Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Subject Outline
Subject Information
Session 1, 2019
Offshore campus, INTI INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE SUBANG
Lecture Information:
will be confirmed later
Teaching Staff
Teaching Role Coordinator, Lecturer and Tutor
Name Sanmugam Annamalah
Telephone
Email Sanmugam_1@yahoo.com
Room
Consultation Times To be confirmed later
Is your question addressed elsewhere (e.g. in this subject outline or, where applicable, on the subject's
eLearning site)?
Is it something that is better discussed in person or by telephone? This may be the case if your query
requires a lengthy response or a dialogue in order to address. If so, see consultation times above and/or
schedule an appointment.
Are you addressing your request to the most appropriate person?
Specific email title/ header to enable easy identification of subject related/ student emails
Identify the subject code of the subject you are enquiring about (as your teacher may be involved in
more than one subject) in the email header. Add a brief, specific header after the subject code where
appropriate
Professional courtesy
Address your teacher appropriately by name (and formal title if you do not yet know them).
Use full words (avoid 'text-speak' abbreviations), correct grammar and correct spelling.
Be respectful and courteous.
Academics will normally respond within 1-2 business days. If the matter is urgent, you may wish to
telephone the teaching staff whose contact details are given in this subject outline or contacting the
School.
Please ensure that you include your full name and identify your seminar or tutorial group in your email
so that your teachers know who they are communicating with and can follow-up personally where
appropriate.
Copyright
Commonwealth of Australia
The original material prepared for this guide is covered by copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of
private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by
any process without written permission.
1. Identify the important determinants of real output, interest rates, exchange rates, prices and
employment for a small open economy.
2. Analyse monetary and fiscal policies and be able to evaluate their effectiveness.
3. Analyse the problems associated with inflation and unemployment.
4. Understand explanations of economic growth and policy prescriptions.
Subject Description
This subject analyses the major factors which determine economic behaviour in the aggregate and evaluate how
alternative macroeconomic policies may improve economic performance. In doing so the course examines the
major determinants of aggregate demand equilibrium, namely consumption and investment demands,
international factors, money and interest. Monetary and fiscal policies are examined using this analytic structure
to determine the effectiveness of these policies for an open economy. Aggregate supply equilibrium is analysed
in terms of wages, prices and employment. The problems of inflation and employment are also considered along
with possible wages policies. Longer term explanations of economic growth and associated policy prescriptions
are also considered.
Major Text(s)
Key References
Blanchard, O. and Sheen, J., (2013), Macroeconomics: Australasian Edition, 4th ed. Melbourne: Pearson
Australia.
Dornbusch, R., Bodman, P., Fischer, S. and Startz, R. (2013), Macroeconomics: Australasian Edition. 3rd ed.
Sydney: McGraw Hill Australia
Mishkin, F.S. (2014), Macroeconimcs: Policy and Practice - Global Edition. 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson
Lecture Times *
To be confirmed later
Lecture Program *
Technological Progress
10 Blanchard, Chapters 12
and Growth
The Phillips Curve, the Natural
11 Blanchard, Chapters 8
Rate of Unemployment
12 Big Issue: Inflation Blanchard, Chapters 23
Revision and Review Lecture (Comments and
13 Relevant notes
Feedback)
Revision
Final examination
* The above times and program may be subject to change. Students will be notified of any change via SOLS.
Tutorial/Seminar/Workshop Program
Attendance Requirements
The Faculty expects all students to attend lectures and tutorials as we strongly believe that students who attend
lectures and tutorials usually learn more and perform better in assignments and examinations.
The School is committed to continual improvement in teaching and learning. In assessing teaching and learning
practices in a subject, the School takes into consideration student feedback from many sources. These sources
include direct student feedback to tutors and lecturers, feedback through Student Services and Business Central,
and responses to the Subject and Course Evaluation Surveys. These important student responses, along with
University policies and Faculty practices inform ongoing changes to subjects and courses. This information is
also used to inform systemic comprehensive reviews of subjects and courses.
While every effort is made to keep the subject database current, students may find that occasionally, the
assessment information in the subject outline differs from the information on the subject database. In such
instances, the Subject Coordinator will make appropriate announcements in the first class of the session.
In extraordinary circumstances the provisions stipulated in this Subject Outline may require amendment after
the Subject Outline has been distributed. All students enrolled in the subject must be notified and have the
opportunity to provide feedback in relation to the proposed amendment, prior to the amendment being finalised.
Section B: Assessment
Assessment Summary
Students will be required to write out their answer to the selected question in
the selected tutorial. Student's answers will be assessed according to their
demonstrated:
Students will not be allowed to copy the answer to the question from notes.
Length 12-15 minutes
Weighting 10%
Assessment Due To Be Announced
Type of Collaboration Individual assessment
Style and format Problem solving and short answer questions selected from the assigned
Length 3 hours
Weighting 50%
Assessment Due To Be Announced
Type of Collaboration Individual assessment
Style and format Students are required to answer essay/problem solving questions.
Material presented in lectures and tutorials in Weeks 6 to 13 will be tested.
The date will be confirmed during the course of the subject and published on
SOL 3 to 4 weeks before the examination period.
The UOW Grade Descriptors are general statements that communicate what our grades represent, in terms of
standards of performance, and provide a frame of reference to ensure that assessment practice across the
University is appropriate, consistent and fair. Grade Descriptors are expressed in general terms so that they are
applicable to a broad range of disciplines. For more information on the UOW grade descriptors see:
https://www.uow.edu.au/curriculum-transformation/aqc/uowgradedescriptors/index.html
To be eligible to pass this subject, students must complete all assessment tasks for this subject. In addition, you
must achieve a total mark of 50% or over and obtain a minimum of 50% in the final examination or major piece
of assessment (where there is no final exam). Students who do not meet these minimum performance level
requirements will be given a Fail grade (F) on their Academic Transcript, in accordance with the General
Course Rules.
Where a student gains a mark of 50 or greater and does not meet the specified level in an assessment task
required to pass the subject a Technical Fail (TF) grade will be given. Where a Technical Fail is given the
following applies:
Failure to complete all assessment tasks will normally result in failure of the entire subject, other marks
notwithstanding.
Students should note that UOW policy equates 1 credit point with 2 hours of study per week that includes
lectures and tutorials/workshops/practical. For example, in a 6 credit point subject, a total of 12 hours of study
per week is expected.
Students who fail a subject may be eligible for a supplementary exam depending on the final mark obtained for
the subject and the final exam mark, or for other extenuating circumstances as approved by the relevant Head of
School and Faculty Assessment Committee in line with University of Wollongong and Faculty of Business
guidelines. Students who believe they may be eligible, and who have not already been advised accordingly,
should consult their lecturer or subject coordinator.
Collaboration between students during the preparation of subject assessment tasks or case studies is only
permitted dependent upon the category of assessment task declared by the subject coordinator and as printed in
the Subject Outline.
Type 1 - Take home exams: No collaboration of any kind is permitted between students or anyone else during
formation and preparation of the contents of the student submission.
Type 2 - Group work: Collaboration is permitted between students in the same group but not with students in
other groups.
Type 3 - Individual assessment: Collaboration is permitted between students only in the form of general
discussion pertaining to relevant concepts or potential issues to be dealt with in completing the assessment.
However, collaboration must not proceed to the point where it contributes directly to the final submission
produced by the student. Joint planning of the actual contents of a student's submission is not permitted. Where
the assessment requires formulation of a set of recommendations, a problem solution, or a specific course of
action, collaboration is not permitted during their formulation. Needless to say, collaboration is not permitted
during the actual preparation and writing of the student submission.
Type 4 - Open assessment: Collaboration with other students is permitted, subject to the normal rules governing
plagiarism. That is, direct use of ideas contributed by others must be acknowledged.
Type 5 - Individual assessment and group work: Collaboration is permitted with other members of your group,
but not with other groups for the group work component. No collaboration is permitted with other members of
your group for the individual component.
Assessed work must be handed in by the date and time listed under each assessment task. All assessment tasks
must represent the enrolled student's own ORIGINAL work and must not have been previously submitted for
assessment in any formal course of study.
If a student does not attend a required in-session test/examination, and also fails to produce satisfactory medical
or other reasons for this (See Section C: General Advice for Students), a deferred examination will NOT be
offered, and the student may be deemed to have failed the subject, other marks notwithstanding.
Students are required to submit original work which will provide a basis for the certification of competence in
this subject. These assessments may include: examinations, tests, take-home examinations, quizzes,
assignments, essays, laboratory reports, demonstrations, folio of creative works, performances, tutorial
presentation and participation.
Extensions
Extensions of time to submit material for assessment can only be requested in advance of the due date for an
assessment activity through the Academic Consideration process on SOLS. For more information, please refer
to the Student Academic Consideration Policy.
A Faculty assignment cover sheet must be attached to each piece of written assessment task. Students should
ensure they receive a receipt of submission and retain this for proof of submission.
Students may not e-mail, post or fax assessment tasks unless specifically requested by or with the prior approval
of the subject coordinator.
Assessed work submitted late will be penalised by the deduction of 10 percent of the maximum possible mark
for that assessment per working day or part thereof. The operation of this rule will not result in a negative mark
being carried forward.
This penalty for late submission may be waived upon presentation of a medical certificate of illness for a
relevant period, or upon evidence of untoward or approved circumstances that fall under the Student Academic
Consideration Policy (See Section C: General Advice for Students).
Collection
Assessment items will normally be returned to students within three (3) weeks of the due date. Assessment tasks
which are relevant to the final examination for the subject will be marked and available for collection prior to
the study week before the final examination.
The Faculty of Business will retain appropriate records in line with the State Records Act 1998 (NSW), other
relevant legislation, standards and University of Wollongong policies.
Data on student performance and engagement (such as Moodle and University Library usage, task marks, use of
SOLS) will be available to the Subject Coordinator to assist in analysing student engagement, and to identify
and recommend support to students who may be at risk of failure. If you have questions about the kinds of data
the University uses, how we collect it, and how we protect your privacy in the use of this data, please refer to
https://www.uow.edu.au/dvca/bala/analytics/index.html
Scaling
Marks awarded for any assessment task or part of any assessment task, including an examination may be subject
to scaling at the end of the session. Marks will be scaled only when unpredicted circumstances occur and in
order to ensure fairness of marking across groups of students. The method of scaling will depend on the type of
scaling required by the circumstances. When scaling is deemed necessary, it will follow a detailed consideration
by the Unit Assessment Committee and/or the Faculty Assessment Committee of the marks of the group of
students concerned. Scaling will not affect any individual student's rank order within their cohort.
Supplementary Assessment
Supplementary assessment may be offered to students whose performance in this subject is close to that required
to pass the subject, and are otherwise identified as meriting an offer of a supplementary assessment. The Subject
Coordinator will determine the precise form of supplementary assessment at the time the offer of a
supplementary is made. In some circumstances you may be offered a supplementary exam.
In accordance with the Coursework Student Academic Complaints Policy, a student may request an explanation
of a mark for an assessment task or a final grade for a subject consistent with the student's right to appropriate
and useful feedback on their performance in an assessment task.
The University of Wollongong is committed to the quality assurance and quality enhancement of assessment.
The University will meet its legislative and regulatory obligations, to ensure consistent and appropriate
assessment through course management and coordination, including assessment quality assurance procedures.
An Assessment Quality Cycle is used to describe quality assurance at the points of assessment design,
assessment delivery, the declaration of marks and grades, and review and improvement activities.
The Faculty of Business ensures each degree has specified course learning outcomes which assure that students
attain knowledge, skills and competencies at the appropriate qualification level. These course learning outcomes
align with the curriculum. These are evaluated through existing assessment tasks within subjects.
The Faculty uses Assurance of Learning (AOL) to assess how students meet the specified course learning
outcomes and how well our graduates have achieved these. AOL collects and analyses student results data to
continuously improve degrees offered by the Faculty which leads to improved student learning.
The University's Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Policy, faculty handbooks and subject guides clearly set out
the University's expectation that students submit only their own original work for assessment and avoid
plagiarising the work of others or cheating. Re-using any of your own work (either in part or in full) which you
have submitted previously for assessment is not permitted without appropriate acknowledgement. Plagiarism
can be detected and has led to students being expelled from the University.
The use by students of any website that provides access to essays or other assessment items (sometimes
marketed as 'resources'), is extremely unwise. Students who provide an assessment item (or provide access to an
assessment item) to others, either directly or indirectly (for example by uploading an assessment item to a
website) are considered by the university to be intentionally or recklessly helping other students to cheat.
Uploading an assessment task, subject outline or other course materials without express permission of the
University is considered academic misconduct and students place themselves at risk of being expelled from the
University.
Plagiarism Prevention
The Faculty of Business has introduced an e-learning module which aims to orientate you with the knowledge
and resources to:
The online module is openly available for use by students at any stage in their degree. You are strongly
encouraged to use the module to help in assessing the academic integrity of your written work. The module can
be accessed via https://moodle.uowplatform.edu.au/course/view.php?id=5679
Referencing
At university it is necessary to acknowledge the sources of information and ideas that you have incorporated in
your assessment tasks. Failure to do this thoroughly may result in accusations of plagiarism: this is the academic
equivalent of stealing (because by not acknowledging someone else's work, you are presenting it as your own).
Plagiarism is taken very seriously by the University and may result in expulsion from the University.
Referencing is not only about acknowledging other people's work; accurate referencing and lists of references
are beneficial when researching a topic as they allow the reader to follow up information and read further in the
area. In a sense, references provide readers with clues to help them explore different avenues of a topic. This
aspect of referencing will become more valuable to you as you progress in your studies.
There is a correct procedure that must be followed when referencing and using footnotes. Not complying with
these set techniques and format will most likely result in loss of marks. When writing an essay it is easiest to
reference as you go, making sure you are writing down all relevant information. This will save hours trying to
find the source again in the library.
The Faculty of Business uses the Harvard system of referencing. This system makes use of short references
within the body of the text. It is supplemented by a detailed list of references at the end of the text, which
provides all the information necessary to find the source material. In-text references include the author and year
of publication, and where necessary the page number(s).
It is the responsibility of students to ensure that they are familiar with the Harvard system of referencing and
that they use it accurately in all written work submitted.
It is necessary for students to reference all sources used in their written work, including file transfer protocol
sites, worldwide web sites, telnet sites, synchronous communications (MOOs, MUDs, IRC, etc.) GOPHER
sites, and email, Listserv and Newsgroup citations.
It is the responsibility of students to ensure that they are familiar with the accepted Faculty of Business practice
for referencing electronic material and that they use it accurately in all written work submitted.