Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com
Presenter logo
Supply Chain
Constraint:
In the market
In manufacturing
Cash flow
Suppliers of raw materials
And…
Constraint in the procurement function!
www.tocpractice.com 42 TOCPA International Conference
Presenter’s
logo
Company Success
Organisation
Planning attributes Typical MRP Attributes Effects on the Organisation
MRP uses a forecast or master production schedule as an Forecast accuracy at the individual SKU and part levels is
input to calculate parent and component level part net highly inaccurate. Build plans and purchase orders (PO’s) that
requirements. Part planning becomes based on a “push” are calculated from this forecast often are misaligned with
created by these projected demand requirements. actual market demand. This leads to excessive expediting,
overtime, premium freight, increased inventory of the wrong
items and missed shipments.
MRP pegs down the Entire Bill of Material to the lowest Creates a complicated materials and scheduling profile that
component part level whenever available stock is less than can totally change with one small change at a parent item.
exploded demand. When capacity is scheduled finitely across all resources there
is massive schedule instability due to cascading slides from
material shortages.
MRP allows the release of work orders to the shop floor Work orders are released to the floor but cannot be started
without consideration of component parts availability. due to shortages. This leads to increased WIP, constantly
changing priorities and schedules, delays, lots of expediting,
and possibly overtime.
Lead time for parent part is the manufacturing lead time Manufacturing Orders are often released with dates that are
ONLY for the parent, regardless of the cumulative lead time impossible to achieve and/or without all component parts
for parent and lower level component parts. available.
Ptak, C and Smith, C, Beyond MRP – Meeting the Current Materials Synchronization Challenge. White paper. 2008.
www.tocpractice.com 42 TOCPA International Conference
MRP Effects on the Presenter’s
logo
Organisation
Stock Management Typical MRP Attributes Effects on the Organisation
Attributes
Fixed reorder quantity, order points, and Additional exposure to forecast inaccuracies resulting
safety stock that do not adjust to actual in increased expediting.
market demand or seasonality.
Only parts that hitting minimum or reorder Aggregate inventory visibility is limited, frequently
point are flagged for reorder. putting the company in a constant expedite mode.
Past due date requirements and orders to Every stock order looks the same, which means there
replenish safety stock are treated as “Due is no REAL priority. To determine real priorities
Now” requires massive attention, analysis and priority
changes.
Ptak, C and Smith, C, Beyond MRP – Meeting the Current Materials Synchronization Challenge. White paper. 2008.
with Consumption
The KEY to achieve “profitable availability of more SKU’s” is to replenish more frequently
based simply on actual consumption…
Procurement Maturity
Mostly monthly
Monthly, or bi-weekly
Weekly
Advanced DBM
b e g
D
a c d f
Stage Supplier Relationship Supply Chain Order Stock & Time Symptoms
Strategy Frequency Buffers
1 Elementary, making Substantial reliance Mostly Typical ERP Often out of stock on critical
Elemen turns to “win” (win/lose on Forecasting, and monthly min/max levels, items
tary relationship). Supplier MRP to determine MANY Substantial overstocking on
terms are often rigid, RM req’ments spreadsheets. many other items. In a
with very little signs of a Often a “broken” production environment “full-
partnership. MRP kitting” is a major challenge
system/process is High cost per Purchase Order
followed. (PO) placed on supplier
2 Little more advanced, Elements of Monthly, or Basic dynamic Availability increases (2-3%),
Progres reducing MOQ’s, LT’s, decoupling in the bi-weekly buffers overstocking reduces
sing etc. Consignment stock supply chain, (inventories reduce by 10-20%),
undecided about lead times reduce by at least 5-
the optimum 10%,
PTO/PTS ratio Cost per PO reduces
Stage Supplier Relationship Supply Chain Order Stock & Time Symptoms
Strategy Frequency Buffers
3 Elements of a Definite decoupling Weekly Advanced DBM Availability increases (5%),
Advanc partnership – some data at various stages in overstocking reduces
ed is exchanged the supply chain, (inventories reduce by 20% or
inventory being more), lead times reduce by up
moved upstream to 25%
Cost per PO further reduces
4 Best Tight partnership Suppliers keep Daily Optimum SKU Availability increases (by more
in Class relationship – all relevant most inventories mix approach, i.e than 20%), overstocking
data is shared inventory turns reduces (inventories reduce by
by SKU, ROI up to 50% or more), lead times
analysis reduce by at least 50% or more
Highly efficient cost per PO
ratio
Current SKU
Warehouses
Out SKUs
in Overstocking logo