Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.7, No.

2, February 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

Fuzzy Inventroy Model for Small Scale Retailers With


Local Advertisements
W.Ritha and K.Jayanthi
Department of Mathematics,
Holy Cross College(Autonomous),
Tiruchirappalli-620002,India.

Abstract- In this paper, we have developed an inventory model for small scale retailer with local advertisements
under fuzzy environment. In reality, it is seen that we cannot define all parameters precisely due to imprecision or
uncertainty in the environment. So we have defined the inventory parameters such as demand, holding cost ,
Initialization cost and advertising cost as trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. The signed distance method has been used for
defuzzification. To illustrate the proposed model a numerical example and sensitivity analysis with respect to
different associated parameter has been presented.

Keywords: Fuzzy inventory model, Trapezoidal Fuzzy number, Defuzzification, Advertising cost.

1. INTRODUCTION
The customers have wide open choice in billboards, handbills, television which are the
selecting their enviable supplier. To keep hold of the traditional mediums, followed by web and email, the
consumers the retailer handles various tactics such as
discount offer, concession in cost, reduction of price recent mediums of advertising are used commonly
and also to withstand the growth of the competitors due to its benefits and cost effectiveness.
the firms are accelerated to produce distinct products In this paper, we convert the inventory model
bearing several attractive traits such as green into fuzzy inventory model. The holding cost,
products, products with eco-friendly packaging, demand, initialization cost, advertising cost are
quality improved products which are welcomed by assumed to be the trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. For
the consumers. To make these offers fortunate to defuzzification of the total cost function, signed
disseminate and to propagate the product, distance method are used. The retailer chooses
communications have to be done to the customers at handbills and television as the mode of advertising
the right time in the right manner. One such means is and the optimal quantity is determined for three
Advertising, which is becoming more important different cases.
every day in this technological era.
Advertising has an extreme importance in today’s 2. Definitions:
society, and business companies invest constantly 2.1 Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number:
growing parts of their budgets in engineering ways to The fuzzy number A = (a1, a2, a3, a4),
attract higher number of products and services they where a1 < a2< a3 <a4 and defined on R is called the
offer. (Antonio et al., 2009) Advertising ,a one way trapezoidal fuzzy number, if the membership function
communication about a product or organization that is given by
is paid by a marketer to persuade an audience 0 : x  a1orx  a4
(readers, listeners and viewers) to a commercial  (x  a )
offering to take some action with respect to products,  1
: a  x  a2
ideas, or services. It is a powerful educational tool  (a2  a1 ) 1

capable of reaching and motivating the customers and  A ( x)  1: a2  x  a3
drives consumer behaviour for commercial purpose.  (x  a )
Virtually any medium can be used for advertising.  4
: a3  x  a4
Commercial advertising media can include wall  (a3  a4 )
paintings, billboards, street furniture components, 

printed flyers and rack cards, magazines, newspapers,
radio, cinema, television, web banners, mobile
2.2 Signed distance method :
telephone, web popup. Among these mediums

346
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.7, No.2, February 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

Let A = (a,b,c,d) be a trapezoidal fuzzy Case i: The motive of advertising is to familiarize the
product to the customers. A market segment consists
number, then the signed distance method of A is
1 of a large identifiable group within a market with
defined as d( A , 0) = ½  [A
0
L ( )  AR ( )]d similar wants, purchasing power, geographical
location, buying attitudes. Thus the retailers telecast
where A = [AL(α) , AR(α)] = [ a+(b-a)α , d-(d-c)α ] advertisements according to their desirable taste to
make the product reach the customers. Let us
, α € [0,1] is a α-cut of fuzzy set A which is a close consider the case where the retailer wishes to
interval. d ( A ,0) = ( a + b + c + d ) / 4. advertise via local channels. EOQ cost per cycle
hQ 2
3. Assumptions and Notations. C(Q) = A +cQ + Advertisement cost per cycle
2D
The model is developed on the following A(Q) = I +ψ + γ + nt The total cost per unit time is σ
assumptions and notations. AD hQ ( I      nt ) D
(Q) =  cD   The optimal
3.1. Assumptions Q 2 Q
i) Demand rate is uniform 2 D( A  I      nt )
ii) Lead time is zero. solution is Q =
h
iii) the initialization cost of casting advertisement is
Case ii : Consider the situation where the retailer
the amount of money spent by the retailer to
decides to advertise via handbills. He himself
get in connection with the advertising agency, which
cannot distribute all the bills, so he hires some
is assumed to be constant irrespective of the
persons to carry out the work of distributing the hand
medium.
bills to the local regions. EOQ cost per cycle C(Q)
3.2 Notations hQ 2
= A +cQ + Advertisement cost per cycle A(Q)
D demand 2D
A order cost = I + f+ v+ nz The total cost per unit time is σ (Q) =
c unit purchase cost AD hQ ( I  f  v  nz ) D
h holding cost per unit per time  cD   The optimal
Q 2 Q
I initialization cost
Ψ fixed cost per advertisement is telecast 2 D( A  I  f  v  nz )
solution is Q =
γ variable cost per advertisement h
n number of times the advertisement is telecast Case iii: In this case the handbills are distributed to
t cost of telecasting the advertisement once distant areas within the local regions.
f1 fixed cost of producing a handbill. EOQ cost per cycle C(Q) = A + cQ +
v variable cost of producing a handbill hQ 2
N number of employees involved in distribution of Advertisement cost per cycle A(Q) = I + f + v+
handbills 2D
nz+ a + db. The total cost per unit time is σ (Q) =
z cost per employee
AD hQ ( I  f  v  nz  a  db) D
d distance to be travelled(in km)  cD   The optimal
a fixed cost per trip Q 2 Q
b variable cost per trip 2 D( A  I  f  v  nz  a  db)
solution is Q =
4. Mathematical Model h
4.1. Crisp Model
In this context, we have considered three modes of 4.2 Fuzzy Model: We consider the model in fuzzy
advertising cost of seller environment. Due to uncertainity, it is not easy to
define all parameters exactly.
i) The retailer wished to advertise via local
channels Case i: Let D = (D1, D2. D3, D4 ), h = (h1 , h2 ,h3,
ii) To distribute hand bills to the people by hiring h4),  = (γ1 ,γ2 , γ3, γ4), I = (I1 , I2 ,I3,I4), V =
some persons to carry out the work.
(v1,v2,v3,v4) b = (b1 , b2, b3, b4) are trapezoidal
iii) To distribute hand bills to distant areas within
fuzzy numbers. The total variable cost per unit time
the local regions.

347
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.7, No.2, February 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

in fuzzy sense is given by  (Q ) = To minimize total cost function per unit time, the
optimal value can be obtained by solving the
AD hQ ( I     nt ) D
 cD   We defuzzify the d ds (Q) d 2 ds (Q)
Q 2 Q following equations.  0and 0
dQ dQ 2
total cost  (Q ) by using signed distance method then,
1 ¼ {(-1/ Q2)[A(D1+D2+D3+D4)+
 (Q)  [ ds1   ds2   ds3   ds4 ] where σds1(Q) = I1D1+I2D2+I3D3+I4D4+v1D1+v2D2+v3D3+v4D4+(f+nz)
4
( D1+D2+D3+D4)} +1/2 (h1+h2+h3+h4) = 0, and Q* =
AD1 h Q ( I      nt ) D1
 cD1  1  1 1 σds2 (Q) = 2[ A( D1  D2  D3  D4 )  I1 D1  I 2 D2  I3 D3  I 4 D4  v1D1  v2 D2  v3 D3  v4 D4  ( f  nz)( D1  D2  D3  D4 )
Q 2 Q h1  h2  h3  h4

AD2 h Q ( I   2    nt ) D2 Case iii: Let D = (D1, D2. D3, D4 ), h = (h1 , h2


 cD2  2  2 σds3 (Q) =
,h3,h4) ,  = (γ1 ,γ2 , γ3, γ4), I = (I1 , I2 ,I3,I4),
Q 2 Q
AD3 h Q ( I      nt ) D3
 cD3  3  3 3 σds4 (Q) = V =(v1,v2,v3,v4) b = (b1 , b2, b3, b4) are trapezoidal
Q 2 Q fuzzy numbers. The total variable cost per unit time
AD4 h Q ( I   4    nt ) D4 in fuzzy sense is given by
 cD4  4  4 To minimize
Q 2 Q AD hQ ( I  v  f  nz  a  db) D
 (Q ) =  cD  
total cost function per unit time , the optimal value Q 2 Q
can be obtained by solving the following equations.
We defuzzify the total cost  (Q ) by using signed
d ds (Q) d 2 ds (Q)
 0and  0 then, ¼ {(-1/ Q2) 1
dQ dQ 2 distance method  (Q)  [ ds1   ds2   ds3   ds4 ]
4
[A(D1+D2+D3+D4)+I1D1+I2D2+I3D3 +I4D4 + γ1D1 where
+γ2D2+γ3D3+ γ4D4 +(ψ+nt)( D1+D2+D3+D4)} +1/2 AD1 h Q ( I  v  f  nz  a  db1 ) D1
(h1+h2+h3+h4) = 0, and Q* = σds1(Q) =  cD1  1  1 1
2[ A( D1  D2  D3  D4 )  I1 D1  I 2 D2  I3 D3  I 4 D4   1 D1   2 D2   3D3   4 D4  (  nt)( D1  D2  D3  D4)
Q 2 Q
h1  h2  h3  h4 AD2 h Q ( I  v  f  nz  a  db2 ) D2
σds2(Q)=  cD2  2  2 2
Case ii: Let D = (D1, D2. D3, D4 ), h = (h1, h2 ,h3, Q 2 Q
AD3 h Q ( I  v  f  nz  a  db3 ) D3
h4),  = (γ1 ,γ2 , γ3, γ4), I = (I1 , I2 ,I3,I4), V = σds3(Q) =  cD3  3  3 3
Q 2 Q
(v1,v2,v3,v4) b = (b1, b2, b3, b4) are trapezoidal fuzzy AD4 h Q ( I  v  f  nz  a  db4 ) D4
σds4(Q) =  cD4  4  4 4
numbers. The total variable cost per unit time in Q 2 Q
fuzzy sense is given by To minimize total cost function per unit time , the
AD hQ ( I  v  f  nz ) D optimal value can be obtained by solving the
 (Q ) =  cD   We
Q 2 Q d ds (Q) d 2 ds (Q)
following equations.  0and 0
defuzzify the total cost  (Q ) by using signed dQ dQ 2
1 then, ¼ {(-1/ Q2)[A(D1+D2+D3+D4)
distance method  (Q)  [ ds1   ds2   ds3   ds4 ] +I1D1+I2D2+I3D3+I4D4+v1D1+v2D2+v3D3+v4D4+d(b1
4 D1+b2D2+b3D3+b4D4)+ (f+nz+a)( D1+D2+D3+D4)}
where +1/2 (h1+h2+h3+h4)= 0, and Q* =
AD1 h Q ( I  v  f  nz ) D1 2[ A( D1  D2  D3  D4 )  I1 D1  I 2 D2  I 3 D3  I 4 D4  v1 D1  v2 D2  v3 D3  v4 D4  d (b1D1  b2 D2  b3 D3  b4 D4 )  ( f  nz )(D1  D2  D3  D4 )
σds1(Q) =  cD1  1  1 1 σd2 h1  h2  h3  h4
Q 2 Q
5. Numerical Illustration
AD2 h Q ( I  v  f  nz ) D2 We consider the following numerical values
(Q)=  cD2  2  2 2 σds3
Q 2 Q of the parameters in appropriate units to
analyze the model:
AD3 h Q ( I  v  f  nz ) D3
(Q)=  cD3  3  3 3 σds4
Q 2 Q Crisp model:
AD4 h Q ( I  v  f  nz ) D4 A = $100/cycle , h= $5/unit/cycle, D=50000units/yr,
(Q) =  cD4  4  4 4 I = $200 , γ = $150 ,ψ=$250, n=10 ,N= 10 t = 120,
Q 2 Q
z= 200 , f= $150 , v=$190, a= $100 , b= $50 , d= 20
Km Casei:

348
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.7, No.2, February 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

2 D( A  I      nt ) motive the seller looks for advertising. The cost of


Q= advertising must be minimum, but at the same time it
h
= 6164 units must be effective.
Case ii:
CONCLUSION:
2 D( A  I  f  v  nz ) In this paper, a fuzzy EOQ model for small scale
Q=
h retailers with local advertisement using Initialisation
= 7266 units
and advertising costs are studied. The optimum
Case iii: results of fuzzy model were defuzzified using signed
2 D( A  I  f  v  nz  a  db) distance method. This will increase the total profit.
Q= It is concluded that the value of the optimal order
h
= 8648 units
quantity for different cases are much sensitive with
Fuzzy model: respect to the advertisement cost and so the fuzzy
Case i: 5917 units model permits flexibility in the system inputs.
The outcome of this research can be
Case ii: 7267 units
extended in future to the case of advertising through
Case iii: 8655 units internet model.

6. EFFECTS OF ADVERTISEMENTS ON THE REFERENCES:


CUSTOMERS AND SOCIETY [1] Cai, G., Chen, L., Li, J. (2003) Billboard
Advertisements play a major role in creating a strong advertising detection in sport TV In : Proc.
opinion about the product in the minds Internat. Symp. on Signal Processing and its
of the customers. Advertising will only survive and Applications, pp. 537–540.
grow if it focuses on being effective. Advertisements [2] Carter, J.R., Ferrin B.G. (1996) Transportation
will be effective only if it help the advertisers costs and inventory management: Why
(retailers and manufacturers) to reach the goal. All transportation costs matter, Production
advertisers are expecting specific results based on andInventory Management Journal, 37(3) : 58–
their stated objectives which are attained only out of 62.
proper planning, creation and execution. Effective [3] Christine Jasch. (2003) The use of environmental
advertisement‟s characteristics work on two levels. managementaccounting (EMA) for identifying
First one is, the advertisers should satisfy consumer‟s environmental costs. Journal of Cleaner
objectives by engaging them and delivering a Production, 11(6) : 667 –676.
relevant message. The other one is that the [4] Huang, Z., Li, S.X. (2001) Co-op advertising
models in manufacturer–retailer supply chains :
advertisements must achieve the advertiser‟s
A game theory approach. European Journal of
objectives. The ultimate motive of the advertisers is
Operational Research, 135 : 527–544.
to make the customers to buy and keep buying their
[5] Huang, Z., Li, S. X., Mahajan, V. (2002) An
goods and services, so they make use of any one of
analysis of manufacturer–retailer supply chain
the mediums of advertising. Therefore the advertisers
coordination in cooperativeadvertising. Decision
must be cautious in employing the apt advertising
Sciences, 33(3) : pp 469–494.
strategies to acquire customers to make their
[6] Khouja, Robbins (2003) Linking advertising and
expenditure in advertising fruitful.
quantity decisions in the single-period inventory
model, International Journal of Production
7. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Economics, Vol.86(2) : 93–105.
The sensitivity analysis is performed for
[7] Ramalingam, B., Palaniappan, N.,
checking the effectiveness of the EOQ model for
Panchanatham, Palanivel, S. (2006) Measuring
infinite production rate with respect to the
advertisement effectiveness – a neural network
advertisement cost on the optimum order quantity in
approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 31:
fuzzy sense by using signed distance method. The
159–163.
seller scatters his interest in maximizing the profit
[8] T. K. Datta and K. Paul, An inventory system
and in minimizing the cost of purchasing and holding
with stock-dependent, price-sensitive demand
cost. The seller can expand his business circle by
rate, Production Planning & Control, 12(1)
increasing the number of local customers with this
(2001) 13–20.

349
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.7, No.2, February 2019
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Available online at www.ijrat.org

[9] P. Dutta, D. Chakraborty and A. R. Roy, A


single-period inventory model with fuzzy
random variable demand, Mathematical and
Computer Modelling, 41(8-9) (2005)915–922.
[10] S. K. Goyal and B. C. Giri, The production–
inventory problem of a product with time
varying demand, production and deterioration
rates, European Journal of Operational
Research, 147(3) (2003) 549–557.
[11] W. He, H. E. Wei and X. U. Fuyuan, Inventory
model for deteriorating items with time
dependent partial backlogging rate and
inventory-level-dependent demand rate, Journal
of Computer Applications, 33(8) (2013) 2390–
2393.
[12] C. Kao and W. K. Hsu, A single-period
inventory model with fuzzy demand, Computers
& Mathematics with Applications , 43(6-7) (2002)
841–848.
[13] S. Kar, T. K. Roy and M. Maiti, Multi-item
fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items
with finite time-horizon and time-dependent
demand, Yugoslav Journal of Operations
Research. An International Journal dealing with
Theoretical and Computational Aspects of
Operations Research, Systems Science, and
Management Science, 16(2) (2006) 161–176.
[14] D. Khurana, Two warehouse inventory model for
deteriorating items with time dependent demand
under inflation, International Journal of
Computer Applications in Technology, 114(7)
(2015) 34–38.
[15] K. Jaggi, et al., Fuzzy inventory model for
deteriorating items with time-varying demand
and shortages, American Journal of Operational
Research, 2(6) (2013) 81–92.

350

Вам также может понравиться