  ½ip2  þ 
Cp2 D D Cp3 D D Cp4 D D

Cp1 C1 C2 C3 Cp w w w
ICp1 ¼ ip2  ½ þ  þ 1  ½ 1 þ 2  3
D Cp2 Cp3 Cp4 D Cp2 Cp3 Cp4

We define for simplicity new parameter C4 and function w4 ðw1 ; w2 ; w3;...Þ

C1 C2 C3 w w w Cp Cp
C4 ¼ þ  ; w ¼ 1 þ 2  3 ; ICp1 ¼ ip2  1  C4 þ 1  w4
Cp2 Cp3 Cp4 4 Cp2 Cp3 Cp4 D D

Lattice crystal filter differential equations group No. 4:

1 d 2 ILm3 dILm3 1 1 d 2 ILm1 dILm1


 ICp3  Lm3    r 3 ¼  I L m3
;  I C p1
 L m 1
 
Cp3 dt2 dt Cm3 Cp1 dt2 dt
 r1
1
¼  ILm1
Cm1

dILm2 1 1 d 2 ILm2 1
  r2 þ  I C1   I C p 3  Lm 2  2
¼  ILm2
dt C1 Cp3 dt Cm2

dILm4 1 1 d 2 ILm4 1
  r4 þ  I C1   I C p 1  Lm 4  ¼  ILm4
dt C1 Cp1 dt2 Cm4
734 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dis1 1 n2 n1 1 dVs ðtÞ dip2 n2 1


¼ IC1   12    ; ¼  42   I C2
dt C1  Rs n2 n2 Rs dt dt n3 C2  Rload

dILm1 dILm2 dILm3


We define for simplicity new variables Y1 ¼ dt ; Y2 ¼ dt ; Y3 ¼ dt ;
dILm4
Y4 ¼ dt

dY1 d 2 ILm1 dY2 d 2 ILm2 dY3 d 2 ILm3 dY4 d 2 ILm4


¼ ; ¼ ; ¼ ; ¼
dt dt2 dt dt2 dt dt2 dt dt2

Lattice crystal filter differential equations group No. 5:

1 dY3 1 1 dY1
 ICp3  Lm3   Y3  r 3 ¼  ILm3 ;  ICp1  Lm1   Y 1  r1
Cp3 dt Cm3 Cp1 dt
1
¼  ILm1
Cm1

1 1 dY2 1 dILm1 dILm2


Y2  r2 þ  I C1   ICp3  Lm2  ¼  ILm2 ; ¼ Y1 ;
C1 Cp3 dt Cm2 dt dt
dILm3 dILm4
¼ Y2 ; ¼ Y3 ; ¼ Y4
dt dt
1 1 dY4 1
Y4  r4 þ  I C1   I C p 1  Lm 4  ¼  ILm4
C1 Cp1 dt Cm4

dis1 1 n2 n1 1 dVs ðtÞ dip2 n2 1


¼ IC1   12    ; ¼  42   I C2
dt C1  Rs n2 n2 Rs dt dt n3 C2  Rload

Lattice crystal filter differential equations group No. 6:

dY3 1 r3 1 dY1
¼  I C p 3  Y3    ILm3 ;
dt Cp3  Lm3 Lm3 Cm3  Lm3 dt
1 r1 1
¼  I C p 1  Y1    ILm1
Cp1  Lm1 Lm1 Cm1  Lm1

dY2 r2 1 1 1
¼ Y2  þ  I C1   I Cp3   ILm2
dt Lm2 C1  Lm2 Cp3  Lm2 Cm2  Lm2

dY4 r4 1 1 1
¼ Y4  þ  I C1   I Cp1   ILm4
dt Lm4 C1  Lm4 Cp1  Lm4 Cm4  Lm4

dILm1 dILm2 dILm3 dILm4


¼ Y1 ; ¼ Y2 ; ¼ Y3 ; ¼ Y4
dt dt dt dt
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 735

dis1 1 n2 n1 1 dVs ðtÞ dip2 n2 1


¼ IC1   12    ; ¼  42   I C2
dt C1  Rs n2 n2 Rs dt dt n3 C2  Rload

Lattice crystal filter differential equations group No. 7:

dY3 1 C2 w2 r3 1
¼  ½ip2  þ   Y3    ILm3
dt Cp3  Lm3 D D Lm3 Cm3  Lm3
dY1 1 Cp Cp r1 1
¼  ½ip2  1  C4 þ 1  w4   Y1    I Lm 1
dt Cp1  Lm1 D D Lm1 Cm1  Lm1

dY2 r2 1 1 C2 w2 1
¼ Y2  þ  I C1   ½ip2  þ   ILm2
dt Lm2 C1  Lm2 Cp3  Lm2 D D Cm2  Lm2

dY4 r4 1 1 Cp Cp 1
¼ Y4  þ  I C1   ½ip2  1  C4 þ 1  w4  
dt Lm4 C1  Lm4 Cp1  Lm4 D D Cm4  Lm4
 ILm4

dILm1 dILm2 dILm3 dILm4


¼ Y1 ; ¼ Y2 ; ¼ Y3 ; ¼ Y4
dt dt dt dt

dis1 1 n2 n1 1 dVs ðtÞ dip2 n2 1


¼ IC1   12    ; ¼  42   I C2
dt C1  Rs n2 n2 Rs dt dt n3 C2  Rload

dILm1
At fixed points (equilibrium points): dYk
dt ¼ 0 8 k = 1,2,3; 4; dt ¼0

dILm2 dILm3 dILm4 dis dip


¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; 1 ¼ 0; 2 ¼ 0; Yk ¼ 0 8 k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4
dt dt dt dt dt

dVs ðtÞ n2
Assumption dt ! e. IC1  C11Rs  n12 ! e ) IC 1 ¼ 0; IC 2 ¼ 0:
2

dY1 1 Cp Cp 1
¼0)  ½i  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðILm ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ   I ¼ 0
dt Cp1  Lm1 p2 D D k Cm1  Lm1 Lm1


dY2 1 C2 w2 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ 1
¼0)  ½ip2  þ   I ¼ 0
dt Cp3  Lm2 D D Cm2  Lm2 Lm2


dY3 1 C2 w2 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ 1
¼0)  ½ip2  þ   I ¼ 0
dt Cp3  Lm3 D D Cm3  Lm3 Lm3
736 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dY4 1 Cp Cp 1
¼0)  ½i  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðILm ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ   I ¼ 0
dt C p 1  L m4 p 2 D D k C m 4  L m 4 L m4

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of Lattice crystal filter circuit consists in adding to its coordi-
nated [Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 ILm1 ILm2 ILm3 ILm4 is1 ip2 ] arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential terms ½y1 y2 y3 y4 iLm1 iLm2 iLm3 iLm4 i0s1 i0p2   ekt , and retaining the first order
terms in y1 y2 y3 y4 iLm1 iLm2 iLm3 iLm4 i0s1 i0p2 . The system of ten homogeneous equations
leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvaluek. The polynomial
characteristic equation accepts by set the Lattice crystal filter circuit equations. The
Lattice crystal filter circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential form ½y1 y2 y3 y4 iLm1 iLm2 iLm3 iLm4 i0s1 i0p2   ekt are; i = 0 (first fixed point),
i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,

ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ; Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
ILm1 ðtÞ ¼ ILm þ iLm1  ekt ; ILm2 ðtÞ ¼ ILm þ iLm2  ekt ;
1 2
ðiÞ kt ðiÞ
ILm3 ðtÞ ¼ I Lm þ iLm3  e ; ILm4 ðtÞ ¼ I Lm þ iLm4  ekt
3 4

is1 ðtÞ ¼ isðiÞ1 þ i0s1  ekt ; ip2 ðtÞ ¼ ipðiÞ2 þ i0p2  ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
IC2 ðtÞ ¼ IC2 þ iC2  ekt ; IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IC1 þ iC1  ekt

dY1 ðtÞ dY2 ðtÞ dY3 ðtÞ dY4 ðtÞ


¼ y1  k  ekt ; ¼ y2  k  ekt ; ¼ y3  k  ekt ; ¼ y4  k  ekt
dt dt dt dt

dILm1 ðtÞ dILm2 ðtÞ dILm3 ðtÞ dILm4 ðtÞ


¼ iLm1  k  ekt ; ¼ iLm2  k  ekt ; ¼ iLm3  k  ekt ;
dt dt dt dt
¼ iLm4  k  ekt

dis1 ðtÞ dip ðtÞ


¼ i0s1  k  ekt ; 2 ¼ i0p2  k  ekt
dt dt
C2 C2 C2 C2
I C2 ¼  ICp3   ICp1 ¼ ip2  ½  C4 
Cp3 Cp1 D Cp3
C2 1
þ ½  w ðIL ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ
D Cp3 2 mk
 w4 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 737

C1 C1 C1 C2 C1
I C1 ¼  ICp3 þ  ICp2 ¼ ip2  ½ þ 
Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 Cp2
C1 1 1
þ ½  w ðIL ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ þ
D Cp3 2 mk Cp2
 w1 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ
C1 C1 C1 C3
I C1 ¼  ICp4 þ  ICp1 ¼ ip2  ½ þ C4 
Cp4 Cp1 D Cp4
C1 1
þ ½  w ðIL ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ
D Cp4 3 mk
þ w4 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ

dVs ðtÞ
Lattice crystal filter differential equations group No. 8: dt !e

dY3 1 C2 w2 r3 1
¼  ½ip2  þ   Y3    ILm3
dt Cp3  Lm3 D D Lm3 Cm3  Lm3
dY1 1 Cp Cp r1 1
¼  ½ip2  1  C4 þ 1  w4   Y1    I Lm 1
dt Cp1  Lm1 D D Lm1 Cm1  Lm1

dY2 r2 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
¼ Y2  þ  ðip2  ½ þ þ ½ w þ  w Þ
dt Lm2 C1  Lm2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Cp2 1
1 C2 w2 1
  ½ip2  þ   ILm2
Cp3  Lm2 D D Cm2  Lm2

dY4 r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
¼ Y4  þ  ðip2  ½ þ þ ½ w þ  w Þ
dt Lm4 C1  Lm4 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Cp2 1
1 Cp Cp 1
  ½ip2  1  C4 þ 1  w4    ILm4
Cp1  Lm4 D D Cm4  Lm4

dILm1 dILm2 dILm3 dILm4


¼ Y1 ; ¼ Y2 ; ¼ Y3 ; ¼ Y4
dt dt dt dt
dis1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1 1
¼ fip2  ½ þ þ ½ w þ  w g 
dt D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Cp2 1 C1  Rs
n21 n1 1 dVs ðtÞ
   
n22 n2 Rs dt
dip2 n2 1 C2 C2 C2 1
¼  42   fip2  ½  C4  þ ½  w  w4 g
dt n3 C2  Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 2
738 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

Remark

wk ðILmk ðtÞ ¼ ILm þ iLmk  ekt ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ


k

¼ wk ðILm ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ


k

þ wk ðiLmk  ekt ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ;


wk ðILmk Þ ¼ wk ðILm Þ þ wk ðiLmk  ekt Þ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4
k

wk ðiLmk  ekt Þ ¼ ekt  wk ðiLmk Þ 8 k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4

For k < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 unstable.
Our Lattice crystal filter circuit tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for
k < 0, t > 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the
eigenvalue parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or unstable,
additionally his absolute value |k| establish the speed of flow toward or away from
the selected fixed point [2–4].

dY1 1 Cp Cp r1 1
¼  ½ip2  1  C4 þ 1  w4   Y1    I Lm 1
dt Cp1  Lm1 D D Lm1 Cm1  Lm1

1 Cp Cp
y1  k  ekt ¼  ½ðipðiÞ2 þ i0p2  ekt Þ  1  C4 þ 1  ðw4 ðILm Þ þ w4 ðiLmk  ekt ÞÞ
Cp1  Lm1 D D k

ðiÞ r1 1 ðiÞ
 ½Y1 þ y1  ekt     ½I þ iLm1  ekt 
Lm1 Cm1  Lm1 Lm1

1 Cp Cp Cp
y1  k  ekt ¼  ½ipðiÞ2  1  C4 þ i0p2  1  C4  ekt þ 1  w4 ðILm Þ
Cp1  Lm1 D D D k

Cp1 ðiÞ r r 1
 w4 ðiLmk  ekt Þ  Y1   ekt 
1 1
þ  y1 
D Lm1 Lm1 Cm1  Lm1
ðiÞ 1
 I Lm   iL  ekt
1 Cm1  Lm1 m1

1 Cp Cp ðiÞ r1 1 ðiÞ
y1  k  ekt ¼  ½iðiÞ  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðILm Þ  Y1   I
Cp1  Lm1 p2 D D k Lm1 Cm1  Lm1 Lm1
1 Cp Cp
þ  ½i0p2  1  C4  ekt þ 1  w4 ðiLmk  ekt Þ
Cp1  Lm1 D D
r1 1
 y1   ekt   iL  ekt
Lm1 Cm1  Lm1 m1

ðiÞ C p1 C p1 ðiÞ
At fixed points: 1
Cp1 Lm1  ½ip2  D  C4 þ D  w4 ðILm Þ  Y1  Lrm1  Cm 1Lm 
k 1 1 1
ðiÞ
I Lm ¼ 0
1
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 739

1 Cp Cp r1 1
y1  k þ  ½i0  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðiLmk Þ  y1    iL
Cp1  Lm1 p2 D D Lm1 Cm1  Lm1 m1
¼0

dY2 r2 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
¼ Y2  þ  ðip2  ½ þ þ ½ w þ  w Þ
dt Lm2 C1  Lm2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Cp2 1
1 C2 w2 1
  ½ip2  þ   I Lm 2
Cp3  Lm2 D D Cm2  Lm2

ðiÞ r2 1 C1 C2 C1
y2  k  ekt ¼ ½Y2 þ y2  ekt   þ  ð½iðiÞ 0 kt
p2 þ ip2  e   ½ þ 
Lm2 C 1  L m2 D Cp3 Cp2
C1 1 1
þ ½  ½w2 ðILm Þ þ w2 ðiLmk  ekt Þ þ  fw1 ðILm Þ þ w1 ðiLmk  ekt ÞgÞ
D Cp3 k Cp2 k

 kt
1 C2 ½w2 ðILmk Þ þ w2 ðiLmk  e Þ
  ½ðiðiÞ þ i 0
 ekt
Þ  þ 
Cp3  Lm2 p2 p2
D D
1 ðiÞ
  ½I þ iLm2  ekt 
Cm2  Lm2 Lm2

ðiÞr2 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1
y2  k  ekt ¼ Y2  þ  ðiðiÞ  ½ þ þ ½  w ðI  Þ
Lm2 C1  Lm2 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Lmk

1 1 C2 w2 ðILmk Þ 1 ðiÞ r2
þ  w1 ðILm ÞÞ   ½iðiÞ  þ   I  y2  ekt 
Cp2 k Cp3  Lm2 p 2
D D Cm2  Lm2 Lm2 Lm2
1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
þ  ði0  ekt  ½ þ þ ½  w ðiL  ekt Þ þ  w ðiL  ekt ÞÞ
C1  Lm2 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 mk Cp2 1 mk
1 C2 w2 ðiLmk  ekt Þ 1
  ½i0p2  ekt  þ   iL  ekt
Cp3  Lm2 D D C m 2  L m 2 m2

At fixed points:

r2
ðiÞ 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1
 Y2  þ  ðipðiÞ2  ½ þ þ ½  w ðI  Þ
Lm2 C1  Lm2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Lmk
w2 ðILm Þ
1  1 ðiÞ C2 1 ðiÞ
þ  w ðI ÞÞ   ½i  þ k
 I ¼0
Cp2 1 Lmk Cp3  Lm2 p2 D D Cm2  Lm2 Lm2

r2 1 C1 C2 C1 C1
y2  k  ekt ¼ y2  ekt  þ  ði0  ekt  ½ þ þ
Lm2 C1  Lm2 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D
1 1 1
½  w ðiL  ekt Þ þ  w ðiL  ekt ÞÞ 
Cp3 2 mk Cp2 1 mk Cp3  Lm2
kt
C2 w2 ðiLmk  e Þ 1
 ½i0p2  ekt  þ   iL  ekt
D D Cm2  Lm2 m2
740 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
kt kt
w1 ðiLmk  e Þ ¼ e  w1 ðiLmk Þ; w2 ðiLmk  e Þ ¼ ekt  w2 ðiLmk Þ
kt

r2 1 C1 1 1 1
 y2  k  y2  þ i0p2   þ ½  w2 ðiLmk Þ þ  w ðiL Þ
Lm2 D  Lm2 Cp2 Lm2  D Cp3 Cp2 1 mk
1 w2 ðiLmk Þ 1
    iL ¼ 0
Cp3  Lm2 D Cm2  Lm2 m2

dY3 1 C2 w2 r3 1
¼  ½ip2  þ   Y3    ILm3
dt Cp3  Lm3 D D Lm3 Cm3  Lm3
 kt
1 C2 ½w2 ðILmk Þ þ w2 ðiLmk  e Þ
y3  k  ekt ¼  ½ðipðiÞ2 þ i0p2  ekt Þ  þ 
Cp3  Lm3 D D
ðiÞ r3 1 ðiÞ
 ðY3 þ y3  ekt Þ    ðILm þ iLm3  ekt Þ
Lm3 Cm3  Lm3 3

w2 ðILm Þ
kt 1 ðiÞ C2 ðiÞ r3 1 ðiÞ
y3  k  e ¼  ½i  þ k
  Y3   I
Cp3  Lm3 p2 D D Lm3 Cm3  Lm3 Lm3
kt
1 C2 w2 ðiLmk  e Þ r3
þ  ½i0p2  ekt  þ   y3  ekt 
Cp3  Lm3 D D Lm3
1
  iL  ekt
Cm3  Lm3 m3

ðiÞ w2 ðILm Þ ðiÞ ðiÞ


At fixed points: 1
Cp3 Lm3  ½ip2  CD2 þ D
k
  Y3  Lrm3  Cm 1Lm  ILm ¼ 0
3 3 3 3

1 C2 w2 ðiLmk Þ r3 1
y3  k þ  ½i0p2  þ   y3    iL ¼ 0
Cp3  Lm3 D D Lm3 Cm3  Lm3 m3

dY4 r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
¼ Y4  þ  ðip2  ½ þ þ ½ w þ  w Þ
dt Lm4 C1  Lm4 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Cp2 1
1 Cp Cp 1
  ½ip2  1  C4 þ 1  w4    ILm4
Cp1  Lm4 D D Cm4  Lm4

ðiÞ r4 1 C1 C2 C1
y4  k  ekt ¼ ðY4 þ y4  ekt Þ  þ  ð½ipðiÞ2 þ i0p2  ekt   ½ þ 
Lm4 C1  Lm4 D C p3 Cp2
C1 1 1
þ ½  ½w2 ðILm Þ þ w2 ðiLmk  ekt Þ þ  fw1 ðILm Þ þ w1 ðiLmk  ekt ÞgÞ
D Cp3 k Cp2 k

1 C C
 ½ðipðiÞ2 þ i0p2  ekt Þ  1  C4 þ 1  fw4 ðILm Þ þ w4 ðiLmk  ekt Þg
p p

Cp1  Lm4 D D k

1 ðiÞ
  ðILm þ iLm4  ekt Þ
Cm4  Lm4 4
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 741

ðiÞ r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
y4  k  ekt ¼ Y4  þ  ðiðiÞ  ½ þ þ ½  w ðI  Þ þ  w ðI  ÞÞ
Lm4 C1  Lm4 p2 D Cp3 Cp 2 D Cp 3 2 L m k Cp2 1 Lmk
1 Cp Cp 1 ðiÞ r4
  ½iðiÞ  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðILm Þ   I  y4  ekt 
Cp1  Lm4 p2 D D k Cm4  Lm4 Lm4 Lm4
1 C 1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
þ  ði0  ekt  ½ þ þ ½  w ðiL  ekt Þ þ  w ðiL  ekt ÞÞ
C1  Lm4 p2 D Cp3 Cp 2 D Cp 3 2 m k Cp 2 1 m k
1 Cp Cp 1
  ½i0  ekt  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðiLmk  ekt Þ   iL  ekt
Cp1  Lm4 p2 D D Cm 4  L m 4 m 4

At fixed points:

ðiÞ r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
 Y4  þ  ðipðiÞ2  ½ þ þ ½  w2 ðILm Þ þ  w ðI  ÞÞ
Lm4 C1  Lm4 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 k Cp2 1 Lmk
1 Cp Cp 1 ðiÞ
  ½iðiÞ  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðILm Þ  I ¼0
Cp1  Lm4 p2 D D k Cm4  Lm4 Lm4

r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1
y4  k  ekt ¼ y4  ekt  þ  ði0  ekt  ½ þ þ
Lm4 C1  Lm4 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D
1 1 1
½  w ðiL  ekt Þ þ  w ðiL  ekt ÞÞ 
Cp3 2 mk Cp2 1 mk Cp1  Lm4
C C 1
 ½i0p2  ekt  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðiLmk  ekt Þ   iL  ekt
p p
D D Cm4  Lm4 m4

r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1
 y4  k  y4  þ  ði0  ½ þ þ ½  w ðiL Þ
Lm4 C1  Lm4 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 mk
1 1 Cp Cp 1
þ  w1 ðiLmk ÞÞ   ½i0p2  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðiLmk Þ   iL ¼ 0
Cp2 Cp1  Lm4 D D Cm4  Lm4 m4

ðiÞ ðiÞ
iLm1  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y1 ¼ 0; iLm1  k þ y1 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
iLm2  k  ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y2 ¼ 0; iLm2  k þ y2 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
iLm3  k  ekt ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ; Y3 ¼ 0; iLm3  k þ y3 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
iLm4  k  ekt ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt ; Y4 ¼ 0; iLm4  k þ y4 ¼ 0

dis1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1 1 n2 n1 1
¼ ½ip2  ½ þ þ ½  w2 þ  w1    12  
dt D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 Cp2 C1  Rs n2 n2 Rs
dVs ðtÞ

dt
742 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

C1 C2 C1 C1 1
i0s1  k  ekt ¼ fðipðiÞ2 þ i0p2  ekt Þ  ½ þ þ ½  fw2 ðILm Þ
D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 k

1 1
þ w2 ðiLmk  ekt Þg þ  fw1 ðILm Þ þ w1 ðiLmk  ekt Þgg 
Cp2 k C1  Rs
n21 n1 1 dVs ðtÞ
   
n22 n2 Rs dt

C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
i0s1  k  ekt ¼ fðipðiÞ2 Þ  ½ þ þ ½  w ðI  Þ þ  w ðI  Þg
D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Lmk Cp2 1 Lmk
1 n2 n1 1 dVs ðtÞ C1 C2 C1
  12    f ! eg  fi0p2  ekt  ½ þ 
C1  Rs n2 n2 Rs dt D Cp3 Cp2
C1 1 1 1 n2
þ ½  w2 ðiLmk  ekt Þ þ  w1 ðiLmk  ekt Þg   12
D Cp3 Cp2 C1  Rs n2

ðiÞ
At fixed points: fðip2 Þ  CD1  ½CCp2 þ C1
Cp2  þ D
C1
 ½C1p  w2 ðILm Þ þ 1
Cp2  w1 ðILm Þg
3 3 k k
n21
1
C1 Rs  n22
¼0

C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1 1 n2
i0s1  k  ekt ¼ fi0p2  ekt  ½ þ þ ½  w2 ðiLmk  ekt Þ þ  w1 ðiLmk  ekt Þg   12
D C p3 C p2 D C p3 C p2 C1  Rs n2

C1 C 2 C1 C1 1 1 1 n2
i0s1  k  fi0p2  ½ þ þ ½  w2 ðiLmk Þ þ  w1 ðiLmk Þg   12 ¼ 0
D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 Cp2 C1  R s n 2

dip2 n2 1 C2 C2 C2 1
¼  42   fip2  ½  C4  þ ½  w  w4 g
dt n3 C2  Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 2

n24 1 C2 C2 C2 1
i0p2  k  ekt ¼    fðipðiÞ2 þ i0p2  ekt Þ  ½  C4  þ ½  fw2 ðILm Þ
n23 C2  Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 k

þ w2 ðiLmk  ekt Þg  fw4 ðILm Þ þ w4 ðiLmk  ekt Þgg


k

n24 1 C2 C2 C2 1
i0p2  k  ekt ¼    fipðiÞ2  ½  C4  þ ½  w ðI  Þ  w4 ðILm Þg
n23 C2  Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 2 Lmk k

n24 1 C2 C2 C2 1
   fi0p2  ekt  ½  C4  þ ½  w ðiL  ekt Þ
n23 C2  Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 2 mk
 w4 ðiLmk  ekt Þg

n2 ðiÞ
At fixed points:  n42  C2 R1 load  fip2  CD2  ½CCp2  C4  þ C2
D  ½C1p  w2 ðILm Þ
3 3 3 k

w4 ðILm Þg ¼ 0
k
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 743

n24 1 C2 C2 C2 1
i0p2  k    fi0p2  ½  C4  þ ½  w ðiL Þ  w4 ðiLmk Þg
n3 C2  Rload
2 D Cp3 D Cp3 2 mk
¼0

We can summery our Lattice crystal filter arbitrarily small increments equations:

1 Cp Cp r1 1
y1  k þ  ½i0  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðiLmk Þ  y1    iL ¼ 0
Cp1  Lm1 p2 D D Lm1 Cm1  Lm1 m1

r2 1 C1 1 1 1
 y2  k  y2  þ i0p2   þ ½  w ðiL Þ þ  w ðiL Þ
Lm2 D  Lm2 Cp2 Lm2  D Cp3 2 mk Cp2 1 mk
1 w2 ðiLmk Þ 1
    iL ¼ 0
Cp3  Lm2 D Cm2  Lm2 m2

1 C2 w2 ðiLmk Þ r3 1
y3  k þ  ½i0  þ   y3    iL ¼ 0
Cp3  Lm3 p2 D D Lm3 Cm3  Lm3 m3

r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1
 y4  k  y4  þ  ði0  ½ þ þ ½  w ðiL Þ
Lm4 C1  Lm4 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 mk
1 1 Cp Cp 1
þ  w ðiL ÞÞ   ½i0  1  C4 þ 1  w4 ðiLmk Þ   iL ¼ 0
Cp2 1 mk Cp1  Lm4 p2 D D Cm4  Lm4 m4

iLm1  k þ y1 ¼ 0; iLm2  k þ y2 ¼ 0; iLm3  k þ y3 ¼ 0; iLm4  k þ y4 ¼ 0

C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1 1 n2
i0s1  k  fi0p2  ½ þ þ ½  w2 ðiLmk Þ þ  w1 ðiLmk Þg   12 ¼ 0
D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 Cp2 C1  Rs n2

n24 1 C2 C2 C2 1
i0p2  k    fi0p2  ½  C4  þ ½  w ðiL Þ  w4 ðiLmk Þg ¼ 0
n23 C2  Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 2 mk

0 1
y1
B y C
B 2C
B C
B y3 C
B C
B C
0 1 BB y 4 C
N11 . . . N1 10 C
B iLm C
B .. .. B
.. C  B C r1
C
1
@ . . . A B iLm C ¼ 0; N11 ¼ k  L ; N12 ¼ N13 ¼ N14 ¼ 0
B 2C m1
N10    N10 10 B C
1
B iLm3 C
B C
Bi C
B L m4 C
B C
B i0 C
@ s1 A
i0p2
744 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

Remark Reader exercise to find N15 ; N16 ; N17 ; N18 . N19 ¼ 0; N1 10 ¼ Lm1 D  C4
1

r2 1 C1
N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ k  ; N23 ¼ N24 ¼ 0; N29 ¼ 0; N2 10 ¼ 
Lm2 D  Lm2 Cp2

Remark Reader exercise to find N25 ; N26 ; N27 ; N28 .

r3 1 C2
N31 ¼ N32 ¼ 0; N33 ¼ k  ; N34 ¼ 0; N39 ¼ 0; N3 10 ¼ 
Lm3 Cp3  Lm3 D

Remark Reader exercise to find N35 ; N36 ; N37 ; N38 .


r4
N41 ¼ N42 ¼ N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k  ; N49 ¼ 0; N4 10
Lm4
1 C2 C1 1
¼ ½ þ   C4
Lm4  D Cp3 Cp2 Lm4  D

Remark Reader exercise to find N45 ; N46 ; N47 ; N48 .

N51 ¼ 1; N52 ¼ N53 ¼ N54 ¼ 0; N55 ¼ k; N56 ¼ . . . ¼ N5 10 ¼ 0; N61 ¼ 0; N62 ¼ 1

N63 ¼ N64 ¼ 0; N65 ¼ 0; N66 ¼ k; N67 ¼ . . . ¼ N6 10 ¼ 0; N71 ¼ N72 ¼ 0; N73 ¼ 1; N74 ¼ 0
N75 ¼ N76 ¼ 0; N77 ¼ k; N78 ¼ N79 ¼ N7 10 ¼ 0; N81 ¼ N82 ¼ N83 ¼ 0; N84 ¼ 1

N85 ¼ N86 ¼ N87 ¼ 0; N88 ¼ k; N89 ¼ N8 10 ¼ 0; N91 ¼ . . . ¼ N94 ¼ 0; N99 ¼ k

C1 C2 C1 1 n2
N9 10 ¼ ½ þ   12 :
D Cp3 Cp2 C1  Rs n2

Remark: Reader exercise to find N95 ; N96 ; N97 ; N98 .

n24 1 C2
N10 1 ¼ . . . ¼ N10 4 ¼ 0; N10 9 ¼ 0; N10 10 ¼ k   ½  C4 :
n3 Rload  D Cp3
2

Remark Reader exercise to find N10 5 ; N10 6 ; N10 7 ; N10 8 .


0 1
N11 ... N1 10
B C
ðA  k  IÞ ¼ @ ... ..
.
..
. A; detðA  k  IÞ
N010 1  N10 10 1
N11 . . . N1 10
B .. .. .. C ¼ 0
¼ det@ . . . A
N10 1    N10 10
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 745

X
10 X
10
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ !k  kk ; !k  kk ¼ 0:
k¼0 k¼0

Remark It is reader exercise to find the expressions for !k 8 k ¼ 0; 1; . . .; 10.


Eigenvalues stability discussion: Our Lattice crystal filter circuit involving N
variables (N > 2, N = 10, arbitrarily small increments), the characteristic equation
is of degree N = 10 and must often be solved numerically. Expect in some par-
ticular cases, such an equation has (N = 10) distinct roots that can be real or
complex. These values are the eigenvalues of the (10  10) Jacobian matrix (A).
The general rule is that the Lattice crystal filter circuit is stable if there is no
eigenvalue with positive real part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is positive for
the steady state to be unstable [3, 4]. Our 10-variables (y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ; iLm1 ; iLm2 ; iLm3 ;
iLm4 ; i0s1 ; i0p2 ) system has ten eigenvalues (ten system’s arbitrarily small increments).
The type of behavior can be characterized as a function of the position of these
eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be distinguished:
(1) the ten eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), (2) the ten
eigenvalues are real, at least one of them is positive (unstable steady state), (3) and
(4) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and other
eigenvalues real are negative (stable steady state), two cases can be distinguished
depending on the relative value of the real part of the complex eigenvalues and of
the real one, (5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part
and at least one of the other eigenvalues real is positive (unstable steady state).

X
10 X
10
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ !k  kk ; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) !k  kk ¼ 0
k¼0 k¼0

7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability


Analysis

We have circuit which represents a tunable BPF employing varactor diodes. It is


ideal for many diverse wireless applications. There are two types of tunable BPF
employing varactor diodes; top inductively coupled variable BPF and capacitive
coupled variable band pass filter. The best for wideband applications is the top
inductively coupled variable band pass filter. In that subchapter we discuss the
stability analysis of capacitive coupled variable BPF (employing varactor diodes).
The design of the basic top capacitive coupled BPF is based on selecting a center
frequency for the top capacitive coupled BPF at either the high and, low end, or
middle of the tunable range of the desired bandpass frequencies, depending on the
initial tuning voltages we supply to the tuning capacitors. The circuit includes
varactor diodes (Cv) and CT capacitors, bias resistors R1 and R2, R1 resistor isolates
the two varactors (Cv) from the effects of each other, and resistor R2 represents a
746 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

direct RF short to ground through Vtune. Capacitor CT blocks the DC inserted by


Vtune from being shorted by L1 or L2. Varactor diodes (Cv) supply the variable
tuning capacitance. Capacitor Cc couples the two tank circuits consisting of L1 and
CT/Cv, and L2 and CT/Cv. The capacitance of the series combination of CT and Cv
in series is CCTTþCCv v . The capacitor CT mainly functioning as a DC blocking capacitor,
while Cv, the varactor is supplying all of the tuning capacitance for the filter’s tanks.
By applying positive tuning voltage Vtune, we allow the varactor to either linearly
tune the filter to its maximum and minimum values or, by supplying Vtune with
discrete voltages it filter the incoming RF/Microwave signal in discrete steps. Due
to parasitic capacitances and inductances at these frequencies we need to optimize
our filter and investigate his stability. Input RF/Microwave signal is Vs(t) and his
series resistance Rs. Typical varactors are limited in the value of their maximum
capacitance, and in case we want to operate our tunable BPF at low frequencies
region, then we need to increase the capacitance of CT and Cv combination and it is
done by adding capacitor Cs in shunt with CT and Cv which will increase the
capacitance in each leg to Cs þ CCTTþCCv v . The circuit load resistance Rload is connected
in our tunable BPF circuit (parallel to inductor L2) [25, 26].

Varactor diode: Varactor diode is an electronic component whose reactance can


be varied, usually electronically. Varactor diode is a variable capacitance diode.
Other names of varactors are varicap, tuning diode, and voltage variable capacitor.
Varactors are integral part in many RF and microwave circuits. The capacitance of a
varactor can be controlled electronically and automatic circuit tuning becomes
practical. A varactor is a diode in which P and N regions are doped in such a
manner that the capacitance that normally forms near the PN junction can be
precisely controlled by a reverse bias voltage. There is an inverse relationship
between the capacitance of the varactor and the applied voltage; a small reverse bias

Fig. 7.9 Tunable BPF employing varactor diodes


7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 747

voltage gives a big capacitance, and a large reverse bias voltage gives a small
capacitance. The varactor capacitance is changed as a function of the bias voltage.
There are two circuits’ models of varactor diode, high frequency circuit model and
low frequency circuit model. High frequency circuit model: Ls is the lead induc-
tance and Cc is the package inductance. These components of the model only
become significant at very high frequencies. Cj is the junction capacitance which
varies with applied voltage according to equation Cj ðVÞ ¼ ð1 þC0V Þn . V0 is the junc-
V0

tion potential with no bias voltage applied and is usually in the range of 0.5–0.7 v.
It can be determined by measuring the voltage drop across the diode when it is
conducting under forward bias. C0 is the capacitance with zero bias voltage. The
exponent n is dependent on the doping profile: n = 1/3 for a graded junction,
n = 1/2 for an abrupt junction, and n = 1 to n = 2 for hyperabrupt junction. V is the
applied voltage and is positive for reverse bias and negative for forward bias.
The Cj ðVÞ ¼ . . . equation does apply for forward bias voltages but only up to
about V ¼ V20 . It is possible to derive an expression for C0 but in practice the value
of C0 usually has to be determined experimentally. The series resistance, Rs, is due
to the resistance of the semiconductor material of which the diode is made as well
as any lead and contact resistance. The part of the diode which is not part of the
depletion region contributes to this resistance. Rs is a function of the bias voltage.
As reverse bias is increased, the depletion region gets larger and Rs gets smaller and
vice versa. The parallel resistance Rp represents the reverse leakage current. It is in
general varying somewhat with the applied voltage and becoming smaller very
rapidly near the reverse breakdown voltage. The low frequency model for a varactor
is as follow:

Fig. 7.10 High frequency circuit model for a varactor

Fig. 7.11 Low frequency model for a varactor


748 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

Fig. 7.12 Tunable BPF employing varactor diodes equivalent circuit

The Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) equivalent circuit is present in the below
figure. We consider Vs(t) low frequency RF source. We use varactor low frequency
model in our analysis.

Vs ðtÞ  VA1 dIL


IR s ¼ ; VA1 ¼ L1  1 ;
Rs dt
dVA1 dðVA1  VA2 Þ
ICs ðtank1Þ ¼ Cs  ; ICT ðtank1Þ ¼ CT 
dt dt
dðVA2  VA3 Þ VA2  VA3
ICj1 ¼ Cj1  ; IRp1 ¼ ;
dt Rp1
VA dðVA1  VA6 Þ
IRs1 ¼ 3 ; ICc ¼ Cc 
R s1 dt

dðVA6  VA4 Þ dðVA4  VA5 Þ VA  VA5


ICT ðtank2Þ ¼ CT  ; ICj2 ¼ Cj2  ; IRp2 ¼ 4 ; IRs2
dt dt Rp2
VA5
¼
Rs2

dVA6 dIL VA6


ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ Cs  ; VA6 ¼ L2  2 ; IRload ¼ ; VL1 ¼ VCs ðtank1Þ ¼ VA1
dt dt Rload

Vtune  VA7 VA  VA2


VCs ðtank2Þ ¼ VL2 ¼ VRload ¼ VA6 ; IR2 ¼ ; IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ 7 ; IR1 ðtank2Þ
R2 R1
VA7  VA4
¼
R1
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 749

VA2 is the applied voltage to varactor diode D1. VA4 is the applied voltage to
varactor diode D2.

C0 C0
Cj1 ðVA2 Þ ¼ VA2 n ; Cj1 ðVA4 Þ ¼ VA4 n ; ICj 1 þ IRp 1 ¼ IRs 1 ; ICj 2 þ IRp 2 ¼ IRs 2
ð1 þ V0 Þ ð1 þ V0 Þ

X
2
IR2 ¼ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ IR1 ðtankiÞ
i¼1

KCL @ node A 1: IRs ¼ IL1 þ ICs ðtank1Þ þ ICT ðtank1Þ þ ICc .


KCL @ node A 6: ICc ¼ ICT ðtank2Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ þ IL2 þ IRload
KCL @ node A 2: ICT ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ ICj1 þ IRp1
KCL @ node A 4: ICT ðtank2Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ ICj2 þ IRp2

dVA1 d dIL d 2 IL
ICs ðtank1Þ ¼ Cs  ¼ Cs  ðL1  1 Þ ¼ Cs  L1  2 1 ; VA1
Zdt dt dt dt
1
¼  ICs ðtank1Þ  dt
Cs
Z
dðVA1  VA2 Þ 1
ICT ðtank1Þ ¼ CT  ) VA1  VA2 ¼  ICT ðtank1Þ  dt;
dt CT
Z
1
VA2 ¼ VA1   ICT ðtank1Þ  dt
CT
Z
dIL 1 dðVA2  VA3 Þ
VA2 ¼ L1  1   ICT ðtank1Þ  dt; ICj1 ¼ Cj1 
dt CT dt
Z
1
) VA2  VA3 ¼  ICj1  dt
Cj1
Z Z Z
1 dIL1 1 1
VA3 ¼ VA2   ICj1  dt ¼ L1    ICT ðtank1Þ  dt   ICj1  dt
Cj1 dt CT Cj1
Z
VA  VA3 1
IRp1 ¼ 2 ) VA2  VA3 ¼ IRp1  Rp1 ; IRp1  Rp1 ¼  ICj1  dt
Rp1 Cj1
Z
d 1 dIRp1 1 dIRp1 1
fIR  Rp1 ¼  ICj1  dtg )  Rp1 ¼  ICj1 ) ¼  ICj1
dt p1 Cj1 dt Cj1 dt Cj1  Rp1

VA3
IRs1 ¼ ) VA3 ¼ IRs1  Rs1 ; IRs1  Rs1
Rs1 Z Z
dIL 1 1
¼ L1  1   ICT ðtank1Þ  dt   ICj1  dt
dt CT Cj1
750 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dIRs1 d 2 IL 1 1 dIRs1 1 1
 Rs1 ¼ L 1  2 1   ICT ðtank1Þ   ICj1 ; ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   ICT ðtank1Þ
dt dt CT Cj1 dt C s  Rs1 C T  Rs1
1
  ICj1
Cj1  Rs1
Z
dðVA1  VA6 Þ 1
ICc ¼ Cc  ) VA 1  VA 6 ¼  ICc  dt
dt Cc
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA6 ¼ VA1   ICc  dt ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ  dt   ICc  dt
Cc Cs Cc
Z
dðVA6  VA4 Þ 1
ICT ðtank2Þ ¼ CT  ) VA6  VA4 ¼  ICT ðtank2Þ  dt;
dt CT
Z
1
VA4 ¼ VA6   ICT ðtank2Þ  dt
C
Z T Z
1 1
VA4 ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ  dt   ICc  dt
Cs Cc
Z
1
  ICT ðtank2Þ  dt
CT
Z
dðVA4  VA5 Þ 1
ICj2 ¼ Cj2  ) VA4  VA5 ¼  ICj2  dt ) VA5
dtZ Cj2
1
¼ VA4   ICj2  dt
Cj2
Z Z Z Z
1 1 1 1
VA5 ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ  dt   ICc  dt   ICT ðtank2Þ  dt   ICj2
Cs Cc CT Cj2
 dt

VA4  VA5
IRp2 ¼ ) VA4  VA5 ¼ IRp2  Rp2 ) IRp2  Rp2
Rp2
Z
1 dIRp2 1
¼  ICj2  dt; ¼  ICj2
Cj2 dt Cj2  Rp2
Z
VA5 1
IRs2 ¼ ) VA5 ¼ IRs2  Rs2 ; IRs2  Rs2 ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ  dt
Rs2 Cs
Z Z Z
1 1 1
  ICc  dt   ICT ðtank2Þ  dt   ICj2  dt
Cc CT Cj2
Z Z
d 1 1
fIR  Rs2 ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ  dt   ICc  dt
dt s2 Cs Cc
Z Z
1 1
  ICT ðtank2Þ  dt   ICj2  dtg
CT Cj2

dIRs2 1 1 1 1
 Rs2 ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   ICc   ICT ðtank2Þ   ICj2
dt Cs Cc CT Cj2
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 751

Z Z
dVA6 1 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ Cs  ) VA6 ¼  ICs ðtank2Þ  dt;  ICs ðtank2Þ  dt
dt Cs Cs
Z Z
1 1
¼  ICs ðtank1Þ  dt   ICc  dt
C C
Z s Z c Z
d 1 1 1
f  ICs ðtank2Þ  dt ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ  dt   ICc  dtg;
dt Cs Cs Cc
1 1 1
 ICs ðtank2Þ ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   ICc
Cs Cs Cc
dVA6 d dIL d 2 IL
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ Cs  ¼ Cs  ðL2  2 Þ ¼ Cs  L2  2 2 ;
dt dt dt dt
VA6
IRload ¼ ) VA6 ¼ IRload  Rload
Rload

dIL2 dIL Rload Vtune  VA7


VA6 ¼ IRload  Rload ¼ L2  ) 2 ¼ IRload  ; IR 2 ¼ ) VA7
dt dt L2 R2
¼ Vtune  IR2  R2

1 d 2 IL dIR d 2 IL dIR 1
 ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ L2  2 2 ; load  Rload ¼ L2  2 2 ; load ¼  ICs ðtank2Þ
Cs dt dt dt dt Cs  Rload

VA7  VA2
IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ ) IR1 ðtank1Þ  R1 ¼ VA7  VA2 ;
R1
Z
dIL 1
IR1 ðtank1Þ  R1 ¼ Vtune  IR2  R2  L1  1 þ  ICT ðtank1Þ  dt
dt CT
Z
d dIL1 1
fIR ðtank1Þ  R1 ¼ Vtune  IR2  R2  L1  þ  ICT ðtank1Þ  dtg
dt 1 dt CT

dIR1 ðtank1Þ dVtune dIR2 d 2 IL 1


 R1 ¼   R2  L1  2 1 þ  ICT ðtank1Þ ; IR1 ðtank2Þ
dt dt dt dt CT
VA  VA4
¼ 7
R1
VA7  VA4
IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ ) VA7  VA4 ¼ IR1 ðtank2Þ  R1
R1

dIR1 ðtank2Þ dVtune dIR2 1 1 1


 R1 ¼   R2   ICs ðtank1Þ þ  ICc þ  ICT ðtank2Þ
dt dt dt Cs Cc CT
dIR1 ðtank1Þ dI
We consider that IR1 ðtank1Þ  IR1 ðtank2Þ ; dt  R1dtðtank2Þ . Vtune Is a DC voltage
dIR1 ðtank1Þ dIR2 d2 I
then dVtune
dt ¼ 0. dt  R1 þ dt  R2 ¼ L1  dt2L1 þ C1T  ICT ðtank1Þ .
752 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dIR1 ðtank2Þ dIR2 1 1 1


 R1 þ  R2 ¼   ICs ðtank1Þ þ  I Cc þ  ICT ðtank2Þ
dt dt Cs Cc CT

dIR1 ðtank1Þ dIR2 dIR1 ðtank2Þ dIR2


 R1 þ  R2   R1 þ  R2
dt dt dt dt
d 2 IL 1 1 1 1
) L1  2 1 þ  ICT ðtank1Þ ¼   ICs ðtank1Þ þ  I Cc þ  ICT ðtank2Þ
dt CT Cs Cc CT

d 2 I L1 1 1 1 1
L1    ICT ðtank1Þ ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   ICc   ICT ðtank2Þ
dt2 CT Cs Cc CT

d 2 IL1 dIL1 d 2 IL1


We define new variables: ICs ðtank1Þ ¼ Cs  L1  dt2 ; Y1 ¼ dt ; dY1
dt ¼ dt2

dY1 1
¼  ICs ðtank1Þ
dt Cs  L1

Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) differential equations group No. 1:

dIL1 dY1 1 dIRp1 1


¼ Y1 ; ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ ; ¼  ICj1
dt dt Cs  L1 dt Cj1  Rp1

dIRs1 1 1 1
¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   ICT ðtank1Þ   ICj1
dt Cs  Rs1 CT  Rs1 Cj1  Rs1

dIRp2 1 dIRs2 1
¼  ICj2 ; ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ
dt Cj2  Rp2 dt Cs  Rs2
1 1 1
  I Cc   ICT ðtank2Þ   ICj2
Cc  Rs2 CT  Rs2 Cj2  Rs2
dIL2 Rload dIRload 1
¼ IRload  ; ¼  ICs ðtank2Þ
dt L2 dt Cs  Rload

Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) KCL equations:

1 1 1
 ICs ðtank2Þ ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   ICc ; IRs ¼ IL1 þ ICs ðtank1Þ þ ICT ðtank1Þ þ ICc
Cs Cs Cc

ICc ¼ ICT ðtank2Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ þ IL2 þ IRload ; ICT ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ ICj1 þ IRp1

ICT ðtank2Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ ICj2 þ IRp2 ; ICj1 þ IRp1 ¼ IRs1 ; ICj2 þ IRp2 ¼ IRs2
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 753

X
2
IR2 ¼ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ IR1 ðtankiÞ
i¼1

ICj1 þ IRp1 ¼ IRs1 ) ICj1 ¼ IRs1  IRp1 ; ICj2 þ IRp2 ¼ IRs2 ) ICj2 ¼ IRs2  IRp2

ICT ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ ICj1 þ IRp1 ¼ IRs1 ; ICT ðtank2Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ ICj2 þ IRp2 ¼ IRs2

Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) differential equations group No. 2:

dIL1 dY1 1 dIRp1 1


¼ Y1 ; ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ ; ¼  ðIRs1  IRp1 Þ
dt dt Cs  L1 dt Cj1  Rp1

dIRs1 1 1 1
¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   ICT ðtank1Þ   ðIRs1  IRp1 Þ;
dt Cs  Rs1 CT  Rs1 Cj1  Rs1
dIRp2 1
¼  ðIRs2  IRp2 Þ
dt Cj2  Rp2
dIRs2 1 1 1 1
¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   I Cc   ICT ðtank2Þ 
dt Cs  Rs2 Cc  Rs2 CT  Rs2 Cj2  Rs2
 ðIRs2  IRp2 Þ

dIL2 Rload dIRload 1


¼ IRload  ; ¼  ICs ðtank2Þ
dt L2 dt Cs  Rload

ICT ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs1 ) ICT ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs1  IR1 ðtank1Þ ; ICT ðtank2Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ IRs2
) ICT ðtank2Þ ¼ IRs2  IR1 ðtank2Þ

Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) differential equations group No. 3:

dIL1 dY1 1 dIRp1 1


¼ Y1 ; ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ ; ¼  ðIRs1  IRp1 Þ
dt dt Cs  L1 dt Cj1  Rp1

dIRs1 1 1
¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   ðIRs1  IR1 ðtank1Þ Þ
dt Cs  Rs1 CT  Rs1
1 dIRp2 1
  ðIRs1  IRp1 Þ; ¼  ðIRs2  IRp2 Þ
Cj1  Rs1 dt Cj2  Rp2
dIRs2 1 1 1
¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   I Cc   ðIRs2  IR1 ðtank2Þ Þ
dt Cs  Rs2 Cc  Rs2 CT  Rs2
1
  ðIRs2  IRp2 Þ
Cj2  Rs2
754 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dIL2 Rload dIRload 1


¼ IRload  ; ¼  ICs ðtank2Þ
dt L2 dt Cs  Rload

&&&

IRs ¼ IL1 þ ICs ðtank1Þ þ ICT ðtank1Þ þ ICc ; ICc ¼ ICT ðtank2Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ þ IL2 þ IRload ;
1 1 1
 ICs ðtank2Þ ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   ICc
Cs Cs Cc
ICc ¼ IRs  IL1  ICs ðtank1Þ  ICT ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs  IL1  ICs ðtank1Þ  IRs1 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ

IRs  IL1  ICs ðtank1Þ  IRs1 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs2  IR1 ðtank2Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ þ IL2 þ IRload

IRs  IL1  IL2  IRs1  IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  IRload ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ

X
2 X
2 X
2
IR s  I Lk  IRsi þ IR1 ðtankiÞ  IRload ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ
k¼1 i¼1 i¼1

1 1 1
 ICs ðtank2Þ ¼  ICs ðtank1Þ   ðIRs  IL1  ICs ðtank1Þ  IRs1 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ Þ
Cs Cs Cc

1 1 1 1
  IRs þ  I L1 þ  IRs1   IR1 ðtank1Þ
Cc Cc Cc Cc
1 1 1
¼  ICs ðtank2Þ  ð þ Þ  ICs ðtank1Þ
Cs Cs Cc

X
2 X
2 X
2
ICs ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs  I Lk  IRsi þ IR1 ðtankiÞ  IRload  ICs ðtank2Þ
k¼1 i¼1 i¼1

1 1 1 1 1
  IRs þ  IL þ  IRs1   IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼  ICs ðtank2Þ
Cc Cc 1 Cc Cc Cs
1 1 X 2 X2 X2
 ð þ Þ  ½IRs  I Lk  IRsi þ IR1 ðtankiÞ  IRload  ICs ðtank2Þ 
Cs Cc k¼1 i¼1 i¼1

1 1 1 1 1
  IRs þ  I L1 þ  IRs1   IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼  ICs ðtank2Þ
Cc Cc Cc Cc Cs
1 1 1 1 X 2
1 1 X 2
1 1
 ð þ Þ  IRs þ ð þ Þ  ILk þ ð þ Þ  IR  ð þ Þ
Cs Cc Cs Cc k¼1 Cs Cc i¼1 si Cs Cc
X
2
1 1 1 1
 IR1 ðtankiÞ þ ð þ Þ  IRload þ ð þ Þ  ICs ðtank2Þ
i¼1
Cs Cc Cs Cc
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 755

2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ð þ Þ  ICs ðtank2Þ ¼   IRs þ  IL þ  IRs1   IR1 ðtank1Þ þ ð þ Þ
Cs Cc Cc Cc 1 Cc Cc Cs Cc
X2
1 1 1 1 X 2
 IR1 ðtankiÞ þ ð þ Þ  IRs  ð þ Þ  IL
i¼1
Cs Cc Cs Cc k¼1 k
1 1 X 2
1 1
ð þ Þ IRsi  ð þ Þ  IRload
Cs Cc i¼1 Cs Cc

2 1 1 1 1 1
ð þ Þ  ICs ðtank2Þ ¼  IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  ð þ Þ
Cs Cc Cs Cs Cs Cc
1 1 1 1 1 1
  IL1  ð þ Þ  IL2   IRs1  ð þ Þ
Cs Cs Cc Cs Cs Cc
1 1
 IRs2  ð þ Þ  IRload
Cs Cc

1 1 ðC1s þ Cc Þ
1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼  IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  þ IR1 ðtank2Þ 
ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
 Cs ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
 Cs ðC2s þ C1c Þ
1 ðC1s þ Cc Þ
1
1 ð1 þ Cc Þ
1
  I L1   I L2   IRs1  C2s
Cs  ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
Cs  ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
ð Cs þ Cc Þ
1

ðC1s þ C1c Þ
 IRs2   IRload
ðC2s þ C1c Þ

1 1 ðCc þ Cs Þ
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼  IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  þ IR1 ðtank2Þ 
ð2 þ Cc Þ
Cs
ð2 þ Cc Þ
Cs ð2  Cc þ Cs Þ
1 ðCc þ Cs Þ 1
  IL1   IL   IR
ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2  Cc þ Cs Þ 2 ð2 þ CCs Þ s1
c

ðCc þ Cs Þ ðCc þ Cs Þ
  I R s2   IR
ð2  Cc þ Cs Þ ð2  Cc þ Cs Þ load
756 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

ðC1s þ Cc Þ
1
ðC1s þ Cc Þ
1
Cs  Cc ðCc þ Cs Þ
C1 ¼ C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ ¼ ¼  ¼
ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1 Cs  Cc ð2  Cc þ Cs Þ

1 1 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼  IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ   I L1
ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1
 C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ  IL2   IRs1  C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ  IRs2  C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ  IRload
ð2 þ CCcs Þ

1 1
ICs ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs þ ½  1  IL1 þ ½C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ  1  IL2 þ ½  1  IRs1
ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1
þ ½C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ  1  IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  ½1   þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1
 ½1  C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ þ ½C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ  1  IRload   IRs
ð2 þ CCcs Þ

1 1
C2 ¼ C2 ðCs ; Cc Þ ¼ 1  Cs ; C2 ¼ C2 ðCs ; Cc Þ ¼ 1
ð2 þ Cc Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
C3 ¼ C3 ðCc ; Cs Þ ¼ 1  C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ; C3 ¼ C3 ðCc ; Cs Þ ¼ C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ  1

ICs ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs  C2  IL1  C3  IL2  C2  IRs1  C3  IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
1
 C3  C3  IRload   IRs
ð2 þ CCcs Þ

1 1 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼  IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  C1   I L1
ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1
 C1  IL2   IRs1  C1  IRs2  C1  IRload
ð2 þ CCcs Þ

Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) differential equations group No. 4:

dIL1 dY1 1
¼ Y1 ; ¼  fIRs  C2  IL1  C3  IL2  C2  IRs1  C3  IRs2
dt dt Cs  L1
1
þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3  C3  IRload   IRs g;
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
dIRp1 1
¼  ðIRs1  IRp1 Þ
dt Cj1  Rp1
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 757

dIRs1 1
¼  ðIRs  C2  IL1  C3  IL2  C2  IRs1  C3  IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  C2
dt Cs  Rs1
1 1
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3 C3  IRload   IR s Þ   ðIRs1  IR1 ðtank1Þ Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ C T  Rs1
1 dIRp2 1
  ðIRs1  IRp1 Þ; ¼  ðIRs2  IRp2 Þ
Cj1  Rs1 dt Cj2  Rp2
dIRs2 1
¼  ðIRs  C2  IL1  C3  IL2  C2  IRs1  C3  IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
dt Cs  Rs2
1 1 1
 C3  C3  IRload  Cs  IRs Þ  C  R  ICc  C  R  ðIRs2  IR1 ðtank2Þ Þ
ð2 þ Cc Þ c s2 T s2

1
  ðIRs2  IRp2 Þ
Cj2  Rs2

dIL2 Rload dIRload 1 1 1


¼ IRload  ; ¼ f  IR þ IR1 ðtank1Þ 
dt L2 dt Cs  Rload ð2 þ CCs Þ s ð2 þ Cc Þ
Cs
c

1 1
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  C1  Cs  IL1  C1  IL2 
ð2 þ Cc Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
 IRs1  C1  IRs2  C1  IRload g

ICc ¼ IRs  IL1  ICs ðtank1Þ  IRs1 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ


¼ IRs  IL1  fIRs  C2  IL1  C3  IL2  C2  IRs1
 C3  IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3  C3  IRload
1
  IRs g  IRs1 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ

ICc ¼ IRs  IL1  IRs þ C2  IL1 þ C3  IL2 þ C2  IRs 1 þ C3  IRs 2  IR1 ðtank1Þ  C2
1
 IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3 þ C3  IRload þ  IRs  IRs 1 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1
ICc ¼ ½1 þ   IRs þ ½C2  1  IL1  IRs þ C3  IL2 þ ½C2  1  IRs 1 þ C3  IRs 2
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
 IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3 þ C3  IRload þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  ½1  C2 

Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) differential equations group No. 5:

dIL1 dY1 1
¼ Y1 ; ¼  fIRs  C2  IL1  C3  IL2  C2  IRs1  C3  IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  C2
dt dt Cs  L1
1 dIRp1 1
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3  C3  IRload   IRs g; ¼  ðIRs1  IRp1 Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ dt Cj1  Rp1
758 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

dIRs1 1
¼  ðIRs  C2  IL1  C3  IL2  C2  IRs1  C3  IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ
dt Cs  Rs1
1 1 1
 C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3 C3  IRload   IRs Þ   ðIRs1  IR1 ðtank1Þ Þ 
ð2 þ CCcs Þ CT  Rs1 Cj1  Rs1
dIRp2 1
 ðIRs1  IRp1 Þ; ¼  ðIRs2  IRp2 Þ
dt Cj2  Rp2
dIRs2 1
¼  ðIRs  C2  IL1  C3  IL2  C2  IRs1  C3  IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ
dt Cs  Rs2
1 1 1
 C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3  C3  IRload   IRs Þ   f½1 þ   IRs
ð2 þ Cc Þ
Cs C c  R s2 ð2 þ CCcs Þ
þ ½C2  1  IL1  IRs þ C3  IL2 þ ½C2  1  IRs1 þ C3  IRs2
1
IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3 þ C3  IRload þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  ½1  C2 g   ðIRs2  IR1 ðtank2Þ Þ
CT  Rs2
1
  ðIRs2  IRp2 Þ
Cj2  Rs2

dIL2 Rload dIRload 1 1 1


¼ IRload  ; ¼ f  IR þ IR1 ðtank1Þ 
dt L2 dt Cs  Rload ð2 þ CCs Þ s ð2 þ CCs Þ
c c

1 1
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  C1   IL1  C1  IL2   IRs1  C1  IRs2  C1  IRload g
ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ

Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) differential equations group No. 6:

dY1 1 1 1 1
¼  IR s   C2  IL1   C 3  I L2   C2
dt Cs  L1 Cs  L1 Cs  L1 Cs  L1
1 1 1
 IRs1   C3  IRs2 þ  IR1 ðtank1Þ  C2 þ  IR1 ðtank2Þ
Cs  L1 Cs  L1 Cs  L1
1 1 1
 C3   C3  IRload    IR
Cs  L1 Cs  L1 ð2 þ CCs Þ s
c

dIRp1 1 1 dIL
¼  IRs1   IRp1 ; 1 ¼ Y1
dt Cj1  Rp1 Cj1  Rp1 dt
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 759

dIRs1 1 1 1 1
¼ ½1    IRs   C 2  I L1   C3  IL2
dt ð2 þ C Þ Cs  Rs1
C s
c
Cs  Rs1 Cs  Rs1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 ½  C2 þ þ   I R s1   C3  IRs2 þ ½  C2 þ 
Cs CT Cj1 Rs1 Cs  Rs1 Cs CT
1
  IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
Rs1
1 1 1
  C3   C3  IRload þ  I R p1
Cs  Rs1 Cs  Rs1 Cj1  Rs1
dIRp2 1 1
¼  IRs2   IRp2
dt Cj2  Rp2 Cj2  Rp2

dIRs2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
¼f     ½1 þ Cs  þ C g  R  IRs
dt Cs Cs ð2 þ CCs Þ Cc ð2 þ Cc Þ c s2
c

1 1 1 1 1 1
ð  C2 þ  ½C2  1Þ   IL1  ð þ Þ   C3  IL2
Cs Cc Rs2 Cs Cc Rs2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 ð  C2 þ  ½C2  1Þ   IRs1  ð  C3 þ  C3 þ þ Þ
Cs Cc Rs2 Cs Cc Cj2 CT
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  IRs2 þ ð  C2   ½1  C2 Þ   IR1 ðtank1Þ þ ð  C3 þ þ  C3 Þ
Rs2 Cs Cc Rs2 Cc CT Cs
1 1 1 1 1
  IR1 ðtank2Þ  ð þ Þ  C3   IRload þ  IRp2
Rs2 Cc Cs Rs2 Cj2  Rs2

dIL2 Rload dIRload 1 1 1 1


¼ IRload  ; ¼   IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  
dt L2 dt Cs  Rload ð2 þ C Þ
C s Cs  Rload ð2 þ CCs Þ
c c

1 1 1 1
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ   C1    IL   C1  IL2
Cs  Rload Cs  Rload ð2 þ CCs Þ 1 Cs  Rload
c

1 1 1 1
   IRs1   C1  IRs2   C1  IRload
Cs  Rload ð2 þ C Þ
C s Cs  Rload Cs  Rload
c

We define for simplicity new global parameters:

1 1 1 1 1
X1 ¼ ; X2 ¼ ; X3 ¼ ½1   ; X4 ¼  C2 ;
Cs  L1 Cj1  Rp1 ð2 þ CCs Þ Cs  Rs1 Cs  Rs1
c

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
X5 ¼  C3 ; X6 ¼ ½  C2 þ þ  ; X7 ¼ ½  C2 þ   ;
Cs  Rs1 Cs CT Cj1 Rs1 Cs CT Rs1
1
X8 ¼
Cj1  Rs1
760 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
X9 ¼ ; X10 ¼ f     ½1 þ þ g 
Cj2  Rp2 Cs Cs ð2 þ CCs Þ Cc ð2 þ Cs
Cc Þ C c R s2
c

1 1 1 1 1 1
X11 ¼ ð  C2 þ  ½C2  1Þ  ; X12 ¼ ð þ Þ   C3
Cs Cc Rs2 Cs Cc Rs2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
X13 ¼ ð  C3 þ  C3 þ þ Þ ; X14 ¼ ð  C3 þ þ  C3 Þ 
Cs Cc Cj2 CT Rs2 Cc CT Cs R s2

1 1 1 1
X15 ¼ ; X16 ¼  ; X17 ¼  C1
Cj2  Rs2 Cs  Rload ð2 þ CCs Þ Cs  Rload
c

Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) differential equations group No. 7:

dY1
¼ X1  IRs  X1  C2  IL1  X1  C3  IL2  X1  C2  IRs1  X1  C3  IRs2
dt
1
þ X1  IR1 ðtank1Þ  C2 þ X1  IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3  X1  C3  IRload  X1   IRs
ð2 þ CCcs Þ

dIRp1 dIL dIRp2 dIL


¼ X2  IRs1  X2  IRp1 ; 1 ¼ Y1 ; ¼ X9  IRs2  X9  IRp2 ; 2
dt dt dt dt
Rload
¼ IRload 
L2

dIRs1
¼ X3  IRs  X4  IL1  X5  IL2  X6  IRs1  X5  IRs2 þ X7
dt
 IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  X5  X5  IRload þ X8  IRp1

dIRs2
¼ X10  IRs  X11  IL1  X12  IL2  X11  IRs1  X13  IRs2 þ X11  IR1 ðtank1Þ
dt
þ X14  IR1 ðtank2Þ  X12  IRload þ X15  IRp2

dIRload
¼ X16  IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  X16 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  X17  X16  IL1  X17  IL2
dt
 X16  IRs1  X17  IRs2  X17  IRload

dIRp1 dIL1 dIRp2 dIL2 dIRs1


At fixed points: dY1
dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0

dIRs2 dIR
¼ 0; load ¼ 0
dt dt
IRp ¼ IRs ; Y1 ¼ 0;IRp ¼ IRs ; IRload ¼ 0
1 1 2 2
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 761

1
½1    X1  IRs  X1  C2  IL1  X1  C3  IL2  X1  C2  IRs  X1  C3  IRs
ð2 þ CCcs Þ 1 2

þ X1  C2  IR1 ðtank1Þ þ X1  C3  IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ 0

X3  IRs  X4  IL1  X5  IL2 þ ½X8  X6   IRs  X5  IRs þ X7  IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
1 2
 X5 ¼ 0

X10  IRs  X11  IL1  X12  IL2  X11  IRs þ ½X15  X13   IRs þ X11
1 2
 IR1 ðtank1Þ þ X14  IR1 ðtank2Þ
¼0

X16  IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  X16 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  X17  X16  IL1  X17  IL2  X16  IRs  X17
1
 IRs
2
¼0

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) circuit consists in adding to its
coordinated [Y1 IRp1 IL1 IRs1 IRp2 IRs2 IL2 IRload IRs IR1 ðtank1Þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ] arbitrarily small
increments of exponential terms ½y1 iRp1 iL1 iRs1 iRp2 iRs2 iL2 iRload iRs iR1 ðtank1Þ
iR1 ðtank2Þ   ekt , and retaining the first order terms in y1 iRp1 iL1 iRs1 iRp2 iRs2 iL2 iRload
iRs iR1 ðtank1Þ iR1 ðtank2Þ . The system of eight homogeneous equations leads to a
polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalue k. The polynomial charac-
teristic equation accepts by set the tunable BPF (varactor diodes) circuit equations.
The tunable BPF (varactor diodes) circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small incre-
ments of exponential form ½y1 iRp1 iL1 iRs1 iRp2 iRs2 iL2 iRload iRs iR1 ðtank1Þ iR1 ðtank2Þ   ekt
are; i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; IRp1 ðtÞ ¼ IRp þ iRp1  ekt ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL þ iL1  ekt ; IRs1 ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs1  ekt
1 1 1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
IRp2 ðtÞ ¼ IRp þ iRp2  ekt ; IRs2 ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs2  ekt ; IL2 ðtÞ ¼ IL þ iL2  ekt ; IRload ðtÞ ¼ IRload þ iRload  ekt
2 2 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
IRs ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs  ekt ; IR1 ðtank1Þ ðtÞ ¼ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ iR1 ðtank1Þ  ekt ; IR1 ðtank2Þ ðtÞ ¼ IR1 ðtank2Þ þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  ekt

dY1 ðtÞ dIRp1 ðtÞ dIL ðtÞ dIRs1 ðtÞ


¼ y1  k  ekt ; ¼ iRp1  k  ekt ; 1 ¼ iL1  k  ekt ;
dt dt dt dt
¼ iRs1  k  ekt

dIRp2 ðtÞ dIRs2 ðtÞ dIL ðtÞ dIR ðtÞ


¼ iRp2  k  ekt ; ¼ iRs2  k  ekt ; 2 ¼ iL2  k  ekt ; load
dt dt dt dt
¼ iRload  k  ekt
762 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

For k < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 unstable.
Our BPF (varactor diodes) circuit tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for
k < 0, t > 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the
eigenvalue parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or unstable,
additionally his absolute value |k| establish the speed of flow toward or away from
the selected fixed point [2–4].

dY1
¼ X1  IRs  X1  C2  IL1  X1  C3  IL2  X1  C2  IRs1  X1  C3  IRs2
dt
1
þ X1  IR1 ðtank1Þ  C2 þ X1  IR1 ðtank2Þ  C3  X1  C3  IRload  X1   IRs
ð2 þ CCcs Þ

ðiÞ ðiÞ
y1  k  ekt ¼ X1  ðIRs þ iRs  ekt Þ  X1  C2  ðIL þ iL1  ekt Þ  X1  C3
1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 ðIL þ iL2  ekt Þ  X1  C2  ðIRs þ iRs1  ekt Þ  X1  C3  ðIRs þ iRs2  ekt Þ
2 1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ X1  C2  ðIR1 ðtank1Þ þ iR1 ðtank1Þ  ekt Þ þ X1  C3  ðIR1 ðtank2Þ þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  ekt Þ
ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
 X1  C3  ðIRload þ iRload  ekt Þ  X1   ðIRs þ iRs  ekt Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


y1  k  ekt ¼ X1  IRs  X1  C2  IL  X1  C3  IL  X1  C2  IRs  X1  C3  IRs
1 2 1 2

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ 1


þ X1  C 2  IR1 ðtank1Þ þ X1  C 3  IR1 ðtank2Þ  X1  C3  IRload  X1 
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
ðiÞ
 IRs þ X1  iRs  ekt  X1  C2  iL1  ekt  X1  C3  iL2  ekt  X1  C2  iRs1
 ekt  X1  C3  iRs2  ekt þ X1  C2  iR1 ðtank1Þ  ekt þ X1  C3  iR1 ðtank2Þ  ekt
1
 X1  C3  iRload  ekt  X1   iRs  ekt
ð2 þ CCcs Þ

At fixed points:

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


X1  IRs  X1  C2  IL  X1  C3  IL  X1  C2  IRs  X1  C3  IRs
1 2 1 2

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ


þ X1  C2  IR1 ðtank1Þ þ X1  C3  IR1 ðtank2Þ  X1  C3  IRload  X1   IR ¼ 0
ð2 þ CCcs Þ s

 y1  k  X1  C2  iL1  X1  C3  iL2  X1  C2  iRs1  X1  C3  iRs2


1
þ X1  C2  iR1 ðtank1Þ þ X1  C3  iR1 ðtank2Þ  X1  C3  iRload þ X1  iRs  ½1  ¼0
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 763

dIRp1
¼ X2  IRs1  X2  IRp1 ; iRp1  k  ekt
dt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X2  ðIRs þ iRs1  ekt Þ  X2  ðIRp þ iRp1  ekt Þ
1 1

ðiÞ ðiÞ
iRp1  k  ekt ¼ X2  IRs  X2  IRp þ X2  iRs1  ekt  X2  iRp1  ekt
1 1

ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed points: X2  IRs  X2  IRp ¼ 0 then iRp1  k þ X2  iRs1  X2  iRp1 ¼ 0
1 1

dIL1 ðiÞ ðiÞ


¼ Y1 ; iL1  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y1 ¼ 0 ) iL1  k þ y1 ¼ 0
dt
dIRp2
¼ X9  IRs2  X9  IRp2 ; iRp2  k  ekt
dt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X9  ðIRs þ iRs2  ekt Þ  X9  ðIRp þ iRp2  ekt Þ
2 2

ðiÞ ðiÞ
iRp2  k  ekt ¼ X9  IRs  X9  IRp þ X9  iRs2  ekt  X9  iRp2  ekt
2 2

ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed points: X9  IRs  X9  IRp ¼ 0 then iRp2  k þ X9  iRs2  X9  iRp2 ¼ 0
2 2

dIL2 Rload ðiÞ Rload


¼ IRload  ; iL2  k  ekt ¼ ðIRload þ iRload  ekt Þ  ; iL2  k  ekt
dt L2 L2
ðiÞ Rload Rload kt
¼ IRload  þ iRload  e
L2 L2
ðiÞ
At fixed points: IRload  RLload
2
¼ 0 then iL2  k þ iRload  RLload
2
¼0

dIRs1
¼ X3  IRs  X4  IL1  X5  IL2  X6  IRs1  X5  IRs2 þ X7
dt
 IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  X5  X5  IRload þ X8  IRp1

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


iRs1  k  ekt ¼ X3  ðIRs þ iRs  ekt Þ  X4  ðIL þ iL1  ekt Þ  X5  ðIL þ iL2  ekt Þ
1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 X6  ðIRs þ iRs1  ekt Þ  X5  ðIRs þ iRs2  ekt Þ þ X7
1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 ðIR1 ðtank1Þ þ iR1 ðtank1Þ  ekt Þ þ ðIR1 ðtank2Þ þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  ekt Þ  X5
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 X5  ðIRload þ iRload  ekt Þ þ X8  ðIRp þ iRp1  ekt Þ
1
764 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


iRs1  k  ekt ¼ X3  IRs  X4  IL  X5  IL  X6  IRs  X5  IRs þ X7  IR1 ðtank1Þ
1 2 1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  X5  X5  IRload þ X8  IRp þ X3  iRs  ekt  X4  iL1  ekt
1

 X5  iL2  ekt  X6  iRs1  ekt  X5  iRs2  ekt þ X7  iR1 ðtank1Þ


 ekt þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  ekt  X5  X5  iRload  ekt þ X8  iRp1  ekt

At fixed points:

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


X3  IRs  X4  IL  X5  IL  X6  IRs  X5  IRs þ X7  IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
1 2 1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 X5  X5  IRload þ X8  IRp ¼ 0
1

iRs1  k þ X3  iRs  X4  iL1  X5  iL2  X6  iRs1  X5  iRs2 þ X7


 iR1 ðtank1Þ þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  X5  X5  iRload þ X8  iRp1
¼0

dIRs2
¼ X10  IRs  X11  IL1  X12  IL2  X11  IRs1  X13  IRs2 þ X11  IR1 ðtank1Þ
dt
þ X14  IR1 ðtank2Þ  X12  IRload þ X15  IRp2

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


iRs2  k  ekt ¼ X10  ðIRs þ iRs  ekt Þ  X11  ðIL þ iL1  ekt Þ  X12  ðIL þ iL2  ekt Þ
1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 X11  ðIRs þ iRs1  ekt Þ  X13  ðIRs þ iRs2  ekt Þ þ X11  ðIR1 ðtank1Þ
1 2
ðiÞ
þ iR1 ðtank1Þ  ekt Þ þ X14  ðIR1 ðtank2Þ þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  ekt Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 X12  ðIRload þ iRload  ekt Þ þ X15  ðIRp þ iRp2  ekt Þ
2

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


iRs2  k  ekt ¼ X10  IRs  X11  IL  X12  IL  X11  IRs  X13  IRs þ X11
1 2 1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 IR1 ðtank1Þ þ X14  IR1 ðtank2Þ  X12  IRload þ X15  I Rp þ X10  iRs  ekt
2

 X11  iL1  ekt  X12  iL2  ekt  X11  iRs1  ekt  X13  iRs2  ekt
þ X11  iR1 ðtank1Þ  ekt þ X14  iR1 ðtank2Þ  ekt  X12  iRload  ekt þ X15  iRp2  ekt

At fixed points:
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X10  IRs  X11  IL  X12  IL  X11  IRs  X13  IRs þ X11  IR1 ðtank1Þ þ X14  IR1 ðtank2Þ
1 2 1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 X12  IRload þ X15  IRp ¼ 0
2
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 765

 iRs2  k þ X10  iRs  X11  iL1  X12  iL2  X11  iRs1  X13  iRs2 þ X11  iR1 ðtank1Þ
þ X14  iR1 ðtank2Þ  X12  iRload þ X15  iRp2 ¼ 0

dIRload
¼ X16  IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  X16 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  X17  X16  IL1  X17  IL2
dt
 X16  IRs1  X17  IRs2  X17  IRload

ðiÞ ðiÞ
iRload  k  ekt ¼ X16  ðIRs þ iRs  ekt Þ þ ðIR1 ðtank1Þ þ iR1 ðtank1Þ  ekt Þ  X16
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ ðIR1 ðtank2Þ þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  ekt Þ  X17  X16  ðIL þ iL1  ekt Þ
1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 X17  ðIL þ iL2  ekt Þ  X16  ðIRs þ iRs1  ekt Þ  X17  ðIRs þ iRs2
2 1 2
ðiÞ
 ekt Þ  X17  ðIRload þ iRload  ekt Þ

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


iRload  k  ekt ¼ X16  IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  X16 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  X17  X16  IL  X17  IL
1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
 X16  IRs  X17  IR s  X17  IRload þ X16  iRs  e þ iR1 ðtank1Þ  ekt
kt
1 2

 X16 þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  ekt  X17  X16  iL1  ekt  X17  iL2  ekt  X16  iRs1
 ekt  X17  iRs2  ekt  X17  iRload  ekt

At fixed points:

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


X16  IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ  X16 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ  X17  X16  IL  X17  IL  X16  IRs
1 2 1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
 X17  IRs  X17  IRload ¼ 0
2

iRload  k þ X16  iRs þ iR1 ðtank1Þ  X16 þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  X17  X16  iL1  X17  iL2  X16
 iRs1  X17  iRs2  X17  iRload
¼0
We can summery our BPF (varactor diodes) circuit arbitrarily small increments
equations:

 y1  k  X1  C2  iL1  X1  C3  iL2  X1  C2  iRs1  X1  C3  iRs2


þ X1  C2  iR1 ðtank1Þ þ X1  C3  iR1 ðtank2Þ  X1  C3  iRload þ X1  iRs  X1
1
  iRs ¼ 0
ð2 þ CCcs Þ

iRp1  k  X2  iRp1 þ X2  iRs1 ¼ 0; iL1  k þ y1 ¼ 0


766 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

 iRs1  k  X6  iRs1 þ X3  iRs  X4  iL1  X5  iL2  X5  iRs2 þ X7


 iR1 ðtank1Þ þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  X5  X5  iRload þ X8  iRp1 ¼ 0

iRp2  k  X9  iRp2 þ X9  iRs2 ¼ 0

 iRs2  k  X13  iRs2 þ X10  iRs  X11  iL1  X12  iL2  X11  iRs1 þ X11  iR1 ðtank1Þ þ X14  iR1 ðtank2Þ
 X12  iRload þ X15  iRp2 ¼ 0

Rload
iL2  k þ iRload  ¼0
L2

iRload  k  X17  iRload þ X16  iRs þ iR1 ðtank1Þ  X16 þ iR1 ðtank2Þ  X17  X16  iL1  X17
 iL2  X16  iRs1  X17  iRs2
¼0

0 1
y1
B C
B iRp1 C
B C
B iL1 C
0 1 B C 0 1 0 1
N11 ... N18 B C i11 ... i13 iRs
B iRs1 C
B .. .. .. C B C B .. .. .. C B i C
@ . . . A  B Cþ@ . . . A  @ R1 ðtank1Þ A ¼ 0; N11
B iRp2 C
N81  N88 B C i81  i83 iR1 ðtank2Þ
B C
B iRs2 C
B C
B iL2 C
@ A
iRload
¼ k; N12 ¼ 0; N13 ¼ X1  C2

N14 ¼ X1  C2 ; N15 ¼ 0; N16 ¼ X1  C3 ; N17 ¼ X1  C3 ; N18 ¼ X1  C3 ; N21 ¼ 0

N22 ¼ k  X2 ; N23 ¼ 0; N24 ¼ X2 ; N25 ¼ N26 ¼ N27 ¼ N28 ¼ 0; N31 ¼ 1; N32 ¼ 0

N33 ¼ k; N34 ¼ . . .N38 ¼ 0; N41 ¼ 0; N42 ¼ X8 ; N43 ¼ X4 ; N44 ¼ k  X6

N45 ¼ 0; N46 ¼ X5 ; N47 ¼ X5 ; N48 ¼ X5 ; N51 ¼ N52 ¼ N53 ¼ N54 ¼ 0; N55
¼ k  X9

N56 ¼ X9 ; N57 ¼ N58 ¼ 0; N61 ¼ 0; N62 ¼ 0; N63 ¼ X11 ; N64 ¼ X11 ; N65 ¼ X15

N66 ¼ k  X13 ; N67 ¼ X12 ; N68 ¼ X12 ; N71 ¼ . . . ¼ N76 ¼ 0; N77 ¼ k; N78
Rload
¼
L2
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 767

N81 ¼ N82 ¼ 0; N83 ¼ X16 ; N84 ¼ X16 ; N85 ¼ 0; N86 ¼ X17 ; N87 ¼ X17 ; N88
¼ k  X17

1
i11 ¼ X1  ½1  ; i12 ¼ X1  C2 ; i13 ¼ X1  C3 ; i21 ¼ i22 ¼ i23 ¼ 0; i31
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
¼ i32 ¼ i33 ¼0

i41 ¼ X3 ; i42 ¼ X7 ; i43 ¼ X5 ; i51 ¼ i52 ¼ i53 ¼ 0; i61 ¼ X10 ; i62 ¼ X11 ; i63 ¼ X14

i71 ¼ i72 ¼ i73 ¼ 0; i81 ¼ X16 ; i82 ¼ X16 ; i83 ¼ X17

0 1 0 1
i11 ... i13 iRs
B .. .. .. C B i C
Assumption @ . . . A  @ R1 ðtank1Þ A ! e
i81  i83 iR1 ðtank2Þ
0 1 0 1
N11 . . . N18 N11 . . . N18
B . .. .. C B .. .. .. C
ðA  k  IÞ ¼ @ .. . . A; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ det@ . . . A¼0
N81    N88 N81    N88

X
8 X
8
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ !k  kk ; !k  kk ¼ 0:
k¼0 k¼0

Remark It is reader exercise to find the expressions for !k 8 k ¼ 0; 1; . . .; 8:


Eigenvalues stability discussion: Our BPF (varactor diodes) circuit involving N
variables (N > 2, N = 11, arbitrarily small increments), the characteristic equation
is of degree N = 8 (reduced) and must often be solved numerically. Expect in some
particular cases, such an equation has (N = 8) distinct roots that can be real or
complex. These values are the eigenvalues of the (10  10) Jacobian matrix (A).
The general rule is that the BPF (varactor diodes) circuit is stable if there is no
eigenvalue with positive real part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is positive for
the steady state to be unstable. Our 8-variables (y1 iRp1 iL1 iRs1 iRp2 iRs2 iL2 iRload )
system has eight eigenvalues (eight system’s arbitrarily small increments). The type
of behavior can be characterized as a function of the position of these eigenvalues in
the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be distinguished: (1) the eight
eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), (2) the eight eigenvalues are
real, at least one of them is positive (unstable steady state), (3) and (4) two
eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and other eigenvalues
real are negative (stable steady state), two cases can be distinguished depending on
the relative value of the real part of the complex eigenvalues and of the real one,
(5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and at least
one of the other eigenvalues real is positive (unstable steady state) [12, 13].
768 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

X
8 X
8
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ !k  kk ; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) ! k  kk ¼ 0
k¼0 k¼0

Exercises

1. We have triplexer circuit. It is a four ports device with a common input and three
outputs. A triplexer is a passive device that implements frequency domain
multiplexing. Three ports (e.g., L, I, H) are multiplexed onto a fourth port (e.g.,
S). The signals on L, I, and H occupy disjoint frequency bands. Consequently,
the signals on L, I, and H can coexist on port S without interfering with each
other. The signal on port L (low band) will occupy a single low frequency band,
the signal on port I (intermediate band) will occupy a single intermediate fre-
quency band and the signal on port H will occupy a higher frequency band. In
that situation, the triplexer consists of a low pass filter connecting ports L and S,
and an intermediate pass filter connecting ports I and S, and a high pass filter
connecting ports H and S. The triplexer, being a passive device, is reciprocal;
the device itself doesn’t have a nothing of input or output. The ports of a
diplexer are frequency selective. A triplexer multiplexes three ports onto one
port. A triplexer can be placed at the output of a frequency RF source, where it
functions as an absorptive filter.
Exercises 769

Filter 2 (I) of the triplexer has a BPF that corresponds with the undesired
frequency band, which can pass right through with little attenuation, and is ter-
minated within to 50 X load. These undesired frequencies are blocked from
entering filter 2 (I) by that filter’s stop band. Filters 1(L) and 3(H) BPFs passes all
the desired signals onto load 1 or load 2 through matching networks (1 and 2) with
little attenuation. The undesired signals through the triplexer are absorbed instead of
being reflected as they would be in a typical filter. The design of a triplexer is as
three different frequency filters with non-overlapping bandpass. The matching
network between triplexer circuit unit and loads (Rload1 and Rload2) can be L-type,
Pi-type, and T-type.

Consider in our RF system which diplexer is an integrated unit, micro strip lines
between filter 1(L) and filter 3(H) to the matching networks. The parasitic effects of
micro strip line between filter 2(I) and 50 X resistor are neglected. We represent
these micro strip lines parasitic effects as a delay lines in time. The delays are
related to the current which flows through micro strips lines and are define as
sout1 ðTau-out1 Þ and sout2 ðTau-out2 Þ respectively. We neglect the triplexer input
micro strip line parasitic effects. s [ 0; s 2 R
1:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points (matching network 1:
T type and matching network 2: L type). Assumption: dVdts ðtÞ ! e.
1:2 Discuss stability of our circuit for the following cases: (a) sout1 ¼ s; sout2 ¼ 0(b)
sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ s(c) sout1 ¼ C  sout2 ; sout2 ¼ s; C 2 R þ How our circuit
behavior changes for different values of C and s Parameters?
770 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

1:3 How our circuit dynamic is changed if we disconnect inductor L2? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability and sta-
bility switching.
1:4 We choose both circuits’ matching networks Pi type. Assumption: dVdts ðtÞ ! e .
Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability and
stability switching.
1:5 We add additional filter to our triplexer (inductor L4 and capacitor C4 in series)
which terminated by 50 X resistor. Our circuit is Quad-plexer. Write circuit
differential equations and find fixed points (matching networks are L type).
Discuss stability and stability switching.

2. We have a system of two diplexers in series. Diplexer (I): Two band pass filters
are duplexed, one common input, and two outputs. A diplexer (I) is referring to
a duplex high pass and low pass where broad bands transmit and receive is
necessary. It is a three ports device with common input and two outputs. It
implements frequency domain multiplexing two ports (e.g., LI and HI) are
multiplexed onto a third port (e.g., SI). The signal on port LI and HI occupy
disjoint frequency bands. Consequently, the signals on LI and HI can coexist on
port SI without interfering with each other. The signal on port LI will occupy a
single low frequency band and the signal on port HI will occupy a higher
frequency band. Diplexer (II): Two band pass filters are duplexed, one common
input, and two outputs. A diplexer (II) is referring to a duplex high pass and low
pass where broad bands transmit and receive is necessary. It is a three ports
device with common input and two outputs. It implements frequency domain
multiplexing two ports (e.g., LII and HII) are multiplexed onto a third port (e.g.,
SII). The signal on port LII and HII occupy disjoint frequency bands.
Consequently, the signals on LII and HII can coexist on port SII without inter-
fering with each other. The signal on port LII will occupy a single low frequency
band and the signal on port HII will occupy a higher frequency band. There is an
overlap between diplexer (I) port HI frequency band and diplexer (II) port HII
frequency band.

Diplexer (I)

LI HI

f(Hz)

Diplexer (II)

LII HII

f(Hz)
Exercises 771

Filter (II) of diplexer (I)—low band and filter (IV) of diplexer (II)—low band
have a BPFs that correspond with the undesired frequency bands, and are termi-
nated within the 50 X load. These undesired frequencies are blocked from entering
filters II and IV by that filter’s stop band. Diplexers (I) and (II) are connected in
series by micro strip lines and matching networks (I). The output load (Rload) is
connected to diplexer II’s output through matching network (II).

We represent these micro strips parasitic effects as a delay lines in time. The
delays are related to the current which flows through micro strips and are
sin ðTau-inÞ and sout ðTau-outÞ respectively. We choose T type matching network
(I) and L type matching network (II). We neglect in our analysis other circuit micro
strips parasitic effects and consider them as an ideal elements. s [ 0; s 2 R.
772 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

2:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.

dVs ðtÞ
Assumption dt ! e.
2:2 Discuss stability of our circuit for the following cases: (a) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ 0,
pffiffiffi
(b) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ s2 , (c) sin ¼ s2 ; sout ¼ s  s. How our circuit behavior
changes for different values of s parameter? Discuss stability switching for
different values of s parameter.
2:3 We disconnect diplexer (I)’s filter (II). How it influences our circuit behavior?
Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability and
stability switching for the following cases: (a) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ 0,
(b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s.
2:4 We disconnect diplexer (II)’s filter (IV). How it influences our circuit
behavior? Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss
pffiffiffi
stability and stability switching for the following cases: (a) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ 0,
p ffiffi

(b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s  3 s.
2:5 We disconnect inductor L3. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability and sta-
pffiffiffi
bility switching for the following cases: (a) sin ¼ s  s; sout ¼ 0,
pffiffiffi p ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffi
(b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s  3 s.

3. We have a system of two diplexers (I and II), two RF/Microwave sources, and
summation operator. The summation operator is implemented by using ideal op
amps (summing amplifier follows by inverting amplifier).
R
R1 ¼ R2 ¼ Rf1 ; Rfin2 ¼ 1; VC ¼ VA þ VB ; R2  Rs2 ; R2 þ Rs2  R2
Diplexer (I): Two band pass filters are duplexed, one common input, and two
outputs. A diplexer (I) is referring to a duplex high pass and low pass where broad
bands transmit and receive is necessary. It is a three ports device with common
input and two outputs. It implements frequency domain multiplexing two ports
(e.g., LI and HI) are multiplexed onto a third port (e.g., SI). The signal on port LI
and HI occupy disjoint frequency bands. Consequently, the signals on LI and HI
can coexist on port SI without interfering with each other. The signal on port LI will
occupy a single low frequency band and the signal on port HI will occupy a higher
frequency band. Diplexer (II): Two band pass filters are duplexed, one common
input, and two outputs. A diplexer (II) is referring to a duplex high pass and low
pass where broad bands transmit and receive is necessary. It is a three ports device
with common input and two outputs. It implements frequency domain multiplexing
two ports (e.g., LII and HII) are multiplexed onto a third port (e.g., SII). The signal
on port LII and HII occupy disjoint frequency bands. Consequently, the signals on
LII and HII can coexist on port SII without interfering with each other. The signal
on port LII will occupy a single low frequency band and the signal on port HII will
occupy a higher frequency band. There is an overlap between diplexer (I) port HI
frequency band and diplexer (II) port HII frequency band. The output of diplexer
Exercises 773

(I)’s filter (I) is connected to summation operator (port A). RF/Microwave source
Vs2(t) is connected through resistor Rs2 to summation operator (port B). Load
resistor Rload is connected to diplexer (II)’s filter (IV) through T type matching
network.
Filter (II) of diplexer (I)—low band and filter (III) of diplexer (II)—high band
have a BPFs that correspond with the undesired frequency bands, and are termi-
nated within the 50 X load. These undesired frequencies are blocked from entering
filters II and III by that filter’s stop band. Diplexers (I) and (II) are connected to
summation operator by micro strip lines (sin ðTau-inÞ; sout ðTau-outÞ) .Matching
networks (I) is connected to diplexer (II)’s filter (IV) by micro strip line
(sm ðTau-mÞ).
Assumption There is an overlaps between all circuit’s filters frequency bands, the
output signal from diplexer (II)’s filter (IV) is within specific frequency band and
target for our load resistance (Rload).
dV ðtÞ dV ðtÞ
Assumption dt s1
! e; dt s2
! e. All other micro strip lines in our system are
ideal with no parasitic effects in our circuit. s [ 0; s 2 R

3:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.


3:2 Discuss stability of our circuit for the following cases: sm ¼ s
pffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi pffiffiffi
(a) sin ¼ s2 ; sout ¼ 0, (b) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ 3 s2 , (c) sin ¼ s2 ; sout ¼ 3 s  s.
774 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

How our circuit behavior changes for different values of s parameter? Discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameter.
3:3 We disconnect diplexer (I)’s filter (II). How it influences our circuit behavior?
Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability and
stability switching for the following cases: sm ¼ s (a) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ 0,
(b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s.
3:4 We disconnect diplexer (II)’s filter (III). How it influences our circuit
behavior? Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss
pffiffiffi
stability and stability switching for the following cases: sm ¼ s
pffiffiffi pffiffiffi pffiffiffi
(a) sin ¼ s  s; sout ¼ 0, (b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ 4s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s  3 s.
3:5 We disconnect diplexer (I) from summation operator. How it influences our
circuit dynamics? Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
pffiffiffi
Discuss stability and stability switching for the following cases: sm ¼ s  s
pffiffiffi pffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
p ffiffiffi
(a) sin ¼ s  s; sout ¼ 0, (b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s  3 s.

4. We have a system of triple band triplexer filter. The circuit of triple band
triplexer contains capacitors and inductors, RF source Vs(t) and series resistor
Rs, and resistive loads Rload1, Rload2 and Rload3. Three delays lines sout1 ; sout2 and
sout3 represent circuit micro strip lines parasitic effects. In our analysis we
consider full matching between Rload1 and BPF1, Rload2 and BPF2, Rload3 and
BPF3 (no matching networks). We consider all other micro strip lines in our
circuit are an ideal micro strips lines.

Load resistors Rload1 and Rload2 are connected to BPF1 and BPF2 through
inductors bridge (LA ; LB ; LC ; LD ; LA 6¼ LB 6¼ LC 6¼ LD ).
Exercises 775

4:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points,

dVs ðtÞ
Assumption dt ! e.
4:2 Discuss stability of our circuit for the following cases:
pffiffiffi
(a) sout1 ¼ s; sout2 ¼ s; sout3 ¼ 0
pffiffiffi
(b) sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ s2 ; sout3 ¼ s  s
p ffiffi

(c) sout1 ¼ s2 ; sout2 ¼ s; sout3 ¼ s:
How our circuit behavior changes for different values of s parameter? Discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameter.
4:3 We disconnect capacitor C2. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability of our
circuit for the following cases:
P
2
(a) sout1 ¼ s  C1 ; sout2 ¼ s2out1 ; sout3 ¼ soutk
k¼1
pffiffiffi P2
(b) sout1 ¼ s2  C2 ; sout2 ¼ s; sout3 ¼ s2outk
k¼1

C1 ; C2 2 R þ ; C1 6¼ C2 ; s [ 0; s 2 R. Discuss stability switching for different


values of C1 ; C2 ; s parameters.
4:4 Return (4.3) if we disconnect inductors L2 and L4.
4:5 We disconnect Inductors Bridge’s LB, how it influences our circuit dynamics?
Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability of
our circuit for the following cases:
pffiffiffi P
2
(a) sout1 ¼ s  C1 ; sout2 ¼ s2out1 ; sout3 ¼ Ck  soutk
k¼1
pffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi P
2
(b) sout1 ¼ 3 s2  C2 ; sout2 ¼ s  s; sout3 ¼ Ck  s2outk
k¼1

C1 ; C2 2 R þ ; C1 6¼ C2 ; s [ 0; s 2 R. Discuss stability switching for different


values of C1 ; C2 ; s parameters.
5. We have a system of triple band triplexer filter. The circuit of triple band
triplexer contains capacitors and inductors, RF source Vs(t) and series resistor
Rs, and resistive loads Rload1, Rload2. Three delays lines sout1 ; sout2 and sout3
represent circuit micro strip lines parasitic effects. In our analysis we consider
full matching between Rload1 and BPF1, Rload2 and BPF2 (no matching net-
works). We consider all other micro strip lines in our circuit are an ideal micro
strips lines. RF signals from BPF2 and BPF3 are added by using summation
operator and feed to capacitors and inductors bridge. Load resistors Rload1 and
Rload2 are connected to BPF1, BPF2, and BPF3 through inductors and
capacitors bridge (LA ; LB ; CA ; CB ; LA 6¼ LB ; CA 6¼ CB ). The summation oper-
ator is implemented by using ideal op amps (summing amplifier follows by
776 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

R
inverting amplifier). R1 ¼ R2 ¼ Rf1 ; Rfin2 ¼ 1; VC ¼ VA þ VB ; R2 
Rs2 ; R2 þ Rs2  R2 (see question 3).

5:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points, Assumption:
dVs ðtÞ
dt ! e.
5:2 Discuss stability of our circuit for the following cases:
pffiffiffi pffiffiffi
(a) sout1 ¼ 3 s; sout2 ¼ s; sout3 ¼ 0
p ffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi
(b) sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ s2 ; sout3 ¼ s2  s
3

p ffiffiffiffi
ffi pffiffiffi
(c) sout1 ¼ s2 ; sout2 ¼ s; sout3 ¼ s  s:
3

How our circuit behavior changes for different values of s parameter? Discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameter.
5:3 We disconnect capacitor C5. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability of our
circuit for the following cases:
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi P
2
(a) sout1 ¼ s  C1 ; sout2 ¼ 3 s2out1 ; sout3 ¼ C21  soutk
k¼1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi P
2
(b) sout1 ¼ 3 s2  C2 ; sout2 ¼ s  s; sout3 ¼ s2outk
k¼1

C1 ; C2 2 R þ ; C1 6¼ C2 ; s [ 0; s 2 R. Discuss stability switching for different


values of C1 ; C2 ; s parameters.
5:4 Return (5.3) if we disconnect inductors L2 and L9.
Exercises 777

5:5 We disconnect Inductors Bridge’s CB, how it influences our circuit dynamics?
Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability of
our circuit for the following cases:
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffi P
2
(a) sout1 ¼ s  C1 ; sout2 ¼ s2out1 ; sout3 ¼ Ck  soutk
k¼1
p ffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffi P
2
(b) sout1 ¼ s2  C2 ; sout2 ¼ s  s; sout3 ¼ Ck  s2outk
3

k¼1

C1 ; C2 2 R þ ; C1 6¼ C2 ; s [ 0; s 2 R. Discuss stability switching for different


values of C1 ; C2 ; s parameters.

6. We have crystal-lattice BPF circuit with two output loads resistances Rload1 and
Rload2. Crystals have series and parallel resonant mode. The crystal lattice filter
contains several crystals within a single circuit. The input employs RF trans-
former (T1) with shunt capacitor (C1). The output employs five terminals
transformer (T2) with shunt capacitor (C2). Each set of crystals XTAL1 plus
XTAL2 and XTAL3 plus XTAL4 are cut to different frequencies. The matched
set of XTAL1 and XTAL2 having a lower resonant frequency than the other
matched set of XTAL3 and XTAL4. Transformer T1: Parameters np1 and ns1 are
the number of turns of coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary), respectively.
Transformer T2: Parameter np2 is the number of turns of coil 1 (primary).
Parameters ns2a and ns2b are the number of turns of coil 2 (secondary). In your
analysis use the equivalent circuit of a quartz crystal and use typical crystal
parameters.

6:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Find arbitrarily small
increments equations.
6:2 Find circuit eigenvalues and discuss stability.
778 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

6:3 Capacitor C2 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write


circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
6:4 Load resistance Rload2 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamic?
Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
6:5 We multiple the value of capacitor C1 by C parameter (C1 ! C1  C),
C [ 0; C 2 R þ . How it influences our circuit dynamics. Discuss stability and
stability switching for different values of C parameter.

7. We have Half-lattice crystal filter circuit with two crystals and one load Rload.
Crystals have a series and parallel resonant mode. The Half lattice crystal filter
contains two crystals within a single circuit. The input employs RF transformer
(T1) with shunt capacitor (C1). The set of crystals XTAL1 and XTAL2 are cut to
different frequencies. Half-lattice crystal filter offers a flatter in band response.
The two crystals have different resonant frequencies. The response has a small
peak at either side of the center frequency and a small dip in the middle.
Transformer T1: np is the number of turns of coil 1 (primary). Nsa and nsb are
number of turns of coil 2 (secondary) and coil 3 (secondary). In our analysis, we
use the equivalent circuit of a quartz crystal and use typical crystal parameters.

7:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Find arbitrarily small
increments equations.
7:2 Find circuit eigenvalues and discuss stability.
7:3 Capacitor C1 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
7:4 We increase the number of coil 3 turns by C factor (nsb ! nsb  C),
C [ 0; C 2 R þ . How it influences our circuit dynamics? Discuss stability
switching for different values of C parameter.
7:5 We short crystal XTAL2. How it influences circuit behavior? Write circuit
differential equation and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
Exercises 779

8. We have Half-lattice crystal filter circuit with two crystals and one load Rload.
Crystals have a series and parallel resonant mode. The Half lattice crystal filter
contains two crystals within a single circuit. The input employs RF trans-
former (T1) with shunt capacitor (C1). The RF transformer (T1)’s secondary is
connected to two capacitors (Ca and Cb). The set of crystals XTAL1 and
XTAL2 are cut to different frequencies. Half-lattice crystal filter offers a flatter
in band response. The two crystals have different resonant frequencies. The
response has a small peak at either side of the center frequency and a small dip
in the middle. Transformer T1: np is the number of turns of coil 1 (primary). ns
is number of turns of coil 2 (secondary). In our analysis, we use the equivalent
circuit of a quartz crystal and use typical crystal parameters.

8:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Find arbitrarily small
increments Eqs.
8:2 Find circuit eigenvalues and discuss stability.
8:3 Capacitor Cb is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
8:4 We increase the number of coil 1 turns by C factor (np ! np  C),
C [ 0; C 2 R þ . How it influences our circuit dynamics? Discuss stability
switching for different values of C parameter.
8:5 We short crystal XTAL1. How it influences circuit behavior? Write circuit
differential equation and find fixed points. Discuss stability.

9. We have circuit of a single crystal filter. It employs the very high Q of the
crystal. Its response is asymmetric and it is too narrow for most applications,
having a bandwidth of a hundred Hz or less. In the circuit there is a variable
capacitor (Cx) that is used to compensate for the parasitic capacitance in the
780 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis

crystal. This capacitor was normally included as a front panel control. The input
employs RF transformer (T1) with shunt capacitor (C1). The RF transformer
(T1)’s secondary is connected to two capacitors (Ca and Cb). Transformer T1: np
is the number of turns of coil 1 (primary). ns is number of turns of coil 2
(secondary). In our analysis, we use the equivalent circuit of a quartz crystal and
use typical crystal parameters. The crystals XTAL1 is cut to different frequency.

9:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Find arbitrarily small
increments equations
9:2 Find circuit eigenvalues and discuss stability.
9:3 Capacitor Ca is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
9:4 We increase the number of coil 1 turns by C factor (np ! np  C),
C [ 0; C 2 R þ . How it influences our circuit dynamics? Discuss stability
switching for different values of C parameter.
9:5 We increase the Cx capacitor value by w parameter (Cx ! Cx  w),
w [ 0; w 2 R þ . Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of w parameter.

10. We have circuit of top inductively coupled variable BPF. For wideband
applications the top inductively coupled variable band pass filter is the best. The
circuit includes varactor diodes (Cv) and inductors L1, …, L5, bias resistors R1
and R2 isolated the two varactors (Cv) from the effects of each other, and
resistor R3 represents a direct RF short to ground through Vtune. Capacitors C2
and C3 block the DC inserted by Vtune from being shorted by L2 and L4.
Varactor diodes (Cv) supply the variable tuning capacitance. The capacitance of
the series combination of C2 and Cv in series is CC2 2þCCv v . The capacitance of the
series combination of C3 and Cv in series is CC3 3þCCv v . The capacitors C2 and C3
mainly functioning as a DC blocking capacitor, while Cv, the varactor is
Exercises 781

supplying all of the tuning capacitance for the filter tanks. By applying positive
Vtune we allow the varactor to either linearly tune the filter to its maximum and
minimum values or, by supplying Vtune with discrete voltages it filter the
incoming RF/Microwave signal in discrete steps. The circuit load resistance
Rload is connected in our voltage tunable inductor coupled bandpass filter. Input
RF/microwave signal voltage Vs(t) and his series resistance Rs.

Remark A varactor diode is a P-N junction diode that changes its capacitance and
the series resistance as the bias applied to the diode is varied. The property of
capacitance change is utilized to achieve a change in the frequency and/or phase of
our BPF. In your stability and circuit analysis use the simple model of a packaged
varactor diode. For normal operation, a varactor diode is always reverse biased.
Varactor diode is called voltage controlled capacitor.
10:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
10:2 Find arbitrarily small increments equations and discuss stability.
10:3 Resistor R1 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
10:4 We increase the value of L3 inductor by C parameter (L3 ! L3  C),
C [ 0; C 2 R þ . Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of C parameter.
10:5 Inductor L4 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Find
circuit differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
Chapter 8
Antennas System Stability Analysis

An antenna is a conductor or group of conductors used for radiating electromag-


netic energy into space or collecting electromagnetic energy from space. The radio
signal is generated in a transmitter and radiates through space to a receiver by
antenna. The transmitter signal energy is sent into space by a transmitting antenna
and the radio frequency energy is picked up from space by the receiving antenna.
As the electromagnetic field arrives at the receiving antenna, a voltage is induced
into the antenna and passed into the receiver. There are many types of antennas and
we discuss those antennas that operate at microwave frequencies. Microwave refer
to radio waves with wavelength ranging from as long as 1 m to as short as 1 mm
with frequencies between 300 MHz to 300 GHz. Microwave antenna is used for
radiating microwave signal into space and receiving microwave signal from space.
Microwave antenna is the transition region between free space and guiding struc-
ture. Antenna requirements include gain, receiving area, beam width, polarization,
bandwidth, and side lobes. The major function of the antenna used at the receiver
end of a RF/Microwave system is to collect as much of this transmitted power as
possible. It is important in many applications to make the receiving area or aperture
of the antenna as large as possible. Another antennas area is for RFID applications.
Complete RFID system includes RFID reader and transponder units. Electrical
current flowing through a conductor generates electromagnetic fields. We distin-
guish two fields regions related to RFID applications. The first region is far-field
region. In this region, the generated fields are radiated fields which energy prop-
agates through the space with an energy density proportional to the inverse of the
distance. The second region is the near-field region. In this region, radiated fields
are not prevalent. Instead, attenuating fields, in which the strength of the field
decreases with (1/r3) are dominant. Furthermore, the power in this region is reac-
tive. The boundaries between far-field and near-field regions depend on the rela-
tionship between the physical dimensions of the antenna and the wavelength of the

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 783


O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_8
784 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

propagating signal. In particular, the dimensions of the antenna should be com-


patible to the wavelength of the signal in order to achieve optimal performance. The
wavelength of signals operating in the LF (Low Frequency) region is 2.4 km, while
the wavelength for signals operating in the HF (High Frequency) region is 24 m.
Therefore, at these frequencies it would not be practical to build antennas with
dimensions similar to the wavelength of their signals. Any antennas that can be
built in a practical manner for RFID transponders operating in the LF or HF ranges
will be electrically small and therefore highly inefficient. RFID transponders
operating in the LF or HF frequencies cannot use dipole antennas because of the
mismatch in dimensions. The solution is to use a small loop antenna instead of a
dipole. A small loop antenna is a closed loop with a maximum dimension that is
less than about a tenth of the wavelength of the signal. The small loop antenna is the
dual equivalent of an ideal dipole and it is suitable for antennas incorporated in
transponders operating at LF or HF frequencies. A conductor of infinite length
carrying a magnitude of current of (I) amps. The magnetic field (B/) measured at a
distance of (r) meters from the conductor can be found using Ampere’s law as
l0 I Wb
B/ ¼ 2pr ð m2 Þ, where l0 is the permeability of the free space
l0 ¼ 4  p  107 m H . A conductor of infinite length is not realistic. Its practical
implementation is based on building a loop antenna by bending the original, finite
wire, which carries a current of (I) amps in a circle with a radius of (a) meters. In
practice, the wire is bent in such a way that produces a total of N turns as this allows
using a longer wire with a relatively small diameter. In this situation, the value of
the magnetic field in the (z) coordinate direction (Bz) for a point located at a
distance of (r) meters from the plane of the coil and located along the axis of the coil
can be found as Bz ¼ l02INa2 3=2 ðWb
2

2ða þ r Þ m2 Þ, where (a) is the radius of the loop in meters.


The other kind of N turns antenna is rectangular spiral antenna. Both antennas are
sensitive to their parameters variation and stability need to be investigated.
Additionally, micro strips lines in RFID system cause to system’s parasitic delays
and influence stability. Special antenna to many RF and microwave applications is
N-turn multilayer circular coil and there is an expression which define its induc-
tance as a function of overall parameters [7, 8]. The stability is inspected for
parameters variations and optimization under delayed electromagnetic interfer-
ences. Some antennas systems are straight thin film inductors antennas structure
(single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system) and its sta-
bility is inspected for many RF applications. Helix (Helical) antenna is consisting of
a conducting wire wound in the form of a helix. Helical antennas are mounted over
a ground plane. The feed line is connected between the bottom of the helix and the
ground plane. Helical antennas can operate in one of two modes, normal mode or
axial mode. In each operation mode we can represent helical antenna as equivalent
circuit and inspect stability for parameters variations.
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 785

8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas


Transceiver System Stability Optimization Under
Delayed Electromagnetic Interferences

N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas can be integrated with RFID IC for com-
plete RFID tags. We investigate the system stability optimization under delayed
electromagnetic interference and parasitic effects. An N-turn multilayer circular coil
antenna is constructed from N-turn of circular coil with multilayer. Our system is
constructed from two antenna; each one, N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna.
Antennas are connected in series with micro strip line and to the RFID IC. An
N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas system is influenced by electromagnetic
interference, which effect their stability behavior. Additionally, micro strip line
which connected each antenna in series, has a parasitic effect, a delay in time Dl.
We inspect our system performances under electromagnetic interferences and micro
strip parasitic effects. Generally, N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas system is
good for many RF and microwave applications. The micro strip line feed technique
enhances the bandwidth of the simple micro strip antenna. Every N-turn multilayer
circular coil antenna has a parasitic DC resistance which needs to be calculated.
Index (i) indicates the first N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna (i = 1) or second
N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna (i = 2). We define RFID’s N-turn multilayer
coil antenna parameters, ai—Average radius of the coil in cm, Ni—number of turns,
bi—winding thickness in cm, Si—wire cross section area, mi—radius of the wire
and hi—winding height in cm. Integrating all those parameters gives the equations
for N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna inductance calculation [85].

0:31  ðai  Ni Þ2
Lcalci ¼ ðlH):
6  ai þ 9  hi þ 10  bi

The N turn multilayer circular coil antenna length is calculated as follows: li is the
length of one turn li ¼ 2  p  ai . lN is the length of N turn
lNi ¼ Ni  li ¼ 2  p  ai  Ni . Assumption: ai  bi ; ai þ bi  ai (Fig. 8.1).
We consider system’s two N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas are not
identical (a1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi 2 R þ ). The DC resis-
tance of the N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna:

l Ni 2  p  ai  Ni 2  ai  Ni
RDCi ¼ ¼ ¼ :
r i  Si r i  Si ri  m2i

lNi —total length of the wire, ri—conductivity of the wire (S/m), Si—wire cross
section area (p  m2i ), mi—radius of the wire. Due to electromagnetic interference
there are differences in time delays with respect to the first (i = 1) and second (i = 2)
N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna voltages and voltages derivatives.
The delayed voltages are V1 ðt  s1 Þ and V2 ðt  s2 Þ respectively (s1 6¼ s2 ) and
delayed voltages derivatives are dV1 ðtD dt
1 Þ dV2 ðtD2 Þ
; dt respectively. Assumption:
786 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Fig. 8.1 N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas transceiver system

D1 6¼ D2 ; s1 [ 0; s2 [ 0; D1 ; D2  0. Additionally, there is a delay in time for the


micro strip parasitic effects Dl . The stability of a given steady state is simply
determined by the graphs of some function of s1 ; s2 which can be expressed,
explicitly and thus can be easily depicted by MATLAB and other popular software.
We need only look at one such function and locate the zeros. At time delay
increases, stability changes from stable to unstable to stable. The analytical criteria
provided for the first and second order cases can be used to obtain some insightful
analytical statements and can be helpful for conducting simulations. N-turn mul-
tilayer circular coil antennas transceiver (RFID system) system can be represented
as two inductors (Lcalc1 and Lcalc2 ), parasitic resistances (RDC1 and RDC2 ) and
microstrip delay line. The N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas in series are
connected in parallel to RFID IC. The equivalent circuit of N-turn multilayer cir-
cular coil antennas transceiver (RFID system) is capacitor (C1) and resistor (R1) in
parallel with N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas in series. Element 2  Lm
represents the mutual inductance between Lcalc1 and Lcalc2 . Since two inductors
(Lcalc1 and Lcalc2 ) are in series and there is a mutual inductance between Lcalc1
and Lcalc2 , the total antenna inductance LT: LT ¼ Lcalc1 þ Lcalc2 þ 2  Lm and
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Q2
Lm ¼ K  i¼1 Lcalci , Lm is the mutual inductance between Lcalc1 and Lcalc2 , K
is the coupling coefficient of two inductors 0  K  1. Variable I(t) is the current
that flows through a N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas transceiver system for
Dl ! e. The V1 and V2 are the voltages on Lcalc1 and Lcalc2 respectively, Vm is
the voltage on N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas mutual inductance element.
We neglect the voltage on microstrip delay line Vl ! e. The delay which is related
to microstrip element is on current ILcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ ILcalc1 ðt  Dl Þ and
IRDCi ¼ ILcalci ; i ¼ 1; 2. N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system
equivalent circuit is present in the next figure (Fig. 8.2).
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 787

Fig. 8.2 N-turn multilayer


circular coil antennas
equivalent circuit

ILcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ; IRDC2 ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ; ILm ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ


VAB VA  VB dVAB dðVA  VB Þ
IR 1 ¼ ¼ ; I C1 ¼ C 1  ¼ C1  ; IðtÞ þ IR1 þ IC1 ¼ 0
R1 R1 dt dt
VAB ¼ VR1 ¼ VC1 ; VAB ¼ VRDC1 þ VLcalc1 þ VRDC2 þ VLcalc2 þ VLm ;
V1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 ¼ VLcalc1 ðtÞ
Z
1
V2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 ¼ VLcalc2 ðtÞ; VAB ¼ VA  VB ¼ R1  IR1 ; VAB ¼  IC1  dt;
C1
VAB dVAB
IðtÞ þ þ C1  ¼0
R1 dt
VAB ¼ VRDC1 þ VLcalc1 þ VRDC2 þ VLcalc2 þ Vm þ ðVl ! eÞ; Vm ¼ VLm ;
X
2 X
2
VAB ¼ VRDCi þ VLcalci þ Vm þ ðVl ! eÞ
i¼1 i¼1
2  a1  N1
VRDC1 ¼ IðtÞ  RDC1 ¼ IðtÞ  ;
r1  m21
2  a2  N2
VRDC2 ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ  RDC2 ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ 
r2  m22
dIðtÞ 0:31  ða1  N1 Þ2 dIðtÞ
VLcalc1 ¼ Lcalc1  ¼  ;
dt 6  a1 þ 9  h1 þ 10  b1 dt
dIðt  Dl Þ 0:31  ða2  N2 Þ2 dIðt  Dl Þ
VLcalc2 ¼ Lcalc2  ¼ 
dt 6  a2 þ 9  h2 þ 10  b2 dt
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u 2
dIðt  Dl Þ uY dIðt  Dl Þ
Vm ¼ 2  Lm  ¼ 2  K  ðt Lcalci Þ  ; Lcalc1 6¼ Lcalc2
dt i¼1
dt
VC1 dVC1
IðtÞ þ þ C1  ¼ 0;
R1 dt
788 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u 2
X
2 X
2 uY dIðt  Dl Þ
V C1 ¼ VRDCi þ VLcalci þ 2  K  ðt Lcalci Þ  þ ðVl ! eÞ
i¼1 i¼1 i¼1
dt
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u 2
dVR1 dVC1 X 2
dVRDCi X 2
dVLcalci uY d 2 Iðt  Dl Þ dVl
¼ ¼ þ þ 2  K  ðt Lcalci Þ  2
þð ! eÞ
dt dt i¼1
dt i¼1
dt i¼1
dt dt

Z
dIðtÞ 1
VLcalc1 ¼ Lcalc1  ) IðtÞ ¼  VLcalc1  dt;
dt L
Z calc1
6  a1 þ 9  h1 þ 10  b1
IðtÞ ¼ ð Þ  VLcalc1  dt
0:31  ða1  N1 Þ2
Z
dIðt  Dl Þ 1
VLcalc2 ¼ Lcalc2  ) Iðt  Dl Þ ¼  VLcalc2  dt;
dt Lcalc2
Z
6  a2 þ 9  h2 þ 10  b2
Iðt  Dl Þ ¼  VLcalc2  dt
0:31  ða2  N2 Þ2

dIðtÞ VLcalc1 dIðt  Dl Þ VLcalc2


¼ ; ¼ ;
dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc2
dIðt  Dl Þ dIðtÞ dIðt  Dl Þ dIðtÞ
j  j  X; X ! e; 
dt dt dt dt
VLcalc1 VL dIðt  Dl Þ VL
 calc2 ; Vm ¼ 2  Lm  ¼ 2  Lm  calc2 ;
Lcalc1 Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u 2
uY VL
Vm ¼ 2  K  ðt Lcalci Þ  calc2
i¼1
Lcalc2

rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVm Lcalc1 dVLcalc2
Vm ¼ 2  K  ð Þ  VLcalc2 ; ¼2K ð Þ
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 dt

We get the following differential equation respect to VLcalc1 variable:


Z
1 VAB dVAB
 VLcalc1  dt þ þ C1  ¼ 0;
Lcalc1 R1 dt
VRDC1 ¼ IðtÞ  Rdc1 ; VRDC2 ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ  Rdc2
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 789

Z
1 1 X 2 X2
 VLcalc1  dt þ ð VRDCi þ VLcalci þ Vm Þ
Lcalc1 R1 i¼1 i¼1

d X 2 X2
þ C1  ð VRDCi þ VLcalci þ Vm Þ ¼ 0
dt i¼1 i¼1

Z
1 1 X 2 X2
 VLcalc1  dt þ ð VRDCi þ VLcalci þ Vm Þ
Lcalc1 R1 i¼1 i¼1
X
2
dVR X
2
dVL dVm
þ C1  ð DCi
þ calci
þ Þ¼0
i¼1
dt i¼1
dt dt

Z X2
1 1
 VLcalc1  dt þ  fIðtÞ  Rdc1 þ Iðt  Dl Þ  Rdc2 þ VLcalci
Lcalc1 R1 i¼1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dIðtÞ dIðt  Dl Þ
þ2 K ð Þ  VLcalc2 g þ C1  f  Rdc1 þ  Rdc2
Lcalc2 dt dt
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X2
dVLcalci Lcalc1 dVLcalc2
þ þ 2  K  ð Þ g¼0
i¼1
dt Lcalc2 dt

dIðtÞ VLcalc1 dIðt  Dl Þ VLcalc2


¼ ; ¼
dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc2
Z Z Z
1 1 1 1
 VLcalc1  dt þ
f  Rdc1  VLcalc1  dt þ  Rdc2  VLcalc2  dt
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X 2
Lcalc1 VLcalc1 VL
þ VLcalci þ 2  K  ð Þ  VLcalc2 g þ C1  f  Rdc1 þ calc2  Rdc2
i¼1
L calc2 L calc1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X 2
dVLcalci Lcalc1 dVLcalc2
þ þ2K ð Þ g¼0
i¼1
dt Lcalc2 dt

We derive in time the two sides of the above equations:

1 1 1 1
 VLcalc1 þ f  Rdc1  VLcalc1 þ  Rdc2  VLcalc2
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X 2
dVLcalci Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVL Rdc1
þ þ2 K ð Þ g þ C1  f calc1 
i¼1
dt L calc2 dt dt Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVLcalc2 Rdc2 X2 2
d VLcalci Lcalc1 d VLcalc2 2
þ  þ 2
þ2  K  ð Þ g¼0
dt Lcalc2 i¼1
dt Lcalc2 dt2

VLcalc1 VL Lcalc2
’ calc2 ) VLcalc2 ¼ VLcalc1 
Lcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc1
790 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Then we get the following expression:

1 1 1 1 Lcalc2 X 2
dVLcalci
 VLcalc1 þ f  Rdc1  VLcalc1 þ  Rdc2  VLcalc1  þ
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc1 i¼1
dt
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVLcalc1 Lcalc2 dVL Rdc1 dVLcalc1 Rdc2
þ2  K  ð Þ  g þ C1  f calc1  þ 
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc1
r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X 2 2
d VLcalci Lcalc1 Lcalc2 d VLcalc12
þ þ2  K  ð Þ  g¼0
i¼1
dt2 Lcalc2 Lcalc1 dt2

X
2
d 2 VL d 2 VLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc1 Lcalc2
calci
¼ þ ¼  ð1 þ Þ;
i¼1
dt2 dt 2 dt 2 dt 2 Lcalc1
X
2
dVL dVLcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVLcalc1 Lcalc2
calci
¼ þ ¼  ð1 þ Þ
i¼1
dt dt dt dt Lcalc1

1 1 1 1
 VLcalc1 þ f  Rdc1  VLcalc1 þ Rdc2  VLcalc1 
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVLcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc1 dVLcalc1 Lcalc2
þ  ð1 þ Þþ2  K  ð Þ  g
dt Lcalc1 Lcalc2 dt Lcalc1
dVL Rdc1 dVLcalc1 Rdc2 d 2 VLcalc1 Lcalc2
þ C1  f calc1  þ  þ  ð1 þ Þ
dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc1 dt2 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 Lcalc2 d 2 VLcalc1
þ2  K  ð Þ  g¼0
Lcalc2 Lcalc1 dt2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ 1 Lcalc2 1 Lcalc2
½ þ   VLcalc1 þ ½  ð1 þ Þþ2 K  
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Rdc1 þ Rdc2 dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2
þ C1  ð Þ  þ  C1  ½1 þ þ2K  ¼0
Lcalc1 dt dt2 Lcalc1 Lcalc1

We define the following global parameters:

1 1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
g1 ¼ þ  ;
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 Lcalc2 1 Lcalc2 Rdc1 þ Rdc2
g2 ¼  ð1 þ Þþ2 K   þ C1  ð Þ
R1 Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc2 Lcalc2
g3 ¼ C1  ½1 þ þ2  K  ;
Lcalc1 Lcalc1
dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1
g1  VLcalc1 þ g2  þ g3  ¼0
dt dt2
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 791

We get the following differential equation respect to VLcalc1 :

dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1
g1  VLcalc1 þ g2  þ g3  ¼ 0; g1 ¼ g1 ðRdc1 ; Rdc2 ; Lcalc1 ; R1 Þ
dt dt2
g2 ¼ g2 ðRdc1 ; Rdc2 ; Lcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; R1 ; K; C1 Þ; g3 ¼ g3 ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; C1 ; KÞ

dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1
We define new variables: Y1 ¼ dt ; dYdt1 ¼ dt2

dY1 dY1 g g
g1  VLcalc1 þ g2  Y1 þ g3  ¼ 0; ¼  1  VLcalc1  2  Y1 ;
dt dt g3 g3
g1 ¼ g1 ðRdc1 ; Rdc2 ; Lcalc1 ; R1 Þ

In the same manner we find VLcalc2 differential equation:

1 1 1 1
 VLcalc1 þ
f  Rdc1  VLcalc1 þ  Rdc2  VLcalc2
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc2
r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X 2
dVLcalci Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVL Rdc1
þ þ2  K ð Þ g þ C1  f calc1 
i¼1
dt L calc2 dt dt Lcalc1
r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVLcalc2 Rdc2 X 2
d 2 VLcalci Lcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2
þ  þ 2
þ2  K  ð Þ g¼0
dt Lcalc2 i¼1
dt Lcalc2 dt2

VLcalc1 VL Lcalc1
’ calc2 ) VLcalc1 ¼ VLcalc2 
Lcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2

Then we get the following expression:

VLcalc2 1 Rdc1 Rdc2 X 2


dVLcalci
þ  fVLcalc2  þ  VLcalc2 þ
Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2 i¼1
dt
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVL Rdc1 dVLcalc2 Rdc2
þ2  K  ð Þ g þ C1  f calc2  þ 
Lcalc2 dt dt Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2
r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X d 2 VL
2
Lcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2
þ calci
2
þ2  K  ð Þ g¼0
i¼1
dt Lcalc2 dt2

X
2
d 2 VL d 2 VLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2 Lcalc1
calci
¼ þ ¼ ð þ 1Þ;
i¼1
dt2 dt 2 dt2 dt2 Lcalc2
X
2
dVL dVLcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVLcalc2 Lcalc1
calci
¼ þ ¼ ð þ 1Þ
i¼1
dt dt dt dt Lcalc2
792 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

VLcalc2 1 Rdc1 Rdc2 dVLcalc2 Lcalc1


þ  fVLcalc2  þ  VLcalc2 þ ð þ 1Þ
Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVL Rdc1 dVLcalc2 Rdc2
þ2  K  ð Þ g þ C1  f calc2  þ 
Lcalc2 dt dt Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2
2
r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 2
d VLcalc2 Lcalc1 Lcalc1 d VLcalc2
þ ð þ 1Þ þ 2  K  ð Þ g¼0
dt2 Lcalc2 Lcalc2 dt2

VLcalc2 1 Rdc1 1 Rdc2 dVLcalc2 1 Lcalc1


þ VLcalc2   þ   VLcalc2 þ  ð þ 1Þ
Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 dt R1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVLcalc2 C1  Rdc1 dVLcalc2 C1  Rdc2
þ2  K   ð Þ þ  þ 
R1 Lcalc2 dt dt Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2
2
r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 2
d VLcalc2 Lcalc1 Lcalc1 d VLcalc2
þ  C1  ð þ 1Þ þ 2  K  C1  ð Þ ¼0
dt2 Lcalc2 Lcalc2 dt2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 Rdc1 þ Rdc2 1 Lcalc1 1 Lcalc1
½ þ ð Þ  VLcalc2 þ ½  ð þ 1Þ þ 2  K  
Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Rdc1 þ Rdc2 dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2 Lcalc1 Lcalc1
þ C1  ð Þ  þ  C1  ½ þ1þ2  K  ¼0
Lcalc2 dt dt2 Lcalc2 Lcalc2

þ Rdc2
We define the following global parameters: n1 ¼ Lcalc2
1
þ 1
R1  ðRdc1
Lcalc2 Þ
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 Lcalc1 1 Lcalc1 Rdc1 þ Rdc2
n2 ¼ ð þ 1Þ þ 2  K   þ C1  ð Þ;
R1 Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 Lcalc1
n3 ¼ C1  ½ þ1þ2  K 
Lcalc2 Lcalc2

n1 ¼ n1 ðRdc1 ; Rdc2 ; Lcalc2 ; R1 Þ; n2 ¼ n2 ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; Rdc1 ; Rdc2 ; R1 ; K; C1 Þ;


n3 ¼ n3 ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; K; C1 Þ

dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2
n1  VLcalc2 þ n2  dt þ dt2  n3 ¼ 0. We define new variables:
dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2
Y2 ¼ dt ; dYdt2 ¼ dt2

dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2
n1  VLcalc2 þ n2  þ  n3 ¼ 0;
dt dt2
dY2 dY2 n n
n1  VLcalc2 þ n2  Y2 þ  n3 ¼ 0 ) ¼  1  VLcalc2  2  Y2
dt dt n3 n3

Summary: We can get our N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas (RFID
system) system.
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 793

dVLcalc1 dY1 g g
¼ Y1 ; ¼  1  VLcalc1  2  Y1 ;
dt dt g3 g3
dVLcalc2 dY2 n n
¼ Y2 ; ¼  1  VLcalc2  2  Y2
dt dt n3 n3
0 1
dY1 0 1 0 Y 1
dt
B dVLcalc1 C C11 ... C14 1
B dt C B .. .. .. C B B VLcalc1 C
C g2 g1
B dY2 C ¼ @ . . . A  @ Y2 A; C11 ¼  g ; C12 ¼  g ; C13
@ dt A 3 3
dVLcalc2 C41  C44 VLcalc2
dt
¼ 0; C14 ¼ 0

n2 n
C21 ¼ 1; C22 ¼ C23 ¼ C24 ¼ 0; C31 ¼ C32 ¼ 0; C33 ¼  ; C34 ¼  1 ; C41 ¼ C42 ¼ 0
n3 n3
C43 ¼ 1; C44 ¼ 0

N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas (RFID system) system is composed from
two N-turn thin wire multilayer and circular. Units are all in centimeters (cm),
ai ; hi ; bi 8 i ¼ 1; 2; Ni 2 R þ . Inductors Lcalc1 ; Lcalc2 units are in lH. Due to
electromagnetic interferences there are different in time delays respect to first and
second N-turn thin wire multilayer and circular antennas voltages and voltages
derivatives. Additionally, there is a delay in time Dl for the current that
flows through inductor Lcalc2 and mutual inductance. The delay voltages are
V1 ðt  s1 Þ; V2 ðt  s2 Þ respectively (s1 6¼ s2 ) and delayed voltages derivatives are
dV1 ðts1 Þ dV2 ðts2 Þ
dt ; dt respectively (D1 6¼ D2 ; s1  0; s2  0; D1 ; D2 2 R þ ).

V1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 ¼ VLcalc1 ðtÞ; V2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 ¼ VLcalc2 ðtÞ;


VLcalc1 ðtÞ ! VLcalc1 ðt  s1 Þ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ ! VLcalc2 ðt  s2 Þ

dV dV
We consider no delay effect on dYdt1 ; Ldt ; dt ; Ldt
calc1 dY2 calc2
. The N-turn multilayer
circular coil antennas system differential equations under electromagnetic inter-
ferences (delay terms) influence only N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas sys-
tem first and second N-turn multilayer circular coil voltages VLcalc1 ðtÞ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ and
voltages derivatives Y1 ðtÞ and Y2 ðtÞ respect to time, there is no influence on
dY1 ðtÞ dVLcalc1 ðtÞ dY2 ðtÞ dVLcalc2 ðtÞ
dt ; dt ; dt ; dt [85].
0 1
dY1 0 1 0 Y ðt  D Þ 1
dt
B dVLcalc1 C C11 . . . C14 1 1
B dt C B .. .. .. C B B VLcalc1 ðt  s1 Þ C
C
B dY2 C ¼ @ . . . A  @ Y2 ðt  D2 Þ A
@ dt A
dVLcalc2 C41    C44 VLcalc2 ðt  s2 Þ
dt
794 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

To find equilibrium points (fixed points) of N-turn multilayer circular coil


antennas RFID system is by

lim Y1 ðt  D1 Þ ¼ Y1 ðtÞ; lim VLcalc1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ VLcalc1 ðtÞ


t!1 t!1
lim Y2 ðt  D2 Þ ¼ Y2 ðtÞ; lim VLcalc2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ VLcalc2 ðtÞ:
t!1 t!1

dY1 dVLcalc1 dY2 dVLcalc2


¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; t  s1 ; t  s2 ; t  D1 ; t  D2
dt dt dt dt
ð0Þ ð0Þ
We get four equations and the only fixed point is Eð0Þ ðY1 ; VLcalc1 ;
ð0Þ ð0Þ
Y2 ; VLcalc2 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0Þ.

1 Lcalc2
g3 6¼ 0 & g2 6¼ 0 )  ð1 þ Þ
R1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 Lcalc2 Rdc1 þ Rdc2
þ2  K   þ C1  ð Þ 6¼ 0; C11 6¼ 0
R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc1
1 1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
g3 6¼ 0 & g1 6¼ 0 )C12 6¼ 0; þ  6¼ 0
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1
1 1 Rdc1 þ Rdc2
n3 6¼ 0; n1 6¼ 0 ) þ ð Þ 6¼ 0; C34 6¼ 0
Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 Lcalc1 1 Lcalc1
n3 6¼ 0; n2 6¼ 0 )  ð þ 1Þ þ 2  K  
R1 Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2
Rdc1 þ Rdc2
þ C1  ð Þ 6¼ 0; C33 6¼ 0
Lcalc2

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points (fixed points) of N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID
system consists in adding to coordinates [Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 ] arbitrarily small
increments of exponential form ½y1 vLcalc1 y2 vLcalc2  ekt , and retaining the first order
terms in Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 . The system of four homogeneous equations leads to a
polynomial characteristics equation in the eigenvalues k. The polynomial charac-
teristics equations accept by set the below voltages and voltages derivative respect
to the time into N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system equations.
N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system fixed values with arbitrarily
small increments of exponential form ½Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2  ekt are: i = 1 (first fixed
point), i = 2 (second fixed point), i = 3 (third fixed point), etc.,

ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ekt
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 795

We choose the above expressions for our Y1 ðt),VLcalc1 ðt),Y2 ðt),VLcalc2 ðt) as small
displacement ½y1 vLcalc1 y2 vLcalc2 from the system fixed points at time t = 0.

ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ; VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y2 þ y2 ; VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2

For t > 0, k < 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise t > 0, k > 0 is
unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for t > 0, k < 0
otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. Eigenvalue k is the
parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or unstable, additionally his
absolute value (|k|) establish the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point. Table 8.1 describes N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID
system variables for different eigenvalue k and t values.
The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for N-turn
multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system voltages and voltages derivatives
respect to time are as follow:

dY1 ðtÞ dVLcalc1 ðtÞ


¼ y1  k  ekt ; ¼ vLcalc1  k  ekt ;
dt dt
dY2 ðtÞ dVLcalc2 ðtÞ
¼ y2  k  ekt ; ¼ vLcalc2  k  ekt
dt dt

Table 8.1 N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system variables for different eigenvalue
k and time
k<0 k>0
t=0 ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y1 þ y1 Y1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y1 þ y1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y2 þ y2 Y2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y2 þ y2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
t>0 Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ejkjt Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ejkjt VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ejkjt Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ejkjt VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ejkjt
t!∞ Y1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ Y1
ðiÞ
Y1 ðt ! 1Þ ’ y1  ejkjt
VLcalc1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ VLcalc1
ðiÞ VLcalc1 ðt ! 1Þ ’ vLcalc1  ejkjt

Y2 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ Y2
ðiÞ Y2 ðt ! 1Þ ’ y2  ejkjt

VLcalc2 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ VLcalc2
ðiÞ VLcalc2 ðt ! 1Þ ’ vLcalc2  ejkjt
796 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

dVLcalc1 ðiÞ ðiÞ


¼ Y1 ) vLcalc1  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y1 ¼ 0; vLcalc1  k þ y1 ¼ 0
dt
dY1 g g
¼  1  VLcalc1  2  Y1
dt g3 g3

g1 ðiÞ g ðiÞ
) y1  k  ekt ¼   ðVLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ekt Þ  2  ðY1 þ y1  ekt Þ
g3 g3
g1 ðiÞ g ðiÞ g g
y1  k  ekt ¼   VLcalc1  2  Y1  1  vLcalc1  ekt  2  y1  ekt ;
g3 g3 g3 g3
g1 ðiÞ g2 ðiÞ
  VLcalc1   Y1 ¼ 0
g3 g3
g1 g
 y1  k   vLcalc1  2  y1 ¼ 0;
g3 g3
dVLcalc2 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ Y2 ) vLcalc2  k  ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y2 ¼ 0
dt
dY2 n n
 vLcalc2  k þ y2 ¼ 0; ¼  1  VLcalc2  2  Y2
dt n3 n3
n ðiÞ n ðiÞ
) y2  k  ekt ¼   ðVLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ekt Þ  2  ðY2 þ y2  ekt Þ
1
n3 n3

n1 ðiÞ n ðiÞ n n
y2  k  ekt ¼  V  2  Y  1  vLcalc2  ekt  2  y2  ekt ;
n3 Lcalc2 n3 2 n3 n3
n1 ðiÞ n2 ðiÞ
 V   Y2 ¼ 0
n3 Lcalc2 n3

n1 n
y2  k   vLcalc2  2  y2 ¼ 0
n3 n3

We can summary our N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system
arbitrarily small increments equations:
g2 g
 vLcalc1  k þ y1 ¼ 0; y1  k   y1  1  vLcalc1 ¼ 0; vLcalc2  k þ y2 ¼ 0;
g3 g3
n2 n
 y2  k   y2  1  vLcalc2 ¼ 0
n3 n3
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 797

0 1 0 y1 1
!11 . . . !14
B . Bv C
B . .. .. C
C B Lcalc1 C g2 g1
@ . . . AB
@ y2 A
C ¼ 0; !11 ¼ k  ; !12 ¼  ;
g3 g3
!41    !44 v Lcalc2
!13 ¼ 0; !14 ¼ 0; !21 ¼ 1
n2
!22 ¼ k; !23 ¼ 0; !24 ¼ 0; !31 ¼ 0; !32 ¼ 0; !33 ¼ k  ;
n3
n1
!34 ¼  ; !41 ¼ 0
n3
!42 ¼ 0; !43 ¼ 1; !44 ¼ k
0 1
!11 . . . !14
B . .. .. C X4
AkI ¼B @ .
. . .
C; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 )
A kk  Pk ¼ 0;
k¼0
!41    !44
g n g n g n
P0 ¼ 1 1 ; P1 ¼ 2 1 þ 1 2
g3  n3 g3  n3 g3  n3
n g n g n g
P2 ¼ 1 þ 2 2 þ 1 ; P3 ¼ 2 þ 2 ; P4 ¼ 1
n3 g3  n3 g3 n3 g3

Eigenvalues stability discussion: Our N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas


RFID system involving Na variables (Na > 2, Na = 4), the characteristic equation is
P
of degree Na = 4 ( 4k¼0 kk  Pk ¼ 0) and must often be solved numerically. Expect
in some particular cases, such an equation has (Na = 4) distinct roots that can be real
or complex. These values are the eigenvalues of the 4  4 Jacobian matrix (A). The
general rule is that the Steady State (SS) is stable if there is no eigenvalue with
positive real part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is positive for the steady state to
be unstable. Our 4-variables (Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 ) N-turn multilayer circular coil
antennas RFID system has four eigenvalues. The type of behavior can be charac-
terized as a function of the position of these eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. Five
non-degenerated cases can be distinguished: (1) the four eigenvalues are real and
negative (stable steady state), (2) the four eigenvalues are real, three of them are
negative (unstable steady state), (3) and (4) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates
with a negative real part and the other eigenvalues are real and negative (stable
steady state), two cases can be distinguished depending on the relative value of the
real part of the complex eigenvalues and of the real one, (5) two eigenvalues are
complex conjugates with a negative real part and at least one eigenvalue is positive
(unstable steady state) [2, 3].
We define the following N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system
variables delayed in time:
798 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðt  D1 Þ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekðtD1 Þ ; VLcalc1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ekðts1 Þ ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y2 ðt  D2 Þ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekðtD2 Þ ; VLcalc2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ekðts2 Þ

We get four delayed differential equations respect to coordinates


[Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 ] arbitrarily small increments of exponential
½y1 vLcalc1 y2 vLcalc2  e .
kt

ðiÞ ðiÞ
vLcalc1  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekðtD1 Þ ; Y1 ¼ 0; vLcalc1  k þ y1  ekD1 ¼ 0
g ðiÞ g ðiÞ
y1  k  ekt ¼  1  ðVLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ekðts1 Þ Þ  2  ðY1 þ y1  ekðtD1 Þ Þ
g3 g3
g ðiÞ g ðiÞ g g
y1  k  ekt ¼  1  VLcalc1  2  Y1  1  vLcalc1  ekðts1 Þ  2  y1  ekðtD1 Þ
g3 g3 g3 g3
g1 ðiÞ g2 ðiÞ g1 ks1 g
  VLcalc1   Y1 ¼ 0; y1  k   vLcalc1  e  2  y1  ekD1 ¼ 0
g3 g3 g3 g3
dVLcalc2 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ Y2 ; vLcalc2  k  ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekðtD2 Þ ; Y2 ¼ 0; vLcalc2  k þ y2  ekD2 ¼ 0
dt
n ðiÞ n ðiÞ n
y2  k  ekt ¼  1  ðVLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ekðts2 Þ Þ  2  Y2  2  y2  ekðtD2 Þ
n3 n3 n3
n ðiÞ n ðiÞ n n
y2  k  ekt ¼   VLcalc2   Y2   vLcalc2  ekðts2 Þ  2  y2  ekðtD2 Þ
1 2 1
n3 n3 n3 n3
n1 ðiÞ n2 ðiÞ n1 n
  VLcalc2   Y2 ¼ 0; y2  k   vLcalc2  eks2  2  y2  ekD2 ¼ 0
n3 n3 n3 n3

The small increments Jacobian of our N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas
RFID system is as follow:
g2 kD1 g
½k  e  y1  1  eks1  vLcalc1 ¼ 0; vLcalc1  k þ y1  ekD1 ¼ 0
g3 g3
n n
½k  2  ekD2  y2  1  eks2  vLcalc2 ¼ 0; vLcalc2  k þ y2  ekD2 ¼ 0
n3 n
0 3 1
0 1 y1
i11 . . . i14 B C
B . . . C B B vLcalc1 C
C g2
B . . . .. C C ¼ 0; i11 ¼ k   ekD1 ;
@ . AB B C g3
@ y2 A
i41    i44
vLcalc2
g1 ks1
i12 ¼   e ; i13 ¼ i14 ¼ 0
g3

n2 kD2 n
i21 ¼ ekD1 ; i22 ¼ k; i23 ¼ i24 ¼ 0; i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k  e ; i34 ¼  1  eks2
n3 n3
i41 ¼ i42 ¼ 0; i43 ¼ ekD2 ; i44 ¼ k
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 799

0 1
i11 . . . i14
B . . C
AkI ¼B @ .. . . ... C
A; det jA  k  Ij ¼ 0; D ¼ Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ
i41    i44
n n g g
C33 ¼  2 ; C34 ¼  1 ; C11 ¼  2 ; C12 ¼  1 ; i33 ¼ k þ C33  ekD2 ;
n3 n3 g3 g3
i34 ¼ C34  eks2
i11 ¼ k þ C11  ekD1 ; i12 ¼ C12  eks1

Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k4  k3  C33  ekD2  k2  C34  ekðD2 þ s2 Þ  k3  C11  ekD1


P 2 P2
k Di kðs2 þ Di Þ
þ k2  C11  C33  e i¼1 þ k  C11  C34  e i¼1  k2  C12  ekðs1 þ D1 Þ
P
2 P
2 P
2
kðs1 þ Di Þ kð si þ Di Þ
þ k  C12  C33  e i¼1 þ C12  C34  e i¼1 i¼1

P
2 P
2 P
2
kð si þ Di Þ kðs2 þ Di Þ
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k þ C12  C34  e
4 i¼1 i¼1 þ k  ½C11  C34  e i¼1

P2 P
2
kðs1 þ Di Þ k Di
þ C12  C33  e i¼1 þ k2  ½C11  C33  e i¼1  C12  ekðs1 þ D1 Þ  C34  ekðD2 þ s2 Þ
kD2 kD1
 k  ½C33  e
3
þ C11  e

We have three stability cases: (1) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s & D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ 0 (2) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0


& D1 ¼ D; D2 ¼ D (3) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD & D1 ¼ sD ; D2 ¼ sD . Otherwise s1 6¼ s2 and
D1 6¼ D2 , they are positive parameters. There are other possible simple stability
cases: (4) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 (5) s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 (6) s1 ¼ 0;
s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D; D2 ¼ 0 (7) s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ D.
We need to get characteristics equations for all above stability analysis cases. We
study the occurrence of any possible stability switching resulting from the increase
the value of time delays s; D; sD for the general characteristic equation
Dðk; s=D=sD Þ. If we choose s parameter then Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks .
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is

X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ  kk ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ p1 ðsÞ  k þ p2 ðsÞ  k2 þ . . .
k¼0

The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is

X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 þ . . .
k¼0
800 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

First we analyze the case when there is delay in first (i = 1) RFID’s N-turn
multilayer coil antenna voltage (s1 ¼ s) and there is no delay in second (i = 2)
RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antenna voltage (s2 ¼ s). Additionally there is
no delay in RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antenna voltages derivatives
(D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ 0).
The general characteristic equation Dðk; sÞ is as follow:

Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; D1¼0 ; D2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ C12  C34  eks þ k  ½C11  C34


þ C12  C33  eks þ k2  ½C11  C33  C34  C12  eks  k3  ½C33 þ C11

Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; D1¼0 ; D2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11 þ k2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þ


þ k  C11  C34 þ ðk2  C12 þ k  C12  C33 þ C12  C34 Þ  eks

Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 2; n [ m

The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ:

X
n¼4
Pn¼4 ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ  kk ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ p1 ðsÞ  k þ p2 ðsÞ  k2 þ p3 ðsÞ  k3 þ p4 ðsÞ  k4
k¼0
p0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p1 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C34 ; p2 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C33  C34 ; p3 ðsÞ ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; p4 ðsÞ ¼ 1

The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ:

X
m¼2
Qm¼2 ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2
k¼0

q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12  C34 ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ C12  C33 ; q2 ðsÞ ¼ C12 . The homogeneous system
for Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 leads to a characteristic equation for the eigenvalue k having
P P
the form PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ; PðkÞ ¼ 4j¼0 aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼ 2j¼0 cj  k j and the
coefficients faj ðqi ; qk Þ; cj ðqi ; qk Þg 2 R depend on qi ; qk but not on s, qi ; qk are any
RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antennas system’s parameters, other parameters keep
as a constant.

a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ C11  C34 ; a2 ¼ C11  C33  C34 ; a3 ¼ ðC33 þ C11 Þ; a4 ¼ 1;


c0 ¼ C12  C34 ; c1 ¼ C33  C12 ; c2 ¼ C12 :

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the variation arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, and cj. The coefficients aj, and cj are
continuous, and differential functions of their arguments, and direct substitution
shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ (C12  C34 6¼ 0). k = 0 is not a of
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0. Furthermore, PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions of k, for
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 801

which the following requirements of the analysis [BK] can also be verified in the
present case [4–6]:
(a) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R, then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ
PðkÞ j is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek  0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable
respect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðkÞ cannot have common
imaginary roots. That is for any real number x: Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0.

Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ ðC11  C34  x þ ½C33 þ C11  x3 Þ  i  ðC11  C33  C34 Þ  x2 þ x4


Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C34 þ C12  x2 þ C12  C33  i  x

Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C34 þ ðC12  C11  C33 þ C34 Þ  x2 þ x4


þ ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33 Þ  i  x þ i  ½C33 þ C11  x3 6¼ 0

jPn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞj2 ¼ ðC11  C34  x þ ½C33 þ C11  x3 Þ2 þ ððC11  C33  C34 Þ  x2 þ x4 Þ2


¼ C211  C234  x2 þ ½C33 þ C11 2  x6 þ 2  C11  C34  ½C33 þ C11  x4
þ ðC11  C33  C34 Þ2  x4 þ x8  2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þ  x6

jPn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞj2 ¼ jPði  xÞj2 ¼ x8 þ f½C33 þ C11 2  2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þg  x6


þ ð2  C11  C34  ½C33 þ C11 þ ðC11  C33  C34 Þ2 Þ  x4 þ C211  C234  x2

jQm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞj2 ¼ ðC12  C34 þ C12  x2 Þ2 þ C212  C233  x2 ¼ C212  C234 þ C212  x4
þ 2  C212  C34  x2 þ C212  C233  x2

jQm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 ¼ C212  C234 þ ð2  C34 þ C233 Þ  C212  x2 þ C212  x4

FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ x8 þ f½C33 þ C11 2  2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þg  x6
þ ð2  C11  C34  ½C33 þ C11 þ ðC11  C33  C34 Þ2 Þ  x4 þ C211  C234  x2  C212  C234
 ð2  C34 þ C233 Þ  C212  x2  C212  x4

FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ x8 þ f½C33 þ C11 2  2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þg  x6
þ fð2  C11  C34  ½C33 þ C11 þ ðC11  C33  C34 Þ2 Þ  C212 g  x4
þ fC211  C234  ð2  C34 þ C233 Þ  C212 g  x2  C212  C234
802 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

We define the following parameters for simplicity: N0 ¼ C212  C234

N2 ¼ C211  C234  ð2  C34 þ C233 Þ  C212 ; N4 ¼ 2  C11  C34  ½C33 þ C11


þ ðC11  C33  C34 Þ2  C212
N6 ¼ ½C33 þ C11 2  2  ðC11  C33  C34 Þ; N8 ¼ 1

FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ N8  x8 þ N6  x6 þ N4  x4 þ N2  x2 þ N0


X4
¼ N2k  x2k
k¼0

P
Hence FðxÞ ¼ 0 implies 4k¼0 N2k  x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ ðC11  C33  C34 Þ  x2 þ x4

PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ C11  C34  x þ ½C33 þ C11  x3 ; QR ði  x; sÞ


¼ C12  C34 þ C12  x2 ; QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C33  x

Hence

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2

And

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2

 fðC11  C33  C34 Þ  x2 þ x4 g  C12  C33  x


þ fC11  C34  x þ ½C33 þ C11  x3 g  fC12  C34 þ C12  x2 g
sin hðsÞ ¼
C212  C234 þ C212  x4 þ 2  C212  C34  x2 þ C212  C233  x2

fðC11  C33  C34 Þ  x2 þ x4 g  fC12  C34 þ C12  x2 g


þ fC11  C34  x þ ½C33 þ C11  x3 g  C12  C33  x
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
C212  C234 þ C212  x4 þ 2  C212  C34  x2 þ C212  C233  x2
P
Which jointly with FðxÞ ¼ 0 ) 4k¼0 N2k  x2k ¼ 0 that are continuous and
differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use Theorem 1.2 and this prove
the Theorem 1.3.
The second case we analyze is when there is a delay in first (i = 1) and second
(i = 2) RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antennas voltages (s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s) and no
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 803

delay in RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antennas voltages derivatives D1 ¼ 0


D2 ¼ 0. The general characteristic equation Dðk; sÞ is as follow:

P
2 P
2 P
2
kð si þ Di Þ kðs2 þ Di Þ
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k þ C12  C34  e
4 i¼1 i¼1 þ k  ½C11  C34  e i¼1

P2 P
2
kðs1 þ Di Þ k Di
þ C12  C33  e i¼1 þ k2  ½C11  C33  e i¼1  C12  ekðs1 þ D1 Þ
 C34  ekðD2 þ s2 Þ  k3  ½C33  ekD2 þ C11  ekD1

Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ C12  C34  ek2s þ k  ½C11  C34  eks


þ C12  C33  eks þ k2  ½C11  C33  C12  eks  C34  eks  k3  ½C33 þ C11

Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11 þ k2  C11  C33


þ ðC12  C34  eks þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  k2  ½C12 þ C34 Þ  eks

Under Taylor series approximation: eks  1  k  s þ 12  k2  s2 . The Maclaurin


series is a Taylor series expansion of a expðk  sÞ function about zero (0). We get
the following general characteristic equation D(k,s) under Taylor series approxi-
mation: eks  1  k  s þ 12  k2  s2 .

Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11 þ k2  C11  C33


1
þ ðC12  C34  ½1  k  s þ  k2  s2 þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33
2
ks
 k  ½C12 þ C34 Þ  e
2

Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11 þ k2  C11  C33


1
þ fk2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ
2
þ C12  C34 g  eks

Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 2; n [ m:

The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ:

X
n¼4
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11 þ k2  C11  C33 ; Pn¼4 ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ  kk
k¼0
X
n¼4
pk ðsÞ  kk ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ p1 ðsÞ  k þ p2 ðsÞ  k2 þ p3 ðsÞ  k3 þ p4 ðsÞ  k4
k¼0
804 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

p0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p2 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C33 ; p3 ðsÞ ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; p4 ðsÞ ¼ 1

1
Qm¼2 ðk; sÞ ¼ k2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12
2
 C34  sÞ þ C12  C34

X
k¼2
Qm¼2 ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 þ q1  k þ q2  k2 ; q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12  C34
k¼0
1
q2 ðsÞ ¼  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
2

The homogeneous system for Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 leads to characteristic equation


P
for the eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks , Pðk; sÞ ¼ 4j¼0 aj ðsÞ
P
k j QðkÞ ¼ 2j¼0 cj ðsÞ  k j and the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R
depend on qi ; qk and delay s, qi ; qk are any RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antennas
system’s parameters, other parameters keep as a constant.

a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ C11  C33 ; a3 ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; a4 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ C12  C34


1
c1 ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s; c2 ¼  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the variation arguments (qi ; qk ; s)


will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, and cj. The coefficients aj, cj are
continuous and differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution
shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; C12  C34 6¼ 0 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e. k ¼ 0 is not a
Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks . We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is for any real number x: Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0.

Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  C11  C33 þ i  x3  ½C33 þ C11


1
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ þ C12  C34
2
þ i  x  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ

1
Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 þ C11  C33
2
þ C12  C34 þ i  fx3  ½C33 þ C11 þ x  ðv11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞg 6¼ 0

jPn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞj2 ¼ jPði  xÞj2 ¼ ðx4  x2  C11  C33 Þ2 þ x6  ½C33 þ C11 2


¼ x8 þ x6  ð½C33 þ C11 2  2  C11  C33 Þ þ x4  C211  C233
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 805

jPn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞj2 ¼ jPði  xÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  ð½C33 þ C11 2  2  C11  C33 Þ þ x4  C211  C233

1
jQm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 ¼ ðx2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ þ C12  C34 Þ2
2
þ x2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ2

1
jQm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 ¼ x4  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ2
2
þ x  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ2
2

1
 2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ  C12  C34 g þ C212  C234
2

We need to find the expression for FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2

FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  ð½C33 þ C11 2  2  C11  C33 Þ


1
þ x4  fC211  C233  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ2 g
2
 x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ2
1
 2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ  C12  C34 g  C212  C234
2

We define the following parameters for simplicity:

N0 ¼ C212  C234 ; N2 ¼ ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ2


1
þ 2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ  C12  C34
2
1
N4 ¼ C211  C233  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ2 ;
2
N6 ¼ ½C33 þ C11 2  2  C11  C33 ; N8 ¼ 1
X
4
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ N2k  x2k
k¼0
¼ N0 þ N2  x2 þ N4  x4 þ N6  x6 þ N8  x8
P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 N2k  x
2k
¼ 0 and its roots are given by
solving the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2 
C11  C33 ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  ½C33 þ C11
3
806 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

1
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ þ C12  C34 ;
2
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ

Hence

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2

And

PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2

ðx4  x2  C11  C33 Þ  ½x  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ


þ x3  ½C33 þ C11  ½x2  ð12  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ þ C12  C34
sin hðsÞ ¼
x4  ð12  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ2 þ x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ2
2  ð12  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ  C12  C34 g þ C212  C234

ðx4  x2  C11  C33 Þ  ½x2  ð12  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ þ C12  C34
þ x4  ½C33 þ C11  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼  4 1
x  ð2  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ2 þ x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ2
2  ð12  C12  C34  s2  C12  C34 Þ  C12  C34 g þ C212  C234

Those are continuous and differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use
Theorem 1.2 and this approve the Theorem 1.3.
The third case we analyze is when there is a delay in first (i = 1) and second (i = 2)
RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antennas voltages and antennas voltages derivatives
(s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD ). The general characteristic equation Dðk; sD Þ is as
follow:

P
2 P
2 P
2
kð si þ Di Þ kðs2 þ Di Þ
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k þ C12  C34  e
4 i¼1 i¼1 þ k  ½C11  C34  e i¼1

P2 P
2
kðs1 þ Di Þ k Di
þ C12  C33  e i¼1 þ k2  ½C11  C33  e i¼1  C12  ekðs1 þ D1 Þ
 C34  ekðD2 þ s2 Þ
 k3  ½C33  ekD2 þ C11  ekD1
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 807

Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD Þ ¼ k4 þ C12  C34  ek4sD þ k  ½C11  C34  ek3sD


þ C12  C33  ek3sD þ k2  ½C11  C33  ek2sD  C12  ek2sD  C34  ek2sD
 k3  ½C33  eksD þ C11  eksD

Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD Þ
¼ k4 þ C12  C34  ek4sD þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  ek3sD
þ k2  ½C11  C33  C12  C34  ek2sD  k3  ½C33 þ C11  eksD
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD Þ
¼ k4 þ ðC12  C34  ek3sD þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  ek2sD
þ k2  ½C11  C33  C12  C34  eksD  k3  ½C33 þ C11 Þ  eksD

The Maclaurin series is a Taylor series expansion of ek3sD ; ek2sD ; eksD


functions about zero (0). We get the following general characteristic equation
Dðk; sD Þ under Taylor series approximation:

ek3sD ’ 1  k  3  sD ; ek2sD ’ 1  k  2  sD ;
eksD ’ 1  k  sD :

Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD Þ ¼ k4 þ ðC12  C34  ð1  k  3  sD Þ


þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  ð1  k  2  sD Þ þ k2  ½C11  C33  C12  C34  ð1  k  sD Þ
 k3  ½C33 þ C11 Þ  eksD

Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD Þ ¼ k4 þ ðC12  C34 þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33


 C12  C34  3  sD Þ þ k2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ
 k3  f½C11  C33  C12  C34  sD þ C33 þ C11 gÞ  eksD

Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD Þ ¼ k4 þ ðC12  C34 þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33


 C12  C34  3  sD Þ þ k2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ
þ k3  f½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 gÞ  eksD

Dðk; sD Þ ¼ Pn ðk; sD Þ þ Qm ðk; sD Þ  eksD ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 3; n [ m

The expression for Pn ðk; sD Þ:

p0 ðsD Þ ¼ 0; p1 ðsD Þ ¼ 0; p2 ðsD Þ ¼ 0; p3 ðsD Þ ¼ 0; p4 ðsD Þ ¼ 1

X
n¼4
Pn¼4 ðk; sD Þ ¼ pk ðsD Þ  kk ¼ p0 ðsD Þ þ p1 ðsD Þ  k þ p2 ðsD Þ  k2 þ p3 ðsD Þ  k3 þ p4 ðsD Þ  k4
k¼0

Pn ðk; sD Þ ¼ k4
808 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

The expression for Qm ðk; sD Þ:

q0 ðsD Þ ¼ C12  C34 ; q1 ðsD Þ ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD

q2 ðsD Þ ¼ C11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD ;


q3 ðsD Þ ¼ ½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11
X
m¼3
Qm¼3 ðk; sD Þ ¼ qk ðsD Þ  kk ¼ q0 ðsD Þ þ q1 ðsD Þ  k þ q2 ðsD Þ  k2 þ q3 ðsD Þ  k3
k¼0

Qm ðk; sD Þ ¼ C12  C34 þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ


þ k2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ
þ k3  f½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 g

The homogenous system for Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 lead to a characteristic


equation for the eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sD Þ þ Qðk; sD Þ  eksD ¼ 0
P
4 P
3
Pðk; sD Þ ¼ aj ðsD Þ  k j ; Qðk; sD Þ ¼ cj ðsD Þ  k j and the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ;
j¼0 j¼0
cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on qi ; qk and delay sD , qi ; qk are any RFID’s N-turn
multilayer coil antennas system’s parameters, other parameters keep as a constant.

a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ 0; a3 ¼ 0; a4 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ C12  C34 ;
c1 ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD ;
c2 ¼ C11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD ;
c3 ¼ ½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the variation arguments (qi ; qk ) will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, and cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous
and differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 þ c0 6¼ 0 ) C12  C34 6¼ 0 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , k = 0 is not a Pðk; sD Þ þ
Qðk; sD Þ  eksD ¼ 0. We assume that Pn ðk; sD Þ; Qm ðk; sD Þ can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is for any real number x: Pn ðk ¼ i  x; sD Þ;
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sD Þ 6¼ 0.

Pn ðk; sD Þ ¼ x4 ;Qm ðk; sD Þ ¼ C12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34


 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ þ i  fx  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 x3  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 809
Pn ðk; sD Þ þ Qm ðk; sD Þ ¼ C12  C34  x  ðC11  C33  C12  C34
2

 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ þ x4 þ i  fx  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 x3  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg 6¼ 0

jPði  x; sD Þj2 ¼ x8
jQði  x; sD Þj2 ¼ fC12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34
 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg2 þ fx  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33
 C12  C34  3  sD Þ  x3  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg2

jQði  x; sD Þj2 ¼ C212  C234 þ x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2
 2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg
þ x4  fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ2
 2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ  ð½C11  C33 þ C12
þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg þ x6  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þ2

We need to find the expression: Fðx; sD Þ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2

Fðx; sD Þ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ C212  C234  x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2
 2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg
 x4  fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ2
 2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg
 x6  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þ2 þ x8

We define the following parameters for simplicity: N0 ¼ C212  C234

N2 ¼ fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2  2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34
 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg
N4 ¼ fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ2
 2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg
N6 ¼ ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þ2 ; N8 ¼ 1

X
4
Fðx; sD Þ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ N2k  x2k
k¼0
¼ N0 þ N2  x2 þ N4  x4 þ N6  x6 þ N8  x8
810 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

P
4
Hence Fðx; sD Þ ¼ 0 implies N2k  x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. Furthermore, PR ði  x; sD Þ ¼ x4 ; PI ði  x; sD Þ ¼ 0

QR ði  x; sD Þ ¼ C12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ
QI ði  x; sD Þ ¼ x  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 x3  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þ

Hence

PR ði  x; sD Þ  QI ði  x; sD Þ þ PI ði  x; sD Þ  QR ði  x; sD Þ
sin hðsD Þ ¼
jQði  x; sD Þj2

And

PR ði  x; sD Þ  QR ði  x; sD Þ þ PI ði  x; sD Þ  QI ði  x; sD Þ
cos hðsD Þ ¼ 
jQði  x; sD Þj2

x4  fx  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ


x3  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg
sin hðsD Þ ¼ 2
C12  C234 þ x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2
2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg
þ x4  fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ2
2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg
þ x6  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þ2

x4  fC12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg
cos hðsD Þ ¼ 
C212 C234 þ x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2
2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg
þ x4  fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ2
2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg
þ x6  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þ2

Above expressions are continuous and differentiable in sD based on Lemma 1.1.


Hence we use Theorem 1.2 and this prove Theorem 1.3.
We use different parameters terminology from our last characteristics parameters
definition k ! j; pk ðsD Þ ! aj ; qk ðsD Þ ! cj ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 3; n [ m additionally Pn ðk; sD Þ !
P P
Pðk; sD Þ; Qm ðk; sD Þ ! Qðk; sD Þ then Pðk; sD Þ ¼ 4j¼0 aj  k j ; Qðk; sD Þ ¼ 2j¼0 cj  k j .

PðkÞ ¼ k4 ; Qðk; sD Þ ¼ C12  C34 þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
þ k2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ
þ k3  f½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 g
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 811

n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m and aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable func-


tion of sD such that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0. In the following “_” denotes complex and con-
jugate. PðkÞ; Qðk; sD Þ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in sD . The
coefficients:

faj ðC1 ; R1 ; RFID’sN-turn multilayer coil antennas system0s parametersÞ &


cj ðC1 ; R1 ; sD ; RFID’sN-turn multilayer coil antennas system0s parameters) g 2 R

depend on RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antennas system’s parameters C1, R1, sD
values and antennas parameters. Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the
variation arguments. Resistor R1, capacitor C1, sD and N-turn multilayer coil
antennas system’s parameters will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The
coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their arguments, and
direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; C12  C34 6¼ 0.

g1 n1
C12  C34 6¼ 
g3 n3
P
2 P
2
ð Rdci Þ Rdci
1
Lcalc1 þ 1
R1 
Lcalc1
i¼1 1
þ 1
 ð i¼1
Lcalc2 Þ
¼½ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ½ Lcalc2 R1
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 6¼ 0
C1  ½1 þ Lcalc2
Lcalc1 þ 2  K  LLcalc2
calc1
C1  ½Lcalc1
Lcalc2 þ 1 þ 2  K  Lcalc2
Lcalc1

8C1 ; R1 ; RFID’sN-turn multilayer coil antennas system’s parameters 2 R þ

i.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root of characteristic equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; Qðk; sD Þ are


analytic function of k for which the following requirements of the analysis (see
kuang, 1993, Sect. 3.4) can also be verified in the present case [2–4].
(a) If k ¼ i  x, x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0,
i.e. P and Q have no common imaginary roots. This condition was verified
numerically in the entire (R1, C1, N-turn multilayer coil antennas system
parameters) domain of interest.
(b) jQ(kÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek  0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
Indeed, in the limit:

C12  C34 þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ þ k2  ðC11  C33
Q(kÞ C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ þ k3  f½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 g
j j¼j j
PðkÞ k4
812 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2

Fðx; sD Þ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2


¼ C212  C234  x2  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ2
 2  C12  C34  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg
 x4  fðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ2
 2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg
 x6  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þ2 þ x8

Has at most a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x (Degree


in x8 ).
(d) Each positive root x (R1, C1, sD, N-turn multilayer coil antennas system
parameters) of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable with respect to
R1 ; C1 ; sD ; N-turn multilayer coil antennas system parameters. This condition
can only be assessed numerically.
In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have
Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ thus k ¼ i  x, x [ 0 may be on
eigenvalue of characteristic equation. The analysis consists in identifying the roots
of characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane,
where by increasing the parameters R1, C1, sD, and N-turn multilayer coil antennas
system parameters, Rek may, at the crossing, Change its sign from (−) to (+), i.e.
ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ
from a stable focus Eð0Þ ðY1 ; VLcalc1 ; Y2 ; VLcalc2 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0Þ to an unstable one,
or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the
partial derivatives with respect to C1 ; R1 ; sD and N-turn multilayer coil antennas
parameters. ^1 ðR1 Þ ¼ ð@@Re
R Þk¼ix ; C1 ; sD ; N-turn multilayer coil antennas system
k
1
parameters are constant.

@Rek
^1 ðLcalc1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; sD ¼ const;
@Lcalc1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðLcalc2 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; sD ¼ const
@Lcalc2 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsD Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; N-turn multilayer coil antennas system’s parameters
@sD k¼ix
¼ const where x 2 R þ :

When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, and
inserting k ¼ i  x Into RFID N-turn multilayer coil antennas system’s character-
istic equation, x must satisfy the following:
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 813

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin x  sD ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2

and

PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos x  sD ¼ hðxÞ ¼  :
jQði  xÞj2

Where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above equations sin x  sD and cos x  sD that, by squaring
and adding the sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2 
jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0. Note FðxÞ is dependent of sD . Now it is important to notice that if
sD 62 I (assume that I
R þ 0 is the set where xðsD Þ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for
sD 62 I; xðsD Þ is not define. Then for all sD in I xðsD Þ is satisfies that Fðx; sD Þ ¼ 0).
Then there are no positive xðsD Þ solutions for Fðx; sD Þ ¼ 0, and we cannot have
stability switches. For any sD 2 I, where xðsD Þ is a positive solution of
Fðx; sD Þ ¼ 0, we can define the angle hðsD Þ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution
of sin hðsD Þ ¼ PR ðixÞQI ðixÞ þ PI ðixÞQR ðixÞ
jQðixÞj2
; cos hðsD Þ ¼  PR ðixÞQR ðixÞ þ PI ðixÞQI ðixÞ
jQðixÞj2
and the relation between the argument hðsD Þ and xðsD Þ  sD for sD 2 I must be
xðsD Þ  sD ¼ hðsD Þ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sDn : I !
Þ þ n2p
R þ 0 given by sDn ðsD Þ ¼ hðsDxðs DÞ
; n 2 N0 ; sD 2 I. Let us introduce the functions
I ! R; Sn ðsÞ ¼ sD  sDn ðsD Þ; sD 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and differentiable
in s. In the following, the subscripts k; x; R1 ; C1 and N-turn multilayer coil
antennas system parameters (a1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; ai ; Ni ; hi ;
bi 2 R þ ) indicate the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on
^ðxÞ, remember in

kða1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi 2 R þ Þ
xða1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi 2 R þ Þ

and keeping all parameters except one (x) and sD . The derivation closely follows
that in reference [BK]. Differentiating N-turn multilayer coil antennas system
characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eksD ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter
(x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark:
x ¼ ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi ; a1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi 2 R þ

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  sD  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ
814 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i  x, and bearing Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ;
Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ and i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ that
on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains

@k i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  sD  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þ1 jk¼ix ¼ ð Þ:
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ;


Q ¼ QR þ i  QI

Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; P2


¼ P2R þ P2I :

When (x) can be any N-turn multilayer coil antennas system parameters R1, C1,
and time delay sD etc. Where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments
ði  x; xÞ, and where Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ
Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ ; xx ¼ Fx =Fx .
We define U and V:

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = sD.

PR ði  x; sD Þ ¼ x4 ; PI ði  x; sD Þ ¼ 0
QR ði  x; sD Þ ¼ C12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34
 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ
QI ði  x; sD Þ ¼ x  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 x3  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þ

PRx ¼ 4  x3 ; PIx ¼ 0; PRsD ¼ 0; PIsD ¼ 0; QRsD ¼ x2  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2

QIsD ¼ x  C12  C34  3  x3  ½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34 ; PRx  PR ¼ 4  x7 ;


PIx  PI ¼ 0; xsD ¼ FsD =Fx
QRx ¼ 2  x  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 815

QIx ¼ ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ


 3  x2  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þ
QRx  QR ¼ 2  x  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ
 fC12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg

QIx  QI ¼ fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ


 3  x2  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD
 C33  C11 Þg  fx  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 x3  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg

FsD ¼ 2  ½ðPRsD  PR þ PIsD  PI Þ  ðQRsD  QR þ QIsD  QI Þ ; PRsD ¼ 0; PIsD ¼ 0


FsD ¼ 2  fx2  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  ½C12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34
 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þ þ ðx  C12  C34  3  x3  ½C11  C33 þ C12
þ C34 Þ  ½x  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 x3  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þ g

PR  PIx ¼ 0; PI  PRx ¼ 0; QR  QIx ¼ fC12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34


 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg  fðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 3  x2  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg

QI  QRx ¼ 2  x  fx  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ


 x3  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD  C33  C11 Þg  fðC11  C33  C12  C34
 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg

V ¼ ðPR  PIsD  PI  PRsD Þ  ðQR  QIsD  QI  QRsD Þ; PR  PIsD ¼ 0; PI  PRsD ¼ 0

QR  QIsD ¼ fC12  C34  x2  ðC11  C33  C12  C34


 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2  sD Þg
 x  fC12  C34  3 þ x2  ½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34 g
QI  QRsD ¼ fx  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  3  sD Þ
 x3  ð½C11  C33 þ C12 þ C34  sD
 C33  C11 Þg  fx2  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  2g;Fðx; sD Þ ¼ 0
816 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Differentiating with respect to sD and we get

@x @x Fs
Fx  þ FsD ¼ 0; sD 2 I ) ¼ D
@sD @sD Fx
1 @Rek 1 2  ½U þ sD  jPj2 þ i  Fx @x Fs
^ ðsD Þ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ; ^ ðsD Þ ¼ Ref g; ¼ xs D ¼  D
@sD FsD þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 @sD Fx
@Rek
signf^1 ðsD Þg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@sD k¼ix
@x
@x U  @s þV
signf^1 ðsD Þg ¼ signfFx g  signfsD  þxþ D
g
@sD jPj2

We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcations)


in a N-turn multilayer coil antennas system, about the equilibrium point
ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ
E ð0Þ ðY1 ; VLcalc1 ; Y2 ; VLcalc2 Þ as a result of a variation of delay parameter sD. The
analysis consists in identifying the roots of our system characteristic equation sit-
uated on the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane where by increasing the delay
parameter sD, Re k may at the crossing, change its sign from − to +, i.e. from a
stable focus E(*) to an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature may be further
assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with respect to sD,
^1 ðsD Þ ¼ ð@@sRekÞ
D k¼ix , C1, R1 and N-turn multilayer coil antennas system
parameters are constant where x 2 R þ . We need to plot the stability switch dia-
gram based on different delay values of our N-turn multilayer coil antennas system.
Since it is a very complex function we recommend to solve it numerically rather
than analytic.

@Rek 2  ½U þ sD  jPj2 þ i  Fx
^1 ðsD Þ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@sD FsD þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2
@Rek 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  FsD  ðU þ sD  P2 Þg
^1 ðsD Þ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@sD Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2
D

The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (sD ) which fit the equa-
tion: sD ¼ xh þþ ðsðsDDÞÞ and h þ ðsD Þ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when
x ¼ x þ ðsD Þ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally when all N-turn multilayer coil
antennas system parameters are known and the stability switch due to various time
delay values sD is describe in the following expression:

signf^1 ðsD Þg ¼ signfFx ðxðsD Þ; sD Þg  signfsD  xsD ðxðsD ÞÞ þ xðsD Þ


UðxðsD ÞÞ  xsD ðxðsD ÞÞ þ VðxðsD ÞÞ
þ g
jPðxðsD ÞÞj2
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 817

Remark: we know Fðx; sD Þ ¼ 0 implies it roots xi ðsD Þ and finding those delays
values sD which xi is feasible. There are sD values which xi are complex or
imaginary numbers, then unable to analyse stability.
Lemma 1.1 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive and real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 defined for
s 2 I, which is continuous and differentiable. Assume further that if k ¼ i  x,
x 2 R, then Pn ði  x; sÞ þ Qn ði  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R hold true. The functions
Sn ðsÞ; n 2 N0 , are continuous and differentiable on I.
Theorem 1.2 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 defined for
s 2 I; I
R þ 0 , and at some s 2 I, Sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for some n 2 N0 then a pair of simple
conjugate pure imaginary roots k þ ðs Þ ¼ i  xðs Þ; k ðs Þ ¼ i  xðs Þ of
Dðk; sÞ ¼ 0 exist at s ¼ s which crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if
dðs Þ [ 0 and cross the imaginary axis from right to left if dðs Þ\0 where

dRek dSn ðsÞ


dðs Þ ¼ signf j
g ¼ signfFx ðxðs Þ; s Þg  signf j g
ds k¼ixðs Þ ds s¼s
Theorem 1.3 The characteristic equation has a pair of simple and conjugate pure
imaginary roots k ¼ xðs Þ; xðs Þ real at s 2 I if Sn ðs Þ ¼ s  sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for
some n 2 N0 . If xðs Þ ¼ x þ ðs Þ, this pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary
roots crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if d þ ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the
imaginary axis from right to left if d þ ðs Þ\0 where d þ ðs Þ ¼
signfdRe
ds jk¼ix þ ðs Þ g
k

dRek dSn ðsÞ


d þ ðs Þ ¼ signf jk¼ix þ ðs Þ g ¼ signf j g
ds ds s¼s
If xðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ, this pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary roots cross the
imaginary axis from left to right, if d ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from
dSn ðsÞ
right to left. If d ðs Þ\0 where d ðs Þ ¼ signfdRe ds jk¼ix ðs Þ g ¼ signf ds js¼s g
k

If x ðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ ¼ xðs Þ then Dðs Þ ¼ 0 and signfdRek j


þ  ds k¼ixðs Þ g ¼ 0, the

same is true when S0n ðs Þ ¼ 0 the following result can be useful in identifying
values of s where stability switches happened.
Remark: Lemma 1.1 and Theorems 1.2, 1.3: In the first and second cases
we discuss delay parameter s and in the third case we discuss delay parameter sD
[18, 19].
818 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System


Stability Optimization Under Delayed
Electromagnetic Interferences and Parasitic Effects

A double rectangular spiral antennas are constructed from two antennas, each
antenna is a rectangular spiral antenna. Antennas are connected in series with micro
strip line and to the RFID IC. A double rectangular spiral antennas system influence
by electromagnetic interferences which effect there stability behavior. Additionally,
micro strip line which connected antennas in the series has parasitic effect, delay in
time Dl . We inspect our system performances under electromagnetic interferences
and micro strip parasitic effects. Generally double spiral micro strip antenna over
rectangular patch improved the bandwidth of Mobile, WiMAX applications. Micro
strip line feed technique enhances the bandwidth of the simple micro strip antenna.
Every rectangular spiral antenna has a parasitic DC resistance which needs to be
calculated. The below figure describes the double rectangular spiral antenna system
[1, 7, 8] (Fig. 8.3).
Index (i) indicates first rectangular spiral antenna (i = 1) or second rectangular
spiral antenna (i = 2). We define RFID’s coil dimensional parameters. A0i, B0i—
Overal dimensions of the coil. Aavgi, Bavgi—Average dimensions of the coil. ti—
track thickness. wi—track width. gi—gaps between tracks. Nci—number of turns.
di—equivalent diameter of the track. Average coil area Aci = Aavgi ∙ Bavgi. Pi—
coil manufacturing technology parameter. Integrating all those parameters gives the
equations for rectangular spiral antenna inductance calculation:

Fig. 8.3 Double rectangular spiral coils antennas system


8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 819

l0 X4
2  Aavgi  Bavgi
Lcalci ¼ ð Xki  X3 Þ  NciPi ; X1i ¼ Aavgi  lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ
p k¼1;k6¼3 di  ðAavgi þ A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ
2  Aavgi  Bavgi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X2i ¼ Bavgi  lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ; X3i ¼ 2  ðAavgi þ Bavgi  A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ
di  ðBavgi þ A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ
ðAavgi þ Bavgi Þ 2  ðti þ wi Þ
X4i ¼ ; di ¼ ; Aavgi ¼ A0i  Nci  ðgi þ wi Þ;
4 p
Bavgi ¼ B0i  Nci  ðgi þ wi Þ

The rectangular spiral antenna length is calculated as follows: l0i is the length of
the first turn l0i ¼ 2  ðA0i þ B0i Þ  ðwi þ gi Þ. lk is the length of turn k + 1. We
define the following:

NX
ci 1

lTi ¼ l0i þ fA0i  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þ þ B0i  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þ


k¼1
þ A0i  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þ þ B0i  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þg
NX
C 1 NX
C 1

LTi ¼ L0i þ 2  ðA0i þ B0i Þ  ðNCi  1Þ  8  ðwi þ gi Þ  k; k ¼ NCi  1


k¼1 k¼1
LTi ¼ 2  fðA0i þ B0i Þ  ð1 þ NCi Þ  ðwi þ gi Þ  ½4  NCi  3 g

The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna: RDCi ¼ rliTiSi ¼ ri pa


lTi
2.
i
lTi—total length of the wire. ri—conductivity of the wire (mX/m). Si—Cross
section area p  a2i . ai—radius of the wire.
Remark: a2i ¼ w2i .

2  fðA0i þ B0i Þ  ð1 þ NCi Þ  ðwi þ gi Þ  ½4  NCi  3 g


RDCi ¼
ri  p  w2i

Due to electromagnetic interferences there are different in time delays respect to


first and second rectangular spiral antennas voltages and voltages derivatives.
The delayed voltages are V1(t − s1) and V2(t − s2) respectively (s1 6¼ s2) and
delayed voltages derivatives are dV1(t − D1)/dt, dV2(t − D2)/dt respectively
ðD1 6¼ D2 ; s1  0Þ;ðs2  0; D1 ; D2  0Þ. Additionally, there is a delay in time for the
micro strip parasitic effects Dl . The double rectangular spiral antenna system
equivalent circuit can represent as delayed differential equations which, depending
on variable parameters and delays. Our double rectangular spiral antennas system
delay differential and delay different model can be analytically by using delay
differential equations in dynamically. The need of the incorporation of a time delay
is often of the existence of any stage structure. It is often difficult to analytically
study models with delay dependent parameters, even if only a single discrete delay
is present. There are practical guidelines that combine graphical information with
820 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

analytical work to effectively study the local stability of models involving delay
dependent parameters. The stability of a given steady state is simply determined by
the graphs of some function of s1, s2 which can be expressed, explicitly and thus
can be easily depicted by MATLAB and other popular software. We need only look
at one such function and locate the zeros. This function often has only two zeros,
providing thresholds for stability switches. As time delay increases, stability
changes from stable to unstable to stable. We emphasize the local stability aspects
of some models with delay dependent parameters, additionally there is a general
geometric criterion that, theoretically speaking, can be applied to models with many
delays, or even distributed delays. The simplest case of a first order characteristic
equation, providing more user friendly geometric and analytic criteria for stability
switches. The analytical criteria provided for the first and second order cases can be
used to obtain some insightful analytical statements and can be helpful for con-
ducting simulations. Double rectangular spiral antennas can be represented as a two
inductors in series (Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2), parasitic resistances (RDC-1 and RDC-2) and
micro strip delay line. The rectangular spiral antennas in series are connected in
parallel to RFID TAG IC. The Equivalent Circuit of Passive RFID TAG with
double rectangular antennas is Capacitor (C1) and Resistor (R1) in parallel with
double rectangular antennas in the series [85] (Fig. 8.4).
Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2 are mostly formed by traces on planar PCB. 2 ∙ Lm element
represents the mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2. Since two inductors
(Lcalc-1, Lcalc-2) are in series and there is a mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and
Lcalc-2, the total antenna inductance LT: LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 +2 ∙ Lm and
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 . Lm is the mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2.
K is the coupling coefficient of two inductors 0  K  1. I(t) is the current that flow
through a double rectangular spiral antenna. V1 and V1 are the voltages on Lcalc-1
and Lcalc-2 respectively. Vm is the voltage on double loop antenna mutual induc-
tance element. We neglect the voltage on microstrip delay line Vl ! e. ILcalc1 ¼
IðtÞ ILcalc2 ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ; IRdc2 ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ; ILm ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ.

Fig. 8.4 Double rectangular


spiral coils antennas system
equivalent circuit
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 821

V1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 ¼ VLcalc1 ðtÞ; V2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 ¼ VLcalc2 ðtÞ


Z
1 dVAB
VAB ¼ VR1 ¼ VC1 ; VAB ¼ R1  IR1 ; VAB ¼  IC1  dt; IC1 ¼ C1  ; IðtÞ þ IC1 þ IR1 ¼ 0
C1 dt
VAB dVAB
IðtÞ þ þ C1  ¼ 0; VAB ¼ VLcalc1 þ VRdc1 þ VLcalc2 þ VRdc2 þ Vm þ ðVl ! eÞ
R1 dt
lT1 lT2
VRdc1 ¼ IðtÞ  Rdc1 ¼ IðtÞ  ; VRdc2 ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ  Rdc2 ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ 
r1  p  a21 r2  p  a22
dIðtÞ dIðt  Dl Þ
VLcalc1 ¼ Lcalc1  ; VLcalc2 ¼ Lcalc2  ;
dt dt
dIðt  Dl Þ
Vm ¼ 2  L m  ; Lcalc1 6¼ Lcalc2
dt

dVC1 VC
C1  þ 1 þ IðtÞ ¼ 0; VC1 ¼ VLcalc1 þ VRdc1 þ VLcalc2 þ VRdc2 þ Vm
dt R1
dVR1 dVC1 dVLcalc1 dVRdc1 dVLcalc2 dVRdc2 dVm
¼ ¼ þ þ þ þ
dt dt Z dt dt dt Z dt dt
1 1
IðtÞ ¼  VLcalc1  dt; Iðt  Dl Þ ¼  VLcalc2  dt
Lcalc1 Lcalc2
dIðtÞ VLcalc1 dIðt  Dl Þ VLcalc2 dIðt  Dl Þ dIðtÞ
¼ ; ¼ ;j  jX
dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc2 dt dt
dIðt  Dl Þ dIðtÞ VL VL
X ! e;  ) calc1 ¼ calc2 ;
dt dt Lcalc1 Lcalc2
dIðt  Dl Þ VL
Vm ¼ 2  Lm  ¼ 2  Lm  calc2
dt Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi VLcalc2 Lcalc1
Vm ¼ 2  K  f Lcalc1  Lcalc2 g  ¼2K  VLcalc2
Lcalc2 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVm pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi dVLcalc2 =dt Lcalc1 dVLcalc2
¼ 2  K  f Lcalc1  Lcalc2 g  ¼2K 
dt Lcalc2 Lcalc2 dt

We get the following differential equation respect to VLcalc1 variable:


Z
1 VAB dVAB
 VLcalc1  dt þ þ C1  ¼0
Lcalc1 R1 dt
Z
1 1
 VLcalc1  dt þ  ½VLcalc1 þ VRdc1 þ VLcalc2 þ VRdc2 þ Vm
Lcalc1 R1
dVL dVRdc1 dVLcalc2 dVRdc2 dVm
þ C1  ½ calc1 þ þ þ þ ¼0
dt dt dt dt dt
VRdc1 ¼ IðtÞ  Rdc1 ; VRdc2 ¼ Iðt  Dl Þ  Rdc2
822 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Z
1 1
 VLcalc1  dt þ
 ½VLcalc1 þ IðtÞ  Rdc1 þ VLcalc2
Lcalc1 R1
dVL dIðtÞ
þ Iðt  Dl Þ  Rdc2 þ Vm þ C1  ½ calc1 þ  Rdc1
dt
dt rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVLcalc2 dIðt  Dl Þ Lcalc1 dVLcalc2
þ þ  Rdc2 þ 2  K   ¼0
dt dt Lcalc2 dt

VLcalc1 dIðtÞ VLcalc2 dIðt  Dl Þ


¼ ; ¼
Lcalc1 dt Lcalc2 dt
Z Z Z
1 1 Rdc1 Rdc2

VLcalc1  dt þ  ½VLcalc1 þ  VLcalc1  dt þ VLcalc2 þ  VLcalc2  dt
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVLcalc1 VLcalc1 dVLcalc2 VL
þ2  K   VLcalc2 þ C1  ½ þ  Rdc1 þ þ calc2  Rdc2
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVLcalc2
þ2  K   ¼0
Lcalc2 dt

We derivative in time the two sides of the above equation.

VLcalc1 1 dVLcalc1 Rdc1 dVLcalc2 Rdc2


þ ½ þ  VLcalc1 þ þ  VLcalc2
Lcalc1 R1 dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc1 Rdc1 dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2
þ2  K   þ C1  ½ þ  þ
Lcalc2 dt dt2 Lcalc1 dt dt2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 2
Rdc2 dVLcalc2 Lcalc1 d VLcalc2
þ  þ2  K   ¼0
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 dt2
Lcalc2
VLcalc2 ¼  VLcalc1
Lcalc1

Then we get the following expression:

VLcalc1 1 dVLcalc1 Rdc1 Lcalc2 dVLcalc1 Rdc2


þ  þ  VLcalc1 þ  þ  VLcalc1
Lcalc1 R1 dt R1  Lcalc1 R1  Lcalc1 dt R1  Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc2 Lcalc1 dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1 C1  Rdc1 dVLcalc1
þ2K    þ C1  þ 
R1  Lcalc1 Lcalc2 dt dt2 Lcalc1 dt
C1  Lcalc2 d 2 VLcalc1 C1  Lcalc2 Rdc2 dVLcalc1
þ  þ  
Lcalc1 dt2 L Lcalc2 dt
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi calc1
C1  Lcalc2 Lcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1
þ2K    ¼0
Lcalc1 Lcalc2 dt2

rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ 1 Lcalc2 1 Lcalc2
½ þ  VLcalc1 þ ½ þ þ2  K  
Lcalc1 R1  Lcalc1 R1 R1  Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
C1  ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ dVLcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2 d 2 VLcalc1
þ  þ C1  ½1 þ þ2K   ¼0
Lcalc1 dt Lcalc1 Lcalc1 dt2
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 823

We get the following differential equation respect to VLcalc1 variable, g1 ; g2 ; g3


are global parameters.

dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1
g1  VLcalc1 þ g2  þ g3  ¼0
dt dt2
1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
g1 ¼ þ ;
Lcalc1 R1  Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc2 1 Lcalc2 C1  ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ 1
g2 ¼ þ2  K   þ þ
R1  Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc1 R1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc2 Lcalc2
g3 ¼ C1  ½1 þ þ2  K  g ;
Lcalc1 Lcalc1
g1 ¼ g1 ðR1 ; Lcalc1 Rdc1 ; Rdc2 Þ
g2 ¼ g2 ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; R1 ; C1 ; K; Rdc1 ; Rdc2 Þ;
g3 ¼ g3 ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; C1 ; KÞ

dVLcalc1 dX1 d 2 VLcalc1 dX1 g g dVLcalc1


X1 ¼ ; ¼ ; ¼  1  VLcalc1  2  X1 ; ¼ X1
dt dt dt2 dt g3 g3 dt

In the same manner we find our VLcalc2 differential equation. We get the fol-
lowing differential equation respect to VLcalc1 variable, n1 ; n2 ; n3 are global
parameters.

VLcalc1 1 dVLcalc1 Rdc1 dVLcalc2 Rdc2


þ ½ þ  VLcalc1 þ þ  VLcalc2
Lcalc1 R1 dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc1 Rdc1 dVLcalc1
þ2  K   þ C1  ½ 2
þ 
Lcalc2 dt dt Lcalc1 dt
r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d 2 VLcalc2 Rdc2 dVLcalc2 Lcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2
þ þ  þ2  K   ¼0
dt2 Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 dt2
Lcalc1
VLcalc1 ¼  VLcalc2
Lcalc2
1 1 Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 Rdc1 dVLcalc2 Rdc2
 VLcalc2 þ ½  þ  VLcalc2 þ þ  VLcalc2
Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 Lcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2 Rdc1 dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2
þ2 K   þ C1  ½  2
þ  þ
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 dt dt2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 2
Rdc2 dVLcalc2 Lcalc1 d VLcalc2
þ  þ2  K   ¼0
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 dt2
824 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

1 Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 Rdc1 1 dVLcalc2 Rdc2


 VLcalc2 þ  þ  VLcalc2 þ  þ  VLcalc2
Lcalc2 R1  Lcalc2 dt R1  Lcalc2 R1 dt R1  Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2K Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 C1  Lcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2 C1  Rdc1 dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2
þ   þ  þ  þ C1 
R1 Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 dt2 Lcalc2 dt dt2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 2
C1  Rdc2 dVLcalc2 Lcalc1 d VLcalc2
þ  þ 2  K  C1   ¼0
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 dt2

rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ Lcalc1 1 2K Lcalc1
½ þ  VLcalc2 þ ½ þ þ 
Lcalc2 R1  Lcalc2 R1  Lcalc2 R1 R1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
C1  ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ dVLcalc2 Lcalc1 Lcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2
þ  þ C1  ½1 þ þ2  K   ¼0
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 Lcalc2 dt2

rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ Lcalc1 1 2K Lcalc1
n1 ¼ þ ; n2 ¼ þ þ 
Lcalc2 R1  Lcalc2 R1  Lcalc2 R1 R1 Lcalc2
C1  ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
þ
Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 Lcalc1
n3 ¼ C1  ½1 þ þ2  K  ; n ¼ ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; R1 ; Rdc1 ; Rdc2 Þ
Lcalc2 Lcalc2 1
n2 ¼ ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; R1 ; Rdc1 ; Rdc2 ; C1 ; KÞ; n3 ¼ ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; C1 ; KÞ

We get the following differential equation respect to VLcalc2 variable, n1 ; n2 ; n3


are global parameters.

dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2 dVLcalc2 dX2 d 2 VLcalc2


n1  VLcalc2 þ n2  þ n3  ¼ 0; X2 ¼ ; ¼
dt dt2 dt dt dt2
dX2 n1 n2 dVLcalc2
¼   VLcalc2   X2 ; ¼ X2
dt n3 n3 dt

Summary: We get our RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna
system’s four differential equations.

dX1 g g dVLcalc1 dX2


¼  1  VLcalc1  2  X1 ; ¼ X1 ;
dt g3 g3 dt dt
n1 n2 dVLcalc2
¼   VLcalc2   X2 ; ¼ X2
n3 n3 dt
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 825

0 1
dX1
dt 0 1 0 X1 1
B dVL C C11 ... C14
B calc1 C B BV C
B dt C B .. .. .. C
C B Lcalc1 C g2 g1 n2
B dX2 C¼@ . . . AB C; C11 ¼  ; C12 ¼  ; C33 ¼  ;
B C @ X2 A g3 g3 n3
@ dt A
dVLcalc2 C41  C44 VLcalc2
dt
n1
C3 4 ¼  ; C21 ¼ C43 ¼ 1
n3

C13 ¼ C14 ¼ C22 ¼ C23 ¼ C24 ¼ C31 ¼ C32 ¼ C41 ¼ C42 ¼ C44 ¼ 0

The RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system’s first and
second rectangular spiral antenna are composed of a thin wire or a thin plate
element. Units are all in cm, and a1, a2 are radiuses of the first and second wires in
cm. There inductances can be calculated by the following formulas:

l0 X
4
l X
4
Lcalc1 ¼ ð Xk1  X3 Þ  Nc1
P1
; Lcalc2 ¼ 0  ð Xk2  X3 Þ  Nc2
P2
p k¼1;k6¼3 p k¼1;k6¼3

Due to electromagnetic interferences there are different in time delays respect to


first and second rectangular spiral antennas voltages and voltages derivatives. The
delayed voltages are V1(t − s1) and V2(t − s2) respectively (s1 6¼ s2) and delayed
voltages derivatives are dV1(t − D1)/dt, dV2(t − D2)/dt respectively.

ðD1 6¼ D2 ; s1  0; s2  0; D1 ; D2  0Þ; V1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 ¼ VLcalc1 ðtÞ;


V2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 ¼ VLcalc2 ðtÞ
VLcalc1 ðtÞ ! VLcalc1 ðt  s1 Þ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ ! VLcalc2 ðt  s2 Þ;
X1 ðtÞ ! X1 ðt  D1 Þ; X2 ðtÞ ! X2 ðt  D2 Þ

dV dV
We consider no delay effect on dX dt ; ; dt ; Ldt
Lcalc1 dX2
1
dt
calc2
. The RFID TAGs with
double rectangular spiral antenna system differential equations under electromag-
netic interferences (delays terms) influence only RFID first and second rectangular
spiral antenna voltages VLcalc1 ðtÞ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ and voltages derivatives X1 ðtÞ and X2 ðtÞ
dX1 ðtÞ dVLcalc1 ðtÞ dX2 ðtÞ dVLcalc2 ðtÞ
respect to time, there is no influence on dt ; dt ; dt ; dt .
0 1
dX1 0 1 0 X ðt  D Þ 1
dt
B dVLcalc1 C C11 . . . C14 1 1
B dt C B .. .. .. C B B VLcalc1 ðt  s1 Þ C
C
B dX2 C¼@ . . . A  @ X2 ðt  D2 Þ A
@ dt A
dVLcalc2 C41    C44 VLcalc2 ðt  s2 Þ
dt
826 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

To find equilibrium points (fixed points) of the RFID TAGs with double rect-
angular spiral antenna system is by

lim VLcalc1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ VLcalc1 ðtÞ; lim VLcalc2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ VLcalc2 ðtÞ


t!1 t!1
lim X1 ðt  D1 Þ ¼ lim X1 ðtÞ; lim X2 ðt  D2 Þ ¼ lim X2 ðtÞ
t!1 t!1 t!1 t!1
dX1 ðtÞ dVLcalc1 ðtÞ dX2 ðtÞ dVLcalc2 ðtÞ
¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; t  s1 ; t  s2 ; t  D1 ; t  D2
dt dt dt dt

ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ


We get four equations and the only fixed point is Eð0Þ ðX1 ; VLcalc1 ; X2 ; VLcalc2 Þ
ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ
E ð0Þ ðX1 ; VLcalc1 ; X2 ; VLcalc2 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0Þ, and since

g3 6¼ 0 & g2 6¼ 0 ) C11 6¼ 0; n3 ¼6 0 & n1 6¼ 0 ) C34 6¼ 0; g3 6¼ 0 & g1 6¼ 0 ) C12


6¼ 0; n3 6¼ 0 & n2 6¼ 0 ) C33 ¼6 0

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system
consists in adding to coordinates ½X1 VLcalc1 X2 VLcalc2 arbitrarily small increments of
exponential ½x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2  ekt , and retaining the first order terms in
X1 VLcalc1 X2 VLcalc2 . The system of four homogeneous equations leads to a polyno-
mial characteristics equation in the eigenvalues k. The polynomial characteristics
equations accept by set the below voltages and voltages derivative respect to time
into two RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system equations.
RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2  ekt are: i = 0
(first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X1 ðtÞ ¼ X1 þ x1  ekt ; VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x2  ekt ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ekt

We choose the above expressions for our X1 ðtÞ; VLcalc1 ðtÞ and X2 ðtÞ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ as
small displacement ½x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2 from the system fixed points at time t = 0.

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X1 þ x1 ; VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X2 þ x2 ; VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2

For k\0; t [ 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k [ 0; t [ 0 is


Unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for
k\0; t [ 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is
the eigenvalue parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or Unstable,
additionally his absolute value (jkj) establish the speed of flow toward or away from
the selected fixed point (Table 8.2).
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 827

Table 8.2 RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas variables for different k and t
values
k<0 k>0
t=0 ðiÞ ðiÞ
X1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X1 þ x1 X1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X1 þ x1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X2 þ x2 X2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X2 þ x2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
t>0 X1 ðtÞ ¼ X1 þ x1  ejkjt X1 ðtÞ ¼ X1 þ x1  ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ejkjt VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x1  ejkjt X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x1  ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ejkjt VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ejkjt
ðiÞ
t>0 X1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ X1 X1 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  x1  ejkjt
t!∞
VLcalc1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ VLcalc1
ðiÞ VLcalc1 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  vLcalc1  ejkjt

X2 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ X2
ðiÞ X2 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  x2  ejkjt

VLcalc2 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ VLcalc2
ðiÞ VLcalc2 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ  vLcalc2  ejkjt

The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for RFID TAGs
with double rectangular spiral antenna system voltages and voltages derivatives
respect to time are as follow:
h i
ðiÞ ðiÞ
dX1 ðtÞ X1 ðt þ DtÞ  X1 ðtÞ X1 þ x1  ekðt þ DtÞ  X1 þ x1  ekt
¼ lim ¼ lim
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
 
x1  ekt  ekDt  1 ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ lim ! k  x1  ekt
Dt!0 Dt

dVLcalc1 ðtÞ dVLcalc2 ðtÞ dX2 ðtÞ


¼ k  vLcalc1  ekt ; ¼ k  vLcalc2  ekt ; ¼ k  x2  ekt
dt dt dt

First we take the RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system
dV dV
voltages VLcalc1 ; VLcalc2 differential equations: X1 ¼ Ldt calc1
; X2 ¼ Ldt
calc2
and add-
ing coordinates ½X1 VLcalc1 X2 VLcalc2 arbitrarily small increments of exponential
terms ½x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2  ekt and retaining the first order terms in x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2 .

ðiÞ ði¼0Þ
k  vLcalc1  ekt ¼ X1 þ x1  ekt ; X1 ¼ 0 ) k  vLcalc1 þ x1 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ði¼0Þ
k  vLcalc2  e kt
¼ X2 þ x2  e kt
; X2 ¼ 0 ) k  vLcalc2 þ x2 ¼ 0

Second we take the RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system’s
voltages derivatives X1 ; X2 differential equations:
828 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

dX1 dX2
¼ C12  VLcalc1 þ C11  X1 ; ¼ C34  VLcalc2 þ C33  X2
dt dt

Adding coordinates ½X1 VLcalc1 X2 VLcalc2 arbitrarily small increments of expo-


nential terms ½x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2  ekt and retaining the first order terms in
x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2 .

ðiÞ ðiÞ
k  x1  ekt ¼ C12  ½VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ekt þ C11  ½X1 þ x1  ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
k  x1  ekt ¼ C12  VLcalc1 þ C11  X1 þ C12  vLcalc1  ekt þ C11  x1  ekt

ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed points C12  VLcalc1 þ C11  X1 ¼ 0

ðiÞ ðiÞ
C12  VLcalc1 þ C11  X1 ¼ 0 ) k  x1 þ C11  x1 þ C12  vLcalc1 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
k  x2  ekt ¼ C34  VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ekt þ C33  ½X2 þ x2  ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
k  x2  ekt ¼ C34  VLcalc2 þ C33  X2 þ C34  vLcalc2  ekt þ C33  x2  ekt

ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed points C34  VLcalc2 þ C33  X2 ¼ 0

ðiÞ ðiÞ
C34  VLcalc2 þ C33  X2 ¼ 0 ) k  x2 þ C33  x2 þ C34  vLcalc2 ¼ 0

Double rectangular spiral coils system arbitrarily small increments equations:

 k  vLcalc1 þ x1 ¼ 0; k  vLcalc2 þ x2 ¼ 0; k  x1 þ C11  x1 þ C12  vLcalc1 ¼ 0


 k  x2 þ C33  x2 þ C34  vLcalc2 ¼ 0

We define the following expressions:

ðiÞ ðiÞ
X1 ðt  D1 Þ ¼ X1 þ x1  ekðtD1 Þ ; VLcalc1 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1  ekðts1 Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðt  D2 Þ ¼ X2 þ x2  ekðtD2 Þ ; VLcalc2 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2  ekðts2 Þ

Then we get four delayed differential equations respect to coordinates


½X1 VLcalc1 X2 VLcalc2 arbitrarily small increments of exponential
½x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2  ekt .

k  ekt  x1 ¼ C11  ekðtD1 Þ  x1 þ C12  ekðts1 Þ  vLcalc1 ; k  ekt  vLcalc1 ¼ ekðtD1 Þ  x1


k  ekt  x2 ¼ C33  ekðtD2 Þ  x2 þ C34  ekðts2 Þ  vLcalc2 ; k  ekt  vLcalc2 ¼ ekðtD2 Þ  x2

ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ


In the equilibrium fixed point X1 ¼ 0; VLcalc1 ¼ 0; X2 ¼ 0; VLcalc2 ¼ 0.
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 829

The small increments Jacobian of our RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral
antenna system is as bellow:

!11 ¼ k þ C11  ekD1 ; !12 ¼ C12  eks1 ; !13 ¼ 0; !14 ¼ 0; !21 ¼ ekD1 ;
!22 ¼ k; !23 ¼ 0; !24 ¼ 0
!31 ¼ 0; !32 ¼ 0; !33 ¼ k þ C33  ekD2 ; !34 ¼ C34  eks2 ;
!41 ¼ 0; !42 ¼ 0; !43 ¼ ekD2 ; !44 ¼ k
0 1
0 1 x1 0 1
!11 . . . !14 B C !11 ... !14
B . C B vLcalc1 C B .
B . . .
.. C B C .. .. C
@ . .. AB C ¼ 0; A  k  I ¼ B@ .. .
C
. A; det jA  k  Ij ¼ 0
B x1 C
@ A
!41    !44 !41  !44
vLcalc2
P
2 P2
k½ si þ Dj
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k4 þ C12  C34  e i¼1 j¼1

P
2 P
2
k½s2 þ Dj k½s1 þ Dj
þ k  fC11  C34  e j¼1
þ C33  C12  e j¼1
g
P
2
k Dj
kðD2 þ s2 Þ kðD1 þ s1 Þ
þ k  fC34  e
2
 C12  e þ C11  C33  e j¼1
g
 k3  fC33  ekD2 þ C11  ekD1 g

We have three stability cases: s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s & D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 Or s1 ¼ s2 ¼


0 & D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D or s1 ¼ s2 ¼ D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD otherwise s1 6¼ s2 & D1 6¼ D2 and
they are positive parameters. There are other possible simple stability cases:

s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0
s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D; D2 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ D

We need to get characteristics equations for all above stability analysis cases. We
study the occurrence of any possible stability switching resulting from the increase
of value of the time delays s; D; sD for the general characteristic equation
Dðk; s=D=sD Þ. If we choose s parameter then Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks .
P
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ :Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ nk¼0 Pk ðsÞ  kk ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ
P2 ðsÞ  k þ P3 ðsÞ  k þ . . .. . .
2 3

Pm
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ
k¼0
q1 ðsÞ  k þ q2 ðsÞ  k2 þ . . .. . .
The case we analyze is when there is delay in RFID TAGs first and second
rectangular spiral antennas voltages (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s) and no delay in RFID TAGs first
and second rectangular spiral antennas voltages derivatives. The general charac-
teristic equation D(k, s) is as follow:
830 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k4  k3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ k2  C11  C33 þ fC12  C34  eks


þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33 Þ  k2  ðC34 þ C12 Þg  eks

Under Taylor series approximation: eks  1  k  s þ 12  k2  s2


The Maclaurin series is a Taylor series expansion of a eks function about zero
(0). We get the following general characteristic equation D(k, s) under Taylor series
approximation: eks  1  k  s þ 12  k2  s2 .

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11 þ k2  C11  C33 þ fC12  C34 þ k  ½C11  C34


1
þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s þ k2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g  eks
2
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 2; n [ m

Pn
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ: Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k¼0 Pk ðsÞ  k
k

X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ  k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ  k þ P2 ðsÞ  k þ P3 ðsÞ  k þ P4 ðsÞ  k
k 2 3 4

k¼0

¼ k  k3  ½C33 þ C11 þ k2  C11  C33


4

P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P2 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C33 ; P3 ðsÞ ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; P4 ðsÞ ¼ 1


Pm
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ: Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ k¼0
qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ  k
þ q2 ðsÞ  k2

X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ¼ C12  C34 þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33
k¼0
1
 C12  C34  s þ k2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 ; q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12  C34
2
1
q1 ðsÞ ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s; q2 ðsÞ ¼  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2

The homogeneous system for X1 VLcalc1 X2 VLcalc2 leads to a characteristic equa-


tion for the eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼

P
4 P
2
aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j and the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R
j¼0 j¼0
depend on qi ; qk and delay s, qi ; qk are any double rectangular spiral coils antennas
system’s parameters, other parameters keep as a constant [5, 6].
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 831

a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ C11  C33 ; a3 ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; a4 ¼ 1


c0 ¼ C12  C34 ; c1 ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s;
1
c2 ¼  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2

The designation of the variation arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will subsequently be omitted


from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions
of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ ,
i.e. k = 0 is not a Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ  eks ¼ 0. We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and
Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That is for any real number x:

pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ
¼ x4 þ i  x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ  x2  C11  C33
Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C34 þ i  x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
1
 x2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2
pn ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i  x; sÞ
1
¼ x4  x2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 þ C11  C33
2
þ C12  C34 þ i  x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ
þ i  x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 6¼ 0

jPði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  fðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  C11  C33 g þ x4  C211  C233


jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ C212  C234 þ x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 2
1
 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g
2
4 1
þ x  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2
2

We need to find the expression for Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  fðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  C11  C33 g


1
þ x4  fC211  C233  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2 g
2
 x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 2
1
 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g  C212  C234
2
832 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

We define the following parameters for simplicity:

N0 ¼ C212  C234 ; N2 ¼ ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 2


1
þ 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2
1
N4 ¼ C11  C33  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2 ;
2 2
2
N6 ¼ ðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  C11  C33 ; N8 ¼ 1

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2


X
4
¼ N0 þ N2  x2 þ N4  x4 þ N6  x6 þ N8  x8 ¼ N2k  x2k
k¼0

P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 N2k  x
2k
¼ 0 and its roots are given by
solving the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  C11  C33

PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ; QR ði  x; sÞ
1
¼ C12  C34  x2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s

Hence

PR ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  x; sÞj2
PR ði  x; sÞ  QR ði  x; sÞ þ PI ði  x; sÞ  QI ði  x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  x; sÞj2

fx4  x2  C11  C33 g  x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s


þ x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ  fC12  C34  x2  ½12  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g
sin hðsÞ ¼
C212  C234 þ x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 2
2  C12  C34  ½12  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g þ x4  ½12  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2

fx4  x2  C11  C33 g  fC12  C34  x2  ½12  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g
þ x4  ðC33 þ C11 Þ  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
cos hðsÞ ¼  2
C12  C234 þ x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 2  2  C12  C34
½12  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g þ x4  ½12  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 833

These are continuous and differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use
Theorem 1.2 and this prove the Theorem 1.3.
Our RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral system for x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2 leads
to a characteristic equation for the eigenvalue k having the form
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0; The case s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0.

Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4  k3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ k2  C11  C33


þ fC12  C34  eks þ k  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33 Þ  k2  ðC34 þ C12 Þg  eks

Under Taylor series approximation: eks  1  k  s þ 12  k2  s2 . The


Maclaurin series is a Taylor series expansion of a eks function about zero (0).
We get the following general characteristic equation D(k, s) under Taylor series
approximation: eks  1  k  s þ 12  k2  s2 .

Dðk; sÞ ¼ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11 þ k2  C11  C33


þ fC12  C34 þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
1
þ k2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g  eks
2

We use different parameters terminology from our last characteristics parameters


definition: k ! j; pk ðsÞ ! aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 2; n [ m
P
4 P
2
Additionally Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! QðkÞ then PðkÞ ¼ aj  k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj  k j
j¼0 j¼0

Pk ¼ k  k  ½C33 þ C11 þ k  C11  C33


4 3 2

1
Qk ¼ C12  C34 þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s þ k2  ½  C12  C34  s2
2
 C34  C12

n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m; aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R. They are continuous and differentiable


function of s such that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0. In the following “_” denotes complex and
conjugate. Functions PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s.
The coefficients: faj ðC1 ; R1 ; double rectangular spiral antennas parametrsÞ and
cj ðC1 ; R1 ; s; double rectangular spiral antennas parametrsÞg 2 R depend on RFID
TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas system’s C1, R1,s values and
antennas parameters.

a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ C11  C33 ; a3 ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; a4 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ C12  C34 ;


c1 ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
1
c2 ¼  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2
834 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the variation arguments.


ðR1 ; C1 ; s; double rectangular spiral antennas parametrs) will subsequently be omit-
ted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, differentiable functions of
their arguments and direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; C12  C34 6¼ 0.

g1  n1 ½Lcalc1
1
þ ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
R1 Lcalc1  ½Lcalc2 þ
1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
R1 Lcalc2
¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 6¼ 0
g3  n3 C2  ½1 þ Lcalc2 þ 2  K  Lcalc2  ½1 þ Lcalc1 þ 2  K  Lcalc1
1 Lcalc1 Lcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2

8 C1 ; double rectangular spiral antennas parametrs 2 R þ i.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root


of characteristic equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic function of k for
which the following requirements of the analysis (see kuang 1993, Sect. 3.4) can
also be verified in the present case.
(a) If k ¼ i  x, x 2 R then Pði  xÞ þ Qði  xÞ 6¼ 0, i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire (R1, C1,
double rectangular spiral antennas parameters) domain of interest.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek  0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
Indeed, in the limit

fC12  C34 þ k  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s


QðkÞ þ k2  12  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g
j j¼j j
PðkÞ k4  k3  ½C33 þ C11 þ k2  C11  C33

(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  fðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  C11  C33 g


1
þ x4  fC211  C233  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2 g
2
 x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 2
1
 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g  C212  C234
2

Has at most a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x (degree


in x8 ).
(d) Each positive root x(R1,C1,s, double rectangular spiral antennas parameters)
of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable with respect to R1 ; C1 ; s; double
rectangular spiral antennas parameters. This condition can only be assessed
numerically.
In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have
Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ thus k ¼ i  x, x [ 0 may be on
eigenvalue of characteristic equation. The analysis consists in identifying the roots
of characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane,
where by increasing the parameters R1 ; C1 ; s; double rectangular spiral antennas
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 835

parameters, Rek may, at the crossing Change its sign from (−) to (+), i.e. from a
ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ
stable focus Eð0Þ ðX1 ; VLcalc1 ; X2 ; VLcalc2 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0Þ to an unstable one, or vice
versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial
derivatives with respect to C1 ; R1 ; s and double rectangular spiral coils antennas
parameters [2, 3].

@Rek
^1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; R1 ; s; double rectangular spiral antennas parametrs ¼ const
@C1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðR1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; s; double rectangular spiral antennas parametrs ¼ const
@R1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðLcalc1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; s ¼ const
@Lcalc1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðLcalc2 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; s ¼ const
@Lcalc2 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; double rectangular spiral antennas parametrs
@s k¼ix
¼ const where x 2 R þ :

For the case s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s & D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 we get the following results:

PR ði  x; sÞ ¼ x4  x2  C11  C33 ; PI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x3  ðC33 þ C11 Þ


1
QR ði  x; sÞ ¼ C12  C34  x2  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 ;
2
QI ði  x; sÞ ¼ x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
N0 ¼ C212  C234 ; N2 ¼ ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 2
1
þ 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2
1
N4 ¼ C211  C233  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2 ;
2
2
N6 ¼ ðC33 þ C11 Þ  2  C11  C33 ; N8 ¼ 1
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ N0 þ N2  x2 þ N4  x4 þ N6  x6
X
4
þ N8  x8 ¼ N2k  x2k
k¼0

P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 N2k  x
2k
¼ 0 when writing PðkÞ ¼
PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼ i  x into double
rectangular spiral coils antennas system’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the
following:
836 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin x  s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos x  s ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

Where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, ðg; hÞ 2 R.


Furthermore, it follows above sin x  s and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and
adding the sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2  jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note: FðxÞ is dependent of s. Now it is important to notice that if s 62 I(assume that
I
R þ 0 is the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for s 62 I, xðsÞ is not
define. Then for all s in I xðsÞ is satisfies that Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0). Then there are no
positive xðsÞ solutions for Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have stability switches. For
any s 2 I, where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, we can define the angle
hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2  p as the solution of the below equations:

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2
PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
þ n2p
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ ; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; R1 ; C1 and RFID TAGs with double rectangular
spiral antennas parameters (Aavg1 ; Bavg2 ; A01 ; B02 ; Nc1 ; Nc2 ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .) indicate the
corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on, ^ðxÞ remember in
kðAavg1 ; Bavg2 ; A01 ; B02 ; Nc1 ; Nc2 ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ; xðAavg1 ; Bavg2 ; A01 ; B02 ; Nc1 ; Nc2 ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ,
and keeping all parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation closely follows that
in reference [BK]. Differentiating RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral
antennas characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific
parameter (x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark: x ¼ Aavg1 ; Bavg2 ; A01 ; B02 ; Nc1 ; Nc2 ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .

@k 1 Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ


ð Þ ¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ

Where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i  x, and bearing Pði  xÞ ¼
Pði  xÞ, Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ and i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼
Qx ði  xÞ that on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 837

@k 1 i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  x; xÞj2


ð Þjk¼ix ¼ ð Þ
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ;


Q ¼ QR þ i  QI

Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx

P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I . When (x) can be any RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral
antennas parameters R1, C1, And time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we have
dropped the arguments ði  x; xÞ, and where

Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ ; Fx


¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ

xx ¼ Fx =Fx . We define U and V:

U ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ;


V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ

We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = s.

PRx ¼ 2  x  ½2  x2  C11  C33 ; PIx ¼ 3  x2  ðC33 þ C11 Þ;


PRs ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0;
QRs ¼ x2  C12  C34  s; QIs ¼ x  C12  C34
PRx  PR ¼ 2  x3  ½2  x4  3  x2  C11  C33 þ C211  C233 ;
PIx  PI ¼ 3  x5  ðC33 þ C11 Þ2 ; xs ¼ Fs =Fx
PIx  PI ¼ 3  x5  ðC33 þ C11 Þ2 ; xs ¼ Fs =Fx ;
1
QRx ¼ 2  x  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12
2
QIx ¼ C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s;
QIx  QI ¼ x  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 2
1
QRx  QR ¼ 2  x  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12  ½C12  C34  x2
2
1
 ð  C12  C34  s  C34  C12 Þ
2
2
838 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Fs ¼ 2  ½ðPRs  PR þ PIs  PI Þ  ðQRs  QR þ QIs  QI Þ ;


PR  PIx ¼ 3  x4  ðx2  C11  C33 Þ  ðC33 þ C11 Þ
1
Fs ¼ 2  x2  C12  C34  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  s  x2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 Þ
2

PI  PRx ¼ 2  x4  ðC33 þ C11 Þ  ð2  x2  C11  C33 Þ; V ¼ ðPR  PIs  PI  PRs Þ


 ðQR  QIs  QI  QRs Þ
1
QR  QIx ¼ ½C12  C34  x2  ð  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 Þ
2
 ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s
QI  QRx ¼ 2  x2  ðC11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  sÞ
1
 ð  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 Þ
2
PR  PIs ¼ 0; PI  PRs ¼ 0; QR  QIs ¼ x  C12  C34  ½C12  C34  x2
1
 ð  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 Þ
2
QI  QRs ¼ x3  C12  C34  s  ½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s ; Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0

Differentiating with respect to s and we get Fx  @x @x


@s þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) @s ¼  Fx
Fs

@Rek 2  ½U þ s  jPj2 þ i  Fx @x Fs
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g; ¼ xs ¼ 
@s Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj 2 @s F x
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g; signf^1 ðsÞg
@s k¼ix
@x U  @x
@s þ V
¼ signfFx g  signfs  þxþ g
@s jPj2

We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcations)


in a RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas system, about the equi-
ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ
librium point Eð0Þ ðX1 ; VLcalc1 ; X2 ; VLcalc2 Þ as a result of a variation of delay
parameter s. The analysis consists in identifying the roots of our system charac-
teristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane where by
increasing the delay parameter s, Re k may at the crossing, change its sign from −
to +, i.e. from a stable focus E(*) to an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature may
be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with respect to s,
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re
@s Þk¼ix
k

@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; RFID TAGs with double rectangular
@s k¼ix
spiral antennas parameters ¼ const where x 2 R þ :
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 839

For our stability switching analysis we choose each of our system’s rectangular
spiral antenna on a substrate, width is 300 lm and lr = 450. The antenna is
constructed from silver ointment which his resistance is bigger than pure silver by
50 %. Track width is 20 lm, gap between tracks 20 lm, track depth is 20 lm up 10
100 lm. The requested rectangular spiral antenna inductance is 2.66 mH and
parasitic resistance less than 10 X. We need to find the possible number of rect-
angular spiral antenna’s turns (Nc1 and Nc2 for the first and second rectangular
spiral antenna respectively). Since each RFID antenna substrate permeability is 450
(lr = 450), our RFID antennas permeability is an average value between air per-
meability and magnet. We consider that the TAGs permeability is 100–300 (lr) and
possible TAGs dimension: 5 mm  5 mm, 6 mm  6 mm, 7 mm  7 mm, 8 mm 
8 mm and permeability 100, 200, 300 (lr). Tables 8.3, 8.4, and 8.5 describes the
analysis for l = lr ∙ l0 (lr = 100, 200, 300). Table 8.3 is for l = lr ∙ l0; lr = 100; l
= 125.66 ∙ (1e−6) H/m. Table 8.4 is for l = lr ∙ l0; lr = 200; l = 251.32 ∙ (1e−6)
H/m and Table 8.5 is for l = lr ∙ l0; lr = 300; l = 376.98 ∙ (1e−6) H/m.
Results: The most close inductance analysis to 2.66 mH is 2.7 mH and subcases.
Result Table 8.3: Lcalc = 2.7 mH, Nc = 60, (A0 = 7 mm)  (B0 = 7 mm); l = lr
∙ l0; lr = 100; l = 125.66 ∙ (1e−6) H/m. The DC resistance of rectangular spiral
RFID antenna: RDC ¼ rS LT
¼ rpa
LT
2 . LT—total length of the wire. r—Conductivity of

the wire (ʊ/m). S—Cross section area p  a2 . a—radius of the wire.

LT LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼ ; RDC ¼
r  S r  p  a2 r  p  a2
2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3 g
¼
r  p  a2

Table 8.3 Rectangular spiral antenna Lcalc as a function of different number of turns for (Nc) for l
= lr ∙ l0; lr = 100; l = 125.66∙(1e−6) H/m
Nc Lcalc (5 mm  5 Lcalc (6 mm  6 Lcalc (7 mm  7 Lcalc (8 mm  8
mm)—[H] mm)—[H] mm)—[H] mm)—[H]
10 1.08  10−4 1.37  10−4 1.67  10−4 1.98  10−4
20 3.383  10−4 4.38  10−4 5.419  10−4 6.48  10−4
30 6.212  10−4 8.25  10−4 0.001 0.0013
60 0.0014 0.002 0.0027 = 2.7 mH 0.0035
100 0.001 0.0024 0.0041 0.0058
150 −0.0014 NaN 0.0021 0.0051
120 1.3598  10−4 0.0018 0.0038 0.0061
170 −0.0040 −0.0012 2.5454  10−4 0.0033
200 −0.0106 −0.0062 −0.0023 NaN
220 −0.0171 −0.0115 −0.0063 −0.0020
250 −0.0306 −0.023 −0.0158 −0.0092
840 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Table 8.4 Rectangular spiral antenna Lcalc as a function of different number of turns for (Nc) for l
= lr ∙ l0; lr = 200; l = 251.32 ∙ (1e−6)H/m
Nc Lcalc (5 mm  Lcalc (6 mm  Lcalc (7 mm  Lcalc (8 mm 
5 mm)—[H] 6 mm)—[H] 7 mm)—[H] 8 mm)—[H]
10 2.17  10−4 2.75  10−4 3.35  10−4 3.97  10−4
20 6.767  10−4 8.76  10−4 0.0011 0.0013
30 0.0012 0.001 0.0021 0.0025
60 0.0027 = 2.7 mH 0.004 0.0055 0.0069
100 0.0020 0.0049 0.0081 0.0116
150 −0.0028 NaN 0.0042 0.0102
120 2.719  10−4 0.0035 0.0077 0.0122
170 −0.008 −0.0025 5.09  10−4 0.0066
200 −0.0212 −0.0123 −0.0046 NaN
220 −0.0342 −0.0229 −0.0127 −0.0039
250 −0.0612 −0.046 −0.0316 −0.0184

Table 8.5 Rectangular spiral antenna Lcalc as a function of different number of turns for (Nc) for l
= lr ∙ l0; lr = 300; l = 376.98 ∙ (1e−6)H/m
Nc Lcalc (5 mm  Lcalc (6 mm  Lcalc (7 mm  Lcalc (8 mm 
5 mm)—[H] 6 mm)—[H] 7 mm)—[H] 8 mm)—[H]
10 3.25  10−4 4.13  10−4 5.03  10−4 5.95  10−4
20 0.001 0.0013 0.0016 0.0019
30 0.0019 0.0025 0.0031 0.0038
60 0.0041 0.0061 0.0082 0.0104
100 0.003 0.0073 0.0122 0.0173
150 −0.004 NaN 0.0062 0.0153
120 4.079  10−4 0.0053 0.0115 0.0183
170 −0.0119 −0.0037 7.63  10−4 0.0099
200 −0.0317 −0.0185 −0.0069 NaN
220 −0.0513 −0.0344 −0.0190 −0.0059
250 −0.0918 −0.069 −0.0474 −0.0276

A0 þ B0 ¼ 0:014 m ; Nc ¼ 60; w þ g ¼ 40  106 ) LT ¼ 1:689 m. Cross sec-


tion area S ¼ 20 lm  20 lm ¼ 400  1012  m2 . Conductivity of silver
r ¼ 6:1  107 ðf=mÞ. Conductivity has SI units of Siemens per meter
(S/m).rsilver @ 20 C ¼ 6:3  107 ðS/mÞ.
The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 Ω. S ¼ 20 lm  x.

1:689
\10 ) x [ 1:3405  104 m ¼ 134:05 lm;
6:3  107  20  106  x
RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 67 X
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 841

Actually the track is a mixture of silver then the conductivity is half of silver
conductivity.

rsilver @ 20 C 6:3  107 ðS/mÞ


¼ ¼ 3:15  107 ðS/mÞ:
2 2
1:6890
\10 ) x [ 2:681  104 m ¼ 268:1 lm;
3:15  107  20  106  x
RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 134 X

Result Table 8.4: Lcalc = 2.7 mH, Nc = 60, (A0 = 5 mm)  (B0 = 5 mm); l = lr
∙ l0; lr = 200; l = 251.32 ∙ (1e−6) H/m. The DC resistance of rectangular spiral
RFID antenna: RDC ¼ rSLT
¼ rpa
LT
2 . LT—total length of the wire. r—conductivity of

the wire (ʊ/m). S—Cross section area p  a2 . a—radius of the wire.

LT LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼ ; RDC ¼
r  S r  p  a2 r  p  a2
2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3 g
¼
r  p  a2

A0 þ B0 ¼ 0:01 m ; Nc ¼ 60 ; w þ g ¼ 40  106 ) LT ¼ 1:201 m

Cross section area S ¼ 20 lm  20 lm ¼ 400  1012 m2 . Conductivity of Silver


r ¼ 6:1  107 ðf=mÞ. Conductivity has SI units of siemens per meter (S/m).
rsilver @ 20 C ¼ 6:3  107 ðS/mÞ. The track depth (x) does not influence our total
inductance, and then we can take it as a variable and find his minimum value for
RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm  x.

1:201
\10 ) x [ 9:5317  105 m ¼ 95:317 lm;
6:3  107  20  106  x
RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 47:65 X

Actually the track is a mixture of silver then the conductivity is half of silver
conductivity.

rsilver @ 20 C 6:3  107 ðS/mÞ


¼ ¼ 3:15  107 ðS/mÞ:
2 2
1:201
\10 ) x [ 19:06  105 m ¼ 190:6 lm;
3:15  107  20  106  x
RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 95:30 X

Follows 8.3 and 8.4 tables results we choose for Lcalc-1 = 2.7 mH
842 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Rdc1 ¼ 134 X; Lcalc-2 = 2.7 mH; Rdc2 ¼ 95:30 X. Typical other values for
our system R1 = 100 kX, C1 = 23 pF, K = 0.6 (RFID IC is represented as parallel
circuit of capacitor C1 and R1). g1 ¼ 371:21; g2 ¼ 3:395  105 ; g3 ¼ 7:36  1011

n1 ¼ 371:21; n2 ¼ 3:395  105 ; n3 ¼ 7:36  1011 ; C21 ¼ C43 ¼ 1


3:395  105 371:21
C11 ¼  ¼ 4:6128  105 ; C12 ¼  ¼ 5:0436  1012
7:36  1011 7:36  1011
3:395  105 371:21
C33 ¼ ¼ 4:6128  105 ; C34 ¼  ¼ 5:0436  1012
7:36  1011 7:36  1011
C13 ¼ C14 ¼ C22 ¼ C23 ¼ C24 ¼ C31 ¼ C32 ¼ C41 ¼ C42 ¼ C44 ¼ 0

Then we get the expression for Fðx; sÞ typical RFID TAGs with double rect-
angular spiral antenna parameters values.

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  fðC33 þ C11 Þ2  2  C11  C33 g


1
þ x4  fC211  C233  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 2 g
2
 x2  f½C11  C34 þ C12  C33  C12  C34  s 2
1
 2  C12  C34  ½  C12  C34  s2  C34  C12 g  C212  C234
2

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2


¼ x8 þ x6  f8:5112  1011  2  2:1278  1011 g
1
þ x4  f4:5275  1022  ½  2:5438  1025  s2
2
þ 5:0436  10 þ 5:0436  1012 2 g
12

 x2  f½2:3265  1018 þ 2:3265  1018  2:5438  1025  s 2


1
 2  2:5438  1025  ½  2:5438  1025  s2
2
þ 5:0436  1012 þ 5:0436  1012 g  6:4709  1050

We find those x, s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,


complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001. . .10 (s) and it
can be express by 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0.

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  4:2556  1011


þ x4  f4:5275  1022  ½1:2719  1025  s2 þ 1:0087  1013 2 g
 x2  f½4:653  1018  2:5438  1025  s 2
5:0876  1025  ½1:2719  1025  s2 þ 10:0872  1012 g  6:4709  1050

P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 N2k  x2k ¼ 0
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 843

Nj ! Phij (j = 0, 2, 4, 6, 8). Running MATLAB script for s values


(s 2 ½0:001. . .10 ). Phij(j = 1,3,5,7) = 0
MATLAB script: Tau = 0.001; Phi0 = -6.4709e50; Phi1 = 0; Phi2 =
(4.653e18-2.5438e25 * Tau).^2-5.0876e25 * (1.2719e25 * Tau * Tau +
10.0872e12); Phi3 = 0; Phi4 = 4.5275e22-(1.2719e25 * Tau * Tau + 1.0087e13).
^2; Phi5 = 0; Phi6 = 4.2556e11; Phi8 = 1; Phi7 = 0; p = [Phi8 Phi7 Phi6 Phi5 Phi4
Phi3 Phi2 Phi1 Phi0]; r = roots(p) (Tables 8.6, and 8.7).
We can summary our xi(s) results for xi(s) > 0 and real number (ignore com-
plex, negative and imaginary values). We exclude from our table (Table 8.12) the
high and real xi(s) values (1.0e+009*, 1.0e+010*, 1.0e+011*, …) and add results
for s = 15 s and s = 20 s (Table 8.12). Next figure describes the RFID TAGs with
double loop rectangular spiral antennas system, x as a function of delay parameter s
(case s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0) (Tables 8.8, 8.9, 8.10, 8.11, 8.14).
RFID TAGs with double loop rectangular spiral antennas system, x as a func-
tion of delay parameter s (Case s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0) (Fig. 8.5).

Table 8.6 RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas systemroots xi(s)
s s = 0.001 s s = 0.01 s s = 0.1 s
x1 1.0e+009* 1.0e+010* 1.0e+011*
x2 −3.5664 −3.5664 −3.5664
x3 −0.0000 + 3.5664i 0.0000 + 3.5664i −0.0000 + 3.5664i
x4 −0.0000 − 3.5664i 0.0000 − 3.5664i −0.0000 − 3.5664i
x5 3.5664 3.5664 3.5664
x6 −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x7 −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i
x8 0.0000 + 0.0000i -0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x9 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i

Table 8.7 RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas system roots xi(s)
s s=1s s=2s s=3s
x1 1.0e+012* 1.0e+012* 1.0e+013*
x2 −3.5664 −7.1327 −1.0699
x3 0 + 3.5664i −0.0000 + 7.1327i −0.0000 + 1.0699i
x4 0 − 3.5664i −0.0000 − 7.1327i −0.0000 − 1.0699i
x5 3.5664 7.1327 1.0699
x6 −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x7 -0.0000-0.0000i 0.0000-0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i
x8 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x9 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i
844 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Table 8.8 RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas system roots xi(s)
s s=4s s=5s s=6s
x1 1.0e+013* 1.0e+013* 1.0e+013*
x2 −1.4265 −1.7832 −2.1398
x3 0 + 1.4265i 0.0000 + 1.7832i 0 + 2.1398i
x4 0 − 1.4265i 0.0000 − 1.7832i 0 − 2.1398i
x5 1.4265 1.7832 2.1398
x6 −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x7 −0.0000− 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i
x8 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x9 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i

Table 8.9 RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas system roots xi(s)
s s=7s s=8s s=9s
x1 1.0e+013* 1.0e+013* 1.0e+013*
x2 −2.4965 −2.8531 −3.2097
x3 0.0000 + 2.4965i −0.0000 + 2.8531i −0.0000 + 3.2097i
x4 0.0000 − 2.4965i −0.0000 − 2.8531i −0.0000 − 3.2097i
x5 2.4965 2.8531 3.2097
x6 −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x7 −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i
x8 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x9 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i

Table 8.10 RFID TAGs with s s=0s s = 10 s


double rectangular spiral
antennas system roots xi(s) x1 1.0e+006* 1.0e+013*
x2 −3.4542 −3.5664
x3 3.4542 −0.0000 + 3.5664i
x4 0.0000 + 2.6095i −0.0000 − 3.5664i
x5 0.0000−2.6095i 3.5664
x6 −0.1553 + 1.6727i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x7 −0.1553 − 1.6727i −0.0000 − 0.0000i
x8 0.1553 + 1.6727i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x9 0.1553 - 1.6727i 0.0000 − 0.0000i
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 845

Table 8.11 RFID TAGs with s s = 15 s s = 20 s


double rectangular spiral
antennas system roots xi(s) x1 1.0e+013* 1.0e+013*
x2 −5.3496 −7.1327
x3 0 + 5.3496i 0.0000 + 7.1327i
x4 0 − 5.3496i 0.0000 − 7.1327i
x5 5.3496 7.1327
x6 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x7 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i
x8 −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x9 −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i

Table 8.12 RFID TAGs with s(s) x sin(x ∙ s) cos(x ∙ s)


double rectangular spiral
antennas system positive and 0 3.4542 −1.43e−018 −9.98e−014
real roots xi(s) values and sin 0.001…1 3.5664
(x ∙ s), cos(x ∙ s) values 2 7.1327 −5.86e−016 4.14e−015
3 1.0699 −1.11e−015 1.44e−015
4 1.4265 −3.65e−016 9.77e−016
5 1.7832 −1.50e−016 6.51e−016
6 2.1398 −7.23e−017 4.59e−016
7 2.4965 −3.90e−017 3.39e−016
8 2.8531 −2.29e−017 2.60e−016
9 3.2097 −1.42e−017 2.06e−016
10 3.5664 −9.37e−018 1.67e−016
15 5.3496 −1.85e−018 7.43e−017
20 7.1327 −5.85e−019 4.18e−017
Hint: e − x = 10−x

MATLAB script: plot([0 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20], [3.4542


3.5664 3.5664 3.5664 3.5664 7.1327 1.0699 1.4265 1.7832 2.1398 2.4965 2.8531
3.2097 3.5664 5.3496 7.1327], ‘-or’).
RFID TAGs with double loop rectangular spiral antennas system F(x,s) function
(Fig. 8.6).
MATLAB script:
[w,t] = meshgrid(1:0.1:8,0:0.1:20); f = w.^8 + w.^6 * 4.2556e11 + w.^4. *
(4.5275e22 − (1.2719e25. * t.^2 + 1.0087e13).^2) − w.^2. * ((4.653e18 −
2.5438e25. * t).^2 − 5.0876e25. * (1.2719e25. * t.^2 + 10.0872e12)) − 6.4709e50;
set(gcf, ‘renderer’, ‘painters’); meshc(f);%x ! w,s ! t.
P
Table 8.13 Single, two, and three turn rectangular planar coils L0, M+, M−, and M
846

Single turn rectangular planar coil (N = 4) Two turn rectangular planar coil (N = 8) Three turn rectangular planar coil (N = 12)
N
X 4
X 8
P 12
P
L0 ¼ Li Li ¼ L1 þ L2 Li Li
i¼1 i¼1
i¼1 i¼1
i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; N þ L3 þ L4
Mþ 0 2  ðM1;5 þ M2;6 2  ðM1;9 þ M1;5 þ M5;9
þ M3;7 þ M4;8 Þ þ M2;6 þ M2;10 þ M6;10
þ M3;7 þ M3;11 þ M11;7
þ M4;8 þ M4;12 þ M8;12 Þ
M 2  ðM1;3 þ M2;4 Þ 2  ðM1;7 þ M1;3 þ M5;7 2  ðM1;11 þ M1;7 þ M1;3
þ M5;3 þ M2;8 þ M2;4 þ M5;11 þ M5;7 þ M5;3
þ M6;8 þ M6;4 Þ þ M9;11 þ M9;7 þ M9;3
þ M2;12 þ M2;8 þ M2;4
þ M6;12 þ M6;8 þ M6;4
þ M10;12 þ M10;8 þ M10;4 Þ
P X
M M ¼ M 2  ðM1;5 þ M2;6 2  ðM1;9 þ M1;5 þ M5;9
¼ 2  ðM1;3 þ M2;4 Þ þ M3;7 þ M4;8 Þ þ M2;6 þ M2;10 þ M6;10
 2  ðM1;7 þ M1;3 þ M5;7 þ M3;7 þ M3;11 þ M11;7
þ M5;3 þ M2;8 þ M2;4 þ M4;8 þ M4;12 þ M8;12 Þ
þ M6;8 þ M6;4 Þ  2  ðM1;11 þ M1;7 þ M1;3
þ M5;11 þ M5;7 þ M5;3
þ M9;11 þ M9;7 þ M9;3
þ M2;12 þ M2;8 þ M2;4
þ M6;12 þ M6;8 þ M6;4
þ M10;12 þ M10;8 þ M10;4 Þ
8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 847

Table 8.14 Single, two turn, and three turn number of term contributing to M+ and M−
Rectangular planar N+: number of term contributing to M+ N−: number of terms
coil type (number of positive mutual inductance terms) contributing to M−
Single turn 0 4
rectangular planar
coil (n = 1, Zs = 4)
Two turn 8 16
rectangular planar
coil (n = 2, Zs = 8)
Three turn 24 36
rectangular planar
coil (n = 3,
Zs = 12)

Fig. 8.5 RFID TAGs with


double loop rectangular spiral
antenna system x as a
function of delay parameter s

Then we get the expression for Fðx; sÞ for typical RFID shifted gate parameters
values.

Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði  x; sÞj2  jQði  x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6  39:16  1010


þ x4  f383:17  1020  ½7:8  1024  s2 þ 7:9  1012 2 g
 x2  f½34:94  1017  15:6  1024  s 2
31:2  1024  ½7:8  1024  s2 þ 7:9  1012 g  243:39  1048

We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,


complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001. . .10 and we
can be express by 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. Since it is a very complex function
We recommend to solve it numerically rather than analytic.
848 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Fig. 8.6 RFID TAGs double rectangular spiral antennas F(x,s) function

We plot the stability switch diagram based on different delay values of our RFID
double rectangular spiral coils antennas system. Since it is a very complex function
we recommend to solve it numerically rather than analytic.

@Rek 2  ½U þ s  jPj2 þ i  Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@s Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2
@Rek 2  fFx  ðV þ x  P2 Þ  Fs  ðU þ s  P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4  ðV þ x  P2 Þ2

The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally when all double rectangular spiral coils
antennas system’s parameters are known and the stability switch due to various
time delay values s is describe in the following expression:

signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx ðxðsÞ; sÞg  signfs  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ xðsÞ


UðxðsÞÞ  xs ðxðsÞÞ þ VðxðsÞÞ
þ g
jPðxðsÞÞj2

Remark: we know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies it roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which xi are complex or imaginary
number, then unable to analyse stability [5, 6].
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 849

8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film


Inductors Antenna System Stability Optimization
Under Microstrip Delayed in Time

We have a system of single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna
(four segments). The system is constructed from four straight thin film inductors
which are connected in a single turn square structure. The straight thin film inductors
are connected by microstrip lines (A, B, and C). The single turn square planar
straight thin film inductors antenna system is connected to transceiver module
through two microstrip lines (D and E) [85]. Index (i) stands for the first (i = 1),
second (i = 2), third (i = 3), and fourth (i = 4) straight thin film inductors. wi is the
width of straight thin film inductor (i) in cm, zi is the thickness of straight thin film
inductor (i) in cm, and li is the length of straight thin film conductor (inductor) in cm.
The calculated inductance of straight thin film inductor (i) is as follow (Li is the
segment inductance in lH):

2  li w i þ zi
Li ¼ 0:002  li  fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g½lH ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4
wi þ zi 3  li

Remark: we assume that the magnetic permeability of the conductor material is 1


and the four straight thin film inductors are not identical wi 6¼ wj ; li 6¼ lj zi 6¼ zj
ðj 6¼ i; j ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4Þ (Fig. 8.7).
N-turn planar rectangular coil structure: If we have N-turn planar rectangular coil
structure the total inductance of this coil is equal to the sum of the self-inductance
P
of each of the straight segment ( Ni¼1 Li ; i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; N) plus all the mutual
inductances between the segments. The mutual inductance between segment (k) and
(j) has a component Mk,j caused by the current flowing in segment (k), and a
component Mj,k caused by the current flowing in segment (j). Since the frequency
and phase in both segments are identical, the total mutual inductance linking them
equals Mk;j þ Mj;k . An analogous relationship exists between segment pairs 2-6, 3-7,
4-8, etc., in each of these pairs, current flow is in the same direction in both
segments and all mutual inductances are positive. The mutual inductance between
segment 1 and 7, on the other hand, has a component M1,7 caused by the current in
segment 1, and a component M7,1 caused by the current in segment 7. It can be
implemented in the same manner to other segments. The total mutual inductance
linking these two segments equals M1;7 þ M7;1 but is negative because current flow
in segment 1 is opposite in direction to current flow in segment 7
(k ¼ 1; 2; . . .; N; j ¼ 1; 2; . . .; N; k 6¼ j; k; j 2 N þ ). An analogous relationship exists
between segment pairs 1-3, 5-7, 5-3, 2-8, 2-4, 6-8, and 6-4 (case of two-turn
rectangular planar coil). Current magnitude is identical in all segments, with the
result that Mj,k = Mk,j. The total inductance LT for the case of two turn coil is as
follow:
850 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Fig. 8.7 Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system

X
N ¼8
LT ¼ Li þ 2  ðM1;5 þ M2;6 þ M3;7 þ M4;8 Þ
i¼1
 2  ðM1;7 þ M1;3 þ M5;7 þ M5;3 þ M2;8 þ M2;4 þ M6;8 þ M6;4 Þ
P PN¼8
We define the mutual inductances term as M, (L0 ; L0 ¼ i¼1 Li ).
X
M ¼ 2  ðM1;5 þ M2;6 þ M3;7 þ M4;8 Þ
 2  ðM1;7 þ M1;3 þ M5;7 þ M5;3 þ M2;8 þ M2;4 þ M6;8 þ M6;4 Þ

Where LT is the totalPinductances, L0 is the sum of the self-inductances of all the


straight segments, and M is the sum of all the mutual inductances, both positive
and negative.
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 851

M þ ¼ 2  ðM1;5 þ M2;6 þ M3;7 þ M4;8 Þ; M


¼ 2  ðM1;7 þ M1;3 þ M5;7 þ M5;3 þ M2;8 þ M2;4 þ M6;8 þ M6;4 Þ
P
General case, N-turn planar rectangular coil structure LT ¼ Ni¼1 Li þ M þ 
M where M+ is the sum of the positive mutual inductances and M- is the sum of
the negative mutual inductances. The mutual inductance between two parallel
conductors is a function of the length of the conductors and of the geometric mean
distance between them. The figure and Table 8.13 describe single-turn rectangular
planar coil (N = 4), two-turn rectangular planar coil (n = 8), and three-turn rect-
angular planar coil (n = 12), sum of the self-inductances (L0), sum of the positive
mutual inductances (M+), sum of P the negative mutual inductances (M−) and the
sum of all the mutual inductances M (Table 8.15, Fig. 8.8).
We define (n) as the number of full turns and (Zs) as the total number of
segments. The number of term contributing to M+ is N+ and the number of terms
contributing to M− is N−.

N þ ¼ 4  n  ðn  1Þ þ 2  n  ðZs  4  nÞ
N ¼ 4  n4 þ 2  n  ðZs  4  nÞ þ ðZs  4  n  2Þ  ðZs  4  n  1Þ  ðZs  4  nÞ=3

Table 8.15 Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna equivalent circuit
VAi 8 i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; 14 expressions
Node voltage Expression
VA1 IRa  Ra
VA2 dIL0
IRa  Ra  La  dt
1

VA3 dIL0
IRa  Ra  ðLa þ L01 Þ  dt
1

VA4 ðVA4  VA5 Þ dIL0


IRa  Ra  ðLa þ L01 Þ  dt
1
 IL01  R1
VA5 dIL0
IRa  Ra  ðLa þ L01 Þ  dt
1
 IL01  R1
VA6 dIL0 dIL0 ðts1 Þ
IRa  Ra  ðLa þ L01 Þ  dt
1
 IL01  R1  L02  1
dt
VA7 ðVA7  VA8 Þ dIL0 dIL0 ðts1 Þ
IRa  Ra  ðLa þ L01 Þ  dt
1
 IL01  R1  L02  1
dt  IL01 ðt  s1 Þ  R2
VA8 dIL0 dIL0 ðts1 Þ
IRa  Ra  ðLa þ L01 Þ  dt
1
 IL01  R1  L02  1
dt  IL01 ðt  s1 Þ  R2
P3
VA9 dIL0 ðt sÞ
i¼1 i
P3 P2
IRb  Rb þ ðLb þ L04 Þ  1
dt þ IL01 ðt  i¼1 si Þ  R4 þ IL01 ðt  i¼1 si Þ  R3
P3
VA10 ðVA10  VA11 Þ dIL0 ðt sÞ
i¼1 i
P3
IRb  Rb þ ðLb þ L04 Þ  1
dt þ IL01 ðt  i¼1 si Þ  R4
P3
VA11 dIL0 ðt sÞ
i¼1 i
P3
IRb  Rb þ ðLb þ L04 Þ  1
dt þ IL01 ðt  i¼1 si Þ  R4
P3
VA12 dIL0 ðt sÞ
i¼1 i
IRb  Rb þ ðLb þ L04 Þ  1 dt
P3
VA13 dIL0 ðt sÞ
i¼1 i
IRb  Rb þ Lb  1
dt
VA14 IRb  Rb
852 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Fig. 8.8 Square planar straight thin film inductor antenna N=4, N=8, and N=12

Table 8.16 Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna equivalent circuit’s
remarks 1.0–1.6 expressions
Remark no. Expression
1.0 P3 P
3
d IL0 ðt
2
sÞ d 2 IL0 ðtÞ k si
i¼1 i
1
dt2 ¼ 1
dt2 e i¼1

1.1 Pi1 P
j1

P
4 d 2 IL0 ðt s Þ
k¼1 k
d 2 IL0 ðtÞ P
4 k sk
L01  1
dt2 ¼ 1
dt2  L0j  e k¼1

i¼2 j¼2

1.2 Pi1 P
j1

P
4
qi li
dIL0 ðt s Þ
k¼1 k
dIL0 ðtÞ P
4
qj lj
k sk
wi zi  ¼  wj zj  e
1 1 k¼1
dt dt
i¼2 j¼2

1.3 P3 P
3
dIL0 ðt sÞ dIL0 ðtÞ k si
i¼1 i
1
dt ¼ 1
dt e i¼1

1.4 P3 P
3
d 3 IL0 ðt sÞ d 3 IL0 ðtÞ k si
i¼1 i
1
dt3 ¼ 1
dt3 e i¼1

1.5 Pi1 P
j1

P
4 d 3 IL0 ðt s Þ
k¼1 k
d 3 IL0 ðtÞ P
4 k sk
L01  1
dt3 ¼ 1
dt3  L0j e k¼1

i¼2 j¼2

1.6 Pi1 P
j1

P
4
qi li
d 2 IL0 ðt s Þ
k¼1 k
d 2 IL0 ðtÞ P
4
qj lj
k sk
wi zi  1
dt2 ¼ 1
dt2  wj zj e k¼1

i¼2 j¼2

Mutual inductance between two parallel conductors (same length):


The mutual inductance Mj,k between two parallel conductors (j and k segments
lj ; lk ; j 6¼ k; lk ¼ lj ¼ l) is a function of the length of the conductors and of the
Geometric Mean Distance (GMD) between them (Mj;k ¼ 2  l  Q). Mj;k is the
mutual inductance in (nH), l is the conductor length in (cm), and Q is the mutual
inductance parameter, calculated from the equation (Fig. 8.9):
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l l2 ðGMDÞ2 GMD
Q ¼ lnf þ 1þ g  1 þ þ
GMD ðGMDÞ2 l2 l
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 853

Fig. 8.9 Two parallel conductors (same length)

In this equation, l is the length corresponding to the subscript of Q, and GMD is


the Geometric Mean Distance (GMD) between the two conductors (lj ; lk ), which is
approximately equal to the distance dj;k ðGMD ’ dj;k ¼ dÞ between the track cen-
ters. The exact value of the GMD may be calculated from the equation:

1 1 1 1
ln GMD ¼ ln dj;k  f d
þ d
þ d
þ d
12  ð wj;k Þ2 60  ð wj;k Þ4 168  ð wj;k Þ6 360  ð wj;k Þ8
1
þ d
þ . . .g
660  ð wj;k Þ10

where (w) is the track width wj ¼ wk ¼ w.

1 1 1 1
GMD ¼ exp½ln dj;k  f d
þ d
þ d
þ d
12  ð wj;k Þ2 60  ð wj;k Þ4 168  ð wj;k Þ6 360  ð wj;k Þ8
1
þ d
þ . . .g
660  ð wj;k Þ10

We can represent our single turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna system equivalent circuit. Microstrip lines (A, B, and C) are represented as
delay lines s1, s2, and s3 respectively. We neglect microstrip lines D and E parasitic
effects (no delays). The sum of all the mutual P
Inductances, both positive and negative is marked as (SigmaM ¼ M)
inductance. Transceiver module is represented as an equivalent circuit of mixer,
with input and output impedances of the mixer board. The mixer itself has a
common gate input. The input is dominated by parasitic impedances of the package
854 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

and PCB stray, such as shunt capacitance of the device gates along with the bond
wire inductances and resistance which is inversely proportional to the mixer current
setting. In similar way as for the inputs, the impedance at the outputs can be
modeled by a resistance with a shunt PCB stray capacitance and bond wires
inductances. The resistance Ri ¼ qAi li i of a straight thin film (strip) number
(i; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4) is expected to depend on the DC resistivity qi of the straight thin
film strip material and the strip cross section Ai ¼ wi  zi ; Ri ¼ wqii lzii . The dimension
of the straight thin film strip that affects the inductance most strongly is the length li .
The width wi has much weaker influence, and straight thin film strip thickness can
be neglected completely for the limit (zi  wi ). This is in contrast to the resistance
Ri ¼ wqii lzii , which is inversely proportional to the straight thin film strip cross section
wi  zi and depends on the material properties via its resistivity qi [85] (Fig. 8.10).
Inductance of a single turn square planar coil (straight thin film inductors sys-
tem) calculation:

2  li w i þ zi
Li ¼ 0:002  li  fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g½lH ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4
w i þ zi 3  li

Fig. 8.10 Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system equivalent circuit
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 855

2  l1 w1 þ z1
L1 ¼ 0:002  l1  fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g;
w1 þ z1 3  l1
2  l2 w2 þ z2
L2 ¼ 0:002  l2  fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g
w2 þ z2 3  l2
2  l3 w3 þ z3
L3 ¼ 0:002  l3  fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g;
w3 þ z3 3  l3
2  l4 w4 þ z4
L4 ¼ 0:002  l4  fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g
w4 þ z4 3  l4

The derivations are producing the following calculation results (Grover):

X
N ¼4 X X
N ¼4
LT ¼ Li þ M¼ Li þ M þ  M
i¼1 i¼1

Since the currents in parallel straight thin film segments flow in opposite
directions, there is no positive mutual inductance in this segment coil; that is
M þ ¼ 0. The negative mutual inductance is equal to the sum of M1;3 ; M3;1 and
M2;4 ; M4;2 Or, since M1;3 equals M3;1 and M2;4 equals M4;2 ,
M ¼ 2  ðM1;3 þ M2;4 Þ.

dj;k ; d1;3 ¼ d3;1 ; w1 ¼ w3 ¼ w13

1 1 1
GMD1;3 ¼ exp½ln d1;3  f d1;3 2
þ d1;3 4
þ d
1;3 6
þ
12  ðw13 Þ 60  ðw13 Þ 168  ðw13 Þ
1 1
d1;3 8
þ d
1;3 10
þ . . .g
360  ðw13 Þ 660  ðw13 Þ

This expression and that for l1 , when substitute into Q ¼ . . ., yield a mutual
inductance parameter Q1 :
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l1 l21 ðGMD1;3 Þ2 GMD1;3
Q1 ¼ lnf þ 1þ 2
g  1þ þ
GMD1;3 ðGMD1;3 Þ l21 l1

Now, using Mj;k ¼ 2  l  Q and the fact that l1 equals l3 we can write
M1;3 ¼ 2  l1  Q1

M1;3 ¼ 2  l1  Q1
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l1 l21 ðGMD1;3 Þ2 GMD1;3
¼ 2  l1  ½lnf þ 1þ g  1 þ þ
GMD1;3 ðGMD1;3 Þ2 l21 l1
856 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Fig. 8.11 Two parallel conductors (not the same length)

However, because l2 does not equal l4 (l2 [ l4 ; l24 ¼ l2  l4 ), we use two par-
allel (no equal length) filament geometry calculation: Two segments of lengths l2
and l4 , respectively, are separated by a Geometric Mean Distance (GMD2-4). In this
case, 2  M2;4 ¼ ðM2 þ M4 Þ  M24 and the individual M terms are calculated using
equation M ¼ 2  l  Q and the length corresponding to the
Subscript; that is, M2 ¼ 2  l2  Q2 where Q2 is the mutual inductance parameter
GMD
Q for l2 2;4 . We consider w2 ¼ w4 ¼ w24 (Fig. 8.11).

2  M2;4 ¼ ðM2 þ M4 Þ  M24 ; M2 ¼ 2  l2  Q2 ; M4 ¼ 2  l4  Q4 ; M24


¼ 2  ðl2  l4 Þ  Q24
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l2 l22 ðGMD2;4 Þ2 GMD2;4
Q2 ¼ lnf þ 1þ g  1 þ þ
GMD2;4 ðGMD2;4 Þ2 l22 l2
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l4 l24 ðGMD2;4 Þ2 GMD2;4
Q4 ¼ lnf þ 1þ g  1 þ þ
GMD2;4 ðGMD2;4 Þ2 l24 l4

1 1 1
GMD2;4 = exp½ln d2;4  f d2;4 2
þ d2;4 4
þ d
2;4 6
12  ðw24 Þ 60  ðw24 Þ 168  ðw24 Þ
1 1
þ d2;4 8
þ d
2;4 10
þ . . .g
360  ðw24 Þ 660  ðw24 Þ

Since l2 equals l1 and the GMD2-4 remains constant, Q2 must equal Q1 (Q2 = Q1)
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l2
as calculated from Q2 ¼ lnfGMD l2
2;4
þ 1 þ ðGMD2 Þ2 g  . . .. It follows that
2;4

M2 ¼ M1;3 .
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 857

rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l2
To obtain Q4 and Q2-4, however, Q4 ¼ l4
lnfGMD 2;4
þ 1 þ ðGMD4 Þ2 g  . . . must
2;4

be solved for a GMD2;4 .


X
M ¼ M ¼ f2  ðM1;3 þ M2;4 Þg ¼ 2  M1;3  2  M2;4 ¼ 2  M1;3
 ½ðM2 þ M4 Þ  M24
X
M ¼ 4  l1  Q1  2  ðl2  Q2 þ l4  Q4 Þ þ 2  ðl2  l4 Þ  Q24 ; M þ
X
¼0) M\0
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X l1 l21 ðGMD1;3 Þ2 GMD1;3
M ¼ 4  l1  flnf þ 1þ 2
g  1þ þ g
GMD1;3 ðGMD1;3 Þ l21 l1
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l2 l22 ðGMD2;4 Þ2 GMD2;4
 2  ðl2  flnf þ 1þ g  1 þ þ g
GMD2;4 ðGMD2;4 Þ2 l22 l2
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l4 l24 ðGMD2;4 Þ2 GMD2;4
þ l4  flnf þ 1þ g  1 þ þ gÞ
GMD2;4 ðGMD2;4 Þ2 l24 l4
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l4 l24
þ 2  ðl2  l4 Þ  flnf þ 1þ g  . . .g
GMD2;4 ðGMD2;4 Þ2

Result discussion: Negative mutual inductance (M ) results from coupling


between two conductors having current vectors in opposite directions. In electronic
circuits, negative mutual inductance is usually much smaller in magnitude than
overall inductance that it can be neglected with little effect. It is not so true in
microelectronic circuits. P
The sum of all the mutual inductances both positive and negative ( M) is a
negative value and must be deduce from the sum of the self-inductances in our system
for getting the total inductance of single turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna system. Each straight thin film inductor segment is connected to the other by
microstrip line. To analyze our system stability, we represent our equivalent circuit as
a four inductors in series (with series resistance Ri ¼ qAi li i of a straight thin film (strip)
number i; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4) and deduce from each segment P inductance expression the
quarter value of the sum of all mutual inductances ( M) (Fig. 8.12). .

1 X 1 X X 1 X
L0i ¼ Li þ  M; Li ! Li þ  M 8 i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; M\0; Li [  j Mj
4 4 4
1 X 1 X 1 X 1 X
L01 ¼ L1 þ  M; L02 ¼ L2 þ  M; L03 ¼ L3 þ  M; L04 ¼ L4 þ  M
4 4 4 4

Tau1 ¼ s1 ; Tau2 ¼ s2 ; Tau3 ¼ s3 ; Vsi ! e 8 i ¼ 1; 2; 3; Vs1 ! e; Vs2 ! e; Vs3 ! e


858 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Fig. 8.12 Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system equivalent circuit
with delay lines

X
2
IL01 ¼ IR1 ; IL02 ¼ IR1 ; IL03 ¼ IR3 ; IL04 ¼ IR4 ; IL02 ðtÞ ¼ IL01 ðt  s1 Þ; IL03 ðtÞ ¼ IL02 ðt  s2 Þ ¼ IL01 ðt  si Þ
i¼1
X
3 X
3
VA1 VA
IL04 ðtÞ ¼ IL03 ðt  s3 Þ ¼ IL02 ðt  si Þ ¼ IL01 ðt  si Þ; IL04 ¼ ILb ; IL01 ¼ ILa ; IRa ¼ ; IRb ¼ 14
i¼2 i¼1
Ra Rb
d
I Cp ¼ Cp  ðVA14  VA1 Þ; ILb ¼ ICp þ IRb ; ICp ¼ ILa þ IRa ; VA4  VA5 ; VA7  VA8 ; VA10  VA11
dt

dILa dIL dIL0


VA1  VA2 ¼ La  ; VA13  VA14 ¼ Lb  b ; VA2  VA3 ¼ L01  1 ;
dt dt dt
0
dIL02
VA5  VA6 ¼ L2 
dt
dI L 0 dIL0
VA8  VA9 ¼ L03  3 ; VA12  VA13 ¼ L04  4 ;
dt dt
VA3  VA4 VA6  VA7 VA  VA10
IR1 ¼ ; IR 2 ¼ ; IR 3 ¼ 9
R1 R2 R3

VA11  VA12 X4 X4
IR4 ¼ ; VCp þ VLa þ VLb þ VL0i þ VRi ¼ 0
R4 i¼1 i¼1
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 859

VA3  VA5 VA  VA8


VA4  VA5 ; VA4 ! VA5 ; IR1 ¼ ; VA7  VA8 ; VA7 ! VA8 ; IR2 ¼ 6
R1 R2
VA9  VA11 VA3  VA5
VA10  VA11 ; VA10 ! VA11 ; IR3 ¼ ; IR1 ¼ IL01 ; IR1 ! IL01 ; IL01 ¼
R3 R1
VA6  VA8 VA9  VA11
IR2 ¼ IL02 ; IR2 ! IL02 ; IL02 ¼ ; IR3 ¼ IL03 ; IR3 ! IL03 ; IL03 ¼
R2 R3
VA  VA12 X2
IR4 ¼ IL04 ; IR4 ! IL04 ; IL04 ¼ 11 ; IL02 ðtÞ ! IL01 ðt  s1 Þ; IL03 ðtÞ ! IL01 ðt  si Þ
R4 i¼1
X
3
IL04 ðtÞ ! IL01 ðt  si Þ
i¼1

System equation Version 1.0:

X
3
VA1 VA VA  VA 5
ILa ¼ IL01 ; ILb ¼ IL04 ¼ IL01 ðt  si Þ; IRa ¼ ; IRb ¼ 14 ; IL01 ¼ 3 ;
i¼1
Ra Rb R1
VA  VA8 VA  VA11 VA  VA12 d
IL02 ¼ 6 ; IL03 ¼ 9 ; IL04 ¼ 11 ; ICp ¼ Cp  ðVA14  VA1 Þ;
R2 R3 R4 dt
X 3 dIL0
IL01 ðt  si Þ ¼ ICp þ IRb ; ICp ¼ IL01 þ IRa ; VA1  VA2 ¼ La  1 ;
i¼1
dt
P
3
dIL01 ðt  si Þ
dIL01
VA13  VA14 ¼ Lb  i¼1
; VA2  VA3 ¼ L01 
dt dt

P
2
si Þ dIL01 ðt 
dI ðt  s1 Þ
L01
VA5  VA6 ¼  L02 0
; VA8  VA9 ¼ L3  i¼1
;
dt dt
P3
dIL0 ðt  i¼1 si Þ X4 X4
VA12  VA13 ¼ L04  1 ; VCp þ VLa þ VLb þ VL0i þ VRi ¼ 0
dt i¼1 i¼1

&&&

VA1 ¼ IRa  Ra ; VA14 ¼ IRb  Rb ; VA3  VA5 ¼ IL01  R1 ; VA6  VA8 ¼ IL02  R2 ;
VA9  VA11 ¼ IL03  R3
d d
VA11  VA12 ¼ IL04  R4 ; ICp ¼ Cp  ðVA14  VA1 Þ ¼ Cp  ðIRb  Rb  IRa  Ra Þ
dt dt
dIR dIR dIL0 dIL0
ICp ¼ Cp  Rb  b  Cp  Ra  a ; VA1  VA2 ¼ La  1 ) VA2 ¼ VA1  La  1
dt dt dt dt
dIL01 dILb dILb dIL0
VA2 ¼ IRa  Ra  La  ; VA13  VA14 ¼ Lb  ) VA13 ¼ VA14 þ Lb  ¼ VA14 þ Lb  4
dt dt dt dt
860 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
P
3
dIL01 ðt  si Þ
dIL01 dIL01
VA13 ¼ IRb  Rb þ Lb  i¼1
; VA2  VA3 ¼ L01  ) VA3 ¼ VA2  L01 
dt dt dt
dIL01 dIL01 dIL01
V A3 ¼ I Ra  R a  L a   L01  ¼ IRa  Ra  ðLa þ L01 Þ 
dt dt dt
P
3 P
3
dIL01 ðt  si Þ dIL01 ðt  si Þ
VA12  VA13 ¼ L04  i¼1
) VA12 ¼ VA13 þ L04  i¼1
dt dt
P
3 P
3 P
3
dIL01 ðt  si Þ dIL01 ðt  si Þ dIL01 ðt  si Þ
VA12 ¼ IRb  Rb þ Lb  i¼1
þ L04  i¼1
¼ IRb  Rb þ ðLb þ L04 Þ  i¼1
dt dt dt

VA3  VA5
IL01 ¼ ) VA3  VA5 ¼ IL01  R1 ;
R1
dIL01
VA5 ¼ VA3  IL01  R1 ¼ IRa  Ra  ðLa þ L01 Þ   IL01  R1
dt
dIL02 dIL01 ðt  s1 Þ dIL01
VA5  VA6 ¼ L02  ¼ L02  ; VA6 ¼ VA5  L02 
dt dt dt
dIL01 dIL01 ðt  s1 Þ
VA6 ¼ IRa  Ra  ðLa þ L01 Þ   IL01  R1  L02 
dt dt
VA  VA8
IL02 ¼ 6 ) VA6  VA8 ¼ IL02  R2 ;
R2
VA8 ¼ VA6  IL02  R2 ¼ VA6  IL01 ðt  s1 Þ  R2

dIL01 dIL01 ðt  s1 Þ
VA8 ¼ IRa  Ra  ðLa þ L01 Þ   IL01  R1  L02   IL01 ðt  s1 Þ  R2
dt dt
VA11  VA12 X
3
IL04 ¼ ) VA11  VA12 ¼ IL04  R4 ¼ IL01 ðt  si Þ  R 4 ;
R4 i¼1
X
3
VA11 ¼ VA12 þ IL01 ðt  si Þ  R 4
i¼1
P
3
dIL01 ðt  si Þ X
3
VA11 ¼ IRb  Rb þ ðLb þ L04 Þ  i¼1
þ IL01 ðt  s i Þ  R4
dt i¼1
VA9  VA11
IL03 ¼ ) VA9  VA11 ¼ IL03  R3 ;
R3
X
2
VA 9 ¼ VA11 þ IL03  R3 ¼ VA11 þ IL01 ðt  si Þ  R 3
i¼1
P
3
dIL01 ðt  si Þ X
3 X
2
VA9 ¼ IRb  Rb þ ðLb þ L04 Þ  i¼1
þ IL01 ðt  si Þ  R4 þ IL01 ðt  si Þ  R 3
dt i¼1 i¼1
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 861

X
4 X
4 Z
1
VCp þ VLa þ VLb þ VL01 þ VRi ¼ 0; VCp ¼ VA14  VA1 ¼  ICp  dt;
i¼1 i¼1
Cp
dILa
VLa ¼ VA1  VA2 ¼ La 
dt
dIL X4
VLb ¼ VA13  VA14 ¼ Lb  b ; VL0 ¼ VL01 þ VL02 þ VL03 þ VL04 ;
dt i¼1 i
dIL01
VL01 ¼ VA2  VA3 ¼ L01 
dt
P
2
dIL01 ðt  si Þ
dIL01 ðt  s1 Þ
VL02 ¼ VA5  VA6 ¼ L02  ; VL03 ¼ VA8  VA9 ¼ L03  i¼1
dt dt
P
3
dIL01 ðt  si Þ X4
VL04 ¼ VA12  VA13 ¼ L04  i¼1
; VRi ¼ VR1 þ VR2 þ VR3 þ VR4 ;
dt i¼1
VR1 ¼ VA3  VA4 ¼ IL01  R1
q1  l1 q  l2
VR1 ¼ IL01  ; VR2 ¼ VA6  VA7 ¼ R2  IL01 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ IL01 ðt  s1 Þ  2
w1  z1 w 2  z2
X2 X2
q  l3
VR3 ¼ VA9  VA10 ¼ R3  IL03 ¼ R3  IL01 ðt  si Þ ¼ IL01 ðt  si Þ  3
i¼1 i¼1
w3  z3
X
3 X
3
q4  l4
VR4 ¼ VA11  VA12 ¼ R4  IL04 ¼ R4  IL01 ðt  si Þ ¼ IL01 ðt  si Þ 
i¼1 i¼1
w4  z4

X
4
q 1  l1 q  l2 X2
q  l3
VRi ¼ IL01  þ IL01 ðt  s1 Þ  2 þ IL01 ðt  si Þ  3
i¼1
w 1  z1 w 2  z2 i¼1
w3  z3

X
3
q4  l4
þ IL01 ðt  si Þ 
i¼1
w4  z4
X
4
q1  l1 X4
qi  li X
i1 X4 dIL0
VRi ¼  IL01 þ  IL01 ðt  sk Þ; VL01 ¼ L01  1
i¼1
w1  z1 w  zi
i¼2 i k¼1 i¼1
dt
iP
1
X
4 dIL01 ðt  sk Þ
L0i 
k¼1
þ
i¼2
dt
P
2 P
3
X dIL01 ðt  si Þ dIL01 ðt  si Þ
4 dIL01 dIL01 ðt  s1 Þ
VL01 ¼ L01  þ L02  þ L03  i¼1
þ L04  i¼1

i¼1
dt dt dt dt
862 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

P
3
dIL01 ðt  si Þ
dIL01 dIL04 i¼1
ILa ¼ IL01 ; VLa ¼ La  ; ILb ¼ IL04 ) VLb ¼ Lb  ¼ Lb 
dt dt dt
X
4 X
4
VCp þ VLa þ VLb þ VL0i þ VRi ¼ 0
i¼1 i¼1

P
3 P
i1
Z dIL01 ðt  si Þ X4 dIL01 ðt  sk Þ
1 dIL0 dIL 0
 I Cp  dt þ La  1 þ Lb  i¼1
þ L01  1 þ L0i  k¼1
Cp dt dt dt i¼2
dt
q1  l1 X4
qi  li X
i1
þ  IL01 þ  IL01 ðt  sk Þ ¼ 0
w1  z1 w  zi
i¼2 i k¼1

We derivate the above equation and get the following expression: (Table 8.17)

P
3 P
i1
2 d 2 IL01 ðt  si Þ 2 X
4 d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
1 d I L0 d IL01
 I C p þ La  2 1 þ L b  i¼1
þ L01  þ L01  k¼1
Cp dt dt2 dt2 i¼2
dt2
iP
1
X dIL01 ðt  sk Þ
q1  l1 dIL01 4
qi  li k¼1
þ  þ  ¼0
w1  z1 dt i¼2
w i  zi dt

P
3 P
i1
d 2 IL01 ðt  si Þ X d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
d 2 IL0 d 2 0
IL
4
ICp ¼ Cp  fLa  2 1 þ Lb  i¼1
þ L01  2 1 þ L0i  k¼1
dt dt2 dt i¼2
dt2
ð Þ
P
i1
X dIL01 ðt  sk Þ
q1  l1 dI 4
qi  li
L01 k¼1
þ  þ  g
w1  z1 dt w  zi
i¼2 i
dt

Table 8.17 Single turn Case no. s1 s2 s3


square planar straight thin
film inductors antenna s1, s2, 1 s 0 0
and s3 options 2 0 s 0
3 0 0 s
4 s s 0
5 0 s s
6 s 0 s
7 s s s
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 863

X
3 X
3
IL01 ðt  si Þ ¼ ICp þ IRb ) IRb ¼ IL01 ðt  si Þ  ICp ; ICp ¼ IL01 þ IRa ) IRa ¼ ICp  IL01
i¼1 i¼1

d d X3
I C p ¼ Cp  ðIRb  Rb  IRa  Ra Þ ¼ Cp  ð½IL01 ðt  si Þ  ICp  Rb  ½ICp  IL01  Ra Þ
dt dt i¼1

P
3
dIL01 ðt  si Þ
i¼1 dIL01 dICp
ð Þ ICp ¼ Cp  ðRb  þ  Ra   ½Rb þ Ra Þ
dt dt dt

Derivative equation (*):

P
3 iP
1
d 3 IL01 ðt  si Þ X d 3 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
dICp d 3 IL01 d 3 IL01 4
þ L01  L0i 
i¼1 k¼1
¼ Cp  fLa  3 þ Lb  þ
dt dt dt3 dt3 i¼2
dt3
iP
1
2 X d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
q1  l1 d IL01 4
qi  li k¼1
þ  þ  g
w1  z1 dt2 i¼2
wi  zi dt2

Expression (**):

P
3 P
i1
2 d 2 IL01 ðt  si Þ 2 X
4 d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
d I L01 d I L01
 Cp  fLa  þ Lb  i¼1
þ L01  þ L0i  k¼1
dt2 dt2 dt2 i¼2
dt2
iP
1 P3
X dIL01 ðt  sk Þ dIL01 ðt  si Þ
q1  l1 dIL01 4
qi  li k¼1 i¼1 dIL01
þ  þ  g ¼ Cp  ðRb  þ  Ra
w1  z1 dt w  zi
i¼2 i
dt dt dt
P
3 iP
1
3 d 3 IL01 ðt  si Þ 3 X
4 d 3 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
d IL01 d IL01
þ Cp  fLa  þ Lb  i¼1
þ L01  þ L01  k¼1
dt3 dt3 dt3 i¼2
dt3
iP
1
2 0 X d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
q  l1 d I L
4
qi  li k¼1
þ 1  21 þ  g  ½Rb þ Ra Þ
w1  z1 dt w  zi
i¼2 i
dt2

Remark 1.0

P
3
P
d 2 IL01 ðt  si Þ X
3 kðt
3
si Þ
i¼1
; IL01 ðt  si Þ ¼ IL 0 þ iL01  e i¼1 ; IL01 ðtÞ ¼ IL 0 þ iL01  ekt
dt2 i¼1
1 1
864 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

P
3
P P
3
d 2 IL01 ðt  si Þ 3
d 2 IL01 ðt  si Þ
d 2 IL01 ðtÞ i¼1
kðt si Þ
i¼1
¼ iL01  k2  ekt ; ¼ iL01  k2  e i¼1 ;
dt2 dt2 dt2
P
3
d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k si
¼  e i¼1
dt2
Remark 1.1

iP
1 P
2
X d 2 IL0i ðt  sk Þ d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
4 d IL01 ðt  s1 Þ
2
L0i  k¼1
¼ L02  þ L03  k¼1
þ L04
i¼2
dt2 dt2 dt2
P 3
d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
k¼1

dt2
P
2
X
2 kðt sk Þ
IL01 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ IL 0 þ iL01  e kðts1 Þ
; IL01 ðt  sk Þ ¼ IL 0 þ iL01  e k¼1 ;
1 1
k¼1
P
3
X
3 kðt sk Þ
IL01 ðt  sk Þ ¼ IL 0 þ iL01  e k¼1
1
k¼1
d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðt  s1 Þ
IL01 ðtÞ ¼ IL 0 þ iL01  ekt ; ¼ iL01  k2  ekt ; ¼ iL01  k2  ekt  eks1
1 dt2 dt2

P
2
sk Þ P
d 2 IL01 ðt 2
d IL01 ðt  s1 Þ d IL01 ðtÞ ks
2 2
k¼1
k sk
2
¼ 2
e 1
; 2
¼ iL01  k  e  e k¼1
2 kt
dt dt dt
P2 P
3
d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ P
2
d 2 0
I ðt  sk Þ P3

k¼1 d IL1 ðtÞ k sk


2 0 L 1
k¼1 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
¼  e k¼1 ; ¼  e k¼1
dt2 dt2 dt2 dt2
iP
1
d 2 IL0i ðt  sk Þ P
2 P
3
X
4 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k sk d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
L0i  k¼1
¼ L02  e ks1
þ L03  e k¼1 þ L04  e k¼1

i¼2
dt2 dt2 dt2 dt2
P
i1
P P
X d 2 IL0i ðt  sk Þ 2 3
4 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k sk k sk
L0i  k¼1
¼  ½L02 e ks1
þ L03 e k¼1 þ L04 e k¼1
i¼2
dt2 dt2
P
i1
P
X d 2 IL0i ðt  sk Þ j1
4 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ X 4 k sk
L0i  k¼1
¼  0
Lj  e k¼1

i¼2
dt2 dt 2
j¼2
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 865

Remark 1.2

iP
1
X dIL01 ðt  sk Þ
4
q i  li k¼1 dIL01 ðt  s1 Þ dIL01 ðtÞ ks
 ; ¼ e 1
i¼2
w i  zi dt dt dt

iP
1
X dIL01 ðt  sk Þ
4
qi  li k¼1 q2  l2 dIL01 ðt  s1 Þ q  l3
 ¼  þ 3
i¼2
wi  zi dt w 2  z2 dt w3  z3
P2 P3
dIL01 ðt  sk Þ dIL01 ðt  sk Þ
k¼1 q 4  l4 k¼1
 þ 
dt w 4  z4 dt

dIL01 ðt  s1 Þ
IL01 ðt  s1 Þ ¼ IL 0 þ iL01  ekðts1 Þ ; ¼ iL01  k  ekt  eks1 ; IL01 ðtÞ
1 dt
dIL0 ðtÞ
¼ IL 0 þ iL01  ekt ; 1 ¼ iL01  k  ekt
1 dt
P
3
P2 P
2
dIL01 ðt  sk Þ P
3
dIL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ dIL01 ðtÞ k sk
k¼1 dIL01 ðtÞ k sk
¼ e k¼1 ; ¼ e k¼1
dt dt dt dt
Pi1
X4
qi  li dIL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ q2  l2 dIL01 ðtÞ ks1
 ¼  e
w  zi
i¼2 i
dt w 2  z2 dt
P2 P 3

q3  l3 dIL01 ðtÞ k sk q4  l4 dIL01 ðtÞ k sk


þ   e k¼1 þ   e k¼1
w 3  z3 dt w4  z4 dt
Pi1
X4
qi  li dIL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ dIL01 ðtÞ q2  l2 ks1
 ¼ ½ e
w  zi
i¼2 i
dt dt w2  z2
P2 P3

q3  l3 k sk q4  l4 k sk
þ  e k¼1 þ  e k¼1
w 3  z3 w 4  z4
Pi1 P
j1
X4
qi  li dIL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ dIL01 ðtÞ X 4
qj  lj k sk
 ¼   e k¼1
w  zi
i¼2 i
dt dt w  zj
j¼2 j

Remark 1.3

P3 P
3
dIL01 ðt  i¼1 si Þ dIL01 ðtÞ k si
¼ e i¼1
dt dt
866 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Remark 1.4

P P3
d 3 IL01 ðt  3i¼1 si Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ k si
¼  e i¼1
dt3 dt3
Remark 1.5

Pi1 Pj1
X
4 d 3 IL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ X 4 k sk
L0i  ¼  L0
j  e k¼1

i¼2
dt3 dt3 j¼2

Pi1 P2
X
4 d 3 IL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ d 3 IL01 ðt  s1 Þ d 3 IL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ
L0i  ¼ L02  þ L03  þ L04
dt3 dt3 dt3
i¼2
P
d 3 IL01 ðt  3k¼1 sk Þ

dt3
P2 P
2
d 3 IL01 ðt  s1 Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ ks1
d 3 IL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
¼ e ; ¼ e k¼1
dt3 dt3 dt3 dt3
P P3
d 3 IL01 ðt  3k¼1 sk Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
¼  e k¼1
dt3 dt3
Pi1 P
2
X
4 d 3 IL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
L0i  ¼ L02  e ks1
þ L03  e k¼1

i¼2
dt3 dt3 dt3
P3
d 3 0
I L ðtÞ k sk
þ L04  1
 e k¼1
dt3
P P2
X
4 d 3 IL01 ðt  i1k¼1 sk Þ
k sk
L0i  3
¼ ½L02  eks1 þ L03  e k¼1
i¼2
dt
P3

0
k sk d 3 IL01 ðtÞ
þ L4  e k¼1 
dt3
Remark 1.6

Pi1 P
j1
X4
qi  li d 2 IL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ X 4
qj  lj k sk
 ¼   e k¼1
w  zi
i¼2 i
dt2 dt2 w  zj
j¼2 j
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 867

iP
1
X d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
4
qi  li k¼1 q2  l2 d 2 IL01 ðt  s1 Þ q  l3
 ¼  þ 3
i¼2
w i  z i dt 2 w 2  z 2 dt 2 w 3  z3
P2 P3
d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
k¼1 q4  l4 k¼1
 þ 
dt2 w4  z4 dt2

P
2
d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ
d IL01 ðt  s1 Þ
2
d IL01 ðtÞ
2
 eks1 ;
k¼1
¼
dt2 dt2 dt2
P
3
P
2
d 2 IL01 ðt  sk Þ P3
d IL01 ðtÞ k sk
2
k¼1 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
¼  e k¼1 ; ¼  e k¼1
dt2 dt2 dt2
Pi1 P2
X4
qi  li d 2 IL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ q2  l2 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ ks1 q3  l3 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
 ¼  e þ   e k¼1
w  zi
i¼2 i
dt2 w 2  z2 dt2 w 3  z3 dt2
P 3
q4  l4 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k  k¼1 sk
þ  e
w4  z 4 dt2
Pi1 P
2
X4
qi  li d 2 IL01 ðt  k¼1 sk Þ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ q2  l2 ks1 q3  l3 k k¼1 sk
 ¼ ½ e þ e
w  zi
i¼2 i
dt2 dt2 w2  z 2 w 3  z3
P 3

q4  l4 k k¼1 sk
þ e
w4  z 4
We can summary remarks 1.0–1.6 in Table 8.16.
Expression (**):

P3 P
j1
d 2 IL01 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k si d 2 0
I L d 2 0
I L ðtÞ X4 k sk
 Cp  fLa  2 þ Lb  2
 e i¼1 þ L01  2 1 þ 1
2
 L0j  e k¼1
dt dt dt dt j¼2
P
j1 P3

q1  l1 dIL01 dIL01 ðtÞ X 4


qj  lj k sk dIL01 ðtÞ k si dIL01
þ  þ   e k¼1 g ¼ Cp  ðRb   e i¼1 þ  Ra
w1  z1 dt dt w  zj
j¼2 j
dt dt
P3 P
j1
d 3 IL01 d 3 IL01 ðtÞ k si 0
d 3 IL01 d 3 IL01 ðtÞ X 4
0
k sk
þ Cp  fLa  3 þ Lb   e i¼1 þ L 1  þ  L j  e k¼1
dt dt3 dt3 dt3 j¼2
P
j1
2
q1  l1 d IL01 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ X 4
qj  lj k sk
þ  þ  e k¼1 g  ½Rb þ Ra Þ
w1  z1 dt2 dt2 w  zj
j¼2 j
868 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

We define for simplicity the following functions:

P
3 P
j1
k si X
4 k sk
n1 ¼ n1 ðk; si ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ ¼ e i¼1 ; n2 ¼ n2 ðk; L0j ; j ¼ 2; 3; 4; sk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ ¼ L0j e k¼1

j¼2
P
j1
X
4
qj  lj k sk
n3 ¼ n3 ðk; sk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; qj ; lj ; wj ; zj ; j ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4Þ ¼  e k¼1
j¼2
wj  zj

d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ q  l1 dIL01 ðtÞ dIL01 ðtÞ
 Cp  fLa  þ Lb   n1 þ L01  þ  n2 þ 1  þ  n3 g
dt 2 dt 2 dt 2 dt 2 w1  z1 dt dt
dIL0 ðtÞ dIL01 ðtÞ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ
¼ Cp  ðRb  1  n1 þ  Ra þ Cp  fLa  þ Lb   n1 þ L01 
dt dt dt3 dt3 dt3
d 3 IL01 ðtÞ q1  l1 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ
þ  n2 þ  þ  n3 g  ½Rb þ Ra Þ
dt3 w1  z1 dt2 dt2

We define new variables: X1 ¼ X1 ðtÞ; X2 ¼ X2 ðtÞ

dIL01 ðtÞ dX1 ðtÞ d IL01 ðtÞ dX2 ðtÞ d IL01 ðtÞ
2 3
X1 ðtÞ ¼ ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ ¼ 2
; ¼ ; IL01 ¼ IL01 ðtÞ
dt dt dt dt dt3
q1  l1
 Cp  fLa  X2 þ Lb  X2  n1 þ L01  X2 þ X2  n2 þ  X 1 þ X 1  n3 g
w1  z1
¼ Cp  ðRb  X1  n1 þ X1  Ra
dX2 dX2 dX2 dX2 q  l1
þ Cp  fLa  þ Lb   n1 þ L01  þ  n2 þ 1  X2 þ X2  n3 g  ½Rb þ Ra Þ
dt dt dt dt w1  z1

dX2 ½wq11 lz11 þ n3 þ Rb  n1 þ Ra


¼  X1
dt fLa þ Lb  n1 þ L01 þ n2 g  ½Rb þ Ra  Cp
½La þ Lb  n1 þ L01 þ n2 þ Cp  ½Rb þ Ra  ðwq11 lz11 þ n3 Þ
  X2
fLa þ Lb  n1 þ L01 þ n2 g  ½Rb þ Ra  Cp
q1 l1
½ þ n3 þ Rb n1 þ Ra
We define new functions: w1 ¼ fLa þ Lwb1n
z1
0
1 þ L þ n2 g½Rb þ Ra Cp 1

½La þ Lb  n1 þ L01 þ n2 þ Cp  ½Rb þ Ra  ðwq11 lz11 þ n3 Þ


w2 ¼
fLa þ Lb  n1 þ L01 þ n2 g  ½Rb þ Ra  Cp

We can summary our system differential equations:

dIL01 dX1 dX2


¼ X1 ; ¼ X2 ; ¼ w1  X1  w2  X2
dt dt dt
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 869

Case 1.0: No delays, s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s3 ¼ 0

n1 ðsi ¼ 0Þ ¼ n1 ðk; si ¼ 0; i ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ ¼ 1; n2 ðsk ¼ 0Þ ¼ n2 ðk; L0j ; j ¼ 2; 3; 4;


X
4
sk ¼ 0; k ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ ¼ L0j
j¼2
X
4
qj  lj
n3 ðsk ¼ 0Þ ¼ n3 ðk; sk ¼ 0; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; qj ; lj ; wj ; zj ; j ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4Þ ¼
j¼2
wj  zj

P4qj lj
½j¼1 wj zj þ Rb þ Ra
w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ¼ P ; w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
fLa þ Lb þ 4j¼1 L0j g  ½Rb þ Ra  Cp
P P q l
½La þ Lb þ 4j¼1 L0j þ Cp  ½Rb þ Ra  4j¼1 wjj zjj
¼ P
fLa þ Lb þ 4j¼1 L0j g  ½Rb þ Ra  Cp

dIL0

At fixed point: dt1 ¼ 0; dX dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; X1 ¼ 0; X2 ¼ 0
1 dX2

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna
system consists in adding to its coordinated [X1 X2 IL01 ] arbitrarily small increments
of exponential terms ½x1 x2 iL01  ekt , and retaining the first order terms in x1 x2 iL01 . The
system of eight homogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic
equation in the eigenvaluek. The polynomial characteristic equation accepts by set
the Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system equations.
The Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system fixed
values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x1 x2 iL01  ekt are; i = 0
(first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc., [2–4].

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


X1 ðtÞ ¼ X1 þ x1  ekt ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x2  ekt ; IL01 ðtÞ ¼ IL0 þ iL01  ekt
1

dX1 ðtÞ dX2 ðtÞ dIL0 ðtÞ


¼ x1  k  ekt ; ¼ x2  k  ekt ; 1 ¼ iL01  k  ekt
dt dt dt
dIL01 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X1 ) iL01  k  ekt ¼ X1 þ x1  ekt ; X1 ¼ 0; iL01  k þ x1 ¼ 0
dt
dX1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X2 ) x1  k  ekt ¼ X2 þ x2  ekt ; X2 ¼ 0; x1  k þ x2 ¼ 0
dt
dX2
¼ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  X1  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  X2
dt
870 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

ðiÞ ðiÞ
x2  k  ekt ¼ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  ½X1 þ x1  ekt  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  ½X2 þ x2  ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
x2  k  ekt ¼ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  X1  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  X2  w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  x1  ekt
 w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  x2  ekt

ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed points: w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  X1  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  X2 ¼ 0

x2  k  w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  x1  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  x2 ¼ 0

We can summary our single turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna system arbitrarily small increments equations:

x1  k þ x2 ¼ 0; x2  k  w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  x1  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  x2 ¼ 0; iL01  k þ x1


¼0

0 10 x 1
k 1 0 1
@ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ k  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 0 AB C
@ x2 A ¼ 0; A  k  I
1 0 k iL01
0 1
k 1 0
¼ @ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ k  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 0 A
1 0 k
0 1
k 1 0
B C
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0; det@ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ k  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 0 A ¼ 0
1 0 k
   
k  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 0 w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 0
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ k  det  det
0 k 1 k
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ k  ðk þ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0ÞÞ  k  w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  k ¼ k  ½ðk þ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0ÞÞ  k þ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0 ) k1 ¼ 0; k2 þ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  k þ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ¼ 0

qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2  4  w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
k2;3 ¼ ;
2
w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ [ 0; w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ [ 0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w ðs ¼0Þ
w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2  4  ½w 1ðs i;k¼0Þ 2  ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2
2 i;k
k2;3 ¼
2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w ðs ¼0Þ
w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  1  4  ½w 1ðs i;k¼0Þ 2
2 i;k
k2;3 ¼ ;
2 sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 w ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
k2;3 ¼  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  f1 1  4  1 g
2 ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 871

sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 1
1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ 1 1  4  1 ; k ¼  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  1ðw1 ; w2 Þ
2 2;3
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2

The sign of 1ðw1 ; w2 Þ establish the sign of eigenvalues k2 and k3


(w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ [ 0)
w ðs ¼0Þ w ðs ¼0Þ
Case a: 1  4  ½w 1ðs i;k¼0Þ 2 [ 0 ) 0\ ½w 1ðs i;k¼0Þ 2 \ 14
2 i;k 2 i;k

sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ w ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
0\f 1  4  1 2
g\1; 1 [0
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2
) 1ðw1 ; w2 Þ\0; k2 \0; k3 \0

w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 1
Case b: 1  4  2
¼0) 2
¼
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 4

1
1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ 1; k2;3 ¼   w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ; k2 \0; k3 \0
2

w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 1
Case c: 1  4  2
\0 ) 2
[
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 4
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ a b  j; 1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ 1 1  4  1
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2

w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi


iðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ 1  4  2
; iðw1 ; w2 Þ\0; iðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ j  jiðw1 ; w2 Þj
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ 1 j  jiðw1 ; w2 Þj; a ¼ 1; b ¼ jiðw1 ; w2 Þj

1 1
k2;3 ¼  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  ða b  jÞ; w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ [ 0
2 2

We get three eigenvalues for our single turn square planar straight thin film
inductors antenna system. The first eigenvalue (k1) is equal to zero and other
eigenvalues (k2, k3) can be real numbers (k2 ; k3 2 R) and negative (cases a
and b) or complex conjugate numbers (k2;3 ¼ 12  w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ  ða b  jÞ;
w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ [ 0).
872 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

If the first eigenvalue (k1 = 0) and two other eigenvalues (k2 ; k3 2 R) are negative
and real numbers then our single turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna system fixed point is attracting line. If the first eigenvalue (k1 = 0) and two
other eigenvalues (k2 ; k3 2 C) are complex conjugate numbers with negative real
part (a ¼ 1; a\0) then our single turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna system fixed point is attracting stable spiral node line [2–4].
The next cases we analyze are when at least one of the delay parameters is real
and positive value. We analyze our single turn square planar straight thin film
inductors antenna system for the following cases:
Remark: It is reader exercise to analyze single turn square planar straight thin film
inductors antenna system stability for cases 1 to 7 (at least one delay parameter
s1 ; s2 ; s3 is positive and real number). The stability analysis is done by using geo-
metric stability switch criteria in delay differential systems (E. Beretta and Y. Kuang).
It is a practical guideline that combines graphical information with analytical work to
effectively study the local stability of single turn square planar straight thin film
inductors antenna system model involving delay dependent parameters. The stability
of single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system steady state
is determined by the graphs of some functions of s which can be expressed explicitly
[5, 6].
The general geometric criterion: The occurrence of any possible stability
switching resulting from the increase of value of the time delay s for our single turn
square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system characteristic equation.

Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; s3 Þ ¼ detðA  k  IÞ; Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; s3 Þ ¼ 0; Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks


X n X
m
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ  kk ; Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ; n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m
k¼0 k¼0

pk ðÞ; qk ðÞ : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable functions of s.

Pn ðk ¼ 0; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ 0; sÞ ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ q0 ðsÞ 6¼ 0 8 s 2 R þ 0

Pn ðk; sÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s for which we
assume:
(I) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R then Pn ði  x; sÞ þ Qm ði  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R.
(II) lim supfjQm ðk; sÞ=Pn ðk; sÞj : jkj ! 1; Rek  0g\1 for any s.
(III) Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPn ði  x; sÞj2  jQm ði  x; sÞj2 for each s has at most a finite
number of real zeros.
(IV) Each positive root xðsÞ of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable in s
whenever it exists.
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 873

8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under


Parameters Variation

The helix antenna is a type of antenna which uses curved segments. The main
issues regarding helix antenna are helix geometry and parameters, wire connection
concepts, and the Perfect Electric Conductor (PEC) ground plane. A helical antenna
is an antenna consisting of a conducting wire wound in the form of a helix. Helical
antennas are mounted over a ground plane. The feed line is connected between the
bottom of the helix and the ground plane.
Helical antennas can operate in one of two principal modes—normal mode or
axial mode. In the normal mode or broad side helix, the dimensions of the helix are
small compared with the wavelength. The antenna acts similarly to an electrically
short dipole or monopole, and the radiation pattern has a maximum radiation at
right angles to the helix axis. Manly used for compact antennas for portable and
mobile two way radios, and for UHF broadcasting antennas. Additionally the
normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) is used for applications such as mobile and
satellite communication, RFID and medical devices. In the axial mode or end-fire
helix, the dimensions of the helix are comparable to a wavelength. The antenna
functions as a directional antenna radiating a beam off the ends of the helix, along
the antenna’s axis. It radiates circularly polarized radio waves and used for satellite
communications. The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) lumped-element
equivalent circuit is represented the input impedance of a normal mode helical
antenna. The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) is modeled as the combination
of a wire dipole antenna and distributed inductors. The equivalent circuit is divided
into two parts: a five element circuit for the equivalent wire antenna with a different
radius, and a three element sub-circuit representing the effects of the loops. The
geometry of a typical helix antenna is shown in the below figure. There are some
important parameters which characterize our helix antenna. The helix wire of
radius, a, and uniformly wound with a constant pitch, S. The diameter of the
imagined cylinder over which the axis of the helical conductor is wrapped is D and
the radius is R (D = 2 • R). The number of turns is N and the half axial length of the
antenna is h = N • S. We can modeled the helix antenna as a series of loops and
linear conductors when the physical dimensions of the helix are much smaller than
the wavelength [130–132]. We can represent each helix antenna turn as two radi-
ating components, one an axial wire segment of length S, and the other a loop of
diameter D. The wire and loop model can be representing as a short wire segments
connected by lumped elements representing the inductance of the loop, where the
loops are functioned as inductors (each one inductance L). Actually the helix
structure model is a wire segment with a length of S and one inductive element per
turn. We define new radius for the helix antenna wire segment (a0 ; a ! a0 ) since we
need to keep the correct capacitance of the helix turn (a0 ¼ S  ðalÞ½ l ). The length of
S

qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
helix antenna one turns, l where l ¼ ðp  DÞ2 þ S2 . The induced magnetic field of
a single turn can be represented by an inductance Lseg , which includes the
874 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

Fig. 8.13 Geometries of


Helical antenna

self-inductance Lself of one turn and the mutual inductance Mseg coupled from two
adjacent turns Lseg ¼ Lself þ 2  Mseg (Fig. 8.13).
The Lself expression integrates the effects of pitch angle (a), l0 is the of free
space.

8R p  l0  R4
Lself ¼ l0  R  ½lnð Þ  2  cosðaÞ; Mseg ¼ pffiffiffi 3
a 2  ðR2 þ S2 Þ2
pffiffiffi
8R p  l0  R4  2
Lseg ¼ l0  R  ½lnðð Þ  2  cosðaÞ þ 3
a ðR2 þ S2 Þ2

The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) equivalent circuit is divided to two
parts: one modeling the equivalent wire antennas (five elements circuit) and the
other modeling the inductive loops (three elements circuit) (Fig. 8.14).
We define two resonance frequencies for our helix antenna equivalent circuit
(eight elements) f01 ðx01 Þ; f02 ðx02 Þ. Capacitor C0 is the antenna capacitance at fre-
quency below the first resonance frequency f01 ðx01 Þ. We select L0 to resonate with
C0 at the second resonant frequency f02 ðx02 Þ. Inductor L1 is chosen to resonate with
C1 at frequency f02 ðx02 Þ. We estimate C1, L1 and R1 at the first resonant frequency
f01 ðx01 Þ, the reactance of the antenna vanishes and the resistance is R0.
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 875

Fig. 8.14 Helix antenna


equivalent circuit with eight
frequency independent
elements

p  e0  h 1 lnðah0 Þ  1 1 1 x01 1
C0 ¼ ; L0 ¼ ¼ ; A ¼ x01  L0  ¼ ½ 
lnðah0 Þ  1 x202  C0 x202  p  e0  h x01  C0 C0 x202 x01
lnðah0 Þ  1 x01 1 A x01 R20 þ A2 x01 1
A¼ ½ 2  ; C1 ¼ 2  ð Þ; L1 ¼ ð 2  Þ
p  e0  h x02 x01 R0 þ A2 x01  x02
2 2 A x02 x01
p ffiffi

R2 þ A2 Lseg R 8R p  l0  R4  2
R1 ¼ 0 ; Lunit ¼ ¼ l0   ½lnð Þ  2  cosðaÞ þ 3
R0 S S a ðR2 þ S2 Þ2

pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
The axial wave number for the helical structure, k is k ¼ vxp ¼ k02 þ c2 , where
vp is the axial velocity of the wave in the helical structure, which is less than the
light velocity, k0 is a free space wave number, and c is the radial wave number. We
define factor F, which integrate k, h parameters [130, 131].

1 sin2 ðk  hÞ h h Lseg
F ¼ 1þ  ð  1Þ; L2 ¼  Lunit ¼ 
ð1  p2 Þ 1 
2kh sinð2khÞ F F S
2kh

Another factor is H which is frequency dependent. The expression for L3 is


dependent on operational wavelength and function of H. A wavelength of 4  l  N is
considered for our helix antenna (k0 ¼ 4lN
2p
).
876 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

p2 l2 N 2 k02
ð 2  4c2 l2 N 2
Þ
4ð1 þ c2 Þ def
k 1þ
H ¼ Hðc; k0 ; l; N0 Þ ¼ 0 p2
;
ðp4  l2  N 2  k02 Þ
2

L
2  h=½Lunit  p2  c2 2  h=½ Sseg  p2  c2
C3 ¼ ¼
H H

The value of H varies significantly at low frequencies and changes little when k0
is sufficiently large near the resonance. A relationship between k0 and c can be
obtaining from the following expression:

c  D 2 I0 ð 2 Þ  K0 ð 2 Þ
cD cD
2  Lunit  l2  N 2 1
ð Þ  cD  tan2
ðaÞ ¼ 1; L3 ¼  ðH  Þ
k0  D I1 ð 2 Þ  K1 ð 2 Þ
cD h 1þ
4l2 N 2 c2
def
p2

where I0 ; K0 ; I1 , and K1 are modified Bessel functions.


Remark: Helix antenna is modeled as a series of loops and linear conductors and
each turn can be resolved into two radiating components: first is the axial wire
segment of length S and second it a loop of diameter D. We define two parameters
which related to wavelength, Sk ðkÞ ¼ Sk ; Ck ðkÞ ¼ p2R
k . We define the axial ratio of
ðkÞ
the equivalent wire and loop model AR ¼ ½C2SkðkÞ 2.
k

AR ¼ 2RSk
2 p2 . The typical normal mode helical antennas, the axial ratio is much

greater than one (AR  1 ) 2RSk 2 p2  1 ) S  k  2  R  p ). The helical antenna


2 2

wire and inductor model is presented in the below figure (Fig. 8.15).
One application of Helix antenna is RFID antennas. We use it for identification
and tracking of objects using radio waves. RFID tags employ helical antennas
embedded in a dielectric material. The antenna is designed to resonate at around

Fig. 8.15 Helical antenna wire and inductor model


8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 877

specific RFID frequency. RFID IC can be represented as a parallel equivalent


circuit of capacitor and resistor in parallel. The complete RFID tag with helical
antenna equivalent circuit is describe in the below figure [85].
Remark: Helical antenna is connected to RFID IC through microstrip lines. We
neglect in our analysis the parasitic effects of microstrip lines (delay in time)
(Fig. 8.16).

ICrfic þ IRrfic þ IC0 ¼ 0 ðKCL @ A2 Þ; IC0 ¼ IL0 ; IC1 þ IR1 þ IL1 ¼ IL0 ðKCL @ A4 Þ
VA1  VA2 dðVA1  VA2 Þ
IC1 þ IR1 þ IL1 ¼ IC3 þ IL2 ðKCL @ A5 Þ; IL3 ¼ IC3 ; IRrfid ¼ ; ICrfid ¼ Crfid 
Rrfid dt
dIL2 dIL3 dðVA6  VA5 Þ
VL2 ¼ VA1  VA5 ¼ L2  ; VL3 ¼ VA1  VA6 ¼ L3  ; IC3 ¼ C3 
dt dt dt
V A5  V A4 dIL1 dðVA5  VA4 Þ
I R1 ¼ ; VL1 ¼ VA5  VA4 ¼ L1  ; IC1 ¼ C1 
R1 dt dt
dIL0 dðVA3  VA2 Þ
VL0 ¼ VA4  VA3 ¼ L0  ; IC0 ¼ C0 
dt dt

Fig. 8.16 Helix antenna equivalent circuit


878 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

VA1  VA2 dðVA1  VA2 Þ dIR


IRrfid ¼ ) VA1  VA2 ¼ Rrfid  IRrfid ; ICrfid ¼ Crfid  ¼ Crfid  Rrfid  rfid
Rrfid dt dt
VA5  VA4 dIL1 dIR1
IR1 ¼ ) VA5  VA4 ¼ IR1  R1 ; L1  ¼ VA5  VA4 ¼ IR1  R1 ; IC1 ¼ C1  R1 
R1 dt dt
dðVA5  VA4 Þ d dIL1 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL1
IC1 ¼ C1  ¼ C1  ðL1  Þ ¼ C1  L1  2 ; IC1 ¼ C1  L1  2
dt dt dt dt dt
dIR1 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL1 R1 dIR1
R1  ¼ L1  2 ) 2 ¼  :
dt dt dt L1 dt

P
KVL : VAkl ¼ VAk  VAl ; VAkl ¼ 0; k 6¼ l; k ¼ 1; 2; . . .; 6; l ¼ 1; 2; . . .; 6

VA12 þ VA23 þ VA34 þ VA45 þ VA51 ¼ 0; VA51 ¼ VA56  VA61 ;


Z
1
VA12 ¼ VA1  VA2 ¼  ICrfid  dt
Crfid
Z
1 dIL
VA23 ¼ VA2  VA3 ¼   IC0  dt; VA34 ¼ VA3  VA4 ¼ L0  0 ;
C0 dt
Z
1
VA45 ¼ VA4  VA5 ¼   IC1  dt
C1
dIL dIL
VA45 ¼ VA4  VA5 ¼ L1  1 ¼ R1  IR1 ; VA51 ¼ VA5  VA1 ¼ L2  2
dt dt
X Z Z
1 1 dIL
VAkl ¼ 0 )  ICrfid  dt   IC0  dt  L0  0
Crfid C0 dt
Z
1 dIL2
  IC1  dt  L2  ¼0
C1 dt

d X 1 1 d 2 IL 1 d 2 IL
ð VAkl Þ ¼ 0 )  ICrfid   I C0  L 0  2 0   I C1  L 2  2 2 ¼ 0
dt Crfid C0 dt C1 dt
Z
dIL2 1 dIL3
VA51 ¼ VA56  VA61 ) L2  ¼  IC3  dt þ L3  ;
dt C3 dt
d 2 I L2 1 d 2 IL
L2  ¼  I C 3 þ L3  2 3
dt2 C3 dt

System differential equations (Ver.1):

dIR1 d 2 IL dIR
IC1 ¼ C1  R1  ; IC1 ¼ C1  L1  2 1 ; ICrfid ¼ Crfid  Rrfid  rfid
dt dt dt
2 2 2
d IL 1 d IL d IL R1 dIR1 dIL1 R1
L2  2 2 ¼  IC3 þ L3  2 3 ; 2 1 ¼  ; ¼  IR1
dt C3 dt dt L1 dt dt L1
1 1 d 2 IL 1 d 2 IL
 ICrfid   IC0  L0  2 0   IC1  L2  2 2 ¼ 0
Crfid C0 dt C1 dt
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 879

System differential equations (Ver.2): IC0 ¼ IL0 ; IL3 ¼ IC3 ; IL3 ! IC3

IC1 ¼ IL0  IR1  IL1 ; ICrfid ¼ IRrfid  IC0 ¼ IRrfid  IL0 ; IC0 ! IL0
dIR1 d 2 IL dIR
IL0  IR1  IL1 ¼ C1  R1  ; IL0  IR1  IL1 ¼ C1  L1  2 1 ; ICrfid ¼ Crfid  Rrfid  rfid
dt dt dt
d 2 IL2 1 d 2 IC3 dIL1 R1
L2  ¼  IC3 þ L3  2 ; ¼  IR1
dt2 C3 dt dt L1

1 1 d 2 IL 1 d 2 IL
 ðIRrfid  IL0 Þ   IL0  L0  2 0   ðIL0  IR1  IL1 Þ  L2  2 2 ¼ 0
Crfid C0 dt C1 dt

System differential equations (Ver.3):

dIR1 1 1 1 d 2 IL
¼  I L0   IR 1   I L1 ; 2 1
dt C1  R1 C1  R1 C1  R1 dt
1 1 1
¼  IL   IR1   IL
C1  L1 0 C1  L1 C1  L1 1

d 2 IL2 1 d 2 IC dIL R1 dIR 1


L2  ¼  IC3 þ L3  2 3 ; 1 ¼  IR1 ; rfid ¼  ICrfid
dt 2 C3 dt dt L1 dt Crfid  Rrfid
1 1 1 1 d 2 IL 1 1 d 2 IL
  IRrfid  ð þ þ Þ  IL0  L0  2 0 þ  IR1 þ  IL1  L2  2 2 ¼ 0
Crfid Crfid C1 C0 dt C1 C1 dt

d 2 IL1 dIL1 d 2 IL2 dIL2


We define new variables: dY1
dt ¼ dt2 ; Y1 ¼ dt ; dYdt2 ¼ dt2 ; Y2 ¼ dt

dY3 d 2 IC3 dIC3 dY4 d 2 IL0 dIL


¼ ; Y 3 ¼ ; ¼ 2 ; Y4 ¼ 0
dt dt2 dt dt dt dt

System differential equations (Ver.4):

dIR1 1 1 1 dY1 1 1 1
¼  IL   IR1   IL ; ¼  IL   IR1   IL
dt C1  R1 0 C1  R1 C1  R1 1 dt C1  L1 0 C1  L1 C1  L1 1
dIRrfid 1 dIC
¼  ICrfid ; 3 ¼ Y3
dt Crfid  Rrfid dt

dY2 1 dY3 dIL1 R1 dIL dIL dIL


L2  ¼  IC3 þ L3  ; ¼  IR1 ; 1 ¼ Y1 ; 2 ¼ Y2 ; 0 ¼ Y4
dt C3 dt dt L1 dt dt dt
1 1 1 1 dY4 1 1 dY2
  IRrfid  ð þ þ Þ  IL0  L0  þ  IR1 þ  IL  L2  ¼0
Crfid Crfid C1 C0 dt C1 C1 1 dt

dIR1 dIRrfid dIC3


At fixed points: dt ¼ 0; dYdt1 ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dYdt2 ¼ 0; dYdt3 ¼ 0
880 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

dIL1 dIL2 dIL dY4


¼ 0; ¼ 0; 0 ¼ 0; ¼ 0; IL 0 ¼ IL 1
dt dt dt dt
dIR1 dY1 dIR dIC
¼ 0 ) IC 1 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) IC 1 ¼ 0; rfid ¼ 0 ) IC rfid ¼ 0; 3 ¼ 0 ) Y3 ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt
dY2 dY3 dIL1 dIL1
¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) IC3 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) IR1 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 ) Y1 ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt
dIL2 dIL
¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0; 0 ¼ 0 ) Y4 ¼ 0; IC rfid ¼ 0 ) IR rfid þ IL 0 ¼ 0
dt dt
dY4 dY2 1 1 1 1 1
¼ 0; ¼0)  I  ð þ þ Þ  I þ  I ¼ 0; IL 0 ¼ 0
dt dt Crfid Rrfid Crfid C1 C0 L0 C1 L1

1 1
IL 0 ¼ IL 1 ) IR rfid ¼ Crfid  ð þ Þ  IL 0 ; IR rfid þ IL 0 ¼ 0
Crfid C0
1 1
) ½1  Crfid  ð þ Þ  IL 0 ¼ 0
Crfid C0

Our circuit fixed point:

Eð Þ ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; IL 0 ; IL 1 ; IL 2 ; IC 1 ; IC 3 ; IR 1 ; IC rfid ; IR rfid Þ


¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0Þ

Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of helix antenna system consists in adding to its coordinated
[Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 IL0 IL1 IL2 IC1 IC3 IR1 ICrfid IRrfid ] arbitrarily small increments of exponential
terms ½y1 y2 y3 y4 iL0 iL1 iL2 iC1 iC3 iR1 iCrfid iRrfid  ekt , and retaining the first order terms in
y1 y2 y3 y4 iL0 iL1 iL2 iC1 iC3 iR1 iCrfid iRrfid . The system of nine homogeneous equations leads
to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalue k. The polynomial char-
acteristic equation accepts by set the helix antenna system equations. The helix
antenna system fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½y1 y2 y3 y4 iL0 iL1 iL2 iC1 iC3 iR1 iCrfid iRrfid  ekt are; i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second
fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc., [2–4].
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ; Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
IL0 ðtÞ ¼ IL0 þ iL0  ekt ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1  ekt ; IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IC1 þ iC1  ekt ; IC3 ðtÞ ¼ IC3 þ iC3  ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
IR1 ðtÞ ¼ IR1 þ iR1  ekt ; ICrfid ðtÞ ¼ ICrfid þ iCrfid  ekt ; IRrfid ðtÞ ¼ IRrfid þ iRrfid  ekt
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 881

dY1 ðtÞ dY2 ðtÞ dY3 ðtÞ dY4 ðtÞ


¼ y1  k  ekt ; ¼ y2  k  ekt ; ¼ y3  k  ekt ; ¼ y4  k  ekt
dt dt dt dt
dIR1 ðtÞ dIR ðtÞ dIC ðtÞ dIL ðtÞ
¼ iR1  k  ekt ; rfid ¼ iRrfid  k  ekt ; 3 ¼ iC3  k  ekt ; 1 ¼ iL1  k  ekt
dt dt dt dt
dIL0 ðtÞ ðiÞ kt dIL2 ðtÞ
¼ iL0  k  e ; IL2 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 þ iL2  e ;
kt
¼ iL2  k  e kt
dt dt

&&&

dIR1 1 1 1
¼  IL   IR1   IL
dt C1  R1 0 C1  R1 C1  R1 1
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
iR1  k  ekt ¼  ½I þ iL0  ekt   ½I þ iR1  ekt   ½I þ iL1  ekt
C1  R1 L0 C1  R1 R1 C1  R1 L 1
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1
iR1  k  ekt ¼ I  I  I þ  iL  ekt
C1  R1 L0 C1  R1 R1 C1  R1 L1 C1  R1 0
1 1
  iR  ekt   iL  ekt
C1  R1 1 C1  R1 1

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


At fixed points: 1
C1 R1  IL0  C11R1  IR1  C11R1  IL1

1 1 1
iR1  k   iR1 þ  i L0   iL ¼ 0
C1  R1 C1  R1 C1  R1 1

dY1 1 1 1
¼  IL   IR1   IL
dt C1  L1 0 C1  L1 C1  L1 1
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
y1  k  ekt ¼  ½I þ iL0  ekt   ½I þ iR1  ekt   ½I þ iL1  ekt
C1  L 1 L 0 C1  L1 R1 C1  L1 L1
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1
y1  k  ekt ¼ I  I  I þ  iL  ekt
C1  L1 L0 C1  L1 R1 C1  L1 L1 C1  L1 0
1 1
  iR  ekt   iL  ekt
C1  L1 1 C1  L 1 1

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


At fixed points: 1
C1 L1  IL0  C11L1  IR1  C11L1  IL1 ¼ 0

1 1 1
y1  k þ  i L0   iR1   iL ¼ 0
C1  L1 C1  L1 C1  L1 1

dIRrfid 1 1 ðiÞ
¼  ICrfid ; iRrfid  k  ekt ¼  ½I þ iCrfid  ekt
dt Crfid  Rrfid Crfid  Rrfid Crfid
882 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

1 ðiÞ 1
iRrfid  k  ekt ¼ I þ  iCrfid  ekt
Crfid  Rrfid Crfid Crfid  Rrfid

ðiÞ
At fixed points: 1
Crfid Rrfid  ICrfid ¼ 0; iRrfid  k þ 1
Crfid Rrfid  iCrfid ¼ 0

dIC3 ðiÞ ðiÞ


¼ Y3 ) iC3  k  ekt ¼ Y3 þ y3  ekt ; Y3 ¼ 0; iC3  k þ y3 ¼ 0
dt
dY2 1 dY3 1 ðiÞ
L2  ¼  I C 3 þ L3  ; L2  y2  k  ekt ¼  ½I þ iC3  ekt þ L3  y3  k  ekt
dt C3 dt C3 C3
1 ðiÞ 1 1 ðiÞ
L2  y2  k  ekt ¼  I C3 þ  iC3  ekt þ L3  y3  k  ekt ;  IC3 ¼ 0
C3 C3 C3
1 1
L2  y2  k  L3  y3  k ¼  iC3 ; L2  L3 ¼ L23 ; ðy2  y3 Þ  L23  k ¼  i C3
C3 C3
dIL R1 R1 ðiÞ
y2  y3 ! e; iC3 ! e; 1 ¼  IR1 ; iL1  k  ekt ¼  ðIR1 þ iR1  ekt Þ
dt L1 L1
R1 ðiÞ R1 R1 ðiÞ R1
iL1  k  ekt ¼ I þ  iR  ekt ;  IR1 ¼ 0 ) iL1  k þ  iR ¼ 0
L1 R1 L1 1 L1 L1 1

dIL1 ðiÞ ðiÞ


¼ Y1 ; iL1  k  ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1  ekt ; Y1 ¼ 0; iL1  k þ y1 ¼ 0
dt
dIL2 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ Y2 ; iL2  k  ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2  ekt ; Y2 ¼ 0; iL2  k þ y2 ¼ 0
dt
dIL0 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ Y4 ; iL0  k  ekt ¼ Y4 þ y4  ekt ; Y4 ¼ 0; iL0  k þ y4 ¼ 0
dt
1 1 1 1 dY4 1 1 dY2
  IRrfid  ð þ þ Þ  IL0  L0  þ  IR1 þ  IL  L2  ¼0
Crfid Crfid C1 C0 dt C1 C1 1 dt
1 ðiÞ 1 1 1 ðiÞ
  ðIRrfid þ iRrfid  ekt Þ  ð þ þ Þ  ðIL0 þ iL0  ekt Þ
Crfid Crfid C1 C0
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
 L0  y4  k  ekt þ  ðI þ iR1  ekt Þ þ  ðI þ iL1  ekt Þ  L2  y2  k  ekt ¼ 0
C1 R1 C1 L 1
1 1 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1
ð þ þ ÞI þ I þ I  I   iR  ekt
Crfid C1 C0 L0 C1 R1 C1 L1 Crfid Rrfid Crfid rfid
1 1 1 1
ð þ þ Þ  iL0  ekt  L0  y4  k  ekt þ  iR  ekt
Crfid C1 C0 C1 1
1
þ  iL  ekt  L2  y2  k  ekt ¼ 0
C1 1

ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ


At fixed points: ðC1rfid þ 1
C1 þ C0 Þ
1
 I L0 þ 1
C1  IR 1 þ 1
C1  IL1  C1rfid  IRrfid ¼ 0
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 883

1 1 1 1 1 1
ðL2  y2 þ L0  y4 Þ  k   iR  ð þ þ Þ  i L0 þ  iR þ  iL
Crfid rfid Crfid C1 C0 C1 1 C1 1
¼0

L2  L0 ¼ L20
1 1 1 1 1 1
) ðy2 þ y4 Þ  L20  k   iRrfid  ð þ þ Þ  iL0 þ  iR1 þ
Crfid Crfid C1 C0 C1 C1
 i L1
¼0

1 1 1 1 1
y2  y4 ) y2 þ y4  2  y2 ) y2  k   iR  ð þ þ Þ  iL0
2  L20  Crfid rfid 2  L20 Crfid C1 C0
1 1
þ  iR þ  iL ¼ 0
2  L20  C1 1 2  L20  C1 1
1 1 1 1 1
y2  y4 ) y2 þ y4  2  y4 ) y4  k   iR  ð þ þ Þ  iL0
2  Crfid  L20 rfid 2  L20 Crfid C1 C0
1 1
þ  iR þ  iL ¼ 0
2  C1  L20 1 2  C1  L20 1

We can summary our helix antenna system arbitrarily small increments


equations:
1 1 1 1 1 1
 iR1  k   iR þ  iL   iL ¼ 0; y1  k þ  iL   iR   iL ¼ 0
C1  R1 1 C1  R1 0 C1  R1 1 C1  L1 0 C1  L1 1 C1  L1 1
1 R1
 iRrfid kþ  iCrfid ¼ 0; iC3  k þ y3 ¼ 0; iL1  k þ  iR ¼ 0
Crfid  Rrfid L1 1
 iL1  k þ y1 ¼ 0; iL2  k þ y2 ¼ 0; iL0  k þ y4 ¼ 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 y2  k   iR  ð þ þ Þ  iL0 þ  iR þ  iL ¼ 0
2  L20  Crfid rfid 2  L20 Crfid C1 C0 2  L20  C1 1 2  L20  C1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 y4  k   iR  ð þ þ Þ  iL0 þ  iR þ  iL ¼ 0
2  Crfid  L20 rfid 2  L20 Crfid C1 C0 2  C1  L20 1 2  C1  L20 1

0 1
iR1
B y C
B 1C
B C
B iRrfid C 0 1
0 1 B B C
C i11 i12 !
N11 . . . N19 B i C3 C B : : C
B .. .. .. C B B
C B
C C iCrfid
@ . . . A  B i L1 C þ B C ¼0
B C @ : : A y3
N91    N99 B i L2 C
B C i91 i92
B iL C
B 0C
B C
@ y2 A
y4
884 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
!
iCrfid
Assumption: !e
y3

1 1 1
N11 ¼ k  ; N12 ¼ N13 ¼ N14 ¼ 0; N15 ¼  ; N16 ¼ 0; N17 ¼ ; N18 ¼ N19 ¼ 0
C 1  R1 C 1  R1 C 1  R1
1 1 1
N21 ¼ ; N22 ¼ k; N23 ¼ N24 ¼ 0; N25 ¼  ; N26 ¼ 0; N27 ¼ ; N28 ¼ N29 ¼ 0
C 1  R1 C1  L1 C1  L1
N31 ¼ N32 ¼ 0; N33 ¼ k; N34 ¼ . . . ¼ N39 ¼ 0; N41 ¼ N42 ¼ N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k
R1
N45 ¼ . . . ¼ N49 ¼ 0; N51 ¼ ; N52 ¼ N53 ¼ N54 ¼ 0; N55 ¼ k; N56 ¼ . . . ¼ N59 ¼ 0
L1
N61 ¼ . . . ¼ N65 ¼ 0; N66 ¼ k; N67 ¼ 0; N68 ¼ 1; N69 ¼ 0; N71 ¼ . . . ¼ N76 ¼ 0; N77 ¼ k
1 1 1
N78 ¼ 0; N79 ¼ 1; N81 ¼ ; N82 ¼ 0; N83 ¼  ; N84 ¼ 0; N85 ¼
2  L20  C1 2  L20  Crfid 2  L20  C1
1 1 1 1 1
N86 ¼ 0; N87 ¼  ð þ þ Þ; N88 ¼ k; N89 ¼ 0; N91 ¼
2  L20 Crfid C1 C0 2  L20  C1
1 1
N92 ¼ 0; N93 ¼  ; N94 ¼ 0; N95 ¼ ; N96 ¼ 0
2  Crfid  L20 2  C1  L20
1 1 1 1
N97 ¼ ð þ þ Þ; N98 ¼ 0; N99 ¼ k
2  L20 Crfid C1 C0

1
i11 ¼ i12 ¼ i21 ¼ i22 ¼ 0; i31 ¼ ; i32 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ 0; i42 ¼ 1;
Crfid  Rrfid
i51 ¼ i52 ¼ 0; i61 ¼ i62 ¼ 0
i71 ¼ i72 ¼ 0; i81 ¼ i82 ¼ 0; i91 ¼ i92 ¼ 0
0 1 0 1
N11 . . . N19 N11 ... N19
B .. .. .. C B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A; detðA  k  IÞ ¼ 0; det@ . . . A¼0
N91    N99 N91  N99

Eigenvalues stability discussion: Our helix antenna system involving Na vari-


ables (Na > 2, Na = 9), the characteristic equation is of degree Na = 9
P
( 9k¼0 kk  Pk ¼ 0) and must often be solved numerically. Expect in some partic-
ular cases, such an equation has (Na = 9) distinct roots that can be real or complex.
These values are the eigenvalues of the 9  9 Jacobian matrix (A). The general rule
is that the Steady State (SS) is stable if there is no eigenvalue with positive real
part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is positive for the steady state to be unstable.
Our 9-variables (Y1 Y2 Y4 IL0 IL1 IL2 IC3 IR1 IRrfid ) helix antenna system has nine eigen-
values. The type of behavior can be characterized as a function of the position of
these eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be distin-
guished: (1) the nine eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), (2) the
nine eigenvalues are real, eight of them are negative (unstable steady state), (3) and
(4) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and the other
eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), two cases can be
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 885

distinguished depending on the relative value of the real part of the complex
eigenvalues and of the real one, (5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a
negative real part and at least one eigenvalue is positive (unstable steady state).

Exercises

1. We have a system of three N-turn multilayer circular antennas which are


integrated with RFID IC for complete RFID transponder. The first (i = 1) and
second (i = 2) N-turn multilayer circular antennas are connected in parallel
through microstrip lines 1 and 2. They are connected to switch S1 which can be
connected to third N turn multilayer circular antenna (S1 in position a) or to
capacitor Cx and microstrip line 3 (S1 in position b). An N-turn multilayer
circular coil antennas system is influenced by electromagnetic interferences,
which affect their stability behavior but we neglect it in our analysis.
Additionally, microstrip lines in the system have a parasitic effects, a delay
lines Dl1 ; Dl2 and Dl3 respectively. We need to inspect our system performance
under microstrip lines (1, 2, and 3) parasitic affects.

Every N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna has a parasitic DC resistance


which need to be calculated. Index (i) indicated the first N-turn multilayer
circular coil antenna (i = 1) or second N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna
(i = 2) or third N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna (i = 3). We define RFID’s
886 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

N-turn multilayer coil antenna parameters, ai —Average radius of the coil in


cm, Ni —number of turns, bi —winding thickness in cm, Si —wire cross section
area, mi —radius of the wire and hi —winding height in cm. Integrating all those
parameters gives the equation for N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna
2
i Ni Þ
inductance calculation (Lcalci ¼ 6a0:31ða i þ 9hi þ 10bi
½lH ). The length of N turn is
lNi ¼ 2  p  ai  Ni (Assumption: ai  bi ; ai þ bi  ai ). We consider system
three N-turn multilayer circuit coil antennas and not identical.
ak 6¼ al ; Nk 6¼ Nl ; hk 6¼ hl ; bk 6¼ bl ; k 6¼ l; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; l ¼ 1; 2; 3
ak ; Nk ; hk ; bk 2 R þ ; al ; Nl ; hl ; bl 2 R þ
The DC resistance of the N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna:
i Ni 2ai Ni
l
RDCi ¼ riNSi i ¼ 2pa
ri Si ¼ ri m2 . lNi —Total length of the wire, ri —Conductivity
i

of the wire (S/m), Si —wire cross section area (p  m2i ), mi —Radius of the wire.
1:1 Write system differential equations for cases: S1 in position (a) and S1 in
position (b).
1:2 Find system fixed points for the cases: S1 in position (a) and S1 in position
(b).
1:3 Discuss stability and stability switching for the simple case Dl1 ¼ 0, Dl2 ¼
0; Dl3 ¼ 0 Under variation of circuit parameters (switch S1 in position (a).
1:4 Discuss stability and stability switching for the cases: Dl 2 R þ
(1) Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ 0; Dl3 ¼ 0 (2) Dl1 ¼ 0; Dl2 ¼ Dl ; Dl3 ¼ Dl .
(3) Dl1 ¼ Dl3 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ 0 (4) Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ C  Dl1 ; Dl3 ¼ 0;
C 2 Rþ
Under variation of Dl and C parameters (switch S1 in position (a)).
1:5 Return (1.3) and (1.4) for the case, switch S1 in position (b).
Remark: The delay is on the current that flow through microstrip line
IðtÞ ! Iðt  Dl Þ, we consider that VDl ! e(neglect the voltage on
microstrip line). Take care in your analysis and calculation the mutual
inductances
P between each two N-turn multilayer circular antennas in our
system ( M ¼ M þ  M ).
2. We have a system of three N-turn multilayer circular antennas in series, which
are integrated with RFID IC for complete RFID transponder system.
Additionally, there is a capacitors bridge (CA1, CA2, CA3, and CA4) which is
connected to our RFID transponder system and balance the circuit currents
flow. An N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas system is influenced by
electromagnetic interferences which affect their stability behavior but we
neglect it in our analysis. Additionally, microstrip lines in the system have a
parasitic effects, a delay lines Dl1 ; Dl2 and Dl3 respectively. We need to inspect
our system performance under microstrip lines (1, 2, and 3) parasitic affects.
Every N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna has a parasitic DC resistance
which needs to be calculated. Index (i) indicated the first N-turn multilayer
circular coil antenna (i = 1) or second N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna
Exercises 887

(i = 2) or third N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna (i = 3). We define RFID’s


N-turn multilayer coil antenna parameters, ai —Average radius of the coil in
cm, Ni —number of turns, bi —Winding thickness in cm, Si —wire cross section
area, mi —radius of the wire and hi —winding height in cm. Integrating all those
parameters give the equation for N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna
2
i Ni Þ
inductance calculation (Lcalci ¼ 6a0:31ða
i þ 9hi þ 10bi
½lH ). The length of N turn is
lNi ¼ 2  p  ai  Ni (Assumption: ai  bi ; ai þ bi  ai ). We consider System
three N-turn multilayer circuit coil antennas and not identical

ak 6¼ al ; Nk 6¼ Nl ; hk 6¼ hl ; bk 6¼ bl ; k 6¼ l; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; l ¼ 1; 2; 3
ak ; Nk ; hk ; bk 2 R þ ; al ; Nl ; hl ; bl 2 R þ

The DC resistance of the N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna:

l Ni 2  p  ai  Ni 2  ai  Ni
RDCi ¼ ¼ ¼ :
ri  Si ri  Si ri  m2i

lNi —Total length of the wire, ri —Conductivity of the wire (S/m), Si —wire
cross section area (p  m2i ), mi —Radius of the wire.

2:1 Write system differential equations and find fixed points.


2:2 Discuss system stability and stability switching for the simple case under
circuit parameters variation (Dl1 ¼ 0; Dl2 ¼ 0; Dl3 ¼ 0).
888 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

2:3 Discuss stability and stability switching for the cases: Dl 2 R þ


(1) Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ 0; Dl3 ¼ 0 (2) Dl1 ¼ 0; Dl2 ¼ Dl ; Dl3 ¼ Dl .
p ffiffiffiffiffiffi
(3) Dl1 ¼ Dl3 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ 0 (4) Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ ð1 þ C2 Þ  Dl1 ;
3

Dl3 ¼ 0; C 2 R þ
Under variation of Dl and C parameters.
2:4 Bridge’s capacitor CA3 is disconnected. How it influences circuit behavior?
Find system differential equations, fixed points and discuss stability and
stability switching under parameters variations.
2:5 Bridge’s capacitor CA2 is shortened. How it influences circuit behavior?
Find system differential equations, fixed points and discuss stability and
stability switching under parameters variations.
Remark: The delay is on the current that flow through microstrip line
IðtÞ ! Iðt  Dl Þ, we consider that VDl ! e(neglect the voltage on
microstrip line). Take care in your analysis and calculation the mutual
inductances
P between each two N-turn multilayer circular antennas in our
system ( M ¼ M þ  M ).
3. We have a system of two N-turn multilayer circular antennas which can be
integrated with RFID IC for complete RFID transponder system. The first (i = 1)
and second (i = 2) N-turn multilayer circular antennas are connected by two
microstrip lines (1 and 2) and matching network. The matching network can be
Pi-type or T-type. Switch S1 has two positions: first position (a), RFID IC is
connected to first (i = 1) N-turn multilayer circular antenna through matching
network and microstrip line 1. The second (i = 2) N-turn multilayer circular
antenna is disconnected. Second position (b), RFID IC is connected to two N-turn
multilayer circular antennas. An N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas system is
influenced by electromagnetic interferences which affect their stability behavior
but we neglect it in our analysis. Additionally, microstrip lines in the system have
parasitic effects, a delay lines Dl1 ; Dl2 respectively. We need to inspect our system
performance under microstrip lines (1 and 2) parasitic affects. Every N-turn
multilayer circular coil antenna has a parasitic DC resistance which needs to be
calculated. Index (i) indicated the first N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna (i =
1) or second N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna (i = 2). We define RFID’s
N-turn multilayer coil antenna parameters, ai —Average radius of the coil in cm,
Ni —number of turns, bi —Winding thickness in cm, Si —wire cross section area,
mi —radius of the wire and hi —winding height in cm. Integrating all those
parameters give the equation for N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna induc-
2
i Ni Þ
tance calculation Lcalci (Lcalci ¼ 6a0:31ða
i þ 9hi þ 10bi
½lH ). The length of N turn is
lNi ¼ 2  p  ai  Ni (Assumption: ai  bi ; ai þ bi  ai ). Two N-turn multilayer
circuit coil antennas are not identical.

a1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; i ¼ 1; 2; ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi 2 R þ
Exercises 889

The DC resistance of the N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna:

l Ni 2  p  ai  Ni 2  ai  Ni
RDCi ¼ ¼ ¼ :
ri  Si ri  Si ri  m2i

lNi —Total length of the wire,


ri —Conductivity of the wire (S/m), Si —wire cross section area (p  m2i ),
mi —Radius of the wire.

3:1 Write system differential equations for the cases: S1 in position (a) and S1 in
position (b). Matching network is T-type.
3:2 Find system fixed points for the cases: S1 in position (a) and S1 in position
(b). Matching network is T-type.
3:3 Discuss stability and stability switching for the simple case Dl1 ¼ 0; Dl2 ¼
0 under variation of circuit parameters. Switch S1 is in (a) position.
Matching network is T-type.
3:4 Return (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3) for the case we use Pi-type matching network.
3:5 How the circuit dynamic is changed if switch S1 is in (b) position? Return
(3.3) for the case that switch S1 is in position (b).
3:6 Return (3.3) for the case Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ C  Dl ; C; Dl 2 R þ . Discuss
stability and stability switching for variation of C; Dl parameters.
Remark: The delay is on the current that flow through microstrip line
IðtÞ ! Iðt  Dl Þ, we consider that VDl ! e(neglect the voltage on
microstrip line). Take care in your analysis and calculation the mutual
inductances
P between two N-turn multilayer circular antennas in our system
( M ¼ M þ  M ).
4. We have a system of double rectangular spiral antennas which are connected in
parallel through microstrip lines and discrete components. The antennas are
890 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

integrated with RFID IC to complete RFID transponder system. A double rect-


angular spiral antennas system influences by electromagnetic interferences which
effect there stability behavior. Additionally, microstrip lines which are connect
antennas in parallel and have parasitic effects, delays in time Dl1 ; Dl2 respec-
tively. We inspect our system performances under electromagnetic interferences
and microstrip lines parasitic effects. Every rectangular spiral antenna has a
parasitic DC resistance which needs to be calculated. Index (i) indicates first
rectangular spiral antenna (i = 1) or second rectangular spiral antenna (i = 2).
We define RFID’s coil dimensional parameters. A0i, B0i—Overal dimensions of
the coil. Aavgi, Bavgi—Average dimensions of the coil.
ti—track thickness. wi—track width. gi—gaps between tracks. Nci—number of
turns. di—equivalent diameter of the track. Average coil area Aci = Aavgi ∙
Bavgi. Pi—coil manufacturing technology parameter.
Integrating all those parameters gives the equations for rectangular spiral
antenna inductance calculation:

l0 X
4
Lcalci ¼ ð Xki  X3 Þ  NciPi ;
p k¼1;k6¼3
2  Aavgi  Bavgi
X1i ¼ Aavgi  lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ
di  ðAavgi þ A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ

2  Aavgi  Bavgi
X2i ¼ Bavgi  lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ;
di  ðBavgi þ A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ

ðAavgi þ Bavgi Þ 2  ðti þ wi Þ


X4i ¼ ; di ¼ ; Aavgi ¼ A0i  Nci  ðgi þ wi Þ
4 p
Bavgi ¼ B0i  Nci  ðgi þ wi Þ

The rectangular spiral antenna length is calculated as follows: l0i is the length of
the first turn l0i ¼ 2  ðA0i þ B0i Þ  ðwi þ gi Þ. lk is the length of turn k + 1.
We define the following:

NX
ci 1

lTi ¼ l0i þ fA0i  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þ þ B0i  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þ


k¼1
þ A0i  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þ þ B0i  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þg

NX
C 1 NX
C 1

LTi ¼ L0i þ 2  ðA0i þ B0i Þ  ðNCi  1Þ  8  ðwi þ gi Þ  k; k ¼ NCi  1


k¼1 k¼1

LTi ¼ 2  fðA0i þ B0i Þ  ð1 þ NCi Þ  ðwi þ gi Þ  ½4  NCi  3 g


Exercises 891

The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna:

lTi lTi
RDCi ¼ ¼ :
ri  Si ri  p  a2i

lTi—total length of the wire. ri—conductivity of the wire (mX/m). Si—Cross


section area p  a2i . ai—radius of the wire.
Remark: a2i ¼ w2i .

2  fðA0i þ B0i Þ  ð1 þ NCi Þ  ðwi þ gi Þ  ½4  NCi  3 g


RDCi ¼
ri  p  w2i

Due to electromagnetic interferences there are different in time delays respect to


first and second rectangular spiral antennas voltages and voltages derivatives.
The delayed voltages are V1(t − s1) and V2(t − s2) respectively (s1 6¼ s2) and
delayed voltages derivatives are dV1(t − D1)/dt, dV2(t − D2)/dt respectively
ðD1 6¼ D2 ; s1  0Þ;ðs2  0; D1 ; D2  0Þ.

4:1 Write system differential equations and find fixed points for the following
cases: s; D; Dl 2 R þ
(1) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D; D2 ¼ 0; Dl1 ¼ Dl2 ¼ 0.
(2) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0; Dl1 ¼ Dl2 ¼ Dl .
(3) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D; Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ 0.
(4) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D; Dl1 ¼ 0; Dl2 ¼ Dl .
892 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

4:2 Discuss system stability and stability switching under variation of param-
eters s; D; Dl for all cases in (4.1).
4:3 We short inductor La, How it influences our system dynamics and stability.
Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of Ca1 and Ca2.
4:4 We short capacitor Ca1, How it influences our system dynamic and sta-
bility? Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of La.
4:5 We short capacitor Ca2, How it influences our system dynamic and sta-
bility? Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of Ca1.
Remark: The delay is on the current that flow through microstrip line
IðtÞ ! Iðt  Dl Þ, we consider that VDl ! e (neglect the voltage on
microstrip line). Take care in your analysis and calculation the mutual
inductances
P between double rectangular spiral antennas in our system
( M ¼ M þ  M ).
5. We have a system of double rectangular spiral antennas which are connected
through switch S1 to RFID IC. The antennas are integrated with RFID IC and
discrete components (Ca1 ; Ca2 ; La ; Lb ) to complete RFID transponder system.
A double rectangular spiral antennas system influences by electromagnetic
interferences which effect there stability behavior. Additionally, microstrip lines
which are connect antennas to RFID IC and have parasitic effects, delays in
time Dl1 ; Dl2 respectively. We inspect our system performances under elec-
tromagnetic interferences and microstrip lines parasitic effects. Every rectan-
gular spiral antenna has a parasitic DC resistance which needs to be calculated.
Index (i) indicates first rectangular spiral antenna (i = 1) or second rectangular
spiral antenna (i = 2).
Exercises 893

We define RFID’s coil dimensional parameters. A0i, B0i—Overal dimensions of


the coil. Aavgi, Bavgi—Average dimensions of the coil.
ti—track thickness. wi—track width. gi—gaps between tracks. Nci—number of
turns. di—equivalent diameter of the track. Average coil area Aci = Aavgi ∙
Bavgi. Pi—coil manufacturing technology parameter.
Integrating all those parameters gives the equations for rectangular Spiral
antenna inductance calculation:

l0 X
4
Lcalci ¼ ð Xki  X3 Þ  NciPi ;
p k¼1;k6¼3

2  Aavgi  Bavgi
X2i ¼ Bavgi  lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ;
di  ðBavgi þ A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ

ðAavgi þ Bavgi Þ 2  ðti þ wi Þ


X4i ¼ ; di ¼ ; Aavgi ¼ A0i  Nci  ðgi þ wi Þ
4 p
Bavgi ¼ B0i  Nci  ðgi þ wi Þ

The rectangular spiral antenna length is calculated as follows: l0i is the length of
the first turn l0i ¼ 2  ðA0i þ B0i Þ  ðwi þ gi Þ. lk is the length of turn k + 1.
We define the following:

NX
ci 1

lTi ¼ l0i þ fA0i  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þ þ B0i  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þ


k¼1
þ A0i  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þ þ B0i  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðwi þ gi Þg

NX
C 1 NX
C 1

LTi ¼ L0i þ 2  ðA0i þ B0i Þ  ðNCi  1Þ  8  ðwi þ gi Þ  k; k ¼ NCi  1


k¼1 k¼1
LTi ¼ 2  fðA0i þ B0i Þ  ð1 þ NCi Þ  ðwi þ gi Þ  ½4  NCi  3 g

The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna:

lTi lTi
RDCi ¼ ¼ :
ri  Si ri  p  a2i

lTi—total length of the wire. ri—conductivity of the wire (mX/m). Si—Cross


section area p  a2i . ai—radius of the wire.
Remark: a2i ¼ w2i .
894 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

2  fðA0i þ B0i Þ  ð1 þ NCi Þ  ðwi þ gi Þ  ½4  NCi  3 g


RDCi ¼
ri  p  w2i

Due to electromagnetic interferences there are different in time delays respect to


first and second rectangular spiral antennas voltages and voltages derivatives.
The delayed voltages are V1(t − s1) and V2(t − s2) respectively (s1 6¼ s2) and
delayed voltages derivatives are dV1(t − D1)/dt, dV2(t − D2)/dt respectively
ðD1 6¼ D2 ; s1  0Þ;ðs2  0; D1 ; D2  0Þ.
5:1 Write system differential equations and find fixed points for the following
cases: S1 in position (a), S1 in position (b) s; D; Dl 2 R þ and for below
subcases.
(1) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D; D2 ¼ 0; Dl1 ¼ Dl2 ¼ 0.
(2) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0; Dl1 ¼ Dl2 ¼ Dl .
(3) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D; Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ 0.
(4) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D; Dl1 ¼ 0; Dl2 ¼ Dl .
5:2 Discuss system stability and stability switching under variation of param-
eters s; D; Dl for all cases in (5.1).
5:3 We short inductor La, How it influences our system dynamics and stability.
Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of Ca1 and Ca2.
5:4 We short capacitor Ca1, How it influences our system dynamic and sta-
bility? Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of La.
5:5 We short inductor Lb, How it influences our system dynamic and stability?
Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of Ca1.
Remark: The delay is on the current that flow through microstrip line
IðtÞ ! Iðt  Dl Þ, we consider that VDl ! e (neglect the voltage on
microstrip line). Take care in your analysis and calculation the mutual
inductances
P between double rectangular spiral antennas in our system
( M ¼ M þ  M ).
6. We have system of almost two turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna (seven segments). The system is constructed from seven straight thin
film inductors which are connected in almost two turn square structure. The
straight thin film inductors are connected by microstrip lines (A, B, C… F). The
almost two turns square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system is
connected to transceiver module (represent as a transceiver mixer output
equivalent circuit) through two microstrip lines (G and H). Index (i) stands for
straight thin film inductor in place (i). wi is the width of straight thin film
inductor (i) in cm, zi is the thickness of straight thin film inductor (i) in cm, and
li is the length of straight thin film conductor (inductor) in cm. The calculated
inductance of straight thin film inductor (i) is as follow (Li is the segment
inductance in lH):
Exercises 895

2  li wi þ zi
Li ¼ 0:002  li  fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g½lH ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 7
w i þ zi 3  li

Remark: we assume that the magnetic permeability of the conductor material is


1 and the seven straight thin film inductors are not identical

wi 6¼ wj ; li 6¼ lj zi 6¼ zj ðj 6¼ i; j ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 7; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 7Þ:

Consider in your analysis the DC resistivity qi of the straight thin film strip
material and the strip cross section Ai ¼ wi  zi ; Ri ¼ wqii lzii . The dimension of the
straight thin film strip that affects the inductance most strongly is the length li .
The width wi has much weaker influence, and straight thin film strip thickness
can be neglected completely for the limit (zi  wi ). This is in contrast to the
resistance Ri ¼ wqii lzii , which is inversely proportional to the straight thin film strip
896 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

cross section wi  zi and depends on the material properties via its resistivity qi .
The length of each straight thin film strip in our system is not the same to each
other. Microstrip line in our system is represented as a delay line and the delay
is on the current that flows through the microstrip line (s1 ; s2 ; . . .) respectively
(Vsi ! e; i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; A ! 1; B ! 2; . . .).
6:1 Find the expression of system total inductance (LT) which constructed from
the sum of the self-inductances
P of all straight segments and the sum of all
mutual inductances ( M), both negative and positive).
6:2 We short straight segment number 5, find the expression of system total
inductance (LT) which constructed from the sum of the self-inductances
P of
all straight segments and the sum of all mutual inductances ( M), both
negative and positive).
6:3 Find system differential equations and fixed points for (6.1) and (6.2).
6:4 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of system param-
eters (simple case: no delays s1 ¼ s2 ¼    ¼ 0).
6:5 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of delay parameter
s (s1 ¼ s2 ¼    ¼ s).
7. We have system of almost two turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna (six segments). The system is constructed from six straight thin film
inductors which are connected in almost two turn square structure. The straight
thin film inductors are connected by microstrip lines (A, B, C… E). The almost
two turns square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system is connected
to transceiver module (represent as a transceiver mixer output equivalent circuit)
through capacitor bridge (Ca ; Cb ; Cc ; Cd ) and two microstrip lines (F and G).
Index (i) stands for straight thin film inductor in place (i). wi is the width of
straight thin film inductor (i) in cm, zi is the thickness of straight thin film
inductor (i) in cm, and li is the length of straight thin film conductor (inductor) in
cm. The calculated inductance of straight thin film inductor (i) is as follow (Li is
the segment inductance in lH):

2  li wi þ zi
Li ¼ 0:002  li  fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g ½lH ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 7
wi þ zi 3  li

Remark: we assume that the magnetic permeability of the conductor material is


1 and the six straight thin film inductors are not identical

wi 6¼ wj ; li 6¼ lj zi 6¼ zj ðj 6¼ i; j ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 6; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 6Þ:

Consider in your analysis the DC resistivity qi of the straight thin film strip
material and the strip cross section Ai ¼ wi  zi ; Ri ¼ wqii lzii . The dimension of the
straight thin film strip that affects the inductance most strongly is the length li . The
width wi has much weaker influence, and straight thin film strip thickness can be
neglected completely for the limit (zi  wi ). This is in contrast to the resistance
Exercises 897

Ri ¼ wqii lzii , which is inversely proportional to the straight thin film strip cross
section wi  zi and depends on the material properties via its resistivity qi . The
length of each straight thin film strip in our system is not the same to each other.
Microstrip line in our system is represented as a delay line and the delay is on
the current that flows through the microstrip line (s1 ; s2 ; . . .) respectively
(Vsi ! e; i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; A ! 1; B ! 2; . . .).

7:1 Find the expression of system total inductance (LT) which constructed from
the sum of the self-inductances
P of all straight segments and the sum of all
mutual inductances ( M), both negative and positive).
898 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

7:2 We short straight segment number 5, find the expression of system total
inductance (LT) which constructed from the sum of the self-inductances
P of
all straight segments and the sum of all mutual inductances ( M), both
negative and positive).
7:3 Find system differential equations and fixed points for (7.1) and (7.2).
7:4 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of system param-
eters (simple case: no delays s1 ¼ s2 ¼    ¼ 0).
7:5 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of delay parameter
s (s1 ¼ s2 ¼    ¼ s).
8. We have a system of two helical antennas which are connected to RFID IC
through capacitors network (Ca ; Ca1 ; Ca2 ). The dimensional parameters of
helical antennas are hi ; Si ; ai ; Ri ; Di ; i ¼ 1; 2 (hi ; Si ; ai ; Ri ; Di 2 R þ ). We define
the mathematical relationships between helical antennas parameters as follow:
R2 ¼ C1  R1 ; S2 ¼ S1  C2 þ S1  C22
pffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
h2 ¼ C3  h1 ; aa12 ¼ C1 þ C2 ; C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ . The two helical antennas are
not identical. The length of helix antenna on turns, li where
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
li ¼ ðp  Di Þ2 þ S2i ; i ¼ 1; 2. The induced magnetic field of a single turn can
be represented by an inductance LsegðiÞ , which includes the self-inductance
Lself ðiÞ of one turn and the mutual inductance MsegðiÞ coupled from two adjacent
turns LsegðiÞ ¼ Lself ðiÞ þ 2  MsegðiÞ . The Lself ðiÞ expression integrates the effects of
pitch angel (ai ), l0 is the permeability of free space.
Exercises 899

8Ri p  l0  R4i
Lself ðiÞ ¼ l0  Ri  ½lnð Þ  2  cosðai Þ; MsegðiÞ ¼ pffiffiffi 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai 2  ðR2i þ S2i Þ2
pffiffiffi
8Ri p  l0  R4i  2
LsegðiÞ ¼ l0  Ri  ½lnð Þ  2  cosðai Þ þ 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai ðR2 þ S2 Þ2
i i

The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) equivalent circuit is divided to two
parts: one modeling the equivalent wire antenna (five elements circuit) and the
other modeling the inductive loops (three elements circuit). In your system
analysis use the helical antenna equivalent circuit with eight frequency inde-
pendent elements.
Lself ð1Þ
8:1 Find the ratio Lself ð2Þ as a function of parameters C1, C2 and C3. Draw 3D
L ð1Þ
graph, Z-axis (Lself
self ð2Þ
), Y-axis (C1) and X-axis (C2) for the case C2 = C3.
Lself ð2Þ
8:2 Find the ratio Lself ð1Þ as a function of parameters C1, C2 and C3. Draw 3D
L ð2Þ
graph, Z-axis (Lself
self ð1Þ
), Y-axis (C2) and X-axis (C3) for the case C1 = C2.
8:3 Write system differential equations and find fixed points.
8:4 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of parameters C1,
C2 and C3 (C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ ).
8:5 We have a simple case C ¼ C1 ¼ C2 ¼ C3 , discuss stability and stability
switching under variation of C parameter C 2 R þ .
Remark: Take care in your analysis and calculation
P the mutual inductances
between helical antennas in our system ( M ¼ M þ  M ).
9. We have a system of two helical antennas which are connected to RFID IC
through capacitors and inductor network (La ; Ca1 ; Ca2 ) and selective switch S1
(positions a, b). The dimensional parameters of helical antennas are
hi ; Si ; ai ; Ri ; Di ; i ¼ 1; 2 (hi ; Si ; ai ; Ri ; Di 2 R þ ). We define the mathematical
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
relationships between helical antennas parameters as follow: R2 ¼ C1 
pffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffi
R1 ; S2 ¼ S1  C2 þ S1  C22 ; h2 ¼ C3  h1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
p ffiffiffiffiffi

a2 ¼ C1 þ C2 ; C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ . The two helical antennas are not identical.
a1
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
The length of helix antenna on turns, li where li ¼ ðp  Di Þ2 þ S2i ; i ¼ 1; 2.
The induced magnetic field of a single turn can be represented by an inductance
LsegðiÞ , which includes the self-inductance Lself ðiÞ of one turn and the mutual
inductance MsegðiÞ coupled from two adjacent turns LsegðiÞ ¼ Lself ðiÞ þ 2  MsegðiÞ .
The Lself ðiÞ expression integrates the effects of pitch angel (ai ), l0 is the per-
meability of free space.
900 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

8Ri p  l0  R4i
Lself ðiÞ ¼ l0  Ri  ½lnð Þ  2  cosðai Þ; MsegðiÞ ¼ pffiffiffi 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai 2  ðR2i þ S2i Þ2
pffiffiffi
8Ri p  l0  R4i  2
LsegðiÞ ¼ l0  Ri  ½lnð Þ  2  cosðai Þ þ 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai ðR2 þ S2 Þ2
i i

The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) equivalent circuit is divided to two
parts: one modeling the equivalent wire antenna (five elements circuit) and the
other modeling the inductive loops (three elements circuit). In your system
analysis use the helical antenna equivalent circuit with eight frequency inde-
pendent elements.
9:1 Write system differential equations and find fixed points, S1 in a position.
9:2 Write system differential equations and find fixed points, S1 in b position.
9:3 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of parameters C1,
C2 and C3 (C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ ).
9:4 We disconnected capacitor Ca1, how it influences our system behavior?
Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of C parameter
pffiffiffiffi
(C1 ¼ C; C2 ¼ C2 ; C3 ¼ C 2 R þ ).
9:5 We short capacitor Ca2, how it influences our system behavior? Discuss
stability and stability switching for different values of C parameter
Exercises 901

p ffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
(C1 ¼ C þ 1; C2 ¼ C2 ; C3 ¼ C 2 R þ ).
3

Remark: Take care in your analysis and calculation


P the mutual inductances
between helical antennas in our system ( M ¼ M þ  M ).
10. We have a system of two helical antennas which are connected to two RFID
ICs through capacitors and inductor network (La ; Ca1 ; Ca2 ; Ca3 ) and selective
switch S1 (positions a, b). The dimensional parameters of helical antennas are
hi ; Si ; ai ; Ri ; Di ; i ¼ 1; 2 (hi ; Si ; ai ; Ri ; Di 2 R þ ). We define the mathematical
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pp ffiffiffiffiffiffi
relationships between helical antennas parameters as follow: R2 ¼ 3 C1 
pffiffiffiffiffiffi p ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
R1 ; S2 ¼ S1  C2 þ S1  C22 ; h2 ¼ C3  h1 aa12 ¼ C3 þ C2 ; C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ .
The two helical antennas are not identical. The length of helix antenna on turns,
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
li where li ¼ ðp  Di Þ2 þ S2i ; i ¼ 1; 2. The induced magnetic field of a single
turn can be represented by an inductance LsegðiÞ , which includes the
self-inductance Lself ðiÞ of one turn and the mutual inductance MsegðiÞ coupled
from two adjacent turns LsegðiÞ ¼ Lself ðiÞ þ 2  MsegðiÞ . The Lself ðiÞ expression
integrates the effects of pitch angel (ai ), l0 is the permeability of free space.
902 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis

8Ri p  l0  R4i
Lself ðiÞ ¼ l0  Ri  ½lnð Þ  2  cosðai Þ; MsegðiÞ ¼ pffiffiffi 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai 2  ðR2i þ S2i Þ2
pffiffiffi
8Ri p  l0  R4i  2
LsegðiÞ ¼ l0  Ri  ½lnð Þ  2  cosðai Þ þ 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai ðR2 þ S2 Þ2
i i

The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) equivalent circuit is divided to two
parts: one modeling the equivalent wire antenna (five elements circuit) and the
other modeling the inductive loops (three elements circuit). In your system
analysis use the helical antenna equivalent circuit with eight frequency inde-
pendent elements.
10:1 Write system differential equations and find fixed points, S1 in a position.
10:2 Write system differential equations and find fixed points, S1 in b position.
10:3 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of parameters C1,
C2 and C3 (C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ ).
10:4 We disconnected capacitor Ca3, how it influences our system behavior?
Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of C parameter
p ffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
(C1 ¼ C2 ; C2 ¼ C2 ; C3 ¼ C 2 R þ ).
3

10:5 We short capacitor Ca2, how it influences our system behavior? Discuss
stability and stability switching for different values of C parameter
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi p ffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
(C1 ¼ C þ 1; C2 ¼ C2 ; C3 ¼ C 2 R þ ).
3

Remark: Take care in your analysis and calculation P the mutual induc-
tances between helical antennas in our system ( M ¼ M þ  M ).
Chapter 9
Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits
Bifurcation Behavior, Investigation,
Comparison and Conclusion

Microwave RF antennas are an integral part of every RF or microwave system. An


antenna is an electrical device which converts electric power into radio waves, and
vice versa. In many wireless applications antennas are required by radio receiver or
transmitter to couple its electrical connection to the electromagnetic field. When we
inspect system stability which includes radio waves, we inspect electromagnetic
waves which carry signals through the space (or air) at the speed of light with
almost no transmission loss. There are mainly two category antennas, the first is
omnidirectional antenna which receives and/or radiate in all directions. The second
is directional antenna which radiates in a particular direction or pattern. Antennas
are characterized by a number of parameters, radiation pattern and the resulting
gain. Antenna’s gain is dependent on its power in the horizontal directions, and
antenna’s power gain takes into account the antenna’s efficiency (figure of merit).
The physical size of an antenna is a practical issue, particularly at lower frequen-
cies. Resonant antennas mainly use a linear conductor or pair of such elements.
When we implement RF or microwave antennas in higher frequency system (UHF,
microwave), there is no essential need for a smaller physical size. Another
important antenna parameter is the frequency range or bandwidth over which an
antenna functions. The antenna bandwidth can be wide or narrow like in resonant
antennas. In every RF system which includes antenna, we need to choose the
suitable matching network between the transceiver and the antenna. Matching
network is the practical circuit which is corresponding to maximize the power
transfer or minimize signal reflection from the load RF antenna to the transceiver
unit. In wireless application we can differentiate RF and microwave antennas. Radio
spectrum antennas cover radio waves, microwaves and terahertz radiations. Optical
spectrum covers infrared, visible, UV, X-rays and gamma radiations. Radio waves
antennas range from 3 kHz to 300 GHz. Hence RF starts from much lower than the
microwave starting range. Microwave antennas are mainly for EM waves above
1 GHz in frequency. RF and microwave antenna ranges are different in operation
range and applications are concerned. Microwave range starts from 300 MHz to
300 GHz and most microwave applications range up to 100 GHz.
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 903
O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_9
904 9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation …

We can characterize microwave antenna as a high antenna gain and directivity,


large bandwidth, travel by line of sight, microwaves penetrate ionosphere with less
attenuation and less distortion, and in applications of 1–10 GHz range microwave
noise level is very low and hence very low signal can be easily detected at receiver.
The mainly application for RF antennas are mobile, AM/FM radio, television and
the mainly applications for microwave antennas are radar, satellite and space
communication. Antennas are used over much broader frequency ranges and are
achieved using further techniques. The adjustment of an antenna matching network
can allow for any antenna to be matched at any frequency. The loop antennas have
a very narrow bandwidth and are tuned using a parallel capacitance which is
adjusted according to the receiver tuning. The complex impedance of antennas is
related to the electrical length of the antenna at the wavelength in use. The impe-
dance of an antenna can be matched to the feed line and radio by adjusting the
impedance of the feed line. The antenna feed line is as an impedance transformer
and the impedance is adjusted at the load with an antenna tuner, a balun, a matching
transformer, matching networks composed of inductors and capacitors (T-type,
Pi-type, and L-type), or matching sections. We choose wide range of RFID
antennas to fit an equally wide range of tags, readers, and systems. This includes
UHF antennas, patch antennas, and linear or circular polarized antennas.
Each RFID antenna has different strengths, and each fits specific types of RFID
systems. In RFID system, tags are attached to all items that are to be tracked. These
tags are made from tag chip (RFID IC), that is connected to an antenna that can be
built into many and wide variety of industrial asset tags. The tag chip contains
memory which stores the product EPC and other variable information so that it can
be read and tracked by RFID reader anywhere. In our analysis we represent tag chip
as a parallel resistor (Rrfid) and capacitor (Crfid). An RFID reader is a network
connected device (fixed or mobile) with an antenna that sends power as well as data
and commands to the tags. The RFID reader acts like an access point for RFID
tagged items. An RFID tags are comprised of an integrated circuit (RFID IC)
attached to an antenna that has been printed, etched, stamped or vapor-deposited
onto a mount which is often a paper substrate or PolyEthylene Terephthalate (PET).
We inspect RF and microwave systems which involve, RF and microwave devices
(RFID transponders, RF transistors, RF diodes, MMICs, Reflection Type Phase
Shifter (RTPS), cylindrical RF network antennas, Tunnel Diode (TD), microwave
field effect transistor (FETs), Impact Ionization Avalanche Transit Time (IMPATT),
PIN diodes, Small Signal (SS) amplifiers, matching networks, Power Amplifiers
(PAs), RF oscillators, RF filters, and antenna systems) as a dynamical system where
a fixed rule describes the time dependent of specific RF circuit voltage in a geo-
metrical space. Examples include the mathematical models that describe circuit
with RF and microwave devices. At any time a dynamical system has a state given
by a set of real numbers (a vector) which can be represented by a specific voltage in
an appropriate state space (a geometrical manifold). Small changes in the state of
the RF and microwave system create small changes in the numbers. The evolution
rule of the RF and microwave dynamical system is a fixed rule that describes what
future states follow from the current state. The rule is deterministic, for a given time
9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation … 905

interval only one future state follows from the current state. A RF and microwave
dynamical system is a phase (or state) space endowed with a family of smooth
evolution functions that for any element of time (t), map a point of the phase space
back into the phase space. RF and microwave systems can be described by num-
bers. The state vector is a numerical description of the current configuration of a
system. For example, RFID circuit with RFID IC and antenna (inductance element)
can be described using some numbers: its voltages (V1 ; V2 ; V3 ; . . .) and currents
(I1 ; I2 ; I3 ; . . .). Once we know these numbers V1 ; V2 ; V3 ; . . . and I1 ; I2 ; I3 ; . . . the
voltages and currents trajectories are completely determined. The group of numbers
(V1 ; V2 ; V3 ; . . ., I1 ; I2 ; I3 ; . . .) is a vector which completely describes the state of our
RF and microwave system and hence is called the state vector system. There are
two main behaviors which are related to RF and microwave systems: (1) the system
gravitates toward a fixed point, or (2) the system blowup. There are additional cases
of oscillators related to RF and microwave system. We assume fi ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . . are
differentiable with continuous derivatives. The vectors Vi are the state of the
microwave and RF dynamical system, and the functions fi ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . . tell us
how the system moves. In special circumstances, however, the system does not
move. The system can be stuck (we will say fixed) in a special state; we call these
states fixed points of the dynamical RF and microwave system. Not all fixed points
are the same. We call some stable and others unstable. Is the specific fixed point
Vi ; Ii stable or unstable? The answer is, neither. To see that it is not stable, consider
any points Vi0 ; Ii0 near (but not equal to) Vi ; Ii (i = 1, 2, 3…). At t ! 1 the RF
system never approaches (Vi ; Ii ). Further, Vi ; Ii are not unstable. To be unstable,
points near Vi ; Ii must be sent “far” away from Vi ; Ii . Clearly, if we start at certain
distance from Vi ; Ii the system does not get any farther away. Stable fixed points
give excellent information about the fate of a dynamical system.
In our analysis we investigate RF and microwave circuits bifurcation and dy-
namical behavior. Bifurcation behavior in our RF system is the study of changes in
the qualitative or topological structure of RF system, vector fields, and the solutions
of a family of differential equations. A bifurcation occurs when a small smooth
change made to the parameter values (the bifurcation parameters) of a RF and
microwave system causes a sudden topological change in behavior. Bifurcations
occur in both our continuous RF systems (ODEs, DDEs, and PDEs) and discrete
systems (described by maps). We can inspect in our microwave and RF system two
principal bifurcation classes: local bifurcation, which our RF system can be ana-
lyzed through changes in the local stability properties of equilibria, periodic orbits
or other invariant sets as parameters cross through critical thresholds. Global
bifurcations, which often occur in RF and microwave system happened when larger
invariant sets of the system collide with each other, or with equilibria of the system.
They cannot be detected only by stability analysis (fixed points). A local bifurcation
occurs when a system parameter change causes the stability of an equilibrium (or
fixed point) to change. In continuous system, this corresponds to the real part of an
eigenvalue of an equilibrium passing through zero. Global bifurcations occur when
larger invariant sets, such as periodic orbits, collide with equilibria. This causes
906 9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation …

changes in the topology of the trajectories in the phase space which cannot be
confined to a small neighborhood (local bifurcation). The changes in system
topology extend out to an arbitrarily large distance. In our analysis we pay attention
to the co-dimension of a bifurcation which is the number of parameters which must
be varied for the bifurcation to occur. The co-dimension of the parameter set for
which the bifurcation occurs within the full space of RF system parameters. The
simple case for stability analysis is when there are no time delay elements in our RF
and microwave system (s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ 0; s3 ¼ 0; . . .; D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ 0; D3 ¼ 0; . . .;
Dli ¼ 0; i ¼ 1; 2:3; . . .).
If our RF and microwave system involving Na variables (Na > 2), the charac-
P a k
teristic equation is of degree Na ( Nk¼0 k  Pk ¼ 0) and must often be solved
numerically. Expect in some particular cases, such an equation has Na distinct roots
that can be real or complex. These values are the eigenvalues of the Na  Na
Jacobian matrix (A). The general rule is that the Steady State (SS) is stable if there
is no eigenvalue with positive real part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is positive
for the steady state to be unstable. Our Na-variables RF and microwave system has
Na eigenvalues. The type of behavior can be characterized as a function of the
position of these eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be
distinguished: (1) the Na eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state),
(2) the Na eigenvalues are real, Na − 1 of them are negative (unstable steady state),
(3) and (4) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and the
other eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), two cases can be
distinguished depending on the relative value of the real part of the complex
eigenvalues and of the real one, (5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a
negative real part and at least one eigenvalue is positive (unstable steady state). The
next case is when there are delay elements in our RF and microwave system and we
can’t neglect them. In that case, our RF and microwave system stability analysis is
related to two main cases: first case, RF or microwave system is characterized by a
set of voltages (V1 ; V2 ; V3 ; :. . .) or/and currents (I1 ; I2 ; I3 ; . . .). Due to electromag-
netic interferences there are differences in time delays with respect to system
voltages and current variables

V1 ðtÞ ! V1 ðt  s1 Þ; V2 ðtÞ ! V2 ðt  s2 Þ; Vi ðtÞ ! Vi ðt  si Þ; I1 ðtÞ ! I1 ðt  s1 Þ


I2 ðtÞ ! I2 ðt  s2 Þ; Ii ðtÞ ! Ii ðt  si Þ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . .; sk 6¼ sl ; k 6¼ l; si 2 R þ :

Sometimes the delay in time is related to circuit voltages derivatives:

dV1 ðtÞ dV1 ðt  D1 Þ dV2 ðtÞ dV2 ðt  D2 Þ


! ; ! ;
dt dt dt dt
dVi ðtÞ dVi ðt  Di Þ
! ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . .
dt dt

We assume Dk ¼ 6 Dl ; k 6¼ l; Di 2 R þ . The stability of a given steady state is


determined by the graphs of some function of s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; . . . or/and D1 ; D2 ; D3 ; . . .
9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation … 907

which can be expressed explicitly and thus can be easily depicted by software. f
need to look at one such function and locate the zeros. The stability switching is due
to different values of delay parameters s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; . . . or/and D1 ; D2 ; D3 ; . . .. Second
case, RF and microwave circuits include microstrip lines. Microstrip lines have
parasitic effects, a delay in time Dli ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . .. The delays are on the current
that flow through microstrip lines IðtÞ ! Iðt  Dli Þ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . .. We consider
VDli ! e (neglect the voltage on microstrip lines). We inspect the stability behavior
and stability switching under variation of delay parameters Dli ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . .. In
our RF and microwave systems which include antennas (inductances elements), we
take care in our analysis
P and calculation the mutual inductances between antennas
within the system ( M ¼ M þ  M ).
If we minimize our RF and microwave system to specific case where there is
only one time delay parameter s then the general geometric criterion: The occur-
rence of any possible stability switching resulting from the increase of value of the
time delay s for our RF and microwave system characteristic equation.

Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; . . .Þ ¼ detðA  k  IÞ; Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; . . .Þ ¼ 0;


Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ  eks
X
n X
m
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ  kk ; Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ  kk ; n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m
k¼0 k¼0

pk ðÞ; qk ðÞ: R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable functions of s.

Pn ðk ¼ 0; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ 0; sÞ ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ q0 ðsÞ 6¼ 0 8 s 2 R þ 0

Pn ðk; sÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s for which we
assume (Pn ðk; sÞ ! P; Qm ðk; sÞ ! Q):
(I) If k ¼ i  x; x 2 R then Pn ði  x; sÞ þ Qm ði  x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R.
(II) lim supfjQm ðk; sÞ=Pn ðk; sÞj : jkj ! 1; Rek  0g\1 for any s.
(III) Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPn ði  x; sÞj2 jQm ði  x; sÞj2 for each s has at most a finite
number of real zeros.
(IV) Each positive root xðsÞ of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable in s
whenever it exists.
In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have
Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ, and Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ thus k ¼ i  x, x [ 0 may be on
eigenvalue of characteristic equation. The analysis consists in identifying the roots
of characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k—plane,
where by increasing the parameters of RF and microwave system, Re k may, at the
crossing Change its sign from (−) to (+), i.e. from a stable focus Eð0Þ to an unstable
one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of
the partial derivatives with respect to s and RF/Microwave system parameters
[2, 3].
908 9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation …

 
1 @Rek
^ ðsÞ ¼ ;
@s k¼ix
Other RF and microwave parameters ¼ const where x 2 R þ :
PN
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 N2k  x
2k
¼ 0 ; N 2 Z þ when writing
PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i  PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i  QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼ i  x into
RF system’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin x  s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2

PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos x  s ¼ hðxÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

where jQði  xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view of requirement (a) above, ðg; hÞ 2 R. Furthermore, it


follows above sin x  s and cos x  s equations that, by squaring and adding the
sides, x must be a positive root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði  xÞj2 jQði  xÞj2 ¼ 0. Note: FðxÞ
is dependent of s. Now it is important to notice that if s 62 I (assume that I  R þ 0 is
the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for s 62 I , xðsÞ is not define. Then
for all s in I, xðsÞ is satisfies that Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0). Then there are no positive xðsÞ
solutions for Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have stability switches. For any s 2 I ,
where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, we can define the angle hðsÞ 2
½0; 2  p as the solution of the below equations:

PR ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði  xÞj2

PR ði  xÞ  QR ði  xÞ þ PI ði  xÞ  QI ði  xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 
jQði  xÞj2

And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ  s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ  s ¼ hðsÞ þ n  2  p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
þ n2p
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ ; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R ;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s  sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; R1 ; C1 and RF microwave parameters indicate the
corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on, ^ðxÞ remember in
k ðparametersÞ; x ðparametersÞ, and keeping all parameters except one (x) and s.
The derivation closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiating RF system
characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ  eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter
(x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation … 909

Remark: x ¼ RF system specific parameter


 1
@k Pk ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ þ Qk ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ  s  Pðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ
¼
@x Px ðk; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  Qx ðk; xÞ  Pðk; xÞ

where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; :. . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i  x, and bearing Pði  xÞ ¼ Pði  xÞ,
Qði  xÞ ¼ Qði  xÞ then i  Pk ði  xÞ ¼ Px ði  xÞ and i  Qk ði  xÞ ¼ Qx ði  xÞ
that on the surface jPði  xÞj2 ¼ jQði  xÞj2 , one obtains
 1 !
@k i  Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ þ i  Qk ði  x; xÞ  Qðk; xÞ  s  jPði  x; xÞj2
jk¼ix ¼
@x Px ði  x; xÞ  Pði  x; xÞ  Qx ði  x; xÞ  Qði  x; xÞ

Upon separating into real and imaginary parts, with P ¼ PR þ i  PI ; Q ¼


QR þ i  QI Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼ QRx þ i  QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i  PIx ; Qx ¼
QRx þ i  QIx P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I . When (x) can be any RF system parameters and time
delay s etc., where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments ði  x; xÞ, and
where Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx  PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ; Fx ¼ 2  ½ðPRx 
PR þ PIx  PI Þ  ðQRx  QR þ QIx  QI Þ xx ¼ Fx =Fx . We define U and V: U ¼
ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR  QIx  QI  QRx Þ V ¼ ðPR  PIx  PI  PRx Þ  ðQR 
QIx  QI  QRx Þ. We choose our specific parameter as time delay x = s.
Differentiating with respect to s and we get Fx  @x @x
@s þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) @s ¼  Fx
Fs

 
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ;
@s k¼ix
( )
1 2  ½U þ s  jPj2  þ i  Fx
^ ðsÞ ¼ Re ;
Fs þ i  2  ½V þ x  jPj2 
@x Fs
¼ xs ¼ 
@s Fx
  
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ sign ;
@s k¼ix
( )
1 @x U  @x
@s þ V
signf^ ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g  sign s  þxþ
@s jPj2

We shall presently examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcations)


in RF system, about the equilibrium point as a result of a variation of delay
parameters. The analysis consists in identifying the roots of our system charac-
teristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane where by
increasing the delay parameter s, Re k may at the crossing, change its sign from
910 9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation …

− to +, i.e. from a stable focus E(*) to an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature
may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with respect
tos, ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re
@s Þk¼ix :
k

Among microwave elements there are discrete circuit, packages


diodes/transistors which are mounted in coax and waveguide assemblies, mi-
crowave integrated circuit and monolithic microwave integrated circuit. Stability
analysis is also done for microwave transmission lines and full optimization. Many
microwave circulators involve Reflection Type Phase Shifter (RTPS). Microstrip
transmission lines are integral parts in RF circulator. A special type of antenna
system is a cylindrical RF network antenna for coupled plasma sources which
include copper legs. Many RF circuits include Tunnel Diode (TD) which is a p-n
junction device that exhibits negative resistance. Microwave oscillators integrate
Tunnel Diode (TD) elements and stability switching analysis is done. In many
applications there are microwave semiconductor amplifiers. Bipolar transistor,
FETs and IMPATT amplifiers are inspected when we integrate them in RF and
microwave systems. Devices internal parameters influence the functionality of those
circuit and RF modules. Internal parameters variation and circuit microstrip lines
parasitic effects are inspected for best performance. There are many types of
amplifiers, among them zero frequency amplifiers (DC amplifiers), audio amplifiers,
RF amplifiers, and they come in three basic flavours: Common Base
(CB) amplifiers, Common Collector (CC) amplifiers, and Common Emitter
(CE) amplifiers. It is very important to design the right matching network which
matches between the amplifier output and the load. Good matching avoids reflec-
tions and enhances the functionality of our RF system. Bias—T circuit is a very
important element of any RF and microwave system which there is a need to
combine RF and DC signals or to separate combined signal to RF and DC signals.
Stability analysis of Bias—T circuit is done when integrating it in RF system to get
the best performances. Power Amplifiers (PAs) are analysed for best performances
and stability analysis is done. There are different types of amplifiers which clas-
sified according their circuit configurations and method of operation. There are two
basic amplifier classes groups. The first are the classically controlled conduction
angle amplifiers forming the more common amplifier classes (A, B, AB, and C).
The second set amplifiers are the newer so-called “switching” amplifier classes (D,
E, F, G, S, and T). We analyse the stability of these amplifiers by inspecting the
equivalent circuit differential equations. BJT transistor is replaced by large signal
model and more enhance model is Gummel-Poon model. We analyse the stability
of wideband LNAs with negative feedback under circuit’s parameters variation.
A microwave oscillator is an active device to generate power and a resonator to
control the frequency of the microwave signal. Important issues in oscillators are
frequency stability, frequency tuning, and phase noise. Phase shift resonator circuit
is widely used and stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small Signal
(SS) equivalent circuit model. Closed loop functioning oscillator can be viewed as
feedback system. There are three types of transistor LC oscillators, Colpitts,
Hartley, and Clapp. Colpitt’s oscillator circuit stability analysis is done by criterion
9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation … 911

of Liapunov. The target of analogy and RF filtering is to modify the magnitude and
phase of signal frequency components. Many analogy or Radio Frequency
(RF) circuits perform filtering on the signal passing through them. A diplexer is a
passive device that implements frequency domain multiplexing. We analyse BPF
diplexer circuit stability by using geometric stability switch criteria in delay dif-
ferential systems. There are lattice crystal filter, half lattice and cascaded half lattice
filters. A tunable BPF employing varactor diodes is ideal for many diverse wireless
applications. BPF (varactor diodes) circuit involving N variables and stability
behaviour is inspected. An antenna is a conductor or group of conductors used for
radiating electromagnetic energy into space or collecting electromagnetic energy
from space. There are many types of antennas and the operation at microwave
frequencies is inspected for the best performances. N—turn multilayer circular coil
antennas with RFID IC is investigated and stability optimization under delayed
electromagnetic interference and parasitic effects is analysed. Double rectangular
spiral antennas are constructed from two antennas and they are connected in series
with microstrip lines and RFID IC. A system of single turn square planar straight
thin film inductors antenna is constructed from four straight thin film inductors
which are connected in a single turn square structure. A Helical antenna is an
antenna consisting of a conducting wire wound in the form of a helix. Helix antenna
system stability is inspected under parameters variation.
Appendix A
RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz
Design and Analysis

A.1 LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

We have RFID Antenna system on a substrate, width 300 lm and lr = 450. The
antenna is constructed from silver ointment which his resistance is bigger than pure
silver by 50 %. Track width is 20 lm, gap between tracks 20 lm, track depth is
20 lm up to 100 lm. The requested antenna inductance is 2.66 mH and parasitic
resistance less than 10 X. We need to find the number of rectangular spiral
antenna’s turn (Nc). Since the RFID antenna substrate permeability is 450 (lr =
450), RFID antenna permeability is average value between air permeability and the
magnet. We consider that the TAG permeability is 100–300 (lr). Possible TAG
dimensions: 5 mm  5 mm, 6 mm  6 mm, 7 mm  7 mm, 8 mm  8 mm and
permeability 100, 200, 300 (lr) (Fig. A.1).
Part A: Analysis for l = l0 and l = lr  l0 (lr = 450).

H H
l0 ¼ 4  p  107  1:2566  106 ;
m m
l
lr ¼ ) l ¼ lr  l0 jlr ¼450 ¼ 450  1:2566  106 ¼ 565:47  106
l0

ðt þ wÞ ð20 lm þ 20 lmÞ
t ¼ g ¼ 20 lm ) d ¼ 2  ¼2 ¼ 25:47 lm; t ¼ 20 lm
P 3:14

d—Equivalent diameter of the track

Aavg ¼ A0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ ¼ 0:005  Nc  ð20 lm þ 20 lmÞ ¼ 0:005  Nc  40 lm


¼ 0:005  Nc  40  106
Bavg ¼ B0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ ¼ 0:005  Nc  ð20 lm þ 20 lmÞ ¼ 0:005  Nc  40 lm
¼ 0:005  Nc  40  106

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 913


O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6
914 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

5 mm

0.3 mm

5 mm

Fig. A.1 RFID antenna system constructed from silver ointment

Fig. A.2 RFID rectangular spiral antenna overall parameters

d ¼ 2  ðt þ wÞ=p; Aavg ¼ a0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ; Bavg ¼ b0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ

A0, B0—Overall dimensions of the coil. Aavg, Bavg—Average dimensions of


the coil. t—Track thickness, w—Track width, g—Gap between tracks. Nc—
Number of turns, d—Equivalent diameter of the track. Average coil area;
Ac = Aavg  Bavg. Integrating all those parameters give the equations for induc-
tance calculation (Fig. A.2):
2 3 2 3
6 2  Aavg  Bavg 7 6 2  Aavg  Bavg 7
X1 ¼ Aavg  ln4 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi5; X2 ¼ Bavg  ln4 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi5
d  ðAavg þ Aavg þ Bavg
2 2 d  ðBavg þ Aavg þ Bavg
2 2

qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ðAavg þ Bavg Þ


X3 ¼ 2  ½Aavg þ Bavg  A2avg þ B2avg ; X4 ¼
4
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 915

Table A.1 RFID coil manufacturing technology (wired, etched, printed)


Coil manufacturing technology P
Wired 1.8–1.9
Etched 1.75–1.85
Printed 1.7–1.8

The RFID’s coil calculation inductance expression is


 
Lcalc ¼ lp0  ðX1 þ X2  X3 þ X4 Þ  Ncp ; L1 = Lcalc
Definition of limits, Estimations: Track thickness t, Al and Cu coils (t > 30 lm).
The printed coils as high as possible. Estimation of turn exponent p is needed for
inductance calculation (Table A.1).
We integrate the Lcalc value inside the differential equations which characterize
the RFID system with the Coil inductance. Nc ! z; A0 ! x; B0 ! y
MATLAB Script:
Z = 10; x = 0.005 – z * 40 * (1e−6); y = 0.005 – z * 40 * (1e−6); x1 = x *
log (2 * x * y/(25.47 * (1e−6) * (x + sqrt(x * x + y * y)))); x2 = y * log(2 * x * y/
(25.47 * (1e−6) * (y + sqrt(x * x + y * y)))); x3 = 2 * (x + y− sqrt(x * x + y * y));
x4 = (x + y)/4; l = ((1.2566 * (1e−6)/3.14) * (x1 + x2 − x3 + x4) * power(z,1.8))
The results in Table A.2:
Result: the most close inductance to our request 2.66 mH is 2.8 mH (Nc = 30,
lr = 450).
Rectangular spiral RFID antenna length calculation & resistance
We have the following rectangular spiral RFID antenna and first we need to
calculate the total length (Fig. A.3).
A0, B0—Overall dimensions of the coil. Aavg, Bavg—Average dimensions of
the coil. w—Track width, g—Gap between tracks. Nc—Number of turns. L0 is the
length of the first turn L0 ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðw þ gÞ. Lk is the length of turn k + 1.

k ¼ 1 ) L1 ¼ A0  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  2  ðw þ gÞ þ A0  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  3  ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 2 ) L2 ¼ A0  3  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ þ A0  4  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  5  ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 3 ) L3 ¼ A0  5  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  6  ðw þ gÞ þ A0  6  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  7  ðw þ gÞ

X
N c 1

LT ¼ L0 þ fA0  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞg
916 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

Table A.2 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc for different values of Nc and l
Nc l = l0; lr = 1 Lcalc (5 mm  5 mm) − [H] Lcalc (8 mm  8 mm) − [H]
10 l0 = 1.25.66  (1e−6)H/m 1.085 lH 1.98 lH
20 l0 3.38 lH 6.48 lH
30 l0 6.21 lH 12.5 lH
60 l0 1.35 lH 34.6 lH
100 l0 10.025 lH 55.7 lH
150 l0 −1.37  1e−5H (N/A) 50.7 lH
120 l0 1.35 lH 61 lH
170 l0 −3.97  1e−5H (N/A) 33 lH
200 l0 −1.0582  1e−4H (N/A) NaN
220 l0 −1.7096  1e−4H (N/A) −1.9  1e−5H (N/A)
250 l0 −3.059  1e−4H (N/A) −9.19  1e−5H (N/A)
Nc l = lr  l0; lr = 450 Lcalc (5 mm  5 mm) − [H] Lcalc (8 mm  8) − [H]
10 565.47  (1e−6)H/m 0.48 mH 0.89 mH
20 565.47  (1e−6)H/m 1.5 mH 2.9 mH
30 565.47  (1e−6)H/m 2.8 mH 5.7 mH
60 565.47  (1e−6)H/m 6.1 mH 15.6 mH
100 565.47  (1e−6)H/m 4.5 mH 26 mH
150 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.0062 N/A 22.8 mH
120 565.47  (1e−6)H/m 0.611 mH 27.5 mH
170 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.0179 N/A 14.9 mH
200 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.0476 N/A NaN
220 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.0769 N/A −0.0088 N/A
250 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.1377 N/A −0.0414 N/A

Fig. A.3 RFID rectangular spiral antenna overall parameters


Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 917
X
Nc 1

fA0  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞg
NX
C 1

¼ f2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  8  k  ðw þ gÞg
k¼1
NX
C 1

¼2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ  4  k  ðw þ gÞg


k¼1
NX
C 1

¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðNC  1Þ  2  ½4  k  ðw þ gÞ


k¼1
NX
C 1 NX
C 1

¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðNC  1Þ  8  ðw þ gÞ  k; k ¼ NC  1
k¼1 k¼1

X
N c 1

fA0  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞg
¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðNC  1Þ  8  ðw þ gÞ  ðNC  1Þ
¼ 2  ðNC  1Þ  ½A0 þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ

LT ¼ L0 þ 2  ðNC  1Þ  ½A0 þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ ¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ


 ðw þ gÞ þ 2  ðNC  1Þ
 ½A0 þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðw þ gÞ þ 2  ðNC  1Þ  ðA0 þ B0 Þ
 8  ðNC  1Þ  ðw þ gÞ
¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC  1Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½1 þ 8  ðNC  1Þ
¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  NC
 ðw þ gÞ  ð8  NC  7Þ

Final result:

LT ¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  NC  ðw þ gÞ  ð8  NC  7Þ

LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðw þ gÞ þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  NC  ðw þ gÞ  ð8  NC  7Þ
LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½1 þ 8  NC  7
LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½8  NC  6
LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3
LT ¼ 2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3g
918 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna:

LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2

LT—total length of the wire. r—Conductivity of the wire (m X/m).


S—Cross section area p  a2 . a—radius of the wire.

LT LT 2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
rS rpa 2 r  p  a2
6
A0 þ B0 ¼ 0:01 m; NC ¼ 30; w þ g ¼ 40  10 ) LT ¼ 0:6106 m ¼ 61:06 cm

Cross section area

S ¼ 20 lm  20 lm ¼ 400  1012 m2

Conductivity of Silver r ¼ 6:1  107 ðf mÞ. Conductivity has SI units of


Siemens per meter (S/m).

rsilver@20  C ¼ 6:3  107 ðS/mÞ:

The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm  x.

0:6106
\10 ) x [ 4:846  105 m ¼ 48:46 lm; RDC@t¼20 lm
6:3  107  20  106  x
¼ 24:23 X

Actually the track is a mixture of silver then the conductivity is half of silver
conductivity.

rsilver@20  C 6:3  107 ðS=mÞ


¼ ¼ 3:15  107 ðS=mÞ;
2 2
RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 48:46 X:
0:6106
\10 ) x [ 9:6921  105 m ¼ 96:92 lm
3:15  107  20  106  x

Conclusion: In case of pure silver track. The track depth needs to be bigger than
48.46 lm to meet inductance resistance less than 10 X. In case of mixture of silver
then track depth needs to be bigger than 96.92 lm.
Part B: Analysis for l = lr  l0 (lr = 100, 200, 300) (Table A.3).
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 919

Results: The most close inductance analysis to 2.66 mH is 2.7 mH and subcases
Result B.1: Lcalc = 2.7 mH, Nc = 60, (A0 = 7 mm)  (B0 = 7 mm); l = lr
l0; lr = 100
l = 125.66  (1e−6)H/m.
The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna:

LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2

LT—total length of the wire. r—Conductivity of the wire (m X/m).


S—Cross section area p  a2 . a—radius of the wire.

LT LT 2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2 r  p  a2
6
A0 þ B0 ¼ 0:014 m; NC ¼ 60; w þ g ¼ 40  10 ) LT ¼ 1:689 m

Cross section area S ¼ 20 lm  20 lm ¼ 400  1012 m2


Conductivity of Silver r ¼ 6:1  107 ðf=mÞ. Conductivity has SI units of
Siemens per meter (S/m).

rsilver@20  C ¼ 6:3  107 ðS=mÞ:

The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm  x.

1:689
\10 ) x [ 1:3405  104 m ¼ 134:05lm;
6:3  107  20  106  x
RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 67 X

Actually the track is a mixture of silver then the conductivity is half of silver
conductivity.

rsilver@20  C 6:3  107 ðS=mÞ 1:6890


¼ ¼ 3:15  107 ðS=mÞ: \10
2 2 3:15  107  20  106  x
) x [ 2:681  104 m ¼ 268:1 lm; RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 134 X

Result B.2: Lcalc= 2.7 mH, Nc = 60, (A0 = 5 mm)  (B0 = 5 mm); l = lr  l0;
lr = 200
l = 251.32  (1e−6)H/m.
Table A.3 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc for different values of Nc and l and tag overall dimension
920

Nc l = lr  l0; lr = 100 Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc (7 mm  7 mm) − [H] Lcalc


l = 125.66(1e−6)H/m (5 mm  5 mm) − [H] (6 mm  6 mm) − [H] (8 mm  8 mm) − [H]
10 125.66  (1e−6)H/m 1.085  10−4 1.377  10−4 1.677  10−4 1.986  10−4
20 125.66  (1e−6)H/m 3.3837  10−4 4.384  10−4 5.4196  10−4 6.4831  10−4
30 125.66  (1e−6)H/m 6.2129  10−4 8.2571  10−4 0.001 0.0013
60 125.66  (1e−6)H/m 0.0014 0.002 0.0027 = 2.7 mH 0.0035
100 125.66  (1e−6)H/m 0.001 0.0024 0.0041 0.0058
150 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0014 NaN 0.0021 0.0051
120 125.66  (1e−6)H/m 1.3598  10−4 0.0018 0.0038 0.0061
170 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0040 −0.0012 2.5454  10−4 0.0033
200 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0106 −0.0062 −0.0023 NaN
220 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0171 −0.0115 −0.0063 −0.0020
250 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0306 −0.023 −0.0158 −0.0092
Nc l = lr  l0; lr = 200 Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc (7  7 mm) − [H] Lcalc (8  8 mm) − [H]
l = 251.32(1e−6)H/m (5 mm  5 mm) − [H] (6 mm  6 mm) − [H]
10 251.32  (1e−6)H/m 2.17  10−4 2.7539  10−4 3.3553  10−4 3.9719  10−4
20 251.32  (1e−6)H/m 6.7674  10−4 8.7693  10−4 0.0011 0.0013
30 251.32  (1e−6)H/m 0.0012 0.0017 0.0021 0.0025
60 251.32  (1e−6)H/m 0.0027 = 2.7 mH 0.004 0.0055 0.0069
100 251.32  (1e−6)H/m 0.0020 0.0049 0.0081 0.0116
150 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.0028 NaN 0.0042 0.0102
120 251.32  (1e−6)H/m 2.7196  10−4 0.0035 0.0077 0.0122
170 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.008 −0.0025 5.09  10−4 0.0066
200 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.0212 −0.0123 −0.0046 NaN
220 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.0342 −0.0229 −0.0127 −0.0039
250 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.0612 −0.046 −0.0316 −0.0184
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
Table A.3 (continued)
Nc l = lr  l0; lr = 300 Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc
l = 376.98  (1e−6) (5 mm  5 mm) − [H] (6 mm  6 mm) − [H] (7 mm  7 mm) − [H] (8 mm  8 mm) − [H]
H/m
10 376.98  (1e−6)H/m 3.2562  10−4 4.1309  10−4 5.0329  10−4 5.9579  10−4
20 376.98  (1e−6)H/m 0.001 0.0013 0.0016 0.0019
30 376.98  (1e−6)H/m 0.0019 0.0025 0.0031 0.0038
60 376.98  (1e−6)H/m 0.0041 0.0061 0.0082 0.0104
100 376.98  (1e−6)H/m 0.003 0.0073 0.0122 0.0173
150 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.0041 NaN 0.0062 0.0153
120 376.98  (1e−6)H/m 4.0794  10−4 0.0053 0.0115 0.0183
170 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.0119 −0.0037 7.6362  10−4 0.0099
200 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.0317 −0.0185 −0.0069 NaN
220 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.0513 −0.0344 −0.0190 −0.0059
250 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.0918 −0.069 −0.0474 −0.0276
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
921
922 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna:

LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2

LT—total length of the wire. r—Conductivity of the wire (m X/m).


S—Cross section area p  a2 . a—radius of the wire.

LT LT 2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2 r  p  a2
A0 þ B0 ¼ 0:01 m; NC ¼ 60; w þ g ¼ 40  106 ) LT ¼ 1:201 m

Cross section area

S ¼ 20 lm  20 lm ¼ 400  1012 m2

Conductivity of Silver r ¼ 6:1  107 ðf=mÞ. Conductivity has SI units of


Siemens per meter (S/m).

rsilver@20  C ¼ 6:3  107 ðS=mÞ:

The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm  x.

1:201
\10 ) x [ 9:5317  105 m ¼ 95:317lm; RDC@t¼20 lm
6:3  107 20  106  x
¼ 47:65 X

Actually the track is a mixture of silver then the conductivity is half of silver
conductivity.

rsilver@20  C 6:3  107 ðS/mÞ


¼ ¼ 3:15  107 ðS/mÞ:
2 2
1:201
\10 ) x [ 19:06  105 m ¼ 190:6 lm;
3:15  10  20  106  x
7

RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 95:30 X
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 923

A.2 LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Two Rectangular


Spiral Antennas Design Analysis

We have RFID Antenna system on a substrate, width 300 lm and lr = 100… 450.
The construction is made from two rectangular spiral antennas, the first rectangular
spiral antenna is on the other rectangular spiral antenna (Symmetric or antisymmetric
structure, mirror picture). We consider the symmetric structure for our calculation.
Each antenna is constructed from silver ointment which his resistance is bigger than
pure silver by 50 %. The track width is 20 lm, gap between tracks 20 lm, track
depth is 20 lm up to 100 lm. The requested antennas total inductance is 2.66 mH
and parasitic resistance less than 10 X. Both rectangular spiral antennas are in series.
We need to find the number of rectangular spiral antenna’s turn (Nc). We consider
that the first and second spiral antennas have the same number of turns
(Nc1 = Nc2 = Nc). Since the RFID antenna substrate permeability is between 100
and 450 (lr = 100… 450), RFID antenna permeability is an average value between
air permeability and the magnet. We consider that the TAG permeability is 100–300
(lr). Possible Antennas dimensions: 2 mm  2 mm, 3 mm  3 mm, 4 mm  4
mm, and permeability 100, 200, 300, 450 (lr). We neglect micro strip parasitic
resistance (Fig. A.4).
Double rectangular spiral antennas can be represented as a two inductors in
series (Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2), parasitic resistances (RDC-1 and RDC-2) and micro strip
(neglect parasitic resistance). The rectangular spiral antennas in series are connected
in parallel to RFID TAG IC. The Equivalent Circuit of Passive RFID TAG with
double rectangular antennas is Capacitor (C1) and Resistor (R1) in parallel with
double rectangular antennas in the series (Fig. A.5).
Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2 are mostly formed by traces on planar PCB. 2  Lm element
represents the mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2. Since two inductors
(Lcalc-1, Lcalc-2) are in series and there is a mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and
Lcalc-2, the total antenna inductance LT: LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm and
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 . Lm is the mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2.

A01 A02
Micro-strip

B02 B02

w1 g1 RFID IC w2 g2

Fig. A.4 RFID rectangular spiral antennas system


924 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

Fig. A.5 Double rectangular spiral antennas in series with RFID TAG IC equivalent circuit

K is the coupling coefficient of two inductors 0  K  1. We do our analysis for


K = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7. We consider for simplicity that two rectangular spiral antennas
are identical (same parameter values).
Part A: Analysis for l = l0 and l = lr  l0 (lr = 450).

H H l
l0 ¼ 4  p  107  1:2566  106 ; lr ¼
m m l0
) l ¼ lr  l0 jlr ¼450 ¼ 450  1:2566  106 ¼ 565:47  106

ðt þ wÞ ð20lm þ 20lmÞ
t ¼ g ¼ 20lm ) d ¼ 2  ¼2 ¼ 25:47lm; t ¼ 20 lm
P 3:14

d—Equivalent diameter of the track (Fig. A.6)

Aavg ¼ A0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ ¼ 0:005  Nc  ð20 lm þ 20 lmÞ ¼ 0:005  Nc  40 lm ¼ 0:005  Nc  40  106


Bavg ¼ A0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ ¼ 0:005  Nc  ð20 lm þ 20 lmÞ ¼ 0:005  Nc  40 lm ¼ 0:005  Nc  40  106

d ¼ 2  ðt þ wÞ=p; Aavg ¼ a0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ; Bavg ¼ b0  Nc  ðg þ wÞ


Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 925

Fig. A.6 RFID rectangular spiral antenna overall parameters

A0, B0—Overall dimensions of the coil. Aavg, Bavg—Average dimensions of


the coil. t—Track thickness, w—Track width, g—Gap between tracks. Nc—
Number of turns, d—Equivalent diameter of the track. Average coil area;
Ac = Aavg  Bavg. Integrating all those parameters give the equations for induc-
tance calculation:
2 3 2 3
6 2  Aavg  Bavg 7 6 2  Aavg  Bavg 7
X1 ¼ Aavg  ln4 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi5; X2 ¼ Bavg  ln4 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi5
d  ðAavg þ A2avg þ B2avg d  ðBavg þ A2avg þ B2avg
h qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffii ðAavg þ Bavg Þ
X3 ¼ 2  Aavg þ Bavg  A2avg þ B2avg ; X4 ¼
4

The RFID’s coil calculation inductance expression is


hl i
Lcalc ¼ 0
 ðX1 þ X2  X3 þ X4 Þ  Ncp ; L1 ¼ Lcalc
p

Definition of limits, Estimations: Track thickness t, Al and Cu coils (t > 30 lm).


The printed coils as high as possible. Estimation of turn exponent p is needed for
inductance calculation (Table A.4).
We integrate the Lcalc value inside the differential equations which characterize
the RFID system with the Coil inductance. Nc ! z; A0 ! x; B0 ! y
MATLABScript: z = 10; x = 0.005 – z * 40 * (1e−6); y = 0.005 – z * 40 *
(1e−6); x1 = x * log(2 * x * y/(25.47 * (1e−6) * (x + sqrt(x * x + y * y))));
x2 = y * log(2 * x * y/(25.47 * (1e−6) * (y + sqrt(x * x + y * y)))); x3 = 2 *
(x + y − sqrt(x * x + y * y)); x4 = (x + y)/4; l = ((1.2566 * (1e−6)/3.14) *
(x1 + x2 − x3 + x4) * power(z,1.8))
926 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

The results in Tables A.5, A.6, A.7, A.8, A.9, A.10, A.11, A.12 and A.13).
Rectangular spiral RFID antenna length calculation & resistance
We have the following rectangular spiral RFID antenna and first we need to
calculate the total length (Fig. A.7).

Table A.4 RFID coil manufacturing technology (wired, etched, printed)


Coil manufacturing technology P
Wired 1.8–1.9
Etched 1.75–1.85
Printed 1.7–1.8

Table A.5 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc for different values of Nc and l and tag overall dimension
Nc l = l0; lr = 1 Lcalc (2 mm  2 mm) − [H] Lcalc (3 mm  3 mm) − [H] Lcalc (4 mm  4 mm) − [H]
10 l0 = 1.2566  (1e−6)H/m 2.922  10−7 5.3857  10−7 8.048  10−7
20 l0 7.0241  10−7 1.5222  10−6 2.425  10−6
30 l0 8.532  10−7 2.45  10−6 4.266  10−6
60 l0 −5.916  10−7 2.009  10−6 7.351  10−6
−7 −6
100 l0 −1.767  10 −6.6295  10 NaN
150 l0 −9.167  10−5 −6.3052  10−5 −3.6674  10−5
120 l0 −3.8527  10−5 −2.1249  10−5 −6.573  10−5
170 l0 −1.45  10−4 −1.074  10−4 −7.2119  10−5
200 l0 −2.577  10−4 −2.047  10−4 −1.538  10−4
220 l0 −3.58  10−4 −2.932  10−4 −2.3072  10−4
250 l0 −5.5179  10−4 −4.673  10−4 −3.8522  10−4
Nc l = lr  l0; lr = 450 Lcalc (2 mm  2 mm) − [H] Lcalc (3 mm  3) − [H] Lcalc (4 mm  4 mm) − [H]
10 565.47  (1e−6)H/m 1.3149  10−4 2.4236  10−4 3.621  10−4
20 565.47  (1e−6)H/m 3.1608  10−4 6.85  10−4 0.0011
30 565.47  (1e−6)H/m 3.8394  10−4 0.0011 0.0019
60 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −2.6625  10−4 9.04  10−4 0.0033
100 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.008 −0.003 NaN
150 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.0413 −0.0284 −0.0165
120 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.0173 −0.0096 −0.003
170 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.0653 −0.0484 −0.0325
200 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.116 −0.0921 −0.0692
220 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.1611 −0.132 −0.1038
250 565.47  (1e−6)H/m −0.2483 −0.2103 −0.1734

Table A.6 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 450 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(2 mm  2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
10 1.3149  10−4 3.9447  10−5 3.4187  10−4
−4 −5
20 3.1608  10 9.4824  10 8.218  10−4
−4 −4
30 3.8394  10 1.1518  10 9.9824  10−4
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 927

Table A.7 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
(2 mm  2 mm) − [H]
10 1.3149  10−4 6.574  10−5 3.9447  10−4
20 3.1608  10  10−4 1.58  10−4 9.482  10−4
−4 −4
30 3.8394  10 1.9197  10 0.0012

Table A.8 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 450 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(2 mm  2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
10 1.3149  10−4 9.2043  10−5 4.47  10−4
20 3.1608  10−4 2.212  10−4 0.0011
30 3.8394  10−4 2.6876  10−4 0.0013

Table A.9 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (3 mm  3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
(3 mm  3 mm) − [H]
10 2.4236  10−4 7.2708  10−5 6.3014  10−4
−4 −4
20 6.85  10 2.055  10 0.0018
30 0.0011 0.0033 0.0029 = 2.9 mH
60 9.04  10−4 2.712  10−4 0.0024 = 2.4 mH

Table A.10 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (3 mm  3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l= lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
(3 mm  3 mm) − [H]
10 2.4236  10−4 1.2118  10−4 7.27  10−4
−4 −4
20 6.85  10 3.425  10 0.0021 = 2.1 mH
30 0.0011 5.5  10−4 0.0033
−4 −4
60 9.04  10 4.52  10 0.0027 = 2.7 mH

A0, B0—Overall dimensions of the coil. Aavg, Bavg—Average dimensions of


the coil. w—Track width, g—Gap between tracks. Nc—Number of turns. L0 is the
length of the first turn L0 ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðw þ gÞ. Lk is the length of turn k + 1.
928 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

Table A.11 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (3 mm  3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
(3 mm  3 mm) − [H]
10 2.4236  10−4 1.6965  10−4 8.24  10−4
20 6.85  10−4 4.795  10−4 0.0023 = 2.3 mH
−4
30 0.0011 7.7  10 0.0037
60 9.04  10−4 6.328  10−4 0.0031

Table A.12 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3, 0.5 (4 mm  4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H]
10 3.621  10−4 1.0863  10−4 9.4146  10−4
20 0.0011 0.0033 0.0029 = 2.9 mH
30 0.0019 5.7  10−4 0.0049
60 0.0033 9.9  10−4 0.0086
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 450 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
10 3.621  10−4 1.8105  10−4 0.0011
20 0.0011 5.5  10−4 0.0033
30 0.0019 9.5  10−4 0.0057
60 0.0033 0.0017 0.0099

Table A.13 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (4 mm  4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H]
10 3.621  10−4 2.5347  10−4 0.0012
20 0.0011 7.7  10−4 0.0037
30 0.0019 0.0013 0.0065
60 0.0033 0.0023 0.0112
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 929

Fig. A.7 RFID rectangular spiral antenna overall parameters

k ¼ 1 ) L1 ¼ A0  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  2  ðw þ gÞ þ A0  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  3  ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 2 ) L2 ¼ A0  3  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ þ A0  4  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  5  ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 3 ) L3 ¼ A0  5  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  6  ðw þ gÞ þ A0  6  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  7  ðw þ gÞ

X
N c 1

LT ¼ L0 þ fA0  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞg

X
N c 1

fA0  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞg
NX
C 1

¼ f2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  8  k  ðw þ gÞg
k¼1
NX
C 1

¼2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ  4  k  ðw þ gÞg ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðNC  1Þ


k¼1
NX
C 1

2 ½4  k  ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
NX
C 1 NX
C 1

¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðNC  1Þ  8  ðw þ gÞ  k; k ¼ NC  1
k¼1 k¼1
930 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

X
N c 1

fA0  ½1 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0  ½2 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ þ B0  ½3 þ ðk  1Þ  2  ðw þ gÞg
¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðNC  1Þ  8  ðw þ gÞ  ðNC  1Þ
¼ 2  ðNC  1Þ  ½A0 þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ

LT ¼ L0 þ 2  ðNC  1Þ  ½A0 þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ ¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ


 ðw þ gÞ þ 2  ðNC  1Þ
 ½A0 þ B0  4  ðw þ gÞ ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðw þ gÞ
þ 2  ðNC  1Þ  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  8  ðNC  1Þ  ðw þ gÞ
¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC  1Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½1 þ 8  ðNC  1Þ
¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  NC  ðw þ gÞ  ð8  NC  7Þ

Final result:

LT ¼ L0 þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  NC  ðw þ gÞ  ð8  NC  7Þ

LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ðw þ gÞ þ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  NC  ðw þ gÞ  ð8  NC  7Þ
LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½1 þ 8  NC  7
LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½8  NC  6
LT ¼ 2  ðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  2  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3
LT ¼ 2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3g

The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna:

LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2

LT—total length of the wire. r—Conductivity of the wire (m X/m).


S—Cross section area p  a2 . a—radius of the wire.

LT LT 2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2 r  p  a2
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 931

A0 þ B0 ¼ TBD; NC ¼ TBD; w þ g ¼ 40  106 ) LT ¼ TBD

To be define—value which need to be chosen according analysis results.


Cross section area

S ¼ 20 lm  20 lm ¼ 400  1012 m2

Conductivity of Silver r ¼ 6:1  107 ðf=mÞ. Conductivity has SI units of


Siemens per meter (S/m).

rsilver@20  C ¼ 6:3  107 ðS/mÞ:

The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm  x.
Part B: Analysis for l = lr  l0 (lr = 100, 200, 300) (Tables A.14, A.15, A.16,
A.17, A.18, A.19, A.20, A.21, A.22, A.23, A.24, A.25, A.26, A.27, A.28, A.29,
A.30, A.31, A.32, A.33, A.34 and A.35).
The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna:

LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2

LT—total length of the wire. r—Conductivity of the wire (m X/m).


S—Cross section area p  a2 . a—radius of the wire.

LT LT 2  fðA0 þ B0 Þ  ð1 þ NC Þ  ðw þ gÞ  ½4  NC  3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
r  S r  p  a2 r  p  a2
A0 þ B0 ¼ TBD; NC ¼ TBD; w þ g ¼ 40  106 ) LT ¼ TBD

Cross section area

S ¼ 20 lm  20 lm ¼ 400  1012 m2
Table A.14 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc for different values of Nc and l and tag overall
932

Nc l = lr  l0; lr = 100 l = 125.66  (1e-6)H/m Lcalc (2 mm  2 mm) − [H] Lcalc (3 mm  3 mm) − [H] Lcalc (4 mm  4 mm) − [H]
10 125.66  (1e−6)H/m 2.922  10−5 5.3857  10−5 8.0487  10−5
20 125.66  (1e−6)H/m 7.0241  10−5 1.5222  10−4 2.425  10−4
−5 −4
30 125.66  (1e−6)H/m 8.532  10 2.4523  10 4.266  10−4
−5 −4
60 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −5.9168  10 2.009  10 7.351  10−4
−4
100 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0018 −6.629  10 NaN
150 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0092 −0.0063 −0.0037
120 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0039 −0.0021 −6.573  10−4
170 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0145 −0.0107 −0.0072
200 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0258 −0.0205 −0.0154
220 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0358 −0.0293 −0.0231
250 125.66  (1e−6)H/m −0.0552 −0.0467 −0.0385
Nc l = lr l0; lr = 200 l = 251.32  (1e−6)H/m Lcalc (2 mm  2 mm) − [H] Lcalc (3 mm  3 mm) − [H] Lcalc (4 mm  4 mm) − [H]
−5 −4
10 251.32  (1e−6)H/m 5.8439  10 1.0771  10 1.6097  10−4
−4 −4
20 251.32  (1e−6)H/m 1.4048  10 3.0445  10 4.8501  10−4
−4 −4
30 251.32  (1e−6)H/m 1.7064  10 4.9045  10 8.532  10−4
−4 −4
60 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −1.1834  10 4.0179  10 0.0015
100 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.0035 −0.0013 NaN
150 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.0183 −0.0126 −0.0073
120 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.0077 −0.0042 −0.0013
170 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.029 −0.0215 −0.0144
200 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.0516 −0.0409 −0.0308
220 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.0716 −0.0587 −0.0461
250 251.32  (1e−6)H/m −0.1104 −0.0935 −0.077
(continued)
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
Table A.14 (continued)
Nc l = lr  l0; lr = 300 Lcalc (2 mm  2 mm) − [H] Lcalc (3 mm  3 mm) − [H] Lcalc (4 mm  4 mm) − [H]
l = 376.98  (1e−6)H/m
10 376.98  (1e−6)H/m 8.7659  10−5 1.6157  10−4 2.4146  10−4
−4 −4
20 376.98  (1e−6)H/m 2.1072  10 4.5667  10 7.2751  10−4
−4 −4
30 376.98  (1e−6)H/m 2.5596  10 7.3568  10 0.0013
60 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −1.775  10−4 6.0269  10−4 0.0022
100 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.0053 −0.002 NaN
150 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.0275 −0.0189 −0.011
120 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.0116 −0.0064 −0.002
170 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.0435 −0.0322 −0.0216
200 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.0773 −0.0614 −0.0462
220 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.1074 −0.088 −0.0692
250 376.98  (1e−6)H/m −0.1655 −0.1402 −0.1156
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
933
934 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

Table A.15 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
lr = 100 (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
(2 mm  2 mm) − [H]
10 2.922  10−5 8.766  10−6 7.5972  10−5
20 7.0241  10−5 2.1072  10−5 1.8263  10−4
−5 −5
30 8.532  10 2.5596  10 2.2183  10−4

Table A.16 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
lr = 100 (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
(2 mm  2 mm) − [H]
10 2.922  10−5 1.461  10−5 8.766  10−5
−5 −5
20 7.0241  10 3.5121  10 2.1072  10−4
−5 −5
30 8.532  10 4.266  10 2.5596  10−4

Table A.17 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
lr = 100 (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
(2 mm  2 mm) − [H]
10 2.922  10−5 2.0454  10−5 9.9348  10−5
−5 −5
20 7.0241  10 4.9169  10 2.3882  10−4
−5 −5
30 8.532  10 5.9724  10 2.9009  10−4

Table A.18 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (3 mm  3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
lr = 100 (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
(3 mm  3 mm) − [H]
10 5.3857  10−5 1.6157  10−5 1.4003  10−4
−4 −5
20 1.5222  10 4.5666  10 3.9577  10−4
−4 −5
30 2.4523  10 7.3569  10 6.376  10−4
−4 −5
60 2.009  10 6.027  10 5.2234  10−4
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 935

Table A.19 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (3 mm  3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc (K = 0.5) = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.5)
lr = 100 (3 mm  3 mm) − [H]
10 5.3857  10−5 2.6929  10−5 1.6157  10−4
20 1.5222  10−4 7.611  10−5 4.5666  10−4
−4 −4
30 2.4523  10 1.2262  10 7.35  10−4
−4
60 2.009  10 1.0045 6.027  10−4

Table A.20 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (3 mm  3 mm) and K = 0.3,
0.5 (4 mm  4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.7)
lr = 100 (K = 0.7)
(3 mm  3 mm) − [H]
10 5.3857  10−5 3.77  10−5 1.8311  10−4
−4 −4
20 1.5222  10 1.0655  10 5.1755  10−4
−4 −4
30 2.4523  10 1.7166  10 8.3378  10−4
−4 −4
60 2.009  10 1.4063  10 6.8306  10−4
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 100 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.3)
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3)
10 8.0487  10−5 2.4146  10−5 2.0927  10−4
−4 −5
20 2.425  10 7.275  10 6.305  10−4
−4 −4
30 4.266  10 1.2798  10 0.0011
60 7.351  10−4 2.2053  10−4 0.0019
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 100 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.5)
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H] − [H] (K = 0.5)
10 8.0487  10−5 4.0244  10−5 2.4146  10−4
−4 −4
20 2.425  10 1.2125  10 7.275  10−4
−4 −4
30 4.266  10 2.133  10 0.0013
60 7.351  10−4 3.6755  10−4 0.0022 = 2.2 mH

Table A.21 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (4 mm  4 mm) and K = 0.3,
0.5 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lr = 100 (4 mm  4 mm) − [H] Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc +
(K = 0.7) 2  Lm (K = 0.7)
10 8.0487  10−5 5.6341  10−5 2.7366  10−4
−4 −4
20 2.425  10 1.6975  10 8.245  10−4
−4 −4
30 4.266  10 2.9862  10 0.0015
60 7.351  10−4 5.1457  10−4 0.0025 = 2.5 mH
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lr = 200 (2 mm  2 mm) − [H] Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
(K = 0.3) 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.3)
10 5.8439  10−5 1.7532  10−5 1.5194  10−4
(continued)
936 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

Table A.21 (continued)


pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lr = 200 (2 mm  2 mm) − [H] Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
(K = 0.3) 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.3)
20 1.4048  10−4 4.2144  10−5 3.6525  10−4
−4 −5
30 1.7064  10 5.1192  10 4.4366  10−4
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lr = 200 (2 mm  2 mm) − [H] Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
10 5.8439  10−5 2.922  10−5 1.7532  10−4
20 1.4048  10−4 7.024  10−5 4.2144  10−4
30 1.7064  10−4 8.532  10−5 5.1192  10−4

Table A.22 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.7)
(2 mm  2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7)
10 5.8439  10−5 4.0907  10−5 1.9869  10−4
20 1.4048  10−4 9.8336  10−5 4.7763  10−4
−4 −5
30 1.7064  10 1.1945  10 5.8018  10−4

Table A.23 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (3 mm  3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.3)
(3 mm  3 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3)
10 1.0771  10−4 3.2313  10−5 2.8005  10−4
−4 −5
20 3.0445  10 9.1335  10 7.9157  10−4
−4 −4
30 4.9045  10 1.4714  10 0.0013
60 4.0179  10−4 1.2054  10−4 0.001

Table A.24 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (3 mm  3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.5)
(3 mm  3 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5)
10 1.0771  10−4 5.3855  10−5 3.2313  10−4
−4 −4
20 3.0445  10 1.5223  10 9.1335  10−4
−4 −4
30 4.9045  10 2.4523  10 0.0015
60 4.0179  10−4 2.009  10−4 0.0012
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 937

Table A.25 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (3 mm  3 mm), K = 0.3, 0.5
(4 mm  4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, l = lr  l0 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lr = 200 (3 mm  3 mm) − [H] Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.7)
(K = 0.7)
10 1.0771  10−4 7.5397  10−5 3.6621  10−4
−4 −4
20 3.0445  10 2.1312  10 0.001
30 4.9045  10−4 3.4332  10−4 0.0017
60 4.0179  10−4 2.8125  10−4 0.0014
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.3)
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3)
10 1.6097  10−4 4.8291  10−5 4.1852  10−4
−4 −4
20 4.8501  10 1.455  10 0.0013
30 8.532  10−4 2.5596  10−4 0.0022 = 2.2 mH
60 0.0015 4.5  10−4 0.0039
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2  Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm (K = 0.5)
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5)
10 1.6097  10−4 8.0485  10−5 4.8291  10−4
−4 −4
20 4.8501  10 2.425  10 0.0015
30 8.532  10−4 4.266  10−4 0.0026 = 2.6 mH
60 0.0015 7.5  10−4 0.0045

Table A.26 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (4 mm  4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
10 1.6097  10−4 1.1268  10−4 5.473  10−4
−4 −4
20 4.8501  10 3.3951  10 0.0016
30 8.532  10−4 5.9724  10−4 0.0029 = 2.9 mH
60 0.0015 0.001 0.0051

Table A.27 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(2 mm  2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
10 8.7659  10−5 2.6298  10−5 2.2791  10−4
−4 −5
20 2.1072  10 6.3216  10 5.4787  10−4
30 2.5596  10−4 7.6788  10−5 6.655  10−4
938 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

Table A.28 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(2 mm  2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
10 8.7659  10−5 4.383  10−5 2.6298  10−4
−4 −4
20 2.1072  10 1.0536  10 6.3216  10−4
−4 −4
30 2.5596  10 1.2798  10 7.6788  10−4

Table A.29 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (2 mm  2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(2 mm  2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
10 8.7659  10−5 6.1361  10−5 2.9804  10−4
−4 −4
20 2.1072  10 1.475  10 7.1645  10−4
−4 −4
30 2.5596  10 1.7917  10 8.7026  10−4

Table A.30 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (3 mm  3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(3 mm  3 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
10 1.6157  10−4 4.84  10−5 4.2008  10−4
−4 −4
20 4.5667  10 1.37  10 0.0012
30 7.3568  10−4 2.207  10−4 0.0019
60 6.0269  10−4 1.8081  10−4 0.0016

Table A.31 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (3 mm  3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(3 mm  3 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
10 1.6157  10−4 8.0785  10−5 4.847  10−4
−4 −4
20 4.5667  10 2.2834  10 0.0014
30 7.3568  10−4 3.6784  10−4 0.0022 = 2.2 mH
60 6.0269  10−4 3.0135  10−4 0.0018
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 939

Table A.32 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (3 mm  3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(3 mm  3 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
10 1.6157  10−4 1.131  10−4 5.4934  10−4
−4 −4
20 4.5667  10 3.1967  10 0.0016
30 7.3568  10−4 5.1498  10−4 0.0025 = 2.5 mH
60 6.0269  10−4 4.2188  10−4 0.002

Table A.33 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (4 mm  4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
10 2.4146  10−4 7.2438  10−5 6.278  10−4
−4 −4
20 7.2751  10 2.1825  10 0.0019
30 0.0013 3.9  10−4 0.0034
60 0.0022 6.6  10−4 0.0057

Table A.34 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (4 mm  4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc +
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5) 2  Lm (K = 0.5)
10 2.4146  10−4 1.2073  10−4 7.2438  10−4
−4 −4
20 7.2751  10 3.6376  10 0.0022 = 2.2 mH
30 0.0013 6.5  10−4 0.0039
60 0.0022 0.0011 0.0066

Table A.35 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (4 mm  4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K  Lcalc1  Lcalc2 LT=Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr  l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K  Lcalc  Lcalc ¼ K  Lcalc + 2  Lm = 2  Lcalc + 2  Lm
(4 mm  4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
10 2.4146  10−4 1.6902  10−4 8.2096  10−4
−4 −4
20 7.2751  10 5.0926  10 0.0025 = 2.5 mH
30 0.0013 9.1  10−4 0.0044
60 0.0022 0.0015 0.0075
940 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis

Conductivity of Silver r ¼ 6:1  107 ðf=mÞ. Conductivity has SI units of


Siemens per meter (S/m).

rsilver@20  C ¼ 6:3  107 ðS/mÞ:

The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm  x.
Appendix B
RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics
and Design Methods

B.1 Amplifier Design Concepts and Matching Guidelines

An amplifier is an active device that has the ability to amplify voltage, current and
amplify both voltage and current. There are some types of amplifiers. Amplifiers
types: zero frequency amplifiers (DC amplifiers), low frequency amplifiers (Audio
amplifiers), and high frequency amplifiers (RF amplifiers). Power is P = V  I,
when current (I) or voltage (V) is raising and will create amplification. The main
desirable specification when designing amplifier: High P1dB (high input power that
cause the UUT gain to drop by 1dB from small signal value). P1dB (IP1dB,
OP1dB), low noise (example LNA), and maximum efficiency (Efficiency (P.E
%) = [output signal power]/[power supply power]). High Gain (S21), b2 is output
signal power, a1 is input signal power S21 = b2/a1 for a2 = 0 (no input signal at
amplifier output). Good return loss (RL). S11 (IRL) ! e and (ORL) ! 1. Return
Loss = Reflection Loss. Amplifiers come in three flavors: Common Base
(CB) amplifiers, Common Collector (CC) amplifiers, and Common Emitter (CE)
amplifiers. It depends whether the base, collector or emitter is common to both the
input and output of the amplifier. Common Base (CB) amplifier, input signal
inserted at emitter (E) and output signal taken from the collector (C). The CB
amplifier can operate as a voltage amplifier for low input impedance circuits.

Fig. B.1 Common base (CB)


amplifier Rfin (E) Rfout (C)
CB Amplifier

(B)

VIN (t) IE VRE


0 degree phase shift

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 941


O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6
942 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Cin, Cout are DC


block capacitors

Fig. B.2 Common base (CB) amplifier schematic

CB amplifier can be found at the 50 X antenna input of the radio receiver (Figs. B.1
and B.2).
There is a JFET’s CB amplifier circuit which can be used in receiver’s IF unit.
C2, C3, R2 and RFC (RF choke) are for decoupling. C4, C6 are RF decoupling. C5 is
for flatter frequency response throughout its pass band. T1 is for impedance
matching (Fig. B.3).

Fig. B.3 jfet common gate amplifier


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 943

There is a JFET’s CB amplifier circuit which can be used in receiver’s IF unit.


C2, C3, R2 and RFC (RF choke) are for decoupling. C5 is for flatter frequency
response throughout its pass band. T1 is for impedance matching. The most popular
amplifier circuit is Common Emitter (CE). The CE amplifier has a greater current
gain and voltage gain combination than any other type. CE amplifier make excellent

Rfin (B) Rfout (C)


CE Amplifier

(E)

Fig. B.4 Common Emitter (CE) amplifier

Fig. B.5 Common emitter (CE) amplifier schematic


944 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.6 Input to output Input to


180 deg & 0GHz
phase (deg) versus frequency Output
(GHz) phase 6 GHz & 0 deg
(deg)

Frequency (GHz)

power amplifier. The Common Emitter (CE) amplifier, input signal inserted at base
(B) and output signal taken from the collector (C). The CE amplifier’s output
voltage is shifted by *180° in phase compared to CE amplifier’s input signal
(Figs. B.4 and B.5).
At RF frequencies there is an effect of “positive feedback”, which creates
amplifier instability and oscillation. “positive feedback” is when there is internal
feedback capacitance between transistor’s collector and its base. It cause to unde-
sired CE oscillations. Inter feedback capacitance can be as high as 25 pF or higher.
At a specific frequency this capacitance will send an in phase signal back into the
base input from the collector’s output. This back in phase signal creates “oscillator”.
Transistor’s internal resistance and capacitance along with other phase delays yield a
powerful phase shift to normally out of phase 180° feedback signal. Only phase
delays that are at a total 360° (0°) will bring amplifier instability and oscillations.
A phase = g(frequency) for a typical CE amplifier unmatched (Fig. B.6).
The Common Collector (CC) amplifier (emitter follower amplifier) has the input
signal inserted into the base, and output signal from emitter. The CC amplifier has
current and power gain, voltage gain less than one (GV < 1). The CC amplifier’s
used as a buffer or active impedance matching circuit. The CC amplifier has high
input impedance and low output impedance. There is no phase inversion between
CC amplifier’s input and output (Figs. B.7 and B.8).

Rfin (B) Rfout (E)


CC Amplifier

(C)

VIN (t) IE VRE


0 degree phase shift
Fig. B.7 Common collector (CC) amplifier
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 945

VIN (t) IE VRE


0 degree phase shift

Fig. B.8 Common Collector (CC) amplifier schematic

When an amplifier’s output impedance matches the load impedance, maximum


power is transferred to the load (RS = RL). When an amplifier’s output impedance
matches the load impedance (RS = RL) all reflections are eliminated. When an
amplifier’s output impedance (RS) unmatched the load impedance (RL), there are
reflections and less than maximum power is transferred to the load RL. The
amplifier’s efficiency in its DC case is defined by (Fig. B.9 and Table B.1).
 
Rload
EFFð%Þ ¼  100 %:
Rload þ Rsource
2 3
2 3 Point of max ðDCÞ
Point of max 6 amplifier efficiency 7
6 7
4 Power transfer 5 6¼ 6 EFFð%Þ ! 100 % 7
6 7
RL ¼ RS 4 RL RS ðRS !eÞ 5
RL ! 1

In order to develop maximum power the Zout of the amplifier must be complex
conjugate of the Zin of the load. The low efficiency (EFF%) level can be increased if
the load has a higher input resistance, thus dropping more power across the load
946 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.9 Amplifier’s output impedance matches the load impedance

Table B.1 Amplifier’s conditions and power across the load


Condition Voltage or current on Power across the load Current or voltage drawn
the load from Amplifier’s power
supply
RL ! e VOUT ¼ VL ! e pL ¼ 0 Load DC current = Vcc/Rs
RL ¼ 0 VL ¼ 0 POUT ¼ PL ! e (maximum DC power)
(Short
load)
RL ! ∞ IL ! e pL = 0 Load DC voltage = Vcc
(No load) IL ¼ 0 but lload = 0
RL = RS
IL ¼
Vcc
j POUT ¼ PL ! e Load DC voltage = Vcc/2
(max RS þ RL RS ¼RL V2cc
Load DC current = Vcc/
power Vcc Vcc PL ¼ I2L  RL ¼ (Rsource + Rload)
transfer) ¼ ¼ 4  RL
2  RS 2  RL

(Zload Zout). The total output power across load will be less in this condition
(Zload Zout) than if Zload = Zout (pure resistive). The transfer of maximum power
from the source to the load will not maximize efficiency (EEF%). Maximum power
transfer only occurs when the source impedance equals the load impedance
Zload = Zout (pure resistive). Any impedance mismatches will end in a loss of
power, Mismatch Loss (ML). ML(dB) = Mismatch Loss. VSWR = Voltage Stand
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 947

Fig. B.10 Amplifier’s Zout


and load

VSWR1 2
½1ðVSWR þ 1Þ
Wave Ratio (dimensionless units). ML ¼ 10  log10 ; Mismatch Loss
(ML) (Fig. B.10).
2 n o 32
1 þ jC j
1
41ðn 1jCj
o Þ5

 
1 þ jCj
½ VSWR1 2
1ðVSWR þ 1Þ
1jCj
þ1
ML ¼ 10  log10  ¼ 10  log10
1 þ jC j
VSWR¼ 1jCj
2 n o 32
2jCj
41ðn 1jCj
oÞ5
2
1jCj ½1jCj2
ML = 10  log10 ¼ ML ¼ 10  log10

Good amplifier match (C = 0), no reflections then VSWR = 1; ML = 10  log


(1) = 0. Bad amplifier match (C = 1), all power is reflected then VSWR ! ∞;
10  log(0) = −∞.
Amplifier matching allows: amplifier maximum power transfer and attenuation
of harmonics to be achieved between stages. RF matching network able and
facilitate impedance matching and filtering of signal, coupling between RF stages.
The amplifier matching networks types are L matching network, T matching net-
work, and PI matching network. In design of microwave matching network the
device parasitic and the effect of length on RF circuit matching are very important.
L matching network: LC matching topology which especially for narrowband
impedance matching. The L network name is due to its L shape and can furnish low
pass filtering to decrease harmonic output. Two stages (amplifier, and load) with no
matching network. Two stages (amplifier, load) with simple low pass L network
between stages. Low pass L network can matches a higher output impedance source
(Zhigh) to a lower input impedance load (Zlow). Low pass L network can match also
a lower output impedance source (Zlow) to a higher input impedance load (Zhigh)
(Fig. B.11).

Fig. B.11 Amplifier (source) Poor


and load poor match Amplifier
(source)
Load
Zlow Zhigh
948 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Perfect
match

Fig. B.12 High to low impedance matching L network

Figure B.12 is a high to low (Zhigh ! Zlow) impedance matching L network


between two amplifiers.
Figure B.13 is a low to high (Zlow ! Zhigh) impedance matching L network
between two amplifiers.
A T matching network is a popular impedance matching network circuit. It can
furnish almost any impedance matching level between two stages and we can
selectable loaded Q (Fig. B.14).
A PI matching network can be applicable to many matching applications all
types. We can alter the ratio between capacitors C1 and C2 in the next figure so the
output impedance of the load can be matched to the source impedance. PI network
also decreasing the harmonic output (Figs. B.15 and B.16).
PI network’s topology is a low pass filter. It has a small resonant band pass like
S21 gain pick and excellent return loss S11 at specific frequency (Fig. B.17).
It is very important in any microwave matching circuit first that device parasitic
are part of any active or passive component and second the effect that length has a

Perfect
match

Fig. B.13 Low to high impedance matching L network


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 949

Fig. B.14 Impedance matching T network

Fig. B.15 PI impedance matching network

Fig. B.16 PI impedance matching network


950 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Low pass
response

Resonant
Peak (S21)

Fig. B.17 PI network’s topology as a low pass filter

RF circuit matching. There are vital components parasitic effects. Effect that length:
PCB trace and pad reactance (j  X elements), and strong influence of circuit length.
In low frequency we can ignore effect of length. In low frequency we not consider
PCB parasitic effects and distance between each matching component and
source/load. At higher RF frequencies the distance between components and cir-
cuits is very critical. The distance affects the moving wave’s wavelengths and the
expected performance of the matching network. It is very important where the
circuit and individual components are located on PCB. Any mismatched line that is
a significant portion of a wavelength, the impedance will vary along that line. The
variations on a mismatched line are due to the standing wave (SWR). The reflected
RF wave is bouncing off of the mismatch load and interacting with forward wave.
The interaction between reflected and forward waves, creating fixed peaks and
valley of voltage and current. The fixed peaks and valleys of voltage and current are
created at every half wavelength (k/2) along the trace. The distance between each
circuit element is varied; this distance will completely destroy any predicted RF
match. Figure B.18 describes the voltage and current standing waves on a mis-
matched transmission line.
First the match is calculated with zero micro-strip length and second the cal-
culated match will degrade with micro-strip length. We must take into consideration
the micro-strips length effects in our impedance matching calculation (Fig. B.19).

Fig. B.18 Current and volt- Amplitude Current Voltage


age signal amplitudes versus
wavelength

Wavelength
λ/2
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 951

Fig. B.19 Amplifier and load, matching network with microstrips

B.2 Amplifier Distortion and Noise Products

There are two unavoidable and undesirable elements of any electronic circuits: dis-
tortion and noise. Distortion can deform the carrier and its sidebands at the transmitter
and receiver. Distortion causes to spectral regrowth and adjacent channel interface.
Additionally distortion causes faulty, distorted replica of the original baseband sig-
nal, and increasing the Bit Error Rate (BER). Noise degrades all important BER of
the entire system. Distortion forms frequencies inter modulation products. Distortion
frequency inter-modulation is cause by internal nonlinear mixing of any signal with
one or more other signals, mixing with other signals, and modulated or unmodulated
waveform that is altered is shape or amplitude from the original signal (improper
circuit response). The distortion types are frequency distortion, amplitude and phase
distortion, inter-modulation distortion, second order inter modulation distortion,
harmonic distortion and noise. Frequency distortion happened when passive or active
circuit increases or decreases the amplitude of particular frequencies differently than
the other frequencies. Frequency distortion is a common problem wide band IF or RF
amplifiers. The frequency limitations of amplifiers have many causes. The reasons
for frequency limitation of amplitudes are active device’s transit time, negative

Fig. B.20 Input signal and resultant output signal


952 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

effects of junction capacitance, reactive nature of the transistor’s matching, filtering


and coupling, and decoupling networks (highly frequency dependent and act like a
filter, band-pass, high-pass, etc.,). The frequency distortion due to harmonic is pre-
sented in Fig. B.20.
The amplitude distortion is a form of nonlinear distortion (nonlinear behaviour).
It is produced by the incorrect biasing of an amplifier. It cause to either saturation or
cut-off of the transistor and generates harmonics and IMD products. Overdriving
the input of the amplifier (overload distortion) will create this same effect (flat
topping). Overdriving the input of the amplifier is not depending on amplifier’s
bias. The harmonics and IMDs generated will produce interference to other ser-
vices. The harmonics and IMDs generated will produce interference to adjacent
channels. It will increase the system BER (Bit Error Rate) in a digital data radio.
The voice band device will have an output signal with a harsh, coarse output. The
amplitude distortion due to incorrect biasing is described in Fig. B.21.
The amplitude distortion due to clipping is described in Fig. B.22.
In CE amplifier during the amplification process of the signal waveform, some
form of amplifier distortion has occurred. CE amplifier’s amplification may not be

Fig. B.21 The amplitude distortion due to incorrect biasing

Fig. B.22 The amplitude distortion due to clipping


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 953

taking place over the whole signal cycle due to incorrect biasing. If CE amplifier’s
input signal is too large, it causes the amplifier to be limited by the supply voltage
(clipping). CE amplifier’s amplification may not be linear over the entire frequency
range of inputs. CE amplifier’s multiplication factor is called the Beta (b) value of
the transistor. Common emitter or even common source type transistor circuits
work fine for small AC input signals. CE amplifiers suffer from one major disad-
vantages: The bias Q-point of a bipolar amplifier depends on the same (b) value
which may vary from transistors of the same type, Q-point for one transistor is not
necessarily the same as the Q-point for another transistor of the same type due to the
inherent manufacturing tolerances. If the CE amplifiers suffer from one major
disadvantage the amplifier may not be linear, amplitude distortion will result, and a
carful choice of the transistor and biasing components can minimize the effect of
amplifier distortion. The CE amplifier’s amplitude distortion is presented in
Fig. B.23.
Phase distortion or delay distortion occurs in a nonlinear transistor amplifier
when there is a time delay between the input signal and its appearance at the output
(Fig. B.24).
The phase change between the input and the output is zero at the fundamental
frequency. The resultant phase angle delay will be the different between the

Fig. B.23 CE amplifier’s amplitude distortion

Fig. B.24 Amplifier’s input signal X(t) and output signal Y(t + Dt)
954 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.25 Amplifier’s phase distortion due to delay

harmonic and fundamental. The time delay (D) will depend on the construction of
the amplifier and will increase progressively with frequency within the bandwidth
of the amplifier. Any practical amplifier will have a combination of both “fre-
quency” and “phase” distortion together with amplitude distortion. Most applica-
tions such as in audio amplifiers or power amplifiers, unless the distortion is
excessive or severe it will not generally affect the operation of the system.
Figure B.25 describes the phase distortion due to delay.
The Intermodulation Distortion (ID), quite similar to the amplitude distortion. ID
is produced when frequencies not harmonically related to the fundamental. Inter
Modulation Distortion (IMD) products can be formed by mixing together of the
carrier with interferers, harmonic, IMD products from other stages, other channels,
or sideband, producing various spurious response. IMD products are in band and
can swamp the desired signal, creating severs interference. When neighbouring
transmitted signal arrives at a PA’s stage, mix together with the transmitter’s carrier,
causing IMDs to be created. ID is produced when two or more frequencies mix in
any nonlinear device. It causes numerous sum and different combinations of the
original fundamental frequencies (second order products: f1 + f2, f1 − f2). It causes
intermodulation products (m  f1 þ n; mf1  f2  n  f2 ), n and m are whole numbers.
Third order ID products, which would be 2  f1 þ f2 , 2  f1  f2 , 2  f2 þ f1 , 2  f2  f1
can be most damaging of the higher or lower IMDs. The second order IMD
products would usually be too far from the receivers or transmitter’s band pass to
create many problems (Fig. B.26).
Third Order Intercept Point (TOIP, IP3): Third order spurious products will be
created within nonlinearity of a device (linear amplifier, active filter, and mixer).
Output IP3 point can never actually reached, since the amplifier will go into sat-
uration before this amplitude is ever truly attained. The value of the IP3 must be
measured only when it is in its linear operating range (DUT is not in compression).
Typically amplifier’s third order intercept point (IP3) is located approximately 10 to
15 dB above its P1 dB compression point. The output IP3 (OIP3) for a BJT
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 955

Fig. B.26 Amplifier’s Inter modulation distortion (IMD)

amplifier approximated by OIP3 ¼ 10  log½VCE  IC  5, VCE is transistor’s col-


lector to emitter voltage [V]. IC is transistor’s collector current [mA]. The higher the
bias level, the higher will be the IP3 of the amplifier. IC is the easiest bias parameter
to increase for high IP3 (Figs. B.27 and B.28).

Fig. B.27 Amplifier’s output versus input and intercept point


956 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.28 Amplifier’s output versus input and intercept point saturation region

Harmonic Distortion (HD): HD occurs when an RF fundamental sine wave (fr) is


distorted due to nonlinearity within a circuit. It is generating harmonically related
frequencies (2  fr ; 3  fr ; . . .; n  fr ). Interference to receivers tuned to megahertz, or
even gigahertz, away from the transmitter’s output frequency (Fig. B.29).
The dominant cause of transmitted harmonics is overdriving a poorly filtered
power amplifier. The cause to an extreme case of distortion resulting in the sine
wave carrier actually is changing into rough square wave. These non- perfect square
waves contain: fundamental frequency, odd harmonics, even harmonics. No active
stage can be completely linear and there are number of harmonics being produced
within all amplifiers.
Amplifier Noise: There are two principal classifications of noise, circuited
generated and externally generated. Both of them limit the possible sensitivity and
gain of the receiver. Amplifier’s noises are unavoidable, but can be minimized.
Circuit noise creates a randomly changing and wide frequency ranging voltage.
Circuit generated noises: White noise created by a component’s electrons randomly
moving around due to thermal energy, and shot noise caused by electrons randomly
moving across a semiconductor junction and into the collector drain of a transistor.
External noise: It is produced by atmospheric upheavals like lighting and space

Fig. B.29 Tx and Rx system


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 957

Fig. B.30 Amplifier’s source


resistance (RS) which gener-
ate noise

noise caused by sunspots and solar flares. Cosmic noise is created by interfering
signals from stars. Noise is generated in all stages in amplifier and radio receivers.
The first stages, operating at the lowest signal levels, which are of main concern,
particularly where low signals from aerials, microphones, etc., are not be amplified.
Figure B.30 describes the source resistance (RS) which generated noise.
Thermal noise is generated because there is no such a device as a perfect
amplifier. Thermal noise is the resistance generates a noise voltage (Et) as follow:
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Et ¼ 2  K  T  B  RS ; K—Boltzmann’s constant, T—Absolute temperature, B—
Bandwidth in hertz. At normal temperature (
17  C), this is simplifies to Et ¼
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1:6  1020  B  RS resistance’s noise is the lowest noise which can be achieved
at the amplifier input. The practical equivalent noise at the input is always higher
than this resistance’s noise. The noise whilst is generated by an amplifier system.
The degree of noise is evaluated by referring it to the amplifier input. It is con-
sidered as equivalent noise at the input as though it were being generated at that
point. The equivalent noise voltage (En) is calculated by dividing the noise mea-
sured at the amplifier output (Eno) by the gain of the amplifier (AV), i.e, En = Eno/
AV. Noise in any system is dependent on bandwidth of the system and this must be
specified when defining noise performance. It is common practice to define noise
for a 1 Hz bandwidth. Noise voltage might be specified in Nano volts per square
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
root of Hertz (nV= Hz). Over a limited bandwidth, noise power can be considered
to be proportional to bandwidth and the noise voltage is proportional to the square
root of bandwidth. If noise voltage is defined for a 1 Hz bandwidth system, noise
can be determined by multiplying by the square root of the system bandwidth. The
level of noise generated by an amplifier system generally varies over a wide
spectrum and for a wide bandwidth. Noise performance must be defined by plotting
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
noise (say in nV= Hz) against frequency. In solid state amplifiers, noise is often
resolved into two components at the amplifier input. An equivalent noise voltage
generator (Vn) and an equivalent noise current generator (In). The first component
(Vn) is independent of the value of source resistance (Rs). The second component
(In) develops a noise voltage across Rs and equal to In  Rs . The noise voltage it
develops is directly proportional to the value of Rs (Fig. B.31).
958 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.31 Equivalent noise voltage and noise current at amplifier input

The Vn can be separated from the voltage developed by In and also the thermal
noise (Et) by short circuiting the input terminals. One method of defining the noise
performance of an amplifier is the noise figure (F). This can be defined as the ratio
of equivalent noise power developed at the input to that generated by thermal noise
in the source resistance (Rs). Noise figure is often expressed in decibel form and a
perfect amplifier would have a Noise Figure (NF) of 0 dB, if such a device were
possible. To establish Noise Figure (NF), the voltage gain (Av) of the amplifier is
measured and the noise voltage output (Eno) is measured at a known bandwidth (B).
For the second measurement, the amplifier input must be terminated in a resistance
(Rs) equal to the normal source resistance. Noise figure is calculated as follows:
( )
Eno
F ¼ 20  log pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi dB:
Av  1:6  1020  B  RS

The noise figure formula assumes a high impedance input to the amplifier. The
effective value of Rs as far as the calculation is concerned, is the parallel result of
the source resistance and input resistance of the amplifier. If the source is a
transmission line and it is terminated in its characteristic impedance (Z0), then Rs
should be substituted by a value Z0 divided by 2 (Fig. B.32).
Small Signal (SS) amplifiers always bias in their linear region. Small Signal
(SS) amplifier needed to increase tiny signal levels to proper levels required for a
transmitter’s final power amplifier (PA). A microwave receivers, first RF amplifier
(class A SS), high gain type. The discreet RF amplifier design topics are choice of
active device, input and output impedance matching network, bias circuit, and

Fig. B.32 Source input, Rs and amplifier


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 959

physical layout. Typical transistor has not a 50 X resistive Zin and Zout and its
reactance will vary over frequency, A þ i  B ! B ¼ gðf Þ then A þ i  gðf Þ.
Matching network must be use to match the device. Using LC components, the
match be perfect for narrow band of frequencies. SS amplifier has also inductive or
capacitive parts when perfect match is 50 þ i  0.
The matching process is as follow: first to match the active device to the sys-
tem’s resistive impedance and second to cancel the innate reactive elements within
the transistor, permit a perfect 50 þ i  0 match with no reactance (capacitive and
inductive). This is calling conjugate matching. RF matching network: Take
S-parameter two port file, which represent transistor and initially ignore any effects
the added DC biasing network which may have on the active device in the final
physical design. This assumption is valid only if small amounts of RF feedback are
produced by the high values of Rf (RB) (feedback resistor) in an amplifier’s bias
network. Low value resistor for Rf (RB) employs heavy RF feedback. When we
choose low value resistor for RF then device’s S-parameter file calculation for the
matching networks may no longer be completely valid for the transistor. It is
accurate only when the bias network employs high resistance values within the bias
network (Fig. B.33).
S-parameter files (*.S2P) contain only RF parameters for few frequencies
(  20). It is possible that interest frequency may falls between two published
values. For accuracy we take mean value between two closest frequencies within

Fig. B.33 Collector feedback bias for BJT transistor circuit


960 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

the file. Example: S-parameters are given in a certain *.S2P file for 3 GHz and
4 GHz. Our design requires a centred frequency at 3.5 GHz. We take the mean
value of each S-parameter at 3 and 4 GHz. To compute S12 at 3.6 GHz we use the
following formula:

S12 MAGð@3 GHzÞ þ S12 MAGð@4 GHzÞ


¼ S12 MAGð@3:5 GHzÞ
2
S12 hð@3 GHzÞ þ S12 hð@4 GHzÞ
¼ S12 hð@3:5 GHzÞ
2

Filename: 21bfg425.001; BFG425WFieldC1; V1 = 7.884E001V, V2 = 2.000E


+000V, I1 = 1.297E−005A, I2 = 1.000E−003A (Table B.2).
When we design a linear amplifier the amplifier need to be stable for our fre-
quency and bias of interest, overall impedance variations, and very wide region of
frequencies both low and high. We use the following K formula (Table B.3):

1 þ ðjDs j2 jS11 j2 jS22 j2 Þ


K¼ ; Ds ¼ S11  S22  S12 S21
2  jS21 j  jS12 j

1 þ ðjDs j2 jS11 j2 jS22 j2 Þ


K¼ ; Ds ¼ S11  S22  S12 S21
2  jS21 j  jS12 j

Example: We need to calculate whether transistor is stable at 1.5 GHz, with


VCE = 10 V and IC = 6 mA. The S-parameters at that frequency and bias point are

Table B.2 S parameters for 3 and 4 GHz (Mag, Ang)


S11 S21 S12 S22
Freq (GHz) Mag Ang Mag Ang Mag Ang Mag Ang
3 0.63 −148 2.19 60.35 0.105 2.75 0.607 −77.07
4 0.591 167.91 1.76 30.28 0.104 −11.14 0.472 −97.41

Table B.3 Amplifier’s K parameter values and outcome


K values Outcome Important!
K>1 Active device stable for all Zins and Zouts Zin and Zout can be not exact
presented its ports match
K<1 Device is potentially unstable Zin and Zout must be very
cautiously selected
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 961

found to be (transistor or S-parameter text file). The following calculation gives


K > 1 @ 1.5 GHz with transistor bias conditions.

S11 ¼ 0:195 \ 167:6 ; S22 ¼ 0:508 \ 32 ; S12 ¼ 0:139 \ 61:2 ; S12 ¼ 2:5 \ 62:4
Ds ¼ S11  S22  S12 S21 ¼ ½0:195 \ 167:6   ½0:508 \  32 
 ½0:139 \ 61:2   ½2:5 \ 62:4  ¼ 0:25 \  61:4
1 þ ðjDs j2 jS11 j2 jS22 j2 Þ 1 þ ðj0:25j2 j0:195j2 j0:508j2 Þ
K¼ ¼ ¼ 1:1
2  jS21 j  jS12 j 2  j2:5j  j0:139j

The maximum available gain (sometimes called MAG and sometimes called
GMAX) of a device is only defined where K is greater than one. Algebraically, this
is because the term under the square root becomes negative for values of K less than
1. If K < 1 then maximum available gain is infinite and infinite gain means
oscillator. GMAX is calculated from stability factor K and the forward and reverse
transmission coefficients (S21, S22).
 
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi S21
GMAX ¼ ðK  K 2  1Þ    for K [ 1:
S12
 
If K = 1 then GMAX ¼ S21 
S12 for K ¼ 1 and available gain is undefined when K
is less than one. That is when the square root of (K2 − 1) becomes imaginary.
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi jS21 j pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ðK þ K 2  1Þ jS21 j
GMAX ¼ ðK  K  1Þ 
2 ¼ ðK  K  1Þ 2 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 
jS12 j ðK þ K 2  1Þ jS12 j
" #
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi jS21 j 1 jS21 j
GMAX ¼ ðK  K  1Þ 
2 ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 
jS12 j ðK þ K  1Þ jS12 j
2
" #
1 jS21 j  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 jS21 j
GMAX ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  K 1) K 2 1K ¼ 2  K  S
ðK þ K 2  1Þ jS12 j j 12 j
h i
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi jS j
ðK þ K 2 1Þ 21
jS21 j pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
jS12 j jS j ðK þ K 2 1Þ
GMAX log ¼ 10  log10 ¼ 10  log10 12 þ 10  log10
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
jS j jS j ðK þ K 1Þ
2
GMAX log ¼ 10  log1021  10  log1012 þ 10  log10
962 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

S11 ¼ 0:195 \ 167:6 ; S22 ¼ 0:508 \  32 ; S12 ¼ 0:139 \ 61:2 ; S12 ¼ 2:5 \ 62:4
Ds ¼ S11  S22  S12 S21 ¼ ½0:195 \ 167:6   ½0:508 \  32 
 ½0:139 \ 61:2   ½2:5 \ 62:4  ¼ 0:25 \  61:4
1 þ ðjDs j2 jS11 j2 jS22 j2 Þ 1 þ ðj0:25j2 j0:195j2 j0:508j2 Þ
K ¼ ¼ ¼ 1:1
2  jS21 j  jS12 j 2  j2:5j  j0:139j

jS j
½ 21  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi j2:5j pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
jS j ðK þ K 2 1Þ ½  ð1:1 1:12 1Þ
GMAX log ¼ 10  log1012 þ 10  log10 ¼ 10  log10
j0:139j
þ 10  log10
¼ 10:63 dB

SS (Small Signal) amplifier stability: A typical amplifier must be unconditionally


stable across all frequencies and input/output impedances. An amplifier may
oscillate at his band when gain is higher than one. Unstable transistor causes to shift
the bias point of the stage and it increases internal device dissipation and possibly
causing its destruction. The display an oscillation is seen in the frequency domain
on a spectrum analyser. It is distinguished by low voltage and low current spurs.
Spurs which begin to shift frequency are viewing instabilities in amplifier.
Instability spurs must be eliminated by stabilizing the circuit. Stability of an
amplifier stage is dependent on transistor’s temperature and bias, signal level, Hfe
spread b(frequency), active device’s positive internal feedback mechanism,
excessively high gain outside of the desired bandwidth, external positive feedback
caused by support components, PCB layout, and RF shield’s box mode (RF
shielding resonances). Additionally the stability of an amplifier stage is dependent
on low frequency gain of a normal amplifier, transistor’s possible instabilities when

Fig. B.34 Amplifier possess a load that no longer appears as 50 X


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 963

presented with anything other than 50 X termination, RF coupling inductor which


at low frequencies presents a true RF choke response over a higher band of limited
frequencies. In low frequency the RF choke will begin to look more like a piece of
straight, low impedance wire (Zchoke ¼ RL þ j  x  L) then amplifier now possess a
load that no longer appears as 50 X. This can cause oscillations in a conditionally
stable amplifier. The solution is to add a high value low frequency choke in series
with low value RF inductor (Fig. B.34).
Frequency decreases cause to lack of 50 X termination because the amplifier’s
matching circuit is good only over specific frequency band. The induction adopted
for decoupling of the low impedance power supply becomes close to short circuit as
frequency decreases (f ðxÞ ! e).
Another way to ensure no amplifier’s low frequency oscillations is to employ a
50 X resistor at the DC end of the bias circuit. The 50 X termination resistance at
low frequencies, the distributed RFC would have little effect. Capacitor CB helps to
shunt low frequency RF to ground, further decreasing the disruptive low frequency
RF gain. Another configuration is maintained strong decoupling from the power
supply at low frequencies. The circuit uses both a low and high frequency choke to
sustain high impedance into the power supply (Figs. B.35 and B.36).

Fig. B.35 Amplifier circuit with termination low frequencies into 50 X to prevent instability
964 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.36 Amplifier circuit with possible location of a shunt or series stabilization resistor

B.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifier Design


& Matching Network

We get the SS amplifier gain and stability by scalar approximation. In the scalar
approximation only the magnitude of the S-parameters are employed and phase
angles are not employed. Gtu is the transducer unilateral gain in dB. It is an
amplifier’s power gain into an unmatched 50 X load, a worse case gain value is
Gtu ¼ 10  log½jS21j2 . Mismatch Loss (ML) is (ML ¼ a  p) at transistor’s input in
decibels: a  pin ¼ 10  logð1  ½S11 2 Þ. Mismatch Loss (ML ¼ a  p) at transis-
tor’s output in decibels: a  pout ¼ 10logð1  ½S22 2 Þ. The Mismatch Loss
(ML) for unmatched transistor is a  Ptotal ¼ apin þ a  pout . The Maximum
Available Gain (MAG) is calculated by MAG ¼ Gtu þ a  Ptotal .

MAG ¼ Gtu þ a  Ptotal ¼ 10  log½jS21j2  10  logð1  ½S11 2 Þ  10  logð1  ½S22 2 Þ:


n o
jS21 j2
ð1S2 Þð1S2 Þ
MAG ¼ 10  log10 11 22
:

The Maximum Stable Gain (MSG) is

jS21 j
MSG ¼ 10  logð Þ:
jS12 j
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 965

If MAG<MSG then the transistor is stable and if MAG>MSG then the transistor
is unstable. Example: we have transistor with the following S-parameters:

S11 ¼ 0:195 \ 167:6 ) S11 ¼ 0:195; S22 ¼ 0:508 \  32 ) S22 ¼ 0:508
S12 ¼ 0:139 \ 61:2 ) S12 ¼ 0:139; S21 ¼ 2:5 \ 62:4 ) S21 ¼ 2:5:

ðj2:5j2 Þ ð10:1952 Þ
Gtu ¼ 10  log10 ¼ 7:96 dB; aPin ¼ 10  log10 ¼ 0:168 dB
ð10:508Þ2
aPout ¼ 10  log10 ¼ 1:29 dB
aPtotal ¼ aPin þ aPout ¼ 0:168 dB þ 1:29 dB ¼ 1:46 dB
MAG ¼ Gtu þ aPtotal ¼ Gtu þ aPin þ aPout ¼ 7:96 dB þ 1:46 dB ¼ 9:42dB
ðj2:5j=j0:139jÞ
MSG ¼ 10  log10 ¼ 12:55 dB; MAG\MSG ) transistor stable

The most amplifiers matching networks are type L (LC), type T, and type PI. We
need to design the amplifier stage’s matching network. Our target is that the
amplifier’s impedance is exactly matching the independences of the circuit. If
ZS ¼ ZL than maximum power is transferred from the source to load (no power
reflections) (Fig. B.37).
The amplifier and load ZS ¼ Rs þ j  Xs ; ZL ¼ RL  j  XL , only if Rs ¼ RL and
Xs ¼ XL then there is a perfect match. There are three popular matching networks L,
PI, T (Fig. B.38).

Fig. B.37 Amplifier and load system

Fig. B.38 Popular matching network (L type, T type, and PI type)


966 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.39 Source load system—matched

We get perfect match when

1 1 1
Xs ¼ XL ) x  L ¼ ; x2 ¼ ) x ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
xC LC LC
1
f ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi :
2p LC

There is only one frequency which will be perfectly matched from source to load
(Fig. B.39).
And unmatched system: (Fig. B.40).
Example A: RS \RL ; f ¼ 1:5 GHz. If Zin ¼ Rs then there is a perfect match
otherwise Zin 6¼ Rs and there is unperfected match (Fig. B.41).

Fig. B.40 Source load system—unmatched


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 967

Fig. B.41 Source load system with L network, unmatched

1 ZC  ZLoad
XL ¼ j  x  L; XC ¼ ; Zin ¼ ZL þ ZC k ZLoad ¼ ZL þ
jxC ZC þ ZLoad
jxC  RL
1
RL
Zin ¼ j  x  L þ 1 ¼ j  x  Lþ
jxC þ RL
1 þ j  x  C  RL
RL ð1  j  x  C  RL Þ
Zin ¼ j  x  L þ  ¼jxL
1 þ j  x  C  RL ð1  j  x  C  RL Þ
RL  ð1  j  x  C  RL Þ
þ
1 þ x2  C2  R2L
j  x  C  R2L RL
Zin ¼ j  x  L  þ
1 þ x2  C2  R2L 1 þ x2  C2  R2L
 
C  R2L RL
¼jx L þ
1 þ x  C  RL
2 2 2 1 þ x  C2  R2L
2

RL C  R2L
ð1Þ ) ¼ RS ; ð2Þ ) L  ¼ 0;
1 þ x2  C  RL
2 2 1 þ x2  C 2  R2L
RL
ð1Þ ) ¼ 1 þ x2  C 2  R2L
RS
ð1Þ ) x2  C 2  R2L
 
RL 1 1 1 RL
¼ 1)C ¼ 2
 ¼  1
RS RL  RS  x2 x2  R2L x2  R2L RS
s
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RL 1
ð1Þ ) C ¼  1 ¼
x  RL RS 2  p  1:5 GHz  58
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
58
  1 ¼ 3:56  1012 ¼ 3:56 pF:
12
968 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

C  R2L C  R2L
ð2Þ ) L  ¼ 0 ) L ¼
1 þ x2  C2  R2L 1 þ x2  C2  R2L
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
h iffi
xRL  RS  1  RL
1 RL 2

¼ h i
1 þ x2  xR
1
L
 RRLS  1  R2L
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
h iffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
h iffi
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
 ffi
RL
x
RL
RS  1 RL
x
RL
RS  1
RS RL
ð2Þ ) L ¼ h i ¼ RL ¼  1
1 þ RRLS  1 RS
x RS
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
12 58
¼   1 ¼ 2:48  109 ¼ 2:48 nH
2  p  1:5 GHz 12

Example B: RS [ RL ; f ¼ 1:5 GHz and for match Zin ¼ Rs (Fig. B.42).


 
 1 
1
 ðj  x  L þ RL Þ
Zin ¼ ZC 
ðZL þ RL Þ ¼
ðj  x  L þ RL Þ ¼ jxC
j  x  C 1
jxC þ ðj  x  L þ RL Þ
j  x  L þ RL
¼
j  x  C þ RL  x 2  C  L þ 1
RL þ j  x  L RL þ j  x  L
Zin ¼ ¼
½1  x2  C  L þ j  x  C  RL ½1  x2  C  L þ j  x  C  RL
½1  x2  C  L  j  x  C  RL

½1  x2  C  L  j  x  C  RL
ðRL þ j  x  LÞ  f½1  x2  C  L  j  x  C  RL g
Zin ¼
½1  x2  C  L2 þ x2  C 2  R2L
RL  ½1  x2  C  L
¼
½1  x2  C  L  x2  C 2  R2L
x  C  R2L x  L  ½1  x2  C  L
j þj
½1  x  C  L  x  C  RL
2 2 2 2 ½1  x2  C  L þ x2  C 2  R2L
x 2  L  C  RL
þ
½1  x  C  L2 þ x2  C 2  R2L
2

RL fx  L  x3  C  L2  x  C  R2L g
Zin ¼ 2
þj 
½1  x2  C  L  x2  C2  R2L ½1  x2  C  L2  x2  C2  R2L
RL x  fL  x2  C  L2  C  R2L g
Zin ¼ þj
½1  x2  C  L2 þ x2  C2  R2L ½1  x2  C  L2 þ x2  C 2  R2L
RL
Zin ¼ RS ) ð1Þ ¼ RS ; ð2ÞL  x2  C  L2  C  R2L ¼ 0
½1  x2  C  L2 þ x2  C2  R2L
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 969

Fig. B.42 Source load system with L network unmatched

L
ð2ÞL  x2  C  L2  C  R2L ¼ 0 ) C ¼ ; ð2Þ ) ð1Þ )
x2  L2  R2L
RL
ð1Þ h i h i2 ¼ RS
1  x2  x2 LL2 R2  L2 þ x2  x2 LL2 R2 RS
L L

 2
RL x2  L2 x 2  L 2  R2
ð2Þ ¼ 1 2 2 þ )
RS x L R 2
½x2  L2  R2 2
" #2
12 ð2  p  1:5  109 Þ2  L2 ð2  p  1:5  109 Þ2  L2  122
ð2Þ 0:2 ¼ ¼ 1 2
þh i2
58 ð2  p  1:5  109 Þ  L2  122 ð2  p  1:5  109 Þ2  L2  122

NSolve½fð1  ((2 3:14Þ^ 2


ð1:5 1;000;000;000Þ^ 2 x xÞ=ðð2 3:14Þ^ 2 ð1:5 10;000;000;000Þ^ 2 x x þ 144ÞÞ
^
2 þ ðð2 3:14Þ^ 2 ð1:5 1;000;000;000Þ^ 2 x x 144Þ=ðð2 3:14Þ^ 2
ð1:5 10;000;000;000Þ^ 2 x x þ 144Þ^ 2gh12=58; fxg
ffx ! 2.49413  109 g; fx ! 2.49413  1019 gg

Two solutions: L1 ¼ 2:49  109 ; L2 ¼ 2:49  109 ) L ¼ 2:49 nH


L 2:49 nH
ð2Þ C ¼ 2 2 )C¼
x  L  RL 2
ð2  p  1:5  109 Þ2  ½2:49 nH2  122
¼ 3:587  1012 ¼ 3:587 pF
970 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

EDU (2.49  0:000000001)/((2 3.14 1.5 2.49).^ 2 þ 144Þ


ans ¼
3:5870e012

When two different, but pure resistances must be matched the L-technique is
applied to perform the task. If reactance XL or XC must be cancelled, we use two
methods: first the absorption uses to reactance of the impedance matching network
itself to be absorb the undesired load and/or source reactance. Second the reso-
nance, which is utilized to resonant out the stray reactance of the device or circuit to
be matched at our desired frequency.
First absorption method: this is accomplished by positioning the matching
inductor in series with any load or source inductive reactance. In this way, the load
or source’s XL becomes a part of the matching inductor. The same outcome can be
attained by positioning a matching capacitor in parallel with any load or source XC.
Thus we are combining the two values into one larger value. This allows the
internal stray reactance of both devices to contribute the matching network. This
internal reactance is being subtracted from the calculated values of the LC matching
components. The transistors own stray reactance is now becoming an additive part
of the matching network. This absorption method is only useful if the stray internal
reactance of the device is less than the calculated reactance required for a proper
match. Figure B.43 describes the circuit that requires the addition of components to
absorb reactance.
LS þ L1 ! L01 is a new inductance value for matching L network. CS þ C1 ! C10
is a new capacitor value for matching L network. The absorption methods are by
using Z match network. The below figure describes the absorption methods by
using Z matching network (Figs. B.44, B.45 and B.46).
Second absorption (resonance) method: Resonance technique is utilized to res-
onate out the stray reactance of the device or circuit to be matched at our desired
frequency (f). It is done with a reactance that is equal in value, but opposite sign and
then continuing on as if the matching problem were a completely resistive one
(R þ j  0). This will make the internal stray reactance of the two devices or circuits

Fig. B.43 Amplifier (source) and load, absorb reactance methods


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 971

Fig. B.44 Amplifier (source) and load Z match network

Fig. B.45 Amplifier (source) and load L – network

Fig. B.46 Amplifier (source) and load matching flow chart


972 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.47 Amplifier (source) and load resonance impedance matching

Fig. B.48 Amplifier (source) and load canceling the load’s stray reactance

disappear and allowing only the pure resistances to be easily dealt with. We need to
design a matching network which employing the second method. Figure B.47
describes the resonance impedance matching.
We need to resonate out 1.5 pF (Cstray) of stray capacitance within the load. It is
done by employing a shunt inductor with value of L ¼ j2pf j12 C (Fig. B.48).
stray

1
Cstray kL ) ZT ¼ j  x  Lk
j  x  Cstray
j  x  L  jxC1 stray jxL
) ZT ¼ ¼
j x Lþ 1
jxCstray
1  x2  L  Cstray
xL
ZT ¼ j  ; Resonate ) ZT ! 1ðdisconnected  element)
1  x2  L  Cstray
1e
) ZT ! 1 ) 1 - x2  L  Cstray ! e ) L ! 2 ;e¼0
x  Cstray
1 1
)L¼ 2 ¼
x  Cstray j2  p  f j2 Cstray
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 973

Fig. B.49 Combine shunt inductor with L1 (L—network inductor)

Since ZT ! ∞, the internal stray capacitance can be considered as no longer


existing within the load. Since the source is purely resistive (Zs ¼ Rs þ j  0) and the
load is also pure resistive (ZL ¼ RL þ j  0) then we utilize the basic resistive lumped
matching techniques. We need to design an L-network to match source to load. The
Z match network is L-network, we can combining both of the inductors (L1 & L),
with a single inductor (Fig. B.49).
Three elements impedance matching (PI or T) networks are used in many narrow
band applications. The narrow band is due to the higher loaded Q over what the
L-network possesses. PI and T networks also permit any Q to be selected. We
always consider that PI & T Q’s L-network Q’s. The Q desired for a particular
application is calculated with the following formula,

Fig. B.50 PI matching network between source and load


974 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

fc
When utilizing high Q inductor Q = f2 f 1
. Q is the loaded quality factor of the
circuit. fc is the center frequency of the circuit. f2 is the upper frequency, need to
pass with little loss. f1 is the lower frequency, need to pass with little loss, we use PI
network to match two different pure resistances (Fig. B.50).
We consider PI network as two L networks attached back to back. There is a
virtual resistor “R” in the center, which is used only as an aid in designing these
networks. The virtual “R” will not be in the final design. We choose (Fig. B.51)

XP1 ¼ 2:68 X; XS1 ¼ 2:55 X; XS2 ¼ 5:7 X; XP2 ¼ 5:8 X; Q ¼ 10

RL is pure resistance of the load. RS is pure resistance of the source (amplifier).


Rh = max (RS, RL).
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
00 00
R 1 RH RH RH
¼ 2 ) 00 00 ¼ Q þ 1 ) Q ¼ 00 00  1 ) Q ¼ 00 00  1
2 2
RH Q þ1 R R R
R 58
RH ¼ maxðRs ; Rl Þ; 00 R00 ¼ 2
H
¼ Q¼10 ¼ 0:57 X
Q þ 1 RH¼58 102 þ 1
RL RL 58
RL kXP2 ) Q ¼ ) XP2 ¼ ¼ ¼ 5:8 X
XP2 Q 10
XS2
Q ¼ 00 00 ) XS2 ¼ Q  00 R00 ¼ 10  0:57 ¼ 5:7 X
R
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
RS RS RS RS
XP1 ¼ ; Q1 ¼ 00 00  1; XP1 ¼ ¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 2:68 X
Q1 R Q1 RS
100 R00
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
RS 12 XS1
Q1 ¼ 00 00  1 ¼  1 ¼ 4:48; Q1 ¼ 00 00 ) XS1
R 5:7 R
¼ Q1  00 R00 ¼ 4:48  0:57 ¼ 2:55

We need to convert the reactance calculated to L and C values.

Fig. B.51 Virtual resistor and two L networks to design a PI network


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 975

X
2
XS
XS1 þ XS2 ¼ XSi ; XS ¼ x  L ¼ 2  p  f  L )
i¼1
2 p f
1 1 1
XP ¼ ¼ )C¼
x C 2 p f  C 2  p  f  XP

To match two stages with a PI network, while canceling reactance and matching
resistances, first we convert the load/source to/from parallel or series equivalences
and second we make it easier to absorb any reactance. Any PI network can be
transformed to an equivalent T network. This is also known as the Wye-Delta
transformation, which is the terminology used in power distribution and electrical
engineering. The PI is equivalent to the Delta and the T is equivalent to the Wye (or
star) form. The PI network and T network topologies are described in Fig. B.52.
The impedances of the PI network (Za, Zb, Zc) can be found from the impe-
dances of the T-network with the following equations:

Za ¼ ½ðZ1  Z2 Þ þ ðZ1  Z3 Þ þ ðZ2  Z3 Þ=Z2 ; Zb ¼ ½ðZ1  Z2 Þ þ ðZ1  Z3 Þ þ ðZ2  Z3 Þ=Z1


Zc ¼ ½ðZ1  Z2 Þ þ ðZ1  Z3 Þ þ ðZ2  Z3 Þ=Z3 :

The common numerator in all these expressions can prove useful in reducing the
amount of computation necessary. The impedances of the T-network (Z1, Z2, Z3)
can be found from the impedances of the equivalent PI-network with the following
equations. The next expression describes the PI network to T network transfor-
mation. There is a common denominator in these expressions.

Z1 ¼ ðZa  Zc Þ=ðZa þ Zb þ Zc Þ; Z2 ¼ ðZb  Zc Þ=ðZa þ Zb þ Zc Þ;


Z3 ¼ ðZa  Zb Þ=ðZa þ Zb þ Zc Þ
There is a case where all the impedances are creative (i.e. they are all in the form
j  X). In that case, the (−1) factors from squaring j  j on the top cancel the (−1)

Fig. B.52 PI network and T network


976 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

from bringing the j in the denominator up top. In that case also all T-network
impedances are reactive. The below equations describe the situation when all PI
network impedances are reactive.

Za  Zc Zb  Zc Za  Zb
Z1 ¼ ; Z2 ¼ ; Z3 ¼
Za  Zb  Zc Za  Zb  Zc Za  Zb  Zc
Za ¼ j  a; Zb ¼ j  b; Zc ¼ j  c
Za  Zc j a j c j2  a  c a c
Z1 ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼j
Za þ Zb þ Zc j  a þ j  b þ j  c j  ða þ b þ cÞ ða þ b þ cÞ
Zb  Zc j a j c j2  b  c b c
Z2 ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼j
Za þ Zb þ Zc j  a þ j  b þ j  c j  ða þ b þ cÞ ða þ b þ cÞ
Za  Zc j a j b j2  a  b a b
Z1 ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼j
Za þ Zb þ Zc j  a þ j  b þ j  c j  ða þ b þ cÞ ða þ b þ cÞ

SS (Small Signal) amplifier synthesis of PI and T networks to transform resis-


tances and create phase shifts. We assume that the desired port impedances are
purely resistive (i.e. real). The design of T or PI network with purely reactive
components is both to produce a desired phase shift (beta) and transform the
impedances with the following equations. T and PI networks design (R1, R2, b).
 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
j  R1  cos b  R1  R2 j  R2  cos b  R1  R2
Z1 ¼ ; Z2 ¼
sin b sin b
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
j  R1  R2 j  R1  R2  sin b
Z3 ¼ ; Za ¼  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
sin b R2  cos b  R1  R2
j  R1  R2  sin b pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Zb ¼  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ; Zc ¼ j  R1  R2  sin b
R1  cos b  R1  R2

The beta (b) is the phase lag passing through the network from either port 1 to
port 2 or vice versa. If beta (b) is 0 or p, these expressions break down, except if
R1 = R2. To transform resistive impedances without any phase shift, we have to use

Fig. B.53 Source amplifier and load, T-network


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 977

a transformer. In many practical applications, the load or generator impedances may


be reactive (i.e. Z (port 1) and Z (port 2) are some general R + j  X). This can be
accommodated by absorbing the external reactive impedance into the network,
reducing or increasing the series or shunt impedance as required. If T-network is
required to connect between two impedances: 50 + j  0 and 100 – j  20 with 45
degrees of phase shift (b) (Fig. B.53).

Zs ¼ 50 þ j  0; Zl ¼ 100  j  20; R1 ¼ 50; R2 ¼ 100; b ¼ 45


 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
j  50  0:707  50  100
Cos b ¼ sin b ¼ 0:707; Z1 ¼ ¼ j  50
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 0:707
 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
j  100  0:707  50  100 j  50  100
Z2 ¼ ¼ 0; Z3 ¼ ¼ j  100
0:707 0:707

What happened if R1 = R2? (Two equal resistive impedances), T-network.


 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
j  R1  cos b  R1  R2 j  R  ½cos b  1
Z1 ¼ jR1 ¼R2 ¼R ¼
sin b sin b
 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
j  R2  cos b  R1  R2 j  R  ½cos b  1
Z2 ¼ jR1 ¼R2 ¼R ¼
sin b sin b
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
j  R1  R2 j  R
Z3 ¼ ¼
sin b sin b

What happened if R1 = R2? (Two equal resistive impedances), PI-network.

j  R1  R2  sin b R sin b
Za ¼  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi jR1 ¼R2 ¼R ¼ j 
R2  cos b  R1  R2 ½cos b  1
j  R1  R2  sin b R sin b
Zb ¼  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi j ¼j
R1  cos b  R1  R2 R1 ¼R2 ¼R ½cos b  1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Zc ¼ j  R1  R2  sin b

The certain high frequency microwave applications, we use distributed matching


elements. It may be a lower cost and higher performance alternative to using
lumped parts. The method limitation: inability to easily create series capacitors. We
should employ a shunt distributed capacitors when matching impedances in our
microwave designs. What happened when the series input impedance of the device
is inductive? And we would like to tune it out. We use conjugate series capacitance
to cancel the transistor’s series input inductance (Fig. B.54).
978 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.54 Conjugate series capacitance to cancel transistor’s series input impedance

Hint: We would like to get away from using a lump series capacitor.
Solution: We convert the series input impedance of the device into equivalent
parallel input impedance. The equivalent parallel input impedance circuit permits us
to exploit a shunt distributed element. The shunt distributed element resonates out
the input impedance of the device. Series input impedance: Xs series reactance (X)
and Rs series resistance (X). Parallel input inductance: Xp equivalent parallel
reactance (X) and Xp equivalent parallel resistance (X). We interest in amplifier’s
series input impedance circuit to parallel input impedance circuit conversion. We
need to get the expressions for Xp and Rp as functions of Xs, Rs and developing the
mathematical connections between those circuit’s parameters (Fig. B.55).

Fig. B.55 Series input impedance and parallel input impedance


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 979

j  XP  RP j  XP  RP j  XP þ RP
j  XS þ RS ¼ ) j  XS þ RS ¼ 
j  XP þ RP j  XP þ RP j  XP þ RP
X  RP þ j  XP  RP
2 2
) j  XS þ RS ¼ P ) j  XS þ RS
XP2 þ R2P
X 2  RP XP  R2P
¼ 2P þ j 
XP þ R2P XP2 þ R2P
XP  R2P XP  R2P
ð1Þ XS ¼ 2 ) XP2 þ R2P ¼ ;
XP þ RP 2 XS
XP2  RP X 2  RP
ð2Þ RS ¼ ) XP2 þ R2P ¼ P
XP þ RP
2 2 RS
XP  RP XP  RP
2 2
ð1Þ & ð2Þ ) ¼
XS RS
RP XP RP  RS 2 X 2  RP
) ¼ ) XP ¼ ; XP þ R2P ¼ P
XS RS XS RS

h i2
  RP R R  R 2
RP RS
 RP
XP2 RP  RS XS P P S
XP2 þ R2P
¼ ) þ RP ¼
2
¼ 
RS XS RS RS XS
   
RP  RS 2 RP RP  RS 2
þ R2P ¼ 
XS RS XS
2

R RP R2 R2 RP R2S
) R2P þ R2P  S2 ¼  R2P  S2 ) R2P  1 þ S2 ¼ R2P  
XS RS XS XS RS XS2

R2 RP R2S R2 RP R2S R2 RS
R2P  1 þ S2 ¼ RP   2 ) 1 þ S2 ¼  2 ) 1 þ S2 ¼ RP  2
XS RS XS XS RS XS XS XS
R2S RS X2
1þ 2
¼ RP  2 ) RP  RS ¼ XS2 þ R2S ) RP ¼ S þ RS
XS XS RS

Conclusion: We could design the distributed matching circuit as we would the


lumped type. We simply substitute the equivalent distributed components
(microwave as equivalent components).

RP  RS XS2
ðAÞXP ¼ ; ðBÞRP ¼ þ RS
XS RS

We substitute the equivalent distributed components by micro strip as equivalent


components. For small (and large) signal devices, we implement quarter wave line
transformer. We use a distributed transformer to match a 50 X resistive source to an
980 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.56 Distributed transformer to match a 50 X resistive source

unequal resistive load. The distributed transformer to match a 50 X resistive source


to an unequal resistive load is as follow (Fig. B.56):
The matching can be accomplished as follow: calculate the input/output impe-
dances of the device to be matched, it is series impedance, or R þ j  XðR  j  XÞ.
Otherwise we obtain these values from the data sheet. We convert series R þ j 
XðR  j  XÞ to parallel as required. Whether we elect to utilize parallel or series will
depend on the following. It would be easier, with micro strip, to resonate out the
reactance in series or to resonate out the parallel circuit equivalent. If a distributed
part must be used for this purpose, a shunt capacitor is always desire. We calculate
the required micro strip width and length, at the frequency of interest. Simulate a
lumped value that will cancel out the reactive component of the device being
matched. We make the input or output R + j  0. Lumped microwave capacitors
and inductors can also be utilized if the micro strip part is unrealizable. We match
the real (resistive) part of the transistor’s input or output by employing the mi-
crostrip transformer. The microstrip transformer section is placed between the two
mismatched impedances.
Example: 50 X for the system’s transmission line impedance, and 20 X for the
transistor’s input resistance. The transformer segment will be long ¼ k4  Vp
Vp is the propagation velocity. As wide as a microstrip transmission line would
be with an impedance of
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Z ¼ R1  R2 ; R1 ¼ 20X; R2 ¼ 50 X ) Z ¼ 20  50 ¼ 31:6 X:

For other requirements we need to use equation to plug in different microstrip


widths to obtain the desired impedance. The characteristic impedance of the
microstrip is (X) and Z0 is the microstrip’s characteristic impedance. W is the width
of the microstrip conductor. h is the thickness of the substrate between the ground
plane and the microstrip conductor.
377
Z0 ¼   pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
W
h þ 1  Er þ Er

W and h use the same units and Er is the dielectric constant of the board material.
The dielectric constant of the medium does not have a unit because it is a ratio.
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 981

377
Z0 ¼   pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
W
h þ 1  Er þ Er

A 50 X microstrip is utilized in microwave circuits to prevent reflections and


mismatch losses between physically separated components. A calculated nominal
width will prevent the line from being either inductive or capacitive at any point
along its length.
Our target: Source’s output impedance matched to the microstrip. Microstrip
matched to the input impedance of the load.
Results: No standing or reflected waves and no power dissipated at heat, except
in the actual resistance of the copper and dielectric as I2  R loss. In microstrip, the
dielectric constant (Er) of the PCB’s substrate material will not be the sole Er. There
is a flux leakage into the air above the PCB, combined with the flux penetrating into
the dielectric. Actual effective dielectric constant Eff, is true dielectric constant that
the microstrip see. There is some value between the surrounding air and the true
dielectric constant of the PCB. To avoid RF field leakage from microstrips,
transmission lines should be isolated by at least two or more line widths and create
spaces between traces and circuits for decreasing any mutual coupling effects.
We decrease any impedance bumps at high microwave frequencies by keeping
microstrip always be run as short and as straight as possible. Microstrip’s angle
(turn) should using a mitered or slow turn bend (Fig. B.57).
We need to find the actual wavelength of the signal which it is being slowed
down by the PCB’s substrate material. We calculate the microstrip’s velocity of
propagation (Vp): First find the effective dielectric constant Eff of the
microstrip. The signal will be partly in the dielectric and partly in the air above the
microstrip. This affects the propagation velocity through this combination of the
two dielectric mediums. We need to find the actual wavelength of the signal in
microstrip line. Eff is the effective dielectric constant that the microstrip sees. Er is
the actual dielectric constant of the PCB’s substrate material. h is the thickness of
the substrate material between the top conductor and the bottom ground plane of the
microstrip. W is the width of the top conductor of the microstrip (same units as h).

Fig. B.57 Miter bend and


curve bend in microstrip line
982 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Vp is the fraction of the speed of light as compared to light in a vacuum. kvac is the
wavelength of the signal of interest in a perfect vacuum. f is the frequency of the
signal of interest, GHz. The actual wavelength of the signal in microstrip line is as
follows:
8 9
>
< >
=
Er þ 1 ðEr  1Þ 1 1
Eeff ¼ þ  qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi &VP ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 >
: 2 1 þ ð12h >
; Eeff
W Þ

1
) VP ¼ sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi

; kvac ¼ 11;800=f
Er þ 1 ðEr 1Þ
2 þ 2  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ffi
1þð 12h
W Þ

kvac 11;800
k ¼ VP  kvac ¼ sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi

¼ sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi

Er þ 1 ðEr 1Þ Er þ 1 ðEr 1Þ


2 þ 2  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ffi f 2 þ 2  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ffi
1þð
12h
W Þ 1þð 12h
W Þ

The functional connection between microstrip characteristics impedance and


PCB's parameters (k,f,h,W) is Z0 ¼ nðW; h; k; f Þ.
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
uE þ 1 (Er  1)
11;800 u r 1
k ¼ rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ) t þf  qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffig
2 2
f  Er 2þ 1 þ f(Er21)  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 1 ffig 1 þ ð12h W Þ
1þð
12h
W Þ

11;800 Er þ 1 (Er  1) 1 11;8002


¼ þf  qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffig ¼ 2
kf 2 2 1 þ ð12hÞ k  f2
W

Er 1 Er 1 1 1 11;8002
) þ þ  qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi   qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 2
2 2 2 1 þ ð12hÞ 2 1 þ ð12hÞ k  f2
W W

1 1 1 1 11;8002
Er   ½1 þ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi þ ½1  qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 2
2 1 þ ð12h 2 k  f2
W Þ 1 þ ð12h W Þ

1 1 11;8002 1 1
) Er   ½1 þ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 2   ½1  qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 1þð W Þ k  f 2 2 1 þ ð12h W Þ
12h

1 1 11;8002 1 1
Er   ½1 þ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 2   ½1  qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 1þð W Þ k  f 2 2 1 þ ð12h W Þ
12h

2118002
k2 f 2
 ½1  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ffi
1þð
12h
Þ
) Er ¼ W

½1 þ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ffi
1 þ ð12h
W Þ
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 983

377
Z0 ¼   pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
W
h þ 1  Er þ Er
377
¼ vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u   v u
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
 
u u211;8002
u211;8002  1pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi u  p ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
 u
1 1
W 1
W þ u
k2 f 2 k2 f 2
u  1 þ ð12hÞ
u 
1 þ ð12hÞ
W
h þ1  u t
t 1 þ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1
1 þ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1
12h1þð Þ 12h
1þð Þ
W W

Question: We have a system of amplifier and load. The source resistance


(Rs) value is lower than load resistance (Rl) value. Rs = 15 X and our load
resistance can’t be lower than Г0 [X] value and maximum load resistance variation
can be D [X]. We use L—matching network which have fix inductor L1 and fix
capacitor C1. We have trim capacitor in series to L—Network’s C1 capacitor, sign it
as Cx. What is the variation gap of Cx trim capacitor, if we want to match our
amplifier to load over all possible load values? Find Cx = n(Rs, Г0, D) and possible
maximum and minimum Cx values. f = 2 GHz (Fig. B.58).
Answer: First we need to get Zin expression. Capacitors C1 and Cx are in series
and the total Capacitance is C1−x. C1−x = C1Cx/(C1 + Cx); Zc1−x = 1/(j  xC1−x).
C1  CX 1 1
C1X ¼ ; ZC1X ¼ ¼ n o
C1 þ CX j  x  C1X j  x  C1 CX
C1 þ CX
C1 þ CX C1 þ CX
¼ ¼ j 
j  x  C1  CX x  C1  CX
ZC1X  RL
ZC1X k Zload ¼ ZC1X k RL ; Zload ¼ RL ; ZC1X k RL ¼
ZC1X þ RL
C1 þ CX
j  xC 1 CX
 RL
¼ C1 þ CX
j  xC 1 CX
þ RL
j  ðC1 þ CX Þ  RL
ZC1X k RL ¼
j  ðC1 þ CX Þ þ RL  x  C1  CX
j  ðC1 þ CX Þ  RL
¼
RL  x  C1  CX  j  ðC1 þ CX Þ
984 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Fig. B.58 Unmatched system Rs < Rl

j  ðC1 þ CX Þ  RL RL  x  C1  CX þ j  ðC1 þ CX Þ
ZC1X k RL ¼ 
RL  x  C1  CX  j  ðC1 þ CX Þ RL  x  C1  CX þ j  ðC1 þ CX Þ
ðC1 þ CX Þ2  RL  j  ðC1 þ CX Þ  R2L  x  C1  CX
ZC1X k RL ¼
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ2  RL
ZC1X k Zload ¼ ZC1X k RL ¼
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ  R2L  x  C1  CX
j
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2

RS ½perfect match ¼ Zin ¼ RS ; Zin ¼ ZL þ ZC1X k Zload ; ZL ¼ j  x  L


ðC1 þ CX Þ2  RL
Zin ¼ ZL þ ZC1X k Zload ¼ j  x  L þ
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ  R2L  x  C1  CX
j
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ2  RL
Zin ¼ ZL þ ZC1X k Zload ¼
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ  R2L  C1  CX
þ j  x  fL  g
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2

For perfect match we need: RS = Zin; Zin = RS.


Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 985

ðC1 þ CX Þ2  RL
ð1Þ ¼ RS
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ  R2L  C1  CX
ð2ÞL  ¼0
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2

We know that

RL C0 & RL  C0 þ D

RL C0 & RL  C0 þ D ) C0  RL  C0 þ D; RL 2 ½C0 ; C0 þ D
ðC1 þ CX Þ2  RL
ð1Þ RS ¼ ) R2L  x2  C12  CX2  RS
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2  RS ¼ ðC1 þ CX Þ2  RL
R2L  x2  C12  CX2  RS ¼ ðC1 þ CX Þ2  ðRL  RS Þ ) ðC1 þ CX Þ2
R2L  x2  C12  CX2  RS
¼
RL  RS

ðC1 þ CX Þ  R2L  C1  CX
ð1Þ ) ð2Þ ) L  ¼0
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ  R2L  C1  CX
) L ¼0
R2L x2 C12 CX2 RS
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ RL RS
ðC1 þ CX Þ  R2L  C1  CX

R2L x2 C12 CX2 RS
R2L  x2  C12  CX2 þ RL RS
ðC1 þ CX Þ  R2L  C1  CX  ðRL  RS Þ
)L¼ 2
RL  x  C12  CX2  ðRL  RS Þ þ R2L  x2  C12  CX2  RS
2

R2L  x2  C12  CX2  ðRL  RS Þ  L þ R2L  x2  C12  CX2  RS  L


¼ ðC1 þ CX Þ  R2L  C1  CX  ðRL  RS Þ

R2L  x2  C12  CX2  ðRL  RS Þ  L þ R2L  x2  C12  CX2  RS  L


¼ C1  R2L  C1  CX  ðRL  RS Þ þ CX  R2L  C1  CX  ðRL  RS Þ
R2L  x2  C12  CX2  ðRL  RS Þ  L þ R2L  x2  C12  CX2  RS  L
¼ C12  R2L  CX  ðRL  RS Þ þ CX2  R2L  C1  ðRL  RS Þ
CX2  R2L  C1  ðRL  RS Þ  R2L  x2  C12  CX2  ðRL  RS Þ  L
 R2L  x2  C12  CX2  RS  L þ C12  R2L  CX  ðRL  RS Þ ¼ 0
CX2  fR2L  C1  ðRL  RS Þ  R2L  x2  C12  ðRL  RS Þ  L
 R2L  x2  C12  RS  Lg þ C12  R2L  CX  ðRL  RS Þ ¼ 0
986 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

CX2  fR2L  C1  RL  R2L  C1  RS  R2L  x2  C12  RL  L þ R2L  x2  C12  RS  L


 R2L  x2  C12  RS  Lg þ C12  R2L  CX  ðRL  RS Þ ¼ 0
CX2  fR2L  C1  RL  R2L  C1  RS  R2L  x2  C12  RL  Lg þ C12  R2L  CX  ðRL  RS Þ ¼ 0
CX2  R2L  C1  fRL  RS  x2  C1  RL  Lg þ C12  R2L  CX  ðRL  RS Þ ¼ 0
CX  ½CX  R2L  C1  fRL  RS  x2  C1  RL  Lg þ C12  R2L  ðRL  RS Þ ¼ 0
ð1Þ CX ¼ 0; ð2ÞCX  R2L  C1  fRL  RS  x2  C1  RL  Lg þ C12  R2L  ðRL  RS Þ ¼ 0
ð2ÞCX  R2L  C1  fRL  RS  x2  C1  RL  Lg þ C12  R2L  ðRL  RS Þ ¼ 0 )
C12  R2L  ðRS  RL Þ C1  ðRS  RL Þ
CX ¼ ) CX ¼
R2L  C1  fRL  RS  x2  C1  RL  Lg RL  RS  x2  C1  RL  L

We need to get RL as a function of Cx and additional components.

C1  ðRS  RL Þ
CX ¼ ) C X  R L  C X  R S  C X  x2  C 1  R L  L
R L  R S  x2  C 1  R L  L
¼ C1  RS  C1  RL
CX  RL  CX  x2  C1  RL  L þ C1  RL ¼ C1  RS þ CX  RS
RL  fCX  CX  x2  C1  L þ C1 g ¼ RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ
RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ
)RL ¼
CX  CX  x2  C1  L þ C1
RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ
RL C0 ) RL ¼ C0 ) C0
CX  CX  x2  C1  L þ C1 CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1
RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ
C0 )  C0 0
CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1 CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1

In case (=) exist we get

RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ
 C0 ¼ 0
CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1

RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ
 C0 ¼ 0 ) ¼ C0
CX  f1  x  C1  Lg þ C1
2 CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1
RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ ¼ CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0 þ C1  C0
RS  C1 þ RS  CX ¼ CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0 þ C1  C0
RS  C1  C1  C0 ¼ CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0  RS  CX
ð1Þ
CX  fC0  x2  C1  L  C0  RS g ¼ RS  C1  C1  C0 ) CX
C1  ðRS  C0 Þ
¼
C0  ½1  x2  C1  L  RS
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 987

The other option for case (=) is when upper limit is Г0 + D, Г0 ! Г0 + D then

ð1Þ C1  ðRS  C0 Þ C1  ðRS  C0  DÞ


CX ¼ j !
C0  ½1  x2  C1  L  RS C0 !C0 þ D ðC0 þ DÞ  ½1  x2  C1  L  RS
ð2Þ C1  ðRS  C0  DÞ
CX ¼
ðC0 þ DÞ  ½1  x2  C1  L  RS
ð2Þ ð1Þ
Since Г0 > 0 & D > 0 ! CX \CX
ð2Þ ð1Þ
Additionally there is no way that CX ! 1 or CX ! 1

ð1Þ C1  ðRS  C0 Þ
CX ¼ ) C0  ½1  x2  C1  L  RS 6¼ 0
C0  ½1  x2  C1  L  RS
RS
) 1  x2  C1  L 6¼
C0
RS
x  C1  L 6¼ 1 
2
C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
) x 6¼
2
 ð1  Þ ) x 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þ
C1  L C0 C1  L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
) 2  p  f 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þ ) f 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þ;
C1  L C0 2  p  C1  L C0
RS RS
1  [0 ) 1[ ) C0 [ RS
C0 C0

ð2Þ C1  ðRS  C0  DÞ
CX ¼ ) ðC0 þ DÞ  ½1  x2  C1  L  RS 6¼ 0
ðC0 þ DÞ  ½1  x2  C1  L  RS
RS
1  x2  C1  L 6¼
C0 þ D
RS 1 RS
) x2  C1  L 6¼ 1  ) x2 6¼  ð1  Þ
C0 þ D C1  L C0 þ D
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
x 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  1  ) 2  p  f 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  1 
C1  L C0 þ D C1  L C0 þ D
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS RS
f 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  1  )1 [0
2  p  C1  L C0 þ D C0 þ D
RS
) 1[ ) C0 þ D [ RS
C0 þ D
988 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

Discussion No.1: check the values interval for lower limit Г0.

RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ
 C0 0 )  C0 [ 0
CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1 CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1
RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ  CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0  C1  C0
[0
CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1

Case No.1.A:

RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ  CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0  C1  C0 [ 0
& CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1 [ 0
RS  C1 þ RS  CX  CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0  C1  C0 [ 0
& C1 [ CX  fx2  C1  L  1g
CX  ½RS  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0  [ C1  C0  RS  C1
& C1 [ CX  fx2  C1  L  1g
CX  ½RS  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0  [ C1  ½C0  RS 
& C1 [ CX  fx2  C1  L  1g

We consider RS  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0 [ 0 and x2  C1  L  1 [ 0
Then

C1  ½C0  RS  C1
CX [ & CX \ 2
RS  f1  x  C1  Lg  C0
2 x  C1  L  1

C1 C1  ½C0  RS 
[ CX [
x2  C1  L  1 RS  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0
C1 C1  ½1  CRS0 
) 2 [ CX [ RS
x  C1  L  1 C  f1  x  C1  Lg
2
0

We already know that Г0 > RS then Cx always has positive value.

RS RS C1 C1  ½1  CRS0 
\1 ) 1 [ ½1   [ 0; 2 [ 0 & RS [0
C0 C0 x  C1  L  1 C0  f1  x  C1  Lg
2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
x2  C1  L  1 [ 0 ) ðx  C1  L  1Þ  ðx  C1  L þ 1Þ [ 0
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
) x  C1  L  1 [ 0
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
x  C1  L  1 [ 0 ) x  C1  L [ 1
1 1 1
) x [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ) 2  p  f [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ) f [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
C1  L C1  L 2  p  C1  L
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 989

RS
 f1  x2  C1  Lg [ 0
C0
RS 1 RS
) ð  1Þ þ x2  C1  L [ 0 )  ð  1Þ þ x2 [ 0
C0 C1  L C0
1 RS 1 RS
 ð  1Þ þ x [ 0 ) x 
2 2
 ð1  Þ [ 0
C1  L C0 C1  L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
x2   ð1  Þ [ 0 ) ½x  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þ
C1  L C0 C1  L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS
 ½x þ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þ [ 0
C1  L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
x  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þ [ 0 ) x [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þ
C1  L C0 C1  L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS
) 2  p  f [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þ
C1  L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
2  p  f [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þ ) f [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þ
C1  L C0 2  p  C1  L C0

We have two conditions:


rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 RS
ff [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffig [ ff [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi  ð1  Þgjqffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2  p  C1  L 2  p  C1  L C0 R
ð1CS Þ\0
0

1
¼ ff [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffig
2  p  C1  L

Case No.1.B:

RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ
 C0 0 )  C0 [ 0
CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1 CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1
RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ  CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0  C1  C0
[0
CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1

RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ  CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0  C1  C0 \0 &
CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1 \0
RS  C1 þ RS  CX  CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0  C1  C0 \0 &
C1 \CX  fx2  C1  L  1g
CX  ½RS  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0 \C1  C0  RS  C1 & C1 \CX  fx2  C1  L  1g
CX  ½RS  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0 \C1  ½C0  RS  & C1 \CX  fx2  C1  L  1g
990 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods

We consider RS  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0 [ 0 and x2  C1  L  1 [ 0
Then

C1  ½C0  RS  C1
CX \ & CX [ 2
RS  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C0 x  C1  L  1

Then

C1  ½1  CRS0  C1
CX \ RS & CX [
C0  f1  x2  C1  Lg x2  C1  L  1

C1 C1  ½1  CRS0 
\CX \
x2  C1  L  1 C0  f1  x  C1  Lg
RS 2

Finally for Case No.1 we have possible two options:

C1 C1  ½1  CRS0 
ð1Þ [ CX [
x2  C1  L  1 RS
C0  f1  x2  C1  Lg

C1 C1  ½1  CRS0 
ð2Þ 2 \CX \ RS
x  C1  L  1 C  f1  x  C1  Lg
2
0

We need to decide which option is feasible for us. We define X as the difference
between out limits bands (UL/LL).

C1 C1  ½1  CRS0 
X¼ 
x2  C1  L  1 CRS  f1  x2  C1  Lg
0

and need to find if X > 0 or X < 0 or X = 0.

C1 C1  ½1  CRS0 
X¼ 
x2  C1  L  1 CRS  f1  x2  C1  Lg
h 0
i
C1  CRS0  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C1  ½1  CRS0   ½x2  C1  L  1
¼ h i
½x2  C1  L  1  CRS0  f1  x2  C1  Lg
C1  CRS0  C1  f1  x2  C1  Lg  ½C1  C1  CRS0   ½x2  C1  L  1
X¼ h i
½x2  C1  L  1  CRS0  f1  x2  C1  Lg
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 991

C1  CRS0  C1  f1  x2  C1  Lg  fC1  ½x2  C1  L  1  C1  CRS0  ½x2  C1  L  1g


X¼ h i
½x2  C1  L  1  CRS0  f1  x2  C1  Lg
C1  CRS0  C1  f1  x2  C1  Lg  C1  ½x2  C1  L  1 þ C1  CRS0  ½x2  C1  L  1
X¼ h i
½x2  C1  L  1  CRS0  f1  x2  C1  Lg
C1  CRS0  C1  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1  ½1  x2  C1  L þ C1  CRS0  x2  C1  L  C1  CRS0
X¼ h i
½x2  C1  L  1  CRS0  f1  x2  C1  Lg
C1  CRS0  x2  C1  L R
X¼ h i ;C1  S  x2  C1  L [ 0
½x  C1  L  1  C0  f1  x  C1  Lg
2 RS 2 C 0

h i
If ½x2  C1  L  1  RS
C0  f1  x2  C1  Lg [ 0 then X [ 0
h i
If ½x2  C1  L  1  CRS0  f1  x2  C1  Lg \0 then X\0
If X [ 0 then

C1 C1  ½1  CRS0 
[ CX [
x2  C1  L  1 RS
C0  f1  x2  C1  Lg

If X\0 then

C1 C1  ½1  CRS0 
\CX \
x2  C1  L  1 C0  f1  x  C1  Lg
RS 2

Discussion No.2: check the values interval for upper limit Г0 + D.

RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ
 C0 þ D;  C0  D  0
CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1 CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1
RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ
)  ðC0 þ DÞ  0
CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1
RS  ðC1 þ CX Þ  CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg  ðC0 þ DÞ  C1  ðC0 þ DÞ
0
CX  f1  x2  C1  Lg þ C1
Appendix C
BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model
and MOSFET Model

A bipolar junction transistor (BJT or bipolar transistor) is a type of transistor that


relies on the contact of two types of semiconductor for its operation. BJTs can be
used as amplifiers, optoisolation circuits, switches, or in oscillators in many
industrial and commercial applications. BJTs can be found either as individual
discrete components, or in large numbers as parts of integrated circuits. The
operation of bipolar transistor involves both electron and holes. There are two kinds
of charge carriers which characteristic of the two kinds of doped semiconductor
material. Electrons are majority charge carriers in n-type semiconductors, whereas
holes are majority charge carriers in p-type semiconductors. Unipolar transistors
such as the field-effect transistors have only one kind of charge carrier. Charge flow
in a BJT is due to diffusion of charge carriers across a junction between two regions
of different charge concentrations. The regions of a BJT are called emitter, col-
lector, and base. A discrete transistor has three leads for connection to these regions.
Typically, the emitter region is heavily doped compared to the other two layers,
whereas the majority charge carrier concentrations in base and collector layers are
about the same. By design, most of the BJT collector current is due to the flow of
charges injected from a high-concentration emitter into the base where there are
minority carriers that diffuse toward the collector, and so BJTs are classified as
minority-carrier devices. There are two types of BJT transistors, PNP and NPN
based on the doping types of the three main terminal regions. An NPN transistor
comprises two semiconductor junctions that share a thin p-doped anode region, and
a PNP transistor comprises two semiconductor junctions that share a thin n-doped
cathode region. In an NPN transistor, when positive bias is applied to the base–
emitter junction, the equilibrium is disturbed between the thermally generated
carriers and the repelling electric field of the n-doped emitter depletion region. This
allows thermally excited electrons to inject from the emitter into the base region.
These electrons diffuse through the base from the region of high concentration near
the emitter towards the region of low concentration near the collector. The electrons
in the base are called minority carriers because the base is doped p-type, which
makes holes the majority carrier in the base.

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 993


O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6
994 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

The collector–emitter current can be viewed as being controlled by the base–


emitter current (current control), or by the base–emitter voltage (voltage control).
These views are related by the current–voltage relation of the base–emitter junction,
which is just the usual exponential current–voltage curve of a p-n junction (diode).
The Bipolar transistor exhibits a few delay characteristics when turning on and off.
Most transistors and especially power transistors, exhibit long base-storage times
that limit maximum frequency of operation in switching applications. One method
for reducing this storage time is by using a Baker clamp. The proportion of elec-
trons able to cross the base and reach the collector is a measure of the BJT effi-
ciency. The heavy doping of the emitter region and light doping of the base region
causes many more electrons to be injected from the emitter into the base than holes
to be injected from the base into the emitter. The common-emitter current gain is
represented by bF ðbf Þ or the h-parameter hFE. It is approximately the ratio of the
DC collector current to the DC base current in forward-active region. It is typically
greater than 50 for small-signal transistors but can be smaller in transistors designed
for high-power applications. Another important parameter is the common-base
current gain aF ðaf Þ. The common-base current gain is approximately the gain of
current from emitter to collector in the forward-active region. This ratio usually has
a value close to unity; between 0.98 and 0.998. It is less than unity due to re-
combination of charge carriers as they cross the base region.

IC IC IC IC =IE aF bF
aF ¼ ;b ¼ ;b ¼ ¼ ¼ ; aF ¼ :
IE F IB F IE  IC 1  IC =IE 1  aF bF þ 1

Transistors can be thought of as two diodes (P–N junctions) sharing a common


region that minority carriers can move through. A PNP BJT will function like two
diodes that share an N-type cathode region, and the NPN like two diodes sharing a
P-type anode region. Connecting two diodes with wires will not make a transistor,
since minority carriers will not be able to get from one P–N junction to the other
through the wire. Both types of BJT function by letting a small current input to the
base control an amplified output from the collector. The result is that the transistor
makes a good switch that is controlled by its base input. The BJT also makes a good
amplifier, since it can multiply a weak input signal to about 100 times its original
strength. Networks of transistors are used to make powerful amplifiers with many
different applications. In the discussion below, focus is on the NPN bipolar tran-
sistor. In the NPN transistor in what is called active mode, the base–emitter voltage
VBE and collector–base voltage VCB are positive, forward biasing the emitter–base
junction and reverse-biasing the collector–base junction. In the active mode of
operation, electrons are injected from the forward biased n-type emitter region into
the p-type base where they diffuse as minority carriers to the reverse-biased n-type
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 995

Fig. C.1 Bipolar transistor shown as two back to back p-n junction

collector and are swept away by the electric field in the reverse-biased collector–
base junction. For a figure describing forward and reverse bias, see semiconductor
diodes. The bipolar junction transistor can be considered essentially as two p-n
junctions placed back to back, with the base p-type region being common to both
diodes. This can be viewed as two diodes having a common third terminal as shown
in the below figure. The two diodes are not in isolation, but are interdependent. This
means that the total current flowing in each diode is influenced by the conditions
prevailing in the other. In isolation, the two junctions would be characterized by the
normal diode equation with a suitable notation used to differentiate between the two
junctions as can be seen. When the two junctions are combined, to form a transistor,
the base region is shared internally by both diodes even though there is an external
connection to it (Fig. C.1).
In the forward active mode, aF of the emitter current reaches the collector. This
means that aF of the diode current passing through the base-emitter junction con-
tributes to the current flowing through the base-collector junction. Typically, aF has
a value of between 0.98 and 0.99. This is shown as the forward component of
current as it applies to the normal forward active mode of operation of the device.
This current is shown as a conventional current. It is equally possible to reverse the
biases on the junctions to operate the transistor in the “reverse active mode”. In this
case, aR ðar Þ times the collector current will contribute to the emitter current. For the
doping ratios normally used the transistor will be much less efficient in the reverse
mode and aR would typically be in the range 0.1–0.5. The Ebers-Moll transistor
model is an attempt to create an electrical model of the device as two diodes whose
currents are determined by the normal diode law but with additional transfer ratios
to quantify the interdependency of the junctions. Two dependent current sources are
used to indicate the interaction of the junctions. Figure C.2 describes NPN Bipolar
transistor Ebers Moll model.
996 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

Fig. C.2 NPN bipolar transistor Ebers moll model

Applying Kirchoff’s laws to the model gives the terminal current as:

IDE ¼ IE þ ar  IDC ; IC þ IDC ¼ af  IDE ; af  Ise ¼ ar  Isc ¼ Is ; IE ¼ IC þ IB

af ¼ 0:98  0:99 typically. ar ¼ 0:1  0:5 typically. Ise : reverse saturation


current of the base emitter diode. Isc : reverse saturation current of the base collector
VBC VBE
diode. IDC ¼ Isc  ðe VT  1Þ; IDE ¼ Ise  ðe VT  1Þ. VT – the thermal voltage VT ’
kT
q (approximately 26 mV at 300 K (*room temperature). IE is the transistor’s
emitter current. IC is the transistor’s collector current. IB is the transistor’s base
current. The base internal current is mainly by diffusion (see Fick’s law) and
VBE
JnðbaseÞ ¼ qDWn nbo  e VT . W is the base width. Dn is the diffusion constant for electron
in the p type base.
VBE VBC
IDE ¼ IE þ ar  IDC ) Ise  ðe VT  1Þ ¼ IE þ ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
VBE VBC
) IE ¼ Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
VBC VBE
IC þ IDC ¼ af  IDE ) IC þ Isc  ðe VT  1Þ ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ
VBE VBC
) IC ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
VBE VBC
IB ¼ IE  IC ¼ ð1  af Þ  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ þ ð1  ar Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ:
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 997

If we use the notation af  Ise ¼ ar  Isc ¼ Is ; Isc ¼ aIsr ; Ise ¼ aIsf the following Ebers
Moll equations:

Is VBE Is VBC Is VBE VBC


IE ¼  ðe VT  1Þ  ar   ðe VT  1Þ ) IE ¼  ðe VT  1Þ  Is  ðe VT  1Þ
af ar af
Is VBE I s
VBC VBE Is VBC
IC ¼ af   ðe VT  1Þ   ðe VT  1Þ ) IC ¼ Is  ðe VT  1Þ   ðe VT  1Þ
af ar ar
Is VBE I s
VBC 1 1  af 1 1  ar
IB ¼ ð1  af Þ   ðe VT  1Þ þ ð1  ar Þ   ðe VT  1Þ; ¼ ; ¼
af ar bf af br ar
Is VBE I s
VBC
IB ¼ ð1  af Þ   ðe VT  1Þ þ ð1  ar Þ   ðe VT  1Þ
af ar
Is VBE Is VBC
) IB ¼  ðe VT  1Þ þ  ðe VT  1Þ
bf br

The expressions for VBE, VBC, and VCE are as follow:


VBC
VBE VBC VBE IE þ ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
IE ¼ Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  ar  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ ) ðe VT
 1Þ ¼
Ise
VBC
IE þ ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ VBC
IC ¼ af  Ise  ð Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ ) IC
Ise
VBC VBC
¼ af  IE þ af  ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
VBC VBC I C  af  I E
IC ¼ af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ ) e VT ¼ þ1
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
 
VBC I C  af  I E I C  af  I E
e VT ¼ þ 1 ) VBC ¼ VT  ln þ1
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
VBE
VBE VBC VBC af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  IC
IC ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ ) ðe VT
 1Þ ¼
Isc
VBE
VBE af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  IC
IE ¼ Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  ar  Isc  ð Þ ) IE
Isc
VBE VBE
¼ Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  ar  af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ þ ar  IC
VBE VBE I E  ar  I C
IE ¼ ð1  ar  af Þ  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ þ ar  IC ) e VT ¼ þ1
ð1  ar  af Þ  Ise
 
VBE I E  ar  I C I E  ar  I C
e VT ¼ þ 1 ) VBE ¼ VT  ln þ1 ;
ð1  ar  af Þ  Ise ð1  ar  af Þ  Ise
 
ar  I C  I E
VBE ¼ VT  ln þ1
ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
998 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

We can summery our intermediate results:


   
IC  af  IE ar  I C  I E
VBC ¼ VT  ln ð Þ þ 1 ; VBE ¼ VT  ln ð Þþ1
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc ðar  af  1Þ  Ise

VCE = VCB + VBE, but VCB = −VBC. Then VCE = VBE − VBC.
Remark: there is a use with capital and small letters in the Appendix compares to
book chapter 1, consider the terminology is the same.

Ie ¼ IE ; Ic ¼ IC ; Ib ¼ IB ; Vt ¼ VT ; Vbe ¼ VBE ; Vcb ¼ VCB ; Vce ¼ VCE


 
I C  af  I E
VCB ¼ VBC ¼ VT  ln ð Þ þ 1 ; VCE ¼ VBE  VBC
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
 
ar  I C  I E
VCE ¼ VBE  VBC ¼ VT  ln ð Þþ1
ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
 
I C  af  I E
 VT  ln ð Þþ1
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
 
ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
VCE ¼ VT  ln
ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
 
IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
 VT  ln
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc

½ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc


VCE ¼ VT  ln 
ðar  af  1Þ  Ise ½IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 

½ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise  Isc


VCE ¼ VT  ln 
½IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc  Ise

½ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


VCE ¼ VT  ln
½IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 
Isc Isc Isc
þ VT  lnð Þ;  1 ) lnð Þ ! e
Ise Ise Ise

½ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


VCE  VT  ln
½IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc 

Figure C.3 describes PNP Bipolar transistor Ebers Moll model.


VEB VCB
IDE ¼ IE þ ar  IDC ) Ise  ðe VT  1Þ ¼ IE þ ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
VEB VCB
) IE ¼ Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 999

Fig. C.3 PNP Bipolar transistor Ebers Moll model

VCB VEB
IC þ IDC ¼ af  IDE ) IC þ Isc  ðe VT  1Þ ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ
VEB VCB
) IC ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
VEB VCB
IB ¼ IE  IC ¼ ð1  af Þ  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ þ ð1  ar Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ:

If we use the notation af  Ise ¼ ar  Isc ¼ Is ; Isc ¼ aIsr ; Ise ¼ aIsf the following Ebers
Moll equations:

Is VEB Is VCB Is VEB VCB


IE ¼  ðe VT  1Þ  ar   ðe VT  1Þ ) IE ¼  ðe VT  1Þ  Is  ðe VT  1Þ
af ar af
Is VEB I s
VCB VEB Is VCB
IC ¼ af   ðe VT  1Þ   ðe VT  1Þ ) IC ¼ Is  ðe VT  1Þ   ðe VT  1Þ
af ar ar
Is VEB I s
VCB 1 1  af 1 1  ar
IB ¼ ð1  af Þ   ðe VT  1Þ þ ð1  ar Þ   ðe VT  1Þ; ¼ ; ¼
af ar bf af br ar
Is VEB I s
VCB
IB ¼ ð1  af Þ   ðe VT  1Þ þ ð1  ar Þ   ðe VT  1Þ
af ar
Is VEB Is VCB
) IB ¼  ðe VT  1Þ þ  ðe VT  1Þ
bf br
1000 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

The expressions for VEB, VCB, and VEC are as follow:


VCB
VEB VCB VEB IE þ ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
IE ¼ Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  ar  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ ) ðe VT
 1Þ ¼
Ise
VCB
IE þ ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ VCB
IC ¼ af  Ise  ð Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ ) IC
Ise
VCB VCB
¼ af  IE þ af  ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
VCB VCB I C  af  I E
IC ¼ af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ ) e VT ¼ þ1
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
VCB I C  af  I E IC  af  IE
e VT ¼ þ 1 ) VCB ¼ VT  ln½ þ 1
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
VEB
VEB VCB VCB af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  IC
IC ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ ) ðe VT
 1Þ ¼
Isc
VEB
VEB af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  IC
IE ¼ Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  ar  Isc  ð Þ ) IE
Isc
VEB VEB
¼ Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  ar  af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ þ ar  IC
VEB VEB IE  ar  IC
IE ¼ ð1  ar  af Þ  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ þ ar  IC ) e VT ¼ þ1
ð1  ar  af Þ  Ise
VEB IE  ar  IC I E  ar  I C
e VT ¼ þ 1 ) VEB ¼ VT  ln½ þ 1;
ð1  ar  af Þ  Ise ð1  ar  af Þ  Ise
ar  I C  I E
VEB ¼ VT  ln½ þ 1
ðar  af  1Þ  Ise

We can summery our result regarding IC and IE:


VEB VCB VEB VCB
IC ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ; IE ¼ Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
VEB VCB
IB ¼ IE  IC ¼ Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
VEB VCB
 ½af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
VEB VCB
IB ¼ IE  IC ¼ ð1  af ÞIse  ðe VT  1Þ þ ð1  ar Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ;
VBE ¼ VEB ; VBC ¼  VCB
VBE VBC
IC ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ;
VBE VBC
IE ¼ Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  ar  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ
VBE VBC
IB ¼ IE  IC ¼ ð1  af ÞIse  ðe VT
 1Þ þ ð1  ar Þ  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1001

VCE = VCB + VBE, but VCB = −VBC. Then VCE = VBE – VBC.
   
I C  af  I E ar  IC  IE
VCB ¼ VT  ln þ 1 ; VEB ¼ VT  ln þ1
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
   
I C  af  I E ar  I C  I E
VBC ¼ VT  ln þ 1 ; VBE ¼ VT  ln þ1
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
   
I C  af  I E ar  I C  I E
VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE ¼ VT  ln þ 1  VT  ln þ1
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
 
IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE ¼ VT  ln
ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
 
ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise
 VT  ln
ðar  af  1Þ  Ise



IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc Ise
VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE ¼ VT  ln 
ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise Isc

IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE ¼ VT  ln
ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise

Ise Ise
þ VT  ln ; Ise  Isc ; ln !e
Isc Isc

IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE  VT  ln
ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise

½ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise 


VCENPN  VT  ln ; VCEPNP
½IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc

IC  af  IE þ ðaf  ar  1Þ  Isc
 VT  ln
ar  IC  IE þ ðar  af  1Þ  Ise

Summary of our BJT NPN and PNP transistors Ebers-Moll equations


(Table C.1):
There are three basic circuit configurations to connect bipolar junction transistor.
First: Common Base (CB), both the input and output share the base “in common”.
Second: Common Emitter (CE), both the input and output share the emitter “in
common”. Third: Common Collector (CC), both the input and output share the
collector “in common”. There are four bipolar junction transistor biasing modes.
Active biasing is useful for amplifiers (most common mode). Saturation biasing
mode is equivalent to an on state when transistor is used as a switch. Cutoff biasing
mode is equivalent to an off state when transistor is used as a switch. Inverted
biasing mode is rarely if ever used (Table C.2a, b ).
1002 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

Table C.1 Summary of our BJT NPN and PNP transistors Ebers-Moll equations
BJT NPN transistor BJT PNP transistor
VBE VBC VBE VBC
IC IC ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ IC ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ
VBE VBC VBE VBC
IE IE ¼ Ise  ðe  1Þ  ar  Isc  ðe  1Þ
VT VT
IE ¼ Ise  ðe VT
 1Þ  ar  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ
VBE
IB Is VBE
IB ¼ ð1  af Þ   ðe VT  1Þ IB ¼ ð1  af ÞIse  ðe VT
 1Þ
af VBC

Is VBC þ ð1  ar Þ  Isc  ðe VT
 1Þ
þ ð1  ar Þ   ðe VT  1Þ
ar
n o n o
VCE ½a I I þ ða a 1ÞI  I af IE þ ðaf ar 1ÞIsc
VCE  VT  ln ½ICr aC f IEE þ ðarf afr 1ÞIsesc  VCE  VT  ln aCr IC I E þ ðar af 1ÞIse

Table C.2a Summary of NPN BJT transistor biasing mode


Biasing mode E-B junction bias C-B junction bias Applied voltages
(NPN) (NPN) (NPN) (NPN)
Saturation Forward Forward VE < VB > VC
Active (forward Forward Reverse VE < VB < VC
active)
Inverted (reverse Reverse Forward VE > VB > VC
active)
Cutoff Reverse Reverse VE > VB < VC

Table C.2b Summary of PNP BJT transistor biasing mode


Biasing mode (PNP) E-B junction bias C-B junction bias Applied voltages
(PNP) (PNP) (PNP)
Saturation Forward Forward VE > VB < VC
Active (forward Forward Reverse VE > VB > VC
active)
Inverted (reverse Reverse Forward VE < VB < VC
active)
Cutoff Reverse Reverse VE < VB > VC

The BJT transistor base current is much smaller that the emitter and collector
currents in forward active mode. If the collector of an NPN transistor was open
circuit, it would look like a diode. When forward biased, the circuit in the
base-emitter junction would consist of holes injected into the emitter from the base
and electrons injected into the base from the emitter. But since there are many more
electrons in the emitter than holes in the base, the vast majority of the current will be
due to electrons. When the reverse biased collector is added, It “sucks” the electrons
out of the base. Thus, the base-emitter current is due predominantly to hole current
(the smaller current component) while the collector-emitter current is due to elec-
trons (larger current component due to more electrons from the n+ emitter doping).
We define two BJT transistor performance parameters: emitter efficiency (c) and
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1003

base transport factor (aT). Emitter efficiency parameter characterizes how effective
the large hole current is controlled by the small electron current. Unity is best, zero is
worst. Base transport factor characterizes how much of the injected hole current is
lost to recombination in the base. Unity is best, zero is worst.

IEp IEp
c¼ ¼
IE IEp þ IEn
ICp
aT ¼ :
IEp

We define some equations in active mode, common base characteristics. ICBo is


defined as the collector current when the emitter is open circuit. It is the collector
base junction saturation current. IC is the fraction of emitter current making it across
the base + leakage current.

IC ¼ adc  IE þ ICBo ;

where adc is the common base DC current gain.

ICp ¼ aT  IEp ¼ c  aT  IE ; IC ¼ ICp þ ICn ¼ aT  IEp þ ICn ¼ c  aT  IE þ ICn ; adc


¼ c  aT

and ICBo ¼ ICn . We define some equations in active mode, common emitter
characteristics. ICEo is defined as the collector current when the base is open circuit.
IC is multiple of the base current making it across the base + leakage current.
IC ¼ bdc  IB þ ICEo ; Where bdc is the common emitter DC current gain. ICEo is
defines as the collector current when the base is open circuit.
aF ¼ adc is common base current gain. IE ¼ aR  IC ; aR 6¼ aDC . In inverse mode,
the emitter current is the fraction of the collector current “collected”.

adc ICBo
IE ¼ IC þ IB ; IC ¼ adc  ðIC þ IB Þ þ ICBo ; IC ¼  IB þ
1  adc 1  adc
adc ICBo IC
bdc ¼ ; ICEo ¼ ;b ¼
1  adc 1  adc dc IB

We can break the BJT transistor up into a large signal analysis and a small signal
analysis and “linearize” the non-linear behavior of the Ebers-Moll model. Small
signal models are only useful for forward active mode and thus, are derived under
this condition. Saturation and cutoff are used for switches which involve very large
voltage/current swings from on to off states.
Small signal models are used to determine amplifier characteristics
(“Gain” = increase in the magnitude of a signal at the output of a circuit relative to
its magnitude at the input of the circuit). Just like when a diode voltage exceeds a
certain value, the non-linear behavior of the diode leads to distortion of the
current/voltage curves, if the inputs/outputs exceed certain limits, the full Ebers-Moll
1004 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

model must be used. There are physical meanings of bf (bF) and br (bR). bF is the
current gain (IC/IB) of the device when it is operating with the emitter as the emitter
and the collector as the collector in the active mode. bR is the current gain of the
device when it is operating with the emitter as a collector and the collector as an
emitter in the reverse mode. The BJT device is made to have higher forward current
gain than reverse current gain. The terminals for emitter and collector are not
completely interchangeable due to different doping of the collector and emitter.
BJTtransistor modes of operation:
The Ebers-Moll BJT model is a good large signal, steady-state model of the
transistor and allows the state of conduction of the device to be easily determined
for different modes of operation of the device. The different modes of operation are
determined by the manner in which the junctions are biased. BJT NPN transistor
Ebers-Moll BJT model:
VBE VBC VBE
IC ¼ af  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ; IE ¼ Ise  ðe VT  1Þ
VBC
 ar  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ
Is VBE Is VBC
IB ¼ ð1  af Þ   ðe VT  1Þ þ ð1  ar Þ   ðe VT  1Þ;
af ar
Is Is
af  Ise ¼ ar  Isc ¼ Is ; Isc ¼ ; Ise ¼
ar af
VBE VBC
IB ¼ ð1  af Þ  Ise  ðe VT  1Þ þ ð1  ar Þ  Isc  ðe VT  1Þ

(A) Forward Active mode:


VBE VBE VBE
B-E forward biased, VBE positive e VT 1; ðe VT  1Þ  e VT . B-C reverse
VBC VBC
biased, VBC negative e VT 1; ðe VT  1Þ  1. Then from the Ebers-Moll model
equations we get the following results:
VBE VBE VBE
IE ’ Ise  e VT þ ar  Isc  Ise  e VT ; Ise  e VT ar  Isc ;

Relatively large.
VBE VBE VBE
IC ’ af  Ise  e VT þ Isc  af  Ise  e VT ¼ af  IE ; af  Ise  e VT Isc ;

Relatively large.
VBE VBE
IB ’ ð1  af Þ  Ise  e VT  ð1  ar Þ  Isc  ð1  af Þ  Ise  e VT
VBE
¼ ð1  af Þ  IE ; ð1  af Þ  Ise  e VT ð1  ar Þ  Isc
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1005

(B) Reverse active mode: VBE VBE


B-E reverse biased, VBE negative e VT 1; ðe VT  1Þ  1. B-C forward biased,
VBC VBC VBC
VBC positive e VT 1; ðe VT  1Þ  e VT . The transistor conducts in the opposite
direction. Then from the Ebers-Moll model equations we get the following results:
VBC VBC VBC
IE ’ Ise  ar  Isc  e VT  ar  Isc  e VT ; ar  Isc  e VT Ise ;

Moderately high.
VBC VBC VBC
IC ’ af  Ise  Isc  e VT  Isc  e VT ; Isc  e VT af  Ise ; Moderate:
VBC VBC VBC
IB ’ ð1  af Þ  Ise þ ð1  ar Þ  Isc  e VT  ð1  ar Þ  Isc  e VT ; ð1  ar Þ  Isc  e VT
ð1  af Þ  Ise

It is as high as 0.5  |IC|. This mode does not provide useful amplification but is
used, mainly, for current steering in switching circuits, e.g. TTL.
(C) Cut-off mode:
B-E is unbiased, VBE = 0 v. B-C is reverse biased, VBC negative.
VBE VBE VBC VBC
e VT ¼ 1; ðe VT  1Þ ! e ¼ 0; e VT 1; ðe VT  1Þ  1

IE ’ ar  Isc ; Leakage current nA. IC ’ Isc ; Leakage current nA.


IB ’ ð1  ar Þ  Isc .
This is equivalent to a very low conductance between collector and emitter, i.e.
open switch (Fig. C.4).
(D) Saturation mode: VBE VBE VBE
B-E is forward biased, VBE is positive e VT 1; ðe VT  1Þ  e VT and both junc-
VBC VBC VBC
tions are forward biased. B-C is forward biased, VBCe VT 1; ðe VT  1Þ  e VT .
We get the following currents expressions:
VBE VBC VBE VBC
IC  af  Ise  e VT  Isc  e VT ; IE  Ise  e VT  ar  Isc  e VT
VBE VBC
IB  ð1  af Þ  Ise  e VT þ ð1  ar Þ  Isc  e VT
1006 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

Fig. C.4 The cutoff mode of operation as equivalent to a leaky switch

In this case, with both junctions forward biased.

VBE  0:8 V; VBC  0:7 V; VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE ; VCB ¼ VBC ; VCE ¼ VBE  VBC
¼ 0:1 V

There is a 0.1 V drop across the transistor from collector to emitter which is
quite low while a substantial current flows through the device. In this mode it can be
considered as having a very high conductivity and acts as a closed switch with a
finite resistance and conductivity (Fig. C.5).
BJT transistor avalanche breakdown region of operation:
An avalanche transistor is a bipolar junction transistor designed for operation in
the region of its collector-current/collector-to-emitter voltage characteristics beyond
the collector-to-emitter breakdown voltage, called avalanche breakdown region.
This region characterized by avalanche breakdown, a phenomenon similar to
Negative Differential Resistance (NDR). Operation in the avalanche breakdown
region is called avalanche-mode operation. It gives avalanche transistors the ability

Fig. C.5 Saturation mode of operation equivalent to a closed switch


Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1007

to switch very high currents with less than nanosecond rise and fall times (transition
times). Transistors not specifically designed for the purpose can have reasonably
consistent avalanche properties.
Static avalanche regioncharacteristics: The static characteristic of an avalanche
transistor is IC-VCE. The static characteristic of an avalanche NPN transistor is the
same as PNP devices only changing sign to voltages and currents accordingly. The
avalanche breakdown multiplication is present only across the collector-base
junction. The first step of the calculation is to determine collector current as a sum
of various component currents through the collector since only those fluxes of
charge are subject to this phenomenon. Applying Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL) to
a bipolar junction transistor, implies the following relation which satisfied by the
collector current IC (IC = IE − IB) while for the same device working in the active
region. a ¼ af ; b ¼ bf ; IC ¼ b  IB þ ðb þ 1Þ  ICBo , IB is the base current. ICBo is the
collector-base reverse leakage current. IE is the emitter current. B is the common
emitter current gain of the transistor. Equating the two formulas for IC gives the
following result
IE ¼ ðb þ 1Þ  IB þ ðb þ 1Þ  ICBo and since a ¼ b þb 1; a is the common base
current gain of the transistor, then

a  IE ¼ b  IB þ b  ICBo ¼ IC  ICBo ) IC ¼ a  IE þ ICBo :

When the avalanche effects in a transistor collector are considered, the collector
current IC is given by IC ¼ M  ða  IE þ ICBo Þ. M is miller’s avalanche multipli-
cation coefficient. It is the most important parameter in avalanche mode operation
M¼ 1
VCB n . BVCBo is the collector-base breakdown voltage. n is a constant
1ðBV Þ
CBo
depending on the semiconductor used for the construction of the transistor and
doping profile of the collector-base junction. VCB is the collector-base voltage.
Using Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL) for the bipolar junction transistor and the
expression for M, the resulting expression for IC is the following:

M a  IB þ ICBo
IC ¼  ða  IB þ ICBo Þ ) IC ¼
ð1  a  MÞ 1  a  ðBV VCB n
Þ
CBo

VCB ¼ VCE  VBE ; VBE ¼ VBE ðIB Þ

where VBE is the base-emitter voltage.

a  IB þ ICBo a  IB þ ICBo
IC ¼ VBE ðIB Þ n
’ VCE n
1a ðVCEBV Þ 1  a  ðBV CBo
Þ
CBo
1008 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

Since VCE VBE . This is the expression of the parametric family of the col-
lector characteristics IC–VCE with parameter IB (IC) increases without limit if

VCE n pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi BVCBo


ð1  aÞ ¼ ð Þ ) VCE ¼ BVCEo ¼ BVCBo  n ð1  aÞ ¼ p ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ;
BVCBo n
bþ1
b 1
1a¼1ð Þ¼
bþ1 bþ1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi BVCBo
b 1 ) VCE ¼ BVCEo ¼ BVCBo  n ð1  aÞjb 1 ¼ p n
ffiffiffi :
b

where BVCEo is the collector-emitter breakdown voltage.


Avalanche Multiplication: The maximum reverse biasing voltage which may be
applied before breakdown between the collector and base terminals of the transistor,
under the condition that the emitter lead be open circuited, is represented by the
symbol BVCBo. This breakdown voltage is a characteristic of the transistor alone.
The breakdown may occur because of avalanche multiplication of the current ICO
that crosses the collector junction. As a result of this multiplication, the current
becomes M  ICO , in which M is the factor by which the original ICO is multiplies by
the avalanche effect. It is possible to neglect leakage current, which does not flow
through the junction and is therefore not subject to avalanche multiplication. At a
high enough BVCBo, the multiplication factor M becomes nominally infinite and the
region of breakdown is then attained. The current rises abruptly, and large changes
in current accompany small changes in applied voltage. The avalanche multipli-
cation factor depends on the voltage VCB between transistor’s collector and base. If
a current IE is caused to flow across the emitter junction, then, neglecting the
avalanche effect, a fraction a  IE , where a is the common-base current gain, reaches
the collector junction. If we take multiplication into account, IC has the magnitude
M  a  IE . In presence of avalanche multiplication, the transistor behaves as though
its common base current gain where M  a. The maximum allowable collector to
emitter voltage depends not only upon the transistor, but also upon the circuit in
which it is used.
BJT transistor second breakdown avalanche mode: When the collector current
rises above the data sheet limit ICmax a new breakdown mechanism happened, the
second breakdown. This phenomenon is caused by excessive heating of some
points (hot spots) in the base-emitter region of the bipolar junction transistor, which
give rise to an exponentially increasing current through these points. This expo-
nential rise of current in turn gives rise to even more overheating, originating a
positive thermal feedback mechanism. While analyzing the IC-VCE static charac-
teristic, the presence of this phenomenon is seen as a sharp collector voltage drop
and a corresponding almost vertical rise of the collector current. While this phe-
nomenon is destructive for bipolar junction transistors working in the usual way, it
can be used to push up further the current and voltage limits of a device working in
avalanche mode by limiting its time duration. The switching speed of the device is
not negatively affected.
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1009

Small signal model of the BJT, base charging capacitance (diffusion capaci-
tance). In active mode when the emitter-base is forward biased, the capacitance of
the emitter-base junction is dominated by the diffusion capacitance (not depletion
capacitance). Recall for a diode we define the following: CDiffusion ¼ dQ
dv0 ¼ dt  dv0 .
D dQD dt
D D
The sum up all minority carrier charges on either side of the junction.
Z1 v0
Z1 v0

pno  ðeVT  1Þ  eLP  dX þ q  A 


X
npo  ðeVT  1Þ  eLn  dX
D D X
QD ¼ q  A 
0 0

If we neglect charge injected from the base into the emitter due to p+ emitter in
R1 v0
D X
PNP then QD ¼ q  A  0 pno  ðeVT  1Þ  e LP  dX. Excess charge stored is due
almost entirely to the charge injected from the emitter. The BJT acts like a very
efficient “siphon”; As majority carriers from the emitter are injected into the base
and become “excess minority carriers”, the collector “siphons them” out of the
base. We can view the collector current as the amount of excess charge in the base
collected by the collector per unit time and we can express the charge due to the
excess hole concentration in the base as: QB ¼ ic  sF or the excess charge in the
base depends on the magnitude of current flowing and the “forward” base transport
W2
time, sF , the average time the carriers spend in the base. sF ¼ 2D B
, W is the base
quasi-neutral region width. DBis the minority carrier diffusion coefficient. Thus, the
diffusion capacitance is

@QB W2 @ic IC
CB ¼ jQpoint ¼ ð Þ j ; C B ¼ sF  ¼ s F  gm :
@vBE 2  DB @vBE Qpoint VT

The upper operational frequencyof the transistor is limited by the forward base
transport time f  2ps
1
F
. It is the similarity to the diode diffusion capacitance.

jpno  Lp þ npo  Ln j  q  A
CDiffusion ¼ gd  st ; st ¼ ;
IS
jpno  Lp þ npo  Ln j  q  A
CDiffusion ¼ gd 
IS

st is the transit time. In active mode for small forward biases the depletion
capacitance of the base-emitter junction can contribute to the total capacitance.

CjEo
CjE ¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 þ Vbi for Vemitterbase
EB

CjE  zero bias depletion capacitance.


Vbi for emitter-base  built in voltage for E-B junction. Thus, the emitter-base
capacitance is Cp = CB + CjE. In active mode when the collector-base is reverse
1010 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

biased, the capacitance of the collector-base junction is dominated by the depletion


capacitance (not diffusion capacitance).
Clo
Cl ¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi :
1 þ Vbi for collectorbase
VCB

Clo  zero bias depletion capacitance.


Vbi for collector-base  built in voltage for the B-C junction. In some integrated
BJTs (lateral BJTs in particular) the device has a capacitance to the substrate wafer
it is fabricated in. This results from a “buried” reverse biased junction. Thus, the
collector-substrate junction is reverse biased and the capacitance of the
collector-substrate junction is dominated by the depletion capacitance (not diffusion
capacitance).
Ccso
Ccs ¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi :
1 þ Vbi for collectorsubstrate
Vcs

Ccs  zero bias depletion capacitance.


Vbi for collector-substrate  built in voltage for the C substrate junction.
Small signal model of the BJT, parasitic resistances:
rb base resistance between metal inter connect and B-E junction.
rc parasitic collector resistance.
rex emitter resistance due to polysilicon contact.

Complete BJT small signal model: (Fig. C.6).


What set the maximum limits of operation of the BJT circuit? Forward active
mode lies between saturation and cutoff. Thus, the maximum voltage extremes that
one can operate an amplifier over can easily be found by examining the boundaries
between forward active and cutoff and the boundaries between forward active and
saturation. Output signals that exceed the voltage range that would keep the tran-
sistor within its forward active mode will result in “clipping” of the signal leading
to distortion. The maximum voltage swing allowed without clipping depends on the
DC bias points.
MOSFET transistor model:
The basic static model of MOSFET transistor (Shichman and Hodges) is as
follow (Fig. C.7):
 2

W VDS
IDS ¼ l0  Cox   ðVGS  VTH Þ  VDS 
Leff 2
1 W 2
IDSsat ¼  l0  Cox   ðVGS  VTH Þ
2 Leff
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1011

Fig. C.6 Complete BJT small signal model

Fig. C.7 MOSFET transistor


model graph

There is an empirical correction to these equations to account for the channel


length modulation:

W V2
IDS ¼ l0  Cox   ½ðVGS  VTH Þ  VDS  DS   ½1 þ k  VDS 
Leff 2
1 W
IDSsat ¼  l0  Cox   ðVGS  VTH Þ2  ½1 þ k  VDS 
2 Leff
1012 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

In the linear region:


 2

W VDS
IDS ¼ KP   ðVGS  VTH Þ  VDS   ½1 þ k  VDS 
ðL  2  Xjl Þ 2

In the saturation region:

KP W
IDsat ¼   ðVGS  VTH Þ2  ½1 þ k  VDS 
2 ðL  2  Xjl Þ

Xjl is the lateral diffusion parameter (Fig. C.8).


Threshold voltage (VTH): The threshold voltage changes with changes in
body-source voltage, VBS. The expression for threshold voltage
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
VTH ¼ VTO þ c  ð 2  /p  VBS  2  /p Þ

where VTO is the threshold voltage when the body-source voltage is zero, c is the
body effect parameter and Up is the surface inversion potential. If the bulk is
connected to the source (i.e. the MOSFET is acting as a 3 terminal device, the
threshold voltage is always equal to the value VTO). There is a depletion layer
which grows into the accumulation region and thus for a given VGS, cuts off the
channel. Need to add more VGS to re-establish the channel when we stacked
transistors in integrated circuits. If you connected bulk to source on each transistor
in an integrated circuit you would end up shorting many points in the circuit to
ground.

Fig. C.8 MOSFET transistor


structure and important
parameters
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1013

Complete DC model:
The model includes body-source and body-drain diodes. Equations used for the
diode model, for forward bias on the body-source/body-drain diodes (Fig. C.9):
VBS
h VBD i
IBS ¼ ISS  ½e Vt  1 þ GMIN  VBS ; IBD ¼ ISD  e Vt  1 þ GMIN  VBD

For the negative reverse bias on those diodes:

VBS VBD
IBS ¼ ISS  þ GMIN  VBS ; IBD ¼ ISD  þ GMIN  VBD
Vt Vt

MOSFET body diodes: The reverse bias terms are simply the first terms in a
power series expansion of the exponential term. The GMIN convergence resistance.
ISS and ISD are taken to be one constant in simulation.
DC MOSFET parameters: L = channel length, W = channel width, KP
(kp) = The trans-conductance parameter, VTO = Threshold voltage under zero bias
conditions, GAMMA (c) = Body effect parameter, PHI(Up) = surface inversion
potential, RS(RS) = source contact resistance, RD(RD) = Drain contact resistance,
LAMBDA(k) = channel length modulation parameter, XJ(Xjl) = lateral diffusion
parameter. IS(ISS, ISD) = reverse saturation current of body-drain/source diodes.
Large signal transient model: We add some capacitances to the DC model to
create the transient model to form the final transient model, as shown in Fig. C.10).
Capacitances: Static overlap capacitances between gate and drain (CGB0), gate
and source (CGS0), and gate and bulk (CGB0). These are fixed values, and are
specified per unit width. In saturation,
2
CGS ¼  C0x þ CGS0  W; CGD ¼ CGD0  W
3

Fig. C.9 MOSFET complete DC model


1014 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

Fig. C.10 MOSFET large signal transient model

In saturation after pinch-off, it is assumed that altering the drain voltage does not
have any effect on stored charge in the channel and thus the only capacitance
between gate and drain is the overlap capacitance.
In the linear/triode region, in this region the following equations are used:
(  2 )
VGS  VDS  VTH
CGS ¼ C0x  1  þ CGS0  W
2  ðVGS  VTH Þ  VDS
(  2 )
VGS  VTH
CGD ¼ C0x  1  þ CGD0  W
2  ðVGS  VTH Þ  VDS

As the device is moved further into the linear region, VGS becomes large
compared to (VDS–VTH) then the values of CGS and CGD become close to C0x/2
(plus the relevant overlap capacitance).
The body diode capacitances: The capacitances of the body diodes are given by
slightly modified expressions for junction capacitances of the diode model: The
C ð0Þ
expression for a PN diode capacitance: Cj ¼ pjffiffiffiffiffiffiffiVffi. The MOSFET equation is
1V
0

based on the following slightly modified equation:

Cj ð0Þ CjSW ð0Þ


Cj ¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi þ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi :
1  VV0 1  VV0

The junction capacitance is made up of two components. The main component, due
to Cj(0) is the normal junction capacitance. The second parameter is the perimeter
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1015

junction capacitance of the diffused source. The diffusion capacitance is zero in


reverse bias and the MOSFET must be operated with the bulk-drain and
bulk-sourceBulk-source diodes in reverse bias to stop large bulk currents flowing.
The additional parameters required for specifying the transient model in addition to
those required by the DC model are thus:
CGD0(CGD0) = Gate drain overlap capacitance per unit width of device.
CGS0(CGS0) = Gate source overlap capacitance per unit width of device.
CJ(Cj) = Zero bias depletion capacitance for body diodes.
CJSW(Cjsw) = Zero bias depletion perimeter capacitance for body diodes.
TOX(tox) = Oxide thickness (used for calculating Cox).
Bipolar transistor metrology and theory:
The interest topics regarding bipolar junction transistor (BJT) are operation, I-V
characteristics, current gain and output conductance. High level injection and heavy
doping induced band narrowing. SiGe transistor, transit time, and cutoff frequency
are important parameters. There are several bipolar transistor models which are
used (Ebers-Moll model, Small signal model, and charge control model). Each
model has its own areas of applications. The metal-oxide-semiconductor
(MOS) ICs have high density and low power advantages. The BJTs are preferred
in some high frequency and analog applications because of their high speed, low
noise, and high output power advantages such as in some cell phone amplifier
circuits. A small number of BJTs are integrated into a high density complementary
MOS (CMOS) chip integration of BJT and CMOS is known as the BiCMOS
technology. The term bipolar refers to the fact that both electrons and holes are
involved in the operation of a BJT. Minority carrier diffusion plays the leading role
as in the PN diode junction diode. A BJT is made of a heavily doped emitter, a
P-type base, and an N-type collector. This device is an NPN BJT, a PNP BJT would
have a P+ emitter, N-type base, and P-type collector. NPN transistor exhibit higher
trans conductance and speed than PNP transistors because the electron mobility is
larger than the hole mobility, BJTs are almost exclusively of the NPN type since
high performance is BJT’s competitive edge over MOSFETs (Fig. C.11).
When the base-emitter junction is forward biased, electrons are injected into the
more lightly doped base. They diffuse across the base to the reverse biased
base-collector junction which is the edge of the depletion layer and get swept into
the collector. This produces a collector current, IC. IC is independent of VCB as long
as VCB is a reverse bias or a small forward bias. IC is determined by the rate of
electron injection from the emitter into the base, determined by VBE. The rate of
qVBE
electron injection is proportional to e kT . The emitter is often connected to ground.
The emitter and collector are the equivalents of source and drain of a MOSFET
when the base is the equivalent of the gate. The ICcurve is usually plotted against
VCE. VCE = VCB + VBE, below VCE = 0.3 V the base-collector junction is strongly
forward biased and IC decreases. Because of the parasitic IR drops, it is difficult to
accurately ascertain the true base-emitter junction voltage. The easily measurable
1016 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

Fig. C.11 NPN BJT transistor voltages connection

base current IB is commonly used as the variable parameter in lieu of VBE, IC is


proportional to IB (Fig. C.12).
Collector current: The collector current is the output current of a BJT transistor.
Applying the electron diffusion equation to the base region gives in Fig. C.13

d 2 n0 n0 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi d 2 n0 n0
¼ 2 ; LB ¼ sB  DB ; 2 ¼ :
dx 2 LB dx sB  DB

Fig. C.12 NPN transistor structure, connections and graphs


Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1017

Fig. C.13 NPN transistor structure with depletion layers

sB and DB are the recombination lifetime and the minority carrier (electron)
diffusion constant in the base, respectively. The boundary conditions are as follow:
qVBE qVBC
n0 ð0Þ ¼ nB0  ðe kT  1Þ; n0 ðWB Þ ¼ nB0  ðe kT  1Þ  nB0  0:
n2
where nB0 ¼ NiB and NB is the base doping concentration. VBE is normally a
forward bias (positive value) and VBC is a reverse bias (negative value).
WB x
sinhð LB Þ
qVBE
We get the following expression for n0 ðxÞ ¼ nB0  ðe kT  1Þ  W . Modern
sinhð L B Þ
B
BJTs have base widths of about 0.1 lm. This is much smaller than the typical
diffusion length of tens of microns. In the case of WB LB we get the n0 ðxÞ
n2 qVBE
expression: n0 ðxÞ ¼ n0 ð0Þ  ð1  WxB Þ ¼ NiBB  ðe kT  1Þ  ð1  WxB Þ. niB is the intrinsic
carrier concentration of the base material. The subscript B, is added to ni because
the base may be made of a different semiconductor such as SiGe alloy, which has a
smaller band gap and therefore a larger ni than the emitter and collector material.
The minority carrier current is dominated by the diffusion current. The sign of IC is
positive and defined in the expression:
 
 dn n0 ð0Þ DB n2iB

qVBE
IC ¼ AE  q  DB   ¼ AE  q  DB  ¼ AE  q    ðe kT  1Þ:
dx WB WB N B

AE is the area of the BJT specifically the emitter area. There is a similarity between
BJT transistor IC current and the PN diode IV relation. Both are proportional to
qV Dn2i dn0
ðekT  1Þ and to N . The only difference is that dx has produced the W1B term due to the
qVBE
linear n′ profile. We can condense the expression of IC to IC ¼ Is  ðe kT  1Þ, where
qn2i qVBE n2
Is is the saturation current. IC ¼ AE  GB  ðe kT  1Þ and GB ¼ n2i  DNBB  WB
iB
n2i
¼ n2iB
 p
DB  WB , where p is the majority carrier concentration in the base. It is valid even
1018 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

for no uniform base and high level injection condition if Gb is generalized to 1.


R W n2
GB ¼ 0 B n2i  DpB  dx, GB has the unusual dimension of s/cm4 and is known as the base
iB
Gummel number. In the special case of niB ¼ ni , DBis a constant, and pðxÞ ¼ NB ðxÞ
RW
which is low level injection. GB ¼ D1B  0 B NB ðxÞ  dx ¼ D1B  base dopant atoms
per unit area. The base Gummel number is basically proportional to the base dopant
density per area. The higher the base dopant density is, the lower the IC will be for a
given VBE. The concept of a Gummel number simplifies the IC model because it
contains all the subtleties of transistor design that affect IC; changing base material
through niB ðxÞ, non-constant DB, non-uniform base dopant concentration through
pðxÞ ¼ NB ðxÞ and even the high level injection condition, where p > NB. Although
many factors affect GB, GB can be easily determined from the Gummel plot. The
inverse slope of the straight line can be described as 60 mV per decade. The
extrapolated intercept of the straight line and VBE = 0 yields Is. GB is equal to AE 
q  n2i divided by the intercept (Fig. C.14).
The decrease in the slope of the curve at high IC is called the high level injection
effect. At large VBE, n′ can become larger than the base doping concentration NB,
n0 ¼ p0 NB . The condition of n0 ¼ p0 NB is called high level injection.
A consequence is that in the base
qVBE qVBE
n  p  ni  e 2kT ; GB / ni  e 2kT
qVBE qVBE
Yield to Ic / ni  e 2kT . Therefore, at high VBE or high IC, Ic / e 2kT and the
inverse slope becomes 120 mV/decade. IKF, the knee current, is the current at
which the slope changes. It is a useful parameter in the BJT model for circuit
simulation. The IR drop in the parasitic resistance significantly increases VBE at
very high IC and further flattens the curve.
Base current: Whenever the base-emitter junction is forward biased, some holes
are injected from the P-type into the N+ emitter. These holes are provided by the
base current IB, IB is an undesirable but inevitable side effect of producing IC by

Fig. C.14 NPN transistor Ic


[A] versus VBE [volt]
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1019

forward biasing the BE junction. The analysis of IB, the base to emitter injection
current, is a perfect parallel of the IC analysis. The base current can be expressed as

ZWE
q  n2i qVBE n2i p
IB ¼ AE   ðe kT  1Þ; GE ¼   dx:
GE n2iE DE
0

GE is the emitter Gummel number. In case of uniform emitter, where niE ; NE


(emitter doping concentration) and DE are not functions of x (Fig. C.15).

DE n2iE qVBE
IB ¼ A E  q    ðe kT  1Þ:
WE NE

Current gain: The most important DC parameter of a BJT is its common emitter
current gain bF. Another current ratio, the common base current gain, is defined by
aF. bF  IICB ; IC ¼ aF  IE ; aF ¼ IICE ¼ IC IþC IB ¼ ICI=IC =I B
B þ1
¼ 1 þbFb . aF is typically very
F

close to unity, such as 0.99, because bF is large. aF ¼ 1 þbFb ;


F
bF ¼ 1a
aF
F
. I B is a load on the input signal source, an undesirable side effect of
forward biasing the BE junction. IB should be minimized (bF should be maxi-
D W N n2
mized). bF ¼ GGEB ¼ DBE WEB NEB n2iB . A typical good bF is 100. D and W cannot be
iE
changed very much. The most obvious way to achieve a high bF, is to use a large
NE and a small NB. A small NB, would introduce too large a base resistance, which
degrades the BJT’s ability to operate at high current and high frequencies. Typically
NB is around 1018 cm−3. An emitter is said to be efficient if the emitter current is
mostly the useful electron current injected into the base with little useless hole
current (the base current). The emitter efficiency is defined as
cE ¼ IE II
E
B
¼ IC IþC IB ¼ 1 þ G1B =GE . To raise bF, NE is typically made larger than
1020 cm−3. When NE is very large, n2iE becomes larger than n2i . This is called the
Eg
heavy doping effect. n2i ¼ NC  NV  ekT , heavy doping can modify the Si crystal
sufficient to reduce Eg and cause n2i to increase significantly. Therefore, the heavy
DEgE
doping effect is also known as band gap narrowing. n2iE ¼ n2i  e kT , DEgE is the

Fig. C.15 NPN transistor structure electron flow and hole flow
1020 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

narrowing of the emitter band gap relative to lightly doped Si and is negligible for
NE < 1018 cm−3, 50 meV at 1019 cm−3, 95 meV cm−3 at 1020 cm−3, and 140 meV
at 1021 cm−3. To further elevate bF, we can raise niB by using a base material that
has a smaller band gap than the emitter material. Si1g Geg is an excellent base
material candidate for an Si emitter. With η = 0.2, EgB is reduced by 0.1 eV. In a
SiGe BJT, the base is made of high quality P-type epitaxial SiGe. In practice, η is
graded such that η = 0 at the emitter end of the base and 0.2 at the drain end to
create a built in field that improves the speed of the BJT. Because the emitter and
base junction is made of two different semiconductors, the device is known as a
heterojunction bipolar transistor or HBT. HBTs made of InP emitter (Eg = 1.35 eV)
and InGaAs base (Eg = 0.68 eV) and GaAlAs emitter with GaAs base are other
examples of well-studied HBTs. The ternary semiconductors are used to achieve
lattice constant matching at the heterojunction. Whether the base material is SiGe or
plain Si, a high performance BJT would have a relatively thick (>100 nm) layer of
As doped N+ poly-Si film in the emitter. Arsenic is thermally driven into the “base”
by *20 nm and converts that single crystalline layer into a part of the N+ emitter.
This way, bF is larger due to the large WE, mostly made of the N+ poly-Si. This is
the poly-Silicon emitter technology. The simpler alternative, a deeper implanted or
diffused N+ emitter without the poly-Si film, is known to produce a higher density
of crystal defects in the thin base causing excessive emitters to collector leakage
current or even shorts in a small number of the BJTs. High speed circuits operate at
high IC, and low power circuits may operate at low IC. Current gain b, drops at both
high IC and at low IC. In Gummel plot the IC flattens at high VBE due to the high
level injection effect in the base. That IC curve arising from hole injection into the
emitter, does not flatten due to this effect because the emitter is very heavily doped,
and it is practically impossible to inject a higher density of holes than NE. Over a
wide mid-range of IC, IC and IB are parallel, indicating that the ratio IC/IB, i.e., bF is
a constant. Above 1mA, the slope of IC drops due to high level injection.
Consequently, the IC/IB ratio or bF decreases rapidly. This fall-off of current gain
unfortunately degrades the performance of BJTs at high current where the BJTs
speed is the highest. IB is the base emitter junction forward bias current. The
forward bias current slope decreases at low VBE or very low current due to the
Space Charge Region (SCR) current. As a result, the IC/IB ratio or bF decreases at
very low IC.
@IC
As in MOSFETs, a large output conductance, @V CE
, of BJTs is deleterious to the
voltage gain of circuits. The cause of the output conductance is base-width modu-
lation. The thick vertical line indicates the location of the base-collector junction.
With increasing Vce, the base-collector depletion region widens and the neutral base
width decreases. This leads to an increase in IC. If the curves IC–VCE are extrapo-
lated, they intercept the IC = 0 axis at approximately the same point. VA is defined as
early voltage. VA is a parameter that describes the flatness of the IC curves.
@IC 1
Specifically, the output resistance can be expressed as VA/IC: r0  ð@V CE
Þ ¼ VICA .
A large VA (large r0) is desirable for high voltage gains. A typical VA is 50 V. VA is
sensitive to the transistor design. We can except VA and r0 to increase, expect the
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1021

base width modulation to be a smaller fraction of the base width, if we increase the
base width, increase the base doping concentration NB or decrease the collector
doping concentration NC. Increasing the base width would reduce the sensitivity to
any given DWB. Increasing the base doping concentration NB would reduce the
depletion region thickness on the base side because the depletion region penetrates
less into the more heavily doped side of a PN junction. Decreasing the collector
doping concentration NC would tend to move the depletion region into the collector
and thus reduce the depletion region thickness on the base side, too. Both increasing
the base width and the base doping concentration NB would depress bF. Decreasing
the collector doping concentration NC is the most acceptable course of action. It is
also reduces the base-collector junction capacitance, which is a good thing.
Therefore, the collector doping is typically ten times lighter than the base doping.
The larger slopes at VCE > 3v are caused by impact ionization. The rise of IC due to
base-width modulation is known as the early effect. Model the collector current as a
function of the collector voltage: IC ¼ bF  IB and differentiating with respect to VC
@IC @bF
while IB was held constant gave, @V C
¼ IB  @V C
. The question is how can bF change
with VC, the collector depletion layer thickens as collector voltage is raised. The base
gets thinner and current gain raises. Bipolar transistor transit time and charge stor-
age: Static IV characteristics are only one part of the BJT theory. Another part is its
dynamic behavior or its speed. When the BE junction is forward biased, excess holes
are stored in the emitter, the base, and even the depletion layers. The sum of all
excess hole charges everywhere QF. QF is the stored excess carrier charge. If
QF = 1pC (Pico coulomb), there is +1 pC of excess hole charge and −1 pC of excess
electron charge stored in the BJT. The ratio of QF to IC is called the forward transit
time sF (sF  QICF ). Ic and QF are related by a constant ratio sF. QF and therefore sF are
very difficult to predict accurately for a complex device structure. sF can be measured
experimentally and once sF is determined for a given BJT, equation sF  QICF
becomes a powerful conceptual and mathematical tool giving QF as a function of IC,
and vice versa. sF sets a high frequency limit of BJT operation. The excess hole
W2
charge in the base QFB: QFB ¼ q  AE  n0 ð0Þ  WB =2; QICFB  sFB ¼ 2DBB . The base
transit time can be further reduced by building into the base a drift field that aids the
flow of electrons from the emitter to the collector. There are two ways of accom-
plishing this. The classical method is to use graded base doping (a large NB near the
EB junction), which gradually decreases toward the CB junction. Such a doping
gradient is automatically achieved if the base is produced by dopant diffusion. The
changing NB creates a dEv =dx and a dEc =dx. This means that there is a drift field.
Any electron injected into the base would drift toward the collector with a base
W2
transit time shorter than the diffusion transit time, 2DBB . In a SiGe BJT, P-type
epitaxial Si1g Geg is grown over the Si collector with a constant NB and η linearly
varying from about 0.2 at the collector end to 0 at the emitter end. A large dEc =dx can
be produced by the grading of EgB . These high speed BJTs are used in high fre-
quency communication circuits. Drift transistors can have a base transit time several
1022 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

W2
times less than 2DBB , as short as 1psec. The total forward transit time, sF is known as
the emitter to collector transit time. sFB is only one portion of sF. The base transit
time typically contributes about half of sF. To reduce the transit (or storage) time in
the emitter and collector, the emitter and the depletion layers must be kept thin. sF
can be measured. sF starts to increase at a current density where the electron density
corresponding to the dopant density in the collector (n = NC) is insufficient to
support the collector current even if the dopant induced electrons move at the
saturation velocity. This intriguing condition of too few dopant atoms and too much
current is lead to a reversal of the sign of the charge density in the depletion region.

IC d}ðxÞ q
IC ¼ AE  q  n  vsat ; q ¼ q  NC  q  n ¼ q  NC  ; ¼ :
AE  vsat dx es

when IC is small then qðq ¼ q  NC Þ as expected from the PN junction analysis,


and the electric field in the depletion layer. The N+ collector is always present to
reduce the series resistance. No depletion layer is shown in the base for simplicity
because the base is much more heavily doped than the collector. As IC increases, q
decreases and d}ðxÞ
dx decreases. The electric field drops to zero in the very heavily
doped N+ collector as expected. Because of the base widening, sF increases as a
consequence. This is called the Kirk effect. Base widening can be reduced by
increasing NC and VCE. The Kirk effect limits the peak BJT operating speed.
Bipolar transistor small signal model: The equivalent circuit for the behavior of a
BJT in response to a small input signal (10 mV sinusoidal signal, superimposed on
the DC bias) is presented in Fig. C.16. BJTs are often operated in this manner in
analog circuits.
qVBE
If VBE is not close to zero, the “1” in IC ¼ Is  ðe kT  1Þ is negligible; in that
case
qVBE qVBE
IC ¼ Is  ðe kT  1Þ  Is  e kT :

Fig. C.16 Bipolar transistor small signal model


Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1023

When a signal vBE is applied to the BE junction, a collector current gm  vBE is


produced. gm, the trans-conductance, is

dIC d qVBE q qVBE kT kT


gm  ¼ ðIs  e kT Þ ¼  Is  e kT ¼ IC = ; gm ¼ I C =
dVBE dVBE kT q q

At room temperature, gm ¼ IC =26 mV. The trans-conductance is determined by


the collector bias current, IC. The input node, the base, appears to the input drive
circuit as a parallel RC circuit. r1p ¼ dV dIB
BE
¼ b1  dV
dIC
BE
¼ gbm ; rp ¼ bgmF . QF is the excess
F F
carrier charge stored in the BJT. If QF = 1 pC, there is +1pC of excess holes and
−1pC of excess electrons in the BJT. All the excess hole charge, QF, is supplied by
the base current, IB. Therefore, the base presents this capacitance to the input drive
circuit: Cp ¼ dV
dQF
BE
¼ dVdBE ½sF  IC  ¼ sF  gm . The capacitance CP may be called the
charge storage capacitance, known as the diffusion capacitance. There is one charge
component that is not proportional to IC and therefore cannot be included in QF.
That is the junction depletion layer charge. Therefore, a complete model of CP
should include the BE junction depletion layer capacitance, CdBE,
Cp ¼ sF  gm þ CdBE . Once the parameters in the basic small signal model of the
BJT have been determined, one can use the small signal model to analyze circuits
with arbitrary signal source impedance network which composing resistors,
capacitors, and inductors, and additionally load impedance network. r0 is the in-
trinsic output resistance, VA/IC. Cl also arises from base width modulation; when
VBC varies, the base width varies; therefore, the base stored charge varies, thus
giving rise to Cl ¼ dQ dVCB . CdBC is the CB junction depletion layer capacitance.
FB

Model parameters are difficult to predict from theory with the accuracy required for
commercial circuit design. Therefore, the parameters are routinely determined
through comprehensive measurement of the BJT AC and DC characteristics.
Figure C.17 describes the small signal model which can be used to analyze a
BJT circuit by hand.
Cutoff frequency: We consider small signal model when the load is a short
circuit. The signal source is a current source ib, at a frequency f. The question is at
what frequency the AC current gain does b  ic =ib fall to unity?

ib ib
vbe ¼ ¼ ; ic ¼ gm  vbe
input admittance 1=rp þ j  x  Cp
 
ic  gm 1
bðxÞ    ¼ ¼
ib j1=rp þ j  x  Cp j j1=gm  rp þ j  x  sF þ j  x  CdBE =gm j
1
¼
j1=bF þ j  x  sF þ j  x  CdBE  k  T=q  IC j
1024 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

Fig. C.17 Bipolar transistor small signal model which can be used to analyze a BJT circuit by
hand

Fig. C.18 Bipolar transistor small signal model for circuit simulation

Figure C.18 describes the small signal model for circuit simulation by computer.
At x = 0, i.e., DC b(x) = … equation reduces to bF as expected. As x increases,
b drops. By carefully analyzing the b(x) data, one can determine sF. If bF 1 so
that 1/bF is negligible, bðxÞ / x1 and b = 1 at fT , fT ¼ 2pðsF þ CdBE 1
kT=qIC Þ.
If we use a more complete small signal model, it can be shown that
fT ¼ 2p½sF þ ðCdBE þ CdBC ÞkT=ðqI
1
C Þ þ CdBC ðre þ rc Þ
. fT is the cutoff frequency and is com-
monly used to compare the speed of transistors. The above equations predict that fT
rises with increasing IC due to increasing gm, in agreement with the measured fT. At
very high IC, sF increases due to base widening (Kirk effect), and therefore, fT falls.
BJTs are often biased near the IC where fT peaks in order to obtain the best high
frequency performance. FT is the frequency of unity power gain. The frequency of
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1025

qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
unity power gain, called the maximum oscillation frequency. fmax ¼ ð8prfbTCdBC Þ, it
is therefore important to reduce the base resistance, rb. While MOSFET scaling is
motivated by the need for high packing density and large Idsat, BJT scaling is often
motivated by the need for high fT and fmax. This involves the reduction of sF (thin
base, etc,) and the reduction of parasitic (CdBE ; CdBC ; rb ; re ; rc ). We interested in
BJT with poly-Si emitter, self-aligned base, and deep trench isolation. The base is
contacted through two small P+ regions created by boron diffusion from a P+
poly-Si film. The film also provides a low resistance electrical connection to the
base without introducing a large P+ junction area and junction capacitance. To
minimizing the base series resistance, the emitter opening is made very narrow. The
lightly doped epitaxial N-type collector is contacted through a heavily doped
sub-collector in order to minimize the collector series resistance. The substrate is
lightly doped to minimize the collector capacitance. Both the shallow trench and the
deep trench are filled with dielectrics (SiO2) and serve the function of electrical
isolation. The deep trench forms a rectangular moat that completely surrounds the
BJT. It isolates the collector of this transistor from the collectors of neighboring
transistors. The structure incorporates many improvements that have been devel-
oped over the past decades and have greatly reduced the device size from older BJT
design. BJT is a larger transistor than a MOSFET.
Bipolar transistor charge control model: The small signal model is ideal for
analyzing circuit response to small sinusoidal signals. If the signal is large, input is
step function IB switching from zero to 20 lA or by any IB(t) and then IC(t) is
produced. The response is analyzed with the charge control model which is a simple
extension of the charge storage concept. IC ¼ QsFF ) IC ðtÞ ¼ QsFFðtÞ, IC(t) becomes
known if we solve for QF ðtÞ. sF has to be characterized beforehand for the BJT being
used. IC is controlled by QF (charge control model). At DC condition IB ¼ bIC ¼ sFQbF ,
F F
the equation has a straightforward physical meaning. In order to sustain a constant
excess hole charge in the transistor, holes must be supplied to the transistor through
IB to replenish the holes that are lost to recombination. Therefore, DC IB is pro-
portional to QF. When holes are supplied by IB at the rate of QF =sF  bF , the rate of
hole supply is exactly equal to the rate of hole loss to recombination and QF remains
at a constant value. In the case that IB is larger than QF =sF  bF .
(IB [ QF =sF  bF ), holes flow into the BJT at a higher rate than the rate of hole
loss and the stored hole charge QF increases with time (dQ dt ¼ IB ðtÞ  sF bF ).
F QF

The presented equations together constitute the basic charge control model.
For any given IB(t), equation dQ dt ¼ IB ðtÞ  sF bF can be solved for QF(t) ana-
F QF

lytically or by numerical integration. Once QF(t) is found, IC(t) becomes known


from equation IC ðtÞ ¼ QsFFðtÞ. Figure C.19 describes the charge control model. Excess
hole charge QF rises or falls at the rate of supply current IB minus loss (/QF ).
QF is the amount of charges in the vessel, and sFQbF is the rate of charge leakage.
F
IB is the rate of charges flowing into the vessel. The above figure is a basic version
of the charge control model. We can introduce the junction depletion layer
1026 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

Fig. C.19 Bipolar transistor IB(t) QF/(τ F·βF)


charge controlmodel QF(t)

capacitances into equation dQ dt ¼ IB ðtÞ  sF bF . Diverting part of IB to charge the


F QF

junction capacitances would produce an additional delay in IC(t).


Bipolar transistor model for large signal circuit simulation: The BJT model used
in circuit simulation can accurately represent the DC and dynamic currents of the
transistor in response to VBE(t) and VCE(t). A typical circuit simulation model or
compact model is made of the Ebers-Moll model when VBE and VBC are two
driving forces for IC and IB, plus additional enhancements for high level injection,
voltage dependent capacitances that accurately represent the charge storage in the
transistor, and parasitic resistances as shown. This BJT model is known as the
Gummel-Poon model. The two diodes represent the two IB terms due to VBE and
VBC. The capacitor labeled QF is voltage dependent such that the charge stored in it
is equal to the QF described in the bipolar transistor transit time and charge storage
discussion. QR is the counterpart of QF produced by a forward bias at the BC
junction. Inclusion of QR makes the dynamic response of the model accurate even
when VBC is sometimes forward biased. CBE and CBC are the junction depletion
layer capacitances. CCS is the collector to substrate capacitance (Fig. C.20).
qVBE qVBC VCB Is qVBC
IC ¼ Is0  ðe kT e kT Þ  ð1 þ Þ   ðe kT  1Þ:
VA bR

The 1 þ VVCBA factor is added to represent the early effect—IC increasing with
increasing VCB. Is0 differs from Is in that Is0 decreases at high VBE due to the high
level injection effect in accordance with equation

ZWB
n2i p
GB    dx:
n2iB DB
0

Is qVBE Is qVBC qVBE


IB ¼  ðe kT  1Þ þ  ðe kT  1Þ þ ISE  ðenE kT  1Þ:
bF bR

ISE and nE parameters are determined from the measured BJT data as are all of
the several dozens of model parameters. We can summery the current appendix
discussion, that base emitter junction is usually forward biased while the
base-collector junction is reverse biased. VBE determines the rate of electron
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1027

Fig. C.20 Bipolar transistor BJT model used for circuit simulation

injection from the emitter into the base, and thus uniquely determines the collector
current, IC regardless of the reverse bias VCB.

ZWB
q  n2i qVBE n2i p
IC ¼AE   ðe kT 1Þ; GB    dx
GB n2iB DB
0

GB is the base Gummel number, which represents all the subtleties of BJT
design that affects IC; base material, non-uniform base doping, non-uniform ma-
terial composition, and the high level injection effect. An undesirable but
unavoidable side effect of the application on VBE is a hole current flowing from the
base, mostly into the emitter. This base input current, IB, is related to IC by the
common emitter current gain bF (bF ¼ IICB  GGEB ) where GE is the emitter Gummel
number. The common base current gain is aF  IICE ¼ 1 þbFb . The Gummel plot
F
1028 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

indicates that bF falls off in the high IC region due to high level injection in the base
and also in the low IC region due to excess base current. Base width modulation by
VCB results in a significant slope of the IC-VCEcurve in the active region. This is the
early effect. The slope, called the output conductance, limits the voltage gain that
can be produced with a BJT. The early effect can be suppressed with a lightly doped
collector. A heavily doped sub-collector is routinely used to reduce the collector
resistance. Due to the forward bias, VBE, a BJT stores a certain amount of excess
hole charge, which is equal but of opposite sign to the excess electron charge. Its
magnitude is called the excess carrier charge, QF. QF is linearly proportional to IC
(QF  IC  sF ).
sF is the forward transit time. If there were no excess carriers stored outside the
W2
base sF ¼ sFB ¼ 2DBB . sFB is the base transit time, sF [ sFB because excess carrier
storage in the emitter and in the depletion layer is also significant. All these regions
should be made small in order to minimize sF. Besides minimizing the base width,
WB, sFB may be reduced by building a drift field into the base with graded base
doping (also with graded Ge content in a SiGe base). sFB is significantly increased
at large IC due to base widening which known at the Kirk effect. In the Gummel
Poon model, both the DC and the dynamic (charge storage) currents are well
modeled. The early effect and high level injection effect are included. Simpler
models consisting of R, C, and current source are used for hand analysis of circuits.
The small signal models employ parameters such as trans-conductance gm ¼ dV dIC
BE
¼
IC = kT
q and input capacitance Cp ¼ dVBE ¼ dVBE ½sF  IC  ¼ sF  gm and input resis-
dQF d

bF
tance rp ¼ dVdIB ¼ gm . The BJT’s unity gain cutoff frequency at which b falls to unity
BE

is fT. In order to raise device speed, device density, or current gain, a modern high
performance BJT usually employs poly-Si emitter, self-aligned poly-Si base con-
tacts, graded Si-Ge base, shallow oxide trench, and deep trench isolation. High
performance BJTs excel over MOSFETs in circuits requiring the highest device gm
and speed.
Gummel-Pooncharge control model: The Gummel-Poon model is a detailed
charge-controlled model of BJT dynamics, which has been adopted and elaborated
by others to explain transistor dynamics in greater detail than the terminal-based
models typically do. This model also includes the dependence of transistor b values
upon the DC current levels in the transistor, which are assumed current independent
in the Ebers-Moll model. A significant effect included in the Gummel-Poon model
is the DC current variation of the transistor bF and bR. When certain parameters are
omitted, the Gummel-Poon model reverts to the simpler Ebers-Moll model. The
basic circuit which describes the Gummel-Poon model is the large signal schematic.
It represents the physical transistor, a current-controlled output current sink, and
two diode structures including their capacitors (Fig. C.21).
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1029

Fig. C.21 Gummel-Poon large signal schematic of the BJT

We can derive from the Gummel-Poon large signal schematics of the bipolar
transistor the Small Signal (SS) schematics for high frequency simulations. This
mean, for a given operating point, the DC currents are calculated and the model is
linearized in this point. The schematic is a pure linear model. The AC Small Signal
(SS) schematic of bipolar transistor is described in Fig. C.22.
For simplicity we assume no voltage drops at RBB′, Rc, RE then VB′E′ = VBE,
VB′C′ = VBC, VC′E′ = VCE.
The Gummel-Poon BJT full model analysis: The Gummel-Poon model is a
compact model for bipolar junction transistors (BJT) which also takes into account
effects of low currents and at high level injection (Fig. C.23).
Remark: we consider no voltage drop on RBB′, Rc, RE (VEE0 ! e; VCC0 ! e;
VBB0 ! e).
Gmin is the minimum conductance which is automatically switched in parallel to
each PN junction.
1030 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

Fig. C.22 AC small signal schematic of the bipolar transistor

Iss qVbe
Iss qVbc Iss qVbe qVbc
Icc ¼  ðenf kB T  1Þ; Iec ¼  ðenr kB T  1Þ; Ict ¼ Icc  Iec ¼  ðenf kB T  enr kB T Þ
qb qb qb
Iec Iss qVbc I cc I ss
qVbe

ID1 ¼ ¼  ðenr kB T  1Þ; ID3 ¼ ¼  ðenf kB T  1Þ


br qb  br bf qb  bf
qVbc qVbe
ID2 ¼ C4  Iss  ðencl kB T  1Þ; ID4 ¼ C2  Iss  ðenel kB T  1Þ

The model distinguishes four operating region: normal active region, inverse
region, saturated region, and off region.
Normal active region:

5  nf  k B  T 5  nr  k B  T
Vbe [  ; Vbc  
q q

Is q  Vbe qb Vbe 1 1
Ic ¼  ½expð Þ þ  þ C4  Is þ ½  ð þ Þ  Vbc   Gmin
qb nf  k B  T br qb q b br
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1031

Fig. C.23 Gummel-Poon BJT full model

1 q  Vbe 1 q  Vbe
Ib ¼ Is  ½  ½expð Þ  1   þ C2  Is  ½expð Þ  1
bf nf  k B  T br nel  kB  T
Vbe Vbc
 C4  Is þ ð þ Þ  Gmin
bf br
5nf kB T
Inverse region: Vbe   q ; Vbc [  5nr qkB T

Is q  Vbc qb q  Vbc
Ic ¼   fexpð Þ þ  ½expð Þ  1g
qb nr  k B  T br nr  k B  T
q  Vbc Vbe 1 1
 C4  Is  ½expð Þ  1 þ ½  ð þ Þ  Vbc   Gmin
ncl  kB qb q b br
1032 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model

Fig. C.24 BJT NPN Gummel-Poon static model

1 q  Vbe 1 q  Vbe
Ib ¼ Is  ½  ½expð Þ  1   þ C2  Is  ½expð Þ  1
bf nf  k B  T br nel  kB  T
Vbe Vbc
 C4  Is þ ð þ Þ  Gmin
bf br
5nf kB T
Saturated region: Vbe [  q ; Vbc [  5nr qkB T

Is q  Vbe q  Vbc qb q  Vbc


Ic ¼  f½expð Þ  expð Þ   ½expð Þ  1g
qb nf  k B  T nr  k B  T br nr  k B  T
q  Vbc Vbe 1 1
 C4  Is  ½expð Þ  1 þ ½  ð þ Þ  Vbc   Gmin
ncl  kB qb qb b r
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1033

1 q  Vbe 1 q  Vbc
Ib ¼ Is  f  ½expð Þ  1 þ  ½expð Þ  1g
bf nf  k B  T br nr  k B  T
q  Vbe q  Vbc Vbe Vbc
þ C2  Is  ½expð Þ  1 þ C4  Is  ½expð Þ  1 þ ð þ Þ  Gmin
nel  kB  t ncl  kB  T bf br

5nf kB T
Off region:Vbe   q ; Vbc   5nr qkB T

Is Vbe 1 1
Ic ¼ þ C 4  Is þ ½  ð þ Þ  Vbc   Gmin ;
br qb q b br
bf þ br Vbe Vbc
Ib ¼ Is  ½   ðC2 þ C4 Þ  Is þ ð þ Þ  Gmin
bf  br bf br

By disconnecting all capacitor in Gummel-Poon BJT full model we get the NPN
Gummel-Poon static model (Fig. C.24).
References

1. Kawdungta, S., Phongcharoenpanich, C., & Torrungrueng, D. (2008). Novel design of


double loop antennas by using a shifted Gate for the LF–RFID system. Asian University,
Thailand: Faculty of engineering and Technology.
2. Kuznetsov, Y. A. (1995). Elements of applied bifurcation theory. Applied Mathematical
Sciences.
3. Hale, J. K. (2012). Dynamics and bifurcations. Texts in Applied Mathematics, 3.
4. Strogatz, S. H. (2014). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos. Boulder: Westview press.
5. Kuang, Y. (1993). Delay differential equations with applications in population dynamics.
Boston: Academic Press.
6. Beretta, E., & Kuang, Y. (2002). Geometric stability switch criteria in delay differential
systems with delay dependent parameters. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 33,
1144–1165.
7. Aluf, O. (2008, May). RFID TAGs COIL’s dimensional parameters optimization as
excitable linear bifurcation systems. In IEEE COMCAS2008 Conference.
8. Aluf, O. (2011, November). RFID TAGs coil’s system stability optimization under delayed
electromagnetic interferences. In IEEE COMCAS2011 Conference.
9. Guckenheimer, J. (2002). Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of
vector fields. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 42.
10. Wiggins, S. (2003). Introduction to applied nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos. Text in
Applied Mathematics (Hardcover).
11. Haug, H., & Koch, S. W. (2008). Quantum theory of the optical and electronic properties
of semiconductors (5th ed.). Singapore: World Scientific.
12. Kuang, J., & Cong, Y. (2007). Stability of numerical methods for delay differential
equations. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
13. Balachandran, B., & Kalmár-Nagy, T., & Gilsinn, D. E. (2009, March 5). Delay differential
equations: Recent advances and new directions (1st ed.) (Hardcover). Heidelberg: Springer.
14. Sze, S. M., & Ng, K. K. (2006). Physics of semiconductor devices. New York: Wiley
Interscience (Hardcover—Oct 27).
15. Sah, C. T. Fundamentals of solid state electronics. Singapore: World Scientific.
16. Yang, W. Y., Cao, W., Chung, T.-S., & Morris, J. (2005). Applied numerical methods using
MATLAB. New York: Wiley.
17. Band, A., & Unguris, J. Optically isolated current-to-voltage converter for an electron
optics system. Electron physics group National Institute of Standards and technology
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899.
18. Beretta, E., & Kuang, Y. (2002). Geometric stability switch criteria in delay differential
systems with delay dependent parameters. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 33(5),
1144–1165 (Published electronically February 14, 2002).
19. Kuang, Y. (1993). Delay differential equations with applications in population dynamics.
Mathematics in Science and Engineering, 191.

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 1035


O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6
1036 References

20. Flower, A. C., & Mcguinnless, M. J. (1982). A description of the Lorenz attractor at high
prandtl number. Physica 5D, 149–182.
21. Dullin, H. R., Schmidt, S., Richter, P. H., & Grossmann, S. K. (2005, April 12). Extended
phase diagram of the Lorenz model.
22. Sprott, J. C. Simplifications of the Lorenz attractor. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and
Life Sciences, 13(3), 271–278.
23. van der Schrier, G., & Mass, L. R. M. (2000). The diffusionless Lorenz equations;
Shil’nikov bifurcations and reduction to an explicit map. Physica D, 141, 19–36.
24. Marton, L. (1974). Advanced electronics and electron physics (Vol. 35). USA: Academic
Press Inc. Elsevier.
25. Cripps, S. C. (2006). RF power amplifiers for wireless communication. London: Artech
House microwave library.
26. Sayre, C. W. Complete wireless design. New York: McGraw-Hill companies.
27. Gopalsamy, K. Stability and oscillation in delay differential equations of population
dynamics. Berlin: Kluwer Academic publishers.
28. Kuznetsov, Y. (2010). Elements of applied bifurcation theory [Paperback]. NY, LLC:
Springer.
29. Butcher, E. A., Ma, H., Bueler, E., Averina, V., & Szabo, Z. (2004). Stability of linear time
periodic delay differential equations via Chebyshev polynomials. International Journal of
Numerical Methods Engineering, 59, 895–922.
30. Stepan, G., Insperger, T., & Szalai, R. (2005). Delay, parametric excitation, and the
nonlinear dynamics of cutting process. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 15
(9), 2783–2798.
31. Insperger, T., & Stepan, G. (2003). Stability of the damped Mathieu equation with time
delay. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 125.
32. Garg, N. K., Mann, B. P., Kim, N. H., & Kurdi, M. H. (2007, March). Stability of a time
delayed system with parametric excitation. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and
Control, 129.
33. Allan, W. S. (2005). Understanding microwaves. New York: Wiley.
34. Rogers, J. W. M., Plett, C., & Marsland, I. (2014). Radio frequency system architecture and
design. London: Artech house.
35. Linkhart, D. K. (2014). Microwave circulator design (2nd ed.). London: Artech house.
36. Tanaka, S., Shimomura, N., & Ohtake, K. (1965, March). Active circulators—The
realization of circulators using transistors. Proceedings of the IEEE, 260–267.
37. Dougherty, R. (1989, June). Circulate signals with active devices on monolithic chips.
Microwave and RF, 85–86, 89.
38. Looss, G., & Joseph, D. D. (1980). Elementary stability and bifurcation theory. Berlin:
Springer.
39. Guckenheimer, J., & Holmes, P. (1983). Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and
bifurcation of vector fields. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 42.
40. Perko, L. (1991). Differential equations and dynamics systems. Texts in Applied
Mathematics, 7.
41. Kuang, J., & Cong, Y. (2005). Stability of numerical methods for delay differential
equations. USA: Since press USA Inc.
42. Hollenstein, C., Guittienne, p., & Howling, A. A. Resonant RF network antennas for
large-area and large-volume inductively coupled plasma sources.
43. Granas, A., & Dugundji, J. (2003, July 24). Fixed point theory. Berlin: Springer.
44. Border, K. C. (1989, July 28). Fixed point theorems with application to economics and
game theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Rep sub edition).
45. Agarwal, R. P., Meehan, M., &O’Regan, D. (2009, March 19). Fixed point theory and
applications (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Istratescu, V. I. (2001, November 30). Fixed point theory: An introduction. Berlin:
Springer.
References 1037

47. Geller, S. B., & Mantek, P. A. (1962, January–March). Tunnel diode large-signal
equivalent circuit study and the solutions of its nonlinear differential equations. Journal of
research of the National Bureau of Standards—C. Engineering and Instrumentation, 66C
(1).
48. Hines, M. E. (1960). High-frequency negative-resistance circuit principles for Esaki diode
applications. Bell System Technical Journal, 39, 477.
49. Cohen, S. (1960). Tunnel diode characterization. Electric Equipment & Engineering, 8,
102.
50. Lowry, H. R., Giorgis, J., Gottlieb, E., & Weischedel, R. C. (1961). Tunnel diode manual.
General Electric, 33–42.
51. Lefshetz, S. (1957). Differential equations: Geometric theory (p. 261). Geneva: Interscience
Publishers.
52. Hsia, P. S. (1952). A graphical analysis for nonlinear systems. Proceeding of IEEE, 99,
125.
53. Crisson, G. (1931). Negative impedances in the twin 21 type repeater. Bell System
Technical Journal, 10, 485.
54. Gautam, A. K., & Vishvakarma, B. R. (2006). Frequency agile microstrip antenna using
symmetrically loaded tunnel diodes. Indian Journal of Radio & Space physics, 35, 212–
216.
55. Srivastava, S., & Vishvakarma, B. R. (1999). Tunnel diode integrated rectangular patch
antenna. In Proceeding of the Radar Symposium India-99 (IRSI-99), Bangalore.
56. Srivastava, S., & Vishvakarma, B. R. (2003). Tunnel diode integrated rectangular
microstrip antenna for millimeter range. IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation
(USA), 51, 750.
57. Woo, C. F. (1964). Principles of tunnel diode circuits. New York: Wiley.
58. Sylvesten, G. P. (1962). Basic theory and applications of tunnel diode. Princeton, New
Jersey, USA: Van nostrand.
59. Soliman, F. A. S, & Kamh, S. A. (1993). Computer analysis for designing narrow band
tunnel diode amplifier circuit. Communication Faculty of Science University of Ankara
Series A2, A3, 42, 33–49.
60. Boric-Lubecke, O., Pan, D. S., & Itoh, T. (1995). Design and triggering of oscillators with a
series connection of tunneling diodes. Electronics and Engineering, 8(2), 271–286.
61. Brown, E. R., Soderstrom, J. R., Paker, C. D., Mahoney, L. J., Molvar, K. M., & McGill, T.
C. (1991). Oscillations up to 712 GHz in InAs/AISb resonant tunneling diodes. Applied
Physics Letters, 58(20), 20.
62. Menozzi, R., Piazzi, A., & Contini, F. (1996). Small-signal modeling for microwave FET
linear circuits based on a genetic algorithm. IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems—I:
Fundamental Theory and Applications, 43(10).
63. Jerinic, G., Fines, J., Cobb, M., & Schindler, M. (1985). Ka/Q band GaAs IMPATT
amplifier technology. International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 6(2), 79–
130.
64. Mishra, L. P., & Mitra, M. (2015). Design and characterization of Ka-Band reflection-type
IMPATT amplifier. Intelligent Computing, Communication and Devices Advanced
Intelligent Systems and Computing, 308, 487–492.
65. Al-Attar, T., & Lee, T. H. (2005). Monolithic integrated millimeter wave IMPATT
transmitter in standard CMOS technology. IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and
Techniques, 53(11).
66. Gupta, M. S., & Lomax, R. J. (1971). A self-consistent large-signal analysis of read-type
IMPATT diode oscillator. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, ED-18(8), 544–550.
1038 References

67. Gupta, M. S., & Lomax, R. J. (1971). Injection locking in IMPATT diode oscillators. In
Proceedings of the Third Biennial Cornell Electrical Engineering Conference (pp. 215–
223). Ithaca, New York: School of Electrical Engineering, Cornell University. Reprinted in:
Avalanche Transit-Time Devices, G.I. Haddad, editor, Artech House, Dedham, Mass. 1973,
pp. 457–460.
68. Gupta, M. S., & Lomax, R. J. (1973). A current-excited large-signal analysis of IMPATT
devices and its circuit implications. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, ED-20(4),
395–399.
69. Gupta, M. S. (1973). Computer-aided characterization of IMPATT diodes. In Proceedings
of the Fourth Biennial Cornell Electrical Engineering Conference (pp. 349–358). Ithaca,
New York: School of Electrical Engineering, Cornell University.
70. Gupta, M. S. (1973). A small-signal and noise equivalent circuit for IMPATT diodes. IEEE
Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, MTT-21(9), 591–594.
71. Gupta, M. S. (1973). Large-signal equivalent circuit for IMPATT diode characterization
and its application to amplifiers. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques,
MTT-21(11), 689–694.
72. Gupta, M. S. Lomax, R. J., & Haddad, G. I. (1974). Noise considerations in self-mixing
IMPATT-diode oscillators for short-range doppler radar applications. IEEE Transactions
on Microwave Theory and Techniques, MTT-22(1), 37–43.
73. Gupta, M. S. (1975). A simple approximate method of estimating the effect of carrier
diffusion in IMPATT diodes. Solid-State Electronics, 18(4), 327–330.
74. Gupta, M. S. (1976). A nonlinear equivalent circuit for IMPATT diodes. Solid-State
Electronics, 19(1), 23–26.
75. Atherton, D. P. (1981). Stability of nonlinear system (Electronic & Electrical engineering
research studies). New York: Wiley.
76. Xue, D., Chen, Y. Q., & Atherton, D. P. (2009). Linear feedback control: Analysis and
design with MATLAB (advanced in design and control). Society for industrial and applied
mathematics (1st ed.).
77. Atherton, D. P. (1982). Nonlinear control engineering. London: Chapman & Hall (stu sub
edition).
78. Bar-yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems (studies in nonlinearity) (1st ed.).
Boulder: Westview press.
79. Steeb, W. H. (2014). The nonlinear workbook: Chaos, fractals, cellular automata, generic
algorithms, gene expression programming, support vector machine, wavelets, hidden…
Java and symbolic C++ programs (6th ed.). Singapore: World scientific.
80. Sternberg, S. (2012). Curvature in mathematics and physics. New York: Dover
publications.
81. Sternberg, S. (2010). Dynamical systems. New York: Dover publications.
82. Scheinerman, E. R. (2012, January 18). Invitation to dynamical systems. New York: Dover
publications (Reprint edition).
83. Abraha, R. (1983). Dynamics the geometry of behavior part 2: Chaotic behavior (Visual
mathematics library). Aerial Press.
84. Abraham, R. (1982). Dynamics the geometry of behavior: Periodic behavior (Visual
mathematics library). Aerial Press.
85. Ahson, S., & Ilyas, M. (2008). RFID handbook, applications, technology, security, and
privacy. Boca Raton: CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group.
86. Aluf, O. (2014). Cylindrical RF network antennas for coupled plasma sources copper legs
delayed in time system stability. Transaction on networks and communications, 2(5),
116–146.
87. Cheban, D. N. (2015). Global attractors of non-autonomous dynamical and control systems
(2nd ed.). Singapore: World scientific.
88. Li, C., Wu, Y., & Ye, R. (2013). Recent advanced in applied nonlinear dynamics with
numerical analysis. Singapore: World scientific.
References 1039

89. Sidorov, D. (2014). Integral dynamical models. Singapore: World scientific.


90. Pozar, D. M. (2005). Microwave engineering (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
91. Collin, R. E. (1992). Foundation for microwave engineering (2nd ed.). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
92. Ludwig, R., & Bretchko, P. (2000). RF circuit design—Theory and applications. Upper
Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
93. Gonzalez, G. (1997). Microwave transistor amplifiers—Analysis and design (2nd ed.).
Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
94. Vendelin, G. D., Pavio, A. M., & Rhode, U. L. (1990). Microwave circuit design—using
linear and nonlinear techniques. New York: Wiley.
95. Gilmore, R., & Besser, L. (2003). Practical RF circuit design for modem wireless System
(Vols. 1–2). Norwood: Artech House.
96. Iu, H. H. C., & Fitch, A. L. (2013). Development of memristor based circuit. Singapore:
World Scientific.
97. Ling, B. W. K., & Iu, H. H. C. (2008). Control of chaos in nonlinear circuits and systems.
Singapore: World Scientific.
98. Abarbanel, H. D. I., Rabinovich, M. I., & Sushchik, M. M. (1993). Introduction to
nonlinear dynamics for physicists. Singapore: World Scientific.
99. Kilic, R. (2010). A practical guide for studying chua’s circuits. Singapore: World
Scientific.
100. Qiying, W. (2015). Limit theorems for nonlinear cointegrating regression. Singapore:
World Scientific.
101. Tatarinova, T., & Schumitzky, A. (2015). Nonlinear mixture models. Singapore: World
Sientific.
102. Blake, L. M., & Long, M. W. (2009). Antennas: Fundametals, design, measurement. USA:
SciTech publishing Inc.
103. Milligon, T. A. (2005). Modern antenna design. New York: Wiley.
104. Hansen, R. C., & Collin, R. E. (2011). Small antenna handbook. New York: Wiley.
105. Volakis, J. L., Chen, C. C., & Fujimoto, K. (2010). Small antennas: Miniaturization
techniques & applications. New York: Mc Graw Hill education.
106. Kumar, N., & Grebennikov, A. (2015). Distributed power amplifiers for RF and microwave
communications. Norwood: Artech House.
107. Campos, R. S., & Lovisolo, L. (2015). RF positioning: Fundamentals, applications, and
tools. Norwood: Artech House.
108. Wallace, R., & Andreasson, K. (2015). Introduction to RF and microwave passive
components. Norwood: Artech House.
109. Gildenblat, G. (2010). Compact modeling: Principles, techniques and applications. Berlin:
Springer.
110. Diks, C. (1999). Nonlinear time series analysis. Singapore: World Scientific.
111. Letellier, C., & Gilmore, R. (2013). Topology and dynamics of chaos. Singapore: World
Scientific.
112. Wang, Q. (2015). Limit theorems for nonlinear cointegrating regression. Singapore: World
Scientific.
113. Sibani, P., & Jensen, H. J. (2013). Stochastic dynamics of complex systems. Singapore:
World Scientific.
114. Sprott, J. C. (2010). Elegant chaos. Singapore: World Scientific.
115. Elhadj, Z., & Sprott, J. C. (2011a). Robust chaos and its applications. Singapore: World
Scientific.
116. Elhadj, Z., & Sprott, J. C. (2011b). Frontiers in the study of chaotic dynamical systems with
open problems. Singapore: World Scientific.
117. Hoover, W. G. & Hoover, C. G. (2015). Simulation and control of chaotic nonequilibrium
systems. Singapore: World Scientific.
1040 References

118. Ivancevic, V. G., & Reid, D. J. (2014). Complexity and control. Singapore: World
Scientific.
119. Nicolis, G., & Nicolis, C. (2012). Foundations of complex systems. Singapore: World
Scientific.
120. Cencini, M., Cecconi, F., & Vulpiani, A. (2009). Chaos. Singapore: World Scientific.
121. Salleh, A., Abd aziz, M. Z. A., Misran, M. H., Othman, M. A., & Mohamad, N. R. (2013).
Design of wideband low noise amplifier using negative feedback topology for Motorola
application (Vol. 5, No. 1). ISSN: 2180-1843.
122. Duan, L., Huang, W., Ma, C., He, X., Jin, Y., & Ye, T. (2012). A single to differential low
noise amplifier with low differential output imbalance. Journal of Semiconductors, 33(3),
035002.
123. Kuang, Y., & Cushing, J. M. (1996). Global stability in a nonlinear difference delay
equation model of flour beetle population growth. Journal of Difference Equations and
Applications, 2, 31–37.
124. Elsayed, E. M., El-Dessoky, M. M., & Alotaibi, A. (2012). On the solutions of a general
system of difference equations, Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Discrete Dynamics in
Nature and Society, 2012(892571), 12.
125. Desoer, C. A. (1969). Basic circuit theory (1st ed.). New York: Mcgraw-Hill College.
126. Grover, F. W. (2004). Inductance calculations: Working formulas and tables. New York:
Dover publications.
127. Greenhouse, H. M. (1974). Design of planar rectangular microelectronic inductors. IEEE
Transactions on Parts, Hybrids, and Packaging, PHP-10(2).
128. Rodriguez, E. G. (2015). Reconfigurable transceiver architecture for multiband RF
frontends. Berlin: Springer.
129. Steinberg, K., Scheffler, M., & Dressel, M. (2010). Microwave inductance of thin metal
strips. Journal of Applied Physics, 108, 096102.
130. Liao, Y., Cai, K., Hubing, T. H., & Wang, X. (2014). Equivalent circuit of normal mode
helical antennas using frequency—Independent lumped elements. IEEE Transactions on
Antennas and Propagation, 62, 5885–5888.
131. Su, C., Ke, H., & Hubing, T. H. (2010). A simplified model for normal mode helical
antennas. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, 25(1), 32–40.
132. Su, C., Ke, H., & Hubing, T. H. (2010). Corrections to a simplified model for normal mode
helical antennas. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, 25(8), 722.
Index

A 811, 818, 825, 836, 848, 870, 874, 884,


Abrupt junction, 747 907, 930, 942
Absolute value, 25, 51, 116, 229, 469, 683, Antenna inductance, 15, 46, 786, 820, 913, 923
705, 738, 762, 795, 826 Anti-collision protocol, 3, 4
Absorption method, 970 Antisymmetric, 923
Absorptive filter, 674 Apparent, 302, 619, 713, 714
AC-cycle, 528, 529 Arbitrary scalar differential equation, 2, 14
AC-ground, 574, 585, 603, 611, 619, 632, 645, Argument, 36, 56, 66, 97, 141, 167, 189, 264,
746 367, 455, 479, 800, 804, 813, 831, 834, 909
AC signal, 280, 644 Assumption, 4, 169, 220, 231, 240, 245, 332,
Active circulator, 155, 171–173, 177, 178, 180, 345, 354, 417, 430, 435, 471, 558, 642,
185, 191, 194, 336, 338, 339, 347, 352, 682, 767, 785, 959
370, 377 Asymptotic stability, 614
Active RFID system, 2, 9, 46 Atmospheric upheavals, 956
Active tag, 1, 6 Attenuation, 411, 493, 673, 675, 904, 947
Alfa, 281 Attenuator, 406, 489, 493, 494, 498, 500
AlGaAs, 304 Attracting circle, 13
Algebraic manipulation, 165, 169 Attracting stable, 872
ALOHA, 3, 4 Attraction, 617, 630
AM/FM, 904 Audio power amplifier, 514
Amper, 305, 784 Auto-bias, 300, 301
Amplifier, 174, 300, 302, 336, 348, 405, 410, Autonomous system, 12, 159
417, 433, 454, 513, 527, 559, 601, 904, Avalanche, 279, 333, 904, 1006–1008
910, 941, 944, 945, 947, 953, 954, 958, Avalanche multiplication, 1008
964, 1010, 1015 Avalanche region, 333
Amplifier gain, 302, 411 Average, 3, 6, 15, 23, 106, 461, 785, 818, 839,
Analytical criteria, 23, 46, 157, 786, 820 913, 914, 923, 1009
Analytical function, 35, 63, 93, 96, 137, 139, Average analysis, 6
161, 164, 183, 185, 186, 208, 259, 262, Average radius, 785
362, 366, 367, 455, 456, 480, 482, 697, Axial ratio, 876
711, 800, 811, 833, 834, 873, 909 Axial velocity, 875
Analytical methods, 1 Axis, 42, 144, 171, 195, 220, 365, 488, 630,
Analyze, 1, 2, 11, 31, 61, 73, 181, 196, 219, 812, 817, 873, 1020
360, 424, 488, 696, 802, 872, 1023, 1025
Angle, 38, 68, 99, 188, 210, 370, 457, 513, B
559, 813, 874, 908, 910, 953, 964, 981 Baker clamp, 994
Antenna, 1, 14, 23, 36, 44–46, 55, 72, 105, Balance parameter, 358–360
156, 196, 204, 213, 573, 783, 792, 800, Balun, 904

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 1041


O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6
1042 Index

Band attenuation, 673 70, 79, 85, 92, 96–98, 100, 114, 135–137,
Band Pass Filter (BPF), 674, 675, 683, 696, 139, 140, 141, 143, 148–153, 160, 161,
745, 752, 757, 761, 767, 911 163–165, 167, 171, 178, 181–183, 185,
Bandwidth, 3, 14, 338, 373, 573, 712, 785, 187, 188, 190, 195, 207–210, 212, 219,
903, 954, 957, 962 255–257, 259, 262, 263, 264, 266, 270,
Base current, 282, 584, 994, 996, 1002, 1003, 272, 273, 277, 356, 358, 360, 362, 365,
1007, 1008, 1018, 1019 366–370, 372, 389, 417, 430, 444, 454,
Base junction, 279, 280, 994, 1003, 1007, 457, 458, 459, 468, 478, 479, 483, 488,
1009, 1010 498, 536, 570, 572, 579, 614, 616, 624,
Base storage, 994 629, 638, 653, 683, 696, 704, 710, 711,
Base transport factor, 1003 736, 745, 761, 767, 797, 799, 800, 803,
Base width, 996, 1017, 1020, 1021, 1028 804, 806–808, 811–813, 816, 817, 820,
Battery, 1, 2, 44, 104 829, 830, 833–836, 870, 873, 881, 885,
Bias-T, 344, 355, 406, 471, 479, 484, 488 909, 910
BiCMOS, 1015 Charge carrier, 408, 489, 993, 994
Bi-cubic polynomial, 36, 164, 208 Charge control model, 1015, 1025, 1026, 1028
Bifurcation, 2, 14, 73, 101, 142, 164, 183, 208, Charge storage, 514, 1023, 1025, 1026
262, 372, 455, 480, 487, 811, 838, 905, 906 Charging capacitance, 1009
Binary Tree (BT), 3 Choke, 73, 156, 382, 493, 574, 631, 942, 943,
Bipolar transistor, 279–281, 299, 301, 910, 963
994, 995, 998, 1015, 1025, 1026, 1029 Circular coil, 784–786, 793–796
Birdcage coil, 196 Circular periodic, 12
Bit Error Rate (BER), 951 Circulator, 155, 171, 177, 178, 181, 191, 334,
BJT, 407, 408, 410, 423, 514, 517, 530, 559, 344, 355, 379, 910
574, 584–586, 619, 638, 645, 910, 993, Clap, 630, 910
1002, 1004, 1010, 1015, 1017, 1020, 1021 Class A, 514, 515, 574
Body effect parameter, 1012, 1013 Class AB, 514, 527
Boltzmann’s constant, 957 Class B, 513, 514, 559, 560
Bondwire, 71, 281, 854 Class C, 514, 528, 529, 536
Borderline, 22 Class D, 406
Branch, 173, 194, 305 Clipping, 952, 953, 1010
Breakdown, 156, 333, 747, 1006, 1008 Clockwise, 20
Breakdown voltage, 156, 747, 1007, 1008 Closed loop, 624, 629, 630
Bulk, 73, 515, 1012, 1013, 1015 CMOS, 103, 1015
Bulk-source, 1015 Coax cable, 461, 468
Burst switch, 104–106, 113, 116, 136, 142, 144 Co-dimension, 906
Bypass, 101, 222, 223, 225, 337, 618, 644 Coefficient, 36, 56, 59, 62, 66, 93, 98, 165,
Bypass capacitance, 101 208, 262, 362, 454, 456, 482, 612, 616,
804, 811, 830, 834, 1009
C Coil, 2, 8, 14, 24, 619, 620, 714, 784, 785, 793,
Capacitor, 2, 6, 155, 172, 197, 301, 335, 382, 795, 798, 808
460, 493, 574, 632, 697, 746, 842, 904, Collector current, 282, 528, 529, 993, 994, 996,
970, 980, 983, 1028, 1033 1007, 1015, 1022, 1027
Cascade, 711, 911 Collide, 905
CCNR, 336 Colpitts, 630, 910
Center, 19, 22, 422, 614, 617, 630, 643, 659, Common Base (CB), 405, 910, 941, 942, 1001
745, 853, 974 Common base forward short circuit current
Center manifold theorem, 617 gain, 282
Channel length modulation parameter, 1013 Common Collector (CC), 405, 910, 941, 944,
Chaos model, 1 945
Characteristic curve, 513 Common Emitter (CE), 405, 408, 910, 941,
Characteristic equation, 17, 23, 25, 28, 30–37, 943, 1001
39, 42, 45, 50, 53–57, 59, 60, 63–66, 68,
Index 1043

Complex, 19, 36, 67, 98, 103, 144, 167, 191, Decay oscillation spiral, 298
213, 262, 368, 456, 488, 527, 629, 696, Degenerate node, 22
710, 745, 797, 816, 834, 847, 884, 906, Delay, 2, 22, 24, 29, 33, 43, 45, 50, 55, 70,
909, 1021 101, 132, 157, 173, 196, 255, 360, 406,
Complex conjugate, 109, 366, 411, 615, 630, 461, 696, 793, 803, 817, 837, 906, 1026
696, 710, 745, 767, 872, 945 Delay dependent parameters, 2, 22, 46, 157,
Complex number, 19 696, 711, 819, 820, 872
Conductivity, 108, 785, 819, 839, 841, 918, Delay Differential Equation (DDE), 170
922, 1006 Delay parameter, 31, 57, 101, 142, 190, 229,
Conductor, 171, 279, 783, 784 372, 459, 479, 710, 838, 843, 907, 909
Conjugate, 833, 871, 884, 906, 959, 977 Depletion capacitance, 1009, 1010, 1015
Connectorize, 460 Derivative, 11, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25, 29, 38, 45,
Conservation, 619, 713, 714 68, 98, 115, 161, 165, 171, 180, 188, 204,
Continuous Wave (CW), 73 218, 230, 321, 348, 444, 483, 579, 653,
Converge, 18, 19, 21 794, 812, 819, 826, 835, 863, 907
Coordinates, 26, 52, 54, 82, 179, 180, 204, Detector, 1, 72, 74, 81, 94, 100–102, 489
252, 255, 324, 347, 349, 353, 794, 826, 828 Detector circuit, 101
Copper, 156, 196, 197, 202, 213, 335, 981 Determinant, 611, 613, 616, 726
Copper leg, 196, 213, 218, 910 Deterministic protocol, 3
Core, 619, 620, 713, 715 Deterministic TAG anti-collision, 4
Cos, 845 Device Under Test (DUT), 954
Cosmic noise, 957 Diagram, 14, 42, 102, 217, 574, 848
Counter, 20, 105, 410, 630 Diameter, 15, 23, 213, 784, 818, 873, 876, 914,
Counter clockwise, 20 925
Coupling coefficient, 46, 786, 820, 924 Dielectric constant, 980, 981
Cramer’s rule, 611, 726 Dielectric material, 222, 876
Critical threshold, 905 Differentiable, 29, 31, 35, 36, 43, 56, 59, 65,
Cross section, 73, 108, 785, 819, 841, 854, 97, 140, 186, 210, 365, 456, 482, 711, 804,
918, 919, 922, 931 817, 833, 872, 907
Crystal lattice, 674, 712 Differential equations, 2, 14, 16, 22, 45, 50, 77,
Current gain, 280, 405, 561, 943, 994, 1003, 113, 156, 177, 204, 285, 323, 443, 497,
1004, 1019, 1023, 1028 564, 607, 647, 679, 701, 721, 752, 760,
Current sink, 560, 1028 825, 879, 925
Current-voltage relation, 156, 994 Differential function, 456, 800
Curve, 336, 994, 1015, 1018, 1020, 1028 Diffusion, 156, 408, 993, 996, 1009
Curve bend, 981 Digital circuit, 72, 73, 513
Cutoff, 173, 339, 410, 1001 Diode, 72, 73, 101, 104, 155–157, 221, 230,
Cycle, 8, 19, 281, 515, 559, 953 334, 335, 347, 373, 410, 489, 490, 493,
Cylinder, 9 745, 749, 758, 765, 910, 995, 996, 1013,
Cylindrical RF network antennas, 156, 1014, 1026
202–204, 206, 210, 213, 217–219, 904 Diplexer, 673–675, 682, 689, 696, 704, 709,
711, 911
D Dipole antenna, 784, 873
dBm, 958, 964 Discrete system, 905
dB(s), 333, 410, 946, 964, 1009, 1017, 1018 Disjoint frequency band, 674
DC bias, 101, 156, 280, 335, 460, 574, 631, Displacement, 81, 203, 333
959, 1022 Dissipation balance, 8
DC resistance, 108, 785, 818, 819, 839, 841, Distortion, 408, 410, 513, 528, 559, 951–954,
918, 919, 922, 930, 931 1010
Decade bandwidth, 171, 172, 338 Distributed transformer, 979, 980
Decay, 10, 19, 617 Disturbance, 11, 528, 568
Decay exponentially, 19, 617 Disturbance grow, 10
Decaying oscillations, 19 Dopant, 1018, 1021, 1022
1044 Index

Double loop antennas, 44, 45, 48, 72 Etched, 8, 16, 904, 915
Drain, 172, 299, 301, 382, 574, 956, 1013, Euler’s formula, 162
1015, 1020 Excitable bifurcation system, 2
Drift region, 333, 334 Excitation, 45, 489
Dual band, 697, 704, 707, 710, 711 Exponential form, 25, 26, 28, 51, 81, 115, 161,
Duplexer, 674, 675 178, 204, 229, 252, 324, 347, 389, 430,
Dynamical behavior, 170, 905 468, 536, 624, 653, 704, 761, 794, 826,
Dynamic range, 408, 490, 712 869, 880
Exponential motion, 17
E External disturbance, 617
Ebers-Moll, 410, 514, 529, 995, 1003–1005,
1015, 1028 F
EFF, 945, 981 F20-FET-4  75, 171, 338, 190
Efficiency, 14, 333, 373, 513, 515, 529, 559, Faraday’s law, 620, 715
712, 945, 994, 1019 Far field, 783
Eigendirection, 19 Fast switch, 406, 489
Eigen solution, 17, 19 Feedback, 172, 280, 338, 382, 411, 573, 574,
Eigenvalue, 17–20, 56, 93, 164, 183, 229, 298, 579, 601, 602, 618, 630, 644, 944, 959, 962
347, 390, 422, 456, 498, 570, 579, 614, Feedback branch, 172, 338
617, 630, 659, 696, 710, 736, 745, 767, Feedback network, 602, 644
795, 797, 804, 826, 869, 871, 885, 906 Feedback resistor, 959
Eigenvector, 17, 18, 20 Feedback system, 617, 910
Electromagnetic, 1, 2, 42, 50, 222, 785, 818, Femtofarad, 305
911 Ferromagnetic material, 620, 715
Electromagnetic energy, 783 Fick’s law, 996
Electromagnetic interferences, 22, 24, 43–45, Field Effect Transistor (FET), 904
50, 72, 793 Film, 784, 849, 854, 855, 869, 872, 911,
Electron, 3, 279, 280, 299, 300, 333 1025
Electron injection, 1015, 1027 Filter, 105, 406, 529, 674, 675, 704, 709, 711,
Electrostatic, 1 712, 717, 733, 736, 738, 746, 911, 954
Emitter, 279, 280, 405, 408, 515, 528, 574, Five elements circuit, 874
584, 601, 631, 941, 944, 955, 993–995, Fixed point, 2, 10, 11, 13, 18–22, 25, 50, 51,
1001–1004, 1006–1008 81, 83, 115, 116, 161, 178, 179, 203, 229,
Emitter doping, 1002, 1019 286, 294, 309, 324, 329, 347, 354,
Empirical parameter, 221 429–431, 443, 467, 469, 498, 499, 525,
Encoder, 73 527, 535, 568, 579, 581, 611, 612, 624,
End of frame, 5 627, 636
Energy, 2–4, 6, 8, 19, 104, 113, 222, 223, 617, Flat topping, 952
619, 714, 911 Flux, 619, 620, 713, 714, 981
Energy consumption, 2–4, 6 Focus, 36, 70, 139, 164, 368, 488, 838, 994
Energy generation, 8 Forcing function, 9
Environment, 42, 72 Forcing signal, 169
EPC, 904 Forward active mode, 410, 995, 1002–1004,
Epitaxial layer, 299, 300 1010
Equilibrium, 25, 50, 70, 81, 115, 161, 178, Forward common emitter current gain, 282
203, 229, 291, 347, 388, 429, 444, 498, Free space, 783, 784, 874, 875
536, 614, 617, 624, 682, 735, 761, 816, Frequency, 1, 44, 104, 172, 221, 223, 280, 281,
828, 880, 993 301, 303, 305, 334, 335, 373, 405, 410,
Equivalent circuit, 2, 6, 7, 14, 15, 23, 73, 102, 490, 492, 528, 529, 601, 630, 631, 673,
164, 171, 299, 305, 383, 417, 461, 492, 674, 697, 745, 748, 874, 877, 904, 910,
498, 560, 579, 611, 712, 786, 852, 853, 941, 944, 950, 951, 954, 959, 962, 963,
874, 910, 1022 970, 974, 1021, 1024
Estimation, 8, 24, 915, 925 Frequency Division Duplex (FDD), 674
Index 1045

FSK encoder, 73 Heavily doped emitter, 993, 1015, 1020


F slots reader, 6 Heavy audio distortion, 528
Fully-OFF, 513 Helical, 784, 873–876, 911
Fully-ON, 513 Helix, 784, 873, 874, 876, 880, 883, 884,
911
G HEMT, 304
GaAlAs, 1020 Heterojunction Bipolar Transistor (HBT), 1020
GaAs, 299–301, 304, 1020 Hfe, 962
Gain, 280, 299, 301, 335, 405, 408, 410, 561, Higher harmonic, 410
573, 601, 783, 903, 904, 941, 948, High fidelity, 513
956–958, 962–964, 994, 1003, 1008, 1015, High frequency circuit, 747
1019–1021, 1024, 1028 High frequency model, 172, 173, 303, 305,
GAMMA, 903, 1013 338, 747
Gamma radiation, 903 High level injection, 406, 489, 514, 559, 1015,
Gap, 1, 15, 23, 106, 304, 818, 839, 913–915, 1018, 1020, 1026, 1027, 1029
923, 925, 927, 983, 1017, 1019 High-pass, 196, 461, 673, 674, 952
Gate, 44–46, 50–52, 55–57, 59, 61, 65–69, 71, High speed counter circuit, 221
98, 139, 172, 187, 299, 301, 338, 382, 1015 Hodges, 1010
Gate termination, 173, 338 Hole’s level, 489
GEC-Marconi, 171, 338 Hole current, 1002, 1003, 1019, 1027
Geometric criterion, 23, 46, 157, 360, 367, Hole mobility, 490, 1015
696, 711, 820, 872, 907 Homogeneous, 25, 35, 51, 56, 59, 62, 65, 81,
Geometric Mean Distance (GMD), 852, 856 93, 115, 135, 136, 178, 183, 185, 203, 208,
Geometric stability, 143, 170, 696, 710, 872, 229, 259, 324, 347, 362, 389, 454, 683,
911 704, 736, 761, 794, 800, 804, 826, 830,
GHz, 223, 279, 333–335, 573, 783, 903, 944, 869, 880
960, 982, 983 Homogeneous system, 35, 51, 56, 59, 62, 65,
Giacoletto, 409 93, 115, 135, 136, 178, 183, 185, 203, 208,
Global bifurcation, 905 229, 259, 324, 347, 362, 389, 454, 683,
GMAX, 961 704, 736, 761, 794, 800, 804, 826, 830,
Graph, 2, 22, 46, 157, 336, 527, 673, 696, 711, 869, 880
786, 820, 872, 906, 1011, 1016 Homomorphism, 9
Graphical information, 2, 22, 46, 157, 696, Hot spot, 1008
711, 819, 872 H-port, 674
Ground pad, 157 Hybrid, 155, 171, 408, 586, 619, 632, 645
Ground plane, 784, 873, 980, 981 Hybrid Pi model, 408, 586, 619, 632, 645
Ground terminal, 301 Hybrid realization, 171
Growing oscillator, 19, 72, 222, 298 Hyperabrupt junction, 747
Gummel number, 1018, 1019, 1027 Hyperbolic fixed point, 128
Gummel plot, 1018, 1020, 1027
Gummel-Poon model, 514, 559–561, 910, I
1026, 1028, 1029 Ideality factor, 221
Identity matrix, 17, 570
H I-layer, 156, 492
Half-duplex operation, 4 Imaginary axis, 36, 43, 67, 70, 98, 101, 139,
Half lattice, 711, 911 142, 160, 163, 165, 187, 190, 195, 209,
Harmonic distortion, 408, 951, 956 219, 263, 267, 365, 368, 372, 456, 459,
Harmonic oscillator, 601 482, 614, 643, 659, 817, 834, 838
Hartley oscillator, 631, 634, 638, 641, 644 Imaginary value, 41, 71, 102, 103, 191, 213,
Heat, 73, 333, 335, 981 372, 842, 843, 847
Heating, 513, 1008 Impact, 333, 1021
Heat sink, 333, 335 Impact ionization, 333, 904
1046 Index

IMPATT, 279, 333–336, 338, 339, 344, 347, K


348, 355, 366, 373, 374, 377, 379, 380, 910 Ka-band, 334
Impedance, 73, 101, 105, 302, 303, 335, 336, KCL, 384, 413, 425, 436, 495, 604, 621–623,
405, 406, 410, 411, 422, 513, 573, 574, 633, 634, 646–648, 699, 716, 722, 724,
673, 712, 853, 873, 904, 941–948, 950, 749, 752, 1007
958–960, 962, 963, 970, 972, 973, Kelvin, 282
975–978, 980, 981, 1023 K-formula, 960
Independent variable, 9 Kirchhoff, 305
Index, 467, 785, 818, 849 Kirchoff’s laws, 996
Inductance, 2, 8, 14–16, 18, 22, 23, 48, 73, 78, Kirk effect, 561, 1022, 1024, 1028
101, 105, 109, 196, 281, 302, 303, 630, K-parameter, 17
747, 784, 840, 841, 849, 851, 854, 857,
873, 914, 915, 918, 919, 923, 925, 931, L
940, 970, 977, 978 Label, 6, 14, 15, 22, 23, 31, 33, 39, 43
Inductance element, 46, 786, 820, 905 Ladder, 602, 711
Inductive Coupled Plasma (ICP), 196 Large signal amplifier, 406
Inferior rectifier, 489 Large signal transient model, 1013, 1014
Infinite, 161, 167, 784, 961, 1008 Lateral diffusion parameter, 1012, 1013
InGaAs, 1020 Lattice, 711, 715, 717, 721, 723, 734, 736–738,
Initial condition, 13, 18, 527, 617 743, 745, 911, 1020
Injection locked mode, 373 LC circuit, 222, 223, 631, 673
Inject RF signal, 172, 338 LC matching network, 574
InP, 299, 302, 1020 LC matching topology, 947
In-phase, 631 Leakage current, 747, 1003, 1005, 1007, 1008,
Intercept, 408, 954, 955, 1018, 1020 1020
Interference, 22, 24, 42, 43, 50, 72, 194, Leaky switch, 1006
784, 785, 793, 818, 819, 825, 906, 952, Leg, 156, 196, 197, 202, 205, 213, 218, 219,
954, 956 746
Interfering signal, 957 LF–tag, 913, 923
Inter Modulation Distortion (IMD), 675, 951, Light, 280, 333, 875, 903, 982, 994
954, 955 Limit, 2, 8, 9, 16, 24, 36, 66, 97, 138, 164, 186,
Internal resistance, 6, 14, 944 208, 262, 335, 367, 410, 456, 482, 491,
Interrogation signal, 3 514, 574, 811, 834, 854, 915, 925, 956,
Interrogator, 73 987, 988, 990, 991, 994, 1003, 1008, 1010,
Intrinsic material, 334, 406, 489, 1017 1021, 1028
Intrinsic output resistance, 1023 Limit cycle, 2, 9
Invariant, 9, 617, 905 Limiter circuit, 155, 156, 161, 171
Ionization, 333, 1021 Limit relation, 38, 68, 99, 140, 188, 210, 264,
Ionosphere, 904 370, 457, 483, 614, 836, 908
Isolation, 382, 460, 493, 573, 995, 1025, 1028 Linear-algebra, 18
Linear combination, 18, 20
J Linear hybrid Pi-model, 408, 411, 423, 424,
Jacobian, 28, 54, 85, 134, 181, 205, 255, 291, 435, 575, 611
294, 355, 452, 453, 459, 475, 477, 798, 829 Linear neutral equation, 160
Jacobian matrix, 11, 569, 614, 629, 696, 710, Lipunov, 333, 422, 434, 501, 558, 584
745, 767, 797, 884, 906 L–Matching network, 406, 411, 422, 440, 444,
JFET, 171, 299, 338, 942, 943 452–454, 456–458, 574, 947
JFET common gate amplifier, 942 LNA, 514, 573, 574, 578, 579, 910, 941
Junction, 73, 101, 156, 172, 173, 279, 281, L–Network, 411, 422, 444, 947, 948, 967, 969,
299, 300, 304, 335, 338, 490, 492, 529, 970, 974
746, 747, 952, 956, 993–995, 1002, 1004, Local bifurcation, 2, 14, 73, 905
1005, 1007–1009, 1014, 1015, 1020, 1021, Local stability, 2, 22, 25, 46, 51, 81, 157, 161,
1023, 1025, 1029 178, 203, 229, 324, 347, 388, 417, 430,
Index 1047

444, 468, 498, 536, 579, 624, 638, 652, Mixture, 841, 918, 919, 922
682, 696, 704, 711, 736, 761, 794, 820, Mobile, 818, 873, 904
826, 869, 872, 880, 905 MOD-FET, 299
Lower cut-off frequency, 461 Modulate, 73, 491, 951
Lower sideband ladde, 711 Monolithic, 155, 338, 910
Low pass response, 411, 673, 674, 947, 948 Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit
L–Shape, 411, 947 (MMIC), 155, 171, 338, 411, 904
MOSFET, 299, 304, 993, 1010–1015, 1020,
M 1025, 1028
Maclaurin series, 58, 61, 65, 135, 182, 185, Multilayer, 785, 786, 793–797, 800, 804, 811,
257, 366, 803, 807, 830, 833 812, 814, 816, 911
Magnetic circuit, 620, 715 Multiplication, 20, 243, 250, 953, 1007, 1008
Magnetic material, 620, 715 Multiplication coefficient, 1007
Majority carrier, 993, 1009, 1017 Multiplication factor, 1008
Manifold, 9, 167, 614, 617, 630, 643, 659, 904 Multi Slotted (MS) scheme, 3
Maps, 31, 33, 35, 38, 68, 99, 140, 188, 206, Multi Slotted with Assigned Slots (MAS), 3
208, 210, 264, 370, 457, 483, 813, 836, Multi Slotted with Selective sleep (MSS), 3
905, 908 Multistage, 373, 374, 573
Matching network, 73, 104, 105, 406, 411, Mutual inductance, 46, 786, 793, 820, 849,
417, 420–422, 430, 433, 435, 574, 575, 850, 852, 855–857, 874, 907, 923
675, 676, 697, 903, 904, 910, 947, 948, Mutual interaction, 169
950, 958, 959, 965, 970, 972 Mutually perpendicular, 19
Material composition, 1027
MATLAB, 22, 42, 46, 103, 157, 191, 213–215, N
217, 786, 820, 843, 845, 915, 925 N+ doped substrate, 156
Matrix, 11, 17, 77, 177, 346, 420, 452, 453, Narrow band, 422, 959, 973
499, 569, 570, 572, 613, 614, 617 N-Doped, 279, 299, 746, 993
Matrix formulation, 17 Negative Differential Resistance (NDR), 156,
Matrix system, 17 336, 1006
Maximum Available Gain (MAG), 961, 964 Negative resistance, 156, 221–224, 333–337,
Maximum oscillation frequency, 1025 355, 373, 380, 601, 618
Maximum Stable Gain (MSG), 964 Neural differential equation, 161
MESFETs, 171, 338 Noise current, 174, 957, 958
Metal structure, 222 Noise Factor (NF), 302
Meter, 784, 919, 922, 931, 940 Noise Figure (NF), 573, 958
Mho, 305 Noise voltage, 174, 957, 958
Microelectronic, 857 Noisy period, 105
Microphone, 957 Non-autonomous, 9
Microstrip, 155–157, 169, 171, 279, 335, 344, Nonlinear behavior, 410, 1003
374, 382, 383, 435, 461, 471, 786, 820, Nonlinear distortion, 952
849, 853, 857, 877, 907, 910, 911, 980–982 Nonlinear dynamic, 1, 299, 618
Microwave amplifier, 221, 222, 279 Nonlinearity, 675, 954, 956
Microwave bipolar transistor, 280 Nonlinear system, 15
Microwave cavity, 222, 223 Non-negative parameter, 12, 159
Microwave Integrated Circuit (MIC), 155, 910 Non-uniform, 1018, 1027
Microwave oscillator, 156, 221–223, 228, 333, Normally ON, 299
601, 910 Normal Mode Helical Antenna (NMHA), 873,
Millimeter, 280, 299, 302, 304, 783 876
Minor, 300, 471 NPN, 515, 517, 530, 559, 586, 618, 619, 632,
Mismatched line, 950 644, 645, 993–995, 1001, 1002, 1007, 1015
Mismatch load, 950 N–Region, 333, 334, 337, 489, 490, 746
Mismatch Loss (ML), 946, 964, 981 N-Turn multilayer, 784–786, 792–795, 797,
Miter bend, 981 800, 802, 806, 811–813, 816
1048 Index

Number index, 202, 218 263, 267, 370, 372, 457, 459, 482, 488,
Numerator, 242, 541, 611, 975 568, 715, 813, 816, 836, 908, 910
Numerically, 36, 66, 71, 97, 115, 138, 164, Passive, 1–3, 12, 44–46, 105, 155, 406, 674,
186, 187, 194, 208, 212, 262, 291, 367, 676, 911, 948, 951
456, 479, 482, 524, 614, 696, 745, 797, Passive tag, 1, 2
811, 834, 847, 884, 906 PCB, 950, 962, 981, 982
PCB stray, 854
O PDEs, 905
ODEs, 905 P-Doped, 279, 993
Ohmic region, 221 Perfect Electric Conductor (PEC), 873
Ointment, 839, 913, 914, 923 Perfect match, 109, 959, 965, 966, 984
One frame, 5 Periodic, 12, 13, 20, 159, 601
Open circuit stable, 336 Periodic forcing, 9
Operational frequency, 335, 1009 Periodic function, 9
Operator, 165, 169 Periodic orbit, 9, 905
Optical spectrum, 903 Periodic solution, 9
Optimal bandwidth, 373 Periodic transformation, 13, 159
Optimization, 2, 14, 22, 44, 73, 299, 305, 784, Permeability, 223, 784, 839, 849, 874, 913,
785, 818, 849, 910, 911 923
Orbit, 2, 9, 12, 14, 19, 73, 617, 630, 905 Permittivity, 223
Orientation, 12, 44 Perturbation, 12, 614, 616
Origin, 18–20, 613 Phase plan, 12, 18
Oscilloscope, 221 Phase portrait, 19, 527, 568
Overlapping, 1013, 1014 Phase response, 408
Oxide thickness, 1015 Phase shift, 171, 410, 602, 611, 617, 618, 910,
Oxide trench, 1028 944, 977
Phase shift network, 602, 603
P Phase shift resonator, 617
P+ top, 156 PHEMT SSM, 305
Pad reactance, 950 Photo detector, 406
Parameter, 2, 12–14, 16, 20, 25, 31, 37, 42, 46, Physical proximity, 620, 715
47, 55, 57, 60, 64, 66, 68, 69, 71–73, 81, Pi–matching network, 406, 422, 947, 949
92, 96, 98, 99, 101, 103, 116, 131, 133, PIN diode, 155, 406, 489, 492, 494, 498, 500,
137, 139, 141, 143, 163, 168, 171, 176, 904
181, 184, 187, 191, 194, 195, 206, 217, Pitch, 873, 874
219, 256, 264, 300, 319, 366, 370, 373, Planar PCB, 46, 820, 923
454, 457, 459, 475, 479, 481, 483, 488, Plasma, 155, 196, 910
574, 659, 683, 705, 733, 738, 785, 795, P-N junction, 156, 172, 221, 338, 910, 994,
809, 811, 812, 814, 818, 832–834, 852 995
Parameter function, 2, 14, 15, 22, 23, 36, 38, PNP, 515, 517, 586, 993, 994, 998, 999, 1001,
39, 46, 51, 70, 73, 86, 96, 138, 163, 169, 1007, 1009, 1015
188, 194, 203, 211, 219, 229, 261, 267, Polar coordinates, 13
302, 348, 454, 459, 478, 517, 784, 804, PolyEthylene Terephthalate (PET), 904
819, 834, 873, 908, 978, 1015, 1028 Polynomial, 25, 51, 57, 60, 66, 81, 94, 96, 97,
Parasitic delay, 73, 77, 194, 197, 218, 435, 115, 137, 138, 161, 167, 178, 183, 186,
784 203, 229, 263, 324, 347, 362, 364, 368,
Parasitic effect, 104, 105, 113, 155, 156, 171, 389, 417, 430, 444, 455, 468, 480, 482,
181, 194, 202, 218, 279, 406, 435, 471, 498, 536, 579, 616, 624, 638, 683, 704,
676, 697, 785, 786, 818, 853, 877, 907, 736, 794, 801, 810, 826, 834, 880
911, 950 Poly-Si base, 1028
Parasitic inductance, 73, 101, 490 Positive feedback, 405, 601–603, 618, 944
Partial derivative, 36, 38, 67, 68, 70, 99, 139, Positive root, 36, 37, 68, 94, 97, 99, 136, 139,
142, 144, 164, 169, 187, 188, 190, 210, 140, 164, 167, 183, 187, 188, 209, 260,
Index 1049

263, 264, 362, 368, 369, 455, 457, 483, Receiver, 72, 73, 101, 105, 155, 156, 173, 174,
813, 908 494, 573, 673, 674, 712, 783, 903, 904,
Power circuit, 105, 559, 1020 942, 943, 951, 954, 956, 958
Power gain, 405, 410, 574, 903, 944, 964 Recombination, 490, 491, 994, 1003, 1017,
Power limiter, 155, 156, 158–161, 163, 164, 1025
169, 171 Rectangular spiral antenna, 104, 105, 109, 784,
Pre-collection mode, 333 818–820, 824–827, 829, 833, 834,
Printed, 8, 16, 72, 904, 915, 925 836–838, 843, 911, 914, 923, 924
Printed coil, 8, 16 Rectifier, 489
Projection, 9, 167 Reference direction, 620, 714
Propagation, 980, 981 Reflection, 109, 155, 171, 334–336, 339, 377,
PRrx, 6 406, 411, 903, 910, 941, 945, 947, 965, 981
PRtx, 6 Reflection Type Phase Shifter (RTPS), 171,
PTrx, 6 194
PTtx, 6 Re/Im, 615, 630, 696, 710, 745, 767, 797, 884,
Pulse based half duplex, 4 906
Pulse Width Modulation (PWM), 513 Relative permeability, 213
Pure imaginary, 20, 43, 44, 195, 219, 299, 365, Relaxation oscillator, 601
817 Resistance noise, 957
Purely resistive, 461, 973, 976 Resistive component, 461
Push pull amplifier, 514, 527 Resistivity, 489, 490, 854
Resistor, 2, 6, 14, 18, 46, 155, 169, 172, 174,
Q 221, 301, 338, 382, 383, 489, 491, 493,
Q–Point, 411 494, 515, 528, 574, 602, 603, 618, 631,
QT protocol, 4 644, 676, 697, 745, 786, 811, 820, 877,
Quadratic solution, 18 904, 923, 959, 963, 964, 974, 1023
Quadratic term, 11, 568, 569 Resonance frequency, 14, 631, 874
Quarter wavelength long, 335 Resonant, 155, 196, 222, 223, 333, 334, 528,
Quarter wave line transformer, 979 529, 603, 631, 673, 674, 711, 712, 874,
Quartz crystal, 631, 673, 674, 712 903, 948, 970
Query, 3 Response mechanism, 4
Query Tree (QT), 4 Resultant output signal, 951
Reverse active mode, 995, 1005
R Reverse bias, 279, 280, 301, 333, 493, 494,
Radar, 73, 333–335, 674, 904 746, 747, 995, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1010,
Radial wave number, 875 1013, 1015, 1017, 1026
Radio frequency identification, 1 Reverse biased varactor, 674
Radius, 108, 784, 785, 819, 839, 873, 918, Reverse biasing, 280, 489, 493, 1008
919, 922, 930, 931 Reverse common emitter current gain, 282
Random Access Memory (RAM), 1 Reverse mode, 995
Randomly, 3, 956 Reverse saturation, 996, 1013
Reactance, 101, 280, 337, 339, 461, 490, 631, Reversing, 12
746, 874, 959, 970, 972, 974, 978, 980 RFC, 631, 942, 943, 963
Reader energy consumption, 6 RFID, 1–4, 6, 8, 9, 11–28, 31, 33, 35–38, 40,
Reader query, 4, 5 42, 44, 46, 48, 51, 52, 55, 57, 61, 65, 67,
Reader transmits energy, 4 68, 70–73, 78, 81, 85, 97, 98, 100, 101,
Real number, 30, 32, 34, 56, 59, 63, 94, 137, 104, 105, 108, 109, 113, 115, 117,
183, 206, 207, 213, 260, 298, 363, 455, 134–136, 138–140, 143, 144, 783–786,
480, 696, 710, 801, 804, 808, 831, 843, 792, 794–797, 812, 818–820, 824–827,
871, 872, 904 829, 833, 836–839, 841–843, 845, 848,
Receive mode, 4 873, 876, 904, 905, 911
1050 Index

RFin signal, 77, 177, 286, 290, 293, 301 Sleep commands, 3, 6
Room temperature, 282, 492, 996, 1023 Small displacement, 25, 51, 116, 162, 178,
Root, 30, 32, 34, 36, 37, 40, 42–44, 56, 59, 60, 324, 348, 795, 826
63, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 94, 96–99, 101, 103, Small disturbance, 10, 527, 568
136–138, 142, 144, 160–165, 171, 183, Small increment, 25, 26, 51, 52, 54, 82, 115,
184, 186, 187, 190, 191, 195, 206, 208, 117, 128, 161, 178–180, 203, 204, 229,
209, 212, 218, 260, 262, 263, 267, 362, 230, 254, 255, 324, 330, 347–349, 352,
365, 367–369, 372, 373, 455–457, 459, 353, 355, 389, 417, 420, 430, 432, 433,
480–483, 488, 490, 614, 629, 696, 697, 444, 459, 468, 476, 498, 536, 579, 624,
710, 745, 767, 797, 801, 804, 805, 808, 627–629, 638, 641, 642, 652, 653, 657,
810–812, 816, 817, 831, 832, 834, 838, 682, 683, 686, 704, 707, 736, 743, 745,
848, 872, 884, 906, 907, 957, 961 761, 765, 767, 794, 798, 826–828, 869,
Rotation, 20, 155, 171 870, 880, 883
Round strip, 197 Small signal amplifier, 407, 411
Routh-Hurwitz, 333, 422, 434, 501, 558, 584, 616 Small Signal Model (SSM), 338
Solar flare, 957
S Source, 980, 983, 1012, 1015, 1019
S/m, 785, 841, 919 Source contact resistance, 1013
S2P, 960 Space charge layer, 334
Saddle point, 298, 572 S–Parameters, 960, 965
Saturation current, 221, 1003 Spectrum, 222, 673, 957
Scalar, 161, 964 Speed, 51, 81, 179, 348, 499, 903, 1015, 1021,
Schottky diode, 73, 102 1024
Schottky junction, 338 Spice Gummel Poon (SGP) model, 559
Segment, 43, 72, 195, 219, 222, 855, 873, 876 Spiral, 14, 19, 22, 298, 818–820, 825–828,
Selective sleep scheme, 3 830, 833, 834, 839, 842, 844, 845, 848
Self-bias method, 300 Spiral antenna, 818, 819, 825, 827, 834, 916,
Semi-passive RFID, 44–46 923
Separation distance, 45 Spiral converge, 18
Sequential (SEQ) operational, 4 S–Port, 674
Shichman, 1010 Spurious, 493, 954
Shifted gate, 44, 45, 50–52, 54, 57, 65 Spurs, 962
Short analysis, 194, 218 Squaring, 167, 188, 264, 457
Shunt, 101, 156, 157, 574, 963, 977, 978 SSB, 674
Shunt PCB, 854 Stability, 2, 21–23, 28, 35, 38–40, 42, 44, 55,
Siemens, 840, 919, 931 70–73, 86, 99, 101, 102, 104, 115, 140,
SiGe, 1015, 1017, 1020 143, 144, 155, 157, 160, 163, 167, 170,
Sign, 812, 816, 835, 838, 907, 910 181, 190–192, 194, 205, 208, 212, 217,
Signal, 461, 489, 491, 493, 513, 515, 529, 559, 219, 223, 256, 259, 267, 279, 298, 319,
574, 602, 631, 674, 904, 941, 944, 951, 333, 356, 358, 360, 366, 372, 373, 383,
952, 958, 981, 1003, 1010, 1019, 1024 392, 406, 411, 422, 434, 435, 453, 457,
Signal feeding, 197 459, 476, 478, 487, 488, 493, 501, 514,
Signal source, 334, 1023 558, 573, 574, 584, 601, 603, 614, 619,
Silicon, 73, 299, 489, 490, 1020 632, 643, 645, 659, 660, 686, 696, 697,
Silver, 839, 841, 913, 918, 919, 931 710, 745, 784, 786, 799, 813, 816, 818,
Simulation, 820, 1013, 1018, 1026, 1029 820, 829, 838, 848, 857, 872, 903,
Simulation model, 514, 1026 905–907, 910, 911
Sin, 167 Stability analysis, 28, 35, 43, 55, 65, 72, 155,
Sine wave, 528, 956 181, 195, 205, 219, 256, 333, 405, 411,
Single Pole Single Throw (SPST, 493 435, 454, 459, 489, 559, 601, 611, 630,
Siphon, 1009 644, 673, 674, 696, 697, 711, 783, 799,
SI unit, 840, 841, 918, 922 829, 872, 906, 910
Skin depth, 490 Stability switch, 22, 42, 44, 46, 68, 71, 102,
Skin effect, 490 103, 157, 188, 191, 194, 195, 210, 212,
Index 1051

217, 220, 264, 360, 370, 372, 373, 483, Track, 818, 840, 913, 915, 918, 922, 940
488, 816, 817, 820, 848, 908 Track thickness, 8, 915, 925
Stable focus, 812, 910 Trajectory, 19, 527
Stable node, 19, 298, 572 Trans conductance, 1015
Stable spiral, 298, 573 Transducer unilateral gain (Gth), 964
Stable steady state, 630, 710, 797, 884 Transformation, 712, 722, 975
Standing Wave Ratio (SWR), 950 Transformer, 174, 515, 528, 712, 904, 977
Star, 422, 957 Transformer’s coil, 620, 714
Star node, 20, 22 Transistor, 629–631, 644, 910, 952, 953, 956,
Start of frame, 5 959, 994, 995, 1002, 1003, 1006, 1008,
Static avalanche region, 1007 1012, 1018, 1026, 1029
Stored energy, 461 Transition, 163, 190, 459, 909
Straight, 17, 849, 851, 854, 855, 857, 862, 869, Transit-time, 333
871, 872, 963, 1018 Transmission line, 155, 281, 339, 574, 950,
Straight line solution, 17 958, 980, 981
Stray capacitance, 972, 973 Trigger circuit, 221
Strip, 854 Trivial solution, 160
S-Type, 336 Tunable, 674, 746, 761
Subscript, 68, 165, 210, 457, 836, 1017 Tunable BPF, 745, 748, 761
Subspace, 617 Tunnel Diode (TD), 221–223, 228, 910
Substantial current, 1006 Tunneling, 221, 223
Suck, 1002 Turn, 489, 491, 619, 713, 847, 849, 857, 870,
Sunspot, 957 872, 876, 1008
Surface inversion potential, 1012 Turn ratio, 174
Surface mount, 460
Symmetric, 172, 923 U
UH, 915
T UHF television tuner, 221
TAG ID, 2–4, 6 Unforced oscillator, 9
Taylor expansion, 207, 212 Unforced system, 13
Taylor series expansion, 58, 61, 65, 182, 185, Uniformly asymptotically stable, 160
366, 807 Uniformly bounded, 160, 161
Terahertz, 903 Unperturbed system, 12
Terminology, 35, 65, 96, 138, 164, 185, 262, Unstable, 161, 179, 190, 203, 222, 229, 325,
338, 422, 481, 674, 975 411, 459, 498, 614, 616, 696, 710, 795,
Tetrode, 221 826, 906
Thermal voltage, 282, 561 Unstable multi-vibrator, 601
Thickness, 106, 156, 300, 490, 849, 854, 981, Unstable node, 19
1021 Unstable spiral, 22
Thin plate, 48, 825 Unstable steady state, 630, 696, 745, 906
Third Order Intercept Point (TOI), 408 Upper cut-off frequency, 461
Third time interval, 169 UV, 903
Three dimensional autonomous systems, 9
Three elements circuit, 874 V
Threshold, 46, 156, 820, 1012 Valley, 224, 950
Time delay, 29, 38, 43, 46, 72, 157, 194, 195, Valley voltage, 950
219, 222, 360, 410, 488, 825, 907 Van der Pol’s system, 8
Time slot, 4 Varactor, 173, 338, 746, 761, 911
T–Matching network, 383, 406, 411, 422, 676, Variable, 177, 194, 218, 282, 344, 389, 430,
948 444, 489, 498, 536, 579, 624, 653, 745,
T–Network, 976 840, 919
Topologically, 9 Variable parameters, 45, 73
Trace, 46, 923, 950 Variation argument, 208, 367, 804, 811
1052 Index

Varicap, 746 Wide, 1, 489, 903, 904, 956


Varying amplitude, 13 Wideband LNA, 573, 574
Vast majority, 1002 Wideband signal, 410
Vector Network Analyzer (VNA), 460 Wide intrinsic region, 489
Velocity, 280, 980, 981 Widening, 1022, 1024, 1028
Vertical Bipolar Intercompany model (VBIC), WiMAX, 818
559 Winding, 618
Vice versa, 674, 747, 816, 835, 903, 910, 1021 Winding height, 785
Video load resistance, 101 Winding thickness, 785
Video resistance, 73 Wire, 785, 819, 825, 841, 873, 918, 994
Voltage derivative, 222 Wire cross section area, 785
Voltage generator, 2, 46 Wired, 915, 926
Voltage source, 14, 337, 575, 585, 619 Wye-delta transformation, 422, 975
Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR), 573
X
W X–Band, 490
Wait time, 5 X-Ray, 903
Wake up, 72
Watchdog, 105 Z
Wavelength, 875, 876, 904, 950, 981 Zero frequency amplifiers, 910
Wave number, 875 Zeros, 36, 46, 56, 94, 136, 157, 171, 186, 260,
Weak signal, 73 263, 368, 455, 456, 786, 812, 820, 907
White noise, 956 Z–Match network, 970, 973

Вам также может понравиться