Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
AUDIT PLANNING
AUDIT
PLANNING
Highlights of Technical
nical Clinic
BY
MAGDALENE
GDALENE
ANG
G
A
Ǥ
ϐ
Ǥǡ
Ƭ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
THAT THE AUDITOR
NEEDS TO UNDERTAKE
AT THE BEGINNING OF AN
ENGAGEMENT?
ȋȌ͵ͲͲ
ȋȌ
ǢȋȌ
ǡ
ȋȌ
Ǥ
Ǧ
PHOTO GETTY IMAGES
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
48 IS Chartered Accountant
EXAMPLE 1 NEW ENGAGEMENT
ϐ
ϐ̵
ȋ
Ȍǣ
ȋǡ
ȌǤ
ǡ Ǣ
ϐ Ǣ
Ǣ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǣ
ϐ
Ǥ
s
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
It is important that the
auditor understands ϐ
ǡ
the intended use of
ϐ
each and every section
ǦǤ
contained within the Ǥ
ʹͳͲʹͺ
firm's standard audit
programme so that he
Ǧ
Ǥ
can properly carry out
the procedures during
the planning process.
Q2 WHAT ARE
THE COMMON
PROCEDURES THAT THE
AUDITOR CAN PERFORM AS
Ǥͳ PART OF THE PLANNING
PROCESS, PARTICULARLY
ȋȌͳ
ʹ FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-
SIZED PRACTICES, TO
ȋȌǤǡ OBTAIN AN UNDERSTANDING
OF THE COMPANY TO BE
ǡ AUDITED?
ȋȌǣ
Ǥ
i)
EXAMPLE 2
̵
RECURRING ENGAGEMENT ϐ
ϐ
Ǥǡ ̵ϐ
ǡ
ϐ
ϐ
ϐ
Ǥ
ϐ
ǡϐ Ǥ
ϐ
̵ ii)
Ǧ
Ǥ
Ǥ
OCTOBER 2013 49
TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE
AUDIT PLANNING
ǣ
ϐ
Ȁϐ
ϐ
Ǣ Ǣ
ϐ
Ȁ
ȋǡǡ
ǡǡ
ϐ
ȌǢ
ϐ
ȋǡ
ǡ
ȌǢ
̵
ϐ
ȋ
ǡ
ȌǤ
ϐ
ȌǤ
Ǥ
iii)
ǡ
Ȁ
ǡ
Ȁ
ǡ
ϐ
Ǥ Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
̵
ǡ
Q3 HOW CAN THE
AUDITOR PREPARE
A MORE EFFICIENT AND
Ǥ
Ǥ
EFFECTIVE AUDIT PLAN?
ǡ ǡ Ǧ
ϐ
ȋȌǡ
̵
PHOTO GETTY IMAGES
50 IS Chartered Accountant
Ǣ
Going concern
Ǥǡ
ȂǦǦ ͳʹǡ
ϐǦ
Ǣ
Ǥ Competency of ϔinance personnel
s
̵
ǡ
SSA 300 para 6 requires
ϐ
Ǥ
the auditor to perform
preliminary engagement
activities regarding
ϐ
(i) Engagement ǡ
acceptance and
continuance; Ǥ ǡ
(ii) Evaluation of
compliance with
ethical requirements ǡ
including independence,
Ǥ
and (iii) Establishing Ǥ
ʹͶͲʹͻǤ
an understanding ǡ
of the terms of the
engagement. ǡ
ϐ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ ǡǡ
ȋͳ
ȌǤ
̵
Ǥ
Q5 MUST REVENUE
RECOGNITION BE
ǡ
Q4 WHAT IS THE
DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN RISKS AT
INCLUDED AS A SIGNIFICANT
RISK IN ALL ENGAGEMENTS?
ʹͶͲȋȌʹǡ̶
ǦǤ
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ǡ LEVEL AND RISKS AT
ASSERTION LEVEL? ǡǡ
͵ͳͷͳͲͷ̶
ϐ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥǡ ϐ
̵
Ǥ̶
Ǥ̶
ϐ
Ȁ
Ǥ ǣ
ǡ
Management override of controls
ȋȌ
Ǥ
ϐ̵
OCTOBER 2013 51
TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE
AUDIT PLANNING
TABLE 1Assertion risk action plan extracted from C8.3 of the Audit Manual (for illustration only)
H, FINANCIAL REPORTING
SPECIFIC RISK M,
MANAGEMENT AREAS & ASSERTIONS
AUDIT OUTCOME
AFFECTING CLIENT L
RESPONSE AFFECTED
APPROACH (FINAL AUDIT)
Revenue recognition – H Management commented Sales – Occurrence > Select 20**additional Cross-referenced
presumed risk of fraud that the company has samples (based on to work
(key management's controls in place to check auditor’s judgement) for performed in the
remuneration is linked the validity of the sales. sales that occurred in respective audit
to the sales of the the last quarter of the sections.
company) WORK PERFORMED financial year.
Refer to evaluation
performed in C5.1*; noted > Review the (i) journal
that there is no proper entries passed and
segregation of duties and (ii) credit notes issued
hence substantive testing two months** after the
approach is adopted. financial year for any
reversal of revenue.
*C5.1 - Review of design & implementation of internal controls is not illustrated in this example.
**For our illustration purpose, the sample size and period of review are determined based on the auditor’s judgement specific to the circumstance set out in the question.
Ǥ
ȋϐ
ȌǤ
ͳ
ʹͶͲ
Ǥ
ǡ
s
ǡ
If the auditor concludes
that the presumed risk
of fraud on revenue
recognition is not ȋǡ
applicable in the
ȌǤISCA
circumstances
of the engagement,
PHOTO SHUTTERSTOCK
52 IS Chartered Accountant