Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Linguistics:
Scientific is the kind of study in which one uses the methodology may
described as that one first makes hypothesis, then verify it and calls it
theory. In short, we follow the following orders.
However, that order may not be followed. Sometime we may have a theory
already in mind, which may lead us to same experiments.
What is Language?
The word "language" is used without any indefinite article. It shows that a
word "language" is applied not only to English, Chinese and Urdu etc. But it
is a variety of other systems of communication, notation, or calculation. This
is the same case as is in French the word "language" is applied to language
in general and the word "langue" is applied to particular languages.
Def.: (1)
(E. Sapir)
Def.: (2)
a) They say only about the arbitrary vocal symbols and thus there is no
reference to written language. However, one cannot speak without using
language, but one can use language without speaking.
b) It tells only about the social function of language and about the
psychological function i.e. how a child acquires language.
Def.: (3)
(Hall)
Def.: (4)
(Chomsky)
a) Chomsky only talks about the structure of language and not about the
symbolic nature of language. He also does not make any reference to
communicative aspects of language.
Firstly, each natural language has a finite number of letters and its alphabets
if it has any alphabetic writing system.
Def.: (5)
Page | 4
(Henry Sweet)
Language
Structure Use
Phonetics: The study of sounds how they are produced and described is
called phonetics.
Morphology: The study of how words are made i.e. (the shape of words) is
called morphology.
Semantics: The branch of linguistics that deals with the study of meaning is
called semantics.
Pragmatics: The branch of linguistics that deals with the study of the use of
a language in proper context. And also deals with the way people actually
used words in daily conversation.
We can also explain it by this way when we say that someone speaks
English, one of the two things either;
Ultimately parole is the set of all utterance that have actually been
produced, while langue is the set of all possible grammatical sentences in
the language from this. It follows that parole is a personal, dynamic, social
activity, which exists at a particular time and place and in a particular
situation as opposed to langue which exists apart from any particular
manifestation in speech.
If one man speaks to another there must be a dialogue. You ask a question
and he give you an answer, so in it a person addresses another.
Language System:
A social or institution which itself is purely abstract (comes out from brain)
i.e. it has no physical existence, but which actualized on particular occasions
in the language behavior of individual members of the language community.
When one speaks the language comes out of brain, thus it is abstract.
Some linguists believe that written language is more important than spoken
language. They argue that spoken language is common. It is spontaneous. It
is used by ordinary people. Its only merit is that in it that you can rely on
gestures. They say that it is not polished and standard but it is substandard
and full of repetition.
I. It is a permanent record.
II. There is standard vocabulary in written language.
III. It is not spontaneous.
IV. There are complete sentences.
V. It is the product of gifted people.
Its only demerit is that it is limited. We cannot follow the rules of written
language in a spoken language, but there is validity in the fact that spoken
language is primary than written language. It is more genuine in scope. It
existed at that time when there was no written language. Had there been no
spoken language, there would have been no written language.
Spoken language is more basic than written language. This does not mean
that language should be identified with speech. Though there exists a close
connection between languages especially natural languages and speeches.
We cannot speak without language but we can use language without speech.
1. Historical Priority:
2. Structural Priority:
Structural priority shows also the priority of speech over writing. The
structure of written sentences depends upon identifiable distinction of shape.
The structure of spoken sentences is upon the identifiable distinctions of
sounds.
The potentiality that letters have for combining with one another is totally
unpredictable in terms of their shape.
3. Functional Priority:
This largely shows the priority of spoken language over written language.
We can see that spoken language serves many functions than written. Even
today in the most literate of modern industrialized and bureaucratic
societies, the spoken language is used for a wider range of purposes than
the written. And writing serves as a functional substitute for speech only in
situations which makes vocal auditory.
4. Biological Priority:
It has now been demonstrated experimentally that babies are capable, in the
very first week of life, of distinguishing speech sounds from other sounds
and are predisposed, as it were, to pay attention to them. Man’s nearest
relatives among the higher primates, though they have much the same
physiological apparatus, do not show the same predisposition to produce or
distinguish the sounds characteristics of human speech. This may be the
principal reason why attempts to teach spoken language to chimpanzees
have failed.
So, biological priority also shows the priority of speech over writing.
Thus, the above priority shows that spoken language is prior to written
language.
Semiotics:
OR
It is the branch of study that deals with signs, symbols and system used for
communication.
As the language has the property of medium transfer ability. So, both
spoken and written language can be transmitted along a variety of channels.
Spoken English can be transmitted in writing while written English can be
transmitted along the vocal-auditory channel (by means of speech).
There are six basic unique and specific properties that contribute to the
flexibility and variety of tongue.
1. Arbitrariness:
Page | 11
There are some words which are non-arbitrary such as “cuckoo” and “crash”
etc. But in majority of words the connection is arbitrary. The non-arbitrary
connection is called onomatopoeia.
It makes system more flexible and adoptable but it also makes it more
difficult to learning. The other disadvantage is that it makes the signals more
difficult to be interpreted by one who does not know the system. However,
the advantages of arbitrariness are more than the disadvantages, and
therefore this property of language cannot be over-looked.
2. Displacement:
3. Discreteness:
Such as sounds in language are meaning fully distinct such as (IPI) and
(IBI) both are biblically not much different but when we form words like
Page | 12
“pack” and “back”. They become totally different; this greatly makes one
word totally different from another is called discreteness of language. Other
example is that vowels (a, e, i, o, u,) are meaningless words but when they
are used along consonants, they give different meaning, e.g. (bit, bat, bet).
Discreteness is not only confined to words but also be extended to syntax
i.e. sentences and structures.
4. Cultural Transmission:
We inherit genetics qualities from parents but do not inherit language from
parents. Instead we acquire it from culture, from other speakers. We may
resemble in genetic qualities such as eyes, the colour of our eyes and hair
etc., to our parents but we do not acquire the language from parental genes.
If children are educated, there will be marked difference between their
language and the language of their parents if they are uneducated.
The proof that language is acquired from culture and society and not from
parental genes is that. If a Pakistani in fact is brought by English speakers in
English society since birth. He will resemble in physical appearance to his
parents but will speak English like the native speakers of English.
Human beings are born with innate pre-disposition to acquire language, but
they are not born with the ability to produce utterances in a specific
language.
5. Productivity:
that have previously neither heard nor used. It is also called creativity.
Human language has the property of productivity i.e. we can come up with
utterances and expressions that we have never heard before. Chomsky also
stressed the importance of productivity. He gives the example of children
who acquire language in a certain age. The child hears only the name of
things but still he learns the complete language. It is all because of
productivity.
6. Duality:
Languages are dual; they are dual in the sense that they have two levels of
structure or organization. These levels are phonological and grammatical.
E.g. in the production of speech we have primary (physical level) to produce
individual sounds such as n, b,i. They may be called phonic symbols. Now if
we combine them in a particular fashion, they give meaning nib, bin, etc.
So,
Most animal communication systems do not have this property. They have
units but are unable to combine them with one another and thus cannot
form sentences or phrases like human languages.
The above six properties which have discussed briefly are all interconnected
in various ways. They are not only present on all languages but present to a
very high degree. These properties make the language, the most scientific
and efficient mean of communication.
The fiction of homogeneity means the belief or assumption that all members
of the same language community speak exactly the same language. It is of
course possible to define the term language community in such a way that it
is made a matter of definition that there should be no systematic difference
of pronunciation grammar or vocabulary in the speech of its members but
we know that even in the same region the people from different social
classes speak different languages and in a different manner communities.
In all the language communities of the world there are differences of accent
and dialect. Accent refers to the way in which the language is pronounced or
it deals only with pronunciation and is not concerned with grammar and
vocabulary etc. Dialect is broad than accent and it refers to every aspect of
language including pronunciation. The two native speakers of a dialect can
use the same dialect but well speak with a different accent e.g. all Pashto
speakers speak the same dialect but with different accent as the word
Peshawar. Some are using (Peshawar) while some are using (Pekhawar).
Another word some are using Nowshera as (Noshar) and some as (Nokhar).
Thus the assumption is falsified that all the people living in the same
language community speak exactly the same language.
1. Regional Dialect:
2. Social Dialect:
The same is the case with social dialect. Social people speak in special
manner while simple people speak in in a simple manner. So we can say that
Page | 15
a) Selection:
b) Codification:
c) Acceptance:
d) Elaboration of Function:
The selected or standard dialect is used in all the important functions the
state machinery such as parliament, in courts of law, in bureaucracy, in
higher education etc. It is also accepted the language of science and
technology.
As we know that all dialects are equal and having similar structures.
Moreover there is no scientific base for the superiority or the interior of
dialect to another. However the standard dialect functions as a unifying force
because it has very large vocabulary.
Is linguistics a science?
Before justifying its claim to science we must know what science is and what
arts are.
Aristotle defines arts as the imitation of life. Different people imitate life in
different ways. Dancer imitates life through the various gestures of body;
painter imitates it through canvas and painting. Musician imitates it through
composition, while the writer imitates it through words. Some imitates
serious and tragic aspects of life and writes tragedies, while other imitates
the non-serious aspects and writes comedies.
Dialogues Tragedy
Serious
Narration Epic
Arts
Dialogues Comedy
Non-Serious
Narration Mock-Epic
Linguistics is also a social science because its subject matter is part of the
behaviour of men and women, when they are interacting with each other.
Linguists either favours external point of view or internal point of view. Now
all the linguists are divided in those two groups. However at the 20th
century this contrast has become very sharp. Bloomfield insisted on external
point of view while Chomsky insists on cognitive or internal point of view.
Empiricism refers to the view that knowledge comes from experience. The
Greek word “empeiria” means experience or more particularly from
perception and sense-data.
Rationalism from the Latin word, ratio meaning in this context mind or
reason. The rationalists emphasize the role that mind plays in the acquisition
of knowledge. In particular, they hold that there are certain a priori concepts
or propositions (a priori means, in its traditional interpretation, “known
independently of experience”) in terms of which the mind interprets the data
of experience.
a) Verification Principle:
Page | 20
b) Reductionism:
This principle tells that some sciences are more basic than others – physics
and chemistry being more than biology, biology being more basic than
physiology or sociology, and so on - and that in the great synthesis of
unified science the concepts and propositions of the less basic science were
to be reduced to (i.e. reinterpreted in terms of) the concepts and
propositions of the more basic sciences. The verification principle has now
been abandoned and the principle of reductionism is far less generally
accepted by scientists and philosophers of science. Than it was when
Bloomfield wrote his classical textbook of linguistics in 1933.
All that has just been said about empiricism, position and the current status
of the so-called scientific method is intended to be more or less factual and
uncontroversial we are now turn to point out controversy.
First Controversy:
The first controversy was that what proper (Austrian, British philosophers
and professors) said that observation is Theory-Laden. While logical
positivists said that it is theoretically natural. Proper attacked the sharp
distinction which logical positivists had drawn between observation and
theory construction. It is held to be a matter of inductive generalization.
There are two points of view, inductive which is from specific to general or
from narrower to broader while deductive is from general to specific or from
broader to narrower.
Page | 21
Proper attacked the view because he believed that observation and data
collection cannot proceed in advance of the formulation of hypothesis that
the scientists wishes to test.
Second Controversy:
There was a time when some linguists thought that it was in principle
possible to escape from the necessity of asking native speakers to make
such intuitive judgments about their language, by simply collecting a large
enough corpus of naturally occurring data and submitting it to an exhaustive
and systematic analysis. However, this school of thought is no longer in
fashion. But the linguists appeal to intuitive evidence remains controversial.
There are two aspects to controversy.
The first aspect relates to the question whether the intuition that the linguist
make reference to some part of the native speaker’s linguistics competence.
If so, on Chomsky’s definition of competence and his formulation of the
goals of linguistics, the intuition themselves become part of what the
description of any particular language most directly account for. Most
linguists do not consider nature speaker’s intuition as data.
The second part of the controversy has to do with their ability of the native
speaker’s judgments. Most linguists believe that meaningful analysis of data
is possible through intuition. However, there is another school of thought
Page | 22
who believe that neither data nor intuition alone sufficient, one should
supplement the other. Non-native speakers know more but he cannot speak
like a native speaker.
For proficient non-native speaker data need is much greater than native
speaker. Because they have unreliable intuition about what is possible in a
language.
When native speaker speaks different dialects they disagree with one
another. The judgment of native speakers are highly unreliable. Sometime a
native speaker rejects something (utterance), unarupt but he himself on
other occasion produces that expression. Therefore we cannot solely rely on
intuition.
Conclusion:
They argue that one should never use double negatives in a sentence such
as
Many of these rules of prescriptive grammar were based on Greek and Latin
languages and traditional grammar as influenced by it. The explanation of
the traditional grammarian for double negatives was that according to it
Standardizing is essential and we will have to agree with certain rules and
regulations as a language. The problem of selecting, standardizing and
promoting one particular language or dialect at the expense of others is
fraught with political and social difficulties.
Semantics is the study of meaning but what is meaning. The answer is not
easy, philosopher have been trying to answer it. Two assumptions, related
to semantics, have been controversial. These assumptions are
This concept-meaning relation, does not answer the question that we asked
in the first paragraph the term concept requires a bit explanation and
definition. This term is vague in this conceptualist theory of meaning. Let us
take a few words they are the, for, I, first, year, little, write three schools
boy, development, name, anything, with some words in this list we can
associate the concept of a visual object/image but what about words like,
Page | 26
Words that we use for certain concepts/ideas do not mean that in contexts.
The words that we use in our daily life do not have a single clear-cut
meaning. Let us look at the following examples.
c) God is live.
d) I believe in God.
e) I believe in democracy.
1. Lexical Meaning:
2. Sentence Meaning:
The meaning of sentence is dependent upon the words which are there in a
sentence. Look at the following sentence.
Some words are given meaning by sentences in which they occur. "Love"
means "affection" but look at the following sentence where love has been
given a different meaning.
It can mean close the window please. This relationship between a sentence
and its meaning is called the characteristic use of the sentence.
3. Utterance Meaning:
Sentences are said to be out of context abstract entities not tied to any
particular time and place. A complete string of words used in context will be
a sentence.
These are the typical examples which can described as utterances and
incomplete or elliptical sentences by the traditional grammarians. The
meaning of utterances are the same as that of the full sentences from which
Page | 28
4. Grammatical Meaning:
In these sentences the form of words “killed” and “shall killed” give a
grammatical meaning to the sentences. The former word i.e. killed tells us
that killing of a snake occurred in the past. The latter word i.e. shall kill
refers to future time.
Page | 29
5. Descriptive Meaning:
The first sentence i.e. (a) has descriptive meaning because it asserts and
describes particular situation. It has a definition worth-value i.e. the
proposition is either true of false. The second sentence is not statement but
a question. It has non-descriptive meaning.
6. Expressive Meaning:
7. Social Meaning:
This means the role of a language. Much of our language has as its principal
purpose. We have utterances for greeting, apology, insrtation etc. Besides,
we have utterances which make us continue our conversation on other
topics. Even scientific and much used utterances have the value to win
Page | 30
The word “statue” does not mean literally its meaning is figurative.
Idioms, clichés, and fixed collections are also used in a language for
figurative meaning. “Put up with”, “round pig in a square hole, leave no
stone unturned, have figurative meaning in sentences.
Page | 31
Page | 32