Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
net/publication/224175627
CITATIONS READS
8 1,116
2 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ravi Kumar on 05 June 2014.
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the design of the log periodically scaled microstrip patch
antenna. The novelty of this antenna structure is a combination of a number of
patch elements to create a log periodic array with modest bandwidth. The
radiating element is a square patch antenna. The input impedance of the patch is
adjusted to the probe feed and matched at 50-ohm impedance.
INTRODUCTION
Microstrip antenna has gain popularity of their small size and light weight
however a limitation of microstrip antenna is the narrow bandwidth of the basic
element. The bandwidth of basic patch element is usually 1-3%. The bandwidth of
antenna is defined [1] as the range of frequencies over which the performance of
the antenna with respect to some characteristics confirms to a specified standard.
The bandwidth of the antenna depends on patch shape, resonant frequency,
dielectric constant and the thickness of the substrate.
DESIGN CONSIDERATION
The design principle for log-periodic antenna requires scaling of dimensions for
period to period so that performance is periodic with the logarithm of frequency.
This principle can be applied to an array of patch antennas [3]. The patch length
(L), the width (W) and inset (I) are related to the scale factor (τ).
Ln +1 Wn +1 I n +1
τ= = = (1.1)
Ln Wn In
If we multiply all the dimensions of the array by τ it scales into itself with element
n becoming element n+1, element n+1 becomes n+2 and so on. The self scaling
c
fr = (1.2)
2 ( L + 2ΔL ) ε eff
⎡W ⎤
(ε + 0.3) ⎢ + 0.264 ⎥
eff
⎣h ⎦
ΔL = 0.412h (1.3)
⎡W ⎤
(ε eff − 0.3) ⎢⎣ h + 0.8⎥⎦
⎡ ⎤
⎢ ε +1 ⎥
(
ε eff = ⎢ r
) + ( ε r − 1) 1 ⎥ (1.4)
⎢ 2 2 ⎛ h⎞ ⎥
1/ 2
⎢ ⎜1 + 12 ⎟ ⎥
⎣ ⎝ W⎠ ⎦
For microstrip antenna the choice of the width patch radiator is very important.
Small values of (W) result in low antenna efficiencies. The optimum value of W
is given by
−1/ 2
λ0 ⎛ ε r + 1 ⎞
W= ⎜ ⎟ (1.5)
2⎝ 2 ⎠
Table-1
W=L Lm dm
(in mm) (in mm) (in mm)
28.97 16.02 22.50
30.418 16.82 23.62
31.938 17.66 24.80
33.53 18.54 26.04
35.21 19.472 27.348
211
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
[1] Garg, R., P. Bhartia, I. Bahl, and A. Itlipiboon. 2001. Microstrip Antenna
Design Handbook Artech House Inc., Nonvood, USA
[2] Rahim, M.K.A.; Gardner, P. “The design of nine element quasi microstrip log
periodic antenna” RF and Microwave Conference, 2004. RFM 2004.
Proceedings 5-6 Oct. 2004 Page(s): 132- 135
[3] Balanis, C.A., 'Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design', Znd edition, John
Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1997
[4] Rahim, M.K.A.; Gardner, P., “Microstrip log periodic antenna using circuit
simulator”.; Antennas, Propagation and EM Theory, 2003. Proceedings 2003
6th International Symposium on 28 Oct.-1 Nov. 2003 Page(s): 202 – 205
[5] W.L. Stutzman and G.A. thiele, “Antenna Theory and Design, NewYork :
Wiley, 1981, section 6.5
[6] J.D. Kraus, ‘Antennas’, 1988, McGraw-Hill
[7] W.L. Stutzman and G.A. thiele, “Antenna Theory and Design, NewYork :
Wiley, 1981, section 6.5
[8] IE3D Software Release 8.1 versions and developed by M/S Zeland Software
Inc.
212
Fig.1 Proposed Geometry of Microstrip LPA
213
Fig. 4 Gain Vs Frequency
214
View publication stats