Ft ORTRCT OFCOUTRA count or sppeacs™ | aa) Aug 26 2019 District of Columbia Court of Appeals Nos. 18-AA-S00 & I8-AA-SO1 JAMES FOURNIER, et al, Petitioners, v DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF PLANNING, HPA 393-14 HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE, HPA 133-15 Respondent, and ‘VISION MCMILLAN PARTNERS, LLC, etal., Intervenors. ORDER On further consideration of this court's March 21, 2019, order that denied petitioner Otten’s motion for summary reversal and direct all pro se petitioners file either their respective brief and joint appendix or, if appropriate after this court's decision in Friends of MeMillan v. District of Columbia Mayor's Agent for Historic Preservation, Disirict of Columbia Office of Planning, 207 A.3d 1155 (D.C. 2019), ‘a motion to dismiss the petitions within 30 days; petitioner Wolkoff's motion for an of time to file his brief wherein he states the record is incomplete, the ns, and reply thereto; the joint motion to dismiss the petitions for review because petitioners failed to file their briefs and joint appendix, the oppositions, and reply thereto; and the motion of petitioner Wolloff to file the lodged opposition to the motion to dismiss; and it appearing that this appeal is limited to the order considered by this court in Friends of MeMillan v. District of Columbia Mayo) Agent for Historic Preservation, District of Columbia Office of Planning, No. 18- ‘AA-357 (D.C. May 16, 2019); and it further appearing the court denied the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc in the above case on August 22, 2019, itis ORDERED that petitioner Wolkof’s motion for leave to file the lodged opposition to the motion to dismiss is granted and the lodged document filed. ItisNos. 18-AA-500 & 18-AA-501 FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion is grant to the extent that petitioners shall, within 30 days from the date of the order, file thelr brief and joint appendix or the petitions for review will be dismissed. Because this appeal is limited to the order and record in no. 18-AA-357, the record has long been complete. Further, petitioner Wolkof?’s pending motion for an extension of time was filed on June 24, 2019; however, no brief has been lodged with the court, Tis FURTHER ORDERED that the m further order of the court. nto dismiss is held in abeyance pen BY THE COURT: ee STEPHEN H. GLICKMAN Acting Chief Judge Copies e-served to: Mary Brown, Esquire Philip Evans, Esquire Chris Otten’ Loren AliKhan, Esquire Solicitor General -DC James McKay, Esquire ‘fice of Auomey General = DCNos. 18-AA-500 & 18-AA-SO1 Copies mailed to: James Fournier ‘69 Bryant Street NW Washington, DC 20001 Linwood Norman 135 T Street NW ‘Washington, DC 20001 Jerome Peloquin 4001 9! Street NE Washington, DC 20017 Daniel Wolkoft 1231 Randolph Street NE ‘Washington, DC 20017 Cynthia Carson, Esquire 42 Adams Street NW Washington, DC 20001 ssa Peters 101 2 Street NW, Unit 41 ashington, DC 20001 Jenifer Simpson 48 Adams Street NW Washington, DC 20001 cml