Muir Woods Academy, Inc.

A Leader In Me School
Bayombong Nueva Vizcaya Accredited by FranklinCovey Philippines
Research 1/III
First Quarter Examination
S.Y. 2018 – 2019

Presentation no.: ___ Main presenter: ______________________________ Score: ________________

Grade and Section: _____________________________________________ Date: March , 2019

Oral Presentation guidelines

Score sheet
I. General Guidelines
Directions: The following serves as general guideline patterns for the presentation.

Presenters must submit a separate copy of the final manuscript of the included chapters containing the following
key components a. Introduction (Background of the study and Review of related literatures) b.
Statement of the problem, b. Assumptions of the study c. Significance of the study and, d. Scope
and limitation of the study. on a long bond paper compiled in a folder.
Each presenter is given 15 minutes to present. This includes time for reporters to accept questions from the rest
of the class.
Reporters may incorporate relevant activities such as brainstorming and games to supplement discussion of the
assigned concept as long as it does not compromise time management.

II. Oral report content

Directions: The following serves as guideline patterns for the content of each presentation.

A. Introduction (15)
Includes the background of the study, the variables of the study, and the research gap.
Must be systematically organized but is does not necessarily follow the order of format from the manuscript.
Present the content in a direct manner.

B. Related literatures (15)

Contains relevant information and recent findings related to the study.
Must be systematically organized containing summarized relevant content for each literature with citation.
Presented literatures must not exceed to 15 related studies but must not go below 5.

C. Objectives and significance of the study (15)

Contains the statement of the problem, assumptions of the study, significance of the study, scope and limitation.
Highlight the research gap and the importance of the study.
The overview of the methodology must be cited on this part of the presentation.

III. Grading criteria

Directions: The evaluation of the presentation will be based on the following rubric.
Scoring Rubrics Rating per component
Criteria Description A B C Total
1. Content of the The report contains the key components and
discussion (5 points) are explained in detail
2. Clarity of explanation The reporter consistently provides clear and
(5 points) concise discussion of the ideas raised.
3. Preparedness (3 points) Reporters are completely prepared and has
obviously planned the discussion
4. Time management (2 Reporters are able to maximize the time
points) given to them.
Total

***Reporters to be individually evaluated by a separate peer evaluation rubric.

 Muir Woods Academy, Inc. A Leader In Me School
Bayombong Nueva Vizcaya Accredited by FranklinCovey Philippines
Research 1/III
First Quarter Examination
S.Y. 2018 – 2019

Presentation no.: ___ Main presenter: ______________________________ Score: ________________

Grade and Section: _____________________________________________ Date: March , 2019

Evaluation Paper

I. General evaluation rubric

Directions: The following serves as general evaluation rubric for each group presenters.
Criteria Description
Content of the discussion (5) The report contains the key components and are explained in detail
Clarity of explanation (5) The reporter consistently provides clear and concise discussion of the ideas
raised.
Preparedness (3) Reporters are completely prepared and has obviously planned the discussion
Time management (2) Reporters are able to maximize the time given to them.
Total

II. Class evaluation rubric

Directions: The following serves as general evaluation rubric for peer.
Criteria Presentation no.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Content of the discussion (5)
Clarity of explanation (5)
Preparedness (3)
Time management (2)
Total
Divided by 3 (round off)

III. Peer evaluation rubric

Directions: The following serves as general evaluation rubric for peer.
Criteria Description
Presentation (4) The member provided help in any way for the preparation for the oral presentation.
Report (3) The member contributed in the presentation of the paper and answering queries from panel
Paper (3) The member provided help in the finalization and complexion of the research paper

IV. Peer evaluation

Directions: The following serves as general guideline patterns for the presentation.
Group Members Rating Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 Average

*** All scores for both Class evaluation, and peer will be added to the panel evaluation score as individual final
rating.
(Breakdown: Panel evaluation 45 pts, Peer evaluation 10 pts, and Class evaluation 5 pts. Overall total 60 pts.