Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Planning as a process involves the determination of future course of action, that is why
an action, what action, how to take action, and when to take action. These “why, what,
how, and when” are related with different aspects of planning process.
Why of action reveals that action has some objectives or the end result which an
organization wants to achieve, what of action specifies the activities to be undertaken,
how and when generate various policies, programs, procedures, and other related
elements. Thus all these elements speak about futurity of action. Terry has defined
Planning as - - “ Planning is the selection and relating of facts and making and using of
assumptions regarding the future in the visualization and formalization of proposed
activities believed necessary to achieve desired result.”
Features of Planning
On the basis of the definition of planning, its following features can be identified:
1. Planning is a process rather than behaviour at a given point of time. This process
determines the future course of action.
3. Planning involves selection of suitable course of action. This means that there are
several alternatives for achieving a particular objective or set of objectives. However, all
of them are not equally feasible and suitable for the organization.
4. To Help in Coordination.
Though all managerial functions lead to coordination in the organization, real beginning
is made at the level of planning stage. Well-con-sidered overall plans unify
interdepartmental activities and consequently restrict the area of freedom in the
development of purely departmental plans. Thus, various departments work in
accordance with the overall plan, and harmony is achieved. It is true to say that
coordination is essence of management and planning is the base
5. To Help in Control
Control involves the measurement of accomplishment of events against plans and the
correction of deviations to assure the achievement of objectives as set by the plans.
Thus, control is exercised in the context of planning action as standards against which
actual results are to be compared are set up through planning. At the control stage, an
attempt is made to monitor the perfor-mance on continuous basis so that immediate
action is taken if anything goes wrong.
Good and effective managers are positive in their approach and are optimistic and yet
prepare themselves for the worst. Though one cannot foresee the future but should
learn anticipate. No one can wail till the problems develop before preparing to tackle
them. This is rather being proactive. And proaction is an essential ingredient of
planning.
Planning needs choosing the best course of action among many alternatives and
decision making. If one is left with no alternatives then there is no scope for planning
i.e. choosing. It is essentially an intellectual process requiring knowledge, experience
and intelligence.
Planning is needed to make things happen or to cope up with the changes, otherwise,
one has to simply be spectator and watch things happen.
Types of planning
We have seen that planning is essential for the success and survival of any
orgainisation. One should also understand that there exist many different types of plans.
One can plan effectively only if one understands the different types of plans and its
purposes. Plans can be classified as
a. purposes or missions,
b. objectives,
c. strategies,
3
d. policies,
e. procedures,
f. rules,
g. programs and
h. budgets.
Purpose or Mission of an organization is its basic function. Like the purpose of the
university is teaching and research, that of Courts is the interpretation of laws and their
application and so on.
Objective is the ultimate goal towards which the activities of the organisation are
directed at. Like, say we take the University for example again, teaching, research and
enlightening the students are the objectives of the university, whereas, the objective of
the Examination Department of the university is to conduct the exam in a fair and
reliable manner and declare the results in time. Though the objectives of the
departments are different they are consistent with the Purpose. One department alone
is not capable of accomplishment of the Purpose.
Strategy is, in George Steiner’s words, “the process of determining the major
objectives of an organisation and the policies and programmes that will govern the
acquisition, use and disposition of resources to achieve those objectives”. In other
words strategy is the general program of action and deployment of resources to attain
comprehensive objectives. Thus, an entrepreneur needs to decide what kind of business
he is going to do? A strategy may also be policy such as selling on cash only. Treatment
of strategy as a type of plan is justified by its usefulness in practice and importance in
guiding.
Policy – Koontz et al define it as “general statement or understanding which guide or
channel thinking in decision making”. Policy defines an area within which a decision is to
be made and ensures that the decision will consistent with and contribute to the
objective.
Rule is also a plan that prescribes a course of action and explicitly states what is to be
done under a given set of circumstances. Take note to observe the differences in rules,
procedures and policies. Whereas the policies are guide to decision making and allow
the managers to use their discretion, rules and procedures allow no such discretion.
Programme is a broad term. Terry and Franklin define it as a “comprehensive plan that
includes future use of different resources in an integrated pattern and establishes a
sequence of required actions and time schedules for each in order to achieve stated
objectives”. Thus a programme includes objectives, policies, procedures, methods,
standards and budgets. Launching of a satellite is a programme.
4
flexible budgets. Government departments prepare programme budgets in which the
agency and the departments identifies goal, develops detailed programmes to meet the
goals etc. A combination of the variable and the programme budget is the zero-base
budget. In this approach the programmes are started as though from scratch or zero
base.
Principles of Planning
One should keep in mind the following principles while planning in order make it
effective.
Take time to plan. Plan in haste and repent in leisure? No. You may save some time in
quickly developing a plan. But, in the event of things going wrong, if you have not
considered all the factors in a hurry, you are under pressure of both the time and
resources. This is sure recipe for trouble – not only for you, but also for the
organization.
Planning can be top to down or bottom to top. Generally, the top management of the
organization prepares plans. However, some times the plans are evolved from the
information coming from the lower levels. These are called bottom to top approach.
Involve and communicate with all those concerned. Such an exercise commits people
concerned with the achievement of goals. Participation in the process of planning gives
a sense of pride and binds them to the objectives.
Plans must be flexible and dynamic. Vision is the art of seeing things invisible. So too
are the plans. They should include the factors unexpected or atleast should have enough
scope for maneuvering in the event of an unforeseen change in the environment.
Evaluate and revise. Evaluate the plans at regular intervals to make sure that it is
contributing to the objectives in the expected manner.
Steps in planning
There is no fixed formula or methods for planning. It is carried out as per the need of
the organisation. However one would broadly follow the following steps in planning.
The first step is determining the goals or objectives for the entire organisation. If one
fails to set correct or meaningful goals then one cannot make effective plans. Although
goal setting is the first step in planning, the real starting point is the identification of the
opportunity or the problem itself. This is very important because the manager should
know where they are, what opportunities or problems they wish to handle and why and
what they expect to gain.
The second step is determining the planning premises. Planning premises in simpler
words is the assumptions that are made about the various elements of the environment.
It is important for all the managers involved in planning to agree on the premises.
Internal premises include sales forecasts and policies of the organisation. External
premises are those factors that are out side the orgainisation such as technological
changes, general economic conditions etc.
The third step would be to decide the planning period. While operational planning focus
on the short term, the strategic plans focus on the long term.
5
The fourth step in planning is to search for and examine alternative courses of actions.
There is rarely a need to plan for where there exist no alternatives and generally an
alternative that is not obvious proves to be the best.
The fifth step is evaluating the alternatives. After having identified the number of
alternatives and examining their strong and weak points it is logical to evaluate them
against the planning premises and objectives.
The sixth step is the real point of decision making. Here, from the many alternatives
available a one is chosen i.e. the plan is adopted.
The seventh step is to make derivative plans. The plan chosen after a through analysis
is seldom complete without derivative plans. The plan, to make it operational, is split
into departmental plans. Plans for the various operational units within the departments
have to be formulated. The plans thus developed for the various levels down the
organisation are called derivative plans.
After the decisions are made and plans are set and are rolling, in order to reach the
desired goal the plan has to be reviewed periodically. Such a review helps in taking
corrective action, if necessary, when the plan is in force.
We have now understood planning, the need for planning, different types and the steps
involved in planning. In our next lesson we shall discuss the intricacies of strategic
planning.
Steps in Planning
It is not necessary that a particular planning process is applicable for all organizations
and for all types of firms because the various factors that go into planning process may
differ from plan to plan or from one organization to another. For example, planning for a
major acting will take more serious evaluation of various elements necessary for
planning but this may not be true for a minor one. Similarly in a small organization,
planning process may not be taken in the same ways as in a large organization. Here is
given a process of planning which is applicable for a major program like opening of a
new product line or acquisition of a major plant. With minor modifications, the process is
applicable to all types of plans.
The sequences of various steps in planning are in such a way that they lead to the
translation of an idea into action by reaching to the state of establishing of sequences of
activities.
Each stage contributes to plan formulation in the following ways:
6
1. Perception of Opportunities
2. Establishing Objectives
At this stage, major organizational and unit objectives are set. Objectives specify the
results expected and indicate the end points of what is to be done, where the primary
emphasis is to be placed, and what is to be accomplished by the various types of plans.
The organizational objectives should be specified in all key result areas. Key result areas
are those, which are important for organization in achieving its objectives. These are
identified on the basis of organizational objectives. For example, for an organization,
key result areas may be profitability, sales, research and development, manufacturing,
and so on. Once organizational objectives are identified, objectives of lower units and
subunits can be identified in that context. Organizational objectives give direction to the
nature of all major plans, which, by reflecting these objectives, define the objectives of
major departments. These, in turn, control the objectives of subordinate departments,
and soon down the line. Thus, there will be hierarchy of objectives in the organization.
3. Planning Premises
4. Identification of Alternatives
Based on the organizational objectives and planning premises, various alternatives can
be identified. The concept of various alternatives suggests that a particular objective can
be achieved through various actions. For example, if an organization has set its
objective to grow further, it can be achieved in several ways like expanding in the same
field of business or product line, diversifying in other areas, joining hands with other
organizations, or taking over another organization, and so on. Within each category,
there may be several alternatives. For example, diversification itself may point but the
possibility of entering into one of the several fields. The most common problem with
alternatives is not that of finding of alternatives only but to reduce the number of
alternatives so that most promising ones may be taken for detailed analysis. Since all
alternatives cannot be considered for further analysis, it is necessary for the planner to
reduce in preliminary examination the number of alternatives, which do not meet the
minimum preliminary criteria. Preliminary criteria can be defined in several ways, such
as minimum investment required, matching with the present business of the
organization, control by the government, etc. For example, one company has defined
preliminary criteria in terms of size of investment in new project and may not consider
any project involving investment of less than Rs. 40 crore.
5. Evaluation of Alternatives
Various alternatives which are considered feasible in terms of preliminary criteria” may
be taken for detailed evaluation. At this stage, an attempt is made to evaluate how each
alternative contributes to the organisatio-nal objectives in the light of its resources and
constraints. This presents a problem because each alternative may have certain positive
points on one aspect but negative on others. For example, one alternative may be most
profitable but requires heavy investment with long gestation period; another may be
less profitable but also in-volves less risk. Moreover, there is no certainty about the
outcome of any alternative because it is related with future and future is not certain. It
is affected by a large number of factors making the evaluation work quite complex. This
is the reason why more sophisticated techniques of planning and decision-making have
been developed. Such techniques will be described in a later chapter.
6. Choice of Alternative
After the evaluation of various alternatives the fit one is selected. Sometimes evaluation
shows that more than one alternative is equally good. In such a case, a planner may
choose more than one alternative. There is another reason for choosing more than one
alternative. Alternative course of ac-tion is to be undertaken in future, which is not
constant. A course of action chosen keeping in view the various planning premises may
not be the best one if there is change in planning premises. Therefore, planner must be
8
ready with alternative, normally known as contingency plan, which can be implemented
in changed situa-tions.
7. Formulation of Supporting
Plans. After formulating the basic plan, various plans are derived so as to support the
mall1 plan. In an organization there can be various derivative plans like planning for
buying equipments, buying raw materials, recruiting and training personnel, developing
new product, etc. These derivative plans are formulated out of the main plan and,
therefore, they support it.
After formulating basic and derivative plans, the sequence of activities is determined so
that plans are put into action. Based on plans at various levels, it can be decided who
will do what and at what time. Budgets for various periods can be prepared to give plan
more concrete meaning or implementation.