Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Source of Journal:
10.1186/s13065-019-0627-2
ARTICLE SUMMARY
The subject of the article is to review conclusive tests for determining and analyzing
cannabis, to be found on the consumers’ hair. It also elicited the concrete evaluation of
the circumstances where problems arise with the analysis of the THC metabolites.
The traditional analysis has been performed with the use of biological samples involving
saliva, blood and urine. The traditional samples were thoroughly stored to preclude
contamination that which yields erroneous data results. Of all three specimens, none of
which has a long window of detection. This has made the hair analysis more feasible for
it has wider window of detection for THC lasting up to a year. On the other hand, hair
analysis has been mostly used paralleled with the analysis for urine, blood, and saliva;
since, THC takes about 2 weeks to reach the hair shaft (cited in Shah, et. al, 2019).
Hair analysis involves sensitive instrumentation for screening THC with very low
concentration. However, for quantification, LC–MS/MS and GC–MS techniques are used
extensively.
It was observed that there is an increase consumption of THC within the public. Thus,
the systematic analysis of cannabis is imperative to view the current trends in the usage
and to arbitrate whether it is contaminated and correlates to health risks to its users.
ARTICLE CRITIQUE
(Marijuana, weed, Hashish) in human hair, is a publication funded by the United Arab
analyzing levels of cannabis dependence that could be used as a plausible evidence for
encapsulates PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ScienceDirect search engines. All
the information from the research was back-up with other article and supported by in-
text citation and referent list to support the literature review in introduction and research,
itself. The authors also contribute link to other article sources to make the research
more accurate and reliable. The journal was published in year 2019 and available to
read online and download with appropriate credits for the authors.
The parameters considered for review were hair sample collection, decontamination,
extraction, sample screening and confirmation analysis. Although the usages of hair
in the Court of Justice must be reviewed for validity; since, this is an unfamiliar
The aforementioned arguments are imperative to escalate the benefit and necessity for
biological testing specimens including saliva, urine and blood. This allows the research