Rubrics For Project Evaluation

GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU
Rubrics for Project Evaluation
RUBRICS FOR PROJECT

EVALUATION
Project Evaluation Sheet
Fault Distance Locator in

Title of Project Underground cable using Arduino
Name of Guide SUMALATHA E
SUMALATHA E ,
Name of Guide, Group In-charge Dr. ANANDATHIRTA B. GUDI,
Applicable POs / PSOs (1st Stage) PO2, PO6, PO7, PO10b, PO11
and HOD (1st Review) Dr. MANJUNATHA REDDY H
S
Applicable POs /PSOs (2nd Stage) PO3, PO10b, PSO1 Name of Guide (2nd Review) SUMALATHA E
SUMALATHA E , Dr.
PO1, PO3, PO4, PO5, PO8, PO9, Name of Guide, Group In-charge
Applicable POs / PSOs (Final Stage) ANANDATHIRTA B. GUDI, Dr.
PO10a, PO10b, PO12, PSO1, PSO2 and HOD (Final Review)
MANJUNATHA REDDY H S
Project Evaluation (First Review)

USN Name PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10(a) PO10(b) PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
1GA14
SHASHI KUMAR 95 94 93 90 91
EC114
1GA14
UMESH S 95 94 93 94 91
EC159
1GA14
YASHWANTH H 95 94 93 94 91
EC142
Project Evaluation (Second Review)
1GA14EC
SHASHI KUMAR 93 90 92
114
1GA14EC
UMESH S 93 94 92
159
1GA14EC
YASHWANTH H 93 94 92
142
Name & Signature of Examiner Name & Signature of Guide
Project Evaluation (Final Review)

1GA14EC
SHASHI KUMAR 96 96 96 95 96 24 24 24 96 98 96
114
1GA14EC
UMESH S 96 96 96 95 96 95 94 94 96 98 96
159
1GA14EC
YASHWANTH H 96 96 96 95 96 95 94 94 96 98 96
142

Project Evaluation - Engineering Knowledge (PO1)

(Preferably for Final Review)
Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

F1 F2 Avg.
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Critical selection and Effective application of Deficiencies in proper

Mathematical / Natural
application of Mathematical / Mathematical / Natural selection and use of
Science Fundamentals
Natural science principles science principles resulting Mathematical / Natural 5 5 5 50
(10) ensuring reasonable results. in reasonable solution. science principles.
Engineering Critical selection and Effective application of Deficiencies in proper

Fundamentals application of engineering engineering principles selection and use of
principles ensuring resulting in reasonable engineering principles. 4.4 4.8 4.6 46
(10) reasonable results. solution.
Total Marks 96
Project Evaluation - Problem Analysis (PO2)
(Preferably for First Review)

(Weightage) F1 F2 Avg.
(5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Finds 5 or more scholarly articles that Finds 3 or more scholarly articles closely Finds less than 3 closely
Literature are closely related to the project; related to the project and at least two other related scholarly articles or
Review thoroughly discusses the connection sources that are either not scholarly or not the discussion of the articles 4.8 4.4 4.6 46
is cursory
(10) between those articles and the project closely related; discussion of sources is
fairly thorough
Problem Makes use of reviewed literature and Makes use of reviewed literature and Not able to identify the gaps.
Identification identifies the gap accurately. identifies the gap with minor ambiguities.
5 5 5 25
(5)
Problem Problem clearly stated and well- Problem statement is mostly clear and fairly Problem statement is unclear
formulation defined; concepts and ideas are well-defined; concepts and ideas are or poorly defined; concepts
clearly articulated and formulated formulated with minor error and ideas are poorly 5 5 5 25
(5) articulated and formulated
Total Marks 96
Project Evaluation - Design & Development of solutions (PO3)
(Preferably for Second Review)

(5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Plans and sets objectives and how Plans and sets objectives but how to Does not have working design strategy
Design to achieve objectives is clearly achieve objectives is not clearly stated.
Strategy stated. Proposes alternative Proposes no alternative methods 5 5 5 40
methods
(8)
Knows the constraints and accounts Knows the constraints and accounts for Does not know about the constraints
for them in developing design them in developing design strategy with OR Does not account for them in
Constraints
strategy—Economical, ethical, minor errors or ignores one or two— design strategy OR ignores more than
4.5 4.5 4.5 36
social, cultural and environmental Economical, ethical, social, cultural and two-- Economical, ethical, social,
(8)
environmental. cultural and environmental.
Final Design Design meets and exceeds desired Design meets desired objectives. Barely capable of achieving desired
objectives. objectives. 5 5 5 20
(4)
Total Marks 96
Final Review

(5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Plans and sets objectives and how Plans and sets objectives but how to Does not have working design strategy
Design to achieve objectives is clearly achieve objectives is not clearly stated.
Strategy stated. Proposes alternative Proposes no alternative methods 5 5 5 40
methods
(8)
Knows the constraints and accounts Knows the constraints and accounts for Does not know about the constraints
for them in developing design them in developing design strategy with OR Does not account for them in
Constraints
strategy—Economical, ethical, minor errors or ignores one or two— design strategy OR ignores more than
4.5 4.5 4.5 36
social, cultural and environmental Economical, ethical, social, cultural and two-- Economical, ethical, social,
(8)
environmental. cultural and environmental.
Final Design Design meets and exceeds desired Design meets desired objectives. Barely capable of achieving desired
objectives. objectives. 5 5 5 20
(4)
Total Marks 96
Project Evaluation - Conduct investigation of complex problem (PO4)

(5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Demonstrated superior ability to Demonstrated adequate ability to Demonstrated some ability to
Execution of conduct experiments. conduct experiments. conduct experiments.
5 5 5 40
Procedures
Collected all the appropriate data. Collected most of the needed data. Collected some meaningful
(8)
data.
Results and discussion well focused Missed some important points. Analyzed only the most basic
Focus of Results and
points. 5 5 5 20
Discussion
(4)
Interpretation of Insightful, supported conclusions and Reasonable conclusions reached based Deficiencies in support for
recommendations. on achieved results. stated conclusions. 4.5 4.5 4.5 36
Results
(8)
Total Marks 96
Project Evaluation - Modern Tool Usage (PO5)

F1 F2 Avg.
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Selection and use of Clear evidence of ability to select Some evidence of ability to select Little evidence of ability to select
appropriate modern appropriate tools, techniques and appropriate tools, techniques and appropriate tools,
tools, skills and skills to effectively solve problems skills to solve problems or design techniques and skills to solve 5 5 5 40
techniques or design a system a system problems or design
(8) a system
Clear evidence of ability to correctly Some evidence of ability to correctly Little evidence of ability to
Application of tools, apply tools, techniques and skills to apply tools, techniques correctly apply tools, techniques
5 5 5 30
techniques and skills (6) effectively solve problems or design and skills to effectively solve and skills to effectively solve
a system problems or design a system problems or design a system
Analyzing the results Clear evidence of correct Some evidence of correct conclusion of Little evidence of correct
gained from the tools conclusion of results gained from results gained from the tool conclusion of results gained from 4.1 4.1 4.1 25
(6) the tool the tool
Total Marks 95
Project Evaluation - Engineer and Society (PO6)

F1 F2 Avg (avg*Wt
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) )
Complete understanding of public Reasonable understanding of public Deficiencies in understanding
Public Interest & interest and societal impact. interest and societal impact. public interest and/or societal 5 5 5 30
Societal Impact (6) impact.
Complete understanding of health and Reasonable understanding of health and Deficiencies in addressing health
Safety & Health safety issues leading to sound and safety issues. Mostly effective in and safety issues leading to an
5 5 5 40
Issues (8) supported results. achieving supported results. unsupported and/or infeasible
result.
Complete understanding of legal Reasonable understanding of legal No proper understanding of legal
Legal Issues (6) issues related to the project issues related to the project issues related to the project 4 4 4 24
Total Marks 94
Project Evaluation - Environment and sustainability (PO7)

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Complete understanding of Reasonable understanding of Environmental aspects are addressed
Environmental environmental aspects. Effective in environmental aspects. Mostly effective ineffectively with little or no effect on
Aspects addressing environmental issues in addressing environmental issues. end results. 5 5 5 50
(10) leading to a better result.
Complete understanding and Reasonable understanding and No proper understanding of

Sustainability demonstrate the knowledge of, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and sustainable development 4.4 4.8 4.6 46
(10) need for sustainable development need for sustainable development
Total Marks 96
Project Evaluation - Ethics (PO8)

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Identifies the ethical issues associated Identifies most of the ethical issues associated with Fails to recognize key
with the project and discusses these project, but misses some; discussion of the issues issues or the discussion is
Ethical Issues 5 5 5 40
(8) issues thoroughly in the text is not completely thorough superficial
Demonstrates ethical behavior among Does not model ethical behavior among peers and Student has been caught
Behavior peers and faculty faculty cheating or plagiarizing the 5 5 5 40
(8) work of others
Takes personal responsibility for Does not recognize the need to take personal Blames others for own
Responsibility his/her actions responsibility for his/her actions issues and problems 4 4 4 16
(4)
Total Marks 96
Project Evaluation - Individual & Team Work (PO9)
(Mandatory for evaluation of all projects) (Preferably for Final Review)

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
On time at all meetings Sometimes late at meetings. Frequently absent.
Attendance (5) 2 2 2 10
Plays actively the assigned roles, takes Plays own role appropriately and Ineffective and blames others for
Participation (5) on extra work, assists others, takes the expects others to play theirs. own issues and problems 1 1 1 5
lead
Cooperates with others (outside of the Occasionally works as a loner or Does not contribute to group work
discipline) interacts to a minor extent with extra- at all or submits own work as the
Cooperation (5)
disciplinary team members group's 1 1 1 5
Utilizes technical strengths of each team Some leadership, planning and Deficiencies in leadership,
member to full advantage leading to interaction is evident. cooperation and/or interaction.
Teamwork (5)
productive interaction. End result may suffer to some
0.8 0.8 0.8 4
degree.
Total Marks 24
SHASHI KUMAR B J
UMESH S

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
lead
Cooperation (5)
Teamwork (5)
4 4 4 20
degree.
Total Marks 95

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
lead
Cooperation (5)
Teamwork (5)
4 4 4 20
degree.
Total Marks 95
YASHWANTH H
Project Evaluation - Communication (Written) (PO10 a)

SHASHI KUMAR B J
F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Materials are organized in logical Materials are organized in logical sequences Poor organization: no
sequences with headings, sub-headings with headings, sub-headings and paragraphs, structures such as sub-
Organization and paragraphs, making it easy for the but some sections and sub-sections are not headings and paragraph, and
(8) reader to go through and understand. clearly identified, and some paragraphs no sequential flow of materials
1 1 1 8
combine multiple thoughts. and thoughts.
Accurate and proper use of figures, Proper use of figures, tables and captions, Inappropriate use of figures,
Format/ tables and captions, references and references and bibliography, and appendices tables and captions,
Style bibliography, and appendices. with minor error. references and bibliography, 2 2 2 8
(4) and appendices with major
errors.
Content Demonstration of full knowledge of the At ease with content and able to elaborate and Uncomfortable with content.
subject with explanations and explain to some degree. Only basic concepts are
& Knowledge 1 1 1 6
(6) elaboration demonstrated and interpreted.
Reference section complete and Minor inadequacies in references. Inadequate list of references
References comprehensive. Consistent referencing system. or references in text.
(2) Consistent and logical referencing Inconsistent or illogical
1 1 1 2
system. referencing system.
Total Marks 24
Project Evaluation - Communication (Oral) for (PO10b)
(Mandatory for evaluation of all projects) (Preferably for ALL Reviews)

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
All information is presented in a Most information is presented in Difficult to follow presentation due to
Organization
& Structure (4)
logical, interesting and novel logical order which is easy to follow erratic topical shifts and jumps. 2 2 2 8
sequence, which is easily followed.
Demonstration of full knowledge of At ease with content and able to Uncomfortable with information.
Content & the subject with explanations and elaborate and explain to some Capable only of answering rudimentary
Knowledge (4)
1 1 1 4
elaboration. degree. questions.
Appearance (2) Neat and professional. Casual but appropriate. Inappropriate 1 1 1 2

Effective and well organized delivery. Delivery with minor error, but can be Poor delivery, difficult to follow and
Delivery (3)
followed and understood. understand.
1 1 1 3
Uses effective eye contact and voice Has some difficulty with eye contact Has major difficulties with eye contact
projection, speaks comfortably and and voice projection, occasionally and voice projection, blocks the screen
Features (2) smoothly, does not block visual blocks screen and shows and reads from it. Displays most of the 1 1 1 2
aides. nervousness. times signs of nervousness.
Visual aides (2) Uses visual aides effectively. Uses visual aides with minor error. Uses visual aides poorly 1 1 1 2
Listening to and Carefully listens to questions and Listens to questions and responds Misunderstands questions and provides
answering responds appropriately. with minor error. wrong answers. 1 1 1 3
questions (3)
Total Marks 24
SHASHI KUMAR B J

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
5 5 5 40
errors.
& Knowledge 4 4 4 24
5 5 5 10
Total Marks 94
UMESH S

UMESH S

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Organization
& Structure (4)
logical, interesting and novel logical order which is easy to follow erratic topical shifts and jumps. 4 5 4 16
Knowledge (4)
5 5 5 20

Delivery (3)
5 4 5 15
answering responds appropriately. with minor error. wrong answers. 4.3 4.3 4.3 13
questions (3)
Total Marks 94
YASHWANTH H

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
5 5 5 40
errors.
& Knowledge 4 4 4 24
5 5 5 10
Total Marks 94

YASHWANTH H

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Organization
& Structure (4)
logical, interesting and novel logical order which is easy to follow erratic topical shifts and jumps. 4 5 4.5 18
Knowledge (4)
5 5 5 20

Delivery (3)
5 4 4.5 13.5
answering responds appropriately. with minor error. wrong answers. 3 3 3 9
questions (3)
Total Marks 94
Project Evaluation - Project Management & Finance (PO11)


F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Project’s
Goals Goals for the project are clearly described and thoroughly Project’s purpose is stated and some
identification (5) documented evidence of need is provided.
purpose is 4 4 4 20
unclear
Moderate clarity on defined Tasks are not
Task
Breakdown (4)
Tasks are clearly defined, assigned and owns responsibility assignments but conflict of defined or 5 5 5 20
responsibilities assigned
Time
management (5)
Completes the task assigned within time Completes the task with an extensionsTimeline not met 5 5 5 25
Applies/use resources efficiently; uses a system of checks Not able to

Identifies resources but not clear on
Resources (4) and balances for continual management of all available
resource utilization
identify 5 5 5 20
resources. resources
Proposes an
Budget (2) Proposes an optimal budget Proposes a budget which not optimal incomplete 5 5 5 10
budget
Total Marks 95
Project Evaluation - Life Long Learning (PO12)

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Fully aware of external sources of material. Reasonable awareness and use of Some evidence of efforts to
Effective use of supplementary resources. external resources. locate and use external
Actively seeks learning opportunities (reading, Reasonable willingness to participate in resources.
self-study, extra-curricular activities). Excellent learning activities and take risks. Some willingness to
Need for Life- ability to locate and use library and Internet Adequate ability to locate and use library participate in learning
Long Learning resources. Seeks opportunities to learn new and Internet resources. Shows activities and take risks. 4.8 4.8 4.8 96
(20) material, e.g. software packages reasonable attempt to, e.g. learn new Some ability to use
software packages library/internet sources and
e.g. new software
packages.
Total Marks 96
GENERATE RUBRICS FOR PSOs

Project Evaluation – Analyze Design and Implement Emerging Electronics and Communication Systems Using Devices,
Subsystems and Networking. (PSO1).
(Preferably for Second Review)

F1 F2 Avg.
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Effective use of emerging Moderate use of emerging No use of emerging

electronics and electronics and electronics and
Analyze and Design (10) communication systems communication systems communication systems 5 4.6 4.8 48
using devices, subsystems using devices, subsystems using devices, subsystems
and Networking and Networking and Networking
Clear evidence of correct Some evidence of correct Little evidence of correct

implementation from the tool conclusion of conclusion of
Implement (10)
implementation gained implementation gained from
5 5 5 50
from the tool the tool
Total Marks 98
Final Review)

F1 F2 Avg.
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Effective use of emerging Moderate use of emerging No use of emerging

electronics and electronics and electronics and
Analyze and Design (10) communication systems communication systems communication systems 5 4.6 4.8 48
using devices, subsystems using devices, subsystems using devices, subsystems
and Networking and Networking and Networking
Clear evidence of correct Some evidence of correct Little evidence of correct

implementation from the tool conclusion of conclusion of
Implement (10)
implementation gained implementation gained from
5 5 5 50
from the tool the tool
Total Marks 98
Project Evaluation – Exhibit technical skills necessary to choose careers in the Design, Implement and Testing, Management
and Operation of Electronics and Communication Circuits and Systems (PSO2).

F1 F2 Avg
(Weightage) (5 - 4) (3 - 2) (1) (avg*Wt)
Fully aware and use of Reasonable awareness and use of external Some evidence of efforts to
external resources. resources. use external resources.
Effective use of supplementary Reasonable willingness to participate in learning Some willingness to
resources. activities.. Adequate ability to use library and Internet participate in learning
Actively seeks learning resources. Shows reasonable attempt to learn new activities and take risks.
Testing tools, e.g. learn new software packages Some ability to use
opportunities (reading, self-
Management and study, extra-curricular library/internet sources and 4.8 4.8 4.8 96
operation (20) activities) e.g. new software
Excellent ability to use library packages.
and Internet resources.
Seeks opportunities to learn
new tools, e.g. software
packages
Total Marks 96
Consolidated Project Evaluation Sheet
Average
USN Name PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2 (Total
Marks)
SHASHI
1GA14EC KUMAR 96 96 96 96 95 94 96 96 24 24 95 96 98 96 85
114
1GA14EC
UMESH S 96 96 96 96 95 94 96 96 95 94 95 96 98 96 96
142
1GA14EC YASHWANTH
96 96 96 96 95 94 96 96 95 94 95 96 98 96 96
159 H
96 96 96 96 95 94 96 96 71 71 95 96 98 96
PO Mapping Strength 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 2 2
PO Attainment
96 96 96 64 63 63 64 96 71 47 63 32 65 64
[(Avg*Strength)/3]
Academic Year 2017-18 Department ECE

Title of Project Fault Distance Locator in Underground Guide SUMALATHA E
cable using Arduino
Project Evaluation - Individual

Name: SHASHI KUMAR
USN: 1GA14EC114
Project Evaluation
Sl. No. Review PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10(a) PO10(b) PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
1 First 95 94 96 90 95
2 Second 93 90 92
3 Final 96 96 96 95 96 24 24 24 96 98 96
4 Average of Individual POs 96 95 94 96 95 94 96 96 24 24 68 95 96 93 96
Total Marks = Average of all POs = 85 96 95 94 96 95 94 96 96 24 46 95 96 93 96
Name & Signature of Guide Name & Signature of Group In-charge Name & Signature of HOD
Name: UMESH S USN: 1GA14EC142
Project Evaluation
1 First 95 94 96 94 95
2 Second 93 94 92
3 Final 96 96 96 95 96 95 94 94 96 98 96
Name: YASHWANTH H USN: 1GA14EC159
Project Evaluation
1 First 95 96 93 94 95
2 Second 93 94 92
3 Final 96 96 96 95 96 95 94 94 96 98 96

Rubrics For Project Evaluation

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Rubrics For Project Evaluation

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

GLOBAL ACADEMY OF TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU

Rubrics for Project Evaluation

RUBRICS FOR PROJECT

Fault Distance Locator in

Project Evaluation (First Review)

Name & Signature of Examiner Name & Signature of Guide

Name & Signature of Examiner Name & Signature of Guide

Project Evaluation (Final Review)

Name & Signature of Examiner Name & Signature of Guide

Project Evaluation - Engineering Knowledge (PO1)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Critical selection and Effective application of Deficiencies in proper

Engineering Critical selection and Effective application of Deficiencies in proper

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Complete understanding and Reasonable understanding and No proper understanding of

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Project Evaluation - Individual & Team Work (PO9)

Project Evaluation - Communication (Written) (PO10 a)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Appearance (2) Neat and professional. Casual but appropriate. Inappropriate 1 1 1 2

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Project Evaluation - Communication (Oral) for (PO10b)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Appearance (2) Neat and professional. Casual but appropriate. Inappropriate 3 1 5 10

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Project Evaluation - Communication (Oral) for (PO10b)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Appearance (2) Neat and professional. Casual but appropriate. Inappropriate 3 1 2 4

Project Evaluation - Project Management & Finance (PO11)

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Applies/use resources efficiently; uses a system of checks Not able to

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

GENERATE RUBRICS FOR PSOs

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Effective use of emerging Moderate use of emerging No use of emerging

Clear evidence of correct Some evidence of correct Little evidence of correct

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Effective use of emerging Moderate use of emerging No use of emerging

Clear evidence of correct Some evidence of correct Little evidence of correct

Performance Exceptional Acceptable Marginal Marks

Academic Year 2017-18 Department ECE

Project Evaluation - Individual

Total Marks = Average of all POs = 85 96 95 94 96 95 94 96 96 24 46 95 96 93 96

Name: UMESH S USN: 1GA14EC142

Total Marks = Average of all POs = 96 96 95 95 96 95 94 96 96 95 94 95 96 94 96

Total Marks = Average of all POs = 96 96 95 95 96 95 96 93 96 95 94 95 96 94 96

Вам также может понравиться