Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Foreign Policy
Introduction Reviewed. As stated repeatedly: The most
important actors within the global system continue to be the central
governments of sovereign states. Each central government has relationships
with other central governments and other international actors. These
relationships are summarized as that country's foreign policy. The dominant
model of the global system continues to hold the view that the world is
composed of a system of sovereign states. My WEB pages on the History of the
State System details that position. This WEB page assumes the state-centered
point of view. The sum total and the product of all foreign policies would
result in what we call the global system. While I do not agree with this state-
centered approach, it does provide important insights into global politics.
For most American students taking this course, it should not come as a surprise
to be told that the United States continues, at this moment in history, to be the
most powerful state on this planet. The conduct of American foreign policy is a
major determinant shaping the international system.
Despite the great power exercised by the United States, we are not all powerful
and we are not alone on this planet. Even United States' power is limited and
even we must operate within a global system.
The modern state system includes both major, middling, and small powers. All
states conduct their own foreign policies. One primary objective of each
county's foreign policy is to maintain its own political independence and
security.
American Foreign Policy would refer to the goals and objectives pursued by
the United States and the tools it uses to implement these goals and objectives
with regard toother countries and other international actors. Courses on
American Foreign Policy within Political Science Departments of American
Colleges and Universities would look at the world from an American
perspective. The American national government conducts our foreign policy in
defense of our national interests.
International Politics is one of the five major fields of political science. It looks
at the entire international system. The United States is just one state within that
system and American foreign policy refers to one strand of decision-making. In
other worlds, International Politics takes a broader and different perspective
than do courses on foreign policy.
If the foreign policy of a given state is under analysis, then we are trying to
explain state-level behavior. This state-level behavior can be explained in
global terms, state-level terms, and individual terms. But the unit under
investigation is at the state level.
From the point of view of a given country's foreign policy, three categories of
influence may be distinguished: 1) the global influence that shape foreign
policy; 2) the state or internal influence within the given country that impact on
foreign policy; and 3) the individuals and personalities of the decision makers
and those who have access to them and help them to shape the policy making
process.
The foreign policies of a given state depend on its power, its objectives, and its
leadership.
Power is an elusive concept but widely used in political science. Power may be
defined as the ability to persuade others to do things that they would not do
ordinarily unless pressured to do so. Within domestic politics, power is usually
based on numbers, wealth, and organizational skills. A small group that is well
organized may exercise considerable influence even without large sums of
money. In international politics, power depends on both geopolitical factors
and idiosyncratic factors.
Inequalities of State Power. The 192 or so states of the world vary greatly in
power. The may be categories into superpowers (US); major powers (EU--
Germany, France, United Kingdom; Japan, Russia, China, and India; middling
powers (Israel, Iran, Pakistan, Poland, Spain, Republic of South Africa, Brazil,
Argentina); and minor or small powers (Serbia, Denmark, Cuba).
There are also micro-states and various territories that are not self-governing or
not independent such as client states, dependencies, and colonies.
Since its origins in 1648, the global state system has been dominated by the
great powers and their foreign policies.
Objectives of Foreign Policy. The objectives of states vary greatly but all states
seek to preserve themselves, maintain their independence, and security.
Leadership. It does matter who is elected President of the United States or who
rules China. Leaders and the elites who support them help to shape the foreign
policy of countries. It is probable that a President Al Gore would not have
preemptively attacked Iraq. On the other hand the aggressive tendencies of a
leader are clearly limited by the power base available.
Idiosyncratic Factors
It is further held that ideological conflict has come to an end with the fall of
communism in 1991. President George W. Bush puts the matter as follows in
his 2002National Security Strategy of the United States: "The great struggles of
the twentieth century between liberty and totalitarianism ended with a decisive
victory for the forces of freedom --and a single sustainable model for national
success: freedom, democracy, and free enterprise. In the twenty-first century,
only nations that share a commitment to protecting basic human rights and
guaranteeing political and economic freedom will be able to unleash the
potential of their people and assure their future prosperity." (New York Times,
September 20, 2002). This alleged victory of liberal democratic values
throughout the world has been called the end of history.(Kegley and
Wittkopf, World Politics, 8th Ed (2001), p. 63.)
President Bush seems to suggest that those who disagree with "this single
sustainable model for national success" are enemies of freedom and may be
supporters of terrorism.
"The United States . . . will actively work to bring the hope of democracy,
development, free markets, and free trade to every corner of the world. The
events of September 11, 2001, taught us that weak states, like Afghanistan, can
pose as great a danger to our national interests as strong states. Poverty does
not make poor people into terrorists and murderers. Yet poverty, weak
institutions, and corruption can make weak states vulnerable to terrorist
networks and drug cartels within their borders."
"While the United States will constantly strive to enlist the support of the
international community, we will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary to
exercise our right of self-defense by acting pre-emptively against such
terrorists." (New York Times, September 20, 2002, p. A-14)
The war on terrorism can thus be seen as a world-wide crusade to make the
world safe for democracy or "this single sustainable model for national success".
http://faculty.ucc.edu/egh-damerow/gov_207_int_sys.htm