Bombadar is the political center of Mritashtra.

It is an important city as well as

it connects the Arabian Sea to the rest of the country.

Mr. Bipin- been in politics for the past 15 years but his selection is uncertain
considering the wave in the entire country to end dynastic politics.

His politics was considered to be borderline regressive by some so he(in an effort

to dispel that image) projects himself as a moderate with emphasis on women's
rights
and decisional autonomy.The public now looks at him more favourably in this regard.

The public knows about his son Bunty's engagement with his fiance.(24-03-2019).
Date of election-31-03-2019

Rawcomix-1.5 million followers majorly of Mritashtra,focuses on local

events,unapologetically scathing critique of any party,Mr. Bipin himself retweeted
the tweets of
Raw when his father was contesting for cm in the last elections.

*** News from non-mainstream online sources(based on their own undisclosed credible
sources) publish unverified news on their blogs.

ABOUT IPC section 499.

Section 499 in The Indian Penal Code
499. Defamation.�Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by
signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning
any
person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such
imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases
hereinafter expected, to defame that person. Explanation 1.�It may amount to
defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm
the
reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings
of his family or other near relatives. Explanation 2.�It may amount to defamation
to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of
persons as such. Explanation 3.�An imputation in the form of an alternative or
expressed
ironically, may amount to defamation. Explanation 4.�No imputation is said to harm
a person�s reputa�tion, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the
estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or
lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or
lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of
that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as
disgrace�ful.
Illustrations
(a) A says��Z is an honest man; he never stole B�s watch�; in�tending to cause it
to be believed that Z did steal B�s watch. This is defamation, unless it fall
within
one of the exceptions.
(b) A is asked who stole B�s watch. A points to Z, intending to cause it to be
believed that Z stole B�s watch. This is defama�tion unless it fall within one of
the
exceptions.
(c) A draws a picture of Z running away with B�s watch, intending it to be believed
that Z stole B�s watch. This is defamation, unless it fall within one of the
exceptions. First Exception.�Imputation of truth which public good requires to be
made or published.�It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning
 any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or
published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of fact. Second
Exception.�Public conduct of public servants.�It is not defamation to express in a
good faith any opinion whatever re�specting the conduct of a public servant in the
discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character,so far as his
character appears in that conduct, and no further.

***** ISSUES
The official twitter account of
Mr. Bipin�s party rubbished this �rumour�, and made a scathing attack on Raw
alleging
that it had got money from the opposition�s lobbyists for running this unconfirmed
story.

Can Raw file a counter defamation case since it's not proven that Raw took money
from the other party?

* Mr.Bipin kept mum when he got to know of the tweet considering the possibility of
negative publicity?Should he have kept mum? Does it make him liable?

**Section 200 in CRPC.

**
499- fine, apply it.
500-apply it.
Doubt with sec 500/34-what the heck is this 34?

**
17-03-19
first they meet Ms Batya at the hotel,then in the evening proceed to the clinic for
a regular health check-up,
only DR.Sartaj,no paper work in the fear of the negative publicity aspect.
*Isn't it illegal on the part of the hospital to allow a checkup without paperwork?

*There's an anomaly in the description of the time by Mr. Majid(9:45) and the
guard(10:30).

*
during the wedding which was to happen soon-If there is negative publicity,there
might have been some complications as the negative publicity would have been
because of her checkup which could have sensationalised by the media as being a
pregnancy test.

*case of wrong statement recorded by the police.

*exception 1 to sec 499 ipc is not applicable here as according to it :-

First Exception.�Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or
published.�It is not defamation to impute anything which is TRUE concerning any
person,
if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published.
Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of fact.
It isn't established as truth that Mr. Bipin had indulged in the practice of
getting a virginity test done.