Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

Leader: STA. MONICA, John Zedwin R.

12-Pascal

Members: ALGUSO, Azrielle M.

DELA CRUZ, Shane Flowers B.

HAUDAR, Maria Antonette C.

INOY, Angel Caroline

LARCENA, Sophia Nicole P.

SAGARIO, Pauline M.

TUQUERO, Angelica Patrice A.

Perspectives Family Education


Structural Functionalism

Social Conflict Economic inequality and Due to different curriculum


patriarchy are one of the the schools offer, it creates
social inequalities that a discrepancies in the learning
family can contribute. condition of the students.
Violence can be caused by a Also, this inequality in the
family, thus making it a lens of education exists,
conflict that arises in this especially when it comes to
society. the exams because not all
schools have the same
standard to follow when
generating examination, thus
social inequality is being
reinforced.
Symbolic Interactionism
Gender Conflict
Race Conflict Families contribute to social Racial conflict in schools are
inequality by passing down present in how institutions
beliefs and standards that handle the different ethnic
separate races from each backgrounds of their
other. The passing down of students. The use of tracking
these beliefs maintain and shows this in ways of
reinforce the status quo for prioritizing "faster" students.
every generation. For Standardized tests have been
example, whites before were found to favor more white,
brought up believing in middle-class students who
superiority over races of are also more likely to be
color. Having these tracked "up". Questions rely
standards prevent families mostly on the cultural
from building relationships knowledge of students,
with those of other races. therefore assuming that they
Society then does not know of or were brought up
develop because its base, the within that culture. Those of
family, keeps ethnic groups color are more likely to be
from each other. tracked "down". Even though
intellect should be its one
focus, tracking perpetuates
social inequality based on
social class, race and
ethnicity. Tracking brings
down the confidence of the
"less important" students,
making them perform worse.
Comparative In comparing Filipino and
American families, it can be
observed that culture is an
important factor that sets the
families apart. Filipinos are
known to have close family
ties; whether festive or
simple, get-togethers of clans
are natural for them.
Filipinos families also tend to
live together in one
household, consisting of
different age groups and
generations. Due to culture
and beliefs, Filipinos greatly
value their family's bond,
honor, and reputation.
Americans, on the other
hand, are not used to having
a large number of family
members under the same
roof. Teens who turn 18 or
21, whichever they deem is
the legal or appropriate age,
usually move out of the
house and live off on their
own, whether for their
university life or adult life.
Western culture views
children to be independent
at a certain age and must
therefore carry themselves
from there, but not
necessarily removing all
connections with their
families.
Historical Family is not only a biological The idea of education has
unit, but also a social been regarded as recent in
construct. Family originally Gray, PhD's article. The role
meant kinship based on of humans has been assumed
biology and marriage, and as as 'hunter-gatherer' which
time passed by, different resulted to the way of
terms have been linked to learning that encouraged
family. Terms such as people to gather experience
nuclear, extended, and single and knowledge by play and
families have been coined as exploration. By the start of
sociologists observed the agricultural era, people
different structures of a started to settle down and
family. Throughout history gather lands for themselves.
and different cultures, Their lands needed laborers
varying forms of family can which meant the time of
be identified. With the fact children for play and
that different meanings of exploration was removed.
family have been given, People depended on those
approaching it historically who had land and a kind of
would be a complex activity. slavery was formed. The will
LePlay posited that family is of the people, specially of the
not only the foundation, but children, were suppressed by
the determining element of the start of feudalism in the
all social organizations. The Middle Ages. Lessons were
functions of family in mainly about the obedience
different social problems of servants to their Lord and
were observed by master. Child labor was
sociologists in different time abused using the lack of
periods. Families adjust due education and removal of
to the needs that are posed free will. Many died and in
to them. Evidence to this is the 19th century, England
the concept of historians of limited the working hours of
Europe called proto- children. For various reasons,
industrialization which some religious and some
explained members for secular, the idea of universal,
factory labor through a compulsory education arose
transitional phase of and gradually spread.
household production in Education was understood as
which they participated as inculcation.The idea began to
laboring units spread that childhood should
(Mendels). It was also be a time for learning, and
observed by life-course schools for children were
historians that members of developed as places of
the family saw the learning. The idea and
importance of kinship ties as practice of universal,
adaptive strategies for their compulsory public education
own good. developed gradually in
Europe, from the early 16th
century on into the 19th.
Lutherans and Massachusetts
instilled religious knowledge
to children. The employers
saw that the duller the
subjects are in schools, the
better. On the other hand,
those who actually care for
the children aimed for them
to be scholars. In short,
people who are involved in
founding schools saw
schooling as inculcation, the
implanting of certain truths
and ways of thinking into
children's minds. People
started thinking that learning
is a children's activity. The
same power-assertive
methods that had been used
to make children work in
fields and factories were
quite naturally transferred to
the classroom. In recent
times, the methods of
schooling have become less
harsh, but basic assumptions
have not changed. Learning
continues to be defined as
children's work, and power-
assertive means are used to
make children do that work.

Вам также может понравиться