Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Executive Summary
Richmond’s Real Estate Tax Relief program reduces real estate taxes for seniors and disabled individuals with
incomes at or below $50,000. Eligible individuals can save between 30 to 100 percent on their real estate taxes,
depending on their income. It is a powerful program that helps vulnerable individuals stay in their homes amidst
rising real estate assessments and corresponding tax increases.1
Unfortunately, few eligible individuals are enrolled in the program. According to the City, roughly 2,500 individuals
are enrolled.2 This analysis finds there are between 6,900 and 7,800 residents who are eligible for the program but
are not enrolled in it. These residents are paying, on average, between $560 and $1,440 every year in additional
real estate taxes solely because they are unaware of the program or unable to enroll.
This analysis explains the Real Estate Tax Relief program’s eligibility criteria and why it is beneficial, estimates the
number of eligible individuals who are not enrolled in the program, and calculates how much money they could save
by participating in it. Finally, this report provides recommendations to the City to increase program enrollment.
This issue deserves attention now, both because the City has a responsibility to help connect eligible individuals to
benefits, and because program eligibility is set to expand on January 1, 2020. This paper analyzes enrollment under
the existing criteria. Recommendations to strengthen enrollment will be especially useful for educating individuals
who may become eligible under the expanded program.
2
Figure 2: Average Savings by Income Group
Median Taxes
Percent Average Taxes After
Income Range Home Without
Discount Tax Relief Relief
Value Relief
$0 - $20,000 100% $122,000 $1,440 $1,440 $0
$20,001 - $30,000 70% $144,000 $1,728 $1,210 $518
$30,000 - $40,000 35% $145,000 $1,740 $609 $1,131
$40,001 - $50,000 30% $155,000 $1,860 $558 $1,302
Strengthening Enrollment
The good news is that better is possible. Even a small increase in the participation rate from roughly 25 percent to
33 percent would benefit between 590 and 890 individuals without requiring additional funds. In fiscal year 2018,
the program budgeted $3 million but only spent $2.8 million. Raising the participation rate to 33 percent would
bring the total cost of the program up to the budgeted amount. The following recommendations would help the city
reach that target:
1. Clarify in the program brochure that an individual’s house and up to one acre of land do not count toward the
program’s $200,000 asset limit.
The program brochure states that applicants must “have assets (net worth) of less than $200,000.” It does
not include the key caveat that an applicant’s house and 1 acre of land are exempt from this asset limit. 30
percent of eligible individuals own homes with values at or above $200,000. These individuals may
incorrectly think they are ineligible if they were to learn about the program via the brochure.
2. All program materials should be available in Spanish and other commonly spoken languages on the
Department of Finance’s website.
8,820 Richmond City residents report that they do not speak English very well.4 Simply making the program
available in Spanish and other commonly spoken languages would boost participation.
3. Develop a tax relief calculator that can estimate an eligible individual’s potential savings and make it available
on the program website.
People participate in programs when they can easily understand the potential benefits. Individuals who think
they may be eligible should be able to enter their income and home value to estimate what they may be able
to save through the program.
4. Develop an Eligibility Triage Tool.
Similarly, there should be an eligibility triage tool on the program’s website. Individuals could enter their
household income, age, disability status, and net worth, and the tool would make a tentative eligibility
determination. This tool would allow individuals to confirm that they are eligible for tax relief before taking
the time needed to collect various income-eligibility documents for the application.
These are just a few recommendations to increase the program’s participation rate. Surely, there are many other
ideas to be considered.
3
Conclusion
Even the best-intentioned social benefit programs are only effective if they reach the people they are intended to
benefit. While Richmond’s Real Estate Tax Relief program can be extraordinarily valuable to those enrolled in it, how
can it be considered a success if three out of every four eligible individuals do not benefit?
If adopting policies that aide vulnerable families is a testament to our city’s values, implementing them well must be
a testament to our city’s spirit. Doing so requires a sustained effort throughout our community. Let us call on our
Mayor, councilmembers, and dedicated city employees to lead this effort.
Endnotes
1. Roberto Roldan, “Amid Gentrification, Little-Known Tax Relief Program Could Help More Richmond Seniors Age in Place,” WCVE,
2019.
2. Mark Robinson, "Richmond City Council Expands Tax Relief Program, Approves Semmes Avenue to Town Home Development,”
Richmond Times-Dispatch, 2019.
3. This estimate does not consider individuals’ household assets. Applicants must not have assets equal to or above $200,000,
discounting the value of his or her house and one acre of land.
4. 2013 – 2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table S1601
4