BISM3208 CRITERIA SHEET: Team FinTech PROJECT (30%)

Criteria Outstanding Very Good Good Meets Expectations Below Expectations Serious Fail
PART A – Project Proposal (5%)
• Clear explanations of topic (0.5)
• Selection of target company (0.5)
• Motivation of this study (2)
• Preliminary research on topic (1)
• Group work plan including role & responsibility and possible data (1)
Development Deliverable sections Deliverable Most of the Though most of the While a few deliverable Your project idea
of project idea are all submitted sections are all deliverable sections deliverable sections sections are submitted, is undeveloped
with all of the submitted with are submitted, with are submitted, it is the project cannot and unclear.
objectives and aims most of the some of the sometimes difficult to proceed successfully Your project idea
of group project objectives and aims objectives and aims understand the without a major review of is not feasible.
comprehensively of the group requiring further objectives and aims of some of your objectives
and clearly outlined. project clearly clarification. the group project. and aims.
outlined. Clearer explanations
here would enhance
your project idea.
PART B – Project Report (15%)
• Executive Summary (1)
• Demonstrating a good understanding of topic (2)
• Identifying significant issues on a focal firm (3)
• Specifying available resources and its description (3)
• Identify and translate real-world business problems into IS strategy model (4)
• Providing relevant references including web, book and journal articles supports your arguments without them marks cannot be given.
• Organising a structured report format (e.g., title page, table of contents with pages numbered, executive summary, introduction, content well structured
with headings, recommendations, conclusions, references) (2)
Executive Your executive Your executive Your executive Your executive While some aspects of Your executive
Summary summary reflects an summary reflects a summary summary includes the topic and/or findings summary is
insightful and astute clear and relevant demonstrates a solid some elements have been mentioned in unclear and/or
overview of the overview of the understanding of the relevant to your topic your executive summary, lacks relevance
topic, findings and topic, findings and topic; a clearer and findings; a clearer your ideas are often to the topic,
implications of the implications of the connection between cohesiveness between disjointed making it findings and/or
project. The board project. The board your major findings the findings and difficult to understand the implications of
could sign-off on the could sign-off on and project implications of the purpose of your project. the project.
recommendations. the implications would project would
recommendations. enhance your strengthen your
executive summary. executive summary.
Understanding You provide an You provide a You provide a sound You demonstrate Your understanding of There is little, if
of topic insightful and comprehensive understanding of understanding of current issues lacks any,
comprehensive understanding of mostly relevant some important credible insight; this has understanding of
understanding of relevant issues, and issues, with some issues, though not all resulted in a lack of relevant issues
highly relevant how to apply these useful insights into of your insights are understanding of how to and/or how to
issues, and how best to the IS strategy how to apply these to relevant and/or apply these to the IS apply these to
to utilise the most model. the IS strategy model. applied in the best strategy model. the IS strategy
appropriate the IS way to the IS strategy model.
strategy model. model.
Explanation of You have cleverly You have astutely You have translated Though not always You have struggled to Little, if any,
IS Strategy translated real- translated real- most real-world useful, you have translate real-world translating of
Model world business world business business problems translated some real- business problems into real-world
problems into highly problems into into useful IS strategy world business useful IS strategy models. business
appropriate IS appropriate IS models. Theoretical problems into IS A better approach to problems into IS
strategy models. strategy models. and practical business strategy models. theoretical and practical strategy models.
Theoretical and Theoretical and analysis is mostly Though narrow in business analysis would Theoretical and
practical business practical business relevant. places, some assist here. practical
analysis is highly analysis is theoretical and/or business analysis
significant and significant and practical business was not
comprehensive. relevant. analysis was undertaken.
undertaken.
Conclusions Robust conclusions Insightful Solid conclusions Some useful Conclusions have not Conclusions
provided, supported conclusions provided, supported conclusions provided; been clearly supported by and/or solutions
by highly relevant provided, by mostly useful with mostly minor relevant solutions. Major lack merit.
and implementable supported by solutions. adjustments, some of adjustments are needed.
solutions. useful and the solutions are
implementable implementable.
solutions.
References and Your report is highly Your report is well Your report is well Your report is The presentation and Your report lacks
format organised and well organised and structured, with most structured but could structure of your report structure and
structured, with clearly structured, sources relevant be enhanced by a requires attention. organisation;
relevant sources with relevant and/or referenced more professional Sources have not always references are
correctly sources correctly correctly. presentation. Some been used appropriately incorrect and/or
referenced. referenced. sources have not been and/or there are major irrelevant.
used correctly and/or referencing errors.
have minor
referencing errors.
PART C – Poster Presentation (10%)
• Delivering topic and outcomes clearly (1)
• Providing critical analysis including IS business strategies (2)
• Suggesting robust and implementable solutions (2)
• Video presentation elements and timing (2)
• Poster presentation event elements including Q&A (3)
Project You astutely You chose well, You communicated Though not all of the Your choice of Little, if any,
overview, Main selected and clearly clearly most of the important information was information to significant
findings & communicated the communicating the aspects of your useful, you made a communicate showed a aspects of your
implications most important and relevant aspects of project. solid attempt at lack of awareness of the project were
relevant aspects of your project. communicating most relevant aspects of communicated
your project. interesting aspects of your project. clearly.
your project.
Quality of You manage Q&A You manage Q&A You manage most Though hesitant Many of your responses You struggled to
response – with confidence and with confidence, aspects of Q&A well, and/or lacking were superficial and/or answer questions
ease, responding to responding to all or with many questions confidence with some and/or lacked
Q&A (poster all questions clearly most questions responded to responses, you did not fully answer the confidence for
event) and correctly. correctly. appropriately. managed to answer question. the duration of
most questions. the Q&A.
Presentation You immediately You captured and Though you didn’t While you struggled to The audience struggled to The audience
technique captured and held audience immediately capture completely capture grasp the key points of was not
(Poster, video, strongly maintained interest for most of their interest, the and maintain audience your presentation; more interested in
and poster audience interest your presentation. audience was interest, some parts of attention to your your
prestation for the duration of attentive during most your presentation presentation technique presentation.
pitch) your presentation. aspects of your were interesting. can enhance this aspect.
presentation.

PART D – Peer Evaluation

• Peer evaluation is worth up to a 3 mark deduction or addition.
Marks may remain even or students may deduct marks from one student or more students these will be given to one or more students.
Deductions and additions must be evidence based. For example, records of attendance and contributions to group team meetings.
More information will provided with the evaluation on BlackBoard.