Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
Learning Outcomes to be assessed:
2
POs to be Level of
WEIGHTING
SUBMISSION ASSESSMENT covered Thinking
DESCRIPTION LO1 LO2 LO3
WEEK DESCRIPTION
1
Program Outcomes at the department of Civil Engineering
PO1: Demonstrate broad knowledge of engagement with the fundamental practices and principles that underpin Civil Engineering
PO2: Think creatively and analytically to respond to emerging professional and entrepreneurial opportunities in Civil Engineering
PO3: Apply research skills and related information to investigate, solve and design complex problems in civil Engineering
PO4: Design, Select and Apply, technological knowledge, skills and modern tools for sustainable civil Engineering Practice
PO5: Demonstrate broad knowledge of financial management, risk assessment and business practices
PO6: Engage in continuous self-motivated learning and development of knowledge and skills as a professional engineer, contributing to the
profession and beyond
PO7: Communicate effectively with both engineering and non-engineering stakeholders
PO8: Function effectively within a typical multidisciplinary and multi-cultural engineering design team as a team member, manager or team
leader, recognizing health, safety and environmental issues
PO9: Displaying of professional behaviour and ethical practice in the context of engineering projects and community engagement
2
Levels of thinking according to Blooms Taxonomy
Knowledge
Recall of something encountered before but without having to change it, use it or understand it; facts.
Comprehension
Understanding the knowledge that has been acquired without needing to relate it to other information.
Application
Use of a learned concept to resolve some situation or solve a new problem in an appropriate way.
Analysis
Taking something learned apart into separate components for purposes of thinking about the parts and how they fit together.
Synthesis
Generating or creating something different by assembling or connecting ideas in a way that makes a whole.
Evaluation
Looking at the particular value of materials, information or methods in characterizing the whole.
2
1.0 Introduction to the Term Project
The term project is involved in designing a net zero building for a small family. This is an individual
project undertaken by all the enrolled students. Attendance in the workshop sessions are mandatory to
obtain the assessment marks. You may consult the lecturer/tutors during the office hours for further
clarifications.
Plan 2
Plan 1
4.0 Considerations;
You may consider the following details as a general guide only.
Building system
Aims: constructability, low energy intensive, environmental friendly, socially sustainable, design for
adaptability, cost effective.
Scope of issues: time and cost of construction, energy cost, green building rating, public acceptance
Examples: use of precast construction, use of timber, large span construction such as use of flat slab, use
of prestressed concrete, skip-floor system.
Justification: precast requires less on-site work compared to cast in situ; timber is renewable material;
large span construction allows flexibility in adapting the building function; skip-floor system allows fast-
tracked construction
4
Structural materials –
Scope of issues: greenhouse gas emission, consideration of recyclable, renewable, reusable materials
Examples: You can select the structural elements considering the material usage/alternative material/ or
use an elimination approach.
Justification: will lead to lower the carbon foot print, reduce waste, fact construction etc
2 Construction phase - Consider the impacts of construction on the social, environment and
economy and suggest processes to minimise these impacts
Consider the impact to include (but not limited to): the use of energy from transportation, equipment and
plant, the effect of construction activities on environment; the choice of construction methods on
economy; jobs creation in the society, LCAs, energy cost, risk assessment, project finances, public
review, etc.
Suggested references-
5
1 Introduction to none In class Individual projects
the term project
4 Workshop 5% Progress will be evaluated
Mentoring sessions and In class
considering the forthcoming
assessment
submissions
5 20% Drop box submission
Submission 1
8 Workshop 5% Mentoring sessions and In class
assessment
9 25% Drop box submission
Submission 2
11 Workshop 5% Mentoring sessions and In class
assessment
12 30% Submission 3 Drop box submission
Late submissions will be have 10% removed from their grade, per day the assignment is overdue.
For example, if a submission that is graded at 72% is 4 days overdue, the awarded mark is 32%.
An assessment more than seven (7) calendar days overdue will not be marked and will receive
0%.
-End of Brief-