Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Key points
HACCP is an acronym for the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point system. It provides structure for objective assessment of ‘what can go wrong’
and requires controls to be put in place to prevent problems. HACCP is a preventative food safety management system. It originated as part of the USA
manned space programme. It is recognised internationally as the most effective way to pro- duce safe food. The HACCP principles apply a logical and
common sense approach to food control. The application of HACCP is possible throughout the food supply chain from primary production (farmers,
growers) to the consumer. Because it is a step by step approach it is less likely that hazards will be missed. HACCP, therefore, offers increased
confidence to the food business and its customers. HACCP is cost effective through prevention of waste and incident costs. HACCP helps to
demonstrate due diligence where required
I .I What is HACCP?
HACCP is an acronym used to describe the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point system. The HACCP concept is a systematic approach to food
safety management based on recognised principles which aim to identify the hazards that are likely to occur at any stage in the food supply chain and
put into place controls that will prevent them from happening. HACCP is very logical and covers all stages of food production from the growing stage to
the consumer, including all the intermediate processing and distribution activities.
These logical steps form the basis of the by now well known seven principles of HACCP which are accepted internationally. They have been published
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex 1993,1997b) which is the food code established by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the
United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) and also by the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (NACMCF
1992, 1997) in the USA. The HACCP principles outline how to establish, implement and maintain a HACCP system. Codex and NACMCF are the two
main reference documents and are very similar in their approach.
5: Establish the corrective action to be taken when monitoring indicates that a particular CCP is not under control. Principle
6: Establish procedures for verification to confirm that the HACCP system is working effectively. Principle
7: Establish documentation concerning all procedures and records appropriate to these principles and their application.
I .5 Is it difficult to use?
HACCP is often thought of as being complicated, requiring unlimited resources and the expertise associated with large companies. Several specialist
skills are, indeed, required in order to use the HACCP principles successfully, but the basic requirement is a detailed knowledge of the product, raw
materials and manufacturing processes alongside an under- standing of whether any situation which may cause a health risk to the consumer is likely
to occur in the product and process under consideration. With both training and education all personnel involved in the application of HACCP should
be able to understand and apply its concept. However, for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and less developed businesses the application of
the HACCP principles is often found to be more difficult than it first appears. There are a number of reasonsforthis and research into whether HACCP is
appropriate for SMEs is still underway. In the view of the authors, it is notthe size ofthe businessthat makes it difficult, butthe lack of knowledge and
capabilityofthe people who work within the business and the poor standard of existing systems such as good hygiene practice. This type of situation
can be found in any type of company.
HACCP is a proven food safety management system that is based on pre- vention. By identifying where in the process the hazards are likely to occur it
is possible to put into place the control measures required. This ensures that food safety is managed effectively and reduces reliance on the tradi-
tional methods of inspection and testing.
Inspection and testing have traditionally been the methods used in quality control. Exhaustive inspection would appear to be the ultimate approach
towards producing a safe product, at least theoretically. In practice, how- ever, it is not so. Take the example of fruit going down a production line
where operatives use visual inspection for physical contamination such as leaves, stones, insects etc. The effectiveness of this technique is reduced by
several factors such as:
0 Distraction of employees by noise, other activities going on around them, people talking.
0 The span of human attention when carrying out tedious activities. People’s varying powers of observation.
0 To detect chemical and biological hazards 100% testing is simply not possible because such tests are nearly always destructive. Sampling plans are
used instead which are based on:
The span of human attention when carrying out tedious activities. People’s varying powers of observation.
The ability to detect the hazard reliably using analytical techniques, which vary in sensitivity, specificity, reliability and reproducibility. The ability to
trap the hazard in the sample chosen for analysis.
Often random sampling is used and the probability of detecting the hazard is therefore low. Use of statistical sampling techniques will increase the
probability of detection but it can never be absolute unless the whole batch is analysed.