Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
In fact, the move has laid to rest any pretence that Modi recognises the need to
be a centrist prime minister and that his pandering to his right-wing RSS
support base is only a way to keep them in good humour. Everything about his
government’s demeanour over the past couple of weeks confirms the deep
ideological conviction that underpins his actions.
Sadly, the popular rebuttal that India’s democracy is robust enough to keep
the minorities from being jettisoned isn’t going to mean much now. Most of all
because Modi, perhaps more so than any of the new populist brand of leaders
around the world, has perfected the art of tying big business interests with an
exclusionary social and political agenda. His recent electoral campaign was a
picture-perfect illustration: despite poor economic performance, he
neutralised the Congress and others by sucking virtually all big business
money into his campaign and combined this with an over-the-top national
security discourse that targeted the Indian left, Pakistan, and everyone that
stood against the Hindu-right’s vision.
Fast forward a couple of months to his Kashmir move. So aggressive was the
manner in which it was executed that even the most sympathetic world
capitals and media outlets had to speak up. But as the minorities shuddered,
Corporate India watched millions of Indians come out in Modi’s support. If
you are a strongman on a mission to redefine the social fabric of your society,
the urge would be to do more.
ARTICLE CONTINUES AFTER AD
Third, and most important, what we are witnessing isn’t about the Kashmir
issue only. Whatever one may say to critique what has happened there, you
can’t blame Modi and co for hiding where they want it all to end up. Nor have
they done so about where they’ll go next. For instance, a temple will be built
on the site of the Babri mosque regardless of the consequences. And much
more thereafter.
As this transpires, Pakistan will face an existential question about its position
on the Muslims across the border. Is standing up for them and presenting this
as a right based on our official interpretation of the two-nation theory going to
remain part of the policy ethos? Or are we prepared to consider it India’s
matter?
The issue strikes at the heart of the identity question we have been debating in
this country for as long as it’s been around. How this is handled in the current
context will have direct implications for our already polarised debate on
identity, the raison d’être of the state’s security institutions, and for how the
Indian Muslims — many of whom are directly impacted by the state of India-
Pakistan relations and Pakistan’s stance on their plight — will see Pakistan’s
role in the treatment New Delhi metes out to them. The issue will have to be
handled extremely delicately.