Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 15

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/299604479

Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods

Chapter · December 2014

CITATIONS READS

2 9,160

1 author:

Hossein Farraji
Universiti Sains Malaysia
17 PUBLICATIONS   18 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Novel method for Palm oil mill effluent treatment View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Hossein Farraji on 04 April 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Available online at http://www.ijsrpub.com/books
©2014 IJSRPUB

Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and


Treatment Technologies

Chapter 7: Wastewater Treatment by


Phytoremediation Technologies

205
Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Available online at http://www.ijsrpub.com/books
©2014 IJSRPUB

Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods


Hossein Farraji

School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, University Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
Email: hosseinfarraji@gmail.com

Abstract. Nowadays many technologies are using for treatment of environmental pollutions and phytoremediation as a green
technology is going on to convert to one of the main ecofriendly technologies which scientist using in their researches. Aquatic
media as a fundamental and critical part of human environment have main role in water resources and food chain. In this
chapter we present different aspect and types of phytoremediation in aquatic media purification from metallic elements.

Keywords: Wastewater, Treatment, Phytoremediation

1. INTRODUCTION plants (Ndimele and Ndimele, 2013). Two approaches


have been presented in literatures about
The anthropogenic emissions of metallic elements phytoremediation, natural or continuous
globally ends up to wastewater and industrialization phytoremediation and chemically enhanced
caused a lot of environmental problems .Heavy metals phytoremediation (Lombi et al., 2001; Alkorta et al.,
spectacular Zn, Cu, Ni and Cr are most common 2004).
contain of industrial wastewater (Sun and Shi, 1998).
For example recently report from China indicate that 2.1. Continuous or natural phytoremediation
anthropogenic emissions of cadmium to atmosphere
from 1990 to 2010 increased from 474 to 2186 ton This type of phytoremediation fundamentally based
(Shao et al., 2013). Most Cd is emitted to the on using natural hyperaccumulator plants with not
atmosphere at the first stage and then precipitate on to only exceptional metal accumulation in shoots but
water and soil (Yamagata, 1979). Meanwhile also extraordinary tolerance to metal toxicity in root
vulnerability of ground water as drinking water around media (Assunção et al., 2003; Prasad, 2004).
sources, is higher than surface water (Landmeyer,
2012). levels of arsenic in groundwater sources is 2.2. Chemically enhanced phytoremediation
higher in comparing with surface-water sources
(Bissen and Frimmel, 2003). On the other hands, Natural phytoremediation have following drawbacks
concentrate ions and accumulation of some pollutants (Hem, 1970; Prasad, 2004; Yoonet al., 2006):
same as 137Cs in aquatic media are higher than (a) Low biomass and slow growth in
sediment or soils (Ashraf et al., 2013), so it shows hyperaccumulator plants; (b) Low translocation of
critical statue of decontamination of wastewater (Shao metals in hyperaccumulator plants; (c) Insolubility or
et al., 2013). immobility of metallic elements in media; (d) Low up
taking element by roots.
2. PYTOREMEDIATION A chemical enhancement for phytoremediation
helps to overcome these limitations. Chelating ligands
Phytoremediation is vast, emerging term which has like as ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), 1,
been used in recent decades for a group of green 3-propylene-diaminetetra-aceticacid (PTDA), nitrilo-
ecofriendly technologies that fundamentally based on tri-acetic acid (NTA), diethyl triamine penta-acetic
plants (aquatic, semiaquatic and terrestrial) and acid (DTPA), etc. Which are microbial poorly
related associated enzymes, microorganism and water degradable and present in µg/L concentration in
consumption, uptake, remove, retain, transform, aquatic media (Knepper, 2003), reduce net shoot and
degrade or immobilize contamination (organic and/or root biomass production (Römkens et al., 2002).
inorganic) with different origin, from soil, sediment Several aspect of phytoremediation improved and
and aquatic media or atmosphere (Mueller et al., 1999, established based on mechanism of decontamination,
Pivetz, 2001, Ghosh and Singh, 2005; Vishnoi and kind of pollutions, affected factors and media of
Srivastava, 2007; Mulbry et al., 2008; Ridzuan et al. remediation (Stout and Nüsslein 2010; Dhir, 2013).
2010, Dhir 2013). To sum it up, phytoremediation in Table 1 is summarized typical kind of this green
aquatic media is directly up take and accumulation of technology and its process.
contaminant from water media and assimilation by

206
Faraji
Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods

Table1: Phytoremediation process (Dhir, 2013)

2.3. Advantages of aquatic phytoremediation Alkorta et al., 2004; Ghosh and Singh, 2005; Shiyab
et al., 2009; Delmail et al., 2013, Kumar et al., 2013;
These green technologies as an ecofriendly present Nan et al., 2013).
many advantages for decontamination of aquatic (a) Harvested biomass contains hazardous
polluted media comparing other treatment systems pollution; (b) Long time need for effective treatment;
(Ximénez-Embún et al., 2001; Bissen and Frimmel (c) Deep polluted media are limited treating; (d)
2003; Ghosh and Singh, 2005; Kirkham, 2006; Verma Limited to climate growth condition (tropical,
et al., 2007; Olguín and Sánchez-Galván, 2010; subtropical and tempered zoon); (e) Restricted to low
Landmeyer, 2012; Wang and Calderon, 2012; Delmail concentration of polluted site; (f) Harvested biomass
et al., 2013). managing required; (g) Limited hyperaccumulator
(a) Greatly cost effective; (b) species introduced for aquatic media; (h) Leaves fall
Environmentally Compatible, green aesthetically; (c) may cause spread contaminant; (i) Most of
Feasible globally technology (no need to high-tech hyperaccumulator plants have limited roots and slow
equipment or material); (d) Easy maintenance (supply growing; (j) Most of hyperaccumulator species up
and energy) solar powered; (e) In situ and ex situ take only limited elements; (k) Many of
operation available; (f) Inhibiting deployment of hyperaccumulators propagation system is sexual; (l)
contamination to atmosphere or soil by in situ Recycling to soil and water by rain in volatilized
operation; (g) Suitable for shallow depth contaminated pollutions; (m) Possibility of entering contaminated
water to hydrologic control of ground water; (h) biomass to animal and human food chain
Periodic treatment against continued treatments; (i)
Different types of many contaminations can be treated 2.5. Phytovolatilization
in one time; (j) Produce biomass for renewable energy
production; (k) Rapid mass propagation by tissue This kind of phytoremediation involves the utilization
culture available; (l) Almost treatable for all kind of of plants to take up pollutions from contaminated
contaminations (organic, inorganic and radionuclides); media, transforming them into volatile form and
(m) Operable approximately in all media (aquatic, finally transpiring them into the air.
sediment, soil and atmosphere); (n) Broad acceptable phytovolatilization normally occurs in plants for up
pH (2-10) for treatment; (o) Chelating molecules taking water, organic and inorganic compounds so
positively affected phytoremediation; some of contamination can pass through the plant
parts to the leaves and at low concentration ,volatilize
2.4. Disadvantages of aquatic phytoremediation into the atmosphere (Mueller et al., 1999) In a
nutshell, the use of plant species for volatilize
Same as each technology, phytoremediation suffer contaminants from the leaves which can use for soil
from disadvantages which should considered through and sediment pollutions (Mueller et al., 1999) air
applying (Mojiri et al. 2013; Assunção et al., 2003, contaminations (Burken and Schnoor, 1999) and water

207
Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Chapter 7: Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Technologies

pollution (Baeder-Bederski-Anteda, 2003). The plants which applied for Rhizodegradation are
phytovolatilization radionuclides such as Tritium(3H) Hibiscus cannabinus for used lubricating oil (Abioye
from soil (Dushenkov, 2003),significantly up taking et al., 2012), Sorghum bicolor L. for crude oil (Banks
selenium compounds contain dimethyldiselenide and et al., 2003), Broadleaf plantain plant (Plantago
dimethylselenide by Brassica species (Bañuelos et al., major L.) for Imidacloprid (insecticide) in water and
2000) are some sample studies on phytovolatilization. soil (Romeh, 2009), willow (Salix babylonica)used for
Disadvantages of mercury phytovolatilization is perchlorate in soil and water (Mwegoha et al.
recycling by rain and a residue back into the 2007).Some treatments used for enhancing
ecosystem (Alkorta et al., 2004). rhizodegradation like as supplying organic carbon
(Yifru and Nzengung, 2008),chicken manure
2.6. Phytodegradation (Mwegoha et al., 2007) and organic waste treatment
(Dadrasnia and Agamuthu, 2013).
Phyodegradation or phytotransformation refers to two
kind of plant reactions it is independent on 2.8. Phytomining
rhizospheric microorganisms (Vishnoi and Srivastava,
2007) contain phytoreduction which is the reductive Phytomining or bio-ore is a green technology which
transformation of oxidized organic compounds by could generate revenue from saleable metallic
reducing plant enzymes and phytooxidation which is elements that accumulated in ash of plants biomass
the oxidative transformation reactions catalyzed by (Ghosh and Singh, 2005). Mining of nickele has been
plant oxidizing enzymes (Nzengung and Jeffers, already a patented technology (Chaney et al., 1998).
2001).Plant enzymes contain five various Normally phytomining occurs in situ at the
nitroreductaces (Schnoor et al., 1995), dehalogenase contaminated mine lands or sub-economical ore
and oxygenase (Vishnoi and Srivastava, 2007) (Anderson et al., 1998). Phytoextraction or
degrade organic compounds. The main bioextraction of metals for commercial gain contain
phytodegradation process for organic contamination in cropping, harvesting, drying and ashing are main
plants are, uptake, translocation and metabolism process of phytomining (Sheoran et al., 2009). Cattails
(Dzantor et al., 2002).Taken up of most of Polycyclic (Typha latifolia) used for absorbing boron (B) from
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)is hard for plants and the effluent of biggest borax mine of the world and
less suitable for phytodegradation (Reichenauer and 250mgkg-1 boron absorbed in constructed wetland
Germida, 2008). Some of the main organic compound system (Türker et al., 2013).
that successfully degraded by plant species are
hexachloroethane (HCA), 2.9. Phytostabilization
dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) (Nzengung
and Jeffers, 2001) and carbon tetrachloride (Wang et This technology applied for decreasing bioavailability
al., 2004). Inorganics compounds like as sulfur oxides of contamination from environment and stabilizing of
and atmospheric nitrogen oxides can be taken up by pollutants occurs more than removing
plants for degradation. Genetically modified plant them(commonly metallic elements) by plants
species also had been used for phytodegradation (Doty (hydraulic control) ? (Padmavathiamma and Li, 2007).
et al., 2000). Enhancing appropriate soil modification by plants
,caused to decreasing bioavailability of metallic
2.7. Rhizodegradation elements on the other hands plant cover decreased
leaching and enhance environmental protection
Rhizodegradation is breakdown organic (Houben et al., 2011).Plants can help to stabilize
compounds(fuels and solvents) to plants nutrients in pollutants with up taking in adsorption system or
rhizospher trough microbial (fungi, yeast , bacteria accumulate them in root system (Vangronsveld et al.,
and other microorganisms )activity which is very 2009). Plant selection for phytostabilizing is a critical
slower than phytodegradation process and also called issue and perennial species, well local
phytostimulation (Hutchinson et al., 2003; Ghosh and environmentally adapted ,high biomass production
Singh, 2005; Ridzuan et al., 2010).This technology and high resistance to pollution recommended (Pilon-
widely applied in treatment of soils so that in Smits, 2005). Since there is no natural
Germany there are more than 100 years background hyperaccumulator phytoremediator for mercury
for rhizoremediation (Wand et al., 2002). Generally, controlling this toxic metallic element is critical so
plant exudates same as carboxylic , amino acids and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) reported as a
carbohydrates are capable to stimulate entire suitable plant species for stabilization of mercury in
rhizosphere microbial action and enhance soil and wastewater (Shiyab, Chen et al. 2009).
rhizodegradation proceeding (Dzantor, 2007) Some of Aquatic plant Hydrilla verticillata reported as
208
Faraji
Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods

potential species for phytostabilization of wastewater, 2.11. Phycoremediation


in this plant has high translocation factor (TF) and low
bio concentration factor (BCF) for toxic metals Phycoremediation is using macro and micro algae for
(Pb,Cr) (Ahmad et al., 2011). Rapeseeds (Brassica bio transforming or removing pollutions from
napus), sunflowers (Helianthus annuus), tomatoes wastewater furthermore CO2 as air pollution from
(Solanum lycopersicum) and soapworts (Saponaria waste air (Mulbry et al., 2008; Rawat et al., 2011).
officinalis) reported as capable plants for Algae is a suitable plant for decontamination of
phytostabilization with less than one bioaccumulation metallic elements, xenobiotic, nutrients in various
coefficients obtained in all of these plants (Sung et al., wastewater and consume of carbon dioxide from
2011). Major metallic element removal in plant exhausts ( gu , 2003). Micro algae is a capable
species phragmites (Phragmites australis), Typha spp, plant for treatment of various type of wastewater such
Juncus spp, Spartina spp and Scirpus spp from as industrial wastewater ,domestic wastewater and
different wastewater contaminated area are solid wastes both aerobically and anaerobically
phytoextraction and phytostabilization (Bhatia and (Safonova et al., 2004). For this technology ,oldest
Goyal, 2013). scientific research carried out in half century ago
(Oswald and Gotaas, 1957). In a pilot study on
2.10. Phytofiltration chrome sludge, phycoremediation with Desmococcus
olivaceus could effectively decrease nitrate,
Phytofiltration or rhyzofiltration is a green technology phosphate, ammonia, TDS ,TSS and chrome
for removing contaminations by plants roots in aquatic (Sivasubramanian et al., 2010). Fresh water blue green
media like as ground water, most of wastewaters and algae used successfully for treatment of dairy manure
extracted ground water (Pivetz, 2001; Mukhopadhyay effluent(Mulbry et al., 2008). Sewage water treated by
and Maiti, 2010). Terrestrial, aquatic and wetland different algae and Chlorella vulgaris could remove
plants are suitable material for phytofiltration and almost all of contaminations and after treating process
constructed wetlands are the best method for it can be thrown in water bodies 1n 2013.
removing metallic elements from wastewater (Cheng
et al., 2002). Limnocharis flava (L.) reported as 2.12. Phytoextraction
suitable plant species for phytofiltration of low
concentration Cd contaminated water (Abhilash et al. Phytoextraction /phytoaccumulation (Khan et al.,
2009) Wolffia globosa is a suitable nominated for 2000) can be considered as suitable green technology
arsenic metabolism studying via phytofiltration for removing metallic elements from aquatic media
(Zhang et al. 2009).For effective accumulation of (Wang et al., 2008). This kind of remediation used for
cadmium and hyperaccumulation of arsenic, accumulation of Zinc by duckwood (Lemna gibba)
micranthemum umbrosum introduced as suitable (Khellaf and Zerdaoui, 2009), Cadmium by water
macrophyte (Islam et al., 2013). Indian mustard spinach (Ipomea aquatic) (Wang et al., 2008),
(Brassica juncea (L.) Czern) could uptake 95% Chromium with small pondweed (Potamogeton
mercury from contaminated water via phytofiltration pusillus) in presence of Cu2+ (Monferrán et al., 2012).
(Moreno et al., 2008). Aquatic plants, Pteris recently reported study carried out for accumulation of
creticacvMayii (Moonlight fern) and Pteris.vittata Pb by Ceratophyllum demersum and Myriophyllum
(Chinese brake fern) as arsenic hyperaccumulator spicatum and finally introduced as phytoremediator
plants, used via phytofiltration (Alkorta et al., 2004; and bioindicator of Pb. (El-Khatib et al., 2014) Water
Tu et al. 2004; Baldwin and Butcher, 2007). The hyacinth (Eichhornia Crassipes) used for removing
mechanism of phytofiltration is similar to heavy metals from coastal water (Agunbiade et al.,
phytoextraction containe 1) chemisorption 2) 2009), Crude oil from artificial wastewater amended
complexation 3) ion exchange 4)micro precipitation by urea fertilizer (Ndimele and Ndimele 2013) and
5)hydroxide condensation 6) surface adsorption palm oil mill effluent treatment (Christwardana and
(Cheng et al., 2002; Gardea-Torresdey et al., 2004). Soetrisnanto, 2013). Furthermore, heavy metals from
Plant specification in phytofiltration should be 1) industrial wastewater have been removed by vetiver
tolerance to high level of metallic elements 2) facile (Chrysopogan zizanioides) (Roongtanakiat, 2009).
handling 3) high root biomass or surface area 4)
reasonable maintenance cost 5) least secondary waste 3. HEAVY METAL
requirement (Dushenkov, 2003).
Generally speaking, heavy metals which nowadays
known as metallic elements (Mbengue et al., 2014),
confined as element with density higher than 4.5- 5
mg mL-1 /kg dm -3 (Sarkar, 2002)but the collective
209
Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Chapter 7: Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Technologies

term includes arsenic(As), cadmium(Cd), lead(Pb),


Mercury (Hg), nickel(Ni), chromium (Cr), zinc (Zn), 3.2.1. Bioconcentration factor (BF)
copper (Cu), aluminum (Al), cesium (Cs), Ferrum
(Fe), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), radium The ratio of concentration of metallic elements in
(Ra), uranium (U), strontium (Sr), platinum (Pt), plants tissue (roots, shoots) to that in contaminated
palladium (Pd), beryllium (Be) (McIntyre 2003) site (Tu et al., 2002),it also termed as bio
Metallic elements are persistent and non- concentration factor (BCF) (Marchiol et al., 2004).
biodegradable (Mahmood et al., 2010) .cooperation of
several disciplines engineering such as environmental, 3.2.2. Enrichment Coefficient (EC)
civil, and chemical is fundamental requirement for
remediation of heavy metals (Bradl, 2005). It termed as degree of metallic elements accumulation
in plants (shoot, roots) to concentration of metallic
3.1. Metal removal rate elements at contaminated site (Kisku et al., 2000). It
also termed as biological accumulation coefficient
The rate of metallic elements removal from polluted (BAC).
wetland depended on plant spices, climacteric
condition, statue of substrates, type of element
(Hg>Mn>Cd=Fe>Cr=Pb>Cu=Zn>Al>Ni>As), their
ionic forms (Marchand et al., 2010). Remediation 3.2.3. Translocation (mobilization) factor (TF)
habit of plants species hyperaccumulator>
acuumulator> indicator> excluder (Figure 1) (Bradl, This factor calculated to determine the translocation of
2005).PH less than 5 is harmful for plants meanwhile metallic elements from the root of plant to shoot
there is a report for a plant species (Lupinus) that can (McGrath and Zhao, 2003).
growth in pH<2 and uptake 98% metallic elements
(Ximénez-Embún et al., 2001).Results of five aquatic where; TF in hyperaccumulator species is more than
species indicated that all aluminum uptake increased one
in low pH (Gallon et al., 2004).
3.2.4. Relative treatment efficiency index (RTEI)
3.2. Indexs of phytoremediation
Introduced by (Marchand et al., 2010)which is based
There are some index that helps to calculate efficiency on comparing control treatment metal removal with
of phytoremediation and assessment of plant ability in
influent metal concentration and effluent treatment
up taking and translocation or mobilization (Kisku et
metal removal ,meanwhile previous index are suitable
al., 2000) of metallic elements. these index use for now (Kumar et al., 2013).
collecting hyperaccumulator plant species (McGrath
and Zhao, 2003).

Fig. 1: Relative uptake and biological accumulation potential in plant species (Bradl, 2005)

210
Faraji
Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods

4. HYPERACCUMULATORH studying site (Xing et al., 2013).Some of recently


carried out studies are listed in Table 2, and a number
Hyperaccumulator used as first time in 1948 by Italian of old researches added because of their importance.
scientist (Fingerman and Nagabhushanam, 2005). The
plant spices which accumulate heavy metals more 5. FUTURE STUDIES
than 1% dry weight, named hyperaccumulator
(Zavoda et al., 2001). Most common aquatic Micro propagation is the best way for mass production
hyperaccumulators are Spirodelta polyrhiza, of some aquatic machrophyte, since produce a lot of
Eichhornia crassipes and Elodeu nuttali (Dhir et al., unique genetically plants in short time for analytical
2009), meanwhile Marchand reported there is no data collection (Kan et al. 1990),which may use for
aquatic hyperaccumulator plant species(Marchand et phytoremediation of contamination particular metallic
al., 2010). Tow pictures of native natural terrestrial elements, first report in this area reported by (Delmail
hyperaccumulator plants(Figure 2 and Figure 3) et al., 2013), There is no reports on natural Mercury
collected in China and Malaysia(Xue et al. 2004; van phytoremediator plants(Shiyab et al., 2009)and high
der Ent et al., 2013) .Effective phytoremediation toxicity of this element for human (Harris et al.
highly correlated to suitable plant selection 2003)presents a critical circumstance for introducing
(Manousaki, Kadukova et al., 2008).High biomass suitable candidate for phytoremediation of Mercury.
,deep and/or wide roots, easy harvesting easily A genetically studying is trying to make Hg
provide renewable energy and resistance to high hyperaccumulator by the Meagher laboratory
concentration of pollutant are common characters of (Fingerman and Nagabhushanam, 2005).Nowadays
phytoremediators (Ghosh and Singh, 2005). researches on different concentration of heavy metals
Collecting plants from high polluted area is scientist in sediments, soil and water, in unique case study also
preferred method for finding metallic elements (Falinski et al. 2014), introducing suitable spectacular
hyperaccumulators (Gleba et al., 1999).Through the plant species for water, soil and sediment
all plant species only 400 species (Brooks, 1998) or phytoremediation(Nan, et al., 2013) and using
500 species (Ma et al., 2001)reported as different enhancers like as microbial and Zeolite in
hyperaccumulators. Heavy metals hyperaccumulators phytoremediation process(Karimzadeh et al., 2012) is
belong to approximately 500 tax of angiosperm (less leading researches toward using constructed wetland
than 0.2%) (Krämer, 2010). Recently study in China (CW) as a complete ecological system for treating
introduced three aquatic hyperaccumulator species wastewater spectacular for continues
for heavy metals Najas marina for arsenic (As) and phytoremediation in practical treatment for example
cadmium (Cd), Vallisneria natans for lead (Pb) and removing metals from road runoff (Borne et al.
Ceratophyllum demersum for cobalt (Co), chromium 2014),electric industry wastewater (Yang et al., 2013)
(Cr) and ferrum (Fe) plant species selection for this fresh oilfield produced water (Alley et al., 2013).
study carried out from native nominated plants from

Fig. 2: Nickel hyperaccumulator ultramafic area Fig. 3: Phytolacca acinosa Roxb.


Malaysia and the Philippine (van der Ent et al., 2013) Growing at Xiangtan manganese tailing ,China (Xue
et al., 2004)

211
Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Chapter 7: Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Technologies

Table 2: Summary of recent studies on aquatic hyperaccumulation


Plant species Metallic Results Media Reference
elements
Salvinia Minima(fern) Pb2+ Phytochelatins cope with Artificially polluted (Sánchez-Galván et al.,
pb2+ as one of mechanism water 2008)
Chara Australis (algae) Cd Chara is not a Sediment (Clabeaux et al., 2011)
hyperaccumulator
Talinum Triangular Cu, Pb, Ni, Stem cuttings are new Cu Hydroponic system (Rajkumar et al., 2009)
Cd hyperaccumulator
Cyperus rotundus L. Heavy New Sn Soil and water media. (Ashraf et al., 2011)
metals Hyperaccumulator
Pteris vittata L. As In pH:5.21 fern is hydroponic (Tu et al., 2004)
hyperaccumilator experiment
Nasturtium officials As These are not Sediment soil (Falinski et al., 2014)
diplazium Esculentum Hyperaccumulator water
Eichhornia crassipes Heavy Pb,Zn,Cr,Cu and Ni Artificially polluted (Mahmood et al., 2010)
(Ash) metals Hyperaccumulator water
pistia stratiotens Cd Cd hyperaccumulator surface waters (Das et al., 2013)
Lemna minor Hg Phytoremediator Natural lake water (Isaksson et al., 2007)
Ceratophyllum demersum Pb, Cr 2 Effective Artificially (Abdallah, 2012)
Lemna gibba phytoremediators contaminated water
Eleacharis acicularis Heavy Pb hyperaccumulators abandoned mining and (Ha et al., 2009)
metals sediment
Salvinia minima (fern) Pb2+ Accumulation of Pb artificially (Estrella-Gómez et al., 2012)
increased Glutathiane contaminated
synthase water
Echonrnnia crassipes Fe, Mn, Suitable electric industries (Sahu et al., 2007)
Spirodela polyrhiza Cu, Cd, Bioindicators or waste water
Pb, Cr bioaccumulator
Eichhornia crassipes Fe,Zn,Cu, 3 Suitable artificially (Mishra and Tripathi, 2008)
Spirodela polyrrhiza Cr,Cd phytoremediators contaminated
pistia stratiotens water
Myriophyllum Cd,Cu Hyperaccumulator aquatic media (Delmail et al., 2013)
aterniflorum
1-Najas marina Heavy 1-As and Cd 24 eutrophic lakes (Xing et al., 2013)
2-Ceratophyllum metals hyperaccumulator
demersum 2- Co,Cr and Fe
3-Vallisneria natanas hyperaccumulator
3-Pb hyperaccumulator
Alternantbera philoxeroids heavy Zn and Cd local river (Nan et al., 2013)
metals hyperaccumulator
Myriophyllum vercillatum Pb,Cu,Cd May be hyperaccumulator hydroponic system (Ucer et al., 2013)
and Zn for Pb2+
Pistia stratiotes L. heavy Cr,Cu,Fe,Mn,Ni,Pb, and Surface water (Pant and Singh, 2013)
metals Zn hyperaccumulator
Eichhorna crassipes Cd,Ni The roots are effective in Artificially (Elfeky et al., 2013)
absorbing most of Cd and contaminated water
Ni
Potamogeton natans Cu,Zn,Pb These plants are the most Storm water (Fritioff and Greger, 2003)
Alismaplantago aquatica efficient plant for up taking
Filipendula ulmaria heavy metals
137
Catharanthus roseus Cs Ideal hyperaccumulator Artificially (Eapen et al., 2009)
90
Sr For radionuclides contaminated water
Chrysopagann zizanioides Mn, Harvested plant safely can Industrial wastewater (Roongtanakiat, 2009)
Fe,Cu,Zn, use for compost or
Pb handicrafts
Leersiahexandra Cr Hyperaccumulator electroplating factory (Zhang et al., 2007)
wastewater
Callitriche cophocarpa Cr Suitable bioaccumulator Artificially (Augustynowicz et al., 2013)
contaminated water
Eichhorna crassipes Zn,Cu,Pb, Three native aquatic plants Sediment and water (Kumar et al., 2008)
Ipomea aquatic Ni, Co,Cd are suitable species for Gujarat wetland
Typha angustata phytoremediation
Lemna minor Pb Suitable phytoremediator Artificially (Bianconi et al., 2013)
in low concentration contaminated water

212
Faraji
Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods

REFERENCES radiostrontium (90Sr) and radiocaesium


(137Cs) by Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don in
Abdallah MAM (2012). Phytoremediation of heavy aquatic environment. Environmental
metals from aqueous solutions by two aquatic Engineering and Management Journal, 8(3):
macrophytes, Ceratophyllum demersum and 527-532.
Lemna gibba L. Environmental technology, Anderson CW, Brooks RR, Stewart RB, Simcock R
33(14): 1609-1614. (1998). Harvesting a crop of gold in plants.
Abhilash P, Pand VC, Srivastava P, Rakesh P, Nature, 395: 553-554.
Chandran S, Singh N, Thomas A (2009). Ashraf M, Maah M, Yusoff I (2011). Heavy metals
Phytofiltration of cadmium from water by accumulation in plants growing in ex tin mining
Limnocharis flava (L.) Buchenau grown in free- catchment. International Journal of
floating culture system. Journal of hazardous Environmental Science and Technology, 8(2):
materials, 170(2): 791-797. 401-416.
Abioye O, Agamuthu P, Aziz A (2012). Ashraf MA, Rehman MA, Maah MJ, Yusoff I (2013).
Phytotreatment of soil contaminated with used Cesium-137: Radio-chemistry, Fate and
lubricating oil using Hibiscus cannabinus. Transport, Remediation and Future Concerns.
Biodegradation, 23(2): 277-286. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and
Agunbiade FO, Olu-Owolabi BI, Adebowale KO Technology (accepted).
(2009). Phytoremediation potential of Eichornia Assunção AG, Schat H, Aarts MG (2003). Thlaspi
crassipes in metal-contaminated coastal water. caerulescens, an attractive model species to
Bioresource Technology, 100(19): 4521-4526. study heavy metal hyperaccumulation in plants.
Ahmad, A., R. Ghufran and A. Zularisam (2011). New Phytologist, 159(2): 351-360.
"Phytosequestration of metals in selected plants Augustynowicz J, Kyzioł-Komosińska J, Smo eń S,
growing on a contaminated Okhla industrial Waloszek A (2013). Study on Chromium-
areas, Okhla, New Delhi, India." Water, Air, & Binding Capacity of Callitriche cophocarpa in
Soil Pollution, 217(1-4): 255-266. an Aquatic Environment. Archives of
Ahmad F, Kan AU, Yasar A (2013) Comparative environmental contamination and toxicology, 1-
Phycoremediation of Sewage Water by Various 9.
Species of Algae. Proceedings of the Pakistan Baeder-Bederski-Anteda O (2003). Phytovolatilisation
Academy of Sciences, 50(2): 131–139. of organic chemicals. Journal of Soils and
Alkorta I, Hernández-Allica J, Becerril J, Amezaga I, Sediments, 3(2): 65-71.
Albizu I, Garbisu C (2004). Recent findings on Baldwin PR, Butcher DJ (2007). Phytoremediation of
the phytoremediation of soils contaminated arsenic by two hyperaccumulators in a
with environmentally toxic heavy metals and hydroponic environment. Microchemical
metalloids such as zinc, cadmium, lead, and journal, 85(2): 297-300.
arsenic. Reviews in Environmental Science and Banks M, Kulakow P, Schwab A, Chen Z, Rathbone
Biotechnology, 3(1): 71-90. K (2003). Degradation of crude oil in the
Alkorta I, Hernández-Allica J, Becerril J, Amezaga I, rhizosphere of Sorghum bicolor. International
Albizu I, Onaindia M, Garbisu C (2004). Journal of Phytoremediation, 5(3): 225-234.
Chelate-enhanced phytoremediation of soils Bañuelos G, Zambrzuski S, Mackey B (2000).
polluted with heavy metals. Reviews in Phytoextraction of selenium from soils irrigated
Environmental Science and Biotechnology, with selenium-laden effluent. Plant and Soil,
3(1): 55-70. 224(2): 251-258.
Alkorta I, Hernández-Allica J, Garbisu C (2004). Bhatia M, Goyal D (2013). Analyzing remediation
Plants against the global epidemic of arsenic potential of wastewater through wetland plants:
poisoning. Environment international, 30(7): A review. Environmental Progress &
949-951. Sustainable Energy.
Alley BL, Willis B, Rodgers J, Castle JW (2013). Bianconi D, Pietrini F, Massacci A, Iannelli M (2013).
Water depths and treatment performance of Uptake of Cadmium by Lemna minor, a
pilot-scale free water surface constructed (hyper?-) accumulator plant involved in
wetland treatment systems for simulated fresh phytoremediation applications. E3S Web of
oilfield produced water. Ecological Conferences, EDP Sciences.
Engineering, 61: 190-199. Bissen M, Frimmel FH (2003). Arsenic—a review.
Anamika S, Eapen S, Fulekar MH (2009). Part I: occurrence, toxicity, speciation,
Phytoremediation technology for remediation of
213
Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Chapter 7: Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Technologies

mobility. Acta hydrochimica et hydrobiologica, Dhir B, Sharmila P, Saradhi PP (2009). Potential of


31(1): 9-18. aquatic macrophytes for removing contaminants
Borne KE, Fassman-Beck EA, Tanner CC (2014). from the environment. Critical Reviews in
Floating Treatment Wetland influences on the Environmental Science and Technology, 39(9):
fate of metals in road runoff retention ponds. 754-781.
Water research, 48: 430-442. Doty SL, Shang TQ, Wilson AM, Tangen J,
Bradl H (2005). Heavy Metals in the Environment: Westergreen AD, Newman LA, Strand SE,
Origin, Interaction and Remediation: Origin, Gordon MP (2000). Enhanced metabolism of
Interaction and Remediation, Access Online via halogenated hydrocarbons in transgenic plants
Elsevier. containing mammalian cytochrome P450 2E1.
Brooks RR (1998). Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy Proceedings of the National Academy of
metals: their role in phytoremediation, Sciences, 97(12): 6287-6291.
microbiology, archaeology, mineral exploration Dushenkov S (2003). Trends in phytoremediation of
and phytomining, CAB international. radionuclides. Plant and Soil, 249(1): 167-175.
Burken JG Schnoor JL (1999). Distribution and Dzantor EK (2007). Phytoremediation: the state of
volatilization of organic compounds following rhizosphere ‘e gi eeri g’for acce erated
uptake by hybrid poplar trees. International rhizodegradation of xenobiotic contaminants.
Journal of Phytoremediation, 1(2): 139-151. Journal of Chemical Technology and
Chaney RL, Angle JS, Baker AJ, Li YM (1998). Biotechnology, 82(3): 228-232.
Method for phytomining of nickel, cobalt and Dzantor EK, Woolston J, Momen B (2002). PCB
other metals from soil, Google Patents. dissipation and microbial community analysis
Cheng S, Grosse W, Karrenbrock F, Thoennessen M in rhizosphere soil under substrate amendment
(2002). Efficiency of constructed wetlands in conditions. International Journal of
decontamination of water polluted by heavy Phytoremediation, 4(4): 283-295.
metals. Ecological Engineering, 18(3): 317-325. El-Khatib A, Hegazy A, Abo-El-Kassem AM (2014).
Christwardana M, Soetrisnanto D (2013). Bioaccumulation Potential and Physiological
Phytoremediations of Palm Oil Mill Effluent Responses of Aquatic Macrophytes to Pb
(POME) by Using Aquatic Plants and Pollution. International Journal of
Microalge for Biomass Production. Journal of Phytoremediation, 16(1): 29-45.
Environmental Science & Technology, 6(2). Elfeky SA, Imam H, Alsherbini AA (2013). Bio-
Clabeaux BL, Navarro DA, Aga DS, Bisson MA absorption of Ni and Cd on Eichhornia
(2011). Cd tolerance and accumulation in the crassipes root thin film. Environmental Science
aquatic macrophyte, Chara australis: potential and Pollution Research,1-7.
use for charophytes in phytoremediation. Estrella-Gómez NE, Sauri-Duch E, Zapata-Pérez O,
Environmental science & technology, 45(12): Santamaría JM (2012). Glutathione plays a role
5332-5338. in protecting leaves of Salvinia minima from
Dadrasnia A, Agamuthu P (2013). Bioremediation of Pb2+ damage associated with changes in the
Diesel Fuel Contaminated Soil by Podocarpus expression of SmGS genes and increased
polystachyus Enhancedwith Organic Wastes. activity of GS. Environmental and
Malaysian Journal of Science, 32(1): 9-14. Experimental Botany, 75: 188-194.
Das S, Goswami S, Talukdar AD (2013). A Study on Falinski K, Yost R, Sampaga E, Peard J (2014).
Cadmium Phytoremediation Potential of Water Arsenic accumulation by edible aquatic
Lettuce, Pistia stratiotes L. Bulletin of macrophytes. Ecotoxicology and environmental
environmental contamination and toxicology, 1- safety, 99: 74-81.
6. Fingerman M, Nagabhushanam R (2005).
Delmail D, Labrousse P, Hourdin P, Larcher L, Bioremediation of aquatic and terrestrial
Moesch C, Botineau M (2013). ecosystems. Science Publishers.
Micropropagation of Myriophyllum Fritioff Å, Greger M (2003). Aquatic and terrestrial
alterniflorum (Haloragaceae) for stream plant species with potential to remove heavy
rehabilitation: first in vitro culture and metals from stormwater. International Journal
reintroduction assays of a heavy-metal of Phytoremediation, 5(3): 211-224.
hyperaccumulator immersed macrophyte. Gallon C, Munger C, Prémont S, Campbell PG
International Journal of Phytoremediation, (2004). Hydroponic study of aluminum
15(7): 647-662. accumulation by aquatic plants: effects of
Dhir B (2013). Phytoremediation: Role of Aquatic fluoride and pH. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution,
Plants in Environmental Clean-Up. Springer. 153(1-4): 135-155.
214
Faraji
Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods

Gardea-Torresdey J, De La Rosa G, Peralta-Videa J phytochelators in heavy metal contaminated


(2004). Use of phytofiltration technologies in land remediation. Chemosphere, 41(1): 197-
the removal of heavy metals: A review. Pure 207.
and Applied Chemistry, 76(4): 801-813. Khellaf N, Zerdaoui M (2009). Phytoaccumulation of
Ghosh M, Singh S (2005). A review on zinc by the aquatic plant, Lemna gibba L.
phytoremediation of heavy metals and Bioresource technology, 100(23): 6137-6140.
utilization of it's by products. Asian J Energy Kirkham M (2006). Cadmium in plants on polluted
Environ, 6(4): 18. soils: Effects of soil factors,
Gleba D, Borisjuk NV, Borisjuk LG, Kneer R, Poulev hyperaccumulation, and amendments.
A, Skarzhinskaya M, Dushenkov S, Logendra Geoderma, 137(1): 19-32.
S, Gleba YY, Raskin I (1999). Use of plant Kisku G, Barman S, Bhargava S (2000).
roots for phytoremediation and molecular Contamination of soil and plants with
farming. Proceedings of the National Academy potentially toxic elements irrigated with mixed
of Sciences, 96(11): 5973-5977. industrial effluent and its impact on the
Ha H, Thi N, Sakakibara M, Sano S, Hori RS, Sera K environment. Water, air, and soil pollution,
(2009). The potential of Eleocharis acicularis 120(1-2): 121-137.
for phytoremediation: case study at an Knepper TP (2003). Synthetic chelating agents and
abandoned mine site. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water, compounds exhibiting complexing properties in
37(3): 203-208. the aquatic environment. TrAC Trends in
Harris HH, Pickering IJ, George GN (2003). The Analytical Chemistry, 22(10): 708-724.
chemical form of mercury in fish. Science, Krämer U (2010). Metal hyperaccumulation in plants.
301(5637): 1203-1203. Annual review of plant biology, 61: 517-534.
Hem JD (1970). Chemical behavior of mercury in Kumar JN, Soni H, Kumar RN, Bhatt I (2008).
aqueous media. Mercury in the environment. Macrophytes in phytoremediation of heavy
United States Geological Survey Professional metal contaminated water and sediments in
Papers, 713: 19-24. Pariyej Community Reserve, Gujarat, India.
Houben D, Pircar J, Sonnet P (2011). Heavy metal Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic
immobilization by cost-effective amendments Sciences, 8(2): 193-200.
in a contaminated soil: Effects on metal Kumar N, Bauddh K, Kumar S, Dwivedi N, Singh D,
leaching and phytoavailability. Journal of Barman S (2013). Accumulation of metals in
Geochemical Exploration. weed species grown on the soil contaminated
Hutchinson S, Schwab A, Banks M (2003). with industrial waste and their
Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in phytoremediation potential. Ecological
the rhizosphere. Phytoremediation: Engineering, 61: 491-495.
transformation and control of contaminants. Kumar SR, Arumugam T, Anandakumar C,
Isaksson R, Balogh SJ, Farris MA (2007). Balakrishnan S, Rajavel D (2013). Use of Plant
Accumulation of mercury by the aquatic plant Species in Controlling Environmental
Lemna minor. International journal of Pollution-A. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., 2:
environmental studies, 64(2): 189-194. 52-63.
Islam MS, Ueno Y, Sikder MT, Kurasaki M (2013). Landmeyer JE (2012). Introduction to
Phytofiltration of arsenic and cadmium from the phytoremediation of contaminated groundwater.
water environment using Micranthemum Springer.
umbrosum (JF Gmel) SF Blake as a Lombi E, Zhao F, Dunham S, McGrath S (2001).
hyperaccumulator. International Journal of Phytoremediation of heavy metal–contaminated
Phytoremediation, 15(10): 1010-1021. soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30(6):
Kane ME, Gilman EF, Jenks MA, Sheehan TJ (1990). 1919-1926.
Micropropagation of the aquatic plant Ma LQ, Komar KM, Tu C, Zhang W, Cai Y,
Cryptocoryne lucens. HortScience, 25(6): 687- Kennelley ED (2001). A fern that
689. hyperaccumulates arsenic. Nature, 409(6820):
Karimzadeh L, Heilmeier H, Merkel BJ (2012). Effect 579-579.
of microbial siderophore DFO-B on Cd Mahmood T, Malik SA, Hussain ST (2010).
accumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens Biosorption and recovery of heavy metals from
hyperaccumulator in the presence of zeolite. aqueous solutions by Eichhornia crassipes
Chemosphere, 88(6): 683-687. (water hyacinth) ash. BioResources, 5(2): 1244-
Khan A, Kuek C, Chaudhry T, Khoo C, Hayes W 1256.
(2000). Role of plants, mycorrhizae and
215
Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Chapter 7: Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Technologies

Manousaki E, Kadukova J, Papadantonakis N, Mulbry W, Kondrad S, Pizarro C, Kebede-Westhead


Kalogerakis N (2008). Phytoextraction and E (2008). Treatment of dairy manure effluent
phytoexcretion of Cd by the leaves of Tamarix using freshwater algae: algal productivity and
smyrnensis growing on contaminated non- recovery of manure nutrients using pilot-scale
saline and saline soils. Environmental research, algal turf scrubbers. Bioresource technology,
106(3): 326-332. 99(17): 8137-8142.
Marchand L, Mench M, Jacob D, Otte M (2010). Mwegoha W, Mbuya OS, Jain A, Ugochukwu NH,
Metal and metalloid removal in constructed Abazinge MD (2007). Use of chicken manure
wetlands, with emphasis on the importance of extract for biostimulation and enhancement of
plants and standardized measurements: a perchlorate rhizodegradation in soil and water
review. Environmental pollution, 158(12): media. Bioremediation journal, 11(2): 61-70.
3447-3461. Nan H, Jifang Z, Dexin D, Guangyue L, Jie Y, Xin C,
Marchiol L, Sacco P, Assolari S, Zerbi G (2004). Jia Y (2013). Screening of Native
Reclamation of polluted soil: phytoremediation Hyperaccumulators at the Huayuan River
potential of crop-related Brassica species. Contaminated by Heavy Metals.
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 158(1): 345-356. Bioremediation Journal, 17(1): 21-29.
Mbengue S, Alleman LY, Flament P (2014). Size- Ndimele P, Ndimele C (2013). Comparative effects of
distributed metallic elements in submicronic biostimulation and phytoremediation on crude
and ultrafine atmospheric particles from urban oil degradation and absorption by water
and industrial areas in northern France. hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms).
Atmospheric Research, 135: 35-47. International Journal of Environmental Studies,
McGrath SP, Zhao FJ (2003). Phytoextraction of 70(2): 241-258.
metals and metalloids from contaminated soils. Nzengung VA, Jeffers P (2001). Sequestration,
Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 14(3): 277- phytoreduction, and phytooxidation of
282. halogenated organic chemicals by aquatic and
McIntyre T (2003). Databases and protocol for plant terrestrial plants. International Journal of
and microorganism selection: hydrocarbons and Phytoremediation, 3(1): 13-40.
metals. Phytoremediation: Transformation and gu J Phycoremediation: key issues for
Control of Contaminants, 887-904. cost-effective nutrient removal processes.
Mishra VK, Tripathi B (2008). Concurrent removal Biotechnology Advances, 22(1): 81-91.
and accumulation of heavy metals by the three Olguín EJ Sánchez-Galván G (2010). Aquatic
aquatic macrophytes. Bioresource technology, phytoremediation: Novel insights in tropical
99(15): 7091-7097. and subtropical regions. Pure and Applied
Mojiri A, Aziz HA, Zahed MA, Aziz SQ, Selamat Chemistry, 82(1): 27-38.
MRB (2013) Phytoremediation of Heavy Oswald WJ, Gotaas HB (1957). Photosynthesis in
Metals from Urban Waste Leachate by sewage treatment. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng,
Southern Cattail (Typha domingensis). Inter J 122: 73-105.
Sci Res Environ Sci, 1. Padmavathiamma PK, Li LY (2007).
Monferrán MV, Pignata ML, Wunderlin DA (2012). Phytoremediation technology: hyper-
Enhanced phytoextraction of chromium by the accumulation metals in plants. Water, Air, and
aquatic macrophyte Potamogeton pusillus in Soil Pollution, 184(1-4): 105-126.
presence of copper. Environmental Pollution, Pant D, Singh P (2013). Pollution due to hazardous
161: 15-22. glass waste. Environmental Science and
Moreno FN, Anderson CW, Stewart RB, Robinson Pollution Research, 1-23.
BH (2008). Phytofiltration of mercury- Pilon-Smits E (2005). Phytoremediation. Annu. Rev.
contaminated water: volatilisation and plant- Plant Biol., 56: 15-39.
accumulation aspects. Environmental and Pivetz BE (2001). Ground Water Issue:
Experimental Botany, 62(1): 78-85. Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and
Mueller B, Rock S, Gowswami D, Ensley D (1999). Ground Water at Hazardous Waste Sites, DTIC
Phytoremediation decision tree. Prepared by– Document.
Interstate Technology and Regulatory Prasad M (2004). Phytoremediation of metals and
Cooperation Work Group, 1-36. radionuclides in the environment: the case for
Mukhopadhyay S, Maiti S (2010). Phytoremediation natural hyperaccumulators, metal transporters,
of metal enriched mine waste: a review. Glob J soil-amending chelators and transgenic plants.
Environ Res, 4: 135-150. Heavy metal stress inlants: from biomlecules to
ecosystems, 345-392.
216
Faraji
Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Methods

Rajkumar K, Sivakumar S, Senthilkumar P, Prabha D, Shao X, Cheng H, Li Q, Lin C (2013). Anthropogenic


Subbhuraam C, Song Y (2009). Effects of Atmospheric Emissions of Cadmium in China.
selected heavy metals (Pb, Cu, Ni, and Cd) in Atmospheric Environment.
the aquatic medium on the restoration potential Sheoran V, Sheoran A, Poonia P (2009).
and accumulation in the stem cuttings of the Phytomining: A review. Minerals Engineering,
terrestrial plant, Talinum triangulare Linn. 22(12): 1007-1019.
Ecotoxicology, 18(7): 952-960. Shiyab S, Chen J, Han FX, Monts DL, Matta FB, Gu
Rawat I, Ranjith Kumar R, Mutanda T, Bux F (2011). M, Su Y, Masad MA (2009). "Mercury‐induced
Dual role of microalgae: phycoremediation of oxidative stress in Indian mustard (Brassica
domestic wastewater and biomass production juncea L.). Environmental toxicology, 24(5):
for sustainable biofuels production. Applied 462-471.
Energy, 88(10): 3411-3424. Sivasubramanian V, Subramanian V, Muthukumaran
Reichenauer TG, Germida JJ (2008). M (2010). Bioremediatio n of Chrome-Sludge
Phytoremediation of organic contaminants in from an Electroplating Industry Using the
soil and groundwater. ChemSusChem, 1(8‐9): Micro Alg a Desmococcus olivaceus–A pilot
708-717. study. J. Algal Biomass Utln, 3: 104-128.
Ridzuan MBB, Yeoh DEC, Hung YT (2010). Heavy Stout L, Nüsslein K (2010). Biotechnological
Metal Removal by Crops from Land potential of aquatic plant–microbe interactions.
Application of Sludge. Environmental Current opinion in biotechnology, 21(3): 339-
Bioengineering, Springer: 211-232. 345.
Romeh A (2009). Phytoremediation of Water and Soil Sun G, Shi W (1998). Sunflower stalks as adsorbents
Contaminated with Imidacloprid Pesticide by for the removal of metal ions from wastewater.
Plantago Major, L. International Journal of Industrial & engineering chemistry research,
Phytoremediation, 12(2): 188-199. 37(4): 1324-1328.
Römkens P, Bouwman L, Japenga J, Draaisma C Sung M, Lee CY, Lee SZ (2011). Combined mild soil
(2002). Potentials and drawbacks of chelate- washing and compost-assisted
enhanced phytoremediation of soils. phytoremediation in treatment of silt loams
Environmental pollution, 116(1): 109-121. contaminated with copper, nickel, and
Roongtanakiat N (2009). Vetiver phytoremediation chromium. Journal of hazardous materials,
for heavy metal decontamination. PRVN 190(1): 744-754.
Technical Bulletins(2009/1). Tu C, Ma LQ, Bondada B (2002). Arsenic
Safonova E, Kvitko K, Iankevitch M, Surgko L, Afti accumulation in the hyperaccumulator Chinese
I, Reisser W (2004). Biotreatment of Industrial brake and its utilization potential for
Wastewater by Selected Algal‐Bacterial phytoremediation. Journal of Environmental
Consortia. Engineering in life sciences, 4(4): Quality, 31(5): 1671-1675.
347-353. Tu S, Ma LQ, Fayiga AO, Zillioux EJ (2004).
Sahu R, Naraian R, Chandra V (2007). Accumulation Phytoremediation of arsenic-contaminated
of metals in naturally grown weeds (aquatic groundwater by the arsenic hyperaccumulating
macrophytes) grown on an industrial effluent fern Pteris vittata L. International Journal of
channel. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water, 35(3): 261- Phytoremediation, 6(1): 35-47.
265. Türker OC, Böcük H, Yakar A (2013). The
Sánchez-Galván G, Monroy O, Gómez J, Olguín EJ phytoremediation ability of a polyculture
(2008). Assessment of the hyperaccumulating constructed wetland to treat boron from mine
lead capacity of Salvinia minima using effluent. Journal of hazardous materials.
bioadsorption and intracellular accumulation Ucer A, Uyanik A, Kutbay HG (2013). Removal of
factors. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 194(1- Heavy Metals Using Myriophyllum
4): 77-90. verticillatum (Whorl-Leaf Watermilfoil) in a
Sarkar B (2002). Heavy metals in the environment, Hydroponic System. Ekoloji Dergisi, 22(87).
CRC Press. van der Ent A, Baker A, van Balgooy M, Tjoa A
Schnoor JL, Licht LA, McCutcheon SC, Wolfe NL, (2013). Ultramafic nickel laterites in Indonesia
Carreira LH (1995). "Phytoremediation of (Sulawesi, Halmahera): Mining, nickel
organic and nutrient contaminants. hyperaccumulators and opportunities for
Environmental Science & Technology, 29(7): phytomining. Journal of Geochemical
318A-323A. Exploration.
Vangronsveld J, Herzig R, Weyens N, Boulet J,
Adriaensen K, Ruttens A, Thewys T, Vassilev
217
Wastewater Engineering: Types, Characteristics and Treatment Technologies
Chapter 7: Wastewater Treatment by Phytoremediation Technologies

A, Meers E, Nehnevajova E (2009). Submerged Macrophytes: Looking for


Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and Hyperaccumulators in Eutrophic Lakes.
groundwater: lessons from the field. Environmental science & technology, 47(9):
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 4695-4703.
16(7): 765-794. Xue S, Chen Y, Reeves RD, Baker AJ, Lin Q,
Verma V, Singh Y, Rai J (2007). Biogas production Fernando DR (2004). Manganese uptake and
from plant biomass used for phytoremediation accumulation by the hyperaccumulator plant
of industrial wastes. Bioresource Technology, Phytolacca acinosa Roxb.(Phytolaccaceae).
98(8): 1664-1669. Environmental Pollution, 131(3): 393-399.
Vishnoi SR, Srivastava P (2007). Phytoremediation– Yamagata N (1979). Industrial emission of cadmium
Green for Environmental Clean. Proceedings of in Japan. Environmental Health Perspectives,
Taal2007: The 12th World Lake Conference. 28: 17.
Wand H, Kuschk P, Soltmann U, Stottmeister U Yang L, Wu Z, Wu J, Zhang Y, Li M, Lin Z,
(2002). Enhanced removal of xenobiotics by Bañuelos G (2013). Simultaneous removal of
helophytes. Acta biotechnologica, 22(1‐2): 175- selenite and electricity production from Se-
181. laden wastewater by constructed wetland
Wang KS, Huang LC, Lee HS, Chen PY, Chang SH coupled with microbial fuel cells. Selenium in
(2008). Phytoextraction of cadmium by the Environment and Human Health, 212.
Ipomoea aquatica (water spinach) in Yifru DD, Nzengung VA (2008). Organic carbon
hydroponic solution: Effects of cadmium biostimulates rapid rhizodegradation of
speciation. Chemosphere, 72(4): 666-672. perchlorate. Environmental Toxicology and
Wang X, Dossett MP, Gordon MP, Strand SE (2004). Chemistry, 27(12): 2419-2426.
Fate of carbon tetrachloride during Yoon J, Cao X, Zhou Q, Ma QL (2006).
phytoremediation with poplar under controlled Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native
field conditions. Environmental science & plants growing on a contaminated Florida site.
technology, 38(21): 5744-5749. Science of the Total Environment, 368(2): 456-
Wang Z, Calderon MM (2012). Environmental and 464.
economic analysis of application of water Zavoda J, Cutright T, Szpak J, Fallon E (2001).
hyacinth for eutrophic water treatment coupled Uptake, selectivity, and inhibition of
with biogas production. Journal of hydroponic treatment of contaminants. Journal
environmental management, 110: 246-253. of environmental engineering, 127(6): 502-508.
Ximénez-Embún P, Madrid-Albarrán Y, Cámara C, Zhang XH, Liu J, Huang HT, Chen J, Zhu YN, Wang
Cuadrado C, Burbano C, Múzquiz M (2001). DQ (2007). Chromium accumulation by the
Evaluation of Lupinus Species to Accumulate hyperaccumulator plant Leersia hexandra
Heavy Metals From W aste Waters. Swartz. Chemosphere, 67(6): 1138-1143.
International Journal of Phytoremediation, 3(4): Zhang X, Zhao FJ, Huang Q, Williams PN, Sun GX,
369-379. Zhu YG (2009). Arsenic uptake and speciation
Xing W, Wu H, Hao B, Huang W, Liu G (2013). in the rootless duckweed Wolffia globosa. New
Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals by Phytologist, 182(2): 421-428.

218

View publication stats

Вам также может понравиться