Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com )
Copyright ° 1
Family Data:
The father Vincenzo Galilei (1520-1591) belonged to an old, but impover-
ished noble family from Florence and was a drapery dealer. He was good in
mathematics and taught music. The mother was Giulia Ammannati (1538-
1620). The parents lived in the countryside nearby Pisa.
Galileo was his parent’s first child, other surviving children were Michelan-
gelo, Virgina and Livia. When Galileo was eight years old his parents re-
turned to Pisa.
Galilei was not married but lived together with Marina Gamba from Venice
from 1599 to 1610; they had three children Virginia, Livia and Vincenzio.
The two daughters entered convents and became nuns: Maria Celeste and
Arcangela. In 1613, Marina Gamba married Giovanni Bartoluzzi.
Education:
Galileo was at first raised in the cloister St. Maria of the Camaldulensian
order in Vallombrosa, where he liked to stay and where his gift in literature
and his inventivness for mechanics were much admired. He also had private
lessons in mathematics from the mathematician Ostilio Ricci (1540-1603).
Galileo would have liked to join the order, but his father prevented him to
do so. With 16 years Galileo finished school.
In 1581 Galileo was sent to study medicine at the University of Pisa, but
Galileo found his love for mathematics and therefore discontinued to study
medicine in 1585.
Galileo made his further studies in physics privately.
Professional Career:
In 1589, Galilei was applied professor for mathematics at the University of
Pisa. In 1592 he succeeded in getting a chair at the University of Padua
as a result of his connections with Ferdinando dei Medici. Padua was under
Venetian rule at that time and was recognized as the most modern University
c by Stochastikon GmbH (http: // encyclopedia. stochastikon. com )
Copyright ° 2
(erected in 1222). Galilei stayed there for 18 years till 1610. Then he moved
to Florence, where he became “Mathematicus primarius” of the Medici Duke
and of the University of Pisa. After 1613 Galilei lived in his house in Arcreti
nearby Florence. Probably the Medici sustained him.
Galilei worked on physical problems, especially falling bodies, but he became
famous as an astronomer. By means of the lens, then newly invented by
the Dutch (Galilei heard about them in 1609), he constructed telescopes
and made astronomical observations. He found the sunspots, the satellites
of Jupiter and Saturn’s rings. Galilei believed in the heliocentric system of
Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543), but was afraid to make a fool of himself.
The movements of the Jupiter satellites Galilei observed by telescope seemed
to prove the Heliocentric system, and he propagated it. Therefore Galilei
was accused at the Holy Office in 1615. In 1616 the Holy Office declared the
heliocentric system to be wrong and in contradiction to the Holy Scripture,
which considered the world being immovable. Further publications about
the subject were forbidden. But Galilei was not forced to abjure. Also Pope
Urban VIII, who was an admirer of Galilei, did not propagate the Copernican
world view. In 1632 Galilei published his Dialogo, which violated the Decree
of 1616. He had to come to Rome in 1632 and after trials by theologians
found to be guilty. In 1633 he recanted the Copernican world view. He had
to live in his Villa in Arcreti, but then permitted to return and secretly wrote
his Discorsi.
The Dialogo was only taken from the index of prohibited books in 1835. In
1992 Galilei was officially rehabilitated by Pope John Paul II.
In principle Galileo Galilei found no new findings to the theory of estimation,
but by his propagation of the definite laws of nature became an important
supporter of a deterministic world view.
Galilei became also known for the fact that his works were not published in
Latin, but in Italian.
In 1609 Galilei became member of the Accademia dei Lincei in Rome.
Publications:
• Between 1613 and 1623 Galilei wrote about the game of dice, but there
c by Stochastikon GmbH (http: // encyclopedia. stochastikon. com )
Copyright ° 3
exists only a piece: “Sopra le Scoperte dei Dadi”, in: Dialogo dei mas-
simi sistemi (Milano 1936; Milano 1999), Opera Omnia (1718), En-
glish: Dialogue of the great world systems: in the Salisbury translation
(Chicago 1957), translation by Thorne, in: David, Games, Gods and
Gambling..., pp. 192-195.
Scientific Awards:
In 1611 Galilei was admitted as sixth member into the Accademia dei Lincei.
A lunar crater, a Rima Galilaei and a street in Paris bear his name.
c by Stochastikon GmbH (http: // encyclopedia. stochastikon. com )
Copyright ° 5
Bibliography:
• Charles Coulston Gillespie (ed.), Dictionary of scientific biography, vol. V
(New York 1972) pp. 237-250.
• Nicole Albers, On the relevance of adhesion: applications to Saturn’s rings
(Potsdam 2006).
• W.W.R. Ball, A Short Account of the History of Mathematics (New York
2001) pp. 247-251.
• Cesare Barbieri, The three Galileos: the man, the spacecraft, the telescope.
Proceedings of the Conference held in Padova, January 7-10, 1997 (Dordrecht
1997).
• Andrea Battestini, Galileo e i gesuiti: miti letterari e retorica della scienza
(Milano 2000).
• Frederic J. Baumgartner, “Galileo’s French correspondents”, Annals of Sci-
ence 45 (1988) pp. 169-182.
• Françoise Belibar, Galilée et Einstein: petite conférence sur la science
(Paris 2006).
• Erico Bellone, La stella nuova: l’evoluzione e il caso Galilei (Torino 2003).
• Antonio Beltrán Marı́, Talento y poder: historia de las relaciones entre
Galileo y la Igelsia católica (Pamplona 2007).
• Natale Benazzi, Il libro nero dell’Inquisizione: la ricostruzione dei grandi
processi (Casale Monferrato (Alessandria) 1998).
• Vieri Benci, Determinism, holism and complexity (New York 2003).
• Marco Beretta, Sidereus nuncius & Stella Polaris: the scientific relations
between Italy and Sweden in early modern history (Canton, Mass. 1997).
• Francesco Beretta, Galilée devant le Tribunal de l’Inquisition: une relecture
des sources (1998).
• Ottavio Besomi, Galileo e il Parnaso Tychonico: un capitolo inedito del
dibattito sulle comete tra finzione letteraria e trattazione scientifica (Firenze
2000).
• Mario Biagioli, Galileo’s instruments of credit: telescopes, images secrecy
(Chicago 2006).
• Mario Biagioli, Galileo, courtier: practice of science in the culture of abso-
lutism (1993; 1994; Chicago 2006), German: Galileo, der Höfling: Entdeck-
ungen und Etikette: vom Aufstieg der neuen Wissenschaft (Frankfurt 1999).
• Hans Bieri (ed.), Der Streit um das kopernikanische Weltsystem im 17.
Jahrhundert: Galileo Galilei’s Akkommodationstheorie und ihre historischen
Hintergründe (Bern 2007).
• Dus̆an Bjelić, Galileo’s pendulum: science, sexuality, and the body-instrument
link (Albany 2003).
• Richard J. Blackwell, Science, religion and authority: lessons from the
Galileo affair (Milwaukee 1998).
c by Stochastikon GmbH (http: // encyclopedia. stochastikon. com )
Copyright ° 6
• David Marshall Miller, “The thirty years war and the Galileo affair”, His-
tory of Science 46 (2008) pp. 49-74.
• Fabio Minazzi, Galileo “filosofo geometra” (Milano 1994).
• Jean Deitz Moss, Novelties in the heavens: rhetoric and science in the
Copernican controversy (Chicago 1993).
• Atle Næss, When the world stood still (Berlin 2005), German: Als die Welt
still stand: Galileo Galilei (Berlin 2006).
• R.H. Naylor, “Galileo and the problem of the free fall”, British Journal for
the History of Science 7 (1974) pp. 105-134.
• R.H. Naylor, “Galileo: real experiment and didactic demonstration”, Isis
67 (1976) pp. 398-419.
• R.H. Naylor, “Galileo’s theory of motion: processes of conceptual change
in the period 1604-1610”, Annals of Science 34 (1977) pp. 365-392.
• R.H. Naylor, “The role of experiment in Galileo’s early work on the law of
fall”, Annals of Science 37 (1980) pp. 363-378.
• Ippolito Nievo, Gli ultimi anni di Galileo Galilei (Venezia 2006).
• Giancarlo Nonnoi, Saggi galileiani: atomi, immagini e ideologia (Cagliari
2000).
• Y. Ogawa, “Galileo’s work on free fall at Padua: Some remarks on Drake’s
interpretation”, Historia Scientiarum 37 (1989) pp. 31-49.
• José Ortega y Gasset, En torno a Galileo (Madrid 2005).
• Carla Rita Palmerino (ed.), The reception of Galilean science of motion in
seventeenth century Europe: Colloquium Amsterdam 2000 (Boston 2004).
• Paolo Palmieri, “’Spuntar lo scoglio più duro’: did Galileo ever think the
most beautiful thought experiment in the history of science?”, Studies in
History and Philosophy of Science 36 (2005) pp. 223-240.
• Paolo Palmieri, “A new look at Galileo’s search for mathematical proofs”,
Archive for History of Exact Sciences 60 (2006) pp. 285-317.
• Paolo Palmieri, Reenacting Galileo’s experiments: rediscovering the tech-
niques of the seventeenth-century science (Lewiston 2008).
• Antonino Pellicanò, Del periodo giovanile di Galileo Galilei: il Trattato di
fortificazione; alle radice del pensiero scientifico e dell’urbanistica moderni
(Roma 2000).
• Antonino Pellicanò, Da Galileo Galilei a Cosimo Noferi: verso una nuova
scienza (Firenze 2005).
• Mauro Pesce, L’ermeneutica biblica di Galileo e le due strade della teologia
cristiana (Roma 2005).
• Pierluigi Pizzamiglio, L’astrologia in Italia all’epoca di Galileo Galilei:
(1550-1650); rassegna storico-critica dei documenti (Milano 2004).
• Paolo Ponzio, Copernicanesimo e teologia: scritture e natura in Cam-
panella, Galilei e Foscarini (Bari 1998).
c by Stochastikon GmbH (http: // encyclopedia. stochastikon. com )
Copyright ° 10
Version: 1.00