Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 123

A GRADUATE TRACER STUDY OF NURSING IN UPHSL BATCH 2015

An Undergraduate Thesis Presented


To the Faculty of the College of Nursing
University of Perpetual Help
System Laguna

In partial
Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the degree
Bachelor of Science in Nursing

By:
Canindo, Kertz Ehman A.
Dimaguila, Mia Noryani B.
Sakamoto, Maria Beatriz R.
Sicat, Minette E.
Sigue, Renz Ann A.
Susa, Jessica Wezen B.
Torres, Jean Elyssa P.
Villaluz, Jhon Christian R.

June 2018
RECOMMENDATION FOR ORAL EXAMINATION

This undergraduate thesis entitled “A GRADUATE TRACER STUDY


OF NURSING IN UPHSL BATCH 2015” prepared and submitted by
Canindo, Kertz Ehman A., Dimaguila, Mia Noryani B., Sakamoto, Maria
Beatriz R., Sicat, Minette E., Sigue, Renz Ann A., Susa, Jessica Wezen B.,
Torres, Jean Elyssa P., Villaluz, Jhon Christian R., in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree Bachelor of Science in Nursing has been
examined and hereby recommended for acceptance and approval for ORAL
EXAMINATION.

_______________________________
Reuben C. Peralta RN, MBA, MAN
Adviser
_____________________________________________________________

APPROVAL BY THE PANEL OF EXAMINERS

Approved by the committee on Oral Examinations with a grade

of___________________________________.

________________________________
Dean Estrella A. San Juan RN, MAN, PhD
Chairman

___________________________ ___________________________
Lazaro E. Avelino, EdD Ma. Xenia Z. Bitera, RN, MAN

Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for


the degree Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

______________ ________________________________
Date Dean Estrella A. San Juan RN, MAN, PhD

ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The accomplishment of this research paper could have not been

possible without the encouragement and guidance of the people whom the

researchers are highly grateful for:

To Ms. Estrella A. San Juan, RN, MAN, PhD, Dean of the College of

Nursing, for giving the researchers the opportunity to have this

overwhelming experience, for permitting them to conduct this study and for

the persistent help and guidance.

To Mr. Reuben C. Peralta, RN, MBA, MAN, their beloved research

adviser, for relentlessly guiding the researchers with compassion,

understanding, inexhaustible supervision, meticulous modifications, and

continuous support for the improvement of the study.

To Mrs. Ma. Xenia Z. Bitera, RN, MAN, for the untiring supervision,

persistent support and thorough revisions for the improvement of their

research output.

To Mr. Leonardo J. Elemos, MAEd, for being their statistician and

for providing his time and effort in sharing his knowledge and expertise in his

chosen profession.

To Ms. Precy Lantin, RN, MAN, Mrs. Lizcir Panelo, RN, MAN, and

Mrs. Evelyn Del Rosario, RN, MAN, for validating their questionnaire and

iii
citing suggestions and recommendations in improving it for the betterment of

the study.

To the respondents, for their support and participation, for reliably

sharing their thoughts, knowledge and experiences, and in offering their

precious time in answering the questionnaire of this study.

To the parents of the researchers, for their unconditional love,

endless emotional and financial support, supervision, assistance, and

understanding.

And above all, to Almighty God, who bestowed them with such

intellect, determination and good health that they need in finishing this

study.

K.E.A.C.
M.N.B.D.
M.B.R.S.
M.E.S.
R.A.A.S.
J.W.B.S.
J.E.P.T.
J.C.R.V

iv
ABSTRACT

Title : A GRADUATE TRACER STUDY OF NURSING IN


UPHSL BATCH 2015

Authors : Canindo, Kertz Ehman A., Dimaguila, Mia Noryani


B., Sakamoto, Maria Beatriz R., Sicat, Minette E.,
Sigue, Renz Ann A., Susa, Jessica Wezen B.,
Torres, Jean Elyssa P., Villaluz, Jhon Christian R.

Degree : Bachelor of Science in Nursing

School : UPH – Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University

Academic Year : 2017 – 2018

Adviser : Reuben C. Peralta, RN, MBA, MAN

Number of Pages : 122

This study was designed to serve as the graduate tracer study of


nursing graduates in UPHSL batch 2015.
Specifically, the study based into the respondents’ college experience
in terms of learner engagement, teaching quality, student support services,
and their overall college experience; nursing licensure examination in terms
of the results of NP1, NP2, NP3, NP4, and NP5; and employability based on
employment history.
The study utilized the descriptive-correlation method using
convenience sampling with the total sample respondents of 32. Data were
obtained through a questionnaire among the graduates of Bachelor of
Science in Nursing batch 2015. Descriptive method was used to determine
the college experience, nursing licensure examination, and employability of
graduates while correlational method was used to determine if the college
experience of nursing graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 have significant
relationship with their nursing licensure examination, if the college
experience of nursing graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 have significant
relationship with their employment, if the nursing licensure examination
results have significant relationship with their employment.
The summary of findings of the college experience of nursing
graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of learner engagement was
moderate with an average weighted mean of 2.29; in terms of teaching
quality was always with an average weighted mean of 2.66; in terms of
v
student support services was sometimes with an average weighted mean of
2.17; and in terms of overall college experience, the respondents had agree
with an average weighted mean of 2.83.
The nursing licensure examination ratings of nursing graduates of
UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of test subject NP 1 had most of the
respondents, 18 (66.67%) have a good nursing licensure examination with
an average within the range of 78-81 while 1 (3.70%) have an excellent
nursing licensure examination with an average within the range of 88 and
above; in terms of test subject NP 2 had most of the respondents, 15
(55.56%) have a good nursing licensure examination with an average within
the range of 78-81 while 1 (3.70%) have a very good nursing licensure
examination with an average within the range of 82-87; in terms of test
subject NP 3 had most of the respondents, 9 (33.33%) have a failed nursing
licensure examination with an average within the range of 74 and below
while 4 (14.81%) have a very good nursing licensure examination with an
average within the range of 82-87; in terms of test subject NP 4 had most of
the respondents, 13 (48.15%) have a good nursing licensure examination
with an average within the range of 78-81 while the other respondents got
88 and above and the other got 82-87 of average, both have equal
percentage of (3.70%) and have an excellent and very good nursing
licensure examination; in terms of test subject NP 5 had most of the
respondents, 21 (77.78%) have a failed nursing licensure examination with
an average within the range of 74 and below while 2 (7.41%) have a good
nursing licensure examination with an average within the range of 78-81.
The respondents’ employment profile in terms of employment history
was within 4 months to 9 months with an average weighted mean of 1.87.
The relationship between College Experience in terms of learner
engagement and nursing licensure examination of nursing practice 1, 2, 3, 4
and 5 has been confirmed through the computed value of Pearson r values of
-0.28, -0.14, -0.26, -0.21, -0.28 were respectively acquired, which were
lower than 0.38 tabular value at the degree of freedom equivalent to 25 and
interpreted as weak relationship. Finding the for its significance, computed t
values of -1.48, -0.73, -1.33, -1.10, -1.45 respectively were obtained, which
were lower than 2.060 critical value at 0.05 level of significance and
indicated as not significant. Null hypothesis will be accepted.
The relationship between College Experience in terms of teaching
qualities and nursing licensure examination of nursing practice 1, 2, 3, 4 and
5 has been confirmed through the computed value of Pearson r values of -
0.11, -0.15, -0.10, -0.15, -0.01 were respectively acquired, which were
lower than 0.38 tabular value at the degree of freedom equivalent to 25 and
interpreted as very weak relationship. Finding the for its significance,
computed t values of -0.55, -0.75, 0.52, 0.74, -0.04 respectively were
obtained, which were lower than 2.060 critical value at 0.05 level of
significance and indicated as not significant. Null hypothesis will be accepted.

vi
The relationship between college experience in terms of student
support service and nursing licensure examination of nursing practice 1, 2, 3,
4 and 5 has been confirmed through the computed value of Pearson r values
of 0.00, -0.10, -0.19, -0.07, -0.31 were respectively acquired, which were
lower than 0.38 tabular value at the degree of freedom equivalent to 25 and
interpreted as very weak relationship. Finding the for its significance,
computed t values of -0.01, -0.51, -0.95, -0.33, -1.64 respectively were
obtained, which were lower than 2.060 critical value at 0.05 level of
significance and indicated as not significant. Null hypothesis will be accepted.
The relationship between college experience in terms of overall college
experience and nursing licensure examination of nursing practice 1, 2, 3, 4
and 5 has been confirmed through the computed value of Pearson r values of
-0.08, 0.00, -0.14, -0.05, -0.02 were respectively acquired, which were
lower than 0.38 tabular value at the degree of freedom equivalent to 25 and
interpreted as very weak relationship. Finding the for its significance,
computed t values of -0.40, 0.01, -0.63, -0.26, -1.09 respectively were
obtained, which were lower than 2.060 critical value at 0.05 level of
significance and indicated as not significant. Null hypothesis will be accepted.
The computed Pearson r in college experience in terms of learner
engagement, teaching quality, student support system and overall college
experience between employability status were obtained respectively with a
Pearson r values of -0.10, 0.13, -0.07, -0.28 were less than the tabular value
of 0.38 and were interpreted as very weak in relation. To find for its
significance computed t values of -0.49, 0.64, -0.35, -1.44 were acquired
respectively, results were lower than the critical value of 2.060 and were
interpreted as not significant. Null hypothesis will be accepted.
The relationship between the respondents’ nursing licensure
examination of nursing practice 1, 2, 3, 4 to their employability status shows
very weak relationship excepting nursing practice 5 which shows moderate
relationship. The computed Pearson r values of 0.09, 0.02, 0.25, 0.10 were
respectively obtained for nursing practice 1, 2, 3, and 4 while a Pearson r
value of 0.41 for nursing practice 5. The significant results were acquired
respectively through the computed t values of 0.48, 0.08, 1.28, 0.52 for
nursing practice 1, 2, 3, and 4 while for nursing practice 5 has obtained a t
value of 2.27 which were interpreted as not significant excepting nursing
practice 5 that was interpreted as significant.
Based on the findings of the study, the researchers concluded that the
College Experience of nursing graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of
Learner engagement was experienced moderate; teaching quality was
experienced as always; student support service was experienced as
sometimes; and overall college experience as agreed.
Majority of the nursing graduates in UPHSL batch 2015 had a good
result in nursing licensure exam although there were 5 respondents who did
not take the NLE.

vii
The respondent’s employment profile in terms of its employability
history was within 4 months to 9 months, therefore, respondents seek their
desired jobs as soon as they graduate.
College experience has no significance to the Nursing Licensure
Examination results of nursing graduates in UPHSL batch 2015. College
experience of nursing graduates in UPHSL is independent and has no
influence to their employment. Nursing Licensure Examination results of
nursing graduates in UPHSL batch 2015 has a no influence to their
employment except for NP5.
Based on conclusions, the researchers recommend that the College of
Nursing should conduct activities that will improve the relationship among
nursing students. The students should continuously be molded with the help
of their clinical instructors, the weak points should be strengthened and
given emphasis and their strengths should be continuously practiced for the
betterment of their college experience. The student support services must
provide the best way to utilize or maximize the resources available to deliver
a more accommodating and conducive place for students to learn. Also, the
students should learn more from a vast collection of knowledge, and should
not depend on the general knowledge that they’ve learned. The previous
nursing licensure examination questions should be discussed frequently in
class and incorporated in long examinations of the nursing students to serve
as their review. Furthermore, the students should learn how to market
themselves with the support of seminars that can enhance their confidence
and capabilities. Nursing students must show interest and must act on their
outmost performance as possible. Lastly, the future researchers of the same
study should engage themselves in conducting and tracing the previous
graduates in efficient and effective manner for them to achieve a very
satisfactory result.

viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE i

APPROVAL SHEET ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii

ABSTRACT v

TABLE OF CONTENTS ix

LIST OF TABLES xi

LIST OF FIGURES xiv

Chapter

1. THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND 1

Introduction 1

Theoretical Framework 4

Conceptual Paradigm 5

Statement of the Problem 6

Hypothesis 7

Assumptions 8

Scope and Delimitation 8

Definition of Terms 9

2. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES 12

State-of-the-art 12

Related Literature 12
ix
Related Study 20

Synthesis of the State of the Art 28

Gaps to be bridged by the study 30

3. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 31

Research Design 31

Sources of Data 32

Population of the Study 32

Evaluation and Scoring 33

Instrumentation and Validation 35

Data Gathering Procedure 36

Statistical Treatment of Data 37

4. PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA 40

5. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 74

Summary 75

Conclusions 80

Recommendations 81

BIBLIOGRAPHY 83

APPENDICES A 88

APPENDICES B 94

CURRICULUM VITAE 101

x
LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

1 Rating Scale for the Interpretation of College Experience in 33

terms of Learner Engagement

2 Rating Scale for the Interpretation of College Experience in 34

terms of Learner Engagement, Teaching Quality, and

Student Support Services

3 Rating Scale for the Interpretation of College Experience 35

in terms of Overall College Experience

4 Weighted Mean and Ranking of the College Experience of 40

Nursing Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of

Learner Engagement

5 Weighted Mean and Ranking of the College Experience of 41

Nursing Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of

Learner Engagement

6 Weighted Mean and Ranking of the College Experience of 43

Nursing Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of

Learner Engagement

7 Weighted Mean and Ranking of the College Experience of 45

Nursing Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of

Teaching Quality

xi
8 Weighted Mean and Ranking of the College Experience of 46

Nursing Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of

Student Support Services

9 Weighted Mean and Ranking of the College Experience of 48

Nursing Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of Overall

College Experience

10 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of NLE Performance 49

of UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 Test Subject (NP1)

11 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of NLE Performance 50

of UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 Test Subject (NP2)

12 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of NLE Performance 51

of UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 Test Subject (NP3)

13 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of NLE Performance 52

of UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 Test Subject (NP4)

14 Frequency and Percentage Distribution of NLE Performance 52

of UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 Test Subject (NP5)

15 Weighted Mean and Ranking of the Respondent’s 53

Employment Profile in terms of Employment History

16 Relationship between the College Experience in terms of 55

Learner Engagement and Nursing Licensure Examination of

the UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 according to

Five Subject Classifications of Nursing Practice

17 Relationship between the College Experience in terms of 58


xii
Teaching Quality and Nursing Licensure Examination of the

UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 according to Five

Subject Classifications of Nursing Practice

18 Relationship between the College Experience in terms of 61

Student Support Services and Nursing Licensure Examination

of the UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 according

to Five Subject Classifications of Nursing Practice

19 Relationship between the College Experience in terms of 65

Overall College Experience and Nursing Licensure

Examination of the UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch

2015 according to Five Subject Classifications of Nursing Practice

20 Relationship between the Respondent’s College Experience 68

to their Employment

21 Relationship between Nursing Licensure Examination 70

and their Employment

xiii
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

1 The Interplay of the Independent Variables and Dependent 5

Variables on the Employability of Graduates of UPHSL

xiv
1

Chapter 1

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction

The graduates are the ultimate products of higher education

institution. They move in every part of the world to showcase their

knowledge and exhibit competencies and be involved in the development of

every nation of different races and of different system of health sector with

one common goal of illness prevention and promoting quality healthcare.

Nowadays, Filipino nurses are globally in high demand because of the

standardized and unified curriculum on Bachelor of Science in Nursing since

the year 2005. This globalized demand leads to mushrooming of nursing

schools thereby reduces the excellent standard possible in producing the best

nurses all over the world not just in theoretical foundations as well as their

progressive and competent skills.

Hospitals need new graduate nurses and are generally motivated to

spend money to train them because the long term projection of retaining a

nurse is better financially than having nursing turnover or to hire contract

nurses. To ensure this, some hospitals may require a one or two-year

contract upon hire. Hospitals and other healthcare facilities realize the

demand for nurses will increase over the next decade. Steady reasons for

growth in nursing jobs include the fact that Americans are growing older and
2

gaining new medical coverage which creates a demand for nurses, as well as

nursing turnover (Androus, Lee & Spano, 2016).

The demand for nurses is gradually increasing; not just the quantity is

in need but also requires the need for the quality of care that the nurses

give. The need for man power in terms of nurses being in the field is crucial

and viral now than ever. Clinical practices are no doubt a common issue

especially for health care facilities seeking for quality performances coming

from their employees. But because of increase in under pressure to operate

in a lean, less efficient and less effective manner of performances, increased

regulatory oversight and increased in consumerism, the quality of registered

nurses is on its downfall. With this at hand the employability of some

registered nurses are questioned if it is worth the need of most health care

facilities.

Unemployment is one of the problems that the Philippines face today.

The unemployment rate of the Philippines in the year 2012 was 7.20% which

is one of the highest among the Asian countries in the last five years

(Gonzales, 2013). Unemployed Filipino nurses are estimated to be 187,000

(Howard, 2010). However, according to number of respondents were

employed (70.48% of 229 respondents) which means that even if

unemployment of nurses is increasing, there are still job placements

available. Salary, benefits, incentives and reward are important factors in

nursing employment (De Mesa, Del Rosario, Delgado, Desepeda &


3

Dimaunahan, 2009). Recent graduates or nurses who have not practiced

after graduation may have limited ideas of job opportunities. Their choice of

the 1st job may be strongly influenced by their education, achievement level,

geographical preference, salary, and peer pressure. They are likely to take

several jobs before settling down. The dissatisfied employees are often not

actively seeking other employment but likely to be receptive to new opening

or job offers (Tomey, 2015) this study assessed the bachelor of science in

nursing program, learning experiences, employment status and

achievements of nursing graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 to determine the

needs for improvement on educational services and curriculum.

The purpose of this study is to provide reliable information about the

employability status of Bachelor in Science of Nursing Batch 2015 graduates,

and to determine what has happened to the former learners of the university

whether they went on to pursue further education and training or promoted

on the basis of their qualifications obtained from university. It also aimed to

help nursing students to discover the quality of the curriculum, adequacy of

school facilities and academic excellence of UPHSL in preparing the nursing

students for the job opportunities that are waiting ahead.


4

Theoretical Framework

The theory of Leonard Evangelista pertaining to employability is

enough to support the speculations of the researchers of this study. This

theory states that employability is the value of the person to the labor

market in relation to a specific occupation. It depends on the relationship

between the supply and demand for that occupation, the unchangeable

personal factors such as age, gender, physique, health, personality,

belonging to a particular group which attracts government incentives for

employees, and the changeable personal factors such as knowledge and

technical ability, flexibility and looking after oneself.

The researchers chose this theory to exploit its relevance in helping

students improve academic competence, develop employability skills,

implement a career plan and participate in a career pathway in preparation

for post-secondary education or careers in the nursing field. The theory

served as a guide for the researchers to base their study and acts as a

source of information for readers.


5

Conceptual Paradigm

The conceptual paradigm of the factors that may influence the

employability status of the batch 2015 nursing graduates of UPHSL.

Independent Variable Dependent Variable

NLE
 NP 1
 NP 2
 NP 3
 NP 4
College Experience  NP 5
 Learner engagement
 Teaching quality
 Student support services
 Overall college experience

Employment
 Employability history

Figure 1. The Interplay of the Independent Variables and Dependent


Variables on the Employability of Graduates of UPHSL

The independent variable of the study is the college experience of the

nursing graduates in terms of learner engagement, teaching quality, student

support services, and overall college experience correlated with Nursing

Licensure Exam in terms of NP1, NP2, NP3, NP4, and NP5 and employment
6

of Batch 2015 graduates of Bachelor of Science in Nursing in terms of

employment history.

Statement of the Problem

This study aimed to determine the college experience, nursing

licensure examination, and employment history of nursing graduates of

University of Perpetual Help – Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University of

batch 2015.

Specifically, this seeks to answer the following questions:

1. What is the college experience of UPHSL BS Nursing graduates of batch

2015 in terms of:

1.1 Learner engagement

1.2 Teaching quality

1.3 Student support service

1.4 Overall college experience

2. What are the ratings of the respondents in Nursing Licensure Examination

in terms of:

2.1 NP 1

2.2 NP 2

2.3 NP 3

2.4 NP 4

2.5 NP 5

3. What is the respondents’ employment profile in terms of:


7

3.1 Employability history

4. Is there a significant relationship between the college experiences of the

UPHSL BSN graduates of batch 2015 to NLE?

5. Is there a significant relationship between the respondents’ college

experience to their employment?

6. Is there a significant relationship between the respondents’ NLE to their

employment?

Hypothesis

• H01: There is no significant relationship between the college

experiences of the UPHSL BS Nursing graduates of 2015 to NLE.

• H11: There is a significant relationship between the college

experiences of the UPHSL BS Nursing graduates of 2015 to NLE.

• H02: There is no significant relationship between the college

experience of the respondents to the employment.

• H12: There is a significant relationship between the college experience

of the respondents to the employment.

• H03: There is no significant relationship between the NLE of the

respondents to their employment.

• H13: There is a significant relationship between the NLE of the

respondents to their employment.


8

Assumptions

1. College experience molds the students to become more competent on

becoming an employed individual.

2. Nursing licensure examination tests the nursing students if he/she is

qualified for the level of competency of an employee.

3. Employment in nursing field is widely promoted in the Philippines and in

other countries.

Scope and Delimitation

This tracer study extends to the graduates of Bachelor of Science in

nursing course of University of Perpetual Help – Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical

University of Academic Year 2015. The researchers delimit the areas being

concerned for every graduate as follows; college experiences, nursing

licensure examination and their current employment status. The focus of the

investigation was centered on the contentions of tracing the graduates’

employment and on whether their acquired skills and competencies during

their college and nursing licensure examination were a significant and

relevant to their occupation upon employment. The study was anchored on

these aspects of employment status of the graduate through the quality

education they received from their college using the parameters such as:

institutional facilities, hands-on training for students, updated books and


9

reference materials, instructors/faculty, curriculum and availability and

access to internet.

Definition of Terms

The following terminologies listed below are operationally defined for

better understanding of this graduate tracer study. These terms are being

defined on how they are used in the study.

Tracer Study is a standard survey of graduates from higher

education institutions, which take place sometime after graduation, usually

two years. They are a means of following graduates to find out what they

with the education and training they received.

Experience – skill or knowledge that you get by doing something.

College experience – composed of learner engagement, teaching

quality, student support services, overall college experience.

Learner – a person who is trying to gain knowledge or skill in

something by studying, practicing, or being taught.

Related learning experience – is teaching learning opportunities

design to develop the competencies of students utilizing process in various

health situations

Teaching quality – provides all learners with capabilities they require

to become economically productive, develop sustainable livelihoods,


10

contribute to peaceful and democratic societies and enhance individual well-

being.

Support – is to sustain (a person, the mind, spirits, courage, etc.)

under trial or affliction.

Student support services – professionals provide direct services for

all children and youth, especially those who are experiencing problems that

create barriers to learning such as education, counselling, consultation and

individual assessment.

Overall college experience – students’ experiences in college that

helped them apply their learnings into real life situations.

Employment - a contract in which one person, the employee, agrees

to perform work, service or task for another person, the employer, with or

without remuneration although, as with all contracts at common law, some

forms of consideration must flow. A state when someone is being hired base

on his/her ability and knowledge for a certain job.

Status- an individual’s position held in regard to the rest of the

community and not by an act of law or by the consensual acts of the parties.

Employment status- refers to whether an employee is holding a

permanent, temporary, provisional, contractual or casual position.

Nursing licensure examination- in Philippines- it is a 500-item

multiple choice exam to test the basic nursing level competency which

considers the objectives of the nursing curriculum, the broad areas of


11

nursing and other related disciplines and competencies. A graduate of BS

nursing needs to take the Nursing Licensure Examination (NLE) and pass the

exam before he/ she can practice the profession.


12

Chapter 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

This chapter presents the literature and studies found and gathered by

the researchers to have a bearing in one way or another to this current

study. This chapter will also present the synthesis of the art, theoretical and

conceptual framework to help the readers to fully understand the

comprehensiveness of the study.

State-of-the-art

The researchers made use of related literature and related studies

together with some important data. The primary and secondary data were

from books, journals, and through the use of online references and other

published theses as long as the data are relevant to the study conducted.

Related Literature

A Tracer Study is done to follow up graduates of higher education or

institutions. Its aim is to evaluate one’s progress from graduation up to the

time he or she gets a job. This study assesses the quality of graduates and is

developed to answer the change in industry and corporate world by


13

integrating the higher education institutions with labor market. A tracer

study is a form of development of longitudinal study. Through a tracer study,

an institution is able to evaluate the quality of education given to their

graduates by knowing the graduates’ placements and position in society

which later can be used as benchmark in producing more qualified and

competitive graduates (Schomburg, 2011).

College experience is a remarkable thing to happen for students. Not

only it compensates to the need of a learner to continue to develop but it

also enhances each individual to further grow on their relationship towards

their profession. Those experiences are adopted and are used for the skills

demanded for their upcoming work as professionals. With that being said,

experience is not to be reckoned with because not only it affects the

student’s mental and physical state but also molds the individual to become

what they intended to be that will suit to their profession. Depending on how

the student will be influenced could lead to any desired outcomes

(Tomlinson, 2003).

On recent years, nursing education has been focusing on theoretical

education to give them the opportunity to distribute the learning. Students

start with classroom-based lectures where they first learn what they are

going to demonstrate when they are already in a simulation area. Student

preceptors let the student nurses to practice on a replica of a human being


14

or to their classmates to prepare them when they are exposed to clinical

area.

One of the most critical and challenging yet fulfilling college

experiences that student nurses go through is clinical exposure. This is

where they encounter the real world of nursing. Learning in clinical practice

provides a significant help in learning for students taking Bachelor of Science

in Nursing because this is where the sense of responsibility for the health

and well-being of others is introduce and developed. Chan (2009) accounts

that among student nurses, the clinical nursing environment is perceived as

the most influential context for gaining nursing skills and knowledge. Clinical

experience has been always an integrated part of nursing education for

student nurses. It prepares the students to learn the clinical principles and to

encounter the accidental learning during clinical exposure which will help in

developing their critical thinking and skills.

Recent studies conducted by Bangbade (2004) found out that

professors’ attribute have significant relationship with the academic

performance of students. Such attributes include professor’s knowledge of

the subject matter, communication ability, emotional stability, good human

relationship and interest in the job. This is in support of the present study’s

findings which show that professor-related factors were deemed to be the

most impactful category of factors that pose an impact on student nurses’

academic performance. Rena (2000) further explained that for students to


15

perform well in examination one of the prerequisites is that their professors

must know they have profound knowledge of their state of physical,

intellectual and psychological readiness.

Academic program integrity is meant quality in nursing educations.

Higher education is delivered via program or courses leading to academic or

professional awards, with each program having a nursing educator’s team for

operational management. Good curriculum criteria should be related to

present and anticipated future needs, aims and objectives which are explicit

and focused (Awad, 2015).

The study results could help initiating change in the faculty staff

regarding the teaching process, teaching methods, clinical practice, clinical

settings and student’s evaluation. Also could help to establish mutual and

defined expectations among the students and faculty administrators and

academic staff, which could help to create a healthy academic atmosphere

conductive to learning (Ismail, Aboushady & Eswi, 2016).

Review studies show that student’s engagement makes a difference in

student outcomes adjustment to school, retention, involving the

development of cognitive and intellectual skills and life-long learning. There

was significant mean difference in the examination scores between of the

two groups (structured group discussions and purely didactic) of students in

medical-surgical nursing courses in an experimental study. Transferring

knowledge and the effectiveness of clinical teaching-learning strategies lies


16

in facilitating student engagement through promoting a diversity of

experiences, creating shared learning opportunities, maximizing students-

faculty interaction, involving student-faculty interaction, involving students in

active learning and settings high experiences. There is a positive of

collaborative learning, blended learning, shared-learning experiences and

technologies for improving the engagement or students and develop of

capabilities. Learner reported increased engagement in self-directed clinical

learning activities like e-learning and web based learning for developing

critical reasoning process and impact that learning was more dynamic and

active compared to the learning experienced in the conventional curriculum.

Graduates’ performance in licensure examination and their

employability are key performance indicators in quality assurance (Dangan,

2015). Attaining a high percentage in the licensure exams is unquestionably

commendable because it serves as an important basis for the success of its

graduates and their ability to apply their skills and knowledge in the working

world. According to the Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation

[CLEAR] (2000), the licensure examination is one of the last hurdles that a

candidate must face in the licensing process. A board has the ultimate

responsibility to ensure that the examination meets technical, professional,

and legal standards, and, protects the health, safety and welfare of the

public by assessing candidates’ abilities to practice competently. Once a

candidate has passed a licensing examination, the board must be


17

comfortable granting the license, thus assuring the public that the licensee is

minimally qualified to practice at the time of initial licensure.

Republic Act No. 9173, states that the policy of the State to assume

responsibility for the protection and improvement of the nursing profession

by instituting measures that will result in relevant nursing education,

humane working conditions, better career prospects and a dignified existence

for our nurses; and there should be a board that will supervise and regulate

the practice of nursing profession. The Philippine Nursing Licensure

Examination is a 500-item multiple choice exam to test basic nursing level

competency which considers the objectives of the nursing curriculum, the

broad areas of nursing and other related disciplines and competencies. It is

held every July and November annually in various testing centers throughout

the Philippines. Room assignment for the exams are posted outside the

Professional Regulation Commission building at least three days before the

exam.

The test plan is a scope of the topics that will be covered by the NLE.

Nursing practice 1 is composed of Theories, concepts, principles and

processes basic to the practice of nursing with emphasis on health promotion

and health maintenance. It includes basic nursing skills in the care of clients

across age groups in any setting. Moreover, it encompasses the varied roles,

functions and responsibilities of the professional nurse in varied health care

settings. Nursing Practice 2 is composed of Theories, concepts, principles and


18

processes in the care of individuals, families, groups and communities to

promote health and prevent illness, and alleviate pain and discomfort,

utilizing the nursing process as framework. This includes care of high risk

and at-risk mothers, children and families during the various stages of life

cycle. Part 1 of Nursing Practice 2 is about Community Health Nursing (CHN)

and Part 2 of NP2 is composed of questions about Maternal and Child Nursing

(MCN). Nursing Practice 3, 4 and 5 is focusing on Theories, concepts,

principles and processes in the care of clients with altered health patterns,

utilizing the nursing process and integrating the key areas of nursing

competencies. Test 3 is about Client in Pain, Perioperative Care, and

Alterations in Human Functioning (Disturbances in Oxygenation, Metabolic

and Endocrine Functioning, Elimination). Test 4 is about disturbance in Fluids

and Electrolytes, Inflammatory and Infectious Disturbances, Immunologic

Functioning, Disturbances in Cellular Functioning, Client in Biologic Crisis,

Emergency and Disaster Nursing. Test 5 is about Disturbances in Perception

and coordination, Psychiatric Nursing, Communication, Collaboration &

Teamwork, Rights of patient, Management of Resources, Environment and

Record Management (Vera, 2013).

Employment is the ability of an individual to showcase to the selected

field of industry the skills, knowledge and training they acquired in a specific

program, Thomas Powers on his book “Educating for Careers” stated the
19

notion that marketable skills provided today’s crop of worker’s employment

opportunities.

The factors influencing the nurses to be employed in other countries is

linked to increased and improved opportunities in which it includes the

following: higher salaries, better working conditions and enhanced capacity

for career advancement. Increasingly, an important deciding factor is the

opportunity for them and their families to work and live in a safer and more

economically prosperous environment as permanent residence (Blake,

2010).

In recruiting to specific graduate-level jobs, employers are looking for

graduates and diplomats who possess high-level skills, knowledge and

appropriate personal attributes, and who can ‘grow’ the job or help transform

the organization. In some employment situations, the application of subject-

specific expertise is vitally important whereas in others it is not (Brown,

Cueto & Fee, 2006).

Most graduates of medical and allied courses aim to work abroad and

usually stay for a few years just enough to gain experience and boost their

chances of overseas employments yet even if there are more graduates than

new jobs available here in the country, the country experiences shortage of

health professionals, especially in the provinces (Cruz & Nuqui, 2014).


20

Related Studies

Understanding the experience of nursing students in critical care

course will help nurse managers, clinical nurse educators, and nurses

appropriately support and facilitate nursing education. It is important to give

organizers of planned clinical education suggestions and solutions especially

about the critical care unit’s placement rotation. It is improving for

collaboration between academia and clinical services in term of providing

efficient and much experience of students related to clinical objectives and

tasks. (M. Ahmad, Alasad, Tabar & H. Ahmad, 2015)

Based on the study conducted by Zysberg (2008), nursing students'

expectations of college have not received much attention in the empirical

literature. These expectations may be important in better understanding

nurses' motivations, role acquisition, and academic and professional success.

The first study discussed in this article examined the reliability and construct

validity of an instrument designed to assess students' (N = 95) expectations

of their college experience. The results indicate good reliability and validity.

The second study discussed in this article examined differences in

expectations, comparing nursing and non-nursing students (N = 160) in an

urban college setting. The results suggest expectations emphasizing practical

and professional aspects (i.e., acquiring a profession, earning more money),

followed by self-betterment and social life expectations. Nursing students

differed from non-nursing students by reporting higher self-betterment and


21

professional expectations but lower academic expectations. Implications for

application and further research are discussed.

The finding in a study showed that important conditions for nursing

student’s learning experiences and motivation in their clinical studies

included individual, relational, and organizational aspects. Clinical studies

constitute a major part of the bachelor program in nursing and,

consequently, the quality of these studies is a crucial factor for the students

to develop into competent professional nurses. To clarify the student’s

competence level and learning outcomes, as well as the students and

supervisor’s mutual expectations, responsibility, and roles, seems to be

decisive for the student’s opportunities for personal and professional learning

and growth. Feeling welcomed, included, and valued in the ward improves

the student’s motivation, self-confidence and self-respects. In addition, the

quality of the student-supervisor relationship and the supervisors

pedagogical and professional’s competences are highly emphasized (B. Dale,

Leland & J. Dale, 2013).

Chen & Hu (2008), stated that the concept of job-hunting is an

important factor affecting university students’ employment. In their empirical

study it showed that while hunting for a job, graduates witness negative

correlation between their expectation of the nature of work and the demand

for occupational types and accessibility to a post and monthly income;

positive correlation between students’ initiative and employment


22

opportunities; positive correlation between salary expectation and real

income; negative correlation between mental preparation for hardship and

job satisfaction. They emphasized that the institutions of higher learning

must strengthen their employment education, guiding students to foster a

sound sense of competition, the concept of occupational position, mental

preparation for vocational hardship so that students can rectify their attitude

towards employment and adjust their employment concept, thus benefiting

them in gaining a position.

The number of the nurses who are registered overcame the foretold

population of workforce peaking from 2.7 million instead of 2.2 million in

2012. The increase and decrease of the number of RN workforce is sensitive

changes in retirement age given that there are numerous baby-boomer RNs

in the workforce of health care sector. In the period 1991-2012 it is said to

be showing 74% of RN age 62 and there is 24% of RN age 69 and is

extending their careers by an average of 2.5 years in RN workforce. RNs

tend to shift out of the hospital by age, employers of different sector of

nonhospital roles are opening a way for them which is ever growing and fast

pacing at the past years.

As cited by American Association of College of Nursing (2013), nursing

graduates of baccalaureate degree and masters’ degree program have the

highest peak of employability and marketability rate in health care

sector/industry soon after graduation and passing the board exam. A


23

National survey of deans and directors from U.S. Nursing schools showed

that 59% of new BSN graduates and have a wide range of job opportunities

at the time of graduation which has a high difference across all professions

(29.3%). It is substantialized that four to six months post-graduation 89%

of new BSN graduates have implied to be more secured in terms of

employability.

As stated by Esguerra (2008), there is a large quantity of qualified

employees in the Philippines than there are sufficient employment

opportunities. The high employment and underemployment that plagued the

country that made citizens from all fields and education levels to hunt job

overseas. Under the “Philippine 2000” program, the goal is to create

sufficient employment opportunities within the country by the year 2000.

According to Philippine Normal University [PNU] (2014), PNU

graduates are predominantly females and in their early twenties; that they

enrolled at PNU due of affordable tuition fee and the personal prestige

attached to the name-for better employment and career advancement. A

large quantity of graduates was employed without political influence. Having

provided adequately with skills, knowledge and technical, communication,

human relations, leadership, research, problem solving, and other

competencies specific to the area of specialization were major factors on top

of area of specialization and reputation of PNU considered for immediate job

acquisition. About 93 % of graduates claimed that after 2-4 months after


24

graduation, majority were able to get a nursing job. The respondents have

been working as nurses and are occupying key positions in their own

workplace. Most are hired in private hospitals. Most respondents are working

as nurses in countries like the US, Canada, Australia, Middle East, New

Zealand, and other Asian countries like Singapore and Philippines. Some of

the graduates are designated as supervisors, head nurses or charge nurses

in their respective field of specialization. Majority are connected with private

hospitals within and outside the country. Some of our alumni had received

commendations and awards for exemplary performance in the workplace or

in the nursing organizations that they are currently affiliated (American

International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2014).

Unemployed Filipino nurses are calculated to be approximate 187,000

(Howard, 2010). Yet, according to the study “professional Achievements of

the Nursing Graduates of Lyceum of the Philippines University 2006-2008”,

most number of BSN graduates were employed (70.48% of 229

respondents) which means that even if unemployment of nurses is

increasing, there are still job placement available. Salary, benefits,

incentives, and rewards are important factors in nursing employment (De

Mesa, Del Rosario, Delgado, Desepeda & Dimaunahan, 2009). Regardless of

increase in economic growth in the first quarter of 2010, there was an

increase in the unemployed Filipinos from 2.80 million to 3.10 million. Based

on the national statistics office, this was equal to 8% unemployment rate.


25

Metro Manila had the highest unemployment rate. It had a percentage of

11.80%. at the meantime, Zamboanga peninsula got the lowest which was

3.10%. 52% of Filipinos were in the service sector while 19.40% were in

wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles, and

personal and household goods. 32.5% were in agriculture and 15.50% were

in industry sector. 21.7 million were full-time workers while 13 million were

part time workers (Domingo, 2010), however, there was an increase in the

employment level by 3.20% in 2011. Meanwhile, self-employment rate is still

1.20%. There was a decrease in unemployment rate at 7.00% compared to

7.40% last 2010. This shows that there was a positive development in the

employment status in the Philippines (Lee, 2012).

As cited by the Week Staff (2011), the primary and secondary years of

college provide almost half of the students with limited learning. Statistics

shows 55% of the students are not learning during their first and secondary

years in college due to lack of providing time allotment in studying instead,

they waste their time in socializing, while the instructors are teaching to

become a good student. Getting a college education is significant. Quality

education should be the goal of every university instead of just producing

more graduates.

Lorma Colleges College of Nursing (2012), found that graduates were

mostly of the year 2010 and some are alumni of the years 2006 to 2009.
26

Most of them are female single individuals belonging to the age bracket 20-

24 and reside in La Union.

In terms of the employment status, the graduates enjoy their career

as professional nurses, although others decided to join other professions like

caregiving, teaching, and government employees.

It is implied in this study that there are more qualified employees in

the Philippines than there are adequate employment opportunities. The high

employment and underemployment that plague the country have lead

citizens from all fields and education levels to seek employment abroad. This

may be an obstacle to finding the best candidate in the Philippines (Esguerra,

2008).

They are mostly employed in the province of La Union, others opted to

stay in nearby towns and provinces for sensible reasons and convenience,

while some have migrated abroad. The respondents served their employers

for 1-2 years while others are working in less than a year. Majority of the

graduates are earning more than PhP 10,000 a month whereas few with less

than PhP 10,000 monthly. They were successful in seeking for employment

after 1-2 years but there are 66 or 12.87% who were able to hunt for work

after 3-4 years and 61 or 11.89% in less than a year. Along relevance of

training provided by Lorma Colleges, College of Nursing, majority of the

respondents provided favorable feedback relative to the curriculum and

Related Learning Experiences. The study concluded that the graduates of the
27

Bachelor of Science in Nursing of Lorma Colleges are young, enthusiastic,

and spirited practitioners in the nursing profession and other fields of

practice. They are working and affiliated with prestigious health agencies and

holding positions relevant to the field of nursing. Others are likewise

successful practitioners in renowned countries abroad like the United States,

Canada, and others. Lorma Colleges provided responsive curriculum and

related learning experiences, which were useful and contributed to the

success and productivity of the graduates in the practice of their profession.

Study shows more than 200,000 students who graduated 2007-that

large numbers of graduate are going into nursing or social work, while far

fewer are starting careers in banks. Yet, the study conducted also disclosed

that far more graduates are getting jobs in more secure health care

professions showing 43.7 per cent increase in those going into nursing since

2004. The number of students beginning careers in social work has increased

by almost a third. (Beckford, 2008)

According to Rydon (2007), on his research study, showed evidence

for informed discussion pertaining to issues around curriculum development

arose, particularly those issues that affect employment success of graduates.

89.8 % of graduates in his study were successful in gaining employment in

the first three months post registration. On his research study on issues that

affect employment success of graduates, the majority of graduates felt that

their nursing education prepared them well for their role as a registered
28

nurse. The findings of the data identified a strong need for science

throughout the degree; longer clinical block; increased hands on experience;

more practice with skills and less theory in relation to practical experience.

As elucidated by Alam (2010) factors influencing to be employed are

the financial and job related factors found. Parent, peer influence and work

experience are some other factors and It was analyzed by the two groups

who had the highest explanatory power differentiated. Student’s perception

of benefits and cost interrelated with a career.

Synthesis of the State of the Art

According to Chan (2009), Week Staff (2011), Rydon (2007), Zysberg

(2008), and Lorma Colleges, College of Nursing, the graduates’ college

experience is perceived as the most influential context for gaining nursing

skills and knowledge but the quality of these studies is a crucial factor for the

students to develop into competent professional nurses. Majority of nursing

graduates felt that their nursing education prepared them well for their role

as a registered nurse. The nursing education prepares the students to learn

the clinical principles and to encounter the accidental learning during clinical

exposure which will help in developing their critical thinking and skills.

Bangbade (2004), B. Dale, Leland & J. Dale (2013), Rena (2000) stated that

professors’ attributes influence the academic performance of students. Such

attributes include professor’s knowledge of the subject matter,


29

communication ability, emotional stability, good human relationship and

interest in the job. the quality of the student-professor relationship affects

the students’ physical, intellectual and psychological aspects. Feeling

welcomed, included, and valued in the area improves the student’s

motivation, self-confidence and self-respects.

According to Dangan (2015), Council on Licensure, Enforcement and

Regulation [CLEAR] (2000), Republic Act No. 9173, the licensure

examination is one of the last hurdles that a candidate must face in the

licensing process. A board has the ultimate responsibility to ensure that the

examination meets technical, professional, and legal standards, and, protects

the health, safety and welfare of the public by assessing candidates’ abilities

to practice competently. It is the graduates’ key performance indicator

because it serves as an important basis of their ability to apply their skills

and knowledge in the working world.

Brown, Cueto & Fee (2006), Chen & Hu (2008), and Philippine Normal

University [PNU] (2014) stated that in recruiting to specific graduate-level

jobs, employers are looking for graduates and diplomats who possess high-

level skills, knowledge and appropriate personal attributes, and who can

‘grow’ the job or help transform the organization. They emphasized that the

institutions of higher learning must strengthen their employment education,

so that the graduates will have a sound sense of competition, thus benefiting

them in gaining a position. In some employment situations, the application of


30

subject-specific expertise was major factors on top of area of specialization

and considered for immediate job acquisition. According to Esguerra (2008)

and Cruz & Nuqui (2014), there is a large quantity of graduates in the

country than there are sufficient employment opportunities. So most nursing

graduates aim to work abroad and usually stay for a few years just enough

to gain experience and boost their chances of overseas employments. Blake

(2010) and De Mesa, et al. (2009) stated that higher salaries, better working

conditions and enhanced capacity for career advancement are the factors

influencing the nurses to be employed because there is an increased and

improved opportunities for them and their families to work and live in a safer

and more economically prosperous environment as permanent residence.

Gaps Bridged by the Present Study

Nursing graduates’ employability and its related factors are the things

that are affected especially when it comes to discussing contributory factors

as delineated by various authors from the previous literatures and studies.

However, the present study focuses mainly on the employment of nursing

graduates in UPHSL batch 2015 to determine what happened to them after

they graduated on their tertiary level. It also concentrates on other aspects

which are the college experience and nursing licensure examination results of

the nursing graduates where there had only little information about its

influence on being employed.


31

Chapter 3

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

This chapter is a presentation of the methodology of research,

research design, sources of data, population of the study, instrumentation

and validation, data gathering procedure, and statistical treatment of data. It

allows the readers to find out how the study was conducted.

Research Design

This study used a descriptive-correlation type of research design.

Descriptive research involves the description, recording, analysis and

interpretation of the present nature, composition or processes of phenomena

which focuses on prevailing conditions, or how a person, group or thing

behaves or functions in the present. It often involves some type of

comparison or contrast. In other words, descriptive research maybe defined

as a purposive process of gathering, analyzing, classifying and tabulating

data about prevailing conditions, practices, beliefs, processes, trends and

cause effect relationships and then making adequate and accurate

interpretation about such data with or without the aid of statistical methods

(Calderon, 2012). With regards to correlational research, Richard Lomax

stated that it aims to determine the relations among two or more variables,
32

and after those important variables have been identified, the relations

among those variables are investigated.

This study is a tracer study that investigates graduates who had left

the institution after completing the course or field of specialization. It is

concerned with what has happened to them and what has been the impact

upon that institution and its program.

Sources of Data

The data and information in this study were obtained from primary

and secondary sources. In collecting the primary data, the researchers

constructed questionnaires and administered them through email to the

respondents. While journals, books, online references, dissertation and thesis

related to the study were used to obtain the secondary data.

Population of the Study

The Bachelor of Science in Nursing graduates of the University of

Perpetual Help- Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University from academic year

2015 totaling forty-two (42) comprised the research population. A total of

thirty-two (32) respondents composed the research sample. Personal data

such as names, addresses and telephone/cellular phone numbers of the

graduates of batch 2015 were obtained from their undergraduate thesis’


33

index- curriculum vitae. The researchers administered some of the

questionnaires via email to the graduate – respondents. The researchers also

asked for the help and assistance of friends of the graduates from the time

of data gathering to the identified respondents. It was the most convenient

and fastest way of sending notes, letters and messages. Most of graduate

respondents use computers which meant that it was easier to communicate

with them to solicit their participation in the study.

Evaluation and Scoring

Rating scale was used to interpret college experience of nursing

graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of learner engagement, teaching

quality, student support services, and overall college experience.

Interpretation differs for each sub variable in line with the CHED’s Graduate

Tracer Study 2014 Individual Questionnaire which was modified to fit the

study.

Table 1. Rating Scale for the Interpretation of


College Experience in terms of
Learner Engagement

Rating scale Interpretation


2.50 – 3.50 High
1.50 – 2.50 Moderate

0.50 – 1.50 Low


34

Table 1 shows rating scales that was used for the interpretation of

college experience UPHSL nursing graduates of batch 2015 in terms of

learner engagement unto which interpretations high, moderate and low,

were used to answer the questions that are asking for the extent.

Table 2. Rating Scale for the Interpretation of


College Experience in terms of Learner
Engagement, Teaching Quality, and
Student Support Services
Rating scale Interpretation

2.50 – 3.50 Always

1.50 – 2.50 Sometimes

0.50 – 1.50 Never

Table 2 shows the rating scale with its corresponding interpretation for

the evaluation of the college experience of respondents in terms of learner

engagement, teaching quality, and student support services. Interpretations

always, sometimes and never, were used to answer the questions for the

extent, regularity and availability of services provided.


35

Table 3. Rating Scale for the Interpretation of


College Experience in terms of Overall
College Experience

Rating scale Interpretation

2.50 – 3.50 Agree

1.50 – 2.50 Undecided

0.50 – 1.50 Disagree

Table 3 shows the rating scales with its corresponding interpretation of

the overall college experience of the respondents. Interpretations agree,

undecided and disagree, were used to answer questions that are asking for

the helpfulness of the other sub variables in completion of the said

experience.

Instrumentation and Validation

The researchers used a questionnaire method to gather the data which

uses questionnaire to collect quantitative information about items in the

population that generally aims to provide data describing the condition,

opinions, and perceptions of the respondents.

Respondents were asked to answer each problem by putting a check

mark as they applied to themselves personally. It was based on the

questionnaire provided by CHED for tracer study. Minor revisions were done
36

to the original questionnaire to meet the objectives of the present study. The

instrument was used on the presumption that respondents are literate,

clearly motivated and willing to participate. The researchers made use of

survey/ questionnaires for (1) it is less expensive, requiring less skill to

administer and could be administered to a large number of respondents

simultaneously, (2)it ensures some amount of uniformity from one

measurement situation to another because of its standardized wording, order

of questions and instructions for recording responses, (3) in completing

questionnaires, respondents have confidence in their anonymity so that they

will be free to express their views; and (4) it exerts less pressure on the

respondents to provide immediate response.

Data Gathering procedure


The researchers made use of convenience sampling. Convenience

sampling is a process of picking out people in the most convenient way to

immediately get their reaction to a certain hot and controversial issue.

Sampling was done by:

1. Getting a list of the total population or universe;

2. Calling, texting or emailing randomly, those from the list with contact

information. In cases where respondents are unavailable or unwilling

to cooperate, others were chosen using the same procedure, repeating

the process until ample responses are collected.


37

Statistical Treatment of Data

The data collected were tabulated and encoded for analysis. The

following statistical tools were employed in interpreting the data obtained

from the survey: percentage was used to analyze the profile of the

respondents with respect to the selected variables; weighted mean was used

to determine the degree of the graduate respondents in the school factors

related to their job placement and rank was utilized to show the position of

importance of the items used.

A. Descriptive statistics

The following statistics were used for the problem:

A Frequency Distribution organizes and presents grouped data. This

was used to determine the nursing licensure examination of nursing

graduates of UPHSL.

Percentage describes how a part related to its while percentage was

used in the formula, to analyze the profile of the respondents with respect to

the selected variables It was used to determine the passing range rate of the

UPHSL BS nursing graduates of the batch 2015.

Formula:

𝑛
𝑃= 𝑥 100
𝑁
38

Where: P= Percentage

n= Size of the portion

N= Population Size

Weighted mean is used since the option to the questionnaires were

assigned to points, this was used to determine the college experience of the

Nursing graduates of UPHSL in terms of engagement, teaching quality,

student support services, and overall college experience. This was also used

to determine the employability of the nursing graduates of UPHSL that works

as professional nurses. It is measured by the formula:

Ʃ𝒇𝒙
𝑾𝑴 =
𝑵

Where: f – frequency

X – assigned weight

N – Total number of observations

Ranking was used to determine the positional importance of item

discussed, arranging the magnitudes from highest to lowest.

B. Inferential statistics

1.) Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (Pearson r) – the most

common statistical tool in measuring the linear relationship between the

two random variables x and y. This was used to measure the strength of

the relationship between the college experience, employability as well as

the nursing licensure examination ratings of nursing graduates of UPHSL.

a. To compute for the Pearson r, u se the formula:


39

𝑁Ʃ𝑥𝑦 − Ʃ𝑥Ʃ𝑦
𝑟=
√[𝑁Ʃ𝑥 2 − (Ʃ𝑥)2 ][𝑁Ʃ𝑦 2 − (Ʃ𝑦)2 ]

Where: r= Correlation Coefficient

N= Population Size

x= Independent Variable

y= Dependent Variable

b. Level of Significance: 5% = 0.05

c. Degree of Freedom

df = N – 2

Where: N = total number of respondents

2.) t-test – this was used to test the significance of Pearson r. this was also

used to determine if the college experience and nursing licensure

examination have a significant relationship to the employability of nursing

graduates of UPHSL.

a. To compute for t-test, use the formula:

𝑑𝑓
𝑡=𝑟√
1 − 𝑟2

Where: t= t- test/ t-distribution

r = Pearson r

df = degree of freedom

b. Level of significance: 5%=0.05

c. Degree of freedom df = N-2

Where: N= total of number of respondents


40

Chapter 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter summarizes the collected data and the statistical

treatment applied to them. This shows the tabular presentation of the

consolidated findings of the study, the interpretation and analysis of the

information presented as it relates to the study.

Table 4. Weighted Mean & Ranking of the College Experience of Nursing


Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of Learner Engagement
Learner Engagement

1. During your college Weighted Interpretation Rank


years, to what extent
have you… Mean

a. Had a sense of 2.41 Moderate 1


belongingness to your
university?
b. Felt prepared for your 2.16 Moderate 2
study?
Average Weighted Mean 2.29 Moderate

Table 4 shows the College Experience of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL

batch 2015 in terms of Learner Engagement. Indicator 1.A. “To what extent

have you had a sense of belongingness to your university?” obtained the

largest weighted mean of 2.41, was ranked 1st and was interpreted as

Moderate. While indicator 1.B. “To what extent have you felt prepared for
41

your study?” obtained the lowest weighted mean of 2.16, which was ranked

2nd and was interpreted as Moderate. Overall, the College Experience of

Nursing Graduates of UPHSL in terms of Learner Engagement was Moderate

with an average weighted mean of 2.29.

Result showed that the nursing graduates of UPHSL had moderately

experienced belongingness and felt prepared for their study inside the

university. The results also showed that all the listed indicators of learner

engagement were moderately experienced by the nursing graduates.

This indicates that the nursing graduates of UPHSL had been prepared

for their study and felt belonged to the university.

Table 5. Weighted Mean & Ranking of the College Experience of Nursing


Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of Learner Engagement
Learner Engagement

2. During that time, how Weighted Mean Interpretation Rank


frequent have you…
a. Participated in 2.22 Sometimes 4
discussions online or face to
face?
b. Worked with other 2.62 Always 1
students as a part of your
study?
c. Interacted with students 2.53 Always 2
outside your study
requirements?
d. Interacted with students 2.31 Sometimes 3
who were very different
from you?
Average Weighted Mean 2.42 Sometimes
42

Table 5 shows the College Experience of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL

batch 2015 in terms of Learner Engagement. Indicator 2.B. “How frequent

have you worked with other student as a part of your study?” obtained the

largest weighted mean of 2.62, was ranked 1st and was interpreted as

Always. While indicator 2.A. “How frequent have you participated in

discussions online or face to face?” obtained the lowest weighted mean of

2.22, which was ranked 4th and was interpreted as Sometimes. Overall, the

College Experience of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL in terms of Learner

Engagement was Sometimes with an average weighted mean of 2.42.

Result showed that the nursing graduates of UPHSL had always

experienced working with other students as a part of their learning

experience but sometimes participated in discussions online or face to face

during their college. The results also showed that almost all the listed

indicators of learner engagement were sometimes experienced by the

nursing graduates.

This indicates that during their college life, the nursing graduates of

UPHSL were more interested in working with other students than

participating in discussions.
43

Table 6. Weighted Mean & Ranking of the College Experience of Nursing


Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of Learner Engagement
Learner Engagement

3. School Activities: How Weighted Interpretation Rank


frequent have you…
Mean

a. Participated in 2.31 Sometimes 2


intramural/sports fest/varsity
team?
b. Held a leadership position in 1.53 Sometimes 7
a student club, campus
organization, residence hall, or
fraternity/sorority?
c. Been an active member of 1.64 Sometimes 5
any non-academic club?
d. Been an active member of 1.56 Sometimes 6
any academic club?
e. Participated in a leadership- 1.72 Sometimes 4
training program?
f. Affiliated with religious 1.75 Sometimes 3
clubs/ participated in religious
activities?
g. Participated in activities that 2.28 Sometimes 1
helped you explore your career
options?
Average Weighted Mean 1.83 Sometimes

Table 6 shows the College Experience of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL

batch 2015 in terms of Learner Engagement. Indicator 3.G. “How frequent

have you participated in activities that helped you explore your career

options?” obtained the largest weighted mean of 2.28, was ranked 1st and

was interpreted as Sometimes. While indicator 3.B. “How frequent have you

held a leadership position in a student club, campus organization, residence


44

hall, or fraternity/sorority?” obtained the lowest weighted mean of 1.53,

which was ranked 7th and was interpreted as Sometimes. Overall, the College

Experience of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL in terms of Learner Engagement

was Sometimes with an average weighted mean of 1.83.

Results showed that the nursing graduates of UPHSL had sometimes

experienced participating in activities that helped them explore their career

options but sometimes experienced to hold a leadership position in a student

club, campus organization or fraternity/sorority during their college. The

results also showed that all the listed indicators of learner engagement were

sometimes experienced by the nursing graduates.

This indicates that during their college life, the nursing graduates of

UPHSL were more interested in participating in activities that helped them

explore their careers than holding a leadership position in any organizations.


45

Table 7. Weighted Mean & Ranking of the College Experience of Nursing


Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of Teaching Quality
Teaching Quality Weighted Interpretation Rank
Mean
Taking into consideration all of the faculty with whom you have
interacted at the college/university you graduated from, how often
have you experienced each faculty:
a. Gave clear explanations 2.53 Always 8

b. Made good use of examples 2.62 Always 5


and illustrations to explain
difficult points
c. Gave assignments that helped 2.69 Always 4
in the learning process
d. Stimulated you intellectually 2.72 Always 2.5

e. Commented on your work in 2.59 Always 6


ways that help you learn
f. Were helpful and approachable 2.72 Always 2.5

g. Had a mastery of the subject 2.84 Always 1


matter taught
h. Made use of class time 2.56 Always 7
effectively
Average Weighted Mean 2.66 Always

Table 7 shows the College Experience of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL

batch 2015 in terms of Teaching Quality. Indicator G. “How often have you

experienced each faculty had a mastery of the subject matter taught?”

obtained the largest weighted mean of 2.84, was ranked 1st and was

interpreted as Always. While indicator A. “How often have you experienced

each faculty gave clear explanations?” obtained the lowest weighted mean of

2.53, was ranked 8th and was interpreted as Always. Overall, the College
46

Experience of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL in terms of Teaching Quality was

Always with an average weighted mean of 2.66.

Results showed that the nursing graduates of UPHSL had always

experienced each faculty had a mastery of the subject matter taught that

helped their learning process and stimulated them intellectually. They had

also experienced faculty who always gave clear explanations during their

college. The results also showed that all the listed indicators of teaching

quality were always experienced by the nursing graduates.

This indicates that the nursing graduates of UPHSL had been prepared

by their faculties mentally and intellectually.

Table 8. Weighted Mean & Ranking of the College Experience of Nursing


Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of Student Support
Services.
Student Support Services Weighted Interpretation Rank
Mean
During the time you were in college, how frequent did the following
staff members provide you with specialized services?
a. Administrative staff (Cashier, 2.19 Sometimes 3.5
Registrar, Security, etc.)
b. Librarians 2.34 Sometimes 1

c. Guidance Counselors 2.03 Sometimes 5

d. Chaplain/ Pastor/ Religious 2.00 Sometimes 6


Minister or Elder
e. Laboratory Technicians 2.25 Sometimes 2

f. Research Personnel 2.19 Sometimes 3.5

Average Weighted Mean 2.17 Sometimes


47

Table 8 shows the College Experience of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL

batch 2015 in terms of Student Support Services. Indicator B. “how frequent

did the Librarians provide you with specialized services?” obtained the

largest weighted mean of 2.34, was ranked 1st and was interpreted as

Sometimes. While Indicator D. “how frequent did the Chaplain/ Pastor/

Religious Minister or Elder provide you with specialized services?” obtained

the lowest weighted mean of 2.00, was ranked 6th and was interpreted as

Sometimes. Overall, the college experience of nursing graduates of UPHSL in

terms of Student Support Services was Sometimes with an average weighted

mean of 2.17.

Results showed that the nursing graduates of UPHSL had enough

support services especially from the University librarian than the Chaplain/

Pastor/ Religious Minister during their college. It also showed that all the

listed indicators of student support services were sometimes available and

helpful to the nursing graduates.

This indicates that the nursing graduates of UPHSL had more access to

the library than any other offices inside their University.


48

Table 9. Weighted Mean & Ranking of the College Experience of Nursing


Graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in terms of Overall College
Experience
Overall College Experience Weighted Interpretation Rank
Mean
Your College Experience had…

a. Helped you connect what 2.84 Agree 1


you have learned in the
classroom with real life
situations.
b. Helped you translate what 2.84 Agree 1
you have learned inside the
classroom into action.
c. Had a positive influence on 2.81 Agree 2
your intellectual growth and
interest in ideas.
d. Had a positive influence on 2.84 Agree 1
your personal growth,
attitudes, and values.
Average Weighted Mean 2.83 Agree

Table 9 shows the College Experience of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL

batch 2015 in terms of Overall College Experience. Indicators A. “Your

college experience had helped you connect what you have learned in the

classroom with real life situations”, B. “Your college experience had helped

you translate what you have learned inside the classroom into action” and D.

“Your college experience had a positive influence on your personal growth,

attitudes, and values” obtained the largest weighted mean of 2.84, were

ranked 1st and were interpreted as Agree. While Indicator C. “Your college

experience had a positive influence on your intellectual growth and interest

in ideas” obtained the lowest weighted mean of 2.81, was ranked 2nd and
49

was interpreted as Agree. Overall, the college experience of nursing

graduates of UPHSL in terms of Overall College Experience was Agree with

an average weighted mean of 2.83.

Results showed that the nursing graduates’ overall college experience

had a positive influence towards their personal growth, attitudes and values

and it also helped them to apply what they have learned inside the

classroom to real life situations. It also showed that the nursing graduates

agreed to all listed indicators of overall college experience.

This indicates that the overall college experience of the nursing

graduates of UPHSL had a positive influence towards them which they can

actually apply to their work and help them provide quality and holistic

nursing care.

Table 10. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of NLE performance of


UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015, test subject (NP1)

NP1 Frequency Percentage Interpretation Rank


88 and 1 3.70 Excellent 5
above
82-87 3 11.11 Very good 2.5
78-81 18 66.67 Good 1
75-77 3 11.11 Satisfactory 2.5
74 and 2 7.41 Failed 4
below
Total 27 100.00 --
50

Table 10 shows the NLE performance of UPHSL graduates of batch

2015 in test subject (NP1). Taking into consideration, the study has a total of

32 respondents and only 27 out of 32 took the exam. There are 18

respondents out of 27 accounting to 66.67% percent interpreted as good

ranked first while on the other hand a respondent got 88 and above

accounting for the 3.70% of the total population of the respondents who took

the exam with an interpretation of excellent ranked fifth.

With the above cited interpretation, NLE performance of UPHSL

nursing graduates of 2015 in line with the data gathered had a good result

for the test subject (NP1).

Table 11. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of NLE performance of


UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015, test subject (NP2)

NP2 Frequency Percentage Interpretation Rank


82-87 1 3.70 Very good 4
78-81 15 55.56 Good 1
75-77 4 14.81 Satisfactory 3
74 and 7 25.93 Failed 2
below
Total 27 100.00 --

Table 11 shows the NLE performance of UPHSL graduates of batch

2015 in test subject (NP2). There are 15 respondents out of 27 accounting to

55.56% interpreted as good ranked first, 7 out of 27 respondents accounting

to 25.93% interpreted as failed ranked second, making 4 out of 27

respondents accounting to 14.81% interpreted as satisfactory ranked third


51

thus the remaining respondent got 82-87 accounting for the 3.70% of the

total population of the respondents who took the exam with an interpretation

of excellent ranked fourth.

With the above cited interpretation, NLE performance of UPHSL

nursing graduates of 2015 in line with the data gathered had a good result

for the test subject (NP2).

Table 12. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of NLE performance of


UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015, test subject (NP3)

NP3 Frequency Percentage Interpretation Rank


82-87 4 14.81 Very good 4
78-81 7 25.93 Good 2.5
75-77 7 25.93 Satisfactory 2.5
74 and 9 33.33 Failed 1
below
Total 27 100.00 --

Table 12 shows the NLE performance of UPHSL graduates of batch

2015 in test subject (NP3). There are 9 respondents out of 27 accounting to

33.33% interpreted as failed ranked first while on the other hand a

respondent got 82-87 accounting for the 14.81% of the total population of

the respondents who took the exam with an interpretation of excellent

ranked fourth.

With the above cited interpretation, NLE performance of UPHSL

nursing graduates of 2015 in line with the data gathered had a failed result

for the test subject (NP3).


52

Table 13. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of NLE performance of


UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015, test subject (NP4)

NP4 Frequency Percentage Interpretation Rank


88 and 1 3.70 Excellent 4.5
above
82-87 1 3.70 Very good 4.5
78-81 13 48.15 Good 1
75-77 6 22.22 Satisfactory 2.5
74 and 6 22.22 Failed 2.5
below
Total 27 100.00 --

Table 13 shows the NLE performance of UPHSL graduates of batch

2015 in test subject (NP4). There are 13 respondents out of 27 accounting to

48.15% percent interpreted as good ranked first while on the other hand a

respondent got 88 and above, the other got 82-87 row score accounting for

the 3.70% of the total population of the respondents who took the exam

with an interpretation of excellent and very good ranked equally four fifths.

With the above cited interpretation, NLE performance of UPHSL

nursing graduates of 2015 in line with the data gathered had a good result

for the test subject (NP4).

Table 14. Frequency and Percentage Distribution of NLE performance of


UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015, test subject (NP5)

NP5 Frequency Percentage Interpretation Rank


78-81 2 7.41 Good 3
75-77 4 14.81 Satisfactory 2
74 and 21 77.78 Failed 1
below
Total 27 100.00 --
53

Table 14 shows the NLE performance of UPHSL graduates of batch

2015 in test subject (NP5) There were 21 respondents out of 27 accounting

to almost 77.78% interpreted as failed ranked first, 4 out of 27 respondents

accounting to 14.81% interpreted as satisfactory ranked second, making the

remaining 2 out of 27 respondents accounting to 7.41% interpreted as good

ranked.

With the above cited interpretation, NLE performance of UPHSL

nursing graduates of 2015 in line with the data gathered had a failed result

for the test subject (NP5).

Table 15. Weighted Mean and Ranking of the respondents’ employment


profile in terms of Employment history
How was your Weighted Interpretation Rank
employability... Mean
1. When did you start 1.72 4 months to 9 months 2
looking for work?
2. When did you start 1.59 4 months to 9 months 3
working in your first
job after you
graduated from
college?
3. How long did it take 2.31 4 months to 9 months 1
before you were able
to get a job?
Average Weighted 1.87 4 months to 9
Mean months

Table 15 shows the respondents’ employment profile in terms of

employment history. Indicator 3. “How was your employability? How long did

it take before you were able to get a job?” obtained the largest weighted
54

mean of 2.31, was ranked 1st and was interpreted as within 4 months to 9

months while indicator 2. “How was your employability? When did you start

working in your first job after you graduated from college?” obtained the

lowest weighted mean of 1.59, was ranked 3rd and was interpreted as within

4 months to 9 months.

Overall, the respondents’ employment profile in terms of employment

history was within 4 months to 9 months with an average weighted mean of

1.87.

Results showed that the respondents’ employment profile had a

positive influence towards how long it took before they were able to get a job

and also to when did they start working in their first job after graduating

from college. It also showed that the respondents’ employment history is

within 4 months to 9 months to all the indicators of employability.

This indicates that the respondents’ employment history had a positive

influence towards them which they can apply to their employment profile.
55

Table 16. Relationship between the College Experience in terms of Learner


Engagement and Nursing Licensure Examination of the UPHSL
Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 according to Five Subject
Classifications of Nursing Practice
Learner Pearson Interpretation t-test Interpretation
Engagement r
Com Criti
puted cal
NP1 -0.28 Weak -1.48 2.0 Not significant
relationship 60
NP2 -0.14 Very weak -0.73 2.0 Not significant
relationship 60
NP3 -0.26 Weak -1.33 2.0 Not significant
relationship 60
NP4 -0.21 Weak -1.10 2.0 Not significant
relationship 60
NP5 -0.28 Weak -1.45 2.0 Not significant
relationship 60
0.05 Level of Significance
Degree of freedom = 25
n=27

As shown in the Table 16, to find for the relationship between the

college experience in terms of learner engagement and nursing licensure

examination in terms of nursing practice 1, a computed Pearson r value of -

0.28 was obtained which is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows

that there is a weak relationship between the two variables that were

mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done

to test for the significance of Pearson r and was able to obtain a computed t-

value of -1.48 which is lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates

that there is no significant relationship between the college experience in

terms of learner engagement and nursing licensure examination in terms of


56

NP1. Both results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25

degree of freedom.

For the relationship between the college experience in terms of learner

engagement and nursing licensure examination in terms of nursing practice

2, a computed Pearson r value of -0.14 was obtained which is lower than the

tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak relationship

between the two variables that were mentioned above and the null

hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance of

Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -0.73 which is lower

than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no significant

relationship between the college experience in terms of learner engagement

and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP2. Both results were

obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

As to the relationship between the college experience in terms of

learner engagement and nursing licensure examination in terms of nursing

practice 3, a computed Pearson r value of -0.26 was obtained which is lower

than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a weak relationship

between the two variables that were mentioned above and the null

hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance of

Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -1.33 which is lower

than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no significant

relationship between the college experience in terms of learner engagement


57

and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP3. Both results were

obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

For the relationship between the college experience in terms of learner

engagement and nursing licensure examination in terms of nursing practice

4, a computed Pearson r value of -0.21 was obtained which is lower than the

tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a weak relationship between

the two variables that were mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be

accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance of Pearson rand was

able to obtain a computed t-value of -1.10 which is lower than the critical t-

value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no significant relationship

between the college experience in terms of learner engagement and nursing

licensure examination in terms of NP4. Both results were obtained using a

0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

Lastly, for the relationship between the college experience in terms of

learner engagement and nursing licensure examination in terms of nursing

practice 5, a computed Pearson r value of -0.28 was obtained which is lower

than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a weak relationship

between the two variables that were mentioned above and the null

hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance of

Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -1.45 which is lower

than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no significant

relationship between the college experience in terms of learner engagement


58

and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP5. Both results were

obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

Table 17. Relationship between the College Experience in terms of Teaching


Quality and Nursing Licensure Examination of the UPHSL Nursing
Graduates of batch 2015 according to Five Subject Classifications
of Nursing Practice
Teaching Pearson Interpretati t-test Interpretatio
Quality r on n
Computed Critical

Very weak
NP1 -0.11 -0.55 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Very weak
NP2 -0.15 -0.75 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Very weak
NP3 0.10 0.52 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Very weak
NP4 0.15 0.74 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Very weak
NP5 -0.01 -0.04 2.060 Not significant
relationship
0.05 Level of Significance
Degree of freedom = 25

As shown in the Table 17, to find for the relationship between the

college experience in terms of teaching quality and nursing licensure

examination in terms of nursing practice 1, a computed Pearson r value of -

0.11 was obtained which is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows

that there is a very weak relationship between the two variables that were

mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done

to test for the significance of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-
59

value of -0.55 which is lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates

that there is no significant relationship between the college experience in

terms of teaching quality and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP1.

Both results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree

of freedom.

For the relationship between the college experience in terms of

teaching quality and nursing licensure examination in terms of nursing

practice 2, a computed Pearson r value of -0.15 was obtained which is lower

than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -0.75 which is

lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no

significant relationship between the college experience in terms of teaching

quality and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP2. Both results were

obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

As to the relationship between the college experience in terms of

teaching quality and nursing licensure examination in terms of nursing

practice 3, a computed Pearson r value of 0.10 was obtained which is lower

than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance
60

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of 0.52 which is lower

than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no significant

relationship between the college experience in terms of teaching quality and

nursing licensure examination in terms of NP3. Both results were obtained

using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

For the relationship between the college experience in terms of

teaching quality and nursing licensure examination in terms of nursing

practice 4, a computed Pearson r value of 0.15 was obtained which is lower

than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of 0.74 which is lower

than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no significant

relationship between the college experience in terms of teaching quality and

nursing licensure examination in terms of NP4. Both results were obtained

using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

Lastly, for the relationship between the college experience in terms of

teaching quality and nursing licensure examination in terms of nursing

practice 5, a computed Pearson r value of -0.01 was obtained which is lower

than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance
61

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -0.04 which is

lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no

significant relationship between the college experience in terms of teaching

quality and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP5. Both results were

obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

Table 18. Relationship between the College Experience in terms of Student


Support Services and Nursing Licensure Examination of the
UPHSL Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 according to Five
Subject Classifications of Nursing Practice
Student Pearson Interpretati t-test Interpretati
Support r on on
Services Computed Critical
No
NP1 0.00 -0.01 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Very weak
NP2 -0.10 -0.51 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Very weak
NP3 -0.19 -0.95 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Very weak
NP4 -0.07 -0.33 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Weak
NP5 -0.31 -1.64 2.060 Not significant
relationship
0.05 Level of Significance
Degree of freedom = 25

As shown in the Table 18, to find for the relationship between the

college experience in terms of student support services and nursing licensure

examination in terms of nursing practice 1, a computed Pearson r value of

0.00 was obtained which is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows

that there is no relationship between the two variables that were mentioned
62

above and the null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for

the significance of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -

0.01 which is lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that

there is no significant relationship between the college experience in terms of

student support services and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP1.

Both results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree

of freedom.

For the relationship between the college experience in terms of

student support services and nursing licensure examination in terms of

nursing practice 2, a computed Pearson r value of -0.10 was obtained which

is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -0.51 which is

lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no

significant relationship between the college experience in terms of student

support services and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP2. Both

results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of

freedom.

As to the relationship between the college experience in terms of

student support services and nursing licensure examination in terms of

nursing practice 3, a computed Pearson r value of -0.19 was obtained which


63

is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -0.95 which is

lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no

significant relationship between the college experience in terms of student

support services and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP3. Both

results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of

freedom.

For the relationship between the college experience in terms of

student support services and nursing licensure examination in terms of

nursing practice 4, a computed Pearson r value of -0.07 was obtained which

is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -0.33 which is

lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no

significant relationship between the college experience in terms of student

support services and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP4. Both

results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of

freedom.
64

Lastly, for the relationship between the college experience in terms of

student support services and nursing licensure examination in terms of

nursing practice 5, a computed Pearson r value of -0.31 was obtained which

is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -1.64 which is

lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no

significant relationship between the college experience in terms of student

support services and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP5. Both

results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of

freedom.
65

Table 19. Relationship between the College Experience in terms of Overall


College Experience and Nursing Licensure Examination of UPHSL
Nursing Graduates of batch 2015 according to Five Subject
Classifications of Nursing Practice
Overall Pears Interpretat t-test Interpretatio
College on r ion n
Experience Computed Critical
Very weak
NP1 -0.08 -0.40 2.060 Not significant
relationship
No
NP2 0.00 0.01 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Very Weak
NP3 -0.13 -0.63 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Very Weak
NP4 -0.05 -0.26 2.060 Not significant
relationship
Very Weak
NP5 -0.02 -1.09 2.060 Not significant
relationship
0.05 Level of Significance
Degree of freedom = 25

As shown in the Table 19, to find for the relationship between the

college experience in terms of overall college experience and nursing

licensure examination in terms of nursing practice 1, a computed Pearson r

value of -0.08 was obtained which is lower than the tabular value of 0.38.

This shows that there is a very weak relationship between the two variables

that were mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test

was done to test for the significance of Pearson rand was able to obtain a

computed t-value of -0.40 which is lower than the critical t-value of 2.060.

This indicates that there is no significant relationship between the college

experience in terms of overall college experience and nursing licensure


66

examination in terms of NP1. Both results were obtained using a 0.05 level

of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

For the relationship between the college experience in terms of overall

college experience and nursing licensure examination in terms of nursing

practice 2, a computed Pearson r value of 0.00 was obtained which is lower

than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is no relationship

between the two variables that were mentioned above and the null

hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance of

Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of 0.01 which is lower

than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no significant

relationship between the college experience in terms of overall college

experience and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP2. Both results

were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

As to the relationship between the college experience in terms of

overall college experience and nursing licensure examination in terms of

nursing practice 3, a computed Pearson r value of -0.13 was obtained which

is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -0.63 which is

lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no
67

significant relationship between the college experience in terms of overall

college experience and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP3. Both

results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of

freedom.

For the relationship between the college experience in terms of overall

college experience and nursing licensure examination in terms of nursing

practice 4, a computed Pearson r value of -0.05 was obtained which is lower

than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -0.26 which is

lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no

significant relationship between the college experience in terms of overall

college experience and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP4. Both

results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of

freedom.

Lastly, for the relationship between the college experience in terms of

overall college experience and nursing licensure examination in terms of

nursing practice 5, a computed Pearson r value of -0.02 was obtained which

is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance
68

of Pearson rand was able to obtain a computed t-value of -1.09 which is

lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no

significant relationship between the college experience in terms of overall

college experience and nursing licensure examination in terms of NP5. Both

results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of

freedom.

Table 20. Relationship between the Respondents’ College Experience to their


Employment
Pearson Interpretatio Interpretatio
Variable t-test
r n n

Compute Critic
d al
Learning
Very Weak
Engageme -0.10 -0.49 2.060 Not Significant
Relationship
nt
Teaching Very Weak
0.13 0.64 2.060 Not Significant
Quality Relationship
Student
Very Weak
Support -0.07 -0.35 2.060 Not Significant
Relationship
Services
Overall
Weak
College -0.28 -1.44 2.060 Not Significant
Relationship
Experience
Degree of Freedom = 25

As shown in table 20, to find for the relationship between the

respondents’ college experience to their employment in terms of learning

engagement, a computed Pearson r value of -0.10 was obtained which is

lower than the tabular value of 0.36. This shows that there is a very weak

relationship between the two variables that were mentioned above and the
69

null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance

of Pearson r and was able to obtain a computed t-value of -0.49 which is

lower than the critical t-value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no

significant relationship between the respondents’ college experience to their

employment in terms of learning engagement. Both results were obtained

using 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

For the relationship between the respondents’ college experience to

their employment in terms of teaching quality, a computed Pearson r value

of 0.13 was obtained which is lower than the tabular value of 0.36. This

shows that there is a very weak relationship between the two variables that

were mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was

done to test for the significance of Pearson r and was able to obtain a

computed t-value of 0.64 which is lower than the critical t-value of 2.060.

This indicates that there is no significant relationship between the

respondents’ college experience to their employment in terms of teaching

quality. Both results were obtained using a 0.05 level of significance and a

25 degree of freedom.

As to the relationship between the respondents’ college experience to

their employment in terms of students support services, a computed Pearson

r value of -0.07 was obtained which is lower than the tabular value of 0.36.

This shows that there is a very weak relationship between the two variables

that were mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test
70

was done to test for the significance of Pearson r and was able to obtain a

computed t-value of -0.35 which is lower than the critical t-value of 2.060.

This indicates that there is no significant relationship between the

respondents’ college experience to their employability in terms of students

support services. Both results were obtained using a 0.05 level of

significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

Lastly, for the relationship between the respondents’ college

experience to their employability in terms of overall college experience, a

computed Pearson r value of -0.07 was obtained which is lower than the

tabular value of 0.36. This shows that there is a weak relationship between

the two variables that were mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be

accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance of Pearson r and was

able to obtain a computed t-value of -1.44 which is lower than the critical t-

value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no significant relationship

between the respondents’ college experience to their employment in terms of

overall college experience. Both results were obtained using a 0.05 level of

significance and a 25 degree of freedom.


71

Table 21. Relationship between the Respondents’ Nursing Licensure


Examination to their Employment

Employab Pearso Interpretatio Interpretatio


ility nr n t-test n

Compute Critic
d al
Very Weak
NP1 0.09 0.48 2.060 Not Significant
Relationship
Very Weak
NP2 0.02 0.08 2.060 Not Significant
Relationship
Weak
NP3 0.25 1.28 2.060 Not Significant
Relationship
Very Weak
NP4 0.10 0.52 2.060 Not Significant
Relationship
Moderate
NP5 0.41 2.27 2.060 Significant
Relationship

As shown in table 21, to find for the relationship between the

respondents’ NLE to their employment in terms of the result of their NP1, a

computed Pearson r value of 0.09 was obtained which is lower than the

tabular value of 0.38. This shows that there is a very weak relationship

between the two variables that were mentioned above and the null

hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done to test for the significance of

Pearson r and was able to obtain a computed t-value of 0.48 which is lower

than the critical value of 2.060. This indicates that there is no significant

relationship between the respondents’ NLE to their employment in terms of

the result of their NP1. Both results were obtained using 0.05 level of

significance and a 25 degree of freedom.


72

For the relationship between the respondents’ NLE to their

employment in terms of the result of their NP2, a computed Pearson r value

of 0.02 was obtained which is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This

shows that there is a very weak relationship between the two variables that

were mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was

done to test for the significance of Pearson r and was able to obtain a

computed t-value of 0.08 which is lower than the critical value of 2.060. This

indicates that there is no significant relationship between the respondents’

NLE to their employment in terms of the result of their NP2. Both results

were obtained using 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

For the relationship between the respondents’ NLE to their

employment in terms of the result of their NP3, a computed Pearson r value

of 0.25 was obtained which is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This

shows that there is a weak relationship between the two variables that were

mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was done

to test for the significance of Pearson r and was able to obtain a computed t-

value of 1.28 which is lower than the critical value of 2.060. This indicates

that there is no significant relationship between the respondents’ NLE to their

employment in terms of the result of their NP3. Both results were obtained

using 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

As to the relationship between the respondents’ NLE to their

employment in terms of the result of their NP4, a computed Pearson r value


73

of 0.10 was obtained which is lower than the tabular value of 0.38. This

shows that there is a very weak relationship between the two variables that

were mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was

done to test for the significance of Pearson r and was able to obtain a

computed t-value of 0.52 which is lower than the critical value of 2.060. This

indicates that there is no significant relationship between the respondents’

NLE to their employment in terms of the result of their NP4. Both results

were obtained using 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree of freedom.

Lastly, for the relationship between the respondents’ NLE to their

employment in terms of the result of their NP5, a computed Pearson r value

of 0.41 was obtained which is higher than the tabular value of 0.38. This

shows that there is a moderate relationship between the two variables that

were mentioned above and the null hypothesis will be accepted. A t-test was

done to test for the significance of Pearson r and was able to obtain a

computed t-value of 2.27 which is higher than the critical value of 2.060.

This indicates that there is a significant relationship between the

respondents’ NLE to their employment in terms of the result of their NP5.

Both results were obtained using 0.05 level of significance and a 25 degree

of freedom.
74

Chapter 5

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the summary of findings, conclusion and

recommendations formulated by the researchers based on the analysis and

the interpretation of results of the study that they had undertaken.

This study was conducted to evaluate the college experience, nursing

licensure examination, and employability studies of nursing graduates of

University of Perpetual Help – Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University of

batch 2015.

Specifically, it aimed to answer the following questions:

1. What is the college experience of UPHSL BS Nursing graduates of batch

2015 in terms of:

1.1 Learner engagement

1.2 Teaching quality

1.3 Student support service

1.4 Overall college experience

2. What are the ratings of the respondents in Nursing Licensure

Examination in terms of:

2.1 NP 1
75

2.2 NP 2

2.3 NP 3

2.4 NP 4

2.5 NP 5

3. What is the respondents’ employment profile in terms of:

3.1 Employment history

4. Is there a significant relationship between the college experiences of the

UPHSL BSN graduates of batch 2015 to NLE?

5. Is there a significant relationship between the respondents’ college

experience to their employment?

6. Is there a significant relationship between the respondents’ NLE to their

employment?

Summary

The following findings are summarized according to the statement of

the problem.

College Experience of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL in terms of Learner

Engagement, Teaching Quality, Student Support Services, and Overall

College Experience. The college experience of nursing graduates of UPHSL

batch 2015 in terms of learner engagement was Moderate with an average

weighted mean of 2.29; in terms of teaching quality was Always with an

average weighted mean of 2.66; in terms of student support services was


76

Sometimes with an average weighted mean of 2.17; and in terms of overall

college experience, the respondents had Agree with an average weighted

mean of 2.83.

Nursing Licensure Examination Ratings of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL

in terms of test subjects NP 1, NP 2, NP 3, NP 4 and NP 5. The nursing

licensure examination ratings of nursing graduates of UPHSL batch 2015 in

terms of test subject NP 1 had most of the respondents, 18 (66.67%) have a

good nursing licensure examination with an average within the range of 78-

81 while 1 (3.70%) have an excellent nursing licensure examination with an

average within the range of 88 and above; in terms of test subject NP 2 had

most of the respondents, 15 (55.56%) have a good nursing licensure

examination with an average within the range of 78-81 while 1 (3.70%)

have a very good nursing licensure examination with an average within the

range of 82-87; in terms of test subject NP 3 had most of the respondents, 9

(33.33%) have a failed nursing licensure examination with an average within

the range of 74 and below while 4 (14.81%) have a very good nursing

licensure examination with an average within the range of 82-87; in terms of

test subject NP 4 had most of the respondents, 13 (48.15%) have a good

nursing licensure examination with an average within the range of 78-81

while the other respondents got 88 and above and the other got 82-87 of

average, both have equal percentage of (3.70%) and have an excellent and

very good nursing licensure examination; in terms of test subject NP 5 had


77

most of the respondents, 21 (77.78%) have a failed nursing licensure

examination with an average within the range of 74 and below while 2

(7.41%) have a good nursing licensure examination with an average within

the range of 78-81.

The Respondents’ Employment Profile in terms of Employment History.

The respondents’ employment profile in terms of employment history was

within 4 months to 9 months with an average weighted mean of 1.87.

Significant relationship between the college experiences of the UPHSL

BSN graduates of batch 2015 to NLE. The relationship between College

Experience in terms of learner engagement and nursing licensure

examination of nursing practice 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 has been confirmed through

the computed value of Pearson r values of -0.28, -0.14, -0.26, -0.21, -0.28

were respectively acquired, which were lower than 0.38 tabular value at the

degree of freedom equivalent to 25 and interpreted as weak relationship.

Finding the for its significance, computed t values of -1.48, -0.73, -1.33, -

1.10, -1.45 respectively were obtained, which were lower than 2.060 critical

value at 0.05 level of significance and indicated as not significant. Null

hypothesis will be accepted.

The relationship between College Experience in terms of teaching

qualities and nursing licensure examination of nursing practice 1, 2, 3, 4 and

5 has been confirmed through the computed value of Pearson r values of -

0.11, -0.15, -0.10, -0.15, -0.01 were respectively acquired, which were
78

lower than 0.38 tabular value at the degree of freedom equivalent to 25 and

interpreted as very weak relationship. Finding the for its significance,

computed t values of -0.55, -0.75, 0.52, 0.74, -0.04 respectively were

obtained, which were lower than 2.060 critical value at 0.05 level of

significance and indicated as not significant. Null hypothesis will be accepted.

The relationship between College Experience in terms of student

support service and nursing licensure examination of nursing practice 1, 2, 3,

4 and 5 has been confirmed through the computed value of Pearson r values

of 0.00, -0.10, -0.19, -0.07, -0.31 were respectively acquired, which were

lower than 0.38 tabular value at the degree of freedom equivalent to 25 and

interpreted as very weak relationship. Finding the for its significance,

computed t values of -0.01, -0.51, -0.95, -0.33, -1.64 respectively were

obtained, which were lower than 2.060 critical value at 0.05 level of

significance and indicated as not significant. Null hypothesis will be accepted.

The relationship between College Experience in terms of overall

college experience and nursing licensure examination of nursing practice 1,

2, 3, 4 and 5 has been confirmed through the computed value of Pearson r

values of -0.08, 0.00, -0.14, -0.05, -0.02 were respectively acquired, which

were lower than 0.38 tabular value at the degree of freedom equivalent to

25 and interpreted as very weak relationship. Finding the for its significance,

computed t values of -0.40, 0.01, -0.63, -0.26, -1.09 respectively were


79

obtained, which were lower than 2.060 critical value at 0.05 level of

significance and indicated as not significant. Null hypothesis will be accepted.

Significant relationship between the respondents’ college experience to

their employability status. The computed Pearson r in college experience in

terms of learner engagement, teaching quality, student support system and

overall college experience between employability status were obtained

respectively with a Pearson r values of -0.10, 0.13, -0.07, -0.28 were less

than the tabular value of 0.38 and were interpreted as very weak in relation.

To find for its significance computed t values of -0.49, 0.64, -0.35, -1.44

were acquired respectively, results were lower than the critical value of

2.060 and were interpreted as not significant. Null hypothesis will be

accepted.

Significant relationship between the respondents’ NLE to their

employability status. The relationship between the respondents’ nursing

licensure examination of nursing practice 1, 2, 3, 4 to their employability

status shows very weak relationship excepting nursing practice 5 which

shows moderate relationship. The computed Pearson r values of 0.09, 0.02,

0.25, 0.10 were respectively obtained for nursing practice 1, 2, 3, and 4

while a Pearson r value of 0.41 for nursing practice 5. The significant results

were acquired respectively through the computed t values of 0.48, 0.08,

1.28, 0.52 for nursing practice 1, 2, 3, and 4 while for nursing practice 5 has

obtained a t value of 2.27 which were interpreted as not significant except


80

nursing practice 5 that was interpreted as moderately significant. Null

hypothesis will be accepted.

Conclusions

The following conclusions indicated below were drawn based on the

findings of the study:

1. The College Experience of nursing graduate of UPHSL batch 2015 in

terms of Learner engagement was experienced moderate; teaching

quality experienced was always; student support service experienced

was sometimes; and overall college experience as agreed.

2. Majority of the nursing graduates in UPHSL batch 2015 had a good

result in nursing licensure exam although there were 5 respondents

who did not take the NLE.

3. The respondent’s employment profile in terms of its employability

history was within 4 months to 9 months, therefore, respondents seek

their desired jobs as soon as they graduate.

4. College experience has no significance to the Nursing Licensure

Examination results of nursing graduates in UPHSL batch 2015.

5. College experience of nursing graduates in UPHSL is independent and

has no influence to their employment.

6. Nursing Licensure Examination results of nursing graduates in UPHSL

batch 2015 has a no influence to their employment except for NP5.


81

Recommendations

Based on the findings and conclusions, the following recommendations

were given:

1. The college of nursing should conduct activities that will improve the

relationship among nursing students. The students should

continuously be molded with the help of their clinical instructors, the

weak points should be strengthened and given emphasis and their

strengths should be continuously practiced for the betterment of their

college experience. The student support services must provide the

best way to utilize or maximize the resources available to deliver a

more accommodating and conducive place for students to learn.

2. The students should learn more from a vast collection of knowledge,

and should not depend on the general knowledge that they’ve learned.

The previous nursing licensure examination questions should be

discussed frequently in class and incorporated in long examinations of

the nursing students to serve as their review.

3. The students should learn how to market themselves with the support

of seminars that can enhance their confidence and capabilities.

Nursing students must show interest and must act on their outmost

performance as possible.
82

4. The future researchers of the same study should engage themselves in

conducting and tracing the previous graduates in efficient and effective

manner for them to achieve a very satisfactory result.


83

BIBLIOGRAPHY
84

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alam, 2010, An empirical study of factors affecting accounting students'


career choice in New Zealand. Retrieved (2016) from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261571863_An_empirical_s
tudy_of_factors_affecting_accounting_students%27_career_choice_in
_New_Zealand

American Association of College of nursing, 2013, “College experience,


Nursing Licensure Examination, and work Performance of Nursing
Graduates of UPHSL’ pb (2016), pg 15, pg 12

American Nurses Association, 2008, Profile and employability status of BSN


graduates of 2007 of University of Perpetual Help System Laguna

Androus, Lee & Spano, 2016, "Why 2016 & 2017 May Be the Best Time to
Start a Career as a Registered Nurse" Retrieved (2016) from:
https://www.registerednursing.org/2016-2017-best-time-start-career-
rn/

Awad, 2015, “Quality of Nursing Courses as Perceived by Students:


Relationship with Their Academic Achievement in Palestine College of
Nursing” Retrieved (2016) from:
https://file.scirp.org/pdf/OJN_2015011516392468.pdf

Bangbade, 2004, "Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching and


learning of Biology and Physic". Teaching and Teacher Education: 109-
102.

Beckford, 2008, Graduates turning to health care sector as jobs in finance


dry up. Retrieved (2016) from:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/3391160/Graduates-turning-
to-health-care-sector-as-jobs-in-finance-dry-up.html

Blake, 2010, Nursing Migration: Issues of Equity and Balance. Retrieved


(2016) from:
tapri.org.au/wpcontent/uploads/2016/02/v18n2_3blake.pdf

B. Dale, Leland & J. Dale, 2013, What Factors Facilitate Good Learning
85

Experiences in Clinical Studies in Nursing: Bachelor Students’


Perceptions. Retrieved (2016) from:
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/628679/

Caldwell (2008), “Performance in academics, nurse licensure examination


and employability of batch 2008 nursing graduates of UPHSL”

Chan, 2009, Development of an innovative tool to assess hospital learning.


Nurse Education Today, 21(8), 624-631.

Chen & Hu, 2008, An empirical study of the influence of the concept of “job-
hunting” on graduates’ employment. Retrieved (2016) from:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11516-008-0037-z

Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation [CLEAR], 2000, Licensure


Examinations. Retrieved (2016) from:
https://www.clearhq.org/resources/Licensure_examinations.htm

Cruz & Nuqui, 2014, Revisiting the Employability and Productivity of Nursing
Graduates of La Consolacion University Philippines. Retrieved (2016)
from:http://www.academia.edu/10172622/Revisiting_the_Employabili
ty_and_Productivity_of_Nursing_Graduates_of_La_Consolacion_Univer
sity_Philippines

Dangan, 2015, Correlation of Teacher Education Graduates’ Academic


Performance, Licensure Examination Performance, Type of Work and
Waiting Time for Job Search. Retrieved (2016) from:
https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=2400

David I. Auerch, Peter I. Buerhaus, Douglas O. Staiger; July 2014, “The size
of the RN workforce vol. 33 no. 81474-1480

De Mesa, M., Del Rosario, A., Delgado, P.B., Desepeda, M., Dimaunahan,
J.E., (2009). Professional achievements of the nursing graduates of
Lyceum of the Philippines University 2006-2008. Undergraduate
Thesis. LPU – Batangas.

Ehrenburg and Smith 2000; Blau. Ferber, Winkler 2001, “Factors influencing
Nursing employability”

Esguerra, 2008, Tracer Study of Nursing Graduates of UPHSL Class 2004

Floyd, 2004; “New Roles for student support services in distance learning”;
86

Retrieved (2016) from:


https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227518966

Gonzales, 2013, Graduate tracer study. Knowledge Community. Retrieved


(2016) from: http://knowledgecommunity.ph/?page_id=43.

Hayes, Bonner & Pryor, 2010, “Factors contributing to nurse job satisfaction
in the acute hospital setting: A review of literature”

Howard, 2010, "The nursing profession under siege" Retrieved (2016) from:
http://news.abs-cbn.com/-depth/07/09/10/nursing-profession-under-
siege

Ismail, Aboushady & Eswi, 2016, “Clinical instructor’s behavior: Nursing


student’s perception toward effective clinical instructor’s
characteristics”; Retrieved (2016) from:
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jnep/article/viewFile/6941/49
59

Johnston, 2009, The importance of the baccalaureate degree in nursing


education. Peoria magazine. Com.

Lee, 2011, “Employment overview in the Philippines. Jumpstart to your


career: The Handbook of finding your dream job.” Mandaluyong City
Summit Publication. Page 11-20.

Lorma Colleges, College of Nursing, 2012, Graduate Tracer Study of Lorma


Colleges, College of Nursing, Retrieved (2016) from:
http://www.academia.edu/4868779/Graduate_Tracer_Study_of_LORM
A_Colleges_College_of_Nursing

M. Ahmad, Alasad, Tabar & H. Ahmad, 2015, Nursing Student's Experiences


in Critical Care Course: A Qualitative Study. Retrieved (2016) from:
http://criticalcare.imedpub.com/nursing-students-experiences-in-
critical-care-course-a-qualitative-study.php?aid=7244

Newstorm and Davis 2010, Flippo 1984, “Performance in academics, nurse


licensure examination and employability of batch 2008 nursing
graduates of UPHSL”, Retrieved (2016) from:
http://www.peoriamagazines.com/ibi/2009/apr/importance-
baccalaureate-degree-nursingeducation.

Philippine Normal University [PNU], 2014, Tracer Study of PNU Graduates.


87

Retrieved (2016) from:


www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_3_March_2014/10.pdf

Powers, 2010, “Educating for Careers”, Retrieved (2016) from:


http://www.psupress.org/books/titles/0-271-00511- 4.html

Rena, 2000, Factors Affecting the Academic Performance of the Student


Nurses of BSU. Retrieved (2016) from:
http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.nursing.20150502.04.html

Republic Act No. 9173, 2002, "Philippine Nursing Act of


2002." Retrieved (2016) from:
http://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2002/10/21/republic-act-no-9173/

Rydon, 2008, Graduates and initial employment,


Retrieved (2016) from:
http://www.nurseeducationtoday.com/article/S0260-6917(07)00153-
0/abstract

Schomburg, 2011, Improving Higher Education Quality, a Daydream?


Retrieved (2016) from: https://dokterphi.wordpress.com/tag/tracer-
study/

Seeman, E. “Creating an Online Orientation and student Support Services,”:


Instructional Telecommunications Council, 2001

Tomey, 2015, Guide to Nursing Management and Leadership. 7th Edition.


Singapore: Elsevier Pte Ltd. Retrieved (2016) from:
http://www.mjn.com.my/articles_vwful.aspx?transid=56c5ef46-7232-
45aa-a31a-9f03b8a5437b

Tomlinson, 2003, “Fulfilling the Promise of the Differentiated Classroom”


Retrieved (2016) from:
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/103107/chapters/Teacher-
Response-to-Student-Needs@-A-Starting-Point-for-
Differentiation.aspx

Vera, 2013, Philippine Nursing Licensure Exam (NLE) Test Plan & Scope,
Retrieved (2016) from: https://nurseslabs.com/nursing-licensure-
examination-philippines-test-plan-scope-of-examination/

Zysberg, 2008, Nursing students' expectations of the college experience.


Retrieved (2016) from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18792705
88

APPENDIX A

COMMUNICATION LETTER
89
90
91
92
93
94

APPENDIX B

SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE
95

Dear Alumnus,

Good day!
We, the Group 4 of 4th year nursing students of University of Perpetual
Help System Laguna, are conducting a graduate tracer study entitled
“Graduate Tracer Study of Nursing Graduates in UPHSL Batch 2015.” We
would like to ask for your help in providing us your sincere and honest
answers on the questions provided in this questionnaire. We, the
researchers, assure you that the information you will provide will be held
in utmost value and confidentiality. We would highly appreciate it if you
could kindly complete the questionnaire.

Thank you very much for your anticipated support. Have a nice day. God
bless!

Name: _________________________________________
(Last Name) (First Name) (MI)

I. COLLEGE EXPERIENCE

Please check the appropriate box after each statement, to indicate how good
your college experience was back then. Try to recall the times that you were
still taking up Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Legend

3 High

2 Moderate

1 Low
96

Questions
1.1 LEARNER ENGAGEMENT
1. During your college HIGH MODERATE LOW
years, to what extent
have you…

a. Had a sense of
belongingness to your
university?
b. Felt prepared for your
study

Please check the appropriate box after each statement, to indicate how good
your college experience was back then. Try to recall the times that you were
still taking up Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Legend

3 ALWAYS

2 SOMETIMES

1 NEVER

2. During that time, how ALWAYS SOMETIME NEVER


frequent have you… S

a. Participated in discussions
online or face to face?
b. Worked with other
students as a part of your
study?
97

c. Interacted with students


outside your study
requirements?
d. Interacted with students
who were very different
from you?

3. School activities: How ALWAYS SOMETIME NEVER


frequent have you… S

a. Participated in
intramural/sports
fest/varsity team?
b. Held a leadership position
in a student club, campus
organization, residence
hall, or fraternity/sorority?
c. Been an active member of
any non-academic club?
d. Been an active member of
any academic club?
e. Participated in a
leadership-training
program?
f. Affiliated with religious
clubs/participated in
religious activities?
g. Participated in activities
that helped you explore
your career options?
98

1.2 TEACHING QUALITY


4. Taking into ALWAYS SOMETIME NEVER
consideration all of the S
faculty with whom you
have interacted at the
college/university you
graduated from, how
often have you
experienced each
faculty:
a. Gave clear explanations
b. Made good use of
examples and illustrations
to explain difficult points.
c. Gave assignments that
helped in the learning
process
d. Stimulated you
intellectually
e. Commented on your work
in ways that help you
learn
f. Were helpful and
approachable
g. Had a mastery of the
subject matter taught
h. Made use of class time
effectively

1.3 STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES


5. During the time you ALWAYS SOMETIME NEVER
were in college, how S
frequent did the
following staff
members provide you
with specialized
services?
a. Administrative staff
(Cashier, Registrar,
Security, etc.)
b. Librarians
c. Guidance counselors
99

d. Chaplain/ Pastor/
Religious Minister or
Elder
e. Laboratory Technicians
f. Research Personnel

Please check the appropriate box after each statement, to indicate how good
your college experience was back then. Try to recall the times that you were
still taking up Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Legend

3 AGREE

2 UNDECIDED

1 DISAGREE

1.4 OVERALL COLLEGE EXPERIENCE


Your college experience AGREE UNDECIDED DISAGREE
has…

a. Helped you connect


what you have learned
in the classroom with
real life situations
b. Helped you translate
what you have learned
inside the classroom
into action.
100

c. Had a positive influence


on your intellectual
growth and interest in
ideas.

d. Had a positive influence


on your personal
growth, attitudes, and
values.

II. EMPLOYMENT

How was your Employability? Please check the inside part of the open and
close parentheses that corresponds to your choice.
2.1 EMPLOYABILITY

Questions

1. When did you start looking for ( ) Less than 3 months


work?
( ) 4 months to 9 months

( ) More than 10 months

2. When did you start working in ( ) Less than 3 months


your first job after you
graduated from college? ( ) 4 months to 9 months

( ) More than 10 months

3. How long did it take before ( ) Less than 3 months


you were able to get a job?
( ) 4 months to 9 months

( ) More than 10 months


101

CURRICULUM VITAE
102

Name: Canindo, Kertz Ehman A.

Group/Batch: Group 4 / Batch 2018

Nickname: Kertz

Address: Blk 2 Lot 43 St. Joseph Village 1, San

Vicente, San Pedro, Laguna

Birthdate: June 9, 1991

Religion: Catholic

Email Address: ckertzehman@yahoo.com.ph

Mother’s Name: Emma A. Canindo

Father’s Name: Michael C. Canindo

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Primary : Colegio San Agustin Biñan, Immaculate Heart of Mary School


Academic Year: 2000 - 2006

Secondary : Immaculate Heart of Mary School

Academic Year: 2006 - 2010


Tertiary : UPH - Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University
Academic Year: 2015 - 2018

“Mirror Mirror on the wall, I’ll always get up after I fall. And whether
I run, walk or have to crawl, I’ll set my goals and achieve them all.”
103

Name: Dimaguila, Mia Noryani B.

Group/Batch: Group 4 / Batch 2018

Nickname: Mia

Address: Phase 1E Block 7 Lot 3 Stage 5

Davao Street Macaria Village, Biñan, Laguna

Birthdate: June 26, 1990

Religion: Christian (Born Again)

Email Address:

miadimaguila062690@gmail.com

Mother’s Name: Milagros B. Dimaguila

Father’s Name: Alejandro B. Dimaguila

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Primary : Casa Del Niño Montessori and Science High School


Academic Year: 1996 - 2002
Secondary : Colegio San Agustin Biñan
Academic Year: 2002 - 2006
Tertiary : UPH - Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University
Academic Year: 2017 - 2018

“For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans to
prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a
future-Jeremiah 29:11. With Gods' love and guidance nothing is
impossible.”
104

Name: Sakamoto, Maria Beatriz R.

Group/Batch: Group 4 / Batch 2018

Nickname: Bea

Address: Ph6 #18 Waling waling St. Pacita

Complex 1, San Pedro, Laguna

Birthdate: April 1, 1996

Religion: Catholic

Email Address: Beasaka011212@gmail.com

Mother’s Name: Sakamoto, Maria Socorro R.

Father’s Name: Sakamoto, Toshiki

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Primary : Asamizo Elementary School


Academic Year: 2002 - 2008

Secondary : Casa Del Niño Science High School


Academic Year: 2008 - 2012

Tertiary : UPH - Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University


Academic Year: 2015 – 2018

“Fall seven times, Stand up eight”


105

Name: Sicat, Minette E.

Group/Batch: Group 4 / Batch 2018

Nickname: Nette

Address: Blk 4, lot 2 & 3, Brgy. Bagong Silang

Sucat, Muntinlupa City

Birthdate: May 5, 1998

Religion: MCGI

Email Address: nettecruz27@gmail.com

Mother’s Name: Sicat, Melinda E.

Father’s Name: Sicat, Miner C.

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Primary : Bagong Silang Elementary School


Academic Year: 2005 - 2010

Secondary : Abuyog Academy


Academic Year: 2010 - 2014

Tertiary : UPH - Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University


Academic Year: 2015 – 2018

“Good sense makes on slow to anger, and it is his glory to overlook


an offense. (Proverbs 19:1 Better the poor whose walk is blameless
than a fool whose lips are perverse.)”
106

Name: Sigue, Renz Ann A.

Group/Batch: Group 4 / Batch 2018

Nickname: Rennie

Address: Platero, Biñan City, Laguna

Birthdate: May 1, 1998

Religion: Roman Catholic

Email Address: siguerenzann@gmail.com

Mother’s Name: Susan A. Sigue

Father’s Name: Turiano C. Sigue

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Primary : Platero Elementary School


Academic Year: 2004 - 2010

Secondary : St. Michael's College of Laguna


Academic Year: 2010 - 2014

Tertiary : UPH - Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University


Academic Year: 2014 - 2018

"Not all of us can do great things. But we can do small things with
great love."
107

Name: Susa, Jessica Wezen B.

Group/Batch: Group 4 / Batch 2018

Nickname: Jessica, Jessy

Address: B42 L2 Araneta St. Katarungan

Village, Muntinlupa City

Birthdate: January 12, 1997

Religion: Roman Catholic

Email Address: jwezen@yahoo.com

Mother’s Name: Carolyn Jane B. Susa

Father’s Name: Gabriel Rafael Valiente B. Susa

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Primary : Southernside Montessori School


Academic Year: 2007 - 2009

Secondary : Southernside Montessori School


Academic Year: 2009 - 2013

Tertiary : UPH - Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University


Academic Year: 2014 - 2018

“However difficult life may seem, there is always something you can
do and succeed at. It matters that you don’t just give up. – Stephen
Hawking”
108

Name: Torres, Jean Elyssa P.

Group/Batch: Group 4 / Batch 2018

Nickname: Jean, Ellie

Address: Barangay Langgam, San Pedro

Laguna

Birthdate: September 26, 1997

Religion: Catholic

Email Address: tjeanelyssa@gmail.com

Mother’s Name: Jacqueline P. Torres

Father’s Name: Edwin A. Torres

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Primary : La Paz Elementary School, Makati City


Academic Year: 2007 - 2010

Secondary : IETI College of Science and Technology, San Pedro, Laguna


Academic Year: 2010-2014

Tertiary : UPH - Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University


Academic Year: 2014 - 2018

"In running and in life, mile one is always the hardest. Stop doubting
yourself, work hard and make it happen.”
109

Name: Villaluz, Jhon Christian R.

Group/Batch: Group 4 / Batch 2018

Nickname: JC

Address: Blk 23 Lot 27 Ph. 3 Brgy. Dila


Golden City Sta. Rosa, Laguna

Birthdate: September 16, 1997

Religion: Catholic

Email Address:

jhonchristianvillaluz@yahoo.com

Mother’s Name: Leslie Chari Reyes

Father’s Name: Jonathan A. Villaluz

EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Primary : Chair of St. Peter School


Academic Year: 2004 – 2010

Secondary : Meridian Educational Institute


Academic Year: 2010 – 2014

Tertiary : UPH-Dr. Jose G. Tamayo Medical University


Academic Year: 2014 - 2018

“Greatness comes from small Beginnings. True life is becoming


something small that is part of something Big.”

Вам также может понравиться