ACADEMIC OFFICE

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI – 620 015

Ph.D. PROGRESS REVIEW FORM

Part – I
(To be filled by the Research Scholar)
Section A: Details of Registration

1. Name of the Research Scholar

2. Roll Number

3. Department

4. Date of Registration
FT: Institute Fellowship / Other Fellowship/
Type of Registration
5. (strike out whichever not applicable)
Non-stipendiary/Project/QIP/Staff
PT: On-campus/External
6. Name of the Guide

7. Name of the Co-Guide (if any)

Broad Area of Research

8.
(as decided in the 1st DC meeting)

Date(s) of previous meetings of

9.
DC

Section B: Progress Review

Previous review date and

10. progress (milestone) achieved as
on that date

Previous comments/suggestions Excellent / Very Good / Good / Satisfactory / Poor

11.
from DC
Suggestions (if any):
Identification of research problem Yes No
through literature survey
Status of the first research paper Submitted Under Accepted Published
Revision
Current submitted
status of Status of the second research Submitted Under Accepted Published
Revision
12. research paper submitted
(Tick an Number of papers accepted / Accepted Published
appropriate) published in SCI/SCIE/SSCI
journals
No of Patents Filed Granted

1
 Latest Milestone achieved (Refer
to the following Table)
Plan for
13. next six
Months

Milestones Achieved

Milestone
Stages
Description Date
Successful completion of course work (CGPA >8.0)
1.
Successful completion of comprehensive examination
2.
Identification of research problem through literature
3.
survey
Acceptance of research paper(s)
4.
Presentation of first seminar talk
5.
Acceptance of research paper(s)
6.
Presentation of second seminar talk
7.
Submission of Synopsis
8.
Submission of Thesis
9.
Attach supporting documents (1 to 9 as applicable)

Section C: Scholar’s feedback

Feedback
Sl. No. Description
(Strikeout whichever not applicable)
1. Library Resources Excellent V. Good Good Satisfactory Poor

2. Laboratory Resources Excellent V. Good Good Satisfactory Poor

Opportunities for technical Excellent V. Good Good Satisfactory Poor
3.
discussions

In case any of the above is

4.
poor, give details

Details of training /
5. workshops / conferences Inside NITT Outside NITT
attended
2
 Training programmes
attended

Workshops attended

Conferences attended

In case not attended any of

6.
the above, give reasons

Name of the Research Scholar Signature Date

3
 Part – II

(To be filled by the Research Guide & Doctoral Committee)

Comments of the Guide(s)

Progress Rating Excellent / Very Good / Good / Satisfactory / Marginal / Poor

Comments on the Research Progress:
(specify any particular lacuna if progress is marginal or poor)

Observations of Doctoral Committee

Progress Rating Excellent / Very Good / Good / Satisfactory / Marginal / Poor

Comments on the Research Progress:
(specify any particular lacuna if progress is marginal or poor)

Milestones achieved so far by the Research Scholar

(Tick all applicable stages)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sl.
Name Signature
No.
1. Chairman (DC)

2. Internal Member

3. Allied Department Member

4. External / Internal Member

5. Research Guide

6. Co-Guide (if any)

4
 Part – III

(To be signed by the Research Scholar)

I have noted the comments / suggestions given by the guide and the Doctoral Committee.

Signature of the Research Scholar with Date

Forwarded by the HoD

Signature of the HoD with Date

Copy to:

1. Academic Office (PhD section)

2. Chairman, Doctoral Committee
3. HoD
4. Research Guide(s)
5. Research Scholar