Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
net/publication/299604479
CITATIONS READS
2 9,160
1 author:
Hossein Farraji
Universiti Sains Malaysia
17 PUBLICATIONS 18 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Novel method for Palm oil mill effluent treatment View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Hossein Farraji on 04 April 2016.
205
Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Available online at http://www.ijsrpub.com/books
©2014 IJSRPUB
School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, University Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
Email: hosseinfarraji@gmail.com
Abstract. Nowadays many technologies are using for treatment of environmental pollutions and phytoremediation as a green
technology is going on to convert to one of the main ecofriendly technologies which scientist using in their researches. Aquatic
media as a fundamental and critical part of human environment have main role in water resources and food chain. In this
chapter we present different aspect and types of phytoremediation in aquatic media purification from metallic elements.
206
Faraji
Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods
2.3. Advantages of aquatic phytoremediation Alkorta et al., 2004; Ghosh and Singh, 2005; Shiyab
et al., 2009; Delmail et al., 2013, Kumar et al., 2013;
These green technologies as an ecofriendly present Nan et al., 2013).
many advantages for decontamination of aquatic (a) Harvested biomass contains hazardous
polluted media comparing other treatment systems pollution; (b) Long time need for effective treatment;
(Ximénez-Embún et al., 2001; Bissen and Frimmel (c) Deep polluted media are limited treating; (d)
2003; Ghosh and Singh, 2005; Kirkham, 2006; Verma Limited to climate growth condition (tropical,
et al., 2007; Olguín and Sánchez-Galván, 2010; subtropical and tempered zoon); (e) Restricted to low
Landmeyer, 2012; Wang and Calderon, 2012; Delmail concentration of polluted site; (f) Harvested biomass
et al., 2013). managing required; (g) Limited hyperaccumulator
(a) Greatly cost effective; (b) species introduced for aquatic media; (h) Leaves fall
Environmentally Compatible, green aesthetically; (c) may cause spread contaminant; (i) Most of
Feasible globally technology (no need to high-tech hyperaccumulator plants have limited roots and slow
equipment or material); (d) Easy maintenance (supply growing; (j) Most of hyperaccumulator species up
and energy) solar powered; (e) In situ and ex situ take only limited elements; (k) Many of
operation available; (f) Inhibiting deployment of hyperaccumulators propagation system is sexual; (l)
contamination to atmosphere or soil by in situ Recycling to soil and water by rain in volatilized
operation; (g) Suitable for shallow depth contaminated pollutions; (m) Possibility of entering contaminated
water to hydrologic control of ground water; (h) biomass to animal and human food chain
Periodic treatment against continued treatments; (i)
Different types of many contaminations can be treated 2.5. Phytovolatilization
in one time; (j) Produce biomass for renewable energy
production; (k) Rapid mass propagation by tissue This kind of phytoremediation involves the utilization
culture available; (l) Almost treatable for all kind of of plants to take up pollutions from contaminated
contaminations (organic, inorganic and radionuclides); media, transforming them into volatile form and
(m) Operable approximately in all media (aquatic, finally transpiring them into the air.
sediment, soil and atmosphere); (n) Broad acceptable phytovolatilization normally occurs in plants for up
pH (2-10) for treatment; (o) Chelating molecules taking water, organic and inorganic compounds so
positively affected phytoremediation; some of contamination can pass through the plant
parts to the leaves and at low concentration ,volatilize
2.4. Disadvantages of aquatic phytoremediation into the atmosphere (Mueller et al., 1999) In a
nutshell, the use of plant species for volatilize
Same as each technology, phytoremediation suffer contaminants from the leaves which can use for soil
from disadvantages which should considered through and sediment pollutions (Mueller et al., 1999) air
applying (Mojiri et al. 2013; Assunção et al., 2003, contaminations (Burken and Schnoor, 1999) and water
207
Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Chapter 7: Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Technologies
pollution (Baeder-Bederski-Anteda, 2003). The plants which applied for Rhizodegradation are
phytovolatilization radionuclides such as Tritium(3H) Hibiscus cannabinus for used lubricating oil (Abioye
from soil (Dushenkov, 2003),significantly up taking et al., 2012), Sorghum bicolor L. for crude oil (Banks
selenium compounds contain dimethyldiselenide and et al., 2003), Broadleaf plantain plant (Plantago
dimethylselenide by Brassica species (Bañuelos et al., major L.) for Imidacloprid (insecticide) in water and
2000) are some sample studies on phytovolatilization. soil (Romeh, 2009), willow (Salix babylonica)used for
Disadvantages of mercury phytovolatilization is perchlorate in soil and water (Mwegoha et al.
recycling by rain and a residue back into the 2007).Some treatments used for enhancing
ecosystem (Alkorta et al., 2004). rhizodegradation like as supplying organic carbon
(Yifru and Nzengung, 2008),chicken manure
2.6. Phytodegradation (Mwegoha et al., 2007) and organic waste treatment
(Dadrasnia and Agamuthu, 2013).
Phyodegradation or phytotransformation refers to two
kind of plant reactions it is independent on 2.8. Phytomining
rhizospheric microorganisms (Vishnoi and Srivastava,
2007) contain phytoreduction which is the reductive Phytomining or bio-ore is a green technology which
transformation of oxidized organic compounds by could generate revenue from saleable metallic
reducing plant enzymes and phytooxidation which is elements that accumulated in ash of plants biomass
the oxidative transformation reactions catalyzed by (Ghosh and Singh, 2005). Mining of nickele has been
plant oxidizing enzymes (Nzengung and Jeffers, already a patented technology (Chaney et al., 1998).
2001).Plant enzymes contain five various Normally phytomining occurs in situ at the
nitroreductaces (Schnoor et al., 1995), dehalogenase contaminated mine lands or sub-economical ore
and oxygenase (Vishnoi and Srivastava, 2007) (Anderson et al., 1998). Phytoextraction or
degrade organic compounds. The main bioextraction of metals for commercial gain contain
phytodegradation process for organic contamination in cropping, harvesting, drying and ashing are main
plants are, uptake, translocation and metabolism process of phytomining (Sheoran et al., 2009). Cattails
(Dzantor et al., 2002).Taken up of most of Polycyclic (Typha latifolia) used for absorbing boron (B) from
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)is hard for plants and the effluent of biggest borax mine of the world and
less suitable for phytodegradation (Reichenauer and 250mgkg-1 boron absorbed in constructed wetland
Germida, 2008). Some of the main organic compound system (Türker et al., 2013).
that successfully degraded by plant species are
hexachloroethane (HCA), 2.9. Phytostabilization
dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) (Nzengung
and Jeffers, 2001) and carbon tetrachloride (Wang et This technology applied for decreasing bioavailability
al., 2004). Inorganics compounds like as sulfur oxides of contamination from environment and stabilizing of
and atmospheric nitrogen oxides can be taken up by pollutants occurs more than removing
plants for degradation. Genetically modified plant them(commonly metallic elements) by plants
species also had been used for phytodegradation (Doty (hydraulic control) ? (Padmavathiamma and Li, 2007).
et al., 2000). Enhancing appropriate soil modification by plants
,caused to decreasing bioavailability of metallic
2.7. Rhizodegradation elements on the other hands plant cover decreased
leaching and enhance environmental protection
Rhizodegradation is breakdown organic (Houben et al., 2011).Plants can help to stabilize
compounds(fuels and solvents) to plants nutrients in pollutants with up taking in adsorption system or
rhizospher trough microbial (fungi, yeast , bacteria accumulate them in root system (Vangronsveld et al.,
and other microorganisms )activity which is very 2009). Plant selection for phytostabilizing is a critical
slower than phytodegradation process and also called issue and perennial species, well local
phytostimulation (Hutchinson et al., 2003; Ghosh and environmentally adapted ,high biomass production
Singh, 2005; Ridzuan et al., 2010).This technology and high resistance to pollution recommended (Pilon-
widely applied in treatment of soils so that in Smits, 2005). Since there is no natural
Germany there are more than 100 years background hyperaccumulator phytoremediator for mercury
for rhizoremediation (Wand et al., 2002). Generally, controlling this toxic metallic element is critical so
plant exudates same as carboxylic , amino acids and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) reported as a
carbohydrates are capable to stimulate entire suitable plant species for stabilization of mercury in
rhizosphere microbial action and enhance soil and wastewater (Shiyab, Chen et al. 2009).
rhizodegradation proceeding (Dzantor, 2007) Some of Aquatic plant Hydrilla verticillata reported as
208
Faraji
Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods
Fig. 1: Relative uptake and biological accumulation potential in plant species (Bradl, 2005)
210
Faraji
Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods
211
Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Chapter 7: Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Technologies
212
Faraji
Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods
218