Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
pyrig
No Co
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
lica
A systematic approach to deep caries removal te
tio
n ot
n
end points: The peripheral seal concept ss en c e fo r
in adhesive dentistry
David S. Alleman, DDS1/Pascal Magne, DMD, PhD2
The objective of this article is to present evidence-based protocols for the diagnosis and
treatment of deep caries lesions in vital teeth. These protocols combine caries-detecting
EZFXJUIBOBUPNJDBMBOEIJTUPMPHJDLOPXMFEHFUPBSSJWFBUJEFBMDBSJFTSFNPWBMFOEQPJOUT
GPSBEIFTJWFSFTUPSBUJPOT%*"(/0EFOUMBTFSGMVPSFTDFODFUFDIOPMPHZDBOBMTPCFVTFEUP
confirm these end points. These ideal caries removal end points generate a peripheral seal
[POFUIBUDBOTVQQPSUMPOHUFSNCJPNJNFUJDSFTUPSBUJPOT"SFWJFXPGUIFQVCMJTIFEMJUFSBUVSF
since 1980 on caries, caries diagnosis, and caries treatments and their relationships to
BEIFTJWFCPOEJOHUFDIOJRVFTXBTDBSSJFEPVU$PNCJOJOHBOBUPNJDBMNFBTVSFNFOUTBOE
QBUIPMPHJDBOEIJTUPMPHJDLOPXMFEHFXJUIDBSJFTEFUFDUJOHEZFBOE%*"(/0EFOUMBTFS
fluorescence technologies can produce ideal caries removal end points for adhesive
EFOUJTUSZXJUIPVUFYQPTJOHWJUBMQVMQT(Quintessence Int 2012;43:197–208)
The most common pathology clinicians treat junction (DEJ), complete removal of caries
is caries and its resulting decay.1 The treat- by the traditional visual and tactile tech-
ment of this disease involves the diagnosis nique has been successful. The minimally
and management of the patient’s biofilm invasive dental treatments for these smaller
and then the remineralization or restoration lesions using air abrasion, sonic diamond
of the damaged tooth structure.2–5 Treating tips, glass-ionomer cement, and bonded
EFDBZ XJUIPVU USFBUJOH UIF DBVTF PG EFDBZ composite resin have reduced the need for
JT B QSPCMFN UIBU UIF $".#3" $BSJFT traditional preparations that eliminate impor-
.BOBHFNFOU#Z3JTL"TTFTTNFOU
QSPHSBN tant anatomical structures.11–15 )PXFWFS
GPS
is seeking to resolve. 6,7
Small lesions can lesions of medium and large depths, more
often be treated nonsurgically, according sophisticated techniques are required for
UPUIFSFWJTFE*OUFSOBUJPOBM$BSJFT%FUFDUJPO determining ideal caries removal end points
BOE "TTFTTNFOU 4ZTUFN *$%"4 **
8 After (Fig 1).
the systemic disease is treated and incipi- Using traditional visual and tactile tech-
ent lesions are remineralized9 or infiltrat- niques for these larger lesions is often
ed,10 DMJOJDJBOT BSF MFGU UP EFUFSNJOF IPX inconsistent for determining optimal caries
much of the caries should be removed removal end points that consistently preserve
CFGPSF SFTUPSBUJPO 'PS TNBMM
TIBMMPX UPPUI TUSVDUVSF BOE SFNPWF JOGFDUJPO XJUIPVU
lesions limited to the enamel and super- exposing the pulp. Such ideal caries removal
ficial dentin closest to the dentinoenamel FOEQPJOUTXPVMEQSFTFSWFQVMQWJUBMJUZXJUI-
out limiting the strength and durability of the
BEIFTJWF SFDPOTUSVDUJPO 3FTFBSDIFST BOE
1
Codirector, Alleman-Deliperi Center for Biomimetic Dentistry, DMJOJDJBOT IBWF TUSVHHMFE XJUI UIF QSPCMFN
South Jordan, Utah, USA. PGUPPNVDIWTOPUFOPVHIXIFOJUDPNFTUP
2
Associate Professor, Don and Sybil Harrington Foundation the removal of decayed tissue.16–18
Chair of Esthetic Dentistry, Division of Primary Oral Health Care, This paper outlines a system for deter-
The Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of the University of
mining more predictable caries removal
Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
end points for deeper lesions in vital teeth.
Correspondence: Dr David S. Alleman, Alleman-Deliperi Center
5IJT BQQSPBDI JT CBTFE PO EFUBJMFE LOPXM-
for Biomimetic Dentistry, 10319 S. Beckstead Ln, South Jordan,
UT 84095. Email: allemancenter@gmail.com edge of three-dimensional dental anatomy,
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
lica
tio
te n
ot
n
ss e n c e
fo r
Fig 1 Intermediate and deep Fig 2 The concept of a periph- Fig 3 Caries removal end points for the peripheral seal
caries lesions have many visual eral seal zone is that the enamel, zone can be determined with a combination of caries-
and tactile complexities that can DEJ, and superficial dentin consti- detecting dye and DIAGNOdent technologies.
be systematically approached tute the caries-free area of a high-
with caries removal end point and ly bonded adhesive restoration.
peripheral seal zone protocols.
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
5IF GJSTU MBZFS XBT OBNFE iPVUFS DBSJPVT colored solutions (one purple, one red) 38
lica
tio
EFOUJOw *U XBT IJHIMZ JOGFDUFE
BDJEJD
BOE that stained the outer and inner carious den- t
ess c e n
ot
n
fo r
demineralized. The collagen fibrils in this tin layers differently. The outer carious den- en
MBZFS XFSF EFOBUVSFE
IBWJOH MPTU NPTU tin stained dark red, and the inner carious
of their intermolecular cross-linkages. This dentin stained lighter (pink for the red dye
MBZFSXBTOPUTFOTJUJWFUPDPOUBDUBOEDPVME GPSNVMB
5IFJOUFSQIBTFCFUXFFOUIFPVUFS
CF SFNPWFE XJUIPVU BOFTUIFTJB CFDBVTF JU BOEJOOFSDBSJPVTEFOUJOXBTSFGFSSFEUPBT
had lost the hydrodynamic system of intact the turbid layer. This interphase is a mixture
dentinal tubules. This layer also failed to PGQBSBMMFMHSPVQTPGUVCVMFT
TPNFPGXIJDI
SFNJOFSBMJ[F JO B OBUVSBM XBZ CFDBVTF UIF BSFPVUFSDBSJPVTEFOUJOBOETPNFPGXIJDI
DPMMBHFO GSBNFXPSL DPVME OPU SFUVSO UP are inner carious dentin (depending on
OPSNBM FWFO JG UIF BDJE FOWJSPONFOU XBT IPX MPOH UIF UVCVMFT IBWF CFFO JOGFDUFE
OFVUSBMJ[FE 5IF TFDPOE MBZFS XBT UFSNFE and under the influence of bacterial acids).
iJOOFS DBSJPVT EFOUJOw 5IJT MBZFS XBT QBS- Under the turbid layer, the inner carious
tially demineralized and slightly infected, dentin becomes the transparent zone. The
but the collagen fibrils retained their natural transparent zone is translucent in histologic
structure around intact dentinal tubules. FYBNJOBUJPO XJUI B MJHIU NJDSPTDPQF 5IF
#FDBVTF PG UIJT SFNBJOJOH TUSVDUVSBM JOUFH- pink staining (often referred to as a pink
SJUZ
UIF JOOFS DBSJPVT EFOUJO XBT TFOTJUJWF haze) in the turbid layer becomes lighter as
UP SFNPWBM XJUIPVU BOFTUIFTJB 5IF MVNFOT it moves into the transparent zone. In this
of the dentinal tubules in this layer had no zone, the large lumens of the dentin tubules
QFSJUVCVMBS SJOHT PG IZESPYZBQBUJUF <$B10 BSF GJMMFE UP TPNF EFHSFF XJUI 8IJUMPDLJUF
(PO4)6 0)
2]. Instead, the enlarged lumens 5IFTF MBSHF DSZTUBMT TMPX CBDUFSJBM JOWB-
XFSF OPX QBSUJBMMZ PS DPNQMFUFMZ GJMMFE XJUI sion and reduce dentin permeability. This
large crystals of tribeta calcium phosphate reduced permeability decreases the out-
<$B3 (PO4)2] called Whitlockite.35 Whitlockite XBSEGMPXPGQVMQBMGMVJE
XIJDIJTSFGFSSFEUP
is crystallized into the dentinal tubules as BTiUSBOTVEBUJPOw*UBMTPSFEVDFTUIFNPWF-
hydroxyapatite is dissolved from intertu- ment of pulpal fluid caused by temperature
bular dentin by bacterial acids. This inner changes. Underneath the transparent zone
MBZFS PG UIF DBSJFT MFTJPO XBT BCMF UP CF is an interphase of the transparent zone, as
SFTUPSFE UP B OPSNBM NJOFSBMJ[BUJPO XJUI B XFMM BT OPSNBM TFOTJUJWF EFOUJO DBMMFE UIF
hydroxyapatite matrix surrounding the col- iTVCUSBOTQBSFOU[POFw 'JH
lagen fibrils (intertubular dentin) and around The subtransparent zone stains even
UIFUVCVMFT QFSJUVCVMBSEFOUJO
XIFOUIFQ) more lightly than the transparent zone.
XBTOFVUSBMJ[FE36 3FNPWBMPGUIFUSBOTQBSFOUBOETVCUSBOTQBS-
Since the late 1960s, the goal of remov- ent zones in an attempt to reach hard dentin
ing only outer caries and saving the inner is the cause of most pulp exposure (Fig 5).
caries for remineralization has been recog- The pink-haze staining (as differentiated
nized.375IFQSPCMFNXBTUIBUFBDIPQFSB- from the red staining) of the inner carious
tor had a different sense of hard and soft. EFOUJO XBT OFWFS EJTDVTTFE CZ 'VTBZBNB
$MJOJDBMMZ GJOEJOH UIF JOUFSQIBTF CFUXFFO JO FJUIFS PG IJT UXP CPPLT PS BOZ PG IJT
the outer and inner carious dentin layers NBOZ QVCMJTIFE BSUJDMFT )F POMZ SFGFSSFE
XBT JODPOTJTUFOU "EEJOH UP UIF EJGGJDVMUZ to stained or unstained caries. As a result,
XBT UIF BOBUPNJDBM TPGUFOJOH PG EFOUJO BT many users of caries-detecting dye solu-
it nears the pulp (reparative dentin, laid UJPOT CFDBNF DPOGVTFE BCPVU FYBDUMZ IPX
EPXOEVSJOHUIFDBSJFTQSPHSFTTJPO
JTFWFO to use it. If all of the lightly stained dentin
softer than deep dentin) and the fact that XBT SFNPWFE
VOEFS UIF BTTVNQUJPO UIBU JU
different instruments (hand, rotary, or ultra- contained a significant number of bacteria,
sonic) removed more or less of the lesion then an increased number of pulp expo-
during excavation. All of this subjectivity sures occurred.39–41 Other researchers in
and variability made for inconsistent car- +BQBOXIPIFMQFEXJUI'VTBZBNBTPSJHJOBM
ies removal end points. Fusayama made research came to the conclusion that the
QSPHSFTT UPXBSE B TPMVUJPO UP UIJT QSPC- MJHIUMZTUBJOFEBSFBTXFSFNPTUMZVOJOGFDUFE
MFNCZGJOEJOHUXPQSPQZMFOFHMZDPMoCBTFE XJUI JOUBDU DPMMBHFO GJCSJMT TVSSPVOEFE CZ
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
lica
tio
te not
n
ss e n c e
fo r
Fig 4 The deep caries lesion has two parts: outer and inner cari- Fig 5 By using only visual and tactile methods
ous dentin. The inner carious dentin has three parts: the turbid for deep caries removal, the pulp is often exposed
layer, transparent zone, subtransparent zone, and normal dentin. because the tansparent zone, the subtransparent
zone, normal deep dentin, and reparative dentin are
all softer than superficial and intermediate dentin.
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
Fig 6 DIAGNOdent reads bacterial products called
lica
tio
porphyrins and is used to assess the relative amount te otn
n
of bacteria present in a caries lesion. ss e n c e
fo r
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
lica
tio
te n
ot
n
ss e n c e
fo r
Fig 7 Deep caries lesion showing the outer carious Fig 8 Caries removal end points for a deep lesion.
dentin staining red and extending to the circum- The peripheral seal zone has been created without
pulpal dentin ( > 5 mm from the occlusal surface). exposing the pulp. A small amount of outer carious
dentin is left on top of the inner carious dentin inside
the peripheral seal zone.
$BSJTPMW DIFNPNFDIBOJDBM UFDIOJRVF PG UP SFEVDUJPO JO CPOE TUSFOHUI XJMM
caries removal leaves a thin layer of residu- be observed after (approximately in the first
al outer carious dentin that may reduce the 12 months) restoration placement. A 0.2% to
NJDSPUFOTJMFCPOETUSFOHUI N5#4
68,69 This DIMPSIFYJEJOF TPMVUJPO XJMM EFBDUJWBUF
technique can be clinically successful in the matrix metalloproteinases and preserve
TIBMMPXSFTUPSBUJPOTCVUJTOPUJEFBMJOMBSHFS the maximum bond strength.75–77 Mild self-
load-bearing situations. 16,70 etching dentinal bonding systems produce an
4JNQMJGJFE UXPTUFQ UPUBMFUDI EFOUJOBM acid/base resistant zone of a 1 to 1.5 micron
CPOEJOHTZTUFNTMPTFUPPGN5#4 UIJDLOFTT SFGFSSFE UP BT iTVQFS EFOUJOw
XIFO CPOEFE UP JOOFS DBSJPVT EFOUJO71 The CFDBVTF PG JUT BCJMJUZ UP XJUITUBOE IJHI BOE
TBNFEFDSFBTFJOCPOETUSFOHUIXJMMPDDVSJG MPX Q) BUUBDLT 4& 1SPUFDU ,VSBSBZ
XJUI
acid etching is performed on dentin that is to the unique proprietary methacryloyloxydo-
CFCPOEFEXJUIBNJMEUXPTUFQTFMGFUDIJOH decylpyridinium bromide monomer contain-
dentinal bonding system.72,73 Dual-cure den- ing pyridinium bromide produces this super
tinal bonding systems can have the same dentin and also deactivates matrix metal-
negative effect.74 The acid from caries lesions loproteinases. Other mild self-etching dential
also activates endogenous collagenase bonding systems also produce the acid/base
enzymes called matrix metalloproteinases. In resisitant zones but need additional matrix
the presence of matrix metalloproteinases, a metalloproteinase-deactivating chemicals
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
TVDIBTDIMPSIFYJEJOF $POTFQTJT
6MUSBEFOU
UJPOT IBWF BMTP CFFO TIPXO UP SFEVDF UIF
lica
tio
PS CFO[BMLPOJVN DIMPSJEF .JDSP1SJNF #
effects of polymerization stress and cervical t
ess c e n
ot
n
fo r
%BOWJMMFPS&UDI
#JTDP
78–80 microleakage. 92,93
If c-factor stresses are not en
The anatomical location of the peripher- reduced, the bond strength is decreased by
al seal zone dentin must also be considered 30% to 50% during the first 24 hours and
UPQSFEJDUQPUFOUJBMCPOETUSFOHUI$FSWJDBM by another 10% during functional loading
root dentin loses approximately 20% of its in the first years of service.94$BSFGVMPQFSB-
CPOEBCJMJUZ DPNQBSFE XJUI DPSPOBM TVQFS- UPST XIP UBLF BMM PG UIFTF DPOTJEFSBUJPOT
ficial dentin. If the cervical root dentin has into account during caries excavation and
inner carious dentin present, the bond bonding procedures can decrease the array
strength is only 50% of sound coronal den- of differences in regional bond strengths in
tin.81 Deep dentin vs superficial dentin bond their restorations.95
strengths are also dependant on the type of
dentinal bonding system used. Three-step
UPUBMFUDI BOE UXPTUFQ NJME TFMGFUDIJOH
EFOUJOBMCPOEJOHTZTUFNTCPOEFRVBMMZXFMM TREATMENT GOALS
UPEFFQEFOUJO
CVUTJNQMJGJFEUXPTUFQUPUBM FOR DEEP CARIES LESIONS
etch and one-step highly acidic self-etching
systems can lose up to 50% of their bond 1. $SFBUFBQFSJQIFSBMTFBM[POFPGFOBNFM
strength in deep dentin.73,82 DEJ, and normal superficial dentin near
During placement of the restorative the DEJ (this should bond at 55 MPa)
material, the ratio of bonded to unbonded (Figs 10 and 11).
surface areas of each layer or increment of 2. Leave the inner carious dentin inside
composite (the configuration factor or c-fac- of the peripheral seal zone (this should
tor)83 XJMM BGGFDU UIF TUSFTT PG QPMZNFSJ[BUJPO bond at 30 MPa) (compare Figs 2 and 3
shrinkage that is applied to the maturing XJUI'JHTBOE
CPOE UP EFOUJO )JHIFS DGBDUPST BMXBZT 3. 3FNPWF IJHIMZ JOGFDUFE PVUFS DBSJPVT
JODSFBTFTUSFTTPOUIFCPOEUPEFOUJO
XIJDI dentin inside of the peripheral seal zone
EFDSFBTFTJUTN5#484 VOMFTTJUJTBGMPXBCMF XJUIPVU FYQPTJOH UIF QVMQ 4NBMM BSFBT
DPNQPTJUF XJUI B MPX NPEVMVT PG FMBTUJD- of circumpulpal outer carious dentin are
ity compared to dentin85). Therefore, high left to prevent exposure (see Figs 7 to 9).
DGBDUPSMBZFSJOHXJUIIJHINPEVMVTDPNQPT- 4. Seal in and deactivate any remaining
ites (thicker than 0.5 mm) should be avoided bacteria left inside the peripheral seal
XIJMF UIF CPOE UP EFOUJO JT NBUVSJOH 5IJT zone.
can best be accomplished by using an indi- 5. Use adhesive restorative techniques
rect or semidirect restorative technique.86 If UIBU XJMM NBYJNJ[F UIF CPOE TUSFOHUI
direct restoration is necessary for socioeco- of the peripheral seal zone and the
nomic reasons, compensatory measures inner carious affected dentin inside the
are required to prevent excessive stresses peripheral seal zone.
to the bond and remaining hard tissue. This
can best be accomplished by multiple thin
IPSJ[POUBM MBZFST XIJDI UBLF NPSF UJNF UP
BQQMZ
PO B UIJO MBZFS PG GMPXBCMF DPNQPT- STEP-BY-STEP
ite.20,87 " UIJO NJDSPO
NJDSPGJMMFE GMPX- TECHNIQUE
able composite or a thick dentinal bonding
system adhesive layer (50 to 80 microns) 1. 5FTU GPS QVMQBM WJUBMJUZ XJUI JDF PS BFSP-
can secure the dentin bond and create a TPM SFGSJHFSBOU &OEP*DF $PMUÒOF
GBJMTBGFMBZFS4VDIBSFTJODPBUJOHXJMMTUBZ Whaledent). If the test is positive,
CPOEFE FWFO XIFO PWFSMBZJOH MBZFST GBJM QSPDFFE XJUI DBSJFT EJBHOPTJT BOE
under high stress.88,89*OTIBMMPXQSFQBSBUJPOT treatment. If the test is ambiguous or
in superficial dentin, the detrimental effect of negative, inform the patient of the pos-
resin shrinkage is not as great because the sible need for endodontic treatment.
c-factor is reduced.90,91 Polyethylene fiber 2. Anesthetize the tooth. Isolate it using rub-
nets used to line high c-factor prepara- ber dam or other isolation techniques.
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
lica
tio
te n
ot
n
ss e n c e
fo r
Fig 10 Ideal caries removal end points and peripheral seal zone devel- Fig 11 The peripheral seal zone is free of outer and
oped in an intermediate-depth lesion using combined technologies. inner carious dentin. Inside the peripheral seal zone,
the lightly stained inner carious dentin is retained
and will remineralize in vital teeth.
3. Access the lesion after removal of any intermediate (middle third), or deep
failed restorations. Stain the caries (pulpal third) dentin (see Fig 4).
MFTJPO XJUI SFE DBSJFTEFUFDUJOH EZF 7. After removing the red and leaving the
Wait 10 seconds and rinse (see Fig 12). QJOL CFUXFFO UIF QVMQ IPSOT
UIF QJOL
4. Starting near the DEJ, use a 1-mm round inner carious dentin areas in these
diamond bur of fine to medium grit (30 intermediate dentin areas can be evalu-
to 100 microns) to create a peripheral BUFE XJUI %*"(/0EFOU 5IF OVNCFST
seal zone area free of red-stained outer should read approximately 24 (accept-
caries and pink-stained inner caries. able range, 12 to 36). Those readings
5IJT TVQFSGJDJBM OPSNBM EFOUJO XJMM CF indicate a virtually bacteria-free area in
UPNNXJEFEFQFOEJOHPOXIFUIFS the intermediate to deep dentin inside
it is on the buccal or the occlusal areas the peripheral seal zone (see Figs 10
of a molar (1.5 to 2 mm) or on the mesial and 11).
or distal root dentin (1 mm). Premolars 8. Move to the deep pulp horn areas last.
are smaller, and the superficial dentin is $BSFGVMMZSFNPWFSFETUBJOFEPVUFSDBSJ-
OBSSPXFSJOBMMBSFBT 'JHTBOE
ous dentin until deep dentin is reached
5. Staining and removing outer and inner (5 mm from occlusal surface). If the
carious dentin is repeated until the tissue continues to stain red and mea-
caries removal end point in the periph- TVSFNFOUT XJUI UIF QFSJPEPOUBM QSPCF
eral seal zone is stain free. This can be indicate that you are deeper than 5 mm
DPOGJSNFECZ%*"(/0EFOUSFBEJOHTPG from the occlusal surface (> 3 mm from
approximately 12 (see Fig 3) and the the DEJ), stop excavation to avoid pulp
total absence of caries-detecting dye. exposure (compare Figs 4 to 9).
(This indicates virtually bacteria-free 9. Optional step: Treat the peripheral seal
superficial dentin.) zone, inner carious dentin, and outer
6. 3FNPWF UIF SFETUBJOFE PVUFS DBSJPVT DBSJPVT EFOUJO XJUI UP DIMPS
dentin from the area inside the periph- hexidine for 30 seconds to inactivate both
eral seal zone (being careful to avoid the matrix matalloproteinases and any
the pulp horn areas). Measure from remaining bacteria; 0.1% to 1.5% benzal-
the occlusal surface to determine if the konium chloride solution in the acid-etch
excavation is in superficial (outer third), or methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
lica
tio
te n
ot
n
ss e n c e
fo r
Fig 12 Application of caries-detecting dyes guides Fig 13 Magnification of 6.5× to 8.0× is ideal for
the creation of the peripheral seal zone using implementing minimally invasive caries removal.
DIAGNOdent and 3D measurements to make end
point decisions in the intermediate and deep dentin
areas.
bromide monomer in the dentinal bond- The intermediate and deeper areas of light
JOHTZTUFNXJMMBMTPBDIJFWFUIFTFHPBMT80 QJOLoTUBJOFE JOOFS DBSJPVT EFOUJO XJMM MJLFMZ
If using a three-step total-etch dentinal generate a dentin bond of 30 MPa. If any
bonding system, this step is performed outer caries is left in deep circumpulpal
after acid etching and rinsing. If using areas to prevent pulp from being exposed,
B UXPTUFQ TFMGFUDIJOH EFOUJOBM CPOEJOH UIF N5#4 JO UIPTF TNBMM BSFBT XJMM CF
system, after applying chlorhexidine or approximately 15 MPa. To maximize all of
benzalkonium chloride, dry the prepara- these bond strengths, the dentinal bonding
tion for 10 seconds before applying the TZTUFNDBOCFBMMPXFEUPNBUVSFGPSBDFS-
self-etching primer.96 tain length of time (3 minutes to 24 hours)
10. 0QUJPOBM TUFQ JG VTJOH B NJME UXPTUFQ before being bonded to another layer of
self-etching dentinal bonding system: polymerizing resin cement or composite
Use air abrasion on the preparation to resin.98,99 5IJT JT XIZ JU JT JNQPSUBOU UP VTF
NBYJNJ[FUIFN5#497 the immediate dentin sealing technique
11. 4UBSU EFOUJO CPOEJOH XJUI B UISFFTUFQ XIFOFWFSQPTTJCMF86,89,100,101
UPUBMFUDI PS B NJME UXPTUFQ TFMGFUDI-
ing dentinal bonding system.
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
REFERENCES 19. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Gokalp S. The in vitro perfor-
lica
tio
mance of laser fluorescence and caries-detector dye
te not
n
for detecting residual carious dentin during tooth ss e c e
fo r
1. Fusayama T. A Simple Pain-Free Adhesive n
Restorative System by Minimal Reduction and Total preparation. Quintessence Int 2005;36:417–422.
Etching. Tokyo: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, 1993;1–2. 20. Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Effect of
2. Axelsson P. An Introduction to Risk Prediction and cavity configuration and aging on the bonding
Preventive Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1999. effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater
2005;21:110–124.
3. Axelsson P. Diagnosis and Risk Prediction of Dental
Caries. Chicago: Quintessence, 2000. 21. Yoshiyama M, Urayama A, Kimochi T, Matsuo T,
Pashley D. Comparison of conventional vs self-
4. Axelsson P. Preventive Materials, Methods and
etching adhesive bonds to caries-affected dentin.
Programs. Chicago: Quintessence, 2004.
Oper Dent 2000;25:163–169.
5. Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds). Dental Caries: The Disease
22. Boston DW, Sauble JE. Evaluation of laser fluores-
and its Clinical Management. Oxford, Blackwell
cence for differentiating caries dye-stainable versus
Munksgaard, 2003:275–292.
caries dye-unstainable dentin in carious lesions. Am
6. Featherstone JD. The caries balance: The basis for
J Dent 2005;18:351–354.
caries management by risk assessment. Oral Health
23. Krause F, Braun A, Eberhard J, Jepsen S. Laser
Prev Dent 2004;2(suppl):259–264.
fluorescence measurements compared to electrical
7. Young DA, Featherstone JD, Roth JR. Curing the
resistance of residual dentin in excavated carvities
silent epidemic: Caries management in the 21st cen-
in vivo. Caries Res 2007;41:135–140.
tury and beyond. J Calif Dent Assoc 2007;35:681–685.
24. Iwami Y, Shimizu A, Narimatsu M, Hayashi M,
8. Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Ricketts DJ, Qvist V.
Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Relationship between bacterial
Detection and activity assessment of primary coro-
infection and evaluation using a laser fluorescence
nal caries lesions: A methodologic study. Oper Dent
device, DIAGNOdent. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:419–423.
2007;32:225–235.
25. Nakajima M, Ogata M, Okuda M, Tagami J, Snao H,
9. Jenson L, Budenz AW, Featherstone JD, Ramos-
Pashley DH. Bonding to caries-affected dentin using
Gomez FJ, Spolsky VW, Young DA. Clinical protocols
self-etching primers. Am J Dent 1999;12:309–314.
for caries management by risk assessment. J Calif
26. Lucci A, Francescut P, Achermann F, Reich E, Hotz P,
Dent Assoc 2007;35:714–723.
Megert B. The use of the DIAGNOdent during cavity
10. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infil-
preparation. Caries Res 2000;34:327–328.
tration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res 2007;86:
27. Yonemoto K, Eguro T, Maeda T, Tanaka H. Application
662–666.
of DIAGNOdent as a guide for removing carious
11. Milicich G, Rainey JT. Stress distribution in teeth
dentin with Er:YAG laser. J Dent 2006;34:269–276
and the significance in operative dentistry. Pract
28. Magne P, Belser U. Bonded Porcelain Restorations
Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:695–700.
in the Anterior Dentition—A Biomimetic Approach.
12. Magne P, Oganesyan T. CT scan–based finite ele-
Chicago: Quintessence, 2002:23–55.
mental analysis of premolar cuspal deflection fol-
29. Magne P. Composite resins and bonded porcelain:
lowing operative procedures. Int J Periodontics
The postamalgam era? J Calif Dent Assoc 2006;34:
Restorative Dent 2009;29:361–369.
135–147.
13. Splieth CH, Ekstrand KR, Alkilzy M, et al. Sealants
30. Magne P. Esthetic and Biomimetic Restorative
in dentistry: Outcomes of the ORCA Saturday
Dentistry: Manual for Posterior Esthetic Restorations.
Afternoon Symposium 2007. Caries Res 2010;44:3–13.
Los Angeles: USC School of Dentistry, 2006.
14. Neuhas KW, Ciucchi P, Donnet M, Lussi A. Removal
31. Deliperi S, Bardwell D. An alternative method to
of enamel caries with an air abrasion powder. Oper
reduce polymerization shrinkage stress in direct pos-
Dent 2010;35:538–546.
terior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;
15. Schroeder H. Oral Structural Biology. New York:
133:1386–1398.
Thieme Medical Publishers, 1991:60–72.
32. Deliperi S, Alleman D. Stress-reducing protocol for
16. Neves AA, Coutinho E, Cardoso V, Lambrechts P,
direct composite restorations in minimally inva-
Van Meerbeek B. Current concepts and techniques
sive cavity preparations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent
for caries excavation and adhesion to residual den-
2009;21:e1–e6.
tin. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:7–22.
33. Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BAC,
17. Neves AA, Coutinho E, Cardoso M, de Munck J,
Huysmans MCDNJM. 12-year survival of composite vs
VanMeerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength and
amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 2010;89:1063–1067.
interfacial characterization of an adhesive bonded
34. Fusayama T. New Concepts in Operative Dentistry:
to dentin prepared by contemporary caries-excava-
Differentiating Two Layers of Carious Dentin and Using
tion techniques. Dent Mater 2011;552–562.
an Adhesive Resin. Chicago: Quintessence, 1980:13–59.
18. Neves AA, Coutinho E,de Munck J, Lambrechts
35. Ogawa K, Yamashita Y, Ichijo T, Fusayama T. The
P, VanMeerbeek B. Does DIAGNOdent provide a
ultrastructure and hardness of the transparent layer
reliable caries removal end point? J Dent 2011;39:
of human carious dentin. J Dent Res 1983;62:7–10.
351–360.
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
36. Akimoto N, Yokoyama G, Ohmori K, Suzuki S, Kohno 54. Cortes D, Ellwood R, Ekstrand K. An in vitro com-
lica
tio
A, Cox C. Remineralization across the resin-dentin parison of a combined FOTI/visual examination of
t ot n
n
interface: In vivo evaluation with nanoindentation occlusal caries with other caries diagnostic meth- e ss e n c e
fo r
measurements, EDS, and SEM. Quintessence Int ods and the effect of stain on their diagnostic per-
2001;32:561–570. formance. Caries Res 2003;37:8–16.
37. Massler M. Changing concepts in the treatment of 55. Itoh K, Kusunoki M, Oikawa M, Tani C, Hisamitsu H.
carious lesions. Br Dent J 1967;123:547–548. In vitro comparison of three caries dyes. Am J Dent
38. Fusayama T. Clinical guide for removing caries 2009;22:195–199.
using a caries-detecting solution. Quintessence Int 56. Boston DW, Jefferies SR, Gaughan JP. The relative
1988;19:397–401. location of the dye staining endpoint indicated
39. Anderson MH, Charbeneau GT. A comparison of with polypropylene glycol-based caries dye versus
digital and optical criteria for detecting carious conventional propylene glycol-based caries dye.
dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:643–646. Eur J Dent 2008;2:29–36.
40. McComb D. Caries-detector dyes—How accurate and 57. Lennon AM, Attin T, Buchalla W. Quantitiy of
useful are they? J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66:195–198. remaining bacteria and cavity size after excavation
with fluoresence aided caries excavation (FACE),
41. Banerjee A, Kidd EAM, Watson TF. In vitro validation
caries detector dye and conventional excavation in
of carious dentin removed using different excava-
vitro. Oper Dent 2007;32:236–241.
tion criteria. Am J Dent 2003;16:228–230.
58. Thompson V, Craig R, Curro FA, Green WS, Ship
42. Fukushima M. Adhesive resin penetration into cari-
JA. Treatment of deep carious lesions by complete
ous dentin [in Japanese]. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi
excavation or partial removal: A critical review. J Am
1981;48:362–385.
Dent Assoc 2008;139:705–712.
43. Sano H. Relationship between caries detector stain-
59. Gruythuysen R, van Strijp G, Wu M. Long-term sur-
ing and structural characteristics of carious dentin [in
vival of indirect pulp treatment performed in prima-
Japanese]. Kukubyo Gakkai Zasshi 1987;54:241–270.
ry and permanent teeth with clinically diagnosed
44. Iwami Y, Shimizu, Narimatsu M, Kinomoto Y, Ebisu
deep carious lesions. J Endod 2010;36:1490–1493.
S. The relationship between the color of carious
60. Casagrande L, Bento LW, Dalpian DM, Garcia-Godoy
dentin stained with a caries detector dye and bacte-
F, de Araujo FB. Indirect pulp treatment in primary
rial infection. Oper Dent 2005;30:83–89.
teeth: 4-year results. Am J Dent 2010;23:34–38.
45. Wei S, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effect of caries-
61. Zollner A, Gaengler P. Pulp reactions to different
affected dentin hardness on the shear bond strength
preparation techniques on teeth exhibiting peri-
of current adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:431–440.
odontal disease. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:93–102.
46. Boston DW, Graver HT. Histobacteriological analysis
62. Hevinga MA, Opdam NJ, Frencken JE, Truin GJ,
of acid red dye-stainable dentin found beneath
Huysmans MC. Does incomplete caries removal
intact amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1994;19:
reduce strength of restored teeth? J Dent Res 2010;
65–69.
89:1270–1275.
47. Lussi A, Hibst R, Paulus R. DIAGNOdent: An opti-
63. Urabe I, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Physical
cal method for caries detection. J Dent Res 2004;
properties of the dentin-enamel junction region.
83(spec no c):c80–c83.
Am J Dent 2000;13:129–135.
48. Buchalla W, Attin T, Niedmann Y, Niedman PD,
64. De Munck J. An In Vitro and In Vivo Study of
Lennon AM. Porphyrins are the cause of red fluo-
the Durability of Biomaterial-Tooth Bonds [thesis].
rescence of carious dentine: Verified by gradient
Belgium: Catholic Universtiy of Leuven, 2004;74–76.
reversed-phase HPLC. Caries Res 2008;42:223.
65. Yoshiyama M, Tay F, Torri Y, et al. Resin adhesion to
49. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts NB, Longbottom C,
carious dentin. Am J Dent 2003;16:47–52.
Reich E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser
fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries 66. Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J, et al. Bonding of self-
in vitro. Caries Res 1999;33:261–266. etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin.
J Dent Res 2002;81:556–560.
50. Lussi A, Megert B, Longbottom C, Reich E,
Francescut P. Clinical performance of a laser fluores- 67. Pugach MK, Strother J, Darling CL, et al. Dentin car-
cence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. ies zones: Mineral, structure, and properties. J Dent
Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:14–19. Res 2009;88:71–76.
51. Reich E, Berakdar M, Netuschil L, Pitts N, Lussi A. 68. Albrektsson TO, Bratthall D, Glantz PJ, Lindhe JT
Clinical caries diagnosis compared to DIAGNOdent (eds). Tissue Preservation in Caries Treatment.
evaluations. Caries Res 1999;33:299. London: Quintessence, 2001:263–274.
52. Brannstrom M. Dentin and Pulp in Restorative 69. Yazici A, Atilla P, Ozgunaltay G, Muftuoglu S. In vitro
Dentistry. London: Wolfe Medical, 1982:93. comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conven-
tional rotary instruments in caries removal. J Oral
53. Boston DW, Liao J. Staining of non-carious human
Rehab 2003;30:1177–1182.
coronal dentin by caries dyes. Oper Dent 2004;29:
280–286.
ht
t fo
rP
by N
ub
Q ui
70. Oikawa M, Kusunoki M, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H. Removal 87. Nikolaenko SA, Lohybauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschlt
lica
tio
of caries dentin by CarisolvTM system [abstract A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R. Influence of c-fac-
t not
n
3185]. IADR 2009.
e
tor and layering technique on micro tensile bond ss c e
fo r
strength to dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:579–585.
en
71. Zanchi CH, Lund RG, Perrone LR, et al. Microtensile
bond strength of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive 88. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PNR, Nikaido T, Tagami J.
systems on sound and artificial caries-affected den- Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin
tin. Am J Dent 2010; 23:152–156. cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:
72. Yazici AR, Akca T, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Bonding 105–113.
strength of a self-etching adhesive system to caries- 89. Magne P, So W, Cascione D. Immediate dentin
affected dentin. Oper Dent 2004;29:176–181. sealing supports delayed restoration placement.
73. Proenca JP, Polido M, Osorio E, et al. Dentin bond J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:166–174.
strength of self-etch and total-etch adhesive sys- 90. He Z, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Ikeda M, Tagami J. The
tems. Dent Mater 2007;23:1542–1548. effects of cavity size and filling method on the bond-
74. Say EC, Nakajima M, Senawongse P, Soyman M, ing to Class I cavities. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:447–453.
Ozer F, Tagami J. Bonding to sound vs caries-affect- 91. Schmidlin PR, Huber T, Gohring TN, Attin T, Bindl A.
ed dentin using photo-and dual-cure adhesives. Effects of total and selective bonding on marginal
Oper Dent 2005;30:90–98. adaptation and microleakage of Class I resin compos-
75. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, et al. Collagen degrada- ite restorations in vivo. Oper Dent 2008;33:629–635.
tion by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent 92. Belli S, Donmez N, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of
Res 2004;83:216–221. c-factor and flowable resin or fiber use at the
76. Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjaderhane L, Tay FR. interface on microtensile bond strength to dentin.
Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of J Adhes Dent 2006;8:247–253.
dentin hybrid layers in vivo. J Dent Res 2005;84: 93. El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Eltanty A, Abbasi K,
741–746 [erratum 2006;85:34]. Habib N. Gingival microleakage of Class II resin
77. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Nato F, et al. Chlohexidine composite restoration with fiber inserts. Oper Dent
stabilizes the adhesive interface: A 2-year in vitro 2007;32:298–305.
study. Dent Mater 2010;26:320–325. 94. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann K-H, Chen H, et al. Evaluation
78. Nikaido T, Weerasinghe D, Waidyasekera K, Inoue G, of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond
Foxton R, Tagami J. Assessment of the nanostruc- strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin.
ture of acid-base resistant zone by the application Dent Mater 2002;18:269–275.
of all-in-one adhesive systems: Super dentin forma- 95. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM,
tion. Bio-Med Mater Eng 2009;19:163–171. Pashley EL, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of
79. Donmez N, Belli S, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Ultrastructural resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 1999;
correlates of in vivo/in vitro bond degradation in 78:699–705.
self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005;84:355–359. 96. Toledano M, Osorio R, Moreira MAG, et al. Effect of
80. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Murat Mutluay M, Gu L, et al. the hydration status of the smear layer on the wet-
The anti-MMP activity of benzalkonium chloride. tability and bond strength of a self-etching primer
J Dent 2011;38:57–64. to dentin. Am J Dent 2004;17:310–314.
81. Doi J, Itota T, Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Pashley DH. 97. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt
Bonding to root caries by a self-etching adhesive K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an
system containing MDPB. Am J Dent 2004;17:89–93. etch and rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel
and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper
82. Nakajima M, Sano H, Zheng L, Tagami J, Pashley DH.
Dent 2003;28:647–660.
Effect of moist vs dry bonding to normal vs caries-
affected dentin with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose 98. Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, Davidson C.
Plus. J Dent Res 1999;78:1298–1303. Marginal and internal adaptation of Class II restora-
tions after immediate or delayed composite place-
83. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in
ment. J Dent 2002;30:259–269.
composite resin in relation to configuration of the
restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636–1639. 99. Asaka Y, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Tsubota K,
Moore BK. Influence of delayed placement of
84. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley
composites over cured adhesives on dentin bond
DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration
strength of single-application self-etch systems.
on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999;78:898–905.
Oper Dent 2006;31:18–24.
85. Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage
100. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate
and contraction stress of dental resin composites.
dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect
Dent Mater 2005;21:1150–1157.
restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:511–519.
86. Iida K, Inokoshi S, Kurosaki N. Interfacial gaps follow-
101. Dietschi D. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal
ing ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
Adaptation of Adhesive Class II Restorations: In
Oper Dent 2003;28:445–452.
Vitro Fatigue Tests [thesis]. Amsterdam: Academic
Center for Dentistry of the University of Amsterdam
and the Vrije University, 2003:35–54, 75–94.