Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

 Soapboxie»

 World Politics

A Reaction to Cory Aquino’s Speech


to the U.S. Congress
Updated on September 3, 2018

Jonas Rodrigo
more

Contact Author

President Aquino's Address to the U.S. Congress


When Former President of the Philippines Corazon C. Aquino gave a speech to the United States
Congress on September 1986, a little more than half a year after assuming the presidency, she
called on America to help the Philippines in preserving the freedom which the Filipinos have won for
themselves. Calling to, “restore democracy by the ways of democracy,” she aggrandized the role of
America in the world as the promoter of a righteous system of governance and further strengthened
the reputation of said country as a model for greatness.

Anti-Marcos Movements and the Martial Law Era


Cory’s speech was adorned by countless references to her husband—Former Senator Ninoy
Aquino—whom the Filipino nation had assigned as the poster boy for anti-Marcos movements. Her
speech even went so far as to connect Ninoy’s struggle with that of the whole nation, all the while
entwining their family’s history with the fate of the entire country. She justified her presence in front
of the U.S. Congress using figurative words and metaphorical language, alluding to her connection
with the late Ninoy on one hand and fulfilling her mandate to the Filipino people on the other.
She succeeded in her analysis of the Martial Law era regarding its origin and outcome. Marcos’
attempt to stop a 500-strong communist insurgency by imposing a restrictive policy only furthered
the Red Army’s reach; in fact, it has been said that the Communist Party had 16,000 members by
the end of Martial Law, making Marcos the Party’s biggest recruiter. President Cory said that the
Martial Law was like, “trying to stifle a thing with the means by which it grows,” acknowledging the
fact that the communist insurgency existed because of widespread economic inequality.

Philippines Foreign Debt and Preserving Democracy


She seems to have made a similar mistake, however, when she decided that the Philippines would
keep the $26 billion foreign debt it incurred during Marcos’ presidency. The reasoning was that since
we fought for honor, we should also honor the huge foreign debt, although its benefit never really
reached us as a nation. What is more questionable is that, after declaring that we will pay the debt,
she immediately asked for help in achieving that.
Cory Aquino appears to have the utmost confidence and trust in America that she invited the country
to help the Philippines in practicing and preserving its democracy. Looking at it from today’s
perspective, it seems like an open invitation for the former to aid the latter and subsequently use it
for its own strategic interests. We remember that the U.S. bases were evicted by a historic vote in
1991, during Cory’s term, but such was the work of many nationalist senators who carried the
lessons of Martial Law into their of service.

The Results of Her Speech


Not much has changed since the speech of Cory Aquino to the U.S. Congress in 1986. There is still
no genuine economic and social transformation agenda which was mentioned in her speech. Thirty
years on, we still owe a huge amount of money to various lending institutions, and in fact, our debt
has grown ever larger and now includes not only foreign banks but also local ones. Furthermore, the
communist insurgency which Martial Law sought to terminate is continually spreading and
deepening its roots. This is no wonder since inequality is increasing at a steady rate; President Cory
was right when she said that the communist insurgency feeds on economic deterioration. The most
important lesson we can learn from the speech, I think, is that we cannot entrust our redemption to
another sovereign state, and the only real solution to any type of rebellion is to address the causes.
Solving the root problem will encourage everything else to inevitably fall into place.

Вам также может понравиться