Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
To cite this article: Samreen Shafiq & Tamara Pringsheim (2018): Using antipsychotics
for behavioral problems in children, Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, DOI:
10.1080/14656566.2018.1509069
REVIEW
CONTACT Tamara Pringsheim tmprings@ucalgary.ca Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Psychiatry, Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences,
University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, AB T2N 4Z6 Calgary, Canada
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
2 S. SHAFIQ AND T. PRINGSHEIM
the safety and tolerability of risperidone were also reported. substitution to placebo. Relapse rate was defined as a 25%
Meta-analysis of the results of the three trials demonstrated a increase in the ABC-Irritability Subscale. The relapse rate for
mean difference on the ABC-Irritability Subscale of −8.34 irritability after the discontinuation of risperidone was signifi-
points for the risperidone group compared to placebo after cantly higher in the placebo-treated group (62.5%) compared
6–8 weeks of treatment (95% CI −11.72 to −4.96, tau2 = 4.49, to the group receiving continued risperidone (12.5%) [25].
I2 = 55%, P value < 0.00001) (see Figure 1). This change from Similar results were observed by Troost et al, in which study
the baseline after 6–8 weeks of treatment is considered clini- subject selection, length, protocol and primary outcomes
cally important. In fact, Shea et al. reported a statistically were identical to the RUPP discontinuation study. The study
significant change in irritability for the risperidone group demonstrated that 67.0% of the children in the placebo
after 2 weeks of treatment. group of the discontinuation phase relapsed on the ABC
irritability scale compared to 25.0% in the risperidone group
[26]. Both studies also reported weight increase for the entire
3.2. Adverse drug reactions related to risperidone in ASD
subject population over the 6 months of treatment, with
The three studies above also investigated the occurrence of RUPP reporting a 5.1 kg increase and Troost et al. reporting
adverse drug reactions (ADR) in both the risperidone and a 5.7 kg increase from the baseline.
control group. The most common ADR was somnolence,
upper respiratory tract infection and weight gain.
Risperidone was associated with somnolence and sedation in
3.4. Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and
72.5% compared to 7.7% of the placebo group in Shea et al.
pharmacogenomic properties of risperidone
and 49.0% vs. 12.0% in RUPP 2002. Kent et al. reported that
the high-dose risperidone group experienced sedation (26.0%) Risperidone is a selective antagonist, which has a high
and somnolence (23.0%) compared to placebo (6.0% for both affinity for 5-HT2, D2, alpha (α1) and α2 adrenergic, and
sedation and somnolence). Upper respiratory tract infections histamine (H1) histaminergic receptors. It also has low to
occurred in 37.5% of the risperidone group compared to moderate affinity for 5-HT1C, 5-HT1D, and 5-HT1A receptors
15.4% in the placebo group in Shea et al. study. Moreover, a [27]. Although the role of serotonin and dopamine has not
systematic review meta-analyzed the results of weight gain in been established in the pathology of ASD and DBD, clinical
the RUPP trial and Shea et al. Children who gained weight in studies demonstrate the efficacy of risperidone in improving
the risperidone group gained an average of 2.7 kg compared irritability [11,21,22,24,28–37]., and this efficacy has been
to 1.0 kg in the control group[24]. Kent et al. report a mean attributed to risperidone’s activity on these pathways [38].
increase of 2.4 kg in individuals receiving high dose risperi- Risperidone is quickly absorbed and distributed in the
done, 1.2 kg receiving low dose risperidone and 0.7 kg receiv- plasma, with a protein binding of 99%. It is extensively
ing placebo. Shea et al. further reports extrapyramidal side- metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP 2D6) in to two
effects (EPS) in 27.5% of children in the risperidone group enantiomers of 9-hydroxyrisperidone. The overall clinical
compared to 12.8% in the placebo group. The RUPP trial effect is exhibited by the combined effect of risperidone
reported the occurrence of EPS with risperidone compared and 9-hydrorisperidone [38]. Certain pharmacogenomics
to placebo as dyskinesia (12.0% vs. 6.0%), tremors (14.0% vs. studies indicate that various genes may influence the clin-
2.0%) and muscle rigidity (10.0% vs. 2.0%). ical efficacy and safety of risperidone. Among these are
HTR2A (code for 5-HT2A), DRD3 (code for D2), HTR2C (code
for 5-HT2c), ABCB1 (code for P-glycoprotein) and CYP2D6
3.3. Long-term treatment with risperidone in ASD
(various alleles). Current studies have resulted in contradict-
Discontinuation studies of risperidone in ASD further evalu- ing outcomes, thus further research in this area is necessary
ate the effectiveness and safety of long-term therapy with [39,40]. Another mediator to clinical response and safety is
risperidone for the treatment of various behavioral symptoms the dose. One study examined the effect low dose of ris-
[25,26]. A study conducted by RUPP examined relapse rates peridone (0.125–0.175 mg/day) compared to high dose
after discontinuing risperidone gradually from responders (1.25–1.75 mg/day). The result indicated that high dose of
after 4 months of treatment. Individuals were initially pro- risperidone significantly improves response on the ABC-
vided with open label treatment with risperidone for Irritability Subscale, however, also increases the incidence
4 months. Responders were randomly allotted to an 8-week of ADR, such increased appetite, weight gain and somno-
trial of either continued risperidone treatment or gradual lence [22].
3.5. Aripiprazole for the treatment of irritability in ASD The responders (≥ 25% improvement in ABC-irritability
Subscale and ≤2 on CGI scale over 12 weeks of treatment)
There are three published RCTs examining the short-term
from phase 1 were enrolled into phase 2. In phase 2, 85
efficacy of aripiprazole on irritability in ASD [41–43] (see
responders were randomly allocated to placebo or aripiprazole
Table 2 for study details). These studies were double-blinded,
in a double-blinded trial for 16 weeks or until relapse. The
randomized-controlled trials, which investigated the efficacy
primary end point was time from randomization to relapse
of aripiprazole for irritability in ASD compared to placebo. The
and the mean change in the ABC-Irritability Subscale. After
study subjects were individuals diagnosed with ASD (as
16 weeks of treatment with aripiprazole or placebo, relapse
defined by DSM-IV) between the ages of 6 and 17 years,
occurred in 35% and 52%, respectively, with a hazard ratio of
with a CGI score of 4 or more or ABC irritability score of 18
0.57 (95% CI, 0.28–1.12). The time to relapse for the aripipra-
or more. The trials were 8 weeks in duration and aripiprazole
zole group was 56 days (95% CI 31 to undefined) and 29 days
was administered at the dose of 1–15 mg per day. Owen et al.
(95% CI 25–45) for the placebo group. Additionally, an overall
further stratified the aripiprazole group according to dosing of
mean increase was reported for the ABC-Irritability Subscale
5, 10 and 15 mg. The primary outcomes studied were the
for both the placebo and aripiprazole group. The mean differ-
mean changes from baseline to endpoint for irritability on
ence between the two groups was −4.40 (95% CI −8.82–0.02),
the ABC scale. The safety and tolerability of aripiprazole were
favoring aripiprazole. The difference in the time to relapse
also reported. Meta-analysis of the three trials resulted in the
(P = 0.097) and mean changes in the irritability ABC subscale
mean difference on the ABC-Irritability Subscale of −5.47
(P = 0.051) were not statistically significant.
points for the aripiprazole group compared to placebo after
Findling et al. also reported ADRs. In the first phase, the
8 weeks of treatment (95% CI −7.66 to −3.28, tau2 = 0.63,
most common ADRs were weight gain (25.2%), somnolence
I2 = 17%, P value < 0.00001) (see Figure 2). This change from
(14.8%) and vomiting (14.2%). Extrapyramidal side-effects
the baseline after 8 weeks of treatment is considered clinically
occurred in 17.4% of individuals in the aripiprazole, of which
relevant.
tremor (6.5%) was most common. During the 16 weeks pla-
cebo discontinuation phase, the most common ADR reported
3.6. Adverse drug reaction related to aripiprazole in ASD in the aripiprazole group compared to placebo were upper
respiratory tract infections (10.3% vs. 2.3%, respectively), con-
A systematic review analyzed the cumulative results from stipation (5.1% vs. 0%, respectively) and movement disorders
Marcus et al. and Owen et al. on the ADRs associated with (5.1% vs. 0%, respectively). Extrapyramidal side-effects
aripiprazole compared to placebo [10]. The most common occurred in 7.7% of patients on aripiprazole and 7.0% of the
side-effects from the two studies were sedation, drooling, patients in the placebo group. Additionally, weight gain in the
and tremor. Individuals in the aripiprazole group were more aripiprazole group was 2.2 kg at the end of phase 2 compared
likely to experience sedation, compared to the placebo group to 0.6 kg for the control group.
(RR 4.28, 95% CI 1.58 to 11.6, tau2 = 0.00, I2 = 0%, P
value = 0.0043). Drooling was also more likely to occur in
the aripiprazole group (RR 9.64, 95% CI 1.29–72.10, tau2 = 0.00, 3.8. Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and
I2 = 0%, P value = 0.027). Tremor was more likely to occur with pharmacogenomic properties of aripiprazole
aripiprazole (RR 10.26, 95% CI 1.37–76.63, tau2 = 0.00, I2 = 0%, Aripiprazole is a partial agonist of 5-HT1A and D2 and an
P value = 0.023). As for other EPS-related side-effects, the antagonist for 5-HT2A. As a partial agonist, aripiprazole has
systematic review reported there was no difference between high affinity to the receptors, however, exhibits limited activity
aripiprazole and the control group for other EPS-related side [45]. The partial agonism of D2 results in reduced upregulation
effects. Additionally, greater weight gain occurred in indivi- of the receptor while antagonism of 5-HT2A increases dopa-
duals in the aripiprazole group compared to the placebo mine release. In addition, the partial agonism of 5-HT1A exerts
group, with a mean difference of 1.13 kg (95% CI 0.71–1.54, an anxiolytic effect [45]. Although, the role of dopamine and
tau2 = 0.00, I2 = 0%, P value < 0.00001). Ichikawa et al reported serotonin has not been established in the manifestation of the
somnolence as the most common ADR in the aripiprazole core symptoms of ASD, aripiprazole has demonstrated clinical
group (51.1%) compared to placebo group (8.9%). Salivary efficacy in irritability, hyperactivity, stereotypy and inappropri-
hypersecretion was observed in 4.3% of the aripiprazole ate speech [10,41–44]. Aripiprazole reaches maximum concen-
group compared to 2.2% with placebo. Extrapyramidal side- tration within 2 h of administration. The half-life is between 48
effects were noted in 2.1% of the aripiprazole group and none and 68 h in both children and adults. It is extensively protein
in the placebo group. Weight gain was not considered signifi- bound and metabolized by CYP 2D6 and CYP 3A4 to aripipra-
cant between the aripiprazole and placebo group (1.24 kg vs. zole and dehydroaripiprazole. Some studies indicate that poor
0.58 kg, P value = 0.085). metabolizers of CYP 2D6 and 3A4 are hypothetically linked to
increased adverse events [45].
3.7. Long-term treatment with aripiprazole in ASD
3.9. Use of lurasidone for the treatment of irritability in
One placebo discontinuation study of aripiprazole has been
ASD
conducted in children and youth with ASD [44]. This study was
performed in two phases. In phase 1, all subjects were treated Currently, one double-blinded RCT has investigated the short-
with aripiprazole for 13–26 weeks in a single-blinded setting. term clinical efficacy of lurasidone in ASD [46] (see Table 3).
6
S. SHAFIQ AND T. PRINGSHEIM
The study subjects were diagnosed with ASD and required an Many investigations have explored neurobiological path-
ABC-Irritability Subscale score ≥18 and CGI score of ≥4. The ways in the manifestation of aggression and callousness in
subjects were randomly allocated to placebo (n = 50), lurasi- ODD and CD. Research indicates the role of amygdala reactiv-
done 20 mg (n = 49) and lurasidone 60 mg (n = 51). The ity in the processing of stressful situations. Individuals with CD
primary outcome was the mean change on the ABC-Irritability and high callousness have demonstrated hyporeactivity of
Subscale score from baseline to the end of 6 weeks treatment. amygdala when exposed to fearful faces. These individuals
The mean difference in change scores between lurasidone appear to process stressful situations with unemotional ten-
20 mg and placebo was −1.3 (95% CI −5.6–3.0, p = 0.55). dencies. In contrast, hyperreactivity of the amygdala is evident
Similarly, the mean difference between lurasidone 60 mg in individuals with CD and low callousness, accounting for
and placebo was −1.9 (95% CI −6.1–2.2, p = 0.36). The most inclination toward aggressiveness in perceived stressful situa-
common treatment-emergent adverse event was vomiting tions [53]. The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis also
(28.0% in lurasidone 60 mg, 8.0% in lurasidone 20 mg, and regulates biological responses to stress. Studies have demon-
4.0% in placebo). Somnolence occurred in 18.0% of the lura- strated varying levels of cortisol in individuals with CD. Low
sidone 60 mg group, 6.0% of the lurasidone 20 mg group and levels of cortisol has been associated with callousness, while
4.0% of placebo. Weight gain occurred in 8.0% of the lurasi- high levels may be involved in exhibition of anxiety and
done group compared to 2.0% of placebo group. The mean aggressive behavior [53]. The reactivity of limbic system (i.e.
weight gain in lurasidone was 1.2 kg compared to 0.4 kg of amygdala, hypothalamus) is postulated to stimulate the upper
the placebo group (p = 0.015) [46]. brainstem and subsequent regulation of neurotransmitters
Lurasidone is an antagonist of 5-HT2A, 5-HT7 and D2 recep- release. Dopamine, 5-HT and noradrenergic hormones may
tors and a partial agonist for 5-HT1A receptors [47]. Although, be involved in the manifestation of aggression. Investigations
risperidone has similar pharmacodynamic activity as lurasi- have linked both high and low levels of serotonin to aggres-
done, comparatively, lurasidone has not demonstrated clinical sion. However, low levels of serotonin is also associated with
efficacy in ASD [46]. Lurasidone is rapidly absorbed and increased dopaminergic and noradrenergic activity, via sys-
reaches maximum concentration in 1–3 h. The administration temic imbalance. This increased activity is associated with
of lurasidone with food increases the area under the curve impulsivity and irritability [54].
(AUC) and maximum concentration by 2–3 fold. Additionally, it
is extensively protein bound and metabolized primarily by CYP
3A4 into 3 active metabolites [48]. 4.1. Risperidone for ODD/CD in individuals with
subaverage IQ
To date, five RCTs have studied the effect of risperidone on
4. Disruptive behavior disorders
ODD/CD in individuals with subaverage IQ [30–34] (see
DBD are a set of disorders which include oppositional defiant Table 4). These studies investigated the short and long term
disorder (ODD), CD and DBD not otherwise defined (DBD-NOS) effects of risperidone compared to placebo in a double-
[13]. Generally, these disorders are characterized by persistent blinded, randomized setting. The study subjects were indivi-
lack of inhibition and constraints over emotions and behavior. duals diagnosed with ODD or CD (as defined by DSM-IV) with
Emotional dysregulation is a key feature of ODD, which is or without ADHD between the ages of 5 and 18 years, with IQ
usually expressed through anger/irritable mood, defiant and between 36–85. The trials ranged from 4 weeks to 6 months in
argumentative behavior, or vindictiveness. CD is manifested as duration and risperidone was administered at the dose of 0.4–
aggression and callousness toward society that usually results 3.8 mg per day. The primary outcomes were the mean
in the violation of rights of others [49]. In 2010, a systematic changes from the baseline to end point in conduct problems,
analysis investigated the worldwide prevalence of CD and as measured by N-CBRF, Overt Aggression Scale (OAS-M), ABC
ODD to be 3.2% and 3.3%, respectively [50]. and CGI. A systematic review analyzed the standardized mean
Comorbidity of ODD and CD may occur, with ODD usually difference (SMD) between risperidone and placebo for con-
preceding CD in childhood [51]. Up to 60% of the individuals duct problems and aggression in a meta-analysis of study data
with ADHD have co-occurring ODD and 15% have CD [52]. from the three trials which provided data on end point or
Poor outcomes in overall childhood development and prog- change scores [11]. These results are demonstrated in Figure 3.
nosis of ADHD have been associated with the presence of The SMD was 0.98 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.38, I2 = 55%, P < 0.00001)
ODD or CD [52]. for the risperidone group compared to the placebo group
8 S. SHAFIQ AND T. PRINGSHEIM
bias
Risk
of
observed a significant decrease in the mean score of NCBRF
scale after 1 week of treatment. The ADR most commonly
small mean changes at Week 6 in the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale total score
Treatment with lurasidone (20 and 60 mg/day vs. placebo) was associated with
(0.08 and −0.12 vs. 0.00) and the Simpson Angus Scale 10-item mean score
triglycerides (median change, 13.0 vs. −4.0 mg/dL) and cholesterol (median
There was an increase for the lurasidone 60 mg/day group versus placebo in
Increased weight was observed in all three treatment groups at Week 6. The
reported in the three trials was somnolence for risperidone
placebo, but a greater increase was noted for the lurasidone 60 mg/day
increased weight was similar for lurasidone 20 mg/day compared with
compared to placebo (Aman et al. reported 51% vs. 10%,
Snyder et al. reported 41.5% vs. 14.0%, Buitelaar et al reported
10.5% vs. 0%). Increase in appetite was also observed (Aman
et al. reported 15.0% vs 2.0%, Snyder et al. reported 15.1% vs.
3.5%). Although, Aman et al. and Snyder et al. indicate that the
incidence of EPS was not significantly different between pla-
cebo and risperidone, prolactin was significantly higher in the
Adverse effects
day, Lurasidone
60 mg/day, or
length of Rx
group. Aman et al. reported a 1.8 kg weight gain in the effects and drug induced movement disorders. One small RCT
risperidone group compared to −1.2 kg in the placebo group. of quetiapine for conduct problems in youth with CD suggests
some benefit compared to placebo. One long-term placebo
discontinuation study of risperidone in DBD demonstrated a
4.4. Quetiapine in individuals with CD lower risk of relapse with continued risperidone treatment.
One double blind randomized controlled trial investigated the
effects of quetiapine in adolescents with CD [55](see Table 5).
Subjects included were diagnosed with CD as per the overt 6. Expert opinion
aggression scale score of ≥25 and CGI score of ≥4. The trial Irritability and aggression are potentially debilitating conse-
was of 6 weeks duration and quetiapine was administered at a
quences of ASD and DBD. The presence of aggression in DBD
dose of 200–600 mg per day. Nine individuals were rando- and irritability in ASD is associated with poor quality of life for
mized to quetiapine and 10 to placebo. The primary outcome patients and their families [52,57,58]. For healthcare providers,
was improvement in CGI severity scores. After 6 weeks of
the management for behavioral symptoms in children across
treatment, CGI severity scores were lower by 1.80 units (95% diagnostic categories must be individualized to the patient,
CI −0.53 to −3.10, P = 0.007) in the quetiapine group com- with a focus on the identification of environmental triggers
pared to the placebo group. In this study, the occurrence of
and the implementation of behavioral strategies. It is recom-
drug related side-effects were not considered significantly mended that management begin with parent/caretaker train-
different between quetiapine and placebo. ing and counseling sessions [59,60]. The use of antipsychotics
Quetiapine is an antagonist for 5-HT2A and D2 receptors.
should be reserved for severe cases, where harm to self or
The exact mechanism of antipsychotic effect is unknown, others is present or imminent.
however may involve down-regulation of 5-HT2A and partial Current treatment guidelines on the management and sup-
agonism of 5-HTIA. Quetiapine is quickly absorbed after oral port of children and young people with ASD make recommen-
ingestion and is 83.0% protein bound. It is primarily metabo- dations on behavior that challenges [61]. First and foremost,
lized by CYP 3A4 [56]. factors that increase the risk of challenging behaviors should
be assessed and addressed, including impairments in commu-
nication, coexisting physical and mental health disorders, the
5. Conclusion
environment, changes in routine, onset of puberty, the
For the treatment of irritability in ASD, there are three short- absence of structure, and inadvertent reinforcement of beha-
term RCTs of risperidone and three short-term RCTs of aripi- vioral problems. If no trigger is identified, psychosocial inter-
prazole, all demonstrating superiority to placebo for this out- ventions should be offered as first-line treatments.
come. Adverse effects also have been demonstrated with Antipsychotics are only to be considered when psychosocial
treatment, including a higher risk of upper respiratory tract or other interventions are insufficient or cannot be delivered
infections, sedation, metabolic effects, increased prolactin (for due to the severity of behavioral problems. A recent systema-
risperidone) and drug-induced movement disorders. One RCT tic review of pharmacological treatments for severe irritability
of lurasidone for irritability in ASD did not demonstrate super- and problem behaviors found that only one other medication
iority over placebo. Two long-term placebo discontinuation (besides risperidone and aripiprazole) showed a moderate to
studies of risperidone in ASD have shown higher rates of large effect for treating irritability in ASD – N-acetylcysteine
relapse of symptoms in individuals randomized to placebo [12]. N-acetylcysteine is an antioxidant/glutamatergic modula-
after four months of successful treatment with risperidone. tor for which one small trial of 33 children demonstrated an
One long-term placebo discontinuation study of aripiprazole improvement on the ABC-Irritability Subscale after 12 weeks of
in ASD did not demonstrate a difference in symptom relapse treatment [62].
rates between children randomized to continued aripiprazole The initial treatment of children and youth with ADHD with
treatment versus placebo. disruptive and aggressive behavior includes the use of psy-
For the treatment of aggression and disruptive behavior chosocial interventions and psychostimulants to treat core
associated with ADHD, ODD, CD with and without low IQ, six ADHD symptoms [63]. Psychostimulants have demonstrated
of seven short-term RCTs demonstrate superiority of risperi- efficacy for overt and covert aggression, as well as opposi-
done to placebo for this outcome. Again, adverse effects are tional behavior and conduct problems in children with ADHD
demonstrated, including sedation, metabolic effects, hormonal [11]. If these strategies are ineffective, there is evidence to
Table 5. Included studies risperidone and quetiapine, disruptive behaviour disorders and normal IQ.
Study, date, location,
population Intervention and length of Rx Behavioral outcome Adverse effects Risk of bias
Risperidone, Aggressive behavior and conduct problems in children with disruptive Behavior disorders and normal IQ
Armenteros 2007 Risperidone 1.08 mg/d vs. placebo Children’s aggression scale – parent (CAS-P) Abdominal pain and vomiting were experienced by more Allocation concealment unclear.
USA 4 weeks CAS-P: % of subjects in each group improving by more than than 10% of the risperidone-treated subjects. There was
Children 7–12 with 30% from baseline to end point: no significant difference between groups in average
ADHD & aggression Risperidone = 100% weight change. There were no dropouts due to adverse
N = 25 Placebo = 77% p < 0.05 effects.
ODD/CD 76% Children’s aggression scale – teacher (CAS-T)
CAS-T: Showed no significant difference between groups.
Findling 2000 Risperidone 0.028 ± 0.004 mg/kg/d Rating of Aggression Against People or Property Scale No subjects experienced parkinsonian symptoms, an acute More than 20% did not finish
USA 10 weeks (RAAPP) dystonic reaction, or any abnormal involuntary trial.
Youth 5–15 with conduct RAAPP: Difference from baseline to week 10: movements. The mean predicted end-of-study weight
disorder Risperidone = −1.65 ± 0.40 (SE) gain was 4.2 ± 0.7 kg for the risperidone group
N = 20 Placebo = −0.16 ± 0.54 (SE) compared to 0.74 ± 0.9 kg for the placebo group. There
Excluded youth with p = 0.03 was discontinuation in 1 participant in the risperidone
moderate to severe Effect size 1.05 group due to adverse effects.
ADHD
Aman 2014 Risperidone 1.7 ± 0.75 mg/day vs. Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form Disruptive behavior Gastrointestinal upset
USA placebo, added to parent Total (NCBRF D-Total) Risperidone 16.4%
Children 6–12 with ODD/ training in behavior NCBRF D-Total at baseline, after openly titrated stimulant Placebo 5.0% p = 0.03
CD, ADHD, serious management and openly titrated (3 weeks), and after augmentation with risperidone or Prolactin level
physical aggression, stimulant therapy placebo (9 weeks): Risperidone 36.0 ± 27.5 μg/L
and seriously 6 weeks Risperidone: 42.1 ± 10.4, 25.9 ± 15.2, 10.7 ± 9.0 Placebo 7.1 ± 9.3 μg/L, p < 0.001
disruptive behavior Placebo: 43.5 ± 10.3, 24.9 ± 15.3, 17.8 ± 15.4 Significantly greater weight gain with risperidone vs.
N = 168 p = 0.01 at week 9, ES = 0.43 from baseline to week 9, placebo (p < 0.0001).
ODD/CD 100% ES = 0.50 from week 3 to 9 There were 2 dropouts in the risperidione augmented
Estimate for comparison of therapies at week 9 (based on group and 1 dropout in the placebo group due to
results of linear mixed-model): 0.67 (95%CI = 0.14, 1.20) adverse effects.
Jahangard 2017 Risperidone 0.5 mg/day vs placebo, Conners’ Parent Rating Scale Revised Long Version, Weight gain
Iran added to methylphenidate and Oppositional Problems subscale Placebo −0.62 kg
Children 7–10 with family therapy Baseline Risperidone 2.34 (SD 0.31) Risperidone + 1.4 kg
ADHD and ODD 8 weeks End point Risperidone 1.71 (SD 0.29) Waist circumference increased significantly with risperidone
N = 84 Baseline Placebo 2.39 (SD 0.32) compared to placebo
End point Placebo 1.92 (SD 0.27) Significant increase in prolactin observed with risperidone
Effect size 0.75 (0.31, 1.19)
Quetiapine, adolescents with conduct disorder
Connor 2008 Quetiapine 294 mg/d ± 78 mg vs. CGI-S: Baseline to end point: The quetiapine group had an average weight gain of 2.3 kg Allocation concealment unclear;
USA placebo Quetiapine = 5.9 ± 0.6 to 3.4 ± 1.1 compared to 1.1 kg in the placebo group, but this method of randomization not
Adolescents 12–17 with 6 weeks Placebo = 5.5 ± 1.2 to 5.0 ± 0.6 p < 0.01 difference was not significant. stated in methods; major
conduct disorder CGI-S scores were estimated (based on regression results Neither group reported any neurological abnormalities as differences between groups at
N = 19 from mixed-effects models) to decline by 1.80 units (95% rated by the Neurological Rating scale or the Abnormal baseline.
CI = −0.53, −3.10) more with quetiapine compared to Involuntary Movement Scale. Discontinuation due to
placebo, corresponding to an effect size of 1.6 (95% adverse events occurred in 1/9 of the quetiapine group,
CI = 0.9, 3.0) 0/10 in the placebo group.
CGI-I ≥ 2 improvement:
Quetiapine = 8/9 patients
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
support the use of atomoxetine, guanfacine and clonidine for gain, manifesting as an increase in body mass index and waist
oppositional behavior and conduct problems associated with circumference percentiles.
ADHD [63]. As the side effect burden of these medications is Health care professionals advising families with children
lower than with antipsychotics, their use is preferable over and youth with behavioral problems about treatment options
risperidone. If adequate symptom control is not achieved should participate in shared decision-making. It is essential
with the use of atomoxetine, guanfacine or clonidine, or they that patients are aware of all treatment options, both medical
are contraindicated or intolerable, a trial of risperidone may be and behavioral, their benefits and risks, and that their values
attempted. If risperidone is ineffective, there is very little and beliefs are incorporated into treatment decisions. Making
evidence to support the use of other antipsychotics. decisions about the treatment of behavioral symptoms in
If antipsychotics are prescribed for behavioral problems, children is stressful and difficult for parents, due to the variety
short-term treatment (less than 3 months) at the lowest effec- of potential management strategies, the diversity of health
tive dose is recommended due to the accumulation of adverse care professionals involved, and feelings of guilt and inade-
effects with continued treatment, and evidence to suggest quacy with respect to parenting. Providing excellent decisio-
some waning of clinical efficacy with prolonged treatment. If nal support should be the goal of all practitioners in this area.
no improvement in targeted behaviors is observed after trial Future research on the use of antipsychotics for behavioral
at an adequate dose for six weeks, medication should be problems in children should focus on the identification of
tapered and discontinued. Antipsychotics should only be pre- individual factors associated with adverse effects, and strate-
scribed for this purpose by physicians with expertise in the gies to mitigate or prevent them. Health systems should focus
assessment and treatment of behavioral problems in children, on providing greater accessibility to psychosocial and beha-
which includes developmental pediatricians, psychiatrists and vioral treatments for children and families.
neurologists. Antipsychotic medications should be considered
a temporary solution for very severe irritability or aggression
Funding
while behavioral strategies are employed for long-term man-
agement. Gradual tapering of antipsychotic medication over Funding for this article was provided by the Owerko Centre, Alberta
several weeks to months can be attempted after sustained Children’s Hospital Research Institute.
improvement of behavioral symptoms. Some children with
severe disability related to irritability in ASD or aggressive
and disruptive behavior in the context of ADHD, ODD, and Declaration of interest
CD require longer courses of therapy and have difficulty wean- The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any
ing off medication. In these situations, the need for drug organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with
the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes
safety monitoring is crucial so patients and families can
employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert
make informed choices regarding the benefits and risks of testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties
treatment.
Drug safety monitoring of second and third generation
antipsychotics includes assessment for metabolic, hormonal Reviewer disclosures
and extrapyramidal adverse effects. The occurrence of these
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other
side-effects are evident in children across numerous pediatric relationships to disclose.
psychiatric conditions [64,65]. Evidence-based guidelines are
available on the routine assessment for these adverse effects.
The CAMESA (Canadian Alliance for Monitoring Effectiveness References
and Safety of Antipsychotic medications in children) [66]
Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (•) or of
guideline provides recommendations on the type and timing
considerable interest (••) to readers.
of monitoring procedures specific to each antipsychotic med- 1. Pringsheim T, Lam D, Patten SB. The pharmacoepidemiology of
ication. These monitoring activities allow early detection of antipsychotic medications for Canadian children and adolescents:
adverse effects. Due to the high incidence of adverse meta- 2005–2009. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011;21(66):537–
bolic effects associated with both risperidone and aripiprazole, 543.
2. Ronsley R, Scott D, Warburton WP, et al. A population-based study
anticipatory counseling is advised. Patients, parents and care-
of antipsychotic prescription trends in children and adolescents in
givers should be informed that appetite stimulation com- British Columbia, from 1996 to 2011. Can J Psychiatry. 2013;58
monly occurs with these medications and results in weight (6):361–369.
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY 13
3. Alessi-Severini S, Biscontri RG, Collins DM, et al. Ten years of anti- pervasive developmental disorders. Pediatrics . 2004;114(5):e634–
psychotic prescribing to children: a Canadian population-based 41. PubMed PMID: 15492353.
study. Can J Psychiatry. 2012;57(1):52–58. •• Results used in meta-analysis of risperidone efficacy and
4. Murphy AL, Gardner DL, Cooke C, et al. Prescribing trends of safety in ASD.
antipsychotics in youth receiving income assistance: results from 22. Kent JM, Kushner S, Ning X, et al. Risperidone dosing in children
a retrospective population database study. Biomed Cent Psychiatry. and adolescents with autistic disorder: a double-blind, placebo-
2013;13:198. controlled study. J Autism Dev Disord . 2013;43(8):1773–1783.
5. Lao KSJ, Tam AWY, Wong ICK, et al. Prescribing trends and indica- PubMed PMID: 23212807.
tions of antipsychotic medication in Hong Kong from 2004 to 2014: •• Results used in meta-analysis of risperidone efficacy and
general and vulnerable patient groups. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug safety in ASD.
Saf. 2017;26(11):1387–1394. PubMed PMID: 28665012. 23. RUPP. Risperidone in children with autism and serious behavioural
6. Verdoux H, Pambrun E, Cortaredona S, et al. Antipsychotic pre- problems. New England J Med. 2002;347(5):314–321.
scribing in youths: a French community-based study from 2006 to •• Results used in meta-analysis of risperidone efficacy and
2013. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;2410:1181–1191. PubMed safety in ASD.
PMID: 25564132. 24. Jesner OS, Aref-Adib M, Coren E. Risperidone for autism spectrum
7. Montastruc F, Benard-Laribiere A, Noize P, et al. Antipsychotics use: disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;(1):
2006–2013 trends in prevalence and incidence and characteriza- CD005040. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005040.pub2
tion of users. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;74(5):619–626. PubMed •• Cochrane review for risperidone on efficacy and safety in ASD.
PMID: 29307053. 25. Network RUoPPA. Risperidone treatment of autistic disorder:
8. Halfdanarson O, Zoega H, Aagaard L, et al. International trends in longer-term benefits and blinded discontinuation after 6 months.
antipsychotic use: a study in 16 countries, 2005–2014. Eur Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(7):1361–1369.
Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;27(10):1064–1076. PubMed PMID: •• Long-term effects of risperidone in ASD.
28755801. 26. Troost PW, Lahuis BE, Steenhuis MP, et al. Long-term effects of
9. Patten SB, Waheed W, Bresee L. A review of pharmacoepidemiolo- risperidone in children with autism spectrum disorders: a placebo
gic studies of antipsychotic use in children and adolescents. Can J discontinuation study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry .
Psychiatry. 2012;57(12):717–721. 2005;44(11):1137–1144. PubMed PMID: 16239862.
10. Hirsch LE, Pringsheim T. Aripiprazole for autism spectrum disorders •• Long-term effects of risperidone in ASD.
(ASD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD009043. PubMed 27. Troost PW, Althaus M, Lahuis BE, et al. Neuropsychological effects
PMID: 27344135. of risperidone in children with pervasive developmental disorders:
•• A useful systematic review. a blinded discontinuation study. J Adolescenmt Psychopharmacol.
11. Pringsheim T, Hirsch L, Gardner D, et al. The pharmacological manage- 2006;16(5):561–573.
ment of oppositional behaviour, conduct problems, and aggression in •• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and
children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, safety in DBD.
oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder: a systematic 28. McCracken JT, McGough J, Shah B, et al. Risperidone in children
review and meta-analysis. Part 2: antipsychotics and traditional with autism and serious behavioral problems. New England J Med.
mood stabilizers. Can J Psychiatry. 2015;60(2):52–61. 2002;347(5):314–321.
•• Systematic review. •• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and
12. Fung LK, Mahajan R, Nozzolillo A, et al. Pharmacologic treatment of safety in DBD.
severe irritability and problem behaviours in autism: a systematic 29. Pandina GJ, Bossie CA, Youssef E, et al. Risperidone improves
review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;137(s2):e20152851K. behavioral symptoms in children with autism in a randomized,
•• A useful systematic review. double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Autism Dev Disord.
13. Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disor- 2007;37(2):367–373. PubMed PMID: 17019624.
ders. Washington DC, USA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. •• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and
14. Elsabbagh M, Divan G, Koh YJ, et al. Global prevalence of autism safety in DBD.
and other pervasive developmental disorders. Autism Res. 2012;5 30. Snyder R, Turgay A, Aman M, et al. Effects of risperidone on con-
(3):160–179. PubMed PMID: 22495912; PubMed Central PMCID: duct and disruptive behavior disorders in children with subaverage
PMCPMC3763210. IQs. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;41(9):1026–1036.
15. Aman MG, Arnold M, Eugene L, et al. Acute and long-term safety •• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and
and tolerability of risperidone in children with autism. J Adolesc safety in DBD.
Psychopharmacol. 2005;15(6):869–884. 31. Aman MG, De Smedt G, Derivan A, et al. Double-blind, placebo-
16. Stefanatos GA. Chapter 4: neuropathology of autism. In: Reber M, controlled study of risperidone for the treatment of disruptive
editors. The Autism spectrum: scientific foundations and treatment behaviors in children with subaverage intelligence. Am J
[Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Psychiatry. 2002;159:1337–1346.
17. Anderson GM. Chapter 22: serotonin in Autism. In: Bauman ML and •• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and
Kemper TL, editors. The neurobiology of Autism [Internet]. Baltimore: safety in DBD.
Johns Hopkins University Press; 2005. 32. Buitelaar JK, Van Der Gaag RJ, Cohen-Kettenis P, et al. A rando-
18. Wenk GL. Chapter 26: brain derived neurotrophic factor and dopa- mized controlled trial of risperidone in the treatment of aggression
mine in Autism. In: Bauman ML and Kemper TL, editors. The in hospitalized adolescents with subaverage congnitive abilities. J
neurobiology of Autism [Internet]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62:239–248.
University Press; 2005. •• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and
19. Holden JA, Liu X. Chapter 21: the roles of dopamine and norepi- safety in DBD.
nephrine in autism: from behavior and pharmacotherapy to genet- 33. Van Bellinghen M, De Troch C. Risperidone in the treatment of
ics. In: Bauman ML and Kemper TL, editors. The neurobiology of behavioral disturbances in children and adolescents with border-
Autism [Internet]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2005. line intellectual functioning: a double blind, placebo-controlled
20. Blatt GJ. Chapter 23: the GABAergic system in autism. In: Bauman pilot trial. J Adolescenmt Psychopharmacol. 2001;11(1):5–13.
ML and Kemper TL, editors. The neurobiology of Autism [Internet]. •• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2005. safety in DBD.
21. Shea S, Turgay A, Carroll A, et al. Risperidone in the treatment of 34. Reyes M, Buitelaar J, Toren P, et al. A randomized, double-blind,
disruptive behavioral symptoms in children with autistic and other placebo-controlled study of risperidone maintenance treatment in
14 S. SHAFIQ AND T. PRINGSHEIM
children and adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders. Am J •• Results used in meta-analysis for lurasidone efficacy and
Psychiatry. 2006;163(3):402–410. safety in ASD.
•• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and 47. Jaeschke RR, Sowa-Kucma M, Panczyszyn-Trzewik P, et al.
safety in DBD. Lurasidone: the 2016 update on the pharmacology, efficacy and
35. Findling RL, Mcnamara NK, Branicky LA, et al. Study of risperidone safety profile. PubMed PMID: 27203278 Pharmacol Rep.
in the treatment of conduct disorder. J Am Acad Adolesc 2016;684:748–755.
Psychiatry. 2000;39(4):509–516. 48. Findling RL, Goldman R, Chiu YY, et al. Pharmacokinetics and
•• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and tolerability of lurasidone in children and adolescents with psychia-
safety in DBD. tric disorders. Clin Ther. 2015;37(12):2788–2797. PubMed PMID:
36. Aman MG, Bukstein OG, Gadow KD, et al. What does risperidone add 26631428.
to parent training and stimulant for severe aggression in child atten- 49. Association. AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disor-
tion-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? J Am Acad Child Adolesc ders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
Psychiatry. 2014;53(1):47–60 e1. PubMed PMID: 24342385; PubMed 50. Canino G, Polanczyk G, Bauermeister JJ, et al. Does the prevalence
Central PMCID: PMCPMC3984501. of CD and ODD vary across cultures? PubMed PMID: 20532864;
•• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3124845 Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr
safety in DBD. Epidemiol. 2010;45(7):695–704.
37. Jahangard L, Akbarian S, Haghighi M, et al. Children with ADHD 51. Burke JD, Waldman I, Lahey BB. Predictive validity of childhood
and symptoms of oppositional defiant disorder improved in beha- oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: implications
vior when treated with methylphenidate and adjuvant risperidone, for the DSM-V. PubMed PMID: 20853919 J Abnorm Psychol.
though weight gain was also observed - Results from a rando- 2010;119(4):739–751.
mized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Psychiatry 52. Connor DF, Steeber J, McBurnett KA. Review of attention-deficit/
Res. 2017;251:182–191. PubMed PMID: 28213188. hyperactivity disorder complicated by symptoms of oppositional
•• Results used in meta-analysis for risperidone efficacy and defiant disorder or conduct disorder. J Dev Behav Pedriatrics.
safety in DBD. 2010;31:427–440.
38. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals I Risperdal (risperidone) 53. Puzzo I, Smaragdi A, Gonzalez K, et al. Neurobiological, neuroima-
prescribing information. [cited 2018 August 3]. Available from: ging, and neuropsychological studies of children and adolescents
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/ with disruptive behavior disorders. Fam Relat. 2016;65(1):134–150.
020272s056,020588s044,021346s033,021444s03lbl.pdf 54. Stringaris A, Taylor E, editors. Chapter 6: neuroscience of Irritability.
39. Correia CT, Almeida JP, Santos PE, et al. Pharmacogenetics of In: Disruptive mood: irritability in children and adolescents
risperidone therapy in autism: association analysis of eight candi- [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
date genes with drug efficacy and adverse drug reactions. 55. Connor DF, McLaughlin TJ, Jeffers-Terry M. Randomized controlled
Pharmacogenomics J. 2009;10(5):418–430. pilot study of quetiapine in the treatment of adolescent conduct
• Article on pharmacogenetics of risperidone therapy in ASD. disorder. J Adolescenmt Psychopharmacol. 2008;18(2):140–156.
40. Nuntamool N, Ngamsamut N, Vanwong N, et al. Pharmacogenomics •• Results used in meta-analysis for quetiapine efficacy and
and efficacy of risperidone long-term treatment in thai autistic children safety in DBD.
and adolescents. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017;121:316–324. 56. Sanford M, Keating G. Quetiapine. CNS Drugs. 2012;26(5):435–460.
• Article on pharmacogenetics of risperidone therapy in ASD. 57. Sanders JL, Morgan SB. Family Stress and adjustment as perceived
41. Owen R, Sikich L, Marcus RN, et al. Aripiprazole in the treatment of by parents of children with Autism or down syndrome: implications
irritability in children and adolescents with autistic disorder. for intervention. Child Fam Behav Ther. 2008;19(4):15–32.
Pediatrics . 2009;124(6):1533–1540. PubMed PMID: 19948625. 58. Gray DE. Ten years on: a longitudinal study of families of children
•• Results used in meta-analysis for aripiprazole efficacy and with autism. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009;27(3):215–222.
safety in ASD. 59. Knapp P, Chait A, Pappadopulos E, et al. Treatment of maladaptive
42. Marcus RN, Owen R, Kamen L, et al. A placebo-controlled, fixed- aggression in youth: CERT guidelines I. Engagement, assessment,
dose study of aripiprazole in children and adolescents with irrit- and management. Pediatrics. 2012; peds–2010, 1360.
ability associated with autistic disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc 60. Rosato NS, Correll CU, Pappadopulos E, et al. Treatment of mala-
Psychiatry. 2009;48(11):1110–1119. PubMed PMID: 19797985. daptive aggression in youth: CERT guidelines II. Treatments and
•• Results used in meta-analysis for aripiprazole efficacy and ongoing management. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):e1577–e86.
safety in ASD. 61. Crowe BH, Salt AT. Autism: the management and support of chil-
43. Ichikawa H, Mikami K, Okada T, et al. Aripiprazole in the treat- dren and young people on the autism spectrum (NICE Clinical
ment of irritability in children and adolescents with autism Guideline 170). Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2015;100(1):20–23.
spectrum disorder in Japan: a randomized, double-blind, pla- Epub 2014 May 9.
cebo-controlled study. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2017;48 62. Hardan AY, Fung LK, Libove RA. A randomized controlled pilot trial
(5):796–806. PubMed PMID: 28004215; PubMed Central PMCID: of oral N-acetylcysteine in children with autism. Biological
PMCPMC5617873. Psychiatry. 2012;71(11):956–961.
•• Results used in meta-analysis for aripiprazole efficacy and 63. Gorman DA, Gardner DM, Murphy AL, et al. Canadian guidelines on
safety in ASD. pharmacotherapy for disruptive and aggressive behaviour in chil-
44. Findling RL, Mankoski R, Timko K, et al. A randomized controlled dren and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder,
trial investigating the safety and efficacy of aripiprazole in the oppositional defiant disorder, or conduct disorder. Can J Psychiatry.
long-term maintenance treatment of pediatric patients with irrit- 2014;60(2):62–76.
ability associated with autistic disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75 64. Cohen D, Bonnot O, Bodeau N, et al. Adverse effects of second-
(1):22–30. PubMed PMID: 24502859. generation antipsychotics in children and adolescents: a Bayesian
•• Results used in meta-analysis for aripiprazole efficacy and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;32(3):309–316.
safety in ASD. 65. Pillay J, Boylan K, Carrey N, et al. First-and second-generation
45. DeLeon A, Patel N, Crismon ML. Aripiprazole: a comprehensive antipsychotics in children and young adults: systematic review
review of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability. Clin update. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and
Ther. 2004;26:649–666. Quality; 2017.
46. Loebel A, Brams M, Goldman RS, et al. Lurasidone for the treatment 66. Pringsheim T, Panagiotopoulos C, Davidson J, et al. Effectiveness
of irritability associated with autistic disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. CAfM, group SoAiCg. Evidence-based recommendations for mon-
2016;46(4):1153–1163. PubMed PMID: 26659550; PubMed Central itoring safety of second-generation antipsychotics in children and
PMCID: PMCPMC4786592 youth. Paediatr Child Health. 2011;16(9):581–589.