Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
0-7803-6501-1/01/$10.0002001 IEEE. 51
magnitudes and phase angles of produced harmonics may be
&vi significantly different from theoretically calculated results.
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) = -x 1ooo/o
4 3. HARMONIC STUDY FOR AN INDUSTRIAL
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
where V I is the fundamental component, and vk is harmonic
component at harmonic order k. Industrial power distribution systems with non-linear loads
usually contain high harmonics. This paper demonstrates how
Harmonic Voltage and Current Calculations: This is to a comprehensive harmonic study is conducted for the
evaluate system harmonic voltages at system buses and purpose of reducing the system harmonic levels to comply
harmonic currents at system branches by conducting with national standard, and preventing harmonic resonant
harmonic load flow study. Harmonic sources are usually conditions at medium and low voltage buses.
modeled as harmonic currents injected at non-linear load
locations. The accuracy of the results depends on the 3.1 Study System Description
accuracies of the system model and harmonic source model. A simplified one-line diagram of the power distribution
system under consideration is shown in Figure 1 . The system
Frequency Scans: In this method, a unit harmonic current has four major 13.8 kV buses called Bus A, B, C, D, and a
injected at a harmonic source bus, and the frequencies of generator Bus, called Bus C. The utility supplies power via
harmonic current will sweep in a frequency range of interest. two three-winding transformers. To meet power factor
The system response at any location can be observed. The requirement, there are four 7.2MVAR 13.8kV capacitor
results can reveal the system resonant conditions. If any of banks on Bus A, B, D and E respectively. The four buses
the resonant frequencies is. close to a harmonic source feed approximately 90MW total load via 123 secondary
frequency, one can predict a high harmonic component in the distribution transformers. About 30% of the total load is
system. harmonic producing loads, such as DC drive and variable
speed drive systems. They are distributed in two groups at
Harmonic Measurentent: Harmonic components and Bus B and Bus E respectively. A major variable speed drive
harmonic distortion level can be determined by harmonic system, which is also a harmonic producing load, will be
measurements using harmonic analyzers and wave analyzers. connected to the Bus D in the near future. Due to the
The instruments shall provide magnitudes and phase angles presence of capacitor banks, potential harmonic resonances
of harmonic voltages and currents. The harmonic that can cause high harmonic levels may occur.
measurement of harmonic sources can be crucial to harmonic
study. This is because practically all non-linear loads are
usually operated under non-ideal operating conditions. The
Bus D Bus E
7.2MVAR
52
Table I : Measured Harmonics at Non-linear Loads
3.2 Harmonic Study Methodology The current injections of the harmonic source model are
placed at those non-linear load feeders. The harmonic load
In order to reach accurate results, the system must be flow study is then performed as Case 1A. The study gives
appropriately modeled. The following methodology is used voltage and current harmonics in the system. Compare the
in the study. calculated results with field-measured data at bus ties, utility
tie and feeders. It is confirmed they are close. This validates
Measure harmonics at all 13.8 kV bus feeds and major the system model. Table 2 shows the harmonic currents at the
bus tie branches. utility tie. The two highest components are the 5th and 7th
harmonics. By using the frequency scan technique, the
Establish the present system harmonic load flow
system resonance is close to 7th harmonic frequency as
computer model with harmonic sources modeled as
shown in Figure 2 . This is a parallel harmonic resonance.
current injections at all harmonic source locations.
Table 3 shows the comparison of IEEE STD 5 I9 harmonic
Perform a system harmonic calculation by harmonic current limitation with system harmonics. It indicates that
load flow study and compare the calculated results with although individual harmonic components satisfy the limits,
the field measurements at bus tie branches and load the total harmonic distortion (THD) level just exceeds the
feeders. If the calculated results are close to the field required limit.
measurements, the computer model can be accepted for
the harmonic study.
3.3.3 Harmonic Reduction with Harmonic Filters
Use the accepted computer model from (3) to calculate
To reduce total harmonic distortion at the utility tie, a
harmonics under various system operating conditions,
harmonic reduction measure is necessary. Two tuning
and determine harmonic reduction measures.
reactors are added to capacitors at harmonic source locations,
Use the frequency scan method to examine system Bus B and Bus E. The series connection of the reactor with
resonant conditions and verify the results of harmonic the capacitor forms each harmonic filter. The reactors are
reduction measures. sized to achieve single-frequency harmonic filters at the
desired frequency. Since the highest harmonic component
generated from all harmonic sources is the 5th harmonic
3.3 Harmonic Evaluation in Present System order, the reactors are tuned to form 5th harmonic filters.
With the installation of tuning reactors, the harmonic load
3.3.1 Field Harmonic Current Measurements flow study is performed as Case 1B. Table 2 shows the result
of harmonic current at the utility tie. All harmonic
Table 1 shows some of the harmonic spectrum measured at components and THD are reduced significantly, which satisfy
the non-linear loads. The Sh harmonic is the highest the required limitation as shown in Table 3. The frequency
component at all non-linear loads. scan result shown in Figure 3 indicates magnitudes of the
resonances are much lower than those in Case IA, and none
of the resonant frequencies is close to the system harmonic
3.3.2 Present System Harmonic Load Flow Modeling frequencies.
53
1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.t
Harmonic
54
supplying power to the drive systems. In the case without
Table 2: Harmonic Currents a t Utility harmonic cancellation, all six transformers are A N
configuration. In conjunction with or without harmonic filters
I Harm. I Case 1A I Case 1B I (at Bus B, D and E) for each above scheme, there are four
cases to be considered here. Specifically, they are:
147.794 147.434
Case 2A: without harmonic cancellation, without harmonic
0.000 0.000
filter,
8.280 0.000
7.562 1.570 Case 2B:' with harmonic cancellation, without harmonic
I 9 I 0.000 I 0.000 I filter,
1 11 I 0.776 1 0.069 I Case 2C: without harmonic cancellation, with harmonic
I 13 I 0.106 I 0.099 1 filter,
1 15 I 0.000 1 0.000 1 Case 2D: with harmonic cancellation, with harmonic filter.
I 17 I 0.029 I 0.237 I
The study is based on the assumption that the drive controls
21 0.000 I 0.000 (firing angles) within each pair of harmonic cancellation are
23 0.004 0.032 identical although the load sizes are not the same. The results
25 0.001 0.009 of harmonic study are shown in Table 4, and their IEEE STD
519 compliance at the utility interface is shown in Table 5 . It
should be noted that the results of harmonic cancellation is
Table 3: Comparison of Harmonics (%) to IEEE Std 519 under the ideal situation. In reality, the effectiveness of the
cancellation would be less than that of ideal conditions. The
Harm. harmonic cancellation scheme can reduce the system
harmonic level noticeably. However, the reduced harmonic
level may still be too high as in Case 2B. With the harmonic
filters, the harmonic level is effectively reduced to a very low
level, and the harmonic cancellation scheme becomes
insignificant when comparing Case 2C with Case 2D.
ICase 1BI 1.081 0.071 0.161 0.021 01 1.091
I
condition. Since there is no harmonic filter, the harmonic
Limits 6.00 2.75 2.50 1.00 0.50 7.50
currents from the sources are further magnified by the
Case2A 19.85 1.70 0.05 0.00 0.00 20.93
resonance, and penetrate into the transformer-capacitor
I Case 2B I 10.201 1.701 0.021 0.001 0.001 10.891 circuit. Figure 5 shows the frequency of the dominant
I Case2C I 3.711 0.591 0.381 0.021 0.00) 3.801 resonance at the 7'h harmonic.
I Case 2D I 2.231 0.59) 0.171 0.021 0.001 2.351
To reduce the harmonic level, the harmonic filter can be
considered as in previous section. However, as an alternative
harmonic reduction measure, a careful resizing of the
3.5 Effect of Capacitors at Low Voltage Buses
capacitor may also achieve the objective. In Case 3B and
Low voltage capacitor banks provide flexible VAR control Case 3C, the capacitor size is changed to 400 kVAR and 300
by switching on-off with associated loads. However, with the kVAR respectively. The harmonics are reduced significantly
presence of non-linear loads in the system, the capacitors to relatively low levels as shown in Table 6. The system
may cause series resonance with its immediate upstream resonant conditions are shown in Figure 5 and 6 for Case 3A
transformer as illustrated in Figure 4. At high frequencies, the and Case 3C respectively by the frequency scan method.
equivalent impedance of the inductive load and capacitor will With the capacitor resizing, the magnitude of original
become capacitive. This capacitive impedance, along with resonance at 7th harmonic frequency is substantially reduced
transformer impedance, forms an RLC series branch. At a in Case 3C as shown in Figure 6.
certain frequency the reactance of the impedance can be zero.
The frequency is a series resonant frequency. If the resonant
Table 6: Harmonic Currents at a 480V Capacitor
frequency is close to one of the system harmonic frequencies,
the harmonic current can easily penetrate into the branch.
I Case 3B I I
This can result in very high level of harmonics and cause Case 3A
1 CapipCIO I
Case 3~
1
excessive heat at the transformer and related equipment. It Cap.=500 Ca;i;(10
'may also cause some control equipment malfunctions.
Harm.
kVAR
I
%of I %of1
Order Amus Fund. Amus Fund. Amm Fund.
1 %of I 1
1 610.0631 - 1j(.l061 - i(64.3881 -
Harmonic I 3 0.000 0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000 0.00%
Flow I 13.8kV 5 24.302 3.98% 16.412 3.38% 10.645 2.92%
7 323.006 52.95% 125.1 92 25.75% 52.523 14.41%
9 0.000I 0.00%I 0.000I 0.00%I 0.000I 0.00%I
T 4 8 0V 11 9.9751I 1.64%1 12.9051 2.65%1 24.7851 6.80%1I
I I I I
13
Capacitor -r -I + Load
15
17
19 I I I I I I
21 0.0001 O.OO%l 0.0001 O.OO%l 0.0001 O.OO%l
23 0.003 0.00% 0.003 0.00% 0.003 0.00%
Figure 4: Transformer-Capacitor Circuit 25 0.003 0.00% 0.003 0.00% 0.003 0.00%
ITiE
56
1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0
Harmonic
1.0 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0
__________ -______-___-
Harmonic _________
57
4. CONCLUSIONS
5. REFERENCES
IEEE Std. 5 19- 1994, “IEEE Recommended Practice
and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electrical
Power systems”
J. Arrillaga, D. A. Bradley and P. S . Bodger “Power
System Harmonics”, John Willey & Sons, 1985
A. A. Mahmoud & R. D. Shultz “A Method for
Analyzing Harmonic Distribution in AC Power
Systems”, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and
Systems, Vol. PAS- 101, No. 6, June 1982.
A. P. Meliopoulos & G. J. Cokkinides “Effect of
Modeling on the Accuracy of Harmonic Analysis”,
IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, 1991.
58