INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.
INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were
independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.
INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were
independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.
INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were
independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.
INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were
independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.
INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were
independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

vINTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.

INTERLOCKING CONFESSION: These are extrajudicial confessions which were

independently made without collusion, are identical with each other in their
material respects and confirmatory of the other. They are, therefore, also
admissible as circumstantial evidence against their co-accused implicated therein
to show the probability of the latter�s actual participation in the commission of
the crime.