Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Microwave
RF Antennas
and Circuits
Nonlinearity Applications in Engineering
Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits
Ofer Aluf
Microwave RF Antennas
and Circuits
Nonlinearity Applications in Engineering
123
Ofer Aluf
Netanya
Israel
v
vi Preface
also suffers from instability under delayed microstrip in time. A PIN diode is
suitable for many applications and operates under high level of injection. The PIN
diode suffers from instability under parameter variations.
Chapter 5. Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis. In this chapter,
power amplifiers (PAs) are analyzed for best performances, and stability was also
discussed. Large-signal or power amplifiers (PAs) are used in the output stages of
audio amplifier systems to derive a load speaker. There are different types
of amplifiers which classified according to their circuit configurations and method
of operation. The classification of amplifiers ranged from linear operation with very
low efficiency to nonlinear operation but with a much higher efficiency, while
others are a compromise between the two. There are two basic amplifier class
groups. The first are the classically controlled conduction angle amplifiers forming
the more common amplifier classes (A, B, AB, and C). The second set of amplifiers
are the newer so-called switching amplifier classes (D, E, F, G, S, T). The most
commonly structured amplifier classes are those that are the most common type of
amplifier class mainly due to their simple design. We analyze the stability of these
amplifiers by inspecting the equivalent circuit differential equations. BJT transistor
is replaced by large-signal model in our analysis. The BJT model is known as the
Gummel–Poon model. The Ebers–Moll BJT model is a good large signal. We use
nonlinear dynamic in our analysis for amplifiers that feed by inputs/outputs exceed
certain limits. LNAs are used in many microwave and RF applications. We analyze
the stability of wideband low-noise amplifier (LNA) with negative feedback under
circuit’s parameter variation.
Chapter 6. Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis. In this
chapter, our oscillator systems are discussed and their stability behavior is analyzed.
Oscillators can be classified into two types: relaxation and harmonic oscillators.
A microwave oscillator is an active device to generate power and a resonator to
control the frequency of the microwave signal. Important issues in oscillators are
frequency stability, frequency tuning, and phase noise. A phase-shift oscillator is a
linear electronic oscillator circuit that produces a sine wave output. The feedback
network “shifts” the phase of the amplifier output by 180° at the oscillation fre-
quency to give positive feedback, total phase shift of 360°. Phase-shift resonator
circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT small-signal (SS) equivalent
circuit model. Closed-loop functioning oscillator can be viewed as feedback sys-
tem. The oscillation is sustained by feeding back a fraction of the output signal,
using an amplifier to gain the signal, and then injecting the energy back into the
tank. Closed-loop functioning oscillator stability is inspected and analyze. There are
types of transistor oscillators which use feedback and lumped inductance and
capacitance resonators. There are three types of transistor LC oscillators, Colpitts,
Hartley, and Clapp. In the Hartley oscillator, the feedback is supplied by the
inductive divider formed by two inductors. We apply the stability criterion of
Liapunov to our system. Colpitts oscillator is the same as Hertley oscillator and
instead of using a tapped inductance, Colpitts oscillator uses a tapped capacitance.
Colpitts oscillator circuit stability analysis is done by criterion of Liapunov.
Preface ix
delays in time for the microstrip line parasitic effects, and stability switching is
inspected for different values of delay variables. A helical antenna is an antenna
consisting of a conducting wire wound in the form of a helix. The helical antennas
are mounted over a ground plane. Helical antennas can operate in one of two
principal modes: normal mode or axial mode. Helix antenna system stability is
inspected under parameter variation.
Chapter 9. Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation Behavior,
Investigation, Comparison and Conclusion. In this chapter, we summarized the
main topics regarding microwave and RF antennas and systems, inspect behavior,
dynamics, stability, comparison, and conclusion. Microwave RF antennas are an
integral part of every RF or microwave system. An antenna is an electrical device
which converts electric power into radio waves, and vice versa. In many wireless
applications, antennas are required by radio receiver or transmitter to couple its
electrical connection to the electromagnetic field. When we inspect system stability
which includes radio waves, we inspect electromagnetic waves which carry signals
through the space (or air) at the speed of light with almost no transmission loss.
There are mainly two categories of antennas. The first is omnidirectional antenna
which receives and/or radiates in all directions. The second is directional antenna
which radiates in a particular direction or pattern. Antennas are characterized by a
number of parameters, radiation pattern, and the resulting gain. Antenna’s gain is
dependent on its power in the horizontal directions, and antenna’s power gain takes
into account the antenna’s efficiency (figure of merit). The physical size of an
antenna is a practical issue, particularly at lower frequencies. Stability analysis
includes a complete RF system with antennas and matching networks.
xi
xii Contents
Control
lines
RF inputs RF outputs
( VjiIN , IjiIN ) ( VjiOUT , IjiOUT )
Microwave
system
Oscillators
xv
xvi Introduction
i¼1 Y
X j¼1
d n VjiIN d n IjiIN
fVjiOUT ; IjiOUT g ¼ f ðVji; IjiÞ ¼ kji ðVjiIN ; IjiIN ; ; Þ
n i
dtn dtn
RFID is short for radio frequency identification; RFID is a dedicated short range
communication (DSRC) technology. The term RFID is used to describe various
technologies that use radio waves to automatically identify people or objects.
With RFID, the electromagnetic or electrostatic coupling in the RF (radio fre-
quency) portion of the electromagnetic spectrum is used to transmit signals. RFID
system consists of an antenna and a transceiver, which read the radio frequency and
transfers the information to a processing device (reader) and a transponder, or RF
tag, which contains the RF circuitry and information to be transmitted. The antenna
provides the means for the integrated circuit to transmit its information to the reader
that converts the radio waves reflected back from the RFID tag into digital infor-
mation that can then be passed on to computers that can analyze the data. In RFID
systems, the tags that hold the data are broken down into two different types.
Passive tags use the radio frequency from the reader to transmit their signal and
Active tags. Passive tags use the radio frequency from the reader to transmit their
signal. Passive tags will generally have their data permanently burned into the tag
when it is made, although some can be rewritten. Active tags are much more
sophisticated and have an on-board battery for power to transmit their data signal
over a greater distance and power random access memory (RAM) giving them the
ability to store up to 32,000 bytes of data. RFID systems can use a variety of
frequencies to communicate, but because radio waves work and act differently at
different frequencies, a frequency for a specific RFID system is often dependent on
its application. An RFID system is always made up of two components:
transponder, which is located on the object to be identified, detector or reader,
which, depending upon design and the technology used, may be a read or write/read
device. There is a need to analyzing RFID systems. The analysis is based on
nonlinear dynamics and chaos models and shows comprehensive benefits and
results. The dynamics of RFID systems provides several ways to use them in a
variety of applications covering wide areas. The analysis fills the gap of analytical
methods for RFID systems analysis, concrete examples, and geometric examples.
The RFID systems analysis is developed systematically, starting with basic passive
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 1
O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_1
2 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
and active RFID systems, differential equations and their bifurcations, followed by
fixed point analysis, limit cycles and their bifurcations. One of the crucial RFID
system optimization is in electromagnetic environmental which faced RFID system
variable delay in time. In some cases RFID system can represent as a delayed
differential equations which, depending on variable parameters and delays. There
are practical guidelines that combine graphical information with analytical work to
effectively study the local stability of models involving delay dependent parame-
ters. The stability of a given steady state is determined by the graphs of some
function [2–4, 85].
Active RFID Tags have a built in power supply, such as a battery, as well as
electronics that perform specialized tasks. By contrast, passive RFID TAGs do not
have a power supply and must rely on the power emitted by an RFID Reader to
transmit data. Thus, if a reader is not present, the passive TAGs can’t communicate
a data. Active TAGs can communicate in the absence of a reader. Active RFID
Tags system energy consumption can be a function of many variables: q(m), u(m), z
(m), t(m), tms(m), when m is the number of TAG IDs which are uniformly dis-
tributed in the interval [0,1). It is very important to emphasize that basic
Active RFID TAG, equivalent circuit is Capacitor (Cic), Resistor (Ric), L (RFID’s
Coil inductance as a function of overall Coil’s parameters) all in parallel and
Voltage generator Vs(t) with serial parasitic resistance. The Voltage generator and
serial parasitic resistance are in parallel to all other Active RFID TAG’s elements
(Cic, Ric, and L (Coil inductance)). The Active RFID TAG equivalent circuit can
be represented as a differential equation which depending on variable parameters.
The investigation of Active RFID’s differential equation based on bifurcation
theory, the study of possible changes in the structure of the orbits of a differential
equation depending on variable parameters. We first illustrate certain observations
and analyze local bifurcations of an appropriate arbitrary scalar differential equa-
tion. Finally, investigate Active RFID TAGs system energy for the best perfor-
mance using an excitable bifurcation diagram. Active RFID Tags have a built in
power supply, such as a battery. The major advantages of an active RFID Tags are:
It can be read at distances of one hundred feet or more, greatly improving the utility
of the device. It may have other sensors that can use electricity for power. The
disadvantages of an active RFID Tags are: The TAG cannot function without
battery power, which limits the lifetime of the TAG. The TAG is typically more
expensive. The TAG is physically larger, which may limit applications. The long
term maintenance costs for an active RFID tag can be greater than those of a passive
Tag if the batteries are replaced. Battery outages in an active TAGs can result in
expensive misreads. Active RFID TAGs may have all or some of the following
1.1 Active RFID TAGs System Analysis of Energy Consumption … 3
Reader Interrogation
Unit signal (query)
TAG n
4 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
(QT). Both work by splitting TAG IDs using queries from the reader until all tags
are read. Binary Tree (BT) relies on TAGs remembering the results of previous
inquiries by the readers. TAGs susceptible to their power supply. Query Tree
(QT) protocol, is a deterministic TAG anti-collision protocol, which is memory loss
with TAGs requiring no additional memory except that required to store their ID
(Fig. 1.2).
The approach to energy aware anti-collision protocols for RFID systems is to
combine the deterministic nature of binary search algorithms along with the sim-
plicity of frame slotted ALOHA to reduce the number of TAG response collisions.
The QT protocol relies on colliding responses to queries that are sent to internal
nodes of a tree to determine the location of TAG ID. Allow tags to transmit
responses within a slotted time frame and thus, try to avoid collisions with
responses from other tags. The energy consumption at the reader is a function of the
number of queries it sends, and number of slots spent in the receive mode. Energy
consumption at an active TAG is a function of the number of queries received by
the TAG and the number of responses it sends back. Neglect the energy spent in
modes other than transmit and receive for simplicity. Assumption: Time slot in
which a reader query or message is sent is equal to the duration as that of a TAG
response. The energy model of the reader is based upon a half-duplex operation.
Reader transmits energy, and its query for a specific period and then wait in
receiving mode with no more energy transmission until the end of the frame. The
flow chart for reader query and TAGs: (Fig. 1.3).
Response mechanism is as below: (Fig. 1.4).
Pulse based half duplex operation is termed as sequential (SEQ) operational
(Fig. 1.5).
Query
(prefix)
TAGn+1 (no
Reader Perfix)
TAG1
(Perfix)
TAG2
(Perfix)
Responds (Perfix
+ TAG ID)
TAGn
(Perfix) TAGn+k (no
Perfix)
Start
n=1
Reader query
(specific prefix)
NO
Reader extends
TAG is resolved and the prefix by
uniquely identified ‘0’ or ‘1’ bit
and continues
the query with
n=n+1 this longer
Fig. 1.5 One slot for a query and F slots reader wait for a response
The power required by the reader to transmit The power required by the reader to receive
PRtx PRrx
The power required by an active TAG to The power required by an active TAG to
transmit receive
PTtx PTrx
Reader energy consumption: q(m) (PRtx + PRrx F) when q(m) is the number
of queries for reading m TAGs. The energy consumption of all active TAGs:
q(m) PTrx + u(m) PTtx when q(m) is the number of reader queries, u(m) is the
number of TAG responses. For MSS scheme (include sleep command) the reader
energy consumption is q(m) (PRtx + PRrx F) + z(m) PRtx. The total energy
consumption for all active TAGs is q(m) PTrx + u(m) PTtx + z(m) PTrx,
when z(m) is the number of sleep commands issued by the reader. The average
analysis of energy consumption:
qðmÞaverage number of reader queires:
uðmÞaverage number of TAG responses:
zðmÞaverage number of sleep commands
issued by the reader ðonly for MSS SchemeÞ
tðmÞaverage number of time slots required to read all TAGs:
tMS ðmÞaverage number of time slots required to read m TAGs
m TAG IDs are uniformly distributed in the interval [0.1]. We get the expression for
one active RFID TAG total energy consumption U(m) = u(m):
1
TAG Power ¼ ½qðmÞ PTrx þ UðmÞ PTtx þ ZðmÞ PTrx
m
LB Voltage
source
Antenna
V(t)
Zt1
dI 1
VL1 ¼ L1 ) I L1 ¼ VL1 dt;
dt L1
0
dVc1 X
4
IC1 ¼ C1 ; Ij ¼ 0
dt j¼1
dV1 dV
V2 ¼ ¼ ; V1 ¼ V
dt dt
dV1 dV2 1 1 1 1 dVsðtÞ
¼ V2 ; ¼ ½ þ V2 V1 þ
dt dt C1 R1 Rs C1 C L Rs C1 dt
! ! 1 1 !
dV1
0 1 V1 0
dt
¼ þ dVsðtÞ
dV2 C11L1 ½C11R1 þ RsC
1
V2 RsC1 dt
1
dt
hl i
1
L1 = Lcalc !
2 Aavg Bavg
X1 ¼ Aavg ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d ðAavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
!
2 Aavg Bavg
X2 ¼ Bavg ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d ðBavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi
X3 ¼ 2 Aavg þ Bavg Aavg2 þ Bavg2 ; X4 ¼ ðAavg þ BavgÞ=4
Active RFID can be considered as a Van der Pol’s system. Van der Pol’s
equation provides an example of an oscillator with nonlinear damping, energy
being dissipated at large amplitudes and generated at low amplitudes. Such systems
typically possess limit cycles, sustained oscillations around a state at which energy
generation and dissipation balance. The basic Van der Pol’s equation can be written
:: :
in the form: X þ a /ðxÞ X þ X ¼ b qðtÞ.
:: 1 1 : 1 1
e 1 ) V C1 þ ð þ ÞV þ V ¼ V_ S ðtÞ
R1 Rs L1 Rs
:: 1 1 1 : 1 1
e1)V þ ð þ ÞV þ V ¼ V_ S ðtÞ
C1 R1 Rs L1 C1 Rs C1
1 1 1 1 1
X ! V; a /ðxÞ ! ð þ Þ; ! 1; V_ S ðtÞ ! b qðtÞ
C1 R1 Rs L1 C1 Rs C1
1.1 Active RFID TAGs System Analysis of Energy Consumption … 9
Let’s define:
:: 1 1 : 1 1
fs ðtÞ ¼ V_ S ðt Þ ) e 1 ) V C1 þ ð þ ÞV þ V ¼ fs ðtÞ
R1 Rs L1 Rs
Unforced investigation: k ¼ 0 ) Rs 1
! 0 ) Rs ! 1 then we return to
Passive RFID TAG since the battery has a very high serial resistance—discon-
nected status. Active RFID equivalent circuit total TAG power is a summation of all
power elements.
X
N X
N
1
Ptotal ¼ pi ¼ TAG Power, pi ¼ ½qðmÞ PTrx þ UðmÞ PTtx þ ZðmÞ PTrx
i¼1 i¼1
m
X
N Zt Zt
0 0
pi ¼ pRs þ pC1 þ pR1 þ pL1 ; energy ) Wðt0 ; tÞ , pðt Þdt ¼ vðt0 Þ iðt0 Þdt0
i¼1
t0 t0
dWðt0 ; tÞ d X N
1
PðtÞtotal ¼ ¼ ½ wi ; energy ) winductor ¼ L I 2
dt dt i¼1 2
Q2
energy ) wcapacitor ¼ ; Presistor ¼ I 2 R; PR1 ¼ IR21 R1 ; PRs ¼ IRs
2
Rs
2C
1 d :
energy ) wL1 ¼ L1 IL21 ) PL1 ¼ wL1 ¼ L IL1 IL1
2 dt
:
Q2 d Q C QC 1
energy ) wC1 ¼ C1 ) PC1 ¼ wC1 ¼ 1
2 C1 dt C1
C1 VC21 d :
energy ) wC1 ¼ ) PC1 ¼ wC1 ¼ C1 VC1 VC1
2 dt
Zt :
VL1 X p QC 1 QC 1
N
1 : :
IL 1 ¼ VL1 dt ) IL1 ¼ ; i ¼ IR1 R1 þ IRs Rs þ L IL1 IL1 þ
2 2
L1 L1 i¼1 C1
0
X
N 2
½V VsðtÞ2 : :
pi ¼ V þ þ L IL1 IL1 þ C1 VC1 VC1
i¼1
R1 Rs
X Zt
N
1 1 2 V VsðtÞ ½VsðtÞ2 V :
pi ¼ V ½ þ
2
þ þ Vdt þ C1 V V
i¼1
R1 Rs Rs Rs L1
0
1 1 1
½qðmÞ PTrx þ UðmÞ PTtx þ ZðmÞ PTrx ¼ V 2 ½ þ
m R1 Rs
2 Zt
2 V VsðtÞ ½Vs ðtÞ V :
þ þ Vdt þ C1 V V
Rs Rs L1
0
dV1 dV2 1 1 1 1
¼ V2 ; ¼ ½ þ V2 V1 þ V_ S ðtÞ
dt dt C1 R1 Rs C1 C1 L1 Rs C1
dU1 dV1
¼ ¼ f ðU1 þ V1 ; U2 þ V2 Þ ¼ f ðV1 ; V2 Þ
dt dt
@f @f
þ U1 þ U2 þ OðU12 ; U22 ; U1 U2 Þ
@V1 @V2
@f @f
(Taylor series expansion). To simplify the notation, we have written @V 1
and @V2
these partial derivatives are to be evaluated at the fixed point ðV1 ; V2 Þ; thus they are
numbers, not functions. Also the shorthand notation OðU12 ; U22 ; U1 U2 Þ denotes
quadratic termss in U1 and U2. Since U1 and U2 are small, these quadratic terms are
extremely small. Similarly, we find
@g @g
dt ¼ U1 @V1 þ U2 @V2 þ OðU1 ; U2 ; U1 U2 Þ, Hence the disturbance (U1, U2)
dU2 2 2
0 dU 1
1 ! !
@f @f
B dt C @V1 @V2 U1
evolves according to @ A ¼ @g @g þ Quadratic terms.
dU2 @V1 @V2 U2
dt !
@f @f
@V1 @V2
The Matrix A ¼ @g @g is called the Jacobian matrix at the fixed
@V1 @V2 ðV1 ;V2 Þ
point ðV1 ; V2 Þ and the Quadratic terms are tiny, it’s tempting to neglect them
altogether. If we do that, we obtain the linearized system.
0 dU 1
1 ! !
@f @f
B dt C @V1 @V2 U1
@ A¼ @g @g
dU2 @V1 @V2 U2
dt
1 1 1 1
f ðV1 ; V2 Þ ¼ V2 ; gðV1 ; V2 Þ ¼ ½
þ V2 V1 þ V_ S ðt)
C1 R1 Rs C1 C1 L1 Rs C1
@f @f @g 1 @g 1 1
¼ 0; ¼ 1; ¼ ; ¼ ð þ Þ
@V1 @V2 @V1 C1 L1 @V2 C1 R1 Rs C1
0 dU 1
1 !
B dt C 0 1 U1
@ A¼ C11L1 ½C11R1 þ
RC1
1
dU2 U2
dt
:: 1 1 1 : 1 1
e 1 ) V þð þ Þ V þ V ¼ V_ S ðtÞ
R1 Rs C1 L1 C1 Rs C1
1 1 1 1 1
then /ðxÞ ¼ 1; a ¼ ½ð þ Þ ; ! 1ðL1 C1 1Þ; b ¼
R1 Rs C1 L1 C1 Rs C1
dh : 1 1 1 : 1
h¼t) ¼ 1; V ¼ Y ð þ Þ /ðVÞ; Y ¼ V þ V_ S ðhÞ
dt R1 Rs C1 R1 C1
:
h ¼ 1; ðV; Y; hÞ 2 R2 x S1 :
2
This system is correct at first order, but there is an error of Oð½ðR11 þ RsÞ
1
C11 Þ .
In polar coordinates, we therefore have
: r 1 1 1 r2 1 1 1 2
r¼ ð þ Þ ð1 Þ þ Oð½ð þ Þ Þ
2 R1 Rs C1 4 R1 Rs C1
: 1 1 1 2
u ¼ 0 þ Oð½ð þ Þ Þ
R1 Rs C1
2
Neglecting the Oð½ðR11 þ Rs
1
Þ C11 Þ terms this system has an attracting circle of
fixed points at r = 2 reflecting the existence of a one parameter family of almost
sinusoidal solutions: V ¼ rðtÞ cosðt þ uðtÞÞ with slowly varying amplitude
1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2
rðtÞ ¼ 2 þ Oð½ð þ Þ Þ; uðtÞ ¼ u0 þ Oð½ð þ Þ Þ
R1 Rs C1 R1 Rs C1
2
1 1 1
uðtÞ ¼ u0 þ Oð½ð þ Þ Þ
R1 Rs C1
: 1 1 1 x2 1
n1 ¼ ð þ Þ /ðVÞ cosðx tÞ ð Þ V sinðx tÞ
R1 Rs C1 x
1
sinðx t V_ S ðtÞÞ
Rs C1 x
: 1 1 1 x2 1
n2 ¼ ð þ Þ /ðVÞ sinðx tÞ ð Þ V cosðx tÞ
R1 Rs C1 x
1
cosðx t V_ S ðtÞÞ
Rs C1 x
1
C1 L1 ! 1; /ðVÞ ¼ 1 in our case.
14 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
: 1 1 1 x2 1 1
n1 ¼ ð þ Þ cosðx tÞ ð Þ V sinðx tÞ sinðx t V_ S ðtÞÞ
R1 Rs C1 x Rs C1 x
: 1 1 1 x2 1 1
n2 ¼ ð þ Þ sinðx tÞ ð Þ V cosðx tÞ cosðx t V_ S ðtÞÞ
R1 Rs C1 x Rs C1 x
I-CODE RFID
TAG
LA LB
Fig. 1.8 NXP/PHILIPS ICODE IC, Parallel equivalent circuit and simplified complete equivalent
circuit of the label (L1 is the antenna inductance)
X
i¼3 Zt¼t1
V dV 1
Ii ¼ 0; þ C1 þ V dt ¼ 0
i¼1
R1 dt L1
t¼0
1 dV d2V 1
þ C1 2 þ V ¼0
R1 dt dt L1
We get differential equation of RFID TAG system which describe the evolution
of the system in continues time. V = V(t).
Now I define the following Variable setting definitions:, And get the dynamic
dt ¼ V2 , dt ¼ C1 R1 V2 C1 L1 V1
equation system: dV 1 dV2 1 1
dV1 dV2
¼ f1 ðV1 ; V2 . . .; VnÞ;
dt dt
The V1 and V2 variables are the phase space dimension two. Now Let’s Move to
three variable system—which the time (t) is the third variable, V3 = t (Fig. 1.9).
Aavg
A0
w B0 Bavg
!
2 Aavg Bavg
X1 ¼ Aavg ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d ðAavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
!
2 Aavg Bavg
X2 ¼ Bavg ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d ðBavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi
X3 ¼ 2 Aavg þ Bavg Aavg þ Bavg ; X4 ¼ ðAavg þ BavgÞ=4
2 2
Now I integrate the Lcalc value inside the differential equations which charac-
terize the RFID system with the Coil inductance.
1.2 RFID TAG’s Dimensional Parameters Optimization … 17
dV1
¼ 0 V1 þ 1 V2 þ 0 V3
dt
dV2 1 1
¼ V1 V2 þ 0 V3
dt C1 lp0 ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp C1 R1
dV3
¼ 0 V1 þ 0 V2 þ 0 V3 þ 1
dt
1
K1 ¼ K1 ða0 ; b0 ; w; g; d; NC ; t; p; C1 ; R1 Þ ¼ f l0 g
C1 p ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
1
K2 ¼ K2 ða0 ; b0 ; w; g; d; NC ; t; p; C1 ; R1 Þ ¼ f g
C1 R1
Denote the RFID Matrix systems with those K1, K2 parameter function gives:
dV1
0 1 V1
dt
dV2 ¼
dt
K1 K2 V2
Now the consideration of trajectories of the form [3]: VðtÞ ¼ ekt S, Where
S <> 0 is some fixed vector to be determined, and k is a growth rate, also to be
determined. If a such solution exists, they correspond to exponential motion along
the line spanned by the vector S. To find the condition on S and k, we substitute
: 0 1
VðtÞ ¼ ekt S into V ¼ A V; A ¼ and obtain k ekt S ¼ ekt A S
K1 K2
and cancellation the nonzero scalar factor ekt yields to k S ¼ A S which state that
the desired straight line solutions exist if S is an eigenvector of A with corre-
sponding eigenvalue k and the solution is Eigen solution. The eigenvalues of a
matrix A are given by the characteristic equation detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 when I is the
1 0
identity matrix I ¼ , we get
0 1
18 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
D ¼ detðAÞ ¼ 0 K1 ¼ K1
s ¼ traceðAÞ ¼ 0 þ K2 ¼ K2
k2 s k þ D ¼ 0
k2 K2 k K1 ¼ 0
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1
k1;2 ¼ K2
K22 þ 4 K1
2 2
The above k1;2 is a quadratic solution. The typical solution is for the eigenvalues
are distinct k1 6¼ k2 . In this case, a theorem of linear algebra states that the cor-
responding eigenvectors S1 and S2 are linearly independent, and hence span the
entire plane. Any initial condition V0 can be written as a linear combination of
eigenvectors, V0 ¼ C1 S1 þ C2 S2 . Then the general solution for V(t) it is simply
VðtÞ ¼ C1 ek1 t S1 þ C2 ek2 t S2 . By insertion quadratic solutions into the last
V(t) equation we get
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
VðtÞ ¼ C1 e½2K2 þ 2 K2 þ 4K1 t S1 þ C2 e½2K2 2 K2 þ 4K1 t S2
1 1 2 1 1 2
RFID TAG which gives the best performance is one that his equivalent circuit
(Capacitor, Resistor, and Inductance (Antenna) in parallel), and his Voltage/Voltage
derivative respect to time phase plane converge (Spiral converge, fixed point
respect to the origin, etc.,)
k2 \k1 \0
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 1 1
K2 K22 þ 4 K1 \ K2 þ K22 þ 4 K1 \0
2 2 2 2
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
k1 \0. . . ! . . . K2 [ K22 þ 4 K1
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2
1 1 1
f g [ f g þ 4 f l0 g
C1 R1 C1 R1 C1 p ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2
1 1 4
[ f g f g
C1 R1 C1 R1 C1 lp0 ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
k2 \k1
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 1 1
K2 K22 þ 4 K1 \ K2 þ K22 þ 4 K1
2 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 2 2
0\ K22 þ 4 K1 ! K22 þ 4 K1 [ 0 ! K22 [ 4 K1
2
1 1
f g [ 4 f l g
C1 R1 C1 p ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
0
2
1 4
f g [ l0
C1 R1 C1 p ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
1.2 RFID TAG’s Dimensional Parameters Optimization … 19
Then both Eigen solutions decay exponentially. The fixed point is a stable node,
except eigenvectors are not mutually perpendicular, in general. Trajectories typi-
cally approach the origin tangent to the slow Eigen direction, defined as the
direction spanned by the eigenvector with the smaller jkj . In backward time t ! 1
the trajectories become parallel to the fast Eigen direction [2–4] (Fig. 1.10).
If we reverse all the arrows in the above figure, we obtain a typical phase portrait
for an unstable node. Now I investigate the case when eigenvalues are complex
number. If the eigenvalues are complex, the fixed point is either a center or a spiral.
The origin is surrounded by a family of closed orbits. Note that centers are neutrally
stable, since nearby trajectories are neither attracted to nor repelled from the fixed
point. A spiral would occur if the RFID system were lightly damped. Then the
trajectory would just fail to close, because the RFID system loses a bit of energy on
each cycle. To justify these statements, recall that the eigenvalues are
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
k1;2 ¼ 12 K2
12 K22 þ 4 K1 ; K22 þ 4 K1 \0
To simplify the notation, let’s write the eigenvalues as
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1
k1;2 ¼ a
i x ; a ¼ K2 ; x ¼ K22 þ 4 K1
2 2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
x 6¼ 0 9 VðtÞ ¼ C1 e½2 2 2 2
K þ 1
S1 þ C2 e½2K2 2 K2 þ 4K1 t S2
1 1
K 2 þ 4K t 1 1 2
V1
20 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
respectively. If the eigenvalues are pure imaginary a ¼ 0, then all the solutions are
periodic with period T ¼ 2px . The oscillators have fixed amplitude and the fixed
point is centered. For both centers and spirals, it’s easy to determine whether the
rotation is clockwise or counterclockwise (Fig. 1.11).
1 1
a¼ K2 ¼ f g
2 2 C1 R1
1 1
Decaying oscillators 8 a\0 ! f g\0 ! [0
2 C1 R1 2 C1 R1
1 1
Growing oscillators 8 a [ 0 ! f g[0 ! \0
2 C1 R1 2 C1 R1
C1, R1 > 0 always then only the first behavior, decaying oscillator can exist in
our RFID system. In all analysis until now, we have been assuming that the
eigenvalues are distinct. What happens if the eigenvalues are equal? Suppose
eigenvalues are equal k1 ¼ k2 ¼ k, then there are two possibilities: either there are
two independent eigenvectors corresponding to k, or there’s only one. If there are
two independent eigenvectors, then they span the plane and so every vector is an
eigenvector with this same eigenvalue k . To see this, let’s write an arbitrary vector
X0 as a linear combination of the two eigenvectors: X0 = C1 S1 + C2 S2.
Then A X0 ¼ A ðC1 S1 þ C2 S2 Þ ¼ C1 k S1 þ C2 k S2 ¼ k X0
X0 is also an eigenvector with eigenvalue k . Since the multiplication by A
simply stretches
every vector by a factor k, the matrix must be a multiple of the
k 0
identity: A ¼ then if k 6¼ 0, all trajectories are straight lines through the
0 k
origin XðtÞ ¼ ekt X0 and the fixed point is a star node. On the other hand, if k = 0
the whole plane is filled with fixed points. Let’s now sketch the above options with
RFID Overall parameter restriction. k1 ¼ k2 ¼ k 6¼ 0 then (Fig. 1.12)
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 1 1
K2 þ K22 þ 4 K1 ¼ K2 K22 þ 4 K1
2 ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
q 2 2 2
K22 þ 4 K1 ¼ 0 ! K22 þ 4 K1 ¼ 0 ! K22 ¼ 4 K1
l0
½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp ¼ C1 4 R21
p
1.2 RFID TAG’s Dimensional Parameters Optimization … 21
V1
Now let’s summarize the classification of fixed points in RFID system based on
all investigation I did. It is easy to show the type and stability of all the different
fixed points on a single diagram [4] (Figs. 1.13 and 1.14).
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s2 4 D ¼ K22 þ 4 K1 ¼ 0; ! K2 ¼ 2 K1
s ¼ traceðAÞ ¼ K2 ; D ¼ detðAÞ ¼ K1
1 h pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffii
k2 K2 k K1 ¼ 0; k1;2 ¼ s
s2 4 D
2
s ¼ k1 þ k2 ¼ K2 ; D ¼ k1 k2 ¼ K1
Charecteristic equation : ðk k1 Þ ðk k2 Þ ¼ k2 s k þ D ¼ 0
Unstable
spirals
Saddle
points Centers
stable
spirals
stable
nodes
22 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
degenerate nodes live on this parabola. The stability of the nodes and spirals is
determined by s value. When s\0, both eigenvalues have negative real parts, so
the fixed point is stable. Unstable spirals and nodes have s [ 0 . Neutrally stable
centers live on the borderline s ¼ 0, where eigenvalues are purely imaginary [5].
The RFID TAG system has two main variables TAG’s voltage and TAG’s voltage
derivative respect to time. Due to electromagnetic interferences those variables have
delays in time domain. We define s1 as a time delay respect to TAG’s voltage and
s2 as a time delay respect to TAG’s voltage derivative. RFID Equivalent circuits of
a Label can be represented as Parallel circuit of Capacitance (Cpl), Resistance
(Rpl), and Inductance (Lpc). Our RFID TAG system delay differential and delay
different model can be analytically by using delay differential equations in
dynamically. The need of the incorporation of a time delay is often of the existence
of any stage structure. It is often difficult to analytically study models with delay
dependent parameters, even if only a single discrete delay is present. There are
practical guidelines that combine graphical information with analytical work to
effectively study the local stability of models involving delay dependent parame-
ters. The stability of a given steady state is simply determined by the graphs of
some function of s1, s2 which can be expressed, explicitly and thus can be easily
depicted by Matlab and other popular software. We need only look at one such
function and locate the zero. This function often has only two zeroes, providing
thresholds for stability switches. As time delay increases, stability changes from
stable to unstable to stable. We emphasize the local stability aspects of some models
with delay dependent parameters. Additionally, there is a general geometric
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 23
criterion that, theoretically speaking, can be applied to models with many delays, or
even distributed delays. The simplest case of a first order characteristic equation,
providing more user friendly geometric and analytic criteria for stability switches.
The analytical criteria provided for the first and second order cases can be used to
obtain some insightful analytical statements and can be helpful for conducting
simulations. RFID TAG can be represented as a parallel Equivalent Circuit of
Capacitor and Resistor in parallel. For example, see below NXP/PHILIPS
ICODE IC, Parallel equivalent circuit and simplified complete equivalent circuit
of the label (L1 is the antenna inductance) [6, 8] (Fig. 1.15).
1 dV d2 V 1
þ C1 2 þ V ¼0
R1 dt dt L1
We get differential equation of a RFID TAG system which describe the evo-
lution of the system in continues time. V = V(t). Now I define the following
Variable setting definitions: V2 ¼ dV dt ¼ dt ; V1 ¼ V. The dynamic equation system:
1 dV
Antenn
24 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
w B0 Bavg
!
2 Aavg Bavg
X1 ¼ Aavg ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d ðAavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
!
2 Aavg Bavg
X2 ¼ Bavg ln pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d ðBavg þ Aavg2 þ Bavg2 Þ
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi
X3 ¼ 2 Aavg þ Bavg Aavg2 þ Bavg2 ; X4 ¼ ðAavg þ BavgÞ=4
The RFID’s coil calculation inductance is Lcalc ¼ lp0 ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
L1 = Lcalc. Definition of limits, Estimations: Track thickness t, Al and Cu coils
(t > 30 lm).
dV1 " #
0 1 V1
dt
dV2 ¼ f C l0
1
g f C11R1 g V2
dt ½
1 p ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
dV1
¼ V2 ðt s2 Þ
dt
dV2 1 1
¼ f g V1 ðt s1 Þ V2 ðt s2 Þ
dt C1 lp0 ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp C1 R1
To find the Equilibrium points (fixed points) of the RFID TAG system is by
ð0Þ ð0Þ
We get two equations and the only fixed point is E ð0Þ ðV1 ; V2 Þ ¼ ð0; 0Þ.
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the equi-
librium points of RFID TAG system consists in adding to coordinate [V1 ; V2
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form, and retaining the first order terms
in v1, v2. The system of two homogeneous equations leads to a polynomial char-
acteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The polynomial characteristic equations
accept by set the below voltage and voltage derivative respect to time into two
RFID TAG system equations. RFID TAG system fixed values with arbitrarily small
increments of exponential form ½v1 v2 ekt are: i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1
(second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point).
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V1 ðtÞ ¼ V1 þ v1 ekt ; V2 ðtÞ ¼ V2 þ v2 ekt ;
ðiÞ
V1 ðt s1 Þ ¼ V1 þ v1 ekðts1 Þ
ðiÞ
V2 ðt s2 Þ ¼ V2 þ v2 ekðts2 Þ 8 i ¼ 0; 1; 2
We choose the above expressions for our V1 ðtÞ; V2 ðtÞ as small displacement
[v1 ; v2 ] from the system fixed points in time t = 0.
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V1 þ v1 ; V2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V2 þ v2
k<0 k>0
t=0 V1(t = 0) = V(i)
1 + v1 V1(t = 0) = V(i)
1 + v1
V2(t = 0) = V(i)
2 + v2 V2(t = 0) = V(i)
2 + v2
t>0 V1(t) = V(i)
1 + v1e−|k|t V1(t) = V(i)
1 + v1e|k|t
−|k|t
V2(t) = V(i)
2 + v2e V2(t) = V(i)
2 + v2e
|k|t
The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for RFID TAG
system voltage and voltage derivative respect to time are
ðiÞ ðiÞ
dV1 ðtÞ V1 ðt þ DtÞ V1 ðtÞ V þ v1 ekðt þ DtÞ ½V1 þ v1 ekt
¼ lim ¼ lim 1
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
v1 ekt ½ekDt 1 ekDt 1 þ kDt v1 ekt ½1 þ k Dt 1
¼ lim ! lim ¼ k v1 ekt
Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
dV2 ðtÞ V2 ðt þ DtÞ V2 ðtÞ V þ v2 ekðt þ DtÞ ½V2 þ v2 ekt
¼ lim ¼ lim 2
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
v2 ekt ½ekDt 1 ekDt 1 þ kDt v2 ekt ½1 þ k Dt 1
¼ lim ! lim ¼ k v2 ekt
Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
ðiÞ ði¼0Þ
k v1 ekt ¼ V2 þ v2 ekt ; V2 ¼ 0 ; k v1 þ v 2 ¼ 0
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 27
dV2
Second, we take the RFID TAG’s voltage (V2) differential equation: ¼
dt
1 1
f hl ig V1 ðtÞ V2 ðtÞ and adding to its
C1 0
½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 N c
p C1 R1
p
coordinates [V1V2] arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½v1 v2 ekt and
retaining the first order terms in v1, v2.
dV2 1 1
¼ f hl ig V1 ðtÞ V2 ðtÞ
dt C1 0
½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 N pc C1 R1
p
1
kt
k v2 e ¼ f hl ig ðV1ðiÞ þ v1 ekt Þ
C1 0
½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 N cp
p
1 ðiÞ
ðV2 þ v2 ekt Þ
C1 R1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V1 ¼ 0; V2 ¼ 0
1 1
k v2 f l0 g v1 v2 ¼ 0
C1 ½ ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp C1 R1
p
1 1
f l0 g v1 k v2 v2 ¼ 0
C1 ½ ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Nc p C 1 R1
p
0 1 !
k 1
v
@ f l 1
g k C11R1 A
1
¼0
C1 ½
0
½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp v2
p
0 1
k 1
A k I ¼ @ f l 1
g k C11R1 A ;
C1 ½
0
½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
p
detðA k IÞ ¼ 0
1 1
k ðk þ Þþ l0 ¼0
C1 R1 C1 ½ ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
p
0\k1 ¼ k2 then we have repelling focus. If k1 ; k2 are complex conjugate and the
real part is negative than we have attracting spiral otherwise (positive real part)
repelling spiral. If the real part is zero then we have a center. We define
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V1 ðt s1 Þ ¼ V1 þ v1 ekðts1 Þ ; V2 ðt s2 Þ ¼ V2 þ v2 ekðts2 Þ :
Then we get two delayed differential equations respect to adding to its coordi-
nates [V1V2] arbitrarily small increments of exponential form½v1 v2 ekt .
ðiÞ ði¼0Þ
v1 k ekt ¼ V2 þ v2 ekðts2 Þ ; V2 ¼ 0 ) v1 k ekt ¼ v2 ekðts2 Þ
1 1
k v2 ekt ¼ f l0 g V1ðiÞ V
ðiÞ
C1 p ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Nc p C1 R1 2
1
þ f l g v1 ekðts1 Þ
C1 p ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
0
1
v2 ekðts2 Þ
C1 R1
ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ
In the equilibrium fixed point V1 ¼V2 ¼ 0 and in the equilibrium fixed
point
ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ 1 1
V1 ¼ V2 ¼ 0; f l0 g V1ðiÞ ðiÞ
V2 ¼ 0
C1
p ½ X1 þ X2 X 3 þ X 4 Nc p C 1 R 1
1 1
k v2 ekt ¼ f g v1 e kðts 1 Þ
v2 ekðts2 Þ
C1 lp0 ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp C 1 R1
We define f# ðX1 ; X2 ; etc:. . .Þ ¼ lp0 ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp . The small
increments Jacobian of our RFID TAG system:
" # !
k eks2 v1
¼ 0;
C11f# eks1 C11R1 eks2 k v2
" #
k eks2
AkI ¼
C11f# eks1 C11R1 eks2 k
1 1
det jA k Ij ¼ 0; Dðk; s1 ; s2 Þ ¼ k2 þ k eks2 þ ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
C1 R1 C 1 f#
resulting from the increase of the value of the time delay s for the general char-
acteristic equation Dðk; sÞ. Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ eks
Pn
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ
k
k¼0
P1 ðsÞ k þ P2 ðsÞ k þ P3 ðsÞ k þ . . .:
2 3
P
m
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ
k¼0
q1 ðsÞ k þ q2 ðsÞ k2 þ . . ..
First, we analyze RFID Tag system second order characteristic equation for. The
first case we analyze is when there is a delay in RFID Label voltage and no delay in
voltage time derivative [4, 5].
1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k2 þ k þ eks1 ;
C1 R1 C1 f#
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ eks
X
n
1
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ k þ P2 ðsÞ k ¼ k þ k ;
k 2 2
k¼0
C1 R1
1
P2 ðsÞ ¼ 1; P1 ðsÞ ¼ ; P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0
C1 R1
P
m
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ: Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ ¼ C 1f . Our RFID sys-
1 #
k¼0
tem second order characteristic equation: Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ k þ bðsÞ k eks þ
cðsÞ þ dðsÞ eks
Then aðsÞ ¼ C11R1 ; bðsÞ ¼ 0; cðsÞ ¼ 0; dðsÞ ¼ C11f# s 2 R þ 0 and aðsÞ; bðsÞ;
cðsÞ; dðsÞ : R þ 0 ! R are differentiable functions of the class C1 ðR þ 0 Þ, such that
cðsÞ þ dðsÞ ¼ C11f# 6¼ 0 for all s 2 R þ 0 and for any s; bðsÞ; dðsÞ are not simulta-
neously zero. We have
30 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
1
Pðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ k þ cðkÞ ¼ k2 þ k
C1 R1
1
Qðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ bðsÞ k þ dðsÞ ¼
C1 f#
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðkÞ can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is, for any real number; C11f# x2 þ i x C11R1 6¼ 0
Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4 þ x2 ðC 1
2 ðC 1
2 ; Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies
1 R1 Þ 1 f# Þ
x4 þ x2 ðC 1
2 ðC 1
2 ¼ 0 and its roots are given by
1 R1 Þ 1 f# Þ
1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1
x2þ ¼ fðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ þ Dg ¼ f D g;
2 2 ðC1 R1 Þ2
1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1
x2 ¼ fðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ Dg ¼ f D þ g
2 2 ðC1 R1 Þ2
1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1
x2 ¼ fðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ Dg ¼ f D þ g;
2 2 ðC1 R1 Þ2
1 2 1
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ 4 ðc2 d 2 Þ ¼ ½ð Þ2 2
C12 f# R1
pffiffiffiffi
Therefore the following holds: 2 x2þ = ðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ ¼
D;
pffiffiffiffi
2 x2þ = þ 1
ðC1 R1 Þ2
¼
D
Furthermore
1
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ cðsÞ x2 ðsÞ ¼ x2 ðsÞ; PI ði x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ aðsÞ ¼ xðsÞ
C1 R1
1
QR ði x; sÞ ¼ dðsÞ ¼ ; QI ði x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ bðsÞ ¼ 0
C1 f#
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 31
Hence
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
ðc x2 Þ x b þ x a d f#
sin hðsÞ ¼ ¼x ;
x b þd
2 2 2 R1
ðc x2 Þ d þ x2 a b
cos hðsÞ ¼ ¼ x2 C1 f#
x 2 b2 þ d 2
1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ k eks2 þ eks2
C1 R1 C1 f#
1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ ðk þ Þ eks ;
C1 R1 C1 f#
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ eks
P
n
Pn ðk; sÞ Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ
k
The expression for is
k¼0
P1 ðsÞ k þ P2 ðsÞ k ¼ k
2 2
X
m
1 1
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ k þ ;
k¼0
C1 R1 C1 f#
1 1
q0 ðsÞ ¼ ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ ; q2 ðsÞ ¼ 0
C1 f# C1 R1
32 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðkÞ can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is, for any real number x; pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0
1 1
x2 þ i x 6¼ 0;
C 1 f# C1 R1
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ ðc x2 Þ2 þ x2 a2 ðx2 b2 þ d 2 Þ
Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4 x2 ðC 1
2 ðC 1
2
1 R1 Þ 1 f# Þ
given by
1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1
x2þ ¼ fðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ þ Dg ¼ f D þ g;
2 2 ðC1 R1 Þ2
1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1
x2 ¼ fðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ Dg ¼ f D þ g
2 2 ðC1 R1 Þ2
1 2 1
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ 4 ðc2 d 2 Þ ¼ 2 ½ð Þ2 þ 2
C1 f# R1
Furthermore
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ cðsÞ x2 ðsÞ ¼ x2 ðsÞ;
1
PI ði x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ aðsÞ ¼ 0; QR ði x; sÞ ¼ dðsÞ ¼
C 1 f#
1
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ bðsÞ ¼ xðsÞ ;
C1 R1
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ ;
jQði x; sÞj2
ðc x2 Þ x b þ x a d x3 C1 R1
sin hðsÞ ¼ ¼
x2 b2 þ d 2 x2 þ ðRf 1 Þ2 #
ðc x Þ d þ x a b
2 2 x C1 Rf#1
2
cos hðsÞ ¼ ¼
x 2 b2 þ d 2 x2 þ ðRf#1 Þ2
k¼0
P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0:
34 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
P
m
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ k k
¼ k C11R1 þ 1
C1 f# eks
k¼0
Taylor expansion: eks 1 k s þ k2 s2
2 since we need n > m [BK] analysis
we choose eks 1 k s.
X
m
1 1 s 1
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ k ð Þþ ;
k¼0
C1 R1 f# C1 f#
1 1 1 s
q0 ðs; kÞ ¼ ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ; q2 ðsÞ ¼ 0
C1 f# C1 R1 f#
And in the same manner like our previous case analysis: Pðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ ¼
k2 ; Qðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ k C11 ðR11 fs# Þ þ C11f#
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary
roots. That is, for any real number x; pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0
1 1 s 1
x2 þ i x ð Þþ 6¼ 0;
C1 R1 f# C1 f#
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2 ; Pði x; sÞ ¼ x2
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x2 ; PI ði x; sÞ ¼ 0;
1 1 s 1
Qðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ i x ð Þ þ
C1 R1 f# C1 f#
1 1 s 1
QI ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x ð Þ; QR ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼
C1 R1 f# C 1 f#
jPði x; sÞj2 ¼ P2I þ P2R ; jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ Q2I þ Q2R ;
jPði x; sÞj2 ¼ P2I þ P2R ¼ x4
1 1 s 1
jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ x2 2 ð Þ2 þ ;
C1 R1 f# ðC1 f# Þ2
1 1 s 1
Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4 x2 2 ð Þ2
C1 R1 f# ðC1 f# Þ2
1 1 s 1 1 s
Fx ¼ 4 x3 2 x ð Þ2 ¼ 2 x ½2 x2 2 ð Þ2 ;
C12 R1 f# C 1 R 1 f#
2 x2 1 s
Fs ¼ ð Þ
C12 f# R1 f#
PIx ¼ 0; PRx ¼ 2 x;
1 1 s
QIx ¼ ½ ; QRx ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0; PRs ¼ 0
C1 R1 f#
x
QIs ¼ ; QRs ¼ 0
C1 f#
x
C12 f#
ðR11 fs# Þ
And we get the expression: xs ¼
2 x2 C12 ðR11 fs# Þ2
1
Defines the maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0
Defines the maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and dif-
ferentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1 (see Appendix A). Hence we use theorem 1.2.
This proves the theorem 1.3 and theorem 1.4 (see Appendix D).
Remark Taylor approximation for eks 1 k s giving us a good stability
analysis, approximation only for a restricted delay time interval.
Now we discuss RFID TAG system stability analysis under delayed variables in
time. Our RFID homogeneous system for v1, v2 leads to a characteristic equation
for the eigenvalue k having the form PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0; first case
s1 ¼s; s2 ¼ 0. Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k2 þ k C11R1 þ C11f# eks1 . We use different
parameters terminology from our last characteristics parameters definition:
k ! j; pk ðsÞ ! aj ; qk ðsÞ ! cj ; n ¼ 2; m ¼ 0
P
2
Additionally Pn ðk; sÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ ! QðkÞ then PðkÞ ¼ aj k j and
j¼0
P
0
QðkÞ ¼ cj k j .
j¼0
1 1
PðkÞ ¼ k2 þ k ; QðkÞ ¼ n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m
C1 R1 C1 f#
36 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
2 2
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj jQði xÞj ; Fðx; sÞ
1 1
¼ x4 þ x2 2
ðC1 R1 Þ ðC1 f# Þ2
In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have, and Qði xÞ ¼
Qði xÞ thus, x [ 0 may be an eigenvalue of the characteristic equation. The
analysis consists in identifying the roots of the characteristic equation situated on
the imaginary axis of the complex k-plane, whereby increasing the parameters
C1 ; R1 ; antenna parametrs and delay s, Rek may, at the crossing, Change its sign
ð0Þ ð0Þ
from (−) to (+), i.e. from stable focus Eð0Þ ðV1 ; V2 Þ ¼ ð0; 0Þ to an unstable one, or
vice versa.
This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial
derivatives with respect to C1 ; R1 and antenna parameters.
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 37
@Rek
^1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; R1 ; antenna parameters ¼ const
@C1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðR1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; antenna parameters ¼ const
@R1 k¼ix
@Rek @Rek
^1 ðf# Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ¼ const; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ;
@f# k¼ix @s k¼ix
antenna parameters ¼ const; where x 2 R þ :
1
PR ði xÞ ¼ a2 x2 þ a0 ¼ x2 ; PI ði xÞ ¼ a3 x3 þ a1 x ¼ x
C1 R1
1
QR ði xÞ ¼ c2 x2 þ c0 ¼ ; QI ði xÞ ¼ c1 x ¼ 0 ; FðxÞ ¼ 0
C1 f#
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
u 1 1 1 1 1 1
x¼
t
þ4 ; þ4 [0
2 4 2 4
2 ðC1 R1 Þ 2 ðC1 R1 Þ ½C1 f# ðC1 R1 Þ ½C1 f# 2
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Always and additional for x 2 R; 1
2ðC1 R1 Þ2
12 1
ðC R Þ4
þ 4 ½C f1 2 [ 0
1 1 1 #
Not exist and always negative for any RFID TAG overall parameter values.
Writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, and inserting
k¼ix
Into the RFID characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin x s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos x s ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
Then there are no positive xðsÞ solutions of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have
stability switches. For any s 2 I, where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0
We can define the angle hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2 p as the solution of
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ s ¼ hðsÞ þ n 2 p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that is continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; R1 ; C1 and RFID TAG antenna parameters
ðw; g; B0 ; A0 ; Aavg ; Bavg ; etc:; Þ indicate the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us
first concentrate on ^ðxÞ, remember in kðR1 ; C1 ; w; g; B0 ; A0 ; Aavg ; Bavg ; etc:; Þ and
xðR1 ; C1 ; w; g; B0 ; A0 ; Aavg ; Bavg ; etc:; Þ, and keeping all parameters except one
(x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiating
RFID characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific
parameter (x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark x ¼ R1 ; C1 ; w; g; B0 ; A0 ; Aavg ; Bavg ; etc:;
We define U and V:
U ¼ ðPR PIx PI PRx Þ ðQR QIx QI QRx Þ
V ¼ ðPR PIx PI PRx Þ ðQR QIx QI QRx Þ
x2 1
U¼ ; P2 ¼ x4 þ x2 ;
C1 R1 ðC1 R1 Þ2
@F 1
Fs ¼ 0; ¼ Fx ¼ 2 ½2 x3 þ x
@x ðC1 R1 Þ2
Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g
@s k¼ix
@x U @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g signfs þxþ g;
@s jPj2
@x Fs @x
¼ xs ¼ ; Fs ¼ 0 ) ¼0
@s Fx @s
Taylor expansion:
k2 s 2
eks 1 k s þ
2
40 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
Since we need n > m [BK] analysis, we choose eks 1 k s then we get our
RFID system second order characteristic equation:
given by
1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi 1 1 s
x2þ ¼ fðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ þ Dg ¼ f D þ 2 ð Þ2 g
2 2 C1 R1 f#
1 p ffiffiffi
ffi 1 p ffiffiffi
ffi 1 1 s
x2 ¼ fðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ Dg ¼ f D þ 2 ð Þ2 g
2 2 C1 R1 f#
1 1 s 4
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ 4 ðc2 d 2 Þ ¼ 2 ð Þ2 þ
C1 R1 f# ðC1 f# Þ2
pffiffiffiffi
Therefore the following holds: 2 x2þ = ðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ ¼
D
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
ðc x2 Þ d þ x2 a b x2 C11f#
cos hðsÞ ¼ ¼
x 2 b2 þ d 2 x2 1 1
ð fs# Þ2 þ 1
C12 R1 ðC1 f# Þ2
For our stability switching analysis, we choose typical RFID parameter values:
Then
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 41
1 1
¼ 1:89 1021 ; 2 2 ¼ 2:69 1026
C12 C1 f#
s x
0.001 1.64 1010
0.01 1.64 1011
0.05 8.2 1011
0.1 1.64 1012
(continued)
42 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
(continued)
s x
0.2 3.28 1012
1 1.64 1013
5 8.2 1013
10 1.64 1014
@Rek 2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@s Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
@Rek 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
@Rek
gðTauÞ ¼ ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s k¼ix
The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of
Remark we know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies its roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which xi is a complex or imag-
inary number, then unable to analyze stability [4, 5].
RFID TAGs environment is characterized by electromagnetic interferences
which can influence the RFID TAGs stability in time. There are two main RFID
1.3 RFID TAGs Coil’s System Stability … 43
xðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ, this pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary roots cross the
imaginary axis from left to right if d ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from
right to left If d ðs Þ\0 where d ðs Þ ¼ signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix ðs Þ g ¼
n ðsÞ
signfdSds js¼s g. If x þ ðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ ¼ xðs Þ then dðs Þ ¼ 0 and
signfdRek j
ds k¼ixðs Þ
0
g ¼ 0, the same is true when S ðs Þ ¼ 0. The following result can
n
be useful in identifying values of s where the stability switches happened.
Theorem 1.4 Assume that for all s 2 I, xðsÞ is defined as a solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼
0 then d
ðsÞ ¼ signf
D1=2 ðsÞg signD
ðsÞ
D
ðsÞ ¼ x2
½ðx2
b2 þ d 2 Þ þ a0 ðc x2
Þ þ b d 0 b0 d a c0
þ x
x0
½s ðx2
b2 þ d 2 Þ b d þ a ðc x2
Þ þ 2 x2
a
A semi-passive tags operate similarly to passive RFID tags. However, they contain
a battery that enables long reading distance and also enables the tag to operate
independently of the reader. Semi-Passive TAGs with double loop antennas ar-
ranged as a shifted gate system influence by electromagnetic interferences which
effect there stability behavior. Semi-Passive RFID TAGs system with a battery is
like a Reader unit and aimed to improve the communication performance by using
double loop antennas in walk-through gate arrangement in various TAGs orienta-
tions of the RFID system operating mainly in the LF band. The below figure
describes the double loop antennas as a shifted gate in x-direction [8] (Fig. 1.19).
The antenna gate is shifted to avoid cancellation of magnetic fields between two
TAGs, and to improve the magnetic-field distribution. The RFID system at Low
Frequency (LF) band has been widely adopted. The RFID tags for this application
have usually installed in applications such that the orientation of tag id difficult to
fix for transferring data with RFID reader. Most of the LF-RFID reader antennas are
rectangular or circular loops, but these antennas cannot generate sufficient field
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 45
d1
strengths in some locations and/or tag antenna orientations. The double loop
antennas arranged as a shifted gate improves magnetic-field distribution in a region
of interest suitable for communication with various tag orientations, and enhance
the communication distance [1]. The antenna gate is shifted to avoid cancellation of
magnetic fields between two gate antennas. The gate antenna consists of two sides
of rectangular loops with two types of excitations; i.e., in phase and 180° out of
phase. When two antennas are excited in phase, the directions of the currents
flowing in two loops are in the same direction, resulting in the cancellation of
magnetic fields in the x-direction in the middle region of the gate. When two
antennas are excited 180° out of phase, the direction of the currents flowing in two
antennas is in the opposite direction, resulting in the cancellation of magnetic fields
in the y-direction in the middle region of the gates. Thus, the gate antennas are
arranged as a shifted gate to maintain magnetic fields in the middle region. The
double loop antenna is employed due to the fact that this antenna consists of two
parallel loops (primary and secondary loops). The shape of the primary loop is
rectangular for generating the magnetic field in the y-direction. The secondary loop
is always within the primary loop, and is optimized such that the magnetic fields in
x- and z-directions are strongly generated. D is the separation distance between gate
antennas, and d1 is the shifted distance in the x-direction. Due to electromagnetic
interferences there are differences in time delays with respect to gate antenna’s first
and second loop voltages and voltages derivatives. The delayed voltages are
Vi1(t − s1) and Vi2(t − s2) respectively (s1 6¼ s2) and delayed voltages derivatives
are dVi1(t − D1)/dt, dVi2(t − D2)/dt respectively ðD1 6¼ D2 ; s1 0; s2 0;
D1 ; D2 0Þ. The Semi-Passive RFID TAG with double loop antennas equivalent
circuit can represent as a delayed differential equations which depending on vari-
able parameters and delays. Our Semi-Passive RFID TAG system delay differential
46 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
and delay different model can be analytically by using delay differential equations
in dynamically. The need of the incorporation of a time delay is often of the
existence of any stage structure. It is often difficult to analytically study models with
delay dependent parameters, even if only a single discrete delay is present. There
are practical guidelines that combine graphical information with analytical work to
effectively study the local stability of models involving delay dependent parame-
ters. The stability of a given steady state is simply determined by the graphs of
some function of s1, s2 which can be expressed, explicitly and thus can be easily
depicted by Matlab and other popular software. We need only look at one such
function and locate the zeros. This function often has only two zeros, providing
thresholds for stability switches. As time delay increases, stability changes from
stable to unstable to stable. We emphasize the local stability aspects of some models
with delay dependent parameters. Additionally, there is a general geometric crite-
rion that, theoretically speaking, can be applied to models with many delays, or
even distributed delays. The simplest case of a first order characteristic equation,
providing more user friendly geometric and analytic criteria for stability switches.
The analytical criteria provided for the first and second order cases can be used to
obtain some insightful analytical statements and can be helpful for conducting
simulations [5, 6]. Semi-Passive RFID TAG with double loop antenna can be
represented as a two inductors in series (L11 and L12 for the first double loop gate
antenna) with parasitic resistance rP1. The double loop antennas in series are con-
nected in parallel to Semi-Passive RFID TAG. The Equivalent Circuit of
Semi-Passive RFID TAG is Capacitor (C1) and Resistor (R1) in parallel with
voltage generator Vs1(t) and parasitic resistance rS1. In case we have Passive RFID
TAG switch S1 is OFF otherwise is ON (Reader/Active RFID system) and long
distance is achievable. The second double loop gate antenna is defined as two
inductors in series L21 and L22 with series parasitic resistor rP2. Vs2(t) and parasitic
resistance rS2 are belong to the second gate antenna system with another
Semi-Passive RFID TAG [1].
L11 and L12 are mostly formed by traces on planar PCB. 2 Lm element represents
the mutual inductance between L11 and L12. We consider that the double loop
antennas parameter values (La1, La2, Lb1, Lb2, a1, a2) are the same in the first and second
gates. Since two inductors (L11, L12) are in series and there is a mutual inductance
between L11 and L12, the total antenna inductance LT: LT = L11 + L12 + 2 Lm and
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lm ¼ K L11 L12 . Lm is the mutual inductance between L11 and L12. K is the
coupling coefficient of two inductors 0
K
1. We start with the case of passive
RFID TAG which switch S1 is OFF. I(t) is the current that flow through a double loop
antenna. V11 and V12 are the voltages on L11 and L12 respectively. Vm is the voltage on
double loop antenna mutual inductance element.
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 47
dI dI dI
V11 ¼ L11 ; V12 ¼ L12 ; VCD ¼ I rp1 ; Vm ¼ 2 Lm ;
dt dt dt
dVC1
VAB ¼ VR1 ¼ VC1 ¼ V11 þ V12 þ VCD þ Vm ; IC1 ¼ C1
dt
dVC1
VAB ¼ VR1 ¼ VC1 ¼ V11 þ V12 þ VCD þ Vm ; IC1 ¼ C1 ;
dt
dVC1 VC
IC1 þ IR1 þ I ¼ 0 ) C1 þ 1 þ I ¼ 0; L11 6¼ L12
dt R1
d 2 V11 dV11
g1 þ g2 þ V11 g3 ¼ 0
dt2 dt rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
L12 L12
g1 ¼ C1 ð1 þ þ2 K Þ;
L11 L11
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
C1 rp1 1 L12 L12
g2 ¼ þ ð1 þ þ2 K Þ;
L11 R1 L11 L11
C1 rp1 1 g1 1 rp1
g2 ¼ þ ;g ¼ ð1 þ Þ
L11 R1 C1 3 L11 R1
g1 ¼ g1 ðC1 ; L12 ; L11 ; KÞ; g2 ¼ g2 ðC1 ; rp1 ; L12 ; L11 ; K; R1 Þ;
0
dV11 dV11
0 d 2 V11
g3 ¼ g3 ðL11 ; rp1 ; R1 Þ; V11 ¼ ; ¼
dt dt dt2
0
dV11 0 g g dV 11 0
¼ V11 2 V11 3 ; ¼ V11 :
dt g1 g1 dt
48 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
In the same manner we find our V12 differential equation. We get the following
differential equation respect to V12(t) variable, n1 ; n2 ; n3 are global parameters.
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d 2 V12 dV12 L11 L11
n1 þ n2 þ V12 n3 ¼ 0; n1 ¼ C1 ð1 þ þ2 K Þ;
dt2 dt L12 L12
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
C1 rp1 1 L11 L11 1 rp1
n2 ¼ þ ð1 þ þ2 K Þ; n3 ¼ ð1 þ Þ
L12 R1 L12 L12 L12 R1
0
C1 rp1 1 n1 0 dV12 dV12 d 2 V12
n2 ¼ þ ;V ¼ ; ¼ ;
L12 R1 C1 12 dt dt dt2
n1 ¼ n1 ðC1 ; L12 ; L11 ; KÞ; n2 ¼ n2 ðC1 ; rp1 ; L12 ; L11 ; K; R1 Þ
0
dV12 0 n n dV12 0
n3 ¼ n3 ðL12 ; rp1 ; R1 Þ; ¼ V12 2 V12 3 ; ¼ V12 :
dt n1 n1 dt
Summary: We get our RFID double loop antennas system’s four differential
equations.
0 0
dV11 0 g g dV11 0 dV12 0 n n dV12 0
¼ V11 2 V11 3 ; ¼ V11 ; ¼ V12 2 V12 3 ; ¼ V12
dt g1 g1 dt dt n1 n1 dt
0 dV 0 1
11 0 1 0 V0 1
B dt C C11 . . . C14 11
B dV11 C B C BV C g2 g3
B dt C B .. .. .. C B 11 C
B dV 0 C ¼ @ . . . AB C; C11 ¼ ; C12 ¼ ;
B 12 C @ V12 A
0 g1 g1
@ dt A
dV
C41 C44 V
12 12
dt
n2 n
C33 ¼ ; C34 ¼ 3 ; C21 ¼ C43 ¼ 1
n1 n1
C13 ¼ C14 ¼ C22 ¼ C23 ¼ C24 ¼ C31 ¼ C32 ¼ C41 ¼ C42 ¼ C44 ¼ 0
The RFID double loop antennas system’s primary and secondary loops are
composed of a thin wire or a thin plate element (Fig. 1.20). Units are all in cm, and
a1, a2 are radiuses of the primary and secondary wires in cm. There inductances can
be calculated by the following formulas (Fig. 1.21):
2 A1 2 A1
L11 ¼ 4 fLb1 ln½ þ La1 ln½ þ 2 ½a1 þ lc1
a1 ðLb1 þ lc1 Þ a1 ðLb1 þ lc1 Þ
ðLa1 þ Lb1 Þg
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 49
2a1
2a2 Lb2 Lb1
Semi-Active
RFID / Reader
2 A2 2 A2
L12 ¼ 4 fLb2 ln½ þ La2 ln½ þ 2 ½a2 þ lc2
a2 ðLb2 þ lc2 Þ a2 ðLb2 þ lc2 Þ
ðLa2 þ Lb2 Þg
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lc1 ¼ L2a1 þ L2b1 ; A1 ¼ La1 Lb1 ; lc2 ¼ L2a2 þ L2b2 ; A2 ¼ La2 Lb2
To find equilibrium points (fixed points) of the RFID shifted gate system is by
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of RFID shifted gate system consists in adding to coordinate
0 0
½V11 V11 V12 V12 arbitrarily small increments of exponential form½v011 v11 v012 v12 ekt ,
0 0
and retaining the first order terms in V11 V11 V12 V12 . The system of four homogeneous
equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues k. The
polynomial characteristic equations accept by set the below voltages and voltages
derivative respect to time into two RFID shifted gate system equations.
RFID shifted gate system fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of
exponential form ½v011 v11 v012 v12 ekt are: i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second
fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v011 ekt ; V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v11 ekt
0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v012 ekt ; V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v12 ekt
0 0
We choose the above expressions for our V11 ðtÞ; V11 ðtÞ and V12 ðtÞ; V12 ðtÞ as
0 0
small displacement ½v11 v11 v12 v12 from the system fixed points in time t = 0.
0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v011 ; V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v11
0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v012 ; V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v12
k<0 k>0
0 0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
t=0 V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v011 0
V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v011
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v11 V11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V11 þ v11
0 0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v012 0
V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v012
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v12 V12 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V12 þ v12
0 0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
t>0 V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v011 ejkjt 0
V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v011 ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v11 ejkjt V11 ðtÞ ¼ V11 þ v11 ejkjt
0 0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v012 ejkjt 0
V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v012 ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v12 ejkjt V12 ðtÞ ¼ V12 þ v12 ejkjt
(continued)
52 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
(continued)
k<0 k>0
0ðiÞ 0
t>0 0
V11 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ V11 V11 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ v011 ejkjt
t!∞
V11 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
ðiÞ
V11 V11 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ v11 ejkjt
0
0
V12 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
0ðiÞ
V12 V12 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ v012 ejkjt
V12 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
ðiÞ
V12 V12 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ v11 ejkjt
The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for RFID
shifted gate system voltages and voltages derivatives respect to time are
0 0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
dV11 ðtÞ V 0 ðt þ DtÞ V11 0
ðtÞ V þ v011 ekðt þ DtÞ ½V11 þ v011 ekt
¼ lim 11 ¼ lim 11
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
v011 ekt ½ekDt 1
¼ lim ! ekDt 1 þ k Dtk v011 ekt
Dt!0 Dt
dV11 ðtÞ dV12 ðtÞ
¼ k v11 ekt ; ¼ k v12 ekt ;
dt dt
0
dV12 ðtÞ dV 0 ðt D1 Þ
¼ k v012 ekt ; 11 ¼ k v011 ekt ekD1
dt dt
0
dV11 ðt D1 Þ dV11 ðt s1 Þ
¼ k v011 ekt ekD1 ; ¼ k v11 ekt eks1
dt dt
dV12 ðt s2 Þ dV 0 ðt D2 Þ
¼ k v12 ekt eks2 ; 12 ¼ k v012 ekt ekD2
dt dt
First, we take the RFID shifted gate voltages V11, V12 differential equations:
0 dV12 0 0 0
dV11
dt ¼ V11 ; dt ¼ V12 and adding coordinates ½V11 V11 V12 V12 arbitrarily small
0 0 kt
increments of exponential terms ½v11 v11 v12 v12 e and retaining the first order
terms in v011 v11 v012 v12 .
0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
k v11 ekt ¼ V11 þ v011 ekt ; V11 ¼ 0; k v11 ¼ v011 ) k v11 þ v011 ¼ 0
0ðiÞ 0ðiÞ
k v12 ekt ¼ V12 þ v012 ekt ; V12 ¼ 0; k v12 ¼ v012 ) k v12 þ v012 ¼ 0
0 0
Second, we take the RFID shifted gate’s voltages derivative V11 ; V12 differential
equations:
0
dV11 0 dV 0 0
¼ C11 V11 þ C12 V11 ; 12 ¼ C33 V12 þ C34 V12
dt dt
0 0
And adding coordinates ½V11 V11 V12 V12 arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential terms ½v11 v11 v12 v12 e and retaining the first order terms in v011 v11 v012 v12 .
0 0 kt
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 53
0 0
0 ðiÞ 0 ðiÞ ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ
k v11 ekt ¼ C11 ½V11 þ v11 ekt þ C12 ½V11 þ v11 ekt ; V11 ¼ 0 ; V11 ¼0
0 0 0 0
k v11 ¼ C11 v11 þ C12 v11 ) k v11 þ C11 v11 þ C12 v11 ¼ 0
0 0
0 ðiÞ 0 ðiÞ ði¼0Þ ði¼0Þ
k v12 ekt ¼ C33 ½V12 þ v12 ekt þ C34 ½V12 þ v12 ekt ; V12 ¼ 0 ; V12 ¼0
0 0 0 0
k v12 ¼ C33 v12 þ C34 v12 ) k v12 þ C33 v12 þ C34 v12 ¼ 0
0
We can summery our eigenvalues equations: ðk þ C11 Þ v11 þ C12 v11 ¼ 0
0 0 0
v11 k v11 ¼ 0 ; ( k þ C33 Þ v12 þ C34 v12 ¼ 0 ; v12 k v12 ¼ 0
0 0 1
0 1 v11
X11 ... X14 B C
B . B v11 C
B . .. .. C
C B C
@ . . . AB
B v0 C
C ¼ 0 ; X11 ¼ k þ C11 ; X12 ¼ C12 ; X13 ¼ 0 ; X14 ¼ 0
@ 12 A
X41 X44
v12
X21 ¼ 1 ; X22 ¼ k ; X23 ¼ 0 ; X24 ¼ 0 ; X31 ¼ 0 ; X32 ¼ 0 ; X33 ¼ k þ C33 ; X34 ¼ C34
Eigenvalues stability discussion: Our Semi-passive RFID tags with double loop
antenna system involving N variables ðN [ 2; N ¼ 4Þ, the characteristic equation is
of degree N ¼ 4 and must often be solved numerically. Expect in some particular
cases, such an equation has (N ¼ 4) distinct roots that can be real or complex.
These values are the eigenvalues of the 4 4 Jacobian matrix (A). The general rule
54 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
is that the Steady State (SS) is stable if there is no eigenvalue with positive real
part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is positive for the steady state to be unstable.
0 0
Our 4-variables (V11 ; V11 ; V12 ; V12 ) system has four eigenvalues. The type of
behavior can be characterized as a function of the position of these eigenvalues in
the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be distinguished: (1) the four
eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), (2) the four eigenvalues are
real, three of them are negative (unstable steady state), (3) and (4) two eigenvalues
are complex conjugates with a negative real part and the other eigenvalues are real
negative (stable steady state), two cases can be distinguished depending on the
relative value of the real part of the complex eigenvalues and of the real one,
(5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and other
eigenvalues real are positive (unstable steady state) [2–4].
We define
0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V11 ðt D1 Þ ¼ V11 þ v011 ekðtD1 Þ ; V11 ðt s1 Þ ¼ V11 þ v11 ekðts1 Þ
0 0ðiÞ ðiÞ
V12 ðt D2 Þ ¼ V12 þ v012 ekðtD2 Þ ; V12 ðt s2 Þ ¼ V12 þ v12 ekðts2 Þ
k ekt v011 ¼ C11 ekðtD1 Þ v011 þ C12 ekðts1 Þ v11 ; k ekt v11 ¼ ekðtD1 Þ v011
k ekt v012 ¼ C33 ekðtD2 Þ v012 þ C34 ekðts2 Þ v12 ; k ekt v12 ¼ ekðtD2 Þ v012
P
2 P
2
k½ si þ Dj
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k þ C12 C34 e
4 i¼1 j¼1
P
2 P
2
k½s2 þ Dj k½s1 þ Dj
þ k fC11 C34 e j¼1
þ C33 C12 e j¼1
g
P
2
k Dj
kðD2 þ s2 Þ kðD1 þ s1 Þ
þ k fC34 e
2
C12 e þ C11 C33 e j¼1
g
k3 fC33 ekD2 þ C11 ekD1 g
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ k þ P2 ðsÞ k þ P3 ðsÞ k
k 2 3
k¼0
0 0
The homogeneous system for V11 V11 V12 V12 leads to a characteristic equation
for the eigenvalue k having the form PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼
P4 P
2
aj k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj k j
j¼0 j¼0
And the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk Þ; cj ðqi ; qk Þg 2 R depend on qi ; qk , but not on s.
qi ; qk are any two shifted gate system’s parameters, other parameters keep as a
constant. a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ C11 C34 ; a2 ¼ C11 C33 C34 ; a3 ¼ ðC33 þ C11 Þ; a4 ¼ 1
c0 ¼ C12 C34 ; c1 ¼ C33 C12 ; c2 ¼ C12 . Unless strictly necessary, the designa-
tion of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj.
The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their argu-
ments, and direct substitution shows that a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e.
k = 0 is not a of PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0. Furthermore, P(k), Q(k) are analytic
functions of k, for which the following requirements of the analysis [BK] can also
be verified in the present case:
(a) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R, then Pði xÞ þ Qði xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 Has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of F(x) = 0 is continuous and differentiable re-
spect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðkÞ. It can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is, for any real number x;
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0;
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ i x C11 C34 þ i x3 ðC33 þ C11 Þ x2 ðC11 C33 C34 Þ þ x4
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ i x C33 C12 þ C12 C34 þ x2 C12
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ C12 C34 þ x2 ½C12 C11 C33 þ C34 þ x4
þ i x ½C33 C12 þ C11 C34 þ i x3 ½C33 þ C11 6¼ 0
jPði x; sÞj2 ¼ x2 C211 C234 þ x4 f2 C11 C34 ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ ðC11 C33 C34 Þ2 g
þ x6 fðC33 þ C11 Þ2 2 ðC11 C33 C34 Þg þ x8
jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ C212 C234 þ x2 C212 ð2 C34 þ C233 Þ þ x4 C212
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ C212 C234 þ x2 fC211 C234 C212 ð2 C34 þ C233 Þg
þ x4 f2 C11 C34 ðC33 þ C11 Þ þ ðC11 C33 C34 Þ2 C212 g
þ x6 fðC33 þ C11 Þ2 2 ðC11 C33 C34 Þg þ x8
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 57
P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies N2k x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x2 ðC11 C33 C34 Þ þ x4
Hence
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
P
4
Which jointly with Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 ) N2k x2k ¼ 0 that is continuous and
k¼0
differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use theorem 1.2. This proves the
theorem 1.3. Remark: RFID shifted gate system parameters are independent of the
delay parameter s.
Second, we discuss RFID shifted gate system fourth order characteristic equation
for s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s & D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0. The second case we analyze is when there is a
58 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
delay in RFID gate’s primary and secondary loop antenna voltages (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s)
and no delay in the gate’s primary and secondary loop antennas voltages derivatives
[5, 6]. The general characteristic equation D(k, s) is ad follow:
1 2 2
eks 1 k s þ k s :
2
Dðk; sÞ ¼ k4 k3 ½C33 þ C11 þ k2 C11 C33
þ fC12 C34 þ k ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s
1
þ k2 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 g eks
2
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 2; n [ m:
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ k þ P2 ðsÞ k
k 2
k¼0
P
m
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ k þ
k¼0
q2 ðsÞ k2
X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ k þ q2 ðsÞ k2
k¼0
Xm
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ C12 C34 þ k ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s
k¼0
1
þ k2 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 ; q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12 C34
2
1
q1 ðsÞ ¼ C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s; q2 ðsÞ ¼ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12
2
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 59
0 0
The homogeneous system for V11 V11 V12 V12 leads to a characteristic equation
for the eigenvalue k having the form
X
4 X
2
Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ aj k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj k j
j¼0 j¼0
And the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on qi ; qk and delay
s. qi ; qk are any two shifted gate system’s parameters, other parameters keep as a
constant.
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ C11 C33 ; a3 ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; a4 ¼ 1
c0 ¼ C12 C34 ; c1 ¼ C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s;
1
c2 ¼ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12
2
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e. k = 0 is not a of Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ eks ¼ 0.
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That is,
for any real number x:
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0; pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ
¼ x4 þ i x3 ðC33 þ C11 Þ x2 C11 C33
jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ C212 C234 þ x2 f½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s2
1
2 C12 C34 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 g
2
1
þ x4 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 2
2
60 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
We need to find the expression for Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2
P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies N2k x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x4 x2 C11 C33
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x4 x2 C11 C33
P1 ði x; sÞ ¼ x3 ðC33 þ C11 Þ
1
QR ði x; sÞ ¼ C12 C34 x2 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 ;
2
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ x ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s
Hence
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 61
1
fx4 x2 C11 C33 g fC12 C34 x2 ½ C12 C34 s2
2
C34 C12 g þ x4 ðC33 þ C11 Þ ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33
C12 C34 s
cos hðsÞ ¼
C212 C234 þ x2 f½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s2
1
2 C12 C34 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 g
2
1
þ x4 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 2
2
The Maclaurin series is a Taylor series expansion of eks ; e2ks ; e3ks func-
tions about zero (0). We get the following general characteristic equation D(k, s)
under Taylor series approximation:
eks 1 k s; ek2s 1 k 2 s
ek3s 1 k 3 s
.
62 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ k þ P2 ðsÞ k þ P3 ðsÞ k
k 2 3
k¼0
þ P4 ðsÞ k4 ¼ k4
P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0 ; P2 ðsÞ ¼ 0 ; P3 ðsÞ ¼ 0 ; P4 ðsÞ ¼ 1
X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ k þ q2 ðsÞ k2 þ q3 ðsÞ k3
k¼0
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ C12 C34 þ k ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ
þ k2 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ
þ k3 ð½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11 Þ
q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12 C34 ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD ;
q2 ðsÞ ¼ C11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD
q3 ðsÞ ¼ ½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11
0 0
A homogeneous system for V11 V11 V12 V12 leads to a characteristic equation for
P4
the eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ aj
j¼0
P
3
k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj k j and the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on
j¼0
qi ; qk and delay s. qi ; qk are any two shifted gate system’s parameters, other
parameters kept as a constant.
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ 0; a3 ¼ 0; a4 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ C12 C34 ;
c1 ¼ C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD
c0 ¼ C12 C34 ; c1 ¼ C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD ;
c2 ¼ C11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD
c3 ¼ ½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11 :
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 63
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e.
k = 0 is not a Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ eks ¼ 0. We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and
Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That is, for any real number x:
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0
pn ðk ¼ ix; sÞ ¼ x4 ; Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼
C12 C34 x2 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ
þ i x ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ
i x3 ð½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11 Þ
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼
C12 C34 x2 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ
þ x4 þ i x ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ
i x3 ð½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11 Þ 6¼ 0; jPði x; sÞj2 ¼ x8
jQm ðk ¼ i x; sÞj2 ¼ C212 C234 þ x2 fðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ2
2 C12 C34 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þg
þ x4 fðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ2
2 ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ ð½C34 C11 C33
þ C12 sD C33 C11 Þg
þ x6 ð½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11 Þ2
We need to find the expression for Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 x6 ð½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11 Þ2
x4 fðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ2
2 ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ ð½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11 Þg
x2 fðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ2
2 C12 C34 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þg C212 C234
64 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies N2k x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. Furthermore
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x4 ; PI ði x; sÞ ¼ 0
QR ði x; sÞ ¼ C12 C34 x2 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ x fðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ
x2 ð½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11 Þg
Hence
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
x4 fC12 C34 x2 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þg
cos hðsÞ ¼
C212 C234 þ x2 fðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ2
2 C12 C34 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þg
þ x4 fðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ2 2 ðC11 C34
þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ ð½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11 Þg
þ x6 ð½C34 C11 C33 þ C12 sD C33 C11 Þ2
faj ðC1 ; R1 ; gate antenna parametrsÞ and cj ðC1 ; R1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs Þg 2 R
depend on RFID shifted gate system’s C1, R1,s values and antenna parameters.
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ C11 C33 ; a3 ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; a4 ¼ 1
c0 ¼ C12 C34 ; c1 ¼ C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s;
1
c2 ¼ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12
2
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments
ðR1 ; C1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs) will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj.
The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their argu-
ments, and direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; C12 C34 6¼ 0.
r
g3 n3 ð1 þ Rp11 Þ2
1
L11 L12
¼ rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 6¼ 0
g1 n1 L12 L12 L11
C12 ð1 þ þ2 K Þ ð1 þ
L11 L11 L12
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
L11
þ2 K Þ
L12
8 C1 ; gate antenna parameters 2 R þ
i.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root of the characteristic equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; QðkÞ are
analytic functions of k for which the following requirements of the analysis (see
Kuang 1993, Sect. 3.4) can also be verified in the present case [5, 6].
(a) If k ¼ i x, x 2 R then Pði xÞ þ Qði xÞ 6¼ 0, i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
ðR1 ; C1 ; antenna parametrs) domain of interest.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
Indeed, in the limit.
QðkÞ fC12 C34 þ k ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s þ k2 ½12 C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 g
j j¼j j
PðkÞ k4 k3 ½C33 þ C11 þ k2 C11 C33
@Rek
^1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; R1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs ¼ const
@C1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðR1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; s; gate antenna parametrs ¼ const
@R1 k¼ix
@Rek @Rek
^1 ðL11 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; s ¼ const; ^1 ðL12 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; s ¼ const
@L11 k¼ix @L12 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; gate antenna parametrs ¼ const; where x 2 R þ :
@s k¼ix
P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies N2k x2k ¼ 0 When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i
k¼0
PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼ i x Into RFID Gate sys-
tem’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:
68 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin x s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos x s ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ s ¼ hðsÞ þ n 2 p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by
hðsÞ þ n 2 p
sn ðsÞ ¼ ; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I
xðsÞ
Where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . .: etc., Substituting k ¼ i x, and bearing i
Pði xÞ ¼ Pði xÞ, Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ then i Pk ði xÞ ¼ Px ði xÞ and
i Qk ði xÞ ¼ Qx ði xÞ. That on the surface jPði xÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 , one obtains
P ¼ PR þ i PI ; Q ¼ QR þ i QI ; Px ¼ PRx þ i PIx
Qx ¼ QRx þ i QIx ; Px ¼ PRx þ i PIx
Qx ¼ QRx þ i QIx ; P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I
When (x) can be any RFID Gate parameters R1, C1, And time delay s etc. Where
for convenience, we have dropped the arguments ði x; xÞ, and where
We define U and V:
U ¼ ðPR PIx PI PRx Þ ðQR QIx QI QRx Þ;
V ¼ ðPR PIx PI PRx Þ ðQR QIx QI QRx Þ
1
Fs ¼ 2 x2 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 s x2 ð C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 Þ
2
PR PIx ¼ 3 x4 ðx2 C11 C33 Þ ðC33 þ C11 Þ;
PI PRx ¼ 2 x4 ðC33 þ C11 Þ ð2 x2 C11 C33 Þ
1
QR QIx ¼ ½C12 C34 x2 ð C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 Þ
2
½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s
QI QRx ¼ 2 x2 ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 sÞ
1
ð C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 Þ
2
V ¼ ðPR PIs PI PRs Þ ðQR QIs QI QRs Þ;
PR PIs ¼ 0; PI PRs ¼ 0
1
QR QIs ¼ x C12 C34 ½C12 C34 x2 ð C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 Þ;
2
QI QRs ¼ x3 C12 C34 s ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s
Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0:
@x @x Fs @Rek
Fx þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) ¼ ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s @s Fx @s k¼ix
2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx @x Fs
^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g; ¼ xs ¼
Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj @s
2 Fx
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@s k¼ix
@x U @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g signfs þxþ g
@s jPj2
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; gate antenna parametrs ¼ const where x 2 R þ :
@s k¼ix
1.4 Semi-Passive RFID Tags with Double Loop Antennas Arranged … 71
For our stability switching analysis, we choose typical RFID shifted gate parameters
values: L11 = 4.5 mH, L12 = 2.5 mH, C1 = 23 pF, R1 = 100 kX = 105, rp1 = 100 X,
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
K = 0.6, 2Lm = 0.004 (2 Lm ¼ 2 K L11 L12 ). g1 ¼ 56:22 1012
Then we get the expression Fðx; sÞ for a typical RFID shifted gate parameters
values.
@Rek 2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g;
@s Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
@Rek 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally, when all RFID double gate system’s
parameters are known and the stability switch due to various time delay values s is
described in the following expression:
72 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
Remark: we know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies its roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which are xi complex or imaginary
numbered, then unable to analyze stability [5, 6].
Semi-passive RFID Tags with the double loop antennas environment is char-
acterized by electromagnetic interferences which can influence the shifted gate
system stability in time. There are four main RFID double loop antenna variables
which are affected by electromagnetic interferences, first and second loop antenna
voltages and voltages derivatives respectively. Each loop antennas voltage variable
under electromagnetic interferences are characterized by time delay respectively.
The two time delays are not the same, but can be categorized to some sub cases due
to interferences behavior. The first case we analyze is when there is a delay in RFID
first gate’s primary loop antenna voltage and no delay in secondary loop antenna
voltage. The second case we analyze is when there is a delay in RFID gate’s
primary and secondary loop antenna voltages (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s) and no delay in the
gate’s primary and secondary loop antennas voltages derivatives [5, 6]. The third
case we analyze is when there is a delay in RFID gate’s primary and secondary loop
antenna voltages (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD ) and delay in the gate’s primary and
secondary loop antennas voltages derivatives [4, 5]. For simplicity of our analysis
we consider in the third case all delays are the same (there is a difference but it is
neglected in our analysis). In each case we derive the related characteristic equation.
The characteristic equation is dependent on double loop antennas overall parame-
ters and interferences time delay. Upon mathematics manipulation and [BK] the-
orems and definitions we derive the expression which gives us a clear picture on
double loop antennas stability map. The stability map gives all possible options for
stability segments, each segment belongs to different time delay value segment.
Double loop antennas arranged as a shifted gate’s stability analysis can be influ-
enced either by system overall parameter values [5, 6].
The RFID market is growing and several cost, size and DC power constraints in the
TAG itself have forced designers to abandon super heterodyne receivers for older
and simpler crystal video receiver. Consisting of a simple detector circuit and a
printed antenna, this receiver can face a stability issues due to delay elements in
time. The Schottky diode detector demodulates the signal and sends the data on to
the digital circuit of the TAG; this is the so-called “wake up” signal. A simple
RFID TAG receiver block diagram includes input antenna signal with series
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 73
resistance, inductor (choke), Schottky diode, and output capacitor. At a small signal
(RF Input) levels, the Schottky diode can be represented by a linear equivalent
circuit. Due to Schottky parasitic delayed in time, there is a stability issue by
analyzing the detector operation. We include two parasitic delay elements in the
Schottky equivalent circuit. We define s1, s2 as delays in time, respectively, for the
Schottky equivalent circuit. We consider first those two delays in time are not equal
s1 6¼ s2 then another three cases s1 = s & s2 = 0, s2 = s & s1 = 0, s1 = s2 = s. The
RFID receiver detector delayed in time equivalent circuit can represent as a delayed
differential equations which depending on variable parameters and delays. The
investigation of our RFID receiver detector system, differential equation based on
bifurcation theory [1], the study of possible changes in the structure of the orbits of
a delayed differential equation depending on variable parameters. We first illustrate
certain observations and analyze local bifurcations of an appropriate arbitrary scalar
delayed differential equation [2]. RFID receiver detector stability analysis is done
under different time delays respect to currents and currents derivative. All of that for
optimization of RFID receiver detector equivalent circuit parameter analysis to get
the best performance. RFID system, the reader or interrogator sends a modulated
RF signal which is received by the TAG. The Schottky diode detector demodulates
the signal and sends the data on to the digital circuits of the TAG. The reader stops
sending modulated data and illuminates the TAG with continuous wave (CW) or
un-modulated signal. The TAG’s FSK encoder and switch driver switch the load
placed on the TAG’s antenna from one state to another, causing the radar cross
section of the TAG to be changed. The weak signal reflected from the TAG is
modulated; this signal is then detected by the reader’s receiver. In this way the
reader and TAG can communicate using RF generated only in the reader. The key
performance parameter for RFID TAG detector diode is operating in the square law
region in voltage sensitivity. For incoming RF small signal from the RFID reader to
the TAG, we can use Schottky diode which represented by a linear equivalent
circuit. Rj is the junction resistance (Rv or video resistance) of the diode, where RF
power is converted into video voltage output. For maximum output, all the
incoming RF voltages should ideally appear across Rj. Cj is the junction capaci-
tance of the diode chip itself. It is a parasitic element which shorts out the junction
resistance, shunting the RF energy to the series resistance Rs. Rs is a parasitic
resistance representing losses in the diode’s bond wire, the bulk silicon at the base
of the chip and other loss mechanisms. The RF voltage appearing across Rs results
in power lost as heat. Lp and Cp are package parasitic inductance and capacitance,
respectively. Unlike the two chips parasitic, they can easily be tuned out with an
external impedance matching network. The package parasitic inductance Lp has a
parasitic delay element in time (s1). The resistance losses in the diode’s bond wire
have a parasitic delay element in time (s2). V(t) represents the RFID tag antenna
voltage in time, the incoming RF small signal from the RFID reader. We consider
ideal delay lines (TAU1, TAU2), Vs1 ! e1 Vs1 ! e2 ; e1 ; e2 e [ 0 [85]
(Fig. 1.22).
74 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
VðtÞ VA dIL
¼ IRin ; IRin ¼ IL1 þ ILP ; Vs1 ! e1 ; Vs1 ! e2 ; e1 ; e2 e [ 0; VA VB ¼ LP P
Rin dt
VB VC dIL1 dðVB VD Þ VC VD
ILP ¼ ICP þ IRS ; IRS ¼ ; VA ¼ L1 ; ICP ¼ CP ; IRj ¼
RS dt dt Rj
dðVC VD Þ dVD
ICj ¼ Cj ; IRS ¼ IRj þ ICj ; IC1 ¼ C1 ; IC1 ¼ ICP þ IRj þ ICj
dt dt
dVD IC1 dðVC VD Þ dVC dVD dVC dVD
¼ ) ICj ¼ Cj ¼ Cj ½ ) ICj ¼ Cj ½
dt C1 dt dt dt dt dt
dðVB VD Þ dVB dVD dVB IC1 VðtÞ VA
ICP ¼ CP ¼ CP ½ ¼ CP ½ ; ¼ IRin ¼ IL1 þ ILP
dt dt dt dt C1 Rin
dIRS
We define Y ¼ ILP ) dt ¼ RS1CP Y þ 1
RS Cj IRj IRS ðRS1CP þ RS Cj Þ
1
dIRS 1 1 1 1
Y ¼ I LP ) ¼ Yþ IRj IRS ð þ Þ
dt RS CP RS Cj RS CP RS Cj
VðtÞ L1 dIL1 VðtÞ
¼ I L1 þ I LP ) I L1 I LP
Rin Rin dt Rin
L1 dIL1 VðtÞ Rin Rin dIL
¼ ) I L1 I LP ¼ 1
Rin dt L1 L1 L1 dt
d 2 ILP dIL R2 CP
CP LP 2
CP Rin P þ ILP ½CP in 1
dt dt L1 C1
R2 CP Rin VðtÞ dVðtÞ
þ IRS þ CP in IL1 þ CP ¼0
L1 L1 dt
dX R2 CP
CP LP CP Rin X þ Y ½CP in 1
dt L1 C1
R2 CP Rin VðtÞ dVðtÞ
þ IRS þ CP in IL1 þ CP ¼0
L1 L1 dt
dX R2 CP
CP LP ¼ CP Rin X þ Y ½CP in 1
dt L1 C1
R2 CP Rin VðtÞ dVðtÞ
þ IRS þ CP in IL1 þ CP ¼0
L1 L1 dt
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 77
dX Rin R2 1 1
¼ X þ Y ½ in
dt LP L1 LP C1 LP CP LP
1 R2in Rin VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
þ IR S þ IL þ
CP LP L1 LP 1 L1 LP LP dt
We have five variables in our system: X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRS and we can represent our
system as the following set of differential equations matrix representation.
0 1
dX
0 1
B dt C Rin 0 1
B C 0 1 1
B dY C X B L1 LP C
B C B C B C
B dt C 0 1 B YC B C B LP C
B C N . . . N1n B C B 0 C B 0C
B dIL1 C B .11 .. .. C B C B C B C
B C¼@ . B C B 1 C VðtÞ þ B C dVðtÞ
B dt C . . . A B IL1 C þ B C B 0 C dt
B C B C B C B C
B dIR C Nm1 Nmn n¼m¼5 @ IRj A B L1 C B 0C
B j C B C @ A
B C IRS @ 0 A
B dt C 0
@ dI A 0
RS
dt
equivalent circuit, s1 for the current flow through Schottky diode’s package para-
sitic inductance (LP) and s2 for the current flow through Schottky diode’s parasitic
resistance (RS).
dI ðtÞ dI dI
And XðtÞ ¼ LdtP ; IL1 ðtÞ; IRj ðtÞ. We consider no delay effects on dY
dt ¼ dt ; dt .
LP RS
To find equilibrium points (fixed points) of the RFID tag detector, we define
lim Yðt s1 Þ ¼ YðtÞ; lim ILP ðt s1 Þ ¼ ILP ðtÞ; lim IRS ðt s2 Þ ¼ IRS ðtÞ
t!1 t!1 t!1
0 1
dX 1 0 R 1
0
B dY C 0
dt 1 X L Lin
B dt C N . . . N1n BY C B0 1 PC
B dIL1 C B .11 .. .. C B C B C
B dt C ¼ @ . B C B1 C A0 þ e
B dIR C . . . A B IL1 C þ B L1 C
B jC @ IR A @ 0 A
@ dt A Nm1 Nmn n¼m¼5 j
dIRS IRS 0
dt
dY dILP dIR
¼ ¼ 0; S ¼ 0 8 t s1 ; t s2
dt dt dt
9 ðt s1 Þ t; ðt s2 Þ t; t ! 1
Rin R2 1 1 1
X þ Y ½ in þ IR S
LP L1 LP C1 LP CP LP CP LP
R2in Rin VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
þ I þ ¼0
L 1 L P L1 L1 LP LP dt
Since X ¼ 0 then
R2in 1 1 1
Y ½ þ IR S
L1 LP C1 LP CP LP CP LP
R2in Rin VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
þ IL 1 þ ¼ 0:
L1 LP L1 LP LP dt
VðtÞ Rin Rin VðtÞ
I Y ¼ 0 ) Y ¼ IL 1 :
L1 L1 L1 L1 Rin
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 79
Then
1 VðtÞ 1 1 1 1
ð IL 1 Þ þ I IR S ð þ Þ ¼ 0
RS CP Rin RS Cj Rj RS CP Cj
VðtÞ R2 1 1 1
ð IL 1 Þ ½ in þ IR S
Rin L1 LP C1 LP CP LP CP LP
R2in Rin VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
þ I þ ¼0
L1 LP L1 L1 LP LP dt
1 1
I I ¼ 0
Cj Rj RS Cj Rj Rj
1 VðtÞ 1 1 1 1
ð IL 1 Þ þ I IR S ð þ Þ ¼ 0
RS CP Rin RS Cj Rj RS CP Cj
VðtÞ R2 1 1 1
ð IL 1 Þ ½ in þ IR S
Rin L1 LP C1 LP CP LP CP LP
R2in Rin VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
þ I þ ¼0
L1 LP L1 L1 LP LP dt
1 1
IR S I ¼ 0 ) IR j ¼ IR S
Cj Rj Cj Rj Rj
1 VðtÞ 1 1 1 1
ð IL 1 Þ þ IR S IR S ð þ Þ ¼ 0
RS CP Rin RS Cj RS CP Cj
VðtÞ R2 1 1 1
ð IL 1 Þ ½ in þ IR S
Rin L1 LP C1 LP CP LP CP LP
R2in R VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
I
in
þ þ ¼0
L1 LP L1 L1 LP LP dt
VðtÞ VðtÞ
IL 1 IR S ¼ 0 ) IR S ¼ IL 1
Rin Rin
1 1 1
IL 1 ð þ Þ þ IR S
C1 CP CP
1 R2 1 1 Rin dVðtÞ
þ VðtÞ f ½ in gþ ¼0
Rin L1 C1 CP L1 dt
80 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
1 R2in 1 1 Rin
X¼ ½
Rin L1 C1 CP L1
VðtÞ 1 1 1 dVðtÞ
IR S ¼ IL 1 ; IL 1 ð þ Þ þ IR S þ VðtÞ X þ ¼0
Rin C1 CP CP dt
1 1 VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
IL 1 ð þ Þþð IL 1 Þ þ VðtÞ X þ ¼0
C1 CP Rin CP dt
1 1 dVðtÞ
) IL 1 þ VðtÞ ½ þ X þ ¼0
C1 Rin CP dt
1 1 dVðtÞ
IL 1 þ VðtÞ ½ þ X þ ¼0
C1 Rin CP dt
1 dVðtÞ
) IL 1 ¼ C1 fVðtÞ ½ þ X þ g
Rin CP dt
VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ
IR S ¼ þ C1 fVðtÞ ½ þ X þ g
Rin Rin CP dt
1 1 dVðtÞ
¼ VðtÞ f þ C1 ½ þ Xg þ C1
Rin Rin CP dt
We define:
1 1 dVðtÞ
X1 ¼ þ C1 ½ þ X; IR S ¼ VðtÞ X1 þ C1
Rin Rin CP dt
dVðtÞ
IR j ¼ IR S ) IR j ¼ VðtÞ X1 þ C1 ; X ¼ 0
dt
VðtÞ 1 1 dVðtÞ
Y ¼ IL 1 ¼ VðtÞ f þ C1 ½ þ Xg þ C1
Rin Rin Rin CP dt
Fixed point coordinates Fixed points expression VðtÞjA0 jf ðtÞj ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ A0
E ðX ; Y ; VðtÞ ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ dVðtÞ
¼ dfdtðtÞ ! e
dt jA0 jf ðtÞj
IL 1 ; IR j ; IR S Þ jf ðtÞj\1 & A0 jf ðtÞj
X 0 0
Y VðtÞ fR1in þ C1 ½Rin1CP þ Xg þ C1 dVðtÞ A0 fR1in þ C1 ½Rin1CP þ Xg
dt
IL 1 C1 fVðtÞ ½Rin1CP þ X þ dVðtÞ C1 A0 ½Rin1CP þ X
dt g
IR j VðtÞ X1 þ C1 dVðtÞ A 0 X1
dt
IR S VðtÞ fR1in þ C1 ½Rin1CP þ Xg þ C1 dVðtÞ A0 fR1in þ C1 ½Rin1CP þ Xg
dt
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 81
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the RFID tag detector system consists in adding to coordinate
½X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRs arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs
ekt and retaining the first order terms in X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRs . The system of five ho-
mogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigen-
values. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set the below currents
and currents derivative with respect to time into RFID tag detector system equa-
tions. RFID tag detector system fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of
exponential form ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second
fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.
We choose these expressions for ourselves XðtÞ; YðtÞ; IL1 ðtÞ and IRj ðtÞ; IRS ðtÞ as a
small displacement ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs from the RFID tag detector system fixed points
in time t = 0.
Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X ðjÞ þ x; Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y;
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ; IRj ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IRj þ iRj
ðjÞ
IRS ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IRS þ iRS
dXðtÞ Xðt þ DtÞ XðtÞ X ðjÞ þ x ekðt þ DtÞ ½X ðjÞ þ x ekt ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ lim ¼ lim ¼ ! k x ekt
dt Dt!1 Dt Dt!1 Dt
dYðtÞ Yðt þ DtÞ YðtÞ Y ðjÞ þ y ekðt þ DtÞ ½Y ðjÞ þ y ekt ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ lim ¼ lim ¼ ! k y ekt
dt Dt!1 Dt Dt!1 Dt
dIL1 ðtÞ dIRj ðtÞ dIRS ðtÞ dYðt s1 Þ
¼ k iL1 ekt ; ¼ k iRj ekt ; ¼ k iRS ekt ; ¼ k y ekt eks1
dt dt dt dt
dIRS ðt s2 Þ
¼ k iRS ekt eks2
dt
82 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
First, we take Schottky detector variable X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRs differential equations
and adding to coordinate ½X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRs arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential terms ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs ekt and retaining the first order terms in
x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs (VðtÞ ! e; dVðtÞ
dt ! e) then
E ðX ; Y ; IL 1 ; IR j ; IR S Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0; 0Þ;
ðj¼0Þ ðj¼0Þ ðj¼0Þ
X ðj¼0Þ ¼ 0; Y ðj¼0Þ ¼ 0; IL1 ¼ 0; IRj ¼ 0; IRS ¼ 0:
We can see that our fixed point is a saddle node. We define Yðt s1 Þ ¼
ðjÞ
Y þ y ekðts1 Þ and IRS ðt s2 Þ ¼ IRS þ iRS ekðts2 Þ . Then we get five delayed
ðjÞ
differential equations with respect to coordinates ½X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRs arbitrarily small
increments of exponential ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs ekt . We consider no delay effects on
dYðtÞ dIRS ðtÞ
dt and dt . We get the following equations:
k\0 k[0
ðjÞ
t=0 Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X þx Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X ðjÞ þ x
ðjÞ
Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y þy Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRj ðtÞ ¼ IRj þ iRj IRj ðtÞ ¼ IRj þ iRj
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRS ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IRS þ iRS IRS ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IRS þ iRS
t>0 XðtÞ ¼ X ðjÞ þ x ejkjt XðtÞ ¼ X ðjÞ þ x ejkjt
ðjÞ jkjt
YðtÞ ¼ Y þy e YðtÞ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ejkjt IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRj ðtÞ ¼ IRj þ iRj ejkjt IRj ðtÞ ¼ IRj þ iRj ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRS ðtÞ ¼ IRS þ iRS ejkjt IRS ðtÞ ¼ IRS þ iRS ejkjt
t > 0; t ! ∞ Xðt ! 1Þ ¼ X ðjÞ Xðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ ¼ x ejkjt
ðjÞ
Yðt ! 1Þ ¼ Y Yðt ! 1; kÞ ¼ y ejkjt
ðjÞ
IL1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ IL1 IL1 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ ¼ iL1 ejkjt
ðjÞ
IRj ðt ! 1Þ ¼ IRj IRj ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ ¼ iRj ejkjt
ðjÞ
IRS ðt ! 1Þ ¼ IRS IRS ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ ¼ iRS ejkjt
Rin R2 1 1
k x ekt ¼ ½X ðjÞ þ x ekt þ ½Y ðjÞ þ y ekðts1 Þ ½ in
LP L1 LP C1 LP CP LP
ðjÞ 1 R2in ðjÞ
þ ½IRS þ iRS ekðts2 Þ þ ½I þ iL1 ekt
CP LP L1 LP L1
Rin VðtÞ 1 dVðtÞ dVðtÞ
þ ; VðtÞ; !e
L1 LP LP dt dt
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 83
Rin ðjÞ R2 1 1
k x ekt ¼ X þ Y ðjÞ ½ in
LP L1 LP C1 LP CP LP
ðjÞ 1 R2in ðjÞ Rin
þ IRS þ I x ekt
CP LP L1 LP L1 LP
R2 1 1
þ y ½ in ekðts1 Þ
L1 LP C1 LP CP LP
1 R2in
þ iRS ekðts2 Þ þ iL ekt
CP LP L1 LP 1
At fixed point:
Rin ðjÞ R2 1 1 ðjÞ 1 R2in ðjÞ
X þ Y ðjÞ ½ in þ IRS þ I ¼0
LP L1 LP C1 LP CP LP CP LP L1 LP L1
Then
Rin R2 1 1
x ekt ½k þ þ y ½ in ekðts1 Þ
LP L1 LP C1 LP CP LP
1 R2in
þ iRS ekðts2 Þ þ iL ekt ¼ 0
CP LP L1 LP 1
dY
¼ X ) k y ekt ¼ X ðjÞ þ x ekt :
dt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point 1
Cj Rj IRS Cj1Rj IRj ¼ 0 then iRj ekt ½k þ Cj Rj þ
1
1 1 ðjÞ
k iRS ekt ¼ ½Y ðjÞ þ y ekðts1 Þ þ ½I þ iRj ekt
RS CP RS Cj Rj
ðjÞ 1 1 1
½IRS þ iRS ekðts2 Þ ð þ Þ
RS CP Cj
1 1 1 ðjÞ
k iRS ekt ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y ekðts1 Þ þ I
RS CP RS CP RS Cj Rj
1 ðjÞ 1 1 1
þ iRj ekt IRS ð þ Þ
RS Cj RS CP Cj
1 1 1
iRS ð þ Þ ekðts2 Þ
RS CP Cj
1 1 ðjÞ ðjÞ 1 1 1
k iRS ekt ¼ Y ðjÞ þ I IRS ð þ Þ
RS CP RS Cj Rj RS CP Cj
1 1
þy ekðts1 Þ þ iRj ekt
RS CP RS Cj
1 1 1
iRS ð þ Þ ekðts2 Þ
RS CP Cj
ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point 1
RS CP Y ðjÞ þ 1
RS Cj IRj IRS R1S ðC1P þ C1j Þ ¼ 0 then
1 1 1
iRS ekt ½k þ ð þ Þ eks2
RS CP Cj
1 1
þy ekðts1 Þ þ iRj ekt ¼ 0
RS CP RS Cj
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 85
Rin R2 1 1
x ½k þ þ y ½ in eks1
LP L1 LP C1 LP CP LP
R2in 1
þ iL þ iRS eks2 ¼ 0
L1 LP 1 CP LP
xky¼0
Rin ks1 Rin
y e i L1 ½ þ k ¼ 0
L1 L1
1 1
iRj ½k þ þ iRS eks2 ¼ 0
Cj Rj Cj Rj
1 1 1 1 1
y eks1 þ iRj iRS ½k þ ð þ Þ eks2 ¼ 0
RS CP RS Cj RS CP Cj
11 ¼ r1 k; 12 ¼ r2 eks1 ; 13 ¼ r3 ; 14 ¼ 0;
15 ¼ r4 eks2 ; 21 ¼ 1; 22 ¼ k; 23 ¼ 24 ¼ 25 ¼ 0
31 ¼ 0; 32 ¼ r5 eks1 ; 33 ¼ r5 k;
34 ¼ 0; 35 ¼ 0; 41 ¼ 42 ¼ 43 ¼ 0
44 ¼ r6 k; 45 ¼ r6 eks2 ; 51 ¼ 0;
52 ¼ r7 eks1 ; 53 ¼ 0; 54 ¼ r8 ; 55 ¼ r9 eks2 k
0 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 r5 k 0
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6 eks2 A ¼ 0; det@ 0 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A ¼ 0
0 r8 ðr9 eks2 kÞ 0 0 r8
First expression:
0 1
r5 k 0 0 !
B ks2 C ðr6 þ kÞ r6 eks2
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6 e A ¼ ðr5 kÞ det
r8 ðr9 eks2 kÞ
0 r8 ðr9 eks2 kÞ
¼ ðr5 kÞ fðr6 þ kÞ ðr9 eks2 kÞ r8 r6 eks2 g
¼ ðr5 kÞ fr6 r9 eks2 þ r6 k k r9 eks2 þ k2 r8 r6 eks2 g
¼ ðr5 kÞ fr6 k þ k2 ½r6 r9 þ r8 r6 þ k r9 eks2 g
0 1
r5 k 0 0
B C
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6 eks2 A
0 r8 ðr9 eks2 kÞ
!
ðr6 þ kÞ r6 eks2
¼ ðr5 kÞ det
r8 ðr9 eks2 kÞ
¼ ðr5 kÞ fðr6 þ kÞ ðr9 eks2 kÞ r8 r6 eks2 g
¼ ðr5 kÞ fr6 r9 eks2 þ r6 k k r9 eks2 þ k2 r8 r6 eks2 g
¼ ðr5 kÞ fr6 k þ k2 ½r6 r9 þ r8 r6 þ k r9 eks2 g
88 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
¼ r5 r6 k þ r5 k2 r5 ½r6 r9 þ r8 r6 þ k r9 eks2
r6 k2 k3 þ k ½r6 r9 þ r8 r6 þ k r9 eks2
¼ r5 r6 k þ r5 k2 ½r5 r6 r9 þ r5 r8 r6 þ k r5 r9 eks2
r6 k2 k3 þ ½k ðr6 r9 þ r8 r6 Þ þ k2 r9 eks2
¼ r5 r6 k þ ðr5 r6 Þ k2 k3
þ fr5 r6 ðr9 þ r8 Þ þ k ðr6 r9 þ r8 r6 r5 r9 Þ þ k2 r9 g eks2
w1 ¼ r5 r6 ; w2 ¼ r5 r6 ;
w3 ¼ r5 r6 ðr9 þ r8 Þ
w4 ¼ r6 r9 þ r8 r6 r5 r9
Then we define
0 1
r5 k 0 0
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6 eks2 A
ks2
0 r8 ðr9 e kÞ
¼ w1 k þ w2 k2 k3 þ fw3 þ k w4 þ k2 r9 g eks2
Second expression:
0 1
r5 eks1 0 0
B C
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6 eks2 A
r7 eks1 r8 ðr9 eks2 kÞ
!
ðr6 þ kÞ r6 eks2
¼ r5 eks1 det
r8 ðr9 eks2 kÞ
¼ r5 eks1 fðr6 þ kÞ ðr9 eks2 kÞ r8 r6 eks2 g
¼ r5 eks1 fr6 r9 eks2 þ r6 k k r9 eks2 þ k2 r8 r6 eks2 g
¼ r5 eks1 fr6 k þ k2 ½r6 r9 þ r8 r6 þ k r9 eks2 g
¼ ðr6 k þ k2 Þ r5 eks1 r5 ½r6 r9 þ r8 r6 þ k r9 ekðs2 þ s1 Þ ;
w5 ¼ r6 r9 þ r8 r6
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 89
0 1
r5 eks1 0 0
B C
det@ 0 ðr6 þ kÞ r6 eks2 A
r7 eks1 r8 ðr9 eks2 kÞ
¼ ðr6 k þ k2 Þ r5 eks1 r5 ½w5 þ k r9 ekðs2 þ s1 Þ
Third expression:
0 1
r5 eks1 ðr5 kÞ 0
B C
det@ 0 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A
r7 eks1 0 r8
ks1 0 ðr 6 þ kÞ
¼ r5 e det
0 r8
0 ðr6 þ kÞ
ðr5 kÞ det
r7 eks1 r8
0 ðr6 þ kÞ
¼ ðr5 kÞ det ¼ ðr5 kÞ r7 eks1 ðr6 þ kÞ
r7 eks1 r8
¼ ðr5 kÞ r7 ðr6 þ kÞ eks1 ¼ r7 ðr5 r6 r5 k þ k r6 þ k2 Þ eks1
¼ r7 ðr5 r6 þ k ½r6 r5 þ k2 Þ eks1
w1 ¼ r5 r6 ; w2 ¼ r5 r6 ) w2 ¼ r6 r5
0 1
r5 eks1 ðr5 kÞ 0
det@ 0 0 ðr6 þ kÞ A ¼ r7 ðw1 k w2 þ k2 Þ eks1
r7 eks1 0 r8
0 1
!11 ... !15
B . .. .. C
detB
@ .. .
C
. A ¼ ðr1 kÞ ðkÞ ½w1 k þ w2 k k
2 3
0 1
!11 ... !15
B . .. .. C
B
det@ .. C
. A ¼ r1 w1 k þ ðw1 r1 w2 Þ k þ ðw2 þ r1 Þ k k
2 3 4 5
.
!51 !55
ðw1 k þ w2 k2 k3 Þ r2 eks1
þ ðr3 r6 k þ r3 k2 Þ r5 eks1
þ fw3 k2 þ k3 w4 þ k4 r9 g eks2
þ fr1 w3 k r1 w4 k2 r1 r9 k3 g eks2
r2 fw3 þ k w4 þ k2 r9 g ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
r3 r5 ½w5 þ k r9 ekðs2 þ s1 Þ
þ ðw1 r4 r7 k w2 r4 r7 þ k2 r4 r7 Þ ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
0 1
!11 ... !15
B . .. .. C
B
det@ .. C
. A ¼ r1 w1 k þ ðw1 r1 w2 Þ k þ ðw2 þ r1 Þ k k
2 3 4 5
.
!51 !55
þ ðw1 r2 k w2 r2 k2 þ r2 k3 Þ eks1
þ ðr3 r6 r5 k þ r3 r5 k2 Þ eks1
þ fw3 k2 þ k3 w4 þ k4 r9 g eks2
þ fr1 w3 k r1 w4 k2 r1 r9 k3 g eks2
þ fr2 w3 k r2 w4 k2 r2 r9 g ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
þ ½r3 r5 w5 k r3 r5 r9 ekðs2 þ s1 Þ
þ ðw1 r4 r7 k w2 r4 r7 þ k2 r4 r7 Þ ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
0 1
!11 . . . !15
B . .. .. C
B
det@ .. C
. A ¼ r1 w1 k þ ðw1 r1 w2 Þ k þ ðw2 þ r1 Þ k k
2 3 4 5
.
!51 !55
þ fðr3 r6 r5 w1 r2 Þ k
þ ðr3 r5 w2 r2 Þ k2 þ r2 k3 g eks1
þ fr1 w3 k þ ðw3 r1 w4 Þ k2
þ ðw4 r1 r9 Þ k3 þ k4 r9 g eks2
þ fr2 w3 r3 r5 w5 w1 r4 r7
ðw2 r4 r7 þ r2 w4 þ r3 r5 r9 Þ k
þ ðr4 r7 r2 r9 Þ k2 g ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
92 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
X
5 X
3
Dðs1 ; s2 Þ ¼ Hl k l þ ½ Ak kk eks1
l¼2 k¼1
X4 X
2
þ½ Bk kk eks2 þ ½ Ck kk ekðs1 þ s2 Þ
k¼1 k¼0
X
5 X4
s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; DðsÞ ¼ H l kl þ ½ B k kk
l¼2 k¼1
ðAÞ
X
3 X
2
þ½ Ak kk eks þ ½ Ck kk eks
k¼1 k¼0
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 93
X
5 X4
Dðs1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ H l kl þ ½ B k kk
l¼2 k¼1
X
3 X2
þ½ Ak kk eks þ ½ Ck kk eks
k¼1 k¼0
X
4
Dðs1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ B1 k þ ðHl þ Bl Þ kl
l¼2
X
2
þ H5 k5 þ ½C0 þ ðAl þ Cl Þ kl þ A3 k3 eks
l¼1
k¼0
X m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ k þ q2 ðsÞ k2 þ . . .
k¼0
k¼0
The homogeneous system for X; Y; IL1 ; IRj ; IRS leads to a characteristic equation
P5
for the eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ aj
j¼0
P
3
k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj k j . The coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on
j¼0
94 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ B1 ; a2 ¼ H2 þ B2 ; a3 ¼ H3 þ B3
a4 ¼ H4 þ B4 ; a5 ¼ H5 ; c0 ðsÞ ¼ C0 ;
c1 ðsÞ ¼ A1 þ C1 ; c2 ðsÞ ¼ A2 þ C2 ; c3 ðsÞ ¼ A3 :
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, and cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous,
and differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ ; that is, k = 0 is not of PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0.
Furthermore, P(k), Q(k) are analytic functions of k, for which the following
requirements of the analysis (Kuang J and Cong Y 2005; Kuang Y 1993) can also
be verified in the present case:
(a) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R, then Pði xÞ þ Qði xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of F(x) = 0 is continuous and differentiable with
respect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ cannot have common imaginary roots.
That is for any real number x;
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0:
X
4
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ B1 i x þ ðHl þ Bl Þ ði xÞl þ H5 ði xÞ5
l¼2
X
4
¼ i x B1 þ ðHl þ Bl Þ il xl þ i H5 x5
l¼2
X
4
ðHl þ Bl Þ il xl ¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2 þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x4 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x3 i
l¼2
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2 þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x4
þ i ½x B1 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x3 þ H5 x5
X
2
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ C0 þ ðAl þ Cl Þ ði xÞl i A3 x3 ;
l¼1
X
2
ðAl þ Cl Þ ði xÞl ¼ i x ðA1 þ C1 Þ ðA2 þ C2 Þ x2
l¼1
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ C0 ðA2 þ C2 Þ x2 þ i ½x ðA1 þ C1 Þ A3 x3
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 95
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ
¼ C0 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2 ðA2 þ C2 Þ x2
þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x4 þ i ½x B1 þ x ðA1 þ C1 Þ
ðH2 þ B2 Þ x3 A3 x3 þ H5 x5 6¼ 0
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ
¼ C0 ðH2 þ B2 þ A2 þ C2 Þ x2
þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x4 þ i ½x ðA1 þ C1 þ B1 Þ
ðH2 þ B2 þ A3 Þ x3 þ H5 x5 6¼ 0
P
5
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies P2k x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial.
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2 þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x4
PI ði x; sÞ ¼ x B1 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x3 þ H5 x5 ;
QR ði x; sÞ ¼ C0 ðA2 þ C2 Þ x2
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ x ðA1 þ C1 Þ A3 x3
Hence
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
Pk ¼ a0 þ a1 k þ a2 k2 þ a3 k3 þ a4 k4 þ a5 k5 ;
Qk ¼ c0 þ c1 k þ c2 k2 þ c3 k3
n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m and aj ; cj : R þ 0 ! R are continuous and differentiable func-
tion of s such that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0. In the following “—” denotes complex and con-
jugate. PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s.
The coefficients faj ðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . .Þ and cj ðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ;
CP ; Rj ; s; . . .Þg 2 R depend on RFID TAG detector system’s LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ;
CP ; Rj ; s; . . . values. Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied argu-
ments: ðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . .Þ will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj,
cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their ar-
guments, and direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; a0 ¼ 0; c0 ðsÞ ¼ C0
C0 ¼ r2 w3 r3 r5 w5 w1 r4 r7
! r2 w3 r3 r5 w5 w1 r4 r7 6¼ 0:
R2 1 1
½ in w3
L1 LP C1 LP CP LP
R2in Rin 1 1
þ w5 w1 6¼ 0
L1 LP L1 CP LP RS CP
8 LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . . 2 R þ
i.e. k ¼ 0 is not a root of the characteristic equation. Furthermore PðkÞ; QðkÞ are
analytic functions of k for which the following requirements of the analysis (see
Kuang 1993, Sect. 3.4) can also be verified in the present case [6, 7].
(a) If k ¼ i x, x 2 R then Pði xÞ þ Qði xÞ 6¼ 0, i.e. P and Q have no common
imaginary roots. This condition was verified numerically in the entire
ðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; s; . . .Þ domain of interest.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
Indeed, in the limit:
QðkÞ c 0 þ c 1 k þ c 2 k2 þ c 3 k3
j j¼j j
PðkÞ a0 þ a1 k þ a2 k2 þ a3 k3 þ a4 k4 þ a5 k5
When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, and
inserting k ¼ i x into active RFID Schottky detector system’s characteristic
equation x must satisfy the following:
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin ðx sÞ ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos ðx sÞ ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 99
And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ s ¼ hðsÞ þ n 2 p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R ;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that is continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . . indicate the corre-
sponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on ^ðxÞ, remember in
kðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . .Þ and xðLP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . .Þ, and keeping
all parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in reference
[BK]. Differentiating RFID TAG detector system characteristic equation
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and inverting the
derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark
x ¼ LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . .; etc:;
When (x) can be any RFID Schottky detector parameter’s LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; . . . and
time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments ði x; xÞ,
and where
We define U and V:
QI ¼ x ðA1 þ C1 Þ A3 x3
PR ¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2 þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x4 ; PI ¼ x B1 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x3 þ H5 x5 ;
QR ¼ C0 ðA2 þ C2 Þ x2
PRx ¼ 4 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x3 2 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x ¼ 2 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x ð2 x2 1Þ
PIx ¼ B1 3 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2 þ 5 H5 x4 ;
QRx ¼ 2 ðA2 þ C2 Þ x; QIx ¼ ðA1 þ C1 Þ 3 A3 x2
PRs ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0; QRs ¼ 0; QIs ¼ 0; xs ¼ Fs =Fx
PRx PR ¼ 2 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x ð2 x2 1Þ ½ðH2 þ B2 Þ x4 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2
¼ 2 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x ð2 x2 1Þ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2 ½x2 1
¼ 2 ðH2 þ B2 Þ2 x3 ð2 x2 1Þ ½x2 1
PRx PR ¼ 2 ðH2 þ B2 Þ2 x3 ð2 x2 1Þ ½x2 1;
QRx QR ¼ 2 ðA2 þ C2 Þ x ½C0 ðA2 þ C2 Þ x2
Fs ¼ 2 ½ðPRs PR þ PIs PI Þ ðQRs QR þ QIs QI Þ ¼ 0;
PR PIx ¼ ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2 ðx2 1Þ ½B1 3 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2 þ 5 H5 x4
PI PRx ¼ 2 x2 ½B1 ðH2 þ B2 Þ x2 þ H5 x4 ðH2 þ B2 Þ ð2 x2 1Þ:
QR QIx ¼ ½C0 ðA2 þ C2 Þ x2 ½ðA1 þ C1 Þ 3 A3 x2 ;
QI QRx ¼ 2 x2 ½ðA1 þ C1 Þ A3 x2 ðA2 þ C2 Þ
V ¼ ðPR PIs PI PRs Þ ðQR QIs QI QRs Þ ¼ 0: Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 101
@x @x Fs @Rek @x Fs
Fx þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) ¼ ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; ¼ xs ¼
@s @s Fx @s k¼ix @s Fx
2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx @Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g; signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g
Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj 2 @s k¼ix
@x U @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g signfs þxþ g:
@s jPj2
The single diode detector, RL is the video load resistance which not seen in
RFID TAG receiver detector equivalent circuit. L1, the shunt inductance, provides a
current return path for the diode, and is chosen to be large compared to diode
impedance at the input or RF frequency. C1, the bypass capacitance, is chosen to be
sufficiently large that is capacitive reactance is small compared to the diode
impedance, but small enough to avoid having it resistance load the video circuit. Pin
is the RF input power applied to the detector circuit and VO is the output voltage
appearing across RL. LP is packaged parasitic inductance (Schottky linear equiva-
lent circuit). CP is package parasitic capacitance. RS is the diode’s parasitic series
resistance. Cj is junction parasitic capacitance, and Rj is the diode’s junction
resistance. LP, CP, and RL are constants. RS has some small variation with tem-
perature, but that variation is not a significant parameter in this analysis. Cj is a
function of both temperature and DC bias, but this analysis concerns itself with the
102 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
zero bias detectors and the variation with temperature is not significant. Rj is a key
element in equivalent circuit—its behavior clearly will affect the performance of the
detector circuit. For our stability switching analysis, we choose typical Schottky
detector parameter values: LP = 2 nH, RS = 1.5 X, CP = 0.08 pF, Cj = 0.2 pF,
Rj = 500 X, RL = 100 KX, Rin = 1 KX, L1 = 1 mH, C1 = 1 lF
Then we get the expression for Fðx; sÞ Schottky diode detector parameter
values. We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,
complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001. . .10, we can
be express by 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We plot the stability switch diagram based
on different delay values of our Schottky diode detector.
@Rek 2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@s Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
@Rek 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally, when all Schottky diode detector’s
1.5 RFID TAGs Detectors Stability Analysis … 103
parameters are known and the stability switch due to various time delay values s is
described in the following expression:
Remark we know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies its roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which give complex xi or
imaginary number, then unable to analyze stability [6, 7]. F function is independent
on s the parameter FðxÞ ¼ 0.
The results: We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore
negative, complex, and imaginary values of x. We define new MATLAB script
parameters: p2k ! G2k (k = 0…5). Running a MATLAB script to find x values,
gives the following results:
FðxÞ ¼ 0 ) x1 ¼ 1:0e þ 034 ; x2 ¼ 0 þ 4:1106i;
x3 ¼ 0 4:1106i; x4 ; . . .; x11 ¼ 0
If sign[K−1(s)] > 0 then the crossing proceeds from (−) to (+) respectively
(stable to unstable). If sign[K−1(s)] < 0 then the crossing proceeds from (+) to (−)
respectively (unstable to stable). Anyway the stability switching can occur only for
x = 1:0e þ 034 or x = 0 [30, 32].
There are systems which converting Radio Frequency (RF) energy into a Direct
Current (DC). In other areas, the circuit has been used to provide DC power to
operate remote autonomous devices that have no on-board power supply. In the
case of the part, a battery controlled by the burst switch is used to power the device.
CMOS (silicon) devices are equipped with a form of sleep circuitry with a current
draw at a minimum during sleep. An external input signal is used to wake-up the
device. The use of the switch requires considerably more design and analysis to
avoid false wake-up states and to ensure functionality under adverse conditions.
A simple generic burst switch is constructed from input RFID rectangular spiral
antenna, matching network, voltage doubler and load. The voltage doubler unit is
constructed from two diodes D1 and D2 with parasitic effects, delay in time. One of
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 105
the difficulties with the simple RF wake-up circuit is that spurious RF energy
(noise) could potentially waken the sleeping device. Thus, it may be necessary to
interface a low power or passive circuit (essentially a filter) between the RF switch
and the higher power consuming receiver. Spurious RF energy is presented in our
system as delay RFID antenna voltage and voltage derivative in time. The low
power circuit (filter) could be any low-power device that can be turned on for a
short period of time, increment a counter(s) and go back to sleep. In effect, this
device acts like a receiver. A watchdog timer may be used to reset the device after
extended noisy periods or after long intervals of inactivity. VA is the voltage on the
RFID rectangular spiral antenna.
RFID burst switch matching network design: The matching network match
between RFID rectangular spiral antenna impedance to our load impedance. First,
we need to calculate our matching network input impedance Zin [85] (Fig. 1.24).
Rectangular spiral RFID antenna length calculation and Inductance/resistance
We have the following rectangular spiral RFID antenna and first we need to
calculate the total length.
106 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
Aavg
A0
w B0 Bavg
k ¼ 1 ) L1 ¼ A0 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 2 ðw þ gÞ þ A0 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 3 ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 2 ) L2 ¼ A0 3 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 4 ðw þ gÞ þ A0 4 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 5 ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 3 ) L3 ¼ A0 5 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 6 ðw þ gÞ þ A0 6 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 7 ðw þ gÞ
X
N c 1
LT ¼ L0 þ fA0 ½1 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½3 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞg
X
N c 1
fA0 ½1 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½3 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞg
NX
C 1
¼ f2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ 8 k ðw þ gÞg
k¼1
NX
C 1
¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ðNC 1Þ 8 ðw þ gÞ k; k ¼ NC 1
k¼1 k¼1
X
N c 1
fA0 ½1 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½3 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞg
¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ðNC 1Þ 8 ðw þ gÞ ðNC 1Þ
¼ 2 ðNC 1Þ ½A0 þ B0 4 ðw þ gÞ
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ðw þ gÞ þ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ NC ðw þ gÞ ð8 NC 7Þ
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½1 þ 8 NC 7
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½8 NC 6
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3
LT ¼ 2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3g
LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r S r p a2
LT LT 2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
r S r p a2 r p a2
LT LT 2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3g
RDC jS¼wt ¼ ¼ ¼
rS rpwt rpwt
l0 X
4
2 Aavg Bavg
Lcalc ¼ ð Xk X3 Þ NcP ; X1 ¼ Aavg lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ
p k¼1;k6¼3 d ðA þ A2 þ B2 Þ
avg avg avg
2 Aavg Bavg
X2 ¼ Bavg lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ;
d ðBavg þ A2avg þ B2avg Þ
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ðAavg þ Bavg Þ
X3 ¼ 2 ðAavg þ Bavg A2avg þ B2avg Þ; X4 ¼
4
2 ðt þ wÞ
d¼ ; Aavg ¼ A0 Nc ðg þ wÞ; Bavg ¼ B0 Nc ðg þ wÞ
p
x—Angular frequency.
RDC þ j x Lcalc
¼ þ j x L1
½1 x2 Lcalc C1 þ j x C1 RDC
RDC þ j x Lcalc
Zin ¼
½1 x Lcalc C1 þ j x C1 RDC
2
½1 x2 Lcalc C1 j x C1 RDC
þ j x L1
½1 x2 Lcalc C1 j x C1 RDC
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 109
jxCload RL
1
RL
Zload ¼ ¼
jxCload þ RL
1 1 þ j x Cload RL
RL ð1 j x Cload RL Þ
¼
1 þ j x Cload RL ð1 j x Cload RL Þ
RL ð1 j x Cload RL Þ RL j x Cload RL RL
Zload ¼ ¼
1 þ j x Cload RL ð1 j x Cload RL Þ 1 þ x2 Cload
2 R2L
RL x Cload RL RL
Zload ¼ j
1 þ x Cload RL
2 2 2 1 þ x2 Cload
2 R2L
RL x Cload RL RL
A2 ¼ ; B2 ¼ ; Zload ¼ A2 j B2
1 þ x2 Cload RL
2 2 1 þ x2 Cload
2 R2L
If Zin ¼ Zload (complex conjugate) then maximum power is transferred from the
RFID rectangular spiral antenna to the load (no power reflections). For perfect
match A1 = A2 and B1 = B2.
1 dID1 1 dID2
ð ÞID2 ¼ Cload fVt Vt g
½ID1 þ I0 dt ½ID2 þ I0 dt
1 ID ID
þ fVt ln½ 1 þ 1 Vt ln½ 2 þ 1g
RL I0 I0
1 1
ð ÞID2 ¼ Cload fVt Y Vt Xg
½ID1 þ I0 ½ID2 þ I0
1 ID ID
þ fVt ln½ 1 þ 1 Vt ln½ 2 þ 1g
RL I0 I0
Cload Vt Cload Vt Vt ID ID
ID2 ¼ Y X fln½ 1 þ 1 þ ln½ 2 þ 1g
½ID1 þ I0 ½ID2 þ I0 RL I0 I0
Cload Vt Cload Vt Vt ID ID
ID2 ¼ Y X lnf½ 1 þ 1 ½ 2 þ 1g
½ID1 þ I0 ½ID2 þ I0 RL I0 I0
Cload Vt Cload Vt Vt ID1 ID 2
X ¼ ID2 Y lnf½ þ 1 ½ þ 1g
½ID2 þ I0 ½ID1 þ I0 RL I0 I0
ID ½ID2 þ I0 ½ID2 þ I0 ½ID þ I0 ID ID
X¼ 2 Y 2 lnf½ 1 þ 1 ½ 2 þ 1g
Cload Vt ½ID1 þ I0 RL Cload I0 I0
dID2 dID2 ID2 ½ID2 þ I0 ½ID2 þ I0
X¼ ) ¼
dt dt Cload Vt ½ID1 þ I0
½ID þ I0 ID ID
Y 2 lnf½ 1 þ 1 ½ 2 þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I0
dZ
ð Þ½L1 Lcalc ½Y þ X ¼ Lcalc C1 þ C1 RDC Z
dt
ID1
þ ½ID1 þ ID2 RDC þ Vt ln½ þ 1
I0
dZ
Lcalc C1 ¼ ½L1 Lcalc ½Y þ X C1 RDC Z
dt
ID
½ID1 þ ID2 RDC Vt ln½ 1 þ 1
I0
dZ ½L1 Lcalc RDC
¼ ½Y þ X Z
dt Lcalc C1 Lcalc
RDC Vt ID
½ID1 þ ID2 ln½ 1 þ 1
Lcalc C1 Lcalc C1 I0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 113
We have four variables in our system: Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y and we can represent our
dt ¼ n1 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ
system as the following set of differential equations: dZ
dID2 dID
¼ n2 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ; 1 ¼ n3 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ;
dt dt
n1 ¼ n1 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ; n2 ¼ n2 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ
n3 ¼ n3 ðZ; ID1 ; ID2 ; YÞ
½L1 Lcalc ID ½ID2 þ I0 ½ID2 þ I0
n1 ¼ ½Y 2 Y
Lcalc C1 Cload Vt ½ID1 þ I0
½ID þ I0 ID ID RDC
2 lnf½ 1 þ 1 ½ 2 þ 1g Z
RL Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
RDC Vt ID
½ID1 þ ID2 ln½ 1 þ 1
Lcalc C1 Lcalc C1 I0
ID2 ½ID2 þ I0 ½ID2 þ I0
n2 ¼ Y
Cload Vt ½ID1 þ I0
½ID þ I0 ID ID
2 lnf½ 1 þ 1 ½ 2 þ 1g; n3 ¼ Y
RL Cload I0 I0
RFID system burst switch’s voltage doubler unit is constructed from two diodes
D1 and D2 with parasitic effects, delay in time. D1 current delay in time
ID1 ðtÞ ! ID1 ðt s1 Þ and D2 current delay in time ID2 ðtÞ ! ID2 ðt s2 Þ.
Spurious RF energy is presented in our system as delay RFID antenna voltage (V
(t)) and voltage derivative (dV(t)/dt) in time. We neglect voltage delayed in time
and consider only voltage derivative delay in time (D).
114 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
dVðtÞ
ZðtÞ ¼ ; ZðtÞ ! Zðt DÞ
dt
dI dI
dt ¼ dt ; dt . To find equilibrium points (fixed
We consider no delay effects on dZ D1 D2
points) of the RFID system burst switches, we define lim ID1 ðt s1 Þ ¼ ID1 ðtÞ
t!1
dID1 dID dZ
¼ 0; 2 ¼ 0; ¼ 0 8 t s1 ; t s2 ;
dt dt dt
t D 9 ðt s1 Þ t; ðt s2 Þ t; ðt DÞ t; t ! 1:
dID1 dID I ½I þ I0
¼ 0 ) Y ¼ 0; 2 ¼ 0 ) D2 D2
dt dt Cload Vt
½I þ I0 I I
D2 lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ 0
RL Cload I0 I0
I ½I þ I0 ½ID2 þ I0 I I
D2 D2 lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ 0
Cload Vt RL Cload I0 I0
½ID 2 þ I0 ID 2 1 I
I
) ð þ lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1gÞ ¼ 0
Cload Vt RL I0 I0
Case I:
½ID 2 þ I0 dZ
¼ 0 ) ID 2 ¼ I0 ) ¼0
Cload dt
RDC Vt I
) ½ID 1 þ I0 RDC Z ln½ D1 þ 1 ¼ 0
C1 C1 I0
Case II:
ID 2 1 I I RL I I
þ lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ 0 ) ID2 þ lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ 0
Vt RL I0 I0 Vt I0 I0
ID 1 ID 2 RL R I
I
þ 1g ¼ ID 2 ) e Vt ID2 ¼ ½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1:
L
lnf½ þ 1 ½
I0 I0 Vt I0 I0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 115
Let us define
RL / X 1
/n /2 /3
/¼ ID2 ; e ¼ ¼ 1þ/þ þ þ
Vt n¼0
n! 2! 3!
RL X
1 ð RL I Þn
) e Vt ID2 ¼
V D2 t
n¼0
n!
RL X
1 ð RL ID 2 Þn X
1 ð1Þn ðRL I Þn
e Vt ID2 ¼ Vt V D2
¼ t
n¼0
n! n¼0
n!
RL ID 2 Þ2 ðRVLt ID 2 Þ3
ðRVLt
¼ 1 ID2 þ þ
Vt 2! 3!
VLt ID
R RL 1 RL 1 RL
e 2 ¼ 1 ID 2 þ ð Þ2 ðID 2 Þ2 ð Þ3 ðID 2 Þ3 þ
Vt 2 Vt 6 Vt
R
VLt ID
For easy investigation, we take e 2 ¼ 1 RVLt ID 2 ) 1 RVLt ID 2 ¼
I I
½ ID01 þ 1 ½ ID02 þ 1
VLt ID
R RL RL I I
e 2 ¼1 ID2 ) 1 ID 2 ¼ ½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1
Vt Vt I0 I0
RL ID 1 ID 2 ID 1 ID 2 ID 1 I RL
1 ID2 ¼ ½ þ 1 ½ þ 1 ) þ þ D2 þ I ¼0
Vt I0 I0 2
I0 I0 I0 Vt D2
dZ ½L1 Lcalc I ½ID2 þ I0
¼0) ½ D2
dt Lcalc C1 Cload Vt
½ID 2 þ I0 ID 1 I RDC
lnf½ þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g Z
RL Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
RDC Vt I
½ID 1 þ ID 2 ln½ D1 þ 1 ¼ 0
Lcalc C1 Lcalc C1 I0
Remark Our system, equilibrium points (fixed points) can be calculated numeri-
cally rather than analytically (Case I and Case II). For both cases Y* = 0,
Y* = dID1/dt = 0. At equilibrium no current is flowing through D1, D1 is in OFF
state (VB > 0).
The standard local stability analysis about any one of the equilibrium points of
the RFID system burst switch consists in adding to coordinate ½Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y ekt and retaining the
first order terms in Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y. The system of three homogeneous equations leads
to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The polynomial char-
acteristic equations accept by set the below currents and currents derivative with
respect to time into RFID system burst switch equations. RFID system burst
switches fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
116 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
½z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2
(third fixed point), etc.
We choose these expressions for our ZðtÞ; ID1 ðtÞ; ID2 ðtÞ; YðtÞ as a small dis-
placement ½z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y from the RFID system burst switch fixed points in time
t = 0.
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ ID1 þ iD1 ; ID2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ ID2 þ iD2 ; Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y; Zðt ¼ 0Þ
¼ Z ðjÞ þ z:
First, we take RFID system burst switch variable Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y differential equa-
tions and adding to coordinate ½Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential terms ½z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y ekt and retaining the first order terms in z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y.
dZðtÞ
ZðtÞ ¼ Z ðjÞ þ z ekt ) ¼ z k ekt
dt
dZ ½L1 Lcalc ID ½ID2 þ I0 ½ID2 þ I0
¼ ½Y 2 Y
dt Lcalc C1 Cload Vt ½ID1 þ I0
½ID þ I0 ID ID RDC
2 lnf½ 1 þ 1 ½ 2 þ 1g Z
RL Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
RDC Vt ID
½ID1 þ ID2 ln½ 1 þ 1
LcalcC1 Lcalc C1 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðI þ iD2 ekt Þ ½ID2 þ iD2 ekt þ I0
z k ekt ¼ ½ðY ðjÞ þ y ekt Þ D2
Lcalc C1 Cload Vt
ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2 ekt þ I0
ðjÞ
ðY ðjÞ þ y ekt Þ
½ID1 þ iD1 ekt þ I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2 ekt þ I0 I þ iD1 ekt I þ iD2 ekt
lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I0
RDC
ðZ ðjÞ þ z ekt Þ
Lcalc
ðjÞ ðjÞ RDC
½ðID1 þ iD1 ekt Þ þ ID2 þ iD2 ekt
Lcalc C1
ðjÞ
Vt I þ iD1 ekt
ln½ D1 þ 1
Lcalc C1 I0
½L1 Lcalc
z k ekt ¼ ½ðY ðjÞ þ y ekt Þ
Lcalc C1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2 ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2 iD2 ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt þ i2D2 e2kt
Cload Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2 ekt ½ðID1 þ I0 Þ iD1 ekt
ðjÞ
ðjÞ ðY ðjÞ þ y ekt Þ
kt
½ðID1 þ I0 Þ þ iD1 e ½ðID1 þ I0 Þ iD1 e kt
½L1 Lcalc
z k ekt ¼ ½ðY ðjÞ þ y ekt Þ
Lcalc C1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2 ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2 iD2 ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt þ i2D2 e2kt
Cload Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðI þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD1 ekt þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt iD2 iD1 e2kt
f D2 ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2 i2D1 e2kt
ðY ðjÞ þ y ekt Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2 ekt þ I0 I þ iD1 ekt I þ iD2 ekt
lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I0
RDC
ðZ ðjÞ þ z ekt Þ
Lcalc
ðjÞ ðjÞ RDC
½ID1 iD1 ekt þ ID2 þ iD2 ekt
Lcalc C1
ðjÞ
Vt I þ iD1 ekt
ln½ D1 þ 0
Lcalc C1 I0
Calculation No. 1:
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1 ekt I þ iD2 ekt
lnf½ þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID 1 1 I 1
¼ ln½ð½ þ 1 þ iD1 ekt Þ ð½ D2 þ 1 þ iD2 ekt Þ
I0 I0 I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID 1 I I 1
¼ lnf½ þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1 þ ½ D1 þ 1 iD2 ekt
I0 I0 I0 I0
ðjÞ
ID2 1 1
þ½ þ 1 iD1 ekt þ 2 iD1 iD2 e2kt g
I0 I0 I0
iD1 iD2 0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 119
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1 ekt ID 2 þ iD2 ekt
lnf½ þ 1 ½ þ 1g
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 I I 1 I 1
¼ lnf½ þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1 þ ½ D1 þ 1 iD2 ekt þ ½ D2 þ 1 iD1 ekt g
I0 I0 I0 I0 I0 I0
We define:
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðjÞ ðjÞ I 1 I 1
X1 ¼ X1 ðID1 ; ID2 ; iD2 ; iD1 ; kÞ ¼ ½ D1 þ 1 iD2 ekt þ ½ D2 þ 1 iD1 ekt
I0 I0 I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
I þ iD1 ekt I þ iD2 ekt I I
lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g ¼ lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1 þ X1 g
I0 I0 I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I þ iD1 ekt I þ iD2 ekt
lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I I X1
¼ lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1 ð1 þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Þg
I0 I0 ID ID
½ I0 þ 1 ½ I0 þ 1
1 2
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 I
½ þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1 [ 0
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1 ekt I þ iD2 ekt
lnf½ þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I I X1
¼ lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g þ lnf1 þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
g
I0 I0 ID ID
½ I0 þ 1 ½ I0 þ 1
1 2
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID I
X1 ½ I0 þ 1 I10 iD2 ekt þ ½ ID02 þ 1 I10 iD1 ekt
1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ ðjÞ ðjÞ
I I I I
½ ID01 þ 1 ½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1 ½ ID02 þ 1
iD2 iD1 1 kt
¼f ðjÞ
þ ðjÞ
g e
ID ID I0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
x2 x3 x4 X1
xn
lnð1 þ xÞ ¼ x þ þ... ¼ ð1Þn þ 1 . . . ) lnð1 þ xÞ x
2 3 4 n¼1
n
120 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
X1 X1
lnf1 þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
g ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID ID ID I
½ I01 þ 1 ½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1 ½ ID02 þ 1
iD2 iD1 1 kt
¼f ðjÞ
þ ðjÞ
g e
ID ID I0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I þ iD1 ekt I þ iD2 ekt
lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I I iD iD 1
¼ lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g þ f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g ekt
I0 I0 I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1
Calculation No. 2:
Calculation No. 3:
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1 ekt I iD ekt I iD1 ekt
ln½ þ 1 ¼ ln½ð D1 þ 1Þ þ 1 ¼ ln½ð D1 þ 1Þ f1 þ ðjÞ
g
I0 I0 I0 I0 I
I0 ð ID01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1 ekt I iD1 ekt
ln½ þ 1 ¼ lnð D1 þ 1Þ þ lnf1 þ ðjÞ
g
I0 I0 I
I0 ð ID01 þ 1Þ
x2 x3 x4 X1
xn
lnð1 þ xÞ ¼ x þ þ ¼ ð1Þn þ 1 ) lnð1 þ xÞ x
2 3 4 n¼1
n
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID1 þ iD1 ekt I iD1 ekt
ln½ þ 1 ¼ lnð D1 þ 1Þ þ lnf1 þ ðjÞ
g
I0 I0 I
I0 ð ID01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ
ID 1 iD1 ekt
¼ lnð þ 1Þ þ ðjÞ
I0 I
I0 ð ID01 þ 1Þ
½L1 Lcalc
z k ekt ¼ ½ðY ðjÞ þ y ekt Þ
Lcalc C1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2 ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2 iD2 ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt
Cload Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD1 ekt þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt
f ðjÞ
g ðY ðjÞ þ y ekt Þ
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ I I
f lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
þ f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g ekt
RL Cload ID ID I 0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2 ekt I I RDC
þ lnð½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1Þg ðZ ðjÞ þ z ekt Þ
RL Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
ðjÞ ðjÞ RDC
½ID1 iD1 ekt þ ID2 þ iD2 ekt
Lcalc C1
ðjÞ
Vt I iD1 ekt
flnð D1 þ 1Þ þ g
Lcalc C1 I0 I
ðjÞ
I0 ð ID01 þ 1Þ
dZ
j ðjÞ ðjÞ ¼0
dt @ID1 ;ID2 ;Y ðjÞ ;Z ðjÞ
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc I ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðI þ I0 Þ
½Y ðjÞ D2 f DðjÞ2 g Y ðjÞ
Lcalc C1 Cload Vt ðI þ I0 Þ D1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ ID1 ID2
lnf½ þ 1 ½ þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ
RDC ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ RDC Vt I
Z ½ID1 þ ID2 lnð D1 þ 1Þ ¼ 0
Lcalc Lcalc C1 Lcalc C1 I0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 123
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc I iD2 ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt
z k ekt ¼ ½y ekt D2
Lcalc C1 Cload Vt
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
y ekt
ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ
þ ðjÞ
i ekt Y ðjÞ þ ðjÞ
2 D1
iD1 ekt y ekt
ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
iD2 ekt Y ðjÞ iD2 ekt y ekt
ðjÞ
ðjÞ
ðID1 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g ekt
RL Cload I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2 ekt I I
lnð½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1Þ
RL Cload I0 I0
RDC RDC
z ekt ½iD1 ekt þ iD2 ekt
Lcalc Lcalc C1
Vt iD1 ekt
f g
Lcalc C1 I
ðjÞ
I0 ð ID01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ
iD1 y 0 ) ðjÞ
iD1 ekt y ekt ! e;
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
iD2 ekt y ekt
iD2 y 0 ) ðjÞ
!e
ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc I iD2 ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt
z k ekt ¼ ½y ekt D2
Lcalc C1 Cload Vt
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
y ekt
ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt Y ðjÞ
þ ðjÞ
iD1 ekt Y ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 i D1 1
f þ g ekt
RL Cload ðjÞ
ID
ðjÞ
ID I0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2 ekt I I RDC
lnð½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1Þ z ekt
RL Cload I0 I0 Lcalc
RDC Vt iD1 ekt
½iD1 ekt þ iD2 ekt f g
Lcalc C1 Lcalc C1 I
ðjÞ
I0 ð ID01 þ 1Þ
124 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ID2 þ iD2 ekt ½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2 ekt
k iD2 ekt ¼
Cload Vt
ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2 ekt
ðjÞ
½Y ðjÞ þ y ekt
½ðID1 þ I0 Þ þ iD1 ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2 ekt ðI þ iD1 ekt Þ ðI þ iD2 ekt Þ
lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I0
iD1 y 0; iD2 y 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2 ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ ID2 iD2 ekt þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt
k iD2 ekt ¼
Cload Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ Y ðjÞ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD1 ekt þ Y ðjÞ ðID1 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ y ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½ðID2 þ I0 Þ þ iD2 ekt ðI þ iD1 ekt Þ ðI þ iD2 ekt Þ
lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I0
Remark: it is reader exercise to build the system Jacobian matrix and analyze the
dynamic and stability of the system based on eigenvalues investigation.
ðjÞ ðjÞ
We define ID1 ðt s1 Þ ¼ ID1 þ iD1 ekðts1 Þ ; ID2 ðt s2 Þ ¼ ID2 þ iD2 ekðts2 Þ and
Zðt DÞ ¼ Z ðjÞ þ z ekðtDÞ . Then we get three delayed differential equations with
respect to coordinates ½Z; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y arbitrarily small increments of exponential
dZðtÞ dID1 ðtÞ dID2 ðtÞ
½z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y ekt . We consider no delay effects on dt ; dt ; dt ; Y
ðjÞ
¼ 0.
I0 ð ID01 þ 1Þ
iD1 ekt ! iD1 ekt eks1 ; iD2 ekt ! iD2 ekt eks2 ;
z ekt ! z ekt ekD ; Y ðjÞ ¼ 0
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 129
I0 ð ID01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ½L1 Lcalc f2 ID2 þ I0 g iD2 eks2
zk y
Lcalc C1 Lcalc C1 Cload Vt
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ
y
Lcalc C1 ðI ðjÞ þ I0 Þ
D1
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 eks2 iD eks1 1
þ f ðjÞ þ 1ðjÞ g
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I I I0
½ ID02 þ 1 ½ ID01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc iD2 eks2 I I
lnð½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1Þ
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 I0
RDC kD ks1 ks2 RDC
ze ½iD1 e þ iD 2 e
Lcalc Lcalc C1
Vt iD eks1
f 1 ðjÞ g¼0
Lcalc C1 I
I0 ð ID01 þ 1Þ
130 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ½L1 Lcalc f2 ID2 þ I0 g iD2 eks2
zk y
Lcalc C1 Lcalc C1 Cload Vt
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ
y
Lcalc C1 ðI ðjÞ þ I0 Þ
D1
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 eks2
þ
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 IDðjÞ2
½ I0 þ 1
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD1 eks1
þ
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 IDðjÞ1
½ I0 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc iD2 eks2 I I
lnð½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1Þ
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 I0
RDC kD ks1 ks2 RDC
ze ½iD1 e þ iD2 e
Lcalc Lcalc C1
Vt iD eks1
f 1 ðjÞ g¼0
Lcalc C1 ID
I0 ð I0 þ 1Þ
1
ðjÞ
RDC kD ½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ eks1
f e kg z þ f ðjÞ
Lcalc Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 ID1
½ I0 þ 1
Vt eks1 RDC
f gþ eks1 g iD1
Lcalc C1 ðjÞ
ID Lcalc C1
I0 ð I01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ eks2
þf ðjÞ
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 ID2
½ I0 þ 1
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc f2 ID2 þ I0 g eks2
Lcalc C1 Cload Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc eks2 I I
lnð½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1Þ
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ
RDC ½L1 Lcalc ðI þ I0 Þ
eks2 g iD2 f1 þ DðjÞ2 gy¼0
Lcalc C1 Lcalc C1 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 131
ðjÞ
RDC kD ½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1
f e kg z þ f
Lcalc Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 ðjÞ
ID
½ I01 þ 1
Vt 1 RDC
f gþ g eks1 iD1
Lcalc C1 ðjÞ
ID Lcalc C1
I0 ð I01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1 ½L1 Lcalc f2 ID2 þ I0 g
þf
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 I
ðjÞ
Lcalc C1 Cload Vt
½ ID02 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc 1 I I RDC
lnð½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1Þ g eks2 iD2
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 I0 Lcalc C1
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðI þ I0 Þ
f1 þ DðjÞ2 gy¼0
Lcalc C1 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1 Vt 1 RDC
!1 ¼ f gþ
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 ID
ðjÞ
Lcalc C1 ðjÞ
ID Lcalc C1
½ I01 þ 1 I0 ð I01 þ 1Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1 ½L1 Lcalc f2 ID2 þ I0 g
!2 ¼
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 I
ðjÞ
Lcalc C1 Cload Vt
½ ID02 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc 1 I I RDC
lnð½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1Þ
Lcalc C1 RL Cload I0 I0 Lcalc C1
ðjÞ
½L1 Lcalc ðI þ I0 Þ
!3 ¼ f1 þ DðjÞ2 g
Lcalc C1 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
RDC kD
f e kg z þ !1 eks1 iD1 þ !2 eks2 iD2 !3 y ¼ 0
Lcalc
iD1 ekt ! iD1 ekt eks1 ; iD2 ekt ! iD2 ekt eks2 ;
z ekt ! z ekt ekD ; Y ðjÞ ¼ 0
132 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
ðjÞ
Y ðjÞ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD1 ekt Y ðjÞ iD2 ekt
f ðjÞ
þ ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ y ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðiiiÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD iD 1
f ðjÞ 2 þ ðjÞ 1 g ekt
RL Cload ID ID I 0
½ I02 þ 1 ½ I01 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2 ekt I I
lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I0
iD1 ekt ! iD1 ekt eks1 ; iD2 ekt ! iD2 ekt eks2 ;
z ekt ! z ekt ekD ; Y ðjÞ ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ID2 iD2 ekt eks2 þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 ekt eks2
k iD2 ekt ¼
Cload Vt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðID1 þ I0 Þ y ekt
f ðjÞ
g
ðID1 þ I0 Þ2
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 eks2 iD eks1 1 kt
f ðjÞ þ 1ðjÞ g e
RL Cload ID ID I0
½ I0 þ 1
2
½ I0 þ 1
1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2 ekt eks2 I I
lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I0
kt
We divide above two sides by e term.
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 133
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iD2 eks2 I I
lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
½2 ID2 þ I0 iD2 eks2 ðID2 þ I0 Þ ðID2 þ I0 Þ iD2 eks2
k iD2 ¼ ðjÞ y
Cload Vt ðID1 þ I0 Þ RL Cload I0 IDðjÞ2
½ þ 1 I0
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ðID2þ I0 Þ iD1 e iD e ks1 ks2 ID 1 ID 2
ðjÞ 2 lnf½ þ 1 ½ þ 1g
RL Cload I0 I RL Cload I0 I0
½ ID01 þ 1
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1
eks1 iD1 k iD2
RL Cload I0 ðjÞ
ID
½ I0 þ 11
ðjÞ ðjÞ
½2 ID2 þ I0 ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1
ð þ
Cload Vt RL Cload I0 ðjÞ
ID
½ I02 þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
1 I I ðI þ I0 Þ
þ lnf½ D1 þ 1 ½ D2 þ 1gÞ iD2 eks2 DðjÞ2 y¼0
RL Cload I0 I0 ðID1 þ I0 Þ
ðjÞ
ðID2 þ I0 Þ 1
!4 ¼ ;
RL Cload I0 ðjÞ
ID
½ I0 þ 1
1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
In the equilibrium fixed points: Z ðjÞ ; ID1 ; ID2 ; Y ðjÞ ¼ 0
134 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
The small increments Jacobian of our RFID burst switch system is as follows:
RDC kD
f e kg z þ !1 eks1 iD1
Lcalc
þ !2 eks2 iD2 !3 y ¼ 0
k iD1 þ y ¼ 0
!4 eks1 iD1 ½k þ !5 eks2 iD2 !6 y ¼ 0
dID1 dYðtÞ d 2 ID1
¼Y ) ¼
dt dt dt2
d 2 ID1 dYðtÞ
We consider dt2 ! e then dt ¼0
dYðtÞ
YðtÞ ¼ Y ðjÞ þ y ekt ) ¼ y k ekt ;
dt
dYðtÞ
¼ 0 ) y k ekt ¼ 0 ) jekt 6¼0 y k ¼ 0 ) y k ¼ 0
dt 0 1
0 1 z
N11 . . . N14 B C
B . B iD1 C
B . .. .. C
CB C
@ . . . A B C
B ¼ 0;
C
@ iD2 A
N41 N44
y
RDC kD
N11 ¼ e k; N12 ¼ !1 eks1 ; N13 ¼ !2 eks2
Lcalc
N14 ¼ !3 ; N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ k; N23 ¼ 0; N24 ¼ 1;
N31 ¼ 0; N32 ¼ !4 eks1 ; N33 ¼ k !5 eks2
N34 ¼ !6 ; N41 ¼ 0; N42 ¼ 0; N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k
0 1
N11 . . . N14
B . .. .. C
AkI ¼B @ .. .
C
. A; det jA k Ij ¼ 0
N31 N34
RDC kD RDC kðD þ s2 Þ
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; DÞ ¼ k4 þ k3 ½ e þ !5 eks2 þ k2 !5 e
Lcalc Lcalc
RDC RDC
ðIÞ Dðk; s2 ¼ s; D ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ k3 þ ½k3 !5 þ k2 !5 eks
Lcalc Lcalc
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 135
RDC RDC
ðIIÞ Dðk; s2 ¼ 0; D [ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ k3 !5 þ ½k3 þ k2 ! 5 ekD
Lcalc Lcalc
RDC
Dðk; s2 ¼ sD ; D ¼ sD Þ ¼ k4 þ k3 ½ þ !5 eksD
Lcalc
ðIIIÞ
RDC ksD ksD
þ k2 ! 5 e e
Lcalc
Under Taylor series approximation: eksD 1 k sD . The Maclaurin series is
a Taylor series expansion of a eksD function about zero (0). We get the following
general characteristic equation D(k, sD) under Taylor series approximation:
eksD 1 k sD [5, 6].
RDC
Dðk; s2 ¼ sD ; D ¼ sD Þ ¼ k4 þ fk3 ½ þ !5
Lcalc
RDC
þ k2 ! 5 ð1 k sD Þg eksD
Lcalc
Our RFID bursts switch homogeneous system for z; iD1 ; iD2 ; y leads to a char-
acteristic equation for the eigenvalue k having the form PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0.
First case s2 ¼ s; D ¼ 0. The general characteristic equation D(k, s) is ad follow:
RDC RDC
Dðk; s2 ¼ s; D ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ k3 þ ½k3 !5 þ k2 !5 eks
Lcalc Lcalc
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ k ¼ P0 ðsÞ
k
k¼0
X
M
Qn ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ k þ q2 ðsÞ k2 þ q3 ðsÞ k3 q0 ðsÞ
k¼0
RDC
¼ 0; q1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; q2 ðsÞ ¼ !5 ; q3 ðsÞ ¼ !5
Lcalc
The homogeneous system for z; iD1 ; i0D2 ; y leads to a characteristic equation for
the eigenvalue k having the form
X
4 X
3
Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ aj k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj k j
j¼0 j¼0
And the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on qi ; qk and delay
qi ; qk is any RFID burst switching parameters, other parameters keep as a constant.
RDC
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ 0; a3 ¼ ;
Lcalc
RDC
a4 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ 0; c1 ¼ 0; c2 ¼ !5 ; c3 ¼ ! 5
Lcalc
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 (not in sub case I) for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e. k = 0 is not a of
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0. Furthermore, P(k), Q(k) are analytic functions of k, for
which the following requirements of the analysis [BK] can also be verified in the
present case:
(a) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R, then Pði xÞ þ Qði xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of F (x) = 0 is continuous and differentiable
respect to qi ; qk .
1.6 RFID System Burst Switch Stability Analysis Under Delayed … 137
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That
is, for any real number x,
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0:
RDC
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x4 i x3 ;
Lcalc
RDC
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ i x3 !5 x2 !5
Lcalc
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ
RDC RDC
¼ x4 i x3 i x3 !5 x2 !5 6¼ 0
Lcalc Lcalc
RDC 2
jPði x; sÞj2 ¼ P2R þ P2I ¼ x8 þ x6 ½ ;
Lcalc
RDC 2
jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ Q2R þ Q2I ¼ x6 !25 þ x4 !25 ½
Lcalc
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2
RDC 2 RDC 2
¼ x8 þ x6 ½ x6 !25 x4 !25 ½
Lcalc Lcalc
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2
RDC 2 RDC 2
¼ x8 þ x6 f½ !25 g x4 !25 ½
Lcalc Lcalc
U0 ; U2 ; U4 ; U6 ; U8
RDC 2 RDC 2
U0 ¼ 0; U2 ¼ 0; U4 ¼ !25 ½ ; U6 ¼ ½ !25 ; U8 ¼ 1
Lcalc Lcalc
P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies U2k x2k ¼ 0. And its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. Furthermore
RDC RDC
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x4 ; PI ði x; sÞ ¼ x3 ; QR ði x; sÞ ¼ x2 !5
Lcalc Lcalc
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ x3 !5 ; sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
138 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
DC 2
x7 !5 þ x5 ½LRcalc !5 ½ LRcalc
DC
þ Lcalc x !5
RDC 6
sin hðsÞ ¼ ; cos hðsÞ ¼ ¼0
DC 2 DC 2
x6 !25 þ x4 !25 ½LRcalc x6 !25 þ x4 !25 ½LRcalc
DC 2 DC 2
x7 !5 þ x5 ½LRcalc !5 x5 !5 fx2 þ ½LRcalc g x
sin hðsÞ ¼ 2
¼ ¼ ; cos hðsÞ ¼ 0
DC 2
x6 !5 þ x4 !5 ½Lcalc
2 2 RDC
x4 !5 fx2 þ ½Lcalc
2 R
g !5
RDC RDC
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ 0; a3 ¼ ; a4 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ 0; c1 ¼ 0; c2 ¼ !5 ; c3 ¼ ! 5
Lcalc Lcalc
@Rek
^1 ðLcalc Þ ¼ ð Þ ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Lcalc k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðRDC Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lcalc ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . ¼ const
@RDC k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lcalc ; RDC ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . ¼ const
@C1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðL1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; Cload ; RL ; s; . . . ¼ const
@L1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðCload Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; RL ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Cload k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; . . . ¼ const
@s k¼ix
x 2 Rþ :
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2
X
4
¼ U0 þ U2 x2 þ U4 x4 þ U6 x6 þ U8 x8 ¼ U2k x2k
k¼0
P
4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies U2k x2k ¼ 0 When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i
k¼0
PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼ i x into RFID burst switch
system’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following :
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin x s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos x s ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
140 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ s ¼ hðsÞ þ n 2 p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ þ n2p
n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions
I ! R; Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞSn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and
differentiable in s. In the following, the subscripts k; x; Lcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ;
Cload ; RL ; . . . indicate the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate
on ^ðxÞ, remember in kðLcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ; Cload ; RL ; . . .Þ and xðLcalc ; RDC ; C1 ; L1 ;
Cload ; RL ; . . .Þ, and keeping all parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation
closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiating RFID burst switch charac-
teristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and
inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark
parameters and time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we have dropped the
arguments ði x; xÞ, and where
RDC RDC
PR ¼ x4 ; PI ¼ x3 ; QR ¼ x2 !5 ;
Lcalc Lcalc
QI ¼ x3 !5 ; PRs ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0
RDC
QRs ¼ 0; QIs ¼ 0; PRx ¼ 4 x3 ; PIx ¼ 3 x2 ;
Lcalc
RDC
QRx ¼ 2 x !5 ; QIx ¼ 3 x2 !5
Lcalc
RDC RDC
QI QRx ¼ 2 x4 !25 ; PR PIx ¼ 3 x6 ;
Lcalc Lcalc
RDC RDC
PI PRx ¼ 4 x6 ; QR QIx ¼ 3 x4 !25
Lcalc Lcalc
RDC 2
PRx PR ¼ 4 x ; QRx QR ¼ 2 x !5 ½
7 3 2
;
Lcalc
V ¼ ðPR PIs PI PRs Þ ðQR QIs QI QRs Þ ¼ 0
RDC
U ¼ ðPR PIx P1 PRx Þ ðQR QIx QI QRx Þ ¼ 3 x6
Lcalc
RDC RDC RDC
þ 4 x6 ð3 x4 !25 2 x4 !25 Þ
Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc
RDC RDC RDC
U ¼ 3 x6 þ 4 x6 3 x4 !25
Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc
RDC RDC RDC
þ 2 x4 !25 ¼ x6 x4 !25
Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc
6 RDC 2 RDC RDC
QIx QI ¼ 3:x !5 ; U ¼ x
5 2
x !5
4
¼ x4 ½x2 !25
Lcalc Lcalc Lcalc
Fs ¼ 2 ½ðPRs PR þ PIs PI Þ ðQRs QR þ QIs QI Þ ¼ 0;
RDC 2
PIx PI ¼ 3 x5 ½
Lcalc
142 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@s k¼ix
@x U @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g signfs þxþ g
@s jPj2
@x U @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g signfs þxþ gj@x¼0
@s jPj2 @s
¼ signfFx g signfxg
RDC 2
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signf4 x7 þ 3 x5 ½
Lcalc
RDC 2
ð2 x3 !25 ½ þ 3 x5 !25 Þg signfxg
Lcalc
RFID burst switch system stability switching analysis is done according the
below flow chart and based on [BK] geometric stability switch criteria in delay
differential systems with delay dependent parameters article [30, 31].
144 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
Exercises
1. Active RFID system has two sources S1(t), S2(t) and two antennas L1 and L2
(rectangular antennas) as appear in the equivalent circuit. L1 and L2 configu-
ration structure can be represented as L2 inductor antenna which is connected in
the middle of L1 antenna. The overall parameters of two antennas are the same.
P
2
L1 ¼ Lcalc1 ¼ ½lp0 ð½ Xi X3 þ X4 Þ Ncp . Rectangular antennas. L2 ¼
i¼1
P
2 pffiffi
ð1 þ pÞ
Lcalc2 ¼ ½lp0 ð½ Xi X3 þ X4 Þ Nc . X1, X2, X3, and X4 global antenna
i¼1
parameters are the same for inductor antenna L1 and L2.
You can neglect the mutual inductance between inductor antennas L1 and L2. C
(Gama) is the two antennas trim parameter (0 < C < 1).
Exercises 145
Xk
1 X k
€ þð 1 þ
V
1
Þ
1 _ 1
V þ pffiffiffiffiffi P V ¼ ½
1 dVSi
m
R1 R C C R dt
i¼1 Si 1
½ L1 þ Li C1 1 i¼1 Si
i¼2
3. Our passive RFID TAG contains one RFID IC and two rectangular antennas in
the series. The two rectangular antenna parameters are not the same and the
definition is related to global parameters: Xi1, Xi2, Xi3, Xi4. i = 1for the first
antenna and i = 2 for the second antenna. The matrix formulation for RFID
differential equation:
146 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
2 3
0 1 0
6 f " 1 #g f C11R1 g 07
2 3 6 l X4 7
6 7
dV1 6 C1 f 0
ðX13 þ X1k Þ Nc p
7
6 dV 6 p 7
2 7
dt
6
4 dt 5 ¼ 6 k¼1;k6 ¼ 3 7
" # 7
dV3 6 l X4 7
6 2 7
dt
6 þ 0 ðX23 þ X2k Þ Ncp g 7
4 p k¼1;k6¼3
5
2 3 2 3 0 0 0
V1 0
4 V2 5 þ 4 0 5
V3 1
R1 and C1 are parameters for RFID TAG IC. V1, V2, V3 are system variables.
All other antenna parameters are the same as discuss in the chapter.
3:1 Find RFID TAG system fixed points and discuss the stability.
3:2 Discuss the system Eigen direction, Eigen solutions, Eigen vectors, and
Eigenvalues behavior for t ! ∞.
3:3 How our system stability is affected by different values of “p” parameter?
Draw Stable/Unstable diagram.
3:4 Analyze RFID TAG system dynamical behavior for X2k ¼ X1k 2
C;
k = 1,…, 4 RFID TAG antennas global parameter index. C is a shifting
parameter between the square of first antenna global parameters (X1k 2
) and
second antenna global parameters (X2k ).
3:5 How our RFID TAG system behavior changes for multiple values of
rectangular antenna’s number of turns (NC) ; NC ! 2 NC . NC is the same
for the first and second RFID TAG antenna.
4. We have delayed in time passive RFID TAG system. Due to electromagnetic
interferences, we have RFID TAG’s voltage and voltage derivative with
delays s þ 1 and s2 1 respectively in time. V1 ðtÞ ! V1 ðt ½s þ 1Þ; V2 ðtÞ !
V2 ðt ½s2 1Þ. We consider no delay effect on dVdt1 ðtÞ and dVdt2 ðtÞ . The RFID
TAG antenna is rectangular. Xi; i = 1, 2, 3, 4 are RFID TAG antenna global
parameters as discuss in the chapter. R1 and C1 are RFID TAG IC parameters.
dV1
¼ V2 ðt ½s2 1Þ
dt
dV2 1
¼ f g V1 ðt ½s þ 1Þ
dt C1 lp0 ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Ncp
1
V2 ðt ½s2 1Þ
C1 R1
4:2 Find the system characteristic equation (Dðk; sÞ), s is our delay parameter.
Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ eks .
4:3 Find polynomial in x representation Fðx; sÞ and sketch 3D function. Find
sin hðsÞ and cos hðsÞ expressions.
4:4 Find U; V; xs expressions and define maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2
N0 .
4:5 Find K1 ðC1 Þ; K1 ðR1 Þ; K1 ðsÞ; signðK1 ðsÞÞ expressions and discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameters.
5. We have a RFID system with two rectangular antennas (L1, L2) in parallel and
one RFID IC (R1 and C1 parameters). There are parasitic resistances of our
RFID system, rp1 ; rp2 ; rp1 6¼ rp2 . The following figure is equivalent circuit of our
RFID system.
Parameters are the same for the first and second antennas. L1 ðX11 ; X12 ; X13 ;
X14 ; . . .Þ; L2 ðX21 ; X22 ; X23 ; X24 ; . . .Þ; X11 ¼ X21 ; X12 ¼ X22 X13 ¼ X23 ; X14 ¼
X24 . We define four variables for our RFID system. V1(t)—voltage on the first
antenna, V2(t) = dV1(t)/dt—voltage derivative on the first antenna, V3(t)—
voltage on the second antenna, V4(t) = dV3(t)/dt—voltage derivative on the
second antenna.
Remark Voltages on RFID TAG antennas are only on equivalent circuit
inductors L1, L2 without parasitic resistances. Due to electromagnetic inter-
ferences, we get RFID TAG’s antenna voltages and voltages derivatives with
delays in time:
148 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
D1 6¼ D2 ; V1 ðtÞ ! V1 ðt sÞ
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
V2 ðtÞ ! V2 ðt s D1 Þ; V3 ðtÞ ! V3 ðt s þ 1Þ;
pffiffiffi
V4 ðtÞ ! V4 ðt jD1 D2 j sÞ:
D1 [ 0; D2 [ 0:
5:1 Find RFID system, differential equations, fixed points and discuss stability
for s ¼ 0; Di [ 0 i = 1, 2; D1 6¼ D2 .
5:2 Find the system characteristic equation Dðk; s; D1 ; D2 Þ, s is our delay
parameter and D1, D2 are parameters.
nðs; D1 ; D2 Þ
Dðk; s; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ Pn ðk; s; D1 ; D2 Þ þ Qm ðk; s; D1 ; D2 Þ eknðs;D1 ;D2 Þ :
5:3 Find polynomial in x representation Fðx; sÞjD1 ;D2 parameters ¼ 0 and sketch
3D function. Find sin hðsÞ and cos hðsÞ expressions.
5:4 Find U, V, xs expressions and define maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2
N0 for the cases: (A) D1 = D, D2 = 0 ; (B) D1 = 0, D2 = D ;
(C) D1 = D2 = D
5:5 Find
K1 ðsÞ; K1 ðD1 Þ; K1 ðD2 Þ; signðK1 ðsÞÞ; signðK1 ðD1 ÞÞ; signðK1 ðD2 ÞÞ
expressions and discuss stability switching for different values of s; D1 ; D2 .
6. We have triple loop antennas arranged as a shifted gate in X direction.
The RFID TAG is semi passive and contains a battery that enables long reading
distance and also enables the tag to operate independently of the reader. The
double antenna gate is employed due to the fact that this antenna consists of
three parallel loops (primary, secondary, and third loop). Due to electromag-
netic interferences there are differences in time delays with respect to gate
antenna first, second and third loop voltages and voltages derivatives. The delay
voltages are Vi1 ðt s1 Þ; Vi2 ðt s2 Þ; Vi3 ðt s3 Þ respectively (s1 6¼ s2 6¼ s3 ) and
pffiffiffi
ðtDÞ dVi2 ðt½D þ DÞ
and dVi3 ðt½D þ 1Þ
2
delayed voltage derivative dVi1 dt ; dt dt ; s1 0;
s2 0; s3 0; D 0. Each triple loop gate antenna is defined as a three
inductors in series Li1, Li2, Li3 with series parasitic resistors rp1 ; rp2 ; i—index of
the first and second gate. First gate: L11, L12, L13 is mostly formed by traces on
the planar PCB. 2 Lm;12 ; 2 Lm;13 ; 2 Lm;23 , elements represent the mutual
inductances between each two antenna inductors in the gate. The second loop is
within the first loop and third loop is within the second loop. We consider that
the triple loop antennas parameter values are the same in the first and second
gate ðLa1 ; La2 ; La3 ; Lb1 ; Lb2 ; Lb3 ; a1 ; a2 ; a3 Þ.
Exercises 149
2 Aj 2 Aj
L1j ¼ 4 fLbj ln½ þ Laj ln½ þ 2 ½aj þ lcj ðLaj þ Lbj Þg
aj ðLb1 þ lcj Þ aj ðLbj þ lcj Þ
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lcj ¼ L2aj þ L2bj ; Aj ¼ Laj Lbj
j = 1 first loop, j = 2 s loop, j = 3 third loop. Since three inductors (L11, L12,
L13) are in series and there are mutual inductances, the total antenna inductance
for the first gate:
X
3 X2 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
LT jfirst gate ¼ L1k þ 2 ½ Lm;iði þ 1Þ þ Lm;13 ; Lm;12 ¼ K1 L11 L12
k¼1 i¼1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lm;13 ¼ K2 L11 L13 ; Lm;23 ¼ K3 L12 L13 :
Lm,i-j is the mutual inductance between inductors i and j. K1, K2, and K3 are the
coupling coefficients of two inductors. 0
K1
1; 0
K2
1; 0
K3
1. We
consider the case our RFID shifted gate system is passive (power source is
disconnected). Remark: no delay effects on RFID system variables derivatives.
6:1 Find RFID double gate differential equations and fixed points (only one
gate).
6:2 Find Jacobian of our RFID shifted gate system and characteristic equation:
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; DÞ.
150 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
6:3 Find F(x, s) = 0 and its roots sinh(s) and cosh(s) expressions.
6:4 Find K1 ðs1 Þ; K1 ðs2 Þ; K1 ðs3 Þ; K1 ðDÞ expressions.
6:5 Discuss system stability switching for various values of s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; D.
7. We have RFID detector system which is represented by the following set of
differential equations matrix representation. Nkl (k = 1,…5; l = 1,…,5) global
parameter expressions are the same as describe in Sect. (1.5). Additional ele-
ments are X1, X2 and V(t) second order derivative column matrix element w. V
(t) represents the RFID tag antenna voltage in time, incoming RF small signal
from RFID reader.
0 1
dX 0 1
dt
B dY C 0 1 X
B dt C N11 ... N1n þ X2 B C
B C BY C
B dIL1 C B .. .. .. C B C
B dt C¼B C B C
B C @ . . . A B IL1 C
B dIRj C B C
B dt C Nm1 þ X1 Nmn @ IR j A
@ A n¼m¼5
dIRS IR S
dt
0 R 1 011 0 1
L Lin L
0
B 1 PC B PC B C
B 0 C B0C BwC
B C B C dVðtÞ B C d 2 VðtÞ
B C B
þ B L C VðtÞ þ B 0 C C þB C
B 0 C dt2
1
B 1 C B C dt B C
@ 0 A @0A @0A
0 0 0
7:1 Draw RFID TAG detector circuit which characterizes by our above dif-
ferential equations, matrix representation. What are the additional circuit
components and their location which represents by matrix’s parameters X1,
X2 and w? Remark: probably they are additional Schottky diode’s parasitic
elements.
7:2 Find system fixed points and discuss stability in the case of no parasitic
delay effects si ¼ 0; i = 1,2,….
7:3 Consider that the Schottky detector diode has a package parasitic induc-
tance Lp delay element in time s1 and package parasitic capacitance Cp
delay element in time s2 . Find fixed points coordinate expressions, con-
sider RF in signal VðtÞ ¼ A0 þ B0 f 2 ðtÞ.
8:1 Draw RFID TAG detector circuit which characterizes by our above dif-
ferential equations, matrix representation. What are the additional circuit
components and their location which represents by matrix’s parameters X1,
X2 and w1, w2? Remark: probably they are additional Schottky diode’s
parasitic elements.
8:2 Find system fixed points and discuss stability in the case of no parasitic
delay effects si ¼ 0; i = 1,2,….
8:3 Consider that the Schottky detector diode has a package parasitic inductance
Lp delay element in time s and package parasitic capacitance Cp delay
element in time s2 þ 1 . Find fixed points coordinate expressions, consider
RFin signal VðtÞ ¼ A0 þ B0 f 3 ðtÞ VðtÞ ¼ A0 þ B0 f 3 ðtÞ; jf ðtÞj\
1 & A0 jf ðtÞj; 0\B0 \1. Find Jacobian of our RFID Schottky detector
system.
8:4 Find our system characteristic equation Dðk; sÞ.
8:5 Find ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k
@s Þk¼ix ; LP ; L1 ; Cf ; Rin ; Rs ; CP ; Rj ; . . . ¼ const; x 2 R þ
and discuss stability switching for different values of delay parameter s.
9. Active RFID system includes forcing sources Si(t) ; i = 1, 2,… and antennas
inductors (L1, L2,…). All antennas are rectangular. The following differential
152 1 RFID Antennas Systems Descriptions and Analysis
equation describes our RFID system (forced Van der pol equation). R1 and C1
are RFID IC parameters. Additional parameters are X1 and X2.
Xk
€ þ ð 1 þ X1
V
1
Þ
1 _
V þ pffiffiffiffiffi
1
V
R1 R C1 P
m
i¼1 Si ½ L1 þ X2 Li C1
i¼2
1 X
k
1 dVSi
¼ ½
C1 i¼1 RSi dt
dV1
¼ V2 ðt ½s3 1Þ;
dt
dV2 1 pffiffiffi
¼ f l g V1 ðt ½ s þ 1Þ
dt C1 p ½X1 þ X2 X3 þ X4 Nc
0 p
1
V2 ðt ½s3 1Þ
C1 R1
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 :
10:5 Find K1 ðC1 Þ; K1 ðR1 Þ; K1 ðsÞ; signðK1 ðsÞÞ expressions and discuss
stability switching for different value of s parameters.
Chapter 2
Microwave Elements Description
and Stability Analysis
There are three types of microwave circuits which include microwave elements.
The first is a discrete circuit; packaged diodes/transistors mounted in coax and
waveguide assemblies. Second Hybrid MIC (Microwave Integrated Circuit);
diodes/transistors and microstrip fabricated separately and then assembled. The
third is MMIC (Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit); diodes, transistors and
microstrip fabricated simultaneously. The monolithic microwave integrated circuit
(MMIC) consists of diodes, transistor, microstrip transmission lines, microstrip
circuits, and other circuit elements, such as lumped capacitors, resistors, etc., which
have parasitic effects influence on overall system stability behavior. The discrete
microwave circuit can be PIN diodes mounted in a coaxial transmission line which
characterize by parasitic effects and delay variables in time. Hybrid microwave
integrated circuit’s wire bonds cause reliability problems and parasitic effects;
stability issue can affect every hybrid microwave integrated circuits. Many receivers
are often at risk of having their front end burned out by high power RF. Receivers
are traditionally protected by a power limiter circuit. The limiter diode is a special
type of the PIN diode. Due to the parasitic effects of microstrip transmission lines
there is a delay in time for input RF signal result in the end. Power limiters use with
transmission line face stability behavior for different delay time values. Reflection
Type Phase Shifter (RTPS), employing a circulator. Micro strip transmission lines
with three port active circulator, stability analysis under time delayed. Many RF
systems are use Active circulator as a passive non-reciprocal three- or four-port
device, in which microwave or radio frequency power entering any port is trans-
mitted to the next port in rotation (only). Micro strip transmission lines fid those
active circulator ports and face a delay parasitic effect of transferring signals in time.
These circulator’s micro strip transmission lines, delays cause to system instability.
Resonant RF network antennas are important to plasma sources with many appli-
cations. The cylindrical resonant RF network antennas run as large volume plasma
sources and have stability switching due to system’s copper legs parasitic effects.
The cylindrical RF network antennas structure is 16-leg cylindrical (birdcage) RF
antenna which has electrical circuit and opposite points of RF feeding and
grounding. Due to cylindrical antenna parasitic delayed in time, there is a stability
issue by analyzing its operation. Tunnel diode is the p-n junction device that
exhibits negative resistance. That means when the voltage increases the current
through it decreases. Typical Tunnel Diode (TD) I-V characteristic has two distinct
features: (1) it is STRONGLY non-linear (compare to the resistor I-V). Current-
Voltage relationships for TDs cannot be described using the Ohm’s law (2) it has a
negative differential resistance (NDR) region. Tunnel diode can be a microwave
oscillator. Transient is in the resonant cavity after turning the bias voltage ON. The
resonant circuit with NDR can oscillate. The TD microwave oscillator has parasitic
effects in time and delay variables. Stability is a very crucial issue when designing
microwave oscillator by using Tunnel Diode (TD) [14, 15].
dynamically. The need of the incorporation of a time delay is often of the existence
of any stage structure. It is often difficult to analytically study models with delay
dependent parameters, even if only a single discrete delay is present. There is a
practical guidelines that combine graphical information with analytical work to
effectively study the local stability of models involving delay dependent parame-
ters. The stability of a given steady state is simply determined by the graphs of
some function of microstrip delays s1, s2 which can be expressed, explicitly and
thus can be easily depicted by Matlab and other popular software. We need only
look at one such function and locate the zeros. This function often has only two
zeros, providing thresholds for stability switches. As time delay increases, stability
changes from stable to unstable to stable. We emphasize the local stability aspects
of some models with delay dependent parameters. Additionally, there is a general
geometric criterion that, theoretically speaking, can be applied to models with many
delays, or even distributed delays. The simplest case of a first order characteristic
equation, providing more user friendly geometric and analytic criteria for stability
switches. The analytical criteria provided for the first and second order cases can be
used to obtain some insightful analytical statements and can be helpful for con-
ducting simulations. The most obvious way in which to amount limiter diode in
shunt across a microstrip line. Two leads of limiter diode are mounted in parallel to
the transmission line and the third lead is soldered to the ground pad as shown. D1
is a limiter diode [24–26, 33–35] (Fig. 2.1).
The shunt mounted limiter diode equivalent circuit with microstrip lines delayed
in time. The time delay for the first line segment is s1 and the second line segment s2.
See Fig. 2.2.
It is possible to locate several limiter PIN diode on microstrip line, but in the
current chapter we focus on one limiter diode with the specific connection structure.
We consider for simplicity that the microstrip segments resistances are neglected
and either related voltages Vs1 ! e, Vs2 ! e. Then we can define
Va(t) = Vi(t − s1); Vo(t) = Va(t − s2) = Vi(t − (s1 + s2)). We do our stability
analysis of three different cases: s1 ¼ s; s2 ! e; s1 ! e; s2 ¼ s; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s. We
defined Is1 ; Is2 as the current through first and second delay lines respectively.
Vs1 ; Vs2 ! e ) V0 ðtÞ ¼ Vi ðt ðs1 þ s2 ÞÞ (Vs1 ; Vs2 are voltages of the first and
second delay lines). Is1 ¼ ViRV
s
a
; Is2 ¼ VaRV
s
0
; Is1 ¼ Ia þ Is2 ; Ia ¼ ILi ; i ¼ 0; 1; 2
1 2
dIa V dV
V ¼ VR1 ¼ VC1 ; Va ¼ ðL0 þ L1 þ L2 Þ þ V; Ia ¼ þ C1
dt R1 dt
dIa 1 dV 2
d V dIa X
2
¼ þ C1 2 ; Va ¼ Li þ V; V ¼ VðtÞ
dt R1 dt dt dt i¼0
1 dV d2V X 2
Va ¼ ½ þ C1 2 Li þ V
R1 dt dt i¼0
2
We consider Vs1 ; Vs2 ! e then Vi ðt s1 Þ ¼ Va ¼ ½R11 dV dt þ C1 dt2
d V
P2
i¼0 Li þ V. Shifting equation Vi ðt s1 Þ ¼ Va ¼ . . . in time by s1 gives equation:
1 dVðt þ s1 Þ d 2 Vðt þ s1 Þ X2
Vi ðtÞ ¼ ½ þ C1 L þ Vðt þ s1 Þ:
i¼0 i
R1 dt dt2
Finally, we get two Power limiter equations (with delays s1, s2)
1 dVðt s2 Þ d 2 Vðt s2 Þ X 2
V0 ðtÞ ¼ ½ þ C1 Li þ Vðt s2 Þ; Vi ðt s1 Þ
R1 dt dt2 i¼0
1 dV d2V X 2
¼½ þ C1 2 Li þ V
R1 dt dt i¼0
We get two Power limiter equations, one of them is a differential equation which
involves input coming signal.
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 159
1 dV d2 V X 2
Vi ðt s1 Þ ¼ ½ þ C1 2 Li þ V; xðtÞ ¼ Vi ðt s1 Þ;
R1 dt dt i¼0
X
2
1 X 2
n1 ¼ C 1 Li ; n2 ¼ Li ; n3 ¼ 1; V ¼ f ðn1 ; n2 ; n3 ; xðtÞÞ
i¼0
R1 i¼0
€ n1 þ V_ n2 þ V n3 ¼ xðtÞ ) V
V € þ V_ n2 þ V n3 ¼ 1 xðtÞ: This differential
n1 n1 n1
equation can recognize as forced Van der Pol equation. The basic Van der Pol
equation can be written in the form: V € þ a /ðVÞ V_ þ V ¼ b pðtÞ
n2 1 n 1 n3 1 1
¼ ; 3¼ ; ! ð1 eÞ; b pðtÞ ¼ xðtÞ ¼ xðtÞ
n1 R1 C1 n1 P2 n1 n1 P2
C1 Li C1 Li
i¼0 i¼0
1
¼ Vi ðt s1 Þ
P2
C1 Li
i¼0
1 1 1
a /ðVÞ ¼ ;a¼ ; /ðVÞ ¼ 1; b ¼ ! ð1 eÞ; pðtÞ
R1 C1 R1 C1 P2
C1 Li
i¼0
¼ Vi ðt s1 Þ
We can consider the incoming signal after delay s1 is T periodic and a, b are
non-negative parameters. It is convenient to write our power limiter Van der Pol
equation as autonomous system when ðV; W; hÞ 2 R2 x S2 .
V_ ¼ W R11C1 ; W_ ¼ V þ P1 2 Vi ðh s1 Þ; h_ ¼ 1: We suppose
C1 i¼0
Li
a; b 1, since we are interested in the periodic coming signal response we use 2p
x
periodic transformation.
! ! !
u1 cos x t x1 sin x t V
¼
u2 sin x t x1 cos x t W
du1 1 x2 1
¼ /ðVÞ cos x t ð Þ V sin x t
dt R1 C1 x
1
P sin x t Vi ðt s1 Þ
x C1 2i¼0 Li
du2 1 x2 1
¼ /ðVÞ sin x t ð Þ V cos x t
dt R1 C1 x
1
P cos x t Vi ðt s1 Þ
x C1 2i¼0 Li
160 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
du1 1 u1
¼ ½u1 r u2 ðu21 þ u22 Þ;
dt 2 R1 C1 4
du2 1 u2 1
¼ ½u2 þ r u1 ðu21 þ u22 Þ P
dt 2 R1 C1 4 2 x C1 2i¼0 Li
There is no significant difference if we set one of delays s1, s2 to zero for that
Van der Pol equation. The second Power limiter differential equation involves
output voltage.
1 dVðt s2 Þ d 2 Vðt s2 Þ X 2
V0 ðtÞ ¼ ½ þ C1 Li þ Vðt s2 Þ
R1 dt dt2 i¼0
We consider coming signal cause at t = 0 voltage V(t = 0), first power limiter
equation (Van der Pol). Additionally V0(t = 0) = 0. Then we get our second delay
2Þ
2
2Þ
P
differential equation: ½R11 dVðts
dt þ C1 d Vðts
dt2 2i¼0 Li þ Vðt s2 Þ ¼ 0.
V(t = 0) is calculated from the first power limiter Van der Pol equation,
V(t = 0) = U1). We can represent our second power limiter delay differential
equation as a general linear real scalar neutral differential equation with single delay
s2 (s2 > 0).
X
n
dk Xn
dk d0
ak VðtÞ þ bk Vðt sÞ ¼ 0; 0 VðtÞ , VðtÞ
k¼0
dtk k¼0
dtk dt
d0 X2
dk
0
Vðt s2 Þ , Vðt s2 Þ; n ¼ 2; a0 ¼ a1 ¼ a2 ; bk k Vðt s2 Þ ¼ 0
dt k¼0
dt
1 X 2
b0 ¼ 1; b1 ¼ Li ; b2
R1 i¼0
X2
d0 d d2
¼ C1 Li ; b0 0 Vðt s2 Þ þ b1 Vðt s2 Þ þ b2 2 Vðt s2 Þ ¼ 0
i¼0
dt dt dt
d0 d
Since 0
Vðt s2 Þ , Vðt s2 Þ then b0 Vðt s2 Þ þ b1 Vðt s2 Þ þ b2
dt dt
d2
Vðt s2 Þ ¼ 0.
dt2
It is well known that if the characteristic equation associated with a linear neutral
equation has roots only with negative real parts, and if all the roots are uniformly
bounded away from the imaginary axis, then the trivial solution of the linear neutral
equation is uniformly asymptotically stable. Thus the stability analysis of power
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 161
limiter second neural differential equation with single delay s2 is very much
equivalent to the problem of determining the conditions under which all roots of its
characteristic equation lie in the half of the complex plane and are uniformly
bounded away from the imaginary axis. In our case ak ¼ 0 then
P P
ð 2k¼0 bk kk Þ eks2 ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ 0; QðkÞ ¼ 2k¼0 bk kk .
Theorem 1.0 if |b2| > 1, then for all s2, there is an infinite number of roots of
P
QðkÞ eks2 ¼ 0 whose real parts are positive. b2 ¼ C1 2i¼0 Li )
P2
jC1 i¼0 Li j [ 1.
Theorem 2.0 if |b2| > 1, then the trivial solution of power limiter DDE (Delay
Differential Equation) is unstable for all s2 > 0.
Theorem 3.0 Let f ðk; s2 Þ ¼ k2 þ a k2 eks2 þ gðk; s2 Þ where gðk; s2 Þ is an
analytic function. Assume |a| > 1 and lim Rek [ 0 k12 gðk; s2 Þ ¼ 0 then, for, all s2 [ 0,
jkj ! 1
there is an infinite number of roots of f ðk; s2 Þ ¼ 0 whose real parts are positive. In
fact, there is a sequence {ki} of the roots of f ðk; s2 Þ ¼ 0 such jki j ! 1, and
limi!1 Re ki ¼ s12 ln jaj [ 0 when s2 [ 0.
dVðtÞ dVðt s2 Þ
Vðt s2 Þ ¼ V ðiÞ þ v ekðts2 Þ ;¼ v k ekt ;
dt dt
ks2 d Vðt s2 Þ
2
kt
¼vke e ; ¼ v k e eks2
2 kt
dt2
162 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
We choose the above expression for our V(t) as small displacement v from our
circuit fixed points at time t = 0. Vðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ V ðiÞ þ v. We get the following char-
acteristic equation: a k2 eks2 þ b k eks2 þ c eks2 ¼ 0. ða k2 þ b k þ cÞ
eks2 ¼ 0. Suppose k ¼ i x; x [ 0 is the root of ða k2 þ b k þ cÞ eks2 ¼ 0
for some s2 . Euler’s formulas: eixs2 ¼ cosðx s2 Þ i sinðx s2 Þ. We get
½ðc a x2 Þ þ i b x eixs2 ¼ 0 and ðc a x2 Þ cosðx s2 Þ þ b x
sinðx s2 Þ þ i ðb x cosðx s2 Þ ðc a x Þ sinðx s2 ÞÞ ¼ 0
2
P P
a ¼ C1 2i¼0 Li ; b ¼ R11 2i¼0 Li ; c ¼ 1; x 6¼ 0; x [ 0. We get two equations:
ðc a x2 Þ cosðx s2 Þ þ b x sinðx s2 Þ
¼ 0; ðb x cosðx s2 Þ ðc a x2 Þ sinðx s2 ÞÞ ¼ 0
1 X 2 X2
b ! e; Li ! e; R1 ! 1 & Li ! e; b2 4 c a ¼ 0 ) b2
R1 i¼0 i¼0
X2
¼4ca) Li ¼ 4 C1 R21
i¼0
d
ds2 ½a k2 þ b k þ c ¼ ð2 a k þ bÞ ds
dk
2
dk
. To get the expression for ds 2
we need
to calculate d
ds2 f½a k2 ðs2 Þ þ b kðs2 Þ þ c ekðs2 Þs2 g ¼ 0
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 163
dk k ða k2 þ b k þ cÞ
¼ ;
ds2 a s2 k2 þ k ð2 a b s2 Þ þ ðb c s2 Þ
dk 1 a s2 k2 þ k ð2 a b s2 Þ þ ðb c s2 Þ
ð Þ ¼
ds2 k ða k2 þ b k þ cÞ
2Þ
If kðs2 Þ ¼ i x is not simple, then dkðs s2 . Since x 6¼ 0; eixs2 6¼ 0
ds2 ¼ 0 at s2 ¼
hence a ði xÞ2 þ i x b þ c ¼ 0 Which implies ðc a x2 Þ þ i x b ¼ 0 and
then
X
2
1 X 2
b ¼ 0 & c a x2 ¼ 0 ) x2 C 1 Li ¼ 1; Li ! e
i¼0
R1 i¼0
dk a s2 k2 þ k ð2 a b s2 Þ þ ðb c s2 Þ
signfReð Þ1 gjk¼ix ¼ signfRe½ gjk¼ix
ds2 k ða k2 þ b k þ cÞ
dk 1 a s2 k þ ð2 a b s2 Þ b c s2
signReð Þ jk¼ix ¼ signfRe½ þ gjk¼ix
ds2 ða k þ b k þ cÞ
2
k ða k2 þ b k þ cÞ
dk 1
Finally, we get the expression for signfReðds 2
Þ gjk¼ix .
dk 1 a s2 x2 b þ ð2 a b s2 Þ ðc a x2 Þ
signfReð Þ gjk¼ix ¼ signf
ds2 ðc a x2 Þ2 þ ðx bÞ2
x2 b ðb c s2 Þ
g
ðx2 bÞ2 þ x2 ðc a x2 Þ2
dk 1
signfReð Þ gjk¼ix ¼ signfa s2 x2 b þ ð2 a b s2 Þ ðc a x2 Þ
ds2
x2 b ðb c s2 Þg
dk
signfReð Þ1 gjk¼ix ¼ fx2 ½2 a2 b2 þ b c s2 þ 2 a c b s2 cg
ds2
dk 1
By inserting the expression for x2 , we can check the sign of fReðds 2
Þ gjk¼ix .
There are two sets of values s2 for which there are imaginary roots:
0 h1 \2p; 0 h2 \2p. sn;1 ¼ xh1þ þ 2pn h2
x þ ; sn;2 ¼ x þ x .
2pn
We choose power limiter critical parameters: Li, R1, C1 and s2 delay parameter
and examine the possibility of stability transitions (bifurcation) due to parameter
values change or s2 delay change. The analysis consists in identifying the root of
power limiter second DDEs characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of
the complex k—plane, where by changing circuits parameters or s2 delay,
164 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
Rek may, at crossing, changes its sign from “−” to “+” i.e. from stable focus E* to
an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining
the sign of the partial derivatives with respect to circuit parameters or delay s2 .
dðRekÞ dðRekÞ
signf gjk¼ix ; signf gjk¼ix xi ¼ R1 ; C1 ; Li
ds2 dxi
@Re k @Re k
K1 ðR1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; Li ¼ const:; ; K1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; R1 ; Li
@R1 k¼ix @C1 k¼ix
¼ const:;
K1 ðLi Þ ¼ ð@ Re k
@Li Þk¼ix ; R1 ; C1 ¼ const:; The subscripts k; x; R1 ; C1 ; Li indicate
the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on KðR1 Þ, remem-
bering that kðR1 ; C1 ; Li Þ; xððR1 ; C1 ; Li Þ, and keeping C1, Li and s2 fixed. The
derivation closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiating characteristic
equation with respect to R1, and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one
calculates:
2 P2 U xR1 þ V
KðR1 Þ ¼ Fx ðs2 xR1 þ Þ;
FR1 þ 4 V
2 2 P2
PðkÞ ¼ 0 ) Pði xÞ ¼ 0 ) PR ¼ PI ¼ 0
PRx ¼ PIx ¼ PRR1 ¼ PIR1 ¼ 0;
X
2
1 X 2 X2
QðkÞ ¼ cj k j ¼ 1 þ ð Li Þ k þ C1 ð L i Þ k2
j¼0
R1 i¼0 i¼0
X
2
1 X 2 X2
Qðk ¼ i xÞ ¼ cj k j ¼ 1 þ i ð Li Þ x C1 ð Li Þ x2 ;
j¼0
R1 i¼0 i¼0
X
2 X
2
1 X 2
Qði xÞ ¼ cj k j ¼ f1 C1 ð Li Þ x2 g þ i ð Li Þ x
j¼0 i¼0
R1 i¼0
X
2
1 X 2
@QR
QR ¼ 1 C1 ð Li Þ x2 ; QI ¼ ð Li Þ x; QRx ¼
i¼0
R1 i¼0 @x
X
2
@QI 1 X 2
¼ 2 x C1 ð Li Þ; QIx ¼ ¼ ð Li Þ
i¼0
@x R1 i¼0
@QR 1 X 2
U xR1 þ V
QRR1 ¼ ¼ 0; QIR1 ¼ 2 ð Li Þ x; P2 ! 0; s2 xR1
@R1 R1 i¼0 P2
2
KðR1 Þ ! Fx ðU xR1 þ VÞ
FR21 þ 4 V 2
Where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments (i x, R1), and where
Fx ¼ 2 ½ðPRx PR þ PIx PI Þ ðQRx QR þ QIx QI Þ
FR1 ¼ 2 ½ðPRR1 PR þ PIR1 PI Þ ðQRR1 QR þ QIR1 QI Þ; xR1 ¼ FR1 =Fx
X
2 X
2
1
Fx ¼ 2 x ð Li Þ ½2 C1 ð Li Þ f2 x2 C12 þ g;
i¼0 i¼0
R21
2 x2 X 2
FR1 ¼ ð Li Þ2
R31 i¼0
P
FR1 x ð 2i¼0 Li Þ
xR1 ¼ ¼
Fx P
2
R31 ½2 C1 ð Li Þ f2 x2 C12 þ 1
R21
g
i¼0
U ¼ ðPR PIx PI PRx Þ ðQR QIx QI QRx Þ;
V ¼ ðPR PIR1 PI PRR1 Þ ðQR QIR1 QI QRR1 Þ
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 167
1 X 2 X 2
U¼ ð Li Þ f1 þ C1 x2 ð Li Þg;
R1 i¼0 i¼0
1 X 2 X2
V¼ ð L i Þ x ½1 C 1 ð Li Þ x2
R21 i¼0 i¼0
where x 2 R þ . If K(R1) > 0, K(C1) > 0, K(Li) > 0 (or <0), then the crossing
proceeds from “−” to “+” (or from “+” to “−”), respectively. Without loss of
generality, one may consider only k ¼ ix, x > 0 and ignore its complex conjugate.
Writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ; QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ and inserting k ¼ i x
into characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sinðx s2 Þ ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cosðx s2 Þ ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
@Re k 1
signð Þ jk¼ix ¼ signKðR1 Þ; signKðR1 Þ
@R1
U xR1 þ V
¼ signðFx Þ signðs2 xR1 þ Þ
P2
168 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
We need now to do the same procedure for C1 parameter and get the expression:
@Rek
K1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; R1 ; Li ¼ const:; ;
@C1 k¼ix
PðkÞ ¼ 0 ) Pði xÞ ¼ 0 ) PR ¼ PI ¼ 0
PRx ¼ PIx ¼ PRC1 ¼ PIC1 ¼ 0; PC1 ¼ PRC1 þ i PIC1 ;
X
2
1 X 2
QR ¼ 1 C1 ð Li Þ x2 ; QI ¼ ð Li Þ x
i¼0
R1 i¼0
@QR X2
@QI
QRC1 ¼ ¼ ð Li Þ x2 ; QIC1 ¼ ¼ 0;
@C1 i¼0
@C 1
@Q
P ¼ 0 ) P2 ¼ 0; QC1 ¼ ¼ QRC1 þ i QIC1
@C1
P
2
x ½1 C1 ð Li Þ x2
FC i¼0
x C1 ¼ 1 ¼
Fx P
2
2 C1 ð Li Þ f2 x2 C12 þ 1
R21
g
i¼0
@Rek 1
signð Þ jk¼ix ¼ signKðC1 Þ ; sign KðC1 Þ
@C1
U xC1 þ V
¼ signðFx Þ signðs2 xC1 þ Þ
P2
U is always less than zero (U < 0). V for parameter R1: if x > 0 then V > 0 for
P
C1 ð 2i¼0 Li Þ x2 \1 otherwise V < 0. V for parameter C1: If x > 0 then V < 0.
Now we choose our parameter L1.
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 169
X
3
PI ¼ PR ¼ 0 ) P2 ¼ 0; PIL1 ¼ PRL1 ¼ 0 Li ¼ L1 þ L2 þ L3 ;
i¼1
P3 P3 P3
@ Li @ Li @ @Q Li
i¼1
¼ i¼1
¼ i¼1
¼ 1; QL1 ¼
¼ QRL1 þ i QIL1
@L1 @L2 @L3 @L1
P
3 P3
@ Li @ Li
@QR @QI x x
QRL1 ¼ ¼ C1 x2 i¼1 ¼ C1 x2 ; QIL1 ¼ ¼ i¼1 ¼
@L1 @L1 @L1 R1 @L1 R1
FL1 ¼ 2 ½ðPRL1 PR þ PIL1 PI Þ ðQRL1 QR þ QIL1 QI Þ;
X
3
1
FL1 ¼ 2 x2 ½C1 ð Li Þ fC12 x2 þ g
i¼1
R21
P
3
x ½C1 ð
Li Þ fC12 x2 þ R12 g
FL1 i¼1 1
xL1 ¼ ¼ 3
Fx P P3
ð Li Þ ½2 C1 ð Li Þ f2 C12 x2 þ 1
R21
g
i¼1 i¼1
2 P2 U x L1 þ V @Re k 1
KðL1 Þ ¼ Fx ðs2 xL1 þ Þ; signð Þ jk¼ix
þ4 V
FL21 2 P 2 @L1
¼ sign KðL1 Þ
U xL1 þ V
sign KðL1 Þ ¼ signðFx Þ signðs2 xL1 þ Þ
P2
Our switching analysis results are the same if we move from L1 parameter to L2
or to L3 since the partial derivatives are the same.
Summary: We take the assumption that Vi(t) is an incoming signal width
Dt\s1 ; s2 ; Dt ! e. There are three time intervals which we analyze our power
limiter microstrip line system. The first time interval is s1 [ t [ 0, the coming
signal not yet pass the first delay line ðs1 Þ and VA, V, Vout respectively equal to
zero. The second time interval is s1 þ s2 [ t
s1 , the signal has not yet passed the
second delay line ðs2 Þ and mutual interaction between the signal and power limiter
equivalent circuit gives V(t) which is the voltage on resistor R1 and capacitor C1.
The dynamical analysis is done by using forced Van der Pol equation. The forcing
signal X(t) is the coming RF signal. The third time interval is t
s1 þ s2 , the
incoming signal passes both the first and second delay lines and the dynamical
170 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
behavior analysis is done by using Delay Differential Equation (DDE) and stability
switching analysis. For simplicity, we consider Vout ! e after s1 + s2 second.
In our analysis we consider the incoming RF signal to power limiter input
circuit, has time interval Dt. We choose Dt, Dt\s1 ; s2 . The incoming RF signal
time interval is less than delay lines times s1 ; s2 . First the incoming RF signal cause
to the voltage V (on shunt mounted limiter equivalent circuit’s R1, C1 elements).
The analysis is based on the Van der Pol’s equation. Second, we analyze output
voltage according to Delay Differential Equation (DDE), V is the main equation
variable in time [39–41] (Fig. 2.3).
Power limiter with microstrip transmission line system stability switching
analysis is done according geometric stability switch criteria [BK] in delay differ-
ential system with delay dependent variables. The first analysis is a power limiter
microstrip system with incoming RF signal. By using Van der Pol topology we find
V(t) voltage after s1 . The second analysis is power limiter microstrip system output
Vin
Incoming Incoming RF
RF signal Signal after first delay line
V t
Vo t [sec]
V t
DD
Van Der
Pol
Fig. 2.3 Shunt mounted limiter diode equivalent circuit with microstrip lines delayed time
diagram
2.1 Microstrip Transmission Lines Delayed in Time Power … 171
differential equation with delay variable in time Vðt s2 Þ. V is the power limiter
equivalent circuit’s voltage on R1 and C1 . For the second analysis, we find out
system general characteristic equation Dðk; s2 Þ. Find Fðx; s2 Þ for each s2 has at
most a finite number of real zeros. Find x; s2 values which fulfill Fðx; s2 Þ ¼ 0;
xðs2 Þ, only for those values can be stability switching (first condition). Next is to
find those x; s2 values which fulfill the expressions, it is the second condition for
stability switching sinðx s2 Þ ¼ . . . cosðx s2 Þ ¼ . . .. If K(R1) > 0, K(C1) > 0,
K(Li) > 0 then the crossing proceeds from “−” to “+” respectively (stable to
unstable). If K(R1) < 0, K(C1) < 0, K(Li) < 0 then the crossing proceeds from “+”
to “−” respectively (unstable to stable). The analysis consists in identifying the
roots of microstrip power limiter circuit characteristic equation P(k) + Q(k) exp
(−k s2) = 0 situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k—plane, where, by
increasing the circuit parameters R1, C1, Li. Rek may, at the crossing, change its
sign from “−” to “+”, i.e. from a stable focus V* to an unstable one, or vice versa.
This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives
with respect to microstrip power limiter circuit parameters R1, C1, Li.
Active circulator consisting of three ports, namely P1, P2 and P3. Active circulator is
a three terminal device in which input from one port is transmitted to the next port
in rotation. The active circulator acts as an isolator between the input and the output
signal so that phase shift is well observed. The RF input signal is given at P1 of the
circulator from the left side. This signal from P1 is transmitted to P2. We can
connect LC (L1, C1) components in series to P2 port which results in phase shift and
helps to reflect the signal to P3 at the right. At P3 we get an output RF signal. Each
active circulator terminal faces a delay parasitic effect of signal transferring in time
[25, 26, 35] (Fig. 2.4).
Our circuit is a Reflection Type Phase Shifter (RTPS), employing a circulator. In
the past was little interest in actively circulators since its narrow bandwidth and
problems associated with a hybrid realization. We use active circulators since their
bandwidths have increased considerably as a result of the advances in transistor
technology. Active circulators are ideally suited for realization using MMIC tech-
nology. The circuit employs decade bandwidth active circulator which shows very
low phase error characteristic. Additionally the phase shifter exhibits an excellent
input return loss performance across this decade bandwidth. The circuit configu-
ration of the active circulator used three MESFETs which are the GEC-Marconi
standard library cell F20-FET-4x75. As with all the standard library cells, a very
accurate, ultra-wideband small signal models of the device. MESFET stands for
metal semiconductor field effect transistor. It is similar to a JFET in construction
172 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
and terminology. The difference is that instead of using a p-n junction for the gate, a
Schottky (metal semiconductor) junction is used. A typical three ports decade
bandwidth active circulator has three MESFETs transistors interconnected with
each other. RF, CF, LF, CC, Rsb plays a major role in the working of the circuit. The
three feedback branches (RF, CF, LF) are used to link all the three transistors in an
end to end fashion. The source resistor (Rsb) is shared among all the three
MESFETs transistors and one transistor is source coupled with the other two
transistors using this source resistor. The circuit works in a symmetric fashion. We
consider MESFET high frequency model taking node capacitors into account.
Figure 2.5 describes the circuit configuration of the active circulator [35, 36].
In Fig. 2.5 we use N-type MESFET but usually the recommended is a sym-
metrical bilateral MESFET. All Cc and Cf capacitors are un-polarized. Once we
inject RF signal to port P1, it passes to port P2 through a feedback branch (RF, CF,
LF). The same is between ports P2 and P3, ports P3 and P1. In case we inject RF signal
to port P2, it reaches the Q1 gate and shorten the Q1’s drain and source. Then Port 2’s
RF signal is shortened to ground through resistor Rsb and didn’t reach port P1.
d 1 1
½Vcf þ Vcc ¼ I1 ½ þ ; V1 V2 ¼ Vcf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC ;
dt Cf Cc
dI1
Vcf þ Vcc ¼ V1 V2 Lf I1 Rf
dt
d dV1 dV2 d 2 I1 dI1
½Vcf þ Vcc ¼ Lf 2 Rf ;
dt dt dt dt dt
1 1 dV1 dV2 d 2 I1 dI1
I1 ½ þ ¼ Lf 2 Rf
Cf Cc dt dt dt dt
dVc1 dVc1
Second branch: I2 ¼ C1 dt ; VL1 ¼ L1 dIdt2 ; Vc1 ¼ V2 L1 dIdt2 ; I2 ¼ C1 dt
2
¼ C1 ½dV
dt L1 dt2 .
2 d I2
174 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
dVcf
Third branch: I3 ¼ Cf dt ; VLf ¼ Lf dIdt3 ; I3 ¼ Cc dVdtcc
d 1 1
½Vc þ Vcc ¼ I3 ½ þ ; V2 V3 ¼ Vcf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC ;
dt f Cf Cc
dI3
Vcf þ Vcc ¼ V2 V3 Lf I3 Rf
dt
d dV2 dV3 d 2 I3 dI3
½Vcf þ Vcc ¼ Lf 2 Rf ;
dt dt dt dt dt
1 1 dV2 dV3 d 2 I3 dI3
I3 ½ þ ¼ Lf 2 Rf
Cf Cc dt dt dt dt
1 1 dV1 dV2 d 2 I1 dI1 dV2 d 2 I2
I1 þ ¼ Lf 2 Rf ; I2 ¼ C1 L1 2
Cf Cc dt dt dt dt dt dt
1 1 dV2 d 2 I3 dI3
I3 þ ¼ ðLf þ La þ Lt Þ 2 ðRf þ Ra Þ
Cf Cc dt dt dt
dV2 d 2 I2 dV2 1 d 2 I2
I2 ¼ C1 L1 2 ) ¼ I 2 þ L1 2
dt dt dt C1 dt
1 1 dV1 1 d 2 I2 d 2 I1 dI1
I1 ½ þ ¼ I2 L1 2 Lf 2 Rf
Cf Cc dt C1 dt dt dt
1 1 1 d 2 I2 d 2 I3 dI3
I3 ½ þ ¼ I2 þ L1 2 ðLf þ La þ Lt Þ 2 ðRf þ Ra Þ
Cf Cc C1 dt dt dt
1 1 dV1 1 1 d 2 I1 d 2 I3
I1 ½ þ ¼ I1 þ I 3 L1 2 þ L 1 2
Cf Cc dt C1 C1 dt dt
d 2 I1 dI1
Lf Rf
dt2 dt
1 1 1 1 d 2 I1
I3 ½ þ ¼ I1 I 3 þ L1 2
Cf Cc C1 C1 dt
d 2 I3 dI3
ðLf þ La þ Lt þ L1 Þ ðRf þ Ra Þ
dt2 dt
dI1 dI3 d 2 I1 dI 0 d 2 I3 dI 0
¼ I10 ; ¼ I30 ; 2 ¼ 1 ; 2 ¼ 3
dt dt dt dt dt dt
1 1 1 dV1 1 dI 0 dI 0
I1 ½ þ þ ¼ þ I3 þ L1 3 ðLf þ L1 Þ 1 I10 Rf
Cf Cc C1 dt C1 dt dt
1 1 1 1 dI 0 dI 0
I3 ½ þ þ ¼ I1 þ L1 1 ðLf þ La þ Lt þ L1 Þ 3 I30 ðRf þ Ra Þ;
Cf Cc C1 C1 dt dt
dI1 dI
¼ I10 ; ¼ I30
3
dt dt
dV1 1 dI 0 dI 0
I1 C R ¼ þ I3 þ L1 3 ðLf þ L1 Þ 1 I10 Rf ; I3 CR
dt C1 dt dt
1 dI10 dI30 dI1 dI3
¼ I 1 þ L1 LR I30 ðRf þ Ra Þ; ¼ I10 ; ¼ I30
C1 dt dt dt dt
dI10 dI30
From the above differential equation, we get the expressions for dt and dt :
1 ðLRLC
1
CR Þ ðC11 L1LCR R Þ
C0 ¼ ; C1 ¼ 1
; C2 ¼ ;
fLf þ L1 ð1 LLR1 Þg fLf þ L1 ð1 LLR1 Þg fLf þ L1 ð1 LLR1 Þg
Rf L1 ðRf þ Ra Þ
C3 ¼ ; C4 ¼
fLf þ L1 ð1 LLR1 Þg fLf þ L1 ð1 LLR1 Þg
dI10 dV1
¼ C0 þ C1 I1 þ C2 I3 þ C3 I10 þ C4 I30
dt dt
dI30 dV1 L1 C0 1 L1 C1 L1 C2 CR
¼ þ½ þ I1 þ ½ I3
dt dt LR LR C1 LR LR LR
L1 C3 0 L1 C4 ðRf þ Ra Þ 0
þ I1 þ ½ I3
LR LR LR
dI30 dV1 L1 C0 1 1 1 L1 C3
¼ þ ½ þ L1 C1 I1 þ ½L1 C2 CR I3 þ
dt dt LR LR C1 LR LR
1
I10 þ ½L1 C4 ðRf þ Ra Þ I30
LR
L1 C0 1 1 1
C5 ¼ ; C6 ¼ ½ þ L1 C1 ; C7 ¼ ½L1 C2 CR ;
LR LR C1 LR
L1 C3 1
C8 ¼ ; C9 ¼ ½L1 C4 ðRf þ Ra Þ
LR LR
dI30 dV1
¼ C5 þ C6 I1 þ C7 I3 þ C8 I10 þ C9 I30
dt dt
dI10 dV1 dI 0
¼ C0 þ C1 I1 þ C2 I3 þ C3 I10 þ C4 I30 ; 3
dt dt dt
dV1 0 0
¼ C5 þ C6 I1 þ C7 I3 þ C8 I1 þ C9 I3
dt
We have four system variables: I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 and coming RFin signal V1(t). We
can write the above system, differential equations in a form of matrix representa-
tion: C5 ¼ LLR1 C0
0 1
dI1
B dt C
B C
B C 0 1 0 I1 1 0 0 1
B dI3 C !11 . . . !14
B C BI C B0 C
B dt C B . .. C dV1 ðtÞ
B C B .. C B 3C B C
B dI 0 C ¼@ .. . . AB C þ B C C0
@ I10 A @ 1 A
; !11 ¼ 0;
B 1C dt
B C !41 !44
B dt C I0 L1
B C 3 LR
@ dI A
0
3
dt
!12 ¼ 0; !13 ¼ 1; !14 ¼ 0; !21 ¼ 0; !22 ¼ 0
We consider RFin signal V1(t) = A0 + f(t); |f(t)| <= 1 and A0 |f(t)| then
V1 ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ f ðtÞ A0 ) dVdt1 ðtÞ ! e. We can write our matrix representation:
e!0
0 1
dI1
B dt C 0 1
B C
B dI3 C 0 1 I1
B C !11 . . . !14 BI C
B dt C B . .. .. C B 3 C
B C
B dI 0 C ¼ @ .. . . AB Cþe
@ I10 A
B 1C
B dt C !41 !44
B C
@ dI 0 A I30
3
dt
Due to active circulator’s micro strip transmission line delays s1 in the first
port’s current and s3 for the third port current. Accordingly, active circulator’s
micro strip transmission lines, delays D1 for the first port current derivative and D3
for the third port current derivative. I1 ðtÞ ! I1 ðt s1 Þ; I3 ðtÞ ! I3 ðt s3 Þ
I10 ðtÞ ! I10 ðt D1 Þ; I30 ðtÞ ! I30 ðt D3 Þ. We consider no delay effect on
0 0
dI1 dI3 dI1 dI3
dt ; dt ; dt ; dt .
Active circulator’s micro strip transmission lines parasitic effects
influence only on P1 and P3 current and current derivatives I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 (I2 ; I20 which
are a hidden variable in our analysis).
178 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
0 1
dI1
B dt C 0 1
B C
B dI3 C 0 1 I1 ðt s1 Þ
B C !11 . . . !14 B C
B dt C B . .. .. C B I3 ðt s3 Þ C
B C¼@ .
B dI 0 C . . . AB Cþe
@ I10 ðt D1 Þ A
B 1C
B dt C ! 41 !44
B C
@ dI 0 A I30 ðt D3 Þ
3
dt
We get four equations and the only one fixed point is C7 C6CC1 2 6¼ 0
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the active circulator system consists in adding to coordinate
½I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 ekt , and
retaining the first order terms in ½I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 . The system of four homogeneous
equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues k. The
polynomial characteristics equations accept by set the below currents and currents
derivative respect to time into active circulator system equations. Active circulator
system fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third
fixed point), etc.,
We choose the above expressions for our I1 ðtÞ; I3 ðtÞ and I10 ðtÞ; I30 ðtÞ as a small
displacement ½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 from the active circulator system fixed points at time
ðjÞ ðjÞ 0 ðjÞ
t = 0. I1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i1 ; I3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i3 ; I10 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i01 ; I30 ðt ¼ 0Þ
0 ðjÞ
¼ I3 þ i03 .
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 179
ðiÞ ðiÞ
dI1 ðtÞ I1 ðt þ DtÞ I1 ðtÞ I þ i1 ekðt þ DtÞ ½I1 þ i1 ekt
¼ lim ¼ lim 1
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
i1 ekt ½ekDt 1 ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ lim ! k i1 ekt
Dt!0 Dt
dI3 ðtÞ dI 0 ðtÞ dI 0 ðtÞ
¼ k i3 ekt ; 1 ¼ k i01 ekt ; 3 ¼ k i03 ekt
dt dt dt
dI1 ðt s1 Þ dI ðt s Þ
¼ k i1 ekt eks1 ; ¼ k i3 ekt eks3
3 3
dt dt
dI10 ðt D1 Þ dI 0 ðt D1 Þ
¼ k i01 ekt ekD1 ; 3 ¼ k i03 ekt ekD3
dt dt
First, we take the active circulator’s currents I1, I3 differential equations: dIdt1 ¼
I10 ; dIdt3 ¼ I30 and adding coordinates ½I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 arbitrarily small increments of
exponential terms ½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 ekt and retaining the first order terms in i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 .
I10 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
0ðiÞ
I1 I10 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ i01 ejkjt
I30 ðt ! 1Þ ¼
0ðiÞ
I3 I30 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ i3 ejkjt
180 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
0 ðiÞ 0 ði¼0Þ
k i1 ekt ¼ I1 þ i01 ekt ; I1 ¼ 0 ) k i1 þ i01 ¼ 0
0 ðiÞ 0 ði¼0Þ
k i3 ekt ¼ I3 þ i03 ekt ; I3 ¼ 0 ) k i3 þ i03 ¼ 0
Second, we take the active circulator’s currents derivative I10 ; I30 differential
equations:
dI10 dV1 dI 0
¼ C0 þ C1 I1 þ C2 I3 þ C3 I10 þ C4 I30 ; 3
dt dt dt
dV1 0 0
¼ C5 þ C6 I1 þ C7 I3 þ C8 I1 þ C9 I3
dt
0 0
dV1
dt C0 ! e; dV dt C5 ! e and adding coordinates ½I1 ; I3 ; I1 ; I3 arbitrarily small
1
increments of exponential terms ½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 ekt and retaining the first order terms
in i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 .
ðjÞ ðjÞ 0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
k i01 ekt ¼ C1 ðI1 þ i1 ekt Þ þ C2 ðI3 þ i3 ekt Þ þ C3 ðI1 þ i01 ekt Þ þ C4 ðI3 þ i03 ekt Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ 0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
k i03 ekt ¼ C6 ðI1 þ i1 ekt Þ þ C7 ðI3 þ i3 ekt Þ þ C8 ðI1 þ i01 ekt Þ þ C9 ðI3 þ i03 ekt Þ
ðj¼0Þ ðj¼0Þ 0ðj¼0Þ 0ðj¼0Þ
I1 ¼ 0 ; I3 ¼ 0 ; I1 ¼ 0 ; I3 ¼0
ðk þ C3 Þ i01 þ C1 i1 þ C2 i3 þ C4 i03 ¼ 0 ; ðk þ C9 Þ i03 þ C6 i1 þ C7 i3 þ C8 i01 ¼ 0
ferential equations with respect to coordinates ½I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 arbitrarily small incre-
dI10 dI30
ments of exponential ½i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 ekt . We consider no delay effect on dIdt1 ; dIdt3 ; dt ; dt
and get the following equations:
k þ q2 ðsÞ k þ . . ..
2
The case we analyze is when there is a delay in I1 and I3 currents only. The delay
is the same for I1 and I3 and equal to s (s1 ¼ s; s3 ¼ s) which describe most of
active circulator parasitic effects. The general characteristic equation D(k, s) is as
follow: Dðs1 ¼ s3 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0; kÞ
182 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
Dðs1 ¼ s3 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼ Dðs; kÞ
¼ k4 k3 ðC3 þ C9 Þ þ k2 ðC3 C9 C8 C4 Þ þ fk2 ðC7 þ C1 Þ
þ k ðC1 C9 C6 C4 C2 C8 þ C7 C3 Þ
þ ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ eks g eks
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ kk ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ k þ P2 ðsÞ k2 þ P3 ðsÞ k3 þ P4 ðsÞ k4
k¼0
¼ k2 ðC3 C9 C8 C4 Þ k3 ðC3 þ C9 Þ þ k4
P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0; P2 ðsÞ ¼ C3 C9 C8 C4 ; P3 ðsÞ ¼ ðC3 þ C9 Þ;
P4 ðsÞ ¼ 1
Pm
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ k¼0 qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ k
þ q2 ðsÞ k2 :
X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ k2 ðC7 þ C1 Þ
k¼0
þ k ½C1 C9 C6 C4 C2 C8 þ C7 C3 s ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ
þ C1 C7 C6 C2
q0 ðsÞ ¼ C1 C7 C6 C2 ;
q1 ðsÞ ¼ C1 C9 C6 C4 C2 C8 þ C7 C3 s ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ;
q2 ðsÞ ¼ ðC7 þ C1 Þ
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 183
The homogeneous system for I1 ; I3 ; I10 ; I30 leads to a characteristic equation for the
P
eigenvalue k having the form Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ 4j¼0 aj k j ; QðkÞ ¼
P2
j¼0 cj k and the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R depend on qi ; qk and
j
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0 ;
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x4 x2 ðC3 C9 C8 C4 Þ i x3 ðC3 þ C9 Þ
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x2 ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ i x ½C1 C9 C6 C4 C2 C8 þ C7 C3
s ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ þ C1 C7 C6 C2
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x4 þ x2 fC7 þ C1 C3 C9 þ C8 C4 g
þ C1 C7 C6 C2 þ i x fC1 C9 C6 C4 C2 C8
þ C7 C3 s ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ x2 ðC3 þ C9 Þg 6¼ 0
jPði x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6 fðC3 þ C9 Þ2 2 ðC3 C9 C8 C4 Þg
þ x4 ðC3 C9 C8 C4 Þ4
X ¼ XðCj ; s ; 1 j 9Þ ¼ C1 C9 C6 C4 C2 C8 þ C7 C3
s ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x2 ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ
þ i x XðCj ; s ; 1 j 9Þ
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x2 ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ C1 C7 C6 C2 þ i x X
jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ x4 ðC7 þ C1 Þ2 þ x2 fX2 þ 2 ðC7 þ C1 Þ ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þg
þ ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ2
P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 U2k x
2k
¼ 0 and its roots are given
by solving the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x4 x2
ðC3 C9 C8 C4 Þ
Hence
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
P
Which jointly with Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 ) 4k¼0 U2k x2k ¼ 0 that is a continuous and
differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use Theorem 1.2. This proves the
Theorem 1.3.
Our active circulator homogeneous system for i1 ; i3 ; i01 ; i03 leads to a characteristic
equation for the eigenvalue k having the form P ðkÞ þ Q ðkÞ eks = 0; First case
s1 ¼ s ; s3 ¼ s ; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0. The general characteristic equation D(k, s) is as
follow: Dðs1 ¼ s3 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D3 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼ Dðs; kÞ
Pk ¼ k2 ðC3 C9 C8 C4 Þ k3 ðC3 þ C9 Þ þ k4
Qk ¼ k2 ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ k ½C1 C9 C6 C4 C2 C8 þ C7 C3
s ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ þ C1 C7 C6 C2
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ C3 C9 C8 C4 ; a3 ¼ (C3 þ C9 ); a4 ¼ 1
c0 ¼ C1 C7 C6 C2 ; c1 ¼ ½C1 C9 C6 C4 C2 C8 þ C7 C3
s ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ; c2 ¼ ðC7 þ C1 Þ
ðLRLC
1
CR Þ L1R ½L1 C2 CR 1
½C11 þ L1 C1 ðC11 L1LCR R Þ
1
LR 6¼ 0
fLf þ L1 ð1 LLR1 Þg fLf þ L1 ð1 LLR1 Þg
ðLRLC
1
CR Þ L1R ½L1 C2 CR L1R ½C11 þ L1 C1 ðC11 L1LCR R Þ
1
6¼ 0
fLf þ L1 ð1 LLR1 Þg
@ Re k
^1 ðLf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Lf k¼ix
@Re k
^1 ðCf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Lf ; Cc ; Rsb ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Cf k¼ix
@ Re k
^1 ðCc Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Rsb ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Cc k¼ix
@ Re k
^1 ðRsb Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; s; . . . ¼ const
@Rsb k¼ix
@ Re k
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; . . . ¼ const ; x 2 R þ :
@s k¼ix
X ¼ XðCj ; s; 1 j 9Þ ¼ C1 C9 C6 C4 C2 C8 þ C7 C3
s ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x2 ðx2 C3 C9 þ C8 C4 Þ; PI ði x; sÞ ¼ x3 ðC3 þ C9 Þ
QR ði x; sÞ ¼ x2 ðC7 þ C1 Þ þ ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ; QI ði x; sÞ
¼ x X ðCj ; s; 1 j 9Þ ¼ x X
U0 ¼ ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þ2 ; U2 ¼ fX2 þ 2 ðC7 þ C1 Þ ðC1 C7 C6 C2 Þg
U4 ¼ ðC3 C9 C8 C4 Þ4 ðC7 þ C1 Þ2 ; U6 ¼ ðC3 þ C9 Þ2
2 ðC3 C9 C8 C4 Þ ; U8 ¼ 1
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2
X
4
¼ U0 þ U2 x2 þ U4 x4 þ U6 x6 þ U8 x8 ¼ U2k x2k
k¼0
188 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 U2k x
2k
¼ 0. When writing PðkÞ ¼
PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼ i x into active
circulator system’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin x s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos x s ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ s for xðsÞ s must be
xðsÞ s ¼ hðsÞ þ n 2 p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ
þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R ;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that is a continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; . . . indicate the corresponding
partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on ^ðxÞ, remember in kðRf ; Lf ; Cf ;
Cc ; Rsb ; . . .Þ and xðRf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; . . .Þ, and keeping all parameters except one
(x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiating
active circulator characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks = 0 with respect to
specific parameter (x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates.
Remark: x ¼ Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; . . .; etc:;
where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i x, and bearing i Pði xÞ ¼ Pði xÞ,
Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ then i Pk ði xÞ ¼ Px ði xÞ; i Qk ði xÞ ¼ Qx ði xÞ and
that on the surface jPði xÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 , one obtains
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 189
@Re k @x Fs
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; ¼ xs ¼ ;
@s k¼ix @s Fx
2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g
Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@s k¼ix
@x U @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g signfs þxþ g
@s jPj2
@ Re k
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Rf ; Lf ; Cf ; Cc ; Rsb ; . . . ¼ const ; x 2 R þ :
@s k¼ix
For our stability switching analysis, we choose typical active circulator param-
eter values: Rf = 110 Ohm, Lf = 1.4 nH, Cf = 5 pF, Cc = 10 pF, Rsb = 115 Ohm,
MESFET (F20-FET-4x75), L1 = 5 nH, C1 = 5 pF, La = 1.6 nH, Ra = 500 Ohm,
Lt = 7 nH, LR = 15 nH. LR ¼ Lf þ La þ Lt þ L1 ¼ 1:4 nH þ 1:6 nH þ 7 nH þ
5 nH ¼ 15 nH:
1 1 1 1 1 1
CR ¼ þ þ ¼ þ þ ¼ 5 1011 ;
Cf Cc C1 5 1012 10 1012 5 1012
L1
C0 ¼ 2:11 108 ; C1 ¼ C0 ð CR Þ ¼ 9:14 1019
LR C1
1 L1 CR
C2 ¼ C0 ð Þ ¼ 0:703 1019 ; C3 ¼ C0 Rf ¼ 232:1 108 ;
C1 LR
L1 C0
C4 ¼ C0 L1 ðRf þ Ra Þ ¼ 643:55; C5 ¼ ¼ 0:7 108
LR
1 1 1
C6 ¼ ½ þ L1 C1 ¼ 0:171 1020 ; C7 ¼ ½L1 C2 CR ¼ 3 1019 ;
LR C1 LR
L1 C3 1
C8 ¼ ¼ 77:36 108 ; C9 ¼ ½L1 C4 ðRf þ Ra Þ ’ 40:6 109
LR LR
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 191
Then we get the expression for Fðx; sÞ for an active circulator parameter’s
value. We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,
complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001::10. And we
can be express by 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We plot the stability switch diagram
based on different delay values of our active circulator system.
@ Re k 2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@s Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
@ Re k 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally When all active circulator’s parameters
are known and the stability switch due to various time delay values s is described in
the following expression:
Remark: We know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies its roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values, which xi are complex or imag-
inary numbered, then unable to analyze stability [6, 7].
We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,
complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001::10 and we
can be express by 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We define new MATLAB script
parameters: s!Tau, Ci!Gi (i=0..9), X!Omega, Uj!Phij. Running MATLAB
script for s values (s 2 ½0:001::10) gives the following results.
MATLAB script: Tau=0.1;G0=2.11e8;G1=-9.14e19; G2=0.703e19;
G3=-232.1e8;G4=-643.55;G5=0.7e8;G6=-0.171e20;G7=-3e19;G8=-77.36e8;G9=-
40.6e9; Omega=G1*G9-G6*G4-G2*G8+G7*G3-Tau*(G1*G7-G6*G2);Phi0=-
(G1*G7-G6*G2)^2; Phi2=-(Omega^2+2*(G7+G1)*(G1*G7 G6*G2)); Phi4=
(G3*G9-G8*G4)^4-(G7+G1)^2; Phi6=(G3+G9)^2-2*(G3*G9-G8*G4);Phi8=1; p=
[Phi8 0 Phi6 0 Phi4 0 Phi2 0 Phi0];r=roots(p).
Results: (Table 2.2).
We plot 3D function Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. s:0!10; x:0!1e20. We define additional
MATLAB script parameters x!w, s!t (Fig. 2.8).
We get two possible real values for x which fulfil Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 ; Fðx ¼ 0 or x ¼
1:0e þ 020; sÞ ¼ 0 s 2 ½0:001::10. Next is to find those x, s values which fulfil
sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .
192 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
PR QI þ PI QR
sinðx sÞ ¼ and cos hðsÞ ¼ . . .
jQj2
ðPR QR þ PI QI Þ
cosðx sÞ ¼ ; jQj2 ¼ Q2R þ Q2I
jQj2
@ Re k 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
gðsÞ ¼ ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
@ Re k
sign ½gðsÞ ¼ sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ sign½ð Þ
@s k¼ix
2 fFx ðV þ x P Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
2
¼ sign½
Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
Fs
sign½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx ½ðV þ x P2 Þ ðU þ s P2 Þg ;
Fx
Fs @x @F=@x
xs ¼ ; xs ¼ ð Þ1 ¼
Fx @s @F=@s
sign ½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx ½V þ xs U þ x P2 þ xs s P2 g ;
1 V þ xs U
sign ½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx ½ 2 ½ þ x þ xs sg
P P2
1 V þ xs U
sign ½ 2 [ 0 ) sign ½^1 ðsÞ ¼ signf½Fx ½ þ x þ xs sg
P P2
V þ xs U
sign ½^1 ðsÞ ¼ sign½Fx sign ½ þ x þ xs s;
P2
Fx ¼ 2 ½ðPRx PR þ PIx PI Þ ðQRx QR þ QIx QI Þ
We check the sign of ^1 ðsÞ according the following rule (Table 2.3).
Table 2.3 Active circulator sign ½Fx sign½V þPx2 s U þ x þ xs s sign ½^1 ðsÞ
stability switching criteria
± ± +
±
–
194 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
If sign[K−1(s)] > 0 then the crossing proceeds from (−) to (+) respectively
(stable to unstable). If sign[K−1(s)] < 0 then the crossing proceeds from (+) to (−)
respectively (unstable to stable). Anyway the stability switching can occur only for
x = 1.0e + 020 and s 2 ½0:001::10. Since it is a very complex function, we rec-
ommend to solve it numerically rather than analytic. We plot the stability switch
diagram based on different delay values of our active circulator system.
We consider Active circulator which connects in a configuration of Reflection
Type Phase Shifter (RTPS) circuit. Due to the parasitic effect, there is a delay in
time for current which flow in and out Active circulator ports. This delay causes to
stability switching for our Active circulator system. We draw our Active circulator
(RTPS) equivalent circuit and get system differential equations. Our variables are
first and third ports currents and currents derivative. Our system dynamic behavior
is dependent on circuit overall parameters and parasitic delay in time. We keep all
circuit parameters fix and change, parasitic delay over various values
s 2 ½0:001::10. Our analysis results extend that of in the way that it deals with
stability switching for different delay values. This implies that our system behavior
of the circuit cannot inspect by short analysis and we must study the full system.
Several very important issues and possibilities were left out of the present analysis.
One possibility is the stability switching by circuit parameters. Every circuit’s
parameter variation can change our system dynamic and stability behavior. This
case can be solved by the same methods combined with alternative and more
technical hypotheses. Moreover, numerical simulations for the active circulator
model studied in references suggest that this result can be extended to enhance
models with more general functions. Still another extension of our results would be
to treat the case of delayed Active circulator’s port currents derivative in time
dI1 ðtD1 Þ dI3 ðtD3 Þ
dt ; dt ; D1 [ 0 ; D3 [ 0 [5, 6]. It would be extremely desirable to con-
firm these cases by mathematical proofs. Active circulator transmission lines are
characterized by parasitic effects which can influence active circulator system sta-
bility in time. There are four main active circulator variables which are affected by
transmission lines parasitic effects, first and third branch currents and currents
derivatives respectively. Each active circulator currents variable under transmission
line parasitic effects is characterized by time delay respectively. The two time
delays are not the same, but can be categorized to some sub cases due to inter-
ferences behavior. The first case we analyze is when there is delay in active cir-
culator first and third branches current and no delay in active circulator first and
third branches current derivative. The second case we analyze is when there is delay
in active circulator first and third branches current derivative and no delay in active
circulator first and third branches current [6, 7]. The third case we analyze is when
there is delay in active circulator first and third branches current and also delay in
active circulator first and third branches current derivative.
2.2 Three Ports Active Circulator’s Reflection Type Phase Shifter … 195
d Re k dSn ðsÞ
dðs Þ ¼ signf j
g ¼ signfFx ðxðs Þ; s Þg signf j g
ds k¼ixðs Þ ds s¼s
Theorem 1.3 The characteristic equation has a pair of simple and conjugate pure
imaginary roots k ¼ xðs Þ; xðs Þ real at s 2 I if Sn ðs Þ ¼ s sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for
some n 2 N0 . If xðs Þ ¼ x þ ðs Þ, this pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary
roots crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if d þ ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the
imaginary axis from right to left if d þ ðs Þ\ 0 where d þ ðs Þ ¼ sign
dSn ðsÞ
fd Re k
ds jk¼ix þ ðs Þ g ¼ signf ds js¼s g. If xðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ, this pair of simple con-
jugate pure imaginary roots crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if
d ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from right to left If d ðs Þ\0 where
dSn ðsÞ
d ðs Þ ¼ signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix ðs Þ g ¼ signf ds js¼s g.
If x ðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ then Dðs Þ ¼ 0 and signfdRek j
þ ds g ¼ 0, the same is
k¼ixðs Þ
true when S0n ðs Þ ¼ 0. The following result can be useful in identifying values of s
Where stability switches happened.
196 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
In this subchapter, Very Critical and useful subject is discussed: cylindrical (closed)
RF network antennas for coupled plasma sources copper legs delayed in time. The
resonant RF networks can be arranged to form large-area or large-volume plasma
sources with properties similar to Inductive Coupled Plasma (ICP) devices. There
are medical applications of Birdcage coils and closed and open configurations of the
antenna for plasma production are possible and can be analyzed by using mathe-
matical formulation. There are systems of an open network antenna as a large-area
planar plasma source and of a closed network antenna as a cylindrical plasma
source. Both are composed of similar electrical meshes. Operation at different
normal modes shows the capability of this antenna type of large-volume plasma
applications [86].
An important issue of proper antenna operation is the location of the RF feeding
and grounding connections on the antenna. There are a large number of different RF
antenna arrangements possible in view of the geometry and RF operation and of
plasma obtained. In our analysis, we investigated only cylindrical RF antenna
which built following a high-pass Birdcage coil. The antenna is mounted outside a
glass tube. The RF antenna consists of 16 copper legs (Fig. 2.9), equally spaced
interconnected with capacitors, each copper leg current has parasitic time delayed
(s1–1 … s1–16). We consider for simplicity that all copper legs parasitic time delayed
are equal (s1–1 = s1–2 = = s1–16) and the voltages on delay units (Ve ) are
neglected Ve ! e. There is a delay in each Copper leg current
I1 ðt s11 Þ; . . .; I16 ðt s116 Þ. We consider all interconnected capacitor values are
the same (C) and all antenna elements inductance values are the same (L). CA1 ¼
CA2 ¼ ¼ CA16 ¼ C ; CB1 ¼ CB2 ¼ ¼ CB16 ¼ CL1 ¼ L2 ¼ ¼ L16 ¼ L ;
τk
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 197
IL1 ¼ I1 ; IL2 ¼ I2 ; . . .; IL16 ¼ I16 : We choose first case: antenna network is fed by
the transmitter unit (S1 = OFF, no direct RF feeding). The upper view of 16-leg
cylindrical RF antenna network described in Fig. 2.10.
The lower view of 16-leg cylindrical RF antenna network described in Fig. 2.11.
Cylindrical RF network antenna system can represent as round strip of capacitors
and inductors (Figs. 2.12 and 2.13). The schematic contains RF feeding signal, S1
switch (S1 = ON for direct RF signal feeding, S1 = OFF for RF signal transmitter
feeding). The upper network connecting nodes are A1, A2,…,A16 and the lower
network connecting nodes are B1, B2,…,B16. Antenna copper leg current parasitic
delays are represented by delay units Tau1–1…Tau1–16 (s11 ; . . .; s116 ). Rp is the
parasitic resistance of RF feeding point (A1). The upper system spaced capacitors
are CA1,…,CA16 and the lower system spaced capacitors are CB1,…,CB16.
d d
ICA1 ¼ CA1 ðVA1 VA2 Þ; ICA2 ¼ CA2 ðVA2 VA3 Þ ;
dt dt
d d
ICA3 ¼ CA3 ðVA3 VA4 Þ; . . .; ICA7 ¼ CA7 ðVA7 VA8 Þ
dt dt
dVA8 d
ICA8 ¼ CA8 ; ICAk ¼ CAk ðVAk VAðk þ 1Þ Þ ; k ¼ 1; . . .; 7 ;
dt dt
d d
ICA16 ¼ CA16 ðVA1 VA16 Þ; ICA15 ¼ CA15 ðVA16 VA15 Þ
dt dt
d d
ICA14 ¼ CA14 ðVA15 VA14 Þ; . . .; ICA10 ¼ CA10 ðVA11 VA10 Þ ;
dt dt
dVA10 d
ICA9 ¼ CA9 ; ICAl ¼ CAl ðVAðl þ 1Þ VAl Þ ; l ¼ 10; . . .; 15
dt dt
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 199
d d
ICB1 ¼ CB1 ðVB1 VB2 Þ; ICB2 ¼ CB2 ðVB2 VB3 Þ ; k ¼ 1; . . .; 8 ; ; . . .;
dt dt
d d
ICB8 ¼ CB8 ðVB2 VB3 Þ ; ICBk ¼ CBk ðVBk VBðk þ 1Þ Þ
dt dt
d d
ICB16 ¼ CB16 ðVB1 VB16 Þ; ICB15 ¼ CB15 ðVB16 VB15 Þ ; ; . . .;
dt dt
d
ICB9 ¼ CB9 ðVB10 VB9 Þ
dt
d
ICBl ¼ CBl ðVBðl þ 1Þ VBl Þ ; l ¼ 15; . . .; 9
dt
dIL1 dIL2 dIL3
VA1 VB1 ¼ L1 ; VA2 VB2 ¼ L2 ; VA3 VB3 ¼ L3 ; ; . . .;
dt dt dt
dIL8 dIL9
VA8 VB8 ¼ L8 ; VB9 ¼ L9
dt dt
dIL10 dIL16
VA10 VB10 ¼ L10 ; . . .; VA16 VB16 ¼ L16 ;
dt dt
dILm
VAm VBm ¼ Lm ; m ¼ 1; . . .; 16 ; m 6¼ 9
dt
dIL9
VB9 ¼ L9 ; VA9 ¼ 0 ; A9 ground
dt
1 d 2 IL11 d 2 IL10 1
ðICA10 ICB10 Þ ¼ ; CA10 ¼ CB10 ¼ C ; ðICA15 ICB15 Þ
LC dt2 dt2 LC
d 2 IL16 d 2 IL15
¼ ; CA15 ¼ CB15 ¼ C
dt2 dt2
1 d 2 ILðm þ 1Þ d 2 ILm
ðICAm ICBm Þ ¼ ; m ¼ 10; . . .; 15 ; CA8 ¼ CB8 ¼ C ;
LC dt2 dt2
1 d 2 IL8 d 2 IL9
VA9 ¼ 0 ; ðICA8 ICB8 Þ ¼ þ
LC dt2 dt2
1 d 2 IL9 d 2 IL10
CA9 ¼ CB9 ¼ C ; VA9 ¼ 0 ; ðICA9 ICB9 Þ ¼ þ ;
LC dt2 dt2
1 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL16
CA16 ¼ CB16 ¼ C; VA9 ¼ 0 ; ðICA16 ICB16 Þ ¼
LC dt2 dt2
IR P ¼ ICA16 þ ICA1 þ IL1 ; ICA1 ¼ ICA2 þ IL2 ; ICA2 ¼ ICA3 þ IL3 ;
ICA3 ¼ ICA4 þ IL4 ; ICA4 ¼ ICA5 þ IL5 ; ICA5 ¼ ICA6 þ IL6
ICA6 ¼ ICA7 þ IL7 ; ICA7 ¼ ICA8 þ IL8 ; ICA10 ¼ ICA9 þ IL10 ; ICA11 ¼ ICA10 þ IL11 ;
ICA12 ¼ ICA11 þ IL12 ; ICA13 ¼ ICA12 þ IL13
ICA14 ¼ ICA13 þ IL14 ; ICA15 ¼ ICA14 þ IL15 ; ICA16 ¼ ICA15 þ IL16 ; IL1 ¼ ICB1 þ ICB16 ;
IL9 ¼ ICB8 þ ICB9 ; ICB2 ¼ ICB1 þ IL2
ICB3 ¼ ICB2 þ IL3 ; ICB4 ¼ ICB3 þ IL4 ; ICB5 ¼ ICB4 þ IL5 ; ICB6 ¼ ICB5 þ IL6 ;
ICB7 ¼ ICB6 þ IL7 ; ICB8 ¼ ICB7 þ IL8
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 201
ICB9 ¼ ICB10 þ IL10 ; ICB10 ¼ ICB11 þ IL11 ; ICB11 ¼ ICB12 þ IL12 ; ICB12 ¼ ICB13 þ IL13 ;
ICB13 ¼ ICB14 þ IL14 ; ICB14 ¼ ICB15 þ IL15
ICB15 ¼ ICB16 þ IL16 : S1 is OFF for RF signal transmitter feeding:
IRP ¼ 0 ) ICA16 þ ICA1 þ IL1 ¼ 0
X
8 X
8 X
8
ICA1 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk ; ICA2 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk ; ICA3 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk ;
k¼2 k¼3 k¼4
X
8 X
8 X
8
ICA4 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk ; ICA5 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk ; ICA6 ¼ ICA8 þ ILk
k¼5 k¼6 k¼7
X
16 X
15
ICA7 ¼ ICA8 þ IL8 ; ICA16 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk ; ICA15 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk ;
k¼10 k¼10
X
14 X
13 X
12
ICA14 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk ; ICA13 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk ; ICA12 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk
k¼10 k¼10 k¼10
X
11
ICA11 ¼ ICA9 þ ILk ; ICA10 ¼ ICA9 þ IL10 ;
k¼10
X
16 X
16
ICB1 ¼ IL9 ICB16 ILk ; ICB2 ¼ IL9 ICB16 ILk
k¼2;k6¼9 k¼3;k6¼9
X
16 X
16
ICB3 ¼ IL9 ICB16 ILk ; ICB4 ¼ IL9 ICB16 ILk ;
k¼4;k6¼9 k¼5;k6¼9
X
16 X
16
ICB5 ¼ IL9 ICB16 ILk ; ICB6 ¼ IL9 ICB16 ILk
k¼6;k6¼9 k¼7;k6¼9
X
16 X
16
ICB7 ¼ IL9 ICB16 ILk ; ICB8 ¼ IL9 ICB16 ILk ;
k¼8;k6¼9 k¼10
X
16 X
16
ICB9 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk ; ICB10 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk
k¼10 k¼11
X
16 X
16
ICB11 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk ; ICB12 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk ;
k¼12 k¼13
X
16 X
16
ICB13 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk ; ICB14 ¼ ICB16 þ ILk
k¼14 k¼15
ICB15 ¼ ICB16 þ IL16 ; IL1 ¼ ICB1 þ ICB16 : We get the following additional
expressions:
202 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
2 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL9
½* fðIL2 IL4 Þ þ ðIL6 IL8 Þg ¼ þ 2
LC dt2 dt2
d IL2 d IL4 d 2 IL6 d 2 IL8
2 2
½ 2 2 þ 2
dt dt dt2 dt
2
½** fðIL10 IL12 Þ þ ðIL14 IL16 Þg
LC
d 2 IL1 d 2 IL9 d 2 IL10 d 2 IL12 d 2 IL14 d 2 IL16
¼ 2
þ 2
þ2 ½ 2 þ
dt dt dt dt2 dt2 dt2
2
fIL10 IL12 þ IL14 IL16 þ IL2 IL4 þ IL6 IL8 g
LC
d 2 IL10 d 2 IL12 d 2 IL14 d 2 IL16
¼2½ 2 þ
dt dt2 dt2 dt2
d 2 IL2 d 2 IL4 d 2 IL6 d 2 IL8
þ 2 þ 2
dt2 dt dt2 dt
We define new global variables for our Cylindrical RF network antennas system.
Due to RF antenna copper leg parasitic effect, we get copper leg’s current and
current derivative with delay s1–k and s2–k (k is leg number index, k = 1,…,16). We
consider for simplicity s1–1 = s1–2 = = s1–16; s2–1 = s2–2 = = s2–16.
0
ILk ðtÞ ! ILk ðt s1k Þ ; ILk ðtÞ ¼ dILkdtðtÞ ; ILk
0 0
ðtÞ ! ILk ðt s2k Þ. We consider no
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 203
dI 0 ðtÞ
delay effect on Lkdt . YðtÞ ! Yðt s1 Þ ; XðtÞ ! Xðt s2 Þ: s1 ¼ s11 ¼ s12 ¼
1
¼ s116 s2 ¼ s21 ¼ s22 ¼ ¼ s216 : dYdt ¼ Xðt s2 Þ; dt ¼ LC Yðt s1 Þ.
dX
We get two equations and the only fixed point is E ð0Þ ðY ð0Þ ; X ð0Þ Þ ¼ ð0; 0Þ.
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of Cylindrical RF network antennas system consists in adding to
coordinates [Y X] arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½y x ekt , and
retaining the first order terms in y, x. The system of two homogeneous equations
leads to a polynomial characteristics equation in the eigenvalues k. The polynomial
characteristics equations accept by set the below current and current derivative
respect to time into two Cylindrical RF network antennas system equations.
Cylindrical RF network antennas system fixed values with arbitrarily small incre-
ments of exponential form ½y x ekt are: i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed
point), i = 2 (third fixed point).
We choose the above expressions for our YðtÞ; XðtÞ as small displacement [y x]
from the system fixed points at time t = 0. Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y ; Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼
X ðiÞ þ x for k\0; t [ 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k [ 0; t [ 0 is
Unstable. Our Cylindrical RF network antennas system tend to the selected fixed
point exponentially for k\0; t [ 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed
point exponentially. k is the eigenvalue parameter which establish if the fixed point
is stable or unstable, additionally his absolute value (jkj) establish the speed of flow
toward or away from the selected fixed point [2–6] (Table 2.4).
The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for
Cylindrical RF network antennas system currents and currents derivative respect to
time are
dYðtÞ dXðtÞ
¼ y k ekt ; ¼ x k ekt ;
dt dt
dYðt s1 Þ
¼ y k ekðts1 Þ ¼ y k ekt es1 k
dt
dXðt s2 Þ
¼ x k ekðts2 Þ ¼ x k ekt es2 k
dt
Y ð0Þ ¼ 0 ) k x¼ LC
1
y eks1 . We get the following set of eigenvalues
ks2 1
equations: k y þ x e ¼ 0 ; LC y eks1 k x ¼ 0
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 205
k þ q2 ðsÞ k þ . . .
2
1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ 0; s2 Þ ¼ k2 þ eks2 ¼ k2 þ eks ; Dðk; s1 ; s2 ¼ 0Þ
L C s2 ¼s LC
1 1
¼ k2 þ eks1 js1 ¼s ¼ k2 þ eks
LC LC
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ kk ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ k þ P2 ðsÞ k2 ¼ k2 ; P2 ðsÞ ¼ 1 ;
k¼0
P1 ðsÞ ¼ 0 ; P0 ðsÞ ¼ 0
P
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ m k¼0 qk ðsÞ k ¼ q0 ðsÞ ¼ LC.
k 1
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðkÞ can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is for any real number x; pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0
x2 þ LC1
6¼ 0; Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ ðc x2 Þ2 þ x2 a2
ðx2 b2 þ d 2 Þ
Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4 ðLCÞ
1
2 ; Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies x
4 1
ðLCÞ2
¼ 0 and its roots
pffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
are given by x2þ ¼ 12 fðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ þ Dg ¼ 2D ; x2 ¼ 12 fðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ Dg
pffiffiffi
¼ 2D
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ 4 ðc2 d 2 Þ ¼ L24C2 . Therefore the following holds:
pffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
2 x2 ðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ ¼ D; 2 x2 ¼ D. Furthermore
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ xðsÞ bðsÞ ¼ 0 hence sin hðsÞ ¼ PR ðix;sÞQI ðix;sÞ þ PI ðix;sÞQR ðix;sÞ
jQðix;sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ ;
jQði x; sÞj2
ðc x Þ x b þ x a d
2
sin hðsÞ ¼ ¼0
x 2 b2 þ d 2
1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ eks eks ; Dðk; sÞ
LC
¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ eks
Pn
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k¼0 Pk ðsÞ kk ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ
k þ P2 ðsÞ k2 ¼ k2
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 207
P
we choose eks 1 k s then we get Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ m k¼0 qk ðsÞ k ¼ LC
k 1
ð1 k sÞ ¼ LC1
LC
1
k s.
q0 ðs; kÞ ¼ LC ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ LC
1 1
s ; q2 ðsÞ ¼ 0: Our Cylindrical RF network
antennas system second order characteristic equation: Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ
1
k þ bðsÞ k eks þ cðsÞ þ dðsÞ eks then aðsÞ ¼ 0 ; bðsÞ ¼ LC s cðsÞ ¼ 0 ;
dðsÞ ¼ LC and in the same manner like our previous case analysis: Pðk; sÞ ¼
1
s 2
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies x4 x2 ðLCÞ 2
1
ðLCÞ2
¼ 0; Fx ¼ 4 x3 2 x
s2 s 2
ðLCÞ2
¼ 2 x ½2 x2 ðLCÞ2
x2 2 s s
Fs ¼ ; PIx ¼ 0 ; PRx ¼ 2 x ; QIx ¼ ; QRx ¼ 0 ;
ðL CÞ 2 LC
x
PIs ¼ 0 ; PRs ¼ 0 ; QRs ¼ 0 ; QIs ¼
LC
s 2 I , n 2 N0 .
Defines the maps Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I , n 2 N0 that are continuous and
differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use Theorem 1.2. This prove the
Theorem 1.3 and Theorem 1.4.
Remark: Taylor approximation for eks 1 k s gives us good stability
analysis approximation only for restricted delay time interval.
Our Cylindrical RF network antennas homogeneous system for y, x leads to a
characteristic equation for the eigenvalue k having the for PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0;
second case s1 ¼s; s2 ¼ s; Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ LC 1
eks eks : We esti-
mate eks 1 k s. Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ LC 1
ð1 k sÞ eks
ks
Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k þ ðk LC s þ LCÞ e : We use different parameters
2 1 1
ðLCÞ
1
2 ¼ 0
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s2 1 s4 1
v¼ 2
4
þ4 ; v ¼ x2 ) x
2 ðL CÞ 2 ðL CÞ ðL CÞ2
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
u s 2 1 s4 1
¼ t 2
4
þ4
2 ðL CÞ 2 ðL CÞ ðL CÞ2
s4 s
2
ðLCÞ4
þ 4 ðLCÞ 1
2 [0 always and additional for x 2 R; x2 ¼ 2ðLCÞ
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s4 s2
ðLCÞ þ 4 ðLCÞ and there are two options: first always exist 2ðLCÞ2 þ 2
1 1 1
2
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi
s4
ðLCÞ4
þ 4 ðLCÞ 1
2 [ 0.
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s2 s4 s2 s4
2 2 þ 4 ðLCÞ 2 \0; x ¼ 2 LC fLC þ 4g.
1 1 2 1 1
Second 2ðLCÞ ðLCÞ4 ðLCÞ2
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s4 s2
ðLCÞ2
þ 4 [ LC ; Not exist and always negative for any Cylindrical RF net-
work antennas overall parameters values. We choose only the (+) option (first).
Writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼
i x into Cylindrical RF network antennas characteristic equation, x must satisfy
the following: sin x s ¼ gðxÞ ¼ PR ðixÞQI ðixÞ þ PI ðixÞQR ðixÞ
jQðixÞj2
.
cos x s ¼ hðxÞ ¼ PR ðixÞQR ðixÞ þ PI ðixÞQI ðixÞ
jQðixÞj2
; where jQði xÞj2 6¼ 0 in view
of requirement (a) above, and ðg; hÞ 2 R. Furthermore, it follows above sin x s
and cos x s equations that, by squaring and adding the sides, x must be a positive
root of FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 ¼ 0.
Note that FðxÞ is dependent of s. Now it is important to notice that if s 62 I
(assume that I R þ 0 is the set where xðsÞ is a positive root of FðxÞ and for s 62 I ,
xðsÞ is not define. Then for all s in I xðsÞ is satisfies that Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0.
210 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
Then there are positive xðsÞ solutions of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, and we analyze stability
switches. For any s 2 I where xðsÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0, we can
define the angle hðsÞ 2 ½0; 2 p as the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . .
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
and the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ s ¼ hðsÞ þ n 2 p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ
þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R ;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; C; L and Cylindrical RF network antennas param-
eters ðL; C; s etc:; Þ indicate the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first con-
centrate on ^ðxÞ, remember in kðL; C; s; etc:; Þ and xðL; C; s; etc:; Þ, and keeping
all parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation closely follows that in reference
[BK]. Differentiating Cylindrical RF network antennas characteristic equation
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and inverting the
derivative, for convenience, one calculates.
Remark: x ¼ L; C; s; etc:;
where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i x, and bearing i Pði xÞ ¼
Pði xÞ; Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ,
then i Pk ði xÞ ¼ Px ði xÞ and i Qk ði xÞ ¼ Qx ði xÞ and that on the sur-
face jPði xÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 , one obtains
x2 2 s
P2 ¼ x4 ; Fs ¼ ; PR ðx; sÞ ¼ x2 ; PI ðx; sÞ ¼ 0 ;
ðL CÞ2
xs 1
QI ðx; sÞ ¼ ; QR ðx; sÞ ¼
LC LC
x
PIs ¼ 0; PRs ¼ 0; QRs ¼ 0; QIs ¼ ) V 6¼ 0;
LC
@F s2
¼ Fx ¼ 4 x3 2 x
@x ðL CÞ2
@F s 2
@x ¼ 2 x ½2 x2 ðLCÞ 2 ; Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 and differentiating with respect to s
xs
and we get Fx @x @x Fs @x
@s þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) xs ¼ @s ¼ Fx ; @s ¼
ðLCÞ2
s2
½2x2
ðLCÞ2
@Rek @x xs
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; xs ¼ ¼
@s k¼ix @s ½2 x2 ðL CÞ2 s2
2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g
Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
s 2
s ½L21C2 þ x4 þ i x ½2 x2 ðLCÞ 2
¼ Ref x s
g
þ i x ½L21C2 þ x4
2
ðLCÞ2
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@s k¼ix
@x U @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g signfs þxþ g
@s jPj2
s2
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signf2 x ½2 x2 g
ðL CÞ2
xs
s ðLCÞ2 x
xs L2 C 2 ½ s2
þ L2 C 2
½2x2
ðLCÞ2 ðLCÞ2
signfs ½ þxþ g
s
½2 x2 ðLCÞ
2
2
x4
s 2
We define new variables: w1 ; w2 ; w3 : w1 ðx; s; L; CÞ ¼ 2 x ½2 x2 ðLCÞ 2
212 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
xs
s ðLCÞ2 x
xs L2 C2 ½ s2
þ L2 C 2
ðLCÞ2 ½2x2
ðLCÞ2
w2 ðx; s; L; CÞ ¼ s ½ ; w3 ðx; s; L; CÞ ¼
s2
½2 x2 ðLCÞ 2 x4
sign f^1 ðsÞg ¼ sign ½w1 sign ½w2 þ x þ w3 . We check the sign of ^1 ðsÞ
according the following rule.
If sign[K−1(s)] > 0 then the crossing proceeds from (−) to (+) respectively
(stable to unstable). If sign[K−1(s)] < 0 then the crossing proceeds from (+) to (−)
respectively (unstable to stable). Anyway the stability switching can occur only for
specific x, s. Since it is a very complex function, we recommend to solve it
numerically rather than analytic. We plot the stability switch diagram based on
different delay values of our Cylindrical RF network antennas system. Dðk; s1 ¼
s
eks k LC eks : Taylor expansion: eks 1 k s þ k 2s
2 2
s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k2 þ LC
1
since we need n > m [BK] analysis we choose eks 1 k s then we get our
Cylindrical RF network antennas system second order characteristic equation:
Dðk; sÞ ¼ k2 þ aðsÞ k þ bðsÞ k eks þ cðsÞ þ dðsÞ eks (Table 2.5).
s 1
aðsÞ ¼ 0; bðsÞ ¼ ; cðsÞ ¼ 0 ; dðsÞ ¼ ; Fðx; sÞ
LC LC
2 2 2 2
¼ jPði x; sÞj jQði x; sÞj ¼ ðc x Þ þ x2 a2 ðx2 b2 þ d 2 Þ
s 2
s 2
Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4 x2 ðLCÞ 2
1
ðLCÞ2
hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies x4 x2 ðLCÞ 2
p ffiffiffiffi
1
ðLCÞ2
¼ 0 and its roots are given by x þ ¼ 2 fðb þ 2 c a Þ þ Dg ¼
2 1 2 2
p ffiffiffiffi s2
2 f D þ ðLCÞ2 g
1
1 pffiffiffiffi 1 pffiffiffiffi s2
x2 ¼ fðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ Dg ¼ f D þ g;
2 2 ðL CÞ2
s2 þ 4
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ 4 ðc2 d 2 Þ ¼
ðL CÞ2
s þ4 2
D ¼ ðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ 4 ðc2 d 2 Þ ¼ ðLCÞ 2 therefore the following holds:
pffiffiffiffi PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
2 x2 ðb2 þ 2 c a2 Þ ¼ D; sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ ;
jQði x; sÞj2
ðc x2 Þ x b þ x a d x3 s L C
sin hðsÞ ¼ ¼
x 2 b2 þ d 2 ðx2 s2 þ 1Þ
which mounted outside a Pyrex glass tube of diameter 32 cm and length 50 cm.
The RF antenna consists of 16 copper (Cu) legs equally spaced by 6.7 cm inter-
connected with capacitors of 2.47nF. Copper leg diameter is equal to 1 mm and
length 30 cm = 300 mm (<Pyrex glass tube length, 50 cm). We consider for
Copper (Cu), relative permeability is one. f = 10 MHz is the typical testing fre-
quency for cylindrical (birdcage) antenna. L—inductance (nH), l—length of copper
leg (mm), d—diameter of copper leg, f—testing frequency. l > 100 d
(300 > 100 1 mm), d2 f > 1 mm2 MHz (1 mm2 10 MHz > 1 mm2 MHz).
L = 365.4 nH. L ¼ 15 l ½lnð4ld 1 ¼ 365:4 nH. For our stability switching anal-
ysis we choose typical Cylindrical RF network antennas parameters values (as
calculated): C ¼ 2:47 nF; L ¼ 365:4 nH; Rp ¼ 100Ohm then
LC ¼ 0:00110798 10 . We find those x; s values which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We
1 18
ignore negative, complex, and imaginary values of x for specific s values. The
below table gives the list.
Remark: We know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies it roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values, which xi are complex or imag-
inary numbered, then unable to analyze stability [6, 7]. We find those x; s values
which fulfill Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative, complex, and imaginary values of x
for specific s values. s 2 ½0:001::10 and we can be express by 3D function
s2
Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0. Fðx; sÞ ¼ x4 x2 ðLCÞ 2
1
ðLCÞ2
X
2
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ U0 þ U2 x2 þ U4 x4 ¼ U2k x2k
k¼0
s 2 P4
U0 ¼ ðLCÞ
1
2 ; U2 ¼
ðLCÞ2
; U4 ¼ 1 hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 U2k
sx ¼ 0.
2k
Table 2.13 Cylindrical RF network antennas system positive and real root xi ðsÞ values and
sinðx sÞ; cosðx sÞ values
x sLC
cosðx sÞ ¼ ðxx2 sLC
3 2
s[s] x sin ðx sÞ ¼ ðx2 s2 þ 1Þ 2 þ 1Þ
ðPR QR þ PI QI Þ
cosðx sÞ ¼ ; jQj2 ¼ Q2R þ Q2I ;
jQj2
x3 s L C x2 L C
sinðx sÞ ¼ ; cosðx sÞ ¼
ðx2 s2 þ 1Þ ðx2 s2 þ 1Þ
We plot the stability switch diagram based on different delay values of our
Cylindrical RF network antennas system. ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re k
@s Þk¼ix ¼
2
Ref2½U þ sjPj þ iFx
F þ i2½V þ xjPj2
g
s
@Rek 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
@Rek 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
Remark: We know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies it roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which xi is complex or imaginary
number, then unable to analyse stability [4, 5].
Discussion: We consider Cylindrical RF network antennas system. Due to RF
antenna copper leg parasitic effect we get copper leg’s current and current
derivative with delay s1–k and s2–k (k is leg number index, k = 1,…,16). Those
delays causes to stability switching for our Cylindrical RF network antennas. We
draw our Cylindrical RF network antennas equivalent circuit and get system dif-
ferential equations. Our variables are Y, X which are function of RF antenna copper
leg’s current and current derivative. Our system dynamic behavior is dependent on
circuit overall parameters and parasitic delay in time. We keep all circuit parameters
fix and change, parasitic delay over various values s 2 ½0:001::10. Our analysis
results extend that of in the way that it deals with stability switching for different
delay values. This implies that our system behavior of the circuit cannot inspect by
short analysis and we must study the full system. Several very important issues and
possibilities were left out of the present discussion. One possibility is the stability
switching by circuit parameters. Every circuit’s parameter variation can change our
system dynamic and stability behavior. This case can be solved by the same
methods combined with alternative and more technical hypotheses. Moreover,
numerical simulations for the Cylindrical RF network antennas model studied in
references suggest that this result can be extended to enhance models with more
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 219
general functions. Still another extension of our results would be to treat the case of
delayed Cylindrical RF network antennas leg’s higher derivative degree of current.
It would be extremely desirable to confirm these cases by mathematical proofs.
Conclusion: Cylindrical RF network antennas system is characterized by para-
sitic effects which can influence Cylindrical RF network antennas system stability
in time. There are two main Cylindrical RF network antennas variables which are
affected by antenna legs parasitic effects, Y and X functions of antenna leg’s
currents and currents derivatives respectively. Each Cylindrical RF network
antennas system variable under parasitic effects is characterized by time delay
respectively. The two time delays are not the same, but can be categorized to some
sub cases due to antenna leg parasitic behavior. The first case we analyze is when
there is delay in Cylindrical RF network antennas leg’s current and no delay in
antennas leg’s current derivative or opposite. The second case we analyze is when
there is delay both in Cylindrical RF network antennas leg’s current and current
time derivative [4, 5]. For simplicity of our analysis we consider in the second case
all delays are the same (there is a difference but it is neglected in our analysis). In
each case we derive the related characteristic equation. The characteristic equation
is dependent on Cylindrical RF network antennas system overall parameters and
parasitic time delay. Upon mathematics manipulation and [BK] theorems and
definitions we derive the expression which gives us a clear picture on
Cylindrical RF network antennas map. The stability map gives all possible options
for stability segments, each segment belongs to different time delay value segment.
Cylindrical RF network antennas system’s stability analysis can be influenced either
by system overall parameter values. We left this analysis and do not discuss it in the
current subchapter.
Lemma 1.1 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive and real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0.
Defined for s 2 I, which is continuous and differentiable. Assume further that if
k ¼ i x, x 2 R, then Pn ði x; sÞ þ Qn ði x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R hold true. Then the
functions Sn ðsÞ; n 2 N0 , are continuous and differentiable on I.
Theorem 1.2 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 defined for
s 2 I; I R þ 0 , and at some s 2 I, Sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for some n 2 N0 then a pair of
simple conjugate pure imaginary roots k þ ðs Þ ¼ i xðs Þ; k ðs Þ ¼ i xðs Þ of
Dðk; sÞ ¼ 0 exist at s ¼ s which crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if
dðs Þ [ 0 and cross the imaginary axis from right to left if dðs Þ\0 where
Has a pair of simple and conjugate pure imaginary roots k ¼ xðs Þ; xðs Þ
real at s 2 I if Sn ðs Þ ¼ s sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for some n 2 N0 . If xðs Þ ¼ x þ ðs Þ, this
pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary roots crosses the imaginary axis from left
to right if d þ ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from right to left if
dSn ðsÞ
d þ ðs Þ\0 where d þ ðs Þ ¼ signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix þ ðs Þ g ¼ signf ds js¼s g: If
xðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ, this pair of simple conjugate pure imaginary roots cross the
imaginary axis from left to right if d ðs Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from
right to left If d ðs Þ\0 where d ðs Þ ¼ signfd Re k
ds jk¼ix ðs Þ g ¼
n ðsÞ
signfdSds js¼s g: If x þ ðs Þ ¼ x ðs Þ ¼ xðs Þ then Dðs Þ ¼ 0 and
signfdRe k 0
ds jk¼ixðs Þ g ¼ 0, the same is true when Sn ðs Þ ¼ 0. The following result can
be useful in identifying values of s where stability switches happened.
Theorem 1.4 Assume that for all s 2 I, xðsÞ is defined as a solution of Fðx; sÞ ¼
0 then d ðsÞ ¼ signfD1=2 ðsÞg signD ðsÞ.
@Rek @Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s @s k¼ix
2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
¼
Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
@Rek 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
2.3 Cylindrical RF Network Antennas for Coupled Plasma Sources … 221
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g ¼ signfFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
@s k¼ix
Fs
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx fðV þ x P2 Þ ðU þ s P2 Þgg;
Fx
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx fðV þ x P2 Þ þ xs ðU þ s P2 Þgg
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx fV þ xs U þ x P2 þ xs s P2 gg;
V þ xs U
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfP2 Fx f þ x þ xs sgg
P2
V þ xs U
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfP2 g signfFx g signf þ x þ xs sg; signfP2 g [ 0
P2
V þ xs U
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g signf þ x þ xs sg:
P2
Case I: the circuit has three possible operating points. The middle point (inter-
section between TD’s characteristic NDR segment and work line) is typically
unstable, depending on parasitic L and C components. The circuit will operate at
one of the other two points (intersection between TD’s characteristic positive dif-
ferential resistance segment and work line).
Case II: The circuit has only one operating point (intersection between TD’s
characteristic NDR segment and work line). The total differential resistance is
negative because R < |Rd|. Depending on the L and C components, the circuit can
be stable (amplifier) or unstable (oscillator). Rd is a TD’s differential resistance
Rd ¼ @V @ID DID . R is a TD’s static resistance R ¼ ID . Typically for linear (Ohmic)
D DVD VD
If Rd > 0 or Rd < 0 and RL > |Rd| then oscillation goes down. If Rd < 0 and
RL < |Rd| then the oscillations goes up. The resonator circuit with NDR can
oscillate. Maximum frequency of TD-oscillator is limited by the characteristic
tunneling time fMAX ð2p
1
Þ ðstun
1
Þ, tunneling time in TDs is extremely small: 1ps,
fMAX > 100 GHz. We represent our Microwave resonant cavities thought of as
simple LC circuits. For a microwave cavity, the stored electric energy is equal to the
stored magnetic energy at resonance as is the case for a resonant LC circuit. In
terms of inductance and capacitance, the resonant frequency for a given mnl mode
can be written as Lmnl ¼ l kmnl2
Vcavity ; Cmnl ¼ k4 Ve cavity :
mnl
Vcavity is the cavity volume, kmnl is the mode wavenumber and e, l are per-
mittivity and permeability respectively. The resonant frequency (f) for a given mnl
mode can be written as fmnl ¼ 2ppffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1
L C
¼ q
1 ffiffiffiffiffi
le
:
mnl mnl 2p
k2
mnl
X
3 V
½ðgVD Þ1 VD ½ðVVD Þm VD ½VDVVV
ID ¼ nðVD Þ ¼ gi ðVD Þ ¼ Is e th þ e 0 þ e ex ;
i¼1
R0 RV
V
½ðgVD Þ1
g1 ðVD Þ ¼ Is e th
VD ½ðVVD Þm VD ½VDVVV
g2 ðVD Þ ¼ e 0 ; g3 ðVD Þ ¼ e ex ;
R0 RV
@g1 ðVD Þ 1 @VD ½ðgVVD Þ1
¼ Is e th
@ID g Vth @ID
@g2 ðVD Þ 1 @VD ½ðVVD Þm VD VD 1 @VD V
½ð D Þm
¼ e 0 þ fm ð Þm1 g e V0
@ID R0 @ID R0 V0 V0 @ID
@g2 ðVD Þ VD m 1 @VD ½ðVVD Þm
¼ f1 m ð Þ g e 0 ;
@ID V0 R0 @ID
@g3 ðVD Þ VD 1 @VD ½VDVVV
¼ ð1 þ Þ e ex
@ID Vex RV @ID
X 3
@ID X 3
@gi X 3
@gi @g1 ðVD Þ @g2 ðVD Þ @g3 ðVD Þ
ID ¼ gi ðVD Þ ) ¼ ) ¼ þ þ ¼1
i¼1
@I D i¼1
@I D i¼1
@I D @ID @ID @ID
1 @VD ½ðgVVD Þ1 VD 1 @VD ½ðVVD Þm
Is e th þ f1 m ð Þm g e 0
g Vth @ID V0 R0 @ID
VD 1 @VD ½VDVVV
þ ð1 þ Þ e ex ¼ 1
Vex RV @ID
@VD 1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD 1 ½ðVD Þm VD 1 ½VDVVV
½Is e gVth þ f1 m ð Þm g e V0 þ ð1 þ Þ e ex ¼ 1
@ID g Vth V0 R0 Vex RV
@VD 1
¼
@ID Is gVth e th
V
½ðgVD Þ1 m
V
½ð D Þm
þ f1 m ð V0 Þ g R10 e V0 þ ð1 þ R1V e½
VD VV
Vex
Vex Þ
1 V D VD
@VD 1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD 1 ½ðVD Þm VD
\0 ) fIs e gVth þ f1 m ð Þm g e V0 þ ð1 þ Þ
@ID g Vth V0 R0 Vex
1 ½VDVVV
e ex g\0
RV
dI
VLb ¼ VB3 VB ¼ Lb dtLb ¼ Lb dIdtD ; ID ¼ nðVD Þ; ID ¼ IRL þ IC þ IL ;
Vb—Constant supple voltage, VD—Tunnel diode voltage, VC—Capacitor voltage,
VL—Inductor voltage. Vi—Input voltage (is bypass in our case, S2 ON state).
Z
VA dVA 1
nðVD Þ ¼ þC þ VA dt;
RL dt L
Z
dIL VA 1
VA ¼ L ) dt ¼ dIL ) IL ¼ VA dt
dt L L
dnðVD Þ 1 dVA d 2 VA 1
¼ þ C 2 þ VA ;
dt RL dt dt L
dID
Vb ¼ VRb þ VLb þ VD þ VA ¼ ID Rb þ Lb þ VD þ VA
dt
dID dVA dID d 2 ID dVD
VA ¼ Vb ID Rb Lb VD ; jdVb ¼0 ¼ Rb Lb 2
dt dt dt dt dt dt
dVA dID d 2 ID dVD d 2 VA d 2 ID d 3 ID d 2 V D
jdVb ¼ Rb Lb 2 ) 2 ¼ Rb 2 Lb 3 2
dt dt ¼0 dt dt dt dt dt dt dt
dnðVD Þ 1 1 dID Rb Lb d 2 ID 1
¼ Vb ID Rb ½ þ 2 ½Lb þ C Rb
dt L L dt RL L dt RL
d 3 ID 1 1 dVD d 2 VD
C Lb 3 VD C 2
dt L RL dt dt
V V VD VV
½ðgVD Þ1 ½ð VD Þm
ID ¼ nðVD Þ ¼ Is e th þ VD
R0 e 0 þ VD
RV e½ Vex and we need to find
dnðVD Þ
dt :
dnðVD Þ 1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD 1 ½ðVD Þm VD 1
¼ fIs e gVth þ ð1 m ½ m Þ e V0 þ ð1 þ Þ
dt g Vth V0 R0 Vex RV
VD VV dVD
e½ Vex g
dt
1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD 1 ½ðVD Þm VD 1
wðVD Þ ¼ Is e gVth þ ð1 m ½ m Þ e V0 þ ð1 þ Þ
g Vth V0 R0 Vex RV
VD VV
e½ Vex
DÞ dwðVD Þ
dID
dt ¼ dnðV
dt ¼ wðVD Þ dVdtD : We need to find the expression: dt .
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 227
dwðVD Þ 1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD
¼ fIs 2
e gVth f1 þ m ð1 ½ m Þg
dt ðg Vth Þ V0
VD m1 m VD m
½ð Þ
ð Þ e V0
V0 R0 V0
VD 1 VD VV dVD
þ f2 þ g e½ Vex g
Vex Vex RV dt
1 V
½ðgVD Þ1 VD m
w1 ðVD Þ ¼ Is 2
e th f1 þ m ð1 ½ Þg
ðg Vth Þ V0
VD m1 m V
½ð D Þm
ð Þ e V0
V0 R0 V0
VD 1 VD VV dwðVD Þ dVD
þ f2 þ g e½ Vex ; ¼ w1 ðVD Þ
Vex Vex RV dt dt
dX 1 1 w ðVD Þ 2 1
¼ ðRb þ Þ X 1 X Y
dt wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ
dY wðVD Þ 1 1 dVD dVA
¼ X Y VA ; ¼X; ¼Y
dt C RL C LC dt dt
dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0. Then our fixed points are E ðX ; Y ; VD ; VA Þ ¼ ð0; 0; VD ; 0Þ:
dVD dVA
dt ; dt ;...
dX dY
Remark: Delay parameters don’t effect variables derivative in time
dX 1 1 w ðVD Þ 2 1
¼ ðRb þ Þ Xðt s1 Þ 1 X ðt s1 Þ Yðt s2 Þ
dt wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ
dY wðVD Þ 1 1
¼ Xðt s1 Þ Yðt s2 Þ VA ;
dt C RL C LC
dVD dVA
¼ Xðt s1 Þ ; ¼ Yðt s2 Þ
dt dt
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of tunnel diode system consists in adding to its coordinates
½X Y VD VA arbitrarily small increments of exponential terms x y vD vA , and retaining
the first order terms in ½x y vD vA ekt . The system of four homogeneous equations
leads to a polynomial characteristics equation in the eigenvalue k. The polynomial
characteristics equations accept by set the below TD’s variables equations (delayed
and undelayed) into four tunnel diode equations. Tunnel diode’s fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x y vD vA ekt are: i = 0 (first
fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc. Under TD’s
variables X(t) and Y(t), delays in time: XðtÞ ! Xðt s1 Þ; YðtÞ ! Yðt s2 Þ
jIC ðtÞ¼CdVA ¼CYðtÞ ) IC ðtÞ ! IC ðt s2 Þ:
dt
ðiÞ
XðtÞ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x ekt ; YðtÞ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y ekt ; VD ðtÞ ¼ VD þ vD ekt ;
ðiÞ
VA ðtÞ ¼ VA þ vA ekt
Xðt s1 Þ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x ekðts1 Þ ; Yðt s2 Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y ekðts2 Þ for i ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .
ðiÞ
Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x; Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y; VD ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VD þ vD ;
ðiÞ
VA ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA þ vA
Xðt s1 Þjt¼0 ¼ X ðiÞ þ x eks1 ; Yðt s2 Þjt¼0 ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y eks2 for i ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .
for k < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 is Unstable.
Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for k < 0, t > 0 other-
wise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the eigenvalue
parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or Unstable, additionally his
absolute value (|k|) establish the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point [2–5] (Table 2.14).
The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for TD system’s
variables are (k = 1, 2):
230 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
Table 2.14 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a microwave oscillator system eigenvalues options
k<0 k>0
t=0 Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x Xðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X ðiÞ þ x
Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y Yðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VD þ vD VD ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VD þ vD
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VA ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA þ vA VA ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA þ vA
ðiÞ jkjt ðiÞ
t>0 XðtÞ ¼ X þx e XðtÞ ¼ X þ x ejkjt
YðtÞ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y ejkjt YðtÞ ¼ Y ðiÞ þ y ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD ðtÞ ¼ VD þ vD ejkjt VD ðtÞ ¼ VD þ vD ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VA ðtÞ ¼ VA þ vA ejkjt VA ðtÞ ¼ VA þ vA ejkjt
for i ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . . for i ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .
t!∞ Xðt ! 1Þ ¼ X ðiÞ Xðt ! 1Þ x ejkjt
Yðt ! 1Þ ¼ Y ðiÞ Yðt ! 1Þ y ejkjt
ðiÞ
VD ðt ! 1Þ ¼ VD VD ðt ! 1Þ vD ejkjt
VA ðt
ðiÞ
! 1Þ ¼ VA VA ðt ! 1Þ vA ejkjt
dXðtÞ Xðt þ DtÞ XðtÞ X ðiÞ þ x ekðt þ DtÞ ½XðtÞ þ x ekt ekDt 1 þ Dtk
¼ lim ¼ lim !
dt Dt!1 Dt Dt!1 Dt
x ekt ðekDt 1Þ x ekt ð1 þ k Dt 1Þ dYðtÞ
lim ¼ ¼ x k ekt ; ¼ y k ekt
Dt!1 Dt Dt dt
dVD ðtÞ dVA ðtÞ dXðt s1 Þ
¼ vD k ekt ; ¼ vA k ekt ; ¼ x k ekt eks1 ;
dt dt dt
dYðt s2 Þ
¼ y k ekt eks2
dt
w1 ðVD Þ
wðVD Þ X Y Lb wðV and adding to it’s coordinates ½X Y VD VA arbitrarily small
2 1
DÞ
increments of exponential form ½x y vD vA ekt and retaining the first order terms in
x y vD vA .
dX 1 1 w ðVD Þ 2 1
¼ ðRb þ Þ Xðt s1 Þ 1 X ðt s1 Þ Yðt s2 Þ
dt wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ
1 1
x k ekt ¼ ðRb þ ðiÞ
Þ ½X ðiÞ þ x ekðts1 Þ
wðV þ vD e Þ kt L b
D
ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ 1
ðiÞ
½X ðiÞ þ x ekðts1 Þ 2 ½Y ðiÞ þ y ekðts2 Þ ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ Lb wðVD þ vD ekt Þ
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 231
1 V
½ð D Þ1 VD 1 ½ðVD Þm VD 1
wðVD Þ ¼ Is e gVth þ ð1 m ½ m Þ e V0 þ ð1 þ Þ
g Vth V0 R0 Vex RV
VD VV
e½ Vex
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD ! VD þ vD ekt ) wðVD Þ ! wðVD þ vD ekt Þ
1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ ðiÞ
½V þ vD ekt
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ 1 ½ð D gV Þ1 ½V þ vD ekt m
fIs e th þ ð1 m ½ D Þ
g Vth V0
ðiÞ
þ vD ekt m ðiÞ
1 ½ð½VD Þ ½VD þ vD ekt
e V0
ð1 þ Þ
R0 Vex
ðiÞ
þ vD ekt VV
1 ½½VD
e Vex g
RV
ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
1
¼ 1
ðiÞ þ C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ: We need to find C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ wðVD Þ
function.
1 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
þ C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ) C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ wðVD Þ
1 1
¼ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ wðVD Þ
1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ V
½ðgVD Þ1
ðiÞ V
½ð VD Þm
ðiÞ V VV
R1V e½ Vex
VD VD D
Is gV1 th e th þ ð1 m ½ V0 m Þ R10 e 0 þ ð1 þ Vex Þ
P
n
xi
m
e e e ¼ e i¼1 ;ðA þ
x1 x2 xn
BÞ
m m m
¼ Am þ Aðm1Þ B þ Aðm2Þ B2 þ þ
1 2 m1
A Bðm1Þ þ Bm
232 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
D 0 8 m
2 then
We consider vm
1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ ðiÞ
½V þ vD ekt
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ 1 ½ð D gV Þ1 ½V þ vD ekt m
fIs e th þ ð1 m ½ D Þ
g Vth V0
ðiÞ
þ vD ekt m ðiÞ
1 ½ð½VD Þ ½VD þ vD ekt
e V0
þ ð1 þ Þ
R0 Vex
ðiÞ
þ vD ekt VV
1 ½½VD
e Vex g
RV
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 233
1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ 1
½V
v ekt
½ D 1
V
ðiÞ
½D
gVth
fIs e e gVth þ ð1 m f½ D m
g Vth V0
ðiÞ kt
m V vD e
þ ½ D ðm1Þ ½ gÞ
1 V0 V0
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ
V f ½ VD ½ DV g
1 ½ VD m 1 0 0
e 0 e
R0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD vD ekt 1 ½VDVVV ½vDVekt
þ fð1 þ Þþ g e ex e ex g
Vex Vex RV
1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ 1
½V
½ D 1 v ekt V
ðiÞ
gVth ½D
fIs e e gVth þ ð1 m ½ D m Þ
g Vth V0
m V ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ
ðiÞ
f ½ VD ½ DV g
1 ½VVD m 1 0 0
e 0 e
R0
ðiÞ
m V vD ekt
m ½ D ðm1Þ ½
1 V0 V0
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ
1 ½VVD m f 1 ½ V0 ½ V0 g
D D
e 0 e
R0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD 1 ½VDVVV ½vDVekt vD ekt
þ ð1 þ Þ e ex e ex þ
Vex RV Vex
ðiÞ
1 ½VDVVV ½vDVekt
e ex e ex g
RV
ðiÞ
We define the following global parameters: Bi ¼ Bi ðVD Þ 8 i ¼ 1; 2; 3;
ðiÞ
B4 ¼ B4 ðVD ; vD Þ
ðiÞ
½V ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 ½ D 1 V 1 ½VD m
gV
B1 ¼ Is e th ; B2 ¼ ð1 m ½ D m Þ e V0 ; B3
g Vth V0 R0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD 1 ½VDVVV
¼ ð1 þ Þ e ex
Vex RV
234 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
1 1
ðiÞ
¼
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½ gVth
þ B3 e½ Vex
0
fB1 e þ B2 e 1
ðiÞ
vD ekt 1 ½VDVVV ½vDVekt
þ e ex e ex
Vex RV
ðiÞ
m V vD ekt
m ½ D ðm1Þ ½
1 V0 V0
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ f ½ VD ½ DV g
V
1 ½ VD m 1 0 0
e 0 e g
R0
1 1
ðiÞ
¼ ;
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ m V
ðiÞ
v ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ DV g v ekt
½ gV 1 0 0
½ DVex
fB1 e th þ B2 e þ B3 e þ B4 g
1 1
¼ 3
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ P
Bk
k¼1
1 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
þ C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ) C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ wðVD Þ
1 1
¼ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ wðVD Þ
ðiÞ 1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
m ðiÞ
V v ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ DV g vD ekt
½ 1 þ B3 e½ Vex
0 0
fB1 e gVth þ B2 e þ B4 g
1
3
P
Bk
k¼1
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 235
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
P
3 v ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½D
gVth 1
B3 e½ Vex B4
0
½ Bk B1 e
B2 e
ðiÞ
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼ k¼1
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ V ½ V g vD ekt P
3
½ gV 1 þ B3 e½ Vex þ B4 Þ ½ Bk
0 0
ðB1 e th þ B2 e
k¼1
Binomial coefficients:
Y
n k n iþ1 n ðn 1Þ ðn k þ 1Þ
¼ ¼ j n¼m
k i¼1 k! k! k¼1
Y1
¼ i¼1
ðn i þ 1Þj n¼m ¼ m
k¼1
n n! m
¼ 8 0 k n; n ¼ m & k ¼ 1 ) ¼ m;
k k!ðn kÞ! 1
Y
n k
n iþ1
¼
k i¼1
k!
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
P
3 vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½ gV 1
B3 e½ Vex B4
0
½ Bk B1 e
B2 e th
ðiÞ
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
k¼1
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
vD e kt f ½ V ½ V g vD ekt P
3
½ 1 þ B3 e½ Vex þ B4 Þ ½ Bk
0 0
ðB1 e gVth þ B2 e
k¼1
½
vD ekt
gVth
vD ekt 1 v2 e2kt vD ekt
e ¼ 1þ þ D þ jvk 08 k
2 ¼ 1 þ þ ðe ! 0Þ
g Vth 2 ½g Vth 2 D g Vth
vD ekt
1þ
g Vth
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt ðiÞ
f ½ V ½ V g
m V vD ekt 1
1 ½ D ðm1Þ ½
0 0
e ¼1 þ
1 V0 V0 2
2 ðiÞ
m V v 2
e 2kt
½ D 2ðm1Þ ½ D 2 þ
1 V0 V0
ðiÞ
f
m V
½ VD ðm1Þ ½
vD ekt ðiÞ
V0 g VD ðm1Þ vD ekt
m
e 1 0
¼1 ½ ½ þ ðe ! 0Þ
V0 1 V0
ðiÞ
m V vD ekt
1 ½ D ðm1Þ ½
1 V0 V0
236 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
X ðiÞ
3
vD ekt m VD ðm1Þ vD ekt
½ Bk B1 ½1 þ B2 f1 ½ ½ g
k¼1
g Vth 1 V0 V0
vD ekt
B3 ½1 þ B4
ðiÞ Vex
C1 ðVD ; vD ; ::::Þ ¼
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ V ½ V g vD ekt P
3
½ gV 1 þ B3 e½ Vex þ B4 Þ ½ Bk
0 0
ðB1 e th þ B2 e
k¼1
ðiÞ
kt m
½ VD0 ðm1Þ ½vDVe0 B3 vDVeex B4
kt kt
D e V
B1 vgV þ B 2
ðiÞ
th 1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
v e kt f ½ V ½ V g vD ekt P 3
½D
gVth 1 þ B3 e½ Vex þ B4 Þ ½ Bk
0 0
ðB1 e þ B2 e
k¼1
ðiÞ
vD ekt m VD ðm1Þ vD ekt
B1 þ B2 ½ ½
g Vth 1 V0 V0
vD ekt
B3 B4
ðiÞ Vex
C1 ðVD ; vD ; ::::Þ ¼
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½ gV
þ B3 e½ Vex
0
ðB1 e th þ B2 e 1 Þ
X
3 X
3
½ Bk þ B4 ½ Bk
k¼1 k¼1
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½ gVth 1 þ B3 e½ Vex
0
We define: X4 ðvD Þ ¼ B1 e þ B2 e
ðiÞ
m
½ VD0 ðm1Þ ½vDVe0 B3 vDVeex B4
kt kt kt
D e V
B1 vgV þ B2
ðiÞ
th 1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
P
3 P
3
X4 ðvD Þ ½ Bk þ B4 ½ Bk
k¼1 k¼1
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 237
V VV
ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ 1 m V 1
e½ Vex m ½ D ðm1Þ
D
X3 ðVD Þ ¼
Vex RV 1 V0 V0 R0
ðiÞ
V
½ VD m
e 0 ; B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD
v 0
D D
ðiÞ kt
¼ X3 ðVD Þ vD e
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
v ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½D
gVth 1 þ B 3 e½Vex
0
X4 ðvD Þ ¼ B1 e þ B2 e
ðiÞ
vD ekt m VD ðm1Þ vD ekt
X4 ðvD Þ ¼ B1 ½1 þ þ B2 f1 ½ ½ g þ B3
g Vth 1 V0 V0
vD ekt
½1 þ
Vex
238 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
X ðiÞ
3
vD ekt m V vD ekt vD ekt
X4 ðvD Þ ¼ ½ Bi þ B1 B2 ½ D ðm1Þ ½ þ B3
i¼1
g Vth 1 V0 V0 Vex
X 3 ðiÞ
B1 m V 1 B3
X4 ðvD Þ ¼ ½ Bi þ f B2 ½ D ðm1Þ ½ þ g vD ekt
i¼1
g V th 1 V 0 V 0 V ex
ðiÞ
ðiÞ m
½ VD0 ðm1Þ ½V10 þ
V
We define: X5 ðVD Þ ¼ B1
gVth B2 B3
Vex
1
X
3
ðiÞ
X4 ðvD Þ ¼ ½ Bi þ X5 ðVD Þ vD ekt
i¼1
m ðiÞ
ðiÞ
½ VD0 ðm1Þ ½vDVe0 B3 vDVeex X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt
kt kt kt
D e V
B1 vgV þ B2
ðiÞ
th
1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
P
3
ðiÞ P
3
ðiÞ P
3
f½ Bi þ X5 ðVD Þ vD ekt g ½ Bk þ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt ½ Bk
i¼1 k¼1 k¼1
ðiÞ
m ðiÞ
½ VD0 ðm1Þ V10 B3 V1ex X3 ðVD Þg vD ekt
V
fB1 gV1 th þ B2
ðiÞ 1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
P
3 P3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bi 2 þ ½ Bk fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg vD ekt
i¼1 k¼1
ðiÞ
ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ vD ekt
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
P
3 P3
ðiÞ
½ Bk f½ Bk þ X7 ðVD Þ vD ekt g
k¼1 k¼1
P
3
ðiÞ
f½ Bk X7 ðVD Þ vD ekt g
k¼1
P3
ðiÞ
f½ Bk X7 ðVD Þ vD ekt g
k¼1
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 239
P
3
ðiÞ Q
7
ðiÞ
½ Bk X6 ðVD Þ vD ekt ½ Xi ðVD Þ v2D e2kt
ðiÞ k¼1 i¼6
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼
P
3 P
3
ðiÞ
½ Bk f½ Bk 2 X27 ðVD Þ v2D e2kt g
k¼1 k¼1
We consider v2D ! e 0
ðiÞ
ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ 1
C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þjv2 !e0 ¼ vD ekt ;
D P
3 ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ
½ Bk 2
k¼1
ðiÞ
1 X6 ðVD Þ
¼ þ vD ekt
wðVD Þ
ðiÞ P
3
½ Bk 2
k¼1
We can summery our system global parameters in the below Table 2.15:
Table 2.15 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a microwave oscillator system global parameters
Global parameter Expression
ðiÞ ðiÞ
B1 ðVD Þ ½V
½ D 1
gVth
Is 1
gVth e
ðiÞ ðiÞ
B2 ðVD Þ V
ðiÞ V
½ VD m
ð1 m ½ VD0 m Þ R10 e 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
B3 ðVD Þ VD
ðiÞ V VV
½ DVex
ð1 þ Vex Þ R1V e
B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ðiÞ
V VV
ðiÞ V
ðiÞ
¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD m ½ VD m
fVex1RV e½ Vex ½ VD0 ðm1Þ V01R0 e
V
g vD ekt
D
v 0
D D m 0
1
ðiÞ
B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD ¼ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt
v 0
D D
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ w1 ðVD Þ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ ¼ ðiÞ þ C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ. We need to find C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ wðVD Þ
function
ðiÞ
þ vD ekt ðiÞ
1 ½ð
V
D Þ1 VD þ vD ekt m
Is 2
e gVth
f1 þ m ð1 ½ Þg
ðg Vth Þ V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ vD ekt m
VD þ vD ekt m1 m V
½ð D Þ
ð Þ e V0
V0 R0 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD þ vD ekt 1 V þ vD ekt VV
e½
D
ðiÞ þ f2 þ g Vex
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ Vex V R
ðiÞ
¼ ex V
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ f
m VDðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
½ V ½ V g
vD ekt vD ekt
½ gV 1 þ B3 e½ Vex þ B4 g
0 0
fB1 e th þ B2 e
Under the Taylor series high order elements tend to zero (. . . vkD ! e 8 k
2)
ðiÞ
assumption for exponent functions: B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD ¼ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt
v 0
D D
ðiÞ
1 V vD ekt
½gVD 1 ½ gVth
Is 2
e th e
ðg Vth Þ
ðiÞ
VD þ vD ekt m
f1 þ m ð1 ½ Þg
V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ vD ekt m
V þ vD ekt m1 m V
½ð D Þ
ð D Þ e V0
V0 R0 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD vD ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
e½ Vex e½ Vex
D
ðiÞ þ fð2 þ Þþ g
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ Vex Vex V R
ðiÞ
¼ ex V
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
v ekt f ½ VD ½ DV g
½D 1 0 0
fB1 e gVth
þ B2 e
vD ekt
ðiÞ
þ B3 e½ Vex þ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt g
V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
ðiÞ
1 ½ D 1 ½ gVth
VD m
Is 2
e gVth e f1 þ m ð1 ½
ðg Vth Þ V0
ðiÞ
m V vD ekt
½ D ðm1Þ ½ Þg
1 V0 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V m1 V
f½ D m1 þ ½ D ðm2Þ
V0 1 V0
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ ½ VD ½ DV
kt
vD e m V
½
D m
1 0 0
½ g e V0 e
V0 R0 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V 1 V VV vD ekt
e½ Vex e½ Vex
D
þ ð2 þ D Þ
Vex Vex RV
ðiÞ
vD ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
e½ Vex e½ Vex
D
ðiÞ þ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ Vex Vex RV
ðiÞ
¼
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ½ V0 g
½ gVth 1 0
fB1 e þ B2 e
v ekt
½ DVex ðiÞ
þ B3 e þ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt g
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g
½ gVth 1 0
We already define: X4 ðvD Þ ¼ B1 e þ B2 e þ
vD ekt
½ Vex
B3 e
P ðiÞ
And X4 ðvD Þ ¼ ½ 3i¼1 Bi þ X5 ðVD Þ vD ekt
m ðiÞ
V vD ekt
v ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
½D
gVth 1 ðiÞ
þ B 3 e½ Vex þ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt
0
B1 e þ B2 e
ðiÞ
¼ X4 ðvD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt
ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X4 ðvD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt ¼ ½ Bi þ X5 ðVD Þ vD ekt þ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt
i¼1
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼½ Bi þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg vD ekt
i¼1
242 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
ðiÞ
1 ½ D 1 ½ gVth
VD m
Is 2
e gVth e f1 þ m ð1 ½
ðg Vth Þ V0
!
ðiÞ
m V vD ekt
½ D ðm1Þ ½ Þg
1 V0 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD m1 m1 V
f½ þ ½ D ðm2Þ
V0 1 V0
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
ðiÞ
kt ½ VD ½ DV
vD e m V
½
D m
1 0 0
½ g e V0 e
V0 R0 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD 1 V VV vD ekt
e½ Vex e½ Vex
D
þ ð2 þ Þ
Vex Vex RV
ðiÞ
vD ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
e½ Vex e½ Vex
D
ðiÞ þ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ Vex Vex RV
¼
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ P3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bi þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg vD ekt
i¼1
V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
ðiÞ
ðiÞ 1 ½ D 1 ½ VD m
gVth
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ ¼ Is 2
e gVth e Þ f1 þ m ð1 ½
ðg Vth Þ V0
!
ðiÞ ðiÞ
m V vD ekt V m1
m ½ D ðm1Þ ½ g f½ D m1 þ
1 V0 V0 V0 1
ðiÞ
VD ðm2Þ vD ekt
½ ½ g
V0 V0
m V ðiÞ ðm1Þ v ekt
V
ðiÞ ½ VD ½ DV ðiÞ
m ½ VD m 1 0 0 V
e 0 e þ ð2 þ D Þ
R0 V0 Vex
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 V VV vD ekt vD ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
e½ Vex e½ Vex þ e½ Vex e½ Vex
D D
Vex RV Vex Vex RV
ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ V V
N1 ðVD Þ ¼ ½1 þ m ð1 ½ D m Þ ½ D m1 ;
V0 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ VD m m1 V
N2 ðVD Þ ¼ ½1 þ m ð1 ½ Þ ½ D ðm2Þ
V0 1 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
V m V ðiÞ ðiÞ vD ekt
½ D m1 m ½ D ðm1Þ ) N1 ðVD Þ þ N2 ðVD Þ ½ ;
V0 1 V0 V0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
N1 ¼ N1 ðVD Þ; N2 ¼ N2 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
ðiÞ kt 1 V
½gVD 1 ½
vD ekt
gVth
vD ekt
w1 ðVD þ vD e Þ ¼ Is 2
e th e fN1 þ N2 ½ g
ðg Vth Þ V0
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
V
ðiÞ ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0
ðiÞ
m ½ VD m 1 0 VD
e 0 e þ ð2 þ Þ
R0 V0 Vex
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 V VV vD ekt 1 V VV vD ekt
e½ Vex e½ Vex þ 2 e½ Vex e½ Vex vD ekt
D D
Vex RV Vex RV
ðiÞ
V
½ D 1
We define for simplicity the following parameters: N3 ¼ Is ðgV1 Þ2
e gVth
th
V
ðiÞ
V VV ðiÞ V VV
ðiÞ ðiÞ
m ½ D m V 1 1
e½ Vex ; N6 ¼ 2 e½ Vex
D D
N4 ¼ e V0 ; N5 ¼ ð2 þ D Þ
R0 V0 Vex Vex RV Vex RV
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0
ðiÞ kt
v ekt
½D
gVth
vD ekt 1 0
w1 ðVD þ vD e Þ ¼ N3 e fN1 þ N2 ½ g N4 e
V0
vD ekt vD ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ N5 e ½ Vex þ N6 e ½ Vex vD ekt ; N3 ¼ N3 ðVD Þ; N4 ¼ N4 ðVD Þ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
N5 ¼ N5 ðVD Þ; N6 ¼ N6 ðVD Þ
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 245
Under the Taylor series high order elements tend to zero (. . . vkD ! e 8 k
2)
vD ekt vD ekt
½ gVth vD ekt vD ekt
assumption for exponent functions: e 1þ gVth ; e½Vex ¼ 1þ Vex
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
!
½ VD ðm1Þ ½ ðiÞ
V0 m VD ðm1Þ vD ekt
e 1 0
1 ½ ½
1 V0 V0
ðiÞ vD ekt vD ekt m
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ ¼ N3 ½1 þ fN1 þ N2 ½ g N4 f1
g Vth V0 1
ðiÞ
VD ðm1Þ vD ekt vD ekt vD ekt
½ ½ g þ N5 ½1 þ þ N6 ½1 þ vD ekt
V0 V0 Vex Vex
ðiÞ kt vD ekt m
w1 ðVD þ vD e Þ ¼ N 3 þ N 3 fN4 N1 þ N4 ðN2 N1
g Vth 1
ðiÞ kt
ðiÞ
V vD e m V v2 e2kt
½ D ðm1Þ Þ N4 N2 ½ D ðm1Þ ½ D 2 g
V0 V0 1 V0 V0
vD ekt v2 e2kt
þ N5 þ N5 þ N6 vD ekt þ N6 D
Vex Vex
ðiÞ ðiÞ
We define: U1 ¼ N5 þ N3 N4 N1 ; U1 ¼ U1 ðVD Þ; U2 ¼ U2 ðVD Þ
!
ðiÞ
1 m VD ðm1Þ N4 N5
U2 ¼ N3 ðN2 N1 ½ Þ þ þ N6
g Vth 1 V0 V0 Vex
246 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ U1 þ U2 vD ekt
¼
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ P
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bi þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg vD ekt
i¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ w1 ðVD Þ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
¼ ðiÞ
þ C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ) C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ wðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ w1 ðVD Þ
¼ ðiÞ
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ wðVD Þ
ðiÞ
ðiÞ U1 þ U2 vD ekt w1 ðVD Þ
C2 ðVD ; vD ; ::::Þ ¼
P
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ wðVD Þ
ðiÞ
½ Bi þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg vD ekt
i¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
U1 wðVD Þ þ U2 wðVD Þ vD ekt w1 ðVD Þ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
ð½ Bi þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD ÞgÞ vD ekt
i¼1
¼
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bi wðVD Þ þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg
i¼1
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ vD ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
U1 wðVD Þ þ fU2 wðVD Þ w1 ðVD Þ
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
ð½ Bi þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD ÞgÞg vD ekt
ðiÞ i¼1
C2 ðVD ; vD ; ::::Þ ¼
P
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bi wðVD Þ þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD Þg wðVD Þ vD ekt
i¼1
ðiÞ
We define for simplicity the following global parameters: U3 ¼ U1 wðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
U4 ¼ U2 wðVD Þ w1 ðVD Þ ð½ Bi þ fX5 ðVD Þ þ X3 ðVD ÞgÞ;
i¼1
X
3
ðiÞ
U5 ¼ ½ Bi wðVD Þ
i¼1
Table 2.16 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a microwave oscillator system expressions and equivalent
expressions
Expression Equivalent expression
1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðVD Þ ðiÞ X ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ
1
ðiÞ þ P
6
3 vD ekt ; C1 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þjv2 !e0 ¼ P
6
3 vD ekt
wðVD Þ 2 D
½ Bk ½ Bk 2
k¼1 k¼1
ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ ðiÞ
þ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ
þ ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
vD ekt
ðiÞ
ðiÞ U3 ðVD Þ
C2 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þjv2 !e0 ¼ ðiÞ
D
U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ
þ ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
kt
vD e
248 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
1 1
x k ekt ¼ ðRb þ ðiÞ
Þ ½X ðiÞ þ x ekðts1 Þ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ Lb
ðiÞ
w1 ðVD þ vD ekt Þ
ðiÞ
½X ðiÞ þ x ekðts1 Þ 2 ½Y ðiÞ þ y ekðts2 Þ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ
1
ðiÞ
Lb wðVD þ vD ekt Þ
ðiÞ
1 X6 ðVD Þ 1
x k ekt ¼ ðRb þ f þ vD ekt gÞ ½X ðiÞ þ x ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ
ðiÞ P
3 Lb
½ Bk 2
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
f 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ
þ ðiÞ
vD ekt g
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ kðts1 Þ 2 ðiÞ kðts2 Þ
½X þx e ½Y þy e
ðiÞ
1 1 X6 ðV Þ
f þ 3 D vD ekt g
Lb wðV ðiÞ Þ P
D ½ Bk 2
k¼1
ðiÞ
1 X6 ðVD Þ 1
x k ekt ¼ ðRb þ f þ vD ekt gÞ ½X ðiÞ þ x ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ
ðiÞ P
3 Lb
½ Bk 2
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
f 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ
þ ðiÞ
vD ekt g
U25 ðVD Þ
1
f½X ðiÞ 2 þ 2 X ðiÞ x ekðts1 Þ g ½Y ðiÞ þ y ekðts2 Þ
Lb
ðiÞ
1 X6 ðVD Þ
f þ vD ekt g
wðVD Þ
ðiÞ P
3
2
½ Bk
k¼1
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 249
1 1 1 1
x k ekt ¼ ½Rb þ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ ½Rb þ ðiÞ
x ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ X6 ðVD Þ
3 vD ekt 3 vD x ekðts1 Þ ekt
Lb P 2 P 2
½ Bk ½ Bk Lb
k¼1 k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
½X ðiÞ 2 ½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
2 X ðiÞ x ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ ½X ðiÞ 2
ðiÞ
vD ekt
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ 2 X ðiÞ
ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ 1 Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
vD x ekðts1 Þ ekt vD ekt
Lb wðV ðiÞ Þ Lb P 3
2
D ½ Bk
k¼1
ðiÞ
1 1 X6 ðV Þ
y ekðts2 Þ 3 D vD y ekðts2 Þ ekt
Lb wðVD Þ
ðiÞ L b P
½ Bk 2
k¼1
We consider vD x 0; vD y 0
1 1 1 1
x k ekt ¼ ½Rb þ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ ½Rb þ ðiÞ
x ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
3 vD ekt ½ 1 ðiÞ þ ½X ðiÞ 2
Lb P 2 wðV Þ U ðV
ðiÞ
Þ
½ Bk D 5 D
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
2 X ðiÞ x ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ ½X ðiÞ 2
ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ 1 Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ 1
vD ekt vD ekt y ekðts2 Þ
Lb wðV ðiÞ Þ Lb P 3
2 Lb wðVD Þ
ðiÞ
D ½ Bk
k¼1
250 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
ðiÞ
11 w ðVD Þ Y ðiÞ 1
x k ekt ¼ ½Rb þ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
½X ðiÞ 2
wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ Lb wðV ðiÞ Þ
D
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 1 X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
½Rb þ x ekðts1 Þ 3 vD ekt ½X ðiÞ 2
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ Lb Lb P ðiÞ
U5 ðVD Þ
½ B k 2
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w1 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
½ ðiÞ
þ ðiÞ
2 X ðiÞ x ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ ½X ðiÞ 2
ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ 1
vD ekt 3 vD ekt y ekðts2 Þ
Lb P 2 L wðV
ðiÞ
Þ
½ Bk b D
k¼1
ðiÞ
w1 ðVD Þ
At fixed point: ðRb þ 1
ðiÞ Þ L1b X ðiÞ ðiÞ ½X ðiÞ 2 Y ðiÞ 1
ðiÞ ¼0
wðVD Þ wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ
ðiÞ
1 1 X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
x k ekt ¼ ½Rb þ x ekðts1 Þ
3 vD ekt
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ Lb Lb P 2
½ Bk
k¼1
ðiÞ
U3 ðVD Þ 1
ðiÞ
½X ðiÞ 2 ðiÞ
y ekðts2 Þ
U5 ðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
2 X ðiÞ x ekðts1 Þ
wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ ½X ðiÞ 2
ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
vD ekt 3 vD ekt
Lb P
½ Bk 2
k¼1
ðiÞ
U3 ðVD Þ
We need to choose the right parameters which give ðiÞ ½X ðiÞ 2 ¼ 0 since
U5 ðVD Þ
there is no ekt multiplication term. We already approve our fixed points are
ðiÞ
U3 ðVD Þ
E ðX ; Y ; VD ; VA Þ ¼ ð0; 0; VD ; 0Þ. X ðiÞ ¼ 0 ) ðiÞ ½X ðiÞ 2 ¼ 0
U5 ðVD Þ
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 251
ðiÞ
1 1 X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
x k ekt ¼ ½Rb þ x ekt eks1
3 vD ekt
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ Lb Lb P 2
½ B k
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 w1 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
y ekt eks2 ½ ðiÞ
þ ðiÞ
2 X ðiÞ x ekt eks1
Lb wðVD Þ wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ ½X ðiÞ 2
ðiÞ
vD ekt
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
3 vD ekt
Lb P 2
½ Bk
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1
1 w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
fk ð½Rb þ ðiÞ
þ ½ 1 ðiÞ þ ðiÞ
2 X ðiÞ Þ eks1 g x
wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
1 X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
eks2 y f 3
Lb wðVD Þ
ðiÞ Lb P
½ B k 2
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ ½X ðiÞ 2
þ ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
þ 3 g vD ¼ 0
Lb P
½ B k 2
k¼1
252 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 1 w ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ
P1 ¼ ½Rb þ ðiÞ
þ ½ 1 ðiÞ
þ ðiÞ
2 X ðiÞ ; P2
wðVD Þ Lb wðVD Þ U5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
¼ P2 ðVD ; X ðiÞ ; Y ðiÞ ; . . .Þ
ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
P2 ¼ 3
Lb P
½ B k 2
k¼1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðU5 ðVD Þ U4 ðVD Þ U3 ðVD Þ U6 ðVD ÞÞ ½X ðiÞ 2
þ ðiÞ
U25 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Y ðiÞ X6 ðVD Þ
þ 3
Lb P
½ B k 2
k¼1
1
fk P1 eks1 g x ðiÞ
eks2 y P2 vD ¼ 0
Lb wðVD Þ
wðVD Þ
Second TD’s system differential equation: dY dt ¼ C X RL C Y LC VA and
1 1
ðiÞ
We already approve B4 jX1 ðvD Þj 2 ¼X2 ðvD Þjv2 0 ¼vD ¼ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt
v 0
D D
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 253
m V
ðiÞ
vD ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ V0 g vD ekt
ðiÞ ½ gVth
þ vD ekt Þ ¼ B1 e þ B 3 e½ Vex
0
wðVD þ B2 e 1 þ B4
m V
ðiÞ
v ekt
vD ekt f ½ VD ðm1Þ ½ DV g vD ekt
ðiÞ ½ gVth
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ ¼ B1 e þ B 3 e½ Vex
0 0
þ B2 e 1
ðiÞ
þ X3 ðVD Þ vD ekt
ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ
wðVD þ vD ekt Þ ¼ ½ Bk þ X7 ðVD Þ vD ekt
k¼1
ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
C3 ðVD ; vD ; . . .Þ ¼ ½ Bk þ X7 ðVD Þ vD ekt wðVD Þ
k¼1
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ f½ Bk wðVD Þg þ X7 ðVD Þ vD ekt
k¼1
ðiÞ
X
3
ðiÞ 1 ½ D 1
gV
½V
V
1 ½VD m
ðiÞ ðiÞ
½ Bk wðVD Þ ¼ Is e th þ ð1 m ½ D m Þ e V0
k¼1
g Vth V0 R0
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD 1 ½VDVVV 1 V
½ð D Þ1
þ ð1 þ Þ e ex fIs e gVth
Vex RV g Vth
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
VD m 1 ½ðVVD Þm V 1 ½VDVVV
þ ð1 m ½ Þ e 0 þ ð1 þ D Þ e ex g ¼ 0
V0 R0 Vex RV
ðiÞ ðiÞ
½wðVD Þ þ X7 ðVD Þ vD ekt 1
y k ekt ¼ ½X ðiÞ þ x ekðts1 Þ ½Y ðiÞ þ y
C RL C
1 ðiÞ
ekðts2 Þ ½VA þ vA ekt
LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ X7 ðVD Þ vD ekt 1
y k ekt ¼ ½ þ ½X ðiÞ þ x ekðts1 Þ Y ðiÞ
C C RL C
1 1 ðiÞ 1
y ekðts2 Þ V vA ekt
RL C LC A LC
254 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
We consider vD x 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ vD ekt 1
y k ekt ¼ x ekðts1 Þ þ y ekðts2 Þ
C C RL C
1
vA ekt
LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ 1 1
yk¼ x eks1 þ vD y eks2 vA
C C RL C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ 1 1
x eks1 y k þ vD y eks2 vA ¼ 0
C C RL C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ 1 X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ 1
x eks1 y k y eks2 þ vD vA ¼ 0
C RL C C LC
Third TD’s system differential equation: dVdtD ¼ Xðt s1 Þ and adding to it’s
coordinates ½X Y VD VA arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x y vD vA
ekt and retaining the first order terms in x y vD vA [9, 10].
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 255
ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
fk P1 ðVD Þ eks1 g x ðiÞ
eks2 y P2 ðVD Þ vD ¼ 0
Lb wðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
wðVD Þ 1 X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ 1
eks1 x k y eks2 y þ vD vA ¼ 0
C RL C C LC
x eks1 k vD ¼ 0; y eks2 k vA ¼ 0
0 1
!11 ... !14
B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A; det jA k Ij ¼ 0
!41 !44
256 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
0 ðiÞ
1
ks2 X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ
B k RL C e LC
1 1
ðiÞ
C C
det jA k Ij ¼ ½k þ P1 ðVD Þ eks1
detB
@ 0 k 0 A
C
eks2 0 k
0 ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
1
wðVD Þ X X7 ðVD Þ
B C eks1 C LC
1
C
1
þ ðiÞ
e ks2
detB
@ eks1 k 0 A
C
Lb wðVD Þ
0 0 k
0 ðiÞ
1
wðVD Þ
eks1 k RL1C eks2 LC
1
ðiÞ B C C
P2 ðVD Þ det B ks1 C
@ e 0 0 A
0 eks2 k
ðiÞ 1 1
det jA k Ij ¼ ½k þ P1 ðVD Þ eks1 fðk þ eks2 Þ k2 eks2 kg
RL C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 wðVD Þ ks1 2 X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ ks1
þ ðiÞ
eks2 f e k þ e kg
Lb wðVD Þ C C
ðiÞ 1 1
P2 ðVD Þ fðk þ eks2 Þ eks1 k ekðs1 þ s2 Þ g
RL C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Dðk; s1 ; s2 Þ ¼ k4 þ fk3 P1 ðVD Þ þ k2 P2 ðVD Þg eks1
ðiÞ
1 1 1 P1 ðVD Þ 1
þ ðk3 þ k2 Þ eks2 þ fk2 ½ þ
RL C LC C RL Lb
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
P
2
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ kk ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ p1 ðsÞ k þ p2 ðsÞ k2 þ p3 ðsÞ k3 þ . . .
k¼0
Xm
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ k þ q2 ðsÞ k2 þ q3 ðsÞ k3 þ . . .
k¼0
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 257
1 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
Dðk; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ k3 þ k2 þ fk3 P1 ðVD Þ þ k2 P2 ðVD Þ
RL C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 P1 ðVD Þ 1 1 P1 ðVD Þ
þ k2 ½ þ þk ½
C RL Lb C L
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ
þ þ þ g eks
Lb
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ RL LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ 1 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ k3 P1 ðVD Þ þ k2 P2 ðVD Þ þ fk3 þ k2
RL C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 P1 ðVD Þ 1 1 P1 ðVD Þ
þ k2 ½ þ þk ½
C RL Lb C L
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ
þ þ þ g eks
Lb
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ RL LC
ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3 ½P1 ðVD Þ þ þ k2 ½P2 ðVD Þ þ g eks
RL C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 P1 ðVD Þ 1 1 P1 ðVD Þ
þ fk2 ½ þ þk ½
C RL Lb C L
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ
þ þ þ g e2ks
Lb
ðiÞ
wðVD Þ RL LC
ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3 ½P1 ðVD Þ þ þ k2 ½P2 ðVD Þ þ g eks
RL C LC
ðiÞ ðiÞ
1 P1 ðVD Þ 1 1 P1 ðVD Þ
þ fk2 ½ þ þk ½
C RL Lb C L
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ
þ þ þ g ð1 k sÞ eks
Lb wðVD Þ
ðiÞ RL LC
258 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s þ k2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
B4 ðVD Þ s þ k ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þg eks
(Table 2.17)
Table 2.17 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a microwave oscillator system Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ functions
vs s1 and s2 options
s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0 s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s
Pn ðk; sÞ k þk
4 3 1
RL C þk
2 1
LC
ðiÞ
k4 þ k3 P1 ðVD Þ þ k2 P2 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
Qm ðk; sÞ k3 P1 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ 1 1
k3 þ k2 f
ðiÞ RL C LC
ðiÞ 1 P1 ðVD Þ 1 ðiÞ
þ k2 fP2 ðVD Þ þ ½ þ g 1 P1 ðVD Þ 1
C RL Lb þ ½ þ g
ðiÞ ðiÞ C RL Lb
1 P1 ðVD Þ X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ ðiÞ
þk ½ þ ðiÞ 1 P1 ðVD Þ
C L Lb wðVD Þ þk ½
C L
ðiÞ ðiÞ
P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ ðiÞ
X ðiÞ X7 ðVD Þ
þ þ þ
RL LC ðiÞ
Lb wðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
P2 ðVD Þ P2 ðVD Þ
þ þ
RL LC
n 4 4
m 3 3
Status n>m n>m
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 259
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s þ k2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
B4 ðVD Þ s þ k ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s
ðiÞ
þ B5 ðVD Þg eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 3; n [ m
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k4 ; Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ k3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s þ k2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
B4 ðVD Þ s þ k ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ
p0 ðsÞ ¼ p1 ðsÞ ¼ p2 ðsÞ ¼ p3 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p4 ðsÞ ¼ 1; q0 ðsÞ ¼ B5 ðVD Þ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
q1 ðsÞ ¼ B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
q2 ðsÞ ¼ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s; q3 ðsÞ ¼ B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
c1 ðsÞ ¼ B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s; c2 ðsÞ ¼ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s; c3 ðsÞ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the varied arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 + c0 6¼ 0 for 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , i.e. k = 0 is not a of PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0.
Furthermore, P(k), Q(k) are analytic functions of k, for which the following
requirements of the analysis [BK] can also be verified in the present case:
(a) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R, then Pði xÞ þ Qði xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek
0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
260 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of F(x) = 0 is continuous and differentiable
respect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That
is for any real number x; pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0.
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x4
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ i fx ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s x3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ sg
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x4 x2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ i fx ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s x
3
½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ sg 6¼ 0
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
jPði x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 ; jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ fx2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þg2
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ fx ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s x3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ sg2
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
fx2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þg2 ¼ x4 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s2
k¼2 k¼2
ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ ½B5 ðVD Þ2 2 x2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s B5 ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ x6 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s2 þ x4 f½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s2
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
2 ½B4 ðVD Þ
B5 ðVD Þ
s ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ sg
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X 3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ x2 f½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s2 2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ 2
B5 ðVD Þg þ ½B5 ðVD Þ
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 261
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 x6 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s2
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
x4 f½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s2 2 ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ sg x2 f½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s2
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
2½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s B5 ðVD Þg ½B5 ðVD Þ2
k¼2
ðiÞ
H0 ¼ ½B5 ðVD Þ2 ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
H2 ¼ f½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s2 2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s B5 ðVD Þg
k¼2
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
H4 ¼ f½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s2 2 ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ sg
ðiÞ ðiÞ P
4
H6 ¼ ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s2 ; H8 ¼ 1. Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies H2k
k¼0
x2k ¼ 0.
And its roots are given by solving the above polynomial. Furthermore
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x4 ; PI ði x; sÞ ¼ 0;
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QR ði x; sÞ ¼ x2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ x ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s x3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3
ðiÞ
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sÞ ¼ k4 þ fk3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s þ k2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
B4 ðVD Þ s þ k ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s
ðiÞ
þ B5 ðVD Þg eks ; n ¼ 4; m ¼ 3; n [ m
262 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Pk ¼ k4 ; Qk ¼ k3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s þ k2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þk ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ P
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
k3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s þ k2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
Q(kÞ þ k ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þ
j j¼j j
PðkÞ k4
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s2
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ x4 f½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s2 2 ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ sg þ x2 f½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s2
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
2½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s B5 ðVD Þg þ ½B5 ðVD Þ2
k¼2
@Rek
^1 ðRf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . ¼ const
@L k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðLf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; L; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . ¼ const
@C k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðCf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; L; C; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . ¼ const
@Rb k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðCc Þ ¼ ð Þ ; L; C; Rb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . ¼ const
@Lb k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðRsb Þ ¼ ð Þ ; L; C; Rb ; Lb ; VV ; Vex ; m; s; . . . ¼ const
@RL k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; L; C; Rb ; Lb ; RL ; VV ; Vex ; m; . . . ¼ const
@s k¼ix
When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, and
inserting k ¼ i x.
264 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin x s ¼ gðxÞ ¼ ; cos x s ¼ hðxÞ
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
¼
jQði xÞj2
where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i x, and bearing i Pði xÞ ¼ Pði xÞ,
Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ then i Pk ði xÞ ¼ Px ði xÞ; i Qk ði xÞ ¼ Qx ði xÞ and
that on the surface jPði xÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 , one obtains:
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 265
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x4 ; PI ði x; sÞ ¼ 0;
X3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QR ði x; sÞ ¼ x2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þ
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ x ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s x3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
PRx ¼ 4 x3 ; PIx ¼ 0; QRx ¼ 2 x ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QIx ¼ ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s 3 x ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ s; PRs ¼ PIs ¼ 0
2
PRs PR ¼ 0; PIs PI ¼ 0;
ðiÞ
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QRs QR ¼ x2 B4 ðVD Þ fx2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þg
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
QIs QI ¼ fx B5 ðVD Þ þ x B3 ðVD Þg
3
fx ½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s
ðiÞ ðiÞ
x3 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ sg
X
3
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
PR PIx ¼ 0; PI PRx ¼ 0; QR QIx ¼ fx2 ½ Bk ðVD Þ B4 ðVD Þ s þ B5 ðVD Þg
k¼2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
f½B4 ðVD Þ B5 ðVD Þ s 3 x2 ½B1 ðVD Þ B3 ðVD Þ sg
U ¼ ðPR PIx PI PRx Þ ðQR QIx QI QRx Þj PR PIx ¼0 ¼ QR QIx þ QI QRx
PI PRx ¼0
Vjx¼s ¼ ðPR PIs PI PRs Þ ðQR QIs QI QRs Þj PR PIs ¼0 ¼ QR QIs þ QI QRs
PI PRs ¼0
Fx¼s ¼ 2 ½ðPRs PR þ PIs PI Þ ðQRs QR þ QIs QI Þj PRs PR ¼0 ¼ 2 ðQRs QR þ QIs QI Þ
PIs P¼0
Fx ¼ 2 ½ðPRx PR þ PIx PI Þ ðQRx QR þ QIx QI Þj PRx PR ¼4x7 ¼ 2 ½4 x7 ðQRx QR þ QIx QI Þ
PIx PI ¼0
@Rek @x Fs 2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ; ¼ xs ¼ ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g
@s @s Fx Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@s k¼ix
@x U @x
@s þ V
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g signfs þxþ g
@s jPj2
2.4 Tunnel Diode (TD) as a Microwave Oscillator System Cavity … 267
Exercises
1. A two-stage limiter circuit is shown in below figure. The limiter PIN diode at the
output (D2), commonly referred to as the “clean-up stage,” is the diode with
thinner I layer, selected so that the threshold level of the circuit is low enough to
protect the remainder of the receiver components. The limiter diode at the input
(D1), often called the “coarse limiter,” has a thicker I layer for several reasons.
The P layer diameter can be larger for a diode with a thicker I layer while
maintaining a capacitance value that produces low insertion loss under small
input signal conditions. The circuit components are connected by microstrip
segments. We consider for simplicity that the microstrip segments resistances
are neglected and either related voltages Vsk ! e, k = 1,…,5. Two limiter
diode’s equivalent circuit parameters are not the same. We consider coming
signal cause at t = 0 voltage V(t = 0).
268 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
Va ðtÞ ¼ Vain ðt s1 Þ;
X
2 X
3
Vb ðtÞ ¼ Va ðt s2 Þ ¼ Vain ðt si Þ; Vc ðtÞ ¼ Vb ðt s3 Þ ¼ Vain ðt si Þ
i¼1 i¼1
X
4
Vcout ðtÞ ¼ Vb ðt s4 Þ ¼ Vain ðt si Þ; IL ðtÞ ! IL ðt s5 Þ
i¼1
1 dV X
2
d V 2 X
3
Vi ðt s1 Þ ¼ ½ þ½ Ci 2 Li þ V
P
3 dt i¼1
dt i¼0
Ri
i¼1
2:1 Draw possible limiter circuits which can fulfil above system differential
equations. Vi—incoming RF signal voltage, Vo—out-going RF signal,
Exercises 269
3. We have active circulator of four ports, namely P1, P2, P3 and P4. Active cir-
culator is a four terminal device in which input from one port is transmitted to the
next port in rotation. The RF input signal is given at P1 of the circulator from the
left side. This signal from P1 is transmitted to P2. We can connect LC (L1, C1)
components in series to P2 port which results in phase shift and helps to reflect
the signal to P3 at the right. We can connect LC (L2, C2) components in series to
P3 port which results in phase shift and helps to reflect the signal to P4 at the
right. At P4 we get an output RF signal. Each active circulator terminal faces a
delay parasitic effect of signal transferring in time. Our circuit is a Reflection
Type Phase Shifter (RTPS), employing a circulator. The circuit configuration of
the active circulator used four MESFETs which are the GEC-Marconi standard
library cell F20-FET-4x75. A typical four ports decade bandwidth active cir-
culator has four MESFETs transistors interconnected with each other. RF, CF, LF,
CC, Rsb plays a major role in the working of the circuit. The four feedback
branches (RF, CF, LF) are used to link all the four transistors in an end to end
fashion. The source resistor (Rsb) is shared among all the three MESFETs
transistors and one transistor is source coupled with the other two transistors
using this source resistor.
270 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
3:1 Draw four ports active circulator configuration and equivalent circuits.
Write system differential equations.
3:2 Find system equilibrium points (fixed points), consider RFin signal
du1 1 x2 1
¼ 3 /ðVÞ cos x t ð Þ V sin x t
dt P x
½ Rk C1
k¼1
1 X
2
sin x t Vi ðt sk Þ
P
3 P
2
x½ Ck ½ Li k¼0
k¼1 i¼0
du2 1 x2 1
¼ 3 /ðVÞ sin x t ð Þ V cos x t
dt P x
½ Rk C1
k¼1
1 X
2
cos x t Vi ðt sk Þ
P
3 P
2
x½ Ck Li k¼0
k¼1 i¼0
Exercises 271
4:1 Find the analog basic Van der Pol equation and implement the system by
power limiter diodes and discrete components.
4:2 Discuss stability behavior and stability switching for variation of sk delay
parameter values (k = 0,1,2).
P
4:3 How the system dynamic and stability are changed for ½ 3k¼1 Rk ! 1?
P2
4:4 How the system dynamic and stability are changed for i¼0 Li ! e ?
P2
k¼0 sk ¼ s . How N parameter
N
4:5 Discuss system stability switching for
values influence our system stability switching.
RF ladder network
Structure antenna
RF Feeding
Rp
(no direct)
6:1 Find tunnel diodes system fixed points for the cases S3 = OFF/ON.
6:2 Find Tunnel diodes system differential equations for the cases
S3 = OFF/ON. How the system dynamic changes for two positions of
switch S3.
6:3 Find tunnel diodes system characteristic equations for two cases of S3
switch.
6:4 Discuss stability switching for variation of si ði ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ delay parameter
values.
6:5 How the system dynamical behavior changes if resistor RL is disconnected?
6:6 What happened if we bypass D2 tunnel diode (short) and S3 = ON con-
stantly? Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of s3
delay parameter.
274 2 Microwave Elements Description and Stability Analysis
The above schematic is Reddy’s bias stabilization scheme for sum mm- wave
RTD oscillators. Rb is the resistance of the bias line. Sd, Re and Ce are the
Schottky diode, external resistor and external capacitor, respectively, which
form stabilizing circuit. TML is the quarter wave length transmission line at the
oscillation frequency. RF load is pure resistive Rload and resonant circuit is
parallel LC circuit. We consider that Schottky diode current function is
qðVID RS Þ
ID ¼ IS ½e nKT 1 þ Gx V. n—Ideality factor, IS—Reverse saturation
current, k—Boltzman constant, T—Absolute temperature, V—Bias voltage,
GX ∙ V—Edge leakage current, ID RS —Voltage drop due to ohmic contact
and bulk resistance of semiconductor channel (Ohmic contact is a metal
semiconductor contact that has a linear I-V and non-rectifying characteristics).
Remark: You should consider RTD equation as in subchapter TD’s equation.
The input impedance of a transmission line of length L with characteristic
impedance Z0 and connected to load with impedance ZA (in our case ZA is RTD
element in parallel to RF load and resonant circuit).
Zin ðLÞ ¼ Z0 ½ZZA0 þþ jZ
jZ0 tgðbLÞ
A tgðbLÞ
; Z A ¼ ZAR þ j ZAI
Exercises 275
k
k ZA þ j Z0 tgð2p
k 4Þ Z02 k
Zin ðL ¼ Þ ¼ Z0 ½ k
¼ : Zin ðL ¼ Þ ¼ 50 Ohm
4 Z0 þ j ZA tgð k 4Þ
2p ZA 4
We know the values for ZAR and ZAI . Need to find Z0 expression.
7:1 Find Reddy’s bias stabilization Scheme fixed point and differential
equations.
7:2 Discuss stability switching for different values of s parameter (quarter wave
transmission line delay time).
7:3 What happened if Ce is disconnected? How the system dynamic change?
7:4 Find the following functions: K(Z0), K(ZA), K(Gx), K(VV), K(m).
Remark: VV and m parameters are RTD’s Internal parameters.
7:5 Discuss stability and dynamical behavior if Schottky diode Sd is shorted.
8. We have tunnel diodes system as a microwave oscillator. D1 and D2 are tunnel
diodes which are connected back to back configuration. There are two biasing
circuits (Vb1, Rb1 and Vb2, Rb2). Additionally there is a smart function element
which his voltage (VA − VB) is a complicated function of tunnel diodes cur-
rents respectively. TD’s parasitic effects cause to current time delays s1 and s2
pffiffiffi
respectively ID1 ðtÞ ! ID1 ðt s1 Þ ID2 ðtÞ ! ID2 ðt s2 Þ; s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s þ s.
At time t = 0 switch S1, S2 and S3 move to ON state. We consider for sim-
plicity, two tunnel diodes are identical (internal parameters are the same) and
TD’s current function is as discuss in the chapter.
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
VAB ¼ gðID1 ; ID2 Þ ¼ fmaxðID1 ; ID2 Þ þ ID1 ID2 g C; maxðID1 ; ID2 Þ
1 1
¼ ðID1 þ ID2 Þ þ jID1 ID2 j
2 2
9:1 Find system fixed points and differential equations for the three cases. Find
the related characteristic equations.
9:2 Discuss stability switching for different values of s1 and s2 time delay
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
parameters. How system dynamic changes for s1 ¼ s2 þ 1?
9:3 Find the following functions: K(s1 ), C(s2 ), K(L1), and K(C2).
9:4 D2 tunnel diode is disconnected, how system dynamical behavior changes?
Discuss stability and stability switching.
9:5 D1 tunnel diode is disconnected, how system dynamical behavior changes?
Discuss stability and stability switching.
10. We have the following custom TD’s current expression as a function of volt-
ages VDi. VDi represents specific TD’s voltage, the current which flow through
all TDs is the same (TDs are in series).
X
3
ID ¼ nðVD Þ ¼ gk ðVDi Þ
k¼1
P
2
Y
3 V
VDi Y
2 VDi þ 1 m
½ðgVDi Þ1 i¼1 ½ð V0 Þ
¼ Is f e th gþ f e g
i¼1
R0 i¼1
P
2
VDi Y
4 VDi VV
þ i¼1
f e½ Vex g
RV i¼2
Y
3 V
½ðgVDi Þ1
g1 ðVDi Þ ¼ Is f e th g;
i¼1
P
2 P
2
VDi Y
2 V þ1
VDi Y 4 VDi VV
½ð DiV Þm
g2 ðVDi Þ ¼ i¼1 f e 0 g; g3 ðVDi Þ ¼ i¼1 f e½ Vex g
R0 i¼1
RV i¼2
We connect our TDs in series to parallel LC resonant circuit and load Rload.
Additionally, we add biasing circuit (Vb, Rb).
10:1 Find system fixed points and differential equations.
10:2 Discuss system stability switching for different values of L, C resonant
circuit values.
10:3 One of the TD in series is shorted, How it influence our system dynamic?
Discuss fixed points and stability switching for different values of m
parameter.
(Hint: Discuss all possible cases for short TDs).
10:4 We define TD’s contact delays as sl ðl ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ respectively, Find K(sl ),
K(VV), K(Vex) functions.
Chapter 3
Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers
Analysis
Bipolar transistors are widely in use for many engineering applications. The bipolar
transistor consists of an N-doped semiconductors the emitter, a P-doped semicon-
ductor called the base, and an N – doped semiconductor called the collector. The
transistor consists of two PN junctions, one between the emitter and the base, the
other between the base and the collector. The base collector junction is reverse
biased by a rather large voltage. The emitter base junction is forward biased. When
the junction is reversed biased no current flows. Current begins to flow when the
junction is forward biased about specific voltage (*0.6 V). No current flows across
collector capacitance between the collector and emitter exists (Co). In addition, the
bonding wire connecting the transistor chip to the input and output microwave
transmission lines have inductance (Lin, Lo). The lower microwave frequency, the less
severe are the transit time effects, because the microwave cycle is longer and the
electrons have time to move through the transistor. At low microwave frequencies, the
base collector junction thickness can be made large and a higher voltage can be applied
and more power can be obtained at low microwave frequencies than at high micro-
wave frequencies. By using Ebers Moll transistor model (see S.M. Sze, Physics of
Semiconductor Devices), we get the following bipolar transistor at microwave fre-
quency equivalent circuit. X(t) is the microwave source input signal [24, 25, 33, 34].
IC ¼ Ic ; IE ¼ Ie .
IRC ¼ ICf þ IC þ IC0 þ ILout ; ILout ¼ IRL ; ILin þ ICf þ IRb ¼ Ib ; Alfa f ¼ af
Alfa R ¼ ar ; IC þ IDC af IDE ¼ 0; Ib ¼ IDC þ IDE ar IDC af IDE
Ib ¼ IDC ð1 ar Þ þ IDE ð1 af Þ; IDE ar IDC ¼ IE ; IC ¼ IDC þ af IDE
VCC VA1
ILin ¼ ICin ; VA2 ¼ VBE ; VA2 VA1 ¼ VBC ; ¼ IRC ;
RC
dIL
VA1 ¼ VLout þ VRL ¼ Lout out þ ILout RL
dt
dVA1 dVCf Vbb VA2
I C0 ¼ C 0 ; VA4 ¼ Vbb ; VA1 VA2 ¼ VCf ; ICf ¼ Cf ; ¼ IR b
dt dt Rb
dILin dVCin
XðtÞ VA2 ¼ VLin þ VCin ; VLin ¼ Lin ; ICin ¼ Cin ; XðtÞ VA3 ¼ VLin
dt dt
Vbe Vbc
VA2 VA3 ¼ VCin ; VA4 ¼ Vbb ; IDE ¼ ISE ½eð VT Þ 1; IDC ¼ ISC ½eð VT Þ 1
dILout
VCC ½Lout þ ILout RL dVCf
dt
¼ Cf þ IC
RC dt
d dIL
þ C0 ½Lout out þ ILout RL þ ILout
dt dt
dILout
VCC Lout dt ILout RL dVCf
¼ Cf þ IC
RC dt
d 2 ILout dILout
þ C0 ½Lout þ RL þ ILout
dt2 dt
ILin þ ICf þ IRb ¼ Ib ; ILin ¼ ICin ) ICin þ ICf þ IRb ¼ Ib
dVCin dVCf Vbb VA2
) Cin þ Cf þ ¼ Ib
dt dt Rb
dIL
VA1 VA2 ¼ VCf ) VA2 ¼ VA1 VCf ¼ Lout out þ ILout RL VCf ;
dt
then we get
dI
dVCin dVCf Vbb fLout dtLout þ ILout RL VCf g
ðÞ Cin þ Cf þ ¼ Ib
dt dt Rb
XðtÞ VA2 ¼ VLin þ VCin ) VCin ¼ XðtÞ VA2 VLin
dIL dILin
¼ XðtÞ fLout out þ ILout RL VCf g Lin
dt dt
dILout dILin
VCin ¼ XðtÞ Lout ILout RL þ VCf Lin
dt dt
dVCin dXðtÞ d 2 ILout dILout dVCf d 2 ILin
ðÞ ¼ Lout 2
RL þ Lin
dt dt dt dt dt dt2
d 2 ILout dILout dVCf 2 dVCf
Cin fdXðtÞ
dt Lout dt2 dt RL þ dt Lin d dtILin
2 g þ Cf dt
ðÞ ! ðÞ dIL
Vbb fLout outþ ILout RL VCf g
þ dt
Rb ¼ Ib
dILout
Vbe ¼ VA2 ¼ Lout þ ILout RL VCf ; Vbc ¼ VA2 VA1 ¼ VCf
dt
IS V
ð bc Þ
V
ð be Þ
IC ¼ IDC þ af IDE ¼ ½e VT 1 þ IS ½e VT 1
ar
dILout
VC Lout þ ILout RL VC
IS f dt f
¼ ½eð VT Þ 1 þ IS ½eð VT Þ
1
ar
dILout
Lout þ ILout RL VC VC
IS Vbe IS Vbc IS dt f IS f
IB ¼ ½eð VT Þ 1 þ ½eð VT Þ 1 ¼ ½eð VT Þ
1 þ ½eð VT Þ 1
bf br bf br
dILout dVCf
We define new variables: Y1 ¼ dt ; Y2 ¼ dt
dY1 1 1 1 Cf RL 1
¼ ½VCC Y1 R L Y2 Y1 IL
dt RC C0 Lout C0 Lout Lout C0 Lout out
1
n ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ
C0 Lout 1
dY1 1 1 1 Cf RL 1
¼ ½VCC Y1 RL Y2 Y1 IL
dt RC C0 Lout C0 Lout Lout C0 Lout out
1
n ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ
C0 Lout 1
dY3 Lout Cf RL 1
¼ ½RL þ Y1 þ ½1 þ Y2 ILout þ VCf
dt Rb Cin Cin Rb Cin Rb Cin
1 Vbb dXðtÞ
n ðVCf ; Y1 ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ þ þ
Cin 2 Rb Cin dt
dILin 1 Lout dIL dVCf
¼ Y3 Y1 ; out ¼Y1 ; ¼ Y2
dt Lin Lin dt dt
dY1 1 1 1 1 1
¼0) ½VCC RL I
dt RC C0 Lout C0 Lout Lout C0 Lout
n1 ðVCf ; Y1 ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ ¼ 0
dY3 RL 1 1
¼ 0 ) ILout þ VCf
dt Rb Cin Rb Cin Cin
Vbb dXðtÞ
n2 ðVCf ; Y1 ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ þ þ ¼0
Rb Cin dt
V I RL V
IS Cf Lout Cf
n1 ðVCf ; Y1 ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ ¼ ½eð VT Þ
1 þ IS ½e ð VT Þ
1
ar
I R V V
Lout L
IS Cf
IS Cf
n2 ðVCf ; Y1 ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ ¼ ½eð VT Þ
1 þ ½eð VT Þ
1
bf br
1 1 1 1 1
½VCC RL ILout
RC C0 Lout C0 Lout C0 Lout
V I RL V
IS Cf Lout Cf
f ½eð VT Þ
1 þ IS ½eð VT Þ
1g ¼ 0
ar
I R V
Lout L
RL 1 1 IS ð
Cf
Þ
ILout þ VCf f ½e VT
1
Rb Cin Rb Cin Cin bf
V
IS Cf
Vbb
þ ½eð VT Þ
1g þ ¼0
br Rb Cin
Our system fixed points are E ðÞ ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; ILout VCf Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; ILout ; VCf Þ . We
V
Cf
need to find the expressions for ILout ; VCf . First exponent is eð VT Þ
. We define new
VC
exponent argument VT
f
¼ C1 ) eC1 1 C1 by using Taylor series approxima-
tion. We define our Taylor series approximation in the interval 0\C1 \1 )
V
VC ð
Cf
Þ VC
0\ VT
f
\1 ) 0\VCf \VT )e VT
1 VT
f
. Second exponent is
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 287
I RL V
ð
Lout Cf
Þ ILout RL VC
e VT
. We define new exponent argument VT
f
¼ C2 and there are two
ILout RL VC ILout RL VC ILout RL VC
cases: VT
f
[ 0 and VT
f
\0. First case VT
f
[ 0 ) VT ¼
VC
26 mV ) ILout RL VCf [ 0 ) RL [ f
ILout and by using Taylor series approxi-
I RL V
ð
Lout Cf
Þ ILout RL VC ILout RL VC
mation: eC2 ¼ e VT
1þ VT
f
. Second case VT
f
\0 ) VT ¼
VC
26 mV ) ILout RL VCf \0 ) 0\RL \ f
ILout and by using Taylor series
approximation:
I RL V
Lout Cf
C2 jC2 j ð Þ
e j C \0
2
¼e ¼1 jC2 j ¼e VT
I RL V
ð
Lout Cf
Þ
ILout RL VCf
eC2 jC2 \0 ¼ ejC2 j ¼ 1 jC2 j ¼ e VT
1j jC2 \0
VT
ILout RL VCf
¼ 1þ
VT
1 1 IS IL IS RL IS VCf
ð#Þ ! Lout ½VCC RL ILout f VCf þ out g¼0
RC Lout ar V T VT VT
1 VC IS IS RL
½VCC Lout RL þ f ½IS ILout ½ þ 1 ¼ 0 ) ILout
RC VT ar VT
VC
1
RC ½VCC Lout RL þ VT
f
½IS aISr
¼
½ISVRT L þ 1
288 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
IS ILout RL VCf IS VC
ð##Þ ! ILout RL þ VCf Rb f ½ f g þ Vbb ¼ 0
bf VT br VT
IS ILout RL VCf IS
ILout RL þ VCf Rb ½ þ Rb V þ Vbb ¼ 0
bf VT br VT Cf
IS 1 IS IS
VCf ½1 þ Rb þ Rb ILout RL ½Rb þ 1 þ Vbb ¼ 0
bf VT br VT bf VT
IS IS
VC ½1 þ Rb b þ Rb b þ Vbb
f VT r VT
ILout ¼ f
IS . We have two expressions for ILout then
RL ½Rb b þ 1
f VT
V
Cf IS IS
RC ½VCC Lout RL þ VT
1 I
½IS aSr VC ½1 þ Rb b þ Rb b þ Vbb
f VT r VT
IS RL ¼ f
IS
½ V þ 1 RL ½Rb b V þ 1
T f T
1 IS VC 1 IS
½VCC Lout RL RL ½Rb þ 1 þ f IS ½1 RL ½Rb þ 1
RC bf VT VT ar b f VT
IS IS I S RL IS R L
¼ VCf ½1 þ Rb þ Rb ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1 Vbb
b f VT br VT VT VT
1 1 IS Rb I S 1 1 I S RL
VCf f IS ½1 RL ½Rb þ 1 ½1 þ ð þ Þ ½ þ 1g
VT ar bf VT VT bf br VT
I S RL 1 IS
¼½ þ 1 Vbb ½VCC Lout RL RL ½Rb þ 1
VT RC bf VT
½ISVRT L þ 1 Vbb R1C ½VCC Lout RL RL ½Rb b IVS T þ 1
VCf ’ Rb IS
f
1
VT IS ½1 a1r RL ½Rb b IVS T þ 1 ½1 þ VT ðb1 þ b1 Þ ½ISVRT L þ 1
f f r
Vbb
þ
RL ½Rb b IVS T þ 1
f
There is other way to find our system fixed points. First we write our system
differential equations:
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 289
dILout dIL 1 RL
VA1 ¼ Lout þ ILout RL ) out ¼ VA1 ILout
dt dt Lout Lout
dVA1 dVA1 1 1
IC0 ¼ C0 ) ¼ I C0 ¼ ðIRC ICf IC ILout Þ; ICf ¼ Ib IRb ILin
dt dt C0 C0
1 1
I C0 ¼ ðIRC ½Ib IRb ILin IC ILout Þ
C0 C0
1
¼ ðIRC ½Ib þ IC þ IRb þ ILin ILout Þ
C0
VCC VA1 1 1 VCC VA1
¼ IRC ) I C0 ¼ ð ½Ib þ IC þ IRb þ ILin ILout Þ
RC C0 C0 RC
Vbb VA2 1 1 VCC VA1 Vbb VA2
¼ IR b ) I C0 ¼ ð ½Ib þ IC þ ½ þ ILin ILout Þ
Rb C0 C0 RC Rb
dILout dIL
IC ¼ n1 ¼ n1 ðVCf ; ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ; Ib ¼ n2 ¼ n2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt dt
dVA1 1 VCC VA1 dILout
¼ ð ½n2 ðVCf ; ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt C0 RC dt
dIL Vbb VA2
þ n1 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ þ ½ þ ILin ILout Þ;
dt Rb
VA1 VA2 ¼ VCf ) VA2 ¼ VA1 VCf
dVA1 1 VCC VA1 dIL
¼ ð ½n2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt C0 RC dt
dIL Vbb ðVA1 VCf Þ
þ n1 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ þ ½ þ ILin ILout Þ
dt Rb
dILout 1 RL
¼ VA1 ILout
dt Lout Lout
dVA1 1 VCC VA1 dIL
¼ ð ½n2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt C0 RC dt
dIL Vbb ðVA1 VCf Þ
þ n1 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ þ ½ þ ILin ILout Þ
dt Rb
dVCf 1 dIL Vbb ðVA1 VCf Þ
¼ ðn2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ ½ ILin Þ
dt Cf dt Rb
dILin 1 dVCin 1
¼ ðXðtÞ ½VA1 VCf VCin Þ; ¼ ILin
dt Lin dt Cin
We consider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |fX(t)| <=1 and A0 > > |
fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 .
A0 ½VA1 VCf VCin ¼ 0; VA1
ILout RL ¼ 0;
dILout Vbb ðVA1 VCf Þ
n2 ðVCf ; ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ ½ ¼0
dt Rb
VCC VA1 dIL dIL
½n2 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ þ n1 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ
RC dt dt
Vbb ðVA1 VCf Þ
þ½ ILout ¼ 0; VA1
ILout RL ¼ 0 ) VA1
¼ ILout RL
Rb
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 291
dILout
A0 ½ILout RL VCf VCin ¼ 0; n2 ðVCf ; ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt
Vbb ðILout RL VCf Þ
½ ¼0
Rb
VCC ILout RL dIL
½n2 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
RC dt
dIL Vbb ðILout RL VCf Þ
þ n1 ðVCf ; out ¼ 0; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ þ ½ ILout ¼ 0
dt Rb
And we can find analytically or numerically our fixed points (equilibrium points)
value: VCf ; ILout . Additionally ILin
¼ 0; VA1
¼ ILout RL .
Stability analysis: We define the following functions:
1 RL
f1 ðVA1 ; ILout ; VCf ; ILin ; VCin Þ ¼ VA1 ILout
Lout Lout
1 VCC VA1 dIL
f2 ðVA1 ; ILout ; VCf ; ILin ; VCin Þ ¼ ð ½n2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
C0 RC dt
dILout Vbb ðVA1 VCf Þ
þ n1 ðVCf ; ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ þ ½ þ ILin ILout Þ
dt Rb
1 dIL
f3 ðVA1 ; ILout ; VCf ; ILin ; VCin Þ ¼ ðn2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
Cf dt
Vbb ðVA1 VCf Þ
½ ILin Þ
Rb
1
f4 ðVA1 ; ILout ; VCf ; ILin ; VCin Þ ¼ ðXðtÞ ½VA1 VCf VCin Þ;
Lin
1
f5 ðVA1 ; ILout ; VCf ; ILin ; VCin Þ ¼ ILin
Cin
VA1 ¼ VA1 ðtÞ; ILout ¼ ILout ðtÞ; VCf ¼ VCf ðtÞ; ILin ¼ ILin ðtÞ; VCin ¼ VCin ðtÞ
dIL dIL
n1 ¼ n1 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; ar ; . . .Þ; n2 ¼n2 ðVCf ; out ; ILout ; IS ; bf ; . . .Þ
dt dt
@VA1 @VCin
@f1
¼
@VCin
292 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
@n2 IS VC
f 1 VA1 1 @n2 IS VA1 VC
f
¼ eð VT Þ ½ e VT þ ; ¼ eð VT Þ
@VCf VT bf br @VA1 bf VT
@f2 1 @f2 1
N22 ¼ ¼ ; N23 ¼ ¼
@ILout C0 @VCf C0
@n2 @n1 1 1 1 @ X 2
ð½ þ þ Þ ¼ ½ ð n Þ
@VCf @VCf Rb C0 Rb @VCf k¼1 k
@ X 2
IS ðVV Cf Þ 1 VA1 1 VA1 1
ð nk Þ ¼ e T f½ e VT ½ e VT þ g
@VCf k¼1 VT ar bf br
IS ðVV Cf Þ 1 1 VA1 1
¼ e T ½ e VT ð1 þ Þ
VT a r br bf
@f2 1 1 @ X 2
N23 ¼ ¼ ½ ð n Þ
@VCf C0 Rb @VCf k¼1 k
1 1 IS ðVV Cf Þ 1 1 VA1 1
¼ f e T ½ e VT ð1 þ Þg
C0 Rb VT a r br bf
@f2 1 @f2 @f3
N24 ¼ ¼ ; N25 ¼ ¼ 0; N31 ¼
@ILin C0 @VCin @VA1
1 @n2 1 1 IS VA1 VC
f 1
¼ ð þ Þ¼ ð eð VT Þ þ Þ
Cf @VA1 Rb Cf bf VT Rb
@f3 @f3 1 @n 1
N32 ¼ ¼ 0; N33 ¼ ¼ ð 2 Þ
@ILout @VCf Cf @VCf Rb
1 IS ðVCf Þ 1 VA1 1 1
¼ ð e VT ½ e VT þ þ Þ
Cf VT bf br Rb
@f3 1 @f3 1 Vbb ðVA1 VCf Þ
N34 ¼ ¼ ; N35 ¼ ¼ 0; f3 ¼ ðn2 ½ ILin Þ
@ILin Cf @VCin Cf Rb
E ðVA1
; ILout
; VCf
; ILin
; VCin
Þ ¼ ðILout
RL ; ILout
; VCf
; 0; VCin Þ
Our system Jacobian elements for our fixed points coordinates are:
1 RL 1 1
N11 ¼ ; N12 ¼ ; N13 ¼ 0; N14 ¼ 0; N15 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ ; N24 ¼
Lout Lout C0 C0
I RL V
1 1 1 IS 1 Lout Cf
N21 ¼ ð þ þ ½1 þ eð VT Þ Þ; N25 ¼ 0; N32 ¼ 0
C0 RC Rb VT bf
1 1 IS ðVV Cf Þ 1 1 I R
Lout L
N23 ¼ f e T ½ e VT
C0 Rb VT a r br
I R V
1 1 IS Lout L Cf 1
ð1 þ Þg; N31 ¼ ð eð VT Þ þ Þ
bf Cf bf VT Rb
V
1 IS Cf 1 ILout RL 1 1
N33 ¼ ð eð VT Þ ½ e VT þ þ Þ;
Cf V T bf br Rb
1 1
N34 ¼ ; N35 ¼ 0; N54 ¼ ; N55 ¼ 0
Cf Cin
1 1 1
N41 ¼ ; N42 ¼ 0; N43 ¼ ; N44 ¼ 0; N45 ¼ ; N51 ¼ 0; N52 ¼ 0; N53 ¼ 0
Lin Lin Lin
0 1 0 @f1 @f1 1
N11 ... N15 @VA1 ... @VCin
B . C B C
.. ... C B . .. .. C
A ¼ B
@ .. . A j @E ðVA1
¼ B .. . . C j @E ðVA1
;ILout ;VCf ;ILin ;VCin Þ @ A ;ILout ;VCf ;ILin ;VCin Þ
N51 N55 @f5 @f5
¼ ðILout RL ; ILout ; VCf ; 0; VCin Þ @VA1 @VCin
¼ ðILout RL ; ILout ; VCf ; 0; VCin Þ
0 1
N31 C1f 0 !
B 1 C k L1in 1 L1in L1in
detB
@ Lin k L1in C
A ¼ N
31 det þ
1
Cin k Cf 0 k
0 1
Cin k
1 1 1 N31
¼ N31 ðk2 þ Þþ k ¼ N31 k2 þ kþ
Cin Lin Cf Lin Cf Lin Cin Lin
0 1
N31 ðN33 kÞ 0 1 1
B 1 C L1in Lin L1in
det@ L1in 1
Lin A ¼ N 31 Lin
ðN 33 kÞ
Lin
0 k 0 k
0 0 k
N 1 1 1
¼ 31 k ðN33 kÞ k¼ k2 k ðN31 þ N33 Þ
Lin Lin Lin Lin
296 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
1 1
det jA k Ij ¼ ð kÞ ðN22 kÞ fk3 þ N33 k2 k
Lout Lin
1 1 N33
ð þ Þþ g
Cin Cf Cin Lin
RL 1 1 1 N33
þ fN21 ½k3 þ N33 k2 k ð þ Þþ
Lout Lin Cin Cf Cin Lin
1
N23 ðN31 k2 þ k
Cf Lin
N31 1 1 1
þ Þþ ½ k2 k ðN31 þ N33 Þg
Cin Lin C0 Lin Lin
1 N
det jA k Ij ¼ ½k2 k ð þ N22 Þ þ 22
Lout Lout
1 1 1 N33
½k3 þ N33 k2 k ð þ Þþ
Lin Cin Cf Cin Lin
RL 1 1 1
þ fk3 N21 þ N21 N33 k2 k N21 ð þ Þ
Lout Lin Cin Cf
N N N23
þ 21 33 N23 N31 k2 k
Cin Lin Cf Lin
N N 1 1
31 23 þ k2 k ðN31 þ N33 Þg
Cin Lin Lin C0 Lin C0
1 N
det jA k Ij ¼ ½k2 k ð þ N22 Þ þ 22
Lout Lout
1 1 1 N33
½k þ N33 k k
3 2
ð þ Þþ
Lin Cin Cf Cin Lin
RL 1
þ fk3 N21 þ k2 ½N21 N33 N23 N31 þ
Lout Lin C0
1 1 1 N 1
k ½N21 ð þ Þ þ 23 þ ðN31 þ N33 Þ
Lin Cin Cf Cf C0
1
þ ½N21 N33 N31 N23 g
Cin Lin
3.1 Bipolar Transistor at Microwave Frequencies … 297
1 1 1 N33
det jA k Ij ¼ k5 þ N33 k4 k3 ð þ Þ þ k2
Lin Cin Cf Cin Lin
1 1 1 1 1 1
þ k4 ð þ N22 Þ k3 ð þ N22 Þ N33 þ k2 ð þ Þð þ N22 Þ
Lout Lout Lin Cin Cf Lout
1 N33 N N
kð þ N22 Þ k3 22 þ 22 N33 k2 k
Lout Cin Lin Lout Lout
1 N22 1 1 N33 N22
ð þ Þþ
Lin Lout Cin Cf Cin Lin Lout
RL RL 1
þ k3 N þ k2 ½N21 N33 N23 N31 þ
Lout 21 Lout Lin C0
RL 1 1 1 N 1
k ½N21 ð þ Þ þ 23 þ ðN31 þ N33 Þ
Lout Lin Cin Cf Cf C0
1 RL
þ ½N21 N33 N31 N23
Cin Lin Lout
1
det jA k Ij ¼ k5 þ k4 ½N33 þ þ N22 k3
Lout
1 1 1 1 N RL
½ ð þ Þþð þ N22 Þ N33 þ 22 þ N
Lin Cin Cf Lout Lout Lout 21
N33 1 1 1 1 N
þ k2 f þ ð þ Þð þ N22 Þ þ 22
Cin Lin Lin Cin Cf Lout Lout
R 1
N33 þ ½N21 N33 N23 N31 þ
L
g
Lout Lin C0
1 N33 1 N22 1 1
k fð þ N22 Þ þ ð þ Þ
Lout Cin Lin Lin Lout Cin Cf
RL 1 1 1 N 1
þ ½N21 ð þ Þ þ 23 þ ðN31 þ N33 Þg
Lout Lin Cin Cf Cf C0
N33 N 1 RL
þ 22 þ ½N21 N33 N31 N23
Cin Lin Lout Cin Lin Lout
1 1 1 1
X5 ¼ 1; X4 ¼ N33 þ þ N22 ; X3 ¼ ½ ð þ Þ
Lout Lin Cin Cf
1 N RL
þð þ N22 Þ N33 þ 22 þ N
Lout Lout Lout 21
N33 1 1 1 1
X2 ¼ þ ð þ Þð þ N22 Þ
Cin Lin Lin Cin Cf Lout
N RL 1
þ 22 N33 þ ½N21 N33 N23 N31 þ
Lout Lout Lin C0
1 N33 1 N22 1 1
X1 ¼ fð þ N22 Þ þ ð þ Þ
Lout Cin Lin Lin Lout Cin Cf
RL 1 1 1 N 1
þ ½N21 ð þ Þ þ 23 þ ðN31 þ N33 Þg;
Lout Lin Cin Cf Cf C0
N33 N 1 RL
X0 ¼ 22 þ ½N21 N33 N31 N23
Cin Lin Lout Cin Lin Lout
X
5 X
5
det jA k Ij ¼ ki Xi ; det jA k Ij ¼ 0 ) ki Xi ¼ 0 ) k1 ; k2 ; . . .
i¼0 i¼0
Table 3.1 Bipolar transistor at microwave frequencies system stability fixed points and
eigenvalues
System Eigen values System fixed point classification
P
5
( ki Xi ¼ 0 ) k1 ; k2 ; . . .; kn )
i¼0
Number of eigenvalues is n
1 λk > 0 and real 8 k 2 ½1; . . .; n Unstable node
n, k are integers
2 λk < 0 and real 8 k 2 ½1; . . .; n Stable node
n, k are integers
3 At least one Eigen value is negative real Saddle point
number (λl < 0) and all other Eigenvalues
are positive real number λk > 0
8 k 2 ½1; . . .; n; n, k, l are integers, λl < 0;
0 l n; n; l 2 ½0; . . .; n
4 λk < 0 and real 8k 2 ½1; . . .; n Stable spiral (decay oscillation spiral). If at
n, k are integers except λl, λm list one of our Eigenvalues is positive then
kl ¼ c1 þ j c2 ; km ¼ c1 j c2 we have Saddle point spiral
0 l n; 0 m n; l; m 2 ½1; . . .; n
n, m are integer numbers
c1 \0; c2 [ 0 and real number
l 6¼ m & c1 ¼ Reðkm;n Þ\0
5 λk < 0 and real 8k 2 ½1; . . .; n Unstable spiral (growing oscillation spiral)
n, k are integers except λl, λm
kl ¼ c1 þ j c2 ; km ¼ c1 j c2
0 l n; 0 m n; l; m 2 ½1; . . .; n
(continued)
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 299
There are three major types of FETs. First type is Junction FET (JFET). The second
type is the metal oxide semiconductor FET (MOSFET). MOSFETs transistor is
widely use as discrete devices in UHF band communications. The third type is
Schottky barrier type FETs made of gallium arsenide. It is known as the Gallium
Arsenide Metal semiconductor FET (GaAs MESFET) which showed performances
better than bipolar transistor. GaAs MESFET provide lower noise and higher gain for
solid state applications, frequency characteristics previously unavailable from bipolar
transistor. It is made by using gallium arsenide. The electron mobility of gallium
arsenide is five to seven times that of silicon. The GaAs FET is different from the
MOSFET by the use of schottky barrier at the gate instead of an oxide layer. GaAs FET
are called “Normally ON” type device, the maximum gate voltage must be zero. The
design of microwave circuits includes active components GaAs MESFET’s and GaAs
or InP based MOD-FET’s. Small Signal Model (SSM’s) are used as a building block
for large signal modeling nonlinear circuits like power amplifiers, mixers, oscillators,
etc., There are equivalent circuit elements which required if small signal broadband
behavior of microwave and millimeter wave FET’s has to be modeled. Optimization is
done by using nonlinear dynamic. The FET is fabricated on a semi insulating sub-
strate, which serves as the transistor support. An epitaxial layer of N-doped semi-
conductor material is deposited on top of the substrate, and practically the FET is built
into epitaxial layer. The FET’s ports are source, gate and drain. The source is at one
end of the transistor, and the drain is at other end. We connect positive voltage to the
drain, and electrons are drawn from the source to the drain. The gate is between the
source and drain on the surface of the epitaxial layer. Microwave FET is constructed
from a metal to semiconductor junction (Schottky junction) at the gate. Another name
to microwave FET is MESFET (gate is a metal to semiconductor junction). FET
300 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
semiconductor material is GaAs and silicon not recommended since electrons travel
twice as fast in GaAs as in silicon. Better high frequency performance is obtained in
GaAs FET. Microwave FETs are made with GaAs and called GaAs FETs. When the
source to gate voltage is zero, the electrons move through the entire thickness of the
epitaxial layer and the FET draws the maximum current, saturated drain to source
current IDSS. A microwave FET operated with its gate voltage negative with respect to
its source voltage. A reversed biased Schottky junction is formed around the gate.
Increasing the negative voltage on the gate causes the size of the insulating barrier
region increases, and reducing the current flow from the source to the drain. If the gate
voltage is negative enough, the insulating region around the gate extend across the
entire epitaxial layer and cut off the current flow. FET amplification is performing
because a small voltage applied to the gate controls a large amount of current which
flowing through the transistor. This current used to generate a large voltage in the
output circuit. We interested on the properties of a GaAs MESFET. A linear amplifier
circuit biases the GaAs MESFET. Considering gate bias alone, the range must be from
IDSS, VG = 0 to IDS = 0 at pinch off, VG = VP. FET square law characteristic is done
according to the formula ID ¼ IDSS ð1 VVGSP Þ2 . In this range, the voltage VDS between
the drain and the source has little effect on the current IDS flowing through the channel.
By changing the gate voltage, VG, the drain to source current can be controlled. There
is a transfer characteristic of a GaAs FET with n channels. This FET transfer char-
acteristic is an important basic parameter in circuit design because it sets the bias
conditions and operating point. The operating point line is directly related to the
mutual conductance gm. Mutual conductance is defined as the ratio of the change in
direct current to the minor change in voltage between gate sources. We differentiate ID
@ID
expression with respect to VGS: gm ¼ @V GS
¼ 2 IDSS ð1 VVGSP Þ ð V1P Þ ¼
2IDSS
VP ð1 VVGSP Þ. The most important characteristic when designing a bias circuit for
small signal GaAs FETs is transfer characteristic. There are two methods to bias a
GaAs FET: dual power source method and self-bias method (Auto-bias) [37, 62].
Dual power source: VP \VGS \0 must always apply to a GaAs FET, and we get
qffiffiffiffiffiffi
the expression for VGS, VGS ¼ VP ð1 IDSS ID
Þ.
Self-bias method (Auto-Bias): This is the most universal method for reducing
electrical potential between a gate and the source when there is only one power
source. If the source resistance is RS, and the operating current is ID, then the drop
in electric potential caused by RS is ID RS and the actual electrical potential
between the gate and the source is VGS ¼ ID RS . VGS is negative and the FET can
be turned on. We can get the value for RS:
qffiffiffiffiffiffi
RS ¼ VIDGS ¼ I1D VP ð1 IDSS
ID
Þ. We implement a system of RF FET typical
Band 2 amplifier. We have two bias voltages: VG < 0, VD > 0, input and output
capacitors Cin, Cout, Microwave RF source X(t) and series resistance Rin. The dual
power source bias method (VG < 0, VD > 0) is appropriate for use in higher fre-
quencies. When we connect the source to the ground terminal, source inductance
can be made relatively small. By using this method, higher gain can be obtained and
a lower noise factor anticipated in the higher frequencies. A large DC voltage is
applied between the source and the drain, and the drain is positive with respect to
the source. The gate is biased at a DC negative voltage, which shows IDS as a
function of the gate voltage, current flows through the FET and through RD drain
resistor. In the FET none of the transistor current flows into the gate circuit, because
the gate junction is reverse biased. In a bipolar transistor, a small of the emitter
current flows into the base. The current flowing from the drain to the source, which
is opposite to electron current flow. The gate length determines the transit time of
the FET. The increased power is obtained by using multiple sources, gates, and
drains. We consider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |fX(t)| 1 and
A0 |fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 .
Remark: The Microwave applications implementation for GaAs FET is rec-
ommended since it has a greatest advantage in the higher frequency band. GaAs
FETs are far better in term of noise, gain and output power saturation characteristics
compare to silicon bipolar transistor and tunnel diodes. Most small signal FETs are
in low noise amplifiers. They are used over the horizon microwave
Fig. 3.6 Small signal enhance equivalent circuit for FET (version 1)
The above FET equivalent circuits are for high frequency model and operation,
taking the node capacitors and other elements into account. If we switch to low
frequency small signal FET model, all capacitors in the above model disconnected
and all inductors are short. Capacitor impedance is Zc ¼ xC
1
; lim Zc ) lim xC
1
!
x!e x!e
1 and for inductance impedance is Zl ¼ x L Zl ¼ x L ) lim x L ! e. We get
x!e
the low frequency small signal FET model.
Fig. 3.7 Small signal enhance equivalent circuit for FET (version 2)
304 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
Fig. 3.8 Small signal equivalent circuit for FET (Rgs and Rgd disconnected)
More restricted low frequency small signal FET model is taking Rs, Rg, and Rd
small and we neglect them. The range of parameter values for an FET is present in
the below table:
Rgs and Rgd are high resistance elements which can be taken as disconnected in
our low frequency small signal model.
A High-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT), also known as hetero-structure
FET (HFET) or modulation-doped FET (MODFET), is a field-effect transistor
incorporating a junction between two materials with different band gaps (i.e. a
hetero-junction) as the channel instead of a doped region (as is generally the case
for MOSFET). A commonly used material combination is GaAs with AlGaAs,
though there is wide variation, dependent on the application of the device. Devices
incorporating more indium generally show better high-frequency performance,
while in recent years, gallium nitride HEMTs have attracted attention due to their
high-power performance. HEMT transistors are able to operate at higher frequen-
cies than ordinary transistors, up to millimeter wave frequencies, and are used in
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 305
high-frequency products. The minimum, maximum and optimal values for each
parameter of the model used for PHEMT SSM (Small Signal Model) Optimization
([62], Fundamental theory and applications, Vol. 43, No. 10, October 1996) is
describe in the below table. Femtofarads (1 fF = 0.001 pF = 10−15 F). Ω—Ohm.
The unit for the conductance (g) is defined by S ¼ X1 ¼ A=V (A—ampere, V—
voltage). Mho is an alternative name of the same unit, the reciprocal of one ohm.
Mho is derived from spelling ohm backwards and is written with an upside-down
capital Greek letter Omega [62].
We do our circuit analysis only for second equivalent circuit topology (full
version) which is high frequency model and good for Input microwave source X(t).
id ¼ gm v ejxTau ; lim id ¼ gm v; lim ejxTau ¼ 1. We describe our circuit
Tau!e Tau!e
nodes Kirchhoff’s current law and elements equations in the below tables.
P
n
Ik ¼ 0; n is the total number of branches with currents flowing towards or
k¼1
away from the node.
Table 3.4 PHEMT SSM (Small Signal Model) circuit nodes and Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL)
Circuit node P
n
Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL) - Ik ¼ 0
k¼1
A1 IRin ¼ ICin
A2 VA2 ¼ Vg
A3 ILg ¼ ICpgd þ IRg þ ICpgs
A4 IRg ¼ IRgs þ ICgs þ IRgd þ ICgd
A5 ICgs ¼ IRi
A6 ICgd ¼ IRdi
A7 IRgd þ IRdi ¼ IRd þ IRds þ ICds þ gm v
A8 IRd þ ICpgd ¼ ILd þ ICpds
A9 IRgs þ ICgs þ gm v þ ICds þ IRds ¼ IRs
A10 IRs ¼ ILs
A11 ILd þ IRd1 ¼ ICout ¼ IRL
A12 VA12 ¼ Vd
Table 3.5 PHEMT SSM (Small Signal Model) circuit elements and elements related equations
Circuit Element related equation Circuit Element related equation
element element
Rin XðtÞVA1
Rin ¼ IRin Ri IRi ¼ VA5RV
i
A9
Cin ICin ¼ Cin dtd ðVA1 þ Vg Þ Cds ICds ¼ Cds dtd ðVA7 VA9 Þ
Lg Vg VA3 ¼ Lg
dILg
dt
Rds IRds ¼ VA7RV
ds
A9
Cpgs dVCpgs
ICpgs ¼ Cpgs dt ¼ Cpgs dVdtA3 Rd IRd ¼ VA7RV
d
A8
Cpgd ICpgd ¼ Cpgd dtd ðVA3 VA8 Þ Cpds ICpds ¼ Cpds dVdtA8
Rgd IRgd ¼ VA4RV
gd
A7 RS IRs ¼ VA9 V
RS
A10
XðtÞ VA1
¼ IRin ) XðtÞ VA1 ¼ Rin IRin ) VA1 ¼ XðtÞ Rin IRin
Rin
d dVA1 dVA1 1
ICin ¼ Cin ðVA1 þ Vg Þ ) ICin ¼ Cin ) ¼ ICin
dt dt dt Cin
dILg dILg 1
Vg VA3 ¼ Lg ) ¼ ðVg þ VA3 Þ;
dt dt Lg
dVA3 dVA3 1
ICpgs ¼ Cpgs ) ¼ ICpgs
dt dt Cpgs
d d 1
ICpgd ¼ Cpgd ðVA3 VA8 Þ ) ðVA3 VA8 Þ ¼ ICpgd ;
dt dt Cpgd
VA4 VA7
IRgd ¼ ) VA4 VA7 ¼ IRgd Rgd
Rgd
d d 1
ICgd ¼ Cgd ðVA4 VA6 Þ ) ðVA4 VA6 Þ ¼ ICgd ;
dt dt Cgd
VA6 VA7
IRdi ¼ ) VA6 VA7 ¼ IRdi Rdi
Rdi
VA3 VA4 VA4 VA9
IRg ¼ ) VA3 VA4 ¼ IRg Rg ; IRgs ¼ ) VA4 VA9 ¼ IRgs Rgs ;
Rg Rgs
dv dv 1
ICgs ¼ Cgs ) ¼ ICgs
dt dt Cgs
VA5 VA9
IRi ¼ ) VA5 VA9 ¼ IRi Ri ;
Ri
d d 1
ICds ¼ Cds ðVA7 VA9 Þ ) ðVA7 VA9 Þ ¼ ICds
dt dt Cds
VA7 VA9 VA7 VA8
IRds ¼ ) VA7 VA9 ¼ IRds Rds ; IRd ¼ ) VA7 VA8 ¼ IRd Rd
Rds Rd
dVA8 dVA8 1 VA9 VA10
ICpds ¼ Cpds ) ¼ ICpds ; IRs ¼ ) VA9 VA10 ¼ IRs RS
dt dt Cpds RS
dILs dILs 1 dILd dILd 1
VA10 ¼ LS ) ¼ VA10 ; VA8 VA11 ¼ Ld ) ¼ ðVA8 VA11 Þ
dt dt LS dt dt Ld
Vd VA11
IRd1 ¼ ) Vd VA11 ¼ IRd1 Rd1 ) VA11 ¼ Vd IRd1 Rd1
Rd1
d d 1
ICout ¼ Cout ðVA11 Vout Þ ) ðVA11 Vout Þ ¼ ICout ;
dt dt Cout
Vout
IRL ¼ ) Vout ¼ IRL RL
RL
308 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
d 1 dVA3 dVA8 1
ðVA3 VA8 Þ ¼ ICpgd ) ¼ ICpgd
dt Cpgd dt dt Cpgd
dVA8 1 1
) ¼ ICpgs ICpgd
dt Cpgs Cpgd
VA4 VA7 ¼ IRgd Rgd & VA6 VA7 ¼ IRdi Rdi ) VA4 VA6 ¼ IRgd Rgd IRdi Rdi
d 1 d 1
ðVA4 VA6 Þ ¼ ICgd ) ðIRgd Rgd IRdi Rdi Þ ¼ ICgd
dt Cgd dt Cgd
d 1 dIRgd dIRdi 1
ðIRgd Rgd IRdi Rdi Þ ¼ ICgd ) Rgd Rdi ¼ ICgd
dt Cgd dt dt Cgd
VA3 VA4 ¼ IRg Rg & VA4 VA9 ¼ IRgs Rgs ) VA3 VA9 ¼ IRg Rg þ IRgs Rgs
dv 1 d
¼ ICgs ; VA5 VA9 ¼ IRi Ri ; VA7 VA9 ¼ IRds Rds & ðVA7 VA9 Þ
dt Cgs dt
1 dIRds 1
¼ ICds ) ¼ ICds
Cds dt Cds Rds
dVA8 1 dILs 1
VA7 VA8 ¼ IRd Rd ; VA9 VA10 ¼ IRs RS ; ¼ ICpds ; ¼ VA10
dt Cpds dt LS
d 1 dVA3 dVA8 1
ðVA3 VA8 Þ ¼ ICpgd ) ¼
dt Cpgd dt dt Cpgd
dVA8 1 1
ICpgd ) ¼ ICpgs ICpgd
dt Cpgs Cpgd
VA4 VA7 ¼ IRgd Rgd & VA6 VA7 ¼ IRdi Rdi ) VA4 VA6 ¼ IRgd Rgd IRdi Rdi
dILd 1
¼ ðVA8 VA11 Þ & VA11 ¼ Vd IRd1
dt Ld
dILd 1
Rd1 ) ¼ ðVA8 Vd þ IRd1 Rd1 Þ
dt Ld
d 1 d 1
ðVA11 Vout Þ ¼ ICout & Vout ¼ IRL RL ) ðVA11 IRL RL Þ ¼ ICout
dt Cout dt Cout
d 1 d 1
ðVA11 IRL RL Þ ¼ ICout ) ðVd IRd1 Rd1 IRL RL Þ ¼ ICout
dt Cout dt Cout
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 309
d 1
ðVd IRd1 Rd1 IRL RL Þ ¼ ICout ;
dt Cout
dVd dIRd1 dIR 1
ICout ¼ IRL ) Rd1 L RL ¼ IR L
dt dt dt Cout
dVd dIRd1 dIRL 1
¼0) Rd1 þ RL ¼
dt dt dt Cout
IRL ; ILd þ IRd1 ¼ IRL ) IRd1 ¼ IRL ILd
dðIRL ILd Þ dIRL 1
Rd1 þ RL ¼ IRL
dt dt Cout
dIRL dILd dIRL 1
) Rd1 Rd1 þ RL ¼ IR L
dt dt dt Cout
dIRL dILd dIRL 1
Rd1 Rd1 þ RL ¼ IRL
dt dt dt Cout
dIRL dILd 1
) ðRd1 þ RL Þ Rd1 ¼ IR L
dt dt Cout
The condition to find our system fixed points is no variation with time for our
00 00
variables. d Variable
dt ¼ 0.
Table 3.6 Small signal equivalent circuit of FET system differential equations, fixed points and
outcome
System differential equation @ Fixed points Outcome
dt ¼ Cin Rin IRin
dIRin 1
dt ¼ 0
dIRin IRin ¼0
dILg dILg ¼ Vg
dt ¼ Lg ðVg þ VA3 Þ dt ¼ 0
1 VA3
dVA3
dt ¼ C1pgs ICpgs dVA3
dt ¼0 ICpgs ¼0
dVA8
dt ¼ C1pgs ICpgs Cpgd
1
ICpgd dVA8
dt ¼0 ICpgd
¼
Cpgd
ICpgs Cpgs
(continued)
310 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
Rd1 þ
dIRL
RL ¼ C1out IRL
dIRL IRL ¼ 0
dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0
dIRd1 dIRd1
dt dt
dILs 1
dt ¼ 0
dILs
IRd Rd þ VA8 IRds Rds
¼ ðIRd Rd þ VA8 IRds Rds
dt LS
ILs RS ¼ 0
ILs RS Þ
dIRL
¼
1 1
½ ðVA8 Vd
dIRL
¼0
Rd1
Ld ðVA8 Vd þ IRd1 Rd1 Þ ¼ 0
dt
dt ðRd1 þ RL Þ Ld
1
þ IRd1 Rd1 Þ Rd1 IRL
Cout
Method B:
dV
Vg and Vd are constant circuit biasing voltages Vg [ 0; Vd [ 0; dtg ¼ 0; dVdtd ¼ 0
XðtÞVA1
(1) KCL @ circuit node A1: Rin ¼ Cin dtd ðVA1 þ Vg Þ.
(2) KCL @ circuit node A3: ILg ¼ Cpgd dtd ðVA3 VA8 Þ þ VA3RV g
A4
þ Cpgs dVdtA3 .
(3) KCL @ circuit node A4:
VA3 VA4 VA4 VA9 VA4 VA7
Rg ¼ Rgs þ Cgs dv
dt þ Rgd þ C gd d
dt ðV A4 VA6 Þ.
VA5 VA9
(4) KCL @ circuit node A5: Cgs dv
dt ¼ Ri .
(5) KCL @ circuit node A6: Cgd dtd ðVA4 VA6 Þ ¼ VA6RV
di
A7
VA7 VA8
(7) KCL @ circuit node A8: Rd þ Cpgd dtd ðVA3 VA8 Þ ¼ ILd þ Cpds dVdtA8
(8) KCL @ circuit node A9:
VA9 VA10
(9) KCL @ circuit node A10: Rs ¼ ILs .
(10) KCL @ circuit node A11:
Vd VA11 d Vout
ILd þ ¼ Cout ðVA11 Vout Þ ¼
Rd1 dt RL
dILg dILs dILd
Vg VA3 ¼ Lg ; VA10 ¼ LS ; VA8 VA11 ¼ Ld
dt dt dt
ILg ¼ Cpgd dtd ðVA3 VA8 Þ þ VA3RV A4
þ Cpgs dVA3
dt )
ð2Þ
g
C C
We define for simplicity: CT1 ¼ Cpgd
pgs
½Cpds þpgdCpgd þ 1
VA3 VA4 ðVA4 VA9 Þ ðVA5 VA9 Þ ðVA4 VA7 Þ VA6 VA7
¼
Cgd Rg Cgd Rgs Cgd Ri Cgd Rgd Cgd Rdi
(6) = (8) →
VA4 VA7 VA6 VA7 ðVA7 VA8 Þ
þ
Rgd Rdi Rd
VA9 VA10 ðVA4 VA9 Þ ðVA5 VA9 Þ
¼
Rs Rgs Ri
We can summery our last results (circuit node voltages equations) in the below
table:
Table 3.7 Small signal equivalent circuit of FET nodes KCL and circuit nodes voltages equations
Nodes Circuit node voltages equation
KCL
(3) = (5) VA3 VA4
Cgd Rg ðVCA4gdVA9 Þ ðVA5 VA9 Þ ðVA4 VA7 Þ VA6 VA7
Rgs Cgd Ri Cgd Rgd ¼ Cgd Rdi
(*)
(6) = (8) VA4 VA7
Rgd þ VA6 VA7
Rdi ðVA7RV
d
A8 Þ
¼ VA9 V
Rs
A10
ðVA4RV
gs
A9 Þ
ðVA5RV
i
A9 Þ
(**)
314 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
ðVd VA11 Þ RL
Vout ¼ ILd RL þ ) Vout VA11
Rd1
ðVd VA11 Þ RL
¼ ILd RL þ VA11
Rd1
ðVd þ VA11 Þ RL
VA11 Vout ¼ ILd RL þ þ VA11 ;
Rd1
d dVA11 dVd
ðVA11 Vd Þ ¼ ; ¼0
dt dt dt
dVA11 dVout dILd RL d dVA11
¼ RL þ ðVA11 Vd Þ þ
dt dt dt Rd1 dt dt
dVA11 1 Vd RL
¼ ILd þ þ VA8
dt Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Rd1 ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ RL VA11
Ld Cout Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1
dVA11 1 Vd RL
¼ ILd þ þ RL VA8
dt Cout ½Rd1 þ 1
R L
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Rd1 ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL
RL 1 1
½ þ VA11
Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
We need to find our system fixed points. First we analyze our circuit node
voltages equations.
VA3 VA4 ðVA4 VA9 Þ ðVA5 VA9 Þ ðVA4 VA7 Þ VA6 VA7
ð Þ ¼
Cgd Rg Cgd Rgs Cgd Ri Cgd Rgd Cgd Rdi
VA3 VA4 VA4 VA9 VA5 VA9 VA4
þ þ
Cgd Rg Cgd Rg Cgd Rgs Cgd Rgs Cgd Ri Cgd Ri Cgd Rgd
VA7 VA6 VA7
þ ¼
Cgd Rgd Cgd Rdi Cgd Rdi
316 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
1 1 1 1
C11 ¼ ; C12 ¼ f þ þ g; C13
Cgd Rg Cgd Rg Cgd Rgs Cgd Rgd
1 1
¼ ; C14 ¼
Cgd Ri Cgd Rdi
1 1 1 1
C15 ¼ þ ; C16 ¼ 0; C17 ¼ þ ; C18
Cgd Rdi Cgd Rgd Cgd Rgs Cgd Ri
X
8
¼ 0; C1k VAk þ 2 ¼ 0
k¼1
VA4 VA7 VA6 VA7 VA7 VA8 VA9 VA10 VA4 VA9 VA5 VA9
þ þ ¼ þ þ
Rgd Rgd Rdi Rdi Rd Rd Rs Rs Rgs Rgs Ri Ri
1 1 VA5 VA6 1 1 1
VA3 0 þ VA4 ð þ Þþ þ VA7 f þ þ g
Rgd Rgs Ri Rdi Rgd Rdi Rd
VA8 1 1 1 VA10
þ VA9 f þ þ gþ ¼0
Rd Rs Rgs Ri Rs
3.2 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 317
1 1 1 1
C21 ¼ 0; C22 ¼ þ ; C23 ¼ ; C24 ¼ ;
Rgd Rgs Ri Rdi
1 1 1 1
C25 ¼ f þ þ g; C26 ¼
Rgd Rdi Rd Rd
1 1 1 1 X 8
C27 ¼ f þ þ g; C28 ¼ ; C2k VAk þ 2 ¼ 0
Rs Rgs Ri Rs k¼1
ðÞðÞ
X
8 X
8 X
8
C1k VAk þ 2 C2k VAk þ 2 ¼ 0; C1k VAk þ 2
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
X
8 X
8
C2k VAk þ 2 ¼ ðC1k C2k Þ VAk þ 2
k¼1 k¼1
VA3 C11 þ VA4 ðC12 C22 Þ þ VA5 ðC13 C23 Þ þ VA6 ðC14 C24 Þ þ VA7 ðC15 C25 Þ
VA8 C26 þ VA9 ðC17 C27 Þ VA10 C28 ¼ 0
At fixed points:
dVA3 d dv d
¼ 0 ; ðVA4 VA6 Þ ¼ 0 ; ¼ 0 ; ðVA7 VA9 Þ ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt
d dILg dILd dVA11
ðVA9 VA10 Þ ¼ 0 ; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼0
dt dt dt dt
1 Vd RL
I þ þ
Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Rd1 ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
VA8 ½ þ RL V ¼ 0
Ld Cout Rd1 ½R þ 1 A11
d1
1 Vd RL
ILd þ þ VA8 f RL
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1
RL
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Rd1
RL
½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ g
Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
¼0
X
8
VA6 ¼ VA7 ; VA5 ¼ VA9 ; VA10 ¼ 0; VA3 ¼ Vg ; VA8 ¼ VA11 ; C1k VAk þ 2
k¼1
X
8
¼ 0; C2k VAk þ 2 ¼ 0
k¼1
dVA11 1 Vd RL
¼ ILd þ þ VA8
dt Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Rd1 ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ RL VA11
Ld Cout Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1
dILg
Inserting expressions: dILd
dt ¼ ; dt ¼
320 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
d 2 VA3 1 dVA7 1
þ
dt2 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 dt Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
dVA8 1 1
þ VA8
dt ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
VA11 þ
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1 1 dVA3
Vg þ VA3 þ
Cpgd CT1 Lg Cpgd Rg CT1 dt
1 dVA4
¼0
Cpgd Rg CT1 dt
d 2 VA3
We define the following new variables: dVA3
dt ¼ Y1 ; dt2 ¼ dYdt1 ; dVA4
dt ¼ Y2
dVA7 dVA8
¼ Y3 ; ¼ Y4
dt dt
dY1 1 1
Y3 þ
dt Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1 1
Y4 þ VA8
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1 1
VA11 þ Vg þ
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld Cpgd CT1 Lg Cpgd CT1
1 1 1
VA3 þ Y1 Y2 ¼ 0
Lg Cpgd Rg CT1 Cpgd Rg CT1
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 321
dY1 1 1
¼ Y3
dt Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1 1
Y4 VA8
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
þ VA11 Vg
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1 1
VA3 Y1
Cpgd CT1 Lg Cpgd Rg CT1
1
þ Y2
Cpgd Rg CT1
dVA11 1 Vd RL
¼ ILd þ þ
dt Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Rd1 ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
VA8 ½ þ VA11
Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
d 2 VA11 1 dILd RL
¼ þ RL
dt2 Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 dt ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
dVA8 RL 1 1 dVA11
½ þ
dt Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1 dt
d1
d 2 VA11 1 1 RL
¼ ðVA8 VA11 Þ þ RL
dt2 Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
dVA8 RL 1 1 dVA11
½ þ RL
dt Ld Cout Rd1 ½R þ 1 dt
d1
d 2 VA11
We define the following new variables: dVA8
dt ¼ Y4 ; dVA11
dt ¼ Y5 ; dt2 ¼ dYdt5
dY5 1 1 RL RL 1
¼ ðVA8 VA11 Þ þ RL Y4 ½ þ
dt Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
½Rd1 þ 1 Ld Ld Cout Rd1
1
RL Y5
½Rd1 þ 1
dY5 1 1 1 1 RL
¼ VA8 VA11 þ RL Y4
dt Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ Y5
Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
322 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
d2 1 dVA4 1 1 dVA7
ðVA7 VA9 Þ ¼
dt 2 Cds Rgd dt Cds Rgd dt dt
1 dVA6 1 dVA7
þ
Cds Rdi dt Cds Rdi dt
1 dVA7 1 dVA8 1 dVA7
þ
Cds Rd dt Cds Rd dt Cds Rds dt
1 dVA9 gm dv
þ
Cds Rds dt Cds dt
dVA9 dVA9
Y7 ¼ Y3 ) ¼ Y7 þ Y 3
dt dt
dY7 1 1 1
¼ Y7 þ Y2 þ Y 6 Y3
dt Cds Rds Cds Rgd Cds Rdi
1 1 1
½ þ þ
Cds Rgd Cds Rdi Cds Rd
1 gm 1 VA5 gm 1 VA9
þ Y4 þ
Cds Rd Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 323
dY1 1
¼ f2 ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; VA3 ; VA8 ; VA11 Þ ¼
dt Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1
Y3 Y4
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1 1 1 1
VA8 þ VA11
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
Vg VA3
Cpgd CT1 Lg Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1
Y1 þ Y2
Cpgd Rg CT1 Cpgd Rg CT1
dY5 1 1 1 1 RL
¼ VA8 VA11 þ RL Y4
dt Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ Y5
Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
dY7 1 1 1
¼ f10 ðVA5 ; VA9 ; Y2 ; Y6 ; Y7 ; Y3 ; Y4 Þ ¼ Y7 þ Y2 þ Y6
dt Cds Rds Cds Rgd Cds Rdi
1 1 1 1
Y3 ½ þ þ þ
Cds Rgd Cds Rdi Cds Rd Cds Rd
gm 1 VA5 gm 1 VA9
Y4 þ
Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri
@ Fixed points:
dVA3 dY1 dVA4 dVA7 dVA8
¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼0
dt dt dt dt dt
dVA11 dY5 dVA6 dVA9 dY7
¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼ 0; ¼0
dt dt dt dt dt
Y1 ¼ 0 ; Y2 ¼ 0 ; Y3 ¼ 0 ; Y4 ¼ 0 ; Y5 ¼ 0 ; Y6 ¼ 0 ; Y7 ¼ 0
1 1 1 1
V þ
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld A8 ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
VA11 Vg V ¼ 0
Cpgd CT1 Lg Cpgd CT1 Lg A3
1 1 1 1
VA8 VA11 ¼0
Cout ½R þ 1 Ld
RL
d1
Cout ½R þ 1 Ld
R L
d1
gm 1 VA5 gm 1 VA9
þ ¼0
Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of our system consists in adding to coordinates
½VA3 ; VA4 ; VA7 ; VA8 ; Y1 ; VA11 ; Y5 ; VA6 ; VA9 ; . . . arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential form ½vA3 ; vA4 ; vA7 ; vA8 ; y1 ; vA11 ; y5 ; vA6 ; vA9 ; . . . ekt , and retaining the first
order terms in VA3 ; VA4 ; VA7 ; VA8 ; Y1 ; VA11 ; Y5 ; VA6 ; VA9 ; . . .. The system of homo-
geneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristics equation in the eigenvalues
λ . Our system fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½vA3 ; vA4 ; vA7 ; vA8 ; y1 ; vA11 ; y5 ; vA6 ; vA9 ; . . . ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1
ðjÞ
(second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc. VA3 ðtÞ ¼ VA3 þ vA3 ekt ;
ðjÞ
VA4 ðtÞ ¼ VA4 þ vA4 ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
VA7 ðtÞ ¼ VA7 þ vA7 ekt ; VA8 ðtÞ ¼ VA8 þ vA8 ekt ;
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt ; VA11 ðtÞ ¼ VA11 þ vA11 ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y5 ðtÞ ¼ Y5 þ y5 ekt ; VA6 ðtÞ ¼ VA6 þ vA6 ekt ; VA9 ðtÞ ¼ VA9 þ vA9 ekt . . .:
We choose the above expressions for our VA3 ðtÞ; VA4 ðtÞ; VA7 ðtÞ; VA8 ðtÞ;
Y1 ðtÞ; VA11 ðtÞ; Y5 ðtÞ; VA6 ðtÞ; VA9 ðtÞ; . . . as small displacement ½vA3 ; vA4 ; vA7 ; vA8 ; y1 ;
vA11 ; y5 ; vA6 ; vA9 ; . . .
ðjÞ
from our system fixed points at time t = 0. VA3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA3 þ vA3 ;
ðjÞ
VA4 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA4 þ vA4
ðjÞ ðjÞ
VA7 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA7 þ vA7 ; VA8 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA8 þ vA8 ;
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ; VA11 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA11 þ vA11
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y5 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y5 þ y5 ; VA6 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA6 þ vA6 ; VA9 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VA9 þ vA9 . . .. . .
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 325
For λ < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise λ > 0, t > 0 is
unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for λ < 0, t > 0
otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. λ is the eigenvalue
parameter which is established if the fixed point is stable or unstable; additionally,
his absolute value |λ| establishes the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point (Yuri 1995; Jack and Huseyin 1991) [2–4]. The speeds of flow toward or
away from the selected fixed point for system variables derivatives with respect to
time are:
dY1 1 1
¼ Y3 Y4
dt Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1 1 1 1
VA8 þ
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
VA11 Vg VA3
Cpgd CT1 Lg Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1
Y1 þ Y2
Cpgd Rg CT1 Cpgd Rg CT1
326 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
1 ðjÞ
y1 k ekt ¼ ½Y3 þ y3 ekt
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1 ðjÞ
½Y4 þ y4 ekt
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1 1 ðjÞ
½VA8 þ vA8 ekt
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1
þ ½VA11 þ vA11 ekt Vg
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½VA3 þ vA3 ekt ½Y1 þ y1 ekt
Cpgd CT1 Lg Cpgd Rg CT1
1 ðjÞ
þ ½Y2 þ y2 ekt
Cpgd Rg CT1
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
y1 k ekt ¼ f Y Y
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 3 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ 1 1
V þ V Vg
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld A8 ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld A11 Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
V Y þ Y g
Cpgd CT1 Lg A3 Cpgd Rg CT1 1 Cpgd Rg CT1 2
1 1
y3 ekt y4 ekt
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1 1
vA8 ekt
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
vA11 ekt vA3 ekt
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1
y1 ekt þ y2 ekt
Cpgd Rg CT1 Cpgd Rg CT1
@ fixed point
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
f Y Y
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 3 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ 1 1
VA8 þ VA11 Vg
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
V Y þ Y g¼0
Cpgd CT1 Lg A3 Cpgd Rg CT1 1 Cpgd Rg CT1 2
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 327
1 1
y1 k ekt ¼ y3 ekt
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1 1
y4 ekt vA8 ekt
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
þ vA11 ekt vA3 ekt
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1
y1 ekt þ y2 ekt
Cpgd Rg CT1 Cpgd Rg CT1
1 1
y1 k ¼ y3
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1 1
y4 vA8
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
þ vA11
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1
vA3 y1 þ y2
Cpgd Rg CT1 Cpgd Rg CT1
1 1
y3
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1 1
y4 vA8
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
þ vA11
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1
vA3 y1 þ y2 y 1 k ¼ 0
Cpgd Rg CT1 Cpgd Rg CT1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
dVA11
dt ¼ Y5 ) vA11 k ekt ¼ Y5 þ y5 ekt ; @ fixed point Y5 ¼ 0 ) vA11 k ekt ¼
y5 ekt
dVA6
vA11 k ekt ¼ y5 ekt ) y5 vA11 k ¼ 0; ¼ Y6 ) vA6 k ekt
dt
ðjÞ
¼ Y6 þ y6 ekt
ðjÞ
@ fixed point Y6 ¼ 0 ) vA6 k ekt ¼ y6 ekt ) y6 vA6 k ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
dt ¼ Y7 þ Y3
dVA9
) vA9 k ekt ¼ Y7 þ y7 ekt þ Y3 þ y3 ekt @ fixed point
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y7 þ Y3 ¼ 0
dY5 1 1 1 1 RL
¼ VA8 VA11 þ RL Y4
dt Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ RL Y5
Ld Cout Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1
y5 k ekt
RL ðjÞ RL 1 1 ðjÞ
þ ½Y4 þ y4 ekt ½ þ RL ½Y5 þ y5 ekt
½RRd1L þ 1 Ld Ld Cout Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ
y5 k ekt ¼ f V V
Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld A8 Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld A11
RL ðjÞ RL 1 1 ðjÞ
þ Y ½ þ Y g
½RRd1L þ 1 Ld 4 Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1 5
d1
1 1 1 1
þ vA8 ekt
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
RL
vA11 ekt þ RL y4 ekt
½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ y5 ekt
Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ
f VA8 VA11
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
R L
@ fixed point
RL ðjÞ RL 1 1 ðjÞ
þ Y ½ þ Y g¼0
½RRd1L þ 1 Ld 4 Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1 5
d1
1 1 1 1 RL
y5 k ¼ vA8 vA11 þ RL y4
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 d
RL L Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 d
RL L ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ RL y5
Ld Cout Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1
1 1 1 1 RL
vA8 vA11 þ RL y4
Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ y5 y5 k ¼ 0
Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 329
dY7 1 1 1
¼ Y7 þ Y2 þ Y6
dt Cds Rds Cds Rgd Cds Rdi
1 1 1 1
Y3 ½ þ þ þ
Cds Rgd Cds Rdi Cds Rd Cds Rd
gm 1 VA5 gm 1 VA9
Y4 þ
Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
y7 k ekt ¼ ½Y7 þ y7 ekt þ ½Y2 þ y2 ekt
Cds Rds Cds Rgd
1 ðjÞ
þ ½Y6 þ y6 ekt
Cds Rdi
ðjÞ 1 1 1
½Y3 þ y3 ekt ½ þ þ
Cds Rgd Cds Rdi Cds Rd
1 ðjÞ
þ ½Y4 þ y4 ekt
Cds Rd
ðjÞ ðjÞ
gm 1 ½VA5 þ vA5 ekt gm 1 ½VA9 þ vA9 ekt
þ
Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri
@ fixed point
330 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
1 1 1 1 1 1
y7 þ y2 þ y6 ½ þ þ y3
Cds Rds Cds Rgd Cds Rdi Cds Rgd Cds Rdi Cds Rd
1 gm 1 gm 1
þ y4 vA5 þ vA9 y7 k ¼ 0
Cds Rd Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri
1 1 1 1
y3 y4 vA8
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1 1 1 1
þ vA11 vA3
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1
y1 þ y2 y1 k ¼ 0
Cpgd Rg CT1 Cpgd Rg CT1
1 1 1 1 RL
vA8 vA11 þ RL y4
Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld Cout ½RRd1L þ 1 Ld ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL 1 1
½ þ RL y5 y5 k ¼ 0
Ld Cout Rd1 ½R þ 1
d1
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 331
1 1 1 1 1 1
y7 þ y2 þ y6 ½ þ þ y3
Cds Rds Cds Rgd Cds Rdi Cds Rgd Cds Rdi Cds Rd
1 gm 1 gm 1
þ y4 vA5 þ vA9 y7 k ¼ 0
Cds Rd Cds Cgs Ri Cds Cgs Ri
0 1
vA 3
B vA 4 C
B C
B vA 7 C 0 1
0 1 Bv C
B
C 0 1 y2
i1 1 ... i1 10 B A8 C v11 . . . v15 B y3 C
B .. .. .. C B y1 C
B
CþB .. .. .. C B
C
B y4 C ¼ 0; i1
@ . . . A B vA11 C @ . . . A B C 1
B C @ y6 A
i10 1 i10 10 B vA C v10 1 v10 5
B 6 C vA 5
B vA C
B 9 C
@ y5 A
y7
¼ k; i1 2 ¼ i1 3 ¼ i1 4 ¼ 0
i1 6 ¼ ¼ i1 ¼ 0 ; i2 1 ¼ 0 ; i2 2 ¼ k ;
10
i2 3 ¼ . . . ¼ i2 10 ; i3 1 ¼ i3 2 ¼ 0 ; i3 3 ¼ k
i3 4 ¼ . . . ¼ i3 10 ¼ 0 ; i4 1 ¼ i4 2 ¼ i4 3 ¼ 0 ; i4 4 ¼ k ;
1 1
i4 5 ¼ . . . ¼ i4 10 ¼ 0 ; i5 1 ¼
Cpgd CT1 Lg
1 1
i5 2 ¼ 0 ; i5 3 ¼ 0 ; i5 4 ¼ ;
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
1
i5 5 ¼ k
Cpgd Rg CT1
1 1
i5 6 ¼ ; i5 7 ¼ i5 8 ¼ i5 9 ¼ i5 10 ¼ 0
½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1 Ld
i6 1 ¼ . . . ¼ i6 5 ¼ 0 ; i6 6 ¼ k
i6 7 ¼ 0 ; i6 8 ¼ 0 ; i6 9 ¼ 1 ; i6 10 ¼ 0 ; i7 1 ¼ . . . ¼ i7 6 ¼ 0;
i7 7 ¼ k ; i7 8 ¼ i7 9 ¼ i7 10 ¼ 0
i8 1 ¼ . . . ¼ i8 7 ¼ 0 ; i8 8 ¼ k ; i8 9 ¼ 0 ; i8 10 ¼ 1 ;
1 1
i9 1 ¼ i9 2 ¼ i9 3 ¼ 0 i9 4 ¼
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL
1 1
i9 5 ¼ 0 ; i9 6 ¼ ; i9 7 ¼ i9 8 ¼0
Cout ½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
RL
RL 1 1
i9 9 ¼ k ½ þ
Ld Cout Rd1 ½RRL þ 1
d1
332 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
i9 10 ¼ 0 ; i10 1 ¼ i10
¼ i10 3 ¼ i10 4 ¼ i10 5 ¼ i10 6
2
gm 1
¼ i10 7 ¼ 0; i10 8 ¼
Cds Cgs Ri
1
i10 9 ¼ 0 ; i10 10 ¼ k þ ; v11 ¼ . . . ¼ v15 ¼ 0 ;
Cds Rds
v21 ¼ 1 ; v22 ¼ . . . ¼ v25 ¼ 0
v31 ¼ 0 ; v32 ¼ 1 ; v33 ¼ v34 ¼ v35 ¼ 0 ;
v41 ¼ v42 ¼ 0 ; v43 ¼ 1 ; v44 ¼ 0 ; v45 ¼ 0
1 1
v51 ¼ ; v52 ¼ ;
Cpgd Rg CT1 Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
1
v53 ¼
Rd ½Cpds þ Cpgd CT1
v54 ¼ v55 ¼ 0 ; v61 ¼ . . . ¼ v65 ¼ 0 ; v71 ¼ v72 ¼ v73 ¼ 0;
v74 ¼ 1 ; v75 ¼ 0 ; v81 ¼ 0 ; v82 ¼ 1
v83 ¼ v84 ¼ v85 ¼ 0 ; v91 ¼ v92 ¼ 0;
RL
v93 ¼ RL ; v94 ¼ v95 ¼ 0
½Rd1 þ 1 Ld
1 1 1 1
v10 1 ¼ ; v10 2 ¼ ½ þ þ
Cds Rgd Cds Rgd Cds Rdi Cds Rd
1 1 gm 1
v10 3 ¼ v10 4 ¼ ; v10 5 ¼
Cds Rd Cds Rdi Cds Cgs Ri
Assumption:
0 1 0 1
v11 . . . v15 i1 1 . . . i1 10
B .. .. .. C B .. .. .. C
@ . . . A ! e; detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 ; A k I ¼ @ . . . A
v10 1 v10 5 i10 1 i10 10
0 1
vA3
B C
B vA4 C
B C
B vA C
B 7C
B C
0 1 B vA8 C 0 1
i1 ... i1 10 B C i1 ... i1
1 B y C 1 10
B .. .. .. C B 1 C 0 ; detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 ) detB .. .. .. C
@ . . . A B C @ . . . A 0
B vA11 C
i10 i10 10 B C i10 i10
1 B v C 1 10
B A6 C
B C
B vA9 C
B C
B y C
@ 5A
y7
3.3 Field Effect Transistor (FETs) at Microwave … 333
A wide variety of solid state diodes and transistor have been developed for
microwave use. IMPact ionization Avalanche Transit-Time (IMPATT) diode
functions as microwave oscillator. It used to produce carrier signal for microwave
transmission system. IMPATT can operate from a few GHz to a few hundred GHz.
The diode is operated in reverse bias near breakdown, and both the N and N-
regions are completely depleted. Because of the difference in doping between the
“drift region” and “avalanche region”, the electric field is highly peaked in the
avalanche region and nearly flat in drift region. In operation, avalanche breakdown
occurs at the point of highest electric field, and this generates a large number of
hole-electron pairs by impact ionization. The holes are swept into the cathode, but
the electrons travel across the drift region toward anode. As they drift, they induce
image charges on the anode, giving rise to a displacement current in the external
circuit that is 180° out of phase with the nearly sinusoidal voltage waveform. It’s
buildup of microwave oscillations in the diode current and voltage when the diode
is embedded in a resonant cavity and biased at breakdown. The IMPATT diode has
a negative resistance from DC through microwave frequencies. Consequently, it is
prone to oscillate at low frequencies, with the lead inductance from bias circuit
connections. The voltage due to bias circuit oscillations may be large enough to
burn the device out if adequate precautions are not observed. It is prudent practice
to suppress the bias circuit oscillation. Adequate heat sink must be provided for the
diode to operate properly. These IMPATT diodes have been designed to operate in
the pre-collection mode. As the diode is tuned up from a low operating current from
a constant current source, it will be noticed that at the onset of pre-collection mode,
the diode voltage falls down. The power output will increase by several dBs with a
slight shift in the operating frequency. When the circuit is detuned in such a fashion
that the diode falls out of the pre-collection mode, the diode voltage will increase.
The power dissipation will increase as the power output falls down. If the diode is
not adequately heat sink, the diode may burn out. A main advantage is their high
power capability. These diodes are used in a variety of applications from low power
radar systems to alarms. IMPATT oscillator is for higher-power output, higher
efficiency, and higher frequency range of operation. The effect of negative
334 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
three port
circulator
Delay line (Tau1) Delay line (Tau3)
ARB1 ARB2
1 3
N1 OUT N1 OUT
2
A RB3 R2
N1
V2 Delay line (Tau2)
Microwave RF Rload
source X(t)
OUT
C1
L1
D1
IMPATT
R1 diode
V1
dVCd 1
I ¼ ICd þ IRd ¼ IRb ; ICd ¼ Cd ; VCd ¼
dt Cd
Z
ICd dt ; Vb ¼ I Rb þ VCd þ VRd
Z Z
1 d 1
Vb ¼ I Rb þ ICd dt þ VRd ; fVb ¼ I Rb þ ICd dt þ VRd g
Cd dt Cd
dI 1 dVRd dI 1
0 ¼ Rb þ I Cd þ ) Rb þ
dt Cd dt dt Cd
dI dVRd dVRd
I Cd þ ¼ 0; ¼ Rd ¼ Rc
dt dI dI
dI 1 dI dI dI 1
Rb þ IC d R c ¼ 0 ) R c R b ¼ IC d ; R c R b [ 0
dt Cd dt dt dt Cd
dI 1 dI=dt 1 d 1
ðRc Rb Þ ¼ I ) ¼ ) fln IðtÞg ¼
dt Cd I Cd ðRc Rb Þ dt Cd ðRc Rb Þ
Z
d 1 1 1
t
f fln IðtÞg ¼ g ) ln IðtÞ ¼ t ) IðtÞ ¼ eCd ðRc Rb Þ
dt Cd ðRc Rb Þ Cd ðRc Rb Þ
1
is the exponential coefficient.
Cd ðRc Rb Þ
We use active circulator in our circuit. Active circulators are ideally suited for
realization using monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) technology. The
circuit employs decade bandwidth active circulator which shows very low phase
error characteristic. The circuit configuration of the active circulator used three
metal–semiconductor field effect transistors (MESFETs) which are the GEC-Marconi
standard library cell F20-FET-4 × 75. With all the standard library cells, it is a very
accurate ultra-wideband small signal model for the device. It is similar to a junction
gate field-effect transistor (JFET) in construction and terminology. The difference is
that instead of using a p-n junction for gate, a schottky (metal semiconductor)
junction is used. A typical three ports decade bandwidth active circulator has three
MESFETs transistors interconnected with each other. RF, CF, LF, CC, Rsb play a
major role in the working of the circuit. The three feedback branches (RF, CF, LF)
are used to link all the three transistors in an end to end fashion. The source resistor
(Rsb) is shared among all the three MESFETs transistors and one transistor is source
coupled with the other two transistors using this source resistor. The circuit works in
a symmetric fashion. We consider MESFET high frequency model taking node
capacitors into account. Next figure describes the circuit configuration of the active
circulator [36, 37]. We use N-type MESFET but usually the recommended is a
symmetrical bilateral MESFET. All Cc and Cf capacitors are un-polarized. Once we
inject RF signal to port P1, it passes to port P2 through feedback branch (RF, CF, LF).
The same is between ports P2 and P3, ports P3 and P1. In case we inject RF signal to
port P2, it reaches Q1 gate and shorten Q1’s drain and source. Then Port 2’s RF
signal is shortened to ground through resistor Rsb and did not reach port P1. The
same is between P1 to P3 and P3 to P2. We consider a varactor which is realized by
connecting together the drain and source terminations of a standard MESFET,
resulting in a Schottky junction. The bias potential is then applied across the
drain/source and gate terminations. Our three ports decade bandwidth active circu-
lator with micro strip delay lines and IMPATT diode circuit in port P2 gets his input
RF signal from microwave RF source (port P1) and feeds antenna unit by active
circulator output RF signal (Port P3) [36, 37].
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 339
Active circulator system can be described by system path from RFin port (P1) to
RFout port (P3). For simplicity we ignore MESFET high frequency equivalent
model and took it as cutoff element in our system. Next figure describes our
IMPATT amplifier system path from microwave RF source X(t) to antenna unit
(Rload). We ignore the signal path from P3 to P1 since our amplifier RF signal is feed
directly to load antenna. Rload is a pure resistive but can be taken with additional
reactance part. We consider fully matching between antenna load resistance and
three power active circulator IMPATT diode circuit, no signal reflections. ARB1,
ARB2, and ARB3 are circuit micro strip delay line, VARB1 ðtÞ ! e ;
VARB2 ðtÞ ! e ; VARB3 ðtÞ ! e. Due to active circulator’s micro strip transmission
lines delays, s1 for the first port current, s2 for the second port current, and s3 for the
third port current. V1 is IMPATT diode bias voltage.
dVRD dVRD
I1 ðtÞ ! I1 ðt s1 Þ ; I2 ðtÞ ! I2 ðt s2 Þ ; I3 ðtÞ ! I3 ðt s3 Þ ; \0 ;
dIRD dIRD
dVRD
¼ RD ; j j ¼ Rc
dIRD
340 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
First branch:
Second branch:
dVC1 dVCd
VP2 VA ¼ VC1 ; C1 þ IL 1 ¼ C d
dt dt
Z
dVC1 1 dVCd d 2 VC1
C1 þ VL1 dt ¼ Cd ) C1
dt L1 dt dt2
2
1 d VCd
þ VL1 ¼ Cd ; VR1 ¼ IL1 R1
L1 dt2
dVRd dVCd ICd IRd
V1 VCd VRd ¼ VR1 þ VL1 ; ¼Rd ; ¼ ¼
dIRd dt Cd Cd
dVC1 dVP2 dVCd
VC1 ¼ VP2 VA ¼ VP2 VCd VRd ) ¼
dt dt dt
dVRd dVC1 dVP2 IRd dVRd
; ¼
dt dt dt Cd dt
dVC1 dVP2 IRd dVRd
I2 ¼ C1 ¼ C1 ð Þ
dt dt Cd dt
dVP2 IRd dIRd dVRd dVRd
¼ C1 ð Þ; ¼ Rc
dt Cd dt dIRd dIRd
dVP2 IRd dIRd
I2 ¼ C1 ð þ Rc Þ ; I2 þ IL1 ¼ ICd ¼ IRd ) I2
dt Cd dt
dVP2 I2 þ IL1 dðI2 þ IL1 Þ
¼ C1 ð þ Rc Þ
dt Cd dt
Third branch:
dVCf dI3
I3 ¼ Cf ; VLf ¼ Lf ; VRf ¼ I3 Rf ;
dt dt
dVCC dVCf I3
I3 ¼ CC ; IRload ¼ I3 ðt s3 Þ ; ¼
dt dt Cf
dVCC I3 dVCC dVCf I3 I3 d 1 1
¼ ; þ ¼ þ ) ðVCC þ VCf Þ ¼ I3 ð þ Þ
dt CC dt dt Cf CC dt Cf CC
VP2 VP3 ¼ VCf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC ; VP3 ¼ VRload ¼ Rload IRload ¼ Rload I3 ðt s3 Þ
dI3
VP2 VP3 VLf VRf ¼ VCf þ VCC ; VCf þ VCC ¼ VP2 VP3 Lf I3 Rf
dt
2
d dVP2 dVP3 d I3 dI3
ðVCf þ VCC Þ ¼ Lf 2 Rf ;
dt dt dt dt dt
1 1 dVP2 dVP3 d 2 I3 dI3
I3 ð þ Þ¼ Lf 2 Rf
Cf CC dt dt dt dt
342 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
dVP3 dI3 ðt s3 Þ
¼ Rload
VP3 ¼ Rload I3 ðt s3 Þ )
dt dt
1 1 dVP1 I2 ðI2 þ IL1 Þ dðI2 þ IL1 Þ
I1 ð þ Þ¼ ½ þ Rc
Cf CC dt C1 Cd dt
dI1 d 2 I1
Rf Lf 2
dt dt
1 1 I2 ðI2 þ IL1 Þ dðI2 þ IL1 Þ
I3 ð þ Þ¼ þ Rc Rload
Cf CC C1 Cd dt
dI3 ðt s3 Þ d 2 I3 dI3
Lf 2 Rf
dt dt dt
dðI1 I3 þ IL1 Þ d 2 I1 dI 0 d 2 I3 dI 0
¼ I10 I30 þ IL0 1 ; 2 ¼ 1 ; 2 ¼ 3
dt dt dt dt dt
1 1 dVP1 I1 I3 ðI1 I3 þ IL1 Þ
I1 ð þ Þ¼ ½ þ
Cf CC dt C1 Cd
0
dI
ðI10 I30 þ IL0 1 Þ Rc I10 Rf Lf 1
dt
dI10 dVP1 I1 I3 ðI1 I3 þ IL1 Þ
Lf ¼ ½ þ
dt dt C1 Cd
1 1
ðI10 I30 þ IL0 1 Þ Rc I10 Rf I1 ð þ Þ
Cf CC
dI 0 dVP1 I1 I3 I1 I3 IL
Lf 1 ¼ ½ þ þ 1
dt dt C1 C1 Cd Cd Cd
I10 Rc þ I30 Rc IL0 1 Rc
1 1
I10 Rf I1 ð þ Þ
Cf CC
dI10 1 dVP1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I L1
¼ I1 ½ þ þ þ þ I3 ½ þ
dt Lf dt C1 Cd Cf C C Lf C1 Cd Lf Cd Lf
1 Rc Rc
þ I10 ½Rc Rf I30 þ IL0 1
Lf Lf Lf
1 1 I1 I3 ðI1 I3 þ IL1 Þ
I3 ð þ Þ¼ þ ½I10 I30 þ IL0 1
Cf CC C1 Cd
dI3 ðt s3 Þ dI 0
Rc Rload Lf 3 I30 Rf
dt dt
1 1 I1 I3 I1 I3 IL
I3 ð þ Þ¼ þ þ 1 I10 Rc þ I30 Rc IL0 1
Cf CC C1 C1 Cd Cd Cd
dI3 ðt s3 Þ dI 0
Rc Rload Lf 3 I30 Rf
dt dt
dI30 1 1 1 1 1 1
Lf ¼ I1 ½ þ I3 ½ þ þð þ Þ
dt C1 Cd C1 Cd Cf CC
IL dI3 ðt s3 Þ
þ 1 I10 Rc þ I30 ½Rc Rf IL0 1 Rc Rload
Cd dt
0
dI3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ I1 ½ þ I3 ½ þ þ þ
dt C1 Cd Lf C1 Cd Cf CC
1 IL1 Rc ½Rc Rf
þ I10 þ I30
Lf Cd Lf Lf Lf
Rc Rload dI3 ðt s3 Þ
IL0 1
Lf Lf dt
344 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
dIL1
Finally we get system set of differential equations: I10 ¼ dIdt1 ; I30 ¼ dIdt3 ; IL0 1 ¼ dt
dI10 1 dVP1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I L1
¼ I1 ½ þ þ þ þ I3 ½ þ
dt Lf dt C1 Cd Cf CC Lf C1 Cd Lf Cd Lf
1 Rc Rc
þ I10 ½Rc Rf I30 þ IL0 1
Lf Lf Lf
0
dI3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ I1 ½ þ I3 ½ þ þ þ
dt C1 Cd Lf C1 Cd Cf CC
1 I L1 Rc ½Rc Rf
þ I10 þ I30
Lf Cd Lf Lf Lf
Rc Rload dI3 ðt s3 Þ
IL0 1
Lf Lf dt
dI 0 dI 0
We add the above two differential equations: f dt1 ¼ . . .g þ f dt3 ¼ . . .g
dI10 dI 0 1 dVP1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rf
þ 3¼ I1 ½ þ I3 ½ þ I10
dt dt Lf dt Cf CC Lf Cf CC Lf Lf
R R dI ðt s Þ
I30
f load 3 3
Lf Lf dt
dI10 dI 0 1 dVP1 1 1 1 Rf Rload dI3 ðt s3 Þ
þ 3¼ ½ þ ðI1 þ I3 Þ ðI10 þ I30 Þ
dt dt Lf dt Cf CC Lf Lf Lf dt
dnðtÞ X0 dnðtÞ
E ð0Þ ðX ð0Þ ; Y ð0Þ Þ ¼ ð0; 0Þ 8 ¼ 0 ; E ð1Þ ðX ð1Þ ; Y ð1Þ Þ ¼ ð 1 ; 0Þ 8 [0
dt ½Cf þ C1C L1f dt
X0 dnðtÞ
E ð2Þ ðX ð2Þ ; Y ð2Þ Þ ¼ ð ; 0Þ 8 \0:
½C1f þ C1C L1f dt
1 Rc 1
N11 ¼ ½Rc Rf ; N12 ¼ ; N13 ¼ CP 1 ;
Lf Lf Lf
1 1
N14 ¼ CP 2 ; N15 ¼
Lf Cd Lf
Rc ½Rc Rf 1
N21 ¼ ; N22 ¼ ; N23 ¼ CP 2 ;
Lf Lf Lf
1 1
N24 ¼ CP 1 ; N25 ¼
Lf Cd Lf
N31 ¼ 1 ; N32 ¼ 0 ; N33 ¼ 0 ; N34 ¼ 0 ; N35 ¼ 0 ; N41 ¼ 0;
N42 ¼ 1 ; N43 ¼ 0 ; N44 ¼ 0
N45 ¼ 0 ; N51 ¼ N55 ¼ 0:
The standard local stability analysis about anyone of the equilibrium points of
active circulator IMPATT amplifier system consist in adding to coordinates
½I10 ; I30 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1 arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1
ekt and retaining the first order terms in I10 ; I30 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1 . The system of five ho-
mogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristics equation in the eigen-
values-λ. The polynomial characteristics equations accept by set the below currents
and currents derivative with respect to time into active circulator IMPATT diode
system equations. Active circulator IMPATT diode system fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1 ekt are: j = 0
(first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.
348 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
For λ < 0, t > 0, the selected fixed point is stable otherwise λ > 0, t > 0 is
unstable (Table 1). Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for
λ < 0, t > 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. λ is the
eigenvalue parameter which is established if the fixed point is stable or unstable;
additionally, his absolute value (|λ|) establishes the speed of flow toward or away
from the selected fixed point [2] (Jack and Huseyin 1991). The speeds of flow
toward or away from the selected fixed point for active circulator IMPATT diode
amplifier system currents and currents derivatives with respect to time are:
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
dI10 ðtÞ I 0 ðt þ DtÞ I10 ðtÞ I þ i01 ekðt þ DtÞ ðI1 þ i01 ekt Þ
¼ lim 1 ¼ lim 1
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
i01 ekt ½ekDt 1 ekDt 1 þ kDt dI 0
ðtÞ
¼ lim ! k i01 ekt ; 3 ¼ k i03 ekt
Dt!0 Dt dt
dI1 ðtÞ dI ðtÞ
¼ k i1 ekt ; ¼ k i3 ekt ;
3
dt dt
dIL1 ðtÞ dI 0 ðt D1 Þ
¼ k iL1 ekt ; 1 ¼ k i01 ekt ekD1
dt dt
dI30 ðt D3 Þ dI 0 ðt D1 Þ
¼ k i03 ekt ekD1 ; 1 ¼ k i01 ekt ekD1 ;
dt dt
dI1 ðt s1 Þ
¼ k i1 ekt eks1
dt
dI3 ðt s3 Þ
¼ k i3 ekt eks3 :
dt
dV
We already get dtP1 ¼ X0 sgn½dnðtÞ dt . We add coordinates ½I10 ; I30 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1
0 0 kt
arbitrarily small increments of exponential terms ½i1 ; i3 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1 e and retaining
the first order terms in i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1 .
1 dnðtÞ
ðI1 þ i1 ekt Þ CP 1
ðjÞ
k i01 ekt ¼ X0 sgn½
Lf dt
1 1
þ ðI3 þ i3 ekt Þ CP 2
ðjÞ
Lf Lf
ðjÞ
ðIL1 þ iL1 ekt Þ 0ðjÞ
þ ðI1 þ i01 ekt Þ
Cd Lf
1 0ðjÞ Rc Rc
½Rc Rf ðI3 þ i03 ekt Þ þ ðIL0 1 ! eÞ
Lf Lf Lf
1
dVP
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ Rc
I3 ¼ 0 ; I1 ¼ 0 ; I1 þ I3 ¼ P dt P ; ðIL0 1 ! eÞ 0
C 1C 2 Lf
1 dnðtÞ 1
I1 C P 1 þ I3
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ð#Þ k i01 ekt ¼ X0 sgn½
Lf dt Lf
1 1
CP 2 i1 CP 1 ekt
Lf Lf
ðjÞ
1 ðI þ iL1 ekt Þ
þ i3 CP 2 ekt L1 þ i01
Lf Cd Lf
1 Rc
ekt ½Rc Rf i03 ekt
Lf Lf
350 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
1
k i03 ekt ¼ ðI1 þ i1 ekt Þ CP 2 ðI3 þ i3 ekt Þ CP 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Lf
ðjÞ
1 ðI þ iL1 ekt Þ 0ðjÞ Rc
þ L1 ðI1 þ i01 ekt Þ
Lf Cd Lf Lf
0ðjÞ ½Rc Rf Rc Rload
þ ðI3 þ i03 ekt Þ ðIL0 1 ! eÞ
Lf Lf Lf
k i3 ekt eks3 ; eks3 ! 1
ð##Þ ðjÞ
ðIL þ iL1 ekt Þ 0 0
i1 ekt Lfc þ i3
R
þ 1
Cd Lf
½Rc Rf
Lf RLload f
k i3 ekt
1 dnðtÞ 1
I 1 CP 1
ðjÞ
k i01 ekt þ k i03 ekt ¼ X0 sgn½
Lf dt Lf
1 1
þ I3 CP 2 i1 CP 1 ekt þ i3 CP 2
ðjÞ
Lf Lf
ðjÞ
1 kt ðIL1 þ iL1 ekt Þ
e þ i01 ekt ½Rc Rf
Lf Cd Lf
1 Rc 1 1
þ fI1 CP 2 þ i1 CP 2 ekt I3
ðjÞ ðjÞ
i03 ekt
Lf Lf Lf Lf
ðjÞ
1 1 ðI þ iL1 ekt Þ
CP 1 i3 CP 1 ekt þ L1
Lf Lf Cd L f
Rc ½R c R R
i01 ekt þ i03 ekt k i3 ekt g
f load
Lf Lf Lf
1 dnðtÞ
þ I1 ½CP 2 CP 1
ðjÞ
k ½i01 þ i03 ekt ¼ X0 sgn½
Lf dt
1 1
þ I3 ½CP 2 CP 1
ðjÞ
Lf Lf
1 1
þ i1 ½CP 2 CP 1 ekt þ i3 ½CP 2 CP 1 Rload k ekt
Lf Lf
1 Rc ½Rc Rf 0 kt Rc
þ i01 ekt ½Rc Rf i01 ekt þ i03 ekt i3 e
Lf Lf Lf Lf
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 351
1 dnðtÞ 1
þ ½CP 2 CP 1 ðI1 þ I3 Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ
k ½i01 þ i03 ekt ¼ X0 sgn½
Lf dt Lf
1
þ i1 ½CP 2 CP 1 ekt þ i3 ½CP 2 CP 1 Rload k
Lf
1 Rf Rf
ekt i01 ekt i03 ekt
Lf Lf Lf
dVP
ðjÞ ðjÞ 1
We already found the system fixed points condition: I1 þ I3 ¼ CP dt
CP
1 2
1
dVP
1 dnðtÞ 1
k ½i01 þ i03 ekt ¼ X0 sgn½ þ ½CP 2 CP 1 P dt P
Lf dt Lf C 1 C 2
1
þ i1 ½CP 2 CP 1 ekt þ i3 ½CP 2 CP 1 Rload k
Lf
1 Rf Rf
ekt i01 ekt i03 ekt
Lf Lf Lf
1 dnðtÞ dVP1 1
k ½i01 þ i03 ekt ¼ ½X0 sgn½ þ i1 ½CP 2 CP 1 ekt
Lf dt dt Lf
1
þ i3 ½CP 2 CP 1 Rload k ekt i01 ekt
Lf
Rf Rf
i03 ekt
Lf Lf
dVP1 dnðtÞ 1
¼ X0 sgn½ ) k ½i01 þ i03 ekt ¼ i1 ½CP 2 CP 1 ekt
dt dt Lf
1 Rf Rf
þ i3 ½CP 2 CP 1 Rload k ekt i01 ekt i03 ekt
Lf Lf Lf
1 1 Rf
k ½i01 þ i03 ¼ i1 ½CP 2 CP 1 þ i3 ½CP 2 CP 1 Rload k i01
Lf Lf Lf
0 Rf
i3
Lf
352 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
1 1 Rf
i1 ½CP 2 CP 1 þ i3 ½CP 2 CP 1 Rload k i01
Lf Lf Lf
Rf
i03 k ½i01 þ i03 ¼ 0
Lf
1 1 Rf Rf
i1 ½CP 2 CP 1 þ i3 ðCP 2 CP 1 Þ i01 i03
Lf Lf Lf Lf
1
ði01 þ i03 þ i3 Rload Þ k ¼ 0
Lf
i01 k i1 ¼ 0; i03 k i3 ¼ 0
1 1
i1 ½CP 2 CP 1 þ i3 ðCP 2 CP 1 Þ i01
Lf Lf
Rf Rf 1
i03 ði01 þ i03 þ i3 Rload Þ k ¼ 0
Lf Lf Lf
The active circulator IMPATT diode amplifier system eigenvalues options are
describe in the below table.
Table 3.8 Active circulator IMPATT diode amplifier system eigenvalues options
λ<0 λ>0
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
t=0 I10 ðt¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i01 I10 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i01
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
I30 ðt¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i03 I30 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i03
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i1 I1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I1 þ i1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i3 I3 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ I3 þ i3
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 IL1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
t>0 I10 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i01 ejkjt I10 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i01 ejkjt
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
I30 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i03 ejkjt I30 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i03 ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I1 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i1 ejkjt I1 ðtÞ ¼ I1 þ i1 ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I3 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i3 ejkjt I3 ðtÞ ¼ I3 þ i3 ejkjt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ejkjt IL1 ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ejkjt
t > 0; t → ∞ I10 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ I1
0ðjÞ
I10 ðt ! 1Þ i01 ejkjt
0ðjÞ
I30 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ I3 I30 ðt ! 1Þ i03 ejkjt
I1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ I1
ðjÞ I1 ðt ! 1Þ i1 ejkjt
ðjÞ I3 ðt ! 1Þ i3 ejkjt
I3 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ I3
ðjÞ IL1 ðt ! 1Þ iL1 ejkjt
IL1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ IL1
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 353
We already define
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I1 ðt s1 Þ ¼ I1 þ i1 ekðts1 Þ ; I3 ðt s3 Þ ¼ I3 þ i3 ekðts3 Þ ;
0ðjÞ
I10 ðt D1 Þ ¼ I1 þ i01 ekðtD1 Þ
0ðjÞ ðjÞ
I30 ðt D3 Þ ¼ I3 þ i03 ekðtD3 Þ ; IL1 ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ekt
B dIdt30 C 0 1 1 0
B C N11 . . . N15 B I 0 ðtÞ C B0C B Rload C
B dt C B . .. .. C B 3 C B C 1 dVP1 B Lf C
B dI1 C¼@ . B C B C B C
B dt C . . . A B I1 ðt s1 Þ C þ B 0 C L dt þ B 0 C
B dI3 C @ I3 ðtÞ A @0A f @0 A
@ dt A N51 N55
dIL1 IL1 ðtÞ 0 0
dt
dI3 ðt s3 Þ
þe
dt
dI10
We already know that at fixed point: dt ¼0
0ðjÞ 0ðjÞ
k i03 et ¼ N21 ðI1 þ i01 ekðtD1 Þ Þ þ N22 ðI3 þ i03 ekt Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ N23 ðI1 þ i1 ekðts1 Þ Þ þ N24 ðI3 þ i3 ekt Þ þ N25 ðIL1 þ iL1 ekt Þ
Rload dI3 ðt s3 Þ
Lf dt
dI30
We already know that at fixed point: dt ¼0
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 355
k i03 et ¼ i01 N21 ekðtD1 Þ þ i03 N22 ekt þ i1 N23 ekðts1 Þ þ i3 N24
Rload
ekt þ iL1 N25 ekt k i03 ekðtD3 Þ
Lf
i01 N21 ekt ekD1 þ i03 N22 ekt k i03 et þ i1 N23 ekt eks1 þ i3
Rload 0 kðtD3 Þ
N24 ekt þ iL1 N25 ekt i3 e ¼0
Lf
Rload kD3
i01 N21 ekD1 þ i03 ½N22 e k þ i1 N23
Lf
eks1 þ i3 N24 þ iL1 N25 ¼ 0
dI1 0ðjÞ
¼ N31 I10 ðt D1 Þ ) k i1 ekt ¼ N31 ðI1 þ i01 ekðtD1 Þ Þ ;
dt
0ðjÞ
I1 ¼ 0 ; N31 i01 ekD1 k i1 ¼ 0
dI3 0ðjÞ
¼ N42 I30 ðtÞ ) k i3 ekt ¼ N42 ðI3 þ i03 ekt Þ ;
dt
0ðjÞ
I3 ¼ 0 ; N42 i03 k i3 ¼ 0
i01 ½N11 ekD1 k þ N12 i03 þ N13 i1 eks1 þ N14 i3 þ N15 iL1 ¼ 0
Rload kD3
i01 N21 ekD1 þ i03 ½N22 e k þ i1
Lf
N23 eks1 þ i3 N24 þ iL1 N25 ¼ 0
N31 i01 ekD1 k i1 ¼ 0 ; N42 i03 k i3 ¼ 0 ; k iL1 ¼ 0 ) k iL1 ¼ 0
The small increments Jacobian of our active circulator IMPATT diode amplifier
system is as follow:
356 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
0 1
0 1 i01
!11 ... !15 B 0 C
B i3 C
B . .. .. C B C
B . C B i1 C ¼ 0 ; !11 ¼ N11 ekD1 k;
@ . . . A B C
B C
!51 !55 @ i3 A
iL1
!12 ¼ N12 ; !13 ¼ N13 eks1 ; !14 ¼ N14
Rload
!15 ¼ N15 ; !21 ¼ N21 ekD1 ; !22 ¼ N22
Lf
ekD3 k ; !23 ¼ N23 eks1 ; !24 ¼ N24
!25 ¼ N25 ; !31 ¼ N31 ekD1 ; !32 ¼ 0 ; !33 ¼ k ;
!34 ¼ !35 ¼ 0 ; !41 ¼ 0 ; !42 ¼ N42
!43 ¼ 0 ; !44 ¼ k ; !45 ¼ 0 ; !51 ¼ !52 ¼ !53 ¼ !54 ¼ 0 ; 55 ¼ k
0 1
!11 . . . !15
B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A ; detjA k Ij¼ 0 ; Dðs1 ; D1 ; D3 Þ ¼ detjA k Ij
!51 !55
We inspect the occurrence of any possible stability switching resulting from the
increase of value of time delays s1 ; D1 ; D3 for the active circulator IMPATT diode
amplifier system general characteristic equation Dðs1 ; D1 ; D3 Þ ¼ 0[6].
0 k
0 1 0 1
N21 ekD1 . . . N25 N21 ekD1 . . . N25
B .. .. .. C B .. .. .. C
detB
@ . .
C B
. A N14 det@ . .
C
. A
0 k 0 k
0 kD1
1
N21 e . . . N24
B .. .. .. C
þ N15 detB
@ . .
C
. A
0 0
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 357
P5
We define gi ; i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; 5 functions. Dðs1 ; D1 ; D3 Þ ¼ detjA k Ij ¼ i¼1 gi
gi ¼ gi ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ; l ¼ 1; . . .; 5 ; k ¼ 1; . . .; 5
g1 ¼ g1 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ; g2 ¼ g2 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ
g3 ¼ g3 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ; g4 ¼ g4 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ ; g5 ¼ 0
0 k
0 kD1
1
N21 e . . . N25
B .. .. .. C
g3 ¼ g3 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ ¼ N13 eks1 detB
@ . .
C
. A
0 k
0 kD1
1
N21 e . . . N25
B .. .. .. C
g4 ¼ g4 ðNlk ; Rload ; Lf ; k; D1 ; D3 ; s1 Þ ¼ N14 detB @ . . . A
C
0 k
0 kD1
1
N21 e . . . N24
B .. .. .. C
g5 ¼ N15 detB @ . .
C
. A¼0
0 0
Rload kD3
g1 ¼ ðN11 ekD1 kÞ ðN22 k3 þ k3 e þ k4 k2 N24 N42 Þ
Lf
Rload kðD3 þ D1 Þ
¼ N11 N24 N42 ekD1 k2 þ fN11 e
Lf
Rload kD3
N11 N22 ekD1 g k3 þ ðN11 ekD1 e g
Lf
k4 þ N24 N42 k3 þ N22 k4 k5
g2 ¼ N12 fk3 N21 ekD1 N23 N31 k2 ekðs1 þ D1 Þ g ¼ k3 N12 N21 ekD1
þ N23 N31 N12 k2 ekðs1 þ D1 Þ
358 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
g1 g1 ¼ N11 N24 N42 k2 g1 ¼ ½N11 N24 N42 k2 g1 ¼ N11 N24 N42 ekks k2
Rload
þ fN11 N11 N22
þð
Rload kD
e N22 Þ N11 k3 þ ðN24 N42 N11 N22 ekks Þ k3
Lf
Lf
þ N24 N42 g k3 þ ðN11 ekks þ N22 Þ k4 k5
Rload
Rload þ ðN11 Þ k4 ekD Rload 3
þ fN11 þ N22 g k4 k5 L f þ ðN11 k
Lf Lf
þ N24 N42 k3 þ N22 k4 k5 Rload kks 4
e k Þ eks
Lf
g2 g2 ¼ k3 N12 N21 g2 ¼ ðN12 N23 N31 k2 g2 ¼ N12 N21 ekks k3
þ k2 N12 N23 N31 eks þ N12 N21 k3 Þ ekD þ N12 N23 N31 ekks eks k2
g3 g3 ¼ fN24 N31 N42 N13 k g3 ¼ fN24 N31 N42 N13 k g3 ¼ N13 N31 ekks eks k3
Rload Rload kD Rload ks
þ ðN13 N31 þ ðN13 N31 e þ fN13 N31 e
Lf Lf Lf
N13 N22 N31 Þ k2 N13 N22 N31 Þ k2 N13 N22 N31 ekks g k2 eks
þ N13 N31 k3 g eks þ N13 N31 k3 g ekD N24 N31 N42 N13 ekks eks k
g4 g4 ¼ N14 N21 N42 k2 g4 ¼ N14 N21 N42 k2 g4 ¼ N14 N21 N42 ekks k2
þ N14 N23 N31 N42 eks k þ N14 N23 N31 N42 eks k þ N14 N23 N31 N42 eks ekks k
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 359
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pj ðsÞ k j ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ k þ P2 ðsÞ k2 þ P3 ðsÞ k3 þ
j¼0
X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qj ðsÞ k j ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ k þ q2 ðsÞ k2 þ q3 ðsÞ k3 þ
j¼0
P
5
If we choose D parameter then Dðk; DÞ ¼ gi ¼ Pn ðk; DÞ þ Qm ðk; DÞ ekD .
i¼1
The expression for Pn ðk; DÞ:
X
n
Pn ðk; DÞ ¼ Pj ðDÞ k j ¼ P0 ðDÞ þ P1 ðDÞ k þ P2 ðDÞ k2 þ P3 ðDÞ k3 þ
j¼0
X
m
Qm ðk; DÞ ¼ qj ðDÞ k j ¼ q0 ðDÞ þ q1 ðDÞ k þ q2 ðDÞ k2 þ q3 ðDÞ k3 þ
j¼0
Remark: Balance parameter k (0 < k < 1) appears only in the third case. For all
cases which s and/or k or D include in Pn and Qm expressions, we take the fol-
lowing assumptions for power Taylor approximation series only for these
expressions.
X
1
ðk k sÞn k2 k 2 s 2
ekks ¼ 1 k k sþ ;
n¼0
n! 2
X
1
ðk sÞn k2 s 2
eks ¼ 1 k sþ
n¼0
n! 2
X
1
ðk k sÞn k2 k 2 s 2
ekks ¼ 1þk k sþ ;
n¼0
n! 2
X
1
ðk sÞn k2 s 2
eks ¼ 1þk sþ
n¼0
n! 2
X
1
ðk DÞn k2 D2
ekD ¼ 1 k Dþ ;
n¼0
n! 2
X
1
ðk DÞn k2 D 2
ekD ¼ 1þk Dþ
n¼0
n! 2
360 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
Balance parameter, k only appears in the third case (Case III). We use the
general geometric criterion [BK] and investigate the occurrence of any possible
stability switching resulting from the increase of value of time delay parameters s; D
for the general characteristic equation DðD; s; kÞ ¼ 0 [6].
P
n
In the case our time delay parameter is s: Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pj ðsÞ k j Qm ðk; sÞ ¼
j¼0
P
m
qj ðsÞ k j . In the case our time delay parameter is D:
j¼0
P P
Pn ðk; DÞ ¼ nj¼0 Pj ðDÞ k j ; Qm ðk; DÞ ¼ m j¼0 qj ðDÞ k
j
. n; m 2 N0 ; n [
m; pj ðÞ; qj ðÞ:R þ 0 ! R The expressions are continuous and differentiable func-
tions of s or D.
We summery our Pn ðk; s; kÞ and Qm ðk; s; kÞ expressions in the below table:
There are three cases to analyze stability switching under delay parameter
variation. We choose to analyze the second case (II). It is reader exercise to do the
same analysis for cases I and III. According stability switch criteria [BK],
n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m.
X
1
ðk DÞn
Pn ðk; DÞ ¼ N24 N42 k3 þ N22 k4 k5 ; ekD 1kD
n¼0
n!
Pn ðk; sÞ Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k2 ðN11 N24 N42 Pn ðk; DÞ ¼ N24 N42 k3 Pn ðk; s; kÞ ¼ ½N14 N21
Or þ N14 N21 N42 Þ þ N22 k4 k5 N11 N24 N42 ekks k2
Pn ðk; s; kÞ
þ k3 ðN11
Rload
N11 N22 þ ½N24 N42 N11 N22 ekks
Or Lf
þ N12 N21 ekks k3
Pn ðk; DÞ þ N24 N42 þ N12 N21 Þ
þ ðN11 ekks þ N22 Þ k4 k5
Rload
þ k4 ðN11 þ N22 Þ k5
Lf
Qm ðk; sÞ Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ ðN24 N31 N42 N13 Qm ðk; DÞ ¼ ðN24 N31 N42 N13 Rload kks 4
Qm ðk; s; kÞ ¼ e k
Or þ N14 N23 N31 N42 Þ k þ N14 N23 N31 N42 Þ k Lf
Qm ðk; s; kÞ þ ðN12 N23 N31 þ ðN11 N24 N42 þ N12 N23 N31 þ ½N11
Rload
þ N13 N31 ekks k3
Or Lf
Rload Rload kD
Qm ðk; DÞ þ N13 N31 þ N13 N31 e þ ½N12 N23 N31 ekks
Lf Lf
Rload ks
N13 N22 N31 Þ k2 N13 N22 N31 þ N14 N21 N42 Þ k2 þ N13 N31 e
Lf
þ N13 N31 k3 þ fð
Rload kD
e N22 Þ N11
Lf N13 N22 N31 ekks k2
þ N12 N21 þ N13 N31 g k3 þ ½N14 N23 N42
Rload N24 N42 N13 N31 ekks k
þ ðN11 Þ k4
Lf
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 361
Result: n = 5, m = 4; n > m. n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m
The expression Pn ðk; s; kÞ is as follow:
X
n
Pn ðDÞ ¼ Pj ðDÞ k j ¼ P0 ðDÞ þ P1 ðDÞ k þ P2 ðDÞ
j¼0
q0 ðDÞ ¼ 0; q1 ðDÞ ¼ N24 N31 N42 N13 þ N14 N23 N31 N42
q2 ðDÞ ¼ N11 N24 N42 þ N12 N23 N31 þ N13 N31
Rload
N13 N22 N31 þ N14 N21 N42
Lf
Rload Rload
q3 ðDÞ ¼ N11 N22 N11 þ N12 N21 þ N13 N31 N13 N31 D
Lf Lf
Rload Rload
q4 ðDÞ ¼ N11 D N11
Lf Lf
The homogeneous system for I10 ; I30 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1 leads to a characteristic equation
P
for the eigenvalue λ having the form PðDÞ þ QðDÞ ekD ¼ 0; PðDÞ ¼ 5j¼0 aj
P
k j ; QðDÞ ¼ 4j¼0 cj k j and the coefficients faj ðqi ; ql ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; ql ; sÞg 2 R depend
on qi ; ql and delay s. qi ; ql are any system’s parameters, other parameters kept as a
constant a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a5 ¼ 1
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the variation arguments ðqi ; ql Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and
differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 þ c0 ¼ 0 8 qi ; ql 2 R þ ; that is λ = 0 is of Pðk; DÞ þ Qðk; DÞ eks ¼ 0.
Furthermore, Pðk; DÞ; Qðk; DÞ are analytic functions of λ, for which the following
requirements of the analysis [5, 41] can also be verified in the present case:
(a) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R, then Pði xÞ þ Qði xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek
0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in ω.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; ql Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable with
respect to qi ; ql .
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 363
We assume that Pn ðDÞ and Qm ðDÞ can’t have common imaginary roots. That is
for any real number ω;
Pn ðk ¼ i x; DÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; DÞ 6¼ 0; k2 ¼ x2 ; k3 ¼ i x3
k4 ¼ x4 ; k5 ¼ i x5 :Pn ðk ¼ i x; DÞ ¼ N22 x4 i ½N24 N42 x3 þ x5
jPði x; DÞj2 ¼ N224 N242 x6 þ ½N222 þ 2 N24 N42 x8 þ x10 . We define for
simplicity the following global parameters:
364 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
Furthermore
Hence
PR ði x; DÞ QI ði x; DÞ þ PI ði x; DÞ QR ði x; DÞ
sin hðDÞ ¼
jQði x; DÞj2
PR ði x; DÞ QR ði x; DÞ þ PI ði x; DÞ QI ði x; DÞ
cos hðDÞ ¼
jQði x; DÞj2
N22 x ½X3 x X4 ðDÞ x3 ½N24 N42 x3 þ x5 ½X1 x2 þ X2 ðDÞ x4
4
sin hðDÞ ¼ 2 2
X3 x þ ½X21 2 X3 X4 ðDÞ x4 þ ½X24 ðDÞ 2 X1 X2 ðDÞ x6 þ X22 ðDÞ x8
N22 x4 ½X1 x2 þ X2 ðDÞ x4 ½N24 N42 x3 þ x5 ½X3 x X4 ðDÞ x3
cos hðDÞ ¼
X23 x2 þ ½X21 2 X3 X4 ðDÞ x4 þ ½X24 ðDÞ 2 X1 X2 ðDÞ x6 þ X22 ðDÞ x8
P
Which jointly with Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 ) 5k¼0 U2k x2k ¼ 0 that are continuous and
differentiable in Δ, based on Lema 1and Hence we use theorem 1. This proves the
theorem 2.
Lemma 1 Assume that ω(Δ) is a positive and real root of Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 defined for
D 2 I, which is continuous and differentiable. Assume further that if k ¼ i x
x 2 R then Pn ðk ¼ i x; DÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; DÞ 6¼ 0; D 2 R hold true. Then the
functions Sn ðDÞ; n 2 N0 are continuous and differentiable on I.
Theorem 1 Assume that ω(Δ) is a positive real root of Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 defined for
D 2 I; IR þ 0 , and at some D 2 I, Sn ðD Þ ¼ 0. For some n 2 N0 then a pair of
simple conjugate pure imaginary roots k þ ðD Þ ¼ i xðD Þ; k ðD Þ ¼ i xðD Þ.
Dðk; DÞ ¼ 0 exist at D ¼ D which crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if
dðD Þ [ 0 and cross the imaginary axis from right to left if dðD Þ\0 where
dSn ðDÞ
d ðD Þ ¼ signfd Rek j
þ dD
g ¼ signf
k¼ix þ ðD Þ j g. If xðD Þ ¼ x ðD Þ these
dD D¼D
pair of simple conjugates pure imaginary roots cross the imaginary axis from left to
right if d ðD Þ [ 0 and crosses the imaginary axis from right to left if d ðD Þ\0
dSn ðDÞ
where d ðD Þ ¼ signfd Re k
dD jk¼ix ðD Þ g ¼ signf dD jD¼D g.
If x þ ðD Þ ¼
x ðD Þ ¼ xðD Þ then DðD Þ ¼ 0 and signfdRek j
g ¼ 0, the same is true
dD k¼ixðD Þ
366 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
when S0n ðD Þ ¼ 0. The following result can be useful in identifying values of Δ
where stability switches happened.
Our IMPATT amplifier homogenous system for i01 ; i03 ; i1 ; i3 ; iL1 leads to a char-
acteristic equation for the eigenvalue λ having the form (second case)
Pðk; DÞ þ Qðk; DÞ ekD ¼ 0. Dðs1 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D; kÞ ¼ DðD; kÞ and we use
P ðkDÞn
Taylor series approximation: ekD 1 n¼0 n! 1 k D the Maclaurin ser-
kD
ies is a Taylor series expansion of a e function about zero (0). We get the
following general characteristic equation DðD; kÞ under Taylor series
approximation:
ekD 1 k D.
X
5 X
4
Pn ðk; DÞ ! PðkÞ; Qm ðk; DÞ ! QðkÞ; PðkÞ ¼ aj k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj k j
j¼0 j¼0
feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with
respect to Cf ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . and system parameters.
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 369
@Rek
K1 ðRf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Cf ; Lf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . ¼ const
@Rf k¼ix
@Rek
K1 ðLf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Cf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . ¼ const
@Lf k¼ix
@Rek
K1 ðCf Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lf ; Rf ; Cd ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . ¼ const
@Cf k¼ix
@Rek
K1 ðCd Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . ¼ const
@Cd k¼ix
@Rek
K1 ðRd Þ ¼ ð Þ ; Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Cd ; R1 ; L1 ; D; . . . ¼ const
@Rd k¼ix
@Rek
K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Cd ; R1 ; L1 ; Rd ; . . . ¼ const
@D k¼ix
P5
Hence Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 U2k x
2k
¼ 0. When writing PðkÞ ¼
PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, inserting k ¼ i x into IMPATT
amplifier system’s characteristic equation, ω must satisfy the following:
PR ði x; DÞ QI ði x; DÞ þ PI ði x; DÞ QR ði x; DÞ
sin x D ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði x; DÞj2
PR ði x; DÞ QR ði x; DÞ þ PI ði x; DÞ QI ði x; DÞ
cos x D ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði x; DÞj2
There are no positive xðDÞ solutions for Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0, and we cannot have
stability switches. For any D 2 I, where xðDÞ is a positive solution of Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0,
we can define the angle hðDÞ 2 ½0; 2 p as the solution of sin hðDÞ ¼
; cos hðDÞ ¼ And the relation between the argument hðDÞ and xðDÞ D for
D 2 I must be xðDÞ D ¼ hðDÞ þ n 2 p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps
Dn : I ! R þ 0 given by Dn ðDÞ ¼ hðDÞxðDÞ þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; D 2 I. Let as introduce the
functions I ! R; Sn ðDÞ ¼ D Dn ðDÞ; D 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and dif-
ferentiable in Δ. In the following, the subscripts k; x; Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; . . .
indicate the corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on KðxÞ,
remember in kðLf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; . . .Þ and xðLf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; . . .Þ, and
keeping all parameters except (x) and Δ. The derivation closely follows that in
reference [BK]. Differentiating IMPATT amplifier system characteristic equation
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ ekD ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter (x), and inverting the
derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark:
x ¼ Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; . . .; etc:;
where Pk ¼ @P
@k …etc., Substituting k ¼ i x and bearing i Pði xÞ ¼ Pði xÞ
Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ; i Pk ði xÞ ¼ Px ði xÞ; i Qk ði xÞ ¼ Qx ði xÞ and that
on the surface jPði xÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 , one obtain the following expression:
When (x) can be any IMPATT diode active circulator system’s parameter Lf, Rf,
Cf,… and time delay Δ etc.,. Where for convenience, we dropped the arguments
(i∙ω, x), and where Fx ¼ 2 ½ðPRx PR þ PIx PI Þ ðQRx QR þ QIx QI Þ
Fx ¼ 2 ½ðPRx PR þ PIx PI Þ ðQRx QR þ QIx QI Þ; xx ¼ Fx =Fx We define
U and V:
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 371
Rload Rload
QRD ¼ N11 x4 ; QID ¼ N13 N31 x3 ; FD ¼ 2 ðQRD QR þ QID QI Þ
Lf Lf
PRx PR ¼ 4 N222 x7 ; PIx PI ¼ ½N24 N42 3 þ 5 x2 ½N24 N42 þ x2 x5
QRx QR ¼ 2 ½X1 þ X2 ðDÞ 2 x2 ½X1 þ X2 ðDÞ x2 x3
QIx QI ¼ ½X3 X4 ðDÞ 3 x2 ½X3 X4 ðDÞ x2 x; PRD PR þ PID PI ¼ 0
PID PI ¼ 0; PRD PR ¼ 0; FD ¼ 2 ½ðPRD PR þ PID PI Þ ðQRD QR þ QID QI Þ
Rload
QRD QR ¼ N11 ðX1 þ X2 ðDÞ x2 Þ x6 ;
Lf
Rload
QID QI ¼ N13 N31 ½X3 X4 ðDÞ x2 x4
Lf
Rload
FD ¼ 2 f N11 ðX1 þ X2 ðDÞ x2 Þ x2
Lf
Rload
þ N13 N31 ½X3 X4 ðDÞ x2 g x4
Lf
PR PIx ¼ N22 ½N24 N42 3 þ 5 x2 x6 ;
PI PRx ¼ 4 ½N24 N42 þ x2 N22 x6
QR QIx ¼ ½X1 þ X2 ðDÞ x2 ½X3 X4 ðDÞ 3 x2 x2
QI QRx ¼ ½X3 X4 ðDÞ x2 ½X1 þ X2 ðDÞ 2 x2 2 x2
372 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
@x @x FD
Fx þ FD ¼ 0; D 2 I ) ¼ ;
@D @D Fx
@Rek @x FD
K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þ ; ¼ xD ¼
@D k¼ix @D Fx
2 ½U þ D jPj2 þ i Fx @Rek
K1 ðDÞ ¼ Ref ; sign K1 ðDÞg ¼ signfð Þ g
2
FD þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj @D k¼ix
U@x
@D þ V
sign K1 ðDÞg ¼ signfFx g signfD @x
@D þ x þ jPj2
g. We shall presently
examine the possibility of stability transition (bifurcations) of our system, about the
dVP
0ðÞ 0ðÞ ðÞ ðÞ ðÞ ðÞ 1
ðÞ
equilibrium point E ðÞ ðI1 ; I3 ; I1 ; I3 ; IL1 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; I1 ; CP dt
CP I1 ; IL1 Þ as
1 2
@Rek @Rek
K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þ ; K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Lf ; Rf ; Cf ; Rd ; R1 ; L1 ; . . .
@D k¼ix @D k¼ix
¼ const; x 2 R þ
Numerical analysis: We get the expression for Fðx; DÞ system parameters val-
ues. We find those ω, Δ values which fulfil Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0. We ignore negative,
complex, and imaginary values of ω for specific Δ values. D 2 ½0:001. . .10 and we
can express by 3D function Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0. We plot the stability switch diagram
based on different delay values of our system.
3.4 IMPATT Amplifier Stability Analysis 373
@Rek 2 ½U þ D jPj2 þ i Fx
K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@D FD þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
@Rek 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ FD ðU þ D P2 Þg
K1 ðDÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@D FD2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
The stability switch occur only on those delay values (Δ) which fit the equation:
D ¼ xh þþ ðDÞ
ðDÞ and h þ ðDÞ is the solution of sin hðDÞ ¼ ; cos hðDÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðDÞ if only ω+ is feasible. Additionally, when system’s parameters are known
and the stability switch due to various time delay values Δ is described in the
following expression: (Steven 1994).
Remark: We know Fðx; DÞ ¼ 0 implies it roots xi ðDÞ and finding those delays
values Δ which ωi is feasible. There are Δ values which ωi is complex or imaginary
number, then unable to analyze stability [6, 19, 32].
Fig. 3.16 Multistage IMPATT amplifier circuit with microstrip delay lines
Remark: we neglect the microstrip time delay which is connected between each
stage circulator port 2 to IMPATT diode [70–72].
D1, D2, …, Dn are IMPATT diodes. Each single circulator/IMPATT diode
amplifier is connected to the next amplifier unit by microstrip line. We characterize
each microstrip segment as a delay line. We define our multistage IMPATT
amplifier with additional n delay lines, s1 ; . . .; sn which represent (n) microstrip
segments. We neglect the voltages on delay lines Vsi ! e 8 s1 ; . . .; sn ; 1 i n.
There is a delay in the current which flow through each microstrip delay line
IðtÞ ! Iðt si Þ 8 1 i n.
3.5 Multistage IMPATT Amplifier System … 375
The input current to circuit stage (i) is define as Iin(i)(t) and the output current to
circuit stage (i) is define as Iout(i)(t). The transfer function from circuit stage (i) input
current Iin(i)(t) to output current Iout(i)(t) is IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ fi ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ
IRL ðtÞ ¼ fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ðIoutðn3Þ ðt sn3 sn2 sn1 sn Þ; Dn2 ; Ln2 ; Cn2 ; VBn2 Þ;
Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ
X n
IRL ðtÞ ¼ fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ðIoutðn3Þ ðt sk Þ; Dn2 ; Ln2 ; Cn2 ; VBn2 Þ;
k¼n3
Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ
IRL ðtÞ ¼ fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ð. . .ðf1 ðIinð1Þ ðt s1 s2 . . . sn Þ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ. . .Þ
Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ
X
n
IRL ðtÞ ¼ fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ð. . .ðf1 ðIinð1Þ ðt sk Þ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ. . .ÞDn1 ;
k¼1
Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ; Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ
Multistage IMPATT amplifier one stage current transfer function: The transfer
function from circuit stage (i) input current Iin(i)(t) to output current Iout(i)(t) is
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ fi ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ. Circuit stage active circulator can be described
by system path from RFin port (P1) to RFout port (P3). For simplicity we ignore
MESFET high frequency equivalent model and took it as cutoff element in our
system. The equivalent circuit for one stage current transfer function is present in
the below figure. We ignore the circulator signal path from P3 to P1 since our
amplifier RF signal is feed directly to the next IMPATT amplifier stage. We con-
sider fully matching between two follow amplifier stages (stages i − 1 and i), no
signal reflections.
Branch 1: ICC ¼ ILf ¼ IRf ¼ ICf ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ; Branch 3: ICC ¼ ILf ¼ IRf ¼ ICf ¼
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ
Branch 1: VP1 ¼ VCf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC þ VA ; Branch 3: VA ¼ VCf þ VLf þ VRf þ
VCC þ VP3
378 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
dVC1 dVCd
VA VB ¼ VC1 ; IC1 ¼ C1 ; ICd ¼ Cd ; IL1 þ IC1 ¼ IRd ; IC1 ¼ IRd IL1
dt dt
dVRd dVRd
¼ ¼ Rd ; IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IC1 ;
dIRd dICd
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IC1 ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IRd þ IL1
Z
dVCd 1
ICd ¼ Cd ) VCd ¼ ICd dt;
dt Cd
Z
1
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IRd þ ðVBi VB Þ dt
L1
Z
1
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IRd þ VL1 dt; VL1 ¼ VBi VB ;
L1
Z
1
VB ¼ VCd þ VRd ¼ ICd dt þ VRd
Cd
Z
dVC1 dðVA VB Þ 1
VA VB ¼ VC1 ; IC1 ¼ C1 ; IC1 ¼ C1 ) VA VB ¼ IC1 dt
dt dt C1
Z Z
1 1
VB ¼ VA IC1 dt; IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IRd þ ðVBi VB Þ dt; VBi const
C1 L1
Z Z
1 1
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IRd þ VBi dt VB dt
L1 L
Z1
1 1
¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IRd þ VBi t VB dt
L1 L1
1 1
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IRd þ VBi t
L1 L1
Z Z
1
½VA IC1 dt dt; IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IoutðiÞ ðtÞ
C1
VA ¼ VP1 ðVCf þ VLf þ VRf þ VCC Þ@Branch1 ;
Z
dVCf 1
IinðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ Cf ) V Cf ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ dt
dt Cf
Z Z
1 dIinðiÞ ðtÞ 1
VA ¼ VP1 ð IinðiÞ ðtÞ dt þ Lf þ IinðiÞ ðtÞ Rf þ IinðiÞ ðtÞ dtÞ
Cf dt CC
dVA dVP1 1 d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ 1
¼ ½ IinðiÞ ðtÞ þ Lf þ Rf þ IinðiÞ ðtÞ
dt dt Cf dt2 dt CC
dVA dVP1 1 1 d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ
¼ ½ð þ Þ IinðiÞ ðtÞ þ Lf þ Rf
dt dt CC Cf dt2 dt
Z ZZ
1 1 1
IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IRd þ VBi t VA dt þ IC1 dt dt
L1 L1 L1 C1
Z
dIoutðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ dIRd 1 1 1
¼ þ VBi VA þ IC1 dt
dt dt dt L1 L1 L1 C1
Z
d dIoutðiÞ ðtÞ dIinðiÞ ðtÞ dIRd 1 1 1
f ¼ þ VBi VA þ IC1 dtg
dt dt dt dt L1 L1 L1 C1
dnðtÞ
dj j
dt ¼ sgn½dnðtÞ 8 dnðtÞ 6¼ 0; dVP1 ¼ 0 for dnðtÞ ¼ 0
dnðtÞ dt dt dt dt
d½
dt
dVP1
Fig. 3.20 IMPATT amplifier circuit VP1 and dt functions of time
ðÞ ! ðÞ
d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ 1 dnðtÞ 1 1 d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ
¼ fX 0 sgn½ ½ð þ Þ I inðiÞ ðtÞ þ L f
dt2 dt2 L1 dt CC Cf dt2
dIinðiÞ ðtÞ 1
þ Rf g þ ½IinðiÞ ðtÞ IoutðiÞ ðtÞ
dt L1 C1
d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ X0 dnðtÞ 1 1 1 Lf d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ
¼ sgn½ þ ð þ Þ I inðiÞ ðtÞ þ
dt2 dt2 L1 dt L1 CC Cf L1 dt2
dIinðiÞ ðtÞ Rf 1 1
þ þ IinðiÞ ðtÞ IoutðiÞ ðtÞ
dt L1 L1 C1 L1 C1
d 2 IoutðiÞ ðtÞ 1 Lf d 2 IinðiÞ ðtÞ Rf dIinðiÞ ðtÞ
þ IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ ð1 þ Þ þ
dt 2 L1 C1 L1 dt2 L1 dt
1 1 1 1 X0 dnðtÞ
þ ½ð þ Þ þ IinðiÞ ðtÞ sgn½
L1 CC Cf C1 L1 dt
dVP1 dnðtÞ
Case I: dt ¼ 0 for dt ¼0
dVP1 dnðtÞ
Case II: dt ¼ X0 for dt [0
dVP1 dnðtÞ
Case III: dt ¼ X0 for dt \0
Next it is reader exercise to find IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ fi ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ function.
FET RF transistor is biased by using two power supplies, one for VDS and the other
for VGS. Another way to bias microwave FET is to use source resistor. The source
resistor has the advantage of providing feedback to stabilize the FET performance
and requires only one power supply. Once the transistor has been properly biased, it
must be matched to microstrip transmission line. By implementing biasing and
matching elements to RF microwave FET, each electrode must be simultaneously
connected to an RF circuit and a DC circuit, and the two circuits must not interfere.
The required isolation between the biasing and the matching circuit is done with RF
chocks (which pass the DC and block the RF) and coupling capacitors which pass
RF and block DC [33, 34, 62].
Cin—Input coupling capacitor. It allows the input microwave signal X(t) to enter
the transistor gate but prevents the input microstrip line from shorting out the gate
bias voltage.
Lin—We use RF chock because the gate must be connected to DC ground, but
the RF must not leak through this ground.
The RF FET source port is connected to RF ground through coupling capacitor
Cs which allows the FET source to be at RF ground. It allows the biasing source
resistor Rs to be used between the source and DC ground.
The FET drain port is connected to the drain resistor Rd through RF choke Ld,
which is connected to the positive supply voltage Vdd. The RF choke Ld presents
the microwave signal from being shorted out by the drain resistor Rd and the power
supply Vdd. Coupling capacitor Cout allows the RF microwave signal to pass into
the output microstrip line and the load Rload, but prevents the output microstrip line,
which is a DC ground from shorting out the drain voltage. We represent our circuit
microstrip elements as a delay lines Tau1, Tau2, Tau3, Tau4 (s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; s4 ).
We neglect the voltages on delay lines Vsi ! e 8 s1 ; . . .; s4 ; 1 i 4. There
is a delay in the current which flow through each microstrip delay line
IðtÞ ! Iðt si Þ 8 1 i 4. Next is to investigate how these delay line elements
influence our circuit performance and stability. Input and output matching circuits
can be π or T models. We use for our analysis the FET small signal equivalent
circuit (reduced version) and input and output T matching network. We give dif-
ferent name to RF chocke Ld, Ldd (Ld is the FET small signal equivalent circuit
drain inductance) and drain resistor Rd, Rdd (Rd is the FET small signal equivalent
circuit drain resistance). Ld ! Ldd ; Rd ! Rdd . Since we neglect the voltages on the
delay lines Vsi ! e 8 s1 ; . . .; s4 ; 1 i 4 the voltages on each delay line’s ports is
the same (consider it like a short contact). We write the FET small signal equivalent
circuit for our analysis:
dILdd
VA11 VA10 ¼ Ldd ; ILd ðt s3 Þ þ ILdd ðt s3 Þ
dt
dðVA10 VA12 Þ
¼ ICout1 ðtÞ ; ICout1 ¼ Cout1
dt
dILout1
VA12 ¼ Lout1 ;
dt
dðVA12 VA13 Þ
ICout1 ¼ ILout1 þ ICout2 ; ICout2 ¼ Cout2 ; ICout ðtÞ ¼ ICout2 ðt s4 Þ
dt
dðVA13 VA14 Þ VA
ICout ¼ IRload ; ICout ¼ Cout ; IRload ¼ 14 ; VO ¼ VA14
dt Rload
We write FET small signal equivalent circuit’s Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL)
for circuit’s node A2, A3,…,A16.
Table 3.11 FET combined biasing and matching equivalent circuit’s Kirchhoff’s Current Law
(KCL) and expressions
KCL @ Ax (x = 2,…,16) Expression of Kirchhoff’s current law
1 A2 ICin1 ðtÞ ¼ ICin ðt s1 Þ
2 A3 ICin ðt s1 Þ ¼ ICin1 ðtÞ ¼ ILin1 ðtÞ þ ICin2 ðtÞ
3 A4 ICin2 ðt s2 Þ ¼ ILin ðtÞ þ ILg ðtÞ
4 A5 ILg ¼ IRg þ ICpgs
5 A6 IRg ¼ ICgd þ ICgs
6 A7 ICgd ¼ Id þ ICds þ IRds þ IRd
7 A8 IRd ¼ ILd þ ICpds
8 A9 ICgs ¼ IRi
9 A10 ILd ðt s3 Þ þ ILdd ðt s3 Þ ¼ ICout1 ðtÞ
10 A11 IRdd ¼ ILdd
(continued)
3.6 FET Combined Biasing and Matching Circuit Stability Analysis 385
d d
ICin ¼ Cin ðVA1 VA2 Þ ¼ Cin ðXðtÞ VA2 Þ;
dt dt
d d dIL
ICin1 ¼ Cin1 ðVA2 VA3 Þ ¼ Cin1 ðVA2 Lin1 in1 Þ
dt dt dt
dXðtÞ dVA2 dVA2 d 2 ILin1
ICin ¼ Cin ð Þ; ICin1 ¼ Cin1 ð Lin1 Þ;
dt dt dt dt2
1 dXðtÞ dVA2
ICin ¼
Cin dt dt
dVA2 dXðtÞ 1 1 dVA2 d 2 ILin1
¼ ICin ; ICin1 ¼ Lin1
dt dt Cin Cin1 dt dt2
2
dVA2 1 d ILin1
) ¼ ICin1 þ Lin1
dt Cin1 dt2
dXðtÞ 1 1 d 2 ILin1
ICin ¼ ICin1 þ Lin1 ;
dt Cin Cin1 dt2
d d dIL dIL
ICin2 ¼ Cin2 ðVA3 VA4 Þ ¼ Cin2 ðLin1 in1 Lin in Þ
dt dt dt dt
d 2 ILin1 d 2 ILin
ICin2 ¼ Cin2 ðLin1 Lin 2 Þ;
dt2 dt Z
dILg dILin 1 dIL
VA4 VA5 ¼ Lg ) Lin ICpgs dt ¼ Lg g
dt dt Cpgs dt
d 2 ILin 1 d 2 I Lg d
Lin 2
I C pgs
¼ Lg 2
; ICds ¼ Cds ðVA7 VA15 Þ;
dt Cpgs dt dt
VA7 VA15
IRds ¼ ) IRds Rds ¼ VA7 VA15
Rds
Z
dIR 1 1
ICds ¼ Cds Rds ds ; VA5 ¼ ICpgs dt; VA8 ¼
dt Cpgs Cpds
Z Z
1
ICpds dt; VA6 ¼ ICpgs dt IRg Rg
Cpgs
386 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
Z
1 d 1
VA 7 ¼ I R d Rd þ ICpds dt; ICgd ¼ Cgd ½
Cpds dt Cpgs
Z Z
1
ICpgs dt IRg Rg IRd Rd ICpds dt
Cpds
1 1 dIR dIR
ICgd ¼ Cgd ½ ICpgs ICpds Rg g Rd d ;
Cpgs Cpds dt dt
dIRS
VA15 ¼ IRs Rs þ LS
Z dt
1 dIR 1 dIR
V¼ ICgs dt; Ri i ¼ ICpgs Rg g
Cgs dt Cpgs dt
dIRS d 2 IR 1
RS LS 2 S ICgs
dt dt Cgs
dICgs 1 dIR dIR d 2 IR 1
IRi ¼ ICgs ; Ri ¼ ICpgs Rg g RS S LS 2 S ICgs
dt Cpgs dt dt dt Cgs
Z Z
1 1 dIL
VA 8 ¼ ICpds dt; VA10 ¼ ICpds dt Ld d ; VA11 ¼ Vdd Rdd IRdd
Cpds Cpds dt
Z
1 dILd dILdd
Vdd Rdd IRdd ICpds dt þ Ld ¼ Ldd
Cpds dt dt
Z
d 1 dILd d dIL
fVdd Rdd IRdd ICpds dt þ Ld g ¼ fLdd dd g
dt Cpds dt dt dt
dVdd dIR 1 d 2 IL d 2 ILdd dVdd
Rdd dd ICpds þ Ld 2 d ¼ Ldd ; ¼0
dt dt Cpds dt dt2 dt
dIRdd 1 d 2 IL d 2 ILdd
Rdd ICpds þ Ld 2 d ¼ Ldd
dt Cpds dt dt2
Z Z
1 1 dIL
VA 8 ¼ ICpds dt; VA10 ¼ ICpds dt Ld d
Cpds Cpds dt
Z
d 1 dILd dILout1
ICout1 ¼ Cout1 ½ ICpds dt Ld Lout1
dt Cpds dt dt
1 d 2 IL d 2 ILout1
¼ Cout1 ½ ICpds Ld 2 d Lout1
Cpds dt dt2
Z
dIL 1
VA12 ¼ Lout1 out1 ; VA14 ¼ IRload Rload ; VA13 ¼ ICout dt þ IRload Rload
dt Cout
Z
d dILout1 1
ICout2 ¼ Cout2 ½Lout1 ICout dt IRload Rload
dt dt Cout
d 2 ILout1 1 dIR
¼ Cout2 ½Lout1 ICout Rload load
dt2 Cout dt
2
d ILout1 1 dIR
ICout2 ¼ ICout ¼ IRload ; ICout2 ¼ Cout2 ½Lout1 ICout Rload load
dt2 Cout dt
d 2 ILout1 1 dIRload
IRload ¼ Cout2 ½Lout1 IRload Rload
dt2 Cout dt
3.6 FET Combined Biasing and Matching Circuit Stability Analysis 387
dXðtÞ 1 1 d 2 ILin1
ICin ¼ ICin ðt s1 Þ þ Lin1 ; ICin2
dt Cin Cin1 dt2
d ½ICin ðt s1 Þ ICin2 ðtÞ
2
d 2 ILin
¼ Cin2 ðLin1 L in Þ
dt2 dt2
1 1 dIR dIR
ICgd ¼ Cgd ½ ICpgs ICpds Rg g Rd d
Cpgs Cpds dt dt
388 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
dIRdd 1 d 2 IL d 2 ILdd
Rdd ICpds þ Ld 2 d ¼ Ldd ; ICout ¼ IRload ; IRload ðtÞ¼ICout ðtÞ
dt Cpds dt dt2
¼ ICout2 ðt s4 Þ
1 d 2 IL d 2 ILout1
ILd ðt s3 Þ þ ILdd ðt s3 Þ ¼ Cout1 ½ ICpds Ld 2 d Lout1
Cpds dt dt2
d 2 ILout1 1 dICout2 ðt s4 Þ
ICout2 ðt s4 Þ ¼ Cout2 ½Lout1 ICout2 ðt s4 Þ Rload
dt2 Cout dt
lim ICin ðt s1 Þ ¼ ICin ðtÞ; lim ILd ðt s3 Þ ¼ ILd ðtÞ ; lim ILdd ðt s3 Þ ¼ ILdd ðtÞ
t!1 t!1 t!1
lim ICin2 ðt s2 Þ ¼ ICin2 ðtÞ; lim ICout2 ðt s4 Þ ¼ ICout2 ðtÞ
t!1 t!1
½ICin ; ILin1 ; ICin2 ; ILin ; ICpgs ,ICds ; IRds ; ICgd ; ICpds ; IRg ; IRd ,ICgs ; IRs ; IRdd ; ILd ; ILdd ; ILout1 ; ICout2
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x; y; iL1 ; iRj ; iRs ekt and retaining
the first order terms in ICin ; ILin1 ; ICin2 ; ILin ; ICpgs ; ICds ; IRds ; ICgd ; . . . The system of ho-
mogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigen-
values. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set the below circuit
variables and circuit variables derivative with respect to time into equivalent circuit
for FET equations. FET circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of
exponential form ½iCin ; iLin1 ; iCin2 ; iLin ; iCpgs ; iCds ; iRds ; iCgd ; . . . ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed
point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ICin ðtÞ ¼ ICin þ iCin ekt ; ICin ðt s1 Þ ¼ ICin þ iCin ekðts1 Þ ;
ðjÞ dILin1 ðtÞ
ILin1 ðtÞ ¼ ILin1 þ iLin1 ekt ; ¼ iLin1 k ekt
dt
d 2 ILin1 ðtÞ dIC ðt s1 Þ
¼ iLin1 k2 ekt ; in ¼ iCin k ekðts1 Þ ;
dt2 dt
d 2 ICin ðt s1 Þ
¼ iCin k2 ekðts1 Þ
dt2
ðjÞ dIL ðtÞ d 2 ILin ðtÞ
ILin ðtÞ ¼ ILin þ iLin ekt ; in ¼ iLin k ekt ;
dt dt2
kt ðjÞ kt
¼ iLin k e ; ICin2 ðtÞ ¼ ICin2 þ iCin2 e
2
1 1
iCin ¼ iCin eks1 þ Lin1 iLin1 k2 ; iCin2
Cin Cin1
¼ Cin2 ðLin1 ½iCin eks1 iCin2 Lin iLin Þ k2
1
Lin iLin k2 iCpgs ¼ Lg ½iCin2 eks2 iLin k2 ; iCds ¼ Cds Rds iRds k
Cpgs
1 1
iCgd ¼ Cgd iCpgs Cgd iCpds Cgd ½Rg iRg þ Rd iRd k
Cpgs Cpds
1 1
Ri iCgs k ¼ iCpgs Rg iRg k RS iRs k LS iRs k2 iCgs
Cpgs Cgs
1
Rdd iRdd k iCpds þ Ld iLd k2 ¼ Ldd iLdd k2
Cpds
1
iLd eks3 þ iLdd eks3 ¼ Cout1 ½ iCpds Ld iLd k2 Lout1 iLout1 k2
Cpds
1
iCout2 eks4 ¼ Cout2 ½Lout1 iLout1 k2 iCout2 eks4 Rload iCout2 k2 eks4
Cout
392 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
Exercises
1:1 Draw the circuit of bipolar transistor with feedback loop at microwave
frequencies equivalent circuit. Input Microwave RF source X(t). We con-
sider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |fX(t)| 1 and A0 |
dfX ðtÞ
fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 ) dXðtÞdt ¼ dt ! e . Find system dif-
ferential equations and fixed points.
1:2 Discuss stability analysis, linearization, and find system Jacobian elements
at fixed points. How Delta (d ; 0\d\1) feedback balance resistor param-
eter influences our system stability?
Exercises 393
2:1 Draw system circuit bipolar transistor with two feedback loops equivalent
circuit at microwave frequencies. Input Microwave RF source X(t). We
consider Microwave RFin signal X(t) = A0 + fX(t); |fX(t)| 1 and A0 |
dfX ðtÞ
fX(t)| then XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fX ðtÞ A0 ) dXðtÞ
dt ¼ dt ! e
Find system differential equations and fixed points.
2:2 Discuss stability analysis, linearization, and find Jacobian elements at fixed
points. How DeltaA (dA ; 0\dA \1) and DeltaB (dB ; 0\dB \1) feedback
balance resistor parameters influence our system stability? dA 6¼ dB
394 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
3:1. Draw full small signal equivalent circuit for FETs system and write FETs
system differential Eqs.
3:2. Find FETs system fixed points, How our system fixed points change if
R3 = 0? How our system fixed points change if capacitor C1 is
disconnected?
3:3. Discuss RF FETs system standard local stability analysis about anyone of
the equilibrium points. How the stability changes if R3 = 0?
3:4. Classify RF FETs system fixed points and discuss bifurcation for different
values of R1, R2, R3 resistors.
Exercises 395
We consider RFin signal XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fx ðtÞ; jfx ðtÞj\ ¼ 1 and A0 jfx ðtÞj then
XðtÞ ¼ A0 þ fx ðtÞjA0 jfx ðtÞj A0 ; jfx ðtÞj 1.
4:1 Draw full small signal equivalent circuit for FET RF amplifier and write
system differential equations.
4:2 Find JFET amplifier circuit fixed points, How our system fixed points
change if C4 is disconnected?
4:3 Discuss JFET amplifier standard local stability analysis about anyone of the
equilibrium points. How the stability changes if C3 is disconnected?
4:4 Classify JFET amplifier circuit fixed points and discuss bifurcation for
different values of L3, L4.
4:5 L3 is disconnected, How our JFET amplifier circuit behavior changes?
4:6 Capacitor C5 is disconnected, How our system bifurcation behavior
changes?
396 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
5. We have IMPATT amplifier system which is constructed from three ports active
circulator and two IMPATT diodes. The circulator is used to separate input and
output signals. We consider IMPATT diodes chip RF equivalent circuit which
can be represent as a series resistor and capacitor RD1, CD1 and RD2, CD2
respectively for the first IMPATT diode D1 and second IMPATT diode D2.
RD1 < 0, RD2 < 0. RD1 and RD2 are the terminal negative resistances of the
packaged diodes (D1 and D2). IMPATT diodes act as an amplifier in the neg-
ative differential resistance characteristics.
s1 is the time delay for ARB1 microstrip. s2 is the time delay for ARB2
microstrip. s3 is the time delay for ARB3 microstrip. Rload is the circuit load
resistance. V1, V2 are DC voltage sources (bias voltages to IMPATT diodes D1
and D2 respectively). V1 6¼ V2 is different biasing voltages. R1, R2 are parasitic
resistances of DC voltage sources. L1, CA—inductor and capacitor of Bias-T
circuit for D1. L2, CB—inductor and capacitor of Bias-T circuit for D2. ARB1,
ARB2, and ARB3 are circuit microstrip delay lines (s1 ; s2 ; s3 ). D1, D2—first and
second IMPATT diodes.
5:1 Draw system amplifier full equivalent circuit and find differential equations.
Find fixed points and consider amplifier system input voltage
VP1 ¼ C þ nðtÞ, Γ is constant voltage and ξ(t) is RF signal in time.
5:2 Write system differential equations in matrix representation. Discuss system
eigenvalues and related fixed points classification.
5:3 If we short inductor L1 in our amplifier system, How it influences system
stability?
5:4 If we short RA in our amplifier system, How it influences system stability?
Exercises 397
5:5 If we short diode D2, How it influences system differential equations, fixed
points and stability?
5:6 If we disconnect diode D1, How it influences system differential equations,
fixed points and stability?
Hint: The delay parameters s1 ; s2 and s3 are related to currents which flows
through micro strips ARB1, ARB2, and ARB3. We can consider additional delay
parameters D1 ; D2 ; D3 for the current derivatives which flows through micro strips
respectively.
6. We have two sets of multistage IMPATT amplifiers. The output of our system
is a summation of two set’s outputs. The first set of multistage IMPATT
amplifier has additional k1 delay lines s1 ; s3 ; s5 ; . . .; s2n1 for n n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k1
which represents ð2 k1 1Þ IMPATT diode/active circulator circuit stages.
The delay lines for the first set are exist only on odd stages outputs. The second
set of multistage IMPATT amplifiers has additional k2 delay lines
s2 ; s4 ; s6 ; . . .; s2n ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k2 which represents ð2 k2 Þ IMPATT
diode/active circulator circuit stages. The delay lines for the second set are exist
only on even stages outputs (k1 6¼ k2). The first set of multistage IMPATT
amplifiers is feed by microwave RF signal X1(t) and the second set of multi-
stage IMPATT amplifiers is feed by microwave RF signal X2(t); X1(t) 6¼ X2(t).
X1 ðtÞ ¼ C1 þ n1 ðtÞ X2 ðtÞ ¼ C2 þ n2 ðtÞ. Γ1, Γ2 are constant voltages (Γ1 6¼ Γ2)
and ξ1(t), ξ2(t) are RF signals in time ξ1(t) 6¼ ξ2(t).
(i) is defined as Iin(i)(t) in the two sets respectively and the output current for
circuit stage (i) is defined as Iout(i)(t) in the two sets respectively. The transfer
function from circuit stage (i) input current Iin(i)(t) to output current Iout(i)(t) is
define as IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ . . .; IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ g1i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ for the first set
and IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ ;IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ g2i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ for the second set
respectively. g1i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ 6¼ g2i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ
6:1 Find the expression for IRload(t) as a function of the two set’s outputs
functions.
6:2 Find the two functions for the first and second sets: g1i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ;
Ci ; VBi Þ and g2i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ
6:3 Find the expressions for IRload(t) if X1(t) = 0 or X2(t) = 0.
6:4 How our system behavior changes if each IMPATT/active circulator
amplifier stage in the two sets suffers from short Bias-T’s inductor or
shorted Bias-T’s capacitor?
6:5 How our system behavior changes if two set’s input RF signals are as
follow: X1 ðtÞ ¼ C þ nðtÞ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ a1 X1 ðtÞ þ a2 X12 ðtÞ. Γ is a constant
voltage. ξ(t) is a RF signal. a1, a2 are constants.
7. We have system of three sets of multistage IMPATT amplifiers. The RF
microwave signal input to the third set is a summation of two signals: first is the
output signal from the first set and second is the output signal from the second
set. The first set is constructed from multistage IMPATT amplifier which has a
delay line in each output stage. The number of IMPATT/active circulator stages
in the first set is k1 and the number of delay lines is k1 (s1 ; s2 ; . . .; sk1 ). k1 can be
odd or even number. The second set of multistage IMPATT amplifier has
additional k2 delay lines s1 ; s3 ; s5 ; . . .; s2n1 ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k2 which represent
ð2 k2 1Þ IMPATT/ active circulator circuit stages. The delay lines for the
second set are exist only on odd stages outputs. The third set of multistage
IMPATT amplifier has additional k3 delay lines s2 ; s4 ; s6 ; . . .; s2n ; n ¼
1; 2; . . .; k3 which represent 2 k3 IMPATT/active circulator stages. The delay
lines for the third set are exist only on even stages outputs (k1 6¼ k2 6¼ k3 ). The
first set of multistage IMPATT amplifiers is feed by microwave RF signal
X1(t); and the second set of multistage IMPATT amplifier is feed by microwave
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
RF signal X2(t); X1(t) 6¼ X2(t). X1 ðtÞ ¼ C þ nðtÞ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ 1 þ X1 ðtÞ.
Γ is constant voltage and ξ(t) is RF signal in time. Each system IMPATT
equivalent circuit is constructed from IMPATT diode and Bias-T circuit which
includes DC voltage source (bias voltage to IMPATT diode), parasitic resis-
tance of the DC voltage source, inductor and capacitor. We consider IMPATT
diode acts as an amplifier. We neglect the microstrip time delay which is
connected between each stage circulator port 2 to IMPATT diode. We neglect
the voltages on system delay lines Vsn ! e 8 n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k1 ; Vs2n1 ! e 8 n ¼
1; 2; . . .; k2 and Vs2n ! e 8 n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; k3 .
Exercises 399
There is a delay in the current that flow through each microstrip delay line in
the three sets of multistage IMPATT amplifier in our system.
8 1 n k1 first set ; 8 1 n k2 second set ; 8 1 n k3 third set
The input current for circuit stage (i) is defined as Iin(i)(t) in all sets and the
output current for circuit stage (i) is defined as Iout(t) in all sets. The transfer
function from circuit stage (i) input current Iin(i)(t) to output current Iout(i)(t) in
set m (m = 1,2,3 stand for set number). IoutðiÞ ðtÞ ¼ gmi ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ,Di ;
Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ 8 m ¼ 1; 2; 3 (set number).
7:1 Find the expression for IRload(t) as a function of the three set’s output
functions.
7:2 Find the three functions (m = 1,2,3), gmi ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ.
7:3 Find the expression for IRload(t) if X1(t) = 0.
7:4 Find the expression for IRload(t) if X2(t) = 0.
7:5 How our system behavior changes if each IMPATT diode/active circulator
amplifier stage in the second set is suffered from short Bias-T’s inductor or
short Bias-T’s capacitor?
7:6 How our system behavior changes if each IMPATT diode/active circulator
amplifier stage in the third set is suffered from short Bias-T’s inductor or
short Bias-T’s capacitor?
400 3 Microwave Semiconductor Amplifiers Analysis
8:1 Find the expression for IRA(t), IRB(t), IR-Q(t), as a function of the two set’s
outputs functions.
8:2 Find the two functions for the first and second sets: g1i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ;
Ci ; VBi Þ and g2i ðIinðiÞ ðtÞ; Di ; Li ; Ci ; VBi Þ
8:3 Find the expressions for IR-Q(t)if X1(t) = 0 or X2(t) = 0.
8:4 How our system behavior changes if each IMPATT/active circulator
amplifier stage in the two sets suffers from short Bias-T’s inductor or
shorted Bias-T’s capacitor and additionally RA is disconnected?
8:5 How our system behavior changes if two set’s input RF signals are as
follow: X1 ðtÞ ¼ C þ nðtÞ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ a1 X1 ðtÞ þ a2 X12 ðtÞ. Γ is a constant
voltage. ξ(t) is a RF signal. a1, a2 are constants and RB is disconnected?
9. We have a system of two sets of multistage IMPATT amplifier which feed load
resistance RL. Each circulator/IMPATT diode amplifier stage gets RF signal
from the previous amplifier unit and after amplification feeds the RF signal to
the next amplifier unit. Input RF microwave signal to the first set is defined as
X1(t) and to the second set X2(t). The function expression which characterize
our load resistance current in time is as follow:
X
n
IRL ¼ fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ð. . .ðf1 ðIinð1Þ ðt sk Þ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ. . .Þ; Dn1 ; Ln1 ; Cn1 ; VBn1 Þ;
k¼3
Dn ; Ln ; Cn ; VBn Þ þ g2 ðg1 ðIinð1Þ ðt s1 s2 Þ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ; D2 ; L2 ; C2 ; VB2 Þ
The first set is characterized by the f functions and the second set is charac-
terized by the g function.
First set: sk ¼ jsk1 ð1Þk þ sk2 ð1Þk þ 1 j 8 n
k
3 is recursive function
of micro strip delay line parameter in the first set.
Second set:
0
s1 [ 0; s2 [ 0; Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutð2Þ ðt s2 Þ; Iinð1Þ ðtÞ ¼ n2 ðX2 ðtÞÞ
Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ g2 ðIoutð1Þ ðt s1 Þ; D2 ; L2 ; C2 ; VB2 Þ; Iinð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ Ioutð1Þ ðt s1 Þ
0
Ioutð1Þ ðtÞ ¼ g1 ðIinð1Þ ðtÞ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ; Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ g2 ðIoutð1Þ ðt s1 s2 Þ; D2 ; L2 ; C2 ; VB2 Þ
0
Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ ¼ g2 ðg1 ðIinð1Þ ðt s1 s2 Þ; D1 ; L1 ; C1 ; VB1 Þ; D2 ; L2 ; C2 ; VB2 Þ:
0
The system’s summation operator inputs are Ioutð2Þ ðtÞ and fn ðfn1 ðfn2 ð. . .Þ
9:3 The system’s first set of IMPATT multistage amplifiers has micro strip
delay lines only on odd places of IMPATT diode/active circulator stages.
Write the related functions for IRL(t) and draw our system. How the
dynamic of the system changes?
9:4 System’s first set stages is suffered from Bias-T’s short capacitor.
How our system functionality changes? Find the related f functions for that
case.
9:5 We change the direction polarity of each IMPATT diode in the first set.
How it influences our system functionality. Find the expression for IRL(t)
and transformation function in each multistage amplifier in the first set.
9:6 The recursive function of micro strip delay lines in the first set is as follow:
How our system dynamic changes? Write all possible options for
s3 ; s4 ; s5 ; s6 ; . . .; sn . Analyze the IRL(t) expression for that case.
10. We have a system of RF FET transistor combined biasing and matching circuit.
The RF FET transistor is N channel JFET and the input and output matching
circuits are Pi type. We represent our circuit microstrip elements as a delay lines τ1,
…,τ6 (τk+1 = τk + Γ τk−1) for C 2 ½1; . . .; 10 ; k ¼ 2; . . .; 5 and τ1 = τ, τ2 = τ2.
We neglect the voltages on the delay lines Vsi ! e ; s1 ; . . .; s6 ; 1 i 6. There
is a delay in the current which flows through each microstrip delay line
IðtÞ ! Iðt si Þ 8 1 i 6. We use for our analysis the FET small signal
equivalent circuit (reduced version). The RF choke Ldd presents the microwave
signal from being shorted out by the drain resistor Rdd through RF choke Ldd,
which is connected to the positive supply voltage Vdd. Input and output capac-
itors are Cin and Cout. X(t) is a input microwave RF source.
Exercises 403
10:1 Draw our system complete circuit which includes small signal equivalent
circuit for FET.
10:2 Write system represented differential equations with delay variables in
time (τ1,…,τ6 delay parameters).
10:3 Find our system small increments Jacobian and characteristic Eq.
10:4 Discuss stability switching under delay parameter (τ) variation and Γ
parameter variation.
10:5 How our system dynamic changes if sk þ 1 ¼ sk C þ Csk sk1 sk þ 1 ¼
sk C þ Csk sk1 8 C 2 ½1; . . .; 10 ; k ¼ 2; . . .; 5. Discuss stability
Switching under delay parameter (τ) variation and Γ parameter variation.
10:6 Resistor Rs is disconnected. How our system dynamic changes? Discuss
stability switching under delay parameter (τ) variation and Γ parameter
variation.
Chapter 4
Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching
Network Stability Analysis
An amplifier is an active device that has the ability to amplify voltage, amplify
current or amplify both voltage and current. There are some types of amplifiers.
Amplifiers types: zero frequency amplifiers (DC amplifiers), low frequency
amplifiers (audio amplifiers), and high frequency amplifiers (RF amplifiers).
Power is P = VI, when current (I) or voltage (V) is raising then will create power
amplification. Amplifiers come in three basic flavors: Common Base (CB)
amplifiers, Common Collector (CC) amplifiers, and Common Emitters (CE)
amplifiers. It depends whether the base, collector, or emitter is common to both
the input and output of the amplifier. Common Base (CB) amplifier, input signal
inserted at emitter (E) and output signal taken from the collector (C). The CB
amplifier can operate as a voltage amplifier for low input impedance circuits. The
most popular amplifier circuit is Common Emitter (CE). The CE amplifier has a
greater current gain and voltage gain combination than any other type. CE
amplifier makes excellent power amplifiers. Common Emitter (CE) amplifier,
input signal inserted at the base (B) and output signal taken from the collector
(C). The CE amplifier’s output voltage is shifted by *180° in phase compared to
CE amplifier’s input signal. At RF frequencies there is an effect of “positive
feedback”, which creates amplifier instability and oscillation. “Positive feed-
back” is when there is internal feedback capacitance between the transistor’s
collector and its base. It cause to undesired CE oscillations. At a specific fre-
quency this capacitance will send an in phase signal back into the base input from
the collector’s output. This back in phase signal creates an “oscillator”. The
Common Collector (CC) amplifier is emitter follower amplifier. The CC
amplifier has the input signal inserted into the base and output signal from the
emitter. The CC amplifier has current and power gain, voltage gain less than one.
CC amplifier’s common use buffer or active impedance matching circuit. The CC
amplifier has high input impedance and low output impedance. There is no phase
inversion between CC amplifier’s input and output. When an amplifier’s output
impedance matches the load impedance maximum power is transferred to the
load and all reflections are eliminated. When an amplifier’s output impedance
unmatched the load impedance there are reflections and less than maximum
power is transferred to the load. There are instabilities behaviors in these three
types of amplifiers causes by circuit micro-strip delays in time parasitic effects.
We use RF matching network which able and facilitate impedance matching and
filtering of signal, coupling between RF stages. There are typical amplifiers
matching networks: L matching network, T matching network, and PI matching
network. In design of microwave matching network, device parasitic effects of
length on RF circuit matching and stability. Many RF circuits contain Bias-T
three ports network. The function of the Bias-T is to simultaneously allow a DC
bias voltage and RF test signal to be applied to the port of a transistor during
measurement and operation. Bias-T three ports network suffers from instability
under delayed micro-strip in time. The passive filter with Bias-T suffers from
instability under parameters variation. Many RF circuits include a PIN diode.
A PIN diode is a diode with a wide, lightly doped ‘near’ intrinsic semiconductor
region between a p-type semiconductor and a n-type semiconductor region.
A PIN diode suitable for many applications: Attenuators, fast switches, photo
detectors, and high voltage power electronics applications. A PIN diode operates
under high level injection. The PIN diode suffers from instability under param-
eters variations.
Amplifier can be categorized in two manner, first according to signal level (small
signal amplifier, power/large signal amplifier) and second according to DC biasing
scheme of the active component (Classes A, B, AB, C). There are also other classes,
such as class D (D stands for digital), class E and class F. These all uses the
transistor/FET as a switch [24–26]. Input and output voltage relation of the
P3
amplifier can be modeled simply as: Vout ðtÞ ¼ ak vkin þ H:O:T; Vout ðtÞ ¼
k¼1
a1 vi ðtÞ þ a2 v2i ðtÞ þ a3 v3i ðtÞ þ H:O:T. The general block diagram is described
below (Fig. 4.1):
If we compare small signal versus Large-signal operation amplifier output
voltage expression: Large signal Vout ðtÞ ¼ a1 vi ðtÞ þ a2 v2i ðtÞ þ a3 v3i ðtÞ þ
P3
H:O:T;Vout ðtÞ ¼ ak vkin þ H:O:T. We get usually non-sinusoidal waveform
k¼1
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 407
amplifier output signal. Small signal, output voltage expression is linear Vout ðtÞ ’
a1 vi ðtÞ and the output signal is sinusoidal waveform. All amplifiers are inherently
nonlinear. However when the input signal is small, the input and output relationship
of the amplifier is approximately linear.
Vout ðtÞ ¼ a1 vi ðtÞ þ a2 v2i ðtÞ þ a3 v3i ðtÞ þ H:O:T a1 vi ðtÞ. When vi ðtÞ ! e
ð\2:6 mVÞ Then Vout ðtÞ a1 vi ðtÞ (Fig. 4.2).
The active component can be BJT transistor (Fig. 4.3):
The linear relationship applies also to current and power. An amplifier that
fulfills these conditions: Small signal operation and linearity is called Small Signal
Amplifier (SSA). If a SSA amplifier contains BJT and FET, these components can
Fig. 4.3 Small Signal (SS) amplifier BJT transistor active component
be replaced by their respective small signal model, for instance the Hybrid Pi model
of BJT. To determine the performance of an amplifier, the following characteristics
are typically observed: power gain, bandwidth (operation frequency range), noise
figure, phase response, gain compression, dynamic range, harmonic distortion,
intermodulation distortion and Third Order Intercept point (TOI). The character-
istics which are important to small signal amplifier are bandwidth, noise figure, and
phase response. The important parameters of Large-signal amplifier (Related to
linearity) are gain compression, dynamic range, harmonic distortion, intermodula-
tion distortion, and Third Order Intercept point (TOI).
Typical RF amplifier schematics (Fig. 4.4):
Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions, the BJT can be replaced with linear
Hybrid Pi model (Fig. 4.5).
At low frequencies it is assumed that the transistor responds instantly to charges
of input voltage or current but actually because the mechanism of the transport of
charge carriers from emitter to collector is one of diffusion. The transistor behavior at
high frequencies is inspected by examine this diffusion mechanism in more details.
The Hybrid Pi model gives a reasonable compromise between accuracy and sim-
plicity. Using this model, a detailed analysis of a single stage CE transistor amplifier
is made. The Common Emitter (CE) is the most important practical configuration.
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 409
The CE model is valid at high frequencies. The circuit called the Hybrid Pi,
Giacoletto or model. The analyses of circuits using this model are not too difficult
and give results which are excellent with experiment at all frequencies for which the
410 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
be amplified by similar amount and implies that all frequency components will be
delayed by similar amount. Essence of Small Signal Amplifier (SSA) design: In
essence, designing a small signal amplifier with transistor or Monolithic Microwave
Integrated Circuit (MMIC) implies finding the suitable load and source impedance
to be connected to the output and input port, and getting the required transducer
power gain GT, bandwidth and other characteristics. An amplifier is a circuit
designed to enlarged electrical signals. When there is no input, there should be no
output; this condition is known as stable. On the contrary, if the amplifier produces
an output when there is no input, it is unstable. In fact the amplifier becomes an
oscillator. Thus a stability analysis is required to determine whether an amplifier
circuit is stable or not. Stability analysis is also carried out by assuming a
small-signal amplifier, since the initial signal that causes oscillation is always very
small. Stability of an amplifier is affected by the load and source impedance con-
nected to its two ports. An unstable or marginally stable amplifier can be made
more stable. When amplifier is unstable, or stable region is too small there are some
steps which need to be done: use negative feedback to reduce amplifier gain,
redesign DC biasing, finding new operating point (or Q point) that will result in
more stable amplifier, add some resistive loss to the circuit to improve stability, and
use a new component with better stability.
When an amplifier’s output impedance matches the load impedance, maximum
power is transferred to the load. When amplifier’s output impedance matches the
load impedance all reflections are eliminated. When an amplifier’s output impe-
dance unmatched the load impedance there are reflections and less than maximum
power is transferred to the load. In order to develop maximum power the Zout of the
amplifier must be complex conjugate of the Zin of the load. Amplifier matching
allows to amplifier maximum power transfer and attenuation of harmonics to be
achieved between stages. RF matching network able to facilitates impedance
matching, filtering of signal and coupling between RF stages. The amplifier
matching networks types are L matching network, T matching network, and PI
matching network.
L matchingnetwork: LC matching topology is especially for narrowband impe-
dance matching. L network name is due to its L shape. L network can furnish low
pass filtering to decrease harmonic output. Two stages (amplifier, load) are con-
structed with simple low pass L network between stages. Low pass L network can
matches a higher output impedance source (Zhigh) to a lower input impedance load
(Zlow). Low pass L network can matches a lower output impedance source (Zlow) to
a higher input impedance load (Zhigh). We need to analyze the stability of typical
RF amplifier under RF and small signal conditions, the BJT can be replaced with
linear Hybrid Pi model and additional input and output matching circuits. We define
Xs(t) as the RF source and Rs RF source parasitic resistance (Fig. 4.6).
412 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
Fig. 4.6 Amplifier Hybrid Pi model and additional input and output matching circuits
dVA11 dIL
I C2 ¼ C 2 ; VA11 VA12 ¼ L4 4 ; VA12 ¼ Vout ; IL4 ¼ IRload ;
dt dt
Vout VA12
IRload ¼ ¼
Rload Rload
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 413
Table 4.1 Amplifier Hybrid Pi model and matching circuit Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) for all
nodes
Node KCL @ Ai Node KCL @ Ai
number number
A1 IRs ¼ IL1 þ IC1 A8 ICe þ IRbpe þ gm Vpi þ IRce ¼ ILeplg
A2 IL1 ¼ ICc1 A9 IRb1 ¼ IRc þ ILc
A3 ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILbplg þ IL3 A10 ILc þ ILcplg ¼ ICc2
A4 IL3 ¼ IRb2 A11 ICc2 ¼ IL4 þ IC2
A5 ILbplg ¼ IRbbp A12 IL4 ¼ IRload
A6 IRbbp ¼ IRbpc þ ICc þ IRbpe þ ICe A13 IL2 ¼ IRb1
A7 ICc þ IRbpc ¼ gm Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg
We can write our circuit Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) for all nodes (Table 4.1):
Xs ðtÞ VA1
IRs ¼ ) IRs Rs ¼ Xs ðtÞ VA1 ) VA1 ¼ Xs ðtÞ IRs Rs
Rs
dVA1 dXs ðtÞ dIRs dIL
I C1 ¼ C1 ¼ C1 Rs ; VA1 VA2 ¼ L1 1 ) VA2
dt dt dt dt
dIL1
¼ VA1 L1
dt
dIL1 dVA2 dVA3
VA2 ¼ Xs ðtÞ IRs Rs L1 ; ICC1 ¼ CC1
dt dt dt
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dVA3
¼ CC1 Rs L1 2
dt dt dt dt
VA4 dIL
IRb2 ¼ ) VA4 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 ; VA3 VA4 ¼ L3 3 ) VA3
Rb2 dt
dIL3 dVA3 dIRb2 d 2 IL
¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 ; ¼ Rb2 þ L3 2 3
dt dt dt dt
dXs ðtÞ d 2 IL 1 dIRb2 d 2 IL 3
System equation No. 1: ICC1 ¼ CC1 dt dIdtRs Rs L1 dt2 dt Rb2 L3 dt2
VA13 VA9
IRb1 ¼ ) IRb1 Rb1 ¼ VA13 VA9 ) VA9 ¼ VA13 IRb1 Rb1
Rb1
dIL3 dIL
VA9 ¼ VA13 IRb1 Rb1 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 L2 2 IRb1 Rb1
dt dt
414 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
dILcplg dIL
VA7 VA10 ¼ Lcplg ) VA10 ¼ VA7 Lcplg cplg
dt dt
dIL dIL
VA10 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp IRbpe Rbpe þ IRce Rce
dt dt
dILcplg
Lcplg
dt
dLLc dLLc dVA10 ICc2 IC
VA9 VA10 ¼ Lc ) VA9 ¼ VA10 þ Lc ; ¼ þ 2
dt dt dt Cc2 C2
dIL dIL
VA9 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp IRbpe Rbpe þ IRce Rce
dt dt
dIL dLLc
Lcplg cplg þ Lc
dt dt
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 415
dðVA10 VA11 Þ dVA10 dVA11
ICc2 ¼ Cc2 ) ICc2 ¼ Cc2 ) ICc2
dt dt dt
dVA10 IC2
¼ Cc2
dt C2
Since ICc2 ¼ IL4 þ IC2 ¼ IRload þ IC2 ) IC2 ¼ ICc2 IRload then
416 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dIRb2 d 2 I L3
ICC1 ¼ CC1 Rs L1 2 Rb2 L3 2
dt dt dt dt dt
IL3 ¼ IRb2 ; IL1 ¼ ICc1 ; ICc2 ¼ IL4 þ IC2 ) IC2 ¼ ICc2 IRload
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIR d 2 IL
IL1 ¼ CC1 Rs L1 2 1 b2 Rb2 L3 2 3
dt dt dt dt dt
We need to find our system equilibrium points (fixed points). It is done by setting
dIRs dIRb2 dIL1 d 2 IL1 dIL3 d 2 IL3
dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0) dt2 ¼ 0; dt ¼0) dt2 ¼ 0; dIdtRce ¼ 0
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 417
E ðIL1 ; IC c2 ; IRload ; IRce ; IC 2 ; IC 1 ; IRs ; IL2 ; ILbplg ; IL3 Þ
¼ ð0; IRload ; IRload ; IRce ; 0; IRs ; IRs ; ðILbplg þ IL3 Þ; ILbplg ; IL3 Þ
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the equi-
librium points of the Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network consists in
adding to coordinate [IL1 ; ICc2 ; IRload ; IRce ; IC2 ; IC1 ; IRs ; IL2 ; ILbplg ; IL3 ] arbitrarily small
increments of exponentially form ½iL1 ; iCc2 ; iRload ; iRce ; iC2 ; iC1 ; iRs ; iL2 ; iLbplg ; iL3 ekt
and retaining the first order terms in
IL1 ; ICc2 ; IRload ; IRce ; IC2 ; IC1 ; IRs ; IL2 ; ILbplg ; IL3 . The system of homogenous equations
leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The polynomial
characteristic equations accept by set of the below circuit variables, circuit variables
derivative and circuit variables second order derivative with respect to time into
Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network equivalent circuit [2–4]. Our
Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network equivalent circuit fixed values
with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½iL1 ; iCc2 ; iRload ; iRce ; iC2 ; iC1 ;
iRs ; iL2 ; iLbplg ; iL3 ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2
(third fixed point), etc.,
dIL1 d 2 IL1 dIL3 d 2 IL3
We define new variables: Y1 ¼ dt ) dYdt1 ¼ dt2 ; Y2 ¼ dt ) dYdt2 ¼ dt2
418 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
dIRload dY3 d 2 IRload dY3
Y3 ¼ ) ¼ ; ICc2 IRload ¼ C2 Y3 Rload þ L4
dt dt dt2 dt
dXs ðtÞ dIRs dY1 dIRb2 dY2
I L 1 ¼ C C1 !e Rs L1 Rb2 L3
dt dt dt dt dt
dILeplg
j ðjÞ ) iLeplg k ekt ¼ y5 ekt ; iLeplg k þ y5 ¼ 0
dt Y5 ¼0
dIL3
iL1 k þ y1 ¼ 0; Y2 ¼ j ðjÞ ) y2 ekt ¼ iL3 k ekt ; iL3 k þ y2 ¼ 0
dt Y2 ¼0
4.1 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers … 419
dIRload
Y3 ¼ j ðjÞ ) y3 ekt ¼ iRload k ekt ; iRload k þ y3 ¼ 0
dt Y3 ¼0
dY3
ICc2 IRload ¼ C2 Y3 Rload þ L4
dt
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
ICc2 þ iCc2 ekt IRload iRload ekt ¼ C2 ðY3 þ y3 ekt Þ Rload þ L4 y3 k ekt Þ
ðjÞ
@ fixed point IL1 ¼ 0; iL1 ¼ CC1 ðiRs Rs L1 y1 iRb2 Rb2 L3 y2 Þ k
1 1 IR dIR d 2 ILcplg d 2 ILeplg
ICc2 þ load ce Rce þ Lcplg ¼ L eplg
Cc2 C2 C2 dt dt2 dt2
1 1 IR dIR dY4 dY5
ICc2 þ load ce Rce þ Lcplg ¼ Leplg
Cc2 C2 C2 dt dt dt
1 1
I
ðjÞ
R þ i R e kt
ðjÞ load
ICc2 þ iCc2 ekt iRCe k ekt Rce
load
þ
Cc2 C2 C2
þ Lcplg y4 k ekt ¼ Leplg y5 k ekt
ðjÞ
ðjÞ IR
@ fixed point ICc2 ðC1c2 þ C2 Þ
1
load
C2 ¼0
420 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
ðjÞ
ðjÞ 1 1 1 1 IR iR
ICc2 ð þ Þ þ iCc2 ð þ Þ ekt load load ekt iRCe k ekt Rce
Cc2 C2 Cc2 C2 C2 C2
kt kt
þ Lcplg y4 k e ¼ Leplg y5 k e
ðjÞ
ðjÞ 1 1 IR 1 1 iR
fICc2 ð þ Þ load g þ iCc2 ð þ Þ ekt load ekt iRCe k ekt Rce
Cc2 C2 C2 Cc2 C2 C2
kt kt
þ Lcplg y4 k e ¼ Leplg y5 k e
1 1 iR
iCc2 þ ekt load ekt iRCe k ekt Rce þ Lcplg y4 k ekt
Cc2 C2 C2
¼ Leplg y5 k ekt
1 1 iR
iCc2 ð þ Þ load iRCe k Rce þ Lcplg y4 k ¼ Leplg y5 k
Cc2 C2 C2
Rload 1 1
y3 k y3 þ iCc2 iRload
L4 C2 L4 C2 L4
1
¼ 0; z1 k iL1 ¼0
CC1 ðRs þ L1 þ Rb2 þ L3 Þ
Cc2 þ C2
1 1
iRload
z2 k þ iCc2 ¼0
ðRce Lcplg þ Leplg Þ C2 ðRce Lcplg þ Leplg Þ
i11 ¼ k; i12 ¼ . . . ¼ i17 ¼ 0; i18 ¼ 1; i21 ¼ 0; i22 ¼ k; i23 ¼ . . . ¼ i27 ¼ 0; i28 ¼ 1
i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k; i34 ¼ i35 ¼ i36 ¼ 0; i37 ¼ 1; i38 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ i42 ¼ i43 ¼ 0;
i44 ¼ k
i45 ¼ i46 ¼ 0; i47 ¼ 1; i48 ¼ 0; i51 ¼ . . . ¼ i54 ¼ 0; i55 ¼ k; i56 ¼ 1; i57 ¼ i58 ¼ 0
1 Rload
i61 ¼ . . . ¼ i64 ¼ 0; i65 ¼ ; i66 ¼ k ; i67 ¼ i68 ¼ 0
C2 L4 L4
1
i71 ¼ i72 ¼ 0; i73 ¼ ; i74 ¼ i75 ¼ i76 ¼ 0; i77 ¼ k; i78 ¼ 0
CC1 ðRs þ L1 þ Rb2 þ L3 Þ
1
i81 ¼ . . . ¼ i84 ¼ 0; i85 ¼ ; i86 ¼ i87 ¼ 0; i88 ¼ k
C2 ðRce Lcplg þ Leplg Þ
422 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
0 1
0 1 iLcplg
0 B C
B0 C B iLeplg C
B C B C
B0 C 0 1 B C
B C B i L1 C
B0 C i11 . . . i18 B C
B C .. C B i L3 C
We consider B C ! eB .
@ ..
.. B C0
B01 C . . AB C
B C B iRload C
B C2 L4 C i81 i88 B C
B0 C B y3 C
B C B C
@ þ C1 A B C
@ z1 A
1
Cc2 2
ðRce Lcplg þ Leplg Þ
z2
0 1 0 1
i11 . . . i18 i11 ... i18
B .. .. .. C B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A ; det(A k IÞ ¼ 0 ) det@ . . . A¼0
i81 i88 i81 i88
In (4.1) we discuss the stability and fixed points (equilibrium points) analysis of
Small Signal (SS) amplifiers with input and output L-matching network. Another
way is to use Small Signal (SS) amplifier with input and output PI & T’s matching
networks. The PI or T matching networks constructed from three elements impe-
dance matching and are used in many narrow band applications. The narrow band is
due to the higher loaded Q over what the L network possesses. PI and T networks
also permit any Q to be selected and always PI and T Q’s (loaded quality factor) is
bigger or equal to the L network Q’s.
The Qis desired for a particular applications
and is calculated with the formula Q ¼ f2 f
fc
1
when utilizing with high Q inductor.
Q is the loaded quality factor of the matching circuit. fc is the center frequency of
the circuit. f2 is the upper frequency and need to pass with little loss. f1 is the lower
frequency and need to pass with little loss. We consider PI network as a two L
networks which attached back to back. Any PI network can be transformed to an
equivalent T network. This is also known as the Wye-Delta transformation, which
is the terminology used in power distribution and electrical engineering. The PI
matching network is equivalent to the Delta and the T matching network is
equivalent to the Wye (or star) form [25, 26, 33]. The typical RF amplifier sche-
matic with input and output matching circuit is as follow (Fig. 4.7):
4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s … 423
Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions, the BJT can be replaced with linear
Hybrid PI model (Fig. 4.8):
Fig. 4.8 Small Signal (SS) amplifier Hybrid PI model with PI matching networks
424 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
Fig. 4.9 Linear Hybrid PI model and additional input and output matching circuits
Table 4.2 Linear Hybrid PI model and additional matching circuits Kirchhoff’s Current Law
(KCL) for all nodes
Node KCL @ Ai Node KCL @ Ai
number number
A1 IRs ¼ ILa þ ICa1 A8 ICe þ IRbpe þ gm Vpi þ IRce ¼ ILeplg
A2 ILa ¼ ICa2 þ ICC1 A9 IRb1 ¼ IRc þ ILc
A3 ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILbplg þ IL3 A10 ILc þ ILcplg ¼ ICc2
A4 IL3 ¼ IRb2 A11 ICc2 ¼ ILb þ ICb1
A5 ILbplg ¼ IRbbp A12 ILb ¼ ICb2 þ IRload
A6 IRbbp ¼ IRbpc þ ICc þ IRbpe þ ICe A13 IL2 ¼ IRb1
A7 ICc þ IRbpc ¼ gm Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg
We can write our circuit Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL) for all nodes:
Xs ðtÞ VA1
IRs ¼ ) IRs Rs ¼ Xs ðtÞ VA1 ) VA1 ¼ Xs ðtÞ IRs Rs
Rs
dVA1 d dXs ðtÞ dIR
ICa1 ¼ Ca1 ¼ Ca1 ðXs ðtÞ IRs Rs Þ ¼ Ca1 Ca1 Rs s
dt dt dt dt
dILa dILa dIL
VLa ¼VA1 VA2 ¼ La ) VA2 ¼ VA1 La ¼ Xs ðtÞ IRs Rs La a
dt dt dt
dVA2 d dILa
ICa2 ¼ Ca2 ¼ Ca2 ðXs ðtÞ IRs Rs La Þ
dt dt dt
dXs ðtÞ dIR d 2 IL
¼ Ca2 Ca2 Rs s Ca2 La 2 a
dt dt dt
d dVA2 dVA3
ICC1 ¼ CC1 ðVA2 VA3 Þ ¼ CC1 C C1
dt dt dt
d dILa dVA3
¼ CC1 ðXs ðtÞ IRs Rs La Þ C C1
dt dt dt
d dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL
ICC1 ¼ CC1 ðVA2 VA3 Þ ¼ CC1 CC1 Rs CC1 La 2 a
dt dt dt dt
dVA3
CC1
dt
d
ICC1 ¼ CC1 ðVA2 VA3 Þ
dt
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL dIR
¼ CC1 CC1 Rs CC1 La 2 a CC1 ð b2 Rb2 þ L3
dt dt dt dt
d 2 I L3
2 Þ
dt
VA13 VA9
IRb1 ¼ ) IRb1 Rb1 ¼ VA13 VA9 ) VA9 ¼ VA13 IRb1 Rb1
Rb1
dIL3 dIL
VA9 ¼ VA13 IRb1 Rb1 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 L2 2 IRb1 Rb1
dt dt
dILbplg dIL dIL
VA3 VA5 ¼ Lbplg ) VA5 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 3 Lbplg bplg
dt dt dt
VA5 VA6
IRbbp ¼ ) IRbbp Rbbp ¼ VA5 VA6 ) VA6
Rbbp
dIL dIL
¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp
dt dt
VA9 VA VA8
IRc ¼ ) VA9 ¼ IRc Rc ; IRbpe ¼ 6 ) IRbpe Rbpe
Rc Rbpe
¼ VA6 VA8 ) VA8 ¼ VA6 IRbpe Rbpe
dIL3 dIL
VA8 ¼ VA6 IRbpe Rbpe ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp
dt dt
IRbpe Rbpe
dIL3 dIL
VA7 ¼VA8 þ IRce Rce ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp IRbpe
dt dt
Rbpe þ IRce Rce
dILcplg dIL
VA7 VA10 ¼ Lcplg ) VA10 ¼ VA7 Lcplg cplg
dt dt
dIL dIL
VA10 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp IRbpe Rbpe þ IRce Rce
dt dt
dILcplg
Lcplg
dt
dLLc dLLc dVA10 ICc2 IC
VA9 VA10 ¼ Lc ) VA9 ¼ VA10 þ Lc ; ¼ þ b1
dt dt dt Cc2 Cb1
dIL dIL
VA9 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp IRbpe Rbpe þ IRce Rce
dt dt
dILcplg dLLc
Lcplg þ Lc
dt dt
dðVA10 VA11 Þ dVA10 dVA11
ICc2 ¼ Cc2 ) ICc2 ¼ Cc2 ) ICc2
dt dt dt
dVA10 ICb1
¼ Cc2
dt Cb1
dILb dIL VA
VA11 VA12 ¼ Lb ) VA11 ¼ VA12 þ Lb b ; IRload ¼ 12 ) VA12
dt dt Rload
¼ IRload Rload
Since
ICc2 ¼ ILb þ ICb1 ) ICb1 ¼ ICc2 ILb ; ILb ¼ ICb2 þ IRload ; ICb1 ¼ ICc2 ICb2 IRload
Based on the above assumption, we get the following system fixed points:
1 1 ILb 1 1
IC C ¼ 0; IC c2 þ
¼ 0 ) ILb ¼ ICc2 þ Cb1 ; ILb
1 Cc2 Cb1 Cb1 Cc2 Cb1
¼ IRload
E IC C ; IRs ; ILa ; IRb2 ; IL3 ; IC c2 ; ILb ; ILeplg ; IRce ; ILcplg ; IRload
1
1 1
¼ 0; IRs ; ILa ; IRb2 ; IL3 ; IC c2 ; IC c2 þ Cb1 ; ILeplg ; IRce ; ILcplg ; IC c2
C c2 C b1
C1c2 þ 1
Cb1 Cb1
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the Smallh Signal (SS) amplifier with matching networki
consists in adding to coordinate ICC1 ; IRs ; ILa ; IRb2 ; IL3 ; ICc2 ; ILb ; ILeplg ; IRce ; ILcplg ; IRload
arbitrarily small increments of exponentially form ½iCC1 ; iRs ; iLa ; iRb2 ; iL3 ;
iCc2 ; iLb ; iLeplg ; iRce ; iLcplg ; iRload ekt and retaining the first order terms in
ICC1 ; IRs ; ILa ; IRb2 ; IL3 ; ICc2 ; ILb ; ILeplg ; IRce ; ILcplg ; IRload [3, 4]. The system of homogenous
equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The
polynomial characteristic equations accept by set of the below circuit variables,
circuit variables derivative and circuit variables second order derivative with respect
to time into Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network equivalent circuit.
Our Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network equivalent circuit fixed
values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½iCC1 ; iRs ; iLa ; iRb2 ; iL3 ;
iCc2 ; iLb ; iLeplg ; iRce ; iLcplg ; iRload ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed
point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
2 dIL3 d 2 IL3
We define new variables: Y1 ¼ dIdtLa ) dYdt1 ¼ ddtI2La ; Y2 ¼ dt ) dYdt2 ¼ dt2
dXs ðtÞ dIR dY1 dIRb2 dY2
ICC1 ¼ CC1 ! e s CC1 Rs CC1 La CC1 Rb2 CC1 L3
dt dt dt dt dt
2 2
dIL dY3 d ILeplg dIL dY4 d ILcplg
Y3 ¼ eplg ) ¼ ; Y4 ¼ cplg ) ¼
dt dt dt2 dt dt dt2
1 1 I Lb dY3 dIRce dY4
ICc2 þ ¼ Leplg þ Rce Lcplg
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1 dt dt dt
4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s … 431
dILcplg
y3 iLeplg k ¼ 0; Y4 ¼ j ðjÞ ) y4 ekt ¼ iLcplg k ekt ;
dt Y4 ¼0
dXs ðtÞ
y4 iLcplg k ¼ 0; !e¼0
dt
dIRs dY1 dIRb2 dY2
I CC 1 ¼ CC1 Rs CC1 La CC1 Rb2 CC1 L3
dt dt dt dt
ðjÞ
ICc1 þ iCc1 ekt ¼ iRs k ekt CC1 Rs CC1 La y1 k ekt iRb2 k ekt CC1
Rb2 CC1 L3 y2 k ekt
ðjÞ
@ fixed point ICc1 ¼ 0 ; iCc1 ¼ ðiRs Rs þ La y1 þ iRb2 Rb2 þ L3 y2 Þ CC1 k
We divide the two side of the above equation by iCc1 term
1 1
I
ðjÞ
Lb þ i L e kt
ðjÞ b
ICc2 þ iCc2 ekt þ
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1
¼ Leplg y3 k ekt þ iRce k ekt Rce Lcplg y4 k ekt
I
@ fixed point IC c2 1
Cc2 þ 1
Cb1 CLb1b ¼ 0 ) ILb ¼ IC c2 1
Cc2 þ 1
Cb1 Cb1
( ðjÞ
)
ðjÞ 1 1 IL 1 1 iLb ekt
ICc2 þ b þ iCc2 þ ekt
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1 Cc2 Cb1 Cb1
¼ Leplg y3 k ekt þ iRce k ekt Rce Lcplg y4 k ekt
1 1 iL ekt
iCc2 þ ekt b ¼ Leplg y3 k ekt þ iRce k ekt Rce Lcplg
Cc2 Cb1 Cb1
y4 k ekt
dIRload ðjÞ
ILb ¼ Cb2 Rload þ IRload ) ILb þ iLb ekt
dt
ðjÞ
¼ Cb2 Rload iRload k ekt þ IRload þ iRload ekt
¼0
Cb2 Rload iRload k ekt ¼ iLb ekt iRload ekt ) iLb iRload Cb2 Rload iRload k
¼0
We can summery our Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching network (PI
input and output matching networks) small increments elements:
4.2 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers PI & T’s … 433
1
iCc1 z1 k ¼ 0
ðCC1 Rs þ CC1 La þ CC1 Rb2 þ CC1 L3 Þ
1
Cc2 þ 1
Cb1 i Lb
iCc2 z2 k ¼ 0
ðLeplg þ Rce Lcplg Þ Cb1 ðLeplg þ Rce Lcplg Þ
i11 ¼ k; i12 ¼ i13 ¼ i14 ¼ 0; i15 ¼ 1; i16 ¼ i17 ¼ 0; i21 ¼ 0; i22 ¼ k;
i23 ¼ i24 ¼ 0; i25 ¼ 1; i26 ¼ i27 ¼ 0
i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k; i34 ¼ i35 ¼ 0; i36 ¼ 1; i37 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ i42 ¼ i43 ¼ 0
i44 ¼ k; i45 ¼ 0; i46 ¼ 1; i47 ¼ 0; i51 ¼ . . . ¼ i54 ¼ 0; i55 ¼ k; i56 ¼ i57 ¼ 0
1
i61 ¼ i65 ¼ 0; i66 ¼ k; i67 ¼ 0; i71 ¼ . . . ¼ i76 ¼ 0; i77 ¼ k
Cb2 Rload
u11 ¼ u12 ¼ u13 ¼ 0; u21 ¼ u22 ¼ u23 ¼ 0; u31 ¼ u32 ¼ u33 ¼ 0; u41 ¼ u42
¼ u43 ¼ 0
1
u51 ¼ ; u ¼ u53 ¼ 0
ðCC1 Rs þ CC1 La þ CC1 Rb2 þ CC1 L3 Þ 52
ðC1c2 þ Cb1 Þ
1
1
u61 ¼ 0; u62 ¼ ; u63 ¼
ðLeplg þ Rce Lcplg Þ Cb1 ðLeplg þ Rce Lcplg Þ
1
u71 ¼ u72 ¼ 0; u73 ¼
Cb2 Rload
0 1
i La
B i C
B L3 C
0 1 0 1 B C
u11 ... u13 i11 . . . i17 B iLeplg C
B C
B .. .. .. C ! e; B .. .. . C B C
We consider @ . . . A @ . . .. A B
B
iLcplg C 0
C
u71 u73 i71 i77 B z C
B 1C
B C
@ z2 A
iRload
0 1 0 1
i11 ... i17 i11 . . . i17
B .. .. .. C B .. .. . C
AkI ¼@ . . . A; detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 ) det@ . . .. A ¼ 0
i71 i77 i71 i77
In our stability analysis of Small Signal (SS) amplifiers which include input and
output matching networks, we need to consider the microstrip lines that connect our
input RF source to input matching network and input matching network to Small
Signal (SS) amplifier. Additionally there is a microstrip lines between Small Signal
(SS) amplifier to the output matching network and between output matching net-
work to the load (Rload). We represent in our stability analysis the microstrip lines
as a parasitic delay lines in time. We define our microstrip line’s delay parameters
as s1, s2, s3, s4 respectively. Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions, the BJT
can be replaced with linear Hybrid PI model, input and output matching circuits, RF
input source, load resistance and microstrip delay lines. The amplifier matching
networks types are L matching network in our analysis [25, 26, 33] (Fig. 4.10).
Remark: microstrip lines have many parasitic effects. We neglect all those effects
and concentrate on representation of microstrip line as a delay line. We consider
that the voltage on microstrip delay line is very small and the assumption that the
current flow through each microstrip is delay in time.
If we define the voltage on (i) delay line as Vsi (i = 1, 2, 3…). Vsi ! e . If we
define the current that flow through microstrip as a IðtÞ then the effect of parasitic
delay in time is Iðt si Þ.IðtÞ ! Iðt si Þ. We consider the following:
Tau1 = s1, Tau2 = s2, Tau3 = s3, Tau4 = s4, Vs1 ¼ ðVA11 VA12 Þ ! e;
Vs2 ¼ ðVA21 VA22 Þ ! e
Fig. 4.10 Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching networks (Hybrid PI equivalent circuit for
BJT transistor)
436 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
We can write our circuit Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL) for all nodes:
Table 4.3 Small Signal (SS) amplifier with matching networks circuit Kirchhoff’s Current Law
(KCL) for all nodes
Node number KCL @ Ai Node number KCL @ Ai
A1 IRs ðt s1 Þ ¼ IL1 ðtÞ þ IC1 ðtÞ A8 ICe þ IRbpe þ gm Vpi þ IRce ¼ ILeplg
(A1 = A1-1 = A1-2)
A2 IL1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ ICc1 ðtÞ A9 IRb1 ¼ IRc þ ILc
(A2 = A2-1 = A2-2)
A3 ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILbplg þ IL3 A10 ILc þ ILcplg ¼ ICc2
A4 IL3 ¼ IRb2 A11 ICc2 ðt s3 Þ ¼ IL4 ðtÞ þ IC2 ðtÞ
(A11 = A11-1 = A11-2)
A5 ILbplg ¼ IRbbp A12 IL4 ðt s4 Þ ¼ IRload ðtÞ
(A12 = A12-1 = A12-2)
A6 IRbbp ¼ IRbpc þ ICc þ IRbpe þ ICe A13 IL2 ¼ IRb1
A7 ICc þ IRbpc ¼ gm Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 437
Xs ðtÞ VA1
IRs ¼ ) IRs Rs ¼ Xs ðtÞ VA1 ) VA1 ¼ Xs ðtÞ IRs Rs
Rs
dVA1 dXs ðtÞ dIRs
IC1 ¼ C1 ¼ C1 ð Rs Þ; VA1 VA2
dt dt dt
dIL dIL
¼ L1 1 ) VA2 ¼ VA1 L1 1
dt dt
dIL1 dVA2 dVA3
VA2 ¼ Xs ðtÞ IRs Rs L1 ; ICC1 ¼ CC1
dt dt dt
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dVA3
¼ CC1 Rs L1 2
dt dt dt dt
VA4 dIL
IRb2 ¼ ) VA4 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 ; VA3 VA4 ¼ L3 3 ) VA3
Rb2 dt
dIL3 dVA3 dIRb2 d 2 IL
¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 ; ¼ Rb2 þ L3 2 3
dt dt dt dt
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dIRb2 d 2 IL
I CC 1 ¼ CC1 ð Rs L1 2 Rb2 L3 2 3 Þ
dt dt dt dt dt
IL1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ ICc1 ðtÞ; IL1 ðtÞ¼IRs ðt s1 Þ IC1 ðtÞ; ICc1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 ðt s2 Þ
¼ IRs ðt s1 s2 Þ IC1 ðt s2 Þ
P
2
ICc1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ IRs ðt si Þ IC1 ðt s2 Þ System equation No. 1:
i¼1
!
X
2
IRs t si IC1 ðt s2 Þ
i¼1
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dIRb2 d 2 I L3
¼ CC1 Rs L1 2 Rb2 L3 2
dt dt dt dt dt
VA13 VA9
IRb1 ¼ ) IRb1 Rb1 ¼ VA13 VA9 ) VA9 ¼ VA13 IRb1 Rb1
Rb1
dIL3 dIL
VA9 ¼ VA13 IRb1 Rb1 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 L2 2 IRb1 Rb1
dt dt
dILbplg dIL dIL
VA3 VA5 ¼ Lbplg ) VA5 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 3 Lbplg bplg
dt dt dt
438 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
VA5 VA6
IRbbp ¼ ) IRbbp Rbbp ¼ VA5 VA6 ) VA6
Rbbp
dIL dIL
¼ IRb 2 Rb2 þ L3 3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp
dt dt
VA9 VA VA8
IRc ¼ ) VA9 ¼ IRc Rc ; IRbpe ¼ 6 ) IRbpe Rbpe
Rc Rbpe
¼ VA6 VA8 ) VA8 ¼ VA6 IRbpe Rbpe
dIL3 dIL
VA8 ¼ VA6 IRbpe Rbpe ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp
dt dt
IRbpe Rbpe
dIL3 dIL
VA7 ¼VA8 þ IRce Rce ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp IRbpe
dt dt
Rbpe þ IRce Rce
dILcplg dIL
VA7 VA10 ¼ Lcplg ) VA10 ¼ VA7 Lcplg cplg
dt dt
dIL dIL
VA10 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp IRbpe Rbpe þ IRce Rce
dt dt
dILcplg
Lcplg
dt
dLLc dLLc dVA10 ICc2 IC
VA9 VA10 ¼ Lc ) VA9 ¼ VA10 þ Lc ; ¼ þ 2
dt dt dt Cc2 C2
dIL dIL
VA9 ¼ IRb2 Rb2 þ L3 3 Lbplg bplg IRbbp Rbbp IRbpe Rbpe þ IRce Rce
dt dt
dILcplg dLLc
Lcplg þ Lc
dt dt
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 439
ICc2 ðt s3 Þ ¼ IL4 ðtÞ þ IC2 ðtÞ ) IC2 ðtÞ ¼ ICc2 ðt s3 Þ IL4 ðtÞ
System equation No. 4: IRload ðtÞ ¼ IL4 ðt s4 Þ; IC2 ðtÞ ¼ ICc2 ðt s3 Þ IL4 ðtÞ
dIL4 dIRload d 2 IL
VA11 ¼ IRload Rload þ L4 ; IC2 ¼ C2 Rload þ L4 2 4
dt dt dt
dIL4 ðt s4 Þ d 2 I L4
ICc2 ðt s3 Þ IL4 ðtÞ ¼ C2 Rload þ L4 2
dt dt
We can merge our system two differential equations to one differential equation:
X
2
IRs ðt si Þ IC1 ðt s2 Þ
i¼1
dXs ðtÞ dIRs d 2 IL1 dIRb2 d 2 I L3
¼ CC1 Rs L1 2 Rb2 L3 2
dt dt dt dt dt
To find our equilibrium points (fixed points) of the Small Signal (SS) amplifier
P2
with L—matching networks is by lim IRs t si ¼ IRs ðtÞ;
t!1 i¼1
lim ICc2 ðt s3 Þ ¼ ICc2 ðtÞ
t!1
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 441
X
2
lim IC1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ IC1 ðtÞ; lim IL4 ðt s4 Þ ¼ IL4 ðtÞ; t s2 ; t s4 ; t si ; t s 3
t!1 t!1
i¼1
dIRs dIR dIR dIL ðt s4 Þ dIL d 2 IL
¼ 0; b2 ¼ 0; ce ¼ 0; 4 ¼ 0; 1 ¼ 0 ) 2 1 ¼ 0
dt dt dt dt dt dt
dIL3 d 2 I L3 dILeplg d 2 ILeplg dILcplg d 2 ILcplg
¼ 0 ) 2 ¼ 0; ¼0) ¼ 0; ) ¼0
dt dt dt dt2 dt dt2
dIL4 d 2 IL dXs ðtÞ 1 1 I
¼ 0 ) 2 4 ¼ 0; IRs IC 1 ¼ CC1 ; ICc2 ð þ Þ L4 ¼ 0
dt dt dt Cc2 C2 C2
dX ðtÞ
IC c2 IL4 ¼ 0 ) IC c2 ¼ IL4 ;
s
!e
dt
ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILbplg þ IL3 ¼ IL2 þ IRbbp þ IL3 ¼ IL2 þ ðIRbpc þ ICc Þ þ IRbpe þ ICe þ IL3
ICc þ IRbpc ¼ gm Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg ; ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ðIRbpc þ ICc Þ þ IRbpe þ ICe þ IL3
ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ gm Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg þ IRbpe þ ICe þ IL3 ; ICe þ IRbpe þ gm Vpi þ IRce ¼ ILeplg
ICe þ IRbpe þ gm Vpi ¼ ILeplg IRce ; ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILeplg IRce þ IRce þ ILcplg þ IL3
ICc1 ¼ IL2 þ ILeplg þ ILcplg þ IL3 ; ICc2 ¼ILc þ ILcplg ¼ IRb1 IRc þ ILcplg ;
IRb1 ¼ IRc þ ILc ) ILc ¼ IRb1 IRc
ICc2 ¼ILc þ ILcplg ¼ IRb1 IRc þ ILcplg ¼ IL2 IRc þ ILcplg ; IL2 ¼ICc1 ILbplg IL3
ICc2 ¼ IL2 IRc þ ILcplg ¼ ICc1 ILbplg IL3 IRc þ ILcplg ; ICc1 ðtÞ¼IL1 ðt s2 Þ
ICc2 ¼ IL1 ðt s2 Þ ILbplg IL3 IRc þ ILcplg ; ILbplg ¼IRbbp ¼ IRbpc þ ICc þ IRbpe þ ICe
ILbplg ¼ ðIRbpc þ ICc Þ þ IRbpe þ ICe ; ICc þ IRbpc ¼ gm Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg
ILbplg ¼ ðgm Vpi þ IRce þ ILcplg Þ þ IRbpe þ ICe ; ICe þ IRbpe þ gm Vpi þ IRce ¼ ILeplg
ILbplg ¼ ðgm Vpi þ IRce þ IRbpe þ ICe Þ þ ILcplg ¼ ILeplg þ ILcplg ; ILbplg ¼ ILeplg þ ILcplg
ICc2 ¼ IL1 ðt s2 Þ ILbplg IL3 IRc þ ILcplg ¼ IL1 ðt s2 Þ ILeplg ILcplg
IL3 IRc þ ILcplg
1 1 X3
½IL1 ðt s2 Þ ILeplg IL3 IRc þ ½IL1 ðt si Þ ILeplg ðt s3 Þ IL3 ðt s3 Þ
Cc2 C2 i¼2
IL4 ðtÞ d 2 ILeplg dIRce d 2 ILcplg
IRc ðt s3 Þ ¼ Leplg þ Rce L cplg
C2 dt2 dt dt2
X
3
IL1 ðt si Þ ILeplg ðt s3 Þ IL3 ðt s3 Þ IRc ðt s3 Þ IL4 ðtÞ
i¼2
dIL4 ðt s4 Þ d 2 IL
¼ C2 Rload þ L4 2 4
dt dt
Remark: Some of our system variables include time argument X(t) and other
without time argument. Always consider these system variables as a function of
time.
We consider L13 ¼ L1 L3 ; Lecplg ¼Leplg Lcplg . We define for simplicity of
dIL1 dIL3 d 2 Y2 d 2 IL1 d 2 IL3 dIL3
our analysis new variables: Y1 ¼ dIdtRs ; Y2 ¼ dt þ dt ; dt2 ¼ dt2 þ dt2 ; Y3 ¼ dt .
dIL dILcplg d 2 ILeplg d 2 ILcplg
Y4 ¼ dIdtRce ; Y5 ¼ dteplg dt ; dY5
dt ¼ dt2 dt2 . The system new set of delay
differential equations:
X
2
dXs ðtÞ dY2
IRs ðt si Þ IC1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ CC1 ð Y1 Rs L13 Y3 Rb2 Þ
i¼1
dt dt
1 1 X3
½IL1 ðt s2 Þ ILeplg IL3 IRc þ ½IL1 ðt si Þ ILeplg ðt s3 Þ IL3 ðt s3 Þ
Cc2 C2 i¼2
IL4 ðtÞ dY5
IRc ðt s3 Þ ¼ Lecplg þ Y4 Rce
C2 dt
X
3
IL1 ðt si Þ ILeplg ðt s3 Þ IL3 ðt s3 Þ IRc ðt s3 Þ IL4 ðtÞ
i¼2
dIL4 ðt s4 Þ d 2 IL
¼ C2 ð Rload þ L4 2 4 Þ
dt dt
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 443
dY5 1 1 X3
¼ ½IL1 ðt s2 Þ ILeplg IL3 IRc þ ½IL1 ðt si Þ
dt Cc2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg i¼2
IL4 ðtÞ Rce
ILeplg ðt s3 Þ IL3 ðt s3 Þ IRc ðt s3 Þ Y4
C2 Lecplg Lecplg
We need to find our system equilibrium points (fixed points) based on the new
set of delay differential equations. It is done by setting dYdt2 ¼ 0; dYdt5 ¼ 0; dYdt6 ¼ 0
@ fixed points
P
2 P
2
lim IRs ðt si Þ IRs ðtÞ; lim IL1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ IL1 ðtÞ; t si ; t s2
t!1 i¼1 t!1 i¼1
X
3 X
3
lim IC1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ IC1 ðtÞ; lim IL1 ðt si Þ ¼ IL1 ðtÞ; t si ; lim ILeplg ðt s3 Þ ¼ ILeplg ðtÞ
t!1 t!1 t!1
i¼2 i¼2
X
3 X
3
lim IL3 ðt s3 Þ ¼ IL3 ðtÞ; t s3 ; lim IRc ðt s3 Þ ¼ IRc ðtÞ; lim IL1 ðt si Þ ¼ IL1 ðtÞ; t si
t!1 t!1 t!1
i¼2 i¼2
lim Y6 ðt s4 Þ ¼ Y6 ðtÞ; t s4
t!1
444 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
1 1 1 dXs ðtÞ
I þ I þ ¼ 0;
CC1 L13 Rs CC1 L13 C1 L13 dt
1 1 ½IL1 ILeplg IL3 IRc IL4
ð þ Þ ¼0
Cc2 C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg
1
ðI ILeplg IL3 IRc IL4 Þ ¼ 0; Y1 ¼ 0;
C2 L4 L1
Y2 ¼ 0; Y3 ¼ 0; Y4 ¼ 0; Y5 ¼ 0; Y6 ¼ 0
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the Small Signal
(SS) amplifier with L matching networks
consists in adding to coordinate IRs ; IC1 ; IL1 ; IL3 ; ILeplg ; IRc ; IL4 ; Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Y5 ; Y6
arbitrarily small increments of exponentially form ½iRs ; iC1 ; iL1 ; iL3 ; iLeplg ; iRc ; iL4 ;
y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ; y5 ; y6 ekt and retaining the first order terms in IRs ; IC1 ; IL1 ; IL3 ; ILeplg ;
IRc ; IL4 ; Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Y5 ; Y6 [2, 3]. The system of homogenous equations leads to a
polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues. The polynomial character-
istic equations accept by set of the below circuit variables, circuit variables
derivative and circuit variables second order derivative with respect to time into
Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching networks equivalent circuit. Our Small
Signal (SS) amplifier with matching L networks equivalent circuit fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½iRs ; iC1 ; iL1 ; iL3 ; iLeplg ; iRc ;
iL4 ; y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ; y5 ; y6 ekt are: j = 0(first fixed point), j = 1(second fixed point),
j = 2(third fixed point), etc.,
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2 ekt ; Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3 ekt ; Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4 ekt
P 2
ðjÞ ðjÞ
X2
ðjÞ
kðt si Þ
kt kt
Y5 ðtÞ ¼ Y5 þ y5 e ; Y6 ðtÞ ¼ Y6 þ y6 e ; IRs ðt si Þ ¼ IRs þ iRs e i¼1
i¼1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IC1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ IC1 þ iC1 ekðts2 Þ ; IL1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ekðts2 Þ ;
ðjÞ
ILeplg ðtÞ ¼ ILeplg þ iLeplg ekt
P
3
ðjÞ ðjÞ
X
3
ðjÞ
kðt si Þ
kt kt
IL3 ðtÞ ¼ IL3 þ iL3 e ; IRc ðtÞ ¼ IRc þ iRc e ; IL1 ðt si Þ ¼ IL 1 þ iL1 e i¼2
i¼2
ðjÞ kðts3 Þ ðjÞ
ILeplg ðt s3 Þ ¼ ILeplg þ iLeplg e ; IL3 ðt s3 Þ ¼ IL3 þ iL3 ekðts3 Þ ;
ðjÞ
IRc ðt s3 Þ ¼ IRc þ iRc ekðts3 Þ
IL4 ðtÞ
dIRs dIL dIL3
¼ iRs k ekt ; 1 þ ¼ ½iL1 þ iL1 k ekt
dt dt dt
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 445
dY2 1 X 2
1 1 1
¼ IRs ðt si Þ þ IC1 ðt s2 Þ Y1 Rs
dt C C1 L13 i¼1
CC1 L13 L13 L13
1 dXs ðtÞ
Y3 Rb2 þ
L13 dt
P2
1 kðt si Þ 1
kt ðjÞ ðjÞ
y2 k e ¼ ðIRs þ iRs e i¼1 Þþ ðI þ iC1 ekðts2 Þ Þ
CC1 L13 CC1 L13 C1
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 dXs ðtÞ
ðY1 þ y1 ekt Þ Rs ðY3 þ y3 ekt Þ Rb2 þ
L13 L13 L13 dt
0 1
P
2
k t si
1 B ðjÞ C
y2 k ekt ¼ @IRs þ iRs e i¼1
A
CC1 L13
1 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ IC1 þ iC1 ekðts2 Þ ðY1 þ y1 ekt Þ Rs
CC1 L13 L13
1 ðjÞ
Y3 þ y3 ekt Rb2
L13
P 2
k t si
1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ
y2 k ekt ¼ I iR e i¼1
þ I
CC1 L13 Rs CC1 L13 s CC1 L13 C1
1
þ iC1 ekðts2 Þ
CC1 L13
1 ðjÞ Rs Rb ðjÞ Rb
Y1 Rs y1 ekt 2 Y3 2 y3 ekt
L13 L13 L13 L13
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ Rb ðjÞ
y2 k ekt ¼ I þ I Y Rs 2 Y3
CC1 L13 Rs CC1 L13 C1 L13 1 L13
P2
k t si
1
iRs e i¼1
CC1 L13
1 Rs Rb
þ iC1 ekðts2 Þ y1 ekt 2 y3 ekt
CC1 L13 L13 L13
446 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
P2
1 kðt si Þ 1 Rs
kt
y2 k e ¼ iRs e i¼1 þ iC1 ekðts2 Þ y1 ekt
CC1 L13 CC1 L13 L13
Rb
2 y3 ekt
L13
P
2
1 k si 1 Rs Rb
y2 k iRs e i¼1 þ iC1 eks2 y1 2 y3 ¼ 0
CC1 L13 CC1 L13 L13 L13
dY5 1 1 X3
¼ ½IL1 ðt s2 Þ ILeplg IL3 IRc þ ½IL1 ðt si Þ
dt Cc2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg i¼2
IL4 ðtÞ Rce
ILeplg ðt s3 Þ IL3 ðt s3 Þ IRc ðt s3 Þ Y4
C2 Lecplg Lecplg
1 h
ðjÞ ðjÞ
y5 k ekt ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ekðts2 Þ ILep lg þ iLep lg ekt
Cc2 Lecplg
i
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL3 þ iL3 ekt IRc þ iRc ekt
0 P3 1
1 kðt si Þ
ðjÞ A ILðjÞ þ iLep lg ekðts3 Þ
þ ½@IL1 þ iL1 e i¼2
C2 Lecplg ep lg
ðjÞ
IL3 þ iL3 ekðts3 Þ
ðjÞ
IL4 þ iL4 ekt R
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IRc þ iRc ekðts3 Þ Y4 þ y4 ekt
ce
C2 Lecplg Lecplg
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 447
kt 1 ðjÞ 1 kðts2 Þ
y5 k e ¼ I þ iL e
Cc2 Lecplg L1 Cc2 Lecplg 1
1 ðjÞ 1
ILeplg þ iLeplg ekt
Cc2 Lecplg Cc2 Lecplg
1 ðjÞ 1
IL 3 þ iL3 ekt
Cc2 Lecplg Cc2 Lecplg
1 ðjÞ 1 kt
I þ iR e
Cc2 Lecplg Rc Cc2 Lecplg c
0 P3 1
1 1 kðt si Þ
ðjÞ
þ@ I þ iL e i¼2 A
C2 Lecplg L1 C2 Lecplg 1
1 ðjÞ 1
ILeplg þ iLeplg ekðts3 Þ
C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg
1 ðjÞ 1 kðts3 Þ
I þ iL e
C2 Lecplg L3 C2 Lecplg 3
1 ðjÞ 1
IR c þ iRc ekðts3 Þ
C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg
ðjÞ
IL 4 iL4 ekt ðjÞ Rce Rce
Y4 þ y4 ekt
C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg Lecplg Lecplg
1 1 kðt si Þ
iRc ekt þ iL1 e i¼2
Cc2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg
1 1
iL ekðts3 Þ iL ekðts3 Þ
C2 Lecplg eplg C2 Lecplg 3
1
iR ekðts3 Þ
C2 Lecplg c
iL4 ekt Rce
y4 ekt
C2 Lecplg Lecplg
448 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
@ fixed point
1 1
y5 k ekt ¼ iL ekðts2 Þ iL ekt
Cc2 Lecplg 1 Cc2 Lecplg eplg
1 1
iL ekt iR ekt
Cc2 Lecplg 3 Cc2 Lecplg c
P3
1 kðt si Þ 1
þ i L1 e i¼2 iL ekðts3 Þ
C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg eplg
1 1
iL3 ekðts3 Þ iR ekðts3 Þ
C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg c
iL4 ekt Rce
y4 ekt
C2 Lecplg Lecplg
1 1 1
y5 k ¼ iL eks2 iL iL
Cc2 Lecplg 1 Cc2 Lecplg eplg Cc2 Lecplg 3
P3
1 1 k si
iRc þ iL1 e i¼2
Cc2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg
1 1
iLeplg eks3 iL eks3
C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg 3
1 i L4 Rce
iRc eks3 y4
C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg Lecplg
1 1 1
y5 k þ iL eks2 iL iL
Cc2 Lecplg 1 Cc2 Lecplg eplg Cc2 Lecplg 3
P3
1 1 k si 1
iR þ iL e i¼2 iL eks3
Cc2 Lecplg c C2 Lecplg 1 C2 Lecplg eplg
1 1 iL4 Rce
iL eks3 iR eks3 y4 ¼0
C2 Lecplg 3 C2 Lecplg c C2 Lecplg Lecplg
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 449
P3
1 k si 1
y5 k þ ðeks2 þ e i¼2 Þ iL1 ð1 þ eks3 Þ iLeplg
Cc2 Lecplg Cc2 Lecplg
1 1 i L4
ð1 þ eks3 Þ iL3 ð1 þ eks3 Þ iRc
C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg
Rce
y4 ¼0
Lecplg
dY6 1 X3
1 1
¼ IL1 ðt si Þ ILeplg ðt s3 Þ IL ðt s3 Þ
dt C2 L4 i¼2
C2 L4 C2 L4 3
1 1 1
IRc ðt s3 Þ IL ðtÞ Y6 ðt s4 Þ Rload
C2 L4 C2 L4 4 L4
P3
1 kðt si Þ 1
ðjÞ ðjÞ
y6 k ekt ¼ ðIL1 þ iL1 e i¼2 Þ ðI þ iLeplg ekðts3 Þ Þ
C2 L4 C2 L4 Leplg
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
ðI þ iL3 ekðts3 Þ Þ ðI þ iRc ekðts3 Þ Þ
C2 L4 L3 C2 L4 Rc
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
ðI þ iL4 ekt Þ ðY6 þ y6 ekðts4 Þ Þ Rload
C2 L4 L4 L4
P3
1 1 kðt si Þ 1
kt ðjÞ ðjÞ
y6 k e ¼ I L1 þ iL1 e i¼2 I
C2 L4 C2 L4 C2 L4 Leplg
1 1 ðjÞ 1
iL ekðts3 Þ I iL ekðts3 Þ
C2 L4 eplg C2 L4 L3 C2 L4 3
1 ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ 1
IRc iRc ekðts3 Þ I L4 iL ekt
C2 L4 C2 L4 C2 L4 C2 L4 4
Rload ðjÞ Rload
Y6 y6 ekðts4 Þ
L4 L4
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
y6 k ekt ¼ I I I I
C2 L4 L1 C2 L4 Leplg C2 L4 L3 C2 L4 Rc
1 ðjÞ Rload ðjÞ
I L4 Y6
C2 L4 L4
P3
1 kðt si Þ 1
þ i L1 e i¼2 iL ekðts3 Þ
C2 L4 C2 L4 eplg
1 1
iL ekðts3 Þ iR ekðts3 Þ
C2 L4 3 C2 L4 c
1 Rload
iL4 ekt y6 ekðts4 Þ
C2 L4 L4
450 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
@ fixed point
1 kðt si Þ 1
kt
y6 k e ¼ i L1 e i¼2 iL ekðts3 Þ
C2 L4 C2 L4 eplg
1 1
iL ekðts3 Þ iR ekðts3 Þ
C2 L4 3 C2 L4 c
1 Rload
iL4 ekt y6 ekðts4 Þ
C2 L4 L4
P3
1 kðt si Þ 1
kt
y6 k e þ i L1 e i¼2 iL ekðts3 Þ
C2 L4 C2 L4 eplg
1 1
iL3 ekðts3 Þ iR ekðts3 Þ
C2 L4 C2 L4 c
1 Rload
iL ekt y6 ekðts4 Þ ¼ 0
C2 L4 4 L4
P3
1 k si 1
y6 k þ iL1 e i¼2 iL eks3
C2 L4 C2 L4 eplg
1 1
iL eks3 iR eks3
C2 L4 3 C2 L4 c
1 Rload
iL y6 eks4 ¼ 0
C2 L4 4 L4
dIRs ðjÞ
¼ Y1 ) iRs k ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt )Y ðjÞ ¼0 iRs k þ y1 ¼ 0
dt 1
ðiL1 þ iL3 Þ k þ y2 ¼ 0
dIL3 ðjÞ
¼ Y3 ) iL3 k ekt ¼ Y3 þ y3 ekt )Y ðjÞ ¼0 iL3 k þ y3 ¼ 0
dt 3
dIRce ðjÞ
¼Y4 ) iRce k ekt ¼ Y4 þ y4 ekt )Y ðjÞ ¼0 iRce k þ y4 ¼ 0
dt 4
ðiLeplg iLcplg Þ k þ y5 ¼ 0
dIL4 ðjÞ
¼ Y6 ) iL4 k ekt ¼ Y6 þ y6 ekt )Y ðjÞ ¼0 iL4 k þ y6 ¼ 0
dt 6
P
2
1 k si 1 Rs Rb
y2 k iRs e i¼1 þ iC1 eks2 y1 2 y3 ¼ 0
CC1 L13 CC1 L13 L13 L13
P 3
1 k si 1
ks2
y5 k þ ðe þ e i¼2 Þ iL1 ð1 þ eks3 Þ iLeplg
Cc2 Lecplg Cc2 Lecplg
1
ð1 þ eks3 Þ iL3
C2 Lecplg
1 i L4 Rce
ð1 þ eks3 Þ iRc y4 ¼0
C2 Lecplg C2 Lecplg Lecplg
P3
The small increments of our Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching
networks can be divided to two matrixes. The first matrix is (8x8) and the second
matrix is (6x8).
0 1
y2
B C 0 1
B iRs C i C1
B C B C
0 1 B C
B y5 C 0 1 B y1 C
!11 . . . !18 B C N11 ... N16 B C
B C
B .. .. .. C B i C
B L1 C þ B .. .. .. C B y3 C
@ . . . A Bi C @ . . . A B C ¼ 0; !11
B L3 C B iLeplg C
!81 !88 B C N81 N86 B C
B iL4 C B i C
B C @ Rc A
B y C
@ 6A y4
iRce
P2
1 k si
¼ k; !12 ¼ e i¼1
CC1 L13
!13 ¼ !14 ¼ !15 ¼ !16 ¼ !17 ¼ !18 ¼ 0; !21 ¼ 0; !22 ¼ k; !23 ¼ !24 ¼ !25
¼ !26 ¼ !27 ¼ !28 ¼ 0
P
3
1 k si
ks2
!31 ¼ !32 ¼ 0; !33 ¼ k; !34 ¼ ðe þ e i¼2 Þ;
Cc2 Lecplg
1
!35 ¼ ð1 þ eks3 Þ
C2 Lecplg
1
!36 ¼ ; !37 ¼ !38 ¼ 0; !41 ¼ 1; !42 ¼ !43 ¼ 0;
C2 Lecplg
!44 ¼ k; !45 ¼ !46 ¼ !47 ¼ !48 ¼ 0
4.3 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers Matching Network Stability Analysis … 453
1 k si
!66 ¼ k; !67 ¼ 1; !68 ¼ 0; !71 ¼ !72 ¼ !73 ¼ 0; !74 ¼ e i¼2 ;
C2 L4
1
!75 ¼ eks3
C2 L4
1 Rload ks4
!76 ¼ ; !77 ¼ ðk þ e Þ; !78 ¼ 0; !81 ¼ . . . ¼ !87 ¼ 0;
C2 L4 L4
!88 ¼ k
1 Rs Rb
N11 ¼ eks2 ; N12 ¼ ; N13 ¼ 2 ; N14 ¼ N15 ¼ N16 ¼ 0
CC1 L13 L13 L13
N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ 1; N23 ¼ N24 ¼ N25 ¼ N26 ¼ 0; N31 ¼ N32 ¼ N33 ¼ 0;
1
N34 ¼ ð1 þ eks3 Þ
Cc2 Lecplg
1 Rce
N35 ¼ ð1 þ eks3 Þ; N36 ¼ ; N41 ¼ N42 ¼ 0;
C2 Lecplg Lecplg
N43 ¼ 1; N44 ¼ N45 ¼ N46 ¼ 0
N51 ¼ N52 ¼ 0; N53 ¼ 1; N54 ¼ N55 ¼ N56 ¼ 0; N61 ¼ . . . ¼ N66 ¼ 0;
N71 ¼ N72 ¼ N73 ¼ 0
1 1
N74 ¼ eks3 ; N75 ¼ eks3 ; N76 ¼ 0; N81 ¼ . . . ¼ N85 ¼ 0;
C2 L4 C2 L4
N86 ¼ 1
0 1
iC1
B C
0 1 B y1 C
N11 . . . N16 B C
B C
B .. .. .. C B y3 C
We consider in our analysis the following: @ . . . AB C!e
B iLeplg C
N61 N66 B C
B i C
@ Rc A
y4
0 1
N11 . . . N16
B . .. .. C
Since N61 ¼ . . . ¼ N66 ¼ 0 then det@ .. . . A¼0
N61 N66
We consider in our stability analysis small increments Jacobian of our Small
Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching networks, first matrix is (8 8) [5, 6].
454 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
0 1
y2
B C
B iRs C
B C
0 1 B
B y5 CC
!11 . . . !18 B C
B .. .. .. C B
B
i L1 C
C ¼ 0; A k I
@ . . . AB i L3 C
B C
!81 !88 B C
B i L4 C
B C
B y6 C
@ A
iRce
0 1
!11 . . . !18
B .. .. .. C
¼@ . . . A; detjA k Ij ¼ 0
!81 !88
1 Rload ks4
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; s4 Þ ¼ k8 þ k6 þ k7 e ; s4 ¼ s
C2 L4 L4
1 Rload ks
Dðk; sÞ ¼ k8 þ k6 þ k7 e
C2 L4 L4
We need to get the characteristic equation for stability analysis. We study the
occurrence of any possible stability switching resulting from the increase of value
of the time delay s parameter then Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ eks .
Pn
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ is Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ kk . The expression for
k¼0
P
m
Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ k . Pn¼8 ðkÞ ¼ k8 þ k6 C21L4 ; Qm¼7 ðkÞ¼k7 RLload
k
4
k¼0
1
n ¼ 8; m ¼ 7; n [ m; p0 ðsÞ ¼ . . . ¼ p5 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p6 ðsÞ ¼ ; p7 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p8 ðsÞ
C2 L4
¼1
arguments. Furthermore P(k), Q(k) are analytic functions of k, for which the fol-
lowing requirements of the analysis (Kuang and Cong 2005; Kuang 1993) can also
be verified in the present case.
(a) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R then Pði xÞ þ Qði xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ=PðkÞj is bounded for jkj ! 1; Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 . It has a finite number of zeros; indeed, this is
a polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable with
respect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ cannot have common imaginary roots.
That is for any real number x; Pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0.
1 Rload
Pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x8 x6 ; Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ i x7
C2 L4 L4
1 R load
Pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x8 x6 i x7 6¼ 0
C2 L4 L4
1 1 R2
jPði xÞj2 ¼ x16 þ x12 2 2 2 x14 ; jQði xÞj2 ¼ x14 load
C2 L4 C2 L4 L24
2
1 1 14 Rload
FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 ¼ x16 þ x12 2 x 14
x
C22 L24 C2 L4 L24
1 R2 1
FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 ¼ x16 ½2 þ load x14 þ x12 2 2
C2 L4 L24 C2 L4
1 R2 1
U16 ¼ 1; U14 ¼ ½2 þ load ; U12 ¼ 2 2 ; U2k ¼ 0 8 k ¼ 0; . . .; 5
C2 L4 L42 C2 L4
P
8
Hence FðxÞ ¼ 0 implies U2k x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the polynomial. Furthermore
1
PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x8 x6 ; PI ði x; sÞ ¼ 0; QR ði x; sÞ ¼ 0;
C2 L4
Rload
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ x7
L4
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
456 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
½x8 x6 C21L4 x7 RLload 1 1 L4
sin hðsÞ ¼ 4
¼ x ; cos hðsÞ ¼ 0
x14
R2load x C2 L4 Rload
L24
1 Rload
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0; PðkÞ ¼ k8 þ k6 ; QðkÞ ¼ k7
C2 L4 L4
the parameters C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... Re k may at the crossing, change its sign from (−) to
(+), that is, from a stable focus E IRs ; IC 1 ; IL1 ; IL3 ; . . . to an unstable one, or vice
versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial
derivatives with respect to C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... and Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L
matching networks parameters.
@Rek @Rek
K1 ðC2 Þ ¼ ; L4 ; Rload ; . . . ¼ const; K1 ðL4 Þ ¼ ;
@C2 k¼ix @L4 k¼ix
C2 ; Rload ; . . . ¼ const
X
@Rek 8
K1 ðRload Þ ¼ ; C2 ; L4 ; . . . ¼ const: Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 ) U2k x2k ¼ 0:
@Rload k¼ix k¼0
When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ; QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ and inserting
k ¼ i x; x 2 R into Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching networks sys-
tem’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin x s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos x s ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ s ¼ hðsÞ þ n 2 p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ
þ n2p
; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions
I ! R; Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and differentiable
in s. In the following, the subscripts k; x; C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... indicate the corresponding
458 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
where Pk ¼ @P
@k …etc., substituting k ¼ i x and bearing Pði xÞ ¼ Pði xÞ and
Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ. Then i Pk ði xÞ ¼ Px ði xÞ;i Qk ði xÞ ¼ Qx ði xÞ and
that on the surface jPði xÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 , one obtain:
When (x) can be any Small Signal (SS) amplifier with L matching network
parameters C2 ; L4 ; Rload;... and any time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we
dropped the arguments ði x; xÞ, and where
1 Rload
PR ¼ x8 x6 ; PI ¼ 0; QR ¼ 0; QI ¼ x7 ;
C2 L4 L4
1
PRx ¼ 8 x7 6 x5
C2 L4
Rload
PIx ¼ 0; QRx ¼ 0; QIx ¼ 7 x6 ; PRs ¼ 0; PIs ¼ 0; QRs ¼ 0; QIs ¼ 0
L4
Fx ¼ 2 ½ðPRx PR þ PIx PI Þ ðQRx QR þ QIx QI Þ;
1 2
P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I ¼ x12 ½x2
C2 L4
Fx
Fx ¼ 2 ½ðPRx PR þ PIx PI Þ ðQRx QR þ QIx QI Þ; xx ¼
Fx
V ¼ ðPR PIx PI PRx Þ ðQR QIx QI QRx Þ. First we choose our specific
parameter as time delay s. PRx PR ¼ ½8 x7 6 x5 C21L4 ½x8 x6 C21L4
1 1
PRx PR ¼ 2 x11 ½4 x4 7 x2 þ3 ; QRx QR ¼ 0; PIx PI ¼ 0
C2 L4 ðC2 L4 Þ2
2
Rload
QIx QI ¼ 7 x13 ; PR PIx ¼ 0; PI PRx ¼ 0; QR QIx ¼ 0; QI QRx ¼ 0
L4
( " # )
1 1 Rload 2
Fs ¼ 0; Fx ¼ 2 2 x 4 x 7 x
11 4 2
þ3 7x 13
C2 L 4 ðC2 L4 Þ2 L4
( 2 ! )
2 Rload 6
Fx ¼ 2 x11 8 x4 7 x2 þ þ ; xs ¼ 0; V ¼ 0; U ¼ 0
C2 L4 L4 ðC2 L4 Þ2
@x @x Fs @Rek
Fx þ Fs ¼ 0; s 2 I ) xs ¼ ¼ ; K1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ
@s @s Fx @s k¼ix
( )
2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx @Rek
K1 ðsÞ ¼ Re ; signfK 1
ðsÞg ¼ sign
Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2 @s k¼ix
( )
@x
@x U @s þ V
signfK1 ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g sign s þxþ
@s jPj2
" ( )#
1 2 Rload 2 6
signfK ðsÞg ¼ sign 2 x 8 x 7 x ð
11 4 2
þ½ Þþ signfxg
C 2 L4 L4 ðC2 L4 Þ2
DC/RF isolation inductor is the main challenge. The inductor must provide high
reactance across the bands of interest (XL ! ∞; ZL = XL) and it must carry the
required DC current. Inductor’s Q must be high to minimize inductor power dis-
sipation due to the RF signal
ðQ ! 1 ) PL ðaverageÞ ! e ) R ! eÞ. The real component of an inductor
has loss due to the resistive component. The stored energy in the inductor is marked
as EL. The average power dissipated in an inductor is marked as Pavg.
We analyze the stability of Bias T circuit which feed coax cable. For Bias T’s
microstrip lines circuit connections, we represent microstrip as a delay lines in time.
We neglect the voltage on delay lines Vsi ! e then Vsi ! e 8 i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; 5
(Fig. 4.13).
The delay is in the current that flows through microstrip represented delay line
IðtÞ ! Iðt si Þ (Fig. 4.14).
The purpose of the inductor L1 is to prevent the RF signal from entering DC
path, and the purpose of the capacitor C1 is to keep the DC signal from entering the
RF path. The inductor and capacitor should be designed such that the upper cut-off
frequency of the low pass DC path is lower than the lower cut-off frequency of the
high pass RF path. We define Rload as the total resistance seen at the RF + DC port
(purely resistive). The equivalent circuit for the proposed system is as follow
(Fig. 4.15):
Terminology: Tau1 $ s1 ; Tau2 $ s2 ; Tau3 $ s3 ;Tau4 $ s4 ; Tau5 $ s5
Fig. 4.15 Full Bias-T circuit implementation with delay lines and nodes index
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 463
KCL @ A52 ) IRb ðt s5 Þ ¼ I52a ðtÞ þ I52b ðtÞ; IC2 ¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ; IR1 ðtÞ
¼ I52b ðt s3 Þ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IR1 ðtÞ
d d
IC1 ¼ C1 ðVA22 VA31 Þ; VA2 ¼ VA22 ; VA3 ¼ VA31 ; IC1 ¼ C1 ðVA2 VA3 Þ
dt dt
dVA52 dVA5 Vb VA54
IC2 ¼ C2 dt , since A5 ¼ A51 ¼ A52 , IC2 ¼ C2 dt ; IRb ¼ Rb and
Vb VA5 VA51 VA4 VA5 VA4
since A5 ¼ A54 ) IRb ¼ Rb ; IR1 ¼ R1 Since A5 ¼ A51 ) IR 1 ¼
dIL1
R1 VL1 ¼ L1 dt ; VL1 ¼ VA4 VA31 , since VA3 ¼ VA31 ; VL1 ¼ VA4 VA3 ;
dIL1
VA4 VA3 ¼ L1 dt
VA32 VA3
VA3 ¼ VA31 ¼ VA32 ) IRload ¼ ¼
Rload Rload
Remark: we consider in our analysis VA52 [ VA31 then the current flow is from
node A5-2 to node A3-1 otherwise ðVA52 \VA31 Þ the current flow is from node A3-1
to node A5-2.
Vs ðtÞ VA2
IR s ¼ ) Vs ðtÞ VA2 ¼ IRs Rs ) VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs
Rs
IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IRs ðt s1 Þ; IC1 ðt s2 Þ þ IL1 ðt s2 Þ
¼ IRload ðtÞ; IRs ðt s1 s2 Þ þ IL1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ IRload ðtÞ
dVA5 dVA5
IC2 ¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ; IC2 ¼ C2 ; I52a ðt s4 Þ ¼ C2 ) VA5
Z dt dt
1
¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ dt
C2
Vb VA5
IRb ¼ ) Vb VA5 ¼ IRb Rb ) VA5 ¼ Vb IRb Rb ; IR1
Rb
VA VA4
¼ 5 ) VA5 VA4 ¼ IR1 R1
R1
464 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
VA3 X 2
IRload ¼ ) VA3 ¼ IRload Rload ; VA3 ¼ Rload ½IRs ðt si Þ þ IL1 ðt s2 Þ
Rload i¼1
Z
d 1
IC1 ¼ C1 ðVA2 VA3 Þ ) VA2 VA3 ¼ IC1 dt; VA2 VA3
dt C1
Z
1
¼ IRs ðt s1 Þ dtIRb ðt s5 Þ ¼ I52a ðtÞ þ I52b ðtÞ ) I52b ðtÞ
C1
¼ IRb ðt s5 Þ I52a ðtÞ; I52b ðt s3 Þ ¼ IRb ðt s5 s3 Þ I52a ðt s3 ÞIR1
VA VA4
¼ 5 ) VA5 VA4 ¼ IR1 R1 ; VA5 VA4 ¼ IR1 R1 ;
R1
IR1 ðtÞ ¼ I52b ðt s3 Þ; IR1 ðtÞ ¼ I52b ðt s3 Þ
¼ IRb ðt s5 s3 Þ I52a ðt s3 Þ;
VA5 VA4 ¼ ½IRb ðt s5 s3 Þ I52a ðt s3 Þ R1
We can summery our intermediate equations:
Z
1
VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs ;VA5 ¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ dt; VA5 ¼ Vb IRb Rb
C2
" #
X2
VA5 VA4 ¼ IR1 R1 ¼ I52b ðt s3 Þ R1 ; VA3 ¼ Rload IRs ðt si Þ þ IL1 ðt s2 Þ
i¼1
Z
1
VA2 VA3 ¼ IRs ðt s1 Þ dt; VA5 VA4 ¼ ½IRb ðt s5 s3 Þ I52a ðt s3 Þ R1
C1
2 0 1 3
6 B X
5 C 7
VA5 VA4 ¼ 6 B
4IRb @t si C 7
A I52a ðt s3 Þ5 R1
i¼3
i6¼4
Z Z
1 1
VA5 ¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ dt; VA5 ¼ Vb IRb Rb ) I52a ðt s4 Þ dt ¼ Vb IRb Rb
C C2
2Z
d 1 d 1 dVb dIRb dVb
I52a ðt s4 Þ dt ¼ fVb IRb Rb g ) I52a ðt s4 Þ ¼ Rb ; ¼0
dt C2 dt C2 dt dt dt
1 dIR dIRb 1
I52a ðt s4 Þ ¼ b Rb ) ¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ
C2 dt dt C2 Rb
Z
1
Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs VA3 ¼ IRs ðt s1 Þ dt ) VA2
C1
X
2 Z
1
Rload ½IRs ðt si Þ þ IL1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ IRs ðt s1 Þ dt
i¼1
C1
X
2 Z
1
Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs Rload ½IRs ðt si Þ þ IL1 ðt s2 Þ ¼ IRs ðt s1 Þ dt
i¼1
C1
X2 Z
d d 1
fVs ðtÞ IRs Rs Rload ½IRs ðt si Þ þ IL1 ðt s2 Þg ¼ f IRs ðt s1 Þ dtg
dt i¼1
dt C1
P
2
dIRs ðt si Þ
dVs ðtÞ dIRs i¼1 dIL1 ðt s2 Þ IR ðt s1 Þ
Rs Rload ½ þ ¼ s
dt dt dt dt C1
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 465
2 0 1 3
6 B X
5 C 7 dIL1
VA4 ¼ VA5 6I
4 @R b
Bt si C 7
A I52a ðt s3 Þ5 R1 ; VA4 ¼ VA3 þ L1 dt
i¼3
i6¼4
" ! !#
dIL1 X5
VA3 þ L1 ¼ VA5 IRb t si I52a ðt s3 R1
dt i¼3
i6¼4
" ! # Z
X
2
dIL 1
Rload IRs t si þ IL1 ðt s2 Þ þ L1 1 ¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ dt
i¼1
dt C2
" !#
X
5
IRb t si Þ I52a ðt s3 R1
i¼3
i6¼4
Z " ! #
1 X
2
I52a ðt s4 Þ dt ¼ Rload IRs t si þ IL1 ðt s2 Þ
C2 i¼1
" !#
dIL1 X5
þ L1 þ IR b t si Þ I52a ðt s3 R1
dt i¼3
i6¼4
Z " ! #
d 1 d X2
I52a ðt s4 Þ dt ¼ fRload IRs t si þ IL1 ðt s2 Þ
dt C2 dt i¼1
dIL1 X5
þ L1 þ ½IRb ðt si Þ I52a ðt s3 Þ R1 g
dt i¼3
i6¼4
P
2
dIRs ðt si Þ
I52a ðt s4 Þ i¼1 dIL1 ðt s2 Þ d 2 IL
¼ Rload þ Rload þ L1 2 1
C2 dt dt dt
P
5
dIRb ðt si Þ
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt s3 Þ
þ R1 R1
dt dt
P2
dIRs ðt si Þ
2
d IL I52a ðt s4 Þ i¼1 dIL ðt s2 Þ
L1 2 1 ¼ Rload Rload 1
dt C2 dt dt
P5
dIRb ðt si Þ
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt s3 Þ
R1 þ R1
dt dt
466 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
dIRb
We can summery our equations as follow: dt ¼ C21Rb I52a ðt s4 Þ
P
2
dIRs ðt si Þ
dVs ðtÞ dIRs i¼1 dIL1 ðt s2 Þ IR ðt s1 Þ
Rs Rload ½ þ ¼ s
dt dt dt dt C1
P
2
dIRs ðt si Þ
d IL2
I52a ðt s4 Þ i¼1 dIL1 ðt s2 Þ
L1 2 1 ¼ Rload Rload
dt C2 dt dt
P5
dIRb ðt si Þ
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt s3 Þ
R1 þ R1
dt dt
2 3
P2
dIRs t si
d 2 IL1 I52a ðt s4 Þ 6 dIL1 ðt s2 Þ7
L1 ¼ Rload 6
4
i¼1
þ 7
5
dt2 C2 dt dt
0 1
B P
5
C
dIRb @t si A
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt s3 Þ
R1 þ R1
dt dt
d 2 IL1 I52a ðt s4 Þ dVs ðtÞ dIRs IRs ðt s1 Þ
L1 ¼ R s
dt2 C2 dt dt C1
0 1
B P
5
C
dIRb @t si A
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt s3 Þ
R1 þ R1
dt dt
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 467
dIRb 1
¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ
dt C2 Rb
d 2 IL I52a ðt s4 Þ dVs ðtÞ dIRs IR ðt s1 Þ
L1 2 1 ¼ Rs s
dt C2 dt dt C1
0 1
P 5
dIRb @t si A
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt s3 Þ
R1 þ R1
dt dt
dIRb d 2 IL1
Some definitions for new variables: dt ¼ C21Rb I52a ðt s4 Þ; dYdt1 ¼ dt2 ;
dIL1
dt ¼ Y1
dY1 I52a ðt s4 Þ dVs ðtÞ dIRs IRs ðt s1 Þ
L1 ¼ Rs
dt C2 dt dt C1
0 1
B P
5
C
dIRb @t si A
i¼3
i6¼4 dI52a ðt s3 Þ
R1 þ R1
dt dt
P
5
dIRb ðt si Þ
i¼3
dIL1 i6¼4 ðts3 Þ
At fixed point: dt ¼ 0; dYdt1 ¼ 0; dIdtRs ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dI52adt ¼0
X
5
lim I52a ðt s4 Þ ¼ I52a ðtÞ; lim IRs ðt s1 Þ ¼ IRs ðtÞ; lim IRb ðt si Þ ¼ IRb ðtÞ
t!1 t!1 t!1
i¼3
i6¼4
X
5
lim I52a ðt s3 Þ ¼ I52a ðtÞ; t [ [ s4 ; t [ [ s1 ; t [ [ si ; t [ [ s3
t!1
i¼3
i6¼4
j is the Index of system fixed points, first fixed point j = 0, second fixed point j = 1,
third fixed point j = 2, etc.,
468 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium
points of the Bias-T circuit which feed coax cable consists in adding to
coordinate Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3; I52a ; IRs arbitrarily small increments of exponentially form
½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; i52a ; iRs ekt and retaining the first order terms in Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3; I52a ; IRs . The
system of homogenous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in
the eigenvalues. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set of the below
circuit variables, circuit variables derivative and circuit variables second order
derivative with respect to time into Bias-T circuit which feed coax cable equivalent
circuit. Our Bias-T circuit which feed coax cable equivalent circuit fixed values
with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; i52a ; iRs ekt are:
j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ekt ; Y1 ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt ; I52a
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ I52a þ i52a ekt ; IRs ¼ IRs þ iRs ekt ; IRb ¼ IRb þ iRb ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
I52a ðt s4 Þ ¼ I52a þ i52a ekðts4 Þ ; IRs ðt s1 Þ ¼ IRs þ iRs ekðts1 Þ ;
X
5
ðjÞ
X
5
IRb ðt si Þ ¼ IRb þ iRb exp½k ðt si Þ
i¼3 i¼3
i6¼4 i6¼4
dIL1 dY1 dI52a
¼ iL1 k ekt ; ¼ y1 k ekt ;
dt dt dt
kt dIRs kt dIRb
¼ i52a k e ; ¼ iRs k e ; ¼ iRb k ekt
dt dt
dI52a ðt s4 Þ dIR ðt s1 Þ
¼ i52a k ekt eks4 ; s
dt dt !
P 5
dIRb t si
i¼3
i6¼4
¼ iRs k ekt eks1 ;
dt
X
5
¼ iRb k ekt exp½k ðt si Þ
i¼3
i6¼4
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 469
ðjÞ dI52a ðt s3 Þ
I52a ðt s3 Þ ¼ I52a þ i52a ekðts3 Þ ;
dt
kt ks3 ðjÞ
¼ i52a k e e ; Y2 ¼ Y2 þ y2 ekt
!
P 5
dIRb t si
i¼3
i6¼4 dIRb X 5
¼ exp½k ðt si Þ
dt dt i¼3
i6¼4
1 X5
dI52a ðt s3 Þ dI52a ks3
¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ exp½k ðt si Þ; ¼ e
C2 Rb i¼3
dt dt
i6¼4
For k < 0, t > 0, the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 is
unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for k < 0, t > 0
otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the eigenvalue
parameter which is established if the fixed point is stable or unstable; additionally,
his absolute value |k| established the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point [5, 6].
dIRb
We can rewrite our system differential equations: dt ¼ C21Rb I52a ðt s4 Þ;
dIL1
dt ¼ Y1
2 3
dY1 1 6 R1 X5 7
L1 ¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ 6
41þ exp½k ðt si Þ7
5
dt C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
dY1 1 R1 X5
¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ ½1 þ exp½k ðt si Þ þ Y2
dt L1 C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðt s1 Þ R1 1 dVs ðtÞ
þ s þ Y3 eks3
L1 C1 L1 L1 L1 dt
8 2 39
> P
2
>
> dIRs ðt si Þ >
dIRs 1 dVs ðtÞ 1 < 1 6 dIL1 ðt s2 Þ7=
¼ I ðt s1 Þ þ Rload 6
4
i¼1
þ 7
5>
dt Rs dt >C 1 R s
Rs > dt dt >
: ;
P
2
dIRs ðt si Þ X5
i¼1 dIRs ðtÞ dIR ðt s1 Þ dIRs ðtÞ ks1
¼ exp½k ðt si Þ; s ¼ e
dt dt i¼3
dt dt
i6¼4
P
2
dIRs ðt si Þ
dIRs 1 dVs ðtÞ 1 Rload i¼1 Rload dIL1 ðt s2 Þ
¼ IRs ðt s1 Þ
dt Rs dt C 1 Rs Rs dt Rs dt
dIRs Rload X
5
1 dVs ðtÞ 1 Rload dIL1 ðt s2 Þ
½1 þ exp½k ðt si Þ ¼ IRs ðt s1 Þ
dt Rs i¼3
Rs dt C1 Rs Rs dt
i6¼4
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 471
d 2 IRs Rload X5
1 d 2 Vs ðtÞ 1 dIR ðtÞ Rload d 2 IL1 ðt s2 Þ
½1 þ exp½k ðt si Þ ¼ s eks1
dt 2 Rs i¼3
Rs dt 2 C 1 Rs dt Rs dt2
i6¼4
dY2 Rload X5
1 d 2 Vs ðtÞ 1 Rload d 2 IL1 ðt s2 Þ
½1 þ exp½k ðt si Þ ¼ Y2 eks1
dt Rs i¼3
R s dt 2 C 1 R s Rs dt2
i6¼4
d 2 IL1 ðts2 Þ P
5
We consider dt2 ! e ¼ 0 then dY2
dt ½1 þ Rload
Rs exp½k ðt si Þ ¼ R1s
i¼3
i6¼4
d 2 Vs ðtÞ
dt2 C11Rs Y2 eks1
dY2 1 d 2 Vs ðtÞ 1
¼ Y2 eks1
dt P
5 dt2 P
5
Rs ½1 þ Rload
Rs exp½k ðt si Þ C1 Rs ½1 þ Rload
Rs exp½k ðt si Þ
i¼3 i¼3
i6¼4 i6¼4
P
2
Case I: s1 ! eð¼ 0Þ; s2 ! eð¼ 0Þ; si ! e
i¼1
Assumption: Our Bias-T circuit’s first and second microstrips parasitic effect
P
2
(delay parameters in time) is minor, s1 ! eð¼ 0Þ; s2 ! eð¼ 0Þ; si ! e
i¼1
X
5
Rload X5
Rload
lim exp½k ðt si Þ ¼ 1; 1 þ exp½k ðt si Þ ¼ 1 þ ;
si !e Rs Rs
i¼1;2 i¼3 i¼3
i6¼4 i6¼4
dY2 1 d Vs ðtÞ
2
1
¼ Y2 eks1
dt Rs ½1 þ Rs
Rload dt2 C1 Rs ½1 þ Rs
Rload
dY1 1 R1 X5
¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ ½1 þ exp½k ðt si Þ
dt L1 C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðtÞ R1 1 dVs ðtÞ
þ Y2 þ s þ Y3 eks3
L1 C1 L1 L1 L1 dt
472 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
dY1 1 R1 X5
¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ ½1 þ exp½k ðt si Þ þ Y2
dt L1 C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðtÞ R1 1 dVs ðtÞ
þ s þ Y3 eks3
L1 C1 L1 L1 L1 dt
Remark: Some of our system variables include time argument X(t) and other
without time argument. Always consider these system variables as a function of
time.
We consider RF signal source Vs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; jnðtÞj\1 & A0 jnðtÞj [
Under the above consideration we can rewrite our system five Delay Differential
P2
Equations (DDE): s1 ! eð¼ 0Þ; s2 ! eð¼ 0Þ; si ! e; eks1 ! 1
i¼1
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 473
2 3
dY1 1 6 R1 X5 7
¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ 61 þ exp½k ðt si Þ7
5 þ Y2
dt L1 C2 4 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðtÞ R1
þ s þ Y3 eks3
L1 C1 L1 L1
&&&
2 3
dY1 1 6 R1 X5 7
¼ I52a ðt s4 Þ 61 þ exp½k ðt si Þ7
5 þ Y2
dt L1 C2 4 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs IR ðtÞ R1
þ s þ Y3 eks3
L1 C1 L1 L1
2 3
ðjÞ 1 6 R1 X
5 7
y1 k ekt ¼ ½I52a þ i52a ekðts4 Þ 61þ exp½k ðt si Þ7
L1 C2 4 Rb i¼3
5
i6¼4
ðjÞ Rs 1 ðjÞ
þ ½Y2 þ y2 ekt þ ½I þ iRs ekt
L1 C1 L1 Rs
ðjÞ R1
þ ½Y3 þ y3 ekt eks3
L1
2 3
ðjÞ 1 6 R1 X5 7
y1 k ekt ¼ I52a 6
4 1 þ exp½k ðt si Þ7
5
L1 C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ ðjÞ R1
þ Y2 þ I þ Y3 eks3
L1 C1 L1 Rs L1
1 R1 X5
þ ½1 þ exp½k ðt si Þ i52a ekðts4 Þ
L1 C2 Rb i¼3
i6¼4
Rs 1 R1
þ y2 ekt þ iR ekt þ y3 ekt eks3
L1 C1 L1 s L1
474 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
ðjÞ P
5
ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point I52a L11C2 ½1 þ R1
Rb exp½k ðt si Þ þ Y2 LR1s þ 1
C1 L1 IRs þ
i¼3
i6¼4
ðjÞ
Y3 eks3 RL11 ¼ 0
1 R1 X5
Rs
y1 k ekt ¼ ½1 þ exp½k ðt si Þ i52a ekt eks4 þ y2
L1 C2 Rb i¼3
L1
i6¼4
kt 1 R1
e þ iR ekt þ y3 ekt eks3
C1 L1 s L1
Dividing the two side of the above equation by ekt term gives the equation:
2 3
1 6 R1 X5 7 Rs 1
y1 k þ 6
41 þ exp½k ðt si Þ7
5 i52a eks4 þ y2 þ
L1 C2 Rb i¼3
L1 C1 L1
i6¼4
R1
iRs þ y3 eks3
L1
¼0
dY2 1
¼ h i Y2 ; y2 k ekt
dt C1 Rs 1 þ Rload
Rs
1
¼ h i ½Y2ðjÞ þ y2 ekt
C1 Rs 1 þ Rload
Rs
ðjÞ
At fixed point 1
R Y2 ¼ 0; k 1
R y2 ¼ 0
C1 Rs ½1 þ load
Rs C1 Rs ½1 þ load
Rs
dY3 dIR
¼ 0 ) y3 k ekt ¼ 0 ) y3 k ¼ 0; s ¼Y2
dt dt
ðjÞ
) iRs k ekt ¼Y2 þ y2 ekt
ðjÞ
At fixed point Y2 ¼ 0 ) iRs k ekt ¼y2 ekt ) iRs k þ y2 ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ Y3 ) i52a k ekt ¼ Y3 þ y3 ekt . At fixed point Y3 ¼ 0 ) i52a
dI52a
dt
k þ y3 ¼ 0
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 475
1
r6 ¼ h i ; !12 ¼ r1 ; !13 ¼ r2 eks3 ;
C1 Rs 1 þ RRload
s
2 3
6 X
5 7 ks
!14 ¼ r3 ; !15 ¼ r4 6
4 1 þ r 5 exp½k ðt si Þ7
5e
4
i¼3
i6¼4
22 ¼ k þ r6 ; detjA k Ij ¼ k4 ðk þ r6 Þ ¼ 0;
1
k1 ¼ 0; k2 ¼ r6 ¼
C1 Rs ½1 þ RRload
s
476 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
dY2 1
¼ 2 3 Y2 eks1 ;
dt
6 P
5
7
C1 Rs 41 þ Rload
Rs exp½k ðt si Þ5
i¼3
i6¼4
dY3 dIR dI52a
¼ 0; s ¼Y2 ; ¼ Y3
dt dt dt
1
y2 k 2 3 y2 eks1 ¼ 0;
6 P
5
7
C1 Rs 41 þ Rload
Rs exp½k ðt si Þ5
i¼3
i6¼4
y3 k ¼ 0; iRs k þ y2 ¼ 0
4.4 Bias—T Three Port Network Stability Switching … 477
1
!22 ¼ k 2 P2 3 eks1
k si
C1 Rs 41 þ Rload
Rs e i¼1 5
1
r6 ðs1 ; s2 Þ ¼ 2 P2 3 eks1 ; 12 ¼ r1 ; 13 ¼ r2 eks3 ;
k si
C1 Rs 41 þ Rload
Rs e i¼1 5
14 ¼ r3 eks1
2 P
5 3
k si
6 i¼3 7
6 i6¼4 7 ks4
15 ¼ r4 61 þ r5 e 7e ; 22 ¼ k þ r6 ; detjA k Ij ¼ k4 ðk þ r6 Þ ¼ 0
4 5
1
Dðs1 ; s2 Þ ¼ k5 k4 eks ;
C1 Rs ½1 þ RRload
s
e 2ks
X
4
wi ðk; sÞ ki ¼ k4 þ k3 ðC3 þ C1 Þ þ k2 ðC4 þ C1 C3 þ C2 Þ
i¼0
þ k ðC1 C4 þ C3 C2 Þ þ C2 C4
Remark: it is easier to solve the above equations numerically rather than ana-
lytically. The target is to find the two quadratic equations parameters as a function
of Qm ðk; sÞ.Ck ðQm ðk; sÞ; s; . . .Þ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4.
P
4
We have two possible solutions: wi ðk; sÞ ki ¼ ðk2 þ k C1 þ C2 Þ
i¼0
ðk2 þ k C3 þ C4 Þ ¼ 0
k2 þ k C1 ðQm ðk; sÞ; s; . . .Þ þ C2 ðQm ðk; sÞ; s; . . .Þ ¼ 0 or k2 þ k C3 ðQm ðk; sÞ;
s; . . .Þ þ C4 ðQm ðk; sÞ; s; . . .Þ ¼ 0.
X
m X
n¼5
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ; m\n ¼ 5; Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k5 ; Pn¼5 ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ kk
k¼0 k¼0
Pðk; sÞ þ Qðk; sÞ eks ¼ 0. Furthermore Pðk; sÞ; Qðk; sÞ are analytic functions of
k, for which the following requirements of the analysis (Kuang and Cong 2005;
Kuang 1993) can also be verified in the present case.
(a) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R then Pði xÞ þ Qði xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) j QðkÞ
PðkÞ j is bounded for jkj ! 1. Rek 0 no roots bifurcation from ∞.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable with
respect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ cannot have common imaginary roots.
That is for any real number x. Pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0.
X
m \5
Pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ i x5 ; Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ ik xk ; 0 k m\n ¼ 5
k¼0
ik ; i0 ¼ 1; i1 ¼ i; i2 ¼ 1; i3 ¼ i; i4 ¼ 1; Pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0
X
m\5
i x5 þ qk ðsÞ ik xk 6¼ 0; jPðix; sÞj2 ¼ x10
k¼0
" #2 " #2
X
2 X
1
2k þ 1
jQðix; sÞj2m¼4 ¼ q2k ðsÞ ð1Þ x k 2k
þ k
q2k þ 1 ðsÞ ð1Þ x
k¼0 k¼0
" #2
2 2
X
2
k
FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj jQði xÞj ¼ x 10
q2k ðsÞ ð1Þ x 2k
k¼0
" #2
X
1
k 2k þ 1
q2k þ 1 ðsÞ ð1Þ x
k¼0
X
2 X
1
q2k ðsÞ ð1Þk x2k ¼ q0 ðsÞ q2 ðsÞ x2 þ q4 ðsÞ x4 ; q2k þ 1 ðsÞ ð1Þk
k¼0 k¼0
2k þ 1
x ¼ q1 ðsÞ x q3 ðsÞ x 3
" #2
X
2
k
q2k ðsÞ ð1Þ x 2k
¼ q20 ðsÞ 2 q0 ðsÞ q2 ðsÞ x2 þ ½q22 ðsÞ þ 2 q0 ðsÞ q4 ðsÞ x4
k¼0
" #2
X
1
k 2k þ 1
q2k þ 1 ðsÞ ð1Þ x ¼ q21 ðsÞ x2 2 q1 ðsÞ q3 ðsÞ x4 þ q23 ðsÞ x6
k¼0
" #2 " #2
X2 X1
k k 2k þ 1
q2k ðsÞ ð1Þ x þ
2k
q2k þ 1 ðsÞ ð1Þ x
k¼0 k¼0
FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 ¼ q20 ðsÞ ½q21 ðsÞ 2 q0 ðsÞ q2 ðsÞ x2
½q22 ðsÞ þ 2 q0 ðsÞ q4 ðsÞ 2 q1 ðsÞ q3 ðsÞ x4
½q23 ðsÞ 2 q2 ðsÞ q4 ðsÞ x6 q24 ðsÞ x8 þ x10
P
5
Hence FðxÞ ¼ 0 implies P2k x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. QI ði x; sÞ ¼ q1 ðsÞ x q3 ðsÞ x3
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
X
m\5
Qðk; sÞ ¼ cj k j ; PðkÞ ¼ k5 ; a0 ¼ a1 ¼ a2 ¼ a3 ¼ a4 ¼ 0; a5 ¼ 1
j¼0
X
m\5
Qðk; sÞ ¼ c j k j ¼ c 0 þ c 1 k þ c 2 k2 þ c 3 k3 þ c 4 k4
j¼0
2 2 P5
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj jQði xÞj ; FðxÞ ¼ P2k x2k has at most a finite
k¼0
number of zeros. Indeed, this is a polynomial in x (degree in x10).
(d) Each positive root xðRs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; sÞ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous
and differentiable with respect to Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; s. This condition
can be assessed numerically.
@Rek
K1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ¼ Const; x 2 R þ
@s k¼ix
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin x s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos x s ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
@Q @Q
where Pk ¼ @P @P
@k ; Qk ¼ @k ; Px ¼ @x ; Qx ¼ @x , substituting k ¼ i x and bearing
@Pðk;xÞ
Pði xÞ ¼ Pði xÞ; Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ: Then @k ¼ @Pðk;xÞ @Pðk;xÞ
@½ix ¼ i@x ¼
i @Pðk;xÞ
@x
484 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
i @Pðk;xÞ @Pðk;xÞ
@k ¼ @x ; i Pk ði xÞ ¼ Px ði xÞ; i Qk ði xÞ ¼ Qx ði xÞ and that on
the surface jPði xÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 , one obtains:
w1 ðsÞ ¼ q21 ðsÞ; w3 ðsÞ ¼ 4 q1 ðsÞ q3 ðsÞ; w5 ðsÞ ¼ 3 q23 ðsÞ; QIx QI
X
3
¼ w2k1 ðsÞ x2k1
k¼1
QR QIx ¼ ½q0 ðsÞ q2 ðsÞ x2 þ q4 ðsÞ x4 ½q1 ðsÞ q3 ðsÞ 3 x2 ¼ q0 ðsÞ q1 ðsÞ
½3 q0 ðsÞ q3 ðsÞ þ q2 ðsÞ q1 ðsÞ x2 þ ½3 q3 ðsÞ q2 ðsÞ þ q4 ðsÞ q1 ðsÞ x4
3 q4 ðsÞ q3 ðsÞ x6
X
3
Fx ¼ 10 x9 2 ½ ½w2k1 ðsÞ þ 2k1 x2k1 þ 7 x7
k¼1
@q0 ðsÞ @q2 ðsÞ 2 @q4 ðsÞ 4
Fs ¼ 2 ðQRs QR þ QIs QI Þ ¼ 2 ð½ x þ x
@s @s @s
@q1 ðsÞ @q3 ðsÞ 3
½q0 ðsÞ q2 ðsÞ x2 þ q4 ðsÞ x4 þ ½ x x
@s @s
½q1 ðsÞ x q3 ðsÞ x3 Þ
X
3 X
3
Vjx¼s ¼ ðQR QIs QI QRs Þ ¼ ð f2k þ 1 x2k þ 1 g2k þ 1 ðsÞ x2k þ 1 Þ
k¼0 k¼0
X
3
2k þ 1
¼ ½g2k þ 1 ðsÞ f2k þ 1 x
k¼0
@Rek
K1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; Rs ; C1 ; L1 ; R1 ; C2 ; Rload ; Rb ; . . . ¼ const; x 2 R þ
@s k¼ix
( " #)
X3
signfK1 ðsÞg ¼ sign 10 x9 2 ½w2k1 ðsÞ þ !2k1 x2k1 þ !7 x7
k¼1
0 1
P
4
B B2k ðsÞ x2k C
B k¼0 C
signfs B 3 C þ x
@ P A
10 x9 2 ½w2k1 ðsÞ þ !2k1 x2k1 þ !7 x7
k¼1
0 1
" # P4
X3 B B 2k ðsÞ x 2k
C
B k¼0 C
f ½n2k ðsÞ A2k ðsÞ x2k A0 ðsÞ B 3 C
@ P A
k¼1 10 x9 2 ½w2k1 ðsÞ þ !2k1 x2k1 þ 7 x7
k¼1
X
3
þ ½g2k þ 1 ðsÞ f2k þ 1 x2k þ 1 g
k¼0
þ g
x10
The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally, when all Bias-T circuit parameters are
known and the stability switch due to various time delay values s is described in the
following expression:
Remark: We know Fx ðxðsÞ; sÞ ¼ 0 implies its roots xi ðsÞ and finding those
delays values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which give complex xi or
imaginary number, then unable to analyze the stability.
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 489
A PIN diode is a diode with a wide, lightly doped ‘near’ intrinsic semiconductor
region between a p-type semiconductors an n-type semiconductor region. The
p-type and n-type regions are typically heavily doped because they are used for
ohmic contacts. The wide intrinsic region is in contrast to an ordinary PN diode.
The wide intrinsic region makes the PIN diode an inferior rectifier (one typical
function of a diode). The wide intrinsic region makes the PIN diode suitable for
many applications [33,91,92]. The PIN diode suitable for many applications:
attenuators, fast switches, photo detectors and high voltage power electronics
applications. A PIN diode operates under what is known as high level injection.
PIN’s intrinsic “i” region is flooded with charge carriers from the “p” and “n”
regions. Its function can be likened to filling up a water bucket with a hole on the
side. Once the water reaches the hole’s level it will begin to pour out. A PIN diode
obeys the standard diode equation for low frequency signals. At higher frequencies,
the diode looks like an almost perfect (very linear, even for large signals) resistor.
At low frequencies, the charge can be removed and the diode turns off. At higher
frequencies, there is not enough time to remove the charge, so the diode never turns
off. The high frequency resistance is inversely proportional to the DC bias current
through the diode. A PIN diode, suitably biased, therefore acts as a variable resistor.
The high frequency resistance may vary over a wide range (from 0.1 to 10 k-ohm in
some cases; the useful range is smaller, though). The wide intrinsic region also
means the diode will have a low capacitance when reverse biased.
PIN diode fundamentals: A PIN diode is a semiconductor device that operates as
a variable resistor at RF and microwave frequencies. The resistance value of the
PIN diode is determined only by the forward biased DC current. In switch and
attenuator applications, the PIN diode should ideally control the RF signal level
without introduction distortion which might change the shape of the RF signal. An
important additional feature of the PIN diode is its ability to control large RF
signals while using much smaller level of DC excitation. A model of a PIN diode
chip is presented and the chip is prepared by starting with a wafer of almost
intrinsically pure silicon, having high resistivity and long lifetime. A P-region is
then diffused into one diode surface and an N-region is diffused into the other
surface. The resulting intrinsic or I-region thickness (W) is a function of the
thickness of the original silicon wafer.
The area of the chip (A) depends upon how many small sections are defined
from the original wafer. The performance of the PIN diode primarily depends on
chip geometry and nature of the semiconductor material in the finished diode,
490 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
area (A). Rs is slightly dependent upon area because the effective lifetime varies
with area and thickness sðA; WÞ due to edge recombination effects. Typically, PIN
diodes display a resistance characteristic consistent with this model. Resistance of
the order of 0.1 Ohm at 1A forward bias increasing to about 10000 Ohm (10Kohm)
at 1lA. The forward bias represents a realistic range for a PIN diode. The maximum
forward resistance, Rs(max), of a PIN diode is generally specified at 100 mA
forward bias current. Some PIN diodes suppliers specifies not only the Rs(max) but
also the Rs(min) at a lower forward bias current (*10 mA). It ensures a wide range
of diode resistance which is particularly important in attenuator applications. At the
lower frequencies Rs is not constant but increases as the frequency is lowered. The
normal PIN diodes which are designed to operate in RF/Microwave frequencies
exhibit this increase in Rs in the 1–10 MHz range.
A properly designed PIN will maintain constant Rs well into the 10 kHz region.
The results obtained are valid over an extremely broad frequency range. The
practical low resistance limitations result from package parasitic inductances and
junction contact resistances. Both of which are minimized in the construction of
PIN diodes. The high resistance range of PIN diodes is usually limited by the effect
of the diode capacitance (Ct). The maximum dynamic range of the PIN diode at
high frequencies, this diode reactance may have to be tuned out. The “skin effect” is
much less pronounced in relatively poor conductors such as silicon, than with good
metallic conductors. The “skin depth” is proportional to the square root of the
resistivity of the conducting material. RF signals penetrate deeply into the semi-
conductor and “skin effect” is not a significant factor in PIN diodes below X-band
frequencies. At DC and very low frequencies, the PIN diode is similar to a PN
diode. The diode resistance is described by the dynamic resistance of the I–V
characteristics at any quiescent bias point. The DC dynamic resistance point is not,
however, valid in PIN diodes at frequencies above which the period is shorter than
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 491
the transit time of the I-region. The frequency at which this occurs, fT is called
transit time frequency and may be considered the lower frequency limit. The lower
frequency limit is primarily a function of W, the I-region thickness and can be
expressed at fT = 1300/W, where W is the I-region thickness in microns.
The conductance of the diode is proportional to the stored charge and the charge
is in turn related to the diode current by Id ¼ dQ dt þ s where Id is the diode current,
d Qd
Qd is the charge stored in the diode, s is diode recombination lifetime. If the diode is
biased with only a constant current, the stored charge is constant and is equal to
Qd ¼ Id s. The PIN diode store charge equation:
Id ðtÞ ¼ dQdtd ðtÞ þ QdsðtÞ, Id ðtÞ is a function of time. First we consider the simpler
dQd ðtÞ
dQd ðtÞ Qd ðtÞ
equation Id ðtÞ ¼ 0. The equation is dt þ s ¼ 0 or dt
Qd ðtÞ ¼ 1s
Z R1 R1
dQd 1 1
¼ dt; ln Qd ¼ dt þ const; Qd ¼ e sdt þ const ¼ A e sdt ;
Qd s s
A ¼ econst
R
Is ¼ 1s dt ) dIdts ¼ 1s ; Qd ¼ A eIs ; Qd eIs ¼ A. We can see how to solve our
equation. If we differentiate equation Qd eIs ¼ A respect to time t and use
dt ¼ s , we get dt ðQd e Þ ¼ dt e þ Qd e dt ; dt ðQd e Þ ¼ e ½ dt þ Qd
dIs 1 d Is dQd Is Is dIs d Is Is dQd
can now integrate both sides of dt ðQd e Þ ¼ e Id with respect to time t to get
d Is Is
R R R
Qd eIs ¼ eIs Id dt þ const; Qd ¼ eIs eIs Id dt þ const; Is ¼ 1s dt. If we
considerRthat recombination lifetime parameter s is independent on time then
Is ¼ 1s dt ¼ 1s t þ const. If the bias consists of both a constant current and a
low frequency RF or time varying signal, then the DC component of stored charge
will be modulated by the presence of an AC component. The degree of modulation
depends on the relative level the two charge components and the frequency of the
RF signal. At signal frequency below fc ¼ 2ps 1
the RF signal has about the same
effect as the DC bias. Above fc , the modulation effect decreases. The lifetime of PIN
diodes is determined by design and is based on the desired switching speed.
Typically, diode recombination lifetime s can be in the range of 0.005 lsec to over
3 lsec. At frequencies bellow fc , the PIN diode behaves as an ordinary PN junction
diode. The RF signal incident on the diode will be rectified and considerable
distortion of the signal will occur. In the vicinity of fc , the diode begins to behave as
a linear resistor with a small nonlinear component. At frequencies well above fc , the
492 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
diode appears essentially as a pure linear resistance whose value can be controlled
by the DC or a low frequency control signal. The equivalent circuit of the PIN diode
also depends on the frequency. At frequencies much less than fc the equivalent
circuit is as shown in the below figure (normal PN junction) [24] (Fig. 4.16).
In this circuit LP is the package inductance, CP is the package
capacitance, Rs is
the series resistance, and Rj is the junction resistance Rj ¼ nkT
qIdc . Typical value for
n is 1.8 then at room temperature and Rj ¼ Idc ðmAÞ
48
. Idc is the forward DC bias current,
Cj(V) is the junction capacitance which is a function of the applied voltage. At
frequencies much higher than fc , we can draw equivalent circuit is as shown in the
below figure. LP, CP, and Rs are the same as in the low frequency equivalent circuit.
The element CI represents the I-layer capacitance which is constant and dependent
only on the geometry of the I-layer (typical values of CI are between 0.02 and 2 pF
and are dependent on diode design). The element RI represents the effective RF
resistance of the I-layer. This resistance is constant with respect to RF signal,
providing the signal frequency much higher than fc . It is variable by the DC or very
low frequency control current (Fig. 4.17).
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 493
We analyze the stability of Single Pole Single Throw (SPST)) PIN switches.
The RF switch circuit requires a few components and a very simple to implement.
Nevertheless it is able to act as an RF switch for radio frequency or RF applications
and is adequate for many applications. The RF switch circuit comprises a single
PIN diode (D1), an RF inductor or choke (Lc), a current limiting resistor or RF
choke (Ld) and a DC block capacitor (Cc). In operation, when a positive potential is
applied to the control point current, this forward biases the diode and as a result the
radio frequency signal is able to pass through the circuit. When a negative bias is
applied to the circuit, the diode become reverse biased and is effectively switched
off. Under these conditions the depletion layer in the diode becomes wide and does
not allow signal to pass. PIN diodes have a number of advantages as switches. In
the first place they are more linear than ordinary PN junction diodes. This means
that in their action as a radio frequency switch they do not create as many spurious
products. Secondly when reverse biased and switched off, the depletion layer is
wider than with an ordinary diode and this provides for greater isolation when
switching. By varying the amount of bias on the PIN diode it is possible to vary the
level of attenuation provided. In this way the circuit can be used as a very simple
RF attenuator. Although the circuit can be used as an RF attenuator, more effective
RF attenuator circuits are available for more demanding applications [92, 93]
(Fig. 4.18).
494 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
VA1 VA2 d
VA1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ; IRsource ¼ ; IRsource ¼ ICc ; ICc ¼ Cc ðVA2 VA3 Þ; VLd
Rsource dt
dIL
¼ Vd VA3 ¼ Ld d
dt
(Fig. 4.19).
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 495
We write our circuit Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL) for all nodes:
Vs ðtÞ VA2
IRsource ¼ ) Vs ðtÞ VA2 ¼ IRsource Rsource ; VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource
Rsource
Z
d 1 d 1
ICc ¼ Cc ðVA2 VA3 Þ ) ICc ¼ ðVA2 VA3 Þ; VA2 VA3 ¼ ICc dt
dt Cc dt Cc
Z Z
1 1
VA3 ¼ VA2 ICc dt; VA3 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource ICc dt
Cc Cc
Table 4.4 PIN diode attenuator and switch equivalent circuit Kirchhoff’s Current Law (KCL) for
all nodes
Node number KCL @ Ai
A2 IRsource ¼ ICc
A3 ICc þ ILd ¼ ILp þ ICp
A4 ILp ¼ IRs
A5 IRs ¼ IRI þ ICI
A6 IRI þ ICI þ ICp ¼ ILc þ IRload
496 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
Z
dIL 1 dILd
Vd VA3 ¼ Ld d ; Vd ½Vs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource ICc dt ¼ Ld
dt Cc dt
Z
d 1 d 2 I Ld
fVd ½Vs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource ICc dtg ¼ Ld
dt Cc dt2
d 2 ILd
First system differential equation: dVdts ðtÞ þ dIRsource
dt Rsource þ 1
Cc ICc ¼ Ld dt2
dILp dIL
VA3 VA4 ¼ Lp ) VA4 ¼ VA3 p ; VA4
dt dt Z
1 dIL
¼ Vs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource ICc dt p
Cc dt
dILp dIL
VA3 VA4 ¼ Lp ) VA4 ¼ VA3 Lp p ; VA4 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource
Z dt dt
1 dILp
ICc dt Lp
Cc dt
VA4 VA5
IRs ¼ ) VA4 VA5 ¼ IRs Rs ; VA5 ¼ VA4 IRs Rs
Rs
Z
1 dIL
VA5 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource ICc dt Lp p IRs Rs
Cc dt
VA5 VA6
IRI ¼ ) VA5 VA6 ¼ IRI RI ; VA6 ¼ VA5 IRI RI
RI
Z
1 dIL
VA5 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource ICc dt Lp p IRs Rs
Cc dt
VA5 VA6
IR I ¼ ) VA5 VA6 ¼ IRI RI ; VA6 ¼ VA5 IRI RI
RI
Z
1 dIL
VA6 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource ICc dt Lp p IRs Rs IRI RI
Cc dt
d VA VA6
ICI ¼ CI ðVA5 VA6 Þ; IRI ¼ 5 ) VA5 VA6 ¼ IRI RI ; ICI
dt RI
dIR
¼ CI RI I
dt
Z
d IC d 1
I Cp ¼ Cp ðVA3 VA6 Þ ) p ¼ ðVA3 VA6 Þ; VA3 VA6 ¼ ICp dt
dt Cp dt Cp
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 497
Z
1
Vs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource ICc dt fVs ðtÞ IRsource Rsource
Cc
Z
1 dI L
ICc dt Lp p
Cc dt
Z
1
IRs Rs IRI RI g ¼ ICp dt
Cp
Z
dILp 1 d dILp
Lp þ IRs Rs þ IRI RI ¼ ICp dt; Lp þ IRs Rs þ IRI RI
dt Cp dt dt
1
¼ ICp
Cp
d 2 ILp dIRs
Second system differential equation: Lp dt2 þ dt Rs þ 1
CI ICI ¼ C1p ICp
dILp
Since IRs ¼ ILp ; dIdtRs ¼ dt ; IRsource ¼ ICc ; dIRdt
source
¼ dIdtCc
dVs ðtÞ 1 1 1
Y1 ¼ 0; Y2 ¼ 0; Y3 ¼ 0; þ I ¼ 0; IC P IC I ¼ 0; IRload ¼ 0
dt Cc Cc Cp CI
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium
points of PIN diode attenuator and switch circuit in adding to coor-
dinate Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3; ICc ; ILd ; ILp ; ICp ; ICI ; ILc ; IRload arbitrarily small increments of
exponentially form ½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; iCc ; iLd ; iLp ; iCp ; iCI ; iLc ; iRload ekt and retaining the
first order terms in Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3; ICc ; ILd ; ILp ; ICp ; ICI ; ILc ; IRload . The system of
homogenous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigen-
values. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set of the below circuit
variables, circuit variables derivative and circuit variables second order derivative
with respect to time into PIN diode attenuator and switch circuit equivalent circuit.
Our PIN diode attenuator and switch circuit equivalent circuit fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; iCc ; iLd ; iLp ; iCp ; iCI ;
iLc ; iRload ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third
fixed point), etc.,
For k < 0, t > 0, the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 is
unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for k < 0, t > 0
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 499
otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the eigenvalue
parameter which is established if the fixed point is stable or unstable; additionally,
his absolute value |k| established the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point [2–4].
We can rewrite our system differential equations:
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iCc k ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt At fixed point Y1 ¼ 0 then y1 iCc k ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iLd k ekt ¼Y2 þ y2 ekt At fixed point Y2 ¼ 0 then y2 iLd k ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
iLp k ekt ¼Y3 þ y3 ekt At fixed point Y3 ¼ 0 then y3 iLp k ¼ 0
1 1 Rs
i Cp iCI y3 y3 k ¼ 0
Cp Lp CI Lp Lp
Rload ðjÞ
iLc k ekt ¼ ½IRload þ iRload ekt ; iLc k ekt
Lc
Rload ðjÞ Rload kt
¼ IRload þ iRload e
Lc Lc
ðjÞ
At fixed point RLload c
IRload ¼ 0 then iRload RLload c
i Lc k ¼ 0
PIN
diode attenuator and switch circuit
system matrix
y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; iCc ; iLd ; iLp ; iCp ; iCI ; iLc ; iRload can be constructed from the below list of
equations:
500 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
Rsource 1
y1 iCc k ¼ 0; y2 iLd k ¼ 0; y3 iLp k ¼ 0; y1 þ iCc y2 k
Ld Cc Ld
¼0
1 1 Rs Rload
i Cp iCI y3 y3 k ¼ 0; iRload iLc k ¼ 0
Cp Lp CI Lp Lp Lc
i11 ¼ k; i12 ¼ . . . ¼ i16 ¼ 0; i21 ¼ 0; i22 ¼ k; i23 ¼ 0; i24 ¼ 1; i25 ¼ i26 ¼ 0
1
i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k; i34 ¼ 0; i35 ¼ 1; i36 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ ; i42 ¼ i43 ¼ 0; i44
Cc Ld
¼ k; i45 ¼ i46 ¼ 0
Rs
i51 ¼ . . . ¼ i54 ¼ 0; i55 ¼ k ; i56 ¼ 0; i61 ¼ . . . ¼ i65 ¼ 0; i66 ¼ k; u11
Lp
¼ 1; u12 ¼ u13 ¼ u14 ¼ 0
Rsource
u21 ¼ . . . ¼ u24 ¼ 0; u31 ¼ . . . ¼ u34 ¼ 0; u41 ¼ ; u42 ¼ u43 ¼ u44 ¼ 0
Ld
1 1
u51 ¼ 0; u52 ¼ ; u53 ¼ ; u ¼ 0; u61 ¼ u62 ¼ u63 ¼ 0; u64
Cp Lp CI Lp 54
Rload
¼
Lc
We consider
4.5 PIN Diode Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 501
0 1
i Cc
B C
0 1 0 1 B i Ld C
u11 ... u14 i11 . . . i16 B C
B C
B .. .. .. C ! e; B .. .. .. C B iLp C
@ . . . A @ . . . A B C0
B y2 C
u61 u64 i61 i66 B C
By C
@ 3A
iLc
0 1 0 1
i11 . . . i16 i11 ... i16
B .. .. .. C B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A ; det(A k IÞ ¼ 0 ) det@ . . . A¼0
i61 i66 i61 i66
Exercises
1. We have amplifier system which contains BJT transistor amplifier. The amplifier
is operated as a Small Signal Amplifier. We represent our BJT transistor by
Hybrid Pi model of BJT. Our amplifier input and output matching networks are
T-type. Amplifier’s load is represented by parallel resistor (Rload) and capacitor
(Cload). We feed the amplifier by input RF source.
1:1 Draw our amplifier system by using BJT transistor linear Hybrid Pi model,
input and output block capacitors, input and output T-type matching net-
works, amplifier load circuit and input RF source.
1:2 Write our amplifier system differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability. Remark: We consider input RF source Xs ðtÞ ¼
A0 þ nðtÞ; jnðtÞj\1&A0 [ [ jnðtÞj then Xs ðtÞjA0 [ [ jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ A0 ;
dXs ðtÞjA [ [ jnðtÞj
0
dt¼ dnðtÞ
dt ! e.
1:3 How our amplifier system stability and dynamical behavior change if the
input matching network is T-type and output matching network is Pi-type?
1:4 We change our amplifier load circuit to parallel resistor (Rload) and induc-
tance (Lload). How the dynamical behavior and stability of the circuit
change? Find fixed points.
2. We have amplifier system which contains two BJT transistors amplifiers in
cascade. The amplifiers are operated as a Small Signal Amplifiers. We represent
our BJT transistors by two Hybrid Pi model of BJTs. Our first amplifier input
502 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
and output matching networks are Pi-type and second amplifier input and output
matching networks are T-type. Last amplifier’s load is represented by parallel
inductance (Lload) and capacitor (Cload). We feed the two amplifiers by input RF
source.
2:1 Draw our amplifiers system by using BJT transistors linear Hybrid Pi
models, input and output block capacitors, first and second amplifiers
matching networks, last amplifier load circuit and input RF source.
2:2 Write our amplifiers system differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability. Remark: We consider first amplifier circuit input RF source
Xs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; ; jnðtÞj\1 & A0 [ [ jnðtÞj then
dXs ðtÞj
Xs ðtÞjA0 [ [ jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ A0 ; A0 [ [ jnðtÞj
dt ¼ dnðtÞ
dt ! e
2:3 How our amplifier system stability and dynamical behavior change if the
load is pure resistive (Rload)?
2:4 How our amplifier system stability and dynamical behavior change if all
input and output matching networks are L-type?
3. We have Small Signal (SS) amplifier with PI and T’s matching networks
equivalent circuit. Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions, we replace the
BJT transistor with linear Hybrid PI model. Input matching network constructed
from two Pi-type matching networks in cascade. Output matching network can
be L-type (switch S1 position A) or PI-type (switch S1 position B).
Exercises 503
3:1 Switch S1 is in (A) position, Find circuit differential equations and fixed
points. Discuss stability of the circuit.
3:2 Switch S2 is in (B) position, Find circuit differential equations and fixed
point s. Discuss stability of the circuit.
3:3 Capacitors Ca11 and Ca12 are disconnected. How the circuit dynamical
behavior and stability is changed?
3:4 Capacitor Cm is a function of Ca11 and Ca12. Cm ¼ Ca11 C1 þ Ca12 C2
C1 ¼ a C2 ; C1 ; C2 ; a 2 R þ . How the dynamical behavior and stability of
the circuit change for different values of a parameter?
Remark: We consider amplifier circuit input RF source Xs ðtÞ ¼
A0 þ nðtÞ; jnðtÞj\1 & A0 jnðtÞj then
dXs ðtÞjA [ [ jnðtÞj
Xs ðtÞjA0 [ [ jnðtÞj ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ A0 ; 0
dt ¼ dnðtÞ
dt ! e
4. We have balanced amplifier which contains two BJT NPN transistors (Q1 and
Q2), input and output matching networks (RM1, Cc1, RM2, Cc2, RM3, Cc3, RM4,
Cc4), feedback resistor (Rf), two input RF sources (Vs1(t) and Vs2(t)), biasing
resistors (Rb1, Rc1, Rb2, Rc2), and output load (Rload)
504 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
Use BJT NPN transistor’s Small Signal (SS) Hybrid Pi equivalent circuit in your
analysis.
4:1 Find circuit differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability of the
circuit.
4:2 Resistor Rm4 is disconnected, how it influences on the circuit dynamical
behavior and stability.
4:3 We short capacitors Cc2 and Cc3. How the circuit dynamical behavior and
stability is changed?
4:4. Capacitors Cc3 and Cc4 are functions of capacitors Cc1 and Cc2.
How the dynamical behavior and stability of the circuit change for different
values of C1 and C2 parameters?
4:5 Circuit feedback resistor (Rf) is disconnected, How the dynamical behavior
and stability of the circuit is changed?
Remarks: We consider balance amplifier circuit input RF sources Vs1 ðtÞ ¼
A01 þ n1 ðtÞ; jn1 ðtÞj\1; A01 jn1 ðtÞj then Vs1 ðtÞjA01 jn1 ðtÞj ¼ A01 þ n1 ðtÞ A01 ;
dVs1 ðtÞjA [[ jn ðtÞj
01
dt
1
¼ dndt1 ðtÞ ! e; Vs2 ðtÞ ¼ A02 þ n2 ðtÞ; jn2 ðtÞj\1; A02 jn2 ðtÞj then
dVs2 ðtÞjA [[ jn ðtÞj dn2 ðtÞ
Vs2 ðtÞjA02 [[ jn2 ðtÞj ¼ A02 þ n2 ðtÞ A02 ; 02
dt
2
¼ dt !e
5. We have Common Emitter (CE) and Common Base (CB) BJT transistors
amplifier circuit. Q1 is connected as CE and Q2 is connected as CB. Common
Emitter (CE) amplifier, input signal inserted at base (B) and output signal is
taken from the collector (C). The CE amplifier’s output voltage is shifted
by *180° in phase compared to CE amplifier’s input signal. Common Base
(CB) amplifier, input signal inserted at emitter (E) and output signal taken from
the collector (C). The CB amplifier can operate as a voltage amplifier for low
input impedance.
Exercises 505
We define two circuit outputs. First circuit output (Vout1) is a voltage phase shift
by 180° and second circuit output (Vout2) has no voltage phase shift. The input RF
source is Vs(t) with serial resistor Rs and is injected to Q1 base. There are three
possible loads connections to out circuit, Rload1, Rload2, and Rload. R1, R2, R3, and
R4 are circuit biasing voltage resistors. Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions,
we replace the BJT transistors (Q1 and Q2) with linear Hybrid PI model. Switches
S1 and S2 connect the loads to our circuit. In the current circuit there are no
matching networks between the circuit amplifier and loads (Rload1, Rload2, and
Rload).
5:1 Find circuit differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability of the
circuit for the cases: (1) S1 is in position A and S2 is in position A, (2) S1 is in
position A and S2 is in position B, (3) S1 and S2 are in position B, (4) S1 is in
position B and S2 in position A.
5:2 Resistor R1 is disconnected, how it influences on the circuit dynamical
behavior and stability?
5:3 We add L—matching network between output one and Rload1. Switches S1 and
S2 are in position A. Find circuit differential equations and fixed points.
Discuss stability of the circuit.
5:4 We add PI matching network between output two and Rload2. Switches S1 and
S2 are in position A. Find circuit differential equations and fixed points.
Discuss stability of the circuit.
506 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
6. We have Bias-T circuit with 4th order filter. Bias-T’s RF choke is L2 and
capacitor is C1. We consider our 4th order filter with Bias-T feed coax cable
with RF + DC signal. The coax and the remote device which is connected to the
coax cable are taken as a pure resistive load (Rload). Due to parasitic effects of
the circuit microstrip lines there are some delay elements in time in our circuit
ðs1 ; s2 ; s3 Þ. Assumptions: The voltages on the microstrip represented delay lines
are neglected Vsi ! eði ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ and the delay is in the current that flows
through each delay line IðtÞ ! Iðt sÞ. V1—DC voltage source, V2—RF
voltage source. Tau1 $ s1 ; Tau2 $ s2 ; Tau3 $ s3
6:1 Write 4th order filter with Bias-T circuit differential Eqs.
6:2 Discuss stability and dynamical behavior of the circuit for
si ! eð¼ 0Þ 8 i ¼ 1; 2; 3. Find circuit fixed points and characteristic Eq.
6:3 Discuss stability and stability switching for si [ 0 8 i ¼ 1; 2; 3 due to dif-
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ferent values of s parameter s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s2 ; s3 ¼ s þ 1 .
6:4 How the circuit dynamical behavior changes if L3 is disconnected?
6:5 How the circuit dynamical behavior changes if we short inductor L1?
6:6. Discuss stability and stability switching for si [ 0 8(i ¼ 1; 2; 3 due )to!dif-
0 for s\s C
ferent values of s parameter s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ s2 ; s3 ¼
s3 for s sC
Exercises 507
7:1 Write VCSEL diode driving Bias-T circuit differential equations. Take into
consideration in your differential equations the full equivalent circuit of
VCSEL diode.
508 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
8. We have SPST (Single Pole Single Throw) PIN diode circuit. The output RF
port is connected to load resistance (Rload). We consider the RF source as a high
frequency signal and use PIN diode high frequency equivalent circuit. Consider
dVs ðtÞ
dt ! e
Exercises 509
9. We have SPST with series and shunt PIN didoes (D1 and D2). The output RF
port is connected to load resistance (Rload). We consider the RF source as a high
frequency signal and use PIN diode high frequency equivalent circuit. Consider
dVs ðtÞ
dt ! e.
510 4 Small Signal (SS) Amplifiers and Matching Network …
9:1 Draw PIN diodes (D1 and D2) SPST circuit equivalent circuit.
9:2 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
9:3 Find circuit eigenvalues expressions and discuss stability switching for
parameters variation.
9:4 Inductor Ls is disconnected, How the circuit dynamic changes? Find circuit
differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
9:5 We disconnect diode D2, How the circuit dynamic changes? Find circuit
differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
10. We have high isolation generic PIN SPST circuit. PIN diode switches can
handle very large power signals. The important diode parameters for switches
that must handle power levels higher than 1 w include the diode’s voltage
rating and thermal resistance. Other diode parameters, such as series resistance,
capacitance and I layer thickness, are also contributing factors to the determi-
nation of maximum power handling. We inject the RF signal (Vs(t)) through
circuit RF common port and can switch it to RF Out1 or RF Out1. We have two
bias voltage sources to our circuit (Vss1 and Vss2). Circuit RF chokes are Ld1,
Ld2, and Ld3. Three Cblock capacitors (Cb1, Cb2, and Cb3). Two Cfilter capacitors
(Cf1 and Cf2). Two PIN diodes are low capacitance and the other two PIN
diodes are low resistance. Rload1 and Rload2 are our circuit’s load resistances.
We consider for simplicity dVdts ðtÞ ! e. Circuit PIN diodes parameters are not the
Exercises 511
same and there is slightly differences. Use PIN diode high frequency equivalent
circuit in your analysis.
Generally, large signal or Power Amplifier (PA) are used in the output stages of
audio amplifier systems to derive a loudspeaker load. Power amplifier must be able
to supply the high peak currents required to drive the low impedance speaker. One
method used to distinguish the electrical characteristics of different types of
amplifiers is by “class”, and as such amplifiers are classified according to their
circuit configuration and method of operation. Then Amplifier Classes is the term
used to differentiate between the different amplifier types. Amplifier Classes rep-
resent the amount of the output signal which varies within the amplifier circuit over
one cycle of operation when excited by a sinusoidal input signal. The classification
of amplifiers range from entirely linear operation (for use in high-fidelity signal
amplification) with very low efficiency, to entirely non-linear (where a faithful
signal reproduction is not so important) operation but with a much higher effi-
ciency, while others are a compromise between the two. Amplifier classes are
mainly lumped into two basic groups. The first are the classically controlled con-
duction angle amplifiers forming the more common amplifier classes of A, B, AB
and C, which are defined by the length of their conduction state over some portion
of the output waveform, such that the output stage transistor operation lies some-
where between being “fully-ON” and “fully-OFF”. The second set of amplifiers are
the newer so-called “switching” amplifier classes of D, E, F, G, S, T etc., which use
digital circuits and pulse width modulation (PWM) to constantly switch the signal
between “fully-ON” and “fully-OFF” driving the output hard into the transistors
saturation and cut-off regions. The most commonly constructed amplifier classes are
those that are used as audio amplifiers, mainly class A, B, AB and C. Class A
Amplifiers are the most common type of amplifier class due mainly to their simple
design. Class A, literally means “the best class” of amplifier due mainly to their low
signal distortion levels and are probably the best sounding of all the amplifier
classes mentioned here. The class A amplifier has the highest linearity over the
other amplifier classes and as such operates in the linear portion of the character-
istics curve. Class B amplifiers were invented as a solution to the efficiency and
heating problems associated with the previous class A amplifier. The basic class B
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 513
O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_5
514 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
amplifier uses two complimentary transistors either bipolar of FET for each half of
the waveform with its output stage configured in a “push-pull” type arrangement, so
that each transistor device amplifies only half of the output waveform. Class AB
Amplifier is a combination of the “Class A” and the “Class B” type amplifiers.
The AB classification of amplifier is currently one of the most common used types
of audio power amplifier design. The class AB amplifier is a variation of a class B
amplifier, except that both devices are allowed to conduct at the same time around
the waveforms crossover point eliminating the crossover distortion problems of the
previous class B amplifier. The Class C Amplifier design has the greatest efficiency
but the poorest linearity of the classes of amplifiers mentioned here. The previous
classes, A, B and AB are considered linear amplifiers, as the output signals
amplitude and phase are linearly related to the input signals amplitude and phase.
Class C amplifier is heavily biased so that the output current is zero for more than
one half of an input sinusoidal signal cycle with the transistor idling at its cut-off
point. The conduction angle for the transistor is significantly less than 180°, and is
generally around the 90° area. We analyse the stability of these amplifiers by
inspecting the equivalent circuit differential equations, fixed points, bifurcation and
stability switching for circuit parameters variation. BJT transistor is replaced by
large signal model in our analysis.
We use in our analysis the Bipolar transistor model for large signal circuit
simulation: The BJT model used in circuit simulation can accurately represent the
DC and dynamic currents of the transistor in response to VBE(t) and VCE(t).
A typical circuit simulation model or compact model is made of the Ebers-Moll
model when VBE and VBC are two driving forces for IC and IB, plus additional
enhancements for high level injection, voltage dependent capacitances that accu-
rately represent the charge storage in the transistor, and parasitic resistances.
This BJT model is known as the Gummel-Poon model. The Ebers-Moll BJT model
is a good large signal. if the inputs/outputs exceed certain limits, the full Ebers-Moll
model must be used. When certain parameters are omitted, the Gummel–Poon
model reduces to the simpler Ebers–Moll model. Gummel-Poon nonlinear model is
the “large signal model”. Large signal models is closer to reality but is computa-
tionally complex or even intractable. Additionally we discuss the stability of
wideband LNA with negative feedback.
Vcc VB1 VB d
ICQ1 þ IBQ1 ¼ IEQ1 ; IEQ2 ¼ ICQ2 þ IBQ2 ; IR1 ¼ ; IR2 ¼ 2 ; IC1 ¼ C1 ðVA1 VB1 Þ
R1 R2 dt
d Isc
IC2 ¼ C2 ðVA1 VB2 Þ; IRs ¼ IC1 þ IC2 ; IR1 þ IC1 ¼ IBQ1 þ ID1 ¼ IBQ1 þ ID ; lnð Þ 0
dt Ise
V A3 Vs ðtÞ VA1
ID2 þ IC2 þ IBQ2 ¼ IR2 ; IRload ¼ ; VECQ2 ¼ VA3 ; VCEQ1 þ VECQ2 ¼ Vcc ; IRs ¼
Rload Rs
Collector emitter voltage expression for BJT NPN and PNP transistor
we can write the following circuit collector emitter equations for Q1 and Q2:
af bf
bf : 20 ! 500; bf ¼ ; af ¼ ; af : 0:95 ! 0:99; bf [ br
1 af 1 þ bf
ar br
br : 0 ! 20; br ¼ ; ar ¼ ; ar : 0 ! 0:95; af [ ar
1 ar 1 þ br
IEQ1
IEQ1 ¼ ðbf þ 1Þ IBQ1 þ ðbf þ 1Þ ICBQ1 0 ; IBQ1 ¼ ICBQ1 0
ðbf þ 1Þ
IEQ2
IEQ2 ¼ ðbf þ 1Þ IBQ2 þ ðbf þ 1Þ ICBQ2 0 ; IBQ2 ¼ ICBQ2 0
ðbf þ 1Þ
bf IEQ1 bf IEQ2
ICQ1 ¼ þ ICBQ1 0 ; ICQ2 ¼ þ ICBQ2 0
ðbf þ 1Þ ðbf þ 1Þ
Vcc VB1 VB
IR1 ¼ ) IR1 R1 ¼ Vcc VB1 ; VB1 ¼ Vcc IR1 R1 ; IR2 ¼ 2 ) VB2
R1 R2
¼ IR2 R2
Z
d 1
IC1 ¼ C1 ðVA1 VB1 Þ ) VA1 VB1 ¼ IC1 dt;
dt C1
Z
1
VA1 ¼ VB1 þ IC1 dt
C1
Z Z
d 1 1
IC1 ¼ C1 ðVA1 VB1 Þ ) VA1 VB1 ¼ IC1 dt; VA1 ¼ VB1 þ IC1 dt
dt C1 C1
Z Z
d 1 1
IC2 ¼ C2 ðVA1 VB2 Þ ) VA1 VB2 ¼ IC2 dt; VA1 ¼ VB2 þ IC2 dt
dt C2 C2
Z Z
1 1
VB 1 þ IC1 dt ¼ VB2 þ IC2 dt;
C1 C2
Z Z
1 1
Vcc IR1 R1 þ IC1 dt ¼ IR2 R2 þ IC2 dt
C1 C2
Z Z
d 1 d 1
fVcc IR1 R1 þ IC1 dtg ¼ fIR R2 þ IC2 dtg
dt C1 dt 2 C2
VA3
IRload ¼ ) VA3 ¼ IRload Rload ; VA3 ¼ VECQ2
Rload
ar ICQ2 IEQ2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
¼ VT lnf g
ICQ2 af IEQ2 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power … 519
We add one equation to the other and get the following expression:
ðÞ IR1 ¼ IBQ1 þ ID IC1 ; ðÞ IR2 ¼ ID þ IC2 þ IBQ2 ; ðÞ þ ðÞ ) IR1 þ IR2
¼ IBQ1 þ IBQ2 þ IC2 IC1 þ 2 ID
X
2 X
2
dIR1 dIR2
I C2 I C1 ¼ IR k IBQk 2 ID ; ð R1 þ R2 Þ
k¼1 k¼1
dt dt
1 X 2 X2
¼ ð IRk IBQk 2 ID Þ
C k¼1 k¼1
ID
Vcc ¼ IR1 R1 þ 2 lnð þ 1Þ þ IR2 R2 ;
I0
1
ID ¼ I0 fexp½ ðVcc IR1 R1 IR2 R2 Þ 1g
2
dIR1 dIR2 1 X 2 X 2
ð R1 þ R2 Þ ¼ ð IRk IBQk 2 I0
dt dt C k¼1 k¼1
1
fexp½ ðVcc IR1 R1 IR2 R2 Þ 1gÞ
2
520 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
b I
VT ar ½ðbf þEQ1Þ2 þ ICBQ2 0 IEQ2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
n1 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ lnf b IEQ f g
Rload f 2
þ ICBQ 0 af IEQ þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
ðbf þ 1Þ 2 2
IEQ1 þ IEQ2 ¼ 0
b IEQ1
ar ½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0 IEQ1 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
f þ 1Þ
ln½f b I
g
½ðbf þEQ1Þ1 þ ICBQ1 0 af IEQ1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
f
b IEQ2
ar ½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0 IEQ2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise Vcc
f þ 1Þ
f b I
g ¼
½ðbf þEQ1Þ2 þ ICBQ2 0 af IEQ2 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc VT
f
b IEQ1
ar ½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0 IEQ1 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
½VVcc f þ 1Þ
e T ¼f b I
g
½ðbf þEQ1Þ1 þ ICBQ1 0 af IEQ1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
f
b IEQ2
ar ½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0 IEQ2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
f þ 1Þ
f b I
g
½ðbf þEQ1Þ2 þ ICBQ2 0 af IEQ2 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
f
5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power … 521
b IEQ1
ar ½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0 IEQ1 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
f þ 1Þ
n2 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ f b I
g
½ðbf þEQ1Þ1 þ ICBQ1 0 af IEQ1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
f
b IEQ2
ar ½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0 IEQ2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
f þ 1Þ
f b I
g;
½ðbf þEQ1Þ2 þ ICBQ2 0 af IEQ2 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
f
n2 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ e½ VT
Vcc
½Vcc
n1 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ 0; n2 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ e VT
bf bf
1; af : 0:95 ! 0:99; af 1; ð af Þ ! e ! 0; X ðar ; bf Þ
ðbf þ 1Þ ðbf þ 1Þ
ar bf
¼ 1
ðbf þ 1Þ
a b
VT ððb r þ f1Þ 1Þ IEQ2 þ ar ICBQ2 0 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
n1 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ lnf f b g
Rload ð f af Þ IEQ þ ICBQ 0 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
ðbf þ 1Þ 2 2
IEQ1 þ IEQ2 ¼ 0
a b
VT ððb r þ f1Þ 1Þ IEQ2 þ ar ICBQ2 0 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
n1 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ lnf f g
Rload ICBQ2 0 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
IEQ1 þ IEQ2 ¼ 0
Rnload
X1 ðIEQ IEQ Þn
Rload 1 2 VTn
expfðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ g¼
VT n¼0
n!
R2load R3load
Rload ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ2 VT2
ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ3 VT3
¼ 1 þ ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ þ þ þ
VT 2 6
R2load
Rload Rload ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ2 VT2
expfðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ g 1 þ ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ þ
VT VT 2
R2
Rload ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ2 Vload
2
1 þ ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ þ T
VT 2
Xðar ; bf Þ IEQ2 þ C1 ðar ; af ; Ise ; ICBQ2 0 Þ
C2 ðar ; af ; Isc ; ICBQ2 0 Þ
R2
ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ2 load
V2
ðÞ 1 þ ðIEQ1 IEQ2 Þ Rload
VT þ 2
T
CX2 IEQ2 þ C1
C2
b IEQ1
ar ½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0 IEQ1 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
f þ 1Þ
n2 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ f b IEQ1
g
½ðbf þ ICBQ1 0 af IEQ1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
f þ 1Þ
b IEQ2
ar ½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0 IEQ2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
f þ 1Þ
f b IEQ2
g;
½ðbf þ ICBQ2 0 af IEQ2 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
f þ 1Þ
n2 ðIEQ1 ; IEQ2 Þ ¼ e½ VT
Vcc
bf
ðar ðb þ 1Þ 1Þ IEQ1 þ ar ICBQ1 0 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
f bf
f
g
ððb þ 1Þ af Þ IEQ1 þ ICBQ1 0 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
f
bf
ðar ðb þ 1Þ 1Þ IEQ2 þ ar ICBQ2 0 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
¼ e½ VT
Vcc
f f
bf
g
ððb þ 1Þ af Þ IEQ2 þ ICBQ2 0 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
f
Assumptions:
bf bf
ððb þ 1Þ af Þ ! e; X ¼ ar ðb þ 1Þ 1; C3 ¼ ar ICBQ1 0 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
f f
1 C4 C2 e½ VT
Vcc
IEQ1 ¼ ð C3 Þ
X X IEQ2 þ C1
1 C4 C2 e½ VT
Vcc
Rload
1þð ð C3 Þ IEQ2 Þ
X X IEQ2 þ C1 VT
V
½ cc
2 e T
R2load
ðX1 ðCXI4 C
V
EQ þ C1
C3 Þ IEQ2 Þ2 VT2 X C1
þ 2
IEQ2 þ
2 C2 C2
C4 C2 Rload e½ VT C4 C2 e½ VT
Vcc Vcc
Rload C3 Rload
IEQ2 þ1 þ ð½ 2 IEQ2 2
X VT IEQ2 þ X C1 VT
2 VT X VT X IEQ2 þ X C1
C4 C2 e½ VT
Vcc
C3 C3 R2 X C1
þ ½ 2 2 ½ 2 IEQ2 Þ load2 IEQ2 þ
X X X IEQ2 þ X C1 2 VT C 2 C2
C4 C2 Rload e½ VT
Vcc
Rload C3 Rload
IEQ2 þ1
X2 VT IEQ2 þ X C1 VT VT X VT
C24 C22 e2½ VT C4 C2 e½ VT
Vcc Vcc
þð þ IEQ
2
2 IEQ2
½X2 IEQ2 þ X C1 2 2
½X2 IEQ2 þ X C1
½Vcc
C3 C3 C4 C2 e VT R2 X C1
þ ½ 2 2 ½ 2 IEQ2 Þ load2 IEQ2 þ
X X X IEQ2 þ X C1 2 VT C2 C2
524 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
C4 C2 Rload e½ VT
Vcc
Rload C3 Rload
IEQ2 þ1
X VT IEQ2 þ X C1 VT
2 V T X VT
C24 C22 e2½ VT 2V C4 C2 e½ VT 2V
Vcc
R2
load load
Vcc
R2
2 R2load 2
þ T
þ IEQ
2
2 2 T
IEQ2
½X2 IEQ2 þ X C1 2 2
2 VT2 ½X IEQ2 þ X C1
½Vcc R2
C3 C4 C2 e T 2VT2
load
C3 X C1
V
R2 R2
þ ½ 2 load2 2 ½ 2 IEQ2 load2 IEQ2 þ
X 2 VT X X IEQ2 þ X C1 2 VT C2 C2
C4 C2 Rload e½ VT
Vcc
C3 R2load Rload X R2
þ IEQ2 ½2 þ IEQ
2
load2
X VT IEQ2 þ X C1 VT
2 X 2 VT 2 VT C2 2
2 VT
C24 C22 e2½ VT 2V ½V
Vcc
R2 Vcc
R2
C3 C4 C2 e T 2VT2
load load
2
þ 2 2 ð T
Þ
½X IEQ2 þ X C1 2 X X2 IEQ2 þ X C1
½Vcc R2
C4 C2 e VT 2V
load
2 C1 C3 R2 C3 Rload
2 T
IEQ2 ½ 2 load2 þ 1
½X IEQ2 þ X C1
2 C2 X 2 VT X VT
The above equation can be solve numerically and we get some options for IEQ2
values. We ignore complex and negative values [33].
C1 C3 R2 C3 Rload
w1 ðIEQ2 Þ ½ 2 load2 þ 1;
C2 X 2 VT X VT
IEQ2 ¼ fn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .
½Vcc
1 C4 C2 e VT
IEQ1 ¼ ð C3 Þ;
X X fn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ þ C1
IEQ1 ¼ gn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ
Summary: We get some options for IEQ1 ; IEQ2 values, and ignore negative and
complex results.
IEQ1 ¼ gn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ;
IEQ2 ¼ fn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .
dIR1 dIR2 1 X 2 X2
ð R1 þ R2 Þ ¼ ð IRk IBQk 2 I0
dt dt C k¼1 k¼1
1
fexp½ ðVcc IR1 R1 IR2 R2 Þ 1gÞ
2
5.1 Class AB Push-Pull Power … 525
dIR1 dIR2 1 X 2 X2
1 X2
ð þ ÞR¼ ð IRk IBQk 2 I0 fexp½ ðVcc R IRk Þ
dt dt C k¼1 k¼1
2 k¼1
1gÞ
X
2
dX X 2
dIRk
X¼ IRk ; ¼
k¼1
dt k¼1
dt
X
2
gn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ fn ðC1 ; . . .; C4 ; X; Rload ; VT ; . . .Þ
IBQk ¼ þ
k¼1
ðbf þ 1Þ ðbf þ 1Þ
X2
ICBQk 0
k¼1
X
2
gn þ f n X
2
IBQk ¼ ICBQk 0 ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .
k¼1
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
X
2
dIR 1 X 2
gn þ f n X2
R k
¼ ð IR k þ ICBQk 0 2 I0
k¼1
dt C k¼1 ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
1 X2
fexp½ ðVcc R IRk Þ 1gÞ
2 k¼1
dX 1 gn þ f n X2
1
¼ ðX þ ICBQk 0 2 I0 fexp½ ðVcc R XÞ 1gÞ
dt CR ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
2
gn þ fn X2
1
X ðjÞ þ ICBQk 0 2 I0 fexp½ ðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ 1g ¼ 0;
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
2
j ¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .
1 gn þ fn X
2
X ðjÞ 2 I0 fexp½ ðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ 1g ¼ ICBQk 0
2 ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
1 gn þ fn X
2
X ðjÞ 2 I0 fexp½ ðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ 1g ¼ ICBQk 0
2 ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
X1 1 ðjÞ n
1 2n ðVcc R X Þ
exp½ ðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ ¼
2 n¼0
n!
1 1
¼ 1þ ðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ þ ðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ2 þ
2 8
1 1 1
exp½ ðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ 1 þ ðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ þ ðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ2
2 2 8
1 gn þ f n X
2
X ðjÞ I0 fðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ þ ðVcc R X ðjÞ Þ2 g ¼ ICBQk 0
4 ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
1
ð1 þ I0 RÞ X ðjÞ I0 Vcc I0 ½Vcc
2
2 Vcc R X ðjÞ þ R2 ½X ðjÞ 2
4
gn þ fn X2
¼ ICBQk 0
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
1 1
I0 R2 ½X ðjÞ 2 ð1 þ I0 R þ I0 Vcc RÞ X ðjÞ
4 2
1 gn þ f n X
2
þ ½I0 Vcc þ I0 Vcc 2
þ ICBQk 0 ¼ 0
4 ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
u 1 2
u ð1 þ I0 R þ I0 Vcc RÞ
u 2
ð1 þ I0 R þ 12 I0 Vcc RÞ u
u X
t I0 R2 ½I0 Vcc þ 1 I0 V 2 þ gn þ fn
2
ICBQk 0
4 cc
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
X ðjÞ ¼ 1
2 I0 R2
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
u 1 2
u ð1 þ I0 R þ I0 Vcc RÞ
u 2
u
ð1 þ I0 R þ 2 I0 Vcc RÞ þ u
1
X
t I0 R2 ½I0 Vcc þ 1 I0 V 2 þ gn þ fn
2
ICBQk 0
4 cc
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
ðjÞ
Xgroup ¼
1 1
2 I0 R2
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
u 1 2
u ð1 þ I0 R þ I0 Vcc RÞ
u 2
ð1 þ I0 R þ 12 I0 Vcc RÞ u
u X
t I0 R2 ½I0 Vcc þ 1 I0 V 2 þ gn þ fn
2
ICBQk 0
4 cc
ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
ðjÞ
Xgroup ¼
2 1
2 I0 R2
We ignore in our analysis negative and complex fixed points values. We get a set
of one dimension systems dXdt ¼ nn ðXÞ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .
1 g n þ fn X2
1
nn ðXÞ ¼ ðX þ ICBQk 0 2 I0 fexp½ ðVcc R XÞ 1gÞ
CR ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
2
dX 1 gn þ f n X2
1
¼ ðX þ ICBQk 0 2 I0 fexp½ ðVcc R XÞ 1gÞ
dt CR ðbf þ 1Þ k¼1
2
We can draw the graphs nn ðXÞ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . . and then use it to sketch the vector
fields on the real line. A fluid is flowing along the real line with a local velocities
nn ðXÞ. This imaginary fluid is called the phase fluid of our class AB push-pull
amplifier system, and the real line is the phase space. The flow is to the right where
nn ðXÞ [ 0 and to the left where nn ðXÞ\0. To find the solutions to dX dt ¼ nn ðXÞ; n ¼
1; 2; . . . starting from an arbitrary initial condition X0 As time goes, the phase point
moves along the X-axis according to some functions nn ðXÞ; n ¼ 1; 2; . . . This
function is called the trajectory based at X0 , and it represents the solutions of the
differential equation starting from the initial conditions X0 . A picture which shows
all the qualitatively different trajectories of our class AB push-pull amplifier system,
is called a phase portrait. The appearance of the phase portrait is controlled by the
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
fixed points Xgroup1 or Xgroup2 ; j ¼ 0; 1; . . ., defined by nn ðXgroup1 Þ ¼ 0;
ðjÞ
nn ðXgroup2 Þ ¼ 0; n ¼ 1; 2; . . .; they correspond to stagnation points of the flow. Our
system fixed points represent equilibrium solutions (steady state, constant, rest
ðjÞ ðjÞ
solutions), since if X ¼ Xgroup1 or X ¼ Xgroup2 ; j ¼ 0; 1; . . . initially, then XðtÞ ¼
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Xgroup1 or XðtÞ ¼ Xgroup2 ; j ¼ 0; 1; . . . for all time. An class AB push-pull amplifier
system equilibrium is defined to be stable if all sufficiently small disturbances away
from it damp out in time. Stable system equilibria are represented geometrically by
528 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
The Class C Amplifier design has the greatest efficiency but the poorest linearity of
the classes of amplifiers. The class C amplifier is heavily biased so that the output
current is zero for more than one half of an input sinusoidal signal cycle with the
transistor idling at its cut-off point. Due to its heavy audio distortion, class C
amplifiers are commonly used in high frequency sine wave oscillators and certain
types of radio frequency amplifiers. The class C amplifier conduction angle is
slightly less than 180°. The most common application of the Class C amplifier is the
RF (radio frequency) circuits like RF oscillator, RF amplifier etc. where there are
additional tuned circuits for retrieving the original input signal from the pulsed
output of the Class C amplifier and so the distortion caused by the amplifier has
little effect on the final output. Biasing resistor Rb pulls the base of Q1 further
downwards and the Q-point will be set some way below the cut-off point in the DC
load line. As a result the transistor will start conducting only after the input signal
amplitude has risen above the base emitter voltage (Vbe * 0.7 V) plus the
downward bias voltage caused by Rb. That is the reason why the major portion of
the input signal is absent in the output signal. Inductor L1 and capacitor C1 forms a
tank circuit which aids in the extraction of the required signal from the pulsed
output of the transistor. Class C operation means that the collector current flows for
less than 180° of the ac cycle. This implies that the collector current of a class C
amplifier is highly non-sinusoidal because current flows in pulses. To avoid dis-
tortion, class C amplifier makes use of a resonant tank circuit. This results in a
sinusoidal output voltage. Actual job of the active element (transistor Q1) here is to
produce a series of current pulses according to the input and make it flow through
the resonant circuit. Values of L1 and C1 are so selected that the resonant circuit
oscillates in the frequency of the input signal. Since the resonant circuit oscillates in
one frequency (generally the carrier frequency) all other frequencies are attenuated
and the required frequency can be squeezed out using a suitably tuned load.
Harmonics or noise present in the output signal can be eliminated using additional
filters. A coupling transformer can be used for transferring the power to the
load. The Class C amplifier has high efficiency and it is excellent in RF applications
[24–26] (Fig. 5.3).
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 529
Inductor L1 and capacitor C1 forms a tank circuit which aids in the extraction of
the required signal from the pulsed output of the transistor. Class C operation means
that the collector current flows for less than 180° of the ac cycle. This implies that
the collector current of a class C amplifier is highly non-sinusoidal because current
flows in pulses. To avoid distortion, class C amplifier makes use of a resonant tank
circuit. This results in a sinusoidal output voltage. Actual job of the active element
(transistor Q1) here is to produce a series of current pulses according to the input
and make it flow through the resonant circuit. Values of L1 and C1 are so selected
that the resonant circuit oscillates in the frequency of the input signal. Since the
resonant circuit oscillates in one frequency (generally the carrier frequency) all
other frequencies are attenuated and the required frequency can be squeezed out
using a suitably tuned load. Harmonics or noise present in the output signal can be
eliminated using additional filters. A coupling transformer can be used for trans-
ferring the power to the load. The Class C amplifier has high efficiency and it is
excellent in RF applications.
Since the input RF signal is a large signal we use in our analysis the Ebers-Moll
BJT model for Q1. The Ebers-Moll BJT model is a good large signal, steady state
model of the transistor and allows the state of conduction of the device to be easily
determined for different modes of operation of the device. The different modes of
operation are determined by the manner in which the junctions are biased [91–93]
(Fig. 5.4).
530 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
Vs ðtÞ VA1 d
ICQ1 þ IBQ1 ¼ IEQ1 ; IRs ¼ ; ICin ¼ Cin ðVA1 VA2 Þ; IRs ¼ ICin ; ICin
Rs dt
¼ IBQ1 þ IRb
Z Z
1 1
VA1 ¼ VA2 þ ICin dt; Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs ¼ VA2 þ ICin dt;
Cin Cin
Z
1
VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs ICin dt
Cin
VA2
IRb ¼ ) VA2 ¼ IRb Rb ; IRb Rb
Rb
Z
1
¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs ICin dt; VCEQ1 ¼ VA3
Cin
Z
d 1
fIRb Rb ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs ICin dtg;
dt Cin
dIRb dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1
Rb ¼ Rs ICin
dt dt dt Cin
dIL d d 2 IL
Vcc VA3 ¼ L1 1 ; IC1 ¼ C1 ðVcc VA3 Þ; IC1 ¼ C1 L1 2 1
dt dt dt
Z
d 1
ICout ¼ Cout ðVA3 VA4 Þ ) VA3 VA4 ¼ ICout dt; VA3 IRload Rload
dt
Z Cout
1
¼ ICout dt
Cout
dICQ1 dIEQ1
ðar Þ ½ICQ1 af IEQ1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
dt dt
dICQ1 dIEQ1
ð af Þ ½ar ICQ1 IEQ1 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
VT f dt dt g
½ICQ1 af IEQ1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
½ar ICQ1 IEQ1 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
dIRload 1
¼ Rload þ ICout
dt Cout
dICQ1 dIEQ1
ðar Þ ½ICQ1 af IEQ1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
dt dt
dICQ1 dIEQ1
ð af Þ ½ar ICQ1 IEQ1 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
ICout ¼ IRload ; VT f dt dt g
½ICQ1 af IEQ1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
½ar ICQ1 IEQ1 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
dICout 1
¼ Rload þ ICout
dt Cout
d 2 IL1
We can summary our equations: IRs ¼ ICin ; IC1 ¼ C1 L1 dt2
d 2 I L1
ICQ1 af IEQ1 ¼ ð1 af Þ IL1 þ ð1 af Þ C1 L1 þ ðaf 1Þ ICout af
dt2
ICin þ af IRb
d 2 I L1
ar ICQ1 IEQ1 ¼ ðar 1Þ IL1 þ ðar 1Þ C1 L1 þ ð1 ar Þ ICout
dt2
ICin þ IRb
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 533
dY4
½ðar 1Þ C1 L1 þ g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
dt
dY4
½ð1 af Þ C1 L1 þ g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
VT f dt g
½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
1
¼ Y2 Rload þ ICout
Cout
dY4
½ðar 1Þ C1 L1 þ g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
dt
dY4
½ð1 af Þ C1 L1 þ g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
dt
1 1
¼ ½Y2 Rload þ ICout ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
VT Cout
dY4
fðar 1Þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ð1 af Þ ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise g C1 L1
dt
1 1
¼ ½Y2 Rload þ ICout ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
VT Cout
g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 535
1 1
½Y2 Rload þ ICout ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
VT Cout
dY4 g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
¼
dt fðar 1Þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ð1 af Þ ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise g C1 L1
The first stage is to find our system fixed points: It is done by letting
dY4
¼ 0 ) fðar 1Þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ð1 af Þ
dt
½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise g C1 L1 6¼ 0
C1 L1 6¼ 0 ) ðar 1Þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ð1 af Þ
½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise 6¼ 0
1 1
I ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
VT Cout Cout
g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise ¼ 0
536 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
a
Assumption dVdts ðtÞ ! e; g3 ¼ Cin1Rb IC in ; g4 ¼ Cin R f
b
ICin
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the class C power amplifier equivalent circuit consists in
adding to coordinate ½IL1 ; IRb ; IRload ; ICout ; ICin ; Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 arbitrarily small incre-
ments of exponentially form ½iL1 ; iRb ; iRload ; iCout ; iCin ; y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ekt and retaining
the first order terms in IL1 ; IRb ; IRload ; ICout ; ICin ; Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 . The system of
homogenous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigen-
values [4]. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set of the below
circuit variables, circuit variables derivative and circuit variables second order
derivative with respect to time into class C power amplifier [2–4]. Our class C
power amplifier equivalent circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of
exponential form ½iL1 ; iRb ; iRload ; iCout ; iCin ; y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed
point), j = 1 (second fixed point), j = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
ðjÞ Rs 1 ðjÞ
iRb k ekt ¼ ½Y1 þ y1 ekt ½I þ iCin ekt
Rb Cin Rb Cin
ðjÞ Rs 1 ðjÞ Rs 1
iRb k ekt ¼ Y1 ICin y1 ekt iCin ekt
Rb Cin Rb Rb Cin Rb
ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point Y1 RRbs C1in Rb ICin ¼ 0: iRb k y1 RRbs iCin C1in Rb ¼ 0
ðjÞ ðjÞ
g1 ðIL1 ðtÞ; Y4 ðtÞ; ICout ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; IRb ðtÞÞ ¼ ð1 af Þ IL1 þ ð1 af Þ C1 L1 Y4
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ðaf 1Þ ICout af ICin þ af IRb þ iL1 ð1 af Þ ekt þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 ekt
þ iCout ðaf 1Þ ekt iCin af ekt þ iRb af ekt
At fixed point:
ðjÞ ðjÞ
g1 ¼ g1 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; IC out ; IC in ; IRb Þ ¼ ð1 af Þ IL1 þ ð1 af Þ C1 L1 Y4
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ðaf 1Þ ICout af ICin þ af IRb
g1 ðtÞ ¼ g1 ðIL1 ðtÞ; Y4 ðtÞ; ICout ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; IRb ðtÞÞ ¼ g1 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; IC out ; IC in ; IRb Þ þ iL1 ð1 af Þ ekt
þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 ekt þ iCout ðaf 1Þ ekt iCin af ekt þ iRb af ekt
ðjÞ
g2 ðIL1 ðtÞ; Y4 ðtÞ; ICout ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; IRb ðtÞÞ ¼ ðar 1Þ IL1 þ iL1 ðar 1Þ ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ðar 1Þ C1 L1 Y4 þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1 ekt þ ð1 ar Þ ICout
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ iCout ð1 ar Þ ekt ICin iCin ekt þ IRb þ iRb ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
g2 ðIL1 ðtÞ; Y4 ðtÞ; ICout ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; IRb ðtÞÞ ¼ ðar 1Þ IL1 þ ðar 1Þ C1 L1 Y4
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ð1 ar Þ ICout ICin þ IRb þ iL1 ðar 1Þ ekt þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1 ekt
þ iCout ð1 ar Þ ekt iCin ekt þ iRb ekt
ðjÞ ðjÞ
g2 ¼ g2 ðIL1 ; Y4 ; IC out ; IC in ; IRb Þ ¼ ðar 1Þ IL1 þ ðar 1Þ C1 L1 Y4
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ð1 ar Þ ICout ICin þ IRb ¼ 0
dVs ðtÞ
g3 ðY3 ðtÞ; Y2 ðtÞ; Y1 ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; Þ ¼ g3 þ y3 ðar 1Þ ekt þ y2 ð1 ar Þ ekt
dt
Rs 1 1 dVs ðtÞ dVs ðtÞ
y1 ð1 þ Þ ekt iCin ekt þ ; !e
Rb Cin Rb Rb dt dt
dVs ðtÞ Rs 1
g3 ð ! eÞ ¼ g3 þ ½y3 ðar 1Þ þ y2 ð1 ar Þ y1 ð1 þ Þ iCin ekt
dt Rb Cin Rb
dVs ðtÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
g4 ðY3 ðtÞ; Y2 ðtÞ; Y1 ðtÞ; ICin ; Þ ¼ ð1 af Þ ½Y3 þ y3 ekt þ ðaf 1Þ ½Y2 þ y2 ekt
dt
ðjÞ Rs af dVs ðtÞ af ðjÞ
½Y1 þ y1 ekt af ð1 þ Þ þ ½I þ iCin ekt
Rb Rb dt Cin Rb Cin
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 539
dVs ðtÞ
g4 ðY3 ðtÞ; Y2 ðtÞ; Y1 ðtÞ; ICin ðtÞ; Þ ¼ g4 þ y3 ð1 af Þ ekt þ y2 ðaf 1Þ ekt
dt
Rs af af dVs ðtÞ dVs ðtÞ
y1 af ð1 þ Þ ekt iCin ekt þ ; !e
Rb Cin Rb Rb dt dt
dVs ðtÞ
g4 ð ! eÞ
dt
Rs af
¼ g4 þ ½y3 ð1 af Þ þ y2 ðaf 1Þ y1 af ð1 þ Þ iCin
Rb Cin Rb
ekt
1 1
½Y2 Rload þ ICout ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
VT Cout
dY4 g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
¼
dt fðar 1Þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ð1 af Þ ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise g C1 L1
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½Y2 Rload þ I ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
VT Cout Cout
g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
fðar 1Þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ð1 af Þ ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise g C1 L1
¼0
1 1
½Y2 Rload þ ICout ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
VT Cout
g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
fðar 1Þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ð1 af Þ ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise g C1 L1
1 1
U1 ðY2 ; g1 ; g2 ; af ; ar ; . . .Þ ¼ ½Y2 Rload þ ICout ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
VT Cout
½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ; U3 ðg2 ; g4 ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ
¼ g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
P3
Function tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ numerator is define as Uk .U1 ðY2 ; g1 ; g2 ;
P k¼1
af ; ar ; . . .Þ ¼ V1T 8j¼1 U1j .
U1j¼1 ¼ fg1 g2 þ g1 ½iL1 ðar 1Þ þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb ekt
þ g2 ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt
þ ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt
ðjÞ
½iL1 ðar 1Þ þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb ekt g fY2 þ y2 ekt g Rload
dICout ðjÞ
Since iL1 iL1 ! e; y4 iL1 ! e; iCout iL1 ! e. . .; dt ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0 then
dICout ðjÞ
Since dt ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0; y2 iL1 ! e; y2 y4 ! e. . . then
dICout ðjÞ
Since dt ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0; y2 iL1 ! e; y2 y4 ! e. . . then
dICout ðjÞ
U1j¼4 ¼ Y2 Rload ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise ; ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0;
dt
U1j¼4 ¼ Rload ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise y2 ekt
1 ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ICout g1 g2 ¼ ðICout þ iCout ekt Þ fg1 þ ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1
Cout
þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt g fg2 þ ½iL1 ðar 1Þ þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1
1
þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb ekt g
Cout
ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout þ iCout ekt Þ fg1 g2 þ g1 ½iL1 ðar 1Þ þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1
þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb ekt þ g2 ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1
þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt þ ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1
þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt ½iL1 ðar 1Þ þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1
1
þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb ekt g
Cout
dICout ðjÞ
Since iL1 iL1 ! e; y4 iL1 ! e; iCout iL1 ! e. . .; dt ¼ 0 ) Y2 ¼ 0 then
ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout þ iCout ekt Þ fg1 g2 þ g1 ½iL1 ðar 1Þ þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1
þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb ekt þ g2 ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1
1
þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt g
Cout
ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout þ iCout ekt Þ ðg1 g2 þ fiL1 ½g1 ðar 1Þ þ g2 ð1 af Þ
þ ½g1 ðar 1Þ þ g2 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 y4 þ iCout ½g1 ð1 ar Þ þ g2 ðaf 1Þ
1
iCin ½g1 þ g2 af þ iRb ½g1 þ g2 af g ekt Þ
Cout
544 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout g1 g2 þ ICout fiL1 ½g1 ðar 1Þ þ g2 ð1 af Þ
þ ½g1 ðar 1Þ þ g2 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 y4
þ iCout ½g1 ð1 ar Þ þ g2 ðaf 1Þ iCin ½g1 þ g2 af
þ iRb ½g1 þ g2 af g ekt þ g1 g2 iCout ekt
þ fiL1 ½g1 ðar 1Þ þ g2 ð1 af Þ
þ ½g1 ðar 1Þ þ g2 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 y4
þ iCout ½g1 ð1 ar Þ þ g2 ðaf 1Þ iCin ½g1 þ g2 af
1
þ iRb ½g1 þ g2 af g iCout ekt ekt Þ
Cout
Since iL1 iCout ! e; y4 iCout ! e. . .
ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout g1 g2 þ ICout fiL1 ½g1 ðar 1Þ þ g2 ð1 af Þ
þ ½g1 ðar 1Þ þ g2 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 y4 þ iCout ½g1 ð1 ar Þ þ g2 ðaf 1Þ
1
iCin ½g1 þ g2 af þ iRb ½g1 þ g2 af g ekt þ g1 g2 iCout ekt Þ
Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ 1
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout g1 g2 þ ICout f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt þ g1 g2 iCout ekt Þ
Cout
1
U1j¼6 ¼ ICout g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise
Cout
ðjÞ
¼ ðICout þ iCout ekt Þ fg1 þ ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1
1
þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt g ðar af 1Þ Ise
Cout
1
U1j¼6 ¼ ICout g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise
Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ fICout g1 þ ICout ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1
þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt þ iCout ekt g1
þ iCout ekt ½iL1 ð1 af Þ
þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ðaf 1Þ
1
iCin af þ iRb af ekt g ðar af 1Þ Ise
Cout
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 545
1
U1j¼6 ¼ ICout g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise
Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ fICout g1 þ ICout ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1
1
þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt þ iCout ekt g1 g ðar af 1Þ Ise
Cout
1 ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼6 ¼ ICout g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise ¼ fICout g1 þ ICout f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt
Cout
1
þ g1 iCout ekt g ðar af 1Þ Ise
Cout
1
U1j¼7 ¼ ICout g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc
Cout
ðjÞ
¼ ðICout þ iCout ekt Þ fg2 þ ½iL1 ðar 1Þ þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1
1
þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb ekt g ðar af 1Þ Isc
Cout
1 ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼7 ¼ ICout g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc ¼ fICout g2 þ ICout ½iL1 ðar 1Þ
Cout
þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb ekt
þ g2 iCout ekt þ ½iL1 ðar 1Þ
þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb
1
iCout ekt ekt g ðar af 1Þ Isc
Cout
1
U1j¼7 ¼ ICout g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc
Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ
¼ fICout g2 þ ICout ½iL1 ðar 1Þ
þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb ekt
1
þ g2 iCout ekt g ðar af 1Þ Isc
Cout
1 ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼7 ¼ ICout g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc ¼ fICout g2 þ ICout f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt
Cout
1
þ g2 iCout ekt g ðar af 1Þ Isc
Cout
1 ðjÞ 1
U1j¼8 ¼ ICout ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise ¼ ðICout þ iCout ekt Þ ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise
Cout Cout
1 ðjÞ 1
U1j¼8 ¼ ICout ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise ¼ ICout ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise
Cout Cout
1
þ ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise iCout ekt
Cout
We can summary our last results in the following Table 5.1.
Table 5.1 Class C power amplifier (PA) with parallel resonance, U1j expressions
U1j Expression
j ¼ 1 ðU1j¼1 Þ U1j¼1 ¼ g1 g2 Rload y2 ekt
j ¼ 2 ðU1j¼2 Þ U1j¼2 ¼ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise Rload y2 ekt
j ¼ 3 ðU1j¼3 Þ U1j¼3 ¼ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc Rload y2 ekt
j ¼ 4 ðU1j¼4 Þ U1j¼4 ¼ Rload ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise y2 ekt
j ¼ 5 ðU1j¼5 Þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼5 ¼ ðICout g1 g2 þ ICout f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt þ g1 g2 iCout ekt Þ C1out
j ¼ 6 ðU1j¼6 Þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼6 ¼ fICout g1 þ ICout f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt
1
þ g1 iCout ekt g ðar af 1Þ Ise
Cout
j ¼ 7 ðU1j¼7 Þ ðjÞ ðjÞ
U1j¼7 ¼ fICout g2 þ ICout f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt
1
þ g2 iCout ekt g ðar af 1Þ Isc
Cout
j ¼ 8 ðU1j¼8 Þ ðjÞ 1
U1j¼8 ¼ ICout ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise
Cout
1
þ ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise iCout ekt
Cout
dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ fg3 þ ½y3 ðar 1Þ þ y2 ð1 ar Þ
dt
Rs 1
y1 ð1 þ Þ iCin ekt g f½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc þ ½iL1 ð1 af Þ
Rb C in Rb
þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt g
dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ fg3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
dt
þ g3 ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt
Rs 1
þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ½y3 ðar 1Þ þ y2 ð1 ar Þ y1 ð1 þ Þ iCin ekt
Rb Cin Rb
Rs 1
þ ½y3 ðar 1Þ þ y2 ð1 ar Þ y1 ð1 þ Þ iCin ekt ½iL1 ð1 af Þ
Rb Cin Rb
þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt g
Since y3 iL1 ! e; y3 y4 ! e . . .
dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ fg3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
dt
þ g3 ½iL1 ð1 af Þ þ y4 ð1 af Þ C1 L1 þ iCout ðaf 1Þ iCin af þ iRb af ekt
Rs 1
þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ½y3 ðar 1Þ þ y2 ð1 ar Þ y1 ð1 þ Þ iCin ekt g
Rb Cin Rb
dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ fg3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
dt
þ g3 f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc f5 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ ekt g
Since y3 iL1 ! e; y3 y4 ! e . . .
dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ¼ fg4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
dt
þ g4 ½iL1 ðar 1Þ þ y4 ðar 1Þ C1 L1
þ iCout ð1 ar Þ iCin þ iRb ekt þ ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
Rs
½y3 ð1 af Þ þ y2 ðaf 1Þ y1 af ð1 þ Þ
Rb
af
iCin ekt g
Cin Rb
dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ¼ fg4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
dt
þ g4 f6 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt þ ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise f7 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ ekt g
1 1
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ f t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þg
C1 L1 VT
1 1 X2 X2
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ f t1k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t2k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þg
C1 L1 VT k¼1 k¼1
P
8
U1j
j¼1
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt
P3
k¼2 Uk
t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt
1 1
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ f t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þg
C1 L1 VT
Stage 1:
P8
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt j¼1 U1j
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C23 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ e2kt
2
ðiCin iRb Þ2 ¼ i2Cin 2 iCin iRb þ i2Rb ; i2Cin ! e; iCin iRb ! e; i2Rb ! e; ðiCin iRb Þ2
!e
P8
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt j¼1 U1j
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
P8 P8
j¼1 U1j C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt j¼1 U1j
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
550 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
P8
j¼1 U1j
t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ ; t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
P
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt 8j¼1 U1j
¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
X
2
t1 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ t1k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ
k¼1
ðjÞ
½ICout C1out ½ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise þ g1 g2 þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc
þ ½g1 g2 Rload y2 þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise Rload y2
þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc Rload y2 þ Rload ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise y2
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ICout C1out f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ þ g1 g2 C1out iCout þ ICout ðar af 1Þ C1out Ise f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
ðjÞ
þ g1 ðar af 1Þ C1out Ise iCout þ ICout ðar af 1Þ C1out Isc f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
þ g2 ðar af 1Þ C1out Isc iCout þ C1out ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise iCout ekt
t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
ðjÞ ðjÞ 1
X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ ¼ ICout ½ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise þ g1 g2
Cout
þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc
ðjÞ
X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ
t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
½g1 g2 Rload y2 þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise Rload y2
þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc Rload y2 þ Rload ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise y2
ðjÞ ðjÞ
þ ICout C1out f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ þ g1 g2 C1out iCout þ ICout ðar af 1Þ C1out Ise f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
ðjÞ
þ g1 ðar af 1Þ C1out Ise iCout þ ICout ðar af 1Þ C1out Isc f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
þ g2 ðar af 1ÞCout
1
Isc iCout þ Cout1
ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise iCout ekt
þ C2 ðg1 ;g2 ;C1 ;ar ;af Þ
ðjÞ
X1 ðI ;g ;g ;...Þ !1 ðy2 ;f1 ðiL1 ;y4 ;...Þ;iCout ;...Þekt
We define t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ C2 ðgC;gout ;C11 ;a2r ;af Þ þ C2 ðg1 ;g2 ;C1 ;ar ;af Þ
1 2
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 551
!1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ ¼ ½g1 g2 Rload y2 þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise Rload y2
þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc Rload y2 þ Rload ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise y2
ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ 1
þ ICout f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ þ g1 g2 iCout þ ICout ðar af 1Þ Ise f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
Cout Cout Cout
1 ðjÞ 1
þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise iCout þ ICout ðar af 1Þ Isc f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
Cout Cout
1 1
þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc iCout þ ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise iCout
Cout Cout
P
8
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt U1j
j¼1
t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt ½g1 g2 Rload y2 ekt þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise Rload y2 ekt
þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc Rload y2 ekt þ Rload ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise y2 ekt
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1 1
þ ICout g1 g2 þ ICout f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt þ g1 g2 iCout ekt
Cout Cout Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ 1
þ fICout g1 þ ICout f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt þ g1 iCout ekt g ðar af 1Þ Ise
Cout
ðjÞ ðjÞ 1
þ fICout g2 þ ICout f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt þ g2 iCout ekt g ðar af 1Þ Isc
Cout
ðjÞ 1 1
þ ICout 2
ðar af 1Þ Isc Ise þ ðar af 1Þ Isc Ise iCout ekt
2
Cout Cout
t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ 2
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
ðjÞ 1
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt ½ICout ½ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise þ g1 g2
Cout
þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc
þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt ½g1 g2 Rload y2 þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise Rload y2
þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc Rload y2 þ Rload ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise y2
ðjÞ 1 1 ðjÞ 1
þ ICout f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; :::Þ þ g1 g2 iCout þ ICout ðar af 1Þ Ise f2 ðiL1 ; y4 ; :::Þ
Cout Cout Cout
1 ðjÞ 1
þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise iCout þ ICout ðar af 1Þ Isc f3 ðiL1 ; y4 ; :::Þ
Cout Cout
1 1
þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc iCout þ ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise iCout ekt
Cout Cout
t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; :::Þ =
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 ðjÞ
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt ½ICout ½ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise þ g1 g2
Cout
þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc
t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
552 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
!2 ðg1 ;g2 ;ar ;af ;...ÞC3 ðaf ;ar ÞðiCin iRb Þekt
We define t12 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ C22 ðg1 ;g2 ;C1 ;ar ;af Þ
ðjÞ 1
!2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ ¼ ½ICout ½ðar af 1Þ2 Isc Ise þ g1 g2
Cout
þ g1 ðar af 1Þ Ise þ g2 ðar af 1Þ Isc
Stage 2:
P3
k¼2 Uk
t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt
dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ¼ fg3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc þ g3 f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt
dt
þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc f5 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ ekt g
dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ¼ fg4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise þ g4 f6 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ ekt
dt
þ ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise f7 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þ ekt g
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ þ U3 ðg2 ; g4 ðdVdts ðtÞ ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ
t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt
X
2
t2 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ t2k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ
k¼1
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 553
dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dt
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt
t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C23 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ2 e2kt
dVs ðtÞ
U2 ðg1 ; g3 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Isc Þ ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dt
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt
t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
fg3 f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ
g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc þ ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc f5 ðy3 ; y2 ; . . .Þg ekt
t21 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt
þ
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dt
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt
t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C23 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ2 e2kt
dVs ðtÞ
U3 ðg2 ; g4 ð ! eÞ; af ; ar ; Ise Þ ½C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dt
C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt
t22 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dY4 1 1 X2 X2
¼ f t1k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t2k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þg
dt C1 L1 VT k¼1 k¼1
dY4 1 X
2
1 X
2
¼ t1k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ þ t2k ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ
dt C1 L1 VT k¼1 C1 L1 k¼1
556 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
ðjÞ
X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ ekt
t11 ðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼ þ
C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
ðjÞ
1 X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C1 L1 VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ ekt
þ
C1 L1 VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ ekt
þ
C1 L1 VT C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 g ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc 1
3 þ !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ ekt
C1 L1 C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C1 L1
1 g ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise 1
4 þ !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þ ekt
C1 L1 C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C1 L1
ðjÞ
fV1T X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise g
tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ ¼
C1 L1 C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ 1
þf þ
C 1 L 1 VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ C1 L1 VT
!2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ
C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 1
þ !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ þ !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þg ekt
C1 L1 C1 L1
5.2 Class C Power Amplifier (PA) with Parallel Resonance … 557
At fixed point:
ðjÞ
fV1T X1 ðICout ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ g3 ½g1 þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc g4 ½g2 þ ðar af 1Þ Ise g
¼0
C1 L1 C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
dY4 dY4
¼ tðY2 ; ICout ; . . .Þ; ¼ y4 k ekt
dt dt
1 !1 ðy2 ; f1 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; iCout ; . . .Þ
y4 k þ f
C1 L1 VT C2 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 !2 ðg1 ; g2 ; ar ; af ; . . .Þ C3 ðaf ; ar Þ ðiCin iRb Þ
þ
C1 L1 VT C22 ðg1 ; g2 ; C1 ; ar ; af Þ
1 1
þ !4 ðiCin ; iRb ; f4 ðiL1 ; y4 ; . . .Þ; . . .Þ þ !3 ðiCin ; iRb ; . . .Þg ¼ 0
C1 L1 C1 L1
We build our system matrices ðiRb ; iCin ; iCout ; iL1 ; y3 ; y4 Þ and ðy1 ; y2 Þ
Rs 1
iRb k y1 iCin ¼ 0; iCin k þ y1 ¼ 0; iCout k þ y2 ¼ 0
Rb Cin Rb
iL1 k þ y3 ¼ 0; y3 k þ y4 ¼ 0
0 1 0 1
m11iRb m12
B C B
0 1 B iCin C B m21
B C m22 C
C
i11 . . . i16 B C B C !
B . . C B iCout C B m31 m32 C
B . . . ... C B C B C y1
@ . AB CþB
B
C ¼ 0; i11 ¼ k;
B iL C B m41 m42 C
C y2
B 1C B C
i61 . . . i66 B C
B y3 C B m m52 C
@ A @ 51 A
y4 m61 m62
1
i12 ¼
Cin Rb
i13 ¼ 0; i14 ¼ i15 ¼ i16 ¼ 0; i21 ¼ 0; i22 ¼ k; i23 ¼ i24 ¼ i25 ¼ i26 ¼ 0
i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k; i34 ¼ i35 ¼ i36 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ i42 ¼ i43 ¼ 0; i44 ¼ k; i45
¼ 1; i46 ¼ 0
i51 ¼ i52 ¼ i53 ¼ i54 ¼ 0; i55 ¼ k; i56 ¼ 1; i66 ¼ k. To find i16 ; . . .; i56 ; m61 ;
m62 , we need to do some analytic work with the expression:
Class B amplifier is a type of power amplifier where the active device (transistor)
conducts only for one half cycle of the input signal. That means the conduction
angle is 180° for a Class B amplifier. Since the active device is switched off for half
the input cycle, the active device dissipates less power and hence the efficiency is
improved. Theoretical maximum efficiency of Class B power amplifier is 78.5 %. it
improves the power efficiency, it creates a lot of distortion. You can find class B
amplifier in the RF power amplifiers where the distortion is not a matter of major
concern. We use in our stability analysis The BJT NPN transistor Gummel-Poon
model since the input signal is large. The small signal S-parameters are not useful
for large-signal or high power circuit design such as power amplifier, mixers,
frequency converters because the active devices (transistor/FET/diode) in these
circuits usually operate in the nonlinear regions. In large signal circuits the voltage
and current variation will be large, for BJT this means the variation of the transistor
terminals voltages will be greater than VT. We must use large signal model of the
transistor, such as Ebers-Molls model, the Gummel-Poon model, the VBIC model.
The most popular large-signal model for BJT is the Spice Gummel Poon
(SGP) model. A more recent alternative to the SGP model is the Vertical Bipolar
Intercompany Model (VBIC) model which offers more accuracies as compared to
SGP model. The Spice Gummel Poon model is based on the device physics of
bipolar junction transistor. The Gummel Poon model is a compact model for bipolar
junction transistor which also takes into account effects of low currents and at high
level injection signal [91–93] (Fig. 5.5).
The base of the transistor Q1 is not biased and the negative half cycle of the
input waveform is missing in the output. Even though it improves the power
Fig. 5.6 Single ended class B amplifier equivalent circuit with BJT transistor Gummel-Poon
model
efficiency, it creates a lot of distortion. Only half the information present in the
input will be available in the output and that is a bad thing. Single ended Class B
amplifiers are not used in present day practical audio amplifier application and they
can be found only in some earlier gadgets. Another place where you can find them
is the RF power amplifiers where the distortion is not a matter of major concern.
The single ended class B amplifier equivalent circuit with BJT transistor
Gummel-Poon model is present in the below schematic. (Fig. 5.6).
The Gummel-Poon schematic equivalent circuit shows the large signal schematic
of the Gummel-Poon model. It represents the physical transistor, a current-controlled
output current sink, and two diode structures including their capacitors.
P
KCL @ (C): C ¼ C0 ; Irc ! e; VC0 VC ! e; IRc þ ICjx þ ICbc þ 2k¼1 IDk ¼ ICt þ ICcs
P
KCL @ (B): B ¼ B0 ; Irb ! e; VB0 VB ! e; ICin ¼ ICjx þ ICbc þ ICbe þ 4k¼1 IDk
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 561
P4
KCL @ (E): E ¼ E0 ; Ire ! e; VE VE0 ! e; ICbe þ k¼3 IDk þ ICt ¼ IRe þ ICout
d d
ICjx ¼ Cjx ðVB0 VC ÞjVB0 ¼VB ¼ Cjx ðVB VC Þ;
dt dt
d d
ICin ¼ Cin ðVA1 VB0 ÞjVB0 ¼VB ¼ Cin ðVA1 VB Þ
dt dt
d d
ICbc ¼ Cbc ðVB VC Þ; ICbe ¼ Cbe ðVB VE Þ;
dt dt
d d
ICout ¼ Cout ðVE0 VA2 ÞjVE0 ¼VE ¼ Cout ðVE VA2 Þ
dt dt
dVc Vs ðtÞ VA1 VA2 Vout
ICcs ¼ Ccs ; IRs ¼ ; VA2 ¼ Vout ; IRload ¼ ¼ ; IC ¼ IRload
dt Rs Rload Rload out
1 qVBC qVBC
n1 ðVBC Þ ¼ Iss ½ ðenr kB T 1Þ þ C4 ðencl kB T 1Þ; n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ ICt
qb b r
Iss nqV BE qVBC
¼ ½e f kB T enr kB T
qb
P4
KCL @ (B): B ¼ B0 ; Irb ! e; VB0 VB ! e; ICin ¼ ICjx þ ICbc þ ICbe þ k¼1 IDk
d d d
Cin ðVA1 VB Þ ¼ Cjx ðVB VC Þ þ Cbc ðVB VC Þ
dt dt dt
d Iss qVBC
þ Cbe ðVB VE Þ þ ðenr kB T 1Þ
dt qb br
qVBC Iss qVBE
þ C4 Iss ðencl kB T 1Þ þ ðenf kB T 1Þ
qb bf
qVBE
þ C2 Iss ðenel kB T 1Þ
d dVBC dVBE
Cin ðVA1 VB Þ ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Cbe þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt dt dt
1 qVBC qVBC
n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ Iss ½ ðenr kB T 1Þ þ C4 ðencl kB T 1Þ
qb br
1 qVBE qVBE
þ Iss ½ ðenf kB T 1Þ þ C2 ðenel kB T 1Þ
qb b f
1 qVBE qVBE
n4 ðVBE Þ ¼ Iss ½ ðenf kB T 1Þ þ C2 ðenel kB T 1Þ;
qb bf
n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ n1 ðVBC Þ þ n4 ðVBE Þ
P4
KCL @ (E): E ¼ E0 ; Ire ! e; VE VE0 ! e; ICbe þ k¼3 IDk þ ICt ¼ IRe þ ICout
d 1 qVBE qVBE
Cbe ðVB VE Þ þ Iss ½ ðenf kB T 1Þ þ C2 ðenel kB T 1Þ
dt qb bf
Iss qVBE qVBC VE VA2
þ ½enf kB T enr kB T Þ ¼ þ
qb Re Rload
dVBE VE VA2
Cbe þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ ;
dt Re Rload
dVBE VE d
Cbe þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ Cout ðVE VA2 Þ
dt Re dt
VA2 d d
ICout ¼ IRload ) ¼ Cout ðVE VA2 Þ ) VA2 ¼ Rload Cout ðVE VA2 Þ
Rload dt dt
Vs ðtÞ VA1 d
IRs ¼ ICin ) ¼ Cin ðVA1 VB Þ ) Vs ðtÞ VA1
Rs dt
d
¼ Rs Cin ðVA1 VB Þ
dt
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 563
d dVBC dVBE
Cin ðVA1 VB Þ ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Cbe þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt dt dt
dVBE VE VA2
Cbe þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ ;
dt Re Rload
dVBE VE d
Cbe þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ Cout ðVE VA2 Þ
dt Re dt
d d
VA2 ¼ Rload Cout ðVE VA2 Þ; Vs ðtÞ VA1 ¼ Rs Cin ðVA1 VB Þ
dt dt
&&
Assumption IRs Rs ! e ) VA1 Vs ðtÞ; dVdts ðtÞ ! e ) dtA1 ! e; Vs ðtÞ VA1 ! e
dV
dVBE VE VA2
Cbe þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ ; VA2
dt Re Rload
dVE dVA2
¼ Rload Cout Rload Cout
dt dt
dVA1 dVBE dVE dVBE dVE
Rs Cin ð ! eÞ Rs Cin Rs Cin ¼ 0; ¼
dt dt dt dt dt
We get the following set of system differential equations:
dVBE VE VA2
Cbe þ n4 ðVBE Þ þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ þ
dt Re Rload
dVBE VA2
VE ¼ Cbe Re þ n4 ðVBE Þ Re þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ Re Re
dt Rload
dVBC
Vcc VBE þ VBC Rc n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ Rc n1 ðVBC Þ þ Rc ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs
dt
dVBE VA2
¼ Cbe Re þ n4 ðVBE Þ Re þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ Re Re
dt Rload
dVBC
Vcc VBE þ VBC þ Rc n1 ðVBC Þ þ Rc ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs
dt
dVBE VA2
¼ Cbe Re þ n4 ðVBE Þ Re þ ½Re þ Rc n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ Re
dt Rload
dVBC dVBE
½Cjx þ Cbc þ Cbe þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ ¼ 0
dt dt
dVBE dVBC
) Cbe ¼ ½Cjx þ Cbc n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt dt
dVBE Cjx þ Cbc dVBC 1
¼ ½ n ðVBE ; VBC Þ
dt Cbe dt Cbe 3
566 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
dVBC
Vcc VBE þ VBC þ Rc n1 ðVBC Þ þ Rc ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs
dt
(1)
dVBE VA2
¼ Cbe Re þ n4 ðVBE Þ Re þ ½Re þ Rc n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ Re
dt Rload
dVBC
Vcc VBE þ VBC þ Rc n1 ðVBC Þ þ Rc ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs
dt
Cjx þ Cbc dVBC
¼ Cbe Re f½
Cbe dt
1 VA2
þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þg þ n4 ðVBE Þ Re þ ½Re þ Rc n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ Re
Cbe Rload
dVBC
ðRc ½Cjx þ Cbc þ Ccs þ Re ½Cjx þ Cbc Þ ¼ Re n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ n4 ðVBE Þ Re
dt
VA 2
þ ½Re þ Rc n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ Rc n1 ðVBC Þ Re Vcc þ VBE VBC
Rload
dVBC Re Re
¼ n ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ n4 ðVBE Þ
dt C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ 3 C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Re þ Rc Rc
þ½ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ n ðVBC Þ
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ 1
VA2 Re VBE VBC Vcc
þ
Rload C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Re Re þ Rc
X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ ¼ ; X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ ¼ ; X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Rc
¼
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
dVBC
¼ X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ þ n4 ðVBE Þ X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
dt
þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ n1 ðVBC Þ
VA2 VBE VBC Vcc
X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ þ
Rload C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 567
Cjx þ Cbc
w2 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½ fX1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
Cbe
þ n4 ðVBE Þ X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
VA2
X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ n1 ðVBC Þ X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Rload
VBE VBC Vcc 1
þ g n ðVBE ; VBC Þ
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ Cbe 3
Cjx þ Cbc
w3 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½ fX1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ n3 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
Cbe
þ n4 ðVBE Þ X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ þ X2 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ n2 ðVBE ; VBC Þ
VA2
X3 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ n1 ðVBC Þ X1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ
Rload
VBE VBC Vcc 1 1
þ gþ n ðVBE ; VBC Þ VA 2
C1 ðRc ; Re ; . . .Þ Cbe 3 Rload Cout
dVBE dVA2
¼ w2 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ; ¼ w3 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ
dt dt
dVA2
To find system fixed points: dVBC
dt ¼ 0; dVBE
dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0
w1 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ 0; w2 ðVBE
; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ 0; w3 ðVBE
; VBC ; VA2 ; . . .Þ ¼ 0
Fixed point and linearization: We approximate our system phase portrait near a
fixed point VBE ; VBC ; VA2 by corresponding it as a linear system.
We consider the system dVdtBC ¼ w1 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ; dVdtBE ¼ w2 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ
dVA2
¼ w3 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ and suppose that ðVBE
dt ; VBC ; VA2 Þ is a fixed point, i.e.,
w1 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ ¼ 0; w2 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ ¼ 0; w3 ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ ¼ 0. Let u ¼
VBC VBC v ¼ VBE VBE ; w ¼ VA2 VA2 denote the components of a small dis-
turbance from the fixed point. To see whether the disturbance grows or decays, we
dVA2
dt ¼ dt ; dt ¼ dt ; dt ¼ dt
dVBC dv dVBE dw
need to derive differential equations for u, v, and w. du
Since VBE ; VBC ; VA2 are constants. By substitution:
du dVBC
¼ ¼ w1 ðv þ VBE ; u þ VBC ; w þ VA2 Þ ¼ w1 ðVBE
; VBC ; VA2 Þ
dt dt
@w1 @w1 @w1
þu þv þw þ Oðu2 ; v2 ; w2 ; uvw; . . .Þ
@VBC @VBE @VA2
Oðu2 ; v2 ; w2 ; . . .Þ.
The partial derivatives are to be evaluated at the fixed point ðVBE ; VBC ; VA2 Þ and
they are numbers and not functions. Also the shorthand notation Oðu2 ; v2 ; w2 ; . . .Þ:
Denotes quadratic terms in u, v, and w and it extremely small. Similarly we find
@w2 @w2 @w3
dv
dt ¼ dt ¼ u @VBC þ v @VBE þ w @VA þ Oðu ; v ; w ; . . .Þ and the expression
dVBE 2 2 2
2
dVA2 @w3 @w3 @w3
dw
dt ¼ dt ¼ u @VBC
þ v @V BE
þ w @VA
þ Oðu2 ; v2 ; w2 ; . . .Þ. We denote (u, v, w) a
2
disturbance [2–4].
0 1
du 0 @w 1 0 1
B dt C 1 @w1 @w1
B C @V @VBE @VA2 u
B dv C B @wBC2 @w2 @w2 C B C
B C B C @ v A þ quadratic term
B dt C ¼ @ @VBC @VBE @VA2 A
B C @w3 @w3 @w3
@ dw A @VBC @VBE @VA2
w
dt
5.3 Single Ended Class B Amplifier … 569
0 @w2 @w2
1
@w1 @VBE k @VA2
detðA k IÞ ¼ ð kÞðV ;V ;V Þ det@ A
@VBC BE BC A2 @w3 @w3
k
@VBE @VA2 ;V ;V Þ
ðVBE BC A
0 @w2 @w2
1 2
@w1 @w @w3
detðA k IÞ ¼ k3 þ ½ þð 2 þ Þ k2
@VBC @VBE @VA2 ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
@w @w3 @w1 @w @w3
þ ½ð 1 Þ ð 2 þ Þ
@VA2 @VBC @VBC @VBE @VA2
@w @w3 @w3 @w2 @w @w2
ð 2 Þþð 1 Þ k
@VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VBC ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
@w @w @w3 @w3 @w2
þ½ 1 ð 2 Þ
@VBC @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2
@w @w @w3 @w3 @w2
ð 1Þð 2 Þ
@VBE @VBC @VA2 @VBC @VA2
@w @w @w3 @w3 @w2
þð 1Þ ð 2 Þ
@VA2 @VBC @VBE @VBC @VBE ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
@w1 @w @w3
N3 ¼ 1; N2 ¼ ½ þð 2 þ Þ
@VBC @VBE @VA2 ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
@w @w3 @w1 @w @w3
N1 ¼ ½ð 1 Þ ð 2 þ Þ
@VA2 @VBC @VBC @VBE @VA2
@w @w3 @w3 @w2 @w @w2
ð 2 Þþð 1 Þ
@VBE @VA2 @VBE @VA2 @VBE @VBC ðVBE ;VBC ;VA2 Þ
We get three eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, λ3) for our system and need to classify them. If
k1 ; k2 ; k3 2 R then our fixed point VBE ; VBC ; VA2 is classify in the below Table 5.2
Table 5.2 Single ended class B amplifier system eigenvalues and stability classification
System eigenvalues Stability classification VBE ; VBC ; VA2
λ1 > 0, λ2 > 0, λ3 > 0 Unstable node
λ1 > 0, λ2 > 0, λ3 < 0 Saddle point
λ1 > 0, λ2 < 0, λ3 < 0 Saddle point
λ1 < 0, λ2 < 0, λ3 < 0 Stable node
System eigenvalues Stability classification VBE ; VBC ; VA2
g1 [ 0; k3 [ 0 Unstable spiral node
g1 [ 0; k3 \0 Unstable spiral saddle
g1 \0; k3 [ 0 Unstable spiral saddle
g1 \0; k3 \0 Stable spiral node
When we want to amplify a very low power signal, we use Low Noise Amplifier
(LNA). It is done without degrading its signal to noise ratio (SNR). LNA device is a
crucial element in every RF receiver system and it amplifies the signal that comes
from the antenna. Regular amplifier will increase the power of both the signal and the
noise which come from the antenna and present at the amplifier’s input. Additionally
amplifiers are not ideal and they add noise to the input signal. Low Noise Amplifiers
(LNAs) are designed to minimize the additional noise. The target is to minimize the
additional noise by considering tradeoffs that include impedance matching. choosing
the amplifier technology, and selecting low-noise biasing conditions. Low-noise
amplifiers are found in many radio communications systems, medical instruments,
and electronic equipments. The conventional LNA operates on a single band, while
wideband LNA operate typically from 100 MHz to 1GHz and it hard to design. It is a
challenge to design broadband amplifier with the best performances. One architecture
is the combination of several narrows band LNA circuit into a single wideband LNA
circuit. LNA feedback technique is proposed to simultaneously achieve improvement
in bandwidth and on its gain, noise figure and return loss. The negative feedback
technique can be used in wideband amplifier to provide a flat gain response and to
reduce the input and output VSWR. It controls the amplifier performance due to
technical specifications variation from transistor to transistor and in band stability is
also improved by employing negative feedback. The LNA is most important block in
any receiving system because the receiving system sensitivity is generally determined
by its gain and noise figure. LNAs figures of merit are reduced Noise Figure (NF),
moderated gain, good input/output impedance matching, low power consumption,
isolation between input and output, acceptable linearity (low distortion), and stability.
There are many ways to design LNAs. It can be single ended or differential, single
stage, multistage, depending on type of engineering application and applications.
Typical single end LNA system is a two stage single ended LNA. The first stage
cascode amplifier is chosen for its simple input matching, its higher gain compared to
574 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
an inductively degenerated common emitter amplifier, and its high reverse isolation
and higher stability compared to a common base counterpart. The second stage
consists of a common emitter cascode amplifier without emitter degeneration for
higher gain. Differential LNA is composed of two stages. The first stage is a dif-
ferential cascode amplifier using LC impedance peaking network as load. This load
impedance can be made very large across the desired frequency band in order to force
the output current to flow into the following stage. In practice the series resistance in
the transmission line inductor will limit the impedance peaking effect. The second
stage is a conventional emitter coupled differential amplifier with high common mode
rejection. It is used to amplify the desired signal and compress the common mode
signal. The two stages are connected by a coupling capacitor C. The single ended
architecture has one disadvantage that it is very sensitive to parasitic ground
inductance. A differential LNA can beneficial while the noise figure is higher than
single ended design. We get higher gain by using multi stage LNA but the problem is
that is difficult to maintain stability than single stage LNA. The selection of design
option depends on type of application and specific design targets. The wideband
LNA is required to be in single stage, low power consumption, and minimum
components. The most important design considerations in a LNA design are stability,
noise, power gain, bandwidth, and DC requirements. The DC biasing circuit is used
to bias the selected transistor and the input and output matching network is important
for maximum power transfer in the circuit. LNAs operate in class A mode, charac-
terized by a bias point at the center of maximum voltage and current of the bias
supply for the transistor. The biasing point for the LNA should have high gain, low
noise figure, linear, good input and output matching and stable at the lowest current
drain from the supply. In designing LNAs, stability of the circuit is important pa-
rameter. This stability characteristic means that the device does not oscillate over a
range of frequencies with any combination of source and load impedance. The next
figure describes the block diagram of LNA [121, 122] (Fig. 5.7).
BJT technology is selected to design the wideband low noise amplifier due to the
higher gain at low power consumption, with reasonable low noise figure.
The RC feedback is the one of the most popular techniques to be used in
amplifiers circuit for its wideband input match and good linearity. The schematic of
the LNA is shown in the below figure. The transistor is self biased with the biasing
resistor of R1 and R2 and designed to low power product application. (Fig. 5.8).
The LNA design has implemented RLC feedback (L1, R3, C1) in order to lower
the gain at the lower frequencies and hence improve the stability of the circuit. We
need to tune the RLC feedback banch in order to meet the design specifications.
The LNA design also employs output resistive loading in stabilizing the circuit. The
initial output resistor value R4 is set to less than 50 Ω because high output resistor
value may result in huge decrease of gain and P1 dB point. L2 and L3 in the circuit
acts as RF choke which separate RF and DC path in the circuit. The LNA is
matched using lumped element as it is simple and compact (L matching network).
Typical LC matching network include the use of capacitors and inductors in either
series or shunt configuration. Circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT
Small Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. We consider “AC ground“ in the
circuit. Since the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there is no time
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative … 575
Fig. 5.8 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with input and output matching network
schematics
Fig. 5.9 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with SS hybrid PI model and matching networks
Table 5.3 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with SS hybrid PI model and matching
networks KCL@ node and expressions
KCL @ node Expression
A1 IRs ¼ ICin þ ILin
A2 ILin ¼ Irp þ IL1 þ IL2
A3 IL1 ¼ IR3
A4 IR3 ¼ IC1
A5 IC1 þ IL3 ¼ IR4 þ gm vBE
A6 IL2 ¼ IR2
A7 IR2 ¼ IR1 þ IL3
A8 IR4 ¼ ICout þ ILout
A9 ILout ¼ IRload
Vs ðtÞ VA1
IRs ¼ ) IRs Rs ¼ Vs ðtÞ VA1 ) VA1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs
Rs
d dVs ðtÞ dIRs dIL
ICin ¼ Cin ðVs ðtÞ IRs Rs Þ ¼ Cin ð Rs Þ; VA1 VA2 ¼ Lin in
dt dt dt dt
dILin dILin VA2
VA2 ¼ VA1 Lin ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs Lin ; I rp ¼ ) V A 2 ¼ I rp r p
dt dt rp
dIL dIL dIL
Irp rp ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs Lin in ; VA2 VA3 ¼ L1 1 ) VA3 ¼ VA2 L1 1
dt dt dt
dIL1 VA 3 VA 4
VA3 ¼ Irp rp L1 ; IR 3 ¼
dt R3
) IR3 R3 ¼ VA3 VA4 ) VA4 ¼ VA3 IR3 R3
dIL d
VA4 ¼ Irp rp L1 1 IR3 R3 ; IC1 ¼ C1 ðVA4 VA5 Þ
dt dt
d dIL
¼ C1 ðIrp rp L1 1 IR3 R3 VA5 Þ
dt dt
dIL2 VA VA7
VA6 ¼ Irp rp L2 ; IR 2 ¼ 6
dt R2
dIL2
) IR2 R2 ¼ VA6 VA7 ¼ Irp rp L2 IR1 R1
dt
VA7
IR1 ¼ ) VA7 ¼ IR1 R1 ; IR2 R2
R1
dIL dIL
¼ Irp rp L2 2 IR1 R1 ; VA7 VA5 ¼ L3 3
dt dt
dIL3 dIr d 2 IL dIR dVA7 d 2 IL
VA 5 ¼ VA 7 L 3 ; IC1 ¼ C1 ð p rp L1 2 1 3 R3 þ L3 2 3 Þ
dt dt dt dt dt dt
dIrp d 2 IL1 dIR3 dIR1 d 2 IL3
VA 7 ¼ IR1 R1 ) IC1 ¼ C1 ð rp L1 2 R3 R1 þ L3 2 Þ
dt dt dt dt dt
VA5 VA8 dVA8
IR 4 ¼ ) IR4 R4 ¼ VA5 VA8 ) VA8 ¼ VA5 IR4 R4 ; ICout ¼ Cout
R4 dt
dVA5 dIR4
¼ Cout ð R4 Þ
dt dt
578 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
dIR2
[III] IR2 R2 ¼ Irp rp L2 dt IR1 R1
dIrp d2 I dI dI d2 I
[IV] IC1 ¼ C1 ð dt rp L1 dtC2 1 dtC1 R3 dtR1 R1 þ L3 dt2L3 Þ
dI d2 I dI dI
[V] ICout ¼ Cout ð dtR1 R1 L3 dt2L3 dtR4 R4 Þ, [VI] ICout ¼ Cout ð dtLout Rload þ
d 2 ILout
Lout dt2 Þ
d 2 IL3 dIR1 dIR4
[IV] + [V] L3 dt2 ¼ dt R1 dt R4 ICout C1out
IRs ¼ ICin þ ILin ) ICin ¼ IRs ILin ; IC1 þ IR2 IR1 ¼ IR4 þ gm Irp rp
IR1 ¼ IC1 þ IR2 gm Irp rp IR4 ; IR4 ¼ ICout þ ILout ) ICout ¼ IR4 ILout
dIR2
[III] IR2 R2 ¼ Irp rp L2 dt ½IC1 þ IR2 gm Irp rp IR4 R1
d 2 IC1 dIC1 dIR4
[IV] + [V] IC1 ¼ C1 ðdIdtrp rp L1 dt2 dt R3 dt R4 ½IR4 ILout C1out Þ
dI d2 I
[VI] IR4 ILout ¼ Cout ð dtLout
Rload þ Lout dtL2out Þ
dI d2 I dI dI
We define new variables: Y1 ¼ dIdtrp ; Y2 ¼ dtC1 ; dYdt2 ¼ dtC2 1 ; Y3 ¼ dtR4 ; Y4 ¼ dtLout
[I] IRs ILin ¼ Cin ðdVdts ðtÞ dIdtRs Rs Þ, [II] Irp rp ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs Lin dtLin :
dI
dI
[III] IR2 R2 ¼ Irp rp L2 dtR2 ½IC1 þ IR2 gm Irp rp IR4 R1
[IV] + [V] IC1 ¼ C1 ðY1 rp L1 dYdt2 Y2 R3 Y3 R4 IR4 C1out þ ILout C1out Þ
[VI] IR4 ILout ¼ Cout ðY4 Rload þ Lout dYdt4 Þ
We can summary our system differential equations:
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative … 579
dIR2 R2 rp R1
¼ IR2 þ Irp ½IC1 þ IR2 gm Irp rp IR4
dt L2 L2 L2
dY2 1 rp R3 R4 1 1
¼ IC1 þ Y1 Y2 Y3 IR4 þ ILout
dt C1 L1 L1 L1 L1 Cout L1 Cout L1
1 1
iRs k iRs þ iLin ¼0
Cin Rs Cin Rs
1 ðjÞ Rs rp
iLin k ekt ¼ Vs ðtÞ ½IRs þ iRs ekt ½IrðjÞ
p
þ iRp ekt
Lin Lin Lin
1 1 Rload
y4 k þ iR4 iLout y4 ¼0
Cout Lout Cout Lout Lout
ðjÞ R2 rp ðjÞ
iR2 k ekt ¼ ½IR2 þ iR2 ekt þ ½IrðjÞ
p
þ iRp ekt ½IC1 þ iC1 ekt
L2 L2
ðjÞ ðjÞ R1
þ IR2 þ iR2 ekt gm ðIrðjÞ
p
þ iRp ekt Þ rp IR4 iR4 ekt
L2
R2 rp R1
iR2 k iR2 þ iRp ½iC1 þ iR2 gm iRp rp iR4 ¼0
L2 L2 L2
R2 R1 rp R1 R1 R1
iR2 k iR2 iR2 þ iRp þ iRp gm rp iC1 þ iR ¼ 0
L2 L2 L2 L2 L2 L2 4
1 X 2
1 R1 R1
iR2 k iR2 Rk þ iRp rp ð1 þ gm R1 Þ iC1 þ iR ¼ 0
L2 k¼1 L2 L2 L2 4
At fixed point:
1 rp R3 R4
y2 k ekt ¼ iC1 ekt þ y1 ekt y2 ekt y3 ekt iR4
C1 L1 L1 L1 L1
1 kt 1 kt
e þ iLout e
Cout L1 Cout L1
1 rp R3 R4 1 1
y2 k iC1 þ y1 y2 y3 iR4 þ iLout
C1 L1 L1 L1 L1 Cout L1 Cout L1
¼0
We build our system matrices ðiRp ; iC1 ; iR4 ; iLout ; iRs ; iLin ; y4 ; iR2 ; y2 Þ and ðy1 ; y2 ; y3 Þ
1 1 Rs rp
iRs k iRs þ iLin ¼ 0; iLin k iRs iRp ¼0
Cin Rs Cin Rs Lin Lin
Rload 1 1
y4 k y4 þ iR4 iLout ¼0
Lout Cout Lout Cout Lout
1 X 2
1 R1 R1
iR2 k iR2 Rk þ iRp rp ð1 þ gm R1 Þ iC1 þ iR ¼ 0
L2 k¼1 L2 L2 L2 4
R3 1 rp R4 1 1
y2 k y2 iC1 þ y1 y3 iR4 þ iLout
L1 C1 L1 L1 L1 Cout L1 Cout L1
¼0
5.4 Wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with Negative … 583
0 1 0 1
iRp m11 m12
B i C B m21 m22 C
B C1 C B C
B C
B iR4 C B m31 m32 C
B C B C
0 1 B C B m41 m42
C
i11 . . . i19 B Lout C B
i C !
B .. .. C B C B C
.. B iRs C þ B C
m51 m52 y1
@ . . . A B C B C ¼ 0; i11 ¼ k; i12 ¼
B C B C y3
i91 . . . i99 B iLin C B m61 m62 C
B C B C
B y4 C B m71 m72 C
B C B C
B C B C
@ iR A @
2
m81 m82 A
y2 m91 m92
¼ i19 ¼ 0; i21 ¼ 0; i22 ¼ k
i23 ¼ ¼ i28 ¼ 0; i29 ¼ 1; i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k; i34 ¼ ¼ i39 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ i42
¼ i43 ¼ 0; i44 ¼ k
1
i45 ¼ i46 ¼ 0; i47 ¼ 1; i48 ¼ i49 ¼ 0; i51 ¼ i54 ¼ 0; i55 ¼ k ; i56
Cin Rs
1
¼ ; i57 ¼ i58 ¼ i59 ¼ 0
Cin Rs
rp Rs
i61 ¼ ; i62 ¼ ¼ i64 ¼ 0; i65 ¼ ; i66 ¼ k; i67 ¼ ¼ i69 ¼ 0; i71
Lin Lin
¼ i72 ¼ 0
1 1 Rload
i73 ¼ ; i74 ¼ ; i75 ¼ i76 ¼ 0; i77 ¼ k ; i78 ¼ i79 ¼ 0
Cout Lout Cout Lout Lout
1 R1 R1
i81 ¼ rp ð1 þ gm R1 Þ; i82 ¼ ; i83 ¼ ; i84 ¼ i85 ¼ i86 ¼ i87 ¼ 0; i88
L2 L2 L2
1 X 2
¼ k Rk
L2 k¼1
1 1 1
i89 ¼ 0; i91 ¼ 0; i92 ¼ ; i93 ¼ ; i94 ¼ ; i95 ¼ i96 ¼ i97
C1 L1 Cout L1 Cout L1
¼0
R3
i98 ¼ 0; i99 ¼ k ; m11 ¼ 1; m12 ¼ 0; m21 ¼ 0; m22 ¼ 0; m31 ¼ 0; m32 ¼ 1
L1
rp R4
m81 ¼ 0; m82 ¼ 0; m91 ¼ ; m92 ¼
L1 L1
(Fig. 5.10).
There are two families of equivalent active mode BJT small signal circuit:
Hybrid Pi model and T model. Both are equally valid models but choosing one over
the other sometimes leads to simpler analysis of certain circuits.
Hybrid Pi model Version A: The circuit incorporates all of the necessary small
signal characteristics of the BJT ib ¼ vrbep ; ic ¼ gm vbe ; ib þ ic ¼ ie ; ie ¼ vrbee
(Fig. 5.13).
Hybrid Pi model Version B: The second equivalent circuit is constructed by
using the following notation: gm vbe ¼ gm ðib rp Þ ¼ gm rp ib ¼ bf ib
(Fig. 5.14).
T model: The hybrid Pi model is the most popular small signal model for the
BJT. The alternative is the T model, which is useful in certain situations.
T model Version A: (Fig. 5.15).
T model Version B: (Fig. 5.16).
The small signal model for PNP BJTs are identically the same as for NPN
transistors. There is no change in any polarities (voltage or current) for the PNP
models relative to the NPN models. These small signal models are identically the
same.
Exercises
BJT transistor Ebers-Moll model. The coupling coefficient between LED D3 and
photo transistor Q1 is “k” ðIBQ1 ¼ k ID3 Þ. C1 and C2 are input DC decoupling
capacitors and input RF source Vs(t) with series resistance Rs. Hint: we use
analog optocoupler in our circuit.
1:1 Draw circuit class AB push-pull variation amplifier equivalent circuit and
write the related circuit differential equations (Use transistor Q1 and Q2
Ebers-Moll model).
1:2 Find circuit fixed points and discuss stability by parameters variation.
1:3 We short diode D1, How it influences circuit behavior and stability?
1:4 We define coupling function between LED D3 current
and photo transistor
PM k
Q1 base current IBQ1 ¼ k¼1 ID3 ak ; M 2 N . How parameters a1 ; a2 ;
. . .; aM influence on circuit behavior stability?
1:5 Diode D3 is disconnected, Find circuit differential equations and fixed
points. Discuss stability.
Exercises 589
2:1 Draw circuit class AB push-pull variation amplifier equivalent circuit and
write the related circuit differential equations. (Use transistors Q1, Q2, and
Q3 Ebers-Moll model.)
2:2 Find circuit fixed points and discuss stability by circuit parameters variation.
2:3 Resistor rp → ε, How it influences on circuit behavior and stability?
590 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
2:4 We define
coupling function between diode D3 and
photo transistor Q2 base
PP Ql
current IBQ2 ¼ l¼1 ½bl k¼1 ID3 ak ; P 2 N . How parameters ak ; bl
k
3:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability.
3:2 Inductor L2 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit behavior?
Find fixed points and circuit differential equations. Discuss stability.
3:3 Resistor Rb is changed by Γ1 multiplication factor ðRb ! Rb C1 ; C1 2 RÞ.
We have two cases: (a) 0\C1 \1(b) C1 [ 1. How the dynamical behavior
Exercises 591
of the circuit is changed for cases (a) and (b)? Discuss stability for both
cases.
3:4 Capacitor C1 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit behavior? Find
fixed points and circuit differential equations. Discuss stability.
3:5 Capacitor C1 and inductor L1 are changed according the following trans-
formation: C1 ! C1 C2 ; L1 ! L1 C22 ; C2 [ 1; C2 [ 0; C2 2 R. How the
dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of
parameter Γ2? Discuss stability.
4. We have power amplifier with two internal resonant circuits. The first resonant
circuit is connected between the Vcc and Q1’s emitter (C1 and L1) and the second
resonant circuit is connected between Q1’s emitter and ground (C2 and L2). Rb is
transistor Q1’s base resistor and Cin, Cout are input and output blocking
capacitors. Input RF source is Vs(t) with series resistance Rs. Since the input RF
signal is a large signal, we use in our analysis the Ebers-Moll BJT model of Q1
transistor. Assumption: dVdts ðtÞ ! e.
4:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability.
4:2 Capacitor C2 is disconnected. Find fixed points and circuit differential
equations. Discuss stability.
4:3 Transistor Q1’s af ; ar parameters are changed by multiplication factors Γ1
and Γ2 respectively af ! af C1 ; ar ! ar C2 ; C1 ; C2 2 R. af : 0:95 !
0:99; 0:95
af C1
0:99; ar : 0 ! 0:95; 0\ar C2 \0:95; af [ ar .
How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of
592 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
5:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability [two cases, S1 in position (1) and (2)].
5:2 Resistor Rc is changed by factor Ω1 ðRc ! Rc X1 ; X1 [ 0; X1 2 RÞ. How
the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of Ω1
parameter? [Two cases: S1 in position (1) and (2)].
Exercises 593
Biasing circuit of Q2 at high power level: Diode D1, resistor R2, and resistor Rb1
rectify the RF supplied from the input and develops DC bias from transistor Q1
which is proportional to the RF input drive level. At low RF input level, Q1 is
biased OFF and allowing resistor R1 to develop the bias for RF amplifier Q2 which
operating in a class B. When RF input is increased sufficiently, transistor Q1 begin
to saturate, shunting resistor R1 and changing the operating mode of amplifier Q2
from class B to class C. At high drive level conditions, the DC dynamic impedance
between the base-emitter of Q2 is very low and promoting maximum transistor gain
and efficiency. As the drive level is increased or decreased from an intermediate
level (V ± ΔV), the dynamic impedance changes in a nonlinear manner. At low
power input RF transistor Q2 operates at class B and at higher power levels tran-
sistor Q2 operates at class C.
Constant current diode: Constant current diode is an electric device that limits
current to a maximum specified value for device (CLD—Current Limiting Diode,
CRD—Current Regulating Diode). This diode consist of a n-channel JFET tran-
sistor with the gate shorted to the source, which functions like a two terminal
current limiter or current source (analog to voltage limiting Zener diode). It allows a
current through to rise to a certain value, and then level OFF at specific value. This
Exercises 595
diode keeps the current constant. This device keeps the current flowing through it
unchanged when the voltage changes.
Ferrite bead circuit model: A ferrite bead is a passive device that suppresses
high frequency noise in electric circuit. It is a specific type of electronic choke.
Ferrite beads prevent interference in two directions, from a device or to a device.
The equivalent ferrite bead is as follow:
596 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
In circuit analysis we need to use for low power level input RF signal—BJT
transistor Small Signal (SS) model (Hybrid Pi) and for high power level input RF
signal—BJT transistor Gummel-Poon model.
6:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations for low power level and
high power level input RF signals. Find fixed points and discuss stability.
6:2 Resistor R1 is disconnected. How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is
changed? Find circuit differential equations and fixed points. Discuss
stability.
6:3 We replace constant current diode (D2) by regular diode. How the
dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed? Find circuit differential
equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
6:4 We replace Ferrite bead F1 by regular RF choke (LF). How the dynamical
behavior of the circuit is changed? Find circuit differential equations and
fixed points. Discuss stability.
6:5 We replace diode D1 by D2 and diode D2 by D1. How the dynamical
behavior of the circuit is changed? Find circuit differential equations and
fixed points. Discuss stability.
7. We have wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with negative feedback net-
work. The feedback network consists of capacitors, resistors, and inductors as
describe in the below circuit. Input and output matching networks are Pi-type.
Input RF signal is Vs(t), Vs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; A0 nðtÞ.
Inductors L2, L3 in the circuit act as the RF choke which blocks the DC current
from entering the RF path. The LNA design also employs output resistive loading
in stabilizing the circuit. The initial output resistor value, R4 is set to less than
100 Ω (R4 < 100 Ω) because high output resistor value may result in huge decrease
of gain and P1 dB point. The BJT transistor (Q1) is self-biased with the biasing
resistors of R2 and R3.
Exercises 597
7:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability.
7:2 Capacitor C2 is disconnected. How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is
changed? Discuss stability and find circuit differential equations and fixed
points.
7:3 We change the input and output matching networks from Pi-type to T-type.
How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed? Discuss stability.
7:4 Resistor R4 is changed by factor Γ ðR4 ! R4 C; C [ 0; C 2 R þ Þ. How
the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for different values of Γ
parameter? Discuss stability for the cases: (a) 0\C
1, (b) C [ 0.
qffiffiffiffiffiffi
7:5 Transistor Q1’s αf and αr parameters are changed by factor Ω1 and X21
3
qffiffiffiffiffiffi
respectively ðaf ! af X1 ; ar ! ar X21 ; X1 [ 0; X1 2 R þ Þ. How the
3
9. We have two wideband LNAs with negative feedback networks which are
connected in cascade. The first wideband LNA circuit feeds the second wide-
band LNA circuit. The feedback networks include mixture of capacitors,
inductors, and resistors. There are three circuit’s matching networks, input
matching network Pi-type, cascade matching network T-type, and output
matching network Pi-type. Input RF signal is Vs(t), Vs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ
nðtÞ; A0 nðtÞ. Inductors L3, L4 in the first LNA circuit and inductors L7, L8
in the second LNA circuit act as the RF choke which blocks the DC current
from entering the RF part in each LNA circuit. The LNAs design also employs
output resistive loadings (R4.R5 and R9) in stabilizing the circuit. The initial
output resistors values, R4.R5 and R9 are set to less than 100 Ω
ðR4 ; R5 ; R9 \100 XÞ because high output resistor values may result in huge
decrease of gain and P1dB point. The BJT transistors (Q1 and Q2) are
self-biased with the biasing resistors R1, R2 and R8, R7 respectively. Switch S1
connects and disconnects the second LNA negative feedback network.
Exercises 599
9:1 Write circuit equations and differential equations. Find fixed points and
discuss stability (switch S1 is close).
9:2 How the circuit dynamic is changed if S1 switch is open? Find circuit
differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
9:3 We change the input and output matching networks to T-type. The cascade
matching network is L-type. Switch S1 is in close state. Find circuit dif-
ferential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
9:4 Transistor Q2’s αf and αr parameters are changed by factor Ω1 and
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X31 þ 1 (af ! af X1 ; ar ! ar X31 þ 1; X1 [ 0;
5 5
respectively
X1 2 R þ ).
Switch S1 is open. How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is changed for
different values of Ω1 parameter. Discuss stability for different values of Ω1
parameter.
9:5 We disconnect capacitor C1. How the dynamical behavior of the circuit is
changed? Discuss stability and find circuit differential equations, fixed
points (switch S1 is close).
10. We have wideband Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) with possible four options of
negative feedback networks. The feedback network consists of capacitors,
resistors, inductors, and two SPD2 switches. Input and output matching net-
works are T-type. Input RF signal is Vs(t), Vs ðtÞ ¼ A0 þ nðtÞ; A0 nðtÞ.
Inductors L1, L2 in the circuit act as the RF choke which blocks the DC current
from entering the RF path. The LNA design also employs output resistive
loading in stabilizing the circuit. The initial output resistor value, R3 is set to
600 5 Power Amplifier (PA) System Stability Analysis
less than 100 Ω (R3 < 100 Ω) because high output resistor value may result in
huge decrease of gain and P1 dB point. The BJT transistor (Q1) is self-biased
with the biasing resistors R1 and R2. The possible negative feedback networks
options are as follow: (1) S1(a1) & S2(a2), (2) S1(a1) & S2(b2), (3) S1(b1) &
S2(a2), (4) S1(b1) & S2(b2).
10:1 Write circuit equations and circuit differential equations for each of the
negative feedback network options. Find fixed points and discuss stability
for each network option.
10:2 We short inductor L1, How it influences the circuit dynamics? Find circuit
differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability (all network
options cases).
10:3 We short resistor R3, How it influences circuit dynamics? Find circuit
differential equations, fixed points and discuss stability (all network
options cases).
10:4 Return (10.1), (10.2), and (10.3) when the input and output matching
networks are L-type.
10:5 Return (10.1), (10.2), and (10.3) when we replace Q1 by n-Darlington
transistor (two BJT transistors (Qa, Qb), two resistors Ra, Rb and diode
Da). Consider that Qa and Qb transistors internal parameters are the same
afa ¼ afb ; ara ¼ arb ; etc. . . .
Chapter 6
Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems
Stability Analysis
1 pffiffi
is 180° is f ¼ 2pRC 6
. The circuit generates a sinusoidal wave at its output. The RC
phase shift network is used to form a positive feedback loop. Rb and Rc resistors
polarize the transistor Q1 for DC current, Rs is a separating resistor. R1 ¼ R2 ¼ R;
C1 ¼ C2 ¼ C3 ¼ C. Phase shift resonant circuit stability analysis is done by con-
sidering BJT Small Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. We consider “AC ground” in
the circuit. Since the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there is no time
variation of the voltage consequently. We can set this terminal to be an “AC ground”
in the small signal circuit. For AC ground, we “kill” the DC sources at that terminal
(short circuit voltage sources and open circuit current sources) [33, 34] (Fig. 6.2).
VA3 d VA
IR 2 ¼ ; IC3 ¼ IC2 þ IR2 ; IC2 ¼ C2 ðVA3 VA2 Þ; IR1 ¼ 2 ; IC2 ¼ IC1 þ IR1
R3 dt R1
d
IC1 ¼ C1 ðVA2 VA1 Þ; IRb þ IC1 ¼ Ir pi ; IRc ¼ IC3 þ IRs þ gm vBE ; vBE ¼ VA1
dt
IRc ¼ IC3 þ IRs þ gm VA1 ¼ IC3 þ IRs þ gm ½Vcc IRb Rb
Fig. 6.2 Phase shift resonator equivalent circuit (BJT small signal)
604 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
Vcc VA4
IRc ¼ ) IRc Rc ¼ Vcc VA4 ) VA4 ¼ Vcc IRc Rc
Rc
Vcc VA1
IRb ¼ ) IRb Rb ¼ Vcc VA1 ) VA1 ¼ Vcc IRb Rb
Rb
VA5
IRload ¼ ; IRload ¼ IRs ; VA5 ¼ IRload Rload ¼ IRs Rload
Rload
VA VA5
IR s ¼ 4 ) IRs Rs ¼ VA4 VA5 ¼ Vcc IRc Rc IRs Rload
Rs
V A1
IRs ðRs þ Rload Þ ¼ Vcc IRc Rc ; Ir pi ¼ ) V A1 ¼ I r pi r pi; Ir pi r pi ¼ Vcc IRb Rb
r pi
VA3 VA d
I R2 ¼ ) VA3 ¼ IR2 R3 ; IR1 ¼ 2 ) VA2 ¼ IR1 R1 ; IC3 ¼ C3 ðVcc IRc Rc IR2 R3 Þ
R3 R1 dt
X
2
IC3 ¼ IC2 þ IR2 ¼ Ir pi IRb þ IR1 þ IR2 ¼ Ir pi IRb þ IRk ;
k¼1
X
2
I C3 ¼ I r pi IRb þ IR k
k¼1
dIR1 dIRb
Ir pi IRb ¼ C1 ð R1 þ Rb Þ; Ir pi IR b þ IR 1
dt dt
dIR2 dIR1
¼ C2 ð R3 R1 Þ
dt dt
X
2
dIRc dIR2
Ir pi IRb þ IRk ¼ C3 ð Rc þ R3 Þ
k¼1
dt dt
Vcc Rc
IRs ðRs þ Rload Þ ¼ Vcc IRc Rc ) IRs ¼ IR c
ðRs þ Rload Þ ðRs þ Rload Þ
X
2
Vcc Rc
IRc ¼ Ir pi IR b þ IRk þ IR c þ gm ½Vcc IRb Rb
k¼1
ðRs þ Rload Þ ðRs þ Rload Þ
Rc X
2
Vcc
IRc ð1 þ Þ ¼ Ir pi IR b þ IRk þ þ gm
ðRs þ Rload Þ k¼1
ðRs þ Rload Þ
½Vcc IRb Rb
Vcc Rb
Ir pi r pi ¼ Vcc IRb Rb ) Ir pi ¼ IRb
r pi r pi
Rc Vcc Rb X2
Vcc
IRc ð1 þ Þ¼ IRb IR b þ IRk þ
ðRs þ Rload Þ r pi r pi k¼1
ðRs þ Rload Þ
þ gm ½Vcc IRb Rb
Rc 1 1 Rb
IRc ð1 þ Þ ¼ Vcc ½ þ þ gm IRb ½ þ1
ðRs þ Rload Þ r pi ðRs þ Rload Þ r pi
X
2
þ gm Rb þ IRk
k¼1
606 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
X
2
IRk
k¼1
½r Rbpi þ 1 þ gm Rb
C2 ðRb ; r pi; Rb ; . . .Þ ¼ ; C2 ¼ C2 ðRb ; r pi; Rb ; . . .Þ
ð1 þ ðRs þ Rload ÞÞ
Rc
1
C3 ðRc ; Rs ; . . .Þ ¼ ; C3 ¼ C3 ðRc ; Rs ; . . .Þ
ð1 þ ðRs þ Rload ÞÞ
Rc
Vcc Rb X2
dIR
ð Þ IRb IRb þ IRk ¼ C3 ð b C2 Rc þ C3 Rc
r pi r pi k¼1
dt
X dIR
2
dIR2
k
þ R3 Þ
k¼1
dt dt
Vcc Rb X2
dIR
ð Þ IRb IRb þ IRk ¼ C3 ð b C2 Rc þ C3 Rc
r pi r pi k¼1
dt
X2
dIRk dIR2
þ R3 Þ
k¼1
dt dt
Vcc Rb X2
dIRb dIR dIR
IR b ½ þ 1 þ IRk ¼ C2 C3 Rc C3 Rc C3 1 2
r pi r pi k¼1
dt dt dt
C3 ½C3 Rc þ R3
ðÞ ! ðÞ
Vcc Rb
IRb ½ þ 1 þ IR1
r pi r pi
dIR2 Vcc ½r Rbpi þ 1 dIRb Rb
¼ C2 ð R3 ½ IR b R1 Þ
dt r pi C1 R1 C1 R1 dt R1
608 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
ðÞ ! ð Þ
Vcc Rb X2
dIRb
IR b ½ þ 1 þ IR k ¼ C2 C3 Rc
r pi r pi k¼1
dt
Vcc ½r Rbpi þ 1 dIRb Rb dIR
C3 Rc C3 ½ IR b 2 C3 ½C3 Rc þ R3
r pi C1 R1 C 1 R1 dt R1 dt
Vcc Rb X2
dIRb C3 Rb
IRb ½ þ 1 þ IRk ¼ Rc C3 ½C2 þ
r pi r pi k¼1
dt R1
C3 Rc C3 Vcc C3 Rc C3 ½r Rbpi þ 1 dIR2
þ IRb C3 ½C3 Rc þ R3
r pi C1 R1 C1 R1 dt
C2 Rb C2 Rb
X1 ¼ ; X2 ¼ ½ þ 1 ½ þ 1; X3 ¼ ½ þ 1;
r pi C1 r pi C1 r pi
C3 Rb
X4 ¼ Rc C3 ½C2 þ
R1
C3 Rc C3 C3 Rc C3 ½r Rb
pi þ 1
X5 ¼ ; X6 ¼ ; X7 ¼ C3 ½C3 Rc þ R3
r pi C1 R1 C1 R1
Vcc X2
dIRb dIR
IR b X 3 þ IR k ¼ X4 Vcc X5 þ IRb X6 2 X7
r pi k¼1
dt dt
Vcc X2
dIRb dIR
IR b X 3 þ IR k ¼ X4 Vcc X5 þ IRb X6 2 X7
r pi k¼1
dt dt
R3 X4 dIR 1 ½r 1
pi þ X1 X4 X2 X4
½ þ X7 2 ¼ Vcc ð þ X 5 Þ þ IR b ½ X6 X3
Rb dt r pi Rb C 2 Rb C 2
X4
þ ½1 I R 1 þ IR 2
Rb C 2
½r 1
pi þ X1 X4
dIR2 ð Rb C2 r 1pi X5 Þ ½X6 þ X3 XRb2C
X4
¼ Vcc þ IRb 2
dt ½R3RXb 4 þ X7 ½R3RXb 4 þ X7
½RbXC4 2 1 1
þ IR1 IR2
½R3RXb 4 þ X7 ½R3RXb 4 þ X7
½ 1
pi þ X1 X4
ðr Rb C2 r 1pi X5 Þ
N1 ¼ N1 ðr pi; R3 ; Rb ; X1 ; X4 ; . . .Þ ¼
½R3RXb 4 þ X7
½X6 þ X3 XRb2C
X4
N2 ¼ N2 ðRb ; R3 ; X2 ; X3 ; X4 ; . . .Þ ¼ 2
; N3 ¼ N3 ðRb ; R3 ; X4 ; . . .Þ
½R3RXb 4 þ X7
½RbXC4 2 1
¼
½R3RXb 4 þ X7
1
N4 ¼ N4 ðR3 ; Rb ; X4 ; . . .Þ ¼
½R3RXb 4 þ X7
dIR2
¼ Vcc N1 þ IRb N2 þ N3 IR1 þ N4 IR2
dt
dIRb ½r pi þ X1
1
1 R3
¼ Vcc þ IR1 ½Vcc N1 þ IRb N2 þ N3 IR1
dt Rb C2 Rb C2 Rb
X2
þ N4 IR2 IRb
Rb C2
610 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
1 ½r pi þ X1
1
dIRb 1 1 R3
¼ Vcc ½ R3 N1 þ ½ N3 R3 IR1 N4 IR2
dt Rb C2 C2 Rb Rb
1 X2
IRb ½R3 N2 þ
Rb C2
1 ½r pi þ X1
1
N5 ¼ N5 ðr pi; Rb ; R3 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½ R3 N1
Rb C2
1 1 R3
N6 ¼ N6 ðN3 ; R3 ; Rb ; . . .Þ ¼ ½ N3 R3 ; N7 ¼ N7 ðN4 ; R3 ; . . .Þ ¼ N4
C2 Rb Rb
1 X2
N8 ¼ N8 ðR3 ; N2 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½R3 N2 þ ;
Rb C2
dIRb
¼ Vcc N5 þ N6 IR1 þ N7 IR2 þ IRb N8
dt
dIR1 1 Rb Rb Rb 1
¼ Vcc ½ N5 N6 IR1 N7 IR2 IRb
dt r pi C1 R1 R1 R1 R1 R1
½r Rbpi þ 1
½N8 Rb þ
C1
1 Rb
N9 ¼ N9 ðR1 ; Rb ; r pi; . . .Þ ¼ N5 ; N10 ¼ N10 ðRb ; R1 ; . . .Þ
r pi C1 R1 R1
Rb
¼ N6
R1
Rb
N11 ¼ N11 ðN7 ; Rb ; . . .Þ ¼ N7 ; N12 ¼ N12 ðN8 ; R1 ; Rb ; . . .Þ
R1
1 ½r Rbpi þ 1
¼ ½N8 Rb þ
R1 C1
dIR1
¼ Vcc N9 þ N10 IR1 þ N11 IR2 þ IRb N12
dt
6.1 A Resonator Circuit 180° Phase Shift … 611
dIR1 dIR
¼ Vcc N9 þ N10 IR1 þ N11 IR2 þ IRb N12 ; 2
dt dt
¼ Vcc N1 þ IRb N2 þ N3 IR1 þ N4 IR2
dIRb
¼ Vcc N5 þ N6 IR1 þ N7 IR2 þ IRb N8
dt
Phase shift resonator circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small
Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. We consider “AC ground” in the circuit. Since
the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there is no time variation of the
voltage. Consequently, we can set this terminal to be an “AC ground” in the small
signal circuit (Vcc = 0). Under AC and Small Signal (SS) conditions, the BJT is
replaced with linear Hybrid Pi model [26, 27].
dIR1 dIR
¼ N10 IR1 þ N11 IR2 þ IRb N12 ; 2 ¼ IRb N2 þ N3 IR1 þ N4 IR2
dt dt
dIRb
¼ N6 IR1 þ N7 IR2 þ IRb N8
dt
dIR1 dIR2 dIRb
At fixed points: dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼0
EðIR1 ; IR2 ; IRb Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0Þ. If Vcc 6¼ 0 then we get the following three equations
for system fixed points (equilibrium points):
N10 IR1 þ N11 IR2 þ IRb N12 ¼ Vcc N9 ; N3 IR1 þ N4 IR2 þ IRb N2 ¼ Vcc N1
N6 IR1 þ N7 IR2 þ IRb N8 ¼ Vcc N5
To use determinants to solve our system fixed points equations ðVcc 6¼ 0Þ with
three fixed points (Cramer’s Rule), IR1 ; IR2 ; IRb , four determinants must be formed
following the procedure:
(I) Write all fixed points equations in standard form.
(II) Create the denominator determinant, D, by using the coefficients of
IR1 ; IR2 ; IRb from the equations and evaluate it.
(III) Create the IR1 —numerator determinant, DIR , the IR2 —numerator determinant,
1
DIR , and the IRb —numerator determinant, DIR , by replacing the respective
2 b
IR1 ; IR2 , and IRb coefficients with the constants from the equations in standard
form and evaluate each determinant.
612 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
DI DI DI
The answers for IR1 ; IR2 , and IRb are as follow: IR1 ¼ DR1 ; IR2 ¼ DR2 ; IRb ¼ D
Rb
.
We solve this system of fixed point’s equations, using Cramer’s Rule.
0 1
N10 N11 N12
B C N4 N2 N3 N2 N3 N4
D ¼ det@ N3 N4 N2 A ¼ N10 det N11 det þ N12 det
N7 N8 N6 N8 N6 N7
N6 N7 N8
D ¼ N10 ðN4 N8 N7 N2 Þ N11 ðN3 N8 N6 N2 Þ þ N12 ðN3 N7 N6 N4 Þ
D ¼ N10 N4 N8 N10 N7 N2 N11 N3 N8 þ N11 N6 N2 þ N12 N3 N7 N12 N6 N4
0 1
N10 N11 Vcc N9
B C N4 Vcc N1
DIR ¼ det@ N3 N4 Vcc N1 A ¼ N10 det
b N7 Vcc N5
N6 N7 Vcc N5
N3 Vcc N1 N3 N4
N11 Vcc N9
N6 Vcc N5 N6 N7
Vcc N9 ðN3 N7 N6 N4 Þ
Vcc N9 N3 N7 þ Vcc N9 N6 N4
DI DI DI
Therefore, IR1 ¼ DR1 ; IR2 ¼ DR2 ; IRb ¼ DRb . If the denominator determinant, D,
has a value of zero, then system is either inconsistent or dependent. The system is
dependent if all the determinants have a value of zero. The system is inconsistent if
at least one of the determinants, DIR ; DIR or DIR has a value not equal to zero and
1 2 b
the denominator determinant has a value of zero.
Stability discussion:
0 dIR 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
N10 N11 N12 b1 ðIR1 ; tÞ IR1 ðt ¼ 0Þ
1
dt IR 1
B dIR2 C @
@ dt A ¼ N3 N4 N2 A @ IR2 A þ @ b2 ðIR2 ; tÞ A; @ IR2 ðt ¼ 0Þ A ¼ a0
dIRb N6 N7 N8 IR b b3 ðIRb ; tÞ IRb ðt ¼ 0Þ
dt
1 0
IR 1
We define the following notation: X ¼ @ IR2 A; X ¼ ðIR1 ; IR2 ; IRb Þ?
IR b
0 1
N10 N11 N12
A ¼ @ N3 N4 N2 A; b ¼ ðarray20cb1 b2 b3 Þ; b ¼ ðb1 ; b2 ; b3 Þ?
N6 N7 N8
X
3 X
3
detðA k IÞ ¼ !k kk ; detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 ) ! k kk ¼ 0
k¼0 k¼0
P
We get zeros of the polynomial 3k¼0 !k kk ¼ 0 with real coefficients !k .
P
The characteristic equation is a polynomial of degree N = 3: 3k¼0 !k kk ¼ 0:
We suppose k1 ; k2 ; k3 all (known) eigenvalues of the linearized system:
dXðtÞ
dt ¼ A XðtÞ; XðtÞ ¼ ðIR1 ðtÞIR2 ðtÞIRb ðtÞÞ. If one eigenvalue kk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3 has
a real part greater than zero kk [ 0; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; the perturbation will ultimately
increase and the steady state is thus unstable. To determine if all the eigenvalue
have a negative real part can be done by checking some conditions, known as the
Routh-Hurwitz criteria. In our case we define N = 3 matrices as follow:
Coefficients !k are real and fulfilling !k¼3 lie in the left half plane, if and only if,
all determinants: H1, H2, and H3 (with !m ¼ 0 for m [ 3; then !4 ¼ 0; !5 ¼ 0Þ are
positive. It is the condition for stability.
0 1
!1 !0 0
!1 !0
H1 ¼ ð!1 Þ; H2 ¼ ; H3 ¼ @ !3 !2 !1 A
!3 !2
!5 ¼ 0 !4 ¼ 0 !3
Stability criteria:
!1 !0
detðH1 Þ ¼ detð!1 Þ [ 0 ) !1 [ 0 ; det(H2 Þ ¼ det [0
!3 !2
) !1 !2 !3 !0 [ 0 ) !1 !2 [ !3 !0
0 1
!1 !0 0
B C
detðH3 Þ ¼ det@ !3 !2 !1 A [ 0 ) !1 !2 !3 !0 !23
!5 ¼ 0 !4 ¼ 0 !3
Y
3
¼ !k !0 !23 [ 0
k¼1
Y
3
!k !0 !23 ¼ !3 ð!1 !2 !0 !3 Þ [ 0
k¼1
We are interesting to get oscillations from the phase shift resonator circuit. To get
oscillations, we need eigenvalue of A is on imaginary axis, and then the method of
the center manifold is applied. The center manifold of an equilibrium point (fixed
point) of our dynamical system consists of orbits whose behavior around the
equilibrium point is not controlled by either the attraction of the stable manifold or
the repulsion of the unstable manifold. Phase shift resonator eigenvalues corre-
sponding to eigenvalues with negative real part form the stable Eigen space, which
gives rise to the stable manifold. Eigenvalue with positive real part yield the
unstable manifold. If there are eigenvalues whose real part is zero, then these give
rise to the center manifold. If the eigenvalues are precisely zero, then these more
specifically give rise to a slow manifold [3, 4].
The system matrix A defines three main subspaces:
(I) Stable subspace, which is spanned by our system generalized eigenvectors
corresponding to the eigenvalues λ with Re λ < 0.
(II) Unstable subspace, which is spanned by our system generalized eigenvectors
corresponding to the eigenvalues λ with Re λ > 0.
(III) Center subspace, which is spanned by our generalized eigenvectors corre-
sponding to the eigenvalues λ with Re λ = 0.
The options for sub spaces of interest include center-stable, center-unstable,
sub-center, slow, and fast subspaces. These subspaces are all invariant subspaces of
the system’s linear equations.
Center manifold theorem: The neighborhood may be chosen so that all solutions
of the system staying in the neighborhood tend exponentially to some solution on
the center manifold. A wide variety of initial conditions yields to solutions of the
full system which decay exponentially quickly to a solution on the relatively low
dimensional center manifold.
A good oscillator is stable in that its frequency and amplitude of oscillation do not
vary appreciably with temperature, process, power supply and external distur-
bances. The amplitude of oscillation is particularly stable, always returning to the
same value. LC tank oscillator is not a good oscillator. Due to loss, no matter how
small, the amplitude of the oscillator decays. Many oscillators can be viewed as
feedback systems. The oscillation is sustained by feeding back a fraction of the
output signal, using an amplifier to gain the signal, and then injecting the energy
back into the tank. The transistor “pushes” the LC tank with just about enough
energy to compensate for the loss. Typical oscillator feedback system is describes in
the below figure (Fig. 6.3).
618 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
We use for our stability analysis the BJT NPN transistor Small Signal
(SS) model equivalent circuit (Hybrid Pi model Version A). We consider “AC
ground” in the circuit. Since the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there
is no time variation of the voltage. Consequently, we can set this terminal to be an
“AC ground” in the small signal circuit. For AC ground, we “kill” the DC sources
at that terminal (short circuit voltage sources and open circuit current sources).
Transformer T1: vp—transformer primary voltage, vs—transformer secondary
voltage. ϕ is the flux through a one turn coil located anywhere on the transformer
core. np and ns are the number of turns of the coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary),
respectively, then the total flux ϕp and ϕs through coils 1 and 2 respectively
d/p d/s
are /p ¼ np /; /s ¼ ns /; vp ¼ dt ; vs ¼ dt ; vp ¼ np dt ; vs ¼ ns dt ; vp ðtÞ ¼
d/ d/
v ðtÞ n n v ðtÞ n
vp ; vs ðtÞ ¼ vs ; vps ðtÞ ¼ nps ; a ¼ nps . vps ðtÞ ¼ nps for all times t and for all voltages vp and vs
n
. We define the ratio between np and ns as “a” ða ¼ nps Þ. Step down transformer
a > 1 and step up transformer a < 1. By law of conservation of energy, apparent
real and reactive powers are each conserved in the input and output
qffiffiffiffi
v n L
ðS ¼ Ip vp ¼ Is vs Þ. Ideal transformer identity: vps ¼ IIps ¼ nps ¼ Lps ¼ a. np ¼ n;
vA2
¼ vn 0 ¼
v vp
ns ¼ 1; vps ¼ n; n [ 1 ) vs ¼ n n .
620 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
Fig. 6.6 Closed loop functioning oscillator with transformer T1 and Hybrid Pi model (version A)
v
vp ¼ v0 ¼ vA2 ; vs ¼ vi vA3 ; vi vA3 ¼ vn 0 ¼ nA2 (Reference directions are
in the top of each transformer’s coil). np ip þ ns is ¼ 0; ip ¼ ip ðtÞ; is ¼ is ðtÞ;
ip ðtÞ
is ðtÞ¼ nnps .
For all t and all currents ip and is . The voltage vp across coil 1 does not depend
on ip or on is ; it depends only on vs . Similarly the current ip depends only on is and
is independent of vp ; vs (Fig. 6.6).
Remark: When we have two coils of wire in close physical proximity to one
another, no importance whether or not the coils are wrapped around a common core
of magnetic material. We assume that the coils do not move with respect to one
another or with respect to a core they might be wrapped around. If we have some
ferromagnetic material in the magnetic circuit of the two coils, then when the
current sufficiently large, the relation between the fluxes /p ; /s and the currents
ip ; is are no longer linear. In this case the equations have the following form:
/p ¼ fp ðip ; is Þ; /s ¼ fs ðip ; is Þ, where fp ðip ; is Þ; fs ðip ; is Þ are nonlinear functions of the
currents ip ; is , By Faraday’s law we get the following:
@f @f @fs @fs
The four partial derivatives ð@ipp ; @ips ; @i ; Þ are function of ip ; is (Fig. 6.7).
p @is
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis … 621
KCL at nodes A1, A2, A3, and A4 gives the below results (Table 6.2):
np ip þ ns is ¼ 0; np ¼ n; ns ¼ 1; n ip þ is ¼ 0 ) is ¼ n ip ; n [ 1
dIRe VA VA
ICe ¼ Ce Re ; IR1 ¼ 3 ) VA3 ¼ IR1 R1 ; IR2 ¼ 3 ) VA3 ¼ IR2 R2
dt R1 R2
VA1 IRe Re
Ir pi ¼ ) VA1 ¼ Ir pi r pi þ IRe Re ; IRL RL
r pi
¼ ðIr pi r pi þ IRe Re IR2 R2 Þ n
r pi Re RL
IR2 ¼ Ir pi þ IRe þ IR L ; is ¼ n ip ; n [ 1
R2 R2 n R2
dIr pi dIr pi n 1
n ip þ Cpi r pi þ Ir pi ¼0) ¼ ip Ir pi
dt dt Cpi r pi Cpi r pi
dIRL dIRL
gm I r pi r pi þ IRL þ CL RL ip ¼ 0 )
dt dt
gm r pi 1
¼ Ir pi
CL RL CL RL
1
IRL þ ip
CL RL
r pi Re RL dIR
IR 1 þ Ir pi þ IRe þ IR L þ C1 R1 1 þ n ip ¼ 0
R2 R2 n R2 dt
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis … 623
dIR1 r pi Re RL
C1 R1 ¼ IR1 Ir pi IRe IRL n ip
dt R2 R2 n R2
dIR1 1 r pi Re RL
¼ IR1 Ir pi IRe IRL
dt C1 R1 Q
2 Q
2 Q
2
C1 Rk C1 Rk n C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
n
ip
C1 R1
dIr pi dIR
gm I r pi r pi þ Ir pi þ Cpi r pi ¼ IRe þ Ce Re e
dt dt
n 1
gm Ir pi r pi þ Ir pi þ Cpi r pi ½ ip Ir pi
Cpi r pi Cpi r pi
dIRe
¼ IRe þ Ce Re
dt
dIRe gm r pi n 1
¼ Ir pi þ ip IRe
dt Ce Re Ce Re Ce Re
dIr pi n 1
¼ ip Ir pi
dt Cpi r pi Cpi r pi
dIRL gm r pi 1 1
¼ Ir pi IRL þ ip
dt CL RL CL RL CL RL
dIR1 1 r pi Re RL
¼ IR1 Ir pi IRe IRL
dt C1 R1 Q
2 Q
2 Q
2
C1 Rk C1 Rk n C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
n
ip
C1 R1
dIRe gm r pi n 1
¼ Ir pi þ ip IRe
dt Ce Re Ce Re Ce Re
dIr dIRL dIR1
At fixed points (equilibrium points): dt
pi
¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; dIdtRe ¼ 0
gm r pi 1 1
Ir ¼ n ip ; I IRL þ i ¼ 0
pi
CL RL r pi
CL RL CL RL p
624 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
r pi Re RL
IRL ¼ ip ð1 gm r pi nÞ; IR1 Ir IRe IRL n ip ¼ 0
pi
R2 R2 n R2
Re r pi RL
IR1 þ IRe ¼ ip ½n þ ð1 gm r pi nÞ þ n
R2 R2 n R2
gm r pi n 1
I þ i I ¼ 0
Ce Re r pi
Ce Re p Ce Re Re
gm r pi n 1
n ip þ ip I ¼ 0 ) IRe ¼ ip n ½gm r pi þ 1
Ce Re Ce Re Ce Re Re
Re r pi RL
IR1 þ IRe ¼ ip ½n þ ð1 gm r pi nÞ þ n
R2 R2 n R2
r pi RL Re
IR1 ¼ ip fn þ ð1 gm r pi nÞ þ n þ n ½gm r pi þ 1 g
R2 n R2 R2
Eðip ; Ir
¼ fip ; n ip ; ip ð1 gm r pi nÞ;
pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe Þ
r pi RL Re
ip fn þ ð1 gm r pi nÞ þ n þ n ½gm r pi þ 1 g;
R2 n R2 R2
ip n ½gm r pi þ 1g
Eðip ; Ir
¼ ip f1; n; ð1 gm r pi nÞ;
pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe Þ
r pi RL Re
fn þ ð1 gm r pi nÞ þ n þ n ½gm r pi þ 1 g;
R2 n R2 R2
n ½gm r pi þ 1g
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the closed loop functioning oscillator circuit (BJT transistor
small signal model) consists in adding to coordinate ½ip ; Ir pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe arbitrarily
small increments of exponentially form ½i0p ; ir pi ; iRL ; iR1 ; iRe ekt and retaining the
first order terms in ip ; Ir pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe . The system of homogenous equations leads
to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues [4]. The polynomial
characteristic equations accept by set of the below circuit variables, circuit variables
derivative and circuit variables second order derivative with respect to time into
closed loop functioning oscillator circuit [2, 3, 4]. Our closed loop functioning
oscillator circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½i0p ; ir pi ; iRL ; iR1 ; iRe ekt are: j = 0 (first fixed point), j = 1 (second fixed point),
j = 2(third fixed point), etc.,
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis … 625
ðjÞ ðjÞ
ip ðtÞ ¼ ipðjÞ þ i0p ekt ; Ir pi ðtÞ ¼ Ir pi þ ir pi ekt ; IRL ðtÞ ¼ IRL þ iRL ekt ; IR1 ðtÞ
ðjÞ
¼ IR1 þ iR1 ekt
n 1 ðjÞ
ir pi k ekt ¼ ½iðjÞ þ i0p ekt ½I þ ir pi ekt
Cpi r pi p Cpi r pi r pi
n 1 ðjÞ n
ir pi k ekt ¼ iðjÞ I þ i0 ekt
Cpi r pi p Cpi r pi r pi Cpi r pi p
1
ir pi ekt
Cpi r pi
ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point n
Cpi r pi ip Cpi r1 pi Ir pi ¼0
n 1
i0 ir pi ir pi k¼0
Cpi r pi p Cpi r pi
dIRL gm r pi 1 1
¼ Ir pi IRL þ ip
dt CL RL CL RL CL RL
gm r pi ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1
iRL k ekt ¼ ½Ir pi þ ir pi ekt ½I þ iRL ekt þ
CL RL CL RL RL CL RL
½ip þ ip ekt
ðjÞ 0
gm r pi ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ 1
iRL k ekt ¼ Ir pi IR L þ iðjÞ
CL RL CL RL CL RL p
gm r pi 1 1
ir pi ekt iR ekt þ i0 ekt
CL RL CL RL L CL RL p
ðjÞ ðjÞ ðjÞ
At fixed point gCm rL RLpi Ir pi CL1RL IRL þ 1
CL RL ip ¼ 0
626 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
gm r pi 1 1
ir pi þ i0 iR iRL k ¼ 0
CL RL CL RL p CL RL L
dIR1 1 r pi Re RL
¼ IR1 Ir pi IRe IRL
dt C1 R1 Q
2 Q
2 Q
2
C1 Rk C1 Rk n C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
n
ip
C1 R1
1 ðjÞ ðjÞ r pi
iR1 k ekt ¼ ½I þ iR1 ekt ½Ir pi þ ir pi ekt
C1 R1 R1 Q
2
C1 Rk
k¼1
ðjÞ Re ðjÞ RL
½IRe þ iRe ekt ½IRL þ iRL ekt
Q
2 Q
2
C1 Rk n C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1
n
½iðjÞ þ i0p ekt
C1 R1 p
1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ r pi
iR1 k ekt ¼ IR1 iR ekt Ir pi
C1 R1 C1 R1 1 Q
2
C1 Rk
k¼1
r pi ðjÞ Re Re
ir pi ekt IRe iRe ekt
Q
2 Q
2 Q
2
C1 Rk C1 Rk C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
ðjÞ RL RL
IRL iRL ekt
Q
2 Q
2
n C1 Rk n C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1
n n
iðjÞ i0 ekt
C1 R1 p C1 R1 p
1 ðjÞ ðjÞ r pi ðjÞ Re ðjÞ RL
iR1 k ekt ¼ I Ir pi IR e IR L
C1 R1 R1 Q
2 Q
2 Q
2
C1 Rk C1 Rk n C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1 k¼1
n 1 r pi
iðjÞ iR ekt ir pi ekt
C 1 R1 p C 1 R1 1 Q
2
C1 Rk
k¼1
Re kt RL n
iRe e iRL ekt i0 ekt
Q
2 Q
2 C 1 R1 p
C1 Rk n C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1
6.2 Closed Loop Functioning Oscillator Stability Analysis … 627
At fixed point
1 r pi Re
iR iR1 k ir pi iRe
C1 R1 1 Q
2 Q
2
C1 Rk C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1
RL n
iRL i0 ¼ 0
Q
2 C1 R1 p
n C1 Rk
k¼1
dIRe gm r pi n 1
¼ Ir pi þ ip IRe
dt Ce Re Ce Re Ce Re
gm r pi ðjÞ n 1
iRe k ekt ¼ ½Ir pi þ ir pi ekt þ ½ipðjÞ þ i0p ekt
Ce Re Ce Re Ce Re
ðjÞ
½IRe þ iRe ekt
gm r pi ðjÞ gm r pi n n
iRe k ekt ¼ Ir pi þ ir pi ekt þ ipðjÞ þ i0 ekt
C e Re Ce Re Ce Re Ce Re p
1 ðjÞ 1
IRe iR ekt
C e Re C e Re e
gm r pi ðjÞ n 1 ðjÞ
iRe k ekt ¼ I þ iðjÞ I
Ce Re r pi Ce Re p Ce Re Re
gm r pi n 1
þ ir pi ekt þ i0p ekt iR ekt
Ce Re Ce Re Ce Re e
gm r pi n 1
ir pi þ i0 iR iRe k ¼ 0
Ce Re Ce Re p Ce Re e
n 1
i0p ir pi ir pi k¼0
Cpi r pi Cpi r pi
628 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
gm r pi 1 1
ir pi þ i0 iR iRL k ¼ 0
CL RL CL RL p CL RL L
1 r pi Re
iR iR1 k ir pi iRe
C1 R1 1 Q
2 Q
2
C1 Rk C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1
RL n
iRL i0 ¼ 0
Q
2 C1 R1 p
n C1 Rk
k¼1
gm r pi n 1
ir pi þ i0 iR iRe k ¼ 0
Ce Re Ce Re p Ce Re e
0 n 1
0 1 Cpi r pi
N11 ... N14 B 1 C
B . .. .. C B C R C 0
B . C B L L C i ¼ 0;
@ . . . A ir pi iRL iR1 iRe þ B n C p
@ C1 R1 A
N41 N44 n
Ce Re
0 1 0 ir pi 1
N11 ... N14
B . B i C
B . .. .. C
CB RL C
@ . . . A B C0
@ iR1 A
N41 N44 i Re
1 gm r pi
N11 ¼ k; N12 ¼ N13 ¼ N14 ¼ 0; N21 ¼ ;
Cpi r pi CL RL
1
N22 ¼ k
CL RL
r pi RL 1
N23 ¼ N24 ¼ 0; N31 ¼ ; N32 ¼ ; N33 ¼ k
Q
2 Q
2 C1 R1
C1 Rk n C1 Rk
k¼1 k¼1
Re gm r pi 1
N34 ¼ ; N41 ¼ ; N42 ¼ N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k
Q
2 Ce Re Ce Re
C1 Rk
k¼1
0 1
n
Cpi r pi
0 1
B 1 C N11 . . . N14
B C R C 0 B . .. .. C
B L L C i ! e; ðA k IÞ ¼ B . C
B n C p @ . . . A;
@ C1 R1 A
n N41 N44
Ce Re
0 1
N11 . . . N14
B . .. .. C
detðA k IÞ ¼ detB
@ .. .
C
. A
N41 N44
1 1 1 1
detðA k IÞ ¼ k4 þ k3 ½ þ þ þ
C1 R1 Ce Re Cpi r pi CL RL
1 1 1 1 1
þ k2 ½ þð þ Þð þ Þ
C1 R1 Ce Re Cpi r pi CL RL C 1 R1 C e Re
1 1 1 1
þ þ k f½ þ
Cpi r pi CL RL Cpi r pi CL RL C1 R1 Ce Re
1 1 1
þ½ þ g
C1 R1 Ce Re Cpi r pi CL RL
1
þ
Cpi r pi CL RL C1 R1 Ce Re
1 1 1 1
!4 ¼ 1; !3 ¼ þ þ þ
C1 R1 Ce Re Cpi r pi CL RL
1 1 1
!2 ¼ þð þ Þ
C1 R1 Ce Re Cpi r pi CL RL
1 1 1
ð þ Þþ
C1 R1 Ce Re Cpi r pi CL RL
1 1 1 1 1
!1 ¼ ½ þ þ½ þ
Cpi r pi CL RL C1 R1 Ce Re C1 R1 Ce Re
1
Cpi r pi CL RL
1 X
4
!0 ¼ ; detðA k IÞ ¼ !k kk
Cpi r pi CL RL C1 R1 Ce Re k¼0
The general rule is that the closed loop functioning oscillator circuit is stable if
there is no eigenvalue with positive real part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is
positive for the steady state to be unstable. Our 5-variables ðip ; Ir pi ; IRL ; IR1 ; IRe Þ
system has four eigenvalues (reduce to four system arbitrarily small increments).
The type of behavior can be characterized as a function of the position of these
eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be distinguished:
(1) the four eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), (2) the four
eigenvalues are real, two of them are negative (unstable steady state), (3) and
(4) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and other two
real are negative (stable steady state), two cases can be distinguished depending on
the relative value of the real part of the complex eigenvalues and of the real one,
(5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and the other
two real are positive (unstable steady state) [2, 3].
X
4 X
4
detðA k IÞ ¼ !k kk ; detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 ) ! k kk ¼ 0
k¼0 k¼0
There are types of transistor oscillators which use feedback and lumped inductance
and capacitance resonators. These oscillators are like their low frequency coun-
terparts and very small values of inductance and capacitance must be used to make
them resonate at microwave frequencies. A common base configuration is used for
oscillators, although common emitter configurations can be used. The transistor
input and output are matched and feedback is supplied from the output to the input.
The feedback circuit contains the resonator, which controls the oscillation fre-
quency. There are three types of transistor LC oscillators, Colpitts, Hartley and
Clapp. These oscillators differ only in the way that the feedback is applied. In the
6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 631
Hartley oscillator, the feedback is supplied by the inductive divider formed by two
inductors. The advantages of the Hartley oscillator are oscillator’s frequency may
be adjusted using a single variable capacitor (one side of which can be earthed),
oscillator’s output amplitude remains constant over the frequency range, either a
tapped coil or two fixed inductors are needed, and easy to create an accurate fixed
frequency crystal oscillator variation (it is done by replacing the capacitor with a
quartz crystal). The disadvantage of Hartley oscillator is the fact that harmonic rich
output if taken from the amplifier and not directly from the LC circuit. Basic LC
oscillator circuits have no means of controlling the amplitude of the oscillations and
it is difficult to tune the oscillator to the required frequency. Hartley Oscillator
configuration has a tuned tank circuit with its resonant coil tapped to feed a fraction
of the output signal back to the emitter of the transistor. The output of the transistors
emitter is always “in-phase” with the output at the collector, this feedback signal is
positive. The oscillating frequency which is a sine-wave voltage is determined by
the resonance frequency of the tank circuit [9, 10] (Fig. 6.8).
Resistor R1 provide the usual stabilizing DC bias for the transistor. L1 is the Radio
Frequency Coil (RFC). It is an RF Choke which has a high reactance at the fre-
quency of oscillations so most of the RF current is applied to the LC tanking circuit
via capacitor C2 and the DC component passes through L1 to the power supply. We
use for our stability analysis the BJT NPN transistor Small Signal (SS) model
equivalent circuit (Hybrid Pi model Version A). We consider “AC ground” in the
circuit. Since the voltage at this terminal is held constant at Vcc, there is no time
variation of the voltage. Consequently, we can set this terminal to be an “AC
ground” in the small signal circuit. For AC ground, we “kill” the DC sources at that
terminal (short circuit voltage sources and open circuit current sources). (Fig. 6.9).
VL1 ¼ VA1 ; VL3 ¼ VA3 ; VL2 ¼ VA4 ; VC3 ¼ VA4 VA3 ; vbe ¼ VA2 ;
dIL
VA1 ¼ VL1 ¼ L1 1 ; VC2 ¼ VA1 VA4
dt
dðVA1 VA4 Þ dIL
I C2 ¼ C 2 ; VL2 ¼ VA4 ¼ L2 2 ;
dt dt
dIL3
V L3 ¼ VA3 ¼ L3 ; VC1 ¼ VA2 VA3
dt
KCL @ node A1: IR1 þ gm vbe þ IC2 þ IL1 ¼ 0, KCL @ node A2:
IR1 ¼ IC1 þ ICpi þ Ir pi
KCL @ node A3: IC1 þ IC3 ¼ IL3 , KCL @ node A4: IC2 ¼ IL2 þ IC3
Z
dIL1 dðVA1 VA4 Þ 1
VA1 ¼ VL1 ¼ L1 ; IC2 ¼ C2 ) VA1 VA4 ¼ IC2 dt;
dt dt C2
Z
1
VA4 ¼ VA1 IC2 dt
C2
Z
d 1 dVA4 dVA1 1
fVA4 ¼ VA1 IC2 dtg ) ¼ I C2 ;
dt C2 dt dt C2
Z
dIL 1
VA4 ¼ L1 1 IC2 dt
dt C2
Z
dIL2 dIL dIL 1 d 2 I L2
VA4 ¼ L2 ) L2 2 ¼ L1 1 IC2 dt; L2
dt dt dt C2 dt2
2
d IL 1
¼ L1 2 1 I C2
dt C2
Z
dIL3 dðVA2 VA3 Þ 1
VA3 ¼ L3 ; IC1 ¼ C1 ) VA2 VA3 ¼ IC1 dt;
dt dt C1
Z
1
VA2 ¼ VA3 þ IC1 dt
C1
Z Z
dIL3 1 dVA2 1
VA2 ¼ L3 þ IC1 dt; ICpi ¼ Cpi ) VA2 ¼ ICpi dt
dt C1 dt Cpi
Z Z Z
1 dIL3 1 d 1
ICpi dt ¼ L3 þ IC dt; f ICpi dt
Cpi dt C1 Z 1 dt Cpi
dIL3 1
¼ L3 þ IC1 dtg
dt C1
1 d 2 IL 1 VA2
ICpi ¼ L3 2 3 þ I C1 ; I r pi ¼ ) VA2 ¼ Ir pi r pi;
Cpi dt C1 r pi
VA VA2
IR1 ¼ 1
R1
634 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
dIL1 r pi R1 1 d 2 IL 1
¼ Ir pi þ IR1 ; ICpi ¼ L3 2 3 þ I C1
dt L1 L1 Cpi dt C1
dIL2 dIr
We define for simplicity the following new variables: dt ¼ Y1 ; dt
pi
¼ Y2
IC2 ¼ IL1 gm r pi Ir pi IR1 ; ICpi ¼ IR1 IC1 Ir pi ; IC1 ¼ IL3 IC3 ; IC3 ¼ IC2 IL2
IC1 ¼ IL3 ½IC2 IL2 ¼ IL3 IC2 þ IL2 ; IC1 ¼ IL3 þ IL2 ½IL1 gm r pi Ir pi IR1
X
3
IC1 ¼ IL3 þ IL2 þ IL1 þ gm r pi Ir pi þ IR1 ; IC1 ¼ ILk þ gm r pi Ir pi þ IR1
k¼1
6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 635
X3
ICpi ¼ IR1 Ir pi ½ ILk þ gm r pi Ir pi þ IR1 ;
k¼1
X
3
ICpi ¼ Ir pi ½1 þ gm r pi I Lk
k¼1
&&&
dY1 r pi R1 1
¼ Y2 þ Y3 I C2
dt L2 L2 C2 L2
r pi R1 1
¼ Y2 þ Y3 ½IL1 gm r pi Ir pi IR1
L2 L2 C2 L2
dY1 r pi R1 1 1 1
¼ Y2 þ Y3 þ I L1 þ gm r pi Ir pi þ IR1
dt L2 L2 C2 L2 C2 L2 C2 L2
dY4 1 X
3
¼ ½Ir pi ½1 þ gm r pi I Lk
dt Cpi L3 k¼1
1 X
3
½ IL þ gm r pi Ir pi þ IR1
C1 L3 k¼1 k
dY4 Ir pi ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 X 3
¼ ð þ Þ½ þ IL
dt L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1
IR1
C1 L3
dY4 Ir pi ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 X 3
¼ ð þ Þ½ þ IL
dt L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1
IR1
C1 L3
636 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
At fixed points:
1 1 1
I þ gm r pi Ir þ I ¼ 0
C2 L2 L1 C2 L2 pi
C2 L2 R1
Ir pi ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 X 3
1
ð þ Þ½ þ I I ¼ 0
L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Lk C1 L3 R1
IL1 þ IR1 ð1 gm R1 Þ ¼ 0
R1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 1 X 3
IR1 f ð þ Þ g½ þ I
r pi L3 Cpi C1 C1 L3 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Lk
¼0
R1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 1
IR1 f ð þ Þ g½ þ
r pi L3 Cpi C1 C1 L 3 Cpi C1 L3
X3
½IL1 þ ILk ¼ 0
k¼2
X
3 X
3
ILk ¼ IL1 þ ILk ; IL1 þ IR1 ð1 gm R1 Þ ¼ 0 ) IL1 ¼ IR1 ð1 gm R1 Þ
k¼1 k¼2
R1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 1
IR1 f ð þ Þ g½ þ IL1
r pi L3 Cpi C1 C1 L3 Cpi C1 L3
1 1 1 X 3
½ þ I ¼0
Cpi C1 L3 k¼2 Lk
6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 637
R1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 ð1 gm R1 Þ
IR1 f ð þ Þ gþ½ þ IR1
r pi L3 Cpi C1 C1 L 3 Cpi C1 L3
1 1 1 X 3
½ þ I ¼ 0
Cpi C1 L3 k¼2 Lk
R1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 ð1 gm R1 Þ
IR1 f ð þ Þ þ½ þ g
r pi L3 Cpi C1 C1 L3 Cpi C1 L3
1 1 1 X 3
½ þ I ¼ 0
Cpi C1 L3 k¼2 Lk
P
3
½C1pi þ C1
1
L13 ILk
IR1
k¼2
¼ R1
r piL3 ð½1 þ gCmpir pi
þ gm r pi
C1 Þ 1
C1 L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1
1
ð1gLm3 R1 Þ
P
3
ð1 gm R1 Þ ½C1pi þ C1
1
L13 ILk
IL1 ¼
k¼2
R1
r piL3 ð½1 þ gCmpir pi
þ gm r pi
C1 Þ C11L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1
1
ð1gLm3 R1 Þ
P
3
r R1pi ½C1pi þ C1
1
L13 ILk
Ir
k¼2
¼
ð½1 þ gCmpir gm r pi
ð1gLm3 R1 Þ
pi pi
R1
r piL3 þ C1 Þ C11L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1
1
We can define our system fixed points as E ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Ir
pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 ; IL3 Þ
We define three global parameters in our system: C1 ; C2 ; C3
½C1pi þ C1
1
L13
C1 ¼ R1
r piL3 ð½1 þ gCmpir pi
þ gm r pi
C1 Þ C11L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1
1
ð1gLm3 R1 Þ
ð1 gm R1 Þ ½C1pi þ C1
1
L13
C2 ¼ R1
r piL3 ð½1 þ gCmpir pi
þ gm r pi
C1 Þ C11L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1
1
ð1gLm3 R1 Þ
r R1pi ½C1pi þ C1
1
L13
C3 ¼ R1
r piL3 ð½1 þ gCmpir pi
þ gm r pi
C1 Þ C11L3 þ ½C1pi þ C1
1
ð1gLm3 R1 Þ
638 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
X
3 X
3
IR1 ¼ C1 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ ILk ; IL1 ¼ C2 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ ILk
k¼2 k¼2
X
3
Ir pi ¼ C3 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ ILk
k¼2
X
3
E ðY1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Ir
pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 ; IL3 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0; C3 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ ILk ;
k¼2
X
3 X
3
C1 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ ILk ; C2 ðR1 ; r pi; C1 ; Cpi ; . . .Þ ILk ; IL2 ; IL3 Þ
k¼2 k¼2
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the Hartley oscillator circuit (BJT transistor small signal
model) consists in adding to coordinate [Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Ir pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 ; IL3 ] arbi-
trarily small increments of exponentially form ½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ; ir pi ; iR1 ; iL1 ; iL2 ; iL3
ekt and retaining the first order terms in Y1 ; Y2 ; Y3 ; Y4 ; Ir pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 ; IL3 . The
system of homogenous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in
the eigenvalues [4]. The polynomial characteristic equations accept by set of the
below circuit variables, circuit variables derivative and circuit variables second
order derivative with respect to time into Hartley oscillator circuit [2, 3, 4]. Our
Hartley oscillator fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½y1 ; y2 ; y3 ; y4 ; ir pi ; iR1 ; iL1 ; iL2 ; iL3 ekt are: j = 0(first fixed point), j = 1(second
fixed point), j = 2(third fixed point), etc.,
ðjÞ ðjÞ
Ir pi ðtÞ ¼ Ir pi þ ir pi ekt ; IR1 ðtÞ ¼ IR1 þ iR1 ekt ;
ðjÞ ðjÞ
IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ekt ; IL2 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 þ iL2 ekt
&&&
dY1 r pi R1 1 1 1
¼ Y2 þ Y3 þ IL þ gm r pi Ir pi þ IR1
dt L2 L2 C2 L2 1 C2 L2 C2 L2
r pi
ðjÞ ðjÞ R1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
y1 k ekt ¼ Y2 þ Y3 þ I L1 þ gm r pi Ir pi
L2 L2 C2 L2 C2 L2
1 ðjÞ r pi kt R1 1
þ I þ y2 e þ y3 ekt þ iL ekt
C2 L2 R1 L2 L2 C2 L2 1
1 1
þ gm r pi ir pi ekt þ iR ekt
C2 L2 C2 L2 1
At fixed point:
r pi kt R1 1
y1 k ekt þ y2 e þ y3 ekt þ iL ekt
L2 L2 C2 L2 1
1 1
þ gm r pi ir pi ekt þ iR ekt ¼ 0
C2 L2 C2 L2 1
r pi R1 1 1
y1 k þ y2 þ y3 þ iL þ gm r pi ir pi
L2 L2 C2 L2 1 C2 L2
1
þ iR ¼ 0
C2 L2 1
dY4 Ir pi ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 X 3
¼ ð þ Þ½ þ IL
dt L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1
IR1
C1 L3
640 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
1 ðjÞ ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi
y4 k ekt ¼ ½I ekt ð
þ ir pi þ Þ
L3 r pi Cpi C1
1 1 1 X 3
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½ þ ðI þ iLk ekt Þ ½I þ iR1 ekt
Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Lk C1 L3 R1
1 ðjÞ ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi
y4 k ekt ¼ Ir pi ð þ Þ
L3 Cpi C1
1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi
ir pi ð þ Þ ekt
L3 Cpi C1
1 1 1 X 3
ðjÞ 1 1 1 X 3
½ þ I Lk ½ þ iL ekt
Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1 ðjÞ 1
IR1 iR ekt
C1 L3 C1 L3 1
1 ðjÞ ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi
y4 k ekt ¼ I ð þ Þ
L3 r pi Cpi C1
1 1 1 X 3
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½ þ I I
Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Lk C1 L3 R1
1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi
ir pi ð þ Þ ekt
L3 Cpi C1
1 1 1 X 3
1
½ þ iL ekt iR ekt
Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k C1 L3 1
At fixed point:
1 ðjÞ ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 X 3
ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
Ir pi ð þ Þ½ þ I I
L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 Lk C1 L3 R1
¼0
1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1
y4 k ekt ¼ ir pi ð þ Þ ekt ½ þ
L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3
X3
1
iLk ekt iR1 ekt
k¼1
C 1 L 3
6.3 Hartley Oscillator Stability Analysis 641
1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 X 3
y4 k ir pi ð þ Þ½ þ iL
L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1
iR ¼ 0
C1 L3 1
At fixed point:
dIL1 r pi R1
¼ Ir pi þ IR1 ; iL1 k ekt
dt L1 L1
ðjÞ kt r pi ðjÞ R1
¼ ½Ir pi þ ir pi e þ ½IR1 þ iR1 ekt
L1 L1
At fixed point :
ðjÞ r pi ðjÞ R1
Ir pi þ IR 1 ¼ 0:
L1 L1
r pi R1 1 1
y1 k þ y2 þ y3 þ iL þ gm r pi ir pi
L2 L2 C2 L2 1 C2 L2
1
þ iR ¼ 0
C2 L2 1
642 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi 1 1 1 X 3
y4 k ir pi ð þ Þ½ þ iL
L3 Cpi C1 Cpi C1 L3 k¼1 k
1
iR ¼ 0
C1 L3 1
r pi R1
iL1 k þ ir pi þ iR1 ¼0
L1 L1
0 1 0 r pi R1 1
y1 L2 L2
B y C B C
0 1 B
B
4 C
C B
B 0 0C
C
N11 ... N17 B ir pi C B 0C
B . B C B 1 C y
B . .. .. CCB C B C 2
@ . . . A B R1 C
B i þB 0 1 C ¼ 0;
C B C y3
B iL C B C
N71 N77 B 1 C B 0 0C
B C B C
@ i L2 A @ 0 0A
i L3 0 0
0 1
y1
B y C
0 1 B
B
4 C
C
N11 ... N17 B ir pi C
B . C B C
B . .. .. C B C
@ . . . AB
B
iR1 C 0
C
B iL C
N71 N77 B 1 C
B C
@ i L2 A
i L3
1
N15 ¼ ; N16 ¼ N17 ¼ 0; N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ k;
C2 L2
1 ½1 þ gm r pi gm r pi
N23 ¼ ð þ Þ
L3 Cpi C1
1 1 1 1
N24 ¼ ; N25 ¼ N26 ¼ N27 ¼ ½ þ ; N31 ¼ N32 ¼ 0; N33 ¼ k
C1 L3 Cpi C1 L3
N34 ¼ N35 ¼ N36 ¼ N37 ¼ 0; N41 ¼ N42 ¼ N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k; N45 ¼ N46 ¼ N47
¼0
r pi R1
N51 ¼ N52 ¼ 0; N53 ¼ ; N54 ¼ ; N55 ¼ k; N56 ¼ N57 ¼ 0; N61 ¼ 1; N62
L1 L1
¼0
N63 ¼ N64 ¼ N65 ¼ 0; N66 ¼ k; N67 ¼ 0; N71 ¼ 0; N72 ¼ 1; N73 ¼ N74 ¼ N75
¼ N76 ¼ 0
0 1
N11 . . . N17
B .. .. .. C
N77 ¼ k; ðA k IÞ ¼ @ . . . A ; detðA k IÞ
0 N
171 N77
N11 . . . N17
B .. .. .. C
¼ det@ . . . A
N71 N77
1 1 1
detðA k IÞ ¼ k7 k5 ½ þ ; detðA k IÞ
Cpi C1 L3
1 1 1
¼ k5 ðk2 þ ½ þ Þ
Cpi C1 L3
VL2 ¼ VA4 VA3 ; VC1 ¼ VA2 VA3 ; VA2 ¼ VCpi ; VR1 ¼ VA1 VA2 ; VL1 ¼ VA1 ; IC1
dðVA2 VA3 Þ
¼ C1
dt
646 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
KCL @ node A1: IR1 þ gm vbe þ IL1 þ IC2 ¼ 0; KCL @ node A2:
IR1 ¼ IC1 þ ICpi þ Ir pi
KCL @ node A3: IC1 þ IL2 ¼ IC4 ; KCL @ node A4: IC2 ¼ IC3 þ IL2
d 2 I L1 1 1 dðVA2 VA3 Þ
L1 IC3 ¼ IC ; IC ¼ C1 ) VA2 VA3
dt2 C3 C2 Z 2 1 dt
1
¼ IC1 dt
C1
Z Z Z
1 1 d 1
Ir pi r pi IC4 dt ¼ IC dt; fI r pi r pi IC4 dt
C4 C1 Z 1 dt C4
1
¼ IC1 dtg
C1
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 647
dIr pi 1 1
r pi IC4 ¼ I C1
dt C4 C1
dIL1 1 1 d 2 IL
L1 Ir pi r pi ¼ IR1 R1 ; I C3 IC4 ¼ L2 2 2
dt C3 C4 dt
d 2 I L1 1 1 dIr pi 1 1
L1 2
I C3 ¼ I C2 ; r pi IC4 ¼ I C1
dt C3 C2 dt C4 C1
d 2 I L1 1 1 dIR R1 dIr pi r pi
¼ I C2 þ I C3 ; 1 þ
dt2 C2 L1 C3 L1 dt L1 dt L1
1 1
¼ I C2 þ I C3
C2 L1 C3 L1
dIR1 1 1 1 1
R1 þ ½ I C1 þ IC4 r pi ¼ I C2 þ I C3
dt C1 r pi C4 r pi C2 C3
dIR1 1 1 1 1
¼ I C2 þ IC3 I C1 IC4
dt C2 R1 C3 R1 C1 R1 C4 R1
dIR1 1 1 1 1 dIL
¼ I C2 þ I C3 I C1 I C4 ; 1
dt C2 R1 C3 R1 C1 R1 C4 R1 dt
R1 r pi
¼ IR 1 þ Ir pi
L1 L1
648 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
X
2
IC4 ¼ IR1 ICpi Ir pi þ IL2 ; IC3 ¼ IR1 gm Ir pi r pi I Lk :
k¼1
dIR1 1
¼ ½IR1 gm Ir pi r pi IL1
dt C 2 R1
1 X
2
þ ½IR1 gm Ir pi r pi ILk
C3 R1 k¼1
1 1
½IR1 ICpi Ir pi ½IR1 ICpi Ir pi þ IL 2
C1 R1 C 4 R1
dIR1 1 1 1
¼ IR1 gm Ir pi r pi IL
dt C2 R1 C2 R1 C2 R1 1
1 1
IR1 gm Ir pi r pi
C3 R1 C3 R1
1 X 2
1 1 1
ILk IR1 þ ICpi þ Ir pi
C3 R1 k¼1 C1 R1 C1 R1 C1 R1
1 1 1 1
IR1 þ ICpi þ Ir pi IL
C4 R1 C4 R1 C4 R1 C4 R1 2
dIR1 1 1 1 1
¼ IR1 IR1 IR1 IR1
dt C2 R1 C1 R1 C3 R1 C4 R1
1 1 1 1
gm Ir pi r pi gm Ir pi r pi þ Ir pi þ Ir pi
C 2 R1 C3 R 1 C1 R 1 C4 R 1
1 1 1 1 1 X
2
þ ICpi þ ICpi IL IL ILk
C1 R1 C4 R1 C2 R1 1 C4 R1 2 C3 R1 k¼1
dIR1 X 4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
¼ ½ IR 1 þ ½ ð Þ gm r pi Ir pi þð Þ ICpi
dt C R1
k¼1 k
C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R1 C R1
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X
3
1 1 X
4
1 1 dIL R1 r pi
½ IL ½ IL ; 1 ¼ IR 1 þ Ir pi
k¼2
Ck R1 1 C R1 2 dt
k¼3 k
L1 L1
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 649
dIr pi 1 1
¼ ½IR1 ICpi Ir pi þ ½IR1 ICpi Ir pi þ I L2
dt C1 r pi C4 r pi
dIr pi X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
¼½ IR1 ½ ICpi ½
dt C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1
Ir pi þ IL
C4 r pi 2
dIL2 dY1 1 X
2
1
¼ Y1 ; ¼ ½IR1 gm Ir pi r pi ILk ½IR1 ICpi Ir pi þ IL2
dt dt C 3 L2 k¼1
C 4 L2
dY1 1 1 1 1
¼ IR1 IR1 gm Ir pi r pi þ Ir pi
dt C3 L2 C4 L2 C3 L2 C4 L2
1 1 1 1
I L1 IL2 I L2 þ ICpi
C3 L2 C3 L2 C4 L2 C4 L2
dY1 X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ ½ IR1 þ ½ gm r pi Ir pi IL
dt C
k¼3 k
L 2 C4 C 3 L2 C3 L2 1
X4
1 1 1
½ I L2 þ ICpi
C
k¼3 k
L2 C 4 L2
dIR1 X4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
¼ ½ IR 1 þ ½ ð Þ gm r pi Ir pi þð Þ ICpi
dt k¼1
C k R1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½ IL1 ½ IL
C R1
k¼2 k
C R1 2
k¼3 k
dIr pi X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
¼½ IR1 ½ ICpi ½
dt C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1
Ir pi þ IL
C4 r pi 2
dY1 X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ ½ IR1 þ ½ gm r pi Ir pi IL
dt C L2
k¼3 k
C4 C3 L2 C3 L2 1
X4
1 1 1
½ I L2 þ ICpi
C L2
k¼3 k
C4 L2
650 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
dIL1 R1 r pi dIL2
¼ IR1 þ Ir pi ; ¼ Y1
dt L1 L1 dt
dY1 X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ 0 ) ½ IR1 þ ½ gm r pi Ir I
dt k¼3
Ck L2 C 4 C3 L 2
pi
C3 L2 L1
X4
1 1 1
½ I L2 þ IC pi ¼ 0
C
k¼3 k
L2 C 4 L2
dIr pi
¼0
dt
X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
)½ IR1 ½ IC pi ½
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1
Ir þ I
pi
C4 r pi L2
¼0
dIR1 X4
1 1 X4
1 X 3
1 1
¼ 0 ) ½ IR1 þ ½ ð Þ gm r pi Ir pi
dt k¼1
Ck R 1 k¼1
Ck k¼2
C k R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X4
1 1 X3
1 1 X 4
1 1
þð Þ IC pi ½ IL1 ½ IL2 ¼ 0
C
k¼1 k
R 1 C
k¼2 k
R1 C
k¼3 k
R1
k6¼2
k6¼3
r pi
Y1 ¼ 0; IR1 R1 þ Ir pi r pi ¼ 0 ) IR1 ¼ Ir pi
R1
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 651
X 4
1 1 1 1 1 1 X 4
1 1
½ IR 1 þ ½ gm r pi Ir pi IL1 ½ IL2
k¼3
Ck L 2 C 4 C3 L2 C3 L2 C
k¼3 k
L2
1
þ I ¼ 0
C4 L2 Cpi
X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1 1
½ IR1 ½ IC pi ½ Ir þ I ¼ 0
k¼1
C k r pi k¼1
Ck r pi k¼1
C k r pi pi
C4 r pi L2
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
X4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½ IR1 þ ½ ð Þ gm r pi Ir pi þð Þ IC pi
k¼1
C k R 1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
Ck R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½ IL1 ½ IL2 ¼ 0
C
k¼2 k
R 1 C
k¼3 k
R 1
X4
1 r pi 1 1 1 1
ðÞf½ þ½ gm r pi g Ir I
C R1 L2
k¼3 k
C4 C3 L2 pi
C3 L2 L1
X4
1 1 1
½ I L2 þ IC pi ¼ 0
k¼3
Ck L2 C4 L2
X4
1 1 1 1 X4
1 1
ðÞ ½ ð þ Þ Ir þ IL2 ½ IC pi ¼ 0
C
k¼1 k
R1 r pi pi
C4 r pi C
k¼1 k
r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X4
1 r pi X4
1 X 3
1 1 X4
1 1
ð Þf½ þ½ ð Þ gm r pig Ir pi þð Þ IC pi
k¼1
C k R1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½ IL1 ½ IL2 ¼ 0
k¼2
C k R 1 k¼3
C k R 1
X4
1 X4
1 C4 r pi
ðÞIL2 ¼ ½ C4 IC pi þ ½ ð þ C4 Þ Ir pi
C
k¼1 k
C
k¼1 k
R1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
652 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
ðÞ ! ðÞ
X 4
1 r pi 1 1 1 1
f½ þ½ gm r pi g Ir I
k¼3
C k R 1 L2 C4 C 3 L2
pi
C3 L2 L1
X4
1 1 X4
1 X4
1 C4 r pi
½ f½ C4 IC pi þ ½ ð þ C4 Þ Ir pi g
C
k¼3 k
L2 C
k¼1 k
C
k¼1 k
R1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
1
þ I ¼ 0
C4 L2 Cpi
X4
1 r pi 1 1 1 X 4
1 1 X 4
1 C4 r pi
f½ þ½ gm r pi ½ ½ ð þ C4 Þ Ir pi g
k¼3
C k R 1 L 2 C 4 C3 L 2 k¼3
Ck L 2 k¼1
C k R1
k6¼2
k6¼3
1 1 X4
1 X4
1 1
I þ f ½ ½ C4 g IC pi ¼ 0
C3 L2 L1 C4 C
k¼3 k
C
k¼1 k
L2
k6¼2
k6¼3
ðÞ ! ð Þ
X4
1 r pi X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
f½ þ½ ð Þ gm r pig Ir pi þð Þ I
C
k¼1 k
R1 C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R1 C R1 Cpi
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X 3
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 X4
1 C4 r pi
½ IL1 ½ f½ C4 IC pi þ ½ ð þ C4 Þ Ir pi g ¼0
k¼2
C k R1 k¼3
Ck R1 k¼1
Ck k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X4
1 r pi X4
1 X3
1 1
ff½ þ½ ð Þ gm r pig
C
k¼1 k
R1 C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X4
1 1 X 4
1 C4 r pi
½ ½ ð þ C4 Þg Ir pi
k¼3
Ck R1 k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X 4
1 X 3
1 1
þ fð Þ ½ ½ C4 g IC pi ½ IL1 ¼ 0
C R1
k¼1 k
C R1 k¼1 Ck
k¼3 k
C R1
k¼2 k
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
Remark: it is reader exercise to get the exact fixed points options in our case.
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of the Colpitt’s oscillator circuit (BJT transistor small signal
model) consists in adding to coordinate ½Y1 ; Ir pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 arbitrarily small
increments of exponentially form ½y1 ; ir pi ; iR1 ; iL1 ; iL2 ekt and retaining the first
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 653
order terms in Y1 ; Ir pi ; IR1 ; IL1 ; IL2 . The system of homogenous equations leads to a
polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalues [4]. The polynomial charac-
teristic equations accept by set of the below circuit variables, circuit variables
derivative and circuit variables second order derivative with respect to time into
Colpitt’s oscillator circuit [2, 3, 4]. Our Colpitt’s oscillator fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½y1 ; ir pi ; iR1 ; iL1 ; iL2 ekt are: j = 0
(first fixed point), j = 1(second fixed point), j = 2(third fixed point), etc.,
&&&
dIR1 X4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
¼½ IR 1 þ ½ ð Þ gm r pi Ir pi þð Þ ICpi
dt k¼1
C k R 1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
Ck R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½ IL 1 ½ IL2
k¼2
C k R 1 k¼3
C k R 1
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
iR1 k ekt ¼ ½ ½IR1 þ iR1 ekt
C R1
k¼1 k
X4
1 X3
1 1 ðjÞ
þ½ ð Þ gm r pi ½Ir pi þ ir pi ekt
k¼1
Ck k¼2
Ck R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X3
1 1 ðjÞ
þð Þ ½ICpi þ iCpi ekt ½ ½IL1 þ iL1 ekt
k¼1
Ck R 1 k¼2
Ck R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
½ ½IL2 þ iL2 ekt
k¼3
Ck R1
654 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
X4
1 1 ðjÞ X 4
1 X3
1 1 ðjÞ
iR1 k ekt ¼ f½ IR 1 þ ½ ð Þ gm r pi Ir pi
k¼1
C k R 1 k¼1
Ck k¼2
Ck R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X4
1 1 ðjÞ X 3
1 1 ðjÞ X 4
1 1 ðjÞ
þð Þ ICpi ½ IL 1 ½ IL 2 g
C
k¼1 k
R 1 C
k¼2 k
R 1 C
k¼3 k
R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X4
1 1 X4
1 X 3
1 1
½ iR1 ekt þ ½ ð Þ gm r pi ir pi ekt
k¼1
C k R 1 k¼1
Ck k¼2
Ck R 1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X4
1 1 X 3
1 1 X 4
1 1
þð Þ iCpi ekt ½ iL1 ekt ½ iL2 ekt
C R1
k¼1 k
C R1
k¼2 k
C R1
k¼3 k
k6¼2
k6¼3
At fixed points:
X 4
1 1 ðjÞ X 4
1 X 3
1 1 ðjÞ X4
1 1 ðjÞ
½ IR1 þ ½ ð Þ gm r pi Ir pi þ ð Þ ICpi
C
k¼1 k
R 1 C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R 1 C
k¼1 k
R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X 3
1 1 ðjÞ X 4
1 1 ðjÞ
½ IL 1 ½ IL 2 ¼ 0
k¼2
Ck R 1 k¼3
C k R 1
X4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
i R1 k ½ i R1 þ ½ ð Þ gm r pi ir pi þð Þ iCpi
k¼1
Ck R 1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½ iL 1 ½ iL2 ¼ 0
k¼2
Ck R 1 k¼3
C k R 1
dIr pi X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
¼½ IR1 ½ ICpi ½
dt k¼1
C k r pi k¼1
Ck r pi k¼1
C k r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1
Ir pi þ IL
C4 r pi 2
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 655
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
ir pi k ekt ¼ ½ ½IR1 þ iR1 ekt ½ ½ICpi þ iCpi ekt
k¼1
Ck r pi k¼1
C k r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½ ½Ir pi þ ir pi ekt þ ½I þ iL2 ekt
C
k¼1 k
r pi C4 r pi L2
k6¼2
k6¼3
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
ir pi k ekt ¼ ½ IR 1 ½ ICpi ½ Ir pi
k¼1
C k r pi k¼1
C k r pi k¼1
C k r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1
þ IL2 þ ½ iR ekt
C4 r pi k¼1
C k r pi 1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X4
1 1 X4
1 1 1
½ iCpi ekt ½ ir pi ekt þ iL ekt
k¼1
C k r pi k¼1
Ck r pi C4 r pi 2
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
At fixed points:
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½ IR1 ½ ICpi ½ Ir pi þ I ¼0
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C4 r pi L2
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
ir pi kþ½ iR1 ½ iCpi ½ ir pi
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
C r pi
k¼1 k
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1
þ iL ¼ 0
C4 r pi 2
dY1 X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
¼ ½ IR1 þ ½ gm r pi Ir pi IL
dt C
k¼3 k
L 2 C4 C 3 L2 C3 L2 1
X4
1 1 1
½ I L2 þ ICpi
C L2
k¼3 k
C4 L2
656 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 1 ðjÞ
y1 k ekt ¼ ½ ½IR1 þ iR1 ekt þ ½ gm r pi ½Ir pi þ ir pi ekt
C L2
k¼3 k
C4 C3 L2
1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1 ðjÞ
½IL1 þ iL1 ekt ½ ½IL2 þ iL2 ekt
C3 L2 k¼3
C k L 2
1 ðjÞ
þ ½I þ iCpi ekt
C4 L2 Cpi
X4
1 1 ðjÞ X4
1 1 1 1 1 ðjÞ
y1 k ekt ¼ ½ IR1 ½ iR1 ekt þ ½ gm r pi Ir pi
k¼3
C k L 2 k¼3
C k L 2 C 4 C 3 L 2
1 1 1 1 ðjÞ 1 X4
1 1 ðjÞ
þ½ gm r pi ir pi ekt I iL ekt ½ I
C4 C3 L2 C3 L2 L1 C3 L2 1 C L2 L2
k¼3 k
X4
1 1 1 ðjÞ 1
½ iL2 ekt þ ICpi þ iCpi ekt
k¼3
C k L 2 C 4 L2 C 4 L2
X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
y1 k ekt ¼ f½ IR 1 þ ½ gm r pi Ir pi IL 1
k¼3
Ck L2 C 4 C3 L2 C3 L2
X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
X4
1 1
½ IL2 þ ICpi g ½ iR1 ekt
k¼3
Ck L2 C4 L2 k¼3
C k L2
1 1 1
þ½ gm r pi ir pi ekt
C4 C3 L2
1 X 4
1 1 1
iL1 ekt ½ iL2 ekt þ iCpi ekt
C3 L2 k¼3
C k L 2 C 4 L 2
At fixed points:
X4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½ IR1 þ ½ gm r pi Ir pi I L1
k¼3
C k L2 C4 C3 L2 C3 L2
X 4
1 1 ðjÞ 1 ðjÞ
½ I L2 þ ICpi ¼ 0
k¼3
C k L 2 C 4 L2
X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
y1 k ½ iR1 þ ½ gm r pi ir pi iL
C
k¼3 k
L2 C 4 C3 L2 C3 L2 1
X4
1 1 1
½ i L2 þ iCpi ¼ 0
C L2
k¼3 k
C4 L2
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 657
dIL1 R1 r pi ðjÞ R1
¼ IR1 þ Ir pi ; iL1 k ekt ¼ ½IR1 þ iR1 ekt
dt L1 L1 L1
ðjÞ r pi ðjÞ R ðjÞ r pi R1
þ ½Ir pi þ ir pi ekt iL1 k ekt ¼ IR1 þ iR1 ekt
1
þ Ir pi
L1 L1 L1 L1
r pi kt
þ ir pi e
L1
At fixed points:
ðjÞ R1 ðjÞ r pi R1 r pi
IR1 þ Ir pi ¼ 0; iL1 k þ iR1 þ ir pi ¼0
L1 L1 L1 L1
dIL2 ðjÞ ðjÞ
dt ¼ Y1 ; iL2 k ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt . At fixed points: Y1 ¼ 0; iL2 k þ y1 ¼ 0
We can summery our Colpitt’s oscillator circuit arbitrarily small increments
equations:
X4
1 1 X4
1 X3
1 1 X4
1 1
i R1 k ½ i R1 þ ½ ð Þ gm r pi ir pi þð Þ iCpi
k¼1
Ck R 1 k¼1
C k k¼2
C k R 1 k¼1
C k R 1
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
X3
1 1 X4
1 1
½ iL 1 ½ iL2 ¼ 0
k¼2
Ck R 1 k¼3
C k R 1
X4
1 1 X4
1 1 X4
1 1
ir pi kþ½ iR1 ½ iCpi ½ ir pi
C
k¼1 k
r pi C
k¼1 k
r pi C
k¼1 k
r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3 k6¼3
1
þ iL ¼ 0
C4 r pi 2
X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
y1 k ½ iR1 þ ½ gm r pi ir pi iL
k¼3
Ck L2 C 4 C3 L2 C3 L2 1
X4
1 1 1
½ iL2 þ iCpi ¼ 0
C
k¼3 k
L2 C 4 L2
R1 r pi
iL1 k þ iR1 þ ir pi ¼ 0; iL2 k þ y1 ¼ 0
L1 L1
658 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
0 1
P
4
½ð 1
B k¼1 Ck R1 C Þ 1
B k6¼2 C
0 1 B
B k6¼3
C
C
0 1 iR B C
B
1
B
C B f½ P 4 C
N11 ... N15 B r pi C B
i 1
Ck C
C
B . .. .. C B C B k¼1 C
B . C B C
. A B y1 C þ B C iCpi ¼ 0;
¼
@ . .
k6 2
C B C
k6¼3
B B C
N51 N55 @ i L1 A B r 1pig C
B C
i L2 B 1 C
B C4 L2 C
B C
@ 0 A
0
0 1
0 1 iR1
N11 ... N15 B C
B ir pi C
B . .. C
.. C B B C
B . C
@ . . . A B y1 C 0
B C
N51 N55 @ i L1 A
i L2
0 1
P
4
B ½ð Ck Þ
R1 C
1 1
B k¼1 C
B k6k6¼¼32 C
B C
B P C
B 4
C
B f½ Ck
1
C P
B C 4
Assumption: B k¼1
C iCpi ! e; N11 ¼ k ½ C1k R11
B k6¼2
k6¼3 C
B C k¼1
B r 1pig C
B C
B 1 C
B C4 L2 C
@ 0 A
0
X4
1 X3
1 1
N12 ¼ ½ ð Þ gm r pi ; N13 ¼ 0;
C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X3
1 1 X4
1 1
N14 ¼ ½ ; N15 ¼ ½
k¼2
Ck R1 k¼3
Ck R 1
X4
1 1 X4
1 1
N21 ¼ ½ ; N22 ¼ k ½ ;
C
k¼1 k
r pi C
k¼1 k
r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
1
N23 ¼ 0; N24 ¼ 0; N25 ¼
C4 r pi
6.4 Colpitts Oscillator Stability Analysis 659
X4
1 1 1 1 1 1
N31 ¼ ½ ; N32 ¼ ½ gm r pi ; N33 ¼ k; N34 ¼
k¼3
Ck L2 C 4 C3 L2 C3 L2
X4
1 1 R1 r pi
N35 ¼ ½ ; N41 ¼ ; N42 ¼ ; N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k; N45 ¼ 0
k¼3
Ck L2 L 1 L1
X4
1 1
n1 ¼ n1 ðC k
; R1 Þ ¼ ½ ; n1 ¼ n2 ðC k
;
C
k¼1 k
R 1
½k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4 ½k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4
X4
1 X 3
1 1
R1 ; r pi; gm Þ ¼ ½ ð Þ gm r pi
C
k¼1 k
C
k¼2 k
R1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X3
1 1 X4
1 1
n3 ¼ n3 ðC2 ; C3 ; R1 Þ ¼ ½ ; n4 ¼ n4 ðC3 ; C4 ; R1 Þ ¼ ½
k¼2
C k R 1 k¼3
Ck R 1
X4
1 1 X4
1 1
n5 ¼ n5 ðC1 ; C4 ; r piÞ ¼ ½ ; n6 ¼ n6 ðC1 ; C4 ; r piÞ ¼ ½
C
k¼1 k
r pi C
k¼1 k
r pi
k6¼2 k6¼2
k6¼3 k6¼3
1 X4
1 1
n7 ¼ n7 ðC4 ; r piÞ ¼ ; n8 ¼ n8 ðC3 ; C4 ; L2 Þ ¼ ½
C4 r pi C L2
k¼3 k
1 1 1 1
n9 ¼ n9 ðC3 ; C4 ; r pi; L2 Þ ¼ ½ gm r pi ; n10 ¼ n10 ðC3 ; L2 Þ ¼
C4 C3 L2 C3 L2
X4
1 1 R1
n11 ¼ n11 ðC3 ; C4 ; L2 Þ ¼ ½ ; n12 ¼ n12 ðR1 ; L1 Þ ¼ ;
k¼3
Ck L 2 L1
r pi
n13 ¼ n13 ðr pi; L1 Þ ¼
L1
660 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
P
5 P
5
detðA k IÞ ¼ !k kk ¼ 0. Next is to find zeros of !k kk ¼ 0 and
k¼0 k¼0
establish stability according to criterion of Liapunov [2, 3, 4].
Exercises 661
Exercises
1. We have resonator circuit hð0\h\1Þ degree phase shift. The output of the
amplifier is taken through a phase shift network to provide it an additional
phase shift of hð0\h\1Þ degree. Amplifier provides a phase shift of 180°
and the phase shift network also gives a θ°. Therefore total phases shift of
(180 + θ) degree (it is a 60° phase shift per RC section). The phase shift
network is constructed from n RC sections (n [ 3; n 2 N).
Phase shift resonant circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small
Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. Consider in your analysis “AC ground” in
the Small Signal (SS) circuit.
1:1 Find resonator circuit differential equations.
1:2 Find resonator circuit fixed points.
1:3 Discuss stability of resonator circuit hð0\h\1Þ degree phase shift by
using Liapunov theory. How the stability is dependent on the number
(n) of RC sections?
1:4 Discuss the circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the
position of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of eigen-
values in the Re/Im plane is changed for different numbers (n) of RC
sections?
1:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit for different number (n) of
RC sections.
662 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
2. We have resonator circuit uð0\u\1Þ degree phase shift. The output of the
amplifier is taken through two phase shift networks in cascade (series). There is
intermediate RF choke (L) between the first and the second RC networks. The
phase shift of the first network is u1 ð0\u1 \1Þ degree and the phase shift of
P2
the second network is u2 ð0\u2 \1Þ degree u¼ uk ; 0\u\1. In the first
k¼1
RC network the number of RC sections is n. In the second RC network the
number of RC sections is m (n 6¼ m; n; m [ 3; n; m 2 N).
Phase shift resonator circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small
Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. Consider in your analysis “AC signal” in
the small signal circuit model.
2:1 Find resonator circuit differential equations.
2:2 Find resonator circuit fixed points.
2:3 Discuss stability of resonator circuit uð0\u\1Þ phase shift by using
Liapunov theory. How the stability is dependent on the number (n) of RC
Exercises 663
sections in the first network? and the number (m) of RC sections in the
second network? How the stability of resonator circuit is dependent on the
value of intermediate RF choke (L)?
2:4 Discuss the circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the
position of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of eigen-
values in the Re/Im plane is changed for different number of RC sections
in the first network (n) and second network (m)?
2:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit for different number of RC
sections in the first network (n) and second network (m).
3. We have parallel resonator crystal oscillator circuit (BJT crystal oscillator). The
BJT’s collector is connected to RFC (Radio Frequency Coil) L1. Additionally
we have XTAL which is connected to circuit’s output. The circuit contains
biasing resistors R1 and R2 and additional elements (CB, RE, C1, C2). Our
circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small Signal
(SS) equivalent model. Consider in your analysis “AC ground” in the Small
Signal (SS) circuit.
v ðtÞ np np v ðtÞ np
vs ¼ ns d/
dt ; vp ðtÞ ¼ vp ; vs ðtÞ ¼ vs ; vs ðtÞ ¼
p
ns ;a ¼ ns . vps ðtÞ ¼ ns for all times t and
n
for all voltages vp and vs . We define the ratio between np and ns as “a” ða ¼ nps Þ.
Step down transformer a > 1 and step up transformer a < 1. By law of con-
servation of energy, apparent real and reactive powers are each conserved in the
input and output ðS ¼ Ip vp ¼ Is vs ; vp ¼ VL1 þ VL2 Þ.
Remark: Coil 1 (primary) is constructed from two coils (L1 and L2 in series).
Hartley oscillator circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small
Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. Consider in your analysis “AC signal” in
the small signal circuit model.
4:1 Find Hartley oscillator circuit differential equations.
4:2 Find Hartley oscillator circuit fixed points.
4:3 Discuss stability of Hartley oscillator circuit by using Liapunov theorem.
How the stability is dependent on the number of turns of the coil 1
(primary) and 2 (secondary) of T1 transformer?
4:4 Discuss the circuit behavior which characterized as a function of the
position of eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. How the position of the
eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane is changed if we short resistor Re? And if
we disconnect capacitor Ce?
4:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit if we multiple the capac-
itance C by factor Γ (C ! C C; C 2 R þ ). How the circuit stability is
dependent on Γ parameter?
5. We have transistor Colpitts oscillator circuit. The circuit is constructed from
sub tank circuit and peripheral components. The sub tank circuit is constructed
from two capacitors C1 and C2, primary transformer (T1)—inductance L
(Lp = L). The secondary transformer (T1) inductance is Ls (Lp ≠ Ls).
Additionally there are L1 (RFC = Radio Frequency Coil), BJT transistor bias
resistors R1 and R2, Q1 transistor emitter resistor (Re) and capacitor (Ce),
feedback capacitor (Cc). Colpitts oscillator circuit stability analysis is done by
considering BJT Small Signal (SS) equivalent circuit model. Consider in your
analysis “AC signal” in the small signal circuit model. Transformer T1: vp—
transformer primary voltage, vs—transformer secondary voltage. ϕ is the flux
through a one turn coil located anywhere on the transformer core. np and ns are
the number of turns of the coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary), respectively, then
the total flux ϕp and ϕs through coils 1 and 2 respectively are /p ¼ np /; /s ¼
d/p d/s vp ðtÞ
ns /; vp ¼ dt ; vs ¼ dt ; vp ¼ np dt vs ¼ ns dt ; vp ðtÞ ¼ vp ; vs ðtÞ ¼ vs ; vs ðtÞ ¼
d/ d/
np n v ðtÞ n
ns ;a ¼ nps . vps ðtÞ ¼ nps for all times t and for all voltages vp and vs . We define the
n
ratio between np and ns as “a” (a ¼ nps ). Step down transformer a > 1 and step
up transformer a < 1. By law of conservation of energy, apparent real and
reactive powers are each conserved in the input and output
(S ¼ Ip vp ¼ Is vs ).
666 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
reduces the feedback signal. Therefore, the gain of the transistor limits the
maximum value of C1 and C2. The output amplitude should be kept low in
order to avoid excessive power dissipation in the crystal.
output into an emitter follower buffer amplifier. The oscillator section of this
circuit is a slightly different version of typical Colpitts oscillator. The RF choke
(L1) is the load impedance for Q1 and the tank circuit is isolated from Q1 by two
DC blocking capacitors, C1 and C4. The Colpitts oscillator circuit uses a tuned
feedback path rather than a tuned amplifier. The emitter follower stage (R4, Q2
and R5) has very high input impedance, thus having little loading effect on the
oscillator, and very low output impedance allowing it to drive loads of only a
few tens of ohms impedance. The frequency stability of oscillators can be
affected by variations in supply voltage.
Our circuit stability analysis is done by considering BJT Small Signal
(SS) equivalent model for Q1 and Q2. Consider in your analysis “AC ground”
in the Small Signal (SS) circuit.
7:5 Discuss center manifold theorem in our circuit if we multiple the capac-
itance C2 by factor Γ (C2 ! C C2 ; C 2 R þ ). How the circuit stability is
dependent on Γ parameter?
8. We have Colpitts double crystals oscillator circuit. The crystals oscillator
(XTAL1 and XTAL2) is designed around a CC (Common Collector),
emitter-follower amplifier. The R1 resistor sets the DC bias level on the base
while emitter resistor Re sets the output voltage level. The type of transistor is
NPN connected in a common collector configuration and is capable of oper-
ating at high switching speeds. Capacitor C1 can be tune in his value.
9. We have voltage controlled RF oscillator (VCO) circuit. The VCO circuit may
be considered as an amplifier and a feedback loop. For the circuit to oscillate
the total phase shift around the loop must be 360° and the gain must be unity.
VCO circuit uses a common emitter circuit. This is itself produces a phase shift
of 180°, leaving the feedback network to provide a further 180°. VCO circuit
which uses a common base circuit where there is no phase shift between the
emitter and collector signals (using bipolar transistor) and the phase shift net-
work must provide either 0° or 360°. The system includes a resonator circuit to
ensure that the oscillation occurs on a given frequency. The resonator circuit
can be an LC resonator circuit in either series or parallel resonance depending
upon the circuit, or a quartz crystal. Resistors Rb1 and Rb2 are Q1’s transistor
biasing elements.
One of the options for VCO active device is bipolar transistor. The bipolar transistor has a
low input impedance and is current driven. To make a VCO, the oscillator needs to be tuned
by a voltage. This is done by variable capacitor from varactor diodes. The tune voltage for
the VCO can then be applied to the varactors. The control line from the phase detector is
isolated from the varactor diodes using a resistor R1. Inductor L1 is the RF choke (RFC).
The series capacitor C3 is used to block the DC from the inductor otherwise it would
provide a direct short to ground and upset the bias arrangements of the circuit. The value of
C3 is normally large in comparison with C1 and C2 and can be ignored from the resonance
perspective. If we use a varactor diodes within a voltage controlled oscillator, care must be
taken in the design of the circuit to ensure that the drive level in the tuned circuit is not too
high. In that case the varactor diodes may be driven into forward conduction, reducing the
Q and increasing the level of spurious signals.
Varactor diodes: In your stability analysis use the simple model of a packaged
varactor diode. A varactor diode is a P-N diode that changes its capacitance and
the series resistance as the bias applied to the diode is varied. The property of
Exercises 671
pffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi3
C2 ! C2 ¼ n2 ðC2 ; XÞ; ðn1 ðC1 ; CÞ ¼ C1 C þ C1 C ; C 2 R þ Þ:
pffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ðn2 ðC2 ; XÞ ¼ C2 X3 þ C2 X ; X 2 R þ Þ. How the circuit stability is
dependent on Γ and Ω parameters?
10. We have Common Base (CB) bipolar colpitts oscillator with varactor diode.
Common Base (CB) amplifier, input signal is inserted at emitter (E) and output
signal taken from the collector (C). The CB amplifier can operate as a voltage
amplifier for low input impedance circuits. The transistor is matched to the
load. One capacitor of the divider circuit is the varactor, whose voltage can be
changed by applying a tuning voltage through RF choke (L3) and a bypass
conductor. Note that the capacitance variation with voltage is nonlinear, with
the capacitance changing more at low values of bias voltage than at high values.
The typical capacitance variation of a varactor diode (D1) is as a function of the
reverse bias voltage. This leads to a nonlinear frequency versus voltage tuning
curve for the oscillator. If linearity is required, a compensation network must be
used to modify the tuning voltage before it is applied to varactor. Resistors
R1… R4 are circuit biasing elements. Output matching network can be Pi or T
type. Varactor diodes: In your stability analysis use the simple model of a
672 6 Microwave/RF Oscillator Systems Stability Analysis
packaged varactor diode. A varactor diode is a P-N diode that changes its
capacitance and the series resistance as the bias applied to the diode is varied.
The target of analog and RF filtering is to modify the magnitude and phase of signal
frequency components. Many analog or radio frequency (RF) circuits perform fil-
tering on the signals passing through them. The analog and RF filters types are
defined on the criteria how they modify the magnitude and/or phase of sinusoidal
frequency components. The primary issue is magnitude response. In other cases
filters concerned with phase modifications. Filters are typically classified based on
how they modify the frequency spectrum. The four basic types of filters are; the low
pass filter, High pass filter, bandpass filter and band stop filter. Microwave and RF
filters pass a range of frequencies and reject other frequencies. Filters are widely
used at the input of a microwave receiver. The RF and microwave system’s fre-
quencies are picked up by the receiving antenna system and enter the radio receiver.
The first target of the filter is to pass only those frequencies in the assigned oper-
ation range. The second target of the filter is to reject all other frequencies.
Important graphs when analyzing the functionality of filter is the attenuation of a
microwave signal passing through the filter as a function of frequency. Good filters
have a large out of band attenuation and a low in band insertion loss. The selectivity
feature defines the frequency range over which the filter characteristics change from
passing the signal to blocking it. A Diplexer is a three port network that splits the
incoming signal on one end and directs it through two outputs to different lines,
dependent on frequency. A diplexer is the simplest form of a multiplexer, which can
split the signals from one common port into many different paths. Quartz crystals
are widely used In many filters applications. Quartz crystals have piezo electric
properties; they develop an electric potential upon the application of mechanical
stress. One of the most common piezoelectric uses of quartz is as a crystal oscil-
lator. The resonant frequency of a quartz crystal oscillator is changed by
mechanically loading it. A quartz crystal has two resonant frequencies, a series
resonant frequency and a parallel resonant frequency. A quartz crystal operating on
its parallel resonant frequency behaves like a parallel LC circuit. It has high
impedance at one frequency and other frequency only. The practical advantage of
quartz crystal is that it has an extremely high Q and result of an excellent high
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017 673
O. Aluf, Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45427-6_7
674 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
selectivity filter. The crystal lattice filter can be a band pass filter, suitable for use as
a sideband filter in an SSB transmitter receiver or transmitter. The two resonant
frequencies of a quartz crystal are important when designing many RF systems.
A tunable third order bandpass filter using varactors is commonly used in many RF
applications. A tunable filter has greater functionality, better channel selectivity,
reduced size, and lower weight since the same hardware can be employed at
multiple bands. Practically tunable frequency filters are used as tracking filters for
multi band telecommunication systems, wideband radar systems and radiometers.
Tracking filters are mechanically tuned by adjusting the cavity dimensions of the
resonators or magnetically altering the resonant frequency. The tuning element is a
reverse-biased varactor diode [26, 33, 34, 42].
The terminology duplexers and diplexers are very important for wireless commu-
nication. Duplexer is when two band pass filters are duplexed, meaning one
common input, and two outputs (reverse is also correct, two inputs and one output).
Duplexer will duplex a receiving and transmitting signal using two band pass filter,
one common input (or output), and two outputs (or inputs), and is a three port
device. A diplexer will refer to a duplexed high pass and low pass where broad
bands transmit and receive is necessary, it is also a three port device with a common
input and two outputs. A diplexer is a passive device that implements frequency
domain multiplexing. Two ports (e.g., L and H) are multiplexed onto a third port
(e.g., S). The signals on ports L and H occupy disjoint frequency bands.
Consequently, the signals on L and H can coexist on port S without interfering with
each other. The signal on port L will occupy a single low frequency band and the
signal on port H will occupy a higher frequency band. In that situation, the diplexer
consists of a low pass filter connecting ports L and S and high pass filter connecting
ports H and S. Ideally, all the signal power on port L is transferred to the S port and
vice versa. None of the low band signal is transferred from S port to the H port.
Some power will be lost, and some signal power will leak to the wrong port. The
diplexer, being a passive device, is reciprocal; the device itself doesn’t have a
notion of input or output. The diplexer is a different device than a passive combiner
or splitter. The ports of a diplexer are frequency selective; the ports of a combiner
are not. This is also a power “loss” difference—a combiner takes all the power
delivered to the S port and divides it between the A and B ports. A diplexer
multiplexes two ports onto one port, but more than two ports may be multiplexed: a
three port to one port multiplexer is known as a triplexer. Our BPF diplexer without
a series input circuits splits transmit from receive frequency in an FDD (Frequency
Division Duplex) transceiver. A diplexer can be placed at the output of a frequency
RF source, where it functions as an absorptive filter [91, 92].
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 675
Fig. 7.1 BPF diplexer without a series input block diagram with RF source, output matching
network and Rload
Filter 1 of the duplexer has a BPF that corresponds with the undesired frequency
band, which can pass right through with little attenuation, and is terminated within
the 50 X load. These undesired frequencies are blocked from entering filter 2 by
that filter’s stop band. Filter 2 BPF passes all the desired signals onto the load
through matching network with little attenuation. The undesired signals through the
diplexer are absorbed instead of being reflected as they would be in a typical filter.
This absorption will prevent any undesired frequency products that were created by
the RF source nonlinearity, from being bounced off of a reflective filters stopbands,
which would return to the RF source and cause increased Inter Modulation
Distortion (IMD) levels. The design of a diplexer is as two different frequency
filters with non-overlapping band pass. The full BPF diplexer without a series input
circuit is presented in the next figure. The matching network between diplexer unit
and load can be L-type, Pi-type, and T-type.
In actual microwave and RF system the diplexer unit is connected through micro
strips lines to RF source, 50 X resistor, and load through matching network. We
represent these micro strips parasitic effects as a delay lines in time. The delays are
related to the current which flows through micro strips and are sin, sout1, and sout2
respectively. We choose T-type matching network. Maximum power transfer is
achieved by using T matching network (passive) connected between diplexer unit
and load Rload. The circuit matching network no only designed to meet the
requirement of minimum power loss but to additional targets. The additional targets
of matching network are minimizing noise influence, maximizing power handling
capabilities, and linearizing the frequency response [107, 108].
Fig. 7.3 BPF diplexer without a series input full schematic with delay line elements
Vsin ¼ VA1 VA2 ; Vsout1 ¼ VA4 VA5 ; Vsout2 ¼ VA6 VA7 ; Vsin ! e; Vsout1 ! e; Vsout2
!e
IR1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 ðt sout2 Þ þ IC1 ðt sout2 Þ; ILn1 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 ðt sout1 Þ; IRs ðt sin Þ
¼ IC2 ðtÞ þ IL1 ðtÞ þ IC1 ðtÞ
Vs ðtÞ VA1
Ln1 ¼ ILn2 þ ICn ; IRs ¼ ) VA1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs ;
Rs
Z
dðVA2 VA3 Þ 1
I C2 ¼ C 2 ) VA2 VA3 ¼ IC2 dt
dt C2
dIL2 dIL1
VA3 VA4 ¼ L2 ; VA2 VA6 ¼ L1 ;
dt dt Z
dðVA2 VA6 Þ 1
I C1 ¼ C 1 ) VA2 VA6 ¼ IC1 dt
dt C1
VA dIL dIL
IR1 ¼ 7 ) VA7 ¼ IR1 R1 ; VA5 VA8 ¼ Ln1 n1 ; VA8 VA9 ¼ Ln2 n2
R1 dt dt
Z
dVA8 1 VA9
ICn ¼ Cn ) VA8 ¼ ICn dt; IRload ¼ ) VA9 ¼ IRload Rload
dt Cn Rload
dIL2
VA1 VA2 ; VA4 VA5 ; VA6 VA7 ; VA2 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs ; VA3 VA5 ¼ L2
dt
Z Z
dIL1 1 1
VA2 VA7 ¼ L1 ; VA2 VA7 ¼ IC1 dt; VA3 ¼ VA2 IC2 dt
dt C1 C2
Z
1 dIL
VA3 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs IC2 dt; VA3 VA5 ¼ L2 2 ) VA5
C2 dt
dIL2
¼ VA3 L2
dt
Z
1 dIL dIL
VA5 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs IC2 dt L2 2 ; VA7 ¼ VA2 L1 1
C2 dt dt
Z
dIL 1
VA7 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs L1 1 ; VA7 ¼ VA2 IC1 dt; VA7
Zdt C1
1
¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs IC1 dt
C1
&&&
Z
1
IR1 R1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs IC1 dt; IR1 R1
C1 Z
dIL 1 dIL
¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs L1 1 ; IC1 dt ¼ L1 1
dt C1 dt
678 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
dILn1 dIL
VA5 VA8 ¼ Ln1 ) VA8 ¼ VA5 Ln1 n1 ; VA8
dt Z dt
1 dIL dIL
¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs IC2 dt L2 2 Ln1 n1
C2 dt dt
Z Z
1 1 dIL dIL 1
I Cn dt ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs IC2 dt L2 2 Ln1 n1 ;
Cn Z C2 dt dt Cn
IR1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 ðt sout2 Þ þ IC1 ðt sout2 Þ; ILn1 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 ðt sout1 Þ; IRs ðt sin Þ
¼ IC2 ðtÞ þ IL1 ðtÞ þ IC1 ðtÞ
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 679
dIL1
IR1 R1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs L1 ; ½IL1 ðt sout2 Þ þ IC1 ðt sout2 Þ R1
dt
dIL1
¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs L1
dt
d dVs ðtÞ dIRs 1 1
½IL1 ðt sout2 Þ þ IC1 ðt sout2 Þ R1 ¼ Rs I C1 ; I C1
dt dt dt C1 C1
d 2 IL
¼ L1 2 1
dt
1 dIL d 2 ILn2
ICn n2 Rload ¼ Ln2 ; IRs ðt sin Þ ¼ IL2 ðtÞ þ IL1 ðtÞ þ IC1 ðtÞ
Cn dt dt2
dI dI dI
We define new system variables: dtL1 ¼ X1 ; dtL2 ¼ X2 ; dtLn2 ¼ X3
We can summery our system differential equations (Version 4):
IRs ðt sin Þ ¼ IC2 ðtÞ þ IL1 ðtÞ þ IC1 ðtÞ; ILn1 ¼ ILn2 þ ICn
Remark 1.0 IL1 ðt sout2 Þ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ekt eksout2 ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ekt
dIL1 dIL1 ðtÞ dIL2 dIL2 ðtÞ dX2 d 2 IL2 d 2 IL2 ðtÞ dIC1 dIC1 ðtÞ
¼ ; ¼ ; ¼ 2 ¼ ; ¼
dt dt dt dt dt dt dt2 dt dt
&&& dX3
dt ¼ Cn L
1
n2
ICn X3 RLload
n2
dIRs ðt sin Þ dIL2 ðtÞ dIL1 ðtÞ dIC1 ðtÞ dIRs ðtÞ X2
dIC1 ksin
¼ þ þ ; ¼½ Xk eksin þ e
dt dt dt dt dt k¼1
dt
P
dX2 1 dVs ðtÞ ½ 2k¼1 Xk eksin dIC1 Rs eksin
¼ R s
dt ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 dt ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 dt ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1 1
IL ICn
C2 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 2 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
dIRs X 2
1 dVs ðtÞ X2 Rs ksin 1
¼½ Xk eksin þ ½ X1 e IC1 eksin
dt k¼1
n 1 dt n 1 C 1 n 1
dVs ðtÞ
X1 ¼ 0; X2 ¼ 0; X3 ¼ 0; IC 1 ¼ 0; IC 1 ¼ C1 ! e; IC n ¼ 0; IL2
dt
dVs ðtÞ
¼ C2 !e
dt
ILn1 ¼ ILn2 þ ICn ) ICn ¼ ILn1 ILn2 ; ICn ¼ IL2 ðt sout1 Þ ILn2
We can summery our system differential equations (Version 7):
dIRs X 2
1 dVs ðtÞ X2 Rs ksin 1
¼½ Xk eksin þ ½ X1 e IC1 eksin
dt k¼1
n 1 dt n 1 C 1 n1
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of BPF diplexer circuit consists in adding to its coordinated
[X1 X2 X3 IL1 IL2 ILn2 IC1 IRS ] arbitrarily small increments of exponential terms
½x1 x2 x3 iL1 iL2 iLn2 iC1 iRS ekt , and retaining the first order terms in
x1 x2 x3 iL1 iL2 iLn2 iC1 iRS .
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 683
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X1 ðtÞ ¼ X1 þ x1 ekt ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x2 ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X3 ðtÞ ¼ X3 þ x3 ekt ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
IL2 ðtÞ ¼ IL2 þ iL2 ekt ; ILn2 ðtÞ ¼ ILn2 þ iLn2 ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IC1 þ iC1 ekt ; IRs ¼ IRs þ iRs ekt
ðiÞ dIL1
IL2 ðt sout1 Þ ¼ IL2 þ iL2 ekðtsout1 Þ ; ¼ iL1 k ekt ;
dt
dIL2 dILn2
¼ iL2 k ekt ; ¼ iLn2 k ekt
dt dt
dX1 dX2 dX3 dIC1
¼ x1 k ekt ; ¼ x2 k ekt ; ¼ x3 k ekt ; ¼ iC1 k ekt ; 8 i
dt dt dt dt
¼ 0; 1; 2; . . .
For k < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 unstable.
Our BPF diplexer circuit tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for k < 0,
t > 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the
eigenvalue parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or unstable,
additionally his absolute value |k| establish the speed of flow toward or away from
the selected fixed point [4].
ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ ½X þ x2 ekt Rs ksin 1
iC1 k ekt ¼ ½X1 þ x1 ekt 2 e
n1 dt n1 C1 n1
ðiÞ
½IC1 þ iC1 ekt
ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ X Rs ksin 1 ðiÞ
iC1 k ekt ¼ X1 2 e I
n1 dt n1 C1 n1 C1
x2 ekt Rs ksin 1
x1 ekt e iC1 ekt
n1 C 1 n1
ðiÞ
ðiÞ X2 Rs ðiÞ
At fixed point: 1
n1 dVdts ðtÞ X1 n1 eksin C11n1 IC1 ¼ 0
Rs ksin 1
iC1 k x1 x2 e i C1 ¼ 0
n1 C 1 n1
dX3 1 Rload
¼ ½IL2 ðt sout1 Þ ILn2 ðtÞ X3 ; lim IL ðt sout1 Þ ¼ ILn2 ðtÞ; t
dt Cn Ln2 Ln2 t!1 2
sout1
Rload 1 1
x3 k x3 þ iL eksout1 iL ¼ 0
Ln2 Cn Ln2 2 Cn Ln2 n2
P
dX2 1 dVs ðtÞ ½ 2k¼1 Xk eksin
¼ Rs
dt ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 dt ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1 dVs ðtÞ X2 Rs ksin 1 Rs eksin
½ X1 e IC1
n1 dt n1 C1 n1 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1 1
IL ½IL2 ðt sout1 Þ ILn2
C2 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 2 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 685
P2 ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ½ ðXk þ xk ekt Þ eksin
x2 k ekt ¼ k¼1
Rs
½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 dt ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ ½X þ x2 ekt Rs ksin
f ½X1 þ x1 ekt 2 e
n1 dt n1
1 ðiÞ Rs eksin
½IC1 þ iC1 ekt g
C 1 n1 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1 ðiÞ
½I þ iL2 ekt
C2 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 L2
1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
½I þ iL2 ekðtsout1 Þ ILn2 iLn2 ekt
Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 L2
P ðiÞ
kt 1 dVs ðtÞ ½ 2k¼1 Xk eksin
x2 k e ¼ Rs
½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 dt ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ X Rs ksin 1 ðiÞ Rs eksin
f X1 2 e IC1 g
n1 dt n1 C1 n 1 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
I ½I ILn2
C2 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 L2 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 L2
P
½ 2k¼1 xk eksin ekt x2 ekt Rs ksin
ks
Rs fx1 ekt e
½L2 þ Ln1 e out1 n1
1 Rs eksin
iC1 ekt g
C 1 n1 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1
iL ekt
C2 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 2
1
½iL2 eksout1 iLn2 ekt
Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
At fixed point:
P ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ½ 2k¼1 Xk eksin
Rs
½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 dt ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
ðiÞ
1 dVs ðtÞ ðiÞ X Rs ksin 1 ðiÞ Rs eksin
f X1 2 e I C1 g
n1 dt n1 C1 n1 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ ðiÞ
ks
I L2 ½I ILn2 ¼ 0
C2 ½L2 þ Ln1 e out1 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 L2
686 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
P
½ 2k¼1 xk eksin x2 Rs ksin
x2 k Rs fx1 e
½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 n1
1 Rs eksin
iC1 g
C1 n1 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1
iL
C2 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1 2
1
½iL2 eksout1 iLn2 ¼ 0
Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
Remark: The last differential equation dIdtRs ¼ . . . is not essential for our circuit
stability analysis.
We can summery our BPF diplexer arbitrarily small increments equations.
0 1
iL1
B i C
B L C
0 1 B 2C
N11 ... N17 B iLn2 C
B C
B .. .. .. C B C
@ . . . A B i C C ¼ 0 ; N11 ¼ k ; N12 ¼ N13 ¼ N14 ¼ 0 ; N15
B 1C
N71 N77 B x1 C
B C
B C
@ x2 A
x3
¼ 1 ; N16 ¼ N17 ¼ 0
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 687
N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ k; N23 ¼ N24 ¼ N25 ¼ 0; N26 ¼ 1; N27 ¼ 0; N31 ¼ N32
¼ 0; N33 ¼ k
1 1 ksout1 1
N61 ¼ 0; N62 ¼ ð þ e Þ ; N63
C2 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1
¼
Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1 Rs eksin
N64 ¼ ; N65 ¼ 0; N66
C1 n1 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
ksin ksin
ðn e
Rs
1Þ e
¼ k þ 1 Rs ; N67 ¼ 0
½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1 1
N71 ¼ 0; N72 ¼ eksout1 ; N73 ¼ ; N74 ¼ N75 ¼ N76 ¼ 0; N77
Cn Ln2 Cn Ln2
Rload
¼ k
Ln2
ðC12 þ 1
Cn eksout1 Þ
w1 ¼ w1 ðC2 ; Cn ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ; kÞ ¼
½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1
w2 ¼ w2 ðCn ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ; kÞ ¼
Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1 Rs eksin
w3 ¼ w3 ðC1 ; R1 ; Rs ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 ; kÞ ¼
C1 n1 ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
1 Rs eksin
¼
C1 ½eksout2 R1 þ Rs eksin ½L2 þ Ln1 eksout1
688 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
1 1 1
P2 ðkÞ ¼ k3 þ k2 ðw4 Þ
Cn Ln2 Cn Ln2 C1 n1
1 w 1 Rs
þk ð 4 eksin w3 Þ
Cn Ln2 C1 n1 L1 C1 n1
1 1
þ w4
Cn Ln2 L1 C1
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 689
Table 7.1 BPF diplexer circuit cases for sin, sout1, sout2
Case no. sin sout1 sout2
1 0 0 0
2 s 0 0
3 0 s 0
4 0 0 s
5 s s 0
6 0 s s
7 s 0 s
8 s s s
Rload 1
P3 ðkÞ ¼ w1 k3 þ k2 w1 ð þ Þ þ k w1
Ln2 C1 n1
Rload 1 w1 Rload
ð þ Þþ
C1 n1 Ln2 L1 C1 L1 C1 Ln2
1 1
P4 ðkÞ ¼ k2 ½ w þ w2 eksout1
Cn Ln2 1 Cn Ln2
1 1
þk ½w1 þ w2 eksout1
C1 n1 Cn Ln2
1 1
þ ½w1 þ w2 eksout1
L1 C1 Cn Ln2
detðA k IÞ ¼ k3 P1 ðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ þ k2 P2 ðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ
þ k2 P3 ðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ þ k P4 ðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ
1
w2 ¼ w2 ðCn ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼
Cn ½L2 þ Ln1
ðRn1s 1Þ
w4 ¼ w4 ðRs ; R1 ; L2 ; Ln1 ; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0; kÞ ¼ Rs
½L2 þ Ln1
ð½R1 Rþs Rs 1Þ
¼ Rs
½L2 þ Ln1
1 1
P2 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k3 þ k2
Cn Ln2 Cn Ln2
1
ðw4 ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ Þ
C1 n1 ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
1 w ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ 1
þk ð 4
Cn Ln2 C1 n1 ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ L1 C1
Rs
w ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0ÞÞ
n1 ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ 3
1 1
þ w ð; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Cn Ln2 4 L1 C1
Rload
P1 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k4 þ k3 ½ w4 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Ln2
1 1
þ þ k2 ½
C1 n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ C1 n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Rload
ð w4 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0ÞÞ w4 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Ln2
Rload 1 Rs
þ þ
Ln2 L1 C1 n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
esin k w3 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ þ k
Rload
½ð w4 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0ÞÞ
Ln2
1 w ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ Rload
4
L1 C1 C1 n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ Ln2
Rload Rs
þ
n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ Ln2
eksin w3 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ w4 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Rload
Ln2 L1 C1
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 691
1
P4 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k2 ½ w ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Cn Ln2 1
1
þ w2 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
Cn Ln2
1 1
þk
C1 n1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ Cn Ln2
½w1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
1 1
þ w2 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ þ
L1 C1 Cn Ln2
½w1 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
þ w2 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ
ðC12 þ Cn Þ
1
1
w1 ðsout1 ¼ 0Þ ¼ ; w2 ðsout1 ¼ 0Þ ¼ ; n ðsout2 ¼ 0; sin
½L2 þ Ln1 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 1
¼ 0Þ ¼ R1 þ Rs
1 Rs
w3 ðsin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ ; w ðsout1 ¼ 0; sout2
C1 ½R1 þ Rs ½L2 þ Ln1 4
ð½R1 Rþs Rs 1Þ
¼ 0Þ ¼ Rs
½L2 þ Ln1
&&&
692 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
ð Rs
1Þ
Rload ð½R1 Rþs Rs 1Þ 1 ð ½R½L12þþRsL n1 Rs Þ Rload
A1 ¼ ð ð Rs ÞÞ
Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 L1 C1 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ Ln2
Rload Rs 1 Rs
þ ð Þ
ðR1 þ Rs Þ Ln2 C1 ½R1 þ Rs ½L2 þ Ln1
X
4
P1 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ kk Ak
k¼0
¼ k4 jA4 ¼1 þ k3 A3 þ k2 A2 þ k A1 þ A0
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 693
1 1
P2 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k3 þ k 2
Cn Ln2 Cn Ln2
ð½R1 Rþs Rs 1Þ 1 1
ð Rs Þþk
½L2 þ Ln1 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ Cn Ln2
ð½RRs
1Þ
1 þ Rs
½L2 þ Ln1 Rs 1 Rs 1 Rs
ð Þ
C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ L1 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ C1 ½R1 þ Rs ½L2 þ Ln1
1 ð½R1 Rþs Rs 1Þ 1
þ Rs
Cn Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 L1 C1
1 1 ð½R Rþs R 1Þ 1
B3 ¼ ; B2 ¼ ð 1 s Rs Þ
Cn Ln2 Cn Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ
ð½RRs
1Þ
½L þ L Rs
1 þ Rs
1 1 Rs 1 Rs
B1 ¼ ð 2 n1 Þ
Cn Ln2 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ L1 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ C1 ½R1 þ Rs ½L2 þ Ln1
1 ð½R Rþs R 1Þ 1
B0 ¼ 1 s Rs
Cn Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 L1 C1
X
3
P2 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ kk Bk ¼ k3 B3 þ k2 B2 þ k B1 þ B0
k¼0
ðC12 þ Cn Þ
1
ðC12 þ Cn Þ
1
P3 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k 3 k2
½L2 þ Ln1 ½L2 þ Ln1
Rload 1 ð 1
þ 1
Þ Rload 1
ð þ Þ k C 2 Cn ð þ Þ
Ln2 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ ½L2 þ Ln1 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ Ln2 L1 C1
ðC1 þ C1n Þ
2
½L2 þ Ln1 Rload
L1 C1 Ln2
ðC12 þ Cn Þ
1
ðC12 þ Cn Þ
1
Rload 1
C3 ¼ ; C2 ¼ ð þ Þ
½L2 þ Ln1 ½L2 þ Ln1 Ln2 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ
ð1 þ 1
Þ
ðC12 þ Cn Þ ½L þ L Rload
1 C2 Cn
Rload 1
C1 ¼ ð þ Þ; C0 ¼ 2 n1
½L2 þ Ln1 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ Ln2 L1 C1 L1 C1 Ln2
694 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
X
3
P3 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ kk Ck ¼ k3 C3 þ k2 C2 þ k C1 þ C0
k¼0
1 ð1 þ 1Þ
P4 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ k2 ½ ð C2 Cn Þ
Cn Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1
1 1 1 1 ð1 þ 1Þ
þ þk ½ C2 Cn
Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 Cn Ln2 C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ Cn Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1
1 1 1 ð þ Þ
1 1
1
þ þ ½ C2 Cn þ
Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 L1 C1 Cn Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1
1 ð1 þ 1Þ 1 1
D2 ¼ ð C 2 Cn Þ þ
Cn Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1 Cn Ln2
1 1 ð1 þ 1Þ 1
D1 ¼ ½ C2 Cn þ
C1 ðR1 þ Rs Þ Cn Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1
1 1 ð1 þ 1Þ 1
D0 ¼ ½ C2 Cn þ
L1 C1 Cn Ln2 ½L2 þ Ln1 Cn ½L2 þ Ln1
X
2
P4 ðk; sin ¼ 0; sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ 0Þ ¼ kk Dk ¼ k2 D2 þ k D1 þ D0
k¼0
X
4 X
3 X
3
detðA k IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼ k3 kk Ak þ k2 kk B k þ k2 kk
k¼0 k¼0 k¼0
X
2
Ck þ k k Dk
k
k¼0
X
4 X
3 X
3
detðA k IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼ kk þ 3 Ak þ kk þ 2 Bk þ kk þ 2
k¼0 k¼0 k¼0
X
2
Ck þ kk þ 1 Dk
k¼0
X
3 X
2 X
3 X
2
kk þ 2 Ck ¼ k5 C3 þ kk þ 2 C k ; kk þ 2 Bk ¼ k5 B3 þ kk þ 2 Bk
k¼0 k¼0 k¼0 k¼0
X
4 X
2
kk þ 3 Ak ¼ k7 A4 þ k6 A3 þ kk þ 3 A k
k¼0 k¼0
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 695
X
2
detðA k IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼ k7 A4 k6 A3 kk þ 3 Ak þ k5 B3
k¼0
X
2 X
2 X
2
þ kk þ 2 Bk þ k5 C3 þ kk þ 2 Ck þ kk þ 1 D k
k¼0 k¼0 k¼0
X
2
detðA k IÞjsin ¼0;sout1 ¼0;sout2 ¼0 ¼ k7 A4 k6 A3 kk þ 3 Ak þ k5 B3
k¼0
X
2 X
2 X
2
þ kk þ 2 Bk þ k5 C3 þ kk þ 2 Ck þ kk þ 1 D k
k¼0 k¼0 k¼0
X
2
kk þ 3 Ak ¼ k5 A2 þ k4 A1 þ k3 A0 ;
k¼0
X
2
kk þ 2 Bk ¼ k4 B2 þ k3 B1 þ k2 B0
k¼0
X
2
kk þ 2 Ck ¼ k4 C2 þ k3 C1 þ k2 C0 ;
k¼0
X
2
kk þ 1 D k ¼ k3 D 2 þ k2 D 1 þ k D 0
k¼0
X
7 X
7
detðA k IÞ ¼ k kk ; detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 ) k kk ¼ 0
k¼0 k¼0
!7 ¼ 1; !6 ¼ A3 ; !5 ¼ B3 A2 þ C3 ; !4 ¼ B2 A1 þ C2 ; !3
¼ B1 A0 þ C1 þ D2
696 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
!2 ¼ B0 þ C0 þ D1 ; !1 ¼ D0 ; !0 ¼ 0
Dðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ ¼ detðA k IÞ; Dðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ ¼ 0; Dðk; sÞ
¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ eks
X
n X
m
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ kk ; Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ; n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m
k¼0 k¼0
Pn ðk ¼ 0; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ 0; sÞ ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ q0 ðsÞ 6¼ 0 8 s 2 R þ 0
7.1 BPF Diplexer Without a Series Input Stability Analysis 697
Pn ðk; sÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s for which we
assume:
(I) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R then Pn ði x; sÞ þ Qm ði x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R.
(II) lim supfjQm ðk; sÞ=Pn ðk; sÞj : jkj ! 1; Rek
0g\1 for any s.
(III) Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPn ði x; sÞj2 jQm ði x; sÞj2 for each s has at most a finite
number of real zeros.
(IV) Each positive root xðsÞ of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable in s
whenever it exists.
A diplexer filters to pass two bands to separate ports, and its stability analysis under
parameters variation. In our RF and microwave system, two desired frequencies are
relative close together; design each separate filter to have its own band edge as far
as possible from the other filter. The desired frequency we want to pass is located at
the upper band edge of BPF1, while the desired frequency of BPF2 is at its lower
band edge.
The circuit of dual band diplexer filter contains capacitors and inductors, RF
source Vs(t) and series resistor Rs, two matching networks, and resistive loads
Rload1, Rload2. Three delay lines sin ; sout1 ; sout2 represent circuit micro strip lines
parasitic effects. In our stability analysis we consider fully match between Rload1
and BPF1 and between Rload2 and BPF2 (no matching networks) [25, 26].
Fig. 7.5 Dual band diplexer filter full schematic with delay lines
Vsin ! e; Vsout1 ! e; Vsout2 ! e; Vsin ¼ VA1 VA2 ; Vsout1 ¼ VA6 VA7 ; Vsout2
¼ VA11 VA12
X
6
IRs ðt sin Þ ¼ IL5 þ IL6 ¼ ILk ; IL5 ¼ IC1 ; IL6 ¼ IC6 ; IL1 ¼ IC3 ; IL3 ¼ IC4 ; IRload1 ¼ IC3 ðt sout1 Þ
k¼5
IRload1 ¼ IL1 ðt sout1 Þ; IRload2 ¼ IC4 ðt sout2 Þ; IRload2 ¼ IL3 ðt sout2 Þ
7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 699
P
6
KCL @ node A2: IRs ðt sin Þ ¼ IL5 þ IL6 ¼ ILk , KCL @ node A4:
k¼5
P
2
IC1 ¼ IL2 þ IC2 þ IL1 ¼ IC2 þ I Lk
k¼1
P
4
KCL @ node A9: IC6 ¼ IL4 þ IC5 þ IL3 ¼ IC5 þ I Lk
k¼3
&&&
VA12 VA11
IRload2 ¼ ; VA11 VA12 ; IRload2 ¼ ) VA11 ¼ IRload2 Rload2
Rload2 Rload2
Z Z
1 dIL5 1
VA3 VA4 ¼ IC dt ) Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs L5 IC2 dt
C1 Z 1 dt C2
1
¼ IC1 dt
C1
Z Z
d dIL5 1 1
fVs ðtÞ IRs Rs L5 IC2 dt ¼ IC1 dtg
dt dt C2 C1
VA6
Vsout1 ! e; VA6 ! VA7 ; IRload1 ¼ ) VA6 ¼ IRload1 Rload1
Rload1
Z Z
1 dIL 1
IC2 dt L1 1 IC3 dt ¼ IRload1 Rload1 ;
C2 dt C3
1 d 2 IL 1 dIRload1
I C 2 L1 2 1 I C3 ¼ Rload1
C2 dt C3 dt
dIRload2 d 2 IL d 2 IL 1 1 d 2 IL
Rload2 ¼ L4 2 4 L3 2 3 I C4 ; IC5 ¼ L4 2 4
dt dt dt C4 C5 dt
I C1 ! I L 5 ; I C6 ! I L 6 ; I L 1 ! I C3 ; I L 3 ! I C4
Remark 1.0 IRs ðt sin Þ ¼ IL5 þ IL6 ; IRload2 ¼ IC4 ðt sout2 Þ; IRload1 ¼ IC3 ðt sout1 Þ
dIRs ðt sin Þ
IRs ðt sin Þ ¼ IRs þ iRs ekt eksin ; IRs ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs ekt ;
dt
¼ iRs k ekt eksin
dIRs ðtÞ dIRs ðt sin Þ dIRs ðtÞ ksin dIRs ðtÞ ksin dIL5 dIL6
¼ iRs k ekt ; ¼ e ; e ¼ þ
dt dt dt dt dt dt
dIRs ðtÞ dIL5 ksin dIL6 ksin dIRload2 dIC4 ðt sout2 Þ dIC4 ðtÞ ksout2
¼ e þ e ; ¼ ¼ e
dt dt dt dt dt dt
dX5 dX6 1
X6 eksout2 Rload2 ¼ L4 L3 I C4
dt dt C4
1 dX6 1
X6 eksout2 Rload2 ¼ L4 I C 5 L3 I C4
C5 L4 dt C4
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of dual band diplexer filter circuit consists in adding to its
coordinated [X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 IL5 IC3 IL6 IL4 IC4 IC2 IC5 ] arbitrarily small increments
of exponential terms ½x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 iL5 iC3 iL6 iL4 iC4 iC2 iC5 ekt , and retaining the
first order terms in x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 iL5 iC3 iL6 iL4 iC4 iC2 iC5 . The system of ten ho-
mogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigen-
valuek. The polynomial characteristic equation accepts by set the dual band
diplexer filter circuit equations. The dual band diplexer filter circuit fixed values
with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 iL5 iC3 iL6
iL4 iC4 iC2 iC5 ekt are; i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2
(third fixed point), etc., [2–4].
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x2 ekt ; X3 ðtÞ ¼ X3 þ x3 ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X4 ðtÞ ¼ X4 þ x4 ekt ; X5 ðtÞ ¼ X5 þ x5 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X6 ðtÞ ¼ X6 þ x6 ekt ; IL5 ðtÞ ¼ IL5 þ iL5 ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
IC3 ðtÞ ¼ IC3 þ iC3 ekt ; IL6 ðtÞ ¼ IL6 þ iL6 ekt
Rs 1 1
x2 k ekt ¼ ½x2 ekt þ x4 ekt eksin iC2 ekt iL ekt
L5 C2 L5 C1 L5 5
Rs Rs 1 1
x2 k x2 eksin x4 eksin i C2 iL ¼ 0
L5 L5 C2 L5 C1 L5 5
706 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
dX3 1 1 Rload1
¼ I C2 IC3 X3 eksout1
dt C2 L1 C3 L1 L1
1 1 Rload1
x3 k ekt ¼ iC2 ekt iC3 ekt x3 ekt eksout1
C2 L1 C3 L1 L1
1 1 Rload1
x3 k þ iC2 iC3 x3 eksout1 ¼0
C2 L1 C3 L1 L1
dX5 1 1 ðiÞ
¼ IC5 ) x5 k ekt ¼ ½I þ iC5 ekt ; x5 k ekt
dt C5 L4 C5 L4 C5
1 ðiÞ 1
¼ I C5 þ iC5 ekt
C5 L4 C5 L4
ðiÞ
At fixed points: 1
C5 L4 IC5 ¼ 0; x5 k þ 1
C5 L4 iC5 ¼ 0
Rs ksin 1 1
x4 k ekt ¼ ½x2 ekt þ x4 ekt e iL ekt iC5 ekt
L6 C6 L6 6 C5 L6
Rs ksin Rs 1 1
x4 k x2 e x4 eksin iL i C5 ¼ 0
L6 L6 C6 L6 6 C5 L6
dX6 1 1 Rload2
¼ I C5 IC4 X6 eksout2
dt C5 L3 C4 L3 L3
1 1 Rload2
x6 k ekt ¼ iC5 ekt iC4 ekt x6 ekt eksout2
C5 L3 C4 L3 L3
1 1 Rload2
x6 k þ iC5 iC4 x6 eksout2 ¼0
C5 L3 C4 L3 L3
We can summery our dual band diplexer filter circuit arbitrarily small increments
equations:
Rs Rs 1 1
x2 k x2 eksin x4 eksin i C2 iL ¼ 0
L5 L5 C2 L5 C1 L5 5
1 1 Rload1
x3 k þ i C2 iC3 x3 eksout1
C2 L1 C3 L1 L1
1
¼ 0; x5 k þ iC5 ¼ 0
C5 L4
708 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
Rs ksin Rs 1 1
x4 k x2 e x4 eksin iL i C5 ¼ 0
L6 L6 C6 L6 6 C5 L6
1 1 Rload2
x6 k þ iC5 iC4 x6 eksout2 ¼0
C5 L3 C4 L3 L3
0 1 0 1
iL5 !11 !12
B C B ! !22 C
B iC3 C B 21
C
B C B
B iL C B !31 !32 C C
B 6C B C
B C B ! ! C
0 B
1 B iL4 C BC 41 42 C !
N11 . . . N1 10 Bi C B B ! ! C
C
B .. .. .. C B C5 C þ B 51 52
C
i C2
@ . . . A B C
B x2 C B !61 !62 C
N10 1 N10 10 B C B C i C5
B x C B B ! ! C
C
B 3C B 71 72
C
B C B ! !82 C
B x4 C B 81 C
B C B C
B x C @ !91 ! A
@ 5A 92
x6 ! 10 1 ! 10 2
1
¼ 0; !kl ; !61 ¼ ; !62 ¼ 0
8 k¼1;2;3;4;5;l¼1;2 C2 L5
1 1
!71 ¼ ; !72 ¼ 0; !81 ¼ 0; !82 ¼ ; !91 ¼ 0; !92
C2 L1 C5 L6
1 1
¼ ; !10 1 ¼ 0; !10 2 ¼
C5 L4 C5 L3
Assumption
0 1 0 1
!11 12 i L5
B !21 22 C B C
B C B i C3 C
B ! B C
B 32 C
C B iL C
B
31
C B 6C
B !41 42 C B C
B C 0 1 B i L4 C
B ! N11 ... N1 B C
B 52 C
C i C2 B
10 B C
C B i C5 C
B
51
C ! e; @ .. .. ..
B !61 62 C . . . AB C0
B C i C5 B x2 C
B ! N10 N10 B C
B 71 72 C
C 1 10 B x C
B 3C
B C B C
B !81 82 C B x4 C
B C B C
B ! 92 C B x C
@ 91 A @ 5A
!10 1 10 2 x6
i C2
Arbitrarily small increments iC2 ; iC5 are very small and ð Þ ! e.
i C5
7.2 Dual Band Diplexer Filter Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 709
1
N5 10 ¼ 1; N61 ¼ ; N62 ¼ 0; N63 ¼ N64 ¼ N65 ¼ 0; N66
C1 L5
Rs
¼ k eksin
L5
Rs 1
N67 ¼ 0; N68 ¼ eksin ; N69 ¼ 0; N6 10 ¼ 0; N71 ¼ 0; N72 ¼ ; N73
L5 C3 L1
¼0
Rload1
N74 ¼ N75 ¼ 0; N76 ¼ 0; N77 ¼ k eksout1 ; N78 ¼ N79 ¼ N7 10 ¼0
L1
1 Rs
N81 ¼ N82 ¼ 0; N83 ¼ ; N84 ¼ N85 ¼ 0; N86 ¼ eksin ; N87 ¼ 0
C6 L6 L6
Rs ksin
N88 ¼ k e ; N89 ¼ N8 10 ¼ 0; N91 ¼ . . . ¼ N98 ¼ 0; N99 ¼ k; N9 10
L6
¼0
1
N10 1 ¼ N10 2 ¼ N10 3 ¼ N10 4 ¼ 0; N10 5 ¼ ; N10 6 ¼ . . . ¼ N10 9
C4 L3
¼0
Rload2
N10 10 ¼ k eksout2
L3
We analyze dual band diplexer filter circuit for the following cases:
710 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
Table 7.2 Dual band diplexer filter circuit for cases of sin, sout1, sout2
Case no. sin sout1 sout2
1 0 0 0
2 s 0 0
3 0 s 0
4 0 0 s
5 s s 0
6 0 s s
7 s 0 s
8 s s s
Rload1 Rs Rs Rload2
N77 ¼ k ; N86 ¼ ; N88 ¼ k ; N10 10 ¼ k
L1 L6 L6 L3
X
10 X
10
detðA k IÞj sin ¼0 ¼ !k kk ; detðA k IÞj sin ¼0 ¼ 0 ) !k kk j sin ¼0
sout1 ¼0 sout1 ¼0 sout1 ¼0
sout2 ¼0 k¼0 sout2 ¼0 k¼0 sout2 ¼0
¼0
Dðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ ¼ detðA k IÞ; Dðk; sin ; sout1 ; sout2 Þ ¼ 0; Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ eks
Xn X
m
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ kk ; Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ; n; m 2 N0 ; n [ m
k¼0 k¼0
Pn ðk ¼ 0; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ 0; sÞ ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ q0 ðsÞ 6¼ 0 8 s 2 R þ 0
Pn ðk; sÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s for which we
assume:
(I) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R then Pn ði x; sÞ þ Qm ði x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R.
(II) lim supfjQm ðk; sÞ=Pn ðk; sÞj : jkj ! 1; Rek
0g\1 for any s.
(III) Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPn ði x; sÞj2 jQm ði x; sÞj2 for each s has at most a finite
number of real zeros.
(IV) Each positive root xðsÞ of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable in s
whenever it exists.
number of poles, and shape the filter response with great accuracy. The equivalent
circuit of a quartz crystal is describe in the below figure.
We need to measure the crystal parameters. The important parameters in our design
are: DF—frequency offset or deviation from the specific center frequency, r—series
resistance of the crystal, fL and fH—3 dB points required for the Q calculation, Lm—
motional inductance which is derived from the Q and r, Cp—parallel capacitance of the
crystal’s holder, Cm—motional capacitance. In our design the crystals can be matched
for Q, Lm and DF. Several factors influence the choice of bandwidth of a crystal filter:
the desired selectivity (narrow filters for contest work and wider filters for casual
rag-chewing), receiver sensitivity, dynamic range, and personal preference. The value
of the terminating resistance should be as low as possible to minimize the transfor-
mation ratio of the impedance matching transformers. The crystal can be forced to
resonate efficiency at odd harmonic intervals of its fundamental frequency. The
overtone modes force a crystal filter to have undesired reentrance modes (odd multiples
of the series resonant frequency). Crystals can be in larger combinations, within RF
filter packages. The crystal lattice filters contain several crystals within a single circuit
(adopted for use as a very sharp bandpass filter). The input and outputs employ RF
transformers (T1 and T2) with shunt capacitors (C1 and C2). Each set of crystals
XTAL1 plus XTAL2 and XTAL3 plus XTAL4 are cut to different frequencies. The
matched set of XTAL1 and XTAL2 having a lower resonant frequency than the other
matched set of XTAL3 and XTAL4. This structure circuit attains the desired band-
width and selectivity [107, 108].
Terminology: ip1 -input current to transformer T1’s primary coil, is1 -input current
to transformer T1’s secondary coil, ip2 -input current to transformer T2’s primary
coil, is2 -input current to transformer T2’s secondary coil
Transformer T1: vp1—transformer primary voltage, vs1—transformer secondary
voltage. /1 is the flux through a one turn coil located anywhere on the transformer
core. np1 and ns1 are the number of turns of the coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary),
respectively, then the total flux /p1 and /s1 through coils 1 and 2 respectively are
d/p1 d/s1
/p1 ¼ np1 /1 ; /s1 ¼ ns1 /; vp1 ¼ dt ; vs1 ¼ dt ; vp1 ¼ np1 dt
d/1
v ðtÞ n n v ðtÞ n p1
vs1 ¼ ns1 d/
dt ; vp1 ðtÞ ¼ vp1 ; vs1 ðtÞ ¼
1
vs1 ; vps1 ðtÞ ¼ nps1 ; a1 ¼ nps1 . vps1 ðtÞ ¼ n s1 for all
1 1 1 1
times t and for all voltages vp1 and vs1 . We define the ratio between np1 and ns1 as
n
“a1” (a1 ¼ nps1 ). Step down transformer a1 > 1 and step up transformer a1 < 1. By
1
law of conservation of energy, apparent real and reactive powers are each conserved
in the input and output (S1 ¼ Ip1 vp1 ¼ Is1 vs1 ). Ideal transformer identity:
qffiffiffiffiffi
v p1 I s1 np1 L p1
vs ¼ Ip ¼ ns ¼ Ls ¼ a 1 :
1 1 1 1
vp1 n1 n2 n2
np1 ¼ n1 ; ns1 ¼ n2 ; ¼ ; n1 ; n2 [ 1 ) vs1 ¼ vp1 ¼ VA1
vs1 n2 n1 n1
n2
¼ ½Vs ðtÞ Rs IRs
n1
714 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
vs1 ¼ VA1 nn21 ; vp1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ Rs IRs ; vs1 ¼ ½Vs ðtÞ Rs IRs nn21 (Reference direc-
tions are in the top of each transformer’s coil). np1 ip1 þ ns1 is1 ¼ 0; ip1 ¼ ip1 ðtÞ;
i ðtÞ n
is1 ¼ is1 ðtÞ; ips1 ðtÞ ¼ nps1
1 1
For all t and all currents ip1 and is1 . The voltage vp1 across coil 1 does not depend
on ip1 or on is1 ; it depends only on vs1 . Similarly the current ip1 depends only on is1
and is independent of vp1 ; vs1 . vs1 ¼ VA2 VA9
Transformer T2: vp2—transformer primary voltage, vs2—transformer secondary
voltage. /2 is the flux through a one turn coil located anywhere on the transformer
core. np2 and ns2 are the number of turns of the coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary),
respectively, then the total flux /p2 and /s2 through coils 1 and 2 respectively are
d/p2 d/ d/
/p2 ¼ np2 /2 ; /s2 ¼ ns2 /; vp2 ¼ ; vs2 ¼ s2 ; vp2 ¼ np2 2
dt dt dt
d/2 vp ðtÞ np np
vs2 ¼ ns2 ; vp2 ðtÞ ¼ vp2 ; vs2 ðtÞ ¼ vs2 ; 2 ¼ 2 ; a2 ¼ 2 :
dt vs2 ðtÞ ns2 ns 2
vs2 ¼ ½VA6 VA3 nn43 ; vp2 ¼ VA6 VA3 ; vs2 ¼ vp2 nn43 (Reference directions are in
the top of each transformer’s coil). np2 ip2 þ ns2 is2 ¼ 0; ip2 ¼ ip2 ðtÞ; is2 ¼ is2 ðtÞ;
ip2 ðtÞ n
is2 ðtÞ ¼ nps2 .
2
For all t and all currents ip2 and is2 . The voltage vp2 across coil 1 does not depend
on ip2 or on is2 ; it depends only on vs2 . Similarly the current ip2 depends only on is2
and is independent of vp2 ; vs2 . We consider for two transformers a1 6¼ a2 [24].
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 715
Remark When we have two coils of wire in close physical proximity to one
another, no importance whether or not the coils are wrapped around a common core
of magnetic material. We assume that the coils do not move with respect to one
another or with respect to a core they might be wrapped around. If we have some
ferromagnetic material in the magnetic circuit of the two coils, then when the
current sufficiently large, the relation between the fluxes /p ; /s and the currents
ip ; is are no longer linear. In this case the equations have the following form:
/p ¼ fp ðip ; is Þ; /s ¼ fs ðip ; is Þ, where fp ðip ; is Þ; fs ðip ; is Þ are nonlinear functions of the
currents ip ; is , By Faraday’s law we get the following:
for the first transformer (T1) and the second transformer (T2) in our Lattice crystal
filter circuit.
716 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
vs 2 ¼ VA14 ¼ IRload Rload ; vs1 ¼ VA2 VA9 ; vp2 ¼ VA6 VA3 ; vp1 ¼ Vs ðtÞ IRs Rs
KCL @ A2: ICp3 þ Ir3 þ ICp1 þ Ir1 þ IC1 ¼ is1 ; KCL @ A9:
is1 ¼ IC1 þ ICp2 þ Ir2 þ ICp4 þ Ir4
KCL @ A 3: ICp3 þ ILm3 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp2 þ ILm2 KCL @ A6:
ICp4 þ ILm4 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp1 þ ILm1
Z
dðVA3 VA6 Þ 1 dðVA9 VA2 Þ
IC2 ¼ C2 ) VA3 VA6 ¼ IC2 dt; IC1 ¼ C1
dt Z C2 dt
1
) VA9 VA2 ¼ IC1 dt
C1
Z
dðVA3 VA2 Þ 1 VA4 VA2
ICp3 ¼ Cp3 ) VA3 VA2 ¼ ICp3 dt; Ir3 ¼
dt Cp3 r3
) VA4 VA2 ¼ Ir3 r3
Z
dðVA5 VA4 Þ 1
ICm3 ¼ Cm3 ) VA5 VA4 ¼ ICm3 dt; VA3 VA5
dt Cm3
dILm3
¼ Lm3
dt
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 717
Z
dðVA6 VA2 Þ 1 VA7 VA2
I Cp1 ¼ Cp1 ) VA6 VA2 ¼ ICp1 dt; Ir1 ¼
dt Cp1 r1
) VA7 VA2 ¼ Ir1 r1
Z
dðVA8 VA7 Þ 1
ICm1 ¼ Cm1 ) VA8 VA7 ¼ ICm1 dt; VA6 VA8
dt Cm1
dILm1
¼ Lm1
dt
Z
dðVA9 VA3 Þ 1
ICp2 ¼ Cp2 ) VA9 VA3 ¼ ICp2 dt;
dt Cp2
VA VA10
Ir2 ¼ 9 ) VA9 VA10 ¼ Ir2 r2
r2
Z
dðVA10 VA11 Þ 1
ICm2 ¼ Cm2 ) VA10 VA11 ¼ ICm2 dt;
dt Cm2
dILm2
VA11 VA3 ¼ Lm2
dt
Z
dðVA9 VA6 Þ 1 VA VA13
ICp4 ¼ Cp4 ) VA9 VA6 ¼ ICp4 dt; Ir4 ¼ 9 ) VA9 VA13 ¼ Ir4 r4
dt Cp4 r4
Z
dðVA13 VA12 Þ 1 dILm4
ICm4 ¼ Cm4 ) VA13 VA12 ¼ ICm4 dt; VA12 VA6 ¼ Lm4
dt Cm 4 dt
dILm 1 dIL
VA6 VA8 ¼ Lm1 ; VA9 VA10 ¼ Ir2 r2 ; VA11 VA3 ¼ Lm2 m 2 ; VA9 VA13
dt dt
¼ Ir 4 r4
dILm 4
VA12 VA6 ¼ Lm4
dt
&&&
Z Z
1 1
VA9 VA2 ¼ IC1 dt ) VA2 ¼ VA9 IC1 dt
C1 C1
Z Z
1 1
VA3 VA2 ¼ ICp 3 dt ) VA3 ¼ VA2 þ ICp 3 dt
Cp3 Cp3
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA3 ¼ VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp 3 dt; VA6 VA2 ¼ ICp 1 dt
C1 Cp 3 Cp1
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA6 ¼ VA2 þ ICp 1 dt ¼ VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp 1 dt
Cp 1 C1 Cp 1
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA3 VA6 ¼ IC2 dt ) ICp 3 dt ICp 1 dt
C2 Z Cp 3 Cp1
1
¼ IC2 dt
C2
Z Z Z
d 1 1 1 1 1
f ICp 3 dt ICp 1 dt ¼ IC2 dtg ) ICp 3 I Cp 1
dt Cp3 Cp 1 C2 Cp3 Cp 1
1
¼ I C2
C2
Z Z
1 1
VA9 VA3 ¼ ICp2 dt ) VA9 ¼ VA3 þ ICp2 dt
Cp2 Cp2
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA9 ¼ VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp3 dt þ ICp2 dt
C1 Cp3 Cp2
Z Z Z
1 1 1
IC1 dt þ ICp3 dt þ ICp2 dt ¼ 0
C1 Cp3 Cp2
Z Z Z
d 1 1 1 1
f IC1 dt þ ICp3 dt þ ICp2 dt ¼ 0g; IC1
dt C1 Cp3 Cp2 C1
1 1
¼ I Cp3 þ I Cp2
Cp3 Cp2
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 719
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA9 VA6 ¼ IC dt ) IC1 dt ICp1 dt
Cp4 Z p4 C1 Cp1
1
¼ ICp4 dt
Cp4
Z Z Z
d 1 1 1 1 1
f IC1 dt ICp1 dt ¼ ICp4 dtg ) IC1 I Cp1
dt C1 Cp1 Cp4 C1 Cp1
1
¼ I Cp4
Cp4
Z
1
VA4 VA2 ¼ Ir3 r3 ) VA4 ¼ VA2 þ Ir3 r3 ¼ VA9 IC1 dt þ Ir3 r3
C1
dILm3 dILm3
VA3 VA5 ¼ Lm3 ) VA5 ¼ VA3 Lm3
dt dt
Z Z
1 1 dILm3
¼ VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp3 dt Lm3
C1 Cp3 dt
Z
1
VA7 VA2 ¼ Ir1 r1 ) VA7 ¼ VA2 þ Ir1 r1 ¼ VA9 IC1 dt þ Ir1 r1
C1
dILm1 dILm1
VA6 VA8 ¼ Lm1 ) VA8 ¼ VA6 Lm1
dt dt
Z Z
1 1 dILm1
¼ VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp1 dt Lm1
C1 Cp1 dt
VA9 VA10 ¼ Ir2 r2 ) VA10 ¼ VA9 Ir2 r2 ;
dILm2 dILm2
VA11 VA3 ¼ Lm2 ) VA11 ¼ VA3 þ Lm2
dt dt
Z Z
1 1 dILm2
VA11 ¼ VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp3 dt þ Lm2 ;
C1 Cp3 dt
VA9 VA13 ¼ Ir4 r4 ) VA13 ¼ VA9 Ir4 r4
dILm4 dILm4
VA12 VA6 ¼ Lm4 ) VA12 ¼ VA6 þ Lm4
dt dt
Z Z
1 1 dILm4
¼ VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp1 dt þ Lm4
C1 Cp1 dt
Remark A
Z Z
1 1 dILm3
VA5 VA4 ¼ ICm3 dt; ICp3 dt Lm3 Ir3 r3
Cm3 Z Cp3 dt
1
¼ ICm3 dt
Cm3
720 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
Z Z
1 1 dILm3
VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp3 dt Lm3
C1 Z Cp3 dt
1
½VA9 IC1 dt þ Ir3 r3
Z C1
1
¼ ICm3 dt
Cm3
Z Z
d 1 dILm3 1
f ICp3 dt Lm3 Ir 3 r3 ¼ ICm3 dtg
dt Cp3 dt Cm3
1 d 2 ILm3 dIr3 1
) I C p 3 Lm 3 r3 ¼ ICm3
Cp3 dt2 dt Cm3
Remark B
Z Z
1 1 dILm1
VA8 VA7 ¼ ICm1 dt; ICp1 dt Lm1 Ir1 r1
Cm1 Z Cp1 dt
1
¼ ICm1 dt
Cm1
Z Z
1 1 dILm1
VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp1 dt Lm1
C1 Z Cp1 dt
1
½VA9 IC1 dt þ Ir1 r1
Z C1
1
¼ ICm1 dt
Cm1
Z Z
d 1 dILm1 1
f ICp1 dt Lm1 Ir 1 r1 ¼ ICm1 dtg
dt Cp1 dt Cm1
1 d 2 ILm1 dIr1 1
) I C p 1 Lm 1 r1 ¼ ICm1
Cp1 dt2 dt Cm1
Remark C
Z
1 dIr 1 1 d 2 ILm2
VA10 VA11 ¼ ICm2 dt; 2 r2 þ I C1 I C p 3 Lm 2
Cm2 dt C1 Cp3 dt2
1
¼ ICm2
Cm2
Z Z
1 1 dILm2
VA9 Ir2 r2 ½VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp3 dt þ Lm2
Z C1 Cp3 dt
1
¼ ICm2 dt
Cm2
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 721
Z Z Z
1 1 dILm2 1
Ir2 r2 þ I C1 dt ICp3 dt Lm2 ¼ ICm2 dt
C1 Cp3 dt Cm2
Z Z Z
d 1 1 dILm2 1
fIr2 r2 þ IC1 dt ICp3 dt Lm2 ¼ ICm2 dtg
dt C1 Cp3 dt Cm2
dIr2 1 1 d 2 ILm2 1
r2 þ I C1 ICp3 Lm2 ¼ ICm2
dt C1 Cp3 dt2 Cm2
Remark D
Z
1 dIr 1 1 d 2 I Lm 4
VA13 VA12 ¼ ICm4 dt; 4 r4 þ I C1 I C p 1 Lm 4
Cm4 dt C1 Cp1 dt2
1
¼ I Cm 4
Cm4
Z Z
1 1 dILm4
VA9 Ir4 r4 ½VA9 IC1 dt þ ICp1 dt þ Lm4
Z C1 Cp1 dt
1
¼ ICm4 dt
Cm4
Z Z Z
1 1 dILm4 1
Ir4 r4 þ I C1 dt ICp1 dt Lm4 ¼ ICm4 dt
C1 Cp1 dt Cm4
Z Z Z
d 1 1 dILm4 1
fIr4 r4 þ I C1 dt ICp1 dt Lm4 ¼ ICm4 dtg
dt C1 Cp1 dt Cm4
dIr4 1 1 d 2 ILm4 1
r4 þ I C1 ICp1 Lm4 ¼ ICm4
dt C1 Cp1 dt2 Cm4
Lattice crystal filter differential equations group No. 2:
1 1 1 1
ICp3 I Cp1 ¼ IC2 ; IC1
Cp3 Cp1 C2 C1
1 1 1 1 1
¼ I Cp3 þ ICp2 ; IC1 I Cp1 ¼ I Cp4
Cp3 Cp2 C1 Cp1 Cp4
dIr2 1 1 d 2 ILm2 1
r2 þ I C1 ICp3 Lm2 ¼ ICm2
dt C1 Cp3 dt2 Cm2
dIr4 1 1 d 2 ILm4 1
r4 þ I C1 ICp1 Lm4 ¼ ICm4
dt C1 Cp1 dt2 Cm4
1 1 1 1
I Cp3 I Cp1 ¼ I C2 ; I C1
Cp3 Cp1 C2 C1
1 1 1 1 1
¼ I Cp3 þ I Cp2 ; I C1 I Cp1 ¼ I Cp4
Cp3 Cp2 C1 Cp1 Cp4
dILm2 1 1 d 2 ILm2 1
r2 þ I C1 I C p 3 Lm 2 2
¼ ILm2
dt C1 Cp3 dt Cm2
dILm4 1 1 d 2 ILm4 1
r4 þ I C1 I C p 1 Lm 4 ¼ ILm4
dt C1 Cp1 dt2 Cm4
KCL @ A2: ICp3 þ ILm3 þ ICp1 þ ILm1 þ IC1 ¼ is1 ; KCL @ A9:
is1 ¼ IC1 þ ICp2 þ ILm2 þ ICp4 þ ILm4
KCL @ A 3: ICp3 þ ILm3 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp2 þ ILm2 KCL @ A6:
ICp4 þ ILm4 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp1 þ ILm1
Lattice crystal filter circuit transformer T1’s secondary coil current differential
equation:
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 723
ip1 ðtÞ ns n2 n1
¼ 1 ¼ ) is1 ðtÞ ¼ ip1 ðtÞ ; is1 ¼ is1 ðtÞ; ip1 ¼ ip1 ðtÞ; is1
is1 ðtÞ np 1 n1 n2
n1
¼ ip1
n2
d
vs1 ¼ VC1 ¼ ðVA9 VA2 Þ ) VA9 VA2 ¼ vs1 ; IC1 ¼ C1 ðVA9 VA2 Þ; IC1
dt
dvs
¼ C1 1
dt
n2 n2 dip dis n2
ip1 ¼ IRs ; vs1 ¼ ½Vs ðtÞ Rs ip1 ; ip1 ¼ is1 ) 1 ¼ 1
n1 n1 dt dt n1
Lattice crystal filter circuit transformer T2’s primary coil current differential
equation:
ip2 ðtÞ ns n4 ip
IRload ¼ is2 ; vp2 ¼ VC2 ; ¼ 2 ¼ ; ip2 ¼ ip2 ðtÞ; is2 ¼ is2 ðtÞ; 2
is2 ðtÞ np 2 n3 is2
n4
¼
n3
n4 n4 n3 n3
vs2 ¼ vp2 ¼ ½VA6 VA3 ; VA6 VA3 ¼ vs2 ; VA3 VA6 ¼ vs2 ; vs2
n3 n3 n4 n4
¼ is2 Rload
d d n3
IC2 ¼ C2 ½VA VA6 ; vs2 ¼ VRload ; IC2 ¼ C2 ½vs2 ; IC2
dt 3 dt n4
n3 dvs2
¼ C2
n4 dt
&&&
1 1 1 1
I Cp3 I Cp1 ¼ I C2 ; I C1
Cp3 Cp1 C2 C1
1 1 1 1 1
¼ I Cp3 þ I Cp2 ; I C1 I Cp1 ¼ I Cp4
Cp3 Cp2 C1 Cp1 Cp4
KCL @ A2: ICp3 þ ILm3 þ ICp1 þ ILm1 þ IC1 ¼ is1 ; KCL @ A9:
is1 ¼ IC1 þ ICp2 þ ILm2 þ ICp4 þ ILm4
KCL @ A 3: ICp3 þ ILm3 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp2 þ ILm2 KCL @ A6:
ICp4 þ ILm4 þ IC2 ¼ ip2 þ ICp1 þ ILm1
Find circuit variables ICp1 ; ICp2 ; ICp3 ; ICp4 as a function of circuit variables
ILm1 ; ILm2 ; ILm3 ; ILm4 and circuit parameters Version No. 1:
1 1 1 1
I Cp1 I Cp2 I Cp3 þ ICp4 ¼ 0;
Cp1 Cp2 Cp3 Cp4
ICp3 þ ICp1 ICp2 ICp4 ¼ ILm1 þ ILm2 ILm3 þ ILm4
C2 C2 C2
I C2 ¼ I Cp3 I Cp1 ; I Cp1
Cp3 Cp1 Cp1
C2
þ I Cp2 ½ þ 1 ICp3 ¼ ip2 ILm2 þ ILm3
Cp3
C2 C2 C2 C2
I C2 ¼ I Cp3 I Cp1 ; ½ þ 1 ICp1 ICp3 ICp4 ¼ ip2 ILm1 þ ILm4
Cp3 Cp1 Cp1 Cp3
X
4
ILmk ð1Þk ¼ ILm1 þ ILm2 ILm3 þ ILm4 ; ip2 ILm2 þ ILm3
k¼1
X
3
¼ ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1
k¼2
X
4
ip2 ILm1 þ ILm4 ¼ ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk
k¼1
k 6¼ 2
k 6¼ 3
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 725
Find circuit variables ICp1 ; ICp2 ; ICp3 ; ICp4 as a function of circuit variables
ILm1 ; ILm2 ; ILm3 ; ILm4 and circuit parameters Version No. 2:
1 1 1 1
I Cp1 I Cp2 I Cp3 þ ICp4 ¼ 0;
Cp1 Cp2 Cp3 Cp4
X4
I Cp3 þ I Cp1 I Cp2 I Cp4 ¼ ILmk ð1Þk
k¼1
C2 C2 X3
ICp1 þ ICp2 ½ þ 1 ICp3 ¼ ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1
Cp1 Cp3 k¼2
C2 C2 X4
½ þ 1 ICp1 ICp3 ICp4 ¼ ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk
Cp1 Cp3 k¼1
k¼
6 2
k¼6 3
Find circuit variables ICp1 ; ICp2 ; ICp3 ; ICp4 as a function of circuit variables
ILm1 ; ILm2 ; ILm3 ; ILm4 and circuit parameters Version No. 3:
0 1 0 1
1
C p1 ! Cp1 !
Cp1 3 1
B 1
C B 1 C C p4
@ A þ I Cp2 þ I Cp3 @ ½CCp23 þ 1 A þ ICp4
C2 2
I Cp1 C p1
1
1
1
0
C2 0 C 1
þ1 2
C p1 Cp3
0 0 1
P
4
B C
ILm ð1Þk
B C
k
k¼1
B P 3 C
B ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 C
¼B C
B k¼2
C
B ip þ P 4
k C
@ 2 ILmk ð1Þ
A
k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
1 1 1 1
I Cp1 ICp2 I Cp3 þ ICp4 ¼ 0 ) ICp1
Cp1 Cp2 Cp3 Cp4
Cp Cp Cp
¼ 1 ICp2 þ 1 ICp3 1 ICp4
Cp2 Cp3 Cp4
Cp1 Cp Cp X4
½ 1 ICp2 þ ½ 1 þ 1 ICp3 ½ 1 þ 1 ICp4 ¼ ILmk ð1Þk
Cp2 Cp3 Cp4 k¼1
C2 C2 X3
½ þ 1 ICp2 ICp3 ICp4 ¼ ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1
Cp2 Cp4 k¼2
726 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
½ þ 1 1 ICp2 þ 1 ICp3 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ICp4
Cp1 Cp2 Cp3 Cp1 Cp4
X 4
¼ ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk
k¼1
k 6¼ 2
k 6¼ 3
We can summery our circuit variables ICp1 ; ICp2 ; ICp3 ; ICp4 as a function of circuit
variables ILm1 ; ILm2 ; ILm3 ; ILm4 and circuit parameters Version No. 4:
Cp1 Cp Cp
I Cp1 ¼ I Cp2 þ 1 I Cp3 1 I Cp4
Cp2 Cp3 Cp4
0 1 0 1
Cp
½Cp1 1 Cp ! Cp
½Cp1 þ 1
½Cp1 þ 1
B 2
C B 4
C
A I Cp2 þ I Cp3 þ @ A I Cp4
C 3 C
@ ½ 2 þ 1
Cp2 1
C p1
2
C p4
C Cp C Cp
½ 2 þ 1 1 C p3 ð½ 2 þ 1 1 þ 1Þ
0 1
Cp1 Cp2 Cp1 Cp4
P
4
ILmk ð1Þk
B k¼1 C
B C
B ip þ P3
C
B 2 ILm ð1Þ k þ 1
C
¼B k¼2
k
C
B P 4 C
B ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk C
@ k¼1
A
k6¼2
k6¼3
We use Cramer’s rule for the solution of above linear equations. Each variable
(Cpk ; k ¼ 2; 3; 4) given by a quotient two determinants.
0 C C C 1
½Cpp1 1 ½Cpp1 þ 1 ½Cpp1 þ 1
B 2 3 4
C
D ¼ detB
@ ½CCp2 þ 1
2
1 CCp2
4
C
A
C Cp 1 C
½CCp2 þ 1 Cpp1 Cp 3 ð½CCp2 þ 1 Cpp1 þ 1Þ
1 2 1 4
0 1
Cp1 1 CCp2
D¼½ @
1 det Cp
4
A ½Cp1 þ 1
Cp1
Cp2 1
C p3 ð½Cp þ 1 Cp þ 1Þ
C 2 Cp3
0 C 1 4
1
½Cp2 þ 1 CCp2
@
det C
2 4
A ½Cp1 þ 1
Cp1 Cp1
½Cp þ 1 Cp ð½Cp þ 1 Cp þ 1Þ
2 C2 Cp4
0 1C 2
11 4
½Cp2 þ 1 1
@
det C
2
A; D ¼ DðCp1 ; . . .; Cp4 ; C2 Þ
C C
½Cp2 þ 1 Cpp1 Cpp1
1 2 3
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 727
0 1
Cp1
P
4 Cp ½ þ 1
B ILmk ð1Þk ½ 1 þ 1 Cp4 C
B Cp3 C
B k¼1 C
B C
B ip þ P IL ð1Þk þ 1
3
1 Cp2
C
C
DICp2 B
¼ detB 4 C
C
2 mk
k¼2
B C2 Cp C
B þ 1Þ C
B i þ P I ð1Þk þ 1 1
4 Cp1 ð½ C
@ p2 Lmk
Cp3
Cp1 Cp4 A
k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
!
X
4 C2 Cp
ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ
C
k Cp2
DICp2 ¼ ð ILmk ð1Þ Þ det 1 C p1
4
Cp1 Cp4
k¼1 C p3
0 1
P3 C2
B i p2
þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 C
B k¼2 Cp4 C
Cp1 B C
½ þ 1 detB P
Cp1 C
Cp3 B 4 C2
ð½Cp þ 1 þ 1 ÞC
@ ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk 1 Cp4 A
k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
0 1
P
3
kþ1
B ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þ 1 C
B k¼2 C
C B C
½Cpp1 þ 1 detB C p1 C
B ip þ P IL ð1Þk
4
4 C p3 C
@ 2 mk
k¼1
A
k6¼2
k6¼3
X
4
C2 Cp Cp C2
DICp2 ¼ ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ ½ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ þ 1
k¼1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp3 Cp4
Cp C2 Cp C2 Cp
½ 1 þ 1 ½ip2 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ
Cp3 Cp1 Cp4 Cp1 Cp4
X3
C2 C2 X 4
Cp
ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk ½ 1 þ 1
k¼2
Cp4 Cp4 k¼1 Cp4
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 Cp X 3 X4
½ip2 þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk
Cp3 Cp3 k¼2 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
728 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
X
4
C2 Cp Cp C2
DICp2 ¼ ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ ½ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ þ 1
k¼1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp3 Cp4
Cp C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
ip2 ½ 1 þ 1 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ þ ½ 1 þ 1 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ
Cp3 Cp1 Cp4 Cp3 Cp1 Cp4
X3
Cp C2 C2 Cp1 X4
ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 þ ip2 ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk
k¼2
C p3 Cp4 C p4 C p3 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 Cp Cp Cp X3
Cp
þ ip2 ½ þ 1 1 1 ½ 1 þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 þ ½ 1 þ 1 ip2
Cp4 Cp3 Cp3 Cp4 k¼2
Cp4
C P
4
½Cpp1 þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk
4 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X
4
C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
DICp2 ¼ ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ ½ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ þ 1 þ ½ 1 þ 1
k¼1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp3 Cp4 Cp3
C2 Cp X3
C2 Cp1
ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 ½ þ 1
Cp1 Cp4 k¼2
C p4 Cp3
X
4
Cp1 Cp1 X3
Cp
ILmk ð1Þk ½ þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 ½ 1 þ 1
k¼1
Cp3 Cp4 k¼2
Cp4
k6¼2
k6¼3
X
4
Cp C2 Cp C2 Cp
ILmk ð1Þk þ ip2 f½ 1 þ 1 ½ 1 þ 1 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ
k¼1
Cp3 Cp4 Cp3 Cp1 Cp4
k6¼2
k6¼3
C C C
þ ½Cpp1 þ 1 Cpp1 þ ½Cpp1 þ 1g
4 3 4
Cp1 C2 Cp C2 Cp Cp
C1 ¼ ½ þ 1 ½ 1 þ 1 ðð þ 1Þ 1 þ 1Þ þ ½ 1 þ 1
Cp3 Cp4 Cp3 Cp1 Cp4 Cp4
Cp1 Cp1
þ½ þ 1
Cp3 Cp4
X
4
C2 Cp Cp C2
w1 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ ¼ ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ ½ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ þ 1
k¼1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp3 Cp4
Cp1 C2 Cp X
3
C2 Cp1 X4
þ½ þ 1 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 ½ þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk
Cp3 Cp1 Cp4 k¼2
Cp4 Cp3 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 Cp1 X3
Cp X4
½ þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 ½ 1 þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk
Cp3 Cp4 k¼2
C p4 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
0 1
C P
4
k C
B 1 ½Cpp1 ILmk ð1Þ ½Cpp1 þ 1 C
B 2
k¼1 4 C
B P C
B C2 3 C
B ½ þ 1 ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 CCp2 C
DICp3 ¼ detB Cp2 C
B C
4
k¼2
B C P
4 C
B ½ 2 þ 1 Cp1 ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk ð½CCp2 þ 1 Cpp1
C
þ 1Þ C
@ Cp 1 Cp2
k¼1 1 4
A
k6¼2
k6¼3
0 1
P3
B ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 CCp2 C
B k¼2 4 C
Cp B C
DICp3 ¼ ½ 1 1 detB C
B ip þ P IL ð1Þk
4
þ 1Þ C
Cp2 C
@ 2 mk
ð½CCp2 þ 1 Cpp1 A
k¼1 1 4
k6¼2
k6¼3
0 1
X
4 ½CCp2 þ 1 CCp2
ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ det@ A
2 4
C C
k¼1 ½CCp2 þ 1 Cpp1 ð½CCp2 þ 1 Cpp1 þ 1Þ
0 1 2 1 4
1
P3
kþ1
B ½CCp2
þ 1 ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þ C
B 2
k¼2 C
Cp1 B C
½ þ 1 detB P4 C
Cp4 B ½ C2 þ 1 Cp1 ip2 þ k C
ILmk ð1Þ A
@ Cp1 Cp2
k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 C2 Cp C2 Cp X3
DICp3 ¼ ½ 1 fip2 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1
Cp2 Cp1 C p4 C p1 Cp4 k¼2
C2 C2 X 4 X4
C2 Cp C2 C2 C2 Cp
ip2 þ IL ð1Þk g ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ fð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1 1 g
Cp4 Cp4 k¼1 mk k¼1
C p1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp1 Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 C2 C2 X4
C2 Cp C2 Cp X 3
½ þ 1 fip2 ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ ½ þ 1 1 ip2 ½ þ 1 1 IL ð1Þk þ 1 g
Cp4 Cp2 Cp2 k¼1
Cp1 C p2 Cp1 Cp2 k¼2 mk
k6¼2
k6¼3
730 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
C p1 C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
DICp3 ¼ ip2 ½ 1 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ½ 1 1 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ
C p2 Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp1 C p4
X3
Cp C2 Cp C2 X4
ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 ip2 ½ 1 1 þ ½ 1 1 ILmk ð1Þk
k¼2
Cp 2
Cp 4
Cp 2
Cp 4 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
X
4
C2 Cp C2 C2 C2 Cp
ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ fð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1 1 g
k¼1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp1 C p2
Cp1 C2 Cp C2 X4
þ i p2 ½ þ 1 ½ þ 1 ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk
Cp4 Cp2 C p4 C p2 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp X 3
½ þ 1 ½ þ 1 1 ip2 þ ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 1 IL ð1Þk þ 1
Cp4 Cp1 C p2 Cp4 Cp1 Cp2 k¼2 mk
Cp1 C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
DICp3 ¼ ip2 f½ 1 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ½ 1 1 þ ½ 1 þ 1
Cp2 Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp4
C2 Cp1 C2 Cp1 Cp1 C2 Cp
½ þ 1½ þ 1 ½ þ 1 g½ 1 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ
Cp2 Cp4 Cp1 Cp2 Cp2 Cp1 Cp4
X3
Cp C2 X 4 X4
ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 þ ½ 1 1 ILmk ð1Þk ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ
k¼2
C p2 C p4 k¼1 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
C2 Cp C2 C2 C2 Cp Cp C2
fð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1 1 g ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp1 Cp2 Cp4 Cp2
X4
Cp C2 Cp X 3
ILmk ð1Þk þ ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ 1
k¼1
C p4
C p1
C p2 k¼2
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp C2
C2 ¼ ½ 1 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ½ 1 1 þ ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1
Cp2 Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp4 Cp2
Cp C2 Cp
½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 1
Cp4 Cp1 Cp2
Cp1 C2 Cp
w2 ðILm k ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½ 1 ð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ
Cp2 Cp1 Cp4
X
3
Cp C2 X 4 X 4
ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 þ ½ 1 1 ILmk ð1Þk ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ
k¼2
Cp2 Cp4 k¼1 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
C2 Cp C2 C2 C2 Cp Cp
fð½ þ 1 1 þ 1Þ ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1 1 g ½ 1 þ 1
Cp1 Cp4 Cp2 Cp4 Cp1 Cp2 Cp4
C2 X4
Cp C2 Cp X 3
½ þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 1 IL ð1Þk þ 1
Cp2 k¼1
Cp4 C p1 Cp2 k¼2 mk
k6¼2
k6¼3
0 1
C C P
4
k
B 1
½Cpp1 ½Cpp1 þ 1 ILmk ð1Þ C
B 2 3
k¼1 C
B P C
B C2 3
kþ1 C
B ½ þ 1 1 ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þ C
DICp4 ¼ detB Cp2 C
B k¼2 C
B C P4 C
B ½ 2 þ 1 Cp1 C p1
ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk C
@ Cp1 C p2 C p3
k¼1
A
k6¼2
k6¼3
0 1
P
3
kþ1
B 1 ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þ C
B k¼2 C
Cp1 B C
DICp4 ¼½ 1 detB Cp P4 C
Cp2 B 1 ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk C
@ Cp3 k¼1
A
k6¼2
k6¼3
0 1
P
3
B ½CCp2 þ 1 ip2 þ ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 C
B 2
k¼2 C
Cp1 B C
½ þ 1 detB P
4 C
Cp3 B ½ C2 þ 1 Cp1 ip2 þ k C
ILmk ð1Þ A
@ Cp1 C p2
k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
! 0 1
X
4 ½CCp2 þ 1 1
þ ILmk ð1Þk det@ A
2
C Cp1
k¼1 ½CCp2 þ 1 Cpp1 Cp3
1 2
732 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
Cp1 X4
Cp Cp X 3
DICp4 ¼ ½ 1 fip2 ILmk ð1Þk þ ip2 1 1 IL ð1Þk þ 1 g
Cp2 k¼1
Cp3 Cp3 k¼2 mk
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 C2 C2 X4
C2 Cp
½ þ 1 fip2 ½ þ 1 þ ½ þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ ip2 ½ þ 1 1
Cp3 Cp2 Cp2 k¼1
Cp1 Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3
C2 Cp X 3 X 4
C2 Cp C2 Cp
½ þ 1 1 IL ð1Þk þ 1 g þ ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ f½ þ 1 1 þ ½ þ 1 1 g
Cp1 Cp2 k¼2 mk k¼1
C p2
C p 3
C p1
Cp 2
Cp Cp X4
Cp Cp Cp
DICp4 ¼ ½ 1 1 ip2 ½ 1 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ ip2 ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 1
Cp2 Cp2 k¼1
C p2
C p3
Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 X3
Cp C2 Cp C2
IL ð1Þk þ 1 þ ip2 ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1
Cp3 k¼2 mk Cp3 Cp2 Cp3 Cp2
X
4
Cp C2 Cp Cp C2 Cp
ILmk ð1Þk ip2 ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 1 þ ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 1
k¼1
Cp3 Cp1 Cp2 Cp3 Cp1 Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3
X
3 X
4
C2 Cp C2 Cp
ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 þ ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ f½ þ 1 1 þ ½ þ 1 1 g
k¼2 k¼1
C p2 Cp3 C p1 C p2
Cp1 Cp Cp Cp C2 Cp
DICp4 ¼ ip2 f½ 1 þ ½ 1 1 1 þ ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 ½ 1 þ 1
Cp2 Cp2 Cp3 Cp3 Cp2 Cp3
C2 Cp Cp X4
Cp
½ þ 1 1 g ½ 1 1 ILmk ð1Þk ½ 1 1
Cp1 Cp2 Cp2 k¼1
Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 X3
Cp C2 X4
ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk
Cp3 k¼2 Cp3 Cp2 k¼1
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 C2 Cp X 3 X4
þ½ þ 1 ½ þ 1 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 þ ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ
Cp3 Cp1 Cp2 k¼2 k¼1
C2 Cp C2 Cp
f½ þ 1 1 þ ½ þ 1 1 g
Cp2 Cp3 Cp1 Cp2
Cp Cp Cp Cp C2 Cp C2
C3 ¼ ½ 1 1 þ ½ 1 1 1 þ ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1
Cp2 Cp2 Cp3 Cp3 Cp2 Cp3 Cp1
Cp
1
Cp2
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 733
C p1 X4
Cp
w3 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ ¼ ½ 1 ILmk ð1Þk ½ 1 1
C p2 k¼1
Cp2
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 X3
Cp C2 X4
Cp C2
ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1 ILmk ð1Þk þ ½ 1 þ 1 ½ þ 1
Cp3 k¼2 Cp3 Cp2 k¼1
Cp 3 Cp1
k6¼2
k6¼3
Cp1 X3 X 4
C2 Cp C2 Cp
ILmk ð1Þk þ 1 þ ð ILmk ð1Þk Þ f½ þ 1 1 þ ½ þ 1 1 g
Cp2 k¼2 k¼1
Cp2 Cp3 Cp1 Cp2
Cp1 C1 C2 C3 Cp w w w
ICp1 ¼ ip2 ½ þ þ 1 ½ 1 þ 2 3
D Cp2 Cp3 Cp4 D Cp2 Cp3 Cp4
C1 C2 C3 w w w Cp Cp
C4 ¼ þ ; w ¼ 1 þ 2 3 ; ICp1 ¼ ip2 1 C4 þ 1 w4
Cp2 Cp3 Cp4 4 Cp2 Cp3 Cp4 D D
dILm2 1 1 d 2 ILm2 1
r2 þ I C1 I C p 3 Lm 2 2
¼ ILm2
dt C1 Cp3 dt Cm2
dILm4 1 1 d 2 ILm4 1
r4 þ I C1 I C p 1 Lm 4 ¼ ILm4
dt C1 Cp1 dt2 Cm4
734 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
1 dY3 1 1 dY1
ICp3 Lm3 Y3 r 3 ¼ ILm3 ; ICp1 Lm1 Y 1 r1
Cp3 dt Cm3 Cp1 dt
1
¼ ILm1
Cm1
dY3 1 r3 1 dY1
¼ I C p 3 Y3 ILm3 ;
dt Cp3 Lm3 Lm3 Cm3 Lm3 dt
1 r1 1
¼ I C p 1 Y1 ILm1
Cp1 Lm1 Lm1 Cm1 Lm1
dY2 r2 1 1 1
¼ Y2 þ I C1 I Cp3 ILm2
dt Lm2 C1 Lm2 Cp3 Lm2 Cm2 Lm2
dY4 r4 1 1 1
¼ Y4 þ I C1 I Cp1 ILm4
dt Lm4 C1 Lm4 Cp1 Lm4 Cm4 Lm4
dY3 1 C2 w2 r3 1
¼ ½ip2 þ Y3 ILm3
dt Cp3 Lm3 D D Lm3 Cm3 Lm3
dY1 1 Cp Cp r1 1
¼ ½ip2 1 C4 þ 1 w4 Y1 I Lm 1
dt Cp1 Lm1 D D Lm1 Cm1 Lm1
dY2 r2 1 1 C2 w2 1
¼ Y2 þ I C1 ½ip2 þ ILm2
dt Lm2 C1 Lm2 Cp3 Lm2 D D Cm2 Lm2
dY4 r4 1 1 Cp Cp 1
¼ Y4 þ I C1 ½ip2 1 C4 þ 1 w4
dt Lm4 C1 Lm4 Cp1 Lm4 D D Cm4 Lm4
ILm4
dILm1
At fixed points (equilibrium points): dYk
dt ¼ 0 8 k = 1,2,3; 4; dt ¼0
dVs ðtÞ n2
Assumption dt ! e. IC1 C11Rs n12 ! e ) IC 1 ¼ 0; IC 2 ¼ 0:
2
dY1 1 Cp Cp 1
¼0) ½i 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðILm ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ I ¼ 0
dt Cp1 Lm1 p2 D D k Cm1 Lm1 Lm1
dY2 1 C2 w2 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ 1
¼0) ½ip2 þ I ¼ 0
dt Cp3 Lm2 D D Cm2 Lm2 Lm2
dY3 1 C2 w2 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ 1
¼0) ½ip2 þ I ¼ 0
dt Cp3 Lm3 D D Cm3 Lm3 Lm3
736 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
dY4 1 Cp Cp 1
¼0) ½i 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðILm ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ I ¼ 0
dt C p 1 L m4 p 2 D D k C m 4 L m 4 L m4
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of Lattice crystal filter circuit consists in adding to its coordi-
nated [Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 ILm1 ILm2 ILm3 ILm4 is1 ip2 ] arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential terms ½y1 y2 y3 y4 iLm1 iLm2 iLm3 iLm4 i0s1 i0p2 ekt , and retaining the first order
terms in y1 y2 y3 y4 iLm1 iLm2 iLm3 iLm4 i0s1 i0p2 . The system of ten homogeneous equations
leads to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvaluek. The polynomial
characteristic equation accepts by set the Lattice crystal filter circuit equations. The
Lattice crystal filter circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of expo-
nential form ½y1 y2 y3 y4 iLm1 iLm2 iLm3 iLm4 i0s1 i0p2 ekt are; i = 0 (first fixed point),
i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2 ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3 ekt ; Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
ILm1 ðtÞ ¼ ILm þ iLm1 ekt ; ILm2 ðtÞ ¼ ILm þ iLm2 ekt ;
1 2
ðiÞ kt ðiÞ
ILm3 ðtÞ ¼ I Lm þ iLm3 e ; ILm4 ðtÞ ¼ I Lm þ iLm4 ekt
3 4
is1 ðtÞ ¼ isðiÞ1 þ i0s1 ekt ; ip2 ðtÞ ¼ ipðiÞ2 þ i0p2 ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
IC2 ðtÞ ¼ IC2 þ iC2 ekt ; IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IC1 þ iC1 ekt
C1 C1 C1 C2 C1
I C1 ¼ ICp3 þ ICp2 ¼ ip2 ½ þ
Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 Cp2
C1 1 1
þ ½ w ðIL ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ þ
D Cp3 2 mk Cp2
w1 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ
C1 C1 C1 C3
I C1 ¼ ICp4 þ ICp1 ¼ ip2 ½ þ C4
Cp4 Cp1 D Cp4
C1 1
þ ½ w ðIL ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ
D Cp4 3 mk
þ w4 ðILmk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; Cp1 ; Cp1 ; . . .Þ
dVs ðtÞ
Lattice crystal filter differential equations group No. 8: dt !e
dY3 1 C2 w2 r3 1
¼ ½ip2 þ Y3 ILm3
dt Cp3 Lm3 D D Lm3 Cm3 Lm3
dY1 1 Cp Cp r1 1
¼ ½ip2 1 C4 þ 1 w4 Y1 I Lm 1
dt Cp1 Lm1 D D Lm1 Cm1 Lm1
dY2 r2 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
¼ Y2 þ ðip2 ½ þ þ ½ w þ w Þ
dt Lm2 C1 Lm2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Cp2 1
1 C2 w2 1
½ip2 þ ILm2
Cp3 Lm2 D D Cm2 Lm2
dY4 r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
¼ Y4 þ ðip2 ½ þ þ ½ w þ w Þ
dt Lm4 C1 Lm4 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Cp2 1
1 Cp Cp 1
½ip2 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ILm4
Cp1 Lm4 D D Cm4 Lm4
Remark
For k < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 unstable.
Our Lattice crystal filter circuit tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for
k < 0, t > 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the
eigenvalue parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or unstable,
additionally his absolute value |k| establish the speed of flow toward or away from
the selected fixed point [2–4].
dY1 1 Cp Cp r1 1
¼ ½ip2 1 C4 þ 1 w4 Y1 I Lm 1
dt Cp1 Lm1 D D Lm1 Cm1 Lm1
1 Cp Cp
y1 k ekt ¼ ½ðipðiÞ2 þ i0p2 ekt Þ 1 C4 þ 1 ðw4 ðILm Þ þ w4 ðiLmk ekt ÞÞ
Cp1 Lm1 D D k
ðiÞ r1 1 ðiÞ
½Y1 þ y1 ekt ½I þ iLm1 ekt
Lm1 Cm1 Lm1 Lm1
1 Cp Cp Cp
y1 k ekt ¼ ½ipðiÞ2 1 C4 þ i0p2 1 C4 ekt þ 1 w4 ðILm Þ
Cp1 Lm1 D D D k
Cp1 ðiÞ r r 1
w4 ðiLmk ekt Þ Y1 ekt
1 1
þ y1
D Lm1 Lm1 Cm1 Lm1
ðiÞ 1
I Lm iL ekt
1 Cm1 Lm1 m1
1 Cp Cp ðiÞ r1 1 ðiÞ
y1 k ekt ¼ ½iðiÞ 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðILm Þ Y1 I
Cp1 Lm1 p2 D D k Lm1 Cm1 Lm1 Lm1
1 Cp Cp
þ ½i0p2 1 C4 ekt þ 1 w4 ðiLmk ekt Þ
Cp1 Lm1 D D
r1 1
y1 ekt iL ekt
Lm1 Cm1 Lm1 m1
ðiÞ C p1 C p1 ðiÞ
At fixed points: 1
Cp1 Lm1 ½ip2 D C4 þ D w4 ðILm Þ Y1 Lrm1 Cm 1Lm
k 1 1 1
ðiÞ
I Lm ¼ 0
1
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 739
1 Cp Cp r1 1
y1 k þ ½i0 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðiLmk Þ y1 iL
Cp1 Lm1 p2 D D Lm1 Cm1 Lm1 m1
¼0
dY2 r2 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
¼ Y2 þ ðip2 ½ þ þ ½ w þ w Þ
dt Lm2 C1 Lm2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Cp2 1
1 C2 w2 1
½ip2 þ I Lm 2
Cp3 Lm2 D D Cm2 Lm2
ðiÞ r2 1 C1 C2 C1
y2 k ekt ¼ ½Y2 þ y2 ekt þ ð½iðiÞ 0 kt
p2 þ ip2 e ½ þ
Lm2 C 1 L m2 D Cp3 Cp2
C1 1 1
þ ½ ½w2 ðILm Þ þ w2 ðiLmk ekt Þ þ fw1 ðILm Þ þ w1 ðiLmk ekt ÞgÞ
D Cp3 k Cp2 k
kt
1 C2 ½w2 ðILmk Þ þ w2 ðiLmk e Þ
½ðiðiÞ þ i 0
ekt
Þ þ
Cp3 Lm2 p2 p2
D D
1 ðiÞ
½I þ iLm2 ekt
Cm2 Lm2 Lm2
ðiÞr2 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1
y2 k ekt ¼ Y2 þ ðiðiÞ ½ þ þ ½ w ðI Þ
Lm2 C1 Lm2 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Lmk
1 1 C2 w2 ðILmk Þ 1 ðiÞ r2
þ w1 ðILm ÞÞ ½iðiÞ þ I y2 ekt
Cp2 k Cp3 Lm2 p 2
D D Cm2 Lm2 Lm2 Lm2
1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
þ ði0 ekt ½ þ þ ½ w ðiL ekt Þ þ w ðiL ekt ÞÞ
C1 Lm2 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 mk Cp2 1 mk
1 C2 w2 ðiLmk ekt Þ 1
½i0p2 ekt þ iL ekt
Cp3 Lm2 D D C m 2 L m 2 m2
At fixed points:
r2
ðiÞ 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1
Y2 þ ðipðiÞ2 ½ þ þ ½ w ðI Þ
Lm2 C1 Lm2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Lmk
w2 ðILm Þ
1 1 ðiÞ C2 1 ðiÞ
þ w ðI ÞÞ ½i þ k
I ¼0
Cp2 1 Lmk Cp3 Lm2 p2 D D Cm2 Lm2 Lm2
r2 1 C1 C2 C1 C1
y2 k ekt ¼ y2 ekt þ ði0 ekt ½ þ þ
Lm2 C1 Lm2 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D
1 1 1
½ w ðiL ekt Þ þ w ðiL ekt ÞÞ
Cp3 2 mk Cp2 1 mk Cp3 Lm2
kt
C2 w2 ðiLmk e Þ 1
½i0p2 ekt þ iL ekt
D D Cm2 Lm2 m2
740 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
kt kt
w1 ðiLmk e Þ ¼ e w1 ðiLmk Þ; w2 ðiLmk e Þ ¼ ekt w2 ðiLmk Þ
kt
r2 1 C1 1 1 1
y2 k y2 þ i0p2 þ ½ w2 ðiLmk Þ þ w ðiL Þ
Lm2 D Lm2 Cp2 Lm2 D Cp3 Cp2 1 mk
1 w2 ðiLmk Þ 1
iL ¼ 0
Cp3 Lm2 D Cm2 Lm2 m2
dY3 1 C2 w2 r3 1
¼ ½ip2 þ Y3 ILm3
dt Cp3 Lm3 D D Lm3 Cm3 Lm3
kt
1 C2 ½w2 ðILmk Þ þ w2 ðiLmk e Þ
y3 k ekt ¼ ½ðipðiÞ2 þ i0p2 ekt Þ þ
Cp3 Lm3 D D
ðiÞ r3 1 ðiÞ
ðY3 þ y3 ekt Þ ðILm þ iLm3 ekt Þ
Lm3 Cm3 Lm3 3
w2 ðILm Þ
kt 1 ðiÞ C2 ðiÞ r3 1 ðiÞ
y3 k e ¼ ½i þ k
Y3 I
Cp3 Lm3 p2 D D Lm3 Cm3 Lm3 Lm3
kt
1 C2 w2 ðiLmk e Þ r3
þ ½i0p2 ekt þ y3 ekt
Cp3 Lm3 D D Lm3
1
iL ekt
Cm3 Lm3 m3
1 C2 w2 ðiLmk Þ r3 1
y3 k þ ½i0p2 þ y3 iL ¼ 0
Cp3 Lm3 D D Lm3 Cm3 Lm3 m3
dY4 r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
¼ Y4 þ ðip2 ½ þ þ ½ w þ w Þ
dt Lm4 C1 Lm4 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Cp2 1
1 Cp Cp 1
½ip2 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ILm4
Cp1 Lm4 D D Cm4 Lm4
ðiÞ r4 1 C1 C2 C1
y4 k ekt ¼ ðY4 þ y4 ekt Þ þ ð½ipðiÞ2 þ i0p2 ekt ½ þ
Lm4 C1 Lm4 D C p3 Cp2
C1 1 1
þ ½ ½w2 ðILm Þ þ w2 ðiLmk ekt Þ þ fw1 ðILm Þ þ w1 ðiLmk ekt ÞgÞ
D Cp3 k Cp2 k
1 C C
½ðipðiÞ2 þ i0p2 ekt Þ 1 C4 þ 1 fw4 ðILm Þ þ w4 ðiLmk ekt Þg
p p
Cp1 Lm4 D D k
1 ðiÞ
ðILm þ iLm4 ekt Þ
Cm4 Lm4 4
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 741
ðiÞ r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
y4 k ekt ¼ Y4 þ ðiðiÞ ½ þ þ ½ w ðI Þ þ w ðI ÞÞ
Lm4 C1 Lm4 p2 D Cp3 Cp 2 D Cp 3 2 L m k Cp2 1 Lmk
1 Cp Cp 1 ðiÞ r4
½iðiÞ 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðILm Þ I y4 ekt
Cp1 Lm4 p2 D D k Cm4 Lm4 Lm4 Lm4
1 C 1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
þ ði0 ekt ½ þ þ ½ w ðiL ekt Þ þ w ðiL ekt ÞÞ
C1 Lm4 p2 D Cp3 Cp 2 D Cp 3 2 m k Cp 2 1 m k
1 Cp Cp 1
½i0 ekt 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðiLmk ekt Þ iL ekt
Cp1 Lm4 p2 D D Cm 4 L m 4 m 4
At fixed points:
ðiÞ r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
Y4 þ ðipðiÞ2 ½ þ þ ½ w2 ðILm Þ þ w ðI ÞÞ
Lm4 C1 Lm4 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 k Cp2 1 Lmk
1 Cp Cp 1 ðiÞ
½iðiÞ 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðILm Þ I ¼0
Cp1 Lm4 p2 D D k Cm4 Lm4 Lm4
r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1
y4 k ekt ¼ y4 ekt þ ði0 ekt ½ þ þ
Lm4 C1 Lm4 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D
1 1 1
½ w ðiL ekt Þ þ w ðiL ekt ÞÞ
Cp3 2 mk Cp2 1 mk Cp1 Lm4
C C 1
½i0p2 ekt 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðiLmk ekt Þ iL ekt
p p
D D Cm4 Lm4 m4
r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1
y4 k y4 þ ði0 ½ þ þ ½ w ðiL Þ
Lm4 C1 Lm4 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 mk
1 1 Cp Cp 1
þ w1 ðiLmk ÞÞ ½i0p2 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðiLmk Þ iL ¼ 0
Cp2 Cp1 Lm4 D D Cm4 Lm4 m4
ðiÞ ðiÞ
iLm1 k ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt ; Y1 ¼ 0; iLm1 k þ y1 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
iLm2 k ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2 ekt ; Y2 ¼ 0; iLm2 k þ y2 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
iLm3 k ekt ¼ Y3 þ y3 ekt ; Y3 ¼ 0; iLm3 k þ y3 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
iLm4 k ekt ¼ Y4 þ y4 ekt ; Y4 ¼ 0; iLm4 k þ y4 ¼ 0
dis1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1 1 n2 n1 1
¼ ½ip2 ½ þ þ ½ w2 þ w1 12
dt D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 Cp2 C1 Rs n2 n2 Rs
dVs ðtÞ
dt
742 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
C1 C2 C1 C1 1
i0s1 k ekt ¼ fðipðiÞ2 þ i0p2 ekt Þ ½ þ þ ½ fw2 ðILm Þ
D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 k
1 1
þ w2 ðiLmk ekt Þg þ fw1 ðILm Þ þ w1 ðiLmk ekt Þgg
Cp2 k C1 Rs
n21 n1 1 dVs ðtÞ
n22 n2 Rs dt
C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1
i0s1 k ekt ¼ fðipðiÞ2 Þ ½ þ þ ½ w ðI Þ þ w ðI Þg
D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 Lmk Cp2 1 Lmk
1 n2 n1 1 dVs ðtÞ C1 C2 C1
12 f ! eg fi0p2 ekt ½ þ
C1 Rs n2 n2 Rs dt D Cp3 Cp2
C1 1 1 1 n2
þ ½ w2 ðiLmk ekt Þ þ w1 ðiLmk ekt Þg 12
D Cp3 Cp2 C1 Rs n2
ðiÞ
At fixed points: fðip2 Þ CD1 ½CCp2 þ C1
Cp2 þ D
C1
½C1p w2 ðILm Þ þ 1
Cp2 w1 ðILm Þg
3 3 k k
n21
1
C1 Rs n22
¼0
C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1 1 n2
i0s1 k ekt ¼ fi0p2 ekt ½ þ þ ½ w2 ðiLmk ekt Þ þ w1 ðiLmk ekt Þg 12
D C p3 C p2 D C p3 C p2 C1 Rs n2
C1 C 2 C1 C1 1 1 1 n2
i0s1 k fi0p2 ½ þ þ ½ w2 ðiLmk Þ þ w1 ðiLmk Þg 12 ¼ 0
D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 Cp2 C1 R s n 2
dip2 n2 1 C2 C2 C2 1
¼ 42 fip2 ½ C4 þ ½ w w4 g
dt n3 C2 Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 2
n24 1 C2 C2 C2 1
i0p2 k ekt ¼ fðipðiÞ2 þ i0p2 ekt Þ ½ C4 þ ½ fw2 ðILm Þ
n23 C2 Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 k
n24 1 C2 C2 C2 1
i0p2 k ekt ¼ fipðiÞ2 ½ C4 þ ½ w ðI Þ w4 ðILm Þg
n23 C2 Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 2 Lmk k
n24 1 C2 C2 C2 1
fi0p2 ekt ½ C4 þ ½ w ðiL ekt Þ
n23 C2 Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 2 mk
w4 ðiLmk ekt Þg
n2 ðiÞ
At fixed points: n42 C2 R1 load fip2 CD2 ½CCp2 C4 þ C2
D ½C1p w2 ðILm Þ
3 3 3 k
w4 ðILm Þg ¼ 0
k
7.3 A Crystal-Lattice BPF Circuit Stability Analysis 743
n24 1 C2 C2 C2 1
i0p2 k fi0p2 ½ C4 þ ½ w ðiL Þ w4 ðiLmk Þg
n3 C2 Rload
2 D Cp3 D Cp3 2 mk
¼0
We can summery our Lattice crystal filter arbitrarily small increments equations:
1 Cp Cp r1 1
y1 k þ ½i0 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðiLmk Þ y1 iL ¼ 0
Cp1 Lm1 p2 D D Lm1 Cm1 Lm1 m1
r2 1 C1 1 1 1
y2 k y2 þ i0p2 þ ½ w ðiL Þ þ w ðiL Þ
Lm2 D Lm2 Cp2 Lm2 D Cp3 2 mk Cp2 1 mk
1 w2 ðiLmk Þ 1
iL ¼ 0
Cp3 Lm2 D Cm2 Lm2 m2
1 C2 w2 ðiLmk Þ r3 1
y3 k þ ½i0 þ y3 iL ¼ 0
Cp3 Lm3 p2 D D Lm3 Cm3 Lm3 m3
r4 1 C1 C2 C1 C1 1
y4 k y4 þ ði0 ½ þ þ ½ w ðiL Þ
Lm4 C1 Lm4 p2 D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 2 mk
1 1 Cp Cp 1
þ w ðiL ÞÞ ½i0 1 C4 þ 1 w4 ðiLmk Þ iL ¼ 0
Cp2 1 mk Cp1 Lm4 p2 D D Cm4 Lm4 m4
C1 C2 C1 C1 1 1 1 n2
i0s1 k fi0p2 ½ þ þ ½ w2 ðiLmk Þ þ w1 ðiLmk Þg 12 ¼ 0
D Cp3 Cp2 D Cp3 Cp2 C1 Rs n2
n24 1 C2 C2 C2 1
i0p2 k fi0p2 ½ C4 þ ½ w ðiL Þ w4 ðiLmk Þg ¼ 0
n23 C2 Rload D Cp3 D Cp3 2 mk
0 1
y1
B y C
B 2C
B C
B y3 C
B C
B C
0 1 BB y 4 C
N11 . . . N1 10 C
B iLm C
B .. .. B
.. C B C r1
C
1
@ . . . A B iLm C ¼ 0; N11 ¼ k L ; N12 ¼ N13 ¼ N14 ¼ 0
B 2C m1
N10 N10 10 B C
1
B iLm3 C
B C
Bi C
B L m4 C
B C
B i0 C
@ s1 A
i0p2
744 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
Remark Reader exercise to find N15 ; N16 ; N17 ; N18 . N19 ¼ 0; N1 10 ¼ Lm1 D C4
1
r2 1 C1
N21 ¼ 0; N22 ¼ k ; N23 ¼ N24 ¼ 0; N29 ¼ 0; N2 10 ¼
Lm2 D Lm2 Cp2
r3 1 C2
N31 ¼ N32 ¼ 0; N33 ¼ k ; N34 ¼ 0; N39 ¼ 0; N3 10 ¼
Lm3 Cp3 Lm3 D
N63 ¼ N64 ¼ 0; N65 ¼ 0; N66 ¼ k; N67 ¼ . . . ¼ N6 10 ¼ 0; N71 ¼ N72 ¼ 0; N73 ¼ 1; N74 ¼ 0
N75 ¼ N76 ¼ 0; N77 ¼ k; N78 ¼ N79 ¼ N7 10 ¼ 0; N81 ¼ N82 ¼ N83 ¼ 0; N84 ¼ 1
C1 C2 C1 1 n2
N9 10 ¼ ½ þ 12 :
D Cp3 Cp2 C1 Rs n2
n24 1 C2
N10 1 ¼ . . . ¼ N10 4 ¼ 0; N10 9 ¼ 0; N10 10 ¼ k ½ C4 :
n3 Rload D Cp3
2
X
10 X
10
detðA k IÞ ¼ !k kk ; !k kk ¼ 0:
k¼0 k¼0
X
10 X
10
detðA k IÞ ¼ !k kk ; detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 ) !k kk ¼ 0
k¼0 k¼0
voltage gives a big capacitance, and a large reverse bias voltage gives a small
capacitance. The varactor capacitance is changed as a function of the bias voltage.
There are two circuits’ models of varactor diode, high frequency circuit model and
low frequency circuit model. High frequency circuit model: Ls is the lead induc-
tance and Cc is the package inductance. These components of the model only
become significant at very high frequencies. Cj is the junction capacitance which
varies with applied voltage according to equation Cj ðVÞ ¼ ð1 þC0V Þn . V0 is the junc-
V0
tion potential with no bias voltage applied and is usually in the range of 0.5–0.7 v.
It can be determined by measuring the voltage drop across the diode when it is
conducting under forward bias. C0 is the capacitance with zero bias voltage. The
exponent n is dependent on the doping profile: n = 1/3 for a graded junction,
n = 1/2 for an abrupt junction, and n = 1 to n = 2 for hyperabrupt junction. V is the
applied voltage and is positive for reverse bias and negative for forward bias.
The Cj ðVÞ ¼ . . . equation does apply for forward bias voltages but only up to
about V ¼ V20 . It is possible to derive an expression for C0 but in practice the value
of C0 usually has to be determined experimentally. The series resistance, Rs, is due
to the resistance of the semiconductor material of which the diode is made as well
as any lead and contact resistance. The part of the diode which is not part of the
depletion region contributes to this resistance. Rs is a function of the bias voltage.
As reverse bias is increased, the depletion region gets larger and Rs gets smaller and
vice versa. The parallel resistance Rp represents the reverse leakage current. It is in
general varying somewhat with the applied voltage and becoming smaller very
rapidly near the reverse breakdown voltage. The low frequency model for a varactor
is as follow:
The Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) equivalent circuit is present in the below
figure. We consider Vs(t) low frequency RF source. We use varactor low frequency
model in our analysis.
VA2 is the applied voltage to varactor diode D1. VA4 is the applied voltage to
varactor diode D2.
C0 C0
Cj1 ðVA2 Þ ¼ VA2 n ; Cj1 ðVA4 Þ ¼ VA4 n ; ICj 1 þ IRp 1 ¼ IRs 1 ; ICj 2 þ IRp 2 ¼ IRs 2
ð1 þ V0 Þ ð1 þ V0 Þ
X
2
IR2 ¼ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ IR1 ðtankiÞ
i¼1
dVA1 d dIL d 2 IL
ICs ðtank1Þ ¼ Cs ¼ Cs ðL1 1 Þ ¼ Cs L1 2 1 ; VA1
Zdt dt dt dt
1
¼ ICs ðtank1Þ dt
Cs
Z
dðVA1 VA2 Þ 1
ICT ðtank1Þ ¼ CT ) VA1 VA2 ¼ ICT ðtank1Þ dt;
dt CT
Z
1
VA2 ¼ VA1 ICT ðtank1Þ dt
CT
Z
dIL 1 dðVA2 VA3 Þ
VA2 ¼ L1 1 ICT ðtank1Þ dt; ICj1 ¼ Cj1
dt CT dt
Z
1
) VA2 VA3 ¼ ICj1 dt
Cj1
Z Z Z
1 dIL1 1 1
VA3 ¼ VA2 ICj1 dt ¼ L1 ICT ðtank1Þ dt ICj1 dt
Cj1 dt CT Cj1
Z
VA VA3 1
IRp1 ¼ 2 ) VA2 VA3 ¼ IRp1 Rp1 ; IRp1 Rp1 ¼ ICj1 dt
Rp1 Cj1
Z
d 1 dIRp1 1 dIRp1 1
fIR Rp1 ¼ ICj1 dtg ) Rp1 ¼ ICj1 ) ¼ ICj1
dt p1 Cj1 dt Cj1 dt Cj1 Rp1
VA3
IRs1 ¼ ) VA3 ¼ IRs1 Rs1 ; IRs1 Rs1
Rs1 Z Z
dIL 1 1
¼ L1 1 ICT ðtank1Þ dt ICj1 dt
dt CT Cj1
750 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
dIRs1 d 2 IL 1 1 dIRs1 1 1
Rs1 ¼ L 1 2 1 ICT ðtank1Þ ICj1 ; ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ ICT ðtank1Þ
dt dt CT Cj1 dt C s Rs1 C T Rs1
1
ICj1
Cj1 Rs1
Z
dðVA1 VA6 Þ 1
ICc ¼ Cc ) VA 1 VA 6 ¼ ICc dt
dt Cc
Z Z Z
1 1 1
VA6 ¼ VA1 ICc dt ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ dt ICc dt
Cc Cs Cc
Z
dðVA6 VA4 Þ 1
ICT ðtank2Þ ¼ CT ) VA6 VA4 ¼ ICT ðtank2Þ dt;
dt CT
Z
1
VA4 ¼ VA6 ICT ðtank2Þ dt
C
Z T Z
1 1
VA4 ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ dt ICc dt
Cs Cc
Z
1
ICT ðtank2Þ dt
CT
Z
dðVA4 VA5 Þ 1
ICj2 ¼ Cj2 ) VA4 VA5 ¼ ICj2 dt ) VA5
dtZ Cj2
1
¼ VA4 ICj2 dt
Cj2
Z Z Z Z
1 1 1 1
VA5 ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ dt ICc dt ICT ðtank2Þ dt ICj2
Cs Cc CT Cj2
dt
VA4 VA5
IRp2 ¼ ) VA4 VA5 ¼ IRp2 Rp2 ) IRp2 Rp2
Rp2
Z
1 dIRp2 1
¼ ICj2 dt; ¼ ICj2
Cj2 dt Cj2 Rp2
Z
VA5 1
IRs2 ¼ ) VA5 ¼ IRs2 Rs2 ; IRs2 Rs2 ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ dt
Rs2 Cs
Z Z Z
1 1 1
ICc dt ICT ðtank2Þ dt ICj2 dt
Cc CT Cj2
Z Z
d 1 1
fIR Rs2 ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ dt ICc dt
dt s2 Cs Cc
Z Z
1 1
ICT ðtank2Þ dt ICj2 dtg
CT Cj2
dIRs2 1 1 1 1
Rs2 ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ ICc ICT ðtank2Þ ICj2
dt Cs Cc CT Cj2
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 751
Z Z
dVA6 1 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ Cs ) VA6 ¼ ICs ðtank2Þ dt; ICs ðtank2Þ dt
dt Cs Cs
Z Z
1 1
¼ ICs ðtank1Þ dt ICc dt
C C
Z s Z c Z
d 1 1 1
f ICs ðtank2Þ dt ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ dt ICc dtg;
dt Cs Cs Cc
1 1 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ ICc
Cs Cs Cc
dVA6 d dIL d 2 IL
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ Cs ¼ Cs ðL2 2 Þ ¼ Cs L2 2 2 ;
dt dt dt dt
VA6
IRload ¼ ) VA6 ¼ IRload Rload
Rload
1 d 2 IL dIR d 2 IL dIR 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ L2 2 2 ; load Rload ¼ L2 2 2 ; load ¼ ICs ðtank2Þ
Cs dt dt dt dt Cs Rload
VA7 VA2
IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ ) IR1 ðtank1Þ R1 ¼ VA7 VA2 ;
R1
Z
dIL 1
IR1 ðtank1Þ R1 ¼ Vtune IR2 R2 L1 1 þ ICT ðtank1Þ dt
dt CT
Z
d dIL1 1
fIR ðtank1Þ R1 ¼ Vtune IR2 R2 L1 þ ICT ðtank1Þ dtg
dt 1 dt CT
d 2 I L1 1 1 1 1
L1 ICT ðtank1Þ ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ ICc ICT ðtank2Þ
dt2 CT Cs Cc CT
dY1 1
¼ ICs ðtank1Þ
dt Cs L1
dIRs1 1 1 1
¼ ICs ðtank1Þ ICT ðtank1Þ ICj1
dt Cs Rs1 CT Rs1 Cj1 Rs1
dIRp2 1 dIRs2 1
¼ ICj2 ; ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ
dt Cj2 Rp2 dt Cs Rs2
1 1 1
I Cc ICT ðtank2Þ ICj2
Cc Rs2 CT Rs2 Cj2 Rs2
dIL2 Rload dIRload 1
¼ IRload ; ¼ ICs ðtank2Þ
dt L2 dt Cs Rload
1 1 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ ICc ; IRs ¼ IL1 þ ICs ðtank1Þ þ ICT ðtank1Þ þ ICc
Cs Cs Cc
ICc ¼ ICT ðtank2Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ þ IL2 þ IRload ; ICT ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ ICj1 þ IRp1
ICT ðtank2Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ ICj2 þ IRp2 ; ICj1 þ IRp1 ¼ IRs1 ; ICj2 þ IRp2 ¼ IRs2
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 753
X
2
IR2 ¼ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ IR1 ðtankiÞ
i¼1
ICj1 þ IRp1 ¼ IRs1 ) ICj1 ¼ IRs1 IRp1 ; ICj2 þ IRp2 ¼ IRs2 ) ICj2 ¼ IRs2 IRp2
ICT ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ ICj1 þ IRp1 ¼ IRs1 ; ICT ðtank2Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ ICj2 þ IRp2 ¼ IRs2
dIRs1 1 1 1
¼ ICs ðtank1Þ ICT ðtank1Þ ðIRs1 IRp1 Þ;
dt Cs Rs1 CT Rs1 Cj1 Rs1
dIRp2 1
¼ ðIRs2 IRp2 Þ
dt Cj2 Rp2
dIRs2 1 1 1 1
¼ ICs ðtank1Þ I Cc ICT ðtank2Þ
dt Cs Rs2 Cc Rs2 CT Rs2 Cj2 Rs2
ðIRs2 IRp2 Þ
ICT ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs1 ) ICT ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs1 IR1 ðtank1Þ ; ICT ðtank2Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ¼ IRs2
) ICT ðtank2Þ ¼ IRs2 IR1 ðtank2Þ
dIRs1 1 1
¼ ICs ðtank1Þ ðIRs1 IR1 ðtank1Þ Þ
dt Cs Rs1 CT Rs1
1 dIRp2 1
ðIRs1 IRp1 Þ; ¼ ðIRs2 IRp2 Þ
Cj1 Rs1 dt Cj2 Rp2
dIRs2 1 1 1
¼ ICs ðtank1Þ I Cc ðIRs2 IR1 ðtank2Þ Þ
dt Cs Rs2 Cc Rs2 CT Rs2
1
ðIRs2 IRp2 Þ
Cj2 Rs2
754 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
&&&
IRs ¼ IL1 þ ICs ðtank1Þ þ ICT ðtank1Þ þ ICc ; ICc ¼ ICT ðtank2Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ þ IL2 þ IRload ;
1 1 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ ICc
Cs Cs Cc
ICc ¼ IRs IL1 ICs ðtank1Þ ICT ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs IL1 ICs ðtank1Þ IRs1 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ
IRs IL1 ICs ðtank1Þ IRs1 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs2 IR1 ðtank2Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ þ IL2 þ IRload
IRs IL1 IL2 IRs1 IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ IRload ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ
X
2 X
2 X
2
IR s I Lk IRsi þ IR1 ðtankiÞ IRload ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ þ ICs ðtank2Þ
k¼1 i¼1 i¼1
1 1 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ ICs ðtank1Þ ðIRs IL1 ICs ðtank1Þ IRs1 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ Þ
Cs Cs Cc
1 1 1 1
IRs þ I L1 þ IRs1 IR1 ðtank1Þ
Cc Cc Cc Cc
1 1 1
¼ ICs ðtank2Þ ð þ Þ ICs ðtank1Þ
Cs Cs Cc
X
2 X
2 X
2
ICs ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs I Lk IRsi þ IR1 ðtankiÞ IRload ICs ðtank2Þ
k¼1 i¼1 i¼1
1 1 1 1 1
IRs þ IL þ IRs1 IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ ICs ðtank2Þ
Cc Cc 1 Cc Cc Cs
1 1 X 2 X2 X2
ð þ Þ ½IRs I Lk IRsi þ IR1 ðtankiÞ IRload ICs ðtank2Þ
Cs Cc k¼1 i¼1 i¼1
1 1 1 1 1
IRs þ I L1 þ IRs1 IR1 ðtank1Þ ¼ ICs ðtank2Þ
Cc Cc Cc Cc Cs
1 1 1 1 X 2
1 1 X 2
1 1
ð þ Þ IRs þ ð þ Þ ILk þ ð þ Þ IR ð þ Þ
Cs Cc Cs Cc k¼1 Cs Cc i¼1 si Cs Cc
X
2
1 1 1 1
IR1 ðtankiÞ þ ð þ Þ IRload þ ð þ Þ ICs ðtank2Þ
i¼1
Cs Cc Cs Cc
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 755
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ð þ Þ ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ IRs þ IL þ IRs1 IR1 ðtank1Þ þ ð þ Þ
Cs Cc Cc Cc 1 Cc Cc Cs Cc
X2
1 1 1 1 X 2
IR1 ðtankiÞ þ ð þ Þ IRs ð þ Þ IL
i¼1
Cs Cc Cs Cc k¼1 k
1 1 X 2
1 1
ð þ Þ IRsi ð þ Þ IRload
Cs Cc i¼1 Cs Cc
2 1 1 1 1 1
ð þ Þ ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ð þ Þ
Cs Cc Cs Cs Cs Cc
1 1 1 1 1 1
IL1 ð þ Þ IL2 IRs1 ð þ Þ
Cs Cs Cc Cs Cs Cc
1 1
IRs2 ð þ Þ IRload
Cs Cc
1 1 ðC1s þ Cc Þ
1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
Cs ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
Cs ðC2s þ C1c Þ
1 ðC1s þ Cc Þ
1
1 ð1 þ Cc Þ
1
I L1 I L2 IRs1 C2s
Cs ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
Cs ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
ð Cs þ Cc Þ
1
ðC1s þ C1c Þ
IRs2 IRload
ðC2s þ C1c Þ
1 1 ðCc þ Cs Þ
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
ð2 þ Cc Þ
Cs
ð2 þ Cc Þ
Cs ð2 Cc þ Cs Þ
1 ðCc þ Cs Þ 1
IL1 IL IR
ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 Cc þ Cs Þ 2 ð2 þ CCs Þ s1
c
ðCc þ Cs Þ ðCc þ Cs Þ
I R s2 IR
ð2 Cc þ Cs Þ ð2 Cc þ Cs Þ load
756 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
ðC1s þ Cc Þ
1
ðC1s þ Cc Þ
1
Cs Cc ðCc þ Cs Þ
C1 ¼ C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ ¼ ¼ ¼
ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1
ðC2s þ Cc Þ
1 Cs Cc ð2 Cc þ Cs Þ
1 1 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ I L1
ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1
C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ IL2 IRs1 C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ IRs2 C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ IRload
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1 1
ICs ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs þ ½ 1 IL1 þ ½C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ 1 IL2 þ ½ 1 IRs1
ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1
þ ½C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ 1 IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ½1 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1
½1 C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ þ ½C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ 1 IRload IRs
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1 1
C2 ¼ C2 ðCs ; Cc Þ ¼ 1 Cs ; C2 ¼ C2 ðCs ; Cc Þ ¼ 1
ð2 þ Cc Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
C3 ¼ C3 ðCc ; Cs Þ ¼ 1 C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ; C3 ¼ C3 ðCc ; Cs Þ ¼ C1 ðCc ; Cs Þ 1
ICs ðtank1Þ ¼ IRs C2 IL1 C3 IL2 C2 IRs1 C3 IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
1
C3 C3 IRload IRs
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1 1 1
ICs ðtank2Þ ¼ IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ C1 I L1
ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1
C1 IL2 IRs1 C1 IRs2 C1 IRload
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
dIL1 dY1 1
¼ Y1 ; ¼ fIRs C2 IL1 C3 IL2 C2 IRs1 C3 IRs2
dt dt Cs L1
1
þ IR1 ðtank1Þ C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ C3 C3 IRload IRs g;
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
dIRp1 1
¼ ðIRs1 IRp1 Þ
dt Cj1 Rp1
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 757
dIRs1 1
¼ ðIRs C2 IL1 C3 IL2 C2 IRs1 C3 IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ C2
dt Cs Rs1
1 1
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ C3 C3 IRload IR s Þ ðIRs1 IR1 ðtank1Þ Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ C T Rs1
1 dIRp2 1
ðIRs1 IRp1 Þ; ¼ ðIRs2 IRp2 Þ
Cj1 Rs1 dt Cj2 Rp2
dIRs2 1
¼ ðIRs C2 IL1 C3 IL2 C2 IRs1 C3 IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
dt Cs Rs2
1 1 1
C3 C3 IRload Cs IRs Þ C R ICc C R ðIRs2 IR1 ðtank2Þ Þ
ð2 þ Cc Þ c s2 T s2
1
ðIRs2 IRp2 Þ
Cj2 Rs2
1 1
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ C1 Cs IL1 C1 IL2
ð2 þ Cc Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
IRs1 C1 IRs2 C1 IRload g
ICc ¼ IRs IL1 IRs þ C2 IL1 þ C3 IL2 þ C2 IRs 1 þ C3 IRs 2 IR1 ðtank1Þ C2
1
IR1 ðtank2Þ C3 þ C3 IRload þ IRs IRs 1 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
1
ICc ¼ ½1 þ IRs þ ½C2 1 IL1 IRs þ C3 IL2 þ ½C2 1 IRs 1 þ C3 IRs 2
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
IR1 ðtank2Þ C3 þ C3 IRload þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ½1 C2
dIL1 dY1 1
¼ Y1 ; ¼ fIRs C2 IL1 C3 IL2 C2 IRs1 C3 IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ C2
dt dt Cs L1
1 dIRp1 1
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ C3 C3 IRload IRs g; ¼ ðIRs1 IRp1 Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ dt Cj1 Rp1
758 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
dIRs1 1
¼ ðIRs C2 IL1 C3 IL2 C2 IRs1 C3 IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ
dt Cs Rs1
1 1 1
C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ C3 C3 IRload IRs Þ ðIRs1 IR1 ðtank1Þ Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ CT Rs1 Cj1 Rs1
dIRp2 1
ðIRs1 IRp1 Þ; ¼ ðIRs2 IRp2 Þ
dt Cj2 Rp2
dIRs2 1
¼ ðIRs C2 IL1 C3 IL2 C2 IRs1 C3 IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ
dt Cs Rs2
1 1 1
C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ C3 C3 IRload IRs Þ f½1 þ IRs
ð2 þ Cc Þ
Cs C c R s2 ð2 þ CCcs Þ
þ ½C2 1 IL1 IRs þ C3 IL2 þ ½C2 1 IRs1 þ C3 IRs2
1
IR1 ðtank2Þ C3 þ C3 IRload þ IR1 ðtank1Þ ½1 C2 g ðIRs2 IR1 ðtank2Þ Þ
CT Rs2
1
ðIRs2 IRp2 Þ
Cj2 Rs2
1 1
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ C1 IL1 C1 IL2 IRs1 C1 IRs2 C1 IRload g
ð2 þ CCcs Þ ð2 þ CCcs Þ
dY1 1 1 1 1
¼ IR s C2 IL1 C 3 I L2 C2
dt Cs L1 Cs L1 Cs L1 Cs L1
1 1 1
IRs1 C3 IRs2 þ IR1 ðtank1Þ C2 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
Cs L1 Cs L1 Cs L1
1 1 1
C3 C3 IRload IR
Cs L1 Cs L1 ð2 þ CCs Þ s
c
dIRp1 1 1 dIL
¼ IRs1 IRp1 ; 1 ¼ Y1
dt Cj1 Rp1 Cj1 Rp1 dt
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 759
dIRs1 1 1 1 1
¼ ½1 IRs C 2 I L1 C3 IL2
dt ð2 þ C Þ Cs Rs1
C s
c
Cs Rs1 Cs Rs1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
½ C2 þ þ I R s1 C3 IRs2 þ ½ C2 þ
Cs CT Cj1 Rs1 Cs Rs1 Cs CT
1
IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
Rs1
1 1 1
C3 C3 IRload þ I R p1
Cs Rs1 Cs Rs1 Cj1 Rs1
dIRp2 1 1
¼ IRs2 IRp2
dt Cj2 Rp2 Cj2 Rp2
dIRs2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
¼f ½1 þ Cs þ C g R IRs
dt Cs Cs ð2 þ CCs Þ Cc ð2 þ Cc Þ c s2
c
1 1 1 1 1 1
ð C2 þ ½C2 1Þ IL1 ð þ Þ C3 IL2
Cs Cc Rs2 Cs Cc Rs2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ð C2 þ ½C2 1Þ IRs1 ð C3 þ C3 þ þ Þ
Cs Cc Rs2 Cs Cc Cj2 CT
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
IRs2 þ ð C2 ½1 C2 Þ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ ð C3 þ þ C3 Þ
Rs2 Cs Cc Rs2 Cc CT Cs
1 1 1 1 1
IR1 ðtank2Þ ð þ Þ C3 IRload þ IRp2
Rs2 Cc Cs Rs2 Cj2 Rs2
1 1 1 1
þ IR1 ðtank2Þ C1 IL C1 IL2
Cs Rload Cs Rload ð2 þ CCs Þ 1 Cs Rload
c
1 1 1 1
IRs1 C1 IRs2 C1 IRload
Cs Rload ð2 þ C Þ
C s Cs Rload Cs Rload
c
1 1 1 1 1
X1 ¼ ; X2 ¼ ; X3 ¼ ½1 ; X4 ¼ C2 ;
Cs L1 Cj1 Rp1 ð2 þ CCs Þ Cs Rs1 Cs Rs1
c
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
X5 ¼ C3 ; X6 ¼ ½ C2 þ þ ; X7 ¼ ½ C2 þ ;
Cs Rs1 Cs CT Cj1 Rs1 Cs CT Rs1
1
X8 ¼
Cj1 Rs1
760 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
X9 ¼ ; X10 ¼ f ½1 þ þ g
Cj2 Rp2 Cs Cs ð2 þ CCs Þ Cc ð2 þ Cs
Cc Þ C c R s2
c
1 1 1 1 1 1
X11 ¼ ð C2 þ ½C2 1Þ ; X12 ¼ ð þ Þ C3
Cs Cc Rs2 Cs Cc Rs2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
X13 ¼ ð C3 þ C3 þ þ Þ ; X14 ¼ ð C3 þ þ C3 Þ
Cs Cc Cj2 CT Rs2 Cc CT Cs R s2
1 1 1 1
X15 ¼ ; X16 ¼ ; X17 ¼ C1
Cj2 Rs2 Cs Rload ð2 þ CCs Þ Cs Rload
c
dY1
¼ X1 IRs X1 C2 IL1 X1 C3 IL2 X1 C2 IRs1 X1 C3 IRs2
dt
1
þ X1 IR1 ðtank1Þ C2 þ X1 IR1 ðtank2Þ C3 X1 C3 IRload X1 IRs
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
dIRs1
¼ X3 IRs X4 IL1 X5 IL2 X6 IRs1 X5 IRs2 þ X7
dt
IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ X5 X5 IRload þ X8 IRp1
dIRs2
¼ X10 IRs X11 IL1 X12 IL2 X11 IRs1 X13 IRs2 þ X11 IR1 ðtank1Þ
dt
þ X14 IR1 ðtank2Þ X12 IRload þ X15 IRp2
dIRload
¼ X16 IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ X16 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ X17 X16 IL1 X17 IL2
dt
X16 IRs1 X17 IRs2 X17 IRload
dIRs2 dIR
¼ 0; load ¼ 0
dt dt
IRp ¼ IRs ; Y1 ¼ 0;IRp ¼ IRs ; IRload ¼ 0
1 1 2 2
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 761
1
½1 X1 IRs X1 C2 IL1 X1 C3 IL2 X1 C2 IRs X1 C3 IRs
ð2 þ CCcs Þ 1 2
X3 IRs X4 IL1 X5 IL2 þ ½X8 X6 IRs X5 IRs þ X7 IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ
1 2
X5 ¼ 0
X10 IRs X11 IL1 X12 IL2 X11 IRs þ ½X15 X13 IRs þ X11
1 2
IR1 ðtank1Þ þ X14 IR1 ðtank2Þ
¼0
X16 IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ X16 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ X17 X16 IL1 X17 IL2 X16 IRs X17
1
IRs
2
¼0
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of Tunable BPF (varactor diodes) circuit consists in adding to its
coordinated [Y1 IRp1 IL1 IRs1 IRp2 IRs2 IL2 IRload IRs IR1 ðtank1Þ IR1 ðtank2Þ ] arbitrarily small
increments of exponential terms ½y1 iRp1 iL1 iRs1 iRp2 iRs2 iL2 iRload iRs iR1 ðtank1Þ
iR1 ðtank2Þ ekt , and retaining the first order terms in y1 iRp1 iL1 iRs1 iRp2 iRs2 iL2 iRload
iRs iR1 ðtank1Þ iR1 ðtank2Þ . The system of eight homogeneous equations leads to a
polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalue k. The polynomial charac-
teristic equation accepts by set the tunable BPF (varactor diodes) circuit equations.
The tunable BPF (varactor diodes) circuit fixed values with arbitrarily small incre-
ments of exponential form ½y1 iRp1 iL1 iRs1 iRp2 iRs2 iL2 iRload iRs iR1 ðtank1Þ iR1 ðtank2Þ ekt
are; i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt ; IRp1 ðtÞ ¼ IRp þ iRp1 ekt ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL þ iL1 ekt ; IRs1 ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs1 ekt
1 1 1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
IRp2 ðtÞ ¼ IRp þ iRp2 ekt ; IRs2 ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs2 ekt ; IL2 ðtÞ ¼ IL þ iL2 ekt ; IRload ðtÞ ¼ IRload þ iRload ekt
2 2 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
IRs ðtÞ ¼ IRs þ iRs ekt ; IR1 ðtank1Þ ðtÞ ¼ IR1 ðtank1Þ þ iR1 ðtank1Þ ekt ; IR1 ðtank2Þ ðtÞ ¼ IR1 ðtank2Þ þ iR1 ðtank2Þ ekt
For k < 0, t > 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise k > 0, t > 0 unstable.
Our BPF (varactor diodes) circuit tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for
k < 0, t > 0 otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. k is the
eigenvalue parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or unstable,
additionally his absolute value |k| establish the speed of flow toward or away from
the selected fixed point [2–4].
dY1
¼ X1 IRs X1 C2 IL1 X1 C3 IL2 X1 C2 IRs1 X1 C3 IRs2
dt
1
þ X1 IR1 ðtank1Þ C2 þ X1 IR1 ðtank2Þ C3 X1 C3 IRload X1 IRs
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
y1 k ekt ¼ X1 ðIRs þ iRs ekt Þ X1 C2 ðIL þ iL1 ekt Þ X1 C3
1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
ðIL þ iL2 ekt Þ X1 C2 ðIRs þ iRs1 ekt Þ X1 C3 ðIRs þ iRs2 ekt Þ
2 1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ X1 C2 ðIR1 ðtank1Þ þ iR1 ðtank1Þ ekt Þ þ X1 C3 ðIR1 ðtank2Þ þ iR1 ðtank2Þ ekt Þ
ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
X1 C3 ðIRload þ iRload ekt Þ X1 ðIRs þ iRs ekt Þ
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
At fixed points:
dIRp1
¼ X2 IRs1 X2 IRp1 ; iRp1 k ekt
dt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ X2 ðIRs þ iRs1 ekt Þ X2 ðIRp þ iRp1 ekt Þ
1 1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
iRp1 k ekt ¼ X2 IRs X2 IRp þ X2 iRs1 ekt X2 iRp1 ekt
1 1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed points: X2 IRs X2 IRp ¼ 0 then iRp1 k þ X2 iRs1 X2 iRp1 ¼ 0
1 1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
iRp2 k ekt ¼ X9 IRs X9 IRp þ X9 iRs2 ekt X9 iRp2 ekt
2 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed points: X9 IRs X9 IRp ¼ 0 then iRp2 k þ X9 iRs2 X9 iRp2 ¼ 0
2 2
dIRs1
¼ X3 IRs X4 IL1 X5 IL2 X6 IRs1 X5 IRs2 þ X7
dt
IR1 ðtank1Þ þ IR1 ðtank2Þ X5 X5 IRload þ X8 IRp1
At fixed points:
dIRs2
¼ X10 IRs X11 IL1 X12 IL2 X11 IRs1 X13 IRs2 þ X11 IR1 ðtank1Þ
dt
þ X14 IR1 ðtank2Þ X12 IRload þ X15 IRp2
X11 iL1 ekt X12 iL2 ekt X11 iRs1 ekt X13 iRs2 ekt
þ X11 iR1 ðtank1Þ ekt þ X14 iR1 ðtank2Þ ekt X12 iRload ekt þ X15 iRp2 ekt
At fixed points:
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X10 IRs X11 IL X12 IL X11 IRs X13 IRs þ X11 IR1 ðtank1Þ þ X14 IR1 ðtank2Þ
1 2 1 2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X12 IRload þ X15 IRp ¼ 0
2
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 765
iRs2 k þ X10 iRs X11 iL1 X12 iL2 X11 iRs1 X13 iRs2 þ X11 iR1 ðtank1Þ
þ X14 iR1 ðtank2Þ X12 iRload þ X15 iRp2 ¼ 0
dIRload
¼ X16 IRs þ IR1 ðtank1Þ X16 þ IR1 ðtank2Þ X17 X16 IL1 X17 IL2
dt
X16 IRs1 X17 IRs2 X17 IRload
ðiÞ ðiÞ
iRload k ekt ¼ X16 ðIRs þ iRs ekt Þ þ ðIR1 ðtank1Þ þ iR1 ðtank1Þ ekt Þ X16
ðiÞ ðiÞ
þ ðIR1 ðtank2Þ þ iR1 ðtank2Þ ekt Þ X17 X16 ðIL þ iL1 ekt Þ
1
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
X17 ðIL þ iL2 ekt Þ X16 ðIRs þ iRs1 ekt Þ X17 ðIRs þ iRs2
2 1 2
ðiÞ
ekt Þ X17 ðIRload þ iRload ekt Þ
X16 þ iR1 ðtank2Þ ekt X17 X16 iL1 ekt X17 iL2 ekt X16 iRs1
ekt X17 iRs2 ekt X17 iRload ekt
At fixed points:
iRload k þ X16 iRs þ iR1 ðtank1Þ X16 þ iR1 ðtank2Þ X17 X16 iL1 X17 iL2 X16
iRs1 X17 iRs2 X17 iRload
¼0
We can summery our BPF (varactor diodes) circuit arbitrarily small increments
equations:
iRs2 k X13 iRs2 þ X10 iRs X11 iL1 X12 iL2 X11 iRs1 þ X11 iR1 ðtank1Þ þ X14 iR1 ðtank2Þ
X12 iRload þ X15 iRp2 ¼ 0
Rload
iL2 k þ iRload ¼0
L2
iRload k X17 iRload þ X16 iRs þ iR1 ðtank1Þ X16 þ iR1 ðtank2Þ X17 X16 iL1 X17
iL2 X16 iRs1 X17 iRs2
¼0
0 1
y1
B C
B iRp1 C
B C
B iL1 C
0 1 B C 0 1 0 1
N11 ... N18 B C i11 ... i13 iRs
B iRs1 C
B .. .. .. C B C B .. .. .. C B i C
@ . . . A B Cþ@ . . . A @ R1 ðtank1Þ A ¼ 0; N11
B iRp2 C
N81 N88 B C i81 i83 iR1 ðtank2Þ
B C
B iRs2 C
B C
B iL2 C
@ A
iRload
¼ k; N12 ¼ 0; N13 ¼ X1 C2
N14 ¼ X1 C2 ; N15 ¼ 0; N16 ¼ X1 C3 ; N17 ¼ X1 C3 ; N18 ¼ X1 C3 ; N21 ¼ 0
N45 ¼ 0; N46 ¼ X5 ; N47 ¼ X5 ; N48 ¼ X5 ; N51 ¼ N52 ¼ N53 ¼ N54 ¼ 0; N55
¼ k X9
N56 ¼ X9 ; N57 ¼ N58 ¼ 0; N61 ¼ 0; N62 ¼ 0; N63 ¼ X11 ; N64 ¼ X11 ; N65 ¼ X15
N66 ¼ k X13 ; N67 ¼ X12 ; N68 ¼ X12 ; N71 ¼ . . . ¼ N76 ¼ 0; N77 ¼ k; N78
Rload
¼
L2
7.4 A Tunable BPF Employing Varactor Diodes Stability Analysis 767
N81 ¼ N82 ¼ 0; N83 ¼ X16 ; N84 ¼ X16 ; N85 ¼ 0; N86 ¼ X17 ; N87 ¼ X17 ; N88
¼ k X17
1
i11 ¼ X1 ½1 ; i12 ¼ X1 C2 ; i13 ¼ X1 C3 ; i21 ¼ i22 ¼ i23 ¼ 0; i31
ð2 þ CCcs Þ
¼ i32 ¼ i33 ¼0
i41 ¼ X3 ; i42 ¼ X7 ; i43 ¼ X5 ; i51 ¼ i52 ¼ i53 ¼ 0; i61 ¼ X10 ; i62 ¼ X11 ; i63 ¼ X14
0 1 0 1
i11 ... i13 iRs
B .. .. .. C B i C
Assumption @ . . . A @ R1 ðtank1Þ A ! e
i81 i83 iR1 ðtank2Þ
0 1 0 1
N11 . . . N18 N11 . . . N18
B . .. .. C B .. .. .. C
ðA k IÞ ¼ @ .. . . A; detðA k IÞ ¼ det@ . . . A¼0
N81 N88 N81 N88
X
8 X
8
detðA k IÞ ¼ !k kk ; !k kk ¼ 0:
k¼0 k¼0
X
8 X
8
detðA k IÞ ¼ !k kk ; detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 ) ! k kk ¼ 0
k¼0 k¼0
Exercises
1. We have triplexer circuit. It is a four ports device with a common input and three
outputs. A triplexer is a passive device that implements frequency domain
multiplexing. Three ports (e.g., L, I, H) are multiplexed onto a fourth port (e.g.,
S). The signals on L, I, and H occupy disjoint frequency bands. Consequently,
the signals on L, I, and H can coexist on port S without interfering with each
other. The signal on port L (low band) will occupy a single low frequency band,
the signal on port I (intermediate band) will occupy a single intermediate fre-
quency band and the signal on port H will occupy a higher frequency band. In
that situation, the triplexer consists of a low pass filter connecting ports L and S,
and an intermediate pass filter connecting ports I and S, and a high pass filter
connecting ports H and S. The triplexer, being a passive device, is reciprocal;
the device itself doesn’t have a nothing of input or output. The ports of a
diplexer are frequency selective. A triplexer multiplexes three ports onto one
port. A triplexer can be placed at the output of a frequency RF source, where it
functions as an absorptive filter.
Exercises 769
Filter 2 (I) of the triplexer has a BPF that corresponds with the undesired
frequency band, which can pass right through with little attenuation, and is ter-
minated within to 50 X load. These undesired frequencies are blocked from
entering filter 2 (I) by that filter’s stop band. Filters 1(L) and 3(H) BPFs passes all
the desired signals onto load 1 or load 2 through matching networks (1 and 2) with
little attenuation. The undesired signals through the triplexer are absorbed instead of
being reflected as they would be in a typical filter. The design of a triplexer is as
three different frequency filters with non-overlapping bandpass. The matching
network between triplexer circuit unit and loads (Rload1 and Rload2) can be L-type,
Pi-type, and T-type.
Consider in our RF system which diplexer is an integrated unit, micro strip lines
between filter 1(L) and filter 3(H) to the matching networks. The parasitic effects of
micro strip line between filter 2(I) and 50 X resistor are neglected. We represent
these micro strip lines parasitic effects as a delay lines in time. The delays are
related to the current which flows through micro strips lines and are define as
sout1 ðTau-out1 Þ and sout2 ðTau-out2 Þ respectively. We neglect the triplexer input
micro strip line parasitic effects. s [ 0; s 2 R
1:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points (matching network 1:
T type and matching network 2: L type). Assumption: dVdts ðtÞ ! e.
1:2 Discuss stability of our circuit for the following cases: (a) sout1 ¼ s; sout2 ¼ 0(b)
sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ s(c) sout1 ¼ C sout2 ; sout2 ¼ s; C 2 R þ How our circuit
behavior changes for different values of C and s Parameters?
770 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
1:3 How our circuit dynamic is changed if we disconnect inductor L2? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability and sta-
bility switching.
1:4 We choose both circuits’ matching networks Pi type. Assumption: dVdts ðtÞ ! e .
Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability and
stability switching.
1:5 We add additional filter to our triplexer (inductor L4 and capacitor C4 in series)
which terminated by 50 X resistor. Our circuit is Quad-plexer. Write circuit
differential equations and find fixed points (matching networks are L type).
Discuss stability and stability switching.
2. We have a system of two diplexers in series. Diplexer (I): Two band pass filters
are duplexed, one common input, and two outputs. A diplexer (I) is referring to
a duplex high pass and low pass where broad bands transmit and receive is
necessary. It is a three ports device with common input and two outputs. It
implements frequency domain multiplexing two ports (e.g., LI and HI) are
multiplexed onto a third port (e.g., SI). The signal on port LI and HI occupy
disjoint frequency bands. Consequently, the signals on LI and HI can coexist on
port SI without interfering with each other. The signal on port LI will occupy a
single low frequency band and the signal on port HI will occupy a higher
frequency band. Diplexer (II): Two band pass filters are duplexed, one common
input, and two outputs. A diplexer (II) is referring to a duplex high pass and low
pass where broad bands transmit and receive is necessary. It is a three ports
device with common input and two outputs. It implements frequency domain
multiplexing two ports (e.g., LII and HII) are multiplexed onto a third port (e.g.,
SII). The signal on port LII and HII occupy disjoint frequency bands.
Consequently, the signals on LII and HII can coexist on port SII without inter-
fering with each other. The signal on port LII will occupy a single low frequency
band and the signal on port HII will occupy a higher frequency band. There is an
overlap between diplexer (I) port HI frequency band and diplexer (II) port HII
frequency band.
Diplexer (I)
LI HI
f(Hz)
Diplexer (II)
LII HII
f(Hz)
Exercises 771
Filter (II) of diplexer (I)—low band and filter (IV) of diplexer (II)—low band
have a BPFs that correspond with the undesired frequency bands, and are termi-
nated within the 50 X load. These undesired frequencies are blocked from entering
filters II and IV by that filter’s stop band. Diplexers (I) and (II) are connected in
series by micro strip lines and matching networks (I). The output load (Rload) is
connected to diplexer II’s output through matching network (II).
We represent these micro strips parasitic effects as a delay lines in time. The
delays are related to the current which flows through micro strips and are
sin ðTau-inÞ and sout ðTau-outÞ respectively. We choose T type matching network
(I) and L type matching network (II). We neglect in our analysis other circuit micro
strips parasitic effects and consider them as an ideal elements. s [ 0; s 2 R.
772 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
dVs ðtÞ
Assumption dt ! e.
2:2 Discuss stability of our circuit for the following cases: (a) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ 0,
pffiffiffi
(b) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ s2 , (c) sin ¼ s2 ; sout ¼ s s. How our circuit behavior
changes for different values of s parameter? Discuss stability switching for
different values of s parameter.
2:3 We disconnect diplexer (I)’s filter (II). How it influences our circuit behavior?
Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability and
stability switching for the following cases: (a) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ 0,
(b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s.
2:4 We disconnect diplexer (II)’s filter (IV). How it influences our circuit
behavior? Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss
pffiffiffi
stability and stability switching for the following cases: (a) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ 0,
p ffiffi
ffi
(b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s 3 s.
2:5 We disconnect inductor L3. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability and sta-
pffiffiffi
bility switching for the following cases: (a) sin ¼ s s; sout ¼ 0,
pffiffiffi p ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffi
(b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s 3 s.
3. We have a system of two diplexers (I and II), two RF/Microwave sources, and
summation operator. The summation operator is implemented by using ideal op
amps (summing amplifier follows by inverting amplifier).
R
R1 ¼ R2 ¼ Rf1 ; Rfin2 ¼ 1; VC ¼ VA þ VB ; R2 Rs2 ; R2 þ Rs2 R2
Diplexer (I): Two band pass filters are duplexed, one common input, and two
outputs. A diplexer (I) is referring to a duplex high pass and low pass where broad
bands transmit and receive is necessary. It is a three ports device with common
input and two outputs. It implements frequency domain multiplexing two ports
(e.g., LI and HI) are multiplexed onto a third port (e.g., SI). The signal on port LI
and HI occupy disjoint frequency bands. Consequently, the signals on LI and HI
can coexist on port SI without interfering with each other. The signal on port LI will
occupy a single low frequency band and the signal on port HI will occupy a higher
frequency band. Diplexer (II): Two band pass filters are duplexed, one common
input, and two outputs. A diplexer (II) is referring to a duplex high pass and low
pass where broad bands transmit and receive is necessary. It is a three ports device
with common input and two outputs. It implements frequency domain multiplexing
two ports (e.g., LII and HII) are multiplexed onto a third port (e.g., SII). The signal
on port LII and HII occupy disjoint frequency bands. Consequently, the signals on
LII and HII can coexist on port SII without interfering with each other. The signal
on port LII will occupy a single low frequency band and the signal on port HII will
occupy a higher frequency band. There is an overlap between diplexer (I) port HI
frequency band and diplexer (II) port HII frequency band. The output of diplexer
Exercises 773
(I)’s filter (I) is connected to summation operator (port A). RF/Microwave source
Vs2(t) is connected through resistor Rs2 to summation operator (port B). Load
resistor Rload is connected to diplexer (II)’s filter (IV) through T type matching
network.
Filter (II) of diplexer (I)—low band and filter (III) of diplexer (II)—high band
have a BPFs that correspond with the undesired frequency bands, and are termi-
nated within the 50 X load. These undesired frequencies are blocked from entering
filters II and III by that filter’s stop band. Diplexers (I) and (II) are connected to
summation operator by micro strip lines (sin ðTau-inÞ; sout ðTau-outÞ) .Matching
networks (I) is connected to diplexer (II)’s filter (IV) by micro strip line
(sm ðTau-mÞ).
Assumption There is an overlaps between all circuit’s filters frequency bands, the
output signal from diplexer (II)’s filter (IV) is within specific frequency band and
target for our load resistance (Rload).
dV ðtÞ dV ðtÞ
Assumption dt s1
! e; dt s2
! e. All other micro strip lines in our system are
ideal with no parasitic effects in our circuit. s [ 0; s 2 R
How our circuit behavior changes for different values of s parameter? Discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameter.
3:3 We disconnect diplexer (I)’s filter (II). How it influences our circuit behavior?
Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability and
stability switching for the following cases: sm ¼ s (a) sin ¼ s; sout ¼ 0,
(b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s.
3:4 We disconnect diplexer (II)’s filter (III). How it influences our circuit
behavior? Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss
pffiffiffi
stability and stability switching for the following cases: sm ¼ s
pffiffiffi pffiffiffi pffiffiffi
(a) sin ¼ s s; sout ¼ 0, (b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ 4s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s 3 s.
3:5 We disconnect diplexer (I) from summation operator. How it influences our
circuit dynamics? Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
pffiffiffi
Discuss stability and stability switching for the following cases: sm ¼ s s
pffiffiffi pffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
p ffiffiffi
(a) sin ¼ s s; sout ¼ 0, (b) sin ¼ 0; sout ¼ s, (c) sin ¼ sout ¼ s 3 s.
4. We have a system of triple band triplexer filter. The circuit of triple band
triplexer contains capacitors and inductors, RF source Vs(t) and series resistor
Rs, and resistive loads Rload1, Rload2 and Rload3. Three delays lines sout1 ; sout2 and
sout3 represent circuit micro strip lines parasitic effects. In our analysis we
consider full matching between Rload1 and BPF1, Rload2 and BPF2, Rload3 and
BPF3 (no matching networks). We consider all other micro strip lines in our
circuit are an ideal micro strips lines.
Load resistors Rload1 and Rload2 are connected to BPF1 and BPF2 through
inductors bridge (LA ; LB ; LC ; LD ; LA 6¼ LB 6¼ LC 6¼ LD ).
Exercises 775
dVs ðtÞ
Assumption dt ! e.
4:2 Discuss stability of our circuit for the following cases:
pffiffiffi
(a) sout1 ¼ s; sout2 ¼ s; sout3 ¼ 0
pffiffiffi
(b) sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ s2 ; sout3 ¼ s s
p ffiffi
ffi
(c) sout1 ¼ s2 ; sout2 ¼ s; sout3 ¼ s:
How our circuit behavior changes for different values of s parameter? Discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameter.
4:3 We disconnect capacitor C2. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability of our
circuit for the following cases:
P
2
(a) sout1 ¼ s C1 ; sout2 ¼ s2out1 ; sout3 ¼ soutk
k¼1
pffiffiffi P2
(b) sout1 ¼ s2 C2 ; sout2 ¼ s; sout3 ¼ s2outk
k¼1
R
inverting amplifier). R1 ¼ R2 ¼ Rf1 ; Rfin2 ¼ 1; VC ¼ VA þ VB ; R2
Rs2 ; R2 þ Rs2 R2 (see question 3).
5:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points, Assumption:
dVs ðtÞ
dt ! e.
5:2 Discuss stability of our circuit for the following cases:
pffiffiffi pffiffiffi
(a) sout1 ¼ 3 s; sout2 ¼ s; sout3 ¼ 0
p ffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi
(b) sout1 ¼ 0; sout2 ¼ s2 ; sout3 ¼ s2 s
3
p ffiffiffiffi
ffi pffiffiffi
(c) sout1 ¼ s2 ; sout2 ¼ s; sout3 ¼ s s:
3
How our circuit behavior changes for different values of s parameter? Discuss
stability switching for different values of s parameter.
5:3 We disconnect capacitor C5. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability of our
circuit for the following cases:
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi P
2
(a) sout1 ¼ s C1 ; sout2 ¼ 3 s2out1 ; sout3 ¼ C21 soutk
k¼1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffi P
2
(b) sout1 ¼ 3 s2 C2 ; sout2 ¼ s s; sout3 ¼ s2outk
k¼1
5:5 We disconnect Inductors Bridge’s CB, how it influences our circuit dynamics?
Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability of
our circuit for the following cases:
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffi P
2
(a) sout1 ¼ s C1 ; sout2 ¼ s2out1 ; sout3 ¼ Ck soutk
k¼1
p ffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffi P
2
(b) sout1 ¼ s2 C2 ; sout2 ¼ s s; sout3 ¼ Ck s2outk
3
k¼1
6. We have crystal-lattice BPF circuit with two output loads resistances Rload1 and
Rload2. Crystals have series and parallel resonant mode. The crystal lattice filter
contains several crystals within a single circuit. The input employs RF trans-
former (T1) with shunt capacitor (C1). The output employs five terminals
transformer (T2) with shunt capacitor (C2). Each set of crystals XTAL1 plus
XTAL2 and XTAL3 plus XTAL4 are cut to different frequencies. The matched
set of XTAL1 and XTAL2 having a lower resonant frequency than the other
matched set of XTAL3 and XTAL4. Transformer T1: Parameters np1 and ns1 are
the number of turns of coil 1 (primary) and 2 (secondary), respectively.
Transformer T2: Parameter np2 is the number of turns of coil 1 (primary).
Parameters ns2a and ns2b are the number of turns of coil 2 (secondary). In your
analysis use the equivalent circuit of a quartz crystal and use typical crystal
parameters.
6:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Find arbitrarily small
increments equations.
6:2 Find circuit eigenvalues and discuss stability.
778 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
7. We have Half-lattice crystal filter circuit with two crystals and one load Rload.
Crystals have a series and parallel resonant mode. The Half lattice crystal filter
contains two crystals within a single circuit. The input employs RF transformer
(T1) with shunt capacitor (C1). The set of crystals XTAL1 and XTAL2 are cut to
different frequencies. Half-lattice crystal filter offers a flatter in band response.
The two crystals have different resonant frequencies. The response has a small
peak at either side of the center frequency and a small dip in the middle.
Transformer T1: np is the number of turns of coil 1 (primary). Nsa and nsb are
number of turns of coil 2 (secondary) and coil 3 (secondary). In our analysis, we
use the equivalent circuit of a quartz crystal and use typical crystal parameters.
7:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Find arbitrarily small
increments equations.
7:2 Find circuit eigenvalues and discuss stability.
7:3 Capacitor C1 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
7:4 We increase the number of coil 3 turns by C factor (nsb ! nsb C),
C [ 0; C 2 R þ . How it influences our circuit dynamics? Discuss stability
switching for different values of C parameter.
7:5 We short crystal XTAL2. How it influences circuit behavior? Write circuit
differential equation and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
Exercises 779
8. We have Half-lattice crystal filter circuit with two crystals and one load Rload.
Crystals have a series and parallel resonant mode. The Half lattice crystal filter
contains two crystals within a single circuit. The input employs RF trans-
former (T1) with shunt capacitor (C1). The RF transformer (T1)’s secondary is
connected to two capacitors (Ca and Cb). The set of crystals XTAL1 and
XTAL2 are cut to different frequencies. Half-lattice crystal filter offers a flatter
in band response. The two crystals have different resonant frequencies. The
response has a small peak at either side of the center frequency and a small dip
in the middle. Transformer T1: np is the number of turns of coil 1 (primary). ns
is number of turns of coil 2 (secondary). In our analysis, we use the equivalent
circuit of a quartz crystal and use typical crystal parameters.
8:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Find arbitrarily small
increments Eqs.
8:2 Find circuit eigenvalues and discuss stability.
8:3 Capacitor Cb is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
8:4 We increase the number of coil 1 turns by C factor (np ! np C),
C [ 0; C 2 R þ . How it influences our circuit dynamics? Discuss stability
switching for different values of C parameter.
8:5 We short crystal XTAL1. How it influences circuit behavior? Write circuit
differential equation and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
9. We have circuit of a single crystal filter. It employs the very high Q of the
crystal. Its response is asymmetric and it is too narrow for most applications,
having a bandwidth of a hundred Hz or less. In the circuit there is a variable
capacitor (Cx) that is used to compensate for the parasitic capacitance in the
780 7 Filters Systems Stability Analysis
crystal. This capacitor was normally included as a front panel control. The input
employs RF transformer (T1) with shunt capacitor (C1). The RF transformer
(T1)’s secondary is connected to two capacitors (Ca and Cb). Transformer T1: np
is the number of turns of coil 1 (primary). ns is number of turns of coil 2
(secondary). In our analysis, we use the equivalent circuit of a quartz crystal and
use typical crystal parameters. The crystals XTAL1 is cut to different frequency.
9:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Find arbitrarily small
increments equations
9:2 Find circuit eigenvalues and discuss stability.
9:3 Capacitor Ca is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
9:4 We increase the number of coil 1 turns by C factor (np ! np C),
C [ 0; C 2 R þ . How it influences our circuit dynamics? Discuss stability
switching for different values of C parameter.
9:5 We increase the Cx capacitor value by w parameter (Cx ! Cx w),
w [ 0; w 2 R þ . Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of w parameter.
10. We have circuit of top inductively coupled variable BPF. For wideband
applications the top inductively coupled variable band pass filter is the best. The
circuit includes varactor diodes (Cv) and inductors L1, …, L5, bias resistors R1
and R2 isolated the two varactors (Cv) from the effects of each other, and
resistor R3 represents a direct RF short to ground through Vtune. Capacitors C2
and C3 block the DC inserted by Vtune from being shorted by L2 and L4.
Varactor diodes (Cv) supply the variable tuning capacitance. The capacitance of
the series combination of C2 and Cv in series is CC2 2þCCv v . The capacitance of the
series combination of C3 and Cv in series is CC3 3þCCv v . The capacitors C2 and C3
mainly functioning as a DC blocking capacitor, while Cv, the varactor is
Exercises 781
supplying all of the tuning capacitance for the filter tanks. By applying positive
Vtune we allow the varactor to either linearly tune the filter to its maximum and
minimum values or, by supplying Vtune with discrete voltages it filter the
incoming RF/Microwave signal in discrete steps. The circuit load resistance
Rload is connected in our voltage tunable inductor coupled bandpass filter. Input
RF/microwave signal voltage Vs(t) and his series resistance Rs.
Remark A varactor diode is a P-N junction diode that changes its capacitance and
the series resistance as the bias applied to the diode is varied. The property of
capacitance change is utilized to achieve a change in the frequency and/or phase of
our BPF. In your stability and circuit analysis use the simple model of a packaged
varactor diode. For normal operation, a varactor diode is always reverse biased.
Varactor diode is called voltage controlled capacitor.
10:1 Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
10:2 Find arbitrarily small increments equations and discuss stability.
10:3 Resistor R1 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Write
circuit differential equations and find fixed points. Discuss stability.
10:4 We increase the value of L3 inductor by C parameter (L3 ! L3 C),
C [ 0; C 2 R þ . Write circuit differential equations and find fixed points.
Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of C parameter.
10:5 Inductor L4 is disconnected. How it influences our circuit dynamics? Find
circuit differential equations and fixed points. Discuss stability.
Chapter 8
Antennas System Stability Analysis
N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas can be integrated with RFID IC for com-
plete RFID tags. We investigate the system stability optimization under delayed
electromagnetic interference and parasitic effects. An N-turn multilayer circular coil
antenna is constructed from N-turn of circular coil with multilayer. Our system is
constructed from two antenna; each one, N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna.
Antennas are connected in series with micro strip line and to the RFID IC. An
N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas system is influenced by electromagnetic
interference, which effect their stability behavior. Additionally, micro strip line
which connected each antenna in series, has a parasitic effect, a delay in time Dl.
We inspect our system performances under electromagnetic interferences and micro
strip parasitic effects. Generally, N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas system is
good for many RF and microwave applications. The micro strip line feed technique
enhances the bandwidth of the simple micro strip antenna. Every N-turn multilayer
circular coil antenna has a parasitic DC resistance which needs to be calculated.
Index (i) indicates the first N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna (i = 1) or second
N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna (i = 2). We define RFID’s N-turn multilayer
coil antenna parameters, ai—Average radius of the coil in cm, Ni—number of turns,
bi—winding thickness in cm, Si—wire cross section area, mi—radius of the wire
and hi—winding height in cm. Integrating all those parameters gives the equations
for N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna inductance calculation [85].
0:31 ðai Ni Þ2
Lcalci ¼ ðlH):
6 ai þ 9 hi þ 10 bi
The N turn multilayer circular coil antenna length is calculated as follows: li is the
length of one turn li ¼ 2 p ai . lN is the length of N turn
lNi ¼ Ni li ¼ 2 p ai Ni . Assumption: ai bi ; ai þ bi ai (Fig. 8.1).
We consider system’s two N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas are not
identical (a1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi 2 R þ ). The DC resis-
tance of the N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna:
l Ni 2 p ai Ni 2 ai Ni
RDCi ¼ ¼ ¼ :
r i Si r i Si ri m2i
lNi —total length of the wire, ri—conductivity of the wire (S/m), Si—wire cross
section area (p m2i ), mi—radius of the wire. Due to electromagnetic interference
there are differences in time delays with respect to the first (i = 1) and second (i = 2)
N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna voltages and voltages derivatives.
The delayed voltages are V1 ðt s1 Þ and V2 ðt s2 Þ respectively (s1 6¼ s2 ) and
delayed voltages derivatives are dV1 ðtD dt
1 Þ dV2 ðtD2 Þ
; dt respectively. Assumption:
786 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u 2
X
2 X
2 uY dIðt Dl Þ
V C1 ¼ VRDCi þ VLcalci þ 2 K ðt Lcalci Þ þ ðVl ! eÞ
i¼1 i¼1 i¼1
dt
vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u 2
dVR1 dVC1 X 2
dVRDCi X 2
dVLcalci uY d 2 Iðt Dl Þ dVl
¼ ¼ þ þ 2 K ðt Lcalci Þ 2
þð ! eÞ
dt dt i¼1
dt i¼1
dt i¼1
dt dt
Z
dIðtÞ 1
VLcalc1 ¼ Lcalc1 ) IðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 dt;
dt L
Z calc1
6 a1 þ 9 h1 þ 10 b1
IðtÞ ¼ ð Þ VLcalc1 dt
0:31 ða1 N1 Þ2
Z
dIðt Dl Þ 1
VLcalc2 ¼ Lcalc2 ) Iðt Dl Þ ¼ VLcalc2 dt;
dt Lcalc2
Z
6 a2 þ 9 h2 þ 10 b2
Iðt Dl Þ ¼ VLcalc2 dt
0:31 ða2 N2 Þ2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVm Lcalc1 dVLcalc2
Vm ¼ 2 K ð Þ VLcalc2 ; ¼2K ð Þ
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 dt
Z
1 1 X 2 X2
VLcalc1 dt þ ð VRDCi þ VLcalci þ Vm Þ
Lcalc1 R1 i¼1 i¼1
d X 2 X2
þ C1 ð VRDCi þ VLcalci þ Vm Þ ¼ 0
dt i¼1 i¼1
Z
1 1 X 2 X2
VLcalc1 dt þ ð VRDCi þ VLcalci þ Vm Þ
Lcalc1 R1 i¼1 i¼1
X
2
dVR X
2
dVL dVm
þ C1 ð DCi
þ calci
þ Þ¼0
i¼1
dt i¼1
dt dt
Z X2
1 1
VLcalc1 dt þ fIðtÞ Rdc1 þ Iðt Dl Þ Rdc2 þ VLcalci
Lcalc1 R1 i¼1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dIðtÞ dIðt Dl Þ
þ2 K ð Þ VLcalc2 g þ C1 f Rdc1 þ Rdc2
Lcalc2 dt dt
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X2
dVLcalci Lcalc1 dVLcalc2
þ þ 2 K ð Þ g¼0
i¼1
dt Lcalc2 dt
1 1 1 1
VLcalc1 þ f Rdc1 VLcalc1 þ Rdc2 VLcalc2
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X 2
dVLcalci Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVL Rdc1
þ þ2 K ð Þ g þ C1 f calc1
i¼1
dt L calc2 dt dt Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVLcalc2 Rdc2 X2 2
d VLcalci Lcalc1 d VLcalc2 2
þ þ 2
þ2 K ð Þ g¼0
dt Lcalc2 i¼1
dt Lcalc2 dt2
VLcalc1 VL Lcalc2
’ calc2 ) VLcalc2 ¼ VLcalc1
Lcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc1
790 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
1 1 1 1 Lcalc2 X 2
dVLcalci
VLcalc1 þ f Rdc1 VLcalc1 þ Rdc2 VLcalc1 þ
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc1 i¼1
dt
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 dVLcalc1 Lcalc2 dVL Rdc1 dVLcalc1 Rdc2
þ2 K ð Þ g þ C1 f calc1 þ
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc1
r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X 2 2
d VLcalci Lcalc1 Lcalc2 d VLcalc12
þ þ2 K ð Þ g¼0
i¼1
dt2 Lcalc2 Lcalc1 dt2
X
2
d 2 VL d 2 VLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc1 Lcalc2
calci
¼ þ ¼ ð1 þ Þ;
i¼1
dt2 dt 2 dt 2 dt 2 Lcalc1
X
2
dVL dVLcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVLcalc1 Lcalc2
calci
¼ þ ¼ ð1 þ Þ
i¼1
dt dt dt dt Lcalc1
1 1 1 1
VLcalc1 þ f Rdc1 VLcalc1 þ Rdc2 VLcalc1
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVLcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc1 dVLcalc1 Lcalc2
þ ð1 þ Þþ2 K ð Þ g
dt Lcalc1 Lcalc2 dt Lcalc1
dVL Rdc1 dVLcalc1 Rdc2 d 2 VLcalc1 Lcalc2
þ C1 f calc1 þ þ ð1 þ Þ
dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc1 dt2 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 Lcalc2 d 2 VLcalc1
þ2 K ð Þ g¼0
Lcalc2 Lcalc1 dt2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ 1 Lcalc2 1 Lcalc2
½ þ VLcalc1 þ ½ ð1 þ Þþ2 K
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Rdc1 þ Rdc2 dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2
þ C1 ð Þ þ C1 ½1 þ þ2K ¼0
Lcalc1 dt dt2 Lcalc1 Lcalc1
1 1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
g1 ¼ þ ;
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 Lcalc2 1 Lcalc2 Rdc1 þ Rdc2
g2 ¼ ð1 þ Þþ2 K þ C1 ð Þ
R1 Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc2 Lcalc2
g3 ¼ C1 ½1 þ þ2 K ;
Lcalc1 Lcalc1
dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1
g1 VLcalc1 þ g2 þ g3 ¼0
dt dt2
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 791
dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1
g1 VLcalc1 þ g2 þ g3 ¼ 0; g1 ¼ g1 ðRdc1 ; Rdc2 ; Lcalc1 ; R1 Þ
dt dt2
g2 ¼ g2 ðRdc1 ; Rdc2 ; Lcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; R1 ; K; C1 Þ; g3 ¼ g3 ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; C1 ; KÞ
dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1
We define new variables: Y1 ¼ dt ; dYdt1 ¼ dt2
dY1 dY1 g g
g1 VLcalc1 þ g2 Y1 þ g3 ¼ 0; ¼ 1 VLcalc1 2 Y1 ;
dt dt g3 g3
g1 ¼ g1 ðRdc1 ; Rdc2 ; Lcalc1 ; R1 Þ
1 1 1 1
VLcalc1 þ
f Rdc1 VLcalc1 þ Rdc2 VLcalc2
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc2
r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X 2
dVLcalci Lcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVL Rdc1
þ þ2 K ð Þ g þ C1 f calc1
i¼1
dt L calc2 dt dt Lcalc1
r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVLcalc2 Rdc2 X 2
d 2 VLcalci Lcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2
þ þ 2
þ2 K ð Þ g¼0
dt Lcalc2 i¼1
dt Lcalc2 dt2
VLcalc1 VL Lcalc1
’ calc2 ) VLcalc1 ¼ VLcalc2
Lcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2
X
2
d 2 VL d 2 VLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2 Lcalc1
calci
¼ þ ¼ ð þ 1Þ;
i¼1
dt2 dt 2 dt2 dt2 Lcalc2
X
2
dVL dVLcalc1 dVLcalc2 dVLcalc2 Lcalc1
calci
¼ þ ¼ ð þ 1Þ
i¼1
dt dt dt dt Lcalc2
792 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
þ Rdc2
We define the following global parameters: n1 ¼ Lcalc2
1
þ 1
R1 ðRdc1
Lcalc2 Þ
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 Lcalc1 1 Lcalc1 Rdc1 þ Rdc2
n2 ¼ ð þ 1Þ þ 2 K þ C1 ð Þ;
R1 Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 Lcalc1
n3 ¼ C1 ½ þ1þ2 K
Lcalc2 Lcalc2
dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2
n1 VLcalc2 þ n2 dt þ dt2 n3 ¼ 0. We define new variables:
dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2
Y2 ¼ dt ; dYdt2 ¼ dt2
dVLcalc2 d 2 VLcalc2
n1 VLcalc2 þ n2 þ n3 ¼ 0;
dt dt2
dY2 dY2 n n
n1 VLcalc2 þ n2 Y2 þ n3 ¼ 0 ) ¼ 1 VLcalc2 2 Y2
dt dt n3 n3
Summary: We can get our N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas (RFID
system) system.
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 793
dVLcalc1 dY1 g g
¼ Y1 ; ¼ 1 VLcalc1 2 Y1 ;
dt dt g3 g3
dVLcalc2 dY2 n n
¼ Y2 ; ¼ 1 VLcalc2 2 Y2
dt dt n3 n3
0 1
dY1 0 1 0 Y 1
dt
B dVLcalc1 C C11 ... C14 1
B dt C B .. .. .. C B B VLcalc1 C
C g2 g1
B dY2 C ¼ @ . . . A @ Y2 A; C11 ¼ g ; C12 ¼ g ; C13
@ dt A 3 3
dVLcalc2 C41 C44 VLcalc2
dt
¼ 0; C14 ¼ 0
n2 n
C21 ¼ 1; C22 ¼ C23 ¼ C24 ¼ 0; C31 ¼ C32 ¼ 0; C33 ¼ ; C34 ¼ 1 ; C41 ¼ C42 ¼ 0
n3 n3
C43 ¼ 1; C44 ¼ 0
N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas (RFID system) system is composed from
two N-turn thin wire multilayer and circular. Units are all in centimeters (cm),
ai ; hi ; bi 8 i ¼ 1; 2; Ni 2 R þ . Inductors Lcalc1 ; Lcalc2 units are in lH. Due to
electromagnetic interferences there are different in time delays respect to first and
second N-turn thin wire multilayer and circular antennas voltages and voltages
derivatives. Additionally, there is a delay in time Dl for the current that
flows through inductor Lcalc2 and mutual inductance. The delay voltages are
V1 ðt s1 Þ; V2 ðt s2 Þ respectively (s1 6¼ s2 ) and delayed voltages derivatives are
dV1 ðts1 Þ dV2 ðts2 Þ
dt ; dt respectively (D1 6¼ D2 ; s1 0; s2 0; D1 ; D2 2 R þ ).
dV dV
We consider no delay effect on dYdt1 ; Ldt ; dt ; Ldt
calc1 dY2 calc2
. The N-turn multilayer
circular coil antennas system differential equations under electromagnetic inter-
ferences (delay terms) influence only N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas sys-
tem first and second N-turn multilayer circular coil voltages VLcalc1 ðtÞ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ and
voltages derivatives Y1 ðtÞ and Y2 ðtÞ respect to time, there is no influence on
dY1 ðtÞ dVLcalc1 ðtÞ dY2 ðtÞ dVLcalc2 ðtÞ
dt ; dt ; dt ; dt [85].
0 1
dY1 0 1 0 Y ðt D Þ 1
dt
B dVLcalc1 C C11 . . . C14 1 1
B dt C B .. .. .. C B B VLcalc1 ðt s1 Þ C
C
B dY2 C ¼ @ . . . A @ Y2 ðt D2 Þ A
@ dt A
dVLcalc2 C41 C44 VLcalc2 ðt s2 Þ
dt
794 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
1 Lcalc2
g3 6¼ 0 & g2 6¼ 0 ) ð1 þ Þ
R1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 Lcalc2 Rdc1 þ Rdc2
þ2 K þ C1 ð Þ 6¼ 0; C11 6¼ 0
R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc1
1 1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
g3 6¼ 0 & g1 6¼ 0 )C12 6¼ 0; þ 6¼ 0
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1
1 1 Rdc1 þ Rdc2
n3 6¼ 0; n1 6¼ 0 ) þ ð Þ 6¼ 0; C34 6¼ 0
Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 Lcalc1 1 Lcalc1
n3 6¼ 0; n2 6¼ 0 ) ð þ 1Þ þ 2 K
R1 Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2
Rdc1 þ Rdc2
þ C1 ð Þ 6¼ 0; C33 6¼ 0
Lcalc2
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points (fixed points) of N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID
system consists in adding to coordinates [Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 ] arbitrarily small
increments of exponential form ½y1 vLcalc1 y2 vLcalc2 ekt , and retaining the first order
terms in Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 . The system of four homogeneous equations leads to a
polynomial characteristics equation in the eigenvalues k. The polynomial charac-
teristics equations accept by set the below voltages and voltages derivative respect
to the time into N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system equations.
N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system fixed values with arbitrarily
small increments of exponential form ½Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 ekt are: i = 1 (first fixed
point), i = 2 (second fixed point), i = 3 (third fixed point), etc.,
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt ; VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ekt ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2 ekt ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ekt
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 795
We choose the above expressions for our Y1 ðt),VLcalc1 ðt),Y2 ðt),VLcalc2 ðt) as small
displacement ½y1 vLcalc1 y2 vLcalc2 from the system fixed points at time t = 0.
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ; VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y2 þ y2 ; VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2
For t > 0, k < 0 the selected fixed point is stable otherwise t > 0, k > 0 is
unstable. Our system tends to the selected fixed point exponentially for t > 0, k < 0
otherwise go away from the selected fixed point exponentially. Eigenvalue k is the
parameter which establish if the fixed point is stable or unstable, additionally his
absolute value (|k|) establish the speed of flow toward or away from the selected
fixed point. Table 8.1 describes N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID
system variables for different eigenvalue k and t values.
The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for N-turn
multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system voltages and voltages derivatives
respect to time are as follow:
Table 8.1 N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system variables for different eigenvalue
k and time
k<0 k>0
t=0 ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y1 þ y1 Y1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y1 þ y1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y2 þ y2 Y2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ Y2 þ y2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
t>0 Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ejkjt Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ejkjt VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2 ejkjt Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2 ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ejkjt VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ejkjt
t!∞ Y1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ Y1
ðiÞ
Y1 ðt ! 1Þ ’ y1 ejkjt
VLcalc1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ VLcalc1
ðiÞ VLcalc1 ðt ! 1Þ ’ vLcalc1 ejkjt
Y2 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ Y2
ðiÞ Y2 ðt ! 1Þ ’ y2 ejkjt
VLcalc2 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ VLcalc2
ðiÞ VLcalc2 ðt ! 1Þ ’ vLcalc2 ejkjt
796 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
g1 ðiÞ g ðiÞ
) y1 k ekt ¼ ðVLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ekt Þ 2 ðY1 þ y1 ekt Þ
g3 g3
g1 ðiÞ g ðiÞ g g
y1 k ekt ¼ VLcalc1 2 Y1 1 vLcalc1 ekt 2 y1 ekt ;
g3 g3 g3 g3
g1 ðiÞ g2 ðiÞ
VLcalc1 Y1 ¼ 0
g3 g3
g1 g
y1 k vLcalc1 2 y1 ¼ 0;
g3 g3
dVLcalc2 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ Y2 ) vLcalc2 k ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2 ekt ; Y2 ¼ 0
dt
dY2 n n
vLcalc2 k þ y2 ¼ 0; ¼ 1 VLcalc2 2 Y2
dt n3 n3
n ðiÞ n ðiÞ
) y2 k ekt ¼ ðVLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ekt Þ 2 ðY2 þ y2 ekt Þ
1
n3 n3
n1 ðiÞ n ðiÞ n n
y2 k ekt ¼ V 2 Y 1 vLcalc2 ekt 2 y2 ekt ;
n3 Lcalc2 n3 2 n3 n3
n1 ðiÞ n2 ðiÞ
V Y2 ¼ 0
n3 Lcalc2 n3
n1 n
y2 k vLcalc2 2 y2 ¼ 0
n3 n3
We can summary our N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas RFID system
arbitrarily small increments equations:
g2 g
vLcalc1 k þ y1 ¼ 0; y1 k y1 1 vLcalc1 ¼ 0; vLcalc2 k þ y2 ¼ 0;
g3 g3
n2 n
y2 k y2 1 vLcalc2 ¼ 0
n3 n3
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 797
0 1 0 y1 1
!11 . . . !14
B . Bv C
B . .. .. C
C B Lcalc1 C g2 g1
@ . . . AB
@ y2 A
C ¼ 0; !11 ¼ k ; !12 ¼ ;
g3 g3
!41 !44 v Lcalc2
!13 ¼ 0; !14 ¼ 0; !21 ¼ 1
n2
!22 ¼ k; !23 ¼ 0; !24 ¼ 0; !31 ¼ 0; !32 ¼ 0; !33 ¼ k ;
n3
n1
!34 ¼ ; !41 ¼ 0
n3
!42 ¼ 0; !43 ¼ 1; !44 ¼ k
0 1
!11 . . . !14
B . .. .. C X4
AkI ¼B @ .
. . .
C; detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 )
A kk Pk ¼ 0;
k¼0
!41 !44
g n g n g n
P0 ¼ 1 1 ; P1 ¼ 2 1 þ 1 2
g3 n3 g3 n3 g3 n3
n g n g n g
P2 ¼ 1 þ 2 2 þ 1 ; P3 ¼ 2 þ 2 ; P4 ¼ 1
n3 g3 n3 g3 n3 g3
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðt D1 Þ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekðtD1 Þ ; VLcalc1 ðt s1 Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ekðts1 Þ ;
ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y2 ðt D2 Þ ¼ Y2 þ y2 ekðtD2 Þ ; VLcalc2 ðt s2 Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ekðts2 Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
vLcalc1 k ekt ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekðtD1 Þ ; Y1 ¼ 0; vLcalc1 k þ y1 ekD1 ¼ 0
g ðiÞ g ðiÞ
y1 k ekt ¼ 1 ðVLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ekðts1 Þ Þ 2 ðY1 þ y1 ekðtD1 Þ Þ
g3 g3
g ðiÞ g ðiÞ g g
y1 k ekt ¼ 1 VLcalc1 2 Y1 1 vLcalc1 ekðts1 Þ 2 y1 ekðtD1 Þ
g3 g3 g3 g3
g1 ðiÞ g2 ðiÞ g1 ks1 g
VLcalc1 Y1 ¼ 0; y1 k vLcalc1 e 2 y1 ekD1 ¼ 0
g3 g3 g3 g3
dVLcalc2 ðiÞ ðiÞ
¼ Y2 ; vLcalc2 k ekt ¼ Y2 þ y2 ekðtD2 Þ ; Y2 ¼ 0; vLcalc2 k þ y2 ekD2 ¼ 0
dt
n ðiÞ n ðiÞ n
y2 k ekt ¼ 1 ðVLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ekðts2 Þ Þ 2 Y2 2 y2 ekðtD2 Þ
n3 n3 n3
n ðiÞ n ðiÞ n n
y2 k ekt ¼ VLcalc2 Y2 vLcalc2 ekðts2 Þ 2 y2 ekðtD2 Þ
1 2 1
n3 n3 n3 n3
n1 ðiÞ n2 ðiÞ n1 n
VLcalc2 Y2 ¼ 0; y2 k vLcalc2 eks2 2 y2 ekD2 ¼ 0
n3 n3 n3 n3
The small increments Jacobian of our N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas
RFID system is as follow:
g2 kD1 g
½k e y1 1 eks1 vLcalc1 ¼ 0; vLcalc1 k þ y1 ekD1 ¼ 0
g3 g3
n n
½k 2 ekD2 y2 1 eks2 vLcalc2 ¼ 0; vLcalc2 k þ y2 ekD2 ¼ 0
n3 n
0 3 1
0 1 y1
i11 . . . i14 B C
B . . . C B B vLcalc1 C
C g2
B . . . .. C C ¼ 0; i11 ¼ k ekD1 ;
@ . AB B C g3
@ y2 A
i41 i44
vLcalc2
g1 ks1
i12 ¼ e ; i13 ¼ i14 ¼ 0
g3
n2 kD2 n
i21 ¼ ekD1 ; i22 ¼ k; i23 ¼ i24 ¼ 0; i31 ¼ i32 ¼ 0; i33 ¼ k e ; i34 ¼ 1 eks2
n3 n3
i41 ¼ i42 ¼ 0; i43 ¼ ekD2 ; i44 ¼ k
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 799
0 1
i11 . . . i14
B . . C
AkI ¼B @ .. . . ... C
A; det jA k Ij ¼ 0; D ¼ Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ
i41 i44
n n g g
C33 ¼ 2 ; C34 ¼ 1 ; C11 ¼ 2 ; C12 ¼ 1 ; i33 ¼ k þ C33 ekD2 ;
n3 n3 g3 g3
i34 ¼ C34 eks2
i11 ¼ k þ C11 ekD1 ; i12 ¼ C12 eks1
P
2 P
2 P
2
kð si þ Di Þ kðs2 þ Di Þ
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k þ C12 C34 e
4 i¼1 i¼1 þ k ½C11 C34 e i¼1
P2 P
2
kðs1 þ Di Þ k Di
þ C12 C33 e i¼1 þ k2 ½C11 C33 e i¼1 C12 ekðs1 þ D1 Þ C34 ekðD2 þ s2 Þ
kD2 kD1
k ½C33 e
3
þ C11 e
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ kk ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ p1 ðsÞ k þ p2 ðsÞ k2 þ . . .
k¼0
X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ k þ q2 ðsÞ k2 þ . . .
k¼0
800 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
First we analyze the case when there is delay in first (i = 1) RFID’s N-turn
multilayer coil antenna voltage (s1 ¼ s) and there is no delay in second (i = 2)
RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antenna voltage (s2 ¼ s). Additionally there is
no delay in RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antenna voltages derivatives
(D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ 0).
The general characteristic equation Dðk; sÞ is as follow:
X
n¼4
Pn¼4 ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ kk ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ p1 ðsÞ k þ p2 ðsÞ k2 þ p3 ðsÞ k3 þ p4 ðsÞ k4
k¼0
p0 ðsÞ ¼ 0; p1 ðsÞ ¼ C11 C34 ; p2 ðsÞ ¼ C11 C33 C34 ; p3 ðsÞ ¼ ½C33 þ C11 ; p4 ðsÞ ¼ 1
X
m¼2
Qm¼2 ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ q1 ðsÞ k þ q2 ðsÞ k2
k¼0
q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12 C34 ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ C12 C33 ; q2 ðsÞ ¼ C12 . The homogeneous system
for Y1 VLcalc1 Y2 VLcalc2 leads to a characteristic equation for the eigenvalue k having
P P
the form PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ; PðkÞ ¼ 4j¼0 aj k j ; QðkÞ ¼ 2j¼0 cj k j and the
coefficients faj ðqi ; qk Þ; cj ðqi ; qk Þg 2 R depend on qi ; qk but not on s, qi ; qk are any
RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antennas system’s parameters, other parameters keep
as a constant.
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the variation arguments ðqi ; qk Þ will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, and cj. The coefficients aj, and cj are
continuous, and differential functions of their arguments, and direct substitution
shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ (C12 C34 6¼ 0). k = 0 is not a of
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0. Furthermore, PðkÞ; QðkÞ are analytic functions of k, for
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 801
which the following requirements of the analysis [BK] can also be verified in the
present case [4–6]:
(a) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R, then Pði xÞ þ Qði xÞ 6¼ 0.
(b) jQðkÞ
PðkÞ j is bounded for jkj ! 1, Rek 0. No roots bifurcation from 1.
(c) FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 has a finite number of zeros. Indeed, this is a
polynomial in x.
(d) Each positive root xðqi ; qk Þ of FðxÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable
respect to qi ; qk .
We assume that Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðkÞ and Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ Qm ðkÞ cannot have common
imaginary roots. That is for any real number x: Pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0.
jQm ðk ¼ i x; sÞj2 ¼ ðC12 C34 þ C12 x2 Þ2 þ C212 C233 x2 ¼ C212 C234 þ C212 x4
þ 2 C212 C34 x2 þ C212 C233 x2
jQm ðk ¼ i x; sÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 ¼ C212 C234 þ ð2 C34 þ C233 Þ C212 x2 þ C212 x4
FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 ¼ x8 þ f½C33 þ C11 2 2 ðC11 C33 C34 Þg x6
þ ð2 C11 C34 ½C33 þ C11 þ ðC11 C33 C34 Þ2 Þ x4 þ C211 C234 x2 C212 C234
ð2 C34 þ C233 Þ C212 x2 C212 x4
FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 ¼ x8 þ f½C33 þ C11 2 2 ðC11 C33 C34 Þg x6
þ fð2 C11 C34 ½C33 þ C11 þ ðC11 C33 C34 Þ2 Þ C212 g x4
þ fC211 C234 ð2 C34 þ C233 Þ C212 g x2 C212 C234
802 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
P
Hence FðxÞ ¼ 0 implies 4k¼0 N2k x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði x; sÞ ¼ ðC11 C33 C34 Þ x2 þ x4
Hence
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
And
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
P
2 P
2 P
2
kð si þ Di Þ kðs2 þ Di Þ
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k þ C12 C34 e
4 i¼1 i¼1 þ k ½C11 C34 e i¼1
P2 P
2
kðs1 þ Di Þ k Di
þ C12 C33 e i¼1 þ k2 ½C11 C33 e i¼1 C12 ekðs1 þ D1 Þ
C34 ekðD2 þ s2 Þ k3 ½C33 ekD2 þ C11 ekD1
X
n¼4
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k4 k3 ½C33 þ C11 þ k2 C11 C33 ; Pn¼4 ðk; sÞ ¼ pk ðsÞ kk
k¼0
X
n¼4
pk ðsÞ kk ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ p1 ðsÞ k þ p2 ðsÞ k2 þ p3 ðsÞ k3 þ p4 ðsÞ k4
k¼0
804 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
1
Qm¼2 ðk; sÞ ¼ k2 ð C12 C34 s2 C12 C34 Þ þ k ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12
2
C34 sÞ þ C12 C34
X
k¼2
Qm¼2 ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 þ q1 k þ q2 k2 ; q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12 C34
k¼0
1
q2 ðsÞ ¼ C12 C34 s2 C12 C34 ; q1 ðsÞ ¼ C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s
2
1
Pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ x4 x2 ½ C12 C34 s2 C12 C34 þ C11 C33
2
þ C12 C34 þ i fx3 ½C33 þ C11 þ x ðv11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 sÞg 6¼ 0
jPn ðk ¼ i x; sÞj2 ¼ jPði xÞj2 ¼ x8 þ x6 ð½C33 þ C11 2 2 C11 C33 Þ þ x4 C211 C233
1
jQm ðk ¼ i x; sÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 ¼ ðx2 ð C12 C34 s2 C12 C34 Þ þ C12 C34 Þ2
2
þ x2 ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 sÞ2
1
jQm ðk ¼ i x; sÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 ¼ x4 ð C12 C34 s2 C12 C34 Þ2
2
þ x fðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 sÞ2
2
1
2 ð C12 C34 s2 C12 C34 Þ C12 C34 g þ C212 C234
2
We need to find the expression for FðxÞ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2
1
QR ði x; sÞ ¼ x2 ð C12 C34 s2 C12 C34 Þ þ C12 C34 ;
2
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ x ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 sÞ
Hence
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
And
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
ðx4 x2 C11 C33 Þ ½x2 ð12 C12 C34 s2 C12 C34 Þ þ C12 C34
þ x4 ½C33 þ C11 ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼ 4 1
x ð2 C12 C34 s2 C12 C34 Þ2 þ x2 fðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 sÞ2
2 ð12 C12 C34 s2 C12 C34 Þ C12 C34 g þ C212 C234
Those are continuous and differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use
Theorem 1.2 and this approve the Theorem 1.3.
The third case we analyze is when there is a delay in first (i = 1) and second (i = 2)
RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antennas voltages and antennas voltages derivatives
(s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD ). The general characteristic equation Dðk; sD Þ is as
follow:
P
2 P
2 P
2
kð si þ Di Þ kðs2 þ Di Þ
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k þ C12 C34 e
4 i¼1 i¼1 þ k ½C11 C34 e i¼1
P2 P
2
kðs1 þ Di Þ k Di
þ C12 C33 e i¼1 þ k2 ½C11 C33 e i¼1 C12 ekðs1 þ D1 Þ
C34 ekðD2 þ s2 Þ
k3 ½C33 ekD2 þ C11 ekD1
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 807
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD Þ
¼ k4 þ C12 C34 ek4sD þ k ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 ek3sD
þ k2 ½C11 C33 C12 C34 ek2sD k3 ½C33 þ C11 eksD
Dðk; s1 ¼ s2 ¼ sD ; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ sD Þ
¼ k4 þ ðC12 C34 ek3sD þ k ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 ek2sD
þ k2 ½C11 C33 C12 C34 eksD k3 ½C33 þ C11 Þ eksD
ek3sD ’ 1 k 3 sD ; ek2sD ’ 1 k 2 sD ;
eksD ’ 1 k sD :
X
n¼4
Pn¼4 ðk; sD Þ ¼ pk ðsD Þ kk ¼ p0 ðsD Þ þ p1 ðsD Þ k þ p2 ðsD Þ k2 þ p3 ðsD Þ k3 þ p4 ðsD Þ k4
k¼0
Pn ðk; sD Þ ¼ k4
808 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
q0 ðsD Þ ¼ C12 C34 ; q1 ðsD Þ ¼ C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD
a0 ¼ 0; a1 ¼ 0; a2 ¼ 0; a3 ¼ 0; a4 ¼ 1; c0 ¼ C12 C34 ;
c1 ¼ C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD ;
c2 ¼ C11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD ;
c3 ¼ ½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11
Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the variation arguments (qi ; qk ) will
subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, and cj. The coefficients aj, cj are continuous
and differentiable functions of their arguments, and direct substitution shows that
a0 þ c0 6¼ 0 ) C12 C34 6¼ 0 8 qi ; qk 2 R þ , k = 0 is not a Pðk; sD Þ þ
Qðk; sD Þ eksD ¼ 0. We assume that Pn ðk; sD Þ; Qm ðk; sD Þ can’t have common
imaginary roots. That is for any real number x: Pn ðk ¼ i x; sD Þ;
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sD Þ 6¼ 0.
½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ þ x4 þ i fx ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ
x3 ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þg 6¼ 0
jPði x; sD Þj2 ¼ x8
jQði x; sD Þj2 ¼ fC12 C34 x2 ðC11 C33 C12 C34
½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þg2 þ fx ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33
C12 C34 3 sD Þ x3 ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þg2
jQði x; sD Þj2 ¼ C212 C234 þ x2 fðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ2
2 C12 C34 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þg
þ x4 fðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ2
2 ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ ð½C11 C33 þ C12
þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þg þ x6 ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þ2
Fðx; sD Þ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 ¼ C212 C234 x2 fðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ2
2 C12 C34 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þg
x4 fðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ2
2 ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þg
x6 ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þ2 þ x8
N2 ¼ fðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ2 2 C12 C34 ðC11 C33 C12 C34
½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þg
N4 ¼ fðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ2
2 ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þg
N6 ¼ ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þ2 ; N8 ¼ 1
X
4
Fðx; sD Þ ¼ jPði xÞj2 jQði xÞj2 ¼ N2k x2k
k¼0
¼ N0 þ N2 x2 þ N4 x4 þ N6 x6 þ N8 x8
810 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
P
4
Hence Fðx; sD Þ ¼ 0 implies N2k x2k ¼ 0 and its roots are given by solving
k¼0
the above polynomial. Furthermore, PR ði x; sD Þ ¼ x4 ; PI ði x; sD Þ ¼ 0
QR ði x; sD Þ ¼ C12 C34 x2 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ
QI ði x; sD Þ ¼ x ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ
x3 ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þ
Hence
PR ði x; sD Þ QI ði x; sD Þ þ PI ði x; sD Þ QR ði x; sD Þ
sin hðsD Þ ¼
jQði x; sD Þj2
And
PR ði x; sD Þ QR ði x; sD Þ þ PI ði x; sD Þ QI ði x; sD Þ
cos hðsD Þ ¼
jQði x; sD Þj2
x4 fC12 C34 x2 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þg
cos hðsD Þ ¼
C212 C234 þ x2 fðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ2
2 C12 C34 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þg
þ x4 fðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ2
2 ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þg
þ x6 ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þ2
PðkÞ ¼ k4 ; Qðk; sD Þ ¼ C12 C34 þ k ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ
þ k2 ðC11 C33 C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ
þ k3 f½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 g
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 811
depend on RFID’s N-turn multilayer coil antennas system’s parameters C1, R1, sD
values and antennas parameters. Unless strictly necessary, the designation of the
variation arguments. Resistor R1, capacitor C1, sD and N-turn multilayer coil
antennas system’s parameters will subsequently be omitted from P, Q, aj, cj. The
coefficients aj, cj are continuous, and differentiable functions of their arguments, and
direct substitution shows that a0 þ c0 6¼ 0; C12 C34 6¼ 0.
g1 n1
C12 C34 6¼
g3 n3
P
2 P
2
ð Rdci Þ Rdci
1
Lcalc1 þ 1
R1
Lcalc1
i¼1 1
þ 1
ð i¼1
Lcalc2 Þ
¼½ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ½ Lcalc2 R1
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 6¼ 0
C1 ½1 þ Lcalc2
Lcalc1 þ 2 K LLcalc2
calc1
C1 ½Lcalc1
Lcalc2 þ 1 þ 2 K Lcalc2
Lcalc1
C12 C34 þ k ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ þ k2 ðC11 C33
Q(kÞ C12 C34 ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ þ k3 f½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 g
j j¼j j
PðkÞ k4
812 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
@Rek
^1 ðLcalc1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; sD ¼ const;
@Lcalc1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðLcalc2 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; sD ¼ const
@Lcalc2 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsD Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; N-turn multilayer coil antennas system’s parameters
@sD k¼ix
¼ const where x 2 R þ :
When writing PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, and
inserting k ¼ i x Into RFID N-turn multilayer coil antennas system’s character-
istic equation, x must satisfy the following:
8.1 N-Turn Multilayer Circular Coil Antennas Transceiver System Stability … 813
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin x sD ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
and
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos x sD ¼ hðxÞ ¼ :
jQði xÞj2
kða1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi 2 R þ Þ
xða1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi 2 R þ Þ
and keeping all parameters except one (x) and sD . The derivation closely follows
that in reference [BK]. Differentiating N-turn multilayer coil antennas system
characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eksD ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter
(x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark:
x ¼ ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi ; a1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi 2 R þ
Where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i x, and bearing Pði xÞ ¼ Pði xÞ;
Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ then i Pk ði xÞ ¼ Px ði xÞ and i Qk ði xÞ ¼ Qx ði xÞ that
on the surface jPði xÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 , one obtains
When (x) can be any N-turn multilayer coil antennas system parameters R1, C1,
and time delay sD etc. Where for convenience, we have dropped the arguments
ði x; xÞ, and where Fx ¼ 2 ½ðPRx PR þ PIx PI Þ ðQRx QR þ QIx QI Þ
Fx ¼ 2 ½ðPRx PR þ PIx PI Þ ðQRx QR þ QIx QI Þ ; xx ¼ Fx =Fx .
We define U and V:
PR ði x; sD Þ ¼ x4 ; PI ði x; sD Þ ¼ 0
QR ði x; sD Þ ¼ C12 C34 x2 ðC11 C33 C12 C34
½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 2 sD Þ
QI ði x; sD Þ ¼ x ðC11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 3 sD Þ
x3 ð½C11 C33 þ C12 þ C34 sD C33 C11 Þ
@x @x Fs
Fx þ FsD ¼ 0; sD 2 I ) ¼ D
@sD @sD Fx
1 @Rek 1 2 ½U þ sD jPj2 þ i Fx @x Fs
^ ðsD Þ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ; ^ ðsD Þ ¼ Ref g; ¼ xs D ¼ D
@sD FsD þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2 @sD Fx
@Rek
signf^1 ðsD Þg ¼ signfð Þ g;
@sD k¼ix
@x
@x U @s þV
signf^1 ðsD Þg ¼ signfFx g signfsD þxþ D
g
@sD jPj2
@Rek 2 ½U þ sD jPj2 þ i Fx
^1 ðsD Þ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@sD FsD þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
@Rek 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ FsD ðU þ sD P2 Þg
^1 ðsD Þ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@sD Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
D
The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (sD ) which fit the equa-
tion: sD ¼ xh þþ ðsðsDDÞÞ and h þ ðsD Þ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when
x ¼ x þ ðsD Þ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally when all N-turn multilayer coil
antennas system parameters are known and the stability switch due to various time
delay values sD is describe in the following expression:
Remark: we know Fðx; sD Þ ¼ 0 implies it roots xi ðsD Þ and finding those delays
values sD which xi is feasible. There are sD values which xi are complex or
imaginary numbers, then unable to analyse stability.
Lemma 1.1 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive and real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 defined for
s 2 I, which is continuous and differentiable. Assume further that if k ¼ i x,
x 2 R, then Pn ði x; sÞ þ Qn ði x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R hold true. The functions
Sn ðsÞ; n 2 N0 , are continuous and differentiable on I.
Theorem 1.2 Assume that xðsÞ is a positive real root of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 defined for
s 2 I; I
R þ 0 , and at some s 2 I, Sn ðs Þ ¼ 0 for some n 2 N0 then a pair of simple
conjugate pure imaginary roots k þ ðs Þ ¼ i xðs Þ; k ðs Þ ¼ i xðs Þ of
Dðk; sÞ ¼ 0 exist at s ¼ s which crosses the imaginary axis from left to right if
dðs Þ [ 0 and cross the imaginary axis from right to left if dðs Þ\0 where
same is true when S0n ðs Þ ¼ 0 the following result can be useful in identifying
values of s where stability switches happened.
Remark: Lemma 1.1 and Theorems 1.2, 1.3: In the first and second cases
we discuss delay parameter s and in the third case we discuss delay parameter sD
[18, 19].
818 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
A double rectangular spiral antennas are constructed from two antennas, each
antenna is a rectangular spiral antenna. Antennas are connected in series with micro
strip line and to the RFID IC. A double rectangular spiral antennas system influence
by electromagnetic interferences which effect there stability behavior. Additionally,
micro strip line which connected antennas in the series has parasitic effect, delay in
time Dl . We inspect our system performances under electromagnetic interferences
and micro strip parasitic effects. Generally double spiral micro strip antenna over
rectangular patch improved the bandwidth of Mobile, WiMAX applications. Micro
strip line feed technique enhances the bandwidth of the simple micro strip antenna.
Every rectangular spiral antenna has a parasitic DC resistance which needs to be
calculated. The below figure describes the double rectangular spiral antenna system
[1, 7, 8] (Fig. 8.3).
Index (i) indicates first rectangular spiral antenna (i = 1) or second rectangular
spiral antenna (i = 2). We define RFID’s coil dimensional parameters. A0i, B0i—
Overal dimensions of the coil. Aavgi, Bavgi—Average dimensions of the coil. ti—
track thickness. wi—track width. gi—gaps between tracks. Nci—number of turns.
di—equivalent diameter of the track. Average coil area Aci = Aavgi ∙ Bavgi. Pi—
coil manufacturing technology parameter. Integrating all those parameters gives the
equations for rectangular spiral antenna inductance calculation:
l0 X4
2 Aavgi Bavgi
Lcalci ¼ ð Xki X3 Þ NciPi ; X1i ¼ Aavgi lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ
p k¼1;k6¼3 di ðAavgi þ A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ
2 Aavgi Bavgi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
X2i ¼ Bavgi lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ; X3i ¼ 2 ðAavgi þ Bavgi A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ
di ðBavgi þ A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ
ðAavgi þ Bavgi Þ 2 ðti þ wi Þ
X4i ¼ ; di ¼ ; Aavgi ¼ A0i Nci ðgi þ wi Þ;
4 p
Bavgi ¼ B0i Nci ðgi þ wi Þ
The rectangular spiral antenna length is calculated as follows: l0i is the length of
the first turn l0i ¼ 2 ðA0i þ B0i Þ ðwi þ gi Þ. lk is the length of turn k + 1. We
define the following:
NX
ci 1
analytical work to effectively study the local stability of models involving delay
dependent parameters. The stability of a given steady state is simply determined by
the graphs of some function of s1, s2 which can be expressed, explicitly and thus
can be easily depicted by MATLAB and other popular software. We need only look
at one such function and locate the zeros. This function often has only two zeros,
providing thresholds for stability switches. As time delay increases, stability
changes from stable to unstable to stable. We emphasize the local stability aspects
of some models with delay dependent parameters, additionally there is a general
geometric criterion that, theoretically speaking, can be applied to models with many
delays, or even distributed delays. The simplest case of a first order characteristic
equation, providing more user friendly geometric and analytic criteria for stability
switches. The analytical criteria provided for the first and second order cases can be
used to obtain some insightful analytical statements and can be helpful for con-
ducting simulations. Double rectangular spiral antennas can be represented as a two
inductors in series (Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2), parasitic resistances (RDC-1 and RDC-2) and
micro strip delay line. The rectangular spiral antennas in series are connected in
parallel to RFID TAG IC. The Equivalent Circuit of Passive RFID TAG with
double rectangular antennas is Capacitor (C1) and Resistor (R1) in parallel with
double rectangular antennas in the series [85] (Fig. 8.4).
Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2 are mostly formed by traces on planar PCB. 2 ∙ Lm element
represents the mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2. Since two inductors
(Lcalc-1, Lcalc-2) are in series and there is a mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and
Lcalc-2, the total antenna inductance LT: LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 +2 ∙ Lm and
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 . Lm is the mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2.
K is the coupling coefficient of two inductors 0 K 1. I(t) is the current that flow
through a double rectangular spiral antenna. V1 and V1 are the voltages on Lcalc-1
and Lcalc-2 respectively. Vm is the voltage on double loop antenna mutual induc-
tance element. We neglect the voltage on microstrip delay line Vl ! e. ILcalc1 ¼
IðtÞ ILcalc2 ¼ Iðt Dl Þ; IRdc2 ¼ Iðt Dl Þ; ILm ¼ Iðt Dl Þ.
dVC1 VC
C1 þ 1 þ IðtÞ ¼ 0; VC1 ¼ VLcalc1 þ VRdc1 þ VLcalc2 þ VRdc2 þ Vm
dt R1
dVR1 dVC1 dVLcalc1 dVRdc1 dVLcalc2 dVRdc2 dVm
¼ ¼ þ þ þ þ
dt dt Z dt dt dt Z dt dt
1 1
IðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 dt; Iðt Dl Þ ¼ VLcalc2 dt
Lcalc1 Lcalc2
dIðtÞ VLcalc1 dIðt Dl Þ VLcalc2 dIðt Dl Þ dIðtÞ
¼ ; ¼ ;j jX
dt Lcalc1 dt Lcalc2 dt dt
dIðt Dl Þ dIðtÞ VL VL
X ! e; ) calc1 ¼ calc2 ;
dt dt Lcalc1 Lcalc2
dIðt Dl Þ VL
Vm ¼ 2 Lm ¼ 2 Lm calc2
dt Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi VLcalc2 Lcalc1
Vm ¼ 2 K f Lcalc1 Lcalc2 g ¼2K VLcalc2
Lcalc2 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVm pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi dVLcalc2 =dt Lcalc1 dVLcalc2
¼ 2 K f Lcalc1 Lcalc2 g ¼2K
dt Lcalc2 Lcalc2 dt
Z
1 1
VLcalc1 dt þ
½VLcalc1 þ IðtÞ Rdc1 þ VLcalc2
Lcalc1 R1
dVL dIðtÞ
þ Iðt Dl Þ Rdc2 þ Vm þ C1 ½ calc1 þ Rdc1
dt
dt rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
dVLcalc2 dIðt Dl Þ Lcalc1 dVLcalc2
þ þ Rdc2 þ 2 K ¼0
dt dt Lcalc2 dt
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ 1 Lcalc2 1 Lcalc2
½ þ VLcalc1 þ ½ þ þ2 K
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 R1 R1 Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
C1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ dVLcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2 d 2 VLcalc1
þ þ C1 ½1 þ þ2K ¼0
Lcalc1 dt Lcalc1 Lcalc1 dt2
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 823
dVLcalc1 d 2 VLcalc1
g1 VLcalc1 þ g2 þ g3 ¼0
dt dt2
1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
g1 ¼ þ ;
Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc2 1 Lcalc2 C1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ 1
g2 ¼ þ2 K þ þ
R1 Lcalc1 R1 Lcalc1 Lcalc1 R1
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc2 Lcalc2
g3 ¼ C1 ½1 þ þ2 K g ;
Lcalc1 Lcalc1
g1 ¼ g1 ðR1 ; Lcalc1 Rdc1 ; Rdc2 Þ
g2 ¼ g2 ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; R1 ; C1 ; K; Rdc1 ; Rdc2 Þ;
g3 ¼ g3 ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; C1 ; KÞ
In the same manner we find our VLcalc2 differential equation. We get the fol-
lowing differential equation respect to VLcalc1 variable, n1 ; n2 ; n3 are global
parameters.
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ Lcalc1 1 2K Lcalc1
½ þ VLcalc2 þ ½ þ þ
Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 R1 R1 Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
C1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ dVLcalc2 Lcalc1 Lcalc1 d 2 VLcalc2
þ þ C1 ½1 þ þ2 K ¼0
Lcalc2 dt Lcalc2 Lcalc2 dt2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ Lcalc1 1 2K Lcalc1
n1 ¼ þ ; n2 ¼ þ þ
Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 R1 Lcalc2 R1 R1 Lcalc2
C1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
þ
Lcalc2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lcalc1 Lcalc1
n3 ¼ C1 ½1 þ þ2 K ; n ¼ ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; R1 ; Rdc1 ; Rdc2 Þ
Lcalc2 Lcalc2 1
n2 ¼ ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; R1 ; Rdc1 ; Rdc2 ; C1 ; KÞ; n3 ¼ ðLcalc1 ; Lcalc2 ; C1 ; KÞ
Summary: We get our RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna
system’s four differential equations.
0 1
dX1
dt 0 1 0 X1 1
B dVL C C11 ... C14
B calc1 C B BV C
B dt C B .. .. .. C
C B Lcalc1 C g2 g1 n2
B dX2 C¼@ . . . AB C; C11 ¼ ; C12 ¼ ; C33 ¼ ;
B C @ X2 A g3 g3 n3
@ dt A
dVLcalc2 C41 C44 VLcalc2
dt
n1
C3 4 ¼ ; C21 ¼ C43 ¼ 1
n3
C13 ¼ C14 ¼ C22 ¼ C23 ¼ C24 ¼ C31 ¼ C32 ¼ C41 ¼ C42 ¼ C44 ¼ 0
The RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system’s first and
second rectangular spiral antenna are composed of a thin wire or a thin plate
element. Units are all in cm, and a1, a2 are radiuses of the first and second wires in
cm. There inductances can be calculated by the following formulas:
l0 X
4
l X
4
Lcalc1 ¼ ð Xk1 X3 Þ Nc1
P1
; Lcalc2 ¼ 0 ð Xk2 X3 Þ Nc2
P2
p k¼1;k6¼3 p k¼1;k6¼3
dV dV
We consider no delay effect on dX dt ; ; dt ; Ldt
Lcalc1 dX2
1
dt
calc2
. The RFID TAGs with
double rectangular spiral antenna system differential equations under electromag-
netic interferences (delays terms) influence only RFID first and second rectangular
spiral antenna voltages VLcalc1 ðtÞ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ and voltages derivatives X1 ðtÞ and X2 ðtÞ
dX1 ðtÞ dVLcalc1 ðtÞ dX2 ðtÞ dVLcalc2 ðtÞ
respect to time, there is no influence on dt ; dt ; dt ; dt .
0 1
dX1 0 1 0 X ðt D Þ 1
dt
B dVLcalc1 C C11 . . . C14 1 1
B dt C B .. .. .. C B B VLcalc1 ðt s1 Þ C
C
B dX2 C¼@ . . . A @ X2 ðt D2 Þ A
@ dt A
dVLcalc2 C41 C44 VLcalc2 ðt s2 Þ
dt
826 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
To find equilibrium points (fixed points) of the RFID TAGs with double rect-
angular spiral antenna system is by
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system
consists in adding to coordinates ½X1 VLcalc1 X2 VLcalc2 arbitrarily small increments of
exponential ½x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2 ekt , and retaining the first order terms in
X1 VLcalc1 X2 VLcalc2 . The system of four homogeneous equations leads to a polyno-
mial characteristics equation in the eigenvalues k. The polynomial characteristics
equations accept by set the below voltages and voltages derivative respect to time
into two RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system equations.
RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system fixed values with
arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2 ekt are: i = 0
(first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc.,
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X1 ðtÞ ¼ X1 þ x1 ekt ; VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x2 ekt ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ekt
We choose the above expressions for our X1 ðtÞ; VLcalc1 ðtÞ and X2 ðtÞ; VLcalc2 ðtÞ as
small displacement ½x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2 from the system fixed points at time t = 0.
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X1 þ x1 ; VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X2 þ x2 ; VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2
Table 8.2 RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas variables for different k and t
values
k<0 k>0
t=0 ðiÞ ðiÞ
X1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X1 þ x1 X1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X1 þ x1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 VLcalc1 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X2 þ x2 X2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ X2 þ x2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 VLcalc2 ðt ¼ 0Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2
ðiÞ ðiÞ
t>0 X1 ðtÞ ¼ X1 þ x1 ejkjt X1 ðtÞ ¼ X1 þ x1 ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ejkjt VLcalc1 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x1 ejkjt X2 ðtÞ ¼ X2 þ x1 ejkjt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ejkjt VLcalc2 ðtÞ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ejkjt
ðiÞ
t>0 X1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ X1 X1 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ x1 ejkjt
t!∞
VLcalc1 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ VLcalc1
ðiÞ VLcalc1 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ vLcalc1 ejkjt
X2 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ X2
ðiÞ X2 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ x2 ejkjt
VLcalc2 ðt ! 1Þ ¼ VLcalc2
ðiÞ VLcalc2 ðt ! 1; k [ 0Þ vLcalc2 ejkjt
The speeds of flow toward or away from the selected fixed point for RFID TAGs
with double rectangular spiral antenna system voltages and voltages derivatives
respect to time are as follow:
h i
ðiÞ ðiÞ
dX1 ðtÞ X1 ðt þ DtÞ X1 ðtÞ X1 þ x1 ekðt þ DtÞ X1 þ x1 ekt
¼ lim ¼ lim
dt Dt!0 Dt Dt!0 Dt
x1 ekt ekDt 1 ekDt 1 þ kDt
¼ lim ! k x1 ekt
Dt!0 Dt
First we take the RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system
dV dV
voltages VLcalc1 ; VLcalc2 differential equations: X1 ¼ Ldt calc1
; X2 ¼ Ldt
calc2
and add-
ing coordinates ½X1 VLcalc1 X2 VLcalc2 arbitrarily small increments of exponential
terms ½x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2 ekt and retaining the first order terms in x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2 .
ðiÞ ði¼0Þ
k vLcalc1 ekt ¼ X1 þ x1 ekt ; X1 ¼ 0 ) k vLcalc1 þ x1 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ði¼0Þ
k vLcalc2 e kt
¼ X2 þ x2 e kt
; X2 ¼ 0 ) k vLcalc2 þ x2 ¼ 0
Second we take the RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antenna system’s
voltages derivatives X1 ; X2 differential equations:
828 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
dX1 dX2
¼ C12 VLcalc1 þ C11 X1 ; ¼ C34 VLcalc2 þ C33 X2
dt dt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
k x1 ekt ¼ C12 ½VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ekt þ C11 ½X1 þ x1 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
k x1 ekt ¼ C12 VLcalc1 þ C11 X1 þ C12 vLcalc1 ekt þ C11 x1 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed points C12 VLcalc1 þ C11 X1 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
C12 VLcalc1 þ C11 X1 ¼ 0 ) k x1 þ C11 x1 þ C12 vLcalc1 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
k x2 ekt ¼ C34 VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ekt þ C33 ½X2 þ x2 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
k x2 ekt ¼ C34 VLcalc2 þ C33 X2 þ C34 vLcalc2 ekt þ C33 x2 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed points C34 VLcalc2 þ C33 X2 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
C34 VLcalc2 þ C33 X2 ¼ 0 ) k x2 þ C33 x2 þ C34 vLcalc2 ¼ 0
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X1 ðt D1 Þ ¼ X1 þ x1 ekðtD1 Þ ; VLcalc1 ðt s1 Þ ¼ VLcalc1 þ vLcalc1 ekðts1 Þ
ðiÞ ðiÞ
X2 ðt D2 Þ ¼ X2 þ x2 ekðtD2 Þ ; VLcalc2 ðt s2 Þ ¼ VLcalc2 þ vLcalc2 ekðts2 Þ
The small increments Jacobian of our RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral
antenna system is as bellow:
!11 ¼ k þ C11 ekD1 ; !12 ¼ C12 eks1 ; !13 ¼ 0; !14 ¼ 0; !21 ¼ ekD1 ;
!22 ¼ k; !23 ¼ 0; !24 ¼ 0
!31 ¼ 0; !32 ¼ 0; !33 ¼ k þ C33 ekD2 ; !34 ¼ C34 eks2 ;
!41 ¼ 0; !42 ¼ 0; !43 ¼ ekD2 ; !44 ¼ k
0 1
0 1 x1 0 1
!11 . . . !14 B C !11 ... !14
B . C B vLcalc1 C B .
B . . .
.. C B C .. .. C
@ . .. AB C ¼ 0; A k I ¼ B@ .. .
C
. A; det jA k Ij ¼ 0
B x1 C
@ A
!41 !44 !41 !44
vLcalc2
P
2 P2
k½ si þ Dj
Dðk; s1 ; s2 ; D1 ; D2 Þ ¼ k4 þ C12 C34 e i¼1 j¼1
P
2 P
2
k½s2 þ Dj k½s1 þ Dj
þ k fC11 C34 e j¼1
þ C33 C12 e j¼1
g
P
2
k Dj
kðD2 þ s2 Þ kðD1 þ s1 Þ
þ k fC34 e
2
C12 e þ C11 C33 e j¼1
g
k3 fC33 ekD2 þ C11 ekD1 g
s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0
s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D; D2 ¼ 0 or s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ D
We need to get characteristics equations for all above stability analysis cases. We
study the occurrence of any possible stability switching resulting from the increase
of value of the time delays s; D; sD for the general characteristic equation
Dðk; s=D=sD Þ. If we choose s parameter then Dðk; sÞ ¼ Pn ðk; sÞ þ Qm ðk; sÞ eks .
P
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ :Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ nk¼0 Pk ðsÞ kk ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ k þ
P2 ðsÞ k þ P3 ðsÞ k þ . . .. . .
2 3
Pm
The expression for Qm ðk; sÞ is Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ q0 ðsÞ þ
k¼0
q1 ðsÞ k þ q2 ðsÞ k2 þ . . .. . .
The case we analyze is when there is delay in RFID TAGs first and second
rectangular spiral antennas voltages (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s) and no delay in RFID TAGs first
and second rectangular spiral antennas voltages derivatives. The general charac-
teristic equation D(k, s) is as follow:
830 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
Pn
The expression for Pn ðk; sÞ: Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ k¼0 Pk ðsÞ k
k
X
n
Pn ðk; sÞ ¼ Pk ðsÞ k ¼ P0 ðsÞ þ P1 ðsÞ k þ P2 ðsÞ k þ P3 ðsÞ k þ P4 ðsÞ k
k 2 3 4
k¼0
X
m
Qm ðk; sÞ ¼ qk ðsÞ kk ¼ C12 C34 þ k ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33
k¼0
1
C12 C34 s þ k2 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 ; q0 ðsÞ ¼ C12 C34
2
1
q1 ðsÞ ¼ C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s; q2 ðsÞ ¼ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12
2
P
4 P
2
aj k j ; QðkÞ ¼ cj k j and the coefficients faj ðqi ; qk ; sÞ; cj ðqi ; qk ; sÞg 2 R
j¼0 j¼0
depend on qi ; qk and delay s, qi ; qk are any double rectangular spiral coils antennas
system’s parameters, other parameters keep as a constant [5, 6].
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 831
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ 6¼ 0; pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ
¼ x4 þ i x3 ðC33 þ C11 Þ x2 C11 C33
Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ ¼ C12 C34 þ i x ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s
1
x2 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12
2
pn ðk ¼ i x; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ i x; sÞ
1
¼ x4 x2 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 þ C11 C33
2
þ C12 C34 þ i x3 ðC33 þ C11 Þ
þ i x ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s 6¼ 0
We need to find the expression for Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPði x; sÞj2 jQði x; sÞj2
P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 N2k x
2k
¼ 0 and its roots are given by
solving the above polynomial. Furthermore PR ði x; sÞ ¼ x4 x2 C11 C33
PI ði x; sÞ ¼ x3 ðC33 þ C11 Þ; QR ði x; sÞ
1
¼ C12 C34 x2 ½ C12 C34 s2 C34 C12
2
QI ði x; sÞ ¼ x ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s
Hence
PR ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
PR ði x; sÞ QR ði x; sÞ þ PI ði x; sÞ QI ði x; sÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði x; sÞj2
fx4 x2 C11 C33 g fC12 C34 x2 ½12 C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 g
þ x4 ðC33 þ C11 Þ ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s
cos hðsÞ ¼ 2
C12 C234 þ x2 f½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s 2 2 C12 C34
½12 C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 g þ x4 ½12 C12 C34 s2 C34 C12 2
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 833
These are continuous and differentiable in s based on Lemma 1.1. Hence we use
Theorem 1.2 and this prove the Theorem 1.3.
Our RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral system for x1 vLcalc1 x2 vLcalc2 leads
to a characteristic equation for the eigenvalue k having the form
PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0; The case s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0.
1
Qk ¼ C12 C34 þ k ½C11 C34 þ C12 C33 C12 C34 s þ k2 ½ C12 C34 s2
2
C34 C12
g1 n1 ½Lcalc1
1
þ ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
R1 Lcalc1 ½Lcalc2 þ
1 ðRdc1 þ Rdc2 Þ
R1 Lcalc2
¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 6¼ 0
g3 n3 C2 ½1 þ Lcalc2 þ 2 K Lcalc2 ½1 þ Lcalc1 þ 2 K Lcalc1
1 Lcalc1 Lcalc1 Lcalc2 Lcalc2
parameters, Rek may, at the crossing Change its sign from (−) to (+), i.e. from a
ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ ð0Þ
stable focus Eð0Þ ðX1 ; VLcalc1 ; X2 ; VLcalc2 Þ ¼ ð0; 0; 0; 0Þ to an unstable one, or vice
versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial
derivatives with respect to C1 ; R1 ; s and double rectangular spiral coils antennas
parameters [2, 3].
@Rek
^1 ðC1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; R1 ; s; double rectangular spiral antennas parametrs ¼ const
@C1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðR1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; s; double rectangular spiral antennas parametrs ¼ const
@R1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðLcalc1 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; s ¼ const
@Lcalc1 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðLcalc2 Þ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; s ¼ const
@Lcalc2 k¼ix
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; double rectangular spiral antennas parametrs
@s k¼ix
¼ const where x 2 R þ :
P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 N2k x
2k
¼ 0 when writing PðkÞ ¼
PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼ i x into double
rectangular spiral coils antennas system’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the
following:
836 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin x s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos x s ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ s ¼ hðsÞ þ n 2 p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
þ n2p
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ ; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; R1 ; C1 and RFID TAGs with double rectangular
spiral antennas parameters (Aavg1 ; Bavg2 ; A01 ; B02 ; Nc1 ; Nc2 ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .) indicate the
corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on, ^ðxÞ remember in
kðAavg1 ; Bavg2 ; A01 ; B02 ; Nc1 ; Nc2 ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ; xðAavg1 ; Bavg2 ; A01 ; B02 ; Nc1 ; Nc2 ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .Þ,
and keeping all parameters except one (x) and s. The derivation closely follows that
in reference [BK]. Differentiating RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral
antennas characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific
parameter (x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
Remark: x ¼ Aavg1 ; Bavg2 ; A01 ; B02 ; Nc1 ; Nc2 ; g1 ; g2 ; . . .
Where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; . . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i x, and bearing Pði xÞ ¼
Pði xÞ, Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ then i Pk ði xÞ ¼ Px ði xÞ and i Qk ði xÞ ¼
Qx ði xÞ that on the surface jPði xÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 , one obtains
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 837
P2 ¼ P2R þ P2I . When (x) can be any RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral
antennas parameters R1, C1, And time delay s etc. Where for convenience, we have
dropped the arguments ði x; xÞ, and where
@Rek 2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx @x Fs
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ; ^1 ðsÞ ¼ Ref g; ¼ xs ¼
@s Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj 2 @s F x
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ signfð Þ g; signf^1 ðsÞg
@s k¼ix
@x U @x
@s þ V
¼ signfFx g signfs þxþ g
@s jPj2
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þ ; C1 ; R1 ; RFID TAGs with double rectangular
@s k¼ix
spiral antennas parameters ¼ const where x 2 R þ :
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 839
For our stability switching analysis we choose each of our system’s rectangular
spiral antenna on a substrate, width is 300 lm and lr = 450. The antenna is
constructed from silver ointment which his resistance is bigger than pure silver by
50 %. Track width is 20 lm, gap between tracks 20 lm, track depth is 20 lm up 10
100 lm. The requested rectangular spiral antenna inductance is 2.66 mH and
parasitic resistance less than 10 X. We need to find the possible number of rect-
angular spiral antenna’s turns (Nc1 and Nc2 for the first and second rectangular
spiral antenna respectively). Since each RFID antenna substrate permeability is 450
(lr = 450), our RFID antennas permeability is an average value between air per-
meability and magnet. We consider that the TAGs permeability is 100–300 (lr) and
possible TAGs dimension: 5 mm 5 mm, 6 mm 6 mm, 7 mm 7 mm, 8 mm
8 mm and permeability 100, 200, 300 (lr). Tables 8.3, 8.4, and 8.5 describes the
analysis for l = lr ∙ l0 (lr = 100, 200, 300). Table 8.3 is for l = lr ∙ l0; lr = 100; l
= 125.66 ∙ (1e−6) H/m. Table 8.4 is for l = lr ∙ l0; lr = 200; l = 251.32 ∙ (1e−6)
H/m and Table 8.5 is for l = lr ∙ l0; lr = 300; l = 376.98 ∙ (1e−6) H/m.
Results: The most close inductance analysis to 2.66 mH is 2.7 mH and subcases.
Result Table 8.3: Lcalc = 2.7 mH, Nc = 60, (A0 = 7 mm) (B0 = 7 mm); l = lr
∙ l0; lr = 100; l = 125.66 ∙ (1e−6) H/m. The DC resistance of rectangular spiral
RFID antenna: RDC ¼ rS LT
¼ rpa
LT
2 . LT—total length of the wire. r—Conductivity of
LT LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼ ; RDC ¼
r S r p a2 r p a2
2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3 g
¼
r p a2
Table 8.3 Rectangular spiral antenna Lcalc as a function of different number of turns for (Nc) for l
= lr ∙ l0; lr = 100; l = 125.66∙(1e−6) H/m
Nc Lcalc (5 mm 5 Lcalc (6 mm 6 Lcalc (7 mm 7 Lcalc (8 mm 8
mm)—[H] mm)—[H] mm)—[H] mm)—[H]
10 1.08 10−4 1.37 10−4 1.67 10−4 1.98 10−4
20 3.383 10−4 4.38 10−4 5.419 10−4 6.48 10−4
30 6.212 10−4 8.25 10−4 0.001 0.0013
60 0.0014 0.002 0.0027 = 2.7 mH 0.0035
100 0.001 0.0024 0.0041 0.0058
150 −0.0014 NaN 0.0021 0.0051
120 1.3598 10−4 0.0018 0.0038 0.0061
170 −0.0040 −0.0012 2.5454 10−4 0.0033
200 −0.0106 −0.0062 −0.0023 NaN
220 −0.0171 −0.0115 −0.0063 −0.0020
250 −0.0306 −0.023 −0.0158 −0.0092
840 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
Table 8.4 Rectangular spiral antenna Lcalc as a function of different number of turns for (Nc) for l
= lr ∙ l0; lr = 200; l = 251.32 ∙ (1e−6)H/m
Nc Lcalc (5 mm Lcalc (6 mm Lcalc (7 mm Lcalc (8 mm
5 mm)—[H] 6 mm)—[H] 7 mm)—[H] 8 mm)—[H]
10 2.17 10−4 2.75 10−4 3.35 10−4 3.97 10−4
20 6.767 10−4 8.76 10−4 0.0011 0.0013
30 0.0012 0.001 0.0021 0.0025
60 0.0027 = 2.7 mH 0.004 0.0055 0.0069
100 0.0020 0.0049 0.0081 0.0116
150 −0.0028 NaN 0.0042 0.0102
120 2.719 10−4 0.0035 0.0077 0.0122
170 −0.008 −0.0025 5.09 10−4 0.0066
200 −0.0212 −0.0123 −0.0046 NaN
220 −0.0342 −0.0229 −0.0127 −0.0039
250 −0.0612 −0.046 −0.0316 −0.0184
Table 8.5 Rectangular spiral antenna Lcalc as a function of different number of turns for (Nc) for l
= lr ∙ l0; lr = 300; l = 376.98 ∙ (1e−6)H/m
Nc Lcalc (5 mm Lcalc (6 mm Lcalc (7 mm Lcalc (8 mm
5 mm)—[H] 6 mm)—[H] 7 mm)—[H] 8 mm)—[H]
10 3.25 10−4 4.13 10−4 5.03 10−4 5.95 10−4
20 0.001 0.0013 0.0016 0.0019
30 0.0019 0.0025 0.0031 0.0038
60 0.0041 0.0061 0.0082 0.0104
100 0.003 0.0073 0.0122 0.0173
150 −0.004 NaN 0.0062 0.0153
120 4.079 10−4 0.0053 0.0115 0.0183
170 −0.0119 −0.0037 7.63 10−4 0.0099
200 −0.0317 −0.0185 −0.0069 NaN
220 −0.0513 −0.0344 −0.0190 −0.0059
250 −0.0918 −0.069 −0.0474 −0.0276
1:689
\10 ) x [ 1:3405 104 m ¼ 134:05 lm;
6:3 107 20 106 x
RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 67 X
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 841
Actually the track is a mixture of silver then the conductivity is half of silver
conductivity.
Result Table 8.4: Lcalc = 2.7 mH, Nc = 60, (A0 = 5 mm) (B0 = 5 mm); l = lr
∙ l0; lr = 200; l = 251.32 ∙ (1e−6) H/m. The DC resistance of rectangular spiral
RFID antenna: RDC ¼ rSLT
¼ rpa
LT
2 . LT—total length of the wire. r—conductivity of
LT LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼ ; RDC ¼
r S r p a2 r p a2
2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3 g
¼
r p a2
1:201
\10 ) x [ 9:5317 105 m ¼ 95:317 lm;
6:3 107 20 106 x
RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 47:65 X
Actually the track is a mixture of silver then the conductivity is half of silver
conductivity.
Follows 8.3 and 8.4 tables results we choose for Lcalc-1 = 2.7 mH
842 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
Rdc1 ¼ 134 X; Lcalc-2 = 2.7 mH; Rdc2 ¼ 95:30 X. Typical other values for
our system R1 = 100 kX, C1 = 23 pF, K = 0.6 (RFID IC is represented as parallel
circuit of capacitor C1 and R1). g1 ¼ 371:21; g2 ¼ 3:395 105 ; g3 ¼ 7:36 1011
Then we get the expression for Fðx; sÞ typical RFID TAGs with double rect-
angular spiral antenna parameters values.
P4
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 N2k x2k ¼ 0
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 843
Table 8.6 RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas systemroots xi(s)
s s = 0.001 s s = 0.01 s s = 0.1 s
x1 1.0e+009* 1.0e+010* 1.0e+011*
x2 −3.5664 −3.5664 −3.5664
x3 −0.0000 + 3.5664i 0.0000 + 3.5664i −0.0000 + 3.5664i
x4 −0.0000 − 3.5664i 0.0000 − 3.5664i −0.0000 − 3.5664i
x5 3.5664 3.5664 3.5664
x6 −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x7 −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i
x8 0.0000 + 0.0000i -0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x9 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i
Table 8.7 RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas system roots xi(s)
s s=1s s=2s s=3s
x1 1.0e+012* 1.0e+012* 1.0e+013*
x2 −3.5664 −7.1327 −1.0699
x3 0 + 3.5664i −0.0000 + 7.1327i −0.0000 + 1.0699i
x4 0 − 3.5664i −0.0000 − 7.1327i −0.0000 − 1.0699i
x5 3.5664 7.1327 1.0699
x6 −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x7 -0.0000-0.0000i 0.0000-0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i
x8 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x9 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i
844 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
Table 8.8 RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas system roots xi(s)
s s=4s s=5s s=6s
x1 1.0e+013* 1.0e+013* 1.0e+013*
x2 −1.4265 −1.7832 −2.1398
x3 0 + 1.4265i 0.0000 + 1.7832i 0 + 2.1398i
x4 0 − 1.4265i 0.0000 − 1.7832i 0 − 2.1398i
x5 1.4265 1.7832 2.1398
x6 −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x7 −0.0000− 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i
x8 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x9 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i
Table 8.9 RFID TAGs with double rectangular spiral antennas system roots xi(s)
s s=7s s=8s s=9s
x1 1.0e+013* 1.0e+013* 1.0e+013*
x2 −2.4965 −2.8531 −3.2097
x3 0.0000 + 2.4965i −0.0000 + 2.8531i −0.0000 + 3.2097i
x4 0.0000 − 2.4965i −0.0000 − 2.8531i −0.0000 − 3.2097i
x5 2.4965 2.8531 3.2097
x6 −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i
x7 −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i
x8 0.0000 + 0.0000i −0.0000 + 0.0000i 0.0000 + 0.0000i
x9 0.0000 − 0.0000i −0.0000 − 0.0000i 0.0000 − 0.0000i
Single turn rectangular planar coil (N = 4) Two turn rectangular planar coil (N = 8) Three turn rectangular planar coil (N = 12)
N
X 4
X 8
P 12
P
L0 ¼ Li Li ¼ L1 þ L2 Li Li
i¼1 i¼1
i¼1 i¼1
i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; N þ L3 þ L4
Mþ 0 2 ðM1;5 þ M2;6 2 ðM1;9 þ M1;5 þ M5;9
þ M3;7 þ M4;8 Þ þ M2;6 þ M2;10 þ M6;10
þ M3;7 þ M3;11 þ M11;7
þ M4;8 þ M4;12 þ M8;12 Þ
M 2 ðM1;3 þ M2;4 Þ 2 ðM1;7 þ M1;3 þ M5;7 2 ðM1;11 þ M1;7 þ M1;3
þ M5;3 þ M2;8 þ M2;4 þ M5;11 þ M5;7 þ M5;3
þ M6;8 þ M6;4 Þ þ M9;11 þ M9;7 þ M9;3
þ M2;12 þ M2;8 þ M2;4
þ M6;12 þ M6;8 þ M6;4
þ M10;12 þ M10;8 þ M10;4 Þ
P X
M M ¼ M 2 ðM1;5 þ M2;6 2 ðM1;9 þ M1;5 þ M5;9
¼ 2 ðM1;3 þ M2;4 Þ þ M3;7 þ M4;8 Þ þ M2;6 þ M2;10 þ M6;10
2 ðM1;7 þ M1;3 þ M5;7 þ M3;7 þ M3;11 þ M11;7
þ M5;3 þ M2;8 þ M2;4 þ M4;8 þ M4;12 þ M8;12 Þ
þ M6;8 þ M6;4 Þ 2 ðM1;11 þ M1;7 þ M1;3
þ M5;11 þ M5;7 þ M5;3
þ M9;11 þ M9;7 þ M9;3
þ M2;12 þ M2;8 þ M2;4
þ M6;12 þ M6;8 þ M6;4
þ M10;12 þ M10;8 þ M10;4 Þ
8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
8.2 Double Rectangular Spiral Coils Antennas System Stability … 847
Table 8.14 Single, two turn, and three turn number of term contributing to M+ and M−
Rectangular planar N+: number of term contributing to M+ N−: number of terms
coil type (number of positive mutual inductance terms) contributing to M−
Single turn 0 4
rectangular planar
coil (n = 1, Zs = 4)
Two turn 8 16
rectangular planar
coil (n = 2, Zs = 8)
Three turn 24 36
rectangular planar
coil (n = 3,
Zs = 12)
Then we get the expression for Fðx; sÞ for typical RFID shifted gate parameters
values.
Fig. 8.6 RFID TAGs double rectangular spiral antennas F(x,s) function
We plot the stability switch diagram based on different delay values of our RFID
double rectangular spiral coils antennas system. Since it is a very complex function
we recommend to solve it numerically rather than analytic.
@Rek 2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼ Ref g
@s Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
@Rek 2 fFx ðV þ x P2 Þ Fs ðU þ s P2 Þg
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð Þk¼ix ¼
@s Fs2 þ 4 ðV þ x P2 Þ2
The stability switch occurs only on those delay values (s) which fit the equation:
s ¼ xh þþ ðsÞ
ðsÞ and h þ ðsÞ is the solution of sin hðsÞ ¼ . . .; cos hðsÞ ¼ . . . when x ¼
x þ ðsÞ if only x þ is feasible. Additionally when all double rectangular spiral coils
antennas system’s parameters are known and the stability switch due to various
time delay values s is describe in the following expression:
Remark: we know Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies it roots xi ðsÞ and finding those delays
values s which xi is feasible. There are s values which xi are complex or imaginary
number, then unable to analyse stability [5, 6].
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 849
We have a system of single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna
(four segments). The system is constructed from four straight thin film inductors
which are connected in a single turn square structure. The straight thin film inductors
are connected by microstrip lines (A, B, and C). The single turn square planar
straight thin film inductors antenna system is connected to transceiver module
through two microstrip lines (D and E) [85]. Index (i) stands for the first (i = 1),
second (i = 2), third (i = 3), and fourth (i = 4) straight thin film inductors. wi is the
width of straight thin film inductor (i) in cm, zi is the thickness of straight thin film
inductor (i) in cm, and li is the length of straight thin film conductor (inductor) in cm.
The calculated inductance of straight thin film inductor (i) is as follow (Li is the
segment inductance in lH):
2 li w i þ zi
Li ¼ 0:002 li fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g½lH ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4
wi þ zi 3 li
Fig. 8.7 Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system
X
N ¼8
LT ¼ Li þ 2 ðM1;5 þ M2;6 þ M3;7 þ M4;8 Þ
i¼1
2 ðM1;7 þ M1;3 þ M5;7 þ M5;3 þ M2;8 þ M2;4 þ M6;8 þ M6;4 Þ
P PN¼8
We define the mutual inductances term as M, (L0 ; L0 ¼ i¼1 Li ).
X
M ¼ 2 ðM1;5 þ M2;6 þ M3;7 þ M4;8 Þ
2 ðM1;7 þ M1;3 þ M5;7 þ M5;3 þ M2;8 þ M2;4 þ M6;8 þ M6;4 Þ
N þ ¼ 4 n ðn 1Þ þ 2 n ðZs 4 nÞ
N ¼ 4 n4 þ 2 n ðZs 4 nÞ þ ðZs 4 n 2Þ ðZs 4 n 1Þ ðZs 4 nÞ=3
Table 8.15 Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna equivalent circuit
VAi 8 i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; 14 expressions
Node voltage Expression
VA1 IRa Ra
VA2 dIL0
IRa Ra La dt
1
VA3 dIL0
IRa Ra ðLa þ L01 Þ dt
1
Fig. 8.8 Square planar straight thin film inductor antenna N=4, N=8, and N=12
Table 8.16 Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna equivalent circuit’s
remarks 1.0–1.6 expressions
Remark no. Expression
1.0 P3 P
3
d IL0 ðt
2
sÞ d 2 IL0 ðtÞ k si
i¼1 i
1
dt2 ¼ 1
dt2 e i¼1
1.1 Pi1 P
j1
P
4 d 2 IL0 ðt s Þ
k¼1 k
d 2 IL0 ðtÞ P
4 k sk
L01 1
dt2 ¼ 1
dt2 L0j e k¼1
i¼2 j¼2
1.2 Pi1 P
j1
P
4
qi li
dIL0 ðt s Þ
k¼1 k
dIL0 ðtÞ P
4
qj lj
k sk
wi zi ¼ wj zj e
1 1 k¼1
dt dt
i¼2 j¼2
1.3 P3 P
3
dIL0 ðt sÞ dIL0 ðtÞ k si
i¼1 i
1
dt ¼ 1
dt e i¼1
1.4 P3 P
3
d 3 IL0 ðt sÞ d 3 IL0 ðtÞ k si
i¼1 i
1
dt3 ¼ 1
dt3 e i¼1
1.5 Pi1 P
j1
P
4 d 3 IL0 ðt s Þ
k¼1 k
d 3 IL0 ðtÞ P
4 k sk
L01 1
dt3 ¼ 1
dt3 L0j e k¼1
i¼2 j¼2
1.6 Pi1 P
j1
P
4
qi li
d 2 IL0 ðt s Þ
k¼1 k
d 2 IL0 ðtÞ P
4
qj lj
k sk
wi zi 1
dt2 ¼ 1
dt2 wj zj e k¼1
i¼2 j¼2
1 1 1 1
ln GMD ¼ ln dj;k f d
þ d
þ d
þ d
12 ð wj;k Þ2 60 ð wj;k Þ4 168 ð wj;k Þ6 360 ð wj;k Þ8
1
þ d
þ . . .g
660 ð wj;k Þ10
1 1 1 1
GMD ¼ exp½ln dj;k f d
þ d
þ d
þ d
12 ð wj;k Þ2 60 ð wj;k Þ4 168 ð wj;k Þ6 360 ð wj;k Þ8
1
þ d
þ . . .g
660 ð wj;k Þ10
We can represent our single turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna system equivalent circuit. Microstrip lines (A, B, and C) are represented as
delay lines s1, s2, and s3 respectively. We neglect microstrip lines D and E parasitic
effects (no delays). The sum of all the mutual P
Inductances, both positive and negative is marked as (SigmaM ¼ M)
inductance. Transceiver module is represented as an equivalent circuit of mixer,
with input and output impedances of the mixer board. The mixer itself has a
common gate input. The input is dominated by parasitic impedances of the package
854 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
and PCB stray, such as shunt capacitance of the device gates along with the bond
wire inductances and resistance which is inversely proportional to the mixer current
setting. In similar way as for the inputs, the impedance at the outputs can be
modeled by a resistance with a shunt PCB stray capacitance and bond wires
inductances. The resistance Ri ¼ qAi li i of a straight thin film (strip) number
(i; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4) is expected to depend on the DC resistivity qi of the straight thin
film strip material and the strip cross section Ai ¼ wi zi ; Ri ¼ wqii lzii . The dimension
of the straight thin film strip that affects the inductance most strongly is the length li .
The width wi has much weaker influence, and straight thin film strip thickness can
be neglected completely for the limit (zi wi ). This is in contrast to the resistance
Ri ¼ wqii lzii , which is inversely proportional to the straight thin film strip cross section
wi zi and depends on the material properties via its resistivity qi [85] (Fig. 8.10).
Inductance of a single turn square planar coil (straight thin film inductors sys-
tem) calculation:
2 li w i þ zi
Li ¼ 0:002 li fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g½lH ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4
w i þ zi 3 li
Fig. 8.10 Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system equivalent circuit
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 855
2 l1 w1 þ z1
L1 ¼ 0:002 l1 fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g;
w1 þ z1 3 l1
2 l2 w2 þ z2
L2 ¼ 0:002 l2 fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g
w2 þ z2 3 l2
2 l3 w3 þ z3
L3 ¼ 0:002 l3 fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g;
w3 þ z3 3 l3
2 l4 w4 þ z4
L4 ¼ 0:002 l4 fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g
w4 þ z4 3 l4
X
N ¼4 X X
N ¼4
LT ¼ Li þ M¼ Li þ M þ M
i¼1 i¼1
Since the currents in parallel straight thin film segments flow in opposite
directions, there is no positive mutual inductance in this segment coil; that is
M þ ¼ 0. The negative mutual inductance is equal to the sum of M1;3 ; M3;1 and
M2;4 ; M4;2 Or, since M1;3 equals M3;1 and M2;4 equals M4;2 ,
M ¼ 2 ðM1;3 þ M2;4 Þ.
1 1 1
GMD1;3 ¼ exp½ln d1;3 f d1;3 2
þ d1;3 4
þ d
1;3 6
þ
12 ðw13 Þ 60 ðw13 Þ 168 ðw13 Þ
1 1
d1;3 8
þ d
1;3 10
þ . . .g
360 ðw13 Þ 660 ðw13 Þ
This expression and that for l1 , when substitute into Q ¼ . . ., yield a mutual
inductance parameter Q1 :
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l1 l21 ðGMD1;3 Þ2 GMD1;3
Q1 ¼ lnf þ 1þ 2
g 1þ þ
GMD1;3 ðGMD1;3 Þ l21 l1
Now, using Mj;k ¼ 2 l Q and the fact that l1 equals l3 we can write
M1;3 ¼ 2 l1 Q1
M1;3 ¼ 2 l1 Q1
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l1 l21 ðGMD1;3 Þ2 GMD1;3
¼ 2 l1 ½lnf þ 1þ g 1 þ þ
GMD1;3 ðGMD1;3 Þ2 l21 l1
856 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
However, because l2 does not equal l4 (l2 [ l4 ; l24 ¼ l2 l4 ), we use two par-
allel (no equal length) filament geometry calculation: Two segments of lengths l2
and l4 , respectively, are separated by a Geometric Mean Distance (GMD2-4). In this
case, 2 M2;4 ¼ ðM2 þ M4 Þ M24 and the individual M terms are calculated using
equation M ¼ 2 l Q and the length corresponding to the
Subscript; that is, M2 ¼ 2 l2 Q2 where Q2 is the mutual inductance parameter
GMD
Q for l2 2;4 . We consider w2 ¼ w4 ¼ w24 (Fig. 8.11).
1 1 1
GMD2;4 = exp½ln d2;4 f d2;4 2
þ d2;4 4
þ d
2;4 6
12 ðw24 Þ 60 ðw24 Þ 168 ðw24 Þ
1 1
þ d2;4 8
þ d
2;4 10
þ . . .g
360 ðw24 Þ 660 ðw24 Þ
Since l2 equals l1 and the GMD2-4 remains constant, Q2 must equal Q1 (Q2 = Q1)
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l2
as calculated from Q2 ¼ lnfGMD l2
2;4
þ 1 þ ðGMD2 Þ2 g . . .. It follows that
2;4
M2 ¼ M1;3 .
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 857
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l2
To obtain Q4 and Q2-4, however, Q4 ¼ l4
lnfGMD 2;4
þ 1 þ ðGMD4 Þ2 g . . . must
2;4
1 X 1 X X 1 X
L0i ¼ Li þ M; Li ! Li þ M 8 i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; M\0; Li [ j Mj
4 4 4
1 X 1 X 1 X 1 X
L01 ¼ L1 þ M; L02 ¼ L2 þ M; L03 ¼ L3 þ M; L04 ¼ L4 þ M
4 4 4 4
Fig. 8.12 Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system equivalent circuit
with delay lines
X
2
IL01 ¼ IR1 ; IL02 ¼ IR1 ; IL03 ¼ IR3 ; IL04 ¼ IR4 ; IL02 ðtÞ ¼ IL01 ðt s1 Þ; IL03 ðtÞ ¼ IL02 ðt s2 Þ ¼ IL01 ðt si Þ
i¼1
X
3 X
3
VA1 VA
IL04 ðtÞ ¼ IL03 ðt s3 Þ ¼ IL02 ðt si Þ ¼ IL01 ðt si Þ; IL04 ¼ ILb ; IL01 ¼ ILa ; IRa ¼ ; IRb ¼ 14
i¼2 i¼1
Ra Rb
d
I Cp ¼ Cp ðVA14 VA1 Þ; ILb ¼ ICp þ IRb ; ICp ¼ ILa þ IRa ; VA4 VA5 ; VA7 VA8 ; VA10 VA11
dt
VA11 VA12 X4 X4
IR4 ¼ ; VCp þ VLa þ VLb þ VL0i þ VRi ¼ 0
R4 i¼1 i¼1
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 859
X
3
VA1 VA VA VA 5
ILa ¼ IL01 ; ILb ¼ IL04 ¼ IL01 ðt si Þ; IRa ¼ ; IRb ¼ 14 ; IL01 ¼ 3 ;
i¼1
Ra Rb R1
VA VA8 VA VA11 VA VA12 d
IL02 ¼ 6 ; IL03 ¼ 9 ; IL04 ¼ 11 ; ICp ¼ Cp ðVA14 VA1 Þ;
R2 R3 R4 dt
X 3 dIL0
IL01 ðt si Þ ¼ ICp þ IRb ; ICp ¼ IL01 þ IRa ; VA1 VA2 ¼ La 1 ;
i¼1
dt
P
3
dIL01 ðt si Þ
dIL01
VA13 VA14 ¼ Lb i¼1
; VA2 VA3 ¼ L01
dt dt
P
2
si Þ dIL01 ðt
dI ðt s1 Þ
L01
VA5 VA6 ¼ L02 0
; VA8 VA9 ¼ L3 i¼1
;
dt dt
P3
dIL0 ðt i¼1 si Þ X4 X4
VA12 VA13 ¼ L04 1 ; VCp þ VLa þ VLb þ VL0i þ VRi ¼ 0
dt i¼1 i¼1
&&&
VA1 ¼ IRa Ra ; VA14 ¼ IRb Rb ; VA3 VA5 ¼ IL01 R1 ; VA6 VA8 ¼ IL02 R2 ;
VA9 VA11 ¼ IL03 R3
d d
VA11 VA12 ¼ IL04 R4 ; ICp ¼ Cp ðVA14 VA1 Þ ¼ Cp ðIRb Rb IRa Ra Þ
dt dt
dIR dIR dIL0 dIL0
ICp ¼ Cp Rb b Cp Ra a ; VA1 VA2 ¼ La 1 ) VA2 ¼ VA1 La 1
dt dt dt dt
dIL01 dILb dILb dIL0
VA2 ¼ IRa Ra La ; VA13 VA14 ¼ Lb ) VA13 ¼ VA14 þ Lb ¼ VA14 þ Lb 4
dt dt dt dt
860 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
P
3
dIL01 ðt si Þ
dIL01 dIL01
VA13 ¼ IRb Rb þ Lb i¼1
; VA2 VA3 ¼ L01 ) VA3 ¼ VA2 L01
dt dt dt
dIL01 dIL01 dIL01
V A3 ¼ I Ra R a L a L01 ¼ IRa Ra ðLa þ L01 Þ
dt dt dt
P
3 P
3
dIL01 ðt si Þ dIL01 ðt si Þ
VA12 VA13 ¼ L04 i¼1
) VA12 ¼ VA13 þ L04 i¼1
dt dt
P
3 P
3 P
3
dIL01 ðt si Þ dIL01 ðt si Þ dIL01 ðt si Þ
VA12 ¼ IRb Rb þ Lb i¼1
þ L04 i¼1
¼ IRb Rb þ ðLb þ L04 Þ i¼1
dt dt dt
VA3 VA5
IL01 ¼ ) VA3 VA5 ¼ IL01 R1 ;
R1
dIL01
VA5 ¼ VA3 IL01 R1 ¼ IRa Ra ðLa þ L01 Þ IL01 R1
dt
dIL02 dIL01 ðt s1 Þ dIL01
VA5 VA6 ¼ L02 ¼ L02 ; VA6 ¼ VA5 L02
dt dt dt
dIL01 dIL01 ðt s1 Þ
VA6 ¼ IRa Ra ðLa þ L01 Þ IL01 R1 L02
dt dt
VA VA8
IL02 ¼ 6 ) VA6 VA8 ¼ IL02 R2 ;
R2
VA8 ¼ VA6 IL02 R2 ¼ VA6 IL01 ðt s1 Þ R2
dIL01 dIL01 ðt s1 Þ
VA8 ¼ IRa Ra ðLa þ L01 Þ IL01 R1 L02 IL01 ðt s1 Þ R2
dt dt
VA11 VA12 X
3
IL04 ¼ ) VA11 VA12 ¼ IL04 R4 ¼ IL01 ðt si Þ R 4 ;
R4 i¼1
X
3
VA11 ¼ VA12 þ IL01 ðt si Þ R 4
i¼1
P
3
dIL01 ðt si Þ X
3
VA11 ¼ IRb Rb þ ðLb þ L04 Þ i¼1
þ IL01 ðt s i Þ R4
dt i¼1
VA9 VA11
IL03 ¼ ) VA9 VA11 ¼ IL03 R3 ;
R3
X
2
VA 9 ¼ VA11 þ IL03 R3 ¼ VA11 þ IL01 ðt si Þ R 3
i¼1
P
3
dIL01 ðt si Þ X
3 X
2
VA9 ¼ IRb Rb þ ðLb þ L04 Þ i¼1
þ IL01 ðt si Þ R4 þ IL01 ðt si Þ R 3
dt i¼1 i¼1
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 861
X
4 X
4 Z
1
VCp þ VLa þ VLb þ VL01 þ VRi ¼ 0; VCp ¼ VA14 VA1 ¼ ICp dt;
i¼1 i¼1
Cp
dILa
VLa ¼ VA1 VA2 ¼ La
dt
dIL X4
VLb ¼ VA13 VA14 ¼ Lb b ; VL0 ¼ VL01 þ VL02 þ VL03 þ VL04 ;
dt i¼1 i
dIL01
VL01 ¼ VA2 VA3 ¼ L01
dt
P
2
dIL01 ðt si Þ
dIL01 ðt s1 Þ
VL02 ¼ VA5 VA6 ¼ L02 ; VL03 ¼ VA8 VA9 ¼ L03 i¼1
dt dt
P
3
dIL01 ðt si Þ X4
VL04 ¼ VA12 VA13 ¼ L04 i¼1
; VRi ¼ VR1 þ VR2 þ VR3 þ VR4 ;
dt i¼1
VR1 ¼ VA3 VA4 ¼ IL01 R1
q1 l1 q l2
VR1 ¼ IL01 ; VR2 ¼ VA6 VA7 ¼ R2 IL01 ðt s1 Þ ¼ IL01 ðt s1 Þ 2
w1 z1 w 2 z2
X2 X2
q l3
VR3 ¼ VA9 VA10 ¼ R3 IL03 ¼ R3 IL01 ðt si Þ ¼ IL01 ðt si Þ 3
i¼1 i¼1
w3 z3
X
3 X
3
q4 l4
VR4 ¼ VA11 VA12 ¼ R4 IL04 ¼ R4 IL01 ðt si Þ ¼ IL01 ðt si Þ
i¼1 i¼1
w4 z4
X
4
q 1 l1 q l2 X2
q l3
VRi ¼ IL01 þ IL01 ðt s1 Þ 2 þ IL01 ðt si Þ 3
i¼1
w 1 z1 w 2 z2 i¼1
w3 z3
X
3
q4 l4
þ IL01 ðt si Þ
i¼1
w4 z4
X
4
q1 l1 X4
qi li X
i1 X4 dIL0
VRi ¼ IL01 þ IL01 ðt sk Þ; VL01 ¼ L01 1
i¼1
w1 z1 w zi
i¼2 i k¼1 i¼1
dt
iP
1
X
4 dIL01 ðt sk Þ
L0i
k¼1
þ
i¼2
dt
P
2 P
3
X dIL01 ðt si Þ dIL01 ðt si Þ
4 dIL01 dIL01 ðt s1 Þ
VL01 ¼ L01 þ L02 þ L03 i¼1
þ L04 i¼1
i¼1
dt dt dt dt
862 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
P
3
dIL01 ðt si Þ
dIL01 dIL04 i¼1
ILa ¼ IL01 ; VLa ¼ La ; ILb ¼ IL04 ) VLb ¼ Lb ¼ Lb
dt dt dt
X
4 X
4
VCp þ VLa þ VLb þ VL0i þ VRi ¼ 0
i¼1 i¼1
P
3 P
i1
Z dIL01 ðt si Þ X4 dIL01 ðt sk Þ
1 dIL0 dIL 0
I Cp dt þ La 1 þ Lb i¼1
þ L01 1 þ L0i k¼1
Cp dt dt dt i¼2
dt
q1 l1 X4
qi li X
i1
þ IL01 þ IL01 ðt sk Þ ¼ 0
w1 z1 w zi
i¼2 i k¼1
We derivate the above equation and get the following expression: (Table 8.17)
P
3 P
i1
2 d 2 IL01 ðt si Þ 2 X
4 d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ
1 d I L0 d IL01
I C p þ La 2 1 þ L b i¼1
þ L01 þ L01 k¼1
Cp dt dt2 dt2 i¼2
dt2
iP
1
X dIL01 ðt sk Þ
q1 l1 dIL01 4
qi li k¼1
þ þ ¼0
w1 z1 dt i¼2
w i zi dt
P
3 P
i1
d 2 IL01 ðt si Þ X d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ
d 2 IL0 d 2 0
IL
4
ICp ¼ Cp fLa 2 1 þ Lb i¼1
þ L01 2 1 þ L0i k¼1
dt dt2 dt i¼2
dt2
ðÞ
P
i1
X dIL01 ðt sk Þ
q1 l1 dI 4
qi li
L01 k¼1
þ þ g
w1 z1 dt w zi
i¼2 i
dt
X
3 X
3
IL01 ðt si Þ ¼ ICp þ IRb ) IRb ¼ IL01 ðt si Þ ICp ; ICp ¼ IL01 þ IRa ) IRa ¼ ICp IL01
i¼1 i¼1
d d X3
I C p ¼ Cp ðIRb Rb IRa Ra Þ ¼ Cp ð½IL01 ðt si Þ ICp Rb ½ICp IL01 Ra Þ
dt dt i¼1
P
3
dIL01 ðt si Þ
i¼1 dIL01 dICp
ðÞ ICp ¼ Cp ðRb þ Ra ½Rb þ Ra Þ
dt dt dt
P
3 iP
1
d 3 IL01 ðt si Þ X d 3 IL01 ðt sk Þ
dICp d 3 IL01 d 3 IL01 4
þ L01 L0i
i¼1 k¼1
¼ Cp fLa 3 þ Lb þ
dt dt dt3 dt3 i¼2
dt3
iP
1
2 X d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ
q1 l1 d IL01 4
qi li k¼1
þ þ g
w1 z1 dt2 i¼2
wi zi dt2
Expression (**):
P
3 P
i1
2 d 2 IL01 ðt si Þ 2 X
4 d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ
d I L01 d I L01
Cp fLa þ Lb i¼1
þ L01 þ L0i k¼1
dt2 dt2 dt2 i¼2
dt2
iP
1 P3
X dIL01 ðt sk Þ dIL01 ðt si Þ
q1 l1 dIL01 4
qi li k¼1 i¼1 dIL01
þ þ g ¼ Cp ðRb þ Ra
w1 z1 dt w zi
i¼2 i
dt dt dt
P
3 iP
1
3 d 3 IL01 ðt si Þ 3 X
4 d 3 IL01 ðt sk Þ
d IL01 d IL01
þ Cp fLa þ Lb i¼1
þ L01 þ L01 k¼1
dt3 dt3 dt3 i¼2
dt3
iP
1
2 0 X d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ
q l1 d I L
4
qi li k¼1
þ 1 21 þ g ½Rb þ Ra Þ
w1 z1 dt w zi
i¼2 i
dt2
Remark 1.0
P
3
P
d 2 IL01 ðt si Þ X
3 kðt
3
si Þ
i¼1
; IL01 ðt si Þ ¼ IL0 þ iL01 e i¼1 ; IL01 ðtÞ ¼ IL0 þ iL01 ekt
dt2 i¼1
1 1
864 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
P
3
P P
3
d 2 IL01 ðt si Þ 3
d 2 IL01 ðt si Þ
d 2 IL01 ðtÞ i¼1
kðt si Þ
i¼1
¼ iL01 k2 ekt ; ¼ iL01 k2 e i¼1 ;
dt2 dt2 dt2
P
3
d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k si
¼ e i¼1
dt2
Remark 1.1
iP
1 P
2
X d 2 IL0i ðt sk Þ d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ
4 d IL01 ðt s1 Þ
2
L0i k¼1
¼ L02 þ L03 k¼1
þ L04
i¼2
dt2 dt2 dt2
P 3
d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ
k¼1
dt2
P
2
X
2 kðt sk Þ
IL01 ðt s1 Þ ¼ IL0 þ iL01 e kðts1 Þ
; IL01 ðt sk Þ ¼ IL0 þ iL01 e k¼1 ;
1 1
k¼1
P
3
X
3 kðt sk Þ
IL01 ðt sk Þ ¼ IL0 þ iL01 e k¼1
1
k¼1
d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðt s1 Þ
IL01 ðtÞ ¼ IL0 þ iL01 ekt ; ¼ iL01 k2 ekt ; ¼ iL01 k2 ekt eks1
1 dt2 dt2
P
2
sk Þ P
d 2 IL01 ðt 2
d IL01 ðt s1 Þ d IL01 ðtÞ ks
2 2
k¼1
k sk
2
¼ 2
e 1
; 2
¼ iL01 k e e k¼1
2 kt
dt dt dt
P2 P
3
d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ P
2
d 2 0
I ðt sk Þ P3
i¼2
dt2 dt2 dt2 dt2
P
i1
P P
X d 2 IL0i ðt sk Þ 2 3
4 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k sk k sk
L0i k¼1
¼ ½L02 e ks1
þ L03 e k¼1 þ L04 e k¼1
i¼2
dt2 dt2
P
i1
P
X d 2 IL0i ðt sk Þ j1
4 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ X 4 k sk
L0i k¼1
¼ 0
Lj e k¼1
i¼2
dt2 dt 2
j¼2
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 865
Remark 1.2
iP
1
X dIL01 ðt sk Þ
4
q i li k¼1 dIL01 ðt s1 Þ dIL01 ðtÞ ks
; ¼ e 1
i¼2
w i zi dt dt dt
iP
1
X dIL01 ðt sk Þ
4
qi li k¼1 q2 l2 dIL01 ðt s1 Þ q l3
¼ þ 3
i¼2
wi zi dt w 2 z2 dt w3 z3
P2 P3
dIL01 ðt sk Þ dIL01 ðt sk Þ
k¼1 q 4 l4 k¼1
þ
dt w 4 z4 dt
dIL01 ðt s1 Þ
IL01 ðt s1 Þ ¼ IL0 þ iL01 ekðts1 Þ ; ¼ iL01 k ekt eks1 ; IL01 ðtÞ
1 dt
dIL0 ðtÞ
¼ IL0 þ iL01 ekt ; 1 ¼ iL01 k ekt
1 dt
P
3
P2 P
2
dIL01 ðt sk Þ P
3
dIL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ dIL01 ðtÞ k sk
k¼1 dIL01 ðtÞ k sk
¼ e k¼1 ; ¼ e k¼1
dt dt dt dt
Pi1
X4
qi li dIL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ q2 l2 dIL01 ðtÞ ks1
¼ e
w zi
i¼2 i
dt w 2 z2 dt
P2 P 3
q3 l3 k sk q4 l4 k sk
þ e k¼1 þ e k¼1
w 3 z3 w 4 z4
Pi1 P
j1
X4
qi li dIL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ dIL01 ðtÞ X 4
qj lj k sk
¼ e k¼1
w zi
i¼2 i
dt dt w zj
j¼2 j
Remark 1.3
P3 P
3
dIL01 ðt i¼1 si Þ dIL01 ðtÞ k si
¼ e i¼1
dt dt
866 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
Remark 1.4
P P3
d 3 IL01 ðt 3i¼1 si Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ k si
¼ e i¼1
dt3 dt3
Remark 1.5
Pi1 Pj1
X
4 d 3 IL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ X 4 k sk
L0i ¼ L0
j e k¼1
i¼2
dt3 dt3 j¼2
Pi1 P2
X
4 d 3 IL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ d 3 IL01 ðt s1 Þ d 3 IL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ
L0i ¼ L02 þ L03 þ L04
dt3 dt3 dt3
i¼2
P
d 3 IL01 ðt 3k¼1 sk Þ
dt3
P2 P
2
d 3 IL01 ðt s1 Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ ks1
d 3 IL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
¼ e ; ¼ e k¼1
dt3 dt3 dt3 dt3
P P3
d 3 IL01 ðt 3k¼1 sk Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
¼ e k¼1
dt3 dt3
Pi1 P
2
X
4 d 3 IL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
L0i ¼ L02 e ks1
þ L03 e k¼1
i¼2
dt3 dt3 dt3
P3
d 3 0
I L ðtÞ k sk
þ L04 1
e k¼1
dt3
P P2
X
4 d 3 IL01 ðt i1k¼1 sk Þ
k sk
L0i 3
¼ ½L02 eks1 þ L03 e k¼1
i¼2
dt
P3
0
k sk d 3 IL01 ðtÞ
þ L4 e k¼1
dt3
Remark 1.6
Pi1 P
j1
X4
qi li d 2 IL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ X 4
qj lj k sk
¼ e k¼1
w zi
i¼2 i
dt2 dt2 w zj
j¼2 j
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 867
iP
1
X d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ
4
qi li k¼1 q2 l2 d 2 IL01 ðt s1 Þ q l3
¼ þ 3
i¼2
w i z i dt 2 w 2 z 2 dt 2 w 3 z3
P2 P3
d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ
k¼1 q4 l4 k¼1
þ
dt2 w4 z4 dt2
P
2
d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ
d IL01 ðt s1 Þ
2
d IL01 ðtÞ
2
eks1 ;
k¼1
¼
dt2 dt2 dt2
P
3
P
2
d 2 IL01 ðt sk Þ P3
d IL01 ðtÞ k sk
2
k¼1 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
¼ e k¼1 ; ¼ e k¼1
dt2 dt2 dt2
Pi1 P2
X4
qi li d 2 IL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ q2 l2 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ ks1 q3 l3 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k sk
¼ e þ e k¼1
w zi
i¼2 i
dt2 w 2 z2 dt2 w 3 z3 dt2
P 3
q4 l4 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k k¼1 sk
þ e
w4 z 4 dt2
Pi1 P
2
X4
qi li d 2 IL01 ðt k¼1 sk Þ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ q2 l2 ks1 q3 l3 k k¼1 sk
¼ ½ e þ e
w zi
i¼2 i
dt2 dt2 w2 z 2 w 3 z3
P 3
q4 l4 k k¼1 sk
þ e
w4 z 4
We can summary remarks 1.0–1.6 in Table 8.16.
Expression (**):
P3 P
j1
d 2 IL01 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ k si d 2 0
I L d 2 0
I L ðtÞ X4 k sk
Cp fLa 2 þ Lb 2
e i¼1 þ L01 2 1 þ 1
2
L0j e k¼1
dt dt dt dt j¼2
P
j1 P3
P
3 P
j1
k si X
4 k sk
n1 ¼ n1 ðk; si ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ ¼ e i¼1 ; n2 ¼ n2 ðk; L0j ; j ¼ 2; 3; 4; sk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3Þ ¼ L0j e k¼1
j¼2
P
j1
X
4
qj lj k sk
n3 ¼ n3 ðk; sk ; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; qj ; lj ; wj ; zj ; j ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4Þ ¼ e k¼1
j¼2
wj zj
d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ q l1 dIL01 ðtÞ dIL01 ðtÞ
Cp fLa þ Lb n1 þ L01 þ n2 þ 1 þ n3 g
dt 2 dt 2 dt 2 dt 2 w1 z1 dt dt
dIL0 ðtÞ dIL01 ðtÞ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ d 3 IL01 ðtÞ
¼ Cp ðRb 1 n1 þ Ra þ Cp fLa þ Lb n1 þ L01
dt dt dt3 dt3 dt3
d 3 IL01 ðtÞ q1 l1 d 2 IL01 ðtÞ d 2 IL01 ðtÞ
þ n2 þ þ n3 g ½Rb þ Ra Þ
dt3 w1 z1 dt2 dt2
dIL01 ðtÞ dX1 ðtÞ d IL01 ðtÞ dX2 ðtÞ d IL01 ðtÞ
2 3
X1 ðtÞ ¼ ; X2 ðtÞ ¼ ¼ 2
; ¼ ; IL01 ¼ IL01 ðtÞ
dt dt dt dt dt3
q1 l1
Cp fLa X2 þ Lb X2 n1 þ L01 X2 þ X2 n2 þ X 1 þ X 1 n3 g
w1 z1
¼ Cp ðRb X1 n1 þ X1 Ra
dX2 dX2 dX2 dX2 q l1
þ Cp fLa þ Lb n1 þ L01 þ n2 þ 1 X2 þ X2 n3 g ½Rb þ Ra Þ
dt dt dt dt w1 z1
P4qj lj
½j¼1 wj zj þ Rb þ Ra
w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ¼ P ; w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
fLa þ Lb þ 4j¼1 L0j g ½Rb þ Ra Cp
P P q l
½La þ Lb þ 4j¼1 L0j þ Cp ½Rb þ Ra 4j¼1 wjj zjj
¼ P
fLa þ Lb þ 4j¼1 L0j g ½Rb þ Ra Cp
dIL0
At fixed point: dt1 ¼ 0; dX dt ¼ 0; dt ¼ 0; X1 ¼ 0; X2 ¼ 0
1 dX2
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna
system consists in adding to its coordinated [X1 X2 IL01 ] arbitrarily small increments
of exponential terms ½x1 x2 iL01 ekt , and retaining the first order terms in x1 x2 iL01 . The
system of eight homogeneous equations leads to a polynomial characteristic
equation in the eigenvaluek. The polynomial characteristic equation accepts by set
the Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system equations.
The Single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system fixed
values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form ½x1 x2 iL01 ekt are; i = 0
(first fixed point), i = 1 (second fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc., [2–4].
ðiÞ ðiÞ
x2 k ekt ¼ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½X1 þ x1 ekt w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½X2 þ x2 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
x2 k ekt ¼ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ X1 w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ X2 w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ x1 ekt
w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ x2 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ
At fixed points: w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ X1 w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ X2 ¼ 0
We can summary our single turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna system arbitrarily small increments equations:
0 10 x 1
k 1 0 1
@ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ k w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 0 AB C
@ x2 A ¼ 0; A k I
1 0 k iL01
0 1
k 1 0
¼ @ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ k w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 0 A
1 0 k
0 1
k 1 0
B C
detðA k IÞ ¼ 0; det@ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ k w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 0 A ¼ 0
1 0 k
k w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 0 w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 0
detðA k IÞ ¼ k det det
0 k 1 k
detðA k IÞ ¼ k ðk þ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0ÞÞ k w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ k ¼ k ½ðk þ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0ÞÞ k þ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
detðA k IÞ ¼ 0 ) k1 ¼ 0; k2 þ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ k þ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ¼ 0
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2 4 w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
k2;3 ¼ ;
2
w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ [ 0; w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ [ 0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w ðs ¼0Þ
w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2 4 ½w 1ðs i;k¼0Þ 2 ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2
2 i;k
k2;3 ¼
2
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w ðs ¼0Þ
w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 1 4 ½w 1ðs i;k¼0Þ 2
2 i;k
k2;3 ¼ ;
2 sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 w ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
k2;3 ¼ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ f1 1 4 1 g
2 ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2
8.3 Single-Turn Square Planar Straight Thin Film Inductors Antenna … 871
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 1
1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ 1 1 4 1 ; k ¼ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 1ðw1 ; w2 Þ
2 2;3
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ w ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
0\f 1 4 1 2
g\1; 1 [0
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2
) 1ðw1 ; w2 Þ\0; k2 \0; k3 \0
w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 1
Case b: 1 4 2
¼0) 2
¼
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 4
1
1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ 1; k2;3 ¼ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ; k2 \0; k3 \0
2
w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ w1 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 1
Case c: 1 4 2
\0 ) 2
[
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 4
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
w ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ
1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ a b j; 1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ 1 1 4 1
½w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 2
1 1
k2;3 ¼ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ 1ðw1 ; w2 Þ ¼ w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ða b jÞ; w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ [ 0
2 2
We get three eigenvalues for our single turn square planar straight thin film
inductors antenna system. The first eigenvalue (k1) is equal to zero and other
eigenvalues (k2, k3) can be real numbers (k2 ; k3 2 R) and negative (cases a
and b) or complex conjugate numbers (k2;3 ¼ 12 w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ ða b jÞ;
w2 ðsi;k ¼ 0Þ [ 0).
872 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
If the first eigenvalue (k1 = 0) and two other eigenvalues (k2 ; k3 2 R) are negative
and real numbers then our single turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna system fixed point is attracting line. If the first eigenvalue (k1 = 0) and two
other eigenvalues (k2 ; k3 2 C) are complex conjugate numbers with negative real
part (a ¼ 1; a\0) then our single turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna system fixed point is attracting stable spiral node line [2–4].
The next cases we analyze are when at least one of the delay parameters is real
and positive value. We analyze our single turn square planar straight thin film
inductors antenna system for the following cases:
Remark: It is reader exercise to analyze single turn square planar straight thin film
inductors antenna system stability for cases 1 to 7 (at least one delay parameter
s1 ; s2 ; s3 is positive and real number). The stability analysis is done by using geo-
metric stability switch criteria in delay differential systems (E. Beretta and Y. Kuang).
It is a practical guideline that combines graphical information with analytical work to
effectively study the local stability of single turn square planar straight thin film
inductors antenna system model involving delay dependent parameters. The stability
of single turn square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system steady state
is determined by the graphs of some functions of s which can be expressed explicitly
[5, 6].
The general geometric criterion: The occurrence of any possible stability
switching resulting from the increase of value of the time delay s for our single turn
square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system characteristic equation.
Pn ðk ¼ 0; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ 0; sÞ ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ q0 ðsÞ 6¼ 0 8 s 2 R þ 0
Pn ðk; sÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s for which we
assume:
(I) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R then Pn ði x; sÞ þ Qm ði x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R.
(II) lim supfjQm ðk; sÞ=Pn ðk; sÞj : jkj ! 1; Rek 0g\1 for any s.
(III) Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPn ði x; sÞj2 jQm ði x; sÞj2 for each s has at most a finite
number of real zeros.
(IV) Each positive root xðsÞ of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable in s
whenever it exists.
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 873
The helix antenna is a type of antenna which uses curved segments. The main
issues regarding helix antenna are helix geometry and parameters, wire connection
concepts, and the Perfect Electric Conductor (PEC) ground plane. A helical antenna
is an antenna consisting of a conducting wire wound in the form of a helix. Helical
antennas are mounted over a ground plane. The feed line is connected between the
bottom of the helix and the ground plane.
Helical antennas can operate in one of two principal modes—normal mode or
axial mode. In the normal mode or broad side helix, the dimensions of the helix are
small compared with the wavelength. The antenna acts similarly to an electrically
short dipole or monopole, and the radiation pattern has a maximum radiation at
right angles to the helix axis. Manly used for compact antennas for portable and
mobile two way radios, and for UHF broadcasting antennas. Additionally the
normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) is used for applications such as mobile and
satellite communication, RFID and medical devices. In the axial mode or end-fire
helix, the dimensions of the helix are comparable to a wavelength. The antenna
functions as a directional antenna radiating a beam off the ends of the helix, along
the antenna’s axis. It radiates circularly polarized radio waves and used for satellite
communications. The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) lumped-element
equivalent circuit is represented the input impedance of a normal mode helical
antenna. The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) is modeled as the combination
of a wire dipole antenna and distributed inductors. The equivalent circuit is divided
into two parts: a five element circuit for the equivalent wire antenna with a different
radius, and a three element sub-circuit representing the effects of the loops. The
geometry of a typical helix antenna is shown in the below figure. There are some
important parameters which characterize our helix antenna. The helix wire of
radius, a, and uniformly wound with a constant pitch, S. The diameter of the
imagined cylinder over which the axis of the helical conductor is wrapped is D and
the radius is R (D = 2 • R). The number of turns is N and the half axial length of the
antenna is h = N • S. We can modeled the helix antenna as a series of loops and
linear conductors when the physical dimensions of the helix are much smaller than
the wavelength [130–132]. We can represent each helix antenna turn as two radi-
ating components, one an axial wire segment of length S, and the other a loop of
diameter D. The wire and loop model can be representing as a short wire segments
connected by lumped elements representing the inductance of the loop, where the
loops are functioned as inductors (each one inductance L). Actually the helix
structure model is a wire segment with a length of S and one inductive element per
turn. We define new radius for the helix antenna wire segment (a0 ; a ! a0 ) since we
need to keep the correct capacitance of the helix turn (a0 ¼ S ðalÞ½ l ). The length of
S
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
helix antenna one turns, l where l ¼ ðp DÞ2 þ S2 . The induced magnetic field of
a single turn can be represented by an inductance Lseg , which includes the
874 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
self-inductance Lself of one turn and the mutual inductance Mseg coupled from two
adjacent turns Lseg ¼ Lself þ 2 Mseg (Fig. 8.13).
The Lself expression integrates the effects of pitch angle (a), l0 is the of free
space.
8R p l0 R4
Lself ¼ l0 R ½lnð Þ 2 cosðaÞ; Mseg ¼ pffiffiffi 3
a 2 ðR2 þ S2 Þ2
pffiffiffi
8R p l0 R4 2
Lseg ¼ l0 R ½lnðð Þ 2 cosðaÞ þ 3
a ðR2 þ S2 Þ2
The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) equivalent circuit is divided to two
parts: one modeling the equivalent wire antennas (five elements circuit) and the
other modeling the inductive loops (three elements circuit) (Fig. 8.14).
We define two resonance frequencies for our helix antenna equivalent circuit
(eight elements) f01 ðx01 Þ; f02 ðx02 Þ. Capacitor C0 is the antenna capacitance at fre-
quency below the first resonance frequency f01 ðx01 Þ. We select L0 to resonate with
C0 at the second resonant frequency f02 ðx02 Þ. Inductor L1 is chosen to resonate with
C1 at frequency f02 ðx02 Þ. We estimate C1, L1 and R1 at the first resonant frequency
f01 ðx01 Þ, the reactance of the antenna vanishes and the resistance is R0.
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 875
p e0 h 1 lnðah0 Þ 1 1 1 x01 1
C0 ¼ ; L0 ¼ ¼ ; A ¼ x01 L0 ¼ ½
lnðah0 Þ 1 x202 C0 x202 p e0 h x01 C0 C0 x202 x01
lnðah0 Þ 1 x01 1 A x01 R20 þ A2 x01 1
A¼ ½ 2 ; C1 ¼ 2 ð Þ; L1 ¼ ð 2 Þ
p e0 h x02 x01 R0 þ A2 x01 x02
2 2 A x02 x01
p ffiffi
ffi
R2 þ A2 Lseg R 8R p l0 R4 2
R1 ¼ 0 ; Lunit ¼ ¼ l0 ½lnð Þ 2 cosðaÞ þ 3
R0 S S a ðR2 þ S2 Þ2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
The axial wave number for the helical structure, k is k ¼ vxp ¼ k02 þ c2 , where
vp is the axial velocity of the wave in the helical structure, which is less than the
light velocity, k0 is a free space wave number, and c is the radial wave number. We
define factor F, which integrate k, h parameters [130, 131].
1 sin2 ðk hÞ h h Lseg
F ¼ 1þ ð 1Þ; L2 ¼ Lunit ¼
ð1 p2 Þ 1
2kh sinð2khÞ F F S
2kh
p2 l2 N 2 k02
ð 2 4c2 l2 N 2
Þ
4ð1 þ c2 Þ def
k 1þ
H ¼ Hðc; k0 ; l; N0 Þ ¼ 0 p2
;
ðp4 l2 N 2 k02 Þ
2
L
2 h=½Lunit p2 c2 2 h=½ Sseg p2 c2
C3 ¼ ¼
H H
The value of H varies significantly at low frequencies and changes little when k0
is sufficiently large near the resonance. A relationship between k0 and c can be
obtaining from the following expression:
c D 2 I0 ð 2 Þ K0 ð 2 Þ
cD cD
2 Lunit l2 N 2 1
ð Þ cD tan2
ðaÞ ¼ 1; L3 ¼ ðH Þ
k0 D I1 ð 2 Þ K1 ð 2 Þ
cD h 1þ
4l2 N 2 c2
def
p2
AR ¼ 2RSk
2 p2 . The typical normal mode helical antennas, the axial ratio is much
wire and inductor model is presented in the below figure (Fig. 8.15).
One application of Helix antenna is RFID antennas. We use it for identification
and tracking of objects using radio waves. RFID tags employ helical antennas
embedded in a dielectric material. The antenna is designed to resonate at around
ICrfic þ IRrfic þ IC0 ¼ 0 ðKCL @ A2 Þ; IC0 ¼ IL0 ; IC1 þ IR1 þ IL1 ¼ IL0 ðKCL @ A4 Þ
VA1 VA2 dðVA1 VA2 Þ
IC1 þ IR1 þ IL1 ¼ IC3 þ IL2 ðKCL @ A5 Þ; IL3 ¼ IC3 ; IRrfid ¼ ; ICrfid ¼ Crfid
Rrfid dt
dIL2 dIL3 dðVA6 VA5 Þ
VL2 ¼ VA1 VA5 ¼ L2 ; VL3 ¼ VA1 VA6 ¼ L3 ; IC3 ¼ C3
dt dt dt
V A5 V A4 dIL1 dðVA5 VA4 Þ
I R1 ¼ ; VL1 ¼ VA5 VA4 ¼ L1 ; IC1 ¼ C1
R1 dt dt
dIL0 dðVA3 VA2 Þ
VL0 ¼ VA4 VA3 ¼ L0 ; IC0 ¼ C0
dt dt
P
KVL : VAkl ¼ VAk VAl ; VAkl ¼ 0; k 6¼ l; k ¼ 1; 2; . . .; 6; l ¼ 1; 2; . . .; 6
d X 1 1 d 2 IL 1 d 2 IL
ð VAkl Þ ¼ 0 ) ICrfid I C0 L 0 2 0 I C1 L 2 2 2 ¼ 0
dt Crfid C0 dt C1 dt
Z
dIL2 1 dIL3
VA51 ¼ VA56 VA61 ) L2 ¼ IC3 dt þ L3 ;
dt C3 dt
d 2 I L2 1 d 2 IL
L2 ¼ I C 3 þ L3 2 3
dt2 C3 dt
dIR1 d 2 IL dIR
IC1 ¼ C1 R1 ; IC1 ¼ C1 L1 2 1 ; ICrfid ¼ Crfid Rrfid rfid
dt dt dt
2 2 2
d IL 1 d IL d IL R1 dIR1 dIL1 R1
L2 2 2 ¼ IC3 þ L3 2 3 ; 2 1 ¼ ; ¼ IR1
dt C3 dt dt L1 dt dt L1
1 1 d 2 IL 1 d 2 IL
ICrfid IC0 L0 2 0 IC1 L2 2 2 ¼ 0
Crfid C0 dt C1 dt
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 879
System differential equations (Ver.2): IC0 ¼ IL0 ; IL3 ¼ IC3 ; IL3 ! IC3
IC1 ¼ IL0 IR1 IL1 ; ICrfid ¼ IRrfid IC0 ¼ IRrfid IL0 ; IC0 ! IL0
dIR1 d 2 IL dIR
IL0 IR1 IL1 ¼ C1 R1 ; IL0 IR1 IL1 ¼ C1 L1 2 1 ; ICrfid ¼ Crfid Rrfid rfid
dt dt dt
d 2 IL2 1 d 2 IC3 dIL1 R1
L2 ¼ IC3 þ L3 2 ; ¼ IR1
dt2 C3 dt dt L1
1 1 d 2 IL 1 d 2 IL
ðIRrfid IL0 Þ IL0 L0 2 0 ðIL0 IR1 IL1 Þ L2 2 2 ¼ 0
Crfid C0 dt C1 dt
dIR1 1 1 1 d 2 IL
¼ I L0 IR 1 I L1 ; 2 1
dt C1 R1 C1 R1 C1 R1 dt
1 1 1
¼ IL IR1 IL
C1 L1 0 C1 L1 C1 L1 1
dIR1 1 1 1 dY1 1 1 1
¼ IL IR1 IL ; ¼ IL IR1 IL
dt C1 R1 0 C1 R1 C1 R1 1 dt C1 L1 0 C1 L1 C1 L1 1
dIRrfid 1 dIC
¼ ICrfid ; 3 ¼ Y3
dt Crfid Rrfid dt
1 1
IL0 ¼ IL1 ) IRrfid ¼ Crfid ð þ Þ IL0 ; IRrfid þ IL0 ¼ 0
Crfid C0
1 1
) ½1 Crfid ð þ Þ IL0 ¼ 0
Crfid C0
Stability analysis: The standard local stability analysis about any one of the
equilibrium points of helix antenna system consists in adding to its coordinated
[Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 IL0 IL1 IL2 IC1 IC3 IR1 ICrfid IRrfid ] arbitrarily small increments of exponential
terms ½y1 y2 y3 y4 iL0 iL1 iL2 iC1 iC3 iR1 iCrfid iRrfid ekt , and retaining the first order terms in
y1 y2 y3 y4 iL0 iL1 iL2 iC1 iC3 iR1 iCrfid iRrfid . The system of nine homogeneous equations leads
to a polynomial characteristic equation in the eigenvalue k. The polynomial char-
acteristic equation accepts by set the helix antenna system equations. The helix
antenna system fixed values with arbitrarily small increments of exponential form
½y1 y2 y3 y4 iL0 iL1 iL2 iC1 iC3 iR1 iCrfid iRrfid ekt are; i = 0 (first fixed point), i = 1 (second
fixed point), i = 2 (third fixed point), etc., [2–4].
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
Y1 ðtÞ ¼ Y1 þ y1 ekt ; Y2 ðtÞ ¼ Y2 þ y2 ekt ; Y3 ðtÞ ¼ Y3 þ y3 ekt ; Y4 ðtÞ ¼ Y4 þ y4 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
IL0 ðtÞ ¼ IL0 þ iL0 ekt ; IL1 ðtÞ ¼ IL1 þ iL1 ekt ; IC1 ðtÞ ¼ IC1 þ iC1 ekt ; IC3 ðtÞ ¼ IC3 þ iC3 ekt
ðiÞ ðiÞ ðiÞ
IR1 ðtÞ ¼ IR1 þ iR1 ekt ; ICrfid ðtÞ ¼ ICrfid þ iCrfid ekt ; IRrfid ðtÞ ¼ IRrfid þ iRrfid ekt
8.4 Helix Antennas System Stability Analysis Under Parameters Variation 881
&&&
dIR1 1 1 1
¼ IL IR1 IL
dt C1 R1 0 C1 R1 C1 R1 1
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
iR1 k ekt ¼ ½I þ iL0 ekt ½I þ iR1 ekt ½I þ iL1 ekt
C1 R1 L0 C1 R1 R1 C1 R1 L 1
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1
iR1 k ekt ¼ I I I þ iL ekt
C1 R1 L0 C1 R1 R1 C1 R1 L1 C1 R1 0
1 1
iR ekt iL ekt
C1 R1 1 C1 R1 1
1 1 1
iR1 k iR1 þ i L0 iL ¼ 0
C1 R1 C1 R1 C1 R1 1
dY1 1 1 1
¼ IL IR1 IL
dt C1 L1 0 C1 L1 C1 L1 1
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ
y1 k ekt ¼ ½I þ iL0 ekt ½I þ iR1 ekt ½I þ iL1 ekt
C1 L 1 L 0 C1 L1 R1 C1 L1 L1
1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1 ðiÞ 1
y1 k ekt ¼ I I I þ iL ekt
C1 L1 L0 C1 L1 R1 C1 L1 L1 C1 L1 0
1 1
iR ekt iL ekt
C1 L1 1 C1 L 1 1
1 1 1
y1 k þ i L0 iR1 iL ¼ 0
C1 L1 C1 L1 C1 L1 1
dIRrfid 1 1 ðiÞ
¼ ICrfid ; iRrfid k ekt ¼ ½I þ iCrfid ekt
dt Crfid Rrfid Crfid Rrfid Crfid
882 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
1 ðiÞ 1
iRrfid k ekt ¼ I þ iCrfid ekt
Crfid Rrfid Crfid Crfid Rrfid
ðiÞ
At fixed points: 1
Crfid Rrfid ICrfid ¼ 0; iRrfid k þ 1
Crfid Rrfid iCrfid ¼ 0
1 1 1 1 1 1
ðL2 y2 þ L0 y4 Þ k iR ð þ þ Þ i L0 þ iR þ iL
Crfid rfid Crfid C1 C0 C1 1 C1 1
¼0
L2 L0 ¼ L20
1 1 1 1 1 1
) ðy2 þ y4 Þ L20 k iRrfid ð þ þ Þ iL0 þ iR1 þ
Crfid Crfid C1 C0 C1 C1
i L1
¼0
1 1 1 1 1
y2 y4 ) y2 þ y4 2 y2 ) y2 k iR ð þ þ Þ iL0
2 L20 Crfid rfid 2 L20 Crfid C1 C0
1 1
þ iR þ iL ¼ 0
2 L20 C1 1 2 L20 C1 1
1 1 1 1 1
y2 y4 ) y2 þ y4 2 y4 ) y4 k iR ð þ þ Þ iL0
2 Crfid L20 rfid 2 L20 Crfid C1 C0
1 1
þ iR þ iL ¼ 0
2 C1 L20 1 2 C1 L20 1
0 1
iR1
B y C
B 1C
B C
B iRrfid C 0 1
0 1 B B C
C i11 i12 !
N11 . . . N19 B i C3 C B : : C
B .. .. .. C B B
C B
C C iCrfid
@ . . . A B i L1 C þ B C ¼0
B C @ : : A y3
N91 N99 B i L2 C
B C i91 i92
B iL C
B 0C
B C
@ y2 A
y4
884 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
!
iCrfid
Assumption: !e
y3
1 1 1
N11 ¼ k ; N12 ¼ N13 ¼ N14 ¼ 0; N15 ¼ ; N16 ¼ 0; N17 ¼ ; N18 ¼ N19 ¼ 0
C 1 R1 C 1 R1 C 1 R1
1 1 1
N21 ¼ ; N22 ¼ k; N23 ¼ N24 ¼ 0; N25 ¼ ; N26 ¼ 0; N27 ¼ ; N28 ¼ N29 ¼ 0
C 1 R1 C1 L1 C1 L1
N31 ¼ N32 ¼ 0; N33 ¼ k; N34 ¼ . . . ¼ N39 ¼ 0; N41 ¼ N42 ¼ N43 ¼ 0; N44 ¼ k
R1
N45 ¼ . . . ¼ N49 ¼ 0; N51 ¼ ; N52 ¼ N53 ¼ N54 ¼ 0; N55 ¼ k; N56 ¼ . . . ¼ N59 ¼ 0
L1
N61 ¼ . . . ¼ N65 ¼ 0; N66 ¼ k; N67 ¼ 0; N68 ¼ 1; N69 ¼ 0; N71 ¼ . . . ¼ N76 ¼ 0; N77 ¼ k
1 1 1
N78 ¼ 0; N79 ¼ 1; N81 ¼ ; N82 ¼ 0; N83 ¼ ; N84 ¼ 0; N85 ¼
2 L20 C1 2 L20 Crfid 2 L20 C1
1 1 1 1 1
N86 ¼ 0; N87 ¼ ð þ þ Þ; N88 ¼ k; N89 ¼ 0; N91 ¼
2 L20 Crfid C1 C0 2 L20 C1
1 1
N92 ¼ 0; N93 ¼ ; N94 ¼ 0; N95 ¼ ; N96 ¼ 0
2 Crfid L20 2 C1 L20
1 1 1 1
N97 ¼ ð þ þ Þ; N98 ¼ 0; N99 ¼ k
2 L20 Crfid C1 C0
1
i11 ¼ i12 ¼ i21 ¼ i22 ¼ 0; i31 ¼ ; i32 ¼ 0; i41 ¼ 0; i42 ¼ 1;
Crfid Rrfid
i51 ¼ i52 ¼ 0; i61 ¼ i62 ¼ 0
i71 ¼ i72 ¼ 0; i81 ¼ i82 ¼ 0; i91 ¼ i92 ¼ 0
0 1 0 1
N11 . . . N19 N11 ... N19
B .. .. .. C B .. .. .. C
AkI ¼@ . . . A; detðA k IÞ ¼ 0; det@ . . . A¼0
N91 N99 N91 N99
distinguished depending on the relative value of the real part of the complex
eigenvalues and of the real one, (5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a
negative real part and at least one eigenvalue is positive (unstable steady state).
Exercises
of the wire (S/m), Si —wire cross section area (p m2i ), mi —Radius of the wire.
1:1 Write system differential equations for cases: S1 in position (a) and S1 in
position (b).
1:2 Find system fixed points for the cases: S1 in position (a) and S1 in position
(b).
1:3 Discuss stability and stability switching for the simple case Dl1 ¼ 0, Dl2 ¼
0; Dl3 ¼ 0 Under variation of circuit parameters (switch S1 in position (a).
1:4 Discuss stability and stability switching for the cases: Dl 2 R þ
(1) Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ 0; Dl3 ¼ 0 (2) Dl1 ¼ 0; Dl2 ¼ Dl ; Dl3 ¼ Dl .
(3) Dl1 ¼ Dl3 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ 0 (4) Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ C Dl1 ; Dl3 ¼ 0;
C 2 Rþ
Under variation of Dl and C parameters (switch S1 in position (a)).
1:5 Return (1.3) and (1.4) for the case, switch S1 in position (b).
Remark: The delay is on the current that flow through microstrip line
IðtÞ ! Iðt Dl Þ, we consider that VDl ! e(neglect the voltage on
microstrip line). Take care in your analysis and calculation the mutual
inductances
P between each two N-turn multilayer circular antennas in our
system ( M ¼ M þ M ).
2. We have a system of three N-turn multilayer circular antennas in series, which
are integrated with RFID IC for complete RFID transponder system.
Additionally, there is a capacitors bridge (CA1, CA2, CA3, and CA4) which is
connected to our RFID transponder system and balance the circuit currents
flow. An N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas system is influenced by
electromagnetic interferences which affect their stability behavior but we
neglect it in our analysis. Additionally, microstrip lines in the system have a
parasitic effects, a delay lines Dl1 ; Dl2 and Dl3 respectively. We need to inspect
our system performance under microstrip lines (1, 2, and 3) parasitic affects.
Every N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna has a parasitic DC resistance
which needs to be calculated. Index (i) indicated the first N-turn multilayer
circular coil antenna (i = 1) or second N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna
Exercises 887
ak 6¼ al ; Nk 6¼ Nl ; hk 6¼ hl ; bk 6¼ bl ; k 6¼ l; k ¼ 1; 2; 3; l ¼ 1; 2; 3
ak ; Nk ; hk ; bk 2 R þ ; al ; Nl ; hl ; bl 2 R þ
l Ni 2 p ai Ni 2 ai Ni
RDCi ¼ ¼ ¼ :
ri Si ri Si ri m2i
lNi —Total length of the wire, ri —Conductivity of the wire (S/m), Si —wire
cross section area (p m2i ), mi —Radius of the wire.
Dl3 ¼ 0; C 2 R þ
Under variation of Dl and C parameters.
2:4 Bridge’s capacitor CA3 is disconnected. How it influences circuit behavior?
Find system differential equations, fixed points and discuss stability and
stability switching under parameters variations.
2:5 Bridge’s capacitor CA2 is shortened. How it influences circuit behavior?
Find system differential equations, fixed points and discuss stability and
stability switching under parameters variations.
Remark: The delay is on the current that flow through microstrip line
IðtÞ ! Iðt Dl Þ, we consider that VDl ! e(neglect the voltage on
microstrip line). Take care in your analysis and calculation the mutual
inductances
P between each two N-turn multilayer circular antennas in our
system ( M ¼ M þ M ).
3. We have a system of two N-turn multilayer circular antennas which can be
integrated with RFID IC for complete RFID transponder system. The first (i = 1)
and second (i = 2) N-turn multilayer circular antennas are connected by two
microstrip lines (1 and 2) and matching network. The matching network can be
Pi-type or T-type. Switch S1 has two positions: first position (a), RFID IC is
connected to first (i = 1) N-turn multilayer circular antenna through matching
network and microstrip line 1. The second (i = 2) N-turn multilayer circular
antenna is disconnected. Second position (b), RFID IC is connected to two N-turn
multilayer circular antennas. An N-turn multilayer circular coil antennas system is
influenced by electromagnetic interferences which affect their stability behavior
but we neglect it in our analysis. Additionally, microstrip lines in the system have
parasitic effects, a delay lines Dl1 ; Dl2 respectively. We need to inspect our system
performance under microstrip lines (1 and 2) parasitic affects. Every N-turn
multilayer circular coil antenna has a parasitic DC resistance which needs to be
calculated. Index (i) indicated the first N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna (i =
1) or second N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna (i = 2). We define RFID’s
N-turn multilayer coil antenna parameters, ai —Average radius of the coil in cm,
Ni —number of turns, bi —Winding thickness in cm, Si —wire cross section area,
mi —radius of the wire and hi —winding height in cm. Integrating all those
parameters give the equation for N-turn multilayer circular coil antenna induc-
2
i Ni Þ
tance calculation Lcalci (Lcalci ¼ 6a0:31ða
i þ 9hi þ 10bi
½lH ). The length of N turn is
lNi ¼ 2 p ai Ni (Assumption: ai bi ; ai þ bi ai ). Two N-turn multilayer
circuit coil antennas are not identical.
a1 6¼ a2 ; N1 6¼ N2 ; h1 6¼ h2 ; b1 6¼ b2 ; i ¼ 1; 2; ai ; Ni ; hi ; bi 2 R þ
Exercises 889
l Ni 2 p ai Ni 2 ai Ni
RDCi ¼ ¼ ¼ :
ri Si ri Si ri m2i
3:1 Write system differential equations for the cases: S1 in position (a) and S1 in
position (b). Matching network is T-type.
3:2 Find system fixed points for the cases: S1 in position (a) and S1 in position
(b). Matching network is T-type.
3:3 Discuss stability and stability switching for the simple case Dl1 ¼ 0; Dl2 ¼
0 under variation of circuit parameters. Switch S1 is in (a) position.
Matching network is T-type.
3:4 Return (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3) for the case we use Pi-type matching network.
3:5 How the circuit dynamic is changed if switch S1 is in (b) position? Return
(3.3) for the case that switch S1 is in position (b).
3:6 Return (3.3) for the case Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ C Dl ; C; Dl 2 R þ . Discuss
stability and stability switching for variation of C; Dl parameters.
Remark: The delay is on the current that flow through microstrip line
IðtÞ ! Iðt Dl Þ, we consider that VDl ! e(neglect the voltage on
microstrip line). Take care in your analysis and calculation the mutual
inductances
P between two N-turn multilayer circular antennas in our system
( M ¼ M þ M ).
4. We have a system of double rectangular spiral antennas which are connected in
parallel through microstrip lines and discrete components. The antennas are
890 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
l0 X
4
Lcalci ¼ ð Xki X3 Þ NciPi ;
p k¼1;k6¼3
2 Aavgi Bavgi
X1i ¼ Aavgi lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ
di ðAavgi þ A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ
2 Aavgi Bavgi
X2i ¼ Bavgi lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ;
di ðBavgi þ A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ
The rectangular spiral antenna length is calculated as follows: l0i is the length of
the first turn l0i ¼ 2 ðA0i þ B0i Þ ðwi þ gi Þ. lk is the length of turn k + 1.
We define the following:
NX
ci 1
NX
C 1 NX
C 1
lTi lTi
RDCi ¼ ¼ :
ri Si ri p a2i
4:1 Write system differential equations and find fixed points for the following
cases: s; D; Dl 2 R þ
(1) s1 ¼ s; s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D; D2 ¼ 0; Dl1 ¼ Dl2 ¼ 0.
(2) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ 0; Dl1 ¼ Dl2 ¼ Dl .
(3) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ 0; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D; Dl1 ¼ Dl ; Dl2 ¼ 0.
(4) s1 ¼ s2 ¼ s; D1 ¼ D2 ¼ D; Dl1 ¼ 0; Dl2 ¼ Dl .
892 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
4:2 Discuss system stability and stability switching under variation of param-
eters s; D; Dl for all cases in (4.1).
4:3 We short inductor La, How it influences our system dynamics and stability.
Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of Ca1 and Ca2.
4:4 We short capacitor Ca1, How it influences our system dynamic and sta-
bility? Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of La.
4:5 We short capacitor Ca2, How it influences our system dynamic and sta-
bility? Discuss stability and stability switching for different values of Ca1.
Remark: The delay is on the current that flow through microstrip line
IðtÞ ! Iðt Dl Þ, we consider that VDl ! e (neglect the voltage on
microstrip line). Take care in your analysis and calculation the mutual
inductances
P between double rectangular spiral antennas in our system
( M ¼ M þ M ).
5. We have a system of double rectangular spiral antennas which are connected
through switch S1 to RFID IC. The antennas are integrated with RFID IC and
discrete components (Ca1 ; Ca2 ; La ; Lb ) to complete RFID transponder system.
A double rectangular spiral antennas system influences by electromagnetic
interferences which effect there stability behavior. Additionally, microstrip lines
which are connect antennas to RFID IC and have parasitic effects, delays in
time Dl1 ; Dl2 respectively. We inspect our system performances under elec-
tromagnetic interferences and microstrip lines parasitic effects. Every rectan-
gular spiral antenna has a parasitic DC resistance which needs to be calculated.
Index (i) indicates first rectangular spiral antenna (i = 1) or second rectangular
spiral antenna (i = 2).
Exercises 893
l0 X
4
Lcalci ¼ ð Xki X3 Þ NciPi ;
p k¼1;k6¼3
2 Aavgi Bavgi
X2i ¼ Bavgi lnð qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Þ;
di ðBavgi þ A2avgi þ B2avgi Þ
The rectangular spiral antenna length is calculated as follows: l0i is the length of
the first turn l0i ¼ 2 ðA0i þ B0i Þ ðwi þ gi Þ. lk is the length of turn k + 1.
We define the following:
NX
ci 1
NX
C 1 NX
C 1
lTi lTi
RDCi ¼ ¼ :
ri Si ri p a2i
2 li wi þ zi
Li ¼ 0:002 li fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g½lH ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 7
w i þ zi 3 li
wi 6¼ wj ; li 6¼ lj zi 6¼ zj ðj 6¼ i; j ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 7; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 7Þ:
Consider in your analysis the DC resistivity qi of the straight thin film strip
material and the strip cross section Ai ¼ wi zi ; Ri ¼ wqii lzii . The dimension of the
straight thin film strip that affects the inductance most strongly is the length li .
The width wi has much weaker influence, and straight thin film strip thickness
can be neglected completely for the limit (zi wi ). This is in contrast to the
resistance Ri ¼ wqii lzii , which is inversely proportional to the straight thin film strip
896 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
cross section wi zi and depends on the material properties via its resistivity qi .
The length of each straight thin film strip in our system is not the same to each
other. Microstrip line in our system is represented as a delay line and the delay
is on the current that flows through the microstrip line (s1 ; s2 ; . . .) respectively
(Vsi ! e; i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; A ! 1; B ! 2; . . .).
6:1 Find the expression of system total inductance (LT) which constructed from
the sum of the self-inductances
P of all straight segments and the sum of all
mutual inductances ( M), both negative and positive).
6:2 We short straight segment number 5, find the expression of system total
inductance (LT) which constructed from the sum of the self-inductances
P of
all straight segments and the sum of all mutual inductances ( M), both
negative and positive).
6:3 Find system differential equations and fixed points for (6.1) and (6.2).
6:4 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of system param-
eters (simple case: no delays s1 ¼ s2 ¼ ¼ 0).
6:5 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of delay parameter
s (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ ¼ s).
7. We have system of almost two turn square planar straight thin film inductors
antenna (six segments). The system is constructed from six straight thin film
inductors which are connected in almost two turn square structure. The straight
thin film inductors are connected by microstrip lines (A, B, C… E). The almost
two turns square planar straight thin film inductors antenna system is connected
to transceiver module (represent as a transceiver mixer output equivalent circuit)
through capacitor bridge (Ca ; Cb ; Cc ; Cd ) and two microstrip lines (F and G).
Index (i) stands for straight thin film inductor in place (i). wi is the width of
straight thin film inductor (i) in cm, zi is the thickness of straight thin film
inductor (i) in cm, and li is the length of straight thin film conductor (inductor) in
cm. The calculated inductance of straight thin film inductor (i) is as follow (Li is
the segment inductance in lH):
2 li wi þ zi
Li ¼ 0:002 li fln½ þ 0:50049 þ g ½lH ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 7
wi þ zi 3 li
wi 6¼ wj ; li 6¼ lj zi 6¼ zj ðj 6¼ i; j ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 6; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; 4; . . .; 6Þ:
Consider in your analysis the DC resistivity qi of the straight thin film strip
material and the strip cross section Ai ¼ wi zi ; Ri ¼ wqii lzii . The dimension of the
straight thin film strip that affects the inductance most strongly is the length li . The
width wi has much weaker influence, and straight thin film strip thickness can be
neglected completely for the limit (zi wi ). This is in contrast to the resistance
Exercises 897
Ri ¼ wqii lzii , which is inversely proportional to the straight thin film strip cross
section wi zi and depends on the material properties via its resistivity qi . The
length of each straight thin film strip in our system is not the same to each other.
Microstrip line in our system is represented as a delay line and the delay is on
the current that flows through the microstrip line (s1 ; s2 ; . . .) respectively
(Vsi ! e; i ¼ 1; 2; . . .; A ! 1; B ! 2; . . .).
7:1 Find the expression of system total inductance (LT) which constructed from
the sum of the self-inductances
P of all straight segments and the sum of all
mutual inductances ( M), both negative and positive).
898 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
7:2 We short straight segment number 5, find the expression of system total
inductance (LT) which constructed from the sum of the self-inductances
P of
all straight segments and the sum of all mutual inductances ( M), both
negative and positive).
7:3 Find system differential equations and fixed points for (7.1) and (7.2).
7:4 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of system param-
eters (simple case: no delays s1 ¼ s2 ¼ ¼ 0).
7:5 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of delay parameter
s (s1 ¼ s2 ¼ ¼ s).
8. We have a system of two helical antennas which are connected to RFID IC
through capacitors network (Ca ; Ca1 ; Ca2 ). The dimensional parameters of
helical antennas are hi ; Si ; ai ; Ri ; Di ; i ¼ 1; 2 (hi ; Si ; ai ; Ri ; Di 2 R þ ). We define
the mathematical relationships between helical antennas parameters as follow:
R2 ¼ C1 R1 ; S2 ¼ S1 C2 þ S1 C22
pffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
h2 ¼ C3 h1 ; aa12 ¼ C1 þ C2 ; C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ . The two helical antennas are
not identical. The length of helix antenna on turns, li where
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
li ¼ ðp Di Þ2 þ S2i ; i ¼ 1; 2. The induced magnetic field of a single turn can
be represented by an inductance LsegðiÞ , which includes the self-inductance
Lself ðiÞ of one turn and the mutual inductance MsegðiÞ coupled from two adjacent
turns LsegðiÞ ¼ Lself ðiÞ þ 2 MsegðiÞ . The Lself ðiÞ expression integrates the effects of
pitch angel (ai ), l0 is the permeability of free space.
Exercises 899
8Ri p l0 R4i
Lself ðiÞ ¼ l0 Ri ½lnð Þ 2 cosðai Þ; MsegðiÞ ¼ pffiffiffi 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai 2 ðR2i þ S2i Þ2
pffiffiffi
8Ri p l0 R4i 2
LsegðiÞ ¼ l0 Ri ½lnð Þ 2 cosðai Þ þ 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai ðR2 þ S2 Þ2
i i
The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) equivalent circuit is divided to two
parts: one modeling the equivalent wire antenna (five elements circuit) and the
other modeling the inductive loops (three elements circuit). In your system
analysis use the helical antenna equivalent circuit with eight frequency inde-
pendent elements.
Lself ð1Þ
8:1 Find the ratio Lself ð2Þ as a function of parameters C1, C2 and C3. Draw 3D
L ð1Þ
graph, Z-axis (Lself
self ð2Þ
), Y-axis (C1) and X-axis (C2) for the case C2 = C3.
Lself ð2Þ
8:2 Find the ratio Lself ð1Þ as a function of parameters C1, C2 and C3. Draw 3D
L ð2Þ
graph, Z-axis (Lself
self ð1Þ
), Y-axis (C2) and X-axis (C3) for the case C1 = C2.
8:3 Write system differential equations and find fixed points.
8:4 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of parameters C1,
C2 and C3 (C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ ).
8:5 We have a simple case C ¼ C1 ¼ C2 ¼ C3 , discuss stability and stability
switching under variation of C parameter C 2 R þ .
Remark: Take care in your analysis and calculation
P the mutual inductances
between helical antennas in our system ( M ¼ M þ M ).
9. We have a system of two helical antennas which are connected to RFID IC
through capacitors and inductor network (La ; Ca1 ; Ca2 ) and selective switch S1
(positions a, b). The dimensional parameters of helical antennas are
hi ; Si ; ai ; Ri ; Di ; i ¼ 1; 2 (hi ; Si ; ai ; Ri ; Di 2 R þ ). We define the mathematical
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
relationships between helical antennas parameters as follow: R2 ¼ C1
pffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffi
R1 ; S2 ¼ S1 C2 þ S1 C22 ; h2 ¼ C3 h1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
p ffiffiffiffiffi
ffi
a2 ¼ C1 þ C2 ; C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ . The two helical antennas are not identical.
a1
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
The length of helix antenna on turns, li where li ¼ ðp Di Þ2 þ S2i ; i ¼ 1; 2.
The induced magnetic field of a single turn can be represented by an inductance
LsegðiÞ , which includes the self-inductance Lself ðiÞ of one turn and the mutual
inductance MsegðiÞ coupled from two adjacent turns LsegðiÞ ¼ Lself ðiÞ þ 2 MsegðiÞ .
The Lself ðiÞ expression integrates the effects of pitch angel (ai ), l0 is the per-
meability of free space.
900 8 Antennas System Stability Analysis
8Ri p l0 R4i
Lself ðiÞ ¼ l0 Ri ½lnð Þ 2 cosðai Þ; MsegðiÞ ¼ pffiffiffi 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai 2 ðR2i þ S2i Þ2
pffiffiffi
8Ri p l0 R4i 2
LsegðiÞ ¼ l0 Ri ½lnð Þ 2 cosðai Þ þ 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai ðR2 þ S2 Þ2
i i
The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) equivalent circuit is divided to two
parts: one modeling the equivalent wire antenna (five elements circuit) and the
other modeling the inductive loops (three elements circuit). In your system
analysis use the helical antenna equivalent circuit with eight frequency inde-
pendent elements.
9:1 Write system differential equations and find fixed points, S1 in a position.
9:2 Write system differential equations and find fixed points, S1 in b position.
9:3 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of parameters C1,
C2 and C3 (C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ ).
9:4 We disconnected capacitor Ca1, how it influences our system behavior?
Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of C parameter
pffiffiffiffi
(C1 ¼ C; C2 ¼ C2 ; C3 ¼ C 2 R þ ).
9:5 We short capacitor Ca2, how it influences our system behavior? Discuss
stability and stability switching for different values of C parameter
Exercises 901
p ffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
(C1 ¼ C þ 1; C2 ¼ C2 ; C3 ¼ C 2 R þ ).
3
8Ri p l0 R4i
Lself ðiÞ ¼ l0 Ri ½lnð Þ 2 cosðai Þ; MsegðiÞ ¼ pffiffiffi 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai 2 ðR2i þ S2i Þ2
pffiffiffi
8Ri p l0 R4i 2
LsegðiÞ ¼ l0 Ri ½lnð Þ 2 cosðai Þ þ 3 ; i ¼ 1; 2
ai ðR2 þ S2 Þ2
i i
The normal mode helical antenna (NMHA) equivalent circuit is divided to two
parts: one modeling the equivalent wire antenna (five elements circuit) and the
other modeling the inductive loops (three elements circuit). In your system
analysis use the helical antenna equivalent circuit with eight frequency inde-
pendent elements.
10:1 Write system differential equations and find fixed points, S1 in a position.
10:2 Write system differential equations and find fixed points, S1 in b position.
10:3 Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of parameters C1,
C2 and C3 (C1 ; C2 ; C3 2 R þ ).
10:4 We disconnected capacitor Ca3, how it influences our system behavior?
Discuss stability and stability switching under variation of C parameter
p ffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
(C1 ¼ C2 ; C2 ¼ C2 ; C3 ¼ C 2 R þ ).
3
10:5 We short capacitor Ca2, how it influences our system behavior? Discuss
stability and stability switching for different values of C parameter
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi p ffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
(C1 ¼ C þ 1; C2 ¼ C2 ; C3 ¼ C 2 R þ ).
3
Remark: Take care in your analysis and calculation P the mutual induc-
tances between helical antennas in our system ( M ¼ M þ M ).
Chapter 9
Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits
Bifurcation Behavior, Investigation,
Comparison and Conclusion
interval only one future state follows from the current state. A RF and microwave
dynamical system is a phase (or state) space endowed with a family of smooth
evolution functions that for any element of time (t), map a point of the phase space
back into the phase space. RF and microwave systems can be described by num-
bers. The state vector is a numerical description of the current configuration of a
system. For example, RFID circuit with RFID IC and antenna (inductance element)
can be described using some numbers: its voltages (V1 ; V2 ; V3 ; . . .) and currents
(I1 ; I2 ; I3 ; . . .). Once we know these numbers V1 ; V2 ; V3 ; . . . and I1 ; I2 ; I3 ; . . . the
voltages and currents trajectories are completely determined. The group of numbers
(V1 ; V2 ; V3 ; . . ., I1 ; I2 ; I3 ; . . .) is a vector which completely describes the state of our
RF and microwave system and hence is called the state vector system. There are
two main behaviors which are related to RF and microwave systems: (1) the system
gravitates toward a fixed point, or (2) the system blowup. There are additional cases
of oscillators related to RF and microwave system. We assume fi ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . . are
differentiable with continuous derivatives. The vectors Vi are the state of the
microwave and RF dynamical system, and the functions fi ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . . tell us
how the system moves. In special circumstances, however, the system does not
move. The system can be stuck (we will say fixed) in a special state; we call these
states fixed points of the dynamical RF and microwave system. Not all fixed points
are the same. We call some stable and others unstable. Is the specific fixed point
Vi ; Ii stable or unstable? The answer is, neither. To see that it is not stable, consider
any points Vi0 ; Ii0 near (but not equal to) Vi ; Ii (i = 1, 2, 3…). At t ! 1 the RF
system never approaches (Vi ; Ii ). Further, Vi ; Ii are not unstable. To be unstable,
points near Vi ; Ii must be sent “far” away from Vi ; Ii . Clearly, if we start at certain
distance from Vi ; Ii the system does not get any farther away. Stable fixed points
give excellent information about the fate of a dynamical system.
In our analysis we investigate RF and microwave circuits bifurcation and dy-
namical behavior. Bifurcation behavior in our RF system is the study of changes in
the qualitative or topological structure of RF system, vector fields, and the solutions
of a family of differential equations. A bifurcation occurs when a small smooth
change made to the parameter values (the bifurcation parameters) of a RF and
microwave system causes a sudden topological change in behavior. Bifurcations
occur in both our continuous RF systems (ODEs, DDEs, and PDEs) and discrete
systems (described by maps). We can inspect in our microwave and RF system two
principal bifurcation classes: local bifurcation, which our RF system can be ana-
lyzed through changes in the local stability properties of equilibria, periodic orbits
or other invariant sets as parameters cross through critical thresholds. Global
bifurcations, which often occur in RF and microwave system happened when larger
invariant sets of the system collide with each other, or with equilibria of the system.
They cannot be detected only by stability analysis (fixed points). A local bifurcation
occurs when a system parameter change causes the stability of an equilibrium (or
fixed point) to change. In continuous system, this corresponds to the real part of an
eigenvalue of an equilibrium passing through zero. Global bifurcations occur when
larger invariant sets, such as periodic orbits, collide with equilibria. This causes
906 9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation …
changes in the topology of the trajectories in the phase space which cannot be
confined to a small neighborhood (local bifurcation). The changes in system
topology extend out to an arbitrarily large distance. In our analysis we pay attention
to the co-dimension of a bifurcation which is the number of parameters which must
be varied for the bifurcation to occur. The co-dimension of the parameter set for
which the bifurcation occurs within the full space of RF system parameters. The
simple case for stability analysis is when there are no time delay elements in our RF
and microwave system (s1 ¼ 0; s2 ¼ 0; s3 ¼ 0; . . .; D1 ¼ 0; D2 ¼ 0; D3 ¼ 0; . . .;
Dli ¼ 0; i ¼ 1; 2:3; . . .).
If our RF and microwave system involving Na variables (Na > 2), the charac-
P a k
teristic equation is of degree Na ( Nk¼0 k Pk ¼ 0) and must often be solved
numerically. Expect in some particular cases, such an equation has Na distinct roots
that can be real or complex. These values are the eigenvalues of the Na Na
Jacobian matrix (A). The general rule is that the Steady State (SS) is stable if there
is no eigenvalue with positive real part. It is sufficient that one eigenvalue is positive
for the steady state to be unstable. Our Na-variables RF and microwave system has
Na eigenvalues. The type of behavior can be characterized as a function of the
position of these eigenvalues in the Re/Im plane. Five non-degenerated cases can be
distinguished: (1) the Na eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state),
(2) the Na eigenvalues are real, Na − 1 of them are negative (unstable steady state),
(3) and (4) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a negative real part and the
other eigenvalues are real and negative (stable steady state), two cases can be
distinguished depending on the relative value of the real part of the complex
eigenvalues and of the real one, (5) two eigenvalues are complex conjugates with a
negative real part and at least one eigenvalue is positive (unstable steady state). The
next case is when there are delay elements in our RF and microwave system and we
can’t neglect them. In that case, our RF and microwave system stability analysis is
related to two main cases: first case, RF or microwave system is characterized by a
set of voltages (V1 ; V2 ; V3 ; :. . .) or/and currents (I1 ; I2 ; I3 ; . . .). Due to electromag-
netic interferences there are differences in time delays with respect to system
voltages and current variables
which can be expressed explicitly and thus can be easily depicted by software. f
need to look at one such function and locate the zeros. The stability switching is due
to different values of delay parameters s1 ; s2 ; s3 ; . . . or/and D1 ; D2 ; D3 ; . . .. Second
case, RF and microwave circuits include microstrip lines. Microstrip lines have
parasitic effects, a delay in time Dli ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . .. The delays are on the current
that flow through microstrip lines IðtÞ ! Iðt Dli Þ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . .. We consider
VDli ! e (neglect the voltage on microstrip lines). We inspect the stability behavior
and stability switching under variation of delay parameters Dli ; i ¼ 1; 2; 3; . . .. In
our RF and microwave systems which include antennas (inductances elements), we
take care in our analysis
P and calculation the mutual inductances between antennas
within the system ( M ¼ M þ M ).
If we minimize our RF and microwave system to specific case where there is
only one time delay parameter s then the general geometric criterion: The occur-
rence of any possible stability switching resulting from the increase of value of the
time delay s for our RF and microwave system characteristic equation.
Pn ðk ¼ 0; sÞ þ Qm ðk ¼ 0; sÞ ¼ p0 ðsÞ þ q0 ðsÞ 6¼ 0 8 s 2 R þ 0
Pn ðk; sÞ; Qm ðk; sÞ are analytic functions in k and differentiable in s for which we
assume (Pn ðk; sÞ ! P; Qm ðk; sÞ ! Q):
(I) If k ¼ i x; x 2 R then Pn ði x; sÞ þ Qm ði x; sÞ 6¼ 0; s 2 R.
(II) lim supfjQm ðk; sÞ=Pn ðk; sÞj : jkj ! 1; Rek 0g\1 for any s.
(III) Fðx; sÞ ¼ jPn ði x; sÞj2 jQm ði x; sÞj2 for each s has at most a finite
number of real zeros.
(IV) Each positive root xðsÞ of Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 is continuous and differentiable in s
whenever it exists.
In addition, since the coefficients in P and Q are real, we have
Pði xÞ ¼ Pði xÞ, and Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ thus k ¼ i x, x [ 0 may be on
eigenvalue of characteristic equation. The analysis consists in identifying the roots
of characteristic equation situated on the imaginary axis of the complex k—plane,
where by increasing the parameters of RF and microwave system, Re k may, at the
crossing Change its sign from (−) to (+), i.e. from a stable focus Eð0Þ to an unstable
one, or vice versa. This feature may be further assessed by examining the sign of
the partial derivatives with respect to s and RF/Microwave system parameters
[2, 3].
908 9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation …
1 @Rek
^ ðsÞ ¼ ;
@s k¼ix
Other RF and microwave parameters ¼ const where x 2 R þ :
PN
Hence Fðx; sÞ ¼ 0 implies k¼0 N2k x
2k
¼ 0 ; N 2 Z þ when writing
PðkÞ ¼ PR ðkÞ þ i PI ðkÞ and QðkÞ ¼ QR ðkÞ þ i QI ðkÞ, and inserting k ¼ i x into
RF system’s characteristic equation, x must satisfy the following:
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin x s ¼ gðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos x s ¼ hðxÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QI ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QR ði xÞ
sin hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
PR ði xÞ QR ði xÞ þ PI ði xÞ QI ði xÞ
cos hðsÞ ¼
jQði xÞj2
And the relation between the argument hðsÞ and xðsÞ s for s 2 I must be
xðsÞ s ¼ hðsÞ þ n 2 p 8 n 2 N0 . Hence we can define the maps sn : I ! R þ 0
þ n2p
given by sn ðsÞ ¼ hðsÞxðsÞ ; n 2 N0 ; s 2 I. Let us introduce the functions I ! R ;
Sn ðsÞ ¼ s sn ðsÞ; s 2 I; n 2 N0 that are continuous and differentiable in s. In the
following, the subscripts k; x; R1 ; C1 and RF microwave parameters indicate the
corresponding partial derivatives. Let us first concentrate on, ^ðxÞ remember in
k ðparametersÞ; x ðparametersÞ, and keeping all parameters except one (x) and s.
The derivation closely follows that in reference [BK]. Differentiating RF system
characteristic equation PðkÞ þ QðkÞ eks ¼ 0 with respect to specific parameter
(x), and inverting the derivative, for convenience, one calculates:
9 Microwave RF Antennas and Circuits Bifurcation … 909
where Pk ¼ @P
@k ; :. . . etc., Substituting k ¼ i x, and bearing Pði xÞ ¼ Pði xÞ,
Qði xÞ ¼ Qði xÞ then i Pk ði xÞ ¼ Px ði xÞ and i Qk ði xÞ ¼ Qx ði xÞ
that on the surface jPði xÞj2 ¼ jQði xÞj2 , one obtains
1 !
@k i Px ði x; xÞ Pði x; xÞ þ i Qk ði x; xÞ Qðk; xÞ s jPði x; xÞj2
jk¼ix ¼
@x Px ði x; xÞ Pði x; xÞ Qx ði x; xÞ Qði x; xÞ
@Rek
^1 ðsÞ ¼ ;
@s k¼ix
( )
1 2 ½U þ s jPj2 þ i Fx
^ ðsÞ ¼ Re ;
Fs þ i 2 ½V þ x jPj2
@x Fs
¼ xs ¼
@s Fx
@Rek
signf^1 ðsÞg ¼ sign ;
@s k¼ix
( )
1 @x U @x
@s þ V
signf^ ðsÞg ¼ signfFx g sign s þxþ
@s jPj2
− to +, i.e. from a stable focus E(*) to an unstable one, or vice versa. This feature
may be further assessed by examining the sign of the partial derivatives with respect
tos, ^1 ðsÞ ¼ ð@ Re
@s Þk¼ix :
k
of Liapunov. The target of analogy and RF filtering is to modify the magnitude and
phase of signal frequency components. Many analogy or Radio Frequency
(RF) circuits perform filtering on the signal passing through them. A diplexer is a
passive device that implements frequency domain multiplexing. We analyse BPF
diplexer circuit stability by using geometric stability switch criteria in delay dif-
ferential systems. There are lattice crystal filter, half lattice and cascaded half lattice
filters. A tunable BPF employing varactor diodes is ideal for many diverse wireless
applications. BPF (varactor diodes) circuit involving N variables and stability
behaviour is inspected. An antenna is a conductor or group of conductors used for
radiating electromagnetic energy into space or collecting electromagnetic energy
from space. There are many types of antennas and the operation at microwave
frequencies is inspected for the best performances. N—turn multilayer circular coil
antennas with RFID IC is investigated and stability optimization under delayed
electromagnetic interference and parasitic effects is analysed. Double rectangular
spiral antennas are constructed from two antennas and they are connected in series
with microstrip lines and RFID IC. A system of single turn square planar straight
thin film inductors antenna is constructed from four straight thin film inductors
which are connected in a single turn square structure. A Helical antenna is an
antenna consisting of a conducting wire wound in the form of a helix. Helix antenna
system stability is inspected under parameters variation.
Appendix A
RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz
Design and Analysis
We have RFID Antenna system on a substrate, width 300 lm and lr = 450. The
antenna is constructed from silver ointment which his resistance is bigger than pure
silver by 50 %. Track width is 20 lm, gap between tracks 20 lm, track depth is
20 lm up to 100 lm. The requested antenna inductance is 2.66 mH and parasitic
resistance less than 10 X. We need to find the number of rectangular spiral
antenna’s turn (Nc). Since the RFID antenna substrate permeability is 450 (lr =
450), RFID antenna permeability is average value between air permeability and the
magnet. We consider that the TAG permeability is 100–300 (lr). Possible TAG
dimensions: 5 mm 5 mm, 6 mm 6 mm, 7 mm 7 mm, 8 mm 8 mm and
permeability 100, 200, 300 (lr) (Fig. A.1).
Part A: Analysis for l = l0 and l = lr l0 (lr = 450).
H H
l0 ¼ 4 p 107 1:2566 106 ;
m m
l
lr ¼ ) l ¼ lr l0 jlr ¼450 ¼ 450 1:2566 106 ¼ 565:47 106
l0
ðt þ wÞ ð20 lm þ 20 lmÞ
t ¼ g ¼ 20 lm ) d ¼ 2 ¼2 ¼ 25:47 lm; t ¼ 20 lm
P 3:14
5 mm
0.3 mm
5 mm
k ¼ 1 ) L1 ¼ A0 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 2 ðw þ gÞ þ A0 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 3 ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 2 ) L2 ¼ A0 3 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 4 ðw þ gÞ þ A0 4 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 5 ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 3 ) L3 ¼ A0 5 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 6 ðw þ gÞ þ A0 6 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 7 ðw þ gÞ
X
N c 1
LT ¼ L0 þ fA0 ½1 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½3 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞg
916 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
Table A.2 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc for different values of Nc and l
Nc l = l0; lr = 1 Lcalc (5 mm 5 mm) − [H] Lcalc (8 mm 8 mm) − [H]
10 l0 = 1.25.66 (1e−6)H/m 1.085 lH 1.98 lH
20 l0 3.38 lH 6.48 lH
30 l0 6.21 lH 12.5 lH
60 l0 1.35 lH 34.6 lH
100 l0 10.025 lH 55.7 lH
150 l0 −1.37 1e−5H (N/A) 50.7 lH
120 l0 1.35 lH 61 lH
170 l0 −3.97 1e−5H (N/A) 33 lH
200 l0 −1.0582 1e−4H (N/A) NaN
220 l0 −1.7096 1e−4H (N/A) −1.9 1e−5H (N/A)
250 l0 −3.059 1e−4H (N/A) −9.19 1e−5H (N/A)
Nc l = lr l0; lr = 450 Lcalc (5 mm 5 mm) − [H] Lcalc (8 mm 8) − [H]
10 565.47 (1e−6)H/m 0.48 mH 0.89 mH
20 565.47 (1e−6)H/m 1.5 mH 2.9 mH
30 565.47 (1e−6)H/m 2.8 mH 5.7 mH
60 565.47 (1e−6)H/m 6.1 mH 15.6 mH
100 565.47 (1e−6)H/m 4.5 mH 26 mH
150 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.0062 N/A 22.8 mH
120 565.47 (1e−6)H/m 0.611 mH 27.5 mH
170 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.0179 N/A 14.9 mH
200 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.0476 N/A NaN
220 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.0769 N/A −0.0088 N/A
250 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.1377 N/A −0.0414 N/A
fA0 ½1 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½3 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞg
NX
C 1
¼ f2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ 8 k ðw þ gÞg
k¼1
NX
C 1
¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ðNC 1Þ 8 ðw þ gÞ k; k ¼ NC 1
k¼1 k¼1
X
N c 1
fA0 ½1 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½3 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞg
¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ðNC 1Þ 8 ðw þ gÞ ðNC 1Þ
¼ 2 ðNC 1Þ ½A0 þ B0 4 ðw þ gÞ
Final result:
LT ¼ L0 þ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ NC ðw þ gÞ ð8 NC 7Þ
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ðw þ gÞ þ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ NC ðw þ gÞ ð8 NC 7Þ
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½1 þ 8 NC 7
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½8 NC 6
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3
LT ¼ 2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3g
918 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r S r p a2
LT LT 2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
rS rpa 2 r p a2
6
A0 þ B0 ¼ 0:01 m; NC ¼ 30; w þ g ¼ 40 10 ) LT ¼ 0:6106 m ¼ 61:06 cm
S ¼ 20 lm 20 lm ¼ 400 1012 m2
The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm x.
0:6106
\10 ) x [ 4:846 105 m ¼ 48:46 lm; RDC@t¼20 lm
6:3 107 20 106 x
¼ 24:23 X
Actually the track is a mixture of silver then the conductivity is half of silver
conductivity.
Conclusion: In case of pure silver track. The track depth needs to be bigger than
48.46 lm to meet inductance resistance less than 10 X. In case of mixture of silver
then track depth needs to be bigger than 96.92 lm.
Part B: Analysis for l = lr l0 (lr = 100, 200, 300) (Table A.3).
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 919
Results: The most close inductance analysis to 2.66 mH is 2.7 mH and subcases
Result B.1: Lcalc = 2.7 mH, Nc = 60, (A0 = 7 mm) (B0 = 7 mm); l = lr
l0; lr = 100
l = 125.66 (1e−6)H/m.
The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna:
LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r S r p a2
LT LT 2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
r S r p a2 r p a2
6
A0 þ B0 ¼ 0:014 m; NC ¼ 60; w þ g ¼ 40 10 ) LT ¼ 1:689 m
The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm x.
1:689
\10 ) x [ 1:3405 104 m ¼ 134:05lm;
6:3 107 20 106 x
RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 67 X
Actually the track is a mixture of silver then the conductivity is half of silver
conductivity.
Result B.2: Lcalc= 2.7 mH, Nc = 60, (A0 = 5 mm) (B0 = 5 mm); l = lr l0;
lr = 200
l = 251.32 (1e−6)H/m.
Table A.3 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc for different values of Nc and l and tag overall dimension
920
LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r S r p a2
LT LT 2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
r S r p a2 r p a2
A0 þ B0 ¼ 0:01 m; NC ¼ 60; w þ g ¼ 40 106 ) LT ¼ 1:201 m
S ¼ 20 lm 20 lm ¼ 400 1012 m2
The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm x.
1:201
\10 ) x [ 9:5317 105 m ¼ 95:317lm; RDC@t¼20 lm
6:3 107 20 106 x
¼ 47:65 X
Actually the track is a mixture of silver then the conductivity is half of silver
conductivity.
RDC@t¼20 lm ¼ 95:30 X
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 923
We have RFID Antenna system on a substrate, width 300 lm and lr = 100… 450.
The construction is made from two rectangular spiral antennas, the first rectangular
spiral antenna is on the other rectangular spiral antenna (Symmetric or antisymmetric
structure, mirror picture). We consider the symmetric structure for our calculation.
Each antenna is constructed from silver ointment which his resistance is bigger than
pure silver by 50 %. The track width is 20 lm, gap between tracks 20 lm, track
depth is 20 lm up to 100 lm. The requested antennas total inductance is 2.66 mH
and parasitic resistance less than 10 X. Both rectangular spiral antennas are in series.
We need to find the number of rectangular spiral antenna’s turn (Nc). We consider
that the first and second spiral antennas have the same number of turns
(Nc1 = Nc2 = Nc). Since the RFID antenna substrate permeability is between 100
and 450 (lr = 100… 450), RFID antenna permeability is an average value between
air permeability and the magnet. We consider that the TAG permeability is 100–300
(lr). Possible Antennas dimensions: 2 mm 2 mm, 3 mm 3 mm, 4 mm 4
mm, and permeability 100, 200, 300, 450 (lr). We neglect micro strip parasitic
resistance (Fig. A.4).
Double rectangular spiral antennas can be represented as a two inductors in
series (Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2), parasitic resistances (RDC-1 and RDC-2) and micro strip
(neglect parasitic resistance). The rectangular spiral antennas in series are connected
in parallel to RFID TAG IC. The Equivalent Circuit of Passive RFID TAG with
double rectangular antennas is Capacitor (C1) and Resistor (R1) in parallel with
double rectangular antennas in the series (Fig. A.5).
Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2 are mostly formed by traces on planar PCB. 2 Lm element
represents the mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2. Since two inductors
(Lcalc-1, Lcalc-2) are in series and there is a mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and
Lcalc-2, the total antenna inductance LT: LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm and
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 . Lm is the mutual inductance between Lcalc-1 and Lcalc-2.
A01 A02
Micro-strip
B02 B02
w1 g1 RFID IC w2 g2
Fig. A.5 Double rectangular spiral antennas in series with RFID TAG IC equivalent circuit
H H l
l0 ¼ 4 p 107 1:2566 106 ; lr ¼
m m l0
) l ¼ lr l0 jlr ¼450 ¼ 450 1:2566 106 ¼ 565:47 106
ðt þ wÞ ð20lm þ 20lmÞ
t ¼ g ¼ 20lm ) d ¼ 2 ¼2 ¼ 25:47lm; t ¼ 20 lm
P 3:14
The results in Tables A.5, A.6, A.7, A.8, A.9, A.10, A.11, A.12 and A.13).
Rectangular spiral RFID antenna length calculation & resistance
We have the following rectangular spiral RFID antenna and first we need to
calculate the total length (Fig. A.7).
Table A.5 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc for different values of Nc and l and tag overall dimension
Nc l = l0; lr = 1 Lcalc (2 mm 2 mm) − [H] Lcalc (3 mm 3 mm) − [H] Lcalc (4 mm 4 mm) − [H]
10 l0 = 1.2566 (1e−6)H/m 2.922 10−7 5.3857 10−7 8.048 10−7
20 l0 7.0241 10−7 1.5222 10−6 2.425 10−6
30 l0 8.532 10−7 2.45 10−6 4.266 10−6
60 l0 −5.916 10−7 2.009 10−6 7.351 10−6
−7 −6
100 l0 −1.767 10 −6.6295 10 NaN
150 l0 −9.167 10−5 −6.3052 10−5 −3.6674 10−5
120 l0 −3.8527 10−5 −2.1249 10−5 −6.573 10−5
170 l0 −1.45 10−4 −1.074 10−4 −7.2119 10−5
200 l0 −2.577 10−4 −2.047 10−4 −1.538 10−4
220 l0 −3.58 10−4 −2.932 10−4 −2.3072 10−4
250 l0 −5.5179 10−4 −4.673 10−4 −3.8522 10−4
Nc l = lr l0; lr = 450 Lcalc (2 mm 2 mm) − [H] Lcalc (3 mm 3) − [H] Lcalc (4 mm 4 mm) − [H]
10 565.47 (1e−6)H/m 1.3149 10−4 2.4236 10−4 3.621 10−4
20 565.47 (1e−6)H/m 3.1608 10−4 6.85 10−4 0.0011
30 565.47 (1e−6)H/m 3.8394 10−4 0.0011 0.0019
60 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −2.6625 10−4 9.04 10−4 0.0033
100 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.008 −0.003 NaN
150 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.0413 −0.0284 −0.0165
120 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.0173 −0.0096 −0.003
170 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.0653 −0.0484 −0.0325
200 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.116 −0.0921 −0.0692
220 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.1611 −0.132 −0.1038
250 565.47 (1e−6)H/m −0.2483 −0.2103 −0.1734
Table A.6 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 450 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(2 mm 2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
10 1.3149 10−4 3.9447 10−5 3.4187 10−4
−4 −5
20 3.1608 10 9.4824 10 8.218 10−4
−4 −4
30 3.8394 10 1.1518 10 9.9824 10−4
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 927
Table A.7 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
(2 mm 2 mm) − [H]
10 1.3149 10−4 6.574 10−5 3.9447 10−4
20 3.1608 10 10−4 1.58 10−4 9.482 10−4
−4 −4
30 3.8394 10 1.9197 10 0.0012
Table A.8 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 450 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(2 mm 2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
10 1.3149 10−4 9.2043 10−5 4.47 10−4
20 3.1608 10−4 2.212 10−4 0.0011
30 3.8394 10−4 2.6876 10−4 0.0013
Table A.9 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (3 mm 3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
(3 mm 3 mm) − [H]
10 2.4236 10−4 7.2708 10−5 6.3014 10−4
−4 −4
20 6.85 10 2.055 10 0.0018
30 0.0011 0.0033 0.0029 = 2.9 mH
60 9.04 10−4 2.712 10−4 0.0024 = 2.4 mH
Table A.10 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (3 mm 3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l= lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
(3 mm 3 mm) − [H]
10 2.4236 10−4 1.2118 10−4 7.27 10−4
−4 −4
20 6.85 10 3.425 10 0.0021 = 2.1 mH
30 0.0011 5.5 10−4 0.0033
−4 −4
60 9.04 10 4.52 10 0.0027 = 2.7 mH
Table A.11 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (3 mm 3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
(3 mm 3 mm) − [H]
10 2.4236 10−4 1.6965 10−4 8.24 10−4
20 6.85 10−4 4.795 10−4 0.0023 = 2.3 mH
−4
30 0.0011 7.7 10 0.0037
60 9.04 10−4 6.328 10−4 0.0031
Table A.12 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3, 0.5 (4 mm 4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H]
10 3.621 10−4 1.0863 10−4 9.4146 10−4
20 0.0011 0.0033 0.0029 = 2.9 mH
30 0.0019 5.7 10−4 0.0049
60 0.0033 9.9 10−4 0.0086
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 450 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
10 3.621 10−4 1.8105 10−4 0.0011
20 0.0011 5.5 10−4 0.0033
30 0.0019 9.5 10−4 0.0057
60 0.0033 0.0017 0.0099
Table A.13 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (4 mm 4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
lr = 450 (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H]
10 3.621 10−4 2.5347 10−4 0.0012
20 0.0011 7.7 10−4 0.0037
30 0.0019 0.0013 0.0065
60 0.0033 0.0023 0.0112
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 929
k ¼ 1 ) L1 ¼ A0 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 2 ðw þ gÞ þ A0 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 3 ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 2 ) L2 ¼ A0 3 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 4 ðw þ gÞ þ A0 4 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 5 ðw þ gÞ
k ¼ 3 ) L3 ¼ A0 5 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 6 ðw þ gÞ þ A0 6 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 7 ðw þ gÞ
X
N c 1
LT ¼ L0 þ fA0 ½1 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½3 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞg
X
N c 1
fA0 ½1 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½3 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞg
NX
C 1
¼ f2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ 8 k ðw þ gÞg
k¼1
NX
C 1
2 ½4 k ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
NX
C 1 NX
C 1
¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ðNC 1Þ 8 ðw þ gÞ k; k ¼ NC 1
k¼1 k¼1
930 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
X
N c 1
fA0 ½1 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ
k¼1
þ A0 ½2 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ þ B0 ½3 þ ðk 1Þ 2 ðw þ gÞg
¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ðNC 1Þ 8 ðw þ gÞ ðNC 1Þ
¼ 2 ðNC 1Þ ½A0 þ B0 4 ðw þ gÞ
Final result:
LT ¼ L0 þ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ NC ðw þ gÞ ð8 NC 7Þ
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ðw þ gÞ þ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ NC ðw þ gÞ ð8 NC 7Þ
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½1 þ 8 NC 7
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½8 NC 6
LT ¼ 2 ðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ 2 ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3
LT ¼ 2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3g
LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r S r p a2
LT LT 2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
r S r p a2 r p a2
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 931
S ¼ 20 lm 20 lm ¼ 400 1012 m2
The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm x.
Part B: Analysis for l = lr l0 (lr = 100, 200, 300) (Tables A.14, A.15, A.16,
A.17, A.18, A.19, A.20, A.21, A.22, A.23, A.24, A.25, A.26, A.27, A.28, A.29,
A.30, A.31, A.32, A.33, A.34 and A.35).
The DC resistance of rectangular spiral RFID antenna:
LT LT
RDC ¼ ¼
r S r p a2
LT LT 2 fðA0 þ B0 Þ ð1 þ NC Þ ðw þ gÞ ½4 NC 3g
RDC ¼ ¼ ¼
r S r p a2 r p a2
A0 þ B0 ¼ TBD; NC ¼ TBD; w þ g ¼ 40 106 ) LT ¼ TBD
S ¼ 20 lm 20 lm ¼ 400 1012 m2
Table A.14 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc for different values of Nc and l and tag overall
932
Nc l = lr l0; lr = 100 l = 125.66 (1e-6)H/m Lcalc (2 mm 2 mm) − [H] Lcalc (3 mm 3 mm) − [H] Lcalc (4 mm 4 mm) − [H]
10 125.66 (1e−6)H/m 2.922 10−5 5.3857 10−5 8.0487 10−5
20 125.66 (1e−6)H/m 7.0241 10−5 1.5222 10−4 2.425 10−4
−5 −4
30 125.66 (1e−6)H/m 8.532 10 2.4523 10 4.266 10−4
−5 −4
60 125.66 (1e−6)H/m −5.9168 10 2.009 10 7.351 10−4
−4
100 125.66 (1e−6)H/m −0.0018 −6.629 10 NaN
150 125.66 (1e−6)H/m −0.0092 −0.0063 −0.0037
120 125.66 (1e−6)H/m −0.0039 −0.0021 −6.573 10−4
170 125.66 (1e−6)H/m −0.0145 −0.0107 −0.0072
200 125.66 (1e−6)H/m −0.0258 −0.0205 −0.0154
220 125.66 (1e−6)H/m −0.0358 −0.0293 −0.0231
250 125.66 (1e−6)H/m −0.0552 −0.0467 −0.0385
Nc l = lr l0; lr = 200 l = 251.32 (1e−6)H/m Lcalc (2 mm 2 mm) − [H] Lcalc (3 mm 3 mm) − [H] Lcalc (4 mm 4 mm) − [H]
−5 −4
10 251.32 (1e−6)H/m 5.8439 10 1.0771 10 1.6097 10−4
−4 −4
20 251.32 (1e−6)H/m 1.4048 10 3.0445 10 4.8501 10−4
−4 −4
30 251.32 (1e−6)H/m 1.7064 10 4.9045 10 8.532 10−4
−4 −4
60 251.32 (1e−6)H/m −1.1834 10 4.0179 10 0.0015
100 251.32 (1e−6)H/m −0.0035 −0.0013 NaN
150 251.32 (1e−6)H/m −0.0183 −0.0126 −0.0073
120 251.32 (1e−6)H/m −0.0077 −0.0042 −0.0013
170 251.32 (1e−6)H/m −0.029 −0.0215 −0.0144
200 251.32 (1e−6)H/m −0.0516 −0.0409 −0.0308
220 251.32 (1e−6)H/m −0.0716 −0.0587 −0.0461
250 251.32 (1e−6)H/m −0.1104 −0.0935 −0.077
(continued)
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
Table A.14 (continued)
Nc l = lr l0; lr = 300 Lcalc (2 mm 2 mm) − [H] Lcalc (3 mm 3 mm) − [H] Lcalc (4 mm 4 mm) − [H]
l = 376.98 (1e−6)H/m
10 376.98 (1e−6)H/m 8.7659 10−5 1.6157 10−4 2.4146 10−4
−4 −4
20 376.98 (1e−6)H/m 2.1072 10 4.5667 10 7.2751 10−4
−4 −4
30 376.98 (1e−6)H/m 2.5596 10 7.3568 10 0.0013
60 376.98 (1e−6)H/m −1.775 10−4 6.0269 10−4 0.0022
100 376.98 (1e−6)H/m −0.0053 −0.002 NaN
150 376.98 (1e−6)H/m −0.0275 −0.0189 −0.011
120 376.98 (1e−6)H/m −0.0116 −0.0064 −0.002
170 376.98 (1e−6)H/m −0.0435 −0.0322 −0.0216
200 376.98 (1e−6)H/m −0.0773 −0.0614 −0.0462
220 376.98 (1e−6)H/m −0.1074 −0.088 −0.0692
250 376.98 (1e−6)H/m −0.1655 −0.1402 −0.1156
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
933
934 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
Table A.15 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
lr = 100 (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
(2 mm 2 mm) − [H]
10 2.922 10−5 8.766 10−6 7.5972 10−5
20 7.0241 10−5 2.1072 10−5 1.8263 10−4
−5 −5
30 8.532 10 2.5596 10 2.2183 10−4
Table A.16 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
lr = 100 (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
(2 mm 2 mm) − [H]
10 2.922 10−5 1.461 10−5 8.766 10−5
−5 −5
20 7.0241 10 3.5121 10 2.1072 10−4
−5 −5
30 8.532 10 4.266 10 2.5596 10−4
Table A.17 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
lr = 100 (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
(2 mm 2 mm) − [H]
10 2.922 10−5 2.0454 10−5 9.9348 10−5
−5 −5
20 7.0241 10 4.9169 10 2.3882 10−4
−5 −5
30 8.532 10 5.9724 10 2.9009 10−4
Table A.18 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (3 mm 3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
= Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
lr = 100 (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
(3 mm 3 mm) − [H]
10 5.3857 10−5 1.6157 10−5 1.4003 10−4
−4 −5
20 1.5222 10 4.5666 10 3.9577 10−4
−4 −5
30 2.4523 10 7.3569 10 6.376 10−4
−4 −5
60 2.009 10 6.027 10 5.2234 10−4
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 935
Table A.19 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (3 mm 3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc (K = 0.5) = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.5)
lr = 100 (3 mm 3 mm) − [H]
10 5.3857 10−5 2.6929 10−5 1.6157 10−4
20 1.5222 10−4 7.611 10−5 4.5666 10−4
−4 −4
30 2.4523 10 1.2262 10 7.35 10−4
−4
60 2.009 10 1.0045 6.027 10−4
Table A.20 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (3 mm 3 mm) and K = 0.3,
0.5 (4 mm 4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.7)
lr = 100 (K = 0.7)
(3 mm 3 mm) − [H]
10 5.3857 10−5 3.77 10−5 1.8311 10−4
−4 −4
20 1.5222 10 1.0655 10 5.1755 10−4
−4 −4
30 2.4523 10 1.7166 10 8.3378 10−4
−4 −4
60 2.009 10 1.4063 10 6.8306 10−4
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 100 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.3)
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3)
10 8.0487 10−5 2.4146 10−5 2.0927 10−4
−4 −5
20 2.425 10 7.275 10 6.305 10−4
−4 −4
30 4.266 10 1.2798 10 0.0011
60 7.351 10−4 2.2053 10−4 0.0019
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 100 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.5)
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H] − [H] (K = 0.5)
10 8.0487 10−5 4.0244 10−5 2.4146 10−4
−4 −4
20 2.425 10 1.2125 10 7.275 10−4
−4 −4
30 4.266 10 2.133 10 0.0013
60 7.351 10−4 3.6755 10−4 0.0022 = 2.2 mH
Table A.21 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (4 mm 4 mm) and K = 0.3,
0.5 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lr = 100 (4 mm 4 mm) − [H] Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc +
(K = 0.7) 2 Lm (K = 0.7)
10 8.0487 10−5 5.6341 10−5 2.7366 10−4
−4 −4
20 2.425 10 1.6975 10 8.245 10−4
−4 −4
30 4.266 10 2.9862 10 0.0015
60 7.351 10−4 5.1457 10−4 0.0025 = 2.5 mH
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lr = 200 (2 mm 2 mm) − [H] Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm =
(K = 0.3) 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.3)
10 5.8439 10−5 1.7532 10−5 1.5194 10−4
(continued)
936 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
Table A.22 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.7)
(2 mm 2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7)
10 5.8439 10−5 4.0907 10−5 1.9869 10−4
20 1.4048 10−4 9.8336 10−5 4.7763 10−4
−4 −5
30 1.7064 10 1.1945 10 5.8018 10−4
Table A.23 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (3 mm 3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.3)
(3 mm 3 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3)
10 1.0771 10−4 3.2313 10−5 2.8005 10−4
−4 −5
20 3.0445 10 9.1335 10 7.9157 10−4
−4 −4
30 4.9045 10 1.4714 10 0.0013
60 4.0179 10−4 1.2054 10−4 0.001
Table A.24 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (3 mm 3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.5)
(3 mm 3 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5)
10 1.0771 10−4 5.3855 10−5 3.2313 10−4
−4 −4
20 3.0445 10 1.5223 10 9.1335 10−4
−4 −4
30 4.9045 10 2.4523 10 0.0015
60 4.0179 10−4 2.009 10−4 0.0012
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 937
Table A.25 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (3 mm 3 mm), K = 0.3, 0.5
(4 mm 4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, l = lr l0 Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
lr = 200 (3 mm 3 mm) − [H] Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.7)
(K = 0.7)
10 1.0771 10−4 7.5397 10−5 3.6621 10−4
−4 −4
20 3.0445 10 2.1312 10 0.001
30 4.9045 10−4 3.4332 10−4 0.0017
60 4.0179 10−4 2.8125 10−4 0.0014
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.3)
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3)
10 1.6097 10−4 4.8291 10−5 4.1852 10−4
−4 −4
20 4.8501 10 1.455 10 0.0013
30 8.532 10−4 2.5596 10−4 0.0022 = 2.2 mH
60 0.0015 4.5 10−4 0.0039
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2 + 2 Lm =
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm (K = 0.5)
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5)
10 1.6097 10−4 8.0485 10−5 4.8291 10−4
−4 −4
20 4.8501 10 2.425 10 0.0015
30 8.532 10−4 4.266 10−4 0.0026 = 2.6 mH
60 0.0015 7.5 10−4 0.0045
Table A.26 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (4 mm 4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 200 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
10 1.6097 10−4 1.1268 10−4 5.473 10−4
−4 −4
20 4.8501 10 3.3951 10 0.0016
30 8.532 10−4 5.9724 10−4 0.0029 = 2.9 mH
60 0.0015 0.001 0.0051
Table A.27 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(2 mm 2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
10 8.7659 10−5 2.6298 10−5 2.2791 10−4
−4 −5
20 2.1072 10 6.3216 10 5.4787 10−4
30 2.5596 10−4 7.6788 10−5 6.655 10−4
938 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
Table A.28 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(2 mm 2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
10 8.7659 10−5 4.383 10−5 2.6298 10−4
−4 −4
20 2.1072 10 1.0536 10 6.3216 10−4
−4 −4
30 2.5596 10 1.2798 10 7.6788 10−4
Table A.29 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (2 mm 2 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(2 mm 2 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
10 8.7659 10−5 6.1361 10−5 2.9804 10−4
−4 −4
20 2.1072 10 1.475 10 7.1645 10−4
−4 −4
30 2.5596 10 1.7917 10 8.7026 10−4
Table A.30 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (3 mm 3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(3 mm 3 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
10 1.6157 10−4 4.84 10−5 4.2008 10−4
−4 −4
20 4.5667 10 1.37 10 0.0012
30 7.3568 10−4 2.207 10−4 0.0019
60 6.0269 10−4 1.8081 10−4 0.0016
Table A.31 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (3 mm 3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(3 mm 3 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5) (K = 0.5)
10 1.6157 10−4 8.0785 10−5 4.847 10−4
−4 −4
20 4.5667 10 2.2834 10 0.0014
30 7.3568 10−4 3.6784 10−4 0.0022 = 2.2 mH
60 6.0269 10−4 3.0135 10−4 0.0018
Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis 939
Table A.32 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (3 mm 3 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(3 mm 3 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
10 1.6157 10−4 1.131 10−4 5.4934 10−4
−4 −4
20 4.5667 10 3.1967 10 0.0016
30 7.3568 10−4 5.1498 10−4 0.0025 = 2.5 mH
60 6.0269 10−4 4.2188 10−4 0.002
Table A.33 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.3 (4 mm 4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.3) (K = 0.3)
10 2.4146 10−4 7.2438 10−5 6.278 10−4
−4 −4
20 7.2751 10 2.1825 10 0.0019
30 0.0013 3.9 10−4 0.0034
60 0.0022 6.6 10−4 0.0057
Table A.34 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.5 (4 mm 4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT = Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc +
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.5) 2 Lm (K = 0.5)
10 2.4146 10−4 1.2073 10−4 7.2438 10−4
−4 −4
20 7.2751 10 3.6376 10 0.0022 = 2.2 mH
30 0.0013 6.5 10−4 0.0039
60 0.0022 0.0011 0.0066
Table A.35 RFID rectangular spiral Lcalc, Lm, and LT for K = 0.7 (4 mm 4 mm)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Nc Lcalc-1 = Lcalc-2 = Lcalc, Lm ¼ K Lcalc1 Lcalc2 LT=Lcalc-1 + Lcalc-2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
l = lr l0 lr = 300 Lm ¼ K Lcalc Lcalc ¼ K Lcalc + 2 Lm = 2 Lcalc + 2 Lm
(4 mm 4 mm) − [H] (K = 0.7) (K = 0.7)
10 2.4146 10−4 1.6902 10−4 8.2096 10−4
−4 −4
20 7.2751 10 5.0926 10 0.0025 = 2.5 mH
30 0.0013 9.1 10−4 0.0044
60 0.0022 0.0015 0.0075
940 Appendix A: RFID LF TAG 125 kHz/134 kHz Design and Analysis
The track depth (x) does not influence our total inductance, and then we can take
it as a variable and find his minimum value for RDC < 10 X. S ¼ 20 lm x.
Appendix B
RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics
and Design Methods
An amplifier is an active device that has the ability to amplify voltage, current and
amplify both voltage and current. There are some types of amplifiers. Amplifiers
types: zero frequency amplifiers (DC amplifiers), low frequency amplifiers (Audio
amplifiers), and high frequency amplifiers (RF amplifiers). Power is P = V I,
when current (I) or voltage (V) is raising and will create amplification. The main
desirable specification when designing amplifier: High P1dB (high input power that
cause the UUT gain to drop by 1dB from small signal value). P1dB (IP1dB,
OP1dB), low noise (example LNA), and maximum efficiency (Efficiency (P.E
%) = [output signal power]/[power supply power]). High Gain (S21), b2 is output
signal power, a1 is input signal power S21 = b2/a1 for a2 = 0 (no input signal at
amplifier output). Good return loss (RL). S11 (IRL) ! e and (ORL) ! 1. Return
Loss = Reflection Loss. Amplifiers come in three flavors: Common Base
(CB) amplifiers, Common Collector (CC) amplifiers, and Common Emitter (CE)
amplifiers. It depends whether the base, collector or emitter is common to both the
input and output of the amplifier. Common Base (CB) amplifier, input signal
inserted at emitter (E) and output signal taken from the collector (C). The CB
amplifier can operate as a voltage amplifier for low input impedance circuits.
(B)
CB amplifier can be found at the 50 X antenna input of the radio receiver (Figs. B.1
and B.2).
There is a JFET’s CB amplifier circuit which can be used in receiver’s IF unit.
C2, C3, R2 and RFC (RF choke) are for decoupling. C4, C6 are RF decoupling. C5 is
for flatter frequency response throughout its pass band. T1 is for impedance
matching (Fig. B.3).
(E)
Frequency (GHz)
power amplifier. The Common Emitter (CE) amplifier, input signal inserted at base
(B) and output signal taken from the collector (C). The CE amplifier’s output
voltage is shifted by *180° in phase compared to CE amplifier’s input signal
(Figs. B.4 and B.5).
At RF frequencies there is an effect of “positive feedback”, which creates
amplifier instability and oscillation. “positive feedback” is when there is internal
feedback capacitance between transistor’s collector and its base. It cause to unde-
sired CE oscillations. Inter feedback capacitance can be as high as 25 pF or higher.
At a specific frequency this capacitance will send an in phase signal back into the
base input from the collector’s output. This back in phase signal creates “oscillator”.
Transistor’s internal resistance and capacitance along with other phase delays yield a
powerful phase shift to normally out of phase 180° feedback signal. Only phase
delays that are at a total 360° (0°) will bring amplifier instability and oscillations.
A phase = g(frequency) for a typical CE amplifier unmatched (Fig. B.6).
The Common Collector (CC) amplifier (emitter follower amplifier) has the input
signal inserted into the base, and output signal from emitter. The CC amplifier has
current and power gain, voltage gain less than one (GV < 1). The CC amplifier’s
used as a buffer or active impedance matching circuit. The CC amplifier has high
input impedance and low output impedance. There is no phase inversion between
CC amplifier’s input and output (Figs. B.7 and B.8).
(C)
In order to develop maximum power the Zout of the amplifier must be complex
conjugate of the Zin of the load. The low efficiency (EFF%) level can be increased if
the load has a higher input resistance, thus dropping more power across the load
946 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods
(Zload Zout). The total output power across load will be less in this condition
(Zload Zout) than if Zload = Zout (pure resistive). The transfer of maximum power
from the source to the load will not maximize efficiency (EEF%). Maximum power
transfer only occurs when the source impedance equals the load impedance
Zload = Zout (pure resistive). Any impedance mismatches will end in a loss of
power, Mismatch Loss (ML). ML(dB) = Mismatch Loss. VSWR = Voltage Stand
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 947
VSWR1 2
½1ðVSWR þ 1Þ
Wave Ratio (dimensionless units). ML ¼ 10 log10 ; Mismatch Loss
(ML) (Fig. B.10).
2 n o 32
1 þ jC j
1
41ðn 1jCj
o Þ5
1 þ jCj
½ VSWR1 2
1ðVSWR þ 1Þ
1jCj
þ1
ML ¼ 10 log10 ¼ 10 log10
1 þ jC j
VSWR¼ 1jCj
2 n o 32
2jCj
41ðn 1jCj
oÞ5
2
1jCj ½1jCj2
ML = 10 log10 ¼ ML ¼ 10 log10
Perfect
match
Perfect
match
Low pass
response
Resonant
Peak (S21)
RF circuit matching. There are vital components parasitic effects. Effect that length:
PCB trace and pad reactance (j X elements), and strong influence of circuit length.
In low frequency we can ignore effect of length. In low frequency we not consider
PCB parasitic effects and distance between each matching component and
source/load. At higher RF frequencies the distance between components and cir-
cuits is very critical. The distance affects the moving wave’s wavelengths and the
expected performance of the matching network. It is very important where the
circuit and individual components are located on PCB. Any mismatched line that is
a significant portion of a wavelength, the impedance will vary along that line. The
variations on a mismatched line are due to the standing wave (SWR). The reflected
RF wave is bouncing off of the mismatch load and interacting with forward wave.
The interaction between reflected and forward waves, creating fixed peaks and
valley of voltage and current. The fixed peaks and valleys of voltage and current are
created at every half wavelength (k/2) along the trace. The distance between each
circuit element is varied; this distance will completely destroy any predicted RF
match. Figure B.18 describes the voltage and current standing waves on a mis-
matched transmission line.
First the match is calculated with zero micro-strip length and second the cal-
culated match will degrade with micro-strip length. We must take into consideration
the micro-strips length effects in our impedance matching calculation (Fig. B.19).
Wavelength
λ/2
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 951
There are two unavoidable and undesirable elements of any electronic circuits: dis-
tortion and noise. Distortion can deform the carrier and its sidebands at the transmitter
and receiver. Distortion causes to spectral regrowth and adjacent channel interface.
Additionally distortion causes faulty, distorted replica of the original baseband sig-
nal, and increasing the Bit Error Rate (BER). Noise degrades all important BER of
the entire system. Distortion forms frequencies inter modulation products. Distortion
frequency inter-modulation is cause by internal nonlinear mixing of any signal with
one or more other signals, mixing with other signals, and modulated or unmodulated
waveform that is altered is shape or amplitude from the original signal (improper
circuit response). The distortion types are frequency distortion, amplitude and phase
distortion, inter-modulation distortion, second order inter modulation distortion,
harmonic distortion and noise. Frequency distortion happened when passive or active
circuit increases or decreases the amplitude of particular frequencies differently than
the other frequencies. Frequency distortion is a common problem wide band IF or RF
amplifiers. The frequency limitations of amplifiers have many causes. The reasons
for frequency limitation of amplitudes are active device’s transit time, negative
taking place over the whole signal cycle due to incorrect biasing. If CE amplifier’s
input signal is too large, it causes the amplifier to be limited by the supply voltage
(clipping). CE amplifier’s amplification may not be linear over the entire frequency
range of inputs. CE amplifier’s multiplication factor is called the Beta (b) value of
the transistor. Common emitter or even common source type transistor circuits
work fine for small AC input signals. CE amplifiers suffer from one major disad-
vantages: The bias Q-point of a bipolar amplifier depends on the same (b) value
which may vary from transistors of the same type, Q-point for one transistor is not
necessarily the same as the Q-point for another transistor of the same type due to the
inherent manufacturing tolerances. If the CE amplifiers suffer from one major
disadvantage the amplifier may not be linear, amplitude distortion will result, and a
carful choice of the transistor and biasing components can minimize the effect of
amplifier distortion. The CE amplifier’s amplitude distortion is presented in
Fig. B.23.
Phase distortion or delay distortion occurs in a nonlinear transistor amplifier
when there is a time delay between the input signal and its appearance at the output
(Fig. B.24).
The phase change between the input and the output is zero at the fundamental
frequency. The resultant phase angle delay will be the different between the
Fig. B.24 Amplifier’s input signal X(t) and output signal Y(t + Dt)
954 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods
harmonic and fundamental. The time delay (D) will depend on the construction of
the amplifier and will increase progressively with frequency within the bandwidth
of the amplifier. Any practical amplifier will have a combination of both “fre-
quency” and “phase” distortion together with amplitude distortion. Most applica-
tions such as in audio amplifiers or power amplifiers, unless the distortion is
excessive or severe it will not generally affect the operation of the system.
Figure B.25 describes the phase distortion due to delay.
The Intermodulation Distortion (ID), quite similar to the amplitude distortion. ID
is produced when frequencies not harmonically related to the fundamental. Inter
Modulation Distortion (IMD) products can be formed by mixing together of the
carrier with interferers, harmonic, IMD products from other stages, other channels,
or sideband, producing various spurious response. IMD products are in band and
can swamp the desired signal, creating severs interference. When neighbouring
transmitted signal arrives at a PA’s stage, mix together with the transmitter’s carrier,
causing IMDs to be created. ID is produced when two or more frequencies mix in
any nonlinear device. It causes numerous sum and different combinations of the
original fundamental frequencies (second order products: f1 + f2, f1 − f2). It causes
intermodulation products (m f1 þ n; mf1 f2 n f2 ), n and m are whole numbers.
Third order ID products, which would be 2 f1 þ f2 , 2 f1 f2 , 2 f2 þ f1 , 2 f2 f1
can be most damaging of the higher or lower IMDs. The second order IMD
products would usually be too far from the receivers or transmitter’s band pass to
create many problems (Fig. B.26).
Third Order Intercept Point (TOIP, IP3): Third order spurious products will be
created within nonlinearity of a device (linear amplifier, active filter, and mixer).
Output IP3 point can never actually reached, since the amplifier will go into sat-
uration before this amplitude is ever truly attained. The value of the IP3 must be
measured only when it is in its linear operating range (DUT is not in compression).
Typically amplifier’s third order intercept point (IP3) is located approximately 10 to
15 dB above its P1 dB compression point. The output IP3 (OIP3) for a BJT
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 955
Fig. B.28 Amplifier’s output versus input and intercept point saturation region
noise caused by sunspots and solar flares. Cosmic noise is created by interfering
signals from stars. Noise is generated in all stages in amplifier and radio receivers.
The first stages, operating at the lowest signal levels, which are of main concern,
particularly where low signals from aerials, microphones, etc., are not be amplified.
Figure B.30 describes the source resistance (RS) which generated noise.
Thermal noise is generated because there is no such a device as a perfect
amplifier. Thermal noise is the resistance generates a noise voltage (Et) as follow:
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Et ¼ 2 K T B RS ; K—Boltzmann’s constant, T—Absolute temperature, B—
Bandwidth in hertz. At normal temperature (
17 C), this is simplifies to Et ¼
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1:6 1020 B RS resistance’s noise is the lowest noise which can be achieved
at the amplifier input. The practical equivalent noise at the input is always higher
than this resistance’s noise. The noise whilst is generated by an amplifier system.
The degree of noise is evaluated by referring it to the amplifier input. It is con-
sidered as equivalent noise at the input as though it were being generated at that
point. The equivalent noise voltage (En) is calculated by dividing the noise mea-
sured at the amplifier output (Eno) by the gain of the amplifier (AV), i.e, En = Eno/
AV. Noise in any system is dependent on bandwidth of the system and this must be
specified when defining noise performance. It is common practice to define noise
for a 1 Hz bandwidth. Noise voltage might be specified in Nano volts per square
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
root of Hertz (nV= Hz). Over a limited bandwidth, noise power can be considered
to be proportional to bandwidth and the noise voltage is proportional to the square
root of bandwidth. If noise voltage is defined for a 1 Hz bandwidth system, noise
can be determined by multiplying by the square root of the system bandwidth. The
level of noise generated by an amplifier system generally varies over a wide
spectrum and for a wide bandwidth. Noise performance must be defined by plotting
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
noise (say in nV= Hz) against frequency. In solid state amplifiers, noise is often
resolved into two components at the amplifier input. An equivalent noise voltage
generator (Vn) and an equivalent noise current generator (In). The first component
(Vn) is independent of the value of source resistance (Rs). The second component
(In) develops a noise voltage across Rs and equal to In Rs . The noise voltage it
develops is directly proportional to the value of Rs (Fig. B.31).
958 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods
Fig. B.31 Equivalent noise voltage and noise current at amplifier input
The Vn can be separated from the voltage developed by In and also the thermal
noise (Et) by short circuiting the input terminals. One method of defining the noise
performance of an amplifier is the noise figure (F). This can be defined as the ratio
of equivalent noise power developed at the input to that generated by thermal noise
in the source resistance (Rs). Noise figure is often expressed in decibel form and a
perfect amplifier would have a Noise Figure (NF) of 0 dB, if such a device were
possible. To establish Noise Figure (NF), the voltage gain (Av) of the amplifier is
measured and the noise voltage output (Eno) is measured at a known bandwidth (B).
For the second measurement, the amplifier input must be terminated in a resistance
(Rs) equal to the normal source resistance. Noise figure is calculated as follows:
( )
Eno
F ¼ 20 log pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi dB:
Av 1:6 1020 B RS
The noise figure formula assumes a high impedance input to the amplifier. The
effective value of Rs as far as the calculation is concerned, is the parallel result of
the source resistance and input resistance of the amplifier. If the source is a
transmission line and it is terminated in its characteristic impedance (Z0), then Rs
should be substituted by a value Z0 divided by 2 (Fig. B.32).
Small Signal (SS) amplifiers always bias in their linear region. Small Signal
(SS) amplifier needed to increase tiny signal levels to proper levels required for a
transmitter’s final power amplifier (PA). A microwave receivers, first RF amplifier
(class A SS), high gain type. The discreet RF amplifier design topics are choice of
active device, input and output impedance matching network, bias circuit, and
physical layout. Typical transistor has not a 50 X resistive Zin and Zout and its
reactance will vary over frequency, A þ i B ! B ¼ gðf Þ then A þ i gðf Þ.
Matching network must be use to match the device. Using LC components, the
match be perfect for narrow band of frequencies. SS amplifier has also inductive or
capacitive parts when perfect match is 50 þ i 0.
The matching process is as follow: first to match the active device to the sys-
tem’s resistive impedance and second to cancel the innate reactive elements within
the transistor, permit a perfect 50 þ i 0 match with no reactance (capacitive and
inductive). This is calling conjugate matching. RF matching network: Take
S-parameter two port file, which represent transistor and initially ignore any effects
the added DC biasing network which may have on the active device in the final
physical design. This assumption is valid only if small amounts of RF feedback are
produced by the high values of Rf (RB) (feedback resistor) in an amplifier’s bias
network. Low value resistor for Rf (RB) employs heavy RF feedback. When we
choose low value resistor for RF then device’s S-parameter file calculation for the
matching networks may no longer be completely valid for the transistor. It is
accurate only when the bias network employs high resistance values within the bias
network (Fig. B.33).
S-parameter files (*.S2P) contain only RF parameters for few frequencies
( 20). It is possible that interest frequency may falls between two published
values. For accuracy we take mean value between two closest frequencies within
the file. Example: S-parameters are given in a certain *.S2P file for 3 GHz and
4 GHz. Our design requires a centred frequency at 3.5 GHz. We take the mean
value of each S-parameter at 3 and 4 GHz. To compute S12 at 3.6 GHz we use the
following formula:
S11 ¼ 0:195 \ 167:6 ; S22 ¼ 0:508 \ 32 ; S12 ¼ 0:139 \ 61:2 ; S12 ¼ 2:5 \ 62:4
Ds ¼ S11 S22 S12 S21 ¼ ½0:195 \ 167:6 ½0:508 \ 32
½0:139 \ 61:2 ½2:5 \ 62:4 ¼ 0:25 \ 61:4
1 þ ðjDs j2 jS11 j2 jS22 j2 Þ 1 þ ðj0:25j2 j0:195j2 j0:508j2 Þ
K¼ ¼ ¼ 1:1
2 jS21 j jS12 j 2 j2:5j j0:139j
The maximum available gain (sometimes called MAG and sometimes called
GMAX) of a device is only defined where K is greater than one. Algebraically, this
is because the term under the square root becomes negative for values of K less than
1. If K < 1 then maximum available gain is infinite and infinite gain means
oscillator. GMAX is calculated from stability factor K and the forward and reverse
transmission coefficients (S21, S22).
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi S21
GMAX ¼ ðK K 2 1Þ for K [ 1:
S12
If K = 1 then GMAX ¼ S21
S12 for K ¼ 1 and available gain is undefined when K
is less than one. That is when the square root of (K2 − 1) becomes imaginary.
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi jS21 j pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ðK þ K 2 1Þ jS21 j
GMAX ¼ ðK K 1Þ
2 ¼ ðK K 1Þ 2 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
jS12 j ðK þ K 2 1Þ jS12 j
" #
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi jS21 j 1 jS21 j
GMAX ¼ ðK K 1Þ
2 ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
jS12 j ðK þ K 1Þ jS12 j
2
" #
1 jS21 j pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 jS21 j
GMAX ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi K 1) K 2 1K ¼ 2 K S
ðK þ K 2 1Þ jS12 j j 12 j
h i
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi jS j
ðK þ K 2 1Þ 21
jS21 j pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
jS12 j jS j ðK þ K 2 1Þ
GMAX log ¼ 10 log10 ¼ 10 log10 12 þ 10 log10
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
jS j jS j ðK þ K 1Þ
2
GMAX log ¼ 10 log1021 10 log1012 þ 10 log10
962 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods
S11 ¼ 0:195 \ 167:6 ; S22 ¼ 0:508 \ 32 ; S12 ¼ 0:139 \ 61:2 ; S12 ¼ 2:5 \ 62:4
Ds ¼ S11 S22 S12 S21 ¼ ½0:195 \ 167:6 ½0:508 \ 32
½0:139 \ 61:2 ½2:5 \ 62:4 ¼ 0:25 \ 61:4
1 þ ðjDs j2 jS11 j2 jS22 j2 Þ 1 þ ðj0:25j2 j0:195j2 j0:508j2 Þ
K ¼ ¼ ¼ 1:1
2 jS21 j jS12 j 2 j2:5j j0:139j
jS j
½ 21 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi j2:5j pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
jS j ðK þ K 2 1Þ ½ ð1:1 1:12 1Þ
GMAX log ¼ 10 log1012 þ 10 log10 ¼ 10 log10
j0:139j
þ 10 log10
¼ 10:63 dB
Fig. B.35 Amplifier circuit with termination low frequencies into 50 X to prevent instability
964 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods
Fig. B.36 Amplifier circuit with possible location of a shunt or series stabilization resistor
We get the SS amplifier gain and stability by scalar approximation. In the scalar
approximation only the magnitude of the S-parameters are employed and phase
angles are not employed. Gtu is the transducer unilateral gain in dB. It is an
amplifier’s power gain into an unmatched 50 X load, a worse case gain value is
Gtu ¼ 10 log½jS21j2 . Mismatch Loss (ML) is (ML ¼ a p) at transistor’s input in
decibels: a pin ¼ 10 logð1 ½S11 2 Þ. Mismatch Loss (ML ¼ a p) at transis-
tor’s output in decibels: a pout ¼ 10logð1 ½S22 2 Þ. The Mismatch Loss
(ML) for unmatched transistor is a Ptotal ¼ apin þ a pout . The Maximum
Available Gain (MAG) is calculated by MAG ¼ Gtu þ a Ptotal .
jS21 j
MSG ¼ 10 logð Þ:
jS12 j
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 965
If MAG<MSG then the transistor is stable and if MAG>MSG then the transistor
is unstable. Example: we have transistor with the following S-parameters:
S11 ¼ 0:195 \ 167:6 ) S11 ¼ 0:195; S22 ¼ 0:508 \ 32 ) S22 ¼ 0:508
S12 ¼ 0:139 \ 61:2 ) S12 ¼ 0:139; S21 ¼ 2:5 \ 62:4 ) S21 ¼ 2:5:
ðj2:5j2 Þ ð10:1952 Þ
Gtu ¼ 10 log10 ¼ 7:96 dB; aPin ¼ 10 log10 ¼ 0:168 dB
ð10:508Þ2
aPout ¼ 10 log10 ¼ 1:29 dB
aPtotal ¼ aPin þ aPout ¼ 0:168 dB þ 1:29 dB ¼ 1:46 dB
MAG ¼ Gtu þ aPtotal ¼ Gtu þ aPin þ aPout ¼ 7:96 dB þ 1:46 dB ¼ 9:42dB
ðj2:5j=j0:139jÞ
MSG ¼ 10 log10 ¼ 12:55 dB; MAG\MSG ) transistor stable
The most amplifiers matching networks are type L (LC), type T, and type PI. We
need to design the amplifier stage’s matching network. Our target is that the
amplifier’s impedance is exactly matching the independences of the circuit. If
ZS ¼ ZL than maximum power is transferred from the source to load (no power
reflections) (Fig. B.37).
The amplifier and load ZS ¼ Rs þ j Xs ; ZL ¼ RL j XL , only if Rs ¼ RL and
Xs ¼ XL then there is a perfect match. There are three popular matching networks L,
PI, T (Fig. B.38).
1 1 1
Xs ¼ XL ) x L ¼ ; x2 ¼ ) x ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
xC LC LC
1
f ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi :
2p LC
There is only one frequency which will be perfectly matched from source to load
(Fig. B.39).
And unmatched system: (Fig. B.40).
Example A: RS \RL ; f ¼ 1:5 GHz. If Zin ¼ Rs then there is a perfect match
otherwise Zin 6¼ Rs and there is unperfected match (Fig. B.41).
1 ZC ZLoad
XL ¼ j x L; XC ¼ ; Zin ¼ ZL þ ZC k ZLoad ¼ ZL þ
jxC ZC þ ZLoad
jxC RL
1
RL
Zin ¼ j x L þ 1 ¼ j x Lþ
jxC þ RL
1 þ j x C RL
RL ð1 j x C RL Þ
Zin ¼ j x L þ ¼jxL
1 þ j x C RL ð1 j x C RL Þ
RL ð1 j x C RL Þ
þ
1 þ x2 C2 R2L
j x C R2L RL
Zin ¼ j x L þ
1 þ x2 C2 R2L 1 þ x2 C2 R2L
C R2L RL
¼jx L þ
1 þ x C RL
2 2 2 1 þ x C2 R2L
2
RL C R2L
ð1Þ ) ¼ RS ; ð2Þ ) L ¼ 0;
1 þ x2 C RL
2 2 1 þ x2 C 2 R2L
RL
ð1Þ ) ¼ 1 þ x2 C 2 R2L
RS
ð1Þ ) x2 C 2 R2L
RL 1 1 1 RL
¼ 1)C ¼ 2
¼ 1
RS RL RS x2 x2 R2L x2 R2L RS
s
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RL 1
ð1Þ ) C ¼ 1 ¼
x RL RS 2 p 1:5 GHz 58
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
58
1 ¼ 3:56 1012 ¼ 3:56 pF:
12
968 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods
C R2L C R2L
ð2Þ ) L ¼ 0 ) L ¼
1 þ x2 C2 R2L 1 þ x2 C2 R2L
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
h iffi
xRL RS 1 RL
1 RL 2
¼ h i
1 þ x2 xR
1
L
RRLS 1 R2L
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
h iffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
h iffi
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi
RL
x
RL
RS 1 RL
x
RL
RS 1
RS RL
ð2Þ ) L ¼ h i ¼ RL ¼ 1
1 þ RRLS 1 RS
x RS
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
12 58
¼ 1 ¼ 2:48 109 ¼ 2:48 nH
2 p 1:5 GHz 12
RL fx L x3 C L2 x C R2L g
Zin ¼ 2
þj
½1 x2 C L x2 C2 R2L ½1 x2 C L2 x2 C2 R2L
RL x fL x2 C L2 C R2L g
Zin ¼ þj
½1 x2 C L2 þ x2 C2 R2L ½1 x2 C L2 þ x2 C 2 R2L
RL
Zin ¼ RS ) ð1Þ ¼ RS ; ð2ÞL x2 C L2 C R2L ¼ 0
½1 x2 C L2 þ x2 C2 R2L
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 969
L
ð2ÞL x2 C L2 C R2L ¼ 0 ) C ¼ ; ð2Þ ) ð1Þ )
x2 L2 R2L
RL
ð1Þ h i h i2 ¼ RS
1 x2 x2 LL2 R2 L2 þ x2 x2 LL2 R2 RS
L L
2
RL x2 L2 x 2 L 2 R2
ð2Þ ¼ 1 2 2 þ )
RS x L R 2
½x2 L2 R2 2
" #2
12 ð2 p 1:5 109 Þ2 L2 ð2 p 1:5 109 Þ2 L2 122
ð2Þ 0:2 ¼ ¼ 1 2
þh i2
58 ð2 p 1:5 109 Þ L2 122 ð2 p 1:5 109 Þ2 L2 122
When two different, but pure resistances must be matched the L-technique is
applied to perform the task. If reactance XL or XC must be cancelled, we use two
methods: first the absorption uses to reactance of the impedance matching network
itself to be absorb the undesired load and/or source reactance. Second the reso-
nance, which is utilized to resonant out the stray reactance of the device or circuit to
be matched at our desired frequency.
First absorption method: this is accomplished by positioning the matching
inductor in series with any load or source inductive reactance. In this way, the load
or source’s XL becomes a part of the matching inductor. The same outcome can be
attained by positioning a matching capacitor in parallel with any load or source XC.
Thus we are combining the two values into one larger value. This allows the
internal stray reactance of both devices to contribute the matching network. This
internal reactance is being subtracted from the calculated values of the LC matching
components. The transistors own stray reactance is now becoming an additive part
of the matching network. This absorption method is only useful if the stray internal
reactance of the device is less than the calculated reactance required for a proper
match. Figure B.43 describes the circuit that requires the addition of components to
absorb reactance.
LS þ L1 ! L01 is a new inductance value for matching L network. CS þ C1 ! C10
is a new capacitor value for matching L network. The absorption methods are by
using Z match network. The below figure describes the absorption methods by
using Z matching network (Figs. B.44, B.45 and B.46).
Second absorption (resonance) method: Resonance technique is utilized to res-
onate out the stray reactance of the device or circuit to be matched at our desired
frequency (f). It is done with a reactance that is equal in value, but opposite sign and
then continuing on as if the matching problem were a completely resistive one
(R þ j 0). This will make the internal stray reactance of the two devices or circuits
Fig. B.48 Amplifier (source) and load canceling the load’s stray reactance
disappear and allowing only the pure resistances to be easily dealt with. We need to
design a matching network which employing the second method. Figure B.47
describes the resonance impedance matching.
We need to resonate out 1.5 pF (Cstray) of stray capacitance within the load. It is
done by employing a shunt inductor with value of L ¼ j2pf j12 C (Fig. B.48).
stray
1
Cstray kL ) ZT ¼ j x Lk
j x Cstray
j x L jxC1 stray jxL
) ZT ¼ ¼
j x Lþ 1
jxCstray
1 x2 L Cstray
xL
ZT ¼ j ; Resonate ) ZT ! 1ðdisconnected element)
1 x2 L Cstray
1e
) ZT ! 1 ) 1 - x2 L Cstray ! e ) L ! 2 ;e¼0
x Cstray
1 1
)L¼ 2 ¼
x Cstray j2 p f j2 Cstray
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 973
fc
When utilizing high Q inductor Q = f2 f 1
. Q is the loaded quality factor of the
circuit. fc is the center frequency of the circuit. f2 is the upper frequency, need to
pass with little loss. f1 is the lower frequency, need to pass with little loss, we use PI
network to match two different pure resistances (Fig. B.50).
We consider PI network as two L networks attached back to back. There is a
virtual resistor “R” in the center, which is used only as an aid in designing these
networks. The virtual “R” will not be in the final design. We choose (Fig. B.51)
X
2
XS
XS1 þ XS2 ¼ XSi ; XS ¼ x L ¼ 2 p f L )
i¼1
2 p f
1 1 1
XP ¼ ¼ )C¼
x C 2 p f C 2 p f XP
To match two stages with a PI network, while canceling reactance and matching
resistances, first we convert the load/source to/from parallel or series equivalences
and second we make it easier to absorb any reactance. Any PI network can be
transformed to an equivalent T network. This is also known as the Wye-Delta
transformation, which is the terminology used in power distribution and electrical
engineering. The PI is equivalent to the Delta and the T is equivalent to the Wye (or
star) form. The PI network and T network topologies are described in Fig. B.52.
The impedances of the PI network (Za, Zb, Zc) can be found from the impe-
dances of the T-network with the following equations:
The common numerator in all these expressions can prove useful in reducing the
amount of computation necessary. The impedances of the T-network (Z1, Z2, Z3)
can be found from the impedances of the equivalent PI-network with the following
equations. The next expression describes the PI network to T network transfor-
mation. There is a common denominator in these expressions.
from bringing the j in the denominator up top. In that case also all T-network
impedances are reactive. The below equations describe the situation when all PI
network impedances are reactive.
Za Zc Zb Zc Za Zb
Z1 ¼ ; Z2 ¼ ; Z3 ¼
Za Zb Zc Za Zb Zc Za Zb Zc
Za ¼ j a; Zb ¼ j b; Zc ¼ j c
Za Zc j a j c j2 a c a c
Z1 ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼j
Za þ Zb þ Zc j a þ j b þ j c j ða þ b þ cÞ ða þ b þ cÞ
Zb Zc j a j c j2 b c b c
Z2 ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼j
Za þ Zb þ Zc j a þ j b þ j c j ða þ b þ cÞ ða þ b þ cÞ
Za Zc j a j b j2 a b a b
Z1 ¼ ¼ ¼ ¼j
Za þ Zb þ Zc j a þ j b þ j c j ða þ b þ cÞ ða þ b þ cÞ
The beta (b) is the phase lag passing through the network from either port 1 to
port 2 or vice versa. If beta (b) is 0 or p, these expressions break down, except if
R1 = R2. To transform resistive impedances without any phase shift, we have to use
j R1 R2 sin b R sin b
Za ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi jR1 ¼R2 ¼R ¼ j
R2 cos b R1 R2 ½cos b 1
j R1 R2 sin b R sin b
Zb ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi j ¼j
R1 cos b R1 R2 R1 ¼R2 ¼R ½cos b 1
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Zc ¼ j R1 R2 sin b
Fig. B.54 Conjugate series capacitance to cancel transistor’s series input impedance
Hint: We would like to get away from using a lump series capacitor.
Solution: We convert the series input impedance of the device into equivalent
parallel input impedance. The equivalent parallel input impedance circuit permits us
to exploit a shunt distributed element. The shunt distributed element resonates out
the input impedance of the device. Series input impedance: Xs series reactance (X)
and Rs series resistance (X). Parallel input inductance: Xp equivalent parallel
reactance (X) and Xp equivalent parallel resistance (X). We interest in amplifier’s
series input impedance circuit to parallel input impedance circuit conversion. We
need to get the expressions for Xp and Rp as functions of Xs, Rs and developing the
mathematical connections between those circuit’s parameters (Fig. B.55).
j XP RP j XP RP j XP þ RP
j XS þ RS ¼ ) j XS þ RS ¼
j XP þ RP j XP þ RP j XP þ RP
X RP þ j XP RP
2 2
) j XS þ RS ¼ P ) j XS þ RS
XP2 þ R2P
X 2 RP XP R2P
¼ 2P þ j
XP þ R2P XP2 þ R2P
XP R2P XP R2P
ð1Þ XS ¼ 2 ) XP2 þ R2P ¼ ;
XP þ RP 2 XS
XP2 RP X 2 RP
ð2Þ RS ¼ ) XP2 þ R2P ¼ P
XP þ RP
2 2 RS
XP RP XP RP
2 2
ð1Þ & ð2Þ ) ¼
XS RS
RP XP RP RS 2 X 2 RP
) ¼ ) XP ¼ ; XP þ R2P ¼ P
XS RS XS RS
h i2
RP R R R 2
RP RS
RP
XP2 RP RS XS P P S
XP2 þ R2P
¼ ) þ RP ¼
2
¼
RS XS RS RS XS
RP RS 2 RP RP RS 2
þ R2P ¼
XS RS XS
2
R RP R2 R2 RP R2S
) R2P þ R2P S2 ¼ R2P S2 ) R2P 1 þ S2 ¼ R2P
XS RS XS XS RS XS2
R2 RP R2S R2 RP R2S R2 RS
R2P 1 þ S2 ¼ RP 2 ) 1 þ S2 ¼ 2 ) 1 þ S2 ¼ RP 2
XS RS XS XS RS XS XS XS
R2S RS X2
1þ 2
¼ RP 2 ) RP RS ¼ XS2 þ R2S ) RP ¼ S þ RS
XS XS RS
RP RS XS2
ðAÞXP ¼ ; ðBÞRP ¼ þ RS
XS RS
W and h use the same units and Er is the dielectric constant of the board material.
The dielectric constant of the medium does not have a unit because it is a ratio.
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 981
377
Z0 ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
W
h þ 1 Er þ Er
Vp is the fraction of the speed of light as compared to light in a vacuum. kvac is the
wavelength of the signal of interest in a perfect vacuum. f is the frequency of the
signal of interest, GHz. The actual wavelength of the signal in microstrip line is as
follows:
8 9
>
< >
=
Er þ 1 ðEr 1Þ 1 1
Eeff ¼ þ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi &VP ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 >
: 2 1 þ ð12h >
; Eeff
W Þ
1
) VP ¼ sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
; kvac ¼ 11;800=f
Er þ 1 ðEr 1Þ
2 þ 2 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ffi
1þð 12h
W Þ
kvac 11;800
k ¼ VP kvac ¼ sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
¼ sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Er 1 Er 1 1 1 11;8002
) þ þ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 2
2 2 2 1 þ ð12hÞ 2 1 þ ð12hÞ k f2
W W
1 1 1 1 11;8002
Er ½1 þ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi þ ½1 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 2
2 1 þ ð12h 2 k f2
W Þ 1 þ ð12h W Þ
1 1 11;8002 1 1
) Er ½1 þ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 2 ½1 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 1þð W Þ k f 2 2 1 þ ð12h W Þ
12h
1 1 11;8002 1 1
Er ½1 þ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ¼ 2 ½1 qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
2 1þð W Þ k f 2 2 1 þ ð12h W Þ
12h
2118002
k2 f 2
½1 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ffi
1þð
12h
Þ
) Er ¼ W
½1 þ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 ffi
1 þ ð12h
W Þ
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 983
377
Z0 ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
pffiffiffiffiffiffi
W
h þ 1 Er þ Er
377
¼ vffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u v u
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u u211;8002
u211;8002 1pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi u p ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
u
1 1
W 1
W þ u
k2 f 2 k2 f 2
u 1 þ ð12hÞ
u
1 þ ð12hÞ
W
h þ1 u t
t 1 þ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1
1 þ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1
12h1þð Þ 12h
1þð Þ
W W
j ðC1 þ CX Þ RL RL x C1 CX þ j ðC1 þ CX Þ
ZC1X k RL ¼
RL x C1 CX j ðC1 þ CX Þ RL x C1 CX þ j ðC1 þ CX Þ
ðC1 þ CX Þ2 RL j ðC1 þ CX Þ R2L x C1 CX
ZC1X k RL ¼
R2L x2 C12 CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ2 RL
ZC1X k Zload ¼ ZC1X k RL ¼
R2L x2 C12 CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ R2L x C1 CX
j
R2L x2 C12 CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ2 RL
ð1Þ ¼ RS
R2L x2 C12 CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ R2L C1 CX
ð2ÞL ¼0
R2L x2 C12 CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
We know that
RL C0 & RL C0 þ D
RL C0 & RL C0 þ D ) C0 RL C0 þ D; RL 2 ½C0 ; C0 þ D
ðC1 þ CX Þ2 RL
ð1Þ RS ¼ ) R2L x2 C12 CX2 RS
R2L x2 C12 CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2 RS ¼ ðC1 þ CX Þ2 RL
R2L x2 C12 CX2 RS ¼ ðC1 þ CX Þ2 ðRL RS Þ ) ðC1 þ CX Þ2
R2L x2 C12 CX2 RS
¼
RL RS
ðC1 þ CX Þ R2L C1 CX
ð1Þ ) ð2Þ ) L ¼0
R2L x2 C12 CX2 þ ðC1 þ CX Þ2
ðC1 þ CX Þ R2L C1 CX
) L ¼0
R2L x2 C12 CX2 RS
R2L x2 C12 CX2 þ RL RS
ðC1 þ CX Þ R2L C1 CX
L¼
R2L x2 C12 CX2 RS
R2L x2 C12 CX2 þ RL RS
ðC1 þ CX Þ R2L C1 CX ðRL RS Þ
)L¼ 2
RL x C12 CX2 ðRL RS Þ þ R2L x2 C12 CX2 RS
2
C1 ðRS RL Þ
CX ¼ ) C X R L C X R S C X x2 C 1 R L L
R L R S x2 C 1 R L L
¼ C1 RS C1 RL
CX RL CX x2 C1 RL L þ C1 RL ¼ C1 RS þ CX RS
RL fCX CX x2 C1 L þ C1 g ¼ RS ðC1 þ CX Þ
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ
)RL ¼
CX CX x2 C1 L þ C1
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ RS ðC1 þ CX Þ
RL C0 ) RL ¼ C0 ) C0
CX CX x2 C1 L þ C1 CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ RS ðC1 þ CX Þ
C0 ) C0 0
CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1 CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ
C0 ¼ 0
CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ RS ðC1 þ CX Þ
C0 ¼ 0 ) ¼ C0
CX f1 x C1 Lg þ C1
2 CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ ¼ CX f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 þ C1 C0
RS C1 þ RS CX ¼ CX f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 þ C1 C0
RS C1 C1 C0 ¼ CX f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 RS CX
ð1Þ
CX fC0 x2 C1 L C0 RS g ¼ RS C1 C1 C0 ) CX
C1 ðRS C0 Þ
¼
C0 ½1 x2 C1 L RS
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 987
The other option for case (=) is when upper limit is Г0 + D, Г0 ! Г0 + D then
ð1Þ C1 ðRS C0 Þ
CX ¼ ) C0 ½1 x2 C1 L RS 6¼ 0
C0 ½1 x2 C1 L RS
RS
) 1 x2 C1 L 6¼
C0
RS
x C1 L 6¼ 1
2
C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
) x 6¼
2
ð1 Þ ) x 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð1 Þ
C1 L C0 C1 L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
) 2 p f 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð1 Þ ) f 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð1 Þ;
C1 L C0 2 p C1 L C0
RS RS
1 [0 ) 1[ ) C0 [ RS
C0 C0
ð2Þ C1 ðRS C0 DÞ
CX ¼ ) ðC0 þ DÞ ½1 x2 C1 L RS 6¼ 0
ðC0 þ DÞ ½1 x2 C1 L RS
RS
1 x2 C1 L 6¼
C0 þ D
RS 1 RS
) x2 C1 L 6¼ 1 ) x2 6¼ ð1 Þ
C0 þ D C1 L C0 þ D
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
x 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 1 ) 2 p f 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 1
C1 L C0 þ D C1 L C0 þ D
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS RS
f 6¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 1 )1 [0
2 p C1 L C0 þ D C0 þ D
RS
) 1[ ) C0 þ D [ RS
C0 þ D
988 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods
Discussion No.1: check the values interval for lower limit Г0.
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ RS ðC1 þ CX Þ
C0 0 ) C0 [ 0
CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1 CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ CX f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 C1 C0
[0
CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
Case No.1.A:
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ CX f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 C1 C0 [ 0
& CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1 [ 0
RS C1 þ RS CX CX f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 C1 C0 [ 0
& C1 [ CX fx2 C1 L 1g
CX ½RS f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 [ C1 C0 RS C1
& C1 [ CX fx2 C1 L 1g
CX ½RS f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 [ C1 ½C0 RS
& C1 [ CX fx2 C1 L 1g
We consider RS f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 [ 0 and x2 C1 L 1 [ 0
Then
C1 ½C0 RS C1
CX [ & CX \ 2
RS f1 x C1 Lg C0
2 x C1 L 1
C1 C1 ½C0 RS
[ CX [
x2 C1 L 1 RS f1 x2 C1 Lg C0
C1 C1 ½1 CRS0
) 2 [ CX [ RS
x C1 L 1 C f1 x C1 Lg
2
0
RS RS C1 C1 ½1 CRS0
\1 ) 1 [ ½1 [ 0; 2 [ 0 & RS [0
C0 C0 x C1 L 1 C0 f1 x C1 Lg
2
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
x2 C1 L 1 [ 0 ) ðx C1 L 1Þ ðx C1 L þ 1Þ [ 0
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
) x C1 L 1 [ 0
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
x C1 L 1 [ 0 ) x C1 L [ 1
1 1 1
) x [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ) 2 p f [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ) f [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
C1 L C1 L 2 p C1 L
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 989
RS
f1 x2 C1 Lg [ 0
C0
RS 1 RS
) ð 1Þ þ x2 C1 L [ 0 ) ð 1Þ þ x2 [ 0
C0 C1 L C0
1 RS 1 RS
ð 1Þ þ x [ 0 ) x
2 2
ð1 Þ [ 0
C1 L C0 C1 L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
x2 ð1 Þ [ 0 ) ½x pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð1 Þ
C1 L C0 C1 L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS
½x þ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð1 Þ [ 0
C1 L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
x pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð1 Þ [ 0 ) x [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð1 Þ
C1 L C0 C1 L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS
) 2 p f [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð1 Þ
C1 L C0
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 RS 1 RS
2 p f [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð1 Þ ) f [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ð1 Þ
C1 L C0 2 p C1 L C0
1
¼ ff [ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffig
2 p C1 L
Case No.1.B:
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ RS ðC1 þ CX Þ
C0 0 ) C0 [ 0
CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1 CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ CX f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 C1 C0
[0
CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ CX f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 C1 C0 \0 &
CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1 \0
RS C1 þ RS CX CX f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 C1 C0 \0 &
C1 \CX fx2 C1 L 1g
CX ½RS f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 \C1 C0 RS C1 & C1 \CX fx2 C1 L 1g
CX ½RS f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 \C1 ½C0 RS & C1 \CX fx2 C1 L 1g
990 Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods
We consider RS f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 [ 0 and x2 C1 L 1 [ 0
Then
C1 ½C0 RS C1
CX \ & CX [ 2
RS f1 x2 C1 Lg C0 x C1 L 1
Then
C1 ½1 CRS0 C1
CX \ RS & CX [
C0 f1 x2 C1 Lg x2 C1 L 1
C1 C1 ½1 CRS0
\CX \
x2 C1 L 1 C0 f1 x C1 Lg
RS 2
C1 C1 ½1 CRS0
ð1Þ [ CX [
x2 C1 L 1 RS
C0 f1 x2 C1 Lg
C1 C1 ½1 CRS0
ð2Þ 2 \CX \ RS
x C1 L 1 C f1 x C1 Lg
2
0
We need to decide which option is feasible for us. We define X as the difference
between out limits bands (UL/LL).
C1 C1 ½1 CRS0
X¼
x2 C1 L 1 CRS f1 x2 C1 Lg
0
C1 C1 ½1 CRS0
X¼
x2 C1 L 1 CRS f1 x2 C1 Lg
h 0
i
C1 CRS0 f1 x2 C1 Lg C1 ½1 CRS0 ½x2 C1 L 1
¼ h i
½x2 C1 L 1 CRS0 f1 x2 C1 Lg
C1 CRS0 C1 f1 x2 C1 Lg ½C1 C1 CRS0 ½x2 C1 L 1
X¼ h i
½x2 C1 L 1 CRS0 f1 x2 C1 Lg
Appendix B: RF Amplifiers Basic and Advance Topics and Design Methods 991
h i
If ½x2 C1 L 1 RS
C0 f1 x2 C1 Lg [ 0 then X [ 0
h i
If ½x2 C1 L 1 CRS0 f1 x2 C1 Lg \0 then X\0
If X [ 0 then
C1 C1 ½1 CRS0
[ CX [
x2 C1 L 1 RS
C0 f1 x2 C1 Lg
If X\0 then
C1 C1 ½1 CRS0
\CX \
x2 C1 L 1 C0 f1 x C1 Lg
RS 2
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ RS ðC1 þ CX Þ
C0 þ D; C0 D 0
CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1 CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ
) ðC0 þ DÞ 0
CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
RS ðC1 þ CX Þ CX f1 x2 C1 Lg ðC0 þ DÞ C1 ðC0 þ DÞ
0
CX f1 x2 C1 Lg þ C1
Appendix C
BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model
and MOSFET Model
IC IC IC IC =IE aF bF
aF ¼ ;b ¼ ;b ¼ ¼ ¼ ; aF ¼ :
IE F IB F IE IC 1 IC =IE 1 aF bF þ 1
Fig. C.1 Bipolar transistor shown as two back to back p-n junction
collector and are swept away by the electric field in the reverse-biased collector–
base junction. For a figure describing forward and reverse bias, see semiconductor
diodes. The bipolar junction transistor can be considered essentially as two p-n
junctions placed back to back, with the base p-type region being common to both
diodes. This can be viewed as two diodes having a common third terminal as shown
in the below figure. The two diodes are not in isolation, but are interdependent. This
means that the total current flowing in each diode is influenced by the conditions
prevailing in the other. In isolation, the two junctions would be characterized by the
normal diode equation with a suitable notation used to differentiate between the two
junctions as can be seen. When the two junctions are combined, to form a transistor,
the base region is shared internally by both diodes even though there is an external
connection to it (Fig. C.1).
In the forward active mode, aF of the emitter current reaches the collector. This
means that aF of the diode current passing through the base-emitter junction con-
tributes to the current flowing through the base-collector junction. Typically, aF has
a value of between 0.98 and 0.99. This is shown as the forward component of
current as it applies to the normal forward active mode of operation of the device.
This current is shown as a conventional current. It is equally possible to reverse the
biases on the junctions to operate the transistor in the “reverse active mode”. In this
case, aR ðar Þ times the collector current will contribute to the emitter current. For the
doping ratios normally used the transistor will be much less efficient in the reverse
mode and aR would typically be in the range 0.1–0.5. The Ebers-Moll transistor
model is an attempt to create an electrical model of the device as two diodes whose
currents are determined by the normal diode law but with additional transfer ratios
to quantify the interdependency of the junctions. Two dependent current sources are
used to indicate the interaction of the junctions. Figure C.2 describes NPN Bipolar
transistor Ebers Moll model.
996 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
Applying Kirchoff’s laws to the model gives the terminal current as:
If we use the notation af Ise ¼ ar Isc ¼ Is ; Isc ¼ aIsr ; Ise ¼ aIsf the following Ebers
Moll equations:
VCE = VCB + VBE, but VCB = −VBC. Then VCE = VBE − VBC.
Remark: there is a use with capital and small letters in the Appendix compares to
book chapter 1, consider the terminology is the same.
VCB VEB
IC þ IDC ¼ af IDE ) IC þ Isc ðe VT 1Þ ¼ af Ise ðe VT 1Þ
VEB VCB
) IC ¼ af Ise ðe VT 1Þ Isc ðe VT 1Þ
VEB VCB
IB ¼ IE IC ¼ ð1 af Þ Ise ðe VT 1Þ þ ð1 ar Þ Isc ðe VT 1Þ:
If we use the notation af Ise ¼ ar Isc ¼ Is ; Isc ¼ aIsr ; Ise ¼ aIsf the following Ebers
Moll equations:
VCE = VCB + VBE, but VCB = −VBC. Then VCE = VBE – VBC.
I C af I E ar IC IE
VCB ¼ VT ln þ 1 ; VEB ¼ VT ln þ1
ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ðar af 1Þ Ise
I C af I E ar I C I E
VBC ¼ VT ln þ 1 ; VBE ¼ VT ln þ1
ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ðar af 1Þ Ise
I C af I E ar I C I E
VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE ¼ VT ln þ 1 VT ln þ1
ðaf ar 1Þ Isc ðar af 1Þ Ise
IC af IE þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE ¼ VT ln
ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
ar IC IE þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
VT ln
ðar af 1Þ Ise
IC af IE þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc Ise
VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE ¼ VT ln
ar IC IE þ ðar af 1Þ Ise Isc
IC af IE þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE ¼ VT ln
ar IC IE þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
Ise Ise
þ VT ln ; Ise Isc ; ln !e
Isc Isc
IC af IE þ ðaf ar 1Þ Isc
VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE VT ln
ar IC IE þ ðar af 1Þ Ise
Table C.1 Summary of our BJT NPN and PNP transistors Ebers-Moll equations
BJT NPN transistor BJT PNP transistor
VBE VBC VBE VBC
IC IC ¼ af Ise ðe VT
1Þ Isc ðe VT
1Þ IC ¼ af Ise ðe VT
1Þ Isc ðe VT
1Þ
VBE VBC VBE VBC
IE IE ¼ Ise ðe 1Þ ar Isc ðe 1Þ
VT VT
IE ¼ Ise ðe VT
1Þ ar Isc ðe VT
1Þ
VBE
IB Is VBE
IB ¼ ð1 af Þ ðe VT 1Þ IB ¼ ð1 af ÞIse ðe VT
1Þ
af VBC
Is VBC þ ð1 ar Þ Isc ðe VT
1Þ
þ ð1 ar Þ ðe VT 1Þ
ar
n o n o
VCE ½a I I þ ða a 1ÞI I af IE þ ðaf ar 1ÞIsc
VCE VT ln ½ICr aC f IEE þ ðarf afr 1ÞIsesc VCE VT ln aCr IC I E þ ðar af 1ÞIse
The BJT transistor base current is much smaller that the emitter and collector
currents in forward active mode. If the collector of an NPN transistor was open
circuit, it would look like a diode. When forward biased, the circuit in the
base-emitter junction would consist of holes injected into the emitter from the base
and electrons injected into the base from the emitter. But since there are many more
electrons in the emitter than holes in the base, the vast majority of the current will be
due to electrons. When the reverse biased collector is added, It “sucks” the electrons
out of the base. Thus, the base-emitter current is due predominantly to hole current
(the smaller current component) while the collector-emitter current is due to elec-
trons (larger current component due to more electrons from the n+ emitter doping).
We define two BJT transistor performance parameters: emitter efficiency (c) and
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1003
base transport factor (aT). Emitter efficiency parameter characterizes how effective
the large hole current is controlled by the small electron current. Unity is best, zero is
worst. Base transport factor characterizes how much of the injected hole current is
lost to recombination in the base. Unity is best, zero is worst.
IEp IEp
c¼ ¼
IE IEp þ IEn
ICp
aT ¼ :
IEp
IC ¼ adc IE þ ICBo ;
and ICBo ¼ ICn . We define some equations in active mode, common emitter
characteristics. ICEo is defined as the collector current when the base is open circuit.
IC is multiple of the base current making it across the base + leakage current.
IC ¼ bdc IB þ ICEo ; Where bdc is the common emitter DC current gain. ICEo is
defines as the collector current when the base is open circuit.
aF ¼ adc is common base current gain. IE ¼ aR IC ; aR 6¼ aDC . In inverse mode,
the emitter current is the fraction of the collector current “collected”.
adc ICBo
IE ¼ IC þ IB ; IC ¼ adc ðIC þ IB Þ þ ICBo ; IC ¼ IB þ
1 adc 1 adc
adc ICBo IC
bdc ¼ ; ICEo ¼ ;b ¼
1 adc 1 adc dc IB
We can break the BJT transistor up into a large signal analysis and a small signal
analysis and “linearize” the non-linear behavior of the Ebers-Moll model. Small
signal models are only useful for forward active mode and thus, are derived under
this condition. Saturation and cutoff are used for switches which involve very large
voltage/current swings from on to off states.
Small signal models are used to determine amplifier characteristics
(“Gain” = increase in the magnitude of a signal at the output of a circuit relative to
its magnitude at the input of the circuit). Just like when a diode voltage exceeds a
certain value, the non-linear behavior of the diode leads to distortion of the
current/voltage curves, if the inputs/outputs exceed certain limits, the full Ebers-Moll
1004 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
model must be used. There are physical meanings of bf (bF) and br (bR). bF is the
current gain (IC/IB) of the device when it is operating with the emitter as the emitter
and the collector as the collector in the active mode. bR is the current gain of the
device when it is operating with the emitter as a collector and the collector as an
emitter in the reverse mode. The BJT device is made to have higher forward current
gain than reverse current gain. The terminals for emitter and collector are not
completely interchangeable due to different doping of the collector and emitter.
BJTtransistor modes of operation:
The Ebers-Moll BJT model is a good large signal, steady-state model of the
transistor and allows the state of conduction of the device to be easily determined
for different modes of operation of the device. The different modes of operation are
determined by the manner in which the junctions are biased. BJT NPN transistor
Ebers-Moll BJT model:
VBE VBC VBE
IC ¼ af Ise ðe VT 1Þ Isc ðe VT 1Þ; IE ¼ Ise ðe VT 1Þ
VBC
ar Isc ðe VT 1Þ
Is VBE Is VBC
IB ¼ ð1 af Þ ðe VT 1Þ þ ð1 ar Þ ðe VT 1Þ;
af ar
Is Is
af Ise ¼ ar Isc ¼ Is ; Isc ¼ ; Ise ¼
ar af
VBE VBC
IB ¼ ð1 af Þ Ise ðe VT 1Þ þ ð1 ar Þ Isc ðe VT 1Þ
Relatively large.
VBE VBE VBE
IC ’ af Ise e VT þ Isc af Ise e VT ¼ af IE ; af Ise e VT Isc ;
Relatively large.
VBE VBE
IB ’ ð1 af Þ Ise e VT ð1 ar Þ Isc ð1 af Þ Ise e VT
VBE
¼ ð1 af Þ IE ; ð1 af Þ Ise e VT ð1 ar Þ Isc
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1005
Moderately high.
VBC VBC VBC
IC ’ af Ise Isc e VT Isc e VT ; Isc e VT af Ise ; Moderate:
VBC VBC VBC
IB ’ ð1 af Þ Ise þ ð1 ar Þ Isc e VT ð1 ar Þ Isc e VT ; ð1 ar Þ Isc e VT
ð1 af Þ Ise
It is as high as 0.5 |IC|. This mode does not provide useful amplification but is
used, mainly, for current steering in switching circuits, e.g. TTL.
(C) Cut-off mode:
B-E is unbiased, VBE = 0 v. B-C is reverse biased, VBC negative.
VBE VBE VBC VBC
e VT ¼ 1; ðe VT 1Þ ! e ¼ 0; e VT
1; ðe VT 1Þ 1
VBE 0:8 V; VBC 0:7 V; VCE ¼ VCB þ VBE ; VCB ¼ VBC ; VCE ¼ VBE VBC
¼ 0:1 V
There is a 0.1 V drop across the transistor from collector to emitter which is
quite low while a substantial current flows through the device. In this mode it can be
considered as having a very high conductivity and acts as a closed switch with a
finite resistance and conductivity (Fig. C.5).
BJT transistor avalanche breakdown region of operation:
An avalanche transistor is a bipolar junction transistor designed for operation in
the region of its collector-current/collector-to-emitter voltage characteristics beyond
the collector-to-emitter breakdown voltage, called avalanche breakdown region.
This region characterized by avalanche breakdown, a phenomenon similar to
Negative Differential Resistance (NDR). Operation in the avalanche breakdown
region is called avalanche-mode operation. It gives avalanche transistors the ability
to switch very high currents with less than nanosecond rise and fall times (transition
times). Transistors not specifically designed for the purpose can have reasonably
consistent avalanche properties.
Static avalanche regioncharacteristics: The static characteristic of an avalanche
transistor is IC-VCE. The static characteristic of an avalanche NPN transistor is the
same as PNP devices only changing sign to voltages and currents accordingly. The
avalanche breakdown multiplication is present only across the collector-base
junction. The first step of the calculation is to determine collector current as a sum
of various component currents through the collector since only those fluxes of
charge are subject to this phenomenon. Applying Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL) to
a bipolar junction transistor, implies the following relation which satisfied by the
collector current IC (IC = IE − IB) while for the same device working in the active
region. a ¼ af ; b ¼ bf ; IC ¼ b IB þ ðb þ 1Þ ICBo , IB is the base current. ICBo is the
collector-base reverse leakage current. IE is the emitter current. B is the common
emitter current gain of the transistor. Equating the two formulas for IC gives the
following result
IE ¼ ðb þ 1Þ IB þ ðb þ 1Þ ICBo and since a ¼ b þb 1; a is the common base
current gain of the transistor, then
When the avalanche effects in a transistor collector are considered, the collector
current IC is given by IC ¼ M ða IE þ ICBo Þ. M is miller’s avalanche multipli-
cation coefficient. It is the most important parameter in avalanche mode operation
M¼ 1
VCB n . BVCBo is the collector-base breakdown voltage. n is a constant
1ðBV Þ
CBo
depending on the semiconductor used for the construction of the transistor and
doping profile of the collector-base junction. VCB is the collector-base voltage.
Using Kirchhoff’s current law (KCL) for the bipolar junction transistor and the
expression for M, the resulting expression for IC is the following:
M a IB þ ICBo
IC ¼ ða IB þ ICBo Þ ) IC ¼
ð1 a MÞ 1 a ðBV VCB n
Þ
CBo
a IB þ ICBo a IB þ ICBo
IC ¼ VBE ðIB Þ n
’ VCE n
1a ðVCEBV Þ 1 a ðBV CBo
Þ
CBo
1008 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
Since VCE VBE . This is the expression of the parametric family of the col-
lector characteristics IC–VCE with parameter IB (IC) increases without limit if
Small signal model of the BJT, base charging capacitance (diffusion capaci-
tance). In active mode when the emitter-base is forward biased, the capacitance of
the emitter-base junction is dominated by the diffusion capacitance (not depletion
capacitance). Recall for a diode we define the following: CDiffusion ¼ dQ
dv0 ¼ dt dv0 .
D dQD dt
D D
The sum up all minority carrier charges on either side of the junction.
Z1 v0
Z1 v0
If we neglect charge injected from the base into the emitter due to p+ emitter in
R1 v0
D X
PNP then QD ¼ q A 0 pno ðeVT 1Þ e LP dX. Excess charge stored is due
almost entirely to the charge injected from the emitter. The BJT acts like a very
efficient “siphon”; As majority carriers from the emitter are injected into the base
and become “excess minority carriers”, the collector “siphons them” out of the
base. We can view the collector current as the amount of excess charge in the base
collected by the collector per unit time and we can express the charge due to the
excess hole concentration in the base as: QB ¼ ic sF or the excess charge in the
base depends on the magnitude of current flowing and the “forward” base transport
W2
time, sF , the average time the carriers spend in the base. sF ¼ 2D B
, W is the base
quasi-neutral region width. DBis the minority carrier diffusion coefficient. Thus, the
diffusion capacitance is
@QB W2 @ic IC
CB ¼ jQpoint ¼ ð Þ j ; C B ¼ sF ¼ s F gm :
@vBE 2 DB @vBE Qpoint VT
The upper operational frequencyof the transistor is limited by the forward base
transport time f 2ps
1
F
. It is the similarity to the diode diffusion capacitance.
jpno Lp þ npo Ln j q A
CDiffusion ¼ gd st ; st ¼ ;
IS
jpno Lp þ npo Ln j q A
CDiffusion ¼ gd
IS
st is the transit time. In active mode for small forward biases the depletion
capacitance of the base-emitter junction can contribute to the total capacitance.
CjEo
CjE ¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
1 þ Vbi for Vemitterbase
EB
W V2
IDS ¼ l0 Cox ½ðVGS VTH Þ VDS DS ½1 þ k VDS
Leff 2
1 W
IDSsat ¼ l0 Cox ðVGS VTH Þ2 ½1 þ k VDS
2 Leff
1012 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
KP W
IDsat ¼ ðVGS VTH Þ2 ½1 þ k VDS
2 ðL 2 Xjl Þ
where VTO is the threshold voltage when the body-source voltage is zero, c is the
body effect parameter and Up is the surface inversion potential. If the bulk is
connected to the source (i.e. the MOSFET is acting as a 3 terminal device, the
threshold voltage is always equal to the value VTO). There is a depletion layer
which grows into the accumulation region and thus for a given VGS, cuts off the
channel. Need to add more VGS to re-establish the channel when we stacked
transistors in integrated circuits. If you connected bulk to source on each transistor
in an integrated circuit you would end up shorting many points in the circuit to
ground.
Complete DC model:
The model includes body-source and body-drain diodes. Equations used for the
diode model, for forward bias on the body-source/body-drain diodes (Fig. C.9):
VBS
h VBD i
IBS ¼ ISS ½e Vt 1 þ GMIN VBS ; IBD ¼ ISD e Vt 1 þ GMIN VBD
VBS VBD
IBS ¼ ISS þ GMIN VBS ; IBD ¼ ISD þ GMIN VBD
Vt Vt
MOSFET body diodes: The reverse bias terms are simply the first terms in a
power series expansion of the exponential term. The GMIN convergence resistance.
ISS and ISD are taken to be one constant in simulation.
DC MOSFET parameters: L = channel length, W = channel width, KP
(kp) = The trans-conductance parameter, VTO = Threshold voltage under zero bias
conditions, GAMMA (c) = Body effect parameter, PHI(Up) = surface inversion
potential, RS(RS) = source contact resistance, RD(RD) = Drain contact resistance,
LAMBDA(k) = channel length modulation parameter, XJ(Xjl) = lateral diffusion
parameter. IS(ISS, ISD) = reverse saturation current of body-drain/source diodes.
Large signal transient model: We add some capacitances to the DC model to
create the transient model to form the final transient model, as shown in Fig. C.10).
Capacitances: Static overlap capacitances between gate and drain (CGB0), gate
and source (CGS0), and gate and bulk (CGB0). These are fixed values, and are
specified per unit width. In saturation,
2
CGS ¼ C0x þ CGS0 W; CGD ¼ CGD0 W
3
In saturation after pinch-off, it is assumed that altering the drain voltage does not
have any effect on stored charge in the channel and thus the only capacitance
between gate and drain is the overlap capacitance.
In the linear/triode region, in this region the following equations are used:
( 2 )
VGS VDS VTH
CGS ¼ C0x 1 þ CGS0 W
2 ðVGS VTH Þ VDS
( 2 )
VGS VTH
CGD ¼ C0x 1 þ CGD0 W
2 ðVGS VTH Þ VDS
As the device is moved further into the linear region, VGS becomes large
compared to (VDS–VTH) then the values of CGS and CGD become close to C0x/2
(plus the relevant overlap capacitance).
The body diode capacitances: The capacitances of the body diodes are given by
slightly modified expressions for junction capacitances of the diode model: The
C ð0Þ
expression for a PN diode capacitance: Cj ¼ pjffiffiffiffiffiffiffiVffi. The MOSFET equation is
1V
0
The junction capacitance is made up of two components. The main component, due
to Cj(0) is the normal junction capacitance. The second parameter is the perimeter
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1015
d 2 n0 n0 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi d 2 n0 n0
¼ 2 ; LB ¼ sB DB ; 2 ¼ :
dx 2 LB dx sB DB
sB and DB are the recombination lifetime and the minority carrier (electron)
diffusion constant in the base, respectively. The boundary conditions are as follow:
qVBE qVBC
n0 ð0Þ ¼ nB0 ðe kT 1Þ; n0 ðWB Þ ¼ nB0 ðe kT 1Þ nB0 0:
n2
where nB0 ¼ NiB and NB is the base doping concentration. VBE is normally a
forward bias (positive value) and VBC is a reverse bias (negative value).
WB x
sinhð LB Þ
qVBE
We get the following expression for n0 ðxÞ ¼ nB0 ðe kT 1Þ W . Modern
sinhð L B Þ
B
BJTs have base widths of about 0.1 lm. This is much smaller than the typical
diffusion length of tens of microns. In the case of WB
LB we get the n0 ðxÞ
n2 qVBE
expression: n0 ðxÞ ¼ n0 ð0Þ ð1 WxB Þ ¼ NiBB ðe kT 1Þ ð1 WxB Þ. niB is the intrinsic
carrier concentration of the base material. The subscript B, is added to ni because
the base may be made of a different semiconductor such as SiGe alloy, which has a
smaller band gap and therefore a larger ni than the emitter and collector material.
The minority carrier current is dominated by the diffusion current. The sign of IC is
positive and defined in the expression:
dn n0 ð0Þ DB n2iB
qVBE
IC ¼ AE q DB ¼ AE q DB ¼ AE q ðe kT 1Þ:
dx WB WB N B
AE is the area of the BJT specifically the emitter area. There is a similarity between
BJT transistor IC current and the PN diode IV relation. Both are proportional to
qV Dn2i dn0
ðekT 1Þ and to N . The only difference is that dx has produced the W1B term due to the
qVBE
linear n′ profile. We can condense the expression of IC to IC ¼ Is ðe kT 1Þ, where
qn2i qVBE n2
Is is the saturation current. IC ¼ AE GB ðe kT 1Þ and GB ¼ n2i DNBB WB
iB
n2i
¼ n2iB
p
DB WB , where p is the majority carrier concentration in the base. It is valid even
1018 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
forward biasing the BE junction. The analysis of IB, the base to emitter injection
current, is a perfect parallel of the IC analysis. The base current can be expressed as
ZWE
q n2i qVBE n2i p
IB ¼ AE ðe kT 1Þ; GE ¼ dx:
GE n2iE DE
0
DE n2iE qVBE
IB ¼ A E q ðe kT 1Þ:
WE NE
Current gain: The most important DC parameter of a BJT is its common emitter
current gain bF. Another current ratio, the common base current gain, is defined by
aF. bF IICB ; IC ¼ aF IE ; aF ¼ IICE ¼ IC IþC IB ¼ ICI=IC =I B
B þ1
¼ 1 þbFb . aF is typically very
F
Fig. C.15 NPN transistor structure electron flow and hole flow
1020 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
narrowing of the emitter band gap relative to lightly doped Si and is negligible for
NE < 1018 cm−3, 50 meV at 1019 cm−3, 95 meV cm−3 at 1020 cm−3, and 140 meV
at 1021 cm−3. To further elevate bF, we can raise niB by using a base material that
has a smaller band gap than the emitter material. Si1g Geg is an excellent base
material candidate for an Si emitter. With η = 0.2, EgB is reduced by 0.1 eV. In a
SiGe BJT, the base is made of high quality P-type epitaxial SiGe. In practice, η is
graded such that η = 0 at the emitter end of the base and 0.2 at the drain end to
create a built in field that improves the speed of the BJT. Because the emitter and
base junction is made of two different semiconductors, the device is known as a
heterojunction bipolar transistor or HBT. HBTs made of InP emitter (Eg = 1.35 eV)
and InGaAs base (Eg = 0.68 eV) and GaAlAs emitter with GaAs base are other
examples of well-studied HBTs. The ternary semiconductors are used to achieve
lattice constant matching at the heterojunction. Whether the base material is SiGe or
plain Si, a high performance BJT would have a relatively thick (>100 nm) layer of
As doped N+ poly-Si film in the emitter. Arsenic is thermally driven into the “base”
by *20 nm and converts that single crystalline layer into a part of the N+ emitter.
This way, bF is larger due to the large WE, mostly made of the N+ poly-Si. This is
the poly-Silicon emitter technology. The simpler alternative, a deeper implanted or
diffused N+ emitter without the poly-Si film, is known to produce a higher density
of crystal defects in the thin base causing excessive emitters to collector leakage
current or even shorts in a small number of the BJTs. High speed circuits operate at
high IC, and low power circuits may operate at low IC. Current gain b, drops at both
high IC and at low IC. In Gummel plot the IC flattens at high VBE due to the high
level injection effect in the base. That IC curve arising from hole injection into the
emitter, does not flatten due to this effect because the emitter is very heavily doped,
and it is practically impossible to inject a higher density of holes than NE. Over a
wide mid-range of IC, IC and IB are parallel, indicating that the ratio IC/IB, i.e., bF is
a constant. Above 1mA, the slope of IC drops due to high level injection.
Consequently, the IC/IB ratio or bF decreases rapidly. This fall-off of current gain
unfortunately degrades the performance of BJTs at high current where the BJTs
speed is the highest. IB is the base emitter junction forward bias current. The
forward bias current slope decreases at low VBE or very low current due to the
Space Charge Region (SCR) current. As a result, the IC/IB ratio or bF decreases at
very low IC.
@IC
As in MOSFETs, a large output conductance, @V CE
, of BJTs is deleterious to the
voltage gain of circuits. The cause of the output conductance is base-width modu-
lation. The thick vertical line indicates the location of the base-collector junction.
With increasing Vce, the base-collector depletion region widens and the neutral base
width decreases. This leads to an increase in IC. If the curves IC–VCE are extrapo-
lated, they intercept the IC = 0 axis at approximately the same point. VA is defined as
early voltage. VA is a parameter that describes the flatness of the IC curves.
@IC 1
Specifically, the output resistance can be expressed as VA/IC: r0 ð@V CE
Þ ¼ VICA .
A large VA (large r0) is desirable for high voltage gains. A typical VA is 50 V. VA is
sensitive to the transistor design. We can except VA and r0 to increase, expect the
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1021
base width modulation to be a smaller fraction of the base width, if we increase the
base width, increase the base doping concentration NB or decrease the collector
doping concentration NC. Increasing the base width would reduce the sensitivity to
any given DWB. Increasing the base doping concentration NB would reduce the
depletion region thickness on the base side because the depletion region penetrates
less into the more heavily doped side of a PN junction. Decreasing the collector
doping concentration NC would tend to move the depletion region into the collector
and thus reduce the depletion region thickness on the base side, too. Both increasing
the base width and the base doping concentration NB would depress bF. Decreasing
the collector doping concentration NC is the most acceptable course of action. It is
also reduces the base-collector junction capacitance, which is a good thing.
Therefore, the collector doping is typically ten times lighter than the base doping.
The larger slopes at VCE > 3v are caused by impact ionization. The rise of IC due to
base-width modulation is known as the early effect. Model the collector current as a
function of the collector voltage: IC ¼ bF IB and differentiating with respect to VC
@IC @bF
while IB was held constant gave, @V C
¼ IB @V C
. The question is how can bF change
with VC, the collector depletion layer thickens as collector voltage is raised. The base
gets thinner and current gain raises. Bipolar transistor transit time and charge stor-
age: Static IV characteristics are only one part of the BJT theory. Another part is its
dynamic behavior or its speed. When the BE junction is forward biased, excess holes
are stored in the emitter, the base, and even the depletion layers. The sum of all
excess hole charges everywhere QF. QF is the stored excess carrier charge. If
QF = 1pC (Pico coulomb), there is +1 pC of excess hole charge and −1 pC of excess
electron charge stored in the BJT. The ratio of QF to IC is called the forward transit
time sF (sF QICF ). Ic and QF are related by a constant ratio sF. QF and therefore sF are
very difficult to predict accurately for a complex device structure. sF can be measured
experimentally and once sF is determined for a given BJT, equation sF QICF
becomes a powerful conceptual and mathematical tool giving QF as a function of IC,
and vice versa. sF sets a high frequency limit of BJT operation. The excess hole
W2
charge in the base QFB: QFB ¼ q AE n0 ð0Þ WB =2; QICFB sFB ¼ 2DBB . The base
transit time can be further reduced by building into the base a drift field that aids the
flow of electrons from the emitter to the collector. There are two ways of accom-
plishing this. The classical method is to use graded base doping (a large NB near the
EB junction), which gradually decreases toward the CB junction. Such a doping
gradient is automatically achieved if the base is produced by dopant diffusion. The
changing NB creates a dEv =dx and a dEc =dx. This means that there is a drift field.
Any electron injected into the base would drift toward the collector with a base
W2
transit time shorter than the diffusion transit time, 2DBB . In a SiGe BJT, P-type
epitaxial Si1g Geg is grown over the Si collector with a constant NB and η linearly
varying from about 0.2 at the collector end to 0 at the emitter end. A large dEc =dx can
be produced by the grading of EgB . These high speed BJTs are used in high fre-
quency communication circuits. Drift transistors can have a base transit time several
1022 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
W2
times less than 2DBB , as short as 1psec. The total forward transit time, sF is known as
the emitter to collector transit time. sFB is only one portion of sF. The base transit
time typically contributes about half of sF. To reduce the transit (or storage) time in
the emitter and collector, the emitter and the depletion layers must be kept thin. sF
can be measured. sF starts to increase at a current density where the electron density
corresponding to the dopant density in the collector (n = NC) is insufficient to
support the collector current even if the dopant induced electrons move at the
saturation velocity. This intriguing condition of too few dopant atoms and too much
current is lead to a reversal of the sign of the charge density in the depletion region.
IC d}ðxÞ q
IC ¼ AE q n vsat ; q ¼ q NC q n ¼ q NC ; ¼ :
AE vsat dx es
Model parameters are difficult to predict from theory with the accuracy required for
commercial circuit design. Therefore, the parameters are routinely determined
through comprehensive measurement of the BJT AC and DC characteristics.
Figure C.17 describes the small signal model which can be used to analyze a
BJT circuit by hand.
Cutoff frequency: We consider small signal model when the load is a short
circuit. The signal source is a current source ib, at a frequency f. The question is at
what frequency the AC current gain does b ic =ib fall to unity?
ib ib
vbe ¼ ¼ ; ic ¼ gm vbe
input admittance 1=rp þ j x Cp
ic gm 1
bðxÞ ¼ ¼
ib j1=rp þ j x Cp j j1=gm rp þ j x sF þ j x CdBE =gm j
1
¼
j1=bF þ j x sF þ j x CdBE k T=q IC j
1024 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
Fig. C.17 Bipolar transistor small signal model which can be used to analyze a BJT circuit by
hand
Fig. C.18 Bipolar transistor small signal model for circuit simulation
Figure C.18 describes the small signal model for circuit simulation by computer.
At x = 0, i.e., DC b(x) = … equation reduces to bF as expected. As x increases,
b drops. By carefully analyzing the b(x) data, one can determine sF. If bF 1 so
that 1/bF is negligible, bðxÞ / x1 and b = 1 at fT , fT ¼ 2pðsF þ CdBE 1
kT=qIC Þ.
If we use a more complete small signal model, it can be shown that
fT ¼ 2p½sF þ ðCdBE þ CdBC ÞkT=ðqI
1
C Þ þ CdBC ðre þ rc Þ
. fT is the cutoff frequency and is com-
monly used to compare the speed of transistors. The above equations predict that fT
rises with increasing IC due to increasing gm, in agreement with the measured fT. At
very high IC, sF increases due to base widening (Kirk effect), and therefore, fT falls.
BJTs are often biased near the IC where fT peaks in order to obtain the best high
frequency performance. FT is the frequency of unity power gain. The frequency of
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1025
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
unity power gain, called the maximum oscillation frequency. fmax ¼ ð8prfbTCdBC Þ, it
is therefore important to reduce the base resistance, rb. While MOSFET scaling is
motivated by the need for high packing density and large Idsat, BJT scaling is often
motivated by the need for high fT and fmax. This involves the reduction of sF (thin
base, etc,) and the reduction of parasitic (CdBE ; CdBC ; rb ; re ; rc ). We interested in
BJT with poly-Si emitter, self-aligned base, and deep trench isolation. The base is
contacted through two small P+ regions created by boron diffusion from a P+
poly-Si film. The film also provides a low resistance electrical connection to the
base without introducing a large P+ junction area and junction capacitance. To
minimizing the base series resistance, the emitter opening is made very narrow. The
lightly doped epitaxial N-type collector is contacted through a heavily doped
sub-collector in order to minimize the collector series resistance. The substrate is
lightly doped to minimize the collector capacitance. Both the shallow trench and the
deep trench are filled with dielectrics (SiO2) and serve the function of electrical
isolation. The deep trench forms a rectangular moat that completely surrounds the
BJT. It isolates the collector of this transistor from the collectors of neighboring
transistors. The structure incorporates many improvements that have been devel-
oped over the past decades and have greatly reduced the device size from older BJT
design. BJT is a larger transistor than a MOSFET.
Bipolar transistor charge control model: The small signal model is ideal for
analyzing circuit response to small sinusoidal signals. If the signal is large, input is
step function IB switching from zero to 20 lA or by any IB(t) and then IC(t) is
produced. The response is analyzed with the charge control model which is a simple
extension of the charge storage concept. IC ¼ QsFF ) IC ðtÞ ¼ QsFFðtÞ, IC(t) becomes
known if we solve for QF ðtÞ. sF has to be characterized beforehand for the BJT being
used. IC is controlled by QF (charge control model). At DC condition IB ¼ bIC ¼ sFQbF ,
F F
the equation has a straightforward physical meaning. In order to sustain a constant
excess hole charge in the transistor, holes must be supplied to the transistor through
IB to replenish the holes that are lost to recombination. Therefore, DC IB is pro-
portional to QF. When holes are supplied by IB at the rate of QF =sF bF , the rate of
hole supply is exactly equal to the rate of hole loss to recombination and QF remains
at a constant value. In the case that IB is larger than QF =sF bF .
(IB [ QF =sF bF ), holes flow into the BJT at a higher rate than the rate of hole
loss and the stored hole charge QF increases with time (dQ dt ¼ IB ðtÞ sF bF ).
F QF
The presented equations together constitute the basic charge control model.
For any given IB(t), equation dQ dt ¼ IB ðtÞ sF bF can be solved for QF(t) ana-
F QF
The 1 þ VVCBA factor is added to represent the early effect—IC increasing with
increasing VCB. Is0 differs from Is in that Is0 decreases at high VBE due to the high
level injection effect in accordance with equation
ZWB
n2i p
GB dx:
n2iB DB
0
ISE and nE parameters are determined from the measured BJT data as are all of
the several dozens of model parameters. We can summery the current appendix
discussion, that base emitter junction is usually forward biased while the
base-collector junction is reverse biased. VBE determines the rate of electron
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1027
Fig. C.20 Bipolar transistor BJT model used for circuit simulation
injection from the emitter into the base, and thus uniquely determines the collector
current, IC regardless of the reverse bias VCB.
ZWB
q n2i qVBE n2i p
IC ¼AE ðe kT 1Þ; GB dx
GB n2iB DB
0
GB is the base Gummel number, which represents all the subtleties of BJT
design that affects IC; base material, non-uniform base doping, non-uniform ma-
terial composition, and the high level injection effect. An undesirable but
unavoidable side effect of the application on VBE is a hole current flowing from the
base, mostly into the emitter. This base input current, IB, is related to IC by the
common emitter current gain bF (bF ¼ IICB GGEB ) where GE is the emitter Gummel
number. The common base current gain is aF IICE ¼ 1 þbFb . The Gummel plot
F
1028 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
indicates that bF falls off in the high IC region due to high level injection in the base
and also in the low IC region due to excess base current. Base width modulation by
VCB results in a significant slope of the IC-VCEcurve in the active region. This is the
early effect. The slope, called the output conductance, limits the voltage gain that
can be produced with a BJT. The early effect can be suppressed with a lightly doped
collector. A heavily doped sub-collector is routinely used to reduce the collector
resistance. Due to the forward bias, VBE, a BJT stores a certain amount of excess
hole charge, which is equal but of opposite sign to the excess electron charge. Its
magnitude is called the excess carrier charge, QF. QF is linearly proportional to IC
(QF IC sF ).
sF is the forward transit time. If there were no excess carriers stored outside the
W2
base sF ¼ sFB ¼ 2DBB . sFB is the base transit time, sF [ sFB because excess carrier
storage in the emitter and in the depletion layer is also significant. All these regions
should be made small in order to minimize sF. Besides minimizing the base width,
WB, sFB may be reduced by building a drift field into the base with graded base
doping (also with graded Ge content in a SiGe base). sFB is significantly increased
at large IC due to base widening which known at the Kirk effect. In the Gummel
Poon model, both the DC and the dynamic (charge storage) currents are well
modeled. The early effect and high level injection effect are included. Simpler
models consisting of R, C, and current source are used for hand analysis of circuits.
The small signal models employ parameters such as trans-conductance gm ¼ dV dIC
BE
¼
IC = kT
q and input capacitance Cp ¼ dVBE ¼ dVBE ½sF IC ¼ sF gm and input resis-
dQF d
bF
tance rp ¼ dVdIB ¼ gm . The BJT’s unity gain cutoff frequency at which b falls to unity
BE
is fT. In order to raise device speed, device density, or current gain, a modern high
performance BJT usually employs poly-Si emitter, self-aligned poly-Si base con-
tacts, graded Si-Ge base, shallow oxide trench, and deep trench isolation. High
performance BJTs excel over MOSFETs in circuits requiring the highest device gm
and speed.
Gummel-Pooncharge control model: The Gummel-Poon model is a detailed
charge-controlled model of BJT dynamics, which has been adopted and elaborated
by others to explain transistor dynamics in greater detail than the terminal-based
models typically do. This model also includes the dependence of transistor b values
upon the DC current levels in the transistor, which are assumed current independent
in the Ebers-Moll model. A significant effect included in the Gummel-Poon model
is the DC current variation of the transistor bF and bR. When certain parameters are
omitted, the Gummel-Poon model reverts to the simpler Ebers-Moll model. The
basic circuit which describes the Gummel-Poon model is the large signal schematic.
It represents the physical transistor, a current-controlled output current sink, and
two diode structures including their capacitors (Fig. C.21).
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1029
We can derive from the Gummel-Poon large signal schematics of the bipolar
transistor the Small Signal (SS) schematics for high frequency simulations. This
mean, for a given operating point, the DC currents are calculated and the model is
linearized in this point. The schematic is a pure linear model. The AC Small Signal
(SS) schematic of bipolar transistor is described in Fig. C.22.
For simplicity we assume no voltage drops at RBB′, Rc, RE then VB′E′ = VBE,
VB′C′ = VBC, VC′E′ = VCE.
The Gummel-Poon BJT full model analysis: The Gummel-Poon model is a
compact model for bipolar junction transistors (BJT) which also takes into account
effects of low currents and at high level injection (Fig. C.23).
Remark: we consider no voltage drop on RBB′, Rc, RE (VEE0 ! e; VCC0 ! e;
VBB0 ! e).
Gmin is the minimum conductance which is automatically switched in parallel to
each PN junction.
1030 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
Iss qVbe
Iss qVbc Iss qVbe qVbc
Icc ¼ ðenf kB T 1Þ; Iec ¼ ðenr kB T 1Þ; Ict ¼ Icc Iec ¼ ðenf kB T enr kB T Þ
qb qb qb
Iec Iss qVbc I cc I ss
qVbe
The model distinguishes four operating region: normal active region, inverse
region, saturated region, and off region.
Normal active region:
5 nf k B T 5 nr k B T
Vbe [ ; Vbc
q q
Is q Vbe qb Vbe 1 1
Ic ¼ ½expð Þ þ þ C4 Is þ ½ ð þ Þ Vbc Gmin
qb nf k B T br qb q b br
Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model 1031
1 q Vbe 1 q Vbe
Ib ¼ Is ½ ½expð Þ 1 þ C2 Is ½expð Þ 1
bf nf k B T br nel kB T
Vbe Vbc
C4 Is þ ð þ Þ Gmin
bf br
5nf kB T
Inverse region: Vbe q ; Vbc [ 5nr qkB T
Is q Vbc qb q Vbc
Ic ¼ fexpð Þ þ ½expð Þ 1g
qb nr k B T br nr k B T
q Vbc Vbe 1 1
C4 Is ½expð Þ 1 þ ½ ð þ Þ Vbc Gmin
ncl kB qb q b br
1032 Appendix C: BJT Transistor Ebers-Moll Model and MOSFET Model
1 q Vbe 1 q Vbe
Ib ¼ Is ½ ½expð Þ 1 þ C2 Is ½expð Þ 1
bf nf k B T br nel kB T
Vbe Vbc
C4 Is þ ð þ Þ Gmin
bf br
5nf kB T
Saturated region: Vbe [ q ; Vbc [ 5nr qkB T
1 q Vbe 1 q Vbc
Ib ¼ Is f ½expð Þ 1 þ ½expð Þ 1g
bf nf k B T br nr k B T
q Vbe q Vbc Vbe Vbc
þ C2 Is ½expð Þ 1 þ C4 Is ½expð Þ 1 þ ð þ Þ Gmin
nel kB t ncl kB T bf br
5nf kB T
Off region:Vbe q ; Vbc 5nr qkB T
Is Vbe 1 1
Ic ¼ þ C 4 Is þ ½ ð þ Þ Vbc Gmin ;
br qb q b br
bf þ br Vbe Vbc
Ib ¼ Is ½ ðC2 þ C4 Þ Is þ ð þ Þ Gmin
bf br bf br
By disconnecting all capacitor in Gummel-Poon BJT full model we get the NPN
Gummel-Poon static model (Fig. C.24).
References
20. Flower, A. C., & Mcguinnless, M. J. (1982). A description of the Lorenz attractor at high
prandtl number. Physica 5D, 149–182.
21. Dullin, H. R., Schmidt, S., Richter, P. H., & Grossmann, S. K. (2005, April 12). Extended
phase diagram of the Lorenz model.
22. Sprott, J. C. Simplifications of the Lorenz attractor. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and
Life Sciences, 13(3), 271–278.
23. van der Schrier, G., & Mass, L. R. M. (2000). The diffusionless Lorenz equations;
Shil’nikov bifurcations and reduction to an explicit map. Physica D, 141, 19–36.
24. Marton, L. (1974). Advanced electronics and electron physics (Vol. 35). USA: Academic
Press Inc. Elsevier.
25. Cripps, S. C. (2006). RF power amplifiers for wireless communication. London: Artech
House microwave library.
26. Sayre, C. W. Complete wireless design. New York: McGraw-Hill companies.
27. Gopalsamy, K. Stability and oscillation in delay differential equations of population
dynamics. Berlin: Kluwer Academic publishers.
28. Kuznetsov, Y. (2010). Elements of applied bifurcation theory [Paperback]. NY, LLC:
Springer.
29. Butcher, E. A., Ma, H., Bueler, E., Averina, V., & Szabo, Z. (2004). Stability of linear time
periodic delay differential equations via Chebyshev polynomials. International Journal of
Numerical Methods Engineering, 59, 895–922.
30. Stepan, G., Insperger, T., & Szalai, R. (2005). Delay, parametric excitation, and the
nonlinear dynamics of cutting process. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 15
(9), 2783–2798.
31. Insperger, T., & Stepan, G. (2003). Stability of the damped Mathieu equation with time
delay. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 125.
32. Garg, N. K., Mann, B. P., Kim, N. H., & Kurdi, M. H. (2007, March). Stability of a time
delayed system with parametric excitation. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and
Control, 129.
33. Allan, W. S. (2005). Understanding microwaves. New York: Wiley.
34. Rogers, J. W. M., Plett, C., & Marsland, I. (2014). Radio frequency system architecture and
design. London: Artech house.
35. Linkhart, D. K. (2014). Microwave circulator design (2nd ed.). London: Artech house.
36. Tanaka, S., Shimomura, N., & Ohtake, K. (1965, March). Active circulators—The
realization of circulators using transistors. Proceedings of the IEEE, 260–267.
37. Dougherty, R. (1989, June). Circulate signals with active devices on monolithic chips.
Microwave and RF, 85–86, 89.
38. Looss, G., & Joseph, D. D. (1980). Elementary stability and bifurcation theory. Berlin:
Springer.
39. Guckenheimer, J., & Holmes, P. (1983). Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and
bifurcation of vector fields. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 42.
40. Perko, L. (1991). Differential equations and dynamics systems. Texts in Applied
Mathematics, 7.
41. Kuang, J., & Cong, Y. (2005). Stability of numerical methods for delay differential
equations. USA: Since press USA Inc.
42. Hollenstein, C., Guittienne, p., & Howling, A. A. Resonant RF network antennas for
large-area and large-volume inductively coupled plasma sources.
43. Granas, A., & Dugundji, J. (2003, July 24). Fixed point theory. Berlin: Springer.
44. Border, K. C. (1989, July 28). Fixed point theorems with application to economics and
game theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Rep sub edition).
45. Agarwal, R. P., Meehan, M., &O’Regan, D. (2009, March 19). Fixed point theory and
applications (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Istratescu, V. I. (2001, November 30). Fixed point theory: An introduction. Berlin:
Springer.
References 1037
47. Geller, S. B., & Mantek, P. A. (1962, January–March). Tunnel diode large-signal
equivalent circuit study and the solutions of its nonlinear differential equations. Journal of
research of the National Bureau of Standards—C. Engineering and Instrumentation, 66C
(1).
48. Hines, M. E. (1960). High-frequency negative-resistance circuit principles for Esaki diode
applications. Bell System Technical Journal, 39, 477.
49. Cohen, S. (1960). Tunnel diode characterization. Electric Equipment & Engineering, 8,
102.
50. Lowry, H. R., Giorgis, J., Gottlieb, E., & Weischedel, R. C. (1961). Tunnel diode manual.
General Electric, 33–42.
51. Lefshetz, S. (1957). Differential equations: Geometric theory (p. 261). Geneva: Interscience
Publishers.
52. Hsia, P. S. (1952). A graphical analysis for nonlinear systems. Proceeding of IEEE, 99,
125.
53. Crisson, G. (1931). Negative impedances in the twin 21 type repeater. Bell System
Technical Journal, 10, 485.
54. Gautam, A. K., & Vishvakarma, B. R. (2006). Frequency agile microstrip antenna using
symmetrically loaded tunnel diodes. Indian Journal of Radio & Space physics, 35, 212–
216.
55. Srivastava, S., & Vishvakarma, B. R. (1999). Tunnel diode integrated rectangular patch
antenna. In Proceeding of the Radar Symposium India-99 (IRSI-99), Bangalore.
56. Srivastava, S., & Vishvakarma, B. R. (2003). Tunnel diode integrated rectangular
microstrip antenna for millimeter range. IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation
(USA), 51, 750.
57. Woo, C. F. (1964). Principles of tunnel diode circuits. New York: Wiley.
58. Sylvesten, G. P. (1962). Basic theory and applications of tunnel diode. Princeton, New
Jersey, USA: Van nostrand.
59. Soliman, F. A. S, & Kamh, S. A. (1993). Computer analysis for designing narrow band
tunnel diode amplifier circuit. Communication Faculty of Science University of Ankara
Series A2, A3, 42, 33–49.
60. Boric-Lubecke, O., Pan, D. S., & Itoh, T. (1995). Design and triggering of oscillators with a
series connection of tunneling diodes. Electronics and Engineering, 8(2), 271–286.
61. Brown, E. R., Soderstrom, J. R., Paker, C. D., Mahoney, L. J., Molvar, K. M., & McGill, T.
C. (1991). Oscillations up to 712 GHz in InAs/AISb resonant tunneling diodes. Applied
Physics Letters, 58(20), 20.
62. Menozzi, R., Piazzi, A., & Contini, F. (1996). Small-signal modeling for microwave FET
linear circuits based on a genetic algorithm. IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems—I:
Fundamental Theory and Applications, 43(10).
63. Jerinic, G., Fines, J., Cobb, M., & Schindler, M. (1985). Ka/Q band GaAs IMPATT
amplifier technology. International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 6(2), 79–
130.
64. Mishra, L. P., & Mitra, M. (2015). Design and characterization of Ka-Band reflection-type
IMPATT amplifier. Intelligent Computing, Communication and Devices Advanced
Intelligent Systems and Computing, 308, 487–492.
65. Al-Attar, T., & Lee, T. H. (2005). Monolithic integrated millimeter wave IMPATT
transmitter in standard CMOS technology. IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and
Techniques, 53(11).
66. Gupta, M. S., & Lomax, R. J. (1971). A self-consistent large-signal analysis of read-type
IMPATT diode oscillator. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, ED-18(8), 544–550.
1038 References
67. Gupta, M. S., & Lomax, R. J. (1971). Injection locking in IMPATT diode oscillators. In
Proceedings of the Third Biennial Cornell Electrical Engineering Conference (pp. 215–
223). Ithaca, New York: School of Electrical Engineering, Cornell University. Reprinted in:
Avalanche Transit-Time Devices, G.I. Haddad, editor, Artech House, Dedham, Mass. 1973,
pp. 457–460.
68. Gupta, M. S., & Lomax, R. J. (1973). A current-excited large-signal analysis of IMPATT
devices and its circuit implications. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, ED-20(4),
395–399.
69. Gupta, M. S. (1973). Computer-aided characterization of IMPATT diodes. In Proceedings
of the Fourth Biennial Cornell Electrical Engineering Conference (pp. 349–358). Ithaca,
New York: School of Electrical Engineering, Cornell University.
70. Gupta, M. S. (1973). A small-signal and noise equivalent circuit for IMPATT diodes. IEEE
Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, MTT-21(9), 591–594.
71. Gupta, M. S. (1973). Large-signal equivalent circuit for IMPATT diode characterization
and its application to amplifiers. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques,
MTT-21(11), 689–694.
72. Gupta, M. S. Lomax, R. J., & Haddad, G. I. (1974). Noise considerations in self-mixing
IMPATT-diode oscillators for short-range doppler radar applications. IEEE Transactions
on Microwave Theory and Techniques, MTT-22(1), 37–43.
73. Gupta, M. S. (1975). A simple approximate method of estimating the effect of carrier
diffusion in IMPATT diodes. Solid-State Electronics, 18(4), 327–330.
74. Gupta, M. S. (1976). A nonlinear equivalent circuit for IMPATT diodes. Solid-State
Electronics, 19(1), 23–26.
75. Atherton, D. P. (1981). Stability of nonlinear system (Electronic & Electrical engineering
research studies). New York: Wiley.
76. Xue, D., Chen, Y. Q., & Atherton, D. P. (2009). Linear feedback control: Analysis and
design with MATLAB (advanced in design and control). Society for industrial and applied
mathematics (1st ed.).
77. Atherton, D. P. (1982). Nonlinear control engineering. London: Chapman & Hall (stu sub
edition).
78. Bar-yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems (studies in nonlinearity) (1st ed.).
Boulder: Westview press.
79. Steeb, W. H. (2014). The nonlinear workbook: Chaos, fractals, cellular automata, generic
algorithms, gene expression programming, support vector machine, wavelets, hidden…
Java and symbolic C++ programs (6th ed.). Singapore: World scientific.
80. Sternberg, S. (2012). Curvature in mathematics and physics. New York: Dover
publications.
81. Sternberg, S. (2010). Dynamical systems. New York: Dover publications.
82. Scheinerman, E. R. (2012, January 18). Invitation to dynamical systems. New York: Dover
publications (Reprint edition).
83. Abraha, R. (1983). Dynamics the geometry of behavior part 2: Chaotic behavior (Visual
mathematics library). Aerial Press.
84. Abraham, R. (1982). Dynamics the geometry of behavior: Periodic behavior (Visual
mathematics library). Aerial Press.
85. Ahson, S., & Ilyas, M. (2008). RFID handbook, applications, technology, security, and
privacy. Boca Raton: CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group.
86. Aluf, O. (2014). Cylindrical RF network antennas for coupled plasma sources copper legs
delayed in time system stability. Transaction on networks and communications, 2(5),
116–146.
87. Cheban, D. N. (2015). Global attractors of non-autonomous dynamical and control systems
(2nd ed.). Singapore: World scientific.
88. Li, C., Wu, Y., & Ye, R. (2013). Recent advanced in applied nonlinear dynamics with
numerical analysis. Singapore: World scientific.
References 1039
118. Ivancevic, V. G., & Reid, D. J. (2014). Complexity and control. Singapore: World
Scientific.
119. Nicolis, G., & Nicolis, C. (2012). Foundations of complex systems. Singapore: World
Scientific.
120. Cencini, M., Cecconi, F., & Vulpiani, A. (2009). Chaos. Singapore: World Scientific.
121. Salleh, A., Abd aziz, M. Z. A., Misran, M. H., Othman, M. A., & Mohamad, N. R. (2013).
Design of wideband low noise amplifier using negative feedback topology for Motorola
application (Vol. 5, No. 1). ISSN: 2180-1843.
122. Duan, L., Huang, W., Ma, C., He, X., Jin, Y., & Ye, T. (2012). A single to differential low
noise amplifier with low differential output imbalance. Journal of Semiconductors, 33(3),
035002.
123. Kuang, Y., & Cushing, J. M. (1996). Global stability in a nonlinear difference delay
equation model of flour beetle population growth. Journal of Difference Equations and
Applications, 2, 31–37.
124. Elsayed, E. M., El-Dessoky, M. M., & Alotaibi, A. (2012). On the solutions of a general
system of difference equations, Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Discrete Dynamics in
Nature and Society, 2012(892571), 12.
125. Desoer, C. A. (1969). Basic circuit theory (1st ed.). New York: Mcgraw-Hill College.
126. Grover, F. W. (2004). Inductance calculations: Working formulas and tables. New York:
Dover publications.
127. Greenhouse, H. M. (1974). Design of planar rectangular microelectronic inductors. IEEE
Transactions on Parts, Hybrids, and Packaging, PHP-10(2).
128. Rodriguez, E. G. (2015). Reconfigurable transceiver architecture for multiband RF
frontends. Berlin: Springer.
129. Steinberg, K., Scheffler, M., & Dressel, M. (2010). Microwave inductance of thin metal
strips. Journal of Applied Physics, 108, 096102.
130. Liao, Y., Cai, K., Hubing, T. H., & Wang, X. (2014). Equivalent circuit of normal mode
helical antennas using frequency—Independent lumped elements. IEEE Transactions on
Antennas and Propagation, 62, 5885–5888.
131. Su, C., Ke, H., & Hubing, T. H. (2010). A simplified model for normal mode helical
antennas. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, 25(1), 32–40.
132. Su, C., Ke, H., & Hubing, T. H. (2010). Corrections to a simplified model for normal mode
helical antennas. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, 25(8), 722.
Index
Band attenuation, 673 70, 79, 85, 92, 96–98, 100, 114, 135–137,
Band Pass Filter (BPF), 674, 675, 683, 696, 139, 140, 141, 143, 148–153, 160, 161,
745, 752, 757, 761, 767, 911 163–165, 167, 171, 178, 181–183, 185,
Bandwidth, 3, 14, 338, 373, 573, 712, 785, 187, 188, 190, 195, 207–210, 212, 219,
903, 954, 957, 962 255–257, 259, 262, 263, 264, 266, 270,
Base current, 282, 584, 994, 996, 1002, 1003, 272, 273, 277, 356, 358, 360, 362, 365,
1007, 1008, 1018, 1019 366–370, 372, 389, 417, 430, 444, 454,
Base junction, 279, 280, 994, 1003, 1007, 457, 458, 459, 468, 478, 479, 483, 488,
1009, 1010 498, 536, 570, 572, 579, 614, 616, 624,
Base storage, 994 629, 638, 653, 683, 696, 704, 710, 711,
Base transport factor, 1003 736, 745, 761, 767, 797, 799, 800, 803,
Base width, 996, 1017, 1020, 1021, 1028 804, 806–808, 811–813, 816, 817, 820,
Battery, 1, 2, 44, 104 829, 830, 833–836, 870, 873, 881, 885,
Bias-T, 344, 355, 406, 471, 479, 484, 488 909, 910
BiCMOS, 1015 Charge carrier, 408, 489, 993, 994
Bi-cubic polynomial, 36, 164, 208 Charge control model, 1015, 1025, 1026, 1028
Bifurcation, 2, 14, 73, 101, 142, 164, 183, 208, Charge storage, 514, 1023, 1025, 1026
262, 372, 455, 480, 487, 811, 838, 905, 906 Charging capacitance, 1009
Binary Tree (BT), 3 Choke, 73, 156, 382, 493, 574, 631, 942, 943,
Bipolar transistor, 279–281, 299, 301, 910, 963
994, 995, 998, 1015, 1025, 1026, 1029 Circular coil, 784–786, 793–796
Birdcage coil, 196 Circular periodic, 12
Bit Error Rate (BER), 951 Circulator, 155, 171, 177, 178, 181, 191, 334,
BJT, 407, 408, 410, 423, 514, 517, 530, 559, 344, 355, 379, 910
574, 584–586, 619, 638, 645, 910, 993, Clap, 630, 910
1002, 1004, 1010, 1015, 1017, 1020, 1021 Class A, 514, 515, 574
Body effect parameter, 1012, 1013 Class AB, 514, 527
Boltzmann’s constant, 957 Class B, 513, 514, 559, 560
Bondwire, 71, 281, 854 Class C, 514, 528, 529, 536
Borderline, 22 Class D, 406
Branch, 173, 194, 305 Clipping, 952, 953, 1010
Breakdown, 156, 333, 747, 1006, 1008 Clockwise, 20
Breakdown voltage, 156, 747, 1007, 1008 Closed loop, 624, 629, 630
Bulk, 73, 515, 1012, 1013, 1015 CMOS, 103, 1015
Bulk-source, 1015 Coax cable, 461, 468
Burst switch, 104–106, 113, 116, 136, 142, 144 Co-dimension, 906
Bypass, 101, 222, 223, 225, 337, 618, 644 Coefficient, 36, 56, 59, 62, 66, 93, 98, 165,
Bypass capacitance, 101 208, 262, 362, 454, 456, 482, 612, 616,
804, 811, 830, 834, 1009
C Coil, 2, 8, 14, 24, 619, 620, 714, 784, 785, 793,
Capacitor, 2, 6, 155, 172, 197, 301, 335, 382, 795, 798, 808
460, 493, 574, 632, 697, 746, 842, 904, Collector current, 282, 528, 529, 993, 994, 996,
970, 980, 983, 1028, 1033 1007, 1015, 1022, 1027
Cascade, 711, 911 Collide, 905
CCNR, 336 Colpitts, 630, 910
Center, 19, 22, 422, 614, 617, 630, 643, 659, Common Base (CB), 405, 910, 941, 942, 1001
745, 853, 974 Common base forward short circuit current
Center manifold theorem, 617 gain, 282
Channel length modulation parameter, 1013 Common Collector (CC), 405, 910, 941, 944,
Chaos model, 1 945
Characteristic curve, 513 Common Emitter (CE), 405, 408, 910, 941,
Characteristic equation, 17, 23, 25, 28, 30–37, 943, 1001
39, 42, 45, 50, 53–57, 59, 60, 63–66, 68,
Index 1043
Complex, 19, 36, 67, 98, 103, 144, 167, 191, Decay oscillation spiral, 298
213, 262, 368, 456, 488, 527, 629, 696, Degenerate node, 22
710, 745, 797, 816, 834, 847, 884, 906, Delay, 2, 22, 24, 29, 33, 43, 45, 50, 55, 70,
909, 1021 101, 132, 157, 173, 196, 255, 360, 406,
Complex conjugate, 109, 366, 411, 615, 630, 461, 696, 793, 803, 817, 837, 906, 1026
696, 710, 745, 767, 872, 945 Delay dependent parameters, 2, 22, 46, 157,
Complex number, 19 696, 711, 819, 820, 872
Conductivity, 108, 785, 819, 839, 841, 918, Delay Differential Equation (DDE), 170
922, 1006 Delay parameter, 31, 57, 101, 142, 190, 229,
Conductor, 171, 279, 783, 784 372, 459, 479, 710, 838, 843, 907, 909
Conjugate, 833, 871, 884, 906, 959, 977 Depletion capacitance, 1009, 1010, 1015
Connectorize, 460 Derivative, 11, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25, 29, 38, 45,
Conservation, 619, 713, 714 68, 98, 115, 161, 165, 171, 180, 188, 204,
Continuous Wave (CW), 73 218, 230, 321, 348, 444, 483, 579, 653,
Converge, 18, 19, 21 794, 812, 819, 826, 835, 863, 907
Coordinates, 26, 52, 54, 82, 179, 180, 204, Detector, 1, 72, 74, 81, 94, 100–102, 489
252, 255, 324, 347, 349, 353, 794, 826, 828 Detector circuit, 101
Copper, 156, 196, 197, 202, 213, 335, 981 Determinant, 611, 613, 616, 726
Copper leg, 196, 213, 218, 910 Deterministic protocol, 3
Core, 619, 620, 713, 715 Deterministic TAG anti-collision, 4
Cos, 845 Device Under Test (DUT), 954
Cosmic noise, 957 Diagram, 14, 42, 102, 217, 574, 848
Counter, 20, 105, 410, 630 Diameter, 15, 23, 213, 784, 818, 873, 876, 914,
Counter clockwise, 20 925
Coupling coefficient, 46, 786, 820, 924 Dielectric constant, 980, 981
Cramer’s rule, 611, 726 Dielectric material, 222, 876
Critical threshold, 905 Differentiable, 29, 31, 35, 36, 43, 56, 59, 65,
Cross section, 73, 108, 785, 819, 841, 854, 97, 140, 186, 210, 365, 456, 482, 711, 804,
918, 919, 922, 931 817, 833, 872, 907
Crystal lattice, 674, 712 Differential equations, 2, 14, 16, 22, 45, 50, 77,
Current gain, 280, 405, 561, 943, 994, 1003, 113, 156, 177, 204, 285, 323, 443, 497,
1004, 1019, 1023, 1028 564, 607, 647, 679, 701, 721, 752, 760,
Current sink, 560, 1028 825, 879, 925
Current-voltage relation, 156, 994 Differential function, 456, 800
Curve, 336, 994, 1015, 1018, 1020, 1028 Diffusion, 156, 408, 993, 996, 1009
Curve bend, 981 Digital circuit, 72, 73, 513
Cutoff, 173, 339, 410, 1001 Diode, 72, 73, 101, 104, 155–157, 221, 230,
Cycle, 8, 19, 281, 515, 559, 953 334, 335, 347, 373, 410, 489, 490, 493,
Cylinder, 9 745, 749, 758, 765, 910, 995, 996, 1013,
Cylindrical RF network antennas, 156, 1014, 1026
202–204, 206, 210, 213, 217–219, 904 Diplexer, 673–675, 682, 689, 696, 704, 709,
711, 911
D Dipole antenna, 784, 873
dBm, 958, 964 Discrete system, 905
dB(s), 333, 410, 946, 964, 1009, 1017, 1018 Disjoint frequency band, 674
DC bias, 101, 156, 280, 335, 460, 574, 631, Displacement, 81, 203, 333
959, 1022 Dissipation balance, 8
DC resistance, 108, 785, 818, 819, 839, 841, Distortion, 408, 410, 513, 528, 559, 951–954,
918, 919, 922, 930, 931 1010
Decade bandwidth, 171, 172, 338 Distributed transformer, 979, 980
Decay, 10, 19, 617 Disturbance, 11, 528, 568
Decay exponentially, 19, 617 Disturbance grow, 10
Decaying oscillations, 19 Dopant, 1018, 1021, 1022
1044 Index
Double loop antennas, 44, 45, 48, 72 Etched, 8, 16, 904, 915
Drain, 172, 299, 301, 382, 574, 956, 1013, Euler’s formula, 162
1015, 1020 Excitable bifurcation system, 2
Drift region, 333, 334 Excitation, 45, 489
Dual band, 697, 704, 707, 710, 711 Exponential form, 25, 26, 28, 51, 81, 115, 161,
Duplexer, 674, 675 178, 204, 229, 252, 324, 347, 389, 430,
Dynamical behavior, 170, 905 468, 536, 624, 653, 704, 761, 794, 826,
Dynamic range, 408, 490, 712 869, 880
Exponential motion, 17
E External disturbance, 617
Ebers-Moll, 410, 514, 529, 995, 1003–1005,
1015, 1028 F
EFF, 945, 981 F20-FET-4 75, 171, 338, 190
Efficiency, 14, 333, 373, 513, 515, 529, 559, Faraday’s law, 620, 715
712, 945, 994, 1019 Far field, 783
Eigendirection, 19 Fast switch, 406, 489
Eigen solution, 17, 19 Feedback, 172, 280, 338, 382, 411, 573, 574,
Eigenvalue, 17–20, 56, 93, 164, 183, 229, 298, 579, 601, 602, 618, 630, 644, 944, 959, 962
347, 390, 422, 456, 498, 570, 579, 614, Feedback branch, 172, 338
617, 630, 659, 696, 710, 736, 745, 767, Feedback network, 602, 644
795, 797, 804, 826, 869, 871, 885, 906 Feedback resistor, 959
Eigenvector, 17, 18, 20 Feedback system, 617, 910
Electromagnetic, 1, 2, 42, 50, 222, 785, 818, Femtofarad, 305
911 Ferromagnetic material, 620, 715
Electromagnetic energy, 783 Fick’s law, 996
Electromagnetic interferences, 22, 24, 43–45, Field Effect Transistor (FET), 904
50, 72, 793 Film, 784, 849, 854, 855, 869, 872, 911,
Electron, 3, 279, 280, 299, 300, 333 1025
Electron injection, 1015, 1027 Filter, 105, 406, 529, 674, 675, 704, 709, 711,
Electrostatic, 1 712, 717, 733, 736, 738, 746, 911, 954
Emitter, 279, 280, 405, 408, 515, 528, 574, Five elements circuit, 874
584, 601, 631, 941, 944, 955, 993–995, Fixed point, 2, 10, 11, 13, 18–22, 25, 50, 51,
1001–1004, 1006–1008 81, 83, 115, 116, 161, 178, 179, 203, 229,
Emitter doping, 1002, 1019 286, 294, 309, 324, 329, 347, 354,
Empirical parameter, 221 429–431, 443, 467, 469, 498, 499, 525,
Encoder, 73 527, 535, 568, 579, 581, 611, 612, 624,
End of frame, 5 627, 636
Energy, 2–4, 6, 8, 19, 104, 113, 222, 223, 617, Flat topping, 952
619, 714, 911 Flux, 619, 620, 713, 714, 981
Energy consumption, 2–4, 6 Focus, 36, 70, 139, 164, 368, 488, 838, 994
Energy generation, 8 Forcing function, 9
Environment, 42, 72 Forcing signal, 169
EPC, 904 Forward active mode, 410, 995, 1002–1004,
Epitaxial layer, 299, 300 1010
Equilibrium, 25, 50, 70, 81, 115, 161, 178, Forward common emitter current gain, 282
203, 229, 291, 347, 388, 429, 444, 498, Free space, 783, 784, 874, 875
536, 614, 617, 624, 682, 735, 761, 816, Frequency, 1, 44, 104, 172, 221, 223, 280, 281,
828, 880, 993 301, 303, 305, 334, 335, 373, 405, 410,
Equivalent circuit, 2, 6, 7, 14, 15, 23, 73, 102, 490, 492, 528, 529, 601, 630, 631, 673,
164, 171, 299, 305, 383, 417, 461, 492, 674, 697, 745, 748, 874, 877, 904, 910,
498, 560, 579, 611, 712, 786, 852, 853, 941, 944, 950, 951, 954, 959, 962, 963,
874, 910, 1022 970, 974, 1021, 1024
Estimation, 8, 24, 915, 925 Frequency Division Duplex (FDD), 674
Index 1045
444, 468, 498, 536, 579, 624, 638, 652, Mixture, 841, 918, 919, 922
682, 696, 704, 711, 736, 761, 794, 820, Mobile, 818, 873, 904
826, 869, 872, 880, 905 MOD-FET, 299
Lower cut-off frequency, 461 Modulate, 73, 491, 951
Lower sideband ladde, 711 Monolithic, 155, 338, 910
Low pass response, 411, 673, 674, 947, 948 Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit
L–Shape, 411, 947 (MMIC), 155, 171, 338, 411, 904
MOSFET, 299, 304, 993, 1010–1015, 1020,
M 1025, 1028
Maclaurin series, 58, 61, 65, 135, 182, 185, Multilayer, 785, 786, 793–797, 800, 804, 811,
257, 366, 803, 807, 830, 833 812, 814, 816, 911
Magnetic circuit, 620, 715 Multiplication, 20, 243, 250, 953, 1007, 1008
Magnetic material, 620, 715 Multiplication coefficient, 1007
Majority carrier, 993, 1009, 1017 Multiplication factor, 1008
Manifold, 9, 167, 614, 617, 630, 643, 659, 904 Multi Slotted (MS) scheme, 3
Maps, 31, 33, 35, 38, 68, 99, 140, 188, 206, Multi Slotted with Assigned Slots (MAS), 3
208, 210, 264, 370, 457, 483, 813, 836, Multi Slotted with Selective sleep (MSS), 3
905, 908 Multistage, 373, 374, 573
Matching network, 73, 104, 105, 406, 411, Mutual inductance, 46, 786, 793, 820, 849,
417, 420–422, 430, 433, 435, 574, 575, 850, 852, 855–857, 874, 907, 923
675, 676, 697, 903, 904, 910, 947, 948, Mutual interaction, 169
950, 958, 959, 965, 970, 972 Mutually perpendicular, 19
Material composition, 1027
MATLAB, 22, 42, 46, 103, 157, 191, 213–215, N
217, 786, 820, 843, 845, 915, 925 N+ doped substrate, 156
Matrix, 11, 17, 77, 177, 346, 420, 452, 453, Narrow band, 422, 959, 973
499, 569, 570, 572, 613, 614, 617 N-Doped, 279, 299, 746, 993
Matrix formulation, 17 Negative Differential Resistance (NDR), 156,
Matrix system, 17 336, 1006
Maximum Available Gain (MAG), 961, 964 Negative resistance, 156, 221–224, 333–337,
Maximum oscillation frequency, 1025 355, 373, 380, 601, 618
Maximum Stable Gain (MSG), 964 Neural differential equation, 161
MESFETs, 171, 338 Noise current, 174, 957, 958
Metal structure, 222 Noise Factor (NF), 302
Meter, 784, 919, 922, 931, 940 Noise Figure (NF), 573, 958
Mho, 305 Noise voltage, 174, 957, 958
Microelectronic, 857 Noisy period, 105
Microphone, 957 Non-autonomous, 9
Microstrip, 155–157, 169, 171, 279, 335, 344, Nonlinear behavior, 410, 1003
374, 382, 383, 435, 461, 471, 786, 820, Nonlinear distortion, 952
849, 853, 857, 877, 907, 910, 911, 980–982 Nonlinear dynamic, 1, 299, 618
Microwave amplifier, 221, 222, 279 Nonlinearity, 675, 954, 956
Microwave bipolar transistor, 280 Nonlinear system, 15
Microwave cavity, 222, 223 Non-negative parameter, 12, 159
Microwave Integrated Circuit (MIC), 155, 910 Non-uniform, 1018, 1027
Microwave oscillator, 156, 221–223, 228, 333, Normally ON, 299
601, 910 Normal Mode Helical Antenna (NMHA), 873,
Millimeter, 280, 299, 302, 304, 783 876
Minor, 300, 471 NPN, 515, 517, 530, 559, 586, 618, 619, 632,
Mismatched line, 950 644, 645, 993–995, 1001, 1002, 1007, 1015
Mismatch load, 950 N–Region, 333, 334, 337, 489, 490, 746
Mismatch Loss (ML), 946, 964, 981 N-Turn multilayer, 784–786, 792–795, 797,
Miter bend, 981 800, 802, 806, 811–813, 816
1048 Index
Number index, 202, 218 263, 267, 370, 372, 457, 459, 482, 488,
Numerator, 242, 541, 611, 975 568, 715, 813, 816, 836, 908, 910
Numerically, 36, 66, 71, 97, 115, 138, 164, Passive, 1–3, 12, 44–46, 105, 155, 406, 674,
186, 187, 194, 208, 212, 262, 291, 367, 676, 911, 948, 951
456, 479, 482, 524, 614, 696, 745, 797, Passive tag, 1, 2
811, 834, 847, 884, 906 PCB, 950, 962, 981, 982
PCB stray, 854
O PDEs, 905
ODEs, 905 P-Doped, 279, 993
Ohmic region, 221 Perfect Electric Conductor (PEC), 873
Ointment, 839, 913, 914, 923 Perfect match, 109, 959, 965, 966, 984
One frame, 5 Periodic, 12, 13, 20, 159, 601
Open circuit stable, 336 Periodic forcing, 9
Operational frequency, 335, 1009 Periodic function, 9
Operator, 165, 169 Periodic orbit, 9, 905
Optical spectrum, 903 Periodic solution, 9
Optimal bandwidth, 373 Periodic transformation, 13, 159
Optimization, 2, 14, 22, 44, 73, 299, 305, 784, Permeability, 223, 784, 839, 849, 874, 913,
785, 818, 849, 910, 911 923
Orbit, 2, 9, 12, 14, 19, 73, 617, 630, 905 Permittivity, 223
Orientation, 12, 44 Perturbation, 12, 614, 616
Origin, 18–20, 613 Phase plan, 12, 18
Oscilloscope, 221 Phase portrait, 19, 527, 568
Overlapping, 1013, 1014 Phase response, 408
Oxide thickness, 1015 Phase shift, 171, 410, 602, 611, 617, 618, 910,
Oxide trench, 1028 944, 977
Phase shift network, 602, 603
P Phase shift resonator, 617
P+ top, 156 PHEMT SSM, 305
Pad reactance, 950 Photo detector, 406
Parameter, 2, 12–14, 16, 20, 25, 31, 37, 42, 46, Physical proximity, 620, 715
47, 55, 57, 60, 64, 66, 68, 69, 71–73, 81, Pi–matching network, 406, 422, 947, 949
92, 96, 98, 99, 101, 103, 116, 131, 133, PIN diode, 155, 406, 489, 492, 494, 498, 500,
137, 139, 141, 143, 163, 168, 171, 176, 904
181, 184, 187, 191, 194, 195, 206, 217, Pitch, 873, 874
219, 256, 264, 300, 319, 366, 370, 373, Planar PCB, 46, 820, 923
454, 457, 459, 475, 479, 481, 483, 488, Plasma, 155, 196, 910
574, 659, 683, 705, 733, 738, 785, 795, P-N junction, 156, 172, 221, 338, 910, 994,
809, 811, 812, 814, 818, 832–834, 852 995
Parameter function, 2, 14, 15, 22, 23, 36, 38, PNP, 515, 517, 586, 993, 994, 998, 999, 1001,
39, 46, 51, 70, 73, 86, 96, 138, 163, 169, 1007, 1009, 1015
188, 194, 203, 211, 219, 229, 261, 267, Polar coordinates, 13
302, 348, 454, 459, 478, 517, 784, 804, PolyEthylene Terephthalate (PET), 904
819, 834, 873, 908, 978, 1015, 1028 Polynomial, 25, 51, 57, 60, 66, 81, 94, 96, 97,
Parasitic delay, 73, 77, 194, 197, 218, 435, 115, 137, 138, 161, 167, 178, 183, 186,
784 203, 229, 263, 324, 347, 362, 364, 368,
Parasitic effect, 104, 105, 113, 155, 156, 171, 389, 417, 430, 444, 455, 468, 480, 482,
181, 194, 202, 218, 279, 406, 435, 471, 498, 536, 579, 616, 624, 638, 683, 704,
676, 697, 785, 786, 818, 853, 877, 907, 736, 794, 801, 810, 826, 834, 880
911, 950 Poly-Si base, 1028
Parasitic inductance, 73, 101, 490 Positive feedback, 405, 601–603, 618, 944
Partial derivative, 36, 38, 67, 68, 70, 99, 139, Positive root, 36, 37, 68, 94, 97, 99, 136, 139,
142, 144, 164, 169, 187, 188, 190, 210, 140, 164, 167, 183, 187, 188, 209, 260,
Index 1049
263, 264, 362, 368, 369, 455, 457, 483, Receiver, 72, 73, 101, 105, 155, 156, 173, 174,
813, 908 494, 573, 673, 674, 712, 783, 903, 904,
Power circuit, 105, 559, 1020 942, 943, 951, 954, 956, 958
Power gain, 405, 410, 574, 903, 944, 964 Recombination, 490, 491, 994, 1003, 1017,
Power limiter, 155, 156, 158–161, 163, 164, 1025
169, 171 Rectangular spiral antenna, 104, 105, 109, 784,
Pre-collection mode, 333 818–820, 824–827, 829, 833, 834,
Printed, 8, 16, 72, 904, 915, 925 836–838, 843, 911, 914, 923, 924
Printed coil, 8, 16 Rectifier, 489
Projection, 9, 167 Reference direction, 620, 714
Propagation, 980, 981 Reflection, 109, 155, 171, 334–336, 339, 377,
PRrx, 6 406, 411, 903, 910, 941, 945, 947, 965, 981
PRtx, 6 Reflection Type Phase Shifter (RTPS), 171,
PTrx, 6 194
PTtx, 6 Re/Im, 615, 630, 696, 710, 745, 767, 797, 884,
Pulse based half duplex, 4 906
Pulse Width Modulation (PWM), 513 Relative permeability, 213
Pure imaginary, 20, 43, 44, 195, 219, 299, 365, Relaxation oscillator, 601
817 Resistance noise, 957
Purely resistive, 461, 973, 976 Resistive component, 461
Push pull amplifier, 514, 527 Resistivity, 489, 490, 854
Resistor, 2, 6, 14, 18, 46, 155, 169, 172, 174,
Q 221, 301, 338, 382, 383, 489, 491, 493,
Q–Point, 411 494, 515, 528, 574, 602, 603, 618, 631,
QT protocol, 4 644, 676, 697, 745, 786, 811, 820, 877,
Quadratic solution, 18 904, 923, 959, 963, 964, 974, 1023
Quadratic term, 11, 568, 569 Resonance frequency, 14, 631, 874
Quarter wavelength long, 335 Resonant, 155, 196, 222, 223, 333, 334, 528,
Quarter wave line transformer, 979 529, 603, 631, 673, 674, 711, 712, 874,
Quartz crystal, 631, 673, 674, 712 903, 948, 970
Query, 3 Response mechanism, 4
Query Tree (QT), 4 Resultant output signal, 951
Reverse active mode, 995, 1005
R Reverse bias, 279, 280, 301, 333, 493, 494,
Radar, 73, 333–335, 674, 904 746, 747, 995, 1002, 1004, 1005, 1010,
Radial wave number, 875 1013, 1015, 1017, 1026
Radio frequency identification, 1 Reverse biased varactor, 674
Radius, 108, 784, 785, 819, 839, 873, 918, Reverse biasing, 280, 489, 493, 1008
919, 922, 930, 931 Reverse common emitter current gain, 282
Random Access Memory (RAM), 1 Reverse mode, 995
Randomly, 3, 956 Reverse saturation, 996, 1013
Reactance, 101, 280, 337, 339, 461, 490, 631, Reversing, 12
746, 874, 959, 970, 972, 974, 978, 980 RFC, 631, 942, 943, 963
Reader energy consumption, 6 RFID, 1–4, 6, 8, 9, 11–28, 31, 33, 35–38, 40,
Reader query, 4, 5 42, 44, 46, 48, 51, 52, 55, 57, 61, 65, 67,
Reader transmits energy, 4 68, 70–73, 78, 81, 85, 97, 98, 100, 101,
Real number, 30, 32, 34, 56, 59, 63, 94, 137, 104, 105, 108, 109, 113, 115, 117,
183, 206, 207, 213, 260, 298, 363, 455, 134–136, 138–140, 143, 144, 783–786,
480, 696, 710, 801, 804, 808, 831, 843, 792, 794–797, 812, 818–820, 824–827,
871, 872, 904 829, 833, 836–839, 841–843, 845, 848,
Receive mode, 4 873, 876, 904, 905, 911
1050 Index
RFin signal, 77, 177, 286, 290, 293, 301 Sleep commands, 3, 6
Room temperature, 282, 492, 996, 1023 Small displacement, 25, 51, 116, 162, 178,
Root, 30, 32, 34, 36, 37, 40, 42–44, 56, 59, 60, 324, 348, 795, 826
63, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 94, 96–99, 101, 103, Small disturbance, 10, 527, 568
136–138, 142, 144, 160–165, 171, 183, Small increment, 25, 26, 51, 52, 54, 82, 115,
184, 186, 187, 190, 191, 195, 206, 208, 117, 128, 161, 178–180, 203, 204, 229,
209, 212, 218, 260, 262, 263, 267, 362, 230, 254, 255, 324, 330, 347–349, 352,
365, 367–369, 372, 373, 455–457, 459, 353, 355, 389, 417, 420, 430, 432, 433,
480–483, 488, 490, 614, 629, 696, 697, 444, 459, 468, 476, 498, 536, 579, 624,
710, 745, 767, 797, 801, 804, 805, 808, 627–629, 638, 641, 642, 652, 653, 657,
810–812, 816, 817, 831, 832, 834, 838, 682, 683, 686, 704, 707, 736, 743, 745,
848, 872, 884, 906, 907, 957, 961 761, 765, 767, 794, 798, 826–828, 869,
Rotation, 20, 155, 171 870, 880, 883
Round strip, 197 Small signal amplifier, 407, 411
Routh-Hurwitz, 333, 422, 434, 501, 558, 584, 616 Small Signal Model (SSM), 338
Solar flare, 957
S Source, 980, 983, 1012, 1015, 1019
S/m, 785, 841, 919 Source contact resistance, 1013
S2P, 960 Space charge layer, 334
Saddle point, 298, 572 S–Parameters, 960, 965
Saturation current, 221, 1003 Spectrum, 222, 673, 957
Scalar, 161, 964 Speed, 51, 81, 179, 348, 499, 903, 1015, 1021,
Schottky diode, 73, 102 1024
Schottky junction, 338 Spice Gummel Poon (SGP) model, 559
Segment, 43, 72, 195, 219, 222, 855, 873, 876 Spiral, 14, 19, 22, 298, 818–820, 825–828,
Selective sleep scheme, 3 830, 833, 834, 839, 842, 844, 845, 848
Self-bias method, 300 Spiral antenna, 818, 819, 825, 827, 834, 916,
Semi-passive RFID, 44–46 923
Separation distance, 45 Spiral converge, 18
Sequential (SEQ) operational, 4 S–Port, 674
Shichman, 1010 Spurious, 493, 954
Shifted gate, 44, 45, 50–52, 54, 57, 65 Spurs, 962
Short analysis, 194, 218 Squaring, 167, 188, 264, 457
Shunt, 101, 156, 157, 574, 963, 977, 978 SSB, 674
Shunt PCB, 854 Stability, 2, 21–23, 28, 35, 38–40, 42, 44, 55,
Siemens, 840, 919, 931 70–73, 86, 99, 101, 102, 104, 115, 140,
SiGe, 1015, 1017, 1020 143, 144, 155, 157, 160, 163, 167, 170,
Sign, 812, 816, 835, 838, 907, 910 181, 190–192, 194, 205, 208, 212, 217,
Signal, 461, 489, 491, 493, 513, 515, 529, 559, 219, 223, 256, 259, 267, 279, 298, 319,
574, 602, 631, 674, 904, 941, 944, 951, 333, 356, 358, 360, 366, 372, 373, 383,
952, 958, 981, 1003, 1010, 1019, 1024 392, 406, 411, 422, 434, 435, 453, 457,
Signal feeding, 197 459, 476, 478, 487, 488, 493, 501, 514,
Signal source, 334, 1023 558, 573, 574, 584, 601, 603, 614, 619,
Silicon, 73, 299, 489, 490, 1020 632, 643, 645, 659, 660, 686, 696, 697,
Silver, 839, 841, 913, 918, 919, 931 710, 745, 784, 786, 799, 813, 816, 818,
Simulation, 820, 1013, 1018, 1026, 1029 820, 829, 838, 848, 857, 872, 903,
Simulation model, 514, 1026 905–907, 910, 911
Sin, 167 Stability analysis, 28, 35, 43, 55, 65, 72, 155,
Sine wave, 528, 956 181, 195, 205, 219, 256, 333, 405, 411,
Single Pole Single Throw (SPST, 493 435, 454, 459, 489, 559, 601, 611, 630,
Siphon, 1009 644, 673, 674, 696, 697, 711, 783, 799,
SI unit, 840, 841, 918, 922 829, 872, 906, 910
Skin depth, 490 Stability switch, 22, 42, 44, 46, 68, 71, 102,
Skin effect, 490 103, 157, 188, 191, 194, 195, 210, 212,
Index 1051
217, 220, 264, 360, 370, 372, 373, 483, Track, 818, 840, 913, 915, 918, 922, 940
488, 816, 817, 820, 848, 908 Track thickness, 8, 915, 925
Stable focus, 812, 910 Trajectory, 19, 527
Stable node, 19, 298, 572 Trans conductance, 1015
Stable spiral, 298, 573 Transducer unilateral gain (Gth), 964
Stable steady state, 630, 710, 797, 884 Transformation, 712, 722, 975
Standing Wave Ratio (SWR), 950 Transformer, 174, 515, 528, 712, 904, 977
Star, 422, 957 Transformer’s coil, 620, 714
Star node, 20, 22 Transistor, 629–631, 644, 910, 952, 953, 956,
Start of frame, 5 959, 994, 995, 1002, 1003, 1006, 1008,
Static avalanche region, 1007 1012, 1018, 1026, 1029
Stored energy, 461 Transition, 163, 190, 459, 909
Straight, 17, 849, 851, 854, 855, 857, 862, 869, Transit-time, 333
871, 872, 963, 1018 Transmission line, 155, 281, 339, 574, 950,
Straight line solution, 17 958, 980, 981
Stray capacitance, 972, 973 Trigger circuit, 221
Strip, 854 Trivial solution, 160
S-Type, 336 Tunable, 674, 746, 761
Subscript, 68, 165, 210, 457, 836, 1017 Tunable BPF, 745, 748, 761
Subspace, 617 Tunnel Diode (TD), 221–223, 228, 910
Substantial current, 1006 Tunneling, 221, 223
Suck, 1002 Turn, 489, 491, 619, 713, 847, 849, 857, 870,
Sunspot, 957 872, 876, 1008
Surface inversion potential, 1012 Turn ratio, 174
Surface mount, 460
Symmetric, 172, 923 U
UH, 915
T UHF television tuner, 221
TAG ID, 2–4, 6 Unforced oscillator, 9
Taylor expansion, 207, 212 Unforced system, 13
Taylor series expansion, 58, 61, 65, 182, 185, Uniformly asymptotically stable, 160
366, 807 Uniformly bounded, 160, 161
Terahertz, 903 Unperturbed system, 12
Terminology, 35, 65, 96, 138, 164, 185, 262, Unstable, 161, 179, 190, 203, 222, 229, 325,
338, 422, 481, 674, 975 411, 459, 498, 614, 616, 696, 710, 795,
Tetrode, 221 826, 906
Thermal voltage, 282, 561 Unstable multi-vibrator, 601
Thickness, 106, 156, 300, 490, 849, 854, 981, Unstable node, 19
1021 Unstable spiral, 22
Thin plate, 48, 825 Unstable steady state, 630, 696, 745, 906
Third Order Intercept Point (TOI), 408 Upper cut-off frequency, 461
Third time interval, 169 UV, 903
Three dimensional autonomous systems, 9
Three elements circuit, 874 V
Threshold, 46, 156, 820, 1012 Valley, 224, 950
Time delay, 29, 38, 43, 46, 72, 157, 194, 195, Valley voltage, 950
219, 222, 360, 410, 488, 825, 907 Van der Pol’s system, 8
Time slot, 4 Varactor, 173, 338, 746, 761, 911
T–Matching network, 383, 406, 411, 422, 676, Variable, 177, 194, 218, 282, 344, 389, 430,
948 444, 489, 498, 536, 579, 624, 653, 745,
T–Network, 976 840, 919
Topologically, 9 Variable parameters, 45, 73
Trace, 46, 923, 950 Variation argument, 208, 367, 804, 811
1052 Index