Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering 895

ISSN 0974-5904, Volume 04, No 06 SPL, October 2011, pp 895-898

Finite Element Study of Graphite/Epoxy Laminates Subjected to Low-velocity


Transverse Impact

Shuchindra Silayach
Former Post Graduate Student, Department of Structural Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, Jaipur,
302017, India. E-mail: silayach.shuchindra@gmail.com
K. A. Patel
Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
E-mail: iitd.kashyap@gmail.com
Sandeep Chaudhary
Associate Professor, Department of Structural Engineering, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, Jaipur, 302017, India.
E-mail:sandeep.nitjaipur@gmail.com

ABSTRACT: Laminated fibre reinforced polymers composites are used in civil engineering applications for various
purposes. The composite laminates may be damaged due to low velocity impact and such damage may be invisible by
naked eyes. This invisible damage may lead to significant reduction in material strength and stiffness. The present study
investigates the effect of low velocity transverse impact on the graphite/epoxy laminates. Finite element software
ABAQUS is used to model the laminate and carrying out the analytical studies. The Hashin’s damage criterion is
adopted to define the properties related to the damage for the graphite epoxy material. The finite element model is
validated with the results available in the literature elsewhere and the results are found to be in good agreement. The
variation of damage with the boundary conditions and thickness of the laminate is established by numerical study carried
out using the validated model. It is found that the damage decreases with increase in thickness of laminate. Damage is
more when the edges of the square plate are simply supported as compared to the boundary condition when all edges are
fully clamped.

KEY WORDS: Fibre Reinforced Polymers; Composite Laminate; Finite Element Analysis; Internal Damage.

INTRODUCTION
A composite is a multiphase material formed from a to simulate the crushing of the plates. A user-defined
combination of two or more materials that differ in material subroutine was developed by Huang and Lee
composition or form, which are bonded together, but (2003) to enhance the damage simulation.
retaining their identities and properties (Wessel 2004).
The composition of the different materials leads to newly Zhang et al. (2006) presented a numerical model for the
formed material having better properties than the composite laminate plates to predict the damage initiation
individual materials. A lot of advances are being made in and propagation in low velocity impact tests. The damages
the use of composites and they are rapidly becoming of delamination and matrix cracks were assumed to be
popular in the construction sector. Polymer composites are confined to interfaces located between predefined
now being used in areas such as bridge repair, bridge damageable regions. A scalar damage variable was
design, mooring cables, structural strengthening and introduced and the degradation of interface stiffness was
stand-alone components. established.

The impact damage mechanism in a laminate constitutes a The effect of impact fatigue on composites was studied
very complex process (Farooq and Gregory 2009). It is a and reported by Azouaoui et al. (2007). Experimental tests
combination of matrix cracking, surface buckling, were performed under increasing impact energy and
delamination, fibre shear-out, and fibre fracture, etc., increasing number of impact conditions. It was found by
which usually all interact with each other (Farooq and Azouaoui et al. (2007) that the delamination area and
Gregory 2009). A lot of research has been carried out crater dimension in the laminate increase with the increase
recently on damage in laminated fibre reinforced in the level of incident energy and impact factor.
composites due to low velocity impact. Sun & Liou
(1989) investigated laminated composite plates under Tita et al. (2008) developed a finite element analysis
impact dynamic loading using a three-dimensional hybrid (FEA) tool using Hill’s model and material models
stress finite element method. Huang and Lee (2003) implemented by UMAT (User Material Subroutine) into
carried out experiments and also used ABAQUS to software ABAQUS, in order to simulate the failure
simulate the crushing of graphite epoxy plate. A steel mechanisms under indentation tests. Two material models
indentor was used to compress the specimens made of were implemented as UMAT subroutine into software
epoxy prepregs. The reaction force was gradually ABAQUS by Tita et al. (2008). Model I was developed to
increased and recorded until the plates thoroughly simulate only the intra ply mechanism using the shell
collapsed. The FEM software, ABAQUS, was employed elements whereas model II was developed to simulate

#020410435 Copyright © 2011 CAFET-INNOVA TECHNICAL SOCIETY. All rights reserved


896 Shuchindra Silayach, K. A. Patel, Sandeep Chaudhary

both the inter ply and intra ply mechanism using the solid Damage initiation refers to the onset of degradation at a
elements. The failure criteria for the material model I was material point. In ABAQUS, the damage initiation criteria
based on works published by Yamada and Sun (1978), for fiber reinforced composites are based on Hashin’s
Hashin (1980), Chang and Chang (1987). The failure theory (Hashin and Rotem 1973, and Hashin 1980). These
criteria for model II was based on work published by criteria consider four different damage initiation
Hashin (1980) and other models. mechanisms: (i) fiber tension; (ii) fiber compression; (iii)
matrix tension; and (iv) matrix compression. The damage
Tiberkak et al. (2008) investigated the effect of low initiation criteria for the fiber reinforced composites in
velocity impact on composite plates using a finite element ABAQUS have the following general forms:
model formulated in FORTRAN computer code. The
Mindlin’s plate theory was implemented into the FE Fiber tension (σ11 ≥ 0):
approach and a 9-node Lagrangian element was
σ  τ 
2 2
considered. Effect of stacking sequence, in-plane Fft = 11T  +α  12L  (2)
dimensions, velocity of impactor and mass of impactor x  s 
was studied extensively. The contact duration was found
to be higher for plates with smaller in-plane dimensions Fiber compression (σ11 < 0):
and the duration was found to be independent of the mass
σ 
2
of the impactor. It was also found that the crack initiation Ffc =  11C  (3)
occurs away from the contact point. x 

Recently, Farooq and Gregory (2009) have developed Matrix tension (σ 22 ≥ 0):
simulation models for damages and deflections in
σ  τ 
2 2
composites. The models have benn incorporated into Fmt =  22T  +  12L  (4)
commercially available finite element software. It was  x  s 
concluded that the impactor nose shape is an important
factor in damage resistance of composite. It has also been Matrix compression (σ 22 < 0):
concluded that the performance of the laminates could be
 σ   y  σ  τ12 
2 C 2 2
improved by properly tailoring and controlling the Fmc =  22T  +  T  −1 22 + (5)
C   L 
strength parameters for the design against failure.  2s   2s   y   s 

A number of mechanisms have been proposed in literature where, Ff = failure index for the fiber; Fm = failure index
for the failure of composites. Yamada and Sun (1978)
assumed that (i) the laminate is assumed to fail when all for the matrix; XT = tensile strength in the fiber direction;
the laminas have failed with cracks along the fiber XC = compressive strength in the fiber direction; YT =
direction and (ii) the failure strength of a lamina is taken tensile strength in the direction perpendicular to the fibers;
from a cross-ply laminate. They proposed a failure YC = compressive strength in the direction perpendicular
criterion of a lamina in a laminate by means of the to the fibers; SL = longitudinal shear strength; ST =
following expression transverse shear strength; α = coefficient that determines
2
the contribution of the shear stress to the fiber tensile
σ11  τ12 
2
initiation criterion; and σ11 ,σ 22 ,τ12 = components of the
  +  = l
2
(1)
 x   sis  effective stress tensor.

when l2 ≥1 failures occur; and if l2 <1 no failure occurs. A finite element model has been developed in the present
where, σ11 and τ12 are the longitudinal and tangential shear study for the analysis of composite laminates subjected to
low velocity impact. The model is validated with the
stresses, x is the strength of the lamina in the fibre results available in the literature. Parametric studies are
direction, and sis is the in situ shear strength of the lamina. carried out to establish the effect of thickness and
boundary conditions of plate on the damage.
Hashin and Rotem (1973) proposed two failure
mechanisms: one based on the failure of the fibre and the FINITE ELEMENT MODEL AND VALIDATION
other based on the failure of the matrix. The first is The present problem involves two parts in modeling
governed by the longitudinal stress, with reference to the namely, impactor and plate. The impactor considered for
fibre orientation, and the second is governed by the the present study is a solid rigid ball of radius 10 mm and
transversal and tangential stresses to the fibre. Hashin weight 14.175 gm. The plates are square (140 mm × 140
(1980) again proposed two failure mechanisms: one mm) laminated cross-ply and angle ply composite plates
associated with the fiber and the other associated with the having 3-layers of equal thickness. The plates are assumed
matrix, distinguishing, in both cases, between tension and to be made of graphite-epoxy AS-3501-6 material (AS is
compression. the type of graphite fibre used and 3501-6 is the epoxy
type used for matrix) having different boundary conditions
at the edges. The material properties of the composite

International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering


ISSN 0974-5904, Volume 04, No 06 SPL, October 2011, pp 895-898
Finite Element Study of Graphite/Epoxy Laminates Subjected to 897
Low-velocity Transverse Impact

lamina for the model are listed in Table 1. Plate is meshed as compared to 16.5 m/sec reported by Chun and Lam
with 4-node, quadrilateral, conventional shell element (1998). The maximum value of central transverse
(stress/displacement) with reduced integration and finite- displacement obtained from the proposed model is 1.28
strain formulation (S4R element) for analysis. The plate mm as compared to 1.40 mm reported by Chun and Lam
geometry is partitioned to include a central “target” (1998). The slight difference between numerical values
location that allows a finer mesh to be applied to the local and graphs could be devoted to the method used for
impact zone. This finer mesh is transitioned to a coarse contact formulation. Chun and Lam’s analysis (1998) was
mesh at the outer edges of the plate. Details of the mesh based on Hertzian contact method whereas surface to
used for the plate is shown in Fig. 1. The Hashin’s damage surface contact formulation is used in this model.
criteria is adopted to define the properties related to the
damage for the graphite epoxy material. 20000

Table 1 Material properties of Graphite-epoxy AS-3501-6 15000

10000
Material Property Values 5000

Velocity of Impactor (mm/s)


Young modulus at fibre direction, E1 142.73 GPa 0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Young modulus at normal to the fibre, E2 13.79 GPa -5000

Poisson’s ratio, ν12 0.3 -10000

-15000
Shear modulus, G12 4.64 GPa -20000
Chun and Lam (1998)
Present Study
Shear modulus, G13 4.64 GPa -25000
Time (Micro-second)
Shear modulus, G23 3.03 GPa
Density, ρ 1610 kg /m3 Fig. 2 Comparison of impactor velocity
Tensile strength in the fibre direction, XT
1447 MPa
Comp. strength in the fibre direction, XC 1447 MPa
Tensile strength in the direction perpendi- 1.5
51.7 MPa
cular to the fibres, YT 1

Compressive strength in the direction


Central Transverse Displacement (mm)

206 MPa 0.5


perpendicular to the fibre, YC
0
Longitudinal shear strength, SL 93 MPa 0 100 200 300 400 500
-0.5
Transverse shear strength, ST 103 MPa
Volume fraction 0.66 -1

-1.5 Chun and Lam (1998)


Present Study
-2
Time (Micro-second)

Fig. 3 Comparison of central transverse displacement


NUMERICAL STUDY
To study the effect of layer thickness and boundary
conditions, analysis is carried out for 0/90/0 plate for the
impact velocity of 22.6 m/s on different layer thickness of
the ply, the period of analysis being 500 microsecond.

The analysis is carried out for three types of boundary


conditions i.e. CCCC, CSCS and SSSS, where SSSS =
plate simply supported on all four sides; CSCS = plate
with two sides clamped and two sides simply supported;
and CCCC = plate clamped on all four sides. The damage
Fig. 1 Finite element mesh of plate pattern for the boundary conditions SSSS, CSCS and
CCCC is shown in Figs. 4-6 respectively. It is observed
The developed finite element model is validated by from the Figs. that, for the same velocity of impact and
published results of Chun and Lam (1998) for 0/90/0 boundary conditions, the damage in the laminate
composite plate with clamped boundary condition and decreases with the increase in the thickness of the plate.
velocity of impactor as 22.5m/s. It is seen that damage is maximum for SSSS condition and
least for CCCC condition, though the damage pattern is
The impactor velocity and central transverse displacement nearly identical. The identical damage pattern for different
obtained from the model are compared to that reported by bounday conditions may be owing to the similar fibre
Chun and Lam (1998). The maximum value of impactor orientation.
velocity obtained from the proposed model is 16.6 m/sec

International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering


ISSN 0974-5904, Volume 04, No 06 SPL, October 2011, pp 895-898
898 Shuchindra Silayach, K. A. Patel, Sandeep Chaudhary

CONCLUSION
A finite element model has been developed for the low
velocity impact analysis of graphite/epoxy laminates.
Parametric studies are carried out using the developed
model. Damage is found to decrease with the increase in
thickness of laminate. Damage is found to be more when
the edges of the square plate are simply supported as
compared to the case when all edges are fully clamped.
Layer thickness=.46667mm Layer thickness=1.27mm
REFERENCES
[1] ABAQUS. (2009). User's Manual Ver. 6.8-1. Hibbit,
Karlson and Sorense, Inc., Pawtucket, USA.
[2] Azouaoui, K., Ouali, N., Ouroua, Y., Mesbah, A., and
Boukharouba, T. (2007). Damage characterisation of
glass/polyester composite plates subjected to low-
energy impact fatigue. Journal of Sound and
Vibration, 308, 504-513.
Layer thickness=2.3333mm Layer thickness=4.6667mm
[3] Chang, F., and Chang, K. (1987). A progressive
Fig. 4 Failure pattern of plate under SSSS damage model for laminated composites containing
stress concentrations. J. Compos. Mater. 21, 83-85.
[4] Chun, L., and Lam, K.Y. (1998). Dynamic response of
fully clamped laminated composite plate subjected to
low velocity impact of mass. Intl J of Solids and
Structures, 35, 963-79.
[5] Farooq, U., and Gregory, J. (2009). Finite element
simulation of low velocity impact damage
morphology in quasi_isotropic composite panels
under variable shape impactors. European Journal of
Layer thickness=.46667mm Layer thickness=1.27mm Scientific Research, 25, 636-648.
[6] Hashin, Z. (1980) Failure criteria for unidirectional
fiber composites. J. Appl. Mech., 47, 329-334.
[7] Hashin, Z., and Rotem, A. (1973). A fatigue failure
criterion for fiber reinforced materials. J. Compos.
Mater., 7, 448-464.
[8] Huang, C.H., and Lee, Y.J. (2003). Experiments and
simulation of the static contact crush of composite
Layer thickness=4.6667mm laminated plates. Composite Structures, 61, 265–270.
Layer thickness=2.3333mm
[9] Sun, C.T., and Liou, W.J. (1989). Investigation of
Fig. 5 Failure pattern of plate under CSCS laminated composite plates under impact dynamic
loading using a three-dimensional hybrid stress finite
element method. Computers & Structures, 33, 879-
884.
[10] Tiberkak, R., Bachene, M., Rechak, S., and Necib, B.
(2008). Damage prediction in composite plates
subjected to low velocity impact. Composite
Structures, 83, 73–82.
[11] Tita, V., Carvalho, J., and Vandepitte, D. (2008).
Layer thickness=.46667mm Layer thickness=1.27mm Failure analysis of low velocity impact on thin
composite laminates: Experimental and numerical
approaches. Composite Structures, 83, 413-428.
[12] Wessel, J. (2004). Handbook of advanced materials
enabling new designs, John Wiley & Sons Inc.,
Hoboken, New Jersey.
[13] Yamada, S. E., and Sun, C. T. (1978). Analysis of
laminate strength and its distribution. J. Compos.
Mater., 12, 275-284.
Layer thickness=2.3333mm Layer thickness=4.6667mm [14] Zhang, Y., Zhu, P., and Lai, X. (2006). Finite
element analysis of low-velocity impact damage in
Fig. 6 Failure pattern of plate under CCCC composite laminated plates. Materials and Design,
27, 513–519.

International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering


ISSN 0974-5904, Volume 04, No 06 SPL, October 2011, pp 895-898

Вам также может понравиться