Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
&
• Endurance
Will this standard or benchmark provide students with knowledge that is of value
beyond a single test?
• Leverage
Will this standard or benchmark provide students with knowledge that is of value
in multiple disciplines?
• Readiness
Will this standard or benchmark provide students with knowledge that is required
for the next level of learning?
• Assessments
Do test specifications indicate a high level of priority?
Essential Question: What do our students need for success in school, in life, and
on the state tests?
3. In grade level teams, take 5 minutes to individually and silently mark benchmarks that you consider:
(a) absolutely essential, non-negotiable (mark with a ).
(b) possibly essential, not sure (mark with a ?).
Stick to the 5 minutes or everything will be marked.
4. Table Talk- Discuss what you marked. The goal of this discussion is to reach initial consensus.
Compare choices and note similarities and differences. Often these discussions will help clarify
differences of opinion. For example: A person may not have marked a particular standard because they
see it as part of the learning embedded in another standard.
5. Consult test specifications and cross check. Are the standards and benchmarks that you’ve chosen the
ones that the state has emphasized as most important? Revise your selections appropriately.
6. Chart or highlight the standards that you selected (write numbers and brief synopsis).
7. Look for “vertical flow.” Post the charts on the wall next to each other. Look for gaps, overlaps, and
omissions. Do the standards build vertically? Revise appropriately.
8. Sequence the Power Standards. Number them according to which need to be taught first, second, etc.
Standards can be divided into trimesters first, and then sequenced within the trimester.
I can retell a story, summarizing and sequencing the details with accuracy.
I can make a guess (infer) based on something I am reading and find the details to support my guess.
I can identify, explain, or describe examples of the text that support the author’s intended purpose.
“I can” statements are necessary to appropriately focus assessment questions and tasks.
2. Arrange (through discussion) the post-it notes on a table on a continuum from least rigorous to
most rigorous.
3. Identify questions or tasks that align with the level of rigor targeted through instruction.
4. Construct the assessment tool and identify administration window for all PLC members.
5. Create a question/task bank from remaining questions and tasks to be utilized for re-assessment
purposes or for laddering up or down.