Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
0
ICBT BATCH 30
VIRAJ
MALLAWARACHC
HI
[MANAGING
FINANCIAL
RESOURCES AND
DECISIONS]
[PRESENTED TO MR.CHAMILA AMARATHUNGA]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
2
Statement of Originality of Submitted Work
I; VIRAJ MALLAWARACHCHI
Date: 28-06-2010
3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4
Task 01 (P3)
Make financial decisions based on financial information such as budgets and make
appropriate decisions, unit costs and make pricing decisions using relevant
information.
The Budget
A budget could be simply defined as a financial document used to project future income
and expenses. The budgeting carried out by the organizations to estimate whether the
company can continue to operate with its projected income and expenses.
5
3. Realistic data including with backup records as documentary proof
The budget of a company is often made annually, but may not be. A finished budget,
usually require considerable effort, is a plan for the short-term future, typically one year.
While traditionally the Finance department compiles the company's budget, modern
software allows hundreds or even thousands of people in various departments to list their
expected revenues and expenses in the final budget. (operations, human resources, IT etc)
If the actual figures delivered through the budgeted activities during the predicted period
of time, it suggests the management of the organization understand the business and will
drive successfully driving towards the intended direction.
6
Types of Budgets
In the scope of finance it is necessary to be familiar with the various types of budgets.
The types of budgets include master, operating (for income statement items comprised of
revenue and expenses), financial (for balance sheet items), cash, static (fixed), flexible,
capital expenditure (facilities), and program (appropriations for specific activities such as
research and development, and advertising). These budgets are briefly explained below.
The operating budget deals with the costs for merchandise or services produced. The
financial budget examines the expected assets, liabilities, and stockholders' equity of the
business. It is being mainly used to analyze company's financial wealth. The operating
budget reflects daily expenses and usually being made annually.
Cash Budget
The cash budget is made for cash planning and control. It presents expected cash inflow
and outflow for a certain period of time. The cash budget helps management keep cash
balances in reasonable relationship to its needs and aids in avoiding idle cash and
possible cash shortages. The cash budget typically consists of four major sections;
1. Receipts section - is the beginning of cash balance, cash collections from customers,
and other sources as leasing, hire purchase and interest on fixed deposits.
2. Disbursement/payment section - comprised of all cash payments made by purpose
3. Cash surplus or deficit section – indicates the difference between cash receipts and
cash payments.
4. Financing section - Provides a detailed account of borrowings and repayments
expected during a certain period of time.
7
Static or Fixed Budget
Static or fixed budget is budgeted figures at the expected capacity level. Allowances are
set forth for specific purposes with monetary limitations. It is used when a company is
relatively stable. Stability usually refers to sales. This form is budgeting does not cope
with a static budget is that it lacks the flexibility to adjust to unpredictable changes.
In industry, fixed budgets are appropriate for those departments whose workload does not
have a direct current relationship to sales, production, or some other volume determinant
related to the department's operations. The work of the departments is determined by
management decision rather than by sales volume. Mostly administrative, marketing, and
manufacturing management departments belong to this category.
8
9
10
Abstracted above are sample budgeting sheets of an organization for the financial year
2007 and 2008. The main elements of a budget sheet are:
• Total sales value
• Total income
• Total operating costs
• Total expenses
• Net income
• Opening Income
Operating income is a calculation the difference between the operating revenue and
operating expenses of a certain organization. The estimated income of the financial year
2007 is 188500 and 100400 in year 2008 indicates a 46.7% decrease while the actual
figure decrease by 53%.
Operating expenses
Operating expenses are the expenses incurred in the daily operations of the company, but
exclude extraordinary expenses. Generally operating revenue as the revenue from sources
that recur from year to year, and operating expenses as the expenses within a class that
recurs from year to year. The estimated expense of year 2007 indicates a figure of 90275
and 90640 in year 2008. It is a 0.40% increase while the actual figure decreased by
0.14%.
11
Unit cost
The cost of a given unit of a product or service could be simply identified as unit cost.
The unit cost prices one generally means the costs per piece of a property (also average
costs, there total costs/quantity) contrary to the total costs. The process of the unit cost
price depends on the manufacturing technology used by the organization.
Assumption
12
Pricing
Almost every organization in the world set prices on its goods and services. Price can be
identified in different forms under the same concept.
The pricing factor determines by buyers and sellers. Setting price for goods and services
arose with the development of large scale retailers at the end of nineteenth century. In the
current business context the technology has merged labor, machinery, investors,
entrepreneurs, buyers and sellers in way which had never happened before. Web sites
allow buyers to compare price and other benefits offered by sellers rather than just
picking a product on for sale. Thus new technology also helps sellers to collect detail
information about buyers, buying habits, buyer preferences and affordable price to tailor
them in a proper manner.
In the entire marketing mix price is the main element that generates income to a
company. When setting the price, an organization should consider facts such as;
Price is the key element used to support product’s quality and positioning because when a
firm develop its strategies, must decide where to position its product on price and quality.
13
The need of a pricing objective to an organization
• Maximize profit – organizations estimate the demand and cost associated with
alternative pricing to decide the price which could maximize profit, cast flow and
return on investments.
When selecting an appropriate pricing method organizations tend to consider six major
steps to obtain its goals,
14
6. selecting the final price
Finance and price selection
When setting the price an organization mainly consider about three criteria:
• Customer demand
• Cost
• Competitor price
First, cost set a floor to the price. Second competitor prices and the price of substitutes
provide an orienting price and thirdly an assessment of unique product features
establishes the ceiling price. Therefore when selecting a price, an organization should
include one or more of these considerations. The main price setting methods can be
identified under six categories.
1. Markup pricing
The most common pricing method is to add a standard markup to the product’s cost.
Furthermore this can be identified as an adding a markup to the unit cost in order to
achieve estimated sales revenue.
15
If the manufacturer wants to earn 20% markup on sales, the markup price is;
The manufacturer sells the product at $20 and makes a profit of $4 per unit. If the
manufacturer wants to earn 50% on their selling price, they will markup the unit at $50.
This theory is applicable up to cost markup of 100%.
Markup pricing works only if the marked-up price actually brings in the estimated level
of sales. The companies introduce a new product often mark its price high to recover their
costs as early as possible but it could be a failure if competitor prices are low.
Example: Philips tried to make substantial profit out of each videodisc players but
Japanese competitors priced low and succeeded capturing market share rapidly.
16
2. Target return pricing
The target return pricing applies when an organization determines the price that would
yield its target rate of return on investments.
Some organizations believe the buyer’s or the customer perception of value is the crucial
factor to determine price. The perceived value pricing is to determine market perception
of the offer’s value accurately.
Example; Manufacturer A setting a price of $16 per unit at the initial stage of product in
market, could give him a proper feedback on customer willingness to purchase. It helps to
decide to go ahead with the new product at that price or it could be reduce or increase.
4. Value pricing
It is a method in which the organization charges a fairly low price for a high quality
offering. This is a major trend in the computer industry, which has shifted from charging
17
top dollar for cutting-edge computers to offering basic computers at lower prices. Also
retail giant Wal-Mart and Amazon.com use the same pricing strategy.
5. Going rate pricing
The firm bases its price largely on competitor’s price. In oligopolistic industries that sell
a commodity, mainly aiming at welfare of the community such as steel, paper or fertilizer
firms usually charge the same price.
When costs are difficult to measure or competitive response is uncertain, firms feel that
the going price represents a good solution, since it seems to reflect the industry’s
collective wisdom as to the price that will yield a fair return and not jeopardize industrial
harmony.
Sealed bid pricing is a strategy which set price on expectations of how competitors will
price rather than on a rigid relationship to the firm’s own cost or demand. Sealed bid
pricing consists of two opposite pulls.
• Submitting the lowest price
• Upper than the manufacturing cost for a unit
By implementing this strategy company estimates profit and probability of winning with
each price bid. Through expanding the profit margin by probability of winning the bid on
the basis of that price, the company can calculate the expected profit for each bid. An
organization makes number of bids, is a way of achieving the maximum profit in the long
run.
18
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
19
TASK 02
Analyze and evaluate the financial performance of a business and explain the
purpose of the main financial statement.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Business organizations report information in the form of financial statements which are
issued on a periodic basis. The four main financial statements include:
• Income Statement or Profit & Loss – Revenues minus expenses for a given time
period ending at a specified date
BALANCE SHEET
20
Balance sheet one of the most vital and basic elements in providing financial reporting to
potential leaders such as banks and other financial institutions, investors and vendors who
are considering how much credit to grant the business.
This is also referred to as the “statement of retained earnings”. This document is one of
the four main financial statements that quantify the financial position of organizations
operations at a specific period in time. The statement of owner’s equity details the
changes made to the owners equity account during the accounting period as the
organization issues dividend payments and retains money for the use within the
organization for investment. To completely define the statement of owners’ equity the
firm has to settle the previous equity balance with withdrawals or dividend payments,
investments and income of the present financial year.
21
OWNER’S EQUITY FORMULA:
The owner’s equity column is also the variance on the balance sheet between asset and
liability accounts. The statement of retained earnings therefore uses information from the
income statement and provides information to the Balance sheet. This is because retained
earnings appear on the balance sheet and most commonly are influenced by income and
dividends.
This is an accounting document which indicates the amount of money generated and
utilized by the business organization over a certain period of time. Cash flow can be used
to asses the firms financial health. Cash flows are of two types:
• Cash inflows – money coming into the business from various sources. EG:
Financing, operations or investment. Personal finance can also be considered such
as donations and gifts.
• Cash outflows – money going out of the business to outside parties in the form of
expenses or investments.
The cash flow statement is vital for a business and is used by shareholders and investors.
This is because the income statement is prepared under the accrual basis of accounting.
Therefore revenues reported may not have been gathered as well as expenses reported
may not have been paid. Although the balance sheet changes could be used to determine
the facts but the cash flow statement records already has included all that information.
22
ACCOUNTING RATIOS
• Profitability ratios
23
• Helps in investment decisions - It helps in investment decisions in the case of
investors and loan decisions in the position of bankers etc.
• Comparative study required – Ratios are helpful in judging the efficiency of the
firm only when they are compared with the previous year’s records. However, this
information therefore can only provide accountants with a small peek of the past
performance and projections for future may not prove correct since several factors
such as market conditions, management policies could affect the future
operations.
• Ratios only are insufficient – Ratios are only indicators. They cannot be taken as
the final regarding favorable or adverse financial position of the firm. Other
factors also must be considered.
• Issues of price level changes – Price fluctuations can cause an affect on the
validity of ratios calculated for various time periods. In this case, ratio analysis
may not highlight the trend in solvency and profitability of the company. The
24
financial statements, therefore, be adjusted keeping in view the price level
changes in a meaningful comparison is to be made through accounting ratios.
• Lack of adequate standard – No fixed standard can be laid down for principle
ratios. Hence, there are no well conventional standards or rules of thumb for all
ratios which can be accepted as norm. It makes interpretation of the ratios tough.
• Limited use of single ratios – A single ratio does not convey a lot. To make a
better interpretation, several types of ratios must be calculated which is likely to
confuse the analyst rather than helping him/her to make any favorable effective
decisions.
• Personal bias- Ratio is the only means of financial analysis and not an end in
itself. Ratios have to be interpreted and therefore different people may analyze
and interpret the same ratio in numerous ways.
• Incomparable – Not only industries differ in their nature, but also the business
organizations in the similar industry widely differ in their size and accounting
procedures. It makes ratios difficult to compare and misleading.
25
JOHN KEELLS HOTELS PLC
In the terms of market capitalization, John Keells Holdings PLC is the largest listed
conglomerate existing in the Colombo Stock Exchange. John Keells Hotels PLC is the
largest hotelier in the island and amongst the world in Maldives. John Keells Hotels PLC
owns several popular Hotels in Sri Lanka such as: Cinnamon Grand Colombo, Cinnamon
Lakeside Colombo, Cinnamon Lodge Habarana, Chaaya Citadel Kandy, Chaaya Village
Habarana, Chaaya Blue Trincomalee, Bentota Beach Hotel, Bentota, Coral Garden,
Hikkaduwa, Yala Village.
VISION STATEMENT
“To be the hospitality market leader”
MISSION STATEMENT
“To strive for perfection when providing guest experiences that exceed expectations and
be recognized as en emerging regional leader in hospitality, through the discovery of
quality service propositions, supported by superior performance from our people and
26
technology, whilst nurturing values on responsible tourism and providing a sustainable
future for all stakeholders”.
VALUES
• Changing constantly, re-inventing and re-involving
LIQUIDITY RATIO
This type of ratios supports the firm with information regarding the businesses ability to
meet its short term goals and financial obligations. They are of particular significance to
those extending short term credit to the business.
Liquidity ratio provides the basis for answering two main questions:
• Does the business organization have enough cash and near-cash assets to pay its
expenses on time?
• How fast can the firm transform its liquid cash assets (accounts receivables and
inventory) into cash?
27
CURRENT RATIO = CURRENT ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
2010 2009
Current Ratio = 4,818,208 1,510,487
3,605,060 4,148,104
The above current ratio is a test used to identify the financial strength of a business. With
the analysis of the current ratio for M/s. John Keells Hotels Group provides us with an
understanding on how many assets are likely to be converted to money within a year in
order to clear the debts taken. John Keells Hotels Group primary sources are the firms’
current assets which are used to repay current and maturing financial debts. When
analyzing the above current ratio calculation, it is understood that both 2010 & 2009
reflects a negative picture of the firm because the norm for this ratio is 2:1. This means
that John Keells Hotel Group PLC have insufficient assets in the business. This can be
due to the firm accruing assets on credit basis. However, the firm has proven a slight
increase of 0.98 in the year 2010 in contrast to the previous mentioned year.
28
2,010 2,009
Current Ratio = 4,818,208 - 129,239 1,510,487 - 127,992
3,605, 060 4,148,104
Current Ratio = 1.30 times 0.33 times
Acid test ratio is a stringent test that shows weather the firm has sufficient short term
assets to cover its immediate liabilities without having to sell inventory. The acid test
ratio is far accurate and reliable than working capital ratio because the working capital
ratio allows for the inclusion of inventory assets.
When analyzing the acid test ratio of John Keells Hotels PLC, it is evident that in the
present year the firm does not show any visible liquidity problem because the benchmark
for the acid test ratio is 1:1. Between the years 2009 and 2010 the firm acid test ratio
highlights an increase of 0.97. However in comparison to the previous year 2009, John
Keells suffered from a liquidity problem because they were very much lower than the
acid test ratio norm. An improvement above expected could be mainly due to the firm
managing their assets properly in order to avoid future liquidity issues. This is because if
current liabilities are not paid in time it could be very damaging to the firms image as
well which could result in a long term loss for the hotels. This approach can also be
referred to as “efficiency” ratio because they provide a basis for assessing how
effectively John Keells Hotels PLC is utilizing its resources in generating sales.
29
2,010 2,009
Average Collection Period = 1,008,973 819,031
6,038,073 5,114,000
The average collection period ratio is also known as Debtors collection period ratio. This
represents the average number of days the business has to wait before its debtors are
converted into cash. The industry norm for A.C.P is 63 days. When analyzing the average
collection period of John Keells Hotels PLC we can identify that both 2009 and 2010
years are not facing any problems with collection from debtors. The year 2009 has shown
a favorable collection period than in 2010. This is because there is a 2.53 difference
between both the years which gives a perception that the present year is facing a slightly
lengthier collection period. On average, John Keells Hotels PLC collects its credit sales
every 61 days where as last year collections were made in 58 days. The reason for the
extended days for collection may be due to the company providing a longer credit period
in order to retain its customers. The firm however is not showing any collection problems
mainly because they provide discounts for early payments from their customers.
30
2010 2009
Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio = 6,038,073 5,114,000
1,008,973 819,031
Accounts receivable ratio is commonly used in place of the average collection period
ratio because it contains the same information. The industry average in this case is 5:8
times. When analyzing the above accounts receivable ratio it is evident that 5.98 times
easily translates into an average collection period of 61 days.
Working:
365/5.98 = 61 days.
Similarly the previous year amount will also be equal to the number of days calculated by
the “average collection period ratio”.
Working:
365/6.24 = 58 days.
31
INVENTORY TURNOVER = COST OF GOODS SOLD
INVENTORIES
2010 2009
Inventory Turnover = 1,832,385 1,653,083
129,239 127,992
Inventory turn over shows the effectiveness and efficiency with which a business
organization is managing its investments in stocks is reflected in the number of times its
stocks are replaced during a year. John Keells Hotels PLC inventory turnover ratio in the
year 2009 is 12.92 which is higher than the favorably higher when comparing the
industry norm of 3.6 times. Since then to the present year the inventory turnover has
shown a reasonable increase by 1.26 times. This is because since the war era had ended in
the year 2009 in the island, more tourists are encouraged to visit Sri Lanka. Last year
when things were tougher than ever, they seized every opportunity to grow their business
in anticipation of the good times ahead. The country is expecting approximately 2 million
travelers to choose our island as the holiday of choice and the increase shown is mainly
due to the emerging tourism growth taking place as time goes on.
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
32
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN = GROSS PROFIT X 100
NET SALES
2010 2009
Gross profit margin = 4,205,688 3,460,917
6,038,073 5,114,000
The Gross profit margin indicates the businesses mark up upon costs of goods sold as
well as their ability of management to reduce their costs of goods sold in relation to sales
plus the method for deciding the costs. Gross profit margin of John Keells Hotels PLC
constitutes 69.65% of sales in the year 2010. This indicates a 1.97% increase in profit
from sales in contrast to the previous year. The industry average for Gross profit margin
is 26.7%.
John Keells have performed exceptionally well in relation to the industry average. This
could be because the supplier power is less as there are several suppliers to choose from.
Since prices of supplies is less the firm can set a reasonable price which is accommodated
with a favorable profit mark up. Another factor could be because the suppliers are
providing economies of scale which in turn reduces the cost of sales. In my opinion, John
Keells can further improve their gross profit margin by backward integrating because
acquiring ownership of ones supply chain. This in turn can further reduce input costs.
Operating profit margin indicates how effective a firm is at controlling the costs
and expenses which are linked with their normal business operations. The
operating profit margin therefore serves as an overall measuring of operating
effectiveness. The operating profit margin industry average is 8.9%.
When analyzing John Keells Hotels PLC it is evident that both the years are very
low in comparison to the industry norm. In the year 2009 the operating profit
margin obtained was 4.33% but it has highlighted a reduction by 0.88%. This
means that in both the years the firm operating efficiency is very minimum
because the expenses per pound of sales are very high than the industry norm.
This could be because even though the war has ended the country is still
recovering. Therefore since there is heavy tax incurred on various
products/services the expenses tend to increase. Which intern leads to heavy costs
been incurred.
Return on investment=
Operating income return on investments reflects the rate of return on the business total
investment before interest and taxes. When analyzing the operating income return on
investment it shows a reduction of 0.34% from 2009 to 2010. The ratio norm is 12.5%
thus it clearly shows that John Keells Hotels PLC is not up to par with their operating
income return on investment. In the year 2009 the business has obtained a 1.5% return on
its total assets before interest and taxes have been paid. The following year has shown a
slight decline from previous year.
Turn over ratio is used to analyze weather the assets are being utilized to the optimum
level. According to the above figures calculated both the years indicate that the firm has
not utilized their assets well. The industry average for this ratio is 1.4 times. This means
the firm has to streamline their assets with the sales of the company. A slight reduction
of 0.01 times can be identified in the year 2010 when comparing to the previous year.
2010 2009
Non current asset turnover = 6,038,073 5,114,000
13,110,180 13,237,806
Non - current asset turnover ratio has an industry norm of 9.8 times.
36
LEVERAGE RATIOS
This helps the business to know to which extent it is utilizing borrowed money.
Business organizations that have a very high leverage may be at a risk because
they might fall into bankruptcy if they are unable to make payments for the
borrowing taken. This can also result in banks, other financial institutions from
refusing to provide the business organization with loans in the future.
Debt Ratio
2010 2009
Debt Ratio = 3,605,060 4,148,104
3,123,560 3,376,454
6,728,620 7,524,558
The gearing ratio has an industry average of 54.9%. When analyzing the above ratio, it is
evident that John Keels Hotels PLC has financed More than half of the assets were been
financed in the year 2009 with borrowed funds. However, due to the increase in revenue
by Rs.924073 Million in the year 2010 the management has been able to reduce their debt
by a vast amount which is approximately 13.49%.
37
Long term debt to total capitalization
2010 2009
Long term debt to total 3,123,560 3,376,454
capitalization=
11,199,768 7,223,735
The long term debt to total capitalization ratio indicates the degree to which the business
organization has used long term debt in its permanent financing. Total capitalization
represents the sum of all the permanent sources of financing used by the firm including
long term debt, Preference shares and Ordinary equity. The industry norm is 22.8% for
this ratio. When we analyze it shows that in the year 2009 John Keels Hotels PLC has
used almost half of its permanent financing from debt sources. However, we have seem
an improvement in the present year because the management has cleared most of its long
term debt and have brought it down to about 18.85% which is almost in par with the
industry average.
2010 2009
Net profit margin= 205,158 (220,976)
6,038,073 5,114,000
38
The industry average for net profit margin is 4.14%. The net profit margin involves the
net after tax profits of the firm as a percentage of sales. When comparing the years 2009
and 2010 it is shown that it has been a reduction on the net profit margin by 0.93%. 2009
net profit margin highlights a very favorable year because John Keels have obtained even
higher net profit when comparing to the industry average. As the present year net profit is
low investors would not be very pleased in the performance of the business. Potential
investors would also withhold from investing in John Keels Hotels PLC.
2010 2009
Return on total assets = 208,147 (221,479)
17,928,388/ 2 14,748,293/ 2
Return on equity
2010 2009
Return on equity= 205,158 (220,976)
11,199,768 7,223,735
39
Financial statements of different organizations
• Sole proprietorship
• Partnerships
• Corporate
• Non profit organizations
The main financial documents are identified as balance sheet, Profit & loss, cash flow
statement, changes in equity statement. A sample Profit & Loss sheet is given below:
40
A sample balance sheet is stated below:
41
CONCLUSION
John Keells Hotels PLC and Aitken Spence Hotels PLC are two market leaders existing
in the hospitality industry. Both these blue chip organizations are in very high
competition with each other. However based on the information accrued from the ratios
which have been extracted from the financial statements of 2009/10 it is evident that
Aitken Spence is performing some what better than its rival John Keells Hotels Group.
However there is no 100% best performance seen from either company which indicates
that there is still room for improvement. John Keells must improve by utilizing the
resources more efficiently and Aitken Spence should maintain consistency and improve
further.
42