Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 40

TransmittalNote

Amendment No. 1
to the
SUPPLEMENT TO

ANNEX 4 -AERONAUTICAL CHARTS

(Tenth Edition)

To incorporate Amendment No. 1 to the Supplement:

1. Replace pages (iii) to (x) by the attached new pages dated 17111/03.

2. Remove the existingpages for Australia, Canada, China (Hong Kong SAR), Germany and Uruguay
dated 28/3/02.

3. Insert the following new and replacement pages dated 17111/03:

Australia
Belarus
Canada
Chile
China (Hong Kong SAR)
Cook Islands
Germany
Switzerland
United Kingdom
U~PY
Uzbekistan

4. Record this amendment on page (ii) of the Supplement.


1. Contracting States which have notified ICAO of differences

The Contracting States listed below have notified ICAO of differences which exist between their national regulations and
practices and the International Standards and Recommended Practices of Annex 4 (Tenth Edition) up to an including
Amendment 52, or have commented on implementation.

The page numbers shown for each State and the dates of publication of those pages correspond to the actual pages in this
Supplement.

Date of Pages in Date of


State notification Supplement publication

Argentina
Australia
Belarus
Canada
Chile
China (Hong Kong, SAR)
Cook Islands
Cuba
Denmark
Ecuador
France
Germany
India
Lithuania
Mauritius
New Zealand
Norway
Panama
Slovakia
Sweden
Switzerland
Uganda
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan

2. Contracting States which have notified ICAO that no differences exist


- - - -

Date of Date of
State notification state not~$cation

Bahrain 141710 1 Paraguay 24/8/0 1


Barbados 915101 Portugal 12/10/01
Egypt 14/7/01 Romania 5/10/01
El Salvador 9/7/0 1 Sri Lanka 12/2/0 1
Eritrea 14/5/01 The former Yugoslav Republic
Finland 11/9/01 of Macedonia 29/6/01
Ghana 12/6/01 Togo 1/7/01
Jordan 1/10/01 United Arab Emirates 9/9/0 1
Date of Date of
state notification State notification

Kuwait 1016/01 United Republic of Tanzania 21/6/01


Netherlands 2211010 1 Zimbabwe 1719101
Pakistan 2619101

3. Contracting States from which no information has been received

Afghanistan Estonia Mexico


Albania Ethiopia Micronesia (Federated States of)
Algeria Fiji Monaco
Andorra Gabon Mongolia
Angola Gambia Morocco
Antigua and Barbuda Georgia Mozambique
Armenia Greece Myanmar
Austria Grenada Namibia
Azerbaijan Guatemala Nauru
Bahamas Guinea Nepal
Bangladesh Guinea-Bissau Nicaragua
Belgium Guyana Niger
Belize Haiti Nigeria
Benin Honduras Oman
Bhutan Hungary Palau
Bolivia Iceland Papua New Guinea
Bosnia and Herzegovina Indonesia Peru
Botswana Iran (Islamic Republic of) Philippines
Brazil Iraq Poland
Brunei Darussalam Ireland Qatar
Bulgaria Israel Republic of Korea
Burkina Faso Italy Republic of Moldova
Burundi Jamaica Russian Federation
Cambodia Japan Rwanda
Cameroon Kazakhstan Saint Kitts and Nevis
Cape Verde Kenya Saint Lucia
Central Afiican Republic Kiribati Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Chad Kyrgyzstan Samoa
China Lao People's Democratic Republic San Marino
Colombia Latvia Sao Tome and Principe
Comoros Lebanon Saudi Arabia
Congo Lesotho Senegal
Costa Rica Liberia Serbia and Montenegro
CGte d'Ivoire Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Seychelles
Croatia Luxembourg Sierra Leone
Cyprus Madagascar Singapore
Czech Republic Malawi Slovenia
Democratic People's Republic of Malaysia Solomon Islands
Korea Maldives Somalia
Democratic Republic of the Congo Mali South Africa
Djibouti Malta Spain
Dominican Republic Marshall Islands Sudan
Equatorial Guinea Mauritania Suriname
Swaziland Tunisia Vanuatu
Syrian Arab Republic Turkey Venezuela
Tajikistan Turkmenistan Viet Nam
Thailand Ukraine Yemen
Tonga United States Zambia
Trinidad and Tobago

4. Paragraphs with respect to which differences have been notified

Dzfferences Dzfferences
Paragraph notified by Paragraph notified by

1.1 Belarus Chile


Chile Cook Islands
France Ecuador
1.2.2 United Kingdom New Zealand
1.2.2.1 United Kingdom United Kingdom
1.3.1 Uzbekistan Chile
Australia
Belarus
United Kingdom Australia
Argentina Uruguay
Australia Canada
Canada United Kingdom
United Kingdom Switzerland
A~gentina United Kingdom
Argentina United Kingdom
Argentina United Kingdom
Canada France
Australia United Kingdom
Canada Canada
Germany United Kingdom
Belarus France
Uzbekistan Argentina
Switzerland Chile
Australia United Kingdom
Argentina
Australia Lithuania
Canada Australia
Belarus Belarus
Denmark Canada
France Cook Islands
Germany Cuba
Sweden Ecuador
Germany France
Chile Germany
Switzerland New Zealand
Canada Switzerland
Belarus Uganda
Australia United Kingdom
Belarus Uruguay
Dqferences D@erences
Paragraph notified by Paragraph notified by

Uzbekistan Sweden
Argentina Uruguay
Argentina Uzbekistan
Argentina Cook Islands
Argentina New Zealand
Argentina
Argentina Switzerland
Germany
Chile United Kingdom
Australia France
Belarus Belarus
Canada Belarus
Cook Islands Norway
Cuba Australia
Ecuador Cook Islands
France France
India New Zealand
Lithuania Norway
New Zealand Argentina
Norway Uzbekistan
Switzerland Canada
United Kingdom Uzbekistan
Uruguay Belarus
Uzbekistan Canada
Cook Islands
Australia France
Canada New Zealand
Cuba Sweden
Uganda Argentina
Australia
United Kingdom Belarus
Belarus Canada
Canada Cook Islands
Cook Islands France
Cuba New Zealand
Germany Norway
New Zealand Sweden
Norway
Argentina Australia
Canada Canada
Uzbekistan China (Hong Kong SAR)
Argentina United Kingdom
Australia France
Belarus United Kingdom
Cook Islands China (Hong Kong SAR)
Ecuador Belarus
France Cook Islands
New Zealand United Kingdom
Norway Belarus
Dzfferences Dzferences
Paragraph notified by Paragraph notrjied by

Cook Islands New Zealand


New Zealand United Kingdom
Switzerland Belarus
United Kingdom Switzerland
France Australia
Sweden France
Switzerland Sweden
United Kingdom Switzerland
Cook Islands Australia
Cuba Cook Islands
France Cuba
Germany France
India Germany
New Zealand India
United Kingdom New Zealand
United Kingdom United Kingdom
China (Hong Kong SAR) United Kingdom
Uzbekistan China (Hong Kong, SAR)
Canada Uzbekistan
Chile Canada
United Kingdom Chile
Uzbekistan United Kingdom
Belarus Uzbekistan
Chile 10.9.3 Belarus
Canada Chile
Canada Sweden
France 10.9.3.1 Canada
Germany France
Norway 10.9.3.2 Canada
Australia Germany
Belarus Norway
Cook Islands 10.9.4.1.1 Australia
France Belarus
Germany Cook Islands
New Zealand France
Sweden Germany
Switzerland New Zealand
United Kingdom Sweden
United Kingdom Switzerland
United Kingdom
Canada United Kingdom
China (Hong Kong SAR)
United Kingdom France
France France
United Kingdom United Kingdom
China (Hong Kong SAR) Cook Islands
United Kingdom France
Belarus New Zealand
Cook Islands Belarus
(viii)

Differences Dzflerences
Paragraph notified by Paragraph notified by

France Belarus
Sweden Cook Islands
United Kingdom France
United Kingdom New Zealand
United Kingdom Norway
Belarus Switzerland
Cook Islands United Kingdom
New Zealand France
France United Kingdom
Cook Islands Canada
New Zealand France
United Kingdom Argentina
Switzerland France
Switzerland United Kingdom
France Australia
Switzerland Australia
China (Hong Kong SAR) Cook Islands
Argentina France
Switzerland New Zealand
Argentina United Kingdom
Canada United Kingdom
Chile Cook Islands
Cook Islands New Zealand
France Argentina
Germany Cook Islands
India France
New Zealand New Zealand
Panama France
Switzerland Uzbekistan
Uganda Australia
United Kingdom Cook Islands
Australia France
United Kingdom New Zealand
Cuba Panama
United Kingdom United Kingdom
Uzbekistan
France Australia
France Belarus
United Kingdom France
New Zealand United Kingdom
United Kingdom France
Cook Islands Cuba
France Cook Islands
Belarus New Zealand
United Kingdom Switzerland
Canada Canada
Uzbekistan France
France France
Australia Cook Islands
-

D~ferences D~ferences
Paragraph notifiedby Paragraph notified by

Germany 15.3.2 Belarus


New Zealand 15.5.2 Australia
Switzerland Belarus
France
Australia Germany
Norway United Kingdom
Belarus 15.6 Belarus
Cook Islands Canada
France France
Germany Germany
New Zealand Norway
United Kingdom Switzer1and
Australia United Kingdom
Belarus Uzbekistan
Canada
Chile Chapter 16 Panama
Cook Islands Uruguay
Ecuador 16.2 Lithuania
France 16.2.1 Argentina
Germany Belarus
New Zealand Chile
Norway France
Switzerland Germany
United Kingdom Norway
Chile Switzerland
Cook Islands United Kingdom
New Zealand Uzbekistan
United Kingdom 16.4.6 Australia
16.5.1 Canada
Australia Cuba
Cuba 16.5.2 Argentina
United Kingdom Cuba
Belarus 16.6 Argentina
Cook Islands Canada
New Zealand 16.7.5 Australia
Belarus 16.7.9.3 Australia
Cook Islands Cuba
France 16.9.2 France
Germany 16.9.2.2 Australia
New Zealand 16.9.2.3 Cuba
Belarus 16.9.3.1 Australia
Canada Argentina
Cook Islands 16.9.4 Australia
France Canada
Germany 16.9.5 Argentina
New Zealand Australia
Norway France
Switzerland
Uzbekistan Chapter 17 Uruguay
Differences Differences
Paragraph notified by Paragraph notijied by

Argentina Canada
Belarus Cuba
Chile France
Cuba Germany
Mauritius Lithuania
Uganda Switzerland
Uzbekistan United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom Australia
Australia Belarus
United Kingdom Cuba
Australia Ecuador
Argentina France
Germany Lithuania
Germany Slovakia
France Switzerland
Germany United Kingdom
Australia Uzbekistan
United Kingdom
France Chapter 20 Australia
Argentina Cuba
Australia India
France UWWY
Germany 20.1 Chile
United Kingdom 20.2.1 Argentina
Argentina United Kingdom
Canada
Argentina Appendix 2 Argentina
Canada France
France Germany
United Kingdom
Appendix 6 Germany
Australia
Belarus
CHAPTER 2

2.2 Australian charts carry a title to describe their function. Not all charts are titled in accordance with
the Annex.

2.5.7 The conversion scale is shown for the hypsometric tint scale on all visual charts. The kilometre1NM scale
is shown on all visual charts. The metredfeet scale is being progressively included on all Visual
Navigation Charts (VNC) and Visual Terminal Charts (VTC).

2.11* Charts conform in all colours with the exception that inland waters are coloured green instead of blue.

2.12.3.1 Spot heights of doubtful accuracy are currently shown in brackets. Compliance with the "k" requirement
is being actioned on an opportunity basis with each chart revision.

2.18.2 Geoid undulations are not published.

2.18.4 The order of resolution of coordinates is as specified (database archives); however, geoid undulations are
not implemented.

CHAPTER 3

3.2.1 The aerodrome operator supplies this chart as and when required.

CHAPTER 4

4.2.1* This chart is produced by the aerodrome operator as or when required.

CHAPTER 5

5.2 This chart is produced by the aerodrome operator as or when required.

CHAPTER 6

6.2 Remark: This chart is not required because no Australian aerodrome operates beyond ILS CAT I.

CHAPTER 7

7.9.3.1.1,2) The elevation of the transmitting antenna of the DME is contained in the Enroute Supplement Australia
Facilities (ERSA FAC).

9) Change-over points on route segments are not relevant to Australia.

11) Radio communications facilities listed with their frequencies are shown on the Enroute Chart Low
(ERC L), but the Enroute Chart High (ERC H) and the Terminal Area Chart (TAC) frequencies are
contained in the Enroute Supplement Australia (ERSA).

* Recommended Practice
2 AUSTRALIA SUPPLEMENTTO ANNEX^ (TENTHEDITION)

CHAPTER 8

8.6.2* This Recommendation would have very limited application in Australia and, consequently, does not
warrant introduction. At best, it would apply only to four aerodromes and then only by a small margin.
Alternative measures are in place to ensure that an equivalent level of safety is being achieved.

8.9.4.1.1,2) The elevation of the transmitting antenna of the DME is shown in ERSA.

CHAPTER 9

9.3.2* Australian SIDs are not drawn to scale.

9.9.4.1.1, 1) e) Minimum flight altitudes are not shown on SID routes or route segments.

2) d) Geographical coordinates are contained in the ERSA FAC.

2) e) DME elevation data is contained in the ERSA FAC.

5) Transition altitudeheight is not shown on SIDs.

CHAPTER 10

10.5.2 Australia does not have VORIDME RNAV procedures.

10.6.2* This Recommendation would have very limited application in Australia and, consequently, does not
warrant introduction. At best, it would apply only to four aerodromes and then only by a small margin.
Alternative measures are in place to ensure that an equivalent level of safety is being achieved.

10.9.4.1.1,2) a) The plain language name is in the title.

2) d) Geographical coordinates are contained in ERSA FAC.

2) e) The DME data is contained in ERSA FAC.

5) Transition altitudefheight is not shown on Australian STARS.

CHAPTER 11

11.7.3* This Recommendation would have very limited application in Australia and, consequently, does not
warrant introduction. At best, it would apply only to four-aerodromes and then only by a small margin.
Alternative measures are in place to ensure that an equivalent level of safety is being achieved.

11.10.4.3* Geographical coordinates, when shown, are indegrees, minutes and tenths of a minute. Australiadoes not
show geographical coordinates for the final approach fix.

11.10.6.4* Instrument Approach and Landing Chart (IAL) heights required by the procedures are underlined in lieu
of parentheses.

* Recommended Practice
11.10.6.5* This Recommendation has very limited application in Australia and does not warrant introduction.
Alternative measures are being introduced to ensure that an equivalent, or better, level of safety is being
achieved.

11.10.9 Data is held in an electronic database but is not published on the chart.

CHAPTER 12

12.2 Remark: Australia has no requirement for visual approach'charts.

CHAPTER 13

13.1 a) to d) Australian helicopter movement requirements for each international aerodrome are contained in
ERSA FAC.

13.6.1 a) Geographical coordinates are in degrees, minutes and tenths of minutes.

C) RWY end elevations only are shown.

d) Type of surface, bearing strengths, displaced thresholds and RWY markings are contained in ERSA.

j) The boundaries of the air traffic control service are not shown.

CHAPTER 14

14.2* Australia does not produce this chart.

CHAPTER 15

15.5.2* Magnetic variation to the nearest degree is shown but not the annual change.

15.6 b) Visual guidance docking systems are not shown.

C) All geographical coordinates are in degrees, minutes and tenths of minutes.

f) The boundaries of the air traffic control service are not shown.

g) Radio communications facilities are not displayed on Departure and Approach Procedures (DAP)
AD charts.

CHAPTER 16

16.4.6* Australian WACS follow the overlap criteria in critical areas of map coverage, but, in general, WAC
coverage ceases at the neat line.

* Recommended Practice
4 AUSTRALIA SUPPLEMENT
TO ANNEX4 (TENTHEDITION)

16.7.5 International boundaries are being progressively included on WACS.

16.7.9.3* Highest point spot elevations are not shown cleared of hypsometric tinting.

16.9.2.2 Aerodrome essential data is shown in ERSA FAC. Only the aerodrome type by symbol and its name are
shown on the chart.

16.9.3.1 Australian Rules and Practices for Aerodromes has a requirement under Chapter 10, Obstacles in
Airspace, clause 6.1, "Under regulation 89Y of Civil Aviation Regulation (CAR) 1988 the proponents of
structures in excess of 110 m above ground level to notify the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)
so that the effect of such proposals to aircraft operations can be assessed."

16.9.4 Prohibited, restricted and danger areas are not shown on WACS.

16.9.5 Elements of Australia's air traffic service system are not shown on WACS.

CHAPTER 17

17.4.4* The VNCs approximate, but are not quarter sheets of, the WAC coverage of the same areas. Required
coverage of VTCs makes such a recommendation impracticable.

17.4.5* Recommended overlaps are impracticabk for Australian coverage.

17.7.9.3* Highest point spot elevations are not shown cleared of hypsomerric tinting.

17.9.2.2 Aerodrome essential data is shown in ERSA FAC. Only the aerodrome type by symbol and its same are
shown on the chart.

CHAPTER f 8

18.2* Australia d ~ e not


s produce this chart.

CHAPTER 19

19.2* Australia does not produce this chart.

CHAPTER 20 Australia does not produce this chart. The provisions of Chapter 20 are essentially for FMS equipment
manufacturers and data base suppliers. These provisions are, therefore, out of the direct control of those
States that do not have these types of industries. Australia is one of these States.

* Recommended Practice

1711 1/03
CHAPTER 1

Instead of the definition "area minimum altitude (AMA)", the definition "minimum safe altitude (MSA)"
is used.

For each aerodrome, the MSA for instrument flight is established, which may be used in descent in
emergency situations when going beyond the limits of the approach procedure, and provides a minimum
vertical clearance of 300 m above the highest point of the terrain and artificial obstacles on it within a
radius of 50 km from the ARP.

If the difference in the altitudes of the terrain, taking into account the artificial obstacles on it, is not
more than 100 m, the MSA is established as being common to the whole terminal area. If there is a
greater difference in the altitudes, the terminal area is divided into sectors and an MSA is established for
each sector.

The altitude of the highest points of the t m i n and the artificial obstacles on it is determined in relation
to the level of the runway threshold in the approach direction and is rounded up to multiples of 10 m.

CHAPTER 2

2.1.8* The basic sheet size of the charts is 210 x 297 mm.

2.6.1 The name and basic parameters of the projection are not published.

2.14.1 The class of ATS airspace is not indicated.

2.18.1 The geographical coordinates indicating latitude and longitude are expressed in the 1942 system
of coordinates.

Information on the geoid undulation is not published.

CHAPTER 4

4.2.1* The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart - ICAO Type B is not published.

CHAPTER 5

The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart - ICAO Type C is not published.

CHAPTER 7

7.6.2 The area minimum altitudes are not indicated.

7.9.3.1.1, 1) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute.

2) The elevation of the transmitting antenna of the DME is not indicated.

* Recommended Practice
2 BELARUS SUPPLEMENTTO ANNEX4 (TENTHEDITION)

3) The class of airspace is not indicated.

4) The RNP type is not indicated.

5) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute.

6) The waypoints defining VOIUDME area navigation routes are not published.

9) The change-over points are not shown on charts.

CHAPTER 8

8.4.2 Parallels and meridians are not shown.

8.4.3 Graduation marks are not shown.

8.9.3 The area minimum altitudes are not indicated.

8.9.4.1.1, 1) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute.

2) The elevation of the transmitting antenna of the DME is not indicated.

4) The class of airspace is not indicated.

6) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minul.

7) The waypoints defining VOIUDME area navigation routes are not published.

10) The change-over points are not shown on charts.

CHAPTER 9

9.4.2" Parallels and meridians are not shown.

9.4.3 Graduation marks are not shown.

9.9.3 The area minimum altitudes are not indicated.

9.9.4.1.1,2) d) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute.

2) e) The elevation of the transmitting antenna of the DME is not indicated.

3) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute. The bearing from
the reference radio navigation aid is given with an accuracy to one degree.

* Recommended Practice

17111/03
SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX4 (TENTHEDITION) BELARUS 3

CHAPTER 10

10.4.2* Parallels and meridians are not shown.

10.4.3 Graduation marks are not shown.

10.9.3 The area minimum altitudes are not indicated.

10.9.4.1 .l, 2) d) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute.

2) e) The elevation of the transmitting antenna of the DME is not indicated.

3) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute. The bearing from
the reference radio navigation aid is given with an accuracy to one degree.

CHAPTER 11

11.3.3.1 The distance circle with a radius of 20 km centred on the DME or ARP is not shown.

11.5.2* Graduation marks are not shown.

11.10.2.6 The indication of the datum is not published.

11.10.4.3* The geographical coordinates of the final approach fix (or final approach point) are not indicated.

CHAPTER 12

12.2 The Visual Approach Chart - ICAO is not published.

CHAPTER 13

13.5 The annual change of the magnetic variation is not indicated.

13.6.1 a) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute.

C) Information on the geoid undulation is not published.

f) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute.

The geographical coordinates of aircraft stands are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute.
The geographical coordinates of taxiway centre line points are not published.

j) The boundaries of the air traffic control service are not indicated.

* Recommended Practice
4 BELARUS TO A m 4 (TENTHEDITION)
SUPPLEMENT

CHAPTER 14

14.3.2* The linear scale is not indicated.

14.5.2* The annual change of the magnetic variation is not indicated.

14.6 a) The apron elevation is not indicated.

C) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute.

f) The geographical coordinates of the taxiway centre line points are not published.

g) The boundaries of the air traffic control service are not published.

CHAPTER 15

15.3.2* The linear scale is not indicated.

15.5.2* The annual change of the magnetic variation is not indicated.

15.6 a) The apron elevation is not indicated.

c) The geographical coordinates are indicated in degrees, minutes and tenths of a minute.

e) The geographical coordinates of taxiway centre line points are not published.

f) The boundaries of the air traffic control service are not indicated.

CHAPTER 16

16.2.1 The World Aeronautical Chart - ICAO 1:I 000 000 is not published.

CHAPTER 17

17.2* The World Aeronautical Chart - ICAO 1500 000 is not published.

CHAPTER 18

18.2* The Aeronautical Navigation Chart - ICAO Small Scale is not published.

CHAPTER 19

19.2* The Plotting Chart -ICAO is not published.

* Recommended Practice

17111/03
SUPPLEMENTTO ANNEX 4 (TENTH EDITION) CANADAI

CHAPTER 2

2.2 The Area Chart (Annex 4, Chapter 8) is identified as the Terminal Area Chart.
The Aerodrome Ground Movement Chart (Annex 4, Chapter 14) is identified as the TAXI Chart.
The Aircraft ParkingtDocking Chart (Annex 4, Chapter 15) is identified as Parking Areas.

2.5.4 Linear dimensions are shown in feet.

2.5.7 A conversion scale (metrestfeet) is not provided for each chart on which elevations or altitudes are shown.

2.13 In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

2.18 Remark: Canada uses the North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83) as a geodetic reference datum. NAD 83
is equivalent to the World Geodetic System - 1984 (WGS-84) for aeronautical purposes.

CHAPTER 3

3.3.2 Linear dimensions are shown in feet, but there is no conversion scale to metres.

3.8.2.2 It is not proposed to include such information on the charts at this time. Should an operational
requirement for this information develop in the future, the implementation will be reported prior to
publication.

CHAPTER 4

4.2.1* The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart -ICAO Type B is not produced.

CHAPTER 5

5.2 The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart -ICAO Type C is not produced.

CHAPTER 6

6.2 The Precision Approach Terrain Chart -ICAO is not produced. However, "Terrain Profile View" are
provided on CAT 11 and 111Instrument Approach Charts.

CHAPTER 7

7.6.2 Area minimum altitudes are not published. However, geographic area safe altitude (GASA) is used,
which provides 2 000 feet of clearance, rounded up to the next higher 100-foot increment, over known
obstacles or terrain within the delineated geographic area. Implementation of AMA is expected by
18 April 2002.

7.9.2 In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

* Recommended Practice
2 CANADA SUPPEMENTTO ANNEX4 (TENTH
EDITION)

CHAPTER 8

8.9.2 In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

8.9.3 Area minimum altitudes are not published. However, geographic area safe altitude (GASA) is used, which
provides 2 000 feet of clearance, rounded up to the next higher 100-foot increment, over known obstacles
or terrain within the delineated geographic area. Implementation of AMA is expected by 18 April 2002.

8.9.4.1.1.2) Not shown.

Vertical or lateral limits are not indicated on Terminal Area Charts; however, they are referred to in the
sheet legend.

12) Not shown.


13)

CHAPTER 9

9.3.2* This chart is not drawn to scale.

9.9.2 In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

9.9.3.1 Minimum sector altitude is not published on the Standard Departure Chart. Minimum sector altitude is
published on the Instrument Approach Chart.

9.9.3.2 Area minimum altitude is not published on the Standard Departure Chart.

CHAPTER 10

10.3.2* This chart is not drawn to scale.

10.9.2 In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

10.9.3.1 Minimum sector altitude is not published on the Standard Arrival Chart. Minimum sector altitude is
published on the Instrument Approach Chart.

10.9.3.2 Area minimum altitude is not published on the Standard Arrival Chart.

CHAPTER 11

Implementation of relief and contours on instrument charts for aerodromes exceeding 4 000 ft above the
aerodrome elevation within the coverage of the chart or 2 000 ft within 6 N M of the aerodrome reference
point is expected by 18 April 2002.

In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

* Recommended Practice

17111/03
TOANNEX 4 (TENTH
SUPPLEMENT EDITION) CANADA3

11.10.6.1f ) Prohibited manoeuvring areas are indicated on the charts by an asterisk next to the circling minima with
an explanation that all circling should be to the north, south, east or west of the extended runway centre
line as applicable.

CHAPTER 12

12~10.3 In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

CHAPTER 13

13.6.1d) Bearing strengths are not published.

j) The boundaries of the air traffic control services are not shown on Aerodrome Charts.

Not shown on Aerodrome Chart. Indicated on Approach Chart.

CHAPTER 14

14.6 d) Bearing strengths are not published.

g) Boundaries of the air traffic control services are not shown.

CHAPTER 15

15.6 a) Apron elevation not shown.

f) Boundaries of the air traffic control services are not shown.

CHAPTER 16

16.5.1.1) The standard parallels for each 8" band are 1" 20" south of the northern parallel and 1" 20" north of the
southern parallel.

16.6 A sheet numbering system which differs from the index in Appendix 5 is used.

16.9.4 In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

CHAPTER 17

17.9.4 In Canada, restricted, danger and advisory areas apply.

CHAPTER 18

18.2* The Aeronautical Navigation Chart -ICAO Small Scale is not produced.

*Recommended Practice
CHAPTER 1

Runway-holding position. Chile defines it as the runway access holding position, in the same terms
as ICAO.

CHAPTER 2

2.17.3 The classification and data integrity level do not correspond to the level established which nevertheless
more than meets our requirements.

Chile has not published the geoid undulation, nor the order of resolution of geographical coordinates.

CHAPTER 3

3.9.1 The order of accuracy attained is not shown on the chart.

CHAPTER 5

5.1 The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart -ICAO Type C is not produced in Chile.

CHAPTER 9

Not shown.
Not shown. Note.- The prohibited, restricted and danger areas and the minimum sector altitudes are
shown on the ZAC.

CHAPTER 10

10.9.2 Not shown.

10.9.3 Not shown. Note.- The prohibited, restricted and danger areas and the minimum sector altitudes are
shown on the ZAC.

CHAPTER 11

1 1.7.2 Not shown on instrument approach charts.

CHAPTER 13

13.6.1 Not all specified information is shown on aerodromeheliport charts.


13.6.2
2 CHILE SUPPLEMENTTO ANNEX4 (TENTH
EDITION)

CHAPTER 16

16.2.1 Chile does not use the delineation of areas established in Appendix 5.

CHAPTER 17

17.2* Chile does not use the delineation of areas established in Appendix 5.

CHAPTER 20

20.1 The electronic aeronautical chart display is not used in Chile.

* Recommended Ractice

17111/03
SUPPLEMENT
TO ANNEX4 (TENTH EDITION) CHINA(HONGKONGSAR) I

CHAPTER 9

9.3.2* The chart is not drawn to scale. Work to achieve full coinpliance with the requirement is under way.

9.4 The format of the chart is based on a schematic diagram only. Work to achieve full compliance with the
requirement is under way.

9.9 Some aeronautical data is not indicated on the chart. Information is available in text. Work to achieve full
compliance with the requirement is under way.

CHAPTER 10

10.3.2* The chart is not drawn to scale. Work to achieve full compliance with the requirement is under way.

10.4 The format of the chart is based on a schematic diagram only. Work to achieve full compliance with the
requirement is under way.

Some aeronautical data is not indicated on the chart. Information is available in text. Work to achieve full
compliance with the requirement is under way.

CHAPTER 11

11.7 Topography is not indicated by the use of smoothed contour lines. Topography indicated by use of area
minimum altitude envelope. Work to achieve full compliance with the requirement is under way.

* Recommended Practice
SUPPLEMENT 4 (TENTH
TO ANNEX EDITION) COOKISLANDSI

CHAPTER 2

2.18.2 Geoid undulation is not published.

CHAPTER 4

4.2.1* Not implemented.

CHAPTER 5

5.2 Not implemented.

CHAPTER 7

7.6.2 Area minimum altitudes are not shown.

7.9.3.1.1,2) DME elevations are not shown on charts.

4) Remark: RNP airspace shown where applicable.

7.9.4.2 Not implemented.

CHAPTER 8
8.6.2* Not implemented.

8.9.3 Not implemented.

8.9.4.1.1,2) Not implemented.

CHAPTER 9

9.4.2* Parallels and meridians are not shown. The chart is orientated to true north and both true and magnetic
north are shown.

9.4.3 Graduation marks are not shown. Geographicalcoordinates are given for all navigation aids and reporting
points.

9.6.2* Not implemented.

9.9.4.1.1,2) e) DME elevations are not depicted on charts.

Transition altitude is not shown on the SID chart. All departure procedures published show altitudes. All
altitudes depicted are below the transition altitude (1 1 000 ft).

* Recommended Practice
2 COOKISLANDS SUPPLEMENT
TO ANNEX4 (TENTH
EDITION)

6) Not implemented.

9) c) Remark: Transponder codes are not specified for the SID procedure. There are no radar services available.

CHAPTER 10

10.4.2* Parallels and meridians are not shown. The chart is oriented to true north and both true and magnetic north
are shown.

10.6.2* Not implemented.

10.9.4.1.1,2) e) DME elevations are not depicted on charts.

5) Transition level is not shown on the STAR chart. All arrival procedures published show altitudes. All
altitudes depicted are below the transition level 0% 130).

8) C) Remark: Transponder codes are not specified. There are no radar services available.

CHAPTER 11

The scale of the chart is not shown.

Graduations are shown on the left and top neat lines only.

The categories of aircraft the procedures are authorized for are shown in the top centre of the chart.

Not implemented.

Remark: All obstacle heights are referenced to mean sea level.

Geographical coordinates are not shown for the final approach fix.

Not implemented.

A table of ground speeds and times from the final approach fix to the missed approach point is not given.

Descent angle shown as a percentage.

Not implemented.

CHAPTER 12

12.10.2.3* The heights of obstacles are not shown.

12.10.5.3 Not implemented.

* Recommended Practice

17111/03
SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX4 (TENTH
EDITION) COOKISLANDS3

CHAPTER 13

13.5 Annual rate of change of magnetic variation is not shown.

13.6.1 There is currently no provision for helicopter operations.

C) Geoid undulation is not published.

f) Not implemented.

13.6.2 There is currently no provision for helicopter operations.

CHAPTER 14

14.3.2* A scale bar is not shown.

14.5.2* The annual rate of change of magnetic variation is not shown.

14.6 a) Apron elevations are not shown.

f) Coordinates of taxiway centre line points are not shown.

* Recommended Practice
CHAPTER 2

2.5.7 Conversion scales are provided on charts where appropriate.

2.14.1 On German charts the horizontal limits of ATS airspaceare characterized by different colours (red, green,
blue) and not by different percentages of screen for the same colour as foreseen for airspaceclasses B to F.

CHAPTER 4

4.2.1* The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart -ICAO Type B is not published.

CHAPTER 7

7.6.2 The area minimum altitude (AMA) is not shown.

CHAPTER 8

8.2.1 The Area Chart -ICAO is not published.

CHAPTER 9

9.6.2* The relief is not shown.

9.9.3.2 The area minimum altitude is not shown.

9.9.4.1 .l, 2) e) The DME elevation of the transmitting antenna of the DME is not shown.

3) Bearings are shown to the nearest degree. Distances are shown to the nearest nautical mile.

CHAPTER 10

10.6.2* The relief is not shown.

10.9.3.2 The area minimum altitude is not shown.

10.9.4.1.1,2) e) The DME elevation of the transmitting antenna of the DME is not shown.

3) Bearings are shown to the nearest degree. Distances are shown to the neatest nautical mile.

CHAPTER 11

11.7.2 The relief is not shown.

* Recommended Practice
2 GERMANY TO ANNEX 4 (TENTH
SUPPLEMENT EDITION)

CHAPTER 12

12.10.5.3 Nominal approach slope angle(s) and minimum eye height@)are not shown in part.

CHAPTER 13

13.5 Annual change of the magnetic variation is not shown.

CHAPTER 14

14.5.2* Magnetic variation and its annual change are not shown.

14.6 d) Bearing strength of taxiways are not shown.

CHAPTER 15

15.5.2* Magnetic variation and its annual change are not shown.

15.6 a) Apron elevation is not shown.

b) Apron bearing strength is not shown.

CHAPTER 16

16.2.1 The World Aeronautical Chart -ICAO 1: 1 000 000 is not published.

CHAPTER 17

17.7.4* Prominent transmission lines are not shown.

17.7.7.1 Contours are not shown.

17.9.2.2 A modified version of aerodrome data in association with the aerodrome symbol is used.

CHAPTER 18

18.2* The Aeronautical Navigation Chart - ICAO Small Scale is not published.

Symbol 125 On German charts the horizontal limits of ATS airspace are characterized by different colors (red, green,
blue) and not by different percentages of screen for the same color as foreseen for airspace classes B to E

* Recommended Practice
Symbol 126 This symbol will not be used. The information block is too large and could mask other important chart
information.

Appendix 6

Table 1 Publication of taxiway centre line points and aircraft stand points according to the specified resolution
is not yet possible.

Table 2 WGS-84 geoid undulation at aerodromeheliportelevation position is not published.

Table 4 The chart resolution for en-route and terminal fix formations and instrument approach procedure fix
formations is 1 degree instead of 1/10 degree.

Table 5 The chart resolution for en-route fix formations distance and terminal and instrument approach procedure
fix formations distance is 1 degree instead of 1/10 degree.
TO ANNEX4 (TENTH
SUPPLEMENT EDITION) I
SWITZERLAND

CHAPTER 2

2.10.1 International boundaries are not shown on IAC, SIDlSTAR and Aerodrome Charts.

2.17.5 The protection of electronic data by the Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) will be fully implemented by
approximately the end of 2003 in conjunction with the European AIS Database (EAD).

CHAPTER 3

3.5.4 b) No box for recording amendments and dates available.

CHAPTER 4

4.2. l* The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart -ICAO Type B is not produced.

CHAPTER 5

5.2 The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart -ICAO Type C is not produced.

CHAPTER 8

8.2 The Area Chart -ICAO is not produced.

CHAPTER 9

9.4.3 Graduation marks are not shown.

9.6.1 Generalized shore lines are not shown.

9.9.4.1.1,2) b) Identifications are not shown.

2) d) Geographical coordinates are not shown.

3) The name-codes of the significant points, their geographical coordinates and the bearing from the
reference radio navigation aid are not shown.

The position and height of close-in obstacles which penetrate the obstacle identification surface (01s) are
not shown.

Radio communication procedures are not shown.

CHAPTER 10

10.4.3 Graduation marks are not shown.

* Recommended Practice
10.6.1 Generalized shore lines are not shown.

10.9.4.1.1,2)b) Identifications are not shown.

2 ) d) Geographical coordinates are not shown.

The namecodes of the significant points, their geographical coordinates and the bearing from the
reference radio navigation aid are not shown.

8) Radio communication procedures are not shown.

CHAPTER 11

11.6.3 The additional abbreviation "RNAV" is not published.

11.6.4 The additional abbreviation "RNAV" or "RNAV ,


,
,,
,
" is not published.

11.6.5 The abbreviation "'RNP"is not published.

11.7.1 Culture and topographic information are not shown.

11.7.2 The relief is not shown.

11.10.4.3* The final approach fix is not identified with its geographical coordinates.

CHAPTER 12

12.10.2.3.1 The obstacle heights are not given in parentheses on the chart.

12.10.5.3 Location and type of the visual approach slope indicator system with their nominal approach slope
angle(s), minimum eye height(s) over the threshold of the on-slope signal(s) are not shown on the charts
but on AD INFO sheets.

CHAPTER 13

13.6.1a) Geographical coordinates are not shown on the chart but on AD INFO, as far as available.

k) The positions of RVR observation sites are not shown.

m) Location and type of the visual approach slope indicator system with their nominal approach slope
angle(s), minimum eye height(s) over the threshold of the on-slope signal@)are not shown on the charts
but on AD INFO sheets.

* Recommended Practice

17111/03
SUPPLEMENTTO ANNEX 4 (TENTHEDITION) S W ~ R L A N D3

CHAPTER 14

14.6 b) The locations and types of visual docking guidance systems are not shown.

C) The geographical coordinates for aircraft stands are not shown on charts but in AD 2 § 2.8 .

f) The geographical coordinates for taxiway centre line points are not shown.

h) The frequencies of radio communication facilities are not shown.

k) The VOR checkpoints and radio frequencies are not shown.

CHAPTER 15

15.6 b) The locations and types of visual docking guidance systems are not shown.

C) The geographical coordinates for aircraft stands are not shown on charts but in AD 2 5 2.8.

e) The geographical coordinates for taxiway centre line points are not shown.

g) The frequencies of radio communication facilities are not shown.

j) The VOR checkpoints and radio frequencies are not shown.

CHAPTER 16

16.2.1 The World Aeronautical Chart -ICAO 1:1 000 000 is not produced.

CHAPTER 18

18.2* The Aeronautical Navigation Chart -ICAO Small Scale is not produced.

CHAPTER 19

19.2* The Plotting Chart -ICAO is not produced.

* Recommended Practice
SUPPLEMENT
TO ANNEX4 (TENTH
EDITION) UNITEDKINGDOMI

CHAPTER 1

1.2.2 Some charts produced do not conform to all relevant Standards. It is not possible to implement all the
Standards as published.

1.2.2.1* Some charts produced do not conform to all relevant Recommendations. It is not possible to implement
all the Recommendations as published.

CHAPTER 2

The basic sheet size is 279 mm x 210 mm. This allows more space to portray information.

Charts do not conform to all Standards and ICAO is used in the title. A variety of reasons exists as to why
Standards are not always conformed to.

Geiod undulation is not shown. This will be shown in due course.

CHAPTER 3

3.4.2 A scale of 1.20 000 is sometimes used. Allowed for in 3.4.3.

3.8.1.1 One-per cent slope used in place of 1.2 per cent. At 9 000 m from the point of origin, the surface plane
changes from a 1-per cent slope to horizontal. More stringent Standards applied.

3.8.1.2 For first 900 m of the take-off flight path area, the shadow planes are horizontal and beyond this point to
9 000 m such planes have an upward slope of one per cent. At 9 000 m the shadow plane reverts to
horizontal. A further safety factor is applied. Obstacles within the outer 25 m edges of the take-off path
area do not eliminateobstacles other than those found in the 25-mzone. More stringentStandardsapplied.

3.8.2.1 b) The width at the point of origin is 180 m and this increases at a rate of 0.25D to a maximum of 3 930 m,
where D is the distance from the point of origin. More stringent Standards applied.

3.8.2.2 The take-off flight path area specified in 3.8.2.1 c) remains at 15 km.The slope of the plane surface shall
remain as specified in 3 .8.1.1 and 3.8.1.2. More stringent Standards applied.

3.9.1 Order of accuracy attained is not shown unless it is excessive.

CHAPTER 4

4.2.1* Remark: Chart not produced. No obligation to produce. Information published in the AIP.

CHAPTER 5

5.2 Remark: Chart not produced. No obligation to produce. Information published in the AIP.

*Recommended Practice
2 UNITED
KINGDOM TO ANNEX4 (TENTH
SUPPLEMENT EDITION)

CHAPTER 7

7.2.1 Chart not produced. Information published in the AIP. Deemed to be adequate, military and commercially
produced civilian charts available to fulfil requirement.

CHAPTER 8

8.2.1 Chart not produced. Information published in the AIP.

CHAPTER 9

9.3.2* Charts are not drawn to scale. Impossible to use a suitable scale that also allows for clarity.

9.3.3 No scale shown. Charts are not drawn to scale.

9.4.2* Not shown. Not applicable, charts not drawn to scale.

9.4.3 Not shown. Not applicable, charts not drawn to scale.

9.6.1 Topography and culture not shown. Not applicable, charts not drawn to scale.

9.6.2* Topography and culture not shown. Not applicable, charts not drawn to scale.

9.7 Magnetic variation not shown. Will implement when possible.

9.9.2 Prohibited, restricted and danger areas are not shown. To reduce clutter.

9.9.4.1.1, 1) e) Minimum flight altitudes along the route or route segments are not shown. To reduce clutter.

2) e) Elevation and channel of the DME is not shown. Consider them not to be required. Frequencyof the DME
is shown.

3) Bearings are shown to the nearest degree and distance to nearest nautical mile. To increase clarity.

6) Terrain information is not shown. To reduce clutter.

9.9.4.2* Communication failure procedure is not shown. To reduce clutter.

CHAPTER 10

10.3.2* Charts are not drawn to scale. Impossible to use a suitable scale that also allows for clarity.

10.3.3 Not shown. Not applicable, charts not drawn to scale.

10.4.1* Projection not shown. Not applicable, charts not drawn to scale.

10.4.2* Parallels and meridians not shown. Not applicable, charts not drawn to scale.

* Recommended Practice

17111/03
10.6.2* Cultural and topographicalfeatures not shown. Not applicable, charts not drawn to scale. Reduces clutter.
Terrain information is not shown. To reduce clutter.

10.7 Magnetic variation is not shown. Will implement in due course.

10.9.2 Prohibited, restricted and danger areas are not shown. Reduces clutter.

10.9.4.1.1,2) e) Elevation and channel of the DMEis not shown. Consider them not tobe required. Frequency of the DME
is shown.

3) Bearings are shown to the nearest degree and distance to nearest nautical mile. To increase clarity.

10.9.4.2* Communication failure procedure is not shown. Reduces clutter.

CHAPTER 11

11.2.4 Chart is not separated by aircraft category. Not required current charts do not cause clutter or confusion.

11.3.3.1 A distance circle with a radius of 10 N M is centred on the aerodrome reference point. Considered not to
be practical to implement.

Distance scale only shown if a chart has no DME associated with the procedure. No requirement.

Sheet size is 297 x 210 mm.Allows more room to display procedure.

Aircraft categories are not shown in parenthesis to indicate limitations of procedure. Different format used
to indicate permitted aircraft.

Chart shows contour intervals of 300 ft with the fast interval being at 300 ft above aerodrome elevation
rounded down to the nearest 50 ft. Best suited to the United Kingdom area.

Magnetic variation shown only for non-VOR procedures. Set value of VOR could be different from local
magnetic variation.

Only those aerodromes deemed to affect the procedure are portrayed on the chart. To reduce clutter.

Obstacles determining an obstacle clearance altituddheight is not identified. Will investigate possibility
of implementing.

Only the AMSL height of an obstacle is shown. Reduces clutter.

An obstacle free zone is not described. Will investigate possibility of implementing.

The FAFIFAF' geographical coordinates are not shown. Will investigate possibility of implementing.

Only radio communication frequencies are shown, not call signs. Reduces clutter.

Transition altitude is situated above the plan view, not within the profile area. Reduces clutter.

* Recommended Practice
11.10.6.5* The ground profile depicts the highest elevations of relief occurring along the extended runway centre
line. Will investigate possibility of implementing.

11.10.7.1 Aerodrome operating minima is not shown for all aerodromes. No minima for smaller aerodromes.

11.10.9 Associated instrument approach procedure data is not shown. Will investigate possibility of
implementing.

CHAPTER 12

12.2 Remark: Not produced. Not required. See Doc 8697 -Aeronautical Chan Nanual, Chapter 2,2.5.1.

CHAPTER 13

13.5 Annual change of magnetic variation is not shown. Charts are updated regularly with changes in variation.

13.6.1 c) Geoid undulation and highest elevation of the touchdown zone of a precision approach is not shown. Will
investigate possibility of implementing.

d) Runway bearing strengths not shown. Cleanvays and runway markings are not shown. Information
published in the AP.

Apron lighting, markings and other visual guidance and control aids, including docking systems and
bearing strengths not shown. Details in the AP.

Geographical coordinates not shown. Details in the AP.

Taxiway surface, width and bearing strengths not shown. Details in the AIP.

Routes for taxiing aircraft and designators not shown.

Heliport type is not shown. Will investigate possibility of implementing.

TLOF slope and bearing strength not shown. Will investigate possibility of implementing.

True bearing not shown, magnetic bearing is shown to the nearest degree. Slope not shown. Will
investigate possibility of implementing.

Clearway not shown. Will investigate possibility of implementing.

Declared distances are not shown. Will investigate possibility of implementing.

CHAPTER 14

14.2* Remark: Chart is not produced in the United Kingdom. Information available on Aerodrome Chart.

*Recommended Practice

17111103
CHAPTER 15

15.5.2* Annual change of magnetic variation is not shown. Charts re-issued on regular basis, hence no
requirement.

15.6 b) Apron lighting, markings and other visual guidance and control aids, including docking systems and
bearing strengths not shown. Shown in AIP.

Geographical coordinates not shown. Shown in AIP.

CHAPTER 16

16.2.1 Not produced in the United Kingdom. Scale too small for use in the United Kingdom.

CHAPTER 17

17.3.2 A conversion scale is not shown. Removed due to lack of space but is shown on a separate legend card.

17.4.3* All charts are sold flat. Customer requirement.

17.4.4* The 1: 1 000 000 chart is not produced. Not applicable.

17.7.11* Escarpments are not shown. Information not available.

17.9.2.2 Lighting available is not shown apart from aerodrome light beacons. Surface and length of longest runway
are not shown. Reduces clutter.

ADIZ not applicable in the United Kingdom. No requirement.

CHAPTER 18

18.2* Not produced. No operational requirement.

CHAPTER 19

19.2* Not produced. No operational requirement.

CHAPTER 20

20.2.1 Chart not produced in the United Kingdom. As yet no requirement.

* Recommended Practice
CHAPTER 3

3.2.1 The Aerodrome Obstacle Charts - Types A, B and C continue to be rescheduled due to the final
measurements that were being made this year on obstacles and the number of changes that were made in
each AMDT. They are being rescheduled for the end of 2003.

CHAPTER 4

4.2.1* The Aerodrome Obstacle Charts - Types A, B and C continue to be rescheduled due to the final
measurements that were being made this year on obstacles and the number of changes that were made in
each AMDT. They are being rescheduled for the end of 2003.

CHAPTER 5

The Aerodrome Obstacle Charts - Types A, B and C continue to be rescheduled due to the final
measurements that were being made this year on obstacles and the number of changes that were made in
each AMDT. They are being rescheduled for the end of 2003.

CHAPTER 7

7.9.3.1.1,12) Air defense identification zones (ADIZ) have not yet been defined.

CHAPTER 16 There is no compliance with the coverage of the chart specified in Appendix 5.

CHAPTER 17 No chart with this scale is published.

CHAPTER 20 The Aeronautical Charts Task Force is working on this aspect and is defining the format of the file of the
chart to be displayed. Consideration thereof has not yet been finalized since this will have to be agreed
with the users. In any case, the existence of the symbols is very important prior to resolving this matter.

*Recommended Practice
SUPPLEMENTTOANNEX4 (TENTHEDITION) UZBEKISTANI

CHAPTER 1

1.3.1 Only information necessary for flight safety is provided for overflight of Uzbek temtory.

CHAPTER 2

2.6.1 The name and basic parameters of the projection are not published.

CHAPTER 4

4.2.1 * The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart -ICAO Type B is not published.

CHAPTER 5

5.2 The Aerodrome Obstacle Chart -ICAO Type C is not published.

CHAPTER 7

7.9.2 Prohibited, restricted and danger areas are not published on the Enroute Chart -ICAO.

7.9.3.1.1,6) Waypoints defining VORIDME area navigation routes are not published.

CHAPTER 8

8.9.1 Aerodromes published in AIP Uzbekistan are indicated on the Area Chart -ICAO.

8.9.2 Prohibited, restricted and danger areas are not published on the Area Chart - ICAO.

CHAPTER 9

9.9.1.2 Aerodromes published in AIP Uzbekistan are indicated on the Standard Departure Chart - Instrument
(SID) -ICAO.

9.9.2 Prohibited, restricted and danger areas are not published on the Standard Departure Chart- Instrument
(SID) - ICAO.

CHAPTER 10

10.9.1.2 Aerodromes published in AIP Uzbekistan are indicated on the Standard Arrival Chart - Instrument
(STAR) -ICAO.

10.9.2 Prohibited, restricted and danger areas are not published on the Standard Amval Chart - Instrument
(STAR) -ICAO.

* Recommended Practice
2 UZBE~TAN SUPPLEMENT TO ANNEX4 (TENTH EDITION)

CHAPTER 11

11.10.1.1 Aerodromes published in AIP Uzbekistan are indicated on the Instrument Approach Chart - ICAO.

11.10.3 Prohibited, restricted and danger areas are not published on the Instrument Approach Chart -ICAO.

11.10.8.6 The height of the ILS reference datum is not indicated on the Instrument Approach Chart -ICAO.

CHAPTER 14

14.6 c) The geographical coordinates for aircraft stands are not usually published on the Aerodrome Ground
Movement Chart -ICAO.

CHAPTER 15

15.6~) The geographicalcoordinates for aircraft stands are not usually published on the Aircraft ParkinglDocking
Chart -ICAO.

CHAPTER 16

16.2.1 The World Aeronautical Chart -ICAO 1:1 000 000 is not published.

CHAPTER 17

17.2* The World Aeronautical Chart -ICAO 1:500 000 is not published.

CHAPTER 19

19.2* The Plotting Chart - ICAO is not published.

* Recommended Practice

17111/03

Вам также может понравиться