Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Clauses of IS13920:2016:
Cl 5.2 For all buildings which are more than 3 storeys in height, the minimum
Cl 6.1.1 The member shall preferably have a width-to-depth ratio of more than
0.3.( b/D=300/450=0.67) OK
( 1/4Χ(4600-150-150))=1075mm>450mm OK
Table 6.1: Maximum sagging and hogging moment acting on each beam
Beam Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
No sagging hogging sagging hogging sagging hogging
moment moment moment moment moment moment
(kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
Left section Left section Mid section Mid section Right section Right section
39
18 146.26 192.884 0 20.77 146.25 192.88
To find reinforcement requirement at left section due to hogging moment 191.898 kN-m
b=300 mm
D=450 mm
Assuming 20mm diameter bars with 25mm cover for mild exposure condition (Table16,IS456:2000).
20
Effective cover, dʹ = 25 + = 35 mm
2
So, here we see that 𝑀𝑢 > 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 , means the section shall be doubly reinforced.
𝑀 191.898×106 𝑑′ 35
Corresponding to 𝑏𝑑𝑢2 = = 3.71 ≈ 3.70 and = 415 = 0.084 ≈ 0.1,
300×4152 𝑑
40
we get 𝑝𝑡𝑜𝑝 = 1.245%and 𝑝𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 = 0.304%
To find the reinforcement requirement at left section due to sagging moment 146.79 kN-m
𝑀𝑢 =146.79 kN-m
Here we see that 𝑀𝑢 > 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 , means the section shall be doubly reinforced.
𝑀 146.79×106 𝑑′ 35
Corresponding to 𝑏𝑑𝑢2 = = 2.84 and = 415 = 0.084 ≈ 0.1,
300×4152 𝑑
So, at this section we will provide maximum top reinforcement required and maximum bottom
reinforcement required. For hogging we have got 𝑝𝑡𝑜𝑝 = 1.245% ; 𝑝𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 = 0.304% and for
sagging we have got 𝑝𝑡𝑜𝑝 = 0.0252% and 𝑝𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 = 0.98%.
In terms of area,
1.245
Area of steel required at top = × 300 × 415 = 1550.025 𝑚𝑚2
100
0.98
Area of steel required at bottom = × 300 × 415 = 1220.1 𝑚𝑚2
100
1550.025
Number of bars required at top = 𝜋 = 4.934 ≈ 5 bars
×202
4
1220.1
Number of bars required at bottom = 𝜋 = 3.886 ≈ 4 bars
×202
4
0.24×√𝑓𝑐𝑘
Cl 6.2.1)b Tension steel ratio 𝑝𝑚𝑖𝑛 ≥ ( 𝑝𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.98>0.258) OK
𝑓𝑦
41
To find reinforcement requirement at right section due to hogging moment 211.104 kN-m
b=300 mm
D=450 mm
Assuming 20mm diameter bars with 25mm cover for mild exposure condition (Table16,IS456:2000).
20
Effective cover, dʹ = 25 + = 35 mm
2
So, here we see that 𝑀𝑢 > 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 , means the section shall be doubly reinforced.
𝑀 211.104×106 𝑑′ 35
Corresponding to 𝑏𝑑𝑢2 = = 4.086 ≈ 4.1 and = 415 = 0.084 ≈ 0.1,
300×4152 𝑑
To find the reinforcement requirement at right section due to sagging moment 135.294 kN-m
𝑀𝑢 = 135.294 kN-m
Here we see that 𝑀𝑢 < 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 , means the section shall be singly reinforced.
𝑀𝑢 135.294×106 𝑑′ 35
Corresponding to = = 2.618 ≈ 2.62 and = = 0.084 ≈ 0.1,
𝑏𝑑2 300×4152 𝑑 415
So, at this section we will provide maximum top reinforcement required and maximum bottom
reinforcement required. For hogging we have got 𝑝𝑡𝑜𝑝 = 1.368% ; 𝑝𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 = 0.433% and for
sagging we have got 𝑝𝑡𝑜𝑝 = 0 % and 𝑝𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 = 0.892%.
42
In terms of area,
1.368
Area of steel required at top = × 300 × 415 = 1703.16 𝑚𝑚2
100
0.892
Area of steel required at bottom = × 300 × 415 = 1110.54 𝑚𝑚2
100
1703.16
Number of bars required at top = 𝜋 = 5.424 ≈ 6 bars
×202
4
1110.54
Number of bars required at bottom = 𝜋 = 3.536 ≈ 4 bars
×202
4
0.24×√𝑓𝑐𝑘
Cl 6.2.1)b Tension steel ratio 𝑝𝑚𝑖𝑛 ≥ ( 𝑝𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 0.892>0.258) OK
𝑓𝑦
To find reinforcement requirement at mid section due to sagging moment 53.375 kN-m
𝑀𝑢 = 53.375 kN-m
Here we see that 𝑀𝑢 < 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 , means the section shall be singly reinforced.
𝑀 53.375×106 𝑑′ 35
Corresponding to 𝑏𝑑𝑢2 = = 1.033and = 415 = 0.084 ≈ 0.1,
300×4152 𝑑
Hogging moment in each load case at mid section is zero. So we will just provide minimum
reinforcement required.
0.306
Area of steel required at bottom = × 300 × 415 = 380.97 𝑚𝑚2
100
43
380.97
Number of bars required at bottom = 𝜋 = 1.21 ≈ 2 bars.
×202
4
4.6
𝑉𝑎𝐷+𝐿 = 𝑉𝑏𝐷+𝐿 = 1.2 × (7.74 + 19.065) × = 73.982 𝑘𝑁
2
𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 𝐴,ℎ
(i) 𝑝𝑡 = 1.26%, (ℎ𝑜𝑔𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑔) = 3.75 implies that 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 =193.75 kN-m
𝑏𝑑2
𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 𝐴,𝑠
(ii) 𝑝𝑏 = 1.01% , (𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑔) = 2.94 implies that 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 =151.9 kN-m
𝑏𝑑2
𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 𝐵,ℎ
(i) 𝑝𝑡 = 1.51% , (ℎ𝑜𝑔𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑔) = 4.56 implies that 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 =235.6 kN-m
𝑏𝑑2
𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 𝐵,𝑠
(ii) 𝑝𝑏 = 1.01% , (𝑠𝑎𝑔𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑔) = 2.94 implies that 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 =151.9 kN-m
𝑏𝑑2
𝐴,𝑠 𝐵,ℎ
𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 + 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚
𝑉𝑢,𝑎 = 𝑉𝑎𝐷+𝐿 − 1.4 [ ] = −52.18𝑘𝑁
𝐿𝐴𝐵
𝐴,𝑠 𝐵,ℎ
𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 + 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚
𝑉𝑢,𝑏 = 𝑉𝑎𝐷+𝐿 + 1.4 [ ] = 200.145𝑘𝑁
𝐿𝐴𝐵
𝐴,ℎ 𝐵,𝑠
𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 + 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚
𝑉𝑢,𝑏 = 𝑉𝑏𝐷+𝐿 − 1.4 [ ] = −38.56𝑘𝑁
𝐿𝐴𝐵
𝐴,ℎ 𝐵,𝑠
𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 + 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚
𝑉𝑢,𝑎 = 𝑉𝑏𝐷+𝐿 + 1.4 [ ] = 186.52𝑘𝑁
𝐿𝐴𝐵
𝑉𝑢,𝑎 = 186.52kN
44
𝑉𝑢,𝑏 = 200.145kN
200.145×103
𝜏𝑐 = 0.622𝑁/𝑚𝑚2(Table19,IS456:2000); 𝜏𝑐,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 2.8𝑁/𝑚𝑚2; 𝜏𝑣 = = 1.61 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
300×415
𝜋
𝐴𝑠𝑣 2 × 4 × 82
𝑠𝑣 = = = 122.686𝑚𝑚
0.819 0.819
𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑥 should not be greater than (d/4 = 415/4 = 103.75 )or (8Φ=8Χ20=160) (Clause 6.3.5, IS13920)
So,we provide 8mm two legged stirrups at a gap of 100mm upto a distance 2d(=0.83m) from
support. Beyond that, a gap of 200mm is provided between the stirrups.
45
26 4-12 φ 3-12 φ 3-12 φ 3-12 φ 5-12 φ 3-12 φ
27 4-12 φ 3-12 φ 2-12 φ 3-12 φ 4-12 φ 3-12 φ
28 5-12 φ 3-12 φ 3-12 φ 3-12 φ 4-12 φ 3-12 φ
Fig. 6.2: Beam section Fig. 6.3: Beam section Fig. 6.4: Beam section
at section A-A at section B-B at section C-C
46
For beam 18:
Fig. 6.5: Beam section Fig. 6.6: Beam section Fig. 6.7: Beam section
at section A’-A’ at section B’-B’ at section C’-C’
𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 20 N/mm2
𝑓𝑦 = 415 N/mm2
𝐿𝑒𝑓𝑓 2600
𝐷
= 300
= 8.67< 12
Mu = P u × e
101×106 = 435×103× e
e = 232.18 mm
𝐿 𝐷
𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 500 + 30 (Cl. 25.4, IS 456:2000)
4000 300
= +
500 30
= 18 mm < e
e> 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑃𝑢 435×103
= = 0.24
𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑏𝐷 20×300×300
𝑀𝑢 101×106
2
= = 0.19
𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑏𝐷 20×300×3002
𝑑′ 50
Now, = 300 = 0.16
𝐷
Reinforcement distribution
𝑃𝑢 𝑀𝑢
Referring to chart 33 of SP16, for = 0.24, = 0.19
𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑏𝐷 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑏𝐷2
𝑝𝑡
= 0.12
𝑓𝑐𝑘
𝑝𝑡 = 2.4 %
48
2160
Numbers of bar required = 314.16 = 6.87
𝑃 435×1000
(i) Here, axial stress = 𝑏𝐷𝑢 = = 4.83> 0.1𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 0.1×20 =2 𝑁⁄𝑚𝑚2
300×300
(ii) Minimum dimension of the member ≮ 15 ɸ(=15Χ20= 300 mm), [Cl. 7.1.1, IS 13920: 2016]
(iii) Shortest cross-section dimension /perpendicular dimension ≮0.4𝑓𝑐𝑘 [Cl. 7.1.2, IS 13920: 2016]
300
i.e.300 = 1 ≮0.45, Hence, OK.
Hogging moment resistance of beam heading in to the left face of the column at node 1 is zero and
sagging moment of resistance heading into right face of the column is zero. Hence factored shear
force becomes equal to zero.
Sway to left
Similarly, at node 1 for left sway the factored shear force is zero.
From the load combinationsTable 5-2the maximum shear force at node 1 of the column is 45.55kN.
100×𝐴𝑠𝑐
Percentage longitudinal reinforcement, Pt =
𝑏𝑑
100×2513.28
= = 3.15 %
300×250
49
Design shear strength, τc= 0.82 N/mm2 (from Table 19 of IS 456: 2000)
0.82×300×250
= = 61.5kN
1000
As the shear capacity is more than the factored shear force shear reinforcement has to be designed
for nominal shear force. [Cl. 26.5.1.6, IS 456: 2000]
0.87𝐴𝑠𝑣 𝑓𝑦 0.87×415×100.53
𝑠𝑣 = = = 302.5 mm
0.4×𝑏 0.4×300
Sway to right
Hogging moment of resistance heading in to the left face of the column at node 2 is zero (as there is
no beam heading into column at node 2)
Sagging moment of resistance heading into right face of the column is 313.75 kNm as per Table 6-8-
a
𝑏𝐿 𝑏𝑅
𝑉𝑢 = 1.4[(𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 + 𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 )/ℎ𝑠𝑡 ]
Where,
50
𝑏𝐿
𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 = Limiting moment of resistance of beam framing into column from the left
𝑏𝑅
𝑀𝑢,𝑙𝑖𝑚 = Limiting moment of resistance of beam framing into column from the right
ℎ𝑠𝑡 is the storey height.
0+69.375
𝑉𝑢 = 1.4[ ]= 24.28kN
4
Sway to left
Hogging moment of resistance heading in to the left face of the column at node 2 is zero (as there is
no beam heading into column at node 2)
Sagging moment of resistance heading into right face of the column is 381.73 kNm as per Table 6-8
a
0+50.112
𝑉𝑢 = 1.4[ ]
4
= 17.54 kN
100×𝐴𝑠𝑐
Percentage of steel Pt =
𝑏𝑑
100×2513.28
= = 3.15 %
300×250
Design shear strength, τc= 0.82 N/mm2 (from table 19 of IS 456: 2000)
0.82×300×250
= = 61.5kN
1000
As the shear capacity is more than the factored shear force shear reinforcement has to be designed
for nominal shear force. [Cl. 26.5.1.6, IS 456: 2000]
51
𝜋
Area of two legged stirrups, 𝐴𝑠𝑣 = 2× 4 ×82 = 100.53 mm2
0.87𝐴𝑠𝑣 𝑓𝑦 0.87×415×100.53
𝑠𝑣 = = = 302.5 mm
0.4×𝑏 0.4×300
Special confining reinforcement will provide over a length of lo towards the mid span of column
1 300
(i)4×minimum member dimension = = 75 mm
4
𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑔 20 300×300
𝐴𝑠ℎ = 0.18ℎ𝑠𝑣 (𝐴 − 1) = 0.18×75×250×415×(300×200 − 1)= 81.32 mm2
𝑓𝑦 𝑘
52
Table 6.3: Design of longitudinal reinforcement of exterior columns
𝑨𝒔𝒄
𝑴𝒖 𝑷𝒖
p% Area of
Maximum Maximum 𝒑
Column b d 𝑷𝒖 𝑴𝒖 Percentage steel
Node moment axial load
No. (mm) (mm) 𝒇𝒄𝒌 𝒃𝒅 𝒇𝒄𝒌 𝒃𝒅𝟐 𝒇𝒄𝒌 of steel Required
(kNm) (kN)
required (mm2 )
53
Table 6.5: Design of longitudinal reinforcement of exterior columns
54
Fig. 6.8: Reinforcement detail of column 1 and 2
55