Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
, 14(2), 2012; nᵒ 10, 57‐66 ISSN 0976 – 044X
Review Article
POLYMERS IN PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM: A REVIEW
Krushnakumar J Gandhi*, Subhash V Deshmane, Kailash R Biyani
Department of Pharmaceutics, Anuradha College of Pharmacy, Chikhli, Dist‐ Buldana 443201, India.
*Corresponding author’s E‐mail: kjg16@rediffmail.com
Accepted on: 10‐04‐2012; Finalized on: 25‐05‐2012.
ABSTRACT
The current review article focuses on polymers in pharmaceutical drug delivery of therapeutic agents. These dosage forms include
tablets, patches, tapes, films, semisolids and powders. Polymers are the backbone of a pharmaceutical drug delivery system as they
control the release of the drug from the device. Biodegradable polymers attracts the attention of its use as they can be degraded to
non‐toxic monomers and most important, a constant rate of drug release can be achieved from a biodegradable polymer based
controlled release device. Natural polymers can be used as the means of achieving predetermined rates of drug delivery and their
physico‐chemical characteristics with the ease of availability provide a platform to use it as a polymer for drug delivery systems.
Biodegradable polymers have been widely used in biomedical applications because of their known biocompatibility and
biodegradability. In the biomedical area, polymers are generally used as implants and are expected to perform long term service.
These improvements contribute to make medical treatment more efficient and to minimize side effects and other types of
inconveniences for patients. The main role of polymer is to protect drug from physiological environment and prolong release of drug
to improve its stability. The drug is release from polymer by diffusion, degradation and swelling. In addition to this review presents
characteristics and behaviours of plant derived and mucoadhesive polymers which are currently used in drug delivery.
Keywords: Polymers, excipients, synthetic polymer, natural polymer, sustained release, control release, mucoadhesion.
copolymers and other groups yields a wealth of materials polymers at an industrial scale and the quick and total
with a wide spectrum of possible application. The solubilization of the pharmaceuticals for safe inoculation.
resulting materials are capable of a variety of drug‐ The optimization of these clinical tests (in terms of dosage
enhancing functions.8 and frequency) is still being evaluated today for a large
variety of products.11
Polymers are able to:
• Prolong drug availability if medicines are formulated as
hydrogels9 or microparticles.10
• Favourably alter bio distribution, if formulated into
dense nanoparticles.
• Enable hydrophobic drug administration if formulated
as micelles.
• Transport a drug to its usually inaccessible site of action
if formulated as gene medicines.
Figure 1: The families of polymer constructs called
• Make drugs available in response to stimuli. polymer therapeutics.
HISTORY ROLE OF POLYMER IN PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG
DELIVERY8
The use of polymers in the medical field is not a novelty ‐
natural polymers have been used as components of Immediate release dosage forms
herbal remedies for centuries. When it comes to synthetic
Tablets
polymers however the situation is very different. Because
polymer science is a relatively recent area of research Polymers have been used for many years as excipients in
synthetic water‐soluble polymers as macromolecular conventional immediate‐release oral dosage forms, either
drugs or as part of drug delivery systems related to to aid in the manufacturing process or to protect the drug
inoculation can be considered a modern achievement. from degradation upon storage. Microcrystalline cellulose
The first polymer‐drug conjugates appeared around 1955, is often used as an alternative to carbohydrates as
being mescaline‐N‐vinylpyrolidine conjugate one of the diluents in tablet formulations of highly potent low‐dose
first. drugs. Starch and cellulose are used as disintegrants in
tablet formulations, which swell on contact with water,
About ten years later Frank Davis and Abraham
resulting in the tablet “bursting,” increasing the exposed
Abuchowski were able to foresee the potential of
surface area of the drug and improving the dissolution
conjugating poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) to proteins
characteristics of a formulation. Polymers including
causing the birth of a technique called PEGylation.
polyvinyl‐pyrrolidone and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
PEGylation consists in the covalent bond of poly(ethylene
(HPMC) also find uses as binders that aid the formation of
glycol) polymer chains to another molecule usually a drug
granules that improve the flow and compaction
or a protein with therapeutic effects.
properties of tablet formulations prior to tableting.
In 1994, the first synthetic polymer‐drug conjugate (as Occasionally, dosage forms must be coated with a “non‐
shown in figure 1b) designed to treat cancer was clinically functional” polymeric film coating in order to protect a
tested. It consisted on an HPMA (N‐(2‐hydroxypropyl) drug from degradation, mask the taste of an unpalatable
methacrylamide) copolymer conjugate of doxorubicin. drug or excipients, or improve the visual elegance of the
Targeted release of anticancer agents can also be made formulation without affecting the drug release rate. 12
using block copolymer micelles which have the ability to
Capsules
entrap the drug or to covalently link to it.
Capsules are used as an alternative to tablets, for poorly
In the 2000s, two polymer‐protein conjugates,(as shown
compressible materials, to mask the bitter taste of certain
in figure 1a) PEG‐interferon‐α (an antiviral drug intended
drugs, or sometimes to increase bioavailability. Many of
to treat chronic hepatitis C and hepatitis B) and PEG‐GCSF
the polymeric excipients used to “bulk out” capsule fills
(PEG granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor) were placed
are the same as those used in immediate‐release tablets.
in the market and five years later the first therapeutic
Gelatine has been used almost exclusively as a shell
nanoparticles (albumin‐entrapped paclitaxel) was
material for hard (two‐piece) and soft (one‐piece)
approved as a treatment for metastatic breast cancer. All
capsules. HPMC has recently been developed and
the above achievements and researches were the core
accepted as an alternative material for the manufacture
element that led to the development of polymer based
of hard (two‐piece) capsules.
pharmaceuticals namely polymeric drugs, polymer‐drug
conjugates and polymer‐protein conjugates. The clinical Modified‐release dosage forms
trials of these new technologies eventually lead to the
It is now generally accepted that for many therapeutic
resolution of many other unexpected challenges that
agents drug delivery using immediate release dosage
quickly appeared, such as the manufacturing of the
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research Page 58
Available online at www.globalresearchonline.net
Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 14(2), 2012; nᵒ 10, 57‐66 ISSN 0976 – 044X
Polymers Used for the Delivery of Genes in Gene Water‐Insoluble Biodegradable Polymers
Therapy (Lactide‐co‐glycolide) polymers Microparticle–
A number of polymers by virtue of possessing a cationic nanoparticle for protein delivery.
charge at physiological pH have been found to be suitable Starch‐Based Polymers
candidates for the transfer of genes across the various
biological barriers outlined in the preceding text. An ideal Starch Glidant, a diluent in tablets and capsules,
gene delivery system has to be able to shuttle the gene a disintegrant in tablets and capsules, a tablet
safely to the nuclei of its target tissue with the travelling binder.
gene having limited encounters with degradative
Sodium starch glycolate super disintegrant for
influences.
tablets and capsules in oral delivery.
POLYMERS IN PHARMACEUTICAL APPLICATIONS22‐24
Plastics and Rubbers
Water‐Soluble Synthetic Polymers
Polyurethane Transdermal patch backing, blood
Poly (acrylic acid) Cosmetic, pharmaceuticals, pump, artificial heart, and vascular grafts, foam
immobilization of cationic drugs, base for Carbopol in biomedical and industrial products.
polymers.
Polyisobutylene Pressure sensitive adhesives for
Poly (ethylene oxide) Coagulant, flocculent, very high transdermal delivery.
molecular‐weight up to a few millions, swelling
Polycyanoacrylate Biodegradable tissue
agent.
adhesives in surgery, a drug carrier in nano‐ and
Poly (ethylene glycol) Mw <10,000; liquid (Mw microparticles.
<1000) and wax (Mw >1000), plasticizer, base for
Poly (vinyl acetate) Binder for chewing gum.
suppositories.
Poly (vinyl chloride) Blood bag, and tubing.
Poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) Used to make betadine
(iodine complex of PVP) with less toxicity than iodine, Polyethylene Transdermal patch backing for drug
plasma replacement, tablet granulation. in adhesive design, wrap, packaging, containers.
Poly (vinyl alcohol) Water‐soluble packaging, tablet Poly (methyl methacrylate) Hard contact lenses.
binder, tablet coating.
Poly (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) Soft contact
lenses.
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research Page 60
Available online at www.globalresearchonline.net
Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 14(2), 2012; nᵒ 10, 57‐66 ISSN 0976 – 044X
CLASSIFICATION POLYMERS Diffusion
Basis on interaction with water Diffusion occurs when a drug or other active agent passes
through the polymer that forms the controlled‐release
Non‐biodegradable hydrophobic Polymers:‐ E.g.
device. Diffusion occurs when the drug passes from the
Polyvinyl chloride,
polymer matrix into the external environment. As the
Soluble Polymers:‐ E.g. HPMC, PEG release continues its rate normally decreases with this
type of system since the active agent has a progressively
Hydro gels:‐ E.g. Polyvinyl pyrrolidine
longer distance to travel and therefore requires a longer
Based on polymerisation method diffusion time to release. In these systems, the
combinations of polymer matrices and bioactive agents
Addition Polymers:‐ E.g. Alkane Polymers
chosen must allow for the drug to diffuse through the
Condensation polymers:‐ E.g. Polysterene and pores or macromolecular structure of the polymer upon
Polyamide introduction of the delivery system into the biological
environment without inducing any change in the polymer
Based on polymerization mechanism
itself.25
Chain Polymerization
Degradation
Step growth Polymerization
Biodegradable polymer degrades within the body as a
Based on chemical structure result of natural biological processes, eliminating the
need to remove a drug delivery system after release of
Activated C‐C Polymer
the active agent has been completed. Most
Inorganic polymers biodegradable polymers are designed to degrade as a
Natural polymers result of hydrolysis of the polymer chains into biologically
acceptable and progressively smaller compounds.26 For
Based on occurrence some degradable polymers, most notably the
Natural polymers:‐ E.g. 1. Proteins‐collagen, polyanhydrides and polyorthoesters, the degradation
keratin, albumin, cellulose occurs only at the surface of the polymer, resulting in a
release rate that is proportional to the surface area of the
Synthetic polymers:‐ E.g. Polyesters, polyamides drug delivery system
Based on bio‐stability Swelling
Bio‐degradable They are initially dry and when placed in the body will
Non Bio‐degradable absorb water or other body fluids and swell. The swelling
increases the aqueous solvent content within the
Characteristics of an ideal polymer formulation as well as the polymer mesh size, enabling
It should be versatile and possess a wide range the drug to diffuse through the swollen network into the
of mechanical, physical, chemical properties. external environment. 27
It should be non‐toxic and have good mechanical POLYMERS IN PHARMACEUTICAL DRUG DELIVERY
strength and should be easily administered. SYSTEM
It should be inexpensive and easy to fabricate. Rosin
It should be inert to host tissue and compatible Rosin a film‐forming biopolymer and its derivatives have
with environment. been extensively evaluated pharmaceutically as film‐
coating and microencapsulating materials to achieve
Criteria followed in polymer selection sustained drug release. They are also used in cosmetics,
The polymer should be soluble and easy to chewing gums, and dental varnishes. Rosin has been used
synthesis. to prepared spherical microcapsules by a method based
on phase separation by solvent evaporation. Rosin
It should have finite molecular weight. combination with polyvinyl pyrrolidone and dibutyl
It should be compatible with biological phthalate (30 % w/w) produces smooth film with
environment. improved elongation and tensile strength.28‐30
It should be biodegradable. Chitin and Chitosan
the mucoadhesive properties of different polymers with Attraction and repulsion forces arise and, for a
varying molecular architecture.51 mucoadhesive to be successful, the attraction forces must
dominate. The mechanism of mucoadhesion is generally
The use of a mucoadhesive polymer that attach to related
divided in two steps, the contact stage and the
tissue or to the surface coating of the tissue for the
consolidation stage (shown in figure 8)
targeting various absorptive mucosa such as ocular, nasal,
pulmonary, buccal, vaginal etc. This system of drug
delivery is called as mucoadhesive drug delivery system.
The various mucoadhesive polymers used for the
development of buccal delivery systems include
cyanoacrylates, polyacrylic acid, sodium
carboxymethylcellulose, hyaluronic acid,
hydroxypropylcellulose, polycarbophil, chitosan and
gellan.52, 53
Lectins Figure 8: The two steps of the mucoadhesion process
Lectins are proteins which have the ability to reversibly FUTURE TRENDS
bind with specific sugar / carbohydrate residues and are
Despite the excessive use of synthetic polymers the need
found in both animal and plant kingdom in addition to
for natural biodegradable polymers to deliver drugs
various microorganisms.54‐56 Lectins extracted from
continues to be area of active research. Natural polymer
legumes have been widely explored for targeted delivery
has numerous advantages over synthetic ones as being
systems. The various lectins which have shown specific
readily available relatively inexpensive, natural products
binding to the mucosa include lectins extracted from Ulex
of living organisms, possibilities of chemical
europaeus I, soybean, peanut and Lens culinarius.57 The
modifications. The most exciting opportunities in polymer
use of wheat germ agglutinin has been on the rise due to
drug delivery lie in the arena of responsive delivery
its least immunogenic reactions, amongst available
systems, with which it will be possible to deliver in
lectins, in addition to its capability to bind to the
response to a measured blood level or to deliver a drug
intestinal and alveolar epithelium and hence could be
precisely to a targeted site. Much of the development of
used to design oral and aerosol delivery systems.58
novel materials in controlled drug delivery is focusing on
Thiolated polymers the preparation and use of these responsive polymers
with specifically designed macroscopic and microscopic
These are the special class of multifunctional polymers
structural and chemical features.
called thiomers which are modified existing polymers by
the addition of thiol group. These are hydrophilic Such systems include:
macromolecules exhibiting free thiol groups on the
Copolymers with desirable
polymeric backbone. Thiomers are capable of forming
hydrophilic/hydrophobic interactions.
intra‐ and interchain disulphide bonds within the
polymeric network leading to strongly improved cohesive Complexation networks responding via hydrogen
properties and stability of drug delivery systems such as or ionic bonding.
matrix tablets. Due to the formation of strong covalent
Polymers as nanoparticles for immobilization of
bonds with mucus glycoproteins, thiomers show the
enzymes, drugs, peptides, or other biological
strongest mucoadhesive properties of all so far tested
agents.
polymeric excipients via thioldisulphide exchange
reaction and an oxidation process. Various thiolated New biodegradable polymers.
polymers include chitosan–iminothiolane, poly(acrylic
acid)–cysteine, poly(acrylic acid)–homocysteine, New blends of hydrocolloids and carbohydrate‐
chitosan–thioglycolic acid, chitosan–thioethylamidine, based polymers.
alginate–cysteine, poly(methacrylic acid)–cysteine and Design and synthesis of novel combinations of polymers
sodium carboxymethylcellulose–cysteine.59 will expand the scope of new drug delivery systems in the
Poloxomer future. This will obviously require assimilation of a great
deal of emerging information about the chemical nature
Poloxomer gels have been investigated as they are and physical structure of these new materials. There is an
reported to show phase transitions from liquids to increasing movement of scientists and engineers who are
mucoadhesive gels at body temperature and will dedicated to minimizing the environmental impact of
therefore allow in‐situ gelation at the site of interest. polymer composite production. Life cycle assessment is of
MECHANISMS OF MUCOADHESION60 paramount importance at every stage of a product's life,
from initial synthesis through to final disposal and a
The mucoadhesive must spread over the substrate to sustainable society needs environmentally safe materials
initiate close contact and increase surface contact, and processing methods.61, 62
promoting the diffusion of its chains within the mucus.
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research Page 64
Available online at www.globalresearchonline.net
Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 14(2), 2012; nᵒ 10, 57‐66 ISSN 0976 – 044X
CONCLUSION 13. Park, K. and Robinson, J.R., Bioadhesive polymers as
platforms for oral‐controlled drug delivery: method to
Polymer‐based pharmaceuticals are starting to be seen as study bioadhesion, Int. J. Pharm., 19, 1984, 107.
key elements to treat many lethal diseases that affect a
14. Chang, H.S., Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral
great number of individuals such as cancer or hepatitis.
controlled drug delivery II: synthesis and evaluation of
Although excipients have traditionally been included in
some swelling, water‐insoluble bioadhesive polymers, J.
formulations as inert substances to mainly make up Pharm. Sci., 74(4), 1985, 399.
volume and assist in the manufacturing process, they are
increasingly included in dosage forms to fulfil specialized 15. Harris, D., Fell, J.T., Sharma, H.L., and Taylor, D.C.,
Gastrointestinal transit of potential bioadhesive
functions for improved drug delivery because many new
formulations in man: a scintigraphic study, J. Controlled
drugs have unfavourable physicochemical and
Release, 12, 1990, 45.
pharmacokinetic properties. The synthetic polymers can
be designed or modified as per requirement of the 16. Leung, S.‐H.S. and Robinson, J.R., Polymer structure
formulation by altering polymer characteristics and on features contributing to Mucoadhesion II., J. Controlled
Release, 12, 1990, 187.
the other hand natural pharmaceutical excipients are
biocompatible, non toxic, environment friendly and 17. Timmermans, J. and Moes, A.J., How well do floating
economical. Several polymers have been successfully dosage forms float? Int. J. Pharm., 62, 1990, 207.
used and others are being investigated as excipients in 18. Whitehead, L., Floating dosage forms: an in‐vivo study
the design of dosage forms for effective drug delivery. demonstrating prolonged gastric retention, J. Controlled
Release, 55, 1998, 3.
REFERENCES
19. Marler, J.J., Upton, J., Langer, R., and Vacanti, J.P.,
1. Vicky V. Mody, Introduction to Polymeric Drug Delivery,
Transplantation of cells in matrices for tissue regeneration,
Internet Journal of Medical Update, 5(2): 2010 July;1‐2.
Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 33, 1998, 165.
2. Omanathanu Pillai, Ramesh, Polymers in drug delivery,
20. Wang, D., Cathepsin K inhibitor‐polymer conjugates:
Current Opinion in chemical biology, Vol 5, issue 4, 2001,
potential drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis and
447‐451.
rheumatoid arthritis, Int. J. Pharm., 277(1–2), 2004, 73.
3. Omanathanu Pillai, Ramesh, Polymers in drug delivery,
21. Reja M, Quadir MA, Haider SS. Comparative evaluation of
Current Opinion in chemical biology, Vol 5, issue 4, 2001,
plastic, hydrophobic and hydrophilic polymers as matrices
447‐451.
for controlled release drug delivery, J Pharm Sci 692, 2003,
4. Clochard M, Dinand E, Rankin S, Simic S, Brocchini S, New 274‐291.
strategies for polymer development in pharmaceutical
22. Verhoeven, J, Controlled‐release formulations, a
science‐a short review, J Pharm Pharmacol, 2001,
hydrophilic matrix containing furosemide, Int. J. Pharm, 45,
53(9),1175‐ 1184.
1988, 65‐69.
5. Vyas SP, Khar RK. Controlled Drug Delivery: Concepts and
23. Ankita Raizada, Polymers In Drug Delivery: A Review, IJPRD,
Advances. I st ed. Vallabh prakashan, New Delhi,2002,
2(8),2010, 9‐20.
156‐189.Kathryn E. Uhrich ,Scott M. Cannizzaro , Robert S.
Langer, Polymeric Systems for Controlled Drug Release, 24. Nokano M, Ogata A, In vitro release characteristics of
Chem. Rev, 99, 1999, 3181‐3198. matrix tablets, Study of Karaya gum and Guar gum as
releasemodulators, Ind. J. Pharm. Sc, 68, 6, 2006, 824‐826.
6. Reja M, Quadir MA, Haider SS, Comparative evaluation of
plastic, hydrophobic and hydrophilic polymers as matrices 25. Poddar RK, Rakha P, Singh SK, MishraDN, Bioadhesive
for controlledrelease drug delivery, J Pharm Sci 692, 2003, Polymers as a Platform for Drug Delivery: Possibilities and
274‐291. Future Trends, Research J on Phamacetical Dosage Form
and Technology, 2,1,2010, 40‐54.
7. Taylor and Francis, Polymers in Drug Delivery System, 2006,
1‐236. 26. Kiran Sharma, Natural biodegradable polymers as matrices
in transdermal drug delivery, Int. J. Drug Dev. & Res., April‐
8. Hoffman, A.S., Hydrogels for biomedical applications, Adv.
June 3 (2): 2011, 85‐103
Drug Delivery Rev.54, 2002, 3–12.
27. Satturwar, P.M.; Fulzele, S.V.; Dorle, A.K. Biodegradation
9. Park, J.H., Ye, M.L., and Park, K., Biodegradable polymers
and in vivo biocompatibility of rosin: a natural film‐forming
for microencapsulation of drugs, Molecules, 10, 146–161,
polymer. AAPS PharmSciTech. 4, 2003, 1‐6.
2005.
28. Mandaogade, P.M.; Satturwar, P.M.; Fulzele, S.V.; Gogte,
10. Almeida, Biomedical application of polymer based
B.B.; Dorle, A.K. Rosin derivatives: novel film forming
pharmaceuticals, Biomedical Engineering – Group XII,2008.
materials for controlled drug delivery. Reactive Funct.
11. Van Savage, G. and Rhodes, C.T., The sustained release Polym. 50, 2002, 233‐243.
coating of solid dosage forms: a historical review, Drug Dev.
29. Fulzele, S.V.; Satturwar, P.M.; Dorle, A.K. Study of the
Industrial Pharm., 21(1), 1995, 93.
biodegradation and in vivo biocompatibility of novel
12. Longer, M.A., Ch’ng, H.S., and Robinson, J.R., Bioadhesive biomaterials. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 20, 2003, 53‐61.
polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery III:
oral delivery of chlorothiazide using a bioadhesive polymer,
J. Pharm. Sci., 74(4), 1985, 406.
30. Elisangela C, Antonio J, Antonio A, Jose A, Luiz H, 47. Coviello, T.; Alhaique, F.; Dorigo, A.; Matricardi, P.; Grassi,
Preparation and characterization of thermoplastic M. Two galactomannans and scleroglucan as matrices for
starch/zein blends, Mat. Res., 10, 3, 2007, 1516‐ 1439. drug delivery: Preparation and release studies. Eur. J.
Pharm. Biopharm. 66,2007, 200‐209.
31. Carien E. Beneke, Polymeric Plant‐derived Excipients in
Drug Delivery, Molecules 14,2009, 2602‐2620 48. Mythri.G, Novel Mucoadhesive Polymers–A Review, Journal
of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 01 (08); 2011: 37‐42
32. Malafaya, P.B.; Silva, G.A.; Reis, R.L. Natural‐origin
polymers as carriers and scaffolds for biomolecules and cell 49. Duchene D, Touchard F and Peppas N A. Pharmaceutical
delivery in tissue engineering applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. and medical aspects of Bioadhesive system for drug
Rev. 59, 2007, 207‐233. administration. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 14, 1998, 283‐381.
33. Jamzad, S.; Fassihi, R. Development of a controlled release 50. Smart J D, Kellaway I W and Worthington H E C. An in vitro
low dose class II drug‐Glipizide. Int. J. Pharm. 312,2006, 24‐ investigation of mucosa adhesive materials for use in
32. controlled drug delivery. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 36, 1984,
pp. 295‐299.
34. Ridley, B.L.; O’Neill, M.A.; Mohnen, D. Pectins: structure,
biosynthesis and oligogalacturonide related signaling. 51. Andrew G P, Laverty T P and Jones D S. Mucoadhesive
Phytochemistry. 57, 2001, 929‐967. polymeric for controlled drug delivery. European Journal of
Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 71 (3), 2009, 505‐
35. Mohnen, D. Pectin structure and biosynthesis. Curr. Opin.
518.
Plant Biol. 11, 2008, 266‐277.
52. Remuñán‐López C, Portero A, Vila‐Jato J L, Alonso M J.
36. Fry, S.C. Primary cell wall metabolism, tracking the careers
Design and evaluation of chitosan/ethylcellulose
of wall polymers in living plant cells. New Phytol. 161,2004,
mucoadhesive bilayered devices for buccal drug delivery.
641‐675.
Journal of Controlled Release. 55 (2‐3), 1998, pp. 143‐152.
37. Sriamornsak, P.; Thirawong, N.; Weerapol, Y.; Nunthanid,
53. Lehr C M. Lectin‐mediated drug delivery: the second
J.; Sungthongjeen, S. Swelling and erosion of pectin matrix
generation of bioadhesives. J. Control. Release, 65, 2000,
tablets and their impact on drug release behavior. Eur. J.
pp. 19– 29.
Pharm. Biopharm. 67, 2007, 211‐219.
54. Haltner E, Easson J H and Lehr C M. Lectins and bacterial
38. Cárdenas, A.; Goycoolea, F.M.; Rinaudo, M. On the gelling
invasion factors for controlling endo and transcytosis of
behaviour of ‘nopal’ (Opuntia ficus indica) low metholoxyl
bioadhesive drug carrier system. Euro. J. Pharm. Biopharm,
pectin. Carbohydr. Polym. 73, 2008, 212‐222.
44, 1997, pp. 3‐13.
39. Vervoort, L.; Kinget, R. In vitro degradation by colonic
55. Smart J D. Lectin‐mediated drug delivery in the oral cavity.
bacteria of inulinHP incorporated in Eudragit RS films. Int. J.
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 56 (4), 2004, pp. 481‐489.
Pharm. 129, 1996, 185‐190.
56. Hietanen J and Salo O P. Binding of four lectins to normal
40. Vervoort, L.; Van den Mooter, G.; Augustijns, P.; Kinget, R.
human oral mucosa. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 92
Inulin hydrogels. I. Dynamic and equilibrium swelling
(5), 2007, pp. 443 – 447.
properties. Int. J. Pharm. 172, 1998, 127‐135.
57. Sharma A, Sharma S and Khuller G K. Lectin‐functionalized
41. Sudhakar, Y.; Kuotsu, K.; Bandyopadhyay, A.K. Buccal
poly (lactide‐co‐glycolide) nanoparticles as oral/aerosolized
bioadhesive drug delivery – A promising option for orally
antitubercular drug carriers for treatment of tuberculosis.
less efficient drugs. J. Control. Release 114, 2006, 15‐40.
The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 54 (4), 2004,
42. Sarmento, B.; Ribeiro, A.; Veiga, F.; Sampaio, P.; Neufeld, pp. 761‐766.
R.; Ferreira, D. Alginate/Chitosan nanoparticles are
58. S. Roy, Polymers in Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery System: A
effective for oral insulin delivery. Pharm. Res. 24,2007,
Brief Note, designed monomer and polymer 12 (2009),
2198‐2206.
483‐495.
43. Ching, A.L.; Liew, C.V.; Heng, P.W.S.; Chan, L.W. Impact of
59. Saravana Kumar, Polymers in Mucoadhesive Microsphere
cross‐linker on alginate matrix integrity and drug release.
Drug Delivery System Review, JGTPS July‐September ‐ Vol.2
Int. J. Pharm. 355, 2008, 259‐268.
(3), 2011, 249‐263.
44. Nerurkar, J.; Jun, H.W.; Price, J.C.; Park, M.O. Controlled‐
60. Raj Kumar Poddar, Pankaj Rakha, SK Singh and DN Mishra,
release matrix tablets of ibuprofen using cellulose ethers
Bioadhesive Polymers as a Platform for Drug Delivery:
and carrageenans: effect of formulation factors on
Possibilities and Future Trends, Research J on
dissolution rates. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 61, 2005, 56‐68.
Pharmaceutical Dosage Form and Technology, 2,1,
45. Mohamadnia, Z.; Zohuriaan‐Mehr, M.J.; Kabiri, K.; Jamshidi, 2010,40‐54.
A.; Mobedi, H. Ionically cross‐linked carrageenan‐alginate
61. Ebihara., Controlled release formulations to increase the
hydrogel beads. J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn. 19, 2008, 47‐
bioadhesive properties, Drug Res, 33,1983, 163.
59.
46. Varshosaz, J.; Tavakoli, N.; Eram, S.A. Use of natural gums
and cellulose derivatives in production of sustained release
Metoprolol tablets. Drug Deliv. 13,2006, 113‐119.
*********************